text:
July 21, 2016
It had been quite the grand European tour for Candace Low. In late June, with a six-week jaunt across the continent wrapping up in Portugal, the biologist and adjunct professor at San Francisco State University visited a remote area of a popular tourist region called the Algarve. The Algarve is full of hotels, but Low was in a coastal region called Aljezur. Much of the area is undeveloped — it's a national park — so Low found a place to stay via Airbnb, which has hundreds of listings in the area, some for as little as $21 a night. She'd already had one less-than-stellar stay in a home rented via Airbnb: In May, early on in her trip, she found a room in a flat in Stockholm, where Low ended up hiding while her host, Ida, engaged in verbal and physical abuse with her teenage daughter while her two other daughters cried and wailed. (Ida also tried to charge her an extra 95 euro for using the fridge.) And her three-night stay in Aljezur's Costa Vicentina — at a work-in-progress casa, with a 4-and-half-star rating — got off to a rough start. After arriving late on the first night, Low and her host, Samantha, never got along. "She did not like me from the moment I arrived and proceeded to make my stay uncomfortable," Low later told Airbnb in an email. Relations were icy, if workable, but on the third night, June 22 — when Samantha organized a party for the other guests, a couple who are Airbnb hosts in Spain, and some volunteer workers at the property — things fell apart. Low says Samantha turned her nose up at the wine she'd brought. Then Samantha told Low — the biologist — that she didn't believe in science. Then she started mocking Low for being from California. Finally, after a few glasses of wine and a joint, and an argument over getting more money in order for Low to use her kitchen, Samantha asked Low to leave — offering her her money back if she did. It was 2 a.m….
Source: http://sfist.com/2016/07/21/what_do_you_do_when_your_airbnb_hos.php
July 21, 2016


text:
What is JotForm?
JotForm is a free online form builder which helps you create online forms without writing a single line of code. No sign-up required.
At JotForm, we want to make sure that you're getting the online form builder help that you need. Our friendly customer support team is available 24/7.
We believe that if one user has a question, there could be more users who may have the same question. This is why many of our support forum threads are public and available to be searched and viewed. If you'd like help immediately, feel free to search for a similar question, or submit your question or concern.
How do I change the widths of text boxes in specific columns of all the matrices in a form without having to target the matrices by their IDs?Asked by District1010 on February 02, 2014 at 03:19 PM
Entry Box widths
Asked by District1010 on February 02, 2014 at 03:14 PMI am working on a Delegate Registration form which uses one of the Widgets. I have added additional columns but they seem too small. Am I able to change the width of the entry boxes on those form items 1-12?Peter
JotForm Support
Hi Peter,
To change the width of the boxes in both columns to the same width add the following rule to the form's injected CSS:
.form-matrix-table td:nth-child(5) .form-textbox,
.form-matrix-table td:last-child .form-textbox {
width: 90px;
(Edit the value of the width to suit)
.form-matrix-table td:nth-child(5) .form-textbox
targets the boxes in the Rotary Title column and
.form-matrix-table td:last-child .form-textbox
targets the boxes in the Phone No. one. So, adjusting the widths separately would require separate rules. For example:
.form-matrix-table td:nth-child(5) .form-textbox {
width: 80px;
.form-matrix-table td:last-child .form-textbox {
width: 100px;
Here's a clone of the form which uses the first solution. (I've disabled the conditions so you can see all of the matrices.)
If you would like clarification on anything, please let us know.
Hi Abajan
Thank you that certainly looks to be the solution. How do I access the injected CSS code on my form?
OK sorted that now many thanks (Preferences / Forms)

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Things Unnecessary is a store located at the Springfield Heights Promenade. It has a lot of merchandise that is unnecessary like the name suggests. The salesmen there are always trying to sell overpriced and outrageous objects to people who can't afford them. Homer bought an Astrolabe from there once.
Shops and Restaurants
|The Android's Dungeon & Baseball Card Shop • The Frying Dutchman • The Gilded Truffle • Herman's Military Antiques • Jake's Unisex Barbershop • Lard Lad Donuts • Luigi's • King Toot's Music Store • Krusty Burger • Kwik-E-Mart • Moe's Tavern • Phineas Q. Butterfat's Ice Cream Parlor • Springfield Grocery Store • Springfield Mall (The Leftorium)


text:
AN EXHIBITION by the Dorchester Art Club at Dorset County Museum generated both interest and sales.
The club's open exhibition proved popular as did the Words and Pictures creative writing programme for youngsters that ran alongside it.
Prize winners from the exhibition included Mary Lucroft, who claimed the Edward Grassby Memorial Cup, and Tony Paul for Most Popular Painting. Tony Paul also won The Herring Award for the Effect of Light and Margaret Tacon claimed the DAC Award for the exhibition committee's favourite picture.
Other winners included Iris McCrow, whose picture of Weymouth Harbour won The Lesley Phillips Trophy for a Dorset Scene, and Mike Jackson, who was awarded The Stella and Trevor Jones Trophy for Contemporary Art.


text:
Outdoor Dining
Papa Charlie's Restaurant and Tavern
The relaxed atmosphere welcomes families and friends for lunch, dinner, a drink, conversation, games and relaxation on the deck overlooking Moose Mountain. Plan a dinner or gathering for your family reunion, wedding party, or rehearsal dinner with us at Papa Charlie's! Mid-June - Labor Day welcomes Acoustic Music on the deck from 6:00 - 9:00.
Moose Mountain Summit Chalet (pictured)
Summit Chalet welcomes hikers, vacationers, sight-seers, leaf peepers, gondola riders and weddings throughout the spring/summer/fall seasons. Open 10 - 5:00 (food and beverage service ends 1 hour prior to closing and at 3:00 on Saturdays).


text:
Chocolate Swirl Sour Cream Coffee Cake
Be the first to review
READY IN: 2hrs
Recipe by Manami
My daughter made this coffee cake for some of us here at the home! Needless to say, we want to know when we will be treated again? Hint, hint.:)
See Discussion:
Ingredients Nutrition
- 1 cup pecans
- 1⁄2 cup firmly packed light brown sugar
- 1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
- 1 1⁄2 ounces godiva dark chocolate, chopped (1 bar)
- 1⁄4 cup cake flour
- 1⁄4 cup unsweetened cocoa powder
- 4 tablespoons unsalted butter
- 2 1⁄2 cups all-purpose flour
- 2 1⁄2 teaspoons baking powder
- 1⁄2 teaspoon baking soda
- 1⁄4 teaspoon salt
- 1 cup unsalted butter, softened (2 sticks)
- 1 1⁄2 cups granulated sugar
- 3 large eggs
- 1 large egg yolk
- 1 1⁄2 teaspoons vanilla extract
- 1 cup sour cream, at room temperature
- confectioners' sugar
Directions See How It's Made
- Place sugar, pecans and cinnamon in food processor.
- Cover and pulse until nuts are coarsely chopped.
- Transfer 3/4 cup of mixture to small bowl and stir in chocolate for filling.
- To remaining mixture in food processor add flour, cocoa powder and butter and pulse until mixture is crumbly for topping.
- Preheat oven to 325°F
- Butter bottom and sides of 9-inch springform pan & dust pan with flour, tapping out excess.
- Sift flour, baking powder, baking soda and salt into medium bowl; whisk to combine and set aside.
- Beat butter at medium-high speed in mixing bowl for 1 minute or until creamy, using electric mixer at medium-high speed.
- Gradually add sugar and beat at high speed until well blended and light, about 2 minutes.
- Add eggs and yolk, one at a time, beating well after each addition and scraping down sides of bowl as necessary.
- Beat in vanilla extract.
- Reduce speed to low and alternately add dry ingredients and sour cream, beginning and ending with dry ingredients and mixing just until combined.
- Scrape half of batter into prepared pan and smooth top.
- Sprinkle with filling.
- Scrape remaining batter over filling and smooth top.
- Sprinkle with topping.
- Bake 65 to 75 minutes or until toothpick inserted into center of cake comes out clean and cake pulls away from edge of pan.
- Let cake cool in pan set on wire rack for 10 minutes.
- Remove side of pan and cool completely.
- Dust cake lightly with confectioners' sugar before serving.


