text:
Danger and Ineffectiveness of Flu Vaccines
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Tuesday, June 03, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) Mercury tests conducted on vaccines at the Natural News Forensic Food Lab have revealed a shockingly high level of toxic mercury in an influenza vaccine (flu shot) made by GlaxoSmithKline (lot #9H2GX). Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million, or over 25,000 times higher than the maximum contaminant level of inorganic mercury in drinking water set by the EPA.(1)
The tests were conducted via ICP-MS using a 4-point mercury calibration curve for accuracy. Even then, the extremely high level of mercury found in this flu shot was higher than anything we've ever tested, including tuna and ocean fish which are known for high mercury contamination.
In fact, the concentration of mercury found in this GSK flu shot was 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury we've ever tested in contaminated fish. And yet vaccines are injected directly into the body, making them many times more toxic than anything ingested orally. As my previous research into foods has already documented, mercury consumed orally is easily blocked by eating common foods like strawberries or peanut butter, both of which bind with and capture about 90% of dietary mercury.
Here are the actual results of what we found in the influenza vaccine from GSK (lot #9H2GX):
Aluminum: 0.4 ppm
Arsenic: zero
Cadmium: zero
Lead: zero
Mercury: 51 ppm
All tests were conducted via calibrated, high-end ICP-MS instrumentation as shown in these lab videos.
Read more: http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_influenza_vaccines_mercury.html
Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million
0.5 parts per billion (ppb) mercury = Kills human neuroblastoma cells (Parran et al., Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 132-140).
2 ppb mercury = U.S. EPA limit for drinking water http://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/index.html#mcls
20 ppb mercury = Neurite membrane structure destroyed (Leong et al., Neuroreport 2001; 12: 733-37).
200 ppb mercury = level in liquid the EPA classifies as hazardous waste. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/mercury/regs.htm...
25,000 ppb mercury = Concentration of mercury in the Hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth in the U.S., from 1990-2001.
50,000 ppb Mercury = Concentration of mercury in multi-dose DTaP and Haemophilus B vaccine vials, administered 4 times each in the 1990's to children at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 18 months of age. Current "preservative" level mercury in multi-dose flu (94% of supply), meningococcal and tetanus (7 and older) vaccines. This can be confirmed by simply analyzing the multi- dose vials. [Letter Feb 2008] Mercury, Vaccines, And Autism: One Controversy, Much Propaganda---Michael F. Wagnitz
EXCLUSIVE: Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water
Tuesday, June 03, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) Mercury tests conducted on vaccines at the Natural News Forensic Food Lab have revealed a shockingly high level of toxic mercury in an influenza vaccine (flu shot) made by GlaxoSmithKline (lot #9H2GX). Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million, or over 25,000 times higher than the maximum contaminant level of inorganic mercury in drinking water set by the EPA.(1)
The tests were conducted via ICP-MS using a 4-point mercury calibration curve for accuracy. Even then, the extremely high level of mercury found in this flu shot was higher than anything we've ever tested, including tuna and ocean fish which are known for high mercury contamination.
In fact, the concentration of mercury found in this GSK flu shot was 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury we've ever tested in contaminated fish. And yet vaccines are injected directly into the body, making them many times more toxic than anything ingested orally. As my previous research into foods has already documented, mercury consumed orally is easily blocked by eating common foods like strawberries or peanut butter, both of which bind with and capture about 90% of dietary mercury.
Here are the actual results of what we found in the influenza vaccine from GSK (lot #9H2GX):
Aluminum: 0.4 ppm
Arsenic: zero
Cadmium: zero
Lead: zero
Mercury: 51 ppm
All tests were conducted via calibrated, high-end ICP-MS instrumentation as shown in these lab videos.
Read more: http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_influenza_vaccines_mercury.html
Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million
0.5 parts per billion (ppb) mercury = Kills human neuroblastoma cells (Parran et al., Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 132-140).
2 ppb mercury = U.S. EPA limit for drinking water http://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/index.html#mcls
20 ppb mercury = Neurite membrane structure destroyed (Leong et al., Neuroreport 2001; 12: 733-37).
200 ppb mercury = level in liquid the EPA classifies as hazardous waste. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/mercury/regs.htm...
25,000 ppb mercury = Concentration of mercury in the Hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth in the U.S., from 1990-2001.
50,000 ppb Mercury = Concentration of mercury in multi-dose DTaP and Haemophilus B vaccine vials, administered 4 times each in the 1990's to children at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 18 months of age. Current "preservative" level mercury in multi-dose flu (94% of supply), meningococcal and tetanus (7 and older) vaccines. This can be confirmed by simply analyzing the multi- dose vials. [Letter Feb 2008] Mercury, Vaccines, And Autism: One Controversy, Much Propaganda---Michael F. Wagnitz
About Dr. Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH
Medical Director Homefirst® Health Services
Assistant Medical Director AMI (Alternative Medicine Integration)
Medical Director Homefirst® Health Services
Assistant Medical Director AMI (Alternative Medicine Integration)
Mayer Eisenstein MD,JD,MPH
Don't Vaccinate Before You Educate
http://youtu.be/KACSED0Z0TE (video below)
Don't Vaccinate Before You Educate
http://youtu.be/KACSED0Z0TE (video below)
CDC: Current Flu Vaccine Not a Good Match for This Season's Viruses, Ineffective - See more at: http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/cdc-current-flu-vaccine-not-a-good-match-for-this-seasons-viruses-ineffective/
Could the Ineffective Flu Shot be Causing More Severe Flu Outbreaks, Including Deaths?
Can the Flu Vaccine Make the Flu Even Worse?
This is one question you will never see addressed by medical authorities is the U.S. or the mainstream media. Outside of the U.S., however, this question has been asked and studied, and it has also been studied by researchers within the U.S.
This phenomenon where the flu vaccine can actually make the flu worse was originally observed in mass in Canada during the 2008-2009 flu season. Researchers studied the issue for the next couple of years and concluded that the flu vaccine did in fact increase the severity of flu symptoms among those who were vaccinated (see: Study finds flu shot really did make people sicker.)
The same issue was studied in Hong Kong in 2012 by comparing a group of people vaccinated with the flu vaccine against a group that used a placebo. The researchers found that those who received the flu vaccine suffered 5.5 times more incidents of similar diseases (see: Study: Flu Vaccine Causes 5.5 Times More Respiratory Infections – A True Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Study.)
In 2013, a study conducted by microbiologist Dr. Hana Golding of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at Bethesda in Maryland showed that pigs vaccinated against one strain of influenza were worse off if subsequently infected by a related strain of the virus (see: Vaccination may make flu worse if exposed to a second strain.)
See also: Is Flu Vaccine Causing Increase in H1N1 Outbreaks? 5 Year Old Boy Dies from H1N1 Virus, Even Though He Was Vaccinated Month Before.
Read more at: http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/could-the-ineffective-flu-shot-be-causing-more-severe-flu-outbreaks-including-deaths/
She got sick with the flu on her 37th birthday, and after Christmas, she was dead
Blue Springs woman dies from flu at age 37; KU Hospital seeing high number of people hospitalized
Flu Vaccine and Pregnancy: A Dangerous Practice
Flu Shot for Pregnant Women? CDC Covers Up Influenza Vaccine-Related Fetal Deaths
Proof that Big Pharma Doesn't Care About Vaccine Harm
Dr. Oz Show: Thimerosal in Flu Shots – What He Got Wrong & What You NEED to Know!
Government Pays Compensation to 80 Flu Vaccine Injuries and Deaths
Flu Vaccine is the most Dangerous Vaccine in the U. S. based on Settled Cases for Injuries - See more at:http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/flu-vaccine-is-the-most-dangerous-vaccine-in-the-united-states-based-on-settled-cases-for-injuries/
Government Study: Flu Vaccine not Effective for Elderly – Death Rates Increased
Victims Crippled and Killed by the Flu Shot Compensated by U.S. Government
Tamiflu Deception - Learn The Real Truth
The Myth of Tamiflu: 5 Things You Should Know
Taking a flu vaccine is the most mislead and foolish thing you could do.
Flu vaccines don't work and they injure far too many people
Flu Vaccines are Toxic
Five Reasons Why I'll Never Get a Flu Shot
Could Flu Vaccines Cause Cancer?
Resent study shows Flu vaccines lower CD8-T Cell necessary for fighting cancer!
DO NOT BE FOOLED INTO BELIEVING THIS [Flu Shots Prevent Heart Attacks And Strokes]
A Shot Never Worth Taking: The Flu Vaccine ~ by Kelly Brogan, MD - See more at: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2013/11/27/a-shot-never-worth-taking-the-flu-vaccine-by-kelly-brogan-md/
Vaccine Court Settlements Mostly for Flu Vaccines Damage
There are several levels of appeal within the vaccine compensation act set up by Congress in 1986. Every claim starts with the Office of Special Masters, aka Vaccine Court. Then the appeal process can proceed to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and finally, the U.S. Supreme Court. Most claims, however, are 'shot down' at the Office of Special Masters.
According to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, from Fiscal Year (FY) 1989 thru FY 2014 there have been a total of 3,484 Compensable claims and 9,713 Dismissed claims—rejected—'shot down', left to suffer without any recourse plus apparent nullification of torte law that would apply to other businesses product liability damages, but not Big Pharma's vaccines! It looks like an almost 3-to-1 ratio: dismissed claims to compensated damages.
Here are the Dec. 5, 2013 report payout figures per HRSA:
Back on October 18, 2013, this writer posted an article about the Vaccine Courts total damages paid in the September 3, 2013 data:
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims (aka the vaccine court) paid out $2,569,336,538.59 for compensable claims and $104,202,681.85 for attorneys' fees representing those claims. The court paid another round of attorneys' fees for dismissed claims totaling $56,375,431.34, plus $15,190,454.29 for interim attorneys' fees. [1]
If I calculated rounding-off math correctly, the Vaccine Court paid almost $64 million [$63,796,836.] as compensation for 70 claims in just three months. Add to that the attorneys' fees, etc. and one can readily see that there's a huge problem with vaccines that's being kept from the unassuming and vaccine-ignorant public.
Read more:
Flu Vaccine is the most Dangerous Vaccine in the U. S. based on Settled Cases for Injuries
The last report issued in 2013 by the Department of Justice (Vaccine Court), for compensation made by the Health and Human Services for people injured or killed by vaccines, was released in December 2013, covering the period of 8/16/2013 through 11/15/2013. The report is available as a Power Point presentation here.
There were 139 claims settled during this time period, with 70 of them being compensated. So, just over 50% of the claims filed for vaccine damages were compensated during this period.
Once again, the greatest percentage of damages compensated were for the influenza vaccine, and most of those were for Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). Yet these facts, tucked away in a file on the Department of Health and Human Services website, are never reported in the mainstream media. So we will report them here. You can also read the report yourself in the Power Point file here.
Of the 70 cases compensated, 42 of them were for the flu vaccine, or 60% of the cases settled where compensation was awarded for injury or death due to the vaccine. The combined total of the other 40% of cases settled included the following vaccines: Hep B, Tetanus, HPV, DTaP, MMR, IPV, PCV, Hib, Meningococcal, Varicella, TD.
When you receive your "routine" annual flu shot, are you aware of these statistics?
Read more:
The Costs of Vaccine Damage: The Payout Figures
Catherine J. Frompovich
Vaccines are supposed to be safe according to the U.S. CDC/FDA, so how come the HRSA division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published Statistics Reports [1] for the period ending September 3, 2013 providing data verifying that vaccines cause damage and even kill?
The period covers fiscal years (FY) 1989 to FY 2013. There were 3,387 compensable claims—meaning those claims that received compensation or money, and 9,651 claims that were dismissed, an awful miscarriage of the original intent of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program created by Congress and Public Law 99-660, in this writer's opinion.
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims (aka the vaccine court) paid out $2,569,336,538.59 for compensable claims and $104,202,681.85 for attorneys' fees representing those claims. The court paid another round of attorneys' fees for dismissed claims totaling $56,375,431.34, plus $15,190,454.29 for interim attorneys' fees. Judging by attorneys' fees paid out, it looks like attorneys do pretty well, instead of injured claimants, i.e., those the court decides to dismiss.
Here is the nitty-gritty of the reports filed: Injuries, Deaths, Compensated, and Dismissed claims.
Read more:
Junk Science? Number 71: Big Pharma bias and inaccurate conclusions in vaccine research
The conclusions drawn in over 80 per cent of flu vaccine global research studies did not hold up to objective scrutiny, according to a report in the BMJ, March 2014. Huge inaccuracy levels like these rightly fuel serious skeptic concerns that flu vaccine benefits are often hyped.
The BMJ study, which looked at some 274 comparative studies on flu vaccination, found that only a mere 18 percent of the studies were deemed to actually prove what the articles claimed to be their findings!
Read more:
The Flu Vaccine: Something to Sneeze At ~ by Roman Bystrianyk
Vaccination, Evidence of Harm, Review the Research and Know the Dangers
Above is a prime example of the pharmaceutical denial, and failure to take any responsibility, and clearly this shows directly proof of the sham and scam flu vaccine quackery.
Did you read that statement, in the insert??? (It states, and you can read it again, below).
This indication is based on immune response elicited by Flulaval. There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval (1,14).
How can they say studies prove a 60% efficacy, when at the same time the package insert states that said statement???
The real math!
Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told)
Should this NOT be a sign of outright flu vaccine, QUACKERY? When they are injecting poisonous substances and known at times contaminated vaccines? Where is it at a point of potentially doing more harm than good being done? In the pharma world that point would never be reached, if the gullible public will still buy their snake oil and believe it worked. This is no different than when in the 1860's when "Old Bill" Rockefeller the traveling snake oil salesman sold Eugol from the side of a wagon, the itinerant pappy of John D. (the first) and a patent medicine showman, that used to palm off bottled raw petroleum on the yokels as a cure for cancer. Nothing much has changed today. Get the real story!
The following is part of the first chapter in "The Drug Story"
Chapter One -What Nujol Started
Also go to, The Real History of Modern Medicine, and The False Foundations of Modern Medicine pages, for more.
This is the same junk science that has been behind ALL vaccines from day one. When you recommend a vaccine for the whole world, (including pregnant women); should it not be tested within the population, for actual efficacy? Then as well to do that with a vaccine additionally containing thimerosal, and as well while making absolutely no advisement nor recommendation that pregnant women should receive only single dose vials or pre-filled prepackaged syringes without thimerosal; this is the height of reckless irresponsibility.
