text:
Anesthesia for Hip and Knee Surgery
Before your joint replacement surgery, your doctor will discuss anesthesia with you. The selection of anesthesia is a major decision that could have a significant impact on your recovery. It deserves careful consideration and discussion with your surgeon and your anesthesiologist.
Several factors must be considered when selecting anesthesia, including:
- Your past experiences and preferences. Have you ever had anesthesia before? Did you have a reaction to the anesthesia? How do other members of your family react to anesthesia?
- Your current health and physical condition. Do you smoke? Are you overweight? Are you being treated for any condition other than your joint replacement?
- Your reactions to medications. Do you have any allergies? Have you ever experienced bad side effects from a drug? What medications, nutritional supplements, vitamins, or herbal remedies are you currently taking?
- The risks involved. Risks vary, depending on your health and selection of anesthesia, but may include breathing difficulties, allergic reactions and nerve injury. Your surgeon and anesthesiologist will discuss specific risks with you.
- Your healthcare team. The skills and preferences of your surgical and anesthesia team play an important role in the selection of anesthesia.
Types of Anesthesia
There are three broad categories of anesthesia: local, regional and general.
Local Anesthesia
Local anesthesia numbs only the specific area being treated. The area is numbed with an injection, spray or ointment that only lasts for a short period of time. Patients remain conscious during this type of anesthesia. This technique is reserved for minor procedures. For major surgery, such as hip or knee replacement, local anesthesia may be used to complement the main type of anesthesia that is used.
Regional Anesthesia
Regional anesthesia involves blocking the nerves to a specific area of the body, without affecting your brain or breathing. Because you remain conscious, you will be given sedatives to relax you and put you in a light sleep.
The three types of regional anesthesia used most frequently in joint replacement surgery are spinal blocks, epidural blocks and peripheral nerve blocks.
- Spinal Block. In a spinal block, the anesthesia is injected into the fluid surrounding the spinal cord in the lower part of your back. This produces a rapid numbing effect that wears off after several hours.
- Epidural Block. An epidural block uses a catheter inserted in your lower back to deliver local anesthetics over a variable period of time. The epidural block and the spinal block are administered in a very similar location; however, the epidural catheter is placed in a slightly different area around the spine as compared to a spinal block.
- Peripheral Nerve Block. A peripheral nerve block places local anesthetic directly around the major nerves in your thigh, such as the femoral nerve or the sciatic nerve. These blocks numb only the leg that is injected, and do not affect the other leg. One option for a peripheral block is to perform a one-time injection around the nerves in order to numb the leg just long enough for the surgery. Another option for this type of block is to keep a catheter in place, which can deliver continuous local anesthesia around the nerves for up to several days after surgery.
Advantages to regional anesthesia may include less blood loss, less nausea, less drowsiness, improved pain control after surgery, and reduced risk of serious medical complications, such as heart attack or stroke that — although rare — may occur with general anesthesia.
Side effects from regional anesthesia may include headaches, trouble urinating, allergic reactions, and rarely nerve injury.
General Anesthesia
General anesthesia is often used for major surgery, such as a joint replacement. General anesthesia may be selected based on patient, surgeon, or anesthesiologist preference, or if you are unable to receive regional or local anesthesia. Unlike regional and local anesthesia, general anesthesia affects your entire body. It acts on the brain and nervous system and renders you temporarily unconscious.
- Administration. With general anesthesia, the anesthesiologist administers medication through injection or inhalation. The anesthesiologist will also place a breathing tube down your throat and administer oxygen to assist your breathing.
- Risks. As with any anesthesia, there are risks, which may be increased if you already have heart disease, chronic lung conditions, or other serious medical problems.
General anesthesia affects both your heart and breathing rates, and there is a small risk of a serious medical complication, such as heart attack or stroke.
The tube inserted down your throat may give you a sore throat and hoarse voice for a few days.
Headache, nausea, and drowsiness are also common.
Pain Relief After Surgery
The goals of postoperative pain management are to minimize discomfort and allow you to move with less pain in order to participate in physical therapy after surgery. Postoperative pain relief may be achieved using a combination of oral medications or intravenous medications.
A common method of pain control is called "patient-controlled anesthesia" or "PCA." With PCA, you will be able to control the flow of intravenous medication, within preset limits, as you feel the need for additional relief.
If an epidural or peripheral nerve block was used for your surgery, the epidural or peripheral catheter can be left in place and anesthesia can be continued in the postoperative period to help control pain. You may also have control over the amount of pain medication you receive in these catheters, within preset limits.
You will be closely monitored to avoid complications, such as excessive sedation or falls.
The proper use of pain relievers before, during and after your surgery is an extremely important aspect of your treatment. Proper use of pain medication can encourage healing and make your joint replacement a more satisfying experience. Take time to discuss the options with your doctor, and be sure to ask questions about things you do not understand.
Last Reviewed
March 2014
AAOS does not endorse any treatments, procedures, products, or physicians referenced herein. This information is provided as an educational service and is not intended to serve as medical advice. Anyone seeking specific orthopaedic advice or assistance should consult his or her orthopaedic surgeon, or locate one in your area through the AAOS Find an Orthopaedist program on this website.


text:
Search for resources by:
Home >
K-12 Gateway >
Tools >
Lesson Plans
Lesson Tools
The teacher presents a variety of contextual material to the students, using visual reinforcement. At each phase of the input, the teacher checks for comprehension by asking a variety of questions to the class as a whole. The teacher encourages students to work in pairs or small groups to respond to the questions. Calling on one student at a time to respond to the comprehension checks is counter-productive. It takes a lot of time and dampens student interest.
EXAMPLE: "My Favorite Activities"
Teacher presents a slide program or a series of pictures that illustrate the language text to be learned by the students.
I like to read. I like to read news magazines. I like to read the "LA Times" newspaper. I don't like to read the "Orange County Register" newspaper. I like to read weblogs on the Internet. I love to read books about teaching. I don't like to read movie magazines!
I like to dance. I like to dance with my friends. I like to dance international dances. I like to dance with my family. I like to dance in California. I like to dance all day, especially in the evening, around 8 o'clock. I don't like to dance alone.
Click your browser's "Back" button to return to the previous page.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
You are welcome to link to this website.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
'An opportunity' for Lincoln 'to come to us'
School finance focus of education committee hearing
Mary Lou Block admitted feeling nervous before testifying at a legislative committee hearing in Gothenburg.
The city was one of four stops for the Nebraska Unicameral's education committee on Sept. 18 when members heard testimony dealing with the financing of public education and early childhood education programs.Legislators, school officials and the public gathered in the high school performing arts center for the two-hour hearing.
Block, who had never before testified at a legislative hearing, described it as "an opportunity to have Lincoln come to us" and to express a viewpoint.
The rancher said local ability to fund schools is already inappropriately tied to sharply rising agricultural land values.
"If the formula is changed, it will likely hit the ag sector even harder," Block said.
Although agriculture has experienced good growth and revenue, she said that won't continue with input costs changing, prices rising and falling and the persistent drought.
"Over-reliance on ag puts the producer at risk during downturns and makes viability difficult," she said.
Not all ag producers are making perceived profits, she noted, and rising land valuations and high levies to meet school budgets put some at risk.
Block said not everyone involved in ag can afford to pay high prices for land.
"Many choose a more prudent route for their operation and others simply cannot afford it," she explained. "Yet their valuations change, giving the false impression to those unfamiliar with the big picture of agriculture that ag real estate is a revenue source like an oil reserve, waiting to be tapped."
If changes are suggested to state aid to put additional reliance on agriculture, Block said to leave it alone.
She also suggested:
tying valuations into land acquisition prices
seeking additional funding elsewhere
working to control spending.
Karla Jensen, who attended the hearing but didn't testify, agreed that ag is bearing the burden of increased valuation.
Several other local and area residents testified such as Jack Ostergard, Dale Gronewold and Glade Smith of Cozad.
Sen. Greg Adams of York, chair of the education committee, said he will share the testimony given with the revenue committee of which he is a member.
Adams said the state aid formula considers the amount of valuation a district has but doesn't set valuation.
"Other state law determines how land is valued," he said.
The senator said the committee, which had its last hearing in Gretna Tuesday, will review what citizens said to determine whether or not to make adjustments to the state aid formula during the 2013 legislative session.
Adams said the formula tries to direct state aid to districts which have the greatest need.
Gothenburg was chosen as a site because the education committee tries to have hearings across the state, Adams said.
"And we knew Gothenburg would be a good host," he added.
Similar hearings were also in Gering and Albion.
Latest Headlines
- Gothenburg native releases first novel
- We all need help from a friend
- Monsanto hosts 6th annual Safety Day program
- Brady places champ and runner-up at State FCCLA
- Swedes continue conference domination
- Dancing With The Stars changes venues
- Middle-of-the-Pack Finishes For Swede Boys and Girls
- Girls Show Support for Teacher's Cancer Fight


