text:
Pizza is the most famous fast food item in the world and is loved by the people. It is appetizing and different kind of food which is known in the whole world. It is ever considered as the sign of fast food, and it has many types as well. Which have their best foods chain in the whole world for serving people? All cooks of the world are working to make some different pizzas with different ingredients to capture all the food lovers around the globe. It is the most famous and eaten food product in the earth. Pizzas are available in the world at different costs according to the name of the restaurants and the quality of them. In this post, we will discuss specifically top ten most expensive pizzas in the world.
Top Ten Most Expensive Pizzas In The World 2016 Ranking
10. Kobe Beef Steak Pizza, Domino
It is most well-known in Japan as Japanese believes that luxury in fast food is the best thing and is liked by the people as well. Domino`s is the most famous food chain in the whole global market. The topping of this pizzeria is very delicious and attractive as well. Domino`s is known for producing many toppings for the people rather than the typical toppings in the globe. The cost of this delicious pizzeria is $72.
9. The Magic Gold, Magic Oven
It is the particular pizza of a restaurant of Toronto called Magic range. That eatery has the specialty of pizzas and their many ingredients used in them. It also offers different unique toppings that can be chosen, according to your taste. The cost of this pizzeria is $108. It is not only tasty but gorgeous as well.
8. The Post e Tartufo, Third Avenue Café in Dubai
Dubai is very famous place in the world not only for its sightseeing but their food as well. The third street of Dubai has the best pizzeria in the planet which has the topping of lobsters and truffles as well. The cost of this pizza is $125. It has very different taste because of many imported ingredients used in its preparation. It is also located at the most luxurious place in Dubai.
7. Triple Mille-Feuille Pizza, Domino`s
Again here comes Domino food which is famous all over the world. It is very many kinds of the pizzeria with stuffed crust and its edges are roll which also has a cheese filling in it. Their pizza is usually three layers and the most famous one as well. It is hefty pizza because of double filling of cheese in it. The price of this pizza is almost $140. The look and taste of this pizza are appetizing and attractive as well.
6. The C6 Steveston Pizza Company
That different and delicious pizza was introduced in 2012 which has the topping of lobsters and some unique ingredients as well. It is the best pizza of Steveston Company. It has minuscule size, but the whole look and texture of this pizza are very wealthy and luxurious which ultimately equal its high price. It is the best and most eaten pizza of this restaurant. Its price is $450 which is a high price for a single pizza.
5. Nino Bellisima, New York
New York is very famous place in the world, and their foods items are also very famous in the world. The outside of their pizza is thin which is loved by the people. The top of this pizza is very unusual like of lobsters, etc. The price of this pizza is $1000. The look of it is very attractive which attracts people from all over the world.
4. The World`s Most Expensive Pizza, Margo`s Pizzeria
It is not the world`s most expensive pizza, but its name is kept to make it more famous and known in the world. They believe in creating something different in the world with unique taste as well. Its price is $2,400 which is a very high-cost tag but still people love to eat it.
3. Haggis, Glasgow, A Domenico Crolla Restaurant
The name of this most expensive pizza is kept on the famous personality called James Bond. This pizza is well-known in the world with the name Pizza Royale 007. It is further enhanced with the gold dust, and the topping of this pizza is complete with the lobster soaked in the champagne which added more taste to this pizza. The cost of this famed pizza is $4,200.
2. Favitta`s Family Pizzeria, New York
Favitta family pizza is famous in the world with the name pizza for lovers. The cost of this pizza is $8,200. It has the topping of sprayed diamonds which is unusual, and no one has predictable this as well. The cost of the pizza keeps on changing because of the cost of diamonds used to it. It is most expensive and luxurious pizza of the world.
1. Louis XIII, Salerno, Italy, A Renato Viola Creation
It is the most luxurious pizza in the world. It takes almost 72 hours only for the making of its dough. The topping of this most expensive pizza is done with the buffalo mozzarella and pink sea salt as well. The price of the world`s most luxurious pizza is $12,000. It is very luxurious, and everyone in this world cannot afford to eat this pizza.


text:
Kevin Love, the hottest NBA commodity available as free agency options dwindle, remains with the Minnesota Timberwolves and owner Glen Taylor hopes to keep the All-Star in the fold.
