text:
We investigated motor and sensory changes underlying learning of a balance task. Fourteen participants practiced balancing on one leg on a board that could freely rotate in the frontal plane. They performed six, 16-s trials standing on one leg on a stable surface (2 trials without manipulation, 2 with vestibular, and 2 with visual stimulation) and six trials on the balance board before and after a 30-min training. Center of mass (COM) movement, segment, and total angular momenta and board angles were determined. Trials on stable surface were compared with trials after training to assess effects of surface conditions. Trials pretraining and posttraining were compared to assess rapid (between trials pretraining) and slower (before and after training) learning, and sensory manipulation trials were compared with unperturbed trials to assess sensory weighting. COM excursions were larger on the unstable surface but decreased with practice, with the largest improvement over the pretraining trials. Changes in angular momentum contributed more to COM acceleration on the balance board, but with practice this decreased. Visual stimulation increased sway similarly in both surface conditions, while vestibular stimulation increased sway less on the balance board. With practice, the effects of visual and vestibular stimulation increased rapidly. Initially, oscillations of the balance board occurred at 3.5 Hz, which decreased with practice. The initial decrease in sway with practice was associated with upweighting of visual information, while later changes were associated with suppression of oscillations that we suggest are due to too high proprioceptive feedback gains.
- postural control
- sway
- motor learning
- sensory integration
postural balance is maintained by muscle activation patterns that keep the body center of mass (COM) within safe boundaries above the base of support or bring it back above the base of support after perturbations (Nashner 1977; Torres-Oviedo and Ting 2010). While across multiple conditions these activation patterns reflect a consistent set of synergies, i.e., invariant patterns of activation across muscles, task-specific muscle synergies are recruited in addition to the preexisting ones when balance demands are high, as for example in one-legged standing (Torres-Oviedo and Ting 2010). In mechanical terms, these muscle activity patterns control the COM: by shifting the center of pressure of the ground reaction force (COP) within the base of support, by changing the body's angular momentum around the COM, or by creating a new base of support, for example, by stepping or grabbing a hand rail (Hof 2007). Successful balancing is usually defined as the ability to maintain upright body posture without having to step or grab support, so the latter strategy will not be considered here. If balance is controlled by shifting the COP, the body moves more or less as a single segment, often modeled as a single inverted pendulum, rotating around the ankle(s), due to which it has been coined "ankle strategy" (Horak and Nashner 1986). Changing the angular momentum of body segments around the COM involves relative movements of body segments and hence a deviation from inverted pendulum behavior. Given the large movements around the hip in this strategy, it has been coined "hip strategy" (Horak and Nashner 1986). In postural control, multijoint movements appear to be present (Creath et al. 2005; Riemann et al. 2003), and even isolated movements in hip and ankle would require coordinated muscle activity around other joints, as is reflected in the muscle synergies observed (Torres-Oviedo and Ting 2010). Therefore, the terms ankle and hip strategy may be simplifications, but they will be used in the following for brevity.
To generate the appropriate muscle activation patterns to control balance, the central nervous system (CNS) uses feedback from the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular sensory systems (Redfern et al. 2001). Information provided by these modalities is usually consistent. However, in specific conditions, it may be inconsistent and selection or adapted weighting of information is required. This process is called sensory (re-)weighting (Zupan et al. 2002) or sensory (re-)organization (Sober and Sabes 2003).
Training of balance control has been proven to be beneficial in preventing falls in the elderly (Duque et al. 2013; Halvarsson et al. 2013) and decreasing injury risk (Hupperets et al. 2009) and improving sports performance (Cressey et al. 2007) in athletes. Such training commonly involves balancing on an unstable surface like a balance board, foam mat, or gymnastic ball. After initial failures, most people learn to maintain balance on such unstable surfaces, but it is unknown what underlies this improved performance. Changes in motor strategy and changes in sensory weighting may both contribute to this learning process.
Motor Strategy and Support Surface
In balancing on a rigid surface, moments around the ankle joint instantaneously and proportionally change the position of the COP of the ground reaction and therewith cause moments that accelerate the COM (Hof 2007). On an unstable surface, moments around the ankle joint also change the COP position, now by moving (in case of, e.g., a balance board) or deforming (in case of, e.g., a foam mat) the support surface. However, due to the dynamics of the surface, the relation between the ankle moment and the COM acceleration is different than on a rigid surface, with changes in scaling of the effect of changes in ankle moment as well as in the temporal relation between the moment and the resulting COM acceleration. Balancing on an unstable surface might thus be expected to coincide with a shift from the ankle to the hip strategy. Indeed, while the ankle strategy appears to be dominant in the control of normal unperturbed standing, the hip strategy is used more when balancing on narrow supports (Horak and Nashner 1986; Otten 1999) and on compliant surfaces (Patel et al. 2008; Riemann et al. 2003). While it has been suggested that the hip strategy involves movements of the upper body relative to the hip as a single segment (Horak and Nashner 1986; Otten 1999), the actual movement patterns may be more complicated and the contribution of different segments to the change in angular momentum has to our knowledge not been studied.
Motor Strategy and Training
Training possibly also induces changes in the mechanical strategy to control balance. Honegger et al. (2013) reported that tightrope walkers when balancing in tandem stance on a foam mat showed more trunk and arm movements than untrained participants, which may indicate that the trained participants used the hip strategy more. However, to our knowledge, direct effects of training on motor strategy in balancing have not been reported.
Sensory Weighting and Support Surface
With respect to the use of sensory information for balance control, on a rigid surface, different sensory modalities usually provide consistent information on body orientation relative to gravity. While standing on an unstable surface, information derived from the somatosensory system becomes ambiguous, because changes in length of muscles in the lower extremity are not coherent with changes in body orientation relative to gravity (Kiers et al. 2012; Nashner 1982). Also the input into the somatosensory system arising from the contact with the support surface is altered (Pasma et al. 2012). Larger disturbances of upright standing posture by surface manipulations have been associated with upweighting of vestibular information (Maurer et al. 2006; van der Kooij and Peterka 2011) and visual information (Assländer and Peterka 2014; Fransson et al. 2007; Polastri et al. 2012) relative to somatosensory information. Consequently, on an unstable surface, artificial input into the somatosensory system has a smaller effect than on a solid surface (Ivanenko et al. 1999; Kiers et al. 2012; Trimble and Koceja 2001), while the effects of blocking visual input (Andreopoulou et al. 2015; Fransson et al. 2007) and of vestibular stimulation (Andreopoulou et al. 2015) are larger. All in all, there is clear evidence for sensory reweighting for balance control in unstable environments.
Sensory Weighting and Training
Balance control training also appears to coincide with reweighting of sensory information. Full-time ballet dance students showed briefer vestibular reflexes than controls, and this was associated with structural changes in the vestibular cerebellum (Nigmatullina et al. 2015). Well-trained gymnasts have been reported to show smaller effects of closing the eyes on balance control than untrained participants (Robertson et al. 1994; Vuillerme et al. 2001). Although such effects appear not to be very consistent (Asseman et al. 2008; Lamoth et al. 2009), they do suggest a reduced weighting of visual information after gymnastics training. However, these studies do not necessarily indicate that gymnasts use visual information less when it is available, but rather that they can compensate better for its absence. Gautier et al. (2008) bypassed this limitation by using a virtual optic flow to manipulate visual information. They found smaller effects of this flow on head movement velocity in gymnasts than in untrained controls, hence providing more direct evidence of reduced weighting of visual information in gymnasts. Gautier et al. (2008) concluded, however, that their results may still indicate that gymnasts, rather than having downweighted visual information, are better able to exploit multimodal information to compensate for nonveridical visual input. More importantly, gymnastic training involves much more than dealing with unstable surfaces. It would therefore be useful to assess effects of training to balance on an unstable surface more directly. Studies that have done so have shown decreases in proprioceptive reflex gains after balance training (Gruber et al. 2007; Keller et al. 2012; Taube et al. 2007b; Trimble and Koceja 2001), suggesting increased reliance on visual and/or vestibular information for balance control.
Aims and Hypotheses
In summary, balancing on an unstable surface may elicit changes in motor strategy and changes in the use of sensory information, compared with balancing on a rigid surface. With training these adaptations are likely to become more pronounced. The aim of the present study was to comprehensively characterize balance control on an unstable surface. This was achieved in multiple steps. First, we investigated differences between standing on one leg on a rigid vs. an unstable surface. We compared motor strategies used and the influence of perturbations of sensory information between surface conditions. We then studied rapid learning effects by comparing repeated trials on the unstable surface. Subsequently, the subjects trained on the unstable surface for 30 min and we determined long-term effects on motor strategies and on the influence of sensory perturbations. We hypothesized that participants rely more on the hip strategy, involving larger trunk movements relative to the stance leg, on the unstable surface than on the rigid surface. In addition, we aimed to provide insight in the movement pattern underlying the hip strategy or the control of COM through changes in angular momentum. Finally, we hypothesized that vestibular and visual feedback would be upweighted on the unstable compared with the rigid surface and that training would improve performance, coinciding with a further shift in motor strategy and upweighting of visual and vestibular feedback.
Fourteen healthy participants, five males and nine females (age: 22.8 yr; SD: 2.2; weight: 67.6 kg; SD: 10.1; height: 175.6 cm; SD: 7.6), participated in this study. Exclusion criteria were known neurological disorders, vestibular impairments, or any impairment in the lower extremity. Also, people who practiced sports that specifically challenge balance were excluded, as this could limit training gains in the experiment (Kiers et al. 2013).
Ethics Statement
All participants provided written informed consent and the protocol had been approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Human Movement Sciences of the VU University Amsterdam (ECB 2013-25).
The unstable surface was created with a balance board consisting of a wooden board mounted on a section of a cylinder, creating an unstable support in the frontal plane. The radius of the cylinder was 24 cm and the height of the surface of the board above the point of contact was 18.5 cm (Fig. 1A). Handrails were placed such that participants could grab one of the rails in case of balance loss.
