text:
Crazy Is as Crazy Does
this wiki
|"Crazy Is as Crazy Does"
|Nagarote's challenge strategy causes them to lose twice in a row.
|Episode Information
|Worlds Apart
|Episode Number:
|3/14 (416)
|Original Release:
|March 11, 2015
|Viewership (in millions):
|Ratings/Share (18-49):
|CBS.com Summary:
|Episode Chronology
|"It Will Be My Revenge"
|"Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner"
Crazy Is as Crazy Does is the third episode of Survivor: Worlds Apart.
|Previously On... Survivor: Carolyn found the Immunity Idol while her White Collar tribe was embracing a bit of the No Collar way of life. For the Blue Collar tribe, hard work was taking its toll. At the last Immunity Challenge, Will fell apart. With the No Collar tribe facing their first Tribal Council, Nina was struggling to fit in. While Vince wanted to recruit Will. But Will promised to go with the young alliance to take out Nina. But at Tribal Council, Will decided to go with his own agenda taking out Vince. Leaving Nina on the bottom all alone. Sixteen are left. Who will be voted out tonight?
Day 6
|I wanted to stick with the split-vote plan, but Will ended up voting for Vince instead, and frankly, I don't trust him maybe as much as I did. And it just made me a little nervous.
|To me what happened in Tribal Council, you got to think ahead. And, uh, I didn't trust Vince, so I just prolonged my chances in this game. And that's what it's all about. I'm playing chess, not checkers.
|I thought we were going to blindside Jenn tonight and it didn't happen. Will bailed. I went into Tribal thinking we were going to be a solid three. And, you know, I left Tribal back to being an outsider again. The only thing that I can do is help the tribe win challenges. That's the only way I'm going to stay in the game.
|Nina immediately pulls a Nina and starts crying and gets all upset and then, like, brings in her hearing thing again, too. I'm like, "Nina, all you do is talk about your hearing. I get it. You're deaf. We all understand. Stop using it as an excuse."
Day 7
|Big papa, big mama howler monkeys just got it on.
|Shirin is crazy. She's like, "Guys, guys, there's monkeys, and private parts." I'm like, "What?!" I just don't even know where to go with that. I don't know how you work in Corporate America if you're so crazy.
|Shirin spent most of the morning talking about howler monkeys. And she's about as annoying, and as loud, and as intrusive as a howler monkey right now in our camp. It's weird and it's strange. She's got this, like, vibe that doesn't quite fit in. And she's definitely trying to fit in and it shows. But the reality is that it's actually painting a black X on her back.
|I think my best characteristic may be my worst characteristic, which is my mouth. I have a very hard time keeping my mouth shut, but I definitely feel that I'm not as bad off as I was, and I can learn from my mistakes. Sometimes it takes an anvil to be dropped on my head, but I can learn.
|Me and Dan were joking around. I forget what I said to him, but he-he came back with "Your mother's a (censored bleep)." Dan is trying very hard, you know, to make us laugh. He has to chime in on all the jokes, but the matter of fact is, Dan, you're not funny, bro. You don't talk about my mother. That's number one. You don't disrespect my family. Back home, if somebody ever called my mother a (censored bleep), then we're getting serious. Then-then the battle is on. Then I'm going to turn up real quick and I'm going to jump down your throat.
|I did not think Blue Collar people were emotional. But hanging with these guys, they are pretty emotional. As a cop, you know how to sit back, watch, analyze and then know when to interject. It's like sometimes if there's a bar fight, we don't rush there because by the time that we get there, they duke it out and they're calm and they've settled down. And we get there and are like "Oh..." you know, "you guys worked it out?" "Yeah." You know? But Rodney can be a drama queen. (chuckles)
|Dan's picturing, like, he's one of my boys from back home. But he's just digging himself a bigger, bigger hole. And we'll see where it ends up at the end. I mean, he crossed a line big time with that.
|Hali and I have been looking at these waves since we got here. They're perfect little barrels, and it's been kind of killing us not being able to surf. So, why not have some fun with it? We're using drift wood for our said surfboards. But they'll make do. They're rounded on the bottom, flat on the top.
|Body surfing was such a good idea. Like surfing is probably my number three passion in life. So when she pulled that out, I was like, "Yeah, girl. I'm right with you."
|This is exactly what No Collars do. I guarantee you the other tribes don't even think about doing stuff like this. But No Collars' lives are kind about having fun. Nothing is too serious out here. I don't know why everyone takes this game so seriously.
|With Vince gone, I feel like a little bit of the paranoia has left the tribe. It's a beautiful day. The waves are crashing. Everything is golden. I think we're good. You know, I just want to keep continuing to provide for the tribe. Keeping everyone's state of mind in a good, you know, frame of reference and bring that team camaraderie up, up, up.
|Nina, I love her, but I think she just felt like she was alone again. So, I'm going to try to become a little better friends with her. My mom was an interpreter for the deaf and she taught me and my three sisters sign language as infants. So, you know, I've been around the deaf community a lot in my life. And it's definitely one of those things that you keep in your pocket.
|Joe and I, we had a nice conversation. He really just wanted to tell me to have a little bit more fun. Before I lost my hearing, I did sales. So, I've been White Collar before, but I'm not now. Once I lost my hearing, a traditional job was not important to me. So, I really am a No Collar person, but these people are a little bit more free spirited than me. So I'm finding out that I do have limitations. I got to change or I'm going to end up going home.
Day 8
|So the whole tribe is out looking for the Immunity Idol. So I'm watching the fire, relaxing, kind of enjoying it because I already have the Hidden Immunity Idol. So I don't really have to search. Fun.
|Shirin is like a blood-sucking leech that just won't leave you alone and is the most annoying person I think I've ever met in my life. She's like the mosquitoes at night. They just... they're relentless. They're like buzzing in your ear, in your ear, in your ear. And you're just like, "God!"
|Joaquin was not himself. There was a fury behind what he was saying which is turning out to be pretty great for me because it means he doesn't know how to maneuver at all in this game.
|I'm on the outs right now and I can't find this Idol. So, I'm going to do whatever is best for me in the long run. Me and Tyler have good rapport. So, I showed him the clue to the Immunity Idol, you know, 'cause that's my boy and he needs to see it.
|Joaq decided to show me the clue to the Hidden Immunity Idol. On Day 2, just about, Carolyn showed me the Idol. But it was important to me that Joaq extend this sign of trust. When you actually show somebody and go that extra mile, there's, um, kind of a unity that comes with it. Even though Joaquin is on the outs, right now I'm really getting along with him, and Shirin's at the point now where crazy is as crazy does. From the nudity, to the talking to the monkeys in the trees, to the incessant talking around camp, I have a strong feeling that if we're to lose this next challenge, Shirin would be absolutely at the top of everyone's list.
|The man that I call dad is the pastor of my church, and he taught me at a very early age that, you know, if you work hard, good things will come to you. So you don't have to tell me to do something because I see that something needs to be done and I just do it. But this Blue Collar tribe, which is supposed to have the best work ethic out of all three tribes, is failing in work ethic, and I feel like Rodney is the worst.
|Mike makes his comments and I'm like, "Okay, this is annoying." Like, watch what you say because you're not the only one busting your ass. We've been doing stuff all morning with no thank you. Blue Collar people in general, we tend to critique other people's work ethics because we think that ours is the best. We think that we know the best way. We think that we work harder. And sometimes it's a difference of one less stick in someone's hand, but at the end of the day, I know in this tribe I have the best work ethic.
|Rodney's going to do what Rodney is going to want to do, okay. It doesn't matter how much you're busting your ass. This is a social game. Whether you do the most or you do the less, that ain't going to take you to the end. It's keeping everybody happy, man. Just get off my back.
|Mike's the number one target right now, so I gotta lay low. You know, go back on my-my three C's: my Cool, Calm and Collective and then it'll take me to the promise land.
|Mike is being ignorant right now; it's the one thing that I cannot take. And of course, he wants to sit there and fight with me of all people. Like, I know that you have some Bible verse on your back, but that didn't help the fire get tended to.
|I'm not sitting here saying that I'm the best Christian in the world, but I do have a relationship with God. That was very offensive to me. And I mean, honestly, hurt my feelings on a personal level.
|Mike always says, "And if that's why you guys want to send me home, then send me home." Wish come true, (censored bleep). Sorry.
|I thought we was at damn boot camp. This was ridiculous. The challenge kicked my ass today. It really did. It kicked my ass. The sad fact is we got to go to another Tribal Council and, uh, I think it's time for Nina to go.
|Man, we were so close today. And I feel a little bit of responsibility 'cause I kind of came up with the strategy and the game plan, and I should have just shut up and let Nina participate. And I feel pretty bad about it because I screwed her over today. And I know Nina doesn't want to go home. No one wants to go home from this game. So she wants to fight, she'll fight.
|We blew it again. We tried to make Nina a non-factor, and it cost us. So, back to Tribal Council we go.
|I think tonight's vote is definitely between me and Will. Because the three that are in control right now are Joe, Jenn and Hali, so I need to convince them to vote Will over me.
|Nina and Will are definitely on borrowed time. Will did not perform in the challenge. It was embarrassing. Plus I still don't really trust him at all. He seems sneaky. But, you, know, Nina, she's a wet blanket on the entire tribe.
|Nina is just so frail and her attitude is not there, but Will is struggling, like, hardcore. Will voted for the wrong person the last Tribal, and now, you know, I don't trust him. I think he's a snake. So my biggest fear moving forward is that Will might do something idiotic and that Jenn and I will have trouble at the merge. So we're between a rock and a hard place right now. Who is going to go home? Will it be Will or Nina?
Challenge: Dear Liza
Each tribe will carry a large bucket to a water tower where they will fill it. They will then race back and work together to plug as many of the holes as they can in their bucket to keep the water from leaking out. Then they will empty what's left into a barrel and head back out. The first two tribes to fill their barrel and raise their flag win immunity and reward.
Reward: Tarp (with comfort items for 1st place)
Winners (in order of finish): Escameca & Masaya
|Reward/Immunity Challenge: Dear Liza
Dan, Kelly, Mike, Rodney, & Sierra
Carolyn, Joaquin, Max, Shirin, & Tyler
Hali, Jenn, Joe, Nina, & Will
Tribal Council
| Tribal Council 3:
| Voted
Nina (3 votes)
Jenn, Joe, Will
Will (2 votes)
Hali, Nina
Nina Poersch
Voting Confessionals
No voting confessionals were given during this episode. However, both Nina and Will were shown writing each others' name down on the parchment.
Final Words
|According to them I'm not as free spirited as they are and maybe I'm not. You know, maybe being out here in the elements and being with complete total strangers brought out a different side of me. So, I, you know, I'm going to really dig deep in myself and maybe make some changes in that way. This was definitely a life altering eight days.
Still in the Running
Behind the Scenes
- The "Dear Liza" challenge was a throwback of the Reward Challenge from "A Bunch of Idiots". However, in the recent rendition of the challenge had more obstacles: namely, a mud pit, a bamboo run and a crate.
- By this episode, all three tribes had finished first in an Immunity Challenge at least once, a first in three-tribe seasons.
- This is the first time where a split vote concerning only 5 castaways in a tribe was done.
- As of Survivor: Cambodia, this is the last time in Joe Anglim's Survivor career that he attends Tribal Council while not immune from the vote and does not receive at least two votes against him.
Episode Title
- The title was said by Tyler Fredrickson about Shirin Oskooi and her behavior, making her a target.
|Survivor: Worlds Apart Episodes
"It's Survivor Warfare" · "It Will Be My Revenge" · "Crazy Is as Crazy Does" · "Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner" · "We're Finally Playing Some Survivor" · "Odd Woman Out" · "The Line Will Be Drawn Tonight" · "Keep It Real" · "Livin' on the Edge" · "Bring the Popcorn" · "Survivor Russian Roulette" · "Holding On for Dear Life" · "My Word Is My Bond" · "It's a Fickle, Fickle Game"


