text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Mar 16, 2010
|Filing date
|Oct 30, 2007
|Priority date
|Feb 6, 2001
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Mark A. Bennett, Peter C. Williams
|Original Assignee
|Swagelok Company
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (246), Non-Patent Citations (39), Referenced by (30), Classifications (9), Legal Events (3)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/522,814, filed on Sep. 14, 2006 entitled "Tube Fitting with Separable Tube Gripping Device" which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/467,444, filed on Aug. 5, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,108,288 entitled "Tube Fitting with Separable Tube Gripping Ring" which claims priority to International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US02/03431, filed on Feb. 6, 2002 entitled "Tube Fitting with Separable Tube Gripping Ring" which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/266,735 filed on Feb. 6, 2001 entitled "Tube Fitting with Integral Nut and Ferrule", and Ser. No. 60/329,943 filed on Oct. 17, 2002 entitled "Tube Fitting", the entire disclosures of which are fully incorporated by reference.
The subject invention is generally directed to the art of tube fittings.
Tube fittings are used to join or connect a tube end to another member, whether that other member be another tube end such as through T-fittings and elbow fittings, for example, or a device that needs to be in fluid communication with the tube end, such as for example, a valve. As used herein the terms "tube" and "tubing" are intended to include but not be limited to pipe as well. Any tube fitting must accomplish two important functions within the pressure, temperature and vibration criteria that the tube fitting is designed to meet. First, the tube fitting must grip the tube end so as to prevent loss of seal or tube blow out. Secondly, the tube fitting must maintain a primary seal against leakage. The requirement that a tube fitting accomplish these two functions has been the driving factor in tube fitting design for decades. A multitude of factors influence the design of a tube fitting to meet a desired grip and seal performance criteria, but basic to any tube fitting design will be: 1) the characteristics of the tubing that the fitting must work with, including the material, outside diameter and wall thickness; and 2) the tube grip and seal performance level required of the tube fitting for its intended applications. The goal is to design a tube fitting that reliably achieves the desired tube grip and seal functions within whatever cost constraints are imposed on the product by competing designs in the marketplace.
A flareless tube fitting generally refers to a type of tube fitting in which the tube end remains substantially tubular, in contrast to a flared tube fitting in which the tube end is outwardly flared over a fitting component. Flared tube ends are commonly encountered in use with plastic tubing and plastic tube fittings. The present invention is not primarily directed to plastic tubing or tube fittings because such fittings have significantly different challenges and material properties that affect the ability of the fitting to both grip the tube and provide an adequate seal. However, some of the aspects of the invention may apply to non-metal tube fittings, particularly the separable tube gripping element aspect.
Tube fittings that are intended for use with stainless steel and other metal tubing, for example, are particularly challenging to design in order to achieve the desired tube grip and seal functions. This arises from the nature of stainless steel which, in terms of typical commercially available tubing material, is a very hard material, usually on the order of up to 200 Vickers. Stainless steel and other metal tubing is also used for high pressure applications in which the tubing wall thickness is substantial (referred to in the art as "heavy walled" tubing). Heavy wall tubing is difficult to grip because it is not only hard but it is also not particularly ductile. Low ductility makes it more difficult to deform the tubing plastically so as to achieve a desired tube grip.
Tube fittings typically include an assembly of: 1) a tube gripping device, often in the form of a ferrule or ferrules, or a gripping ring-like structure, and 2) a pull-up mechanism for causing the tube gripping device to be installed on a tube end so as to grip the tube end and provide a seal against leakage. The term "pull-up" simply refers to the operation of tightening the tube fitting assembly so as to complete the assembly of the fitting onto the tube end with the desired tube grip and seal.
Usually a tube fitting is first assembled in a "finger tight" condition and then a wrench or other suitable tool is used to tighten or "pull up" the fitting to its final initial and complete assembled condition. The pull up mechanism most commonly used is a threaded connection of a female threaded nut component and a male threaded body component, with the tube gripping device being acted upon by these two components as they are threaded and tightened together. The body includes a tube end receiving bore with an angled camming surface at the outer portion of that bore. The most commonly used camming surfaces are frusto-conical such that the term "camming angle" refers to the cone angle of the camming surface relative to the tube end longitudinal axis or outer surface. The tube end is axially inserted into the body bore and extends past the frusto-conical camming surface. The gripping device is slipped onto the tube end and the nut is partially threaded onto the body to the finger tight position such that the tube gripping device captured axially between the camming surface and the nut. The nut typically includes an inward shoulder that drives the tube gripping device into engagement with the angled camming surface on the body as the nut and body components are threadably tightened together. The angled camming surface imparts a radial compression to the tube gripping device, forcing the tube gripping device into a gripping engagement with the tube end. The tube gripping device typically is to form a seal against the outer surface of the tubing and also against the angled camming surface.
The most commonly used tube gripping devices in stainless steel tube fittings today (the most commonly used are ferrule-type tube fittings) achieve tube grip by causing a front or nose portion of the tube gripping device to bite into the tube end outer surface. As used herein, the term "bite" refers to the plastic deformation of the tube gripping device into the outer surface of the tube end so as to plastically deform and indent the tubing with an almost cutting-like action to create a generally radial shoulder or wall at the front end of the tube gripping device. This "bite" thus serves as a strong structural feature to prevent tube blow out at high pressure, particularly for larger diameter tubing such as �″ and higher.
Over the years there have been numerous tube fitting designs that do not rely on a "bite" type action, but rather merely radially compress the tube gripping device against the tubing outer surface, some with the effect of indenting into the tubing without creating a bite. These designs are not suitable for high pressure stainless steel tube fittings. The most common commercially available stainless steel tube fittings especially for high pressure applications have historically been of two radically distinct designs of the tube gripping device-single ferrule tube fittings and two ferrule tube fittings.
A single ferrule tube fitting, as the name implies, uses a single ferrule to accomplish both the tube grip and seal functions. However, it is becoming increasingly recognized that these two functions are at odds with each other when designing a tube fitting that can meet a desired tube grip and seal performance criteria. This is because the design criteria needed to assure that the tube fitting achieves an adequate tube grip usually works against the ability of the single ferrule to also provide an effective seal. Consequently, although prior art single ferrule fittings can achieve adequate tube grip in some cases, this tube grip performance comes at the expense of having a less effective seal. One result of this situation is that some single ferrule tube fittings have been designed with additional components and techniques to achieve an adequate seal. Less than optimum seal performance is particularly noted in single ferrule fittings that attempt to seal against gas, and especially high pressure gas. Single ferrule tube fittings thus are usually more suited to lower pressure liquid applications such as hydraulics, however, even in such lower pressure applications single ferrule seal performance remains less than desired.
For single ferrule tube fittings, the biting action is usually associated with the single ferrule being designed to bow in a radially outward direction from the tube wall in the central region or mid-portion of the single ferrule body between the front and back ends thereof. The front end of the ferrule is driven against the angled camming surface of the body by the nut pushing against the back end of the ferrule. The bowing action helps direct the front end of the single ferrule into the tube end. The bowing action is also used to cause the back end of the ferrule to likewise engage and grip the tube end. This is accomplished usually by provided an angled drive surface on the nut shoulder that engages the back end of the single ferrule so as to radially compress the back end of the ferrule into a gripping action on the tube end. In some single ferrule designs, the back end of the ferrule apparently is intended to bite into the tube end. This back end tube grip is sometimes used with the single ferrule in order to attempt to improve the tube fitting's performance under vibration because the back end grip attempts to isolate down-tube vibration from affecting the front end tube bite.
The use of a back end tube grip actually works against the effort to grip the tube end at the front end of the single ferrule. Ideally, the single ferrule should be completely in three dimensional compression between the nut and the camming surface of the body. Providing a back end grip actually places a counter acting tension to the single ferrule that works against the front end compression being used to provide the tube grip. Additionally, the outward bowing action tends to work against the effort to grip the tube at the front end of the single ferrule because, in order to enable the outward bowing action, the single ferrule requires a lessened mass that is adjacent the tube gripping "bite". The outward bowing action radially displaces ferrule mass central to the ferrule body away from the tube end. Consequently, an outwardly bowed single ferrule fitting could be more susceptible to ferrule collapse, loss of seal and possibly tube blow out at higher pressures.
