text:
We are a professional, well established, full range web development, web design and online marketing agency, based near Birmingham, in the West Midlands.
By using fully featured content management systems, ecommerce solutions and online marketing strategies such as Joomla, Drupal, Magento, Campaign Monitor and Google Analytics, we will meet your requirements and the requirements you don't yet know you have.
We can provide interactive, new media websites with features such as pod casting, Flash video, blogs, forums, event management, community and social networking facilities, user login and user profiles, user only content, galleries, email marketing, real time chat, payment systems and shopping carts, data capture, multilingual content, in either a funky or corporate style, colourful or plain, simple or busy.
What puts us above the competition? What makes us a GREAT web development company:
By using our experience and taking a common sense approach, with enough time taken in the planning stage, we can't be beaten on ANY of these.
If you want a brilliant, feature rich website and you want to look better than your competition, PLEASE CONTACT US.
The people who use your site, are the people who you should be listening to when it comes to deciding how your website works and what it looks like. Successfully marketing your website venture means you need to pay attention to how your target audience thinks, what they want and what they like. By using our content management system you can adapt and tailor your content so that is fits your customers , on the fly. We can give you the tools to quickly adapt your site to market trends, latest releases, new products or industry news without the need of any third party.
Learn more about why content management works
Dotcom Development has partnered up with CSP Solar to provide eco-friendly web hosting, powered by solar energy.
Driving customers to your site is of paramount importance. But having a great looking site is only a small part of the bigger picture. We don't just deliver great looking ecommerce websites that work, we can provide design and analysis services that will keep your business ahead of the game. By optimising your website and employing analytic tools we can help you maximise on your investment, attract the maximum amount of customers and most importantly keep them coming back for more.
Learn more about how our ecommerce works
We have been developing websites using the Joomla! Content Management System for over 4 years and we understand how it can meet the requirements of the most demanding clients. The availability of hundreds of quality components to enhance and extend the functionality of your Joomla website means your never too far from adding the features that you want on your website also ensuring a future proof site for the features you may need further down the road. Read more to find out why we feel Joomla! is the content management system that will exceed your expectations...


text:
What's the best way to celebrate bagging Boundary, Nevada's tallest peak? By soaking in pure serenity as you gaze across the valley at that rugged beast. We're talking about none other than Fish Lake Valley Hot Springs, friends.
If this sounds like something you want to do, you're in luck. This slice of heaven is located not far from Tonopah, just off of highway 6. It's a stones throw away from Bureau of Land Management property, but is owned and operated by Esmeralda County and considered to be a public amenity that is available to all. The main source has an impressive flow and pipes into an established concrete pool complete with a stepladder and handrails. If that's not cushy enough for your remote Nevada hot spring getaway, visitors will find a concrete patio and wooden benches as well. While most Nevada hot springs can comfortably hold a few adults, the pool at Fish Lake Valley can accommodate a group as it's 7 x 2 feet and roughly 3 feet deep. Plus, the tub overflows into two warm ponds, making an optimal swimming retreat in summer months.
This beautiful marsh also promises some cool birding and wildlife spotting opportunities. Sure, a lake being named Fish Lake might not be out of the ordinary, but the fish that call Fish Lake Valley home are, in fact special. Yep, keep your eyes peeled for large schools of GOLDFISH scooting around in the warm ponds year round.
Best yet, make your excursion to this remote gem a weekend getaway by bagging Boundary and camping overnight at Fish Lake Valley Hot Springs. Or, plan on camping out there and using Fish Lake Valley as a home base for off-roading to the nearby ghost towns of Silver Peak, Blair and Candelaria.
This one is in the top five of most awesome Nevada hot springs for sure. The temperature here is usually pretty consistent, sitting around 105 degrees in the tub. You can't go wrong with a dip at Fish Lake Valley any time of year, but the area is particularly enjoyable in spring and fall months.
From Tonopah, head north on US Highway 95. This portion of highway coming out of Tonopah is also known as Highway 6. Follow Highway 95/6 for 40.4 miles until you reach the Coaldale junction. Hang a left here, continuing on Highway 6 toward NV-773 South. Travel approximately 6 miles and turn left onto NV-773 South. Once you're on NV-773, travel for 10.5 miles until you reach NV-264 south. Stay on NV-264 South for 5.8 miles. Here, you'll see an old ranch house. Turn left [so you're headed eastbound again] and travel for about 6 more miles until reaching the spring.
Whether you decide to visit a well-known hot spring or attempt to venture to a lesser-known geothermal zone, be sure to follow a few tips to keep yourself and others around you safe.
Always, ALWAYS test the temperature before getting into a natural hot spring. Even well-known springs can drastically change temperatures, so testing the water each time will ensure you don't step into a spring that's too hot. A food thermometer works well for testing.
Point of Interest Go››

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Services on Demand
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 2304-8557
Print version ISSN 0023-270X
Koers (Online) vol.78 n.2 Pretoria Jan. 2013
Organism versus mechanism: Losing our grip on the distinction
Organisme en meganisme: 'n Onderskeid wat verlore gaan
Henk Reitsema
L'Abri Fellowship Foundation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
The distinction between organism and mechanism is often subtle or unclear and yet can prove to be fundamental to our understanding of the world. It has been tempting for many thinkers to seek to 'understand' all of reality through the lens of either the one or the other of these concepts rather than by giving both a place. This article sets out to argue that there is a substantial loss of understanding when either of these metaphors is absolutised to explain all causal processes and patterns in reality. Clarifying the distinction between the two may provide one more tool to grasp what is reductionist in many of the perspectives that have come to dominate public life and science today. This contention is tested on the quest for the design of self-replicating systems (i.e. synthetic organisms) in the nanotech industry. It is common that the concepts of organic functioning and mechanism are used imprecisely and in an overlapping way. This is also true of much scientific debate, especially in the fields of biology, micro-biology and nano-science. This imprecise use signals a reductionist tendency both in the way that the organic is perceived and in terms of the distinctive nature of mechanisms.
Die onderskeid tussen organisme en meganisme is dikwels subtiel of onduidelik, maar nogtans kan hierdie verskil 'n groot invloed op ons verstaan van die wêreld hê. Dit was in die geskiedenis van die filosofie vir baie denkers verleidelik om die totale werklikheid deur die lens van slegs die een of die ander van hierdie metafore te probeer verstaan in plaas daarvan om albei hulle regmatige plek te gee. Hierdie artikel argumenteer dat daar 'n substansiële verlies aan begrip is as 'n mens slegs een van hierdie metafore verabsoluteer in 'n poging om alle oorsaak- en gevolgpatrone in die werklikheid te verklaar. 'n Duideliker onderskeid tussen hierdie twee konsepte kan waarskynlik 'n bydrae lewer om die reduksionistiese elemente in die hedendaagse denkwyses wat die wetenskap en die openbare lewe oorheers, te bepaal. Hierdie benadering word getoets aan 'n analise van die ontwikkelinge in die nanotegnologie waar gepoog word om sintetiese lewe en selfrepliserende sisteme te vervaardig. Dit kom algemeen voor dat die begrippe organisme en meganisme onnoukeurig gebruik word en, tot 'n mate, soms selfs oorvleuelend. Dit geld ook vir 'n groot deel van die huidige wetenskaplike debatte, veral in die biologie, mikrobiologie en nanowetenskap dissiplines. Hierdie onnoukeurige woordgebruik maak dit duidelik dat daar 'n reduksie plaasvind beide in die onderskeid tussen wat as organiese en dit wat as spesifiek meganiese eienskappe beskou word.
The distinction between organism and mechanism is often subtle or unclear and yet can prove to be fundamental to our understanding of the world. It has been tempting for many thinkers to seek to 'understand' all of reality through the lens of either the one or the other of these concepts rather than by giving both a place. This article sets out to argue that there is a substantial loss of understanding when either one of these metaphors is absolutised to explain all causal processes and patterns in reality. Clarifying the distinction between the two may provide one more tool to grasp what is reductionist in many of the perspectives that have come to dominate public life and science today. This contention is tested on the quest for the design of self-replicating systems (i.e. synthetic organisms), a central endeavour in nanotechnology today.
It is common that the concepts of organic functioning and mechanism are used imprecisely and in an overlapping way. This is also true for much scientific debate, especially in the fields of biology, micro-biology and nano-science. This imprecise use signals a reductionist tendency both in the way that the organic is perceived and in terms of the distinctive nature of mechanisms. This reduction results in a number of paradoxes both in science and in society. In biology, for example, the increased scientific understanding of the processes at the nano-scale has resulted in people situating cause in mechanistic causal chains rather than in causes seated in the distinctive realm of the organic (the cell as a centre of operation and top-down (function based) causal processes). At the same time, the more vague vocabulary of emergentism has entered biology as a mechanistic explanatory tool, whilst it provides little or no predictive capacity (Anderson 1972:394),1 paradoxically introducing an almost magical dimension in our understanding of how a strictly mechanistic process works.
Though the choice has been made in this article to take the developments in nanotechnology and microbiology as a primary test case, the organism-mechanism distinction is equally relevant to social contexts. In social organisations, the use of the term 'mechanism' is often applied to things like double bookkeeping to keep people honest and multilayered management.2 These are often used to supplant or replace processes like relationships of trust and sense of honour. Propensities such as these (trust and honour) can reasonably be called organismic in the sense that they are natural, often pre-intentional processes of the human organism which function simultaneously, especially in the realm of interconnectedness at multiple dimensions of scale. Even evolutionary biologists and neuroscientists would argue that altruism and trust have some form of evolutionary origin and therefore are part of the natural organic realm (see Axelrod 2006:130; Dawkins [1976] 1989:11; Trivers 1971:35). The paradox of using such mechanisms to supplant relational processes is that the cost of overheads can increase whereas the goal was to safeguard appropriate use of funds. It would seem that finding a legitimate place for both dynamics would be a better way to go.
