text:
It's been almost one week here in Tecpán. One week of emotional highs and lows. Tecpán is a small village town about 90 minutes from Guatemala City. It has a population of about 10,000 people, most of whom are indigenous. I am realizing how lucky we all have it in North America. Simple things like hot water showers and clean tap water are things that we all take for granted. Here, we are limited to 5 minute showers, otherwise we will, literally, run out of water in the house. We also have a choice of taking a hot shower with low water pressure or a cold shower with high water pressure. And in the event of a bad rainstorm, we may have no water, and then it will be all about the bucket showers!
The tap water is also not potable. We have a special dish washing procedure to ensure that dishes are not contaminated as well as two large "buckets" to filter the tap water. On my first night, I had a minor panic attack when I ran my toothbrush under the tap water, and then proceeded to brush my teeth with it! Luckily, I have not had any stomach problems yet!
However, despite the seemingly difficult living conditions, one thing that I notice amongst many locals in Guatemala is their sense of love and happiness. Everyone has been very warm and welcoming to us gringos. I am fortunate to be given this opportunity to be humbled, to realize that happiness comes from within and not from our surroundings.
There is also one café in Tecpán that serves a pretty good cappuccino! Mynor, the 13 year old barista, has dreams of competing in a barista competition! It was funny when I went to the café, because apparently I had already gotten the reputation of being the "chichi barista from Ethical Bean Coffee in Canada"! However, with my lack of Spanish, Mynor and I just had many blank stares and embarrassing laughs as I tried to help him with the espresso machine. I am eager to learn Spanish so that I can communicate with Mynor and help him with his shots and latte art! I will definitely be back!


text:
is back-ordered. We will ship it separately in 10 to 15 days.
We all know the rules--skip wearing green on St. Patrick's day and risk getting pinched. And who's better at pinching than the Maryland crab? Play it safe this year, and wear this shirt!
This simple design is great for any St. Patty's day wardrobe (particularly for those who live the Eastern Shore life!).

subset: commoncrawl


text:
TONY EASTLEY: Australia is mentioned regularly as becoming the food bowl of Asia, but there's a lot between the promise, the projections and reality.
The National Farmers' Federation (NFF) has put together a blueprint setting out how Australia can map out a strong sustainable path for Australia's agriculture.
The NFF's CEO is Matt Linnegar.
Matt Linnegar, good morning. What is this blueprint all about?
MATT LINNEGAR: This blueprint is the first time that the entire sector in agriculture, everyone from the farm through to food companies etc, have come together to discuss and to lay out in front of us, you know, what are the important things for the future of the sector and how can we overcome some of the problems in front of us and indeed how can we grasp the opportunities that may be there.
TONY EASTLEY: But is something broke that needs fixing?
MATT LINNEGAR: Oh look, I think not so much broke. I think certain parts of the sector and individuals you may speak to are under pressure, there's no doubt about it but…
TONY EASTLEY: What are those areas Mr Linnegar?
MATT LINNEGAR: Well look I think the first of those is that we're seeing for the first time in many decades a stagnation and even a decline in productivity of the sector. So we've been, one of the good news stories over the last 50 years and that has declined in more recent times.
And I think one reason for that is also the stagnation in the investment in R&D in the sector. We also know there are significant labour shortages in this sector. We also understand that some of the perceptions that are out there about agriculture are perhaps not what they used to be. So if you start to add those things together, that's what's led to the situation we're in.
And we know and we keep hearing about the enormous opportunity for the sector there but what do we need to do in order to grasp it? And that's what we're trying to grapple with here.
TONY EASTLEY: That takes us back to government. Do you think either party at the moment has the right policies in place or do they need tweeking? Does your blueprint address that?
MATT LINNEGAR: Well to be fair Tony I don't think we've seen the full suite of policies from either side of politics at this point. But really what this affords us the opportunity now to talk to both parties and say, well look, this is what the sector think is important for their future, how will you respond to that. So we're looking forward to that.
TONY EASTLEY: So the politicians have to develop some policies fairly quickly?
MATT LINNEGAR: Well look I think they are well and truly down the path of their policy development but I think…
TONY EASTLEY: You've just to steer them in the right direction there.
MATT LINNEGAR: Yeah, I think some of the things we are putting in front of them can certainly be incorporated, let's put it that way.
TONY EASTLEY: Foreign capital: is it needed, more of it needed in Australia to grow the industry?
MATT LINNEGAR: Look Tony capital full-stop is needed to grow the industry and that will include no doubt foreign capital so that's going to be very important. And, you know, I think that we can get hung up on where the sources of that are coming from. And we've called all along, as long as we've got transparency around that information, we know about the foreign investment coming in, then that's the first step. So we will need capital for the future though.
TONY EASTLEY: Matt Linnegar, if there was just one thing that you wanted in this election year, what would it be?
MATT LINNEGAR: Oh look, if it's just one thing I would say we have come out of the election with the spotlight focussed on agriculture, food and fibre and we have moved up that priority list for the government of the day.
TONY EASTLEY: Matt Linnegar, thanks for joining us on AM.
MATT LINNEGAR: Thanks Tony.
TONY EASTLEY: Matt Linnegar, the CEO of the National Farmers' Federation. And AM is on the road all next week talking to farmers, fishermen and market gardeners, examining if Australia can really be the food bowl for Asia and asking whether the politicians have the right policies.
AM will be reporting from Tasmania to the Top End. That's next week.
The full story...
Agriculture blueprint hopes to make food bowl a reality
Tony Eastley reported this story on Thursday, February 14, 2013 08:19:00
TONY EASTLEY: Australia is mentioned regularly as becoming the food bowl of Asia, but there's a lot between the promise, the projections and reality.
Related Links
ABC takes no responsibility for the sites these links take you to.


text:
February 7, 2016
The American Conservative Article
Spot on article from the American Conservative
"Were this Britain or France, the GOP would have long ago split between its open-borders, globalist, war party wing, and its populist, patriotic, social conservative wing.
The latter would be demanding a timeout on immigration, secure borders, no amnesty, no more needless wars, and a trade policy dictated by what was best for America, not Davos or Dubai."
In a nutshell…this is why I left the GOP. They push the populists to the side. Those of us who want to secure the border, avoid endless war (FUTURE entanglements), and create trade policies in the interest of America are not allowed.
The donor interests who simultaneously own the media will push open-borders, globalization, and war (most ties back to money).
The patriotic, social conservative, populists, and liberty leaning candidates like me are not allowed an equal microphone at the table within the party.
I'm all in with Carson and Trump for my finalists in the GOP (PS–I like some third party candidates as well). I wish Trump had stronger social convictions and I wish Carson was not so duped into non constitutional crony trade treaties (most medical people struggle with economics). This is why I can't pick a winner yet and need to hear more debate.
They are the last chances we have to keep those controlled by the money out. I'm OK with Cruz. Cruz is probably the most balanced on social and economic issues. However, he appears to have sold out with his attempted hiding of money from Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, and inviting K-Street candidates to campaign for him. I don't know if he has the real courage to overcome the donor class.
Rubio supported amnesty before border security (just a fact that he has changed–just like his religion–FOUR flips!). The US Chamber supports open-borders. Now, we have a rising Nebraska conservative candidate that can't get a border bill to the desk (despite being in the inner circle of Homeland Security), is endorsed by the chamber (fighting hard for open border), and campaigns for Rubio.
On pro-life we have ringing endorsements from Wells Fargo (have you moved your money yet?), Bank of America, and Fannie Mae. These entites continue to support our conservative candidates AND actively fund Planned Parenthood.
Somehow Republican Nebraska can't figure out why 100 day pledges on key Pro-Life bills go unfilled, a border bill cannot be put on the desk by the Republican majority, and the general welfare of the American people continues to slip. However, they can figure out how to share the latest and greatest speech and continue to preach accountability wihout really demanding any from their own. To put the cherry on top, many Nebraskans think our candidates giving the President fast track authority are out to defend the Constitution. This isn't even a stretch to understand giving ANY executive authority at the request of this President is likely to be UNconstitutional. Don't be a Democrat. However, don't be Republican either if you really believe in the Constitution.
