text:
Cloudberry Body Soap
These fine triple milled soaps are made with inspiration from old Swedish beauty traditions for pure and glowing skin.
Developed to take care of your skin, the soaps have been enriched with shea butter, swedish honey and cloudberry.
Enjoy the sweet and fresh fragrance that takes your mind to tempting juicy fruit on a warm summer's day.
Add some water to the soap and work up a rich lather in the palms of your hands.
Smooth the creamy foam onto moist skin and then rinse off with comfortably warm water.
Sodium Palm Kernelate, Sodium Palmate, Aqua, Glycerin, Palm Kernel Acid, Palm Acid, Parfum, Sodium Chloride, Olea Europaea fruit oil, Butyrospermum parkil butter (shea butter), Lanolin, Mel, Vaccinium Myrtillus seed oil, Sodium lactate, Lecithin, Albumen, Rosa Damascena Extract, Tetrasodium EDTA, Tetrasodium Etidronate, CI 17200 (D&C red no. 33), CI 74160 (Blue no. 404), Coumarin, Citronellol, Limonene, Eugenol, Alpha-isomethyl ionone.
*Ingredients may be subject to change. The most accurate and up to date product ingredient list can also found on the product packaging.


text:
We help you locate a Chatham tin whistle tutor. Tin Whistle tuition are the perfect method to learn a stimulating new hobby, pick up a new talent and attain confidence with tin whistle. Try our service to search for Chatham tin whistle teachers and choose which best matches your requirements so you can begin your tin whistle tuition in Chatham today!
This is the only place to find Chatham tin whistle teachers in the UK, helping you discover Chatham tin whistle tuition close to you and Chatham teachers to assist with any instrument such as piano, violin or guitar. We can help you find Chatham tin whistle lessons or a one-to-one Chatham tin whistle tutor to prepare for tin whistle grades and improve your tin whistle skills! We order Chatham tin whistle teachers near you according to their lesson charges and proximity to you.
If you are a tin whistle tutor and would like to offer your tin whistle tuition services in Chatham or anywhere else across the UK, please register with First Tutors: Music or learn about us here. Becoming a Chatham tin whistle teacher is a brilliant way to re-affirm your own skills through giving tin whistle tuition while helping someone else, all in the Chatham area!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Gaga One Beach Club (Povoa de Varzim – portugal 11 may 2013) Fotos by Hugo Aboal
[nggallery id=52]
[nggallery id=52]
Currently there are no comments related to this article. You have a special honor to be the first commenter. Thanks!
You must be logged in to post a comment..
@ 2012 Jesús del Campo Derechos de Autor. Webmaster y Diseño SKMedia (Social Media Solutions)


text:
Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Original Pictures Forum' started by B&B LAWN, Apr 12, 2007.
a few pics of my equipment
you need a trimmer rack-other wise you have good taste in equiptment. at least we have many of the same things -including the el cheapo pole trimmer=lol!
yeah! i had one on my old trailer. i just got this trailer about a month ago and im getting a box made to put on the front
Nice stuff, how do you like that blade sharpener?
Nice stuff.
nice stuff....i like the shapening station alot..
thanks guys! i am really enjoying the sharpener, it saves a ton of time. i would highly recommend it


text:
1968 mercedes 280sl pagoda
Price: US $59,000.00 Item location: West Hollywood, California, United States
- Condition: Used
- Make: Mercedes-Benz
- Model: SL-Class
- SubModel: 280 SL
- Type: Convertible
- Doors: 2
- Year: 1968
- Mileage: 89,500
- Color: White
- Engine size: 6 cylinder
- Number of cylinders: 6
- Transmission: Manual
- Drivetrain: Rear Wheel Drive
- Interior color: Black
- Vehicle Title: Clear Want to buy? Contact seller!
1968 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 280 SL
1968 Mercedes 280sl 4 speed with A/, factory books and tool, service records,numbers matching engine,original fenders and hood, dry trunk floor, driver quality conditio, interior has original carpet, floor mats, door panel, no crack steering wheel, all gauges and lights work, exterior of carhas been repainted, but engine compartmen, door jams and dash have not. the hardtop is in beautiful shap, including headliner and chrome . Any money you put in this car you will get bac, 280sl's in this condition and at this price are hard to find !
Will be happy to answer anyquestions


text:
Zendaya's Dress at Grammys Afterparty 2016
All Eyes Were on Zendaya's Sexy Belted Boots at the Grammys Afterparty
They say at the afterparty, you might want to slip into something a bit more comfortable. But Zendaya took the opposite route at the Grammys. While the star walked the red carpet in a roomy DSquared2 suit, she showed her edgy side once the ceremony was over.
Zendaya slipped into a look from the Fausto Puglisi Pre-Fall collection, a sheer chiffon gown that featured lace sleeves and a plunging neckline, which let her bra peek through. A thick, double-buckle belt clasped her dress, and as for her shoes? Well, thank goodness her dress featured a leg slit, or we wouldn't have been able to see those killer buckle thigh-highs.
Even if Zendaya's outfit is too fierce for your own taste, there's no denying she wore it with confidence, lifting her train and posing for the camera so we could see all the little details. Scroll to zoom in on what was surely one of the sexiest looks of the night.


text:
Recently added item(s)
You have no items in your shopping cart.
FREE UK Delivery Over £75
Order by 2pm for NEXT DAY DELIVERY
Regular Price:
Special Price
Out of stock
Presenting the very pretty CHING CHING Skater Dress in GREEN taken from the latest collection at quirky cool designer clothing brand Sugarhill Boutique. The stylish Sugarhill dress is a must have statement piece this season. complete with a classic crew neck collar, short sleeves and skater skirt. The stunning Sugarhill dress also features an open detail on the reverse and a contrasting camera print design throughout. View the full range of Sugarhill Boutique available online at Excel Clothing.
UK and IRELAND - £3.95 (1-3 working days)Currently FREE for orders over £75.
NEXT DAY UK Delivery* - £6.95*Must be ordered before 2pm - Monday to ThursdayOrders placed after 2pm Thursday to Sunday PM with ship next working day, normally Monday.
Europe - £10.00 (2-5 working days)Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, China and United Arab Emirates - £20 (5-10 working days)USA and Canada - £15 (2-7 working days)Russia - £25 (5-10 working days)Australia and New Zealand - £35.00 (7-10 working days)
Please click on the links here for full details of our delivery charges and returns policy.
If you are not completely satisfied with your purchase, please return the item or items to us in their original condition complete with all labels & tags within 15 days of receipt.
On receipt of the goods and upon satisfactory inspection of your return we will issue a refund for the goods.
Refund timescales may vary so please allow 10 working days for the refund to appear on your credit card or bank statement.
Some products are non-returnable for hygiene reasons. Excel Clothing is not liable for the cost of returning items.
At present, goods cannot be returned to stores directly. Any incurred shipping costs are non-refunable.


text:
Lenovo Mobile Service Center in Palakkad With Customer Care Number
Lenovo Authorized Mobile Service Center in Palakkad, Kerala
If you are facing any technical issue with your Lenovo mobile or General Enquiries like Warranty, Service, Product issues, General Support and Technical Support .You can Contact any of the listed Lenovo Mobile service centres to resolve the problem.
You can find Lenovo mobile service center list and information like Contact Number, Address, Customer Care Information in and around Palakkad.
Lenovo Mobile Service center provide Services for all latest product like: Vibe P1, Vibe P1m, Vibe S1 ,VIBE X2, VIBE Z2 Pro, VIBE Z, VIBE X, A2010, A5000, A7000, A6000 Plus, A6000, A328, RocStar (A319), A536, Lenovo K3 Note, LenovoK900, S60, S90, S580, S850, S820, S650, S660, S860, P70, P780.
List Of Lenovo Mobile Service Center In Palakkad:
Service Center Name : Wega Electronics
Address : SOUPRABHA,15/689-1,NEAR SOUTH POLICE STATION,KUNNATHURMEDU,PALAKKAD -678013, Palakkad, Kerala a.
Contact Number : 049-125-004-01/645-515-5
Working Hours : 9:30 AM – 18:30 PM
Lenovo Mobile Customer Care Number In Palakkad
Customer Care Number / Toll Free : 1800-3000-7678
Email : email@example.com
Working : 10am – 7pm, Monday – Saturday
(Except Public Holidays)
You have find useful information of Service Center List & Customer Care Number. If you have any other queries contact us.


text:
Ugliest Dog Dies
March 16, 2012 by staff
Ugliest Dog Dies, When a beloved pet dies, manners usually dictate saying something nice about the departed. For Yoda, to say she sure was ugly was praise.
Yoda won the 2011 World's Ugliest Dog contest at the Sonoma Marin Fair for her short tufts of hair, protruding tongue, and long, seemingly hairless legs.
The Chinese crested and Chihuahua mix died in her sleep Saturday. She was 15.
The 1.8-pound pooch lived a rough life before Terry Schumacher found her abandoned behind an apartment building and mistook her for a rat.
The dog went on to bag $1,000 and a trophy 15 times her size when she won the contest in Petaluma, Calif., last June. Contest producer Vicki DeArmon said Yoda will keep the title until a new ugliest is crowned in June.
Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.


text:
What is JotForm?
JotForm is a free online form builder which helps you create online forms without writing a single line of code. No sign-up required.
At JotForm, we want to make sure that you're getting the online form builder help that you need. Our friendly customer support team is available 24/7.
We believe that if one user has a question, there could be more users who may have the same question. This is why many of our support forum threads are public and available to be searched and viewed. If you'd like help immediately, feel free to search for a similar question, or submit your question or concern.
Email Notification: Prefilled field with the browser or device type of the end userAsked by Marc on July 14, 2013 at 12:10 PM
On the email notification form, a prefilled field for browser type or device type to return
Thank you for your suggestion. I have added the said feature request on our nice to do list and hopefully our developers will be able to implement this feature.
Thank you.
Thank you. IP address remains in the email notification, maybe future similiar info should be in hidden fields.
To achieve your requirement, you need to add the "IP Address" field in your notification email. Please refer this screenshot:
Let us know if you need further assistance.


