text:
Members Login
New Members Sign-Up
Top Boards
Israel hails US call...
Egypt admits wounded...
Obama´s opportu...
Palestinians fire ro...
Israel, Palestinians...
Israel not honoring ...
Gaza Smugglers Ready...
Saudi Asks Israel to...
Israels Political S...
Mideast peace takes ...
Israel-News Today
Week in Review
Symposium: The Gaza Withdrawal (FrontPageMagazine.com) By Jamie Glazov 01/28/05)
Source: http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16813
Front Page Magazine.com
Front Page Magazine.com Articles-Index-Top
Is Sharons pull-out plan shrewd or suicidal? To discuss this issue with us, Frontpage Symposium has assembled a distinguished panel. Our guests goday:
Sol Stern, a contributing editor to City Journal and a Manhattan Institute senior fellow;
Abraham Rabinovich, a former reporter for the Jerusalem Post and a United States Army veteran. He is the author of the new book The Yom Kippur War: The Epic Encounter that Transformed the Middle East;
P. David Hornik, a freelance writer and translator living in Jerusalem who has been contributing recently to FrontPage, American Spectator Online, the Jerusalem Post, the Jewish Press, and Israeli news-views sites;
Steven Plaut, a professor of business finance at the University of Haifa in Israel and at Central European University. He holds a PhD in economics from Princeton and is author of The Scout.
FP: Sol Stern, Abraham Rabinovich, David Hornik and Steven Plaut, thank you for joining Frontpage Symposium.
Prof. Plaut, let me begin with you. Is the withdrawal from Gaza a necessary step for Israel to make?
Plaut: It is a mindless and foolish step for Israel to make. It will result in a massive escalation of violence in the Middle East. What exactly do supporters of the plan think the PLO and its other terror affiliates will be doing once Israeli troops are not on the ground in the Gaza Strip - take up quilting? It is a reward for Palestinian violence. It sets a dangerous precedent. It involves evicting masses of Jews from their homes in the name of "reducing confrontation", while not at the same time demanding an equivalent balancing eviction of any Palestinians from their homes in the name of the same goal, such as removing the population of Jenin and moving it to Gaza.
Gaza is a large complex of terrorist labs, underground bomb factories, and smuggling tunnels even today - when the Israelis are present. Once they are gone, there will be nothing left to stop the Palestinian savages from escalating the terror. Incursions into Israel by Palestinian suicide bombers will increase. The PLO and its sister terrorists have already fired thousands of rockets and mortars into Jewish civilian areas from the Gaza Strip. Once the Israeli military is no longer a force to reckon with inside the Gaza Strip, this bombardment will increase enormously.
Let me emphasize that much of the bombardment to date has been against Israeli civilian homes inside Israel´s pre-1967 Green Line border and not simply against so-called "settlers.
When the inevitable mass bombardment begins, after Sharon´s capitulation is complete, Israel will either have to empty out all of its civilian towns within the ever-increasing firing distance, or it will need to reconquer the Gaza Strip militarily and re-install long- term martial rule there. The latter is more likely. But if all that is going to take place is the restoration of Israeli military control of the Gaza Strip, then what is the point of removing it now? It is a bit like people arguing in early 1945 that because the Japanese are unwilling to make peace after the US has conquered and controls Okinawa, then the solution must be to withdraw from Okinawa in the middle of the war and return to Pearl Harbor.
It is worth noting that Israelis overwhelmingly voted AGAINST the very plan that Sharon is trying to implement. In the last national elections, the proposal for unilateral capitulation to the PLO and withdrawal from the Gaza Strip while evicting its Jewish population was the electoral platform of the opposition Labor Party. Sharon ran AGAINST this plan. But as so often happens in Israel, a month after beating Labor, Sharon adopted its electoral platform. He than called a Likud party referendum to approve the turnabout and Sharon was defeated by his own party there three-to-two.
FP: Ok, fair enough. But Mr. Plaut, surely Sharon is not a traitor to Israel. Surely he sees everything you are saying and has Israels best interests in mind. Obviously his hand is being forced here by dire circumstances. Somewhere in this withdrawal a certain Israeli interest is being served. Put yourself into Sharons shoes and be fair. Why do you think he is doing this? He is not a conniving sell- out, certainly he has a plan here. . . . .
Plaut: There are two schools of thought about Ariel Sharon. One is that he is having his boxer shorts squeezed upon him by the American Administration and especially the State Department, who are desperate for some temporary pretence of "progress" in resolving the Arab- Israeli conflict because they mistakenly think this will lower the hostility to the US of the Islamofascists. The State Department honchos are indifferent to the conclusion that any temporary "relaxation" of confrontation between Israel and the Palestinian terrorists due to such an appeasement will result in a far worse confrontation shortly down the road, with far worse bloodshed and escalated world terror. They insist that the best way to stamp out the bonfire is to bury it in new kindling so that there will be a temporary drop in the height of the flames.
The second school of thought is that Sharon, and much of the rest of the country, is simply so old, exhausted, and demoralized that there is not the will to resist, combined with an underlying foolishness that is willing to grasp at straws, willing to trade off long term disaster for some short term Kodak moments. This is not the Sharon who heroically led his forces across the Suez Canal in 1973. And. like the joke about the fella who had already been divorced 12 times but remarries, the "Gaza Disengagement Plan" is the victory of hopeful self-delusion over reality. There are lists of statements one should never ever believe that are making the rounds on the web, like "The check is in the mail." One should add to the list the statement, "Maybe now the Palestinians will stop the terrorism." Abu Mazen will yet prove to be even worse than Arafat. Only those who know nothing of his background can mistake him for a moderate or a democrat.
I think there is some truth to each of the above two "schools" but there is also a third school of thought. The Likud has never been a party of vision but rather the "Me-Too Labor Party." While rhetorically opposing the Labor platform in matters of security and economics, every single time it holds power the Likud simply implements the Labor Party´s own platform, even when the Likud has run in the elections in explicit opposition to it. The "Sharon Plan" is in fact the plan of far-Leftist Amram Mitzna, the George McGovern of the Israeli Labor Party, and it was rejected by a landslide of Israel voters last year.
It is a waste of time to search for "hidden benefits" that Israel will derive from the Gaza Disengagement Plan. It is like looking for hidden benefits in the Munich Accord.
FP: Mr. Stern?
Stern: Ariel Sharon is the most powerful friend the Israeli settler movement has ever had. Now, with his uncanny ability to read the changing strategic battlefield, he has concluded that the best chance of ensuring control of the bulk of the West Bank settlements housing several hundred thousand Israelis is to relocate 8000 Israelis living in a few isolated enclaves in Gaza. He has seen the Gaza settlements become a distraction for the Israeli army, thus making it harder to uproot the terrorists from the heart of Gaza. He is supported in this strategic thinking by the Israeli military establishment as well as by the current cabinet representing the parliamentary majority. By all accounts, Sharon also has a solid majority of the Israeli public behind him. Professor Plaut seems to concede this point when he berates the Likud for aping the Labor Party. If Likud isnt on his side, who is?
Of course theres nothing dishonorable about being in the minority. In a democracy the minority view of today sometimes turns out to be prophetic and then becomes the majority view of tomorrow. That is what happened in Israel over the Oslo accords. But this isnt Oslo II. Sharon doesnt repeat the mistake of offering significant Israeli concessions on the ground in return for mere Palestinian promises. His moves toward separation in Gaza and the West Bank are good for Israeli security whether the Palestinians reciprocate or not. And they have the added advantage of getting an American president to say for the first time ever that many of the settlements will remain part of Israel in any final agreement.
I am not impressed by Plauts hysterical prediction that separating from Gaza will result in a massive escalation of violence in the Middle East. Where in the Middle East? In Iraq? In Lebanon? Quite the contrary, Sharons moves toward separation, including fencing off the Gaza strip and parts of the West Bank, plus a ruthless decapitation campaign against the terrorist leadership, have already paid off by almost eliminating the wave of suicide bombing. Plaut also raises the specter that more rockets will be fired from Gaza at civilian areas inside Israel. Fair enough. But Israel will then retaliate militarily in exactly the same way that it does today. And this time the army will not have to worry about siphoning off part of its strike force to guard settlements that contribute nothing to Israels security. While only a handful of Israelis have so far been killed by rockets fired from Gaza, hundreds of civilians and soldiers have died defending the isolated and non strategic Gaza settlements.
Professor Plauts military analysis is weak, his comments on Sharons motives are speculative and irrelevant, and his use of the Munich analogy is puerile. I thus suspect that he has other, more ideological reasons for fearing an Israeli military pullback from any part of the territories. But this is a much longer and more emotion laden argument.
FP: Mr. Hornik, Prof. Plaut sees another Munich happening here. Mr. Stern sees a shrewd calculated move based on sound strategic objectives. What do you think?
Hornik: Steven Plaut, who, like me, predicted that the "Oslo process" would bring a rain of terror and death upon Israel, is again on the mark. Mr. Stern is like people during 1993-1995 who said, "Prime Minister Rabin is a smart old Israeli security fox. He knows what he´s doing. He wouldn´t harm Israel´s security. This will work out to Israel´s benefit." What Rabin actually wrought, notwithstanding his rich military background, was the worst disaster that has ever befallen Israel, a nightmare of death, maiming, economic damage, and plummeting immigration, turning Israeli civilian life into a battlefield for eleven years with no end in sight.
Let me address some of Mr. Stern´s points specifically. He says evacuating the 8000 Gaza settlers offers the best chance for keeping the bulk of the West Bank settlements. The sole evidence anyone can provide for this claim is a tepid statement by President Bush that when the Palestinian state is established in virtually all of the West Bank (and all of Gaza), certain "demographic realities" will be taken into account, meaning Israel would be able to keep some settlements or settlement blocs. There is nothing new here because also in Barak´s offer to Arafat in 2000, Israel was supposed to keep some settlement blocs in the few percentage points of West Bank land it was supposed to retain (it so happens that about 80 percent of the West Bank settlers are concentrated in some very small pieces of land). This would be small consolation for turning over almost all of the West Bank to the fully sovereign Palestinian state that President Bush says is his goal. Prime Minister Sharon also says he is fully committed both to the road map and to a Palestinian state. Evacuating Gaza and northern Samaria would appear to be a step toward, not away from, this common goal of a Palestinian state.
Shortly after the Six Day War in 1967, the U.S. government asked the Joint Chiefs of Staff to prepare a professional, nonpolitical assessment of which parts of the newly-conquered land were essential to Israel´s security. The Joint Chiefs´ report states explicitly that Israel can only be defensible if it retains almost all of the West Bank, all of Gaza, and all of the Golan Heights. Nothing has changed since then to alter this assessment--in the era of ballistic missiles, land is even more crucial to Israel. It is still better to have a missile fired from the Lebanese border than from the outskirts of Jerusalem or Tel Aviv. What has changed, actually, is that Western democracies like the U.S. and Israel get tired of difficult situations and start looking for quick fixes and easy solutions. In this spirit, Israel has now, with U.S. encouragement, created a situation where it is surrounded by enclaves controlled by Hizbullah/Iran, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the various PLO offshoots, and you can see the consequences on your evening news unless this spectacle of ongoing carnage is "old news" by now. The disengagement plan transfers more land from Israeli control to jihadi terrorist control, and adds momentum for further land giveaways in the future, which will make Israel less and less defensible either tactically or strategically.
Mr. Stern says the Israeli military establishment supports Sharon´s "strategic thinking." Actually, at the time the disengagement plan was announced, the Israeli chief of staff, head of the GSS (analogous to the FBI), head of the IDF intelligence branch, and commander of the Gaza division issued dire warnings about the plan´s security consequences. I don´t know where Mr. Stern has been. In the first week of January the head of the GSS, Avi Dichter, in a presentation to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, again made grave warnings about the security consequences of disengaging from Gaza and northern Samaria, including leaving Israeli communities defenseless against missiles and infiltrations, an unrestricted flow of weapons into the abandoned areas, and proclaiming far and wide to Israel´s enemies that persistently attacking Israel always pays off and leads to Israel retreats and concessions.
Mr. Stern says Sharon has a solid majority of the Israeli public behind him--a claim based solely on opinion polls. There is a long history of Israeli opinion polls that turned out to be ludicrously off the mark. For instance, just last spring the polls said disengagement would win handily in the Likud referendum. In fact, disengagement lost in a landslide. Antidisengagement Israelis want a referendum and we feel confident that we would win. Sharon seeks to avoid one at all costs--and I mean costs, like dangerous, growing internal dissension and strife. Sharon prefers that strife, even the possible dissolution of Israeli society, to a referendum. Why would that be so, if he believes he would win?
Yes, Israel´s tactical war on the terrorist leadership since Labor left the government in spring 2003 has had a measure of success, reducing suicide bombings and terrorism generally. But there are two caveats here. Thanks to Mr. Sharon, the Labor ministers--almost all of them, from the sound of it, far more dovish than Mr. Stern--are back in the government. Will Israel´s relative hawkishness toward terror continue? I sure hope so, but I´m sure not going to bet on it now that the likes of Shimon Peres are stewards of our fate again. Second, Gaza-based terrorism has dramatically escalated since Sharon announced the disengagement plan. So if Mr. Stern wants to credit Sharon since spring 2003 with a reduction in suicide bombings, he should also "credit" him since spring 2004 with making life unlivable for Israelis both within and near Gaza, turning Sderot into a besieged border town, necessitating constant IDF warfare against the Gaza terrorists, and overall gravely worsening the security situation both in Gaza and in the adjacent parts of southern Israel.
Mr. Stern also says that Plaut "raises the specter" of more rockets being fired from Gaza after disengagement, but assures us that the IDF will then be able to take care of the problem handily. An army that has left an area, lost most or all of its intelligence sources, allowed enemy forces to build and fortify themselves there as much and as long as they want, will obviously have a much more difficult time operating in that area than it had while it still had a presence in it. Especially if the area has meanwhile upgraded its political status, possibly to statehood. What can now be achieved by IDF operations and incursions will, after a pullback, require full-scale warfare under much worse military, political, and diplomatic conditions. If the U.S. were to withdraw from Iraq tomorrow and go back there three months from now, it would of course have an even much worse time than it is having now.
Israel´s land withdrawals over the past eleven years, from southern Lebanon and parts of the territories, have proved disastrous. Mr. Stern is apparently encouraged by this spectacle and his conclusion is--more of the same.
FP: Mr. Rabinovich?
Rabinovich: I find myself lingering over the image of Munich and Neville Chamberlain. Somehow, the picture of Ariel Sharon in pinstripe suit and bowler hat holding a folded umbrella is hard to get a focus on. Even less so the idea of him waving a piece of paper and declaring that he has brought peace in our time. If there is anyone less given to blind faith in ones enemies it is this wily old warrior.
Sharon has proven to be one of the most intriguing political personalities of our time, someone who, in his mid-70s, has undergone a stunning transformation of outlook. One of his former commanders once told me of Sharons performance on the battlefield: Arik cant execute any plan except his own. He has certainly confounded his enemies, and his friends, with this one.
I believe his Gaza pullout plan is the right move, maybe even for the right reasons. His game plan is clear enough. By relinquishing Gaza, he has won for the first time an American presidents support for retention by Israel of some settlement blocs on the West Bank. President Bush also declared opposition to Palestinian demands that refugees have the right of return to Israel. By declaring the pullout to be a unilateral move in the absence of a Palestinian peace partner, Sharon was saying Israel would decide where the interim boundaries on the West Bank would be, while indicating that interim could be a very long time.
The planned pullout has shocked the Palestinians out of knee-jerk antagonism and made them begin to think afresh about what might be other than ongoing violence. The debate going on within Palestinian society is intriguing. The death of Yasser Arafat is certainly a major factor in this reassessment but so is Sharon move. With Israel gone, who will run the Gaza Strip? Will it become an expanded base for warfare against Israel? Or a model for a future Palestinian state? It is up to the Palestinians to figure this out. If they choose warfare, I have no doubt about their fate. If they choose to build a viable society, new prospects are opened.
As for Prof. Plauts point that Israelis who voted Sharon into office were voting for a platform opposite to the one Sharon has in fact adopted, that is a misreading. I would say that most of the center- left voters who gave Sharon his overwhelming majority, and I was one of them, were not voting for his right-wing Likud platform but for a general with pearl-handled Uzis. In the face of the Palestinian uprising, Israels citizens wanted to be led by someone who kicked butt. They got someone who not only could do that but proved that he could think anew. The voters, as polls show, have not been disappointed.
As for the security concerns expressed by Mr. Hornik, there is no end to the doomsday scenarios with which we can frighten ourselves. It is clear that Israel will have to maintain vigilance when didnt it have to? but that doesnt mean that it must give up trying to achieve peace. He says it is better to have a missile fired from Lebanon than from the outskirts of Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. I fail to see how it is better if he means that the missiles would be significantly less accurate, thats debatable. And we should recall that Jerusalem was indeed heavily shelled from its outskirts for two days in 1967 which did not inhibit Israels sensational victory.
The point is that we have to try to prevent missiles from being fired at all. The best way to achieve that, I believe the only way, is to give the Palestinians something to lose. Namely, a Palestinian state. To throw them some territorial bones will not do it. They will need a viable state, and that means the bulk of the West Bank as well as the Gaza Strip, in which they can invest their energies, ambitions and pride. Sure, they will continue to pray for Israels disappearance but for the bulk of Palestinian society a state of their own, alongside a militarily and economically powerful Israel, will mean a new playing field and a new mindset. For the region, it would mean a new political dynamic.
Plaut: Stern wants Israel to abandon any Jewish land whose defense is a "nuisance" for the army, and it is only a matter of time before there will be calls for Israel to abandon Haifa and Beer Sheba to the terrorists because their defense is draining real resources from social programs. Incredibly, Stern does not realize he is proposing "peace through appeasement". When in history has peace been achieved through this sort of appeasement? It is least likely to be achieved this way in the Middle East, where goodwill gestures are sure to be taken as signs of weakness.
It is not clear that Stern is correct that Israeli opponents of the Gaza "Plan" are in the minority. Voters have repeatedly REJECTED it, and TV polls are not reliable gauges. But even if Stern is correct, opponents to Rabin´s Oslo "Accords" were in the minority in the mid- 90s, yet proved correct on each and every point they raised, while the "majority" was dead wrong across the board. That earlier "plan" endorsed by the majority produced 1600 murdered Israelis, tens of thousands of wounded, and turned Israel into the Valley of the Shadow of Death. I have no doubt that Stern dismissed the opponents of Oslo back then as "hysterical" as well.
Rabinovich thinks the Palestinians have now been "shocked out of antagonism" and are ready for peace. I do not see either him or Stern buying up homes in Sderot, which has taken the brunt of the rocket attacks, in order to move their families there. How many times in the past have we been assured that the Palestinians had abandoned terror and genocide as their ambition?
Rabinovich´s plan is to appease the Sudetenized Palestinians, to give them a state and then let´s see. What do we say of those who wanted to give Saddam or Iran weapons of mass destruction and then let´s see? The burden of proof is on those who claim that unilateral withdrawal by Israel will produce peace, not on those who warn it will not. Since when is the resolution of a state of uncertainty found in the agreement of the threatened to place its neck in a hangman´s noose for purposes of testing the intentions of the executioner, standing next to the rope, and waiting to see? The Palestinians were already given "something to lose" (in Rabinovich´s words) by Israel in the 1990s, and it turned out they did not care at all about losing it in the holy cause of murdering Jewish children. There is no reason to claim that giving them more to lose will have different consequences.
Stern takes at face value Sharon´s claim that by giving the PLO free rein in the Gaza Strip, Israel will be able to retain the West Bank under its control. Sharon claims that the unilateral capitulation in Gaza will NOT serve as precedent for the West Bank. I do not believe him, and I am convinced Sharon himself knows the Gaza capitulation will serve as precedent for new pressures on Israel to return to its indefensible 1967 borders in the West Bank as well. The pressures are already evident.
Until someone can prove in a persuasive manner that a Palestinian state will seek peace, the "let´s give it a try" school are like those lemmings suggesting giving leaping off the cliff a try, to see what it is like. Absolutely everything we know about the PLO, Abu Mazen, and the Middle East tells us that this "state" will be nothing but a base of terror from which to launch the final genocidal assault against Israel.
Stern: I accept that serious arguments can be made against the Gaza disengagement plan. But for the most part, Prof. Plaut and Mr. Hornik dont make them. Instead they once again trot out a long list of imaginary horribles. This is another Munich, they imply. Or, its another Oslo. Let me elaborate on what I said in round one: The Munich analogy is so historically absurd and so morally inappropriate when it is directed at a Jewish government with the most powerful military force in the region, that it isnt even worth debating. It should also be apparent to any reasonable person that none of the destructive elements of the Oslo deal are present here. This time Israel gives the Palestinians nothing of military value they dont already have. Gaza disengagement doesnt make it easier for the terrorists to penetrate Israels borders; it doesnt convey new political stature on the Palestinian leadership or raise their international standing. Quite the contrary, by removing a few isolated settlements that contribute nothing to Israels security, but are actually a drain on Israels military resources, the pressure is clearly on the Palestinian Authority to create order in Gaza and reign in the terrorists.
