text:
The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals today overturned the November 2010 verdict against Hands' private equity firm Terra Firma over its £4.2bn acquisition of EMI, after ruling that District Judge Jed Rakoff incorrectly instructed jurors on English law.
The court ruled that Hands deserves a new trial where he can seek damages, after losing his claim that the bank defrauded him into overpaying for EMI Group at the peak of the buyout bubble.
Terra Firma bought the debt-laden EMI at auction in May 2007, borrowing £2.6bn from Citi to finance the deal.
But in December 2009, Mr Hands alleged that Citi's David Wormsley, a former friend, had tricked him into overpaying for EMI by telling him that Cerberus Capital Management had put in a high bid, when in fact Cerberus had decided to withdraw.
In February 2011, Citi seized EMI after Terra Firma defaulted on its loans to the bank and was unable to service EMI's debt load.
Citigroup yesterday said it was "confident" it will "again prevail in trial as Citi's conduct in the EMI transaction was entirely proper".
A spokesman for Terra Firma said: "We continue to believe we have a strong claim."


text:
Is "vestigial organ" a term that should be retired?
|March 7, 2014
|Posted by News under Convergent evolution, Intelligent Design, News
Get a look at this item from The Scientist :
For decades, researchers and marine fisheries managers have considered the adipose fin—a small protuberance between the dorsal and tail fins—a vestigial organ, a relic of a bygone evolutionary era. But a study published today (March 5) in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B shows that bony versions of these structures have evolved independently and from more than one ancestor, suggesting that the adipose fin could play a subtle, yet vital, as-yet unidentified role in fish.
Then there's "Elephant's extra "toe": Another "vestigial organ" bites the dust – in this case, literally
Your appendix: The king of vestigial organs has a job again
Is the term retained so people can attract attention to a new article by pointing out that such and so was thought to be vestigial but really isn't? Or is the term itself a vestige of Darwinism? Perhaps it is itself the only example of the idea?
Follow UD News at Twitter!
Hatchery salmon have their adipose fin clipped off(under sedation), to distinguish them from wild salmon, who are protected. If the fin is not vestigial, maybe this isn't such a good idea:
67 Responses to Is "vestigial organ" a term that should be retired?
1QueriusMarch 7, 2014 at 8:48 pm
Darwinists here in previous posts still seem to defend the term with great passion even in the face of incontrovertible evidence to the contrary.
My beef is that they claim things are "vestigial," implying that they are sure that there's no function for what they claim is an evolutionary artifact, when the truth is that they don't know. Worse yet, the list of "vestigial" structures is shrinking with boring regularity.
I've read that a list of 150 (or 180) vestigial structures were presented as evidence at the Scopes trial. My argument is that brushing off structures as vestigial impedes scientific progress, whereas with an ID paradigm, these same structures would be investigated under the assumption that they do have some, as of yet unknown, function.
The Darwinists here typically have emitted clouds of ink (pun intended) at my argument, and after I arm wrestle them down, they walk away announcing that they've "won" the argument.
It is the 'unscientific' for man to think that if he does not know the function of something then it must not have a function.
Stability and Maneuverability in the Knifefish – video
"Bad Design" Debunked in a Fish: It Actually Achieves the Impossible – November 7, 2013
Excerpt: the team reported that these extra forces are not wasteful after all: they allow animals to increase both stability and maneuverability, a feat that is often described as impossible in engineering textbooks.
Leave it to Darwinists to seize upon such ignorance of function as proof for their theory. Moreover please note how plastic the word 'vestigial' becomes in the hands of a Darwinist:
From Jerry Coyne, "Evolution-of-the-Gaps" and Other Fallacies – Jonathan M. – December 5, 2012
Excerpt: Coyne anticipates the typical response to the argument from vestigiality:
"Opponents of evolution always raise the same argument when vestigial traits are cited as evidence for evolution. "The features are not useless," they say. "They are either useful for something, or we haven't yet discovered what they're for." They claim, in other words, that a trait can't be vestigial if it still has a function, or a function yet to be found.
But this rejoinder misses the point. Evolutionary theory doesn't say that vestigial characters have no function. A trait can be vestigial and functional at the same time. It is vestigial not because it's functionless, but because it no longer performs the function for which it evolved. (p. 58)"
But surely, by Coyne's reckoning, this loose definition of "vestigiality" would entail that every organ and structure is vestigial, since, in Coyne's view, all traits have evolved from something else. As Jonathan Wells explains in his own review of the book,
"If the human arm evolved from the leg of a four-footed mammal (as Darwinists claim), then the human arm is vestigial. And if (as Coyne argues) the wings of flying birds evolved from feathered forelimbs of dinosaurs that used them for other purposes, then the wings of flying birds are vestigial. This is the opposite of what most people mean by "vestigial."
"There are, according to Wiedersheim, no less than 180 vestigial structures in the human body, sufficient to make of a man a veritable walking museum of antiquities."
-evidence submitted to the Scopes trial
"The thyroid gland, pituitary gland, thymus, pineal gland, and coccyx, … once considered useless by evolutionists, are now known to have important functions. The list of 180 "vestigial" structures is practically down to zero. Unfortunately, earlier Darwinists assumed that if they were ignorant of an organ's function, then it had no function."
"Tornado in a Junkyard" – book – by former atheist James Perloff
Vestigial Organs: Comparing ID and Darwinian Approaches – July 20, 2012
Excerpt: A favorite criticisms of ID is that it is a science stopper. The opposite is true. The Live Science article shows that the "vestigial organs" argument has not changed for over a century, since Wiedersheim coined the term and listed over a hundred examples (in 1893). Evolutionary theory, in fact, has been worse than a science stopper: its predictions have been flat out wrong. Only a handful of alleged vestigial organs remains from Wiedersheim's original list, and each of those is questionable.
Throw on top of that the fairly recent debacle of Junk DNA, which many Darwinists still argue passionately for in spite of ENCODE's findings, and the harmful effect of Darwinism on science starts to become more readily apparent:
Junk No More: ENCODE Project Nature Paper Finds "Biochemical Functions for 80% of the Genome" – Casey Luskin – September 5, 2012
Excerpt: The Discover Magazine article further explains that the rest of the 20% of the genome is likely to have function as well:
"And what's in the remaining 20 percent? Possibly not junk either, according to Ewan Birney, the project's Lead Analysis Coordinator and self-described "cat-herder-in-chief". He explains that ENCODE only (!) looked at 147 types of cells, and the human body has a few thousand. A given part of the genome might control a gene in one cell type, but not others. If every cell is included, functions may emerge for the phantom proportion. "It's likely that 80 percent will go to 100 percent," says Birney. "We don't really have any large chunks of redundant DNA. This metaphor of junk isn't that useful.""
We will have more to say about this blockbuster paper from ENCODE researchers in coming days, but for now, let's simply observe that it provides a stunning vindication of the prediction of intelligent design that the genome will turn out to have mass functionality for so-called "junk" DNA. ENCODE researchers use words like "surprising" or "unprecedented." They talk about of how "human DNA is a lot more active than we expected." But under an intelligent design paradigm, none of this is surprising. In fact, it is exactly what ID predicted.
Comment and Music:
Steve Meyer's comment yesterday about the anti-ID 'COSMOS' seems apt:
"The problem with materialists is they think that in [the brief span of the history of modern science], science has got all the mysteries of existence figured out…. In fact, we are just beginning to uncover the scientific evidence that the material cosmos is not all there is."
Sarah McLachlan – Ordinary Miracle
OT: CPAC 2014 – Eric Metaxas, Author – video
4Jaceli123March 7, 2014 at 9:18 pm
Is it true that babies do not contain free will and so would this be considered vestigial because how do babies make decisions? BTW does free will not exist because we sometimes make unconscious decisions. Also is it true that we are not conscious of our memories and taht their stored in the brain because we are not conscious of these memories or words all the time. Doesn't this show we have no free will because we have to access this unconscious and since were not in control of this this shows no free will?
Well Jaceli123 if you have no free will, then what use is it to argue one way or the other? You have no choice to believe whether you have free will of not if materialistic determinism is true since you must believe whatever your molecules in your brain 'randomly' dictate to you to believe! 🙂
Dog, tail, and round and round we go!
Jaceli123, a bit of advice? Perhaps you should actually try to google some answers to these rather silly videos you fall prey to?
Let me google that for you
8Jaceli123March 7, 2014 at 10:07 pm
BTW when I mean unconscious act I mean scratching your head without being aware of it. BTW I did search up if babies have free will and I didn't find anything. How do you have choice when you unconsciously do something. I also cant find anything on how were not conscious of all are thoughts and memories. If the mind is not the brain were are all these thoughts stored and since we cant control this unconscious area of the brain we have no free will? That's what I also cant find. I think free will needs to be discussed at a real deep level of philosophical discussion. Not about stupid libet experiments but about everyday activities and actions.
9QueriusMarch 7, 2014 at 11:57 pm
No, I don't think such a discussion is significant. As ba77 says, if you have no free will, then any such discussion is pointless. If you want to go that route, read B.F. Skinner on Behaviorism.
Back on track, the topic being considered is labeling any structure as "vestigial" before it has been demonstrated that it definitely has no function or benefit, including repressed genes.
I agree that this Darwinist label should be retired because it consistently has impeded scientific progress.
10Jaceli123March 8, 2014 at 12:14 am
sorry about that I would love to discuss vestigial organs with you guys. I see that universal common descent has very good evidence from this as I see it. As well as Atavisms!
I do agree that natural selection cannot account for complex life but that complex algorithms and outside space time conscious minds can bring in new information into the quantum and molecular world. But We could debate vestigial organs.
11Jaceli123March 8, 2014 at 12:18 am
BA77 I see that you disagree with a common ancestor but I don't, as I see a lots of evidence for it. Querius now im not sure about your thoughts on this subject of vestigial organs and common ancestry.
12Robert ByersMarch 8, 2014 at 12:26 am
The lack of vestigial bits is a great point for creationism.
Evolutionists use the few as a sample to prove evolution.