text:
Now that all the Android 4.2, Nexus 4 and Nexus 10 news has settled, we thought it would be a good time to remind you of the Samsung Galaxy Note II. We were invited to last week's Samsung Galaxy Note II North American unveiling in New York City where Samsung put on an impressive show in order to convince the press that the Samsung Galaxy Note II is quite literally "the next big thing."
We plan to do a full review of the Samsung Galaxy Note II, but we thought we'd go over some of the handset's highlights just in case you're chomping at the bit. To say that the Samsung Galaxy Note II is the largest phone I've ever held would be a bit of a lie. I've used 3G-enabled 7-inch tablets to make phone calls from time to time, but there's a huge difference between a tablet that can make phone calls and a phone with a massive 5.5-inch display. Holding the Samsung Galaxy Note II forces you to rethink how you hold your phone. Most of us are probably quite used to interacting with our devices using a single hand. While that's certainly achievable with the Galaxy Note II (Samsung even has settings to make the on-screen keyboard smaller and shift it to the side of the screen to facilitate single-hand typing), we really wouldn't recommend it. Like a tablet, the Note II wants to be securely held with one hand and beckons you to use your other hand to caress its gorgeous display.
The spec sheet of the Samsung Galaxy Note II looks like the world's biggest nerd's wish list to Santa. Samsung has included a 5.5-inch 720×1280 Super AMOLED display, 1.6Ghz quad-core Exynos processor, 2GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, microSd card slot, 8 megapixel camera on the back, 1.9megapixel camera on the front, NFC, 3,100 mAh battery and nearly every radio connectivity option known to mankind. Yes, the list is certainly impressive, but the screen size, battery and S Pen support are the features that make the Note II truly unique.
The Samsung Galaxy Note II's size may be a setback for many, but it lends itself well to the handset's main selling point, S Pen support. Like its predecessor and its much larger brother (Samsung Galaxy Note Tab), the Note II is able to capture all your notes and doodles with the new S Pen. It's longer, wider and lot more sensitive to pressure than previous versions. Note taking is extremely simple. Pull out the pen from the bottom on the Note II, and the device comes to life with various note options. Samsung has created an array for note templates and has even included about a dozen examples to inspire you with different note taking ideas.
The S Pen works flawlessly, but that's not to say the note taking experience is perfect. Samsung's software does have a few glitches here and there. There's noticeable lag when using specific pen types with thicker brushes.
Using the Note II as a phone can be a little unsettling. The massive display on the device forces you to think about how you carry it around when you're not using it. I typically put my HTC One S in my front or back pocket without a thought, but I found I'm constantly holding the Note II in my hand. The issue is not that it won't fit into my pocket, but that it's a hassle to get it in or out of the pocket. For ladies this shouldn't be much of an issue, since the phone can easily be thrown in a purse.
When it comes to performance, the Note II is on par with the best Android phone currently on the market. The quad-core Exynos processor has more than enough power to burn through the most graphic intensive games currently available for Android. The handset also benefits from running on Android 4.1 with Project Butter, which makes Samsung's TouchWiz UI extremely smooth. Keep in mind, that does not mean we endorse Samsung's UI in any way.
The camera on the Samsung Galaxy Note II is impressive. It's hard to say if the phone can outperform the HTC One X or the Galaxy S III, but we'd be surprised if anyone actually complained about the quality. We'll be sharing sample shots and video in our full review.
Our first impressions of the Samsung Galaxy Note II are fairly positive. The device looks good, performs admirably and offers unique functionality. The only real issue people should be concerned about is the size. With its 5.5-inch display, the Note II is massive when compared to my HTC One S, but I find that surfing the web, watching YouTube videos and playing games on the Note II is much more enjoyable. The question that you need to answer is "Can I make room for the Galaxy Note II in my life?"


text:
The City College of New York
140th St and Convent Ave
New York, NY 10031
The CUNY Energy Institute has been able to attain significant resources to provide the practical research needed to develop commercial products to advance sustainable energy technologies with low carbon footprints. The Energy Institute's current research agenda includes developing a low cost rechargeable battery for energy storage, in particular zinc-nickel oxide flow batteries, which cost half as much as nickel-metal hydride batteries and have energy densities that are twice as high. Also research supported by ARPA E, DOE, and NYSERDA has begun on a significantly lower cost battery consisting of zinc manganese dioxide. Currently, a 3 kWh Flow-Assisted Nickel-Zinc Battery has been built and tested at the CUNY Energy Institute and is being scaled up with support from DOE, Con Ed, and NYSERDA to a 200 kWh capacity. The target use for batteries assembled from the 200 KWh module would be transmission and distribution systems capable of deferral and peak shaving. The less expensive flow assisted zinc manganese dioxide are being scaled to 50 kWh modules which will be used to firm the power supplied from intermittent renewable sources such as solar and wind.
Battery research targets applications seen on the near-term horizon and not well-suited to any existing battery technology. The 3 kWhr Flow-Assisted Nickel-Zinc Battery built and tested at the CUNY Energy Institute is intended to fill a market that will emerge in the coming years: electrical storage on the grid scale. Advanced rechargeable batteries for building or utility scales are necessary for solar and wind, as well as evolution of the smart grid or "energy internet." Energy storage technologies will enable us to increase production of domestic renewable energy sources, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and reduce our carbon footprint. The battery technologies being developed at the Energy Institute offer viables alternative to the national focus on hydrogen for energy storage and distribution by proposing to capitalize on the enhancement and development of the infrastructure for electricity production, storage and distribution.
The CUNY Energy Institute, in partnership with Rechargeable Battery Corporation (RBC) and Ultralife Corporation, is developing and constructing a water-based flow-assisted battery for grid-scale energy storage. This novel battery starts with the same low-cost materials found in disposable consumer-grade alkaline batteries, namely zinc and manganese dioxide, and then transforms the chemistry into a long-lasting, fully-rechargeable system. The result of this effort will be a 25kW rechargeable system that lasts for 5,000 cycles, costs under $100/kWh, and shows strong potential for scaling to megawatt-hour levels in grid-scale electric energy storage applications.
The CUNY Energy Institute has been developing Metacapacitors™ , a novel electrically insulating material for a new breed of capacitors that increases the capacitor's storage capability and allows for low-cost, efficient grid interfaces for applications from solid-state lighting to solar photovoltaics. The thin film capacitor can be printed in rolls similar to newspaper printing. Transistors are sealed into these capacitor films to form Metacapacitors™. The resulting Metacapacitors™ are a flexible fabric for electrical power conversion. The CUNY Energy Institute's novel research on Metacapacitors,™ led by Dr. Stephen O'Brien, received a grant of $1,568,330 from the Department of Energy's Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E). The prestigious ARPA-E grants were awarded to innovative projects that will help the US deploy next generation clean energy technologies.


text:
Undergraduates study in six of IIT's eight academic divisions. Students are encouraged—and even required—to take courses from across the various programs to complete their degrees.
If you do not have a planned area of study before entering, you can choose an Undecided path among Armour College of Engineering, College of Science, or a General Undecided.


text:
LOUISVILLE, Ky. – The editorial, television and advertising staffs from Deer & Deer Hunting are scouring the annual Archery Trade Association show to find some of the newest archery and hunting gear, so be sure to check in throughout the day for updates …
Browning Pop-Up Ground Blinds
Browning Camping has just unveiled its new line of pop-up ground blinds, consisting of four different hub-style models: the Mirage, Phantom, Phantom PC, and Powerhouse.
Research and development has been in progress for more than a year.
"We didn't want to rush the process," said Zach Scheidegger, product manager for Browning Camping. "We wanted to be sure that we surveyed the market and listened to consumers concerns so we could make this new product category top-of-the-line and better than the competition. We found that people are frustrated with many of the models currently offered; even simple things like stakes and carry bags weren't done correctly … so we've worked hard to design a line of pop-up blinds with the hunter in mind and with new features that will make ours stand out."
Structurally, the blinds are made rock-solid. All of the models use extremely strong and durable components like 600D fabric, heavier than normal mesh, aluminum hubs with engineered steel tips and pins, strong and flexible fiberglass poles, and oversized #10 zippers. Each of the corners uses extra fabric for reinforcement and bartacks for added strength and long-term durability. The Shadow Series ground binds will all be using the new, innovative Realtree Xtra pattern to help keep you concealed more than ever.
"We didn't want to just make some of the parts better … we wanted to make them all better," added Scheidegger.
Browning Camping also improved other features of the blinds when creating the Shadow Series. All of the window flaps can be adjusted to multiple positions and all of the models include a bow hanger. All of the carry bags are made with durable 600D fabric and include shoulder straps and zippered pockets. The Phantoms and Powerhouse include carry bags that have padded shoulder straps, compression straps for holding a bow or rifle, and an extra pocket for carrying your blind chair. The stakes for the Mirage are larger and stronger than most of the competitor stakes, but the stakes included for the Phantoms and Powerhouse are even longer and stronger yet, and even include a "handle" to help in placing and removing them.
In addition to these improved features, the Phantoms and Powerhouse include a "blind skirt" which helps control the scent and keeps light from coming through the bottom of the blind. Lastly, the Powerhouse includes camera windows, enough center height to be able to stand up and shoot, and a center support that can double as a mono-pod shooting stick, a feature competitors make you buy separately. With these added features, the Powerhouse can be placed in your favorite spot weeks before you hunt. With the rigid stakes and the supplied center support it will withstand wind, snow, and rain and be ready for you to climb in and hunt from the shadows.
The blinds will hit retail shelves this spring.
Info: Browning Camping
Millennium M150 Monster
Check out Millennium's new M150 Monster, designed with everything you could want in a lightweight, portable lock-on stand and ideal for the hunter on the move.
Similar to the M100, the M150 Monster features V-Brace Technology to minimize weight without compromising strength and stability. But, unlike its predecessor, the M150 Monster is designed with an adjustable seat height of 17-20 inches and 15 degrees of lean for tree-angle adjustment. The M150 Monster boasts a capacity of 300 pounds, weighs 19.5 pounds and has a large and roomy platform measuring 37×24.
M150 HangOn Stand
The Interlock Leveling System allows for the seat and platform to be leveled, making the treestand more comfortable and reliable when setting up in tricky areas or against leaning trees. Thanks to the folding ComfortMax Seat, the hunter can stand up and fold the seat against the tree providing ample space on the large platform for the perfect shot opportunity.
Another feature of the M150 Monster that makes it stand out among the rest is the CamLock Receiver system, which allows for multiple stand locations to be preset, making changing locations quick and simple. Simply secure the CamLock Receiver to the tree, hoist up the M150 Monster and then slide its aluminum stabilizing post into the receiver. You can install additional receivers in other locations so you'll always have several locations to hunt.
With the CamLock Receiver system and the Silent Hunt Design of the treestand, you can rely on it being super quiet and efficient throughout the hunt. The durable powder coat, all-aluminum finish contributes to the comfortable, quiet and easy setup.
Thanks to a quick and quiet setup and takedown, the M150 Monster is perfect for the hunter who values silence and mobility.
The Millennium M150 Monster comes with a 3-year limited warranty, as well as a TMA certified full body harness, so you not only sit comfortably, but safely on the roomy platform. This season climb high and 'hang on' in the Millennium M150 Monster HangOn Stand.
Platform: 37×24
Seat Height: 17-20 inches
Weight: 19.5 lbs
Capacity: 300 lbs
Info: Millenium Stands
Hurricane Safety System PowerStep, PowerGrab
While safety harnesses are a critical piece to hunter safety, studies reveal that 75 to 80 percent of treestand accidents occur when hunters are hanging, entering, and exiting the stand.
Hurricane Safety Systems has developed a pair of safety products designed to help prevent falls before they occur.
The PowerSTEP is a wide, platform-style step that mounts to most portable ladder-style treesteps. More than quadrupling the size of a standard tree step, the PowerSTEP provides a nonslip and more sure-footed transition when entering and exiting a treestand.
"Studies have shown that the chance of a fall is highest when a hunter is trying to climb in and out of a treestand," said David McCool, Hurricane Safety Systems Vice President of Marketing. "Many treestand falls result when a hunter attempts to pull himself into the stand by grabbing onto wet, slippery or dead branches, metal treestand parts, or steps."
To make the transition from step to stand even more safe-Hurricane has developed the PowerGRAB a generously oversized handle or grab that when solidly locked onto the tree, will not bend or slip and is capable of supporting more than 400 pounds.
"We are excited to offer these products to the hunting community this year," McCool said. "Hurricane is committed to making hunting safer. We've devoted years to product research and development and, in the process, believe we've created a new niche in the treestand safety market that will prevent serious injuries and save lives."
Info: Hurricane Safety System
Hurricane Safety Systems PowerLok
Hurricane Safety Systems, manufacturers of premium treestand safety accessories, introduces the PowerLOK.
This palm-sized tensioning and locking device provides a rock solid treestand attachment that unlike ropes and ratchet straps never needs replacing.
"Ropes and ratchet straps can weaken and stretch over time" stated Hurricane Vice President of Marketing, David McCool. "The PowerLOK replaces these straps and quickly and easily attaches to virtually every stand on the market today. With its unique tensioning system, anyone with a cordless drill or socket can easily secure their stand to the tree. It is the most advanced and secure system available."
The PowerLOK utilizes a unique technology called Calculated Radial Extraction (CRE), an industry first that produces a set amount of force or torque on the tree to assure solid attachment. A socket or cordless drill is all that is needed to securely attach your stand to the tree in seconds.
The treestand PowerLOK produces more than 400 lbs of Calculated Radial Extraction, which levels and tightens your treestand immediately during attachment without slipping or sagging into locking position.
The PowerLOK kit contains a quiet chain with a breaking strength of 3,000 pounds and universal brackets that quickly attach to most treestands.
Info: Hurricane Safety System


