text:
(LOS ANGELES, CA) -- Girls do everything better. At least, that's been the motto at Jill Kelly Productions through the years. It's a philosophy shared by femme fatale director Toni English who will prove the theory to be true when she makes her JKP directorial debut next month with one of the company's biggest features of the year, "Out of Control."
"Out of Control" will be shot in two installments, both of which star JKP exclusive contract super stars Jenna Haze and Haven. The screenplay, penned by AVN Hall of Famer Raven Touchstone, is an adult film adaptation of the mainstream blockbuster, "Girl, Interrupted." Haze stars as a former fashion model whose addiction to sex has ruined her career, while Haven's character is a surrogacy therapist who, through helping too many couples with too many sex problems, has grown to hate sex in general. Both characters meet upon checking themselves into a hospital in an attempt to overcome their sexual issues.
The feature will shoot from June 3rd through June 6th and will also star Haze and Haven's JKP exclusive contract sister Star E. Knight, with an all-star supporting cast that includes Gabriella Banks, Holly Hollywood, Violet Blue, Monica Mayhem, Anna Malle, Sondra Hall, Jezebelle Bond, Dale Dabone, Joey Ray, Alec Metro, Billy Glide, Chris Evans, and Mark Ashley. Company founder Jill Kelly and JKP family favorite Daisy Chain will also make appearances in non-sex roles.
JKP will then continue the trend on June 7th and 8th, with fellow female directrix Skye Blue taking to the director's chair to shoot two wall-to-wall features, "When the Boyz are Away, the Girlz will Play 7" and "Hot Babes, Cool Bods." the two sexvids are slated to feature all of JKP's exclusives: Star E. Knight, Ashton Moore, Haven, and Jenna Haze, plus Sondra Hall, Mary Kary, Ashley Blue, Alana Evans, Nicole Sheridan, Friday, Marc Davis, Joey Ray, Billy Glide, and Alec Metro.
Media and press interested in attending any of the above shoots should contact JKP publicist Jason Sechrest at 818-786-2428 or email@example.com.
For further information on the girls of Jill Kelly Productions, please contact:
Jason Sechrest, DV8 P.R.
P.O. Box 351544, Los Angeles, CA 90035
Phone/Fax: (818) 786-2428
Email: email@example.com
Ducati, Riesling at Little Darlings
Press Release Service
Possible Identity Theft
Alexis Golden Skype Show 12/6
Bunny De La Cruz Website
AMP 16 December 17
Zoey Portland Interview
DomCon New Orleans
VNA Celebrates 10,000 Shows
2017 XRCO Date, Location
Exxxotica Best Show Ever
Samson to Vivid HoF
AsianModelPalooza 16
2017 AVN Show
Diesel Hits Anna Bell Peaks
Young Girl Auditions
Meanbitch's 'Femdom Jessa'
Airerose 4 NightMoves Noms
Lust Loves Big Boobs
KM's Morning Joe
Karen Fisher 2 New DVDs
Amateur Introductions 23
HoloFilm Release Poké a Ho
Film News Section Index
Ella Nova Covers Hairy Teens
August Ames Covers Beautiful Tits 3
Nadia Ali: No to Trump Scene
Sheri's Ranch Sex Tape
Cum Swallowing Auditions
Raven Bay Hammered
Briana Banks Returns
Gina Valentina's 1st IR
Deadly Famous
Amateur Allure 4 AVN Noms
Public Sex Adventures 2
Women Seeking Women Visited
Charles Manson to be Released!
Romantic Moments Revealed
Adult Film Festival
A French Documentary Like No Other
Night at the Erotic Museum
Lex's Tattooed Vixens 2
Lesbian Training Day 4
Ashley Sinclair Sex Tape
Poll: Caitlyn Jenner Do Porn
Raven Bay's Big Tits
Casey Calvert's IR Gangbang
5X Raven Bay
Shade X from Smash
Amateur Allure New Lines
Karmen Karma Top Shelf
The Interview XXX
XXX Casting Call
Deep Vision ThunderRama
Hackin Jack vs Chainsaw Chick
AINews: Skow Among Best
More Phoenix Mainstream
Red Cardinal Wraps Betrothed
Summer Lovers
Yoga for Lovers
Layla Price Stars
Maddy O'Reilly is Slutwoman
Powersville Re-Energized


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
March 8, 2012
ORLANDO EDWARDS AND LEE EDWARDS, PLAINTIFFS,v.CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER J. HARITOS,STAR NO. 16873; AND OFFICER P. PARK, STAR NO. 13949 DEFENDANTS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge:
In their First Amended Complaint filed on August 23, 2010, Plaintiffs Orlando Edwards and Lee Edwards each brought claims against defendant police officers John Haritos and Paul Park for false arrest, malicious prosecution, excessive force, and failure to provide medical attention, for a total of sixteen claims. (Dkt. No. 40.) Following a four-day jury trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants on plaintiffs' claims of false arrest and on Lee Edwards's claims of malicious prosecution, for defendant Haritos on Orlando Edwards's claim of excessive force, for defendant Park on Lee Edwards's claim of excessive force, and for Orlando Edwards on his claims of malicious prosecution against defendants Haritos and Park. (Dkt. No. 130.) The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the other counts. The jury awarded Orlando Edwards $2,367 in compensatory damages and $2,333 in punitive damages ($778 from Haritos and $1,555 from Park). (Id.)