Yet in reality there are so few in living/fossil creatures with vestigial bits that it suggests they never evolved.
if they evolved creatures should be crawling with bits and pieces of vestigials on the way out.
The very few show a truth.
marine mammals were land creatures.
Snakes had legs and island birds flew to the isles and then lhad wing atrophy.
The fossil record should be full and fuller of vestigial bits.
In fact its empty relative to numbers.
Yes Trex once walked on all fours but that a special case. Same as the kangaroo.
13Jaceli123March 8, 2014 at 1:23 am
I have to disagree with the lack of vestigial parts.
There's a good amount of them in nature around us today such as.
-Nails in manatees.
-Hind legs with feet found in whales.
-Hind legs and pelvis bones in snakes.
-Egg cracking teeth found in baby marsupials.
-Whip tail lizards having fake sex even though they lay eggs asexually.
-Dandelions vestigial reproductive parts.
-Amphibuas vestigial legs.
-Human sinuses.
-Human Philtrum
-Human Nails
I mean the list goes on!
14QueriusMarch 8, 2014 at 1:52 am
You don't get it. My point is how can you scientifically prove that, for example, human nails have no useful function?
I think mine do.
Beside feeling oh-so-good when I can scratch, maybe there's a function that you don't know about. For example
– Has anyone demonstrated that human nails have no function in human sexual response?
– Has anyone demonstrated that human nails do not have a function in opening nuts and fruit?
– Has anyone demonstrated that human nails are never an effective defense weapon?
– Has anyone demonstrated that human nails provide additional dexterity and a tool for extracting potentially dangerous splinters?
I think they do, and thus they are not "vestigial."
Waiting for your answer . . .
15eklektosMarch 8, 2014 at 2:26 am
Let me ask a question. My understanding of the 98% similarity claim for the human/chimp genome is that this is based on comparing the most similar and easily aligned portion of the genomes. But as humans and chimps use many of the same proteins wouldn't this be expected? Aren't the most significant differences to be found in the regulatory genes and genes for which we have not understood function?
Jaceli, just because something looks like it has no function does not mean it has none. There is no way to prove that that evolutionary belief has any merit. In fact, it is an anti-scientific belief that has done harm to many people!
How many people believed that foolish "scientific" claim and had their tonsils taken out before their function was understood?
The vestigial organ doctrine hinders research just like the now discredited evolutionary belief in junk DNA did! Usually when a theory's predictions are falsified, the theory is discarded, but evolution just flexes and adjusts so it can assimilate any contrary evidence. Convergent evolution is another example of this.
Besides, so what if an organ does not have a function? I see that more as evidence against evolution than for it. How do know if the organ didn't simply lose its function due to a mutation? How is breaking a good organ evidence for evolution?
Flightless beetles and blind cave fish are good illustrations of this. What this shows is that evolution is good at breaking things which the ID and creationist side have been saying all along. That agrees with our prediction!
As an evolutionist, you have the difficult job of showing that the organ is both functionless AND that it actually is an evolutionary leftover as opposed to simply being an original organ that broke down.
Please show us the evidence for your faith!
17James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 9:16 am
There is no one knowledgeable that I know of who claims that vestigial = no present function.
James Stanhope please note how plastic the word 'vestigial' becomes in the hands of a Darwinist:
From Jerry Coyne, "Evolution-of-the-Gaps" and Other Fallacies – Jonathan M. – December 5, 2012
Excerpt: Coyne anticipates the typical response to the argument from vestigiality:
"Opponents of evolution always raise the same argument when vestigial traits are cited as evidence for evolution. "The features are not useless," they say. "They are either useful for something, or we haven't yet discovered what they're for." They claim, in other words, that a trait can't be vestigial if it still has a function, or a function yet to be found.
But this rejoinder misses the point. Evolutionary theory doesn't say that vestigial characters have no function. A trait can be vestigial and functional at the same time. It is vestigial not because it's functionless, but because it no longer performs the function for which it evolved. (p. 58)"
But surely, by Coyne's reckoning, this loose definition of "vestigiality" would entail that every organ and structure is vestigial, since, in Coyne's view, all traits have evolved from something else. As Jonathan Wells explains in his own review of the book,
"If the human arm evolved from the leg of a four-footed mammal (as Darwinists claim), then the human arm is vestigial. And if (as Coyne argues) the wings of flying birds evolved from feathered forelimbs of dinosaurs that used them for other purposes, then the wings of flying birds are vestigial. This is the opposite of what most people mean by "vestigial."
The main issue with vestigial organs/ parts is one has to know what the original function was. And no one knows that.
20James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 9:56 am
The question is not about everything having evolved from something else; it's about the fact that characteristics identified as vestigial can be specifically tied to an ancestral characteristic. Function past or present might not be specificlly known, but before a characteristic is identified as vestigial, there is a pretty clear path.
21SteRusJonMarch 8, 2014 at 9:56 am
Jaceli123, mostly,
A few comments about vestigial organs. It may very well be that there are to be found vestigial organs in certain families and species. Without investigation, how would you know. The darwinian paradigm just went off half-cocked and declared there are many without any evidence.
As an example, the remains of the eyes of blind cave fish is often considered a vestigial organ. That is, what remains is of no use. But how do we know it has no use without investigation. It may very well be that, given the interconnection of pathways in the fish's development, that, if every trace of the eye's components were removed from the fish's genome, the fish would not properly develop. If that were to be the case, could the eye, even in the state of non-functionality as an eye, still be considered vestigial.
Even if all the components of the eyes of blind cave fish were found to be entirely superfluous to the cave fish's existence, that would be of no support to the case for darwinian evolution vs intelligent design. You see, dysfunction of previously functional features in various life forms is compatible with both unguided darwinian evolution and its opposite- intelligent design. (Intelligent design does not preclude broken parts.) What Darwin attempted to explain with his theory was the existence of a functional eye. (That is what intelligent design attempts to explain, as well.) Not its degradation into a dysfunctional vestige.
For someone to put forward vestigial organs in defense of the theory of evolution is a distraction. Pure and simple. It has been pernicious in that it has delayed the research that would have otherwise been long since done.
Atavism is a similar distraction. There is no reason that intelligent design prevents the "reappearance" of a characteristic. What needs to be explained is a characteristic's appearance in the first place. Whales, for instance, may simply be designed from a common template, mammalian, with certain components "re-purposed." Legs, for example. (BTW The "remnants" of the legs in whales does serve some purpose.) The issue here is still "How did the components of the process of making legs first arise?" Was it unguided natural process- culled genetic accidents? Or, rather, was some intelligence component required to make them appear.
The principal objective of Darwin was to explain the appearance of biological features of the organisms in the world around us with natural laws and "chance" events, only. It is the burden of the darwinian evolution proponents to demonstrate that natural law and chance event are up to the task. Irrelevant pointing to dubious vestigial organs and atavisms doesn't cut it.
Jaceli123, The only people who think whales have leg bones are ignorant evolutionists. Why can't those bones be remnants of flippers? "Oh noes Joes, they are legs because we evolutionists knows legs bones."
23James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 10:03 am
I'm a little surprised at Intelligent Design advocates having a problem with vestigial structures. You can argue that they are a result of design recycling or some such thing, but to deny them altogether seems to be a little bit inconsistent.
James Stanhope, perhaps as a Darwinist, you would care to actually try to understand the design argument before you proceed to try to tell us how we should prosecute it?
Stephen Meyer – The Scientific Basis Of Intelligent Design – video
Inference to the Best Explanation: A Common and Effective Form of Archaeological Reasoning – 2007
Our experience-based knowledge of information-flow confirms that systems with large amounts of specified complexity (especially codes and languages) invariably originate from an intelligent source — from a mind or personal agent.
(Stephen C. Meyer, "The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories," Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 117(2):213-239 (2004).)
The materialistic argument essentially appears to be like this:
Premise One: No materialistic cause of specified complex information is known.
Conclusion: Therefore, it must arise from some unknown materialistic cause
On the other hand, Stephen Meyer describes the intelligent design argument as follows:
"Premise One: Despite a thorough search, no material causes have been discovered that demonstrate the power to produce large amounts of specified information.
"Premise Two: Intelligent causes have demonstrated the power to produce large amounts of specified information.
"Conclusion: Intelligent design constitutes the best, most causally adequate, explanation for the information in the cell."
There remains one and only one type of cause that has shown itself able to create functional information like we find in cells, books and software programs — intelligent design. We know this from our uniform experience and from the design filter — a mathematically rigorous method of detecting design. Both yield the same answer. (William Dembski and Jonathan Witt, Intelligent Design Uncensored: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to the Controversy, p. 90 (InterVarsity Press, 2010).)
etc.. etc…
25SteRusJonMarch 8, 2014 at 10:31 am
"There is no one knowledgeable that I know of who claims that vestigial = no present function."
Seems to me the goal posts have been moved from where they were in Darwin's day.
26James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 10:43 am
Mr.77, Why would you assume that I'm a "Darwinist"? Is it possible to be at least sympathetic to the ideas behind ID but not prepared to accept YEC arguments?
SteRusJon, there are a great many ideas in science that have changed since Darwin's day.
James Stanhope,
"Why would you assume that I'm a "Darwinist"?"
Duck test, i.e. looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck. Probably is a duck! 🙂 Please feel free to state your exact position so as to differentiate yourself from a neo-Darwinist and avoid any confusion. Moreover, the vestigial organ argument is not a YEC argument but was born purely out of Darwinian thought. In so far as it touches on functionality it impinges on ID proper!
28James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 11:21 am
Mr. 77, If you're suggesting that some form of loyalty oath is expected, I'm afraid I'll have to disappoint you. I'm not sure I have an "exact position" on anything that confines me to agreement with any give type of groupthink.
As far as ID is concerned, I believe that the general idea of what seems to be focused complexity requiring design has merit and is worth investigation. With all due respect, I'm not quite ready to accept you as an authority on what constitutes "ID proper." I do know however that the rejection of vestigial structures as being vestigial seems to be a common them amongst YEC commentators. I don't know why a structure can't be both vestigial (in the evolution sense) and designed.
