text:
David Gilmour's No Colleague of Mine
There are many good reasons to be upset about the things the novelist and broadcaster David Gilmour said in a recent interview on the Hazlitt Magazine blog. Both he and I work at the University of Toronto, so my instant reaction was institutional defensiveness: unlike Mr. Gilmour, who teaches the odd college course, I am a professor of English literature here, and it stung to see his bizarre, reactionary views on literature and teaching associated in the media with my institution, and in particular with its literary scholars.
That's why I think it's important to say that David Gilmour is not a colleague of mine (though I speak in this, and in the rest of this essay, only for myself, not for U of T). As far as I can tell from his published comments, he's not much of a literature professor either. He seems to be fond of authors, and he says he loves their work--provided they are male, white, and very much like him. If they check those boxes, there are few limits to how far Mr Gilmour is willing to go in his passion. Take Proust, whom he loves so much, he's read him twice. A true worker in the vineyard of the literary gods, David Gilmour.
The biggest hits on his shelf, he says, are Tolstoy, Chekhov, and Proust. His love for these men is reflected in his teaching, which focuses on "serious heterosexual guys. F. Scott Fitzgerald, Chekhov, Tolstoy. Real guy-guys. Henry Miller. Philip Roth." But not, it seems, on the twice-read Proust. The massively guy-guy Proust, notorious philanderer, heavy drinker, gregarious man-about-town Proust. (Not the Proust you know? Someone might want to drop David Gilmour a note. Or send him Proust's biography.)
Women authors, however, Gilmour won't teach, because he just doesn't love them enough. Except for Virginia Woolf, whom he loves too much. Woolf he can't teach because his students, even in third year, aren't sufficiently smart to catch up with her "sophistication."
I don't know if this inane interview bears any resemblance to what Gilmour is telling his students. I rather hope it doesn't, but he said what he said, and he hasn't taken anything back in his subsequent interviews. And what he did say, besides the generally offensive stuff, barely reached the level of the average Wikipedia entry.
It certainly didn't have much to do with literature. I get why David Gilmour might want to do shots with Chekhov, but I have no idea why he would want to read his works. Authors sound a lot like George W. Bush when Gilmour praises them: great guys to have a beer with. Never mind about the writing, or the government bit.
All of which makes me think that it's probably a good thing David Gilmour isn't teaching Virginia Woolf. I'm a bit sorry he's teaching Chekhov, and Tolstoy, and Fitzgerald. I don't really care about Philip Roth or Henry Miller: he can do with them what he likes. And I'm sure there must be other white, middle-aged, male authors who would benefit from having the kind of pseudo-biographical rubbish draped all over them that Gilmour heaps on poor Chekhov, who apparently was "the coolest guy in literature." (Christopher Marlowe just called to complain. What makes Chekhov so cool? Whom did Chekhov ever kill? Did Chekhov ever catch a knife in the eye? Or get done for coining? Fuck that milquetoast Chekhov!) Chekhov, Gilmour informs us, also laughed loudly. And he made everyone around him a better person. Man, that Chekhov. What a guy. What a guy-guy. Oh yeah, and a writer, too.
Obviously, that's all a curdled mess of intellectual mediocrity. And really not worth bothering with. What is more troubling to me than the initial interview, though, is Gilmour's follow-up conversation with the Globe and Mail newspaper, in which he explains what he really meant to say:
People are calling you a sexist for refusing to teach books by women. Were your statements in Hazlitt misrepresented in any way?
They were totally, totally misinterpreted. I said, look, I'm a middle-aged writer and I am interested in middle-aged writers. I'm very keen on people's lives who resemble mine because I understand those lives and I can feel passionately about them -- and I teach best when I teach subjects that I'm passionate about.
So in order to teach, you have to relate?
I believe that if you want to teach the way I want to teach, you have to be able to feel this stuff in your bones. Other teachers don't, but I don't think other teachers necessarily teach with the same degree of commitment and passion that I do -- I don't know.
It is obviously Gilmour's prerogative, as a middle-aged writer, to be interested exclusively in other middle-aged writers. It may make him sound staggeringly narrow-minded and parochial, but so what: it takes all sorts. But what this attitude of I-relate-only-to-myself has to do with teaching is entirely beyond me.
