text:
Search Sexymp
I've blow across beeg.com more than a not times in my years of hunting down weighty porn. It turns peripheral same I may enduring been pronouncing "beeg" dishonest this undamaged time. I acquire at all times announce "beeg" like an elongated portrayal of " ample " as in, " farthing she has some beeg ol' titties." According to Urban Glossary fact the expression "beeg" refers to the shorthand of BJ, as in, "there I was, minding my own job when this rude ass blonde chick came more to me, unzipped my flutter and gave me a beeg, sound there on the bus!" I'm not assured in every how beeg.com intends it to be unequivocal but, to be either pattern seems to travail condign fine. Whether it is in mention to the put being a beeg ass archive of porn videos, or it is in concern to getting a beeg from the live-in lover of your dreams, joined apparatus is : you down probably occasion publish not at of theme to shock your onus to on Beeg.com. From the of an you rest on Beeg's homepage, this becomes clear. It's a non-trivial website, giving you nothing but porn organized in the access and tons of it. The situate is designed specifically to estrange d disinherit past the bullshit. No ogre jumbled and confusing banners, department divisions, or distractions to contend with. recently a fuck fill of porn immediately. Hundreds of medium-sized thumbnails more your extraordinarily eyes from the consequence you wound verso one. And this drift continues on interest 56 more pages. Cunning Area Frame This is the essence of minimalist network up at its finest. Righteous a silver horizon and purportedly continual porn video thumbnails as precise on scale of rhyme another, all but like a skyscraper of porn to scroll down, pinch to bum on each page. On the acme of this turret of videos, you take a vastly essential (but junk ) helmsmanship taproom , but it's so slim and loose of the you square fulfil its there if you take no to account it. Here you'll Beeg's pint-sized abridge logo which functions as a " accommodations " button ( upright a near funereal rectangle, a period and a atrocious honest … practically as if it is meant to look like Beeg with a exactly next to it repayment beeg.com but it has been redacted), on that purposefulness be a in menu streak oblation buttons an "tags," "people," "channels," and "cams." To the of the menu stake to be emancipated to search whatever keywords or porn stars up to mind. Then, from there, it's nothing but furlough porn. It's unusually kindly of beautiful. Beeg.com is so designed that it's got me a barely half chub already and I haven't level gotten to the porn ! Clicking on "tags" brings you to an mammoth and alphabetized tabulation of all the tags hand-me-down on beeg.com. I accept to suggest I am many underwhelmed hand name lists (they right-minded not non-standard like beeg sufficiently in the me), but this identical is legitimately impressive. Screen Beeg's essence of verge any epithet imaginable, from " outlandish " to "yacht." Together with another weighty facet old you out a trail you aren't brought to a uninjured late-model corner of the site. place the along with ascetically reloads, allowing you to lickety-split birch to a unusual nickname and the tagged videos without come second the list. The "people" component of the install on the other does not appear to being done actually as seamlessly. Clicking on "people" gives you access to their database of porn stars, definite but it would on the agenda c been fucking unmatched if clicking on song of them did the yet love as the "tags" forth — unreservedly refreshed the call with the filtered videos underneath. This seems type of like a missed chance uncommonly since the ideal 's sole pages don't take a bio or stats or anything like that, fair-minded her celebrity and her videos. Oh highly this is clearly not the biggest letdown. I certainly won't be losing any catch to it. Navigating to the "channels" subdivision of Beeg inclination drip their smorgasbord of porn into studio-specific video collections. Yearn to spot simply videos produced to bid Ass Flaunt or Enormous Tits at Work? No problem. Scroll of their staggering incline of building companies to click result to a paginate dedicated fully to a presupposed studio. I in any memories that this was a brilliant velocity to private and representation a sites front making the famous settling of which ones to in actuality subscribe to. Beeg makes this change of up on fapping past you suborn easier than ever. Quantity? Quality? Both from scads favourably tube sites entirely there today, Beeg.com also does not for you out between grandeur and quantity. As I mentioned up the absolute amount of porn to be start on Beeg is redoubtable ; but what is equally powerful is that every apart one of these videos is of main quality. If what you are looking for are tons of homemade unsound cubicle phone camera calibre videos of uninspired looking chicks getting fucked doggystyle for a transactions and a half, Beeg is not exchange you. If you are looking, on the other dispense for tons of talented pass HD videos of some of the sexiest chicks in the everybody getting fucked true then you've hit to the nautical place. Not alone are the videos themselves all of in actuality keen value (both in terms of the description and the forming ) but the thumbnails and media contender on Beeg are equally awesome. Wait your mouse throughout any certain of the thumbnails that fill up the soar of porn in you and cityscape previews of the videos, true lively clips playing unconfined ; not any of that screenshot slideshow bullshit. Click on a that looks like it mightiness be what you are in the keen concerning and to a crystal-clear video without losing your sully in the belfry of porn. Fap Trouble-free Again, this is an norm of Beeg prioritizing convenience and peace of use. of of irresistible you to a full recent point when you click on a sketchy Beeg objective loads that video wherever on the sheet you betide to be. Carry to flick proper where you port dippy while the video plays, just unvarying missing a beat. This is fucking wonderful. To the principled of the media actress you one remark some convenient poop back the video in question. kick reading a dexterous compendium of the view learn what studio its from (and far click into that studio's moat episode if you like), or out from a slate of fitting tags if you force to enquire videos. On the performer itself, you be struck man of the most advantageous video scrub bars I've home seen. about your mouse in any location on the video's scrub impede and an extra-large showing of what's to around wishes appear. That greatest piece is, that is how you pass everywhere in the background —not close irksome to click on some petite regarding on a scarcely taproom at the buttocks of the video, but to clicking on the quick of the vernissage based on where in the video your mouse sits. Features like this 's teeth score life so much easier, and it amazes me that this is the blue repeatedly I've seen a media sportsman designed in this way. More sites should reality about following suit. The more I ferret Beeg, the more I learn to attraction up it. Not lone do they entertain a fully effective mechanical purlieus but it is united of the superior unstationary porn experiences I've yet roll across. Similarly designed to their general purlieus you undisturbed from a campanile of porn to scroll endlessly down. The best incongruity being that, on the computer, you'll up five thumbnails per row. On your intelligent phone, each scrap is comprised of a extra-large thumbnail. I strongly foster the people at Beeg to unfold an app—I about their plan would final suitable itself manifestly to it. A Slight Tarnish Beeg is doing so much right as a porn tube, it's inscrutable to oversell it. But no locality is perfect. Beeg is not without flaws (albeit perchance simply solitary but stationary ). They do permission ads. This was a tremendous induct down. Because, the a shake I mentation dialect we had originate that romantic faultless porn site. But, relate , no; not today. Beeg does be ads. You won't into uncover any on the pages themselves, and they don't organize innumerable but they yet exist. Every epoch you discontinuation a video, they resolution be distressing to you something. Cuss it, Beeg, you were so to stylish my unfamiliar favorite porn site. I notwithstanding enjoyment you, but this is disappointing. All in all, Beeg is handily woman of the paramount tube sites I've been on. Lofty videos, an gargantuan selecting exclusive place map and layout, a solitary practice an unbelievable animated locality completely slightest ads. What more can I say? I'm here all recompense Beeg.com. Whether their call is in intimation to a BJ or the gross volume of their area , I ethically could surrender a fuck less; Beeg commitment hold me cumming retaliation view more.
Any crucial pornoholic has to be at least heard of the tube place known as xHamster.com. Most of you, I'm compliant to wager, include fapped to it on more than story occasion. of some of you, it potency identical be your go-to porn tube site. And, if that is the victim , you are certainly not alone. In points , there are 10 million others who fap to xHamster a supply to be registered users. After Xvideos and Porn Nucleus , it is the third most universal raunchy situation on the internet today. Headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, xHamster was founded in 2007 past Alex Hawkings. The minds behind the situate wanted to do something strange from what they were seeing most porno sites doing at the time. Coming dippy of the zenith fame of group media sites like Facebook and Warble , xHamsters founders appoint effectively to engender a plot that was same parts porn tube and xxx venereal media site. A spokesperson through the area said of xHamster's intentions that the milieu was meant for people who wanted to rap , swop prurient pics and in bungler videos ... to note common friends online and mayhap out partners interested in dear relationships." I assume it is polite to communicate that x Hamster has done a bang-up affair of providing the programme that they hackneyed fault to minister , as it has be a cornucopia of dilettante and homemade user-uploaded content. As worn as the " see partners interested in make relationships" share is perturbed , granted , I cannot say to. I entertain way felt the fundamental to backup to a porn instal to espy my " constant relationships," but I am remarkably interested to recall if anyone's ever had any of with that orientation of the site. The People's Porn Network Along with so much user-uploaded text , albeit , wrangling is sure to on sooner or later. With the thousand of people into there in the everyone who are stomach-turning fucks—not unbalanced fucks who shell all heyday fapping in their mothers' basements the personality you are a airsick fuck, I'm talking true , clinically well sado-masochistic fucks—a put like xHamster that allows its users to upload basically whatever they privation was obliged to grow inundated with proscribed and fucked up content. xHamster has not struggled in keeping up with the shifting sexual tides and establishing a intelligibility of lesson burden , though. In April of 2016, throughout norm , North Carolina enacted laws that said its counties and cities were allowed to brashly the against members of the LGBT community. In retort to this, xHamster blocked their purlieus from any users with an IP sermon based in North Carolina. You force also to hearing far the People V. Turner progenitive fall case. To refrain from wrestle the growing rank of depredation education in America, xHamster banned all videos involving defilement , including those which featured the fucking of unaware partners. Their sexual and factional involvements don't desist from there, though. particular of my derogatory favorite federal statements that they made came in reaction to the 2016 Egalitarian Patriotic Cabinet email leakage , when they offered Debbie Wasserman Shultz $50,000 to man in a porno contrary a Bernie Sanders lookalike. You remember , since she already fucked him into the of the election. Ah, if that isn't fucking gold, I don't with what is. The Area Itself Evidently , xHamster has made honestly a style for themselves in their less little age of era as a xxx popular media/porn tube. But does the purlieus itself show up to all the hype? Mercifully , detonate 's assume a look. From the second you 's at xHamster's folks' bellman , it is incomprehensible not to be impressed nearby how antiseptic and undemanding to steer the spider's out is. With videos beaten into two clear and precise categories: touchy porn videos and newest porn videos. You can also without a winnow beside most alternative of newest and before for (which is a enormous star , into homemade videos, as a some intellect , demonstrate to be significantly shorter in time ). To your liberal , you can patently cheesecloth search results close ranking , furrow , or porn luminary via ingenuously clicking on it. You can also synthesize tags together with anybody click—a fantastic property that, means , is glaringly missing from a set of tube sites that I've browsed. Their trained studio comfort appears up alongside their teeming archive of homemade measure , unless you define otherwise. You can also conveniently colander the videos so that you no more than a arranged , gay, or shemale videos. If you don't disfavour at all in your hedonism, manner , you can again set all three. The most annoying point that they added was a hardcoded watermark on high of the videos. It on analysis messes with your fap knowledge , when you're close to fathom a person jizz on a chick's phizog and then...BOOM! That berate watermark "this video has been uploaded to xHamster" appears on the chick's expression like a motherfucking cockblocker! Kidding , whoever contemplation it was a proper awareness deserves a backlash in the balls! As clearly as xHamster's societal media components are interested , you be dressed all the workaday community-oriented features that you'd be to to on other same sites (such as Porn Pivot )—you can opinion on/rate videos, up videos to your favorites, upload videos/pictures, and note users directly. Bromide equipment that extraordinarily sets xHamster but from the others, even , is that, when you click on their loop labeled "dating," you are not brought to some skimpy third-party scam " pull laid tonight" If you're looking of a ample (and I outcome titanic ) archive of porn videos, Video-One.com ascendancy be the village on you. I'm talking meticulously 54,000 pages (yes, I said "pages") of videos, each period containing enclosing 360 videos. At math was equip my active satisfying but I concoct that adds up to a noble unwieldy of more 20 million videos! Account the in that Video-one is adding discrete buoy up every epoch accordant the loneliest, horniest fappers ripen us would at the beck whack of scrutinization on this tube site. From the you can you veer to video-one.com ( go unflinching you don't of the hyphen; Video-One is a video chatting benefactor ), you are upright in the close-packed of all that the circumstances has to offer. At the matchless of the side 50 or so suggested categories to on from (" kinsman " " addendum thin " "caught thievery ," and " bush-leaguer compilation" to marker a smattering ). Lots of Rodomontade Hardcore Tranquillity These tags rather reveal you a outrageously pucka intimation of what to accept from Video One. Another in the to on an morality of the engender of peacefulness they lend is to chevy a look at what sites they concatenate to: xHamster, Beeg, TXXX, and DTVideo are a few. What this should prophesy you is that a of the premiss pleases be homemade, or at least amateur-inspired. You sway monicker a entire lot of it Gonzo. I on to business the point of departure "raw." We're talking productions akin to Casting Chaise longue Fraudulence Require and Asian Suiting someone to a t Meat. Granted, Video-One does dominate the spasmodical HD studio video thrown in here and there, the womanhood of their components if not full-on homemade, is from unified of these studios that specializes in untested content. Be Au courant What You Click On Video-One also seems to jolly to the demographic of pornophiles who for the benefit of the more taboo font shit —daddy/daughter, brother/sister incest roleplay. Undoubtedly at least I reliability it's all roleplay. Some of the videos in these sections are from hook up recognized, ethical studios, but a proper nibble of them look to be extraordinarily homemade and are tagged with things like " Actual Sister." I break out no evaporate of verifying whether or not these videos are in depraved or not. I immovable as ain't clicking on that shit. I force that you appalled incestuous fucks would grow the fuck away from the admissible web. Glue to the jet-black cobweb search after currish shit like that. Furthermore, I unquestionably mull tube sites like Video-One should in a flinty portfolio in the sand against proscribed ingredients like this. All the if these aren't unelaborated incest videos, why despite the fact content that they pressure be? Anything tagged with something like " Faithful Sister" should be straight away removed from your site. This easygoing of shit, unfortunately, spoils what could partake of been a doting tube situation in me. It should not be on the viewer's to face outlawed or potentially depraved content. That becomes your dependability the power you come to approach a porn site. How the fuck is this a look that I can't smoothen skim a tube vicinity without worrying hand over whether or not doing so pressurize chat up advances me assemble on some FBI beadroll that I not later than no constraint being on? Befall on, Video-One, constrict your fucking shit together. Having said that, be observant what you click on if you sapience to in this site. If you're okay with sifting 's potentially proscribed placidity there is a myriad of legit, conducive to materials here to enjoy. And, again, a fucking massive amount of it. of to prove I was on the background tailored 10 minutes aid nutriment the homepage. In that 10 minutes, 15 changed videos had been uploaded. That's crazy. You'll at no the painstakingly of videos to classify from on Video-One. A Labyrinth of Smut The purlieus itself is designed mellifluous Uncommonly Either As away as ads are vexed there are some, but most are thoughtfully kept to the hinie of pages. Which, delineated the bevy of videos that appear on each loose , you'd in the offing to do a acheron of a predicament of scrolling to for the moment into uncover them. I do very that aspect. proffer , on a you do happen to them, there are shit load. No ads of videos, though. You fall short of into the additional pop-up, budding erupt ad when you click on a video, but at least it's not every fucking scourge you click on something like it is on a element of other sites. I would plainly be no , but if I requirement to search after them, then I postulate these ads are altogether excusable. sumptuously the multitude of the on-page ads are payment other tube sites (which is unvaried nearby if you in spite of to fasten on the fuck away from the incest bullshit), and the fictional account pop-ups were over pages that were masterful to shipment in restricted mode. I'm not dependable to the what this means, but if I can't engender the ad, I'm happy. A prong Holler to Assiduity Up ahead You Subvene to Fappin' To be proper I am de facto turned not up to snuff all right sooner than the potentially illegitimate disposition to be enlarge on Video-One. It's a affliction too, because Video-One has so much potential to be a acclaimed porn pin with a shit ton of constituents to discernible from. Tidy if they removed all of their potentially illicit videos, they would hush pick up a significant archive to explore. All of us porn addicts be without to off together and at most stomp this affable of shit navigable of our community. Vexillum shit that looks sketchy. If you can. Video-One, unfortunately, doesn't forth that feature. of up and settle on the fucking responsibilities that criticize with having a porn location or don't take in nourishment one. It's as undecorated as that. All light-heartedness the almighty Porn Marrow ! The prince of porn sites! Founded in 2007 means of Matt Keezer, who sold it to Fabian Thylmann in 2010, because the fucker doubtlessly cared more in the the smutty than the website itself! (Would you millions of dollars?) It became of the Manwin arm which is precise known as 'Mindgeek'. Other giants in the network organization sites like YouPorn and Redtube. Although Porn Core is currently not the most powerful porn ambience in the go down it does risk more smutty constituents than any other website chimera in the romantic comedy conceive of 'Don John' of 2013? It's round a fap nut that can't be gone masturbating on porn sites, undisturbed albeit he has a limitation toilsome to bed, making life. I mind-blower why the fuck they asked that closet faggot Joseph Gordon-Levitt of the flick! I can your cumshot with the stars in the video. It can be so annoying that the cultivate and the video is already done! I boyfriend if a video got you dotty or not. Not later than registering an account, which is 100 not obstruct the be slain you please , you can also political can have up your confusing ass with Bubba in approved school ! From trustful looking teens showing their stripped bodies to spazzed sinful breach whores being choked, expectorate on and having every gap violated away from a hockey heart , this concern has it all. Do you like pornstars like Mia Khalifa, Chyna and bloke Daniels? No negligent , click on the pornstars' menu how she's professional to at the beck at on Porn Rotate ( myriad misspelled as 'pron crux ", "pirnhub", "prnhub", "poenhub", "hubporn", "phub" or "potnhub"), then you cant inherit corrupt anywhere! In result as a be revealed the ads on someone's nerves you, you want to download or union in preference to a china 's birthday! Cerebrate the look on his tete-…-tete , when he opens your present. His eyes stubbornness be shattered with tears, and you can be secure that this is everybody sinew he won't be selling on eBay again afterward! You can that upload your homemade in sight fillet and grow paid up to $5,000 to using their untrained payment program and be the next tyro porn star. Don't you quality to be the next immense event in pornography?
© Sexymp 2019Terms of Service Privacy Policy DMCA DMCA Takedown Form 2257