Mechanismic versus organismic worldview
The terminology attempting to indicate an overarching worldview that is defined either by the organism metaphor or by the mechanism metaphor is not uniform. Organistic, organismic and organicism (and the commensurate forms of the term 'mechanism') have all been employed to this end (Venter 1997:41-60). Part of the difficulty with this terminology is that the traditional use of the '-ism' ending to connote extreme or universalised perspective, is already part of the core terminology in this case, but is here simply referring to functioning wholes. This renders the terms 'organistic' and 'mechanistic' ambiguous, either referring to organlike or machinelike or to a more worldviewish usage. From here on, I will use the terms 'organismic' and 'mechanismic' to refer to the overarching worldview and the terms 'organistic' and 'mechanistic' to connote an absolutised or one-sided use of either metaphor in the more restricted context of a specific aspect or case of reality.
The tendency to take the biology-based term 'organism' and apply it to inorganic systems, perpetually moving wholes or groups rather than individuals, has a long history. Many ancient worldviews included some form of organismic thinking, as do more recent variants of pantheistic and New Age philosophies. In these philosophies the movement of people and animals (i.e. organisms) is taken as a model and explanation of the movement of all other moving things, for example, the celestial bodies. We are then seen to be living inside a huge living entity that requires harmony in order to function. As Venter (1992:189-224) has emphasised, these pictures of how things work provide more than just explanations of the movement of celestial bodies; they also imply evaluations of things in the universe. If this system of heavenly bodies is an eternal living entity that has a direct influence on my life, they must somehow be omnipotent or divine. So we have to live in a way that pleases these powerful influences. When applied to group wholes, this view quickly breeds an absolutist view of the dynamics of the group, whatever scale size one is focusing on. An example can be found in the organismic social perspective of the likes of Mussolini (1938:18). Venter (1992:189-200) argues that the resurfacing tendency in the 20th century to have an organismic perspective (as in the New Age movement), has its roots in the new physics that has paradoxically opened the way to ancient pantheistic mysticism.
The inherent category confusion in organismic thinking which declares that all is organism, ends up reducing reality in a number of ways. For one it does not sufficiently allow for causal relationships at other levels of explanation. Dooyeweerd's (2002:94, 241) suite of aspects of reality and his analysis of act structures would be a relevant reminder in this regard, situating laws of cause and effect in many layers from the numeric, spatial and kinematic up through the higher levels of behaviour caused by social processes etc. It also leads to a loss of both truly external (to the cosmos) influences and to a loss of situated or intention based causes inside the whole.
When machines working on wind-, water- and fire-based steam energy started to become more complex and seemingly self-perpetuated, a new model was found with which to represent the universe, and so the mechanismic worldview was born. If reality is a big machine, then the planets are not all defining or supreme and we can, once we understand their mechanics, employ their forces and perhaps even control them. More importantly, the machine-based perception of ourselves implies a similar potential for control, once the mechanics are understood, but lacks precisely a space for an acting self. This ends up undressing our existence, so that there is no space for an acting self and the real solutions are chemical and not intentional.
It is with the body-mind dualism of the enlightenment philosopher René Descartes that the machine metaphor could start to be applied as a key to understanding things that had formerly been defined by their being an organism or having an organism-like dynamic. This line of understanding was strengthened by Thomas Hobbes's description of humans and society as a machine (Hobbes 1962:19, 55) and has subsequently been applied in the industrial revolution when people were organised in a machine-like fashion to enhance the tempo of production. This spurned a variety of mechanismic models of understanding economic processes and all other social interactions. Darwin was strongly influenced by this mechanismic tradition in economics. He especially linked the conflict or competition motive with discourse from the advances in technology as well as from the cultural practices of selection (farmers and pigeon breeders). All these elements contributed to the central concept of his theory: the metaphor of 'naturalselection' (Venter 1996:209).
How the machine metaphor came to be dominant even in biology
Descartes had taken the position that we need to incorporate a method of extreme scepticism to achieve certainty. Mathematics was the only science that was seen as successful in conquering scepticism (Strauss 1953:171). It was the kind of fundamental knowledge that would give humans power. What was happening here was that a fundamental shift was taking place in the natural law (right) idea as it had been understood in its development from Plato and Aristotle through the Middle Ages. This natural law idea was also influenced by Galileo in his formulation of the law of inertia, where movement was viewed as the natural state of things (Strauss 1953:10). Hobbes, who took over Descartes's conviction that fundamental scepticism was necessary, extended this idea to humans and society: 'for seeing life is but a motion of limbs … for what is the heart but a spring; and the nerves, but so many strings, and the joints, but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole' (Hobbes 1962:19, 55). This is a clear attempt at trying to understand the organic in mechanistic terms. Because of the basic attitude of scepticism, knowledge was not seen as concerned with ends (no teleology) any more. This loss of appreciation of goal- or purpose-based functioning resulted in a diminished interest in the goals that biological functions are driven by and therefore a preference for the mechanistic view arose (Strauss 1953:171). For modernity, natural law had become the sealed-off totality of nature, unchanging. This is in sharp contrast with natural law as Aquinas (1948) had still perceived it:
To the natural law pertains everything to which a man is inclined according to his nature. Now different men are inclined to different things; ... Therefore there is not one natural law. (q. 94 a. 4)
Aquinas certainly considered many things universal amongst humanity and therefore saw natural law as a fine basis for many conclusions as to what is true, though he did not see it as an impersonal structure, but as that which joined particular instances of justice to the Divine. The shift away from this conviction that was started with Descartes led to a scientific approach that presupposed that all laws describing the natural order could be distilled into mathematical formulas, building from the laws of interaction for the smallest parts upwards.
The result is a reduction to the model of mechanism or machine for all interactions of matter, not allowing for new constituents to enter at the organic level - or any other level, for that matter. This also does not allow for a causality that is situated in these higher layers. This mechanistic restriction has led to false expectations and a sterile approach within those disciplines that are defining the landscape for much of the research and engineering which is currently taking place also at the nanoscale. The nanoscale is where biology and physics meet and so this development has led to a mechanisation of the understanding of cause-and-effect relationships even in biology - the discipline that should have been the science of organic functioning par excellence.
The difference between biological 'structures' and human creations
One of the people who have spent time pondering the differences between things made by humans and that which we find in the organic realm as biology observes it is Robert Rosen. Rosen concludes the first chapter of his book Life itself with the remark: 'So it happens that the wonderful edifice of physical science, so articulate elsewhere, stands today utterly mute on the fundamental question: What is life?' (Rosen 1991:12). What he subsequently argues in his book is that: 'the muteness of physics [with regard to the question: what is life?] arises from its fundamental inapplicability to biology' (Rosen 1991:13). In his analysis, this inapplicability to biology has everything to do with the tendency of physics to restrict itself to mechanism, computability and that which is simulable. He formulates himself as follows:
As we have seen, a contemporary physicist will feel very much at home in the world of mechanisms. We have quite deliberately created this world without making any physical hypotheses, beyond our requiring the simulability of every model. We have thus put ourselves in a position to do a great deal of physics, without having had to know any physics. That fact alone should indicate just how special the concept of mechanism really is. It is my contention that contemporary physics has actually locked itself into this world; this has of course enabled it to say much about the (very special) systems in that world, and nothing at all about what is outside. Indeed, the claim that there is nothing outside (i.e., that every natural system is a mechanism) is the sole support of contemporary physics' claim to universality. (Rosen 1991:212-213)
What Rosen articulates here is that the trend to simulate organic function with computational models indicates an underlying assumption that organism is nothing more than complex mechanism.
We are organisms but we make mechanisms
The products of human design would seem to be more mechanical than organic. This comes because abstraction and reduction are tools that we use to grasp or conceptualise things in the concrete world3 (Glas 2002:149). Though we are organisms for whom it is true that in some way everything is connected to everything (organism, species, population, environment, biosphere, etc.), the complexity of this interconnectedness is too great for us to exhaustively map in our minds. So, though our functioning at the level of naive experience is wonderfully integrated, our attempts to design and make things are more detached from this layered integration, because we employ abstraction and reduction. By definition, therefore, what we make tends in the direction of the more limited machine-like dynamics of limited cause-and-effect patterns. Machines are typically not fully integrated with their environment, therefore they disturb rather than partake in the balance4 of things in the organic realm.
This dimension of human design holds true except for in those contexts where the regulating interaction of organisms is steering that process of design, such as in the structure of human organisations. Even here, though, it could be argued that we tend to err in the direction of mechanistic resolutions to organic problems.5 This is still true of the management-driven models of organisation of our day, including those that believe in employing what are considered to be the emergent properties in such systems. Given the mechanistic restrictions of physics and human engineering, if there are material systems that are not mechanisms, all that contemporary physics can do is to tell us what properties they cannot have. And as Rosen (1991) puts it:
what must be absent seems devastating. For instance, such a system cannot have a state set, built up synthetically from the states of minimal models and fixed once and for all. If there is no state set, there is certainly no recursion, and hence, no dynamics in the ordinary sense of the term. There is accordingly no largest model of such a system. And the categories of causation in it cannot be segregated into discrete, fixed parts, because fractionability itself fails. (p. 242)
This last remark about the absence of fractionability (or the lack of accumulation of discrete packages in design) is really a core issue in the difference between human engineering and the design embodied in organic life.