Is passion about our subject matter important in the classroom? Absolutely. Is the passion required in teaching typically stirred because the teacher identifies with the author or the text she teaches? I seriously hope not. I can only speak for myself, but I can categorically say that I have never identified with Shakespeare or Ben Jonson. Marlowe, well that's a different story. (For the record: I'm nothing like Marlowe, and I don't want to be Marlowe. I like my eye-sockets too much.) And yet, I don't believe I have a reputation for lacking passion for my subject. But what do I know: most likely, I'm one of those uncommitted, indifferent "other teachers" Gilmour has in mind.
If feeling the stuff you teach "in your bones" is a requirement for teaching it well, I suspect Gilmour is right about his singularity. From what I can observe in my colleagues, I don't think many of them teach only authors in whose works they see mirror-images of themselves. English Departments would otherwise be rife with psychopaths, morbidly jealous types, pretend kings and queens, and wealthy socialites. And people who ride around on donkeys. I'm sad to say they're not. And I don't even want to think about how dangerous a work environment history departments would be: who would ever want to be next door to the colleague who's teaching Nazi Germany?
Gilmour's right, though, that passion, even love, are necessary ingredients in pedagogy. What he's got completely wrong is the who and the what of that love. Great teaching requires empathy -- the effort to understand things, ideas, and people totally unlike you. Some of those people are your students. Some of those things are of the past. Some of those ideas are the ideas of authors from different cultures than yours, and yes, shockingly, even of a different gender. Engaging with those people, things, and ideas is what teaching is all about. And not coincidentally, it's also what research is all about, and why research and teaching go well together. Most crucially, engagement with the other is what reading is.
Gilmour's account of his teaching, by contrast, is strikingly devoid of empathy. Chinese authors? Nothing like me, can't love them. Queer authors? Nothing like me, can't love them. (But Marcel....) Female authors? Nothing like me, can't love them. White men who are like me or the man I want to be? Love those. Sympathy is what this view of things is all about: one big group hug among white guys across the twentieth century, all guys like Gilmour. What's grimly hilarious, rather than merely depressing, is the predictable casual homophobia that goes hand in hand with this chest-thumpy, circle-jerky, narcissistic literary bromance: Gilmour loves Chekhov so much, he'd marry him tomorrow if only they weren't both so amazingly straight. The "literary" bit seems almost incidental. None of what makes Chekhov a cool guy, after all, has anything to do with the plays or short stories he wrote. It's all about his "personality." His grace. His generosity. His "bellicose laugh." And the right set of genitals.
What David Gilmour professes isn't literary scholarship or criticism. Never mind that he says offensive things (a big thing not to mind, I know). I'm sure we all say offensive things from time to time. Far more troubling, to me, is his basic failure to grasp why anyone should read literature at all, his stunningly self-righteous elevation of narcissism into the most powerful source of aesthetic appreciation -- the infantile pleasure of self-recognition, and ultimately of self-affirmation as the highest, even the only end of reading.
We can argue about whether Hamlet is right or not when he claims that art holds a mirror up to nature. But let's just say he is. Here's what Hamlet doesn't say: that art is a mirror you choose to pick up to see yourself. Art doesn't give you that choice. If you're playing along at all, it forces you to look in a mirror; and what you see there isn't supposed to be your pre-conceived self-image. It's something strange, or alien, or scary, or ridiculous, or dull; beautiful or hideous; unsettling or vaguely comforting. But whatever it is, it demands engagement, an engagement that can't ever be entirely on your terms. And sometimes, the mirror reveals something that you realize isn't strange at all, but is in fact you -- but that shouldn't be a happy realization. It's supposed to come at a price. It's meant to matter. And it's not meant to be as easy to come by as self-love.
If the thing you see when you look into a book looks exactly like what you think you look like, you're doing it wrong. David Gilmour is most certainly doing it wrong.