I grant that the Palestinian leadership doesnt have much of a track record for rational behavior. The possibility that they will initiate or tolerate an escalation of terrorist rocket attacks on civilian Jewish communities must surely be part of any calculation of risk. But it isnt as if the current arrangement is risk free. Despite the presence of the Israeli army, the rocket attacks have become so numerous that even prominent Israeli doves are calling for a ruthless response. Yoel Marcus of Haaretz, a fervent supporter of disengagement, and previously of Oslo, has just written that if the attacks continue Israel should respond tit for tat with rocket attacks against civilian Palestinian communities. Im not sure that I would go that far, but the point is that after a disengagement Israels government will still have a powerful military deterrent against attacks coming from Gaza, just as it has a military deterrent against attacks coming from Jenin. Moreover, since the government has staked its reputation on the presumed advantages of a Gaza pullout, it is likely to have even more of an incentive to use overwhelming force against any new rocket attacks. And it is reasonable to believe that the same government that is winning the war against the suicide bombers with the help of a separation fence in the West Bank will also figure out how to stop or neutralize the threat of suicide bomber attacks with a separation fence around Gaza.
Am I expecting peace and serenity? Far from it. I dont even have any illusion that the Gaza disengagement will lead to a revival of serious peace negotiations, or that after disengagement the Palestinians will be more likely to compromise on Jerusalem, final borders or the right of return. I am much less sanguine than Mr. Rabinovich that offering the Palestinians a state will make them realize they have so much to lose that they will turn rational in pursuing their material self interest. Alas, one of the lessons of Oslo is that there is a deep seated pathology running through Palestinian political culture.
The problem with Prof. Plaut and Mr. Hornik, on the other hand, is that they seem to believe that because they were right in their prophesies about Oslo (a point I conceded in my first response) anyone who disagrees with them about disengagement or the security value of the isolated Israeli settlements in Gaza is simply repeating the mistakes of Oslo all over again. In fact, the Israeli political center the silent majority if you will has learned well the lessons of Oslo. Their discovery of the depths of Palestinian pathology is why they elected Arik Sharon in the first place and now helps explain why this majority wants to separate from the Palestinians.
One problem created by the way this debate has been framed is that it has been all about the putative risks of the disengagement policy. Prof. Plaut and Mr. Hornik can then allow their imaginations and dreaded scenarios to run wild. But lets turn the argument around and ask about the risks inherent in their positions -- no separation, no strategic retreats, no Palestinian state under any circumstances. I can play the same game and draw up a long list of prospective disasters for Israel if it adopted a not-an-inch policy. I will just mention two.
First, it will almost certainly mean blowing off the irreplaceable political and strategic support of the most pro-Israel US administration in history. Does any responsible Israeli government really want to be seen as standing on the side and thumbing its nose at George Bushs brave crusade for spreading democracy and freedom in the Middle East?
Second, if there is never any disengagement from Gaza or any part of the West Bank what will the government of Israel do if the Palestinians come to the UN and declare: OK, one land, one government, and one man one vote. Do Plaut and Hornik really think that any government in the world, including the Bush administration, will support Israel on this? And even if we discount some of the scarier demographic projections put out by the Israeli left, do Plaut and Hornik really want to live in a Jewish state with, at the very least, a 40% Arab minority?
All of Israels possible military options in Gaza are fraught with serious risks. None of the possible scenarios Plaut and Hornik have presented convince me that the status quo is less risky than separation.
Hornik: The situation in the Middle East is now extremely fluid and uncertain. Much of the Palestinian anti-Israeli terror is being directed and instigated by outside forces, mainly Iran and Syria (also Egypt). The Bush administration knows that the success of its war on terror mandates dealing with the Iranian regime. The removal or serious weakening of this regime would change the picture in the region considerably. It would leave both Syria and Hizbullah weak and exposed--the latter, perhaps, nonviable. The Palestinians´ genocidal aims toward Israel would not change, but their ability to act on them would decline considerably after losing most of their outside support.
In the midst of this fluid situation, in the midst of this war, Sharon and his supporters like Mr. Stern and Mr. Rabinovich want to be good dhimmis and accept the Muslim dictate that Gaza, with its rich Jewish historical associations, must be made eternally Judenrein, and southern Israel mustat least for the time being--turn into a mortally dangerous border zone. (And it is not just southern Israel. The Gaza terrorists already have shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles. Enjoy your next flight to Israel.)
The Israeli communities near Gaza have already been given tax breaks and are now officially recognized as "front-line" communities. The residents of these communities don´t relish the prospective IDF (IDF, Mr. Stern--not just the settlements) withdrawal from Gaza at all. They´ve become "hawkish" like the residents of northern Israel before the Lebanon War of 1982--in other words, they want Israel´s army to protect them and not abandon them. Both Mr. Stern and Mr. Rabinovich acknowledge that attacks on these communities from Gaza may (read: will) continue after the disengagement, but are confident that the IDF will handle the problem and Israel will come out ahead in the cost-benefit analysis. Gentlemen, this is playing with people´s lives. Since when does an army withdraw from a war zone in the middle of the war, leave a population exposed to attack, and say, "Let´s hope for the best, folks--don´t worry, if a lot of you die, we´ll retaliate"?
Mr. Rabinovich is not sure why it´s less bad to have a missile fired from the Lebanese border than from the outskirts of Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Why was there a Cuban missile crisis? Why did the U.S. get alarmed in 1962 about Soviet missiles in Cuba when there were already Soviet missiles aimed at the U.S. from more distant locations? Hizbullah missiles fired from the Lebanese border can do a lot of damage to Haifa or Hadera but cannot hit the heartland of Israel´s civilian and military infrastructure. Missiles fired from the West Bank as the first volley of a war could immobilize Israel even before it could muster a military response. Mr. Rabinovich knows that as a direct result of dovish Israeli policy in recent years, there are now about 13,000 Hizbullah missiles along the Lebanese border. His view, apparently, is that if thousands more such missiles are emplaced in evacuated parts of Gaza and the West Bank--so what?
And I emphasize--so far Israel has done nothing about the Hizbullah missiles.
The long-term issues Mr. Stern raises regarding demography and the ultimate political disposition of the territories are real. He wants the issues to be decided now, under a hail of Kassam fire on Israeli communities in and near Gaza. Should we say--"All right, terrorists, four years of missiles on our communities have made their point, we´re getting out of here," or, "We´re going to hold out for an eventual political solution in which everyone´s rights will be respected, no communities will be forcefully evacuated, and no area of land will be declared off limits to any ethnic or religious group"? Mr. Stern, what effect does the first option have on the terrorist mentality? Did Bin Laden attack New York and Washington because America looked strong, or because it looked weak?
Mr. Rabinovich says, "As for the security concerns expressed by Mr. Hornik, there is no end to the doomsday scenarios with which we can frighten ourselves." Mr. Stern says: "Prof. Plaut and Mr. Hornik can then allow their imaginations and dreaded scenarios to run wild." You hear the chuckle, the dismissal. Nothing convinces these gentlemen that the world is dangerous. If people like Steven Plaut and me got it right about Oslo, was it just chance, a lucky call, or did it perhaps have something to do with a deeper grasp of reality? 1600 murdered Israelis later, we still apparently haven´t earned the right to be taken seriously by Mr. Rabinovich and Mr. Stern.
FP: Mr. Rabinovich, you have implied that it is possible that the Palestinians may eventually accept peaceful co-existence with Israel. I know that we must have hope and that, even though it is unrealistic, cautious moves must still be made for peace. And that is why I am not necessarily opposed to what Sharon is doing. But I have to say that, while I support certain peace initiatives as shrewd tactics for Israel for the sake of its own survival, I think it is undeniable that the majority of Palestinians, like the majority of Arabs, live on the oxygen of Jew-hatred. The purpose of their lives is to hate Jews. Without Jew-hatred, they may even cease to exist. The Palestinians have shown, over and over again, that they yearn more for drenching themselves with the blood of Jews and sacrificing their own kids rather than creating their own state and living functional happy lives. Why would you think this situation has changed or may ever change?
Rabinovich: We have to take as a working assumption that this generation of Palestinians, especially refugees who still remember homes in what is now Israel, will never reconcile itself to Israels existence. And probably not the next generation. But over time, black and white positions take on shadings. In Amman a few years ago, I spoke to a storekeeper who turned out to be a Palestinian refugee. He assumed I was an American reporter and spoke bitterly about the Israelis, whom he demonized. He said he still had the key to his house in Jaffa where he intended one day to return. When I told him I was from The Jerusalem Post, he asked a boy working there to bring me coffee and gestured me to a chair. You didnt understand, I said. Im from Israel. He said he did understand and asked me again to sit down. We proceeded to have a calm, even friendly, discussion about politics and parted with a handshake. When I spoke with younger Palestinians who had been born in Jordan none of them said he would go back to live in his parents former village or town in what is now Israel if that became a possibility. They all had lives to live where they were. Things change. We can look at the French and Germans. Germans and Russians. Chinese and Japanese. They all did worse things to each other than what the Jews and Arabs have done to each other. What is certain is that Israel has to remain vigilant for a long time to come which in itself is not a bad thing.
Plaut: So let me see if I understand what Rabinovich is saying. He thinks Israel should trust that the Palestinian terrorists and Islamofascists have now suddenly decided to forgo war and genocide, this on the basis of the fact that he was offered coffee by a Palestinian in Jordan? Is that what he is thinking?
As for Stern, he needs to make up his mind. Either he thinks the Gaza Disengagement plan at last gives the Palestinians "something to lose", in his words, or he thinks it gives them nothing they do not already have, also in his words. In fact, even if he does not like the historic associations, the "plan" is just the latest in an endless series of attempts to appease the Palestinians and the Arab world, to wean them from terror and Islamofascism through niceness and goodwill concessions. He thinks the analogy with appeasement in the 30s is obscene? Tough!
Stern supports the Gaza Capitulation because he sees no dangers to Israel from implementing it. Never mind that once Israel is out of the Gaza Strip, an ever-widening belt of Israeli territory will be turned into a burnt-earth no-man´s-land by the thousands of Palestinian rockets that will be fired into Israel from Gaza.
There will be no Israeli troops on the ground inside the Gaza Strip to stop them. And the world will exert irresistible pressure that will prevent Israeli troops from entering Gaza to retaliate, even if Stern found a leftist journalist at Israel´s equivalent to "Counterpunch" who claims to believe that Israeli retaliation will follow PLO terror attacks. And never mind the thousands of similar empty assurances that accompanied the original marketing of the Oslo "peace accord" in the 1990s. Sorry, I am not reassured.
Stern seeks to stampede Israel into mindless capitulation by pointing out that the status quo is bad. This is the same tired old argument that rheumatism is bad so why not try arsenic, since - after all - how can we really KNOW arsenic is poisonous. For the past 15 years, Israeli politicians have consistently made things worse, converting the near-tranquility of 1990, following Israel´s defeat and suppression of the "First Palestinians Intifada", into the Oslo Carnage, doing so all the while whining about how awful that status quo is. Poverty of the imagination is a human weakness and often expresses itself in the insistence that things could just not get worse.
Things can ALWAYS get worse. For fifteen years Israeli politicians have made them worse by convincing the public that things are currently so awful that there is nothing to lose. Tell that to the people in Sderot. I doubt they will be reassured by Stern´s pollyanna about how Israel will no doubt figure out how to eliminate the rockets and mortars without military presence inside the Gaza Strip.
Like medical doctors, it is the first responsibility of politicians to prevent things from getting worse. Leaders cannot always resolve real-world problems and make bad situations go away, but morally responsible leaders must resist the populist temptation of "Things are bad so just do something", even when that something produces catastrophe.
Why does not Stern follow his own "logic" to its natural conclusion. Israeli towns in the Galilee and Negev also drain resources. Why not abandon them also to the PLO? Why wait for Israel to be behind its 1967 borders before agreeing to the inevitable PLO demands control of the Galilee and Negev? Stern and Rabinovich are from the genre who want Israel to try any "solution" to the problems of terrorism and Arab fascism except the only one that will work: peace through military victory. The only way to make peace with the "Palestinians" is to impose long-term Israeli military rule over the Palestinian population and implement a program of full-scale comprehensive Denazification, based in part on the Allied programs after World War II.
Stern: This is getting boring. Professor Plaut and Mr. Hornik add nothing new in this round about the risks associated with Gaza disengagement. Rather they repeat their assertion (actually speculation) that southern Israel will be confronted with a massive new missile threat that the IDF will not be able to cope with. And again they conveniently ignore the fact that hundreds of Israelis have already been killed, and many more are likely to be killed in the future, defending the strategically useless settlements.
Let us note, however, that they do introduce a scummy new argumentative technique that I never thought I would hear from a fellow Zionist. Im used to being called a Nazi by left wing jihadists. Now here in Front Page Magazine, of all places, I am accused of advocating the Nazi like policy of making Gaza judenrein. (Jamie, you are also vulnerable to the same charge for even contemplating the removal of settlements.) Of course, the issue of the settlements, which are extensions of Israeli sovereignty, has nothing to do with preventing individual Jews from residing in Palestine. And, just for the record, I want to say that if either Prof. Plaut or Mr. Hornik desire to fulfill their Zionism by renting an apartment in Gaza City I would support their right to do so.
Nevertheless, I want to express my appreciation to my opponents for finally responding to the question I posed earlier: If not disengagement, what policy would they have the government follow? We are now assured by these military analysts -- who I apparently misjudged as implacable hard liners -- that there actually is a better way to make peace. And what is this road to peace that is so much more realistic and appealing than the Munich of evacuating a handful of isolated settlements? It is long term military rule over the Palestinian population and the imposition of full scale comprehensive Denazification, based in part of the Allied programs after World War II.
I am left breathless by the sheer audacity and imagination of the Plaut peace plan. Im even kicking myself for not thinking of this myself. Here we Jews have been bogged down in nasty arguments about what to do about a few inconsequential settlements in Gaza. Some soldiers on the left are refusing to serve in the West Bank or Gaza; a lot more soldiers on the religious right are threatening to refuse any orders to remove the Gaza settlers. Now, thanks to Plaut, we have the perfect way out of this dangerous impasse: Left and right will be reunited in the great new Zionist enterprise of transforming the Palestinians into peace loving democrats, just like the Germans and Japanese after World War II.
I can just see it now. The Israeli army will be mobilized and fight its way back into the territories to establish a new military government. We will stage some exemplary war crimes trials and break up the madrasses. Then we will send our best young people into the Palestinian communities to teach the next generation about democracy, bringing new textbooks for the schools. Maybe we will even help out our Palestinian brothers and write a new constitution for them, ala MacArthur in Japan. Of course, we will also need another Marshall plan. The reconstruction costs will be high (forget about the loss of life; Jews are always willing to sacrifice for a great cause) but since the American people now believe in spreading democracy abroad, who is to say they won´t be willing to foot the bill?
Anyway, why focus on the costs of such Zionist idealism? Just think of the benefits. In another generation or two (or three or four) the Palestinians will be ready for independence and peace. Then we can get back to the current question of the day and finally get out of Gaza peacefully. Do I hear Plaut and Hornik murmuring, not so fast? Oh well, the Palestinans can then settle for one man one vote and we can all live together in a great multicultural democracy. Either way, I cant wait to start down Plaut and Horniks yellow brick road to Zionist fulfillment.
Hornik: The reason Mr. Stern finds antidisengagement arguments so boring, apparently, is that he has no answers to them. He hasn´t addressed the fact that the head of the General Security Service and other Israeli security professionals have made dire warnings about the disengagement plan; the fact that a study by the Joint Chiefs of Staff declared almost all of the post-1967 territories to be indispensable to Israel´s security; the fact that the policy of Ariel Sharon, in whose sagacity he has so much faith, has already directly caused a severe worsening of the security situation in both Gaza and the western Negev; the argument that once an army leaves an area, it´s much harder, if at all possible, for it to act effectively there; the possibility (and it´s only a possibility, but a real one) that the Palestinians will lose the support of the Iran-Syria- Hizbullah axis, which could open the door to arrangements that are both safer and fairer for Israel; the argument that leaving the Negev communities completely exposed to attack while assumingrather baselesslythat Israel always handles security problems well, constitutes gambling with people´s lives; or the argument that unilaterally fleeing from areas that are under military pressure gives terrorists a huge shot in the arm and increases pressures and momentum toward further flights from even more tactically and strategically sensitive areas.
Space is limited and perhaps Mr. Stern couldn´t have addressed all of these arguments, but it seems he could have addressed at least some of them instead of fulminating so much. He keeps repeating his mantra about hundreds of soldiers (not sure where he gets that figure) dying for the few useless Gaza settlements, most of which were established for strategic reasons by Labor governments, then jumps back to assuring us that a Gaza empty of both settlements and the IDF poses no serious threat. Instead of complaining that he´s being called a Nazi, he might explain why the statement "Peace requires that Gaza be cleared of Jews" is morally superior to the statement "Peace requires that the Galilee be cleared of Arabs," but I won´t hold my breath.
For the record, the Jewish connection to Gaza, for which Sol Stern has such boundless derision, goes back to biblical timesmuch longer than, say, the Muslim connection to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, which everyone considers completely sacrosanct. Israelis, or at least some of us, have learned the hard way in recent years that there is a link between pride and prudence. When we say, "We have no values except peacetake this, take that, take the Temple Mount, whatever, just give us peace"we don´t gain anything except children being blown to pieces in buses.
Mr. Stern then takes a statement by Prof. Plaut and attributes it, for some reason, to me as well. Also for the record, I´m not sure the U.S.-Israeli alliance could withstand the strain of the assertive approach to the Palestinians and the territories that Prof. Plaut suggests. I believe Israel should retain military control, or at the very least military access, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean and hope for an eventual positive evolution from within the Arab-Muslim world, one that would enable a truly fair solution in which no one, Jew or Arab, would be forced to leave his home and no party would have to make security concessions that could turn out to be disastrous if things went wrong.
Abraham Rabinovich does not seem able to face the extent of Muslim- Arab rejection and hatred of Israel. The fact that he is so impressed by the incident with the Palestinian´s hospitality in Amman is, unfortunately, paradigmatic of a sizable part of the Israeli population that is dying for acceptance by the Arabs and has low standards for what constitutes such acceptance. When Israelis with this mindset got control of our government in 1992, they hugged Yasser Arafat and beamed at him and the result was calamity. Mr. Rabinovich mentions several times the need for Israel to be "vigilant." Vigilance means that, in the tiny space of the fifty miles between the Jordan and the Mediterannean, one does not hand over territory gratis to the likes of Arafat or his longtime lieutenant Abu Mazen and then hope that, for some reason, at that moment the century-long Arab-Muslim extermination war against Zionism and Israel will end.
FP: Mr. Rabinovich?
Rabinovich: I agree with Sol Stern. This discussion has gone on too long. Over and out.
FP: Fair enough, then let´s give Mr. Stern the final word then if he wishes. Mr. Stern?
Stern: I see no need to get into a discussion about what every last Israeli general says about the risks of giving up the Gaza settlements, since I conceded there were risks. I have said that when looked at in totality, and balancing those risks against the potential strategic military and political gains, disengagement in Gaza appears to the military establishment and the present government to be a prudent policy. Of course there will still be threats. But the separation fence is working in the West Bank and there is reason to believe it will work in Gaza. Mr. Hornik can continue comparing this strategic initiative by a right wing Israeli government to Nazi era judenrein policies, but then I dont have to give him much credit as being a morally serious person.
Still, Im glad that Mr. Hornik disassociates himself from Professor Plauts kooky denazification peace plan. I also happen to agree that Israel should retain military control, or at the very least military access, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean until the Palestinians go through a moral and political transformation about Israels right to exist. In my view, withdrawing from the isolated Gaza settlements is consistent with Israel maintaining military access to the rest of Gaza.
FP: Sol Stern, Abraham Rabinovich, David Hornik and Steven Plaut, our time is up. Thank you kindly for joining us today. We hope to see you again soon. (©2005 FrontPageMagazine.com 01/28/05)
Return to Top