An Optotrak camera (Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada) recorded the 3D-positions of 21 LED markers on the body and two on the lateral ends of the board at a sample rate of 300 samples/s. The markers were placed on the frontal aspects of the ankles, knees, hips, shoulders, elbows, wrists, and forehead. Three markers were placed over the elbows and wrists to increase the probability that at least one marker would be visible at all times.
EMG of the main hip abductor and adductor muscles was measured, as these are thought to play a key role in balance control in the frontal plane (Otten 1999; Rietdyk et al. 1999; Winter et al. 1996). Pairs of surface Ag-AgCl EMG electrodes were attached to the skin over the muscle bellies of the m. adductor longus and m. gluteus medius after shaving and cleaning of the skin. EMG data were sampled at 2,000 sample/s (Porti 17, TMSi; Enschede, The Netherlands; 22 bits AD conversion after 20 times amplification, input impedance >1012 Ω, CMRR >90 dB for the relevant range of frequencies).
The weighting of vestibular input was assessed by galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) by a linear isolated stimulator (Stmisola, Biopac, Goleta CA) set to produce a sinusoidally alternating current with a 4.5-mA amplitude and a frequency of 0.125 Hz through electrodes over the mastoid processes. The weighting of visual input was assessed using a moving scenery created with a data projector. Alternating vertical black and white bars (0.3-m width) were projected on a screen (2.5 by 1.5 m) on the wall 4 m in front of the participant and moved horizontally and sinusoidally at 0.125 Hz with an amplitude of 2.4 m in the trials with visual manipulation.
Experimental Procedure
A measurement consisted of 18 trials, 6 in each of 3 conditions (rigid surface, unstable surface before training, unstable surface after training). For every trial, participants were instructed to stand as still as possible on their preferred leg, with their arms abducted 90° and the unsupported leg hanging free (Fig. 1B). Also, they were asked to look at the middle of the projection screen in front of them. Every trial lasted 16 s. Trial duration was kept this short because pilot studies indicated that subjects starting grabbing the support at an increasing rate during longer trials, reportedly related to fatigue and associated balance loss. In between trials on stable and unstable surfaces, subjects performed two practice trials on the unstable surface of 16 s and the total period between measurements on stable and unstable surfaces was ∼5 min. Rest periods between trials within each block of six trials were given to prevent fatigue and restart measurements, each break lasted 20–30 s. Pilot measurements indicated a substantial learning effect within the first trials on the balance board. To avoid frequent balance loss during the measurements and to attenuate but not efface the fast learning effects, participants were allowed to practice standing on the balance board before the experiment only twice for 16 s and were not allowed to stand on the balance board in between trials.
During each trial kinematic data were recorded continuously. In the first trial of each set of three (Fig. 1B), EMG data were recorded and no manipulation was applied. Subsequently, the two sensory manipulations were applied, the sequence of which was balanced over participants but stayed the same within participants. These manipulations were used to assess the weighting of vestibular and visual information by comparison to the unperturbed trial. To assess fast learning effects, these three trials were repeated once within each condition. In the stable condition, which was performed first, participants balanced on one leg on a rigid platform, flush with the floor of the laboratory; in the other conditions (before and after training) they were standing on the balance board described above. After the first six trials on the board (2 repetitions of 3 trials), participants had 30 min to practice balancing on the board. No instructions or feedback were given, but it was made sure that participants were actively training during this period. Subsequently, the six trials on the balance board were repeated once more.
Data Analysis
During each trial, the three-dimensional coordinates of LED markers on anatomical landmarks and on the balance board were recorded. For every trial, the marker that was within the view of the camera for most of the samples for each wrist and elbow was chosen for analysis. Missing samples were interpolated by cubic spline interpolation. Based on the frontal plane positions of the thirteen body segments and an anthropometrical model (Zatsiorsky 2002), the times series of the frontal position of the body COM was calculated. The position of the hands and feet were extrapolated, assuming fixed wrist and ankle angles. The total excursion of the COM in the mediolateral direction during one trial, or path, was used as a measure of performance and was calculated as: (1)
in which CȮMy is the mediolateral velocity of the COM. Given the standardized length of the data series, this measure is equivalent to the mean absolute velocity of the COM. It was used to quantify performance in view of its high reliability and sensitivity as a measure of postural sway (Cholewicki et al. 2000; Raymakers et al. 2005; van Dieen et al. 2010). The time series of COM acceleration in the left-right direction was calculated as the second derivative of the COM time series. In addition, the orientation of the balance board relative to the horizontal was determined.
The EMG signals of the m. adductor longus and m. gluteus medius were band-stop filtered (4th order Butterworth, with cut-off frequencies of 49.5 and 50.5 Hz), high-pass filtered at 10 Hz (2nd order Butterworth) to remove movement artifacts and then rectified and smoothed (bidirectionally applied 2nd order Butterworth filter with a cut-off frequency of 5 Hz). The means and the coefficients of variation of the linear envelope were calculated to obtain measures of the level of activity and of the variance in activity of both muscles. Pearson's correlation coefficient between EMG time series of the antagonistic muscle pair was calculated to assess whether reciprocal activation (negative correlations) or coactivation (positive correlations) was present.
Frequency domain analyses of kinematic data and EMG linear envelopes were performed using Welch's averaged modified periodogram method, with Hamming windows of 1,500 samples overlapping for 50% and with 6,000 points fast Fourier transform to obtain a frequency resolution of 0.05 Hz. The resulting power spectra were normalized to total power to allow straightforward comparison of the of the distribution of power irrespective of the total power of the signals.
Angular momenta of the total body and of individual segments around the body COM were calculated using the following equation (Elftman 1939): (2)
in which H is total angular momentum, n is the number of segments, hj is angular momentum of segment j, Ij is the segment's moment of inertia relative to its center of gravity (estimated based on Zatsiorsky 2002), ωj is the segment's angular velocity, rj is the position vector of the segment's COM mj relative to the body's COM, and vj is the velocity vector of the segment's COM relative to the body's COM. The first derivatives of the angular momenta in the frontal plane (Ḣ and ḣ) were calculated.
Ignoring changes in the base of support by grabbing the handrail, the contributions of the ankle strategy and hip strategy to COM acceleration are given by (Hof 2007): (3)
in which m is body mass, COMz is the vertical position of the COM, is acceleration of the COM in the mediolateral direction, t is time, g is the gravitational acceleration, COMy is the mediolateral position of the center of pressure, and COMy is the mediolateral position of the COM. Here the first part of the right-hand term refers to the ankle strategy and Ḣ, the second part, is proportional to the ML COM acceleration induced by the hip strategy. Root mean squared (RMS) values of the derivatives of the angular momentum of the arms (after summation over upper arm, forearm, and hand), legs (after summation, over thigh, shank and foot), head, and trunk (ḣ) were calculated. To assess how these segments contributed to the total Ḣ. RMS values of ḣ were expressed relative to the RMS of Ḣ.
The contribution of the hip strategy to balance control was quantified as: (4)
in which i is sample number and n the total number of samples. The denominator in this equation represents the total amount of acceleration of the COM and the numerator represents the amount of acceleration of the COM caused by changes in angular momentum. The ratio thus can be thought of as the contribution of angular momentum changes to COM acceleration. This ratio can exceed 100 when a negative covariance exists between the effect of angular momentum changes and the effect of changes in COP. Note that the second component contributing to COM acceleration, i.e., shifting the COP relative to the COM, was not measured directly, as its contribution can be inferred from Eq. 3. In addition, when standing on the balance board, COP location is directly related to the measured angle of the board.
To further assess the coordinative strategy underlying the generation of Ḣ, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the time series of ḣ of arms, legs, trunk, and head. PCA was first performed on the data of each trial and participant separately, subsequently on data pooled over trials per participant and finally over all data pooled. The number of principal components to retain was selected based on the eigenvalues, and varimax rotation of selected components was applied to facilitate interpretation of the structure of the data.
All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 20 (IBM Software, Armonk, NY).
To compare balance performance and motor strategy in one-legged balancing between rigid and unstable surfaces, the mean values over the two trials without manipulations on rigid surface were compared with the mean values of the two trials without manipulations on the balance board after training, using paired tests. We used posttraining trials for the surface condition comparison, as the initial trials on the unstable surface showed rapid changes in motor behavior. Paired t-tests were used, except for EMG data, which were clearly nonnormally distributed and were therefore tested using a Wilcoxon-matched pairs test.
To evaluate training effects, we used two-way repeated measures ANOVAs to test for effects of trial to assess fast learning over repeated trials and for effects of the training period to assess more gradual skill acquisition. In view of their nonnormal distribution, EMG data were tested with Wilcoxon matched pairs tests, comparing adjacent trials, i.e., pretraining trials 1 and 2, pretraining trial 2 and posttraining trial 1, and posttraining trials 1 and 2.
To compare the effects of sensory manipulations between surface conditions, we again used the average values over the trials on the rigid surface and the trials on the unstable surface posttraining. We used two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with as dependent variable the COM mediolateral path length and as independent variables surface and either vestibular or visual manipulation. In addition, because the unstable surface would be expected to amplify effects of any perturbation including the sensory manipulations applied, the relative effects of the sensory manipulations were compared between surface conditions using paired t-tests. To assess effects of training on sensory weighting, three-way ANOVAs with sensory manipulations, trial, and training as independent variables were performed.
Finally, associations between changes in performance over trials and changes in the motor strategy used and in the effects of the sensory manipulations over trials were assessed by means of Pearson's correlation coefficients.
Balance Performance
In the stable surface condition without sensory manipulations, none of the participants touched the support rail, while one or more participants made brief contact with the rail in all other conditions (Table 1). The median number of contacts was zero for all conditions on the stable surface; it increased in the first set of pretraining trials to decrease again over subsequent trials.
