text:
Let's Get Better: Stunning Facts About Mental Health In The African American Community That'll Blow Your Mind
Surprising Mental Health Facts
We're sure by now you've heard of the tragedy that struck the Kansas City Chiefs organization as Jovan Belcher murdered the mother of his child and killed himself. The whole story is a rude awakening about the struggles of mental health, especially in the African American community.
We're taking this time to highlight some alarming facts that we should all pay attention to and find ways to make our situations better. Take a look. And take notes.
And to make sure you pay attention, we'll include pics of great-looking celebrities. Deal? Deal.
Less than half of African American adults with mental illness seek treatment and less than one third of their children receive treatment.
African Americans make up forty percent of the homeless population. The majority of them are suffering from mental illnesses and are self-medicating
African Americans are 20 percent more likely to report having serious psychological distress than Whites


text:
Bucs Sign Tight End; Place Crabtree on I.R.
Tampa Bay signed tight end Kyle Adams on Wednesday. The spot was open when the team placed tight end Tom Crabtree on injured reserve with a torn biceps. Adams is 6-foot-4 and 255 pounds. In his third season, Adams entered the league as a college free agent out of Purdue with the Chicago Bears. He's played in 24 games with two starts. He has four catches for 40 yards in his career.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Lots of polls show that foreign publics have a poor opinion of the U.S. Some people argue that this means the U.S. should change its policies to make them more popular outside the U.S. Others contend that foreign policy decisions need to reflect U.S. national interests, irrespective of their popularity.
Does the popularity of United States matter and should it affect policy decisions?
Ralph in Greece writes:
I think that the U.S.A. should not weigh heavily (foreign public opinion) when making U.S. policy. Sure, listening to foreign opinion can be useful as is any marketing-research, but ultimately U.S. policy should set for citizens of the United States of America.
With this said, it would not hurt to enlist our most trusted allies toward a common goal in foreign policy around the world.
However, please do not let anti-American sentiment around the globe turn Americans into appeasers, or back us away from our objectives.
Karl in U.K. writes:
National interests should always come first, that is the primary duty of government anywhere not just the United States. I write as a British citizen.
The issue hinges on whether the national interest is better served by implementing policies promoting mutual understanding and long-term benefits or, by short term or purely selfish policies that undermine other nations' peace and prosperity.
While I believe the United States is a force for good in the world, recent years have demonstrated world opinion is deeply unhappy and justifiably so. Is this the result of selfish short-term policies or as a result of long-term efforts that only happen to be unpopular at the moment?
Only time will tell.
David in U.S. writes:
For nearly five decades, I worked on assistance projects in 42 developing nations. During my early years, most of the indigenous populations viewed the U.S. as the "beacon-on-the-hill." In recent years, most indigenous populations view the U.S. as the "outhouse-in-the-swamp." The opinions of those we seek to assist, for reasons of our own national security interests, must generally be positive in order for the U.S. to achieve its goals. Over the years, we have failed to properly identify why we are "cultivating" hatred. The U.S. does not need to focus on making policies that make us popular --- but we do need to design policies creating obvious benefits for host nations and peoples. Once we can do this, the U.S. will obtain cooperation (if not popularity) as we seek to accomplish our objectives.
Jessica in China writes:
@ Ralph in Greece -- Ralph, you wrote : "With this said, it would not hurt to enlist our most trusted allies toward a common goal in foreign policy around the world."
I think that is the problem with American foreign policy nowadays. We all agree on the fact that the United States is the most powerful and influencial country at the moment. But this position does not entail eternal wisdom. When you talk about "enlisting trusted allies" you make it sound as though their opinion did not count.
A policy -especially a foreign policy- should of course be based on a country's needs, but it should also be discussed with others.
To change one's opinion after hearing out someone else's point of view is not a sign of weekness but on the contrary a sign of intelligence and self-confidence.
Shane in California writes:
The focus of our foreign policy needs to reflect U.S. national interest irrespective of their popularity, but it's obvious that our job is made harder by animus from our partners. Is the reason for this animus always the result of well thought out reactions to assumed injuries by America? Of course not, and it follows that this country, being as influential as it is around the world, will attract discontent with the policies and proscriptions we choose to employ. It's a big world, with many players, and the reactions to American influence are largely political and cultural, and often compartmentalize the aid and charity this country gives and the decisions it makes relative to our interests. If we are to take the opinion of those in the Middle East seriously, then they need to control the killers that stream out of that region. If we are to take the opinions of Europeans seriously, then they need to assume responsibility for their own security and send Americans defending them home. It's easy to bite the hand that feeds you to soothe the feelings of inadequacy that arise from being dependent on hand outs. I think America deserves some credit for taking such ingratitude with grace...
Jon in U.S. writes:
In an increasingly globalized world, the opinions of foreign nations in regards to the U.S.'s policies should take a bigger role. We can't do it on our own. Right after 9/11, world support for America was at an all-time high. There were even pro-U.S. demonstrations in Iran? What happened since then? Where did our administration go wrong? I believe that our administration took 9/11 as a blank check to do whatever it wanted, which history will show was a poor decision and decreased our moral standing in the world.
Lorenzo in Italy writes:
I think every national government, but in particular U.S. government, has got the option of conducting their foreign policy disregarding foreign audiences opinions. The point I want to make here, though, is that the United States(and only the United States) has demonstrated to have the capacity to work together other nations in the name of common ideals and not ONLY interests!
Which is this ideal nowadays? â€Worldwide democracy?†Well I don't think it could be the winning one! Economic growth? Well yes, this still works, but it became clear that growth cannot be unlimited.
Ideal is about giving people a positive picture of the future, and why not, by using a bit of imagination, because if it is the leader of the biggest 'kid in the block' using it, then people will be more likely to dream!
I strongly think that U.S. should lead and not undergo the environmental pollution issue which is constraining economic growth and producing dramatically pessimistic views of the future. It's exactly at this point that US leadership should break in. The ideas will provide political support worldwide in as much as new markets.
P.S. I apologize for my English!!
Matt in Texas writes:
I think essentially foreign policy is a popularity contest, so yes the popularity of the United States matters. I also think that in a time of globalization, foreign and domestic affairs are becoming blurred. Meaning that what goes on over there affects us over here, and vice versa. As such, I feel that a foreign policy that is beneficial to other countries is beneficial to the United States.
Certainly the United States should look after its own interests first, but to a point. If we pursue a policy that is always "the United States first" and everyone else second, then we will find ourselves isolated and countries unwilling to deal with us. At some point, we have to be willing to level the playing field.
I think history has shown that policies that focus on only that countries policies without regard to the other country, have unforeseen consequences. A good example is Afghanistan.
Joe in Tennessee writes:
The ideology of strengthening Democracy worldwide is paramount to maintaining a secure democratic base in the U.S.
I'm afraid that more often than not, there are peripherals which are not direct policy of any presiding administration, but reflections of what is perceived by our Social and Corporate actions here in the U.S. and overseas which are the underlying cause of problems.
The consideration of culture, which is something that is not transferable, is confused with Policy as well.
The feeling that policy will mandate an alteration of culture is the major problem in the Middle East. Though this is not the case, it is the platform base for propaganda used by the terrorist.
Perhaps better insight to merging and understanding of goal orientation of policy is needed at both ends of policy and extended more directly to the citizens involved.
Michael in Missouri writes:
Yes, it matters, especially when we encourage allies to go along with policies unpopular in their home countries. They throw out the canard that they cannot support us because of anti-U.S. sentiment, when the reasons may be different (or that might very well be the reason). That being said, we need to do what's in our interest.
S in San Francisco writes:
Do foreign publics have a poor opinion of the U.S., or of the current U.S. foreign policy? I suspect the later. As do the majority of Americans. The U.S. should change it's foreign policy toward embracing international security and stop letting thirst for control of fossil fuels drive policy. If all the resources that went into Iraq went instead to hunting down Osama Bin Laden, and ensuring that his potential recruits had realistic, better economic alternatives, would Al-Qaeda be as big a threat as it is today, now more than 6 years since 9/11? Public opinion abroad is not a road-map to steer-by, but rather a warning light that we might not be adhering to the Golden Rule. God Bless the U.S.A. Let us learn and move-on.
Mario in New Jersey writes:
We are reaping the rational judgment of decades of foreign policies that have focused either on providing aid in order to obligate or curry favor toward us, or on pursuing our own goals without regard for the interest of others. America has been at her best -- and rightly perceived so -- when we have acted in our own interests but also in pursuit of our higher, global values (e.g. the Marshall Plan). No nation with pride wants to be manipulated, whether by bribery or coercion. But nations can sometimes see beyond pride in order to join with others in pursuit of a noble, mutually beneficial goal. I long for the return of the spirit in which WE can see beyond OUR pride.
Zharkov writes:
Of course popularity matters. Saddam Hussein was highly unpopular with Arab nations, so there was little protest when the U.S. decided to invade. In some cases, a nation's popularity, or lack thereof, creates foreign policy.
Regarding Guantanamo, the chief of the U.S. military said Sunday he favors closing the prison there as soon as possible because he believes negative publicity worldwide about treatment of terrorist suspects has been "pretty damaging" to the image of the United States.
"I'd like to see it shut down," Adm. Mike Mullen said in an interview with three reporters who toured the detention center with him on his first visit since becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last October.
The perception that the U.S. government is controlled by war criminals has resulted in arrest warrants issued for Donald Rumsfeld, C.I.A. employees, Henry Kissinger, and others, over the years. This perception appears to be supported by sufficient evidence to convince various judges to issue arrest warrants. A lack of popularity can have serious consequences for our leader's holiday plans.
Eric in New Mexico writes:
Inherently, change is viewed with suspicion as a threat to culture and ways of tradition and ethical belief systems. As it applies to developing countries in this nuclear age, the post-cold war aftermath presents a vast paradox that present no easy solutions, and has culminated in the reality of the war on terrorism as it exists today.
Being the world's "only superpower" has made the U.S. prime cannon fodder for hegemonic conspiracy theorists, and often we are accused by hostile nations of what they themselves are most guilty of.
Bin laden's strategy was to use 9/11 as a trigger to get us to react in a way that would discredit the U.S. by the indiscriminate use of overwhelming force in response. This he believed would be the source of legitimacy for his global call for holy war. Didn't exactly turn out as he wished, did it?
1.3 billion Muslims aren't stupid...at the end of the day, what has jihad built? Capital investment? A better standard of living? Better schools, housing and infrastructure? Security? Peaceful coexistence? A prosperous society?
Khomeini's "Utopia"?????
Today one sees the reaction of the Iranian government to the President's speech on Sunday in which he stated a blunt and undeniable fact. That the world's leading sponsor of terror is a threat to all nations.
There are so many reasons already existing as to why someone should step on the Grand Ayatollah's neck and the collective neck of the Iranian government, that the latest NIE is worthless to those who would seize upon its conclusions to achieve "peace at any price".
Historically, the facts are clear. You don't make love or war half-way. Ain't nobody gonna be satisfied, no way, no how. So why on this blue Earth would anyone contemplate the folly of thinking a few cruse missiles or diplomacy alone would equal "behavior change" from a theocratical mindset that takes its cue from a twisted interpretation of "God's will" , not the political will of the international community.
My idea of a "diplomatic effort" would therefore be to offer the Mullahs the chance to go back to the mosque and abhor politics forevermore, to preach peace so they could live in peace, or suffer serious consequences.
If the final tally of pro's and con's are summed up in decision making by the intent to save lives; as to whether the international community can afford to allow this abysmal excuse for a government to continue to exist as a continued threat to global peace and security.
Let us then hope we have the common sense and purpose to ensure the quickest, most effective regime change ever executed via force of arms and diplomacy.
I mean everybody. Russia, China, NATO, being the first time in 60+ years we've stood on the same side against terror and tyranny. Funny how things come full circle sometimes, naturally, and of necessity.
To bomb or not to bomb is not the question. Rather when does it become necessary to level the playing field for the Iranian people to have half a chance to realize a future free from ethical infants who are driving their people over oblivion's cliff? Dragging the entire region into chaos along with is not acceptable. Naturally enough, those who sponsor terror should live in fear.
I would remind those who consider anything "limited" as an option of the human cost of leaving Saddam Hussein in power after Gulf War I. The Taliban and Osama...9/11...and the results of "limited" is quite obviously that we'll be back to clean up a mess and get the job done right in a few years hence, leaving increasing risk ever present until then.
I'm for doing things effectively the first time. You save lives that way, even in war. We are at war whether we want to be or not, whether we admit we are or not, we are in a state of hostilities with the government of Iran, not just Al-Qaida....28 years on now since Khomeini publicly endorsed our demise as a nation and invested time, manpower, and state resources to achieve it.
Some say that the best way to prolong the regime is to bomb it. Based on an erroneous premise that there will be a regime left to contemplate tapping into some mythical "people's support" after the bombs fall.
One would think 70 million Iranians wouldn't let their government put them at risk if Uncle Sam and Co. decides to change the ethical infant's diapers, but 28 years of organized oppression has had an effect on the Iranian people's ability to act of their own accord in an organized manner to change their system of government.
The one great strength America has going beyond all others from a credibility standpoint is that we as a nation actually give folks a choice and a chance. Not just with a vote, but we have the common decency to give nations and peoples the choice between war and peace.
Zharkov writes:
The term, "foreign policy", is too general, while the policies which the U.S. government implements that anger foreign citizens are usually specific things that can easily be listed by them. So which policies might be a problem? Has the State Department ever taken a survey of foreign citizens in europe or elsewhere to determine which American foreign policy bothers them, or does State rely entirely on editorials in the New York Times?
Could it be that foreign citizens resent CIA and State Department meddling in their domestic politics and elections?
Certainly the Russians object to being lectured about democracy by the State Department while the CIA is fomenting "color revolutions" in Eastern Europe. The Serbs objected to being bombed by NATO and to American support for an independent Kosovo which historically is part of Serbia; and it is not surprising that the average Russian agrees with Serbia. Iraqis object to American proposals to occupy Iraq for the next 100 years.
American influence on foreign elections reveals a pattern of officious intermeddling through CIA-created NGOs, threats, bribes, support for coups, dirty tricks, disinformation, financing opposition parties, while the American national interest in all of this is far from clear. Yassir Arafat died a multimillionaire on U.S. foreign aid, as did African dictators, yet their people are still dying in miserable civil wars. The American interest in spending American tax money to create an elite club of wealthy foreign heads of state is unclear, and unrelated to any legitimate American interest.
However, when OPEC was created to monopolize oil pricing - a form of economic warfare which was directly against the American national interest - almost nothing was done by the U.S. government other than a rather faint grumbling from Congress mostly for domestic consumption.
Oil has since risen from 25 cents a barrel to $100.00 a barrel while OPEC threatens to raise it far higher, indicating that $100.00 seems rather cheap in the opinion of the wealthy Saudi families.
What sanctions have the State Department proposed against OPEC members and their oil trust, along with Sherman Act co-conspirators, the oil companies?
Which is the bigger threat to America's national interest, Iran or ten thousand dollar-a-barrel oil?
Where is the national interest in saving Iran's voters from their own government, which they elected, while OPEC renders it extremely expensive to send US troops anywhere? The fuel burned by the U.S. military in the Vietnam War helped to exhaust the domestic U.S. oil supply and the oil imported for military use in Iraq is gone forever, along with the dollars that bought it. Our 50% devaluated dollar is sinking fast while Saudi-dominated OPEC has decided to dump it permanently, the equivalent of an economic attack worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 combined. Oddly, there is still time to neutralize OPEC but no official interest in doing so. Why?
It's obvious that the present popularity of American government is as low in the rest of the world as it is in America. Perhaps the way to start improving America's image is by looking out for America's own national interest for a change? This is the "change" people want from the next election.
Dan in Washington, DC writes:
Regarding the inter-relationship between U.S. popularity, our nation's foreign policy and our principles, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the late Senator / Ambassador and great thinker, offered these provocative perspectives, found in his 1984 book Loyalties "…but that is what principles are for: to inform conduct when affairs seem out of control or beyond comprehension."
That the U.S. was one of the oldest standing governments on earth -- one of only eight that has not had its form of government changed by force since 1914, and that as one of these oldest government, we "had learned the importance of elemental truth-telling and the appalling cost of lies."
That "arrogance is yet a great danger. And there is a certain arrogance in the view that the behavior of other nations is primarily responsive to the behavior of (the U.S.)"
And more recently, Moynihan offered these remarks, relative to the purpose and popularity of U.S. engagement in the world, during a 2002 commencement address to Harvard University (this entire Moynihan's speech can be found at http://www.commencement.harvard.edu/2002/moynihan.html):
(It was once written) that America was "the land of the second chance" and so indeed it seemed. Because we (now continue to) have that second chance; A chance to define our principles and stay true to them. The more then, to keep our system open as much as possible, with our purposes plain and accessible, so long as we continue to understand what the 20th century has surely taught, which is that open societies have enemies, too. Indeed, they are the greatest threat to closed societies, and, accordingly, the first object of their enmity.
We are committed, as the Constitution states, to "the Law of Nations," but that law as properly understood. Many have come to think that international law prohibits the use of force. To the contrary, like domestic law, it legitimates the use of force to uphold law in a manner that is itself proportional and lawful.
Democracy may not prove to be a universal norm. But decency would do. Our present conflict, as the President says over and again, is not with Islam, but with a malignant growth within Islam defying the teaching of the Q'uran that the struggle to the path of God forbids the deliberate killing of noncombatants. Just how and when Islam will rid itself of current heresies is something no one can say. But not soon. Christianity has been through such heresy -- and more than once. Other clashes will follow.
Certainly we must not let ourselves be seen as rushing about the world looking for arguments. There are now American armed forces in some 40 countries overseas. Some would say too many. Nor should we let ourselves be seen as ignoring allies, disillusioning friends, thinking only of ourselves in the most narrow terms. That is not how we survived the 20th century.
Nor will it serve in the 21st.
Last February, some 60 academics of the widest range of political persuasion and religious belief, a number from here at Harvard, including Huntington, published a manifesto: "What We're Fighting For: A Letter from America."
It has attracted some attention here; perhaps more abroad, which was our purpose. Our references are wide, Socrates, St. Augustine, Franciscus de Victoria, John Paul II, Martin Luther King, Jr., Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
We affirmed "five fundamental truths that pertain to all people without distinction," beginning "all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights."
We allow for our own shortcomings as a nation, sins, arrogance, failings. But we assert we are no less bound by moral obligation. And finally, ...reason and careful moral reflection ... teach us that there are times when the first and most important reply to evil is to stop it.
But there is more. Forty-seven years ago (following the end of WWII), on this occasion (Harvard's commencement ceremony), General George C. Marshall summoned our nation to restore the countries whose mad regimes had brought the world such horror. It was an act of statesmanship and vision without equal in history. History summons us once more in different ways, but with even greater urgency. Civilization need not die. At this moment, only the United States can save it. As we fight the war against evil, we must also wage peace, guided by the lesson of the Marshall Plan -- vision and generosity can help make the world a safer place.
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Zarkov -- Zarkov wrote;
"Which is the bigger threat to America's national interest, Iran or ten thousand dollar-a-barrel oil?
Where is the national interest in saving Iran's voters from their own government, which they elected, while OPEC renders it extremely expensive to send US troops anywhere."
Well Zarkov, I'd say if the Mullahs of Iran try and make good on their repeated threats to close the Persian Gulf to international shipping, you won't have to worry about the price of oil because all the other affected OPEC nations in the region will gladly donate it to us to rid them of Iran's ethical infants. Besides, we're already there. Cost in dollars isn't the issue, it's the human toll that folks like the President are trying to mitigate....thus diplomatic solutions are being explored by all concerned.
