text:
Candied Ginger
From: Munchin with Munchkin
Quick Facts
Servings: 24
Prep Time: 15 min.
Cook Time: 1 hr. 45 min.
Total: 2 hr.
Add some heat when the weather gets cold with the spicy zing of ginger!
- 3 cups fresh ginger, peeled and sliced into thin discs
- 2 cups sugar
- 2 cups water
- Bring a medium pot of water to a boil. Place ginger in the pot and simmer for 10 minutes. Discard the water (or reserve it for a hot toddy) and rinse ginger under cool water.
- Place two cups of water and two cups of sugar in a medium saucepan. Bring to a boil to dissolve the sugar.
- Add ginger to the sugar water and simmer on low heat for 1 to 1 ½ hours. Remove from heat and strain.
- Carefully move the ginger to a rack and sprinkle with sugar. Let them dry for 8 to 10 hours in a cool dry place, turning them halfway through.
- Store in a sealed container.
Nutrition Facts
Calories 74
Calories from Fat 1 (1%)
(0%)Total Fat 0g
(0%)Saturated Fat 0g
Polyunsaturated Fat 0g
Monounsaturated Fat 0g
(0%)Cholesterol 0mg
(0%)Sodium 2mg
(1%)Potassium 50mg
Total Carbohydrate 19g
(1%)Dietary Fiber 0g
Sugars 17g
Sugar Alcohols 0g
(0%)Protein 0g
* Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.
Nutrition facts are calculated by a food expert using nutritional values provided by the USDA for common products used as recipe ingredients. Actual nutritional values may differ depending on the amounts or products used and can be affected by cooking methods.
Copyright © 2019 Healthnotes, Inc. All rights reserved. www.healthnotes.com
Read our healthy recipe definitions.
Learn more about Healthnotes, the company.
The information presented here is for informational purposes only and was created by a team of US–registered dietitians and food experts. Consult your doctor, practitioner, and/or pharmacist for any health problem and before using any supplements, making dietary changes, or before making any changes in prescribed medications. Information expires December 2019.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Types of Aid & Scholarships
There are several types of aid available to students at Piedmont Technical College. Typically, students at PTC receive a mix of these types of aid. The mix you'll receive is determined by your financial need and the information you provide when you apply. Explore the information below to learn more.
Federal programs available to you include the Pell grant and the Federal Supplemental Opportunity Grant.
The state of South Carolina provides three types of aid to students: Lottery Tuition Assistance, the LIFE Scholarship, and the South Carolina Need-based Grant. »
Several types of loans are available to PTC students to help supplement the state of federal aid you receive.
PTC makes a wide variety of Scholarships available to students. Each has different eligibility requirements, so browse the information on this page to see which is a fit for you.
In addition to the types of aid referred to above, we also have a Federal Work Study Program for students.


text:
Latest: Discover the Latest Advances in Laboratory Automation, Automated Incubation and Sample...
Latest: IMMUNOLOGY 2019: 5 Exhibition Highlights You May Have Missed
Latest: SLAS Europe 2019: Are You a Match for the TTP Labtech dragonfly® discovery?
Latest: Reduce Metal Detector Testing and Reap the Benefits
Latest: How Scientists Can Predict the Properties of Energy Crops for Efficient Conversion of...
Latest: Small Molecule Identification with Mass Spectrometry
Latest: Benefits of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for Polymer Analysis
New Automated Cell Counter Helps Reduce Plastic Waste in Your Lab
Visit SelectScience at SLAS Europe 2019 and Take Part in Our Exclusive T-Shirt Giveaway
7 Ways PURA Water Baths Promise to Streamline Laboratory Workflows
New InGaAs Area Image Sensor for Hyperspectral Cameras
7 Top Mass Spectrometry Innovations from ASMS 2019
Impurities in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients: Limiting Potential Carcinogenic Risk
Advanced Development of Primary Pancreatic Organoid Tumor Models for High-Throughput Phenotypic...
A Framework for Using CLSI Documents to Evaluate Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures
Essential Guide to Quality Control in Cell-Based Assays
Infographic of Agilent's Pharma Lab Leaders Survey Results
Fluorescent Image Analysis – Cell Division in Spheroids
Examining 3D Damage in a Fiber Composite Using a Multiscale Scout-and-Zoom Workflow
Hematology Analyzers & Stainers
Clinical Chemistry Analyzers
Microplate Readers
Flow Cytometry for Screening
Pre-Clinical and Clinical Lab Automation
Multiplexing Technology
SLAS Europe 2019 Conference...
26 Jun 19 - 28 Jun 19
04 Aug 19 - 08 Aug 19
Lab Innovations
30 Oct 19 - 31 Oct 19
ELRIG Drug Discovery 2019
05 Nov 19 - 06 Nov 19
In this application article, find out how the MA160 Rapid IR-Moisture Analyzer, with an integrated method development assistant, is designed to make it as easy as possible to find the right method parameters for your sample.
Download this Article
MA160 Infrared Moisture Analyzer


text:
CrackBerry Birthday Contest: Leave a comment to this post making your "BlackBerry Wish" and we'll make it come true for one lucky winner!
Happy Birthday CrackBerry Nation! That's right... Sunday, February 26th, 2012 marks FIVE years to the day that we fired off our Hello World Press Release and officially opened our doors to CrackBerry.com. And what an *amazing* five years it has been.
To our longtime readers and members who have been here for the whole journey, you know what we've achieved together over the years and we thank you for the ongoing love and support. To those who have discovered CrackBerry more recently, we hope you continue to visit for years to come. It's funny, you'd think after five years we'd be a little tired, but we're more energized than ever. With BlackBerry 10 phones on the horizon and a lot of great plans for the site in the works, it's an exciting time to be part of CrackBerry Nation. Heck, we even set a record this week in our forums for the most people online at one time!
BIRTHDAY CONTEST - Make a BlackBerry Wish and you could Win It!
In true CrackBerry birthday fashion, we're celebrating with a contest. We couldn't decide what to give away as a prize, so we're leaving it up to you. All you need to do is leave a comment to this post with your "CrackBerry BlackBerry Wish" and we're going to make it come true for one lucky winner. Want a BlackBerry 10 phone when it becomes available? Or maybe a Porsche Design P'9981 BlackBerry? How about a trip to BlackBerry World in Orlando this year? Close your eyes, pick that BB thing you want most, and make that wish!! Good Luck!


text:
Interesting and useful experiments course for chemistry teachers of secondary school Tomoko Sato | added on Aug 12, 2011 | Japan Chemistry teachers of scondary schools in Japan have been in trouble overnot enough students who like chemistry and been trying to show interesting experiments in front of students. So we could like to help them by intersting useful experiments.
|chemistry education, educational materials, seminars, hands-on activities, demonstrations, workshops, biotechnology
|secondary school teachers


text:
The Iron & Steel Technology Conference and Exposition (AISTech) will be held May 5 to 8 at the Indiana Convention Center, Indianapolis. This year will feature more than 500 exhibitors and more than 500 technical presentations. For steel-industry professionals with backgrounds from production to processing, this will be a chance to stay up-to-date with technology breakthroughs and the global marketplace, and improve their knowledge.
Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.
The three-day technical program will showcase the scope of today's steel production. The presentations will provide insight on the latest in ironmaking, steelmaking, rolling and finishing processes, and technologies used. The program features sessions in more than 25 categories. In addition to the sessions on iron and steelmaking, and rolling processes, sessions are offered for safety, maintenance, environmental management, and other applications. The complete list of presentations, and detailed descriptions of sessions can be found online here.
AISTech offers special events and presentations during the show. The first presentation on, May 5, is the Brimacombe Memorial Lecture. Keynote speaker David K. Matlock, University Emeritus Professor, Colorado School of Mines, will discuss university and industry partnerships in the steel industry. Next is the International Alliance Lecture with Jiang Li, chief market analyst, Baosteel. Her presentation is "The Challenges of the Chinese Steel Industry."
Additional Presentations
The President's Awards Breakfast is held on May 6. AIST president Terry G. Fedor II, Cliffs Natural Resources, will host. Mark D. Millett, president and CEO, Steel Dynamics Inc., will present at the breakfast ways to make money in the steel industry.
A town-hall forum titled "Steel 2014: Building a Pipeline to the Future" will be held May 7. A panel of seven top steel-industry executives will address challenges and opportunities relevant to today's steel industry. Topics for discussion include new technologies, global and regional overcapacity, market development for steel applications, and more.
Plant tours are also offered during the show. The tours give a firsthand look into the iron and steel factory processes, and an opportunity to see the technology in action. The three plants are Nucor Steel — Indiana, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, and Steel Dynamics Inc. — Engineered Bar Products Division. Tickets for the tours are limited and can be purchased upon registration for AISTech.
For more information on AISTech 2014 and to register, visit www.AISTech.org.
Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.


text:
QSC AG: Communication services for SMEs – simple, meaningful, efficient.
IR Releases
freenet and QSC forge long-term network partnership
Kiel/Cologne, June 10th, 2010 - freenet Cityline GmbH, a member of the freenet Group, and QSC AG, a leading mid-size services provider in the... Read more
QSC improves profitability and free cash flow in first quarter of 2010
Free cash flow advances to € 4.6 million Net income more than doubles to € 3.2 million EBITDA rises to € 19.6 million 2010 guidance... Read more
QSC again focusing on strengthening financial position and profitability in 2010
Cologne, March 31, 2010. QSC AG today presented its 2009 Annual Report. There were no changes from the preliminary numbers that were announced on... Read more
QSC significantly improves financial position and profitability in 2009
Preliminary results for 2009 Free cash flow totals € 12.9 million Net debts entirely eliminated EBITDA advances to € 76.9 million EBITDA... Read more
QSC AG: Focus on strengthening profitability and financial position paying off
EBITDA rises to € 19.2 million in third quarter of 2009 Net income reaches € 2.1 million Positive free cash flow stands at € 2.6 million Net... Read more


text:
LANSING (AP) — Democratic members of Michigan's congressional delegation and those serving in the state Legislature are pressing their case against right-to-work legislation in the final hours before its likely passage.