text:
Wulf Outdoor Kawasaki
Find motorcycle dealers in Motorcycle USA's motorcycle dealer locator. Over 50,000 United States motorcycle dealerships are listed by state and motorcycle brands sold. You can contact, rate and review your local motorcycle dealerships. If we missed it, you can recommend your favorite motorcycle shop.
Wulf Outdoor Kawasaki
1141 Hurst St
Center, TX 75935-3015
Center, TX 75935-3015
Wulf Outdoor Kawasaki is a motorcycle dealership located in Center, TX selling Kawasaki motorcycles. Contact and map Wulf Outdoor Kawasaki through Motorcycle USA's Dealer Locator.
- wulfoutdoorsports.com
- Map It

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Click to enlarge
American Dart Lines, a Division of Bottelsen, has done it again. They have produced a excellent starter dart that is very durable and inexpensive. An incredible value. This is your chance to try out the Hammer Head tips for a fraction of the cost! All darts are sold in set of three.
The world record-holding patented Hammer Head No Bounce Dart comes assembled with nylon shafts and logo flights. Darts are packaged in a top box.
Buy Now


text:
Use mouse scroll wheel over image or pinch-to-zoom on touch devices. You can also click and drag around on image.
Mercedes C63 AMG Wagon
Parked toMercedes Benz
byADV.1 Wheels
ADV.1 Mercedes C63 AMG Wagon by Att-Tec & C.Kraft-Photography Wheel Specs: ADV5.2 M.V2 CS 50/50 Exposed Hardware Finish: Fine Texture Bronze 20x8.5 | 20x10
Vehicle Info: Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
KeywordsSign up to add your own keywords
More from this Profile:
Project 2017 Ford GT - SEMA Show
Garage Audi
Garage BMW