text:
The Project
About BEP
The ultimate goal of the Council is "Social Reconstruction Through Education" and Drastic reduction in illiteracy.
Universalization of Elementary Education
Its a composite program of Universal Access, Universal Enrolment, Universal Retention and Universal Achievement.
Move Forward With Your Education
The Bihar Education Project Council (BEPC) - Aurangabad, popularly known as Bihar Education Project (BEP - Aurangabad) is an organization dedicated to achieving Universal Elementary Education (UEE) in the District of Aurangabad, Bihar, India
The organization is responsible for making elementary education stronger by improving education standard in elementary schools. Encouraging school age children to join school and preventing dropouts from school is also its responsibility.The council has District Offices in 37 districts of Bihar. The main office is located in Patna.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
School kids bombarded by tests, with little time for learning. Parents priced out of health insurance. Families moved from homes scuttled by foreclosure.
One LA, a grass-roots mover and shaker, rallied San Fernando Valley schools, synagogues and churches Sunday to solve these problems and more.
"Why are we here?" asked Rabbi Don Goor of Temple Judea, where more than 500 residents packed the pews for a standing-room only crowd in Tarzana.
"Today is about the power of the San Fernando Valley to breathe new life into dry bones -- to breathe new life into the San Fernando Valley. Let's do it."
The One LA Community Congress of the San Fernando Valley billed itself as a new political force in the Valley.
One LA, an affiliate of the Chicago-based Industrial Area Foundation, has vowed to "build power" for social and economic change.
"Today, the leadership of the northeast Valley is joining the Westside - the Latino community and the Jewish community -- coming together to address three key ills that are affecting our community," said Yvonne Mariajimenez, deputy director of Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles, based in Pacoima.
One LA's Valley chapter announced a three-part strategy to improve the local schools, state health care and the national housing crisis:
Organize Los Angeles parents, teachers and administrators to implement healthy school lunches - through local taste tests - that kids were willing to eat.
Work with lawmakers in Sacramento to pass Assembly Bill 52, giving the state power to regulate increases in health insurance rates.
Pressure banks via city officials to join a federally approved home loan modification plan to keep families in their homes. The plan, hatched by One LA three years ago, would offer public loans to banks for lowering a home's principle to market value, payable upon sale of the property.
In the San Fernando Valley, for example, home sales dropped by 8 percent in September, compared to the same month last year.
The afternoon congress at Temple Judea was attended by at least 20 nonprofit agencies, churches, schools and synagogues, with interludes of mariachi and klezmer music.
Throughout the meeting, key politicians agreed to meet One LA's agenda, including Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles, author of the health insurance bill, Los Angeles City Council President Eric Garcetti and LAUSD board member Steve Zimmer.
In Sun Valley, parents at Fernangeles Elementary School had fought a local landfill blamed on high asthma rates in kids. They'd fought for teacher support to raise test scores.
And they'd supported healthy school lunches.
What they weren't prepared for, however, was the new healthy lunch menu introduced this fall that their kids weren't willing to eat.
Instead of the familiar chalupas, 10-year-old Denise Lizaola found plates of hummus and pita, curry and vegetables and Chinese broccoli and beef.
"She came home and said, `Mom, the food is different'," said Isabel Mendoza, her mother, before addressing the One LA rally. " `The smell, it's bad. I don't know what it is.'
"Every day she'd throw her food in the trash."
She and other Fernangeles Elementary parents have asked LAUSD administrators join them for a food tasting night on Dec. 14.
Zimmer, the school board member, agreed.
"The issue of our menus in the LAUSD, sometimes when we make progress, we take two steps back," said Zimmer, a member of Temple Judea. "We need to explain to parents this menu, so they become familiar with it."