As far as your understanding of Iranian politics goes, I have a little story that might amuse you. See, a friend of mine has family there, and one of them was arrested for making a comment about the election in 2005. Released the day of the election on the condition that he get all 30 of his family members to vote 3 times apiece...or face prison.
I found it interesting that there were campaign posters hung in the streets, written in English....as eye candy for the Western press. Guess they did a good job of convincing you that Iranian elections are legitimate, and reflect the will of the people.
That the candidates were chosen for the people from get go, not by them, must have escaped your notice.
But then, considering that the rest of your post is rather exaggerated and a parody of the truth in general, I'm not at all surprised you think the Dept. of State formulates foreign policy recommendations to the President after reading a New York Times editorial (chuckle).
I've often wondered why folks that have complaint don't seem to offer solutions along with. Seems only fair, so I do.
Well my friend, my dad and I were having a talk on politics long ago and he had some sage advice for me that seems appropriate to pass on here (may it serve you well):
"Son", he said, "Never believe anything you hear, and only half of what you read. But believe what you see and get your eyes checked often."
Last time I got my eyes checked, there were a whole lot more people with a chance to live the way they want, free to build nations in their own cultural idioms than ever before, thanks in part to the US standing with them in their struggles for freedom. But mostly because they themselves demanded it of their own accord.
As a nation, we can offer up and voice a concept called democracy, even provide a number of blueprints from a few successful democracies to provide inspiration to those building their own. But it is after all their nations, not ours, and they are the ones that must live with their creation.
It is in our national interests to see that they can. Why? Because we Americans have this seemingly unique ability to turn enemies into friends via democracy.
Joseph in Virginia writes:
I think that those that dislike U.S. foreign policy, at least in the Middle East, do not see it as driven but U.S. interests so much as interest groups in the U.S. In fact, many have argued, in the U.S. and abroad, that U.S. Middle East policy does not truly act in the best interests of the nation.
This perception erodes the belief that the U.S. is a wise democracy and serves as justification for distrust of America and violence against her. The perception may or may not be right, but it does not need to be right to be powerful.
Ronald in New York writes:
Is America's popularity important? Does it matter? If you are still asking, you might never get it. Are you looking for a 51% response that says: "We don't care how others see us, and we won't change even if they don't like us?" How infantile can you get?
NB in Pakistan writes:
YES, the popularity of the United States of America matters a lot because the U.S. is the superpower and it should make it its job to see that peaceful co-existence is realized among the nations of the world. No other country can do this job as well as the U.S.A.
Siddhartha in India writes:
U.S.A. as a country is the most reported nation in the media.
I am in my early 20's currently pursuing my MBA . I have grown up witnessing the U.S. bulldogging its way everywhere. The popularity of late has been negative popularity and it should not affect policy decisions. Which I am afraid, has affected the policy decisions more often than not.
The United States should understand that just because it's the most powerful country (military & economy) nobody has given you guys the right to bully people. You know people don't like bullies. And by becoming a bully you are not only making new enemies but also making friends turn foes.
I don't why you guys can't mind your own business?
The UN is there for world issues, but it seems the us has made the un look like a puppet, which is very true.
So please stop influencing people the wrong way. Right influence is always welcomed. Corporate U.S.A. has got the right influence across the globe. But the same cannot be said for the government of the United States.
Trakker in U.S. writes:
No, you don't design your foreign policies to please the rest of the world, BUT when you find that a majority of the people around the world oppose our foreign policies, you must ask why and be very honest in determining the answer(s). I don't feel our current Administration has done this. Our President merely assumes "they hate is for our freedoms" and makes it a point of national pride (then he takes those freedoms from us - go figure).
It's not hard to understand why we are currently so unpopular around the world - they don't hate us, they fear us. We've changed from being the guys in white hats to the world's bully in 60 short years. That scares me too.
Zharkov writes:
@ Eric in New Mexico -- "...you won't have to worry about the price of oil because all the other affected OPEC nations in the region will gladly donate it to us to rid them of Iran's ethical infants. Besides, we're already there. Cost in dollars isn't the issue..."
You are joking, of course. Frankly Eric, the U.S. government shouldn't give a damn whether Iran's voters vote once, twice, or three times, and that wasn't cited by Bush as the reason to bomb Iran. Neither do the governments of Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, or any others care about the voting irregularity in Iran. They also don't care whether Ron Paul votes were ignored by vote counters in New Hampshire or are tainted by fraud, and apparently neither does our federal government. No Middle Eastern leaders publicly complained about voting irregularities in Saddam's regime either.
The Saudis now contribute nothing to the petroleum cost to America of the Iraq War and would likely contribute nothing to liberate Iran from its elected representatives. If you are hoping for an OPEC contribution to your favorite charity, America's military-industrial complex, it isn't happening. If you've noticed, the price of oil has gone up, not down. How's that for gratitude?
Cost is always the issue. U.S. taxpayers did not voluntarily donate tax dollars to liberate the Middle East. The U.S. Constitution lists all of the functions of the federal government and nation-building in foreign countries isn't on the list. Remaking the world in our image by military force is a dumb idea even if it was constitutional, which it isn't. The ideal policy is to lead by example rather than at gunpoint. Other nations should want to emulate America's government, not because they are ordered to do so, but because it's better than what they have. This "leading by example" can't happen when people are busy dodging bombs and searching for food, or are insulted for a less than perfect effort.
America's image isn't enhanced by bombing countries without any official declaration of war. There have been, in the past, a number of arrest warrants issued for CIA employees, Donald Rumsfeld, and others, from courts in Germany, Italy, and France, and a few assorted pending applications for war crimes prosecutions against our present and past government leaders, so one could presume that the rest of the world does not agree with you that it is America's burden to free the oppressed at any cost.
The Ayatollah's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz was issued as a threat of retaliation in the event American forces bombed them, so your belief that they would do so without provocation is erroneous. The time to bomb Iran was the moment they took hostages, in 1979. The time to remove the Ayatollahs was when Khomeini returned to Iran, a return supported by the Carter Administration.
America's democracy isn't the only form of democracy and it certainly isn't America's obligation to spread it across the planet. If the British felt the same way, we would still be fighting the American Revolutionary War with them. When Iran is ready for liberation, its people will do so - it's not as if they've forgotten how - remember Mossadegh? The Shah? They've done it before and they can do it again - when they want to. As far as the "will of the people" is concerned, they've got plenty of that, no matter how many times they vote.
Joe in Tennessee writes:
It's obvious that there is a great deal of misunderstandinginvolved in the actual policies of America and Democracy in general.
In Afghanistan, the nomadic tribal culture visualizes Democracy as the freedom to wonder, not work as a collective and maintain distance from the leadership there as the core of its beliefs. This is rather like an ostrich sticking its head in the sand, as in Iraq. Therealization that they have mutual dictatorial enemies who would gladly seize the opportunity to take control of their rightful resources as labor and oil toinstill an infrastructure which does not give back to the citizen as acollective.
With Fanaticism, though accepted in a Democracy in voice, there are both Natural Law and Mandated law limitations. This provides the privilege of view to extremes, but limits any violence associated to it.
The only facts I see correct in any presumptuous or naivete understanding of Policy is related to the past: If the Congress would have let GW Bush go in when he wanted, we would have circumvented the Middle East crisis. Carter is an example of handing out the olive branch to evil. No more, no less. It doesn't work and the present Administration is using history of our dealings in the past to correct this as much as possible.
I would like to add this: In parts of Africa, a German company buys up all the water rights andplaces meters on huts, yes huts, charging the poor for water. They could not pay as there is no work. In return for water a period of years they get the deed of trust to their land. The forcible law mandating the meters is govt. instilled, the company comes from a democratic Republic...Who's at fault and why has this situation gone on forover a decade with little or no reporting?
It's more like the Greater Good is getting the tar andfeathers, not those who actually deserve it.
Eric in New Mexico writes:
To Frederick Jones,
Everyone seems so concerned about how the public perceives world leaders that a great disconnect has occurred in the public mindset as to how world leaders perceive them.
To wit, as a world leader respects the individual, they also are worthy of it. Same goes for policy, foreign and domestic.
I speak globally, not nationalistically in this.
As it is soon to be a day in honor of a global thinker, thought I'd pass on a quote for human consumption, assuming there are hearts and minds with ears to hear, and something functioning between them...(chuckle).
"Today there is no longer a choice between violence and nonviolence. It is either nonviolence or nonexistence. I feel that we've got to look at this total thing anew and recognize that we must live together. That the whole world now it is one--not only geographically but it has to become one in terms of brotherly concern. Whether we live in America or Asia or Africa we are all tied in a single garment of destiny and whatever effects one directly, effects one in-directly.
"I'm concerned about living with my conscience and searching for that which is right and that which is true, and I cannot live with the idea of being just a conformist following a path that everybody else follows. And this has happened to us. As I've said in one of my books, so often we live by the philosophy 'Everybody's doing it, it must be alright.' We tend to determine what is right and wrong by taking a sort of Gallup poll of the majority opinion, and I don't think this is the way to get at what is right.
"Arnold Toynbee talks about the creative minority and I think more and more we must have in our world that creative minority that will take a stand for that which conscience tells them is right, even though it brings about criticism and misunderstanding and even abuse."
Excerpted from a 1967 interview of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. by Arnold Michaelis.
-end quote-
Seems Zarkov and I agree on a couple fundamental things:
A. I think we both feel that folks should be free to choose their system of government ( and by inference, overthrow or fundamentally change its behavior).
B. That America bears a burden of responsibility for the kind of world we are witness to today, as well as the world the unborn generations will know in the future.
Anyone who has witnessed the birth of one's child can tell you that yes indeed you create your own reality, the question is what do we wish to create for ourselves as reality on this planet, now and for our children's, and their children's future? Not just in this country, but the world as a whole, as an international vision.
I have to respect the guts to seek change that the President has displayed. If he goes where no President has gone before, I trust we'll lend him a hand in finding that "Undiscovered Country" (global peace). I believe that the parties to the conflicts that are long standing in the Mideast, and Asia should take example from the agreements reached in Bonn and the 2002 Loya Jirga. The parties had a limited time to come to terms and decide Afghanistan's future course. They chose to serve the people's interests first, and work together. The choice to do so given them as a direct result of our being attacked on 9/11 and the help of 410 spec ops and CIA sent by the US to coordinate w/ the Northern Alliance and tribal leaders resulting in the defeat of Taliban and jihadist rule over the Afghan people.
My point to being that we as a nation have a "responsibility to protect" which in some cases makes sovereignty of nations a secondary consideration when populations are at put at risk.
Siddhartha in India may not be aware of the role America played in "stopping the car in time" diplomatically to prevent nuclear war between his country and Pakistan in 2002. A crisis born of a terrorist act.
We've been accused of playing world cop, as a nation. If you ask any officer on any street in the U.S. what his/her least favorite call to get is and they'll more than likely say, "Domestic disputes". This is the only politically correct way I can think to describe the current world situation. If we must play that role, folks need to understand that there's a new sheriff in town, determined to prevent domestic violence among the family of nations.
To "protect and serve" humanity, and ensure the preservation of civilization; of all cultures, and ways of tradition that an individual or nation has the inalienable right to choose for themselves as they see fit. So long as it harms no other individual's, or nation's ability to do so.
With this as our philosophy, as policy, the "undiscovered country" may become reality. This is not a role that should (or can ) be played unilaterally, as it is essentially all nation's task.
Courtney in Georgia writes:
Perhaps the real question is how does America view the rest of the world. A very real case could be made that perhaps America acts as she does because of what she sees around the world. And that perception is very un-cool.
Example? Why does Egypt lead the world in only 2 things - American aid and horrific gender apartheid.
Why can't Greenday do a concert in Gaza? Why can't Fergie do a show in Saudi Arabia? Why does Yemen block transmissions of Playboys the Girls Next Door?
Why can't 22 members of the Arab League (with hundreds of millions ) accept a tolerant, egalitarian society with a penchant for high tech, a free, uncensored press, periodic, transparent elections with a tiny tiny population?
Why tolerate unfree, unhappy (and in Gaza's case) nigh unhinged regimes, militias and 'resistance movements' that constantly act out, fear and mistreat women, either fiddle about with WMD or as rocket rich rejects tend to militarize civilian heavy environments?
They offer only torment to their own people and their neighbors and cannot help but act out to export it.
These regimes should be very concerned what America thinks of them in the New Millennium.
As America gets tired of the creepy masked jihadist, magical Palestinians and their risible rights of return (unlike any refugees ever in history) and intolerant regimes with no free media and a weak literacy rate, it's tough to convince America to compromise on anything just for the off chance she'll get good reviews.
Dr Rice says it best: "The rule of law, limits on state power, free speech, religious liberty, equal justice, property rights, tolerance of difference and respect for women. These values are a source of success for nations across the world and they are the only ideas that can give people a future of modernity with dignity. This will ultimately defeat the ideology of violent extremism."
Ronald in New York writes:
Popularity Contests: How's this for US Foreign Policy popularity:
The U.S. Trade Representative speaks to the member states assembled at the United Nations: "If you don't adopt a free-trade, open-market, democratic system, you will be extinct like the Dinosaurs". A wonderful message... makes you feel proud to be an American...makes you wonder why we are having such a hard time in the world. ...popularity; important? ...you wouldn't think so with that kind of communication of foreign policy.
Guess who made the comment...
Jacqueline in Jordan writes:
I believe that if the US does not make its foreign policy in a way to consider the consequences on other nations, it will only lead to the demise of our influence in global politics. At present I am shocked at the new agreement to provide additional military aid to Israel which uses it against the Palestinians in a way that violates the very principles that the US stands for - under the guise that we are supporting a nation that shares our values. I am a registered voter in New York City, now teaching in Amman, Jordan; my family is Jewish, I have always supported Israel. However, since I have been here working I have been listening to horror stories from Palestinian refugees, and people who have to travel into Israeli occupied territory to see their families, or to do their jobs. There are long lines waiting 24hours daily at the Israeli embassy to get permission to travel, who endure humiliating and abusive treatment. I myself was subjected to such treatment by Israeli airport security when I was returning to Jordan after visiting relatives in Israel - I even had my underwear scanned, and I was interrogated in a frightening manner because I was wearing a Jordanian scarf for the cold weather. Cosmetic items I had purchased at a Kibbutz at the Dead Sea were confiscated and had to be sent in a separate package! I am shocked at the inhumanity of the Israelis to blockade Gaza and prevent fuel, food and medicines in during this extremely cold weather we are enduring in this region. It just makes the people here hate the Israelis even more. Instead of giving more military aid to brutalize the Palestinians to get them to stop shooting missiles into Israel, why doesn't the US give funds to Israel for them to arrive not with tanks and guns and bombers, but additional fuel, food, medicine and help to these impoverished, displaced and desperate people? The current Israeli policy is only creating more enemies daily, and if we support it, more enemies for us as well. I oppose the proposed ten-year agreement between the United States and Israel for $30 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel. This military aid package, amounting to $3 billion per year, represents a 25% increase over the current U.S. annual military aid appropriation to Israel of $2.4billion. Israel is already the largest recipient of U.S. military aid before the proposed increase. Rather than increasing military aid, the United States should sanction Israel by cutting off military aid to it for its continued violations of the U.S. Arms Export Control Act and U.S. Foreign Assistance Acts. The U.S. Arms Export Control Act prohibits foreign countries from using U.S. weapons against civilians or civilian infrastructure and limits their use to' legitimate self-defense' or for 'internal security.' The U.S. Foreign Assistance Act states that 'No assistance may be provided under this part[of the law] to the government of any country which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights'. Rather than use U.S. military aid for 'legitimate self-defense' or 'internal security', Israel relies upon it to prosecute its illegal 40-year old foreign military occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip. 'Gross violations of internationally recognized human rights' against Palestinians living under Israel's illegal military occupation have been well-documented by numerous Palestinian, Israeli, U.S., and international human rights organizations, as well as by the U.S. government. I urge you to take action to uphold the laws of the United States and hold Israel accountable for its violations of U.S. law rather than provide it with additional military aid.
Rachel in Texas writes:
The question is definitely a very provocative one, but I'm glad it's been asked. It seems that most of the comments are ignoring all but recent history, and I believe that's a mistake.
With the close of WWII, America faced a decision that every great nation has had to deal with in the history of the world. America proved herself superior to every other nation in the world economically, technologically, and in fighting force. The regimes of Cyrus II, Alexander, Caesar, Napoleon, or Victorian Great Britain saw the opportunity and had the capability to conquer.
Like those mentioned, the world was ours for the taking. Especially with the power of the atom bomb to enforce our demands.
Yet we said no and chose to assist Europe and Asia and Africa with their rebuilding processes.
We respected the national sovereignty of each nation and refused to control their internal affairs. In fact, we tried to prevent Russia and China from taking advantage of weaker nations and established NATO.
[Ironically, the nations of Europe who received the most of our help nearly sixty years ago (a very brief span of history for Europe) would rather criticize our efforts than help out.]
The reason we said no is because America was never built to become an empire. In fact, it's against our very nature to do so. There was a HUGE debate over the acquisition of Louisiana because the people of that territory did not have a say in the matter. The same debate reappeared during the Spanish-American war, and whether America should retain the spoils of the victor. Our philosophy of government is based upon the principle of "the consent of the governed." As long as this remains the basis of our system of government, we will never attempt to conquer and control.
Now to the present day. There are three very important things that must be understood.
1) We've fought this type of battle before.
2) this isn't the first time we've been unpopular
3) unpopularity does not mean that we're wrong.
For the first point, I refer back to the war we engaged in with the Barbary powers. For decades, these pirates roamed their corner of the globe and preyed upon cargo ships passing through the water they claimed as theirs. The crew were captured and either enslaved or sold for ransom to the country of their origin. With the exception of Britain, all other nations were in favor of simply paying the ransom. President Jefferson, however, chose to change that policy, and Britain was the only other nation to stand with us. We fought that battle with three countries [Algiers, Tripoli, & Tunis.]
The second & third points are quite self-explanatory. The reason we feel it so much in the present, however, is because communications have become infinitely more global. With the globalization of our communications, the individual citizens of world nations submit their opinions on someone else's philosophy of government without realizing that each nation is individually different. European nations tend to lump together because their boundaries, citizens, and governments have been so very fluid over the last three hundred years. Europe's never really understood the "American Experiment" and likely never will.
So as a direct answer to the question, US popularity shouldn't matter and while it's important to know foreign policy implications, the popularity issue alone shouldn't be a deciding factor to changes in our foreign policy.
Zharkov writes:
For those who read the news -
OPEC is not interested in our "War On Terror" or State Department angst over U.S. policies.
OPEC is busy bankrupting America.
We sacrifice our future while OPEC cheers us on into economic oblivion. Very nice.
ABU DHABI (Reuters) - OPEC dismissed further calls to boost oil output from top consumer the United States, saying the global market is well supplied and the producer group has little control over oil prices near $90 a barrel.
U.S. Energy Secretary Sam Bodman on Saturday urged top exporter Saudi Arabia and OPEC to raise supply on a visit to the kingdom. His appeal came just days after President George W. Bush asked the group for more oil on a separate visit to Riyadh, and less than two weeks before OPEC's next meeting on February 1.
"I don't think there is a need to increase because the market is well supplied," Oil Minister Abdullah al-Attiyah told reporters on the sidelines of a conference in Abu Dhabi on Sunday.