Figure 2 gives a typical example of the COM trajectories and the angle of the balance board of a single participant in the trials without sensory manipulations. Clearly, COM excursion was larger on the unstable surface, especially in the first trial before training. Unanticipated, the COM displacement showed an oscillatory pattern at a relatively high frequency that was more readily apparent in the COM acceleration and its normalized power spectrum and was also present in the time series and spectrum of the board angle. Since the board angle is directly related to the mediolateral position of the COP, which in turn drives COM acceleration (Eq. 3), ankle moments driving the board oscillations can be considered causal in this relation. The peak in the power spectrum was found at ∼3.5 Hz and was still clearly visible in the second trial without sensory manipulation before training but not after training. Also, the frequency of the peak appeared to decrease slightly over trials. The oscillations in the COM acceleration illustrated in Fig. 2 were clearly observable in all participants, albeit at slightly different frequencies. Therefore, we calculated the relative power of the COM acceleration and board angle between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz and compared this between conditions.
Effects of surface condition on balance performance.
To assess effects of surface condition, standing on a rigid surface was compared with standing on the unstable surface after training (Fig. 3, bar clusters at left and right). As expected, the mediolateral COM path was significantly longer on the unstable surface than on the rigid surface (Fig. 3A, P < 0.001) illustrating the more demanding nature of balancing on the board. The relative power of the COM acceleration between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz was significantly higher on the unstable surface compared with the stable surface (Fig. 3B, P = 0.033).
Effects of training on balance performance.
We tested for effects of trial to assess fast learning effects over repeated trials and for effects of 30 min of training to assess more gradual training effects (Fig. 3, bar clusters at middle and right). Performance improved with training on both short and long time scales, as evidenced by significant main effects of trial (P = 0.003) and training (P < 0.001) and a significant interaction effect (P < 0.001), with a significant post hoc difference between pretraining trials 1 and 2 (P = 0.003) and a borderline effect between pretraining trial 2 and posttraining trial 1 (P = 0.053) but not between posttraining trials (Fig. 3A).
For the relative power of COM acceleration at 2.5–4.5 Hz, the effect of training was significant (Fig. 3B, P < 0.001) while the effect of trial (P = 0.111) was not. However, a significant interaction was found (P = 0.001), with a decrease between trials before training and a slight increase after training. Post hoc differences between all adjacent trials were significant (P = 0.009, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). For the relative power of the board angle, significant main effects of training (Fig. 3C, P = 0.009) and trial (P < 0.001) and a significant interaction were found (P = 0.001), with the pattern of change similar to that observed for the relative power of the COM acceleration at 2.5–4.5 Hz. Again post hoc differences between all adjacent trials were significant (P = 0.006, P < 0.001, and P = 0.043, respectively).
Muscle Activity
Activity of the adductor longus and gluteus medius muscles consisted of tonic activity with superimposed phasic bursts as illustrated in Fig. 4. Visual inspection suggested that these bursts sometimes reflected reciprocal activation and sometimes reflected coactivation of the antagonistic muscle pair measured. Accordingly, correlations between the EMG linear envelopes of both muscles were overall low; coefficients of correlation ranged from −0.69 to +0.66 with 77% having an absolute value <0.3. In all but one of the participants, the EMG data in the first trials on the unstable surface showed oscillations at the same frequency as observed in the kinematics of the COM and the balance board.
Effects of surface condition on muscle activity.
Muscle activity was in general higher on the unstable than on the stable surface after training, with adductor longus activity having a 40% higher median (P = 0.026) and gluteus medius activity having a 34% higher median (P = 0.003) on the unstable surface. The coefficient of variation of muscle activity was not different between surface conditions for the adductor longus but was slightly higher on the unstable surface for gluteus medius (median 24 vs. 25%, P = 0.048). The relative power of the EMG linear envelopes between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz was not different between the stable condition and the unstable condition after training. Correlations between EMG linear envelopes of both muscles were equally low in both conditions.
Effects of training on muscle activity.
Muscle activity of the adductor longus and gluteus medius decreased significantly between the two pretraining trials by 36% (P = 0.005) and 26% (P = 0.016), respectively, but did not change significantly between later trials (post 1 vs. post 2). The coefficient of variation of the EMG linear envelopes decreased between pretraining trials, from a median of 42 to 25% for the adductor longus and from 41 to 27% for the gluteus medius (P = 0.008 for both muscles), and decreased from 27 to 26% between pretraining 2 and posttraining 1 for gluteus medius (P = 0.030). Between the pretraining trials, the relative power between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz decreased not significantly for adductor longus (from 22 to 20%, P = 0.094) and significantly for gluteus medius (from 50 to 34%, P = 0.009) and decreased further between pretraining 2 and posttraining 1 for gluteus medius alone (from 34 to 26% P = 0.006).
Angular Momentum Control
Typical examples of the time series of the derivatives of the total angular momentum (Ḣ) and of the angular momenta of the separate segments (ḣ) are presented in Fig. 5. Angular momenta were clearly more variable in the trials on the unstable surface compared with the trials on the rigid surface, especially in the first trial on the unstable surface. Variations in ḣ of the arms, head, and trunk occurred in phase, while the leg movements appeared to be more independent. The ḣ of the nonstance or free leg was relatively high in all trials. The derivative of the stance leg angular momentum had a relatively high-frequency content, most likely associated with the oscillations of the balance board described above. However, the power of Ḣ in the frequency band concerned (2.5–4.5 Hz) was below 6% of the total power across all conditions and participants.
The large effect of the legs on Ḣ was confirmed at the group level by comparison of the relative RMS values of ḣ between segments (Fig. 6). Note, in particular for the stance leg this is also the result of movements of the COM relative to the leg. The sum of the relative RMS values over segments usually exceeded 100% indicating that counterrotations of segments occurred. The effects of the segments on Ḣ were quite consistent over conditions, with some notable exceptions, which will be reported in Effects of surface condition on angular momentum control and Effects of training on angular momentum control.
The PCA performed on the time series of ḣ confirmed the consistency of how angular momentum control was used across conditions and even across participants. When applying PCA per participant and per trial, three modes accounted for on average 93% (SD 3%) of the total variance in ḣ. With PCA on data per participant across conditions, three modes accounted for on average 91 SD 2% of total variance in ḣ and finally when applying PCA over all participants and trials, three modes accounted for 90% of the total variance in ḣ. Varimax rotation of the PCA results showed that arms, head, and trunk covaried, while both legs moved largely independently (Fig. 7). The independent variations in angular momentum of the free, nonstance leg (see Fig. 7, factor 3), relative to the trunk and more cranial segments, indicates that the label "hip strategy" does not adequately reflect the motor strategy used.
Effects of surface condition on angular momentum control.
Between surface conditions, i.e., comparing the average over the two rigid surface conditions to that over the two posttraining trials, the relative effects of segments on Ḣ changed as indicated by a lower relative RMS value of ḣ for the trunk on the unstable surface (P = 0.037) and higher values for the stance leg (P = 0.012) and ipsilateral arm (P = 0.048; Fig. 6).
Confirming our hypothesis, the effect of Ḣ on the acceleration of the body COM was significantly larger on the unstable surface than on the rigid surface (Fig. 8, bar clusters at right and left, P = 0.011).
Effects of training on angular momentum control.
With trial and training, effects of the stance leg (P = 0.012 and P = 0.001), swing leg (P = 0.028 and P = 0.049), and trunk (P = 0.025 and p 0.003) on Ḣ increased (Fig. 6). The relative contributions of the segments were overall lower in the first trial pretraining, which implies less counterrotations of segments and may imply more strict coordination between segments.
The contribution of the hip strategy to COM acceleration decreased significantly with training (Fig. 8, bar clusters at middle and right, P < 0.001) and trial (P = 0.002) and was affected by their interaction (P = 0.049). The interaction indicated a larger decrease between pretraining trials than between posttraining trials. On post hoc paired comparisons of adjacent trials, only the first two trials were significantly different (P = 0.004).
Sensory Weighting
Figure 9 illustrates the effect of the sensory manipulations in the stable and unstable surface conditions (after training). As can be seen, the sensory manipulations induced sway at the frequency of stimulation in both conditions.
At the group level, both sensory manipulations significantly increased the excursion of the COM (Figs. 10 and 11, P < 0.001, for both manipulations).
Sensory weighting and surface condition.
In contrast with our hypothesis, the effect of vestibular manipulation was smaller on the unstable surface after training than on the stable surface, as evidenced by a significant interaction of surface and vestibular manipulation (Fig. 10A; P < 0.001) and by a significantly smaller relative effect of vestibular manipulation on the unstable surface than on the stable surface (Fig. 10B, P < 0.001).
The effect of visual manipulation was not significantly dependent on the surface condition, i.e., the interaction effect was not significant (Fig. 11A; P = 0.111) nor was the difference in relative effect (Fig. 11B; P = 0.825).
Sensory weighting and training.
The effect of vestibular manipulation was dependent on training and trial, as evidenced by a significant three-way interaction (Fig. 10A, P = 0.044). We therefore compared adjacent trials in terms of absolute and relative effects of vestibular manipulation. Between the pretraining trials, a nonsignificant difference was found for the absolute effect of vestibular manipulation (P = 0.080) and a significant effect for the relative effect (P = 0.015), with a smaller effect in the first trial. No differences were found between the last trial pretraining and the first trial posttraining, while there were nonsignificant differences between the posttraining trials in absolute (P = 0.095) and relative (P = 0.063) effect of vestibular manipulation, with a smaller effect in the final trial.
Also, the effect of visual manipulation was dependent on training and trial as indicated by a three-way interaction (Fig. 11A, P = 0.011). Both absolute (P = 0.010) and relative (P = 0.004) effects of visual manipulation were different only between the pretraining trials, with the smaller effect on the first trial.