Flu Shot Not Tested on Pregnant Women – Newborn Babies Monitored for Birth Defects by Drug Company, (which it also states in the insert, by the way)
More pharmaceutical denial, failure to take any responsibility, and more sham and flu vaccine quackery scam.
This indication is based on immune response elicited by Flulaval. There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval (1,14).
e·lic·it (-lst) (an immune response?)
tr.v. e·lic·it·ed, e·lic·it·ing, e·lic·its
1. a. To bring or draw out (something latent); educe. b. To arrive at (a truth, for example) by logic.
2. To call forth, draw out, or provoke (a reaction, for example). See Synonyms at evoke.
Vaccination does not equal immunisation.
Here you have it in basic form, as to the inaccurate information and dishonesty aspect to their flu vaccine push every year.
Zero data provided as to any flu death the state claims was due to flu. Zero data on what strain of flu the specific person had, that died. You will perhaps get the age of the person or persons, and nothing more. Zero data on if the strain of flu the person died of, matched the vaccine strains for that year. How was that confirmation done; by PCR, or not? Zero data on if or not the person/s who died had the flu shot a significant and reasonable time before the death, and thus should have been protected. Zero data on if or not the person who died had been treated with the dangerous and known ineffective Tamiflu? Zero official data on the effectiveness in the real public sector. Would all this or any of it be important to know, in your judgement of if or not the flu vaccine was worth getting? Or should we instead be expected to only trust the word of the flu vaccine pushers and the CDC? Should the American public trust the vaccine program at all, due to the controversy existing at many levels. They would have you believe that only a conspiracy theorist would question them and their authority, but at the same time we can read the VAERS data, and know these vaccines are not safe, and know that VAERS represents only a known 1 to 10% reporting factor. WE know the CDC has NEVER been honest about their VAERS evaluations. WE can see the settlement data as to the federal vaccine court and see the payouts since 1989 have totaled over 2 billion dollars, which represents obviously only a fraction of what rightfully should have been paid out.
We can as well see that there are far better options available to combat the flu, that the medical side refuses to inform us about. Vitamin C and D, just to name two of them; which are proven to be a major help in resistance to viral and or bacteria pathogen related illness.
LIPOSOMAL ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C, (with adequate amounts of vitamin D3 information)
Did it ever occur to them that flu shots do not work at all; nor at least enough to be worth the risk of that kind of injected toxicity and with its effects of potential contamination from anything the vaccine is made from? These vaccines are NOT purified; as there is now way to actually accomplish that. The CDC and the FDA both know that, and as well of the potential health related consequences.
Study: Getting flu shot 2 years in a row may lower protection
Robert Roos News Editor
Mar 1, 2013 (CIDRAP News) – Experts are puzzled by a new study in which influenza vaccination seemed to provide little or no protection against flu in the 2010-11 season—and in which the only participants who seemed to benefit from the vaccine were those who hadn't been vaccinated the season before.
The investigators recruited 328 households in Michigan before the flu season started and followed them through the season. Overall, they found that the infection risk was nearly the same in vaccinated and unvaccinated participants, indicating no significant vaccine-induced protection, according to their report in Clinical Infectious Diseases. That contrasted sharply with several other observational studies that found the vaccine to yield about 60% protection during the same season.
In trying to figure out why the effectiveness was so low, the researchers sifted their data in different ways, said Arnold S. Monto, MD, of the University of Michigan, senior author of the study. "We discovered that if you separated out those that had not been vaccinated the previous year, you got percentages close to what were seen in the major vaccine effectiveness studies," he told CIDRAP News.
Read more:
2013-2014 Flu Vaccine Inserts
2012-2013 (Fluzone (Influenza Virus Vaccine Insert)
Screen shots of sections of the package insert.
Insert picture highlights of he 2012 Fluzone vaccine insert
Vaccine Package Inserts
Lets take a look at this.
The fact is that the masses ARE recieving the flu shots from a multiple dose vials, and irresponsibly the medical facilities, clinics, and pharmacies that provide those flu shots are NOT informing the person getting that shot that there is 25 mcg of thimerosal content in that shot. Pregnant women, same thing; irresponsibly in all of those places giving the flu vaccine, there are no medical personel informing the recipient of the vaccine, of what is in it. To claim that a known poison and neurotoxin is harmless or less harmeful, due to the claim of it being metabolised as ethylmercury verses methylmercury, should not in way way be reassuring as to toxicity; nor is there any source that has proven in any way, that claim.
You need to go to the unbiased sources to realize that any study that claims to significant effectiveness of a flu shot, is always connected to pharmaceutical companies or those who stand to profit from it. When large evaluations have been done including all or many of the main line studies, it is found that the only studies that show the real truth about the lack of effectiveness and benefit of the flu shots, are those are not connected to direct profit, or a biased interest in the promotion of the flu vaccine. Those studies of course show an entirely opposite story regarding effectiveness.
When you look at the ingredients in a flu shot and potential toxicity, and as well the chance for contamination from the sources the vaccine is made from; there enters from that point a balance where you really need to question if the flu shot over-all involves the potential for doing more harm than good. If you think it is not all about money and profits, think again. Modern medicine in general has never been about staying healthy; it is about selling chemical pharmaceuticals to alter an illness and/or disease condition that they really have no comprehension nor want to, about the root of the cause.
Influenza Deaths Hype vs Evidence, by Barbara Loe Fisher
Thirty-Six Thousand People Do Not Die Each Year from "Regular Flu" (Confirmed)
Vaccinating Healthcare Workers Doesn't Help Patients: Cochrane Study
Flu Shot ingredients
Vaccine Ingredients
Flu Vaccine Ingredients. (Alternative source as novaccine has been at times, down).
'Preservative-free' vaccines and flu shots still contain deadly toxins
What's really in vaccines? Proof of MSG, formaldehyde, aluminum and mercury
Maternal transfer of mercury to the developing embryo/fetus: is there a safe level? (Thimerosal contains ethyl- mercury)
More Vaccine Harm Studies
Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons
Was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season?
Greenmedinfo.com provides the public with an alternative medical and toxicological resource for ascertaining the true risks and/or unintended consequences of conventional medical interventions such as vaccinations.
The research below represents under-reported, minimized and otherwise overlooked peer-reviewed data on adverse effects associated with vaccination.
Full Text pdf studies regarding the harm of vaccines
Dissect the literature> ignore the studies funded by companies who have financial gain in vaccines!
Gardasil Studies
Flu Vaccine Studies
"Numerous studies support influenza vaccination of persons with egg allergy using modest precautions.
Evidence continues to mount that there is cross-talk between skin barrier defects and immune responses in patients with atopic dermatitis. "
Serological examination of IgE- and IgG-specific antibodies to egg protein during influenza virus immunization.
N. Yamane and H. Uemura
The concentrations of serum IgE (PRIST) and IgE- and IgG-specific antibodies to egg protein were determined in paired sera taken from students who had received influenza virus vaccine. Although persons who gave a history of allergy to egg or to chicken feathers were excluded, 10-16% of vaccinees possessed higher titres of serum IgE and IgE-specific antibody (RAST) to egg white (F1) allergen before vaccination. The titres of IgG-specific antibody to egg protein (ovalbumin and ovomucoid antigens) were negligible, and did not show any significant response after vaccination. In contrast, IgE-specific antibody to F1 allergen rose significantly in a considerable number of the vaccines. The results obtained indicate possible contamination of vaccine products with allergens of egg origin and a potential risk of allergic manifestation after influenza vaccination.
So obviously you can become IgE response allergic to anything in a vaccine. Latex included.
The Man-Made Food Allergy Epidemic (It's NOT just PEANUTS!!)
Peanut oil in vaccines behind widespread peanut allergy epidemic, (peanut oil FYI, intended obviously as an adjuvant booster, is NOT required to be listed on the vaccine ingredients list)
Up next, the latest 2013 flu season, flu vaccine scam misinformation. Found safe and effective for pregnant women.
Lets look at the next three and below articles. You are going to see statements made based on a said new New England Journal of Medicine study; statements that claim that the flu vaccine, even with thimerosal included; that it has now been found in this said study that it is safe and effective for pregnant women. This is of course absolutely preposterous, as we can as well see by all the related information and studies on this page. As well we can go right to the flu vaccine inserts themselves and see that no such safety studies have been done, on anything in relation to that said safety. So without that, and with the lack of those said studies; they have qualified it all as safe, based on this single study. Yet there curiously is as well no mention of Thimerosal, nor Thimerosal safety in the study; and they obviously as well have and are going to as get away with that as well. And everyone is to go on their happy way, believing that all this has been studied and found safe, the so called medical profession as well? You might know that they unquestionably believe anything that is put in front of them by a standard so called respected pharma connected medical journal. As you move on down the page you will as well see more refute of this said claim.
Flu Shot Tied to Healthy Pregnancy
Study Confirms Benefits of Flu Vaccine for Pregnant Women, (an obviously erroneous study done by The New England Journal of Medicine)
Flu shot safe for pregnant women, large study affirms
Here is the actual said NEJM study. Done by Center for Health Research-Southeast, Kaiser Permanente, where it seems lately they are sending it in for studies to cover their butts, for everything lately.
Neonatal outcomes after antenatal influenza immunization during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: impact on preterm birth, birth weight, and small for gestational age birth
Neonatal Outcomes After Antenatal Influenza Immunization During the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic: Impact on Preterm Birth, Birth Weight, and Small for Gestational Age Birth.
Rebuttal to the New England Journal of Medicine study, finding flu vaccines safe and effective for pregnant women.
So, lets look at this situation and the said study a little further; the said NEJM study. Let's give it what it really deserves, here.
The latest 2013 flu season, flu vaccine scam misinformation. Found safe and effective for pregnant women.
You a see statements made based on the said new New England Journal of Medicine study; statements that claim that the flu vaccine, even with thimerosal included; that it has now been found in this said study that it is safe and effective for pregnant women. This is of course absolutely preposterous, as we can as well see by all the related information and studies on this page. As well we can go right to the flu vaccine inserts themselves and see that no such safety studies have been done, on anything in relation to that said safety. So without that, and with the lack of those said studies; they have qualified it all as safe, based on this single study. Yet there curiously is as well no mention of Thimerosal, nor Thimerosal safety in the study; and they obviously as well have and are going to as get away with that as well. And everyone is to go on their happy way, believing that all this has been studied and found safe, the so called medical profession as well? You might know that they unquestionably believe anything that is put in front of them by a standard so called respected pharma connected medical journal. As you move on down the page you will as well see more refute of this said claim.
The obvious truth is that these people can spin the numbers any way they choose to, and few people will ever be the wiser; including the so called medical profession itself. Do you actually think they read these studies and make an actual scientific study analysis of this material and data? Rarely if ever.Do they ever actually compare that against any other available, non biased information? Never.
Here is the actual said NEJM study. Done by Center for Health Research-Southeast, Kaiser Permanente, where it seems lately they are sending it in for studies to cover their butts, for everything lately.
Neonatal outcomes after antenatal influenza immunization during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: impact on preterm birth, birth weight, and small for gestational age birth
Background. Influenza infection during pregnancy is associated with adverse fetal outcomes such as preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA). Maternal influenza immunization may prevent these adverse infant outcomes during periods of influenza circulation.
Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of live births within Kaiser Permanente (KP) Georgia and Mid-Atlantic States (n=3,327) during the period of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus circulation. Primary outcomes were third trimester preterm birth (27-36 weeks), birth weight, low birth weight (LBW, <2500 grams), and SGA.
Results. There were 327 (9.8%) preterm, 236 (7.4%) LBW, and 267 (8.4%) SGA births. Among H1N1-vaccinated mothers (n=1125), there were 86 (7.6%) preterm, 68 (6.4%) LBW, and 99 (9.3%) SGA births, and the mean birth weight was 3308.5 grams (95% CI: 3276.6-3340.4). Among unvaccinated mothers (n=1581), there were 191 (12.1%) preterm, 132 (8.8%) LBW, and 123 (8.2%) SGA births, and the mean birth weight was 3245.3 grams (95% CI: 3216.5-3274.2). Infants of H1N1-vaccinated mothers had 37% lower odds of being born preterm than infants of unvaccinated mothers (aOR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47-0.84). The mean birth weight difference between infants of H1N1-vaccinated mothers and infants of unvaccinated mothers was 45.1 grams (95% CI: 1.8-88.3). There was no significant association between maternal H1N1 influenza immunization and LBW or SGA.
Conclusions. Pregnant women who received H1N1 influenza vaccine were less likely to give birth preterm, and gave birth to heavier infants. The findings validate U.S. vaccine policy choices to prioritize pregnant women during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Feb 21. [Epub ahead of print]
Neonatal Outcomes After Antenatal Influenza Immunization During the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic: Impact on Preterm Birth, Birth Weight, and Small for Gestational Age Birth.
Richards JL, Hansen C, Bredfeldt C, Bednarczyk RA, Steinhoff MC, Adjaye-Gbewonyo D, Ault K, Gallagher M, Orenstein W, Davis RL, Omer SB.
Source: Center for Health Research-Southeast, Kaiser Permanente.
Background. Influenza infection during pregnancy is associated with adverse fetal outcomes such as preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA). Maternal influenza immunization may prevent these adverse infant outcomes during periods of influenza circulation.Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of live births within Kaiser Permanente (KP) Georgia and Mid-Atlantic States (n = 3327) during the period of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus circulation. Primary outcomes were third-trimester preterm birth (27-36 weeks), birth weight, low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g), and SGA.Results. There were 327 (9.8%) preterm, 236 (7.4%) LBW, and 267 (8.4%) SGA births. Among H1N1-vaccinated mothers (n = 1125), there were 86 (7.6%) preterm, 68 (6.4%) LBW, and 99 (9.3%) SGA births, and the mean birth weight was 3308.5 g (95% confidence interval [CI], 3276.6-3340.4). Among unvaccinated mothers (n = 1581), there were 191 (12.1%) preterm, 132 (8.8%) LBW, and 123 (8.2%) SGA births, and the mean birth weight was 3245.3 g (95% CI, 3216.5-3274.2). Infants of H1N1-vaccinated mothers had 37% lower odds of being born preterm than infants of unvaccinated mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, .47-.84]). The mean birth weight difference between infants of H1N1-vaccinated mothers and infants of unvaccinated mothers was 45.1 g (95% CI, 1.8-88.3). There was no significant association between maternal H1N1 influenza immunization and LBW or SGA.Conclusions. Pregnant women who received H1N1 influenza vaccine were less likely to give birth preterm, and gave birth to heavier infants. The findings support US vaccine policy choices to prioritize pregnant women during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.