text:
Professor Nina Fishman was one of the outstanding labour and social historians of her generation. Her academic qualities were enhanced by an encyclopaedic depth of research into the most remote, albeit fascinating, aspects of British, European and American labour history. This was combined with a vivaciously enagaging personality that became an inspiration to countless young students whose minds Fishman opened up to a subject which some universities thought, mistakenly, had lost its old appeal. Professor Fishman's magic was to revive that interest, which she consolidated in numerous books and learned essays, culminating in a magnum opus two-volume biography of the miners' leader, the late Arthur Horner.
This seminal work, to which she devoted years of original research, was finally completed as she fell victim of an incurable cancer: it remains as a powerful memorial, to be published early next year. Without doubt the Horner biography will rank as one of the great classics of British labour and trade union history – a fitting bequest from this exceptionally talented and vividly charming woman.
The Horner book contains another aspect – it reflects the political, intellectual and moral character of the author as much as it describes the subject. Nina Fishman grew up under the spell of her remarkable father, Professor Leslie (Lazar) Fishman, the son of Jewish refugees from Czarist Russia who escaped to North America.
A talented economist on the US academic circuit, he joined the American Communist Party in 1939 and when America came into the war enlisted in the US army. He was involved in the D-Day landings but refused officer training to remain in the ranks as an outspoken Communist.
In post-war America his political commitment wrecked any chances he had of reaching academic stardom in the United States once McCarthyism took root so he quit America to bring his family to Britain after winning a Ford Foundation fellowship to work in the economics department of Cambridge, where his mentor colleague was Professor Nicholas Kaldor. Later Fishman moved on to Keele University where he was appointed the first Chair in Economics. It was under his umbrella of inspiration that his daughter Nina began her economic and history studies at Sussex University.
She was the eldest child with two younger brothers and determined to follow her father's commitment to research and political history. Yet there was one big difference; she refused to join any political grouping, and though she preserved a commitment to the socialist idea she resisted membership of any party; she carefully steered clear of Communist Party membership despite close contact with numerous senior British communists. Yet much of her historic research became devoted to labour and trade union history in which prominent communists played a crucial role.
A great deal of her early teaching was lecturing to groups of trade union shop stewards on labour history. It is an interesting Freudian exercise to speculate on why she resisted following her father's political footsteps while in every other sense was devoted to him and his lifetime's work. The answer in my view is that she rose above an emotional legacy to remain attached to objective research, as well as recognising the flaws and contradictions in communism. This emerges powerfully in her brilliant analysis of Arthur Horner's political dilemma.
Horner , the general secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers after the Second World War, was the British communist who probably exercised greatest influence of all on trade union thinking at that time. Indeed, along with Ernest Bevin he was arguably the most impressive British trade union leader of his time. Nina Fishman's book tells the Horner story by exposing his inner conflicts like a piece of political drama straight out of Roman history – perhaps, also, with an undertone refecting the author's own political dilemma.
Nina Fishman was born in San Francisco on 26 May 1946 and came to England with her parents in 1968, a 22-year-old already equipped with strong academic potential from her Californian education and her father's tuition. At Sussex University she read economics and history, specialising in trade union and labour studies.
With a good degree she found jobs with various trade union organisations, notably in the research department of the National Union of Mineworkers at its then London head-quarters. She became prominent in the NUM's administration during the 1972 national coal strike, after which she moved back to teaching, first at the Polytechnic of North West London and then as a highly admired lecturer at the University of Westminster.
From that base she was regularly involved with the TUC in running courses for shop stewards. That is where she met her future husband, Phil McManus, who was a full-time trade union official at the Kodak factory in North London. Fishman also came under the academic focus of Professor Eric Hobsbawm, who persuaded her to read for a PhD and supervised her progress; again it was an inspired accident of circumstance which certainly helped to propel Fishman to her eventual Professorship at Westminster, where she gained the personal Chair of History.
From there she was encouraged to move to Swansea in 2005 as Honorary Professor in the Department of History, where she worked closely with senior academics such as Pro-Vice Chancellor Professor Noel Thompson and Professor Christopher Williams. Both of them speak with great warmth and admiration of her work and her devotion to students' interests and welfare.
In addition to her academic commitments in Britain, Nina Fishman held various honorary roles in European institutions; she was a firm pro-European, a strong believer in electoral reform and, as Professor Williams has said, "undoubtedly a driving force" in everything she did. Hers was a death far too early. She is survived by her husband and two brothers, David and Danny Fishman.
Geoffrey Goodman
Professor Nina Fishman, academic, labour and social historian: born San Francisco 26 May 1946; married Phil McManus; died Swansea 5 December 2009.Reuse content

subset: commoncrawl


text:
One of the top prospects in the state of Tennessee resides in Memphis.
It appears that four star defensive end Frank Herron of Memphis Central High School, who recently picked up an offer from LSU, is thinking a lot about Tigers but not the ones from Baton Rouge.
Herron confirmed with TigerAuthority.com that he is impressed with his home town Tigers in Memphis and will give new Memphis Coach Justin Fuente a fair chance to earn his services.
"I was blessed to get the Memphis offer," Herron said. "It's my hometown. Coach Fuente is changing the program around, I really like him so far."
Herron has made to a few practices at the University of Memphis and has gotten a chance to visit with Fuente.
"He told me how I could help change and create new trends at the University of Memphis," Herron said. "He said I could be the reason that my hometown school returns to glory."
How interested is Herron in Memphis?
"I'm considering them a lot," Herron said. "I like the way he runs his practices, I like how he is a players coach. You can talk to him anytime about anything."
Herron, a 6-foot-5, 235-pound defender, is a four star prospect by Scout.com and is ranked the No. 21 defensive end in the nation. He finished with 54 tackles, 7 sacks, 7 tackles for loss, 3 forced fumbles and three fumble recoveries including one touchdown.


text:
ED Magedson – Founder
Ripoff Report
UK Border Force on Sky BroadcastIsleworth Internet United States of America
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/07/2012 05:57 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/uk-border-force-on-sky-broadcast/internet/uk-border-force-on-sky-broadcast-an-officer-on-uk-border-force-prograramme-on-british-sky-965790. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on UK Border Force on Sky Broadcast
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.


text:
When you purchase a gift certificate, we'll email the certificate with a unique code to your designated giftee or we'll send it to you so that you can print it out and hand it to them yourself – whatever you want, just let us know. Out gift certificates can be redeemed both online or in the store!
To redeem the certificate online you just enter the code in the discount code field on the shopping bag page and the value of the certificate will be deducted from the total. The gift certificates do not expire, but they can be used only once, so the full value of the certificate must be redeemed.
Definitely the simplest way to spread the softness and comfort of bamboo, and the perfect answer to the question "what do you buy for the girl who has everything?" (and we all know a few of those…)
Note: When purchasing a gift certificate be sure to choose the "no shipping" option so a shipping charge won't be added to your order