Associations Between Training Effects
As reported in Effects of training on balance performance, performance improved with training on both short and long time scales as evidenced by significant main effects of trial and training on the COM excursion. We had hypothesized that improvements in performance would be related to changes in either the motor strategy, reflected by the contribution of the hip strategy to COM acceleration and/or to upweighting of vestibular and/or visual information. To test these hypotheses, we correlated changes in performance between both pretraining trials and between the last pretraining trial and the first posttraining trial to concomitant changes in the contribution of Ḣ and in the effects of the sensory manipulations. In view of the unanticipated effects detected on the oscillations of the balance board, we performed the same analysis for this variable as a potential cause of improvements in performance. For changes between pretraining trials, the coefficient of correlation between decrease in COM excursion and the increase in effect of visual manipulation was significant (R = −0.80, Fig. 12). For the changes over the 30-min training period, the correlation between the improvement in performance and the decrease of the relative power of the board angle between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz was significant (R = 0.73, Fig. 12). These results indicate that the fast initial improvements are mainly due to upweighting of visual information, while the slower progress achieved over the 30-min training period is mainly due to suppression of the oscillatory ankle and balance board movements.
The aims of this study were to assess motor strategies and use of sensory information in balancing on one leg on either a rigid or an unstable surface and to assess the changes that occur with learning to balance on the unstable surface. On the unstable surface, we expected participants to rely more on the hip strategy to control their COM than on the stable surface. In addition, we hypothesized that vestibular and visual manipulations would have stronger effects on the unstable compared with the rigid surface and that training would induce an increase in the use of the hip strategy and of visual and vestibular feedback. Balancing on one leg on the unstable surface was clearly more difficult than on the rigid surface, as evidenced by increased COM excursions and higher activity of the hip abductor and adductor muscles. Over the pretraining trials and the 30-min training period, participants showed a substantial decrease in COM excursions, while hip muscle activity decreased, indicating decreased effort. The largest part of the improvement in performance was achieved over the first set of six trials, which each lasted 16 s only. As hypothesized, an increase in the contribution of the changes in angular momentum to COM accelerations was found on the unstable surface, but in contrast with our hypothesis, with further training, the contribution of angular momentum changes to balance control decreased. Also in contrast with our hypothesis, weighting of visual information was not different between the stable surface and the unstable surface posttraining, while the vestibular information was even downweighted on the unstable surface compared with the stable surface. With practice, however, the effect of visual and vestibular manipulations increased rapidly, suggesting upweighting of these sensory modalities relative to the initial trials on the unstable surface. In addition, in the unstable condition, oscillatory movements of the balance board were seen, which, as will be discussed below, may be due to too high gains of proprioceptive feedback used to generate ankle moments. These oscillations disappeared with practice, suggesting downweighting of proprioceptive signals with learning to balance on the unstable surface. The improvement in balance performance over the initial trials was correlated with the increase in the effect of visual manipulation only, whereas the improvement in balance performance over the 30-min training period was correlated with the decrease in the relative power of the oscillations of the balance board only.
Motor Strategy
To our knowledge, this study is the first to provide insight into how the hip strategy, or more exactly, variations in angular momentum contribute to the control of mediolateral COM accelerations in balancing on one leg. It was found that this strategy was used in a consistent manner across trials and participants, as evidenced by the PCA and the limited effects of the experimental conditions on the relative contributions of the segments to total angular momentum. Previously, it has been suggested that the hip strategy in single-leg stance involves movements around the hip joint of the stance leg, with the upper body and the other leg moving as a single segment (Otten 1999). Here we showed that trunk momenta were to some extent inversely correlated with those of the stance leg and that the angular momenta of trunk, head, and arms were positively correlated. However, independent variations occurred in angular momentum of the free, nonstance leg, relative to the upper body, indicating a contribution by hip movements in the nonstance leg. Similarly for COM control in the anteroposterior direction, it has been shown that the hip strategy in fact involves rotations around multiple joints (Riemann et al. 2003) and consequently the label hip strategy may be a misnomer also from a kinematic perspective.
The hip and ankle strategy are not extremes of a behavioral continuum but rather two coexisting strategies used for balance control (Creath et al. 2005), which are mechanically independent (Hof 2007). In line with this, the COM accelerations were not fully accounted for by angular momentum changes. In fact, in the initial trials on the unstable surface, the two strategies co-existed and produced at least partially opposite effects on the COM, leading to the estimated effect of the hip strategy exceeding 100%. We suggest that changes in angular momentum may be used to control balance specifically when control actions exerted through ankle torques are inadequate. This would be in line with the dominance of the ankle strategy in less challenging conditions, as found here and in previous studies (Creath et al. 2005; Patel et al. 2008).
The PCA revealed independent contributions of the stance leg, of the swing leg, and of all other segments combined to the total angular momentum. Angular momentum changes of the stance leg are in part coupled to ankle torques and in part to movements of the COM relative to the leg and thus could be assumed not to be part of the hip strategy. This is confirmed by the negative covariance of the angular momentum of the stance leg with the other segments, especially the trunk (Fig. 7) and by the fact that the angular momentum of the stance leg reflected the high-frequency oscillations of the balance board in the initial conditions on this unstable surface (Figs. 2 and 5). Angular momentum of the other segments covaried positively, but occasional independent variations in angular momentum of the nonstance leg occurred, which we suggest are used to apply large and fast corrections in case of impending balance loss (Fig. 13). Future studies could address the question whether the use of the free leg to control balance is related to recruitment of muscle synergies that were shown to be used in more challenging balancing tasks only (Torres-Oviedo and Ting 2010).
Motor strategy and surface condition.
On the unstable surface, the stance leg contributed slightly but significantly more to the total angular momentum than on the rigid surface, which could be due to the fact that the stance leg could move with the support surface and that large COM movements relative to the stance leg occurred. Also, the ipsilateral arm contributed slightly more, suggesting some covariance of the ipsilateral extremities, which was, however, not strong as it did not show in the results of the PCA.
As hypothesized and in line with previous literature (Creath et al. 2005; Otten 1999; Patel et al. 2008; Riemann et al. 2003), we observed an increase of the effect of the hip strategy, i.e., of changes in the body's angular momentum, on the mediolateral COM acceleration, when standing on the unstable surface. It cannot be ascertained that the changes in angular momentum were corrective. The COM acceleration represents the sum of corrective actions and perturbations of balance and these cannot be separated without imposing known perturbations, well exceeding the amplitude of naturally occurring perturbations. However, especially in the pretraining trials on the unstable surface, the RMS derivative of the angular momentum exceeded that of the COM acceleration, indicating that the hip and ankle strategies had opposing effects. It seems that in these cases angular momentum changes were used to correct accelerations arising from the ankle strategy, which appeared disruptive to balance given their oscillatory nature.
Oscillations between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz in board angle and COM acceleration occurred, in the pretraining trials and to a lesser extent in the post training trials on the unstable surface. To our knowledge such oscillations have not been described before, but they appear to be similar to oscillations that have anecdotally been reported occur in novices attempting to stand on a slackline (Keller et al. 2012). These oscillations can be observed in the COM position time series but are more readily apparent in the acceleration, due to the fact that these relatively high frequency components have a lower power in the position signal than in its second derivative, the acceleration signal. Mechanical considerations show that oscillations of the board orientation are causal in this chain of events, as tilting the board causes the COP to shift sideward and the distance between COM and COP causes a proportional COM acceleration (Hof 2007).
Depending on gain and delay, feedback loops can cause oscillatory behavior. Since both the gain and the phase (delay) introduced by the relation between ankle moments and COP position are dependent on the geometry and the dynamics of the unstable object, the ankle strategy needs to be adapted when standing on this object. Apparently, participants were not completely successful in doing so, especially not during the initial trials before training.
An oscillatory pattern was also visible in the EMG linear envelopes during the early trials on the balance board. This may indicate coordinated activation of hip and ankle muscles, as would be required to obtain single inverted pendulum behavior, or in other words, a pure ankle strategy. Alternatively, given the fact that stance leg, thigh, and trunk movements occurred almost in counterphase, the oscillatory hip muscle activity could be generated to produce hip moments driving upper body angular momentum changes to counteract ankle actions. However, since the relative power of the derivative of the total angular momentum between 2.5 and 4.5 Hz was below 6% in all conditions this appears unlikely. Mechanical simulations suggest that stance leg hip abduction and adduction moments are crucial for balance control in one-legged stance, especially when support conditions require the use of changes in angular momentum to control COM acceleration (Otten 1999). The phasic bursts in EMG data collected and the much higher variability of EMG amplitudes in the pretraining trials on the unstable surface may reflect such modulations in hip moments. Future studies should address the coordination between muscles around multiple joints to understand how muscle activity is organized to control COM accelerations in the frontal plane when balancing on one leg.
Motor strategy and training.
In contrast with our hypothesis, we found a gradual decrease in the contribution of the hip strategy over trials. This would fit with a preference for the ankle strategy and the use of the hip strategy for control when the ankle strategy is inadequate, due to high demands or erroneous control actions. Less corrective actions by changing angular momentum are needed when the ankle strategy is used more appropriately after learning the changed transfer function between ankle torques and COM accelerations. The increase of the ratios of the RMS of the segment angular momenta and the total angular momentum after the initial trials on the unstable surface (Fig. 6) indicates a movement pattern with more counterrotations. This coincided with a decrease in the total angular momentum and its contribution to COM accelerations (Fig. 8). This may reflect less coordinated movement of the individual segments, in line with reduced use of these movements as a strategy to control balance.
The use of the ankle strategy appeared to change with practice, as oscillations of the balance board and the COM were attenuated, indicative of a decreasing feedback gain. Also, the frequency of oscillations appeared to decrease over trials, again indicative of a reduced gain. However, the frequency of the peaks could not be identified with sufficient certainty in posttraining trials, so we refrained from quantitative analysis.
