text:
Wizards Of Pop – Sabuda & Reinhart – Week 4
Wizards of Pop: Sabuda & Reinhart is a fascinating exhibit that reveals all the twists to creating awesome pop-up books for children.
Additional Information
On loan from the National Center for Children's Illustrated Literature (NCCIL), Wizards of Pop showcases children's book creators Robert Sabuda and Matthew Reinhart's incredible work.
These artists are renowned for the extraordinary range and depth of their talents and paper engineering skills. They have created many best selling pop-up books together and separately and have stretched the realms of their readers' imaginations.
The exhibit is in the Martha Morriss Gallery, the Melanie and Allison Morriss Gallery, the William Fuller Gallery and the Lobby Gallery of the Regional Arts Center.
The exhibit is open Tuesdays through Saturdays between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. until May 4.
If you have any questions, please call TRAHC at (903) 792-8681.


text:
New Thinking for a New Era
Josh Guibault
© 2017 Created by Insights Site Creator.
Powered by
Badges |
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy (Revised 09/10/2012). Your California Privacy Rights.
Wired © 2012 Condé Nast Digital. All rights reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast Digital.
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
Moderator: BioTeam
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
These are the questions I was talking about.
Also, when I ask
I am not asking for evidence supporting your position. I am asking what evidence, if it existed, would prove your position partially or completely wrong.
For example, it is not enough to predict something like it is impossible to create life (without hybridization, etc). You also have to be able to say how your position will change if your prediction is actually incorrect.
I tried really hard not to get involved in this debate but there is just one thing I really want to point out....
I had a look at the arguments against evolution on the christianstrategies website and part of the argument seems to come from the fact that reproduction of the AIDS virus or E. coli doesn't lead to the development of a new species.
There are two points that I want to make about these examples:
1: The definition of a species (although it varies a bit depending on where you look) always requires that members of a species can sexually reproduce with each other but not with members of another species. Have a look at any decent dictionary or encyclopedia for the definitions. Neither bacteria nor viruses reproduce sexually and therefore the definition of a species does not apply to them. People generally refer to strains of bacteria or viruses rather than species as this only requires changes in traits rather than reproductive compatibility.
This means that viruses and bacteria can never produce a new species so stating examples where they have not been shown to speciate cannot be used as evidence that speciation does not occur in sexually reproducing organisms.
2. Speciation is much more likely to occur when individuals of a single species are sexually isolated and experiencing different selective pressures. That means that members of the same species that cannot or do not reproduce with each other are more likely to diverge into different species. Therefore, even if viruses and bacteria could speciate, they would be unlikely to when they are all together in the same environment (e.g. the AIDS virus is in a human body) as in the examples you give on your website.
If you're interested, there are examples of the evolution within recorded history. One is the myxomatosis virus, which was introduced by humans to cull rabbit populations. This evolved to become less virulent in order to increase its reproductive success before killing the rabbit, an event that has been recorded by scientists. Also, probably the most famous example of evolution is the peppered moth. A quick internet search will give you plenty of information about both of these.
Christian: you see, you were so sure about the faster-than-light neutrinos you have immediately implemented them into your theories. Now they have been proven wrong (some bad cable). How is your theory doing now?
Cis or trans? That's what matters.
Hello, Jack.
1. Definitevely, they're not interested in matter travelling quicker than light speed. The justification is very suspicious: the GPS and the computer card caused an advance in time of ~60 nanoseconds... when normally, they should cause a delay... OK, officcially remains non proofed... but new experiments still have to be done... this conclusion is not yet definitive neither...
2. Our Lady confirms the existence of teleportation: she comes from paradise to earth, Medjugorje in less than one second. Paradise is in the space 3D, after the farthest star, according to her declarations in New York (site www.tldm.org). Please note that teleportation is possible also for humans, like us, before the death: it is foresseen that Jesus and His angels shall take some elected (those in grace state) to paradise, through possibly a form of teleportation, to spare them to the tribulations of the apocalypse. The remaining must be tested by trial. The press shall speak, at the time, of "people kidnapped by extra terrestrials", said Our Lady or Jesus in NY.
3. I don't believe any more all that comes from the scientific world: just to remember, modern man, able to do doctor degrees remained 90.000 to 190.000 years in caves: he really loved it and insisted in not building houses in wood or stone... or he had to wait the return of the ices to start agriculture in Holland... no, in the Nile, in Africa! The return of the ices was not really necessary to start agriculture in the Nile, isn't it?
4. Jesus in www.apparitionsmariales.org confirms the 6.000 years old for mankind, but says also that the moon travels around the earth since "millions of years". If these messages are true (I have some doubts about the million of years), then the timeline during the the first 5 days of the creation, speccially the Big Bang, in the Bible, are not to take literally. I had to correct completely my reasoning about old dates in the Big Bang section of my web site because of these declarations.
5. probably the UFOs that appear near the earth and contain a race of demons (demons with a kind of biological body and must use the bus/UFO to travel), are able to travel also quicker than the speed of the light (sources www.tldm.org and www.apparitionsmariales.orgà
Conclusion: neutrinos able to travel quicker than the light remain for the moment a non proofed question. But that doesn't mean that is not possible to travel at speeds higher than the light. Sooner or later Einstein shall be forced to review his relativity equations: it shall come a time when it shall be proofed that it is possible to travel quicker than light without having infinite masses.
author (source): christianstrategies
I agree partially with you. The criteria to distinguish among two species of bacteria (or two types of virus) are quite ambiguous. But concerning the superclasses this reasoning is not valid anymore: a virus is clearly different from a bacteria or from a fungus.
So, you can take my reasoning as:
E. Coli after 50.000 generations didn't evolve enough to become a fungus
the Aids virus didn't evolve enough to become a bacteria,
despite the ability of those microbes to suffer favorable mutations (for them) making them able to resist to medicines.
I don't agree with you. The E. Coli experience and the Aids virus in a patient are the target of selective procedures: E. coli was able to survive after 30.000 generations in citric acid and the Aids virus in people has to fight the antivirus drugs the patients use. They're thus, under selective pressures, they evolve and mutate. But don't change of specie.
That kind of evolution doesn't mean change of specie: they're examples of genetical mutations of adaptation to the environment. Positive and negative mutations (ex. a cancer) are an evidence. But they don't trigger changes of specie. Only with a conceiver: God or a genetic engineer.
author (source): christianstrategies
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Hello, I'm going to try to answer to your questions, although I find they fall in the absurd. They're questions of the style:
1. "if you would see yourself the Father Christmas falling in the chimney to put gifts in the socks, would you be definitively convinced he exists and would stop believing in baby Jesus, as the master of Christmas?" I hope you understand what I mean...
2. Even if it would be possible to proof in labo that life could be generated "spontaneously" from void in the earth, we have already the proof that life can always be created alternatively through the intelligence of a creator: geneticist have already proofed they can create synthetic virus in labo (I'm afraid for mankind, if this weapon falls under the hands of Al Qaïda, but that's another story). Even so, you could not generalize darwinism for the whole nature: what would be proofed would be a local proof: it should be done similar tests for all species in nature.
3. concerning money, you sould not worry: when science and governments want, there's money: money for searching life in other planets doesn't miss, despite the declarations that life doesn't exist in other planets (behalf a race of demons that use UFO's to travel, near the earth). Implementing such a experience: try to create life from void in a disinfected environment should not be so expensive...
Normally my position in that point doesn't change, because Jesus Himself confirms that through mutations ("spontaneous" evolution, even in an environment under stress seletive conditions) it is not possible to evolve to a higher specie, although mutations of adaptation to the environment may occur. Even if it would be demonstrated the evolution of a specie into another, that phenomena couldnot eclipse the alternative phenomena of creation of life through a conceiver. Generalisation of evolutionism could not be claimed. Just to give an example, clonage could be considered an alternative way of generation of life: however, this procedure can not be claimed in the origine of life for all species in the nature...
P.S. Jesus contradicted me in the question of the age of the moon or in the question of the dinossaurs, which forced me to change my point of view in such subjects... confirming now the scientific points of view in such matters... sometimes, I, also, have to change my point of view, although there's a small risk of falsification of the messages of God...
author (source): christianstrategies
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
I can't come up with any but he can. Please don't shun the article because it has the word Bible in it.
A Christian
Just shun it because it is 100%facts-free with a wonderful chery(picked) flavour. Go buy some Cherry Garcia from Ben & Jerry's, i might hurt you waist ine, but will hurt your brain much less.
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Not really. If the question we were answering is whether Santa exists, then observing him falling down the chimney (or at any other time) would most definitely be a relevant observation. (If you also claimed that Santa and Jesus were mutually exclusive, I suppose that then the observation of one would be evidence against the other, but I don't see how that's related.)
So you are saying, if life could be generated, then it would prove nothing about past history, because it could not be generalized?
But even if I agree to that, then why did you claim that not creating life is evidence against evolution? You have just said that the ability to create life can demonstrate nothing. If so, then failing to demonstrate it is inconsequential.
If you say that evidence X is predicted by claim Y, then observing not-X weakens the case for claim Y. If you cannot provide any prediction for which this is the case, the claim is unfalsifiable.
This is the only one of the questions that you tried to answer directly, and your answer was that it wasn't possible for the situation to occur.
Nobody has an unlimited amount of money. All you have to do is raise the amount of money required - if necessary, until the price is more money than exists on the planet. Nobody is going to spend that level of resources for something that does not directly save lives - I don't think that I should need to point that out.
I've only ever been talking about evolution, not religion...I agree that observing evolution does not prohibit life from being created, but I don't think that is relevant to whether evolution occurs.
It looks like you essentially said, "Jesus confirms that evolution cannot occur. Even if evolution occurred, that would not prove anything." In other words, your position is unfalsifiable.
Again, if your argument is unfalsifiable, this discussion doesn't really have a point.
Hi Futurezooloist and commenter. There is an explanation for the acts of man, but it is a rather disturbing one. A. We have arguably the greatest intelligence in the animal kingdom. B. we have a consensus on what we are doing wrong in the world, and a knowledge of the probable consequences if we continue.
C we are doing nothing immediate about putting things right, despite the obvious necessity for haste.
In evolutionary terms this rather suggests that too much intelligence is a 'blind alley', and what happens to species that go up blind alleys?
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Just go a little bit further in this "fiction", you may assume somebody disguised as Santa Claus, with beard and a red jacket... would proof what? And if you see a hare, than have you the proof the rabbits and the eggs are the masters of Easter and not the ressurection of Jesus, a lot more difficult to proof?
What I'm saying is that, parallel ways of creating life like proofed clonage and non proofed darwinism, in order to be correctly considered as one of the possible ways (among others: creationism of course) to create the whole nature, have to show evidences that:
-they could create all species of the world, one by one. Evolution, I mean, change of specie, in only one specie is not enough to be generalized to whole nature. Darwinism fails both tests here:
1. there's no evidence of one change of specie through mutations without a conceiver
2. because step one fails, not even imaginable to do the same test for all species in the nature.
However, artificial cloning and creationim with a conceiver(God/ genetic engineer) have the potential to satisfy steps 1. and 2. Concerning artificial cloning, nobody dares to claim this artificial reproduction technic as in the origin of life. Only creationism have the potential to create the whole nature from void. We have already evidences of step 1 (creation of a synthetic virus from void), and with the technological evolution of genetics, the geneticists will be normally able to generalize the technical to create the whole species of the nature.
Just following the claim of the "million of years" of darwinists:
- I'm able to become a superman (have X ray vision, become hyperstrong, to fly), but it takes millions of years... meanwhile, I'm waiting for the mutations to occur... we have to be patient, right?
Don't come with excuses of money: they have money to build the CERN or to put HUBBLE in the space, right? That's not really an excuse not to do such a test... it is rather the free mason plot to pollute the brains of the young children at schools with the "logic" of darwinism... when they will, there's money... not all the money in the world is required to do an experience to try to reproduce on earth life from void in a disinfected environment... they don't do it, because it is loose of money: I learnt at school that it was proofed that the ancient "theory of spontaneous generation of life" was considered as false in the scientifical environments (note: unless it takes "millions of years" to occur, like me, to become superman).
1. Observing evolution? You/science observe mutations of environmental adaptation, not changes of species... Try to observe the 23 chromossoms of human specie to evolve in 24...(reasoning from Jesus self in http://www.apparitionsmariales.org)
2. creation of life with a conceiver/geneticist proofs, even if it would be possible to create life without a conceiver only by darwinism, that several ways to create life from void would have to be taken into account. Indeed, we have presently three possibilities
2.1. darwinism (theoretical, non proofed): one day, I'll become superman, within millions of years, with pacience and many mutations...
2.2. artificial cloning (local proofs available)
2.3. creationism with a conceiver (local proofs available)
Finally, yes, I believe in this matter (I mean, darwinism and not big bang), my position is unfalsifiable, beccause I'm sustained not only with some scientific evidences, but also, the bible, and all different apparitions of Jesus and Mary claim creationism as the way the nature was created (by God),in the beginning. It is hard for the science to accept it, they try to find solutions without God/a creator, but afterwards, the incoerences begin to appear (missing links in the fossils, absence of proofs etc.)
author (source): christianstrategies
I'm a bit of a newb in regards to biology so correct me if I'm wrong but is Lucy not the only link we have found between the current human and other primates? This seems like a gaping hole in the theory.
In case you're wondering, I do believe in the current scientific theory on evolution. I'm just... playing devil's advocate for the giggles.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Privacy Policy |