text:
BOSTON – Although they didn't do it with just their top snipers getting the glory, the Washington Capitals ended Bruins goaltender Tim Thomas' perfect shootout record tonight.
Speeder Alexander Semin scored one of the Capitals' goals, but the other Washington scores came off the sticks of hard-working forwards Matt Hendricks and Brooks Laich in a shootout the Caps won 3-2 to clinch a 3-2 win in the game.
Thomas dropped to 6-1 in shootouts this season.
Tyler Seguin and Patrice Bergeron scored in the shootout for Boston, but Rich Peverley was stopped by Michal Neuvirth before Laich's clinching goal.
"Well, it was entertaining," said Thomas, who stopped 21 of 23 shots in regulation and overtime. "At the end of the day it's the same as any other shootout or what have you, but I can see how the fans enjoy it."
The loss put a damper on a dramatic comeback Boston made. Trailing 2-0 in the third period, the Bruins scored a goal with 3:10 (David Krejci) and then 1:16 (Andrew Ference) remaining in the game.
With the shootout loss, the Bruins came up one point short of clinching a postseason berth. They will go for it against Saturday when they visit the New York Islanders.
▪Defenseman Adam McQuaid suffered an injury that the Bruins hopefully isn't as bad as it looked. After the game, head coach Claude Julien said McQuaid suffered a cut above his eye and wasn't feeling well so the blueliner was kept out of the game for precautionary reasons. McQuaid was hit from behind by Jason Chimera six minutes into the game. Chimera received a five-minute major for charging and a game misconduct.
Julien and several other Bruins were unanimous in the notion that while unfortunate, Chimera's hit was not a dirty play.
"Well, you know, again, when it happens to you, you also have to be honest about it," Julien said. "I think, again, he came off the bench, and he was going hard, and maybe it was a little bit reckless, but there's no doubt in my mind that it wasn't intentional. You know, McQuaid, just turned at the last second and, you know, put himself in a bit of vulnerable position. But still, like, I agree with the referee's call: it was a bit of a reckless hit, and it deserved probably a [major penalty] when you look back at the replay, and they had to make that decision. It was a tough one, but certainly wasn't intent to injure by the player, in my mind."
Capitals head coach Dale Hunter was equally understanding despite losing his player.
"Well, I'd seen it," said Hunter. "The guy turned at the last second. It's tough on the refs, I know that. But it's one of those things that you know it's tough for [Chimera] to stop, but you've got to keep playing on."
▪In McQuaid's absence, the Bruins were down to five defensemen and were still able to keep a strong offensive team to just two goals. Every Bruins defenseman exceeded 20 minutes, led by Zdeno Chara with 29:30.
"It's all this stuff to lose a guy, shorter bench that's for sure, but you just got to play the same way and keep your shifts short and keep the flow and the energy up by making good changes and smart plays and not trying to do too much or getting caught out there," Chara said.
▪With Dennis Seidenberg out as expected, Joe Corvo returned to the lineup and logged 20:03 of ice time. He posted an even rating and failed to register a shot on net.
"It felt good. I mean, nobody likes to not be able to contribute to the team and just practice every day and not get to play in games," he said. "So it felt good to be a part of the team again in a game situation."
▪Brian Rolston's point streak ended at seven games. Chara now has 3-4-7 totals in his last six games after he assisted on Krejci's goal.