text:
IT Kitchens Chilton Beech Effect Drawer Line Door & Drawer Front (W)400mm, Set of 1 Door & 1 Drawer Pack
- Beech effect, non-framed door with a panelled design and matt finish
- Built to last - 10 years guaranteed
- Compatible with 400mm base cabinets - or 800mm base cabinets (2 packs required)
- Buying guide pack number - Pack P
- Contents - Drawer: (H)156mm (W)397mm, Door: (H)557mm (W)397mm
- Delivery date confirmed at checkout
Product info
Features and benefits
Versatile and flexible, our Chilton Beech Effect kitchen mixes classic style with everyday practicality. The soft beech tones and gentle grain detail add a hint of warmth and softness that works effortlessly in any space.
Tech specs
|Range :
|Chilton Beech Effect
|Model :
|Pack P
|Compatibility :
|400mm base cabinets - or 800mm base cabinets (2 packs required)
|Finish :
|Beech effect
|Material :
|Construction :
|Membrane pressed PVC foil
|Surface finish :
|Frame :
|Handles included :
|Handles & door knobs are available separately
|Hinges included :
|Hinges, including soft-close, available separately
|Accessories available :
|Drawer box available separately
|Height :
|Width :
|Thickness :
More information
- Kitchen formerly known as IT Kitchens Beech Style
- If you're looking for kitchen ideas and inspiration, B&Q are here to help. We have dedicated experts to guide you through your project with free consultation to design, plan and personalise your new kitchen.
- Our kitchen doors are designed and manufactured in Italy by experienced craftsmen and each kitchen is personally inspected and hand finished by experts. That's why we guarantee them for 10 years.