text:
I have only ever used loose powder foundation (mostly bareMinerals). It was the first type of makeup I tried because it seemed easy to use and I just stuck with it. I've been using it for close to ten years now. However, lately I've been getting curious about liquid makeup. I have literally never used it, except concealer.
I have acne prone combination skin, so if I tried a liquid foundation, I would go for a balancing one- I've been looking at Origins "Stay Tuned" balancing face makeup. It seems like liquid foundation might provide better, longer lasting coverage than powder foundation. But it also seems like it would be harder to apply evenly and harder to match to my skin tone. Plus, I have heard that it is more likely to clog pores, which would be the last thing I need.
Have you tried both liquid and powder foundation? How do they compare? What would you recommend? What is your skin type and how has your skin reacted to each?
Most Helpful Girl
Yes I have both. I feel like liquid you really need to spend the time to apply it evenly and carefully, whereas powder you can just run the sponge over your face and you're pretty much done. You can control the amount of stuff you put on your face easier with the powder by layering and stuff, but liquid not really. I also find blending a lot easier with powder. So as you can tell I definitely prefer powder lol. My skin type is combination with cystic acne so yeahhhh. No liquid for me because it makes my face feel ever grosser, no matter how "weightless" or "breathable" the liquid types claim to be.00|00|0


text:
Photos are for members only!!
Peachmate is a 100% free sex site for adults looking for fun with no strings attached.
Escort ads, casual sex groups, personal ads, video chat and much more.
Elko guy.I like shooting and ATV riding. I think it is fun to meet new people. Don't be shy.


text:
This is just disgraceful and pathetic. At a Walmart (of course) in Florida (of course), two women got into a fist fight replete with pulling hair and profanity over the last case of water on the shelf. They were part of the last minute rush to get supplies before Hurricane Matthew hit. The best of humanity this is not. One gal was bigger than most men and hit just as hard. The other was small and skinny, but scrappy as heck. Both are embarrassing to watch. This is Obama's America.
Hurricane Matthew has killed over 800 in Haiti alone. The last time I checked on it last night it was a Category 2 and not nearly as bad as expected. Homes have been destroyed and the flooding and storm surge are epic. The hurricane weakened Saturday morning to a Category 1 storm with maximum sustained winds of 85 miles per hour. It pounded Florida, but it stayed offshore and spared the state a direct hit. Hyped by everyone out there as a killer, people were in a panic to stock up. Anyone with sense evacuated… others wasted time by brawling in Walmart.
From BizPac Review:
As Hurricane Matthew crept ever closer to the south eastern cost of the U.S. people began to panic and tempers flared in a South Florida Walmart when two women got in a brawl over the last case of water.
As the media continued its hype over the now Category 3 storm, residents in the areas about to be hit by Hurricane Matthew rushed to local stores to buy up supplies in case the crisis lasted longer than a day or two.
The two women, one clearly with a size and power advantage, began mixing it up over the water as shocked onlookers gathered around them, the Mirror reported.
It is unclear who threw the first punch, but clearly the taller woman is getting the best of the one in the print dress. The the scrappy smaller woman refuses to be put off and repeatedly jumps back into the fray even when the bigger woman walks away two times.
You would think an emergency like this would bring people together… instead, many act like animals. There is no excuse for behavior like this. Many people always have preps ready in case of a storm like this. People had well over a week of warning and most evacuated areas that could have taken a big hit. But there are always those who will wait till the last minute.
Gas lines are long and you have no guarantee of getting any fuel at all. Places are boarded and shut down. Overall, I would say the US was very lucky and mostly dodged this monster.
Over 1 million people in Florida are without power today. At least five people are dead because of this storm. We are not done with Matthew yet and the looters are out en force. I hope everyone stays safe. You can replace 'stuff', but not your life.


text:
What is JotForm?
JotForm is a free online form builder which helps you create online forms without writing a single line of code. No sign-up required.
At JotForm, we want to make sure that you're getting the online form builder help that you need. Our friendly customer support team is available 24/7.
We believe that if one user has a question, there could be more users who may have the same question. This is why many of our support forum threads are public and available to be searched and viewed. If you'd like help immediately, feel free to search for a similar question, or submit your question or concern.
My forms have been disabledAsked by MichaelOluoch on June 03, 2014 at 05:38 AM
hi all my forms the following site have be disabled
In one of the form i was asking for email acc only as i am building and on subcription form with an other software (the email will be for resting password in case someone forgets
see link
JotForm Support
Hello MichaelOluoch,
Upon checking your account I found that it's suspended by our anti-phishing system. We have automated anti-phishing system which scans all forms and mark them with probability of being used for phishing activities.
Upon taking a closer look at your form, I can confirm that it's not being used for any phishing activities. I have activated your account now.
I'm sorry for the trouble caused to you.
Thank you!


text:
22 Feb 15
When you're next in the market for buying a second hand car, it's important that you first create a detailed checklist to protect yourself against budget busters, common scams, deception and full-on fraud.
Whether you're keen to make your big-ticket car purchase via a private seller or licensed dealership, you must remain vigilant for encumbered or stolen vehicles. The following CarHistory tips should steer you in the right direction and protect your finances.
If you know the model/s that suit your specific needs, it's time to learn their market value. Online price guides will help to ensure you don't pay above the odds.
Before you go anywhere near a dealership or private seller, set yourself a realistic budget. Without a budget, you risk overextending yourself. Remember to include insurance, regular maintenance, registration and running costs in your sums.
Take the time to assess the deal thoroughly. Remember the old adage: if it seems too good to be true, it probably is. Very low priced vehicles should set off alarm bells.
Unless you're purchasing online and have conducted in-depth CarHistory reports, never, ever transfer your hard-earned cash to a seller before giving the car the once over in person.
To the untrained eye, it may be hard to spot a vehicle that's been written off and repaired. And there's no guarantee a car seller will let you in on their little secret.
CarHistory reports establish whether used cars have a secret history of write offs, theft, storm damage, flood damage or an inaccurate odometer.


text: It took me a while to really realize that I'm back but now it truely feels like I've never left the country. I came back this friday around 11:00am and it was the most awesome thing ever to walk out of that airport gate and see me family standing there waiting for me to finally come home. I started crying like a baby and didn't even realize what was going on around me but my sister was the first one that hugged me and wouldn't let go. Everyone was there and it meant so much to me. The same day my family planned a party for me and most of my friends and loved ones were there. That's were the pictures were taken. My sister and my step-brother made the banner for me which I think is super adorable. My friends and I are in the picture on the left and for everyone who is wondering who the old dude in the right picture is, just kidding, that's my dad! I had a great time back home so far and I have millions of pictures to edit from New York City to show y'all! There coming up!


text: London (ANI): Singer Robbie Williams has revealed that he would love to shake a leg on the next series of Britains TV show Strictly Come Dancing. The 15-time BRIT Award-winning singer, who began his career as a member of the pop band Take That in 1990, which he left in 1995 to begin his solo career, said he would be ready with his moves to woo the audience by the end of 2009.You can expect me on Celebrity Come Dancing towards the end of summer next year, the Mirror quoted him as saying. The 34-year-old songwriter admitted on his website that he was at the end of his tether to leave LA and get back to his native England despite its characteristic weather.He said: But Ive had enough here for now. It was my recent trip to England that did it. I felt plugged in. Roots! I really miss it. For all its crap weather, I need to be among Brits again.


text:
Hi! Thank you so much for stopping by.
ThisBeautifuLife is meant for those with an insatiable thirst for knowledge, inspiration, & living. All things as they pertain to travel and purpose, existential rants, and thought provoking imagery – by Arnelle Lozada.
Arnelle Lozada is an LA/SF based Content Producer, Photographer & Marketing Professional who specializes in producing compelling still/motion visuals and branded content, with a knack for storytelling and creative writing. She produces/has produced content for great brands such as Travel Channel, Urban Decay, Hudson Jeans, Blurb, Ancestry, Prynt, and GoPro, both as a Content Producer and as a blogger. She has a sincere passion for meaningful storytelling with an emphasis on traveling with purpose. She finds the most personally fulfilling work is where she uses her skills to serve causes larger than herself, so she works regularly with nonprofit organizations focusing on humanitarian efforts, with a newfound passion for wildlife conservation work as well.
"Passion will make you crazy, but is there any other way to live?" – Howard Hughes
"Let the beauty we love be what we do." – Rumi
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." – Charles Bukowski
"The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars." – Jack Kerouac
"A non-writing writer is a monster courting insanity." – Franz Kafka
"It doesn't interest me what you do for a living. I want to know what you ache for, and if you dare to dream of meeting your heart's longing. It doesn't interest me how old you are. I want to know if you will risk looking like a fool for love, for your dream, for the adventure of being alive." – Oriah Mountain Dreamer


text:
Helpful Links
We've put the information at your fingertips. Whether you're buying a home, financing a vehicle, or just need to understand your credit score, use the resources compiled below to help you find answers. These links provide quick access to the sites you'll want to visit over and over, any time you want!
Verified by Visa
Credit Bureau Links:
Honda Federal Credit Union does not endorse or guarantee the products, information or recommendations provided by these links. Honda FCU is not liable for any failure of products or services advertised on these sites. Each third-party site may have a privacy policy different from Honda FCU and the linked third-party websites may provide less security than the Honda FCU site.