text:
Food Network Magazine created these recipes using 12 to 16 cups freshly popped popcorn. Use a bag or two of microwave popcorn, or make your own: Heat a few kernels in 1/4 cup vegetable oil in a large pot over medium heat until one pops. Add 3/4 cup kernels and cover the pot. Cook, shaking the pot occasionally, until the popping subsides.
1. Brown Butter–Lemon Cook 6 tablespoons butter in a skillet over medium heat until browned, about 7 minutes. Remove from the heat and stir in 1 1/2 teaspoons grated lemon zest; drizzle over 16 cups hot popcorn. Toss with 2 teaspoons kosher salt.
2. Ranch Melt 4 tablespoons butter with a 1-ounce packet ranch seasoning mix; toss with 16 cups hot popcorn and 2 tablespoons chopped chives. Season with salt.
3. Garlic-Herb Melt 4 tablespoons butter in a saucepan; add 4 grated garlic cloves and 1 teaspoon each finely chopped fresh rosemary, sage and thyme and cook1 minute. Drizzle over 16 cups hot popcorn and toss with 2 teaspoons kosher salt.
4. Parmesan-Rosemary Toss 16 cups hot popcorn with 1/2 cup grated parmesan, 3 tablespoons olive oil, 1 tablespoon finely chopped fresh rosemary and 2 teaspoons kosher salt.
5. Frito Pie Toss 12 cups hot popcorn, 6 tablespoons melted butter, 4 cups Fritos (or other corn chips) and 2 tablespoons chili powder; spread on baking sheets. Top with 2 cups shredded cheddar and 2 chopped scallions. Bake at 350 degrees F until the cheese melts, 3 minutes. Season with salt.
6. Truffle Toss 16 cups hot popcorn with 6 tablespoons melted butter, 1 1/2 tablespoons truffle oil, 1/4 cup grated parmesan, 1 teaspoon kosher salt and 1/2 teaspoon pepper.
7. Movie Theater Melt 1 stick butter in a small saucepan over low heat, skimming off the foam and solids; drizzle over 16 cups hot popcorn and toss with 2 teaspoons kosher salt.
8. Veggie Pulse 2 cups each mixed veggie chips and dehydrated snap peas in a food processor until powdery; toss with 8 cups hot popcorn and 2 cups each veggie chips and dehydrated snap peas. Season with salt.
9. Three-Cheese Toss 16 cups hot popcorn with 2 cups shredded cheddar, 1 cup grated parmesan and 1/2 cup grated pecorino; spread on baking sheets. Bake at 350 degrees F until the cheddar melts, 3 minutes. Season with salt.
10. Gruyere-Porcini Pulse 1/2 cup dried porcini mushrooms in a spice grinder until powdery. Add 2 tablespoons chopped fresh parsley and 1 1/2 teaspoons kosher salt; pulse again until powdery. Drizzle 6 tablespoons melted butter over 16 cups hot popcorn; toss with the porcini powder and 1 cup finely grated gruyere.