In order to achieve an adequate tube grip on stainless steel tubing, single ferrule stainless steel tube fittings have historically used a rather shallow camming angle of between ten and twenty degrees. This range of angles is referred to herein as "shallow" only as a term of convenience in that the angle is rather small. The shallow camming angle has been used in single ferrule fittings to obtain a mechanical advantage because the shallow angle provides an axially elongated camming surface against which to slide and radially compress the single ferrule front end to bite into the tube end outer surface. Hard stainless steel tubing material necessitated this elongated sliding camming action in order to be able to get the single ferrule to create an adequate bite for tube grip. Over the years, the single ferrule has been through hardened or case hardened so as to be significantly harder than the stainless steel tubing, however, the shallow camming angle is still used today in such single ferrule fittings to obtain a mechanical advantage from the ferrule sliding along the camming surface to produce the "bite" so as to assure an adequate tube grip. An example of a commercially available single ferrule tube fitting that uses a case hardened ferrule and a shallow camming angle of about twenty degrees is the CPI fitting line available from Parker-Hannifin Corporation. Another example is the EO fitting line available from Ermeto GmbH that uses a through hardened single ferrule and a twelve degree camming angle.
In some single ferrule designs, a non-conical camming surface has been tried whereby an attempt is made to simply press the ferrule against the outer surface of the tube end, thereby not creating a bite. The result in such cases however is a low grip or low pressure only fitting that are not well suited to stainless steel fittings.
The shallow camming angle and elongated camming surface and axial movement needed to achieve an adequate tube grip with a single ferrule fitting, however, compromises the ability of the single ferrule to achieve the seal function, especially in extreme environments and for sealing gas. This is because the front end of the single ferrule attempts to make the seal against the axially elongated camming surface. The radially outward bowing action causes a larger portion of the outer surface of the front end of the single ferrule to come into contact with the camming surface against which it is being driven. The result necessarily is a larger seal surface area between the outer surface of the single ferrule and the camming surface. This enlarged seal area causes an unwanted distribution of the sealing force between the single ferrule and the camming surface, and also creates a larger area for surface imperfections to allow leaks to occur. This is particularly a metal to metal seal issue (as contrasted to non-metal to non-metal seals: for example, in a plastic fitting it is usually desirable to provide an enlarged seal contact area because the more highly ductile plastic material can better form a seal between the two surfaces.)
Because historically the single ferrule fitting has used a shallow camming angle to achieve adequate tube grip, the less than optimum seal function is either tolerated as a recognized limitation on the application of the fitting, or additional features have been designed into the single ferrule fitting, most notably attempts to include one or more elastomeric seals with the single ferrule or with which the single ferrule cooperates to provide a better seal with stainless steel tubing. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,073,976 and 5,351,998. U.S. Pat. No. 6,073,976 illustrates a typical example of a single "ferrule" (called a "cutting ring" in the patent) fitting that attempts to solve the "seal" issue with added elastomeric seal. The U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,998 describes the benefits obtained by separating the tube grip and seal functions into two separate components.
A commercially available and highly successful two ferrule fitting used for tubing is commercially available from Swagelok Company, Solon, Ohio and is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,131,963 and 3,103,373 both of which are owned in common by the assignee of the present invention, the entire disclosures of which are fully incorporated herein by reference. In this two ferrule fitting, the tube grip and seal functions also are separately achieved by the use of two ferrules. The forward or front ferrule provides an excellent seal even against gas, and the back or rear ferrule provides an excellent tube grip.
The front ferrule achieves an excellent seal by camming against a shallow camming surface angle such as twenty degrees. This is because the front ferrule does not need to slide excessively on the camming surface in order to achieve a tube grip function. Likewise, the front ferrule is not case hardened because the primary purpose of the front ferrule is to seal and is not to bite into the tube end. Thus the relatively "softer" front ferrule achieves an excellent seal, particularly against gas, even though the body conical camming surface presents a camming angle of about twenty degrees.
The back ferrule achieves the tube grip function in the above noted two ferrule tube fitting. The back ferrule is case hardened to be substantially harder than the tube end. The front end of the back ferrule cams against a frusto-conical camming surface formed in the back end of the front ferrule. The ostensible angle of this camming surface is forty-five degrees, but due to the sliding movement of the front ferrule, the effective camming angle is actually a shallow angle of about fifteen to twenty degrees. Although the effective camming angle for the back ferrule is shallow, the back ferrule is not required to provide a primary seal (although it can form secondary or backup seals). The back ferrule also does not exhibit the undesired bowing action but rather grips the tube end as a function of a radially inward hinging action. As used herein, the term "hinging" refers to a controlled deformation of the ferrule such that a central region or mid-portion of the ferrule body undergoes an inwardly radial compression, as distinctly contrasted to a bowing or radially outward displacement. Thus, the effective shallow camming angle not only does not compromise the fitting seal capability, it actually substantially enhances the overall performance of the tube fitting especially for stainless steel tubing.
By using separate ferrules for each to achieve primarily only one of the key tube fitting functions, the two ferrule tube fitting achieves tremendous tube grip and seal functions. This prior art two ferrule tube fitting thus has enjoyed tremendous commercial success especially in the art of stainless steel tubing in part due to its performance characteristics such as high pressure rating on the order of 15000 psi, wide temperature rating of cryogenic to 1200� F. and in many applications a significant number of remakes (a "remake" refers to the loosening and re-tightening of a fitting after an initial pull-up).
U.S. Pat. No. 3,248,136 illustrates use of a single locking ring as opposed to a ferrule, wherein the locking ring acts against a surface having an angle that appears to be greater than twenty degrees or more, but the ring does not appear to plastically deform into the tubing but rather remains elastic so that the ring is designed to retain its original shape after pull-up, both of which are features that are unsuitable for stainless steel tube fittings of the type considered herein. Japanese utility model publication 44-29659 illustrates a tightening ring that appears to be intended to have a bowing effect and grip the tube at the front and back ends. The fitting does not appear to be applicable to stainless steel tubing as the tube is covered with a resin cover.
Attempts have been made to design tube fittings with a tube gripping element that separates during pull-up to function as a single element tube gripping device. Known designs place the breakaway element on the male threaded component. Additionally, the known designs either force the tube gripping element against a shallow camming surface angle or do not attempt to create a tube gripping bite into the tube wall. Thus the prior art designs suffer from the same limitations as the prior art single ferrule tube fitting designs.
Many applications and uses of the above-described two ferrule SWAGELOK tube fitting do not require such high pressure, temperature and remake performance characteristics. The present invention is directed to a new fitting concept that can meet lower performance characteristics without compromising overall fitting integrity and performance.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a new tube fitting concept provides an indication of completed pull-up by engaging an internal surface of one fitting component with another fitting component. In one embodiment, a tube fitting has a first coupling member and a second coupling member joined with the first coupling member. A tube gripping device is disposed between the first coupling member and the second coupling member such that assembly of said first coupling member with said second coupling member to a pulled-up condition causes the tube gripping device to grip and seal the tube. The first coupling member engages an internal surface of the second coupling member to provide an indication of completed pull-up.
These and other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of the preferred embodiments in view of the accompanying drawings.
The invention may take physical form in certain parts and arrangements of parts, preferred embodiments and a method of which will be described in detail in this specification and illustrated in the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and wherein:
In accordance then with one aspect of the invention, a tube fitting is provided having a tube gripping device that initially is integral with one of the coupling elements and upon pull-up separates therefrom to function as a single ferrule fitting. In the preferred embodiment, the tube gripping device or ferrule is integrally formed with a female threaded nut and is attached thereto by a frangible thin web portion that breaks as the ferrule cams initially against a camming surface of the male threaded component. As a single ferrule after separation, the ferrule acts against the steep camming angle surface of a male threaded body. The steep camming surface angle is particularly advantageous when the hardness of the tube gripping device has a ratio of at least about 3.3 times greater and preferably at least 4 times greater to the hardness of the tubing material.
