text:
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Lawsuit: Boston PD's 'Gang Database' Says People Who Wear Nikes And Have Been Beat Up By Gang Members Are 'Gang Associates'
- State Cops Accidentally Out Their Surveillance Of Anti-Police Groups With Browser Screenshot
- Louisiana Police Appear To Be Using A Hoax Antifa List Created By 8Chan To Open Criminal Investigations
- Jury Balks At Trademark Claim Against Ex-Member Of Rock Group Boston
- After Ripping Off Cities, States For Years, Verizon Makes Some Familiar Broadband Promises To Boston
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 5:39pmComplete idiots. The Boston police are complete idiots.
I fly in and out of Logan all the time. Yesterday I unpacked my laptop bag and realized that I've been carrying a razor sharp, folding knife through Logan security for the last 6 months. I've cleared security there at least 12 times in that time frame, they've never found it.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 7:59pm
Re:Even though you replied Anonymous, your statement says you are a white Caucasian man. You lucky bastard, just make sure u don't visit Iraq anytime soon :)
Steve Forcum, 21 Sep 2007 @ 5:57pm
Do a little more researchThe problem with the light brites is that the full story never came out.
The devices which caused the panic were not up for weeks. They were placed the night prior.
There was a LEGITIMATE bomb threat at one of the hospitals BEFORE the light boards were called in. A device which looked like a pipe bomb was found and security had observed what turned out to be a fired employee saying "Someone's going to pay today" when leaving the building. The light board hoax came in while they were investigating THAT. Thus they had to take EVERYTHING seriously that day.
With regards to this idiot today...she walked into an Airport, post 9-11 with a circuit board and wiring protruding from her shirt. She was holding a ball of what turned out to be playdough.
When she was at the ticket counter asking about a flight into Boston from Oakland, the airline employee observed the object in her shirt. When she asked the idiot about it, the girl walked away not responding to the question.
What were the police supposed to do? And that wasn't Boston PD, it was State Police who took her down. She's lucky she wasn't shot.
Re: Do a little more researchWhat were the police supposed to do? And that wasn't Boston PD, it was State Police who took her down. She's lucky she wasn't shot.
As I said, they were correct to check it out and figure out what the device was.
They were *wrong* to then say it was a hoax device. Once they knew it was a simple device for lighting up a shirt, they should have been done with it. There's nothing wrong with them reacting cautiously and investigating what the device is. However, once they know it's not a bomb, to then call it a hoax device is ridiculous.
Why is it so difficult to understand this?
dorpus, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:40pm
Re: Re: Do a little more researchUh, what was the intention behind this device? It was clearly designed to look like a bomb. Then by definition, it was a hoax device.
Mike, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:08pm
Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchuh, no it looks like a visual EQ, and its an MIT project... there are dozens of students wearing variations of them this week... regardless its just stupid fearmongering to make such a huge scene when the LOGICAL move would have been to whisk her aside once they realised what had happened and NOT to tell the media and I quote "She's lucky we didn't shoot her" which will be the line repeated over again at the court hearing you can be sure.
Streaker, 22 Sep 2007 @ 8:40pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchYou just need to accept the fact that everyone isn't an expert at determining what's a bomb and what isn't. They obviously don't possess the genius skills that you would manifest in such a situation.
She IS lucky they didn't shoot her. Angels protect idiots, I suppose.
Mr Obvious Man, 25 Sep 2007 @ 9:55am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do a little more research?
Mr Obvious Man, 25 Sep 2007 @ 10:01am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do a little more research?
Do a little more research? you DO mean the DHS yes?
Perhaps DHS should HIRE some people CAPABLE of looking at a device and DETERMINING what it is?
Any 19 year old computer geek/Make Website Fan should be able to handle this.
That said, I don't think that she should have been allowed to wander around frighting DHS employees, (I'm pretty sure the general public would have known better than to freak out.) but a quiet "You cant wear that in here, we are freaking out" & an escort from the airport would have been the correct response.
Skeptical, 23 Sep 2007 @ 10:02am
Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchTake a closer look. A plastic circuit board; LEDs in the shape of a star; a 9 volt battery. Looks like a bomb? Hardly.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:52pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchHere's the thing: airport security doesn't have time to "take a closer look." They have to go on sight, from a distance, and react FAST, and sometimes even that's not enough.
A cursory glance, which is all airport employees had, and that device looks suspicious at the absolute least.
mkam, 24 Sep 2007 @ 4:34am
Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchI could not agree with dorpus more. I never thought I would every say that.
Uh, what was the intention behind this device? It was clearly designed to look like a bomb. Then by definition, it was a hoax device.
It was definitely supposed to resemble a plastic explosive, and therefor was a 'hoax' device by definition.
Mike, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:13pm
Re: Do a little more researchuh, I have footage of one going up on a bridge I filmed MYSELF 8 days before the fiasco, and within 45minutes of the police stating they had found "suspicious devices" we called the police and told them what they were, we even tried to send them to the youtube clip we had uploaded the week before. The lady we spoke to took all of the info including the URL, and we called AGAIN 30min later when we heard nothing about it on the news. You my friend are reading the POLICE version of events which is a tad twisted because they look incredibly foolish in the REAL timeline. They actually DETONATED a device AFTER they were found to be nothing more than batteries and LED's just because the equipment was on scene and the techs wanted to use it.
dorpus, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:19pm
Re: Re: Do a little more researchKeep going Mike, you're doing a fine job of incriminating yourself.
Mike, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:34pm
Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchlol incriminating myself for what? reasoned thinking? I would welcome an attempt by the city of Boston to bring me to trial, the end result of that being taking some taxpayer dollars for my pocket as they don't have a leg to stand on. Better in my pocket than in the hands of the inept municipal government that spent +4mil on a bunch of light up signs.
dorpus, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:41pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do a little more researchSo which cities will you be planting your LED artwork in next?
Steve Forcum, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:00pm
One more thing about the light brites...The long haired idiot who put them up supposedly observed and video taped the police dealing with one of his "marketing materials". He did nothing. He didn't tell the police what the devices were.
Instead he went home, sent an email to his friends asking them to stay quiet about the things.
But the Police are the idiots.
Johnny Monoxide, 23 Sep 2007 @ 4:22pm
Re: One more thing about the light brites...Yes, the police are idiots. Bottom line 80% of law enforcement is scum.
Mike, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:00pm
The airport person was an IDIOTI dont have any sympathy for that girl at the airport.
She had things printed on her shirt about it, lights blinking on a board around her neck, and had what looked like playdough in her hands.
She's lucky they didnt shoot first and ask questions later.
Has no concept of bad taste....
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:43pm
Re: The airport person was an IDIOTOH MY GOSH! She was wearing a T-shirt with writing on it too! Get a rope!
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:12pmLike people have said, common sense dictates that you shouldn't do things like this at airports. Not knowing what the device was, what other choice did they have if she wasn't willing to answer questions about it?
dorpus, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:23pm
I wonderObvious troll from Manick aside, will MIT kick her out? I can just hear the conversations on the phone getting, chewed out by her parents.
Looks like the girl gained weight since her blog pic was taken. My guess is she was getting her ass kicked in her sophomore courses, plus whatever family troubles she had at age 20, going out with some trashy guy from Oakland, ....
Thales, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:42pm
Then what was it?What was the purpose of it, why would she do it? It was supposedly art... So it is artful to go into the airport where two of the hijacked planes originated? The classes referenced on the sweater was an electrical engineering and computer science class, not an art class. She -WANTED- them to think she had a bomb, hence the use of play-doh in imitation of plastic explosives. It sounds to me like she was looking for trouble and got it.
Having been deployed twice, and having seen what sorts of crazy UXOs and IEDs terrorists are capable of conjuring I would have shot her on the spot. I don't agree with the response to the Adult Swim ATHF signs, but they should have dropped her to the ground and zip-tied her.
I would say that hoax device is an accurate description of what she was carrying. Regardless of whether or not it was art, the sweater was meant to deceive people into believing it was a bomb and that the play-doh was plastic-explosive.
Furthermore, I don't see how your interpretation of what a hoax device is any more correct than that of the arresting officers. I also fail to see how you are an expert in explosives or even know what your typical IED would look like.
Re: Then what was it?She -WANTED- them to think she had a bomb, hence the use of play-doh in imitation of plastic explosives. It sounds to me like she was looking for trouble and got it.
The story notes that she *often* wore this sweatshirt. She didn't just decide to put it together to wear it to the airport and trick security.
dorpus, 21 Sep 2007 @ 7:26pm
Re: Re: Then what was it?So Mike, if I reported this blog to the FBI as a "pro-terrorist blog", would you agree it is just "art" too? If I gave them a detailed history of your anti-FBI posts, and men in blue windbreakers show up at your door next week, would it be "art" also?
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:43pmNot sure that I agree with the police being out of line for charging her. It is stupid to wear stuff like this to the airport. I don't know if she was going for a bomb look (for an MIT student, I am sure they could have come up with something more bomb looking than that). However, to call it art is a bit ridiculous as well.
She said she was there to pick a friend up. Did they follow up on that? Was the friend story legit, or was she simply using that as an excuse after realizing what she had done wasn't such a good idea?
MikeB, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:50pmWhen stupid people do stupid things, you correct them. She obviously isn't stupid, simply lacking any common sense as all. A serious smacking is deserving here.
That said, I see a great opportunity for someone selling shirts saying "NOT a HOAX" in flashing lights. I'd buy one. ...Just be careful where you wear them... ;-)
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:55pm
Seen this item?Would this be confused as a hoax device by the police?
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 6:11am
Re: Seen this item?If you wear this in any US airport, you could be and maybe should be, shot on site.
tim stevens, 21 Sep 2007 @ 6:56pm
Boston's "finest" - a bunch of boobs"Hoax device?" WTF is that?