text:
To get details of Answer Keys of Geography please fill the form below:
[easy_contact_forms fid=12]
As we all know that UGC Conducts NET (National Eligibility Test) twice a year in the months of June & December. The last exam conducted by UGC was held on 30 June 2013 by 79 coordinating universities.
The UGC NET JRF 2013 Exam for Geography was successfully held in two sessions:
First Session: 09.00 AM to 12.00 PM
Second Session: 02.00 PM to 05.00 PM
As per information around 9.2 lacks candidates has given the University Grants Commission (UGC) National Eligibility Test for JRF 2013. Candidates are very curious to get the UGC NET JRF June 2013 Answer Keys for Geography. UGC will publish the answer key for Geography as soon as possible on the official web portal. After the UGC NET 2013 exam Candidates are looking for the answer key of Geography on the internet.
The UGC officially announced that UGC NET JRF JUNE 2013 answer key for Geography in few upcoming days on the official portal of UGC.
Candidates need the answer keys of Geography to analyze their performance in the exam and calculate their marks. Candidates will estimate their score using the UGC NET JRF JUNE 2013 answer key. Candidates can get the answer keys very soon on the official website.
UGC will be uploaded the UGC NET JRF JUNE 2013 answer key subject wise on the official web portal www.ugcnetonline.in.
But Astral Education, being India's No. 1 Institute for UGC NET Coaching will try its best to provide you with the answer keys of UGC NET / JRF June 2013 at the earliest possible through its official website http://www.UgcNetCoaching.com