Although a number of aspects of the invention are described herein as being incorporated into the exemplary embodiments, such description should not be construed in a limiting sense. For any particular application the various aspects of the invention may be used as required in different combinations and sub-combinations thereof. Furthermore, although the present disclosure describes and/or illustrates a number of design choices and alternative embodiments, such descriptions are not intended to be and should not be construed as an exhaustive list of such choices and alternatives. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate and understand additional alternatives and design choices that are within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Although the various embodiments are described herein with specific reference to the fitting components being made of stainless steel, and in particular 316 stainless steel, such description is intended to be exemplary in nature and should not be construed in a limiting sense. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the invention may be realized using any number of different types of metal materials for the fitting components, as well as metal tubing materials, including but not limited to 316, 316L, 304, 304L, any austenitic or ferritic stainless steel, any duplex stainless steel, any nickel alloy such as HASTALLOY, INCONEL, or MONEL, any precipitation hardened stainless steel such as 17-4PH for example, brass, copper alloys, any carbon or low alloy steel such as 1018 steel for example, and any leaded, re-phosphorized or re-sulphurized steel such as 12L14 steel for example. An important aspect of the choice of materials is that the tube gripping device preferably should be case or through hardened to a ratio of at least about 3.3 and preferably 4 or more times harder than the hardest tubing material that the fitting will be used with. Therefore, the tube gripping device need not be made of the same material as the tubing itself. For example, as will be discussed hereinbelow, the tube gripping device may be selected from the stainless steel materials noted above, or other suitable materials that can be case hardened, such as magnesium, titanium and aluminum, to name some additional examples. Furthermore, the frangible feature of the tube gripping ring and female threaded nut may also be realized in non-metal tube fittings.
With reference to
Note that in the drawings the fittings are illustrated in longitudinal cross-section but only half of the section is illustrated, it being understood that the other half is identical and omitted for clarity and ease of illustration. In all of the illustrations herein, various gaps and dimensions are somewhat exaggerated for ease of illustration.
The body 54 is a generally cylindrical main body 56 that has an integral extension or end 56 a. The end extension 56 a may be a hex body, for example, or part of another component such as for example a valve body as noted hereinabove. The main body 56 may be machined from the same stock as the end extension 56 a or may be otherwise attached such as by welding or other suitable technique. The body 56 includes a first central longitudinal bore 58 that is appropriately sized to closely and slideably receive a tube end 13. The first bore 58 is somewhat larger in diameter than a coaxial second bore 59 that extends through the end extension 56 a of the body 54. Of course, if the fitting 50 is a closed end connection, the inner bore 59 would not be a through bore.
The tube end 13 preferably bottoms against a counterbore 60. The body 56 is machined or otherwise formed with external male threads 62 that threadably mate with corresponding female threads 64 formed or machined in the nut 52. It is contemplated that in order to avoid inadvertent mixing of old and new style body and nut parts with prior art fitting components, that the thread pitch on the nut and body of the present invention may be substantially different from the thread pitch values of prior art ferrule-type tube fitting nuts and bodies. This will avoid interchange problems and also allows for a course pitch that provides high axial stroke with reduced nut rotation for complete pull-up. For example, a fitting that incorporates the present invention may use course pitch threads that provide sufficient axial displacement to achieve proper pull-up in a half turn. A typical prior art fitting by comparison is pulled-up with 1� to 1� turns. Nothing however prevents the designer from making the thread pitch any value suitable to a particular application, as there are other techniques to avoid interchange issues. Therefore, the one-half turn for pull-up is just one example of a variety of design choices available.
The central body bore 58 is preferably although not necessarily formed with a slight radially inward taper a relative to the longitudinal axis X (
The nut 52 includes a first central bore 70 having a first diameter D1 relative to the longitudinal axis of the fitting 50. The nut 52 also includes a second bore 72 having a second diameter D2 relative to the central longitudinal axis of the fitting 50. In this embodiment, the diameter D2 is less than the diameter D1. Furthermore, the diameter D2 is sized so that the bore 72 defines a generally cylindrical wall that receives the tube end 13 (
In accordance with a significant aspect of the invention, the nut 52 includes a tube gripping device 80 that extends axially inwardly in a somewhat cantilevered fashion from the collar 76. The tube gripping device in this example is in the general form of a gripping ring 80 and includes an inner bore 82 that defines a substantially cylindrical wall that closely receives the tube end 13 (
The tapered surface 86 joins the front end 85 preferably by a radius portion 89 and at its axial opposite end by a radius 86 a to a generally cylindrical portion 91, which in turn joins via a radius 93 to the trepan 75.
It is noted at this point that the various geometry characteristics of the tube gripping device 80 (such as, for example, the various recesses, notches, tapered portions, radius portions and so on) are selected so as to effect an appropriate radially inward hinging action as will be further explained hereinafter. Accordingly, the geometry of a tube gripping device 80 will be determined by the characteristics of the material of the tubing such as hardness and the fitting components, the dimensions of the tubing and the required tube grip and seal performance needed for a particular application. Therefore, the specific embodiments illustrated herein are intended to be exemplary in nature and not limiting as to the geometry of the tube gripping device. The above referenced patents for the two ferrule fitting also illustrate additional geometry variations to facilitate the hinging effect to obtain a desired tube grip.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the tube gripping device or ferrule 80 is attached to the female threaded nut 52 by a thin frangible web portion 95. This web portion breaks (as illustrated in
The ferrule 80 is machined with the frangible web 95 portion by forming a radial groove 154 that is angled generally toward the inside of the female threaded nut 52. This groove 154 forms the back end 150 of the ferrule 80 and also the radial wall 152 of the nut that drive the ferrule axially against the camming surface after the ferrule 80 separates from the nut 52. Preferably but not necessarily the wall 152 and the back end 150 are machined at an angle of about 75� or so relative to the tube bore axis X, although this angle may be different depending on the particular application. These surfaces 152 and 150 may be contoured to reduce galling and torque if so required.
With reference to
Upon a completed pull-up, the back end 90 of the body 54 contacts the trepan 75 which serves as a positive stop against over tightening. Should remakes be desired, the back end 90 may be axially spaced from the trepan 75 upon a completed first pull-up. Proper pull-up in this case may be verified using a gap gauge or other suitable technique, as is known.
The tube gripping ferrule 80 is shaped to effect several important functions of the fitting 50. The ferrule 80 must, upon proper pull-up, provide a fluid-tight primary seal against the tapered camming surface 88. This seal may be a primary outer seal for the tube fitting 50, or may be in effect a secondary or back-up seal to any seal formed between the tube end 13 and the body 54, for example along the bore wall 58 and/or the counterbore 60. The separated ferrule 80 also will form a primary seal at the location where the ferrule 80 bites into the outer surface of the tube end 13 in the area where the cylindrical bore 82 of the ferrule 80 engages the tube end outer surface. Again, this primary seal may in effect be a back-up or secondary seal to any seal formed by the tube end 13 against the body 54. In any event, the ferrule 80 must form primary seals against the camming surface 88 and the outer surface of the tube end 13. In addition, the ferrule 80 must adequately grip the tube end 13 so as to maintain seal integrity under pressure, temperature and vibration effects, and to prevent the tube end from separating from the fitting under such circumstances.
In order to achieve a fluid-tight seal and tube gripping action, the ferrule 80 is designed to be plastically deformed and swaged into the tube end upon completed pull-up, as illustrated in
Although the present invention is described herein in the various embodiments as effecting an embedded nose portion and attendant swaging action, those skilled in the art will appreciate that in some applications such rigorous design criteria may not always be required, particularly for fittings that will be exposed to moderate temperature, vibration and pressure effects. Therefore, the additional design aspects of the nut, body and gripping ring set forth herein as preferred embodiments should therefore not be construed in a limiting sense but rather as selectable enhancements of the basic concepts of the invention to be used as required for particular applications.
In order to achieve the desired swaging action and tube grip, the ferrule 80 is designed to exhibit the hinging action that allows the tapered nose portion 84 and the central or mid-portion (as at the region of the cylindrical bore 82 or the region designated 94) of the gripping ring 80 to be radially inwardly compressed as it engages with the tapered camming mouth 88 of the body 56. This hinging action is also used to provide a significant radial displacement and compression of the cylindrical wall 82 to swage a central or mid-portion of the ferrule 80 body onto the tube end 13 axially adjacent to the stress riser 94. In the embodiment of
Proper deformation of the ferrule 80 may further be controlled by selecting an appropriate contour for the tapered surface 88. This surface engages the tapered nose of the ferrule 80 and therefore will in part determine the timing and manner of how the ferrule 80 hinges, compresses and plastically deforms to properly embed the nose portion to bite into the tubing and also provide the desired collet or swaging action. Furthermore, the contour of the camming surface 88 may be designed to achieve the desired seal between the ferrule 80 nose portion and the tapered surface 88. This seal is important to the overall performance of the fitting, as is the seal provided between the ferrule 80 and the tube end 13.