text:
Myself and my wife are visiting Boston for the first time (in fact it's the first time in the USA) from Ireland. Is there anything we "shouldn't miss" while there. Also has anyone stayed in Doubletree Club Boston Bayside? and is it nice ?
hope someone can help
Recent ActivityView all United States activity »
- 1 http://nitroshredadvice.com/primex-testo-max/
- 2 Rail Male Enhancement - Best Natural Male Sexual Enhancement Supplement
- 3 Looking for quiet beach vacation in Florida
- 4 Hawaii wedding
- 5 Total Eclipse of the Sun visible in USA - plan ahead for August 21, 2017
- 6 Charlottesville & NC BBQ Trip Report
- 7 Oregon Coast question
- 8 California road trip
- 9 Luau Worth the Money or Not?
- 10 Blackwater Falls State Park Lodge vs. Canaan Valley Resort
- 11 Oregon Coast with 1, 4 and 6, year old
- 12 Used point to reserve room now a friend wants to stay for free
- 13 Grand Canyon in February?? Doable?
- 14 Self-Guided Walking Tours For Savannah and Charleston
- 15 Moving to Montana
- 16 WNY, Cleveland, and Niagara on the Lake
- 17 Makana Charter Reviews in Kauai?
- 18 Tetons, Yellowstone help
- 19 First Time to Seattle-Portland-Willamette Valley
- 20 Solo Trip to Mid-West
- 21 Savanah GA
- 22 transportation from Plano TX to Norman OK
- 23 Florida with a 2 year old
- 24 traveling I 70 across Colorado
- 25 ASAP Help w/San Fran to San Diego 12 day road trip with young kids
First Time Visit - Boston Over Christmas. Any MUST SEE's ?
Report Abuse
You must be taking advantage of those cheap Aer Lingus fares. Very tempting. I'm still trying to covince my brother (from Kerry) to make the trip this year.
But anyway - That Doubtree is very near the John F Kennedy library. That is always worth a visit but more so currently because there is a exhibit of Jackie's gowns on display that is getting lovely reviews.
Also a great Boston tradition is the Boston Ballet's Nutcracker - the most popular in the world (or so they say). Its spectacular but a bit pricey.
Stroll around the Common to see the lights. You can rent ice skates at the Frog Pond and give it a whirl.
Shopping is great on Newbury Street(trendy) but my brother prefers Filene's and Macy's at Downtown Crossing (more basic but large selections and great sales) He usually comes over every year at this time and does a ton of shopping. Even with the exchange rate its still cheaper for him. (Take the Red Line from near your hotel just a few stops).
Make sure you go to the North End for great Italian food. You can walk into almost any restaurant there and get a great meal. Hanover Street and Salem Street are loaded with choices. The Daily Catch is my favorite.
The Musuem of Fine Arts is also great as well as the Gardener Musuem if you like art.
There's Quincy Market (bars and restaurants and shops - touristy but still nice).
Check out Havard Square over in Cambridge (again take the Red Line).
Take a walk along the Esplanade on the Charles River. Maybe have a drink at the Top of the Hub for a great view.(a bar on the top of the Prudential Center).
If you are still here for New Years Boston celebrates in a big way with First Night.
Enjoy your stay and please be patient with all the Boston Irish who will really want to talk your ear off when they hear your brogues. Many people in Boston are very very proud of their Irish heritage and always want to chat with Irish visitors.
Report Abuse
Thanks Bennie that's a great help. Looking forward to meeting all the "relations"
Report Abuse
Don't miss going up to the observatory in the Prudential building. A wonderful view of the whole area - on a clear day you can actually see the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Lots of great exibits ans such up there also, and it's only about $5 per person! I believe there is also an observatory in the Hancock building, right down the street.
Report Abuse
You should be warned that the Bayside Doubletree is outside of town somewhat. You will have to ride the red line (subway) in.
Welcome to Boston. I hope you have a good visit.
Report Abuse
Hope you have a grea time here.
Some more comments to add to Bennie's list:
One thing you must add to your list is a walk on the Freedom Trail - a trail marked by a line red bricks or red paint. It starts in the Boston Common Park (near the Park Street T - subway - Stop) and winds through old Boston. See America's history - although not so old - and explore Boston on foot. My favorite is the Old State House - there's a little balcony on which our Declaration of Independence was read to the public for the first time. It's a wonderful little building in the middle of skyscrapers.
If you like antiquing, head down Charles Street on Beacon Hill. Walk up the Hill to Louisburg Square - a beautiful neighborhood.
Theater: you can get show tickets 1/2 price on the day of the show at BosTix stands - there is one in Faneiul (sp) Hall and one in Copley Place Park (corner of Dartmouth and Boylston).
Take a tour of the Boston Public Library.
Art Museums: I second the vote to see the Museum of Fine Arts and the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum (this was her home when she died, and instructed that it become a museum in the exact way it was left - not only does it have great art, but it's an amazing building).
Sports: Try to take in a professional ice hockey or basketball game at the Fleet Center.
By the way - I recommend public transportation - do not rent a car and drive in Boston.
I hope you enjoy our city - you picked a great one for your first time to the US!
Report Abuse
Bennie sums it up well!
Doug mentioned the observatories at teh John Hancock & Prudential buildings with their spectacular views.
Unfortunately, Since Sept. 11 the John Hancock observatory was permanatly shut down. I believe the Pridential is still open "Top of the Hub" and is definately worth the view!
I second most of Bennie's suggestions- the Kennedy Library, Quincy Market/Fanueil Hall, North End & Common. The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum with its indoor gardens is also quite beautiful. Enjoy!!!
Report Abuse
I just saw a preview of the new IMAX theater at the New England Aquarium which will be opening to the public next week. It's our first IMAX as the Museum of Science has an Omnimax theater (dome screen). The opening shows will be a 3D under the ocean film which has been around since 1991, but well worth seeing if you have never seen it, or an IMAX film. The NE Aquarium is directly across the street (aka the Big Dig) from Faneuil Hall, and a good place to visit.
Have a great trip and enjoy Boston.
Report Abuse
Totally agree with NOT renting a car. Boston is walkable city and the T (subway) is a fairly decent way to get around. You can buy a 2 or 3 day "passport" for T to make gettting on/off that much easier.
Download comments from Bennie & Jen, they both hit the nail on the head for you as far as what to see.
Welcome to Boston- and enjoy! After visiting the 1st time, I hope you find you need to come back for a 2nd! Have Fun!!!
Report Abuse
Thanks for all the cooments.
I will be traveeling to Boston on the 29th December from the UK ( flying with Virgin Atlantic) and staying until the 1st so looking forward to spending New Year in Boston.
Report Abuse
Don't forget The new england aquarium and faneuil hall. Also, the North End for great Italian. This brings me to my other point. If it is not to late, try to switch your hotel to something in town, preferably the marriot long wharf, from which you can walk to all the above mentioned attractions, and most of the ones everyone else mentioned. Don't rent a car unless you want to drive to maine. Harvard square is fun to check out too. have fun.
Report Abuse
Gregory, New Year's Eve is a wonderful special time to be in Boston. We have the nation's oldest First Night celebration. Parade, fireworks, and lots of excitement in between. Check out www.firstnight.org
Sign in to comment.


text:
This charming property is a small private complex consisting of only 6 suites and built in 2009. The architecture is typical of the Cyclades, dominated by the colours white and blue. Facilities on offer to guests include a lobby area with a 24-hour reception and a hotel safe.
This hotel enjoys an ideal location in the heart of Fira town yet is far enough from the noise of the crowded centre, perched on the top of the wild cliffs. The location offers unlimited views of the endless blue sea and the volcano. Santorini's Thira Airport is 12 km away.
The suites are charming in design. Each features unique interior d�cor and has either a balcony or a terrace with breathtaking views, as well as an outdoor or indoor hot tub so that guests can enjoy privacy and romance. All come with a private bathroom with a shower and a hairdryer and offer a double bed. They are equipped with a direct dial telephone, satellite TV, a hi-fi, Internet access and a safe. Furthermore, a minibar (charges apply), a fridge, tea and coffee making facilities, and individually regulated air conditioning and heating are provided in all accommodation as standard.
Water sports fans can go waterskiing, jet skiing, diving, windsurfing, motor boating, banana boating, sailing or catamaran sailing all for an additional fee. Guests can also try horse riding or explore the surrounding area by bicycle (a charge applies to both).
Guests are served breakfast each morning and the evening meal may be enjoyed � la carte.
American Express, MasterCard and VISA are accepted at this establishment.
Room Facilities:
Direct dial telephone
Satellite cable TV
HiFi stereo system
Internet access
Tea Coffee
Double bed
Individual airconditioned
Individual heating


text:
Sue Burnett Mail Order 8519; ca. 1951; Lines on the diagonal are an important detail of this dress for special dates all through the season.
Links to reviews/blog posts Edit
Sources/Vendors Edit
Gallery Edit
[insert your photos of this pattern made up]
Wishlist Edit
[insert your username, and make sure your preferences allow for people to contact you via e-mail. Do not list your email address here!]