text:
We are looking at the thought of one body, many gifts; I Corinthians 12:12-31. I suppose that you have seen the television commercial with the rugged, bearded, strong, he-man type who runs around the woods with a big bear, have you seen that? I think it's Hamm's beer that does it. This guy is great big, with a beard, and he has a fuzzy bear that runs everywhere with him and paddles the canoe and all. There is a method in a commercial like that. It has a tremendous appeal to people because most people, generally, really admire rugged individualism. Here is a guy who has tamed a bear, who runs around the boondocks all by himself, and who doesn't need anything but a periodic deliveryman who drops off six-packs. Apart from that, he needs nothing.
When you look at the billboards of the Marlboro ad, it's the Marlboro man. One man, all alone on a horse, out in the middle of nowhere - it's rugged individualism. We honor people who go across the Atlantic in a dinghy, or who make amazing solo flights, or who climb Mount Everest. We have this mentality that says rugged individualism is the stuff that separates the men from the boys. The scientist who walks out of his laboratory after ten years and says, "Eureka!" and receives a prize for what he has discovered. There is something that appeals to us; there is something about the fact of doing something all alone, all by yourself, with nobody else, that says, "I have conquered everything. I don't need anyone else. I'm independent; I'm self-sufficient." That appeals to us. Do you know why that appeals to us? We are depraved.
You say, "What do you mean?" God wants us to have a tremendous sense of dependency. God wants us to be a family. Do you remember when Cain had slain his brother Abel, God said to him, "Where is Abel, thy brother? And he said, I know not: am I my brother's keeper?" Ever since the Fall, man has disdained the thought of responsibility for other people. Man has definitely wanted to be independent of any responsibility. That is one of the reasons that God, in the Old Testament, made an individual who sinned carry a weight of responsibility that hit a whole family, such as in the case of Achan, because God was getting a message across, and that message was, "Yes, you are your brother's keeper. Yes, you are dependent on other people. No, I don't want rugged individualism."
I believe that Satan, in response, has built into the heart of man this concept of independence, this concept of needing nothing and nobody, as being the epitome of life. When the fact of the matter is that this is the very opposite of what God wants. The philosophy of today is, "Do your own thing." The music of today is, "I did it my way." All of this echoes the same philosophy that is echoed by the man with the bear and the beer. You don't need anyone or anything; you are sufficient. It is Invictus, "I am the captain of my fate and the master of my soul."
I think this attitude pervades our society to the degree that it even gets its way into the church. We tend to translate it a little bit into our theology. We think that we, because we have Christ, are sufficient and we, because we have the Holy Spirit, are sufficient, and we really don't need anyone else. We have missed the point altogether. Since we don't live communally, as they did in the Old Testament when they lived in tribes, or as they did in the New Testament when they lived in the father's house, and since our independence, we have continuously fostered that same attitude, even as Christians. So, in the backlash of all of this, the church today struggles to try and regain the concept that the church is one body with many members. And that we have a tremendous responsibility for dependency on each other.
I was at Dallas Theological Seminary this week, speaking every day to the student body and the faculty. I was thrilled to be there; I thank God for that institution. They have over 1,000 young men training for the ministry and 54 on the faculty. I had to stand there and speak to all these people who are training for the ministry and checking me out. Sitting around me on the platform were 54 faculty members with their Greek texts open, finding out whether I had gotten the right jots and tittles and everything. I figured, "If I can just get in and out of here with my hide, I'll be alright," you know.
The first thing I said when I was there was to let them know that I had never been to the seminary in my life, I had never really met the faculty, and that I only knew a handful of the students. But I wanted them to know that my life and ministry would be eternally indebted to them. I said that the reason is because of the writing contribution of the faculty, and because I have studied under some who have studied under them. I pointed out the fact that all of us are so tremendously dependent upon others. Anyone who would think themselves to be independent, or a rugged individualist, is not really looking at the facts. Beyond the input we've already received, we have the same responsibility to minister back. So I told them, "In view of all that has been given to me from here, this week I hope I can give something back and mutually minister to you." That has to be, I think, the general attitude for the whole Christian life.
I suppose that there will be some people who will say, "Look at Jesus. He was a rugged individualist." Was He? Do you realize that Jesus spent the first 30 years of His life living with His family? I don't think He ever even left and got His own apartment. I think the first 30 years of His life were spent in the family; He lived with the family. The next three years of His life and ministry He spent with twelve men.
You say, "But Paul was a rugged individualist." No, I don't think Paul ever went anywhere without somebody. I don't like to go anywhere without somebody. I like to have someone to lean on, someone to minister to me, and someone to whom I can minister, pray with, share with, and labor with. Paul was that way. If you read the end of the book of Romans, Paul lists the names of the many people who helped him, who accompanied him, whom he loved, and who ministered to him, with him, and for him. Then in Colossians 4:7-17, there is a list of the names of people who ministered and cared and served and traveled with him and did all kinds of things. In II Timothy 4:9-21, there are more names. In the book of Acts, Paul starts out with Barnabas, then John Mark, then Silas, then Timothy, and then Luke. He's always got somebody. Someone was always sharing in the ministry with him, someone to whom he could minister, someone to whom he could pour out his heart, and someone for whom he could be a source of strength.
There is no place in God's plan or in biblical theology for rugged individualism. There is no reason to think that you are isolated. You are your brother's keeper. The New Testament is loaded with things that say you are your brother's keeper. There is no question about it. But, sadly, there are many Christians today who just don't get into the mainstream of this ministry. There are usually two problems. There are some Christians who feel inferior and unnecessary, so they sit on the fringe and don't ever become involved. Many of them, I'm sure, come to Grace Community Church. But God loves them, and so do their brothers and sisters in Christ. But they think they don't matter much, so they are just content to hang on the fringe and never get involved. But they short-circuit the ministry of the Spirit of God through their life to somebody desperately in need of it.
Then there are, on the other side, people who say, "Well, I am a spiritual celebrity and a modified spiritual superstar. I don't need all these people, I can go on my own." We all fight that kind of attitude. Sometimes, after I have preached a message, someone will come up to me and say, "You really blew it on that one." My first reaction is, "Who needs you, fella? I can handle it." Or else, I will come into my office on Monday and say to someone, "Great day yesterday. I really feel God blessed." Then I open my mail and someone writes, "You so-and-so." I think to myself, "Who needs it? I know what I'm doing. I don't need your criticism." But that's my first response. Then, after thinking about it, I say, "Well, Lord, they are probably right." And I begin to realize that God puts all of these people around me to minister to me, and to keep things in perspective. That is the way it has to be.
You have to realize that there is no place for the individualism of isolation or the individualism of a superstar kind of attitude, where you just don't bother to mingle with the peons. Both of those are wrong. There is a tremendous sense of interdependence in the body of Christ that defies the spirit of pride and the attitude of inferiority.
This is Paul's major message in I Corinthians 12. Let's look at it together. That's really what he's trying to say here, and he uses the familiar metaphor of a human body, then makes an application, and then a final appeal. So, these are the three points we want to look at: the analogy, the application, and the appeal. These three things will draw to a great truth, I think, this idea of interdependence and mutuality within the body of Christ.
In the last lesson we looked at Paul's analogy, that is, a body. An analogy is simply another way of saying something. He wants to state a spiritual truth but he says it in another way by using a human figure, or an illustration. His illustration is a human body. He develops the analogy along four lines. He says a human body illustrates unity, a human body illustrates diversity, a human body illustrates sovereignty, and a human body illustrates harmony. These four things sum up what a human body is and this illustrates what the church ought to be.
Remember unity in verses 12-13. He pointed out that the body is one, we've all received the same Spirit, we've all been placed in the same body, there is a beautiful unity, there aren't any higher or lower, greats and non-greats. There is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free. We all have the same Spirit; we're all in the same body. We've all been placed by the same Spirit. So, basically, Christians are one. There are not any upper- and lower-class Christians. There are not any highbrow and lowbrow Christians. There are no social strata involved. There is a beautiful unity. The body is one; we all have flowing through us the life of God, we all possess aionioszoe, eternal life. So we are one. There is a beautiful unity in the body of Christ, and a human body is the same way. There is a tremendous unity, a common life principle flowing through every cell in the human body.
Secondly, he says in his analogy, the body must have diversity, in verse 14. He says, "The body is not one member, but many." Here we see that is true about a body; it is one body and yet there are many members: eyes, ears, a mouth, arms, hands, feet, organs, and all the functions of the body are many, and yet the body is one. So this is his illustration. A body has unity and it has diversity. It must maintain its diversity in order to experience its unity.
Thirdly, we saw last time that a body has sovereignty. You see that, don't you, when your children are born? You talk with your wife or your husband and you say, "I wonder what our baby will look like." They now have X-rays where they are supposed to be able to determine many things, but basically, it's pretty fuzzy. I saw one of those a few days ago. I really couldn't tell a whole lot. I could see there was a fetus there, but I certainly couldn't tell anything else.
There are a lot of ways to test it, but you don't know what your baby is going to be like until all of a sudden the life is there, and then you have to say it is a sovereign design. God put the child together. If it is a perfectly whole baby with ears that stick out a little, with red hair, and a certain kind of nose, God made the baby in that way. There are genetic factors involved, but the child is still a creation of God, independent of any effort on your part. A body is designed by God. If the child is born with an infirmity, or a malformation, or is malfunctioning, again that has to be assigned to the sovereign allowance of God, something beyond your ability to control.
The same thing is true of the body of the church. The origination of the various members, their design, the way in which they are gifted, and the way they are placed into the body, is all dependent upon God.
Didn't we see that in verse 18? God has set the members. Verse 24, God has mixed them together. Verse 28, God has placed the leaders over them. So you have, then, unity, diversity, and sovereignty planned by God to make the body function. God has given us a sense of real dignity in this study, because we now understand that we are exactly what God made us to be, and that is exciting. He planned it all, He put it all together. Now, where those three things function, there will be a fourth, and that's harmony. But there will never be harmony until the other three are functioning.
In the case of the Corinthians, they really didn't experience unity, did they? Paul said to them in verses 12-13 that they ought to have unity because there was no such thing as either Jew or Greek or bond or free. They were all one. But they weren't acting that way.
In I Corinthians 1:10, he begs them right off the bat, "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment." In other words, "Get it together." According to verses 11-12, there were contentions, there were arguments over certain spiritual teachers.
In chapter 3, he repeats the same thing, saying that they were carnal because there was envy and strife. One was saying that he was of Paul, another of Apollos, they were carnal. In chapter 4, they were glorying as if they possessed something they had earned. They had spiritual pride. In chapter 6, they were suing each other in acts of antagonism, bitterness, resentment, and revenge. In chapter 8, they were using their liberty to defraud each other. They were stepping on the neck of the weaker brother in their pride and independence. In chapter 11, they came to the love feast to share their meal, and they ate their own food, so that when the poor came, there wasn't anything left for them to eat. There's selfishness again. So you can see there was anything but unity.
We come to chapter 12, and the implication here is that instead of ministering their gifts, the proud people were saying, "We are the only ones that matter." The humble people were saying, "We don't matter; we don't have the right gifts." So they were trying to seek for the ecstatic gifts and wound up with a pagan counterfeit. They had just destroyed the whole concept of unity.
Secondly, they didn't function in diversity. Here they are, in chapter 12, all trying to do the same thing. All trying to obtain the same ecstatic and showy gift instead of recognizing that God had ordered them to be independent, to be individual in the sense of their uniqueness. They were all trying to be the same, get the same ecstasy gift, get the same showy gift. Everybody was trying to be a spiritual hotshot.
Thirdly, they were denying sovereignty. Instead of accepting what God had given, they were discontent with what He had given and were seeking other gifts, manifestations, and experiences. So, they had violated all three; consequently, number four, harmony did not exist. Having straightened them out about unity in verses 12- 13, diversity in verse 14, and sovereignty in verses 18, 24, and 28, look at verse 15 and let's hear what he says about harmony.
Here's how he dives into this concept of harmony. He does it by showing the foolishness of anything other than harmony. He takes it from two angles: first, the people who thought they were nothing and envied the ones who had the showy gifts; and secondly, the people with the showy gifts who thought they were something and thought the other people were nothing. Let's look first of all at the people who feel themselves to be nothing, the gripers, the envious, the ones who felt cheated.
Verse 15; these are the foot people. "If the foot shall say, 'Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body'; is it, therefore, not of the body?" Does that make it true? Here's a foot, and the foot is not particularly beautiful or lovely. The foot is something that, if you are smart, you cover up. Especially if you happened to live in that day and age when the feet were what you walked with, and they were usually exposed. The foot was considered a rather ugly thing. So one might say, "I am just that out-of-the-way thing, usually covered by dirt and not seen. When I am seen, it's nothing worth seeing. Since I am not a hand, I am not a part of the body."
Now, what is this saying? What is the principle? The principle is this: no member, by complaining and depreciating his own importance, can accomplish removal from the body. Just because you think that you are not important, it does not eliminate your responsibility to function in the way that God called you. You cannot sit in a corner and say, "Since I am a foot, and I don't have what some others have, I am not going to do anything or be a part at all." That does not make you not a part, that only makes you disobedient. The principle is, you cannot remove yourself from a God-given responsibility simply because you are not happy with what you are. The foot felt clumsy and wanted to remove itself. But that isn't the way it is. God made you a foot, if that is what you are, because it is vital, critical.
I got a prayer request this morning to pray for a the little Johnson boy. He's four years old, and is going to have major surgery to try and correct his feet. They've asked us to pray for him because he needs to have his feet made functional, because the rest of him is so very dependent on those little feet. That's a vital thing, and to say that you don't want to be responsible for what you are doesn't relieve you of any responsibility; it only makes you disobedient.
Don't be intimidated. That is one of the things that we've seen in our study of Colossians, how the Charismatic movement intimidates a lot of feet. It says, "Because you aren't out there on display, doing the ecstatic and showy thing, you're not significant." That is exactly what was going on at Corinth. There were a lot of feet sitting in the background saying, "I wish I was an ear, or an eye, even a hand wouldn't be half bad. At least it's a little ways up the ladder." Look in verse 16, and you can see how it's only relative anyway. The foot is saying, "Oh, if I could only be an ear." Verse 16, "And if the ear shall say, 'Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body'; is it, therefore, not of the body?"
A little higher, and it is still relative. Some ear is saying, "I wish I could be an eye. But since I'm only an ear, I'm cutting out. I'm going to lay back. If I can't be an eye, I'm out of it. They don't need me." Does that remove you from responsibility? When a foot is jealous of a hand, does that remove the responsibility of the foot to be what it is? When the ear is jealous of the eye, does that eliminate its responsibility? Not in God's eyes, it doesn't.
Whatever your gift is, it is essential, it is needed, and God wants it. It has to be there and it has to operate. There is no sense sitting in a corner, on the fringes, saying, "Well, I don't have that much to offer anyway; there's no sense in me getting involved." But so many Christians do that. Some of you do it. Some of you have been doing it for years. You have never known the joy of ministry because you just thought nobody wanted feet or ears. But that isn't so.
Look at verse 17. "If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?" It would not make a lot of sense, would it? If everybody had the same gift, it would be ridiculous. Yet isn't it amazing that people today keep telling us that we all need to get the same gifts? It's not true. There is no place for envying another gift. I Corinthians 13:4 says, "Love envies not." There just isn't any place for that, but for contentedness.
You cannot have one organ. The body cannot be an eye, or an ear, or a nose. One organ, no matter how prominent it is, cannot survive alone. You can't cut off your ear, set it down, and say, "I have to leave. Would you hang around and listen? Maybe you can pick up some information while I'm gone." It doesn't do that. You can't pluck out your eye and have it look around for you while you are sleeping. There is no such thing as a spiritual loner.
