text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Aug 23, 1994
|Filing date
|Jun 13, 1989
|Priority date
|May 22, 1985
|Fee status
|Publication number
|Paul J. Mihalko, Robert M. Abra, Ramachandran Radhakrishnan
|Original Assignee
|Liposome Technology, Inc.
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (13), Referenced by (35), Classifications (21), Legal Events (3)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application for "Liposome/Bronchodilator Method and System", Ser. No. 07/022,669 filed Mar. 6, 1987, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application for "Liposome Inhalation Method and System," Ser. No. 737,221, filed May 22, 1985 and now abandoned; "Liposome Concentrate and Method", U.S. Ser. No. 860,528, filed May 7, 1986 and now abandoned; and "Liposome Inhalation Method and System", U.S. Ser. No. 937,607, filed Dec. 3, 1986 and now abandoned.
The present invention relates to drug delivery by inhalation, and, in particular, to an improved delivery system and method for treating bronchial constriction by a liposome-entrapped β2 -agonist.
The following references are incorporated herein by corresponding number:
1. Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, (Gannaro, A. R., Ed.), 17th edition, Mack Publishing Company (1985).
2. Szoka, F., Jr., et al, Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng (1980), 9: 467.
3. Szoka, F., Jr., et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) (1978) 75: 4194.
4. Hollenbeck, R. G., et al, in "Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice" (Banker, G. S., et al, eds), J. P. Lippincott, Philadelphia (1982), pp. 382-391.
5. Amdur, M. D., et al, Am J Phys Soc 912: 364 (1958).
6. Pawlak, et al, Acta Polon Pharm 27(5): 453 (1970).
Inhalation provides an effective means for treating a variety of bronchial constriction diseases, such as bronchial asthma, emphysema, bronchitis, and bronchiectasis. An obvious advantage of inhalation in treating bronchial constriction is the ability to deliver the drug directly to the site of drug action. A related advantage is the rapid onset of the therapeutic effect, compared with other routes of administration, such as intramuscular and oral routes. For drugs which are susceptible to breakdown in the gastrointestinal tract, or which otherwise cannot be administered orally, inhalation may be preferred for a variety of reasons over intravenous or intramuscular injection.
Bronchial constriction conditions or diseases are treated with a bronchodilator drug, such as albuterol, epinephrine, isoetharine, isoproteranol, metaproteranol, terbutaline, and salbutamol, which have strong or moderate β2 -adrenoreceptor agonist activity (1), in general, these compounds are uncharged, water-soluble, and relatively small molecules. An aqueous solution of a β2 -agonist drug may be administered in aerosolized form from a pneumatic or ultrasonic nebulizer. Alternatively, the drug can be suspended in micronized form in a fluorocarbon propellant solvent, and delivered in metered dose from a pressurized cannister. Following aerosolization, most of the propellant solvent is lost through flash evaporation and replaced by moisture in the respiratory tract, leading to the deposition of hydrated micronized particles.
Both types of inhalation systems mentioned above are based on delivery of the drug in a free form to sites in the respiratory tract. As such, the drug is rapidly utilized and also in the case of pulmonary deposition, rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream. Because of the rapid drug uptake and utilization, it is generally necessary to administer the drug at frequent intervals to maintain a desired therapeutic dose level at the site of action. Rapid uptake into the bloodstream also limits the amount of drug that can be administered safely with each administration. β-adrenergic agonists generally produce some degree of tachycardia and dizziness, and even at relatively low dose levels, these stimulatory effects are unpleasant to the patient. An additional problem associated with administration of micronized particles is the irritation that these particles may produce in the respiratory tract.
A variety of methods and apparatus which are designed to produce liposome-based aerosols, for drug delivery by inhalation, have been proposed heretofore. UK patent application GB 2,145,107A describes an aerosol device which brings aqueous and organic-solvent phase solutions together under pressure, and passes the mixture through a nozzle to form aerosolized liposomes. EPO patent application 0,158,441 discloses liposome formation, in aerosol form, from a water/lipid/ethanol mixture. In PCT application WO 86/01714, it is proposed to spray lipid droplets in a volatile liquid carrier, with liposome formation occurring upon contact of the droplets with a moist aqueous surface. UK patent application GB 2,170,815 describes a system in which an aqueous solution is emulsified in a lipid-containing propellant solvent, then sprayed through an atomizing nozzle to form lipid-coated droplets which can form liposomes upon contact With a moist surface. All of these approaches are characterized by "in situ" liposome formation, and as such, the concentration and size of the liposomes formed, and the percentage of drug entrapment in the liposomes will vary from one dose delivery to another, depending upon temperature, extent of solvent mixing, and the total and relative amounts of solvent components present in the system. Thus each of these systems would be difficult to adapt for metered dose delivery, where a reproducible amount of liposome-encapsulated drug is needed.
Further, although the above disclosures indicate that a variety of drugs, including bronchodilators, may be delivered in liposomal form, none of the references demonstrate how or whether liposome drug delivery effects the pharmacokinetic action of a liposome-entrapped drug in the respiratory tract. In particular, it is not known from these earlier references how liposomes behave in the respiratory-tract environment, how β2 -agonist activity would be effected by the presence of liposomal lipids, and whether liposomes can significantly modulate drug release and side effects observed with β2 -agonist, particularly at low drug dosage.
Co-pending patent application for "Liposome Inhalation Method and System" U.S. Ser. No. 737,221, filed May 22, 1985 and now abandoned, discloses a liposome-based aerosol system for delivering a drug, at a controlled release rate, via the respiratory tract. The invention is based on two discoveries: First, that initial systemic-uptake spiking effects due to initial systemic uptake of drugs from the site of administration in the respiratory tract can be eliminated or greatly reduced by administering the drug in a predominantly liposome-encapsulated form. Secondly, it was found that the rate of release of a water-soluble drug from a drug/liposome composition delivered to the respiratory tract can be modulated over a wide range, according to the acyl-chain composition of the phospholipids making up the liposomes. As a rule, slower drug release rates correlate with longer in vitro drug efflux half lives in serum. The liposome aerosol compositions used in these studies were prepared under conditions in which the drug was predominantly in liposome-encapsulated form, and the liposome suspensions were delivered in metered dose form from a fixed-volume nebulizer.
Co-pending patent application for "Liposome Concentrate and Method", U.S. Ser. No. 860,528, filed May 7, 1986 and now abandoned, addresses another aspect of effective drug delivery in a liposome-based inhalation system: that of delivering a water-soluble, liposome-permeable drug in predominantly encapsulated form, from a dilute aqueous liposome suspension. The method of the invention involves preparing and storing a liposome/drug suspension initially in paste form, then diluting the paste to a concentration suitable for aerosolizing.
Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 937,607, filed Dec. 3, 1986 now U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,323, additionally showed that administration of the β2 -agonist metaproteranol sulfate (MPS) in liposomal form via inhalation reduced initial plasma levels of the drug more than about 8 fold with respect to free drug, and that plasma levels remained substantially constant over a two hour period, compared with a rapid drop in plasma levels of the drug administered by inhalation in free form. At the levels of MPS which were studied, the percent protection against bronchoconstriction provided by the drug was about the same for both free drug and liposomal-entrapped drug.
It has now been discovered, according to one aspect of the present invention, that by encapsulating β2 -adrenoreceptor agonists in liposome-entrapped form, and administering the liposome-drug composition in metered form, at a therapeutic drug dose (i.e., minimum dose required for optimal or near-optimal short-term therapeutic effect), that β2 -agonists produce significantly greater bronchodilation, over an extended time period, than is produced by the the same amount of β2 -agonist delivered to the respiratory tract in a free-drug aerosol form.
The system of the invention includes a liposome composition containing a β2 -adrenoreceptor agonist in liposome-entrapped form, and a device for aerosolizing, in a form suitable for inhalation, a metered quantity of the composition. The metered drug quantity contains an amount of liposome-entrapped β2 -agonist which, when delivered to the respiratory tract in aerosol form, produces a substantially greater degree of bronchodilation 1-2 hours after drug administration than is produced by the the same amount of β2 -agonist delivered to the respiratory tract in a free-drug aerosol form.
In one preferred embodiment, the liposome position contains the β2 -agonist predominantly in liposome-entrapped form. The rate of release of drug from the liposomes may be modulated according to the acyl-chain composition of the lipids forming the liposomes.
In one delivery device, the liposome composition is a liposome paste in which more than 50% of the aqueous phase is encapsulated within the liposomes. The delivery device includes a mixing chamber in which a measured volume of paste is mixed with at least 1-2 volumes of aqueous medium immediately before aerosolization. In a second delivery device, the liposome composition includes a suspension of spray-dried liposomes in a propellant solvent. The delivery device is a pressurized cannister containing the suspension under pressure, and a valve for releasing a selected volume of the suspension in aerosolized form.
In the method of the invention, a liposome composition of the type described above is administered by aerosolizing, in a form suitable for inhalation. The liposome-entrapped drug is administered in a metered dose containing an amount of liposome-entrapped β2 -agonist which, when delivered to the respiratory tract in a liposome aerosol form, produces substantially greater bronchodilation, 1-2 hours after drug administration, than is produced by the the same amount of β2 -agonist delivered to the respiratory tract in a free-drug aerosol form.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent when the following detailed description of the invention is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIGS. 1A and 1B are plots showing percent increase in heart rate in test subjects following treatment with free MPS (open squares in the figures), and MPS encapsulated in liposomes with relatively high (1A) and low (1B) rates of drug release;
FIG. 2 shows plasma concentrations of MPS in test subjects following administration of free drug (open squares) and drug encapsulated in each of the FIG. 1 liposome formulations;
FIG. 3 is a plot showing percent increase in heart rate in test subjects following administration by inhalation of free metaproteranol sulfate (MPS)(open squares) or MPS-encapsulated in liposomes having relatively long (closed circles) or relatively short (open circles) in vitro drug efflux rates;
FIG. 4 is a plot showing percent protection against acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction in test subjects following administration of MPS, as in FIG. 3;
FIGS. 5A and 5B show changes in airway resistance (5A) and lung compliance (5B) caused by bronchoprovocation with aerosol histamine solutions after administration of terbutaline sulfate, via the respiratory tract, in free (open squares) and liposomal (crosses) form; and
FIGS. 6A and 6B show changes in airway resistance (6A) and lung compliance (6B) caused by bronchoprovocation with aerosol histamine solutions after administration of salbutamol sulfate, via the respiratory tract, in free (open squares) and liposomal (crosses) form.
