text:
Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font
Join or Leave AEJMC
Reply |
Post New Message
Search Archives
(1026 lines)
Enlisting the Black Press: The War
Department's Editors Conference of 1918
Worried that blacks, who were smarting from repression, would refuse to support
World War I, the War Department held a conference with 31 of the nation's
leading black editors in June of 1918. The gathering was a seminal event in the
relationship between the black press and the U.S. government in wartime. It led
to President Woodrow Wilson making a public denunciation of lynching and
commuting the sentences of 10 black soldiers who had been sentenced to death for
World War I forced the Wilson administration to take on a wartime challenge
that no previous U.S. government had ever faced: Deploying a huge military
machine overseas. Transporting a million men to France was only part of the
task. Supplying them required not only mobilizing industry to produce materiel
but also a special effort to maximize food production. The magnitude of the
effort meant that all Americans, military and civilian, needed to pull together,
war planners emphasized.
Many in the black community, which accounted for one-eighth of the U.S.
population of about 100 million, were in no mood to cooperate, however. The
reason was that repression of blacks was worse in the years leading up to U.S.
participation in the war than it had been in decades.[1] It included a
continuing epidemic of lynching,[2] white-provoked race riots,[3] plus
expansion of segregation in housing[4], public accommodations and public
transportation.[5] Many blacks questioned why they should help a government
they believed had turned its back on them.
The black press was fervent about bringing racial injustices to
African-Americans' attention. It not only covered the injustices in news
stories, but railed against them in stinging commentaries. The Wilson
administration viewed the publications as such a galvanizer of African-American
anger that it believed they threatened the war effort. Only days after the
United States declared war on Germany on April 6, 1917, government intelligence
officials began trying to intimidate the black publications they considered the
shrillest to tone down their rhetoric. Although they softened their language,
the handful of publications the officials had targeted continued to speak out.
Since the government had the resources to go after only a few black
publications, most of the nation's 200 black newspapers and magazines continued
to hammer away at injustices with the same verve. The extensive coverage of
racial repression in both the targeted and non-targeted publications was one
reason that a year later anger in the black community was still running high.
At this point the administration decided to try a public-relations approach to
get the black press "on the team." In June of 1918 the War Department held a
conference with 31 of the nation's most prominent black editors that was one of
the most visible government overtures to African-Americans since Emancipation.
The three-day conference helped the administration achieve its goal of
persuading more black newspapers to tone down the stridentness of their
complaints about racial repression until the war was over. It even persuaded
some editors who had been lukewarm about the war effort to become ardent
Although the conference failed to generate civil rights advancements for
blacks, it did lead to two symbolically important race-related gestures from an
American president. One was a public condemnation of lynching, although the
race-neutral wording of Woodrow Wilson's declaration made it bittersweet to some
blacks. The other was the commutation of the death sentences of 10 black
soldiers convicted of rioting.
The conference also played a part in W.E.B. DuBois's losing his undisputed
position as the leader of the civil rights movement.[6] After he helped steer
the other editors to the enthusiastic endorsement of the war effort that the
government had wanted, his publication, the NAACP monthly the Crisis, published
a surprising accommodationist editorial he had written.[7] Then the news
surfaced that the race's foremost radical was ready to accept a War Department
offer of a military commission.[8] Many blacks accused the once-uncompromising
champion of the race of writing the editorial specifically to get the
commission.[9] The damage to DuBois's credibility led to younger leaders in
the militant wing of the civil rights movement attracting supporters DuBois had
had, creating disunity for decades.[10]
Although the conference helped the government obtain a more supportive black
press in the short term, an irony was that black publications became even more
strident about racial grievances after the war.[11] The fact that the
government had gone to such pains to court them made the editors realize how
much power they had over black public opinion. When the war ended in late 1918,
eliminating the need to tone down their rhetoric about injustices, black editors
became more militant in leading the charge for equality.[12]
The topic of the black press during World War I has been attracting increasing
attention in recent years. Mark Ellis has examined how the government tried to
persuade black publications to support the war effort with propaganda,
intimidation and flattery.[13] The propaganda effort involved the wartime
propaganda agency, the Committee on Public Information, sending news releases to
black publications. The flattery component involved reaching out to the editors
by convening the conference. The intimidation effort involved threatening
editors who were too strident with prosecution under the Espionage or Sedition
acts, or cutting off their postal privileges. Theodore Kornweibel Jr. has done
the most extensive research on the intimidation effort.[14] Jane Lang Scheiber
and Harry N. Scheiber have pointed out that Wilson's reaching out to blacks was
done only to get them aboard the war effort -- that the president never intended
to pursue policies that would afford African-Americans permanent civil rights
gains.[15] David Levering Lewis has taken the most comprehensive look at the
life of W.E.B. DuBois, including DuBois's leadership role at the editors
conference and the circumstances under which he wrote "Close Ranks" and was
offered a military commission.[16]
No author has made a comprehensive examination of the black editors conference,
however. The purpose of this paper is to examine the conference as one of the
seminal events in the history of the black press's relationship with the U.S.
government during wartime. The examination will include a close look at the two
documents the black editors crafted at the conference, and how black
publications such as the Washington Bee and Chicago Defender covered the
conference and its aftermath.
Why the government saw the black press as a threat
The conference occurred during a golden era for black publications, both in
circulation and in the quality of editors. Circulation at leading publications,
a few of them monthlies but most of them weeklies, exploded during the war years
of 1914 to 1918. The Crisis, the monthly paper of the NAACP, which DuBois
edited, jumped from 41,000 subscribers in 1917 to 74,000 in 1918 and to 104,000
in 1919.[17] The circulation of Robert S. Abbott's weekly Chicago Defender
soared tenfold, from 12,000 to 120,000, between 1916 and 1918.[18] Two reasons
for the surges were national circulation campaigns that led to the Crisis, for
example, being sold in all 48 states, plus the migration during the war of
hundreds of thousands of rural Southern blacks to Northern cities such as
Chicago with black publications. All told, the nation's black newspapers were
reaching millions of readers a week by the time the War Department convened the
editors conference.
The raw circulation numbers were not the only reason the government decided to
reach out to black papers, however. Another was the eloquence of the editors,
which reflected the fervor they brought to a position they viewed as
encompassing both civil rights leader as well as journalist. The articulate,
often-emotional reproofs of DuBois, Abbott and their comrades dug deep into the
souls of many in the black community.[19]
When Secretary of War Newton Baker told black leaders in the fall of 1917 that
the War Department had only a limited capacity to address racial inequalities,
Washington Bee Editor W. Calvin Chase responded: "We did accept this, the war,
'as an opportunity to serve,' and we mean to serve, and serve loyally and
valiantly, but we have a right, as American citizens without one single break in
our 250 years of loyalty and dependableness, to at least respectfully request we
be 'served' also; that we, when the country needs men, loyal men, be given equal
opportunities and equal privileges in every branch of the service, without
respect to our color or race."[20] Other editors besides Chase with the power
to arouse readers included Robert L. Vann of the Pittsburgh Courier, William
Monroe Trotter of the Boston Guardian, Fred S. Moore of the New York Age, J.H.
Murphy of the Baltimore Afro-American, Ed Warren of the Amsterdam News and A.
Philip Randolph of the Messenger.[21]
Unfortunately for the nation's 12 million African-Americans, black editors had
a long list of racial injustices to write about during the war years, some on
the civilian front and some on the military front. On the civilian front, white
mobs lynched an average of 65 blacks a year between 1910 and 1919.[22] A
white-instigated race riot in July of 1917 in East St. Louis, Illinois, killed
39 blacks.[23] In August of 1917, 125 black soldiers retaliated against weeks
of provocation by whites in Houston by shooting up the city, killing 17 whites
-- with the result that 29 of the soldiers were sentenced to death.[24]
While these injustices were occurring, Woodrow Wilson, who during his campaign
for president in 1912 had pledged to improve the status of blacks, abandoned the
pledge the first time members of Congress from his political power base in the
South challenged him.[25] He not only dropped his plans to appoint
African-Americans to patronage positions the race had traditionally held but
also went along with three Cabinet members' moves to segregate working, dining
and toilet facilities in federal offices under their purview.[26] Meanwhile,
states, municipalities and even Congress passed or attempted to pass dozens of
laws mandating segregation in housing, public accommodations and public
transportation during the Wilson years.[27]
By the time the United States entered the war in 1917, black editors were so
outraged over what was happening on the civilian front -- especially the
lynching and race riots -- that even moderate publications showed flashes of
militancy. Shortly after the St. Louis riot, which was started by striking
white union members angry about black strikebreakers, Washington Bee columnist
J.J. Cunningham advised African-Americans to arm themselves. "We are
law-abiding, but since we are being pursued and shot down in the streets, and
our homes are being destroyed by the miserable ruffians of this country, and
since the authorities of the law refuse to give us the protection which is due
us, the colored people are compelled, from this time on, to be prepared to
defend themselves when their homes are being attacked by these ruffians," he
wrote. "Let us continue to gather at the house of prayer, and pour out our
complaints to Almighty God, but don't forget that prayers will never do the work
of bullets. . . . you'd better sleep with your loaded guns under your heads,
for you know not what hour the mobs will attack you."[28]
Although many African-Americans were eager to don a uniform because of the
possibility of advancement, they found repression on the military front as well.