James Stanhope,
"I'm not sure I have an "exact position" on anything that confines me to agreement with any give type of groupthink."
whenever you decide to form a rigid argument one way or the other, for or against anything, let me know. In your undefined state, it is hard to know what you complaint is exactly. You lean towards Darwinism in order to make your argument and then when it suits your purposes you back off from being committed to it so as to try to drive a wedge between the vestigial argument of Darwinist and ID proper. Your form of argument is disingenuous to put it mildly. You are trying to have your cake and eat it to. ,,, I'm done playing your stupid game!
The reason evolutionists call them 'vestigial' is that they cannot come up with a mechanism that would have evolved them. Indeed, why would nature evolve something that does not convey a clear survival advantage and do it multiple times to boot?
Darwinists are the true anti-science religionists.
31Jaceli123March 8, 2014 at 1:01 pm
SteRusJon I do not disagree with you at all about how these specified complex systems arose in one of my comments I state this and I agree that vestigial and Atavistic legs are the result of loss traits. What I am debating is that some people disagree that theses are even legs found in whales even though they contain leg and feet bones. Tjguy I understand that we can not prove these functions to be completely useless but can draw scientific conclusions from common ancestry it simple shows previous parts from a ancestor. I do agree that this is not the result of natural selection acting on random mutations. As James Shapiro put that natural selection is only a purifier and a mechanism for variation.
32QueriusMarch 8, 2014 at 4:27 pm
And what about my refutation in #14 regarding your claim that human nails are "vestigial." After demonstrating that they might indeed have a useful function, do you agree that it is not correct calling them vestigial?
My point, as is most everyone else's here, is that simply not knowing the function for a structure is not a valid scientific justification for labeling them vestigial—an artifact of Darwinian evolution.
33James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 7:57 pm
Querius, The fact that a structure has a useful function is not evidence against its being vestigial. The human coccyx is a good example.
34QueriusMarch 8, 2014 at 8:09 pm
Really, James?
So, why in the Scopes trial were 180 structures identified as vestigial and evidence for evolution? Or to put it another way, since the ancestors of humans and apes have femurs, therefore by your definition femurs must be vestigial. Right?
35James StanhopeMarch 8, 2014 at 8:27 pm
Querius, The Scopes trial was 90 (or so) years ago. Believe it or not, science has advanced in the last 90 years.
The coccyx is a vestigial tail bone. It serves a present purpose of anchoring muscles, a purpose it may have served all along. You seem to think that all biological structures are allowed only a single function. Femurs are irrelevant.
James Stanhope, so you really think that you came from an ape? Where is your evidence save for in your imagination? You do know that the tail bone was nothing but a tail bone all along and any claim that it is a leftover monkey tail is purely an old wives tale built on imaginary evidence?
No, It's Not a Tail! – May 2012
Excerpt: In 2004, an important study was published in the journal Cells Tissues Organs. It studied 52 different human embryos at different stages of development, and it reassessed our knowledge of human embryonic development. In that study, the authors note: "The eminence produces the caudal part of the notochord and, after closure of the caudal neuropore, all caudal structures, but it does not produce even a temporary 'tail' in the human.",,, As you can see, then, the idea that human embryos have temporary tails during their embryonic development has been thoroughly debunked in the scientific literature. The only question that remains is how long evolutionists will continue to use this myth to promote their failing hypothesis.
Fact-Checking Wikipedia on Common Descent: The Evidence from Comparative Anatomy – Jonathan M. – October 2011
Excerpt: "1. The human coccyx (tail bone) is functional inasmuch as it provides essential anchorage points for muscles.""2. The rare congenital deformities where a human is born with a tail-like appendage are usually resultant from a type of fatty tumor which has no relationship to a monkey's tail."
In fact, contrary to another old wives tale built upon imaginary evidence, embryological development for each species, including chimps and humans, is unique:
Icons of Evolution 10th Anniversary: Haeckel's Bogus Embryo Drawings – January 2011 – video
The mouse is not enough – February 2011
Excerpt: Richard Behringer, who studies mammalian embryogenesis at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas said, "There is no 'correct' system. Each species is unique and uses its own tailored mechanisms to achieve development. By only studying one species (eg, the mouse), naive scientists believe that it represents all mammals."
Gene Regulation Differences Between Humans, Chimpanzees Very Complex – Oct. 17, 2013
Excerpt: Although humans and chimpanzees share,, similar genomes (70% per Tomkins), previous studies have shown that the species evolved major differences in mRNA expression levels.,,,
Evolution by Splicing – Comparing gene transcripts from different species reveals surprising splicing diversity. – Ruth Williams – December 20, 2012
Excerpt: the papers show that most alternative splicing events differ widely between even closely related species. "The alternative splicing patterns are very different even between humans and chimpanzees," said Blencowe.,,,
A Listener's Guide to the Meyer-Marshall Debate: Focus on the Origin of Information Question -Casey Luskin – December 4, 2013
Excerpt: "There is always an observable consequence if a dGRN (developmental gene regulatory network) subcircuit is interrupted. Since these consequences are always catastrophically bad, flexibility is minimal, and since the subcircuits are all interconnected, the whole network partakes of the quality that there is only one way for things to work. And indeed the embryos of each species develop in only one way." –
Eric Davidson
Understanding Ontogenetic Depth, Part II: Natural Selection Is a Harsh Mistress – Paul Nelson – April 7, 2011
Excerpt: The problem may be summarized as follows:
— There are striking differences in the early (embryonic) development in animals, even within classes and orders.
— Assuming that these animals are descended from a common ancestor, these divergences suggest that early development evolves relatively easily.
— Evolution by natural selection requires heritable variation.
— But heritable variations in early development, in major features such as cleavage patterns, are not observed.
Darwin or Design? – Paul Nelson at Saddleback Church – Nov. 2012 – ontogenetic depth (excellent update) – video
Text from one of the Saddleback slides:
1. Animal body plans are built in each generation by a stepwise process, from the fertilized egg to the many cells of the adult. The earliest stages in this process determine what follows.
2. Thus, to change — that is, to evolve — any body plan, mutations expressed early in development must occur, be viable, and be stably transmitted to offspring.
3. But such early-acting mutations of global effect are those least likely to be tolerated by the embryo.
Losses of structures are the only exception to this otherwise universal generalization about animal development and evolution. Many species will tolerate phenotypic losses if their local (environmental) circumstances are favorable. Hence island or cave fauna often lose (for instance) wings or eyes.
Response to John Wise – October 2010
Excerpt: But there are solid empirical grounds for arguing that changes in DNA alone cannot produce new organs or body plans. A technique called "saturation mutagenesis"1,2 has been used to produce every possible developmental mutation in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster),3,4,5 roundworms (Caenorhabditis elegans),6,7 and zebrafish (Danio rerio),8,9,10 and the same technique is now being applied to mice (Mus musculus).11,12 None of the evidence from these and numerous other studies of developmental mutations supports the neo-Darwinian dogma that DNA mutations can lead to new organs or body plans–because none of the observed developmental mutations benefit the organism.
per ENV
37Jaceli123March 9, 2014 at 1:40 am
Hey guys sorry I couldn't respond sooner Im busy today packing for a ski trip. Anyway Queries I think vestigial forms are something that have been reduced in functionality. Like whip tail lizards exhibiting sexual behavior even though they reproduce asexually. This shows a behavior reduced to little to no function. Also I did find something interesting a long time ago that blue footed boobies contain a nasal cavity and a sinus cavity even though the top of their beak is covered up and sealed, showing a previous ancestor had a open nasal cavity.
38QueriusMarch 9, 2014 at 2:37 am
Querius, The Scopes trial was 90 (or so) years ago. Believe it or not, science has advanced in the last 90 years.
Exactly. And what was considered "vestigial" then is not considered "vestigial" now. But "vestigial was and is (by your own posts) falsely deemed evidence for Darwinism, by argument out of ignorance—we don't know its function, so it must not have one.
How can you *know* that any biological structure absolutely does not have any function (remembering repressed genes)?
The coccyx is a vestigial tail bone. It serves a present purpose of anchoring muscles, a purpose it may have served all along. You seem to think that all biological structures are allowed only a single function.
No, my point is that biological structures that have a purpose (or more than one) are not "vestigial" simply because some presumed ancestor has a homologous structure perhaps used for a different purpose.
Femurs are irrelevant.
Not at all! Femurs are part of a locomotion and manipulation structure in apes, a reproduction structure in whales, and a locomotion structure in humans. Are femurs vestigial in humans because they no longer support manipulation, or reproduction? What exactly was the original use of the femur—it was a fin for swimming, right? Thus, femurs are "vestigial" in land animals by one common definition.
I still haven't received a response from you regarding whether human nails are vestigial! Instead, I get one on boobies, and if I answer boobies, I'll get one on fruit bats, followed by kangaroos, amoebas, and then slime molds.
So, one more time. Are human nails vestigial?
James Stanhope:
The coccyx is a vestigial tail bone.
That is your opinion. And it is only an opinion.
40Jaceli123March 9, 2014 at 9:55 am
Queries, human nails are not vestigial in a sense because we could live with out them quit frankly. I understand nails have some kind of function but thats not what vestigial means.
a bodily part or organ that is small and degenerate or imperfectly developed in comparison to one more fully developed in an earlier stage of the individual, in a past generation, or in closely related forms.
Source: http://i.word.com/idictionary/vestige
See I meant that nails show less use because of our reptilian ancestors who used nails to reach onto surfaces. So yes I know it has some function but it has been reduced in a function because of past evolutionary generations.
41James StanhopeMarch 9, 2014 at 10:13 am
Querius, the 180 structures cited in the Scopes trial were not individually identified. There was just a statement made to that effect, so it's not possible to evaluate the claim. The German anatomist Robert Wiedersheim published a book in the 1890s in which he specifically identified 86 human vestigial structures. It was apparently this list that was later expanded to 180, but by whom and to what end isn't clear.
Wiedersheim, by the way, defined vestigial structures as "wholly or in part functionless" and that they have "lost their original physiological significance." I think those ideas are considered accurate today, so you can see why I said that your reference to the femur is irrelevant.