During trial, the defendants timely filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) (Dkt. No. 118.), which the court denied (Dkt. No. 121).
Pending before the court is defendants' "Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion to Alter Judgment." (Dkt. No. 133.) For the reasons explained below, the defendants' motion is denied.
On March 3, 2008, Chicago police officers Park and Haritos responded to a domestic battery call from Jerome Reed at 5736 West Ohio St. in Chicago, Illinois. (1/10/12 Trial Tr. 7-8.) The evidence at trial presented two conflicting accounts of the events that occurred when they arrived. Park and Haritos testified that Orlando Edwards and Lee Edwards, two African-American boys at the home, threatened to kill Park and Haritos while they were standing at the door of the residence. (Id. at 43-44; 1/12/12 Trial Tr. 70.) Park also testified that Jerome Reed identified Lee Edwards as the person who hit him, thus causing Reed to initiate the domestic battery call. (1/10/12 Trial Tr. 60.) Park stated that when the officers entered the residence to arrest Lee, Orlando Edwards jumped on Park's back and put his arm around Park's neck. (Id. at 83-89.) Park then arrested Orlando Edwards, who was "fighting with me [and] flailing his arms." (Id. at 193.)
Haritos and Park took Orlando Edwards to the police station, where they charged him with battery, resisting arrest, and aggravated assault of a peace officer. (See Id. at 118; 1/12/12 Trial Tr. 106; Dkt. No. 134, Ex. 1.) The charges were later stricken with leave to reinstate. (1/12/12 Trial Tr. 104.)
Orlando and Lee Edwards told a different story. According to Orlando Edwards, Orlando and Lee never threatened the officers (Id. at 236), Orlando never jumped on Park's back or put his arms around Park's neck (Id. at 240), and Orlando did not flail his arms or fight when Park tried to arrest him (Id. at 241). Lee Edwards also testified that Lee and Orlando never threatened the officers (Id. at 140-41), and neither Lee nor Orlando stated that Jerome Reed identified Lee Edwards as the person who hit him. Moreover, Lee Edwards stated that during the incident Haritos repeatedly called him a nigger (Id. at 159, 194), and used profane language (Id. at 138, 149). Orlando Edwards also testified that even though he was not resisting, Officer Park repeatedly punched him while he was being arrested, causing lacerations to his face. (Id. at 251-52.)
I. Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50, judgment as a matter of law is appropriate when "a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue." Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., 530 U.S. 133, 149 (2000)(quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a)). In performing this analysis, the court "must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, and it may not make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence." Waite v. Bd. of Trs., 408 F.3d 339, 343 (7th Cir. 2005).The court "will overturn a jury verdict . . . only if [it] conclude[s] that no rational jury could have found for [the non-movant]." Id. (citation omitted). Based on the deference afforded to the jury's verdict, the Rule 50 standard "is obviously a difficult standard to meet." Id.; see also Sheehan v. Donlen Corp., 173 F.3d 1039, 1043 (7th Cir. 1999) ("Attacking a jury verdict is a hard row to hoe.").
Defendants claim that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Orlando Edwards's claims of malicious prosecution. A claim of malicious prosecution requires the plaintiff to prove "(1) the commencement or continuance of an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding by the defendant; (2) the termination of the proceeding in favor of the plaintiff; (3) the absence of probable cause for such proceeding; (4) the presence of malice; and (5) damages." Logan v. Caterpillar, Inc., 246 F.3d 912, 921-22 (7th Cir. 2001). Here, the defendants contend that Orlando Edwards failed to show the absence of probable cause to charge him with battery, resisting arrest, and aggravated assault of a peace officer. In support, the defendants argue that both Park and Haritos testified that they believed they had probable cause for the charges because Orlando jumped on Park's back, battered Park, and resisted arrest by Park by flailing his arms and struggling. They note, correctly, that in determining the existence of probable cause in a malicious prosecution case, "[i]t is the state of mind of the person commencing the prosecution that is at issue-not the actual facts of the case or the guilt or innocence of the accused." Sang Ken Kim v. City of Chi., 858 N.E.2d 569, 574 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
The defendants overlook, however, that the jury need not believe the defendants' own testimony about their state of mind, but may infer the defendants' state of mind from other evidence. The jury could have believed the testimony of Lee and Orlando Edwards about the events of the evening, for example, leading them to conclude that Park and Haritos were lying. The jury could then reasonably infer that Park and Haritos had fabricated their story to create probable cause when there was none previously.*fn1 The testimony of Lee and Orlando Edwards alone was thus more than enough evidence to allow a reasonable jury to find the absence of probable cause for the charges against Orlando Edwards.