text:
Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
Moderator: BioTeam
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
NickT: "link" is a vague term, so I can't really tell what you mean. Lucy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_(Australopithecus) ) is a particular Australopithecus skeleton which is unusually complete, and Australopithecus may be a common ancestor of the great apes (including humans - although the common ancestor between humans and chimps was more recent).
There are definitely many hominid fossils, giving us considerable information about our ancestral relationships - for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_fossils, and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html - and ancient tool sites have often been found. The problem (and the reason why Lucy and a few other finds are so special) is that human fossils are very difficult to find. This is unsurprising, since early humans did not live in an environment conducive to fossilization.
If you'd like me to answer further questions, I'm happy to help in private messages or in another thread.
Now replying to christianstrategies:
...I thought we were talking about a hypothetical situation in which we observed Santa Claus, not observed someone in a red jacket.
Regardless, the example is irrelevant to the point I was making - that observing evidence for a proposition X implies that X is true. Appropriate evidence could indeed definitively convince me that Santa Claus exists, and actually seeing him and his flying reindeer (under controlled conditions) would probably suffice. Of course, I haven't observed such evidence, and thus will provisionally assume with reasonable confidence that he does not exist, as per Occam's Razor.
You can also see that I am very capable of answering your hypothetical question, but you have not directly responded to mine.
I understood that, and I was drawing a logical inference from it and previous things you've said. The point is that if failure to create life supports your position, then the creation of life will provide support against your position. This does not require every species to be produced - which, it seems, has only just recently become your standard of evidence, as you were previously only requesting one.
Again, it was a hypothetical question (not an "excuse"), which stipulated that we were unable to afford it. I don't think you can make an argument against the possibility of this situation unless you say that there is an infinite amount of money in existence.
If you wish, we could replace "suppose we could not afford it" with "suppose it would take too long and we won't know the answer for 1000 years." The situation is fundamentally the same - the idea is that it could be done but could not be feasibly carried out.
...Then this discussion doesn't really have a point. I'm not sure whether you understand that "unfalsifiable" is not a good thing.
I'll reply again if you can answer my questions directly, or supply useful predictions that demonstrate an understanding of falsifiability.
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Sorry, Australopithecus shall be the result of sex between humans and closer species, and to be dated between 4.300 and 6.000 years ago (existed before the flood).
And fossiles are a proof of creationism and not evolutionism: they only proof that the specie existed, and not continuous evolution.
It seems you like fiction. It seems that you don't believe in Santa Claus because of lack of evidence: you could also discard darwinism for the same reasons: lack of proofs...
1.There's only evidence of creationism: creation of synthetic virus in labo... with the technologic progress, sooner it shall be possible to create other species, it is a question of time and I'm not talking of "millions of years". There's no evidence of creating life from void with darwinism...
2. yes, to proof darwinism you have to proof it to all species in the nature: otherwise can some synthetic virus be created through geneticiens and other species through darwinism... although not even one specie can be created only through mutations without a creator... the lack of proofs as the will to remove God from the procedure is flagrant...
Ah, OK, I'll become a superman within 1000 years, but until then, I have no proofs...
author (source): christianstrategies
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Evolution depends upon incremental mutations which benefit survival. Having the ability to see is clearly beneficial to survival. The problem for me is that before an animal can see there are too many things that need to happen - we need to have eye balls which are connected to the brain which has built into it the ability to interpret the electrical signals it receives. And one little mutation accomplishes all that?
Look at that:
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
1. I've seen the video: pure non proofed bla bla... just to give a better idea of such darwinism, the vision shall still evolve a lot: normally I'll become a superman, but of course, it shall take another hundreds of millions of years, you know, mutations and selective adaptation to the environment takes too long, we must be patient... but me, as a "darwinist convinced", I really believe in the future development of my ray x capacities within many hundreds of years... of course you as darwinists believe in that too, isn't it?
No, vision was conceived through a very intelligent creator (God), and possibly in the future (no, I'm not talking of "million of years"), the geneticists will be able to reproduce it in humans, through genetic programming and technics like cloning...
2. Yes, we have stronger evidences of creationism than of darwinism. Intelligent Creators (geneticists or God) are already able to create synthetic virus and even bacterias! Links: http://www.zdnet.com/photos/scientists- ... tos/425927 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus#Synthetic_viruses . Darwinism has no such proofs... can you create a virus or a bacteria from void? Are darwinists able to make evolve a virus into a bacteria? Ah! It takes "million of years" (before I become a superman, I knew that, I must be patient...)...
In order to avoid repetition, I suggest you to see all arguments against continuous evolution without creator since page 19... billions of people are being misled in schools and universities through the logical darwinist pollution...
author (source): christianstrategies
Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
I think the real problem of why evolution is not as widely accepted as many other scientific theories, is the many questions that remain unanswered. The fossil record, why isn't there a broad range of fossils covering the spectrum of evolution instead of thousands of fossils of each species. Behe in his book the edge of evolution, shows that the odds are really against it. If no real answers can be presented we will have to go back to the drawing boards.
IMHO the main problem is that people think that evolution is incompatible with creation (just look on scottie) and thus they must fight against it to defend their god/creator.
Cis or trans? That's what matters.
Here is the definition of "life" leads to a rejection of the "theory" of evolution from the primary replicators to man and others. Life: the active situational model on the cell membrane, equipped with a polypeptide-nucleic technology. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater
Completely agree. Evolution says nothing about how life was created, just how it developed and changed afterwards...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Privacy Policy |


