text:
John Zmirak received his B.A. from Yale University in 1986, then his M.F.A. in screenwriting and fiction and his Ph.D. in English in 1996 from Louisiana State University. He has taught at Catholic and secular colleges, including Tulane University. He has contributed to American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia and The Encyclopedia of Catholic Social Thought. He has served as Senior Editor of Faith & Family Magazine and a reporter at The National Catholic Register. His new book, The Bad Catholic's Guide to the Catechism, is now available. Check his new blogs and archived columns at The Bad Catholic's Bingo Hall.
Q: So why did the Republicans lose?
A: Their irresponsible policies. We knew, or should have known, that there was no good reason for the U.S. to invade and occupy Iraq; that building a Western liberal democracy in the Muslim world was a narcissistic daydream; that deregulating companies while insuring them as "too big to fail" was a recipe for bankruptcy. We knew better. But back in 2004 or 2006 our leaders had winning slogans, so we winked at their various fibs. Our fellow voters noticed. You can't tout smaller government while trying to police the world—or save free enterprise through crony capitalism. So when Americans were offered a more consistent policy of "socialism in one country," they bought it.
Q: Why should we object to the growth of government?
See Ben Wiker on the core Catholic principle of subsidiarity. The higher the percentage of people's incomes the government takes, the less free we are to do anything it doesn't approve or order. Since our country is by definition secular, every growth of government shrinks the Church. Every dollar you pay in school tax to that public school district where they teach "gay marriage" and hand out condoms is a dollar you can't spend on tuition at St. Philomena High. And so on. How convenient that the administration which millions of Catholics just voted to re-elect is already outlawing nearly any Catholic institution that obeys Church teaching. Now there won't really be any pesky Catholic charities here. They will simply be illegal. We can staple our checkbooks shut.
Q: But shouldn't we try to redistribute more of our national income to the poor?
A: The virtue of Charity, like the virtue of Faith, means nothing when it's coerced. I gain the same divine grace from paying my taxes as some native does when a missionary baptizes him at gunpoint: absolutely none. When a full-third of our income is taxed away before we ever see it, that's a constant occasion of sin when we come face to face with the poor: We already gave at the office.
The growth of government also attacks the Natural virtues. When the State turns large segments of the U.S. population into subjects whose sustenance comes from the government, it obliterates habits of hard work and thrift, making it foolish for unwed fathers to pay for their children, adults to support their parents or neighbors to help each other. This dissolves every bond in human society except that binding the voter and his President. What's driving the growth of government isn't the old-fashioned socialist drive for "justice" (however misconceived). It's the post-1960s ideology that dominates the West: utilitarian hedonism. We seek the greatest number of momentarily pleasant experiences for the greatest number of people, as quickly as possible. Hence we use abortion to bulldoze those tiny fetal speedbumps who block off our ecstasy.
Q: What does Romney's loss mean for the life issue?
That the next two Supreme Court justices, at least, will be fanatical advocates of Roe v. Wade, "gay marriage" and every other social innovation to emerge from Harvard, Yale and Cal-Berkeley. There is no longer any prospect of promoting life issues through the Court — and hence, through presidential politics.
Q: So what should pro-lifers do?
The most effective pro-life leader I know is Jason Jones, the executive producer of Bella and a longtime supporter of the Personhood initiative. As we picked through the post-election rubble Wednesday morning, he reflected:
"Now it's clear we won't have votes to overturn Roe. So we must focus on the sole means left for protecting unborn Americans: a constitutional amendment defining them as persons. Brent Bozell of Triumph magazine argued back in 1973 that we needed to do the long, slow, thankless work needed to push such an amendment through the Congress and the states. It is time we finally get started on that work.
"Precisely because it's detached from economic issues, this amendment would gain support (as the personhood initiatives have) from demographic groups who for simple, tribal reasons (like Boston Irish) will never vote Republican. We saw that the amendment defending traditional marriage did well with minority voters in California.
"Detaching the abortion issue from presidential politics will drain much of the support that unprincipled, pro-business drones like Mitt Romney and Karl Rove have always counted on from social conservatives. Instead, they will have to win our votes on other issues — perhaps by defending traditional marriage, for instance. For too long we have been pawns; we must learn instead to be chess players."
I can't even agree on incest and rape. I've known too many people born from such "wrong conceptions" to claim that they deserve the death penalty for the actions of either parent.
The one troubling case to me is triage- but writing into OUR abortion laws what the anti-life people always forget is the answer: conscience protections for every doctor and nurse (the government has no place in the emergency room).
The problem as I see it is that the pro-life crowd does NOT challenge the pro-abortion crowd nearly enough. With the simple use of the term "pro-choice," they are blurring the line between banning abortion and, for example, overturning the 19th amendment. After-all, the 19th amendment gave women "the right to chose," didn't it? As in, the right to mark a ballot for which candidate they wanted in office.
Now, of course, they love to say, "chose what to do with their bodies," as if banning abortion is tantamount to, say, saying women can't get appendectomies. However, while banning women from getting appendectomies would be unspeakable, it would be just as bad to outlaw the procedure regardless of gender, right? It would prove just as fatal if the ban was on men as well as women, right? And so what about issues where men are banned from "controlling their bodies" just like women? Heroin is illegal for both men and women. I'm a little fuzzy on gun laws, but concealing a weapon on your person is no more or less legal for men than for women as far as I know. Show me I'm wrong, and I'll oppose that double-standard.
Now, another battle cry is that men don't have the right to weigh in on this because they have no stake in it. That, of course, is like saying blind people shouldn't oppose a war because they can't join the army. Of course the blind have the right to oppose a war. Doesn't matter if they're subject to fighting in it. And the same is true of men with opinions on abortion.
Finally, while I did vote for Romney partly because of this issue, along with Obama's insistence that schools like Georgetown MUST provide contraception (for women, mind you, I don't think the FDA has approved of the male spermicidal pill) in their prescription plan, and the subsequent people who don't know the difference between the government denying a right and a business denying a privilege (usually from femiNAZIs and the politically whipped); the fact is that if Romney were elected, he couldn't do anything about abortion, and the pro-abortion crowd would have more ammunition. Heck, even if the Big O had a change of heart, technically, a constitutional amendment (as opposed to just a new law) doesn't need to be signed by the president.
No, I don't feel good when I'm even forced to entertain the thought that, say, pro-abortionists have a point about raped women (although if certain statistics can be trusted, keeping that exception in an abortion ban would still be HUGE progress) but before we can even begin to campaign for a de-jure ban, we need to work toward a de-facto way of preventing abortions. The good news is that the percentage of women who have had abortions by age 40 has decreased through the decades. Let's keep it that way.
@Kathleen: All the more reason to condemn what they did to Terri Schiavo. Until a few years ago, people in a persistent vegetative state were thought to be totally gone. Now, neuroscience has discovered that many of these people are still there cognitively, at least in part. But I don't think you'll hear any apologizing. That would mean acknowledging the pro-lifers were right about something, as they were arguing this all along.
I saw this news item on BBC online under "Health". Pretty interesting:
"A Canadian man who was believed to have been in a vegetative state for more than a decade, has been able to tell scientists that he is not in any pain"
Wow - it's a good thing I'm secure in my Catholic Faith and didn't read these comments in the middle of a conversion to Catholicism. I can just feel the Charity dripping from each post. I see a number of familiar names here and can't believe we'd expect others to see peace in our heart. Perhaps all of us should spend some more time in prayer about these issues and how to communicate with each other. Then we can read Aquinas to understand how he argued charitably and respectfully represented his opponents' positions, usually better than they did themselves. Let's start looking like we been to the endzone before and perhaps others will start to listen and follow. God Bless.
"I've long said that the best way to teach pro-life, is to buy every 5th grade science teacher a $100 incubator."
That is so true: 100 years ago young people knew a lot more about biology, just from growing up near nature. Now they have no clue. This is why they are so easily brainwashed to view sex as a commodity, totally separated from procreation. That is where the answer lies, not is some pie in the sky constitutional amendment. Teach young people the truth. That is where Catholics should be.
if this map is correct- Personhood actually stands a much better chance is the LEAST populous areas.
Overwhelmingly, the least populous areas of the United States are agricultural and deeply committed to biology and the cycle of life. You can't make a living off of raising livestock and NOT know that an egg and a chicken are the same animal- regardless of appearances.
It is the MOST populous areas, the urban centers, that are a problem. Not the least populous. City folks don't know where those eggs come from and since the ones they buy in the store aren't fertilized, they've never seen one turn into a chicken.
I've long said that the best way to teach pro-life, is to buy every 5th grade science teacher a $100 incubator.
As Justice Scalia has noted, "It is very difficult to adopt a constitutional amendment" ("Scalia: Abortion, death penalty 'easy' cases," CBS News Online, Oct. 5, 2012). The aforementioned article also says that by Scalia's calculation, "[L]ess than 2 percent of the U.S. population, residing in the 13 least populous states, could stop an amendment…." If his calculations are correct, a personhood amendment wouldn't stand a chance. I'm not saying we shouldn't try, however. Just putting things into perspective.
Charity is a duty, not an option, for the truly faithful Catholic. I find the "forced charity isn't charity" to be a cop-out for those who want to take instead of make.
Which is my whole problem with Ayn Rand- she didn't know that the real takers in any free market aren't labor, they're the owners who seek rent, interest, and steal wages from labor.
Great article Mr. Zmirak, especially your point about charity that is coerced isn't charity. I'll share the link you mentioned about Pope Leo XIII's warnings about the evils of socialism.
Howard, may I suggest looking up the Universal Destination of Goods in the Catechism?
"Ryan, in contrast *did* advocate gravely and intrinsically evil *policy*."
Actually what Ryan did was to promote a position that would limit, though not completely outlaw, abortion. This is a position that is completely consistent with Catholic teaching.
Stating otherwise is in fact calumny.
Hi, Padre—you said "Thus, his position is all human creatures have a right to life, with no exceptions, ergo 100% pro-life."
Except the problem with this statement—which Shea also recognizes as shown by his above comment—is that Ron Paul seems okay with the use of abortifacient drugs post-rape. Which is why I don't think one can claim that, on a personal level, Paul is a "no exceptions" pro-life proponent. I grant that he's close to 100 percent, it seems, but not quite.
And this gets to the heart of what Zmirak has to say, I think. With the abortion issue, the calculus of presidential politics, particularly for faithful Catholics, has been such that front-running candidates tend not to be very genuine in zeal for the issue and so the benefit is largely one-way—in favor of the candidate rather than the pro-life voter (and ultimately rather than for the unborn). But even with other candidates—like Ron Paul—whose zeal for the life issues is evident, we have to be realistic and clear about both "personal" and "policy" characteristics and properly assess how they measure up to Catholic teaching. Ron Paul comes close, but at the end of the day, it's actually *Paul Ryan* who is "personally" more "pro-life" based on the public record as I'm aware of it. What if Paul Ryan had run for president and not VP? And what if it so happened that he ran against Ron Paul? I think the evidence shows that Ryan edges ahead of Paul in the "pro-life" question…
God bless,
Deacon JR
Deacon JR,
Paul Ryan's position that every baby has dignity, except in x, y, and z cases, is logical non-sense, and while Shea might be wrong to suggest that a pro-life voter can't prudently vote for Paul Ryan (or his flip flopper boss), he is absolutely correct that Ron Paul's professed position is the only rationally (rational=truth=of God) coherent position. Ron Paul is pro-life, even though he proposes no policies on the federal level (except the 10th amendment), because that divestment of power would over night empower the states to ban abortion, and more than half of them would. Ron Paul also is in favor of state bans just as he is in favor or state murder bans. Thus, his position is all human creatures have a right to life, with no exceptions, ergo 100% pro-life. How you accomplish the good, morally speaking, is not important (so long as you use moral means), it is the DESIRE to accomplish the good that makes an act moral. A portion of the time Paul Ryan suspends his desire to do good in accommodation of an emotional political position. "Thy will be done…"
Ted Seeber:
This is totally off-topic, and you're free to disregard it, but I come from Oregon and graduated in 1991 with a Bill Seeber (S.U.H.S.). I also worked at Mt. Angel Abbey (Benedictine) Seminary in the kitchen and, for a time, in their library between June of 1993 and December of 1995. I became Catholic in 1995. I guess I'm just wondering if you and Bill were related. He and the girl who became his wife were always pleasant company (thoughtful, kind and intelligent).
Just wondered.
Sarah L
Full disclosure: upon reviewing what Shea says above, I need to acknowledge that the standard he proposes is that Ron Paul's "policy" is not gravely intrinsically evil, and sending the abortion issue back to the states is not an intrinsically evil proposition. I grant that. But I think my point still stands—if one's "personal" stance is subordinate to one's "policy" stance and not "germane" to the final determination of who to vote for, then the Paul "policy" on abortion remains unclear. And in the case of an unclear "policy," one might think to look toward the views (and votes) previously expressed by a candidate to determine where he stands; otherwise you still end up with the potential example I mention above (e.g. a personally "racist" candidate whose policy is not racist).
Deacon JR
A seamless garment exists that fits both Cthulhu and Mark Shea.
No more "seamless garment" talk from bishops, please.
Dear Padre—
First, sorry for the delay in replying; some technical issues apparently kept me from doing so most of yesterday. But I wanted to respond to what you wrote and clarify my point a bit.
I am not so much engaging Ron Paul the candidate as I am engaging Mark Shea as a voter for the candidate, a voter claiming to have voted for particular reasons. So, when I say the Ron Paul candidacy "policy" of sending the abortion issue back to the states is "not exactly a pro-life view," I do not therefore mean that it's exactly a "pro-abortion view". It's really neither. Sending it back to the states doesn't equate to a "policy" that reflects on the morality of abortion one way or the other. As such, this means that Shea's claim that it's the Ron Paul "policy" he looks to as "germane" to the question of abortion rather than Paul's "confused" (Shea's word) view on what Paul would do in certain rape cases is a bit of a red herring. Unless Ron Paul elsewhere has a specific campaign "policy" that is in contradiction to the "personal" pro-abortion-in-some-rape-cases view Shea admits is held by the candidate. Minus evidence of an actual positively pro-life "policy" of the Ron Paul campaign, Shea's expressed logic obviously fails.