As we move into 2016, the media is slaming Rubio/Hillary down our throats and demonizing their opponents in an attempt to sway the average voter who needs to identify with popular acceptance in their environment. They need to find the courage to stand alone and join a smaller (but quickly growing) movement to stand for principles. Both larger movements are controlled by the money.
As far as Rubio goes, Santorum (who endorsed Rubio) and Jeb who pledged Rubio to be VP can't name ONE accomplishment of Rubio in the Senate. I would argue the same can be said about our establishment candidates at home. Yet people are falling in love with the speeches and ignoring the same donors behind the scenes that have run the show for years for both sides. The majority of Americans would demand God let Aaron, not Moses, lead them through the desert because he could talk better.
Times need to change before we start making rookie federal officials American stars. What happened to the ball player that had to be a 30/30 or 40/40 guy before they were awarded the MVP?
Maybe you will start to understand the identity of the party and realize the social conservative, closed border, populist has no room in the GOP at the microphone.
We can be brothers and sisters when the GOP joins us on the second amendment, seeks to secure this nation, defends religious liberty, and pushes for less regulation. However, we need to defend the Constitution and promote the general welfare of We the People first. These are the principles forgotten by both main stream establishment parties.
Have a good weekend … read my thoughts on King David/Moses and Corporate Hog Farming to be posted later this weekend.
Posted in Foreign Policy, Military, National Defense, Populism | By Todd Watson
January 27, 2016
Posted in Uncategorized | By Todd Watson
January 19, 2016
Part I: Remembering Dr. King
Part II: The Similarities to the "Non Establishment" Movement
Part III: Lessons from Dr. King to All Activists
Part IV: Discrimination in Nebraska
Part V: Observed and Noted Discrimination – A Good Sign that Justice is at Work!
Part VI: Pastors Must Become Bolder
Part VI: In Summary
Part VII: My Favorite Sermon from TD Jakes
Todd Watson's Speech from Montgomery Alabama
Part I: Remembering Dr. King
Today, we celebrate and remember Dr. King. I was fortunate this past summer to travel across the Southeast and learn about the approach to civil disobedience employed during the civil rights era. I appreciated the discussion with many Independent Conservative and Constitutional Candidates during our travels. The passionate talk about how, what, and when we will advocate to create change to overcome two parties acting unconstitutionally was an energizing experience. I was happy to hear the same themes in the South as I have heard in the Midwest.
We are fast approaching a dangerous liberty limiting era in American history. Our people are clamoring for a government they see in other nations! We have Biblical precedence on what happens to citizens when they become jealous for other government forms that offer less freedom then they are currently blessed to live under! People desiring government leadership over their lives is nothing new for groups of people (even the religious) that have drifted in their faith and trust in God.
Civil disobedience training is needed for our people to prepare themselves for a government organized by individuals and parties willing to violate their Constitutional oath. Constitutional education is needed more than ever for every American to know their rights of what they are obligated to accept and reject!
I had studied Dr. King through the textbooks, but the visual tours added so much more detail and depth to his movement. I encourage you to visit the Southeast with your family. Alabama is the best state to really digest, feel, and learn civil disobedience in American history. The triangle of Montgomery, Selma, and Birmingham is loaded with American history.
Your kids (if you have them) will feel and learn the power of movements that begin in God's Church. I cherished my moment in prayer at the churches central to the civil rights movement. To picture/comprehend/feel God's strong message he delivered at these locations through these historical leaders was very powerful. I tried to empathize with the depth of rage and corresponding strength/commitment to the non-violent cause one must have dealt with after church bombings claimed children from people of faith, caring for neighbors beaten with clubs, or losing friends to murder from hostile organizations. Our brothers and sisters in Charleston, South Carolina demonstrated the response the people of the South had to display in those times. Thanks for reawakening a solid testimony Charleston! It is a sad to continue to see this level of hate across our land.
My visit reinvigorated me to continue my protest to those abusing their power in Washington at the cost of the people. It inspired me to continue to teach our population (especially children) on how to be difference makers in their community through the church. We need these movements born in the church demonstrated to our kids again. I'm talking to you Pastors! Are you training your followers (especially youth) to be bolder for truth and the betterment of others?
Dr. King walked the walk. He didn't just talk the talk.
We have politicians talking the talk today to capitalize on the "Non Establishment" movement. Unlike Dr. King, they don't walk the walk. Why? They have not gone through the trials and steps as highlighted in TJ Jakes sermon that most leaders go through (See bottom of blog) to become a leader of people. They have not been convicted with the true message and the desire for their citizens to prosper.
Many of our main stream politicians have walked a walk of continual popularity, no trials, and public praise. They are literally addicted to the adoration of others. They have not gone through the trials Dr. King and others have that usually correlate to leading a movement of justice for the benefit of the people.
Many of these politicians have had personal trials. They are human. However, many in the popular position have not had the political trials that promote standing for truth over party/donor interest. Many have not gone through the trials of standing for right at the cost of standing with the majority. This is why our Republic is dying. A government filled with individuals consumed with being popular with the 'majority' is not the design of the original Constitutional Republic!
Dr. King was the figurehead of the civil rights movement. However, there were many more spiritual and civil rights leaders making the difference on the ground that did not garner attention. Each of them internalized the righteous anger that came from social injustice. Each of them made a difference for the betterment of others.
With Dr. King as the backdrop to each story, I hope you enjoy my blog. Please read the captions in the pictures for many of the thoughts I had from my travels across the South (I was in Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Tennessee and Kentucky). Thank God for an American example like Dr. King to show how to fight from the pulpit, advocate for social justice, and demonstrate non-violent courage in the face of power. People armed with pen, camera, or club that seek to silent free speech around issues of justice are very real. Dr. King taught us how to respond!
What I Learned During My Year of Advocating for the Modern Day "Non Establishment" Movement
During the Senate campaign, I was the only conservative to show up and debate in North Omaha. North Omaha is a predominant African-American community in Omaha for the benefit of my national readers.
North Omaha is home to one of the worst violence rates in America. Many politicians (like the Republicans in my race who would not attend) are afraid to make a visit and discuss issues with people that are not similar to 'their circle'. Fear, political irrelevance, racism, disrespect…whatever the reason….they are afraid to speak in North Omaha. Speaking to the North Omaha community was very important to me. It was my privilege to speak to all citizens across this state in 2014. I had a new Constitutional message of hope that had to be delivered to all people despite their background or political persuasion. The Constitution offers hope to many popular themes (income equality, justice, etc.) in North Omaha.
I also had a message of rebuke to deliver to local pastors in Omaha passively accepting platforms of "Pro-Choice" and other non family oriented policies in an effort to compromise for politicians seeking aid for the local area. It was not just a "Be Cool" mission I had in attending North Omaha. I had a rebuking mission as well for Pastors flowing in the wind against the solid guidance of God's word.
Playing favorites to particular groups of people is not my belief set as evidenced in my message, my donors, and my conduct. The conduct of my other "Conservative" Republican rivals is self-evident.
I debated Domina, Ashford, Jenkins, and Crawford (All Democrat and One Former Democrat, now Independent Candidate). All questions were posed by members of Nebraska's North Omaha community. Did I take some heckling for some of my conservative answers? Of course. However, the vast majority welcomed my appearance. We had a great night of shared dialogue! Those that gave me a hug/handshake for being a pioneering conservative to finally show up to their political forum fueled my spirit. Thanks for your encouragement! Your encouragement, welcoming, and fellowship meant more to me then you know. I'm happy to stand with and not be ashamed of Pastors no matter where they live. However, I was clear to be in full support of the Pro-Life Bible Believing Pastors of the community. Community betterment were mutually shared goals. A shared philosophy of whom makes betterment possible made it easier to stand together. (Of course, I respected the views and beliefs of the other Pastors as a good American will observe).
Senator Sasse, Representative Fortenberry, and then Representative Terry did not show to debate, listen, or speak. This may sound like 1950 behavior, but in fact this is 2015 GOP behavior in Nebraska. I know the GOP doesn't like hearing me preach to them. However like Dr. King, truth must be spoken to power despite their disgust (See LBJ/Dr. King examples)!
Not debating, not showing up, not listening…..these are the actions that contribute to GOP perception of bias and ignorance of specific citizens whether that be in South Sioux City and the Latin community or North Omaha and the African American Community. These actions are not well received.