text:
At the recent Annual meeting of Winslow Town Council Wendy Castle was elected as the new Town Mayor. Wendy became a member of the Council some 13 years ago and in that time has served on most of the various committees. Councillor Castle said:
"During my membership of the Council my aspirations have remained much the same; we have a very special Town, with a caring and friendly community that deserves to be protected and enhanced wherever possible. I look forward to a continuation of the good and necessary work carried out by the Council and to improved relationships and communications with all the Town's organisations".
At the same meeting, Councillor Harry Chambers was elected Deputy Mayor. Councillor Chambers said:
"I look forward to assisting the new Town Mayor during her time in office".
- At March 06, 2017
- By TownClerk
- In Events, Important News, Uncategorized
- 0
The second issue of The Town Crier is now out. This edition also has a Special Community Survey Supplement about the consultation event for a possible new community centre. There is also a survey questionnaire.
The first edition of the Winslow Town Crier has now been delivered to homes in the town. Keeping residents informed of what the 'council is up to is a difficult task and The Crier is just one step towards that.
Winslow Town Council Response to Draft VALP
Winslow Town Council Response to Draft VALP
1) The original draft VALP document on page 32 indicated the Housing Requirement for Aylesbury was 14,113 and the District total was 33,344 but in the more recent version the figures are 15,845 for Aylesbury (a 12.2% increase) and the Total is 34,910 (a 4.7% increase), when the official requirement is 33,300. How and why have these significant changes occurred? Suddenly, for no clear reason, Aylesbury's share of the district-wide total for new homes has shot up from 42.3% to 45.4%. However, this is still well short of the 51% indicated as the target delivery share for Aylesbury in the VALP Issues and Options document, with an excessive proportion now allocated to the north of the District.
2) Paras 1.38 and 1.39 state about a 40,000 increase in the Vale's population during the Plan period. This does not equate with an increase of 33,300 homes, which, even with an overall reduction in average occupancy rate from the current level by 2033, would surely see an increase of at least 70,000 in population. Does the 40,000 figure exclude the 'unmet need' element and is only detailing the result of the Vale's OAN? This is not clear and should be.
3) It would appear that the pressure to deliver a successful Local Plan is resulting in an over-reaction to the 'duty to cooperate'. The unmet need figures from HMA partners appear to be unnecessarily high and need to be very carefully scrutinised.
4) There are grave concerns over the unmet need element of the total housing figure in the draft VALP, which we are advised could increase further. It already represents a 56% increase on the figure for new homes to meet the Objectively Assessed Need for the Vale. Neighbouring LPAs are stating that with the land they are able to allocate for new homes in their Local Plans, they have reached their capacity and expect/assume they can simply shunt their excess into the Vale. This must logically mean that when the next series of formulating new Local Plans comes round, unless the situation changes very radically indeed, the Vale will be expected to provide all the new homes required to meet the growth needs of these 3 neighbouring Local Authorities as well as the Vale's and undoubtedly the unmet needs of other LPAs. This is an irrational and unacceptable scenario. Government and the 'overspill' LPAs should be made aware that this scenario must be recognised and addressed now in the expectation that common sense will prevail and some of the proposed overspill is relocated away from the Vale.
5) Para 1.19 read logically suggests that the delivery of the new A421 expressway is further away than east-west rail. We anticipate that delivery EWR is now 2022 at the earliest so this limits the timescale for a new settlement that relies on the A421 for access. On the other hand, if the A421 is to be funded by development it gives time for the funding to be got in hand, though supplying houses and then building the infrastructure would be unnecessarily chaotic.
6) Para 1.21 suggests that the plan has been informed by incomplete traffic modelling "traffic modelling of impacts of the proposed development is being prepared and has partly informed this draft plan". Essentially traffic modelling is not yet done, and for A413 this is very important. Traffic is treated in terms of impact mitigation which seems unnecessarily simplistic, there is the important matter of whether the necessary traffic flows are possible in the first place, especially for A413, Little Horwood Road and A421. Very little consideration seems to have gone into transport beyond the grand projects of HS2, EWR and the expressway. Road improvements are needed and need to be complemented with improved public transport which is important in terms of reducing congestion and climate change.
7) Para 1.27 suggests that the district is planning to interfere with Neighbourhood Plans contrary to the founding principle of these plans. Potentially the District is forming an opinion which it will later have no right to uphold against the Parish.
8) With over 3,000 households on the housing register (para 1.51) and only 349 affordable homes being built on average each year it is obvious that the build rate must be increased and that a greater emphasis needs to be made on building affordable homes that meet the needs of the local community. (For more specifics see our response to H6 below).
9) Para 1.46 refers to the 35,025 residents who commute out of the Vale for work. More emphasis should be placed on providing employment within the Vale and developing local strategies to achieve this.
10) Para 1.57 says that Silverstone and Buckingham have "reasonable north bound access" to the M1 and M40 motorways. A more specific explanation would be useful here. The A413 north of Buckingham is not reasonable and using the A43 to reach the motorway is likewise not reasonable.
11) Para 2.4 leaves a number of questions. 2.4 (b) refers to "unmet needs from other housing areas", it is not clear what this refers to, other counties, other districts or other parishes. 2.4(h) refers to active links between Winslow station and Buckingham, presumably a bus service? With regards to the provision of a new settlement, the first in Buckinghamshire since Milton Keynes in 1961, it is hoped that this will be built to the same standard as an independent town and not compromised by trying to reduce the cost and tacking it on to an existing settlement.
12) Para 2.6.1 talks about a more intensive use of existing sites. This can only be done where appropriate, ensuring that the rural character of settlements is maintained and that neighbourhood plans are respected. Transport infrastructure includes public transport something that is so often forgotten or at the bottom of the list. AVDC need to ensure that public transport, which is vital in the rural areas, is an integral part of the planning structure, along with BCC. We note that for point 7, on the issue of climate change, no reference is made to public transport.
13) It is hoped that the aims (para 3.15) of minimising the need to travel and optimising sustainable means of travel by maintaining and enhancing the roles of Aylesbury, Buckingham, Winslow, Wendover and Haddenham in the Vale's settlement hierarchy is actually adhered to. This will require investment in public transport and investment in creating employment opportunities.
14) S1 needs qualification. It commits the LPA to do everything possible to approve a proposal, regardless of merit. It makes no mention of taking into account Neighbourhood Plans. Para's 3.17 and 3.18 then acknowledge that even with VALP in place it will still not be possible to meet the required five year housing land supply requirement even with phasing in the early years. Is there any evidence to suggest that this is a proposal which would be acceptable to the Planning Inspectorate or is it the case that despite this 'plan' we will still be subject to speculative applications from developers? The concern is that, despite an up to date Local Plan, developers will anticipate that because of the lack of a demonstrable current 5 year housing land supply that Planning Inspectors at Appeals will approve applications that are in conflict with VALP because of the 'presumption in favour of sustainable development?'
15) WTC does not agree with the proposed spatial strategy. The distribution between Aylesbury and rural areas is fundamentally flawed (see also WTC's response to Settlement Hierarchy). Without taking into account Buckingham, the percentage growth in rural north-east corner of Vale will be almost three times that proposed for Aylesbury! Growth of 50% in Strategic settlements appears entirely arbitrary. The level of planned growth adjacent to MK seems unsustainable.
16) The differences in the percentage growth levels between settlements seem somewhat arbitrary. There are large settlements with almost the same population as two of the strategic settlements and small settlements restricted to 5% growth which could accommodate more as they are strategically located (e.g. Whaddon is in 5% category but growth will actually be 375% whereas Great Brickhill which is equally close to MK will only be 5%)
17) There is a clear and recognised need for a specific Policy to prevent coalescence. What is stated in Policy S3 'Settlement Hierarchy and cohesive development' and in Policy D4 – Section b) is inadequate. Winslow has the hamlet of Shipton on its doorstep which is currently geographically separate from the town and should remain so. Paragraphs 3.26 to 3.29 have some robust statements regarding the prevention of coalescence, and would seem to rule out the joining together of Little Horwood, Great Horwood and Winslow (and therefore a new settlement at Winlsow), but unfortunately this is not reflected in Policies S3 or D4. Communities and AVDC need a Policy which is detailed and substantive to argue the point at an application's determination and at an Appeal Inquiry to prevent community coalescence. What AVDC is suggesting would leave them naked in defending the non-coalescence argument.
18) WTC welcomes the proposal to release green belt land at Wendover / Halton.
19) Note that in Paragraph 3.43 which defines and details the term infrastructure, which "covers a wide variety of services and facilities provided by private and public bodies," does not include mention of Shops, Banks, Post Offices, Pubs, Restaurants, Council facilities etc. Surely an error for these not to be included.
20) We note that growth will be accompanied by delivery of infrastructure, services and facilities in the right place at the right time. (Para 2.4 d), and that 'new settlement' will be under development (para 2.4 h 6). This second statement does not suggest that the new settlement will only be developed if there is a proven need.
21) The Oxford to Cambridge Expressway, mentioned in Paragraph 3.63, is only a 'study to investigate,' so AVDC cannot and should not, as they appear to have done, justify major growth in the north of the district (Northern Vale) as being sustainable, reasonable and practical because of a much improved East/West road, as this 'project' lacks any certainty of when delivery will be during the Plan period, nor what the route will be, nor even if it will be delivered by 2033. If as the Plan seems to suggest, Aylesbury is at the heart of the London – Oxford- Cambridge 'golden triangle' then that's where the Oxford to Cambridge Expressway should run through and that's where the major development should be. WTC believes that in the strategic interests of Aylesbury Vale the best route for the Expressway would be via A4146/A418 and not the A421. This would link Aylesbury into the Oxford – Cambridge 'knowledge arc' and support the housing growth at Aylesbury. Wheras a route via Winslow would ensure that all benefits go to MK (and would also require 35-40k of entirely new road in open countryside).
22) A disproportionate amount of the housing development requirement in the draft VALP is proposed for the north of the district, in spite of the fact that it is not well connected to major road corridors of the road network and there are no firm plans to deliver road improvements to either the A413 north of Aylesbury nor the A421 west of the bottle dump roundabout prior to 2033. In spite of this, VALP proposes that the Northern Vale (including Buckingham) should deliver either 9,800 new homes i.e. 28.1% of the District's total or, including the new settlement, 14,300 new homes which would be 41% of the District's total. In the past, the Northern Vale has delivered 22% of the District's growth. The 'unmet need' portion of the housing growth is 12,000, representing 36% of the District's total, which emanates from neighbouring LPAs bordering the south of the Vale. So what are the figures for the Southern Vale which 'relates more strongly to higher-value markets and the unmet housing needs in Districts to the south' and has historically delivered 18% of the District's housing growth? With Aylesbury now due to deliver only 45.4% of the District's growth, where in the VALP Issues and Options the indication was that it would deliver 51% against a historical 60% of the housing growth of the District, that leaves us with the Southern Vale delivering 26.5% of the total if the new settlement were to be located at Haddenham – 8,900 new homes and only 13.4% if the new settlement is located north of Winslow – 4,500 new homes. The facts speak for themselves – the Northern Vale has poor transport provision, it is relatively remote from the Districts which are generating the very significant unmet housing needs figure in the draft VALP total, the proposition that with the new settlement the Northern Vale would be expected to deliver almost as much housing growth as Aylesbury, all add up to one conclusion, namely that the level of housing growth being demanded in the VALP of the Northern Vale is both unreasonable and unrealistic.
23) S5 is clear in stating "infrastructure is provided in a comprehensive way in line with new development" and yet there seems to be no plans for this to be the case in reality. This is most obvious when looking at transport. The transport section makes no reference to road changes/improvements or public transport enhancements. The EWR and the Expressway are not due until the early 2020's and so will not be delivered in line with new development. There is also no minimum scale given to this statement, it is vital that however small the development any additional burden placed on the community must be supported with extra infrastructure.
24) Clarity is also needed on how the 25% of the CIL contributions due to Neighbourhood Plan communities will be distributed.
25) It needs to be noted that East West Rail brings only limited benefits in terms of supporting sustainable development and is already five years behind delivery schedule. Latest projection for services is 2022 (at the earliest) not 2020 as shown in draft VALP. There will be very little benefit in terms of travel to MK as the rail station is not close to either employment centres or the retail hub. While EWR will improve journey to Oxford for limited number of people, the links to Cambridge and further east are a very long way off and of little relevance to Winslow residents. Likewise, the proposed journey time to London (74 mins from Winslow) is no incentive for relocation to this area. (c.f. Bicester 46 mins / Leighton Buzzard 30 mins / Haddenham 40 mins / Aylesbury 60 mins.)
26) It appears that the approach to be taken to Gypsy and Traveller sites provision is that AVDC will take the easy way out and make many of the illegal pitches permanent, many of which are in open countryside and therefore in theory where planning permission should not be permitted, instead of advocating the obvious and practical approach of developing smallish sites on large housing developments, including the new settlement. As stated in Paragraph 3.65, when referring to the provision of suitable sites for Gypsies and Travellers, "it is important to ensure that development is located in the most appropriate locations," which obviously precludes sites in open countryside.
27) Regarding Policy S9, as with S1, the stricture that "should a Neighbourhood Plan not progress to submission within a year of the adoption of the Local Plan, the Council will implement the reserve sites set out in the plan," appears somewhat draconian. It really does not allow communities which await the adoption of the Local Plan in order to ensure certainty as to the strategic figure fornew homes delivery to 2033 in their community, before embarking on a neighbourhood plan, (an approach supported by AVDC in the past) it is quite likely that there will not be sufficient time to ensure their plan will have reached the submission stage in 12 month period specified. A period of 18 months rather than 12 months would appear more reasonable and in the scheme of things to 2033, the extra 6 months will be of little or no consequence.
Strategic Delivery
28) The 'Delivering a new settlement' (4.27) section offers a welcome alternative to simply adding on to an existing settlement. As the NPPF says "The supply of new homes can sometimes be best achieved through planning for larger scale development".
29) Para 4.43 states a number of objectives for a new settlement which clearly cannot be met at Winslow. Primarily the objective that the development "ensure infrastructure facilities and services are delivered in the right place at the right time". As infrastructure is likely to be funded by the development it will naturally have to follow afterwards. Similarly the first objective refers to the need "to ensure that housing development is accompanied by employment". Presently there is a deficit of employment opportunities in Winslow relative to the population, and this plan gives no suggestions as to how this would be rectified with the arrival of new settlements. With so many heavyweight factors overwhelmingly favouring the choice of Haddenham rather than Winslow as the location for the new settlement, why was the term 'marginally preferable' used in Para 4.35? What possible factor(s) could irrationally turn matters on their head and conclude that Winslow could suddenly be the better option? See separate report on the New Settlement Scoping Study prepared by Winslow Town Council.
30) What is the rationale for the huge (4,135) increase in housing close to Milton Keynes? Milton Keynes Unitary Authority has more undeveloped land to the east of the M1 than is occupied by the whole of the existing city of MK. Including areas such as Whaddon and Newton Longville (and potentially Winslow and the Horwoods) will only serve to encourage the western expansion of MK. Ultimately this will be to the detriment of Aylesbury Vale as these communities will relate more and more to MK and not Aylesbury, nor to those 'unmet need Authorities.'
31) In the 'Delivering the allocated sites' section for large and medium villages, there is no mention of those with well advanced Neighbourhood Plans such as Wingrave, which are likely to be 'made' before VALP is considered for adoption and the housing delivery numbers of those NPs. NB It is recognised that to base the housing delivery target for one's NP upon an emerging Local Plan is potentially fraught with danger at an Appeal Inquiry.
32) What is the rationale and the evidence base for the mere 3% difference between the target housing growths for medium and large villages? Heading the large villages is Aston Clinton with over 3,800 residents, followed by Edlesborough, Long Crendon, Pitstone, Stone/Bishopstone/Hartwell, Weston Turville and Wing all with over 2,500 residents and all these obviously because of their size have good infrastructure provision (schools, shops, good bus services, a range of community facilities etc) that many of the medium villages can only dream of. Contrast these large villages with the likes of Cuddington – pop. 650, Gawcott/Lenborough – pop. 900, Ickford – pop. 690 and North Marston – pop. 700, some of the smaller 'medium villages' with minimal facilities. As the basic demographic growth over the 20 year period has been identified by AVDC at 15%, a figure of 19% for the medium sized villages is not unreasonable as it only covers a little more than their own anticipated growth in demand for new homes. What is highly suspect is asking the larger, very sustainable villages to only provide 22% growth. The fact that Aston Clinton is not expected to provide more than its existing commitments surely proves the point. This community is well able and should provide more homes than a mere 22% increase to 2033, as should other large villages. A minimum of 30% housing growth would seem more just and equitable for these large villages, if not a minimum of 35%.
33) D4 makes no mention of a Settlement Boundary or anything similar. The Neighbourhood Plan needs to be referred to.
34) In the 'Delivering sites at smaller village' (4.85-4.87) section, it can be agreed that on average the smaller villages will have a new housing growth need to purely meet their own requirements during the Plan period of about 15% (the baseline demographic growth identified by AVDC for the Plan period). The 5% increase on housing stock therefore looks unreasonably low when the district wide growth figure is 45%. Where is the evidence that underpins this growth figure? The evidence we see in the table in this section makes it abundantly clear that many of the smaller villages in the Vale are well capable of delivering far more than 5% housing growth to 2033. 38% of the smaller villages (17 out of 45) have been identified as already meeting the 5% growth figure via completions and commitments and VALP still has 17 years to run! It is not rational to state only 3 years into the Local Plan that 17 villages "do not require further sites" and "only permit approximately x homes" for many others, which is tantamount to confirming that planning permissions will not be granted for applications for new homes beyond the 5% cap. It must make sense to allow smaller villages to grow at a rate relevant to their individual needs and aspirations. To constrain the likes of Calvert Green, Dinton, Great Brickhill, Oakley, Soulbury etc to 5% housing growth appears unjustified and unreasonable. What would be wrong with stating that the increase in the housing stock for small villages should be a minimum of X%?
35) In D9 'Provision of employment land,' there is mention of live-work developments. It is anticipated that nationally the need for live-work units will steadily increase. In order to avoid 'uncertainty' in relation to planning applications for a change of use to a live-work unit, AVDC would be strongly advised to include a clear definition of what constitutes a live-work unit in the final version of VALP in order to eliminate inevitable uncertainty. Also, live-work does not appear in the Glossary with a definition.
36) 4.106 refers to the importance of community services and local facilities and the strategy to protect local shops, pubs and post offices to prevent the decline of communities. This also needs to make reference to the local Parish or Town Council office which is at the heart of the localism agenda, and offers the best opportunity to improve the local community. Likewise an extensive list of community facilities in 11.16 makes no mention of the local council office.
37) D10, in a similar vein to S1, seems to suggest that any proposals for town centres will be approved regardless of merit and the wishes of the local community. It needs to be made clear that high-grade retail needs to be given priority and that residential use should be a last resort. For strategic communities in particular, most of which are expected to grow by 50% by 2033 and will therefore have a very significantly higher population at the end of the Plan period than currently, which will undoubtedly increase demand on our High Streets, it will be vitally important to resist changes of use of existing retail units on the High Street. There does not appear to be recognition in the draft VALP of this issue accompanied by the necessary robust Policy. Section I3 states that the council will "resist proposals for the change of use of community buildings and facilities" the same assurance should be given that the council will protect retail buildings. This would go some way towards supporting the statement in 4.110 that Aylesbury Vale District Council recognizes the need for retail growth in communities and will encourage it.
38) In 5.7, the simple statement that affordable homes should be in groups of no more than 15 to 18 is totally unacceptable, another instance AVDC where one size does not fit all. At 31% affordable homes contribution, a 48 home development would/could have a single cluster of 15, clearly a single cluster for such a site would not constitute the spirit and principle of the original guidance, by Government of seamless distribution. For a 480 home development it would be 10 x cluster of 15 and for a 2,400 homes development it could be 41 x clusters of 18. This is not the way to achieve 'seamless distribution of affordable homes throughout a development.' Cluster sizes need to reflect the scale of the development, not have a blanket cluster size irrespective of the scale of the development. For the 48 home development a cluster size of 5 would be reasonable, for 480 perhaps 10 and for 2,400 why not 30? The oft used excuse that the Housing Associations insist on this large cluster size is not correct. They do not want pepper potting but are amenable to cluster sizes that reasonably relate to the size of the development.