Love plans to test free agency if he plays out his current contract with the Timberwolves, who have not made the playoffs in Love's six seasons.
"I say back to Kevin, 'Well, that's what I want, too,'" Taylor said on NBA TV.
Many teams are targeting Love, including the Cleveland Cavaliers, who now appear to be willing to offer forward Andrew Wiggins, the No. 1 pick in the NBA Draft last month, in a package to land Love, according to reports. But the teams are not yet close to finalizing a deal, USA Today reported.
Golden State Warriors and Boston Celtics also are interested in Love. The Timberwolves are said to prefer a combination of young players on rookie contracts and draft picks. The Boston Celtics could bring the best combination to the table with a multitude of draft choices and 2014 lottery pick Marcus Smart available in any deal.
Cleveland wanted to reel in Love without giving up Wiggins, the athletic wing player whose leaping and scoring ability give him "unlimited" potential, according to Cavs general manager David Griffin.
"We are going to look at everything that makes sense that would make our team better," Taylor said. "But we are not going to move a superb player like (Love) without getting equal or more value back."
The Warriors were once considered the leader for Love. While talks with Golden State could be rekindled, first-year head coach Steve Kerr has a strong preference to hold onto shooting guard Klay Thompson, a key part of the offense that includes backcourt mate Steph Curry.
"My preference is that Kevin will come to camp — and I'm sure he will — and play with the team," Taylor said.
A third or fourth team could be needed to make the deal work.
The Celtics' best young asset is Smart, but the Timberwolves would be unlikely to unseat Ricky Rubio at point guard unless his contract pushes him out of Minnesota right behind Love.
Cleveland is a co-favorite for the NBA title in 2015 according to Las Vegas Hotel sportsbook. Given Love's desire to join a winning roster, it is uncertain whether he would be willing to agree to a long-term deal with Boston or another team that has not recently made the postseason.
"It's tough seeing all these guys that are young and older who have all played in the playoffs. When they start talking about that, I have nothing to talk about. If I don't make the playoffs next year I don't know what will happen," Love said. "If we don't make the playoffs, I don't know it's going to be me or something, but our management needs to step up and make some moves."

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The NHRA Mello Yello Drag Racing Series is hauling fast on a track near you! Enter below for your chance to win tickets to the Auto Club NHRA Finals November 10th through 13th at Auto Club Raceway at Pomona from K-EARTH 101 and Mello Yello. This is MY world.
Click here to purchase tickets.
Enter below to win four tickets to use any day between November 10-13.
(1 winner to be chosen)


text: Some folks may think this is dumb question, but I will ask anyway. Do you use a stick edger to edge a mulched area that has no border? (The grass comes up to the mulch.) Do you edge, mow, trim and blow? I am asking in what order. Thanks in advance for any advice.


text:
Preferred Indiana Golf Package Providers
Golf Trip Junkie
Golf Trip Junkie specializes in golf trip packages to amazing golf destinations.
Event Homes
Event Homes allows travelers to easily find the perfect location to rent for their next event or golf vacation.
GolfTrips.com is a leading golf travel planning website and golf trip provider.
Great Indiana Golf Packages
Make the Perfect Drive to Northeast Indiana and experience some of the best golf Indiana has to offer. Here you can play several fantastic golf courses that have been recognized by Golf Digest.
I69 Golf Trail
Looking for a golfer's getaway that is close to home, affordable, and offers world-class courses? Take a road trip along Northeast Indiana's I-69 to discover your next golf getaway! Both Fort Wayne and Grant County, Indiana offer outstanding Stay-and-Play packages that enable you to make a weeke
Pete Dye Golf Trail
Contrary to popular belief, Pete Dye, to the best of our knowledge, is not a sadist, but as anyone who has played his courses knows, he is certainly not a pushover. Golfers who like their courses challenging, and are fond of railroad ties, should sample Pete's particular brand of pleasant torture by


text:
She's back, honey!
Carol Schwartz ended her five-and-a-half years in the political wilds Monday with the surprise announcement of her fifth mayoral run. A decade ago, the Schwartz brand was one of the city's most indelible, melding social progressivism, fiscal rectitude and brassy folksiness with lots of chunky costume jewelry. (For more on Schwartz's record, see the sprawling statement she launched her campaign with.)