Sen. Carl Levin and House Democrats met with Republican Gov. Rick Snyder Monday and say they urged him to veto the bills limiting unions' power that he has pledged to sign. Meanwhile, Michigan House leaders called for more debate before the GOP-led state Legislature takes final action on the measures as early as Tuesday.
The state House and Senate approved bills last week that would prohibit requiring non-union employees to financially support unions at their workplace.
Lansing authorities are bracing for an onslaught of protesters Tuesday. They have increased police presence and plan road closings and parking restrictions around the Capitol.


text:
Dan Uggla would bring much needed power and RBI support to a Giants team that hasn't had those two things since Bonds' absence.
I'm running high right now. The Giants have just won four straight as they swept the Atlanta Braves and took the first game against the St. Louis Cardinals, their last home series before they hit the road for an NL East swing against Washington and Florida. If the Giants can take two out of three at the very least against the Cardinals this will be big momentum before they hit their interleague series against the hated Oakland A's (yes they are rivals. They swept us in the 1989 Earthquake Series and I have declared Holy War on them since). The Nationals and Marlins are reeling and there is no reason to think why we can't take five out of six or even sweep both series. Well...that might be asking a lot, but we should take four out of six against the Nats and Marlins at the very least. Furthermore, we follow up against the D'Backs after the Marlins series and with the way that team is reeling (with the exception of Justin Upton), the opportunity is there for the Giants to make a big run to pass up the hot Padres and gain some ground on the scorching Dodgers.
The thing is though, our hitting is still lousy. The bats are starting to improve after that lousy 2-9 stretch in Mid-May, but in the long-haul, there really just isn't enough hitting in the lineup for the Giants to make a serious run. Bengie Molina is mired in an awful slump that exhibits why he shouldn't be the Giants cleanup hitter and Pablo Sandoval, our best hitter of the year so far, simply doesn't have the kind of power that can make the team contenders. He's a great contact guy, don't get me wrong. He puts the ball in play and the ball finds holes, but you can't count on him for that big home run or that big double. That just isn't his game nor his style of hitting. He's less reminiscent to a power hitter like Pujols or Bonds and more akin to a slow-slap hitter like Billy Butler. Great contact hitter, puts the ball in play, but you're pretty much getting singles out of the guy and that's it.
The only thing worthwhile is that the Giants pitching, especially starting pitching has been phenomenal. Tim Lincecum, whom I ripped in an earlier post after Opening Week, has looked like his old self. Matt Cain is finally getting some run support and looking like the ace we always knew he would be. Jonathan Sanchez is looking like he always is (great on some days, bad on days when his control is not on) but that is not a bad thing, because when he rides a hot streak, he can be one of the best pitchers on the staff. Even Barry Zito, the 100 plus million dollar man, isn't looking bad. He has been putting out alright outings, but unfortunately, a combination of poor defense and lousy hitting has been his Achilles heel so far that has produced his third straight poor win-loss record out of the gate.
The relief pitching really is the only thing holding the pitching back, mainly because Brian Wilson is a shell of his former self and the set up guys have been inconsistent. Bobby Howry is a perfect example. Totally shuts down the meat of the order against St. Louis last night, but he had nights before when he just gets rocked. If Howry can get some consistency, there is no reason our bullpen can't close the door on the close games. That used to be their MO last year: bullpen closing the door on tight games. And that was with less run support and worse hitting.
So what do the Giants do in order to get in the mix in this NL West Race which looks like Dodgers and everyone else? Well...first they need to solve the Padres. The Giants are a woeful 0-6 at Petco Park this year. While they did sweep a two game series from the Padres in April, that was at a time when the Padres were reeling as well. The Giants have played well against the Dodgers since getting massacred during the opening week. But the Padres have been a different story and the Giants need to get those woeful performances solved. If it's a three-team race between the Padres, Giants and Dodgers, things won't look so good. But if it's narrowed down to a two-team race between the Giants and Dodgers, the odds look a lot better.
Another thing the Giants need to do is get a legitimate power hitter. It's been the priority the fans have been clamoring for even though Sabean is a knucklehead and continues to think guys like Travis Ishikawa and Jesus Guzman are the answers to get it done. Look, I know the Giants are a different team from the Bonds days and I like it. I like that they're more about speed and stretching hits out. I really have come around on Emmanuel Burriss, who is starting to show people why he should be the everyday second baseman. Juan Uribe has been a nice little pickup who's given the lineup some much needed spark (and I think for the time being, we should start Uribe at third and put Sandoval at first. Uribe's a better hitter than Ishikawa and I think Sandoval is more suited for first base anyways). And Aaron Rowand leading off strangely enough has given the Giants lineup the perk that they needed after that woeful mid-May stretch.
Yet there still is that missing run producer that could take this Giants team from good to great. The good thing is, this problem is solvable. There are guys on the market that can come in and help the team immediately. The bad thing is, Sabean is the worst GM in the league and whether or not he has the smarts to make a moves is something to be determined. Here are a few guys I believe the Giants should make serious runs for.
Nick Johnson: I like getting Nick Johnson for various reasons, and reporters everywhere are sure that he's one of the first players to be moved this season. One, you can't overestimate the value of getting a guy that is in the same league. While we have seen exceptions to the rule before (Manny and C.C. last season) for the most part, there has always been a drop off when guys switched from one league to the other. Nomar had a drop off when he went to the Cubs down the stretch and the Cubs suffered for it. Renteria has struggled whenever he has gone to American League ballclubs. So getting a guy from the Nationals is a positive move, just because he is already used to the pitching in the National league. In addition, what makes this trade so tantalizing is Johnson is a northern California guy. He played at McClatchy High School in Sacramento, Calif. A guy familiar with the area can be a wonderful thing. He'll feel right at home and won't need much time to get used to the area. And lastly, and most importantly, the guy can hit. He's healthy for the first time in a while and he has been a catalyst for a rather meager Nationals ballclub. Currently, he's batting .335 with four home runs and 26 RBIs. In addition, he's always been a solid on base guy and can take advantage of the gaps, a quality that is beneficial in a spacious ballpark such as AT&T Park. If the Giants can land this guy for a few minor league arms, (which the Nationals need because there pitching is ridiculously poor), the Giants could make a tremendous leap in terms of improving their mediocre offensive numbers.
Dan Uggla: He's struggling actually right now (.207 average, 9 HRs, 34 RBIs) and the Marlins have always showed in the past that they always want to get younger. With a lot of young farm guys coming up and the Marlins looking as if they are going to be an afterthough in the competitive NL East, an expected fire-sale of big name guys could happen very soon, much sooner than usual. Uggla would bring much needed power to the Giants lineup and could be the kind of second baseman that might bring back for fans memories of Jeff Kent, one of the best second baseman the Giants have ever had. Like Kent, Uggla isn't much of a fielder, but they don't need him to be really. Kent was an average fielder as well, but he was able to take advantage of the Giants home ballpark and was a catalyst behind Bonds in the lineup. With Molina fading fast in the cleanup spot, Uggla coming to San Francisco could be the pop to help the Giants compete with the loaded Dodgers. Furthermore, this could be a win-win for both sides. For the Giants, they get a better hitter, and for Uggla, he gets a fresh start and gets to be "the man" something he really hasn't had in Florida with Hanley Ramirez the main headliner.
Carlos Lee: I've been reading up on this one on a couple of blogs and I'm not exactly convinced, but I'm not totally closed to this idea as well. There is a lot Lee can bring to the table for the Giants. He'll obviously be an immediate power threat not to mention a run-driving threat that Giants have lacked since Bonds was let go. Granted, for all of Lee's inadequacies (lousy fielder, shaky personality) the one thing he does have going for him is that he has always been a consistent hitter. In his tenure with the White Sox, Brewers and Astros his stats have always been around the same, and that is what the Giants have lacked in their lineup. Molina is up one month, down the other. Same thing with every guy in this Giants lineup 1-8. A force like Lee not only would give the Giants lineup a consistent threat, but could also add confidence in the hitters, who'll not feel the pressure like they usually do with runners on. Molina won't need to be the man, and can bat lower in the lineup which he is more suited for. The only roadblock in this is money. He costs a lot and his arrival undoubtedly would mean Fred Lewis or Randy Winn would be packing their bags (most likely Lewis, who I like a lot). But the Giants should definitely look into this, especially since a big-hitting veteran presence could do this young team some good.
So those are some of my thoughts about the Giants as of today. Hopefully they can take their fifth in a row but with Carpenter on the mound, I'm highly skeptical.


text:
We are looking for a licensed Hearing Instrument or Board Certified Hearing Instrument Specialist for the Reno/Sparks Area.
An estimated 36 million Americans are hearing-impaired, and that number will continue to grow as the population ages. Hearing loss doesn't only impact the individual, it impacts families, friends, and communities. Miracle-Ear is at the forefront of changing these lives.
Our franchise partners are looking to train the next generation of hearing care professionals with a passion for helping others. People always need healthcare; no matter the time of year or economic conditions someone will need you, and that's a great foundation for your career.
Receive a competitive salary that grows as you recommend the best hearing solutions for each patient's unique needs. Lean-in to discover how Miracle-Ear can bring value to someone's life, and help patients hear a better day.
At Miracle-Ear®, we want to do everything we can to help connect people to hearing health care. Through the Miracle-Ear Foundation®, in partnership with Miracle-Ear centers, we have donated over 10,000 hearing aids to more than 6,000 individuals who could not afford to receive the hearing health care they need. Join the Miracle-Ear team today, and help us give the gift of sound to communities all across America.
We are an equal opportunity employer and value diversity at our company. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran status, or disability status. If selected for an interview, please advise our Human Resources team if you require accommodation during the interview and assessment process and we will work with you to meet your accessibility needs.