Southern congressmen wanted no African-Americans in the Army beyond the four
all-black regiments that had existed since the Civil War. They persuaded
government officials to accept only white volunteers for military service. The
reason was that an all-races enlistment program might have led to blacks being
allowed to become sailors and Marines, positions long denied them. The
Southerners even tried -- though they failed -- to include language in
military-manpower legislation that would have prevented the government from
drafting blacks. Their fear was that hundreds of thousands of African-Americans
with arms training would be a threat to the South.[29] The government rejected
their request on grounds that it needed the additional manpower on the
Many African-Americans in training camps were subjected to racist verbal and
physical abuse, and the toughest, dirtiest extra duties were often foisted off
on blacks.[30] Saying they were trying to reduce the chance that black
soldiers would be harassed by local whites, many of the soldiers' superiors in
Southern cantonments granted them less off-post time than whites. In France,
white American officers tried to persuade French officers to abandon their
traditional equitable treatment of blacks in favor of the segregated, repressive
treatment blacks received in the United States.[31]
The combination of repression of African-Americans in their hometowns, on U.S.
military posts and at military assignments overseas prompted many black editors
to make an argument in their columns that the War Department felt was
particularly threatening to its mobilization effort: Why should blacks fight
overseas to save the world for democracy when they were unable to enjoy the
fruits of democracy at home?[32] When Secretary of War Baker commented in
December of 1917 that wartime was not the time to settle the race question,[33]
the Washington Bee asked: "The race question must be settled some time, and
what is a better time than the time when the aggrieved ones are waiting for the
command to plunge into battle, to offer their blood, their lives to 'make the
world safe for democracy?'"[34] "Now is the time to let the world know we are
not satisfied," agreed the St. Louis Argus.[35]
The government's first attempt to solve the black press problem, which it
instituted more than a year before the editors conference, involved intimidating
editors whose publications it considered inflammatory. None of the editors it
targeted had called on blacks to oppose the war. They had simply decried racial
injustices. The difference between the targeted editors' publications and the
"acceptable" ones was the shrillness of the words used to denounce the
The first target of the intimidation effort was Robert S. Abbott of the Chicago
Defender on April 13, 1917, only a week after the United States entered the
war.[36] Others included DuBois of the Crisis, J.H. Murphy of the Baltimore
Afro-American, J.E. Mitchell of the St. Louis Argus , Cyril Briggs of the
Amsterdam News and A. Philip Randolph and Chandler Owen of the Messenger.[37]
The government went so far as to prosecute and send to prison one editor, G.W.
Bouldin of the San Antonio Inquirer, whose crime was condoning in print the
black soldiers' riot in Houston.[38] Some in the government, such as Major
Joel Spingarn, who had become head of an Army intelligence section dealing with
the black population after being chairman of the NAACP, were uncomfortable with
the strategy of intimidating the editors, however. Spingarn and others believed
the government could gain more by reaching out.
The lead-up to the conference
A warning that Robert Moton, head of the Tuskegee Institute, gave Wilson in the
spring of 1918 was a galvanizing force in the convening of the black editors
conference. Moton said he had never seen African-Americans so restive.[39]
At the time, the U.S. declaration of war against Germany was a year old, but
deployment of most of the troops the country would send to Europe -- and thus
most of the U.S. fighting -- lay ahead. Coming from an influential
accommodationist like Moton, who had succeeded Booker T. Washington at Tuskegee,
the warning struck a chord with administration officials prosecuting the war.
These officials knew it was imperative that blacks -- because of their sheer
numbers -- were fully behind the war effort, both in uniform and on the civilian
job front.[40]
The actual idea for the editors conference came from Major Spingarn of the
Army's Military Intelligence Bureau.[41] Before joining the Army for the war
effort, the independently wealthy former Columbia University literature
professor had worked closely with DuBois at the NAACP. In fact, the two were
friends as well as co-workers. Spingarn also knew other prominent black editors
from firsthand experience or by reputation.
He suggested the conference to Emmett J. Scott, an African-American whom
Secretary of War Newton Baker in October of 1917 had appointed a special liaison
for black military affairs.[42] Scott took the idea to George Creel, head of
the government's wartime propaganda arm, the Committee on Public Information.
Creel persuaded Baker and other administration officials it was a good idea.[43]
Baker agreed that Scott, a racial moderate whom many black editors respected,
should preside at the conference.[44] Scott was optimistic about the
conference's impact on the editors, predicting to Creel that it would help lead
black public opinion "along helpful lines rather than along lines that make for
discontent and unrest."[45] The lineup of speakers justified his optimism,
consisting of men likely to appeal to the hearts as well as the minds of the
Besides Scott and Creel, speakers included Secretary of War Baker; Assistant
Secretary of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt; Edward N. Hurley, chairman of the
United States Shipping Board, the agency in charge of dispatching troops and
supplies to Europe; Major Joel Spingarn; his brother, Captain Arthur S. Spingarn
of the Army's Medical Reserve Corps, whose civilian law firm had served the
NAACP; and three French military officers: General Paul Vignal, military attache
to the French Embassy, and Majors Edouard Requin and L.P. DeMontal of the French
High Command.[46]
Baker was considered the most progressive of Roosevelt's cabinet members on
civil rights. He had gained a reputation while mayor of Cleveland of being able
to work with blacks.[47] As secretary of the War Department, he had instituted
a number of programs to improve blacks' status in the military, including a
black Army officer training camp, the placement of blacks in such specialized
Army units as the artillery corps and signal corps, even the integration of some
Army units. DuBois had saluted Baker in a Crisis editorial in December 1917,
saying that the secretary had not done "everything we could wish, but he has
accomplished so much more than President Wilson or any other member of this
administration that he deserves all praise."[48]
One reason Roosevelt was at the conference was to soothe ruffled feathers over
segregation that the Navy Department had imposed at its Washington headquarters.
In the early days of the Wilson administration, Roosevelt's boss, Navy Secretary
Josephus Daniels of North Carolina, had ordered separate working, dining and
toilet facilities for blacks. Until Daniels' move, and similar ones by Treasury
Secretary William G. McAdoo of Georgia and Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson
of Texas, there had been no segregation in federal offices.[49] Blacks saw it
as a major step backward and deeply resented it. While the black editors would
have been hostile to Daniels, the conference organizers figured correctly that
they would be receptive to Roosevelt, a New Yorker with a reputation as a
Most black editors liked George Creel, for at least two reasons. First, he was
a professional comrade -- a former crusading newspaperman. He also had been
feeding them interesting stories about the war effort, helping them fill their
papers' columns.[50] Many black papers were carrying a page or more of such
mobilization news every week. Topics ranged from war bond drives to wealthy
socialites volunteering to become military nurses to German atrocities. When he
could, Creel served up race-specific stories: Yarns about a black man who had
13 sons in uniform, about black soldiers' bayoneting skills, and about a black
soldier who captured hounds the Germans had been using to track the enemy by
dragging a dead fox ahead of the dogs.[51]
The appearance of the French officers also was designed to appeal to the black
editors' hearts. Of course it was appropriate that the black editors receive a
briefing on the state of the war and the challenges that lay ahead. But
American military experts could have given them that. One reason the French
officers were invited to speak was that African-Americans had a good feeling
toward the French, knowing they treated blacks well.[52] Stories about French
equanimity toward black soldiers -- both France's own Senegalese units and
African-American troops -- had appeared in America's black press since the war
began.[53] The French, according to the stories, were colorblind, judging a
man on his merits.
Creel had asked Wilson to attend the gathering, but on June 18, the day before
the event began, the president declined. Admitting that he had never come
through on his 1912 campaign pledge to help blacks, he said in a note to Creel:
"My own judgment is that it probably would do no good for me to see them. I
have received several delegations of Negroes, and I am under the impression that
they have gone away dissatisfied. I have never had an opportunity actually to
do what I promised them I would seek an opportunity to do." [54]
A reason that Wilson failed to mention but that was probably closer to the
truth for his turning down Creel's request was the president's desire to avoid a
confrontation with the black editors. He had had a nasty meeting four years
earlier with one of the editors who had been invited to the conference --
William Monroe Trotter of the Boston Guardian. The fiery Trotter, who had
campaigned for Wilson in the 1912 election, began haranguing the president
during a meeting in the Oval Office in November of 1914 for breaking his promise
to help blacks achieve their rights. The exchange became so heated that Wilson
threw Trotter out of his office.[55]
As it turned out, Trotter did not attend the black editors conference. He said
he could smell a sellout.[56] Most of the nation's star black editors showed
up, however. DuBois of the Crisis was there, as was Abbott of the Chicago
Defender, Vann of the Pittsburgh Courier, Moore of the New York Age, Murphy of
the Baltimore Afro-American and Warren of the Amsterdam News .[57] Randolph of
the Messenger, a Socialist, was considered too radical to invite and probably
would have refused to come if he had been.[58]
The conference itself
Scott opened the conference by reminding the participants, who included 14
black educators, clergymen and office holders in addition to the 31 editors,
that they had been invited to help the government get blacks behind the war
effort. "This is not the time to discuss race problems," he said. "Our first
duty is to fight, and to continue to fight until the war is won. Then we can
adjust the problems that remain in the life of the colored man."[59]
His admonition may have been for the benefit of the administration officials at
the conference, for after these officials spoke he proceeded to do what he had
said he wouldn't -- let the editors air their racial grievances. The Washington
Bee, represented by Editor W. Calvin Chase, reported that "the discussion
covered a wide range, and the conferees were given an opportunity to present
their views, reflecting the state of mind of the colored people of the country,
with the utmost freedom and frankness."[60]
The coverage of the Washington Bee, the Chicago Defender and the Crisis
omitted the specifics of the give-and-take with the administration officials. A
possible explanation as to why is that the government asked the editors not to
report specifics in order to facilitate the most candid exchange possible, and
the editors complied. Some of the issues the editors raised were explosive.
One was a rumor that the U.S. command in France was using black troops as shock
troops -- sending them into the first waves of battles where they would take the
heaviest casualties.[61] Although the officials at the War Department
conference told the editors correctly that the rumor was untrue, George Creel
was savvy enough to realize that reporting the rumor -- even with a government
denial attached to it-- would disturb many in the black community. Not
reporting any frank exchanges that occurred along the way to a cooperative
wrapup would have the effect of making coverage of the conference unremittingly
positive -- which is the way it turned out to be.
At the end of the conference the editors passed a resolution about black
participation in the war effort that amounted to their overarching philosophy on
the issue. They also put together a list of 14 race-related grievances they
said the government should address quickly if it wanted to ensure blacks'
enthusiastic support.[62] DuBois, the self-appointed leader of the editors at
the conference, crafted the resolution, which the others accepted with minor
changes.[63] All 31 editors signed it.