text:
hey kids, gather round, here comes captain santa to share your dreams!
Good easy-going pop that is very well made and interesting. She has a good voice, and is overall a great listening experience.
Awesome! Both albums without vocals! It really reveals some added flourishes from those heavy arrangements that make them so great!
Another thrown together corporate Christmas album. It's got some good people on it, probably only worth it for the few artists you actually care about.
Further Seems Forever
Penny Black
I've been a Dashboard Confessional fan for a long time, but never got into Further Seems Forever. I was happy to see Chris Carraba was back for vocals, but musically, it is just a bit much and really lacked any melodic appeal.
Great to hear from this band. More of the soft vocals and interesting song styling they are known for.
A rocky, gritty explosion of garagey rock that is a lot of fun. It doesn't take itself too seriously, and stays on a solid path all the way through.
Excellent! This pseudo-side project of Tally Hall members is an eclectic mix of songs that go from retro to pop to electronic, etc. I really liked it, and think it will even grow on me.
Filed under: Reviews Tagged: | adrienne pierce, ミラクルミュージカル, cardinal, further seems forever, jellyfish, swearin', tally hall


text:
Hello TeaFriends!!
I am after a small kyusu! Pre-loved would be preferable as I don't have much cash to burn at the moment. Would prefer something under 100ml but 100-120 would also be ok
side note: If anyone knows where I can buy the small one thats on rishi and dens tea like this: http://tinyurl.com/a2dj4jo (which are both sold out) elsewhere, I'd appreciate that also!
Thank you!


text:
The Breidenbacher Hof, A Capella Hotel has been open for more than 5 years and it is great to see how many guests we've had the opportunity to serve during this time. Every day we start our day with the mission to make our guests feel at home and to create a stay they will always remember. We are not just doing this for them, but also for ourselves, because making other people smile is our passion. Last week we again had a wonderful opportunity to create a special Capella experience for our guests and I was really excited to be part of it!
And this is how it began: We received a message that a regular guest would be once again visiting. Everyone tried to come up with something unique that would suit this guest perfectly. After many suggestions, our General Manager Cyrus had a wonderful idea: A boat trip down the Rhine! This was perfect, as it would allow the guest, who's seen the city many times, to experience Dusseldorf from a whole new vantage point.
When the guest arrived and heard the plans he was very excited. Cyrus agreed to join him and the two set sail on a beautiful day. The view from the river is picturesque and it was the perfect way to relax – both for the guest and Cyrus! Then the most amazing thing happened: the captain overheard the guest speaking in a foreign language. Apparently he recognized it and without a word the Captain switched the music to that of the language he just heard. Can you imagine how surprised our guest and of course also our General Manager were?! The guest was quite touched by the gesture and thanked the Captain profusely.
After the trip the guest again expressed his gratitude both to Cyrus and the Breidenbacher Hof team as well as the boat's Captain. This was an experience neither the guest nor Cyrus would soon forget!