The nut 52 with its integral tube gripping ferrule 80 may be manufactured by standard machining operations, and will typically include a trepan operation to form the outer contour of the ring 80. The other features of the nut 52 can be realized as well with known machining operations. Preferably but not necessarily the nut 52 includes wrench flats 102 to permit the user to tighten the nut 52 onto the body 54. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that use of the fitting 50 only requires relative rotation between the nut 52 and the body 54, such that either component or both may be rotated as required during a pull-up operation.
We have found that it is highly desirable for the camming surface 88 to form a camming angle .theta. of about 35�-60� relative to the longitudinal axis X of the fitting 50 and tube end 13. More preferably the angle .theta. of the camming surface 88 should be 40�-50�, and most preferred the angle .theta. should be about 45�. This range of angles for the camming surface 88 differs dramatically from commonly used metal ferrule-type tube fitting designs. Commonly used tube fittings have camming surface angles in the range of 10�-25�, which is a substantially shallower angle compared to the present invention. The shallower camming angle is necessary in prior art fittings to have the ferrule slide a greater axial distance along the camming surface. This greater sliding action permits the tube gripping device to be more gradually radially deformed into the tube end to form a gripping action or bite on the tube. This is especially the case for stainless steel tubing. Prior tube fittings that included what might appear to be a steeper camming angle actually either rely on a shallow portion of the camming surface or do not produce a bite in the tubing, thereby limiting the pressure resistance of the fitting. The shallow camming angle of the prior art, however, compromises the ability of a single ferrule to form a dependable seal. In sharp contrast, the present invention utilizes a substantially steeper camming surface angle .theta., which permits the gripping ring nose portion 84 in effect to be coined into the camming surface 88 without substantial sliding action, thereby forming an excellent seal.
In the exemplary embodiments herein, the nose portion 84 includes the radius portion 89 that transitions to the outer tapered surface 86. This outer surface 86 tapers generally at an angle that is not as steep as the angle of the camming surface 88. The tapered outer surface 86 preferably tapers axially with an increasing radial dimension towards the back end of the gripping ring 80. This tapered outer portion 86 contacts the camming surface 88 with, in effect, a generally narrow zone or line contact upon pull-up that has high stress and material coining to allow the front end of the gripping ring 80 to coin into the camming surface 88. Therefore, the term "generally narrow line contact" is not intended to preclude an area of contact between the outer tapered surface 86 and the camming surface 88, but rather more generally to the concept of a localized contact zone near or at the innermost extent of the camming surface 88 of high stress and material coining between the outer tapered surface 86 and the camming surface 88. By "coin" is simply meant that the gripping ring 80 achieves a good metal to metal seal between the radius portion 89 and the camming surface 88 by forming a generally narrow circumferential line contact of metal burnished on metal to effect a gas tight primary seal between the tapered surface 86 and the camming surface 88.
It is important to note that the use of a particular camming angle is not dependent necessarily on the contour of the surface 88. In other words, the angle of interest is the angle at which the front end of the gripping ring 80 contacts the camming surface 88 to form a seal thereat. Thus, the camming surface 88 may indeed be made with a non-frusto-conical contour, but the seal is still formed by the front end of the ferrule 80 contacting a steep angled surface 88. Additional compound angles or contours of the camming surface 88 may be used to better facilitate the hinging action and tube bite achieved by the ferrule 80.
Whether the camming surface 88 is formed as a compound angled surface with additional angled portions that are steeper or shallower to facilitate the hinging action and bite of the gripping ring 80 into the tube end 13, in accordance with this aspect of the invention, the sealing portion of the front end of the gripping ring 80 (in the exemplary embodiments the radius portion 89) forms the primary seal on a steep angled portion of the camming surface 88, preferably a steep angled portion in the range of angle .theta. of about 35�-60� relative to the longitudinal axis X of the fitting 50 and tube end 13, more preferably the angle .theta. of the camming surface 88 should be 40�-50�, and most preferred the angle .theta. should be about 45 at the location where the primary seal is to be formed. Preferably although not necessarily this primary seal is effected by a generally narrow line contact type engagement between the front end of the gripping ring 80 and the camming surface 88.
The steeper camming surface angle has the additional benefit that the nose or front portion of the tube gripping device 80 may be formed with substantially more mass as compared to if the front portion had to engage a shallower camming surface angle as in the prior art single ferrule and gripping ring designs. This added mass, along with the hinging action, tends to position a substantially greater mass of material at or near the location of the tube bite 94. This significantly strengthens the tube gripping device in resisting pressure and also strengthens the collet effect that isolates the bite from vibration and temperature effects, as contrasted to prior art single ferrule or gripping ring designs. The hinging action also results in the back end of the tube gripping device (i.e. the end opposite the nose end 84) from contacting the tube end, so that the entire tube gripping device is in axial and radial compression.
In general, for a tube gripping device such as a ferrule to embed into, bite and grip the tube end, the tube gripping device must be harder than the tube end. This is especially so for thick wall tubing. The greater axial movement of a ferrule in a shallow angle camming mouth of the prior art allows a ferrule to embed into a tube even when the ferrule is only moderately harder than the tube. Under these circumstances if the tube gripping device 80 were only moderately harder than the tube end, the device would be unable to adequately grip the tube for a steep angle camming surface because of the substantially shorter axial movement of the tube gripping device during pull-up caused by the steeper camming angle. However, in accordance with the present invention, by making the tube gripping device significantly harder than the tubing, a steeper angle camming surface may be used and is effective to cause the tube gripping device to adequately bite into the tube end to grip the tube.
The steeper camming angle .theta. of the present invention also results in a much shorter distance of axial displacement of the ferrule 80 during pull-up. Consequently, the nose portion 84 will need to be radially deformed and compressed into the tube end 13 with a much shorter axial displacement or sliding movement. In order to achieve the proper tube grip then, the ferrule 80 is preferably case hardened to a hardness of at least about 3.3 times harder than the tubing material. For example, if the tubing material is stainless steel, it may exhibit a hardness of up to about 200 Vickers. Therefore, in accordance with this aspect of the invention, when the fitting 50 is used with such hard materials, the tube gripping device should be hardened to a ratio of at least about 3.3 times harder than the tubing. More preferred, the tube gripping device should be hardened to a ratio of at least 4 times harder than the tubing. Still further, the entire gripping ring 80 need not be case hardened, but rather only the nose portion 84 may be selectively case hardened.
In accordance with this aspect of the invention, all or part of the nut 52 and body 54 may be through hardened or case hardened to increase the tube grip of the fitting 50 when used with harder tubing materials such as stainless steel. Suitable case hardening processes are fully described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,165,597 and 6,093,303 and copending patent application Ser. No. 09/494,093 filed on Jan. 28, 2000 for MODIFIED LOW TEMPERATURE CASE HARDENING PROCESS, issued to the assignee of the present invention, the entire disclosures of which are fully incorporated herein by reference. These processes produce a hardness of the tube gripping device of about 800 to 1000 Vickers or higher without compromising the corrosion resistance of the fitting. Other case hardening techniques however may be used as required. Case hardening of the tube gripping ring 80 allows the ring 80 to adequately grip and seal against tubing materials such as stainless steel including duplex stainless steel. The above referenced case hardening patents have an additional benefit of providing surfaces on the ring 80 that reduce or prevent galling between the ring 80 (which rotates with the nut 52) and the tubing.
Various lubricants may also be used with the tube gripping ring 80 to reduce galling and residual torsion such as, for example, PTFE greases, and greases containing molybdenum disulphide or tungsten disulphide.
Case hardening techniques typically will result in the entire nut 52 and integral tube gripping ring 80 to be case hardened. When the case hardening is performed on stainless steel, for example, as in the above referenced patents or patent application, an adherent oxide skin is formed. In another embodiment of the invention, a solid lubricant may be applied to the threads of the stainless steel nuts 52 to reduce friction and the hence pull-up torque during tightening. Any solid lubricant can be used for this purpose and many such solid lubricants are well known. A few examples are graphite, molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide and UHMWPE (ultra high molecular weight polyethylene). These lubricants can be used neat, i.e. not combined with another material, or mixed with another material such as a resinous carrier or the like. In addition, they can be used in essentially any solid form including powders, granules and pastes.