The resolution, entitled the "Address to the Committee on Public Information,"
began with a declaration of blacks' loyalty toward their country and their
belief that it was vital that the Germans be defeated. "We American Negroes
wish to affirm, first of all, our unalterable belief that the defeat of the
German government and what it today represents is of paramount importance to the
welfare of the world in general and to our people in particular," it said. "We
deem it hardly necessary, in view of the untarnished record of Negro Americans
(in previous wars), to reaffirm our loyalty to Our Country and our readiness to
win this war. We wish to use our every endeavor to keep all of these 12 million
people at the highest pitch, not simply of passive loyalty, but of active,
enthusiastic and self-sacrificing participation in the war."[64]
The resolution maintained, however, that loyalty was a two-way street, that the
government needed to take immediate steps to remedy injustices if it wanted
their unmitigated support. Today, it said, "justifiable grievances of the
colored people are producing not disloyalty, but an amount of unrest and
bitterness which even the best efforts of their leaders may not be always able
to guide, unless they can have the active and sympathetic cooperation of the
National and State governments."[65] And it concluded:
The American Negro does not expect to have the whole Negro problem
settled immediately; he is not seeking to hold up a striving country and a
distracted world by pushing irrelevant personal grievances as a price of
loyalty; he is not disposed to catalogue, in this tremendous crisis, all his
complaints and disabilities; he is more than willing to do his full share in
helping to win the war for democracy and he expects his full share of the
fruits thereof -- but he is today compelled to ask for that minimum of
consideration which will enable him to be an efficient fighter for
victory . . .[66]
The "minimum of consideration" was spelled out in the 14-point "Bill of
Particulars" that the editors crafted. Heading the list of demands was a
federal law against lynching. Another demand dealing with the hanging of blacks
was presidential pardons for the 61 African-American troops convicted in the
Houston riot of 1917.[67] Sixteen of them faced the death penalty.[68]
Eight of the 14 demands dealt with better treatment of or increased
opportunities for blacks in the military. The first was allowing blacks who
wanted to serve to enlist rather than be at the mercy of the draft. The second
was allowing African-Americans to become sailors instead of just cooks in the
Navy. The third was ensuring that blacks in the Army could be in combat units
rather than being limited to stevedore or other labor units. The fourth was
hiring African-American nurses to care for wounded or sick black troops. The
fifth was increasing the number of black physicians beyond the few dozen already
in the service.[69]
The sixth was expanding the ranks of the approximately 700 black Army officers.
The seventh was the lifting of an unspoken prohibition on promotion of all but a
token number of black officers into the field grades -- the ranks of major,
lieutenant colonel and colonel. The eighth was the recalling to active duty of
Colonel Charles Young, who had been the highest-ranking black in the Army. He
had been forcibly retired for supposed health problems in the spring of 1918
after Southern white officers had threatened to refuse to take orders from
Two of the editors' demands dealt with press coverage of blacks in the
military. One was that black reporters be allowed to cover African-American
soldiers at home and abroad. The other -- a two-pronged demand -- was ironic in
that it flew in the face of press freedom. The first prong was that the
government take steps to prevent white newspapers from running derogatory
stories about black troops -- stories suggesting, for example, that blacks
should not be allowed in certain roles, such as artillery officer, because they
were not smart enough. The second prong was that the government persuade white
newspapers to mention blacks' contributions in previous wars.[71]
The editors' final two demands were for an end to Jim Crow practices in public
transportation and for a loan to Liberia, the financially strapped African
nation founded by freed American slaves, which had recently joined the war on
the Allies' side.[72]
Conference organizers were pleased with the editors' pledge to try to persuade
African-Americans to become enthusiastic supporters of the war effort, even
though the editors had tied the pledge to the administration's addressing their
14 demands. "This was the kind of commitment that the organizers had hoped
for, and the fact that it came from the pen of DuBois, the most influential of
the radical black editors, was all the more gratifying," Mark Ellis noted.[73]
Creel told Wilson that the conference was "all that we could have wished for in
the way of support and understanding," and Baker assured the president that the
gathering meant that the "influence of the Negro press is going to be
sounder."[74] Spingarn reported to his superiors in the Military Intelligence
Bureau that the "moderate" demands the editors had raised could be addressed
"without fundamental social readjustments."[75]
The black editors also appeared satisfied with the conference. Spingarn told
his superiors they were "pleased at having been taken into the confidence of the
Government and asked for advice and cooperation."[76] The Washington Bee
editorialized: "That much good will eventuate from that conference there is not
a particle of doubt in the minds of those who were parties to it and who know
and understand the signs of the times."[77] Military Intelligence officials
noted that some editors who before the conference had beat the drum of racial
injustice but had been reluctant to support the war effort took a more balanced
approach afterward. The conference had a "salutary effect" in particular on
J.E. Mitchell of the St. Louis Argus, one intelligence official said. Mitchell
returned home convinced that he had a responsibility not just to continue
pointing out injustices but also to try to keep black morale high during the
Government steps to address editors' demands
The editors became even more euphoric than at the wrapup of the conference when
the government moved swiftly to address some of their 14 demands. Although he
declined to seek a federal law against lynching, as the editors had wanted,
Wilson did the next best thing: He brought the moral force of the presidency to
bear on the issue by publicly condemning vigilante hangings. He responded to
the editors' demand for presidential clemency for 61 of the black soldiers
convicted in the Houston riot by reducing the sentences of 10 soldiers from
death to life imprisonment. Although it fell far short of clemency for all, the
black community considered Wilson's move of commutation for some an important
Wilson's administration addressed the editors' demand that black journalists be
allowed access to African-American military units at home and abroad by issuing
war-correspondent credentials to Ralph Tyler, a newspaper man from Columbus,
Ohio, who had once been a Navy Department auditor.[79] Although he arrived at
the battlefront in France only six weeks before the armistice, Tyler was able to
write several stories about the fighting that black troops saw.[80] The
administration also agreed to the demand that it hire black nurses to care for
injured or sick black soldiers, although by the end of the war it had deployed
only a handful of them.[81] In addition, it returned Colonel Young to active
duty, although this happened less than two weeks before the war was over.[82]
Of the demands that the government acted on, lynching was the most important to
African-Americans. A lynching law would have been a real civil rights
advancement for blacks because federal enforcement would have brought to justice
many lynchers whom state prosecutors in the South would have refused to bring
charges against. Introducing or supporting federal legislation would have
alienated so many Southern politicians that it would have been political suicide
for Wilson, however. And it would have been impossible to get such a bill
through Congress anyway. Southerners would have filibustered it until it died
-- as they did twice when such legislation was introduced after Wilson left
Even a presidential condemnation of lynching carried with it the risk of
eroding Wilson's Southern power base. That is why he had hesitated when two of
his cabinet members -- Newton Baker and Attorney General Thomas W. Gregory --
pressed him shortly before the black editors conference to issue such a
denunciation.[84] But Baker, Creel, Scott and others in his administration
convinced him after the gathering that he needed to do something dramatic to
reach out to the black community so the editors at the conference would not feel
they had been double-crossed. The dilemma was how to reach out without
alienating Southern politicians.
Wilson came up with an ingenious -- although duplicitous -- solution. It
revolved around the fact that on April 4 a mob in Collinsville, Illinois, had
lynched a naturalized German-American named Robert P. Prager whom the mob had
believed was a German sympathizer.[85] The circumstances of the lynching -- a
white victim in a Northern state for the alleged offense of treason -- were so
unusual that it had received wide coverage in the mainstream press. Knowing
that the Prager lynching would be on Americans' minds even three months after it
had occurred, Wilson decided to issue an anti-lynching declaration that omitted
race. Whites would interpret the declaration as a response to a white lynching,
blacks as a response to black lynching, he figured. He was so sure that the
denunciation would please both whites and blacks, without offending either, that
he asked for maximum advance publicity about it.[86] He issued the
declaration on July 26. It was eloquent:
I say plainly that every American who takes part in the action of a mob or
gives it any sort of countenance is no true son of this great democracy,
but its betrayer, and does more to discredit her by that single disloyalty
to her standards of right than the words of her statesmen or the sacrifices
of her heroic boys in the trenches can do to make suffering peoples
believe her to be their savior. How shall we commend democracy to the
acceptance of other peoples if we disgrace our own by proving that it is,
after all, no protection to the weak? . . . I therefore very earnestly and
solemnly beg that the governors of all the states, the law officers of every
community, and, above all, the men and women of every community in the
United States, all who revere America and wish to keep her name without stain
or reproach, will cooperate -- not passively merely, but
actively and watchfully -- to make an end of this disgraceful evil."[87]
The initial reaction of the editors who had attended the conference was
unqualified praise. Not only did their newspapers hail the declaration, but
they identified it as a tangible result of the conference. "President Wilson's
firm stand for law and order ranks with the finest of the great state papers
that have emanated from the White House and it has electrified the entire
country as it has seldom been thrilled before," the Chicago Defender said in a
Page 1 story. The declaration, which grew "directly out of the recent
conference of editors," promised to raise blacks' enthusiasm for the war effort
to new heights, the news story added.[88] In an editorial the Defender
praised Wilson as the first president since Abraham Lincoln "who not only
realized that no country can long survive that makes of one citizen a man, of
the other a vassal, but has had the backbone to publicly denounce this
After it sunk in that Wilson had purposely equivocated on the issue of race in
the anti-lynching declaration, some black papers reined in their initial
exuberance. In an editorial entitled "The president's glancing blow," the
Washington Bee noted that the address's failure to mention race was likely to
prompt "the Negrophobes of Dixie" to contend that "the president had in mind the
lynchers of Germans and other alien enemies."[90] Still, the Bee said, half a
loaf was better than none. "That President Wilson had the courage to hit mob
law in general as he did in his proclamation of last Friday is indeed a source
of much gratification to the loyal, persecuted black millions in the United
States," it said.[91]
The black community's response to the anti-lynching declaration was so
favorable that Wilson followed it up the next month with the reduction of the
10 soldiers' death sentences -- the first time a president had commuted the
death sentences of such a sizable group at one time. Altogether, 29 of the
Houston soldiers had been sentenced to death in two courts-martial in which 45
of their comrades had been convicted of non-capital offenses. The 74
convictions in December of 1917 had angered the black community because the
soldiers went on the rampage only after weeks of harassment from Houston whites,
including police. Blacks' anger turned to fury when the Army hung 13 of the men
in February of 1918 without giving them a chance to appeal. Critics maintained
that the no-appeal provision was supposed to apply only to capital offenses
committed during military action.[92]
The white philanthropist George Foster Peabody told Baker that blacks
considered the hangings nothing but legal lynchings.[93] Since many in the
black community believed that the Houston civilians' harassment had justified
the soldiers' actions, Wilson's commutations in August of the sentences of 10 of
the 16 men who still faced execution were especially welcome. The gesture made
the hangings of the last six men in September a little easier to accept.[94]
The president milked the commutations for all they were worth politically with
African-Americans by including in his commutation message a salute to black
fighting men. "I desire the clemency here ordered to be a recognition of the
splendid loyalty of the race to which these soldiers belong, and an inspiration
to the people of that race to further zeal and service to the country of which
they are citizens and for the liberty of which so many of them are now bravely
bearing arms at the very front of great fields of battle," he said.[95]
Blacks had long resented the fact that whites had never acknowledged the
contributions of black soldiers. A tribute to African-American troops from a
president was momentous, and it was clear from their printed reactions that
Wilson's gesture touched black editors. The president's "acknowledgement of the
fact that 'so many' of our men are 'bravely bearing arms at the very front of
great fields of battle' causes us to think and feel that, after all, that 'world
democracy' for which the Allies are fighting includes the 'black phalanx' over
there in France who are grimly fighting, and heroically dying, and their kinsmen
over here, who are just as patriotically doing their bit at home," the
Washington Bee editorialized.[96]
The commutation of the death sentences, with its praise of black fighting men,
would be the last overture Wilson would make toward blacks, however. He would
have no reason to make another. The war would be over in three months -- on
November 11, 1918 -- and he would no longer need the race's support.[97] It
would be back to business as usual for him: Ignoring the black community,
wishing it would go away.[98] Blacks who had hoped that Wilson was changing
his stripes when he denounced lynching and commuted the soldiers' death
sentences would find themselves disappointed in the waning months of 1918. But
for the 4 1/2 months between the editors' conference and the end of the war, the
president's star was on the rise with the black community.