Interestingly, they always make it so that no one can get a copy of the full study, without a paid subscription. They sure want to promote the and that study, but only the abstract? Why?
Here is another Canadian study done with some of the same study authors. This one states, in includes the pneumococcal vaccines, stating. We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Mother's Gift project, a randomized study designed to test the effectiveness of inactivated influenza and pneumococcal vaccines during pregnancy.
Neonatal outcomes after influenza immunization during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
Interpretation: During the period with circulating influenza virus, maternal immunization during pregnancy was associated with a lower proportion of infants who were small for gestational age and an increase in mean birth weight. These data need confirmation but suggest that prevention of influenza infection in pregnancy can influence intrauterine growth.
So having plump and heavy babies was the goal here? How does that work? Flu vaccines somehow give you a heavier baby, at birth? Wow, who would have known? And they proved that? What, are there Hulk Hogan steroids in the flu shot, or something?
Lets now go to the real and unbiased information we can find.
Obviously they as well never read THIS study right here, nor ever considered it.
[PDF] Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
Influenza vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is now universally recommended in the United States. We critically
reviewed the influenza vaccination policy of the CDCs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) and the citations that were used to support their recommendations. The ACIPs citations and the current literature indicate that influenza infection is rarely a threat to a normal pregnancy. There is no convincing evidence of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination during this critical period. No studies have adequately assessed the risk of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, and animal safety
testing is lacking. Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative present in most inactivated formulations of the vaccine, has been implicated in human neurodevelopment disorders, including autism, and a broad range of animal and experimental reproductive toxicities including teratogenicity, mutagenicity, and fetal death. Thimerosal is classified as a human teratogen.The ACIP policy recommendation of routinely administering influenza vaccine during pregnancy is ill-advised and unsupported by current scientific literature, and it should be withdrawn. Use ofthimerosal during pregnancy should be contraindicated.
Those by the way, were not exactly very supporting study statements as for the use of thimerosal containing flu vaccines; nor was it supportive generally of the recommendation made by the CDC, as to the the use of flu shots for pregnant women.
How about some more real life information.
There was a 4,250% increase in miscarriages and stillbirths connected with the introduction of the H1N1 vaccine in 2009, as recorded in the CDC's database . It as to the above study, was egregious enough when in 2010 the CDC, well aware of the increase, told OBGYNs there had been no increase in risk and to begin urging the seasonal flu shot, which by then contained the H1N1 vaccine. To now come out an claim there had actually been a decrease in risk is a an even bolder lie and therefore an injustice to all pregnant mothers and a palpable threat to their health and the health of their unborn babies. This is a crime against humanity. They have as well disregarded a long list of women who stated they believe their miscarriages were the result of the 09-10 H1N1 vaccine. When you read the accounts of that and in regard the time frames, the effects of the vaccine certainly do become all to suspect. The size of the study has been argued by some people, in stating that it that size was to small. However, as far as the CDC is concerned, they entirely ignored the data all together; which actually should have been significant, and fully deserved their attention to it. It received nothing! In fact just the opposite was claimed to that there was no evidence of harm known, whatsoever. VAERS means nothing to them, because they can always claim no matter what that there was no proof that it was the vaccine; and that there were no common links found. They have done exactly the same thing with the known unrecovered outcomes issue and the deaths situation with Gardasil. Nothing would be enough, as to admit any liability, would at this point, finish them. They know exactly how much vaccine truth activism is out there, and they know they remain on perilous ground to admit lack of effectiveness, the excessive harm done, or the failure of ANY vaccine.
4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women
CoMeD, (the said documents source)
Evidence Overwhelming that H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Causes Harm
Is The H1N1 Vaccine Safe? Shocking Stories From Pregnant Women Who Have Had Miscarriages After Taking The Swine Flu Vaccine
Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine, (another list)
Pregnancy, Flu Shots and Autism
Exposure. Entropy. 2012; 14(11):2227-2253.
Empirical Data Confirm Autism Symptoms Related to Aluminum and Acetaminophen
Seneff S., Davidson R.M., Liu J.
PDF Full-Text http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/11/2227/pdf
New Studies - Flu Shots May Cause Autism
Examining the ineffectiveness of flu vaccines... evidence!!!
Reassessing Flu Shots as the Season Draws Near
It's flu-shot season, and public health officials are urging everyone over 6 months of age to get one. Many businesses provide on-site flu shots, and some hospitals have told staff members that they have to wear masks if they do not get the vaccine. By 2020, United States health leaders want 80 percent of the population to get yearly shots.
For vaccine manufacturers, it's a bonanza: Influenza shots — given every year, unlike many other vaccines — are a multibillion-dollar global business.
But how good are they?
Last month,, in a step tantamount to heresy in the public health world, scientists at the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota released a report saying that influenza vaccinations provide only modest protection for healthy young and middle-age adults, and little if any protection for those 65 and older, who are most likely to succumb to the illness or its complications. Moreover, the report's authors concluded, federal vaccination recommendations, which have expanded in recent years, are based on inadequate evidence and poorly executed studies.
"We have overpromoted and overhyped this vaccine," said Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, as well as its Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance. "It does not protect as promoted. It's all a sales job: it's all public relations."
Dr. Osterholm, who says he is concerned that confidence in current vaccines deters research into identifying more effective agents, comes from the world of public health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A bioterrorism and public health preparedness adviser to Tommy Thompson, the former health and human services secretary, he served on the interim management team during a transition period at the C.D.C. in 2002.
"I'm an insider," Dr. Osterholm said. "Until we started this project, I was one of the people out there heavily promoting influenza vaccine use. It was only with this study that I looked and said, 'What are we doing?' "
Read more:
Former CDC official blasts flu vaccine as anti-science PR stunt
MB Comment: Michael Osterholm is a rare breath of fresh air in the stultified world of infectious disease specialists who are actually covert drug company puppets. Osterholm doesn't pull any punches from his perch at the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP). He is an opponent of ineffective flu vaccines.
Keep in mind that Michael Osterholm was on the management team that led the CDC until Julie Gerberding kicked many legitimate CDC scientists out before she jumped ship to running the Merck vaccine division. Gerberding stripped the CDC of everyone but pro-drug company stooges before she moved to Merck.
With that background in perspective, read Osterholm's comments about the bogus flu vaccine that has been thrust upon the US public this season like a lemon by the used-car salesmen at the CDC and in the public health sector.
One final note, Osterholm's organization CIDRAP concedes that a universal flu vaccine is at least 5-10 years away in the future. Get used to resisting the clarion call to receive the ineffective and toxic annual flu shot in America's stupid annual ritual to enrich vaccine manufacturers.
Michael Osterholm MinnPost Feb 25, 2013
"The thing that surprises me is why everybody is surprised" that the flu vaccine has been found to be so ineffective, Osterholm said …its protection may wear off within three months …
"What I worry about more than anything is the long-term credibility of science in public health," he said. "Will people trust us if they don't think that we're being honest and forthright with the public data? Are we becoming nothing more than the anti-science people?" …health officials should "be honest about what it is. Stop trying to spin it." …if we oversell it and make these statements that are just not true about how effective it is. Then we're doing exactly what the anti-science people are doing." …
"Public relation wishes and good will isn't going to get us one. We need a strategic and tactical plan. We have none.
Vaccinating Healthcare Workers Doesn't Help Patients: Cochrane Study
No Value in Any Influenza Vaccine: Cochrane Collaboration Study
The Truth About The Flu Shot, by Dr Sherri Tenpenny
The Truth About the Flu Shots in Pregnancy, by Dr Sherri tenpenny
Flu Shots For The Elderly Are Ineffective
Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told) http://www.naturalnews.com/033998_influenza_vaccines_effectiveness.html
Flu shots triple hospitalization rates in children - but don't expect any straight answers from the government
Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests
Flu vaccines judged ineffective
Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine
Flu Vaccines, pharma fraud, quack science, the CDC and WHO -- all exposed by Richard Gale and Gary Null
Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines
Is Flu Vaccine Safe or Dangerous for Pregnant Women?
The entire vaccine industry is being exposed for unproven assumptions and misrepresentations of data
Would THIS make you want to get a flu shot??? Your doctor didn't tell you this? They state that anyone that has an egg allergy shouldn't get the flu shot, right? So, additionally they don't tell you as well is that you can develop a said egg allergy you did not have before; by getting the flu vaccine. Oh is no big deal is it? Just trust the for CDC, and the to much to lose authorities for all you every need to know; right? This is reckless and irresponsible! Cherry picking the big pharma connected science, and disregarding all else.
The study states, quote: [The results obtained indicate possible contamination of vaccine products with allergens of egg origin and a potential risk of allergic manifestation after influenza vaccination.]
Serological examination of IgE- and IgG-specific antibodies to egg protein during influenza virus immunization.
N. Yamane and H. Uemura
The concentrations of serum IgE (PRIST) and IgE- and IgG-specific antibodies to egg protein were determined in paired sera taken from students who had received influenza virus vaccine. Although persons who gave a history of allergy to egg or to chicken feathers were excluded, 10-16% of vaccinees possessed higher titres of serum IgE and IgE-specific antibody (RAST) to egg white (F1) allergen before vaccination. The titres of IgG-specific antibody to egg protein (ovalbumin and ovomucoid antigens) were negligible, and did not show any significant response after vaccination. In contrast, IgE-specific antibody to F1 allergen rose significantly in a considerable number of the vaccines. The results obtained indicate possible contamination of vaccine products with allergens of egg origin and a potential risk of allergic manifestation after influenza vaccination.
So obviously you can become IgE response allergic to anything in a vaccine. Latex included.
The Man-Made Food Allergy Epidemic (It's NOT just PEANUTS!!)
Peanut oil in vaccines behind widespread peanut allergy epidemic
PEANUT OIL IN VACCINES BEHIND Widespread Peanut Allergy Epidemic
PEANUT OIL IN VACCINES BEHIND Widespread Peanut Allergy Epidemic
The History of The Peanut Allergy Epidemic - book
They simply refuse to comprehend that anything you put in a vaccine can potentially sensitize the person to that substance. Just because a substance exists in the environment, is eaten, or already exists in the human body, does NOT give a green light to inject that in a vaccine without safety testing. Gardasil has been another example of this ineptitude, in regard to their placement without testing, of L-histadine in the vaccine.
August 30, 2008
Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster
By Cynthia A. Janak
Flu is Vitamin D Deficiency Disease
Virol J. 2008; 5: 29.
Published online 2008 February 25. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-5-29
Vitamin D Signaling, Infectious Diseases, and Regulation of Innate Immunity
On the epidemiology of influenza. (Notice the reference to the deficiency of vitamin D)
Cannell JJ, Zasloff M, Garland CF, Scragg R, Giovannucci E.
Source: Department of Psychiatry, Atascadero State Hospital, 10333 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93423, USA.
The epidemiology of influenza swarms with incongruities, incongruities exhaustively detailed by the late British epidemiologist, Edgar Hope-Simpson. He was the first to propose a parsimonious theory explaining why influenza is, as Gregg said, "seemingly unmindful of traditional infectious disease behavioral patterns." Recent discoveries indicate vitamin D upregulates the endogenous antibiotics of innate immunity and suggest that the incongruities explored by Hope-Simpson may be secondary to the epidemiology of vitamin D deficiency. We identify - and attempt to explain - nine influenza conundrums: (1) Why is influenza both seasonal and ubiquitous and where is the virus between epidemics? (2) Why are the epidemics so explosive? (3) Why do they end so abruptly? (4) What explains the frequent coincidental timing of epidemics in countries of similar latitude? (5) Why is the serial interval obscure? (6) Why is the secondary attack rate so low? (7) Why did epidemics in previous ages spread so rapidly, despite the lack of modern transport? (8) Why does experimental inoculation of seronegative humans fail to cause illness in all the volunteers? (9) Why has influenza mortality of the aged not declined as their vaccination rates increased? We review recent discoveries about vitamin D's effects on innate immunity, human studies attempting sick-to-well transmission, naturalistic reports of human transmission, studies of serial interval, secondary attack rates, and relevant animal studies. We hypothesize that two factors explain the nine conundrums: vitamin D's seasonal and population effects on innate immunity, and the presence of a subpopulation of "good infectors." If true, our revision of Edgar Hope-Simpson's theory has profound implications for the prevention of influenza.
Excerpted from, Epidemic influenza and vitamin D
Mechanism of action of vitamin D, in relation to resistance to the flu.
The pathology of influenza involves a complex interaction between the virus, acquired immunity, and innate immunity. Macrophages rapidly release cytokines into infected respiratory tissue while virucidal antimicrobial peptides attempt to prevent viral replication [33]. The release of proinflammatory cytokines, as much as the virulence of the virus, may determine the clinical phenotype of influenza infection. Recent research confirms that the clinical phenotype of influenza correlates well with amount of cytokines released [34, 35]. Furthermore, the severity of the illness induced by genetically reproduced 1918 influenza virus also correlates with the ability of the virus to induce macrophage production of cytokines [36]. In avian influenza, the innate cytokine immune response can be overwhelming; levels of such cytokines are significantly higher in those with a fatal outcome [37, 38].
Recently, vitamin D has been found to modulate macrophages' response, preventing them from releasing too many inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [39, 40]. Vitamin D deficiency also impairs the ability of macrophages to mature, to produce macrophage-specific surface antigens, to produce the lysosomal enzyme acid phosphatase, and to secrete H2O2, a function integral to their antimicrobial function [41, 42]. The same authors found that the addition of 1,25(OH)2D increased expression of macrophage-specific surface antigens and the lysosomal enzyme acid phosphatase while stimulating their 'oxidative burst' function.
Perhaps most importantly, three independent research groups have recently shown that 1,25(OH)2D dramatically stimulates genetic expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) in human monocytes, neutrophils, and other human cell lines [43–45]. These endogenous antibiotics, such as defensins and cathelicidins, directly destroy invading microorganisms [46]. AMP display broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, including antiviral activity, and have been shown to inactivate the influenza virus [47–49]. Not only do neutrophils, macrophages, and natural killer cells secrete AMP, but epithelial cells lining the upper and lower respiratory tract secrete them as well, where they play a major role in pulmonary defence [50, 51].
Dr. John Cannell on vitamin D (video below)
Purity Products - Is 5,000 IU of Vitamin D per Day Too Much?
This is the eighth part of a 15 part Vitamin D series. Dr. John J. Cannell, Executive Director of the Vitamin D Council, sat down with Purity Products. Here he explains why 5,000 IU of vitamin d per day isnt too much.