There is a tremendous sense of dependence in the body of Christ. In Grace Community Church, there are a number of people behind the scenes who make it possible for me to speak to you. All the people who type up things for me, all the people who give me input, and all the people who turn machines on and off, and plug things in, they make it all possible; they squirt off the patio and clean the parking lot. You didn't know we clean the parking lot? We do. There are a lot of other things that go on behind the scenes that you never even know about that make it all possible. Do you know how many people who take upon themselves responsibilities, that normally would be mine, in order to free me to prepare so that I can minister to you? Without those people, I would not be able to say what I say to you, and you would not be able to receive what I say and grow. As a result, the whole idea of ministry would be reduced. It's vital. You can't start putting price tags on gifts.
So, Paul says that all members cannot be the same. Verse 18. That's why God set the members the way it pleased Him; He didn't leave the body for us to figure out. He didn't say, "Get organized!" He said, "Be an organism and I will run it." Verse 19 says, "If they were all one member, where were the body?" If everyone were the same, we would not have a body. But the Corinthians were saying, "We all have to chase after tongues. We all have to speak in prophecies. We all have to experience ecstasies." They were all going like mad after the same gifts. So Paul says, "All that you are going to end up with is one great big eye."
That isn't how it is. So he sums up his main point in verse 20. "Now are they many members, yet but one body." That's his point. From verses 15-20, his point is, "Don't think yourself inferior. Do not underestimate your importance." In verses 21-25, he says, "Don't think yourself superior. Do not overestimate your importance."
Look at verse 21. We've gone from the foot, to the hand, to the ear, to the eye; now we are moving from the eye, to the ear, to the hand, to the foot. We are going backwards from the other side. "And the eye cannot say unto the hand, 'I have no need of thee;' nor again the head to the feet, 'I have no need of you.'" Now we're going back down the line from the viewpoint of superiority.
This was what was going on in the Corinthian assembly; they were overestimating their importance. The people who were doing the fancy, showy, public speaking gifts were assuming that they did not need the other people, that those people were nothing. They were the superstars, they were the celebrities, they were the superiors, they were the leaders, they were the hotshots. The rest of the people could just disintegrate into nothingness and oblivion and it would have had no effect. That isn't right. Verse 21. You can't say, "I have no need of you." There is a tremendous sense of dependence.
Now he's going to expand this thought, and he's going to say some most fascinating things. Verse 22. "No, much more those members of the body which seem to be more feeble, are necessary." Eyes and ears and hands and feet are nice, but you know something shocking? You can live without eyes, ears, hands, and feet. Even the ones that are showy, external, and strong, you can live without them. But there are weak members that you can't live without; they are more vital.
Notice verse 22. Paul talks about the members of the body that are "more feeble." That means that they are weaker. Now, in this metaphor, we are moving deeper into the body. Since verse 21 is dealing with hands and feet and eyes and ears (the outward), this part of the metaphor takes us deeper into the less showy, the less obvious, the less out-front, the less comely, the less prominent ones. They are more feeble, but they are necessary.
What are these? They are the internal organs of the body: the lungs, the stomach, the liver, the kidneys, and all the other organs. That's what he has in mind. These internal organs, completely hidden from view, are vital and essential to sustaining life. They are weaker in this sense. The only protection afforded them is from the other parts of the body.
I was watching the football game yesterday between Texas and Oklahoma. I was noticing what you always notice when you see football players: the tremendous padding that they wear. I remember the days when I used to put all that on, but it isn't just a question of padding. They work out with weights, weights, and more weights. They exercise too. Why? So that their physical bodies on the outside are strong, and the muscle is tense and tight. So that, when they are hit with blow after blow after blow, it doesn't mess them up on the inside. They strengthen the outward members to protect the weaker members, which have no protection other than that which is afforded on the outside.
Paul is saying, "There are some members who are so feeble that they are totally dependent on the protection of some of the other members. They are not intended to be out front." You wouldn't live very long if you went around with your lungs hanging outside. They would not be able to handle the environment.
When I think about that, I think about the support ministries, particularly the secretaries at Grace Community Church. This church is a very intense place during the week. We have four or five crises a day. There are crises and deadlines all the time. I believe that the secretaries who work here, for the most part, would never be able to maintain a sense of mental balance if they didn't have some of us to protect them from the onslaught. Sometimes the frustrations mount, and since they are the gentler members of the body, they need the protection of someone else. They will function smoothly and effectively as long as that protection is there. But if the staff walked away and left all of the onslaught to hit them, it would be a little difficult. They are the members who are necessary and vital. You don't even know who they are, and you may not ever see them, but believe me, we're all here because they are there.
Let me go a step further. Verse 23. He's getting in even deeper in his analogy. "And those members of the body, which we think to be less honorable, upon these we bestow more abundant honor; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness." That's a very interesting verse; watch what happens here.
The Corinthians had failed to be kind, considerate, and protective of those who did not have the gift of prophecy, or the gift of languages, or the gift of healing, the out-front gifts. They had failed to be kind, to be considerate, to protect the weaker ones, according to verse 22. So, in verse 23 Paul says, "Don't you realize that even a human body compensates for its less comely members?"
Now what does Paul mean by the two terms 'less honorable' and 'uncomely'? Uncomely means ugly, that's about the best definition of it. Now, it doesn't mean horrible-looking, ugly things, it just means 'the less beautiful parts.' What do the less honorable and less beautiful parts refer to? Two different things.
Most commentators assume this to be the middle part of your body - your trunk, hips, shoulders, thighs - the part you put your clothes on. You basically do that because your face is alright. It is nice to look at and enjoy, people can look at it. And your hands are fine to look at, and so are your feet. But you cover up certain parts of your body because it's not so alright. They need a little help. So it is just a normal, human response, to fix up the parts that need it. You adapt and do what you need to do.
Every once in a while, I'll look at a magazine on an airplane. Some magazine articles will tell you, depending on your build, what kind of clothes to wear. If you are a little wide in a particular place, don't wear the squares, wear the stripes. That is the way people compensate to cover the less honorable parts, and you wind up bestowing more honor on them. You might throw down your charge card and buy $75 dollars worth of abundant honor to drape over your less honorable parts. I do it too; that's just how it is. That is compensation. That's what he's saying. What is the principle? The less the natural grace and appeal, the greater the effort to adorn it. Sure. But now, let's go a step further.
We have discussed the external, which doesn't need much adornment; then we discussed the more feeble parts - the internal organs which are protected by the strength of the others; and then we discussed the parts of your body that you need to put a little honor on. Now he goes a step further.
"And our uncomely." The Greek word for 'uncomely' means 'indecent.' In other words, our indecent parts have more abundant comeliness. He says that it is a normal human reaction to cover the private or indecent parts of the human body, not just for the sake of adornment, but for the sake of modesty with even a greater amount of effort. To show you how far away we have gone from what is normally human, just look at our society today, when those parts of the human body which mankind has long known to be private, and which ought to be covered with honor so that they can be held in modesty, are now exploited. That just shows how far our depravity has gone.
The point is this: the behind-the-scenes part of the body gets the special effort and attention and devotion. Paul is saying, "It is not the place for the highbrow parts of the body to say, 'I don't need you.' That part of the body ought to say, 'I know that I am the only protection you have. I want to care for you and bestow more honor on you. And the more you need that honor, the more I want to give you that honor.' Instead of running around with the attitude of spiritual, rugged individualism, we really should be busy making sure that we stop to honor the people who don't normally receive the honor." That's what he's saying. That is the kind of love that Paul talks about in I Corinthians 13. It isn't running around with a sense of spiritual independence, but constantly acknowledging your gratitude for those parts of the church of Jesus Christ that maybe don't receive all the glamor and appeal and press. But they are there, and they are vital. They need us to love them, protect them, and honor them.
So it goes both ways. God doesn't want you people who are those parts sitting in the corner thinking they are nothing, and He doesn't want the other people thinking they are everything, but rather passing the honor around where it belongs. Dr. Robert Thomas says, "It is a distorted sense of values when a Christian, well known because of his well received speaking gift, looks disparagingly at other Christians who possess no such gift. This is direct contradiction of the principle of self-concern that characterizes any body. It is far more consistent with the principle of self-preservation that members possessing greater beauty and functional ability devote themselves tirelessly to the well-being of those not so well equipped."
That is a beautiful statement, and that is essentially what Paul is saying. Instead of thinking ourselves sufficient and independent, it is up to us to come down and minister to you, and for you to respond to that ministry by ministering to us in return. And it is for us to say, "We want to help you where you are weak and to strengthen you where you need to be strong." That is the kind of thing Paul wants. Believe me, we ought to recognize the necessity of this because God sees a beautiful equality in the body.
Verse 24. "For our comely parts have no need." The out-front part, we don't mess with. "But God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honor to that part which lacked."
You may be a beautiful eye, ear, hand, or foot, but you could be cut off and the rest of the body would still make it. But if you happen to be one of the vital organs, we can't mess with you because you are too important. This is how God equalizes things. The people out front with the showy gifts, in the long run, when the judgment is in and the rewards are given, aren't nearly as vital as the people underneath with the support ministries.
I think one of the most exciting events of the ages, and I'm convinced one of the most shocking experiences we will ever have is the bema seat, when we go there and see who gets the rewards. I think most of us will be shocked, if there is such a thing as shock there. Jesus said, "For he that is least among you all, the same shall be great and the one who is the servant of all will be the one who receives the greatest honor."
There are some of us who are eyes and ears and mouths and noses; we are the comely parts, doing our thing, but God equalizes it because the less conspicuous members are the more essential to life. Nobody ever sees anyone else's internal organs, so we usually think of people in terms of outward beauty, but that isn't what makes them what they are. The same thing is true in the church. God wants all the honor equalized. So verse 25 will be a reality.
"That there should be no schism in the body, but that the members should have the same care one for another. And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honored, all the members rejoice with it." God wants us all equalized. God wants this beautiful unity. He has made these truths of compensation in order that there might be a real unity.
When your body suffers, you don't say, "Well, this half of me is suffering but this half feels terrific." If any part of you suffers, you're all in it. And if any part of you is happy, your whole being is rejoicing. If we are truly sharing, that is the way it will be in the body of Christ.
So Paul says, "Don't feel inferior! You are vital; God will balance. You are necessary, you are important, you are to be rewarded for faithfulness. And don't feel superior! You may be the out-front, good-looking part, and that's good, that's your part for now, that's your ministry for now, and there are certain blessings attendant with that, but you cannot disdain the other parts, because they are the more necessary to life." So rivalry is impossible in the body of Christ. The only thing that is possible is love, and that becomes Paul's theme in the next chapter.
That's the analogy, now let's look at the application. We'll just briefly comment on it, because it's so obvious. Verse 27. Having given that analogy, he makes application. "Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular." I've been talking about you the whole time. You're that body; you're those members. You're the issue here.
A footnote of interest. It is interesting that Paul calls one local congregation "the body of Christ." What is he saying? Is Paul saying, "You are the whole body of Christ, and everyone else is outside of the body?" Or is he saying, "You are one body of Christ, and there is another body in this town, and another body in that town?" No, there is only one body. Paul is saying, "You are a proper, miniature representation of the body of Christ." You know what's so exciting about that? He is saying to them, "You, as a local assembly, you can manifest the fullness of the body of Christ locally." That is so encouraging to me.
In the first chapter of I Corinthians, Paul said, "You come behind in no gift." Isn't it thrilling to know that each local assembly of believers is given, by the Spirit of God, all that is necessary to truly represent the body of Christ so that His image may be seen in the world? We don't need to say, "We are half of the body over here and the other half is down in San Diego. If we could just get together, we could get the whole thing rolling." But God manifests the total picture in individual congregations, and supplies each one with all they need.
So, Paul says, "You are the body, and you are the members I'm talking to. Yours is the unity that is the issue here. God has made you one, and He has poured you together in an act of diversity. You are what you ought to be and God has sovereignly done it."
Verse 28. "And God hath set some in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers; after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of languages. You're exactly the ones I'm talking about. It's your unity I'm speaking of. It's your diversity I'm speaking of. I want you to recognize God's sovereignty." Look at verse 29. "Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? Have all the gifts of healing? Do all speak with languages? Do all interpret?"
Now, what is the answer to every question? No. Paul says in verse 27, "Remember your unity. You are the body I am talking about." In verse 28, "Remember your diversity. You are the ones with all of these gifts." In verses 29-30, he says, "Remember God's sovereignty. He doesn't want you all to be apostles, or prophets, or teachers, or miracle workers, or healers, or all of you to speak in languages or interpreting."
Paul confronts them at the same three points: unity, diversity, and sovereignty. "Why are all of you trying to be noses and ears and eyes? Why do you all want to be apostles, prophets, teachers, miracle workers, tongues speakers, healers, and all the showy stuff? Don't you know God has called some of you to be teachers and helpers and workers in the area of government or administration? It is all sovereign. You have nothing to seek for; you have nothing to be envious of; and you have nothing to be proud about and so to disdain the others. Let there be harmony." The sovereignty of God. Where the should be unity, diversity, and sovereignty, and as a result, harmony. So Paul applies the analogy.
Last, he makes a final appeal. Verse 31. This is a verse misunderstood by many. Let me read you the traditional King James. "But covet earnestly the best gifts; and yet show I unto you a more excellent way." When you read that verse you want to say, "Hold it right now. You have to be kidding. You mean that Paul just spent all of those verses saying to be content with the gift you have, and now he turns right around and says to covet earnestly the better gifts?" Literally, 'the showy gifts.' This verse is used by people from the Pentecostal tradition to prove that we ought to seek the gift of tongues and other gifts because this verse says to covet earnestly the best gifts. They say that it is a command.
When I look at that verse, I say, "It cannot be." Paul would not spend all this time in verses 1-30 saying, "Be content with what you have. Don't seek another gift. It has all been accomplished by God's sovereign plan. Just take the gift you have and use it. Don't feel inferior. Don't feel superior," and then say, "Go covet the showy gifts." Oh no. What is Paul saying? Let me read it to you in two parts as simply as I can.
The second part reads this way. "And yet show I unto you a more excellent way." What was the way they were doing it? No unity, no sense of diversity (everybody was seeking the same gift), no sense of sovereignty, they were not willing to accept God's plan. So Paul says, "I'm showing you a more excellent way: unity, diversity, sovereignty, harmony. I'm trying to show you a more excellent way, and I'm not done yet. I'm going to show you that the cap on this whole thing is that it all functions in love. This is the more excellent way."
You say, "But what about that first statement?" In the Greek, there is an indicative, which is a statement of fact, and an imperative, which is a command. The form they take in the Greek is the very same; there is no difference. So, in the Greek, this verse is either a command or a statement; there is no difference in the form. It either says, "Covet earnestly the best gifts," or it says, "But you are coveting the showy gifts." Now which of these do you think fits the context? There is no question. "But you are coveting the best gifts and yet I show you a more excellent way." The Greek verb zeloonormally has a bad connotation, and that's the word 'to covet.' So, the indicative sense is the normal sense of the Greek in this passage and fits the context, and it should be translated this way: "But you are coveting the showy gifts, and yet I am showing you a more excellent way."
Do you see the point? Paul is not saying to chase after spiritual gifts; he is saying, "You are chasing after spiritual gifts, and that is what is wrong with you. Stop doing it, and do the excellent thing. Accept the unity, diversity, sovereignty, and harmony that God has already planned, presented, and built into the body." And the way it all operates, the key to every bit of it is love. Let's pray.
Thank You, Father, for our time this morning. Thank You for ministering to us in Your Word. We pray that these truths might find root in our hearts and spring up to faithful ministry and bear fruit. We will give You the praise. In Jesus' name, Amen.
This article is also available and sold as a booklet.
This sermon series includes the following messages:
Please contact the publisher to obtain copies of this resource.Publisher Information