You also mention Ron Paul's solidly pro-life voting record. Which is true. But from Shea's perspective, this is not sufficient to the task of affirming that a candidate is "pro-life." Exhibit A—Shea's treatment of candidate Paul Ryan, who *also* has a consistent pro-life voting record. But for Shea, Ryan is not pro-life (despite the clear voting record) because he entered a campaign whose "policy" is not one-hundred percent pro-life. For consistency's sake, one must apply the same principle to Ron Paul and not look to the past voting record but only look at the campaign *policy*, if one follows Shea's logic.
And therefore, regarding your admonition "shame on you for chastising someone for voting for the only REAL prolife candidate: Ron Paul," I ask you to tell me: if the Ron Paul "campaign policy" is the *only* meaningful measure of the candidate's "real" pro-life status (which is precisely Shea's argument), then where in the campaign policy is this real pro-life status expressed?
So the summary here is that 1) Shea's reaction to Zmirak is considerably over-the-top. 2) Shea is detracting from fellow Catholic Paul Ryan's reputation as an ardently pro-life politician adhering fully to Church teaching. 3) Shea's own rationale for voting for Ron Paul appears un-reasonable after all, and not internally consistent with the standard by which he measured VP candidate Ryan.
Which brings me full circle to my first suggestion to Zmirak above—Shea's critique of this post and the previous one by Zmirak is probably not worth taking seriously.
God bless you,
Deacon JR
Mrs s - Ron Paul doesn't think the state should be the one to define marriage at all. Personally he follows the Christian definition - no one has asked him about divorce to my knowledge. Henry VIII redefined marriage, but married a woman each of 6 times. Why did St. Thomas More lose his head? Paul's view is neither Catholics nor Gays, nor the remarried, nor the contracepting should use the State to shove their definition down the throats of others. Not all grave evils are to be met with bombs and bullets. Paul voted FOR the Defense of Marriage act because the feds and some states were imposing foreign definitions on others. Meanwhile, while No Fault divorce laws stand, Catholic Marriage (a private contract making divorce nearly impossible and banning contraception) is illegal, i.e. "till death do us part" is specifically NOT legally recognized. Perhaps we should move to make Catholic marriage legal first.
Comboxes matter because they are words that mean things and they come from the hearts of real human beings. Which is why I'm seriiously disgusted by "The Jerk" (how self-deprecating of him!) to come here and call Dr. Zmirak a clown. Something's up with that and I can't figure out if it's jealousy or what, but whatever else it may be, it's unwelcome and terribly childish.
I love how the Ron Paul people are so quick to gloss over his gay marriage views.
Of course, mentioning it from the pulpit is rather dangerous under the censorship of the secularists:
@tz- like myself for a while, you forgot chattel slavery.
Maybe because it's the only one of the five that the two major parties together don't support.
Though yeah, I've heard the argument before that it should fall under cheating laborer of his wages.
But it sure would help if we'd hear about those other four from the pulpit once in a while.
Personally I'm tired of being rooked by the bishops on a knightly basis. Getting to the 8th rank might let the Queen of the holy rosary empower us - she is the mediatrix of all graces.
I thought there were only 4 sins that cried to heaven. One of which involves wages, which makes Labor (Subjects, not Objects in the Theology of the Body) different in kind from a commodity or rent or interest.
Ron Paul fears government power. Power corrupts, and he is the only one I know who actively fights it. He doesn't take lobbyists' money. He doesn't take perks. BECAUSE he fears power/corruption, he refuses to attempt to use it to try to create heaven-on-earth as it would instead be co-opted by Hell.
80% of the Federal government is corrupt, intrusive, destructive, etc. It is better to destroy 90% and backfill the 10% privately or through the church than to keep the 80% evil for the sake of the 20% good.
@Mark Shea- "If there is an utter lack of teaching, how come you and I know what the Church teaches?"
I don't know about you, Mark, but for me it took spending a lot of time in the library of a certain Benedictine Monastery.
I certainly have NEVER heard about the 5 Sins That Cry Out to Heaven for Vengeance from the pulpit.
I have only heard the word "contraception" from the pulpit ONCE in 40 years, and never the word "racism" or "abortion"
And while I am going to confession on Saturday, I am praying that Father doesn't try to tell me despair isn't a sin. Far too many priests have disregarded my sins, instead of offering absolution for them.
And if we're wondering why 98% of Catholics voted Democrat or Republican in this past election- THAT is exactly why.
@Adolfo—If you want to be taken seriously in talking about "what the Church teaches" you will have to provide references to the specific place and location of these teachings. Otherwise, it is just "what some guy calling himself Adolfo teaches in the comboxes". It would be much easier for you to establish that the Church teaches that certain things are not optional—including the virtue of charity, a fair wage for workers (which indeed does fall under justice), and alms for the poor.
I agree that the Neo-cons didn't know it was a mistake. But they should have. It was a willful ignorance.
First of all it is UNTRUE that being for Federalism, i.e. following the law (which we Catholics have a duty to do), and leaving issues like murder to the states is pro-death. There is no Federal murder law for a crime committed in the states, and no Bishop is claiming that we need to have one in order to be pro-life.
Secondly, in 2000 Ron Paul voted for the Partial birth abortion ban, and in 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011, he introduced the Sanctity of Life Act.
If there is one thing you can say about Paul is that he is consistent and I think you would be hard pressed to find him flip flopping on this issue. The question for Paul is HOW we ban abortion, not IF, and to say otherwise is dishonest. If you didn't know this, now you do, if you did, shame on you for chastising someone for voting for the only REAL prolife candidate: Ron Paul. The man who understands that its illogical to say I am against killing babies, except in x, y, and z cases, and who understands that the ONLY way we are going to make a dent in abortion is to abandon the easy (and now unattainable way), that may very well be unconstitutional to boot, and to work community by community and state by state, which is actually the way it was before Roe.
In Christ,
I completely and whole-heartedly disagree with the notion that we "knew" it was a mistake to invade and "occupy" Iraq.
It was not then, and it is not now.
Dear Deacon JR, who gives a rodent's posterior about Mark's or John's comboxes?
Sorry for another comment, but I need to register my astonishment at finding out that Shea is accusing Zmirak of "calumny" over in Mark's blog comboxes.
Totally unsavory, particularly given Shea's own treatment of fellow Catholic Paul Ryan's reputation….seriously, is this the level of holiness and civility that draws us closer to Christ???
Let's do better than this,
Deacon JR
Mark—I also want to point out that I'm not arguing this from a merely political perspective, which would require more of a direct comparison between Ron Paul and Romney, rather than looking at the moral landscape associated with a Ron Paul and a Paul Ryan. Instead, I'm questioning your application of reason and Church teaching relative to the moral question of endorsing or not endorsing a particular candidate on the basis of that person's acceptance of grave intrinsic evil.
As I see it, you seem to be using an "inversion" of the now-classic "personally opposed but don't want to impose my views" political calculus to justify a vote for Ron Paul despite his personally held pro-abortion view. That's what makes it interesting to me—that a personal belief in just a little grave intrinsic evil doesn't seem to bother you as long as the candidate doesn't directly enshrine that personal belief in "policy."
And yet, other examples of applying this reasoning seem less savory. For example, let's assume Candidate A is personally a racist but knows the public won't accept any direct "policy" to promote his racist views. So his "policy" is squeaky clean but his personal belief is in a grave intrinsic evil—is it morally good to vote for this person, or does the fact of his personally racist belief disqualify him from consideration?
Deacon JR
Yeah, "a constitutional amendment", sure, an other pie in the sky excuse to do nothing. There is plenty that can be done at the local level, starting with adoption. Adoptions are down. Why should Catholic adoption be closed because government funding is running out, for whatever reason? That makes no sense. I though the whole idea was to get government out of these things, anyways. Saving one life at the time, not by government fiat/machinations, I thought that was the whole idea. Remember? "Subsidiarity"? Once this takes momentum, amendments, etc.. will follow. But this means real work, not sitting on ones a$$ behind a computer, bloging rants.
Okay, Mark, I'm trying to get the logic of what you say above.
I will quibble over whether Ryan "advocated" (he didn't—he "articulated") the Romney campaign abortion "policy," but in any case your view is that the originally fully pro-life Ryan was "not pro-life" during the campaign because he "advocated" a gravely intrinsically evil abortion "policy".
But Ron Paul, who was *not* fully pro-life prior to the campaign (he personally advocates the grave intrinsic evil of abortion in some rape cases), actually *was* fully pro-life during the campaign because his abortion "policy" did not advocate grave intrinsic evil. But wait, isn't Ron Paul's "policy" simply to give the abortion issue back to the states? Not exactly a "pro-life" view, I'd say.
In the end, both men were "inconsistent" according to you view, weren't they?
And, now that the campaign is over, the guy you voted for remains "not pro-life" while Ryan, whom you said also was *not* pro-life actually is *back* to being pro-life?
This whole "policy above personal view" gets verrry confusing once the campaign is over and the "policies" disappear…I mean, now, after the campaign, people who endorsed Ryan as a good VP candidate get to say they endorsed a guy who is in full accord with Church teaching on abortion, while you're stuck with saying the guy you voted for is pro-abortion in certain cases….
I find that odd.
Deacon JR
An amendment is indeed the only way forward now on the pro-life front, and that was always really the endgame. What's changed there is that with Roe now irrevocably in place, there's no chance of incremental bans along the way—it will all have to come down at once, which will as a practical matter make the amendment that much harder to pass when the time comes.
But understand that that is not something that will happen anytime soon. From the founding of Birth Control Review to Roe, it took Margaret Sanger little under 60 years—three generations—to achieve her vision, and that was in a culture already looking to buy what she was selling. It's going to take at least twice that long to reverse the damage wrought (assuming this culture lasts that long) and we're not likely to live to see the end result.
But that's the way these things normally work. One plows, another sows, a third reaps, and God is the only one there the whole way through. (Us? I think we're still clearing the rocks off of the field.)
A pro-life amendment could not even carry Mississippi and would not ever pass. And with only 20% of the people supporting a complete ban on abortion (Gallup), even the Supreme Court—no matter who appoints the judges—won't touch it. The Church has put the political cart before the evangelical horse; we have to convert the nation before we can carry an election, not after. And in getting the proper order wrong, they cut abortion completely out of its doctrinal contexts, away from contraception on one side and the whole area of social justice on the other. In return, the Church got neither good politics nor effective evangelism. What really happened Tuesday? The re-election of the President was the least of it; the more important event was the complete collapse of the Church's political agenda. Four states did what no state has ever done before: vote for homosexual "marriage."
Yes, a majority considers itself "pro-life," but that is only because the term has been dumbed-down to include all sorts of exceptions. In truth, 20% support abortion under all circumstances and 20% oppose it under any circumstances, and everybody else is in the middle. And those are the same numbers as in 1975. Nothing's changed. This is because the Bishops understand neither politics nor evangelization. They sold their flocks to the Republican Party and got nothing in return. And now, there is no "Catholic Vote" for them to deliver to the lowest bidder; they have lost all credibility. We'll have to do the job ourselves.
A constitutional amendment does not need to be carried out through a convention. It can be initiated by Congress, and most importantly it requires a lot of groundwork in the states. Everyone agrees that a Federal Personhood Amendment or a Human Life Amendment is what is needed. Jason Jones is not saying that this will be a cakewalk, he states that "we needed to do the long, slow, thankless work needed to push such an amendment through the Congress and the states. It is time we finally get started on that work."
No one can seriously say that the low hanging fruit strategy pursued for the last 40 years of fetal pain, ultrasounds, parental consent, partial birth abortion, have made America more pro-life. The only "advance" in our battle has come at the expense of what it even means to be pro-life. Remember a majority of Americans polled say they are pro-life, and a majority of Americans picked, Barack "Infanticide" Obama.
The slow thankless work means that we start grass roots efforts in all 50 states that can trickle up to our elected representative. It means pro-life state houses pass resolutions calling for a Human Life Amendment. It means fighting to win the war and abolish abortion, not fighting to win an insignificant battle, like parental consent (which must have a judicial bypass) or partial birth abortion bans, that can't actually ban the killing of the child, just that particular narrowly defined procedure.
I for one am ready to start working towards the constitutional amendment, even if it takes my entire lifetime. I know my children will keep the fight going if they need to.
A 12 year old understands the absurdity of this, until he/she is brainwashed by the "no strings attached adult reproductive rights" industry. Sorry.
The point is that over 99% of abortions are done as back up "birth control". Let's convince people to "chose" adoption instead. Let's learn from the abolition movement 150 years ago, that purchased slaves to free them. For example, why not pay abortion providers to refer expecting mothers to adoptions agencies instead? Let's use market forces for good. That is the place to start, not some off the wall constitutional assembly that is never going to happen. Heck, at 12 weeks gestation, humans in utero and kittens are the same size, and sort of look the same. That is when kittens are born. Humans, as larger mammals, need to stay in the womb longer. Yet it is illegal to kill kittens in all 50 states, but not humans at same gestational age. Kittens have more rights than humans! A 12 year understands the absurdity of this, until he/she is brainwashed by the "no strings attached adult reproductive rights" industry.
Ryan, in contrast *did* advocate gravely and intrinsically evil *policy*. There's your difference.
Deacon JR:
No. Paul advocated no grave intrinsic evil *as policy*. That's what matters here. His confused views on what he would do in a rape situation are not germane. If he were advocating gravely and intrinsically evil *policy* I would never have voted for him.
So he voted for inconsistency before he voted against it? Stop it. Y'all are giving me a headache.
Based on reading this article and the one Shea linked, the charge of inconsistency seems to be based in the fact that Zmirak is now saying that pro-lifers should refuse to be pawns of GOP lies, when he previously was calling pro-lifers who DID refuse to be pawns for GOP liars masturbators.
From a certian point of view, I guess it might not be inconsistent to say that "Pro-Lifers Must Stop Being Pawns until it's time to be Pawns again (when the next "MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION EVER!" comes back up….)