text:
Prior to Florida's abysmal performance in the Sugar Bowl to wrap up the Gators' 2012 season, coach Will Muschamp made it clear in an interview with The Sun that he does not believe a bowl game has anything to do with the following season.
Prior to Florida's abysmal performance in the Sugar Bowl to wrap up the Gators' 2012 season, coach Will Muschamp made it clear in an interview with The Sun that he does not believe a bowl game has anything to do with the following season.
Gator fans hope he is right.
Florida's loss to Louisville is one reason the enthusiasm level isn't through the roof when it comes to the upcoming season. Some coaches will tell you that a win in the bowl game is huge for the off-season workouts. Of course, those are usually the coaches who won their bowl games.
Here are five Florida bowl losses that definitely didn't hurt the next season:
1. 1996 Fiesta Bowl.
What happened: Florida was humiliated by one of the best teams in the history of college football, as Nebraska took the 62-24 win.
The next year: Florida won its first national championship, beating Florida State in the Sugar Bowl, 52-20.
What changed: The Gators who returned for the following season were energized by the embarrassment of the Fiesta Bowl and had a dominant season.
2. 1966 Sugar Bowl.
What happened: Florida fell behind 20-0 to Missouri and scored three straight touchdowns in the fourth quarter. The Gators came up short when three two-point conversions failed.
The next year: Quarterback Steve Spurrier won the Heisman Trophy and Florida went 9-2, a season that included an Orange Bowl win over Georgia Tech.
What changed: Spurrier was at his best in his senior year and so were many of the players around him.
3. 2008 Capital One Bowl.
What happened: Florida's young defense was handled by Michigan's explosive offense and the Gators lost 41-35.
The next year: The defense got older, Tim Tebow made his promise and the Gators rolled to a national title.
What changed: More than anything, it was defenders like Joe Haden, Carlos Dunlap, Jermaine Cunningham and Brandon Spikes simply getting better.
4. 1989 Freedom Bowl.
What happened: The Gators mailed it in under interim coach Gary Darnell, losing 34-7 to Washington.
The next year: Although the Gators were on probation, they had the SEC's best record and finished the season with a 9-2 record.
What changed: Steve Spurrier took over as coach and changed the culture as well as the offensive philosophy of a program mired in mediocrity.
5. 2001 Sugar Bowl.
What happened: Florida gave up 454 yards and three Ken Dorsey touchdown passes in a 37-20 loss to Miami.
The next year: The Gators had one of their best teams and certainly their best team ever not to get a ring. They went 10-2 with the two losses coming by a total of five points.
What changed: Rex Grossman established himself as the starting quarterback in the preseason and had a Heisman-like season.
Recent proof that losing your bowl game has little effect on the next season:
1. Ohio State 2012: The Buckeyes were beaten by a mediocre Florida team in the Gator Bowl the year before Urban Meyer took over. They went 12-0 last year.
2. Louisville 2012: The Cardinals lost the Belk Bowl to N.C. State in 2011, but rallied to win 11 games and the Sugar Bowl last season.
3. Georgia 2011: The Bulldogs suffered a humiliating loss to Central Florida in the Liberty Bowl to close out the 2010 season, but came back to win the SEC East.
4. Notre Dame 2012: The Irish lost to FSU 18-14 in the Champs Sports Bowl in 2011, but came back to make the national title game last season.
Recent proof that winning your bowl game doesn't guarantee success the following year:
1. Missouri 2012: The Tigers beat North Carolina in the Independence Bowl 41-24 in 2011. Last year, Mizzou sank to 5-7 while Carolina won eight games.
2. Auburn 2012: The Tigers came back after their national title season to win the Chick-fil-A Bowl over Virginia 43-24. A year later, they went 3-9 and were looking for a new coach.
3. Florida 2010: The Gators finished off a 13-1 season by annihilating Cincinnati in the Sugar Bowl to wrap up the 2009 season. But the next year they struggled with new personnel and went 8-5.
4. Ole Miss 2010: The Rebels seemed to have it going when they handled Oklahoma State in the Cotton Bowl to give them nine wins for the 2009 season. The next year, they went 4-8. The following year, coach Houston Nutt was canned.
Contact Pat Dooley at 352-374-5053 or at firstname.lastname@example.com. And follow at Twitter.com/Pat_Dooley.


text:
Established in 2012, Universitas Tanri Abeng (Tanri Abeng University) is a private higher education institution located in the metropolis of Jakarta (population range of over 5,000,000 inhabitants), Jakarta SCR. Officially accredited and/or recognized by the Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi (Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia), Universitas Tanri Abeng (TAU) is a very small (uniRank enrollment range: under-250 students) coeducational higher education institution. Universitas Tanri Abeng (TAU) offers courses and programs leading to officially recognized higher education degrees in several areas of study. See the uniRank degree levels and areas of study matrix below for further details. TAU also provides several academic and non-academic facilities and services to students including as well as administrative services.
University Name(s)
Universitas Tanri Abeng
Tanri Abeng University
PreBachelor degrees
Bachelor degrees
Master degrees
Doctoral degrees
Search for courses and programs with the uniRank World Universities Search Engine
Important: please contact or visit the official website of Universitas Tanri Abeng for detailed information on areas of study and degree levels currently offered; the above uniRank Degree/Study Matrix™ is indicative only and may not be up-to-date or complete.
|Local students Local student
|Not reported
|Not reported
|International students Int'l student
|Not reported
|Not reported
Important: the above uniRank Tuition Range Matrix™ does not include room, board or other external costs; tuition may vary by areas of study, degree level, student nationality or residence and other criteria. Please contact the appropriate Universitas Tanri Abeng's office for detailed information on yearly tuitions which apply to your specific situation and study interest; the above uniRank Tuition Range Matrix™ is indicative only and may not be up-to-date or complete.
Gender Admission
Men and Women (coed)
International Students
Yes, international applicants are welcome to apply for admission
Admission Selection
Not reported
Admission Rate
Not reported
Admission Office
Important: admission policy and acceptance rate may vary by areas of study, degree level, student nationality or residence and other criteria. Please contact the appropriate Universitas Tanri Abeng's Admission Office for detailed information on a specific admission selection policy and acceptance rate; the above University admission information is indicative only and may not be complete or up-to-date.
Student Enrollment
Academic Staff
Control Type
Entity Type
Not reported
Academic Calendar
Not reported
Campus Setting
Not reported
Religious Affiliation
Not reported
Not reported
Sport Facilities
Not reported
Financial Aids
Not reported
Study Abroad
Not reported
Distance Learning
Not reported
Important: please contact or visit the official website of Universitas Tanri Abeng for detailed information on facilities and services provided, including the type of scholarships and other financial aids offered to local or international students; the information above is indicative only and may not be complete or up-to-date.
Institutional Accreditation or Recognition
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi
Year of first Accreditation
Important: this section is intended to include only those reputable organizations (e.g. Ministries of Higher Education) that have the legal authority to officially recognize, accredit and/or license the Universitas Tanri Abeng as a whole (institutional accreditation or recognition) or some of its specific courses/programs (programmatic accreditation). Memberships and affiliations to organizations which do not imply any formal, extensive and/or legal process of accreditation or recognition are included in the specific Affiliations and Memberships section below. Please report errors and inaccuracies taking into consideration the above criteria.
Not available; please submit a list of official affiliations and memberships to relevant associations and organizations.
Not available; please submit a list of official first level academic divisions such as faculties, departments etc.
Not available; please submit an official general video presentation of this higher education institution.
Disclaimer: This University profile has not been officially reviewed and updated by Universitas Tanri Abeng's representatives yet; we cannot guarantee the accuracy of all the above University information.
Please visit the official website of Universitas Tanri Abeng to make sure the University information provided is up-to-date. The uniRank University Ranking is not an academic ranking and should not be adopted as the main criteria for selecting a higher education organization where to enroll.
Site last updated: Thursday, 14 December 2017