What it means is that the degree of complexity of biological design is typically far greater than a product of human engineering with the same number of parts because of the more integrated nature of that design, that is, there are more established relationships and connections over more scales of size without partition into separable packages (everything is more authentically connected with everything else6). Complexity is not the only characteristic of life, though; it is not even its defining characteristic. Rosen would say 'complexity7 is not life itself though it is the habitat of life' (Rosen 1991:280). More is needed to distinguish what is alive from what is complex; given the complexity of dead organisms this should be clear. Biology, amongst other things, is relational in the sense that the organisation is prioritised over the physics:8
Organization in its turn inherently involves functions and their interrelations; the abandonment of fractionability, however, means there is no 1 to 1 relationship between such relational, functional organizations and the structures which realize them. These are the basic differences between organisms and mechanisms or machines. (Rosen 1991:280)
Rosen arguably epitomises the reductionist approach to life, as: 'throw away the organization and keep the underlying matter' (Rosen 1991:126, 127). The relational alternative to this, he would say, is the exact opposite, namely: 'when studying an organized material system, throw away the matter and keep the underlying organization.'
The concepts 'organism' and 'organisation' are not only linked by chance similarity of letters. Their etymological linkage gives witness to an age-old insight that the two belong together. 'Organisation' in our context means purpose-directed structure (having teleology) or functionally specific structuring. Organisms are characterised, amongst other things, by the fact that their parts are organised in a functionally specific way. Not only is this organisation visible when one looks for it but the functional or relational aspect seems to be primary, that is, biological systems frequently achieve the same goal by different means, whether it be the realising of pain, being in a certain state of mind or conquering a bacterial or viral intrusion. The embodied organisation would seem to be the organisation of functions which are then realised in material organisation - the direction of causation being both top-down and bottom-up, rather than simply bottom-up. What is happening is that the top-down (function-oriented) causal processes are employing the bottom-up physico-chemical processes to achieve their goal. The immunological response would be a case in point: it displays a lot of redundancy characterised not by a similarity of mechanism but by a similarity of goal or function. The essence of biological design seems to be found in the relationships of a vast variety of functionalities. These functionalities are frequently realisable by various physical means. Whilst chaos may be a form of structure, even having its own kind of regularity and computability, it is not organisation for lack of this goal-oriented dimension (see Figure 1).
What Rosen contends is that biological organisms - in contrast to mechanisms9 and machines - contain almost everything about their functional organisation within themselves (Rosen 1991:244). This is in line with Heusinkveld and Jochemsen's (2006:5) assertion that cells have an inwardness. As a result, biological organisms can answer 'why?' questions about components of their functional organisation in terms of efficient cause from within this organisation (Gwinn 2007a:1). Rosen coined the phrase 'closed to efficient causation' (Rosen 1991:244) to express this feature of organisms which have an internal loop of causation that closes out external domino effects in the mechanistic sense. What this means is that there is top-down causation within an organism which provides the reason for why some of the bottom-up chemical processes fulfil the function that they do. This is a concept that has tremendous implications for biology, physics and science in general. It means that to describe the processes inside organisms, one has to have models (such as the metabolism-repair system model (see Figure 1) (Louie 2005:423-436), which include impredictive loops of causation. These are therefore models that are non-computable, that is, they cannot be turned into algorithms for computational processing.
This flies in the face of the widely held conviction that Turing machines (computation-based machines that define the limits of mechanical computation) are the ticket to developing computation-based models of life and that all complexity in the natural order is fractionable. The challenge for physics is therefore to create a formalism that is outside the realm of simulable recursive functions and therefore is not state-based, and is not fully computable, in the Turing sense. As Gwinn (2007b:2) points out, there sometimes exists a degree of confusion concerning what a Turing machine is or is not capable of computing. This uncertainty stems from the use of phrases such as 'more powerful' when referring to certain kinds of computing device, which seem to imply a larger scope of computability but in reality refer only to speed or efficiency of computation. Also, devices such as Cray computers, cellular automata, neural nets and quantum computers are unable to compute anything that is outside the (theoretical) scope of a Turing machine. Even adding 'stochastic' devices, multiple read or write heads, and so forth, to a Turing machine does not allow the enhanced machine to compute anything beyond what was already considered computable (Gwinn 2007b:2). Turing computability covers only the realm of purely rote or algorithmic processes. Such processes are completely syntactic, since they are restricted to symbol manipulation. In the realm of mathematical systems, such systems that do not include semantic elements and are entirely describable by rote processes are labelled formalisable. It is this feature of formalisability that makes state-based modelling possible. State-based descriptions are what all of physics rests on (including quantum mechanics), yet they are unable to describe systems that possess such impredictive loops of causation (Louie 2006:2). Gwinn (2007b) summarises Rosen's conclusion as follows:
The result is that the limits of description imposed by the approaches of computational modelling and by state-based physics are entirely artefactual (non-living), and do not represent fundamental limits of the material world. With regard to biology, those approaches are incapable of answering fundamental questions about organisms, such as 'what is life?', because they are unable to represent the relevant features of the material systems we call "organisms" within their formalisms. (p. 2)
It is fair to note that Rosen's conclusion is not that artificial life is impossible. It is, rather, that life is not computable: however one models life, whether natural or artificial, one cannot succeed by computation alone, would be his position. Ultimately he is saying that life is not definable by an algorithm, no matter how complex the algorithm is (Louie 2005:3). This is a conclusion that in fact has some practical verification from computer science. Attempts to implement a hierarchical closed loop led to deadlock, which is expressly forbidden in systems programming (Silberschatz & Galvin 1998).
Synthesised life?
The most full-blown attempts to synthesise life and reduce organic process to the computable can be found in the recent work of the Craig Venter Institute and the Biophysics and Bioengineering departments of Stanford University. An article entitled: 'A Whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype' (Karr et al. 2012:389-401) clearly exudes the conviction that life can be fully simulated with computer models.
The article starts with the observation that: '[u]nderstanding how complex phenotypes arise from individual molecules and their interactions is a primary challenge in biology that computational approaches are poised to tackle' (Karr et al. 2012:389). Two broadly heralded assumptions are evident in this starting point. The first is that ultimately the computational reduction of organic life is possible, even if there is still a lot of refining to do. The second is that the phenotype (the working whole) is somehow produced by its molecular parts, rather than that the integrated whole steers its reproduction as a kind of control centre. Not only is the control situated in the parts rather than the whole, but there is a further reduction specifically to the genome (DNA molecule) as the steering or controlling entity, even though the computational model at hand has included a lot of effort to model the perceived products of genome function. One sees this reduction of life to the genome in the following quotation: 'Moreover, these findings, in combination with the recent de novo synthesis of the M. genitalium chromosome and successful genome transplantation of Mycoplasma genomes to produce a synthetic cell (Gibson et al. 2008, 2010; Lartigue et al. 2007, 2009), raise the exciting possibility of using whole-cell models to enable computer-aided rational design of novel microorganisms' (Karr et al. 2012:399). The quick jump from a synthesised DNA molecule (which is not designed but copied from biological design) to therefore having created a synthesised cell is clearly a blind spot that has its roots in the reduction of life to the genotype. It has to be stressed that the genome does not replicate itself; in fact, it does nearly nothing by itself. It is rather replicated by the cell as a working whole.
The tendency to look at the represented code as the ultimate driver loose from the rest of the cell is even more painfully clear when one sees how the weight discrepancy between the DNA and the total Mycoplasma chromosome is perceived:
Most of these parameters were implemented as originally reported. However, several other parameters were carefully reconciled; for example, the experimentally measured DNA content per cell (Morowitz et al., 1962; Morowitz, 1992) represents less than one-third of the calculated mass of the Mycoplasma chromosome. Data S1 details how we resolved this and several similar discrepancies among the experimentally observed parameters. (Karr et al. 2012:391)
At the one point in the article where the authors give evidence of bumping into another source of steering than simply the genome, the vocabulary of emergence is evoked: 'The whole-cell model therefore presents a hypothesis of an emergent control of cell-cycle duration that is independent of genetic regulation' (Karr et al. 2012:393). The implication of this is that the regulation of timing is produced by bottom-up complex interactions rather than that the embodied pattern or organisation situated in the whole is steering in any way. Seeing the way that the vocabulary of emergence is employed here, one can conclude that the reduction to mechanistic cause and effect is accompanied by a physicalist or even a simply materialist ontology.
A final observation about the mechanismic underpinnings of this research into cell function is the assumption that the cell and the genome are fundamentally fractionable. In their own words:
Our approach to developing an integrative whole-cell model was to divide the total functionality of the cell into modules, model each independently of the others, and integrate these sub models together. (Karr et al. 2012:389)
In terms of both the independence of the various functions in the cell and the perceived genetic units that govern these functions, there is a very real reduction going on when it becomes clear that this computational model is not just a tool for learning (which it has proven to be useful for), but is also seen as a preliminary blueprint for the design of novel organisms. The genome is neither truly divided into discrete packages nor are the parts of the cell functioning independently.