Dear Mr. Zmirak—
I probably don't have to encourage this, but I'd suggest not paying much attention to Mark Shea's unstudied assessment of your posts and his claim of your inconsistency.
Shea's lack of clarity on issues such as these is manifest. I particularly noted his erroneous recent statement, for example, that Paul Ryan is "not pro-life" (when of course he is). The ironic part of that accusation, as I see it, is that it stems from Ryan having to articulate the abortion stance of the Romney campaign, which, of course, no longer exists. Shea's logic would seem to have this mean that Ryan was ardently pro-life before the campaign, "not pro-life" during the campaign, and I guess presumably pro-life again now that the campaign is over….
Further, what of Shea's publicly admitting that he voted for Ron Paul, who, of course, supports grave intrinsic evil? I thought any support of grave intrinsic evil was a deal-breaker when it came to Shea's vote.
I will say that you and Mark both have my prayers, particularly in hopes that we all can engage each other respectfully in matters that touch on Catholic teaching and truth.
Deacon JR
Hayek or Keynes is one thing. Abortion is another.
Its time to dissociate these. Promoting free market, more or less government is no going to make people more moral.
There are also plenty free market forces behind abortion.
Sheldon Adelson, as major backer of Romney, is adamantly pro abortion.
As Catholics, we need not despair, but double up and convert people's hearts, instead of linking abortion to partisan causes, with wako politicians making ridiculous statements a la Akin or Mourdock.
I don't understand the charges of inconsistency. Sure, Dr. Zmirak has changed his tune: the political situation that inspired the first article no longer holds. So too may a bugler change his call from "Charge" to "Rally" when the corps needs to regroup. The argument of the first article can be summarized as "Swing state voters must vote Romney, because if Obama wins, prolife votes for president will no longer matter;" the second, "Obama has won, so prolife votes for president no longer matter. We need to change tactics." You can disagree with the arguments if you like, but you can't reasonably charge him with inconsistency.
I think that many Catholics like Zmirak fail to grasp the lesson they should have learned from this election. Although you may strongly believe in banning abortion even for rape victims, denying homosexuals rights while asserting that zygotes deserve them, and that contraception is evil, you are in the vast minority, so there's no votes to be gained by demonizing any who disagree and shrieking that they are evil. Romney valiantly tried to create some space between himself and the Christianist base of the Republican Party, but even this diluted version was too extreme for most Americans. To believe that a "personhood amendment" as a back door to overturning Roe v. Wade would have any chance of success demonstrates an unwillingness to face facts and remain in a cocoon isolated from reality.
It wasn't "their irresponsible policies" on occupying Iraq, or deregulating financial institutions that cost them this election; these things cost them the 2008 election. It was the one-note religious zealots, the Christian politicians trotting out absurd theories to explain why even abortion in cases of rape should be banned, the shrieking cries of socialism despite the lowest taxes in over 50 years, the preposterous climate-change deniers, and the birthers and other assorted racists and loons that make up the new Republican Party. But the NCRegister and every blogger on staff was firmly on their side. Good thing for the country that most Catholics aren't.
Please forgive a small-small minded lay person for entering the fray with such well written theological giants.
There are places in the world in far greater economic despair than the US. It would seem that much of the problem faced is our inability to win the hearts and minds of anyone. Life, Liberty and Pursuit of happiness… really that's dignity, freedom, and pursuit of what's good. Happiness can not be had with out liberty, liberty can not be had with out life.
Granted Romney might not have made strong moves against Roe, and largely it might not have been possible for him to do so. But he at least was in support of defending marriage and our religious freedom. Our culture views marriage as a legal contract even if done in a sacramental way. Not knowing what Catholic life is like in other countries, I can barely comprehend how US Catholics account for 60% of the annulments granted worldwide, but only 6% of the worldwide Catholic population. I can totally grasp how I fall into that statistical category, as through that process I made effort to education myself on what the Church teaches that marriage really is. I had never learned any of these things growing up. Marriage is the societal unit, and yet we cannot win the hearts of the people in even this. It must get worse before it gets better I suppose.
I simply couldn't bring myself to vote for Obama after hearing his 2008 campaign speech about not wanting his daughters to be punished with a baby. If one of my own daughters became pregnant out of wedlock or too young, I pray for the grace to be joyful, but I can't fathom the idea of considering my grandchild to be a punishment.
A constitutional amendment is implausible simply because if 2/3 of this nation believed that infants had rights then it is easy enough for the constitution to be read with this presumption. The fact is we have lost, we, Christians, have lost the reigns of culture and it is going to be a long slow road to get it back. God forbid we call a constitutional convention, can you imagine what the constitution would look like after this society was done with it. You want to stop being made pawns, beat the devil at his own game. People love "FREEDOM," why not use that against the devil. As a Catholic Priest I have been told its "un-christian" to support libertarians, and the fact is that the Libertarian ideology does have problems and comes into conflict with the Faith, but as we have so often before in history why can't we used what is true of Libertarianism and appropriate it for ourselves? I'm not talking ideology though, but prudential ordering of society, I am talking subsidiarity to use a Catholic word. Why make it an issue of "imposing our views" (that's how they see it) on others, most democrats will never see eye to eye with SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES, the big bad Christian right, but they might see eye to eye with libertarianism, which is at the root of the voting paterns of many democrats. I can't believe, with what history has shown us, that many people actually dig authoritarian collectivism. Its so anti-American, anti-Pop culture. Returning so many issues to state and local levels under the pretext of FREEDOM allows Christian areas to ban abortion, not just politically conservative but also those who see the problems with the pro-death position but are unwilling to compromise the social welfare system. More importantly, these issues being decided on the local level, will foster debate, thought, and give Christians the chance to re-evangelize. Think about it, pushing the freedom agenda, the states rights agenda, we could be in the trenches working with all those people who the Democratic Party think they have a lock on, druggies, anti-war activists, moral relativists, atheists—while you might find this distasteful imagine the possibilities for dialog, for the new evangelization. Libertarians are anti-government, in an age where government imposes itself more and more on Christians how can we fail to be anti-government? We are fighting on the wrong battle field, and as long as we try to win this fight by backing yesterday's winner we are doomed to fail.
If there is an utter lack of teaching, how come you and I know what the Church teaches? What is required now is a level head and the eyes to see what a golden opportunity we have to regroup, learn, and teach, the faith. All that is really happening here is that an idol that needed smashing was smash. I am more hopeful now than I've been in ages.
Good idea Mark- but you are missing the totality of my sin.
I would have said the same even if Roney had won. This is not about Romney or Obama, it is about the utter lack of teaching from the Church. And that is MY fault as much as anybody's. To whom much is given, much is required.
Given the two articles, it would appear that John Z Has contracted a bad case of Romnesia. There ought to be a telethon for that disease.
"Evil has won" is the sin of despair. Stop it. Get off line, stop feeding on despair, and get reacquainted with your faith. Jesus remains God. The Church has been through war, persecution and genocide. Romney losing an election is small beer.
The GOP is already planning to ditch the "values voters" so it can regain "the precious" (power that is.)
It would not have been ineffective if people like John Z hadn't been giving economic conservatives a pass on intrinsic evil for 40 years now. And if we actually had a generation of Catholics who knew the difference between the 5 sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance and a bribe.
No, those who have compromised the Faith for worship of the rich and for the holy orgasm of free to fail sex are the ones who gave us such utterly evil candidates. A vote for evil, just brings more evil- lesser or greater, greed or lust, it is still a vote for evil.
I give up. Evil has won. Hope you enjoy your $3 in dimes.
"Dr. Zmirak isn't reversing himself or being inconsistent."
Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
Dr. Zmirak isn't reversing himself or being inconsistent. Admitting that Romney was a flawed candidate, he counseled supporting him as a lesser evil, and exposed the illogic of those who falsely asserted that it might be sinful to support Romney for that reason. He calculated, rightly, that the defeat of Romney would make the Supreme Court impossible to reform—while a Romney victory might make it possible (if uncertain). He urged prolifers to rally behind the least bad option, and resist a far greater evil, in the hope of leaving open this avenue of attack on abortion. Now that it has closed, he is honestly stating why Romney lost, and calculating the (now much steeper) odds of changing our abortion laws by a much more arduous method. Dr. Zmirak is not trying to blame Romney's loss on "purists" like Richert and Shea—whose influence as writers is, thankfully, negligible. Instead, Zmirak is forthrightly repeating criticisms of Romney like those he published at Crisis magazine when he was the editor, and criticisms of Republican foreign policy such as he has been writing, consistently, for years. The fact remains that Obama's victory is a disaster for the Church, while a Romney victory would have been a mild reprieve. Catholic institutions will now be closed by this intolerant administration, and Obama appointees will legislate from the bench in a manner much more hostile to the Church. Those who counseled futile, symbolic votes instead of effective votes against Obama have nothing to be proud of
Florida Amendment 6, which would have restricted abortion in Florida, FAILED at the ballot box 55-45
The people of Florida had a direct vote on abortion. They chose to support it. Until this changes, talking about whether a candidate is or is not taking advantage of pro-lifers is irrelevant.
Until these numbers are reversed, debating political strategy is irrelevant.
More sacrificing pro-life at the altar of the free market I see. That is exactly what caused 98% of American Catholics to vote for Intrinsic Evil in this election. It is time to abandon Lust and Greed, Murder and Gluttony, and replace them with Caritas In Vertitate.
If it isn't too late already, that is. 98% of your fellow Catholics fell for the lies of Hudge and Grudge. 98%. 50% of those for Obama, 48% for Romney.
IF we get another chance. I fear that we're far too late given how certain measures went elsewhere.
Oh, and subsidiarity? That's been illegal in the United States since 1796. Article I section 8 makes sure you can't protect your neighbors from economic invaders, and you can't protect the unborn from those who would impoverish their mothers and send them to the Planned Parenthood Death Factories.
The usual method of proposing Constitutional amendments is through approval by two-thirds of each house of Congress. With the current make-up of the House and Senate, this is not going to happen. But perhaps it is time to try the other, never-used method of proposing amendments—a constitutional convention. Article V of the Constitution states that Congress shall call a convention on the application of two-thirds of the states' legislatures—this means 34 states. I'd guess about 24 states (the solid "red" ones) would be willing to propose such an amendment—getting the other 10 would be tough. That's why I think it might be easier to propose an amendment that simply overturns Roe v. Wade—one that gives the states the sole power to allow, abolish, or regulate abortion as they please. Not the best solution, but it would at least allow "red" states to ban abortion. Of course, no matter what amendment is proposed or what method is used to propose it, it would then need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states, or 38—another uphill battle.
Jay Z here is right. Prolifers have to stop getting taken like rubes at a carnival. We can start by ignoring unserious clowns like Dr. Zmirak.
@ cowalker
The Personhood Amendment did not pass in Mississippi because pro-life "leaders" yes the same ones that wanted to push Romney on us came out publicly against the measure.
Haley Barbour, the fat cat Republican who coined the Big Tent Republican label, went on Fox and MSNBC to slam the personhood amendment days before the vote. The Catholic Bishops in Mississippi issued a statement practically urging folks to vote against it, so please don't blame personhood.
Jason Jones is 100% correct in saying that we need a federal constitutional amendment, and he is also correct that it is going to be a long effort, but we are supposed to be people of faith, are we not? We are supposed to believe in truth, are we not? Let's stop being pawns of those who don't even share our beliefs and let's start working towards what we all believe, that the preborn child is a person made in the image of God.
I'm in, who's with me?
Taking care of the poor and those without basic needs isn't charity, it's justice. At least, that's what the Church teaches. We can argue over how to redistribute the goods of the earth as a matter of prudence but not that they must be redistributed in order that those who lack may now have.
RE: "Q: What does Romney's loss mean for the life issue?"
The >>current<< composition of the U.S. Supreme Court =
Nine Supreme Court Justices: Six are Catholic/three are Jewish.
I agree with Mark Shea's comments regarding pro-lifers being used as pawns. The setup of the current court should have produced some movement in the pro-life effort. I do not believe the GOP has any real desire to affect this change. They will lose supporters and votes.
Some of us made the very argument in November 2008 that Jason Jones did in November 2012. And one of us even made that argument in September 2007, in a piece commissioned by the author of this post, who, in October 2012, disavowed the piece he had commissioned, but now, three weeks later, has once again embraced its substance.
Being consistent is, paradoxically, both somewhat easier and somewhat harder than being inconsistent. Still, I recommend giving it a try.
You know, I couldn't agree more. Prolifers must stop being pawns. That's why some of us refused to vote for a cynical duplicitous liar who said that abortion was just ducky for the "health of the mother", who repeatedly sent out surrogated making extremely clear that he would do nothing about Roe, and whose policies were pretty much the tissue of falsehood and delusion you describe above. But when we did, some said that we were narcissistic onanists and needed to get in line and wink at these various fibs for the Team. I'm glad to see we finally agree.
"Now it's clear we won't have votes to overturn Roe. So we must focus on the sole means left for protecting unborn Americans: a constitutional amendment defining them as persons." Jason Jones
A state personhood constitutional amendment couldn't get passed in Mississippi last year. Mississippi has very strong legal restrictions on abortion. If personhood couldn't make it in Mississippi, it's not going to pass at a national level.
Love this. Promoting now.
Mr. Zrimak neglected to attack the elephant in the room, that being the USCCB and its programs such as CCHD. They confuse the importance of the life issues, marriage and religious freedom with the programs of CCHD and its pursuit of social programs that destroy the healthy situation of subsidiarity in the preferential treatment towards the poor. They divide and conquer the Catholic vote for Obama because the community organizing aims directly at communities such as the hispanic and latino voters. We are divided because the USCCB is.