39) Policy H4 requires some qualification on the size of a replacement dwelling to be permitted. We suggest a footprint no larger than twice the size of the existing dwelling.
40) There is clear evidence from discussions in Winslow (between aspiring self-builders, WTC, AVDC and developers) that there is a need for the development of a SPD for self/custom build housing.
41) Policy H6 Housing mix – There is a justified perception that too often AVDC has simply approved the housing mix proposed by developers, even when these are in direct conflict with the needs of the district and the community and this is still happening. Recently, an application for over 40 homes in a medium sized village with a made Neighbourhood Plan, which included a Housing Needs Survey which identified the housing mix that community needed, firstly had confirmation that AVDC had approved what was described at the call-in Public Inquiry as a "good housing mix," when all the market housing was to be 4 and 5 bed homes, in direct contravention of an up to date Housing Needs Survey. Then the application was approved, hence the call-in. In July of this year, Winslow was informed that for the largest site for new homes detailed in their Neighbourhood Plan, AVDC had approved the following housing mix for the largest and most important site for housing identified in the NP:-
Type Aff. Rent Aff. Part Ownership Market
18 x 1 Bed Flats 18 0 0
39 x 2 Bed Flats 18 21 0
41 x 2 Bed Houses 11 0 30
58 x 3 Bed Houses 16 0 42
85 X 4 Bed Houses 0 0 85
This represents 68% of the affordable homes as flats when the recommendation is 15%. There are no market 1 and 2 bed homes when the recommendation is 22%. 54% of the market housing would therefore be for 4 bed homes when the recommendation for 4 and 5 bed market homes is 27.5%. Clearly these examples are unacceptable, particularly when the premier planning document of the Development Plan in both instances is a made Neighbourhood Plan and it appears no regard was paid to these by the relevant Officers. The very worrying fact is that currently AVDC is supposed to be operating an approval system for the housing mix for a development very similar to that identified in H6, yet these appalling housing mixes continue to be foisted on communities. Obviously, the Policy needs significant improvement to ensure that it functions to ensure the Vale generates the housing mix it requires, based on Housing Needs Surveys and not what developers prefer. One immediate improvement that should be instituted is that where there is a made Neighbourhood Plan, AVDC should be obliged to consult with the relevant Parish or Town Council at an early stage, regarding the proposed housing mix in a new application for their comments. For Policy H6, for developments above a certain size, proportionate to the size of the community, 5% perhaps, the proposed housing mix for all such applications should be referred to all Parish and Town Councils for their comments. Who is in the best position to advise on the specific needs for housing in a community other than the Parish or Town Council? One realises that Officers need to take the bigger, pragmatic view on the needs of the wider District but it can surely be agreed that there is a place for the truly local input here.
42) It is very surprising indeed that there appears not to have been any effort to produce a figure for the net jobs growth for the Plan period. One would normally expect that a Local Plan would not only provide a target figure for the delivery of housing to 2033 but also a target for the new jobs to be generated to 2033 in what is designated as a 'growth area.' Surely a Local Plan must show that it is sustainable and a key element of that sustainability would be to show that its net employment growth should ideally reduce out-commuting from the Vale by 2033. Without a clear indication of a jobs growth target and therefore a seeming admission that AVDC did not wish to tackle this thorny issue, will this not invite criticism or worse from the Planning Inspector at the Examination? In a document of over 220 pages, does not a mere 5 pages devoted to Employment on employment sites speak volumes?!
43) Either in Policy E2 'Other employment sites' or in a separate Policy, there needs to be a robust protection of land designated for employment use which, when developed, will significantly address a community's lack of sustainability because currently there is a very significant under provision of employment on employment sites in that community. This is of particular importance for communities with Neighbourhood Plans which include Employment Policies. In the draft VALP, there does not appear to be clear recognition of this issue. If it is not addressed, one can envisage, with only Policy E2 to refer to, that there will be little to resist an application for example to utilise an employment site for a new supermarket and describing this as an alternative employment use.
44) An explicit policy statement is needed to ensure that designated employment sites will not be converted to residential use in strategic settlements such as Winslow where there is already a shortfall in local employment opportunities.
45) We endorse the proposal for "provision of ancillary facilities for employees in business, industrial and warehousing developments" (6.9). This sounds like good planning and makes life easier for everyone, especially working families. We suggest therefore that the first occurrence of 'appropriate' in Policy E3 should be replaced with 'encouraged'.
46) E5 needs to refer to the importance of the settlement boundary and the Neighbourhood Plan in any decisions taken regarding employment land.
47) Essentially it seems that there is no plan for creating employment opportunities, especially with regards to meeting the needs of local communities. Linking new employment to new housing is too simplistic. There are neighbourhoods which are already underprovided and need redress.
48) Policy E8 does not support tourist accommodation in smaller settlements. Many tourists would prefer to stay at accommodation in smaller communities. There are already many successful B&B operations in smaller communities. This could also prevent the conversion, and thereby preservation, of large country properties to hotels.
49) Surely appropriate evidence should be required for any proposal under Policy E9.
50) It is very concerning that only 8 pages are given to transport and the majority of these are focused on vehicle parking. There is no clear vision of how transport infrastructure will be developed to meet the extra demand put upon it with the arrival of over 30,000 homes. How this need is going to be met, through improved transport infrastructure, improved public transport or by some other means is not resolved.
51) Vehicle Parking – we were advised this was going to follow the BCC standards but it does not. Justification for different parking standards for Aylesbury compared with rural villages is obvious yet AVDC is again going down the track of 'one size fits all.' Also, there is no mention of garage provision and size. If residents don't use garages for parking but instead use it for storage should not the basic design of these houses be changed? See attached for details of BCC Parking Standards recommendations.
Built Environment
52) In light of more and more land being used for development it is an absolute must that new developments are well landscaped and that planting schemes put forward by developers are adhered to and actually carried out. More emphasis needs to be placed on good landscape design with large numbers of trees to break up the flat monotony of new developments.
53) The current wording of Policy BE2 may restrict opportunities for modern design and simply encourage developments which are a pastiche of historic local development, often with mixed period styles of dwelling.
Natural Environment
54) It interesting to note in 9.44 that "Trees and woodlands take many years to mature"but no mention of replanting them or replacing them elsewhere before they actually are mature. In regards to NE8 and where trees around sites are lost AVDC must ensure that replacement provision is carried out.
55) Policy NE6(a) is too restrictive. It needs to be reworded to allow wider community or leisure uses.
56) Policy C2 needs a provision to prevent or minimise light pollution from outdoor equestrian facilities.
57) A clear policy on the siting of wind turbines is required.
58) National housing statistics which confirm completions, housing starts etc do not include those new dwellings which result from the conversion of office space into new homes. Is VALP allowed to include such conversions to new homes in its delivery figures to meet its targets?
59) Page (294) (Maps). What is the rationale for adding parcels 109 & 110 west of Leighton Linslade to the green belt? This is a much contested development site is it not?
60) Planning guidance makes it clear that Local Plans should include detail on the provision of infrastructure and where this is not available indicate fall back positions. Several aspects of the Plan, depend on infrastructure delivery which is by no means certain. When can we expect to see the necessary detail in respect of infrastructure delivery?
61) We would like to see a statement to the effect that any additional housing (etc) delivered over and above the VALP requirements will be taken into account in subsequent revisions or plans. To do otherwise might be seen as penalising communities that voluntarily take on an additional share of the development burden.
62) There are other aspects of the Plan which rely on evidence which is yet to be published. Surely it would be very dangerous to proceed to submission without all of the evidence being available.
63) Can you assure us that submissions made during the consultation process will be responded to either by changes to reflect those submissions or explanations as to why they have not been acted upon? It is recognised, of course, that such responses would need to be 'generic' in nature rather than specific to every individual submission. Without clear responses it is likely that the same issues will be raised time and again including at Examination.
64) The published timetable for adoption of VALP seems to be extremely unrealistic. If the Plan is submitted in March 2017 then adoption sometime in mid to late 2018 would seem more likely than the published date of mid 2017.
Winslow Town Council September 2016
TOMKINS PARK AND ARBORETUM OPENS FRIDAY 19th AUGUST
TOMKINS PARK AND ARBORETUM OPENS FRIDAY 19th AUGUST
Last year Winslow Town Council acquired a five acre site in the heart of the town, known locally as The Paddock, using funds secured from the New Homes Bonus scheme. The land previously belonged to the Tomkins family who were long term residents of Winslow Hall which is immediately to the south of the site. Known locally as The Paddock, in recent times it has only been open to the public once a year for the Lions Club Annual Firework Display. A collection of specimen trees grow within the site and a recent survey described them as an arboretum of regional status. Among the many superb trees is a Laurel Leafed Oak which is the only one known to be in Buckinghamshire.
Sadly the woodland has not been managed too well in recent years and several trees became dangerous or were affecting the growth of more important species. These trees have now been removed to ensure public safety and drainage installed to resolve a waterlogging problem in one area. This has been the first stage in developing the site as a town park which all of the community can enjoy. New pedestrian access gates have been installed in Elmfield Gate and from Greyhound Lane Car Park and these will be opened to the public from around noon on Friday 19h August. The double gates behind the Public Hall will only be opened for maintenance and emergency vehicles.
Commenting on the opening Cllr Roy van de Poll said, 'There is still much work to be done to develop the park but we wanted families to be able to have access before the end of the school holidays. If the weather holds it will be a great place for picnics'. In the coming weeks and months information boards will be installed next to the most important trees. Footpaths, suitable for buggies and wheelchairs, will also be developed. Some new planting will add colour and extra ground cover in the wooded areas.
Cllr van de Poll added, 'Later this year an official opening ceremony will see the site re-named as Tomkins Park and Arboretum in memory of Sir Edward and Lady Tomkins who were such great supporters of community activities in Winslow and did much to develop the arboretum'.
Further Updates On Challenges By Gladman Developments
Appeal By Gladman Developments Ltd Against Refusal Of Their Planning Application Ref 13/02174/Aop For 100 Homes East Of Little Horwood Road
On 26th February, the Town Council was advised of the excellent news that the above appeal had been dismissed by both the Planning Inspector – John Felgate and the Secretary of State – The Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP.
Mr Felgate made the following key observations:-
- On balance therefore, I conclude that in NPPF terms the development would not constitute sustainable development.
- The development would be visually harmful to the distinctiveness of the landscape, and to the setting and character of the town itself.
Mr Felgate also fully agreed with previous inspectors who had described the Little Horwood Road as fulfilling the role of a strong defensible boundary, providing a crisp separation between the urban edge of the town and open countryside. A boundary that he made clear should be maintained and protected.
In the letter received, the following were detailed as the Secretary of State's main reasons for proceeding with the notification of his decision and the decision itself to dismiss the appeal.
- The Secretary of State decided that it would not be appropriate to delay the decision on this case pending the outcome of legal proceedings in relation to that Plan
- He agrees that the sharp transition from town to countryside, particularly on the east of Winslow is a valued feature of the town's character, and that the proposed development would appear as incongruous, intrusive and on the 'wrong' side of the most obvious and logical boundary. As such the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the development would be visually harmful to the distinctiveness of the landscape, and to the setting and character of the town itself
- The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the relationship of the site to the hamlet of Shipton, and the potential consequences in terms of ultimate coalescence with Winslow, reinforces the conclusion that the development now proposed would have an adverse effect on Winslow's landscape setting and the character and appearance of the area
- He considers that the appeal proposal conflicts with the Winslow Neighbourhood Plan Policy 2 which designates a settlement boundary for the purposes of directing future housing and states that proposals for housing in settlement boundary will only be granted in exceptional circumstances, and conflicts with Neighbourhood Plan Policy 3 which states that proposals for housing development outside the boundary will not be supported unless they require a countryside location and maintain the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside. The Secretary of State considers that these policies are very important policies in the Neighbourhood Plan which seek to shape the development in Winslow and that granting planning permission would undermine the spatial strategy. For the reasons given in this decision letter, the Secretary of State does not consider that the exceptions in Policy 2 and 3 have been shown. He considers that the conflict between the appeal proposal and the Neighbourhood Plan is significant.
- Neighbourhood planning gives communities direct power to develop a shared vision for their neighbourhood and deliver the sustainable development they need. Neighbourhood planning provides a powerful set of tools for local people to ensure that they get the right types of development for their community. Outside the strategic elements of the Local Plan (which is not up to date in Aylesbury Vale District), neighbourhood plans will be able to shape and direct sustainable development. The Secretary of State regards this purpose as more than a statement of aspiration. He considers that neighbourhood plans, once made, are part of the development plan and should be upheld as an effective means to shape and direct development in the neighbourhood planning area in question. It is clear that, where a planning application conflicts with a neighbourhood plan that has been brought into force, planning permission should not normally be granted. In view of the Framework policy on neighbourhood planning, the Secretary of State accords significant planning weight to the conflict with the neighbourhood plan policies which designate a settlement boundary, even though its policies relevant to housing land supply are out of date in terms of Framework paragraph 49. He considers that this adds to the already compelling rationale to dismiss the appeal.
Yet another very clear decision supporting the community's Neighbourhood Plan and the wishes of Winslow's residents.
Gladman Developments Ltd's Judicial Review Of The Winslow Neighbourhood Plan And Subsequent Developments
Late last year, Mr Justice Lewis handed down his judgement on Gladman Developments' legal challenge to our Neighbourhood Plan and criticisms of certain aspects of the way in which Nigel McGurk examined the Winslow Neighbourhood Plan. On the six grounds of challenge, the judge was unequivocal in dismissing them all.
In his conclusion, Mr Justice Lewis stated
A neighbourhood development plan may include policies relating to the use and development of land for housing in its neighbourhood even in the absence of any development plan document setting out strategic housing policies. The examiner was therefore entitled to conclude that the draft Neighbourhood Plan satisfied the requirement in paragraph 8(2)(e) of Schedule 4B to the 1990 as it was in general conformity with such strategic policies as were contained in the development plan documents. The examiner was also entitled to conclude that the Neighbourhood Plan, which provided for 455 new dwellings in a sustainable way, did make a contribution to the achievement of sustainable development and satisfied the condition in paragraph 8(2)(d) of Schedule 4B to the 1990 Act. The examiner did have regard to national planning policy, including the Framework and the Planning Practice Guidance, and the further guidance referred to in that guidance, and was entitled to conclude that it was appropriate to recommend that the Neighbourhood Plan should be submitted to a referendum. He was entitled to conclude that the strategic environmental assessment report satisfied the requirements of EU law so that the condition in paragraph 8(2)(f) of Schedule 4B to the 1990 Act was satisfied. He gave adequate, intelligible reasons for his recommendations.
In summary, therefore the examiner was entitled to recommend that the draft Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to a referendum. The Council was entitled to make the Neighbourhood Plan in the light of the vote in favour of the Neighbourhood Plan at that referendum. Consequently, the Winslow Neighbourhood Plan is lawful. This claim for judicial review is therefore dismissed.
Earlier in his judgement he commented as follows:-
Winslow Town Council ("the Town Council") took up the opportunity offered by the Localism Act 2011 and undertook the process of preparing a neighbourhood development plan for their neighbourhood. They established a steering group of members of the council, and co-opted willing and experienced local residents onto the steering group. They undertook extensive consultation in accordance with the relevant regulations. They prepared a variety of documents over a considerable period of time. These included a consultation document, a site assessment report, a state of the town report and strategic environmental assessment scoping report and a strategic environmental assessment report. In the light of that, they prepared a draft Neighbourhood Plan. The commitment shown, and work done, by the residents of Winslow in the preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan are impressive.
Unsurprisingly, Gladman Developments Ltd (GDL) sought permission of Mr Justice Lewis to challenge this judgement and, as previously reported, this was refused.
GDL then addressed a request to the Court of Appeal for permission to challenge the decision of Mr Justice Lewis. The Town Council was recently notified that the Rt Hon Lord Justice Sullivan has granted permission for the appeal to be heard, a Hearing will be arranged but probably not until the autumn, to progress this matter.
The reasons he gave for his decision were as follows:-
The judgement of Lewis J was both impressive and highly persuasive, but even if the Grounds of Appeal, as amplified in the Appellant's Skeleton Argument do not have any real prospect of success, they are properly arguable and there is a compelling reason for granting permission to appeal: the proper interpretation of both the legislation and the national policy guidance governing the relationship between Neighbourhood Development Plans and local development plan documents raises wider issues that are of considerable public importance.
Hopefully 2015 will see an end to Gladman's series of legal challenges and allow this community to proceed, unhindered by legal uncertainties, with progressing its Neighbourhood Plan to fruition.
Gladman Developments Latest
- At January 20, 2015
- By TownClerk
- In Important News, Latest News, News & Events
- 0
Also on 14th January, the Town Council was notified that Gladman Developments Ltd had submitted an application to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal Mr Justice Lewis's decision to, on all grounds, dismiss the Judicial Review, which claimed that the Winslow Neighbourhood Plan was unlawful for six principal reasons and then refused Gladman's application to him for permission to appeal his decision on 18th December 2014 stating – The interpretation is clear and there is no prospect of an appeal succeeding on facts.
Earlier this month, the Town Council was advised that Gladman had indeed submitted a legal challenge to the Secretary of State's decision to dismiss their appeal against AVDC's refusal to grant planning permission for 211 homes on the Glebe Farm, Verney Road, Winslow site and that the Secretary of State's legal team will be contesting this challenge.
The Paddock
On 14th January, 2015 draft contracts for the purchase of the Paddock were exchanged and signed on behalf of the Council and a cheque was raised in payment to the solicitors, a completion date is now awaited.
This is a very significant step forward for our community as this five and a half acres of land in the middle of the town is where it is planned, as in the Neighbourhood Plan, to site the new Winslow Community Centre and a town park. The Winslow Bowls Club has been located on part of this land for many years on a long-term lease.
The purchase price and improvements needed to make the area suitable for public access are covered by a £200,000 grant from AVDC's New Homes Bonus fund, applied for by the Town Council.
Subject to a completion date on the purchase, it is planned that work on the site to make it suitable for public access will start later this year.
However, it will be a few years before the planned new Community Centre will be up and running, a project estimated to cost in the region of £3.0 million.
Secretary Of State Dismisses Appeal By Gladman Developments at Glebe Farm
On 21st November, the Town Council was notified of the Secretary of State's decision regarding the appeal by Gladman Developments against AVDC's decision to refuse planning permission for up to 211 homes on the Glebe Farm site which he had recovered, enabling the final decision by him. The Inspector who conducted the Public Inquiry recommended that the appeal be allowed and planning permission granted subject to conditions. However, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles MP, disagreed with the Inspector's recommendation, dismissed the appeal and refused planning permission.
The key factor in arriving at his decision is the Winslow Neighbourhood Plan, in particular Policy 2 relating to the Winslow Settlement Boundary (WSB) as the Glebe Farm site lies outside the WSB. The Secretary of State (S o S) concluded that there was significant conflict between the appeal proposal and the Neighbourhood Plan as a whole and, as he has done in other similar situations, found in favour of the Neighbourhood Plan. The full decision document can be found via this link at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/planning-applications-called-in-decisions-and-recovered-appeals.
Mention was made in the S o S's letter of a separate note being attached setting out the circumstances in which the validity of the Secretary of State's decision may be challenged by making an application to the High Court within six weeks from the date of his letter. We understand Gladman intend to make such a challenge.
Judicial Review Latest
Gladman Developments Limited's legal challenge concerning the Winslow Neighbourhood Plan, where Aylesbury Vale District Council is the defendant, will be held in the Royal Courts of Justice in London on 11th and 12th of December. About 18 residents will be attending on both days. The judge's decision is not expected for about two months.