The preferred liposome composition of the present invention is formulated to contain (a) the β2 -agonist drug predominantly in liposome-entrapped form, and (b) a lipid composition designed to produce a desired drug-release rate when the liposomes are administered to the respiratory tract. Section IA below considers the relationship between liposome bilayer components and drug-release rates. Section IB describes methods for preparing liposomes containing entrapped drugs. Methods of forming liposome compositions containing a drug in predominantly liposome-entrapped form are discussed in Sections IC and ID.
In studies conducted in support of the present invention and reported in Examples I-III, the effects of lipid acyl chain length and degree of unsaturation, lipid charge, and presence of sterol on in vitro drug efflux rates from liposomes were examined. Of factors which were studied, the most important is acyl chain length and the degree of unsaturation in the phospholipid(s) forming the liposomes. The study reported in Example I shows that the in vitro drug efflux half life (a measure of the time required for one-half of the liposome-entrapped drug to be released from the liposomes on incubation in vitro) can vary over a hundredfold or more, according to acyl chain length and degree of unsaturation. In forty different lipid mixtures which were studied, increasing either acyl chain length, or the degree of saturation of phospholipid acyl chains, led to greater drug efflux half lives, with the most significant increases being observed when the liposomes included a significant proportion of lipids whose transition temperature (Tc) are above the temperature at which the efflux half lives are measured, e.g., 37� C.
Studies on the effect of lipid charge on drug efflux rates, reported in Example II, indicate that the addition of a negatively charged lipid, such as phosphatidylglycerol (PG), at a mole ratio of about 10%, produces a slight to moderate increase in drug half life. The lipid-charge Effect is dependent somewhat on the degree of saturation and chain length in the charged and uncharged lipids used in forming the liposomes, with the charged lipid producing a greater increase in drug half life where the liposomes are formed of predominantly shorter and/or unsaturated lipids, and producing less effect in the case of longer-chain and/or saturated lipids.
The effect of sterol, either cholesterol or the negatively charged cholesterolhemisuccinate, on drug efflux from liposomes is considered in Example III. An initial study involved liposomes formed with one of eight PC lipids or lipid mixtures and cholesterol, at a PC/cholesterol mole ratio of 60:40. In general, cholesterol was found to have a moderating effect on the acyl composition of the phospholipid, slightly increasing drug half lives in liposomes containing predominantly unsaturated and shorter-chain length PCs, and producing a significant decrease in the drug half lives in liposomes containing predominantly longer-chain and more saturated phospholipids. This moderating effect may be due to the known effect of cholesterol in decreasing the fluidity of unsaturated membranes (which would produce greater efflux half lives) and increasing the fluidity of saturated membranes (which would produce shorter half lives).
A negatively charged sterol, such as cholesterol hemisuccinate, when formulated with uncharged phospholipid(s), appears to have little effect on drug efflux rates over that observed in liposomes formed from uncharged phospholipids and cholesterol (Example III). Surprisingly, however, the drug half lives observed in liposomes composed of uncharged phospholipids and cholesterol are enhanced significantly by the addition of negatively charged phospholipid (10 mole percent PG). As seen from the data presented in Table 5 of Example III, in nearly all of the PC mixtures which were studied, the addition of 10 mole percent PG to liposomes also containing PC (50 mole percent) and cholesterol (40 mole percent) enhanced the drug half life more than twofold, and in some cases more than threefold over those observed for liposomes composed of PC and cholesterol only. The combination of a neutral phospholipid, such as PC, a charged phospholipid, such as PG, and cholesterol appears particularly advantageous in achieving a range of drug half lives, as measured at 37� C., of between about 2 and 24 hours.
The lipids forming the liposomes may, of course, include phospholipids and sterols other than the model lipids used in the above-mentioned studies, and may also include other types of lipids, such as glycolipids and sphingolipids, which are compatible with liposome formation. A list of lipids which are used commonly in liposome formation is given on page 471 of reference 2. The liposomes may also be formulated to include various types of drug-protective or lipid-protective agents, such as the antoxidant α-tocopherol, which was typically included at a 1.0 mole percent in the liposomes described herein.
The studies lust described, and reported in detail in Examples I-III were carried out with the β2 -agonist metaproteranol sulfate (MPS), a water-soluble, liposome-permeable drug. The results also apply to other β2 -agonists, such as albuterol (salbutamol) sulfate, ephidrine sulfate, ephidrine bitartrate, isoetharine hydrochloride, isoetharine mesylate, isoproteranol hydrochloride, isoproteranol sulfate, metaproteranol sulfate, terbutaline sulfate, procaterol, and bitolterol mesylate, which are water soluble, uncharged, and about the same size as MPS.
Where the liposomes are prepared for suspension, in spray-dried form, in a propellant solvent, it is also advantageous to select lipids whose phase transition is above the drying temperature used in spray drying. As a rule, drying temperatures of at least about 37� C. and preferably above about 40� C. are used for spray drying. Accordingly, lipid components, such as phosphatidylcholine (PC), used in liposome preparation will contain partially or largely saturated acyl-chain moieties. Methods for spray drying liposomes are given in Section ID below.
The liposomes may be prepared by a variety of techniques, such as those detailed in reference 2. One preferred method for preparing drug-containing liposomes is the reverse phase evaporation method described in reference 3 and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,871. In this method, a solution of liposome-forming lipids is mixed with a smaller volume of an aqueous solution of the β2 -agonist drug, and the mixture is dispersed to form a water-in-oil emulsion. After removing the lipid solvent by evaporation, the resulting gel is converted to liposomes, with an encapsulation efficiency, for a water-soluble drug, of up to 50%. The reverse phase evaporation vesicles (REVs) have typical average sizes between about 2-4 microns and are predominantly oligolamellar, that is, contain one or a few lipid bilayer shells. The oligolamellar nature of the vesicles may facilitate drug efflux and thus contribute to a lower efflux half life for an encapsulated drug.
A simple lipid-hydration procedure for producing multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) may be preferred where high drug encapsulation efficiency is not desired. In this procedure, a mixture of liposome-forming lipids dissolved in a suitable solvent is evaporated in a vessel to form a thin film, which is then covered by an aqueous solution of the drug. The lipid film hydrates to form MLVs, typically with sizes between about 0.1 to 10 microns. As in the REV method, the β2 -agonist drug to be encapsulated is contained in the hydrating medium, and is encapsulated upon formation of the liposomes.
Following liposome preparation, the dispersion can be treated by extrusion to reduce overall liposome size and particle size heterogeneity. Reducing liposome particle size may be important in achieving efficient aerosolization of the liposomes, and in maximizing drug deposition in a desired portion of the respiratory tract. Experiments conducted in support of the present invention indicate that liposomes contained in an aqueous suspension may be aerosolized efficiently in the form of liposome-containing aqueous particle mist, where the liposomes are predominantly less than about 1 micron in diameter. In terms of targeting the liposomes to a particular region of the respiratory tract, it is advantageous to produce liposomes whose sizes are compatible with a desired size range of mist particles. For example, mist particle sizes of greater than about 5 microns would favor deposition in the upper respiratory-tract regions, and particle sizes of between about 0.5-1.5 microns would favor deposition in lower pulmonary regions of the respiratory tract. Generally liposomes having particle sizes less than about 1 micron are compatible with a wide range of mist particle sizes, e.g., from 1-10 microns. As will be seen below, where the liposomes are aerosolized in the form of an aqueous mist, the actual sizes of particles carrying the liposomes may be much greater than that of the liposomes themselves, and thus actual liposome size becomes less crucial to targeting.
One effective sizing method involves extruding an aqueous suspension of the liposomes through a polycarbonate membrane having a selected uniform pore size, typically 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 or 1 micron (reference 3). The pore size of the membrane corresponds roughly to the largest sizes of liposomes produced by extrusion through that membrane, particularly where the preparation is extruded two or more times through the same membrane. This method of liposome sizing is used in preparing the liposomes described in the several examples below. A more recent method involves extrusion through an asymmetric ceramic filter. The method is detailed in co-owned U.S. patent application for Liposome Extrusion Method, Ser. No. 829,710, filed Feb. 13, 1986 now U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,323.
The liposomes may be further treated to remove unencapsulated drugs and/or other solute material. Conventional separation techniques, such as centrifugation, diafiltration, and molecular-sieve chromatography are suitable. The separation step should be carried out after sizing, since the sizing procedure itself can lead to liposome rupture and release of encapsulated drug. It will be appreciated that free drug removal will be necessary to remove the water-soluble, liposome-impermeable B-agonist drug from the liposome dispersion.
As indicated above, the liposome composition preferably contains the β2 -agonist drug predominantly in liposome-encapsulated form, i.e, in a form in which more than half, and preferably about 70% or more of the total drug is present in liposome encapsulated or liposome-entrapped form. One composition which contains predominantly encapsulated β2 -agonist is a liposome paste in which the encapsulated volume of aqueous medium is greater than about 50% and preferably about 70-75% of the total suspension volume, reflecting the approximate percentage of liposome encapsulated drug.
In a preferred method of forming the paste, a relatively dilute liposome dispersion, prepared as above, is concentrated by ultrafiltration, and more preferably, tangential-flow ultrafiltration. Briefly, the dispersion is recycled continuously through a frame-and-plate type filtration device having one or more filtration units, each composed of a central filtrate screen and a pair of filters supported on the upper and lower sides of screen. The dispersion is pumped under pressure across both membranes, and aqueous medium is drawn though the filters across a pressure gradient of typically about 5-25 psi, with higher gradients being required as the recycled material becomes more concentrated. The material is recycled through the system until a desired liposome concentration, which can be as high as 70-75% liposomes, expressed in percentage of liposome-encapsulated volume, is achieved. The ultrafiltration membranes used in the device may be conventional membranes, such as polysulfone, nylon, or cellulose acetate membranes which have a size cutoff of between about 10,000-100,000 daltons.
Other concentration methods, such as drying and centrifugation to pellet liposomes, may also be used to form the liposome concentrate of the invention, although ultrafiltration is preferred, because of advantages of sterility, large-volume capacity, and relatively mild conditions to which the liposomes are exposed.
A second preferred liposome composition, according to the invention, is a suspension of dried liposomes particles in a propellant solvent. The liposomes particles are formed preferably by spray drying a dilute aqueous suspension of liposomes, according to conventional procedures. Briefly, the liposome suspension which is spray dried is preferably a 3-6% by weight suspension of liposomes containing a predominance of partially or totally hydrogenated lipid components, such as PC, whose phase transition temperature is above the drying temperature to be used in the drier, typically between about 40�-45� C. The drying apparatus is itself a conventional spray dry machine, such as a Buchi 190 Mini Spray Dryer. The liposome suspension is pumped through an atomizer in spray form and dried by a stream of heated air or nitrogen which carries the liposomes into a spiral collection chamber. Exemplary temperature conditions are: 41� C. for the initial liposome suspension temperature and drying gas stream, and 31� C. for the collection chamber.