42James StanhopeMarch 9, 2014 at 11:23 am
Mr. 77, I do not think that I came from an ape. I have documentary evidence that my mother, a member of the species Homo sapiens, gave birth to me. :>)
Then why are you defending the absurd Darwinian proposition that the tailbone is vestigial? Much like the word vestigial itself, it seems your position is extremely plastic when it suits your purposes. ,, Just sayin,,,
To call something vestigial just begs the question.
Just because evolutionists can behave like apes and reptiles doesn't mean humans, apes and reptiles share a common ancestor. 😛
45QueriusMarch 9, 2014 at 12:50 pm
James and Jaceli123,
Notice from each other's posts that there are two distinct Darwinist (or neo-Darwinist) definitions for vestigial:
A. Having no function, a vestige of the evolutionary process.
B. Having a different biological function by process of evolutionary adaptation.
The change from definition A to definition B is the result of numerous embarrassments and falsifications including mislabeling organs such as ductless glands, etc. as "vestigial."
However, the "new" definition of vestigial is tautological since Darwinism asserts that all structures have had some previous, not necessarily identical function. This provides Darwinism with additional "flexibility" to create support for any evolutionary pathway. Very handy, though scientifically useless.
Yes, the human femur by definition B has indeed lost some functionality present in ancestral organisms and is thus, strictly speaking, vestigial.
Jaceli123—I noticed that you still haven't answered my question of whether you still think human nails are "vestigial" in light of my argument to the contrary.
From a Darwinist perspective, would I be more likely to survive if my nails were reptilian? <—warning: trick question. 😉
46James StanhopeMarch 9, 2014 at 2:01 pm
Mr. 77: If you can explain why you think that the idea of vestigial structures is "absurd" in your own words, I might be able to answer you.
Joe: I've seen where you have, several times, insisted that ID has no problem with evolution, so who are you referring to as "evolutionists"?
Querius: The information from Wiedersheim in #41 above is still valid wrt the definition "vestigial" in biology. The fact that some might be confused isn't surprising, as it's not an entirely simple concept, and there might grey areas.
James Stanhope, I have a very specific question I want answered scientifically. I want to know if it is possible to produce humans by purely material, i.e. Darwinian, processes. Making up a 'just so story' about how you think 'man lost his tail' is about as unscientific as can be. I could care less what your imagination and subjective opinion can tell you what could have happened. Yet such absurd story telling is all we ever hear from Darwinists. We are never EVER presented with any actual empirical evidence that would indicate that Darwinism is even remotely feasible. Perhaps you feel that making a story up as to how man lost his tail is scientific, but I find your gullibility to believe in such tripe absurd.
Excerpt: "There are no detailed Darwinian accounts for the evolution of any fundamental biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations"
(James Shapiro, molecular biologist, National Review, Sept. 16, 1996).
,,,The term "just-so story" was popularized by Rudyard Kipling's 1902 book by that title which contained fictional stories for children. Kipling says the camel got his hump as a punishment for refusing to work, the leopard's spots were painted on him by an Ethiopian, and the kangaroo got its powerful hind legs after being chased all day by a dingo.
Kipling's just-so stories are as scientific as the Darwinian accounts of how the amoeba became a man.
Lacking real scientific evidence for their theory, evolutionists have used the just-so story to great effect. Backed by impressive scientific credentials, the Darwinian just-so story has the aura of respectability.
Biologist Michael Behe observes:
"Some evolutionary biologists–like Richard Dawkins–have fertile imaginations. Given a starting point, they almost always can spin a story to get to any biological structure you wish" (Darwin's Black Box).,,,
Where's the substantiating evidence for neo-Darwinism?
Darwinian Evolution is a Pseudo-Science – Part II
48James StanhopeMarch 9, 2014 at 3:41 pm
Mr. 77, I'm not going to have a conversation with a wall of cut-and-paste. Again, if you can explain in your own words why you feel the idea of vestigial structures is absurd, I can try to answer. Otherwise there's no point.
James Stanhope, I have explained why your position is absurd in my own words. Because you don't like the fact that I carefully referenced the fact that Darwinists have no empirical evidence after I stated my case to you is of no importance to me. I don't write to please your personal tastes! The fact that I made clear to you, for all to see, and will gladly repeat for any onlookers (if there be any), is that the 'vestigial structure argument' you are using, such as 'how man lost his tail', is not science but is merely a imaginative 'just so story'. In fact empirical science, when properly utilized, is the 'bottom line' that is SUPPOSE to put an end to such imaginative speculations. That you would defend such imaginative 'story telling' as to telling you anything useful scientifically is what is absurd. As far as empirical science is SUPPOSE to be practiced, I could care less what you imagine could or could not have happened, and only care what you can demonstrate to be true. Darwinian evolution is far from such an empirical demonstration:
"Charles Darwin said (paraphrase), 'If anyone could find anything that could not be had through a number of slight, successive, modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.' Well that condition has been met time and time again. Basically every gene, every protein fold. There is nothing of significance that we can show that can be had in a gradualist way. It's a mirage. None of it happens that way. – Doug Axe PhD.
Nothing In Molecular Biology Is Gradual – Doug Axe PhD. – video
50Eric AndersonMarch 9, 2014 at 4:23 pm
James Stanhope:
I do know however that the rejection of vestigial structures as being vestigial seems to be a common them amongst YEC commentators. I don't know why a structure can't be both vestigial (in the evolution sense) and designed.
I can't speak for YEC commentators, but you are quite right that ID does not have any problem with vestigial structures. Designed things break down all the time and there are some decent examples of things that are likely structures that have fallen out of use over time. Not a problem from an ID perspective.
The general issue with the claim of vestigial structure, however, arises from the following confluence: (i) vestigial structures are regularly trumpeted loudly and broadly as some kind of definitive proof against design, which is nonsense, (ii) the history of arguing for purposeless evolution (and against design) by pointing to vestigial structures has an extremely poor track record — one by one over the decades most things have fallen off the list and many things that were previously thought to be vestigial are now known to have function; as a result, at some level the claim of vestigial structures often functions as a claim from ignorance;* (iii) even if something appears not to have current function, that doesn't mean that it doesn't have some other purpose (e.g., things that are needed early on in the organism's development, scaffolding leftovers from construction, etc.).
So, no, ID doesn't have any problem with vestigial structures. But the real bona fide vestigial structures are far fewer, far less clear, and far less compelling than most proponents of purposeless evolution would have us believe.
* Incidentally, the claim of pervasive amounts of junk DNA falls in this category. It is essentially a claim of vestigial structure, founded upon, in some cases, a lack of understanding and in other cases, on a philosophical assertion that we should "expect" a lot of junk.
51QueriusMarch 9, 2014 at 4:32 pm
I'm really trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.
– Your simply saying that Wiedersheim's claims are still valid doesn't make them so.
– All the subsequent discoveries about organs that were formerly labeled vestigial at the time have been demonstrated to be functional, thus falsifying his claims based on the classic definition of vestigial (having no function, a vestige of the evolutionary process).
– Asserting that the label "vestigial" is a complex concept and that there are gray areas doesn't elicit any confidence in its scientific utility. It's simply a vestige of the rotting planking of the drifting 19th century ship, Darwinism.
As in Monty Python's dead parrot skit, the parrot is not resting, pining, or stunned. It's dead, and science should move on ahead.
52Eric AndersonMarch 9, 2014 at 4:36 pm
One commenter offers this definition of vestigial:
a bodily part or organ that is small and degenerate or imperfectly developed in comparison to one more fully developed in an earlier stage of the individual, in a past generation, or in closely related forms.
That is perilously close to being circular.
In many cases of alleged vestigial structures, the proponent of purposeless evolution is using them to claim evidence for the truth of unguided, purposeless evolution (indeed, let's just acknowledge it, this is the primary interest in vestigial structures at all).
Yet, the very definition of vestigial assumes that the vestigial structure came from some "earlier stage" or from some "closely related form." In that sense, one cannot logically claim that something is vestigial because it is related to some other form or some earlier stage and then say that the existence of the vestigial structure demonstrates evolution (i.e., demonstrates that there was some earlier stage or some earlier form).*
The idea of human finger nails being a left over from reptilian ancestors, for example, being nothing more than unmitigated, unsubstantiated, pure storytelling.
* This is a good parallel case to the concept of "homology", which so often functions as nothing more than a circular restatement of the original claim, assuming as the precedent the very conclusion that needs to be reached.
53QueriusMarch 9, 2014 at 4:44 pm
Eric noted that
Incidentally, the claim of pervasive amounts of junk DNA falls in this category. It is essentially a claim of vestigial structure, founded upon, in some cases, a lack of understanding and in other cases, on a philosophical assertion that we should "expect" a lot of junk.
Dr. Ohno in his paper on "junk" DNA, speculated that this DNA was the remnants of "fossil" genes. That this is being falsified by modern science seems to evoke no concern to the Darwinist true believers who spring to Dr. Ohno's defense.
James Stanhope:
Joe: I've seen where you have, several times, insisted that ID has no problem with evolution, so who are you referring to as "evolutionists"?
The people who think that alleged vestigial parts is evidence for common ancestry. 😉
Evolutionists are people who accept blind watchmaker evolution, ie that blind and mindless processes such as natural selection (which includes random/ happenstance mutations) and drift can account for the diversity of life starting from some simple replicators. And that our existence is just because of many improbable coincidences.
IOW evolutionists are people heavily vested is Special High Intensity Training. You have to be to pawn that nonsense off as science and get away with it for years.
The question, "are any organs really vestigial?" could be asked. For many years various organs of the human body were called "vestigial" by evolutionists, that is, the last vestiges of organs that supposedly once had a use, but were no longer needed because of the claimed advance up the evolutionary ladder.
Of interest in this regard is the small gland that is shaped like a pinecone and hence called the "pineal" gland. Though it is located near the center of the brain, it is not part of the brain. "Until very recently" it was thought that "the pineal in man served no biologic purpose and was merely a vestige," reported the journal Hospital Practice. Now the pineal has been shown "to possess a unique ability to produce melatonin." This is a substance that affects the brain, the reproductive system, as well as the pituitary, adrenal and thyroid glands.