text:
August, 2011: The secret project «Improvisation for...» finished!
The secret project «Improvisation for...» has finished.
When I decided the last year to add a link for receiving money donations in this website and Jamendo, I decided too to make a "secret" project with it, for an undefined time. The idea was that when somebody made a donation, I recorded -as gratitude- an improvisation for this person -playing piano, electric piano, organ or some keyboard instrument- and sent by e-mail. So, since June of 2010, when I received the first donation, I have been from time to time recording these special secret pieces. Recorded, mixed and mastered, I've tried to send in mp3 format everyone of tese tracks to the corresponding donors (unfortunately I haven't been able to contact with all of them). After 13 improvisations, this month, August of 2011, I've decided to finish with the project. Since today receiving a money donation won't be possible in this website or Jamendo :-) The chance is finished! :-)
Is going to be this music (or part of it) released in this website, some future album, compilation or something else??? Not by my side. Everyone of these recordings has been made for a particular person, as a gift, and from the beginning I had added the important rule of "not to be officially released", I mean, not from my side. 13 improvisations, 13 owners. Everyone of them is free to decide what to do. They can share of course by Internet using eMule or soulseek, if they want for example, or just to keep the track at home, or even deleting it. Everything is possible!
I've decided too other thing: there are actually three improvisations which I haven't able to hand over; I'm going to wait for a time, but if the authentical donators don't contact to take them, I'll finally share them here, but just for a little time, just for a few of weeks, no more. Later they will be deleted on the website. I'll wait a few of months more...
As curiosity, the piece «About Memories and Deceptions» was composed and recorded from the previous (from this series) «Improvisation for Thorsten Bothe», one of my favourites.
You have more additional information about this project in my «Works» files.
I see you in NY :-(),
José Travieso
Now playing - Milenio3 :-)