The propellant solvent is one in which (a) liposomes can be suspended without damaging the lipid integrity of the particles, and (b) the drug has a relatively low partition coefficient with respect to water, such that the bulk of the drug remains associated with the liposomes. Example V below examines the stability of liposome emulsions in six fluorocarbon propellants. The propellants which were tested are "Freon 11" (CCl3 F), "Freon 12" (CCl2 F2), "Freon 22" (CHClF2), "Freon 113" (CCl2 FCClF2), "Freon 114" (CClF2 CClF2), and "Freon 115" (CClF2 CF3). Three different formulations of liposomes were tested, and all showed good stability in Freon 113, 114, and 115. Best stability was achieved with liposomes containing saturated acyl-chain-phospholipids. It is noted here that Freon 114 and 115 can be mixed in proportions which give a proper vapor pressure at room temperature for an aerosol canister.
To form the desired composition, the spray-dried liposomes are added to the selected propellant or propellant mixture, to a final liposome concentration of about 1 to 20 percent by weight propellant. The liposomes/propellant suspension is packaged in a conventional cannister equipped with a metering valve, as described below.
This section describes exemplary devices useful in delivering liposome compositions of the type described above in nebulized or atomized, metered-dose form. These devices are discussed below in relation to the three general types of liposome suspensions to be nebulized.
Pneumatic nebulizers which are designed for atomizing aqueous sample are commercially available, and operate according to well-known procedures, such as those outlined in Example IV. Typically, the nebulizing operation is carried out at a pressure of about 5-15 psi, and the aqueous particles formed are typically in the range of about 2-6 microns. The device may be controlled to produce a measured quantity of aerosolized liposomes, according to known operational variables (reference 4).
Because the aerosolization procedure may result in mechanical disruption of a liposome suspension, it may be important to establish that the nebulizing process does not significantly affect liposome integrity and size. The effect of aerosolization by a pneumatic nebulizer on liposome particle size and loss of encapsulated material is reported in Example IV. Here four liposome compositions having in vitro drug efflux half lives ranging from 206 minutes to 5256 minutes, and each having an original particle size distribution between about 0.180-0.300 microns, were examined for size change and loss of encapsulated material after aerosolization at 5 psi. As reported in Table 7 of Example IV, no change in liposome size or loss of encapsulated material was observed for three of the preparations, and only a slight loss of encapsulated material and moderate increase in size was observed for liposomes with the lowest drug efflux half life.
Another device suitable for aerosolizing an aqueous suspension of liposomes, and preferably a relatively dilute suspension containing less than about 25%-30% encapsulated aqueous volume, uses ultrasonic energy to break up a carrier fluid into a fine mist of aqueous particles. The ultrasonic nebulizer device has been found to produce a liposome aerosol mist whose particle sizes are about the same as those formed by a compressed air nebulizer, i.e., between about 2-6 microns. The effect on liposome size and retention of encapsulated material by ultrasonic aerosolization was examined in a study similar to the one just described, and also reported in Example IV below. The results of that study, summarized in Table 8 in Example IV, are consistent with the earlier study, showing that the aerosolizing process has substantially no effect on liposome size or release of encapsulated material, except a relatively minor effect on the liposomes composed predominantly of short, unsaturated acyl chain lipids.
For aerosolizing a liposome paste of the type used for delivery of a water-soluble, liposome-permeable drug, the paste is first mixed with a carrier solvent, to form a diluted dispersion which can be aerosolized. The carrier solvent may be an aqueous medium, in which case the paste is diluted to a form suitable for spraying, such as by a pneumatic or ultrasonic nebulizer. The amount of diluent added is sufficient to dilute the paste to a sprayable dispersion, preferably containing less than about 30% total encapsulated volume. Assuming the paste has an initial encapsulated volume of 70-75% of the total paste volume, it can be appreciated that a given volume of the paste must be diluted with at least one and two volumes of diluent.
A suitable aerosolizing device for the making and spraying the emulsion includes (1) separate chambers for holding the paste and carrier vehicle liquids, (2) a mixing chamber where metered amounts of the two liquids are mixed, and (3) means for aerosolizing the contents of the mixing chamber. Dispensing devices designed for storing two different liquids in isolation from each other, and for intermittent dispensing of the liquids in contact with each other are known, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,325,056. Where the device operates to mix the paste with an aqueous carrier medium, the pneumatic or ultrasonic energy used to produce aerosolization can also be used to effect rapid and complete mixing of the two fluids. The releasing means includes a valve structure communicating with the mixing chamber, to allow release of the contents of the mixing chamber through a nozzle. Here it is noted that the mixing and spraying steps are carried out in relatively quick succession, before appreciable leakage of encapsulated drug into the aqueous carrier vehicle can occur, i.e., while the drug is still predominantly in liposome-encapsulated form.
Valved container devices for aerosolizing particulate material suspended in a propellant solvent are well known. These devices generally operate by supplying a particle suspension to a metering chamber, and forcing the contents of the chamber through a nozzle under pressure, to aerosolize a metered quantity of the suspension. In the present invention, the particle/propellant suspension is preferably a suspension of spray-dried lipids in a propellant solvent, formed as in Section ID. The suspension is bottled and stored in a pressurized cannister in the device, in a conventional manner. The concentration of liposomes in the pressurized suspension is as to supply, in each metered dose, a therapeutic dose of the β2 -agonist drug.
β2 -adrenoreceptor agonists are used as bronchodilators in the treatment of bronchial asthma, emphysema, bronchitis, and bronchiectasis, and also in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease and shock, and may also be used to delay delivery in cases of premature labor.
One undesired side effect of β2 -agonists, as noted above, is short term tachycardia, resulting from uptake of the drug from the respiratory tract into the bloodstream. Earlier studies reported in the above-mentioned co-pending patent applications for "Inhalation Method and System", have demonstrated that drug delivery in liposomal form eliminates or significantly reduces the high, initial increase in heart rate seen when β2 -agonist drugs, such as MPS, are administered to the lung in free form,
This liposome-protective effect is illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B, which graph percent increases in heart rate, above a pre-drug level, in animals receiving a β2 -agonist in free (open squares), or liposomal form. The two liposomal formulations are characterized by relatively short drug-release half life (open circles, FIG. 1A), or a relatively long drug-release half life (closed circles, FIG. 1B). Heart rate was measured at 15, 45, 75, and 105 minutes after drug administration, and immediately before the animal received a bronchoconstricting dose of histamine by inhalation. As seen, free drug produced a relatively high initial heart rate increase, with a slow decline over the test period. With liposome-encapsulated drug, however, the increase in heart rate was substantially lower and more constant over the test period. It is also evident from a comparison of the liposome-drug data in FIGS. 1A and 1B that the extent of systemic drug effects can be modulated significantly according to drug-release characteristics of the liposomes.
The reduction in tachycardia is consistent with blood plasma drug levels measured during the same test period, as seen in FIG. 2. In animals receiving free-drug, blood levels rose to nearly 80 ng/ml within 15 minutes of drug administration, then fell slowly over a two-hour period to about 20 ng/ml. By contrast, blood levels of MPS in animals receiving the drug in liposomal form reached a high of about 12 ng/ml in the less stable liposomes, and about 7 ng/ml in the more stable liposomes.
A second study, which examined both the increase in heart rate and drug protection against bronchoconstriction (increase in airway resistance), over an extended drug-response time, is detailed in Example VI. The data on increased heart rate in response to a single administration of drug in free or liposomal form are seen in FIG. 3, where the symbols in the figure represent the same free-drug or liposomal drug formulations as in FIGS. 1 and 2. The data support the findings of the earlier study: that liposomes significantly reduce systemic side effects, and the degree of reduction can be controlled within limits by the lipid composition of the liposomes.
FIG. 4 shows the degree of protection against bronchoconstriction provided by the various free and liposomal formulations. This parameter reflects the increase in airway resistance (bronchoconstriction) immediately after administration of acetylcholine to induce bronchoconstriction. That is, the percent protection indicates the percent increase in airway resistance relative to a pre-drug level, following acetylcholine. As seen from FIG. 4, the degree of protection provided by drug encapsulated in either of two different liposome formulations was substantially the same as for free drug, over an approximately four-hour test period. It is noted that this study involved relatively high dose levels of MPS (which were needed to protect against the severe bronchoconstriction induced by the acetylcholine aerosols).
Summarizing the results of the earlier studies, administration of a β2 -agonist drug in liposomal form to the respiratory tract significantly reduces side effects related to systemic drug uptake, and at high drug concentrations, gives substantially the same degree of protection against bronchoconstriction over a several-hour period, as the free drug.
It has now been discovered, in studies reported herein, that β2 -agonist drugs, when administered at a therapeutic dose in liposome aerosol form, provide significantly greater bronchodilation at extended times after drug administration (greater than about 1 hour after drug administration) than does the same amount of drug administered in free form. The study described in Example VII illustrates the increased protection, at extended time periods, achievable with liposomal drug administration. Briefly summarizing the Example VII study, terbutaline sulfate or salbutamol sulfate, in either free or liposomal form, was administered by inhalation. At several times after drug administration, the test animal was challenged with aerosolized histamine, to induce bronchoconstriction. At the beginning of each test, prior to administration of the β2 -agonist, and immediately after each histamine dose, airway resistance and lung compliance in the animal were measured. Airway resistance, which is measured at points of equal lung volume during the breathing cycle, provides a measure of the resistance to gas flow through the large air passages of the lung. Lung compliance, which is measured at zero flow points in the breathing cycle, reflects the pressure changes required to effect the lung volume change over the breathing cycle. The resistance and compliance values determined at the beginning of the test serve as baseline values for determining the percentage changes in resistance and compliance, in response to histamine-induced bronchoconstriction.
The therapeutic doses of terbutaline sulfate, and salbutamol sulfate which were used in the present study were determined as follows. Recommended human doses, based on drug/body weight, as suggested by the drug supplier, were assumed to be approximately the minimum doses which produce maximal or near-maximal short-term protection against bronchoconstriction. These drug doses, adjusted for the body weight of the test animal, were administered by inhalation in free form, and their effects on the histamine-induced bronchoconstriction were determined as above. MPS was also tested in the initial drug-dose study. Of the three drugs tested, salbutamol provided good protection against bronchoconstriction at the recommended dose. For both MPS and terbutaline, it was necessary to double the recommended dose in order to achieve effective protection. The therapeutic doses per animal determined from the the study were: 39 μg MPS (2� recommended dose); 15 μg terbutaline (2� recommended dose); and 1.5 μg salbutamol (1� recommended dose). The therapeutic dose of MPS is approximately 60 times less than the dose used in the experiments reported above, and in Example VI.
