text:
How Microsoft Lost Its Mojo: Steve Ballmer and Corporate America's Most Spectacular Decline | Business | Vanity Fair
Once upon a time, Microsoft dominated the tech industry; indeed, it was the wealthiest corporation in the world. But since 2000, as Apple, Google, and Facebook whizzed by, it has fallen flat in every arena it entered: e-books, music, search, social networking, etc., etc. Talking to former and current Microsoft executives, Kurt Eichenwald finds the fingers pointing at C.E.O. Steve Ballmer, Bill Gates's successor, as the man who led them astray.
To the saccharine rhythm of a Muzak clip, Steve Ballmer crouched into a tackling stance and dashed across a ballroom stage at the Venetian Las Vegas. A 20-foot wall of video screens flashed his name as the 55-year-old Microsoft chief executive bear-hugged Ryan Seacrest, the ubiquitous television and radio host, who had just introduced Ballmer's keynote speech for the 2012 International Consumer Electronics Show.
More than 150,000 techies and executives were swarming the city's hotels last January in the annual bacchanalia of cutting-edge gizmos and gadgets. Attendees ran from one vendor to the next, snapping up fistfuls of freebies, inhaling flavored oxygen, and rubbing elbows with stars such as LL Cool J and Justin Bieber.
But this night, an air of discomfort filled the Palazzo Ballroom, where Ballmer was about to give the show's opening presentation, one delivered by Microsoft's C.E.O. for 14 of the previous 17 years—the first 11 by Bill Gates and the rest by Ballmer. Weeks earlier, the company had declared that this would be its final keynote—and, worse, that it wouldn't even be back next year as an exhibitor to showcase new innovations. The timing for big news about its products, it said, didn't match that of the annual high-tech pageant.
Rumors had swirled throughout the day that Ballmer planned to go out in a blaze of glory, offering a peek at a yet-to-be-released stunner from a company whose recent innovations had too often been lackluster or worse. Instead, what emerged was a gonzo spectacle, structured as a confab between Seacrest and Ballmer. Cookie Monster showed up, as did a gospel choir that belted out a bizarre song composed entirely of random tweets shot into cyberspace by who-the-hell-knows.
As for announcements of quantum leaps into the technological future: nothing. Ballmer applauded the still-long-awaited Windows 8 operating system (which as of this writing is available only as a release preview online). He burbled about his expectations for Xbox, the game console that successfully competed with Sony PlayStation. Out came Windows Phone 7 again, which, despite widespread praise from users, had experienced bleak sales results. A demo followed, which proved an embarrassment; the device's voice-to-text messaging failed and then another glitch forced a Microsoft staffer to reach for a different phone. The media response was dismal—the company's last presentation, a prominent blogger wrote, was a "cruel joke."
Microsoft's low-octane swan song was nothing if not symbolic of more than a decade littered with errors, missed opportunities, and the devolution of one of the industry's innovators into a "me too" purveyor of other companies' consumer products. Over those years, inconsequential pip-squeaks and onetime zombies—Google, Facebook, Apple—roared ahead, transforming the social-media-tech experience, while a lumbering Microsoft relied mostly on pumping out Old Faithfuls such as Windows, Office, and servers for its financial performance.
Amid a dynamic and ever changing marketplace, Microsoft—which declined to comment for this article—became a high-tech equivalent of a Detroit car-maker, bringing flashier models of the same old thing off of the assembly line even as its competitors upended the world. Most of its innovations have been financial debacles or of little consequence to the bottom line. And the performance showed on Wall Street; despite booming sales and profits from its flagship products, in the last decade Microsoft's stock barely budged from around $30, while Apple's stock is worth more than 20 times what it was 10 years ago. In December 2000, Microsoft had a market capitalization of $510 billion, making it the world's most valuable company. As of June it is No. 3, with a market cap of $249 billion. In December 2000, Apple had a market cap of $4.8 billion and didn't even make the list. As of this June it is No. 1 in the world, with a market cap of $541 billion.
How did this jaw-dropping role reversal happen? How could a company that stands among the most cash-rich in the world, the onetime icon of cool that broke IBM's iron grip on the computer industry, have stumbled so badly in a race it was winning?
The story of Microsoft's lost decade could serve as a business-school case study on the pitfalls of success. For what began as a lean competition machine led by young visionaries of unparalleled talent has mutated into something bloated and bureaucracy-laden, with an internal culture that unintentionally rewards managers who strangle innovative ideas that might threaten the established order of things.
By the dawn of the millennium, the hallways at Microsoft were no longer home to barefoot programmers in Hawaiian shirts working through nights and weekends toward a common goal of excellence; instead, life behind the thick corporate walls had become staid and brutish. Fiefdoms had taken root, and a mastery of internal politics emerged as key to career success.
In those years Microsoft had stepped up its efforts to cripple competitors, but—because of a series of astonishingly foolish management decisions—the competitors being crippled were often co-workers at Microsoft, instead of other companies. Staffers were rewarded not just for doing well but for making sure that their colleagues failed. As a result, the company was consumed by an endless series of internal knife fights. Potential market-busting businesses—such as e-book and smartphone technology—were killed, derailed, or delayed amid bickering and power plays.
That is the portrait of Microsoft depicted in interviews with dozens of current and former executives, as well as in thousands of pages of internal documents and legal records.
"They used to point their finger at IBM and laugh," said Bill Hill, a former Microsoft manager. "Now they've become the thing they despised."
Today, Microsoft stands at a precipice, an all-or-nothing opportunity that may be Ballmer's last chance to demonstrate to Wall Street that he is the right man with the right plan to lead the sprawling enterprise into the future. With Surface, the recently unveiled tablet, Windows 8, Windows Phone 7, Windows Server 2012, and Xbox 720 in the offing, he could be on the verge of proving his strategies—including last year's controversial, $8.5 billion acquisition of Skype. But whether these succeed or not, executives say, the Microsoft of old, the nimble player that captured the passions of a generation of techies and software engineers, is dead and gone.
"I see Microsoft as technology's answer to Sears," said Kurt Massey, a former senior marketing manager. "In the 40s, 50s, and 60s, Sears had it nailed. It was top-notch, but now it's just a barren wasteland. And that's Microsoft. The company just isn't cool anymore."
Cool is what tech consumers want. Exhibit A: today the iPhone brings in more revenue than the entirety of Microsoft.
No, really.
One Apple product, something that didn't exist five years ago, has higher sales than everything Microsoft has to offer. More than Windows, Office, Xbox, Bing, Windows Phone, and every other product that Microsoft has created since 1975. In the quarter ended March 31, 2012, iPhone had sales of $22.7 billion; Microsoft Corporation, $17.4 billion.
Monopoly Money
While Microsoft was once the hippest company on earth, its beginnings could be traced to the Holy Bible for nerds—Popular Electronics.
In December 1974, a 21-year-old college dropout named Paul Allen purchased the latest issue of the hobbyist magazine at a newsstand in Harvard Square and was barely able to contain his excitement. In bold letters, the cover headline screamed out that the world's first minicomputer with the power to rival commercial models had been invented. Allen rushed six blocks to Harvard College, where his high-school chum Bill Gates was a student. The two had long wanted to write an operating program using the computer language called BASIC, but Gates had held off; he would start such a project, he told Allen, only when someone developed a computer with a fast processor. Allen thrust the magazine into Gates's hands, and the two agreed: the moment had arrived.
Things moved quickly. Gates, Allen, and another friend wrote a program they called Altair BASIC and persuaded the company that made the computer—MITS, in Albuquerque—to license it. They named their new company Micro-soft. Soon, the personal-computer market was exploding. Micro-soft began selling its programs to bigger and bigger corporate players. Within two years, the company, renamed Microsoft, was setting the industry standards for microprocessor programming. Working at the young Microsoft was, by all accounts, thrilling, but also unnerving. Gates was relentless, demanding the same intense commitment of everyone he hired.
In 1980, IBM—then the world's largest computer-maker—came to Gates and Allen and licensed their company to write the operating software for their soon-to-be-released product, the IBM P.C. It was Microsoft's big break, bringing the company the riches it needed to finance its coming blast into the stratosphere.
The same year, Gates and Allen decided that neither of them had the management skills or business savvy that Microsoft needed. So Gates turned to a Harvard friend, a boisterous, loud, hard-charging math-and-economics major—Ballmer—to run the business side. Ballmer had worked as an assistant product manager at Procter & Gamble before enrolling at Stanford business school, from which he dropped out to join Microsoft. In his 2011 book, Idea Man, Allen remembers meeting Ballmer: "I thought, This guy looks like an operative for the NKVD [the secret police of the U.S.S.R.]. He had piercing blue eyes and a genuine toughness."
The company started doubling and tripling in size every year, and the operating systems from Microsoft grew in sophistication. MS-DOS was a text-based system, but then came Windows, which brought a graphic interface—desktops, icons, and the like—to P.C.'s and any other computer.
On August 24, 1995, Microsoft reached the pinnacle of cool, releasing what would then be its largest-selling operating system ever: Windows 95. Seeking to buy the first copies, computer geeks lined up at midnight around the block outside technology stores. Jay Leno showed up at Microsoft's campus to celebrate, and the Empire State Building was lit in Microsoft's colors—red, yellow, and green. Gates paid $3 million to the Rolling Stones for rights to use their classic "Start Me Up" as the theme song for ads and other presentations. Yes, a theme song. For software.
By the end of 1997, Windows 95, along with Microsoft's other operating systems, ran on 86.3 percent of the P.C.'s in the U.S. (Apple's Mac O.S., by contrast, then had only 4.6 percent of the market.) Worth $6.8 billion, Bill Gates had been named the richest man in the world by Forbes magazine in 1992. Nerds were now chic, and Microsoft exerted unprecedented power over American society. It seemed as if nothing could ever slow the software Goliath.
On the other hand, investor Warren Buffett, the "oracle of Omaha," didn't get Microsoft.
It was August 1997, and Jeff Raikes—the executive responsible for Microsoft's sales, marketing, and service initiatives—was urging him to buy shares. Microsoft, Raikes wrote in an e-mail, was just like the Coca-Cola Company, one of Buffett's best-known investments. Coke essentially received a royalty on swallows; Microsoft manned the toll bridge for almost every personal computer sold in the world.
Still, Raikes conceded, there was a danger in Microsoft shares. The threat, he wrote, was from some unforeseen transformation of the tech market, the same phenomenon that had crippled IBM, the granddaddy of computer giants, when Microsoft burst onto the scene.
"I think [I.B.M's] addiction to the power they had in previous generations of computing really blindsided them from the paradigm shift of the PC," he wrote.
That concern about Microsoft made sense to Buffett. Would the company fall prey to the arrogance that dethroned IBM? Would there be another paradigm shift that Microsoft didn't see until it was too late?
Raikes acknowledged that he had the same worries. "I do wonder about the time period ten or twenty or more years down the road," he wrote.
He had good reason to fret. Signs that Microsoft would be missing the boat in the next decade were already emerging. That very moment at Microsoft's headquarters, in Redmond, Washington, a group of executives were developing a device that, in 10 years' time, would transform a multi-billion-dollar industry: an electronic reader that allowed customers to download digital versions of any written material—books, magazines, newspapers, whatever. But, despite its multi-year head start, Microsoft would not be the one to introduce the game-changing innovation to the market. Instead, the big profits would eventually go to Amazon and Apple.
The spark of inspiration for the device had come from a 1979 work of science fiction, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams. The novel put forth the idea that a single book could hold all knowledge in the galaxy. An e-book, the Microsoft developers believed, would bring Adams's vision to life. By 1998 a prototype of the revolutionary tool was ready to go. Thrilled with its success and anticipating accolades, the technology group sent the device to Bill Gates—who promptly gave it a thumbs-down. The e-book wasn't right for Microsoft, he declared.
"He didn't like the user interface, because it didn't look like Windows," one programmer involved in the project recalled. But Windows would have been completely wrong for an e-book, team members agreed. The point was to have a book, and a book alone, appear on the full screen. Real books didn't have images from Microsoft Windows floating around; putting them into an electronic version would do nothing but undermine the consumer experience.
The group working on the initiative was removed from a reporting line to Gates and folded into the major-product group dedicated to software for Office, the other mammoth Microsoft moneymaker besides Windows. Immediately, the technology unit was reclassified from one charged with dreaming up and producing new ideas to one required to report profits and losses right away.
"Our entire plan had to be moved forward three to four years from 2003–04, and we had to ship a product in 1999," said Steve Stone, a founder of the technology group. "We couldn't be focused anymore on developing technology that was effective for consumers. Instead, all of a sudden we had to look at this and say, 'How are we going to use this to make money?' And it was impossible."
Rushing the product to market cost Microsoft dearly. The software had been designed to run on a pad with touch-screen technology, a feature later popularized with the iPhone. Instead, the company pushed out Microsoft Reader, to run on the Microsoft Pocket PC, a small, phone-size device, and, soon after, on Windows. The plan to give consumers something light and simple that would allow them to read on a book-size screen was terminated.
The death of the e-book effort was not simply the consequence of a desire for immediate profits, according to a former official in the Office division. The real problem for his colleagues was that a simple touch-screen device was seen as a laughable distraction from the tried-and-true ways of dealing with data. "Office is designed to inputting with a keyboard, not a stylus or a finger," the official said. "There were all kinds of personal prejudices at work."
Indeed, executives said, Microsoft failed repeatedly to jump on emerging technologies because of the company's fealty to Windows and Office. "Windows was the god—everything had to work with Windows," said Stone. "Ideas about mobile computing with a user experience that was cleaner than with a P.C. were deemed unimportant by a few powerful people in that division, and they managed to kill the effort."
This prejudice permeated the company, leaving it unable to move quickly when faced with challenges from new competitors. "Every little thing you want to write has to build off of Windows or other existing products," one software engineer said. "It can be very confusing, because a lot of the time the problems you're trying to solve aren't the ones that you have with your product, but because you have to go through the mental exercise of how this framework works. It just slows you down."
But the power of the Windows and Office divisions in dictating the direction of product development was only one of the myriad problems unfolding within Microsoft that served to crush innovation.
The far bigger issue, executives said, was a corporate culture that by 2001 was heading down the path of self-immolating chaos.
The Bubble Bursts
In the early 1990s, it seemed as if every Microsoft employee's computer ran an application that left an image on their screens at all times: a cartoon depiction of a face whose expression changed depending on the direction of the company's stock price. When shares increased in value, the face smiled; when they fell, it frowned.
And no wonder. Almost every employee received a stake in the company through stock options. When the share price went up, everyone got richer. When it went down, everyone was—well, a little less rich. The mythology was true: in the early days Microsoft minted millionaires almost as quickly as it packaged software—the original 11 staff members besides Gates and Allen came away with sums ranging from $1 million to $100 million—and the result was that everyone ran full speed in hopes of pushing up the stock price a little bit more.
"People were eager and in a big hurry to capitalize on every opportunity to gather new revenue," said Ed McCahill, who worked at Microsoft as a marketing manager for 16 years. "In every meeting, there were clear goals and clear outcomes, because everybody knew that the faster they could move the quicker the stock price would go up and the sooner they would be wealthy."
Résumés poured into Microsoft from business-school and engineering students lured by tales of vast riches, and the company went on a hiring binge. Many of the longtime executives let new employees handle the work while they themselves lolled around, waiting for the next vesting period when they could exercise more options—a behavior known derisively by the younger hires as "rest and vest."
Then everything changed. On December 30, 1999, the face from the computer application frowned. Microsoft stock had hit its pre-split all-time high of $119.94 a share the day before, then started to fall. Even Microsoft, it turned out, was not immune to the dot-com crash.
Sixteen days later, Bill Gates handed off the C.E.O. reins to Ballmer. "I was stunned when Bill announced that he was stepping aside to become 'chief software architect' in January 2000, with Steve Ballmer succeeding him as C.E.O.," recalled Paul Allen. "While Steve had long served as Bill's top lieutenant, you got the sense through the nineties that he wasn't necessarily being groomed for Microsoft's top spot. I'd say that Bill viewed him as a very smart executive with less affinity for technology than for the business side—that Steve just wasn't a 'product guy.' "
A businessman with a background in deal-making, finance, and product marketing had replaced a software-and-technological genius.
Within a year, Microsoft had lost more than half its value, never to return to its soaring heights of the past. The stock options—once the golden key to untold wealth—were underwater.
The music had stopped. The Microsoft Millionaires were now working alongside the Microsoft Minions. One came to work bragging about his new Bentley; the other made do with a Dodge Neon. The days of shoulder-to-shoulder teams fighting to beat the world were over. A financial fissure tore at already strained relationships between the Old Guard and the new blood.
Small changes in corporate policy began to be perceived as slights to those who hadn't been lucky enough to land at Microsoft in time to become millionaires. When the company decided in about 2003 to save money by no longer providing towels for employees using the company showers, the response was pure fury. The older employees had millions, and the younger ones couldn't have towels?
"If you just add up the time people spent sending angry e-mails about the towels disappearing … I expect they lost a lot more money than the cost savings from the towels," a former lead software-design engineer said.
The towels returned, but the bitterness about cost-cutting didn't end. Microsoft abandoned its gold-plated health-insurance plan—the enticement, some former employees told me, that had brought them there in the first place. Whiteboards grew scarcer. It even became harder to find office supplies.
Worse, the strategy for success at Microsoft was turned on its head. Where once creating innovations was both the thrill of the job and the path to riches through stock options, guaranteed financial success could now be achieved only the way it was at stodgy old General Motors or IBM—through promotions.
"People realized they weren't going to get wealthy," one former senior executive said. "They turned into people trying to move up the ladder, rather than people trying to make a big contribution to the firm."
And so, the bureaucratization of Microsoft began. Some executives traced the change to the ascension of Ballmer, but in truth Microsoft's era of fast cash was almost certainly the actual driving force.
More employees seeking management slots led to more managers, more managers led to more meetings, more meetings led to more memos, and more red tape led to less innovation. Everything, one executive said, advanced at a snail's pace.
"There was this institutionalized system, and it was like designing software by committee," said Prasanna Sankaranarayanan, a former Microsoft engineer. "Things moved too slowly. There were too many meetings."
Just as with e-books, opportunities for major product developments slipped away. Windows CE, an operating system distinct from Windows that was originally used for pocket devices like personal digital assistants, would ultimately be the foundation of the mobile operating system that would power Microsoft's first smartphones. But despite the fact that Microsoft had the jump on its competitors with Windows CE, it still lost the race for the wildly successful smartphones.
"You look at the Windows Phone and you can't help but wonder, How did Microsoft squander the lead they had with the Windows CE devices?" said McCahill. "They had a great lead, they were years ahead. And they completely blew it. And they completely blew it because of the bureaucracy."
The achingly slow processes at times bordered on the comical. Marc Turkel, a product manager, told me about an initiative he oversaw around 2010 that involved multiple groups. At the same time the new project began, workers were breaking ground for construction of a 12-story building that would occupy a square block; Turkel's office window looked out on the construction site.