Computability is not the only difference between things made by humans and natural organisms, though. There are more reasons to tread carefully in the realm of asserting the human capacity to design organismic or life-like things. The fundamental differences between human design and the designs embodied in biology are numerous:
1. The unicity (which is not superficial) of each thing that is replicated.
2. The law of the loss of information (if we create a machine to make pans, the machine will always require more information to describe it than the pans it makes). Biological design does not suffer from this loss.
3. We remain the operators and directors of the things we make; biology produces systems with inwardness, self-governed operation and adaptation.
4. Integration and wholeness (cohesion) - we make systems that are a clear product of the specialisation of attention: one thing made up of many parts. Biology, on the other hand, makes everything, starting from a single cell. (We interact with DNA as though one piece of DNA deals with one function. Biology, though, proves to employ endless feedback loops to use and re-use parts of its genetic code, which in the end results in everything being connected to everything in such a way that real specialisation in the analysis of the genome leads to a loss of understanding and not a gain.)
5. Biology uses redundancy and is flexible in the means of achieving a function (one function can fill in for another) and self-repair (healing) - the mechanical systems we make do not repair themselves, they need to be repaired. Take note that the relevant comparison is not between what a computer does with software or data, but with what those systems do with matter which we have programmed, that is, a car or the computer itself (not just the code or the programming. This is a similar kind of reduction of reality as the reduction of traits to DNA).
6. Biology gathers its own raw materials and processes, and re-uses or jettisons its own waste products.
7. Diversity seems to be a crucial feature of the functioning of biological (organic) systems, together forming a greater system (e.g. atmosphere), which allows for stability and life. This increases the complexity in a way that is not scale thin.10 Human creations tend to be made in isolation, for example, more mono-dimensional, thus restricting themselves to the realm of mechanism.
These differences have been a reason for some people in microbiology and the nanotech sector to take a more careful position than the line of the Craig Venter Institute or that of Drexler (1986), set out in his 'Engines of Creation'. As Harper puts it with reference to the ethics of the human capacity to design organismic things: 'For any threat from the nano world to become a danger, it would have to include far more intelligence and flexibility than we can possibly design into it' (Harper 2003:4). As he sees it:
Nature has the ability to design highly energy efficient systems that operate precisely and without waste, fix only that which needs fixing, do only that which needs doing, and no more. We do not although one day our understanding of nanoscale phenomena may allow us to replicate at least part of what nature accomplishes. (Harper 2003:4)
The lack of a clear understanding and distinction between the mechanistic nature of our creations versus the organic integration of the things we have not designed leads to an unwarranted optimism about our ability to design in the realm of the biological. Though we are organisms, what we make is more machine-like and less organism-like than we would like to admit - especially when self-replicating systems look like such an enticing possibility.
Reduction and synthetic life
Few human endeavours have met with as much 'opposition' from the natural order as the attempts to design phenotype self-replicating systems. Yet much of the recent rhetoric of the nanotech community has taken it for granted that this goal is achievable by humans because the phenomenon occurs in the natural world. These two things do not naturally flow from one another, though. The potential thought mistake is that because organisms are expressed in matter, all they are is matter. Even the attempt to employ emergent behaviour as a way of circumventing our design shortcomings is an extension of the reductionistic11 view that all that organisms are made of is matter. In this view, the primary barrier to being able to make organism-like things is the limit on our capacity to manipulate all the parts of matter, which with nanotech indeed comes closer. Features such as the capacity of organisms to maintain identity whilst moving through various substrates of matter, even replacing every part of the whole, should warn against such reductions. This has led to a consistent trend in the efforts of nanotechnology to invest in the achieving of self-replication (which is akin to life) and for the ethics community to make that its primary focus for evaluating the activities of nanotech. This still holds true, as evidenced by the following quotation from Turney and Ewaschuk's (2006) article on 'Self-replication and self-assembly for manufacturing':
It has been argued that a central objective of nanotechnology is to make products inexpensively, and that self-replication is an effective approach to very low-cost manufacturing. The research presented here is intended to be a step towards this vision. (p. 411)
The qualitative and quantitative difference between the kind of design that humans produce and the kind of designs which are expressed in biological organisms should caution us to take seriously the option that we have design limitations which may fundamentally stand in the way of achieving these goals. There is evidence of more raw material than just matter and energy. The immaterial constituents of life and intelligence may form a more formidable barrier to overcome than simply achieving the capacity to manipulate all that there is to matter (though even this may be a lot more difficult than many of us are suggesting, given the uncertain nature of the material constituents). One of the reasons that the immaterial constituents of biological systems (organisms) have largely been ignored is the predominantly Cartesian model of reality with its machine analogy, which has shaped the landscape for most of what has been called science in the modern era.
Even in the journal Artificial Life, which is devoted to everything that is involved in 'our rapidly increasing technological ability to synthesize life-like behaviours from scratch in computers, machines, molecules, and other alternative media', one author has had to acknowledge that the present state of affairs is that '[e]lectronic systems, no matter how clever and intelligent they are, cannot yet demonstrate the reliability that biological systems can' (Zhang, Dragffy & Pipe 2006:313).>
With regard to all the computer- and electronics-based attempts at simulating life, it needs to be observed that, given the lack of computability of real life, the fabrication of something (e.g. an organism) is a vastly different matter than the simulation of its behaviours. Louie argues that 'the pursuit of the latter represents the ancient tradition that used to be called bio mimesis, the imitation of life' (Louie 2006:6). The idea that underlies the attempts to achieve life through simulation models is:
that by serially endowing a machine with more and more of the simulacra of life, we would cross a threshold beyond which the machine would become an organism. The same reasoning is embodied in the artificial intelligence of today, and it is articulated in Turing's Test. This activity is a sophisticated kind of curve-fitting, akin to the assertion that since a given curve can be approximated by a polynomial, it must be a polynomial. (Louie 2006:6)
Though the distinctive nature of a mechanism is hard to capture, it would seem that the core meaning load of the concept 'mechanism' is to be found in the kind of causality which is functioning at the physical level - that Dooyeweerd (2002:94) situates in the four pre-biotic aspects of reality: quantitative, spatial, kinematic and physical. Here the bottom-up causality is definitive. The relatively limited and linear nature of the complexity of these processes seems to mirror our own limited ability to model and design things. The more layered kind of steering that organic causal processes employ to limit all possible physico-chemical outcomes to a specific set that is functional, would seem more interconnected than our own making.
One of the paradoxes of our time is that both organismic and mechanismic worldviews are prevalent, both appealing to science in their own way. The mechanismic account of causal processes in reality seems more prevalent, though, and defines the way in which we currently invest in research. The risk that absolutising either of these accounts of causal processes holds is that one gets caught in a reductionism that leads to a loss of understanding. The limitations of the various attempts to synthesise life on the basis of mechanistic computational models, computing from the bottom up and starting with the laws for interaction at the smallest level, should signal the very real possibility that there is more raw material to reality than is being captured in the computational, mechanistic approach. An alternative perspective that allows for top-down causal processes such as the organic, which employ the bottom-up physical-chemical processes, would seem more likely to avoid the pitfalls of reductionism. Causal processes may be situated in multiple layers of reality.
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no financial or personal relationship(s) which may inappropriately influence him in writing this article.