text:
Does geography matter? East side dominates Janesville city, school government
JANESVILLE—Most of the people who set Janesville's city and school taxes and decide about garbage pickup, street plowing and the number of students in a classroom have one thing in common: They live east of the river.
It's been this way for decades.
One reason for the east-side dominance of local government is that few candidates from other areas of town ever run for public office. A majority of the candidates win or lose, come from east of the river, a Gazette analysis shows.
Demographic differences play a role. The analysis shows people who live east of the river tend to have higher educational levels and earn more money than elsewhere in the city.
"More affluent people vote more than less affluent people and tend to be more politically involved," said David Canon, professor of political science at UW-Madison.
"The strongest explanations for differences in levels of voting and political participation are income, education and age," Canon said. "So if the eastern side of Janesville has the more affluent, higher-educated residents, they are more likely to be involved in politics than people in the other parts of town."
Income is a consideration, agrees Julie Gibes, a town of La Prairie resident who ran for school board a decade ago.
"A lot of people on the east side can afford not to work, or they have jobs that are so flexible that it allows them to run," Gibes said.
But does it make any difference when it comes to the decisions of the school board or council? Opinions vary.�
Council member Sam Liebert brought up the city's traditional divide last year, as the council decided who must install sidewalks.
Liebert said he heard from many constituents who said their voices were not heard on the panel the council appointed to make sidewalk recommendations.
"It shows our at-large election system is broken. We need to have alderman represented by districts. I'm sure five or six of us live within a mile of each other on the east side. It's not a representative government," Liebert said at the time.
Tom Wolfe, former school board member who has lived in every quadrant of town, said he never saw a bias on the board.
"The river always, for those of us who've been here all our lives, has provided a boundary of some kind," Wolfe said, but he never thought any school board member favored one side of town.
During his nine years on the board, Wolfe said, people accused him of working for the east side because his children attended Craig High School, and people accused him of working for the west side because he attended Parker.
Getting it from both sides, in a way, proves his evenhandedness, he said.
The school district did more school construction on the east side during those years, Wolfe said, but that was because the older buildings were on the east side, as was the city's growth.
Burdette Erickson, longtime advocate for the near-west side Fourth Ward, is happy with the current setup.
No one from the Fourth Ward sits on the city council, but Erickson has no complaints about the city's support for the Fourth Ward.
"I believe the people who serve have the entire city's interest at stake. They are honorable and respectable people who wish to serve the entire city and not any one particular issue or any one particular neighborhood. That has never come up with us," Erickson said.
School board member and east-sider Kevin Murray said called the east-side dominance "curious."
"At one time, there were three of us (living) within a block and a half," Murray said.
"We're still pretty small. We just have this cross-town rivalry that some people take pretty serious," Murray said.
Nevertheless, Murray doesn't see any geographic bias on the board.
The board actually works hard to be balanced, Murray said, noting that when questions were raised about the high school expansion projects, board members agreed to change the plans so that the wrestling facilities at Craig and Parker would be similar.
Bill Sodemann likes to point out that he's the lone west-sider on the school board, but he agrees with Murray.
"I don't think it's a big issue," Sodemann said.
Sen. Tim Cullen, who has served on both the city council and school board, said the city has changed in 50 years, and it's no longer an issue of east side versus west side.
Cullen, a Democrat, said both major political parties seem to be getting more involved in the nonpartisan local elections.
Going back at least to the 1960s, most candidates came from the east side, Cullen said. That was due in part to the now defunct Janesville Public Relations League, which worked to get very capable candidates with a business outlook to run for local office.
Those business people tended to live on the east side, but they worked for the entire city, Cullen said.
"They came there to do what they thought was right. They didn't come with their own political philosophy," Cullen said.
The local union movement also has long been active in endorsing candidates, and the business-minded Forward Janesville also is active in "finding people of a certain philosophy to run," Cullen said.
But now, he sees the parties becoming more active.
"I don't know that that's the way the city council system was meant to work, or the school board for that matter," Cullen said.
The old-school, business-minded public servants came with an open mind, Cullen believes. "But now organizations try to find people with particular philosophies."
The city's east side once leaned Republican, but now plenty of Democrats live there, Cullen noted.
And the west side now is home to comfortable subdivisions where Republicans have chosen to live, Cullen said.
It's not about geography anymore," he said.
Cullen thinks the partisanship is a problem: "I think what you are seeing now is more and more people coming to the city council and school board with preconceived notions if not positions on how they're going to vote on issues as opposed to coming there and seeing what the facts say," Cullen said.
Because of their partisanship, "I think they lose some of their flexibility once they get there," Cullen said.
Cullen noted the voucher-school and charter-school legislation at the state level, which he sees as anti-public education.
"You'd like everyone on the school board in favor of public education, but I'm not so sure that's what we're going to see," Cullen said. "I think we're going to see more people run who are in favor of private education being funded with tax money."
Liebert, himself a longtime Democratic activist, agreed about the increased partisanship.�
Rock County as a whole leans strongly to the Democrats, at least in partisan elections, but the Janesville school board and city council are moderate to conservative, in Liebert's estimation.
One reason, Liebert said, is that the people who show up to vote in the spring, nonpartisan elections tend to be older homeowners who probably have more at stake and pay more attention to local news, while those who vote in the fall partisan elections are more diverse.
Fall elections get more publicity, which helps bring out more voters, Liebert said.
Gibes, the former board candidate, suggested that paying school board members might get more people from the west and south sides to consider running.
Neither the school board nor council members are paid. Most school districts of Janesville's size pay their board members.
It's an honor to serve, Gibes said, but a stipend of $2,000 to $3,000 could make a difference.
The city in 1923 changed to its current form of government, with a city council that hires a city manager to run the city. Twice since then, the city held referendums on returning to a system with a mayor and aldermanic districts. Both referendums failed.
The ward system led to "a tremendous amount of corruption," so electing councils at-large was a part of the Progressive Era's push for clean government, said David McKay, a professor of history at UW-Rock County.
On the other hand, ward bosses worked hard on behalf of their constituents, McKay said.
In an at-large system, officials tend to lose sight of the people at the bottom, McKay said, although he said he doesn't know if that's the case in Janesville.
About half the city's schoolchildren qualify for subsidized lunches, McKay noted, but if none of the school board members have experienced poverty, they might not truly understand why that matters.
The diversity of views in a city ward system could be a good thing because no matter how well intentioned the members from the affluent part of town are, they don't know the lives of the poor, McKay said.
Bruce Monson, a local businessman who backed the 2004 referendum to change the form of city government, still thinks geographic representation would make a difference.
"The way a city can be stronger and better is by getting closer to the neighborhoods," Monson said, suggesting that the perennial sidewalk issue might be best solved at the neighborhood level.
Some worry that aldermanic districts would produce council members who don't look out for the city as a whole, so Monson likes the system some cities use: some members elected by wards, some at large.
Now, when an issue comes up, often the first thing a council member asks is what other council members think, Monson said.
"It's nice to know where the other council members are, but you need to know where your constituents are on that issue," Monson said.
Another concern is getting someone to run in some wards. Monson said people who shy away from running now because they don't feel up to handling the problems of the city as a whole would run if they knew they were representing a smaller area.
Narrowly focused council members might compete against each other for their wards, but competition can be good, Monson said.
Wards could try something on a small scale—such as allowing dogs in parks during the summer—and if it works, that idea could later be adopted citywide, Monson said.
School board members also are elected at large, but that could change if a petition drive leads to a successful referendum vote, said Dan Mallin, staff counsel for the Wisconsin Association of School Boards.
State law requires that when school board members are elected by geographic area, all voters vote for all the board members, but board members must live in the specified areas.
Liebert said he's not sure people are ready for another referendum on the form of city government. It will be interesting, he said, to see if the topic comes up after the April 1 elections.
Again this spring, most candidates for council and school board live east of the river. The exceptions are Sodemann and council incumbent Matt Kealy.


text:
I stopped her at a natural parenting meeting the night I went into labor with Gray. I took my very first sling with me and asked her how to use it. I had already planned another hospital birth, but I knew if I had another baby, it would be a homebirth and Lynda would be my midwife.
The moment I found out I was pregnant with Ivy, I called her immediately. She was the first person I told. Later on I'd change my mind and decide to go with my OB and have the baby in the hospital. But then (as she secretly predicted) I changed my mind back and wanted to have my homebirth. To this day I still think it's one of the best decisions we ever made.
I was so nervous, calling her and asking if she'd take me back. And she said I knew you'd be calling me again. Then I had to break up with my OB.
I listened to everything she told me. During one of my last visits with her, before Ivy was born, she shared her story. Her Story. About how she lived in Texas as a young girl and in highschool had a friend who became pregnant and was sent away. She went to visit her and met the "granny midwives" that would soon teach her everything... and there she attended her first births and caught her first baby.
Ivy was number 1,631.
She was an old-school hippie midwife, which is exactly what I wanted. I felt like no matter what happened, she'd know what to do. She would show the boys all her tools and let them listen through her stethoscope. She showed me how Ivy kept her hand by her face in the womb. And I would hear her laughing about it in my head "she's already a drama queen!" after Ivy was born and she'd sleep with one hand posing on her face.
I am having a hard time understanding how just 9 and a half months ago she was right here in my home, here in my bedroom, guiding me through Ivy's amazing birth. She was alive. She was fine. She appeared to be fine. And just like that, she's gone.
Lynda passed away Monday night.
I see her every time I look at Ivy. It's so hard to truly describe how I felt about Lynda. It's like when you go through a dramatic event in your life and you will always remember who you were with at that moment. You will forever be bonded from sharing that experience. Or something like that.
She was so special, and more than the average special person. She gave so much. She asked for so little in return.
I am so honored and thankful that I had the opportunity to know Lynda. I hope that if you didn't have that chance, that you can feel her touch and hear her laughter and know her now through my words, and through my Ivy or one of the other many lives she put her heart into.
I regret not hearing more of her stories. I only have a small video clip from Ivy's birth, but it's just enough to hear Lynda's voice and see Ivy in her hands...
Everything is just covered in sad. It is such a tremendous loss. She can never be forgotten.
[There was already a fund set up for her, and I know her family could use every little bit, even one dollar. And I understand if you can't because I don't have anything extra to give as things are tighter than tight, but if you feel so moved, you can donate via PayPal, payable to email@example.com .]
Subscribe to my blog here
Twitter me- I'm babysteph