text:
13406 E. Philadelphia St. Whittier, CA 90608
Students interested in green living knew sociology professor sal johnston would be a key ally to lead the charge on campus. Working together, students and faculty aimed to transform Wanberg residence halls into a ''learning laboratory and social experiment'' for sustainability. Residents there live the ideals they learn in class – monitoring energy and water usage and tending the organic vegetable garden out front. This garden is known as the Sustainable Urban Farm (SUrF) Lab and prompted the start of the Urban Agricultural Club. And now, Wanberg Hall has a new nickname..."Greenberg.''
Watch a video about Whittier's "campus farmers."
Natalie's Story
"I love music, but besides high school band and singing in the shower, that's as far as my music career had gone . . . until my Whittier Scholars project."
Read more
Travis' Story
"Combining physics and football? Well, I do say 'the harder you hit someone, the less it hurts you and the more it hurts them.' I suppose that relates to the topic of momentum and (in)elastic collisions."
Read more
Deyla's Story
"When I stepped off the plane in Geneva, all I knew was that I had a hotel booked for the first four nights and my apartment wasn't going to be ready for three whole weeks."
Read more


text:
Intended Audience:
Non-attorneys (No CLE) may register for the 8 dinner meetings above as "Law Office Staff" for $150
Location: Nelson Levine de Luca & Hamilton, One Battery Park Plaza, 32nd Floor
Course ID: C09252013
Credits: 1.5 NJ Credit per meeting1.5 NY Credit per meeting
Course Description:
Join NYCLA's Insurance Law Committee for a series of 8 dinner/CLE meetings -- PLUS the Insurance Law Committee's Christmas Party for the low price of $250.
By popular demand, this year, in addition to having dinner meetings, as before, we will provide CLE credits for each substantive meeting (1.5 NY and/or NJ credits per meeting).
The first program will be Wednesday Evening, September 25 on the Insurance Exchanges Under the Affordable Care Act, which are schedule to open on October 1 of this year. We are fortunate to have two experts on this issue: Jack Meyer and Barbara Smith of Health Management Associates (HMA) in Washington D.C. Jack Meyer, HMA's Managing Principal, is a healthcare economist specializing in the planning and design of health insurance exchanges. Barbara Smith was formerly policy coordinator for the Exchanges, leading Health and Human Services (HHS) in developing Exchanges in half the country.
Time permitting, we will also discuss many other important regulatory developmentsthat occurred over the Summer – national and international.
NOTE: The meetings will be held at Nelson Levine de Luca & Hamilton, One Battery Park Plaza, 32nd Floor.


text:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Any idea why his menu is expanding? He was the definition of a purist.
what were his prices like in NY anyone remember?
I definitely remember a price increase at the NYC UPN right at the end of his run there. Im pretty sure he had raised his prices to $22 or $23.
Yes, I ate there just before he moved. I forget the price, but it was over $20.
I was actually quite happy to pay it after having a bunch of "fakapolitans" in other spots. Things are way better in the new york area these days, thats for sure.


text:
Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops)
Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) The Product Review:Tabla Studio v2.0 (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) is a Collection of 50 high resolution (24 bit 96 Khz), hand played Tabla Loops for Dadra Taal for Music Composition and Tabla Accompaniment.
1. All Tabla Loops are creative and include popular rhythms.
2. Good for Folk and Classical Music Composition and Accompaniment.
3. Loops are in varying Tempos, slow, medium and fast.
4. High Quality Tabla is used by professional Tabla Players.
5. Loops can be modified for Key and Tempo.
6. Each Loop comes in a separate WAV file.
1. The Loops in Tabla Studio v2.0 are in WAV format. They are compatible with almost all Major Recording and Editing Softwares and Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs).
2. Compatible with PC and Mac Computer Systems and iPad
3. Compatible with Hardwares like AKAI MPC's, Korg Triton, Roland, Casio and all other keyboards that can import .WAV files
4. Compatible with all Musical Keyboards which can import WAV files.
5. All Loops can be converted into Apple Loop Format (AIFF)
(All Loops are also available in Apple Loop Format AIFF as Free Download on request.)
6. All Loops are also available at WAV 16 bit 44.1 Khz sampling rate on request.
(Some Hardwares like Musical Keyboards accept WAV files at 16 bit 44.1 Khz sampling rate only, in that case you can download free Tabla Loops in WAV format at 16 bit 44.1 Khz sampling rate on request. Please mail to firstname.lastname@example.com for free download.)
You can check the Samples at www.TablaRadio.Com
Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) is the product proudly presented to we by RegNow Vendor Software:Audio:Music Creation. You can find out some-more about Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) website: Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops).
If you have no examination nonetheless from a users, it can be probable which this revolutionary product is completely new. If we have experience right before with all the products achievable Vendor Software:Audio:Music Creation , we're going to serve this village by withdrawal a reputable comment.
Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops)! Money Back Guarantee
Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) is agreeable underneath ClickBanks Refund Policy. It is settled during RegNow site.
Our lapse process for all RegNow products is as follows:
You can try Get Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) during 100% RISK-FREE. If after the squeeze we have been not confident with the calm of this product or whatsoever reasons , we can emanate the Without-Questions-Asked-Refund inside of 60 days of your purchase. There is no RISK in perplexing out Get Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops).
Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) WebSite Preview
Click Here To Get Tabla Studio (Kaharwa Tabla Loops) Original Page
Rating: 10 out of 10 (from 15 votes)
This entry was posted by hamdouch on July 18, 2013 at 10:02 pm, and is filed under Last Product Review. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0.Both comments and pings are currently closed.


text:
State, county rank poorly in birth report
ESCANABA – A report released Wednesday by the Michigan League for Public Policy suggests Michigan compares poorly with other states in areas like births to teen mothers and pre-term birth rates.
The report analyzes factors of maternal and infant well-being within the state's 54 Great Start Collaboratives. Each collaborative brings together a variety of organizations to prepare children up to five years of age to enter the school system and for success later in life.
"We are focusing on making sustainable changes in our communities to benefit young children and their families," said Tara Weaver, director of the Delta-Schoolcraft Great Start Collaborative. "It is our goal to give our children the best possible start in life. This is a community effort, an investment in the future."
In the report, the Great Start Collabortives were organized into three tiers, each composed of 18 collaboratives. Both the Menominee and Delta-Schoolcraft Great Start Collabortives were in the middle tier, ranking 21st and 36th in the state respectively.
Also included in the report were state averages. In 2011, 115,395 babies were born in Michigan. Of those births, 44.8 percent were to uninsured, low-income women and 12,263 were born pre-term – prior to 37 weeks.
In the Menominee Great Start Collaborative 200 babies were born. Fifteen were born pre-term – 7.5 percent, tying it with the Midland Great Start Collaborative for the lowest rate in Michigan – and 26.2 percent were born to uninsured, low-income women.
In the Delta-Schoolcraft Great Start Collaborative, 446 babies were born between 2009 and 2011 with 49.8 percent being born to uninsured, low-income women. Forty-eight were born pre-term.
With more than 10 percent of babies being born pre-term in Delta County, Public Health of Delta & Menominee Counties is working to reduce the rate through programs like WIC and the new Maternal Infant Health Program, which promotes healthy pregnancies for mothers on Medicaid.
"We're hoping that this new program is going to help reduce the number of pre-term births," said Debbie Poquette, director of nursing at PHDM, adding that women who need to have their pregnancies verified for Medicaid eligibility can be verified by PHDM.
The PHDM programs work in tandem to promote healthy, full-term pregnancies.
"For all our programs we stress folic acid and the cessation of smoking," said Carrie Polley, WIC coordinator for PHDM.
The Delta-Schoolcraft Great Start Collaborative also ranked 47th out of the 54 collaboratives in the state when it came to smoking during pregnancy – with 31.2 percent of mothers smoking while pregnant. On average in Michigan, 19 percent of mothers who gave birth between 2009 and 2011 smoked while pregnant.
"In our last strategic plan, smoking during pregnancy was part of the plan, but we broadened that in our new strategic plan to include kids that are born addicted to controlled substances," said Weaver.
Weaver added while there is no tracking system to monitor the number of babies born with addictions to controlled substances, the initiative had received a number referrals suggesting controlled substances were an area of concern for the Delta-Schoolcraft collaborative.
The Delta-Schoolcraft Great Start Collaborative ranked 42nd in the state for the number of repeat teen pregnancies. Nineteen percent of teen pregnancies were to teens who were already parents.
"The rates were very stable in Delta and Menominee counties and without our Public Health programs, our rates would be higher," said Poquette.
As a whole, Michigan ranked 31st in the nation for pre-term births in 2010, with 12 percent of all babies born being delivered before 37 weeks. Michigan also ranked 30th in births to teens (10 percent of births), 20th in births to teens who were already mothers (17 percent of births to teen mothers), 28th in births to unmarried women (42 percent of births), and 30th in low birth weight babies (8.4 percent of babies born).
In almost two-thirds of births to unmarried couples the parents were living together at the time the child was born. However, these couples are three times more likely to be separated by the time the child is five years old.
In addition, the rising age of first marriage has led to the median age for first birth occurring before the average age of first marriage. By 2010, 58 percent of first births for women in their 20s were to unmarried women.
Currently, 80 percent of American women between the ages of 20 and 24 are unmarried, as are half of women in their older 20s. Just over 42 percent of births in Michigan are to single mothers.


text:
John Gerson, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
215 Katonah Avenue, Katonah, New York 10536
I am a New York State Licensed Psychologist, and bring my expertise to bear on a wide breadth of life issues, including personal distress, marriage and family problems, separation and divorce, health and fitness, grief and loss, and relationships of all kinds - parent-child, heterosexual, gay, lesbian and bisexual. My approach is eclectic, and draws on psychodynamic, humanistic, relational and systems theory understanding. Learn more about my practice at www.ThriveTherapydoc.com.