Software Powered by iCIMS


text:
About NIJ
What's New
All Topics A-Z
Contact Us
Text size:
Print this page
E-mail this page
On this page find:
Some jurisdictions have developed innovative approaches to improve their response to elder mistreatment, such as instituting special elder abuse prosecution units, forming elder fatality review teams, and expanding and improving statutes that mandate abuse reporting for vulnerable adults. Although these approaches show promise, they are in the nascent stages of development and have not been rigorously evaluated. Similarly, Adult Protective Services (APS) vary widely across the country, and research related to screening, risk assessment and interventions used by APS is limited.
NIJ funded a team of researchers to develop a computerized decision support system for elder abuse.[1] The Elder Abuse Decision Support System (EADSS) contains assessments for physical, sexual, and psychological abuse; neglect; and financial exploitation. In Phase 1, the team assessed infrastructure requirements and "end-user criteria" through an environmental and infrastructure scan. They held meetings with key informants from the Illinois Department on Aging, teleconferences with national experts, and focus groups and interviews with practitioners and local experts. In Phase 2, the researchers developed the prototype using computerized adaptive testing methods and other appropriate measurement formats. In Phase 3, they demonstrated the prototype and held a second round of focus groups and interviews with local and national experts to elicit feedback regarding its usefulness, quality and affordability. NIJ is funding a follow-up study to pilot test the EADSS in six Illinois APS agencies.
In another NIJ-funded study, investigators worked with APS in New Hampshire to construct and validate a risk assessment tool.[2] The goal of the study was to determine which APS clients were at high risk for future abuse or neglect so that resources could be targeted efficiently to those clients. In the initial stage of the study, New Hampshire's Bureau of Elderly and Adult Services collected data on theoretical and empirical factors related to risk of future abuse or neglect. Among the sample of 763 clients for whom data was collected in Phase 1, the risk classification significantly corresponded to the outcomes the clients experienced. For example, in the six-month follow-up period, 23.9 percent of clients classified as high risk had a subsequent APS investigation, compared with 9.4 percent of clients classified as moderate risk and 5.2 percent of clients classified as low risk. Proportions for founded allegations of abuse were 14.7 percent for high-risk, 4.7 percent for moderate-risk and 2.0 percent for low-risk clients.
The final phase of the study was a validation of the risk assessment tool, using a new set of 1,064 clients who were followed for one year. Unfortunately, the risk assessment did not perform as well in the validation sample as it did in the construction sample. In the validation sample, 22.0 percent of high-risk, 29.0 percent of moderate-risk and 13.1 percent of low-risk clients had subsequent APS investigations. The proportions for founded allegations of abuse were 13.6 percent for high-risk, 10.5 percent for moderate-risk and 7.7 percent for low-risk clients. Although the risk assessment tool statistically corresponded to APS outcomes, investigators must further improve the classification abilities of actuarial tools to make them useful in APS practice.
NIJ funded an evaluation of the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team intervention in addressing elder abuse. The researchers evaluated the Los Angeles County Elder Abuse Forensic Center's effectiveness in prosecuting elder abuse cases, protecting vulnerable older adults, and reducing or preventing recurring cases of abuse.
The researchers used a quasi-experimental design that focused on elder abuse cases involving victims 65 or older. They compared outcomes of two groups: those who received the usual APS care
plus assistance from the Center and those who received only the usual APS care. They found that:
Overall, the study indicated that the Center's model improved prosecution and guardianship outcomes for victims of elder abuse.[3]
Read the
NIJ Journal article Evaluating the Los Angeles County Elder Abuse Forensic Center (pdf, 5 pages).
The Office for Victims of Crime teamed with the American Bar Association (ABA) to produce a
replication manual to help elder abuse fatality teams review the causes of elder deaths and enhance community agencies' response to elder victims of abuse. NIJ also funded the ABA to assess five court-based initiatives across the United States.[4] Investigators conducted site visits, interviewed key stakeholders and analyzed court records to explore initiatives in Alameda County, Calif., Hillsborough County, Fla., Palm Beach County, Fla., Jefferson County, Ky., and Kings County, N.Y. The findings suggest that the court-sponsored initiatives improve the handling of elder abuse cases, but more empirical evidence is needed.
Learn more from the Office for Victims of Crime about elder abuse programs and publications.
Prosecutors face a number of challenges in handling elder abuse cases. Of particular concern is the lack of research on the forensic aspects of elder mistreatment. At present, the medical community cannot easily distinguish between the types of injuries that indicate abuse or neglect and those that are the natural effects of illness or aging.
Learn about research on identifying elder abuse.
There are a number of other challenges:
See the
Department of Justice Elder Justice website for resources for prosecutors.
Next section: Financial Exploitation of the Elderly.
[note 1] Conrad, Kendon J., Madelyn Iris, Barth B. Riley, Edward Mensah, and Jessica Mazza,
Developing End-User Criteria and a Prototype for an Elder Abuse Assessment System, Final report to the National Institute of Justice, grant number 2009-IJ-CX-0202, February 2013, NCJ 241390.
[note 2] Johnson, Kristen, Kathy Park, Andrea Bogie, Shannon Flasch, and Jennifer Cotter,
Developing an Actuarial Risk Assessment to Inform Decisions Made by Adult Protective Services Workers, Final report to the National Institute of Justice, grant number 2008-IJ-CX-0025, December 2012, NCJ 240410.
[note 3] Wilber, Kathleen H., Adria E. Navarro and Zachary D. Gassoumis, "Evaluating the Elder Abuse Forensic Center Model," Final report to the National Institute of Justice, grant number 2009-IJ-CX-0017, April 2014, NCJ 246428.
[note 4] Stiegel, Lori A., and Pamela B. Teaster,
A Multi-Site Assessment of Five Court-Focused Elder Abuse Initiatives, Final report to the National Institute of Justice, grant number 2007-IJ-CX-0107, June 2011, NCJ 238287.
National Institute of Justice, 810 Seventh Street, NW, Washington, DC 20531


text:
I was thinking on the way to work this morning - because, you know, youTube videos of babies with lightsabers should probably not be consumed before breakfast - and I've decided to join the Sith. I mean everyone was all trendy and jumped on the Jedi bandwagon, spawning headlines in the Telegraph like "Jedi the largest alternative religion in the UK" ("alternative" apparently being defined as "not bigger than Jedi".) So its time to move on to the new hip thing - Emo Jedi. And more importantly, I want to get in before all the good names are taken.
So the rules for geting your Sith name are apparently simple:
1) You pick a word you like the sound of that starts with IN. Like INvader, or INsidious.
2) You add Darth and lop off the IN.
The problem is that the prefix IN on a word often means "not", so you have to be careful not to end up with a meaning you didn't quite want. Some names I am considering:
Darth Sulator
Darth Fluenza
Darth Frared
Darth Spector
Darth Cur
Darth K (yo!)
Darth Fidel (apparently already taken by some guy in Cuba who got in way early.)
Some names you might end up stuck with, if you wait too long to join:
Darth Continent
Darth Competent (actually, this is my vote for the new head of our order. We could use some competence.)
Darth Complete
Darth Attentive
Darth Comprehensible
Darth Hospitable
Darth Ept
Darth Flammable
Darth Fomercial
Darth Seminate
Disney, you're welcome to use any of these you like. Darth Brooks does NOT fit the pattern, and is not allowed.
Thursday, April 04, 2013
Sith Names
6 comments:
- Mousicles said...
Can I be Darth Sensible?
- 8:11 am GMT+11
- Mousicles said...
I thought of a few more
Darth Voltini
Darth Ebriated
Darth Vest
Darth Vertibrate
Darth Tresting
Darth Hale
Darth Sipid
- 10:12 am GMT+11
- anti ob said...
Darth Sipid sounds like one of Lucas'.
I've changed my mind; can I be Darth Ebriated?
- 4:05 am GMT+11
- Dawn said...
so does lopping off the "in" reverse the meaning? if so, I wanna be Darth Ept.
- 7:14 pm GMT+10
- MrSnerg said...
Darth Voluntary can be quite helpful.
Darth Sect
Darth Ternational
Darth Tergalactic
Darth Ternet
Darth Jury
and for the uberest nerds:
Darth Terstices
- 9:10 pm GMT+10
- Mousicles said...
Darth Tercostal.
- 10:58 pm GMT+10
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
Now we're in Colossians, chapter 3,and have come to the very, very practical part of the book, verses 18 through chapter 4, verse 1 Col. 3:18 thru 4:1. Now, this particular section is very, very similar in fact, part of it is verbatim from Ephesians, chapters 5 and 6. The parallel is unmistakable, almost identical. And many years ago 4 or 5 -- when we studied Ephesians, we went through some of these same precepts; we've covered some of them in other studies also. And they keep popping up throughout the New Testament. We saw some of these in the 7th chapter of I Corinthians; here they are again. They have to do with the Christian as he lives his life among men. Now, we've been talking in the book of Colossians, particularly, about the individual believer. From Chapter 3, verses 1 through 17, Paul has been discussing the character of the individual Christian, and now he talks about the Christian as he lives in his world, or the new man makes a new home, or the new man approaches his world, the society of the new man, if you will. He talks about how Christianity relates itself to society. It isn't enough to be a Christian and that's all. It's only enough to be a Christian in relationship to other people. It's got to work its way out. I think if we were to analyze this, just to get a running start on it, and talk about the impact that Christianity can have on society, we would agree that the major problem in the world is very simple. It's easy to analyze. The major problem in the world is people. I don't think we'd argue about that. If we could just get rid of the people, we could basically get rid of the problem. And the major problem with people is this: people can't get along with people. The problem is people and the problem with people is that people can't get along with people. The inability of man to get along with his fellow man seem to be the No. 1 problem in our society and in any society in our world. And it telescopes all the way from the inability of a brother and a sister to get along without what psychologists call sibling rivalry all the way to the grandiose kinds of problem of the inability of people to get along, so that you end up in international war. But from the lowest level of a relationship between a brother and a sister when they are children to the high level wars that occur in our world, it's all basically the same problem: people can't get along with people! And Christianity purports to do something about that. Christianity enters into the world and says, 'We not only will do something about an individual, but we offer to an individual the capacity to do something about the people around him, in a positive way." Waldo Beech said that man can be characterized by three words. The first one is "anomie." The second one is "anonymity." And the third me is "alienation." "Anomie" means "no norm" -- "a-norm" if you will - without norm, without standards, without rules -- living by a utilitarian ethic. Beech said, "Man governs his good by pleasure." That's anomie. Secondly, he said man suffers from the problem of "anonymity." Anonymity asks the question "who am I?" He has no sense of being and he has no sense of meaning. And thirdly, the third word that describes man is "alienation." And that defines the fact that man is basically separated. He exists in a world where everybody is basically selfish.