Purity Products - Vitamin D Blood Levels
Vitamin D, by Dr Sherri Tenpenny
Vitamin D is better than ANY vaccine and increases the immune system by 3-5 times (video below)
Vitamin C As An Antiviral: It's All About Dose
Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins: Curing the Incurable, by Thomas E. Levy, M.D., J.D.
Here is a better choice, than a flu shot.
Vitamin D supplementation
Vitamin D Council recommended amounts
Based on the body's indicated daily vitamin D usage, Vitamin D Council recommends the following amounts of supplemental vitamin D3 per day in the absence of proper sun exposure. Due to the variable response discussed above, these are only estimated amounts.
Healthy children under the age of 1 years – 1,000 IU.
Healthy children over the age of 1 years – 1,000 IU per every 25 lbs of body weight.
Healthy adults and adolescents – at least 5,000 IU.
Pregnant and lactating mothers - at least 6,000 IU.
Vitamin D supplementation. (the adequate supplementation levels)
Biotics Research Bio-D-Mulsion Vitamin D3 -- 1 fl oz
2000 IU per drop
Short Description
• Micro-emulsion for enhanced absorption and utilization
• Provides significant improvements in serum levels
• Supplies 400 IU per drop of vitamin D3
Bio-D-mulsion forte from biotics research corporation supplies 400 IU per drop of vitamin D3 as a micro-emulsion for enhanced absorption and utilization, which is particularly important for those with malabsorption conditions. Clinical use of biotics' micro-emulsified vitamin D provides significant improvements in serum levels of 25-OH-vitamin D following supplementation.
400 IU per drop
Vitamin C As An Antiviral: It's All About Dose
An historical compendium of 20th-Century medical & scientific literature attesting to the efficacy of Ascorbate(Ascorbic Acid, Cevitamic Acid, Sodium Ascorbate etc. a.k.a. "Vitamin C")in the treatment and prevention of human and animal illnesses and diseases.
Vitamin C Historic References, check out for how long this has been a viable option.
Vitamin C Micro-Crystals
Vitamin C (mineral ascorbates) and Ascorbic Acid
This vitamin is the most important water soluble nutrient antioxidant. Its structure was determined by Nobel Laureate, Dr. A. Szent-Gyorgyi, who became a strong supporter of Dr. Linus Pauling in his views about the importance of this water soluble vitamin. According to Irwin Stone it should be considered an essential nutrient and that all humanity suffers from the deficiency disease he called hypoascorbemia. The amount present on our food is very low. There is enough so that we do not suffer scurvy. This does not mean that these small amounts will keep us healthy.
Read more:
Frederick R Klenner M.D.
Ancient History and Homespun Vitamin C Therapies
The Origin of the 42-Year Stonewall of Vitamin C, (and now is over 60 years)
Journal of Applied Nutrition Vol. 23, No's 3 & 4, Winter 1971
Observations On the Dose and Administration of Ascorbic Acid When Employed Beyond the Range Of A Vitamin In Human Pathology
Frederick R. Klenner, M.D., F.C.C.P.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, March 15, 2006
High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C: A Tribute to Fred Klenner
Vitamin C Cures by Dr. Fred Klenner
HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: The Pioneering Work of
Frederick R. Klenner, M.D., F.C.C.P
Vitamin C - Nutritional Medicine
Doctors and Healers using or promoting Diet & Nutrients
Fredrick Klenner
Dr Archie Kalokerinos MBBS PhD FAPM.
Still think its not real; and nothing to that vitamin C? Go here to the next page.
SmartMune, (good product)
This product makes complete sense to me, and backed by more real physiological/biological science than pharma will ever have as to the safety and effectiveness of any of their vaccines, to include the flu vaccine. They say 80% of immune function comes from and having a healthy gut flora and a healthy digestive system. How many children with ASD could also possibly benefit fro this product, in the process of recovery from the harm and damage caused the MMR vaccine, etc.?
Immunocal - Articles
Glutathione Review - Articles
PDR Information
Dosage and Administration
Bionaid™ Trioxysilver™ (antiviral)
Thieves Oil Provides Powerful Protection against Viruses and Bacteria
Home made Thieves oil
Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in schoolchildren
Mitsuyoshi Urashima, Takaaki Segawa, Minoru Okazaki, Mana Kurihara, Yasuyuki Wada, and Hiroyuki Ida
Results: Influenza A occurred in 18 of 167 (10.8%) children in the vitamin D3 group compared with 31 of 167 (18.6%) children in the placebo group [relative risk (RR), 0.58; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.99; P = 0.04]. The reduction in influenza A was more prominent in children who had not been taking other vitamin D supplements (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.79; P = 0.006) and who started nursery school after age 3 y (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.78; P = 0.005). In children with a previous diagnosis of asthma, asthma attacks as a secondary outcome occurred in 2 children receiving vitamin D3 compared with 12 children receiving placebo (RR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.73; P = 0.006).
Conclusion: This study suggests that vitamin D3 supplementation during the winter may reduce the incidence of influenza A, especially in specific subgroups of schoolchildren. This trial was registered at https://center.umin.ac.jp as UMIN000001373.
Nope, they are not going to recommend it... "ONLY, a drug can cure or prevent disease", the revolving door with the pharmaceutical industry, FDA. If its not producing a high dollar patent or drug, it is not acceptable. You know, that has passed all their multi-million dollar spin the clinical studies multiple end point numbers; and all those false proof of effectiveness studies.
Are vaccines causing RSV and other diseases
Vaccines And Immune Suppression.
Do Vaccines Disable The Immune System?
Vaccination does not equal immunisation.
Vaccines and neonatal immune development
Hilary Butler - Monday, May 23, 2011
VIDS – Vaccine Induced Diseases
"No Evidence of Any Link" 58 studies
Does any of this look like any sort of REAL health care? Or biologically and chemically toxic care?
Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary (Vaccine Ingredients)
Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine
This girl recently died due to influenza, and she had received the flu shot. Why is that not in published the major media?
A 5th person has died from flu complications in Minnesota. The latest, 14-year-old Carly Christensen from St. Louis Park. And we've learned Carly did receive a flu vaccination...
There are so many pathogens out there that can look like flu, and they are rarely testing for anything as to the particular strain of pathogen the person has encountered. Thus how hen would they even know what level of effectiveness the current years flu vaccine was having?
In regard to these articles. Why as well do they not do a study as to what strains are in existence in our communities? In those claimed flu cases they say they found and as well caused death, why can they not tell us as well if the person was actually vaccinated for the flu. None of them were? Really? And how many people died where the vaccine flu strain was not a match, or the vaccine simply did not protect them even though it was a match? Now that is and would be real vaccine information that would rightfully educate the public. The absurdity of that information not being available, and while they continue to push the largely failed flu shots, is just unbelievable. And NOW they are recommending the flu shot PLUS a booster. And the vaccine actually works, right; no significant issues? As the public falsely trusts that they have done all the professional investigation that is needed. They need to get a bit more honest, and about the information the public seriously deserves to have.
Flu epidemic strikes millions of Americans already vaccinated against the flu
Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told)
References Documenting Symptoms To Mercury Exposure
No science proves, right? Take a look! They lied.
Catalogue of Science/ Vaccine Adverse effects
And remember how they have been attempting to tell us that flu vaccines help prevent cardiac and stroke events? What a bunch of pharma connected study, crap!
Ask the question. HOW do they keep getting away with ignoring and denying the real and existing science, on ALL levels? How do they get away with not providing this kind of information to the public, who blindly line up by the 100's and 1000's for their flu shots that they believe have been thoroughly tested for safety and effectiveness.
Studies Find Flu Shots Can Harm Your Heart, Infant And Fetus
Over 200 viruses cause influenza and influenza-like illness which produce the same symptoms (fever, headache, aches and pains, cough and runny noses). Without laboratory tests, doctors cannot tell the two illnesses apart. Both last for days and rarely lead to death or serious illness. At best, vaccines might be effective against only Influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses." (Source: Cochrane Summaries).
Authors of this review assessed all trials that compared vaccinated people with unvaccinated people. The combined results of these trials showed that under ideal conditions (vaccine completely matching circulating viral configuration) 33 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to avoid one set of influenza symptoms. In average conditions (partially matching vaccine) 100 people need to be vaccinated to avoid one set of influenza symptoms. Vaccine use did not affect the number of people hospitalised or working days lost but caused one case of Guillian-Barré syndrome (a major neurological condition leading to paralysis) for every one million vaccinations. Fifteen of the 36 trials were funded by vaccine companies and four had no funding declaration. Our results may be an optimistic estimate because company-sponsored influenza vaccines trials tend to produce results favorable to their products and some of the evidence comes from trials carried out in ideal viral circulation and matching conditions and because the harms evidence base is limited..
Read more: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/studies-find-flu-shots-can-harm-your-heart-infant-and-fetus
Just another minor detail the CDC neglected to tell anyone!
J Intern Med. 2011 Jan;269(1):118-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02285.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
Inflammation-related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet activation and cardiac autonomic function.
Lanza GA, Barone L, Scalone G, Pitocco D, Sgueglia GA, Mollo R, Nerla R, Zaccardi F, Ghirlanda G, Crea F.
Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Conclusions. Together with an inflammatory reaction, influenza A vaccine induced platelet activation and sympathovagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance. Significant correlations were found between CRP levels and HRV parameters, suggesting a pathophysiological link between inflammation and cardiac autonomic regulation. The vaccine-related platelet activation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction may transiently increase the risk of cardiovascular events.
The four main areas of concern mentioned are:
Platelet Activation: An indicator of increased risk for pathological clotting and/or obstruction of a blood vessel, e.g. heart attack, embolism or stroke.
Sympathovagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance: An indication of disturbed autonomic regulation within the heart.
Elevation of C-Reactive Protein: An indicator of inflammation-mediated cardiovascular disease risk.
Reduced Heart Rate Variability: An indicator of increased heart disease risk.
Abstract Title:
Primary immunization of premature infants with gestational age<35 weeks: cardiorespiratory complications and C-reactive protein responses associated with administration of single and multiple separate vaccines simultaneously.
Abstract Source:
J Pediatr. 2007 Aug ;151(2):167-72. Epub 2007 Jun 22. PMID: 17643770
Abstract Author(s):
Massroor Pourcyrous, Sheldon B Korones, Kristopher L Arheart, Henrietta S Bada
Article Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA. email@example.com
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of cardiorespiratory events and abnormal C-reactive protein (CRP) level associated with administration of a single vaccine or multiple separate vaccines simultaneously.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study on 239 preterm infants at>or =2 months of age in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Each infant received either a single vaccine or multiple vaccines on one day. CRP levels and cardiorespiratory manifestations were monitored for 3 days following immunization.
RESULTS: Abnormal elevation of CRP level occurred in 85% of infants administered multiple vaccines and up to 70% of those given a single vaccine. Overall, 16% of infants had vaccine-associated cardiorespiratory events within 48 hours postimmunization. In logistic regression analysis, abnormal CRP values were associated with multiple vaccines (OR, 15.77; 95% CI 5.10-48.77) and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (OR, 2.28; 95% CI 1.02-5.13). Cardiorespiratory events were associated marginally with receipt of multiple injections (OR, 3.62; 95% CI 0.99-13.25) and significantly with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) (OR, 4.76; 95% CI 1.22-18.52).
CONCLUSION: CRP level is expected to be elevated in the 48 hours following immunization. In a minority of infants immunized, cardiorespiratory events were associated with presumed need for intervention. Underlying medical conditions and possibly multiple injections are associated with cardiorespiratory events. Precautionary monitoring following immunizations is warranted.
Article Published Date : Aug 01, 2007
Study Type : Human Study
Abstract Title:
Inflammatory responses to trivalent influenza virus vaccine among pregnant women.
Abstract Source:
Vaccine. 2011 Sep 20. Epub 2011 Sep 20. PMID: 21945263
Abstract Author(s):
Lisa M Christian, Jay D Iams, Kyle Porter, Ronald Glaser
Article Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Ohio State University Medical Center, United States; The Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, United States; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, United States.
OBJECTIVE: In the U.S., seasonal trivalent influenza vaccination (TIV) is currently universally recommended for all pregnant women. However, data on the maternal inflammatory response to vaccination is lacking and would better delineate the safety and clinical utility of immunization. In addition, for research purposes, vaccination has been used as a mild immune trigger to examine in vivo inflammatory responses in nonpregnant adults. The utility of such a model in pregnancy is unknown. Given the clinical and empirical justifications, the current study examined the magnitude, time course, and variance in inflammatory responses following seasonal influenza virus vaccination among pregnant women. METHODS: Women were assessed prior to and at one day (n=15), two days (n=10), or approximately one week (n=21) following TIV. Serum interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-reactive protein (CRP), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) were determined by high sensitivity immunoassay. RESULTS: Significant increases in CRP were seen at one and two days post-vaccination (ps<05). A similar effect was seen for TNF-α, for which an increase at two days post-vaccination approached statistical significance (p=.06). There was considerable variability in magnitude of response; coefficients of variation for change at two days post-vaccination ranged from 122% to 728%, with the greatest variability in IL-6 responsesat this timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: Trivalent influenza virus vaccination elicits a measurable inflammatory response among pregnant women. There is sufficient variability in response for testing associations with clinical outcomes. As adverse perinatal health outcomes including preeclampsia and preterm birth have an inflammatory component, a tendency toward greater inflammatory responding to immune triggers may predict risk of adverse outcomes, providing insight into biological mechanisms underlying risk. The inflammatory response elicited by vaccination is substantially milder and more transientthan seen in infectious illness, arguing for the clinical value of vaccination. However, further research is needed to confirm that the mild inflammatory response elicited by vaccination is benign in pregnancy.
Vaccine. 2011 Nov 8;29(48):8982-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.039. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
Inflammatory responses to trivalent influenza virus vaccine among pregnant women.
View the Evidence: Problematic Actions-More Existing Vaccine Studies (the CDC again and of course, failed to recognize)
Vaccination Information Service - Vaccine Ingredients
Vaccine Contamination (existing studies)
Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?
New Generation of Vaccine Adjuvants: Worst Ever?
Pubmed studies related to the adverse effect of aluminum adjuvants
Health Guides-Vaccine Research
Vaccination Agenda: An Implicit Transhumanism / Dehumanism
Study Calls Into Question Primary Justification for Vaccines
Docs Show Eli Lilly Knew Mercury In Vaccines Was Known Dangerous In 30's
Vaccines Are Not Mercury Free
Vaccine/ Autism Link is Not Fraud
Robert F. Kennedy on Thimerosal. Although this information is outdated, and being that Thimerosal has been removed (except for possibility of some flu vaccines) and from most childhood vaccines, with the exception of so called trace amounts left from manufacturing. Is THIS the CDC that you should trust to recommend for your child a schedule of vaccines that amount to now at least 49 does of 14 vaccines, before the age of 6.
Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Monday, July 2, 2012
GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data
So, in THIS study the reality shows that even though ethyl mercury may be excreted and or detoxed faster than methyl mercury, actually they both are potentially neuro-toxic and well potentially cumulative. How much ethyl mercury is left in the brain and other organs of the body, ir-regardless of the rate of assumed detox?
Arch Toxicol. 1985 Sep;57(4):260-7.
The comparative toxicology of ethyl- and methyl mercury.
Magos L, Brown AW, Sparrow S, Bailey E, Snowden RT, Skipp WR.
Neurotoxicity and renotoxicity were compared in rats given by gastric gavage five daily doses of 8.0 mg Hg/kg methyl- or ethylmercuric chloride or 9.6 mg Hg/kg ethylmercuric chloride. Three or 10 days after the last treatment day rats treated with either 8.0 or 9.6 mg Hg/kg ethylmercury had higher total or organic mercury concentrations in blood and lower concentrations in kidneys and brain than methylmercury-treated rats. In each of these tissues the inorganic mercury concentration was higher after ethyl- than after methylmercury. Weight loss relative to the expected body weight and renal damage was higher in ethylmercury-treated rats than in rats given equimolar doses of methylmercury. These effects became more severe when the dose of ethylmercury was increased by 20%. Thus in renotoxicity the renal concentration of inorganic mercury seems to be more important than the concentration of organic or total mercury. In methylmercury-treated rats damage and inorganic mercury deposits were restricted to the P2 region of the proximal tubules, while in ethylmercury-treated rats the distribution of mercury and damage was more widespread. There was little difference in the neurotoxicities of methylmercury and ethylmercury when effects on the dorsal root ganglia or coordination disorders were compared. Based on both criteria, an equimolar dose of ethylmercury was less neurotoxic than methylmercury, but a 20% increase in the dose of ethylmercury was enough to raise the sum of coordination disorder scores slightly and ganglion damage significantly above those in methylmercury-treated rats.
New Study Verifies Mercury In Flu Shots Is Toxic
New Study Verifies Mercury In Flu Shots Is Toxic
Integrating Experimental (In Vitro and In Vivo) Neurotoxicity Studies of Low-dose Thimerosal Relevant to Vaccines
José G. Dórea
There is a need to interpret neurotoxic studies to help deal with uncertainties surrounding pregnant mothers, newborns and young children who must receive repeated doses of Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs). This review integrates information derived from emerging experimental studies (in vitro and in vivo) of low-dose Thimerosal (sodium ethyl mercury thiosalicylate). Major databases (PubMed and Web-of-science) were searched for in vitro and in vivo experimental studies that addressed the effects of low-dose Thimerosal (or ethylmercury) on neural tissues and animal behaviour. Information extracted from studies indicates that: (a) activity of low doses of Thimerosal against isolated human and animal brain cells was found in all studies and is consistent with Hg neurotoxicity; (b) the neurotoxic effect of ethylmercury has not been studied with co-occurring adjuvant-Al in TCVs; (c) animal studies have shown that exposure to Thimerosal-Hg can lead to accumulation of inorganic Hg in brain, and that (d) doses relevant to TCV exposure possess the potential to affect human neuro-development. Thimerosal at concentrations relevant for infants' exposure (in vaccines) is toxic to cultured human-brain cells and to laboratory animals. The persisting use of TCV (in developing countries) is counterintuitive to global efforts to lower Hg exposure and to ban Hg in medical products; its continued use in TCV requires evaluation of a sufficiently nontoxic level of ethylmercury compatible with repeated exposure (co-occurring with adjuvant-Al) during early life.
What's really in vaccines? Proof of MSG, formaldehyde, aluminum and mercury
Scandal Exposed in Major Study of Autism and Mercury
NEW STUDY - "Mitochondrial Autism" is Real; Vaccine Triggers Cannot Be Ruled Out
Mitochondrial Disease in Autism Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Cohort Analysis
Although all patients' initial diagnosis was idiopathic autism, careful clinical and biochemical assessment identified clinical findings that differentiated them from children with idiopathic autism. These and prior data suggest a disturbance of mitochondrial energy production as an underlying pathophysiological mechanism in a subset of individuals with autism.
The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health
1 in 88 Children: A Look Into the Federal Response to Rising Rates of Autism
Synergistic Effects of Mercury with Other Toxic Metals: Extreme Synergistic Toxicity
Developmental, Cognitive, & Behavioral - Effects of Toxic Metals
Vaccine Safety Conference Session 16 Dr. Christopher Exley
Dr. Christopher Exley- The Systemic Toxicity of Aluminium Adjuvants.
Dr. Christopher Exley is the Reader in Bioinorganic Chemistry at The Birchall Centre, Keele University in Staffordshire and Honorary Professor at the UHI Millennium Institute. Exley is a biologist (University of Stirling) with a PhD in the ecotoxicology of aluminium (University of Stirling). His research career (1984-present) has focused upon an intriguing paradox; 'how the third most abundant element of the Earth's crust (aluminium) is non-essential and largely inimical to life'. Investigating this mystery has required research in myriad fields from the basic inorganic chemistry of the reaction of aluminium and silicon to the potentially complex biological availability of aluminium in humans. Exley is also fascinated by the element silicon in relation to living things which, as the second most abundant element of the Earth's crust, is also almost devoid of biological function. One possible function of silicon is to keep aluminium out of biology (biota) and this area of study forms a large part of Exley's research.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013 Jan 1;33(2):423-30. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121231.
Silicon-rich mineral water as a non-invasive test of the 'aluminum hypothesis' in Alzheimer's disease.
Davenward S, Bentham P, Wright J, Crome P, Job D, Polwart A, Exley C.
Source:The Birchall Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Abstract -excerpt
We have provided preliminary evidence that over 12 weeks of silicon-rich mineral water therapy the body burden of aluminum fell in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and, concomitantly, cognitive performance showed clinically relevant improvements in at least 3 out of 15 individuals. This is a first step in a much needed rigorous test of the 'aluminum hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease' and a longer term study involving many more individuals is now warranted.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2006 Sep;10(1):17-24; discussion 29-31.
Non-invasive therapy to reduce the body burden of aluminium in Alzheimer's disease.
Exley C, Korchazhkina O, Job D, Strekopytov S, Polwart A, Crome P.
Source:Birchall Centre for Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Science, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Abstract- excerpt
Drinking the mineral water increased significantly (P<0.001) their urinary excretion of silicic acid (34.3 +/- 15.2 to 55.7 +/- 14.2 micromol/mmol creatinine) and concomitantly reduced significantly P=0.037) their urinary excretion of aluminium (86.0 +/- 24.3 to 62.2 +/- 23.2 nmol/mmol creatinine). The latter was achieved without any significant (P>0.05) influence upon the urinary excretion of iron (20.7 +/- 9.5 to 21.7 +/- 13.8 nmol/mmol creatinine). The reduction in urinary aluminium supported the future longer-term use of silicic acid as non-invasive therapy for reducing the body burden of aluminium in Alzheimer's disease.
Session 22, The Vaccine Safety Conference: Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD, CCN
Vaccine Safety Conference videos - The evidence of vaccine harm. (More videos)
The verdict is out on flu shots. Many medical experts now agree it is more important to protect yourself and your family from the flu vaccine than the flu itself. Let's take a look at the reasons behind this verdict:
1.) There is a total lack of real evidence that young children even benefit from flu shots. A systematic review of 51 studies involving 260,000 children age 6 to 23 months found no evidence that the flu vaccine is any more effective than a placebo. Also the shots are only able to protect against certain strains of the virus, which means that if you come into contact with a different strain of virus you will still get the flu.
2.) Medical journals have published thousands of articles revealing that injecting vaccines can actually lead to serious health problems including harmful immunological responses and a host of other infections. This further increases the body's susceptibility to the diseases that the vaccine was supposed to protect against.
3.) Ever noticed how vaccinated children within days or few weeks develop runny noses, pneumonia, ear infections and bronchiolitis? The reason is the flu virus introduced in their bodies which creates these symptoms. It also indicates immuno-suppression i.e. lowering of the immunity. The flu vaccines actually do not immunize but sensitize the body against the virus.
4.) Its a known fact that Flu vaccines contain strains of the flu virus along with other ingredients. Now think about the impact such a vaccine can have over someone with a suppressed immune system? If you have a disease that is already lowering your body's ability to fight a virus, taking the flu shot will put your body in danger of getting the full effects of the flu and make you more susceptible to pneumonia and other contagious diseases.
5.) The Flu vaccines contain mercury, a heavy metal known to be hazardous for human health. The amount of mercury contained in a multi-dose flu shot is much higher than the maximum allowable daily exposure limit. Mercury toxicity can cause memory loss, depression, ADD, oral health problems, digestive imbalances, respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases and many more such serious health ailments.
And what about the elderly? Can the flu vaccine help them?
6.) There is mounting evidence that flu shots can cause Alzheimer's disease. One report shows that people who received the flu vaccine each year for 3 to 5 years had a 10-fold greater chance of developing Alzheimer's disease than people who did not have any flu shots. Also with age the immune system weakens, thus lowering your ability to fight off infections. Introducing the flu virus in the bodies of elderly could have dangerous consequences.
Can we trust the authorities who are promoting the wide-spread use of flu vaccines?
7.) The Center for Disease Control appoints a 15-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This committee is responsible for deciding who should be vaccinated each year. Almost all the ACIP have a financial interest in immunizations. It's all about the money and may have very little to do with your health and well being. The very people pushing these vaccines stand to make billions of dollars. This itself creates a doubt on how effective these flu vaccines really are?
8.) Research shows that over-use of the flu-vaccine and drugs like Tamiflu and Relenza can actually alter flu viruses and cause them to mutate into a more deadly strain. Couple this with drug resistant strains and you have virtually no benefits with much risk.
9.) There is enough evidence that shows that the ingredients present in the flu vaccinations can actually cause serious neurological disorders. In the 1976 swine flu outbreak, many who got the flu shots developed permanent nerve damage. Flu vaccines can contain many harmful materials including detergent, mercury, formaldehyde, and strains of live flu virus. Is this what you want to put in YOUR body?
10.) Trying to guess what strain to vaccinate against each season has proved to be no more effective than a guessing game. This has been very true in recent years with the H1N1 strain. Moreover getting multi-shots will only prove more dangerous as different strains of viruses and harmful ingredients are introduced into your body.
Flu shots are indeed more dangerous than you could think, and it is best to rely on natural ways to protect against the flu rather than getting yourself vaccinated.
Isn't it interesting that the main stream public health officials never promote the various proven ways to avoid the flu other than through vaccination? How about spending some of the billions of advertising dollars teaching us natural ways to boost our immune systems and avoid the flu without harmful and sometimes deadly vaccinations.
Five Reasons Why I'll Never Get a Flu Shot
January 12, 2013
Herd Immunity: Three Reasons Why I Don't Vaccinate My Children… And Why Vaccine Supporters Shouldn't Care
The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health
Thimerosal MSDS
Paul Offit - Falsely Defends Thimerosal, (how many studies in Pubmed need exist and that they ignore, showing the mechanisms of harm, and was linking thimerosal to ASD? They deny it all)
Lets look at some of the studies, including those regarding, Thimerosal, The same Thimerosal that is in the flu vaccines that many pregnant women are getting all across the US, as they are being recommended by the CDC to receive. This typically will happen, unless they ask for a thimerosal free, single dose vial.
J Intern Med. 2011 Jan;269(1):118-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02285.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
Inflammation-related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet activation and cardiac autonomic function.
Together with an inflammatory reaction, influenza A vaccine induced platelet activation and sympathovagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance. Significant correlations were found between CRP levels and HRV parameters, suggesting a pathophysiological link between inflammation and cardiac autonomic regulation. The vaccine-related platelet activation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction may transiently increase the risk of cardiovascular events.
Studies, on the flu vaccines, lack of effectiveness
Summary of Science Demonstrating the Harmful Nature of Mercury in Vaccines
Studies on the adverse effect of thimerosal
And how can they they at the CDC, keep on recommending the flu shot for all pregnant women, that contains 25 mcg. of thimerosal, (mercury) Why do they insist on ignoring the evidence of harm?
Mercury Poisoning Is a Growing Menace
Brain Dev. 2012 May 31. [Epub ahead of print]
Prenatal exposure to organomercury, thimerosal, persistently impairs the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems in the rat brain: Implications for association with developmental disorders.
Ida-Eto M, Oyabu A, Ohkawara T, Tashiro Y, Narita N, Narita M
Source:Department of Anatomy II, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
Thimerosal, an organomercury compound, has been widely used as a preservative. Therefore, concerns have been raised about its neurotoxicity. We recently demonstrated perturbation of early serotonergic development by prenatal exposure to thimerosal (Ida-Eto et al. (2011) [11]). Here, we investigated whether prenatal thimerosal exposure causes persistent impairment after birth. Analysis on postnatal day 50 showed significant increase in hippocampal serotonin following thimerosal administration on embryonic day 9. Furthermore, not only serotonin, striatal dopamine was significantly increased. These results indicate that embryonic exposure to thimerosal produces lasting impairment of brain monoaminergic system, and thus every effort should be made to avoid the use of thimerosal.
Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Wow, great information article, but not a mention of vaccines, even though Pubmed and multiple studies on the effect, and as well in regard to glutathione. And also not a mention of the success of biomedical treatment.
Research Article
The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels
This study investigated the relationship of children's autism symptoms with their toxic metal body burden and red blood cell (RBC) glutathione levels. In children ages 3–8 years, the severity of autism was assessed using four tools: ADOS, PDD-BI, ATEC, and SAS. Toxic metal body burden was assessed by measuring urinary excretion of toxic metals, both before and after oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Multiple positive correlations were found between the severity of autism and the urinary excretion of toxic metals. Variations in the severity of autism measurements could be explained, in part, by regression analyses of urinary excretion of toxic metals before and after DMSA and the level of RBC glutathione (adjusted in all cases). This study demonstrates a significant positive association between the severity of autism and the relative body burden of toxic metals.