text:
Sorry you're having a bad experience. Tell us how we can improve...
Not ?
We're excited to introduce you to our brand new site! All the great deals from DealChicken, plus more than 50,000 free coupons from 20,000 more local merchants!
We're excited to introduce you to your new local savings and gift certificate center!We've added offers and listings for over 20,000 local merchants and grown by 109 cities.
What are we asking? Linking accounts means we will allow your Facebook account to access your existing Local Flavor account.
For security purposes, we require you to simply log in with your email and password to confirm this is the account we should link to Facebook.
Warning: If you click NO, but you already have an existing account (with a different email address, for example), you will end up with two different accounts.
Or you can create a brand new Local Flavor account using the info from your Facebook.
Oops, We need your Phone
Philly's Best has been serving their award-winning Philly cheesesteaks and hoagies in Southern California for over 20 years. They use only the freshest ingredients to prepare their steaks, hoagies and chicken sandwiches - including genuine Amoroso rolls shipped directly from Philadelphia.
When new offers are available from this business.


text:
I was in the dorm making my bed when suddenly I get this urge to walk into the forest see I sense everything just like a vampire I have the improved senses but I don't have speed although I do though have maximised strength. I walk towards the forest seeing a girl on the ground her eyes had rolled back into her eyes and she started shaking when she came back she was sweating.
"Are you okay?" I ask her
"I need help" she replied I thought so should I ask her to the dorm? I think
"Did you say something?" she says
no i thought testing if she could here me. yes you did! tell the truth! she screams in my head. "Aha! you can do the mind talking thing too!!!" I shout startling her
"What?" she replies completely confused