Now, if you want sane other words for this, I'll give you some you might know: immorality, emptiness, and loneliness. Basically, those three things sum up the problem of man. He is immoral; he is empty in himself; and he is lonely because of his inability to give himself to other people. And really, the basic problem of all of this is that he has cut himself off from God. And when he cut himself off from God, what happens is, he experiences that anomie -- that no-norm, no standards -- so no concept of right and no concept of wrong and no concept of self-worth then, because he doesn't know when he's good or when he's bad really, philosophically, anyway.And because he doesn't know God, he is anonymous, because he has nothing to hold onto. He has no invisible mans of support; he has no anchor. He has no being to give identity to his being. And, thirdly, because he does not know God, he suffers from a terrible selfish isolationism and loneliness. As one writer put it, he has cosmic loneliness. He sees nothing in the universe, to which he can lovingly attach himself. And when a man lives with this no norm, no standard kind of immorality, and he lives with the kind of anonymity that gives him emptiness and the kind of alienation that makes him lonely, he soon begins to see everybody against him. He begins to see everybody stealing his happiness. He begins to see all the people around him as people who infringe upon his potential. And very often, he winds up in negativism and despair and he retreats into a further selfishness and a further alienation. And then he can't get along with people. And people who can't get along with people create problems.
We saw a little bit of the 3rd chapter of James this morning. There is a word in the 4th chapter there that helps us, I think. It says, from where come wars and fightings among you; they come out of your lusts that war in your members; you lust and you don't have; you kill and you desire to have; you can't obtain; you fight and war; yet you have not because you ask not; you ask and receive not because you ask amiss..." -- or improperly that you may consume it on your lusts. You adulterers and adulteresses. Don't you know that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever, therefore, will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." And here he paints the picture of the man who is alienated from God, who therefore alienates himself from everybody else. Here is a man who is cut off from a sense of being and so he cuts himself off from everybody else -- a man whois immoral and a man who, because of his immorality, sets his own standards, and therefore alienates himself from other people who have different standards.
But the marvelous thing about being a Christian is that none of those three things needs to exist. Because when you become a Christian, you immediately have a standard, don't you? Immediately, when you become a believer, the Word of God becomes the standard. And secondly, you immediately have an identity - you don't have anonymity. You know who you are - you're a child of God. You're a son, you're an heir, you're a joint-heir. Jesus is not ashamed to call you brother and neither are a whole lot of other Christians all over the world. And that brings you to the third concept; you don't suffer from any alienation or isolation, because you're a part of a family. To become a Christian means you have standards. To become a Christian means you have a sense of being. You know why you exist -for the glory of God. You have a sense of connection. You're connected up with the divine ruler of the universe and you lose that sense of lonely alienation, because you have those who love you in the family.
So you see, all that I'm trying to show you is that man in our world can very much exist in an anti-social way. And when you become a Christian that ceases to be necessary. Christianity is not just personal; it isn't just a transformed life. It is a transformed life that transforms an environment in which that life lives. No longer do you feel alienated; no longer do you feel everybody's out to steal your potential. No longer do you feel that nobody understands you and that you have to fight for your own square inch. All of a sudden, you realize that there's a great God who cares and there's a great group of people who care and you're a part of something much bigger than yourself.
So we see, then, that there is in life -- the life of the new man - is alife lived out among men. And there's surely where it has its greatest impact. The new man has his greatest impact when he affects society.
Now this becomes Paul's discussion in chapter 3, verse 18. He has been talking about the new man, and now he talks about the new man in his relationships to other people. And he talks about a new wife in verse 18. What happens when a person becomes a Christian? What kind of wife does she become? A new husband in verse 19. A new kind of child in verse 20. A new kind of father in verse 21. A new kind of servant in verse 22. A new kind of master in chapter 4, verse 1. All of a sudden, his whole orientation to society is dramatically changed because Jesus Christ has entered his life. And many a husband has testified to the fact that when his wife became a believer, she changed. And many a wife has testified to the fact that when her husband became a believer, he changed. And many a mother who wondered about her child has been able to say, "When my child came to Jesus Christ, he changed." And many a child has been able to say, "Mien my parents met Jesus Christ, our home changed." And many an employer has been able to say, "You know that guy who works for me -- something happened in his life. I don't know what it was. It had something to do with religion. But boy, is he different on the job!" And many an employee has said, "Something happened to my boss... when he became a Christian." You see, it has tremendous social ramifications to become a believer, because the new man radiates the newness of that life into the world. Jesus put it this way; He said we are salt and light. We affect society. Paul said we are different. We are not citizens here; we are citizens of another kind of life, but he said we live as light in a dark world. We live holy lives in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation. Peter said we are models of human behavior. Now, this is our calling. A Christian is not just called to be an independent, solely existing individual, who cultivates between himself and God a relationship independent of anyone else -- not at all. If he has truly a relationship with God, it's going to have social ramifications. We don't need to suffer from the anonymity and the immorality and the loneliness and the emptiness of the world, because in Christ, all that's covered and we become social beings. We become relational people.
Now, that's a very important word today. Psychologists are throwing that word around, because man must establish relationships. And society realizes today that what we have in our world is a whole bunch of people who aren't related to anybody. They live in the same house -- they don't have any kind of relationship with the people who live there. They work at a job -they don't have any relation to the people who are there. Why? Because of this terrible lack of standards, because of this terrible feeling of anonymity, because of this threat that everybody's stealing from you and threatening your potential and this isolation and withdrawing. And the feeling that you have to defend your square inch or somebody bigger than you is going to take it away. Christianity cones along and says it doesn't have to be that way, because you can lose all of those anxieties in Christ. Christianity is relational.
And you know, we as Christians need to emphasize that today, because that's where the hurt of man is. I, a week or so ago, signed a contract with a publisher to write a book. In fact, the title of the book is interesting. It's going to be called "The Total Christian." There have been a lot of books about total this and total that and total everything else, and so we kinda think somebody ought to say something about the total Christian. So, anyway, we were talking about this and the publisher said to me, "You know, the one thing that we need to do in the book is make sure that it's relational." People are just reaching out to touch real people. And he said, "When you write it or when you work on it and put it together, try to put as much of your awn struggle and your own hurts and your own anxieties and your own life on the page, so people feel that this isn't somebody spouting out information, but this is somebody who's working through the same struggles as a Christian that the reader is." Because people are desperate for somebody to relate to. And I think that's right in a sense. We're looking for somebody to relate to.
But, when you think about it, Christianity's always been relational. Christians throughout all of the history of the Church have reached out and touched society. It isn't true Christianity that retreats to the monasteries; it isn't true Christianity that puts on funny clothes and hides for the rest of its life. It's true Christianity that moves into the world and rubs elbows and makes relationships and builds bridges to people, because that's the definition we find biblically. Christians have always done that. I want to run by a little history for you to show you this in a very general way. When you look back on the history of social reform in our culture western culture in Europe and here in America you find a great amount of that social reform is directly related to Christianity. For example, the l8th century had many of what was called II evangelical awakenings". One who was greatly instrumental in those was John Wesley. And John Wesley was not just a preacher of the gospel, but he was a man concerned about people and so he denounced the evils of his day. He particularly took his whacks at slavery and he urged in addition to that the reform of prisons, the education of the masses -and, incidentally, that became the cry of many preachers -- in the l8th century, that there had to be education. As a result of these, by the time you got to 1776, all the way through to about 1914, tremendous social reform took place in western culture. And much of it reaped right out of the evangelistic awakenings, with John Wesley and others. There was a great awakening in America in about 1725 to about 1775, and the result of it was the building of a number of American universities, which at that time were geared to educate the masses, but were built around religious themes. Christianity was at the core. The second great awakening led to the founding of a school system for the masses in Britain, as well as the founding of hundreds of colleges and schools in America. There was even a revival among Christians, I should say -- in Napoleon's day, and out of that revival in Napoleon's day cane a man by the name of Wilberforce and Wilberforce was one of the engineers of the abolition of the slave trade in Africa. And the result of his work, which was the result of the work of an evangelistic awakening, was that the slaves in the British Empire were freed in 1834 and in the United States, they were freed in 1863. There were certain isolated Christians who had a tremendous impact on society, such as Elizabeth Frye. Elizabeth Frye promoted successful prison reform. There was a man by the name of Fliedner, who was a Christian in Germany, who built hopes for ex-prisoners in order to help give them a halfway house to get them back into society. He built hospitals for the sick, spawned insane asylums, that is, homes for people who were insane, that had somecharacter to them and some quality to them, so that they weren't just holes or hovels where people were thrown until they died. He advocated orphanages for the children, and one of the people trained by Fliedner, trained in one of the schools, was a lady by the name of Florence Nightingale, who became the mother of modern nursing. There was the seventh earl of Shaftsbury in England, a non by the name of Anthony Ashley Cooper. He describes himself in one of his writings as an evangelical of the evangelicals. In modern terms, he'd be a fighting fundie. He promoted legislation to cut the hours of factory labor in half, to prohibit the use of womenworking incoal mines, and of children in factories and farm gangs, and he promoted legislation to transfer retarded people from prisons to places where they would be treated as patients. Agencies cam out of these great awakenings - these great Christian awakenings -- such as the YMCA, the Young Men's Christian Association, the Salvation Army, and many others. William Carey, a famous missionary to India, secured the abolition of widow burning, which was practiced in India, and child sacrifice. I always remember when I was a boy my dad telling about the natives in the land of India, who believed in the great god of the Ganges River, who would take one of their children and throw the baby when he was alive into the river and watch it drawn as a sacrifice to the god. William Carey went a long way to stop things like that. In Africa, many missionaries flooding the country, following in the lead of Livingston, discouraged polygamy, fought the slave trade, built schools, and built hospitals. J. C. Wenger says this: "Christianity burst into a corrupt world with a brilliantly new moral radiance. The moral level of society was dismal at the time of the New Testament, and sin prevailed in many form, and into this discouraged world came Christ and his Spirit transformed disciples, filled with holy joy, motivated by a love which the pagans could not grasp, and proclaiming good news, the message that God has provided a Savior. These Christians lived in tiny communities knit together in the power of the Holy Spirit, little colonies of heaven. They thought of themselves as pilgrims and their way to the celestial city, but they were very much concerned to manifest the love of Christ in all human relationships. These early Christians insisted on bringing all of life under the lordship of Christ." And Wenger says it is men and women of this kind of moral purity who build into society a strong sense of integrity. Life was cheap in the pre-Christian world -- murder, war, abortion, infant exposure -- people died in great numbers without anyone being very troubled in conscience. The early Christians brought a new concern into society at this very point. End quote. And I think he's right. Ever since Christianity arrived at the time that Christ was here and the discipleswere here, it has continually had an impact on society. It still does. Christians have cared about people. They have always cared about people. We saw that this morning in our definitions of love from I Corinthians that love is not a feeling; love is not an attitude; love is not an abstract; love is acting toward somebody. We see in Matthew 25, for example, where Jesus talks about offering a cup of cold water to somebody in "My name". We see in the book of James where, when somebody has a need in chapter 2,it's not enough to give them a little encouragement, it's only enough to meet theirneed. A very important thing! Christianity has always had great social implications.