When a novel task in an unstable environment is learned, the central nervous system has to find a motor strategy that reduces errors and yet is energetically efficient (Mitrovic et al. 2010). Over trials and training muscle activity significantly decreased. These results match the results of studies on motor learning in response to environmental challenges in other tasks, for example, in making straight arm-movements under unstable conditions (Franklin et al. 2003). In the latter study, as in the present study, exposure to the unstable environment initially caused an increase in muscle activity, which has been interpreted as an attempt to reduce the kinematic error by increasing joint impedance (Franklin et al. 2007; Selen et al. 2006). With practice, as motor control becomes more accurate, muscle activity decreased, presumably minimizing energetic costs. In the present study, both the mean muscle activity and its coefficient of variation decreased with practice. While decreases in tonic activity, reflected in the decreased mean activity observed here, could be related to decreased hip joint impedance, changes in phasic activity, as reflected in the coefficient of variation, are likely related to decreased use of hip moments to generate changes in angular momentum.
Sensory Weighting
In the present study, we used vestibular and visual manipulations to evaluate to what extent these sensory modalities were used for balance control. Both manipulations increased COM excursions in the frontal plane as intended, and during the manipulations COM movement occurred predominantly at the frequency of the input signals (Fig. 9). It should be noted that the magnitudes of the effects of the vestibular and visual manipulations cannot be compared, since the amplitudes of the input signals were not scaled.
Sensory weighting and surface condition.
We hypothesized that vestibular and visual manipulations would have stronger effects on the unstable surface than on the rigid surface. However, a smaller effect of vestibular manipulation and no change in effect of visual manipulation were found. Ceiling effects are not a likely explanation for this finding, because COM displacements were larger in the pretraining trials than in the posttraining trials used for this comparison, and because balance loss was not more common on the unstable surface after training than on the rigid surface.
We suggest that participants increased proprioceptive feedback gains when first standing on the unstable surface, giving rise to oscillatory behavior when performing this novel and challenging balancing task (c.f. Davis et al. 2011; Horslen and Carpenter 2011), concomitant with downweighting of vestibular and visual information. Interestingly, oscillations increased and the effects of vestibular manipulation and visual stimulation tended to decrease between the posttraining trials. It could be that exposure to the manipulations led to some downweighting again of vestibular and visual information relative to proprioceptive information.
The decrease in GVS effects at the unstable surface may also have been due to the fact that head movements were in part self-initiated to generate changes in body angular momentum. A study in primates indicated that vestibular input arising from self-initiated movement is suppressed (Carriot et al. 2013). However, the information arising from the GVS did not arise from but merely coincided with self-initiated movements in the unstable surface condition.
Previous studies showed smaller backward displacements of the COM or COP when vibrating the calf muscles, to stimulate proprioceptive afferents, in stance on unstable surfaces compared with stable surfaces (Ivanenko et al. 1999; Kiers et al. 2012). These findings were interpreted as indicative of downweighting of proprioceptive information, which appears to be at odds with the findings and the rationale presented here. However, it should be noted that these postural shifts were measured well after the onset of muscle vibration. Initial COP shifts after switching on vibration are similar between standing on a rigid surface and on foam (Kiers 2014), which in view of the compliance of the foam even indicates a stronger response in the latter condition, in line with the increased proprioceptive feedback gain that we suggested above. Gains of short-latency responses based on proprioceptive feedback could be modulated independently of the weighting of proprioceptive information relative to other modalities in slower feedback loops, leading to differential effects of vibration on early and late postural responses, in line with models of postural control as presented, for example, by Goodworth and Peterka (2009). Such parallel feedback loops with independent gain setting could lead to a variable overall gain of the balance control loop. A reciprocal weighting of sensory information is often assumed to exist to avoid such changes in the overall feedback gain. However, empirical data do not consistently support a reciprocal nature of sensory reweighting at the level of the overall control loop (Andreopoulou et al. 2015; Polastri et al. 2012). It should be noted that sensory modalities not studied in the present or these previous studies may play a role. Specifically, sensation of the ground reaction force through pressure sensors in the skin can contribute to balance control (Maurer et al. 2006; Pasma et al. 2012). The signal-to-noise ratio of this source of information may be attenuated on an unstable surface and consequently its weighting may decrease, possibly maintaining a constant overall feedback gain. In this case, the oscillations observed would be due to an increase in the delay of the feedback loop due to the introduction of the unstable surface without a change in feedback gain.
Direct evidence for reduced gains of proprioceptive reflexes when balancing on unstable surfaces has also been reported (Chalmers and Knutzen 2002; Llewellyn et al. 1990; Trimble and Koceja 2001). The present results imply that such findings are dependent on the practice that participants have had on the unstable surface before taking the measurements and hence likely also on task difficulty. This may also explain why sitting on the same balance board as used in the present study, which is a much easier task, led to an immediate increase in effects of visual and vestibular manipulations (Andreopoulou et al. 2015).
Sensory weighting and training.
Over the initial trials before the 30-min training period, evidence was found for upweighting of visual and vestibular information, although this did not lead to larger effects of the sensory manipulations compared with standing on the rigid surface. One might suspect that small effects of vestibular and visual manipulations on the first pretraining trials were due to ceiling effects, since sway in these trials was large and possibly could not increase any further without balance loss. This would lead to an overestimation of training effects. However, sway was substantially larger in the trials with the vestibular manipulation than in the trials with the visual manipulation. Therefore, a ceiling effect can only be assumed for the vestibular manipulations in the first trials pretraining. The number of contacts with the support rail for these trials did not clearly increase with the vestibular manipulation, which argues against such a ceiling effect. Most importantly, upweighting of visual information with learning to balance on the unstable surface appeared most effective and is less likely to be overestimated.
Nevertheless, these training effects indicate that practice led to fast reweighting of sensory information for balance control in the expected direction, i.e., upweighting of visual and vestibular inputs. More indirectly, the decrease in the oscillations of the balance board indicates that the gain of proprioceptive feedback decreased with practice. This occurred both on a short and on a longer time scale as evidenced by differences among pretraining trials and between pre- and posttraining trials, with one of the participants even showing clear oscillations posttraining. In line with decreased proprioceptive reflex gains, reductions in H reflex as well as stretch reflex amplitudes were shown after long-term (weeks) balance training (Gruber et al. 2007; Keller et al. 2012; Taube et al. 2007b; Trimble and Koceja 2001). These reductions in reflex gains have been argued to be presynaptic and probably supraspinal in nature (Gruber et al. 2007; Keller et al. 2012; Taube et al. 2007b). In the present study, substantial reductions in EMG activity occurred with training and postsynaptic effects can thus not be excluded. While presynaptic inhibition of proprioceptive afferent would offer an elegant explanation for both the decrease in the oscillations and the changes in effects of the sensory manipulations, these processes appeared to occur on different time scales, with the former changing during the initial trials to remain constant thereafter and the latter still changing during the 30-min training.
Interestingly, during the last set of trials the effect of vestibular manipulation tended to decrease, while oscillations reappeared. It might be that the preceding trial with galvanic stimulation led to an upweighting of proprioceptive and downweighting of vestibular input.
Associations Between Training Effects
We found no significant correlations between changes in sway path and changes in the use of the hip strategy and in fact correlation coefficients were positive, indicating lower performance with more use of the hip strategy. As outlined above, we suggest that the hip strategy is used when balance cannot adequately be controlled by ankle moments. The preference for using the ankle strategy could be based on energetic efficiency, and the decrease in the effect of the derivative of the angular momentum on COM acceleration might be associated with decreasing effort. More EMG data than measured here or data on oxygen consumption would be required to test such a hypothesis.
The initial improvement in balance performance, occurring before the 30-min training period, was positively correlated with the change in magnitude of the effect of the visual manipulation, suggesting that the latter may cause this fast training effect. The changes in performance over the 30-min training period were positively correlated with the decrease in the oscillations of the balance board, again as argued above, an indication of a change in the use of sensory information as a causal factor underlying improvement of balance control. Taube et al. (2007a) reported significant positive correlations of improvements in balance performance with decreases transcranial magnetic stimulation-conditioned H reflexes but not with normal H reflexes, suggesting that cortical changes underlie improved performance through inhibitory effects on proprioceptive afferents. Participants who were exposed to muscle vibration during training on a balance board outperformed participants who were not (Nguyetnat 2011), suggesting that the former, not being able to use proprioceptive information for maintaining balance due to the vibration, were forced to use the more pertinent information and therewith achieved more robust training results. All in all, these findings indicate that balance training effects are to a large extent dependent on changes in the use of sensory information in balance control and not directly on changes in motor strategies. It should be kept in mind that our participants most likely were able to improve performance more than achieved within the short time frame of this study, and a role of changes in motor strategies at longer time scales cannot be excluded.
During the measurements, participants could grab a rail on either side of them to prevent falls. The number of times that the rail was touched was recorded (Table 1) but was not taken into account when expressing performance as COM path length. Participants touched the support rail more frequently in the unstable condition and when sensory manipulations were applied, which would have caused an underestimation of surface and manipulation effects. On the other hand, the dynamics of the unstable support are likely to amplify effects of sensory manipulations.
To avoid fatigue and unwanted training effects, we used very short data series. This limited interpretation of in particular the EMG linear envelopes and also had a negative effect on reliability and hence on study power for all frequency domain measures that were used.
The effects of surface condition were analyzed based on data collected after a training period of arbitrary length. As discussed above, this may be critical for some of the findings on effects of surface condition as performance and the underlying mechanisms were probably still evolving. On the other hand, these comparisons were more conservative than comparisons to the initial trials on the unstable surface would have been.
In one-legged balancing on a surface, which was unstable in the frontal plane, participants used changes in angular momentum to control balance more than on a stable surface. Surface conditions did not change the effects of a manipulation of visual input, while the effects of vestibular information were decreased on the unstable surface. With practice in balancing on the unstable surface, participants rapidly improved balance performance. Initial improvements were associated with upweighting of visual information, while later improvements were associated with the suppression of oscillatory ankle movement that we suggest may be attributable to excessive proprioceptive feedback gains.