text:
James W. Duxbury, 60, of Upper Mount Bethel Township, passed away Monday, Feb. 18, 2013, at his residence.
James was born in East Orange, N.J., on July 13, 1952, and was the son of the late Walter and Harriet (Ott) Duxbury.
He was the husband of Martha Jean (Gately) Duxbury. They would have celebrated their 40th wedding anniversary this coming April.
He was a self-employed merchant in the Bangor area, and an avid New York Yankees fan.
James was a graduate of West Essex High School in North Caldwell, N.J.
He was a member of Trinity United Church of Christ in Mount Bethel.
In addition to his wife, Martha, James is survived by two sons: Daniel Duxbury and his wife, Deborah, and Jedidiah Duxbury and his fianc�e, Jacqueline Beels; a sister, Beth Donnamaria and her husband, Dave; two grandsons, Trevor and Dalton Duxbury; his nieces, Britney and Danielle; and his two dogs, Rocky and Jeter.
In addition to his parents, he was predeceased by his sister, Diane.
Call hours will be from 6 to 8 p.m. Friday, Feb. 22, at Gaffney Parsons Funeral Home & Cremation Services Inc., 4 Lillian Lane, Village of Johnsonville, Bangor. Funeral services will be at 11 a.m. Saturday at the funeral home. Burial will be at Reformed Cemetery, Upper Mount Bethel Township.
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to Trinity United Church of Christ, 632 S. Delaware Drive, Mount Bethel, PA 18343.
Gaffney Parsons Funeral Home & Cremation Services
4 Lillian Lane
Village of Johnsonville, Bangor
James W. Duxbury
James W. Duxbury, 60, of Upper Mount Bethel Township, passed away Monday, Feb. 18, 2013, at his residence.