W.E.B. DuBois's loss of credibility
While Wilson's star was rising, W.E.B. DuBois's was falling. The chain of
events that led to DuBois's credibility being shattered began when Major Joel
Spingarn persuaded DuBois in early June of 1918 to apply for a military
commission so the two could work together again -- this time in the Army's
Military Intelligence Bureau. The intelligence section that Spingarn headed
was tasked with scrutinizing the black community for signs of subversion. It
was one of a number of such sections during the war that watched every major
American ethnic group. A key focus of these sections' efforts was scrutiny of
the ethnic press. An enthusiastic supporter of the U.S. war effort, Spingarn
had lobbied upon entering the Army for a job in intelligence because he felt
that, from that base, he could help blacks make civil rights gains during the
war. He wanted DuBois to help him. So, on June 4, two weeks before the editors
conference, he asked DuBois to apply for a commission.[99]
DuBois went into the editors' conference with an eye toward securing the
commission,[100] which he applied for three days after the gathering, on June
24.[101] The fact that DuBois steered the other editors toward a pledge to
rally readers round the war effort was a factor in the Army's decision to offer
him the commission. Another was the famous "Close Ranks" editorial, which
appeared in the last few days of June in the July-dated edition of the
Crisis.[102] In contrast to the resolution at the editors conference, which
had said that blacks would participate wholeheartedly in the war if specific
grievances were addressed immediately, "Close Ranks" said blacks should hold
their grievances until the war was over:
That which the German power represents today spells death to the
aspirations of Negroes and all darker races for equality, freedom and
democracy. Let us not hesitate. Let us, while this war lasts, forget our
special grievances and close our ranks shoulder to shoulder with our own
white fellow citizens and the allied nations that are fighting for democracy.
We make no ordinary sacrifice, but we make it gladly and willingly with our
eyes lifted to the hills.[103]
The accommodationist editorial from the race's most respected radical stunned
the black community. African-Americans were unable to understand why he would
change his long-held position that there be equality now. Then the news
surfaced in early July that the Army was ready to offer DuBois the commission --
and many blacks' confusion over "Close Ranks" turned to rage.[104] DuBois,
they charged, had written the editorial to curry favor with the Wilson
administration so he could obtain the commission. The fury was so great that in
late July the War Department withdrew the offer of the commission.[105]
DuBois denied selling out, but many blacks never believed him. The loss of
credibility from "Close Ranks" dogged him the rest of his life. It also led to
a splintering of the militant wing of the civil rights movement, with younger
men such as Marcus Garvey and A. Philip Randolph attracting followers DuBois had
had.[106] The splintering prevented the movement from being focused enough in
the 1920s and 1930s to achieve gains for the race, some of DuBois's detractors
said.[107] Viewed from this perspective, the "Close Ranks" affair was not only
a setback for DuBois personally but for the civil rights movement as a whole.
It would not be until after World War II that the movement would galvanize again
around one leader -- Martin Luther King Jr. -- in a way that would lead to
significant progress for the race.
Not only did the July 1918 editors conference play a role in splintering the
civil rights movement, in terms of concrete gains for blacks, it yielded
nothing. The editors had demanded in their Bill of Particulars the passage of a
federal law against lynching, which would have been a formidable weapon in
combating the problem. Instead they got Wilson's denunciation of lynching.
Although this was a moral victory, the president never again denounced lynching,
and the toll from vigilante hangings soared to 70 in 1919. Nor did the black
editors succeed in realizing the other significant civil rights demand in the
Bill of Particulars that applied to blacks in civilian life as opposed to
military life: an end to Jim Crow practices in public transportation.
Although the conference failed to produce concrete civil rights results, it had
an important psychological impact on the editors. The fact that the government
had convened an extraordinary three-day gathering to woo them made them realize
how much clout they had with the black community and how important they were in
shaping black public opinion. That power was so potent that it had forced a
president -- from the South yet -- to reach out to them. Realization that they
had this kind of power made them more determined than ever to be forceful in
leading the charge toward civil rights.
Most of the press not only returned to denouncing injustices with ardor, but
also began exhorting blacks to defend themselves when whites attacked.[108]
Reflecting African-Americans' delight with the new press militancy, circulation
of black publications grew even faster after the war than during the conflict.
"Assessing the new militancy that prevailed in the press, the Justice Department
found a 'dangerous spirit of defiance and vengeance at work among the Negro
leaders, and, to an ever-increasing extent, among their followers . . .'"[109]
That militancy would continue during World War II. Black editors had learned
that cooperating with the government by moderating their denunciations of
injustices during wartime had yielded the race nothing. They would not repeat
that mistake in the next war.[110]
Daniel R. Beaver, Newton D. Baker and the American War Effort 1917-1919
(Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966), 224.
[2] Charles Flint Kellogg, NAACP: A History of the National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press ,1967),
[3] Ibid, 221-27, 260-62.
[4] Ibid,183-7.
[5] Robert L. Jack, History of the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People (Boston: Meador Press,1943), 54.
William Jordan, "'The Damnable Dilemma': African-American Accommodation and
Protest during World War I," Journal of American History (March 1995), 1580.
Mark Ellis, "'Closing Ranks' and 'Seeking Honors': W.E.B. DuBois in World War
I," Journal of American History (June 1992), 108-9, 119-22.
[8] Ibid, 99.
[9] Jordan, "Damnable Dilemma,"1562.
[10] Ellis, "Closing Ranks," 98.
[11] Jane Lang Scheiber and Harry N. Scheiber, "The Wilson Administration and
the Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans, 1917-18,"Labor History (Summer
1967), 458.
[12] Ibid, 458.
[13] Mark Ellis, "America's Black Press, 1914-1918," History Today (September
1991), 20-7.
Theodore Kornweibel Jr., Federal surveillance of Afro-Americans (1917-1925):
The First World War, the Red scare, and the Garvey movement (Frederick, Md.:
University Publications of America, 1985).
[15] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 433-58.
[16] David Levering Lewis, W.E.B. DuBois: Biography of a Race, 1868-1919 (New
York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc., 1993).
[17] Ellis, "America's Black Press," 26.
Jean Lange Folkerts, "Robert S. Abbott," Dictionary of Literary Biography:
American Newspaper Journalists, 1926-1950 (Detroit: Gale Research, 1990), 15;
Theodore Kornweibel Jr., "'The most dangerous of all Negro journals': Federal
Efforts to Suppress the Chicago Defender During World War I," American
Journalism (Spring 1994), 163.
[19] The Justice Department issued a report on October, 1919, on the threat to
public order from what it considered radical publications. The section on the
black press, "Radicalism and Sedition Among the Negroes as Reflected in Their
Publications," mentioned how articulate many black editors were. The citation
on the report's reference to the black press: "Investigation Activities of the
Department of Justice," 66th Congress, 1st Session, Senate Document XII (May
19-November 19, 1919), 161-187.
[20] "Secretary Baker's Letter," Washington Bee (22 December 1917), 4.
(Italics included.)
Ellis, "America's Black Press," 24.
[22] Ibid, 20.
[23] Ibid, 22.
[24] Beaver, Newton D. Baker, 224.
[25] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 434.
[26] Ibid, 434-5.
[27] Jack, History of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People, 47-50; Kellogg, NAACP: A History, 199-205.
"Hobson is right," Washington Bee (11 August 1917), 4.
[29] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 441.
Emmett J. Scott, The American Negro in the World War (Chicago: Emmett J.
Scott,1919), 101-2, 429-30.
[31] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 450.
[32] Ibid, 439-40.
[33] The race question was blacks' demand for equality.
[34] "Secretary Baker's Letter," 4.
[35] Ellis, "America's Black Press," 25.
Kornweibel, "The most dangerous", 155-58.
[37] Ellis, "America's Black Press, 26.
[38] Ibid.
[39] Beaver, Newton D. Baker, 229.
Ellis, "Closing Ranks,"102.
[41] Lewis, W.E.B. DuBois: Biography, 552.
[42] Ellis, "Closing Ranks," 108.
[43] Ellis, "America's Black Press," 24.
[44] Scott's task in his War Department job was to make the enlistment,
training and deployment of black troops as smooth as possible. The former
secretary of Booker T. Washington visited U.S. bases where blacks were
stationed, investigated charges of mistreatment of black troops, and took action
under Baker's auspices against draft boards in the South that discriminated
against black registrants. The overarching goal of his efforts was to ensure
black soldiers' support of the war. It was an important task, given that
367,000 African-Americans would be in uniform before the war was over, 13
percent of the strength of U.S. forces.
[45] Ellis, "America's Black Press," 24.
"Colored Editors,"Washington Bee (6 July 1918), 1.
[47] Beaver, Newton D. Baker, 224.
[48] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 451.
[49] Henry Blumenthal, "Woodrow Wilson and the Race Question," Journal of
Negro History (January 1963), 1-22.