FIG. 5A shows changes in airway resistance measured in animals treated with a therapeutic dose of either free (open squares) or liposome-entrapped (crosses) terbutaline sulfate. The liposomes employed in the study have the same composition as the Preparation-2 liposomes employed in the study above, i.e., have a drug release half life of about 250 minutes in vitro. Each time point was calculated as the difference in airway resistance shortly after histamine administration and at the beginning of the test (baseline value) divided by the baseline value. Thus the initial resistance values of 60% in the figure indicate a 60% increase in airway resistance with respect to baseline. Both free and liposomal drug formulations provide about the same degree of initial protection against bronchoconstriction. However, whereas airway resistance increased to about 95% with the liposomal form of the drug, at the end of the 115 minutes test period, it increased to over 160% in the same period with free drug administration. Thus, the liposomal form of the drug provides substantially greater protection against bronchoconstriction, at times greater than 1 hour after drug administration, than the same therapeutic dose free drug.
FIG. 5B shows changes in lung compliance under the same test conditions. At all time points at which bronchoconstriction was induced, the lung compliance after histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was substantially greater than that in animals receiving the drug in free form.
A similar study was conducted with salbutamol sulfate, which was administered at a therapeutic dose in either free (open squares) or liposome-encapsulated (crosses) form. The data plotting changes in airway resistance and lung compliance as a function of time after drug administration are shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B. The data are consistent with the results seen with terbutaline, showing that the liposomal form of the drug provides substantially greater protection against bronchoconstriction, at times after about 1 hour, than does the free drug.
From the foregoing, it can be appreciated that the method and system of the invention provide several advantages over free drug administration of β2 -agonists, for treatment of bronchoconstriction. First, undesired side effects due to rapid uptake of free drug from the lungs are largely avoided. Therefore, increased heart rate, dizziness, insomnia and other symptoms frequently complained of are eliminated or minimized. Further, even at doses which are minimal for effective free-drug bronchodilation, administration of the drug in liposomal form gives initial protection against bronchoconstriction which is comparable to that of the free drug.
The greater protection against bronchial constriction seen more than about an hour after drug administration has two obvious benefits. First, the patient receives longer periods of relief with each dosing, and therefore the intervals between dosing can be extended, and greater patient compliance can be achieved. Secondly, in terms of long-term patient health, the stress of frequent and transient side effects are reduced.
The liposomes may also serve as a vehicle of codelivery of other drugs or protective agents. Further, the liposomes protect the respiratory tract from potential irritation that can be caused by inhalation of micronized drug particles sprayed from a propellant solvent.
The following examples illustrate various compositional parameters, methods of preparation and use, and pharmacokinetic characteristic of β2 -agonist/liposome compositions of the present invention. The example are intended to illustrate, but not limit, the scope of the invention.
Metaproteranol sulfate (MPS) was obtained from Vinchem Inc. (Chatham, N.J.); α-tocopherol (α-T), from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.); and 14 -C sucrose, from Amersham Co. (Arlington Hts, Ill.). Egg phosphatidyl choline (EPC), soy phosphatidyl choline (SPC), hydrogenated egg phosphatidyl choline (HEPC), hydrogenated soy phosphatidyl choline (HSPC), dioleoyl phosphatidyl choline (DOPC), dimyristoyl phosphatidyl choline (DMPC), dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline (DPPC), and distearoyl phosphatidyl choline (DSPC), were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, Ala.). The 8 PC lipids have the transition temperatures (Tc) and fatty acyl chain compositions given in Table 1 below, where the lipids having greater acyl chain lengths and/or degrees of saturation are arranged in descending order.
TABLE 1______________________________________PC Tc (C.�) Fatty Acyl Composition______________________________________SPC -15 to -7 16:0(12%) 18:2(73%)DOPC -22 18:1EPC -15 to -7 16:0(42%) 18:1(28%) 18:2(16%)DMPC 23 14:0DPPC 41 16:0HEPC 55 to 65 16:0(36%) 18:0(60%)HSPC 55 to 65 16:0(13%) 18:0(87%)DSPC 55 18:0______________________________________
For each of the 8 PC lipids, multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) were prepared by dissolving 350 μmole of the selected PC lipid with 1 mole percent of α-T in chloroform. The dissolved lipid was evaporated to dryness under vacuum in a round-bottom flask to form a lipid film on the flask walls. A 5 ml solution containing 20 mg/ml MPS and 1.1�107 cpm 14 C -sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2, 290 mOsm, was added to the flask to cover the film. At the end of a 2-hour hydration period, the liposomes (MLVs) which formed were extruded successively two times each through a 0.4 and 0.2 micron uniform pore-size polycarbonate filter (Bio-Rad; Richmond, Calif.). Unencapsulated MPS and sucrose were removed by passage of the extruded MLVs through a Sephadex G-75 gel-exclusion column. The percent encapsulation of MPS ranged from a low of about 0% for DMPC MLVs to a high of 21% for DPPC MLVs (Table 2). Encapsulation of 14 C-sucrose ranged from a low of 0.2% for DMPC MLVs to a high of 18% for the DPPC MLVs.
To measure leakage of encapsulated solutes from the MLV preparations, each preparation was incubated at 37� C. for a period of up to 42 hours. Timed aliquots taken periodically during the 42-hour incubation period were passed through a gel-exclusion column, and the lipid, MPS, and sucrose present in the liposome peak were assayed by conventional methods. The loss of lipid-associated drug during the course of the incubation was used to determine the drug efflux half life (t1/2) for each preparation, calculated as the time required for the drug/lipid ratio to fall by one-half. The calculated efflux half lives, expressed in minutes, are shown in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2______________________________________EncapsulationPC/α-T % MPS t1/2 MPS(10:0.1) Encapsulated (minutes)______________________________________SPC 6 22DOPC 4 41EPC 10 48DMPC 0 --DPPC 21 574HEPC 5 6426HSPC 8 2175DSPC 13 6366______________________________________
As seen from data in Table 2, the rate of efflux of drugs from the MLVs can be selectively increased from a half life of about 22 minutes to one showing no appreciable leakage over a 42-hour period, by increasing the length and degree of saturation of the acyl chains in the phospholipids making up the liposomes. A comparison of the half-life data in Table 2 with the transition temperature data in Table 1 shows that each of the MLV preparations having a relatively high efflux half life (greater than 500 minutes) is composed of a PC whose transition temperature is above the temperature at which the liposomes were incubated. No appreciable loss of the relatively impermeable 14 C-sucrose from the liposomes was detected over the 42 hour incubation period, indicating that the observed drug efflux is not due to liposome breakdown.
Egg phosphatidyl glycerol (EPG), dioleoyl phosphatidyl glycerol (DOPC), and distearoyl phosphatidyl choline (DSPC) were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, Ala.).
Liposomes (MLVs) containing the lipid composition indicated at the left in Table 3 below, were prepared substantially as described in Example I, starting with initial concentrations of 312 μmole of the selected PC, 35 μmole of the selected PG, and 3.5 μmole α-T. For each lipid composition, the dried film was hydrated in 5 ml of the MPS/sucrose solution described in Example I, and the liposomes were sized by extrusion through polycarbonate filters and separated from non-encapsulated material by molecular-sieve chromatography, as above. The percentages of encapsulated MPS are shown in the middle column in Table 3. A comparison of the encapsulation data from Tables 2 and 3 shows that the presence of 10% PG generally increased drug encapsulation efficiencies. This effect was also observed for 14 C-sucrose encapsulation.
The eight MLV fractions were each incubated at 37� C. for 42 hours, and the drug efflux half lives determined from the measured loss of drug at several intervals over the 42-hour incubation period. The calculated efflux rate half lives are shown at the right in Table 3.
TABLE 3______________________________________PC/PG/α-T % MPS t1/2(9:1:0.1) Encapsulated (minutes)______________________________________SPC/EPG 14 92DOPC/DOPG 13 289EPC/EPG 7 151DPPC/EPG 16 110DPPC/DPPG 23 5256HEPC/EPG 15 526HSPC/EPG 14 856DSPC/DSPG 20 14100______________________________________
The addition of 10 mole percent PG to the liposome/lipid mixture had one of two effects relative to PCs alone (Example I). For the shorter, more unsaturated PC acyl chains, an increase in half life for MPS leakage was seen as a result of the negative charge imparted to the bilayer by PG. With the saturated, longer chain length lipids, the more important factor seems to be the degree of acyl chain unsaturation of the added PG--for example, in the case of EPG, decreasing the overall membrane saturation and thus decreasing measured half lives for MPS leakage. Where a PG derivative of the same saturation chain length as the PC was used (DPPG/DSPG), similar or longer half-lives than with PC alone resulted. As in Example I, no appreciable loss of 14 C-sucrose was observed in any of the preparations.
Eight liposome MLV preparations containing one of the eight PCs shown at the left in Table 4, cholesterol (CH), and α-T in a molar ratio of 6:4:0.1, and containing encapsulated MPS and 14 C-labeled sucrose, were prepared as in Example I. The MLV preparations, after extrusion through 0.4 and 0.2 polycarbonate membranes and treatment with molecular-sieve chromatography to remove unencapsulated material, gave the percent encapsulation of MPS indicated in the middle column in Table 4.
The eight MLV fractions were each incubated for a 42-hour period to determine drug efflux half lives in accordance with the methods described above. The calculated half lives are shown at the right in Table 4.
TABLE 4______________________________________PC/CH/α-T t1/2(6:4:0.1) % Encapsulated MPS (minutes)______________________________________SPC/CH 8 103DOPC/CH 9 313EPC/CH 10 206DMPC/CH 9 201DPPC/CH 11 146HEPC/CH 11 220HSPC/CH 10 330DSPC/CH 13 421______________________________________
In the presence of 40 mole percent cholesterol, drug efflux half lives associated with unsaturated, shorter-chain lipids were longer than those obtained for PC alone. For the more saturated, longer chain-length lipids, 40 mole percent cholesterol decreased half lives significantly over that observed for PC alone.
The effect of cholesterol and PG was examined in a similar type of study using MLVs composed of 50 mole percent of a selected PC, 10 mole percent of a selected PG, 40 mole percent of cholesterol, and 0.1 mole percent α-T, as indicated at the left in Table 5. The drug encapsulation data for the eight MLV preparations and the corresponding drug efflux half lives are shown at the middle and right columns, respectively, in Table 5. As seen, the presence of 10 mole percent PG significantly increased the drug efflux half lives of each PC lipid with respect to the Table 4 lipid composition containing PC and cholesterol only.
