text:
10 Cheapest Beers in the NFL
PORTLAND, Ore. (TheStreet) -- As an unwritten rule, National Football league teams don't generally do their fans any favors.
As we've mentioned, the NFL has no problem taking billions in tax dollars for its play palaces, hoarding all the money from deals to broadcast games from those gilded facilities, blacking out those broadcasts in home markets when fans don't give them a full stadium to show to the rest of of the country, hiding behind tax-exempt status to avoid financial responsibility for any of it and using an antitrust agreement to justify all of the above.
That being the case, it pays to throw the disgruntled local fan base a concession every so often. The Jacksonville Jaguars haven't blacked out a game on local television in three years, but the experience left the small-market team's front office so chastened that it's giving away free beer with tickets this year just to avoid the possibility.
It's one of the few ways the league has tried to dislodge fans from their warm lairs filled with high-definition screens, cheap and plentiful snacks and beverages and DirecTV's
That's before you factor in the cost of taking a family of four to the game and, you know, introducing a future generation of potential customers to a live-game experience. The average cost to take a family of four to a game, park, have a beer, hot dog and soda and go home with a program and a cap also jumped 3.7%, to nearly $460.
But the kids don't seem to be the NFL's main targets. If you're over 21, the NFL and its official beer sponsors at Anheuser-Busch InBev
That's still $7 for little more than a pint, but it's one of the few concessions the league is making at its concessions stands for fans feeling otherwise squeezed by ticket prices. While there are still plenty of teams that charge well above that average beer price, there are still some relative deals to be found in the depths of taxpayer-funded NFL stadiums.
In Ohio, fans of the Cleveland Browns and Cincinnati Bengals still enjoy $5, 12-ounce beers for 42 cents an ounce, although that's costly compared with the 35 cents per ounce paid by folks watching the Miami Dolphins (20 ounces for $7) and New Orleans Saints (24 ounces for $8.50). The Carolina Panthers have easily the lowest per-ounce price in the league at 27 cents per ounce (22 ounces for $6), but the biggest surprise may be in New England. Despite having the league's highest average ticket price at $118 and making the AFC Conference Championship last year, the 38 cents per ounce the team charges for beer ($7.50 for 20 ounces) is the lowest of any team that made the playoffs last year.
With help from Team Marketing Reports Fan Cost Index, we found the 10 lowest beer prices in the league and the teams that aren't soaking their beer-loving fans:


text:
Topic: how do i update and edit a page?! (obvious newb :P)
hello everyone, i'm new to the community. I hope i can get some help here.
My friend hired a web developer a few months ago to make him a website, and he used rails to do it. Now he no longer wants to work with him, and wants me to take over. I am an experienced web developer, only i have never used rails as a framework before. I took a few tutorial courses and eventually realized it was a nifty structure for dynamic database implementation. Any-who... the structure of all the directories were the most confusing part, but i eventually realized that the views tie into the layout... so now that i have that basic understanding... i can edit pages and what not. But here's the problem, i edited a page called home.html.erb in the view/pages directory of the web app, but the changes are not appearing on the site... so is there some kind of command i have to run to update the changes i have made to get them to show up on the site? any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you

subset: commoncrawl


text:
JR Mooney Galleries of Fine Art
J.R. Mooney Galleries of Fine Art was founded in San Antonio, Texas, in 1947 by Joe and Adelle Mooney. Both Joe and Adelle are native Texans. Robert Mooney joined the staff in 1964 and has developed additional locations as well as new artists and marketing for the galleries. The first forays into the art business came when picture framing and artist materials were added to a wide variety of merchandise. J.R. Mooney Galleries has provided framing and representation for many of the notable Texas artists such as G. Harvey, W. A. Slaughter, Dalhart Windberg, And Jose Vives-Atsara. Additionally, J.R. Mooney Galleries has provided framing services for every American President since John Kennedy and every Texas Governor since John Connally. The galleries have also supplied the Vatican, the Royal Palace in Madrid, Queen Beatrix of Holland, as well as major collections and collectors in Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia.
One of the company's most famous early clients was Porfirio Salinas. Salinas, whose artwork was owned by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, was a client of the gallery and was represented by the gallery until the time of his death in 1973.
All twenty three major artworks displayed in the 1991 - 1992 G. Harvey exhibition at the Smithsonian Institute titled "The All American Horse" were framed by J.R Mooney Galleries.


text:
Animal Facts
Scientific Name
Macrocystis pyrifera
Animal Type
photosynthesis converts the energy of light to the energy of carbohydrate molecules
in general to 100 feet (30 m); 175 feet (53 m) possible in ideal conditions
sea palms, bull kelp; family: Lessoniaceae
along the coast from Santa Cruz to Turtle Bay, Mexico and along the temperate coasts of South America, New Zealand, and Australia
Natural History
This majestic giant of the kelp forest grows faster than tropical bamboo—about three to five inches each day in our exhibit and 10 to 12 inches in the bay. Under ideal conditions, giant kelp can grow an astonishing two feet each day.
Held upright by gas-filled bladders at the base of leaflike blades, kelp fronds grow straight up to the surface, where they spread across the top of the water to form a dense canopy. Giant kelp often grows in turbulent water, which brings renewed supplies of nutrients, allowing the plants to grow to a possible height of 175 feet. The stemlike stipes are tough but flexible, allowing the kelp to sway in ocean currents. Unlike a proper root system, the holdfast—a coneshaped mass of branching extensions called haptera—doesn't carry nutrients or water; it anchors the kelp to a rock.
During a population surge, sea urchins—which normally eat pieces of kelp that fall to the seafloor—will feed on the stipes of giant kelp plants and can completely destroy a kelp bed. Otters, voracious eaters, have helped preserve kelp forests by feeding on urchins.
Kelp is harvested for use in aquaculture. Studies seem to show little, if any, negative affects from harvesting. Kelp could be seen as a renewable resource.
Sludge, silt or sewage dumped near kelp forests can cover and destroy the microscopic stage of giant kelp.
Cool Facts
Giant kelp is harvested as a source of algin, an emulsifying and binding agent used in the production of many foods and cosmetics, like ice cream, toothpaste and cereals.
Pieces of decomposing kelp (detritus) sink to the depths of the ocean, providing food for deep sea creatures.
Giant kelp has a multitude of inhabitants. Invertebrates graze on the blades, fish seek shelter in the fronds and thousands of invertebrates live in the holdfast—such as brittle stars, sea stars, anemones, sponges and tunicates. Sea otters like to hang out in the kelp forest, where they find their favorite food and can wrap up in a kelp frond to keep from drifting away at naptime.
As kelp grows, a blade at the tip of each frond separates, producing a series of tiny new blades. The logo of the Monterey Bay Aquarium represents the tip of a growing kelp plant.