text:
Edgerton student wins car in inaugural Rock County Operation Click contest
JANESVILLE — "Hey Joe! She won the car!," Janel Snell exclaimed to her husband on her cellphone moments after her daughter Julia turned the key that started a red 2010 Chevy Cobalt.
The car was donated by Burtness Chevrolet of Orfordville as the main prize for students who went above and beyond practicing safe driving for months as part of the Operation Click campaign sponsored by AAA.
"I'm so proud of her," Janel said. "She's done everything she should do, and I couldn't ask for more. This is awesome."
Julia, a senior at Edgerton High School, will attend DePaul University in Chicago this fall. She's been driving a Saturn with 250,000 miles on it, Janel said.
"When I went up there, I was shaking like, 'Please, please, please'," Julia said. "I'm so surprised. I'm totally in shock."
Julia was sixth in a line of eight students selected.
"I started crying," Julia said. "I couldn't believe it. I have a softball game tonight, so I guess that's the first place I'll be going."
Operation Click was formed in Crystal Lake, Illinois, in 1998 to teach teen drivers to practice safe driving habits. This is its first year in Rock County.
"We think its a great program," said Nicholas Pyan, vice president of the program. "The main focus is distracted driving. You don't know how distracted you are. A group of friends in the car, music, anything can take your focus away from driving."
According to Wisconsin Department of Transportation statistics, drivers 16 to 19 are more likely to be in a vehicle crash than any other group.
During 2012, about 2 percent of all 16- to 19-year-old drivers had crashes, more than one in 11 teen drivers, according to the statistics.
They also found traffic crashes statewide in 2012 killed 57 drivers aged 16 to 19 compared to 43 in 2011.
"I think this teaches teens to practice good habits," Julia said. "It's good for high schools to be involved."
Based on school participation, eight students were randomly chosen for a chance at the car Thursday; three from Evansville, two from Janesville Parker, one from Edgerton, one from Orfordville Parkview and one from Janesville Craig.
"It's always fun to watch their reactions when they turn the key and their car starts," Pyan said.
The finalists who weren't able to start the car received $50 Wal-Mart gift cards.
Evansville received an extra key because student Marissa Haegele was chosen by Operation Click as the campaign's Student of the Year in Rock County.
Parker High School was named School of the Year by the group out of 47 high schools who participate in the program.
"We recognize the school of the year for their outstanding work," Pyan said. "For being in their first year, they did a very good job."
Students participating in the pledge were required to follow rules which included:
-- No texting and driving.
-- No drinking alcohol and driving.
-- No riding in a vehicle with a driver who had consumed alcohol.
-- Wearing a seat belt at all times when operating or riding in a vehicle.
-- Strongly encouraging passengers to wear seat belts at all times when driving.
-- No alcohol-related or traffic convictions during the school year.
-- No seat belt citations or convictions.
-- No discipline issues at school.
Walworth County students participating in Operation Click from Badger, Elkhorn, Whitewater, Big Foot, East Troy, Delavan-Darien and Williams Bay high schools will have their opportunity to win a car Friday.


text:
Liberty Eiffel is a compiler for the Eiffel programming language. It continues the development of SmartEiffel, the GNU Eiffel Compiler. It is a complete, small, and fast Eiffel compiler, including an Eiffel to C compiler, documentation tools, a pretty printer, a debugger, and various other tools. It also includes a large library of classes distributed under the terms of the MIT/X Consortium License and a comprehensive set of wrappers/bindings for widespread free software libraries. Eiffel is an advanced object-oriented programming language that emphasizes the design and construction of high-quality and reusable software.
EiffelStudio is an IDE for the Eiffel language (ECMA-367, ISO/IEC 25436, and ACM Software System Award 2006). It includes: Eiffel compiler, Eiffel editor, Eiffel code browsing tool, Eiffel testing tool, graphical design tool, refactoring tool, debugger, profiler, and Eiffel analysis tools (Metrics, Dependencies, etc.). Eiffel generates C or CLI for .NET or Mono. Eiffel applies O-O principles and Design by Contract for high-quality software. Many Eiffel libraries are included: ADT, network, GUI, database, parsing (including an Eiffel parser), XML, Web, COM, and more.
xplain2sql converts files from Xplain to SQL. It supports a very large subset of Xplain, and it can convert from Xplain to Microsoft SQL Server, DB/2, Inprise InterBase, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MySQL 5, SQLite 3 or ANSI-92 SQL. It can also generate an XML description of the generated SQL. This XML description can be used to create low-level middle-tier code. Example stylesheets for Eiffel/ECLI and Delphi/ADO are included. The C source code release should compile on any platform with an ANSI C compiler. There are binary releases for FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris x86, and Windows 2000.
codemetre allows you to compare different versions of your software project, determining how and how much source files have changed. It currently recognizes both source code and comments from Ada, Bash shell, C, Eiffel, SQL, and more. It can also provide you with metrics on any single snapshot of your project.
Berkeley DB XML is a native XML database engine for use within your product. Made available as a C++ library with language bindings for Java, Perl, Python, PHP, and Tcl, it integrates directly into your application (it is not a standalone database server). It provides XQuery access into a database of document containers. XML documents are stored and indexed in their native format using Berkeley DB as the transactional database engine.
Visual Paradigm for UML is a Unified Modeling Language (UML) design tool that supports all UML diagrams, SysML diagrams, and entity relationship diagrams. Visual Paradigm for UML provides extensive use case modeling features, including full function UML use case diagram, flow of events editor, use case/actor grid, and activity diagram generation. Visual Paradigm for UML produces system documentation in PDF, HTML, and MS Word formats. A developer can design system documentation with the template designer. A system analyst can estimate the consequences of changes with impact analysis diagrams, such as matrix and analysis diagram. Visual Paradigm for UML generates Java code.
Origo is a software development and collaboration platform. It provides services that help develop software, such as source control management, issue tracking, wiki, release management, chat, blog, and forum. It uses an API to unify different tools and provides a common way to stay informed about changes in your projects. The API also allows you to integrate other tools into the plaform easily.
SmartEiffel is the GNU Eiffel Compiler. It is intended to be a complete, though small and very fast, Eiffel compiler. The current distribution includes an Eiffel to C compiler, documentation tools, a pretty printer, and various other tools including an Eiffel debugger. It also includes a large library of classes distributed under the terms of the MIT/X Consortium License. Eiffel is an advanced object-oriented programming language that emphasizes the design and construction of high-quality and reusable software.


text:
Music reviews for March 27, 2014
Elton John, "Goodbye Yellow Brick Road (40th Anniversary Super Deluxe Edition)"
It's time to dig yet again into the Elton John archives. Ten years have passed since the release of the "Goodbye Yellow Brick Road 30th Anniversary Deluxe Edition."
Happily, the four-CD, one-DVD set to commemorate the album's 40th anniversary is more than mere record label recycling. Included are a CD of "GBYBR" songs covered by contemporary artists, two discs of a 1973 concert with John and his band in top form, a handsome 100-page hardcover book and a DVD of a long out-of-print 1973 documentary by the British filmmaker Bryan Forbes.
The artists performing the covers are younger than the original album, a testament to its durability. Best is English singer Ed Sheeran, who transforms "Candle In the Wind" into strummy folk, and Irish musician Imelda May, who applies rockabilly zeal to "Your Sister Can't Twist (But She Can Rock 'n Roll)." Alas, Fall Out Boy reduces "Saturday Night's Alright (For Fighting)" to a pep rally, and an R&B/rap remake of "Bennie and the Jets" by Grammy winner Miguel and Wale fizzles.
John's album has been remastered yet again and sounds better than ever. The loud-to-soft contrasts are remarkable for a pop record, rewarding owners of quality sound equipment. Dee Murray's underrated bass work, Nigel Olsson's angelic high harmonies and Davey Johnstone's seven guitar parts on "Saturday Night" can be appreciated as never before.
Like the dynamic range, the range of material remains impressive. A musical sponge from childhood, John was at his prolific peak when the two-disc LP, 17-song set was written and recorded in a span of just two weeks. Bernie Taupin's cinematic lyrics become Technicolor tunes, and "GBYBR" is an unsurpassed distillation of rock's golden era spanning both sides of the Atlantic. John draws on the Beatles and the Stones, the Beach Boys and the Band, Bob Marley, "Soul Train," Jerry Lee Lewis and Liberace, and he makes it all his own. It helps that he's in the best voice of his career.
The lyrics are surprisingly dark, given the sunny melodies, and by the end of what used to be Side 3 we have a dead bootlegger, a dead lesbian and a dead Marilyn Monroe. The album is a funeral for one friend after another, and much more. It's electric music, solid walls of sound, cocky, campy, lovely, naughty, silly and, 40 years later, still fun.
—Steven Wine, Associated Press
The Hold Steady, "Teeth Dreams"
The Hold Steady is a garage band at heart, but it's a two-car garage in a nice neighborhood, and there might be a Mercedes inside.
Singer Craig Finn and his mates have always come across as upper-middle-class products who are usually the oldest, smartest guys at the party—and thus the ones who tell the most interesting stories. "Teeth Dreams," the Brooklyn band's sixth album, is filled with Finn's characteristically compelling characters, mostly female, as he sings about bad company, simple minds, night moves, life in the fast lane, dancing the night away and Pink Floyd. Rock doesn't come much more classic.
To help keep the '70s alive, the Hold Steady doubles down on the guitars, and recent addition Steve Selvidge teams with band co-founder Tad Kubler—a Janesville native—to frame the songs with dense, shimmering sound. It's often pretty, and it always packs plenty of punch. Horns? Strings? There's no need when you're a garage band.
—Steven Wine, Associated Press
Shakira, "Shakira"
Shakira forged a bold, distinctive career in pop long before she reached the mainstream as a judge on "The Voice."
Her last album, "She Wolf," was a wild experiment in dance pop that stretched boundaries at every turn, pulling together world beat, synth pop and whatever else fit in her unique musical view. On her new album, "Shakira," however, she is more focused than ever on charming those who have heretofore been unmoved by her truth-telling hips.
She starts with the megawatt duet with Rihanna, "Can't Remember to Forget You," that simply screams smash and follows with one clever pop twist after another. Sometimes, she recaptures new wave, especially in "Chasing Shadows," which sounds like a Latin Pat Benatar fronting the Pet Shop Boys. Sometimes, she goes after the Pitbull market, especially in the stomping "Dare (La La La)," which is already in an ad for Activia yogurt and could be a theme for the upcoming World Cup in Brazil.
But Shakira doesn't stop there. She teams up with fellow "Voice" judge Blake Shelton on the country-tinged pop of "Medicine," which works out far better than anyone would expect. She heads into Taylor Swift acoustic confessional territory in the lovely "23," though T-Swizzle would never try a line such as, "I used to think there was no God, but then you looked at me with your blue eyes and my agnosticism turned into dust."
—Glenn Gamboa, Newsday
Kylie Minogue, "Kiss Me Once"
When Kylie Minogue signed Jay Z's Roc Nation as her managers, many wondered if she would be remade in Rihanna's image. Her new album makes it clear: Kylie don't play that.
Pharrell's help on the disco-fied "I Was Gonna Cancel" certainly raises the stakes, while the EDM-tinged single "Sexercize" will raise temperatures as she coos about bouncing and getting it. However, while so many dance divas feel the need to reinvent themselves, Minogue sticks with what she does best—cranking out one dance anthem after another.
—Glenn Gamboa, Newsday