text:
windows server 2008 R2 Cluster
Hi we are trying to install a application through a controller...
when the cotroller install a application and it started to install another application that dependent on earlier one...
wen the controller trying to get logon token....the first installed application throwing Authentication failed exception.....
the node contains SINGLE DOMAIN and single user....
and the error details are captured in event viewer audit failure
Verified: NTLM authentication setting in local policies ---set properly
User name and password-- correctly given
7 Replies
Sep 16, 2011 at 7:11 UTC
Bluecube ICT is an IT service provider.
have you tried a remote connection/setup? otherwise a try setting up the profile/user up through cmd?
Sep 16, 2011 at 7:42 UTC
Am trying from command prompt....
Sep 16, 2011 at 8:12 UTC
Bluecube ICT is an IT service provider.
and still no luck?
what is the command you use in cmd?
Sep 16, 2011 at 10:59 UTC
its a SOAP call from other application.....
and i could see this problem in Windows server 2008 R2 cluster only...in all other environments its working properly
Sep 16, 2011 at 11:01 UTC
the application is installed in various types of servers...and that too be the problem is specific to that setup...and we could not see the same issue in other similar setups of WIN2008R2...
is there any specific domain rules or policies effects?
Sep 20, 2011 at 6:17 UTC
Bluecube ICT is an IT service provider.
im not to sure.... is the AP a windows based application? or linux?
Sep 20, 2011 at 10:39 UTC
it will support all the OS............and the problem is specific to that cluster setup only....we have verified with other setup's where its working fine
This discussion has been inactive for over a year.
You may get a better answer to your question by starting a new discussion.


text:
HAMBURG, Germany, Nov 19 (Reuters) - Continental AG won the "lion's share" of a large order from Chrysler to provide the ESP anti-rollover system for sport utility vehicles (SUVs), the German car parts group said on Friday. Continental will now supply all of the Big Three U.S. carmakers after winning an order from General Motors as well, said company spokesman Hannes Boekhoff. Chrysler, the U.S. unit of DaimlerChrysler , said on Thursday it will make the Electronic Stability Programme ...
Premium Content (PAID Subscription Required)
"Continental gets Chrysler order for ESP system" is part of the paid WardsAuto Premium content. You must log in with Premium credentials in order to access this article. Premium paid subscribers also gain access to:
All of WardsAuto's reliable, in-depth industry reporting and analysis
Hundreds of downloadable data tables including:
• Global sales and production data by country
• U.S. model-line inventory data
• Engine and equipment installation rates
• WardsAuto's North America Plant by Platform forecast
• Product Cycle chart
• Interrelationships among major OEMs
• Medium- and heavy-duty truck volumes
• Historical data and much more!
For WardsAuto.com pricing and subscription information please contact
Lisa Williamson by email: firstname.lastname@example.com or phone: (248) 799-2642
Current subscribers, please login or CLICK for support information.


text:
What is JotForm?
JotForm is a free online form builder which helps you create online forms without writing a single line of code. No sign-up required.
At JotForm, we want to make sure that you're getting the online form builder help that you need. Our friendly customer support team is available 24/7.
We believe that if one user has a question, there could be more users who may have the same question. This is why many of our support forum threads are public and available to be searched and viewed. If you'd like help immediately, feel free to search for a similar question, or submit your question or concern.
Payments With AccountsAsked by blueagave on November 24, 2015 at 01:07 PM
We are currently using JotForm to allow our customers to make orders. We do not currently accept payments via our forms but would like to. My question is we have many customers who order services from us frequently. Is there a way to have them sign up for an account and store their payment details so they do not need to re-enter them every time they place an order. Note we do not want to make them sign up for a paypal account.
JotForm Support
Unfortunately that is not possible to achieve. When you use payment tools inside of your form, third party like PayPal, Stripe etc. are collecting credit card details and we do not have those kind of information. They will need to enter credit card details every time they want to place an order.
Inside of this articles you can find out more about payment tools and how to set payment form:
Hope this will help. Let us know if you need further assistance.


text:
Plet: A Christmas Tale of the Wasatch
Lambourne, Alfred
Place Published: New York
Publisher: Dodge Publishing Company
Date Published: 1906
Binding: Hardcover
Book Id: 14176
80pp. Octavo [24.5 cm] Light brown smooth cloth with title stamped in brown on front board and backstrip. Very good. Ex ward library with usual marks Includes thirteen illustrations by Utah artist and poet, Alfred Lambourne.
By This Author: Lambourne, Alfred
By This Publisher: Dodge Publishing Company


text:
Hotel Metro Tower, Delhi
Hotel Metro Tower Vasant Kunj Airport Road, Near IGI nternational & Domestic Airport, Opposite Maruti Apra Showroom , Mata Chowk, Mahipalpur, New Delhi – 110037
Hotel Metro Tower Details
Hotel Metro Tower is just 3 km (10 mins. drive) from Delhi IGI International & Domestic airport. The hotel with a unique blend of Indian traditions backed with world-class hospitality at its best. This luxury Delhi hotel is ideally located at Mahipalpur, a hotel near International/ Domestic Airport Delhi.
With easy access to most of the corporate and financial centers, historic monuments, ministries, embassies and 3 km's away from international and domestic airports which makes a perfect destination for a international traveler looking for business or leisure.
The hotel is easy to access to attractions like Qutub minar, Shiv murti complex, Embassy area, shopping malls like promenade and ambience malls. Local bazaars are also near from this place where you can get variety of things at a reasonable price.


text:
Noted physicist Werner Heisenberg said the act of observing something changes it. That's certainly true for your data. Every time you access a piece of information on your network, you leave a fingerprint. That can compromise the metadata used to validate the information. USB Write Blocker is our application that uses the Windows registry to write-block USB devices. It's a useful tool for those who wish to view the contents of USB drives without making changes to the files' metadata or timestamps.
This is a critical feature in the fields of digital and computer forensics, as well as eDiscovery, where time stamps play a crucial role in the validity of evidence.
An added feature of the DSi USB Write Blocker app is the ability to see the application status in your task bar when you hover over its icon with your mouse (as seen in the screenshot below).
Please fill out the form below to obtain your free copy of USB Write Blocker
Learn more about keeping your data safe.
• Avoiding Data Spoliation with USB Write Blocker (blog)
• The Importance of Checking the Security of Your Law Firm (blog)


text:
About the Book
This book tells no story. It is intended as a coffee table book of images the author wishes to share. Borrowing from Lord Byron's writing, the title expresses the author/photographer's love of the natural world and his images illustrate the same. Enjoy!
Features & Details
- Category Arts & Photography
Large Format Landscape, 13×11 in, 33×28 cm
356 Pages
- Publish Date Jun 12, 2008
- Tags photography, art, travel, flowers.wildlife
See More
Log in or create an account to post a comment.
0 Comments
Delete this comment?
See More


text:
In its promotional material, the 2013 Infiniti JX is touted as having "inspired performance for seven." There's no doubt it handles better than the hulking, truck-based QX56, but the combination of a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and a tall body don't really make for sporty handling.
The JX has only a sole powertrain, a 265-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 that produces 248 pound-feet of torque. It's paired with the latest iteration of Nissan's CVT. Drivers can select among four different drive modes: Eco, Standard, Sport, and Snow. Each maps the throttle response and transmission control settings differently to change the performance characteristics of the car.
Eco is best avoided unless you're on long flat stretches of road; it can be frustrating in suburban traffic, and if you're trying to press on, the Eco pedal--which pushes back if you accelerate too sharply--quickly becomes annoying. We liked the Sport mode better; it's unusual in that it directs the CVT to mimic a conventional six-speed automatic, with defined shift points and a linear relationship between engine speed and road speed. The penalty is a few percentage points of fuel efficiency. We weren't able to experiment with the Snow mode during our test drive in Charleston, South Carolina.
On the road, performance is adequate but not particularly enthusiastic. The JX is quiet, with the CVT keeping engine speeds relatively low unless it's asked for full acceleration, when it gets somewhat louder. There's plenty of interior storage space for front-seat passengers, and we suspect most families will find it meets their needs--even if one parent prefers to take a sport sedan to work.
The base JX is front-wheel drive, and the optional all-wheel-drive system prioritizes drive to the front wheels until it senses wheel slip or other traction problems. Then it can shift up to half the torque to the rear wheels, making this a practical vehicle for muddy soccer fields and horse paddocks, but hardly an off-road rock climber. Infiniti projects that six out of 10 JX models will be ordered with AWD.
The 2013 Infiniti JX can tow up to 3,500 pounds once an accessory trailer hitch has been fitted (for $370). That said, serious trailer towers are more likely to opt for the larger, brawnier QX56, and Infiniti says only a fifth of JX owners will ever tow anything.


text:
Hello, kamusta? (what's up)
My name is Karla Thea but you can call me KT, Pinaynomad or Anytime. (youtube link)
Welcome to my travel and fitness blog! I appreciate you stopping by!
I started this blog as a creative outlet to share my thoughts, travel adventures, fitness inspirations, and love of everything nice. My dream is to make money online and throw a dart at a map and travel to wherever it lands. I know, I know. Easier said than done. Dreams don't work unless you do it. That's why I left my marketing career and focused on being a digital nomad. Being your own boss is great coz you get to choose which 18 hours of the day you work. 😉
I love to share my knowledge, travel experience and fitness tips in all forms of media! So…
Want to work with me? ktmamalio (@) gmail (.) com
Also join me on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter ♥