Solid lubricants of this type are well known commercial products. Examples include Dow Corning� 321 Dry Film Lubricant available from Dow Corning Corporation of Midland, Mich. and Slickote� Dry Lube 100 available from Trans Chem Coatings, of Monrovia, Calif.
These lubricants can be applied by any standard method such as by hand, by aerosol or air spraying or by automatic equipment. Any coating thickness can be used which will provide lubricating properties. Solid lubricant thickness exceeding standard class 2 thread clearances are usually not required. If appropriate, the lubricant can also be heated to enhance its adhesion. For example, some lubricants, especially those supplied in a resinous binder, can be heated to effect cure of the binder. For example, Slickote� Dry Lube 100 can be heated following manufacturer's instructions to 300� F. for 1 hour, for example.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, a dry lubricant as described above is used on stainless steel nuts 52 which have been subjected to low temperature carburization using carbon monoxide as the carbon source. Stainless steel is stainless because of the thin, coherent chromium oxide film which inherently forms when the steel is exposed to air. Low temperature carburization of stainless steel parts, such as those made from AISI 316 and 316L stainless steel, usually leaves the part surfaces coated with a layer of soot. Before use this soot is usually removed by washing. When carbon monoxide is used as the carbon source in low temperature carburization, not only does soot form but in addition a heavy oxide film also forms. This heavy oxide film is considerably different from the coherent chromium oxide film which makes stainless steel stainless in that it is thicker and not coherent. Therefore, this film is also removed before use to uncover the part's carburized surface.
In accordance with this particular embodiment, this heavy oxide film is not removed before application of the solid lubricant. Rather, it is left on the carburized part surfaces, or at least the portions of the carburized surfaces to be lubricated. In accordance this particular embodiment, it has been found that the naturally porous structure of this heavy oxide skin acts as an anchor for binding the lubricant to the part surfaces. As a result, the lubricant is more adherent than would otherwise be the case, and hence is able to withstand repeated fitting remakes (i.e., loosening and re-tightening of the nut) without being removed.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment. Clearly, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding of this specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Mar 26, 1904
|Oct 4, 1904
|Leon Sussman
|Jul 7, 1904
|Jun 6, 1905
|Alfred Higginbotham
|Oct 1, 1912
|Apr 8, 1913
|Jun 14, 1911
|Jun 22, 1915
|Frederick H Tweed
|Oct 22, 1918
|Mar 16, 1920
|Blanchard Henry A
|Sep 26, 1923
|Aug 10, 1926
|Adolph Mueller
|Compression coupling
|Aug 5, 1927
|Apr 22, 1930
|Dohner Burt E
|Method of making couplings
|Nov 5, 1928
|Dec 6, 1932
|Dobrick August C
|Compression coupling
|Aug 4, 1930
|Sep 19, 1933
|Imp Brass Mfg Co
|Compression coupling
|Jun 16, 1933
|Dec 11, 1934
|Dohner Burt E
|Compression coupling
|Jan 25, 1937
|Jun 8, 1937
|Laurence L Rector
|Joint seal
|Aug 22, 1936
|Aug 23, 1938
|Mueller Ervin H
|Oct 25, 1933
|Dec 6, 1938
|Patex Sa
|Joint for pipes
|Dec 13, 1934
|Mar 7, 1939
|Dole Valve Co
|Pipe coupling
|Nov 29, 1937
|Mar 28, 1939
|Flex O Tube Company
|Detachable fitting
|Jan 27, 1937
|Jul 11, 1939
|Ford Meter Box Company
|Meter setter
|Jun 5, 1937
|Nov 7, 1939
|Dole Valve Co
|Pipe coupling
|Jun 27, 1941
|May 26, 1942
|Otto E Ellick
|High pressure union
|Oct 23, 1942
|Nov 2, 1943
|Irving Cowles
|Coupling for metal tubing
|Sep 5, 1942
|Jun 12, 1945
|Laue Charles Ernest
|Compression fitting
|Feb 26, 1943
|Aug 13, 1946
|Imp Brass Mfg Co
|Sealed flexible coupling
|Jul 3, 1944
|Aug 27, 1946
|Automotive Prod Co Ltd
|Coupling device for pipes or tubes
|Nov 15, 1946
|Sep 28, 1948
|Robert L Kahn
|Dec 22, 1944
|Oct 26, 1948
|Woodling George V
|Tube fitting device
|Jul 10, 1945
|Feb 1, 1949
|Weatherhead Co
|Tube coupling
|Jun 27, 1946
|Feb 1, 1949
|Weatherhead Co
|Aug 9, 1945
|Jun 21, 1949
|Wurzburger Paul D
|Pipe coupling
|Oct 2, 1946
|Feb 14, 1950
|Brockway Company
|Pipe connector
|Nov 23, 1945
|May 23, 1950
|Jacques Mercier
|Compression coupling
|May 27, 1946
|Jun 13, 1950
|Anchor Coupling Company Inc
|Sleeve type tube coupling
|Mar 1, 1949
|Feb 13, 1951
|Woodling George V
|Threaded contractible ring sleeve
|Sep 18, 1946
|Mar 6, 1951
|Brockway Company
|Pipe connecting
|May 22, 1948
|Mar 6, 1951
|Brockway Company
|Pipe connection
|Mar 6, 1947
|May 22, 1951
|Brockway Company
|Self-upsetting coupling
|Feb 19, 1948
|Jul 24, 1951
|Falkirk Iron Company Ltd
|Pipe joint
|Mar 1, 1949
|Dec 25, 1951
|Woodling George V
|Flareless tube connection
|Feb 7, 1950
|Oct 28, 1952
|Joseph A Rini
|Pipe fitting
|Sep 15, 1949
|Jun 9, 1953
|Scovill Manufacturing Co
|Coupling construction
|May 5, 1950
|Nov 2, 1954
|Wurzburger Paul D
|Pipe coupling with deformable ring for flareless pipe
|Jun 21, 1951
|Mar 20, 1956
|Hans Kreidel
|Cam actuated gland type pipe coupling
|Feb 12, 1954
|Jul 17, 1956
|Arthur W Jacobs
|Synthetic resin gland type coupling for tubes
|Jan 14, 1952
|Sep 4, 1956
|Watts Electric & Mfg Co
|Tube coupling adapted to upset pipe end
|Mar 14, 1949
|Oct 30, 1956
|Bowser Inc
|High pressure replaceable hose coupling with wire spring gripper
|Jan 23, 1953
|Feb 18, 1958
|Wurzburger Paul D
|Pipe coupling with deformable ring for flareless pipe
|Mar 31, 1958
|May 3, 1960
|Mckiernan Terry Corp
|Readily applicable, shock proof end fitting for heavy duty flexible tubing
|Mar 19, 1958
|Oct 31, 1961
|Jacobs Arthur W
|Lawn sprinkler nozzle
|Sep 22, 1958
|Nov 7, 1961
|Battelle Memorial Institute
|Flareless tube coupling and ferrule therefor
|Feb 10, 1956
|Mar 13, 1962
|Imp Eastman Corp
|Fitting for seamed tubing
|Jun 29, 1961
|Sep 10, 1963
|Crawford Fitting Co
|Controlled phase sequential gripping device
|Feb 8, 1960
|Sep 24, 1963
|Walker Manufacturing Company
|Plastic fitting with metallic tubing
|May 12, 1959
|Feb 11, 1964
|Parker Hannifin Corp
|Flareless tube coupling
|Oct 16, 1959
|Jun 30, 1964
|Imp Eastman Corp
|Tube fitting having means to indicate complete assembly positions