Ellis, "America's Black Press," 23.
[51] The examples are a few of the hundreds that appeared in The Washington Bee
in the 18 months after the United States declared war on Germany in April of
[52] Jordan, "'Damnable Dilemma," 1576.
[53] The Washington Bee , for example, ran several such stories between 1916
and 1918.
Ray Stannard Baker,Woodrow Wilson: Life & Letters. Armistice. March
1-November 11, 1918. (New York: Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., 1939),
[55] Lewis,W.E.B. DuBois: Biography, 511-12.
[56] Ibid, 554.
[57] "Colored Editors,"1.
[58] Harry Amana, "A. Philip Randolph,"Dictionary of Literary Biography:
American Magazine Journalists, 1900-1960 (Detroit: Gale Research, 1990), 272,
Ellis, "America's Black Press," 24.
[60] "Colored Editors," 1.
[61] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 450.
[63] Elliott M. Rudwick,W.E.B. DuBois: A Study in Minority Group Leadership
(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1960), 203.
[64] "Address to the Committee on Public Information," Records of the Military
Intelligence Division, National Archives, Records Group 165, File 10218-154, 21
June 1918.
[66] Ibid.
[67] "Bill of Particulars to Be Submitted Privately to Bureau Heads in
Washington," Records of the Military Intelligence Division, National Archives,
Records Group 165, File 10218-154, 21 June 1918.
[68] Kellogg, NAACP: A History , 260-62.
"Bill of Particulars, 21 June 1918.
[70] Ibid.
[71] Ibid.
[72] Ibid.
Ellis, "America's Black Press," 25.
[74] Ibid.
[75] Jordan, "Damnable Dilemma,"1576.
[76] Ellis, "America's Black Press," 25.
[77] "The Conference of Colored Men,"Washington Bee (13 July 1918), 4.
[78] Ellis, "America's Black Press," 26.
Scott,The American Negro in the War, 284-99.
[80] The Washington Dee was among the black newspapers that published all of
Tyler's stories from France.
[81] Scott,The American Negro in the War, 448-51.
[82] Kellogg, NAACP: A History,258.
Jack, History of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People, 30-46.
[84] Ibid, 456-57.
[85] Baker,Woodrow Wilson: Life & Letters, 72.
[86] Ibid, 289.
"Mob action,"Washington Bee, 3 August 1918, 1.
[88] "Editors Conference Yields Big Results," Chicago Defender, 3 August 1918,
[89] "Our President Has Spoken," Chicago Defender, 3 August 1918, 6.
"The President's Glancing Blow,"Washington Bee, 3 August 1918, 4.
[91] Ibid.
[92] Kellogg, NAACP: A History , 260-2.
[93] Beaver, Newton D. Baker, 228-9.
[94] Kellogg, NAACP: A History, 260-2.
"Inchin' Along," Washington Bee (14 September 1918), 4.
[96] Ibid.
[97] Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 450.
[98] Kellogg, NAACP: A History , 155-82.
Lewis, W.E.B. DuBois: Biography, 552.
[100] DuBois secretly took a military physical on June 15, four days before the
editors conference started, according to David Levering Lewis on Page 555 of
W.E.B. DuBois: Biography of a Race, 1868-1919.
[101] Ellis, "Closing Ranks,"108.
[102] Ibid, 108-9.
W.E.B. DuBois, "Close Ranks," Crisis, July 1918, 111.
[104] Rudwick,W.E.B. DuBois: A Study, 203-4.
[105] Lewis,W.E.B. DuBois: Biography, 560.
[106] Jordan, "'Damnable Dilemma," 1583.
[107] Ellis, "Closing Ranks,"120-22.
Scheiber and Scheiber, "Wartime Mobilization of Black Americans," 458.
[109] Ibid.
[110] Ellis, "Closing Ranks," 123.
Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main AEJMC Page


text:
Sisters and brothers in Christ, there are alleged claims that Pastor Ronald Harris, Sr. who was gunned down while preaching was having an affair with the deacon's wife. Then, there is an alleged claim that Woodrow Karey (shooter), wife filed a police report, accusing him of rape, which may not be true. Now, it's still very bad Woodrow Karey Jr. did not have respect for God and murdered this man in front of his congregation.
According to wistv.com, "Mr. Karey stated that he had received some inappropriate text messages from his wife to the pastor," Mancuso said. What a shame, sometimes this wife could be partially the blame for what happened. She possible only filed a police report, claiming rape, because she did not want her husband to hurt Pastor Harris. So said to admit, it's too late.
Saints of God, this is a very sad situation, because allegedly Pastor Harris and Woodrow Karey were good friends. Aren't those the ones who hurt you the most, sometimes? However, there is never an excuse for ignoring God's Word that clearly tells us not to kill (Exodus 20:13).
Watch Video
wistv.com - Columbia, South Carolina |
Allegations of a sexual relationship being investigated in death of pastor
By Gerron Jordan
CALCASIEU PARISH, LA (KPLC) -Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Tony Mancuso said the wife of the man accused of shooting Pastor Ronald J. Harris Sr. filed a rape complaint against Harris on Wednesday, two days before he was gunned down at the Tabernacle of Praise Worship Center in Lake Charles.
"Mr. Karey stated that he had received some inappropriate text messages from his wife to...Read full article, here.
Source and Photo: WISTV.com

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The Top 10 Highest Paid Music Artists In The World
Jan 31, 2016
Forbes has just put out the list for highest paid musicians for 2015. These music artists have created some very catchy yet inspiring songs this...
The Top 50 Highest Paid Celebrities of 2015
Jan 23, 2016
Forbes ranked the most successful celebrities of 2015! The list is quite stunning! From movie actors and actresses to pro athletes, this list has definitely...
The World's Top 50 Highest Paid Athletes This Year
Jan 21, 2016
Forbes just released the list of top paid athletes in the world. This is an astonishing list of amazing athletes. There are many future hall...
5 Snapchat Hacks You Should Be Using
Feb 17, 2015
I am hot on this platform right now, you guys. And you should be too. It's a huge deal, and has lots of amazing...
Why YOU Should Be Using Twitter's Awesome New Video Feature
Feb 12, 2015
This past week, I have spent several hours using the new Twitter video feature. But probably not in the way you think. I was responding to...
Why Paulo Coelho's Book 'The Alchemist' Sold over 150 Million Copies
Feb 5, 2015
Brazilian born lyricist and novelist, Paulo Coelho celebrates the 25th anniversary of his best selling book 'The Alchemist'. The Alchemist has sold over 150 million...
Today's Anniversary of Jack Canfield's Classic The Success Principles PLUS Free Gifts
Jan 28, 2015
Jack Canfield is an award-winning speaker, bestselling author, entrepreneur, trainer and an internationally recognized leader in personal development and peak performance strategies. Jack Canfield holds...
Pencils of Promise Launch New Initiative PASSPORT Today
Jan 28, 2015
It's no secret highly successful individuals love giving back and helping make the world a better place. However, the misconception is that most of...
5 Must-Read Personal Development Books From 2014
Jan 27, 2015
Whether you read a book a week or only a few a year, these five beauties, have to be at the top of your...
The Top 13 Most Expensive Homes In The World
Nov 30, 2014
From the Ambani's in India to the Villa Leopolda in France, we share with you a nifty little infographic courtesy of DoMyOwnHomeLoan that covers the...
The Top 20 Highest Paid Athlete's Of 2014
Oct 5, 2014
This last year has been a very prosperous one for some of the worlds top athletes. Some have cashed in hard through endorsements and...
Why Kobe Bryant's Work Ethic Is So Untouchable
Jul 24, 2014
An athletic trainer by the name of Rob recently left a story on reddit about his encounter with Kobe Bryant during their midnight training...
6 Reasons Why Lebron James Letter is Actually a Success Manifesto
Jul 14, 2014
I've been there through it all. Anyone who knows me in the slightest knows that I'm a die-hard heat fan. Besides perhaps Blue's Clues or...
(Video) Why Elon Musk Is Such A Rockstar Entrepreneur
Jun 30, 2014
Billionaire Entrepreneur and space age innovator "Elon Musk" is a true visionary ... he is freeing mankind of both dependence on fossil fuels and...
Timothy Sykes Gives You A Tour Of His $15,000 A Night Hotel In Bora Bora
Jun 24, 2014
Multi-Millionaire Stock Trader & Internet Entrepreneur "Timothy Sykes" takes the Addicted2Success viewers on an exclusive tour of his $15,000 a night hotel stay in...
(Infographic) The Top 8 Digital Media Influencers Under 30
Jun 9, 2014
This infographic looks at the top digital media influencers under the age of 30 in the digital world right now. These are young men and...
Dr.Dre Confirms That Apple Is Looking At Acquiring Beats Electronics for $3.2 Billion
May 10, 2014
Dr.Dre has confirmed that Apple is looking at purchasing his Beats Electronics line for $3.2 Billion, which will be the highest acquisition ever for Apple. Apple's...
10 Underdog Brands That Became Very Successful
Jan 26, 2014
I don't know about you, but I love hearing the kind of stories where an underdog in the business world has managed to take...
The Top 10 UK Entrepreneurs
Jan 12, 2014
The United Kingdom has long been a hotbed of entrepreneurial activity, and hundreds of thousands of people in Britain have achieved financial independence by...
(Video) Drake Explains Why He Is Addicted To Success
Dec 29, 2013
Award winning Rapper and Actor, Aubrey "Drake" Graham recently shared his insight on becoming successful and what it takes to be a high achiever...
10 Reasons Why 50 Cent Is Such A Highly Successful Entrepreneur
Dec 21, 2013
50, exploded into the music industry in 2002 with a bullet proof vest and a whole lot of courage. Since then, he has become...
Lorna Jane's Amazing Story of Success
Oct 7, 2013
Lorna Jane is one of Australia's biggest success stories and nowadays this successful female entrepreneur is crossing the ocean and offering her fashion products...
(Video) Apple's Process of Creative Innovation
Sep 17, 2013
This beautifully designed video by Apple is an inspiring explanation of how they are able to succeed in the area of creative innovation. Apple has...
A Young Mans Daring Journey To Become A Millionaire
Aug 17, 2013
A 24 year old young and aspiring entrepreneur, "Corey Wadden" from Toronto, Ontario has a very daring and inspiring objective; to make one million...