Oxidative Stress Causes Renal Dopamine D1 Receptor Dysfunction and Hypertension via Mechanisms That Involve Nuclear Factor-κB and Protein Kinase C
Low natural killer cell cytotoxic activity in autism: The role of glutathione, IL-2 and IL-15
Oxidative stress in autism
NYS Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities
Excerpt: Several studies have suggested alterations in the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase in autism. Additionally, altered glutathione levels and homocysteine/methionine metabolism, increased inflammation, excitotoxicity, as well as mitochondrial and immune dysfunction have been suggested in autism
Cellular and mitochondrial glutathione redox imbalance in lymphoblastoid cells derived from children with autism
Excerpt: These results suggest that the autism LCLs exhibit a reduced glutathione reserve capacity in both cytosol and mitochondria that may compromise antioxidant defense and detoxification capacity under prooxidant conditions.
Neurotoxicology. 2005 Jan;26(1):1-8.
Thimerosal neurotoxicity is associated with glutathione depletion: protection with glutathione precursors.
And thimerosal is safe to inject in a flu shot, in a pregnant woman, and then they say on no proof ever that there is any related problem in regard to ASD, and more? Really?
Folia Neuropathol. 2010;48(4):258-69.
Lasting neuropathological changes in rat brain after intermittent neonatal administration of thimerosal.
Olczak M, Duszczyk M, Mierzejewski P, Wierzba-Bobrowicz T, Majewska MD.
Department of Pharmacology and Physiology of the Nervous System, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, ul. Sobieskiego 9, Warsaw, Poland.
Thimerosal, an organomercurial added as a preservative to some vaccines, is a suspected iatrogenic factor, possibly contributing to paediatric neurodevelopmental disorders including autism. We examined the effects of early postnatal administration of thimerosal (four i.m. injections, 12 or 240 μg THIM-Hg/kg, on postnatal days 7, 9, 11 and 15) on brain pathology in Wistar rats. Numerous neuropathological changes were observed in young adult rats which were treated postnatally with thimerosal. They included: ischaemic degeneration of neurons and "dark" neurons in the prefrontal and temporal cortex, the hippocampus and the cerebellum, pathological changes of the blood vessels in the temporal cortex, diminished synaptophysin reaction in the hippocampus, atrophy of astroglia in the hippocampus and cerebellum, and positive caspase-3 reaction in Bergmann astroglia. These findings document neurotoxic effects of thimerosal, at doses equivalent to those used in infant vaccines or higher, in developing rat brain, suggesting likely involvement of this mercurial in neurodevelopmental disorders.
Vaccines and especially aluminum adjuvants cause over activation of the brains microlgia and resulting chronic brain inflammation, and has now been found in both those with ASD and ADHD, in several studies., (Those studies are found as well on this site).
Neurotoxicology. 2012 March
Microglia in the developing brain: a potential target with lifetime effects.
Harry GJ, Kraft AD.
Source:National Toxicology Program Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Microglia are a heterogenous group of monocyte-derived cells serving multiple roles within the brain, many of which are associated with immune and macrophage like properties. These cells are known to serve a critical role during brain injury and to maintain homeostasis; yet, their defined roles during development have yet to be elucidated. Microglial actions appear to influence events associated with neuronal proliferation and differentiation during development, as well as, contribute to processes associated with the removal of dying neurons or cellular debris and management of synaptic connections. These long-lived cells display changes during injury and with aging that are critical to the maintenance of the neuronal environment over the lifespan of the organism. These processes may be altered by changes in the colonization of the brain or by inflammatory events during development. This review addresses the role of microglia during brain development, both structurally and functionally, as well as the inherent vulnerability of the developing nervous system. A framework is presented considering microglia as a critical nervous system-specific cell that can influence multiple aspects of brain development (e.g., vascularization, synaptogenesis, and myelination) and have a long term impact on the functional vulnerability of the nervous system to a subsequent insult, whether environmental, physical, age-related, or disease-related.
Published by Elsevier B.V.
Evidence of Parallels Between Mercury Intoxication and the Brain Pathology in Autism
New Japanese study confirms mercury in relation to damage in brain structures associated with autism
Prenatal mercury exposure elevated risk for ADHD-related behavior
Sagiv SK. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1286.
November 1, 2012
"These results suggest that prenatal mercury exposure is associated with a higher risk of ADHD-related behaviors, and fish consumption during pregnancy is associated with a lower risk of these behaviors," Sagiv and colleagues wrote. "Although a single estimate combining these beneficial vs. detrimental effects vis-à-vis fish intake is not possible with these data, these findings are consistent with a growing literature showing risk of mercury exposure and benefits of maternal consumption of fish on fetal brain development and are important for informing dietary recommendations for pregnant women."
J Toxicol.
Published 2012 June 28
Thimerosal-Derived Ethylmercury Is a Mitochondrial Toxin in Human Astrocytes: Possible Role of Fenton Chemistry in the Oxidation and Breakage of mtDNA
Thimerosal generates ethylmercury in aqueous solution and is widely used as preservative. We have investigated the toxicology of Thimerosal in normal human astrocytes, paying particular attention to mitochondrial function and the generation of specific oxidants. We find that ethylmercury not only inhibits mitochondrial respiration leading to a drop in the steady state membrane potential, but also concurrent with these phenomena increases the formation of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and Fenton/Haber-Weiss generated hydroxyl radical. These oxidants increase the levels of cellular aldehyde/ketones. Additionally, we find a five-fold increase in the levels of oxidant damaged mitochondrial DNA bases and increases in the levels of mtDNA nicks and blunt-ended breaks. Highly damaged mitochondria are characterized by having very low membrane potentials, increased superoxide/hydrogen peroxide production, and extensively damaged mtDNA and proteins. These mitochondria appear to have undergone a permeability transition, an observation supported by the five-fold increase in Caspase-3 activity observed after Thimerosal treatment.
1. Introduction
1.1. Thimerosal and Ethylmercury
Thimerosal is a preservative that is widely used in medical products, including as a preservative in vaccines, immunoglobulin preparations, skin test antigens, antivenins, ophthalmic and nasal products, and tattoo inks, and is composed of 49.6 percent ethylmercury by weight [1]. The widespread use of Thimerosal exposes many to its potential toxic effects, especially inutero and in neonates. We report the results of a series of experiments using cultured normal human astrocytes (NHA) exposed to Thimerosal to study the compound's effect on astrocyte mitochondria.
1.2. Oxidative Stress and Brain
Read more:
"Safe, and effective"??? Not!
Eli Lilly and Thimerosal
In the 70 years since thimerosal/Merthiolate was developed, the FDA never required Eli Lilly to conduct clinical studies of its safety, despite ample evidence of its toxicity and its highly allergic properties. In fact, the FDA today still refers to the 1931 Powell and Jameison study on its Web site as indication of the "safety and effectiveness" of thimerosal as a preservative. Thimerosal/Merthiolate was widely used in over-the-counter products, including ointments, eye drops, nasal sprays and contact lens solution. In 1998, the FDA finally banned Thimerosal for use in OTC products—18 years after it began a safety review of mercury-containing products. It took another year before the CDC and the FDA would ask manufacturers to remove thimerosal from childhood vaccines. Eli Lilly stopped making Merthiolate-containing products in the mid-'80s but still profits from licensing agreements with pharmaceutical companies around the world.
Eli Lilly may be determined to avoid liability for thimerosal, but that doesn't mean it has abandoned children with neurological problems. This year, the FDA approved Straterra, a new Eli Lilly drug for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. The irony that Eli Lilly profits from damaged children is not lost on parent Robert Krakow: "When Eli Lilly is promoting Straterra on TV, saying up to 10 percent of children can be helped, you realize what we are up against."
VRM: Special Report
Those doctors who endorse the continued use of Thimerosal in vaccines, including the authors of the recent American Academy of Pediatrics article here-in (Walter A. Orenstein, MD, Jerome A. Paulson, MD, FAAP, Michael T. Brady, MD, FAAP, Louis Z. Cooper, MD, Katherine Seib, MSPH), should have their licences revoked immediately. But it's also time for conscientious parents to consider walking away, once & for all, from the ENTIRE institution of Western Allopathic Medicine; all the trappings of this Medical Mafia monopoly. You have the evidence in hand.
Still think that thimerosal containing flu vaccine is a good thing for a pregnant woman? How recklessly irresponsible is the CDC, anyway? Are and were they scared that the ASD numbers will go down, after the said removal of thimerosal? So now they nail the fetus before it is ever born? That is a rational and legitimate question, they should answer to. Denial of all, and nothing would be enough. If they admitted their liability, then what; think about that.
Published on Thursday, June 16, 2005
Deadly Immunity, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
When a study revealed that mercury in childhood vaccines may have caused autism in thousands of kids, the government rushed to conceal the data -- and to prevent parents from suing drug companies for their role in the epidemic.
Crimes at the CDC
According to Kennedy, in a July 1999 letter, vaccine producer SmithKline Beecham tells CDC that it is ready to produce non-Thimerosal DTP (Diptheria/Tetanus/Pertussis) vaccines immediately and has sufficient inventories to supply the entire U.S. market during the remainder of 1999 and the first half of 2000, by which time other vaccine manufacturers would have their Thimerosal-free DTP vaccines on line. Thimerosal-laden DTP vaccines containing 25 micrograms of mercury apiece (75 thousand trillion atoms of mercury) were then being administered to American infants at two months, four months and six months — far exceeding EPA's recommended safe level for mercury. Had CDC accepted SmithKline's offer, it could have immediately reduced the mercury exposures to vaccinated six-month-old children by 40%.
Kennedy continued, "However, in November, CDC mysteriously sent a letter back rejecting SmithKline's offer. Then, on July 14, 2000 CDC published a deceptive press release promising to require that all vaccines be Thimerosal-free as soon as "adequate supplies are available." This was a full 12 months after the agency had denied SmithKline's proposal."
CDC has allowed an entire generation of children to be injured.
"If CDC were basing its decision on safety alone, it would have taken SmithKline up on its offer. That's a no-brainer," said a federal health official to Kennedy anonymously. "So there were other considerations beside safety that were guiding their decision making." "Among these "other considerations" were CDC's important concerns for the preservation of the vaccine program, a bureaucratic impulse for self-preservation, and protecting the economic interests of its vaccine industry friends."Immediate withdrawal would send a strong message; 'We messed up!'" the health official told Kennedy. "And I don't think they wanted to send that message to parents, the public or those considering legal action." "There was also concern," says the federal official, "that an immediate withdrawal might discredit the international vaccine programs for which CDC is an important partner."
Why will CDC inject millions of minority kids in America's poorest neighborhoods with poison proven to kill brain tissue and cause learning disorders when child-safe vaccines are available?
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Say No to Thimerosal, Say No to the Flu Vaccine
Posted by Dr Sircus on January 11, 2013
Unreal!!!!!!!!!!!!! Isn't the pharma/CDC physiological health science, great? Where is it?
They have all the science they say, don't they. Wow.
Article excerpt:
In this crazy world of ours, medicine has turned against the people's wellbeing, meaning they have committed high treason against the sacred medical oath to do no harm to their patients. A flu vaccine with mercury-based thimerosal used as a preservative is an insult to the public's intelligence but unfortunately that intelligence has been buried under a thick wall of medical lies and propaganda meant to sell vaccines.
"Chronic mercury exposure is also a threat to our health and makes us especially vulnerable to flu infections. It has been shown that "prolonged exposure of mammals (white mice) to low mercury concentrations (0.008-0.02mg/m3) leads to a significant increase in the susceptibility of mice to pathological influenza virus strains. This is shown by a more severe course of infection. In the experimental group more mice died (86-90.3%) than in the unexposed animals (60.2-68%), additionally the experimental group died more quickly. The significant difference was in the appearance and degree of pneumonia in the effected animals," wrote Dr. I. M. Trakhtenberg in "Chronic Effects of Mercury on Organisms."
The CDC recommends that everyone over six months of age get a flu shot, especially people in high-risk groups, such as those under five or over 65 and people with chronic medical conditions, such as asthma or heart disease.
Any competent biochemist would look at the structure of thimerosal and identify it as a potent enzyme inhibitor. What is surprising is that the appropriate animal and laboratory testing was not done on the vaccines containing thimerosal (and aluminum) before the government embarked on a mandated vaccine program that exposed infants to the levels of thimerosal that occurred.
- Dr. Boyd E. Haley
Read more:
Vaccine Damages Are No One's Illusion
Posted by Dr Sircus on October 12, 2010
The Shocking Lack of Evidence Supporting Flu Vaccines
December 29th 2011
Health Guides Vaccine Research
Greenmedinfo.com provides the public with an alternative medical and toxicological resource for ascertaining the true risks and/or unintended consequences of conventional medical interventions such as vaccinations.
The research below represents under-reported, minimized and otherwise overlooked peer-reviewed data on adverse effects associated with vaccination.
Read more:
What's coming through that needle? Dr Sherri Tenpenny
What Is Coming Through That Needle? The Problem of Pathogenic Vaccine Contamination
Benjamin McRearden
Medical evidence shows that pregnant mothers exposed to mercury in vaccines are more likely to have children with ADHD
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038037_pregnancy_vaccines_ADHD.html
Multiple studies link autism to mercury, which is still present in most flu vaccines
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031678_mercury_autism.html
Exposed: CDC deliberately manipulated, covered up scientific data showing link between vaccines containing mercury and autism
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034038_vaccines_autism.html
Government report links thimerosal laden vaccines to neurological disorders
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036748_thimerosal_vaccines_neurological_disorders.html
If everyone is getting the flu vaccine and it works, why is there such a need for Tamiflu?
Sounds like the Tamiflu side effects can be more dangerous and worse than the flu itself? Take a look.
Tamiflu Side Effects.
Generic name: oseltamivir.
Why You Should Avoid Tamiflu
By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Tamiflu in Rivers Could Breed Drug-Resistant Flu Strains
(More on Tamiflu hazards, further down on this page).
This girl recently died due to influenza, and she had received the flu shot. Why is that not in published the major media?
A 5th person has died from flu complications in Minnesota. The latest, 14-year-old Carly Christensen from St. Louis Park. And we've learned Carly did receive a flu vaccination...
The Flu Vaccine–What Your Doctor Won't Tell You (Or Probably Doesn't Even Know)
Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?
Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD
Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090519172045.htm
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):e23-7.
Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: a case-control study.
Excerpt: Using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for asthma status stratification, there was a significant association between hospitalization in asthmatic subjects and TIV (p = 0.001). TIV did not provide any protection against hospitalization in pediatric subjects, especially children with asthma. On the contrary, we found a threefold increased risk of hospitalization in subjects who did get the TIV vaccine. This may be a reflection not only of vaccine effectiveness but also the population of children who are more likely to get the vaccine.
Again, examine the evidence!!!