subset: commoncrawl


text:
You can save money if you learn steps to make energy. See, I managed to save some money every month and also do my part for the surroundings thanks to a solar photovoltaic panel that I built not long ago.
Preserving your solar energy system, including checking the inverter regularly, is a crucial component of acquiring the best from it. If you see strong green lights, you have nothing to consider. You need to talk with an authority who can advise you – like this firm. It's nearly impossible for panel proprietors to identify issues. You shouldn't have to pay for somebody to look at it if you own a warranty in the panels.
There's a lot of talk in the main stream media about falling and conservation of one's carbon footprint. In if you visit the links below you'll see exactly what I mean. Chances are, you're doing things that are beneficial for earth. You have invested in a hybrid-car or even plant trees could recycle bottles or cans. Solar power in your home is shown by far the finest resource and saving in this area will be a giant financial steps forward.
It is correct that solar panels for dwellings used to be really big and the properties patronizing these were easily noticeable. Following changes have decreased their size to a great extent, however they are cumbersome. For generating your personal electricity at very affordable cost with minimal effort, still, they make a proposal that is feasible. Should you find it convenient, to get the needful done you may build your panels or hire the employment of a business. One business that decided to go solar was Essendon FC centre where they built a solar energy powered training ground.
Should you like to go camping, than this is the tent for you personally. A tent with solar light. It comes in six or four -guy six and is made from PVC and nylon. The solar-panel can be found on top of the tent and costs throughout the day by way of a panel that was clear. The panel can be used to charge batteries independently, or it will give 2 to four hrs of tent lighting for every four to six hours that it is charged. The interior lighting is energy friendly.
You are going to have never-ending energy, and at no cost. It'll have paid for itself over a short time. This can be an effective strategy to get yourself of the grid. I would recommend it and also have personally were able to construct my own home DIY electricity system merely carrying out a Do-It-Yourself manual on the web.


text:
The Walking Dead, Breaking Bad And More Pop Culture Coloring Books For Adults [PHOTOS]
by www.ibtimes.com
Coloring books are no longer just for kids, as adult coloring books are now starting to become a mainstream activity. Coloring isnt just an activity to do for fun either. Research shows that it can be used as a form of therapy.
Read Full Article On www.ibtimes.com
Read Full Article On www.ibtimes.com


text:
This products ships to USA only.
Trans Globe Lighting
Portable 12\" Under-Cabinet Fixture
Free Shipping
Final Sale - No Returns or Exchanges
- Trans Globe Lighting
- Free Ground Shipping (UPS / FedEx / Curbside)
- 12"w x 3.5"d x 1"h
- Number of Bulbs: 68
- Type of Bulb: LED - Built-in
- Max Wattage: 4
- Bulbs Included: Yes
- Suitable For: Indoor Use
- Energy Saving Feature: Yes
- Optional hardwired installation
- Imported
- Metal, Glass
- Style # 347206401
Easy to install for any use. Can be set up to plug and move as a portable around work areas or hardwire in to cabinet and ceiling areas. Low voltage LED lights provide energy savings with bright light output.
Ships from and sold by a Bluefly Marketplace Partner.
Availability: Usually Ships in 5 Business days


text:
Free shipping To
If you think the price is too high, please click to apply for lower price
The meter adopts a 0.56 -inch digital tube display, with buckle. Convenient to install. This meter can measure 50Hz / 60Hz, 70V -- -- -- -- -- 50Hz / 60 hz, 380 v ac voltage (average).Streamline design, the meter adopts the resistance capacity step-down power supply. Connect directly on the zero line and the line of fire, no additional power supply. The touch design, when the power supply is not stable/or poor contact, header will not burn. Long service life design. LED working current control within 20 ma, greatly extended the life of the LED. Global measuring ac voltage range, the most widely used after rectifying step-down way first, and avoid the instability of rectifier diode error brought about by the pressure drop. Defect is rising costs (increase CBB filtering capacitor. Parameters: working voltage is DC 70V-------DC 380V. Accuracy/error -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - 3%. Display color -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- red. Installation hole -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45.5 mm x 25.5 mm. Speed: 200 ms/or times. 0.6 "three digital tube. Scope of application: AC, 220V mains voltage test. The voltage is 220V generator monitoring. Inverter output of electricity monitoring. Other AC circuit voltage test
|1 piece
|Form Color
|Plastic + electronic components
|English Manual / Spec
|Other Features
|Dimensions & Weight
|1.89 in x 1.26 in x 1.14 in (4.8 cm x 3.2 cm x 2.9 cm)
|0.81 oz (23 g)
|Packing List
|1 x AC voltmeter (20cm)
All packages from DX.com are sent without DX logo or any information indicating DX.com. Due to package variations from suppliers, the product packaging customers receive may be different from the images displayed.
To enable volume discounts on this site, use coupon code: BULKRATE during checkout. You will see a discount applied at the bottom of the shopping cart. Competitive pricing is available. Contact us for details.
|3+ units
|5+ units
|10+ units
|US$5.79 shipped
|US$5.77 shipped
|US$5.75 shipped
What is Bulk Rate? BulkRate is a semi-wholesale system with items priced separately from retail. When you use bulk rates, a flat $1.70 registered air mail fee will automatically be added to your cart to ensure delivery of package. While BulkRate's intention is to offer cheaper prices when you buy in bulk, because it is priced separately it on occassions show a higher than retail price. That's why we ask you to enter BULKRATE as a coupon code to manually activate the rates. You can always opt not to use the bulk rates. If you are looking for wholesale prices please feel free to contact us.
Looking to get even more?
Share your reviews, photos and videos here!Review Program
Please note that DealExtreme Forums are not a sales or product support board. For support questions, please contact us via support ticket at http://cs.dx.com/ for a guaranteed response. We make every effort to make the quickest replies.