text:
What is JotForm?
JotForm is a free online form builder which helps you create online forms without writing a single line of code. No sign-up required.
At JotForm, we want to make sure that you're getting the online form builder help that you need. Our friendly customer support team is available 24/7.
We believe that if one user has a question, there could be more users who may have the same question. This is why many of our support forum threads are public and available to be searched and viewed. If you'd like help immediately, feel free to search for a similar question, or submit your question or concern.
Can not send a thread into Support Forum as the design has brokenAsked by atleta on February 03, 2017 at 01:11 AM
Unfortunately jotform turned out to be an extremely frustrating experience. I have been writing a detailed report of what I was doing, with screenshots for an hour that I wasn't able to send at first because of this (post button doesn't work):
Then, after editing I got this (see next message, due to the bug above)
JotForm Support
Dear Laszlo,
We are sorry for the inconvenience you have.
This issue probably occurred because you made a change in the web browser size during the typing process into the comment area of the forum.
I have forwarded this issue to our software development team in order to investigate and fix this issue.
Thank you for reporting us.


text:
by: Emmis Digital • 29
All Android applications categories
by: Emmis Digital • 29
93-3 KGSR is an Adult Alternative Radio station that plays the best known adult artists from the 90's, 2000's, and Now! An official partner with South by Southwest and the Austin City Limits music festivals; no other Austin radio station delivers a more critically acclaimed mix of music than 93-3 KGSR.
Features of the app include:
-Access to KGSR live on your Android
-Access to view the last 10 songs that played on KGSR
-Quick link to KGSR's official website www.kgsr.com
-High quality streaming for the best quality and the lowest data consumption
-Music continues to play when the device is locked
Tags: ksgr
from 29 reviews
Download 93.3 KGSR
Free - V2.08.07 - 553K
Sorry ...
This app is no longer available.Explore Android
Share this app


text:
Ned Witte is a shareholder in the Environmental Strategies Practice Group. He has represented publicly- and privately-held clients in the service and manufacturing industries as well as governmental bodies in a wide range of environmental matters across Wisconsin, nationally and globally.
In September 2015, Ned Witte was name the 2016 Best Lawyers® Environmental Law "Lawyer of the Year" in Milwaukee.
Ned has extensive experience in environmental due diligence and liability allocation in real estate, financing and corporate transactions, defense of government- and private party-lead enforcement actions and, conversely, enforcement of environmental contractual rights against third parties, the development and redevelopment of environmentally sensitive and contaminated properties, including Brownfields, coordinating Superfund site response activities, including as chair of steering committees, siting and permitting of manufacturing facilities and renewable and traditional energy projects and financial reporting of environmental liabilities under Sarbanes Oxley and related SEC standards. Ned provides guidance to his clients regarding compliance with myriad environmental laws, remediating contaminated properties, climate change and energy policy, including the Federal Clean Power Plan (CPP), meeting the requirements of water, wetland, and stormwater permitting standards and regulations, and working through complex land use challenges.
Ned has built trust with his clients by providing practical business advice. Ned establishes and maintains positive relationships with his clients' technical environmental experts, government regulators and opposing counsel. Ned's philosophy of teamwork and communication serves his clients' interests by attaining their objectives on budget and in a timely manner.
In addition to representation of lead parties and serving in chair positions for steering committees at Superfund sites in states including Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Vermont, Delaware, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Texas, and California, three CERCLA sites that are reflective of Ned's work in this area are:
Ned represented the lead Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) at the NL Industries/Taracorp smelter superfund site in Granite City, Illinois. Part of this work included negotiating the terms of institutional controls on residential properties over 100 square blocks affected by smelter-generated lead deposition, including use of the Uniform Environmental Covenants Act.
Ned represented a manufacturer in the negotiation of a consent decree to favorably resolve his client's liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) at a site in South Central Wisconsin where the U.S.EPA had completed certain response activities and thereafter commenced cost recovery and contribution civil claims against the company under 42 U.S.C. 9607 and 9613(g)(2) based on the presence of hazardous substances in a community drinking water system. The Consent Decree did not require the client to perform any further response actions at the site and afforded full protections from contribution actions by other PRPs.
Ned has represented a co-PRP in the El Monte Operable Unit of the greater San Gabriel Valley Superfund site. Work on this matter has included coordinating with the co-PRP and jointly retained environmental consultant for design and construction of a plume containment and groundwater remediation system to include extraction, treatment and reinjection of contaminated groundwater in the shallow zone and treatment and conveyance of deep groundwater to the municipal drinking water system pursuant to the provisions of California Drinking Water Program Policy 97-005 (Guidance for Direct Domestic Use of Extremely Impaired Sources). Challenges to implementation of the objectives of the system have included the detection of "Emerging Contaminants" potentially resulting from failure of capture by adjacent remediation systems and unprecedented drought conditions in Southern California.
Ned represented a Michigan based purchaser of an auto parts manufacturer in Grant County, Wisconsin. Ned counseled the purchaser regarding naturally occurring elevated concentrations of lead identified during the phase II investigation, including interpretation of state of Wisconsin guidance.
Ned served as lead environmental counsel to a California investor owned utility in structuring the environmental due diligence and transfer in ownership of hydroelectric watershed properties collectively comprising 140,000 acres of land.
Representing a seller in an asset purchase transaction, Ned coordinated the sale of multiple manufacturing facilities and a national network of service centers for a leading United States manufacturer of elevators and escalators, including pre-sale environmental site assessments and compliance audits, "triage" of conditions identified by these reviews, and the negotiation and allocation of known and potential environmental liabilities in the deal documents.
Ned represents a school district in northeast Wisconsin where a high school was constructed on property that was the prior site of a sand and gravel pit utilized for landfilling of PCB-containing paper sludge. Ned is co-leading a cost recovery action against the corporate successor-in-interest to the paper company that disposed the sludge utilizing the Wisconsin Local Government Negotiation and Cost Recovery Procedure (Wis. Stat. §292.35).
Ned acted as lead counsel in advising a Fortune 100 company in the identification and disclosure of conditions of noncompliance with federal Clean Air Act (CAA) standards at five of the client's facilities, including the absence of any permits where CAA Title V and Prevention of Significant Deterioration permits were necessary. Utilizing the voluntary disclosure protocols under the United States Environmental Protection (U.S.EPA) "Audit Policy", Ned negotiated a Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO) with U.S.EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) that provided for a penalty of $0 based upon cost-effective compliance alternatives proposed to U.S.EPA. In the CAFO, U.S.EPA acknowledged an otherwise potentially assessable penalty of $1.5 million in the CAFO. (U.S.EPA Docket No. HQ-CAA-2008-6001).
Representing the parent company of a multi-state, publicly traded company with internationally known racetracks, casinos and an online wagering company, Ned structured the environmental compliance audits of four racetrack properties and operations in multiple states and the subsequent implementation of an environmental compliance program.
Ned served as lead environmental counsel in advising a passenger train service corporation in regard to the proposed reuse of a Superfund site that included a closed railroad yard with industrial levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as a mixed residential/ retail/transportation development.
Ned has represented a Wisconsin municipality in the Fox River Valley in establishing an action against a party associated with an abandoned manufacturing facility that was deemed to present a fire hazard and was therefore the subject of a raze order. With Ned's assistance, the municipality was able to assert the claim that the adverse party had created, exacerbated and continued nuisance conditions on the property by the party's actions, including by allowing "scrappers" to damage and remove fire suppression infrastructure from the property.
Ned lead a team of environmental lawyers in assembling and preparing the narrative for the successful applications for two, approximately 50-mile 345-kilovolt transmission lines in North Central Wisconsin designed to relieve congestion and add transfer capability in the area. The applications were the first prepared pursuant to Wisconsin Law providing for joint applications to the Wisconsin Public Service Commission and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. (PSC Dockets 137-CE-122 and 137-CE-123).
In late 2014, the Board of Health of a county in East Central Wisconsin passed a motion that a wind energy system consisting of eight, 2.5 MW wind turbines constitutes a "human health hazard" pursuant to state law, as implemented at the county level. Ned represented the owner of the wind farm in developing and presenting a response challenging the legitimacy of the county body's actions based on applicable Wisconsin law in this pending matter.
Chair, American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Environment, Energy & Natural Resources (SEER) Media Relations (Special Committee on Marketing and Communications Committee)
Vice Chair – Communications of ABA SEER Climate Change, Sustainable Development and Ecosystems Committee
Member, Vermont Law School Environmental Advisory Committee (2012-present)
Chair and Gift Chair, Vermont Law School Class of 1989 25th Reunion
Vice Chair - Technology, American Bar Association, Section of Environment
Energy and Natural Resources In-House Counsel Committee (2012-2014)
Co-Chair, Vermont Law School Dean's Development Council (2008-2011)
Member, Board of Zoning Appeals, Village of Bayside, Wisconsin (2003‑2005)
Village Trustee, Village of Bayside, Wisconsin (1997-2003)
Co-Chair, Milwaukee Bar Association Environmental Law Section (1998‑1999)
Member, Vermont Law School Alumni Association Board of Directors (1995‑1998)
Chairman, Milwaukee Pollution Prevention Partnership (1997‑1998)
Chairman, Greater Milwaukee Toxics Minimization Task Force (1994-1997)
Schlitz Audubon Nature Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Past Member, Board of Directors)
Riveredge Nature Center, Newberg, Wisconsin (Past Member, Board of Directors)
Teacher, 8th and 9th Grade Latin, 7th Grade English, Applewild School, Fitchburg, Massachusetts (1983-1986)
Johnson Controls, Inc. 2008 Merit Award for Customer Satisfaction and Employee Ingenuity, Volatile Organic Compound Emission Reduction Team
2015 Recipient of Wisconsin Law Journal's "Leaders in the Law" Award
Recognized by Chambers USA (Natural Resources & Environmental, 2010 ‑ 2016)
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America (Environmental Law 2006 – 2016; 2016 Environmental Law "Lawyer of the Year" in Milwaukee)
Recognized as a Wisconsin Super Lawyer (2009 – 2012)
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating (2011 – present)
Wisconsin Top Rated Lawyer in Environmental Law & General Practice (based on Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Rating) 2013
Recipient, Vermont Law School American Jurisprudence Award in Law of Water Resources, Fall 1987
Masters of Studies of Environmental Law, Vermont Law School, magna cum laude
Juris Doctor, Vermont Law School, cum laude
Bachelor of Arts, University of Vermont
Return to Listing
Disclaimer and Legal Notices
Copyright © 2016 Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
Attorneys at Law - All rights reserved.
Client Login