No Value in Any Influenza Vaccine: Cochrane Collaboration Study
The Truth About The Flu Shot, by Dr Sherri Tenpenny
The Truth About the Flu Shots in Pregnancy, by Dr Sherri tenpenny
Flu Shots For The Elderly Are Ineffective
Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told) http://www.naturalnews.com/033998_influenza_vaccines_effectiveness.html
Flu vaccines judged ineffective
Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine
Flu Vaccines, pharma fraud, quack science, the CDC and WHO -- all exposed by Richard Gale and Gary Null
Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines
The entire vaccine industry is being exposed for unproven assumptions and misrepresentations of data
Pregnancy, Flu Shots and Autism
Cited is Seneff S., Davidson R.M., Liu J. Empirical Data Confirm Autism Symptoms Related to Aluminum and Acetaminophen Exposure. Entropy. 2012; 14(11):2227-2253.
Download PDF Full-Text http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/11/2227/pdf
Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?
Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD
Virol J. 2008 Feb 25;5:29. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-5-29.
Again, vitamin D and C; a better option.
About Vitamin D
How To Get Your Vitamin D
Vitamin D supplementation
Vitamin D Council recommended amounts
Based on the body's indicated daily vitamin D usage, Vitamin D Council recommends the following amounts of supplemental vitamin D3 per day in the absence of proper sun exposure. Due to the variable response discussed above, these are only estimated amounts.
Healthy children under the age of 1 years – 1,000 IU.
Healthy children over the age of 1 years – 1,000 IU per every 25 lbs of body weight.
Healthy adults and adolescents – at least 5,000 IU.
Pregnant and lactating mothers - at least 6,000 IU.
Bionaid (antiviral)
Thieves Oil Provides Powerful Protection against Viruses and Bacteria
Home made Thieves oil
New Mandate for Healthcare Workers — Get Vaccinated or Lose Your Job
Health Essentials
The 5 Essentials are the core foundation of Maximized Living.
FLU PREVENTION PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE CHIROPRACTIC CARE, (with 110 research references)
Chiropractic and the Immune System
VIDS – Vaccine Induced Diseases
Five Reasons Why I'll Never Get a Flu Shot
January 12, 2013
If you're looking for a deeply scientific treatise on the flu shot, this isn't it.
I'm not a chemist, a physician or someone with an advanced degree in biology. I'm just a mom with an internet connection. I'm a person who has researched and compiled an assortment of worrisome facts that point in one direction: the flu shot is NOT beneficial.
Some of these reasons are backed up by science, and others are an acceptance of that little voice of reason whispering "Something just isn't right about this." As a reader, you are welcome to take my personal instinct with a grain of salt. I strongly encourage you to do your own independent research and come to your own conclusions. Look for sources that are not linked to the dollars being earned from these flu shots – no Big Pharma funded studies, no CDC, no FDA. Check out the funding for the studies that you cite and then judge the findings accordingly.
First of all, it just doesn't work.
The propaganda machine will tell you that the flu shot is "60% effective", but this is a blatant manipulation of the statistics. This article published last year at Natural News explains how the numbers are "massaged" to present the picture that Big Pharma (who funds the research) wants presented. In actuality, the flu shot prevents the flu in only 1.5 out of 100 adults. You can wade through the abstract at The Lancet here.
1.5%. Let that sink in. That means that you have a 98.5% chance it WON'T work. Why would anyone possibly have something foreign injected into his or her body with those odds?
Part of the reason it is ineffective it because it's guesswork. Scientists must attempt to predict which 3 viruses (of the over-300 influenza viruses that have been identified) will be the most prevalent during a given year. If you get the flu shot and are then exposed to virus #4-300, you will have no additional immunity to those.
Natural News just published an article yesterday that tells us many of the people being struck down in the current epidemic have received vaccinations, which clearly did not have the desired effect.
Secondly, there are horrible things in the flu shot.
The flu shot contains some incredibly nasty stuff. Obviously it contains the virus itself, either "dead" or "attenuated" (weakened). But it also contains a host of other harmful toxins. The inclusion of these toxins is not speculation. Following is a little primer giving some information on the toxic ingredients that you can find in the CDC's ingredients lists. Take the time to cross-match these toxins to the vaccine that is given in your area. You have the right to request the ingredients insert before you take the vaccine or subject your child to it.
2-Phenoxyethanol is an anti-bacterial agent being used as a replacement for the preservative Thimerosal (mercury). It's considered a very toxic material that could cause a boatload of side effects, including behavioral disorders … vomiting … diarrhea … visual disturbances … convulsions … rapid heart rate … central nervous system disorders … depression … kidney, liver and blood disorders … and reproductive defects.
Aluminum shows up in vaccines in many forms – like aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxy phosphate sulfate and aluminum hydroxide, to name a few. It works as an "adjuvant" to stimulate your immune system's response to the virus in the vaccine. The problem is … aluminum is a particularly dangerous neurotoxin. It has the ability to slip past your body's natural defenses and enter your brain – potentially causing brain damage … Alzheimer's disease … dementia … convulsions … and coma. Human and animal studies have shown that aluminum can even cause nerve death.
Ammonium Sulfate is a substance commonly added to pesticides. It's not known at this time if it's cancer-causing, but it has been suspected of gastrointestinal, liver, nervous system and respiratory system toxicity.
Beta-Propiolactone ranks high as a hazardous chemical on at least five federal regulatory lists. It caused lymphomas and hepatomas after being injected into lab mice, but its true effect on humans is not known. Due to animal study results, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified beta-propiolactone as a possible human carcinogen.
Formaldehyde is used as a preservative to stabilize the vaccine. It's a colorless, flammable, strong-smelling chemical that's mostly used in industry to manufacture building materials and produce many household products. Plus, it's also used to embalm – and preserve – dead bodies. (Remember the frog in your high school biology lab?) Formaldehyde is suspected of weakening the immune system and causing neurological system damage … genetic damage … metabolic acidosis (excessive blood acidity) … circulatory shock … respiratory insufficiency … and acute renal (kidney) failure. It's been classified as a known human carcinogen (cancer-causing substance) by IARC and is ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds on at least eight federal regulatory lists.
Formalin helps preserve the vaccine. It's a mixture of formaldehyde, methanol and water. It's mostly used to preserve tissue samples in health care laboratories and presents the same danger to your health as formaldehyde does.
Gentamicin Sulfate is an antibiotic that 's been known to cause deafness or loss of equilibrioception (sense of balance). It can also be highly nephrotoxic (damage your kidneys) if multiple doses accumulate over time.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) excites and poisons your cells and tissues. It's used as a stabilizer in vaccines and is also found in many processed foods. MSG has been shown to cause retinal degeneration … behavior disorders … learning disabilities … reproductive disorders … obesity … and even lesions on the brains of lab animals. Allergic reactions to MSG can be severe.
MRC-5 Cellular Protein is human diploid cells taken from aborted human fetuses. They're used as a culture to grow the virus.
Neomycin is an antibiotic that has been shown to have multiple effects on your body. It can be a neurotoxin and an ototoxin (affect hearing and balance). It also can cause respiratory paralysis, kidney damage and kidney failure. Plus, it retards your vitamin B6 absorption, sometimes leading to mental retardation and epilepsy. Some allergic reactions to neomycin can be life threatening.
Octoxinol-9 is a vaginal spermicide.
Phenol is included in vaccines to help stimulate immune response. Instead, it does the opposite – by inhibiting phagocytic activity. Phagocytes are your body's first line of defense. They engulf and digest antigens and activate the other elements of your immune system. Phenol's phagocytic-inhibiting effect actually hinders your immune system from properly dealing with the pathogens that are entering your body through the vaccine.
Phenol is used in the production of drugs, weed killers and synthetic resins, so you can imagine the effect it has on the human body. It's considered to be toxic to your cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, reproductive and respiratory systems … your liver … your kidneys … and your skin. Phenol is so deadly that is was used by the Nazis as a means of extermination during the World War II. Phenol injections were given to thousands of people in concentration camps – especially at Auschwitz-Birkenau – to kill those who were mentally ill, had incurable tuberculosis and were permanently incapable of work.
Polymyxin B is an antibiotic with some nasty side effects – neurotoxicity and acute renal tubular necrosis (the most common cause of kidney failure).
Polysorbate 80 (Tween-80) works as a stabilizer in the vaccine. It's used in a wide variety of products including ice cream, milk products, vitamin tablets, lotions and creams and medical products like vaccines and anti-cancer medications. But it's not as safe as it sounds. According to the December 2005 issue of Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, polysorbate 80 can affect your immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock, which can kill. It also causes cancer in animals.
Streptomycin is an antibiotic. Its main side effect is ototoxicity – the loss of hearing.
Thimerosal is used as a preservative in the vaccine. It contains 49.6% mercury by weight and has been implicated in many health conditions, such as cardiovascular disease … autism … seizures … mental retardation … hyperactivity … dyslexia … and many more nervous system conditions. The mercury used in vaccines is second in toxicity only to the radioactive substance, Uranium. It's a powerful neurotoxin that can damage the entire nervous system of an infant in no time.
Plus, the inclusion of aluminum and even formaldehyde with the mercury in the vaccine magnifies the problem. Aluminum can make the mercury 100 times more toxic. Toss in formaldehyde as well, and one independent study found that mercury toxicity was increased by 1,000 times.
There is a risk of terrible side effects.
I'd honestly rather take my chances with the flu than to have myself injected with something that carries the risk of such side effects on the off-chance (the 1.5% off-chance) that I might avoid catching the 1% of viruses that the shot "protects" me from.
The CDC itself warns:
Mild Problems
soreness, redness, or swelling where the shot was given
hoarseness; sore, red or itchy eyes; cough
If these problems occur, they usually begin soon after the shot and last 1-2 days.
Moderate Problems
Young children who get inactivated flu vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) at the same time appear to be at increased risk for seizures caused by fever. Ask your doctor for more information.
Tell your doctor if a child who is getting flu vaccine has ever had a seizure.
Severe Problems
Life-threatening allergic reactions from vaccines are very rare. If they do occur, it is usually within a few minutes to a few hours after the shot.
In 1976, a type of inactivated influenza (swine flu) vaccine was associated with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). Since then, flu vaccines have not been clearly linked to GBS. However, if there is a risk of GBS from current flu vaccines, it would be no more than 1 or 2 cases per million people vaccinated. This is much lower than the risk of severe influenza, which can be prevented by vaccination.
But what they don't tell you is that not all adverse reactions are reported and that when they are, the statistics are doctored to keep the do-good reputation of the shot untarnished.
In searching the year 2011 on the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website - (http://vaers.hhs.gov/index) – it was found that 51 deaths were caused by the flu vaccines, along with 232 life threatening events, 116 permanent disabilities, 739 hospitalizations, 109 prolonged hospitalizations, 4,039 ER visits, and 6,221 "not serious" reports. According to the National Vaccine Information Center, fewer than one percent of all adverse vaccine reactions are ever reported
Also, consider cases like that of Desiree Jennings, the Washington Redskins cheerleader who suffered a paralyzing nerve disorder after receiving her seasonal flu shot. Not only did the industry refuse to compensate her for her trauma and enormous medical bills, vicious attempts were made to publically discredit her.
Jennings was a fit and healthy cheerleader up until August when she got a seasonal flu shot. Ten days after the shot she began experiencing flu like symptoms, followed by severe convulsions and black outs. After seeing around 60 doctors, Jennings was eventually diagnosed with dystonia, a paralyzing neurological disorder that causes the muscles to relentlessly contract and spasm, causing extreme difficulties with walking, talking and general body movements.
Despite the fact that doctors who vigorously examined her condition at both Fairfax Inova and Johns Hopkins confirmed that she was suffering from dystonia, and that the cause of the illness was her reaction to the flu shot, numerous apologists for big pharma have ludicrously claimed that her story is a hoax and that her disease is imaginary, citing no evidence whatsoever and having had no contact with Jennings at all.
Next, I do not trust the FDA.
FDA approval means less than nothing to me. If the FDA approves it, it just means that the company behind it has enough money and clout to get it approved. I do not trust the FDA to look out for the best interests of me, my children, or anyone else's children, for that matter. I wrote an article last year regarding the FDA and here are some of the observations that really show the agenda of the agency:
The FDA wants to be in control of ALL things ingested by the American people. The FDA is simply an enforcing tentacle of the big business organized crime syndicate that actually runs the United States, and is thus complicit in the plans of the New World Order.
The FDA can overlook the horrible side effects and suicides caused by anti-depressant pharmaceuticals while attempting to ban the sale of St. John's Wort, a remedy that has been used successfully for hundreds of years.
The FDA can bypass the deadly e-coli outbreaks occurring in massive factory farms where the animals are squeezed in so compactly that they can't turn around, but they want to prosecute an organic farmer for using manure as compost.
The FDA can cheerfully tell the American people, "Don't worry, there's nothing to see here" with regard to the ever-rising radiation levels in milk but they want to raid the dairies of an Amish man who sells milk right from the cow, as it has been consumed for centuries.
The FDA wholeheartedly supports genetic modification of our crops and livestock. The FDA endorses additives and preservatives. The FDA promotes chemical pharmaceuticals over gentle natural remedies.
MSM's Constant Endorsement
And finally, when the media pushes it, I automatically decline. Seriously – anytime there is a big hype or something is made to be mandatory, my gut tells me "This isn't good." Look at all of the commercials for anti-depressants. Look at all the soothing newscasters telling us how "we don't have to suffer." Look at how GMOs are being promoted as the answer to world hunger. Real journalism is all but dead and can only be found in alternative media sources. The mainstream media is Public Enemy #1, a group of corporate whores who put on make-up and a pretty outfit in order to seduce the public into believing what the puppet masters want them to believe. The media is owned by the same tie-wearing serial killers who own Big Pharma, government agencies and the financial industry.
It may sound illogical but I firmly believe the MSM is complicit in the overthrow of personal sovereignty. Therefore, if something is heartily endorsed by them I am immediately suspicious. I refuse to be submissively led along by the folks on the tube. When they repeat something over and over, at the very least it requires close and careful investigation, if not all-out rejection of what they are saying. There is nearly ALWAYS an agenda and that agenda is nearly always one that crushes liberty or health in the name of power or money.
Any mainstream article on the flu that you read states some form of the following: "The best way to prevent the flu is to get a flu shot." It is a not-so-subtle brainwashing. It hearkens back to the theories of Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play."
"The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."