The Top 13 Highest Paid DJ's of 2013
Aug 17, 2013
Want to know the net worth of your favorite DJ? Well Forbes just released the Net Worth earnings of the Top 13 Highest Earning...
The School Teacher Who Quit His Job To Become A Ninja – 6 Steps To Turn Your Dreams Into Reality
Aug 15, 2013
Izmael Arkin, a middle school teacher quit his job to follow his childhood dream: To become a Ninja. Read on to see how Izmael...
The Top 10 Richest Models Of All Time
Jul 19, 2013
As Linda Evangelista once said, "We don't wake up for less than $10,000 a day", the fashion world is a modern-day gold bullion. This...
Michael Jordan Is Now Selling His Illinois Mansion For $21 Million – Check It Out
Jul 3, 2013
Michael Jordan, one of the greatest basketball players of all time is now selling his 7 acre Highland Park IL mansion for $21 Million...
Two New Investors Will Appear On ABC's "Shark Tank" This Coming Season
Jul 1, 2013
Two new self made billionaire investors will be appearing in ABC's 5th Season of Shark Tank. One is into films and sports and the...
10 Hip Hop Artists Who Successfully Became Entrepreneurs
Jun 27, 2013
Todays hip hop artists may be known better for their entrepreneurship than for their platinum recordings. A number of rappers have branched out and...
Page 1 of 4
How I Made Multi-Millions Before The Age Of 30 – Annie Lawless
Apr 1, 2016
I recently caught up with the amazing Annie Lawless to talk about how she achieved such a high level of success at such a...
How Real Entrepreneurs Roll – Gary Vaynerchuk
Apr 1, 2016
6 Fundamentals Every Entrepreneur Can Master – Andrew Griffiths
Jan 21, 2016
How an Ordinary Person Can Create Extraordinary Change Now! – Adam Braun
Dec 9, 2015
What It Takes To Be a Network Marketing Legend – Anthony Powell
Dec 7, 2015
18 Inspirational Jessica Alba Quotes
Jul 26, 2017
The 3 Elements of Persuasion You Need to Know
Jul 25, 2017
The Day I Decided To Stop Being A Loser And How You Can Do The Same
Jul 25, 2017
Success Advice
Copyright © 2016 Addicted2Success.com


text:
July 26, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.
Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.
The Common Enemy
Posted on Feb 7, 2008
A nightmarish vision of a McCain-Huckabee ticket haunted me as the votes came in on Super Tuesday night.
Square, Story page, 2nd paragraph, mobile
The next morning, a closer examination of the exit polls cheered me up. Improving on a trend that was evident in his South Carolina primary victory, Barack Obama increased his share of the white vote, confounding skeptics who have maintained whites won't vote for an African-American. As Gary Langer of ABC News noted, "Obama won white men in five of the 16 states where exit polls were conducted." In California, white men favored Obama over Sen. Hillary Clinton 52 percent to 34 percent.
This was the best news of a night when Clinton and Obama battled to a tie that will extend their struggle to future state contests, perhaps all the way to the Democratic National Convention. Is it possible the country is moving beyond the racial divide, with younger voters no longer trapped by the prejudices of the past?
After Super Tuesday, Democrats worried that a long Clinton-Obama contest might irreparably damage the party's prospects in November. Actually, the bigger threat is McCain winning the GOP nomination—as appears almost certain now with the exit of Mitt Romney—especially if the Arizona senator decides to appease the Republican right by choosing Huckabee as his running mate.
Square, Site wide, Desktop
Square, Site wide, Mobile
As Huckabee said on "Fox and Friends" Wednesday: "You cannot win as a Republican if you don't carry [the South]. You just can't." As for the vice presidency, he said on NBC's "Today" show: "Let's go ahead and be honest now. Nobody ever wants the vice president's job. Nobody ever turns it down."
To understand the danger posed by such a combo, you must first attempt, for the sake of argument, to briefly put aside their outrageous opinions. I know it is hard to forget McCain's support of the surge in Iraq and his willingness to keep troops there for a century. Or to forget Huckabee's view of amending the Constitution: "I believe it is a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God. And that's what we need to do, is to amend the Constitution so that it fits God's standards."
What is dangerous about Huckabee is that he is a good campaigner with the manner of what he once was—the minister of a Baptist church with a friendly, humorous way of speaking developed over years of sermonizing, counseling troubled couples and leading youth groups. Don't be misled by his limited appeal to his Southern region and the Christian right. The man is easy to underestimate.
McCain shouldn't be underestimated either, although many—including some prominent journalists and pundits—did when his campaign almost fell apart last summer. He's got a great biography, and he deals with critics in his audiences in a forthright and winning way. I witnessed that one night in Iowa when he spoke to a Christian right group. One man, a thorough know-it-all, blasted McCain for believing in global warming. McCain listened politely and then disarmingly said maybe you're right. But maybe you're not. Isn't it smart to do the research and make preparations in case you're not? All through the audience, I saw people nodding approvingly at the answer.
And polls indicate he would be a tough opponent. In California, considered safe for Democrats, the Field Poll, taken Feb. 3, showed Hillary Clinton beating him by just 45 per cent to 43 per cent and Obama leading him 47 percent to 40 percent.
With the right campaign smarts on the Democrats' side, either Clinton or Obama should be able to beat McCain, with or without Huckabee on his ticket.
The issues are clearly with the Democrats.
The economy is plummeting, dragged down by the enormous debt being run up to finance the war. Hopefully, the Democrats will be able to make the connection in a stronger manner than they have done so far.
The Democrats are not fractured by huge ideological divisions. Both Clinton and Obama want out of Iraq, although she favors too slow a pullout. They disagree over health care, but it is somewhat of a wonkish dispute over whether everyone should be forced to have insurance.
Most important, together they can pull together a Democratic coalition that cuts across racial and economic class lines. Clinton won white women, Obama won white men. Latinos backed her, blacks supported him. They'll fight hard but hopefully without damaging each other or themselves. The pre-Super Tuesday campaigning was actually pretty peaceful and collegial. If you want to see ugliness, go back to 1968 and 1972 when the Vietnam War tore the Democratic Party apart. I hope Clinton and Obama are smart enough to avoid having that happen again.
Banner, End of Story, Desktop
Banner, End of Story, Mobile
Watch a selection of Wibbitz videos based on Truthdig stories:
Related Entries
New and Improved Comments
If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.
Join the conversation
Load Comments
By Kathryn, February 8, 2008 at 10:02 am Link to this comment
The soultion to end gobal warming, is to stop erotic sex, which heats up the bodies, which heats up the earth, which heats up the Creator's Temper. Which causes Gobal Warming. This is the most economical and common sense way of dealing with this catastrophe. Wake up people sexual ungodliness will
By Cosmick, February 8, 2008 at 9:59 am Link to this comment
Moving beyond racial divide but what about the sexist divide?
Is it possible the country is moving beyond the racial divide, with younger voters no longer trapped by the prejudices of the past?
The question should ask "Is it ............., with younger(white)voters no longer trapped by the prejudices of the past? Yes, it appears that white voters are moving beyond the racial divide but what are the Africian American voters doing in this regard?
By Vash the Stampede, February 8, 2008 at 8:45 am Link to this comment
Yes, it is easy to dismiss Huckabee's view of creationism because he doesn't believe in evolution - something totally different than the big bang you're talking about. Apples and oranges because guess what…evolution is a fact and anybody who denies it doesn't understand science and shouldn't be president.
Also, it gives me hope that you say Obama is an atheist. I might have someone to vote for after all.
By a HUMAN BEING, February 8, 2008 at 8:04 am Link to this comment
I'm always amazed at how you guys always want to blame the people for what has happened in America. We've been taken down a path, we didn't choose this for each other, we've been guided down a path of destruction by the same coorporations and media outlets that trying to decide this election for us. We have little control and the minute we start assembling together under our own banner spells trouble for the "establishment" which then will do anything, even kill another to protect their illusion of power. Instead of blaming the people for not protecting ourselves stand behind the ONE person (OBAMA) who has come along to bring us together under one nation in the name of change and justice. But, you guys don't want that. That only means you will have to give up "yourselves" for the greater good of helping the us all…and we all know how "hard" it is to give up our selfish desires to do for another. Run around with this yapping all you guys want, but if you want change then let's get together under one name. OBAMA for PRESIDENT! Enough of these selfish politicians. OBAMA is not a politician, he is a LEADER. The funy thing is the ones who claim Obama is like the others are either in denial or evil themselves…
By Ron, February 8, 2008 at 6:36 am Link to this comment
The end IS coming and homosexuality IS as an abomintation. Didn't you get the memo from James Dobson?
By Ron, February 8, 2008 at 6:32 am Link to this comment
"If you want to see ugliness, go back to 1968 and 1972 when the Vietnam War tore the Democratic Party apart."
That's the problem, we live in a mindless society with airhead mentalities, a generation of illiterates who can't read without moving their lips, who can quote the Bible even though they've never read it ("I know it's in there somewhere!") They have never heard that "those who don't learn from their history are destined to repeat it."
By Ron, February 8, 2008 at 6:23 am Link to this comment
Your mouth to God's ear.
By Ron, February 8, 2008 at 6:10 am Link to this comment
Wait a minute! Are we electing a president or a pope? We are thisclose to a theocracy. Somebody do something!
By Ron, February 8, 2008 at 6:01 am Link to this comment
Worry not! With the support of that notorious bigot, homophobe, and antichrist candidate James Dobson, I think we can just sit back and watch Huckabee self-destruct. America has had enough of the fanatical right wing who gave us Bush and Cheney. Watch for it!
By hettie, February 8, 2008 at 4:26 am Link to this comment
I think Hillary is smart enough not to trash the Democrats' chances. Unfortunately, Obama and his backers are not. They are the most ruthless bunch since Reagan and his kitchen cabinet. If he wins the nomination, I will not vote for him, even though he says I will.
By KYJUrisDoctor, February 7, 2008 at 7:36 pm Link to this comment
GREAT speech by John McCain.
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide


text:
In the first quarter some 9.1 million U.S. residential properties were seriously underwater — where the combined loan amount secured by the property is at least 25 percent higher than the property's estimated market value — representing 17 percent of all properties with a mortgage.