You say, "Well, what does that have to do with Colossians 3?" Just this: certainly, we would have to agree that the most obvious, the most strategic, the very bottom line area, where Christianityshould have its social impact, would be in the single most significant social institution in the world, which is what? The home. And that's where Paul is in Colossians 3. He's saying it isn't just a new man. It's a new man who makes a new world. It's a new man who makes a new home. It's a new man who makes an impact on society. Nowhere should the social aspect of the new man be moreevident than it is in the home. A. T. Robertson says this, and I quote, "Real Christianity is both a doctrine and a life. Mere belief is dead without life as proof. Real spiritual life is impossible without vital contact with God and Christ, and our dealings with others become the final proof of our real connection with Christ." End quote. Christianity, he says, is dead unless it's relational. It's dead unless it has an impact with people. And the nitty-gritty -- the place where the rubber meets the road -- is the family ... the home, the basic unit of society. And I wonder whether Christianity can affect society at all if it can't affect its own homes. I wonder whether Christianity is ever going to do anything in a society when it can't do anything in the home. And when, on the other hand, it does something in the home, then it will have an impact on society. Paul hits this right here. And notice how briefly: wives, one verse) husbands, one verse; children, one verse; fathers, one verse; servants, a few more verses; masters, one verse. He's not giving a great long discussion, a great dissertation, on all the features of the home. He's just hitting the issues. There's a head-on confrontation of the main elements, that's going to make the home the kind of relational place it ought to be. Paul is brief; Paul is direct. In each case, he targets in on the sore spot.
Now, if you'll notice this -- you say, is this all the hare yes, you'll notice there are 3 relationships in a home. Now, notice. Now, remember here -- you're talking here about an ancient home, not a 20th century California home. This is the old style home. You have 3 relationships: wives and husbands, verses 18 & 19; children and parents, verses 20 & 21; servants and masters, the rest of the passage. These are the 3 relationships in the hare. In fact, hundreds of years before Christ, Aristotle said that. Aristotle said, "There are three great pairs of mutual relations in the home: husband/wife, parent/child, master/servant." Remember that in those days the homes had servants. Now, maybe you can't pull that into the 20th century. You might be able to pull it into the 20th century by imagining anybody who is at all employed in the home, or anyone who lives in the home who is not a regular family member. But, we Ill see that as we go
Paul wants to show us that Christianity is going to affect the home, that being a new man who puts off the old and puts on the new, that being a new man who, in verse 15, is ruled by the peace of Christ, verse 16, by the Word of Christ, and verse 17, by the name of Christ, that being this kind of man is going to have a tremendous and dramatic impact on the home. Now, as Paul goes through these verses, he really doesn't say anything new. He does not introduce any great new truths. He has the same old 2 principles. What are they? Authority and submission. He says these still maintain. Christianity doesn't add that; Christianity hasn't brought that into the world. That's been in the world for a long, long, tine. Hanes have always been built on authority and submission. That's always been God's plan. And man has always operated on that kind of basis. Somebody rules and somebody follows. So, we can't say that Christianity has introduced a new principle.
But let me show you what it has introduced. You might want to jot these down. First of all, Christianity has introduced a new presence. You say, what do you mean, John. Well, the new presence in the home is the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. And you'll notice at the end of verse 18: "... as it is fit in the Lord..."; the end of verse 20: "...for this is well pleasing to the Lord..."; verse 23: "Whatever you do, do it heartily, as to the Lord..."; verse 24, at the end: "...for you serve the Lord..."; verse 1, chapter 4: "...knowing that you also have a master in heaven..." Now, what is introduced into the home is not a new principle; it's the same old thing: authority on the part of the husband, submission on the part of the wife. But there's a new presence here. The family has, all of a sudden, a new power, because of a new presence. There's a new energy to realize this old principle. And so, it isn't anything new; it's something very old. But, there's a new presence, and, now follow me. And that new presence makes for a new power.Christ is there; His power is there to make the family what it ought to be. And, I think there's a third thing: a new purpose.Christianity introduces into the home. A new purpose. "Whatever you do..." -- verse 17 "...in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus." There's a new purpose. That's the verse that introduces this whole section. Whatever your home is and whatever you do in your home, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus. Do it all to His glory; do it all to His honor.
So there isn't a new principle, but there's a new presence, which means a new power, based on a new purpose and I'll tell you something else. Fourthly, there's a new pattern for the home. You say, what do you mean by that? Well, we needed a model to follow. So, in Ephesians, chapter 5, it says: "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ loved the church." The new pattern is Christ. You see, before Jesus came, they didn't have that model to follow. But, now we do. And so, there's a new presence, giving a new power, toward a new purpose, following a new pattern, to fulfill an old principle. And that is, God has intended authority and submission to exist in the ham. And while man struggles and struggles with that, it becomes possible in Jesus Christ.
Now, as we look at this home, we're going to get into the text right now, and we'll see how far we can get. There are 3 areas of relationships. We'll cover each one, and each me has 2 parts, so there will be a total of 6. You might say we'll call it "The New Man Makes a New Home. " We have a word to wives, a word to husbands, a word to children, a word to fathers, a word to servants, and a word to masters.
Now, we'll start with the wives. We're not picking on the wives. Just think, once you're done, you don't have to be discussed at all. Five more to go. A word to wives in verse 18. It's simple. "Wives, Now, that isn't too hard to figure out whether it applies to you or not. "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord." Now, that's such a simple statement; you would think it would be so very clear. It is absolutely mind-boggling what a problematic area that is today. I don't know how people can confuse that kind of statement. But it's incredible. There are people today who are denying that this needs to be true. There are books being written all the time by supposedly evangelical people, who deny this. Now, I'll just give you a few ways they deny it. Number one, some are saying that a wife doesn't necessarily have to be a woman. Oh, yes. A wife can be a man. You say, what's that? That's the "gay" church ... the Metropolitan Community Church of Los Angeles. And now they're all aver every place. The Metropolitan Community Church has branches in many, many areas. In fact, my dad called me the other day and told me an interesting thing. They have come to Eugene, Oregon, where he pastors. The Gay Church. They put a big ad in the paper. They wrote him a letter and said, "We're going to have an opening rally. Would you be our speaker?" And so, he wrote them back and told them in two pages why he wouldn't ... not until they repented of their sin, and he gave them the whole Biblical shot. Alright, so the end of it is this. So they ran a big ad in the paper, in the Eugene paper on the Eugene campus, in the Oregon university paper. And it said: "Gay Church has its beginning rally ...." etc. "Invited guest..." -- in big type -- "Jack MacArthur." Oh, he wasn't real thrilled about that. And he called the person up and said, "What's going on?" I forget the word. He uses big words. That was something anyway. Oh, I know what it was. That's complicity, he said. I don't know what it means but that's what he said it was. So, he was very mad. And he said, "I can't do that." They said, "Well, we're Christian people. to "Well, do you practice homosexuality'' he said. "Well, only if we're married." Oh, they perform marriages, he found out. And I said, "Oh, yeah. They do that in L.A. They marry one man to another. One's the husband and one's the wife." You see, it's all here. One submits and it's alright. So that's one point of attack - that wives aren't women anymore.
Another one is this -- that this is not really the Spirit speaking that this is just Paul waxing into his chauvinistic act... that Paul had this thing about women. And he just let it all out once in awhile. It just doesn't belong there; it's just an unfortunate mistake. Well, you know what a problem that is, when some people with their special interests start telling us which verses go out of the Bible. They sit in the seat of authority. They play the role of God and tell us what's in and what isn't.