text:
Half Ton Haul OffPosted in Vehicle Reviews on February 1, 2010
The year 2008 saw pickup truck sales across North America fall by around 300,000 units. But despite this, purchases of new pickups continue to be steady and were forecast to top 1.6 million units for 2009. As the truck market starts to slowly recover, we thought that a comparison of the top-selling 1/2-ton pickups was in order. So, on Canada Day, the four top- selling 1/2-ton pickups came out to Head Lake, Ontario, for some comparison testing.
While the field is small, it was obvious from our time behind the wheel that each of the manufacturers' research and development teams work hard at constantly improving the state of their trucks; qualities and components that we considered superior just two or three years ago now seemed second-rate by comparison -that's how quickly things change in this highly competitive market.
Of the trucks we tested, the Ford F-150 and Dodge Ram were the newest in terms of their most recent updates. Both were '09 models (neither brand plans any changes of any significance for the '10 model year, save the limited-production SVT Raptor version of the F-150), and both featured body, powertrain, and suspension upgrades. Both trucks have scored various wins from automotive publications and writers' groups. The Chevy Silverado that we were given to test by GM Canada was the unusual one of the bunch because of its hybrid powertrain. This gas/electric system allows this pickup to start on electric motor power only, and during traffic stops the engine shuts down to save fuel. The electric motors also kick in at highway speeds to aid in acceleration, again saving fuel. This hybrid's best feature, though, is probably the fact that operations are seamless and require nothing special from the driver.
The Toyota Tundra we had on hand was one of the first 2010 models available in Canada. It was equipped with the new 4.6L V-8 engine, which will now be the entry-level motor, and has been specifically added to offer a fuel-efficient alternative to the powerful 5.7L V-8 that powered the latest Tundra since its debut as an '07 model. Toyota is actually just the latest builder to pay special attention to fuel economy. Each of the other vehicles has reduced fuel consumption as well, most by at least 10 percent from previous generations.
We spent over 30 hours driving these four pickups hundreds of miles testing them back-to-back. This is key, because as we've learned over the years, nothing highlights the good (or bad) of one vehicle over another like driving them back-to-back. To elevate this technique to the next level, we decided to do the testing on a fixed loop of gravel/secondary road/highway circus-style, following one another and pooling our conclusions on each truck between rounds.
The testing of these four pickups was as intense as any we have ever done, but because of the small number, we felt that to try and judge categories numerically wouldn't work-the sample was too small. So with only three judges on hand, we agreed that it was best simply to report our observations rather than try and declare a winner.
Each of our test trucks was V-8 powered, with the Toyota sporting the smallest engine and the hybrid Chevy the largest at 6.0 liters. Interestingly, from a fuel perspective, the hybrid saved less than 1 mpg over the new 4.6L Toyota engine. And while this spoke to the strides made by Toyota to put a fuel-efficient motor in its Tundra, the real difference emerged when towing.
The new Ram came to us equipped with the 5.7L Hemi engine that has been doing duty in that truck for several years now. The F-150 was equipped with the 5.4L V-8, which has also been around as long as the Hemi, but which was updated with new valves and coupled to an all-new six-speed automatic transmission (the Dodge stayed with the previous generation's five-speed auto).
The Dodge is now the only truck in the group that doesn't run a six-speed automatic transmission, so it's obvious that multi-gear transmissions are playing a much larger role in power and fuel management these days. (A far cry from three-on-the-tree.) These gearboxes also show off advanced computer programming with tow/haul settings that electronically change the shift points for acceleration and also allow manual control for use with engine braking on long grades. Many of these changes are innovations that have migrated from the heavy-duty truck segment. And frankly, considering what 1/2-ton trucks tow nowadays, these changes are needed.
Chevy Silverado Hybrid
GM brought out its first-generation hybrid pickup truck in 2004, and like the early Toyota Prius, it sold in only small numbers. But unlike the Prius, it did not generate the same media coverage that has made the Prius the poster child of the retro-hippie set. Strange, that. But, like Toyota and Ford, GM is committed to hybrid propulsion and understands the need to keep building vehicles like this pickup, which in many ways is more important than a passenger car. Small cars abound, but trucks have to remain large -it's their function-so what better vehicle to be built as a hybrid?
Equipped with a standard 6.0L Vortec V-8, this truck also generates its own power by using gravity each time the truck slows-recharging the 300-volt batteries that will then feed the voltage back to the electric motors after the next stop. Of course there is a bit more to it than that, but the key idea is that this hybrid system recaptures energy that the truck produces anyway; energy that in other vehicles is wasted as the byproducts of combustion.
Backing the engine is GM's Electrically Variable Transmission (EVT), which uses a 300-volt nickel-metal hydride Energy Storage System (ESS) to save and provide power. This EVT is a unique setup of two 60kW electric motors, three planetary gear sets, and four traditional hydraulic wet clutches. This arrangement is continuously in variable operation, offering the greatest efficiencies at any given moment under any specific load.
From a standstill, the Silverado launches and drives up to 30 mph on electricity alone, then the 6.0L gas engine takes over; but this V8 engine also has Active Fuel Management (AFM) and late intake valve closing (LIVC) technology, which allows it operate in "V-4" mode once it's reached highway speeds. To help it stay in V-4 mode as long as possible, the EVT also offers the equivalent of a 30hp boost of electric power when needed at high speeds. Again, it's all about physics-minimize friction, use gravity to make electricity, and maintain motion using the least possible amount of energy.
Earlier this year, we drove this hybrid on a highway run to Ottawa from Brampton, Ontario. It was clear but cold at around 5 degrees (F); there were five riders in the truck, and the bed was stuffed with one university-bound passenger's belongings (including a brilliant red beanbag chair bungeed on top of the pile). I set the cruise at 75 mph and made the trip of 312 miles on 19.8 gallons of regular fuel-or 15.8 mpg. The return trip data was almost identical.
With some hybrids currently on the market, towing is an issue. Specifically, they can't. Not so with the GM system. This tranny will handle up to 5,900 pounds using the variable electric/gas operation and fixed-gear ratios in the transmission for heavier loads. Interestingly, much of this technology and build experience was gained from GM's development of hybrid bus drivetrains. Equipped with an optional engine block heater, our test unit priced out at $50,965.
Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
In 1932, a sculptor named Avard Fairbanks met with Walter P. Chrysler and tried to sell him a bust of a bighorn ram as a Dodge symbol. Fairbanks explained that the animal was "King of the Trail" in his presentation, but Chrysler was unconvinced until Fairbanks added, "Besides, if you saw one on the trail in front of you, you'd think, 'Dodge!'" Chrysler immediately agreed. In 1981, the ram became more than a corporate symbol and the Dodge Ram pickup was born.
The most recent generation of the Ram debuted last year as a 2009 model, and we first had a chance to drive one in California, where, like many places, the Dodge Ram has serious fans. Like the guy who ran up to us in the Starbucks parking lot to show off his Ram logo tattoo, or the kid who on Christmas Day circled the two-tone Crew Cab Ram we were driving, finally commenting, "Man, that's pretty."
What our tattooed friend was reacting to was the subtle yet powerful redesign of the Ram "big-rig" look that first dropped in '94. With some rounding of the fenders and a forward-tilt to the cross-hair grille, the truck has kept its silhouette, yet by pulling the lights back over the new one-piece bumper, it's taken on a fast, rakish, slippery look. But without a doubt the biggest difference is in the interior design. This new interior features redesigned bolstered seats of soft-touch material in two and even three colour patterns (rather than hard gray plastic). A new center console, upper and lower gloveboxes, and a sculpted dashboard feature chrome, leather, and cloth accents-including items like real saddle stitching across the dash. Other available options include power adjustable pedals, double the number of previous storage spaces, and first-time items like heated and cooled front seats, heated rear seats, and a heated steering wheel.
In a departure from traditional full-size pickup design, Dodge has given its new Ram a coil-spring rear suspension, which has changed the ride of the solid rear axle for the better. Over washboard roads, the coils soak up the impact, and the rear wheels don't snap and dance as they did with the leaf springs.
Another key element in this new Ram design is the RamBox-there are two of them. These are two weatherproof, lockable storage bins that run the length of the 5-foot by 7-inch box and which are as wide as the wheelwell, creating a space big enough for a full set of golf clubs. The inside width of the truck bed remains at that magical four-foot number, despite the intrusion of these storage spaces. And the way the lids are integrated into the box looks pretty nice. This item is an option on the Crew Cab only.
This sort of striking design feature is a Dodge hallmark, and frankly no one has been better at mining its history for model ideas. Look at the past few years, where Dodge has come up with variations of its Ram such as the Daytona, the Rumble Bee, and the Power Wagon.
Model-year 2010 looks to be a carryover year for the Ram, but with the new body, interior, and a good selection of components, they are in good shape. Rams are available with the 3.7L V-6 and four-speed automatic, a 4.7L V-8 with a five-speed automatic, and the 5.7L Hemi with the five-speed automatic. Four rear axle ratios are available, three bed lengths, and three cabs: Regular Cab, Quad Cab, and Crew 1500. With the optional 3.92:1 axle gearing, leather-trimmed bucket seats, Class IV Hitch and Protection Group, our test Ram sported a sticker price of $47,565.
Ford F-150 Super Crew Lariat
The newest Ford F-series pickup is 61 years removed from the original 1948 F-1, but it still carries many of the forward-thinking features that first model offered, such as a larger cab, improved suspension, better payload, and extra driver comforts. Sticking to a program of innovation and improvement over many generations of F-series trucks helps explain Ford's decades-long sales success with this model.
For 2009, the F-series sported several key changes. Payload and towing capacity were increased, supported by a new frame designed with new high-strength steel. To support these weights, Ford opted to add longer (six inches) and wider (3-inch) leaf springs that improve lateral stiffness and offer a better ride, particularly under load. Compare this to GM's 2.5-inch-wide leaves or Dodge's new coil-spring rear suspension. Also upgraded are the tires-new LT (Light Truck designated) tires have stiffer sidewalls for better towing and payload support.
The Ford's new cab is also better insulated for noise and is supported entirely on isolated rubber mounts that make it more comfortable than previous versions. As a comparison, we recently test drove a new Ford Flex (that cleverly disguised mini-van), and after driving the F-150 on public roads in the Michigan countryside, we were struck by how similar they were-firm, smooth, and quiet.
The Ford's quiet interior is complemented with a nice range of driver comforts in the newly appointed base cabin package. Another high-end trim level called the Platinum has been added; sliding in above the King Ranch, this brings to seven the number of appearance packages that is now offered for the F-series. While largely unchanged from 2004, the new cabin (with tweaks) leaves Ford's interiors competitive-and no one else offers this array of interior trim packages.
Among the best of Ford's latest innovations for the F-150 is the integrated trailer brake controller first introduced in the Super Duty three years ago. Now available in the 1/2-ton, this feature will be of particular interest to the more than 50 percent of owners who tow regularly (GM has this now, but Dodge and Toyota still do not). This F-150 also adds another new towing feature-a Trailer Sway Control that can sense yaw motion in the trailer (fishtailing) and apply precise braking and less power to bring the truck and trailer back into line.
In keeping with the current trend of fuel conservation, Ford invested a considerable amount of development dollars in powertrain and fuel economy improvements for the new truck. The net result is fuel economy gains as high as 12 percent, versus the previous generation (equipped with the high-volume three-valve 5.4L V-8). Including the other engines, fuel economy across the line averages out at around eight percent.
Other engineering that has made these gains possible includes a new six-speed automatic transmission and an optional 3.15:1 rear axle. These in tandem contribute to a 4- to 6-percent fuel economy improvement over the old four-speed gearbox. With a slew of options, including the tires, skidplating, Max Trailer Tow package (with brake controller), power trailer mirrors, pickup-box and tailgate access steps, rear-view camera, and Lariat trim package, our test F-150 listed an MSRP of $53,499.
Toyota Tundra Double-Cab
The current Toyota Tundra is the second generation to sport that name-but it's the third attempt by Toyota to enter the full-size North American pickup market in a meaningful way. Who remembers the T-100? Well, success is really no longer a question-they have established a foothold in the market. Now it's more a question of what they will do with it. Specifically, when will Toyota ramp up to offer what the others offer?
To recap: The second-generation Tundra launched as a 2007 model to much fanfare and managed to nearly double its sales from the previous version. Part of that success was because of a new engine-the snorting 5.7L V8 with 381 horsepower, which outgunned its competition. But as a very real lesson of "timing is everything," that advantage turned out to be short-lived. With the upward trend in gas prices in 2008 and the subsequent collapse of the auto market (a 27-percent overall decline in pickup sales in 2008 alone), the Tundra (like all the trucks) went for a spill after its honeymoon debut.
As the '09 model year approached, the new generation of Ford and Dodge pickups magnified one of the problems confronting the Tundra-namely, a lack of engine choices. And while originally it offered the i-Force 4.7L that made 271 horsepower and 313 lb-ft of torque coupled to a five-speed automatic, the older engine had fallen behind its competitors and was only a stop-gap measure. This observation makes even more sense when looking at the fuel economy ratings of the 4.7L, which turned out to be poorer than the company's predictions for the new and larger 5.7L.
With the release of the 2010 Tundra, Toyota has now addressed the problem. The 4.7L is gone in favor of a brand-new 4.6L V-8 engine that's now the base-model standard. Unlike the old 4.7 though, this new motor actually offers benefits for its smaller displacement. In addition, Toyota has packaged two new versions of the Tundra around this engine. This engine's performance is attributed to two technologies that are new to the Tundra. The first is a Cooled Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) System which reduces smog-forming emissions and improves overall fuel efficiency. The second is an Acoustic Control Induction System (ACIS) that optimizes power and torque output. These technologies help the engine produce 310 horsepower and 327 lb-ft of torque, while still offering a combined fuel consumption rating of close to 20 mpg. Compared to the outgoing 4.7L engine, this is a 12-percent increase in horsepower and an 11-percent increase in fuel economy.
The new engine is now coupled to a six-speed automatic transmission instead of the old five-speed. So while this powertrain combination is the key change for 2010, Toyota has also done a bit of housekeeping (so to speak) on the truck itself, with some modest fascia changes and added safety and standard features.
As mentioned, Toyota is fully aware that it doesn't quite compete with the Detroit Three pickup builders in the number of choices it offers. Then again, it took GM, Ford, and Dodge decades to develop their portfolio of components and build trucks that were aimed at a customer's specific needs and geographic location. Toyota is now working on that-though perhaps not as quickly as it would if the economy was more robust. Still, added to the equipment list for 2010 are an adjustable headlamp leveling system, fog lamps as standard, more models with towing mirrors as standard, and an upgraded navigation system that responds to voice commands.
Convenience equipment this year includes models with standard features such as map lamps, an auto dimming rear view mirror with integrated compass, an integrated garage door opener, and/or a fold-down seatback table fitted to the front passenger seat.
Model choices for the '10 model year will cover a choice of three cabs: The three-passenger Regular Cab, five or six-passenger Double Cab, and CrewMax cab configurations, and 5 1/2-, 6 1/2-, or 8.1-foot beds. With the new engine factored in, Toyota is now claiming a choice of 15 models-five 4x2 Tundras and 10 4x4 models. Trim levels include "Work Truck" up to a new loaded Platinum 5.7L model.
We had a chance to drive several hundred miles on a run to Kingston, Ontario, and then back to Brampton. Our combined average fuel consumption (as shown on the instant readout in the truck) was 18.4 mpg. Powerwise, we noted that the transmission works in concert with the engine (by downshifting two gears when called upon) to build speed, yet at the high end lopes along at minimal rpm-saving fuel even at 75 mph. With the optional Upgrade Package and rear step bumper, our Tundra Double Cab priced out at $38,859, making it the most economical truck in our evaluation. (We'll have more on the 2010 Tundra in our 2010 Pickup Truck of the Year test, appearing in next month's issue.)
Driving: Gravel Roads
Gravel roads are great for three things: evaluating cabin noise levels, assessing steering feel, and driving dirt into every possible crevice on the truck. Thanks to recent rains, we experienced all three equally.
The consensus among our testers was that the Chevy and Ford were the quietest of these trucks. Not just on overall road noise, but they also deadened the pinging in the wheelwells from the gravel hits. On pavement, tire noise was low and with both engines at idle, it was almost impossible to tell they were running. (With the hybrid, that's a bit deceiving because at stops, the engine stops as well.)
Steering feel was good on all the trucks, but again Ford and Chevy seem to have it over the other two with a more controlled and confident feel. Certainly with the Ford, the new longer wheelbase adds to the overall ride quality-the trade-off is that it increases its turning radius. Inside though, the Ford puts this added length to use as rear cabin space, adding almost six inches of floor space. For spaciousness, Ford has it over the others.
It was interesting to see that the 2010 Toyota Tundra we tested featured a fold-down cargo bed step, an add-on that mimics the Ford step. It's good to see that Toyota reacts quickly to the changing market, not necessarily waiting until the next-generation update to make build changes.
Driving: Off-Road
That said, it was noted in the off-road portion of our test that of all the trucks, the Tundra has the most play between the box and cab and could use some stiffening up. With the rain pelting (and mosquitoes attacking), we attempted our off-road course in two-wheel drive, First gear with each of the trucks, but in slick mud, we were soon stuck. Still, we noted that the mechanical locker that the Chevy has in its rear differential provided the quickest hook-up before we switched into four-wheel drive. From here, each truck preformed adequately, but the Ford's turning radius once again required that we back up in tight switchbacks; with the other trucks, we didn't need to.
Also on our off-road route, we noted that the Tundra and the F-150 persisted in putting their trailer light connections below the rear bumper. We managed to bend both. We think these belong above, or in, the bumper-as the Dodge and Chevy have them placed.
Our test trailer was a dual-axle, landscape-type trailer with an unladen weight of 2,400 pounds. We loaded two ATVs on it that we had on hand for another test-a Yamaha Kodiak 450 and a 475cc Honda Foreman, and these weighed in at 629 and 639 pounds, respectively. So with the trailer included, we put together a modest tow test weight of 3,668 pounds-respectable for any of these trucks to tow, but far from a real workout. The towing capacity on the new Ford, for instance, has increased to 11,300 pounds, while payload has risen to 3,030 pounds as a direct result of a new frame designed with new high-strength steel (which, despite its increased load-bearing ability, weighs 100 pounds less than the last-generation frame). Our trailer was equipped with "surge brakes," meaning that it didn't require an onboard brake controller-but it's worth noting that while aftermarket units have been the norm for decades, Ford and Chevy now offer integrated controls installed at the factory.
While towing this trailer, once again the power and wheelbase of the Ford and Chevy proved to be the best combinations. The Dodge lacked only in its gearing, where a long Second gear tended to bog a bit on hills while accelerating. While it handled the weight, the Toyota used all its power, and the transmission worked hard to keep pace-an obvious trade-off for the improved fuel economy. On the Chevy hybrid, neither was affected. With its 6.0L Vortec engine, it pulled with strength and confidence, and the electric motors even have enough power on their own to move the truck and trailer from a standing stop on electric power only. As for rear suspension performance, we concluded that our modest load wasn't heavy enough to highlight any significant differences in ride and handling characteristics between the leaf springs found on the Ford, Chevy, and Toyota and the Dodge's coils and links.
As for design, we try to be practical in our evaluations, but we are as swayed as any buyer by a truck's looks. And while there isn't a mutt in the bunch, we have to admit that the current Ram is a very pretty truck, inside and out.