Dr. King through his actions taught me how different and bold change agents must be. (My attendance is not that bold by the way). The advocating of Non Established conservatism and Constitutional views for the people can take time for adoption…especially when money from the people you speak for is not plentiful to fund ads. The problem is compounded when money from the ruling class takes out ads broadcasting "Populist Promises" to the people. Trust is hard to decipher in 2016 Partisan America.
My followers represented the rank and file hard working conservative. Like TD Jakes teaches, many of my followers abandoned me "To Win" the vote and beat the liberal at the end. I have no hard feelings. However, I'll keep sharpening my "Caleb and Joshua" sermon for these followers. They really don't believe God is in control of the situation. Deep down they still believe they are in control. Our "Free Will" is just on display before he acts (My belief).
In the end, I'm happy to report progress for the Non Establishment movement! You have 3 real options with both parties today that you did not have in '12. Unfortunately, Sanders believes in government control. At least he is honest and not deceitful in his Socialist opinions. He is clearly outside the party will as the Democratic party continues to solicit a Hillary bid.
The 'Non Establishment' movements we see from main stream parties ARE related to those of us who courageously spoke truth across this land? (All of us who walked arm in arm for this cause lost by the way).
Where do you think this division of 'Establishment' versus 'Non Establishment' came from in 2016? The parties are hearing our message backed by a growing number of citizens. 'Inside' Candidates found courage to go vocal with the message delivered by us bolder 'Outsiders'. However, the main stream party is still rejecting the message. They still don't believe people like Sanders, Trump, or Carson really have a chance to win because they don't hear their names echoed by 'their circles'. Newsflash: 'Establishment Circles' don't mingle with 'Outside Circles' (See North Omaha). You are not hearing the beat on the street. I have walked with both circles and I assure you the sentiment is real and is motivated by citizen justice.
Lessons from Dr. King to 'Activists'
Dr. King stood alone. He often fought the battles within his movement. The average Joe will believe that most of the people throwing rocks will be external threats—the 'Goliaths' of the world. However, detractors often come from inside a movement. TD Jakes cites this reality in the civil rights movement in the sermon below. Secular driven opponents maybe surprised that many of my detractors were Evangelical Republicans. Surely God is Loyal Republican!
Dr. Carson is learning this message first hand as he works his own "Non Establishment" faith based campaign. He has internal detractors as well. They are abandoning him as Dr. King was abandoned. However, he spoke truth to power and is why he has garnered so many faith based followers. His statements on liberty/justice resonate in the heart. He is a modern day Dr. King that many are abandoning on the inside and outside as they seek out a more "Popular and Zesty" candidate. He shouldn't worry about the herd. He should keep preaching truth. I keep praying for Dr. Carson to stay strong.
These fact patterns of rejection from the inside are similar to the line of King David. We learn in 1st and 2nd Samuel challenges most change agents like David will face. Most people have an obvious 'enemy' similar to Goliath. The average citizen 'Herd' will identify Goliath as Trump for the GOP Establishment/Democrats or Hillary/Obama for Republicans. The establishment has a way of building a "Goliath" in the media for their enemies. However, I promise you the vast majority of the herd will be blind to the 'Sauls' that are working against the modern day 'Davids' as they take on the real Goliath of the people (Government and Corporate Oligarchs).
Most ordinary followers will clamor for their leader to battle Goliath. They will look for a valiant fighter, a man with great armor, or an established leader to engage the fight. Most followers will think a Shepherd boy is not one to look for to defeat a big enemy like Goliath.
Friends, God is the real hope. He will use the inexperienced, the young, the ill equipped in earthly armor, and the ones with GREAT FAITH to fight his battles for justice. Don't forget David's brothers' views of David before the fight. People close to you will abandon you too! Acceptance/Popularity/Winning will always be the herds crutch. Herd dying a figurative death in the desert has often been their outcome as well.
Once an earthly battle is secured, the powerful elite often will turn against their army/warriors to consolidate the power and glory for their benefit (See Donors/Party/Saul). In fact, some 'Kings' you fight for will often pursue you to a level that you run to your former enemy to survive! (See David fleeing Saul to live with the Philistines whom he once killed!)
Rookies know Goliath is the enemy. Amateurs know Saul (whom David fought for) was the King to pursue David's death after he beat Goliath for the sake of his benefit. Savants know Saul pursued David to a level that David was forced to live with the Philistines– his original enemy! Loving your enemy is a real lesson God teaches us. David gives us one solid reason on why! Lesson: Most rookies are familiar with Goliath but blind to the threats Saul or Kings they fight for will present to the warriors of truth!
We should be leery of Kings. Better yet, we should learn from Samuel that our clamor for a King is wrong in the first place.
God ordained government. Our founders looked to his guide to design civil structure. In my opinion, free will IS in his design. Freedom of religion IS our cause for all people. Like us, God will not deny himself the pleasure of being selected by another free thinking human being for love (my opinion). We have the freedom of religion. We have the choice to choose God.
The lessons don't stop there! 'Davids' will often take on more than one enemy at the same time to create positive change for their people. Let that be a lesson from this blog. 'Davids' will have to take on battles for the people and flee being pursued by leadership he fights on behalf of. We need to teach leaders how to battle two enemies at once and gain a perspective that does not fixate on one threat only. Please see a real modern day preacher in the spirit of MLK below. We need more TD Jakes. Minutes 50 to 60 are great on this very subject!
Discrimination in Nebraska
You really don't know what it is like to be discriminated against until you go through it. I do not know what racial discrimination feels like. I do know what political discrimination feels like.
I had a contextual historical understanding of discrimination from textbooks. However, living it was a way different experience. I praise God for it. It has made me a better/stronger/more empathetic leader.
I felt the movement by the 'establishment' first hand as I directly spoke truth to power.
It is not just the Establishment. The population will run too. They desire and need 'acceptance' more than nourishment of truth. Most will overlook the truth for the benefit of a majority identity. They often need to see confirmation with others or on TV. One or two political identities gives our majority a feeling of acceptance. The feeling is exemplified and confirmed by various friendly outlets that exist for both persuasions.
Dr. King teaches us many of individuals, religious denominations, and support circles will abandon us too when we advocate for a new message that is unfamiliar to the masses. Many followed and deserted Dr. King as his movement ebbed and flowed in popularity over time. After his victory, everyone was "Onboard" and believed in his cause from the start. (They like to win). The reality is his movement had stiff resistance before it succeeded.
'Free Institutions' like The Omaha World Herald were the Chief Discriminators. They would not cover my message. They refused to put our campaign in print because I didn't have the money and establishment/party following 'real' candidates have. They actually had a "Fundraising Threshold." Furthermore, their leadership in the political department had "Subjective" rules they employed that warranted coverage. That "Subjective" judgment was a continual moving target. Being on the ballot was an original standard that came and went. It is no secret our campaign clashed on topics that are heralded in the agenda of the main stream political media. Since when does the institution of journalism set the rules for participating and coverage of an election? Guess who else didn't cover North Omaha the night of the debate?
Most in Omaha still don't even know I exist because of OWH and KFAB's first hand discrimination against covering my voice placed there by the Nebraskan citizens. Signatures from 89 of the 93 counties was not resolute enough for these outlets! They would attend little to no events where Mr. Sasse was not present. The citizen voice put on the ballot by Nebraska was not being covered. What made our campaign more astounding is our ballots were 100% volunteer based. We did not pay volunteers to seek out signatures. The free press not covering a citizen initiative should present real fear to the average American. Look outside these sources for independent/non controlled information. God bless those journalists who actually understand their call and have ethics to match their work.
The Lincoln Journal Star refused to cover my message as well. For my national readers, the OWH and LJS control/own most of the content across the state. To the LJS, I was a "Religious Candidate" that was only worth a brief mention. A person of faith can't be capable of solid civil views was their unspoken message from the editorial and leadership board. The one voice in Omaha who did allow my voice "Becka" had this same attitude with me as well due to my beliefs. Full credit to Tom, he still had me on to speak (or argue with) despite his disgust from my openness with my faith.