Now, some others are a little more wily, and they are saving, "Well, actually what you have here is - Paul is actually commenting on Genesis 2, and we all know that Genesis 2 is not an inspired chapter." "Genesis 1 was inspired. Genesis 2 is a traditional rabbinical addition. it was added to the Old Testament. It is not inspired by God. And poor Paul, what does he know? He just picks up Genesis 2 as if it were inspired by God. And this is his comment on Genesis 2." Because, you see, Genesis 2 is where it says, "And her desire shall be to her husband..." and so forth. And that just eliminates Genesis 2. You want to know something? There's absolutely zero evidence for that. That's a lie. That isn't true.
And others are coming along, particularly two women who wrote a book, and they say, "Well, you see, you have to interpret that culturally. You see, in that culture, they didn't want women upsetting the society. And that society was an authority/submission society, but that's all cultural." "Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the church." Is that cultural too? I don't need to love my wife - that's cultural. That's not 20th century. That was then. Or maybe Christ only loved the church then... and doesn't love it now. You see, that doesn't make any sense at all. You know, thereare some pastors in our country who have omitted the words "submit" and "obey" from all their wedding ceremonies ... to acquiesce to this. Well, it sews so simple...."Wives, submit..." But I'll tell you something. All the efforts at integrating Women's Lib into Christianity still can't change Colossians 3:18. And if you have trouble with that, you canalways go to Romans 7:2. We don't just have one Scripture. Romans 7:2 don't look them up. Just listen and I'll read them to you. "The woman who hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband..." Well, that's pretty strong language. You say, "Well, that's two for you." Well, here's three -- I Corinthians 14:34: "Let your women keep silence in the churches. It's not permitted to them to speak. They are commanded to be under obedience as says the Law. If they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home. But it I s a shame for womento speak in the church - "There's more in I Timothy 2:11: "Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. I permit not a woman to teach nor to take authority over the man but be in silence. For Adam was first formed and then Eve and Adam was not deceived but the woman, being deceived, was in the transgression." Same idea. You have it again in Titus, chapter 2, verse 5: "The women are to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands." Why? Because it's the culture -- No! "...in order that the Word of God might not be blasphemed." I Peter, chapter 3, verse ... well; there are several verses, but verses 1 to 6. It says in verse6: "Sarah obeyed Abraham calling him Lord, and Sarah is honored." Now, you see, it's all over the place in the New Testament. It's the standard.
But I would notice that the emphasis here is not on the idea of obedience as an authoritative, overbearing, browbeating relationship, but it's submission. Obedience is reserved in this passage for children and servants. The word submission is reserved for wives. And it has a more cooperative concept tied to it. Now, notice that he says, "Wives, submit..." It isn't the idea that he's firing out the orders and you're obeying. It's the idea that you have a spirit of submissiveness. He says, "Submit to your own husbands." Now, you say, "Why does he say 'your own'? Does he think women are going to go around submitting to everybody's husband? No, I think the idea of "own" here is to emphasize that this is a personal, intimate, inward, vital relationship. He's saying to submit to your own husband. This is the man you own. This is yours. This is your possession. And somehow, that makes the submission all the more possible. You're not just submitting to some indifferent, detached authority. This is your own husband. You possess him; he possesses you. There's something very intimate, very personal there.
Now, we've talked about the kind of submission this means. It doesn't mean inferiority. It doesn't mean you're inferior to your husband. Not at all. Jesus wasn't inferior to God, but He submitted, didn't He? That isn't the idea. Women have great dignity in the New Testament. Paul emphasizes it in I and II Timothy and in Titus. Women have a strategic place in the ministry. We've been through that many times. Submission does not man inferiority. Another thing - submission is not absolute. It doesn't mean that you submit to everything all the time under possible situation. In Acts, chapter 5, Luke says you have some times to choose, as did Peter and John, when they said, "You choose whether we ought to obey God or men." Your husband may ask you to do something that you can't do in good conscience before God. So the submission is not absolute.
And then, I wouldadd, thirdly, that submission is in love. This is your own husband, assuming the one that you are intimately, inwardly, vitally in love with. There s something relational here. I think a
A Christian wife who loves her husband, who sees him as God's gift to her, who sees him as her own possession, will more easily regulate her conduct in harmony with this particular command. She's not going to join the Women's Lib. She's not going to parade her equality spiritually into equality maritally. Well, these are things you are well aware of. Notice what be says at the end of the verse. Verse 18: "...as it is fit in the Lord." The only justification for this is that this is the way God intended it. This is the way God invented it. This is the way God designed it. And people, if anything should be true that is true, it should be true in a Christian home. And this is true. "Wives, submit to your own husband." It's got to be true in a Christian home. Christianity has got to work there before it can work in the world.
Secondly, a word to husbands. And we're just hitting ground we've covered before. I'm going to read it to you as the Greek rendering states it. "You husbands keep on loving your wives and stop being bitter toward them." You husbands keep on continually loving your wives and stop being bitter toward them. Now, there are really two commands there. Number one, keep on loving your wives. Now, often, this isn't the case unfortunately. All the love is there before the marriage, and then, when the marriage happens, all the love seems to drain away. And what comes in its place is bitterness. And Paul knows this; the Holy Spirit knows this. You can replace love with bitterness. "Keep on loving your wives..." You loved them before you married them; you loved them when you married them; you loved them for awhile after you married them. Keep on loving your wives. And we've defined love, haven I t we? Don't sink to the level of assuming that love is an emotion again. Love is activity. It is the act of self-sacrifice. And we'll see more of that in our morning studies. But, don't let what was love turn into bitterness. Some have suggested that this word "bitter" should be translated "cross." Don't be cross toward them. Well, either word emphasizes a harshness of tamper. It emphasizes that attitude of resentment that leads to misery and often leads to divorce. I think it's "pikrino" that is the verb here and, if I remember correctly, it could be translated here as "exasperate" or "irritate." Don't irritate your wife. Don't exasperate your wife. Don't be cross against your wife. The word, incidentally, is only used three other times in the New Testament. And you'll find that the only times it is used, it is used in Revelation, chapter 8, once, and chapter 10, twice, and it has there the idea of bitterness...something very distasteful, something very unenjoyable. What Paul is really saying is, "Don't call her honey and act like vinegar." A husband is a leader and a lover. Howard Hendricks said, "A lot of frustrated sergeants are running around with biblical clubs in their hands shouting, 'I'm the head of my house,' and they're the only ones that are convinced." And the reason they are not, he says, is because there is no love. Keep on loving. Now, this is more than sexual love. It's that deep affection that sees your wife as a sister in the Lord, that sees your wife as a weaker vessel to be cared for, that sees your wife as your best friend that sees your wife as the most important human being in the world that sees your wife as your most critical permanent investment and life-long partner. Boy, if some men took care of their wives the way they take care of their money, it would be interesting. The husband is never cross; he's never bitter, never harsh. He only honors his wife and loves his wife. It's kinda sad when love goes out of a marriage; it should always be there. And it's something you have to work on and cultivate. I'm thinking of a verse in Genesis...if I can find it. I like this; here, I found it. Genesis 24:67...this is good..."And Isaac brought her into his mother, Sarah's, tent and took Rebecca and she became his wife." You say, "Yeah, is that all?" No, listen to this: "And he loved her." Isn't that good? And he loved her. He took her
to be his wife and after that, he actually went on to love her. The woman submits, and in that submission, there's nothing humiliating. There's nothing degrading, nothing inconsistent with intellectual moral and spiritual equality. It's simply necessary for domestic order in God's design and fulfills the woman's nature, as created by God. Such submission has its limits. If it violates her conscience, her conscience toward God, God's revealed Word, those are the limits. And, of course, the real limiter on what the woman is to do in submission is the love of the husband, because if he really loves her, he would never ask herto submit to something that would violate her conscience.
Now, this is the basic key to the home husband and wife. That's where it all starts. Now, you've got to cultivate this. My wife and I talk about this all the time. It isn't easy for us; it's no easier for us than it is for anybody else. People think, "Oh. Your home must be paradise." Paradise lost. We have our times; believe me, like everybody else. We have a happy home and there s love in our home and we work at it because you have to work at it. I mean, when was the last time you prayed with your wife? And didn't fall asleep while she was praying? When was the last time you took her out? Mien was the last time you bought each other a gift when it wasn't a special occasion. When was the last time you sacrificed something you really wanted for something he or she wanted but never said so? Now, you see, you've got to work on it. Christianity ought to affect the home. And to affect the home, it's going to have to be at that level husband and wife.
Let's go to the second section. The second dimension, which has two other words, relates to the children and the parents. The first is the word to "children." Now, some of you here are young people and you're saying, "Well, what is a child? How far do I go before I stop being a child and then I won't have to do this?" "Children," "ta tekna," is a very general word for child, an offspring. It can be any age. What it basically means is that it's a general word for anybody who is still under parental guidance. You stop being a child biblically in terns of this word, you stop being a child when you go out to establish your own independence and your own life. As long as you're in the home, as long as your parents are responsible for you, as long as you're under their leadership and control, you have one command. Look at it in verse 20: "Children, obey your parents in all things, for this is well pleasing unto the lord." Again, you have it in the Greek: "Keep on obeying." Thisisn't anything new. It's Ephesians 6:1; it's Exodus 20:12; it's Exodus 21:15 & 17; it's Leviticus 20:9; it's Proverbs 1:8, Proverbs 6:20, and who knows where else? This isan old thing in the Bible. It's nothing new. In Proverbs, chapter 30, it kinda emphasizes this concept of all things, you know, obey in all things. It says in Proverbs 30:11: "There is a generation that curses their father and does not bless their mother. There is a generation that are pure in their own eyes... "- you know, they have all the answers -"and yet they are not washed from their filthiness." "There is a generation, oh, how lofty are their eyes..." -- they think they're hot stuff. Now, he's either describing junior high school people or high school people; I'm not sure which. But anyway, "...and there is a generation whose teeth are like swords and their jaw teeth like knives to devour the poor from off the earth and the needy from among men." "They are like a horse leech that has two daughters, crying 'Give, give'..." A horse leech has two teeth that sink into the horse and suck the blood out. And he says there are children like that who are only trying to get what they can get. They are leeches. In verse 17, "It is the eye that mocks at his father and despises to obey his mother and that eye the ravens of the valley shall pick it out and the young eagles shall eat it." Now, God is very upset about that kind of attitude. That's pretty vivid language -- clawing out- their eyes and eating them. That's what God says about the kind of generation that is- disobedient. Listen to this. There is only one command in the entire Bible given to children or young people living in their home with their parents. That me command and the only command is to obey your parents in everything. That's it. You know, it's amazing to me how some young people will have such a difficult time defining their Christian life in all of its dimensions, when they don't even start at this very point. In Romans, chapter 1, when it characterizes the vices of paganism, one of them is disobedience to parents. In II Timothy, chapter 3, verse 2, when it catalogues the evils of the last days, it says one of these evils is disobedience to parents. And today, you know, the very word "authority" is anathema in some educational circles.' Children are supposed to be able to develop along their own paths. But it says, "all things." In all things wee are to obey.
Now, again I would add that this is limited. It is limited to that which doesn't violate God's standards. It is limited to that which doesn't step cross-grain to God's leading and God's will. I think at that point the young person or the child has to say what Peter said, "You judge whether we ought to obey God or men." I've had young people come to me and say, "My father wants me to do things for him in his business that are dishonest. What should I do?" Well, my answer is that you can't do them. In Luke 14:26, it says this: "If any man come to me and hate not his father and mother and wife and children and brother and sister and his own life, he can't be my disciple. Whoever does not bear his cross and come after me can't be my disciple." Jesus knew that sometimes a child or young person would come to Christ and it would have to be in violation of his parents. The authority again is limited to that which fits into the category of allowable by God.
Now, notice at the end of the verse, he simply says, "This is well pleasing..." Again, the same purpose. The reason to do this? Because this is the way God set it up. This is God's standard. This is God's pattern.
Now, that leads us down to verse 21, where he talks about fathers in the King James. Let me say a word about the word you can draw a line through the word "fathers" in your Bibles if you want and write "Parents" because that's that the word means. It is translated in Hebrews 11:23 as "parents" or should be translated that way because there it say-, "Moses was hid three months by his pateris." And there it's a plural. He didn't have more than one father, but it's used there to speak of parents. So, what you really have in verse 21 is: "Parents, provoke not.. or 11 ... stop provoking your children, lest they be discouraged." Stop - literally -- irritating your children, that they may not lose heart. Stop nagging your kids. This refers to the irritation that comes by the emotional explosion on the part of parents. Now, I was thinking about this and looking back on some of the things that we taught you before,... How can a parent really irritate his child? It says, "Don't irritate your children." Now, how can you irritate them? Let me give you some ways. Here's a list of ways. If you really want to irritate your children, do this: 1. Overprotection. I hear the "Amen" corner over here really going at it. A couple of overprotected people over here. Overprotection. No trust. All rules. All deprivation. You never ever allow them any liberty. You draw the lines so narrow and the boxes are so closed that they soon feel that you do not believe in them. You do not trust in them. No matter what they do to earn that trust, they never experience that trust. Consequently, they give up and say, "What's the difference anyway?" Then you've got that seething rebellion. You can really irritate your children by overprotecting them. Give them a sense of trust. You don't have to cover every single detail of every single thing they've ever done. well, what did you do? What did you do after that? Well, then where did you go? Well, when you got back from there, where did you go? Why did you go over there? let them live. You know, when they're born, they're born with an umbilical cord and they're connected. And from then on, their whole life, you're just letting it out. And it ought to sometime be cut and the kid ought to be so far out that he doesn't even know he's not connected anymore, it's just so natural.
2. Favoritism. The second way you can really irritate your children is by favoritism. Make sure you always compare them with the other kids in the family who do better than they do. Why can't you be Like Albert? He always does his homework. It's very irritating for a child to be less than an individual. It's very irritating for the child to be a lemon on the assembly line. Favoritism. Favoritism means you constantly compare the child with the other child.
3. Depreciating his worth. A third way you can irritate your child is by depreciating his worth. One good way to really depreciate his worth is whenever you have company, have him eat in the kitchen. That'll really let him know that he just really isn't worth having around anything important. or else, when he comes in and has something to say, you say, "Hush up and go back an the den. Go to your roan." And then you get the autistic kind of child who finally tries to communicate and gives up and so then he can't communicate at all and he won't. And then you get that ultimate kind of autistic person who doesn't say anything anytime, because he never did get listened to when he tried to. We were talking about this with Howard Hendricks when we were back at the conference last weekend, you know. And he was saying, "Look -- if you come to my house for dinner, you've got to get ready. They're all going to be there, staring you right in the eye. The whole bunch. When we have Company, the kids are all there, looking right dawn your throat." Because they're part of our family. They have every right to be a part. Don't depreciate their worth. Don't tell them to shut up and go to bed. There are boundaries -- yes.
4. Discouragement. A fourth way youcan irritate your child is by discouragement. Don It ever -reward him for anything. Make sure that he never feels like he's succeeded. I know a girl that killed herself for that reason, because no matter what she did, it was never enough. No matter what her grades were, it was never enough. No matter how well she did, it was never enough, let's face it. A parent who feels that way about a child is trying to get a child to he something theparent never was. That's not fair. And this girl couldn't handle it, so she killed herself. That's sad. Discouragement -- no rewards, no honors.
5. No affection demonstrated. Another good way to irritate your child is never demonstrate any affection for him. Don't ever go out of your way to love him or hug him or kiss him or pick him up...squeeze her or be gentle or thoughtful in a physically affectionate way. Very, very discouraging. So if you want to discourage your child, don't reward your child, don't honor your child, and never demonstrate any love or affection. So the child just begins to feel totally alienated, totally unacceptable, can't do anything right, isn't worthy of your love, isn't worthy of your affection -- he gets very, very discouraged.'
6. Not providing his needs. Another thing - this is kind of practical. You can irritate your child by not providing his needs. You know what a child's needs are? Believe it or not, in our society, do you know what a child needs? A room. Yes, he does. He needs a room, a little privacy. That would be good. Now, you can overcome that, maybe your economics don't make it possible for every single child to have his own domain, but provide some place for him. Your child needs a place to play and if it can't be at your place, then take him to the park, because he or she needs a place to play. Another thing is clean clothes. That's a good thing to provide your children. And when they get a little older, somewhere to study - you know, I think that one of the reasons that some children never do well in school is because they don't know where to land when they some home. They sit down at a table and you say, "What are you doing in here with that homework?" "Get out of here and go to your room." And they go to their roan and they get backaches from sitting five minutes on their bed, because there's no where to sit. Provide some place for them to study. Another thing is to give them something that belongs to them -- whatever itis. Another thing is to feed them good meals. Let them know that you've prepared something special just for them. These little practical things, where a child begins to know that you are concerned about him and about her as a person.
7. Lack of standards. On the other hand, you can irritate a child by a lack of standards. You know, there are children and young people, and when I use the word child, I mean anybody who is still in the home, but you can really irritate your young people by not giving them any rules. Because then they are totally left on their own and they can't handle that kind of liberty and they are constantly getting into problems that they really can't cope with. Cross somelines; make somefences.
8. Criticism. Another way to irritate your children is by criticism. A well-known doctor, Dr. (Haim Geno) says this: "The child who lives with criticism does not learn responsibility. He learns only to condemn himself and find fault with others. He learns to doubt his own judgment, disparage his own ability, distrust everybody. Above all, he learns to live with continual expectation of impending doom." End quote. Now that is no way to live. Criticism. Don't irritate your child with criticism. Create a positive environment, an uplifting, up building one.
9. Neglect. And then I think another way to irritate a child is by neglect. You know what a classic illustration of that is? Absalom. Absalom was a tragic young man, who tried to kill his own father, David. And Absalom is a classic illustration of a son whowas neglected by a father. You can really irritate your child by indifference, neglect. Play with your children.
10. Over-discipline. And then, of course, and this is the last one I'll mention, you can really irritate your child by over-discipline. This is where your discipline is hurtful, you know, when you haul off and really hurt them. Or it can be when you just scream at them all the time, or holler at them or yell at them, or shut them in their rooms. Or you're actually some people even discipline their children in a show of their superior strength, if you can believe it. You talk about battered children, or whatever. But the idea is that of over-disciplining children. You can do it by yelling and screaming at them for every single thing they do. You know, they can knock -- this happens all the tine -- bang! Over goes the milk at the table. You stupid... Or you can say, "Well, here we go again. Laugh about it. You can over-discipline them. I man, he didn't do it on purpose. You can over-discipline them by actually using your brute strength to show your superior power over your child. I've often thought that we say things to our children we'd never say to anybody else, don't we? Don't ever discipline them in anger.
Well, those are just some practical things to help you see that you don't want to irritate your children. Now, he comes back with verses 22 to 25, and I'm not going to spend very much time on them, becausewe've covered these thoughts recently in our study on-God's plan for labor. But this is category 3. The homes in those days had servants, and they needed to know how they should be relating to those servants. The master and the servant idea. Just let me go by these quickly. Incidentally, your servants are not employees. Servants were slaves. They were the actual property of their masters, but the principles that apply to them certainly apply to employee/employer relationships throughout history. Verse 22: "Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh, not with eye service as men pleasers, but in singleness of heart fearing God." Now's here is a home where you have some slaves. Now, maybe you don't have that in your home -- I'm not sure you don't. Maybe you have a maid; maybe you have somebody who does your garden; maybe you have people who come and go, fixing things, doing things. Maybe you want to look at this from the standpoint of your job or your employee/employer relationships. Christianity has some principles on which thisthing is to function. And it's very simple: if you are an employee, you are to obey everything. Notice -- not with eye service, that is, not just when the boss is looking, as if you were to please him. But with a single heart -really, you're pleasing God. The Greeks and the Romans -- there were just slaves everywhere. This was a tremendously important thing in the home, that the slaves realized that they were to be submissive, even if they were Christians. They were to be submissive. According to the flesh, their masters ruled them. Not that they were ruled by them spiritually. But in a fleshly relationship, not a superior relationship intellectually, or spiritually, or morally, or any other way, but just the flesh -- they were in a position to obey. And they were to obey, verse 23 says, --whatever they did, they were to do heartily as to the lord and not to men. Totally committed to serve as if the master were the lord Himself. Enthusiastically "working from the soul," the literal Greek says.
Now, then he gives two reasons: negative and positive. The first is positive: "knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance, for ye serve the lord Christ." Now, listen. The Lord is going to pay you back. Robert G. Lee's favorite sermon, "Pay Day Some Day." You may not be getting your due now. You may be underpaid and overworked, but some day God is going to equalize. Verse 24: "The Lord will give you the reward of the inheritance, because it's Him that you serve." As an employee on the job, as a servant in the home, whatever it is, wherever it is, for whomever you'reworking, you are really working for the Lord. You are serving the Lord. And, whatever inequities there are, don't let them condition your behavior. You serve with a full heart; you serve whole-heartedly; you serve all-out; you serve with total commitment, because the Lord is the One you're really serving and the Lord will pay you back.
And then, he says there's a negative reason in verse 25: "And he that doesn't do this shall receive for the wrong which he has done and God will not respect persons." If the slaves fails to heed the admonitions, he'll be punished. The Lord will discipline. And God is impartial. Don't think because you're a Christian or because you know the Lord in a unique way that you have any special favors. The Christian slave is not to presume on his Christianity as a justification for disobedience s a slave. And when the apostle Paul was writing this letter to the Colossians, no doubt he had in mind the case of Philemon, the slave -whom he sent back and asked Philemon to receive with love. If the slave has wronged, the slave has to pay for the wrong. He's not exonerated because he's a Christian.
So you see the two sides of that: servants obey. Obey as if it were the Lord. Whatever you do, do it with your whole heart. A positive reason: you'll be rewarded by the Lord whom you're really serving. A negative reason: if you don't, there will be a chastening.
And then lastly, a word to the masters. "You give your servants that which is just and fair, knowing that you also have a master in heaven." In other words, do unto others as you would have the Lord do unto you. Treat them fairly, as God, you would hope, would treat you. Now, in this simple thing -and I've just run it by. We haven't gone into any great depth. But let me just say this: when you add this whole chapter together, what you have is the new man making a new home. In the world of the New Testament, a wife with this attitude, a husband with this attitude, children with this attitude, parents with this attitude, slaves with this attitude, and masters with this attitude, would absolutely be a dramatic, shocking reality in a society. And it still should be true in a society today where homes are falling apart, where marriage is a joke, where people in our communities can't believe that there's anybody who's happily married, or that there's any home with peace, or that there's any home with love and fun and unity and all of these things the Bible talks about. There ought to be some that we can lay out there and say "Look here. Here's one." If Christianity is to affect our world, it will affect the world from the vantage point that it affects the home. And it all goes back to the same thing. Verse 1 of chapter 3: if you're risen with Christ, live it. Put off the old man; put on thenew man. Verse 15: let the peace of Christ rule. Verse 16: let the Word of Christ dwell in you. Verse 17: let the name of Christ guide you. And the result is going to be that you're not only going to be a new man, but a new wife, and a new husband, and a new child, and a new parent, and a new slave, and a new master. And I really believe that if homes can become what God wants them to be, they can become the catalyst to change a messed-up world. And Christianity will continue to go on in history as the agency that has brought about great social reform.
What are we going to do in America? We had a discussion on Tuesday with our entire staff. What are we going to do about divorce? How are we going to deal with the mass of divorced people? How are we going to deal with single parents? How are we going to deal with children who don't have a father? What are we- going to do in the future? Is it going to get better? No, it's going to get worse. I'll tell you one thing we'd better do ... if we're going to have anything to say about this, we'd better get our homes together, don't you think? And if we can get our homes together and they can become a testimony to the world, maybe we can affect this world before it's so far gone that we've lost it all together.
Well, Father, thank You for our time tonight. It's just practical things we've shared and just reminders of things we should know. I'm thankful so thankful -- for the patience of the people who come week by week and are willing to sit and share and hear and learn and open their hearts to what Your Spirit says. Father, there's a great courage in that. There's a great courage when people will come and say, "Preach to me. Tell me what I need to be." And they'll come back week after week and hear it. Father, there's a great openness in that and I thank You for that spirit in these people. I thank You that You've given us answers that can make a difference. Father, we thank You tonight for our good time-. Thank You for again reminding us of what we really know already, but just hitting us with it again. Thank You for helping me to think these things through. May they linger in our hearts, that our homes might become what You would have them to be, that we might be new people who make new homes that can have an impact to nuke a new world. We can't give up, Father. We have to try. We have to continue to preach, with our living and our speaking, that Jesus can be exalted. We pray in His wonderful name, trusting that You'll bring those that You want to come into the counseling roan, and the rest of us, that we shall go, charged up to minister for You, first in our home and then in our world. In Christ's name, Amen.
This article is also available and sold as a booklet.
This sermon series includes the following messages:
Please contact the publisher to obtain copies of this resource.Publisher Information


text:
This Weekend in Sports — It's All About Major League Baseball
It's a rather light schedule on the upcoming sports calendar, with Major League Baseball dominating the offerings. Here's what to watch this weekend:
Friday, July 12
Cincinnati Reds at Atlanta Braves
Turner Field, Atlanta; 7:30 p.m. (ET) on Fox Sports South, Fox Sports Ohio
The Cincinnati Reds (51-40) travel to Atlanta to face the National League East-leading Braves (52-39). The Reds will send veteran hurler Bronson Arroyo (7-7, 3.55) to the mound to stifle Braves hitters like Freddie Freeman and Justin Upton. Atlanta will start Kris Medlen (6-8, 3.45) against a Cincinnati lineup anchored by Joey Votto and Jay Bruce.
Saturday, July 13
2013 Tour de France — 14th Stage
France; 8 a.m. (ET) on NBC Sports Network
The world's best cyclists will complete the 14th Stage of the 2013 Tour de France by traversing 191 kilometers from Saint-Pourçain-sur-Sioule to Lyon. Christopher Froome wore the leader's yellow jersey as of Thursday morning, and he was the favorite to win the title. The tour ends in Paris on Sunday, July 21.
Gold Cup Soccer — U.S. vs. Cuba
Rio Tinto Stadium, Sandy, Utah; 3:30 p.m. on Fox
The U.S. Men's National Soccer Team continues Gold Cup play by facing Cuba in Utah. Chris Wondolowski and Landon Donovan were exceptional for the Americans during Tuesday's 6-1 win over Belize. Cuba lost to Costa Rica, 3-0, and haven't won a Gold Cup match since a 2-0 victory over Canada in 2003.
Texas Rangers at Detroit Tigers
Comerica Park, Detroit; 7:15 p.m. (ET) on Fox
Perennial American League powers clash, as the Texas Rangers (53-38) head north to face the American League Central-leading Detroit Tigers (50-40). The Rangers will start Derek Holland (7-4, 3.19) against a dangerous Detroit lineup that features Miguel Cabrera and Prince Fielder. The Tigers will send Max Scherzer (13-0, 3.06) to the mound in search of his 14th straight win to start the season.
Sunday, July 14
Camping World RV Sales 301
New Hampshire Motor Speedway, Loudon, NH; 1:15 p.m. (ET) on TNT
After winning last week's Coke Zero 400, Jimmie Johnson extended his lead in the 2013 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series. Johnson is 49 points ahead of second-place Clint Bowyer and 71 points in front of third-place Carl Edwards as the circuit heads to New England this Sunday.
St. Louis Cardinals at Chicago Cubs
Wrigley Field, Chicago; 8:05 p.m. (ET) on ESPN
The National League Central-leading St. Louis Cardinals (55-34) face the Chicago Cubs (40-49) in the last game before the All-Star break. The Cardinals will hand the ball to Adam Wainwright (12-5, 2.30), while the Cubs send NL All-Star Travis Wood (6-6, 2.69) out to tame the St. Louis lineup.


text:
News from the world of Maths
January 21, 2015
The London Mathematical Society starts its 150th anniversary year with a bang.
January 8, 2015
Our image of the week may look like a bird in flight, but it's actually a subset of the plane defined by a mathematical formula.
January 2, 2015
Charlie Stripp, Chief Executive of Mathematics in Education and Industry (MEI), has been awarded an MBE.
December 24, 2014
Happy Christmas! Here's the perfect toy to help you celebrate.
December 23, 2014
Win the race for those final christmas gifts!
December 21, 2014
"A mathematician, like a painter or poet, is a maker of patterns."
December 19, 2014
Door 19 conceals something wriggly...
December 19, 2014
The self-taught Indian genius would have turned 127 this month.


text:
Pep band defeated again
A student columnist laments the perpetual exile of UVA's irreverent Pep Band the same day that media report that the lead donor for the recent Scott Stadium renovation has pledged an eight-figure sum to its rival.
4 comments
Humor is subjective, but my problem with the Pep Band was always that it never appeared they ever bothered to practice or rehearse. Their musicianship as an ensemble was embarrassing - to the University as a whole and to the musicians themselves. They didn't give a hoot what they actually sounded like, and when push comes to shove "what you sound like" is or should be of paramount importance to any entity that calls itself a "band."
Has anyone ever surveyed students on this subject? In my time at UVa (pretty recent), I thought the Pep Band was an embarrassment. I feel like most students shared that view. Does anyone care about the Pep Band other than the members of the Pep Band?
Yeah, but the Pep Band SUCKED. It was truly embarrassing to be a UVa fan at the Continental Tire Bowl in Charlotte. The "humor" was sophomoric at best and in VERY poor taste.
More evidence of the Sports/Industrial complex -- alive and well at THE UNIVERSITY