Anderson, P.W., 1972, 'More is different', Science 177(4047), 393-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.177.4047.393, PMid:17796623 [ Links ]
Aquinas, T., 1948, Summa Theologica II, Christian Classics, Grand Rapids. [ Links ]
Axelrod, R., 2006, The evolution of cooperation, rev. edn., Perseus Books Group, New York. [ Links ]
Chu, D. & Ho, W.K., 2006, 'A category theoretical argument against the possibility of artificial life: Robert Rosen's central proof revisited', Artificial Life 12(1), 117-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/106454606775186392, PMid:16393453 [ Links ]
Dawkins, R., [1976] 1989, The selfish gene, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dooyeweerd, H., 2002, Encyclopedia of the science of law: Introduction, vol. 1, The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston/New York. [ Links ]
Drexler, K.E., 1986, Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology, Anchor Books Doubleday, New York. [ Links ]
Gibson, D.G., Benders, G.A., Andrews-Pfannkoch, C., Denisova, E.A., Baden-Tillson, H., Zaveri, J. et al., 2008, 'Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome', Science 319, 1215-1220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1151721, PMid:18218864 [ Links ]
Gibson, D.G., Glass, J.I., Lartigue, C., Noskov, V.N., Chuang, R.Y., Algire, M.A. et al., 2010, 'Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome', Science 329, 52-56. [ Links ]
Glas, G., 2002, 'Churchland, Kandel and Dooyeweerd on the reducibility of mind states', Philosophia Reformata 67, 148-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1190719, PMid:20488990 [ Links ]
Gwinn, T., 2007a, 'Closed to efficient causation', in Panmere, viewed 31 January 2013, from http://www.panmere.com/?p=22 [ Links ]
Gwinn, T., 2007b, 'Effective processes, computation, and complexity', in Panmere, viewed 31 January 2013, from http://www.panmere.com/?p=19 [ Links ]
Harper, T., 2003, 'What is nanotechnology?', Nanotechnology 14(1), 4. [ Links ]
Heusinkveld, B.J. & Jochemsen H., 2006, 'Homo excelsior!: Normatieve grenzen bij de maakbaarheid van het menselijk lichaam' [Normative limits to the malleability of the human body], Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidszorg en Ethiek 16(1), 2-6. [ Links ]
Hobbes, T., 1962, Leviathan: Or the matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York. [ Links ]
Karr, J.R., Sanghvi, J.C., Macklin, D.N., Gutschow, M.V., Jacobs, J.M., Bolival, B. et al., 2012, 'A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype', Cell 150(2), 389-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044, PMid:22817898 [ Links ]
Lartigue, C., Glass, J.I., Alperovich, N., Pieper, R., Parmar, P.P., Hutchison, C.A. III, et al., 2007, 'Genome transplantation in bacteria: Changing one species to another', Science 317, 632-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1144622, PMid:17600181 [ Links ]
Lartigue, C., Vashee, S., Algire, M.A., Chuang, R.Y., Benders, G.A., Ma, L. et al., 2009, 'Creating bacterial strains from genomes that have been cloned and engineered in yeast', Science 325, 1693-1696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1173759, PMid:19696314 [ Links ]
Louie, A.H., 2005, 'Any material realization of the (M,R)-systems must have non-computable models', Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 4(4), 423-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219635205000926, PMid:16385638 [ Links ]
Louie, A.H., 2006, 'A living system must have noncomputable models', in Panemere, viewed 31 January 2013, from http://www.panmere.com/rosen/Louie_noncomp_pre_rev.pdf [ Links ]
Mussolini, B., 1938, The doctrine of fascism, Ardita, Rome. [ Links ]
Rosen, R., 1991, Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life, Columbia University Press, New York. [ Links ]
Rosen, R., 1998, Essays on life itself, Columbia University Press, New York. [ Links ]
Rashevsky, N., 1960, Mathematical biophysics, vol.2, 3rd edn., Dover Publications, New York. [ Links ]
Salk, J., 1983, Anatomy of reality: Merging of intuition and reason, Convergence series, Columbia University, New York. [ Links ]
Shostak, S., 1998, Death of life: The legacy of molecular biology, Macmillan Press Ltd, London. [ Links ]
Silberschatz, A. & Galvin, P.B., 1998, Operating system concepts, 5th edn., Addison-Wesley, Reading. [ Links ]
Strauss, L., 1953, Natural right and history, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [ Links ]
Trivers, R.L., 1971, 'The evolution of reciprocal altruism', Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/406755 [ Links ]
Turney, P.D. & Ewaschuk, R., 2006, 'Self-replication and self-assembly for manufacturing', Artificial Life, Summer, 12(3), 411-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/artl.2006.12.3.411, PMid:16859447 [ Links ]
Venter, J.J. 1992, 'From "machine-world" to "God-world" - world pictures and world views', Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 57(2), 189-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/koers.v57i2.783 [ Links ]
Venter, J.J., 1996, 'Mechanistic individualism versus organismic totalitarianism', Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 23(1), 175-200. [ Links ]
Venter, J.J., 1997, 'Ultimate reality and meaning', Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 20(1), 41-60. [ Links ]
Weinberg, S., 2001, Facing up: Science and its cultural adversaries, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. [ Links ]
Zhang X., Dragffy, G. & Pipe, A.G., 2006, 'Embryonics: A path to artificial life?', Artificial Life 12(3), 313-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/artl.2006.12.3.313, PMid:16859443 [ Links ]
Henk Reitsema
Burg Verbrughweg 40, 4024HR, Eck en Wiel, The Netherlands
Received: 06 Feb. 2013
Accepted: 29 Aug. 2013
Published: 28 Nov. 2013
1. 'The ability to reduce everything to simple fundamental laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the universe. In fact, the more the elementary particle physicists tell us about the nature of the fundamental laws, the less relevance they seem to have to the very real problems of the rest of science, much less society' (Anderson 1972:394).
2. It is a fact that these mechanisms are a product of intention and therefore limited to the number of causal layers and interactions that we can neurally realise at any given moment, which distinguishes them from the kind of cause-and-effect patterns that belong with organistic interactions, which are not limited in the same way.
3. The term 'abstraction' refers to the cognitive process of isolating and scrutinising a particular aspect (or aspects) of an object under investigation.
4. 'If all insects on earth disappeared, within 50 years all life on Earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the Earth, within 50 years all forms of life would flourish' (Salk 1983). The implication here is that humans are less in balance with their environment than other organisms because they can employ instrumental reason to design and shape things (mechanisms) that are less well integrated with their environment.
5. Hobbes is of the opinion that the state is an artificial construction (not an organism). It depends on agreement, contract, institution and other manifestations of human decision: 'Man, he held, was a natural machine as distinct from Leviathan, which was an artificial one' (Peters, cited in Hobbes 1962:13).
6. The diversity expressed at the micro level is a reflection of and interrelated with the diversity at the macro level, that is, the one is intrinsically dependent on the other. The elliptical course of the Earth around the sun linked to the solar system's positioning in the rest of the cosmos, and the off-centre angle of the Earth's rotation around its own axis together with the elliptical course provides for the seasons, the varying gravitational pull provided by the moon and the other planets et cetera. This kind of interrelation is also found between the big parts of an individual organism (the organs) and the structures at the micro/nano-level.
7. Rosen (1998:292) chooses to try to redefine complexity in such a way that it is reserved for those systems which are not susceptible to fractionability or other reductionistic mathematical tools (systems having at least one non-simulable model). He writes: 'This is essentially what I have called complexity; a system (mathematical or physical) is complex to the extent that it does not let itself be exhausted within a given set of (subjective) limitations.'
8. Rashevsky (1960) elaborates on this understanding of biology.
9. Chu and Ho (2006:117-134) attempted a rebuttal of Rosen's argument but misrepresented his definition of 'mechanism', which makes their attempt unsuccessful.
10. Shostak (1998:190): '[T]he biosphere of the earth is … a cybernetic system possessing the properties of self regulation. A cybernetic system "possesses stability for blocking external and internal disturbances when it has sufficient internal diversity". Diversity on earth is provided in part by such things as its rotation around the sun, and around its own axis (creating latitudinal and seasonal change), and by the range of elevation and depth of the surface. But the main diversity of the earth's biosphere is created by living organisms. This internal diversity of the biosphere created by life: "provides a definite guarantee for the preservation of life on our planet".'
11. Weinberg (2001:115) is a well-known advocate of reductionist explanation. Whilst he believes that phenomena such as life and mind come about through emergence, he asserts that '[t]he rules they obey are not independent truths, but follow from scientific principles at a deeper level'. What he means by 'deeper' in this context is at the lower level of the constituent physical parts.


text:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hmm this sounds interesting. I Volunteer to be the Male. Also I'm a great choice for SST info. See I work for Mongoose Publishing, the Company that actually got the liscence to make a SST RPG. I have every book for it because I was charged with running it at GENCON one year. Eachj book has great info potential so if you need anything let me know.
That would be great. Because I have nothing on the starship troopers. Was undecided if to go with a system or not. So had left it ambiguous as to whether system or not. Gencon, Ususally my time is split between the living systems of greyhawk in the past and of course larps at night.
Sounds interesting, but since you seem to have quite a bit of struggle going on, system seems almost required.Anyhow, the male slot seems taken. What exactly do you expect of the creature players? Sounds like the story is centered around the humans, not?
what would you like to know? I have my books within Arms reach.
Yes, not sure on how creation is. Doe it allow for such builds as the bugs and the second generation type I am envisioning.
Your idea sounds very interesting, I think I would be interested in such for playing one of the bugs!I am a fan of playing out tentacle characters.Send me a PM and we can talk more
Well The creation system is D20. D20 is complcated for creating stuff in. but it could be done. I would say though it would be safer to use what I have for setting info.
I'd be interested in being one of the women. I do have a few questions though. How akien are you expecting the half breeds to be? How long will it take them to develop (hours? days? weeks? months?) It might be fun to have different kinds of bugs tat produce different kinds of reactions when they mate... like some are live births, some are eggs, maybe some chane the mother to have her be able to survive the birth.... just ideas though,
I am interested play reproducer tentacled bug/second generation half-breed.
I'll do bugs. Very good at critter 'm. All I know about Starship Troopers are the movies tho`.
I'd be interested in this as a female startrooper or maybe a scientist or something? :)
Any more roles need to be filled? :)
I might have been interested in this if it wasn't EX. Does it really have to be EX?
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 27 queries.


text:
Does the Electricity You Use Demolish Mountains?
Mountaintop removal mining in West Virginia.
Photo by Daniel Shea via Flickr
A new Web-based tool allows U.S. residents to learn how their local electricity consumption may be linked to the destruction of landscapes in the Appalachia region of the eastern United States. With "My Connection," a feature from North Carolina-based Appalachian Voices, users can enter their ZIP codes and use Google Earth to view the decimated mountains from which their power provider obtains coal. "When you can show people they have a direct connection to it, it makes it that much more relevant to their day-to-day life," Mary Anne Hitt, the executive director of Appalachian Voices, told the Wall Street Journal.
The online tool uses mapping and aerial imagery to allow users to do a "fly over" of power production and coal mining locations around the country. It also helps Appalachian Voices campaign director Lenny Kohm answer the frequently asked question: "what's [mountaintop removal mining] got to do with me?" The relatively new form of strip mining, which involves blowing up all or part of a mountain to reach the coal seams below, is particularly harmful to the environment, miners, and local communities, the group says.
With the new tool, electricity users from as far away as California can be linked to mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia. "When you look at a light switch on the wall, you think of it as a light switch, but this gives you a chance to look behind it," says Kohm. "Everyone who uses electricity is complicit in blowing up mountains."