text:
Alan Zemaitis.... a SIX on the Wonderlic test during the combine.
Even PITT's Josh Lay scored better with 13.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Bowser wrote:Alan Zemaitis.... a SIX on the Wonderlic test during the combine.
Even PITT's Josh Lay scored better with 13.
Stoosh wrote:One thing that drives me insane is this talk from some of these Steeler fans about taking Michael Robinson to replace Randle-El. What a crock.
First off, Robinson right now projects as a RB more than anything else. In fact, I've heard some reports - particularly some of the discussion on NFL Network during the combine - that Robinson's got more of a chance of being a QB in the NFL than he does a WR. So let's recap...we've got a guy who was a QB and WR in college, but scouts are saying his best chance at a future in the NFL is at a position he never played in college. That doesn't sound like a guy who I want to spend a draft pick on to play WR.
A few things some of these dolts need to remember...
1) Just because someone played both WR and QB in college doesn't mean they can do it in the pros.
2) Randle-El was drafted exclusively as a wide receiver and the gadget role evolved from there. The team DID NOT draft him with the trick play role in mind - at least, it wasn't any of the primary reasons they drafted him.
3) If you're in the business of spending a draft pick on a player to specifically fill a gadget play role, do me a favor and join my fantasy football league.
4) I'll indulge these people for a minute. Look at Robinson's body type and his mobility and then project that into the slot-receiver role that Randle-El played. The one thing that made Randle-El a solid slot receiver was his quickness and agility. That kind of quickness and agility exists in people who are 5'7", 170 like Randle-El was. It's not the same kind of quickness that a guy who goes 6'1", 225 has.
In other words, Robinson would get lit up like friggin' Christmas tree. That would be like asking Warrick Dunn to come to Pittsburgh to take over Jerome Bettis's role.
Draftnik wrote:On ESPN Insider McShay said Zemaitis got a 9. He claims the Young 6 score was correct, but the NFL allowed him to retake the test for a 15.
On NFL Network Mayock said Zamaitis ran over a 4.6 on a fast indoor track @ PSU's pro day. He probably ran himself out of the first day. He did say they have some walk on receiver that ran very fast and is a special teams demon and may be drafted. Hali solidified his first round status. Most of the other guys ran slowly, didn't do enough 225 reps, and jumped poorly. Robinson said he wants to play QB, but he didn't throw well in his workout.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