Advocates against Free Speech and Debate came out against me as well. I was refused by the National Federation of Independent Business (even though I own two companies with 85 employees), The Nebraska Medical Association, the Independent Insurance Association (even though I purchase from "Independent Agents"), and many more from participating in the Senate candidate forums despite the Secretary of State declaring I was a qualified candidate on the ballot. I know Jim and I have opened the door for others in the future based on the blow back they received. I forgive, but I have not forgotten the attitudes and belief system of many of their leaders.
This political discrimination is in on our blood in Nebraska for the benefit of contextual understanding of my national readers. Non-partisans (despite our reputation as a Non Partisan state) are given different ballots to vote in the primary. We are denied votes for specific offices. We don't have the same voice in our primary as partisans do. Again, 1950 is alive and well in Nebraska.
My cause of religious liberty (now mainstream), Constitutional designed economic justice (becoming main stream), and citizen liberty (still fringe with more Libertarian candidates) were being pushed against by the powers at be. I was even denied to speak at a political club in my own church run by older establishment Republicans. Rejection by "Main Stream" followers is very common if you start a new cause. Get ready activists. Discrimination will come your way. Embrace it! Don't attempt change if you need popular acceptance to survive!
To top it all off, I was discriminated against by organizations I have been a long time voice "For". I was evaluated as having a higher "Pro-Life" score then many of my political opponents. However, I was not endorsed by the most influential Pro-Life group because I was an "I" and not an "R". Dr. King would have thrilled to know I was being judged by the letter behind my name and not the content of my character.
You know what? I praise God for all the discrimination! My depth of empathy grew leaps and bounds. My eyes were awakened to Institutional and herd behavior. My leadership ability and my dependence on God began to thrive. I learned how to walk alone (although my key circle of volunteers, wife, and key people in my faith circle gave me the encouragement and nurture an activist must have). I'm grateful for the experience. I'm eternally grateful for the support structure that walked with me through my toughest trial to date.
Friends, Rejoice! Much was achieved for God in our campaign! Our voice was not silenced, although not widely heard. The letters I have received from many of you encouraged my soul. Lives were changed. My key volunteers did not drift. God did not abandon me. We got the money we needed to travel and speak our message. We got many news outlets to cover the Citizen message. Praise God for what happened! New followers are now hearing the message in the mainstream. Praise God for those around the country that sacrificed for the same message. Praise God for Dr. King. His encyclopedia of life experience helped give me a road map to navigate a culture working against a message (more my "I" identity) that was new and radical to old ears.
Like Dr. King, we had our supporters and our people who bucked the trend. Many people believe in fairness, equal opportunity, and free speech. The Cattlemen's, The Nebraska Chamber, NET, Americans for Corporate Growth, UNL, Concordia, the citizens of Stanton/Seward, media like KRVN, etc. rose up and offered a platform for the citizen voice. God bless them!
As for Omaha, KETV was the only televised news station in Omaha to put me on the airwaves. However, Jenkins (the other "I") and I had to split 10 minutes while each partisan candidate was given their own private 30 minute episode in the same time slot. Progress in Omaha…Yes. Equality….NO! ….and KETV was the strongest TV voice for Independents! I really appreciate their Independent approach to issues.
This is establishment and partisan Nebraska. Our state likes those handouts given by the government for our businesses too. Nebraska GOP free markets usually equate to farmer hand outs. Getting insurance coverage was big progress and sacrifice for many around the state. We as a state are in the initial stages of divorcing business from government. Baby Steps! For my national readers this maybe one of the most establishment states in the union. Business handouts have been a way of life for many. It is no surprise our base is slow to drift from those who have put a check in the mailbox.
I encourage every citizen to find and watch the NET debate online. This was the only televised debate in this state. (1950 I know). You will see why I was called the "Constitutional" candidate by Scottsbluff media. I was called a Reagan candidate by the Kearney Hub. Most of you didn't even know I or the message existed!
I'm not saying I was the only Constitutional candidate. I can say I was the only one who offered a Constitutional debate with the eventual winner. That debate was declined. Let's just say David challenged the Goliath of the donor class to the Constitutional debate. Goliath would not show. Goliath refused three times to meet and discuss platform stances. My 50k rock was willing to go to battle against the $5 million voice. The battle was declined so our message was not heard by many in the public square.
Discrimination by Powerful Institutions Are 'First Signs' that Justice is at Work
More intense and deliberate discrimination is the evidence of a true movement for citizen justice.
The media is often controlled or act in a way to maintain access to the current "Power" structure. They did with Dr. King. They are doing it again today.
See media control against King, Gandhi, the Iranian Prime Minister of the 50's and on and on. The mainstream media/the institutions of power (becoming one) have always silenced progress. Larger threats of Individual justice have usually coincided with the centralization of money, media, and political figures into a limited circle. This is happening in 2016 America. This is definitely Nebraska.
Unfortunately, our country now believes the candidate that skipped 10+ debates is going to be the key figure to pioneer a renewal of debate in the Senate. Journalists continue to overlook the 10+ Senate debates he missed to substantiate the conduct behind this claim! Why does the Nebraska media fail to ask a basic and obvious question?
Watch our historically document debates at WatsonforSenate if you want to see who originated the promotion of 'Vigorous debate in the Senate' idea. Watch our debates on WatsonforSenate to see who did not debate the other candidates 10 plus times when every other candidate was present.
I don't believe the genuineness of his statements. I'm fearful his donors are trying to own this non establishment message for their benefit. Scripts and speeches are his mode. Off the cuff talks from the heart are not his specialty. Prepared lines and speeches is Donor Party 101. Donors owning a popular message for their power is not a new practice. It is rooted in the history of the world.
I hope I'm wrong.
Furthermore, does the citizen really believe the "Anti-Establishment Washington Outsider" claim as well? Examine his background of his life. If I worked for President Bush, was Chief of Staff in the House, attended Ivy League and Oxford……I would not call myself an "Anti Establishment Washington Outsider". Citizens must get better at watching the walk and ignoring the talk. I have more points…but you get the trend.
I'm glad Senator Sasse is now talking a good game. However, the walk when the votes actually win will be his true test. Part of my role maybe speaking uncomfortable truth into his job and reminding him people are actually watching what he does over what he says. Let this paragraph be a message of accountability and encouragement to Ben. As a point of clarity, I was told by his Chief of Staff to not call him directly. I'm honoring that wish or I'd correct him directly instead of going public as I demonstrated during the election. My best advice to Senator Sasse is that he needs people around him to hold him accountable and not just sing his praises. I'm afraid he has more of the later and less of the former in his inner circle.
I do like much of his message. It is similar to mine. I hope parts of it win for the sake of the people. However, I know it takes true conviction and courage to see citizen justice through. I know he struggles with citizen/party/donor balance. He needs encouragement to follow the will of the people. Therein lies his success and legacy. Therein lies the temptation in failure to make a difference.
I know it takes the journey of trials like TD Jakes illustrates to see a cause thru.
To his credit, I know he has passed personal trials that far surpass mine (His medical battles with his wife surely built his character). I really admire him for this battle. However, I have yet to see political trials come his way. I pray he experiences political trials so he can grow to win the bigger issues for the people. Stump speeches on unattended topics are inspiring but the progress is in the details on the bills that hit the floor. I believe he can be the answer if he surrounds himself with the right people to hold him accountable. I love Ben, despite the appearance of this section. I really do. I know we share the same Savior. I wish him well. However, I will hold him continue to hold him accountable to what he says and does. For the sake of our faith and his work, I would implore him to have his walk begin to match his talk.
Our Pastors Must Become Bolder
Pastors must become bolder too. See TD Jakes sermon at the bottom for a good example. (PS—watch these sermons North Omaha if we want to rebuild a strong church to retake North Omaha for 'good'. Soft pastors that go along with pro-abortion need some time with God.)
Our American founding was ripe with pastors speaking truth against laws that violated "Transcendent Laws". America prevailed over the tyranny of the day. Not ironically, the majority of 'Declaration' signers had Seminary degrees. There is a reason the majority of our Founders were grounded in teachings of God's word as they designed a liberty oriented government for the benefit of We the People.
Fast forward to Nazi Germany for Pastoral failure. Pastors seeking 'to be left alone' or turning the other way in Germany were far too common. They mistakenly removed their eye from the public square. When the war ended, the legal defense of many Nazi's was –'We were just following the law'. Christians claimed this defense as well.