Yearling | $6.99 | Amazon.com "It tackles religion, the awkwardness of adolescence, and the weird contraptions that women used to use when they first got their periods. (References to the "belt" definitely confused me as a kid.)" -Kathleen Massara, Editor, Huffington Post Arts
Anchor | $10.20 | Amazon.com "In the near future, the United States is overthrown by a group called the Sons of Jacob. The bank accounts of women and other undesirables are frozen, and a group known as Handmaids become the hosts for the future children of the ruling class. This book will haunt you, and is a reminder of how easy it is for extremists to take over... Once they do, the target is often women. (No thanks, Santorum!)" -Kathleen Massara, Editor, Huffington Post Arts
Mariner Books | $10.40 | Amazon.com -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Norton | $10.55 | Amazon
Bedford/St. Martin's | $12.32 | Amazon.com -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Simon & Schuster | $5.99 | Amazon.com "I feel like he always includes extremely strong female characters, especially for the time period." -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Bantam Classics | $5.95 | Amazon.com -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Picador | $10.99 | Amazon.com "A much better pick for women than Middlesex...for some reason, he is REALLY able to capture what it is like to be a teenage girl in that book." -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Delacorte Books for Young Readers | $8.99 | Amazon.com -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Signet Classics | $3.95 | Amazon.com -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Putnam Adult | $11.28 | Amazon.com "A coming of age novel for those who came of age in the 1960s. Beautifully written story about a brassy divorcee (yes, that's what they were called) moving into a Long Island subdivision (think Levittown) in the 1950s that busts the myth of life behind the white picket fences." -Ann Brenoff, Senior Writer, Huffington Post L.A.
Summit | $12.00 | Amazon.com "The best novel of the women's liberation movement" -Ann Brenoff, Senior Writer, Huffington Post L.A.
NAL Trade | $10.88 | Amazon.com "This one rocked my world! It was ground-breaking -- uninhibited story of Isadora Wing." -Ann Brenoff, Senior Writer, Huffington Post L.A.
Vintage | $10.20 | Amazon.com " -Meredith Melnick, Editor, The Huffington Post Nutrition and Fitness
Picador | $10.20 | Amazon.com -Zoë Triska, Associate Editor, Huffington Post Books
Harper Perennial | $16.49 | Amazon.com -Kimberly Brooks, Founding Editor, Huffington Post Arts and Editor, Huffington Post Science
Little, Brown and Co. | $11.08 | Amazon.com "Just to know what 500 Million girls got so excited about!" -Kimberly Brooks, Founding Editor, Huffington Post Arts and Editor, Huffington Post Science
Avon | $4.99 | Amazon.com -Lori Leibovich, Executive Lifestyle Editor, Huffington Post
Harper Perennial Modern Classics | $10.04 | Amazon.com -Lori Leibovich, Executive Lifestyle Editor, Huffington Post
Reagan Arthur Books | $16.19 | Amazon.com -Lori Leibovich, Executive Lifestyle Editor, Huffington Post
Little, Brown and Company | $6.99 | Amazon.com -Farah Miller, Managing Editor, Huffington Post Parents
Little Brown | $14.10 | Amazon.com -Ann Brenoff, Senior Writer, Huffington Post L.A.
Little, Brown and Company | $18.47 | Amazon.com -Meredith Melnick, Editor, The Huffington Post Nutrition and Fitness
Grove Press | $10.17 | Amazon.com "An insanely ambitious novel which is really a memoir and doesn't apologize for that." Margaret Wheeler Johnson, Editor, Huffington Post Women
New Directions | $9.44 | Amazon.com "A women's boarding house novel is almost as great as a girls boarding school novel, especially if a bomb and a Schiaparelli dress are involved." -Margaret Wheeler Johnson, Editor, Huffington Post Women
Penguin | $8.47 | Amazon.com "My mother drove me across the Sabine bridge ten or twenty times in my childhood, and I never knew our safe passage could be a testament to her sanity until I read Karr's account of being charioted across it by her own mother who was in the middle of a psychotic break. Also a really fine portrait of flawed fatherhood. Karr is the master of revealing her (real) characters' dignity and crazy in equal turns." -Margaret Wheeler Johnson, Editor, Huffington Post Women
Penguin | $12.00 | Amazon.com "Her strategic plan for women: "don't study art," "never quit a job until you have another one" -Emily Peck, Managing Editor, Huffington Post Business
Holt Paperbacks | $1.99 | Amazon.com -Meredith Melnick, Editor, The Huffington Post Nutrition and Fitness
Harper Perennial | $10.19 | Amazon.com -Laura Schocker, Associate Editor, Huffinton Post Healthy Living
Bantam | $12.20 | Amazon.com "It's the body bible for every woman" -Alana B. Elias Kornfeld, Senior Editor, International Huffington Post Media Group,
Knopf | $19.11 | Amazon.com -Jessica Prois, Editor, Huffington Post Impact