The feedback Appalachian Voices has received on the new Web feature has been largely positive, according to Kohm. Many people's response is, "I never realized I had anything to do with this," he explains. The site also provides links for viewers to contact their legislators and power companies to protest mountaintop removal. "I would encourage everybody to use it as a resource, because we all have a responsibility," says Kohm. Mary Anne Hitt notes that using Google Earth to show the damaged landscapes of Appalachia has made her presentations to legislators, business people, and citizens much more powerful.
Other Worldwatch Articles You Might Enjoy
"My Connection" complements a similar Web-based tool released earlier this month by the Center for Global Development (CGD) in Washington, D.C. CGD's new online database, Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA), documents the carbon emissions of thousands of individual power plants worldwide, giving people access to information they can then use in efforts to reduce fossil fuel pollution in their regions. Coal supplied an estimated 32 percent of fossil fuel energy in 2006, but was responsible for approximately 40 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, according to the Worldwatch Institute's Vital Signs 2007–2008 report.
This story was produced by Eye on Earth, a joint project of the Worldwatch Institute and the blue moon fund. View the complete archive of Eye on Earth stories, or contact Staff Writer Alana Herro at aherro [AT] worldwatch [DOT] org with your questions, comments, and story ideas.


text:
North Atlantic Right Whale
Basic Facts About Right Whales
Right whales like the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) are among the rarest of all marine mammal species. These baleen whales have two separate populations – western and eastern. Commercial whaling decimated the species in the early 1900s. Today, only around 450 North Atlantic right whales remain.
North Atlantic right whales are about 50 feet long and weigh about 70 tons (140,000 lbs.). They have a stocky, black body, no dorsal fin and bumpy patches of rough skin, called callosities, on their head.
North Atlantic right whales eat zooplankton and krill. They take large gulps of water and then filter out their tiny prey using baleen plates. Each side of a right whale's mouth has about 225 baleen plates, which can be up to 8 feet long. During feeding season, usually from spring to fall, right whales may eat more than 2,600 pounds of zooplankton per day.
Historically, there were two populations of North Atlantic right whales – western and eastern. The western North Atlantic right whale population contains roughly 450 individuals. Recent sightings data suggest that the population may be increasing slightly, but is still critically endangered. The eastern population is already nearly, if not completely, extinct.
Habitat & Range
Did You Know?
Right whales got their name because whalers thought they were the "right" ones to hunt, as they float when dead and often swim within sight of the shore.
North Atlantic right whales in their western range are found from Nova Scotia to the southeastern United States and migrate along the length of the east coast of the United States. The eastern North Atlantic right whale population was once found in European waters from the coast of northern Europe to the northwest coast of Africa.
Right whales are slow swimmers, averaging just six miles per hour. They are known to make brief shallow dives in succession before submerging themselves underwater for up to 20 minutes at a time. They usually travel solo or in small groups.
Did You Know?
The right whale's scientific name, Eubalaena glacialis, means "good, or true, whale of the ice."
Right whales are also known to emit low frequency sounds that may be a form of communication. When they feed, the water skimming across their baleen plates creates a clicking "baleen rattle."
Females usually give birth to their first calf at 10 years, and give birth every 3-5 years thereafter. Right whale calves are 13-15 feet long at birth.
Mating Season: Winter
Gestation: 1 year
Litter size: 1 calf
You may also be interested in:
Length 45-55 ft.
Weight Up to 70 tons; females are larger than males.
Lifespan 50-100 years.


text:
TAMPA, FL — Interactive fitness may soon have some research to support its effectiveness in keeping children fit and motivated. The School of Physical Education, Wellness and Sports Studies at the University of South Florida (USF) in Tampa, FL, had an open house last month at its newly opened XRKade Research Lab, where researchers will study interactive fitness. About 100 Y operators, school district personnel, manufacturers and other interested parties attended the event to see the equipment in action.
"We had kids on equipment and as soon as people saw how much fun kids were having and how much they were sweating — it was the visual that you can't capture with words," says Lisa Witherspoon, doctoral student at USF. Witherspoon supervises the lab, which was created because of her interest in this subject for her doctoral program. She plans to use the research to create curriculum for physical education programs using interactive fitness programming.
The XRKade lab was created through donations from iTECH Fitness and the company's corporate partners. Equipment included in the lab are X-Board, Dance Dance Revolution, Game Bikes, 3-Kick, Trazer, iJoy, CoreTrainer and Korebalance.
The lab will investigate the growing movement of technology-based interactive game activities. This movement, coined interactive fitness or exergaming, is increasingly being used by public schools, YMCAs, rec centers and private fitness clubs to help children increase physical activity levels and maintain a healthy weight, says Mike Hansen, CEO and president of iTECH Fitness.
Some of the studies planned involve other departments at USF including psychology, physiology, behavioral science and special education.
"There's no concrete research being done on interactive fitness as a whole," Witherspoon says. "You can find some on individual pieces of equipment but not as a concept as a whole."
Beyond physiological studies, Witherspoon plans studies related to equipment with screens vs. nonscreens, skill development and the motivational factor of interactive fitness.
The study's subjects come from the fifth grade classes at three elementary schools on the USF campus. Each class spends one physical education session each week at the lab. In the future, Witherspoon may expand the research beyond fifth graders and beyond the three schools on campus, she says. She already has a waiting list of children whose parents have seen media coverage and want their kids involved.
She also may expand her research to include adults and senior citizens, she says, adding that much of the equipment can help with balance and core.
"If we can publish something that says interactive fitness and exergaming does encourage the population to be physically active, it's a powerful statement," Witherspoon says. "We want to prove that exercise can be fun."
Some fitness groups already are seeing the benefits of the interactive equipment even before studies have been completed.
"The Ys are already going crazy over this," Witherspoon says. "I won't be surprised if the health clubs won't start picking up on this. Retention is their problem. If you can improve retention, that's what those clubs want. If it's proven that these programs improve retention, it would be a no brainer [to install interactive fitness equipment]."


text:
CHICAGO, July 9 (Reuters) - Last year's U.S. drought, the worst since the Dust Bowl, is delivering its final sting to major grains buyers like Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge Ltd and Cargill Inc, who are paying record-high premiums for dwindling supplies of last year's crops.
Premiums at the moment are as high as $1.75 a bushel above benchmark futures prices on the Chicago Board of Trade, which have been depressed by signs of a record harvest this coming autumn. The most active agriculture contract, December corn , hit a two-year low last week near $4.90 a bushel.
The residual effect of last year's drought has triggered an unprecedented bidding war for immediate supplies. Ethanol plants, soy processors and livestock farmers, unwilling to pay the lofty premiums, are cutting operations instead.
Making matters worse, a soggy spring delayed plantings of soybeans and corn, pushing back the likely arrival of new supplies by several weeks. The supply squeeze is set to peak next month when premiums could shatter existing record levels, inflicting even more pain on grain handlers.
"We will be on fumes come mid-August," said Joe Christopher, a grain buyer at the Crossroads Co-Op in Sidney, Nebraska, referring to scarce supplies of grain in a state that is still engulfed in moderate to extreme drought.
The biggest processors need hundreds deliveries each week of semi-trucks full of corn and soybeans, and not all shipments can be bought in advance.
At the trading floor in Chicago, corn futures have tumbled 16 percent since hitting a record last August, with nearby September corn settling on Tuesday at $5.51-3/4 per bushel. New-crop December dipped below $5 a bushel last week for the first time in 2-1/2 years.
However in Iowa, long the king of corn-growing states, a major processor owned by Cargill Inc was willing to pay $7 or more for bushels delivered this week. The price difference this month between existing grain and grain to be harvested later was the widest ever.
The corn "basis" in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, is a record-high $1.75 above futures, according to Reuters data, up sevenfold from 25 cents above futures a year ago.
The record gap reflects the clash between tight short-term supplies and expectations that U.S. farmers this year will harvest the largest corn and soy crops ever.
Soybeans are even tighter than corn, with U.S. stockpiles expected to fall to a nine-year low of 125 million bushels by the end of August. That amount represents just 4 percent of total soybean usage for the year, the smallest in 48 years.
CBOT July soybean futures touched $16.30 a bushel on Tuesday, the highest nearby price in nine months.
The industry already has seen as many as 15 ethanol plants and soy processors shut down since the start of the drought a year ago due to lack of supply or poor margins. Major units such as Bunge's soy processor in St. Joseph, Missouri, and Cargill's Lafayette, Indiana, plant have idled.
That much capacity has not been offline since 2008, when ethanol makers went bankrupt amid skyrocketing crop prices and a global credit crunch. But analysts say more shutdowns are needed to ration demand to avoid running stockpiles down to zero.
Some ethanol plants that stalled last summer are running profitably again as a surge in crude oil prices to two-year highs made the corn-based fuel additive economical again.
Buyers at soybean processors are willing to pay exorbitant prices for small amounts of the oilseed needed right now. But they don't want to purchase more than needed, because of the risk of owning over-priced product if prices crash as expected once harvest starts this fall.
"You've got a perfect storm brewing for a grain buyer," said Jim Gerlach, president of A/C Trading, a commodity brokerage in Fowler, Indiana. "From his standpoint, not much worse could happen to him. He's in a bad fix. Everything is working out to favor the market staying extended until the new crop arrives."
High corn prices have made wheat a more viable alternative. POET Biorefining bought some wheat this year to grind into ethanol. Poultry and cattle producers this year are expected to feed their animals record amounts of wheat, traditionally a crop reserved for human consumption.