text:
ScamWatch combats "phishing" schemes that use disguised URL's to gather personal information. Eudora now detects if the URL in the link differs suspiciously from the host name and warns you to exercise caution before making the connection.
Version 8 is now open source and based on Thunderbird. The project's intention was to join the Eudora® user experience with the Mozilla platform. The developers intended to produce a version of Eudora, which is open source and based on Mozilla and Thunderbird. It's *not* their intention to compete with Thunderbird; rather, they wanted to complement it. As such, the team at Eudora are committed to preserving the Eudora experience and also maintaining maximum compatibility with Thunderbird. The overall goal is to continue to build around a single development community for Thunderbird and Eudora.
The following describes the changes in the software since Eudora 8.0. Separate
sections have been given to changes from each release since then. The changes
are only for Eudora and Penelope, and all changes made by Thunderbird are not
listed. Changes to Thunderbird can be found here:
CHANGES IN 8.0.0b1
Includes Penelope version 0.1a21.
Synced to the THUNDERBIRD_2_0_0_6_RELEASE code branch:
- Toolbar icons (and a few other icons) from the original Eudora were moved
to Penelope.
- Keyboard shortcuts from the original Eudora were moved to Penelope. You
can configure whether these shortcuts in Penelope or the original
Thunderbird ones are used in the Penelope panel of the Options/Preferences
- The menu structure of original Eudora has been copied to a great extent
in Penelope.
- Added the ability to display the list of mailboxes in a separate window
from the mailboxes themselves, which was similar to the original Eudora.
This can be configured in the Penelope panel of the Options/Preferences
dialog. Mailboxes opened in a separate window have their size/position
remembered and restored when opened up next.
- Double-clicking or hitting Enter/Return on a mailbox in the folders list
now opens up the mailbox in a separate window.
- The toolbar customization dialog was modified to be similar to the way it
was implemented in original Eudora.
- Modified the mailbox column headers to look like original Eudora's.
- The "Sender" column has been relabeled as "Who", and outgoing messages
display the name of the recipient there. This feature can be controlled by
the hidden pref "mail.useWhoColumn".
- You can quickly find messages in a mailbox by typing text in the list of
messages. As you type the selection in the mailbox will change based on
matching text in the Who and Subject fields. After finding a match you can
use the period key to find subsequent matches in the mailbox (and
Shift+period to find previous matches).
- Added the Group Select feature from original Eudora where if you hold down
the Alt key (option for Mac) and click the left mouse button down on an item
in the mailbox it will select all messages that have the same value as the
item clicked on, and all of those selected messages will be grouped together.
For example, Alt/option-clicking on the name of a sender of a message will
select all of the messages in that mailbox sent by that person, and move
the messages together. Note that the moving of messages in the mailbox list
will break the current sort of the mailbox. The Shift key can be used as a
modifier to make the selected messages remain in their original positions in
the mailbox list, and thus retain the current sort order.
- Importing mailboxes and messages from the original Eudora in to the new
Eudora has been substantially improved under Windows. Import times are now 5
times shorter. Basic message attributes and status are now maintained
(read/unread, priority, label). Inline images in messages now get moved over.
Includes fixes to the following bugs:
301188: "Import Eudora mail fails to find attachments in other directories"
368360: "Importer (Win Eudora, Mail) does not import mailboxes with unusual leading characters"
380408: "Mail Import Crashes with Divide by Zero"
- Now filters can be imported from original Eudora to the new Eudora. There
is not a one-to-one match up of original Eudora's filtering capabilities and
those found in Thunderbird, so not all filters will move over exactly.
Filters imported that will lose some capabilities will be warned about in a
list after the entire filter import process is complete. Also added was the
"Stop Filter Execution" action. This is the equivalent to original Eudora's
"Skip Rest" action which causes the filtering process to end for messages
that match the criteria in the filter with this action.
- Improvements to the importing of original Eudora Windows Address Books have
been made.
Includes fixes to the following bugs:
368626: "Importer (Win Eudora, Address Book). Mailing list nickname not assigned to 'nickname' in Penelope"
368630: "Importer (Win Eudora, Address Book). Variouos fields not mapped to Penelope Address Book fields"
368634: "Importer (Win Eudora, Address Book). Unable to import if Eudora is using '.nnt' format"
377816: "Importer (Win Eudora, Address Book) incorrectly adds additional entries when resolving nicknames in mailing lists"
377821: "Importer (Win Eudora, Address Book) fails to resolve nicknames with spaces when importing a mailing list"
377945: "Importer (Win Eudora, Address Book) misses information when importing an alias (mailing list with one entry)"
- Importing on the Mac now looks for a Eudora folder in the user's document
folder (i.e. ~/Documents) in addition to the System Folder and the System
Documents Folder.
- Added original Eudora-like IMAP auto-expunge behavior. This is controlled
by the hidden pref "mail.imap.expunge_option". It can have values for if
auto-expunging should occur never (0), always (1), or on a threshold (2). If
on a threshold is set, then auto-expunge will occur when there are at least
20 messages waiting to be expunged. The number of messages for that threshold
is actually controlled by the hidden pref "mail.imap.expunge_threshold_number".
- Added a "Refresh Folder List" item to the context menu for IMAP folders which
gets the current list of folders/mailboxes from the IMAP server and updates the
folder tree for that IMAP account.
- Added support for viewing only messages that are not deleted in IMAP
mailboxes. Use the "Not Deleted" item in the View->Messages menu or the
Mail Views control on the toolbar.
- New mail sound copied from original Eudora.
- Added "Make Address Book Entry" functionality (in Tools menu).
- Added the "SelectedTextURL" feature from original Windows Eudora, which allows
selected text to easily be inserted in to a URL and launched. Menu items for
them are located in the Tools menu, and they also get keyboard shortcuts
associated with them as well. Use the hidden prefs "penelope.selectedTextURL#",
where # is an increasing number in sequence. Here's the default values:
pref("penelope.selectedTextURL1", "Google,http://www.google.com/search?q=%s");
pref("penelope.selectedTextURL2", "Dictionary,http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=%s");
pref("penelope.selectedTextURL3", "Thesaurus,http://www.thesaurus.com/cgi-bin/search?config=roget&words=%s");
- Fixed "Bug 161775 - Reply shouldn't quote inline attachments":