TABLE 5______________________________________PC/PG/CH/α-T % t1/2(5:1:1:0.1) Encapsulated MPS (minutes)______________________________________SPC/EPG/CH 10 326DOPC/DOPG/CH 11 235EPC/EPG/CH 12 250DMPC/DMPG/CH 10 591DPPC/DPPG/CH 12 941HEPC/EPG/CH 13 334HSPC/EPG/CH 12 553DSPC/DSPG/CH 27 1148______________________________________
Finally, eight liposome preparations containing one of the PC lipids indicated at the left in Table 6 (60 mole percent); cholesterol hemisuccinate, a negatively charged sterol (40 mole percent); and 0.1 mole percent α-T were prepared as above. CHHS was obtained from Sigma Chem Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). The eight preparations gave the encapsulation efficiencies and drug efflux half lives indicated in the middle and right columns, respectively, in Table 6 below. As seen, the presence of 40 mole percent cholesterol hemisuccinate gave uniformly high encapsulation efficiencies. The half lives are generally somewhat greater than those observed with the corresponding liposome preparations involving 40 mole percent cholesterol (Table 4 above), but significantly less than the corresponding lipid preparations containing 40 mole percent cholesterol plus 10 mole percent PG.
TABLE 6______________________________________PC/CHHS/α-T % t1/2(9:1:0.1) Encapsulated MPS (minutes)______________________________________SPC/CHHS 19 73DOPC/CHHS 19 123EPC/CHHS 24 77DMPC/CHHS 20 129DPPC/CHHS l8 245HEPC/CHHS 20 601HSPC/CHHS 19 856DSPC/CHHS 23 768______________________________________
This section examines the effect on liposome integrity, as judged by loss of encapsulated material and change in liposome size, of aerosolizing an aqueous liposome suspension.
Four liposome preparations were tested. Preparation #1 had a composition EPC/CH/α-T, at a molar ratio of 6:4:0.1; preparation #2, a composition of DSPC/CH/α-T, at a molar ratio of 6:4:0.1; preparation #3, a composition of DPPC/DPPG/CH/α-T, at a molar ratio of 5:1:4:0.1; and preparation #4, a composition of DPPC/DPPG/α-T, at a molar ratio of 9:1:0.1. The four preparation represent a wide range of drug-efflux half lives, measured as in Examples I-III above, as indicated in Table 7 below. The liposomes were prepared substantially as described in Example I, except that the aqueous solution used in preparing the liposomes contained carboxyfluorescein (129 mM) rather than MPS and 14 C-labeled sucrose. Each of the four liposome preparations was extruded two times each through a 0.4 and 0.2 micron polycarbonate membrane to produce substantially homogeneous particle sizes in the particle size ranges indicated below in Tables 7 and 8 after the liposome suspensions were separated from unencapsulated material by extensive dialysis. The final concentration of liposomes in the aqueous suspension was 70 μmole total lipid per ml PBS.
For each lipid preparation, liposome size distribution and percent encapsulation was measured before aerosolization (B), after aerosolization (A), and in the suspension which remained in the nebulizer (R). The sizes of liposomes in the suspension were determined by using a Nicomp Instruments Laser Particle Sizer Model 200 (Hyak-Royco, Menlo Park, Calif.). The machine was calibrated periodically with monodisperse latex beads supplied by the manufacturer for use as external standards.
The percent encapsulated carboxyfluorescein was determined according to standard procedures.
The size and percent encapsulation data for liposome preparations before and after aerosolization by the pneumatic nebulizer are shown in Table 7 below. The device used was a De Vilbiss No. 646 Pneumatic Nebulizer (Somerset, Pa.), operated at 15 psi. As seen from the data, aerosolization of the liposomes resulted in only a small loss of encapsulated material, ranging from about 8% for the liposome preparation having the lowest efflux half life to about 1% for the material having the highest efflux half life. No significant change in the size distribution of liposomes was observed for any of the four liposome preparations after aerosolization.
TABLE 7______________________________________Preparation % Encap. � s.d.(n = 3) Median Lip. size (nm)______________________________________1 B 96.2 � 0.11 214, 210-218t1/2 = A 88.5 � 0.13 375, 315-428206 min. R 95.9 � 0.04 193, 189-2002 B 95.5 � 0.20 230, 214-268t1/2 = A 93.0 � 0.08 200, 180-240421 min. R 96.7 � 0.13 200, 190-2183 B 97.2 � 0.63 327, 271-450t1/2 = A 93.4 � 0.04 257, 225-327941 min. R 96.2 � 0.93 353, 300-4004 B 96.1 � 0.19 214, 193-231t1/2 = A 95.1 � 0.11 218, 171-2665256 min. R 96.5 � 0.02 225, 200-276______________________________________
The effect on the integrity of the four liposome preparations of aerosolization by an ultrasonic nebulizer was also examined. The nebulizer used was a DeVilbiss Pulmosonic Model 25 Ultrasonic Nebulizer (Somerset, Pa.), operated at a powder mode of 3 kHz. The percent carboxyfluorescein encapsulation and size distribution, measured as above, are shown in Table 8 below for each of the four preparations, measured before (B) and after (A) aerosolization and for material remaining in the nebulizer (R). The results are substantially identical with the results obtained for the same preparations aerosolized by a compressed-air device.
TABLE 8______________________________________Preparation % Encap. � s.d.(n = 3) Median Lip. size (nm)______________________________________1 B 95.6 � 0.10 316, 285-375 A 89.4 � 0.65 261, 250-279 R 94.9 � 0.45 207, 188-2222 B 98.6 � 0.08 240, 185-300 A 96.8 � 0.07 214, 200-240 R 97.7 � 0.53 163, 150-1893 B 98.1 � 0.09 257, 240-270 A 96.0 � 0.09 254, 244-270 R 97.2 � 0.10 240, 171-6004 B 98.5 � 0.02 333, 310-375 A 96.2 � 0.01 220, 204-231 R 96.8 � 0.03 220, 208-230______________________________________
This section examines the stability of three liposome preparations in chlorofluorocarbon propellant solvents. The first liposome preparation, referred to as formulation 1, contained DPPC/DPPG/α-T at a molar ratio of 9:1:0.1; the second preparation, designated formulation 2, contained EPC/EPG/α-T at a molar ratio of 9:1:0.1; and the third preparation, designated formulation 3, was composed of EPC/EPG/CH/α-T at a molar ratio of 5:1:4:0.1. The liposomes were prepared substantially as described in Example I, except that aqueous solution used in forming the MLVs contained bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 1 μM carboxyfluorescein (CF). MLV preparations extruded twice through each of a 0.4 and a 0.2 micron polycarbonate membrane were pelleted by centrifugation to remove unencapsulated material, and resuspended in PBS to a final lipid concentration of about 20 μmol/ml. The six propellant solvents used are "Freon 11" (CCl3 F), "Freon 12" (CCl2 F2), "Freon 22" (CHClF2), "Freon 113" (CCl2 FCClF2), "Freon 114" (CClF2 CClF2), and "Freon 115" (CClF2 CF).
An aqueous suspension of each preparation in PBS (3 ml) was added to each of the 6 fluorocarbon solvents (10 ml) in a pressurized vial, and the vials were shaken on a mechanical shaker for 24 hours to maintain a water-and-oil emulsion. After the shaking period, the bulk liquid phases in each vial were allowed to reform by settling, and the upper aqueous phase was removed by aspiration. The liposomes in the aqueous phase were pelleted by centrifugation, and resuspended to the original lipid concentration in PBS. A portion of the resuspended liposomes was examined for particle size distribution, substantially as described in Example IV. A control sample, which was not exposed to a fluorocarbon but was otherwise handled identically to the other samples, showed a size distribution of between about 180 and 250 nm. The various samples which had been exposed to the six propellant solvents generally fell into two size ranges: those having sizes substantially identical to the control liposome sizes, i.e., between about 150 and 300 microns; and those having predominantly greater sized (400-500 microns or larger). The results, seen in Table 9 below, show that two of three preparations were stable in "Freon 12", that all three were stable in "Freon 114" and "Freon 115", and that MLVs containing largely saturated lipids (formulation 1) are generally more stable in fluorochlorocarbon propellants than those having predominantly unsaturated and/or shorter-chain phospholipids (formulations 2 and 3).
The pelleted and resuspended liposomes were also examined for release of BSA, representative of a relatively large molecular weight marker, and carboxyfluorescein, representative of a relatively small encapsulated marker. For each test, an aliquot of the resuspended liposomes were assayed by conventional methods for the appropriate marker. The marker concentrations are expressed in Table 9 in terms of amount marker per μmole of total lipid in the sample assayed (μg of BSA, μmole of CF). "ND" in the table means "not detectable".
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Freon Formulation 1 Formulation 2 Formulation 3Propellant Size BSA CF Size BSA CF Size BSA CF__________________________________________________________________________Control 191 � 26 14.3 11.4 248 � 84 7.1 3.8 248 � 60 8.2 5.9 11 171 � 35 13.5 12.6 495 � 293 ND ND 560 � 355 ND ND 12 177 � 44 11.4 10.3 231 � 76 8.2 3.2 703 � 400 4.0 1.9 22 1060 � 570 ND ND 475 � 260 5.9 1.8 772 � 430 12.0 1.1113 157 � 43 10.1 8.8 254 � 60 ND ND 160 � 60 ND ND114 188 � 40 11.2 9.3 236 � 65 9.7 3.7 220 � 50 7.8 8.0115 181 � 40 13.2 11.1 188 � 50 8.6 3.2 240 � 55 8.0 5.8__________________________________________________________________________ ND = not detectable
As seen from the data in the table, the loss of encapsulated material correlates generally with increased liposome size, both reflecting instability of liposomes in the particular fluorochlorocarbon solvent. However, both preparations 2 and 3 showed substantial loss of encapsulated material without significant size change when exposed to "Freon 113".
This example examines the therapeutic effect of free and liposome-encapsulated metaproteranol sulfate (elevated dosage levels) on bronchoconstriction induced by aerosols of acetylcholine (ACH).
Two mongrel dogs, a 20 kg male and a 30 kg female, were anesthetized with an initial i.v. bolus injection of sodium thiopental (10 mg/kg body weight) and sodium pentabarbital (20 mg/kg body weight) and subsequent boluses of sodium thiopental every thirty minutes, or as needed, to maintain the dog in an anesthetized state over a four hour test period. The animals were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube, placed on a heat-exchange pad and artificially ventilated by a constant-volume respirator with room air at a frequency of 30 cycles/minute. An esophageal balloon catheter was introduced into the esophagus, connected to one port of a differential pressure transducer, and positioned in the mid-thorax to produce a maximal negative pressure inflection during inspiration. Air flow was monitored by a pneumotachograph connected to the endotracheal tube and the respirator and connected to a differential pressure transducer. Transpulmonary pressure was monitored by a differential pressure transducer, one port connected to a side arm of the tracheal tube and the other end connected to the esophageal balloon catheter. The flow and pressure signals were displayed continuously on an oscilloscope.