Scientists believe that in man the pineal gland "exerts a control over the body, specifically by regulating the body clock." (Science Digest, September 1972) The pineal does this evidently by secreting various chemicals. Thus it is believed that the pineal gland may chemically supervise many of the involuntary activities of the human body, such as helping to make body temperatures increase during the daytime and decrease at night.
Another gland long thought to be useless is the thymus. In an article entitled "The 'Useless' Gland That Guards Our Health," Reader's Digest stated: "For at least 2000 years, doctors have puzzled over the function of a pinkish-grey bit of tissue lying just below the neck and behind the breastbone—the thymus gland. . . . Modern physicians came to regard it, like the appendix, as a useless, vestigial organ which had lost its original purpose, if indeed it ever had one.
"In the last few years, however, the dogged detective work of a small band of Americans, Britons, Australians and Swedes have cracked the thymus enigma. These men have proved that, far from being useless, the thymus is really the master gland that regulates the intricate immunity system which protects us against infectious diseases. . . ."But is the thymus the only organ regulating our immunity system? Recent experiments have led researchers to believe that the appendix, tonsils and adenoids [once these too were tagged as vestigial] may also figure in the antibody responses."
56James StanhopeMarch 9, 2014 at 5:54 pm
Querius, as long as you keep insisting on a "classic" definition of vestigial that's inaccurate, your arguments will always be correct.
57James StanhopeMarch 9, 2014 at 5:56 pm
Joe, Why is the idea of vestigial structures in compatible with your version of evolution? If evolution is a result or consequence of design (and I won't argue that point) why should there not be vestigial structures?
58Jaceli123March 9, 2014 at 6:26 pm
Queries I agree with Eric. No nails are not useless but have been reduced in function overtime. Thats my responded. Now let's discuss something other than nails. As I listed in one of my first comments or post 13. I listed that Amphibuas legs can come into the category of a vestigial body part. Heres a picture of these legs and from observation you should determine that theses legs are reduced to little to no function!
Picture: http://www.ispot.org.za/node/156725
Joe, Why is the idea of vestigial structures in compatible with your version of evolution?
It isn't. As I said I am all for vestigial rear flippers in cetaceans. Finger nails on humans? No.
So it all depends on the structure and the context. As I calling something vestigial just begs the question.
From a design PoV something modified and used for some other function wouldn't be vestigial.
60Robert ByersMarch 9, 2014 at 6:57 pm
ID and others AMEN to vestigial bits. This yEC loves them. they tell a truth about biological change. its reasonable and true evidence for change.
yet not evidence for evolution.
in fact if evolution was true THEN biology should be crawling with vestigial bits upon vestigial bits! Instead they are few and far between to such a poverty as to demand a conclusion evolutionary change has never happened.
marine mammals did cHANGE from landlovers and marsupial fetus teeth show indeed they were first placentals. thats why they look identical to placental types.
yes cave fish came from non cave fish. Etc
The equation is being missed by you guys.
The few are a sample for the poverty of evolution evidence by vestigial bits.
The sample for evolution , if true, should be vestigial bits in everyone and a great deal.
nary a rib but a unexplained bump should be the tale.
61QueriusMarch 9, 2014 at 7:06 pm
In #45, I pointed out that there are two definitions of "vestigial." The classic definition fits the word "vestige." The more modern definition fits all biologic structures that are believed to have developed from another structure.
For example, it's now generally believed by Darwinists that the flagellar rotor from Yersinia pestis evolved into a Type III secretion system in some bacteria. The motility of the bacteria with this novelty was compromised in favor of acquiring a structure for injecting toxins into eukaryotic cells.
Thus by the second definition, Type III secretion systems are vestigial, due to the loss of the original function, motility.
One can argue that vestigiality only applies to an overall loss of function, which would be hard to assess, since for some organisms motility confers greater viability than toxicity, but for others the reverse is true.
My point is that the term, vestigial, has lost it's utility in the modern Darwinist pantheon outside of a sentimental attachment. Maybe you can find a new definition to keep the discredited term on life support. 😉
62QueriusMarch 9, 2014 at 7:30 pm
Jaceli123 @58 continued . . .
No nails are not useless but have been reduced in function
Do you think you would rather have reptilian nails—would they provide more functionality for you?
I listed that Amphibuas legs can come into the category of a vestigial body part. Heres a picture of these legs and from observation you should determine that theses legs are reduced to little to no function!
How would I know from visual inspection that the appendages on Scelotes bidigittatus aren't actually Highly Functional sense organs, able to detect minute chemicals from decaying organisms that it can more easily locate for scavenging?
If I assumed that these structures are vestigial, I'd be less likely to investigate them to find out what advantage that they convey!
And that's why the ID paradigm promotes scientific progress while Darwinism inhibits scientific progress.
Did you want to bring up fruit bats or kangaroos next? 😉
63Eric AndersonMarch 9, 2014 at 11:20 pm
Jaceli123 @58:
No nails are not useless but have been reduced in function overtime.
Why would we think that? Has anyone ever found empirical evidence that humans once had more reptilian nails or more functional nails? Do we have any idea what kinds of changes would be required in the organism to change the one into the other?
Ironically, I had never really thought about nails and whether they might have function, but since reading this exchange earlier today I have been noticing how often I use my nails for something functional, and it is quite often — certainly with my hands.
There doesn't seem to be any evidence that nails constitute a "reduced function" vestige of some progenitor species. It is of course possible — in a purely hypothetical sort of way — that human nails devolved from some reptilian counterpart.
But, until then, it is just a story. Pure, unadulterated, unsubstantiated, just-so story.
64Jaceli123March 10, 2014 at 10:55 am
Alright look let me repeat myself. IM NOT A DARWINIST. ID is compatible with universal common descent. So this means that if there is vestigial organs it shows how natural selection is a terrible mechanism like James Shapiro said. Lets make that clear I don't think natural processes can produce new function just variate. Ok so yes I know you use nails so do I but i'm saying that vestigial organs show a degrading system from common descent until a conscious mind inserts information into the system. So human nails are useful but show less use because of common descent and natural selection. I hope I made myself clear. BTW sorry for the long responses, driving stoping and unpacking is a hassle so Im kind of busy but am driving all day so ill be free for a discussion.
65James StanhopeMarch 10, 2014 at 12:43 pm
Jaceli123, There seems to be some here who think that anyone who disagrees with them must be a Darwinist.
So human nails are useful but show less use because of common descent and natural selection.
Question begging 101.
And it is true that ID does not argue against universal common descent. But that concept (UCD) still needs a way to be tested.
67Eric AndersonMarch 10, 2014 at 2:07 pm
Thanks for the clarification. I fully agree that ID is compatible with vestigial organs, as I mentioned to James @50. I also agree with you that there is precious little evidence that natural processes can produce new function.
My point was more limited. Namely, that while there are a small number of true vestigial structures, (i) the idea of pervasive vestigial structures is largely based on made up stories coupled with a lack of understanding of the engineering principles involved, (ii) most structures that, over the years, have been claimed as vestigial have, with more knowledge, turned out not to be in any meaningful sense, and (iii) even the existence of true vestigial structures is not evidence for a broader evolutionary storyline — particularly when the definition of vestigial sometimes put forward is essentially circular.
Anyway, sounds like we are in agreement on most of this. I think what jumped out to some of us about the human nail example, is that it falls in the category of a made up story. There are probably some better examples, like the blind cave fish or something, that are closer to a true vestigial structure.
But I agree with your broader point that common descent and natural selection could result in a loss or diminishment of function over time.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
This is not where to go if you want tea and fripperies but if you want a good cuppa, "Lancashire lass" Jessica Avery (owner) has you covered. The tea selection is not lacking. There are good, filling sandwiches and a few salads available as well as a small but consistently delicious selection of sweets. The afternoon tea service is just wonderful and of course includes true clotted cream. The shop can get quite busy in the afternoon as Platte and 15th is quite a trendy little neighborhood.
- 2401 15th St
- Denver, Colorado
- (303) 455-4832
- http://www.houseofcommonstea.com


text:
At the tender age of 21, Johann Smith is aware of fate's fickle nature.
Just as he was poised to play in Toronto last summer, a third-degree ankle sprain deprived Smith of an opportunity to represent the U.S. at FIFA's under-20 World Cup.
When word began to circulate this spring that Major League Soccer was eyeing Smith, several teams expressed interest. Little did Smith know that Toronto FC was among the suitors.
"Bags and bags of ability,'' TFC head coach John Carver said in assessment of Smith. "He's got bags of pace, but he needs to control that."
Having suited up for his latest side and having experienced a sampling of Toronto's mosaic, Smith is relishing his moment in Hogtown, however long it may last.
"Life works in mysterious ways,'' Smith said yesterday after TFC ended its training session at BMO Field.
"It's weird when you think I'd be playing here last year and now I find myself here on a professional basis.
"Who knows what the future holds for me, but hopefully it's positive."
Smith's initial impressions of the TFC organization and Toronto are positively positive.
He traversed the city's streets Wednesday and later attended Canada's 1-1 draw against Jamaica, where Smith's family has deep roots.
"At this point, I feel very comfortable,'' he said. "I'm happy to be here and maybe my career will kick-start here."
A midfielder who also can play forward, Smith says he has developed a bond with teammate Rohan Ricketts, providing TFC with two players who can attack from both flanks.
TFC acquired the speedy Smith last week by sending allocation money and by swapping allocation places with New England, a team that invades BMO Field tomorrow.
Smith made his TFC debut Sunday in a 2-0 away loss to New York. Carver was reluctant to start Smith on Sunday in the wake of fitness concerns.
"Since the end of May, he's played 90 minutes and that includes the 45 minutes he played for us,'' Carver said of Smith, a one-time member of the English Premier League's Bolton Wanderers who was on loan to several teams.
"He's a young lad, but we've got him at the right age."
Like any aspiring footballer, Smith's dream is to return to England and become a full-time member of a top-division club.
For now, his focus is on TFC and evolving as a player.
"I'm always hard on myself,'' Smith said. "I'm never satisfied and I'm always trying to get better."