text:
Selected Expertise
- Causation analysis
- Damages estimation
- Data analysis
- Database development, management, and analysis
- False Claims Act
- Healthcare economics
- Off-label marketing
- Pharmaceutical economics
- Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement
- Reimbursement and claims data
Selected Industries
- Biotechnology
- Computer hardware and software
- Gaming
- Health insurance
- Healthcare
- Medical devices
- Medicare and Medicaid
- Pharmaceuticals
Benjamin Scher
- Partner
- Washington, DC
- 202.216.1806
- email@example.com
- Vcard
Ben Scher is an expert in providing data-driven insights to help solve complex problems. He has extensive experience performing empirical analyses of large data sets, conducting economic analysis and research, and serving as lead consulting expert in government investigations and through all phases of litigation. Mr. Scher's work has focused extensively on the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Recently, he has served as lead consulting expert for drug manufacturers, medical device manufacturers, and healthcare providers on numerous engagements—both litigation and government investigations—primarily involving alleged False Claims Act (FCA) violations. He also serves as a testifying expert for a large healthcare provider in a matter involving allegations of FCA violations. Many of the matters Mr. Scher has worked on involve hundreds of millions of dollars or more in controversy. Mr. Scher's work in these matters involves providing insights on liability, causation, and damages based on empirical analysis of data. In addition, many of these matters have involved issues relating to the methods used to select, and extrapolate from, statistical samples. Finally, Mr. Scher has significant experience in other industries and matters, most notably a variety of antitrust disputes.
Selected Experience
- Serving as lead consulting expert for a medical device manufacturer facing a government investigation regarding allegations of FCA violations for several products. Providing consulting expertise on liability, causation, and damages. Utilizing several large data sets pertaining to the products at issue and their clinical usage to perform statistical and empirical analyses of the allegations. Presented analyses to counsel for DOJ and OIG on several occasions.
- Serving as lead consulting expert for a medical device manufacturer facing a government investigation regarding allegations of alleged kickbacks and medically unnecessary services. Analyzing several large data sets relating to the sales and pricing of certain products and the frequency of certain services.
- Served as lead consulting expert for a major drug manufacturer throughout a multiyear government investigation spanning several products and qui tam allegations. Provided consulting expertise on liability, causation, and damages. Allegations included off-label promotion, violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, and violations of federal and state FCA laws. Analyzed hundreds of millions of claim records submitted to Medicare and state Medicaid programs. Also analyzed the manufacturer's pricing patterns and medical providers' prescription and drug administration patterns. Worked closely with counsel for several years throughout various phases of government investigations and litigation. Participated in settlement discussions with the government.
- In United States ex rel. George v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., serving as testifying expert for a nationwide healthcare provider facing allegations relating to alleged FCA violations.
- Serving as lead consulting expert for a major nationwide healthcare provider facing allegations of FCA violations stemming from the frequency with which certain services were provided. Analyzing several large databases to evaluate potential liability, causation, and damages. Evaluating methods used by Relator's expert to select a sample of medical records and determining appropriateness and statistical validity of the approach.
- Providing data analytics, cost-benefit analyses, and meta-analysis of healthcare literature on behalf of a medical device manufacturer in support of its interactions with FDA regarding a potential expansion of the approved indications for a product.
Served as lead manager supporting expert analyses of Dr. B. Douglas Bernheim on behalf of Amgen in Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. The court was considering whether to grant a permanent injunction barring F. Hoffman-La Roche from selling and marketing a product that infringed Amgen's patents. Analyses and testimony focused on the implications of recently introduced Medicare reimbursement policies on competitive dynamics among drug manufacturers and the impact of the potential entry of F. Hoffman-La Roche's product on Amgen, healthcare providers, Medicare, and third-party payors. Evaluated discovery documents and data and provided advice to counsel throughout expert and fact witness depositions and the permanent injunction hearing. The court granted a permanent injunction in Amgen's favor, barring F. Hoffman La-Roche from entering the US market with its competing drug.
Supported expert testimony of Dr. Randal Heeb in United States v. Dicristina regarding econometric and game theoretical evidence. The case centered on the question of whether poker is a form of gambling, and therefore illegal under the Illegal Gambling Business Act (IGBA). Based on analyses conducted using a data set of more than 415 million hands of online No Limit Hold'em poker, Bates White demonstrated that poker is, in fact, predominantly a game of skill, not chance. Judge Jack B. Weinstein ultimately ruled that poker is "predominated by skill" and therefore does not fit the definition of gambling under the IGBA.
Worked on behalf of AMD in the landmark microprocessor antitrust case AMD v. Intel. Led a team supporting Dr. B. Douglas Bernheim to review documents and depositions pertinent to understanding Intel's and AMD's relationships with their customers. Before the case was brought to trial, AMD and Intel agreed to a $1.25 billion settlement that included restrictions on certain business practices of Intel.
BS, Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University
- January 4, 2016
- International Journal of the Economics of Business, June 2015
- July 2014
- April 2013


text:
Each month, Rated People connects over 50,000 homeowners with quality tradesmen - simply enter your job details in the form above to get started.
We'll match your job to the relevant tradesmen in your area - those interested will pay to see your contact details and call you to quote.
As each tradesman expresses interest in quoting on your job, we'll send you their profile and ratings to help you choose the right one for you.
After the work is complete, return to the site and rate your tradesman based on their quality of work, reliability and value for money.
Added 24/05/2017
1. We have a leaky toilet where the water pipe connects to tank. 2. Our hot water cylinder...
Searching for tradespeople
Added 29/08/2016
I need to replace a broken tap in our utility room and replace our tap in Kitchen with a filter...
Searching for tradespeople
Added 28/01/2016
Repair toilet We have a Roca toilet and water is leaking from the bottom of the cistern....
Searching for tradespeople
Loft Conversion Specialist
Added 18/03/2014
Type of conversion: Rooflight conversion Room(s) to be in the conversion: 1 x bedroom, 1...
Searching for tradespeople
Added 21/03/2012
I need to: a add about 10 sockets into an existing domestic ring b run power to an outbuilding,...
Gardener / Garden Designer
Added 28/02/2012
I need to create a brick base to carry a timber workshop/shed measuring approx 10'x6'. As...
Managing your job is easier with the Rated People Homes App, download it today.


text:
|By Ruen
|More from Ruen
|Romance, Drama, Action
|No update page
|Chapter information
|Written by
|Release date
October 14, 2012
|Last chapter
None (or A:TLA)
|Next chapter
The first chapter, entitled Torn, in the-mini series Passion by Ruen.
Passion is the source of our finest moments; the joy of love, the clarity of hatred, and the ecstasy of grief. It hurts sometimes more than we can bear.
Aang held Katara close as he watched the night sky pass them by.
The moon above providing a tranquil, peaceful setting for the two. Katara's low, steady breathing on his chest as she slept. She felt as light as a feather.
His hand slowly lifted up to stroke her hair, careful not to wake his one, true treasure. He saw a star shooting across the sky above as he closed his eyes.
This was paradise.
A scream shattered the illusion and Aang awoke with the sound of his name, permeating the otherwise silent night. His blood curdled as he leapt out of bed, knowing right away the source.
Aang ran to his door as fast as he could, using his airbending to slam it open before rushing outside. His house was right next to Katara's and he could see right away, the door lay fallen on the ground. Aang's mind spiralled with one thought after another, each worse than the last.
Aang quickly made his way to the entrance of Katara's house, not wanting to believe anything he thought as he stepped through the archway. But immediately, he knew.
She was gone.
Her house was a mess, things had fallen everywhere, scattered around the room. But she wasn't. She was no where to be seen. "Oh no... Katara..."
Turning around, trying to hold back his tears, trying to keep the influx of thoughts out of his mind, he made his way back on to the street. His eyes darting back and forth, looking in every direction for a sign, any sign of what had happened and where she had gone.
But there was nothing there. She had disappeared without a trace.
No... she can't be gone. Aang sprinted toward the exit of the village, enhanced by his airbending for speed. He spotted Sokka as he stepped out of his house, but ran past as Sokka opened his mouth as if to speak. Aang didn't want to be distracted. I have to find her.
He exited the village and stopped a little further out to look around. There was nothing but darkness. He could barely see anything ahead of him as a blizzard began to start. The snow whipped through the air, some hitting his face, but he didn't care.
He tried desperately to make out anything from the darkness surrounding him, but it was useless.
No... "Noo!" Aang let out a scream. "Katara!" His voiced echoed in the night sky above. His dream felt so long ago, a distant memory of what was. A memory of what could have been, ripped away in the night.
She was lost. This is all my fault. How could I let this happen to her?
He fell to his hands and knees, feeling himself grow weak. The storm around him amplified, reflecting his pain. His body began to tremble, shaking violently.
But it wasn't the cold.
Tears now poured down his cheeks. He felt himself slipping, his vision beginning to fade. The ground around him seemed to light up, shaking along with him.
His body finally gave up.
He shouted once more, her name echoing in the sky above, before his vision faded completely, darkness overwhelming him.
See more
For the collective works of the author, go here.