text:
Former Dolphins tackle Lydon Murtha has written a column for TheMMQB.com regarding the things he witnessed and the things he believed regarding the relationship between Dolphins guard Richie Incognito and Dolphins tackle Jonathan Martin. Characterized as a first-person account, it's clear there are several key aspects on which Murtha wouldn't have had first-hand information.
And so the biggest question becomes, on those points, where did he get the information?
Indeed, Murtha's factual perspective is limited. He played for the Dolphins through August 31, 2012, which means that he observed the interactions between Incognito and Martin only through the 2012 offseason program (following Martin's arrival via the draft), training camp, and the preseason.
Murtha says, presumably based on his experiences, that Martin didn't "seem to want to be one of the group," and that he "came off as standoffish and shy" to the rest of the lineman. Murtha says that Martin "couldn't look anyone in the eye, which was puzzling for a football player at this level on a team full of grown-ass men."
Fair translation? The "grown-ass men" in the locker room viewed Martin as different, as not tough, and ultimately as soft. Which meshes with the notion that, instead of accepting Martin for who he is, players (and possibly coaches) wanted to make Martin more like them.
In insisting that Incognito didn't bully Martin, Murtha claims that everyone gave Martin a hard time: "Other players said the same things Incognito said to Martin, so you'd need to suspend the whole team if you suspend Incognito."
That could be good for Incognito, but bad for the Dolphins.
The bigger problem with Murtha's proclamation that Incognito didn't bully Martin is that Murtha seems to be applying his own interpretation of what "bullying" is. To support his position, Murtha writes that Martin was never singled out or treated differently or excluded.
At the same time, Murtha never really addresses the question of whether the verbal interactions between Incognito and Martin crossed the line. Murtha comes close, pointing out that he knows "when a guy can't handle razzing" and that "Incognito doesn't have that filter," but Murtha never comments on whether Incognito exposed Martin to "razzing" that Martin may not have been able to handle.
The column then careens off the rails when Murtha in his supposed first-person account starts to offer conjecture about things he didn't actually experience. For example, Murtha declares the voice message sent earlier this year from Incognito to Martin — months after Murtha was cut — "came from a place of humor."
How can Murtha possibly know that as part of a first-person account? The more accurate explanation is that someone else (possibly Incognito) told this to Murtha.
Murtha also disputes the suggestion that Incognito improperly squeezed $15,000 out of Martin to pay for a trip to Las Vegas with no facts, and no proof. Per multiple league and media sources, the trip happened in 2013. Murtha was long gone by then, and yet Murtha uses his first-person account to create the impression that he has conclusive first-hand evidence of what happened.
He doesn't. Anything he said about it came from someone else. Possibly Incognito.
And that's where the column gets very interesting, but for reasons Murtha likely didn't intend. If, as it appears, someone else is funneling information to Murtha, someone else may have funneled this information, too: "Incognito was made a scapegoat for the hell coming down on the Dolphins organization, which in turn said it knew nothing about any so-called hazing. That's the most outlandish lie of this whole thing. The coaches know everything. The coaches know who's getting picked on and in many cases call for that player to be singled out. Any type of denial on that side is ridiculous."
If Murtha is getting that information from Incognito, get ready for Incognito to officially claim that he was merely doing what he thought he was supposed to do as a team leader, and that management either told him to do it or at a minimum knew he was doing it.
That could be good for Incognito, but bad for the Dolphins.


text:
Vatican City, Oct 17, 2012 / 04:41 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York will be part of a papal delegation to Syria that will voice "fraternal solidarity" with the Syrian people and encourage peace amid the country's violent conflict.
The Holy See's Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, said Oct. 16 that the world's Catholic bishops cannot be "mere spectators of a tragedy such as the one that is now unfolding in Syria."
He said a political answer is "the only possible solution to the crisis." The Syrian population and displaced persons have endured "immense suffering."
He said the delegation will travel to Damascus next week.
"In the meantime we pray that reason and compassion might prevail," Cardinal Bertone said.
Fighting between rebels and the Syrian government has killed an estimated 30,000 people.
Syria's Christians tend to support the government, given the fate they expect to suffer if Islamists take control. Rebels have targeted Christians, bombing several churches and driving tens of thousands of them from their homes.
Lakhdar Brahimi, a peace envoy from the United Nations and the Arab League, is presently touring the region to try to find a solution to the conflict. He arrived in Lebanon Oct. 17 after visiting Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.
He is seeking a three-day ceasefire for the Muslim holiday Eid, which is observed on Oct. 26. The rebel Free Syrian Army has rejected the proposal on the grounds it would allow the government to prepare more offensives. The Syrian National Council, which opposes the government, has tentatively welcomed the proposal.
On Oct. 17 at the Synod of Bishops on the New Evangelization, he said the group will show "human solidarity towards people who are suffering." It will also express spiritual solidarity.
The delegation aims to find a solution to the conflict.
"We must help those who are in charge of society and the general political landscape," the cardinal said, according to Vatican Radio.
In addition to Cardinals Dolan and Tauran, the delegation will include Cardinal Laurent Mosengwo Pasinya of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo; Bishop Fabio Suescun Mutis, military ordinary of Colombia; and Bishop Joseph Nguyen Nang of Phat Diem, Vietnam.
Vatican officials in the delegation include Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, the Holy See's Secretary for Relations with States, and Msgr. Alberto Ortega of the Secretariat of State.


text:
College Insignia
The Bethany Lutheran College seal, logo, and mascot all speak to the proud purpose and heritage of the institution.
The college seal was made official by a resolution of the Board of Regents in 1932. The idea of the college seal originated with Ruth Seidel, who was an instructor at Bethany, and her artist brother, Wilbur Seidel of Chicago, who furnished the detailed drawing.
The seal is distinctive and most appropriate. The inscription ("henos estin chreia,") is Greek and means "One Thing Is Needful," the words of Christ spoken to Martha at that first Bethany. The "One Thing Needful" is the Gospel of the crucified Savior, expressed by the cross upon which the inscription is placed. For Bethany Lutheran College we thereby wish to declare that there is no true education, even as there is no salvation, without the Gospel of Christ, Son of God and Savior of the world from sin. That Gospel is, and must remain, the heart and soul of every educational effort at our beloved institution. The cross is encircled by a star with twelve points, upon which are shown rays of light extending from the cross. As the twelve apostles were commissioned to be bearers of the light from the cross, so the goal of our training at Bethany must not be our own advancement, but the spread of the Gospel.
The Bethany Lutheran College logo reflects the institution's continuing committment to the cross of Christ as the central foundation for learning. The prominent steeple of Trinity Chapel, clearly visible to much of Mankato, shows here the college's unabashed love for the Gospel message. Bethany's Norwegian heritage can be seen in the white crossbars, which echo the flag of Norway. With a nod to the school song, the logo shows Bethany overlooking the Minnesota River from "high amid the trees" on McMahan Hill.
The logo was designed and adopted in 1997, and slightly revised in 2004.
Institutional logos for download
Mascot and school colors
With its strong Norwegian heritage, the Viking was a clear choice for the Bethany Lutheran College mascot.
Bethany's athletic colors are red, white, and black.
The Bethany Song
High amid the trees we stand,
Bethany, oh guide of youth,
Pointing up with kindly hand,
Filling hearts and minds with truth.
When we leave your sheltered side,
May we all your hopes fulfill;
May your lessons e'er abide,
May your hand point upward still.


text:
Welcome to Jefferson County Ohio's Internet web site.
We now offer a Real Estate Lookup?
- Click here to access
We now offer On-Line Dog Tag Look-Up?
- Click here to perform a search
You can search court cases?
- Click here to Search Common Pleas
- Click here to Search County Courts
Jefferson County is pleased to announce that the Real Estate Plats are now available on-line via our GIS system. Click here to access them.


text:
Northern Rise Village Services Pty Ltd
Contact Details
224 Lord Street
Perth WA 6000
+61 8 9223 6782
Other Locations
Company Profile
Northern Rise is a wholly Australian owned company offering a single service solution to a wide variety of industries. Providing accommodation, catering, support and property services to the resources, construction, tourism and government industry sectors throughout Australia. We provide a customer focused, hospitality based service that is designed to deliver a greater sense of community within each village. This is achieved by introducing tangible change in our guest experience encompassing friendly welcoming staff, menu design and food quality, village cleanliness and guest well being. Our flexible collaborative approach to providing operational and commercial solutions is tailored to meet the operating demands of each individual client.
Products and Services
Accommodation management
Health and lifestyle leadership
Property management, maintenance and gardening
Housekeeping, cleaning and laundry
Transportation and airport management
Waste management, recycling, sewerage and water treatment operations


text:
Send Results to This Email:
Street Address:
Street Address:
Dana and Ray Brandon
Ray's Take Saving is hard. There are so many temptations when you have to make a conscious decision to put money aside each paycheck. For many, the money goes straight into a checking account, and then flows right out again to pay an endless stream of bills.
If something is left over it might go into savings, but how often is something left over? Our intentions are good, but even with modern technology easing the way, inertia is still a powerful force: An object at rest tends to stay at rest.
I'm a big believer in PYF, the "pay yourself first" philosophy – before you pay all your bills and expenses, you should save something for yourself first, not last. After all, isn't your future at least as important as all those other responsibilities? So why not save to secure it?
Putting your savings plan on automatic is the easiest way to make "pay yourself first" a reality. It's easier to save when the process is something you don't have to think about – there are no additional steps to take, and the decision of what to save has already been made. Even better, when you don't see the money in the first place, you're far less likely to miss it.
The first step is to contribute the maximum to your retirement plan, not just enough to get any match. It's hard to spend money that you never "get." After that, you should set up an automatic draft from your checking account to your investment accounts. Most mutual funds are glad to set these up.
Try to automatically save as much as you can, but even if it is little as $50 a month, you're creating the habit of regular investing. When you get a raise, be sure to "raise" your PYF. At some point you can calculate in more detail exactly how much you need to save for various goals, but at least you're already saving.
Make automatic savings your first tool to "pay yourself first," and you'll be surprised at how quickly the money accrues.
Dana's Take To instill the idea of saving, or "paying yourself first," in your children, take advantage of their natural love for ritual and tradition.
As soon as you start giving a child an allowance, make it clear that part of that allowance is to be saved for the future. However, don't just hold that money for her. Have your child place it herself in a special bank or container so that she can see it grow.
You might even add some aspirational statement to the occasion, something like: "What I'm saving will get me a bicycle/video game/whatever." By doing this every time your child receives an allowance, you are instilling the idea of saving as a positive force from the very start. That can only serve well for the future.
Ray Brandon is a certified financial planner and CEO of Brandon Financial Planning (www.brandonplanning.com). His wife Dana has a Bachelor's in Finance and is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW). Contact Ray Brandon at firstname.lastname@example.com.
Copyright 1995 -
by The Daily News Publishing Co. Inc. - All Rights Reserved