This programming has allowed many organizations to make the flu shot a term of participation, with little outcry from the public. Workplaces, schools and other activities across the US and Canada have instituted policies that force all participants to receive a flu shot. Longterm hospital employees have been fired for refusing to have the toxin injected into themselves. Children have been banned from pre-schools and daycares in 6 states. In brighter news, widespread refusal of healthcare workers in British Columbia has resulted in the province dropping the policy for the remainder of the year.
I don't believe that all health care professionals and flu-shot advocates have ill-intent. I think that many of them have just sipped the mainstream media Kool-aid – the tale-spinners of Big Pharma have slipped in just enough truth to make their theories believable. Many people are deep-down decent and have difficulty believing that such a perverse money/power agenda could exist.
Mandatory policies of this nature always trigger a suspicious response from me. They whisper the ominous words "soft-kill eugenics" to me. No, I don't have proof of this, but I'd rather err on the side of longevity. I'll take the risk of illness that my healthy immune system can fight off over the risk of being forcibly inoculated with whatever toxins the creators of these vaccines choose to include. I'll use my little arsenal of home remedies and come through it without the risk of long-term side effects that have yet to be discovered (or at least, have yet to be made public).
What do you think about the flu shot?
Did you take the vaccine? Why or why not? Please feel free to share links to any interesting sources or studies on this topic.
Eugenics, isn't real??? No chance, right; deliberately, nor by careless ignorance? Take a look. Polysorbate 80, and all the chemical crude and high amounts of aluminum adjuvant in the Gardasil vaccine; polysorbate 80 when injected, is known to produce sterility in rats by the way, at higher amounts of course; but just the same why was it allowed to be in that vaccine, known the potential risks? But guess what, Polysorbate 80 when injected, is as well in some of the flu vaccine formulations.
Flu Shot ingredients
Vaccine Ingredients
Flu Vaccine Ingredients. (Alternative source as novaccine has been at times, down).
'Preservative-free' vaccines and flu shots still contain deadly toxins
2004 UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds
Gardasil Ingredient caused sterility in lab rats
Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90.
Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats.
Gajdová M, Jakubovsky J, Války J.
Source: Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Limbová, Bratislava.
Neonatal female rats were injected ip (0.1 ml/rat) with Tween 80 in 1, 5 or 10% aqueous solution on days 4-7 after birth. Treatment with Tween 80 accelerated maturation, prolonged the oestrus cycle, and induced persistent vaginal oestrus. The relative weight of the uterus and ovaries was decreased relative to the untreated controls. Squamous cell metaplasia of the epithelial lining of the uterus and cytological changes in the uterus were indicative of chronic oestrogenic stimulation. Ovaries were without corpora lutea, and had degenerative follicles.
Polysorbate 80 In Swine Flu Vaccines = Infertility In Humans
What is In the Flu Vaccine that Can Cause Infertility?
The damning study against polysorbate 80 that Organic Health refers to above was a Slovakian study published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology in 1993. The researchers injected female rats with Tween 80 (in 1, 5 or 10 percent aqueous solution), on days four through seven after birth.
They discovered that Tween80 accelerated the rats' maturation, prolonged the estrous cycle, decreased the weight of the uterus and ovaries, and caused damage to the lining of the uterus indicative of chronic estrogenic stimulation.
The rats' ovaries were also damaged, with degenerative follicles and no corpora lutea (a mass of progesterone-secreting endocrine tissue that forms immediately after ovulation).
Such severe deformities to the ovary can lead to infertility.
The question is whether or not these effects also apply to humans. Unfortunately, there's a glaring lack of continued research in this area.
Instead of thoroughly evaluating the dangers of the ingredients used in vaccines, it appears as though vaccine makers are taking full advantage of their government sanctioned immunity against liability for damage.
This Detergent In Almost Every Flu Vaccine Affects The Blood Brain Barrier And Can Cause Seizures
Vaccine Ingredients: Non-Ionic Surfactants (Tween 80, Triton X-100, Nonoxynol-9)
Biomaterials. 2004 Jul;25(15):3065-71.
Specific role of polysorbate 80 coating on the targeting of nanoparticles to the brain.
Sleight of Handling: More Merck Magic Tricks With HPV Vaccine
What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?
You can read this almost unbelievable document here:
The Radical Population Control And Eugenics Agenda Of The Global Elite
Gardasil Vaccine Ingredients - Roach Killer, Aluminum, and Polysorbate 80
Many vaccines contain polysorbate 80 which can cause anaphylactic shock
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Dec;95(6):593-9.
Polysorbate 80 in medical products and nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions
Polysorbate 80 in Vaccines - A Potentially Toxic Vaccine Stabilizer
Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination
Also go to the Tamilfu Hoax, site page.
Tamiflu for Children
Tamiflu is an FDA-approved prescription flu medicine indicated for children 1 year and older.
In fact, Tamiflu has been clinically proven to help children get better up to 26% (1.5 days) faster when taken within 48 hours of their first symptoms.8
Tamiflu attacks the flu virus itself, not just the symptoms, helping to limit the flu's ability to spread in the body. This may help keep flu symptoms from getting worse.1
Tamiflu must be prescribed by a doctor, so if your child has sudden fever, aches, chills, or extreme fatigue, call your doctor right away.1
Proven, really? 26%, really?
Now, the real truth.
And here is what the chemical pharma medical establishment would want you to use, and after your toxic flu vaccine failed.
Tamiflu anti-viral drug revealed as complete hoax; Roche studies based on scientific fraud
Tamiflu Drug Causes Nightmares in One in Five Children
Tamiflu news, articles and information:
Don't give Tamiflu or Relenza to under-12s, warn researchers
'Tamiflu turned my children into hallucinating, sobbing wrecks'
Tamiflu 'should not be given to children'
UK scientists urge government to rethink its strategy of giving swine flu anti-virals to some children
Study: Tamiflu may do children more harm than good
Study: Tamiflu causes nausea and nightmares in children
Side effects and effectiveness of 'wonder-drug' Tamiflu under the microscope as Department of Health faces awkward questions over mass prescriptions
Health officials are to face questions about whether they prescribed Tamiflu on a mass scale too quickly in the wake of the 2009 swine flu outbreak.
A two-year review into the widely prescribed drug will reveal findings about the effectiveness and side-effects of the swine flu 'wonder-drug'.
The conclusions made by the Cochrane Collaboration could pose uncomfortable questions for the Department of Health as to whether they rushed into mass prescriptions of Tamiflu when swine flu hit the nation in 2009.
Flu Drug Tamiflu Proven Ineffective and Dangerous
Children should not be given Tamiflu, Oxford researchers say
Children should not be given the antiviral drug Tamiflu for swine flu because its harms outweigh any benefits and the Government should review its policy on dealing with the pandemic, researchers have said.
Monday, January 28, 2013
I'm tired of Scare Tactics. 5 Myths You Need to Know About the Flu Vaccine
The point is I've come to these conclusions from my own knowledge, intuition, and critical thinking. And I suggest you do the same.
I've had enough of the bullying and lying.
Want to know the facts? Here's a short list of common myths (*cough* purposeful lies).
By all means don't take my word for it. I encourage you to find out for yourself if this "flu epidemic" is a real thing, or if you are being duped.
1. The Flu vaccine is 60% Effective
According to an article published in The Lancet earlier in 2012, the vaccine prevents influenza in approximately 60 of every 100 people.
Most people would think that if something is 60% effective then that means if 100 people are given the vaccine, 60 of them would be protected. However the truth is far less optimistic.
The study compared 18,797 subjects who got the flu vaccine to 13,095 subjects who didn't. The 221 of the 18,797 (1.2%) subjects who got the flu shot developed the flu, and 357 of the 13,095 (2.7%) not to receive a flu shot got the flu. That's the raw data. (source)
Of the 13,000+ adults included in the study, less than 3% of those who didn't get the flu shot came down with the flu. That means 97 percent of the non-vaccinated did NOT get the flu.
So the truth is, the chance of you getting the flu is only 1.5% higher if you are NOT vaccinated.
Foot note:
Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told)
2. The Flu Vaccine is an Epidemic
Epidemic- "affecting or tending to affect a disproportionately large number of individuals within a population, community, or region at the same time."
Remember the H1N1 scare that had people getting vaccinated in droves? Well out of the 307 million people in the US (at that time), the CDC estimated "that between about 2,500 and 6,000 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April and October 17, 2009."
Now I'm not an English professor, but "epidemic" does not seem to quite describe the amount of lives lost.
Sounds like another scare tactic to me.
3. The Flu Vaccine Protects Against Most Flu Viruses
There is not one type of flu virus. There are actually 3 (A, B, & C) which then mutate into varying strains. Which is why one vaccine can't be created to protect you against the flu.
According to WebMD:
Type A and B viruses are responsible for the large flu epidemics. Type C flu virus is more stable and usually causes milder respiratory symptoms. While the flu vaccine can help protect you from type A and B flu viruses, there is no immunization or flu shot for type C virus.
Yup. Vaccine's can't protect you from 1/3 of the flu viruses out there. Plus viruses change over time. So the piece that is in the vaccine might not "look" them same when the real thing actually shows up. If vaccinated, your body prepares for one thing, but gets another.
So how do scientists determine which strain to include in the vaccine each year?
"[The CDC] only choose three to five strains of influenza A out of 250-plus strains, and they take only two or three influenza B strains out of 75-100 that are out there at any one time. If they don't guess the right one, you're going to get sick. You're putting your faith in the CDC's ability to guess the one that might be a pandemic." (source)
They basically guess.
OK, I'm exaggerating, they do a lot of research I'm sure. But the fact remains, they simply don't know which strain will be more prevalent each year.
4. The Flu Vaccine is Safe for Pregnant Women (and their unborn children)
If you've been pregnant you know that there is a long list of things Dr.'s recommend you shouldn't have. Aspirin, wine, caffeine, antibiotics and herbs are among them.
But it's totally OK to inject into your body (and fetus) the following ingredients detailed by the CDC:
Formaldehyde (a known carcinogen),
Thimerosal (mercury),
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) (a neurotoxin),
oh and.......Antibiotics.
Doesn't that seem a bit hypocritical?
Yet a peer reviewed study in Human & Experimental Toxicology determined that there were 590 fetal losses per million from the flu vaccine during the 2009-2010 flu season. That's 183,490 fetuses dead because of a "safe" vaccine their pregnant mother received. As opposed to the 3-49,000 that actually die from the contracting the flu.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather take the possible risk of the flu (which we already know is slight) than expose my helpless unborn child to possible death.
Foot note:
More pharmaceutical denial, failure to take any responsibility, and sham and quackery scam.
From the insert:
• Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pregnant women
or nursing mothers. (8.1, 8.3)
• Register women who receive FLUARIX while pregnant in the pregnancy
registry by calling 1-888-452-9622. (8.1)"
Flu Shot Not Tested on Pregnant Women – Newborn Babies Monitored for Birth Defects by Drug Company
5. The Flu Vaccine Doesn't Make You Sick (updated typo)
Tell that to Piers Morgan, whose recent PR stunt to prove the flu vaccine is safe (by getting injected on Dr. Oz's show), has been overshadowed by the fact that days later....he got sick with the flu.
You have to laugh at that kind of irony.
True, this is totally anecdotal, but how many of you know someone who doesn't get vaccinated because they had an adverse effect in the past?
I know quite a few.
Aside from symptoms of influenza, it's also widely reported that side effects also include: soreness at the site of the injection, muscle aching, fever, and feeling unwell.
Hmm...sounds kind of like the flu. Weird.
Take your health, and the health of your family into your own hands. Eat a well balanced diet, wash your hands, get sunshine and exercise. Don't let anyone scare you into the flu vaccine.
Living Proof Vitamin C Miracle Cure 60 Minutes Video 3 News (the above video)
How in can any doctor call themselves a medical professional and a health care provider, when they refuse to allow something as simple as IV vitamin C, simply because it does not fit with the statements of pharma and the FDA.."ONLY a (chemical) drug can cure or prevent disease. The revolving door with the pharmaceutical industry FDA. Pharmaceuticals do not get to the root cause of viral illness, nor most any other illness, with the exception of antibiotics which only work on bacterial related illness. Vitamin C is both somewhat antibacterial and and significantly effective as an antiviral. But keep on pushing those toxic and often contaminated flu shots, and dangerous and ineffective Tamiflu, with all its nasty side effects..
High Dose Vitamin C Cures Swine Flu And Gets Suppressed! Dr. Thomas Levy (the above video)
Vitamin C mega-dosing continues to unleash healing miracles around the world
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, December 3, 2009
Vitamin C As An Antiviral: It's All About Dose
The Origin of the 42-Year Stonewall of Vitamin C, (Now over 60 years) Robert Landwehr
An historical compendium of 20th-Century medical & scientific literature attesting to the efficacy of Ascorbate (Ascorbic Acid, Cevitamic Acid, Sodium Ascorbate etc. a.k.a. "Vitamin C")in the treatment and prevention of human and animal illnesses and diseases.
Ascorbate / Vitamin C Historic References
LIPOSOMAL ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C - Homemade As Effective As IV - DIY for Pennies
How to Make Liposomal Vitamin C At Home
LivOn Laboratories - High Dose Lypo-Spheric Vitamin C
Lypo-SphericTM Vitamin C
Thomas Levy
Thomas Levy Talks To Vitamin C Can Cure Coalition (full presentation)
Vitamin C and Law Levy presentation slides LINK
NZ News 3
(Kindle edition of this excellent book @ $3.03)
Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins: Curing the Incurable
Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins:Curing the Incurable
Journal of Applied Nutrition Vol. 23, No's 3 & 4, Winter 1971
Observations On the Dose and Administration of Ascorbic Acid When Employed Beyond the Range Of A Vitamin In Human Pathology Frederick R. Klenner, M.D., F.C.C.P.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, March 15, 2006
High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C: A Tribute to Fred Klenner
Vitamin C Cures by Dr. Fred Klenner
HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: The Pioneering Work of FREDERICK ROBERT KLENNER, M.D.
Frederick R. Klenner, M.D., F.C.C.P
Vitamin C - Nutritional Medicine
Doctors and Healers using or promoting Diet & Nutrients
Fredrick Klenner
Dr Archie Kalokerinos MBBS PhD FAPM. (Another well known vitaminC doctor)
Vitamin C for Whooping Cough. Updated Edition. Suzanne Humphries, MD
Why is nobody studying vitamin C in whooping cough? – Conventional medicine's hypocrisy. by Suzanne Humphries, MD
ICIM's 56th Congress: Yin/Yang; The Marriage Between Conventional and Innovative Medicine
Knowledge of Today: Crossroads: Labor Pains of a New Worldview (Documentary)