|Nov 13, 1959
|Jan 26, 1965
|Richard L Cannaday
|Sealed pipe joint
|Oct 27, 1960
|Jul 20, 1965
|Jacobs Arthur W
|Gland type coupling for tubes
|Apr 17, 1962
|Nov 2, 1965
|Hoke Mfg Company Inc
|Pipe coupling
|Jul 21, 1964
|Apr 26, 1966
|Chicago Fitting Corp
|Fitting assembly for metal tubes
|Jun 25, 1964
|Sep 27, 1966
|Imp Eastman Corp
|Mar 18, 1964
|Dec 6, 1966
|Z & W Mfg Corp
|Compression fitting
|Jan 20, 1966
|Dec 6, 1966
|Howe Plastics And Chemical Co
|Portable infant's seat
|Apr 19, 1965
|Dec 27, 1966
|L & L Mfg Company
|Self-flaring tube coupling
|Feb 12, 1965
|May 16, 1967
|Glanzstoff Ag
|Lead roller for elastomeric threads
|Nov 19, 1964
|Jun 13, 1967
|Parker Hannifin Corp
|Flareless tube coupling nut and ferrule assembly
|Nov 17, 1964
|Jun 20, 1967
|Parker Hannifin Corp
|Tube coupling
|May 25, 1967
|Jan 23, 1968
|Eclipse Fuel Eng Co
|Pressure fitting for a tube joint
|Dec 23, 1965
|Apr 23, 1968
|Imperical Eastman Corp
|Tube connector
|Sep 27, 1967
|Apr 15, 1969
|L & L Mfg Co
|Fluid pressure coupling
|Nov 6, 1967
|Apr 29, 1969
|Parker Hannifin Corp
|Tube coupling
|Apr 10, 1967
|May 20, 1969
|Hoke Inc
|Tube coupling having dual ferrule gripping elements with stop means
|Nov 16, 1967
|Jul 8, 1969
|Carpano & Pons
|Adapter for flexible tubing
|Jan 30, 1969
|May 19, 1970
|Inventex Ltd
|Sealing ring with different shaped cutting edges for pipe connections
|Aug 26, 1968
|Jul 28, 1970
|Amp Inc
|Tube coupling having deformable gripping means
|Apr 14, 1969
|Feb 23, 1971
|American Standard Inc
|Spout connector apparatus
|May 28, 1969
|May 25, 1971
|Fouquet Werk Frauz & Planck
|Pipe union
|Jul 14, 1969
|Nov 9, 1971
|Primore Sales Inc
|Tube coupling
|Sep 11, 1970
|Aug 15, 1972
|Imp Eastman Corp
|Vibration resistant coupling
|Apr 15, 1971
|Sep 19, 1972
|Crawford Fitting Co
|Ferrule setting apparatus
|Jul 16, 1970
|Oct 3, 1972
|Hoke Inc
|Pipe coupling
|Mar 9, 1971
|Jan 2, 1973
|Takagi T
|Pipe joint
|Feb 16, 1971
|May 29, 1973
|Crawford C B
|Tube coupling
|Mar 15, 1972
|Jul 3, 1973
|Imp Eastman Corp
|One-piece sleeve and nut coupling means
|Mar 16, 1971
|Jul 17, 1973
|H Gold
|Fluid tight conduit fastening system
|Dec 21, 1970
|Nov 20, 1973
|Crawford Fitting Co
|Apparatus for use in the make-up of tube fittings
|Apr 3, 1972
|Nov 19, 1974
|Chicago Fittings Corp
|High pressure fitting
|Dec 8, 1972
|Dec 31, 1974
|Voss Armaturen
|Pipe coupling
|Jul 13, 1973
|Feb 18, 1975
|Gold Harold
|Fluid tight conduit fastening system
|Jul 11, 1973
|Jun 10, 1975
|Parker Hannifin Corp
|Tube coupling and ferrule therefor
|Apr 1, 1974
|Jul 8, 1975
|Weatherhead Co
|Flareless fitting
|May 13, 1974
|Jul 22, 1975
|Mueller Co
|Collet compression connection
|Jan 2, 1974
|Dec 2, 1975
|Imp Eastman Corp
|Tube fitting
|Feb 18, 1975
|Jul 20, 1976
|Alco Standard Corporation
|Conduit coupling structure
|Sep 11, 1975
|Aug 31, 1976
|Fluoroware, Inc.
|Plastic tube fitting and joint
|Feb 2, 1973
|Oct 12, 1976
|Olov Magnus Normark
|Friction joint between mechanical elements
|Jan 16, 1975
|Nov 16, 1976
|E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company
|Tube fitting
|Jan 9, 1976
|May 10, 1977
|Imperial-Eastman Corporation
|One-piece nut and sleeve for improved tube fitting
|Nov 13, 1975
|May 31, 1977
|Lacrex Brevetti S.A.
|Releasable coupling
|Mar 1, 1976
|Jul 5, 1977
|Ideal Industries, Inc.
|Conduit fitting
|Sep 13, 1976
|Jul 26, 1977
|Emco Ltd.
|Pipe coupling
|May 25, 1976
|Feb 7, 1978
|Hepworth Plastics Limited
|Pipe couplings
|Feb 8, 1973
|Feb 28, 1978
|Crawford Fitting Co.
|Tube fitting
|Oct 13, 1976
|Jan 9, 1979
|Cordis Dow Corp.
|Connector for attachment of blood tubing to external arteriovenous shunts and fistulas
|Jul 25, 1977
|Jan 9, 1979
|Shutt George V
|Fitting employing flexible plastic tubing with rolled back end
|Nov 18, 1977
|Jan 30, 1979
|Aeroquip Corporation
|Flareless tube fitting for 37� adapter
|Aug 29, 1977
|Jan 30, 1979
|Parker-Hannifin Corporation
|Coupling device for tubular members
|Dec 22, 1977
|Oct 2, 1979
|General Signal Corporation
|Fitting for liquid tight flexible metal conduit
|Jul 24, 1978
|Mar 11, 1980
|Pacella Samuel S
|Flexible conduit connector
|Aug 15, 1979
|Mar 17, 1981
|Boisset Michel L
|Union for tubes having a smooth end
|Dec 5, 1979
|Apr 7, 1981
|Emerson Electric Co.
|Compression fitting
|Sep 27, 1979
|Oct 6, 1981
|Industrias Neoplast, S.A.
|Rapid coupling for plastic pipes
|Feb 19, 1980
|Dec 8, 1981
|Gould Inc.
|Tube coupling with frangible sleeve
|Jul 1, 1980
|Jan 5, 1982
|Societe Anonyme Dite: Legris
|Pipe fittings, and in particular for high pressure fluid pipes
|May 16, 1980
|Aug 10, 1982
|Galtek Corporation
|Plastic control valve
|Jun 19, 1981
|Jul 10, 1984
|The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy
|Ferrules seals
|Aug 2, 1982
|Nov 20, 1984
|Deere & Company
|Pipe coupling
|Nov 24, 1982
|Feb 19, 1985
|Shell Oil Company
|Pipeline connector
|Sep 30, 1982
|Apr 2, 1985
|Plasson Maagan Michael Industries Ltd.
|Tube connection fittings
|Nov 8, 1983
|Jun 11, 1985
|Small Leroy O
|Variable position light stand
|Nov 28, 1984
|Jul 16, 1985
|Aeroquip Corporation
|Flat-face tube connector
|Apr 8, 1982
|Sep 3, 1985
|Fresenius Ag
|Union for medical instruments or pipes and a female half of such a union
|Sep 8, 1983
|Sep 3, 1985
|Imperial Clevite Inc.
|High pressure, leakproof, blowout-proof tube fitting
|Nov 21, 1983
|Sep 17, 1985
|City Of Hope National Medical Center
|Fluid tight seal for container
|Nov 25, 1983
|Dec 3, 1985
|Imperial Clevite Inc.
|Vibration resistant high pressure tube fitting
|Mar 9, 1984
|Feb 4, 1986
|Jean Walterscheid Gmbh
|Threaded pipe connector
|Sep 20, 1984
|May 6, 1986
|Ermeto Armaturen Gmbh
|Tube fitting with ferrule
|Mar 30, 1983
|Dec 23, 1986
|Fujikin International, Inc.
|Pipe couplings
|Oct 17, 1985
|Mar 3, 1987
|Brass-Craft Manufacturing Company
|Tube coupling
|Feb 18, 1986
|Apr 7, 1987
|Tube-Alloy Corporation
|Seals for use in oil and gas well production tubing
|Jun 25, 1986
|Jul 28, 1987
|Friedrichsfeld Gmbh Keramik-Und Kunststoffwerke
|Connecting arrangement with a threaded sleeve
|Sep 9, 1986
|Apr 26, 1988
|Sueddeutsche Kuehlerfabrik Julius Fr. Behr Gmbh. & Co. Kg
|Heat exchanger
|Nov 23, 1987
|Dec 6, 1988
|Amp Incorporated
|Assembly for an electrical cable providing strain relief and a water-tight seal
|Dec 10, 1987
|May 2, 1989
|Crawford Fitting Co.