This defense did not hold up in International court. The citation of the court was profound and flies into the face of modern day America. Transcendent law is superior to human law! The Verdict of Nuremberg is Clear. 'Life' is a Transcendent law. They are valid claims against American law today.
Rewind to the civil war/civil rights era. Our brilliant Constitution was flawed. It was laced with thorough and well defined laws protecting slavery and unequal rights at the ballot box. The Constitutional arguments were very clear, concise, and complete to keep these practices alive and well. The Constitution would not have passed without these citations. However, the Constitutional laws around slavery could not and would not hold. Why?
Transcendent laws are superior to human laws designed in the Constitution. Inalienable rights given to us by our Creator are superior to human constructed (slavery) laws. In my opinion, Transcendent laws will find a way to win in the end. Why? I believe they are the laws ordained by our Creator. Get on board or get out of the way!
All arguments of the Confederacy were not wrong by the way. The South had good arguments for state control (non-slavery based) over federal laws. This was a superior Constitutional argument they made. They had concerns over liberty over the capture of those rights to the national level. They were just and right in many of these points.
Unfortunately, they married a superior cause (Individual Liberty/States' Rights) with an inferior cause (Slavery). Good arguments like States' rights fail when married to inferior laws that fly in the face of Transcendent laws. That was the mistake of the Confederacy. Their Constitutional arguments were solid. Their understanding of Transcendent Laws went missing.
Friends, good laws lose when coupled with laws that are not just.
This is the lesson the GOP is starting to wake up to. These are the root of actions that have failed the GOP for years (a big reason why I left). They are losing 'good' positions by advocating for unjust 'bad' laws for donors. They pass it off as 'the way it is' in Washington. Newsflash: 'The Way It Is' doesn't work either.
Most importantly for the righteous, remember Transcendent laws! They are superior to human laws. Compliance officers will follow any law. We have many compliance officers in Church. We have Compliance officers in our military. Both groups need to be reminded that they are to obey 'Lawful' orders that are consistent with the Constitution.
We need to empower people of faith. They are Constitutionally empowered to disobey Unconstitutional Law! They need to walk a road between Selma and Montgomery to embrace what a civil disobedience walk against powers of the state might feel like.
Furthermore, we need to see protestants show up to the abortion protests. Conservatives have let Progressives dominate Constitutional rights to Protest! We must lock arms with our Catholic brothers and sisters already doing the work in key areas like abortion!
We must empower ALL people of faith with the truth that God's Transcendent laws are superior to Human laws! We must fight for laws consistent with God's design. Life is a Transcendent Law as recognized in the International courts. We must empower Pro-Lifers that are afraid to 'lose' with the knowledge that God wins in the end. The convictions of our heart are in full view of God. We must ignore what man thinks! We must express our Constitutional rights! We must express and exercise our religious rights! We must advocate for truth in our civil laws!
In Summary
Fast forward to today.
We have numerous human laws being written, affirmed, and upheld by our government. More dangerously, we have numerous "Orders", "Rulings", "Laws" that are being imposed in an Unconstitutional spirit on the people.
Don't go pointing the fingers only at Obama GOP (He is a horrendous offender). The first calling of the Constitution is to Establish Justice. Justice IS "Equality Before the Law". This is the first digression the GOP makes in building law. Examine those laws written for donors. Is this equality before the law for the American citizen?
We have a Constitutional right to ignore laws/rulings that violate the Constitution. You can ignore GOP claims that their #1 job is to protect this country. You can remind them that their #1 job is to defend the Constitution of which they are not doing. Physical Defense is a subset to their primary mission of defending the Constitution. It is a modern day message built in popularity that speaks to the "Security Need" of the masses but demonstrates the Constitutional ignorance of their oath.
Democrats, your President is as Unconstitutional as they go. Your silence is not forgotten either.
Unfortunately, we have many pastors soft in speech leading the sheep to a 'soft' cloud. They do not know the Constitution. They want you to read the Bible but many have failed to read the Constitution. Please remind them of their dual citizenship!
Many pastors remain silent on issues in the Bible germane to THEIR government! They lie in intimidation to governmental laws in contrast to God's Transcendent Laws and American Constitutional law. We need your voices Spiritual Leaders for the benefit of this country!
Many spiritual leaders fear the 501 (c) (3) threats. Be like Dr. King! Ignore LBJ threats over your rights to YOUR pulpit, to YOUR speech given to you by GOD, to YOUR responsibility from God to lead your sheep on issues of mercy AND justice. Dr. King overcame LBJ. You shall too! LBJ's human laws have fallen to Dr. Kings advocating of Transcendent Laws already! Speak! Be Constitutional!
Have you lost faith on who provides for your church? Does the 501(c)(3) make mana rain down from heaven? Do your sheep know where their provision comes from? Your sheep are watching your lead!
Do they believe they have a voice because you have yours? Do they believe human action is needed for their provision? Do your sheep believe their speech has to be limited and contained? What message from God are you communicating to the sheep? We don't need a civil voice leading the sheep. However, we may need a kick in the butt from a civil voice to the spiritual voices to wake up! The correction can go both ways in times like these!
Will Pastors continue to be silent like the pastors of Germany with serious sin that will condemn any nation? Will spiritual leaders lead their people like Moses did out of an oppressive Egyptian government? Will spiritual leaders preach truth to government like Moses did? Will Pastors teach them the lessons of David? Will Pastors teach their sheep they should expect attacks by internal and external forces for movements of justice? Will pastors recognize these detractors inside their church walls? Pastors sleep too.
Our founding father pastors were not silent. Bonhoffer was not silent. MLK was not silent. We should not be either.
Transcendent laws shall reign! Transcendent laws need a voice! We need your voice Spiritual Leaders of America to shape our civil laws for our Republic.
TD Jake's Spot On Sermon — Leadership
Friends, I want to close with a sermon from a preacher I admire. In my opinion, TD Jakes is cut from the powerful influential cloth that Dr. King was cut from. I'm as white as they come. I dance white. I laugh white. I really jump white. However, I like a soul church when I need to just "let the word go". TD is one of my favorites when I need a good sermon from the soul. I love TD. He is not perfect. However, that is not the standard God has for either of us!
This attached sermon is on "Leadership". I present it to future leaders when I see potential. If you are a true leader you will resonate with the truth in his message. I think this message on leadership will exponentially resonate with the activist. We have 'been there' if you have fought a real battle for pioneering progress.
TD in minute 1 hits the primary problem of Americans and where they look for leaders. His speech at minute 37 to 38 will tell you the reality of the problem of being "Popular", being a true leader, and being held captive to fear. Minutes 46 to 48 will teach you to be a leader and be comfortable with controversy ("Which means minority position among "Herd" followers). Watch why people will ditch you at minute 1:16 in your cause. He will teach you to identify all types of people and how they can help or work against you.
Minutes 50 to 58 will teach you to fight people on two fronts (Like David, Dr. King, etc.). Don't forget Dr. King was dumped by his denomination as well because he was controversial and didn't speak establishment values held by the majority of his denomination. I resonate with that as an ex Republican!
Remember, the Denomination came back to Dr. King in the end after his rejection! The message from "Main Stream" GOP is coming back to true Constitutional leaders as we speak. It is unfortunate many former party members like myself had to abandon the party to preach and stand for truth against the wishes of the Ivory Tower. God be the glory. I'm glad many of us did!
Read their message in '16 and our message from '14. Note their similarity. 'THE' message is being adopted by the establishment as we speak. Just today I heard my own representative preach a new message of transparency in medical prices, a need for rebirth of American manufacturing, and a renewal of civic institutions to breed unity. Where did you first hear that message Watson followers?
My alarm remains. Are these speeches crafted by the establishment? Are they not authentic? Is this being preached to consolidate power? We must crusade on. WE MUST SEE NON ESTABLISHMENT PEOPLE IN OFFICE to see this Constitutional mission through for the people! Activists—keep rocking the boat!
Taking on the establishment, speaking truth, outlaying what real justice looks like, treating all people with respect like those in North Omaha, was a "boat" I was called to rock. I'm happy to do my part. All God's children need love despite what they believe. All God's children need to do their part to serve his creation.