text:
"PlanetSide 2 launched this week. It is a free-to-play FPS MMO with battles on an epic scale, not unlike CCP's Dust 514. PlanetSide 2 is a game that would work extremely well on consoles, so why isn't it available for Sony's PS3?
Well, the graphics."
Current generation graphics looks much better than this !
Seriously? Really, cos these images (and the gameplay videos) are really impressive. Much better than current gen FPSs.
Look at Halo 4 ! Which one is better, seriously ?!
Halo looks good, no denying that. But not this good and it's no where near the scale of Planetside 2.
I expect much better than Planetside 2 graphics on next gen. Even launch titles (that always look worse when compared to later titles) should look way better.
What they miss is that the game scales.
Lower performance machines could run this no problem, just with lower graphics settings.
It would probably make more sense to wait for PS4 and then present this game in it's true glory on that platform though... in my opinion.
Considering it's an MMO....uh, that's pretty darn good.
not to mention its f2p... pretty amazing graphics if you ask me.
The screenshots don't do this game justice. If you can play the game MAXED on your PC, only then will you understand the Scope, size, and Epicness of the world
Considering it's an FPS-MMO with approx 2,000 players per a continent, with several hundred square kilometers per a continent...
It's very DAMN good looking!
Just be glad that we have something. Kids these day don't appreciate many things, and this game is free.
Guys let's remember here. Planet side 2 pulls of these amazing graphics while allowing up to 2000 players playing simultaneously on a massive map with tons of vehicles, customized suits, and basically lots of assets.
Well ok then. That's impressive.
I was about to say the graphics are nothing special.
Yea, been playing this game for months. Even if it had launch ps2 and xbox graphics I doubt current gen consoles would be able to run the game playable with the amount of scale and players required.
Hell they can't even get past 24 players in bf3 so how would they be able to run a map the size of NYC with thousands of players?
Also it cost a total of ZERO dollars...
There are much better shots around the internet, also this game has a massive massive world with 2000 characters and vehicles.
I fully agree with you. PS3/Xbox360 are capable of those visuals and Wii U can do that easily. Nothing next gen about those screen shots.
I agreed because you're right but i bubbled you down for calling people an idiot on an internet forum about video games. xD
lol disagrees.
k nevermind he didn't call somebody an idiot on a forum about video games and that isn't a personal attack on somebody
This is a clown comment. I've been in a sprawling battle with over two hundred players. We're talking epic huge here, like over 40 tanks and planes and hundreds of infantry clashing all around me.
This game makes BF 3 looks like Call of Duty. And it's free.
this game looks beautiful people who are saying this game looks nothing special are idiots. For the scale of the game and pulling those graphics is IMPRESSIVE and graphics which current gen or next gen probably wont be able to pull off.
This shows those who have played the game and those that cant.... hahhahah
Here's a better gallery from the beta: http://imgur.com/a/kC4bd
Planetside2 itself isn't a taxing game visually. It does demand a strong CPU though, due to the scale of the game.
When it comes to next-gen, I'd expect launch titles to have similar visuals at 1080p.
Yea it doesnt tax the game visually... until you MAX the Settings and put it at the highest resolution.
dude your talking out of your ass.
Don't compare current games to this 2000 players game.
Does halo have 2000 players, physx, bullet drop, 64 Square Kilometer(25 sq mile) maps?, day/night 24/7 non stop battles in a persistant world?
What current game are you comparing it to?
Oh yeah your waiting for a new console.
This shows the power of pc and also shows how sony can make a great mmo. Hence my pc/ps3 soon ps4 preference.
Now tell me about your $60 hallway shooters with less things to do again?
Considering that Planetside 2 is an MMO, it's probably 100X the size of Halo 4, or some absurd number like that. It looks pretty damn nice for what it is.
1. Those are Not Ultra Settings!
I have Planetside 2 and have been playing since the Beta.....those pictures are not on Ultra with all the bells and whistles on!
Also the video they supplied is total crap! check the video I have at night and see all the lighting effects!
sure PS2 is NO battlefield 3 on Ultra but PS2 looks better than that! so check the link out for a Nice comparison of PS2 on High vs. Ultra and see the real difference! 1:38 mark u get good side by side comparisons.
2. The stupid editor never mentioned that Planetside 2 has 2000 players per map which is a MAJOR reason why Planetside 2 is not on consoles!
I'm not bad mouthing the consoles but Planetside 2 is a PC Game designed to take advantage of the PC and as of right now I know no console that can have this level of graphics and 2000 players per map!
Surely Next Gen consoles will be more than capable as Planetside 2 is such an awesome game that should be enjoyed by all.
How are you getting ultra? High is currently the best setting available for me. It will look awesome in motion once they enable PhysX.
Technically 360 and PS3 are last gen now lol
Halo 4 has 2000 players on screen at once and looks like that?
If you only look at the pictures, I agree consoles would be able to do that. But behind the pictures are some serious, raw scale. Maybe PS3 could do it. Not 100% sure, but maybe.
Honestly I don't think any console could render this scale at 720p and 32 players. This is the first game I played on my new PC that made my jaw drop. The jump from console BF3 to pc BF3 was awesome, but this game is even more impressive.
I own MAG, and that holds about 256 player. Planet Side 2 take it to the next level.
I think the scale in itself has already been done on console: Just Cause 2, Fuel etc. PS3 also has MAG and a few other MMOs that do sit quite well on the console. I don't see why at least the PS3 wouldn't be able to run at least a slightly reduced version. Another thing: My lap top is able to run Planetside on decent quality. My lap top is fairly powerful, but it's still not quite a PS3.
Its not so much the visuals as the fact that you can fight with thousands of people at the same time with gunships and tanks and stuff. And there's no lag as far as I have experienced. And it's free.
first off you havent even seen how big the map is. Thirdly a ps3 couldnt run this game even on lowest settings.
Looks much better in motion
There's actually a video they've done too, link in that story. You should watch it!
Yeah, they should have turned off motion blur before taking screen shots while playing. Makes it look like it has lazy Bethesda PS3 AA.
would be nice if they had hi res screens shots too. Im playing at 1440p and it looks sweet.
The graphics are pretty impressive, though having seen what the Unreal 4 engine is capable of I would expect PS4 visuals to be closer to this:
There's a lot of powerful hardware out there Sony could take advantage of...
Lol, sorry man. My high end pc STRUGGLES running that same tech demo at high settings. You may get half that quality on the PS4/720. Maybe.
Oh. Fair play. Thanks for the info. Perhaps I should reconsider my former statement... :-/
That demo is running on a GTX680 1080p @ 30 fps and Unreal Engine 4 is built for next gen consoles so it's possible it will look that good. If history repeats itself next-gen is gonna be able to compete with High-end PC's just like in 2005.
You honestly think for next-gen consoles they're going to put in a dedicated GPU that can be optimized to run graphics parity equivalent to a GTX 680?
Dream on, dude. With Sony's current financial state and Microsoft looking to cash in on casuals, we'll be lucky if we get consoles that can output visuals equivalent to a GTX 580, much less a GTX 680.
Don't get me wrong, I would LOVE to see the next consoles run that well (I'll be buying either a PS4 or 720, depending on the hardware) but graphics are not improving as fast as they used to.
With the resolutions we're running at (1080p and up), you can double the power of your graphics card and only see a tiny bit of a performance boost (10-20fps?). Normally, it takes about a 4x boost in power to double the visual fidelity at around 1080p.
Back when consoles were pushing 480p/i, all you were doubling was graphical detail, But now, new consoles are dealing with more resolution and higher frame rate demands. It takes a ton of power.
If they want to compete performance-wise with current high-end PCs I could see the next gen consoles not appearing on the scene until late 2014. If they launch next year MS/Sony would have to take quite a big price hit for them not to cost upwards of ~$800 (assuming they perform relative to a home built $1600 PC), if the production cost doesn't reduce for a substantial time (my the next christmas) games would have to cost upwards of $75 to cover the loss taken on unit console sales (they would need to drop them to ~$350 to not lose out on market share). The Wii-U is pretty dire price-performance and Nint still take a loss for each console, it'd be so much worse for a high-end device. Good games still sell on current platforms too.
I see what you're saying, but even if they wait another year, PC's will still evolve 2 more generations (graphics cards and cpu's tend to have 2 gen per year), so really it wouldn't help them cost wise. No matter when they release it, they will probably be 2-4 years behind the most current tech.
BUT, that doesn't really matter. Even at 2 years behind, they technology that will be available is phenomenal.
I don't think they'll raise game costs, and people are already complaining about the 60 dollar mark.
Yeah that's why I said if they wanted to compete against current high-end. They probably won't, they will probably have graphics chips relative to what a 560Ti is capable of thereabouts and another custom memory/cpu configuration (cheaper for loads of identical machines than how PC components have to conform for plug & play). That would leave them with a reasonable amount of loss per console and a fast sales surge due to a low retail price ($300 seems to be the golden number) so games wouldn't have to be too pricey but they will suck, technologically, after 2-3 years like this gen.
I do think the step up in performance by them waiting till 680GTX quality graphics are viable though, games designed solely for tessellated rendering allow optimizations and detail that can't be put in a game that'll also run on DX9 (well, it can, but it takes loads more time from the artists and level editors)
If one company waits, and the other releases earlier - there should be a giant performance difference.
I agree with your second comment entirely.
Although I'm thinking they'll go along with something like a GTX 480 before a GTX 560Ti. They'll probably go as cheap as possible while trying to boast as much raw performance power as possible.
This is what we should expect from Sony and MS next gen console but I going to to be bluny here and ssay that I don not expect much improvement next gen from this gen, the only yhing I see both console adding is more RAM.
Sony will continue to use Blu Rey and they will upgrade the cell,as much as3rd party developers do not want to put work into it Sony will no throw away miilions of dollars on R&D.
MS will use there own disk format, sorta of like Nintendo and I expect a complete over haul with heavy PC specs.
Most will disagree with you. They'll think you're just a PC elitist fanboy, but I actually agree.
Just look at the rumours for the hardware planned to be in PS4/X720 - not confirmed, obviously, and while the specs are good they don't seem particularly ground-breaking on top of what is currently available for PCs.
It's a shame, but tech is moving at such a speed these days it's hard to think they could do anything else.
Pretty Much, new but standard GPU to optimize and hopefully about 8x the RAM.
Killzone 3 looks way better.
This what PS4 games should look like:
Thats why im holding off on buying a Wii U because i believe that the PS4 and 720 will be a lot more powerful than it at the same price point.
Not saying that the Wii U is a bad console it does have a unique controller that should radically change the way some games are played but it wont be anywhere as powerful as the next consoles by Sony and Microsoft.
but Killzone is a corridor ala FF13 while Planetside 2 has multiplayer maps at a scale that we have never seen before. BTW both games are from Sony anyway.
Show me Killzone 3 with 2k players playing at the same time Rashid.
Killzone 3 doesn't look all that impressive though, particularly the textures which can be pretty low res. In a like for like comparison with another linear PC game like Metro 2033, the difference is massive.
Like many have already mentioned, this game can support 2000 players at once. Add that many players to even the best looking console game and graphics go through the floor.
Oh god, just look at the ground textures, the textures on the right side, the textures on the distance!
Tell me that blurry mess is better than this, what's worse is that killzone 3 is a corridor shooter and planetside 2 is a MMO with 2000 players on the same map and a map bigger thant the whole killzone campaign. Killzone 3 is a low res mess, it looks "good" to some because of the excessive motion blurr and the ugly instagram color fliter
Now tell me with a straight face that this
Looks better,oh and also your image after that, bf3 already looks better
There are better screens but I want to be fair
To be honest that doesnt look impressive at all.
But too bad it is. On my pc it may just be the best looking game I've seen since BF3 or Crysis. When completely maxed, Planetside 2 is unbelievable, especially with 2000 players and 50 square-mile maps.
So many people talking shit in this comment section. It's disgusting.
Its needs a release on ps4 imo theres a real chance of this being a runner against the halo genre from what ive played on PC.
Killzone 2 looks way Better than this
The screenshots doesnt do the game justice. You'd have to see it moving. All the lighting, shadows, bullets/lasers, explosions, etc...
Though there are areas in the game in low res or just havent loaded yet.
The new bug right now that's really annoying is the proxy chat screwing up. You end up hearing people from far away instead of just 100m away.