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
Author contributions: J.H.v.D. and M.v.L. conception and design of research; J.H.v.D., M.v.L., and G.S.F. analyzed data; J.H.v.D., M.v.L., and G.S.F. interpreted results of experiments; J.H.v.D. prepared figures; J.H.v.D. drafted manuscript; J.H.v.D., M.v.L., and G.S.F. edited and revised manuscript; J.H.v.D., M.v.L., and G.S.F. approved final version of manuscript; M.v.L. performed experiments.
We thank Drs. Sjoerd Bruijn and Henri Kiers for reviewing previous versions of the paper.
- Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society


text:
A megawatt of power and 265-mile range let the EP9 be ultra quick and quite efficient.
China's NextEV is finally revealing its electric hypercar – the Nio EP9. While the low-slung coupe doesn't have a very catchy name, the colossal 1,341-horsepower (1,000-kilowatt) output should definitely grab attention. The firm will also market its future products under the Nio brand name.
The EP9 features four electric motors and each one has its own gearbox. The result of this high-tech setup is the ability reach 62 miles per hour from a standing start (100 kilometers per hour) in 2.7 seconds and hit 124 mph (200 kph) in 7.1 seconds. It tops out at 195 mph (313 kph). The drivetrain also gives the hypercar a range of 265 miles (427 km).
The massive amount of grunt allows the electric hypercar to lap the Nürburgring Nordschleife in just 7:05.12, which makes it the quickest EV ever around the famous track. That's impressive circuit by any measure, though. The time is quicker than the Lexus LFA Nürburgring Edition's 7:14, Dodge Viper ACR's 7:12.13, and Nissan GT-R Nismo's 7:08.69. There has been a massive evolution in EV performance in the last few years. For example, the track-only Toyota PV E002 managed an EV record for the time of 7:22:329 in 2012.
The EP9 looks low, lean, and futuristic. The design follows the supercar pack of being equally minimalist and aggressive. The interior goes for a similar mix of appearing purposeful and cutting edge. Drivers also get a great view out the front from the broad windshield that wraps around the cabin.
NextEV isn't yet announcing when EP9 deliveries begin or saying how much the hypercar costs. However, earlier speculation put the price at $1 million or more, which seems likely for a model with this level of performance.
Source: NextEV

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Reveal: St. Pete's Movers & Shakers
Oct. 7, 2016
Meet and celebrate the game changers who go to great lengths to make St Pete the wonderful city it is. Artists, entrepreneurs, organizers, reporters, mentors, politicos, and rockstars will all be in attendance, with several unique/fun/weird ways to dive deep into their minds. Be among the best at the Station House St. Pete from 6-10 p.m.
Event Details Venue Information Related
Oct. 7, 2016
Event CategoryCultural
General InformationHours6-10pm
Station House
260 1st Ave SSt. Petersburg, FL 33701


text: FilmsEdit Man of SteelEdit By Warren ManserBy Keith ChristensenAdd a photo to this gallery Retrieved from "http://dccomicsextendeduniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Faora-Ul/Gallery?oldid=38182" Ad blocker interference detected! Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected. Categories: Gallery Superman Man of Steel Add category Cancel Save


text:
More LotusScript learning resources
As an addendum to our 30 LotusScript tips tutorial, here are a few more helpful links to help you learn all you wanted to know about LotusScript.
This Article Covers
Administration Tools
If you found this LotusScript tutorial helpful, you may also be interested in the following SearchDomino.com learning resources:
Home: Introduction
Part 1: 10 fundamental LotusScript tips
Part 2: 10 everyday LotusScript tips
Part 3: 10 advanced LotusScript tips
Part 4: More LotusScript learning resources
Download: IT certifications that stand out
Are you looking to advance your career? Expand your knowledge? Boost your credibility? Our editors put together this complimentary 19-page guide on everything you need to know about obtaining an IT certification—with special attention given to cloud and desktop certifications.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.


text:
- PROJECT MAJOR EXPANSION OPEN HOUSE: 10:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m., Iberia Community Garden Co-op, 1505 S. Hopkins St., New Iberia. Also featuring Heirloom Produce Cooperative. Also 1:30 p.m.-2:30 p.m., Sugar City Growers Co-op, 2146 Main St., Jeanerette.
- GLORIA ROSS – A RETROSPECTIVE OPENING RECEPTION: 6 p.m., The Oak Street Gallery, 111 N. Oak St., Hammond. Exhibition to celebrate the 90th birthday of artist Gloria Ross. Work will be on display until Sept. 30.
- SOUTHEASTERN LION TAILGATE KICKOFF: 5 p.m., Albertsons, 1801 W. Thomas St., Hammond. Presentations by Lion head football coach Ron Roberts, student-athletes, the Spirit of the Southland Band, Roomie the Lion, cheerleaders and Lionettes. (985) 549-LION
- ROSEDALE PLANTATION GARDEN TOUR FRIDAYS: 10 a.m., Rosedale Plantation State Historic Site, La. 10, St. Francisville. The tour provides visitors with a detailed look at selected portions of the 19th century garden. Tour begins at the Site Office. (225) 635-3110
- THE STRANGE CASE OF DR. JEKYL AND MR. HYDE: 7:30 p.m. Friday, Saturday and Thursday, and 3 p.m. Sunday, Iberia Performing Arts League, 126 Iberia St., New Iberia. $10. (337) 364-6114 or firstname.lastname@example.com
- HAMMOND FARMERS MARKET: 8 a.m.-noon, #2 W. Thomas St., Hammond. Fresh produce, arts and crafts. (985) 277-5681 or email@example.com
- JEANERETTE FARMERS MARKET: 8 a.m.-noon, Jeanerette City Park. Tarleton Street, Jeanerette. Locally-grown foods and handmade items. (337) 276-4293 or jeanerettechamber.org
- LAFOURCHE CENTRAL MARKET: 8 a.m.-noon, Lafourche Central Market Pavilion, 4484 La. 1, Raceland. Local farmers, fishermen, artisans and more. Free. (985) 438-1231
- OPEN PADDLE BOAT CHALLENGE: Races begin at 8 a.m., False River at Morrison Parkway, New Roads. The Kiwanis of Pointe Coupee Parish sponsored day includes a 400-meter youth, three-mile and 10-mile adult paddle challenges. (225) 638-8626 or kiwanisofpointecoupee.org
- JANE AUSTEN DAYS: Audubon State Historic Site, La. 965, near St. Francisville. Tour the Oakley House. $8, adults; $6, seniors; $4, students; free, children 5 and younger. Dress in Jane Austen era clothing and receive free park admission. (225) 635-3739
- BOOK SIGNING: 2 p.m., Barnes & Noble, 5705 Johnston St., Lafayette. Authors of "The Most Dangerous Animal of All," Gary L. Stewart and Susan Mustafa, will be signing books. (337) 989-4142
- BATTLE ON THE BASIN: 11 a.m., Russo Boat Landing, La. 70, Morgan City. The family event includes a boat ramp that will allow everyone attending front row seats. $10, adults; $5, children; and $10 for each ice chest per day. (985) 397-6012 or deepsouthracing.net
- NUTCRACKER BALLET AUDITIONS: 11 a.m.-2 p.m. Saturday for ages 15 and older, Lafayette Ballet Theatre Studio, 100 Pillette Road, Lafatyette; and 1 p.m.-3 p.m. Sunday for ages 8 to 10; 3 p.m.-5 p.m. for ages 11 to 14 and 5 p.m.- 5:30 p.m. for gymnasts and tumblers, Angelle Hall, corner of St. Mary Boulevard and McKinley Street, Lafayette. There is a $25 registration fee for all dancers ages 8 to 17 due at the time of audition; no fee for gymnasts and tumblers. (337) 262-0444 or lafayetteballettheatre.org
- TECHE AREA FARMERS MARKET: 7 a.m.-11 a.m. Saturday, and 2:30 p.m.-6 p.m. Tuesday, Bouligny Plaza, 102 W. Main St., New Iberia. Locally grown produce and homemade products. (337) 369-2330
- HARVEST MOON TWILIGHT TOUR: 6 p.m., Rosedale Plantation State Historic Site, La. 10, St. Francisville. Special attention will be given to the influence of moon phases on planting and their importance in 19th century cultivation. The program begins at the Site Office. $15. (225) 635-3110
- BRIDGE PARTY: 11:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., The Bayou Teche Museum, 131 E. Main St., New Iberia. Participants can win prizes and partake in lunch and desserts and door prizes. $25. All proceeds will benefit the museum. (337) 606-5977
- GLC FARMERS MARKET: 2 p.m.-6 p.m., GLC Meat Market, 211 N. Main St., Loreauville. Locally grown produce and homemade products. (337) 577-9160
- AN ENTERTAINING EVENING OF LOUISIANA POLITICS: 5:30 p.m., Sugar Cane Festival Building, 600 Parkview Drive, New Iberia. Wine and hors d'oeuvres will be served followed by a reception welcoming the three noted politicos. Performance begins at 7 p.m. Tickets are $50 and can be purchased at Blue Butterfly, Paul's Flower Shop, Shadows-on-the-Teche and Mills Cashway Pharmacy in Breaux Bridge. (337) 658-9746
- BOOK TALK AND SIGNING: 6 p.m., Ascension Parish Library Donaldsonville Branch, 500 Mississippi St., Donaldsonville. Lynette Ater Tanner, author of "Chained to the Land - Voices from Cotton and Cane Plantations," will discuss her findings and sign copies of the book. Admission is free, but registration is required. (225) 473-8052
- NEIL LEBUTE'S DRAMA 'FAT PIG': 7:30 p.m., Cite des Arts, 109 Vine St., Lafayette. A Riveters Theatre Company production. $15, general admission; and $10, students. with ID. (337) 291-1122
- BACKWOODS GALLERY: 11931 Ferdinand St., St. Francisville. Feliciana Branch of the Louisiana Art and Artists' Guild exhibit will run until Dec. 31 and features a wide variety of subject matter, style and sizes. (225) 683-8673
- PAUL AND LULU HILLIARD UNIVERSITY ART MUSEUM: "The Walter Anderson Family Legacy: Shearwater Pottery," through Saturday, Sept. 6. Gallery hours: 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Tuesday and Thursday, 9 a.m.-noon Friday, and 10 a.m.-5 p.m. Saturday. (337) 482-2278.