text:
Kuala Lumpur: The pressure of having to make it to the final off his back, Indias chief coach Rajinder Singh said on Friday that his boys would go all out to ensure they win their maiden Asia Cup hockey title on Sunday.
India raised their game by several notches in the dying minutes of their semi-final match against holders South Korea to make it to the final of the sixth edition of the prestigious tournament with a 4-2 win.
Though we did miss a couple of chances, we made up by scoring late in the second half. It was a good victory for the team, a much-relieved Rajinder said after the match.
He conceded the Koreans gave India a scare by scoring first after a goalless first half but was pleased that his boys managed to launch a late rally to make it to their fifth Asia Cup final.
Now we are geared to take on any team in the final. We are confident of even beating Pakistan, he said.
The coach said the Koreans played a very fast game but India did well to avail the chances that they got late in the second half.
There is pressure on every team to win. My boys did well to withstand the pressure, he said.
Rajinder was not too worried about India conceding a goal in the last minute saying when the teams are under pressure such things are common.
The Koreans launched an attack but in doing that they also left open spaces and made it easy for our forwards to score, he said.
The coach defended his decision to take Sandeep Michael out of the attack although his rationale was not too convincing.
I want Michael to play for another 10 years. I dont want to put him under too much pressure as he is young. I want him to learn more and more by sitting on the sidelines, he said.
On defender Dilip Tirkey missing a simple chance off Indias first penalty corner, Rajinder said, He was not rightly positioned. So he slipped to miss the chance.
Asked whether it had become a regular habit for Indian players to earn a yellow card in the last few minutes, Rajinder said, Not much can be done about rough tackles because the pressure is simply too much in the last few minutes. It has become a part of the game in high-pressure matches.
Michael, who gave India the breakthrough and helped the team equalise 1-1, said he did not go for a direct hit as the Korean goalkeeper had padded away such shots successfully.
I thought I would deceive him and score and this is what happened.
Baljit Singh Saini said India will play their hearts out in the final notwithstanding who our opponent is.
The team is really high on spirit now and wants to win the final, Saini said. (PTI)


text:
624 pages, 11 b/w photos, 250 b/w illustrations, 35 tables
Why do you switch from walking to running at a specific speed? Why do tall trees rarely blow over in high winds? And why does a spore ejected into air at seventy miles per hour travel only a fraction of an inch?
Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World is the first and only textbook that takes a comprehensive look at the mechanical aspects of life – covering animals and plants, structure and movement, and solids and fluids. An ideal entry point into the ways living creatures interact with their immediate physical world, this revised and updated edition examines how the forms and activities of animals and plants reflect the materials available to nature, considers rules for fluid flow and structural design, and explores how organisms contend with environmental forces.
Drawing on physics and mechanical engineering, Steven Vogel looks at how animals swim and fly, modes of terrestrial locomotion, organism responses to winds and water currents, circulatory and suspension-feeding systems, and the relationship between size and mechanical design. He also investigates links between the properties of biological materials – such as spider silk, jellyfish jelly, and muscle – and their structural and functional roles. Early chapters and appendices introduce relevant physical variables for quantification, and problem sets are provided at the end of each chapter.
Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World is useful for physical scientists and engineers seeking a guide to state-of-the-art biomechanics. For a wider audience, Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World establishes the basic biological context for applied areas – including ergonomics, orthopedics, mechanical prosthetics, kinesiology, sports medicine, and biomimetics – and provides materials for exhibit designers at science museums.
Praise for the previous edition:
"Throughout the book, Vogel introduces the formulae and principles that matter in a clear manner, and illustrates them with a dizzying array of biological and physical examples [...] . [T]his book is tremendous fun to read. Vogel writes with an effervescent sense of delight in his subject. The text is laced with wit and humor, and sprinkled with eclectic examples of nature's many marvels. None of the fun, however, diminishes the clarity."
– Daniel E. Lieberman, Nature
"I tried skim-reading Steven Vogel's Comparative Biomechanics [...] but was compromised: the volume has so many little gems scattered throughout that my eye got caught by the glitter and couldn't escape. In earlier books, Vogel introduced biomechanics piecemeal. Now he has written an integrated textbook on the subject."
– Julian F. V. Vincent, Science
"Science books are generally read for three reasons: it is assigned, it provides an introduction to an unfamiliar field, or because it is a truly enjoyable read. Great science books meet all three [...] . With Comparative Biomechanics, Vogel has now produced a book that meets all three criteria of a great science book."
– Scott Turner, Quarterly Review of Biology
Lays out the key concepts of biomechanics using examples from throughout...
There are currently no reviews for this product. Be the first to review this product!
Steven Vogel is James B. Duke Professor Emeritus of Biology at Duke University. His numerous books include Glimpses of Creatures in Their Physical Worlds (Princeton) and Cats' Paws and Catapults.


text:
I am a London-based portrait photographer, shooting portraits of musicians, sports stars and all sorts of talented folk in locations across the nation and worldwide. It's a great gig.
I'm a Hasselblad Ambassador and recently shot the campaign images to launch the new H6D.
My latest project, Eldmodur, documents the correlation between the brutal yet darkly beautiful landscape of Iceland, with their athletes' incredible capacity for success in the sport of crossfit. I've published a portfolio of images in magazine format and you should get one, you really should.
I'm a member of the House of St Barnabas, and proudly shoot portraits of their graduates, team and guest speakers.
I've a few nice photo-based projects on the go, including a wonderful one for War Child which has been released unto the world in book and print form, raising funds for their incredible work.
I've recently exhibited at agencies Mother and Publicis and the Gibson Showroom in London. I was also accepted into the 2015 Taylor Wessing Photographic Portrait Prize with my image of Gilbert and George and the 2016 Open Series in the AoP Awards for my work with Riders For Health in Liberia.
I do lots of project work, self-initiated and self-funded that you're likely hear about via my blog and Twitter pages first I'm sure, alongside the other inevitable proclamations of self-interest.