Speed is one of Smith's biggest assets, a dimension that puts pressure on defences and allows for scoring opportunities.
Perhaps Carver's greatest challenge is to harness Smith.
Carver, though, wants players with pace and power, and Smith fits the bill.


text:
Interviewer: Normally, when a guy of your age starts acting there has to be gossip about them and at least one of their heroines. Is it because you're already married that there isn't any gossip about you?
Dulquer: My ultimate girl is Amaal. I don't know exactly why… I love her a lot… it's been that way even before we got married. Even now, I think she's prettier than any other girl I've seen. So I don't think I'll be distracted. I'm very much in love with her.
This has been a Mrs. Amaal Nizam Salmaan appreciation post. Also happy birthday to her :)


text:
Toyota Landcruiser SUV 2005 for sale
181 Views
Silver 5 Door Prado
Translate this page :
- Vehicle
- 2005 Toyota Landcruiser
- Body
- Silver 5 Door Suv
- Engine
- 4000cc Automatic Petrol Engine
- Odometer
- 212,000 kms
- Stock Number
- 8544
- Safety Rating
ANCAP Safety
Based on rating for 03+ models with dual front+side+curtain airbags
- Fuel Economy
- Yearly Cost: $ 3700 (source: Fuelsaver)
Seller Details
- Dealership:
- Dealer
- Address
- Southland
Very Popular and Versatile SUV
Loads of Room
8 Seats
Excellent for Towing
Air Bags - Multi
Air Conditioning
CD Player 6 stacker
Central Locking
Climate Control Dual
Cool box
Cruise Control
Electric Windows
Keys - 1 Only
MP3 Plug-In
Seats - 8
Stability Control
Alloy Wheels
Bonnet Protector
Roof Rails
Running Boards
Tinted Windows
Tow Bar
Window Tints
4 Wheel Drive
ABS Braking
Down Hill Descent Control
NZ new
Traction Control
Large Selection of Vehicles Still the Key to Success
Today the focus is still the same as it has always been - which is to strive to have a strong selection of vehicles on offer and meet customers' requirements to ensure that they will come back and buy a vehicle time after time. Their promise of 'Customer Satisfaction Guaranteed' is more than just talk they believe that the after sales service is just as important to ensure a happy customer.
Repeat Business is about looking after customers
"Things have changed hugely in this industry over the last few years and what I see is that the guys who just want to make a fast buck and not look after their customers are going out of business. We've been doing business in Gore for many years and we know that it is important to look after our customers to ensure we are here for the long haul." says Director Ken Small
Tailored Packages to Suit the Customer
Millennium Motors can offer tailored MTF finance packages and also Autosure Mechanical breakdown cover for real peace of mind. They have also just introduced a new level of service with selected vehicles that meet the criteria to be part of their 5 Star Approved range.


text:
Go to site | Reader's comments
|Bonus sites:
|Live Shows:
|MPEG, Windows
Limited Trial:
$2.95/3 days
$29.83/30 days
Review of Handjob Porno:
The hand. It's such a beautiful instrument. Without it, we could not write. We could not type. We could not drive. And we could not masturbate. Let's thank whoever created the hand, because rubbing against a pillow can get boring after a while! And most of all, let's thank that mysterious creature because without a hand, there would be no handjobs. And without handjobs, there would be no handjob porno.
Handjob Porno is a video heavy website with a big focus on handjobs. As a theme, this has been done before, many times before actually. Lately it seems like handjobs are more popular than blowjobs. Hands off! Well, I think that it is cool and refreshing... the only thing that is weird is that handjobs usually only pop up in handjob websites. Regular sites haven't quite caught on yet, we love our handjobs!
When you first sign onto Handjob Porno, you are given a semi-confusing main page. There are lots of links, and at first I didn't really know where to go. There are links to leased sites, members favorite sets, and stuff all over the place. As a member and porn browser, theres only one option you will really be interested in. And that is the handjobs option. Once there, you get a little better organization and understanding of the site, but the design was still very weak and not worthy of my praise at all!
The videos are definately the focus here on Handjob Porno. The thumbnails are done very well here on the site, and the setup is similar to that of a reality site. You really get good thumbnails and good options here. You can download segments of the videos, or the full video. The full video is only available in WMV whereas the segments are also available in MPG format. The segments also have the option of high or low quality, whereas full video is only available in high. The videos are not too big in size, and download relatively fast. You can probably download everything in one night, even though there is a lot of content here. Overall, the videos are very easy to acquire, now lets talk about quality!
The videos, at high, full quality, are 696k. They look really good, they're not perfect but for what this site is they are very good. When I wrote notes for this site, I said "damn good quality" and I think I'm going to stand by that statement. They run very smoothly, and the watermark issue that I complain about in the other network sites isn't as bad here, with the lettering being a lot smaller, at least to these old eyes! So basically, you get, well, damn good quality here, not perfect but still very good.
The pictures here are good. I'm kind of confused. The pictures are really good, and the network sites didn't have vidcaps really. But here, some of that pictures have that blur to them. I'm not sure if its because the girls hand is moving so fast that the camera can't keep up, or if it's because these are vidcaps. But otherwise, the pictures are good, quality pictures worth saving on your hard drive.
The girls on Handjob Porno are stunning. Absolutely stunning. I really liked the girls here, and the site seemed to do a good job in doing the selection process. I've been over my theory for handjob porns before, but the quick version: girls doing handjobs have to be beautiful. Nobody wants to watch 10 minutes of an ugly girl stroking cock. The more beautiful, the better the video. Especially if the girls are going to be clothed or not showing much of their naked bodies. Here, it works out nicely. The action is, well, handjobs silly! They don't last long enough to get boring, but there isn't a whole lot of variety in the videos either. No toys, sock puppets, or anything else that could have been stupid and interesting.
At the time of review, there was a huge 34 sets of content. The site claims to have weekly updates, but with no timestamps or anything of the sort, there is absolutely no way to prove that matter. MPI is a member of a porn network. Included in this network is My Porn Interview, 1st Lesbian Experience, Candi From The Block, Handjob Porno, and Real MILF Sex. This is a good network with some relatively original themes.
A huge number of videos, and beautiful girls, make this the handjob fetishes paradise. And those who aren't into pleasures of the hand, check out some of these videos, and next time you see a hot girl, you might be looking at her hand, instead of her legs, ass, or breasts! Myself, I'm tired of just handjobs right now, I mean it's a good idea a first and can be quite erotic to look at, but the genre doesn't have much more to offer in my eyes. If you are looking for a site that only focuses on handjobs though, this is a decent one.
Reader comments:
There are no comments for this site. Be the first to comment...
Please login to leave a comment


text: Having trouble installing major league baseball 2k12 to my USB hdd. I've backed up all my other games so I know my USB loaders work but for some reason this game stops at 94% when using USB loader GX and 14% on CFG loader. Havent tried wii flow yet. Fyi I successfully soft modded with mauifrogs guide and it went flawlessly. Anyone else having this issue or should I do something different???? Thanks.


text:
Jim Rickards, who recently has gotten massive media exposure on everything from the JPM Silver manipulation scandal, to the Greek default, was back on CNBC earlier with one of the most fascinating insights we have yet heard from anyone, which demonstrates beyond a doubt why any attempt by Europe to print its way out of its current default is doomed: "Look at what Soros did to the Bank of England in 1992 - he went after them, they had a finite amount of dollars, he was selling sterling and taking the dollars, and they were buying the sterling and selling the dollars to defend the peg. All he had to do was sell more than they had and he wins. But he needed real money to do that. Today you can break a country, you don't need money you just need synthetic euroshorts or CDS. A trillion dollar bailout: Goldman can create 10 trillion of euroshorts. So it just dominates whatever governments can do. So basically Goldman can create shorts faster than Europe can create money." Just wait until Europe finally realizes that the CDS "speculators" had all the cards in the poker game all along. And we hope Europe listens to the man: being LTCM's GC he knows all about failed bail outs.
Jim Rickards: "Goldman Can Create Shorts Faster Than Europe Can Print Money"
- Printer-friendly version
- May 10, 2010 12:04 PM
- 85
Euro now under 1.28 as I type.
Might be a very interesting afternoon.
EUR/USD dropping like a rock.
"EUR/USD is meaningless. Look at the markets."
Harry Wanger
So much for his prediction on capping the well head.
Time to boycott BP products.
Off topic but critical...
Urgent: Deepwater Horizon Spill Solution
Hi Everyone. Please see:
This is me and I have a "Eureka" moment breakthrough to help solve the Deepwater Horizon crisis.
Please publicize this URL widely. E-mail it to your contact lists, send it to your senators, appropriate contacts in media, post it on other blogs like oil drum where you might be a member, industry contacts etc. Time is of essence and the solution is awesome.
If Tyler or Marla see this, they can mail it to higher contacts in media or put it somewhere on the site. I'd even pay for a prominent ad spot for the day if needed.
I'm getting it out on as many outlets as possible.
I know there are folks here from the industry or tangentially or historically connected with it. Please don't e-mail me for details at this point, will take too much time to respond.
If you've read any of my comments, you know I'm sane. Right? ;-)
It's real and needs to get seen/heard at the highest/right places.
Thanks in advance.
are you going to post this in every thread on this site? i'm sure your idea is great, so just call the fucking company or government and get on with it. i'm not sure what you expect people here to do about it.
If you are genuinely concerned just post the general details so it can be reviewed, otherwise STFU.
Please don't say his name to many times he may reappear like Beetlejuice.
lol + 1000
I dare hime to come back:
Wanger Wanger Wanger
Thanks a lot for sharing such an valuable stuff.
Masters Degree Programs
Life Experience Degree
Online Diploma
"Gold Is Money, and Nothing Else."
- JP Morgan, testifying under oath to Congress before the Pujo Commission, 1913
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away that power, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear — as they ought to in order to make this a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let them continue to create deposits."
Sir Josiah Stamp (1880-1941), one time governor of the Bank of England, in his Commencement Address at the University of Texas in 1927. Reportedly he was the second wealthiest individual in Britain.