text:
McCamly Plaza Hotel
No prices found through our partners. Please contact the business directly or check some of our recommended alternatives.
How has this hotel rated in the past?
- Shuttle bus service
- Swimming pool
- Restaurant
- Free High-Speed Internet
- Room service
- Wheelchair accessibility
Photos of McCamly Plaza Hotel
Travelers also looked at:
- Swimming pool
- Restaurant
- Bar/lounge
- Fitness/Health center
- Free High-Speed Internet
- Wheelchair accessibility
- Shuttle bus service
- Room service
- Business Services
TripAdvisor Reviews McCamly Plaza Hotel Battle Creek
Travel Blogs from Battle Creek
Everyone Come to the County Fair !
One of our favorite things to do is to visit local County Fairs. We've been watching for months now and, it's not been the season. However, when we got to Michigan, we found two fairs...one ...
Ohio, Ohio, Ohio...
... was light to moderate, so all-in-all it wasn't a stressful day, just very, very long.
After we pulled in and dropped the trailers, Cindy and I spent some time doing some cleaning, especially the floors. The rain that has toyed with us on this trip meant that the last several campsites were muddy, so we needed to sweep and mop the floors in the trailer. The cabinets and appliances needed a good wipe down as well, so ...
... done but she was so slow i got Eric to bring clothes and make up when he collected me and I changed in the car on way to rehearsal and dinner!!! Not the top with the bows but the one with the tassels but who would know...
Rehearsal dinners are an odd tradition - having been a bridesmaid 5 times I've never done it in Australia - but at least we met the bride before the wedding itself. ...
Post China Physical
... China. Then I realized I shouldn't be discouraged because maybe I was just weaker. I was right...the "much heavier" bag was actually 3 pounds under weight. That was a sign.
I went to the gym Monday to assess the damage. Warming up on the treadmill resulted in a neck cramp...not off to a good start. Also gravity seemed to have gotten stronger here in the States while I've been gone...or the metal in the dumbbells ...
Divine Appointment (Gift Cards #20-24)
... follow them.
Inside, discerning from their answers, I knew that these folks didn't have a personal relationship with Jesus. But they were both very convinced that they were good people. And yes, humanly speaking they were. In fact, the reason we were even there was because they were good people who put in the effort to meet with us. But God was putting in the effort to meet with them, and were a part of it.
In short, I didn't feel like it was the time to ...