text:
The Woods
by Amy Rowan Moffitt
About the Book
Features & Details
- Category Comics & Graphic Novels
Standard Portrait, 7.75×9.75 in, 20×25 cm
62 Pages
- Publish Date May 19, 2013
See More
About the Creator
Amy Moffitt
City or County, Country
Hello! My name is Amy and I like to draw cartoons. I have just completed my first graphic novel, 'The Woods'.
Log in or create an account to post a comment.
0 Comments
Delete this comment?
See More


text:
Since the judgment of the ECJ in Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González (C-131/12), the Press has been full of articles and opinions about whether this is a practice that inhibits the freedom of expression, or whether individuals should be free to use the so-called "right to be forgotten" to reassert their privacy.
The Media Society (@themediasociety) organised a debate hosted by ITN (@itn) last night on this very issue. The chair of the debate was Alastair Stewart OBE, long serving newsreader for ITN, and speaking in the debate were:
- Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner;
- John Whttingdale MP, Chairman of the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee;
- Holly Watt, Whitehall and Investigations Editor for the Telegraph;
- Peter Barron, Director of Communications for EMEA Google;
- John Battle, Head of Compliance for ITN;
- Anya Proops, an information law barrister at 11KBW; and
- Professor Luciano Floridi, Professor of Philosophy and Ethics of Information at the University of Oxford (joining the conversation by Google Hangout).
The hashtag for the debate was #rewritinghistory.
The event kicked off with a video put together by Cathy Newman:
The basic premise that the balance between privacy and the freedom of speech is a difficult one to achieve, especially in the age of the internet leviathans such as Google or Facebook. Yet the concerns about privacy are not new; ever since computers became an everyday part of life and business, there has been a perceived risk that people's privacy will be lost. This led to the passing of the Data Protection Act 1984, which gave people the right to know what information was held about them. Not long after this, the European Union passed the Data Protection Directive, which was later put into effect in the UK by the Data Protection Act 1998. This Act is significant, as it provided an exemption for journalists (s 32). Since then, the judiciary has been struggling with the balance.
However, the balance has been changed by the recent Google Spain case setting out a principle that individuals have the right to be forgotten. The ICO has put together draft guidelines following this judgment, and there are concerns that this will encourage the curbing of the freedom of expression. Given that local and national data protection authorities will have to deal with the judgment by setting out such guidelines for journalists, the essential question is whether there will be greater censorship or whether journalists are merely overreaching with their concerns.
Stewart then set up some of the key questions for the debate: is this essentially a fight between the Internet and governments?; is the protection afforded by the judgment excessive?; given the different protections afforded to privacy across the different EU states, will the UK move further away from the rest of the EU on this matter?; or are journalists being a bit precious with their concerns?
The first person invited to speak was Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner. He started off by saying that the judgment is part of an overall review of the rules of engagement between Articles 8 and 10 ECHR, the right to privacy and the right to know. He acknowledged that there are some concerns about the changes, but pointed to an article in The Times on 8 July which claimed the result would be the forced destruction of material. In effect, he said, the Press were claiming this to be an EU removal of the s 32 protection. He said that this was almost 1984-esque in its analysis, rewriting what was happening to fit the narrative. However he was at pains to point out that the sky was not falling in.
He firmly reminded everyone that the media is not above the law, and that individuals do have the right to challenge the journalistic exemption under s 32 if something is not truly public interest journalism. This right to challenge the Press is being put across as a "chilling effect". The Press do have the right to "tell it like it is", but they do some from a privileged position. The ECJ judgment has confirmed that a search engine is a data processor and a data controller, and therefore the request to remove search engine results is in line with the Data Protection Principles as they stand. He points out that other legislation has created the right to be forgotten, such as the Protection of Freedoms Act and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act.
One aspect of the judgment he does not necessarily welcome, however, is the expected tsunami of complaints to the ICO if Google (or any other body) refuses a requested. However, he notes that the prospective Data Protection Regulation will not remove the s 32 protection, it is safe. He finally mentioned the consultation his office is engaged in to gather views on how the judgment should work in practice.
Stewart then asked where he drew the line between public interest journalism and more general journalism. Graham acknowledged that the distinction was hard to spell out, but noted that publication of serious journalism was a key factor. He noted that this could also include celebrity publication but they were more likely to act in a way that breached the data protection principles.
Stewart further queried whether this judgment went beyond the deletion of redundant data and may result in data, such as that held by journalists for future use or verification, may be subject to deletion. Graham's response noted that this judgment was focused on search engines, and their algorithms can be manipulated to bring something to the fore or hide it. The effect this manipulation can have can be very damaging. It is impossible to have a regular clear-out of data by way of an algorithm but search engines do need to act in line with the principles.
Stewart then asked Professor Floridi whether the matter was one of too much ill-founded pragmatism, and whether there was in fact a real danger that interested parties were looking at the rules of engagement without thinking about the balance.
Professor Floridi responded that the judgment seemed to be more about upgrading the rules as they stand, rather than a comprehensive revision. The information that can be taken down in minimal, as it only works on a name and a URL and must be a request, individuals can find the information and links in other ways. The compromise that has been created by the ECJ and by Google is not suitable. Information is stratified, and a stratified response is required to solve the issue.
Stewart moved onto John Whittingdale MP, asking whether the law needs to be reviewed because the situation is now a mess. Whittingdale agreed. His opinion was that the law as it stood was clear, as he thought it clear for the Data Retention Directive, but now a much broader view of the content is required. When asked by Stewart about whether this notion of the public interest should be considered in primary legislation, Whittingdale responded that any such attempt would not hold up to scrutiny. Whittingdale was of the view that Google is essentially a large cutting library, and it makes no sense to require the removal of the "card index" to any such library, given the size of it. He also had concerns about those people who would be making the judgement calls on whether to remove the information. When asked whether we could move away from the EU on this matter, Whittingdale noted the current political difficulties with Europe and suggested that we could, looking at the wider context of how the UK value freedom of expression compared to other countries. Graham added that the important thing to do now is consider how the proposed Data Protection Regulation will maintain or alter the protections offered.
Stewart then asked John Battle whether the judgment had changed the compliance work at all. John's response was that the judgment is difficult to apply, and in his view the sky is indeed falling in. His view mirrored that of Whittingdale, that the law was settled, and that journalists had clear protection. His concern was that the new Regulation had the broad balance approach but no clear journalistic protection. Added to this was the take-down notices that journalists were receiving from Google after a link was removed, and he feared that there was question of whether journalistic protection still existed.
Stewart moved onto Peter Barron to get his response from the Google side of things. He asked whether Google was behaving excessively in just agreeing to take down the links so quickly. Barron answered that they had a fine line to work with. Google has already reached 70 000 requests, and gets about 1 000 requests a day. Each one has to be dealt with individually. When asked about the guidelines Google employees use to make their decision, he responded that the ruling was vague, and the question of whether something was irrelevant or out-of-date was hard to examine in practice.
Stewart asked whether Google was tempted to take a hard line on the judgment and really minimise the links removed, because currently it appeared a removal was too easy to get. Barron said that there are three categories of requests: automatically remove; leave; and request more information. He said that this was a very fine line to work with, and that it was essentially a matter between the journalists and the ICO, but overall the judgment makes it clear that privacy trumps free expression. While they would like to leave all matters for the ICO to deal with, Google could not as such (in)action is against the law. When asked whether Google employees were acting as both judge and jury, Barron agreed that they were; conventionally, either the publisher had agreed to the take down, or there was a court order. Google did not want this power or responsibility, but they have no choice. In any event, there is always an appeal to the ICO by an individual. Here Barron noted the asymmetrical process, as journalists do not have the right of appeal to the ICO to reinstate links.
Stewart asked Professor Floridi whether he thought the judgment had resulted in nonsense. Floridi agreed, stating that the whole thing was a waste of financial and mental resources, especially as those searching could use US search engines to avoid the EU jurisdiction affecting their results. He said that this was a crucial issue and needed more consideration considering the impact of the judgment.
Graham then stepped in and said that the reality was that Google is a commercial business and makes its money from publishing personal data. He then pointed to the recent spat between George Clooney and the Daily Mail as something that would appear higher up on a list of search engine results for Clooney than his acting or charitable work. Stewart pointed out that this is in fact a good example of the ethics of a national newspaper being brought to the fore, but, while accepting it was a poor example, Graham said that Google is more than just a card index. Every case is different and needs to be looked at carefully. Barron agreed, saying that some cases are difficult to judge, and something may be in the public interest but the privacy rights of the individual may trump it. He pointed to an example of where the mother of an abuse victim made the request to take down links, because it would permanently follow the victim and may affect her future if employers searched for her. Barron believed in this case, despite the obvious public interest, the removal was the right thing to do.