text:
Backgrounder #2346 on Public Diplomacy
December 8, 2009
December 8, 2009 | Backgrounder on Public Diplomacy
Abstract: Can Facebook and Twitter change the world? Can all the nifty new social-networking sites promote democracy and a better understanding of American values around the world? The potential is certainly there -- as was seen in the invaluable Twitter updates during the post-election protests in Iran. The U.S. government is embracing Web 2.0 for an ambitious strategy of reaching previously untapped populations around the world -- call it Public Diplomacy 2.0. While the potential progress is undeniable, so is the potential danger. Public diplomacy expert Helle Dale explains the recent developments, strategies, benefits, and risks of cyber diplomacy.
Public diplomacy and strategic communications experts within the U.S. government are exploring the potential of the new social media in the effort to win hearts and minds abroad, especially in the Muslim world where today's war of ideas is being fought. Enemies of the United States are already expert in using these low-cost outreach tools that can connect thousands, potentially even millions, at the touch of a computer key or cell phone button. As public affairs blogger Matt Armstrong writes,
In this age of mass information and precision guided media, everyone from political candidates to terrorists must instantly and continuously interact with and influence audiences in order to be relevant and competitive. Ignoring the utility of social media is tantamount to surrendering the high ground in the enduring battle to influence minds around the world.[1]
There is, however, no doubt that a matchup between the federal government and the new media will require strategic thinking, training, and critical analysis in order to function optimally. Where the U.S. government is rather stodgy and often far behind the private sector in employing technological innovation, the new social media is cutting edge, nimble, constantly changing, and interactive on a personal level. "It doesn't make sense to be using Web 2.0 tools for the sake of using Web 2.0 tools," Sheila Campbell, co-chair of the Federal Web Managers Council, told the National Journal in February. In other words, many federal agencies have yet to demonstrate the ability to create videos or Web sites that attract and maintain the interest of the public.[2]
In the absence of a National Communications Strategy and in the absence of capacity to measure the impact of various communications platforms, the new media's effectiveness for public diplomacy and strategic communications purposes will remain limited. The potential for reaching large audiences is certainly there, but there are many gaps in the understanding of the nature of Public Diplomacy 2.0 that have to be addressed before the new social media can become a primary vehicle with which the U.S. government addresses world audiences (in addition to more traditional means, such as shortwave and FM radio, television, libraries, or student exchange programs).
The History of Internet Diplomacy
The trend toward new media outreach within the U.S. government began in the early 1990s, when the Internet quickly became an everyday tool in businesses and homes. In the past few years, online social media have also become accessible worldwide. Facebook, for instance, was until recently merely a social-networking site for high school and college students, launching its debut in 2004. It was a tool for teenagers to connect beyond the reach of parental supervision. Now, however, Facebook has become a means of easy mass communication around the globe, used by teens and adults, government, ordinary citizens, and businesses alike.
The Obama Administration came into office with a keen sense of the potential of the new media, having run the most tech-savvy campaign in American history. In fact, new media outreach is today the main thrust of the public diplomacy innovations of the State Department under Judith McHale, the new Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy. Yet, in part because of the newness of this policy thrust in public diplomacy (which essentially dates back to President Obama's Cairo speech to Arab audiences this past June accompanied bythe U.S. government's electronic mass distribution of his speech, and coinciding with McHale's taking office), and in part because of the diffuseness of new media outreach within various government agencies, there is little data to quantify and analyze the U.S. government's new media effectiveness and impact.
Discussions of the State Department's need to embrace emerging technology, specifically harnessing the Internet's remarkable capacity for effective public engagement, go back little more than a decade. Early steps were taken by Joseph Duffey, director of the United States Information Agency (USIA) under President Bill Clinton: To save money, Duffey moved certain USIA activities to computer platforms, closing down some of the agency's costlier print publications. Change, however, began in earnest in the year 2000, following the absorption of USIA by the State Department, where USIA's cultural and exchange programs became the International Information Programs (IIP) and its public diplomacy officers became staff for the State Department area desks and worked in the field in U.S. embassies.
In 2000, Ira Magaziner, President Clinton's "Internet czar" briefed State Department officials on the need for the United States to become more engaged in public diplomacy. As the Internet was quickly becoming more deeply integrated into everyday life, he argued that the average person could now be linked to near-unlimited amounts of information, necessitating greater openness and engagement on the part of government.
Senator George Allen, chairman of the Republican High Tech Task Force, echoed similar ideas at the 2001 NetDiplomacy conference, referring to the Internet as "a modern day version of Gutenberg's printing press," advocating its use to "disperse our ideas," spreading democratic ideals within previously inaccessible societies worldwide, "[hopefully] leading to greater liberties."[3]
Though the need for U.S. diplomatic engagement on the Internet was widely understood, in 2000 and 2001, the questions of what should be posted online and how best to accomplish American diplomatic objectives remained a subject of debate. As Richard Solomon of the U.S. Institute of Peace stated in 2000, "the opportunity is there for State to put out American perspectives on almost any issue, for anybody to pick up, the question is: What should the government be putting out?"[4] It is fair to say that this question is still being debated.
The annual report of the Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy in 2004 recommended that State "actively look for ways to use emerging software developments to expand...broadcast reach over the internet," but budget requests as late as 2006, which sought to increase funding for public diplomacy, still did not include funding for newer technologies, preferring instead more traditional tools such as radio.[5]
It was not until 2006 that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice declared her intention to "set up 'virtual posts,' where people can visit a Web site and chat online with U.S. diplomats."[6] According to Colleen Graffy, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy under President George W. Bush, the first State Department blog entry was posted by senior legal adviser John Bellinger III in a guest appearance on the Opinio Juris blog[7] in January 2007. This was followed nine months later when the State Department officially joined the blogosphere with its own blog, Dipnote, on public diplomacy.[8]
The arrival of America.gov, the U.S. government's chief public diplomacy portal, launched by the State Department's Bureau of International Information Programs in January 2007, was much hailed by American diplomats. America.gov provides features on American life as well as the doings of the President and Secretary of State and serves as a platform for a whole host of interactive media -- Webcasts, blogs, videos, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and even Second Life, a 3-D virtual world where users can socialize with free voice and text chat. One of the State Department's latest new media ventures is Co.Nx, a Web conferencing program that connects U.S. experts in a variety of fields with foreign audiences as well as U.S. embassies.[9]
The Obama Approach
In its first months in office, the Obama Administration indicated its commitment to using 21st-century technology in various forms as an integral component of public diplomacy. Similar to strategies employed in last year's U.S. presidential campaign, a wide variety of social networking and communication mediums have been under consideration to maximize the exposure and resonance of U.S. outreach. On his first day in office, President Obama signed a memorandum of "Transparency and Open Government,"[10] which stated that the Web 2.0 technologies are necessary to "tap into the vast amounts of knowledge...in communities across the country."[11] It became clear very soon that the Administration aspired to tap into the knowledge from communities around the world as well.
As part of the effort to make the U.S. brand more marketable and accessible to foreign populations, President Obama appointed Judith McHale, former president and CEO of Discovery Communications, as Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. The selection of McHale -- who molded Discovery into a global giant with 1.4 billion subscribers in 170 countries and 35 different languages -- speaks volumes about the shape that President Obama envisions for public diplomacy.[12]
When asked about what made Discovery so effective in the global market, McHale stressed the need for understanding target audiences and conveying information in user-friendly ways. During her May 13, 2009, confirmation hearing McHale stated:
New technology, used effectively and creatively, can be a game changer. Communications advances provide unprecedented opportunities to engage people directly, to connect them to one another, and to dramatically scale up main traditional public diplomacy efforts. They provide the opportunity to move from an old paradigm, in which our government speaks as one to many, to a new model of engaging interactively and collaboratively across lines that might otherwise divide us from people around the world. We must create an institutional framework that can take full advantage of new media, with an understanding that these new tools must be carefully tailored to particular circumstances and always used in the service of a larger strategy.[13]
The most important example of President Obama's commitment to technology as a vital mechanism of public diplomacy and to McHale's initiative was the mass distribution of the President's speech in Cairo. In an effort to disseminate President Obama's call for improved U.S.-Arab relations to as large an audience as possible, U.S. government agencies used a variety of Internet applications, including social-networking sites, podcasts, and a live Webcast on the White House's Web site. Text-message and Twitter updates reached more than 20,000 users worldwide.[14]
The focus of this particular service, funded by the State Department, was on the citizens of nations abroad -- the text messages were unavailable to U.S. citizens, as in principle are all the products of U.S. public diplomacy, because of the restrictions on disseminating propaganda toU.S. citizens embodied in the Smith-Mundt Act. The text messages were available in Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, and eight other languages, reaching people in more than 200 countries.[15] Translated versions of the speech in both text and video were available on YouTube, Facebook, and MySpace, as well as the popular South Asia networking site Orkut.[16]
The White House also started an international discussion on Facebook, which has over 20 million Arab users, and responses to the speech submitted via text messages were compiled and posted on America.gov.
Similarly, President Obama's speech in Ghana last July was, according to McHale, "a model of creative public diplomacy for the 21st century. I believe that it is embodied in what Secretary Clinton calls 'smart power.' The centerpiece was a creative White House initiative that bridged new media and old."[17] The White House Office of New Media strategy included a texting service throughout Africa and invited people to ask questions of the President in English or French. Nearly 16,000 people from 87 countries did so. The U.S. embassy in South Africa collaborated with a mobile-based social network and received another 200,000 questions from throughout Africa.
New Media and Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Iran
All this flurry of activity has a vision behind it that could bear fruit in the 21st-century media environment. But new media is, in its own way, as vulnerable as traditional media is to government interference in highly controlled societies like Iran, Burma, China, or Russia. While new media has great potential to create and engage political forces, these are just forces that are being used from a U.S. point of view. Such forces may also be deployed by enemies of the United States. Georgetown University's Yahoo! fellow, Evgeny Morozov, noted at an October U.S. Helsinki Commission briefing that promoting new digital spaces "entails the same risk as promoting free elections: it's quite possible we may not like who wins them."[18] Furthermore, authoritarian governments are highly sophisticated in their efforts to control cyberspace, and -- just like democratic governments -- try to build alliances with likeminded online groups. Consequently, other new technologies like cell phones, and old technologies like shortwave radio, will continue to play an important role in resisting authoritarian regimes.