text:
Interesting Facts About Cats You Did Not Know Until Now
It may seem fashionable to own an unique pet, but proudly owning an otter as a pet is unlawful in most localities and not using a allow. Polyphagia in cats is a situation where your pet develops an amazing appetite to the purpose of being ravenous, and whether it is severe enough, it could be described as being gluttony. And the hedgehog will get used to the children the extra time they spend with it. The children may even study to assist clean the cage and feed the pet hedgehog. Cats can get severe burns and never understand it, until nobility cats and pets it's too late, as they like heat. This will provide them with real residing meals that they can not get in a premixed feed, serving to them to remain happier and more healthy. If your cat will not be neutered at six months of age, he will likely be mature enough to reproduce now. That means it's not very advisable for people who find themselves just residing in temporary places to get a potbelly pig. Dogs and cats needs to be bathed usually and their utensils cleaned on day by day bases.
Pugs also make glorious pets for senior residents, who take pleasure in their laid again and friendly nature and their means to make good lap pets. In an try and fly during play classes, parrots can keep away from falling to the bottom hard with appropriate clipped wings. They just show their affection each time they really feel like doing so. Quite contrary to the common belief, cats do not like solitude. Arachidonic acids are an unsaturated fatty acid that african cats pets is essential for the growth of a kitten, and it acts as a precursor to several biological energetic compounds in your pet physique. You can use the pictures of your pet to design pet picture blankets or pet footage throw. If you discover it too costly then why not do one thing inventive and make your dog a number of pet carriers which are made from recycled materials. Get your kitten used to having his paws dealt with early on, in preparation on your trimming his claws.
First and foremost you should realize that animals like dogs and cats are naturally protecting of themselves round different animals. Soon cats had been raised to the identical level as royalty and it became in opposition to the regulation to harm one. Just like touch pets cats android all well being condition connected to animals, hyperthyroidism in cats may be very annoying, since your cat cannot tell you what is bothering her and you should put your efforts and spot that.
The canine is sweet and affectionate and makes a perfect bed warmer on a cold night, loving nothing greater than to twist up beneath the covers with its grasp. This dog does well to be socialised from an early age with other canines and animals, and this contains people. Dinosaur robot pets like the Pleo ( $380 on Amazon ) begin as a newly hatched child dinosaur that shows conduct similar to real younger creatures. In America, Dogs for Defense was formed, offering 1000's of canine to the military. Since I can not prove in any other case, I will accept cats as pets wiki this info for as close to the reality as I can get. Kittens which might be raised with out their mother or different cats to observe, do not do quite a lot of issues we think about normal habits for cats. You can see that feeding dry food for years on finish can result in a well being disaster on your pet. You attempt diversified outfits and make your personal modifications, whereas guaranteeing the comfort of your ferret after all.
It will save you a variety of time and frustration when you're busy with the infant in case your canine is aware of key commands, such cats as pets history as drop it," leave it," wait," and down/stay." Make positive you observe the instructions every day along with your canine.
Grade two will embrace canine that have experienced luxated kneecaps manually or from inside rotation of the tibia, which causes the luxation. Like humans, canines don't cats as pets essay at all times instinctively have great swimming type and may require assist learning to make use of their again legs to make paddling much less exhausting.
Author: Dilan BeliThis author has published 2445 articles so far. More info about the author is coming soon.


text:
Kalliemj Model
M IPhotographer Male Rochester, New York, US
My MM URL: http://www.modelmayhem.com/MIJPhoto
Mayhem # 2883593
About MeI am here to connect and work with people of from all modeling backgrounds and skill levels.
I do compensate my models whether it is prints, monetary or both. I always consider and collaborate with others to brainstorm. If you are interested, let know me and let's produce some great art.
Have you worked with M I? Add Credits for M I ! >>
Kalliemj Model
Aliaksandra R Model
Karrin Rachelle Model
UnabashedP... Model
Rose_18 Model
Pout Olivier Model
Loading Content


text:
HAROON Khan is targeting a title this year after winning his fourth straight fight as a professional.
The 22-year-old Bolton ace continued to make his name on the paid boxing scene when he won all four rounds against Francis Croes in Sheffield on Friday night.
He has impressed in all his fights since turning pro last year and now plans to move up to longer and bigger fights over a busy next 12 months.
"I'm getting better each fight," he told The Bolton News.
"I hit him with a few good shots and he kept coming back. But my stamina was good and it showed I can do four rounds no problem.
"I started and finished fast and next fight I want to try to do a six-rounder.
"I've sparred eight rounds no problem and I'm going to speak to Oliver (Harrison, his trainer) and the team about doing a few six rounds."
Super flyweight Khan, the younger brother of former world champion Amir, who is himself hoping to line up the biggest fight of his life against undisputed pound-for-pound best fighter in the world Floyd Mayweather, is planning a busy year in the ring.
He intends to have six to eight fights and over the next 12 months, and is determined to have something to show for it by the end of the year.
"I want to be fighting every six to eight weeks and my goal is to hold a title by the end of the year," he said.
"I don't care if it's a Central Area title, and English title or a British title, I just want a title."
On his latest victory – a resounding 40-36 success over Middlesbrough opponent Croes – on Friday night, he said: "It was good to be fighting back in Sheffield where I made my debut.
"I was surprised by how many supporters I had. The fan base is getting bigger every time I fight which is pushing me on to do well even more.
"And even though Croes has had many losses he is a game fighter.
"He had the heart of a lion and just kept coming back when others would have quit or gone down."
Harrison said: "Haroon did very well in there. I scored him an eight out of 10 which is very good in my book because I don't usually give such high ratings.
"I definitely think it was his best performance since he turned pro and I'm very happy with the progress he keeps on making in the gym.
"If he keeps learning he can go very far in the sport."


text:
Wallpaper contained on the CD for the original Castlevania X68000 game. They can be found as hidden files on the PS Castlevania Chronicles disk.
|Some of the contents of this page may contain graphics that were taken from Mr P's Castlevania Realm. They have been used with permission.
images originally found by Matheiu B.
Media in category "Chronicles Wallpaper"
The following 2 files are in this category, out of 2 total.
- X68000 Wallpaper1.jpg
- X68000 Wallpaper2.jpg


text:
Click to Close This Ad
You are going to Watch Wussywat the Clumsy Cat Episode 15 online free episodes with HQ / high quality. Stream cartoons Wussywat the Clumsy Cat Episode 15 Online Squeak, Wussywat discovers exploring and how to use binoculars. Duckadile's squeak is missing so Wussywat resolves to find it. He hears a squeak and catches it with a net, but it is Oggy's toy. He tears around the garden with Wussywat in tow. Wussywat hears a squeak from the flowers and pounces onto Ortus, who's polishing his binoculars. Wussywat spots a snail on the pond with the squeak using the binoculars. They use the net and rescue the trapped snail. Wussywat returns the squeak to Duckadile. What a clever cat!


text:
Want to buy a Buick Park Avenue? There is a large volume of resources available on the Autobytel website. Research current and past-productions Buick Park Avenue vehicles. Check out technical details on any automobile like dimensions, weight, horsepower, and more. Find the invoice price on Buick Park Avenue vehicles. If you are looking to buy a Buick Park Avenue then first read consumer reviews and analysis from professional automotive journalists. Browse hundreds of brand new or preowned Buick Park Avenue automobiles. You can do this all online from the comfort of your own home at the Autobytel site. Find vehicles available for purchase in your area. Choose a city or use your zip to see local dealer inventory.
The vast majority of automobile shoppers start their quest on the internet. Discover all there is to know about Buick Park Avenue vehicles. An authoritative site like Autobytel contains lots of info. See comprehensive data on almost every vehicle built over the last few years. Get an intelligent synopsis of the Buick Park Avenue. View the standard equipment that comes on the base vehicle which can include interior, exterior, performance, security, and convenience features. Check a vehicles dimensions, engine stats, and transmission facts under the technical data tab. The vehicle configurator at Autobytel.com allows you to add or subtract optional features. You can see how the invoice price is affected ahead of buying a Buick Park Avenue. Its easy to scrutinize an automobile at Autobytel. See how the Buick Park Avenue vehicle fairs against its opposition. Use the vehicle compare tool to see a couple of automobiles at the same time. Crash test ratings for your perspective automobile is something that can be looked up online at the Autobytel website. There is crash test data from both the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration and from the Insurance Institute for Highw
Autobytel has a huge assortment of car images available online for free. Not only are there Buick Park Avenue vehicle pictures of the outside; but there are pics of the seats, sound system, navigation, motor, and any other cool features. This will most often be the first place you should go to see the vehicle from different angles. Would you buy a hideous looking vehicle? Hopefully not, and when you go to buy a Buick Park Avenue you will know exactly how the vehicle looks thanks to your proper online research. Be sure to peruse the criticism and analysis from current Buick Park Avenue auto owners. This is a great way to see the pros and cons of each vehicle as told by regular consumers.
Do not buy a new car at the full MSRP price. There are often many incentives offered by either the manufacturer or the dealer that could save you thousands of dollars. Get cash back from the manufacturer when you buy a new vehicle. If you decide to finance a vehicle, there can be significant lowered rates being offered. Find Buick Park Avenue automobiles currently being offered by local car dealers. Make sure to check the listings of vehicles online at Autobytel before you buy a Buick Park Avenue. Shopping for a good deal can save you money in the end.