Stewart then asked Anya Proops whether the judgment had made her work more complex. She agreed, but pointed out that the discussion surrounding the matter was veering away from the key notion that a principle has been created where privacy trumps the right to know. This judgment is a clear assault on the freedom of expression, as there was no consideration of the democratic deficit this could result in, and there was no consideration at all of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, particularly Article 11 which restates the right to freedom of expression across Europe.
She was also clear that there was no meaningful effect, given the lack of impact on search engines outside of Europe, and that the media were republishing material to show that it still had relevance and was in the public interest now. Stewart noted that Proops was acting in a case touching on those issues, but asked her whether this may have any impact on getting publicity for whistleblowing activity. Proops agreed with Graham that the new Regulation does extinguish the protection for journalists. Rather what it does is removes the monopoly away from the traditional media, it makes the protection more inclusive. While she could not discuss the details, she said that a case she was acting in hinged upon the question whether campaigning NGOs could use the exemption as it currently stands under s 32.
When asked whether there was a sensible solution, Proops noted that she thinks the ECJ got it wrong, and has set the discussions on the balance back. Any solution needs to serve both the interests of individuals to protect their privacy and the right to receive information. Graham added that he believed the situation could work, but that it requires all the relevant data protection authorities to create unified guidelines.
Holly Watt was asked for her views, but she believed that there were too many issues to sort the matter sensibly, and that for as long as she had been working as a journalist the entire question had been in a state of flux. Her role is connecting disparate information, and the judgment certainly limits her ability to do her job. Stewart asked her whether this was something that the Press deserved, given the public attitude to revelations over the previous few years. She believes that it depends on the example. Hers was the politicians' expenses data, which was incredibly important at the time and still has an impact now. The paper still has the data, despite the ICO not being keen on it and against the recommendations of Leveson LJ. She said that the Press has had a difficult time lately, but it really needs to look forward.
Whittingdale noted that the intention of Parliament was to make what was (un)lawful offline the same online. He also pointed to s 12 Human Rights Act, where Parliament expressly set out the free of expression to the UK legal identity. His concern is that this judgment has concerns for liberty. When asked whether his committee should act on this, Whittingdale that this is more for the Ministry of Justice, though it is something he is happy to pursue. Graham said what should happen is a moratorium on action until a few cases have been appealed to the ICO and beyond, as this will ensure the right balance is drawn now. Proops disagreed, noting that the issue is EU wide. The UK has a strong value in freedom of expression, but other states do not and this will lead to patchwork protection. The whole purpose of the Directive and the Regulation is for one law across Europe.
Stewart then opened the debate to questions from the floor.
(AF note: I could not hear all the names, so apologies there. However, if people know the speaker's name I am happy to fill it in)
A speaker from the University of Cambridge noted that the panel was slightly unbalanced towards the freedom of expression. He said that leaving it to the courts may be wrong, and that we should consider looking at the matter from a constitutional point of view. He also said that Google needs to focus on its responsibilities.
Mark Stephens (@MarksLarks), a well-respected media lawyer, asked two questions: 1) what is the ICO's definition of journalism; and 2) whether the office will be getting more resources to deal with the expected appeals.
Graham responded that funding is a separate issue, as he is reliant upon notification fees for data protection registration, and only gets money from the government for the FOI work. Regarding a definition of journalism, he noted that it was hard to define, but if it walked like a journalist, talked liked a journalist … What matters is the public interest, and balancing a very difficult balance. Proops responded that this could lead to serious censorship if a piece did not meet the "serious journalism" threshold. She said we should also not forget how the less serious journalism funds the more serious journalism. Professor Floridi noted the difficulties of finding a definition, but highlighted a key principle in the debate, that the information is untouched and that accessibility to information is what is at stake here.
The next comments from the floor were from Lord Inglewood, who noted that the judgment is fixed currently so pressure needs to be exercised politically. Pressure needs to be exerted on the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the UK Parliament. He also raised the question as to whether a challenge could be raised in the European Court of Human Rights.
Joshua Rozenberg (@JoshuaRozenberg) asked two questions. Firstly, he asked whether using a non-EU version of Google would reveal all the "missing" links, which Barron confirmed is correct. He then asked whether Google should set up an internal review process, given that journalists cannot complain to the ICO. Barron said that webmasters have got in contact to reinstate links, most noticeably articles by Robert Peston on Merrill Lynch and certain Guardian articles. He said that Google has also announced the creation of an advisory board to discuss the broader issues at stake. Graham added that journalists in such circumstances do not have data protection rights contrary to those of individuals, but that Google is not and cannot be the final arbiter of such decisions. When Barron said that small search engines may not be able to cope with the costs that Google can lay out for extra staff and the like, Graham responded that that is the nature of business.
Katie Hind, Showbiz Editor for the Sunday People, asked whether there was a danger the ICO was creating an uneven playing field and making it more difficult for popular journalism. Graham responded that the information was still available, just not as easy to get to. His role is to help individuals who want to assert their data protection right. The facts of each case are what matters, and that self-interested voices are clouding the issue.
Bob Satchwell, the Executive Director of the Society of Editors said that the issue was getting further muddled. The question of resources and practicality is important, but what matters is the point of principle. Our value for the freedom of expression is high, but other EU states do not have the same value (here he pointed to France, noted for its pro-privacy stance towards its politicians). When asked by Stewart if this judgment was a case of self-inflicted wounds, Mr Satchwell responded that some journalists had done bad things, but the public is more concerned about the stories that they are not allowed to print.
James Milligan from the Direct Marketing Association noted that the first data protection legislation in this country came from a pre-Internet age, but the caselaw is now based on the reality of the Internet. It is important to lobby for a sensible Regulation. The Regulation is currently at the negotiation stage in the Council of Ministers, so there is still time for more lobbying to be done.
Greg Neale of the Media Society and founding editor of BBC History Magazine said that the issue is wider than first considered, considering historians and NGOs, among others, collect data for their work. Perhaps it is time to widen the concept of journalism and journalist to afford greater protections. The power of such rights is to be able to use the rights available to citizens in ways other than as an ordinary citizen. As a citizen first then a journalist, he should be able to use all the rights afforded to him as a citizen.
Another speaker from the floor agreed with that analysis, for if privacy trumps freedom of expression then there is an issue. Setting journalists apart however is not the right answer, given the move towards citizen journalists. Neither is keeping the status quo. What is important is that neither right trumps the other.
This was a debate with passionately held views on either side. It did seem that Christopher Graham came in for criticism, given his stance as the Information Commissioner, but his role as he explained is to help individuals assert their data protection rights. Three points from the debate stand out:
- one from Joshua Rozenberg, that it is possible to use other search engines based outside of the EU to get the lost results. This seems to make both the judgment and the surrounding panic about it redundant, if the ease of access to information is still there;
- one from Professor Floridi that links to the above, that the information itself remains, and all that is being removed is the easy access to it by a search engine by using the target's name; and
- one from the speakers on the floor, that journalistic protections should be expanded to protect those who are not members of the traditional Press but do their own investigative work and blogging.
The third point above seems the easiest to deal with. The way that people take in and report information has changed dramatically over the past thirty years. The rise of blogging and search engines has allowed people to do their own digging and publish their own reports on matters of (to them) public interest. The work often has real value and yet, as matters stand, such bloggers are not entitled to the protection afforded by s 32 Data Protection Act. This may seem an affront to the principle of protection given that celebrity or more tabloid journalism can have that same protection. It is certainly a protection that needs to be enshrined in the new Regulation, noting that citizens of Europe are more than capable of using data in the public interest and should be protected.
The others can be lumped together. What actual use is this judgment if the search results can easily be found simply by changing the location settings on a browser? Quite simply, none. The rights to impart and receive information are still strong. Perhaps what this judgment brings out is that a new sub-right based upon these rights is now being determined, the right to easily accessible information. At what point does information become hard enough to find that the right to receive that information has been breached? Given the judgment, it seems that any such threshold must be high.