That's the lowest level since RealtyTrac began reporting negative equity in the first quarter of 2012. In the fourth quarter of 2013, 9.3 million residential properties representing 19 percent of all properties with a mortgage were seriously underwater, and in the first quarter of 2013 10.9 million residential properties representing 26 percent of all properties with a mortgage were seriously underwater. The recent peak in negative equity was the second quarter of 2012, when 12.8 million U.S. residential properties representing 29 percent of all properties with a mortgage were seriously underwater.
"U.S. homeowners are continuing to recover equity lost during the Great Recession, but the pace of that recovering equity slowed in the first quarter, corresponding to slowing home price appreciation," said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. "Slower price appreciation means the 9 million homeowners seriously underwater could still have a long road back to positive equity.
"The relatively high percentage of foreclosures with equity is surprising to many because it would seem homeowners with equity could easily avoid foreclosure by leveraging that equity by refinancing or with an equity sale of the home," Blomquist noted. "But many distressed homeowners with equity may not realize they have equity and in some cases have vacated the property already, assuming that foreclosure is inevitable."
The universe of equity-rich properties — those with at least 50 percent equity — grew to 9.9 million representing 19 percent of all properties with a mortgage in the first quarter, up from 9.1 million representing 18 percent of all properties with a mortgage in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Another 8.5 million properties were on the verge of resurfacing in the first quarter, with between 10 percent negative equity and 10 percent positive equity. This segment represented 16 percent of all properties with a mortgage in the first quarter. That was compared to 8.3 million properties representing 17 percent of all properties with a mortgage in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Fewer distressed properties had negative equity in the first quarter, with 45 percent of all properties in the foreclosure process seriously underwater — down from 48 percent in the fourth quarter of 2013 and down from 58 percent in the first quarter of 2013. Conversely, the share of foreclosures with positive equity increased to 35 percent in the first quarter, up from 31 percent in the fourth quarter and up from 24 percent in the third quarter of 2013.
Markets with most negative equity
States with the highest percentage of residential properties seriously underwater in the first quarter were Nevada (34 percent), Florida (31 percent), Illinois (30 percent), Michigan (29 percent), and Ohio (27 percent).
Major metropolitan statistical areas (population 500,000 or more) with the highest percentage of residential properties seriously underwater were Las Vegas (37 percent), Lakeland, Fla., (36 percent), Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Fla., (35 percent), Cleveland (35 percent), Akron, Ohio (34 percent), and Detroit (33 percent).
Markets with most resurfacing equity
Major metro areas with the highest percentage of resurfacing equity — between negative 10 percent and positive 10 percent — were Louisville, Ky., (37 percent), Columbia, S.C. (28 percent), Colorado Springs, Colo., (28 percent), Little Rock, Ark., (28 percent), and Tulsa, Okla., (27 percent).
"Homeowners are no longer underwater on their homes like they were at the peak of 2012," said Sheldon Detrick, CEO of Prudential Detrick/Alliance Realty, covering the Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Okla., markets. "Low housing inventory and more buyers are causing home prices to rise and sell over list price, giving homeowners who are moderately underwater a chance to avoid the foreclosure process."
Markets with most equity-rich properties
Major metro areas with the highest percentage of equity rich properties — those with at least 50 percent equity — were San Jose, Calif., (39 percent), Honolulu (35 percent), San Francisco (35 percent), Poughkeepsie, N.Y., (34 percent), and Los Angeles (32 percent).
Markets with most positive-equity foreclosures
Major metro areas with more than 50 percent of properties in foreclosure with equity included Denver (64 percent), Boston (58 percent), Minneapolis (58 percent), Houston (54 percent), and Washington, D.C. (52 percent).
Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Home Equity & Underwater report provides counts of residential properties based on several categories of equity — or loan to value (LTV) — at the state, metro and county level, along with the percentage of total residential properties with a mortgage that each equity category represents. The equity/LTV calculation is derived from a combination of record-level open loan data and record-level estimated property value data, and is also matched against record-level foreclosure data to determine foreclosure status for each equity/LTV category.
Deeply underwater: Loan to value ratio of 125 percent or above, meaning the homeowner owed at least 25 percent more than the estimated market value of the property.
Equity Rich: Loan to value ratio of 50 percent or lower, meaning the homeowner had at least 50 percent equity.
Foreclosures w/Equity: Properties in some stage of the foreclosure process (default or scheduled for auction, not including bank-owned) where the loan to value ratio was 100 percent or lower.


text:
Whitfield County Detention Center
Position and Rank Structure:
- Intake / Release = Lieutenant
- Housing / Laundry = Lieutenant
- Shift Supervisor = Sergeant
The Detention Facility is a four story, 146,000 sq ft., 540 bed facility open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The Detention Facility houses persons arrested by area Law Enforcement Agencies, which include the Whitfield County Sheriffs Office, Dalton Police Department, Tunnel Hill Police Department, Cohutta Police Department, Varnell Police Department, Georgia State Patrol, G.B.I., F.B.I. and the Local Office of the I.N.S.
The Detention Facility operates 12 hour shifts, work one week 80 hours and off one week. There is a total of 9 Sergeants in the Detention Facility; a Sergeant is assigned to supervise a particular section in the Detention Facility. The ninth Sergeant is a person who has to be very versatile because it is their duty to become the shift supervisor when the regular shift supervisors are on holiday, vacation, sick or away at training.
There are a total of 81 staff members this includes, nurses, food service, detention staff, inmate work supervisors, central control staff, commissary staff and administrative staff.
The Detention Facility maintains an outside public service work crew. The work crew keeps most of the local cemeteries mowed during the summer, and at other times they clean litter from the county road right a ways. Case law does not permit this crew to work on any properties, which are privately owned.
The Correctional Center also maintains its own medical staff consisting of two nurses and a physician assistant who stays in contact with the physician on a daily basis, with visits from the physician on a weekly basis. Sick call is held daily and the staff will see and treat approximately 200 inmates per month.
The Correctional Center serves 3 meals a day to an average of 400 inmates, which totals to 1200 meals per day, 438,000 meals per year. Three full time cooks who are assisted by selected trustees from the facility prepare these meals. During the course of a regular day the morning meal (breakfast) and the noon meal (Lunch) are served hot with the evening meal is called a cold meal because it consists of sandwiches and desert. All menus meet or exceed all of the daily requirements of calorie intake and special meals are provided upon request for persons with medical conditions or religious preference.
Also falling under the supervision of the Detention Facility is the Central Control Section. In this area is where the public goes to obtain information about any family members who are incarcerated, to get approval for bonds, answering and directing all phone calls coming into the Sheriff's Office, controlling the security of the Detention Facility by maintaining the control panels which allows persons thru all secured doors in the facility, operations of the Georgia Crime Information Center / National Crime Information Center and to greet the public and to help them in anyway possible.
Central Control consists of eight staff members and one Sergeant and all work random shifts and hours.
Persons interested in employment opportunities should know:
Benefits include: Retirement plan, vacation, holidays, and sick leave. Medical insurance is available for employees and for dependents at a reasonable price. Other insurance's available: Dental, Life, disability, etc.
Applications can be completed at the Board of Commissioners Office located at the Courthouse annex at 301 W Crawford St. Applications can also be completed online at the Whitfield County Website. Click on Employment Opportunities and follow the directions.
Other interesting web sites:
National Institute of Corrections


text:
Chevrolet Repair Questions? Ask a Chevy Mechanic for Answers ASAP
The first thing you will notice is probably the "Check Engine" light. Flex fuel is an Oxygenate, which means it actually has oxygen molecules in it. This will make the engine run lean, causing a P0171 and/or P0174 fault code (assuming its an OBD II vehicle). Once the tank is run dry and regular fuel put back in, this will clear itself up.
Other effects is possibly a clogged fuel filter, since "Flex Fuel" is 85% alcohol and will usually remove varnish buildup from inside the tank and lines, which may clog the fuel filter. may want to replace it (if you have one) once the tank runs out.
Long term effects (of prolonged use) is degredation of the fuel system. Alcohol is corrosive and Flex Fuel systems use special O-rings and other components to resist this type of corrosion.
Long story short, run the tank out, fill up with regular gas and don't do it again! Hope this helps.


text:
15 result(s) displayed (91 - 105 of 148):
|You can choose whichever platitude makes you happy: Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Cutting off your nose to spite your face. They all apply to the Elton Brand trade rumors we've all been hearing. After the jump I'll give you my take on the situation.
|In the first half, the Sixers turned the ball over 14 times. They allowed Houston to grab 9 offensive rebounds, a rate of 33%. Thad Young grabbed two rebounds the entire half. The Sixers were held to 18 points in the second quarter. It was almost an unwatchable half of basketball. The only highlights came from Elton Brand, who blocked 6 shots. How, you may ask, did a start like that turn into the biggest win of the season (thus far)? Check after the jump for the answer.
|It's funny, to find out how the Sixers are playing a casual fan doesn't have to watch the games, check the box scores, listen to the WIP or read the Inquirer. All he' has to do is check the comments section right here. If the Sixers are playing well, the conversation will veer toward under-appreciated players, smart coaching moves and playoff seeding. If they're playing poorly, it's mostly trade rumors and no one is safe.
|Now that Elton Brand is back on the floor, I feel we're running out of time to state our case against Willie Green staying in the starting lineup when EB is ready to go 30 minutes per. This post will be short on words, heavy on stats. After the jump you'll find what I believe is an extremely compelling argument for burying Green on the end of the bench and running with a starting lineup of Sam, EB, Thad, Iggy and Miller.
Latest comment: from chrisGreat analysis, and I can conclude only one thing: the man has pictures....
|Kate Fagan has a pair of articles on Elton Brand today in the Inquirer that I'd like to take a look at and get your feelings on.
Latest comment: from JoeYeah Redd would never be on my wish list....
|If you're going to pick one area of the game to be horrible at against the Knicks, three-point defense is probably the only one that could kill you. The Sixers played with fire tonight and nearly lost a home game they absolutely couldn't afford to lose.
|Elton Brand's suit will be hanging in his locker at 7p.m. when the Knicks and Sixers tip it off at the Wach. After the jump we'll talk about Brand's return and take a quick look at the stats.
|Part three of our first half review will feature the most hotly-debated players on the team. When Elton Brand returns, this group should see a big shakedown in minute distribution. It's anyone's guess as to how that will affect the production of these guys. After the jump, we'll take a look at the splits for the Sixers' power forwards and centers, see who's been a second-half warrior in the past and make the case for more minutes for a certain rook.
|Tom Moore has the scoop. After practice today, coach DiLeo talked about his plan for assimilating Brand back into the rotation and style of the team.
|There's a deadline looming. Strike that. Instead, I'm going to look at this as the beginning. A fresh start to do this the right way. Of course, I'm talking about Elton Brand's return to the Sixers' lineup, which will probably happen either Friday or Saturday night. After the jump I'll give my plan for working him back into the rotation and back into the flow of the team.
|The AP has a quick hit on Elton Brand's recovery. He says everything is going according to schedule and he should be back in two weeks. He'll start practicing with the team next week.