A case in point was the Iranian election in June, when the revolutionary potential of Web 2.0 really came into public focus. The elections and their dramatic aftermath provided the Obama Administration with a unique opportunity to put into action key elements of the U.S. government's public diplomacy strategy -- though that potential was hardly fulfilled. What the example of Iran showed was that Web 2.0 technology has the potential to play a role similar to that played by fax machines in the Solidarity uprising in Poland in the 1980s and cell phones in Ukraine's Orange Revolution in 2005. However, this potential can only be realized if technology is married to an active U.S. official government policy in support of the forces of democracy and self-determination. In and of themselves, the new media may change the technological game, but the political impact will fall short if the message from the U.S. government is not in strong support of American values and democracy. In Iran, the Obama Administration chose an official arm's length approach to the spontaneous public demonstrations.
As Iranian citizens took to the streets, disputing the re-election victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a wave of public protests swept through Iran. In these protests, the role of social networking -- both in organizing activities and sharing updates -- was widespread. The cyber activism surrounding the Iranian protests was unprecedented, driving the global debate.
The use of social-networking tools in Iran illustrates both the opportunities and the downsides of Web 2.0. On the one hand, "citizen reporters" were able to share stories instantaneously with a worldwide audience. Foreign correspondents that were otherwise prevented by the Iranian government from doing their jobs were able to rely on "crowd-sourcing" for their stories, which had to be filed from outside the borders of Iran or from hotel rooms to which the journalists themselves were often confined. Documentation of the brutal crackdown on the protestors appeared on YouTube, Facebook, and Flickr, and in blogs and e-mails. Mainstream media outlets, such as CNN and Fox News, relied on Iranian[19] citizen journalists both for content and the scheduling of events as they were unfolding. In turn, the Twitter revolution became a news story in its own right with the new media in a starring role.
On the downside, false reports were just as easily spread as accurate ones. And the Iranian government deployed a censorship strategy that was clearly well thought out and had been prepared in advance. After the initial surge of Internet activity, Tehran shut down Internet service nationwide, subsequently allowing a gradual but controlled increase in Web activity. This also included blocking access to mobile networks and satellite television. Since the Iranian government owns and operates radio and television outlets and supervises all newspapers and publications, it has a tight grip on information dissemination.[20]
Despite its tech-savvy reputation, U.S. government outreach was limited to the State Department's revelation that it requested the social Web site Twitter to postpone its scheduled maintenance operation in the days after the Iranian election. Undoubtedly, this action was important, but given the resources of the U.S. government, it was hardly proactive. The Obama Administration had chosen to take a hands-off approach in Iran, refusing to offer public support for the protestors in order to influence the election outcome. All of which meant that the potential of its tech-savvy approach to public diplomacy was not realized.
The New Media and the U.S. Government: Risk Analysis
While U.S. agencies have begun to use social-networking technologies for a range of activities, and while usage is growing by leaps and bounds, it was not until September this year that the official "Guidelines for Secure Use of Social Media by Federal Departments and Agencies, v1.0" was published by the Federal Chief Information Officers Council.[21] The document is intended for any federal agency that uses social media to collaborate and communicate among employees, partners, other federal agencies, or the public. It is therefore not specifically directed toward the U.S. government's use of social-networking media for public diplomacy purposes, but it is the closest thing the government has produced to a social media policy so far.
Most security risks involved in engaging in these activities are common to all departments that use them -- from the State Department to Defense to Homeland Security, from the FBI to the Education and Justice Departments. The guidelines point out that the social media are vulnerable to a variety of cyber attacks including "spear phishing," which targets a group of users with the goal of persuading them to perform an action that launches a computer virus, such as opening a document or clicking on a link.[22] Another type of attack, social-engineering, usually focuses on an individual, exploiting the wealth of personal information posted on social media Web sites.[23] In yet another type of Web application attack, a user may inadvertently grant a malicious Web application access to his Facebook account, or download unauthorized software to his computer. New Web technologies are also opening up new techniques for attackers.
Security challengesare the focus of the first set of official guidelines -- as opposed to any attempt at issuing guidelines for messaging or appropriate usage. The guidelines conclude that the decision to engage with social-media technology has to be made by each agency, and must identify mission requirements that justify the use of the technology. In other words, it is very much up to each agency to make this risk-based analysis and to accept the risks. The 19-page guidelines conclude that,
Finally, while a hijacked personal media account may be annoying and personally costly or embarrassing, a hijacked account of a federal user or a federal account may have more serious implications. Unofficial posts, tweets or messages may be seen by the public as official messages, or may be used to spread malware by encouraging users to click links or download unwanted applications.[24]
Federal Social Networking: How Effective Is it?
The phenomenon of social networking includes sites such as "Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and other interactive media tools to communicate with ever-expanding networks of family, friends and colleagues."[25] There are several popular social-networking sites used by the U.S. government, which essentially operate in the same way. Facebookis a site on which members create a personal profile, adding contacts to a "friend" list as well as joining interest groups, say, with information about home gardening, or in support of a particular political candidate. Anyone can post a personal profile or create a group, which is precisely what government organizations from U.S. embassies to the FBI have done. In April, the U.S. General Services Administration came to an agreement with Facebook (as well as several other sites such as Flickr and YouTube) that cleared the way for federal agencies to use social-networking Web sites based on special terms-of-service agreements for federal agencies. The agreements cover standard terms and conditions governing liability limits, endorsements, freedom of information, and legal jurisdiction. Since then, government agencies have been free to use Facebook as they see fit. The top five government Facebook pages frequented by the public are (1) The White House, (2) the U.S. Marine Corps, (3) the U.S. Army, (4) the U. S. Centers for Disease Control, and (5) the State Department.
Twitter posts, Facebook pages, and other Web postings are a mix of more or less official sites loosely coordinated, often administered only at the discretion of the users within the agency. Occasionally, as in the case of the Department of Defense, lower-level agencies within the department have conflicting policies. Though soldiers on Army networks are allowed to use Twitter and Facebook to post updates and photos to friends and family back home, the Marine Corps has banned the same sites from its networks, citing the difficulty of properly vetting this type of media.
The FBI provides an excellent example of the danger that sites such as Facebook represent for government agencies. Precisely because anyone can create a group, a search for "FBI" within Facebook's groups lists not only the FBI's career group, but several official-looking groups, with a seal similar or identical to the FBI's, which are completely unaffiliated. Agencies run the risk of people creating fake pages which may distort their image or message. To combat this from a liability standpoint, the government should publish an accessible, official list of social-networking pages in use by U.S. government agencies.[26]
U.S. embassies have seen the potential of social Web sites for facilitating public diplomacy. Embassies in Pakistan and Indonesia both have Facebook pages, offering information about the United States and American culture to an audience roughly 13 to 26 years of age. Degrees of success vary wildly, however. The U.S. embassy in Indonesia boasts 19,640 "fans" as of December 1. Its Web site bears an official U.S. government seal, and has a professional look that lives up to its diplomatic purpose. By contrast, the U.S. embassy in Pakistan has 539 Facebook "fans," and is more difficult to identify as an official group -- the site has no official seal, no State Department e-mail address, and a casual homemade look. This highlights the very pertinent question of official policy guidelines regulating U.S. government use of online social networking.
The challenges the U.S. government faces in harnessing social media are numerous. While it is essential that government have a coordinated message, the "grassroots" nature of social media makes it both difficult and somewhat undesirable to control them. The appeal of social media is precisely its feeling of intimacy and informality, and the government runs the risk of diminishing, even destroying, this appeal of social media through regulation. The content on social-networking sites should be both interesting and pertinent to individuals -- people, not formal information, are the essence of social interaction.
On the other hand, lack of regulation incurs serious risk for agencies involved in sensitive areas, such as defense and diplomacy. For regulation within the government to be effective, the government must establish policy guidelines (possibly similar to those applied by The Heritage Foundation to its blogs -- all Heritage blogs must be approved by the foundation's department directors and blog editors) without destroying the intimate feel of social networking. This media's strength lies in its freshness and unregulated feel, allowing people to become personally involved.
Finally, Internet access is not widely available in many regions of the world where the United States needs to be engaged. Though 75 percent of the U.S. population has access to the Internet, only 17.4 percent of the population in Asia and 5.6 percent in Africa are connected.[27] In many regions of the world shortwave radio and television still far outperform the new media. As far as technology is concerned the world is advancing at an uneven pace. This means that a national strategy must be based on sophisticated analysis and assessment of the relative effectiveness of platforms in various parts of the world. Such considerations are critical to success in the context of today's public diplomacy.
Cell Phone Technology: A Promising Tool for the Government
Twitter. Twitter is one of the 50 most popular sites on the Web,[28] receiving an average 55 million users each month.[29] Users (whether individuals, government agencies, or private groups) can create an account to send messages of up to 140 characters to other Twitter subscribers. The State Department's Dipnote Twitter account lists 8,986 "followers," Twitter users who specifically signed up to receive Dipnote tweets. Tweets are usually received as text messages on cell phones, often directing followers to lengthier content viewable on the sender's Twitter Web page. Government agencies are able to quickly set up Twitter accounts, making information widely available to interested members of the public. The Food and Drug Administration, for instance, issues food recalls via Twitter, and the State Department (Dipnote) and White House (USAtwitt) "tweet" alerts on press releases linked to their respective Web sites. Since Twitter relies on cell phones, it is widely available to 78 million cell phone users in Pakistan (44.3 percent of the population), and 10.5 million users[30] in Afghanistan (23 percent of the population, projected to climb to 72 percent by 2011).[31]
Twitter is clearly effective in communicating critical information during a rapidly unfolding situation, and has important potential as a public diplomacy tool for that reason. Twitter is a grassroots tool, ideally suited to spreading information that would otherwise have little or no means of transmission. From a "top-down" perspective, Twitter appears most promising for monitoring and rapid alert, allowing officials to react to unfolding events. This was exemplified in Iran during the post-election protests and violent government crackdown. Other examples are travel advisories to trouble spots, food and product recalls, and infectious disease alerts. State Department Spokesman Ian Kelly has referred to Twitter as "a vital tool for citizens' empowerment" in the context of the Iranian election.[32] This tool was also used extensively by Barack Obama's staff to organize and mobilize his base during the 2008 presidential election campaign.