text:
Labor Day Carnival Parade
Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, NY
Monday, September 1, 2008
The West Indian American Day Carnival is the biggest parade in New York with over 3 million participants each year. The parade depicts elaborately designed costumes, illustrating beauty and pageantry.
A Few Tips:
Go out early.
You should find a good spot early where you can see clearly. You should be very patient; the thickness of the crowd makes things move slowly.
Dress comfortably.
Wear shoes that you can walk long distances in. people will be stepping on your toes so open toe sandals are not recommended.
Drink plenty of water.
The sun will be on your head for hours, coupled with the crowds; it is easy to get dehydrated.
Bring your flag!
Represent your country with your national flag or rag.
Get plenty of rest.
For those who are going to J'Ouvert the night before, playing mas, or both, it is imperative to get enough rest before going on the Parkway.
Carnival time is a time for celebration. There is no room for sour faces. Come out and enjoy yourselves.
*Fun Fridays*


text:
WWE Vengeance Results
October 24, 2011 by staff
WWE Vengeance Results, Dinner dreams of vengeance fell, titanic confrontation leads to the collapse of the ring.
The eighth edition of WWE Vengeance came to you, live on pay-per-view, the AT & T Center in San Antonio, TX. After Mrs. & R-Truth absolute havoc Triple H WWE COO in Hell in a Cell, which led to Triple H to be relieved of his duties running RAW, "The Game" Triple H returns to action as he form a team with CM Punk likely to meet the reinstated Miz & R-Truth. After Alberto Del Rio locked out of John Cena Hell in a structure, allowing Alberto Del Rio to take the WWE title from Cena Cena, and watched helplessly,
Cena gets his chance to redeem himself when Cena challenges Alberto Del Rio to WWE Championship in a Last Man Standing Match, where the only way to win is to defeat your opponent to the point where it is unable to answer the referee's count. After it took three months of his career by Mark Henry, Big Show would make Mark Henry which validates the career of "The World's Strongest Man," as Big Show Mark Henry challenges the World Heavyweight Championship. After being assaulted and bags for the Intercontinental Champion Cody Rhodes a few weeks ago in the cost of raw and still the World Heavyweight Title Rhodes that week, he was "The Viper" Randy Orton get his revenge as he goes one-on-one with his former protege. During the past month, Christian Match Sheamus cost reiterated after the game, including a Battle Royal # 1 contender for the world heavyweight title a few weeks ago, not to mention several Christian spears, "The Great White" Sheamus went one on one with "Mr. A game more" Christian. After the new interim General Manager John Laurinaitis RAW awarded Jack Swagger Dolph Ziggler & another chance in the WWE team titles held by the pen of air, SmackDown General Manager Theodore Long turned the opportunity into a nightmare for Dolph Ziggler on SmackDown Dolph GM made the announcement that will be competing twice in the same night that will also defend his title Dolph United States against "Woo Woo Woo Kid The" Zack Ryder. After finally defeated Beth Phoenix with her best friend, Kelly Kelly, in the Hell in a Cell, twice Eva challenges Divas Champion "The Glamazon" for the Divas title.
The results match
WWE Tag Team Championship: Boom Air (c) def. Jack Swagger & Dolph Ziggler Evan Bourne by (c) Dolph Ziggler to retain deposited following Air Bourne.
United States Championship: Dolph Ziggler (c) (with Jack Swagger) def. Zack Ryder by pin following a Super Kick to retain.
Divas Championship: Beth Phoenix (c) def. Pin with Eve Glam Slam to retain.
Sheamus def. Christian by pin following the Brogue kick.
The Miz & R-Truth (with Kevin Nash) def. Triple H & CM Punk CM Punk The Miz for the next Final nails little Jimmy.
Non-Title: Randy Orton def. Cody Rhodes (with Packers) by pin following the RKO.
World Heavyweight Championship: Mark Henry (c) & fight Big Show in a No Contest after the ring is imploded by a superplex. As a result, Mark Henry (c) holds.
WWE Championship: Man of the Match: Alberto Del Rio (c) (with The Miz, R-Truth, & Ricardo Rodriguez) def. John Cena to retain.
Detailed results
After Vickie Guerrero ear piercing introduction of his two clients, the opening match of the night went to the team's championship as the WWE United States Champion Boom & Dolph Ziggler Jack Swagger air challenge, Evan Bourne & Kofi Kingston, WWE Team Titles in the first two games Dolph title of the night. After a hard-fought match was Kofi Kingston beat Dolph Ziggler with the Trouble in Paradise, which puts the United States Champion in the perfect position for Evan Bourne Bourne air en route to the air plume successfully maintain the equipment WWE's titles.
Mere moments after being on the wrong side of Trouble in Paradise by Kofi Kingston and Evan Bourne Bourne air, Dolph Ziggler with Vickie Guerrero and Jack Swagger in his corner, will defend the title against the United States in "The Long Island Iced Z "Zack Ryder, Air Boom WWE Champions Team in your corner! During the match, Dolph Ziggler was sent abroad and as Dolph tried to crawl, grab a hold of Dolph Air Boom and cast back into the ring. Having seen this, the Champions WWE referee ejected from ringside equipment. Later in the match, Jack Swagger Zack Ryder travel outside the ring, which leads to Ryder Swagger take place abroad. However, the brief distraction can take Ryder Dolph blockbuster shot the way to retain the U.S. title.
Before the fight for the title of Diva, a WWE.com exclusive video was shown depicting Beth Phoenix Kelly Kelly backstage attack, leading to a fight between Eve and the Divas Champion. This leads to anarchy backstage Raw interim General Manager John Laurinaitis ban Natalya and Kelly Kelly both from the front row for the Divas title.
The Divas title on the line was revenge as "The Glamazon" Beth Phoenix defends the Divas title against two-time champion yesterday. During the meeting, the day before only to use the tactic of using the ultimate crown Beth Phoenix to tie the Divas Champion half of the rope, allowing Eve to land some kicks in good position to "The Glamazon". Despite an impressive effort from Eve, Beth Phoenix takes advantage of a lost Evesault to hit the Glam Slam at night on the way to retain the Divas title.
After being repeatedly attacked by the Christians during the last weeks, not to mention cost the World Heavyweight title in more than one occasion, "The Great White" Sheamus seeks revenge as he faces "Mr. A game more" Christian . After a hard-fought game, was the capture of Christian Sheamus Brogue launch on the way to pick up the victory.
Then it was time shooting Triple H WWE COO revenge as "The Game" is a strange alliance with "The Voice of the Voiceless" for CM Punk to face the team of the newly restored Miz & R-Truth. During the match, Triple H is R-Truth to fight outside the ring, while CM Punk GTS ready to deliver to The Miz in the ring, when out of nowhere, the fired Kevin Nash comes through the crowd and delivery to the right hand to Triple H! The appearance of Kevin Nash temporarily distracts Punk long enough for R-Truth to return to the ring as Miz & Truth maneuver successfully new doubles team, Little Jimmy Finale, the road deposited Punk The Miz for the win! While the party was over, the fight on the outside was not like Kevin Nash continues the attack on Triple H, sending his old friend in the steel steps before shooting him in the ring. Nash is polished by planting assault Triple H Jackknife Powerbomb with atrocious. Nash then exits the ring and makes his exit through the crowd as arbitrators tend to Triple H and assisted him in the ring. What is the condition after the attack Triple H Kevin Nash? How Kevin Nash was fired into the sand?
After being assaulted by Cody Rhodes and pouches and cost of the World Heavyweight Title Rhodes a few weeks ago, Randy Orton was out for revenge like "The Viper" was one-on-one with Intercontinental Champion Cody Rhodes. During the game, one of the packers Cody Rhodes came to the platform of the ring and Orton covers but bagger, Rhodes sets and delivers the Cross Rhodes to Orton, but Orton manages to take. Intercontinental Champion then looks to deliver the ultimate insult of "The Viper" by delivering the RKO, but Orton sees it coming and offers a dropkick. Orton then prepares for the RKO on Rhodes, but the other bagger in the ring and fell in "The Viper" before a search takes Orton to RKO Rhodes en route to pick up the victory.
Then it was time for the world heavyweight title that is defended as "the strongest champion of the world" Mark Henry defends the world heavyweight title against the man who carried out three months ago, "World's Largest Athlete" Big Show. After Mark Henry starts out of the chokeslam Big Show misses World's Strongest Slam, a desperate Mark Henry goes to the top rope, but is captured by Big Show, which offers a chokeslam off the top rope. After Mark Henry starts off the top rope chokeslam from Big Show decides to try his hand at the top, but is caught by Mark Henry and Big Show meets Henry over the top rope, delivering a superplex Big Show , a huge superplex that even the rebar could not handle ring as the ring is collapsing with the weight and strength of the superplex! After the abrupt and shocking end to the game world heavyweight title, referees and medical staff make their way to the remains of the track to help both competitors back. While EMT manage to get the Big Show in a cart and wheel him back, Mark Henry refuses to accept help from anyone, on several occasions before finally falling to accept help as World Heavyweight Champion miraculously walks to the back of his own power! As Mark Henry was helped to the back, interim general manager John Laurinaitis RAW announced that, despite the implosion of the state of the track, the main event for the WWE Championship still take place at Vengeance.
Complete with a ring of implosion thanks to Mark Henry and Big Show, it was time for the main event, Alberto Del Rio defends the WWE Championship against John Cena in a Last Man Standing Match, where the only way to win is defeat your opponent to the point of being unable to get to their feet by the referee's count of ten. During the single party, Alberto Del Rio gets creative as WWE Champion John Cena puts the steel ring post before jumping down on the job, driving that Cena's chest! Later in the match, John Cena will pull the Rio through the ropes on the outside, but the strings are collapsed, Del Rio candles in the air and on the barricade at ringside. Later, the fight goes all the way to the backstage area and, after a close call with a huge anvil case, Del Rio responds to bury Dinner in four plays made of steel, but Cena manages to combat to avoid the debris count of ten. Soon after, Del Rio and Cena fight in the entrance area in Del Rio sent Cena crashing into the giant "V" on the set! Del Rio sets a table before getting a piece of the series, but Cena recovers, grabbing Del Rio and pulling it down and across the table. Back in the ringside area, Del Rio throws dinner table in the notice before removing the Spanish announce table, but Cena fights back, sending WWE Champion before the barricade delivering a clothesline Ricardo Rodr?guez. Cena then sets the steel steps next to the Spanish announce table before delivering the Attitude Adjustment to Del Rio by the Spanish announce table!
With Alberto Del Rio down the outside of the ring, John Cena is caught in the collapsed ring The Miz & R-Truth as the duo hit the # 1 Contender. The assault by The Miz & R-Truth on Cena draws the attention of the referee far from having Del Rio as the referee turns his attention to have dinner, barely manages to recover. As soon as Cena makes his feet, however, Del Rio explosions in the challenger with the title belt WWE before collapsing on the outside of the ring. While Del Rio just manages to get to his feet, Cena is not as fortunate as Cena is unable to make the referee's count of ten, which means that Del Rio is the victory and still Champion WWE!
Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of U.S.S.POST.