text:
Death notices for Feb. 8, 2014
Lisette "Liz" Dybevik, 79, Brodhead, died Friday at home. Services will be at 11:30 a.m. Tuesday at Bethany Lutheran Church, Brodhead. Visitation will be from 10 a.m. until the time of services Tuesday at the church. Everson Funeral Home, Brodhead, is assisting the family.
John "Red" E. Kirkham Jr., 75, Elkhorn, died Friday at Willowfield Nursing Home in Delavan. Services will be at 6 p.m. Tuesday at Haase-Lockwood & Associates Funeral Home and Crematory, Elkhorn. Visitation will be from 3 p.m until the time of services Tuesday.
Modesta "Duste" M. Matelski, 85, Elkhorn, died Friday at Lakeland Healthcare Center in Elkhorn. Services are pending. Haase-Lockwood & Associates Funeral Home and Crematory, Elkhorn, is assisting the family.
Albert L. Stoltz, 86, Beloit, died Thursday at Beloit Memorial Hospital. Services will be at 10:30 a.m. Monday at Good News Christian Center, Beloit. Visitation will be from 5 to 7 p.m. Sunday at Daley Murphy Wisch & Associates Funeral Home and Crematorium, Beloit.
Evelyn B. Thomspon, 93, Janesville, died Friday at Rock Haven Nursing Home in Janesville. Services will be at 1:30 p.m. Tuesday at St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church, Janesville. Visitation will be from 12:30 p.m. until time of services Tuesday at the church. Henke-Clarson Funeral Home, Janesville, is assisting the family.


text:
Journal Abstracts
Unlimited access to full-length articles is included with membership. Click memberships to become a member.
This article addresses the function and value of joy in pregnancy. Beginning by addressing the lack of scientific studies of joy, moving on to discuss joy as depicted in art and poetry, then delving into scientific studies of other emotions, the author leads us through the practical applications of this knowledge to the wonderful conclusion that the function of joy in pregnancy is to protect the unborn child against the effects of the harmful stress hormones and, further, that this ultimately affects the adult individual and the culture as a whole.
An adaptive lens widens the exploration of postpartum depression to include the consideration of a mother's own primal history and its resurgence through the initiation of childbirth, her preparedness to thus "meet herself" and be seen by her baby, her experience of labor, birth, and the postpartum period; implications for a healthy attachment with her child and thus that child's lifelong development; and a call to recognize postpartum non-separation as an essential protective factor against postpartum depression.
Based on her presentation at the APPPAH Congress in Los Angeles, February, 2007, and her experience in training doctors, nurses, and first responders how to speak in medical emergencies, Dr. Prager (2002) focuses in this article on the essential and biological nature of rapport and bonding in the socialization of mammals, from the earliest prenatal influences on, and the deleterious effects of their absence to all of society and the future.
This article reveals the discoveries of Varenka and Olivier Marc in their research of children's drawings from around the world. Since the 1950s, Varenka and Olivier Marc have extensively collected and studied children's (from 13 months to 3 years old) drawings during their trips around the globe (40 countries). Many of the graphics amazingly portray embryonic and fetal stages of the human body. How come little ones can depict histological and anatomical stages of human intra-uterine growth?
World population is predicted to leap from 6.5 billion today to 9.5 billion by 2050 AD. With increased pressures on humanity, we must find better ways to protect unborn and new born babies and their mothers from the dire consequences overshadowing our relationships before, during, and after birth. This paper explores a variety of What if... scenarios and themes. Hatred and prejudice as well as love and respect begin in pregnancy. Prenatal Education can be a key to a future sane world.
As attachment parenting has become more popular, many feminists condemn it as fundamentally oppressive to mothers. Their critique is based on misinterpretation and misrepresentation of attachment theory, the neuro-psychological body of research that underlies attachment parenting. In contravention of the great weight of scientific evidence, many feminists downplay the nurturance needs of young children as a defensive measure against the neo-conservative backlash against changing women's roles.
Clinical Story of a 6-Year-Old Boy's Eating Phobia: An Integrated Approach Utilizing Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology with Energy Psychology's Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) in a Surrogate Nonlocal ApplicationAbstract:
This article presents a clinical story of a one-session therapeutic intervention for a young boy's lifelong eating phobia as an example of an integrated therapeutic approach utilizing prenatal and perinatal psychology (PPN) understanding of early experiences as potential origins for life patterns and an energy psychology healing modality intervention-emotional freedom technique (EFT). Key principles of the Integrated Model and corresponding elements of an integrated therapeutic approach are presented. The session took place without the child present.
This qualitative study was designed to explore the childbirth expectations of primiparas' (women pregnant for the first time) in light of current scientific understandings of consciousness. In-depth before-and-after-birth interviews were conducted. Explicit expectations were compared with implicit expectations portrayed through drawings of an ideal birth (a projective technique) rendered during the first interview. Participants experienced outcomes that differed from their conscious expectations.
This article is an updated review of the literature on the long term consequences of birth. Current literature reviewed includes the topics of autism, juvenile criminality, drug addiction, anorexia nervosa, asthma, exposure of antibiotics during pregnancy, the behavioural effects of hormones, and caesarean sections and is offered from a primal health perspective. The article closes with recommendations the profound changes that need to be made if this vision of childbirth is to be brought to a broader audience.
The birthing experience may be perceived as a traumatic in women who present with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet a woman's view can change if she gains knowledge about the birth experience. Narrative debriefing, for example, is a source of validation, through the telling and listening of birth narratives. Further, by reading books and articles, taking mental notes, and comparing outcomes women can reevaluate their own experiences and their perceptions change as a result. Women may require repetitive debriefing to facilitate healing from birth-related trauma.


text:
Joshua Price
I'm Joshua "JP" Price, but you can call me whatever happens to come to mind. I've only been doing this radio thing myself for a few years now. But I've grown up in and around Radio all of my life. My father (Bob Price) has been in the industry for 45+ years now, so I have seen some stuff! I have a strong love for music, I thoroughly enjoy a good movie and a good book. I'm also one of the most die hard 'The Simpsons' fans you're ever going to meet. If you ever want to talk 'The Simpsons' than I am your guy!