Mobilis In Mobili -Nemo
To fix the problem of too much debt that looks to be on an inadequately serviceable trajectory . . . throw more debt at it. Brilliant. Kick the can until when?
These countries need to restructure (yes, default). It is not the end of the world and the sooner the better. They've all done it before. Yes, I know it puts the future of the EU in question. But putting it off for 3 years actually increases the likelihood.
Or is it really all about saving the banks, yet again?
The EU was officially created to facilitate the free flow of people and commerce between members, and unofficially created to allow a small ruling elite to control a nice chunk of the industrialized world. You didn't think TPTB would relinquish some of their power so Greece and a few other misfits could break from the EU in order to default and/or devalue their own sovereign currencies, did you?
They've got carbon credits to skim, cash transactions to outlaw, direct taxation transfer payments to implement, taxpayers to fleece, and pensions and precious metals to confiscate. So many ways to screw the middle class, so little time.
I was in my bedroom tying my tie when Mr. Rickards uttered those wonderful words. I was transfixed, waiting for a giant hook to come from stage right and yank him off the air. Even "Morning Joe" didn't seem to really understand what Rickards was saying.
When it was over and I looked in the bedroom mirror to check my appearance before leaving, I saw that I had tied a triple Windsor knot and the end of the tie was only 4 inches from the knot. Whoops! My first belly laugh of the day.
At least you didn't give yourself an "Alcatraz Ascot" while listening to this
Mr. Rickerts, excellent comment from an esteemed person. Honesty and Gravitas?
Goldman would still have to find the sucker to take the other side of the bet.........it could be the ECB itself........
Best and Brightest
Can you say 'Naked'?
The earlier article basically said it all; 100% profitable trading days.
Listen, and understand! GS cohorts are out there! They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They do not feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they, the Cohorts of Lord Blankfein absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.
Remember its not in the interest of the parasite to kill the host organism. Goldman is the rentier class, but they pull the levers for Fed/Treasury, such a small thing really, demanding a fair kickback out of Greece, where the ratings agencies put the bid under those austerity bonds. In turn the EU picks up the bill. We can bleed everybody dry, is this a great country or what?
I think the parasite has figured out this beast is on its last legs. Better to gorge now, lay 200,000 eggs and find another victim passing by shortly.
oh and i love Zoiberg. this is like a guy laying in the street bleeding and the vampires licking the blood off the pavement.
Enough - if Europe believes its own Bullshit there is only one option.
Put up the capital walls and keep the barbarians out.
A trading bloc without external boundaries is not a trading bloc but a collection of vassal states.
The Anglo Saxon economies can create money without savings and force their only western rival to respect the rules that they created and force it to print money.
Will it allow New York and London to drag the west into the mire once again ?
Jim Rickards should have his own financial channel.
Maybe it can be channel 5000...for $5000 Au.
maybe it can be real interviews with actually important insightful questions instead of just the usual CNBC starfucking.
Mark Heines: We are up 400 points, whats wrong with you people, shut up!!
Cheeky Bastard [in response to the above statement]: I will eat your heart and sell your women to slavery, slaughter all your horses and poison your 5th avenue lands.
"Conan, what is best in life?"
Conan - "To crush your enemies, have them driven before you as slaves, and to hear the lamentations of the women."
Pete (from Big Island Snake House): It is not so important that I win, but that I am the only winner, and that everyone else is a loser.
Did Joe just squeal like a bitch?
Yes, he did
He wanted them to "shut up!" because they were distracting him while he clicked his red heels together chanting "there's no place like home, there's no place like home!"
Does GS -
1. plunder the individual countries one at a time
2. plunder all EU countries together via USD/EUR
3. plunder both while declaring "The devil made me do it"
Yes, and now we know the mechanizm of control towards that elitist state of nirvana, "one-world governance". It is all PLANNED.....
Its a very good question - who is the remaining counterparty necessary for these synthetic bets to come into existance?
A holds B's dollars and A wants his own dollars back, because B has nothing for him to buy. He goes to B and says, I want you to exchange these B dollars for my own A dollars, you go out in the market and get me enough A dollars to complete the transaction. (B has to repatriot his dollars back into A dollars). This is fundamentally different than A redeeming Treasury Bonds which B sold him, because B would simply pay A in B dollars, which just kicks the can down the road.
Governments are willing to do this, ad infinitum, but it is private investors who hold the real dollars, and once some group, with enough capital starts the ball rolling it can't be stopped. Then of course you set up some hedges, which leverage the position you are pressing.
But if A retains a GS to 'help' him get A dollars back, A is enabling the WMD that is focused on destroying that with which he will be left with at the end of the day. Its one thing a few years back, when the mechanism was not clearly visible, but its the very definition of insanity to do it again now - maybe I just answered my own question.
Dear Raymond and others,
How naive are you?
They are there own counterparty!!
It is all orchestrated.
They have enough funds of their own, both onshore and offshore, and manage incredible offshore funds. Left hand doing business with the right hand, and we the people are so naive and dumb we think it is a real market.
It's all about power and money.
3. is definitely wrong, "it is god's work" remember? .edit, bugger, beaten to it, ...must type faster
Does GS -
1. plunder the individual countries one at a time
2. plunder all EU countries together via USD/EUR
3. plunder both while declaring "The devil made me do it"
Keep in mind the oil volcano is currently acting like a reverse printing press. Think of it is a currency cookie monster. Unemployment is going higher.
Awesome piece from Janet Tavakoli
Yes she has a fantastic body of work.......
Janet is smokin' hot.
Could Goldman be right this time?
Rickards presents his view rationally and coherently, and that's part of the reason why he's respected. He has command of his faculties and it's so much more difficult to undermine the message.


text:
League of Women Voters®
of St. Lawrence County
History of the League
League of Women Voters in St. Lawrence County
League in the News: League of Women Voters Celebrate 92 (Feb. 11, 2012)
The League of Women Voters was founded by Carrie Chapman Catt in 1920 during the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association. The convention was held just six months before the 19th amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified, giving women the right to vote after a 72-year struggle.
Those early suffragists were determined that with women voting they would be able to right all the things that were wrong with our American Society. They reasoned that ōwith how much was accomplished without the vote - how much more would be accomplished with the vote.ö They though this might take five years.
As an example of how wrong they were, the original Leaguers worked on Child Welfare Reform for 18 years. Currently the League has been working on court reform in NYS for 40 years.
The League started in 1920 in St. Lawrence County with local leagues in Canton, Potsdam and Ogdensburg. From the beginning its purpose was to educate all voters - men and women alike.
In a letter written on Dec. 20, 1920 to Mrs. Raymond Brown in NYS from Bernice Seavey concerning the League here in St. Lawrence County, ōThe Republican machine has a very strong hold here, the League is not popular with the leaders which make it doubly hard for women to come in, the experience some of the women had in the last election has started them thinking for themselves, no knowing where such a state will lead them.ö The letter goes on to describe Mrs. Robert Ford (Elizabeth Best Ford), ō...she is a fearless fighter and has access to the right people. The Republican County Committee just hated her work last fall, at the same time they would have given any price and a ground tour if she would work for them.ö
Elizabeth Best Ford was truly the founding mother of the St. Lawrence County League. She was the chair for several years, the regional chair for the area, and one of the letters in the League archive describes being motored to Ogdensburg by Mrs. Ford, to call upon each of the members to rejoin and to recruit new members. She lived part of her life at 35 E. Main Street in Canton, NY.
Referring back to the letter, Ms. Seavey told Ms. Brown that they couldnÆt do much till Spring, ōthe little towns are so far apart, snow, bad roads, and cold - the women will not get out.ö
Mrs. Julius Frank (Marion Sanger Frank) in Ogdensburg was listed as a club (sic) the League should be affiliated with. Also in the archives there is mention of not wanting the state League to remove the county for being a hopeless case - ōthese people are slow to accept new things.ö
On Aug. 15, 1922, a convention was held for the League in the County Courthouse. A printed program listed Mrs. Robert Ford as Chairman. Other name mentioned included: Mrs. Fred Mason, Miss Elizabeth McFalls, Mrs. Rhode Dunham, Mrs. Fred Harris, Mrs. Edward Park, and Mrs. E. P. Harris.
Richard Eddy Sykes gave the invocation. Ceylon Chaney, Supervisor, Welby Haile, County Clerk, and R. Porter Johnson, County Treasurer, presented a program on ōKnow Your County.ö Bertram Snell (local member of Congress) presented a program on ōThe Year in Congress,ö and James Dolan presented a program on the ōChildrenÆs Court.ö H. B. Chase spoke on joining a political party, and W. D. Ingram spoke about ōHow Women Can Assist the District Attorney.ö The convention featured a session on the independent voter and finished with Narcissa Cox Vanderlip talking about the League of Women Voters. Mrs. Vanderlip was the chair of the NYS League for many years.
Among the issues adopted at the convention:
The convention directed the National League to:
Dues to join in that year were $1 and at that meeting it was voted to set aside 10 cents of each dollar to promote a regional League, to include Franklin and Clinton Counties.
At another early League convention they held a tea for Jeanette Rankin, the first women to sit in the House of Representatives who was elected from Montana. Other letters and minutes mention that 17 towns has League members.
Throughout the 1920s and æ30s topics such as WomenÆs Place in Politics, her duties as citizen, and wining the peace predominated the topics studied. In 1938, ōKnow Your Countyö and a radio broadcast were mentioned. In 1939, the Milk Situation, the Life of Adolph Hitler, the St. Lawrence Seaway, and a discussion of venereal disease were on the agenda. In 1940, the League held a VoterÆs Forum on the radio, the County Budget, and the European Situation were part of their ōoutlook for work.ö
The League of Women Voters was a federation of separate organizations, linked by a national League, and governed by state Leagues. Each member who joined a local league was also a state and nation member. Each league would hold conventions, each would have elected officers, and be able to send members to the conventions of the higher level League.
Each League was also entitled to make recommendations for programs at the next level of League. At one time the LWVUS had 69 distinct programs that it was actively studying and taking action on - a program so unmanageable it was nicknamed the ōCan of Eels.ö Out of this the League adopted the ōPrincipalsö that guide the organization to this day.