The use of Twitter by the government to inform the public of its policies, agendas, and activities seems, however, to turn the medium's ideal use on its head -- possibly diminishing its impact through information overload of the medium and overexposure of government users.
Mobile SMS Text. An SMS (short message service) is a short text message sent by cell phone. The State Department has experimented with SMS text-diplomacy. Before President Obama's policy speech in Accra, Ghana, where he addressed the country's parliament, the State Department invited Africans to text their questions to the President and sent out SMS speech updates during his speech. Invitations to send text messages were posted on embassy Web pages and America.gov, the State Department's public diplomacy home page. Africans were encouraged to send their questions in French or English, and a select number received an SMS reply containing highlights of the President's speech. Regular service fees applied for texts sent to the President. The fact that texting is a fairly expensive medium for the users, who have to pay to receive messages, probably means that its scope is limited (a similar limitation applies to Twitter).
X-Life Games. One of the more unusual efforts launched as a part of the State Department's new media public diplomacy campaign are "X-Life" cell phone games. According to the games' creators, the first two games were launched in the Middle East to allow young people there to "experience the dynamism and vitality of American life" by "projecting the fundamental values that Americans cherish: tolerance, freedom, and respect for cultural and religious differences." The games wrap an American history lesson inside a video game for cell phones. Since their release in early 2009, the games have reached some 2,000 "registered gamers," the top five user nations being Egypt (438), Indonesia (323), USA (214), Lebanon (131), and Jordan (110).
Technological innovations such as X-Life capture headlines, but they pose a great risk of waste to taxpayers and to the State Department. Even a quick comparison and analysis of the cost-to-benefit measured in time, focus, and expense is telling. In order to launch this new medium, the State Department established a start-up tech company, MetroStar Systems, employing 75 people to create and maintain X-Life. This effort is currently reaching only an estimated 2,000 gamers, of which 20 percent are within the United States.[33] By contrast, the State Department's Facebook page setup is free, requires only two staff members to update its content, and reached 23,786 fans worldwide as of October 27.[34]
The U. S. government, traditional media, and the public often view "new media" as a magic tool, portending a revolution in the way the U.S. government conducts public diplomacy and addresses the world. In time, it may indeed be the "game changer" that Undersecretary McHale talked about in her confirmation hearing, and new media does make it possible to connect with previously unreached and under-engaged populations. However, to realize this advantage, the strengths, limitations, and risks of each media tool must be properly understood, and technologies must be wisely used to their respective comparative advantage. This is why the framework of a National Communications Strategy is desperately needed in order for U.S. public diplomacy to rise above mere strategy and tactics.
In her confirmation testimony before Congress, Judith McHale spoke of the need for just such a strategy. While Twitter, for instance, is excellent at providing small, timely bits of essential information, it is fatiguing and ineffective for routine updates. The U.S. government, in the person of the Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy, must provide agencies engaging in outbound communication with guidelines and metrics to establish that their use of new media is on message, recognizable as official, and wisely deployed in order to avoid destroying the intrinsic appeal of a given media to the target audience. Lastly, the government must realize that there are new media that are valuable tools, and others that are a distracting waste of time and taxpayer resources.
Congress and the Administration should:
Create a National Communications Strategy articulated by the Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy. The Administration has been tasked by Congress with producing such a strategy by December 31, 2009. If public diplomacy is to become an effective outreach tool for the U.S. government, it will be as part of a tool kit, a coordinated government-wide approach, and a deliberate effort to harmonize messaging. Such a strategy is critical for Public Diplomacy 2.0 to reach its potential and be more than decentralized, trial-and-error efforts by individual government departments.
Formulate government-wide guidelines to ensure that the new media is on message, as well as standards for official use of social media, ensuring that government Web pages can be identified and differentiated from impersonators without destroying the appeal of the particular media to its audience. Proper analysis of the way government agencies use social media will be needed to make Internet presence more than simply a nifty way of issuing press releases. "Web 2.0" is not a cohesive whole, but a collection of different, complementary tools that must be evaluated individually as well as in concert.
Establish a new non-governmental or semi-governmental research organization (a Corporation for Foreign Opinion Analysis) that can track the effectiveness and persuasiveness among foreign audiences of U.S. public diplomacy and strategic communications. A Corporation for Foreign Opinion Analysis would analyze the effectiveness of the new media in reaching targeted audience segments around the world, which vary widely according to the availability of technology, the control by autocratic governments of information flows, and local cultures.
When employed strategically, social-networking sites clearly offer potential for U.S. public diplomacy to reach younger, tech-savvy audiences around the world. Social-networking sites can also be cost-effective and run with relatively low overhead. Yet, nothing can replace the power of person-to-person contact and individual exposure to American culture. Furthermore, the unevenness of global technological progress means that a variety of media will remain critical to spreading the U.S. message. As part of a clear and calibrated U.S. government communications strategy, however, Public Diplomacy 2.0 can be a valuable tool.
Helle C. Dale is Senior Fellow for Public Diplomacy in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a Division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation. She wishes to thank Heritage intern Aaron Church for his assistance in the preparation of this paper.
Show references in this report
[1]Matt C. Armstrong, "Social Media as Public Diplomacy," Perspectives, Vol. 1, No. 2 (June 2009), at http://www.layaline.tv/publications/Perspectives/ MattArmstrong.html (November 20, 2009).
[2]David Herbert, "Agencies Struggling to Make Connections Online," National Journal, February 2, 2009, at http://www.nationaljournal.com/ njonline/no_20090126_4207.php (November 23, 2009).
[3]Cara Garretson, "Senator Says Internet Essential for Diplomacy," CNN.com, September 6, 2001, at http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/ internet/09/06/internet.diplomacy.idg/index.html (November 23, 2009).
[4]Bryant Jordan, "Net Diplomacy," Federal Computer Week, October 29, 2000, at http://www.fcw.com/Articles/2000/10/29/Net-diplomacy.aspx (November 23, 2009).
[5]Hampton Stephens, "Uncle Sam's Blog," The Boston Globe, March 14, 2005, at http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/ oped/articles/2005/03/14/uncle_sams_blog/ (November 23, 2009).
[6]Farah Stockman, "U.S. to Shift Envoys to Developing Countries," The New York Times, January 19, 2006, at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/19/ world/americas/19iht-diplo.html (November 23, 2009).
[7]Colleen Graffy, "The Rise of Public Diplomacy 2.0," The Journal of International Security Affairs, No. 17 (Fall 2009), at http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2009/17/graffy.php (November 23, 2009).
[8]Ben Bain, "State Department Opens Up with Dipnote Blog," Federal Computer Week, September 27, 2007, at http://fcw.com/articles/2007/09/27/state-department-opens-up-with-dipnote-blog.aspx (November 23, 2009).
[9]Jeremy Curtain, "U.S. Public Diplomacy 2.0," Public Diplomacy, June 27, 2009, at http://publicdiplomacymagazine.com/forum/us-public-diplomacy-20.
[10]"Transparency and Open Government: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies," The White House, January 21, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment (November 23, 2009).
[11]Tod Newcombe, "Vivek Kundra, Federal CIO, Addresses State CIOs," Government Technology, April 30, 2009, at http://www.govtech.com/gt/ 653151 (November 23, 2009).
[12]Merle David Kellerhals, Jr., "State's McHale to Spearhead U.S. Global Public Engagement," America.gov, June 2, 2009, at http://www.america .gov/st/peacesec-english/2009/June/20090602083933dmslahrellek0.6198542.html (November 24, 2009).
[13] Judith McHale, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Confirmation Hearing, May 13, 2009, at http://www.state.gov/r/remarks/124155.htm (December 2, 2009).
[14]"20K People Outside US Got Obama Speech Texts," Associated Press, June 6, 2009, at http://www.federalnewsradio.com/index.php?nid=27&sid=1689247 (November 24, 2009).
[15]Roy Furchgott, "State Department to Text Obama Speech," The New York Times, June 3, 2009, at http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/voice-of-america-to-become-texts-of-america (November 24, 2009).
[16]Jake Tapper, "The Speech (the White House Hopes) Heard 'Round the World: A Preview of President Obama's Speech to the Muslim World," ABC News, June 3, 2009, at http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/06/the-speech-the-white-house-hopes-heard-round-the-world-a-preview-of-president-obamas-speech-to-the-muslim-world.html (November 24, 2009).
[17]"An Invitation to Africans: Send a Message to President Obama," America.gov, July, 7 2009, at http://www.america.gov/st/peacesec-english/2009/July/20090702103907ptellivremos0.7542078.html (November 24, 2009).
[18]Helsinki Commission briefing, "Twitter Against Tyrants: New Media in Authoritarian Regimes," October 22, 2009, at http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewTranscript&ContentRecord_id=462&ContentType=H,B&ContentRecordType=B&CFID=23584766&CFTOKEN=37249586 (November 24, 2009).
[19]James Jay Carafano, "All a Twitter: How Social Networking Shaped Iran's Election Protests," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 2300, July 20, 2009, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternetandTechnology/bg2300.cfm.
[20]Graffy, "The Rise of Public Diplomacy 2.0."
[21]Federal Chief Information Officers Council, "Guidelines for Secure Use of Social Media by Federal Departments and Agencies, v1.0," September 2009, at http://www.cio.gov/Documents/Guidelines_for_Secure_Use_Social_Media_v01-0.pdf (November 24, 2009).
[22]Microsoft.com, "How to Recognize Phishing E-Mails or Links," 2009, at http://www.microsoft.com/protect/fraud/phishing/symptoms.aspx (November 24, 2009).
[23]Adrienne Felt and David Evans, "Privacy Protection for Social Networking APIs," University of Virginia, 2007, at http://www.cs.virginia.edu/felt/privacy/ (November 24, 2009).
[24]"Guidelines for Secure Use of Social Media by Federal Departments and Agencies, v1.0."
[25]Heather Forsgren-Weaver, "Defense Department to Announce Balanced Social Media Policy," U.S. Air Force, September, 24, 2009, at http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123169486 (November 24, 2009).
[26]Andrea DiMaio, "Faking Government Agencies on Facebook," Blogs.Gartner.com, July 9, 2009, at http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/09/faking-government-agencies-on-facebook (November 24, 2009).
[27]David Herbert, "Digital Divide Thwarts Online Diplomatic Efforts," National Journal, April 23, 2009, at http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/no_20090415_4481.php (November 24, 2009).
[28]Alexa, The Web Information Company, at http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com (November 24, 2009).
[29]Andy Kazeniac, "Social Networks: Facebook Takes Over Top Spot, Twitter Climbs," Blog.Compete.com, February 9, 2009, at http://blog.compete.com/2009/02/09/facebook-myspace-twitter-social-network (November 24, 2009).
[30]Jared A. Cohen, "Diverting the Radicalization Track," Policy Review, April and May 2009, at http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/41784647.html (November 24, 2009).
[31]Scott Simon, "State Department Guru Talks Twitter Diplomacy," NPR.org, October 17, 2009, at http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=113876776 (November 24, 2009).
[32]Ian Kelly, "Daily Press Briefing," U.S. Department of State, June 16, 2009, at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2009/24991.htm (November 24, 2009).
[33]Andrew Nusca, "With Video Games, Public Diplomacy by Mobile Phone," Smartplanet.com, August 25, 2009, at http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/smart-takes/with-video-games-public-diplomacy-by-mobile-phone/387 (November 24, 2009).
[34]U.S. Department of State group, available by signing on to http://www.facebook.com (November 24, 2009).