Latest comment: from Terry HarbaterThis is my 2nd browse on your website. Regards for not flipping me down....
|Let's assume Elton Brand really will be out for only a month. What will the team do without him? What should they do? What will this season look like when he comes back? After the jump we'll try our best...
|Elton Brand will miss one month with a fracture and a tear in his right shoulder, no surgery will be performed. To me, one month sounds overly-optimistic, but let's go with that number for now. I'll be back a little later with analysis of the news.
|I just received an e-mail from someone in the Sixers organization a couple of minutes ago. Elton Brand will have an MRI tonight, results probably tomorrow. I'm going to interject my own personal history with this injury. I'm not a doctor, this is just my experience with a dislocated shoulder.
|If you haven't heard, the Sixers were dealt a potentially deadly blow in the third quarter tonight. Elton Brand went down with a dislocated shoulder. I'll have more on that later, for now, let's talk about this come-from-behind win and how the bench carried the Sixers to the win.


text:
The British number one returned after three months out last week but has lost two of three matches since.
He suffered a 6-1 6-2 loss to Marcos Baghdatis in Cincinnati on Tuesday.
A statement on Murray's website said: "He isn't ready to play. Instead, he'll keep working hard and hopes to be ready for the US Open."
The 20-year-old Scot has been unwilling to hit his forehand at full power since returning in Washington last week, but said after his defeat by Baghdatis: "I haven't had any bad reactions.
"It was feeling better, and I guess it's pretty much 100% now. It's a good sign."
The US Open gets under way on 27 August.
What are these?


text:
Focus: Hormel's acquisition of Skippy
By Katy Askew | 4 January 2013
Hormel plans to take Skippy "out of the jar"
The sale of Unilever's Skippy business was confirmed yesterday (3 January) when it was announced that the iconic peanut butter brand would find a new home with Hormel Foods. While Hormel clearly has big plans for Skippy, Unilever will be hoping that an increased focus will benefit its food portfolio. In part one of our two-part analysis, Katy Askew looks at how Hormel hopes the deal will benefit its bottom line.
Unveiling its US$700m acquisition of Skippy from Unilever, Hormel Foods was in an upbeat mood. According to management, the deal - which was primarily funded through cash-on-hand and carries a number of tax benefits - will be "modestly accretive" to EPS this financial year and add $0.13-$0.17 in fiscal 2014.
At first glance, a mainstream brand like Skippy operating in a category with high household penetration is not an obvious fit for Hormel, which tends to be more of a niche player in high-growth sectors. However, speaking to analysts during a conference call, CEO Jeff Ettinger insisted that Skippy was a good fit for Hormel.
"I do feel very confident, given the breadth of the portfolio ... there is no reason why Skippy can't fit in with the rest of our business," Ettinger commented yesterday morning.
Indeed, the acquisition of Skippy carries a number of benefits in terms of Hormel's product mix. Hormel has long talked of the need to find a balance between its packaged foods and protein businesses and the Skippy acquisition significantly increases Hormel's exposure to the packaged foods area. Upon completion, the contribution of Hormel's grocery segment will rise from 24% to 33% of projected 2014 profits.
While Skippy is heavily exposed to the swings of peanut butter prices, which recently spiked but are now on a downward trajectory following improved harvests, CFO Jody Feragen told analysts that Hormel views this in a positive light.
"We see that as a plus from our balanced model standpoint. As we get into crops beyond the feed costs we think that could be a good balancing point," she revealed.
Margins at the group's Jennie-O turkey and Dinty Moore stew units have been hit by drought in the US, which has caused animal protein prices to jump following a spike in corn and soyabean feed costs. However, as this side of the commodities see-saw rises, peanut butter costs have gone down and by broadening its exposure to commodity costs Hormel hopes it will be able to offset some of the more extreme swings in its cost base.
As Janney analyst Jonathan Feeney observes: "Management has made a very smart move in diversifying away from its animal protein core at a time when margins are likely to correct downward. This deal plugs that gap. We expect peanut butter volumes to rebound from their weak 2012 levels (-3.2%) as pricing follows peanut costs lower."
Skippy's appeal goes beyond the immediate impact it will have on Hormel's portfolio and the group has bigger plans for the brand that could well see its contribution to group revenues and earnings gather pace.
Skippy is the second largest player in the US peanut butter category, behind JM Smuckers' Jif brand. Ettinger suggested that the company hopes to grow its share of the US nuts and spreads category from the 17% of total sales that it currently accounts for.
"We feel that we can do a very solid job with the core category," Ettinger said. "There are always share opportunities and we will always compete aggressively."
However, given the competitive nature of the category, any share gains are likely to be both modest and hard-won, coming at the expense of margins - which Hormel revealed currently stand at a relatively modest 10-15%. And, with already 74% household penetration in the US, the business is unlikely to benefit greatly from incremental growth.
According to Euromonitor, the nut and seed spreads category is expected to report a compound annual growth rate of 2.6%, or in value terms $200-230m, over the next five years. Much of this growth is coming from speciality nut butters. The speciality nut category is currently valued at just $260m, but the segment witnessed value growth of around 40% last year.
In order to grow the brand domestically then, Ettinger revealed that Hormel plans to "turn our innovation skills lose on this brand" in order to "find ways to take Skippy out of the jar".
"Through innovation [we will] take a brand that has very high penetration and brand appeal and move it into complementary categories," he added.
While the majority of Skippy's $370m annual sales are currently generated in the US, Hormel believes the brand has greatest potential for expansion overseas.
Outside the US, Skippy is the number one peanut butter brand, generating revenues of around $100m. Off the bat, Hormel said the acquisition will increase its international revenues by approximately 30% and expand its global footprint. The business has a presence in more than 30 countries, including China where it operates one manufacturing facility.
In markets like China, where Hormel is currently in the process of rolling out Spam, Ettinger said the deal would enable Hormel to approach retailers with a more compelling offer. "Any time you can bring more offerings into a customer and be more relevant that is helpful... We think it will be a leveraging point to be able to accelerate our growth of Spam," he commented.
Hormel is also banking on its ability to accelerate Skippy's international growth, which is currently in the high single digits.
"We are excited by the international opportunities and China is front-centre of this... we think there are great ways to catch the wave of growth in that market," Ettinger commented. "This brand got out there first and is very well placed to take advantage of that."
While overseas demand for peanut butter is dwarfed by US consumption, Ettinger insisted there is a growing international market for the product. Hormel said it plans to deliver Skippy to an international audience and promote it as a product that can be used as more than a sandwich filler. For example, Ettinger cited the use of peanut butter in cooking as a widespread practise in Asia that Hormel could potentially exploit.
So, while Hormel is facing an uphill struggle to grow Skippy at home, overseas the company is confident it will be able to generate fast-pace growth.
For insight into Unilever's decision to sell Skippy and where the moves leaves the consumer goods powerhouse in the US click here.
Sectors: Condiments, dressings & sauces, Mergers & acquisitions
Companies: Unilever, Hormel Foods
Best bits: UK, Australia highlight divisive nature of FOP label debate
Front-of-pack nutrition labels. It is a divisive subject that can turn those on both sides of the debate a nice shade of red....
Most Popular
- In-depth: Prospects for direct-to-consumer in UK
- PepsiCo's strategy to meet evolving consumer
- General Mills 2018 investor day - 4 takeaways
- Column: Room for improvement at Brandless
- Long read: Does sustainability sell in the UK?
- McCormick to buy Reckitt Benckiser food arm
- Unilever, Hormel 'front-runners' for RB food unit
- Unilever profits up as sales rise, savings kick in
- Unilever seeks innovation from Irish start-ups
- Hershey launches "better-for-you'' popcorn in US
Market research


text:
A nice girls name not ending in "a" or "ie"/"
(55 Posts)
;y" sound...
MrsDibble Fri 23-Aug-13 11:56:20
wouldratherbeonthebeach Thu 29-Aug-13 07:56:49
Rhubarbgarden Thu 29-Aug-13 07:56:23
JennyPiccolo Thu 29-Aug-13 07:50:23
telsa Thu 29-Aug-13 07:45:38
Teapot13 Thu 29-Aug-13 04:48:12
NormanTheForeman Wed 28-Aug-13 23:28:34
Maud2011 Wed 28-Aug-13 20:44:31
MrsDibble Wed 28-Aug-13 19:24:29
salvadory Sun 25-Aug-13 07:03:55
BikeRunSki Sun 25-Aug-13 06:52:11
BikeRunSki Sun 25-Aug-13 06:51:36
BikeRunSki Sun 25-Aug-13 06:50:29
AmericasTorturedBrow Sun 25-Aug-13 06:13:10
AmericasTorturedBrow Sun 25-Aug-13 06:12:33
itried Sat 24-Aug-13 22:59:49
tillyo Sat 24-Aug-13 22:57:06
calilark Sat 24-Aug-13 22:55:55
MotherOfDragon Sat 24-Aug-13 18:41:14
JamieandtheMagicTorch Sat 24-Aug-13 18:27:48
MummyBeerest Sat 24-Aug-13 05:27:13
sleepingbeautiful Sat 24-Aug-13 04:22:00
AmericasTorturedBrow Fri 23-Aug-13 18:59:56
JamieandtheMagicTorch Fri 23-Aug-13 18:50:10
emsyj Fri 23-Aug-13 16:56:45
noodlebum Fri 23-Aug-13 15:16:22
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.


text:
Irigo (16 items)
Welcome back! Whilst you were away we added the functionality to view auctions and bid in pounds.
Irigo: Information on the Catawiki site about Een man genaamd Will Shannon, 1986.
At its heart, Catawiki is an online catalogue with images of, and information on, collectibles. Our catalogue is compiled by users in a similar way to Wikipedia.