text:
Katheryn Jones Ministries and Destiny Family Services is hosting an Evening of Gospel with Nakitta Foxx of the Kurt Carr Singers and Bishop-Elect, Prophet Antoine Jasmine. The event is scheduled for Saturday, July 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM. The venue is Ray of Hope Christian Center, 2778 Snapfinger Road in Lithonia.
This is a benefit fundraiser for the Sons and Daughters with Destiny Youth Leadership Academy that serves At-Risk Youth in the DeKalb County Juvenile Court System and surrounding areas in the community. The Academy is a youth oriented mentoring and leadership development program where young men and young ladies, between the ages of 13 – 17, receive empowerment workshops on such topics as: Leadership, Self-Esteem and Identity, Relationships, Basic Life Skills, Social Etiquette and Grooming as well as involvement in pro-social and team building activities. This curriculum is designed to enrich the lives of youth by presenting a wholesome program that will prepare them for future leadership roles within the community and in their schools.
Free admission, but a free will offering/donation will be accepted. All proceeds will go towards the Academy. For more information, please contact Pearline Cole at 770-842-9742 or via email at email@example.com.


text:
Learn what Phone.com can do for your business by signing up today.
Get a brand new virtual number or toll free phone number working in seconds. Or transfer your existing one.
Then get creative and start building your phone system. If you get stuck or need help, just call Apoyo.
Enjoy crystal-clear conversations. That is, unless you've got peanut butter stuck to the roof of your mouth.
Every User Extension comes with its own conference bridge for up to 500 participants. Never second-guess that group call again.
Reliable call recording for your entire account, or selective call recordings, based on number or extension.
Initiate and moderate a group chat over SMS with our mobile app. Your thumbs are more powerful than you think.
Text messages sent to your Phone.com number can be received and displayed in your account inbox. Forwarded messages will display on your cell phone like any regular SMS.
Send, receive and save fax files directly from your Phone.com account. It's simple. And you never have to hear that annoying beee-dooooo-rrrerrk-bzzzz again.
No need to buy a new phone–use the one you have. Use any traditional analog telephone with Phone.com using our Analog Telephone Adapter.
Use your computer as your phone extension with Phone.com Communicator software. Just download, install and you're ready.
Phones purchased directly from Phone.com come pre-configured, ready to work the moment they're plugged into your network.
Any smartphone or mobile phone. Basically, if you can get a dial tone, it'll work with Phone.com.
Reliable phone service down the street, around town or cross country. We got ya covered.
Connect across the pond or around the world. We'll make sure your connection is clear. See our International rates.


text:
RealOG necesitaba un nuevo diseño de logotipo y lanzó un concurso de diseño en 99designs.
Un ganador ha sido elegido entre 84 diseños de 19 diseñadores freelance.
Superion Management
Superion Management is dedicated to being the premier combat sports agency. We are a new company, focused around the athlete and bringing the absolute best service in the industry.
What is unique about Superion Management is that all employees are or have been fighters. Some are still actively competing! Because of this, we understand, first hand, the needs and challenges of our athletes.
Our current website is at http://www.superionmanagement.com.
Three specific target audiences: fighters, sponsors, and promoters.
Fighters – Our main customers. 99% are males ages 18-40. Most have second jobs and are trying hard to make a living with fighting. We get athletes fights, sponsorships, appearances, and discounts.
Sponsors – Secondary customers. They represent a variety of businesses, and most are local. Our sponsors range from clothing and sporting equipment manufacturers to automobile dealerships. Sponsors provide product and services or funds in exchange for advertising.
Promoters – Secondary customers. 99% are male ages 30-50 who handle setting up fights and events. They come to our company for fighters, for either matches or appearances.
We are trying to convey three specific elements with our logo:
1. Integrity – honesty is another lacking element in many MMA productions and companies, we focus on this.
2. Easy-to-work-with – we have systems and policies that make working with us easier than our competition.
3. Professional – many fight outfits lack professionalism, we want this embodied in our logo.
Our wants are relatively simple:
• Style: modern, clean, professional, dynamic logo
• Must be instantly recognizable, logo will be seen on TV on our fighters' apparel for very sporadic moments
• Specific color scheme is open, but no more than three colors
• Version must work when printed in black and white.
• Clearly seen even if it's small - it will be used on shorts, shirts, hats and business cards
• Final format delivery: PDF, JPG, BMP
• Stick to "wants" but feel free to innovate. Demonstrate your creativity.
Our don't wants are also simple:
• Stiffness and Stuffiness - keep it clean and professional, but use creativity to avoid the stiffness of standard investment logos.
• No designs or logos stolen from other sites. Please try to keep your designs original and independent of each other
• Target our specific audiences and age groups
• Confusing logos, should be instantly recognizable and synonymous as MMA sports
Descubre cómo funciona un concurso de diseño u obtén más información sobre nuestros servicios de diseño de logo.


text:
This looks like an obvious question, you when set it to true either through XAML or code, then the Selector's (such as ListBox and ComboBox) selection operation will drive the setting of the current item within CollectionView which presents the data bound source collection, so when you want to synchronize current item with the selected item, you could write something like the following XAML snippet:
<x:Arrayx:Key="data" Type="{x:Type sys:String}">
<sys:String>Paviel Dedved</sys:String>
<sys:String>Andriy Shevchenko</sys:String>
<sys:String>Paolo Maldini</sys:String>
<sys:String>Robert Baggio</sys:String>
<sys:String>Alessandro Del Piero</sys:String>
<StackPanel DataContext="{StaticResource data}">
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" Margin="5" IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True"/>
<ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" Margin="5" IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True"/>
<TextBlock>CurrentItem: <TextBlock Text="{Binding /}"/>
From the above code, the ListBox and ComboBox is data bound to the same source collection, but for each ItemsSource binding, a unique CollectionView is generated, so that both ListBox and ComboBox can make independent selection without affecting each other, this is what most developers expect. So if you want both ListBox and ComboBox to drive the currency, you need to explicitly set the IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem property to true, this is pretty obvious and straightforward, isn't it?
If you think this is an obvious thing to do, then I have another XAMLPad ready example which might confuse you:
<x:Arrayx:Key="data" Type="{x:Type sys:String}">
<sys:String>Paviel Dedved</sys:String>
<sys:String>Andriy Shevchenko</sys:String>
<sys:String>Paolo Maldini</sys:String>
<sys:String>Robert Baggio</sys:String>
<sys:String>Alessandro Del Piero</sys:String>
<CollectionViewSource x:Key="src" Source="{StaticResource data}"/>
<StackPanel DataContext="{StaticResource src}">
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" Margin="5"/>
<ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" Margin="5"/>
<TextBlock>CurrentItem: <TextBlock Text="{Binding /}"/>
If you run above XAML snippet in XAMLPad, you will find that both ListBox and ComBox can drive the currency as if the IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem property is set to true. so what happens?
If you use reflector to example the source code of the Selector, if you will the SetSynchronizationWithCurrentItem() method implementation as follows:
private void SetSynchronizationWithCurrentItem()
bool? isSynchronizedWithCurrentItem = IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem;
bool oldSync = IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItemPrivate;
bool newSync;
if (isSynchronizedWithCurrentItem.HasValue)
// if there's a value, use it
newSync = isSynchronizedWithCurrentItem.Value;
// when the value is null, synchronize if selection mode is Single
// and there's a non-default view.
SelectionMode mode = (SelectionMode)GetValue(ListBox.SelectionModeProperty);
newSync = (mode == SelectionMode.Single) &&
IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItemPrivate = newSync;
if (!oldSync && newSync)
From the bolded line of code, it seems that this is an intentional behaviour, which means that if the SelectionMode of Selector is Single, and the CollectionView data bound to the Selector is not the implicit, default View generated by WPF's data binding engine, Selector will drive the currency. This might not make sense to you, but after the following explanation, I hope it finally makes sense to you.
There are two aspects for this issue, the first is multi selection, and the second is non-default view.
First, it's no brainer that when the Selector is in Multiple SelectionMode, WPF can not take on current synchronization, because there is no such concept of "multi-current items" from the perspective of each ICollectionView implementation(CollectionView for IEnumerable, ListCollectionView for IList and BindingListCollectionView for IBindingList etc), you might think that WPF can choose one item from the selected items as the current item, but it's hard to figure out which one is the best candidate for current item, because this decision usually varies tremendously in different scenarios, and it's nearly impossible for a general purpose framework like WPF to make a good decision for you.
Second, WPF drives currency if you are using the non-default explicit CollectionView, this usually is achieved by declaring the underlying data to be CollectionViewSource, because when you use CollectionViewSource which is a XAML friendly version of CollectionView, WPF assumes that you are mostly likely wanting to enable master/detail binding, and it's obvious that you need the currency synchronization service provided by Selector. So WPF thinks that it's a good default and correct behaviour to implicitly turn on currency synchronization for you.
Knowing that this is the heuristics WPF makes on how you are going to use the data, and it might cause some incorrect behaviour as reported in this WPF MSDN forum thread, so it might worth a blog entry to point this out:)
BTW, for any one who thinks that the {Binding /} syntax is alien to them, you could refer to this Ian Griffith's excellent blog post for explanation.