It has been a while, however, since Schwartz has weighed in on the issues of the day, so after her phone stopped ringing off the hook Monday afternoon, I queried her on a few of the hot-button issues defining this mayoral race. While she shared few hard-and-fast positions, then again, neither have the other leading candidates in the race.
D.C. United stadium: Schwartz said she's a "supporter of the soccer team" and sponsored ceremonial resolutions back when United was in the habit of winning league titles year in and year out. She said she was "not against" the $300 million stadium deal but wants to take a closer look at the deal: "I haven't read this deal, so I don't know all the nuances of it. My major concern is about the Reeves Center. We seem to be playing top dollar for the land and not getting top dollar — in fact, totally the opposite — for our land."
School boundary review: Schwartz demonstrated only a passing familiarity with the boundary and feeder-pattern overhaul now being conducted by Mayor Vincent C. Gray. In any case, Schwartz said, the process should be halted until a new mayor is in place: "With the change of administration, I think this is not the right time," she said. "That doesn't mean there's not any merit in why the study was started. Schwartz said she'd be opposed to any system that ends the guarantee of a neighborhood school: "I don't think we have a perfect system now, but I don't think that means we upend our system. … The most important thing is to ensure that every school in every neighborhood is good."
Firefighter shifts: Schwartz did not take a position on whether or not firefighter shifts should be kept as is, in a 24-hours-on/72-hours-off configuration, or shifted to 12-hour shifts, as Gray has proposed. "I'm very open to discussion about those things," she said, noting her past support from the firefighters' union. "Maybe there's something in between that could work. … I don't feel comfortable talking a position on it right now."
Affordable housing and homelessness: Schwartz said she'd do more to implement inclusionary zoning, a program she supported when she was on the council that allows developers to "buy" additional density by providing affordable housing units. "Here we are now, a decade later, and there's only a few [units]," she said. On homelessness, she said she would be reticent to close the troubled D.C. General family shelter: "I think we have to have alternatives. … There's no easy solutions. Everybody says, 'Yes, we need more homeless shelters, but not in my neighborhood.'"
Tax reform: Schwartz said she was "very pleased" to see the D.C. Council pass a broad tax relief package as part of the fiscal 2015 budget. "We need to be competitive to attract residents," she said. "We are not an island unto ourselves." But she said she would have worked to remove the sales tax expansion to health clubs and other services — the so-called "yoga tax" or "gym tax" — before it went to final vote. "In that size budget, you could find a savings somewhere," she said.


text:
Britannia Industries shares jumped over 15 per cent on Monday after the food products manufacturer reported a 13 per cent jump in its June quarter net profit.
Britannia Industries posted a net profit of Rs 219 crore in Q1 compared to a net profit of Rs 194 crore in the corresponding quarter of last fiscal. Mumbai-based Britannia Industries' sales rose 8 per cent to Rs 2,162 crore.
Britannia's EBITDA or operating margin increased 10 basis points to 14.4 per cent in the June quarter.


text:
Legal Status
Document Details
Published Document
Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
Direct final rule.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending certain references in various medical device regulations. The amendments update the references in those regulations to various standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) to reflect the current standards designations. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is publishing a companion proposed rule, under FDA's usual procedures for notice-and-comment, to provide a procedural framework to finalize the rule in the event that the agency receives any significant adverse comment and withdraws the direct final rule.
The rule is effective June 7, 2000. Submit written comments on or before Start Printed Page 3585April 10, 2000. If FDA receives no significant adverse comments within the specified comment period, the agency intends to publish in the Federal Register a document confirming the effective date of the direct final rule within 30 days after the comment period on this direct final rule ends. If the agency receives any adverse comments, FDA intends to withdraw this final rule by publication in the Federal Register of a document within 30 days after the comment period ends. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of certain publications in § 801.410(d)(2) (21 CFR 801.410(d)(2)) and § 801.430(f)(2) (21 CFR 801.430(f)(2), effective June 7, 2000.
Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.Start Further Info
Philip L. Chao, Office of Policy, Planning, and Legislation (HF-23), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-3380.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
I. Background
The ASTM notified FDA that ASTM had been working on a project to help Federal agencies update and maintain the ASTM standards that are referenced in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR's). Use of consensus standards such as those developed by ASTM is consistent with the purposes of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, signed into law on March 7, 1996 (Public Law 104-113). As part of the ASTM project, ASTM informed FDA that many ASTM standards cited in FDA's food additive and device regulations were out-of-date and provided a list of standards with their current year designations. ASTM listed 58 different regulations which, in its opinion, needed to be updated.
FDA examined the ASTM's documentation and, upon closer examination, found that 56 of the 58 different FDA regulations identified by ASTM cited obsolete ASTM standards or that, in some cases, cited ASTM standards that had been withdrawn. Most regulations involved direct and indirect food additives, although two of the affected regulations involved medical devices. Consequently, through this rulemaking, FDA is revising the device regulations identified by ASTM that contain obsolete or withdrawn ASTM standards to reflect the current ASTM standards designations. FDA will update the citations for the food additive regulations in a separate rulemaking.
This direct final rule amends §§ 801.410(d)(2) and 801.430(f)(2) by incorporating by reference into the regulation the updated standard as follows:
- Section 801.410 Use of impact-resistant lenses in eyeglasses and sunglasses—The agency is amending paragraph (d)(2) by removing "ASTM Method D 1415-68 'Test for International Hardness of Vulcanized Rubber,' " and by adding in its place "ASTM Method D 1415-88, Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—International Hardness," and also by removing "ASTM Method D 412-68 'Tension Test of Vulcanized Rubber,' " and by adding in its place "ASTM Method D 412-97, Standard Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Rubbers and Thermoplastic Elastomers—Tension,".
- Section 801.430 User labeling for menstrual tampons—The agency is amending paragraph (f)(2) by removing "(ASTM), D 3492-83, 'Standard Specification for Rubber Contraceptives (Condoms)" ' and by adding in its place "(ASTM) D 3492-96, Standard Specification for Rubber Contraceptives (Male Condoms)".
In addition, FDA is updating in § 801.410(d)(2) the address for the American Society for Testing and Materials.
II. Additional Information
In the Federal Register of November 21, 1997 (62 FR 62466), FDA described when and how it will employ direct final rulemaking. FDA believes this rule is appropriate for direct final rulemaking because FDA views this rule as making noncontroversial amendments to existing regulations, i.e., adopting revised ASTM methods for certain medical device regulations, and FDA anticipates no significant adverse comments. Consistent with FDA's procedures on direct final rulemaking, elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is publishing a companion proposed rule to amend the relevant medical device regulations. The companion proposed rule is substantially identical to the direct final rule. The companion proposed rule provides a procedural framework within which the rule may be finalized in the event the direct final rule is withdrawn because of any significant adverse comments. The comment period for the direct final rule runs concurrently with the comment period of the companion proposed rule. Any comments received under the companion proposed rule will be considered as comments regarding the direct final rule.
FDA is providing a comment period on the direct final rule of 75 days after January 24, 2000. If the agency receives any significant adverse comments, FDA intends to withdraw this final rule by publication in the Federal Register of a document within 30 days after the comment period ends. A significant adverse comment is defined as a comment that explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without change. In determining whether a significant adverse comment is sufficient to terminate a direct final rulemaking, FDA will consider whether the comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. Comments that are frivolous, insubstantial, or outside the scope of the rule will not be considered significant or adverse under this procedure. In addition, if a significant adverse comment applies to an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and that provision can be severed from the remainder of the rule, FDA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of a significant adverse comment.
If FDA withdraws the direct final rule, all comments received will be considered under the companion proposed rule in developing a final rule under the usual notice-and-comment procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.). If FDA receives no significant adverse comments during the specified comment period, FDA intends to publish a confirmation notice in the Federal Register within 30 days after the comment period ends. FDA intends to make the direct final rule effective June 7, 2000.
III. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined, under 21 CFR 25.30(i) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and Start Printed Page 3586benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 12866 classifies a rule as significant if it meets any one of a number of specified conditions, including having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or adversely affecting in a material way a sector of the economy, competition, or jobs, or if it raises novel legal or policy issues. The revised ASTM standard citations that FDA is adopting in the medical device regulations reflect minor changes to the currently listed methods in those regulations. The updated citations are the result of periodic reapprovals of long-standing test methods or standards and should have no significant adverse impact on those who use the standard. Thus, the rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, and so is not subject to review under the Executive Order.