text:
Hello everybody,
I am looking for ideas on how to mass install a shortcut for all the users on my network 100+
Basically I designed a simple program for submitting helpdesk tickets that go to our existing helpdesk mail queue (sorry spiceworks.) Now I have the program hosted on a share drive that everybody can access I just want to put a shortcut to it on their desktops without having to go to each one and do it manually.
Does anybody have an idea of how I can accomplish this on a massive level that will cover the PCs on my network? Thanks
19 Replies
Sep 29, 2010 at 12:51 UTC
if you use login scripts you can xcopy it to every users desktop from a shared location.
you could put this in a batch file:
if not exist "%userprofile%\Desktop\shortcut.url"
(copy "\\192.168.100.1\shared_location\shortcut.url" "%USERPROFILE%\Desktop")
ELSE ( echo SHORTCUT ALREADY EXISTS ON THIS USERS DESKTOP.)
Sep 29, 2010 at 12:57 UTC
Ya login vb script will do it just create the script to create the desktop shortcut icon with a path to your ticketing system address, and then run this in group policy login script.
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:01 UTC
Works for me. Thanks guys!
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:03 UTC
Group Policy Preferences would be a quick and easy way to do this as well.
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:04 UTC
1st Post
Like Kyle R said, same idea here.
I'm the administrator of a call center, and I use a VB script combined with a group policy login script to push the necessary shortcuts out to all the desktops. The only thing is the shortcuts get recreated every time the person logs in, which is great in our case because we had a habit of people deleting desktop shortcuts and then saying that they couldn't do work...
Anyway, here's a sample of the VB script that I have. I don't know if Spiceworks will allow me to post code or not...
******************************Code Start*******************************
'Create a WshShell Object
Set WshShell = Wscript.CreateObject("Wscript.Shell")
'Create a WshShortcut Object
Set oShellLink = WshShell.CreateShortcut(StrPath& "\Desktop\Shortcut Name.lnk")
'Set the Target path for the shortcut
oShellLink.TargetPath = "about:blank"
'Set the icon
oShellLink.IconLocation = StrPath1& "\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe,1"
'Save the shortcut
***********************Code End***************************
The Group Policy login script is applied to a users OU for just the users of our call center.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:07 UTC
Better off using ALL USERS profile so it will populates to any new users profile as well
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:08 UTC
personally id rather use a free msi packager and push it out via group policy.
The issue with doing it via a login script is that unless you script it to check if the file already exists it will overwrite the file every time someone logs in. Also you would be applying it at a per user basis so every user would copy the file down each time they log in and place on thier desktop.
Grab this (it has an understandable gui and is free)
when creating the package, set the install location to default to the all users profile (think cmd variables like %temp%)
Setup a GPO to run the package (Software Installation) and apply it to the OU with your computer accounts in.
This will now install it on the desktop (for example) for the all users profile of each machine.
The advantage of this method is that it only installs once per machine for all users, the gpo runs with the system account so no issues with permissions and unlike a script its invisible in its running state.
Also forgot to mention that if you place it in the all users folder then they wont be able to remove it as chances are they wont have permissions
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:10 UTC
I tried to use
xcopy "\\Server\Web\HelpDeskTicket.lnk" "%USERPROFILE%\Desktop\HelpDeskTicket.lnk"
and when I do it prompts me to specify if it's a file or directory before it copies. How can that automatically adjust it for file?
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:24 UTC
Thanks for the links to try but neither seem to work correctly. If I could just get the batch file to auto fill that it's a file it should work. Ahhhh love programming. It makes me feel so helpless at times =)
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:26 UTC
I don't want to push an MSI because I want the program to be able to be updated and instantly be accessable for users. If I do MSI it will require a upgrade for each individual version.
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:30 UTC
try this instead if you want to use a batch file
xcopy "\\Server\Web\HelpDeskTicket.lnk" "%USERPROFILE%\Desktop\HelpDeskTicket.lnk" /i
This will assume it is a directory is the destination has more than 1 file... which it wont as were specifying a single file to move
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:30 UTC
I just use a GPO with the Internet Explorer add on, I have like 8 or 9 that get add to the favs when anyone even new users log in.
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:32 UTC
I don't want to push an MSI because I want the program to be able to be updated and instantly be accessable for users. If I do MSI it will require a upgrade for each individual version.
That is true. I tend to do it for larger files (like my logmein free silent installer)
Sep 29, 2010 at 1:41 UTC
Yay found a solution
ECHO F | XCOPY "\\Server\Web\HelpdeskTicket.lnk" "%USERPROFILE%\Desktop\Helpdesk Ticket.lnk"
That ECHO F | in front auto pressed the F when it asked. Now if I add that to a login script it should work with no problems. Thanks for talking me through it everybody
Sep 30, 2010 at 9:51 UTC
Use this all the time. Applied with GPO logon script. Looks for shortcut first. If not creates
For XP:
Dim WshShell, objFSO, objShell, intRunError
Set WshShell = Wscript.createobject("Wscript.shell")
Set objFSO = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
Set objShell = CreateObject("Wscript.Shell")
'Check if helpdesk shortcut exists; if not create it.
If objFSO.FileExists("C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Desktop\shortcut.url") = False then
objFSO.CopyFile "\\server\shortcuts\shortcut.url", "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Desktop\Shortcut.url"
End If
Set WshShell = Nothing
Set objFSO = Nothing
For Windows 7
Dim WshShell, objFSO, objShell, intRunError
Set WshShell = Wscript.createobject("Wscript.shell")
Set objFSO = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
Set objShell = CreateObject("Wscript.Shell")
'Check if helpdesk shortcut exists; if not create it.
If objFSO.FileExists("C:\Users\Public\Desktop\Shortcut.url") = False then
objFSO.CopyFile "\\Server\shortcuts\Shortcut.url", "c:\users\public\Desktop\Shortcut.url"
End If
Set WshShell = Nothing
Set objFSO = Nothing
Sep 30, 2010 at 11:51 UTC
I just create the shortcut and copy it to the NETLOGON share of my domain and then add the following line to my logon batch file:
xcopy "\\domain.local\netlogon\shortcut.lnk" "%userprofile%\Desktop" /D
It's very simple and the /D parameter will only copy the file if the destination file doesn't exist or is older than the source and the %userprofile% variable makes it work on any Windows flavor.
I've never had a problem with that command asking if it's a file or folder.
Sep 30, 2010 at 1:26 UTC
We have used the Group Policy method to deploy all out shortcuts.
Works well, can be changed on the fly, and then the group targetted gets the updated link / location / or tool with each GP refresh.
Like the fact that we can target certain AD groups with a shortcut or drive mapping, and only they get it. Can re use same letter for drive map based on security group, cool!
This discussion has been inactive for over a year.
You may get a better answer to your question by starting a new discussion.


text:
Victoria Crossroads (GNIS FID: 509288) is a populated place located in Hancock County at latitude 37.748 and longitude -86.678.
The elevation of Victoria Crossroads is 705 feet. Victoria Crossroads appears on the Fordsville U.S. Geological Survey Map. Hancock County is in the Central Time Zone (UTC -6 hours).
Hancock County: Cities & Towns | ZIP Codes | Features (airports, churches, hospitals, etc.)
BIG Map |
Driving Directions |
Data Source - USGS GNIS FID: 509288
BOUNDARY MAPS: Patesville Division | Hancock County
Cloverport, KY
(6.4 miles NNE)
Fordsville, KY (8 miles SSW)
Hawesville, KY (11.4 miles NNW)
Whitesville, KY (11.5 miles WSW)
Cannelton, IN
(11.8 miles NNW)
Hardinsburg, KY (12.1 miles E)
Tell City, IN (14.9 miles NNW)
Sanders, KY
(1.9 miles W)
Easton, KY (2.7 miles S)
Patesville, KY (3.4 miles NW)
Mattingly, KY (4.3 miles ENE)
Arrington Corner, KY
(4.3 miles WNW)
Cabot, KY (4.3 miles SSE)
Tar Fork, KY (4.5 miles ESE)


text:
[caption id="attachment_418" align="alignleft" width="264"] Pilling Fabric[/caption] What is "pilling"? Have you ever purchased a new set of sheets only to find them becoming frayed after only a few weeks? Have you ever laid on a sheet consisting of nothing but bumps and fuzz? This agonizing situation can be known as "pilling". Pilling can be defined as a surface defect pertaining to the ends of the fibers; causing them to knot at the surface of the fabric, only to become a magnet for lint and dirt. How does it happen? Sheets pill through regular usage and repeated washing, which can also be escalated if one does not follow the washing instructions. In fact, the most common reason pilling happens with eLuxurySupply customers is because of not following the washing instructions. This is one of the most important steps in avoiding pilling. Cotton sheets, if not new, are especially vulnerable. Sheets that are made of a blend (like cotton-polyester) are more inclined to pill compared to sheets that are made of 100% cotton. What can be done to prevent it? Thankfully, there are ways of preventing this night-time turmoil. Washing your sheets with a short gentle wash cycle and using a mild liquid detergent can prevent many issues as well as extend the life of most sheets. Additionally, this will reduce fabric wear and prevent the fibers from fraying. Secondly, avoiding detergents that leave residue will prevent the fibers from balling and clumping together. People with oily skin are more likely to discover their side of the bed becomes more pilled than that of the opposite side. Avoiding cosmetics, creams, and lotions before bed can reduce the chance of pilling as well. [caption id="" align="alignleft" width="300"] Single-Ply, Egyptian Cotton Sheets - Medium Bue[/caption] Leaving sheets in the dryer will also thwart the effects of pilling. Letting a pair of sheets dry at room temperature rather than bake in the dryer for a while will lessen the chance of the sheets pilling substantially. There is not magical pair of "non-pilling" sheets, but there are higher-quality sheets that have a lower chance of pilling. Egyptian cotton sheets are made with single-ply fine fibers that have a very low chance of knotting and pilling. While this option may do considerably more damage to the pocket book, the upside is that you now own a luxurious and long-lasting set of sheets that (probably) won't pill. Want more information on bed sheet care? See our Bed Sheet Care Guide at eLuxurySupply.com.
eLuxury vs. Tuft & Needle Mattress Review
February 24, 2016
The Gross Truth About Pillows
February 19, 2016
What's the Difference? Mattress Pads vs. Mattress Toppers
February 16, 2016
What is gel memory foam?
February 12, 2016
Winter Blahs: Liven Things Up at Home
February 9, 2016
5 Must-Haves for Spring Break
February 5, 2016
10 Ways to Make Your Bed
November 3, 2015


text:
Details & Care
A soft tie centers a supportive halter bikini top designed with lightly padded cups and side boning to create a natural shape and comfortable fit.
- Ties behind neck and back.
- Removable cups.
- Lined.
- Polyester/elastane; hand wash.
- By Seafolly; imported.
- Women's Active & Swim.
- Item #691155
Actual garment label may reflect Australian sizing; order by the US size conversions listed above.
Activewear Glossary
Activewear Glossary
'East Coast' Halter Bikini Top


text:
A Lower Township man was arrested and charged with distributing child pornography, Cape May County Prosecutor Robert L. Taylor and Lower Township Police Chief Brian Marker said in a press release.
Robert Hedley III was charged with second -degree distribution and fourth-degree possession of child pornography.
In the press release, Taylor said Hedley was arrested following an investigation that found that Hedley was allegedly sending child pornography via the internet.
The investigation led to the execution of a search warrant at Hedley's home at 3900 Bayshore Road, in the North Cape May section of the township by members of the Prosecutor's Office Special Victims Unit and High Tech Crimes Unit, as well as Detectives from the Township Police Department.
During the search of Hedley's home, several computers were seized. Hedley was charged and then released on his own recognizance. Additional charges are pending further analysis of Hedley's computers.