text:
The Lindbergh Foundation announced last month the recent launch of the Aviation Green Investment Fund (AGI-Fund), an initiative that encourages corporations and individuals to support scientific research and education projects within the industry. The foundation supports many aviation-related research projects, sponsored by companies such as Lycoming Engines and Jeppesen. The latest grant recipient, Dr. Amy Lang, proposed a method of reducing aircraft drag by 30 percent. "The Aviation Green Investment Fund is an alternative to carbon offset programs for aviation operators who want to demonstrate that they are sensitive to environmental issues and willing to take action," said foundation chairman John King. "Carbon offsets can be ineffective and at best offer break-even results." The suggested donation for participation in the Aviation Green Investment Fund is eight cents for each gallon of fuel used.
Foundation Offers Alternative to Offsets
- December 27, 2007, 11:23 AM


text:
soft touch
Definition of soft touch
: a person who is easily imposed on or taken advantage of
Examples of soft touch in a Sentence
His friends all know that he's a soft touch.
the kindly old woman was a soft touch for any con man with a hard-luck story
First Known Use of soft touch
SOFT TOUCH Defined for English Language Learners
soft touch
Definition of soft touch for English Language Learners
: a person who is easily deceived or taken advantage of
Learn More about soft touch
Seen and Heard
What made you want to look up soft touch? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible).


text:
? Place an order in the next
Hours Minutes . Overweight charges may apply to some items.
Not the correct shipping zip code? Update your information below.
Enter a valid zip code
Please select options for this product
Estimated Delivery for
Change Shipping Destination
(based on 2 reviews)
Reviewed by 2 customers
Displaying reviews 1-2
Back to top
(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)
By ben
from Syracuse,ny
About Me Avid Cyclist
Best Uses
Comments about Nashbar Alloy ZSB 400mm Seatpost:
This simple design makes precise seat angle adjustments easy. Why others haven't co opted this idea is beyond me but at least Nashbar offers it. Price is right as well
Bottom Line Yes, I would recommend this to a friend
Was this review helpful? Yes / No
- You may also flag this review
(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)
I would buy more
By ekoutdoorz
from Sidney Nebraska
I ordered this seatpost as a direct replacement for the much too short 300mm post that came on my new 2015 Fuji Sportif 1.5D (size 61 frame) endurance road bike. It arrived promptly and fit perfectly. I was very pleased that the two bolt micro adjust seat clamp matches the original very closely and is likewise a joy to fine tune. Those who know what a pain a single bolt seat clamp can be can appreciate that. I can now ride at my correct seat height without worrying about damaging the bike. It does have a little offset close to most o.e.m. posts, not a true "zero offset" like the description says.
Item No. »
We Make Shopping Safe, Secure and Easy
© 2017 Nashbar. All Rights Reserved.
Return to Mobile


text:
i got a gastric sleeve done and lost weight, but something that buggs me is that when i go out people that dont know about it think im starving myself, when im not. i would tell my date i got a surgury done but would that make him think of me any differently?
Most Helpful Guy
As long as she's healthy and enjoying herself, and she appreciates that sometimes I really need to get down with my eating, then I it's all good to me.00|00|0


text:
Physics tutor
I specialised in particle and biological physics at Oxford University. I have experience teaching the following at
undergraduate level: quantum mechanics, special relativity, electromagnetism & fluid dynamics.
As part of my teaching I often use Matlab & Python to illustrate physical ideas graphically. I have also taught
introductory programming in these languages.


text:
Please be aware you are required to wear a balaclava under your helmet whilst racing. You can purchase
a disposable balaclava from us when you arrive for just 50p, a reusable cotton balaclava for £3.50 or
bring your own. WHAT RACE TYPES CAN
Please select a track
Please select race type
Discounted karting sessions cannot be booked online. If you would like to book a
specially discounted event or an event type not listed below please call the team
on 0844 998 0000:
Book two sessions at your favourite track, select a week day or weekend.
Book in advance for a Sunday session with up to half price karting.
Available at all tracks excluding Tower Bridge. Book a half price karting session available every Wednesday before
Available every Sunday and select dates at all tracks, enjoy late night karting
with a guaranteed 50 minutes of track time (48 minutes at Tower Bridge). View dates available to book
Please select Number of adults/Children
All drivers for adult karts (aged 13+ years) must have a minimum inside leg measurement
of 29 inches measured from the crotch to the base of the heal of the shoe. There
is a maximum weight limit of 18.5 stone for all locations and a maximum height limit
of 6ft 4"
You may be unable to race or have additional charges to pay on arrival if the drivers
are not booked into the correct karts.
Drivers under the age of 16 must have an adult over the age of 18 with them to sign them in.
Please select number of children
All drivers for cadet karts (aged 8+ years) must have a minimum inside leg measurement
of 25 inches measured from the crotch to the base of the heal of the shoe.
Please select a valid date
We're on the grid and ready to go


text: Director Yograj Bhat is to direct hero Puneet Rajkumar in his new venture after getting the script ready from producer Rockline Venkatesh. Yograj Bhats previous movie Galipata, in which Ganesh, Raj Krishan, Diganth and Neetha led the pack of stars, continues its dream run in the box office. He has directed four films, among which Galipata is the most prominent. The film is all set to run for a hundred days in many theatres. Meanwhile, Puneet Rajkumar is busy with two films - Vamshi, directed by Prakash Raj and Raj, directed by Prem. He will start working on Yograj Bhats new film once he finishes them.


text:
There are windowboxes and pink checked curtains,
a little garden with shell flowers, and a clock on the wall,
But who lives in a house like this?
A tiny yellow bunny who likes to snuggle by the fire at teatime (and whose alarmingly bulging eyes suggest she might have a thyroid problem)
I made this house as a present for my niece's fifth birthday party. Smalls Tiny and Tall offered lots of advice and sang songs from High School Musical to keep me motivated and stop me running off to do the ironing instead. The birthday girl was very pleased and the other two have been asking for their own versions so I think it must have tiny girl appeal. I had planned lots of embroidery for the garden and to have climbing roses around the door, but that would have involved starting it earlier than two days before party day (and in fact the bunny had no ears or legs until an hour before we drove to the celebrations - hence no time to fix the eyes).
The house is based on a lovely tutorial from UK Lass In US, and the bunny is from Julie's tiny bunny pattern. I see more of both in this household in the near future ... I wish the light had been better, but I had to go with the photos I had since we're heading home before the sun is due out again!