Let's just admit that the Boston PD don't collectively possess enough gray matter to differentiate between "problem" and "no-problem" situations. So rather than admit it, they simply demonstrate their stupidity again and again and again...
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:22pm
Re: Boston'sWhat do you expect? The BPD has more PRESSING issues on their plate:
* The detectives union is complaining that the State Police is taking over MBTA-related homicides. Earlier this year, the same union complained that the homicide unit is being overworked with too many cases per person.
* The State Police (the department involved in this matter) is still having trouble with their academy cadets and "unauthorized" hazing.
Excuse my terminology, but what do you expect from a bunch of mick cops? Thanks to the way-lefties, freedom of *anything* for the majority is all but extinct (think of the Dodo bird and you will get the picture).
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 7:31pmThey're idiots because the someone who is actually going to blow up an airport doesn't wear blinking lights on their shirt.
You want to detect suicide bombers, ask the Israelis how to do it, they're good at it. Not many flashing billboards on real terrorists clothing.
dorpus, 21 Sep 2007 @ 7:33pm
Re:So? If some messed up 20 year old girl wanted attention, she may well want to wear a real bomb that "looks" fake, with flashing lights on it.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:25pm
Re: Re:So? If some messed up 20 year old girl wanted attention, she may well want to wear a real bomb that "looks" fake, with flashing lights on it.
OR, she might not! Therefore, if she ISN'T wearing flashing lights it could mean that she really has a bomb!
john duncan yoyo, 22 Sep 2007 @ 6:23am
Re: Re: Re:Which leads to any one not wearing flashing lights is wearing a bomb. It should be a much more colorful world with lots of epileptics to step over on the ground.
The Boston Police appear to need some Paxil.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 7:54pmWe've taught the terrorists that if you send in an obvious decoy that the Mass state police will fall for a feint.
The Mass state police LOVE their MP-5's and will take them out any time they can.
Joe, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:04pm
hoax deviceIn Massachusetts, the term "hoax device" has a legal definition. And it took literally 3 minutes of research to find it. Personally, I like to look into things like this BEFORE I post.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the term "hoax device" shall mean any device that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such device is an infernal machine. For the purposes of this section, the term "infernal machine" shall mean any device for endangering life or doing unusual damage to property, or both, by fire or explosion, whether or not contrived to ignite or explode automatically. For the purposes of this section, the words "hoax substance" shall mean any substance that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such substance is a harmful chemical or biological agent, a poison, a harmful radioactive substance or any other substance for causing serious bodily injury, endangering life or doing unusual damage to property, or both.
Um yeah...it's a hoax device. To quote Mike, "Why is it so difficult to understand this?"
Mike, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:31pm
Re: hoax devicelol that is the "definition" as applied by Boston, I think the courts decide whether its a hoax device actually, you remember due process? that ol thing that used to be part of American law?
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:29pm
Re: Re: hoax deviceDon't forget: The decision to make a law is ultimately up to the people (through their representatives).
Apparently, Massachusetts' court system did not get that memo when it came to the decision on same-sex marriage. Where was the people's choice in that?
And, the people never got a chance to make their own ruling on this matter; the ballot question was squashed in the state congress due to some stupid level of legislative insanity.
I've said it once before and I'll say it again: THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WORK!!!!!!
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:59pm
Re: hoax device
Um yeah...it's a hoax device.No, reread what you posted. It says "reasonably" to believe. It doesn't say anything about idiots with overactive imaginations. Sounds like they have no case to me.
Clueby4, 21 Sep 2007 @ 8:27pm
FYIDorpus = apologist
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:09pm"would cause a person reasonably to believe that such device is an infernal machine"
The only thing that would cause a person to believe what she was wearing (or even more so in the aqua swim case) is going to too many Die Hard Movies.
The cops should stop going to adventure movies and read this article. http://publicsafety.com/article/article.jsp?id=1916&siteSection=20
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 10:13pm
The cops should stop going to adventure movies and read this article.That article lists signs of a suicide bomber. Two of them basically are:
1. Someone standing out from the crowd.
2. Someone blending in with the crowd.
Damn, sounds like just about everyone!
Thales, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:15pm
Any real life experience?Have any of you actually seen an IED, like actually handled one or had to -search- for one? I've seen IEDs rigged behind Saddam posters, I've seen acid-filled lightbulbs serve as IEDs... they don't adhere to any particular to form, so you can't blame them for taking precautions. Think about it, they are continually put in a situation where they have to make judgment calls in order to protect themselves and those around them. It doesn't matter what the intent was behind it, it doesn't matter if she thought it was harmless or that the Boston PD is stupid... what matters is she went into an airport that was the site of two plane hijackings with something that could have BEEN an IED and was detained as a result. As for the stupid, ignorant defense "terrorists wouldn't do something so obvious" or "they don't look like she did"; IEDs look like anything and everything, they are made and strategically placed to do the most damage. If you aren't suspecting something obvious then you might overlook it, and vice versa, this applies to both the terroristic individual and the weapon they choose to employ. I say they rightfully erred on the side of caution and things turned out as they should... although if they had trashed the girl it would have been far more fitting.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 10:28pm
Re: Any real life experience?
IEDs... they don't adhere to any particular to formNow try to remember that.
...she went into an airport that was the site of two plane hijackings with something that could have BEEN an IED and was detained as a result.Remember, almost anything can be an IED. So then why isn't EVERYONE detained? Anyone COULD be carrying an IED. Especially in a country at war. Right?
I get the feeling that anyone who questions authority would be in Gitmo if you had your way.
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 10:54pm
Re: Re: Any real life experience?Bob Businessman wouldn't be playing with putty and refusing to answer questions.
As for Guantanamo: the overwhelming majority of people being held there deserve to be there. Furthermore, it isn't a gulag or a deathcamp. The detainees are treated humanely. (Being captured on a battlefield kinda blows the "I'm innocent!!!" defense. =))
As for questioning authority: Sorry to burst your bubble, but you're not Tank Man. Neither was she.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:17pm
Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?
Bob Businessman wouldn't be playing with putty and refusing to answer questions.Neither was she, so what does that have to do with it?
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:21pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?"She was holding a lump of what looked like putty in her hands."
"The employee asked about the plastic circuit board on her chest, and Simpson walked away without responding, Pare said."
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/breaking_news/2007/09/mit_student_arr.html?p1 =MEWell_Pos3
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:32pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:36pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?Yeah, you're right. People never lie. lmao.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:34pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?HELLO?! When she was asked about her shirt by the counter clerk, she responded, "This is art."
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:19pm
Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?The detainees are treated humanely.
Absolutely! Waterboarding is just another way of bathing!
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:41pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?You're forgetting who we're dealing with.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:40pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?"You're forgetting who we're dealing with."
Yeah, you have to make them bathe. Hence the waterboard. It's for their own good really.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:11am
Re: Re: Any real life experience?Huge difference between me using my laptop in an airport and clutching it to my chest, looking about suspiciously while I avoid direct questions.
As for "Gitmo", I was actually stationed there briefly. And if I had my way she would be shot, as would you for your ignorant comments.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:48am
Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?
As for "Gitmo", I was actually stationed there briefly. And if I had my way she would be shot, as would you for your ignorant comments.Why am I not surprised?
GoblinJuice, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:01am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?Why am I not surprised an Anonymous Coward would talk shit?
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 8:45am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Any real life experience?
Why am I not surprised an Anonymous Coward would talk shit?That's funny coming from someone calling himself "GoblinJuice". Is that really what your momma named you?
What a freaking wing-nut sock-puppet hypocrite. No surprise, once again.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:34pm... Can I get one of those t-shirts? I promise I won't wear it in an airport.
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:38pm1) She wanted attention. She got it.
2) I hope she's prosecuted - for something. Stupidity must be punished.
3) You don't have the right to scare people.
4) Law enforcement aren't engineers.
5) A blinky board? She's in college and she's making blinky boards? .... I guess that's a major accomplishment... for a woman engineer. Zing! =D
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:39pm
They're selling haox bombs over the internet!Look! They're selling hoax bombs here!
Quick, somebody call it in!
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:48pm
Re: They're selling haox bombs over the internet!The difference, which you are aware of it, is that these are professionally produced - and look it.
We're talking about a crude, homemade piece of crap. Oh, yeah, she was also PLAYING WITH PUTTY.
AND she REFUSED TO ANSWER a question about her crude, homemade piece of crap.
Again: you don't have the right to scare people, Joe Jackass isn't an engineer, and anyone dumb enough to walk around an airport - acting the way she was - deserves whatever she gets.
Just because you have a problem with authority figures - since, honestly, this is what the anti-cop/pro-girl bullshit boils down to - doesn't mean you have the right to scare the public.
"Don't tase me, bro!!!"
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 10:56pm
Re: Re: They're selling haox bombs over the intern
AND she REFUSED TO ANSWER a question about her crude, homemade piece of crap.She did no such thing. From http://wbztv.com/topstories/local_story_264104114.html ,"A Massachusetts Port Authority staffer manning an information booth in the terminal became suspicious when Simpson -- wearing the device -- approached to ask about an incoming flight, Pare said. She did not respond when the employee asked her about the device she was wearing, so the employee repeated the question, police said. Simpson then said the device was artwork and left the counter and walked around the terminal area..."
OH NO! She didn't hear the question the first time and they had to repeat it! How dare her? Shoot, shoot, shoot!
And when the police asked her about it:
"However, she was rational, and she did answer all questions as required"
Joe Jackass isn't an engineerShe's in the engineering program at MIT.
you don't have the right to scare people.People like you scare me. Collectively, you're a far bigger threat to my daily safety and this country than OSB or AQ could ever hope to be.
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:10pm
Re: Re: Re: They're selling haox bombs over the in
"However, she was rational, and she did answer all questions as required"
Yeah, most people get real cooperative when the cops get involved. lmao.
She's in the engineering program at MIT.
Joe Jackass isn't an engineer. The average citizen wouldn't know the difference between an LED and a resistor. Nor should they be expected to.