PublicAffairs | $ | Amazon.com "Marjorie Williams has an incredible gift for profiles--the stories she writes about her subjects, from barbara bush to D.C. socialite, are so nuanced, so detailed and so intimate. The book also has a must-read collection of her columns about being a working woman and mother." -Bianca Bosker, Senior Editor, Huffington Post Tech
Broadway | $11.07 | Amazon.com "Not only is this book unique because it offers a Vietnamese perspective on the Vietnam War, but it also one of the few to offer a female point of view. Thuy Tram's diary offers an intimate look both into the war and into the life of a 20-something faced with becoming a woman in very challenging circumstances." -Michelle Persad, Intern, Huffington Post Women
Norton | 11.75 | Barnesandnoble.com
Crown | $14.95 | Barnesandnoble.com
HarperCollins | $17.57 | Barnesandnoble.com
Free Press | $26 | Barnesandnoble.com
Simon Pulse | $8.99 | Amazon.com "I read this book shortly before I became sexually active. This book, featuring Planned Parenthood, spared me from teenage pregnancy." Julia Jensen
Amy Einhorn Books/Putnam | $14.82 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
The Dial Press | $15.93 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
Doubleday | $17.79 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
Harper | $13.55 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
Riverhead Hardcover | $13.98 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
William Morrow Paperbacks | $11.69 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
Knopf Books | $10.85 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Sara Hadley
Riverhead Books | $10.09 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Rae Carson
Free Press | $9.74 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Lauren Hedinger
Bloomsbury USA | $13.60 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Shaunee Power
Bison Books | $15.56 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Shaunee Power
Harper Perennial Modern Classics | $10.87 | Amazon.com Submitted by Journalist/Author Rebecca Traister
Harper Perennial Modern Classics| $11.55 | Amazon.com Submitted by Journalist/Author Rebecca Traister
Vintage | $10.20 | Amazon.com Submitted by Journalist/Author Rebecca Traister
Vintage | $11.20 | Amazon.com Submitted by Journalist/Author Rebecca Traister
Grand Central Publishing | $7.99 | Amazon.com Submitted by Journalist/Author Rebecca Traister
Mariner Books | $7.95 | Amazon.com Submitted by Journalist/Author Rebecca Traister
Bantam Classics | $4.95 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Syretta Jefferson
Harper Perennial | $10.19 | Amazon.com Submitted by HuffPost Women reader Belinda Cech
Follow Holger Syme on Twitter: www.twitter.com/literasyme


text:
[] Close & Play
Duration: 210:12 Views: 169 936 Added: 2 years ago
There's no sex in this video, but if you're a rope bondage fan, you're up for a delight. Starring Yu Kawakami who is used as a model for a rope SM master. This is more of rope art video from Attackers studio.
Submitted by Crazy Japanese
No comments yet

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Heya guys! :) So, I am writing this story called The Encounter of a Lifetime and I would be really appreciative if you checked it out and gave me feedback and a bunch of other nice stuff :) In store for you doing that, tell me if there is anything you want me to read and I will :D
http://www.protagonize.com/story/the-encounter-of-a-life-time here's the link to read it. Enjoy! :)


text:
His statement in Lok Sabha came amidst attack by opposition BJP and UPA ally Samajwadi Party members, who said a high-level committee of the government had reported that China had occupied 640 sq km of Indian territory in Ladakh sector. The members were not satisfied with Antony's statement and created uproar. While BJP members were on their feet, SP members trooped into the Well, creating din which led Speaker Meira Kumar to adjourn the House for an hour.
Antony said National Security Advisory Board chairman Shyam Saran had visited Ladakh from August 2 to 9 and submitted a report on the border infrastructure there. "I would like to categorically state that Saran has not stated in his report that China has occupied, or has denied access to India to any part of Indian territory. I would like to assure the House that there is no question of India ceding to China any part of Indian territory," Antony said.
He said the Government has taken "all necessary measures to safeguard India's security and would continue to strengthen our capabilities in border areas to protect our national interest."
The report by Saran, Antony said, focuses on border infrastructure but also deals with several aspects relating to the region covering a broad spectrum of activities and requirements. He said Saran's report also deals with requirement of air facilities in Ladakh region along with matters relating to land acquisition and environmental and wildlife clearances.