text:
VP, Research, Economic Development
Dr. Richard B. Marchase was named Vice President for Research in February 2005, having served as Acting Vice President for Research for six months. In 2007, Dr. Marchase's responsibilities expanded to include business development for the university research enterprise. Dr. Marchase joined UAB in 1986 as Associate Professor of Cell Biology and Anatomy. He was named Professor of Cell Biology in 1990. Later that year, he became Chair of that department, a position he held until 2000 when he was named Associate Dean for Biomedical Research for the School of Medicine. Dr. Marchase received his bachelor's degree in engineering physics from Cornell University and his doctorate in biophysics from Johns Hopkins University. He completed his postdoctoral training and then was named Assistant Professor at Duke University. He was an initial recipient of the Presidential Young Investigator Award from the National Science Foundation.
Learn more about UAB Research


text:
Lobster-Stuffed Beef Tenderloin with Bearnaise Sauce
- 2 rock lobster tails
- 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
- 1/4 pound pancetta or bacon, chopped
- 1/2 cup chopped shallots
- 3 tablespoons minced celery
- 2 teaspoons minced garlic
- 4 ounces baby chanterelle mushrooms, stems trimmed and sliced
- Salt and freshly ground black pepper
- 2 tablespoons minced green onions
- 2 tablespoons dry white wine
- 1 tablespoon chopped fresh parsley leaves
- 1 center-cut beef tenderloin, about 3 1/2 pounds, trimmed and butterflied
- Steamed fresh asparagus, as accompaniment
- Bearnaise Sauce, recipe follows
Preheat the oven to 400 degrees F.
Set up a large steamer. Place the lobster tails in the steamer and steam until just cooked through, about 6 minutes. Remove the lobster tails from the steamer. Cut along the underside of the shell and remove the tail meat whole. Set aside
In a large skillet, heat 1 teaspoon of the oil over medium-high heat. Add the pancetta and cook, stirring, until crisp and the fat is rendered, about 5 minutes. Remove with a slotted spoon. Drain off all but 2 teaspoons of fat from the pan. Add the shallots and celery and cook, stirring, until soft, about 2 minutes. Add the garlic and cook, stirring, for 30 seconds. Add the mushrooms and a pinch each of salt and pepper, and cook until the mushrooms give off their liquid, 3 to 4 minutes. Add the green onions and stir. Add the wine, increase the heat, and cook until it has nearly all evaporated, 1 to 2 minutes. Add the parsley and stir. Remove from the heat, stir in the cooked pancetta, and let cool.
Spread the butterflied beef, cut side up, flat on a surface. Spread the pancetta-vegetable mixture in a line across the meat, about 2 inches from the top, leaving a 1/2-inch border on the sides. Lay the lobster tails on top of the mixture, going across the beef. Pull the top flap over the lobster tails and roll the meat over the stuffing, jellyroll fashion, and tuck in the ends. Tie with kitchen twine every 2 inches.
Place in a large heavy roasting pan, rub on all sides with the remaining 2 teaspoons olive oil, and season lightly with salt and pepper. Place over medium-high heat and sear the meat on all sides, about 6 minutes. Place in the oven and roast to desired temperature, 30 to 35 minutes for medium-rare.
Transfer to a cutting board. Tent and let rest for 10 minutes before carving. Remove the kitchen twine and slice thickly. Place on a platter, surround with the asparagus, and drizzle with the Bearnaise Sauce. Serve immediately.
2 tablespoons chopped shallots
4 sprigs fresh tarragon
1/4 cup dry white wine
1/4 cup dry vermouth
4 large egg yolks
1 cup (2 sticks) melted unsalted butter or clarified butter
1 teaspoon fresh lemon juice
2 tablespoons chopped fresh tarragon leaves
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/8 teaspoon ground white pepper
In a small saucepan, combine the shallots, tarragon, white wine, and vermouth. Bring to a boil and cook until reduced to 2 tablespoons. Remove from the heat, strain, and cool.
In the top of a double boiler, or in a metal bowl fitted over a pot of barely simmering water, whisk the egg yolks and reduced wine until ribbons start to form. Whisking constantly, drizzle in the melted butter a bit at a time until all the butter is added and the mixture is thick. Remove from the heat. Whisk in the lemon juice, chopped tarragon, salt, and pepper. Adjust the seasoning, to taste. Cover to keep warm until ready to serve. To serve, place in a decorative bowl with a small sauce ladle.
Recipe courtesy of Emeril Lagasse, 2003
Cooking Tips
More Recipes and Ideas
Beef Tenderloin with Basil Crema with Watermelon-Basil Salad and Grilled Plantains
Recipe courtesy of Food Network Kitchen
Beef Tenderloin with Skordalia
Recipe courtesy of Food Network Kitchen