In the end, I praise God for how I was treated. It was part of my journey into maturity. I tried to knock over the money changers contaminating the temple of the church and government. I'm glad I did! They distort justice in our Constitution!
I encourage you to be courageous like Dr. King in 'Your' movement. This is America. We need the talent God created in you exercised! Don't follow the herd. Be true to God's word and follow his path he gave you to walk to serve others! Don't worry about popularity! Don't worry about winning! Worry about being a genuine advocate for truth. Worry about exercising the gifts he entrusted in you! I promise you that your gifts if exercised under God's thumb will grow! Mine did.
Sinful? Made mistakes? So have I. So did Dr. King. So have you. God uses the average and imperfect like us. Rise up and be used for his purpose. God Bless Dr. King and God bless you. We got work to do! Happy MLK day! Learn from one of America's great leaders!
Love You Nebraska! Love You TD!
Posted in Constitution, Pro-Life, Race, Religious Liberty | By Todd Watson
October 16, 2015
Does it bother you when elected officials play the 'blame game' but are participatory in the cause of the problem? Does it bother you when Senators are silent when platform issues are being debated on the floor of the US Senate? It bothers me.
In recent weeks, Senator Fischer's criticisms of POTUS (President of the United States) have grown in frequency and intensity. It is time to set the record straight and hold Nebraska's elected officials accountable for their role in foreign policy failure.
Senator Fischer continues to badger Obama on his failed Syrian rebel strategy. I will avoid the severity of personal attacks she employs. I will keep my criticism to the facts of foreign policy failure and silence.
Senator Fischer is responsible for poor decisions on national security. She APPROVED the failed Syrian Rebel strategy she is currently mocking. She is not alone. Every Republican in Nebraska authorized Obama's Syrian strategy except one. Former Representative Terry and I were the only conservatives to go on the record and say "No" to Obama's Syrian strategy.
To make it worse, Senator Fischer and other Republicans are passive in taking legislative action to stop the Iranian treaty after MATERIAL "Side Deals" have emerged and remain undisclosed by the President. This is not the courage we sorely need in 2015.
Furthermore, "Self-Imposed Moratoriums of Silence" on the floor of the US Senate in the face of evil is self-evident.
King, Lincoln, Kennedy, Netanyahu, and my personal favorite Bonhoeffer warned us against silence we are now witnessing.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer — 'Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.'
Let's examine the votes and multiple instances of silence-
The Factual Record on Syria
During the 2014 US Senate debates, the three debating Senate candidates (Domina, Jenkins, and I) answered fair, honest, and tough questions.
There were two questions we were consistently asked in September 2014.
Do you support the President's air strikes?
Do you support arming the Syrian rebels?
All three debating candidates supported the air strikes. However, candidate Domina and I were the only candidates who went on the record and objected to arming the Syrian rebels.
Speaking for myself, I objected because my contextual historical knowledge understood that arming third party rebels was a dangerous and ineffective strategy.
Senator Sasse did not debate the question. Silence.
Senator Fischer voted "Yes" to Obama's Syrian strategy to arm, fund, and train Syrian rebels to fight this growing conflict.
Unfortunately, the popular and winning 'Yes' position would turn tragic for America and the Syrian people. We must learn from and correct the lessons of history if we are going to move America forward.
OWH – Story on Unilateral Approval of Arming Syrian Rebels (Except Lee Terry)
The "Great Debate" in Hastings. Minutes 44 thru 52 Highlight the Syrian Rebel Position
What Has Been the Result of a "Yes" Vote For Syrian Rebel Support?
Senator Fischer would like you to believe this is entirely Obama's fault. However, the record is very clear. Senator Fischer authorized and blessed this disastrous Presidential strategy on the floor of the US Senate to deal with the problems in Syria. The authorization and choice of an inadequate strategy has lead to an epic crisis America must confront.
This is a massive failure in discernment and strategy by our current delegation. Obama's perpetual failure of plans in the Middle East should have brought skepticism into authorizing an additional "Obama" strategy. Even Dave Domina, the most liberal candidate from Nebraska, knew this was a bad strategy from the President. Although I seldom agreed with Domina during the debates, you can see my visual affirmation of his position in Hastings at the time of our initial disclosures. This was an important decision of magnitude. Unity for National Security was displayed.
My "NO" to the Syrian rebel decision is a very different on the record position between me and other conservatives like Senator Fischer.
Senator Sasse did not debate or take a position. His silence was a foreshadowing of his conduct his first year. Key issues to his platform (abortion, border security, Obamacare) went unaddressed as well with a "self-imposed moratorium" of silence. Monumental debates on the floor of the US Senate came and went without a peep. Pledges of 100 day legislation went idle. Nebraska observed this conduct of silence first hand and overwhelming approved of this behavior in their vote.
Senator Sasse and Silence – LJS 10/07/2015
Culpability belongs to the media who filled the silence with endless stories of adoration. They "swoon" to those receiving national media coverage. Journalistic action for policy disclosure should have been the aim. To make it worse, the media proactively silenced the bold and vocal voice put on the ballot by the Nebraska people because I continually mentioned a profane 3 letter word in the media "G-O-D." The mere fact spiritual people can have intelligent opinions on civil issues is still a concept that is hard to comprehend in the secular media driven world.
Moving on, Senator Fischer stated the consensus opinion after the vote. "Doing nothing in the face of a growing threat is simply not an option. It's important for Congress and the president to show the world that the United States will stand up and lead."
'Leading' is the last word to describe American action in Syria. America's 'shoot from the hip' conflict strategy authorized by the US Senate was a horrendous approach.
The wisdom and consequences of that first monumental decision to have LARGE and immediate ramifications are now on the record for America and Nebraska to examine. The astronomical consequences of these actions are visible throughout the world.
America currently supports 4 to 5 armed rebels! What a strategy! How about the Huskers play defense with 4 players? How about the Huskers give Pierson-El to the Gophers to play against us this weekend?
Senator Fischer's Formal Statement on Arming Rebels
This specific recruitment of rebels only garnered 60 recruits. Of the 60 recruits garnered by this strategy, only 4 or 5 rebels remain as expressed by our military leaders. 5 Syrian rebels…ISIS must be trembling! Is this the "Peace through Strength" strategy authorized by Republicans? Let the "5 Rebel Strength Fact" (or 60 if you want to give full credit) sink in to understand how poor of a strategy this was.
Unfortunately, the situation has grown worse. Ben Swann and other respected journalists cite that our equipment, training, etc. from this authorization is now being utilized by ISIS against our interests. This was my ultimate fear of what would happen!
Lives are now dying over this decision.
If Democrats could spell responsibility they would turn on Obama. If Republicans really acted with accountability, they would hold Senator Fischer and every other Republican responsible for their authorization of a horrendous Syrian rebel strategy.
Instead, we will be stuck with two failing parties whose strategy is to point at each other and assign failure for the Middle East to gain a "Default" vote for their party. Problem solvers remain missing.
Senator Fischer's Statement on "4 to 5" Rebels
The Truth of the Middle East – 2 Videos to Educate the Average Voter
This is the truth of the Middle East Story (WARNING: GRAPHIC ISIS VIOLENCE — BLURRED OUT – NOT TOO EXCESSIVE)
The above link is the best narrative from a REAL journalist on what is going on in the Middle East. (Warning: It is not what the media normally spins).
The link below is probably the best "Top Level View" of what is currently going on in Syria. Most Americans are confused (understandable) with all the different groups, names, and allies in the region. I think this piece will help you better understand the situation and different parties at play.
Furthermore, most of the American people are conditioned to think about wars within the context of nations. America must relearn sectarian vocabulary. Understanding the Shia and Suni difference is more relevant to understanding Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and IS.
The video below was created by "VOX". Despite many of VOX's beliefs, I still believe it narrates the basic story accurately for the average viewer.
I hope these two stories help clarify the situation for those that are confused.
The Modern Day Story of Syria (Read Daniel for one of the Ancient Stories)
What Americans Need to Learn. My Proactive Recommendations to Our Problems.
1. America started the problems in the Middle East by drifting from our defined Constitution. Stop drifting!
America has lost focus of DOMESTIC Tranquility and Providing the Common DEFENSE. America should have stayed out of Iraq. Our Constitution was designed to save our blood, money, and toil for the betterment of Americans. America needs to practice self-control. America needs to ignore the wishes of large military complex donors that profit from engagements. The American people should focus on Providing the Common Defense and Not Providing the Common Offense.