Turkel began negotiating with the different managers, then their supervisors, and then their supervisors as he tried to get the project finished. "It was amazing the amount of buyoff that was required," he said. "It was something, without all that time we wasted, that should have taken six weeks at most."
Finally, one day, Turkel was running another interminable meeting when he looked out the window. The building was finished. The project was not.
"I pointed to the building and said, 'When we started this, that building didn't exist,' " Turkel told me. "It was unbelievable."
Sometimes, though, the problems from bureaucracy came down to a simple reality: The young hotshots from the 1980s, techies who had joined the company in their 20s and 30s, had become middle-aged managers in their 40s and 50s. And, some younger engineers said, a good number of the bosses just didn't understand the burgeoning class of computer users who had been children—or hadn't even been born—when Microsoft opened its doors. When younger employees tried to point out emerging trends among their friends, supervisors sometimes just waved them away.
"Most senior people were out of touch with the ways the home users were starting to use computers, especially the younger generation," one software developer said.
An example—in 1997, AOL introduced its instant-messenger program, called AIM, a precursor to the texting functions on cell phones. Two years later, Microsoft followed with a similar program, called MSN Messenger.
In 2003, a young developer noticed that friends in college signed up for AIM exclusively and left it running most of the time. The reason? They wanted to use the program's status message, which allowed them to type a short note telling their online buddies what they were doing, even when they weren't at the computer. Messages like "gone shopping" and "studying for my exams" became commonplace.
"That was the beginning of the trend toward Facebook, people having somewhere to put their thoughts, a continuous stream of consciousness," said the developer, who worked in the MSN Messenger unit. "The main purpose of AIM wasn't to chat, but to give you the chance to log in at any time and check out what your friends were doing."
The developer concluded that no young person would switch from AIM to MSN Messenger, which did not have the short-message feature. He spoke about the problem to his boss, a middle-aged man. The supervisor dismissed the developer's concerns as silly. Why would young people care about putting up a few words? Anyone who wanted to tell friends what they were doing could write it on their profile page, he said. Meaning users would have to open the profile pages, one friend at a time, and search for a status message, if it was there at all.
"He didn't get it," the developer said. "And because he didn't know or didn't believe how young people were using messenger programs, we didn't do anything."
"The Bell Curve"
By 2002 the by-product of bureaucracy—brutal corporate politics—had reared its head at Microsoft. And, current and former executives said, each year the intensity and destructiveness of the game playing grew worse as employees struggled to beat out their co-workers for promotions, bonuses, or just survival.
Microsoft's managers, intentionally or not, pumped up the volume on the viciousness. What emerged—when combined with the bitterness about financial disparities among employees, the slow pace of development, and the power of the Windows and Office divisions to kill innovation—was a toxic stew of internal antagonism and warfare.
"If you don't play the politics, it's management by character assassination," said Turkel.
At the center of the cultural problems was a management system called "stack ranking." Every current and former Microsoft employee I interviewed—every one—cited stack ranking as the most destructive process inside of Microsoft, something that drove out untold numbers of employees. The system—also referred to as "the performance model," "the bell curve," or just "the employee review"—has, with certain variations over the years, worked like this: every unit was forced to declare a certain percentage of employees as top performers, then good performers, then average, then below average, then poor.
"If you were on a team of 10 people, you walked in the first day knowing that, no matter how good everyone was, two people were going to get a great review, seven were going to get mediocre reviews, and one was going to get a terrible review," said a former software developer. "It leads to employees focusing on competing with each other rather than competing with other companies."
Supposing Microsoft had managed to hire technology's top players into a single unit before they made their names elsewhere—Steve Jobs of Apple, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Larry Page of Google, Larry Ellison of Oracle, and Jeff Bezos of Amazon—regardless of performance, under one of the iterations of stack ranking, two of them would have to be rated as below average, with one deemed disastrous.
For that reason, executives said, a lot of Microsoft superstars did everything they could to avoid working alongside other top-notch developers, out of fear that they would be hurt in the rankings. And the reviews had real-world consequences: those at the top received bonuses and promotions; those at the bottom usually received no cash or were shown the door.
Outcomes from the process were never predictable. Employees in certain divisions were given what were known as M.B.O.'s—management business objectives—which were essentially the expectations for what they would accomplish in a particular year. But even achieving every M.B.O. was no guarantee of receiving a high ranking, since some other employee could exceed the assigned performance. As a result, Microsoft employees not only tried to do a good job but also worked hard to make sure their colleagues did not.
"The behavior this engenders, people do everything they can to stay out of the bottom bucket," one Microsoft engineer said. "People responsible for features will openly sabotage other people's efforts. One of the most valuable things I learned was to give the appearance of being courteous while withholding just enough information from colleagues to ensure they didn't get ahead of me on the rankings."
Worse, because the reviews came every six months, employees and their supervisors—who were also ranked—focused on their short-term performance, rather than on longer efforts to innovate.
"The six-month reviews forced a lot of bad decision-making," one software designer said. "People planned their days and their years around the review, rather than around products. You really had to focus on the six-month performance, rather than on doing what was right for the company."
There was some room for bending the numbers a bit. Each team would be within a larger Microsoft group. The supervisors of the teams could have slightly more of their employees in the higher ranks so long as the full group met the required percentages. So, every six months, all of the supervisors in a single group met for a few days of horse trading.
On the first day, the supervisors—as many as 30—gather in a single conference room. Blinds are drawn; doors are closed. A grid containing possible rankings is put up—sometimes on a whiteboard, sometimes on a poster board tacked to the wall—and everyone breaks out Post-it notes. Names of team members are scribbled on the notes, then each manager takes a turn placing the slips of paper into the grid boxes. Usually, though, the numbers don't work on the first go-round. That's when the haggling begins.
"There are some pretty impassioned debates and the Post-it notes end up being shuffled around for days so that we can meet the bell curve," said one Microsoft manager who has participated in a number of the sessions. "It doesn't always work out well. I myself have had to give rankings to people that they didn't deserve because of this forced curve."
The best way to guarantee a higher ranking, executives said, is to keep in mind the realities of those behind-the-scenes debates—every employee has to impress not only his or her boss but bosses from other teams as well. And that means schmoozing and brown-nosing as many supervisors as possible.
"I was told in almost every review that the political game was always important for my career development," said Brian Cody, a former Microsoft engineer. "It was always much more on 'Let's work on the political game' than on improving my actual performance."
Like other employees I interviewed, Cody said that the reality of the corporate culture slowed everything down. "It got to the point where I was second-guessing everything I was doing," he said. "Whenever I had a question for some other team, instead of going to the developer who had the answer, I would first touch base with that developer's manager, so that he knew what I was working on. That was the only way to be visible to other managers, which you needed for the review."
I asked Cody whether his review was ever based on the quality of his work. He paused for a very long time. "It was always much less about how I could become a better engineer and much more about my need to improve my visibility among other managers."
In the end, the stack-ranking system crippled the ability to innovate at Microsoft, executives said. "I wanted to build a team of people who would work together and whose only focus would be on making great software," said Bill Hill, the former manager. "But you can't do that at Microsoft."
Why, Jim Allchin wanted to know, was Apple's technology so much better than Microsoft's?
"I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft," Allchin, a senior member of Microsoft's leadership team, wrote in a January 7, 2004, e-mail to Gates and Ballmer. "Apple did not lose their way."
Truly, for senior management, the problems didn't make sense. Microsoft had some of the smartest people in the technology business. It had billions of dollars at its disposal, and the ability to throw that money into any project the executives chose. How was Apple avoiding Microsoft's pitfalls?
The answer wasn't hard to find. Current and former executives said that, each year, they tried to explain to Microsoft's top executives why the company was struggling in the quality of its innovation compared with Apple, Google, and other competitors.
The information was conveyed through employee surveys conducted every six months. Time and again, the message from the responses was the same: groups at Microsoft that are supposed to be working together aren't, a symptom of the stack-ranking program. And in response the company did … nothing in particular. "Microsoft keeps surveying the employees, hearing about the problem, trying to fix it the same way every time, and it never works," said Turkel.
And so Microsoft kept getting slammed by the competition. Apple released the iPod music player in 2001; two years later, senior managers at Microsoft were still trying to figure out how to compete.
"Because we are going to be so late with a music service, we are going to be behind others almost forever it seems like," Bill Gates wrote in a November 2, 2003, e-mail to a group of managers. "People won't want to give up their hardware."
The result, Gates wrote, was that they wouldn't be able to persuade customers to use a Microsoft system: "I don't see enough that we are doing that will help us be viewed as a leader People I know (a rich group, I admit) are getting iPods with thousands of songs on them." Herb Allen Jr., the billionaire investment banker with Allen & Company, had purchased dozens of iPods for his friends, Gates said. "Warren Buffett just loves the thing," he wrote.
Less than two weeks later, Allchin tried out a music device being developed for Microsoft by an independent hardware vendor. He reviewed the experience in a November 13 e-mail to a group of executives. "I have to tell you, my experience with our software and this device is really terrible," he wrote. "Apple is just so far ahead."
Years passed. Finally, on November 14, 2006, Microsoft introduced its own music player, called Zune. Fifty-four days later, Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone, which combined a mobile phone, a music player, Internet capability, a camera, and other features not available on Zune. But the iPod was still around for customers who didn't want a phone. In fact, Apple had already introduced its fifth-generation iPod, its less expensive iPod Mini, and was about a year away from marketing the least costly of its music players, the iPod Nano.
Zune was blown away. By 2009, iPod maintained an astonishing 71 percent of the market, the kind of numbers rarely seen anywhere outside of a North Korean election. Meanwhile, Zune limped along with less than 4 percent. Last October, Microsoft discontinued it, in hopes that customers would instead purchase a Windows Phone that, like the iPhone, has a music player.
Jobs Creation
Apple blasted ahead even on operating systems—Microsoft's bread and butter—during the lost decade. In May 2001, Microsoft undertook a project code-named Longhorn, which was expected to ship in late 2003 under the name Windows Vista. Executives had a number of objectives for Longhorn, including competing with the free operating system called Linux by supporting a programming language named C#, which allowed for easier development of other software; creating a Windows File System, or WinFS, which could save different types of files into a single database; and creating a display system, code-named Avalon, that would give software the same appearance as a Web site.
As development took off, Microsoft engineers dumped a grab bag of functions into Longhorn. Huge teams were assigned to the effort, but despite all the work, the launch was postponed again and again. The program took as long as 10 minutes to boot up. It was unstable and frequently crashed.
Then, in June 2004, Steve Jobs announced that Apple was releasing its new operating system, called "Tiger." And inside Microsoft, jaws dropped. Tiger did much of what was planned for Longhorn—except that it worked.
E-mails flew around Microsoft, expressing dismay about the quality of Tiger. To executives' disbelief, it contained functional equivalents of Avalon and WinFS.
"It was fucking amazing," wrote Lenn Pryor, part of the Longhorn team. "It is like I just got a free pass to Longhorn land today."
Vic Gundotra, another member of the group, tried out Tiger. "Their Avalon competitor (core video, core image) was hot," he wrote. "I have the cool widgets (dashboard) running on my MAC right now with all the effects [Jobs] showed on stage. I've had no crashes in 5 hours."
The videoconferencing function? "Amazing," Gundotra wrote. Scripting software? "Very cool."
The Gundotra e-mail was sent to executives throughout Microsoft headquarters, including Allchin. He forwarded it to Gates and Ballmer, adding his name and one word: "Sigh … "
Longhorn was doomed. A few months later, Allchin brought together the Longhorn team and made the announcement: Microsoft couldn't complete Windows Vista in time to hit the latest planned release date. In fact, the company couldn't foresee any launch date. So a decision had been made at the most senior reaches of Microsoft: after three years of work, throw everything out and start over. It was decided, at least for now, to drop or modify many of the original objectives; no more using C#, abandon WinFS, and revise Avalon.
Apple was already in the market with those features; Microsoft was basically giving up in its effort to figure out how to make them work. More than two years passed before Vista was available in stores, and the public response was scathing. PC World, the industry magazine, declared it the biggest tech disappointment of 2007. Apple had won hands down on Microsoft's playing field for operating systems.
Then came Bing. Cue the evil laughter and organ music.
By the fall of 2004, Microsoft faced a huge challenge from Google, because the smaller enterprise was snagging so many talented young software designers. Google was emerging as the new "It" company, with lots of cachet. The search-engine titan had gone public in August and, just like the Microsoft of old, was minting millionaires from stock options dished out to employees. And, it seemed, day after day, a few more Microsoft executives announced their plans to jump ship to the upstart competitor.
One topflight engineer, Mark Lucovsky, met with Ballmer on November 11, 2004, as a courtesy to let him know that he had accepted an offer from Google, which at the time was led by Eric Schmidt. And, according to a sworn statement submitted by Lucovsky in an unrelated lawsuit, Ballmer exploded.
He threw a chair against the wall. "Fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy!" Ballmer yelled, according to the court document. "I'm going to fucking bury that guy! I have done it before and I will do it again. I'm going to fucking kill Google."
Internet search emerged as Microsoft's newest top priority. At that point, the company already had a mediocre search engine, called MSN Search, but it didn't hold a candle to Google. So, Microsoft developed Windows Live Search, which also proved inferior. Following more revisions, with a few features discontinued, Microsoft announced its new platform, called Live Search. Finally, in May 2009, Ballmer unveiled Bing. But by then the unit working on online search had become encrusted with Microsoft bureaucracy and the usual destructiveness that came along with it.
"It was a bloated mishmash of folks," said Johann Garcia, a former Microsoft product manager who worked on the Bing project. "They had two or three times the number of people they needed. There were just so many layers of people."
Working in the online division evolved into a miserable experience, members of that unit said. Most of the homegrown innovations were shoved aside. Instead, managers spent their days studying Google and telling the employees working on Bing to match whatever that competitor brought out.
"There was this never-ending demand to keep up with Google, and after a while we saw no more innovation for Bing," Garcia said. "Google was so far ahead and we had so much infighting. A lot of people became so unhappy and just lost all momentum."
To date, Bing has lost about $6 billion for Microsoft; add in the earlier search products and the amount of money poured into the effort rises to almost $10 billion. Microsoft did have some success making deals for Bing, in particular with Yahoo. In 2009 the two reached an agreement—controversial among investors—under which the Bing search engine would power the Yahoo Web site and the two would share revenues.
In the years since, Microsoft has boasted that Bing's share of the search marketplace has grown significantly. All of Microsoft's search sites accounted for 15.3 percent of the domestic market in March, according to ComScore Inc., up from 11.7 percent in March 2010. Dig a little deeper, though, and the numbers aren't quite as impressive. During that same time, Google's share of the market went up. Most of the increase in business for Bing came from users switching from Yahoo.
Bing's improved performance was coming at the expense of Yahoo, its erstwhile partner. Microsoft was eating its own.
When Apple introduced the iPhone, Steve Ballmer laughed. "No chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share," he said in 2007, adding that same year, "iPod is a hot brand—not Apple."
He pooh-poohed the iPad when it came out, in 2010, and it has been busting down the barn doors ever since, selling more than 55 million units. As for Google, Ballmer's predictions were equally off base—according to court records, in 2005 he proclaimed, "Google's not a real company. It's a house of cards."
Plenty of people can make predictions that prove boneheaded. But Ballmer's bad calls have been particularly damaging for him inside Microsoft. Until his dying days, Steve Jobs could not only predict the direction the marketplace would be heading, but help drive it there. Google continues to pop out feature after feature and is now shooting directly at Microsoft's main business lines: Google Docs is a free Web program competing with Microsoft Office. Google Chrome OS is a free operating system targeted at Windows.
With the competitors showing that kind of success—and winning so many accolades—Ballmer's confidently proclaimed errors have been hugely embarrassing for Microsoft's technical specialists, fueling muttered complaints that their C.E.O., a man with little technological background, was undermining them within the techie community.
"Steve has a knack for putting his foot in his mouth and being made to look incredibly foolish, and that just always grated on people at Microsoft," said a former program manager who left the company last year to work at Google. "When he makes these predictions that are so horribly wrong, and you know it at the time, it is hard to forgive that, because it means he is hopelessly out of touch with reality or not listening to the tech staff around him."
Ballmer's key business philosophy for Microsoft was so antiquated as to be irrelevant. The Microsoft C.E.O. used to proclaim that it would not be first to be cool, but would be first to profit—in other words, it would be the first to make money by selling its own version of new technologies. But that depended on one fact: Microsoft could buy its way into the lead, because it always had so much more cash on hand than any of its competitors.
No more. The advantage that Ballmer relied on for so long is now nonexistent. Google has almost the same amount of cash on its books as Microsoft—$50 billion to Microsoft's $58 billion. Apple, on the other hand, started the year with about $100 billion. Using superior financial muscle to take over a market won't work for Microsoft or Ballmer anymore.
But, strangely, Ballmer may be invaluable for the company's future. Because the time may be coming when the sprawling Microsoft empire will have to be busted up, like any other company that has spread itself too thin into too many product lines. And a deal-maker like Ballmer is just the type to lead that kind of massive corporate reorganization.
Ballmer has said he plans to stay in the saddle until 2018, but whether he and the rest of Microsoft's management want it or not, change will almost certainly come as Wall Street tires of the company's unfulfilled promises. Already there are rumblings that the time for him to go could be in the offing.
In Walter Isaacson's authorized biography Steve Jobs, Jobs acknowledged Ballmer's role in Microsoft's problems: "The company starts valuing the great salesmen, because they're the ones who can move the needle on revenues, not the product engineers and designers. So the salespeople end up running the company.… [Then] the product guys don't matter so much, and a lot of them just turn off. It happened at Apple when [John] Sculley came in, which was my fault, and it happened when Ballmer took over at Microsoft. Apple was lucky and it rebounded, but I don't think anything will change at Microsoft as long as Ballmer is running it."
Most interesting, however, is that Jobs put the ultimate blame on Bill Gates: "They were never as ambitious product-wise as they should have been. Bill likes to portray himself as a man of the product, but he's really not. He's a businessperson. Winning business was more important than making great products. Microsoft never had the humanities and liberal arts in its DNA."
How Microsoft Lost Its Mojo: Steve Ballmer and Corporate America's Most Spectacular Decline | Business | Vanity Fair.