text:
August 24, 2009 WIC Update
SUBJECT 1: New Medical Documentation Form (WIC 27)
SUBJECT 2: New Food Package Food Prescription Conversion - Scheduled for October 1, 2009
SUBJECT 3: New Food Packages Dollar Values
SUBJECT 4: Fit WIC MO FY09 Evaluation
SUBJECT 5: Labor Day Holiday – September 7, 2009
SUBJECT 6: Missouri Voter Registration Application Forms (WIC-MVR-1)
SUBJECT 7: Food & Formula Reference Guide (FFRG) - Effective October 1, 2009
SUBJECT 8: Missouri WIC Approved Food Poster (11" x 17", Laminated)
SUBJECT 9: Photos of the new WIC Food Packages and Approved Foods
SUBJECT 10: H1N1 Priority Vaccination List
- New Medical Documentation Form (WIC 27): The state office has posted the approved Medical Documentation form (WIC 27) on the web. Agencies will start using this approved form on October 1, 2009. LWPs will need to print off the form until the forms are printed and available in the warehouse. The form can be provided to participants (women, infants or children) who will need a new medical form starting in October and can be used to train LWP staff and health care providers. The new form number is WIC 27 and replaces the WIC 29. The form can be found at:
Food Packages. Please discard the old WIC 29 forms on October 1, 2009. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact D'Anne Ward at 1-800-392-8209 or email firstname.lastname@example.com.
- New Food Package Food Prescription Conversion - Scheduled for October 1, 2009: The state office has contracted with CSC Covansys to assist with the new food package conversion in MOWINS. The conversion is scheduled for Thursday, October 1, 2009. The conversion will consist of the following:
- All future food prescription for all participants in an active certification period will be deleted.
- The conversion will establish a default food prescription for all children, prenatal and non-breastfeeding women. The default food prescription will be the milk/cheese combination as well as the other food items for the participant's category.
- The state will provide the LWP a report for women and children who were receiving food package III (special formulas/medical food). The report will be posted on the Crystal report website early in September. The participant's records listed in this report will require the CPA to establish a food prescription before FI's could be printed.
- All infant and breastfeeding women's records will need to have a food prescription established before FI's can be printed.
LWPs may access MOWINS as early as 5 am on Thursday, October 1st to download the installation of the new food package release. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact your district technical assistance (TA) team.
- New Food Packages Food Dollar Values: In addition to reflecting the most recent dietary guidelines, changes to the New Food Packages include providing additional food to mothers and infants as an incentive to encourage exclusive breastfeeding. Agencies have requested information on the dollar value of the different food packages to use as a tool to promote the Fully Breastfeeding Food Package. The following monthly food costs are based on statewide averages:
Women's Food Packages Fully Breastfeeding Food Package $80 Partially Breastfeeding Food Package $60 Non-Breastfeeding Food Package $50 Infant Foods Cereal, infant fruits/vegetables (64 jars) and infant meats (31 jars) - fully breastfed infant $75 Cereal and infant fruits/vegetables (32 jars) - all other infants $27
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact your district technical assistance (TA) team.
- Fit WIC MO FY09 Evaluation: We are nearing the end of our third year of statewide implementation of Fit WIC Missouri, a program to prevent childhood overweight in the WIC community. Each local WIC provider that participated in Fit WIC MO in FY09 is asked to complete the attached Evaluation (Table 8). Any agency that wrote a goal, objective, strategy or activity in the FY09 LAP should complete the evaluation. On the attached form, simply check the nutrition and physical activity goals that your agency selected in FY09, report how many participants selected each goal and how many were successful at making the behavior change. Then check which activity to support WIC staff or which community activity your agency selected, and give a brief report of the results. A few open-ended questions give you the opportunity to tell us what is working well for you and what barriers you are experiencing as you implement Fit WIC MO. Return this electronically to Rita Arni at email@example.com no later than September 30, 2009.
- Labor Day Holiday – September 7, 2009: The State WIC Office, including the MOWINS Help Desk, will be closed on Monday, September 7, 2009.
If you have questions, contact Mark Davis at email@example.com or 573-526-5323 or 800-392-8209.
- Missouri Voter Registration Application Forms (WIC-MVR-1): The Missouri Voter Registration Application Forms are available at the DHSS warehouse. If your agency needs the forms, please fill out the WIC Supply Request Form (WIC 8) and fax to 573-751-1574. Your agency can order the forms as needed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Takako Tagami at firstname.lastname@example.com.
- Food & Formula Reference Guide (FFRG) - Effective October 1, 2009: FFRG (Effective October 1, 2009) is being finalized. It will be posted on the website on September 1, 2009. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Takako Tagami at email@example.com.
- Missouri WIC Approved Food Poster (11" x 17", Laminated): On August 21, 2009, the State office shipped the Missouri WIC New Approved Food Poster (11" x 17", Laminated) to local WIC providers who requested the poster. Shipment of the remaining posters (8.5" x 11", Laminated and 8.5 x 11" & 11" x 17" Foam board mounted) will be on September 1, 2009. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Takako Tagami at firstname.lastname@example.com.
- Photos of the new WIC Food Packages and Approved Foods: Photos of the new WIC food packages and approved foods are available for local WIC provider's use through the website.
If you have any suggestions and/or questions, please feel free to contact Takako Tagami at firstname.lastname@example.com.
- H1N1 Priority Vaccination List: The following is the current priority list for H1N1 vaccination. As you can see, the WIC populations fit at least two of the priority categories.
- Pregnant women because they are at higher risk of complications and can potentially provide protection to infants who cannot be vaccinated;
- Household contacts and caregivers for children younger than 6 months of age because younger infants are at higher risk of influenza-related complications and cannot be vaccinated. Vaccination of those in close contact with infants less than 6 months old might help protect infants by "cocooning" them from the virus;
- Healthcare and emergency medical services personnel because infections among healthcare workers have been reported and this can be a potential source of infection for vulnerable patients. Also, increased absenteeism in this population could reduce healthcare system capacity;
- All people from 6 months through 24 years of age
- Children from 6 months through 18 years of age because we have seen many cases of novel H1N1 influenza in children and they are in close contact with each other in school and day care settings, which increases the likelihood of disease spread, and
- Young adults 19 through 24 years of age because we have seen many cases of novel H1N1 influenza in these healthy young adults and they often live, work, and study in close proximity, and they are a frequently mobile population; and,
- Persons aged 25 through 64 years who have health conditions associated with higher risk of medical complications from influenza.
Fit WIC Evaluation FFY09