Observe the Constitution!
2. America's problem is compounded by our foreign policy being dictated by 'Big Oil'. Foreign oil resources need to be formally removed as a 'national interest' motive in foreign policy. There is a reason the media will broadcast endless propaganda on Iraq and downplay massive genocide in Rwanda. We need to ignore oil interests who benefit from overseas wells. We need 100% North American sourced oil and remove ourselves from blood money that is stained in Mid-East oil. We need to ignore Republican donors' large interests in Mid-East oil. We need to overcome Democratic attempts to stop domestic production. Let's start drilling and stop importing!
3. The Military Complex profits from "Double Sales" with the confiscation of our weapons by third party fighting forces. The follow up sale is reselling more goods to our government to defeat third party forces armed with our weapons. This "Double Sale" cycle is a habitual pattern for the US government. We give weapons to Bin Laden, Saddam, Contras, and the list goes on through covert government action. This policy often requires us to fund larger military machines to destroy opponents who possess arms WE SUPPLIED! We must recognize the military complex (donors) create conflict of interest in our elected members decision making process. We need our representatives to think Constitutional defense before donor base!
Furthermore, a costly mega war is brewing. This potential war will be more costly in needs because our government has now enabled a well funded Iran through horrendous diplomatic action. I'm convinced Iran will be using the $100 billion+ of additional inflows for research and the purchase of strategic weapons.
Ask yourself, would America need a larger or smaller defense budget if ISIS didn't have the equipment/training America provided the Rebels through the Syrian authorization? Would we need a larger military force if American diplomatic action did not free $100 billion+ to flow to the Iranian government? We need to stop allowing our enemies access to large scale resources to purchase weapons! Senator Fischer needs a larger defense budget because she is enacting or failing to act diplomatically in foreign policy. More on this later…
4. Our legislative branch has to debate what wars we engage in. We have a soft legislative branch that defers to the President to dictate military engagements. The Constitution authorizes our legislative branch to declare a war. 1941 was the last time Congress had the guts to own a declaration. We have lacked Congressional leadership with regards to military engagements for over 70 years. We need to demand Congress authorize our engagements….not the President!
Furthermore, the power of the purse (the true power of Congress) can dictate the size and scope of how our President will fight. Instead, we have numerous puppies in Congress led by horrendous leaders laying down their Constitutionally assigned roles. They habitually defer to the President on issues the Constitution says are germane to the legislative branch. Both parties have deferred to Republican and Democrat Presidents on engagement/war declarations. They have been followers and not leaders. We need our elected legislative leaders to follow the Constitution.
5. I cited a different mindset that needs to be incorporated in my blog on September 7, 2015 featuring an insightful TED talk on the mentality of insurgents. Check it out. We are going to have to work together with different mindsets and skills to improve the situation in the Middle East. Defeating the enemy is not enough. Filling the vacuum must be solved to bring a stronger sense of stability in the Middle East.
6. Look for leaders not afraid to debate. Lindsey Graham (not my candidate for the record) is the only leader to offer a specific war strategy with specific details in the GOP Presidential debates.
Most of the other candidates are ducking the details of their war strategy. One of the most important questions in a Presidential debate is how they would organize and win a war. If you are unable to show leadership in debate on this topic….you will not show decisive leadership as Commander In Chief.
We need leaders. Inept leadership is exactly what we are witnessing when a Presidential candidate has no strategy to lead an engagement/war. We must demand our next President outlay their strategy before they are elected.
Understanding the Presidential candidate conflict strategy will give voters a "Yes" or "No" option. Subsequently, their Congressional candidates will have a black/white option on if they will declare the war AND fund the strategy outlined by their preferred Presidential candidate. The voter should have the choice in picking a strategy to WAGE a WAR. The voter should have a choice with their Congressional representatives to DECLARE AND FUND THE WAR. This is how we will achieve representative government.
7. We need to elect decisive and strong leaders. Period.
This is the crux of the accountability report. I have written more for your benefit to maximize the money I've been given to spend on Facebook to educate Nebraska. If you wish to read further (I realize this is not brief), I am blogging on these additional related topics:
1. President Trump cites caution in future offensive engagements
2. Senator Fischer's Passivity in Budget Compromise.
3. Is Senator Fischer Conservative?
4. Iran Tests Precision Missile. The Similar Fact Pattern to Nazi Germany
5. Russian Aggression. Putin is Providing the Leadership Lacking From Our President and Congress
6. The Consequences of Being Afraid to debate
7. Funding Defense
8. Closing thoughts as a Civil Independent
Presidential Candidate Trump Now Cites Caution in Future Engagements
It is great to hear Presidential Candidate Trump echo an approach Ron Paul, Rand Paul, and I advocate for. We need more defense and less offense.
America's "Proneness to Offense" lies in our sensitivity to evil dictators portrayed by the media. Americans love to pin their anger on one face (cue Media Evil Dictator Picture) and engage an offensive war. Americans need to evolve and focus on defense. In my personal opinion, foreign policy needs to return to focusing on a balance of power in a region. I believe we need to do a better job in understanding the chaos America creates when we disrupt existing power by going on offense in an area that does not enhance worthy national interests (please exempt International Oil as an 'Interest').
We need to be more sensitive to the greater evil waiting in the wings of an evil dictator. Our removal of "Organized Evil" creates an environment of chaos where "Non Organized Evil" can thrive and inflict greater damage. Pick your poison. "Organized Evil" with a more stable/non-imperialistic history is often the wiser choice in foreign policy when two evil options are at play.
Senator Fischer's Passivity in Budget Compromise
Senator Fischer is compounding the problem in the Middle East. SHE WOULD NOT SUPPORT Senator Cruz's amendment to defund the implementation of the Iranian deal from the continuing operations vote. Since the originally understood Iran treaty failed to be blocked, NEW AND SUBSTANTIAL CONTRACT LANGUAGE has surfaced that fundamentally changed the agreement as understood by the Senate.
Why has Senator Fischer not taken bold substantive action with the revelations of new self inspection knowledge? She mistakenly stated "Self-Inspect" was not true at a Chadron town hall in August. Unfortunately, we have learned the self inspect citations are true as the first samples were turned over by Iranian officials late last month. Should we not reconsider the ACTUAL treaty being offered with "Self Inspect" language?
President Obama was caught in another lie. At the passage of the ORIGINAL deal he stated in BOLD fashion, "Iran has agreed to the most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regimes……This deal is not based on trust, it is based on unprecedented verification."
I trust these self inspections as much as I trust a "Change in Behavior" proclamation from our 2 political parties.
This deal could not be trusted from the start. However, based on new "Self-Inspection" language it would be hard for any rational official to back the actual treaty (Not the one they originally voted for based on lies from the administration).
The ACTUAL treaty is clearly not based on, "Robust, intrusive, and transparent inspections." as promised by the President. We need a new vote based on a fully disclosed treaty to honor the Constitution.
In the wake of this new information, Senator Fischer remained silent in supporting a new amendment to strip enforcing the Iran Deal from the continuing resolution. In addition, the establishment failed at bringing the NEW TREATY WITH SUBSTANTIAL SIDE DEALS to a vote. Passivity at its worse. Our National security interests will suffer as a result.
Based on this passivity in the face of new unprecedented danger and her authorization of a failing Syrian strategy, our national security has been placed in danger.
National Security Aside….Is Senator Fischer Even An Advocate for Conservatism?
Putting National Security aside, is she even an advocate for conservatism by voting for a continuing resolution to run up the debt WITHOUT A SINGLE CUT AND 100% FUNDING of Planned Parenthood?
What proclaimed conservative can support a singular bill that fails national security, social conservatism, and fiscal conservatism at the same time?
I'm entirely fed up with the National Republican Party and their false claims to be advocates of conservatism.
When will Senator Fischer say "No"? When will she say "Enough"?
We have watched Senator Fischer authorize and fund the Rebels in 2014 that enabled a world crisis. We watch Senator Fischer vote "Yes" and continue to fund an out of control government and Planned Parenthood in 2015. We watch Senator Fischer fail to take up the amendment that will withhold funds from a "Self Inspect" Iranian treaty. We watch as our Senator's passivity allows $100+ Billion to flow to Iran to fund their initiatives. I could keep going…..