text:
Despite Google Aquisition, Zagat Still Feels Like it's Stuck in the Stone Age
Oh, Zagat. I was really hoping this new Google acquisition would update what's become a rather stale form of restaurant evaluation. Last year I published a blog post that listed their five most popular restaurants and noted these establishments have sat on top of Zagat's polls for years.
This year's list?
Exactly the same....
Abacus Fearing's Al Biernat's Stephan Pyles Del Frisco's
While all of these restaurants are great places to eat, the list is as one-dimensional as it is stagnant. The DFW area offers so much more than high-end steak houses with triple-digit checks. Hopefully Zagat's lists will eventually reflect that.
Get the Food & Drink Newsletter
Our weekly guide to Dallas dining includes food news and reviews, as well as dining events and interviews with chefs and restaurant owners.
Recommended for You
Powered by SailThru
Popular Stories
Sponsor Content


text:
A Vancouver space and satellite technology developer is blastingthe federal government for foot-dragging on plans for new satellites that are supposed to defend Canada's sovereignty in the Arctic.
MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd.'s criticism of the Conservative government comes four years after Ottawa surprised investors by blocking the company from selling its space technology division to Minneapolis-based Alliant Techsystems Inc., saying the unit was of strategic interest to Canada.
Now, the company says scientists and engineers are leaving the company because the Harper government has failed to live up to commitments to adequately fund space robotics and to meet deadlines in its key Radarsat Constellation project, which aims to launch at least three new satellites starting around 2016. The goal is to dramatically improve surveillance of Canadian territory and its border regions, including defending the country's sovereignty in the thinly populated North.
But MDA chief executive officer Dan Friedmann warns a vital industrial capacity is at risk in Canada as his staff are forced to leave the country for work. He says the level of federal space-robotics funding no longer amounts to "serious numbers" necessary to keep smart people working in Canada on the file.
The company's Brampton, Ont., operation has already lost about 100 employees and expects to lose another 50 in 2012 as a result of the cuts to funding in the space-robotics area. MDA could also lose approximately 100 employees in its Richmond, B.C., and Montreal operations if the Radarsat Constellation project doesn't proceed.
Mr. Friedmann said he has no choice but to notify his satellite division staff of job cuts. "It's a measure we have had to take, because unfortunately we've already seen this movie on robotics."
Industry Minister Christian Paradis' department said Thursday it has not given up on the Radarsat Constellation project, despite the fact it has missed the target for awarding the satellite construction contract by five months.
"We remain committed to the Radarsat project," Industry Canada spokeswoman Andrea Matte said. She did not provide any details on when Ottawa might proceed beyond the design phase.
The Harper government has thrown many new spending plans into a deep freeze as it seeks to cut $5.2-billion from annual expenditures in order to balance the budget faster.
The Canadian Space Agency is squeezing its budget to cut $7.9-million from the 2012-13 fiscal year and $24.7-million from 2013-2014. It's trying to carve out what it calls "ongoing savings" of $29.5-million by 2014-15.
Mr. Friedmann said he presumed when the Tories blocked the sale in 2008 it was going to represent a new era for government support of key technologies at MDA. "It was good news. I thought they recognized at the time it was strategic."
He said Ottawa awarded the company the contract to design the next-generation Radarsat satellites shortly after it blocked that sale in 2008 – and ramped up space-robotics funding during the recession.
But starting in 2011 he noticed the "door starting to shut," when it became clear Ottawa wasn't going to continue to spend at the same pace on robotics.
Then, this January, Ottawa missed what MDA understood to be the target date for awarding the contract to build the next-generation satellites.
Mr. Friedmann said he's been trying for several months to arrange a meeting with Stephen Harper but has had no luck in securing one with the Prime Minister's Office. "I've been told that's the only place we can get this thing unstuck."
"In the case of [space]robotics and synthetic aperture radar, those technologies are considered strategic by all countries including Canada," he said.
"I cannot work in those areas unless my own government is involved."
Mr. Friedmann said the delayed building contract means the 2016 launch of the first satellite is also delayed now by five months.
"There's a day-for-day slip," he said, adding that things could worsen as satellite division staff are let go.
"Once you get past June it's going to be a longer [delay]… because you start losing too many people and it gets harder to put it back together."
Mr. Friedmann said the staff he's assembled to build and design satellites have very specialized talents – skills that will be in demand abroad.
"There are many countries around the world that are thinking of doing parallel programs, especially if we don't move ahead and there's no other work [here]for most of these people," he said.
He blames Mr. Paradis' department.
"I think the Prime Minister is quite committed. I just don't understand why his people in Industry Canada can't execute."Report Typo/Error
Follow @stevenchaseon Twitter:
- MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd$67.32-1.18(-1.72%)
- Updated August 18 4:00 PM EDT. Delayed by at least 15 minutes.