text:
Beach reminds you of glistening waves gently lapping against shimmering white sand, a soft breeze, glorious sunshine beaming down from pristine blue skies, and the sound of the sea. It is a perfect break from the hustle and bustle of everyday life and relaxing in the lap of nature. Watching the waves forming and hitting the shores, looking for seashells, and playing in the sand makes you feel calm and relaxed.
If you don't stay in a beachside cottage, these things last only till the time you are having a vacation at the beach and once you are back the city life starts taking its toll. You long for that good time that rejuvenated you while you were at the beach. So, why not add coastal inspiration to your home décor. You cannot, of course, replicate all the things, but incorporating few things will at least make you feel happy and will help in retaining good mood for a long time.
Let us see some of the beach-inspired home décor ideas.
- You can easily get the natural decorations from the sea or buy it along the sea shore. These include sea stars, shells, ropes, corals, driftwood etc. These are all fantastic decorations to give your home an ocean environment. You can add coastal artwork over the fireplace flanks shelving that is filled to the brim with shell frames and boxes. A beautiful array of sea stars, seashells, and sand dollars is enough to add organic accent to the space and that too instantly and inexpensively.
- Adding accessories in shades of the ocean like blue, greenish blue, white and light grey also helps in creating a stunning beach feel. You can have seashell printed cushions or pillows or rugs mimicking the ocean's dazzling blues over it. You can place a glass vase filled with all those treasures you picked from the sea shore and make it the focal point of the room.
- You can choose a sunny palette for your room. Crisp white, when combined with punches of bright shades especially in orange or red hues, immediately transports you to the sunset time at the beach.
- For your bathroom, you can have a floor in beige shade that gives the feel of the pristine sand. The tiles used in the bathroom can be a bit coarse in texture so that one doesn't slip and that gives the perfect feel of walking on sand. You can have seashell-trimmed accessories and aquamarine tiles bordering the tub to add more coastal feel.
- If you are blessed to have a backyard, you can convert it into your own beach cabana. That way, you can always slip into that magical world of being at the beach at your will. Keep the colour scheme blue and white; have canvas curtains with probably the replicas of waves on it and porthole-style window. Canvas curtains add softness and additional protection. Have lounge chairs and whenever you want to slip to your beach gateway grab a book and some refreshing beverages and move away from the hustle and bustle of city life. This small tailor-made serene gateway right at your backyard will transport you to the heavenly coast in no time.
- You can also add a coastal character to your home exterior. For this, you will need to have beach house style architecture and use some vibrant colours. If that is not possible, you can just add a louvered doorway, which adds that flair and gives the feel of a beach house. The louvered doors are perfect to add that nostalgic look of old beach cottages. If opened fully, they invite the outdoors in or you can shut when needed for protection from the elements.
- When on the beach, you can see nature in its best colours. The ocean water reflects so many shades all through the day. The sunrise and sunset time is nature at its best with bright and vibrant shades against the foamy waves and glistening sand. So, beach dwellers are never fearful of adding colours to their décor. If you want to have that decor in your house, be bold and add those colours on your porch, which you would never consider otherwise. Place some Adirondack chairs that are readily available in colours of the spectrum to get that feel of being at beachside.
If you love to be at the beach and can't find time to visit one often, then there's no need to get disheartened. These tips will help you replicate the feel of being at the beach right at your home. Right from colour to accessories, add some of these coastal twists to your home for a seaside feel. A little effort and you can enjoy the benefits whenever you want.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Younique Products helps protect your information by using industry-standard AES 256-bit encryption on our website. Your payment information will always be processed using this secure encryption method, and Younique products never sells or shares our customers' information with any third parties. To verify our encryption certificate, look for the "https://" in your browser's address bar, directly before "www.youniqueproducts.com". The 's' lets you know that the website address is being encrypted. If you want even more detailed information, you can click the lock icon in your browser to bring up certificate details. Accessing this may vary depending on your Web browser and version.
You are presented with 2 choices when checking out: 1) "Login With Facebook", or 2) "Checkout without Creating an Account". When you choose the Facebook option, you are simply creating a Younique account that lets you log in with the same credentials you use on Facebook. Your billing and shipping information are completely, 100% separate from Facebook and are not tied together in any way. Facebook has nothing to do with processing your order, and will never even know that you placed an order with Younique. If you choose the "Checkout without Creating an Account" option, it means that you are checking out anonymously, and will not have a permanent Younique account. You will not be able to come back and review your order history, but you will receive an emailed receipt of your order.
Neither Younique nor any of its Presenters will store your payment information in our databases. Payments are processed by Paypal Payment Solutions®.
Please feel free to contact customer support if you have any further questions regarding website security.