text:
mypetmove precisava de um novo design de logo e criou um concurso na 99designs.
Um vencedor foi selecionado entre 26 designs enviados por 9 designers freelancers.
We need a logo designed for a pet-related niche Twitter feed site, which will have a listing of dog, cat and other pet tweets.
Please incorporate pets and the blue Twitter bird into the logo, as wellas either TwitPets or TwitPets.com. Logo needs to look good sized in a 100 px by 100 px square or smaller.
- Bright colors
- Twitter bird
- Other animals/"pet" themes
- TwitPets.com or TwitPets wording in logo
- can easily be sized down or has a part of it which can be featured in a small square (like the "T" in Twitter)
Anything busy or dark.


text:
LT315/50R24 Tires
Not seeing the tire type you are looking for? Use the tire search above to view the right tire size. If you are interested in discovering how choosing different wheel and tire sizes will effect your vehicle's performance, use our tire size calculator and learn your choices. You may also Call us at 888-410-0604. Our friendly tire experts can help you get any tire size available online.
How It Works
Shop Largest Tire Selection
Every Brand. Every Size.
Delivered 2-4 Days
Installed By You or an Expert
Nitto :
Terra Grappler
- Part Number: 200370
- Service Description: 123 R
- Sidewall: BW
- Load Range: E (10 Ply)
$632.99 per tire
$2,531.96 Set of 4
You are eligible for Instant discount per tire when you ship these tires to one of our Local Installers.
This tire is available in your area and we'll pass the savings on to you. Receive 100% when you ship these tires to one of our Local Delivery partners.


text:
Role of Flood Disturbance in Natural Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) Population Maintenance in an Estuary in South Texas, USA
- First Online:
- Received:
- Revised:
- Accepted:
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-010-9338-6
- Cite this article as:
- Pollack, J.B., Kim, HC., Morgan, E.K. et al. Estuaries and Coasts (2011) 34: 187. doi:10.1007/s12237-010-9338-6
- Citations
- 415 Downloads
A 2-year period with flood versus drought conditions provided the opportunity to examine the effects of flood disturbance on subtidal eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica biology and population dynamics in a south Texas estuary. Oysters were sampled monthly in 2007 and 2008 to examine the impacts of changing environmental conditions on oyster populations. Oysters were also examined quarterly for the presence of Perkinsus marinus. Filtration rates were calculated as a function of oyster size, temperature, salinity, and total suspended solids. Flood events in 2007 caused temporary reductions in salinity and were associated with reductions in oyster abundance, spat settlement, disease levels (weighted prevalence and percent infection), and filtration rates. Oyster populations had generally recovered within 1 year's time—the oysters were younger and smaller but were just as abundant as pre-flood levels. The rapid return of oysters to pre-flood abundance levels is attributed in part to the ability of oysters in Gulf coast estuaries to spawn multiple times in a single season and in part to their relatively high growth rates. Although flood disturbance may temporarily reduce or destroy oyster populations, the ability of the Mission–Aransas Estuary to retain freshwater pulses within the system and maintain low salinities that are unfavorable for predators and disease can facilitate oyster population recovery. Episodic flood events appear to play a critical role in promoting long-term oyster population maintenance in the Mission–Aransas Estuary. The response of oysters to changing environmental conditions over the short term provides some insights into the potential long-term effects of changing climate.


text:
A plague for the Paladin
Growing up under the guise of Church of The One, Gabriel becomes a Paladin, a Champion who begins a fight with the plague bearers, werewolves who strike out at the surrounding towns. He seeks there source and finds it, but at what cost...
Gabriel sat on the ground, crying. He was but four years old and his mother lay dead in the next room, prostrate upon her bed. His father was dead too, lying in the street outside the door, unless the plague priests, the Atwans, had already picked the body up.
His sister, two year old Annabel, was sick too, she had been up all night coughing. Gabriel had given her the last of the thick syrup that his mom had given him when he had been sick, but it had not seemed to help. She now was resting in the bed they shared next to where there parents lay.
A loud knock on the door to the two room shack caused him to jump. Answering the door, he found a pair of Atwans standing over his father's corpse, another pair about to grab his father's feet.
"Is there any one else inside with the plague?" A scraggily looking man, his priestly robes covered in mud, asked.
Gabriel stared, eyes wide, tears at their corners, and nodded. The scraggily looking man, and his companion, a tall, broad shouldered door of a human being, pushed past him as the other two dragged his father away.
"In here," the unkept man said as he beat the other into the shared bedroom.
"My sister's not dead!" Gabriel shouted, running to the room where the larger man had just scooped her up and threw her over a shoulder.
"But she will be soon," coldly said the first Atwan. "Your mother is though." He left the room and returned with the other two priests from outside. The same two priests that had unceremoniously dragged Gabriel's father away now grabbed ahold of his mothers ankles and pulled her off the bed. A loud thud sounded as her head bounced off the floor.
Gabriel began to cry again at this and was surprised when, after everyone else had left the hovel, the large Atwan came back in and set his hand on Gabriel's shoulder.
"She can't feel it." He said, trying to comfort the young boy. "I'll be back around later if you are still here."
Later in that same day, the priest, who he now knew as Cailin, had come back and taken him to the temple, where he stayed in a room with three other boys for a fortnight, food being brought every morning and every night. The Atwan had told him that it was in case he was sick, he was not allowed to go near anyone. Of the four boys, he was the only one that made it out of the quarantine. The other boys had died less than a week in, Atwans coming to take the corpses away, ignoring him completely.
After the fortnight was over, Cailin had taken him out of the room and bathed him, something that Gabriel had only known when it rained. The water had been scented with cedar, for luck Cailin had said. He had also squeezed some milkweed into the water and finally sprinkled a few rosemary leaves into the bath. When he was finished, the water had almost been black it was so filthy. Thusly clean, Cailin had brought him new robes, a brown dyed linen, a smaller version of the robes the priests of the temple wore, which Gabriel promptly put on. He had then been fed. It was the same grue he had eaten for the previous fortnight, but somehow, in the freedom, it tasted better. During the cleaning and feeding, he asked repeatedly about his sister, but each query was met with a shaken head and a downturned eye.
Cailin had taken Gabriel under his wing and trained him in the ways of The One. Gabriel had grown up with fleeting memories of his parents, but a day had not passed where he did not think of his sister, prone as Cailin had scooped her up and taken her to die with the rest of the plague-ridden. His heart still jumped every time he encountered one of the females of the temple, hoping that someone else had taken her in, and they would re-unite one day.