text:
Washington Attorney Referral Services
Locate a Local Products & Services Lawyer
Looking for an attorney can be a difficult and confusing experience. As a result, many people turn to attorney referral services to help them find a good lawyer. Unfortunately, the state and county bar associations of Washington State do not provide much in the way of attorney referral services.
The Washington State Bar Association does not offer any attorney referral service. Some county bar associations do offer this service - the State Bar's website has contact information for them. However, it appears that only 6 counties in Washington offer lawyer referrals. Although the Washington Bar's website does mention that "most programs will refer to surrounding counties," there does not appear to be bar association attorney referral services in much of the state.
A better option when looking for a lawyer in Washington is to use a private attorney referral service. These services can easily be found online with a quick search. Private attorney referral services are usually free to use, and often give multiple referrals. Finally, they help you in choosing the right lawyer by providing information about these attorneys, such as their education and work history.
If you live in Seattle or the greater Kings County, a full review of available lawyer referral services is available here: Lawyer Referral Services in Kings County, WA
Consult a Lawyer - Present Your Case Now!
Last Modified: 11-24-2009 08:43 AM PST
Link to this page


text:
by Staff Writers
Canberra, Australia (SPX) Jul 22, 2014
Scientists at The Australian National University (ANU) have uncovered the secret to twisting light at will. It is the latest step in the development of photonics, the faster, more compact and less carbon-hungry successor to electronics.
A random find in the washing basket led the team to create the latest in a new breed of materials known as metamaterials. These artificial materials show extraordinary properties quite unlike natural materials.
"Our material can put a twist into light - that is, rotate its polarisation - orders of magnitude more strongly than natural materials," said lead author Mingkai Liu, a PhD student at the ANU Research School of Physics and Engineering (RSPE).
"And we can switch the effect on and off directly with light," said Mr Liu .
Electronics is estimated to account for two per cent of the global carbon footprint, a figure which photonics has the potential to reduce significantly.
Already light carried by fibre optics, has replaced electricity for carrying signals over long distances. The next step is to develop photonic analogues of electronic computer chips, by actively controlling the properties of light, such as its polarisation.
The ability of a material to rotate polarisation, as in this experiment, springs from the asymmetry of a molecule. It occurs in natural minerals and substances; for example, sugar is asymmetric and so polarisation rotation can be used to measure sugar concentrations, which is useful in diabetes research.
However the remarkable properties of this artificial material might first be put to use in the budding photonics industry, suggests co-author Dr David Powell, also from RSPE.
"It's another completely new tool in the toolbox for processing light," he says. "Thin slices of these materials can replace bulky collections of lenses and mirrors. This miniaturisation could lead to the creation of more compact opto-electronic devices, such as a light-based version of the electronic transistor."
The metamaterials are formed from a pattern of tiny metal shapes, dubbed meta-atoms. To obtain optical rotation Mr Liu and his colleagues used pairs of C-shaped meta-atoms, one suspended above the other by a fine wire. When light is shined on to the pair of meta-atoms the top one rotates, making the system asymmetric.
"The high responsiveness of the system comes because it is very easy to make something hanging rotate," says Mr Liu.
"The idea came to me when I found a piece of wire in my washing one day."
The fact that the team's meta-atoms move when light shines on them adds a new dimension, he says.
"Because light affects the symmetry of our system, you can tune your material's response simply by shining a light beam on it. Tunability of a metamaterial is an important step towards building devices based on these artificial materials," he says.
Related Links
Australian National University
Space Technology News - Applications and Research
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.


text:
Whole Foods draws attention
AUSTIN, Texas — As it continues to grow into an internationally known brand, Whole Foods Market Inc. is learning a lesson that has been taught to many up-and-coming corporations before it.
The bigger the company gets, the brighter the spotlight — both for good and bad — that shines on it.
That's become a fact of life for the Austin-based natural foods grocer, which is flying higher than ever with more than 350 stores and posting record profits. Nearly everything the company does makes news these days.
"In some ways, it's a compliment to how people see our company," said Whole Foods co-CEO Walter Robb. "I do think we're a leader in the food industry, and people look to us in that respect. And so when we take a step or make a decision, it gets reported on."
Andrew Wolf, an analyst with BB&T Capital Markets, said the challenges Whole Foods is dealing with aren't surprising. "The bigger you get, the bigger the target — whether it's the unions or attorneys or civil rights groups or anybody," he said.
A handful of incidents in the past year have challenged the company — both in protecting its reputation and in deciding whether its policies might have to evolve as it grows.
This summer, the company faced fallout over allegations that it punished two Hispanic employees in New Mexico for objecting to a policy restricting the use of Spanish at work.
While Robb and other company officials said the incident was a misunderstanding, the company did revise its language guidelines after an outcry from activists.
Robb said the New Mexico story was partly the product of a "gotcha culture" in the media, but he acknowledged that the company's prominence factored in.
Incidents like the language controversy in New Mexico can happen to any company because it's impossible to control all the actions of thousands of employees, said Wolf, the analyst with BB&T Capital Markets.
"You can't control them all," he said. "The best you can do is hire them well and train them well, and even then some of them are going to say stuff that's going to be embarrassing for the company."
When Whole Foods opened a store in Detroit in June, it got more media coverage than any other store opening in the company's history, Robb said. The company was hailed for opening a store in an area where people don't have immediate access to fresh foods — but at the same time there was criticism that Whole Foods' prices were too expensive for lower-income residents.
That perception that Whole Foods is too expensive and caters to a largely affluent demographic continues to be a challenge for the company, Wolf said.
The company has worked hard to improve its value and accessibility, Robb said.
"I welcome the question, because it gives us a chance to have a dialogue about this myth that if you eat healthy it has to be expensive, or that eating healthy is only for certain people," he said. "That's just bull."
Whole Foods has received pushback at times for the political views of some of its top leaders. In 2009, company co-founder and co-CEO John Mackey made national news — and sparked scattered boycotts — when he wrote an op-ed piece criticizing President Obama's health care plan.
Robb said the fallout over Mackey's health care comments made them more careful as company leaders.
"I think we both recognized that — being a public company CEO — that times have changed and it isn't so much about what you individually think as you're representing the company and you have lots of shareholders and stakeholders and that has to be taken into account," he said. "So I think both of us are a lot more careful about when we speak, that we're speaking on behalf of the company."


text:
Equity Impacts of Transportation Improvements On Core and Peripheral Cities
The aim of this paper is to assess the short-term impact of transportation improvements on the reduction of socio-economic disparities between core and peripheral cities. Data used in the analysis was extracted from the 1995 Israel Census. The methodology applied in the study was to estimate discrete choice models in an attempt to identify key variables affecting commuting decisions. Policy simulations are employed to illustrate the effect of diminishing spatial friction on wage convergence between poor southern towns and affluent core cities. The empirical evidence suggests that transportation improvements, especially in the form of introducing new rail links in underserved cities, could significantly contribute to the alleviation of spatial wage disparities between core and peripheral cities.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Volume (Year): 1 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 153-182
|Contact details of provider:
| Web page: http://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu
More information through EDIRC
No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jtralu:0013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Arlene Mathison)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.


text:
VNTG Crochet PATTERN Large Doily Tablecloth Centerpiece
Patterns Crochet for sale PATTERN to Make Tea Table Cover or Huge Doily Centerpiece Vintage Crochet Pattern A Digitally Cleaned and Restored Reprint This Listing is for
Large Table Doily Free Crochet & Hairpin Lace Pattern
Combine roll stitch crochet and hairpin laceto create this beautiful large round doily as a centerpiece for a table. You can make this in a single colour or
Ravelry: Large Round Elegant Doily Crochet Pattern – pdf pattern
Large Round Elegant Crocheted Doily Would you like to see 3 projects made from this pattern and much more? join Ravelry now What am I missing?
Ravelry: Large Pineapple Doily pattern by American Thread Company
From "Suggestions for Fairs and Bazaars," Star Book No. 98, The American Thread Company, 1953. Materials: "GEM" Crochet Cotton, Article 35, size 30: 2 balls White
Doily Patterns, Crochet Patterns, Crocheting :Discount Crafts
Doily Patterns, Crochet Patterns, Crocheting. OnlineCraftsStore.com features discount arts and crafts supplies, wood crafts, and crafts for kids and all your craft project.
Large Oval Centerpiece Doily crochet PATTERN | eBay
Large Oval Centerpiece Doily crochet PATTERN in Crafts , Needlecrafts Yarn , Crocheting Knitting , Patterns , Doilies |eBay
Doily Crochet Pattern | Crochet Patterns
Now Available On eBay "Doily Crochet Pattern" Click To Bid – Bid To Win. This site will be authorized simply by eBay to offer exactly the product you were looking for.
Crochet Pattern: Large Hipster Doily
This pattern was originally published with a finished size of 7″ in diameter. Upon request I've changed this pattern to a larger sized doily at 10″ in diameter.


text:
Vital Theatre Company Presents: 'Pinkalicious, The Musical' - 45 Bleecker
Hours: Saturdays and Sundays at 11am
Ages: TOD,YE
Price: $29.50
45 Bleecker St. - 212-579-0528
West Village, NY 10023
Description: Pinkalicious can't stop eating pink cupcakes, despite warnings from her parents. Her pink indulgence lands her at the doctor's office with Pinkititis, an affliction that turns her pink from head to toe - a dream come true for this pink loving enthusiast. But when her hue goes too far, only Pinkalicious can figure out a way to get out of her predicament.


text:
Glacier Bay Alaska: Star Princess Cruise Review by coopco
Overall Member Rating
Glacier Bay Alaska
Destination: Alaska
Embarkation: Seattle
Since there were four of us, when we got to the airport and called a taxi, I requested a limo. The dispatcher was going to send an SUV but when I asked if it was possible to get a stretch limo since we had four people and lots of luggage, he said that was fine. The kids really loved More starting their vacation in a limo and it was the same cost as a taxi/SUV ($50 from airport to Seattle Center area).
That evening we took the ferry to Bainbridge as a cheap way to get a tour of Puget Sound. My husband is retired Air Force so it was $24 for all of us ($7.70 adults, $6.20 youths, $3.85 military). We had timed it to go out when it was light and return after dark. It was beautiful seeing the city lights upon return. The only downside was all the stores were closed when we got to Bainbridge so if you have enough time, you might want to plan on spending the afternoon in Bainbridge. The return ferry home is free so you only pay one way. You can catch a taxi right across the street from the ferry building but ask for their rates before getting in. It was an $11 fare to get to the ferry from the hotel and $15 getting back because the return taxi never started the meter.
The next day we rented a car from Budget Downtown Seattle #2. They will pick you up from your hotel if they arent busy. We went to the Museum of Flight, which we really enjoyed. From there we went to Slims Last Chance Chili (highlighted on Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives). Since we have kids, we actually went to the BBQ place right next door. Kids arent allowed in Slims since its a bar but since both places belong to the same owner, they will let you order from the Slims menu at the BBQ place and vice versa. The kids really enjoyed their award winning BBQ meal. I had the Chili Verde and my husband had the Texas chili from Slims. His was much better than mine. We got there at 3:30 and the BBQ place closes at 4 pm so keep that in mind if you plan to visit. After Slims we went to the Ballard Locks and that was really interesting to see if youve never been to locks before. We tried to go up the Space Needle that evening but only one elevator was working so the wait was too long. You might plan for something like that if you must go up the Space Needle. We were able to go the next day, no problem. We were in the 8:30 pm group up and stayed until dark to see the city in daylight and at night. You can buy refreshments (including wine and beer) and they have seating so you can relax while waiting for nightfall without having to go to the restaurant.
Our last day in Seattle before the cruise included a tour of the Public Market where I got discounted tickets prior from Groupon. It was a great tour highly recommend it if you have time. Then we went to the first Starbucks to buy souvenirs, did the obligatory Piroshky Piroshky and Beechers Mac and Cheese - plan on having time for standing in line at those places. I also bought a beautiful bouquet of flowers at Pike Place Market. They have $5, $10 and $15 beautiful bouquets. I bought a vase at the grocery store by our hotel but noticed others were carrying their bouquets without vases so Im not sure what they did onboard. If you are by Pike Place Market, I recommend this as it brighten our (little inside) cabin so much and smelled awesome! We also visited the Klondike Gold Rush Museum (so my daughter could get her National Parks Stamp). Unfortunately we didnt have much time here since it was difficult getting a taxi since Paul McCartney was in town for a concert. Yes, my 14 year old daughter did ask, Who is Paul McCartney? when we mentioned this is why we had to wait so long for a taxi. We had dinner at Ivars Seafood since it was convenient and Im so glad we did. Everything was very tasty. Then we took the Spooked in Seattle tour, another Groupon deal. We really enjoyed it and I highly recommend it if you are looking to please adults and older kids.
Embarkation: We took the shuttle to Pier 91 on Saturday morning since we had too much luggage to fit in a taxi. We got there around 10:15 but it took a long time for the shuttle to get to the drop off point since passengers from the previous cruise were waiting in the same area. m glad we arrived early because we were able to get seats to wait for embarkation. If you dont get there early, you will need to stand in line to wait. They started embarkation at 11:45 but we had to wait a while in line. Our rooms were ready when we boarded. I think it was about 12:15 when we got onboard.
After dropping off our carry-ons, we went straight to Portofino Dining Room for lunch. It was an enjoyable lunch, much better than fighting the crowds at the buffet. Some of our luggage was at the room after lunch so we were able to get unpacked before the muster drill around 3 pm.
If youre a smoker, Shooters Bar right outside the Princess Theater allows smoking, even cigars. Also the area all the way aft on Deck 14 offers an uncrowded place to see the views and a nearby bar and smoking area. Its a great place to hang out for sail away.
Juneau: We pre-booked an excursion with Allen Marine to Tracy Arm/Sawyer Glacier. Allen Marine did a fabulous job and made the excursion enjoyable but after seeing Glacier Bay, we felt Sawyer Glacier was no comparison to Marjerie Glacier so it really wasnt worth the money (basically $200 per person). I think I would have preferred to book a whale watching excursion once off the ship for a lot less money. We did see Orcas on our excursion and plenty of wild life and Allen Marine was fabulous. Im just not sure it was worth the $800 for a family of four.
Skagway: We booked the White Pass Yukon Railway train/bus with Frontier Excursions and Adventures. They were fabulous and made sure we got on the train early and sat on the left side for the best views up to Fraser. I thought it was great to take a small van back (eight of us total) stopping at sights on the way to take pictures and jumping in the van before large buses got in front of us. Im glad we did this excursion but again I felt it was over-priced for a family of four ($500 total) so I doubt Id do it again. If you must check this off your list of things to do (which you will enjoy if you do it), Id highly recommend Frontier Excursion and Adventures. They also offer tours that dont include the train that are more reasonably priced.
Ketchikan: We didnt book an excursion since we were in port such a short time (and I didnt want to get up early since, after all, we were on vacation). We really enjoyed walking around town, seeing the salmon spawning and having time to shop. If you like to fish, Id imagine youd have a good time on a fishing excursion since there were a ton of salmon you could see in the creeks. I think if we go back, Id plan a fishing excursion and even get up early for it, which is a lot coming from someone who enjoys sleeping in on vacation!
Victoria: We took at taxi downtown ($9) and enjoyed walking around and shopping. There were plenty of street performers to entertain you. My husband loved the city. Its beautiful and worth seeing so Id highly recommend getting off the ship even though its tempting to stay onboard with such a late/short port time.
Debarkation: I was pleased with how Princess handles this. We needed to vacate our cabin by 8 am and there werent those frequent annoying announcements. We requested the 9:30 time group and were given 9:10 which worked out fine. We had breakfast in the dining room and headed over to the Vista Lounge around 9:00. Shortly thereafter our group was called. Our flight was at 2:30 and I wished I had made it a little earlier, maybe around 1 pm or so.
General thoughts on Princess: This was our first seven day cruise and the length was perfect. We have done three and four day cruises prior, which are too short. It was nice to have sea days to relax. And since we had spent three days prior sightseeing in Seattle, I was ready to go home when we did. The staff onboard was very friendly and service was great. However, I think the food and entertainment was not as good as Royal Caribbean and Carnival, which I found surprising.
It was our first time trying Anytime Dining, which was perfect for us. We enjoy having the same wait staff so you can get to know them and they can get to know you. Since we dine late, we were able to go between 7:45 and 9:00 pm and always get the same table/waiters. It was like having the best of both worlds. Service was fantastic and we tipped both our waiter and assistant waiter extra on the last evening for their efforts. You can get envelopes at the Pursers desk. Out of curiosity, we asked our waiter what his wage was that last evening once we had gotten to know him. Waiters get paid $50 per month (before tips) so please keep that in mind if you get great service from your waiter. We even learned waiters dont even get the entire 15% automatic gratuity on your bar tab. The company takes half and the waiter gets the other half, which he splits with his assistant.
Despite the food/entertainment not being what I expected, Im positive we will cruise with Princess again. My husband and I are both veterans and we appreciate the Princess veterans benefits. Also I like the idea of having laundry facilities onboard. And Princess has other things the other cruise lines dont offer, such as afternoon tea, Scholarship at Sea, and a generous wine program where you can bring onboard as many bottles as you want as long as you pay a $15 corkage fee. This allows you to pair your favorite wine with dinner. Also the onboard naturalist was fabulous and it was great having the National Parks Rangers onboard in Glacier Bay.
All in all, we had a fabulous time even the hard to please teenagers who couldnt wait to go to the Teen Center every day. As a final couple notes, I had concerns prior to the cruise about our cabin, D123. I had read it was noisy because of the crew stairs nearby and noise from the Princess Theater below. We had no problems with noise and even though I brought ear plugs, we never used them. We never heard noise from the theater and we were in the room getting ready for dinner during the early show times. I only heard noises from the crew stairs a couple times and it wasnt bothersome. And lastly, I had booked the July 20th cruise because I had read it was a good time of year for the best weather. We had fabulous weather in all the ports and felt so lucky. Although it rained for short periods while onboard, we couldnt have asked for better weather and I never once opened my umbrella the whole trip. What a fabulous vacation! Thank you Princess! Less
Published 08/08/13
Cabin review: LD123
Star Princess D123 - I was concerned about this cabin because I read it was noisy from the nearby crew stairs and noise coming up from the Princess Theater. It wasn't a problem at all. We only heard someone on the stairs a couple times and never heard noise from the theater. I brought ear plugs but never used them. If you get seasick, you might want to opt for something further aft. You could feel quite a bit of movement in open seas although no one in our cabin found it bothersome.
Port and Shore Excursions
Boat Tour
Allen Marine did a fabulous job on this Tracy Arm/Sawyer Glacier excursion. We saw killer whales, eagles, seals, beautiful waterfalls, etc. Sawyer Glacier was beautiful. They have a naturalist onboard and even scoop up a piece of glacier for you to feel/see up close. My only complaint is the cost is pretty hefty for a family of four.
We loved seeing all the salmon in the creeks and walking around town. It was nice to have time to shop leisurely.
White Pass Scenic Railway
The scenery is breathtaking on the train up to Fraser. Make sure you sit on the left on the way up. We took a small van with eight people back to the ship with Frontier Excursions and Adventures. They did a fabulous job and it was great having a small group and make stops along the way back.
Beautiful city and a short, inexpensive taxi ride to get downtown ($9).
Read Cruise Critic's Star Princess Review >>
Disappointed but still ok
7 Night Alaska Tracy Arm Fjord...
Fun time with helpful informat...
Nice ship for an Alaskan cruis...
Not what we expected
Nice but nothing particularly ...
Bland food and unpleasant staf...
Fun time with helpful informat...
Sponsored Links


text: Home CCO David Lubars David Lubars CCO Title Medium Date AT&T: U-verse Police Drama Video Aug 07, 2014 Foot Locker: Harden Soul Music Video Video Aug 15, 2013 James Harden Wears His Shirt Open So You Can See His Chest, for Foot Locker Video Aug 15, 2013 Turn Sax-Playing Buzzkillers Back into Your Friends with Snickers Video Jul 02, 2013 Foot Locker: Neighborhood Kids Video Feb 07, 2013 Snickers: Coach Video Jan 28, 2013 FedEx: Remotely Video Jan 25, 2013 FedEx: Social Video Jan 25, 2013 FedEx: Last Minute Video Nov 09, 2012 FedEx: Campout Video Nov 09, 2012 FedEx: Santa Video Nov 09, 2012 Snickers: You're Not You When You're Hungry-Election Edition Print (image) Nov 05, 2012 FedEx: Arnold Palmer Video Aug 01, 2012 General Electric: Measure Video Jul 27, 2012 Game of Thrones: DeThroned - Teaser Interactive (video) Mar 09, 2012 Game of Thrones: DeThroned - Sample Verdict Interactive (video) Mar 09, 2012 CCO Worldwide Title Medium Date Twix: Right Twix Taste Montage Video Mar 10, 2016 Left Twix or Right Twix? America Will Decide Video Mar 10, 2016 Snickers Designs Ridiculous Products for Your Combined Hunger Symptoms Video Mar 07, 2016 Sports Illustrated's Bikini Issue Cover Is All Messed Up, Thanks to Snickers Print (Slideshow) Feb 17, 2016 Foot Locker: Borrowed Video Feb 10, 2016 Kevin Hart Unveils a Ridiculous Fashion Line in Latest Foot Locker Ads Video Feb 10, 2016 Art Directors Club: Cousins Video Jan 25, 2016 Art Directors Club: Selfie Video Jan 25, 2016 Just What Do Sex Toys Have to Do With ADC Awards? Video Jan 25, 2016 Snickers: Crisper - Figure Drawing Video Jan 11, 2016 Does Hunger Ever Make You 'Dimpatient?' Snickers' Ads for Crisper Warn of Combined Symptoms Video Jan 11, 2016 GE Capital: Columbia Forest Products Video May 12, 2014 GE Capital: Composites Horizons Video May 12, 2014 AT&T: Sing Better Business Video Apr 10, 2014 AT&T: Sing Food Truck Video Apr 10, 2014 AT&T: Sing Anthem Video Apr 10, 2014 AT&T Launches New Brand Platform 'Mobilizing Your World' Video Apr 10, 2014 Lowe's Gives Spring Commercial an NCAA Twist Video Apr 04, 2014 Brown M&M Meets Geico's Gecko (and Camel) in Co-Branded Spot Video Mar 04, 2014 Godzilla is Actually a Really Fun Guy When He's Not Hungry, According to Snickers Video Feb 28, 2014 General Electric Uses a Kid to Explain its Business to You Video Feb 06, 2014 Kids Foot Locker: Buzzer Beater Video Feb 05, 2014 James Harden Puts on an Anthony Davis Disguise in Latest Foot Locker Ad Video Feb 05, 2014 Bud Light: Don Video Jan 20, 2014 Bud Light: Reggie Mic Video Jan 20, 2014 Bud Light Taps Arnold Schwarzenegger, Don Cheadle For Super Bowl Video Jan 20, 2014 Bud Light: Arnold Warmup Video Jan 20, 2014 Chairman/CCO Title Medium Date AT&T: Daybreak - Trailer Video Jun 06, 2012 AT&T: Daybreak - Jack Boxer Teaser Video Jun 06, 2012 Chief Creative Officer Title Medium Date FedEx: Solutions That Matter website Interactive (image) Feb 02, 2012 Chief Creative Officer Title Medium Date Foot Locker: Hat for Fishing Video Dec 12, 2012 Foot Locker: Carmelo Video Dec 07, 2012 Foot Locker: Ghost Hunter Video Dec 07, 2012 GE: Journey Video Nov 27, 2012 HBO: Office Gift Exchange Video Nov 19, 2012 Chief Creative Officer Worldwide Title Medium Date AT&T Kicks Off Major Campaign Encompassing Smart Cars, Connected Homes Video Jan 11, 2016 Toys 'R' Us Tugs at Your Heartsrings in a Holiday Ad That's About More Than Gifts Video Dec 02, 2015 HP: Epic Battle Video Nov 20, 2015 R2-D2 Is On a Romantic Mission in HP's Star Wars-Themed Campaign Video Nov 20, 2015 Chief Creative Officer, Worldwide Title Medium Date Bacardi Moves From Heritage to a House Party Road Trip Video Oct 12, 2015 Watch James Harden Sing 'I'm a Little Teapot' in Foot Locker's Tweet Challenge Interactive (video) Oct 09, 2015 Precocious Girls Prank Unsuspecting Adults in Cute Barbie Campaign Video Oct 09, 2015 James Harden Will Pay Dearly If He Misses a Shot in Foot Locker's Outrageous Stunt Video Sep 24, 2015 FedEx: Open Floor Plan Video Jun 01, 2015 FedEx: Hotshots Video Jun 01, 2015 Why Saving Money on FedEx Could Make Life Awkward for Mom and Dad Video Jun 01, 2015 FedEx: Bed & Breakfast Video Jun 01, 2015 These NYC Tourists Want More Than Just a Selfie With Jason Sudeikis Video Apr 21, 2015 GE Asks What Would Happen If Light Could Seek Dark in Inspiring New Ad Video Jul 16, 2014 Visa Pits Peace-Loving Nobel Laureates Against Each Other in World Cup Spot Video Jun 12, 2014 Little Girls Speak Out In Video For Sandberg's Ban Bossy Initiative Video Mar 10, 2014 Guinness Tells the Heartwarming Story of Twin Olympian Sisters Video Jan 28, 2014 Global Chief Creative Officer Title Medium Date Worldwide CCO Title Medium Date Visa Channels Amelia Earhart to Celebrate Olympic Debut of Women's Ski-Jumping Video Jan 13, 2014 Worldwide Chief Creative Officer Title Medium Date Lowe's: Live Vines (Slideshow) Print (Slideshow) Aug 03, 2015 Lowe's 'Fix in Six' Vines Hit the Real World in Windows of New York Store Print (video) Aug 03, 2015 GE Wants to Protect This Freaky, Adorable Creature Video Aug 29, 2014


text:
Friday, April 18, 1997
Joey Thompson
p. A19.
I rest my case
Pardon clouds probe of abusePolice are interviewing some 300 adults, one-time boarders at a high school in Inuvik, N.W.T.
Vancouver police are working with RCMP to track down hundreds of students who bunked in an Inuvik school dorm during the 1960s and '70s.
The file could balloon into the largest child sex investigation ever run in the Northwest Territories.
I'm told Mounties, with the help of city police, will be questioning up to 300 Inuit and Dene adults who lived in Grollier Hall while attending high school in their teens.
"It could become another Maple Leaf Gardens-type thing," a source told me.
"We're going to be speaking to hundreds of people."
Most of the 14-to-16-year-olds had homes in the 10 outlying communities, far from the region's public school. They camped out in the Inuvik hall during the school year.
Police first got wind of dubious goings-on at the student residence when a former pupil complained two months ago.
Now their biggest task is locating the other students, adults in their 30s and 40s. Many left the area years ago.
The suspect, a former supervisor at the residence/hostel, has not yet been charged but I'm told he was also a justice of the peace back then who handled some provincial family court matters.
What's more, he has already been in prison once for molesting a lad who lived in the dorm.
But police can't count the 1979 sex conviction; they have to pretend it never happened.
That's because the National Parole Board pardoned the suspect, now in his 50s and living in Vancouver, after he proved he had been conviction-free for five years.
The board wiped his slate clean as it has done with an estimated 87,981 other Canadian offenders since 1991.
The Criminal Records Act makes if fairly easy to get a pardon. If you've been convicted of a serious (indictable) offence you have to prove you've been good for five years, and three if you've been rapped for a summary (less serious) conviction.
Once you have been pardoned, your criminal record no longer exists and your file is sealed -- in Canada anyway.
Federal laws prohibit employers within federal jurisdiction from popping the question: "Do you have, or have you ever had a criminal record?"
On the provincial level, the onus is on the individual to answer the question truthfully. Municipal law-enforcement agencies are also expected to lock away a pardoned person's past.
Now, if a guy is convicted of an additional indictable offence, he automatically loses the pardon. And his record is reinstated.
(Someone convicted of a less serious crime could also lose it but that's for the board to decide.)
My point is: What guarantee do we have that the info about the previous pardoned crimes would reach Crown counsel in time to inform the sentencing judge?
Furthermore, what safeguards are in place to ensure that a subsequent conviction is even brought to the parole board's attention?
And how long does that take?
Ottawa media director Sheila Watkins was kind enough to fax me a chart on how benevolent the NPB has been to offenders.
Last year the board forgave 10,454 offenders who committed some type of serious (indictable) crime; 11,000 in 1995, 18,668 the year before that, and so on.
NPB doesn't have a breakdown of the types of crimes, or from which provinces the requests came.
Watkins said they denied pardons to 947 offenders during the past six years, which counts for less than two per cent of the applications processed.
She said the majority have stayed clean. A tiny number, about one per cent, had to have their pardons pulled because of a subsequent conviction.
"A pardon is a way of rewarding the offender for paying his debt and for becoming a law-abiding citizen."
If you have a comment or column idea call Joey Thompson at 732-2119 or write care of The Province.
|More about "kiddie" porn...
Created: April 19, 1997
Last modified: July 2, 1997
Commercial Sex Information Service
Box 3075, Vancouver, BC V6B 3X6
Tel: +1 (604) 488-0710
Email: firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
Latest question:
How do you think the new GigE standards will influence the machine vision industry?
Respond or ask your question now!
The CIEFFE MPEG4 Main Profile is able to deliver four streams of video simultaneously with different quality and resolution. With the H.264 algorithm CIEFFE can also stream video with very low bandwidth (less than 512Kbit/s) and DVD quality.
"We are excited about CIEFFE's adoption of Pixim's technology. CIEFFE has developed an excellent solution for the networked video surveillance market, integrating advanced capabilities such as Pixim's DPS imaging technology, H.264 compression, and CIEFFE's video management architecture," said Joe Montalbo, President and CEO of Pixim. "CIEFFE's focus on complete network solutions will make the NETTUNO camPX a great fit for demanding and complex surveillance needs."
CIEFFE will market the NETTUNO camPX to all sectors that require quality, performance and reliability, including airports, casinos, banks, retail, city controls and money count surveillance systems.
For more information on the NETTUNO camPX visit: www.cieffe.com
Customers shipping Pixim chipsets in their security camera products include: Baxall, CIEFFE, Dallmeier electronic, EverFocus, Tyco Fire & Security, GE Security, General Solutions, Honeywell, Ikegami, Pelco, Sunell, JVC, ChipER, Eagle Technology, Videor Technical, Smartvue, Verint, and Electronics Line USA.
About Pixim
Pixim Inc. has developed imaging technology and products that revolutionize the way video cameras capture and process images. Pixim's patented Digital Pixel System� (DPS) silicon and software technology produces superior pictures under a wide variety of lighting conditions. For more information or to purchase Pixim's products, visit our website: www.pixim.com or call Pixim's headquarters in Mountain View, CA., (650) 605-1107.


text:
Twitter Girl of the Week – Kayla Collins [PHOTOS]
Introducing the week's Twitter Girl of the Week – Kayla Collins. Kayla is a Playboy Playmate and was "Playmate of the Month" for August 2008. She was discovered when she was just 19 years old on Myspace. More on Kayla after the jump.
Follow Kayla on her Twitter account. Now, the most important part of this post…the pics (thanks to Twitter)!


text:
Links from here will take you into different sections of the site which have many images that have either been unused on the programme makers own web site or are part of an adventure all their own!
Location filming is a global business - it takes us all over the place!
The only plug-in you'll need for these gallery pages is Quicktime. Download from Apple.
This area is still very much under construction so please call back regularly to view the latest developments.


text:
My son took a picture of me jumping the cemetery wall. Do it again, he said, as if I'd got out too fast. Pretend you're really climbing. In the retake my lazy eye is half shut, and the other is smiling or crying.
sign up to receive a new poem-a-day in your inbox
sign up
Acts of Mind
What's funny about this place
is us regulars coming in with our different
accoutrements, mine usually the little void
of space I call honey, days
I can barely get through I'm laughing so hard,
see? In the back a woman squeezes oranges,
someone presses the fresh white bread
into communion wafers or party favors.
In the window the chickens rotate blissfully,
questioning nothing—
Sometimes I flirt with the cashier, just improvising,
the way birds land all in a hurry on the streetlamp across the street,
which stays warm even on cold nights.
Guillaume says humor is sadness
and he's awfully pretty.
What do they put in this coffee? Men?
No wonder I get a little high. Remember
when we didn't have sex on the ferris wheel,
oh that was a blast,
high, high above the Tuileries!
Copyright © 2013 by Catherine Barnett. Used with permission of the author. This poem appeared in Poem-A-Day on October 7, 2013.
Copyright © 2013 by Catherine Barnett. Used with permission of the author. This poem appeared in Poem-A-Day on October 7, 2013.
Catherine Barnett
Poet, editor, and teacher Catherine Barnett was born in Washington, D.C. and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area. She studied at Princeton University and at the Warren Wilson MFA Program for Writers.
Barnett is the author of two collections of poetry: Into Perfect Spheres Such Holes Are Pierced (Alice James Books, 2004) and The Game of Boxes (Graywolf Press, 2012), which was the recipient of the 2012 James Laughlin Award from the Academy of American Poets.


text:
Emma slept a record 2 hr nap today, so whilst I was burning her lunch (the house stinks), I thought I'd whip up a hot water bottle cover. My old one was about 15 yrs old, and a tad manky! This one took me literally 20min (+ photo time), so no excuse to make one this weekend.
You will need-
Your hot water bottle
An old felted jumper, blanket or wool felt
A large piece of paper
Sewing machine and thread
Step 1
Make a template by tracing around your hot water bottle with a 1cm allowance (approx) this allows for filling roomStep 2
Cut out your template and lay onto felt - I've used a sleeve of a jumperStep 3
Cut around your template with an extra 1cm all the way around for your seam allowance. This will be your front Step 4
To make the back. You will need an opening in the back to insert your hot water bottle. To do this overlap 2 pieces of felt (with straight edges) by about 2 inches. Pin. Lay your template on top and cut around with 1cm seam allowance
Step 5
Here you can see the front and back. I've sewn some spots onto the front to add some interest. You can embellish any way you like, but make sure you do it at this stage. Now to sew the 2 sides together you need to match up the pieces 'right' sides (outsides)facing in. Sew with a straight stitch all the way around (1cm seam allowance) paying particular care where the back flap overlaps. You may want to sew over this part twice as it will get a little stress. Step 6
Trim away any seam bulk and clip inside curves to make turning easier. Turn inside out...and you're done!