text:
Thanks for helping us sort this video!
Thanks for helping us associate the correct Pornstars to this video!
Hilf uns: Erscheint dieser Pornostar in diesem Video?
Pornstar Name:
Im disturbed by this guys speedo tan line.
I would love to find a bf to clean me up after he fills my pussy with his cum, I would have multiple orgasms...so damn hot...
Just make him do it
Enter Reply
I always like the cum out of my wife if it is from me or any other guy that she decides to fuck, she comes home after a night of being out with her friends and her pussy is usually loaded full of spunk and I lick her all of it out, till there is non left then I get to fuck her.
My wife does the same. She comes home and kisses me and asks me if I can taste the other guy's cock. Then she'll sit on my face and tell me how big he was and how I should have been there to suck him dry.
Unlike Ivan, I prefer the scent and taste after about 12 hours since insemination. The vagina does an amazing job of flavoring seminal fluid.
I would only do that if the other guy was present and the cum fresh
hotmale- let's schedule THAT double date! I would love to lick your cum from a nice pussy....or even directly from your cock.
I would love to do that except keep my wad in my mouth and then share it with a deep kiss with my woman. Mmmmmm.
So sexy. As a woman, I'm shocked a man would do that. But that was what pushed me over. Cream pies are hot, but having him lick it up? Oh man, I would love to enjoy him!
I wood be eating your cum so nice bab my wife will not let me eat her cum
my fantasy is to watch my wife get fucked by a BBC and then do creampie cleanup. until that happens, I do what this guy did.
I love creampies there is nothing better then eating a pussy of someone you love after she had sex with
Now that was one of the hottest fucking scenes I have watched here yet...beautiful vagina being fucked by a hot cock...and then watching him savor his own load made me have to blow one of my own...Bravo...do MORE!!!
I've tried so hard to get my husband to clean me up and he just won't do it. :(
I love to do clean ups.
I always wanted agirlfriend who let me suck. Cum out of her Pusey Ass.I cumin visit do u.an suck yourhusbands cock
I will be thriiled let me no when
After I cum in your pussy, I would be willing to lick my cum from it and then French kiss you so we can both have the pleasure of sharing one of the most intimate parts of sexual unity. I would be willing to French kiss your pussy as a part of foreplay to get you in the mood for what comes after. You are sexy and desirable and my cock would enjoy the feeling of your pussy as you cum.
I love the taste of my sperm in combination with my gf juices right out of her delicious tight shaved pussy-it always makes her come like hell
He has a great looking cock.
I would love to rim his asshole when he is fucking my wife
I like to lick cum off my wife's cunt.not mine all the time,but another guys cum taste so good on my wife's wet cunt.i also like to lick and suck the guys cum from his cock.
I would love to eat his cum out of her gorgous pussy. You 2 are such a fantasy for me.
Wow! maybe if i had a girl willing to do it!
A pal asked me to join in a threesome with him and his gf. Wow she was gorgeous and as he withdrew after fucking her and filling her up with sperm it was my turn but instead of immediately inserting my rock hard throbbing cock I went down on her, licking and sucking her beautiful dripping pussy, the taste of mixed juices was intoxicating and it made the girl squirt uncontrollably for quite some time and then I slide up her slippery hole and fucked her like I had never fucked a girl before. Since that night we have had several threesome and my pal loves nothing better than sloppy seconds.
I want my husband to watch Another man fuck me and cum hard in me filling me up sooooo much then I want hubby to spread my legs, play with the sticky white cum as it dribbles out and lick the other mans cum out of my cunt. Eating it up, while he wanks his cock. I want him to lick my cummy clit too, until I cum on his face. Then when I say so he can fuck my cummy cunt fucking the other guys cum deep inside me until he unload in my cunt . Mmmm Fuck yeah.
Damn this is hot. Let me join next time
That woman is incredible. There are a whole lotta people (male and female) that would love to eat her pussy after watching him fuck her.
me encanta mi esposa cuando ese 69 com mi amigo yo me cerco cuando esta mamando su berga y me besa y los dos saboriamos sus jugos
That woman is incredible. There are a whole lotta people (male and female) that would love to eat her pussy after watching him fuck her. Loved to hear her moaning, then that creampie. I wanted to lick that guys' dick clean then start on her. My gf loves me eating my cum from her pussy. She gets so hot knowing I am going to fuck her and suck my cum back in my mouth. She will come 2 or 3 times if we have a threesome and eat all the cum after we both fuck her. We would like to see more also.
I like eating my cum off my wifes pussy.i like eat another guys cum off her pussy,we both like having sex with other men.i like sucking a mans cock and having his cum in my mouth.i love eating warm thick cum.
They are great. I would clean the cum from his cock and her pussy.
I have eaten so much cum from my mate´s big cock that I want now to lick it out of my wife´s pussy. I know the taste and love it.
That's precisely what I am doing for years since our wedding up to now : my wife and me always enjoy I clean up her creampied pussy. I am proud and never ashamed to do the same in public when several other males are cumming in my cute wife's vagina during gangbangs. Always sharing then swallowing all the loads my wife enjoys to receive is an additional must for both of us. I wrote nearly similar comment on March 2, 2013.
I loved to eat my gf´s bull´s creampies as a punishment for having a small dick. He always cummed in her pussy
I love it. Would like to watch my wife get fucked by another guy and eat his cum out of her pussy. Then I get to fuck her and eat my own cum as well, bringing her to an orgasm.
we did this on friday after a night out, i asked my wife what she wanted and she said for me to fuck her and shot my cum over her pussy which i did then went down and licked her till she came ,she want to suck another cock together while we were french kissing so we could swop cum in our mouth. next morning i fucked her again and filled her up again. then we fucked on the kitchen chair with her sitting on my cock then she turned around so i could fuck her from behind. i watched my cock going in and out,she loves to be pulled apart so her pussy is on show we had 3somes before but not for a long time but i think we need to do it again as we both love it. she would love to make me watch her get fucked and fill with cum and then make me lick it from her pussy
sucking cum from a hot cunt is great fun. Especially when you are down there eating her out as he cums in her! Of course his cock might "accidentally" slip into my mouth too but who cares? I'll suck his cock and her cunt and eat all the cum from both of them anytime they want!
I would lick you cum from your cock and your gfs pussy as you cum over her i bet you would both like that
Stu With U on that, my pals cum tastes so much better than mine, straight from my gf's pussy or when I suck his cock
im licking the cum from my cock while watching this its so hot,i love licking my cum out of my wifes pussy even better when its my mate cum
squirt, squirt, slurp, slurp, YUM, YUM!!!!
I'm a highly sexual 41 year old woman and Damn... this video is a major turn on for me... I love to make myself cum watching this! Joey...I love the close up shots of your beautiful cock and the sounds you make.... the sound of the bed.. all of it! So hot... I'll start the video over at about the 1:45 mark...over and over as I fuck my pussy with a dildo imagining it's your cock... I love to see the head of your cock as it goes in and out...and watch your balls moving It's such a turn on when you cum... the way you moan... saying oh my God.. is so fucking sexy.....and your cock covered in your hot cum.. as your cock slides out of her pussy....you back up on your knees to look at your hot load in her pussy...but my eyes stay glued on your sticky hot cock in the background... that is so sexy to me... and that's ususally when I end up cumming! A man eating his own load from his wife/girlfriends pussy...is hot and erotic.... naughty and yummy and I love it!!!
I wish I knew you right now!
that's disgusting...1 star
what about bryan fuck each others partner then kepp them and clean each others spunk out of them while they sit on our faces .
now thats a good boy. i love a guy willing to clean up his own mess
i love to do this with my wife
Hey "Grapesmuggler"...I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that you have a flabby white ass. If you had an ass like Joey, you'd show it off too. You're just jealous! Hit the gym buddy...
This is the ultimate joy, I love sticking my tongue as deep in my womans cunt as I can and licking my cum out. there is something primal about it.
Hey "Grapesmuggler"...focus on the GIRL! You know that if you can't take your eyes off the guy, you probably need to just admit you're gay and leave the straight porn to us.
what a wet pussy, i always suck my wifes pussy clean after i cum in her ,i love the taste of my spunk even better when she gets fucked by strangers,five of my mates fucked her last night and what a load of cum i swallowed so good
I love the man's bikini butt tan line
I so want a guy to eat his own cum out of me
Hannah I'd love to do this, just need the right person.
Eating creampies is a favorite..Love eating my wifes after a gangbang
I want to do that really badly, except I would eat her pussy better sucking and messaging her clit with my lips and tongue. I would also get deep in her pussy to clean up all of my seed for her!
nothing hotter than eating out a pussy filled with cum your own or another guy,
Damn thats awesome hes eating his own cum!! I love it !
I would soooooooo love this but can't find a willing man!
my pole is so long and hard right now, i'd fuck your cunt and eat it
damn i wanta tastse her pussy his cum and all
Gross!!!! This turns me off!!!
No way. I would never do that.
tan line. oh god the tan line
I am trying this tonite. My wife will love it.
They are so hot, always walk away with my pussy juice dripping.
Got to love a wife that lets you eat her cream pie that you made. She a keeper
i want too eats world biggest cream pie
I use to do this all the time.i like to eat my own cum off my wife's pussy,her face and her tits.i've found a better way to lick cum off my wife.i lick up another mans cum off her tits.sometime I eat cum off my wife after several men cum on her face,hr tits or both.i love eat another mans cum.his creamy hot cum taste so good.
guy doesn't know how to fuck!
oh my god oh my god, why are you fucking god
In the old days this is what was called a "FrenchSnowball", I myself like to clean up my mess in the morning from the night before, the "girl", loves to eaten in the morning good show, thank you for your share!!!
I would love to meet a couple who are into that. It got me very aroused.
nice tanline, guy. lol
i came here from dank memes
Real men eat cream pie :-)
Most women will orgasm over and over as they watch cum licked up. Try
Any hot girl wants me to deeply lick my huge load of cum fron her pussy?
A true gent!
That closet gay KS just can't seem to get Joey out of his mind - Too Funny!
I want my husband to that to me.
I would love for someone to do this to me :)
Joey you are the real deal. Great films and I love Jenny's cunt.
please more videos like this
I love you guys!!! I'd like to try it but my wife would never let me do it!! It would really turn her off!! We are both quite elderly 75 & 70 and she is very concertive!! we have been married 50 yrs!!! I may have missed it but I would love to hear her saying I'm coming! I'm coming! a few times when she comes!! My wife does do that and it is always the icing on the cake for me!!!
very sexy couple, but i don't understand why he wore panties O-o
Joey is a bikini banana hammoc wearin MOFO. Funny. Bet the ladies really appreciate his old balls down at the beach.
short cock and g-string tan lines waaay too much of a turn off
Love cream pies...... Mmmmmm
I love my wifes freashly fucked pussy and cum kisses from her after she sucks another mans hard cock!
I would love to do this, but one load isn't enough. I would fill her with my first. Then maybe get her to suck me off, then quickly add a second load to the cream filling
Plow that brown eye and eat it
Lick that pussy.. Give her pleasure.. Your cum is good.. If you won't eat it then you're a fucking pussy.. Flat out.. Just do it..
But why eat your own cum?
I want to lick that cock clean and suck out that pussy for a hour
love it beautiful. fuck me until i cream then lick it baby
I always insist that hubby eat his cream pie. It can be pussy or anal cream pie, he eats it!
The scene was hot as hell BUT when he licked her of his own cum it triggered my gag reflex.
I do like the taste of sperm too. As far as I know, lots of couples enjoy to do that : sucking the pussy of his wife when it's filled is the normal continuation of a love session. Doing the same in gangbang is a proof of confidence for all the participants, women and men as well. My wife is proud to show off her well used pussy and to offer it.
i fucking love you both
always has been a fantasy but never had the nerve to try,
Me and my boyfriend play like this everyday.... while im reading a book or watching tv he eats my pussy and eats my cum
oh my..never seen before...and i really like what im watching...realllly like it...im all wet and very horny.. might wake up my husband..or the neighbour
you can wake me up baby;)
any woman wanting this, i'm here and waiting. its the best tasting treat to eat. my ex and i did this all nite, every nite nonfuckin stop. fuck, i miss them hot steamy times having cream delight at the 'y'. i'd also try to get some all over my face, too
sublime !
I love to eat cum of other guys out of asshole and cunt. Then I such the cocks, if I am allowed to. Doing this I prefer having a tight lace around my balls, simulating light castration pain
Ate Creampie Three times its my favorite topping for a sweet pussy.
Love doing this. My wife lets me, & sometimes kisses me with a mouthful of cum. I've told her she can be fucked by another guy in front of me, and I'll lick his cum out of her cunt. I'll also suck his cock clean.
Some errors occurred, please try again later


text:
Material: Papers from Glitz, flowers, leaves, felt border and bling from Prima, thickers from Pink Paislee and pins from Maya Road.
Everyone who enters the June inspiration challenge will automatically go into a draw to win two Sassafras Lass Collection kits plus Foldies and Banner Stickers. Go to the Get Picky site and be inspired by the movie poster.


text:
How do you answer somebody, so that you take part of a post, then it says
somebody wrote:
I was trying to reply to a post from Salsaro. I got the part of his post I wanted but it did not say,
Salsaro wrote:
This is in yesterday's daily cup.
Bottom line, I don't know computor's and I can't type fast.
My wife says I hunt and peck.
I guess this makes me a hunt and pecker.javascript:emoticon(':wink:')