What will be the travesty in the December continuing resolution? What will her passivity bring to America's land in 2016? What is her lasting contribution to America her first three years that jumps to mind? What will it take for a continuing resolution to be stopped by Senator Fischer and her Republican Allies? What is it going to take for her to get tough and stand for principles? Can she win ONE concession from Democrats in a continuing resolution "Compromise?"
(PS–The Democrats may have the worst "Compromising" behavior in the history of American politics)
Senator Fischer…I will pay you a few compliments to keep this balanced. You are great taking pictures with the kids. You are great taking pictures with the Nebraska industry groups that fund your campaign. Your social graces are much stronger than mine. You read the scripts crafted by party leadership forcefully on the floor. You articulate accurate frustrations with Obama. You make the casual Republican comfortable. You are very friendly and approachable to the public.
However, we are in an era that needs bolder leadership. The educated conservative knows these actions do not 'cut it' in serving our national interest.
I'm encouraging you to put down the passivity and act with convicted and courageous leadership. One statement against Iran, Planned Parenthood, and overspending is not strong enough. We need you to fight and bring these critical issues to the floor. We need you to put up a strong fight for a REAL compromise with some basic conservative influence in a continuing resolution.
I'm encouraging you to embrace independent wisdom to navigate this country into a stronger future. We need courageous conviction to stop the measures that fund ideas, philosophies, and positions you were elected to change/fight/reverse.
The evidence clearly demonstrates you only fight for principles when the media is quiet and/or the stakes for the party are low. Compromising principles for popularity and perceived future power needs to stop!
Nebraskans you need to call your Senator and demand grit. These continuing resolutions have dire consequences for our nation. We have a baby dying every 90 seconds, dangerous threats advancing in Iran, American hostages remaining unaddressed in Tehran, and an additional growing $2 billion of debt a day passing to our kids, etc. etc. etc.
We cannot allow this behavior of our government to continue.
The Latest IRANIAN Test Missile and How it Relates to Nazi Germany
If you study the history of Nazi's testing the "V-2 Rocket", the situation is eerily similar to the fact pattern happening in IRAN. Hitler sold his victims a lie. He was buying time to develop weapons like the V-2 rocket and strengthen his war machine. He would violate his promises and conquer them later after his power was consolidated and his war machine was mature.
90% of the people who knew better remained silent in the face of Hitler's evil…sound familiar? Knowledge without courage is dead.
With this 'context' in mind, Iran continues to chant Death to America and test longer ranged precision missiles AFTER the agreement. America, don't be stupid with formal Iranian promises. Don't believe their lies and ignore the popular rhetoric behind the scenes (or in the 'open' on Twitter). Don't ignore the testing of new precision missiles.
Unfortunately, Senator Fischer is laying down her gun. She lays Nebraska's vote and America's purse on the table. To compound the problem, Senator Sasse remains quiet on the floor of the US Senate until November in a self imposed moratorium of silence.
They both should know better. We need bold action now.
Putin and Russian Aggression. His Leadership. Our Passivity.
In addition to trumpeting Syrian rebel failures, Senator Fischer is sounding the alarm on Putin and Russian Aggression. However, take note America. Putin is showing 100 times the leadership and gumption then both our legislative branch and POTUS COMBINED. He is leading the action in Syria. He is fighting "Our Funded 4 Rebels" as well as those that defected to ISIS leadership. We would be in massive conflict and trouble with Russia if their aggression with our "Funded Rebels" was against a legitimate opposing force America actually believed in.
Meanwhile, our President continues to execute a disastrous policy in the Middle East. To our President's credit, our legislative branch doesn't even have a plan. Their plan is to blame POTUS for his. This is a broken theme by the GOP in healthcare, border control, Syria, healthcare, and on and on.
I know Obama is failing. I knew that before the 855th Facebook post of the year pointing to this fact. My concern is and has always been…What are the Republicans going to do about it? The answer has been nothing.
Republican power in 2016 at the cost of leadership in 2015 for the GOP is the perpetual answer.
Compromising principle for power is and always will be embarrassing. Historical 'context' tells us that control of all 3 branches does not translate into proper use of power (see turn of the century). Demand action today.
The Consequence of Being Afraid to Debate
To make it worse, the Republican voters continue to elect people that are afraid to debate. What do Nebraskans expect to happen on the floor of the US Senate when they elect people that will not DEBATE Pre-Election to an audience of Nebraskans asking tough and fair questions? The voters perpetuate a lack of courage in Congress with their complicit voting record. They vote for those practicing 'silence' they witnessed firsthand.
We need a new POTUS. We need a new legislative branch that will lead. America's future hangs in the balance. Principled platforms of border security, pro-life, and national security cannot endure silence when the subject matter presents itself for vote on the floor of the Senate.
Unfortunately, these (in)actions have now extended another year after the 2014 election where my volunteers and I offered principled change to the status quo. We've continued to move backwards in 2015 with a vacuum of no leadership in the Senate.
Courage…not knowledge…not connections…not campaign war chests… is what we need in Washington at this very hour to save our Country and Constitutional way of life. Unfortunately, our best hope AT THIS VERY HOUR is Senator Fischer and Senator Sasse. Despite my warranted frustration, I encourage you to join me in their encouragement. America needs their action today for a better tomorrow for our children. Call them to take action. They need encouragement to avoid the passivity of their party and the misguided intentions of their leaders. However, hold them accountable for their (in)action in 2018/2020. This country can no longer afford poor and passive leadership from individuals with conservative and constitutional knowledge.
Funding the Military
Senator Fischer now is harping on the President/Democrats for their inability to adequately fund the military. Senator Fischer is right. We do need a strong defense.
However, our defense budget would not have to be that large if Senator Fischer and friends made the right decisions from the start.
Would we need as much money in defense if we didn't have to battle ISIS ARMED WITH OUR EQUIPMENT that Senator Fischer's authorization to the Rebels provided? Would we have to stock a larger force to deal with the potential threats Iran poses with weapons purchased with billions from an evolving Iran treaty Senator Fischer will not readdress?
Finally (the part that is not Senator Fischer's fault), we would not need this level of defensive funds if our country learned to keep our eyes on our own business. We need Americans to trust the Constitution and ignore the media narrative for more world police engagements against "Bad Guys" in a country with even "More Bad Guys" waiting in the wings.
A change in discernment to arm the correct third parties, prohibit the releasing of funds to arm our enemies, and controlling our desire for future world conflict is needed to reestablish Constitutional wisdom for our Republic.
My Closing Thoughts as a Civil Independent
As an Independent, I have a minority opinion both parties could learn from.
Democrats need to stop importing the world to America. Republicans need to stoop trying to export America to the world. We need to focus on America FOR America.
How do we solve these problems created by entrenched parties and their donors? We need a full understanding of the Constitution. We need voters to value courage and principles over connections to greed, knowledge, and media approval.
Unfortunately, I'm afraid change is not coming as rapid as it needs to (although public pressure on our representatives is starting to change civil behavior). The study by KU is right. 41% of people will vote for "Their Party" even if they believe their ideas or candidates are not worthy of support. The conclusion of the study? Winning is more important than right.
In my opinion, "Not Losing" is more important than winning to the voter. I find too many conservative Nebraskans are motivated by fear of failure. Fear of losing trumps advocating for a candidate with an ACTIVE, CLEAR, and VOCAL Constitutional vision. Fear never accomplished anything. Fear is failing us now.
We will reap what we sew as Caleb and Joshua taught us when we vote for 'winning' over 'right'. America is unable to stop evil advancing from either side of the aisle when we vote "Not to Lose", enable passivity, and empower leaders that demonstrate silence.
It is time this losing streak ends. Please call our representatives and demand they get tough. THEY HAVE TO CHANGE TO IMPROVE AMERICA!
What is on the line?
A baby will be terminated every 90 seconds. Our kids debt will rise by $2 billion each day. Iran will gain time to deploy $100 billion to fund their reign of terror.
We cannot afford another day of passivity and silence from our Representatives. Demand action now!
Posted in Military, National Defense, Uncategorized, Veteran Issues | By Todd Watson