- SHADOWS ON THE TECHE: 317 W. Main St., New Iberia. "Photography & Beyond," Exhibit of Roxy Blanton and Margaret Melancon's work. ShadowsontheTeche.org
Compiled by Leslie D. Rose


text:
- Home /
- Stunning Red Long Luxury Satin Nightdress
- Description
Heat up the atmoshphere in this Long Luxury Satin Nightdress/Nightgown from Seasonsway comes in Red color.This amazing nightdress features beautiful embroidery detailing on collar. This Satin Night gown will certainly add value to your loungewear / sleepwear wardrobe.
Check out the complete collection of Women Nightwear,Nightgown,Nighty at Seasonsway.com-India's Largest Women Online Shopping Store and add best apparels to your wardrobe today!
DISCLAIMER : Products sold on Seasonsway.com are brand new and 100% genuine.Every effort has been made to ensure that the information on this site is accurate, If you find any error, please report here
Free Shipping
This Product Qualifies for Free Shipping
Seasonsway Best price guarantee
It's simple! Seasonsway guarantees you're getting the best price on This product. If you should find a better price online for the same Product on an Indian Shopping site within 24 hours, Seasonsway will refund the difference and give you a Shopping coupon worth Rs. 500/-
The Fast Shipping Guarantee
This product will be shipped out within one business day! In fact, over 90% of orders placed Monday-Friday before 3pm IST ship the same day.These are not just pretty words. We stand behind this commitment with our Fast Shipping Guarantee. Cash On Delivery Orders will be shipped out within 48 hours. Here's the guarantee: if we don't ship out within one business day, we will give you 10% off your order.Check the best rates of Bra,Panties , Lingerie, Swim Suit on our website Seasonsway.com.
Need Some Help ?
Call on 08080034005
- Additional Information
Additional Information
Manufacturer N/A material Satin Color Red Size One Size Delivery Area All India


text:
Wildcats Upset No. 8 Jayhawks
Before an excited, energetic crowd, the Wildcats (14-15, 7-9 Big 12) upset No. 8 Kansas (22-6, 11-4 Big 12), 70-63, in one of their best performances of the 2014-15 season, one that marked the first time in over 30 years K-State defeated KU in back-to-back home games.
"We did a great job defending, we fought them, we had some guys be special and we used the energy of the crowd," said Wildcat head coach Bruce Weber after the game. "It was an unbelievable atmosphere. It is a nice night for K-State. I'm happy for (the players), but I'm really happy for K-State because I know how important this is."
Last night's win took an all-around team effort. The Wildcats were able to put the past behind them and focus on nothing but than the task at hand.
"I just asked them to forget about what happened before, not worry about the future and focus on the moment," added Weber. "I've talked all season about not dwelling in the past and not worrying about the future, just focusing on today, and I think they did that. They focused on today and how to be successful."
Perhaps the most focused of all, the team was led by sophomore Nigel Johnson, whose 20 points on 8-of-11 shooting were a career-high.
"After I saw my first two go in, that gave me confidence to just keep shooting it," said Johnson. "The environment was great. You can easily go out and get over-excited, so I was just trying to stay calm, and then after a couple of my shots went down I was just playing basketball."
The sophomore from Ashburn, Virginia, stepped up and time after time as he helped the Wildcats when the team needed him most.
Maybe he was feeling it, but maybe it was because his mom, Sidney Johnson, was in the house. The last time Johnson scored points in the double digits (14 points) was at West Virginia on Feb. 11, a game in which his mom was also in attendance.
"His mom came, and it was his mom's birthday yesterday," laughed Weber when asked what factor he credited Johnson's stellar performance to. "Yesterday was the first time a player texted me about having our meeting early so he could go with his mom for a birthday dinner. I'm happy she was here. He did well when she was in West Virginia, so she got a nice birthday present tonight."
Following Johnson, Wildcat seniors Thomas Gipson and Nino Williams anchored the team as Williams scored 15 points and grabbed five rebounds, while Gipson scored 12 points and grabbed a team-high six rebounds.
"It was a good, good team win," said Williams, who hit a jumper with less than 30 seconds remaining to essentially put the game away. "I think today's game we came out and we went at them. They have confidence just by being Kansas, and we just told ourselves to come out and play. We've got them two years in a row now, so it's good to beat them. Like coach said, it's good for the fans, the alumni, all the students. This was a good, family K-State win, a big-time K-State win."
While the Wildcats took the evening to celebrate, today, the focus returns to their next opponent. Continuing a two-game home stand, the Wildcats host on No. 12/13 Iowa State on Saturday at 3 p.m.
"It was all about fighting them, battling and playing hard," said Weber. "If you just let them play chess, you're not going to win. You've got to knock the queen over, knock the pawns over. You can't just let them get in a rhythm and routine, you have to battle them. We did that."
For game notes, stats, quotes and more on last night's game, please click here.
We hope you enjoy K-State Sports Extra. We would like to hear your comments and any story ideas for future emails, so fire them our way. Contact Kelly McHugh or K-State Assistant AD for Communications Kenny Lannou.


text: SportRamsey scores twice in Arsenal victory Aaron Ramsey returns to haunt his former club as table-topping Gunners fire three goals past Cardiff. 30 Nov 2013 19:59 GMT | Sport, Football Arsenal midfielder Aaron Ramsey, left, refuses to celebrate with Olivier Giroud after scoring against Cardiff [AFP]Aaron Ramsey has scored twice against his old team to help Arsenal beat Cardiff 3-0 and provisionally extend their Premier League lead to seven points. Ramsey headed in a pinpoint cross from Mesut Ozil in the 29th minute to put Arsenal ahead, and finished off the victory on a counterattack in injury time with his 13th goal of the season in all competitions. The Welshman refused to celebrate these two, though, having started his career at Cardiff, where he made his debut at 16. "This is where I started my career and where everything began, and hopefully they've seen the player they produced today,'' said Ramsey, arguably the Premier League's star player so far this season. In between, Ozil set up the second goal as well, slotting a perfectly weighted pass into the area for the onrushing Mathieu Flamini to hammer into the net in the 86th. The win puts Arsenal seven points ahead of second-placed Liverpool and third-placed Chelsea, who both play on Sunday. Everton's 4-0 rout In other Premier League action, Everton moved level on points with Liverpool and Chelsea, when they thrashed Stoke 4-0 at Goodison Park. Gerard Deulofeu scored in the 45th with a left-footed shot from the six-yard box before Seamus Coleman added a second four minutes after the interval. Bryan Oviedo's low strike from outside the area made it 3-0 in the 58th before Belgium forward Romelu Lukaku, on loan from Chelsea, grabbed a fourth at close range in the 79th. The Toffees have 24 points from 13 games and are undefeated at home in the league throughout the calendar year. Stoke, hovering near the relegation zone, have 13 from 13. Newcastle are just one point and provisionally one place further back after a 2-1 win over West Bromwich Albion secured by goals from Frenchman Yoan Gouffran and Moussa Sissoko in the team's fourth victory in a row. Meanwhile, West Ham beat struggling Fulham 3-0 at Upton Park, and Sunderland moved off the bottom of the Premier League table with a 0-0 draw at Aston Villa. The Black Cats move above Crystal Palace, who lost 1-0 to Norwich at Carrow Road.Source: Al Jazeera and agencies


text:
Advertencia GORE. Compilado con las mejores imágenes de muertes sádicas, sólo aca..
What a lovely day for a 3359290! SCK was here
I very glad to find this website on bing, just what I was looking for 😀 besides saved to favorites.
Fantastic post.Ne'er knew this, thank you for letting me know.
I collected so many interesting things inside your blog especially its discussion. In the a lot of comments on your posts, I think I am not the only one having all of the enjoyment here! continue the good work.Regards
really fine work. i truly like that new perspective introduced right here. i just ask yourself the way the global power strugle could effect most this.http://www.bailbondssanmarino.org/
You make blogging look like a walk within the park! I've been attempting to blog daily but I just cant discover writing material.. you are an inspiration to me and i'm certain a lot of other people! http://www.bailbondslakeforest.org/
I actually still cannot quite believe I could always be one of those studying the important guidelines found on your web site. My family and I are truly thankful for your generosity and for presenting me the chance to pursue my chosen profession path. Appreciate your sharing the important information I got from your site.
I was recommended this website by my cousin. I'm not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my problem. You're amazing! Thanks!
Super-Duper website! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am taking your feeds also
I liked your article.Awesome subject. http://www.bailbondssignalhill.org/
Grüß Gott! Netter Newsblog! Supplements Fatburner Kapseln sind assistent beim fixen Abbau von Fettdepots! Danke sehr!
This is a good blog. Keep up all the work. I too love blogging and expressing my opinions.dog training
Hi there, Great post!
This blog is so nice to me. I will keep on coming here again and again. Visit my link as well.
I liked your article.Great subject. http://www.bailbondslamirada.org/
Thanks, I was doing a google search and your site came up for foreclosures in Winter Park, FL, Orlando, FL but anyway, I have had a pleasant time reading it, keep it up!
Fantastic, beautiful blog with great informational content. This is a really interesting and informative post.
You're the best, are you looking for real estate in Casselberry, FL? Learn where the deals are, get REO lists and find homes for sale in Altamonte Springs.
Great templates but one thing i want to ask that how could we use these templetes in blogger?
When do you think this Real Estate market will go back up? Or is it still too early to tell? We are seeing a lot of housing foreclosures in Oviedo Florida. What about you? We would love to get your feedback on this.