It remains unclear whether high premiums may coax additional grain supplies into the market. Farmers who sold most of last year's diminished haul last summer, when futures hit record highs, can now afford to gamble with the remainder. Some may hold out, hoping prices will rise as the squeeze intensifies.
Prices for soybean meal, a key source of protein in feed for hogs and poultry, have soared above $500 a ton, prompting hog feeders to adjust rations to use as little as possible.
"Right now producers are doing as much to replace it, down as low as we can go, without reducing performance," said Gene Gourley, who raises sows in Webster City, Iowa.
Tyson Foods Inc and Smithfield Foods Inc have said they have imported corn and soybean products from South America for livestock. These imports only provide a small buffer for areas near ports in the southeastern United States. It is too expensive to ship supplies where they are most needed in the heart of the interior Corn Belt.
"What limits our imports is the fact a vast majority of our (soy) crush is away from the coast. So you have to import and then you have to move it in from the door, up to where the crush plants are. It's not cheap, and it takes time," said Anne Frick, senior oilseeds analyst at Jefferies Bache in New York.
Indiana dairy farmer Mike Yoder is buying grain on a weekly basis, hopeful prices decline as farmers and traders become more confident that frequent U.S. rainfall will bring a bumper harvest. Yoder sold 50 cows earlier this year after selling 85 of his milking cows last year to stop the flow of red ink and stretch feed supplies. He may have to sell more.
"I just buy it as we need it, hoping that as we get into July that we have good weather during pollination that it will soften that price a little bit. That's what we are counting on," Yoder said. "If something happens to that corn crop and prices stay in that upper-$6 and low-$7 range, we are going to sell more cows."


text:
110 beautiful, bucolic miles. 10,000 vertical feet of climbing or so. Road, broken road and dirt road. Point to point format. Four overflowing feed zones on the route will feature delicious snacks on the go and refreshing beverages as well. Your bag with your warm dry clothes will be waiting for you at the finish. Post ride buffet with all you care to eat. After you're full of food and happy, we'll take everyone and their bikes home via chartered coaches.
Start point is in SF, easy freeway access, lots of easy parking, ten minute bike ride from CalTrain and BART. Start time is 9:00AM.
Worried about getting lost? Don't be, you will be provided with a hi-res map and cue card with turn by turn directions.
Save the dates: March 24th and April 21st.


text:
Last Saturday morning, I woke up feeling downright peaceful. Here it was, less than two weeks before Christmas and, because I had shopped early and planned carefully, I was coasting into a low-stress holiday.
The presents were purchased and wrapped. The tree was decorated. The cookies were baked. I had nothing left to do but relax and bask in this unfamiliar sense of calm.
So I decided to paint the living room.
The full text of this article is only available to online subscribers.
Are you an online subscriber? Click to login.
Click here to learn more about our subscription options.
If you have a print subscription, you can now add an online subscription at no additional charge! Just email us with your name and mailing address to set it up.
Here we are as in olden days
Happy golden days of yore
Faithful friends who are dear to us
Gather near to us once more
Does Christmas ever go that way these days, I wonder — as it does in "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" and all the old holiday standards?
Our world is so fractionated, our faithful friends so far away. If those golden days of yore ever did exist, it often seems they won't come again.
Note from the Online Editor: The Web team here at the Addison Independent is very excited to introduce our first community blogger — Rebecca Reimers, a Brandon resident, parent, and educational consultant. Rebecca will be sharing her thoughts about southern Addison County and the town of Brandon in "View from the Borderland," a series of blog posts on our Web site. In the months ahead, she'll profile local residents and businesses, tackle issues of local history, roam Brandon's cemeteries, write about her home and her family, and more.
Subscribe to Online Edition
Online PDF Print Edition
Copyright 2011 Addison Independent | 58 Maple Street, Middlebury, Vt. 05753 | All Rights Reserved
Site Development by Surf New Media


text:
Posts Tagged ''The Night Mail' (W.H. Auden)'
Dr. Bedřich Bělohlávek (1902 – 1991)
My father was born in Czechoslovakia, in 1902.
His parents, Bedrich and Ruzena, were innkeepers from Pisek in southern Bohemia.
When my father was two years old, the family moved to Pribram, about fifty miles away from Prague. Pribram was then a prosperous mining town, its fortune built on silver.
His parents ran a small hotel, and also the café and restaurant attached to the town's railway station.
In 1905, they produced a daughter, Ruzena, who died in 1907 and is buried in Pribram. My father never mentioned her existence, and I was greatly surprised to find out that he had not been an only child, after all.
From an early age, my father showed a rather precocious talent for music, and learnt to play the piano, entertaining the café and restaurant customers with popular tunes at mealtimes. He later studied the piano and composition at Prague Conservatoire, but instead of taking up music as a career became the music critic of Rude Pravo – the leading Czech Socialist newspaper, based in Prague.
By 1924 he was supplanted by the Communist historian Zdenek Nejedly (1878-1962), and went instead to the Social Democratic newspaper Pravo Lidu as film critic.
In the same year, he set up Dobra Edice, a small publishing house, specialising in poetry, essays, and belles lettres. The books were produced with superb attention to detail, and were classic examples of European graphic design of the period. The example shown to the left Povoden Hlouposti was the result of my father being thrown out of Prague's National Theatre. As a music critic, he had written a blistering attack on the entrenched attitude of the orchestra to rehearsals of a new work (Alban Berg's 'Wojcek') and the musicians took offence. They refused to begin the evening's performance while he remained in his critic's seat, and several players pursued him out of the building, fists shaking. Alban Berg wrote a heartfelt letter of thanks for the stand my father had taken. The last publication appeared in 1934.
His opera libretto, Pred slunce východem ('Before Sunrise') was premiered as part of a double-bill at Prague's National Theatre on 24th October, 1925. Composed by Emil F. Burian, it was directed by Ferdinand Pujman, with settings by Vlastislav Hofman. Conducted by Otokar Ostrcil, the opera was performed several times. It is set outside the Garden of Eden, with Eve about to give birth to the child of man.
In 1937, my father married. His bride was Frantiska Ungerova, a native of Prague, who had been brought up inVienna. Their wedding took place in Bulgaria, in Sofia Cathedral.
With the coming of the Nazis, my father fled to England. His journey was made possible by an influential acquaintance, who enabled him to make contact with the exiled Czech government based in London.
While there, he planned what was to be the first festival of British Film to take place outside the UK. It opened in Prague in 1946, with a galaxy of leading actors and production personnel from both Britain and Czechoslovakia as guests.
The composer Benjamin Britten (1913-1976) was otherwise engaged, and sent an elegant letter of apology. The film 'The Night Mail' for which W.H. Auden had written the text, and Britten had composed the score, featured among the many documentaries shown.
My father returned briefly to Czechoslovakia in 1947 but the advent of the communist government in 1948 meant a second and permanent departure. He settled with his wife in London, and bought an ill-fated restaurant, Le Tabarin, 46 Gloucester Terrace, London W.2.
It served simple continental dishes, and was much-loved by its customers. Unfortunately, changing times, and my father's over-generous nature meant that it didn't stand a chance.
He became bankrupt, and c.1951 took a job with a London bookseller at No.16 Fleet Street, where he remained on the staff for thirty years. The shop stood next to Prince Henry's Room, a timbered survivor of the Great Fire of London, 1666.
The firm of L. Simmonds was well-known to the legal profession, being in the centre of that world. It stood a few doors away from Middle Temple, and supplied vast quantities of law books, as well as serving local libraries, schools and colleges with more general stock.
My father's boss, Louis Simmonds, was a remarkable man: diminutive in stature (like his wife, Rose) but big in heart, he commanded a loyalty from his staff that is now virtually unknown.
It seemed rare for anyone to leave, under any pretext, and this continuity contributed more than a little to the shop's faintly Dickensian air. Dating from the early eighteenth century, the building had once been a coffee house. It was narrow and rather dusty, but an institution, and much loved by all who knew it. The creaking stairs led to the upstairs stockrooms where books were sorted for local and City libraries.
1951 saw the publication of Who's Next ? The Lesson of Czechoslovakia. My father wrote the book under the pseudonym 'John Brown', and dedicated it to the memory of Jan Masaryk, whose murder he had always deplored.
(Note: The British Library in London now has an almost complete run of Dobra Edice publications, and various other works associated with my father. They can be found through the Slavonic Department, and in the general catalogue.)
Copyright Francis Wright, 2012
Share this:
Written by Francis Wright
August 16, 2014 at 7:10 pm
Posted in Uncategorised
Tagged with 'Pred slunce vychodem' [Before Sunrise]., 'Pred vychodem slunce' [Before Sunrise], 'The Night Mail' (W.H. Auden), Benjamin Britten, Bohemia, cello, Czechoslovakia, Dobra Edice, Dr. Bedrich Belohlavek, Emil F. Burian, Inter-Allied String Quartet, Maria Clementisova, Masaryk, Melos Ensemble, Pisek, Polish Hearth, Prague, Pribram, Smetana, Terence Weil, The Polish Musicians of London


text:
Round Rose Cut Lumiere LMBR3988
Lumiere Bridal designs come complete with a center diamond.
A half carat rose-cut diamond glows in a halo of sprinkled brilliant white diamonds atop gleaming high polished gold in this feminine and stunning design from the Lumiere Bridal Collection.