text:
This is an attractive hairstyle as Catherine Zeta Jones has her hair long and curly. The curls fall long down onto the back and over at the shoulders. A style like this is a great look for any special occasion.Catherine's haircut is long and layered.Her hair colour is dark brown.
Pictures provided by Retna


text:
Teddy bear pilot is one cool dudeSunday, May 15th, 2011
Bring the kids to the computer. Both the model airplane and the bear-pilot are remotely controlled, as are the cameras. For those that haven't seen it, click here . Or, if you want to fly your own autonomous drone, check out DIY Drones here.


text:
Westport Dining Room Set - 5 pcs.
Item #: 643889 | Model #: DM5005PC |
We're sorry, this item is not available in your selected Club. Check another Club
About this item$99 White Glove Delivery
(Click to learn about White Glove Delivery.)
The Westport dining room set is 100% solid wood and offers plenty of style through its use of clean lines and contemporary flair. Adding to its appeal is the use of deep, rich cherry veneers as well as architectural elements found in the legs. The side chairs have clean sophisticated lines that complement the design seen in the chair back. This five piece set includes the counter height table and four chairs.
For questions and inquiries please email email@example.com.
Assembled Country
Assembled Size
Component Country


text:
Sole Exercise Bikes
SOLE SB700 Indoor Cycle
NOW: $799.99(38% off!)
Was: $1299.99*
Free Shipping on Cardio Equipment! Online Only.
SOLE R92 Recumbent Bike
NOW: $999.99(44% off!)
Was: $1799.99*
Free Shipping on Cardio Equipment! Online Only.
SOLE Light Commercial Recumbent Bike
NOW: $1499.99(25% off!)
Was: $1999.99*
Free Shipping on Cardio Equipment! Online Only.
SOLE B94 Upright Bike
NOW: $799.99(46% off!)
Was: $1499.99*
Free Shipping on Cardio Equipment! Online Only.
Sole SB800 Air Bike
NOW: $899.99(35% off!)
Was: $1399.99*
Free Shipping on Cardio Equipment! Online Only.
SOLE Light Commercial Bike
NOW: $1299.99(27% off!)
Was: $1799.99*
Free Shipping on Cardio Equipment! Online Only.
Learn More About SOLE Exercise Bikes
Cycle on With SOLE
A Sole® exercise bike will help you reach your fitness goals comfortably in your own home.
Riding a stationary bike can offer a superb cardiovascular workout that is low-impact and easy to modify to your strengths and fitness needs. Your workout on a Sole® exercise bike can help strengthen your legs, hips, and glutes as you ramp up resistance during your ride.
Think about what type of work out you're looking for in your stationary Sole® exercise bike. A traditional upright exercise bike most resembles a regular bicycle. A recumbent bike will offer you additional back support and comfort as you exercise.
Expert Advice
Your Sole® exercise bike will be lightweight, easy-to-use and save space in your home.
Each model of Sole® exercise bike comes with a comfortable, sturdy seat and adjustable handlebars so you can work out with ease.
Sole® exercise bikes are constructed for quality and sturdiness and will deliver a leisurely, customizable workout, every day. Adjustable resistance on your Sole® bike will enable you to modify your workout. Your Sole® exercise bike will come with a variety of workout options that are easy to program and customize so you can change your fitness routine.
Look for the kinds of features that will enable you to make the most of your workout. A clear display with easy-to-use controls will give you real-time data on the distance and speed of your workout, as well as your calories burned, resistance level and much more.
Stay motivated and challenged with your Sole® exercise equipment.
Easy-to-use, customizable workout programs and resistance options will ensure that you can modify your workout at any time - whether you're looking to boost yourself to the next level or slow down the pace.
Road bikers or indoor cycling enthusiasts alike should look for comfort and durability in their indoor exercise bike. Sole's® patented two-degree inward design on its foot pedals place the body in correct posture, cutting down on aches and pains experienced by some users.