text:
the grounds: First. That said cause is not one cognizable before the Gnited Stl'tes court. Second. That the petition for transfer, as well as the entire record in said case, shows that it is not one arising under the constitution or laws of the united States. 'l'hird. That neither from said petition nor record does it sufIiciently appear that there is any disputed construction of any statutes or constitutional provision of the united States involved, or that the decision of the case depends upon the construction of any law or constitutional provision. Fourth. That from said petition it is man· ifest that I"{tid suit is not one arising under the constitution of the United States. This motion, on the 10th day of said month of February, was overruled. Afterwards, a general replication was filed, and testimony taken, upon which, together with the pleading and exhibits, the court, on the 1st day of April, 1895, rendered a decree adverse to the complainant, and dismissed its bill, with costs. From this decision an appeal has taken to this court. The first assigned error is that the drcuit court did not have jurisdiction to try and determine said cause. According to the decisions of the supreme court in Tennessee v. Union & Planters' Bank, 152 U. S. 454, 14 Sup. Ct. 654; Chappell v. ·Waterworth, 155 U. S. 102, 15 Sup. Ct. 34; Land Co. v. Brown, 155 U. S. 488, 15 Sup. Ct. 357; and Railway CQ. v. Skottowe (recently decided, but not yet officially reported) 16 Sup. Ct. 869,-a case cannot be removed from a state court to the circuit court of the United States as one arising under the constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, unless that fact appears by the plaintiff's statement of his own claim; and, if it does not so appear, the want cannot be supplied by any statement in the petition for removal, or in the subsequent pleadings. Under these repeated decisions, we are constrained to hold that this instant case was improperly removed to the circuit eourt. A eritical examination of the complainant's bill fails to show us any case necessarily arising under the eonstitution or laws of the United States. The deeree of the circuit eourt is reversed, and the eause is remanded to the circuit court with instructions to that eourt to remand the same to the state eourt from which it was originally removed.
BELL et al. v. KRUEGEL et al. (CirCUit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 5, 18fJ6.) No. 450.
MORTGAGE-FAILURE OF CO::<fSIDEHATION.
One K. arranged, through )1., for a loan of 8:;,000 from B. & Co., to be secured by mortgage on certain land, in the improvement of which the money was to be used. He delivered his not\e and mortgage, and received $1,900; the remaining by agreement with M., being retained by the latter, to be paid out as the improvements were made. Before K. received any of it, M. failed and made an assignment. K. then filed his bill against B. & Co., M., and the latter's assignee, to set aside the mortgage. E. & Co. alleged that )1. had no authority to loan their money on the terms alleged, and that they knew nothing of the agreement for the retention of the $3,100. Held, that whether or not B. & Go. ratified this agreement, as
K. had received $1,900, and no more, he was entitled to a decree allowing him a credit of $3,100 on his note and mortgage, such note and mortgage to be delivered to B. & 00., reserving to them the right to recover fromM. the $3,100, either as held by them for B. & Co., or as misappropriated without their authority.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of 'l'exas.
On July 28, 1893, Herman Kruegel, appellee, instituted this suit in the distric't court of Dallas county, 'rex., against C. S. Bell & Co., & Bolanz, and E.T. Loughborough, alleging that C. S. Bell & Co., who resided in Ohio, acting through Murphy & Bolanz as their agents, bad plior to June 13, 1893. ngreed to lend him $5,000 upon the security of certain real estate; that he bad executed his note for said sum payable to C. S. Bell & Co., three years atter date, with interest at 8 per cent. pel' annum, payable semiannually, aud had also executed a mortgage or tru.st deed in which J. P. Murphy was named as trustee to secure said note; that these instruments bad by him been deliYered to Murphy & Bolanz on June 13, 1893, the day of their date; that the llUl'pOSe of the loan was to improve the property on which the deed of trust rested; that he (Kruegel) received $1,900 of the money, and $3,100 thereof was retained by Murphy & Bolanz, to be paid out as the improvements were made; that on July 22, 1893, before the improvements were completed, Murphy & Bolanz, having appropriated to their own use the $3,100, had become insolvent, and made a general a,ssignment to ]J. T. Loughborough; that said Loughborough or Murphy & Bolanz had possession of said instruments, and were about to send them to C. S. Bell & Co., in Ohio. He prayed for an injunction restraining the sending of the note to C. S. Bell & Co.; that the nbte, coupons, and trust deed be eanceled; and that a receiver be appointed to hold them pending the suit. Kruegel alleged that he was "ready, willing, and anxious to repay to C. S. Bell & Co. the said sum of $1,900 received by him." C. S. BPlI tiled formal answer in the case on August 15, 1893, and, on same day, filed petition and bond for removal, which was granted on August 18, 18\J3. 'i'ranscript was filed in the circuit court, put on the equity docket, and an order to replead made. The appellee Kruegel then filed a bill of complaint at great length, but alleging substantially as in his original petition, and, in addition, claiming damages for breach of contract on the part of C. S. Bell & Co., in failing to furnish him the money contracted for, as follows: $400, paid Murphy & Bolanz, commission for securing the loan for him; $700, expended for labor and materials in making improvements on the lot; loss of rents, at rate of $130 per month, for each month since September 15, 1893, which he alleged the lot, if improved, would have yielded; and a balance of $918.60 out of the $1,000 received by him from C. S. Bell & Co., which he had on deposit with Murphy & Bolanz when they failed. The prayer was for the cancellation of the note, coupons, and deed of trust, for damages as above set out, and that the amount received by Kruegel be ascertained, and that they have a reasonable time to repay it, that the injunction be perpetuated, and for general relief. C. S. Bell & Co. answered under oath, setting up that they had the sum of $5,000 on deposit with Murphy & Bolanz, who were bankers, prior to .Tune 13, 1893; that Kruegel employed Murphy & Bolanz to negotiate his note secured by deed of trust; that they had authorized Murphy & Bolanz to loan the $5,000 on improved real-estate security; that :Murphy & Bolanz. acting as agent for both Kruegel and C. S. Bell and C. E. Bell (composing the firm of C. S. Bell & Co.), and Krnegel, arranged the loan; that Kruegel made the note and deed of trust, and delivered same to Murphy & Bolanz for C. S. Bell & Co., and the $5,000 was then piaced to Kruegel's account with & Bolanz, and was charged against C. S. Bell & Co. on their account with Murphy & Bolanz; that C. S. Bell & Co. had no knowledge of any agreement between Kruegel and Murphy & Bolanz by which Murphy & Bolanz were to retain in their bank any. of the money, and had not authorized Murphy & Bolanz to make such agreement; that the agreement between Kruegei and Murphy & Bolanz regarding the retention by them of $3,100 was secretly and fraudulently made by Krllcgel and themselves for the benefit of Kruegel, as C. S. Bell &; Co. would not have made the loan on such terms. They deny that they knew
Murphy & Bolanz werp, chargIng the commissIons or $400, or that they knew before July 25, 1893, that Murphy & Bolanz were Insolvent, but, on the contrary, aver they believed them to be solvent and safe brokers, which was also the opinion prevailing at the time in Dallas, Tex. The hill was taken as confessed against J. P. Murphy and Chas. F. Bolanz, comprising the firm at Murphy & BoIanz, on October 1, 1894. Rf'plication was filed October 1, 1894. A hearing was had on July 13, 1895, and a tinal decree was rendered In favor of appellee; directing the cancellation of the note and deed of trust in case Kruegel should pay $581.40, with 6 per cent. interest from June 13, 1893,. at any time before June 13, 1896; dIrecting, in event of such payment, that J. P. Murphy, trustee, reconvey the property to Kruegel; that, in case the sum adjudged should not be paid within the time limited, C. S. Bell & Co. should be at liberty to foreclose for the amount adjudged, with six per cent. inter0i!8t; that until June 17, 1896, aU parties be enjoined from indorsing, assigning, or negotiating the note and deed of trust; that after June 17, 1896, in the event payment of $581.40, with interest, had not been made, the appellants should be enjoIned "from Indorsing, assigning, or negotiating said note and deed of trust only to the extent of $4,41S.UO"; and that defendants and plaintiffs each pay one-half the costs. From this decree, C. S. and C. E. Bell appeal.
J. 11-1. McCormick and 'Vendell Spence, for appellants. M. M. Parks, for appellees. . Before PARDEE and McCORM;ICK, Circuit Judges, and SPEER, District Judge. PARDEE, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts). The evidence in the case is not conflicting, and shows the facts to be substantially as set for1:h in the pleadings. The legal conclusion from the contract between Murphy & Bolanz and Kruegel is that & Bolanz held the $3,100 as a depositary for both Bell & Co. and Kruegel, with the understanding that, if Kruegel made the improve· ments upon the property mortgaged as he had agreed to do, then he was to receive the and owe the full amount of the note; if he did not make the improvements, then the money was to be held for the security of Bell & Co., and to be applied to reduce the note pro tanto. The improvements that Kruegel agreed to make were not made, and probably because of the failure of Murphy &. Bolanz, resulting in this: that, of the $5,000 loan, Kruegel only received the sum of $1,900. In the view we take of the case, it is not material to determine whether Bell & Co. knew of and ratified the arrangement. If they difl know of it, and ratified it, then thej' can only recover from Kruegel the sum of $1,900, actually received by him. If they did not know of it, and the transaction in their behalf, on the part of Murphy & Bolanz, was unauthorized, then Murphy & Bolanz made an unauthorized appropriation of Bell & CO.'s money to the extent of $5,000; and as $1,900 of the sum went into Kruegel's hands, and is represented in the note and mortgage, a trust in favor of Bell & Co. resulted for that amount. There is no evidence showing Bell & Co. in any wise parties to, or bound by, the arrangement between Murphy & Bolanz and Kruegel by which part of the $1,900 was left on deposit with Murphy & Bolanz, to be drawn as Kruegel might go forward with the improvements. Krue· gel admits judicially, and testifies in the case, that he received this $1,900; that it was placed to his credit on the books of Murphy & Bolanz, and drawn against by him as he saw fit, until the failure of
Murphy & Bolanz. Under these facts proved and judicially admitted, we are of opinion that Kruegel is liable for the sum of $1,900, with stipulated interest, and that equity will be done in the premises by allowing Kruegel a credit on the note at the date of execution of the sum of $8,100; reducing the coupons for interest pro rata; giving to Bell & Co. the possession of the note and coupons tims credited and reduced; and reserving to them the right to recover from Murphy & Bolanz the said sum of $8,100; and reserving to Kruegel the right to recover from Murphy & Bolanz such part of the $1,900 deposited with them as had not been drawn out at the time of the Murphy & Bolanz failure. T'he following decree should be entered in the case: The court finding that the consideration of the note for $5,000, dated June 18, 1893, payable to the order of O. S. Bell & 00., at the office of Murphy & Bolanz, in Dallas, Tex., three years after the date thereof, has failed to the extent of $3,100, and that the said deed of trust is, in equity, a security or lien for the sum of $1,900 only, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that upon plaintiff Kruegel's paying to O. S. Bell & 00. the sum of $1,900, with 8 per cent. interest thereon from June 13, 1893, on or before the date of the maturity of said note, to wit, June 13, 1896, at the office of McCormick & Spence, in the city of Dallas, Tex., the defendants, C. S. Bell, C. E. Bell, J. P. Murphy, Oharles F. Bolanz, and E. T. Loughborough do deliver up to the plaintiff Kruegel, to be canceled, the said note, coupons, and deed of trust, as fully paid and satisfied; and that the said J. P. Murphy do reconvey unto the said plaintiff KruegeI, within five days after such payment, the property covered by the said deed of trust, free and clear of all incumbrance thereon by reason of such deed; and, in case the plaintiff shall not pay unto the said O. S. Bell & 00. said sum of $1,900, with interest as aforesaid, within the time aforesaid, the said J. P. Murphy and Oharles F. Bolanz shall within a delay of five days from the 13th of June, 1896, indorse a credit upon the said note, of date June 13, 1893, in the sum of $3,100, and shall indorse a credit on each one of the six coupons given for payment of interest on such note the sum of $124, and shall then deliveT said note and coupons to said O. S. Bell & 00. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the injunction formerly granted in this case be continued so far as to enjoin and restrain the defendants from indorsing, assigning, or negotiating said notes, coupons, and deed of trust until after June 13, 1896, and if said plaintiff shall pay the said sum of $1,900, with interest, as aforesaid, unto the said O. SBell & 00., on or before that date as hereinbefore provided, the defendants are perpetually restrained from assigning, indorsing, or negotiating the same. But if said plaintiff Kruegel shall fail to pay said sum of $1,900, with interest, as aforesaid, on or before June 13, 1896, as herein provided, then the defendants O. S. Bell and O. E. Bell are restrained from indorsing, assigning, or negotiating said note and deed of trust, except the same is charged with the credit of $3,100, as herein prOVided; otherwise than as herein provided, the injunction referred to is dissolved. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff Kruegel and the defendants Bell & Co. each
pay one-half of the costs incurred in this cause. The decre appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to enter a decree in conformity with the views herein expressed.
SOPl'HERN PAC. R. CO. v. GROECI{ et al. (Circuit Court, S. D. California. May 18, 1896.)
No. 347.
A grant of land was made to a railroad company, by act of congress, in July, 186G. In .January, 18H7, the company located the general route of its road, and filed the map thereof, but did nothing towards definitely locating its road until 1888, when it constructed the road, and did not file the map of the definite location until April, 1889. In the meantime, in .September, 1885, one G. settled on certain lands within tile mdemnity limits of the grant, and was allowed by the officials of the land office to file his declaratory statement therefor, at that time, and to enter and pay for the land in June, 1886, receiving a patent therefor in April, 1890. The railroad company made no attempt to select such land until December, 1891, and waited until February, 1892, before bringing suit against G. to cancel his patent and recover the land. Held that, in the absence of excuse for such delay, the railroad company was guilty of such laches as to bar it from relief in equity against G.'s adverse claim, notwithstanding the land, at the time G. settled on it, was withdrawn from settlement.
Wm. Singer, Jr., and W. F. Herrin, for complainant. W. B. Wallace and Joseph H. Call, for defendants. ROSS, Circuit Judge. To the original bill in this case a demurrer was sustained, upon the ground that the bill showed upon its face such laches on the part of the complainant as precluded it from the recovery sought. Railroad Co. v. Groeck, 68 Fed. 609617. Leave was, however, given the complainant to amend its bill, and accordingly it filed an amended bill, to which the respondents interposed a plea, which the complainant caused to be set down for argument, and which has been argued and is now for disposition. For the purpose of disposing of the plea, the court must assume, without proof on either side, the facts to be as set out in the bill, where not controverted by the plea, and, where so controverted, or inconsistent, to accept as true the contradictory and inconsistent allegations of the plea, together with such additional facts as are therein set out. U. S. v. California & O. Land Co., 148 U. S. 31-39, 13 Sup. Ct. 458; Farley v. Kittson, 120 U. S. 304314, 7 Sup. Ct. 534; Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 14 Pet. 253258. The case as now presented is not, in my opinion, as strong for the complainant as when it was last under consideration. As now presented, it shows that, notwithstanding the grant to the complainant, under which it claims the piece of land in controversy, was made by congress July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292), and that the complainant, on or before the 3d day of January, 1867, located the general route of the road it was authorized to build by the act
making the grant, and filed with the secretary of the interior a map, on that day, showing the general route of the road as located, which map was accepted by the secretary, and on the same day transmitted by him to the commissioner of the general land office, to be filed in that office, which was done on the same day, yet the complainant did nothing towards definitely locating that portion of its road opposite the land in controversy prior to the year 1888, and never attempted to select the land in controversy until December 31, 1891, for which long delay the bill, as amended, affords no excuse. It appears, from the bill, as amended, that the piece of land in controversy, which is within the indemnity limits of the grant, is opposite that section of the complainant's road extending from Huron westerly to Alcalde, and that that portion of the road was not constructed until the yMr 1888, and that the complainant never filed a plat in the general land office showing the definite location of. that portion oUts road until April 2, 1889, years after the defendant Groeck went upon the land, claiming the right of settlement, and had been allowed by the officers of the land department to enter and pay for it, and but little more 'Chan one,year before the government issued to him its patent there· for. True,the land was not, at the time, subject to Groeck's settlement, for the reaSOn that it then stood withdrawn from such settlement or sale for the benefit of the complainant; but the complainant was then sleeping upon its rights, and continued to sleep upon them until February 11, 1892, when it commenced this suit. The question, therefore, remains whether the facts alleged do not disclose such laches on the part of the complainant as makes it proper for a court of equity to withhold its aid. A decree in favor would be, in effect, to hold that the complainant, without any reason or excuse therefor being shown, was entitled to tie the hands of the government, the government being passive, and therefore consenting, and exclude from all the odd sections within what might prove to be the indemnity limits of its grant all persons who might seek a settlement thereon, for a period extending from the date of its grant, July 27, 1866, until the year 1888, without In any way indicating the definite location of its road,-a period of more than 21 years; and that it could continue to wait until April 2, 1889, before filing in the office of the commissioner of the general land office a map showing its definite location, and until December 31, 1891, before attempting to exercise its right of selection, and until February 11, 1892, before instituting suit to establish its claim to a piece of land falling within the indemnity limits of its gl'ant, as fixed by the final and defirlite location of its road, as against one who settled upon it on the 2d day of September, 1885, and for which he was allowed by the officers of the local land office to file his declaratory statement on September 7, 1885, and which he was allowed by the officers of the land department to enter and pay for June 7, 1886, and for which the govermnent issued to him its patent April 11, 1890. The bill, as amended, shows that the section of the complainant's road opposite the land in controversy wasconstrncted prior to the