Though most people associate the League with Voter Service, it has been a moderate, multi-faceted organization since its inception. The League supports the concept that every issue is a women's issue and that we reflect America's pluralism, rather than the narrow focus of single or limited issues. The League is slow to support issues, using the consensus method of agreement. For example, Alice Paul proposed the Equal Rights Amendment in 1923, but it took over 50 years for the League to support that first wave of social reformers. The League is a nonpartisan political organization; it does not support political parties or candidates only issues. Many League members have gone on to hold elective office, many hold appointed office, and some organizations even have a League seat on their boards.
Over the course of its life the county League has undergone many title changes as membership ebbed and flowed. In 1970 it was called the Canton-Potsdam League. In the past it had many different names, such as the Ogdensburg League, the Canton League, and the Potsdam League. Finally in the 1980's, in order to reflect the diversity of our membership, the name was changed back to the St. Lawrence County League, and in the 1990's we joined with Jefferson County.
Many thanks for Millie Whalen, former President of the St. Lawrence-Jefferson County League of Women Voters for this information.
For more information on the League of Women Voters:League History from the League of Women Voters of the US.
Last revised: February 11, 2012


text:
"His arrogant and out-of-hand dismissal of half the population of this country struck me at a visceral level, for it sullied the religion that he and I share. […] My first impulse was to rent an airplane towing a banner: 'Mitt Romney is not the face of Mormonism!'"
Mormon historian Gregory A. Prince on why Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is not the face of Mormonism in a blog post later cited by Nevada Sen. Harry Reid.
Read more in the Faith 2012 Quote Archives.
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks during a rally at Valley Forge Military Academy and College on Sept. 28, 2012 in Wayne, Pa.


text:
CafeMom Veteran
Click on a link to search for moms with the same information
Click on a link to search for other moms with the same favorites
I am 31, mom to 1 daughter who is 7 and married for almost 12 years. I love to meet other moms, especially since I am a military mom and constantly on the move. I love being a mom more than any job I have ever had, but it is by far the most exhausting. Since moving to El Paso, I hope to renew my love of hiking and would like to find other moms who enjoy it also. I enjoy the arts, especially theater, and hope to find other moms who enjoy it also, since my husband would rather not go. I am not sure what else I should write about, so if there is anything you would like to know just ask.
It's a birthday party and you're invited. Mommy Movers & Shakers turns 1 year old on February 1st.
If it's been a while since you visited the group, the party would be the perfect time to come back. Hope to see you.
Hi, Just dropping by to tell you we have missed you in Mommy Movers and Shakers and hope you'll drop by and let us know what you have been up too
Hi, I was just going through some of the EL Paso moms pages and came across yours :) I LOVE to hike! Have you been to Hueco Tanks yet? That's a nice place to hike, there are so many place here and in NM to go.
hello my name is randi and im from el paso, jus inviting u to stop by my page and check it out, well have a nice day!
I was just wondering if any other El Paso moms like to hike. I love to hike but for safety reasons dont like to go alone. Sometimes I take my daughter but I like to know a trail before taking a child on it. So if anyone likes to hike please send me a message.
Active Posts in All Groups


text:
The very lucky winner of the $25 gift card to the Vintage Pearl is...
# 18, Michaela @ Keep Calm and Carry On who said ,"I am soo excited to have found your blog! I am now a follower. Keep up all the creative work and inspiring projects! Thanks for offering this giveaway from Vintage Pearl!"
Congrats Michaela!! Please contact me via email at email@example.com so that I can get you in touch with the Vintage Pearl.
Thanks so very much to The Vintage Pearl for letting me host my very first giveaway! I hope that there will be many more to come... (aaahheemm, hint hint people who have shops or own businesses!)


text:
By Janet Driscoll Miller
Jun 11, 2013
More Articles by Janet
What is content curation? How can it benefit you as a marketer? This panel sought to answer those questions and featured Brent Csutoras of Kairay Media, Virginia Nussey of Bruce Clay, Inc., and Amy Vernon of Internet Media Labs.
Brent Csutoras
Brent led off the panel and discussed how marketers can use content curation for success. What exactly is content curation? It really comes down to two things: 1) you're finding the content of others around a particular topic and taking the best of that discussion and channeling it to your own audience or 2) doing the same thing but making that content your own — how you can improve it along with a source link to the original source.
What are the problems with content creation? Most people only do the bare minimum. Also, many articles are the same. Content curation, then, should be a place for you to get ideas for what you should be writing about. But also, you should be looking to stand out with your content. Try to become the preferred source.
How can you find content to curate? Check:
What types of content can you look for or curate?
How can you improve on the content? Where you have a quality image that can improve the content or summarize it, add that to the content. Add video to the story — can you find a video on YouTube that summarizes the story? See if anyone else has written about the same topic and share those in your content. Get new quotes for the piece.
Virginia Nussey
Virginia was next up on the panel and covered how content curation can boost SEO. Content is expensive to create, so how can you use content curation to cut back on expense and time to get great content? There's also a risk of creating duplicate content when curating, so be careful of that. Make sure your links are to high quality sources, too.
Make sure your content that you add also adds value. Content curation allows you to target the long tail of search too.
How can you use content curation?
Virginia shared a study where she looked at a piece of content that was duplicated, then a version that used an extra piece, like an image, and then a version that also had original content. The original content gave them a #1 ranking on that piece.
Amy Vernon
Amy wrapped up the panel by sharing tools to streamline the content curation process. I <3 tools.
Curation is setting specific criteria about what you'll put together and gathering it together then enabling others to see it. It is not aggregation or automation, like Paper.li.
You need the right tool for the right job.
Allows you to develop a list of people based on a topic that you determine. Others can also add to the list. You can choose which submissions to include in the list. It allows you to curate the best of a specific topic and allows others to add their favorites. You can enable voting and embed it into your site. All the links on the list are live which produces SEO value.
Allows you to pull together the best articles around the web on a topic. It's more like a social curation network and allows you to build pages of topics. The target audience is marketers, entrepreneurs and consultants. It's a highly educated audience.
A great site for curating content from and curating content on. It skews to a younger audience. It can be a blogging platform and/or a curation platform. It can also live separately from your site and cultivates community. It's very visual.
It's extremely visual and a big traffic driver. It enables group curation but you have no control over what others curate onto your group boards. The quality of image matters above all else on Pinterest.
Spundge pulls from different networks like Facebook and YouTube and you can create "notebooks" and pull in content based on keywords you choose.
Storify is similar to Spundge and used to curate events after the fact. It allows you to add a deeper context around the conversation.
Rebelmouse is somewhere between aggregation and curation. You can set very fine filters as to what is put in. You can add in or remove content, but it's more like an aggregator.
Other tools include Delicious, Pearltrees, Curata, and Curate.me.
Join over 4,000 marketers who receive actionable digital marketing insights.


text:
Clinical Reference / Therapeutic Strategies / Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis
Login Required
Please log in using your Derm101 Email/Username and Password to access the site.
Click here to Login | Subscribe to Derm101 Today!
Page Excerpt:
Click here to Login | Subscribe to Derm101 Today!
Page Excerpt:
Clinical Cases Case 1 Mild disease 9-year-old girl with chronic dry skin, who developed hypopigmented, fine scaling patches on the face and trunk She reports new pruritus of the skin No prior treatment Treatment Counseling on daily skin care (cleansing: soap-free cleanser over the body, mild soap only in the axilla, groin, hands, feet; moisturizing: […]


text:
Great, completely renovated living complex is located in one of the most beautiful parks in Rīga – Viesturdārzs (Viestura Garden), in the quiet part of the city centre, in Eksporta Street. Old Town and Quiet centre are just 5 minutes away. Nearby is a supermarket, restaurants, cafes, shops, as well as sports club and yacht club. In XIX-XX century the building was Rīga-General's summer house. Today it is completely renovated from basic to the historic appearance according to the old design, thus preserving the unique architecture and atmosphere of the old times. The renovation provided an opportunity to use the newest technologies and the best materials in the construction and finishing. As a result, the living complex is a unique combination of luxury living space equipped with all modern facilities in conjunction with the old, XIX century, classical-style manor house. The living complex has only 8 apartments. All apartments are spacious, bright, with a beautiful view towards park. The complex has an underground parking, a security and video surveillance. You have a chance to rent a spacious and beautiful two level apartment situated on the 2nd/3rd floor of the building. A spacious apartment with a total area of 297,8 m2 has a practical and well-considered layout. A beautiful two level apartment in the Viestura Garden - a great choice for a comfortable lifestyle!
|Property type:
|Total area:
|297.8 m²
|Direct reference:
|2 700 EUR (VAT included)
|Price / unit:
|9.07 EUR/m²
|Number of rooms:
|Number of bedrooms:
|Number of bathrooms:
|Total area:
|297.8 m²
|Floor / Total floors:
|2 / 3
|internet, phone
|Sanitary arrangements:
|bath, shower
|If you made monthly loan repayments rather than monthly rental payments, you could buy a home of your own today
Sale or rent your property faster in City24!Place ad
Want to create your own account?
Find out: +371 6749 1017 or firstname.lastname@example.com
15 May, 16:30
The quarter in the central part of Riga City, at Baznīcas Street section between Lacplesa (Lāčplēša) and Gertrudes (Ģertrūdes) Streets, is brought ...
13 April, 16:38
Premium housing (flats and houses) has been a stable market for several years, although lessees generally set the tone: it is definitely a tenant's ...
14 February, 13:53
The complex will be located on an area of 28 hectares and will include two towers more than 100 m high. In total, there will be 190 apartments with ...
27 January, 12:13
The Club Central Residence building at Baznicas Street, Riga, has become the most demanded premium class project in the capital city in 2016: 85 % ...
22 January, 18:00
Real estate company IMMOSTATE shall from now on operate as a full-service company by joining the commercial property company IMMOSTATE Commercial and ...
Find out your opportunity to receive a loan at SEB bank and apply for a free of charge consultation
Homer has a large collection of interior design ideas for your home, office or summer cottage.