|Coupling device for heavy-walled tubular members
|Sep 28, 1987
|Aug 29, 1989
|Mita Industrial Co., Ltd.
|Support and adjusting apparatus for an optical unit
|Dec 11, 1987
|Jan 2, 1990
|Simplex Wire & Cable
|Integral ferrule
|May 3, 1989
|Feb 27, 1990
|Uniflex Utiltime S.P.A.
|Coupling device with retained actuating members
|Oct 18, 1988
|Apr 10, 1990
|Crawford Fitting Co.
|Coupling device for heavy-walled tubular members
|Oct 11, 1988
|Jul 10, 1990
|Dormont Manufacturing Company
|Fitting for tubing
|Oct 3, 1988
|Jul 31, 1990
|Mcneil (Ohio) Corporation
|Frangible male coupling component
|Aug 9, 1989
|Mar 12, 1991
|Proni Creations Inc.
|Force concentrating unitary fitting
|Aug 29, 1990
|Dec 24, 1991
|Vecere William T
|Fitting and tube apparatus for gas emission sample container
|Oct 30, 1990
|Dec 24, 1991
|Crawford Fitting Co.
|Tube fitting
|Aug 27, 1991
|May 19, 1992
|Parker Hannifin Corporation
|Electrically insulated tube union
|Jan 22, 1991
|Jul 28, 1992
|Connector for fiber optics
|Jul 26, 1991
|Nov 17, 1992
|Ruska Laboratories, Inc.
|Connection apparatus with ferrule forming structure
|Aug 6, 1991
|Mar 16, 1993
|Cooper Industries, Inc.
|Tubing hanger seal assembly
|Apr 23, 1990
|Jun 8, 1993
|Aeroquip Corporation
|Flareless compression fitting
|May 8, 1992
|Aug 31, 1993
|Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft
|Plug-type connection for a tubular body
|Jul 28, 1992
|Aug 9, 1994
|Romac Industries Inc.
|Cooperating combination of a gland and a grip ring installed in restrained sealed bolted joints of fluid piping systems including both plastic pipe and metallic pipe
|Nov 27, 1991
|Oct 4, 1994
|Parker Ermeto Gmbh
|Coupling device
|Aug 10, 1993
|Aug 8, 1995
|Jun Taga
|Coupling and method for folding back a pipe and using for it and its apparatus
|Aug 25, 1993
|Feb 6, 1996
|Itt Corporation
|Mounting apparatus with reduced resistance bead seal
|Mar 23, 1995
|May 14, 1996
|Nwd International, Inc.
|Hydraulic port fittings
|Apr 20, 1995
|Mar 4, 1997
|Universal Enterprises, Inc.
|Member and tube assembly
|Jul 5, 1995
|Aug 19, 1997
|Universal Enterprises, Inc.
|Flare-tube assembly
|Jun 7, 1995
|Jan 27, 1998
|Itt Automotive, Inc.
|High pressure quick connect for use in automotive brake system application
|Sep 7, 1995
|Feb 10, 1998
|The Perkin-Elmer Corporation
|Fluid conveying device with removable connection
|Aug 19, 1994
|Feb 17, 1998
|Itt Corporation
|High pressure quick connector
|Dec 19, 1996
|Mar 10, 1998
|Dials; Carroll P.
|Conduit coupling
|Feb 16, 1996
|Oct 20, 1998
|Moore; Boyd B.
|Ferrule--type fitting for sealing an electrical conduit in a well head barrier
|Apr 15, 1997
|Mar 16, 1999
|Williams; Peter C.
|Ferrule with relief to reduce galling
|Jul 29, 1997
|Sep 21, 1999
|Edstrom Industries, Inc.
|Sanitary fitting having ferrule with grooved undercut
|Jul 31, 1996
|Oct 5, 1999
|Froehlich; Manfred
|High-pressure connection system
|Sep 23, 1996
|Dec 28, 1999
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Pipe coupling apparatus for use in air conditioners
|Mar 26, 1998
|Feb 8, 2000
|Flowell Corporation
|Joint for coupling tubes
|Jan 21, 1998
|Mar 21, 2000
|Mwm Distributors
|Plumbing compression fitting for connecting ends of pipe
|Jan 21, 1999
|Apr 4, 2000
|Nippon Pillar Packing Co., Ltd.
|Pipe joint made of resin
|Mar 6, 1998
|Jun 13, 2000
|Armaturenfabrik Hermann Voss Gmbh & Co.
|Screwed pipe joint with cutting ring for metal tubes
|Jun 27, 1997
|Jul 18, 2000
|Fico Transpar, S.A.
|Rapid connection and disconnection device for electropumps and conduits for motor vehicle wind-shield washing systems
|Aug 12, 1998
|Jul 25, 2000
|Swagelok Company
|Low temperature case hardening processes
|Oct 29, 1998
|Aug 15, 2000
|Agilent Technologies, In.
|Connector for capillary tubing
|Jul 8, 1998
|Aug 29, 2000
|Usui Kokusai Sangyo Kaisha Limited
|Connecting structure of externally resin-coated small-diameter metallic pipe
|Dec 15, 1999
|Sep 26, 2000
|Higashio Mech Co., Ltd.
|Pipe joint
|Apr 2, 1998
|Oct 17, 2000
|Swagelok Company
|Ferrule with relief to reduce galling
|Aug 12, 1998
|Dec 26, 2000
|Swagelok Company
|Selective case hardening processes at low temperature
|Sep 29, 1998
|Jan 2, 2001
|Walterscheid Rohrverbindungstechnik Gmbh
|Threaded connection with supporting ring
|Feb 4, 1998
|Jan 16, 2001
|Titeflex Corporation
|Self-flaring, split bushing pipe fitting and hose assemblies employing same
|Mar 19, 1999
|Jan 30, 2001
|Kimio Okamoto
|Tube-connecting fitting and fitting structure
|Sep 13, 1999
|Aug 28, 2001
|Swagelok Company
|Intrinsic gauging for tube fittings
|Aug 21, 1998
|Feb 12, 2002
|Swagelok Company
|Phase controlled sequential gripping tube fitting
|Nov 24, 1999
|Mar 26, 2002
|Hewing Gmbh
|Screw joint for pipes
|Aug 1, 2000
|May 21, 2002
|Futaba Industrial Co. Ltd.
|Fuel inlet and manufacturing method thereof
|Aug 16, 2000
|Aug 27, 2002
|Michael Douglas Seymour
|Method of forming a connection between a tube and a fitting
|May 15, 2000
|Oct 8, 2002
|Swagelok Company
|Low temperature case hardening processes
|Dec 23, 1997
|Dec 3, 2002
|Jae Young Shim
|Piping joint and integrated valve with it
|Jan 28, 2000
|Apr 15, 2003
|Swagelok Company
|Modified low temperature case hardening processes
|Dec 22, 1999
|Oct 7, 2003
|Swagelok Company
|Ferrule with relief to reduce galling
|Mar 12, 2002
|Nov 4, 2003
|Swagelok Company
|Intrinsic gauging for tube fittings
|Aug 19, 2002
|Nov 4, 2003
|Parker-Hannifin Corporation
|Screw connection
|Sep 30, 2002
|Feb 8, 2005
|Parker-Hannifin Corporation
|Tube fitting for medium pressure applications
|Aug 15, 2003
|Jun 27, 2006
|Swagelok Company
|Fitting with separable gripping device for pipe and tube
|Feb 6, 2002
|Sep 19, 2006
|Swagelok Company
|Tube fitting with separable tube gripping ring
|Sep 13, 2004
|Mar 27, 2007
|Swagelok Company
|Intrinsic gauging for tube fittings
|Mar 12, 2002
|Oct 17, 2002
|Williams Peter C.
|Intrinsic gauging for tube fittings
|Sep 30, 2002
|Jun 12, 2003
|Gibson James David
|Tube fitting for medium pressure applications
|Feb 5, 2003
|Aug 21, 2003
|Williams Peter C.
|Lubricated low temperature carburized stainless steel parts
|Aug 15, 2003
|Oct 28, 2004
|Williams Peter C.