text:
Exam Name:Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure
Exam Code:070-219
Total Questions:22 Q&As
Last Updated: Dec 16,2017
Note: We Will send Email Of PDF Within 8 hours after Payment Successfully .
Easy To Pass Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure Exams
If you want to prepare for Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure exam in shortest possible time, with minimum effort but for most effective result, you can use Politikym.org 070-219 Practice Test which simulates the actual testing environment and allows you to focus on various sections of MCM 070-219 Exam. You can choose from a list of these exams or build your own questions randomly select from question bank. Each exam is timed, and consists of the same type number of questions you'll face in the real exam and doesn't provide you with the answer until you finish the exam. Also, like the actual exam, Use or create 070-219 notes as you go and re-visit questions that you Missed. If you select any Specific area of 070-219 test that you need special knowledge on, you can direct the Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure simulator to only serve those questions. Without this 070-219 practice exam package you will be missing the most crucial element of Microsoft preparation. (1)
Politikym.org provide some 070-219 samples of questions and answers. You can try our 070-219 free demo and download it. If you satisfied, you can add MCM 070-219 exam dumps to your shopping cart. After you make a payment, we will send your 070-219 exam dumps to your mailbox. And later you can check your email and download the attachment. (2)
070-219 exam is a popular certification exam among those IT people who want to pursue their careers in this field. Most candidates want to pass 070-219 exam but couldn't find the best way to prepare it. Fortunately, Politikym.org can provide you with the guidance in preparing for your 070-219 exam. Politikym.org is a website that covers a wide range of IT exam materials. Our IT experts have many years' experience about 070-219 exam. Politikym's exam questions and answers are already being tested by IT professionals and the hit rate is up to 99%. With the aid of our exam materials, it can absolutely help you pass the exam. If you don't pass the 070-219 exam, money back guarantee. (3)
Quality and value 070-219 dumps. Politikym.org 070-219 practice Exams are written to the highest standards of technical accuracy, using only certified subject matter experts and published authors for development - no all dumps. We are committed to the process of Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure vendor and third party approvals. We believe professionals and executives alike deserve the confidence of quality coverage these authorizations provide. (4)
If you prepare for the 070-219 exams using our testing engine, It is easy to succeed for all certifications in the first attempt. You don't have to deal with all dumps or any free torrent / rapidshare all stuff. We offer free demo of each product. You can check out the interface, question quality and usability of our practice exams before you decide to buy.
Politikym.org helps millions of candidates pass the exams and get the certifications. We have tens of thousands of successful stories. Our dumps are reliable, affordable, updated and of really best quality to overcome the difficulties of any IT certifications. Politikym.org exam dumps are latest updated in highly outclass manner on regular basis and material is released periodically. Latest Politikym.org dumps are available in testing centers with whom we are maintaining our relationship to get latest material.
Experience Politikym.org exam material in PDF version.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our PDF real exam demo of your 070-219 exam.
Instant download
Latest update demo according to real exam


text:
Tuesday Morning Breakfast Forum
Lecture | Seminar
Date: November 13, 2012
Time: 8:30 am
Location: Show map
West Charlotte Recreation Center
2222 Kendall Drive
Charlotte, NC 28216
Contact: Steve Johnson
Email: email@example.com
The Forum shares with all present "information of importance to the African American community in particular and the rest of Charlotte in general." Come in, have a cup of coffee and make yourself comfortable. Look around. Among those around you on any given day will be wage earners and business owners; civic activists and nonprofit executives; and a variety elected officials of this community -- judges and members of Charlotte City Council, the county commission, school board and state legislature.
The Forum begins at 8:30 a.m. Doors open at 8 a.m. Coffee is available. After the speaker's address, a question-and-answer session follows. At roughly 9:45 the presider calls for announcements. The speaker for the next Forum is often the first announcement. Thereafter, anyone present may present information about community events or milestones.
For upcoming events and guest speakers: www.tueforumclt.org
Go Back | Send this page to a friend


text:
UPDATE: Man hit by semitrailer truck on I-39 near Milton identified, in critical condition
JANESVILLE�— A man attempting to remove a piece of luggage from the road was hit by a semitrailer truck Wednesday morning on Interstate 90/39 near Milton, according to a Wisconsin State Patrol news release.
The incident happened at 10:49 a.m. on northbound I-90/39.
Sean Odegaard, 19, from Brooklet, Ga., was in the right lane when the semitrailer truck driver, Charles Gresham, 54, couldn't stop before hitting Odegaard, according to the release.
Odegaard is in critical condition and is being treated at Mercy Hospital and Trauma Center, Janesville.
When the state patrol arrived at the scene, Odegaard was found lying on the right shoulder of the road, Sgt. Adrian Logan of the state patrol said.
Edgerton Fire and EMS and the Janesville Fire Department also responded.


text:
Natural selection is proven wrong
Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
Moderator: BioTeam
Re: Natural selection is proven wrong
tart the
then you have point 2 of deans
but for point 1
something needs to get to the gene to start the mutation ie virus radiation etc
so tell us the random process that gets the something ie virus radiation etc to the gene
Why aren't any of you talking about the sun?
It was there before any life on this planet began. You asked why mutations started in the first place. How about the idea that mutations are a tool for adaptation. The sun changes, the weather changes, gravitational forces change, atmospheric content changes, there are many changes. It seems that DNA is also subject to change. Actually it seems that everything is subject to change. Is that not what a mutation is, just a change.
Without change, there is extinction.
The real question is why does life matter so much to keep it going? Changes happen, we know how they happen and even in many cases where they originated from, but whats the point of this continuous adaptation through generations of lifeforms?
Re: Natural selection is proven wrong
now that is some sort of explanation behind the random process that starts the mutation that leads to the generation of a new species
that is a lot more than canalon has offered - but then he want find explanations like that in his holy/sacred biology text books
all canalons books can tell us is what happen AFTER the starting process not BEFORE
Re: Natural selection is proven wrong
This is explanation??? So what did we provide?
Cis or trans? That's what matters.
Re: Natural selection is proven wrong
you say
all those changes could/can be part of the random process that start mutations that generate new species
ie a virus was blown onto a gene
sun spots might have caused a lonely neutron to fly onto a gene
chemicals in the atmosphere might have fallen onto a gene
A mutation is a change in the genetic code. It does not start before the DNA is changed by chemical or other means. You do not make sense.
In fact the more you are trying to argue the more you are showing your complete ignorance of the subject at hand. I gave you a link to a place where you can go and instruct you for free. You chose instead to make a fool of yourself. Do not expect to be treated with any sort of respect. You deserved to be called an ignorant idiot, and you will be, you ignorant idiot.
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
Re: Natural selection is proven wrong
a changed caused by ie a virus radiation via a random process a random process genetics cant explain
an example of such a random process which could start the mutation
"a virus was blown onto a gene" something is terribly odd with this statement
same with "sun spots might have caused a lonely neutron to fly onto a gene" well this one is just wrong. Neutrons cant move so freely without some kind of catastrophic effect
"chemicals in the atmosphere might have fallen onto a gene" why not, sounds pretty "ok"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Privacy Policy |