text:
O's fall in first game of critical series against Rays
Tampa Bay wins 5-3 on Monday
Alex Cobb allowed two hits over seven innings Monday night, helping the Tampa Bay Rays keep their slim playoff hopes alive with a 5-3 victory over the Baltimore Orioles.
Ben Zobrist hit his 20th homer and Chris Giminez had a two-run double off Wei-Yin Chen as the Rays pulled away from a 1-1 tie in the seventh. Cobb (11-9) yielded a fourth-inning single to J.J. Hardy and an opposite-field solo homer to Matt Wieters that had tied it in the top of the seventh.
The Rays won for the 11th time in 12 games, a stretch that's kept them in contention for the AL's second wild-card.
They began the night trailing Oakland by three games and must sweep the Orioles and hope the A's drop three straight to Texas to remain alive.
Baltimore already is assured of being in the playoffs for the first time in 15 years, but still has its sights on outlasting the Yankees for the AL East title. The Orioles fell a game out of first place behind New York when the Yankees beat Boston.
Zobrist hit a solo homer in the fourth. The Rays scored three unearned runs off Chen (12-11) in the seventh, then added one in the eighth for a 5-1 lead.
Chris Davis homered for the fifth straight game for Baltimore, a two-run shot off Kyle Farnsworth that trimmed Baltimore's deficit to 5-3 in the ninth. (continued, next page)
O's fans: Show how you BUCKle Up! O's fans send pictures, videos to u local
Fernando Rodney gave up singles to Adam Jones and Wieters to put the potential tying runs on base. The Rays closer struck out Jim Thome and Mark Reynolds before getting Endy Chavez to hit a grounder back to mound to end the game. It was Rodney's 47th save in 49 opportunities.
The Orioles arrived in St. Petersburg for the season-ending series later than expected Sunday night after their plane had to divert to Jacksonville because of a fire in the galley.
They officially clinched at least a wild-card berth when the Los Angeles Angels lost the second game of a doubleheader to the Texas Rangers late Sunday, and manager Buck Showalter, coaches and players celebrated by having a short meeting and toasting the accomplishment at the team hotel.
"We've clinched a spot, but we've got an opportunity to win the East. That's big," Jones said before the game. "You get to put up a banner at Camden Yards. It speaks something about the team. It means you finished ahead of the Yankees and Boston and Tampa Bay, everybody."
Cobb retired 10 in a row before Hardy singled between shortstop and third base for Baltimore's first hit. The 24-year-old right-hander walked Jim Thome with one out in the fifth and Nate McLouth with one out in the sixth. McLouth stole second, but was stranded when J.J. Hardy grounded to shortstop and Chris Davis took a third called strike.
Wieters' career-high 23rd homer home run cleared the short wall in the left-field corner known as 162 Landing, the spot where Evan Longoria hit the 12th-inning homer that the sent the Rays to the playoffs on the final night of last season.
The Rays took command again against Chen in the seventh, when Longoria reached base on third baseman Manny Machado's fielding error and eventually scored on Francisco's sacrifice fly. Sam Fuld on a chopper that bounced over Reynolds' head at first base, and Giminez followed with his two-run double that made 4-1.
Chen, who's 0-4 over seven starts since last winning on Aug. 19, hasn't won since Aug. 19, allowed four runs — three of them unearned — and six hits in 6 2-3 innings. The rookie walked one and struck out four.