text:
Full biography
Thomas J. Watson Jr. was chairman and chief executive officer during IBM's most explosive period of growth. He led the company from the age of mechanical tabulators and typewriters into the computer era.
During his leadership, IBM grew from a medium-sized business to one of the dozen largest industrial corporations in the world. When Mr. Watson became CEO in 1956, IBM employed 72,500 people and had a gross income of $892 million. When he stepped down in 1971, employees numbered more than 270,000 and gross revenue was $8.3 billion. Fortune magazine once called him "the greatest capitalist who ever lived."
Mr. Watson was born in Dayton, Ohio, in 1914 -- the year his father left National Cash Register Co. to join IBM (then known as Computing-Tabulating-Recording Co.). He graduated from Brown University in 1937 and joined IBM in October of that year as a salesman in Manhattan.
Being the son of IBM's iron-willed chief weighed heavily on the younger Watson. In 1986 he told the Wall Street Journal, "The biggest motivation to me was fear and pride. Once I'd been around here a little while, I decided that my ambition was to prove to the world that I could run on the same race track as my dad. I liked the old gentleman; there was tremendous competition between us."
Mr. Watson's IBM career was on hold from 1940 to 1945 when he served as a B-24 pilot in the U.S. Army Air Corps. Upon returning to IBM in 1946, he rose rapidly, becoming vice president and a member of the board of directors within a year. By 1952, Mr. Watson was president, second in command to his father. In May 1956, Thomas Watson Sr. officially turned over the title of chief executive officer to his son six weeks before his death at age 82.
Mr. Watson pushed strongly to enter corporate computing, a field the company would come to dominate. His father initially resisted the huge investment required to build plants and laboratories to create a new generation of products and to hire armies of people to sell them. But as the demand grew for high-volume information processing the younger Watson's views prevailed.
Mr. Watson also broke with his father in establishing a more relaxed, decentralized style of management. Among his first accomplishments upon taking over the company was a major realignment, splitting IBM into six autonomous divisions and the World Trade Corp.
Mr. Watson stepped down as chairman and CEO in 1971, a year after suffering a heart attack. He remained a member of IBM's board of directors until 1984, taking time out from 1979 to 1981 to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union.
In 1941, Mr. Watson married Olive Field Cawley. They had a son and five daughters.
Mr. Watson died in Greenwich, Conn., on December 31, 1993 of complications following a stroke. He was 79


text:
STOTT PILATES Express CORE Mat
Product Information:
Practice your routine in ease with the STOTT PILATES® Express™ CORE Mat. Made of closed-cell foam and ribbed texture, this mat offers significant spine protection from hard surfaces and improves your balance during challenging work-outs. Integrated hook-and-loop straps allow you to simply roll and store your mat away or take it with you on the go. Safely strengthen your body with the STOTT PILATES® Express™ CORE Mat.
- Express™ CORE Pilates mat
- Closed-cell foam design for comfort from hard surfaces and spine protection
- Ribbed texture improves balance
- Integrated hook-and-loop straps allow for simple transport and storage
- Dimensions: 72" x 23" x 0.4"
- Weight: 2 lbs
- Style: ST-02154
Country of Origin: ChinaWeb ID: 22279656


text:
Tube Solar Links
Visit Our Blog
Learn more about how to make your home more energy efficient and save money on your cooling and lighting bills. Also see what other satisfied customers are saying about their new ECO Solar Light Tubes.
Visit our Solar Light Tube blog at Tube Solar Blog
Secure Site
© 2010 Eco Solar Light Tubes. All Rights Reserved. | 1-877-312-0373


text:
SOLIDWORKS Simulation Packages
Efficiently evaluate performance, improve quality, and boost product innovation with the powerful and extensive suite of SOLIDWORKS Simulation packages. You can set up virtual real-world environments to test your product designs before manufacture. Test against a broad range of parameters during the design process, such as durability, static and dynamic response, assembly motion, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and plastics injection molding.
SOLIDWORKS Simulation Premium
Related Packages: SOLIDWORKS Simulation Professional, SOLIDWORKS Simulation Standard, SOLIDWORKS Premium
SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation
Related Packages: HVAC Module, Electronics Cooling Module
SOLIDWORKS Plastics
SOLIDWORKS Sustainability
Featured Solutions
|Next steps:
|Get a Quote
|Contact Sales
|Get a Product Trial


text:
|Deliver Us From Evil
|119 Minutes
|Rated: R
|Rated R for bloody violence, grisly images, terror throughout, and language. -NY police officer Ralph Sarchie investigates a series of crimes. He joins forces with an unconventional priest, schooled in the rituals of exorcism, to combat the possessions that are terrorizing their city.
|More Info... Reviews...
Now Showing At:
Click times for Online Ticket purchases.


text: Gibson Trading Company gave Sheplers Western Stores their start! Founded in Wichita, KS in 1899 by J.W. Gibson, it was originally called the Gibson Harness Company. In 1946, Harry Shepler bought the company and changed the name to Sheplers Saddle & Leather, which paved the way for the world's largest western store! Now customers can find authentic Gibson Trading merchandise perfect for work or play exclusively at Sheplers! Gibson Trading Company apparel is authentic western wear for today's cowboys and cowgirls, and is exclusively available at Sheplers! This men's Gibson work jacket features a comfortable spread collar. Convenient zip front placket with secure snaps. Two side pockets with snap closures, and two inside pockets. Shell is 100% cotton & lining/insulation is 100% polyester. Imported. Sizes: M(40), L(42-44), XL(46-48), 2XL(50-52).