text:
Darwin and Racism
Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
Moderator: BioTeam
Darwin and Racism
If I go to my bookstore to the science section, what I see predominantly is Darwin, while microbiology is a small softcover on the bottom shelf. But it seems this man was a true foundational racist. Should evolutionists be holding him up so high?
I might add that Hitler attempted something of what Darwin here says.
If you were to read the litterarture of the time, I doubt that you would find anything that would not be considered extremely racist by today's standard. He was a man of his age, I suspect that in a 150 years, some concept that appear completely natural for us will also appear completely alien and possibly repulsive to our descent. However by the standard of his time, Darwin was quite liberal, he did not advocate extermination or alienation of the other races, he just saw them as different and less advanced. And AFAIK he was not an advocate of the extermination.
But even if he had his bad sides (he is a human after all) that would not change the importance of his discoveries and theory. Many other famous and revered human being held for granted thing that would be abbhorent by today's standard. Aristotle is considered a a foundation of modern ethics. Greek at his time were considering all women and non greek as barely human, and have no problem with death penalty...
As for the Hitler comparison, that is stupid beyond contempt. Should we hold Jesus responsible for the crusades? After all the crusaders went in his name...
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
Whoa, both the Darwin AND the Hitler card in the same post. That's hardcore creationism I must admit.
Now, if Darwin was the one to figure out how evolution and natural selection work, why should his other opinions about races matter in this regard? Heck, even if he liked to molest little children and call all women sluts it still hardly affects whether or not he is the father of the theory of evolution and a great scientist because of that. Even if the creationists' favourite devil Hitler himself had devised these theories and then by using them as an excuse exterminated millions of people, it hardly makes the theory itself any more valid or invalid.
They are completely different matters, how Darwin was like as a human, and how he was like as a scientist. Even a bad, evil, racist nazi could be a clever scientist. And what comes to Darwin himself, he was actually quite liberal and tolerant by the standards of his time. Unlike, say, the christian church...
Re: Darwin and Racism
I never knew that Darwin actually said that. I don't see in the statement that he was advocating what Hitler did--but I have seen Hitler's speeches--Hitler inferred he was doing evolution a service, and it would start in Germany.
It seems by this statement though, that Darwin believed Caucasians were more evolved than blacks.
This is philosophical racism whether Darwin intended ill or not. Perhaps it has been taken out of context, and you can enlighten me.
As for the crusades--the crusades would have never happened if the church in the dark ages would have provided scripture to the common man. Jesus said his kingdom was not of this world or his servants would fight--he told Peter to put his sword down in Gethsemane--he said he could have called 12 legions of angels but how then would the scriptures be fulfilled---and that is why he came-- to die for us, so that we might live. But the crusaders were only following what they were taught by the church--not what Christ taught.
This is exactly why you don't follow the church per se or it's leaders, you follow Christ with the church.
For Darwin: As we both told you, racism was definitely part of the world view of the western world in the XIXth century, so there is nothing surprising in Darwin's word. And Darwin being willing not to treat member of other "races" as animals would be considered quite liberal by the standard of his time. Not so by those of our time.
For the crusades: I am not completely sure, even access to the scripture has not prevented religious wars, racism and quite a lot of horrible deeds all in the name of one god or another. But that is beside the point, my point was that the darwinian theory in no way imply the interpretation that has been done by the Nazis in Germany. I doubt that would have even remotely approved. And I would remind you that Evolution by natural selection is a description of the relation between population of organisms. There is no such thing as more evolved, superior, or anything that would justify a genocide. It only talks about reproduction rate and change in relative composition in population. In fact the Nazi use would be more based on Galton's eugenism (a philosophy that use NS as its core, but make decision that do not naturally follow evolution). This is a really bad argument against evolution, and starting a discussion at the godwin point is probably not the very best idea...
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
Re: Darwin and Racism
Darwin was no more racist than he was allowed to be by society at that time. Just like many people today are only as accepting of homosexuality as society allows them to be. If someone was a racist as Darwin today, that person would be in an extreme, but it was normal at that time. Within every movement of people there is a range of normality that most people stay within. That is what Darwin did as far as racism is concerned, though he challenged society with his science.
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end; then stop.
Re: Darwin and Racism
But you must admit--there are social implications because of evolution. It is not some benign theory that is in some scientific lab set away from society. It tells us WHO we are. The conclusions it draws anyone to is that we are just another variation--a result, and really no different than animals--just perhaps more intelligent. There is no way of knowing if there is a god or gods or God.
What is then morality? What is innocence or guilt or conscience? Law then is made up by people, and it is certain everyone has different opinions on right and wrong.
If it is just survival of the fittest--what is wrong with me stepping on you as long as I look good and I get ahead? Why not cheat on your wife if it feels good and she doesn't know? Why not give misinformation as long as no one gets hurt, and I make money? One person says the fetus is just the body of the mother, the other person kills the abortion doctor. Who is to say who is right and who is wrong? It becomes will of the majority who become like waves on the sea--tossed with every new moral code, political correctness, or new precedent set by the courts.
Completely untrue. It does tell us what we probably are - but it can never address the question of who or why we are. Anyone attempting to draw conclusions along those lines, using evolution as proof, is a fool.
Clearly, to you, if evolution is true it must replace God - and everything that you've associated with your belief in God, such as morality and purpose.
So basically what you're saying is that you think it's impossible that humans could have evolved the capacity to differentiate right and wrong - to be fair and just?
The FACT is that humans have an individual capacity to develop philosophies and morals - regardless of where that capacity came from. Scientific evidence points to the probability that this capacity originated via evolution.
If it's possible for you to imagine a world were all morality and ethics no not originate from some benevolent deity - do so, and take a second look at the world you live in.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
Re: Darwin and Racism
Maybe so, but it still doesn't make evolution and natural selection untrue. Even if the truth is unpleasant, it is still the truth.
And it's absurd to think that a human society is uncapable of forming moral and ethical rules without some divine text. After all, even the bible has been written by men, so all moral rules you take from there are invented by us and us alone. I accept evolution and natural selection, yet I still don't have any urge to kill weaker people or think that a certain group of people is inferior to some other because of their skin colour etc.
Re: Darwin and Racism
I understand completely--it is really stupid to think that laws written by another culture thousands of years ago would be able to guide us.
Somehow the church in general has not gotten the message out, because this is not what the Bible teaches. Conscience is IN us. This has traditionally been an apologetic of the moral nature of God and the fact that we are created "in his image." However it seems that evolution would attempt to lay claim to the evident fact of conscience also.
If you have the time to read this I ask you to bear with me for a second and consider "just a book" --theBible. How can we rule something out that we have not fully considered?
Genesis is a spiritual book, and so are the other books of the Bible, but then God is a spirit--He is not natural. He made natural things, but he is concerned primarily with spiritual things. He made us in his image, and so we have a spiritual nature. No matter if we go to the mosque, temple, church, or nowhere.
Modern science is naturalistic, so it makes sense that statements like, "there is no way to tell if there is a god," would come from this arena of research. Naturalistic science (and it is not bad in and of itself--it is beneficial) excludes the supernatural in research. This is not derogatory--it is simply the way it is.
However there is evidence of the supernatural, and just one of them is conscience. If you believe conscience is a result of evolution, there are other things that can have no explanation in natural science. And I'm not talking about stupidity such as a picture of Jesus or Mary on your toast!
It is not logical to to say that something does not exist (or it is absurd) which is by principle excluded from a research setting. Therefore it is not logical to assume that the supernatural does not exist, nor is it logical to assume that a book based on the supernatural is false or outdated. Therefore it is necessary by principle to go outside the confines of modern science to find supernatural data.
The problem is that modern men believe supernatural data is irrelevant, when it in fact has relevance, and lays claim to their very being and eternal soul. The implications of the confirmation of the eternal word of Christ can be ignored but never escaped without eternal consequences.
Hey now, careful! Some members of this forum are firm believers in Jesus/Mary toast miracles.
But on a different note, how about this: Saying there is no god is just as illogical as saying there IS a god. Such statements can only exist outside the scientific process, as they are untestable.
This is just your belief and you have no evidence to support it, aside from your personal convictions. How do you expect any of that to have any relevance?
Clearly we have the capacity for concieving of such a thing as spirit or supernatural. You say this capacity comes from an unseen unproveable source. Evolution hypothesizes that it comes from our genetic lineage - and provides evidence that we have indeed evolved to our current state. Furthmore biology (not evolution) has shown that our perceptions of spirit, supernatural, morality, conscience, etc can all be altered by changing chemical balances.
I'm not saying that we're all hopeless automatons completely reliant on our genes and physiology - and lacking all free will. We're clearly not - though our biology probably influences much more than we're willing to admit.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Privacy Policy |


text:
Death Notices for Dec. 3, 2013
Shirley A. Gorman, 68, Janesville, died Sunday at Mercy Hospital and Trauma Center, Janesville. Services will be at 11 a.m. Thursday at St. William Catholic Church, Janesville. Visitation will be from 9 a.m. until the time of services Thursday at the church. Schneider Apfel Schneider & Schneider Funeral Home and Crematory, Janesville, is assisting the family.
Janice M. Iverson, 76, Evansville, died Tuesday at home. A celebration of life will be held from noon to 2 p.m. Saturday at Ward-Hurtley Funeral Home, Evansville.
Ann Marie Kraus, 46, Whitewater, died Saturday at St. Mary's Hospital, Madison. Services will be at 2 p.m. Saturday at First English Lutheran Church, Whitewater. Visitation will be from 4 to 8 p.m. Friday at Nitardy Funeral Home, Whitewater, and from 1 p.m. until the time of services Saturday at church.
Wayne W. Long, 70, Darien, died Monday at Mercy Hospital, Walworth. Arrangements are pending at Monroe Funeral Home, Delavan.
Erwin C. Poeppel, 89, Fort Atkinson, died Sunday at Alden Estates, Jefferson. A Mass of Christian burial will be at noon Thursday at St. Joseph Catholic Church, Fort Atkinson. Visitation will be from 10 a.m. until the time of services Thursday at the church. Nitardy Funeral Home, Fort Atkinson, is assisting the family.
Michael K. Young, 93, Lake Geneva, died Oct. 10, in Lake Geneva. Memorial services and visitation will be at 11:30 a.m. Saturday at Steinke Funeral Home, Lake Geneva.


text:
North Park Village Nature Center
5801 N. Pulaski Rd. Chicago, Illinois 60646
(312) 744-5472
Fee: Free
Registration Fee: Registration required.
Age Range: All Ages
We'll use sticks, leaves, recycled Christmas trees and even snow to keep warm in a snug shelter that works year round and in almost any area of the world. Dress to be outside for the majority of class time. Registration required.


text:
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
23,064 users here now
New to reddit? Click here!
You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?
Submit interesting and specific facts that you just found out (not broad information you looked up, TodayILearned is not /r/wikipedia).
Submissions must be verifiable. Please link directly to a reliable source that supports every claim in your post title. Images alone do not count as valid references. Videos are fine so long as they come from reputable sources (e.g. BBC, Discovery, etc).
No personal opinions, anecdotes or subjective statements (e.g "TIL xyz is a great movie").
No recent sources. Any sources (blog, article, press release, video, etc.) more recent than two months are not allowed.
No submissions regarding or related to the following
No misleading claims. Posts that omit essential information, or present unrelated facts in a way that suggest a connection will be removed.
Rephrase your post title if the following are not met:
No submissions related to the usage, existence or features of specific software/websites (e.g. "TIL you can click on widgets in WidgetMaker 1.22").
All NSFW links must be tagged (including comments).
(Why we need rules)
If your post does not appear in the new queue and you think it meets the above rules, please contact the moderators (include a link to your reddit.com post, not your story).
Please report spam, inaccurate or otherwise inappropriate posts by messaging the moderators, as this helps us remove them more promptly!
More information available on the TIL FAQ and wiki.
As of August 2017
We ask that you please do the following:
avoid mobile versions of websites (e.g. m.wikipedia.org)
link to the appropriate heading when referencing an article (particularly on Wikipedia)
link to the appropriate start time when referencing videos (e.g. on YouTube)
add [PDF] or [NSFW] tags to your posts, as necessary.
Please avoid reposting TILs that have already made the front page in the past
Please also read the site-wide Reddiquette.
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
TIL in 1946 two partners in a large pest control company were charged with genocide and hanged because it was argued they should have known that the large amounts of Zyklon B they provided to concentration camps was too much for delousing. (worldcourts.com)
submitted 3 years ago by Demithus315
Post a comment!
[–]pogg 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children)
I guess the court didn't accept that they were just filling orders.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. © 2017 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
Advertise - lifestyles
π Rendered by PID 16322 on app-99 at 2017-12-12 01:01:56.005709+00:00 running cf1e1f4 country code: US.