text:
Service-Learning and Life Philosophies
Great Resources for Teaching
from the November 2009 YES! Education Connection Newsletter
Read the newsletter: Teaching What Matters: Preparing Your Students for the Real World
Here are two dynamic organizations that offer your students opportunities and engaging resources to express and act on what they believe. Encourage your students to take on a service-learning project or submit a personal essay to "This I Believe."
:: National Youth Leadership Council
:: This I Believe in the Classroom
National Youth Leadership Council
SEE WEBSITE: National Youth Leadership Council
What does it take to transform young people from disinterested students to engaged citizens and community leaders? According to the National Youth Leadership Council, the answer is service-learning.
For over 25 years, NYLC has been a leader in the service-learning movement, dedicating itself to the potential of young people through civic engagement and active leadership. Sponsoring leadership workshops, hosting conferences, and encouraging schools to adopt service-learning into their curriculum, NYLC seeks to redefine the transition into adulthood through active community engagement.
Service-learning isn't just something students do; it's a way of teaching. Learn the basics of service-learning from an industry veteran, plus gain insights on components of successful service-learning projects and how to get started.
Real examples are often the best way to ignite a student's "a-ha!" button. Visit this NYLC link for an abundance of service-learning project ideas, ideal for a range of ages and grades. Your students will be inspired by these examples from their peers across the country. From wetland cleanup to redecorating a children's hospital waiting room, the possibilities are endless.
Feeling that your school is ready to commit to making service-learning part of your educational practice? Join the Generator School Network to learn from and interact with K-12 teachers and administrators who are passionate about service-learning. You will receive tremendous support from NYLC and colleagues in improving your service-learning reach and impact. Membership fees are waived for the first 100 schools that join.
Be sure to check out the 21st Annual National Service-Learning Conference in San Jose California, March 24-27, 2010. Experience service-learning through a thought leader series, project presentations and displays, and networking with teachers and students from all over the world.
This I Believe in the Classroom
People learn from their mistakes. Miracles do happen. Friends are a person's greatest influence. What is it that you and your students believe in?
Edward R. Murrow hosted the first "This I Believe" radio program in the 1950s where Americans, famous or not, shared five-minute essays about their personal life philosophies. So popular, the program developed into a series of essays and soon after into curriculum aimed at teenagers to share their outlook on the world.
NPR and This I Believe Inc. have teamed up to bring back the essay project, asking Americans of any age to share their beliefs in a 400-500 word essay. They also have introduced "This I Believe in the Classroom," founded on the success and positive experience of teachers using "This I Believe" as an educational tool.
Visit for:
- Curriculum (middle and high school, and university): New curricula adapted separately for middle school, high school, and college students includes a step-by-step guide to writing a personal essay, as well as offering activities to walk them through the process of figuring out exactly what it is that they believe in.
- Brochure and poster: A colorful classroom poster and informational brochure promote "This I Believe" activities and tips for writing your own personal essay.
- Educator guide: This helpful document provides answers and information to the most frequently asked questions on how to submit an essay to "This I Believe."


text:
Grandeur Fifth Avenue Plate Dummy with Fifth Avenue Knob in Antique Pewter
Grandeur 822002 Fifth Avenue Plate Dummy with Fifth Avenue Knob in Antique Pewter
The crisply tailored look of the Fifth Avenue Plate has a universal appeal that works well with almost any home. Combined with our Fifth Avenue knob, the look is surprisingly sophisticated, yet primitive. All Grandeur products are created from solid (not plated) forged brass.
Non functioning Door Knob and chosen longplate for one side of door, dummy spindle and mounting screws
Catalog 1
Catalog 2
Catalog 3
Finish: Antique Pewter
Material: Brass
In 1980, Nostalgic Warehouse, formerly Hardware+Plus, began providing high-quality door hardware to the public. Beginning as an antique dealers dream of manufacturing stylish hardware with quality that is sure to last a lifetime.
As vintage inspired hardware began to trend, the business grew from an idea to an industry leader. Nostalgic Warehouse provides vintage style door hardware to Hollywood art directors and set directors. Featured in films such as Casper, Jumanji, Legends of the Fall, Men in Black, Sommersby, The Client, The Firm, The Ghost, and the Darkness, while also appearing in T.V. shows like Chicago Fire, Boardwalk Empire, Gotham, and Vampire Diaries.
The difference is what we use. Built on a foundation of excellence, Nostalgic Warehouse provides only the highest quality products with unmatched attention to detail. Other companies utilize cheaper materials like cast or stamped brass and glass instead of real crystal. At Nostalgic Warehouse, where are committed to using only craftsman-quality materials (hot-forged brass and real crystal) in manufacturing.
The excellent attention to detail provided in our product is passed on to our customers by offering finishes to last a lifetime and the customer service to back it up. Add the perfect finishing touch to your home by purchasing your door hardware from Nostalgic Warehouse.
Brand: Grandeur
Function: DUMMY
Function #: 20
ADA Rated: NO
Door Handing: Non-handed
Long Plate Height (in): 7.25
Long Plate Width (in): 2.5
Knob Diameter (in): 2.25
Projection (in): 2.66
Cross Bore (in): 2.125
Collections: Fifth Avenue
Units: Single
Door-thickness: 1 3/8" - 1 3/4"
Matching Accessories: NA
Solid forged brass construction for strength and durability
Dummy: Ideal for doors that require only push/pull function – no latch or lock.
Pre-mounted knobs and levers for easy installation
Hand assembled in the USA
Lifetime Mechanical Warranty
Design Code: FAVFAV
Finish Code: AP
Function Code: SD
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the very best experience. Please click Accept Cookies to continue to use the site.
Pellentesque de fermentum mollis comodous an loremous
Sign Up for exclusive updates, new arrivals
and insider-only discounts


text:
War and Peace, Book 12: 1812 (FULL Audio book) by Leo Tolstoy ch 9-16
War and Peace, Book 01: 1805 (FULL Audio book) by Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) Translated by Louise Shanks Maude (1855-1939) and Aylmer Maude (1858-1938) War and Peace (Russian: Война и мир, Voyna i mir; in original orthography: Война и миръ, Voyna i mir") is an epic novel by Leo Tolstoy, first published from 1865 to 1869 in Russki Vestnik, which tells the story of Russian society during the Napoleonic Era. It is usually described as one of Tolstoy's two major masterpieces (the other being Anna Karenina) as well as one of the world's greatest novels. War and Peace offered a new kind of fiction, with a great many characters caught up in a plot that covered nothing less than the grand subjects indicated by the title, combined with the equally large topics of youth, age and marriage. While today it is considered a novel, it broke so many novelistic conventions of its day that many critics of Tolstoy's time did not consider it as such. Tolstoy himself considered Anna Karenina (1878) to be his first attempt at a novel in the European sense. (Summary by Wikipedia) Note: The novel is split up in 17 books. This is the recording of book one, which covers events in the year 1805


text:
03-17-2011 08:11 PM - edited 03-17-2011 08:17 PM
LabVIEW has brought me great joy!
I have not learned C, C + +, VC, VB and so on. But the LabVIEW help me become a programmer. Get rid of the hardware design and software design has brought me trouble.
I created my own expense (private) Profile: LabVIEW - Northern Inn
I used to learn all the time to understand the LabVIEW.
Do not know leave LabVIEW, I can do?
I love LabVIEW.
I started using LabVIEW from 2003. I was working as a trainee in one of the s/w company where i struggled to learn the "Pearl" language. I did my enggineering in electronics and never understood the text language C and C++ during my academics. It was tough on mypart and i never wanted to be a software engineer (which is a big trend in India as of now).
I was interviewed by an alliance member and was recruited where i almost failed in delivering my first project. After couple of months somehow i managed to provide a module code to my PL (may be it was an opportunity to prove myself) which is accepted "AS IS" and i managed to deliver a couple of project in a short time frame.
This made me to show some more interest in LabVIEW, learning and sharing with people. Now i am a certified LabVIEW architect and still learning new things on a daily basis.
I just wanted to thank everyone again and give you a quick update - it just warms my heart to see how LabVIEW has positively influenced your jobs and your lives. We've gotten so many great responses that we are trying to think of places in addition to our website where we can feature these stories, so we'll be contacting some of you soon.
@Jeff Bohrer wrote:
I interviewed for a position with a fortune 500 company on September 10th 2001. Considering the events of the following day, I never expected to hear back. On the 18th, much to my surprise, I accepted a contract with the company and, again, much to my surprise, found out that the position I'd accepted required programming automated tests in LabVIEW! I hated "programming" all those semi-colons, syntax errors, indentions and typographical errors! Don't get me wrong- I was fluent at times in Basic, Pascal, Fortran, C++, and yes "Turtle Logo". But, maybe I'm a bit dyslexic or, it could be that my 9th grade Russain language teacher could not read my handwriting so I learned to type on a cryllic keyboard. Programming was tedious and not so rewarding that I'd choose it for a career.
That day, Sep 18th 2001, I saw LabVIEW 5.1 for the first time. The basics (wires, terminals, FP, BD, Connector pane, vi Hierarchy, and icon) were intuitively understandable! I took to LabVIEW like a duck to water! It actually took me 9 months to write a bug that involved missing a semi-colon! (and that was in a string to write to a GPIB function!)
Fast forward a decade. Today I represent a leading test solution provider as the lead LabVIEW developer! Programming in LabVIEW seems effortless! My skills continue to improve! The IDE continues to advance. And, I am challenged and rewarded in my career every day.
My professional growth has been supported by my employment as a Certified LabVIEW Developer, and participation in the NI Forums. Moreover, I LIKE "programming" and cannot imagine a career without it!
So, today was my first day contracting at ANOTHER fortune 500 company. Unlike the last fortune 500 co I worked for, this one has one person with a LabVIEW certification. (the ex-Inc has 0 CLAD's, 1 CLD, 0 CLA's: and the exF-500 Co had none when I chose to leave)
I found it "interesting" that even a quick job search showed that there were more "positions" in my State "requiring" a CLD than CLD's in the State. Hmmm....
Then my new boss says " the good thing about LabVIEW is anyone can write LabVIEW....The bad thing is ANYONE can write LabVIEW" WOW, HE's the one with the CLAD! Don't get me wrong! The "new boss" is intellegent, savvy, and a fairly decent to possibly gifted programmer (I've been there a whole day.) Yet LabVIEW permts me to abstract concepts of "TEST" into layers of code modules that make the concepts "easy to code" once the concepts are defined. LabVIEW, allows me to document the controls, VI's projects and even the wires so that they can be grasped on visual inspection without "digging" into constructs with odd syntax.
Again, Thanks for asking- LabVIEW may not have made me better but, it made my career better!
A few years ago I thought of LabVIEW as a toy and recommended that we use C#, Java, Python or anything but LabVIEW where I work. I would say that LabVIEW was for people who don't know how to write real software. Our existing LabVIEW code, some written by me and some written by others, was extremely buggy, difficult to understand and nearly impossible to scale. My suggestions to management that we completely ditch this LabVIEW toy and switch to anything else fell on deaf ears.
I thought the only way that I could be taken seriously was if I became a certified developer. If a CLD recommends using Python instead then he might be taken more seriously. And how hard could it be to get certified on a toy! I looked at the process and got my CLAD with no problems. I thought I would go get my CLD the next week so I started looking at the practice exams.
I could not solve them in four days let alone four hours. Not only that but the problems didn't seem difficult which only reinforced my dislike of LabVIEW. Why should it be so hard to solve a seemingly simple task? I was not going to let LabVIEW get the best of me so I studied everything that I needed to study and got all the practice that I had to in order to pass. By the time I got my certification I realized why I hated LabVIEW. It had nothing to do with the language and more to do with my misunderstanding of it.
How has it made me better? I look at Python code that I wrote before my quest to become a CLD in the same light as I looked at our LabVIEW code a few years ago. I am now a better Python programmer than I was before all this started.
Although I now prefer LabVIEW!
I was introduced to LabVIEW in 1988 and I was able to sway the powers to be to switch from basic to LabVIEW! I started programming in Jan 1989 (v1.2) and have not looked back. LabVIEW has kept me happily employed ever since.
With LabVIEW I can focus on solving the problem instead of fighting syntax errors.
I really Missed LabVIEW when I was a student before. For me, LabVIEW is the sole reason I love programming ^^
Thank you also for helping me when there was a time that there are points where my programs wont run well.
Brein-Ex Student
Attached is my last project
The combo plate analyzer.
It analyzes 6 holes in the comboplate and gives an RGB color profile for each hole.
I like LabVIEW because "LabVIEW extends my Imagination"
After graduation in Electronics, I did not want to become a software engineer (that includes all kinda of C, C++, Unix, etc etc. I do not even know how many). No offense, its my personal view.
I got this job for LabVIEW fresher ( I had seen NI website while at college) and liked it from the first day. Common reason being not having to remember ';', ' " "', etc and all that syntaxes, compiling etc ( had a brief course during college). It was easy to learn, easy to remember, easy to understand and colorful too!
I was happy that I am not a 'Software Engineer'. I am a 'System Engineer' building test systems and applicaitons. I finished my CLAD and CLD within 9 months of starting off with LV. And now, no turning back. 4 years and on.
On the personal front, LabVIEW taught me how easy our Life is 'not'. No "Ctl+Z" option.
Hi all
Thank you for the Kudos!