text:
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Remember When: Riki Tiki Tavi
8 comments:
Sometimes are memories just lead to mysteries, but it's worth the journey.ReplyDeleteReplies
Doesn't everybody love a good mystery?Delete
Hi Rita,ReplyDelete
Its good to be here,
I am here via this year's A to Z Blog Challenge Pages,
I have noticed that you are on board this year's a to z blog challenge/
Waiting to hear and read about your posts at a to z
A post with pleasant memories with a lovely pic. I really liked the way you present your thoughts here in these pages. yes.
I like it,
By the way this years A to Z challenge is fast approaching,
Hope you are working on it, good number of posts are aired at a to z pages as well as co hosters and other participants pages
I have noticed one thing that, since you registered your name for the challenge, you need to project the a to z badge at your pages and i noticed the last years badge at your page, i think its better to embed this years badge too, you can collect the html code from the pages of a to z
pl. embed the code at your side bar of the page,
C U At A to Z pages
Best Regards
I am
Phil @ Philipscom
An ambassador to A to Z Challenge @ Tina's Life is Good
And My Bio-blogReplies
Thank you. I'm working away on my posts.Delete
I don't have the answer to your question, but maybe asking more questions will help lead you to the answer. Very often the meaning behind flashes is less literal, having more to do with associations.ReplyDelete
Do you remember if there was ever a snake on your porch? Or someone with a shady personality--snakelike? Do you remember the Donovan song from the '60s, Rikki Tikki Tavi? Could you have heard that song while you were on your porch? Or had it running through your head? Could an ad for the Disney Rikki Tikki Tavi have flashed on the TV screen before you went out on to the porch?
Hmmm....think of the questions and maybe they'll lead you to an answer. And PLEASE let us know if and when you solve the puzzle!Replies
No answers yet but it's been fun reading all the comments and even the puzzle of figuring it out.Delete
Maybe the classic cartoon he's on a porch here: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l4qk2qM6NK1qb3mmfo1_400.jpg or you could have seen a squirrel?ReplyDeleteReplies
None of these things have lead to more of a memory. But that's okay. It's been lots of fun trying to figure it out.Delete


text:
Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (24 votes).
In short: Very picturesque but with couple of killer hillsDate of review: September 16, 2012
In short: Great way to spend a Sunday morningIn full: Thanks to everyone involved in this event - it was well organised and a great course. It was good to run past some of the other sites in the National Forest - a bit of sightseeing en-route. Decent T shirt.Date of review: September 16, 2012
In short: Scenic and good first 10kIn full: This was my first 10k race and having done a few of the 5k Parkruns that partly run along the same route, I kind of knew what to expect.On a mixed surface of generally well metalled footpaths, it is flat for large periods with a few undulating sections and one beast of an incline which comes after about 4 miles but is very short. The downhill for the last mile or so is very welcoming!The organisation was very good. Not bad for spectators as you can head up some of the tracks and paths yourselves but if you want to watch the runners, there's only really the start and finish areas which the runners also pass at around 2 miles.The timing is manual but based on my GPS watch they were pretty spot on. The goodies at the end consist of a t-shirt and a water bottle but no medal.Overall a very well run event on a scenic trail that is challenging in places but generally good for all levels.Date of review: September 16, 2012
In short: Very well organised with some unexpected hills. Nice t-shirt tooIn full: This is one of the 'hillier' 10ks I have done and throughly enjoyed it. The volunteers on the course gave you a smile and a cheer which was great - very encouraging. Mixed abilities and general fun atmosphere so would suit anyone. Not good for a PB as quite undulating but super nonetheless :) Date of review: September 16, 2012
In short: Challenging but well worth doing.Date of review: May 17, 2012
In short: Well organised & enjoyableIn full: This was my second 10K & really enjoyable - but with the hills tough to get a PB! Oranisation was very good and the Marshalls were excellent. Will do again next year & attempt to crack the hour!Date of review: September 29, 2011
In short: Once again a great eventIn full: Second year I've done this one and I'll make every effort to be back again next year. Great organisation, excellent marshalling, good and challenging course through lovely countryside, top friendly atmosphere and a really good quality T-shirt to commemorate the event. Hats off to the organisers, well done!Date of review: September 21, 2011
In short: Great first 10KIn full: This was my first 10K and I really enjoyed it. The atmosphere was relaxed and fun. The course was very scenic and well-marshalled. The marshals were friendly with an encouraging word or a clap as you went past.The hills weren't too much for a first-timer like me, and I managed to hit my target time of sub 50. So I was very pleased.I'm glad the other reviewers mentioned the missing km markers. I didn't see 6-8 either!The fun run for the kids was great too: friendly costumed characters led the kids off to the start of their one-mile race. My son took part and really enjoyed it.And after all that you can have a fun day out in Conkers with the family. Can't be bad!Date of review: September 20, 2011
In short: Very good organisation, everyone very friendly & lovely courseIn full: Excellent. Recommend this run to everyone, mostly off road but on well worn paths, marshalls everywhere & all very encouraging. Thanks to everyone involved, one for my diary next year.Date of review: September 19, 2011
In short: Excellent course/setting & facilitiesIn full: Very pleasant setting to hold a running event. 99% away from road on hard trails (road shoes fine). Not a tough course, so doable for all. Good facilities & start/finish close to each other & near to the ample parking area in CONKERS. Fast downhill to finish was most welcome! Lovely coloured very wearable t-shirt.Chap doing the commentary was very good...almost everyone got a mention & you could hear every word! Only gripe was that km markers 6-8 appear to have been stolen...rather disconcerting to those of us not familiar with the area as not sure how far I'd done or got left to go,'til I saw 9k marker. Otherwise plenty of marshalls in the right places. Would do again.Date of review: September 18, 2011
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Click here
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
Injury Clinics
About Runner's World


text:
Too bad that Noggin did not introduce himself to Sam as "The Champion" just to see his reaction :twisted:
About how many people attended?
How would you describe the demographic of the attendees?
I'm terrible at head-counts in large rooms, CA :oops:, and each event was attended by only some of the attendees. Noggin, for example, was only there for Sam. At that sitting, I'll take a stab and guess maybe 300-400? Nogs may be better at guestimating.
The demographic seemed more mature overall—40s, 50s and 60s, mostly, and several in their 70s—with 20-, 30-somethings appearing to be in the minority. There were, I believe only half a dozen minors present at Julia Sweeney's show on Saturday, and there were also more people in attendance that show, perhaps another 100, because it immediately followed a sit-down dinner.
Sadly, neither of us thought to ask if Sam knew of the champ . Just think, if the answer was yes, then champ might have to start speaking nicely of Sam, knowing he's being watched by the Master of his playground .
He did reinterate that his strong suit is definitely not in organizing group efforts, but that he has been approached about doing a documentary. Details are entirely cloudy at this stage. He seems realistic, as we are, that this is going to be slow-going in the USA.
Personally, I am more pessimistic than Sam is. The faithful are indeed out-breeding everybody else. . . but on the bright side, we might have achieved time-travel within one more generation. Unfortunately, it will likely involve a one-way trip back into the 14th century for all of us :?.
Thank you for the post, Mia. Please tell us more when you feel like it.
Sadly, neither of us thought to ask if Sam knew of the champ Razz. Just think, if the answer was yes, then champ might have to start speaking nicely of Sam, knowing he's being watched by the Master of his playground Wink.
Last May, in a thread called "Why Do You Guys Put Up with This?", the champ wrote (and I quote verbatim) "Sam likes me." I don't recall any further explanation. It does not pass the limits of my imagination to contemplate being friends with someone afflicted with tuberculosis either. I just don't want to share his handkerchief.
[quote author="Mia"]
For those who were interested in getting a recording of the speeches, I saw no sound technicians of any sort there. It was relatively low-tech overall, even casual. There was no special stage lighting, either. You might try calling or emailing the Freedom From Religion offices, though, since they would certainly know if recordings exist. Phone numbers and emails are on the site referenced in the first post.
A convention like that probably wouldn't be handled by a staging company. They just use the house A/V staff. They plug the microphones into a mixer and into the wall and out the little speakers in the ceiling it goes. If they want to sell tapes and cds of the event, sometimes there are people (we affectionately call 'em "tapeworms") who hang out behind the scenes, usually at a big patch bay, and record all the sessions. They then burn discs out assembly-line style for sale at the event. If Mia didn't see any kiosks selling day of convention recordings, it probably wasn't recorded at all. Pity. It's sad I couldn't make it, 'cuz I definitely would have had my little lappytop all set up to record a la Spider Jerusalem :D .
Not for sale mind you, just for me and my friends' enjoyment.
Plus, I'm far more suave than Spider Jerusalem. And more real as well :wink: