text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|21 Sep 2010
|Filing date
|26 Sep 2006
|Priority date
|26 Sep 2006
|Fee status
|Publication number
|Christopher Amidon, Alfredo Issa, Richard Walsh
|Original Assignee
|Qurio Holdings, Inc.
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (360), Non-Patent Citations (41), Referenced by (83), Classifications (8), Legal Events (2)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
The increased availability of network-capable computing devices has led to a wide variety of communication options for users. Users can exchange messages and content through various communication systems including e-mail, instant messaging, chat rooms, bulletin and discussion boards, file sharing applications, and blogs and other web sites. For example, instant messaging systems such as Internet Relay Chat (IRC), ICQ, AOL Instant Messenger, Yahoo! Messenger, and Microsoft's MSN Messenger are widely used by many users on the Internet. Similar systems are available for messaging within local networks, as well.
Various arrangements of the previously-listed (and other) communication systems have been proposed for use in so-called "social networking" systems. Generally speaking, a "social network" refers to a group of persons or other entities ("members") linked to one another through one or more types of social connections. Social networks are also commonly referred to as "friend-of-a-friend" networks, although social networks may of course include or consist entirely of entities linked by social connections other than friendship. For example, a social network can include members linked to one another by connections including common friendship, place or field of employment, place of education, place of residence, membership in a club or other group, or common hobbies or topical interests. Many social networking systems attempt to provide computer-based tools for maintaining, enhancing, and creating social networks.
For example, social networking web sites provide users with web space to create a profile and link to various other users designated as "friends." See, for example, http://www.myspace.com and http://www.friendster.com. Users of such sites can post messages and other content to web pages accessible to various parties of their choosing (for example, to "friends only" or to the public at large). Social networking sites may also utilize instant messaging and online chat rooms that allow for near-instantaneous communication between users.
Recent developments in the field of social networking and online communication have been directed towards providing tools for users to create, manage, and explore social networks. For instance, mapping of social networks has been proposed based on correlating contact lists. A user can then explore various social networks of which the user is a part by using the resulting map, diagram, or other representation. For example, a user may use social networking tools to discover that friends of one or more of the user's friends (heretofore unknown to the user) may share common interests. The user may then pursue a closer relationship with the newly found friends-of-a-friend, for example, by discussing topics and sharing content of common interest with both the user's newly-found and original friends. As a further example, tools such as Huminity (http://www.huminity.com) may "traverse" a social network based on buddy or contact lists and provide a representation of the social network.
Social networking sites (and other tools) may provide some indication of changes in social networks over time. For example, as noted above, a social networking site may provide a representation such as a diagram or list of a user's friends, colleagues and other social network members. The social networking site may even update the diagram or list frequently. For instance, the social networking site or system may nearly-instantaneously update the user's social network when the user sends a message to a new friend or contact or when the user deletes a friend or contact.
Many social networking sites and other tools may provide an indicator as to whether a user is online or otherwise available. For example, instant messaging applications frequently provide "buddy lists" that indicate whether a contact is online, online-but-idle, or offline. Some instant messaging applications further indicate when a contact is preparing a message. For example, the open-source messaging application Gaim (http://gaim.sourceforge.net) provides an indicator in a user's instant message window when the other party to the messaging session is typing a message.
Generally speaking, tools that allow users to analyze and explore social networks have been time-limited in that most display static representations of the social network without providing data on the extent to which the social network is "live" or active. Thus, it is difficult for a user to determine whether or how the members of the user's social network are interacting in real time. While various presently-existing systems provide indicators of online status or activity, such systems may not necessarily provide information to the user about the existence and extent of such activity across the social network.
For example, a user may wish to discuss a particular topic with friends or other contacts within his social network. Present systems, such as those including chat rooms for example, allow for collaborative, topic-based discussions. However, to participate in such a discussion, the user needs to seek out a particular chat room and ascertain whether desired contacts are in the chat room. Alternatively, the user may create a chat room regarding the desired topic, but then must locate and invite desired users and screen out undesired users and otherwise assemble the chat room or discussion group.
As a further example, if a user wishes to share content with persons in a social network, the user must first determine if such persons are online and wish to view the content, which takes time and can become burdensome. For example, if a user wants to immediately share a new video, sending an email or other invitation ensures a delayed sharing experience, while initiating multiple instant messaging sessions quickly becomes tedious. Furthermore, depending upon the make up of a particular social network, the user may be unaware of whom to invite. For instance, the user's social network may include close friends and a far-flung network of co-workers. Although the user may be aware of friends that are interested in the new video, the user may not be aware that a co-worker would also enjoy viewing the video unless the user undertakes a certain amount of investigation. Even with presently-existing social networking tools that could reveal the co-worker's preferences, such investigation may entail too large a delay for the user to undertake, thus depriving the user of the fullest social networking online experience.
Therefore, a need exists for a system that allows users to discover, create, and manage active communications within and throughout social networks.
Objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to one of skill in the art upon careful review of the disclosure. Such objects and advantages include providing systems and methods for users to discover, create, explore and manage active communications in one or more social networks.
As used herein, a social network circuit comprises at least some members of a social network. However each member in a social network circuit is connected to at least one other member in the circuit by way of a live communication link. For example, a live communication link may comprise an ongoing instant messaging conversation between two or more parties. In other embodiments, a live communications link may comprise a file sharing session, an email conversation, blog postings and comments, video and/or audio chat sessions, or other video, textual, and/or audio connections, including telephone connections. Communication links may be achieved in any suitable fashion, including by wired and/or wireless links.
As will be discussed in further detail herein, a communication link can be characterized as "live" when it is in actual use, but also (optionally) for a predetermined time period immediately following use. Furthermore, a communication link may be declared as "live" at one or more predetermined times, either automatically or in response to user scheduling data.
The remainder of this disclosure uses the terms "potential social network circuit" and "active social network circuit." "Potential" circuits comprise any social network circuit that meets the basic criteria of a social network circuit (i.e. each member in the circuit is connected to at least one other member by way of a live communication link). Depending upon various criteria that will be discussed in further detail below, certain members of a "potential" social network circuit may be included in or excluded from certain circuits derived from the potential social network circuit. Therefore, for purposes of clarity, the term "active" social network circuit is used to denote a social network circuit comprising at least some members of a potential social network circuit who meet one or more parameters or criteria.
One of skill in the art will recognize that, while an active social network circuit may comprise a subset of a potential social network circuit, it is entirely feasible for all members of a potential social network circuit to be members of an active social network circuit. Furthermore, it will be apparent that a single potential social network circuit may give rise to a plurality of active social network circuits depending upon what parameters are used.
This disclosure refers generally to "users" participating in and receiving information regarding social network circuits. The term "user" is meant to broadly include not only an individual, but also other entities, such as groups of individuals and organizations when treatable as a single unit.
A method of administrating one or more social network circuits can include receiving session information from at least one client included within a social network. The session information can include data identifying at least one communication link between the client and at least one other client in the social network. The method further includes tracking, based on data including the session information, at least one potential social network circuit comprising a plurality of clients, wherein each client in the potential social network circuit is connected to at least one other client in the circuit by a live communication link. Tracking may include storing, in computer-readable form, data defining the at least one social network circuit.
For example, a social network may include a first, second, third, and fourth client. Session information may be received from the first client, indicating a connection between the first and third clients; from the second client, indicating a communication link between the second and fourth client; and from the third client, indicating a communication link between the second client and the third client. The social network circuit can include all of the first, second, third, and fourth clients.
The method may further include providing information identifying the at least one potential social network circuit to one or more of the clients included in the potential social network circuit. As noted above, a communication link may be identified as live at the time a communication occurs between at least two clients. The link may be additionally identified as live for a predetermined time after a communication occurs between the at least two clients. One or more potential social network circuits may be tracked in real time or substantially in real time (i.e. in real time allowing for network delays).
The method may further include defining one or more active social network circuits based on one or more potential social network circuits. Such circuits may be defined based on at least one parameter defined by at least one client in the potential social network circuit. The clients in the active social network circuit may comprise all of the clients in a potential social network circuit or a subset of clients in a potential social network. The parameter(s) may be provided in a request defined by a requesting client in a potential social network circuit, for instance. Furthermore, the parameter(s) may be defined by one or more clients as preferences regarding desired social network circuit participants or conditions upon the client's participation in an active circuit, for example. Alternatively, an active social network circuit may be formed automatically, for example, by matching parameters of clients in a potential social network circuit.
Suitable parameters can include, but are not limited to one or more of the following, either alone or in combination: particular discussion or content-sharing topics, predetermined time periods of desired participation in active circuits, specified demographics or other user characteristics for circuit participants, specified content type or subject matter for file sharing, identification of particular clients for participation or exclusion, or social network parameters, such as maximum or minimum degrees of separation.
A social network circuit server can comprise one or more computing devices configured to access stored instructions that direct the computing device to perform activities, the activities including receiving session data from at least one social network circuit client application and tracking at least one potential social network circuit based on identifying at least one live communication link connecting a plurality of clients. The server may be further configured to provide identification identifying one or more potential social network circuits to at least one of the clients. The server may be further configured to access configuration parameters defined by at least one client and define a social network circuit based on such parameters.
Client applications may be implemented as computer software products. A computer software product may comprise a computer readable medium embodying executable instructions, the instructions directing a computing device to perform activities including generating session data identifying at least one live communication session between the computing device and at least one other computing device. The instructions may further direct the computing device to interface with a remote sever, provide session data to the remote server, and receive data identifying at least one social network circuit from the server. The instructions may further direct the computing device to display, based on the received data, a visual representation of at least part of at least one social network circuit in a human-readable form. For example, the instructions may direct the computing device to render a diagram of one or more potential and/or active social network circuits meeting certain parameters defined by the user interacting with the client application.
The instructions may direct the computing device to change the graphical representations of social network circuits and members of such circuits in any suitable fashion. For example, the computing device may be configured to graphically differentiate active social network circuit participants, potential social network circuit participants, and social network members from one another.
The software product may be configured as a stand-alone application including communication capabilities such as instant messaging, file sharing, and the like. Alternatively, the software product may be configured as a plug-in module or other element adapted to function with another application, such as an instant messaging client or content-sharing application.
A full and enabling disclosure including the best mode of practicing the appended claims and directed to one of ordinary skill in the art is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification. The specification makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Use of like reference numerals in different features is intended to illustrate like or analogous components.
Reference will now be made in detail to various and alternative exemplary embodiments and to the accompanying drawings, with like numerals representing substantially identical structural elements. Each example is provided by way of explanation, and not as a limitation. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure and claims. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure includes modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
The technology discussed herein makes reference to servers, databases, software applications, and other computer-based systems, as well as actions taken and information sent to and from such systems. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the inherent flexibility of computer-based systems allows for a great variety of possible configurations, combinations, and divisions of tasks and functionality between and among components. For instance, server processes discussed herein may be implemented using a single server or multiple servers working in combination. Databases and applications may be implemented on a single system or distributed across multiple systems. Distributed components may operate sequentially or in parallel. When data is obtained or accessed between a first and second computer system or component thereof, the actual data may travel between the systems directly or indirectly. For example, if a first computer accesses a file or data from a second computer, the access may involve one or more intermediary computers, proxies, and the like. The actual file or data may move between the computers, or one computer may provide a pointer or metafile that the second computer uses to access the actual data from a computer other than the first computer, for instance.
The instant disclosure also makes reference to the relay of communicated data over a network such as the Internet. It should be appreciated that such network communications may also occur over alternative networks such as a dial-in network, a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), public switched telephone network (PSTN), the Internet, intranet or Ethernet type networks and others over any combination of hard-wired or wireless communication links.
The various computer systems discussed herein are not limited to any particular hardware architecture or configuration. Any suitable programming, scripting, or other type of language or combinations of languages may be used to implement the teachings contained herein.
The present disclosure provides several examples of communication systems that include social network circuit functionality. For purposes of example only, the disclosure uses several examples involving an instant messaging (IM) system. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the principles and teachings contained herein are applicable not only to IM systems, but any other suitable network-based communication technology, including e-mail, web-based communications, file and content sharing, audio communications including cellular and VoIP telephony, and the like.
One of skill in the art will note that user A's social network includes a plurality of members separated by varying degrees of separation from A. In this example, user B is separated from user A by a single degree of separation, user C is two degrees of separation from user A, and so on. Users D4, D5, E5, and E6 are the farthest-separated members of this particular social network, in this case being separated from user A by five degrees of separation.
As is also known to one of skill in the art, a social network such as social network 10 may be generated based on ascertaining a variety of links between the members. For example, social network 10 may be generated through lists of friends or contacts, such as would be provided to a social networking site. Network 10 may represent the end result of correlating e-mail or other contact information, such as a buddy or contact list in an instant messaging application.
For example, users A1, B, A3, and A4 may all be linked to user A on the basis of being entries in A's address book. Alternatively, users A1, B, A3, and A4 may be on a buddy or contact list in an instant messaging application utilized by A. Continuing with the latter example, users A5, A6, and A7 may be on user A4's buddy list, and so forth. One of skill in the art will recognize that the social network 10 may be generated based on a variety of different sources taken alone or in combination; for instance, some of the links between the users depicted in 10 may be based on address book entries, other links based on buddy lists, and still further links based on friend preferences provided by the users. Systems and methods for administering and using social network circuits as described herein may rely on any number and combination of underlying social networks. Data defining the underlying social network(s) may include data obtained from other, pre-existing social network representations. Alternatively or additionally, the underlying social network(s) may be defined from social network representations generated specifically as a basis for social network circuit participation.
As noted previously, however, a map, diagram or other representation of a static social network may be of limited use to user A. For instance, although A may be able to determine whether certain members in one or more social networks are online, A has no easy way of determining who is in actual communication with one another, the extent of such communication, or desired topics of communication.
Embodiments of the presently-disclosed systems and methods may be of value to users such as A.
Social network circuits may be used by members thereof for a variety of different communication purposes, including content distribution, collaboration, gaming, messaging, and topic-based discussions. Social network circuits may be administered and used through use of a plurality of computing devices linked by network connections. As was noted above, any type or combination of types of network connections are suitable.
Software application 110 comprises a social network circuit client application, while software application 112 represents one or more communication applications. In this example, software application 112 is configured to send and receive instant messages between and among the clients, and in this example is further configured to interface with an IM server 108. For example, application 112 may comprise an IM application such as AOL Instant Messenger or Yahoo! Messenger.
Software application 110 is configured to provide social network circuit functionality to each client by interfacing with one or more social network servers such as social network server 100. Each instance of application 110 is configured to provide session data to server 100, the session data including information identifying one or more live communication links between the client and one or more other clients. For example, application 110 may monitor communications activities of one or more communications applications 112 and generate session data therefrom. Additionally or alternatively, application 110 may generate session data by monitoring other activities of the client, for example, by monitoring operating system activities, other applications, or network connections. Application 110 may also be further configured to provide the client with one or more depictions of active and potential social network circuits based on data received from server 100.
Server 100 is configured to receive session information from the clients 102, 104, and 106. Server 100 may be programmed to continuously track one or more social network circuits by determining which members of a social network are connected by live communication links based on session data received from the client applications 110. The server may maintain a record of all active, potential, and past social network circuits through use of one or more databases, and may further maintain records of user preferences and other configuration settings.
For example, when one client establishes a communication link to one or more other clients, at least one of the involved clients sends a message to server 100 including session information. For instance, the client application 110 may be configured so that session information is sent to server 100 after the client initiates communication with another client and receives some sort of positive response. The server 100 can store information identifying the session. When queried as to possible circuits involving a client, the server may build an n-level diagram based on live sessions. N may be a limit specified by the querying client. The server may be further configured to observe an upper limit to n based on resource considerations.
Although depicted as a single server in
The system may be configured so that an active social network circuit is not created until one or more users explicitly request creation of a circuit. Alternatively, the system may be configured to automatically create active circuits based on one or more parameters.
In the example of
One of skill in the art will appreciate that application 110 need not be limited to tracking communications links between a user via a single application or medium. Instead, the system may be configured to monitor address situations in which a particular social network member may be connected to several members of a social network by disparate means.
For example, a multi-tasking user M may be linked to one member of a social network by an instant messaging connection while engaging in file-sharing with a second member of the social network. Application 110 may be configured to provide session information about both connections to server 100. Taking the example further, the user may be further connected to a third member of the social network by a VoIP telephone link, with the link also monitored by application 110.
Multiple instances of application 110 may correspond to the same user. Taking the example of multi-tasking user M, assume that, rather than using a VoIP telephone link, M is in contact with the third member of the social network by a cellular telephone link. In that case, one or more instances of application 110 would provide session data regarding the instant messaging and file-sharing links while a separate instance of application 110 associated with the cellular connection (such as running on the cellular telephone or at the cellular telephone provider) would provide session data regarding the cellular connection.
An example of the operation of a social network circuit administration system will now be discussed in the context of an IM conference amongst members of social network 10 as shown in
Assume user A goes online to talk to one or more contacts, and begins by messaging user B. Client application 110 sends session information to server 100 indicating that A and B are communicating using IM. Server 100 generates a record indicating that one potential circuit (A→B) exists. Some time later, while B and A are still in contact, user C messages with user D. Client application 110 running on user C's machine sends session information to server 100, which generates another record, with server 100 indicating existence of two potential circuits (A→B) and (C→D).
Assume further that, while the above messaging is occurring, user C also messages with user E. C's machine sends session information to server 100, which then modifies its records to show two potential circuits (A→B) and (C→(D and E)). Depending upon the particular programming of server 100, the circuits may be rendered as (A→B), (C→D), and (C→E). Of course, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the particular data and logical format used by server 100 to track circuits is unimportant so long as server 100 is appropriately configured to accurately ascertain the nature and extent of the circuits.
Finally, while the above messaging is still occurring, user B sends a message to user C. User B's machine notifies server 100, which makes a note of the newest live session. Server 100 is further configured to recognize that, among the four sessions, one potential social network circuit (depicted at 12 in
During the various messaging sessions, server 100 may also provide information regarding the potential social network circuits to the various participating clients. For example, server 100 may be configured to provide structured information in a format such as an XML file to each client indicating social network circuits which the client may participate in. For instance, the structured information may be provided to each client after session data about the client has been received. Alternatively, server 100 may provide the structured information to each client at regular or irregular intervals or in real time.
Data indicating potential social network circuits may be provided to users in any suitable fashion based on data received from server 100. For example, client application 110 may be configured to render a diagram depicting one or more social network circuits as an overlay on a social network, such as is depicted in
As one of skill in the art will appreciate, server 100 may comprise any suitable computing device or devices appropriately configured to obtain session data and track social network circuits. For example, a social network circuit system may track social network circuits using one or more database structures as shown in
The exemplary database structures shown in
For example, if users A, B, C, D, and E had previously participated in a social network circuit, the server 100 may annotate a record corresponding to the previous record rather than declare the existence of a new circuit. Data included in the audit trail may be used to provide additional features and options to the members of the circuit or enhance the efficiency and functionality of the system
The system may manage the status of a particular circuit or sub-circuit in a number of ways. For example, as noted above, "potential" social network circuits may include any members linked to the circuit by at least one live communications link. "Active" circuits may be designated based on matching members to one or more parameters that may be member-defined or system-defined (or both). When an active circuit is first created, all members may be added to the circuit with a status as "invited." Each user may then choose to participate in the circuit by accepting or declining the invitation. Users not participating in an active circuit may still receive indicators showing the existence of the circuit, and may optionally later enter a pre-existing circuit by making a request using client application 110.
The request may be directed to server 100 and/or to the other client applications 110 depending upon the setup of the system and/or the particular circuit. For example, the system may be configured so that server 100 adds a new member to a circuit only upon confirmation by one or more members of the circuit. The request may be directed to a designated moderator, for example, or may be forwarded from the requesting member to the moderator by way of server 100. In other embodiments, addition to a circuit may first require confirmation by all currently-listed members of said circuit. In such a case, application 110 may be configured to obtain permissions form the other client applications 110 and provide such permissions to server 100. Alternatively, of course, server 100 may query each client application 110 corresponding to the currently-listed members.
Server 100 may indicate a circuit as "active" until the initiator of the circuit terminates the circuit (or other users terminate the circuit, provided such users have permission to do so). Server 100 may be configured to terminate a circuit after the number of participants falls below a predetermined level. For example, a circuit may persist until one of the last two participating members exits. Of course, one of skill in the art will recognize that "terminating" a circuit refers to terminating an active social network circuit. Server 100 will continue to track one or more potential social network circuits so long as there remain social network members connected by one or more live communication links.
As was noted above, social network circuits are defined on the basis of live communication links between users. However, in some embodiments, it may be advantageous to utilize a delay option. When a delay option is used, "live" communication links are deemed to include both links over which communication is actually occurring and links over which communication has occurred within a predetermined time window.
Using the example above, assume that users C and D ended their IM session just prior to B and C initiating theirs. If a delay option was not used, user D would not be included in the social network circuit even if user D were still online and willing to participate in further discussions, for example, with user A. This would be because, in this example, without the active (C→D) link, there is no other path between users A and D.
However, if the definition of the circuit includes a delay option, the outcome would differ. For example, including a delay option allowing for a link to be active up to 60 seconds after the last communication could allow user D to remain in the potential circuit (C→(D and E)) long enough to observe the inclusion of A and B into the circuit via B's message to C.
The delay functionality may be implemented using any suitable technique. For instance, server 100 may be configured to identify a session as "active" for a default time period after receipt of session information from a client. In alternative embodiments, the session information sent to server 100 may include a time-out value different from the default value and set by the user by way of the client application. For example, client application 110 may include a configuration preference allowing users such as D to specify a length of time over which their status as "active" would persist for social network circuit formation. The preference could be tailored for specific users, times, circuits, and other degrees of granularity. Delay periods may be varied based on other parameters. For example, the delay period may be a function of the session type, the underlying network connection, the extent or volume of communication sent during the session, or other parameters. Certain of the parameters could be set at the server level, while others could be set at the client level.
In alternative embodiments, in addition to or instead of a delay option, it may be advantageous to utilize an advance option. When an advance option is used, "live" communication links are deemed to include certain links over which communication has not yet occurred. Users can provide a parameter to client application 110 indicating one or more time periods during which they wish one or more communication links to be "live." For example, if the users of social network circuit 12 wish to communicate every weekday at 2 PM, they can specify such a preference to client applications 110. Client application 110 may implement the advance option alone or in combination with server 100, such as by relaying the preference to server 100.
In any event, server 100 treats the respective links in the circuit as "live" at the designated time (i.e. 2 PM). Alternatively, server 100 may be configured to utilize audit trail and historical data to automatically schedule recurring social network circuits based on past times of interaction. The advance option could be combined with the delay option so that pre-scheduled links comprising a social network circuit become "live" at one or more predetermined times, but only remain "live" for a set time interval if further communications do not actually occur (i.e. users that decline to actively participate are ultimately dropped).
In this example, F is using computing device 150, G is using computing device 152, and H is using computing device 154 which may all comprise, for instance, laptop computers. User I is using two different devices 156 and 158. Device 156 may comprise a PDA, while device 158 comprises, for instance, a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) telephone set, for example. Finally, in this example, user J is using a desktop computer 160.
As shown in
Each of the several devices is also running an instance of social network circuits client application 110. Each instance monitors communication links between each user and provides session data over connection 101 to social network circuit server 100. For example, the instance of application 110 running on machine 150 monitors both the P2P (or other) file sharing communication link F-I and IM communication link F-G, while the other instances of 110 each monitor a single connection in this example. Session data regarding user I may be reported by two instances of application 110, with one instance providing session data regarding P2P connection F-I via device 156 and another instance of application 110 providing session data regarding VoIP connection I-J via machine 158. Each instance of application 110 may be configured to interface with the various communications applications 112 in any suitable manner in order to generate session data regarding the communication links. Furthermore, as noted above, application 110 may generate some or all session data by accessing other resources and processes running on each computing device, for example, information available from the device's operating system and network connection status indicators.
For ease of reference, connections between the various communications applications 112 and any communication-application specific servers (if any) are not shown in
Connections 101 may further be used by each client application 110 to receive social network circuit data for applications 110 to utilize in rendering social network circuit diagrams and other representations to users F through J. For example, although all users are not linked via the same type of connections, application 110 nonetheless will indicate to each that potential social network circuit 14 including users F through J is available. Thereafter, an interested user or users could then request the creation of one or more active social network circuits based on potential social network circuit 14.
For example, a user may request that an active circuit be created based on a communication type preference parameter, such as an active circuit using IM communications. Initially, the active IM circuit would include users F, G, and H. However users I and J could be given notification through application 110 that the IM circuit is available and could activate corresponding versions of IM application 112 b. Alternatively, the active social network circuit could be created based on any number of other parameters discussed herein.
As was noted above, a particular group of social network members may give rise to any number and combination of social network circuits. Various "active" social network circuits may be defined based on matching configuration and preference settings provided by users to create user-tailored circuits. For example, client application 110 may provide for configuration and preference settings for users to define the extent and nature of their participation in social network circuits. Such preferences may be stored locally and accessed by client application 110 in providing functionality at the client machine. As an example, each user may specify that client application 110 is only to display social network circuits with users matching certain parameters. Preferences may alternatively or additionally be relayed to the social network circuit server 100 for circuit definition, tracking, and other purposes.
Such parameters may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following, either alone or in combination: particular discussion or content-sharing topics, predetermined time periods or times of day of desired participation in active circuits, specified demographics or other user characteristics for circuit participants, specified content type or subject matter for file sharing, identification of particular clients for participation or exclusion, or social network parameters including maximum or minimum degrees of separation or user trust levels. The parameters may include simple on/off functionality for circuit participation as well.
Returning to the example using
Based on the preference information provided by members A, C, and E, server 100 may recognize that all three of said users wish to participate in a circuit devoted to "comedy video." Server 100 may automatically designate an active social network circuit including users A, C, and E. The circuit may provisionally designate A, C, and E as users pending confirmation of participation (e.g., by accepting an invitation generated by server 100).
Alternatively, server 100 may be queried by one or more client applications executed by A, C, and E for information about users for a "comedy video" circuit. The query may be the result of a request generated by users A, C, or E and sent using client application 110. As an alternative, the request may be automatically generated by the client application 110 based on configuration settings. For instance, user A may be interested in comedy videos and discussions of political humor. A's instance of application 110 may query server 100 for potential circuits including users matching the "comedy video" parameter or the "political humor" parameter. In the case of "comedy video," server 100 would return data indicating that users C and E are members of a potential social network circuit including A who are interested in "comedy video."
Based on the returned data, any or all of users A, C, and E could request creation of an active social network circuit devoted to "comedy video." Server 100 could be configured to verify that such a circuit does not already exist and, if so, provide the requesting user(s) with the option of joining the pre-existing circuit. If a "comedy video" circuit previously existed but was terminated (i.e. a prior session ended), the requesting user(s) could be provided the option of reviving the previous circuit.
As noted above, client application 110 may be configured to provide user A with a diagram of one or more social networks with one or more potential social network circuits overlaid thereon. Furthermore, sub-circuits and/or active circuits can be depicted as further overlays or alterations to the diagram. Additionally, application 110 may include support for display preferences in order to generate views of social network circuits and/or members therein based on matching certain parameters. For instance, users may filter views of potential and/or active social network circuits and sub-circuits based on configuration parameters and the display preferences.
Using the example from above, user A may configure application 110 to display existing social network circuits related to "comedy video." Users A, C, and E may be highlighted in active social network circuit 20 as is depicted in
As was noted above, a particular user may participate in any number of potential and/or active social network circuits.
Client application 110 could be configured for a variety of possible display options for various active and potential social network circuits, such as providing the overlays and simplifications of social network diagrams such as those shown in
Various combinations and alternatives for displaying potential social network circuits, active social network circuits, and sub-circuits will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, members of a particular social network circuit or sub-circuit may be differentiated based on highlighting, changes in icon shape, size, form, or color, changes in the link or links illustrated between the members, animation, textual or visual annotations or animations, and the like.
For example, client application 110 may render, for members of potential social network circuit 12, a diagram of social network 10 in which members of the potential social network circuit are connected by glowing arrows. Users interested in a particular topic may be denoted by an icon and/or text. For instance, users interested in "comedy video" (i.e. A, C, and E) may be annotated by a comedic icon. Alternatively, selection of a particular parameter may gray out or erase non-matching users from the display.
As was noted above, the social network circuit server 100 may include an audit trail tracking participation in social network circuits. Data pertaining to social network circuit use may be provided to client application 110 and rendered for display to users. For instance, a user may track the user's history of participation in particular social network circuits and/or the history of his friends or other social network members. User demographic and circuit use data may also be of interest to outside parties, such as social network providers, content providers, and marketers, and so may be packaged and provided to such outside parties.
It is appreciated by persons skilled in the art that what has been particularly shown and described above is not meant to be limiting, but instead serves to show and teach various exemplary implementations of the present subject matter. As set forth in the attached claims, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of various features discussed herein, along with such variations and modifications as would occur to a person of skill in the art.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|15 Apr 1991
|15 Jun 1993
|Xerox Corporation
|Updating local copy of shared data in a collaborative system
|29 Jun 1994
|14 May 1996
|Digital Equipment Corporation
|Automatic assignment of addresses in a computer communications network
|23 Nov 1994
|13 May 1997
|Xerox Corporation
|System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works
|3 Nov 1994
|10 Feb 1998
|Intel Corporation
|Method and apparatus for dynamically customizing electronic information to individual end users
|6 Apr 1995
|5 May 1998
|Firefly Network, Inc.
|System and method for recommending items to a user
|31 Oct 1995
|19 May 1998
|Herz; Frederick S. M.
|System for generation of user profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
|4 Apr 1996
|2 Feb 1999
|Lang; Andrew K.
|Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs
|24 Mar 1997
|16 Mar 1999
|Pfn, Inc.
|Dynamic distributed group registry apparatus and method for collaboration and selective sharing of information
|6 Feb 1997
|7 Sep 1999
|Delorme Publishing Co.
|Travel reservation information and planning system
|5 Nov 1998
|9 Nov 1999
|Lycos, Inc.
|System and method employing individual user content-based data and user collaborative feedback data to evaluate the content of an information entity in a large information communication network
|3 Dec 1997
|6 Jun 2000
|Citicorp Development Center, Inc.
|Method and system for banking institution interactive center
|8 Feb 1999
|6 Jun 2000
|Boardwalk A.G.
|System, method, and computer program product for providing relational patterns between entities
|25 Feb 1998
|11 Jul 2000
|Plantz; Scott H.
|Group publishing system
|14 Mar 1997
|18 Jul 2000
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method and apparatus for efficiently recommending items using automated collaborative filtering and feature-guided automated collaborative filtering
|6 Nov 1998
|21 Nov 2000
|Technology For Connecticut, Inc.
|Computer-based educational system
|3 Feb 1998
|21 Nov 2000
|Realnames Corporation
|Navigating network resources based on metadata
|1 Oct 1998
|27 Feb 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Systems, methods and computer program products for assigning, generating and delivering content to intranet users
|10 Feb 1998
|10 Jul 2001
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Direct data retrieval in a distributed computing system
|16 Mar 1999
|14 Aug 2001
|Novell, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for characterizing and retrieving query results
|19 Nov 1998
|23 Oct 2001
|Lycos, Inc.
|Integrated collaborative/content-based filter structure employing selectively shared, content-based profile data to evaluate information entities in a massive information network
|21 Aug 2000
|30 Oct 2001
|Taalee, Inc.
|System and method for creating a semantic web and its applications in browsing, searching, profiling, personalization and advertising
|26 Oct 1998
|6 Nov 2001
|Veridian Information Solutions
|System for controlling access and distribution of digital property
|5 May 1999
|4 Dec 2001
|Xerox Corporation
|System and method for collaborative ranking of search results employing user and group profiles derived from document collection content analysis
|11 Jun 1998
|8 Jan 2002
|Placeware, Inc.
|Collaborative object architecture
|1 Apr 1999
|16 Apr 2002
|Cacheflow, Inc.
|Self moderated virtual communities
|8 Jan 1999
|7 May 2002
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Automatic user interest profile generation from structured document access information
|26 Jun 1998
|14 May 2002
|Agentics Ltd.
|Method for obtaining unified information graph from multiple information resources
|15 May 1998
|14 May 2002
|First Union National Bank
|Regulating access to digital content
|24 Mar 1999
|16 Jul 2002
|Microsoft Corporation
|System and method for user affiliation in a telephone network
|14 Jul 2000
|20 Aug 2002
|Agent Arts, Inc.
|Automated content and collaboration-based system and methods for determining and providing content recommendations
|31 Mar 2000
|27 Aug 2002
|Ge Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc.
|Method and system for providing secure online communications between registered participants
|23 Jul 1999
|8 Oct 2002
|Jarg Corporation
|Distributed computer database system and method for performing object search
|25 Apr 2000
|12 Nov 2002
|Michael Olivier
|Dynamically matching users for group communications based on a threshold degree of matching of sender and recipient predetermined acceptance criteria
|11 May 1999
|10 Dec 2002
|Prophet Financial Systems
|System and method for implementing intelligent online community message board
|28 May 1999
|24 Dec 2002
|Nec Usa Inc.
|Method and apparatus for active information discovery and retrieval
|2 Oct 2001
|11 Feb 2003
|Ikimbo, Inc.
|System for creating a community for users with common interests to interact in
|2 Aug 1999
|25 Feb 2003
|Amazon.Com, Inc.
|Method and system for conducting a discussion relating to an item
|15 Nov 2000
|25 Feb 2003
|Sean Ward
|System and method for creating dynamic playlists
|4 Aug 1999
|25 Mar 2003
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method and system for generating and using a computer user's personal interest profile
|2 Feb 2000
|22 Apr 2003
|David Felger
|Method of billing a communication session conducted over a computer network
|3 Dec 2001
|22 Apr 2003
|Mercado Software, Ltd.
|Method for obtaining a unified information graph from multiple information resources
|31 Jan 2001
|6 May 2003
|Expanse Networks, Inc.
|Advertisement selection system supporting discretionary target market characteristics
|18 Mar 1998
|20 May 2003
|Ipac Acquisition Subsidiary I
|Method and system for hosting an internet web site on a digital camera
|17 May 2001
|17 Jun 2003
|Rakesh Mathur
|Techniques for identifying and accessing information of interest to a user in a network environment without compromising the user's privacy
|22 Jan 1999
|15 Jul 2003
|Nitin A. Borwankar
|Method and apparatus for a structured, synchronized conversation using electronic messages over a computer network
|24 Feb 2000
|12 Aug 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and technique for dynamic information gathering and targeted advertising in a web based model using a live information selection and analysis tool
|12 Apr 2002
|30 Sep 2003
|Ipac Acquisition Subsidiary I, Llc
|Network-based photosharing architecture for search and delivery of private images and metadata
|22 Dec 1999
|7 Oct 2003
|Fujitsu Limited
|Display control method and device
|2 Jul 2001
|7 Oct 2003
|Prolific Technology Inc.
|Dual-mode MP3 player
|22 Feb 2000
|18 Nov 2003
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Systems and methods for matching participants to a conversation
|8 Jan 1999
|25 Nov 2003
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Outbound information analysis for generating user interest profiles and improving user productivity
|5 Aug 1999
|3 Feb 2004
|Inktomi Corporation
|Adaptive traffic bypassing in an intercepting network driver
|23 Feb 2000
|2 Mar 2004
|Purpleyogi.Com Inc.
|Method for creating user profiles
|28 Apr 2000
|1 Jun 2004
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Internet based method for facilitating networking among persons with similar interests and for facilitating collaborative searching for information
|11 Oct 2000
|8 Jun 2004
|Cisco Technology, Inc.
|Methods and apparatus for providing shared access to an application
|10 May 2001
|29 Jun 2004
|Chin-Chi Chang
|Apparatus and method for coordinated music playback in wireless ad-hoc networks
|8 Dec 2000
|3 Aug 2004
|Ingenuity Systems, Inc.
|Techniques for facilitating information acquisition and storage
|3 Jul 2000
|31 Aug 2004
|Fastforward Networks
|Content distribution system for operation over an internetwork including content peering arrangements
|8 May 2000
|9 Nov 2004
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Mechanism for building access control structures for authoring systems
|30 Nov 2000
|14 Dec 2004
|At&T Corp.
|System and method for analyzing communications of user messages to rank users and contacts based on message content
|30 Sep 1999
|4 Jan 2005
|Fujitsu Limited
|Internet profiling
|17 Mar 2003
|22 Feb 2005
|Maquis Techtrix, Llc
|Online content tabulating system and method
|30 Aug 2001
|12 Jul 2005
|Cisco Technology, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for configuring access to a plurality of data repositories
|18 Jun 2003
|18 Oct 2005
|Contentguard Holdings, Inc.
|Repository with security class and method for use thereof
|31 Mar 2003
|25 Oct 2005
|Contentguard Holdings, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for tracking states of digital works
|13 May 2002
|29 Nov 2005
|Meshnetworks, Inc.
|System and method for self propagating information in ad-hoc peer-to-peer networks
|6 Oct 2000
|29 Nov 2005
|Martsoft Corporation
|Method and system for providing virtual access to information distributed across heterogeneous catalog servers
|14 Mar 2002
|27 Dec 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Schemas for a notification platform and related information services
|18 Jul 2001
|17 Jan 2006
|Learningsoft Corporation
|Adaptive content delivery system and method
|31 Oct 2001
|17 Jan 2006
|Sony Corporation
|Advertising and managing communities within a virtual space
|22 Dec 2000
|31 Jan 2006
|At&T Corp.
|Method of authorizing receipt of instant messages by a recipient user
|11 Mar 2004
|21 Mar 2006
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Method and system for finding related nodes in a social network
|4 Dec 2000
|4 Apr 2006
|Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc.
|System, method and program product for sharing information
|31 Mar 1999
|2 May 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Optimization of system performance based on communication relationship
|31 Jan 2001
|9 May 2006
|Qurio Holdings, Inc.
|Facilitating file access from firewall-protected nodes in a peer-to-peer network
|11 Jul 2001
|16 May 2006
|Amit Jaipuria
|Method and apparatus for optimizing networking potential using a secured system for an online community
|21 Mar 2001
|16 May 2006
|Qurlo Holdings, Inc.
|Method and system for providing a secure peer-to-peer file delivery network
|16 Jun 1999
|23 May 2006
|Atabok Japan, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for delivering electronic data through a proxy server
|20 Nov 2000
|30 May 2006
|Netzero, Inc.
|Automatic, profile-free web page recommendation
|18 Jun 2003
|6 Jun 2006
|Contentguard Holdings, Inc.
|Method for loaning digital works
|7 Aug 2001
|6 Jun 2006
|Sony Corporation
|Information processing apparatus, information processing method, service providing system, and computer program thereof
|16 Jun 2003
|27 Jun 2006
|Friendster, Inc.
|System, method and apparatus for connecting users in an online computer system based on their relationships within social networks
|16 Nov 2000
|5 Sep 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and system for e-mail chain group
|24 Jun 2002
|12 Sep 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Targeted information delivery to multiple users
|17 Jun 2005
|3 Oct 2006
|Friendster, Inc.
|Method of inducing content uploads in a social network
|29 Jan 2002
|10 Oct 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Cluster control in network systems
|17 Apr 2001
|17 Oct 2006
|Chemtob Helen J
|Method and apparatus for providing group interaction via communications networks
|21 Jul 2005
|28 Nov 2006
|Nextel Communications Inc.
|System and method for providing subscriber presence information in a dispatch network
|3 Dec 1998
|12 Dec 2006
|Prime Research Alliance, Inc.
|Subscriber characterization system
|13 Mar 2002
|6 Mar 2007
|At&T Corp.
|System and method for providing enhanced persistent communications
|11 Apr 1999
|27 Nov 2007
|William Paul Wanker
|Customizable electronic commerce comparison system and method
|17 Sep 2002
|5 Feb 2008
|Mccarthy Software, Inc.
|Using multiple simultaneous threads of communication
|30 Jun 2004
|15 Apr 2008
|Google Inc.
|Methods and systems for requesting and providing information in a social network
|9 Oct 2001
|6 May 2008
|Sap Portals Israel Ltd.
|User impersonation by a proxy server
|6 Feb 2001
|5 Jul 2001
|Diogo Rau
|Automated single-point shopping cart system and method
|15 May 1997
|15 Nov 2001
|Intertrust Technologies Corp.
|Cryptographic methods, apparatus and systems for storage media electronic rights management in closed and connected appliances
|27 Dec 2000
|14 Mar 2002
|Abrams Howard Allan
|Method and system for online live auctions
|4 Apr 2001
|14 Mar 2002
|Sherr Scott Jeffrey
|Online digital video signal transfer apparatus and method
|11 Sep 2001
|2 May 2002
|Levy Kenneth L.
|Using embedded data with file sharing
|29 Jun 2001
|16 May 2002
|Dalby Richard Sean
|Methods and systems for delivering announcements to users of an information system
|16 Jul 2001
|20 Jun 2002
|Hiroshi Kobata
|Controlling and managing digital assets
|20 Dec 2000
|20 Jun 2002
|Boies Stephen J.
|Dynamic proxy reconfiguration system and method to support sharing of extra capacity
|8 Jan 2001
|11 Jul 2002
|Systems and methods for travel networking
|11 Jul 2001
|11 Jul 2002
|Amit Jaipuria
|Method and apparatus for optimizing networking potential using a secured system for an online community
|6 Dec 2001
|11 Jul 2002
|Digital Doors, Inc.
|Data security system and method for separation of user communities
|22 Feb 2002
|22 Aug 2002
|Parity Communications, Inc
|Characterizing relationships in social networks
|28 Dec 2000
|5 Sep 2002
|Robert Adams
|Control of access control lists based on social networks
|21 Mar 2001
|26 Sep 2002
|Schleicher Jorg Gregor
|Method and system for providing a secure peer-to peer file delivery network
|13 Apr 2001
|17 Oct 2002
|Hay Russell C.
|Method and apparatus for facilitating load balancing across name servers
|18 Dec 2001
|24 Oct 2002
|Kuldipsingh Pabla
|Peer group name server
|5 Jun 2002
|24 Oct 2002
|Eric Pouyoul
|System and method for dynamic, transparent migration of services
|10 Jan 2002
|24 Oct 2002
|Geosign Corporation
|Method for providing an attribute bounded network of computers
|4 May 2002
|14 Nov 2002
|Armstrong Charles Allan
|Knowledge management system
|18 Mar 2002
|28 Nov 2002
|Maciej Wisniewski
|Sharing, managing and communicating information over a computer network
|22 Jan 2002
|2 Jan 2003
|Traversat Bernard A.
|Bootstrapping for joining the peer-to-peer environment
|5 Jun 2002
|9 Jan 2003
|Xin Wang
|Rights offering and granting
|28 Feb 2002
|16 Jan 2003
|Kabushiki Toshiba
|Community-based collaborative knowledge system, and message moving method in that system
|20 Jul 2001
|23 Jan 2003
|Yoram Yaacovi
|Redistribution of rights-managed content
|25 Jan 2002
|23 Jan 2003
|Mark Avnet
|Method and apparatus for inserting data into video stream to enhance television applications
|28 Feb 2002
|6 Feb 2003
|Kabushiki Toshiba
|Community-based collaborative knowledge system, and user access limiting method in that system
|1 Aug 2002
|6 Feb 2003
|Masaya Yamamoto
|Access control system
|3 Jul 2002
|6 Mar 2003
|Satyam Bheemarasetti
|Secure remote access using enterprise peer networks
|20 Sep 2002
|13 Mar 2003
|Structure for accessing and populating community websites
|10 Sep 2001
|13 Mar 2003
|Puthenkulam Jose P.
|Peer discovery and connection management based on context sensitive social networks
|30 Oct 2002
|27 Mar 2003
|Tomoichi Ebata
|Proxy server selecting server and proxy server
|31 May 2002
|27 Mar 2003
|Chee Yu
|Method and system for delivering files in digital file marketplace
|21 Oct 2002
|24 Apr 2003
|Angelopoulos Tom A.
|System and methods for peer-to-peer electronic commerce
|30 Aug 2002
|24 Apr 2003
|Tina Hearn
|Web environment access control
|31 Oct 2001
|1 May 2003
|Johnson Bruce L.
|Managing peer-to-peer access to a device behind a firewall
|24 Oct 2002
|15 May 2003
|Beesley Richard Craig
|Method of controlling the amount of data transferred between a terminal and a server
|9 Jan 2002
|29 May 2003
|Isaac Bentolila
|System and method for behavioral model clustering in television usage, targeted advertising via model clustering, and preference programming based on behavioral model clusters
|7 Aug 2002
|5 Jun 2003
|Gigamedia Access Corporation
|Hybrid system architecture for secure peer-to-peer-communications
|17 Dec 2001
|19 Jun 2003
|Microsoft Corporation
|Methods and systems for establishing communications through firewalls and network address translators
|26 Dec 2001
|26 Jun 2003
|Vishik Claire S.
|Usage-based adaptable taxonomy
|15 Nov 2002
|26 Jun 2003
|Rakesh Agrawal
|Method for directly providing content and services via a computer network
|20 Aug 2002
|26 Jun 2003
|Miles Cato
|Methods for rights enabled peer-to-peer networking
|15 Jan 2002
|17 Jul 2003
|Ibm Corporation
|Ad hoc data sharing in virtual team rooms
|25 May 2001
|28 Aug 2003
|Hellman Ziv Zalman
|Method and system for collaborative ontology modeling
|4 Jun 2002
|4 Sep 2003
|Farnham Shelly D.
|Social mapping of contacts from computer communication information
|7 Mar 2002
|11 Sep 2003
|Kraenzel Carl Joseph
|System and method for identifying synergistic opportunities within and between organizations
|16 Aug 2002
|11 Sep 2003
|Veridian Information Solutions, Inc.
|System for controlling access and distribution of digital property
|6 Jul 2001
|25 Sep 2003
|Schreiber Marcel Zvi
|Instance browser for ontology
|3 Apr 2002
|9 Oct 2003
|Luu Tran
|Personalization in a wireless portal server
|11 Apr 2003
|16 Oct 2003
|Ong Lance D.
|System for managing distribution of digital audio content
|15 Apr 2002
|16 Oct 2003
|Franke Michael Martin
|Methods and system using a local proxy server to process media data for local area users
|18 Apr 2002
|23 Oct 2003
|Eytan Adar
|System and method for automated message response, within a system for harvesting community knowledge
|23 Jan 2003
|30 Oct 2003
|Hudson Michael D.
|Centralized selection of peers as media data sources in a dispersed peer network
|13 Aug 2002
|27 Nov 2003
|Malik Dale W.
|Group access management system
|2 Aug 2002
|27 Nov 2003
|Crane Jeffrey Robert
|Method and system for providing a computer network-based community-building function through user-to-user ally association
|21 Jun 2002
|25 Dec 2003
|Thomas Malzbender
|Method and system for real-time video communication within a virtual environment
|28 Jun 2002
|1 Jan 2004
|Douglas Deeds
|Peer-to-peer media sharing
|17 Jul 2002
|22 Jan 2004
|Griffin Chris Michael
|Voice and text group chat display management techniques for wireless mobile terminals
|24 Jul 2002
|29 Jan 2004
|Xerox Corporation
|System and method for managing document retention of shared documents
|3 Feb 2003
|5 Feb 2004
|John Fairweather
|System and method for managing knowledge
|21 May 2001
|5 Feb 2004
|Creswell Carroll W.
|System for providing sequenced communications within a group
|8 May 2003
|12 Feb 2004
|Richard Reisman
|Method and apparatus for browsing using alternative linkbases
|4 Apr 2001
|19 Feb 2004
|Brandenberg Carl Brock
|Method and apparatus for scheduling presentation of digital content on a personal communication device
|16 Apr 2003
|26 Feb 2004
|Sky Kruse
|Method and system for watermarking digital content and for introducing failure points into digital content
|30 Aug 2002
|4 Mar 2004
|Abdelaziz Mohamed M.
|Decentralized peer-to-peer advertisement
|4 Sep 2002
|4 Mar 2004
|Ruchi Mangalik
|System for providing content sharing and method therefor
|17 Sep 2002
|18 Mar 2004
|Umeshwar Dayal
|Method and system for peer to peer common channel collaboration
|25 Sep 2002
|25 Mar 2004
|Wittke Edward R.
|System for timely delivery of personalized aggregations of, including currently-generated, knowledge
|1 Oct 2001
|1 Apr 2004
|Ariel Peled
|Secure distribution of digital content
|26 Sep 2002
|1 Apr 2004
|Arora Akhil K.
|Presence detection using distributed indexes in peer-to-peer networks
|26 Sep 2002
|1 Apr 2004
|Pabla Kuldipsingh A.
|Distributed indexing of identity information in a peer-to-peer network
|15 Oct 2002
|15 Apr 2004
|Carl Rajsic
|Method and apparatus for managing nodes in a network
|31 Oct 2002
|6 May 2004
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for building social networks based on activity around shared virtual objects
|11 Apr 2003
|27 May 2004
|Vandewater Eric J.
|System and method of protecting and promoting digital content
|19 Dec 2002
|24 Jun 2004
|Thompson J. Patrick
|Contact schema
|19 Dec 2002
|24 Jun 2004
|Joann Ruvolo
|Method of creating and displaying relationship chains between users of a computerized network
|19 Dec 2002
|24 Jun 2004
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and system for peer-to-peer authorization
|2 May 2002
|15 Jul 2004
|Forsyth John Matthew
|Group communication method for a wireless communication device
|29 Jan 2003
|29 Jul 2004
|Dimitris Achlioptas
|System and method for employing social networks for information discovery
|24 Jan 2003
|29 Jul 2004
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Method and apparatus for peer-to peer access
|25 Jan 2002
|29 Jul 2004
|David Sidman
|Apparatus, method, and system for accessing digital rights management information
|26 Jun 2001
|29 Jul 2004
|Lambert Martin Richard
|Digital rights management
|13 Feb 2003
|19 Aug 2004
|Pabla Kuldipsingh A.
|Infrastructure for accessing a peer-to-peer network environment
|10 Mar 2003
|16 Sep 2004
|Microsoft Corporation
|Digital media clearing house platform
|31 Mar 2003
|30 Sep 2004
|Simon Gibbs
|Method and apparatus for extending protected content access with peer to peer applications
|4 May 2004
|14 Oct 2004
|Erickson John S.
|Apparatus for rendering content
|4 May 2004
|21 Oct 2004
|Erickson John S.
|Methods to securely package content
|29 Mar 2004
|28 Oct 2004
|Ryan Grant James
|Personal contact network
|20 Nov 2003
|4 Nov 2004
|Radar Networks, Inc.
|User interface for managing semantic objects
|13 May 2004
|25 Nov 2004
|Eintelligence, Inc.
|Method for asynchronous sharing of integrated spreadsheets using a network
|3 Jul 2002
|9 Dec 2004
|Markku Kontio
|Digital rights management in a mobile communications environment
|2 Sep 2002
|23 Dec 2004
|Edwards Christopher P
|Server with file verification
|24 Jun 2003
|30 Dec 2004
|Andrew Feng
|System and method for community centric resource sharing based on a publishing subscription model
|21 May 2004
|20 Jan 2005
|Active Path Solutions, Inc.
|System and method for content development
|24 Jul 2003
|27 Jan 2005
|Mirowski Family Ventures, L.L.C.
|Methods, apparatus, and systems for multiple stimulation from a single stimulator
|27 Sep 2003
|27 Jan 2005
|Webhound Corporation
|Method and system for downloading digital content over a network
|12 Apr 2004
|10 Feb 2005
|Richard Postrel
|Command synchronization method and system
|12 Feb 2003
|10 Feb 2005
|Kendall Elisa Finnie
|Method and apparatus for frame-based knowledge representation in the unified modeling language (uml)
|20 Aug 2004
|24 Feb 2005
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Method for sharing rights objects between users
|20 Aug 2003
|24 Feb 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Peer-to-peer authorization method
|16 Mar 2004
|3 Mar 2005
|Cameron Jeffrey M.
|Controlling access to features of call processing software
|23 Aug 2004
|7 Apr 2005
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Method and system for recommending content
|24 Oct 2003
|28 Apr 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|File sharing in P2P group shared spaces
|3 Oct 2003
|28 Apr 2005
|Oscar Ponce
|System and method for creating and selectively sharing data elements in a peer-to-peer network
|14 Sep 2004
|5 May 2005
|Samsung Electronics Co,. Ltd.
|Hard disk having air guide
|1 Mar 2004
|5 May 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Community-based green list for antispam
|20 Nov 2003
|26 May 2005
|Encryptx Corporation
|Data rights management of digital information in a portable software permission wrapper
|9 Jan 2004
|26 May 2005
|Yahoo, Inc.
|Visibility profile
|31 Dec 2003
|16 Jun 2005
|Krishna Bharat
|Generating user information for use in targeted advertising
|20 Dec 2004
|23 Jun 2005
|Landsman Richard A.
|Community messaging lists for authorization to deliver electronic messages
|7 Jan 2004
|7 Jul 2005
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and interface for multi-threaded conversations in instant messaging
|1 Dec 2004
|14 Jul 2005
|Parunak H. Van D.
|Dynamic information extraction with self-organizing evidence construction
|26 Aug 2004
|21 Jul 2005
|Orkut Buyukkokten
|Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
|26 Aug 2004
|21 Jul 2005
|Orkut Buyukkokten
|Methods and systems for rating associated members in a social network
|21 Jan 2005
|28 Jul 2005
|Hopkins Samuel P.
|Method for improving peer to peer network communication
|1 Nov 2004
|28 Jul 2005
|Pepper Computer, Inc.
|Packaged, organized collections of digital information, and mechanisms and methods for navigating and sharing the collection
|8 Jun 2004
|4 Aug 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Method and system for seeding online social network contacts
|14 Jun 2004
|4 Aug 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Method and system for sharing portal subscriber information in an online social network
|21 Sep 2004
|4 Aug 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Selective electronic messaging within an online social network for SPAM detection
|21 Sep 2004
|4 Aug 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|System and method of information filtering using measures of affinity of a relationship
|30 Jan 2004
|4 Aug 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Mobile shared group interaction
|3 Feb 2004
|4 Aug 2005
|Novell, Inc.
|Techniques for dynamically establishing and managing trust relationships
|26 Apr 2004
|11 Aug 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Method and system for customizing views of information associated with a social network user
|8 Feb 2005
|11 Aug 2005
|Parallel-Pro, Llc
|Method and computer system for matching mobile device users for business and social networking
|4 Mar 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Miodrag Babic
|Method and apparatus for encoding and selective distribution of licensed digital content
|4 Mar 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Peter Pezaris
|Method and system for generating a proximity index in a social networking environment
|4 Mar 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Peter Pezaris
|Method and system for controlling access to user information in a social networking environment
|20 Dec 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Barry Appelman
|Passively populating a participant list with known contacts
|20 Dec 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Barry Appelman
|Organizing entries in participant lists based on communications strengths
|28 May 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
|Content distribution overlay network and methods for operating same in a P2P network
|4 Mar 2004
|8 Sep 2005
|Peter Pezaris
|Method and system for associating a thread with content in a social networking environment
|11 Mar 2004
|15 Sep 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Method and system for finding a friend in a social network
|27 Jan 2005
|15 Sep 2005
|Jared Morgenstern
|Method and system for collecting, sharing and tracking user or group associates content via a communications network
|1 Mar 2005
|15 Sep 2005
|Jonathan Wesley
|Dynamically integrating disparate systems and providing secure data sharing
|11 Mar 2004
|15 Sep 2005
|Alexander Medvinsky
|Method and system for distributing data within a network
|25 Apr 2005
|22 Sep 2005
|Xiaofeng Gao
|Web integrated interactive voice response
|19 Mar 2004
|22 Sep 2005
|Kenny Jou
|Systems and methods for class designation in a computerized social network application
|19 Mar 2004
|22 Sep 2005
|Marko Torvinen
|Method and system for presence enhanced group management and communication
|6 Oct 2004
|22 Sep 2005
|Mcyyappan Alagappan
|System and method for the aggregation and matching of information
|4 Jun 2004
|22 Sep 2005
|Kenny Jou
|Systems and methods for class designation in a computerized social network application
|13 Mar 2003
|29 Sep 2005
|Tamotsu Tomikawa
|Polymerization initiator paste composition, dental or surgical adhesive and adhesive kit
|15 Mar 2005
|29 Sep 2005
|Barry Appelman
|Sharing social network information
|24 Mar 2005
|29 Sep 2005
|Paseman William G
|Communication mode and group integration for social networks
|27 Jan 2005
|13 Oct 2005
|Short Gordon K
|Apparatus and method for organizing and presenting content
|31 Mar 2004
|13 Oct 2005
|Svendsen Hugh B
|Method and system for providing Web browsing through a firewall in a peer to peer network
|20 Apr 2004
|20 Oct 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Abstractions and automation for enhanced sharing and collaboration
|20 Apr 2005
|20 Oct 2005
|Shapiro Aaron M
|Systems and methods for improved data sharing and content transformation
|17 Jun 2005
|20 Oct 2005
|Friendster, Inc.
|Method of inducing content uploads in a social network
|21 Apr 2004
|27 Oct 2005
|Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
|Secure file sharing
|19 Apr 2004
|3 Nov 2005
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System, method, and service for finding an optimal collection of paths among a plurality of paths between two nodes in a complex network
|28 Apr 2004
|3 Nov 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Social network email filtering
|19 Nov 2004
|10 Nov 2005
|Linda Gottfried
|Method and system for sharing brand information
|26 Apr 2004
|10 Nov 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Privacy model
|15 Mar 2005
|17 Nov 2005
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Search system and methods with integration of user annotations from a trust network
|15 Dec 2004
|17 Nov 2005
|Aboulhosn Amir L
|Peer-to-peer file sharing
|30 Mar 2005
|24 Nov 2005
|Levy Kenneth L
|Recoverable digital content degradation: method and apparatus
|20 May 2004
|24 Nov 2005
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for in-context, topic-oriented instant messaging
|24 May 2004
|24 Nov 2005
|Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc.
|Systems and methods for multimedia communication
|9 Apr 2004
|1 Dec 2005
|Anuraag Agrawal
|Sharing content on mobile devices
|26 May 2004
|1 Dec 2005
|Nicholas Galbreath
|System and method for managing information flow between members of an online social network
|26 May 2004
|1 Dec 2005
|Nicholas Galbreath
|System and method for managing an online social network
|31 May 2005
|1 Dec 2005
|Jaushin Lee
|Distributed and scalable instant multimedia communication system
|17 Jun 2004
|22 Dec 2005
|Nurminen Jukka K
|System and method for search operations
|23 Jun 2004
|29 Dec 2005
|Steven Grobman
|Method, apparatus and system for virtualized peer-to-peer proxy services
|19 Feb 2005
|5 Jan 2006
|Radar Networks, Inc.
|Semantic web portal and platform
|14 Jun 2004
|5 Jan 2006
|Christopher Lunt
|Method of sharing social network information with existing user databases
|18 Oct 2004
|5 Jan 2006
|Christopher Lunt
|Visual tags for search results generated from social network information
|25 Aug 2004
|12 Jan 2006
|Ai Issa
|Proxy caching in a photosharing peer-to-peer network to improve guest image viewing performance
|30 Jun 2004
|19 Jan 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Partitioning social networks
|6 Sep 2005
|26 Jan 2006
|Sandeep Relan
|System, method, and apparatus for secure sharing of multimedia content across several electronic devices
|22 Jul 2004
|26 Jan 2006
|Christopher Lunt
|Authorization and authentication based on an individual's social network
|16 Nov 2004
|2 Feb 2006
|Schwarz Marcus R
|Relations between collaboration workspaces
|21 Apr 2004
|9 Feb 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Smart shares and transports
|5 Aug 2004
|9 Feb 2006
|Mcmenamin Marie
|Methods, systems, and storage mediums for providing multi-media content storage and management services
|16 Aug 2004
|16 Feb 2006
|Towley Carl K Iii
|Exercise machine using lever mounted selectorized dumbbells as exercise mass
|28 Jul 2005
|16 Feb 2006
|Antony Brydon
|System and method for using social networks for the distribution of communications
|21 Jul 2005
|16 Feb 2006
|Nicolas Baupin
|Method and system for managing identity overload and private/public availability of an instant messaging address
|1 Sep 2005
|2 Mar 2006
|Work James D
|Method and system for reputation evaluation of online users in a social networking scheme
|24 Aug 2004
|2 Mar 2006
|Tate Patrick D
|Reproxying an unproxied connection
|26 Aug 2005
|2 Mar 2006
|Henry Etkin
|System and method for dynamically generating, maintaining, and growing an online social network
|1 Sep 2004
|2 Mar 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Licensing the use of a particular feature of software
|15 Nov 2004
|9 Mar 2006
|Spataro Jared M
|Systems and methods for collaboration
|21 Jul 2005
|16 Mar 2006
|Nextel Communications, Inc.
|System and method for providing subscriber presence information in a dispatch network
|1 Sep 2004
|16 Mar 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Licensing the use of software on a particular CPU
|15 Sep 2005
|23 Mar 2006
|Nextel Communications, Inc.
|Public dispatch chatroom
|20 Sep 2004
|23 Mar 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method, system, and apparatus for creating a knowledge interchange profile
|20 Sep 2004
|6 Apr 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method, system, and apparatus for maintaining user privacy in a knowledge interchange system
|15 Sep 2005
|13 Apr 2006
|Nextel Communications, Inc.
|Ad-hoc dispatch chatroom
|15 Nov 2004
|13 Apr 2006
|Spataro Jared M
|Systems and methods for collaboration
|28 Sep 2005
|20 Apr 2006
|Arnett Nicholas D
|System and method for collection and analysis of electronic discussion messages
|27 Oct 2003
|20 Apr 2006
|Bodlaender Maarten P
|Introducing new content items in a community-based recommendation system
|13 Dec 2005
|27 Apr 2006
|Amit Jaipuria
|Method and apparatus for optimizing networking potential using a secured system for an online community
|26 Oct 2004
|27 Apr 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Chat user interface for threaded text chat systems
|7 Jun 2005
|4 May 2006
|Jason Krikorian
|Personal media broadcasting system
|20 Oct 2004
|4 May 2006
|Inbit, Inc.
|Collaborative communication platforms
|21 Oct 2005
|4 May 2006
|Hurtado Marco M
|Super-distribution of protected digital content
|1 Nov 2004
|4 May 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Dynamic summary module
|12 Nov 2004
|18 May 2006
|Patrick Connor
|System and method for the controlled on-demand distribution of content via a centralized server and a peer-to-peer network
|22 Mar 2005
|25 May 2006
|Nec Laboratories America, Inc.
|System and methods for data analysis and trend prediction
|14 Nov 2003
|1 Jun 2006
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|System to allow content sharing
|4 Nov 2005
|1 Jun 2006
|Tam Chung M
|System and method for creating a secure trusted social network
|7 Dec 2004
|8 Jun 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|User-centric method of aggregating information sources to reinforce digital identity
|7 Dec 2004
|8 Jun 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Tool for real-time graphical exploration of interconnected friends and groups
|2 Dec 2005
|8 Jun 2006
|Evil Twin Studios, Inc.
|System and method for organizing online communities and virtual dwellings within a virtual environment
|17 May 2005
|22 Jun 2006
|Antony Brydon
|System and method for enforcing privacy in social networks
|16 Nov 2004
|22 Jun 2006
|Chris Amidon
|Serving content from an off-line peer server in a photosharing peer-to-peer network in response to a guest request
|23 Dec 2004
|29 Jun 2006
|Hermann Calabria
|Vendor-driven, social-network enabled review system with flexible syndication
|23 Dec 2004
|29 Jun 2006
|Hermann Calabria
|Vendor-driven, social-network enabled review collection system
|27 Dec 2005
|29 Jun 2006
|Boloto, Inc.
|Software and method for advertisor sponsored events within a private centrally managed local or distributed network of users and an optional associated private network card for specialty marketing identification or banking
|23 Dec 2004
|29 Jun 2006
|Goldberg Adam J
|System and method for providing collection sub-groups
|29 Dec 2005
|29 Jun 2006
|Bandwidth Productions Inc.
|Interactive music playlist sharing system and methods
|16 Feb 2004
|6 Jul 2006
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
|System for ad hoc sharing of content items between portable devices and interaction methods therefor
|12 Jan 2005
|13 Jul 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Instant messaging communications network with selectable responses to active status queries, made to individual user display stations by other user stations, personalized to such other querying user stations
|26 Aug 2005
|20 Jul 2006
|Tiny Engine, Inc.
|Systems and methods for providing user interaction based profiles
|20 Dec 2005
|27 Jul 2006
|Ali Aydar
|Track listening and playing service for digital media files
|11 Apr 2005
|27 Jul 2006
|Identification and tracking of digital content distributors on wide area networks
|31 Jan 2005
|3 Aug 2006
|France Telecom
|Content navigation service
|28 Jan 2005
|3 Aug 2006
|Robinson Eric M
|Apparatus and method for message-centric analysis and multi-aspect viewing using social networks
|3 Feb 2005
|3 Aug 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Propagating and responding to announcements in an environment having pre-established social groups
|10 Sep 2005
|3 Aug 2006
|Moore James F
|Enhanced syndication
|12 May 2005
|17 Aug 2006
|Nec Laboratories America, Inc.
|System and methods for data analysis and trend prediction
|20 Dec 2005
|17 Aug 2006
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Control for inviting an unauthenticated user to gain access to display of content that is otherwise accessible with an authentication mechanism
|22 Feb 2005
|24 Aug 2006
|Erik Bethke
|Method and system for an electronic agent traveling based on a profile
|23 Feb 2005
|24 Aug 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method, system and program product for building social networks
|3 Jan 2006
|31 Aug 2006
|Luc Julia
|System and method for delivering content to users on a network
|24 Feb 2006
|31 Aug 2006
|Yahoo! Inc.
|System and method for enhanced media distribution
|22 May 2006
|7 Sep 2006
|Manyworlds, Inc.
|Adaptive Social and Process Network Systems
|22 May 2006
|7 Sep 2006
|Manyworlds, Inc.
|Adaptive Social Computing Methods
|24 Feb 2005
|21 Sep 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Peer-to-peer instant messaging and chat system
|22 Dec 2005
|21 Sep 2006
|Nikolay Anisimov
|Method for implementing and executing communication center routing strategies represented in extensible markup language
|28 Mar 2006
|28 Sep 2006
|Voon George H H
|Building social networks using shared content data relating to a common interest
|28 Mar 2006
|28 Sep 2006
|Hee Voon George H
|Device for sharing social network information among users over a network
|24 Mar 2006
|28 Sep 2006
|Nortel Networks Limited
|Generating a comfort indicator at an originating terminal
|11 Mar 2005
|28 Sep 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Viral advertising for interactive services
|20 Apr 2005
|26 Oct 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Collaboration spaces
|27 Apr 2005
|2 Nov 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Component based infrastructure for sharing files
|28 Apr 2005
|2 Nov 2006
|Content Guard Holdings, Inc.
|System and method for developing and using trusted policy based on a social model
|2 May 2006
|16 Nov 2006
|Tam Chung M
|System and method for creating a secure trusted social network
|30 Dec 2005
|16 Nov 2006
|Manish Upendran
|System and method for the propagation of DRM protected content
|24 May 2005
|30 Nov 2006
|Microsoft Corporation
|Integration of navigation device functionality into handheld devices
|8 Aug 2005
|1 Mar 2007
|Robert Haitani
|Operating multiple views on a computing device in connection with a wireless communication session
|1 Feb 2006
|15 Mar 2007
|Moore James F
|Systems and methods for use of structured and unstructured distributed data
|15 Dec 2005
|21 Jun 2007
|Microsoft Corporation
|Licensing matrix
|22 Dec 2006
|28 Jun 2007
|Catalog. Com, Inc.
|System and method for cross-domain social networking
|20 Jan 2006
|26 Jul 2007
|Microsoft Corporation
|Join in-progress on-line game session
|14 Dec 2006
|16 Aug 2007
|Mark Zuckerberg
|Systems and methods for social mapping
|18 Jan 2007
|23 Aug 2007
|Ilial, Inc.
|System and method for context-based knowledge search, tagging, collaboration, management, and advertisement
|23 Feb 2006
|23 Aug 2007
|International Business Machines, Corporation
|System and method for displaying IM session history as time-based calendar events
|13 Nov 2006
|30 Aug 2007
|Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware
|Real-world incentives offered to virtual world participants
|31 Mar 2006
|4 Oct 2007
|Jeremy Gilbert
|Methods and systems for providing data storage and retrieval
|21 Apr 2006
|25 Oct 2007
|Microsoft Corporation
|Meetings structures and global unique identifiers
|28 Apr 2006
|1 Nov 2007
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Multimedia sharing in social networks for mobile devices
|25 Apr 2007
|15 Nov 2007
|Pagebites, Inc.
|Method for information gathering and dissemination in a social network
|31 May 2006
|6 Dec 2007
|Red. Hat, Inc.
|Link swarming in an open overlay for social networks and online services
|27 Nov 2006
|24 Jan 2008
|David Foote
|System and method for peer-to-peer Internet communication
|25 Jul 2006
|21 Feb 2008
|Facebook, Inc.
|Systems and methods for dynamically generating a privacy summary
|26 Oct 2007
|13 Mar 2008
|Tom Reynolds
|Determining strategies for increasing loyalty of a population to an entity
|11 Oct 2006
|17 Apr 2008
|Cisco Technology, Inc.
|Interaction based on facial recognition of conference participants
|7 Feb 1996
|3 Jul 2007
|British Telecommunications Public Limited Company
|Reconfigurable service provision via a communication network
|22 Feb 2000
|6 Feb 2002
|Frank L Wells Company
|Coil spring forming and conveying assembly
|30 Jan 2003
|5 Jan 2005
|Microsoft Corporation
|Social mapping of contacts from computer communication information
|26 Oct 2005
|28 Jun 2006
|IBM Corporation
|A method and system for managing customer network value
|10 May 2005
|24 Nov 2005
|Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
|Processing rights in drm systems
|15 Nov 2004
|6 Apr 2006
|S.M.A.R.T. Link Medical, Inc.
|Social network analysis
|15 Sep 2004
|20 Apr 2006
|S.M.A.R.T. Link Medical, Inc.
|Social network analysis
|14 Dec 2006
|21 Jun 2007
|Facebook, Inc.
|Systems and methods for social mapping
|Amidon et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/607,775, filed Dec. 1, 2006, "Systems and Methods for Subdividing and Securing Social Network Circuits".
|Amidon et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/638,027, filed Dec. 13, 2006, "Systems and Methods for Social Network Based Conferencing".
|Architecture of Windows Media Rights Manager, www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howto/articles/drmarchitecture.aspx.
|Beverly Yang et al., "Designing a Super-Peer Network," 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'03), 2003.
|Deborah L. McGuinness et al., editors; "OWL Web Ontology Language-Overview", copyright 2004 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), published Feb. 10, 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/, 19 pages.
|Deborah L. McGuinness et al., editors; "OWL Web Ontology Language—Overview", copyright 2004 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), published Feb. 10, 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/, 19 pages.
|FOAF Vocabulary Specification, http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/.
|Home page for www.facebook.com (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)-1 page.
|Home page for www.facebook.com (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)—1 page.
|Home page for www.myspace.com (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)-1 page.
|Home page for www.myspace.com (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)—1 page.
|Homepage for www.friendster.com (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)-1 page.
|Homepage for www.friendster.com (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)—1 page.
|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijkstra%27s-algorithm (accessed Sep. 5, 2007)-3 pages.
|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijkstra%27s—algorithm (accessed Sep. 5, 2007)—3 pages.
|http://gaim.sourceforge.net/ (3 pages).
|http://pidgin.im/pidgin/home (redirected from http://gaim.sourceforge.net) (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)-1 page.
|http://pidgin.im/pidgin/home (redirected from http://gaim.sourceforge.net) (accessed Jul. 13, 2007)—1 page.
|http://www.huminity.com/english/software.html (3 pages).
|ICQ, http://www.icq.com/.
|Issa et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/639,104, filed Dec. 14, 2006, "System and Method of Sharing Content Among Multiple Social Network Nodes Using an Aggregation Node".
|M.E.J. Newman, "The Mathematics of networks," (chapter), 12 pages, 2008, in The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd edition, L. E. Blume and S. N. Durlauf (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/papers/palgrave.pdf.
|M.E.J. Newman, "The Mathematics of networks," (chapter), 12 pages, 2008, in The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd edition, L. E. Blume and S. N. Durlauf (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, http://www-personal.umich.edu/˜mejn/papers/palgrave.pdf.
|Marc A. Smith and Andrew T. Fiore, "Visualization Components for Persistent Conversations," Sep. 2000.
|No Author, "Centrality-Wikipedia," (website), 3 pages, obtained Sep. 19, 2007, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrality.
|No Author, "Centrality—Wikipedia," (website), 3 pages, obtained Sep. 19, 2007, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrality.
|No Author, "Centrality-Wikipedia," (website), 3 pages, obtained Sep. 19, 2007, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvector-Centrality.
|No Author, "Centrality—Wikipedia," (website), 3 pages, obtained Sep. 19, 2007, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvector—Centrality.
|No Author, "Dijkstra's algorithm," (website), obtained Apr. 10, 2008, 4 pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijkstra's-algorithm.
|No Author, "Dijkstra's algorithm," (website), obtained Apr. 10, 2008, 4 pages, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijkstra's—algorithm.
|No Author, "Huminity-Social Networking," (website), obtained Feb. 8, 2007, 1 page, http://www.huminity.com/english/software.html.
|No Author, "Huminity—Social Networking," (website), obtained Feb. 8, 2007, 1 page, http://www.huminity.com/english/software.html.
|No Author, "News-Gaim 1.5.0," (website), obtained Sep. 6, 2007, 3 pages, http://www.gaim.sourceforge.net.
|No Author, "News—Gaim 1.5.0," (website), obtained Sep. 6, 2007, 3 pages, http://www.gaim.sourceforge.net.
|No Author, "pidgin," (website), obtained Jul. 13, 2007, 1 page, http://pidgin.im/.
|Pretschner, Alexander et al., "Ontology Based Personalized Search," Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, p. 391, Nov. 8-10, 1999.
|Srinivasan, T. et al., "OPSHNN: Ontology Based Personalized Searching Using Hierarchical Neural Networks Evidence Combination," The Sixth IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology 2006, p. 44-44, Sep. 2006.
|The Case for a Hybrid P2P Search Infrastructure, http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~boonloo/research/pier/casehybrid-iptps.ppt.
|The Case for a Hybrid P2P Search Infrastructure, http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/˜boonloo/research/pier/casehybrid—iptps.ppt.
|Warren Sack, "Discourse Diagrams: Interface Design for Very Large-Scale Conversations," System Sciences, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference, 2000.
|Web page from The Friend of a Friend (FOAF) Project.