text:
Originally Posted by Mathman2
Originally Posted by Rick In San Jose
That Michelle would take the time out of her incredibly busy schedule to reply to me, essentially a nonentity who's never met her, is a testament to her class and kindness towards her fans.
The great thing is that it is not just Michelle being kind and classy. No matter how big she gets, she still takes a youthful and unaffected delight in these exchanges and interactions. i think she's tickled when fans post off the wall stuff about her and blasts from the past.


text:
Photo by Sang An
A wonderful make-ahead summer meal, this dinner is just as delicious served chilled as it is served warm.
- Yield
- 4 servings
- Active Time
- 40 min
- Total Time
- 40 min
- 4 skinless boneless chicken breast halves (1 3/4 lb total)
- 1 tablespoon plus 1/4 teaspoon kosher salt
- 5 cups water
- 1 3/4 cups low-sodium chicken broth (14 fl oz)
- 1 fresh thyme sprig
- 3/4 lb haricots verts or other thin green beans, trimmed
- 5 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
- 1 lb tomatoes, cut into 1/4-inch dice (3 cups)
- 1/2 cup brine-cured green and black olives such as picholine and Kalamata, pitted and chopped
- 1 tablespoon torn fresh oregano leaves
- 1/8 teaspoon black pepper
- Sprinkle chicken all over with 1 tablespoon salt and let stand.
- While chicken is standing, bring water, broth, and thyme to a boil in a 4- to 6-quart heavy pot, then add beans and cook, uncovered, until crisp-tender, 3 to 6 minutes. Transfer beans with a slotted spoon to a bowl and toss with 1 tablespoon oil and salt and pepper to taste.
- Add salted chicken to broth and cook at a bare simmer, uncovered, 6 minutes. Remove pot from heat and let stand, covered, until chicken is cooked through, about 15 minutes .
- Transfer chicken with tongs to a cutting board and cool, about 5 minutes.
- While chicken is cooling, stir together tomatoes, olives, oregano, pepper, and remaining 1/4 teaspoon salt and 4 tablespoons oil in a bowl.
- Holding a knife at a 45-degree angle, cut chicken across the grain into 1-inch-thick slices.
- Divide green beans among 4 plates, then arrange sliced chicken over beans and top with tomato olive mixture.
Cooks' Note
Beans, chicken, and tomato olive mixture can be made 2 hours ahead and chilled separately, covered.


text:
It's almost like a Wheel of Fortune-style before-and-after. "Solid Snake in a box" + "a box full of kittens" = "Solid Snake in a box full of kittens!"
The artists, Becky & Frank of webcomic Tiny Kitten Teeth, painted this particular rendition of Solid Snake ("in his natural habitat," they explain) for artist Olly Moss, at San Diego Comic Con.
Today has been rough. We should all take a moment to bask in the joy that is Metal Kitten Solid.
A painting I did of a Mr Solid Snake in his natural habitat [BeckyAndFrank.com]


text:
Print Recipe
Biscuits and slices are bite size pieces of heaven that take us back to our childhood. Whether you are after chewydouble chocolate chip cookies, a tempting chocolate fudge brownie or classic coconut macaroons, you'll find a guaranteed crowd-pleaser at LifeStyle FOOD. Indulge in these mouth-watering recipes and treat yourself to a delicious afternoon tea today!


text:
N° 12–2010: British Chair for ESA Council
17 June 2010
David Williams, Acting Chief Executive of the UK Space Agency, will chair the ESA Council for the next year, effective from 1 July.
He was unanimously elected as Chairman of the ESA Council at the 215th ESA Council meeting, held in Paris, France, on 16/17 June. He will take over from Maurici Lucena of Spain.
David Williams leads the UK Space Agency, which manages all UK civil space activities. The UK Space Agency was launched on 1 April, replacing the British National Space Centre (BNSC), where Dr Williams served as Director General from May 2006. In taking up his post at the BNSC, he also became Head of the UK Delegation to ESA.
Before his appointment as Director General of BNSC, David Williams spent 10 years as Head of Strategy and International Relations with Eumetsat. His earlier experience includes previous work in the UK with the BNSC, the Natural Environment Research Council, industry and academia.
For further information please contact:
ESA Media Relations Office
Communication Department
Tel: + 33 1 5369 7299
Fax: + 33 1 5369 7690


text:
- Home
- Mens
- Irish Caps & Hats
- Kerry Tweed Flat Cap - Grey
Kerry Tweed Flat Cap - Grey - Reviews
The Kerry cap was inspired by the traditional Irish pub cap. This is a quality cap that's easy to wear.
- Produced using 100% wool
- Traditional peak-style flat cap with sewn fastening
- Perfect for Men and Women
- Luxurious quilted lining
- Made in Ireland
FREE Express Shipping Offer - details
(Immediate Dispatch; Average 2-3 Days Shipping)
Size Guide
Please remember, wool is a natural fibre and has a strong element of flexibility. If your garment feels slightly small at first, give it a gentle stretch which will loosen the fibres in a way that will not damage the garment or cause it to lose its shape.
Where a specific size is available for a garment: To calculate the size sweater you require simply measure across the chest of your favourite sweater in inches and double that value.
Free Express Shipping Offer
We are proud to offer our customers:
- A flat rate shipping offer - only pay flat rate shipping on 1 item - all others shipped for FREE (per order)
- Immediate Dispatch
- Average 2 - 3 days shipping
- Secure, Fast Delivery by DHL Courier with excellent tracking system provided.
See our Express Shipping page for full details.
Product Reviews
Customers also viewed


text:
Make plans to visit the VWCC greenhouse this week. A great selection of annual and vegetable plants are available and ready for planting in your garden.
You will find bedding plant annuals, Proven Winner annuals, hanging basket combos, 10″ planter combos, Caladium and perennials. We also have a good selection of herbs, peppers and tomatoes for your vegetable garden.
Wednesday, April 27 : 12:00 – 2:00 PM
Thursday, April 28: 12:00 – 2:00 PM
Friday, April 29: 12:00 – 2:00 PM
Saturday, April 30: 9:00 – 11:00 AM
Thank you for supporting the VWCC Horticulture Club and the Community Arboretum. Hope to see you at the sales!


text:
Orange County Urology Associates, Your Premier Urological Care Center
When you want compassionate, patient-focused urology care with close attention to your special needs or those of a family member, your first choice should be Orange County Urology Associates (OCUA), located in Laguna Hills, California.
OCUA is a state-of-the-art urology practice serving all of Orange County, with satellite offices in Irvine, Mission Viejo, San Clemente and Huntington Beach. OCUA provides complete male, female and pediatric urology care. The 11 experienced urologists at OCUA consistently deliver expert care, utilizing the latest technology and techniques, with advanced diagnostic tests and minimally invasive surgeries. The OCUA research department also gives patients the opportunity to consider clinical trials and investigation protocols.
The urology doctors at OCUA, along with the physician assistants, nurses and office staff, provide exceptional personalized care. They pay careful attention to the special needs of each individual patient and all family members. They offer diagnosis and solutions for the full spectrum of urologic conditions, including:
• Bladder control problems • Overactive bladder • Neurogenic bladder • Pain when urinating
• Blood in urine • Urinary tract infection • Prostatitis • Prostate enlargement
• Prostate cancer • Premature ejaculation • Impotence • Kidney stones • Kidney cancer
• Urology surgical procedures • da Vinci® robotic nephrectomy
• da Vinci® robotic protatectomy • Overactive bladder treatments
• Urinary incontinence treatment (including female urinary incontinence treatment)
• Prostatitis treatment • Prostate cancer treatment • ED treatments
• Vasectomy & vasectomy reversal • ESWL • STD treatments • Testicular cancer treatment
We serve the communities of Laguna Hills, Irvine, Mission Viejo, Lake Forest and Huntington Beach in Orange County, CA. Discover today's most advanced, effective urology care. Trust Orange County Urology Associates for real solutions. Call us at 949.855.1101 or use our convenient online Request an Appointment form to schedule your consultation with one of our urology surgeons.


text:
cbennett on Family Tree Circles
view: full | list
Journals and Posts
Wv/Va Bennetts
Searching where my Bennett family might link..
Descendants of Henry Bennett, Sr.
Generation No. 1
Children of HENRY BENNETT, SR. are:
2. i. Robert2 Bennett, Sr., b. Abt. 1775, Philadelphia, PA; d. Abt.
1860, Mercer Co., VA/WV.
ii. Henry Bennett, b. 1789, Pennsylvania.
Generation No. 2
2. ROBERT2 BENNETT, SR. (HENRY1) was born Abt. 1775 in Philadelphia,
PA, and died Abt. 1860 in Mercer Co., VA/WV. He married (1) EMILY FANNY
ADKINS May 08, 1797 in Christiansburg, Montgomery Co., VA (By Rev.
Alexander Ross), daughter of SHEROD ADKINS and REBECCA UNKNOWN. She was
born Abt. 1775, and died Abt. 1814. He married (2) CATHERINE ADKINS May
30, 1815 in Greenbrier Co., VA/WV, daughter of SHEROD ADKINS and
REBECCA UNKNOWN. She was born 1793 in Greenbrier Co., VA/WV, and died Aft.
1870 in Mercer Co., WV.
Notes for ROBERT BENNETT, SR.:
He probably settled on the New River plateau near the Pear post office.
His son Jacob lived in that neighborhood and was a large landowner.
Source: List of Raleigh County's First Settlers compiled by Judge Winton
A. White published in the Centennial Edition of the Beckley, WV
newspaper August 26, 1950.
More About ROBERT BENNETT, SR.:
Source: April 09, 1999, Jack L. Honaker (Posted on Gen Forum)
Children of ROBERT BENNETT and EMILY ADKINS are:
3. i. Jacob E.3 Bennett, b. Abt. 1801, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d.
February 10, 1874, Raleigh Co., WV.
4. ii. Robert Bennett, Jr., b. November 26, 1813.
iii. Letitia (Lettia) Bennett, b. 1810, Virginia; m. William P. Ward,
December 24, 1829, Greenbrier Co, VA/WV; b. Abt. 1809; d. September 25,
1883, Summers Co., VA/WV.
5. iv. Susanna Bennett, b. 1812, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d. 1872,
Summers Co, WV.
v. John Bennett, b. Abt. 1804; m. Unknown Bennett.
vi. Jesse Bennett, b. Abt. 1801, Monroe Co., VA/WV; d. Aft. 1860,
Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; m. Delphy Unknown; b. Abt. 1806, Greenbrier Co.,
VA/WV; d. Aft. 1860, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV.
Children of ROBERT BENNETT and CATHERINE ADKINS are:
6. vii. Catherine3 Bennett, b. January 05, 1826, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV;
d. April 25, 1870, Raleigh Co., WV.
7. viii. Robert Jefferson Bennett, b. Abt. 1816, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV;
d. Abt. 1865.
ix. Isaac Bennett.
8. x. Archibald Lewis "Archie" Bennett, b. 1829, Raleigh Co., VA/WV; d.
Aft. 1880, Raleigh Co., VA/WV.
xi. Rachel Bennett.
9. xii. Elizabeth Bennett, b. Abt. 1816, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d. July
29, 1920, Raleigh Co., WV.
xiii. Mary Polly Bennett.
10. xiv. William Henry Tolliver Bennett, b. February 14, 1820, Giles
Co., VA; d. February 16, 1904, Raleigh Co., VA/WV
Generation No. 3
3. JACOB E.3 BENNETT (ROBERT2, HENRY1) was born Abt. 1801 in
Greenbrier Co., VA/WV, and died February 10, 1874 in Raleigh Co., WV. He
married NANCY ELEANOR M. PLUMLEY April 11, 1820 in Greenbrier Co., VA/WV (By
Rev. Josiah Osborn), daughter of JOHN PLUMLEY and CATHERINE KAYLOR.
She was born November 18, 1800 in Montgomery Co., VA, and died February
18, 1882 in Richmond District, Raleigh Co, WV (Probably Abraham).
Notes for JACOB E. BENNETT:
He was born in either 1802 or 1805.
He and his wife Nancy are listed in the 1830 Logan Co., 1840 Fayette
Co., 1850 and 1860 Raleigh Co., VA/WV census.
They lived near the New Salem Baptist Church in Richmond District.
Source: Article from the Beckley Herald Becenteniel Edition, August 26,
More About JACOB E. BENNETT:
Burial: New Salem Missionary Baptist Church Cemetery, Abraham, WV
Census: August 12, 1850, Raleigh Co., VA (45 years old) (New River
Will: January 01, 1866, I have a copy
More About NANCY ELEANOR M. PLUMLEY:
Burial: New Salem Missionary Baptist Church Cemetery, Abraham, WV
Census: August 12, 1850, Raleigh Co., VA (Now WV) (42 Years old) (New
River Waters)
Children of JACOB BENNETT and NANCY PLUMLEY are:
i. Ervin4 Bennett.
ii. Martha Bennett.
iii. Nancy Bennett.
iv. Rebecca Bennett.
v. Thomas Lewis Bennett.
11. vi. Fannie Bennett, b. 1822, Logan Co. VA/ WV; d. November 27,
1903, Pear, WV (Now Abraham).
12. vii. John F. Bennett, b. 1824, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d. Aft. 1870,
Summers Co., WV.
13. viii. Catherine (Katherine) "Kate" Bennett, b. November 1825,
Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d. January 19, 1862, Abraham, WV.
14. ix. Robert Bennett, b. June 30, 1828, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d.
March 06, 1919, Raleigh Co., WV.
15. x. Henry Bennett, b. July 10, 1831, Greenbrier Co., VA/WV; d. July
10, 1900, Raleigh Co., WV.
xi. Ephriam Bennett, b. 1833, Fayette Co., VA; d. Aft. 1850, Raleigh
Co, WV; m. Manerva Bowyer, December 27, 1869; b. 1842, Fayette Co.
VA/WV; d. Aft. 1869, Fayette Co. WV.
More About Ephriam Bennett:
Census: August 12, 1850, Raleigh Co., WV (17 years old) (New River
16. xii. Andrew Bennett, b. September 23, 1836, Fayette Co., VA/WV
(Tombstone date); d. December 12, 1910, Raleigh Co., WV (Tombstone date).
xiii. Washington Bennett, b. 1840, Fayette Co., VA; d. Bet. 1860 -
Notes for Washington Bennett:
He is a twin to his brother Jackson.
I have the rest oh the info from this line down to me ... What i am trying to figure out is ... Where did they come from ? Some researchers say Pa? But i cant find a connection there...
please let me know should you have any idea..
- Displaying 1-1 of 1 Journals
- 1
- of1


text:
May 30, 2008 — To treat gout attacks, prednisolone pills may be as good as the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen.
That's according to a new Dutch study of 120 gout patients.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first drug of choice to treat gout, but NSAIDs have gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks, note the researchers, who included Hein Janssens, MD, of Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre.
"As a consequence, safer therapeutic approaches are needed," Janssens' team writes in The Lancet. The researchers also say that although long-term steroid use is linked to serious side effects, steroids "do not have important drawbacks" when used short term.
Janssens' study is a head-to-head comparison of the oral steroid prednisolone and naproxen during gout attacks.
The patients, who had no history of heart problems or upper gastrointestinal diseases, were divided into two groups. One group took prednisolone for five days when a gout attack struck. The other patients took naproxen for five days when they had a gout attack. None of the patients knew which drug they were taking.
In diaries, the patients rated their gout pain and disability while taking their assigned drug. They were also interviewed by phone three weeks later.
Prednisolone and naproxen were equally effective at easing gout attack symptoms. Both drugs also had similar side effects, which were minor and temporary, the study shows.
The study "will go some way" to show that short-term treatment with oral steroids is as effective as NSAID treatment in treating gout attacks, states an editorial published with the study.
But the editorialists, who included Timothy H. Rainer, MD, of Hong Kong's Prince of Wales Hospital, aren't ready to rewrite treatment guidelines for gout attacks. They write that further research should be done because the Dutch study was "fairly small" and was done in one center.


text:
Finding A Voice Over Artist is Easy!
Audition Global Voices.
Use the easy form below to
do this FREE!
Listen to demos that are submitted.
You'll get responses within an hour!
Make payment. Work with your chosen voice, download your files & you're done!
Access our massive list of voice actors
British Male Voice Over Artists
More Male Demos
British Female Voice Over Talent
More Female Demos
They Wish They Could Quit Us!
Searching talent on The Voice Realm was easy. Eduardo worked with me on a Spanish language version of a project I'm editing, and even though I don't speak Spanish, he made things easy on my end by editing his own file. The turnaround time was amazingly quick, and sounded great! I'd gladly recommend The Voice Realm to other producers and editors.
The talent were professional and sensitive to our needs. They went above-and-beyond our expectations to make sure the audio fit our project's specifications. I would gladly recommend them to others who are looking for professional audio.
It is indeed a pleasure doing business with The Voice Realm, the process is easy, the staff is friendly, the talents are friendly and helpful and the overall production was smooth. I look forward to our next project and utilizing one of their talents once again. <
We only list the most experienced and dedicated voice talent on our site.
You won't find any amateurs here that waste your time, missing deadlines and not responding.
If you don't find the perfect voice for your project then you don't need to pay.
Need to hire a voice actor in a hurry? Look for voice talent with 4 hour turnaround times.
We've got the best guarantee in the business. It's why we are used by advertising agencies and casting companies around the world.
Get FREE auditions of your script right now. If you don't find what you're looking for, you don't pay.
Our system sends your script out to hundreds of voice talent who record a custom sample for you.
- FREE to use. Self-service system
- Access our huge portal of professional British voices
- No hidden fees or agent commissions - EVER!
- 24/7 x 365 voice agent support via live chat
- Our voice actors can add music to your recording
The world's biggest network of voice over websites with the best voice actors. If you don't find a voice that you like, you don't pay.
Could it be any easier?
Clear & Affordable Rates
Huge Listing of Talent
Foreign Voices Available
Online Translation Services
Find British Voice Actors Online
The Voice Realm not only saves time, but also money, as the rate you pay includes studio fees.
EXPERIENCED VOICES - Hire reliable professional voice artists that have been carefully screened and met the quality and experience standards set by our team of agents. We have female and males in all age ranges, across many languages and dialects.
Search our huge database of professional voices who are skilled in narrations for electronic books, audiobooks and other narrations.
FREE AUDITIONS - The voice artist will record a sample of your script before you commit to making any payment!
You only pay when you've find the perfect voice actor for your script.
Our voice artists record for radio or TV commercials, phone on-hold messages, whiteboard videos, narration, internet, web explainers, business voicemails, in-store announcer, professional voice over services, corporate recordings and more!
It's fast, user friendly, and auditions are always FREE!


text:
- Datenassimilation (1)
- Geowissenschaften (1)
- Hochwasser (1)
- Hydrologie (1)
- Radar (1)
- Remote sensing (1)
- data assimilation (1)
- floods (1)
- hydraulic modelling (1)
Floods are hydrological extremes that have enormous environmental, social and economic consequences.The objective of this thesis was a contribution to the implementation of a processing chain that integrates remote sensing information into hydraulic models. Specifically, the aim was to improve water elevation and discharge simulations by assimilating microwave remote sensing-derived flood information into hydraulic models. The first component of the proposed processing chain is represented by a fully automated flood mapping algorithm that enables the automated, objective, and reliable flood extent extraction from Synthetic Aperture Radar images, providing accurate results in both rural and urban regions. The method operates with minimum data requirements and is efficient in terms of computational time. The map obtained with the developed algorithm is still subject to uncertainties, both introduced by the flood mapping algorithm and inherent in the image itself. In this work, particular attention was given to image uncertainty deriving from speckle. By bootstrapping the original satellite image pixels, several synthetic images were generated and provided as input to the developed flood mapping algorithm. From the analysis performed on the mapping products, speckle uncertainty can be considered as a negligible component of the total uncertainty. In the final step of the proposed processing chain real event water elevations, obtained from satellite observations, were assimilated in a hydraulic model with an adapted version of the Particle Filter, modified to work with non-Gaussian distribution of observations. To deal with model structure error and possibly biased observations, a global and a local weight variant of the Particle Filter were tested. The variant to be preferred depends on the level of confidence that is attributed to the observations or to the model. This study also highlighted the complementarity of remote sensing derived and in-situ data sets. An accurate binary flood map represents an invaluable product for different end users. However, deriving from this binary map additional hydraulic information, such as water elevations, is a way of enhancing the value of the product itself. The derived data can be assimilated into hydraulic models that will fill the gaps where, for technical reasons, Earth Observation data cannot provide information, also enabling a more accurate and reliable prediction of flooded areas.


text:
What is WordPress?
WordPress is currently the fastest growing CMS software. Initially, WordPress was largely associated with blogs as its main functionality was to allow easy blog experience. Yet, over time, its developers expanded its functionality to allow the creation of more complicated websites and grew it into a content management system rather than a blogging tool. WordPress is considered the easiest to use CMS thanks to a very friendly interface. It also has an amazing number of plugins which allow extension of its functionality in various possible ways. You may visit the official project website here.
Managing a WordPress Site
Starting a website with WordPress is really easy! There are several things you should consider though: hosting, installation, themes and management of content.
WordPress Hosting
WordPress is a low maintenance script that pretty much any LAMP host could support. Yet, you should not just go after any host, but look for a quality provider that understands the needs and the dynamics of this software and charges reasonable fees. SiteGround has specialized in hosting WordPress since its inception and is hosting tens of thousands of sites made on it. We make sure our service is top-notch in terms of speed, support and security for WordPress. Learn more about our WordPress hosting offer.
WordPress hosting by SiteGround includes:
When hosted by SiteGround your WordPress site will enjoy top speed, unmatched security and expert support!
- Free WordPress Installation
- Expert 24/7 WordPress Support
- Autoupdates
- Free Daily Backup
- Unlimited Traffic & Emails
- Free CDN Service
WordPress Installation
If you use SiteGround hosting, we will install WordPress for free. Or if you want to give it a try yourself, we provide you with Softaculous script installer (located in your account's cPanel), which will auto-install this CMS for you in just a few seconds. In case you are not a customer, you may refer to our WordPress tutorial for step-by-step installation guidelines.
WordPress Tutorial
Managing WordPress is not difficult, yet there are certain tweaks that might not come so easily for you. That is why we have prepared an all-inclusive tutorial covering the most common management how to tricks.
WordPress Themes
Customizing the look of your website is important as it could help improve your conversions and revenue flow. That is why we have provided free WordPress themes to help your site stand out.


text:
Top of page
Bottom of page
Total visitors: 69411Today: 26 Connected : 1
You stumbled upon this blog? Enjoyed your visit? A quick note in my guestbook would be highly appreciated. Thank you ♥♥♥
Please, let me know of any broken link or error whatsoever that you may encounter while browsing this site.
This blog is not financed by the intrusive advertising below. So you may want to use an ad blocker.
Updated 2020/09/13
Tweets by PensineMutine
Sign in :


text:
Yup, I'm a POG. Maybe the poggiest of the POGs. I've served three years and five months as one and to be more specific, as an 0111 Admin. In that time, I've spent countless hours being blamed for pay problems, working in an air conditioned office, and generally being some higher-ups personal bitch. However, I'm also one of the few Marines of my MOS that has more than two ribbons, been anywhere outside of Camp Lejeune, and know more than one aspect of my actual job title. What I'm getting to is this: what the fuck difference does it make? POG, Grunt, Marine, Soldier…guess what, we all die the same for this glorious thing called the U.S.A. No you say? I'm glad you disagree.
May 10, 2010 – Dec 1 2010 OEF
Not even a week into the desert I was told I was being fapped out due to my uselessness in the shop. I did not know that I'd be attached to 3rd LAD BN or 9th Engineers Security. This little TAD proved to be my entire tour. by the end of the first month with those guys, they never called me a fucking POG. It was a mutual understanding if not an unspoken one. IEDs didn't care about only killing grunts. The rounds didn't magically turn and bend to avoid my direction. The docs didn't give two shits if you were infantry or not; just that you helped them get the wounded out. Basically, I couldn't give a fuck less what you call your non infantry. We all bled the same. We were all scared the same. We all treated each other the same.
This concludes my rant.
Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.


text:
Product Description
Seared oak and a beautiful circular shape combine to make this super-stylish Broughton Mirror.
The dark wood of this round mirror makes it perfect for adding some on-trend, retro style to your bedroom or bathroom.
Great as a statement mirror on its own, or hang it over the Broughton Desk or Broughton Dining Table to complete the look.
Part of the Broughton range, matching furniture items also available.
Dimensions: 78 x 25 x 78 cm.
Estimated delivery time: 7-10 days, subject to stock availability.
Additional Information
Additional Information
|Width (cm)
|Depth (cm)
|Height (cm)
Product's Review
Write Your Own Review
Delivery & Returns
Free Delivery on all products.
A surcharge will apply for certain postcodes in Scotland and Wales. For more information on these surcharges please read below. Once we receive your order we will contact you to take further payment for these surcharges if required.
Approximate delivery times will be from 7 days to 28 days subject to stock availabilty. Some products may have a longer waiting perior due to popular demand. Made to order products will be 8-10 weeks and bespoke furniture delivery will be up to 8 weeks.
Delivery times do vary depending on the product so please contact us for further information if you require more precise time frames.
|Scotland Postcodes: EH, DG, FK, G, KA 1-26, 29, 30, KY, ML, PA 1-19, TD
|Scotland Postcodes: AB, DD, IV 1-28, 30-32, 36, 40-49, 52-56, 63, KW 1-3, 5-14, PA 21-38, PH 1-26, 30-41, 49-50
|Wales Postcodes: LL, LD, SY16-20, 23-25
|Wales Postcodes: SA
|Wales Postcodes: CF, NP
|North East Postcodes: NE, CA
|* Please note: VAT needs to be added at 20% *
Returns: At Element One House we know that internet shopping can be daunting so we want to make you as comfortable as possible by offering you a 24 hour 'no quibble' returns policy after delivery. Please note that you are responsible for the costs of returning the items to us unless we delivered the item to you damaged or in error.
Any damaged or faulty item must be reported within 24 hours. Any damaged faulty item reported after 7 days will be eligible for exchange only. All return items must have original tags and packaging; and must not have been installed, used, or modified. Simply email or call us and we will provide you with full return instructions.


text:
In the latter half of the 20th century, governments actively sought to ease impediments to the sale of goods over international boundaries. To facilitate trade and maximize corporate profits, a series of international agreements of broad scope were entered into, from the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to the establishment of the behemoth World Trade Organization established in 1995, as well as smaller but still very consequential bi- and trilateral pacts such as the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
These trade agreements and the institutions they established also pass judgment on environmental protection policies that effect trade. Instead of raising the bar, however, and requiring countries with poor standards to improve, the agreements most often force countries to weaken their environmental standards so as to open up trade and conform to global rules to which everyone can adhere with little effort.
Animals across the globe suffer as a result of this "race to the bottom" in environmental and animal welfare standards. When their 下载万家彩票s are eliminated and polluted, animals die. As corporate profits skyrocket, workers and people who used to sustain themselves from the plundered local resources become increasingly impoverished, leading to a class of poor and frustrated people who are forced to catch, consume and sell animals as fast as they can in order to survive. Truly "free" trade would be fair trade—fair for the less affluent global citizens and fair for the animals of the world, too.


text:
Why does a dark or blurry spot appear on my images?
This normally means there is dust on the image sensor of the camera. The image sensor should be cleaned.
WARNING: There is a risk of hardware damage. Do not use a dry cloth or commercial cleaning solution to remove dust particles from the surface of the image sensor. Doing so may cause the coating on the image sensor to peel off. For cameras with mirrors, be careful not to touch the surface of the mirror. Touching the surface of the mirror may cause malfunction.
IMPORTANT: For model-specific steps on how to perform the steps below, refer to the operating instructions supplied with the camera.
If the camera is equipped with an automatic cleaning function, activate it to remove the dirt or dust from the image sensor. If the dirt or dust is not removed by the automatic cleaning function, you can clean the sensor on your own by using a commercially available blower.
- There are many third-party kits available on the market that can be used to clean the image sensor. Check your local electronics or professional camera shop for availability. Sony, however, does not provide warranty for mishandling of the camera caused by commercial cleaning solutions, cleaning paper, or the like.
- Many camera shops also offer professional cleaning services for image sensors that may be able to be performed in a timely manner.
- Sony is not liable for any incidental or consequential damages due to mishandling by non-Sony service locations or otherwise.


text:
There are essentially two options open to you if you're considering buying a shiny new printer. One is the inkjet and the other is the laser. That's it, easy right? Not exactly. Deciding on the right one to buy has largely been down to the sort of printing jobs that you do most and how much you want to spend, but all that has changed recently.
Laser printers have traditionally been most cost effective for printing needs, particularly for larger volume print jobs and outputting documents that are rich in text. This means that the laser printer has been most commonly seen in offices, although it's also been good for home printing chores too.
However, while it can cope with mono documents and solid colour graphics such as logos and the like, the laser printer is less adept at producing lustrous, full colour digital images like those we take on our digital cameras and smartphones and subsequently want to print onto photo paper.
What's more, if you need a printer that can carry out varied print jobs, including printing CD and DVD labels, then the inkjet is invariably better at that too.
So are inkjets easier?
Inkjet printers are usually much easier to configure if you want to print directly from the gadgets around your home. They can be hooked up to your camera, for example, whereas the laser printer has less of this user-friendliness.
The Hero All-in-One range comes with a formidable range of high-tech features all of which are very simple to use.
It's not that clear-cut though, because considering which printer to buy has also been about evaluating the technical specification of a device. Core features in making any decision usually revolve around comparing performance factors including the dots per inch (or DPI) resolution on offer, the pages per minute (or PPI) and the connectivity options available.
Other factors, such as PictBridge support that allows the direct from camera printing option and what sort of media the device will accept, including USB sticks and memory cards, need to be pondered over carefully. There's also the type of paper a printer can support and how many trays are available to hold everything from glossy 6x4 photo stock through to A4 sheets of plain paper. All are crucial points to consider when deliberating over a printer purchase.
It's hardly surprising therefore, that the All-in-One printer has become a huge hit with home consumers and small businesses who need something that can do a little bit of everything. What the All-in-One does is to amalgamate every facet of printing and packs it into a single powerful device that can get the job done, but also earn its keep thanks to low running costs.
Cost effective
The main emphasis on these new All-in-One models, such as the Hero range from Kodak, is value for money. This collection of affordable printers all come with very reasonable price tags considering their formidable technical specifications and advanced software features.
It costs less than £20 to replace the ink cartridges on a Hero model, which is the cheapest in the industry.
They feature low running costs too. In fact, once you've bought the device itself, Kodak offers high-quality replacement ink cartridges for less than half the cost of other manufacturers. Your prized photo prints will also last up to 120 years.
It's not all just about offering unbeatable value though, because All-in-Ones provide the perfect compromise between modern inkjets that can deliver all of your full-colour digital printing needs and also the traditional home office style Laser printer that's long been so popular for those high-volume mono document print jobs.
A new way
Both inkjet and laser printers have often been seen as problematical to use. All-in-Ones, on the other hand, deliver a revolutionary home or workplace printing experience that combines an amazing ease of set-up and use with a dizzying array of features.
Adding to the appeal of an All-in-One is the fact that replacing cartridges is quick and simple, plus there's no mess or waste either. Even if you're printing large volumes of colour prints, low cartridge replacement costs still make an All-in-One hard to beat for home use or small office needs.
Hero printers boast photo paper trays, automatic document feeders and two-sided document printing for the ultimate in convenience.
If you're looking for simplicity, then an All-in-One will allow you to print every kind of document in complete fuss-free fashion, using some of the most sophisticated hardware and software technology available. There are features on the Kodak Hero range, for example, that can't be found on any other comparably priced printer currently on the market.
Unique features
All-in-One's are refreshingly simple to set-up compared to both laser and inkjet models, thanks to cable-free connectivity provided by their built-in Wi-Fi. It's possible to be ready to print in a mere matter of minutes by employing this intuitive wireless printing system, which works in tandem with any kind of computer platform.
Once you've powered up and configured your connection, an All-in-One delivers an unparalleled array of high-tech printing functionality compared to inkjet or laser devices. They're undeniably intuitive, with users being able to print on the go, directly from their smartphone, laptop or tablet device. This can be done using Google Cloud Print-enabled apps, including popular free options such as Gmail and Google Docs.
Meanwhile, owners of Hero All-in-One's have the Kodak Email Print Service at their disposal. This is a software bundle that allows users to send emails and also attachments to their printer from any location around the globe, using any email account. It's also possible to share the printer's unique email address with friends, family, colleagues and clients to receive printed files or photos.
The Office Hero 6.1 model makes a great addition to any home office with its full suite of productivity tools and touchscreen functionality.
The complete package
Buying a do-it-all device means that you can cover all bases when it comes to printing at home or in your small business office, unlike many inkjet and laser devices. All-in-One printers feature high-tech touchscreen functionality, separate photo paper trays, automatic document feeders and two-sided document printing for the ultimate in convenience. You'll be able to copy, scan and fax documents directly from your PC too.
Integrated Smart Sensor technology found on-board the Hero range of All-in-One's lends an additional helping hand with your printing duties – it automatically detects paper size and predicts the ink and paper needed to complete each and every job. Little wonder then that consumers are rapidly sidestepping both the inkjet and the laser in favour of an All-in-One.


text:
When systems don't serve students / Joe Nathan's Column
As we start a new year, it's time to ask some tough questions. Over the past year, I have seen more and more examples of education systems that don't seem to be serving at least some students. Some systems seem to be putting a priority on protecting the way things used to be, above the students and families they're supposed to serve.
For example, at a time when college and university costs are challenging for many families:
- Why does state law prohibit Minnesota colleges and universities from telling students and families that they can save money by enrolling in postsecondary enrollment options courses? The state's PSEO law (124.D.09, subdivision 9) states, "A postsecondary institution may provide information about its programs to a secondary school or to a pupil or parent and it may advertise or otherwise recruit or solicit a secondary pupil to enroll in its programs on educational and programmatic grounds only."
- Why are a number of Minnesota's two-year colleges not telling students about the law passed in spring 2012 that allows 10th-graders to take a career or technical course as part of Minnesota's Postsecondary Enrollment Options program?
- Why aren't a number of Minnesota high schools including information about this 10th-grade option in registration materials available on their websites?
- Why won't a Minnesota public university award an undergraduate degree to a high school student this spring if he's in "good academic standing," doesn't owe money, and will have completed the required courses?
- When state colleges have agreed that a number of high school teachers are qualified to teach a college-level class to high school students, why is a regional accrediting association insisting that students must take a certain number of credits from a college professor to earn a two-year, A.A. degree?
- Why are some school districts giving more credit on their grade point averages to students who take courses in the high school, compared to those who take a course on a college or university campus?
- Why hasn't a legislative mandate been followed in 2012 or 2013 that requires a yearly report from the Minnesota Department of Education to the Legislature on the number of students at each public high school who take remedial courses on entering a Minnesota public college or university?
Over the coming year, we'll explore these questions. It's an election year. Some of the issues discussed above involve state law. Some involve actions by local school boards. Some involve high schools, college and universities.
In each case, students, families and taxpayers deserve more than answers. If the institutions are serving students, answers aren't enough. Changes are needed.
Reactions welcome, please comment below.
[Originally published on January 1, 2014 at HometownSource.com]


text:
In keeping with The Talk's theme of revealing secrets this week, Julie Chen revealed on Wednesday that she underwent plastic surgery to make her eyes look bigger.
Chen recalled working as a local news reporter in Dayton, Ohio when she was told she'd never be on the anchor desk because she's Chinese. Chen, who was 25 at the time, says her news director pointed out that Dayton didn't have a big Asian community. "'On top of that, because of your heritage, because of your Asian eyes, I've noticed that when you're on camera, when you're interviewing someone, you look disinterested and bored because your eyes are so heavy, they are so small,'" she said the news director told her.
Sharon Osbourne reveals old fling with Jay Leno
"It felt like a dagger in my heart," Chen said on Wednesday's show. "It was racism." After an agent told her to get plastic surgery, she complied. "Now, it's like sometimes I wonder — but I will say after I had that done everything ... the ball did roll for me. I struggle with, 'Wow, did I give in to the man in doing this?'"
Check out the full video below:
What do you think of Chen's confession?