filing in the general land office of a map showing its definite location, but, so far as appears, nothing whatever was done by the complainant tending to indicate the definite location of that section of the road until the year 1888, during which year it was constructed. The bill, as amended, does not show that this long delay of the complainant in indicating the definite location of that part of its road opposite the land in controversy was in any respect caused by any failure or neglect on the part of the government or of any of its officers, nor does it show any excuse for waiting, after the construction of that portion of its road in 1888, until December 31, 1891, before making any attempt to select the piece of land in controversy, nor for waiting until February 11, 1892, before bringing this suit. The fact, as made to appear by the pleadings now before the court, that the complainant actually constructed its road before filing with the commissioner of the general land office a map showing its definite location, would seem to indicate quite clearly that the complainant treated the map of its general route there filed on the 3d day of January, 1867, as its map of definite location. At all events, it was the business of the complainant to fix definitely the location of its road, and to indicate that line by a map filed in the general land office. Neither the government nor any other company or individual could do so for the complainant. The delay and neglect in that regard was the delay and neglect of the complainant, and of nobody else. In this aspect of the case, it is unimportant that l when Groeck settled upon the land, on September 2,1885, claiming the right to pre-empt it, the land was not legally open to settlement, because withdrawn from such settlement or sale for the benefit of the complainant company. 'l'he fact remains that Groeck did enter upon it under an adverse claim to the complainant, and that his claim was recognized by the officers of the land department of the government, and that, notwithstanding those facts, the complainant continued to Ideep upon its rights for more than six and a half years before appealing to the court for relief,-a period considerably longer than that prescribed by the statute of California for the bringing of an action for the recovery of real property. Code Civ. Proc. Cal. §§ 318, 319, 343, 738. It is true that the laches of which the complainant was guilty prior to Groeck's settlement is no concern of his, and that, if the government was content, no third party has the right to complain; but certainly he is entitled to avail himself of such laches as occurred subsequent to the commencement of his adverse claim,-a claim which existed uncontested for more than six and a half years. While the statutes of limitations applicable to actions at law do not apply to suits in equity, courts of equity are governed by the analogy of such statutes. Norris v. Haggin, 136 U. S. 10 Sup. Ct. 942. "A court of equity," said Lord Camden, "has always refused its aid to stale demands, where the party slept upon his rights, and acquiesced for a great length of time. Nothing can call forth this court into activity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence. Where these are wanting, the court is pas-
sive, and does nothing. Laches and neglect are always discountenanced; and therefore, from the beginning of this jurisdiction, there was always a limitation to suits in this court." This doctrine has been repeatedly recognized and acted on by the supreme court. Curtner v. U. S.,149 U. S. 676, 13 Sup. Ct. 985, 1041; Speidel v. Henrici, 120 U. S. 377, 7 Sup. Ct. 610, and cases there cited. An order will be entered sustaining the plea, with leave to the complainant, if it shall be so advised, to reply to the plea, and take issue in respect to the matters of fact alleged, within 20 days from this date.
SOUTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. SMI'rH et al. (CircUit Court, S. D. California. No. 426.
RAILROAD LAND GRANTS-INDE}[NITy-LIMITS OF SEI.ECTION.
May 18, 1896.)
A railroad company, to which a grant has been made by congress ot alternate sections of public land, on each side of its road, with the right to select other lands, within a limited distance beyond such alternate sections, in lieu of lands sold or otherwise disposed of by the government. cannot select indemnit;y lands on one side of its road, to make good losses sustained on the other side. U. S. v. Burlington & 1'1. R. R. Co., 98 U. S. 334, followed.
Wm. Singer, Jr., and W. F. Herrin, for complainant. N. Blackstock, Oeo. J. Dennis, and Joseph H. Call, for defendants. ROSS, Circuit Judge. The tracts of land in controversy in this suit having been patented to the defendant Smith under the pre-emption laws of the United States, and by him afterwards conveyed to the defendant Wolff, the complainant, claiming to be entitled to them by virtue of a congressional grant, brought this suit to obtain a decree that the title conveyed by the patent is held in trust for it, to compel the conveyance thereof to the complainant, and to enjoin the defendants from asserting any title to the lands. The grant under which the complainant claims is that of March 3, 1871, entitled "An act to incorporate the Texas Pacific Railroad Company, and to aid in the construction of its road, and for other purposes" (16 Stat. p. 573), by which the complainant was authorized to construct a line of railroad from a point at or near Tehachipi Pass, by way of Los Angeles, to the Texas Pacific Railroad at or near the Colorado river, with the same right.;,, grants, and privileges, and subject to the same limitations, restrictions, and conditions, as were granted to the complainant by the preceding act of July 27, 1866, entitled "An act granting lands to aid in the construction of a railroad and telegraph line from the states of Missouri and Arkansas to the Pacific coast" (14 Stat. p. 292). The terms of the grant under which the complainant claims are, therefore, to be found in the act of July 27, 1866. So far as applicable to the present case, it was a grant of every alternate section of public land, not mineral, designated by odd numbers, to the amount of 10 alternate sections per mile on each side of the road the complainant was authorized to build, to which the
United States should have full title, not reserved, sold, granted, or otherwise appropriated, and free from pre-emption or other claims or rights at the time such route should be designated by a plat thereof filed in the office of the commissioner of the general land office; and where, prior to that time, any of the sections or parts of sections should be granted, sold, reserved, occupied by homestead settlers, or pre-empted or otherwise di"posed of, the act provided that other lands should "be selected by said company in lieu thereof, under the direction of the secretary of the interior, in alternate sections, designated by odd numbers, not more than ten miles beyond the limits of said alternate sections, and not including reserved numbers." The bill as amended, to which the defendants interposed a plea, which plea the complainant caused to be set down for argument, and which has been argued and submitted to the court for decision, comalleges, among other things, that, on or before April 3, plainant fixed the general route of the entire line of railroad which it was authorized by the act of March 3, 1871, to construct, and that, on April 3, 1871, the line of the road was designated on a plat thereof, filed on that day in the office of the commissioner of the general land office; that the said general route, plat, and designation of the line were duly approved and accepted by the commissioner of the general land otl1ce and by the secretary of the interior, and, on April 21, 1871, the commissioner of the general land office, by direction of the secretary of the interior, dated April 19, 1871, withdrew the odd-numbered sections of land, within 30 miles of the railroad line shown upon the said plat, from sale or location, pre-emption, or homestead entry, which order of withdrawal has ever since continued in force and effect, except in so far as, if at all, the same may have been affected by an order of the secretary of the interior, dated August 15, 1H87, directing the restoration of all land withdrawn and held for indemnity purposes under the grant to the complainant. The bill, as amended, further alleges that, on May 16, 1871, complainant accepted the terms, conditions, and impositions of the act of March 3, 1871, and thereafter constructed and fully equipped the entire railroad provided for in the act in five several sections, along the route designated upon the plat filed April 3, 1871, and that, after the completion of the construction ana equipment of the said sections, respectively, commissioners were duly appointed by the president to examine the same, who did so, and reported to the president the completion and equipment of the road in accordance with the requirements of the act, which report was accepted and approved by the secretary of the interior and by the president; that the section of the road opposite which the land in controversy is situated extends from San Fernando to Mojave, in respect to which section the report of the commissioners was made February 17, 1877, and was approved by the president March 2, 1877. The bill, as amended, further alleges that, on February 17, 1877, the complainant filed with the secretary of the interior a map of that portion of its road showing the definite location and construction thereof, which map was approved by the secretary of the interior March 6, 1877. The bill, as amended, also describes the
tracts of land lost to it, in lieu of which it claims the lands in· controversy, and alleges that the lands so lost are situated on the north side of its road as definitely located and constructed, and within 20 miles of that portion of the road, as constructed, extending from Spadra to San Gorgonio, and that the lands so lost to complainant were granted, as part of the Rancho Muscupiabe, prior to the time when the line of the complainant's railroad was designated by a plat thereof filed in the office of the commissioner of the general land office; that the tracts of land in controversy, which are specifically described in the bill as amended, are parts of an odd-numbered section situated on the south side of the complainant's road as definitely located and constructed, and distant more than 20 miles from, but lying within 30 miles of, that section of the road which extends from San Fernando to Mojave, which tracts were, at the time of the pal".,'lage of the act of March 3, 1871, vacant and unappropriated public lands of the United States, not mineral, to which the United States had full title, not reserved, sold, granted, or otherwise appropriated, and free from pre-emption or other claims or rights, and have ever since so remained, excepting, only, as they have been affected by the laws of congress and the acts of the parties in the amended bill mentioned. The bill, as amended, further alleges that, on October 3, 1887, complainant filed its indemnity list No. 25. in the land office of the United States 3t Los within which district the lands in controversy are situated, describing the tracts in controversy as selected by the complainant in lieu of the aforesaid lands lost to complainant; that the indemnity list of the complainant was in the form, and accompanied by the certificates, affidavits, and fees, required by law and the rules and regulations pl'escribed by the secretary of the interior and the commissioner of the general land office; that, by the filing of the list, with the accompanying papers, complainant did, on October 3, 1887, duly select, under the direction of the secretary of the interior, the tracts in controversy, by virtue of the grant contained in the act of March 3, 1871; and that, at the time of such selection, the complainant had not, nor has it yet, selected or received lands to the extent or amount earned and acquired by it by virtue of the granting act. The plea denies that the map filed by the complainant in the department of the interior in the year 1871 was anything more than a map of the general route of the road it proposed to build under the authority of the act of March 3, 1871. It denies that the lands described in the bill as amended are situated within 30 miles of the line of the general route designated upon the map filed by the complainant in the department of the interior, and alleges that the said lands are situated more than 30 miles from that line. It alleges that on or about the - - - day of August, 1887, the secretary of the interior made and entered in his records an order revoking and annulling all orders previously made reserving lands within the indemnity limits of every grant made to the complainant railroad company, and restoring them to the public domain, except so far as they had theretofore been lawfully selected by complain-
l111t. The plea further alleges that, from March 3, 1871, to October B, 1887, the complainant did not select, or apply to select, the lands involved in this suit as indemnity lands, under the direction of the secretary of the interior or otherwise; and. the defendants deny that the secretary of the interior approved the complainant's application to select the lands in controversy, and allege that he rejected the same. The plea further alleges that, on the 7th day of December, 1887, the defendant Smith settled upon the lands in controversy, and, on the same day, filed his declaratory statement in the United States land office therefor, and that, on May 2, 1890, he applied to the register and receiver of the local land office of the district where the lands are situated to make final proof under the pre-emption laws and the regulations of the interior department, and that, in pursuance thereof, on June 2, 1890, he made final proof showing that he had complied with all the requirements of the pre-emption laws, and thereupon he paid to the United States the purchase price for the lands in controversy and received from the register and receiver of the local land office a final certificate for those lands in due form of law, and on November 3, 1891, a patent. was issued by the United States to Smith therefor. From the facts alleged, it appears that the lands in controversy are not within 30 miles of the general route of the road as located by the complainant, and as indicated on the map filed by it in the office of the commissioner of the general land office. They were not, therefore, withdrawn from pre-emption or sale, for the benefit of the complainant, either by the order of the secretary of the interior or by operation· of the granting act itself. Nevertheless, the lands in controversy are within 30 miles of, but more than '20 miles and constructed, and, if vacant from, the road as definitely and unappropriated, were'subject to be taken as authorized by the law, to make good losses sustained by the complainant within the primary limits of its grant. Complainant attempted to select these lands, which are situated on the south side of its road, on October 3, 1887, in lieu of lands situated on the north side thereof within the primary limits of the grant, and which were lost to complainant, by including them in a list filed on that day in the proper local land office, in the form and accompanied by the certificates, affidavits, and fees required by law. This was prior to any attempt at settlement on, or entry of, the lands by the defendant Smith; his settlement, which was the basis of tbepatent subsequently issued to him, having been made December 7, 1887. Complainant commenced the present suit March 10, 1892, but little more than four years after the inauguration of the adverse claim of the defendants. The lands in controversy being within the indemnity limits of the complainant's grant, and being, at the time of the complainant's attempted selection of them, vacant and unappropriated, to which the United States had full title, .and not falling within any of the exceptions to the grant, and the complainant having done all in its power to select them by filing in the proper office its claim to them in due form, accompanied by the affidavits and certificates re-
quired by law, and paying the proper fees, I think it clear that it is entitled to maintain the present bill, unless it be, as contended on the part of the defendants, that indemnity lands on one side of the road cannot be selected to make good losses sustained by the complainant on the other side. That they cannot is, I think, in effect, held by the supreme court in the case of U. S. v. Burlington & M. R. R. Co., 98 U. S. 334-342. On the authority of that case, a decree will be entered sustaining the plea, and dismissing the bill, as amended, at complainant's cost.
HART v. BI.BJH et al. (Circuit Court, E. D. Louisiana. May 30, lSB6.)
One.J. H. filed his bill against H., alleging that his four notes for each, together with certain negotiable bonds as security, had been delivered by his' agent S. H., to B., without consideration, but, though B. had acknowledged the discharge of all obligations of J. B., he refused to surrender the notes and bonds, or to disclose their Whereabouts, and thereupon prayed for a decree a warding him possession thereof. B., in his answer, averred that the bonds were in fact the property of one M. H.; that be, as the broker of said M. B., had become the purchaser of a franchise from the City of N. 0.; that, at the request of M. H., he bad falsely sworn, in legal proceedings instituted In connection with the sale of the franchise, that he was himself the bona fide owner of the franchise; that he had repeated such false testimony before the grand jury, in or<ler to protect M. H. from threatened proceedings for corrupt dealings with the authorities of the of N. 0.; that the notes and bonds had been furnished to him by S. H., the agent of complainant, in order to corroborate such false testimony, by showing apparent proceeds of a sale of the franchise; and that complainant had knowledge, through his agent, of all these corrupt and immoral transactions. M. H., having been made a party, disclaimed all ownership of or interest in the bonds. The cause set down on bill and answers, held, that the question of ownership of the bonds was settled in complainant's favor by the disclaimer of 1\1. 11.· and that, as it could not be presumed and was not alleged that the purpose and scope of S. H.'s agency for complainant were unlawful or authorized immoral acts, complainant was not to be charged with the knowledge acquired by his agent while in illegal and criminal transactions. and accordingly, not being in pari delicto with defendant, was entitled to the decree sought for the surrender of the bonds.
Rogers & Dodds, for complainant. Lazarus, Moore & Luce, for defendants. Before PARDEE" Circuit Judge, and PARLANGE, District Judge. PER CURIAM. The complainant, Judah Hart, a citizen and resident of the city and state of New York, brought his bill against the defendant Renry Bier and the firm of Lazarus, Moore & Luce, attorneys, and therein alleged that on or about the 22d day of November, 1893, he was the owner of 124 first mortgage bonds of the Municipal Ice Company, of the face value of $1,000 each; that, subsequent to said date, the complainant executed and delivered, through his agent, Samuel J. Hart, to him (Bier) his (complainant's) four certain promissory notes, of the sum of $25,000 each, due and