Fantastic, I was doing a google search and your site came up for homes for rent in Winter Park, FL, Orlando, FL but anyway, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading it, keep it up!
This is i'm in search of. Here is what I refer to as value. The details provided here should be to the most. I would like say you will require invested some time in showing every one of these satisfied jointly. They are match with your theme. I will advocate this specific to the world and all my acquaintances. I will go back here to try out how much deliver the results. Appreciate making these take place.affiliatespam
Hello, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog in Firefox, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, terrific blog!
What a fantastic post, appreciate it very much, was wondering do you have a RSS feed where I can register and follow your future articles?
Pretty nice post, thank you.
Would you be interested in exchanging links?
I picture this could be diverse upon the written content material? in spite of this I still consider that it may be suitable for nearly any type of matter subject material, as a result of it could steadily be gratifying to decide a heat and pleasant face or perhaps pay attention a voice while initial landing.
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I will be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will certainly return.affiliatespam
Hey mate, thanks for posting but this page is hard to read in Firefox it is is overlapping.
Hello there! I could have sworn I've been to this website before but after checking through some of the post I realized it's new to me. Anyhow, I'm definitely delighted I found it and I'll be book-marking and checking back frequently!
Hi there, beautiful site with great informational content. This is a really interesting and informative content.
Awesome, that's exactly what I was scanning for! You just spared me alot of searching around.affiliatespam
You're the best, I enjoyed Muertes Sádicas – ElCachondeo.cl. It was good. View my blog sometime, it all about Casselberry, FL Real Estate.
It is rare to find well-informed people about this question, but you appear to be you know what you??e discussing! Thanks
Ill get a pair and maybe do a few short runs of 2-3 miles in them, where I can stay on the grass in a park.
So, as I said, if Brown wins, the dumb & bad guys win overall. With that said, though, and if there was less at stake health care reform especially I would not terribly mind having someone like Brown win, but only for one reason: the Republican party has become this weird cesspool of anti-science, willfully ignorant, and utterly malicious right wingers, and having a more traditional Republican like Brown with a bread & butter philosophy of fiscal conservatism, having a strong military and promoting good business win in a state like Massachusetts might cause a shift overall in Republican politics from the fringe right to something less polarized and much more constructive. Even if only seen as an election tactic, that would still bring better balance to what Ive always considered the Demo-Republican (or Republocratic) two-party system in this country. The parties need to get along to get anything done, and they should bring their strengths to the table. Democrats (primarily liberals) tend to be like architects who come up with the new ideas, while Republicans (primarily conservatives) are more like the contractors and investors who should try to make those ideas practical and cost effective.
I completely agree with you on that one!affiliatespam
Hello! I'm at work browsing your blog from my new apple iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the outstanding work!
I'm not sure exactly how I discovered your blog because I had been researching information on Real Estate in Winter Park, FL, but anyway, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading it, keep it up!
Intriguing article. I know I'm a bit late in posting my comment however the article ended up being to the idea and merely the details I was looking for. I can't say which i agree with everything you could mentioned nevertheless it was emphatically fascinating! BTW…I found your blog by using a Google search. I'm a frequent visitor on your blog all of which will return again soon.affiliatespam
I love the dear data you be offering to your articles. I will be able to bookmark your weblog and have my kids take a look at up right here generally. I'm reasonably positive they are going to be informed numerous new stuff right here than anybody else!
i like the colours of one's blog site
Great page…keep up the good work!
After research a couple of of the blog posts on your web site now, and I truly like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site listing and can be checking again soon. Pls check out my web page as well and let me know what you think.affiliatespam
Welcome to the most powerful Black Magic Spells on the internet! Black Magic Spells is known to be the best magick of all psychic arts! Now you can ask a real Black Magic Spells caster to cast love spells just for you! Experience the amazing and effective power of Black Magic, just like dozens of happy clients did before you. blackmagicspells.co.cc
Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I'm using the same blog platform as yours and I'm having trouble finding one? Thanks a lot!
Remarkable blog. it's great to see some valuabe content on a free resource. Nice to stumle across this web site. Thanks again for your information and facts.
I really like your blog and i really appreciate the excellent quality content you are posting here for free for your online readers. Can you tell us which blog platform you are using?affiliatespam
Great job, thanks
If you want fast and powerful results for your spell, you have found the right place! My Black Magic Spells are guaranteed to work within 2 months, no matter how complex your problem is! Most spells I cast even give results in less than 15 days! If you notice absolutely no results from my work, you will get a free recast. Satisfaction 100% Guaranteed & Fast results Black Magic Spells I am positive that you wont find such a deal elsewhere.
blackmagicspells.co.cc or 0044 7017450013
Thanks… I bookmarked this site. I will check back.
Intriguing article. I know I'm a bit late in posting my comment however the article ended up being to the idea and merely the details I was looking for. I can't say which i agree with everything you could mentioned nevertheless it was emphatically fascinating! BTW…I found your blog by using a Google search. I'm a frequent visitor on your blog all of which will return again soon.affiliatespam
Hi! I just found your cool blog with Bing and i love it!
I am speechless. This is a very good weblog and very attractive too. Nice paintings! That's now not in reality much coming from an amateur publisher like me, but it's all I may say after diving into your posts. Great grammar and vocabulary. No longer like different blogs. You in point of fact recognise what you?re speaking about too. Such a lot that you made me wish to discover more. Your weblog has grow to be a stepping stone for me, my friend.
merhabalar diziler erotik sex porno siteleri istedin kadar var seks video izle erotik selam
Wonderful blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I've been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Many thanks
Howdy! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a extraordinary job!
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. ??
Excellent blog right here! after reading, i decide to buy a sleeping bag ASAP 🙂
Hey very nice website!! Man .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I am happy to find a lot of useful info here in the post, we need develop more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .
This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks! ratetake.com
Comments are closed.


text:
Road to Civil War
Reform Movements
As during everything during this time Reform Movements were also an impact to the Sectionalism between the North and South.
A. The temperance movement accrued during the 1830s and 1840s. The temperance movement occurred because of the abuse of alcohol. The woman who were involved in this movement were also involved in the women's rights movement. The temperance movement was led by the American Christian Temperance Union who tried to make alcohol illegal to save American families because alcohol abuse in the home were becoming outrageous. Alcohol was banned in some states. In 1920 the 18th amendment was passed, which declared alcohol illegal.
B. The treatment of the insane movement started in 1848. This reform was led by Dorothea Dix. Dorothea dix went to North Carolina and called for reform for the care of mentally ill patients. It was significant because it caused better care for mentally ill.
C. The women's rights movement started in 1848. The movement was led by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott and the held a women's rights conference at the Seneca Fall Convention. At the Seneca Fall Convention the Declaration of Women's Rights was wrote.
D. The Education Movement was led by Horace Mann. The movement created mandatory public education in the United States.
Manifest Destiny
Manifest Destiny started in the 1840s. A lot of people believed that the United States was destined to move westward in expansion from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. Manifest Destiny pushed people to the west increasing population in the west. To Americans expansion offered more self dependent and freedom. As we started to spread West it became an issue for the North and South because they had to decide who was going to be a free or slave state. So the conflict of slavery increased.
Fugitive Slave Law of 18
The fugitive slave law occurred, as it says, in 1850. It came from the Compromise of 1850. Federal commissioners were given the authority to issue warrants, gather, posses, and force citizens to help catch runaway slaves. Many blacks that were free and born free was trapped by this law because some people caught them and sent them back to the South. African Americans were not able to testify in court, so this injustice went on. The tension rose between the North and the South. The North was being made to go out there way to capture slaves.
Uncle TomsCabin
Uncle toms cabin was published in 1852 by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Supposedly Abraham Lincoln said to Stowe when he met her "So you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war." This work made slavery a moral issue. It touched people's heart and made them think about the principles of right and wrong. Uncle Toms Cabin is a story about a slave named Tom. Uncle Toms Cabin increased the tension between the North and the South and pushed them to the Civil War.
Kansas Nebraska Act
This Act allowed the people who lived in the territory to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. It repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and it prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30´. The North was very angry about this act because everything was going fine with them with the Missouri Compromise. The South Strongly supported this act, thought that this was a way to gain more slave areas. The north wanted to abolish slavery.
Dred Scott Decision
Dred Scott was a African American Slave. He first migrated around with his master Peter Blow. But after he died he was bought by an army surgeon named Dr. John Emerson. Dred Scott lived in numerous free states while under Emerson. But then some say he didn't know about his rights. After Emerson died he was sold to an army captain. Then he decided To fight for his freedom after his master refused Dred Scott offer of $300 to be set free. Even though the court ruled against him, His former master Blow's son had helped him to pay for his legal fees during the court period. When they said no, Blow's son then purchased him then set Scott and his wife and set them free. Then after nine months of freedom, Scott died.
Dread Scott decided to sue for his freedom in 1847. 10 years after still fighting for hiscase he then went to the United States Supreme Court. This decision ruled that African Americans could never become citizens of the United States and that they could not testify in court let alone sue. Northerners were outraged by this decision and the South were happy. This decision impacted the nomination of Abraham Lincoln to the Republican Party as the President of the United states. Then the South wanted to Succeed from the Union but they were not going out without a fight.
Transcontinental Rail
The transcontinental Railroad period lasted between 1862-1869. The Pacific Railroad Act chartered the Union Pacific Railroad and Central Pacific companies. The charter told them to build a transcontinental railroad that would link the United States from east to west. The Transcontinental Railroad got entangled with sectionalism between the North and South about where to put it. They were both eager to have it on their side and win. The two companies raced from two sides. One coming from Sacramento, California and the the company from Omaha, Nebraska. With this project came great risks they were taking. But finally on May 10, 1869 they met at Promontory, Utah. With the westward expansion, communication from the old states and the area west of the Mississippi River became more and more critical.