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|26 Sep 2011
|1 May 2012
|Zynga Inc.
|System using specific geographic area multi-level caches for caching application data
|15 Jun 2007
|14 Aug 2012
|Microsoft Corporation
|Audio start service for Ad-hoc meetings
|26 Sep 2011
|23 Oct 2012
|Zynga Inc.
|Social network application programming interface
|31 Mar 2011
|11 Dec 2012
|Zynga Inc.
|Multi-level cache with synch
|31 Mar 2011
|1 Jan 2013
|Zynga Inc.
|Social network application programming interface
|26 Sep 2011
|8 Jan 2013
|Zynga Inc.
|Social network application programming interface
|26 Sep 2011
|8 Jan 2013
|Zynga Inc.
|Social network application programming interface
|13 Feb 2008
|23 Apr 2013
|Microsoft Corporation
|Managing web services data and presence data
|26 Sep 2011
|23 Apr 2013
|Zynga Inc.
|Cross social network data aggregation
|27 Jun 2006
|28 May 2013
|Within3, Inc.
|Collections of linked databases
|25 Jul 2011
|27 Aug 2013
|Zynga Inc.
|Systems, methods, and machine readable media for social network application development using a custom markup language
|26 Sep 2011
|1 Oct 2013
|Zynga Inc.
|Cross social network data aggregation
|24 Jul 2008
|18 Mar 2014
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Discerning and displaying relationships between avatars
|19 Nov 2012
|15 Apr 2014
|Zynga Inc.
|Multi-level cache with synch
|17 May 2011
|29 Apr 2014
|Salesforce.Com, Inc.
|Method and system for providing status of a machine
|7 Jul 2011
|13 May 2014
|F. David Serena
|Relationship networks having link quality metrics with inference and concomitant digital value exchange
|19 Jun 2009
|20 May 2014
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for dynamically creating a community space in a virtual space
|23 Dec 2009
|3 Jun 2014
|Bmc Software, Inc.
|Smart impact views
|31 Mar 2011
|3 Jun 2014
|Zynga Inc.
|Cross social network data aggregation
|29 Feb 2008
|22 Jul 2014
|Microsoft Corporation
|Enterprise social networking software architecture
|15 Mar 2007
|4 Nov 2014
|3Degrees Llc
|Collections of linked databases
|26 Sep 2011
|25 Nov 2014
|Zynga Inc.
|Friend recommendation system based on a non-active social network
|23 Dec 2009
|16 Dec 2014
|8X8, Inc.
|Web-enabled conferencing and meeting implementations with a subscription-based model
|26 Sep 2011
|20 Jan 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Friend recommendation system based on an active social network
|26 Sep 2011
|27 Jan 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Friend recommendation system for a computer-implemented game
|26 Sep 2011
|17 Mar 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Active social network
|7 Jan 2013
|17 Mar 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Social network application programming interface
|26 Sep 2011
|7 Apr 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Cross platform social networking authentication system
|4 Mar 2011
|30 Jun 2015
|Puneet Singh
|User validation in a social network
|2 Apr 2009
|4 Aug 2015
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Preferred name presentation in online environments
|7 May 2014
|8 Dec 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Cross social network data aggregation
|30 Dec 2011
|22 Dec 2015
|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc
|Identifying files stored on client devices as web-based search results
|26 Aug 2011
|29 Dec 2015
|Zynga Inc.
|Friend recommendation system
|20 Nov 2013
|26 Jan 2016
|Match.Com, L.L.C.
|System and method for finding matches between users in a networked environment
|13 Feb 2015
|2 Feb 2016
|Zynga Inc.
|Active social network
|20 Nov 2013
|2 Feb 2016
|Match.Com, L.L.C.
|System and method for finding matches between users in a networked environment
|22 Mar 2012
|16 Feb 2016
|Google Inc.
|Synchronous communication system and method
|22 Apr 2013
|16 Feb 2016
|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc
|Managing web services data and presence data
|28 Dec 2012
|22 Mar 2016
|Google Inc.
|Synchronous communication system and method
|31 Mar 2011
|12 Apr 2016
|Zynga Inc.
|Cross platform social networking authentication system
|26 Feb 2013
|3 May 2016
|3Degrees Llc
|Social network analysis
|14 Mar 2013
|31 May 2016
|Lenovo Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
|Dynamically managing social networking groups
|12 May 2014
|6 Sep 2016
|F. David Serena
|Relationship networks having link quality metrics with inference and concomitant digital value exchange
|11 Jun 2013
|6 Sep 2016
|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc
|Managing web services data and presence data
|15 Feb 2016
|20 Dec 2016
|Google Inc.
|Synchronous communication system and method
|30 Aug 2011
|3 Jan 2017
|F. David Serena
|Social network graph inference and aggregation with portability, protected shared content, and application programs spanning multiple social networks
|18 Dec 2015
|21 Mar 2017
|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc
|Managing web services data and presence data
|20 Aug 2010
|20 Jun 2017
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
|Shared data transmitting method, server, and system
|13 Feb 2008
|17 Jul 2008
|Justin Middleton
|System and method for managing web services data and presence data related to a plurality of users
|15 Mar 2007
|18 Sep 2008
|Markus Michael J
|Collections of linked databases
|15 Jun 2007
|18 Dec 2008
|Microsoft Corporation
|Audio start service for ad-hoc meetings
|18 Jul 2007
|22 Jan 2009
|Yahoo! Inc.
|Techniques for improving user engagement with advertisements
|29 Feb 2008
|3 Sep 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Elements of an enterprise event feed
|29 Feb 2008
|3 Sep 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Enterprise social networking software architecture
|19 Jun 2009
|24 Dec 2009
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for dynamically creating a community space in a virtual space
|30 Jun 2008
|31 Dec 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Real time media-based social network notifications
|24 Jul 2008
|28 Jan 2010
|Finn Peter G
|Discerning and displaying relationships between avatars
|27 Jun 2006
|17 Jun 2010
|S.M.A.R.T. Link Medical., Inc.
|Collections of Linked Databases
|30 Sep 2009
|2 Dec 2010
|Rovi Techonologies Corporation
|Systems and methods for handling profiles in a community
|20 Aug 2010
|24 Feb 2011
|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|Shared data transmitting method, server, and system
|2 Jul 2010
|5 May 2011
|Chun-Min Huang
|Method of simultaneously displaying status of a plurality of contacts in an address book and related communication device
|23 Dec 2009
|23 Jun 2011
|BMC Sofware, Inc.
|Smart Impact Views
|23 Dec 2009
|23 Jun 2011
|Ramprakash Narayanaswamy
|Web-Enabled Conferencing and Meeting Implementations with a Subscription-Based Model
|26 Sep 2011
|6 Sep 2012
|Scott Dale
|Cross social network data aggregation
|17 May 2011
|6 Sep 2012
|Salesforce.Com, Inc.
|Method and system for providing status of a machine
|9 Oct 2012
|11 Apr 2013
|Brett Patrick Hummel
|System & method for tracking members of an affinity group
|30 Dec 2011
|4 Jul 2013
|Microsoft Corporation
|Identifying files stored on client devices as web-based search results
|22 Mar 2012
|26 Sep 2013
|Google Inc.
|Synchronous communication system and method
|3 Apr 2013
|3 Oct 2013
|Xtreme Labs, Inc.
|Method and System for Filtering Device Events by Social Graph
|1 Oct 2013
|3 Apr 2014
|Cadio, Inc.
|Consumer analytics system that determines, offers, and monitors use of rewards incentivizing consumers to perform tasks
|29 Jul 2013
|3 Apr 2014
|Verint Systems Ltd.
|System and method for passive decoding of social network activity using replica database
|5 Oct 2012
|10 Apr 2014
|Lightspeed Online Research, Inc.
|Analyzing market research survey results using social networking activity information
|12 Sep 2013
|8 May 2014
|Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute
|Method and apparatus for visualizing social network elements
|14 Mar 2013
|18 Sep 2014
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Dynamically Managing Social Networking Groups
|8 Jul 2014
|30 Oct 2014
|Microsoft Corporation
|Enterprise social networking software architecture
|20 Nov 2013
|21 May 2015
|Match.Com L.L.C.
|System and method for finding matches between users in a networked environment
|20 Nov 2013
|21 May 2015
|Match.Com, L.L.C.
|System and method for finding matches between users in a networked environment
|20 Nov 2013
|21 May 2015
|Match.Com, L.L.C.
|System and method for finding matches between users in a networked environment
|30 Jan 2015
|4 Aug 2016
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Social connection via real-time image comparison
|5 Jul 2012
|10 Jan 2013
|Serena F David
|Relationship networks having link quality metrics with inference and concomitant digital value exchange
|5 Jul 2012
|23 May 2013
|Serena F David
|Relationship networks having link quality metrics with inference and concomitant digital value exchange
|5 Jul 2012
|10 Jan 2013
|Serena F David
|Social network graph inference and aggregation with portability, protected shared content, and application programs spanning multiple social networks
|5 Jul 2012
|23 May 2013
|Serena F David
|Social network graph inference and aggregation with portability, protected shared content, and application programs spanning multiple social networks
|U.S. Classification
|709/217, 709/200, 726/3
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|26 Sep 2006
Owner name: QURIO HOLDINGS, INC., NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AMIDON, CHRISTOPHER;ISSA, ALFREDO;WALSH, RICHARD;REEL/FRAME:018345/0536
Effective date: 20060926
|17 Mar 2014
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4

subset: commoncrawl