|Fitting for metal pipe and tubing
|Apr 22, 2005
|Nov 3, 2005
|Williams Peter C
|Fitting for tube and pipe
|Feb 6, 2002
|Mar 9, 2006
|Williams Peter C
|Tube fitting for stainless steel tubing
|Oct 20, 2005
|Jun 29, 2006
|Williams Peter C
|Fitting for tube and pipe with cartridge
|Jan 6, 2006
|Jul 13, 2006
|Williams Peter C
|Carburization of ferrous-based shape memory alloys
|Mar 14, 2006
|Oct 26, 2006
|Anderson Bret M
|Tool for preparing fitting and conduit connection
|Aug 30, 2007
|Mar 6, 2008
|Swagelok Company
|Fitting for fluid conduits
|Title not available
|Dec 22, 1990
|May 22, 2003
|Voss Automotive Gmbh
|Feb 18, 2002
|Jun 28, 2007
|Peter Pisinger
|Jan 10, 2000
|Jul 19, 2000
|F. X. Bachmann AG
|Method and device for fastening a pipe to a member
|Jan 28, 2000
|Jul 17, 2002
|Glynwed Pipe Systems Limited
|Pipe coupling
|May 26, 2000
|Jul 28, 2004
|Tokai Rubber Industries, Ltd.
|Tube clamping structure
|May 27, 2000
|Aug 8, 2001
|VAW Aluminium AG
|Cast cylinder head and block
|Jul 12, 2004
|Dec 26, 2012
|Daikin Industries, Ltd.
|Pipe joint
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed Mar. 22, 2005.
|Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/112,800 dated Aug. 1, 2008.
|Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/112,800 dated Jan. 7, 2008.
|Examination Report issued Aug. 22, 2005 from corresponding European Patent Application Serial No. 02703345.5, 2 pgs.
|Examination Report issued Aug. 4, 2006 from corresponding European Patent Application Serial No. 02703345.5, 4 pgs.
|International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US05/013758, mailed Aug. 12, 2005.
|International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US06/024776, mailed Jan. 19, 2007.
|International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US06/041214, mailed Apr. 12, 2007, 12 pgs.
|International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US08/72072 dated Jan. 28, 2009.
|International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2004/026096, mailed Dec. 29, 2004.
|International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2007/019025, mailed Apr. 29, 2008.
|International Search Report from PCT/US02/03430, mailed Nov. 06, 2002.
|International Search Report from PCT/US02/3430, mailed Nov. 6, 2002.
|International Search Report from PCT/US07/83416 dated Apr. 21, 2008.
|Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed Apr. 25, 2006.
|Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 11/112,800 dated Jul. 29, 2008.
|Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/467,444, mailed May 5, 2006.
|Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed Jan. 26, 2006.
|Office action from Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 200580019992.1, dated Jan. 4, 2008.
|Office action from Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 30722/05, mailed Mar. 24, 2008, received on Mar. 31, 2008.
|Office action from Japanese Serial No. 2002-562904, dispatched Aug. 7, 2007, received on Nov. 9, 2007.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/467,444, mailed May 11, 2005.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/467,444, mailed Nov. 29, 2005.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/467,444, mailed Oct. 27, 2004.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed Dec. 28, 2004.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed Jun. 3, 2004.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed May 11, 2005.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/112,800 dated Apr. 2, 2009.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/522,814, mailed Dec. 28, 2007.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/522,814, mailed Jun. 6, 2007.
|Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,104 dated Jan. 15, 2009.
|One page drawing, Drawing No. Standard 800 Series Space Collar ASSY, (illustrated collar and fitting assembly offered for sale at least as early as Feb. 5, 2000), Swagelok Company.
|Parker Hannifin Corporation, Engineering Report-Ferrule Design Suparcase, Parker Suparcase Bulletin, 4230-B15.1, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
|Parker Hannifin Corporation, Engineering Report—Ferrule Design Suparcase, Parker Suparcase Bulletin, 4230-B15.1, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
|Parker Hannifin Corporation, Parker Suparcase Process Hardens Stainless Steel to Become More Resistant to Corrosion, News Release, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
|Parker Hannifin Corporation, Parker Suparcase, A Proprietary Process for the Hardening of Stainless Steel Ferrules, Parker Suparcase Bulletin, Mar. 1993, 4230-B15.3, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
|Parker Hannifin Corporation, Suparcase, The Invisible Breakthrough, Parker Suparcase Promotion Folder, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
|Supplemental Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,094, mailed Feb. 28, 2006.
|Two pages, 4300 Catalog, Triple-Lok 37 degrees Flared Tube Fittings, Parker Hannifin, Sep. 2000.
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Mar 5, 2010
|May 14, 2013
|Swagelok Company
|Conduit fitting with pull-up indication
|Dec 6, 2011
|Jul 16, 2013
|Honeywell International, Inc.
|Hand held bar code readers or mobile computers with cloud computing services
|Mar 5, 2012
|Nov 5, 2013
|Mecanique Analytique Inc.
|Fitting component, ferrule and nut
|Apr 20, 2012
|May 20, 2014
|Honeywell International Inc.
|System and method for calibration and mapping of real-time location data
|Jul 15, 2013
|Sep 2, 2014
|Honeywell International, Inc.
|Hand held bar code readers or mobile computers with cloud computing services
|Apr 20, 2012
|Nov 11, 2014
|Honeywell Scanning & Mobility
|Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to acquire images
|Mar 26, 2010
|Dec 9, 2014
|Claxton Engineering Services Limited
|Tubular connector
|Apr 20, 2012
|Apr 21, 2015
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to adjust transmit power level
|Jan 26, 2012
|May 26, 2015
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable RFID reading terminal with visual indication of scan trace
|May 17, 2012
|Jun 23, 2015
|Honeywell International Inc.
|Cloud-based system for reading of decodable indicia
|Jul 10, 2012
|Jul 28, 2015
|Honeywell International Inc.
|Cloud-based system for processing of decodable indicia
|Oct 4, 2012
|Oct 20, 2015
|Delta Faucet Company
|Fitting connection including compression nut with retainer
|Mar 24, 2014
|Oct 20, 2015
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|System and method for calibration and mapping of real-time location data
|Aug 25, 2014
|Dec 29, 2015
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Hand held bar code readers or mobile computers with cloud computing services
|May 20, 2015
|Feb 9, 2016
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable RFID reading terminal with visual indication of scan trace
|Jun 19, 2015
|Jul 19, 2016
|Honeywell International Inc.
|Cloud-based system for reading of decodable indicia
|Apr 20, 2012
|Sep 13, 2016
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to locate groups of RFID tags
|Jan 29, 2016
|Sep 27, 2016
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable RFID reading terminal with visual indication of scan trace
|Apr 2, 2015
|Oct 18, 2016
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to adjust transmit power level
|Dec 28, 2015
|Dec 27, 2016
|Honeywell International
|Hand held bar code readers or mobile computers with cloud computing services
|Sep 23, 2015
|Jan 3, 2017
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|System and method for calibration and mapping of real-time location data
|May 15, 2012
|Jan 31, 2017
|Honeywell International, Inc.
|Encoded information reading terminal configured to pre-process images
|Oct 8, 2014
|Feb 7, 2017
|Swagelok Company
|Conduit fitting with pull-up indication
|Sep 9, 2013
|Mar 14, 2017
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Initial point establishment using an image of a portion of an object
|Dec 29, 2015
|Apr 11, 2017
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable RFID reading terminal with visual indication of scan trace
|Nov 4, 2014
|May 16, 2017
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to acquire images
|Sep 23, 2016
|May 16, 2017
|Hand Held Products, Inc.
|Portable RFID reading terminal with visual indication of scan trace
|Jul 15, 2016
|May 30, 2017
|Honeywell International, Inc.
|Cloud-based system for reading of decodable indicia
|Mar 5, 2010
|Sep 2, 2010
|Swagelok Company
|Conduit fitting with pull-up indication
|Mar 26, 2010
|Apr 26, 2012
|Claxton Engineering Services Limited
|Tubular connector
|U.S. Classification
|285/3, 285/323, 285/249, 285/389
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Nov 5, 2007
Owner name: SWAGELOK COMPANY, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BENNETT, MARK A.;WILLIAMS, PETER C.;REEL/FRAME:020066/0274
Effective date: 20040324
Owner name: SWAGELOK COMPANY,OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BENNETT, MARK A.;WILLIAMS, PETER C.;REEL/FRAME:020066/0274
Effective date: 20040324
|Oct 5, 2010
|Certificate of correction
|Sep 12, 2013
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4