Ring Details
- 0.33cts of side diamonds D-F, SI
- 0.47ct Center Diamond
- Rose Cut Center Diamond
Your Order Includes
- Lumiere Bridal LMBR4131
- Ring Box
- Insured FedEx Packaging
- Jewelry Appraisal
Available in Platinum, as well as 14K/18K White, Yellow or Rose Gold.
This ring can be modified to accommodate a variety of center stone shapes, types, and colors.
Please Contact Us if you would like to customize this design or fill out our Custom Quote Form.
All pieces are made to order with 1-5 weeks production time, please contact us for item availability.
- Made to Order - This piece needs to be handmade, and typically take 4-6 weeks to finish
- Ready to Ship - We have the piece in stock, and it can be shipped within 2 Business Days
Delivery Options
- In-Store Pick-Up - You can place your order online, and pick it up in-store for free. This is a great option if you live near Huntington Beach, CA. Click Here for our location and hours.
- 2Day - Complimentary 2Day Shipping for all domestic online orders over $500. This service is fully insured and safe with signature required at pick up.
- Overnight - You may upgrade any order to Overnight for an extra $50. If you have placed an order and would like to upgrade shipping please contact us as soon as possible.
- International Priority - International orders are shipped International Priority with insurance. The price varies depending on the country and can be calculated at checkout. International customers will be responsible for any duties, VAT, taxes or surcharges levied or charged by their country, so please check local regulations prior to placing your order to confirm taxes and duties.
All of our jewelry is manufactured using the highest quality materials and is inspected prior to shipment. We stand behind everything that we sell and warrant that all items will be free from any manufacturing defects at the time of delivery. Our lifetime warranty offers free prong tightening, re-polishing, rhodium plating and cleaning services. We also include complimentary diamond replacements for the first 12 months.
In the event that there is ever a problem with your jewelry or you are in need of other services that are not covered under our lifetime warranty, your jewelry can be mailed back to our office for evaluation. Once inspected, should charges apply, you will be notified prior to any work being done to service your jewelry.
Please Contact Us if you have any questions or would like to return your item(s) to take advantage of our free lifetime warranty or request additional repair work needed to service your Princess Bride Diamonds jewelry.


text:
I met Marisa walking down 40th Street in Manhattan late one October afternoon. She had just crossed Broadway when I spotted her and asked her about her tattoos. Namely, these two gracing the back of her calves:
These tattoos are based on the work of artist John R. Neill, who illustrated L. Frank Baum's Wizard of Oz books. The female figure in both designs is Polychrome, the Rainbow's daughter.
Both legs were tattooed at Rock Star Tattoos in Honolulu. Conor did the left calf:
and Kazan did the right:
Marisa has 11 tattoos in all. Incidentally, having heard she grew up in Hawai'i, I played the small-world game with her and discovered we both had the same history teacher, two decades apart, when he taught at different schools.
Like many people who have Oz tattoos, Marisa loved the books and was inspired by the magic in them, vividly illustrated.
Thanks to Marisa for stopping on the street and consenting to share her wonderful tattoos with us here on Tattoosday!


text:
PHILADELPHIA (AP) Alex Henery's kickoffs frequently don't reach the end zone, making it imperative for the Philadelphia Eagles to improve their coverage.
David Wilson nearly broke loose for a touchdown a few times against the Eagles in Philadelphia's 19-17 win over the New York Giants last Sunday night. Wilson averaged 36.2 yards on six returns, including ones of 48, 45 and 53 yards.
That led the Eagles (3-1) to make some changes on special teams. Brian Rolle, a second-year linebacker who started several games last year, was released. He was replaced by linebacker Adrian Moten, who could see action against Pittsburgh (1-2) on Sunday.
``He's definitely a tough, young scrapper,'' special teams coordinator Bobby April said. ``He looks like one of those guys in Rocky III when Rocky comes in all Dapper Dan and the guys drop their gloves from punching the bag and they're stripped down, ready to rumble. He's kind of got that attitude.''
Moten played in 12 games for Indianapolis and Seattle as a rookie last year and spent training camp with the Eagles before he was let go on the final roster cut. He's eager to make his mark on special teams.
``I showed I'd give it my all when I was here,'' he said. ``I'm going to come in wanting to play special teams a lot. I know that's the biggest thing they brought me in for, but you never know how the NFL goes. It's a business, so you never know. I could be playing linebacker one week. You never know. So, I'll come in and do whatever they need me to do.''
The Eagles are hoping the addition of Moten coupled with the return of special teams ace Colt Anderson does the trick on coverage. It also will help when linebacker Akeem Jordan, another special teams standout, returns from injury. Philadelphia is ranked next-to-last in kickoff coverage, allowing 27.1 yards per return.
``Special teams is just an attitude and we've got to get the right attitude,'' Anderson said. ``We've got to have confidence in what we're doing and we're going to get that fixed.''
Moten is all about attitude.
``I'm going to be a ball hawk,'' he said. ``Go get the ball.''
It certainly would help if Henery boomed his kickoffs into the end zone. But he's last in the league with a 22.2 touchback percentage (4 of 18). Still, Eagles coach Andy Reid wouldn't pin the blame for the coverage problems against the Giants solely on Henery.
``Well, a couple of the kickoffs were a bit short,'' Reid said. ``Hang time is important, but we had guys in position around that 25-yard line at the catch. So, you've got to make sure that you work the right techniques, have the right scheme, right techniques. We should be OK and the kicker's got to do his job, too. But I wouldn't say that that was the No. 1 thing, no.''
April pointed the finger at himself for not giving Henery enough preparation on kickoffs going into the game last week. The Eagles had a unique situation because they signed a new punter, Mat McBriar, and had to practice with a new long snapper because Jon Dorenbos was injured. McBriar is the also the holder so April emphasized the snap and hold last week.
``I didn't do the right thing in training him,'' April said. ``He was off a little bit in his steps and he didn't do as many full length kickoffs as he normally does. He is still delegated the responsibility of going to kick the ball well. He's not getting the pass on this. We did so many field goals last week because we had a new snapper and a new holder. I really wanted his leg to be as spry as it could be for game day. We cut back a little bit on his kickoffs.
``That was a miscalculation on my part.''
NOTES: Jordan (hamstring) won't play against the Steelers. Anderson (knee), LT King Dunlap (hamstring) and DT Derek Landri (knee) are questionable. Reid wouldn't say whether Dunlap or Demetress Bell would start. Bell has started the past two games after losing his job following the first preseason game.
Follow Rob Maaddi on Twitter:https://twitter.com/RobMaaddi
Online:http://pro32.ap.org/poll andhttp://twitter.com/AP-NFL


text:
jane. shimmering bronzer in Tahiti
I wanted to finally try one of those multi-colored blushes/bronzers without wasting too much money. I was in my local drugstore and decided to pick one up. A trip isn't complete unless i buy at least one new cosmetic, or two. The drugstore brand jane. had some cool looking ones. I actually use it as blush. Loving shimmer and bronze, it's not too sparkly. With enough of the product, it gives a subtle shimmer. It comes in a convenient compact like HIP shadows; one side product, the other side is casing with a small mirror and brush. Keeper!
Revlon LipGlide in Natural Glow
Convinced by the Eva Mendez photo for the ad, the Natural Glow shade looked great. Of course I want my lips to look like Eva Mendez, but that's not the case. However, it's a flesh colored lip product that gives you a natural vibrance to your lips. Keeper!
Wet n Wild Glassy Gloss
Something new from the our favorite dollar drug store cosmetic Wet n Wild: a glassy gloss pot. Nice colors, good product for a great price. Since I got a color very similar to everything else I own, this doesn't stand out among the products. Still a keeper!
*Rediscovered on my dresser:
Nars the Multiple in Palm Beach
I always read raves of Nars blush. Everyone's favorite is Orgasm. I tried it on during a Sephora frenzy, but didn't find it to be outstanding. Beautiful color-- maybe I didn't have enough on? I passed it up being content that I own an amazing creme colour/blush, MAC's Impropper Copper. That's some stuff to rave about! (Unfortunately, its a summer color for its high shimmer.) I was going through an old makeup bag and found this Nars the multiple. Now this is something that I decided was great. Great color, without the high shine so that it can be used across seasons.
Givenchy Amarige Fragrance
I received a sample of this and decided that it was lovely. I didn't take to it when I first smelled it on the bottle at the department store. I wore it around and found it to be a nice scent. Not too young, not too mature, but struck a nice balance. Now I'm not sure if it's actually Amarige or a derivative... but I hear they are all similar. Many of the perfume critics don't like it and take it not to be anything close to Givenchy's best work. It does smell very familiar, but it's okay for an average girl like myself. I'm enjoying the samples, but don't think it deserves a bottle purchase. Some of the notes (if it is Amarige Mariage) bitter orange, bergamot, patchouli, and sandalwood.
Avon's Sweet Honesty Body Creme
I received this Avon set as a gift, complete with body cream, talc and deodorant. Great moisture whipped body lotion with a soft scent of-...... bubblebath? The scent is a mix of rose, amber and spice. I swear, I try to stay away from amber, but it constantly creeps up on me. When I first rubbed it into my skin, I thought that the scent would bother me, annoy me. That classic Avon scent. Actually, as I wore it throughout the day, it's very subtle and I like to sniff it to remind myself of one of life's simple pleasures- a warm, relaxing bubble bath! Subtle enough to be layered or not to intrude with a real fragrance that I may prefer to wear.