text:
You will get-100% FREE Music and Audio uploads with no time limits
Unlimited Streaming of Music and Audio
Store an Unlimited amount of Music and Audio to your account
Download your favorite Music and Audio for free!
Create your own customized profile
Experience YourListen.com completely ad free for only $1.99 a month. Upgrade your account today!
Share this audio on Facebook and get a FREE Premium account with YourListen.com
Or go Premium without Sharing for only $4 per month
This music and or audio is not accessible due to copyright violations ."REFRENCES TO *THE VIDEO* (Pheels a lot o ..." has been removed due to a copyright notification. Keep exploring! You can find more similar and music and audio here -
2009 - Katherine and Eden phan song high pitched
REFRENCES TO *THE VIDEO* (Pheels a lot of them like a lot!!)
Licence : All Rights Reserved


text:
Each month, Rated People connects over 50,000 homeowners with quality tradesmen - simply enter your job details in the form above to get started.
We'll match your job to the relevant tradesmen in your area - those interested will pay to see your contact details and call you to quote.
As each tradesman expresses interest in quoting on your job, we'll send you their profile and ratings to help you choose the right one for you.
After the work is complete, return to the site and rate your tradesman based on their quality of work, reliability and value for money.
Driveway pavers
Added 29/05/2017
Tarmac base coat to be laid over compacted hardcore approx 50m2 and quote to top coat approx...
Searching for tradespeople
Added 08/01/2017
I'm looking for a local builder to do some work in my 2-bed holiday cottage (single story farm...
Searching for tradespeople
Heating Engineer
Added 24/06/2016
check and repair central heating
Searching for tradespeople
Added 11/07/2013
Retile one side of cottage roof with composite slate tiles to match front. Customer owns and...
Searching for tradespeople
Managing your job is easier with the Rated People Homes App, download it today.