text:
|Reviews for Pictsie Dust
| Tris PhantomEvans chapter 1 . 3/29/2015
So here's my reaction:
Me: Squishy is a great name!
Me: Oh wow.
Me: Oh my God.
Me: OH MY GOD.
Me: HOLY CRAP.
Me: OH FUUUUUUUUUUUU...!
Me: *lost for words*
So there you have it. XDD
| Blood Red Tears chapter 1 . 10/13/2014
Hahahaha That was bloody awesome! High Cas is a good Cas, expectly with Sam in the room. Heh
Lol love the thought too that Cas would over react to Barney. "He loves me too! " XD hahaha
| Anaethen chapter 1 . 8/2/2014
"Minifridge: ...This is so small..."
Brilliant! XD
| The Third Biker Scholar chapter 1 . 5/22/2014
*eyes wide, blushing* Oh My! Wow.
| Leydhawk chapter 1 . 4/24/2014
LOL whew! That's hot...
| ash chapter 1 . 7/31/2013
sooo good, loved this
| equalsMCsquare chapter 1 . 3/24/2013
"Dude, are you letting the angel watch porn again?"
Your writing is HILARIOUS I'm in stitches haha
| ColonelPony chapter 1 . 11/29/2012
Ho. Ly. Fuck.
That was both excruciatingly hilariously and ridiculously sexy. I would just LOVE to see more like this. I adore this pairing, and this story was just perfect (perfect incorporating cute, funny, sexy, and sweet). :3
| Halan Lore chapter 1 . 10/14/2012
Uhhh... :brain melts in a pleasant way: I'm going to go clean that up.
| andaere chapter 1 . 9/13/2012
Hehe. Great story! Cute, funny, and hot. Stoned!Cas was absolutely hilarious. I loved the list of stuff that captured his attention, especially the quotes that went along with some of them. Dean's amusement at Sam's "suffering" was funny and in character. I like how Sam was trying to be good at first and distract Cas from sex by talking about slinkies or whatever but ended up just melting completely. (I don't blame him!)
Some favorite lines:
"'I love everything,' the angel sighs blissfully.
'I hate everyone,' Sam says darkly." - Very humorous counterpoint. Made me laugh. :D
"The pose is disconcertingly loverlike in a way Sam has been manfully ignoring, ever since he managed to lure Castiel away from the marshmallow spread with the promise of more awkward hugs and his shiny, shiny hair." - LOL. You really use Sam's voice to your advantage to fill this 'fic with humor. I love "manfully ignoring" and "shiny, shiny hair." "Awkward hugs" just reminded me of the Sam/Cas almost-hug in Season 6, which always makes me sad... :(
Thanks for writing this! :)
| XxJrHazardxX chapter 1 . 9/9/2012
Cute AND hot! Love everything about it
| Loubee1977 chapter 1 . 8/25/2012
Hilarious and really hot! Loved it!
| aLoggedInReader chapter 1 . 7/30/2012
Okay... stoned!Cas is damn funny!
Thanks for sharing this! :-D


text:
Tapas Brindisa Map
46 Broadwick St.
020-7534 1690 | Make Restaurant Reservations
Underground: Oxford Circus/Piccadilly Circus
Need directions to Tapas Brindisa? This map will help you find the best route to and from the restaurant so you can enjoy your meal. Clicking on the green arrow can help you get the best route to and from this restaurant if you don't see the "Get directions" pop-up.
Find out which restaurants and chefs top the list of GAYOT's 2016 Annual Restaurant Awards.


text: About Gardening Express If you've not purchased from Gardening Express before, you've just discovered a well kept secret that gardeners in the know have been enjoying for years. From a small concern into a fully fledged wing of the UK's horticultural army; supplying all types of people their plants, Gardening Express offers you a fantastically large range at the most competitive of prices. Gardening Express has a massive variety of products and dedication to these cornerstones, the business is now a real force to be reckoned with in mail order Gardening.


text:
Vectortone/Production Simplle Presents
Wick-It The Instigator
Fri, January 20, 2017
Doors: 9:00 pm / Show: 10:00 pm
Louisville, KY
$10.00 - $12.00
Tickets at the Door
This event is 21 and overhttp://zanzabarlouisville.ticketfly.com/event/1400847/
Wick-It The Instigator
He's got a reputation for doing some thoughtfully fresh and mindblowingly original remixes that take him from beyond a standard dub step or mash-up artist to a DJ/producer with skills that have turned heads and caught ears all over the Southeast. In a live setting, he sends people off with his mix of humor, ingenious pop culture samples and beats that can't be touched. While his roots are firmly planted in hip hop, there is no shortage of heavy electronic bass music at a Wick-it show.
Venue Information:
2100 South Preston Street
Louisville, KY, 40217
2100 South Preston Street
Louisville, KY, 40217


text:
This website requires cookies to provide all of its features. For more information on what data is contained in the cookies, please see our Privacy Policy page. To accept cookies from this site, please click the Allow button below.
We use cookie for our website to work flawlessly. By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
26 tracks of finest '50s rockin' rollin' vocal group sounds from New York's Voxpoppers, including their 1958 hit Wishing For Your Love.The Bellhops started out in 1956 before becoming The Voxpoppers a year later, recording not only Doo-Wop songs, but showing off their talent on other rock 'n' roll styles.
Raucous Records is the longest establisted 1950s Rock 'n' Roll, Rockabilly and Psychobilly CD, DVD and vinyl specialist on the internet.A world of Rockabilly, Psychobilly, Surf, Swing and 1950s Rock 'n' Roll delivered to your door.
© Raucous Records 2017 All Rights Reserved


text:
Cute, compact and totally orgasmic, this super-smooth and veined jelly dildo vibrator is a great choice and a gorgeous addition to your sex life. It includes a textured shaft for added stimulation, multi-speed vibrations maximum satisfaction and this fab vibrator is also fully waterproof - so that you can enjoy it wherever you want to.
Cute, compact and totally orgasmic, this super-smooth and veined jelly dildo vibrator is a great choice and a gorgeous addition to your sex life. It includes a textured shaft for added stimulation, multi-speed vibrations maximum satisfaction and this fab vibrator is also fully waterproof - so that you can enjoy it wherever you want to.
- Product Specifications
Colour Hot Pink Material Solid Jelly Rubber Functions Wireless Multi-Speed Vibrating Insertable Length 5" Total Length 6" Shaft Circumference 5" Flexible? Flexible and Firm Waterproof? Yes, Fully. Please ensure the battery cap is securely fastened
- Delivery Information
Same Day Dispatch - Discreet Delivery and Billing
Delivery Options How Fast How Much Free On Orders Over UK Royal Mail Tracked 48 2 Days £2.85 Per Order Free Over £19.99 UK Royal Mail Tracked 24 1 Day £3.85 Per Order Free Over £39.99 UK Special Delivery 1 Day Guaranteed £5.95 Per Order Free Over £89.99 The Republic of Ireland 3-5 Days £2.95 Per Order Free Over £20.00 EU Delivery 5-10 Days £3.99 Per Item USA and Worldwide Delivery 10-15 Days £4.99 Per Item
If you require further information, please contact our customer services team.
- Full Description
Make all your dreams come true and find the perfect partner with this deliciously realistic dildo vibrator and we swear you'll never go back! This very tempting dildo shaped vibrator is made from flexible jelly and the realistic moulding gives you gorgeous internal stimulation. Trembling with multi-speed vibrations, this fantastic dildo vibrator fills you with pleasure and sends you straight to heaven - guaranteed. Fully waterproof.
- Customer ReviewsMighty Pretty!
This vibrator is waterproof, cheap and powerful. Everything I could ask for in a sex toy. I use it every day and it never disappoints me. It's wonderful to use in the bath. Quiet and flexible. Realistic looking and feeling. And the colour is mighty pretty!Review by:Super Jelly Vibrator
I chose this vibe because it has everything I want. It's waterproof. Cheap. Pink. Made of jelly, one of my favorite materials. Realistic looking and feeling. It gives me orgasms just like it's supposed to. Shipping was fast, too. I'm a very satisfied customer.Review by:pink jelly vibrator
It's big, waterproof, and cheap. Was in stock and shipped fast. The vibrations are powerful and they give me fab orgasms. That's all I ask. Got what I wanted. I'm a happy customer.Review by:Waterproof and BIG
Wow, what a wonderful vibrator! Waterproof and BIG. It's nice and thick with veins, texture, big balls and a rounded head. The jelly material is soft and flexible where it counts. This vibrator is a great price and it suits me just fine. I'm very happy with the orgasms I get from it. Thanks!Review by:
Reviews should be constructive, around 50 words long, should not contain swearing and must relate to an order (and the products within) placed with the submitted email address.
If these criteria are not met, your review will be rejected.
All reviews are moderated before publishing.
If you have a question regarding a product/order or regarding Customer Service please contact [email protected]
- Private Dick Big Vibrating Dildo - 8 Inch OUR PRICE £13.99
- Soft Loveskin Realistic Vibrating Dildo - 8.5 Inch OUR PRICE £17.99
- Natural Vibrating Dildo - 8 Inch OUR PRICE £4.99
- Big Boy Vibrating Dildo - 9.5 Inch OUR PRICE £11.99
- Purple Super Jelly Vibrating Dildo - 6.5 Inch OUR PRICE £11.99


text:
April 1, 2004 - PALM BEACH, Fla. — When Dolphins General Manager Rick Spielman was asked this week at the NFL owners meetings about the rise in excessive touchdown celebrations, his face flashed a look of disgust. "I think it's classless," he said. "It's a profession and it's an image and I think guys ought to act like they've been there before."
32 NFL owners break in unison - Rocky Mountain News - Lee Rasizer
April 1, 2004 - PALM BEACH, Fla. - A powerful and influential group of 32 NFL owners was reduced to a bunch of "yes" men Wednesday. All 10 rules proposals recommended by the competition committee were adopted as the annual spring meetings concluded. Foremost among the changes was one adding a 15-yard penalty to possible fines for orchestrated on-field celebrations. The Oakland Raiders cast the only dissenting vote.
Gibbs already high on Portis - Rocky Mountain News - Lynn DeBruin
April 1, 2004 - PALM BEACH, Fla. - It hasn't taken Clinton Portis very long to endear himself to new coach Joe Gibbs in Washington. "He's got a little funny bone," Gibbs said Wednesday during a coaches' breakfast at the NFL owners meetings. "You kind of like being around him."
Injury Update: With Thumb Healed, Mitchell Heads for Amsterdam - Denver Broncos.com - Andrew Mason
Wednesday, March 31, 2004 - Clint Mitchell was a long way from Denver throughout most of March, but he was actually right at home. Before his trans-Atlantic crossing to Amsterdam to play for the Admirals of NFL Europe, Mitchell spent a few weeks in the team's training camp, which took place in venues around the Tampa Bay area of Florida, his home base.
K.C. inks Dalton - Jefferson City News Tribune
Wednesday, Mar 31, 2004 - KANSAS CITY (AP) -- Defensive tackle Lional Dalton agreed to a two-year contract with the Kansas City Chiefs, the team announced Tuesday. Terms of his contract were not disclosed. Dalton, 6-foot-1, 315 pounds, had 17 tackles and one sack in 12 games for the Washington Redskins last year. He spent the 2002 season with the Denver Broncos after entering the NFL in 1998 with the Baltimore Ravens.