Liposome preparations having a lipid composition of DSPC/DSPG/CH/α-T at a molar ratio of 5:1:4:0.1 (Preparation 1) and EPC/EPG/CH/α-T at the same molar ratio (Preparation 2), each encapsulating metaproteranol sulfate at a final 2% drug concentration, were prepared as in Example III. As seen from Table 5 above, Preparation 1 has a drug efflux half life of about 1150 minutes, and Preparation 2, of about 250 minutes. Free MPS was administered as a 2% solution in PBS. Liquid aerosols of acetylcholine solutions sufficient to produce transient bronchoconstriction, as reflected by a 6-10 fold increase in total pulmonary resistance were administered via the endotracheal tube before, and at roughly 15 minute intervals following, aerosol administration of either free or liposome-encapsulated metaproteranol, each in doses corresponding to a total of about 2.4 rags MPS. All aerosols, including the acetylcholine aerosol, free-drug aerosol, and liposome aerosol, were generated with a pneumatic nebulizer (Bird #158, Somerset, Pa.), according to manufacturer's specifications, at 15 psi. Aerosol particle sizing performed with a Mercer Cascade Impactor (InTox Products, NM), indicated mass aerodynamic aerosol particle diameters within 2-6 microns.
The increase in heart rate monitored during the test period is plotted in FIG. 3 for the three drug formulations. The data show that liposomes effectively prevent rapid systemic uptake of the drug and stabilize systemic effects over a several-hour period following drug administration. Liposomes with a greater drug release half-life (solid circles) show a significantly lower heart rate increase than do less stable liposomes (open circles).
The effects of the free-drug and liposome aerosols on bronchoconstriction were measured approximately every fifteen minutes for four hours after initial drug administration. The experiment was repeated 3 times for each free and liposome-encapsulated drug formulation for each animal, and the values averaged. The results obtained for dog #1 are shown in FIG. 4, and are expressed .in terms of percent protection from ACH-induced bronchoconstriction. Each point on the graph represents the mean � standard error of the mean from results obtained in three experiments. As seen from the figure, free drug (open squares), Preparation 1 (closed circles), and Preparation 2 (open circles) all showed substantially the same degree of protection against ACH-induced bronchoconstriction.
This example examines the therapeutic effect of free and liposome-encapsulated terbutaline sulfate and salbutamol (normal dosage levels) on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs.
Male, Hartley guinea pigs, 320-450 gm, were anesthetized by IM injection of xylazine, ketamine, promazine (5:75:0.5 mg/kg animal weight). Respiratory airflow was measured with a whole body flow plethysmograph employing a Validyne DP-45 differential to sense the respiratory-induced pressure drop across a five layer 400 mesh stainless steel screen. Intraesophageal pressure was measured with a Statham P23DC fluid-filled transducer with PE-90 tubing serving as an esophageal cannula. Transducers were coupled via Validyne carrier demodulators to a Buxco Model 6 Pulmonary Mechanics Analyzer which electronically integrates the airflow signal to yield tidal and minute volumes. The analyzer computed total pulmonary resistance, Rin/ex, at points of equal volume, and dynamic compliance, Cdyn, at points of zero air flow, according to published methods (Amdur).
Drug aerosols were administered to the animals by a Pulmosonic Nebulizer inserted between a respirator and a solenoid-operated valve at the tracheal cannula. The respirator was adjusted to produce a stroke volume of 2 ml/100 gm body weight at 60 breaths per minute. Activation of the solenoid valve closes normal breathing path to room air, and opens the path to the nebulizer, affecting controlled aerosol delivery. Bronchodilator aerosols were administered for 2 minutes. Histamine aerosols were administered for 15 secs, producing transient, asthma-like bronchoconstriction.
Terbutaline sulfate was obtained from USP Reference Standard (Rockville, Md.), and formulated as a 0.005% solution in 0.9% saline (free drug) or in a liposomal formulation containing about 5 mg drug per 40 μmole lipid. The liposomes contained egg PC, egg PG, cholesterol, 5:4:1 in phosphate buffered saline, at a final lipid concentration of about 40 μmol total lipid/ml. The liposome preparation was stored at refrigerator temperature as a concentrate and diluted before use. The total amount of drug present in the concentrate was determined by drug extraction from the mixture and spectrophotometric analysis of the extracted drug in the presence of p-nitroaniline solution (6). The liposome concentrate was then diluted with PBS to give a final drug concentration of 0.005% by weight solution.
Salbutamol sulfate was obtained from ACIC Ltd. (Toronto, Canada), and formulated to a concentration of about 0.001% in 0.9% saline (free drug) or in liposomes prepared as above, and containing a final drug concentration of about μg/μmole lipid. The liposomes were stored, diluted, assayed for drug concentration, and diluted to a final drug concentration of about 0.001% by weight, substantially as above.
Histamine diphosphate was obtained from Sigma Chem Co. (St. Louis, Mo.) and dissolved in normal saline to 0.05% by weight.
Terbutaline or salbutamol in free or liposomal form were administered by inhalation, as above, with each animal receiving a total of about 15 μg/g body weight terbutaline or 1.5 μg/g body weight salbutamol in a total inhalation volume of about 2 ml. Liquid aerosols of histamine sufficient to produce transient bronchoconstriction were administered via the endotracheal tube, at 15, 45, 75, and 105 minutes after administration of the bronchodilator. Airflow resistance and compliance values were determined shortly after each histamine treatment. The percent increase in resistance was calculated as the difference between the resistance after histamine administration minus baseline resistance value, divided by baseline value. Similarly, the decrease in lung compliance was calculated as the difference between the compliance after histamine administration minus baseline compliance value, divided by baseline value.
The resistance and compliance values at increasing times after terbutaline administration in free (open squares) and liposomal (crosses) form are shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, respectively. FIGS. 6A and 6B show analogous data for salbutamol drug administration. The data demonstrate the ability of liposomes to enhance protection against bronchoconstriction, at times between about 1-2 hours after drug administration, relative free-drug administration, as discussed above.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein, it will be appreciated that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Nov 15, 1965
|May 30, 1967
|Roy E Shimmin
|Compositions and methods for relieving bronchial congestion
|May 12, 1969
|Jul 20, 1971
|Massachusetts Inst Technology
|Submicron aqueous aerosols containing lecithin
|Jun 11, 1974
|Jan 20, 1976
|May & Baker Limited
|Feb 13, 1978
|Jul 8, 1980
|Robins Ronald K
|Treatment of human viral diseases with 1-B-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide
|Nov 30, 1978
|Nov 4, 1980
|The Welsh National School Of Medicine
|Procedures and pharmaceutical products for use in the administration of antihistamines
|Feb 24, 1978
|Nov 25, 1980
|Papahadjopoulos Demetrios P
|Method of encapsulating biologically active materials in lipid vesicles
|Jan 14, 1981
|Mar 20, 1984
|Hans Georg Weder
|Process and device for producing bilayer vesicles
|Mar 8, 1984
|Aug 26, 1986
|Process for preparing lipid vesicles by vaporisation of solvents
|Nov 14, 1984
|Oct 13, 1987
|Beecham Group P.L.C.
|Arachidonic acid analogues, processes for their preparation and their use in medicine
|Aug 15, 1984
|Mar 7, 1985
|Sterwin Ag
|Herstellung von aerosolzusammensetzungen
|Jan 13, 1983
|Sep 3, 1986
|FISONS plc
|Liposome and sodium cromoglycate compositions, and methods for their preparation
|Title not available
|Sep 17, 1985
|Mar 27, 1986
|Riker Laboratories, Inc.
|A liposomal sustained-release aerosol delivery system
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Sep 14, 1994
|Dec 31, 1996
|Nexstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|Liposome dispersion
|Sep 30, 1997
|Mar 7, 2000
|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy
|Method for producing sterile filterable liposome dispersion
|Jun 3, 2002
|Oct 14, 2003
|Dey, L.P.
|Albuterol and ipratropium inhalation solution, system, kit and method for relieving symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|Dec 27, 2001
|Mar 9, 2004
|Dey, L.P.
|Albuterol inhalation solution, system, kit and method for relieving symptoms of pediatric asthma
|Aug 23, 2000
|Jun 15, 2004
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Formulation for spray-drying large porous particles
|Aug 25, 1999
|Oct 18, 2005
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Stable spray-dried protein formulations
|Mar 7, 2002
|May 30, 2006
|Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
|Particles for inhalation having sustained release properties
|Apr 29, 2002
|Oct 24, 2006
|Sung Michael T
|Lipophilic drug compositions
|Mar 5, 2003
|Nov 21, 2006
|Cleveland State University
|Agglomerated particles for aerosol drug delivery
|Nov 20, 2002
|Feb 27, 2007
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Particulate compositions for pulmonary delivery
|Dec 5, 2006
|Jun 10, 2008
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Particulate compositions for pulmonary delivery
|Mar 3, 2006
|Jun 24, 2008
|Sung Michael T
|Lipophilic drug compositions
|Mar 30, 2001
|Mar 16, 2010
|Alkermes, Inc.
|Particles for inhalation having sustained release properties
|Apr 4, 2003
|Feb 18, 2014
|United Therapeutics Corporation
|Nebulized liposomes for the pulmonary application of drug compounds
|Apr 29, 2002
|Jun 12, 2003
|Sung Michael T.
|Lipophilic drug compositions
|Nov 20, 2002
|Jul 10, 2003
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Particulate compositions for pulmonary delivery
|Nov 20, 2002
|Jul 10, 2003
|Advanced Inhalation Research Inc.
|Particulate compositions for improving solubility of poorly soluble agents
|Oct 18, 2002
|Jul 31, 2003
|Dey L.P.
|Albuterol inhalation soultion, system, kit and method for relieving symptoms of pediatric asthma
|Mar 5, 2003
|Oct 9, 2003
|Annanth Annapragada
|Agglomerated particles for aerosol drug delivery
|Apr 15, 2003
|Oct 9, 2003
|Imtiaz Chaudry
|Albuterol and ipratropium inhalation solution, system, kit and method for relieving symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|Apr 15, 2003
|Oct 30, 2003
|Imtiaz Chaudry
|Albuterol and ipratropium inhalation solution, system, kit and method for relieving symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|Mar 5, 2003
|Dec 4, 2003
|Transave, Inc.