text:
Subject: OTS Integration
Date: May 17, 2012
To: Chief Executive Officers and Compliance Officers of All National Banks and Federal Savings Associations, Department and Division Heads, and All Examining Personnel
Description: Rescission of OTS Documents
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is rescinding the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) documents listed in Attachment A as part of its ongoing implementation of title III of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.
OCC 2011-47, "OTS Integration: Supervisory Policy Integration Process"
As explained in OCC 2011-47, the OCC is committed to evaluating former OTS guidance, addressing common supervisory issues consistently, and accommodating regulatory and statutory differences appropriately. The OCC's goal is to produce a consistent supervisory approach and integrated policy platform for national banks and federal savings associations (FSA), while recognizing differences anchored in statute.
Attachment A lists the rescinded OTS documents and the OCC documents, if any, that replace the rescinded documents.1 OTS documents are rescinded for one of the following reasons:
Outdated: The document is no longer needed. Any attachments to the document are rescinded only as they relate to national banks and FSAs.
The "Bank Supervision Process" booklet explains the OCC's overall supervisory philosophy and methods. The booklet integrates general supervisory policy for safety and soundness and specialty areas and includes a consolidated reference for all uniform interagency rating systems in the appendix. It also outlines bank supervision responsibilities and addresses how the OCC coordinates its supervision with other banking and functional regulators. Additionally, this booklet explains how the OCC's quality management programs, Customer Assistance Group, and appeals process support bank supervision.
As explained in the thrift executive outreach meetings held by the OCC during the transition, the OCC employs a risk-based supervisory philosophy focused on evaluating risk, identifying material and emerging problems, and directing individual banks to take corrective action before problems compromise their safety and soundness. This philosophy is embodied in the OCC's supervision-by-risk program. The OCC carries out risk-based supervision for safety and soundness purposes, including in specialty areas such as consumer compliance, asset management, and information technology.
The OCC has implemented a risk-based supervisory framework consisting of the following three components:
Core Knowledge: Information about the institution, its profile, culture, risk tolerance, operations and environment, and key examination indicators and findings. This information enables examiners to document and communicate critical data with greater consistency and efficiency.
Throughout the OCC's policy review and integration process, it has been clear that there are significant similarities and overlap in the guidance that the OCC and the former OTS issued. The two agencies shared objectives that institutions
In addition, both agencies based their examination objectives on the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System, which the bank regulatory agencies developed under the auspices of the FFIEC. Because of these similarities, the OCC is using the framework outlined above in its examination of FSAs. OCC examiners will rely primarily on OCC-issued examination procedures. Although the OTS published numerous examination procedures addressing specific subject areas, the OCC is not, at this time, rescinding those OTS-issued examination procedures (except as specifically identified in this bulletin or in previous bulletins that have rescinded OTS-issued guidance3). OTS-issued examination procedures will be rescinded as part of our future review of the related subject matter handbook section.
Even before the policy integration is completed, FSAs and national banks may find guidance issued to the other charter type useful for informational purposes. For example, an FSA may find more detailed OCC guidance on a particular topic, such as commercial lending, or a national bank may find more current guidance issued by the OTS on a particular topic, such as mortgage banking. In the course of ongoing supervision the OCC may direct national banks and FSAs to consult such guidance for further information on the subject area or to address supervisory concerns. The OCC will not cite noncompliance with the requirements included in such guidance, however, until application of these requirements has been officially communicated and related OTS-issued guidance, if any, has been rescinded.
As the OCC continues the policy integration process, it will provide periodic updates by issuing additional OCC bulletins. If you have questions about this process, contact Operational Risk Policy, at (202) 649-6550. For questions about the application of current policy guidance, please contact your supervisory office.
John C. Lyons Jr.
1Attachment B lists additional OCC guidance applicable to FSAs that relates to previously rescinded OTS guidance.
2Separately, supervisory guidance that the OTS issued for internal use (for example, "New Directions Bulletins" issued to examination staff) has been or will be rescinded.
3See OCC 2012-2, "OTS Integration: Rescission of OTS Documents," January 6, 2012; OCC 2012-3, "OTS Integration: Rescission of OTS Transmittal Letters," January 6, 2012; and OCC 2012-5, "Interest Rate Risk Management: FAQs on 2010 Interagency Advisory on Interest Rate Risk Management," January 12, 2012.
Related Links


text:
Ever been in the dentist's chair tapping a deliberate beat on the armrest while awaiting the next drilling session? My dental hygienist is sworn to secrecy!
Ever found yourself strutting precisely to the beat of a television commercial jingle for no apparent reason? I seem to do it more often than I'd like to admit.
In fact...most of us do, and right on cue. Just ask the advertisers who make millions creating those 30-second scores that predictably alter our spending habits. I've always been challenged by the inevitability of forgetting to bring home a loaf of bread, yet being unable to rid myself of those ridiculous jingles like "away go troubles down the drain." This and a host of other 10-second commercial tunes seems to remain indelibly etched in my memory despite the fact I last heard them played more than 30 years ago!
Let's face it, the music that predictably impacts us is more than just a random collection of sounds. Despite the individuality we prize, people (within a given society and at times, universally) apparently move to the beat of a common drummer. As a neurologist, I'm convinced our species is hard-wired biologically to respond acoustically in a conditioned manner to certain melodies, rhythms, tones and vibrations.
While basic scientists throughout the world are eagerly searching for specific music genes, it doesn't take a genius to realize music, emotions and our nervous systems are inseparable. A recent article quoting Sandra Trehub of the University of Toronto points out that mothers throughout the world sing to their infants in a manner universally consistent with a high pitch, a slow tempo and a distinctive tone. Across cultures and despite language barriers, these songs are clearly recognizable even to the untrained ear as lullabies.
I also believe music has been an catalyst for societal evolution/survival since the dawn of our species. Some experts believe the first instruments were developed 40,000 years ago. It is also assumed that singing or chanting predates that estimate considerably. Yet even from an anatomical perspective, it is well-established that the primary and secondary auditory areas of our brains are closely linked to specialized regions serving emotions, memory and not surprisingly, survival.
It is therefore probable that our innate capacity to relate to, or create music/ rhythms may have played a key role in forging the evolution of civilization. No doubt, individual existence was obviously impossible. Groups were necessary to brave the elements and survive the threats of savage beasts. One can logically assume that utterances with recognizable intonations and rhythms likely predated what we recognize as "language" today. Building upon those sounds, the camaraderie of survival was sculpted through group activities such as drumming which emotionally expressed collective sentiment, empowerment and the will to persevere.
In consideration of these historical roots and known biological connections coupled with recent research linking music-making in the form of group drumming to positive immunological outcomes (our soon to be published research, in press Jan. 2001 - Alternative Therapies), we now have a unique opportunity for harnessing these age-old insights in a practical manner. This is our chance to encourage the development of effective, enabling self-help strategies for those who wish to condition wellness or aid in the reestablishment of their health. Why not consider beginning by:


text:
The European Union has slapped new sanctions on Syria, targeting government officials and the country's central bank. The new measures add to mounting diplomatic and economic pressure against the rule of Bashar al-Assad.
The new European sanctions follow Friday's international meeting in Tunis that aimed to boost political and humanitarian assistance to Syria's population, while punishing the government.
European Union foreign ministers agreed to freeze the assets of a number of Syrian officials, along with Syria's central bank.
During the meeting in Brussels, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said a list of those targeted would be published on Tuesday.
"We need to get the regime - Assad - to stop killing the population," said Ashot. "And we need to find ways in which, for the right reasons, that come about as swiftly as possible and we move forward. In our perspective, it is very straight forward. You cannot lead your people, murder them and remain in leadership."
Activists say nearly 7,500 people have died in the Syrian uprising during the past 11 months. The United Nations estimates at least 5,400 people have been killed.
The European Union has already placed sanctions on Syria, freezing Syria's oil exports and the assets of more than 100 people - including President Assad. British Foreign Secretary William Hague told reporters EU action is having an effect.
"We are intensifying our contacts with the opposition, particularly the national Syrian Council which I met on Friday," said Hague. "We are providing humanitarian assistance. We are doing a great deal to try to address the situation in Syria."
There are indications international sanctions are hurting the Syrian government and the country's economy - but the crackdown and killings continue. China and Russia have also blocked a tougher international response to Syria at the United Nations.