Under section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), for any proposed rule for which the agency is required by section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act or any other law to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking, the agency is required to analyze regulatory options that would minimize any significant economic impact of a rule on small entities. The agency has published, in the companion proposed rule published elsewhere in this Federal Register, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. Because the companion proposed rule is a proposed rule for which a general notice of proposed rulemaking is required, and therefore is subject to the RFA, the agency will consider any comments it receives on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis in the companion proposed rule when deciding whether to withdraw this direct final rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This direct final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
Interested persons may, on or before April 10, 2000, submit to the Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments regarding this final rule. The comment period runs concurrently with the comment period for the companion proposed rule. Two copies of any comments are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the office above between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. All comments received will be considered as comments regarding the proposed rule and this direct final rule. In the event that the direct final rule is withdrawn, all comments received regarding the companion proposed rule and the direct final rule will be considered as comments on the proposed rule.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 801End List of Subjects Start Amendment Part
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,End Amendment Part Start Part
PART 801—LABELINGEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation forEnd Amendment Part
2. Section 801.410End Amendment Part
3. Section 801.430End Amendment Part Start Signature
Dated: December 29, 1999.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1404 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]


text:
Big East alums have their say
League's breakup gets many opinions
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
Credit: Kelvin Ma
With the Big East holding its final tournament in its present form, some of the players who helped make the conference were looking at the end of an era with different emotions.
There was apathy from Celtics Jeff Green (Georgetown) and Terrence Williams (Louisville) and regret from Bobcats Kemba Walker and Ben Gordon, both of UConn, which was left behind by the Big East's non-football schools.
"That's where the money is," said Green of the football effect, which a while back cost the league Boston College and Miami, among others, and had Syracuse and Louisville bolting for the ACC, too. "Those other schools are going to go where the money's at. It is what it is. I'm just worried about what Georgetown's going to do as far as wins. That's all I care about."
The form of the new Big East, headlined by the so-called Catholic 7, is of no concern to Green.
"I could care less," he said. "As long as they're winning."
A few lockers away, Williams echoed some of the same comments.
"I don't care," he said. "The Big East don't mean nothing to me. To me, when I played, it was the best conference in the country. We had sometimes four teams ranked in the top 10. I feel like we were definitely the top conference then. And now you want to break it up and teams want to leave. I don't know what's going on with that. Teams that are leaving are teams that have been there for a long time. I can't understand that."
Williams laments what's being lost.
"I had fun in the Big East," he said. "You were competing against the best players every night. The Big East was a grind. It was a war. It was great to me. And we won it.
"I'm hoping the ACC will become how the Big East was when I was there with all these great teams. But I don't think the ACC's physical, to be honest. The Big East is physical. You get fouled, hurt. They don't call nothing."
Gordon, meanwhile, was unaware of the conference changes.
"I didn't know that," he said. "So any schools with football will be out? Since my last year you started to see things changing. We wouldn't play certain teams as much. That was just the beginning of things breaking up. I wasn't aware of that, but it will be one of the last memories of having all of the teams you remember from the Big East.
"I grew up a kid in New York watching all of the big games — the Villanovas, Georgetown, UConn, Pittsburgh, Syracuse. And when I got to UConn that was something in the back of my mind. I wanted to perform on the level of those teams and some of the great guys in that conference. Now it's not going to be the same teams. It will be really different, and take getting used to. It makes me a little bit sad, man."
Walker had perhaps the greatest individual Big East Tournament performance in history, scoring 130 points over five games in UConn's run to the tourney title in 2011 and eventually winning the NCAA championship.
"I'm excited that I got a chance to be a part of it," he said. "It's always been the one league, always one of the best conferences every year. It's never going to be the same. It always had the best teams and was really competitive. It always had a lot of teams going to the NCAA tournament. It's definitely a bummer that it's not going to be the same anymore."
Of the football breakup, Walker said, "I try not to get into all that, but I guess the important thing is what's best for the whole university. Of course, I would love for those guys to stay in the Big East, but I don't know. I'm just excited that I got a chance to be in the Big East.
"But, man, rivalry week is not going to be the same anymore."