|Methods for entrapment of bioactive agent in a liposome or lipid complex
|Mar 5, 2003
|Jan 15, 2004
|Transave, Inc.
|Inhalation system for prevention and treatment of intracellular infections
|Apr 28, 2003
|Jan 29, 2004
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Modulation of release from dry powder formulations
|Apr 28, 2003
|Jan 6, 2005
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Modulation of release from dry powder formulations
|May 27, 2004
|Feb 3, 2005
|Wong Frances M.P.
|Method of pulmonary administration of an agent
|Apr 4, 2003
|Jan 5, 2006
|Thomas Schmehl
|Atomizable liposomes and their use for the pulmonary administration of active substances
|Jul 7, 2005
|Jan 5, 2006
|Edwards David A
|Stable spray-dried protein formulations
|Dec 5, 2006
|May 10, 2007
|Batycky Richard P
|Particulate compositions for pulmonary delivery
|Oct 22, 2007
|Jun 12, 2008
|Aradigm Corporation
|Processes for taste-masking of inhaled formulations
|Sep 24, 2007
|Sep 18, 2008
|Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
|Particles for inhalation having rapid release properties
|Jan 7, 2011
|May 5, 2011
|Aradigm Corporation
|Processes for taste-masking of inhaled formulations
|Nov 9, 1998
|May 20, 1999
|Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|Emulsions for aerosolization and drug delivery
|Sep 22, 2006
|Apr 5, 2007
|Jamie Collins Doss
|Therapeutic soap product with uv protection
|Sep 22, 2006
|Nov 15, 2007
|Jamie Collins Doss
|Therapeutic soap product with uv protection
|U.S. Classification
|424/450, 514/930, 514/826, 514/958, 424/45
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Feb 9, 1998
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 31, 2002
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 20, 2006
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 12


text:
The Lebermuth Company is proud of its partnership with Teas Etc who was recently awarded 1st Place in the 2010 North American Tea Championship (NATC) in the Flavored White Tea Category. Lebermuth's Tim Nemeth and Teas Etc's Beth Johnston have worked closely over the past several months creating a variety of cutting edge tea flavors. The 1st Place winner is an example of the culmination of their work.
The NATC, formerly World Tea Championship, is an independent competition judged by professional tea cuppers distinguishing the highest quality, best tasting teas commercially available in the North American marketplace.
NATC conducts and evaluates teas three times each calendar year and holds its invitation only award ceremony each June. The ceremony is held in conjunction with World Tea Expo, the tea industries premiere education and tradeshow event held in Las Vegas, Nevada.
"We are excited by the results of this year's NATC entries" said Beth Johnston, Founder and CEO of Teas Etc. "We made a decision to focus our entries on the newly developed flavored blends we have been working on. Based on the judges evaluations the hard work of both Lebermuth and Teas Etc has paid off" Johnston continues.
As the only female owned company to have won World Tea Championship, now NATC, the Teas Etc brand has become synonymous with quality. "Bringing the flavoring component of our business in-house was part of our strategic plan and an extension of our commitment to quality. Quality is not just about the tea, it includes flavors. The Lebermuth Company was the quality driven collaborator we were looking for. Tim has done a great job interpreting my requests. Working with him and the entire Lebermuth team has been a pleasure."
"I was totally taken by surprise" recalls Nemeth when he learned about the win. "Beth called Rob (Brown) as soon as she found out they had won and expressed that she wanted to give me the news herself. She was very excited!"
The Lebermuth Company develops new flavors for a variety of applications. "When I formulate each flavor I think about the end use product and what our clients envision. I have a passion for using creative "twists" to enhance and customize flavors giving our clients an edge in the marketplace. The most exciting part about winning the competition is getting Lebermuth and Teas Etc recognition for a quality product. It is rewarding when customers have success with our products." Nemeth states.
« Back
Sign up for news and updates fromThe Lebermuth Company.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Recent Meetups
Feb 15, 2016 · 9:30 AMFamily Day Extravaganza
Tickets now on sale! Head to familydaymississauga.com to purchase. Mississauga Kids is excited to host Family Day Events at the Mississauga Family Day Extravaganza! Join... Learn more
Oct 11, 2014 · 2:30 PMHappy Eid
***** NEW TIME******the fun side indoor playground for all ages. We are located next door to ISNA in Mississauga. 2222 south Sheridan way. We will be opened Saturday... Learn more
Aug 15, 2014 · 10:00 AMMeeting new people
Looking to meet new people in Mississauga. We will be meeting this Friday at thefunside. We will have free coffee for the moms and kids will have fun playing. Free for... Learn more
Mar 7, 2014 · 10:00 AMPD day
Indoor playground for all ages drop -in & play $8.00 per child. Take a look inside https://vimeo.com/50693813
Jun 21, 2013 · 4:00 PMDrop-In Free Summer Craft - Academy for Mathematics & Science (Port Credit)
FRIDAY JUNE 21st 4:00-7:00 pm Yay, it's Summer! Drop by with the kids so they can make their own handmade Summer Themed Art Journal & Pencil Topper. All materials are... Learn more
- See all past Meetups


text: The ambience, the service, and the food are all excellent in this restaurant, if a tiny bit pretentious, especially for a place like Cannon Beach. We don't take dress-up clothes when we go there, and I did feel a bit sloppy in my sweater and jeans, but no one seemed to notice. Very good food, good wine list, lovely service--I... More


text:
The Best Southeastern Outfitters: Mt. Rogers Outfitters, Damascus, Virginia
I'm a backpacker and gearhead who's moving to Charlottesville, Virginia. What are the best outfitters for me in the Southeast?
Nov 13, 2012Nov 13, 2012
Mt. Rogers Outfitters becomes the center of the backpacker universe for a single day each year, during the annual Trail Days festival that's held every May in Damascus. The town is a popular stopover for Appalachian Trail thru-hikers, and nearly every one of them makes the pilgrimage to this humble shop to load up on equipment and fuel. Mt. Rogers Outfitters also runs a hostel, and operates a shuttle service for bikers and hikers to the Virginia Creeper Trail and the nearby wilderness.
Filed To: Adventure Adviser


text:
5 posts tagged with washington and tax.
Displaying 1 through 5 of 5. Subscribe:
For the past 5+ years I've owed small amounts of Federal income tax, $5-$11. Why not this year? [more inside]
Appealing a Property Tax Assessment - need advice in King County WA
Property Tax filter: In August I bought a house in King County WA. The county's assessment of the property is very high. I would like to appeal for a review of the assessment. The desired result is a lower tax bill. I would be grateful for any strategy or advice. [more inside]
Do I really need to pay WI state tax?
If I interned for 3 months in Seattle but live and go to school in Wisconsin, do I need to pay WI state tax on the money I made over the summer in Washington, which has no state tax? [more inside]
Know any good tax lawyers?
Can you recommend a tax attorney in Washington State? Business taxes (Department of Revenue), specifically - but any tax attorney you've had good experience with would be appreciated!
Should I buy a new car in Washington or Oregon?
I'm thinking about buying a new car in the next year. I live in Seattle, Washington, where the sales tax is about 8.8%, but I visit Oregon frequently, where there is no sales tax. Would there be any drawbacks to buying the car in Oregon to avoid the sales tax? I would still register and insure it in Washington.
Page: 1


text:
iHerb カスタマーレビュー
のセーブ: ¥430 (43 % オフ)
Reviewer1868258により Nov 20, 2010 に掲載
I don't know, I felt weird after the first pill, I never took another one...
Just normal but better than Thompsons brand
Reviewer2141013により Mar 14, 2011 に掲載
I still can't sleep, but this product helps in making my eyes heavy and sleepy, but doesn't make me stay sleep if i do. I still sleep lightly or not at all, and this product didn't help me. Time to find another product.
Not as good as normal Melatonin
Reviewer2865196により Dec 20, 2011 に掲載
I tried this a few times and I seemed to sleep better w/ regular melatonin. I don't need this regularly to sleep, just in times of higher stress. I'll keep trying it though.
Good product, but not very effective in falling asleep fast
Reviewer1894294により Apr 29, 2012 に掲載
This is an ok product, but it does not really help you to fall asleep fast. But if you do fall asleep, this keeps you sleeping all night without interruptions... I think this is because it is a time release -product, so it releases the melatonin slowly through many hours.
Too slow release
5148586956047890508により Jul 18, 2013 に掲載
Product is OK but 8-hour release period is too long and can leave you drowsy in the morning. Suggest 6-hour release melatonin of equal or slightly higher dose for those who just can't afford to sleep 8 hours every night.
Não funcionou como outras marcas
BrasilCliqueAquiにより Nov 25, 2013 に掲載
Infelizmente não funcionou bem comigo como outras marcas. Não me ajudou a dormir e me deixou com sono pela manhã.
5537142672956661769により Apr 22, 2014 に掲載
Good value
SavoringLifeにより Sep 17, 2014 に掲載
Take for a good night's sleep.
4734468629217501754により Dec 29, 2014 に掲載
Lo esperado
5425312318517541751により Apr 03, 2015 に掲載
Producto tal como se esperaba. El porte tardó más de la cuenta, pero bien.


text:
Buy Newest cheap nike free run 2 black Get More Green Back. Welcome to our Luxury Items Outlet to choose your nike free run 2 black sale,UP 70% OFF With Free Shipping.
D] t249 $@ 6Dc$@F D 3@I 92D 2 32C 4@56 E@ D42.
Then, if you like our site and need full access, we'll require you to buy an affordable subscription.
You can return right after your 25 period for an additional 10 free articles, have the option to invest in a subscription and continue to enjoy valuable local information and facts.
If you'd like help, please contact our office at (828) 322 4510.
You have viewed (%remaining%) of your respective 10 free pages in Four weeks.
nike free run 2 black , Payments will be automatically deducted out of your checking, credit or debit card account with the Herald Journal's EZ Pay system.
I feel I'm sure why President Monson is attempting to outlive President Packer.
5 x 9@A6 H6 86E E96C6 D@652Jk^Am kAmp D@ E96C6 2C6 D6G6C2 G6CJ 2.
357 Debbie Andrew Outside Sales Ext.
Link Horse with no Name posted at 8:01 pm on Sun, Jan 19, 2014.
nike free run 2 black
Wholesale the newest nike free run 2 black,Aug 13, 2014 ad id: 10452258 The Snowmass Club wants interested candidates for any summer inside the.
Police IRegular, Full time$.
Experienced Maintenance Steady,.