text:
Converse Philippines releases two new sets of kicks in the market. One is the Converse Cons One Star Pro and the other is the Converse Jack Purcell Remastered in Seersucker.
The two new selections sports of Lunarlon technology for better sole comfort.
Converse Cons One Star Pro
Originating in 1974, the Converse Cons One Star was reintroduced in Fall 2015 as an essential skate sneaker and features updated technology for heightened comfort and purpose.
Cons traction rubber and a gusseted tongue make fit and feel and function for skateboarding and daily wear a priority, while the simple, yet iconic star logo stays true to the classic design.
Available colors: Sandy Chocolate
Suggested retail price: 4550
Converse Jack Purcell Remastered in Seersucker
The Converse Jack Purcell Remastered in Seersucker is a summery, breathable seersucker linen/cotton fabric to the classic Converse Jack Purcell silhouette. In addition to a mesh lining.
Converse Jack Purcell Remastered in Seersucker in white and inked are now available in Converse shops nationwide for Php 3,990.
Check out the newest Converse shoes and apparels through their official Facebook account or visit their website www.converse.com.phFOLLOW MY ADVENTURES ON:
Facebook: @LifestyleBucket
Instagram: @ReyBelen and @LifestyleBucket
Twitter: @ReyBelen


text:
3rd graders made their owls speak using our iPads and the app, ''FaceJack". See more of these amazing owls in our Artsonia gallery http://www.artsonia.com/schools/school.asp?id=1620
Ms Catie Haase
02/15/2012 16:12
Very cool! I am an art teacher in Wisconsin and found you via Pinterest. This is a great project. Thank you for sharing.
02/15/2012 17:10
Hi Catie,
03/14/2012 01:55
Visited many blog, I have to say I like your blog. With my ideas very consistent, so I like!
06/25/2012 17:16
Your projects are amazing! I have followed you projects on Artsonia over the past few years. I am so excited to see how you have been using apps on the iPad to digitally create the students art further, it is awesome!
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.


text:
Joe's Jeans
Joe's Jeans Men's Classic Fit Frasier Jeans
Ships from USA , delivers within 14-21 DaysAdd to wishlist
- Joe's Jeans
- Dark wash; classic fit
- Classic 5 pockets
- Subtle whisker detail
- 17" leg opening
- 34" inseam
- 8 3/4" rise
- Cotton
- Machine washable
- Imported
- Web ID: 87361487
Special Offers
Return Policy
No questions asked return or exchange*: items may be returned or exchanged for a full refund in the original form of payment or a Vogily Credit within 14 days after shipping. Your satisfaction is our biggest prize, so we do everything to ensure that you are happy with your purchase. All products are 100% authentic, procured from brands directly and are backed by our purchase protection with 10 times money back guarantee. *Please refer to the detailed return policy on the site for exceptions
Ships from USA , delivers within 14-21 Days


text:
Aston Martin has just gotten one step closer to building a crossover, as the British outfit has secured a 200-million-pound (about $306 million at today's rates) infusion of capital from its leading shareholders.
The money will allow Aston Martin to develop "a new vehicle based on the DBX concept," although just how closely the production model will adhere to the concept's styling is unclear. Andy Palmer, the company's CEO, also hinted at other models being added, thanks to the funds.
"This additional long-term funding, will enable us to add extra model lines and broaden our presence in the luxury market segment by the end of the decade. The DBX concept has generated interest far beyond our expectations," Palmer said in the attached statement. "The additional investment announced today will allow us to realize the DBX and other new luxury vehicles that will form the strongest and most diverse portfolio in our history."
It's unclear what these "other new luxury vehicles" will include. Previous reports have indicated a Lagonda-badged replacement for the aging Rapide will be added to the range, although considering the age of the rest of Aston Martin's lineup, it's a safe bet that at least some of this money will also be put towards vehicles beyond the new CUV and sedan.


text:
You are currently using an unsupported web browser.
We support the latest versions of these browsers:
If you have any problems while attempting to download a browser, you should contact your organization's system administrator.
For any questions related to Cvent, feel free to contact our Customer Care team.
Schloss Prielau is situated in the idyllic city of Zell am See in Austria. While Dr. Wolfgang Porsche owns the castle, it is a hotel these days. The estate was completely renovated and adjusted to the highest standards with the typical preciseness of Porsche.
We offer 2 suits, 6 double rooms an...
You must be logged in to view contact information for this supplier. Sign up for a free Cvent account today.


text:
Your complete canadian resource for a perfect trackday
Canadian circuits complete info, status and calendars
Corner-by-corner circuit info, tips and tutorials
Canadian racing and trackdays calendars, promoters and schools
Tech tips, what to prepare and how
Racing tips, tricks and tutorials
Your own Racer corner.
part of
Like us on
and follow us on
so you can see snapshots of the final progress and how the site will look like.
2017 © a concept by


text:
NZD/USD reversed from support zone
- NZD/USD reversed from support zone
- Next buy target - 0.6850
NZD/USD has been rising in the last few trading sessions – following the earlier sharp upward reversal from the support zone lying between the support level 0.6670 (low of the previous minor correction (iv)), lower daily Bollinger Band and the 50% Fibonacci correction of the previous sharp upward impulse from January. The upward reversal form this support zone created the daily Japanese candlesticks reversal pattern Morning Star.
NZD/USD is likely to rise further to the next buy target at the nearby resistance level 0.6850 (which reversed the previous minor correction (ii), as can be seen from the daily NZD/USD chart below).


text:
Property > UK > Gt Lon > Southall Area
Searches Related to
Property for Sale in Hanwell, LNDReal Estate on Oodle Hanwell Property Hanwell Commercial Property Hanwell Repossessions Hanwell Houses Hanwell Holiday Property Hanwell Farms Hanwell Garages and Storage
Property for Sale in Hanwell, LND(1 - 1 of 1)
£245,000 Two BR House, hanwell2 BR · Single Family · Hanwell, Gt LonA 1930's mid terrace property pleasantly located in the Cuckoo Estate Conservation area. The accommodation comprises of a lounge, large k...Over 4 weeks ago on Homes On SaleTools
- XTools
- Two BR House, hanwell for £245,000
- Respond
- Stop Fraud
- Report
- Learn More
- 1 …of 1 page
More Listings on Oodle Classifieds London Property | Birmingham Property | Leeds Property | Glasgow Property | Sheffield Property | Bradford Property | Edinburgh Property | Liverpool Property | Manchester Property | Bristol Property | Wakefield Property | Cardiff Property | Coventry Property | Nottingham Property | Leicester Property | Sunderland Property | Belfast Property. Oodle Classifieds is a great place to find used cars, used motorcycles, used RVs, used boats, apartments for rent, homes for sale, job listings, and local businesses.


text:
Quality Inn & Suites
No prices found through our partners. Please contact the business directly or check some of our recommended alternatives.
How has this motel rated in the past?
- Suites
- Room service
- Continental Breakfast
- Swimming pool
- Free High-Speed Internet
- Business Services
Travelers also recommend:
- More recommendations
- Swimming pool
- Free High-Speed Internet
- Wheelchair accessibility
- Free parking
- Pets allowed
- Suites
- Room service
- Continental Breakfast
- Business Services
- Kids activities or Babysitting
TripAdvisor Reviews Quality Inn & Suites West Bend
Travel Blogs from West Bend
Packing up to go
Leaving today but not flying until 5.20 got checked in. Will be 11.20 at home. Left hotel around 10.30. Called into Port Washngton for a couple of hours parked up. There was a market on. It was mainly veg and fruit. Very unusual looking pumpkins etc. No good buying anything now. But worth a look. We called at a cafe and had a sandwich and drink sitting outside. Left about 1.30 and set off for Chcago. Arrived at car rental n the airport ...
... outside of Ireland itself. Again, it is a huge property, similar in size to the CNE grounds. We spent an entire day there, immersed in all things Irish, You had choices from every type of Irish music, available on a half-dozen stages, Irish dancing, plays, cooking demos, readings, and top-flight talent. In our one day there, we saw the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Gaelic Storm, and the Irish Tenors, all free with admission. There were others ...
Our first Independence Day
... We waved and enjoyed the spectacle.
We then went to the park where there were lots of activities. Every year they have a duck race with proceeds going to children. There were lots of ducks already lined up, most of them dressed up and decorated. There were some plain ones so I inquired and found I could buy one for $10. My number was 248 in one of the early races. There was a small stream which was the children's fishing stream and ...
A weekend in the snow in Wisconsin
... different trails from beginner to difficult. It was great we only ran into one other person on the trail and he was cross country skiing with his dogs so he was kind of a blur as he went by. It was beautiful and peaceful. After snow shoeing we headed to Sun Burst to go sledding, but this wasn't your run of the mill sledding. They claim their hill is equivalent to a 25 story ...
Mobile Updates
... in Chicago, IL
Matthew Schlei likes this.
Mark Bromberg Thanks for the update!
February 5 at 8:01pm � Like
Beth Carlson I'm gonna leave a 5 star ****.
February 5 at 8:15pm � ...