People like you scare me. Collectively, you're a far bigger threat to my daily safety and this country than OSB or AQ could ever hope to be.
You have no idea how hard I just laughed. My friggin' stomach hurts.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:14pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: They're selling haox bombs over th
You have no idea how hard I just laughed. My friggin' stomach hurts.Yeah, I can just hear it. Kind of has an evil tone to it.
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:16pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They're selling haox bombs oveYou may find this surprising, but that isn't the first time someone has said that....
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:51pm
IdiocracyBeing an MIT electrical engineering student means two things:
1. She probably isn't stupid.
2. She probably isn't used to dealing with stupid people either.
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 10:22pm
Re: IdiocracyYou're expecting... a chic that works at an information booth... to analyze a circuit... and tell the difference between C-4 and silly putty?
...and you're calling the infobooth chic stupid?
Get real.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:09pm
Re: Re: Idiocracy
You're expecting... a chic that works at an information booth... to analyze a circuit... and tell the difference between C-4 and silly putty?If you can't, then perhaps you shouldn't pretend that you can.
...and you're calling the infobooth chic stupid?You're saying a person has to be highly intelligent to work an "infobooth"?
Talk about getting real.
But I can excuse someone in such a position because they aren't particularly dangerous. It's the cops with the submachine guns that are the problem.
GoblinJuice, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:15pm
Re: Re: Re: IdiocracyUh, what? I said a person working at an infobooth shouldn't be expected to know such things. The exact opposite of what you thought I said. =P
Random Thoughts, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:58am
Re: Idiocracy1. Being an MIT engineering undergrad she probably knows a lot of stuff. However, her social skills and 'common sense' are probably rudimentary at best. So, when it comes to almost any social or 'real-life' public situation she probably IS stupid. Very stupid. Darwin Award quality.
2. As for dealing with stupid people - the writer seems to think higher education means not stupid. I'm constantly amazed at the stupidity of many college graduates, regardless of school or major. It wouldn't surprise me if as many as half of the engineering graduates in America think it is all about following formulas and equations and have never learned to think. I meet many people with no more than a high school education who know how to think and are far from stupid! This brainless MIT girl was stupid in her failure to react in an intelligent way to a curious question that an intelligent person would have expected somebody to ask sooner or later. By walking away without replying she showed how stupid she is.
zcat, 21 Sep 2007 @ 9:59pm
My 2c for what it's worth..This girl is an idiot. IED's can look like just about anything.
If you walk around an airport carrying (or wearing) any kind of homemade electrical circuit and something in your hand that could be plastic explosive, you should expect to be at least questioned by airport security.
If you ignore them and walk away, you should expect to get shot.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 11:11pm
Re: My 2c for what it's worth..If you walk around wearing anything you should expect to get shot. Clothes can be used to hide all kinds of things.
Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2007 @ 10:09pm"IED's can look like just about anything"
Which is precisely why the police (over)reaction was idiotic. Her shirt was just as likely (or even less likely) to be an explosive device as the business man's laptop.
Tracy, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:23amDisgraceful. She is a genius. The only thing is that she over-estimated other peoples intelligence. A 5-year old could clearly see that wasn't a bomb. What about all these other flashing T-Shirts and hats you can buy? If the Boston PD sees a 5-year old playing one of the portable games with flashing LEDs are they going to arrest him and charge him with a hoax device?
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:44am
Re:"If the Boston PD sees a 5-year old playing one of the portable games with flashing LEDs are they going to arrest him and charge him with a hoax device?"
A 5-year old probably would follow orders quickly or correctly enough. They'd obviously have no choice but to shoot the little bastard. Can't be too careful you know.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 4:10am
Re: Re:Oops, that should have been "...probably not follow..."
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:26am
The Scary part...You guys rant about the injustice of her getting arrested and held at gun point for a stunt, you complain about the unethical treatment of prisoners in Cuba, you whine about how inhumane our troops treat detainees...
Why don't I hear people complaining about innocent people being beheaded? Why don't I hear complaints about convoys of -OUR- soldiers being ripped apart by explosives? Why don't I hear complaints about the torture and murder of soldiers? Why aren't you complaining about the fact that -OUR- soldiers are dying?
No, you think that complaining about the motives behind the war and how things have changed after we were attacked is the same as supporting troops and complaining about -their- treatment. You take something like this and try to twist it into an example of how our government is out of control? Do you have the ability to have a dissenting opinion about the government without being black-bagged? You liberal morons disgust me, because that is what a majority of you are, you mistake your own political agendas and personal morals as patriotism and support for our armed-forces. Forget this discussion... I can't understand how Techdirt is in any way a method of corporate America to get its finger on the pulse of America considering their methodism here. Take a story they know nothing about and pretend to be experts; I HAVE AN MBA! Funniest part is how many people complain about the evils of monopolies and corporate America, then they boost up Techdirt whose purpose is to provide companies with partial news stories with a twist of an amateur opinion. Officially removed from my google page...
I think I'm going to go read some actual news.
silicon.shaman, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:20am
Re: The Scary part...Yeah, that's right Thale, you go watch FOX NEWS...
GoblinJuice, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:00am
Re: Re: The Scary part...Oh, man, I love FoxNews Channel. The news isn't anti-American and the womens are hot. =D
I will forever curse CNN for stealing Kiran! DAMN YOU CNN!
PaulT (profile), 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:21am
Re: The Scary part...hmmm... obvious troll but I'll bite. The reason our soldiers are fighting the war, being beheaded, whatever, is because of the ridiculous 'war on terror'. Stories like this one show how much panic there is, and how authorities would rather spread more panic than admit a mistake (in this case, call the device a 'hoax', creating the impression that the girl was trying to fool the authorities in some way - she wasn't).
I think most of us 'liberals' support the troops, we simply don't support the reasons they are there. We would rather see them come home rather than die in the name of panic and terror. Remember, terrorists are called terrorists because they want to spread TERROR, not because they kill people in the process. Stories like this just remind us that they've already won, regardless of what our troops do overseas.
GoblinJuice, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:01am
Re: Re: The Scary part...Saying "I support the troops" and actually supporting them are two very, very different things.
Sorta like the deadbeat Dad who says he loves his kids, but hasn't done jack for them in years.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:59am
Re: The Scary part...Do you have the ability to have a dissenting opinion about the government without being black-bagged?
Black bagging? As in over-the-head? That's kind of your specialty, isn't it Gitmo boy?
GoblinJuice, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:02am
Re: Re: The Scary part...Gitmo boy?
I'm sure you're too damn busy playing with yourself to realize it, you insignificant little fuck, but the military is protecting your worthless ass.
Maybe in fifty years you'll realize just how much.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:34pm
Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...You have no idea who you are talking to and yet you make assumptions based on what you want to believe. You really are pretty ignorant. So let me tell you a little about myself.
I come from a family with a US history that goes back to back to 1600's colonial days and we have fought with distinction in every damn war this country has ever been in from the revolutionary war forward. There's even a general or two in there. Sure, my family has sacrificed and died for this country, but so have many others. That doesn't make us special, we just try to do our part.
As for my self, I did my bit in the military. These days I'm one of the guys who provide the "protection" that keeps people like Gitmo Boy alive. I'm a weapons engineer designing the kind of weapons for the US that make it the top military power in the world today. Yes, that's right. I said that our weapons technology is mainly responsible for our military power. Consider this: In the Iraq conflict, if the weapons technology roles were reversed who do you think would have prevailed? I mean if Saddam and his troops had all the weapons the US had (nuclear submarines, intercontinental nuclear missiles, aircraft carriers, stealth bombers, cruise missiles, etc., etc., etc.) and the US troops had the weapons Saddam had (a bunch of rusty old Soviet tanks, etc.), do you think the outcome of our invasion would have been the same? I can practically hear you screaming "Hell yeah cuz our troops is da best! They can do anything!" but that's bullshit. It would have been a massacre of US troops. If not for people like me. So just who's protecting who?
As for Gitmo, I've actually been there so I'm not speaking out of total ignorance. Most of the people in the military are fine people who join the military for various reasons, mostly related to a combination of benefits and patriotism. But there are a few bad apples who see joining the military more as a way of getting away with things that would land them in prison as a civilian. One of the most disgusting things I encountered in Gitmo was listening to a couple of the bad apples brag about mistreating prisoners. These guys were basically bullies in uniforms and their attitudes reminded me of the poster who commented about how he would basically like to murder those whose disagree with him. So I dubbed him Gitmo Boy. For all I know, he may even be one of those individuals I encountered there.
So GoblinJuice, if you and "Gitmo Boy" Thales ever feel like being the superheroes you think you are, I suggest you forgo the mere mortal technology that people like myself provide and just go running into battle bare handed using your superpowers to conquer all. I won't miss you two a bit. And neither, I suspect, will the people you would have liked to have murdered for disagreeing with you.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:51pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...The weapons technology is the only thing that makes a soldier a soldier? Isn't that interesting... That makes me wonder why I had to learn Unarmed Combatives, survival training, rank and file and the stuff in AIT.
I fail to see how what you have said has any relevance on what we have been discussing. No one claimed to be a hero, I certainly didn't, and I sure as hell didn't say I would murder anyone who disagreed with me. I didn't exult my greatness or beat my chest, I stated facts which I knew to be true and stated my opinion, never placing myself above anyone other than the jerk who posted about communist China. In fact I think I went out of my way to establish I had no part in any inhumane or dehumanizing acts with in "Gitmo"... but I guess when you're in a rush to seem like an asshole you can't be bothered to read. I'm so glad that your family tree and the weapons that you produce have single-handedly given us an edge in every war and conflict the country has taken part in. After this I'm going to write a letter to my congressman telling him that my training in the Army was ineffectual and pointless and that we simply need better weapons. Never mind the fact that a grunt on the ground with an M16a2 and proper training is one of the most effective and discerning methods of combat.
My sister was near the second tower when it collapsed, she was in the Army at the time on leave visiting her boyfriend, she was caught in the collapse and killed... that was my reason for joining, and I served for her. It wasn't to seek revenge, if that were the case I would have applied for an infantry position. Prior to joining I was working towards a degree in computer programming, now I'm finishing my 1st year of medical school with the idea of reenlisting if possible. Don't presume to call me a bully when my intentions are to help people... don't presume to think that you are a hero either. You obviously can't read the discussion that has gone on here, but hey, you make the weapons that save the world, right?
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:09pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...
As for "Gitmo", I was actually stationed there briefly. And if I had my way she would be shot, as would you for your ignorant comments.Followed by
I sure as hell didn't say I would murder anyone who disagreed with me.Liar.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:13pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...And that is me saying that I would murder anyone who disagreed with me? See the comment above yours. Also, take the time to at least post an alter-ego if you plan on continuing your expose on how I'm evil for serving in the military and having a dissenting opinion.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:17pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...The best part is how you overlooked the other violent comments posted by the guys on the other side of the fence... I guess since he shares your views you are stricken blind. Hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance are skills that your "type" practice with a deft efficiency, I would guess from use.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:40pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...dude, he just said he would have certain commenters shot. you can shoot people without killing them you know. and maybe he didnt even mean with a gun maybe he meant with a camera or sumthin.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:46pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...I meant a gun, but not literally. And yes, they seem to compliment each other well, too bad registration isn't required, or confined to a single IP. But I guess if someone is a big enough loser they will irrevocably find a way around it.
I think I'm going to call this discussion in the corner of those who agree with me, when you consider the concise method with which we've dissected their hypocritical crud I would say it is a knockout. Furthermore, just to be a l33t-d00d; I agree, I call Godwin's Law... therefore the discussion ended when the issue of Hitler was introduced. Not only do I win in a logical, civil debate, I guess Yar wins for being the first to call shenanigans on the anti-Bush/Anti-War rhetoric. Kudos to him and those that can actually have a discussion without turning into incoherent, slavering boobs.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 8:47am
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part...dude, he just said he would have certain commenters shot. you can shoot people without killing them you know. and maybe he didnt even mean with a gun maybe he meant with a camera or sumthin.
Bullshit. I think his meaning was clear.
Anonymous Coward, 27 Sep 2007 @ 9:22pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Scary part..."After this I'm going to write a letter to my congressman telling him that my training in the Army was ineffectual and pointless and that we simply need better weapons. Never mind the fact that a grunt on the ground with an M16a2 and proper training is one of the most effective and discerning methods of combat.
You know, the last time I checked the M16 was a weapon. Maybe you should tell him you don't need any of those either.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:15pm
Re: Re: The Scary part...Actaully no, that would be the guys standing in front of a camera with black bags over their heads, hiding their faces while they cut a man's head off. Then refuse to show Sadam in his tighty whities due to humane treatment concerns...Do you think Christian hostages are given bibles? Do you think they get to observer their religious customs? They believe infidels should be killed end of story.
Goblin, 50 years to think won't change anything.
Joe Citizen, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:45amLets look at this the other way around...Say that she really had a bomb. Set it off and killed a few people. Then we would be sitting here asking why security was not smart enough to see the bomb. I would rather the one individual be embarrassed instead of seeing a whole lot of bodies in the news.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:38am
Re:Lets look at this the other way around...Say that she really had a bomb. Set it off and killed a few people. Then we would be sitting here asking why security was not smart enough to see the bomb.
You don't speak for me. I'm quite a bit more reasonable than that.
Pavel Gogotsi, 22 Sep 2007 @ 7:30am
Re: Re:Yea, however most bombers don't proudly display bombs is they actually plan on doing something. However, I do think that she was pushing it with having the play-doh in her hands.
Silicon Shaman, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:29am
WTF?!Ok, first a disclaimer;
I am not now, nor have I ever been a terrorist sympathizer, patriot or partisan to American politics. I am, as a point of fact, a British citizen with some American friends.
Having said that... people, sections of your country's government & law enforcement are seriously out of control !
This incident is just one more example of what happens when you have an atmosphere of paranoia and rampant authoritarianism... and frankly, given the tone of some of the commenter's here, I am not surprised.
Good Lord people, whatever happened to "Land of the Free, and Home of the Brave"?
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:55amAll I really want to know is, Is this chick hot?
GoblinJuice, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:01am
Monarch, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:06amDorpus Troll hit a new low on this thread. The consumate conspiracy theorist defending the stupidity of the police in Boston. Hmmm, wonder if Dorpus is employed by the Boston PD???
zcat, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:11am
Not saying it's right but...Not that I'm defending the air of paranoia. Over the last six years, 3000 people have been killed by terrorist bombings.. compare that to plain old homicide, 96,000. Drunk driving, 102,000. lack of healthcare, 108,000. Suicides, 180,000.. hell, you're about 60 times as likely to kill yourself as get killed by a terrorist. The numbers all go up from there too.. I haven't seen any cause-of-death numbers lower, nobody bothers to keep track of the 'falling-satellite' death toll. The level of paranoia is totally fucking insane compared to the actual risk!
But it's still there. You'd have to have been living under a rock since mid-2001 to not know that walking around any airport in the USA (let alone Boston) carrying any kind of homemade exposed-wires-and-batteries circuit board is going to result in at least some questions. Or on a bad day, a bullet first and questions afterwards.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 6:42amIf you worked at Gitmo, you should be shot. Here's a cluepon for you and any fellow facists reading, If dimwit dubya haddn't mired us in Viet Nam V2.0 troops wouldn't be coming home in body bags.
Hey, but you must have volunteered, so suck it up and enjoy the good times. Lemme guess, you kinda get hard when you hear taps?
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 3:20pm
Re:Spoken like a true Crusader, glad your opinion is the only one that has value...you even brought the facist and Vietnam remarks into it, though you should have compared Bush to Hitler to complete your rant.
Just this, 22 Sep 2007 @ 8:58am
The sad thing is:It is sad that after billions of dollars of expenditures on homeland security, those officers securing such an important airport have STILL not been trained to visually identify the key defining elements of a real explosive device versus a fake one. Hint: if it has blinking LED's, it is now more likely to be one than a box of chocolates.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:11am
She's lucky she didn't pull this stunt in anotherBecause there's a good chance she would have more holes in her than Swiss Cheese.
Whatever opinion one has about the reaction to this person's behavior, she initiated this situation and did nothing to diffuse concerns about her "art." No matter how "smart" this woman is, she did something stupid.
Part of any punishment should include working at Logan Airport for the TSA. Who knows, maybe one of her classmates will pull a stunt on her.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:21amThe major news companies have picked this one up, they have a lot more details on it. The police are 100% correct in her situation.
And according to your ignorant comments, i can just put blinking LEDs on my bomb and it should be able to go any where.
Sefu binta, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:24am
The really Sad ThingThe really ad thing is that we talk about being free and look at how we live. We cower in our corners like scared children at the first blinking light or closed paper bag. We spend billions "protecting" ourselves. What are we protecting. We have messed in everyone else's business that they no longer admire the US but they hate the US. We have perpetrated so much crap on the world that we are no longer safe at home. did Ronald Reagan really win the cold war. Have we just become another soviet union, with a KGB (Homeland Security). 9-11 did change american life. For a while we were the envy of every nation, now we are the laughing stock of the world, ducking and dodging every blinking light and paper bag we see.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 12:50pm
What are we coming to?Are this country's security forces run by Frank Burns (did anyone get that "M*A*S*H" reference). The average American-based security/public-defense employee has become nothing more than a schitzophrenic, borderline incompetent, frenetic twerp that become extremely neutotic at anything that is not in the major norm (then again, what is?).
Widget, 22 Sep 2007 @ 1:09pm
Society of FearLet's see: Police prepared to use deadly force to intercept wires, battery, flashing lights, squishy stuff, and words on a shirt. What kind of fool does that make you to carry your iPod and your cell phone with ear buds into an airport? Oh, and don't forget that plastique has the right weight and jiggle to be smuggled on a plane as breast augmentation. Will you lineup for the new security position of Breast Inspector when they realize that? Get a grip, folks. They have already won. We are afraid of shoes.
On another note, it makes me sad that our school system releases so many graduates in such abysmal ignorance that a kiosk attendant is excused for not knowing anything about a few simple electronics just because she isn't an engineer, and then everyone here takes it as valid. It is shameful how ill-informed the majority of our citizens are. It is even more shameful that we find it acceptable.
Dave, 22 Sep 2007 @ 1:48pm
smugThe easy answer, which I largely agree with, is that it's an over-reaction. The thing was harmless.
But it doesn't consider context. Let's see, Logan airport - origin of 9/11 multiple fiery death planes. Um, would it be surprising that Logan employees might be just a little bit overly vigilant, maybe even bordering on paranoia? And knowing that, even if you were 100% harmless, wouldn't you want to at least try a little bit to avoid calling attention to yourself? And even if it's wrong, oh, so WRONG to do that to an innocent student, especially in OUR United States, wouldn't it occur to you that maybe, just maybe, they might make an example of you, and it might stick due to political pressure?
Of course not. This is normal behavior for an adolescent college student, even a brainiac. "Nothing can happen to me - I'm invincible, I'm smart, and mummy and daddy will fix it if I make a little booboo. ROTFL!" And by her smug expression in court, it's pretty clear that she doesn't give a sh*t. At least her own mother had the sense to say that she was stupid. She's essentially right, but extremely stupid.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:26pm
Couldn't help myself...I should be shot for doing what I signed up for? You have no idea what I did in the military, you have know idea what I did at Guantanamo or what actually goes on there. Let's say I was a line-cook and I served food to soldiers and prisoners, whould I still be shot?
I was a 97Bravo, Counter-Intelligence, and I was responsible for disseminating information from enemy-combatants and detainees. I can say this with certainty, I never treated anyone with disrespect or inhumanity. I never struck, chained, whipped, starved, tortured or debased anyone I came into contact with. I hear about how Fox News twists things into a conservative, Pro-Bush direction but what about the news you receive? You've heard somewhere or another than we are torturing and mistreating EVERY captured person... While I can't speak for things now, or previous to my arrival in Cuba, I can say that it did not happen when I was around. I will concede that there is no such thing as a non-biased media, which is quite remarkable considering the liberal fools who posted can't offer the same introspective evaluation of their beliefs. I will also concede that facts were skewed and hidden prior to our invasion, but there are facts that none of us are aware of. I like to think that our government is willing to play the part of the bad-guy because certain facts are classified or sensitive, and I also like to delude myself, for lack of a better term, into believing that in 50 years information will be declassified that exonerates what has transpired in Iraq.
Truth be told, I don't support the war as it is being fought, I don't believe the motives of our invasion based on the facts presented to us, but I do believe that I was doing the right thing. I was partnered with an Iraqi translator right out of AIT, he and I became friends despite the stereotypes we both assumed of each other's culture and we often clashed about the morality of the things we were both doing. However, we both agreed that, once the zealous religious sects and foreign fighters were ousted, Iraq would be a better place than it was when Saddam was in power. This translator's brother, sister-in-law and their children were all victims of torture and murder, and several of his cousins were killed during sectarian attacks after Saddam was deposed, but he still believed these things... He believed that what he was doing was creating a country where something like that wouldn't happen, he believed that he SHOULD be entitled to the same freedom's Americans are able to enjoy, he believed that it was worth dying for the cause of creating a new country, he believed that we (*American Soliders) were "Godsent". He also knew that there would be many, many more casualties before things got better and that it was likely he would be one of them. The point? He was willing to die for the betterment of his country, and I am willing to die for the betterment of ours and his.
You are right though, I did volunteer... and you didn't... so when you speak of what happens in Iraqistan or "Gitmo" you aren't speaking from experience or personal insight, you are speaking from someone else. Isn't that what most liberal, Bush-haters accuse conservative republican's of doing? Eating the patrio-facist, delusional lies that comprise Fox News' broadcasts? Look inward...
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:59pm
Re: Couldn't help myself..."I can say this with certainty, I never treated anyone with disrespect or inhumanity. I never struck, chained, whipped, starved, tortured or debased anyone I came into contact with."
That seems a little hard to believe coming from someone who has professed a desire to murder people for making comments he disagrees with. No, it sounds more some kind of canned denial being read from a script.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:08pm
Re: Re: Couldn't help myself...Mmmhmm...
A professed desire to murder people? *GASP* You've found me out! But man is the most dangerous prey of all!
Using the same thought process we could safely assume that any jovial, good-natured (or otherwise) threats that have ever been spewed from your officious craw or have guttered from your fingers are a window into your homicidal urges? If not then I call you a hypocrite.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:07am
Re: Re: Re: Couldn't help myself...Thales wrote:
As for "Gitmo", I was actually stationed there briefly. And if I had my way she would be shot, as would you for your ignorant comments.Jovial and good natured? I don't think so. But if you're entertained by such things then I can see how you'd think that. I always wondered who bought those kind of videos.
Yar, 22 Sep 2007 @ 5:51pm
Hitler!?Godwin's law , damnit!
Danny, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:58am
Re: Hitler!?Have things gotten this bad? Mind you this is so off-topic now that trying to bring it back on topic would result in off-topicness.
dualboot, 22 Sep 2007 @ 7:19pm
a happy (? okay, less hostile) mediumin other words, let's get back to the original topic. Many people have cited many points both for and against the airport response; some logical, some not so logical. While I see the point that we don't want everything to be considered a bomb, saying that her actions are equivalent to carrying an ipod is exaggerating a bit. Electronics go through the X-ray machines, as do our shoes and liquids, to check for danger. You can no longer keep your car curbside at airports or government buildings, nor leave bags unattended for fear that they could contain something dangerous. These are rules that protect us. When you bring your mp3 on the airplane, it has been verified as not harmful by the x-ray machine. However, when you wear clothing containing a home-made circuit board, which can't be sent through the x-ray unless someone implements a new airport nudity policy, you should expect security to be concerned. I would be worried if she was not stopped.
Some of your comments about shooting her are a bit over-zealous,but the idea of letting her walk around the airport that way seems a bit like asking for trouble. I think stopping her to investigate was completely appropriate and necessary. I used to carry many electronics with me while traveling, but have used my common sense to determine that it would no longer be a wise decision, and so limit myself to first the necessary components now. I think others should do the same, and not bring in anything other than a cell phone if you're just picking up someone. The rest (including artsy circuit-board shirts) is entirely unnecessary to the task of retrieving your friend.
Victor Mess, 22 Sep 2007 @ 8:56pm
GitmoHey dude, you know why so many people believe that we are torturing detainee's at Gitmo, and why Iraq is a losing mess. Look at how they treat prisoners here in US jails and prisons. In case you don't know prisoners are beaten, ganged up upon, stomped and murdered while in custody. Watch the prison stories on MSNBC and watch the coward (guards) gang up on inmates. Where if you or I were meet in the streets by a dude with a bat or a knife we would have to fact that threat. So what do you suppose the same types would do to "enemy combatants" that no-one gives a damn about. The military and police are full of pin-headed, weak-knee'd jerks that put on a uniform and think they have grown balls.
A friend of mine encountered a corrections officer in a Sams club store and beat the crap out of him because as he explained to me he was the kinda guy that thought he was tough on the inside, but for real he was a chump on the outside.
And about the Vietnam thing, I am a Vietnam Vet and it gripes my azz to hear that 20 years later they finally admit that Vietnam was a joke. 53,000 lives lost, for nothing, you would have thought we learned our lesson about going to countries having a war to make other people live the way we do when they really don't want to live like US. Lets stop now and not let another 47,000 lives be lost. Not to mention how Vietnam vets are treated.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 9:20pm
Re: GitmoI wasn't aware that they didn't want to live like us... that they don't want freedom. Did you take a census of the popular opinion of the status quo? I would have to say that, in my limited questioning of the non-extremists, they thought we were doing something good and sought to establish at least a few parallels of American society.
But I guess you would know, having taken that census, and having seen those specials on MSNBC. It always amuses me when people complain about violence and perpetrate it themselves, or condone the actions of one group and not the other.
zcat, 22 Sep 2007 @ 9:50pm
# Re: GitmoYou know the really funny thing. Forty-odd years from now when the USA is fighting this exact same war again in some yet-undetermined country I am betting it it will be you, Thales, reposting the opinion currently held by Victor Mess from your perspective as an "Iraq Vet"
You just don't know it yet.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:09pm
Re: #I'm sure, since he and I have everything in common, not just veteran status. Since there are more events in life than serving in the military, I think other things I do with have a relevant bearing on how I feel in "forty-odd years"... then again, I could be wrong. I mean, the generation he grew up in has everything in common with the one I did, his political views are mine, his social and moral opinions are the same as those I cling to. I can see that I will grow up to be exactly like him. I don't know what he does for a living, but I'm sure kismet will see me abandoning medical school in some sort of Freudian coincidence to follow whatever career he is/was in...
In case you can't tell that was sarcasm. There are more things in life that shape who I am and will be than my military service and political beliefs. You are a prophet, zcat.
zcat, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:28pm
Re: Re: #I guess we'll see.
Better still, run it backwards. What were guys like Victor saying back when they first signed up? Probably something about doing the right thing, freeing the popilation.. I guess you'd have to go look at some old newsreels or something.
Ronnie, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:08pm
BOSTON SUCKSOh my god, all you people who say, "she's lucky she didn't get shot" should all go live in communist China...You're all fascists...
Boston is total shite, so is all of Massachusetts. The Boston police, and ESPECIALLY the Mass State Police are all scumbags!
Screw Boston. And screw all of you tools who beg to live in a police state, I hope someone flies a rusty airplane full of AIDS and broken glass into your face. Pricks.
Thales, 22 Sep 2007 @ 10:14pm
Re: BOSTON SUCKSWhat a witty, well composed counter-point to everything you oppose. I'm surprised you haven't assembled your crack wit into some sort of publication...
You rant about tools, but you spew the same recycled opinion everyone else does. Do you know what communism is? Have you lived in an actual police state? I don't think so, but I'm sure the same mental delirium that inspired your garbage post will cause you to say yes.
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2007 @ 11:25pm
GoblinJuice = =Thales ?They sure seem to answer for each other a lot.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 1:26amlawl @ the article and lawl @ Boston police. Least they didnt shoot her lmao imagine the press coverage on that. MIT student shot and killed wearing an lightup sweatshirt by boston police useing an MP5.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 5:19amThales writes:
"I was a 97Bravo, Counter-Intelligence, and I was responsible for disseminating information from enemy-combatants and detainees."
...No wonder we haven't caught UBL.
You're impulsive. You rise to being baited. You're easily angered. You don't listen carefully to subtext. You believe this black and white shit, when the world is all gray.
You can't win an internet message board argument in English. You're getting played here by amateurs. Why on earth would anyone expect YOU to be able to elicit anything useful from enemy combatants?
Curtis D. Warriner, 23 Sep 2007 @ 8:49pm
Re:"You're impulsive. You rise to being baited. You're easily angered."
That sure describes a person that shouldn't be going around with loaded guns. I'm glad he's out of the military and pray he never becomes a cop or prison guard.
Jimbo, 23 Sep 2007 @ 5:39am
911 started out of BostonThe police and security still have tremendous angst and guilt from letting the terroists through on 9/11. They are always going to overreact in Boston.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 6:03am
Re: 911 started out of BostonExcept for the parts that started in Newark.
AHumanMind, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:18am
Appropriate to call police. Disorderly--yes.I've reviewed the video.
a) A breadboard with wires, scotch tape, LEDs and a dangling 9-volt battery was crudely attached to a shirt.
b) The black shirt had hand lettering on the back saying "Socket to me" and "Course VI".
c) Unlike a gameboy or an ipod, this device could intentionally heighten security concerns.
d) It was completely appropriate for a non-engineer to call in the experts to investigate.
e) Society does not need to be permissive to disorderly conduct and antagonistic hoaxes. Thanks #59.
f) The 19-year-old is a good candidate for the Darwin Award as her own "Socket to me" suggests. Thanks #84.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:24amI wonder if she was VI-1 or VI-3...
You understand "Socket to me" is a pun?
Amethyst, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:27amYou don't just walk into an airport these days with anything resembling a bomb, especially not something taped to a shirt. That much is common sense. That college kid did not have it. I hope she's at least learned something from this experience.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 10:23amI'm as liberal as it gets, and I'm not advocating this girl getting shot...but if she had, she'd have been asking for it. Period.
By the way, saying "this is art" and walking away is not an acceptable response when you're questioned about a potential bomb on your person. They decide when to stop asking questions, not you.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 11:01am
Re:They decide when to stop asking questions, not you.
...nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
You NEVER have to answer questions.
If we give up the constitution, then they've already won.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 11:11am
Re: Re:I object on the "fire in a crowded theater" cause, which is exactly what this was.
You're not obligated to answer questions, but they're not obligated to let you into the airport either.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 11:19am
Re: Re: Re:Just like the lite brite case, this was an hysterical overreaction.
They don't have to let you through security, they do have to let you in the airport. She didn't try to get through a secure checkpoint. Would MP-5's have been an appropriate reaction if she had worn the "device" to Copley Place?
You realize the goal of the terrorists is not to win, they know they can't. Their goal is to force us to change the way we live. They are achieving their goals with our hysterical reactions.
Fred the Head, 24 Sep 2007 @ 10:21pm
Re:PeteF3 wrote:
"I'm as liberal as it gets"
Oh man, you just made me snort my coffee...
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 11:29am
Re:No, it's not "just like the lite brite case."
And no, they don't "have" to let you into the airport.
Was Copley Place an origin point of the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history?
By the way, this very same thing would have happened if she had done this in September 1995 or 1975. Airport security and ticket agents don't mess around and never, ever have.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:00pm
Re: Re:No, it's not "just like the lite brite case
We disagree. This was theater. The liquid ban is theater. The shoe thing is theater. The lite brite thing was theater.
And no, they don't "have" to let you into the airport.
If you have legitimate business there (which she did) they do. The can move security out if they like, but it is a public place.
Was Copley Place an origin point of the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history?
No, but it's a moot argument. Copley Place is a far better target for a suicide bomber than an airport. Any mall is. Any movie theater is.
By the way, this very same thing would have happened if she had done this in September 1995 or 1975. Airport security and ticket agents don't mess around and never, ever have.
B.S. Airport security is a joke, it always has been. Getting weapons onto a plane is trivial, even now.
This incident was another example of security theater.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:23pm
Re: Re:By the way, this very same thing would have happened if she had done this in September 1995 or 1975. Airport security and ticket agents don't mess around and never, ever have.
How old are you? In 1975 you could buy a plane ticket for cash, on the plane, with no ID. They didn't even start screening passengers for weapons until 1973.
You ever hear of D.B. Cooper?
Marc, 23 Sep 2007 @ 11:40am
getting shotWith all the trigger happy folk on this post, I don't think
you need to worry about enemy soldiers(terrorists). It sounds like anything that doesn't look like an ipod looks like a "hoax device". guess I'll leave my Cowon at home.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:50pmOld enough to remember "All jokes will be taken seriously" signs years before 2001.
I'm also not a fan of the "Airport security isn't any good, let's just throw our hands up and give up entirely" line of thinking, either.
What specifically is "theater" about what this girl did?
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:55pm
Re:What specifically is "theater" about what this girl did?
What the girl did wasn't theater.
What the cops did was theater. Submachine guns were theater. I'm not saying she shouldn't have been talked to, but drawn weapons (let alone MP-5's), were a huge overreaction given the "threat".
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:54pmBy the way, in 1992 the Supreme Court ruled that airport terminals are, despite technically being public property, are not public forums. Reasonable regulation of expression, which this most definitely was, is permitted.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 12:57pm
Re:That was about the moonies and the hari krishnas, not security.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 1:01pm
Re: Re:Irrelevant. The same principle applies.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 1:00pmHow so?
Again, she's holding an LED device *and* carrying Play-Doh or putty, which absolutely could be construed as a plastic explosive.
Again, they don't have time to take a look at the thing up close. They can only go by what they see from a distance or what they're told.
Again, she had a chance to explain herself ("It's art" is not an explanation) and didn't do it.
Again, with a potential suicide bomber and lives at stake, you have to act and react instantaneously.
Airport screeners and ticket agents are not trained explosives experts. I'm not going to play the ridiculous Slashdot game of "They're too stupid to know better," but...if they see something that looks remotely suspicious, they must act.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 1:25pm
Re:UBL's goal was to have our own citizens become fearful sheep and let the government turn the US into a police state.
In you F3, he's succeeded.
"Freedom isn't free" means that in a free society, sometimes innocent people die in terrorist attacks.
Absolute security and freedom cannot co-exist.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 3:01pm
Re: Re:That isn't what Ben Franklin meant and you should know that.
Do we draw the line at not having police officers at all? The ability to incite a riot if we feel like it?
No, these are not rhetorical questions, I'm serious: where is the line drawn between protection from crime and a loss of freedom?
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:05pm
Re:That kind of reasoning would justify shooting just about anyone on sight. I have a problem with that.
PeteF3, 23 Sep 2007 @ 1:05pmAnd seeing as how nobody actually got shot, I fail to see how "trigger happy" can be applied to these cops. To some of the people posting here, OK. To security? Nope.
Erik, 23 Sep 2007 @ 1:55pm
No IDYou don't HAVE to show ID to fly, even now after 9/11.
Clayton Turner, 23 Sep 2007 @ 2:35pm
IdiotYea, well which one of you idiots would volunteer to disarm it if called upon. I didn't know there was so many munitions experts out there. You and I both know she would call attention to herself.
Nicole P. Bowyer, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:00pm
Re: IdiotHow in the world does one go about "disarming" something that isn't "armed"? That truly sounds like a fool's errand.
Alisha, 23 Sep 2007 @ 3:09pm
Next time I hope they shoot her fat assThey should have shot her. It would have served her right! And I'm no fan of Homeland Security, and I do believe that in general, our government has engaged in a campaign of overreaction and fearmongering. However, in this case, the police had every right to presume that she had a bomb. What if they had just let her go through security without questioning her, and the damned thing really was a bomb?
Overcast, 23 Sep 2007 @ 3:41pmBeing an MIT electrical engineering student means two things:
1. She probably isn't stupid.
2. She probably isn't used to dealing with stupid people either.
Seriously... how can you say taking something that any normal person could at least guess - *might* be seen as a IED by someone else into an airport a good idea? Regardless, if upon 2 seconds of observation it could have been ruled out as an IED, the fact remains - she did a series of stupid things..
College Student != automatically = intelligent, that's for certain.
Actually an intelligent person would have known it was a good idea, to first talk to security about it, prior to even going to the airport. A simple phone call, and then a stop by the security office would have done wonders.
That or maybe - what an INTELLIGENT person would have done, it talk with security and put it in a bag and check the luggage in.
Or perhaps an intelligent person would have sent the item to their destination first via FedEX or UPS.
An intelligent person might have checked the TSA's web page to determine if there would be any cause for concern when wearing a bread board and holding silly putty. Google would have been helpful.
An intelligent person might have waited, answered all of security's questions, and made sure there were no further concerns before attempting to go further into the terminal.
Intelligent people don't go into airports with 'silly' putty and other electronics that might give the impression it's a 'concern'. An Intelligent person would have *known* that ahead of time and not made any assumptions.
The fact that she did not think of any of this ahead of time, either makes her quite stupid or in dire need of attention.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/breaking_news/2007/09/mit_student_arr.htm l
According to what I read there, she walked away without saying a word about it.
That's quite stupid, indeed.
Ten Pound, 23 Sep 2007 @ 4:17pm
well no shitThe BPD and the NYPD and all the PDs across the country are run by, managed by, populated by idiots.
In BPD's case, would it have been so bad to admit they didn't realize these were cartoon devices? They are a police force, I would think they are too busy for watching late night cartoons anyway.
Hoax, my ass. The hoax is on us for having police department that are so stupid and stubborn.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 4:53pmLets see if I get this right. She went into the airport with a lightboard. an AIRLINE employee asks her what it is, she doesn't answer. The airline employee calls in security, and security takes her down. Security then says "we're lucky we didn't shoot her".. for what.. not answering the curiosity of a clerk checking tickets? Was the girl a little wrong in how she handled the situation, yes. But she was under no moral or legal obligation to explain anything to the person who questioned her about it. Had airport security asked, I'm sure the situation would have turned out differently, but it wasn't. So instead airport security and Boston police come off looking like idiots because they issued a press release about something thats a non-issue. Instead of simply going, "oh, mis-understanding all around, you may go". This was handled wrongly by both sides.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 6:35pmwhat is more absurd, is most headlines refered to her sweater as a "fake bomb". It's not at all.. it's not unheard of to have apparel that has some flashing lights. Like those kids shoes with lights in them... they better gun them down could be a bomb. Honestly how dumb can you be if you think that anyone really trying to use a bomb would have flashing lights all over it. A real bomber would keep the bomb concealed.
Anonymous Coward, 23 Sep 2007 @ 6:41pmif that girl looked any bit middle eastern, she would have been shot, called a terrorist, and her entire family sent to Guantanamo
Irving Evans, 23 Sep 2007 @ 9:10pm
When you're a hammer everything looks like a nail.
Enrico Suarve, 24 Sep 2007 @ 1:49am
How do they train these guysApart from the fact that the US is now officially a police state where you can be tazered for talking and shot for failing to follow due fashion sense, the scary thing for me is:
She was arrested for having a hoax device - if a breadboard with a few wires and a flashy lit up sign is a hoax device, exactly what training do these 'security' guys get?
Appropriate response to a would be ask to leave, escort outside, check device, apologise for inconvenience/warn that wearing stuff like that in an airport is likely to scare people who know nothing about bombs/security etc
That's if your man has a clue about what constitutes a bomb - but since this is Boston where flashy signs and roadside traffic counters are bombs you have no chance (yes they also blew up a city owned and positioned traffic counter as a 'suspicious' device earlier this year)
America - land of the pacified and home of the scared
I'm just waiting for the first time they have to justify shooting a skier as "it looked like he had a bazooka"
Be honest - the Nazis you employ in airports are just there to remind everyone that you sure as fuck have no rights, and you can and will be screwed with if you so much as even THINK about stepping out of line
Keep drinking the Kool-aid – nothing to see here
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2007 @ 3:59amI wasnt sure about how I felt about this until I saw the pic of the device in the NY Times. LOL its a freaking experimental board with LEDs formed in a Star type shape with the wires held onto the board with tape. What kind of Idiot even thinks that could be a bomb?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/22/us/22airport.html?em&ex=1190606400&en=cb58d156ee5 f2222&ei=5087%0A
Ferin, 24 Sep 2007 @ 4:54am
Argh!I like Massachusetts, for a variety of personal and idealogical reasons. It kills me when this kind of shit goes on there.
These people watch too many chuck norris movies. What kind of moronic terrorist puts light up doohickeys on a freaking bomb? "Hey, lookee at my bomb! It tells you how much time is left, whether or not it's active and glows real bright so you cna find it easily!"
RandomThoughts, 24 Sep 2007 @ 6:06amI think its pretty funny that folks write that someone that was willing to blow themselves up would really care what the devise looks like.
What does a car bomb look like? A car. What does a shoebomb look like? A shoe. Could this have been a bomb? Yes, it could have. Do you want to be the person responsible for walking up to someone in an airport and asking "excuse me maam, is that a bomb?"
The way to execute that mission is from as far away as possible with a long rifle.
Had this happened in Iraq, I am pretty sure someone would have zapped her. Considering what happened concerning Logan 6 years ago, it wouldn't have been unbelievable that she would have been shot.
Personally as soon as I saw a pic of her with the statement, I figured it was some kind of prank.
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2007 @ 10:07am
What does a shoebomb look like? A shoe. Could this have been a bomb? Yes, it could have. Do you want to be the person responsible for walking up to someone in an airport and asking "excuse me maam, is that a bomb?"That's absolutely right. Anyone stupid enough to wear shoes to an airport these days deserves to be shot on sight. I would consider it my patriotic duty to volunteer for the job of sniper (fully paid "volunteer" of course).
The way to execute that mission is from as far away as possible with a long rifle.
PeteF3, 24 Sep 2007 @ 7:06amAnyone who's trying to use the "Why would a terrorist be so obvious?" argument is making a grave mistake in assuming that a terrorist or suicide bomber would act rationally.
And once again, crying about a "police state" and "overreacting" are glossing over the fact that THE GIRL COULD HAVE BEEN SHOT, AND *WASN'T.*
Also, the object clearly fits the legal definition of "hoax device," so there's no problem there either.
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2007 @ 10:14am
Re:(b) For the purposes of this section, the term "hoax device" shall mean any device that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such device is an infernal machine.
Notice the lack of the phrase "by an idiot" in there.
Nick (profile), 24 Sep 2007 @ 11:03amThe problem here is the wording of the Massachusetts's Chapter 266: Section 102A1/2 is that it takes us down a slippery slope. It brings us closer to a police state, where we are less free and where our own flare of terrorist has created our own state-sponsored terrorism. It is giving authorities permission to terrorize is in the name of safety, reducing our quality of life, interfering with my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Fear from of the people who are supposed to protect me is not my idea of freedom.
Pro, 24 Sep 2007 @ 11:22am
Stupid"Stupid" is a tough term to apply to someone. Most of the MA police can't do multiplication, but they make a shitload of money - so who's stupid? Corrupt, definitely. By keeping a state of panic, they are able to constantly day in and day out keep an inflated budget and be fat and happy.
Maybe they are stupid though, this is the same bunch that - upon seeing all the kids going crazy after the sox won the ALCS in 2004, started shooting them down from rafters with souped up paintball guns filled with pepper spray. They didn't manage to kill any of the kids by shooting them off the rafters, but they did manage to kill a college aged girl with a direct shot to the eye. Anyone who has ever seen or heard of paintball knows that you wear eye protection for a reason. None of them could have figured that out before they deployed this "non-lethal" weapon? Or did the O'Finnegan company make and sell the paintball guns...
RandomThoughts, 24 Sep 2007 @ 11:24amSlippery slope? Police state?
Where do you folks live that you live in this fear? I am currently in NYC, listening to all the sirens since the President of Iran is speaking at Columbia University and the President of the US will address the UN. What slope do you speak of? What police state do you address?
Get a clue.
James L. Morse, 24 Sep 2007 @ 11:31am
The Greater GoodSometimes the welfare of an individual must be sacrificed for the greater good of society as a whole. Just as police dogs must be occasionally "rewarded" by being allowed to bite nonresistant suspects (usually ones with "attitude") in order to maintain their motivation, so must must police officers. We simply cannot allow boredom to demotivate our police forces. Thus it is perfectly reasonable for a few individuals to be sacrificed from time to time as training aids. Often times there are other agencies, such as the hazardous-materials teams, that can get in some hands-on training too. And what of personnel like airport counter workers? Surely they could use a little spice in their otherwise thankless jobs.
But the benefits don't stop there. Like the waves from a stone dropped in water, they continue to radiate outward. Consider the immense benefit the news media derive from such stories. Without stories to cover all those people would loose their jobs and that surely wouldn't be good for society as a whole. And then there are all the hard-working public servants who finally get some richly deserved face time on TV to communicate with the public they so faithfully serve. Many of these people also have children that they're trying to support. If nothing else, at least think of the children.
Finally, consider the entertainment value that society as a whole derives. The billions of dollars a year we pay Hollywood to entertain us (money well spent I might add) shows how vital entertainment is to society. It's no coincidence that these things are usually played out like Hollywood movies (except we don't have to buy tickets). Ancient societies understood this well before there was any such thing as a mass media and used such contrivances and public executions and human sacrifice in much the same way. How likely is it that the sacrificed individual would ever have contributed as much value to society in any other way? Not likely, I say. As such, they should be grateful for such an opportunity. Like the girl at the airport. An engineering student? What a waste. We don't need to be making engineers, we can buy all those we want from overseas and at lower prices. We need entertainment and this was her opportunity to rise to the need.
To the naysayers amongst you, I say that your value to society is obviously low. But don't despair, opportunities to better yourselves through self-sacrifice are plentiful and I, for one, would be glad to help you meet such an opportunity. For the greater good, of course.
PeteF3, 24 Sep 2007 @ 7:09pmThat's a very cute Jonathan Swift-wannabe satire piece but it doesn't address any of the issues of the story in any way whatsoever.
Find a real, tangible issue of this country turning into a "police state" and pursue that. Trying to make this girl out to be a near-martyr is a waste of time.
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2007 @ 2:01am
Re:Satire? Dude, I think it was pretty much dead on.
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2007 @ 10:28pm
Thales, PeteF3, GoblinJuice...Damn, I thought you went away mad.
How many sock puppets do you have anyway?
Nick (profile), 24 Sep 2007 @ 11:15pm
Yes, a slippery slopeThis is could be America: First they beat you, shoot you, and/or accuse you of having a bomb or pretending to have a bomb or allowing stupid people to think you are pretending to have a bomb. Next, beat you, shoot you or kill you for opposing the president or tying to talk to another high-ranking politician in person. Next, they throw you in a prison becuase of your nationality or religion. The police state. Is this what you want the future to be like? Oh wait. We are already there. How the hell did that happen? By allowing personal liberties to fall down slippery slope.
RandomThoughts, 25 Sep 2007 @ 9:20amWhom has been shot for pretending to have a bomb? Who has been killed for opposing the president? I know a student was Tasered for disrupting a John Kerry speech, but you want to count that? Who is thrown in prison for their nationality or religion? I am in NJ, we have pretty much everyone around here (including terrorist sleeper cells) and the President of Iran just spoke at Columbia University.
What police state are you talking about?
PeteF3, 25 Sep 2007 @ 12:28pmI'm not a "sock puppet" for anybody else, and I've attached my e-mail address (punchdrunkhistory *at* yahoo *dot* com) to every post. I guess I have to be registered for it to show up, though.
The problem with a bomb is that, ideally, YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO TELL WHAT IT IS. So you can't just "look at" something and determine that it's not a bomb. At the same time, you can't throw up your hands and say, "A terrorist wouldn't do something like that, that can't be a bomb," either.
Other problems: airport security doesn't pay enough to land any sufficiently tech-savvy computer geeks and keep them. Any ones it does land are going to grow bored out of their minds looking at x-rayed bags all day and their work is going to suffer for it.
No, there aren't really any easy answers here.
George Bush, 25 Sep 2007 @ 1:10pm
Re:I'm not a "sock puppet" for anybody else, and I've attached my e-mail address (punchdrunkhistory *at* yahoo *dot* com) to every post. I guess I have to be registered for it to show up, though
The nation much appreciates your exemplary service.
George Bush
suineg, 25 Sep 2007 @ 1:00pm
i know one......when i see one. i've seen enough movies and tv shows to know that bombs always have flashing lights on them and they have wires hanging out too. only a complete RETARD wouldnt know that. i just dont remember what color wire you cut to stop one in case i have to do that someday. i guess i need to rewatch that part.
Add Your Comment


text:
The photo was probably circa 1970 or 71.
I was sitting under a Christmas tree wearing a holiday dress and yellow go-go boots that appeared to be made out of some sort of plastic.
The photo was probably circa 1970 or 71.
I was sitting under a Christmas tree wearing a holiday dress and yellow go-go boots that appeared to be made out of some sort of plastic. I looked to be around 4 or 5. My cousin, a Toler among the many in Little Washington, posted the retro visions from Christmases past at our beloved Grandma Mary Bell�s house to Facebook recently. The pictures were of my cousins, my brother and me with our parents and grandparents.
I had not seen some of those images in decades and several of the pictures I had never seen before. It was a wonderful trip down memory lane. Spending time at Grandma Mary Bell�s tops my favorite childhood moments and seeing evidence of those moments was comforting.
It made me grateful for whoever was behind the camera snapping away, whoever took the film to be developed and whoever kept up with those images all these years.
I�m fortunate to live in an age where sharing an image is as simple as pushing a couple of buttons � the moment can be captured and made available to my whole family through social network sites or cell phones. There are several years worth of images on my Facebook page that my own daughters can visit if they want to take a small journey through childhood memories and family time.
There is a concern that sharing images via anything electronic can be foolhardy, but it�s hard not to get sucked into the instantaneousness of it all. Even though all of our family couldn�t gather for Thanksgiving, we could share images of our festivities on the spot. Although I�m sometimes weary of the all the information flowing so freely, I sure love how it has helped better connect my family tree and keep it connected.
My grandma spent many decades working with the society page at the Washington Daily News and in what was the original form of social networking. She�d report on who was having company, who was having a baby, where the next pot luck was going to be, who was getting married and other goings on.
The stuff she didn�t report on, she handled personally. She knew who needed a job, who needed food, who needed care and who was headed down the wrong path. She�d connect the dots and put folks in touch with each other, or help gather items or give a lecture if needed.
My favorite photo out of the bunch was of Grandma Mary Bell sitting with my cousin, brother and myself. Her arms wrapped around us, her eyes looking at the lens. I easily remembered what it was like being her grandkid. I remembered being loved, supported and adored.
But I sure don�t remember those go-go boots.
Timmi Toler is city editor of The Daily News. Contact her at 910-219-8458 or email@example.com, or join the conversation at facebook.com/JacksonvilleDailyNews or twitter.com/JDNews.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Star Wars R2-D2 Can Coolers
Astromech powers activate! Form of... a can cooler!
- Can cooler shaped like R2-D2
- Keeps your drink cold
- And your X-wing flying
It's difficult to think of a character in the Star Wars universe who was more useful than R2-D2. Princess Leia relied on him to bring her pleas of help to Obi-Wan. Luke Skywalker relied on him to help pilot his X-wing and ultimately destroy the first Death Star. Even Queen Amidala depended on R2 to repair her ship's shields while running the Trade Federation's blockade of Naboo. Now, you, too, can rely on this trusty droid... to keep your favorite beverages cool!
And believe us, R2 knows a thing or two about cold. If the -60° standard of Hoth's nights weren't cold enough, the vacuum of space would surely give this epic droid knowledge of chilling out. Seriously, this R2-D2 Can Cooler is the only civilized way to keep your beverages frosty like Hoth on while chilling on the sands of Tatooine.
Product Specifications
- R2-D2 Can Cooler
- Officially-licensed Star Wars merchandise
- Keeps your drink cold like Hoth and your hand warm like Tatooine
- Rubber inner hugs a standard 12 oz. can perfectly (or a stubby)
- Hole in bottom prevents vacuum and allows condensate to drain
- Materials: Metal exterior, rubber interior
- Dimensions: 4 1/2" tall x 3 1/2" exterior diameter, 2 5/8" inner diameter


text:
Why Dell for university?
Price Match GuaranteeStudents get the best price on PCs from Dell.com with exclusive discounts and a 30-day Price Match Guarantee.
Learn more
Dell Advantage Loyalty ProgramStudents can earn up to 6% back in rewards*^, free expedited delivery, and access to exclusive offers.
Learn more
Dell Preferred AccountIncrease your purchasing power with special financing offers and low monthly payments.^
Learn More
Intel® Core™ ProcessorsThe latest Intel® Core™ Processors provide premium performance and productivity in class or at home.
Learn more
Shop these categories
Laptops and 2-in-1 PCsGo anywhere and stay connected. Spend less time looking for an outlet and more time getting things done. The latest generation Intel® Core™ processors are more power-efficient than ever without sacrificing performance.
Shop now
Desktops and All-in-OnesMajor multitasking for your dorm room. Dell desktops feature the latest generation Intel® Core™ processor with better performance than previous generations.
Shop now
Alienware Gaming PCsWork hard, play harder. The latest generation Intel® Core™ processors provide get better graphics performance versus previous generations.
Shop now
Electronics and AccessoriesComplete your back-to-school setup. Students save an additional 5% on Dell-brand and 3% on non-Dell brand electronics and accessories.
Shop now
Enhance your education with Dell
All of the support. None of the hassle.Dell Premium Support experts are ready 24x7 with less time on the phone for quick and easy issue resolution.
Premium Support includes:
- Anytime access
- Proactive automated support with Support Assist * technology
- Hardware and software support
- Onsite support
Go Premium
A new world of productivity with the latest Intel® processorsThe processor is the brain — and the engine — of your computer. Fast processors help power your programs and tasks, and keep you moving at the speed of life. Select Dell PCs feature the latest processor technology powered by Intel to help you stay productive, entertained and connected to what matters.
Learn more
Don't Just Play. Game.When it's time to take a break from studying and class, you want a PC engineered for peak performance. From powerful Dell Gaming PCs to the ultimate VR-ready Alienware PCs, we're game.
Shop Now


text:
Mobile Working Group
Working Group Inactive
This working group is currently inactive. If you have any questions or would like to discuss continuation of research in this area, please contact [email protected].
Introduction to the Mobile Working Group
Over the past several years, enterprise adoption of mobile, and especially BYOD, has redefined enterprise mobility. It has also opened up a series of difficult-to-solve security and compliance concerns. Common among most of these concerns is an eventual realization that taking control over a set of constantly changing devices not owned and paid for by the enterprise is fraught with legal, privacy, and employee relations challenges. For this reason, enterprises have begun to shift focus from managing and protecting mobile devices to protecting mobile data.
The CSA Mobile Working Group will focus on short, regularly updated research that is both concrete and immediately actionable in CSA member organizations.
Scope and Responsibilities
The working group is chartered to research:
- Evolutionary shift from management of mobile devices to management of mobile data
- Security and audit-ability traveling as an integrated part of corporate data, enabling data security anywhere.
- Augmentation of enterprise identity and authentication with omnipresent mobile devices.
- The impact of public cloud applications on mobility and mobile data protection.
- Concerns and challenges related to BYOD programs, policies, stipends, and user privacy.
Mobile Working Group Leadership
Mobile Co-chairs
Rich Campagna
SVP of Products and Marketing, Bitglass
Rich Campagna is SVP of Products and Marketing at Bitglass where he drives product management and marketing. Prior to becoming an integral team member at Bitglass in April 2013, Rich was senior director of product management at F5 Networks, responsible for access security. Rich gained valuable experience in product management and sales engineering at Juniper and Sprint before F5. Rich received an MBA from the UCLA Anderson School of Management and a BS in electrical engineering from Pennsylvania State University.
Nader Henein
Regional Director, Advanced Cyber Assurance
Throughout my career, I have led the design & implementation of complex, secure, business focused systems. I firmly believe in getting my hands dirty and in the importance of working side by side with a motivated team. I am a lifelong advocate of data governance and privacy with two decades of experience in developing and managing a cohesive information lifecycle to support the business.
I have worked in a wide range of organizations kinking off with two startups where I helped shape the strategy and learned to be prepared for everything and anything. In large multinationals with rapidly changing requirements, I believed in developing processes to scale and streamline growth; I am practical, pragmatic and a natural problem solver and I will do my best to bring these traits to our body of work.
Mobile Working Group Initiatives
Please contact Mobile Working Group Leadership for more information.
Join Working Group
Connect with Us
Mobile Working Group Downloads
Mobile Application Security Testing
The Mobile Application Security Testing (MAST) Initiative is a research which aims to help organizations and individuals reduce the possible risk exposures and security threat in using mobile applications. MAST aims define a framework for secure mobile application development, achieving privacy and security by design. Implementation of MAST will result in clearly articulated recommendations and…
Release Date: June 30, 2016
Mobile Application Security Testing Initiative Revised Charter
Mobile applications are becoming an integral part of not just modern enterprises but also of human existence and a huge part of this shift is due to the emergence of cloud computing. The Mobile Application Security Testing initiative will aim to create a safer cloud ecosystem for mobile applications by creating systematic approaches to application…
Release Date: March 14, 2016
Mobile Application Security Testing Initiative Charter
Mobile applications are becoming an integral part of not just modern enterprises but also of human existence and a huge part of this shift is due to the emergence of cloud computing. The Mobile Application Security Testing initiative will aim to create a safer cloud ecosystem for mobile applications by creating systematic approaches to application…
Release Date: February 16, 2015
Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Mobile Computing
Mobile devices empower employees to do what they need to do — whenever and wherever. People can work and collaborate "in the field" with customers, partners, patients or students and each other. But they need to be supported with always current operational processes and information, whether from apps, the Internet, or documents from other people.
Release Date: November 08, 2012
Mobile Working Group Videos
Difficult to Track Your ROI in a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Environment
Release Date: June 18, 2013
Explaining the Hidden Costs in a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Environment
Release Date: June 18, 2013