Jul 4, 2014 ad id: 10347621 The Aspen Art Museum is now hiring this particular positions:Security and.
Aug 8, 2014 ad id: 10451402 Electricians R&A Enterprises Now hiring Experienced Apprentice,.
nike free run 2 black
nike free run 2 black Your very own important guidelines to help you denotes quite a bit a person like me and substantially more to my peers.
This is the very first time that I frequented your online page and then to now.
Aug 13, 2014 ad id: 10465017 Old Snowmass $995,000 Serenity in Old Snowmass Sunny and uniquely designed.
I amazed with all the analysis you have made to produce this particular set up extraordinary.
II#3D(tG8WFX(I8s8 @lcm(`GkcsX)n_q^Ku.
nike shoes cheap australia
free runs nike
cheap nike clothing australia
nike free flyknit review
nike free 5.0 v4
nike free 4.0 v3 womens


text:
Children's Health Month: Now That I'm a Mom
By Jessica Orquina
This is my first Children's Health Month as a mother. Last October, I wrote about how my concerns and habits had changed as an expectant mother. Now, my son is almost one year old and I'm still learning how to best protect his health, and our planet.
Since the baby arrived, my husband and I have been making sure our house is clean and dust-free to help him breath better. And, I made sure that the toys I buy are safe and kept clean.
Recently, my son started scooting around and becoming curious about everything he can get his hands on. So, I've been baby proofing our apartment. We use safer cleaning products, like those with the Design for the Environment (DfE) label, but I still make sure they are all out of reach of small hands. I've stored them all up and out of reach and put locks on the cabinet doors.
It's important to remember, children are not little adults. They are more vulnerable to environmental exposures because their systems are still developing, they often play on the floor or ground, and they like to put things in their mouths. As parents we need to remember to keep their environments safe and protect them.
Here are some tips to protect your kids from environmental health risks.
About the author: Jessica Orquina works in the Office of Public Affairs as the social media lead for the agency. Prior to joining EPA, she served military and commercial airline pilot. She lives in Washington, DC with her husband and son.


text:
The Style Gallery is a great new way for you to view, love, and share outfit photos. It's meant to showcase all the expressive, creative, and inspirational personalities of our community!
Image: The Sister Project
What do Dorothy, age 25, Beth, age 22, and Hildegarde, age 27, all have in common? Besides possessing "natural charm" and the ability to "dress well, talk well, and dance well," it is, quite simply, the fact that they are single.
This 1930's advertisement, which reads, "Isn't it natural for every girl to want popularity, romance, and a devoted husband?" seems to suggest that, for a woman in her twenties to want anything else is to have something terribly wrong with her. Being single for so long – at the age of 27, Hildegarde over there looks practically ancient – should be a young woman's deepest fear. Luckily, however, these three ladies don't need to be afraid of remaining alone forever. All they need is a little Lux detergent, and perhaps some help from some highly informative dating guides…
Image: Sad and Useless
In this first set of images, circa 1936, we can learn what not to do on a date from this young lady's mistakes, with winning advice like: "Don't talk about clothes or try to describe your new gown to a man. Please and flatter your date by talking about the things he wants to talk about." (See more tips for single ladies here.)
This next dating guide is much more recent, and chock full of useful information! If you don't want to watch this clip, here is a list of important takeaways:
Has anything changed since the 1930s? Or the 1980s? Do you think remaining single – by choice or otherwise – is more acceptable in today's society? Do you think the dating advice offered by these guides is effective or insulting?
Insulting, naturally.
I maintain that my boyfriend and I work so well together because we both enjoyed being single.
I can only think of one couple I know that got together because one of them went out of their way to do something to "catch a hot one" – and it was a man who was doing the looking.
Ugh…let's not forget "The Rules," published in 1995, with gems like "let him take the lead" and "don't stare or talk too much."
But Jen, didn't you notice that men *deserve* our attention? Silly feminist.
I think the message has morphed in interesting ways in recent years. Take Beyonce's "Single Ladies." In this case, women are being told it's a form of empowerment to reject anyone who won't marry you (specifically through a display of consumerism–a pretty common theme in Beyonce's ouvre, really, going back to "Bills, Bills, Bills")…but that's still the ultimate fulfillment…
Love the blog, ladies!
Effective? Perhaps. It might land you a man but he'll be a pig. Why would you want one of those?
Angel: I love it! Consumerism indeed… if the man isn't willing to pay for everything, well then… ; )
There are similar guides for men: one called "How to Make Love" (i.e. "pitch woo," not the contemporary sense) recommends that men "press on" when a woman is resisting him with an answer of "no," and if she screams, he should abandon his hope, because nobody wants to be with "that kind of girl."
Sure things have changed. We now have the agency to proudly say "no, I don't have a husband/boyfriend/sig.other" but I would argue that the expectation to pick up a stray, one day, is still there.
I think women should take full advantage of this statistic on men being shy. Too often we assume that with gender comes power and maybe this isn't the case. Maybe we're stunting our social growth when we say we're too meek or shy or "not ballsy enough" (ha!) to approach a man.
There are so many intelligent responses to these ads and all I can think of is
I just had to comment–that dating video from the 80's looked like an SNL mock-up. I also like how the first ad subtly says that these three girls have super-stinky pits and it took them 5 paragraphs to get us to that icky conclusion without directly saying it.
you should see some of those old 70's commercials for tampons or douches – they legally *couldn't* say what their product did, and the end result is so vauge it's hilarious.
I don't find it insulting. I don't think the writing is disrespectful to women when taken in context. It was a different time.
Instead of getting bent out of shape at the way our culture was 70 years ago, why don't we focus on the here and now. I'm a modern housewife – I cook, bake, clean, garden and attend university in the spring and fall, and I am ridiculously happy with a husband who adores and respects me. I've chosen a more traditional life style and I think it would be anti-feminist for me to be ridiculed.
yes, yes, and yes to much of what was said, but I wouldn't talk about a stuffed animal with my date… I already look five years old half the time, I don't need to act like it too.
Thanks for publishing these hilarious, but sad advertisements.
These images present two interesting revelations: (1)how cruel – and laughably obvious, today – advertising was in the past. Women who "smell" or who in any way deviate from "normal" are shunned and unhappy – and worst of all – may not catch a man!
AND, more sad and worrisome, how many of these ideas are still played out today, but in a much slicker and subtle format.
Maybe this is why I've never had a boyfriend… oh wait, that's 'cause I'm a lesbian.
Good grief, grow up. People really *did* get married that young all the time when this was written. I highly doubt it was written to offend women decades later when the marriage age had jumped ten years.
Outrageous sexism!
Name (required)
Email (will not be published) (required)
© 2017 ModCloth, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


text:
Gaby Hoffmann
Gabriella Mary Hoffmann was born in New York City, New York, to actors Anthony Herrera and Viva (née Janet Susan Mary Hoffmann), who was a Warhol superstar. Her ancestry includes German, Irish, English, Puerto Rican, Spanish, and 1/16th Italian (Sicilian). She began acting in commercials at 4 to help pay the family bills but got tired of the work ... See full bio »


text:
Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules are used for:
Treating overactive bladder with symptoms such as urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency.
Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules are an antispasmodic and antimuscarinic agent. It works by reducing muscle tone of the bladder, which decreases urinary spasm and frequency.
Do NOT use Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules if:
- you are allergic to any ingredient in Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules
- you have delayed or slow emptying of the stomach or uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma
- you have severe kidney problems or trouble urinati
Before using Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules:
Some medical conditions may interact with Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules. Tell your doctor or pharmacist if you have any medical conditions, especially if any of the following apply to you:
- if you are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or are breast-feeding
- if you are taking any prescription or nonprescription medicine, herbal preparation, or dietary supplement
- if you have allergies to medicines, foods, or other substances
- if you use alcohol or have a history of alcohol abuse
- if you have kidney problems or a blockage of your bladder or bowel
- if you have liver problems, stomach or bowel problems (eg, inflammation, constipation), myasthenia gravis, increased pressure in the eye, or glaucoma
Some MEDICINES MAY INTERACT with Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules. Tell your health care provider if you are taking any other medicines, especially any of the following:
- Oral solid dosage forms of potassium chloride because the risk of stomach or bowel irritation may be increased
- Phenothiazines (eg, thioridazine) because their effectiveness may be decreased by Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules
How to use Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules:
Use Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules as directed by your doctor. Check the label on the medicine for exact dosing instructions.
- An extra patient leaflet is available with Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules. Talk to your pharmacist if you have questions about this information.
- Take Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules by mouth with water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before eating, preferably in the morning or as directed by your doctor.
- If you miss a dose of Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules, take it as soon as possible. If it is almost time for your next dose, skip the missed dose and go back to your regular dosing schedule. Do not take 2 doses at once.
Important safety information:
- Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules may cause drowsiness or blurred vision. These effects may be worse if you take it with alcohol or certain medicines. Use Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules with caution. Do not drive or perform other possibly unsafe tasks until you know how you react to it.
- Do not drink alcohol within 2 hours before or after you take Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules.
- Do not use medicines that may cause drowsiness (eg, sleep aids, muscle relaxers) while you are using Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules; it may add to their effects. Ask your pharmacist if you have questions about which medicines may cause drowsiness.
- Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules may cause dry mouth. To relieve dry mouth, suck on sugarless hard candy or ice chips, chew sugarless gum, drink water, or use a saliva substitute.
- Do not become overheated in hot weather or while you are being active; heatstroke may occur.
- Tell your doctor or dentist that you take Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules before you receive any medical or dental care, emergency care, or surgery.
- Use Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules with caution in the ELDERLY; they may be more sensitive to its effects, especially dry mouth, constipation, stomach pain or upset, and trouble urinating.
- Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules should be used with extreme caution in CHILDREN; safety and effectiveness in children have not been confirmed.
- PREGNANCY and BREAST-FEEDING: If you become pregnant, contact your doctor. You will need to discuss the benefits and risks of using Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules while you are pregnant. It is not known if Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules are found in breast milk. If you are or will be breast-feeding while you use Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules, check with your doctor. Discuss any possible risks to your baby.
Possible side effects of Sanctura XR Extended-Release Capsules:
All medicines may cause side effects, but many people have no, or minor, side effects. Check with your doctor if any of these most COMMON side effects persist or become bothersome:
Seek medical attention right away if any of these SEVERE side effects occur:
Constipation; dry mouth or eyes; gas; nasal dryness; nausea; upset stomach.
Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue); chest pain; dark urine; difficulty urinating; fainting; fast or irregular heartbeat; hallucinations; mental or mood changes; muscle pain or weakness; red, swollen, peeling, or blistered skin; vision changes.