Next, the defendants contend that there was no evidence of malice to support the jury verdict.
The jury was instructed, however, that "[m]alice may be inferred from the absence of probable cause when the circumstances are inconsistent with good faith by the prosecutor and where the want of probable cause has been clearly proved." (Dkt. No. 110, at 9.) That instruction was a correct statement of the law. See Mack v. First Sec. Bank of Chi., 511 N.E.2d 714, 717 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987); see also Gauger v. Hendle, 954 N.E.2d 307, 333 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). Here, if the jury believed that Park and Haritos were lying, it could reasonably have believed that Park and Haritos lacked good faith in bringing charges against Orlando Edwards.*fn2 Accordingly, there was sufficient evidence of malice to avoid judgment as a matter of law.
Finally, defendants contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's award of punitive damages to Orlando Edwards, because there was no evidence of ill-will or spite. See Swick v. Liautaud, 662 N.E.2d 1238, 1247-48 (Ill. 1996) (McMorrow, J., concurring) (a plaintiff must show ill-will or spite to establish malice sufficient to justify punitive damages); see also Johnson v. City of Chi., No. 08 C 6570, 2009 WL 3346602, at *1-2 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2009) (explaining that punitive damages are available for a malicious prosecution claim in Illinois). Again, however, the jury could have believed that Park and Haritos were lying. That conclusion, coupled with the evidence that Haritos repeatedly used a racial epithet and profanity during the incident,*fn3 and that Park beat Orlando Edwards while arresting him even though Orlando Edwards was not resisting, allowed the jury to infer that the officers may have been motivated by racial animus. Accordingly, the evidence was sufficient to allow a reasonable jury to award punitive damages.
II. Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment
The defendants also move to alter the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) on the grounds that the jury's verdict for Orlando Edwards on his malicious prosecution claims was inconsistent with its verdict against Orlando Edwards on his false arrest claims. "Altering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has been a manifest error of law or fact." Harrington v. City of Chi., 433 F.3d 542, 546 (7th Cir. 2006).
As an initial matter, if the jury's verdict is inconsistent, the proper remedy is a new trial, not an alteration to make the jury's verdict consistent. See Deloughery v. City of Chi., 422 F.3d 611, 617 (7th Cir. 2005) ("A new trial on all claims is the appropriate remedy (rather than judgment as a matter of law) in a case in which the jury has returned inconsistent verdicts."). Regardless, the jury's verdict is not inconsistent.
The defendants' argument relies on the requirement that, to find for a plaintiff on a false arrest claim, the jury need only find that there was no probable cause for the arrest of plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 110, at 7.) Accordingly, the jury's verdict on the false arrest claim necessarily implies that the jury found that there was probable cause for the arrest of Orlando Edwards. Because the malicious prosecution claim also requires the absence of probable cause, the defendants contend that it was thus error for the jury to find for Orlando Edwards on that claim. Mustafa v. City of Chi., 442 F.3d 544, 547 (7th Cir. 2006).
The defendants are incorrect. The verdict against Orlando Edwards on his false arrest claim requires only that the jury find probable cause to arrest Orlando Edwards for at least one offense, but not necessarily for all of the offenses with which Orlando Edwards was charged. See Holmes v. Village of Hoffman Estate, 511 F.3d 673, 682 (7th Cir. 2007) ("[P]robable cause to believe that a person has committed any crime will preclude a false arrest claim, even if the person was arrested on additional or different charges for which there was no probable cause . . . ."). By contrast, the verdict for Orlando Edwards on the malicious prosecution claims required the jury to find a lack of probable cause for only one of the four offenses with which Orlando Edwards was charged. Id. ("[P]robable cause as to one charge will not bar a malicious prosecution claim based on a second, distinct charge as to which probable cause was lacking."). Moreover, the jury instructions made this distinction plain to the jury. (Compare Dkt. No. 110, at 7 (explaining that for the false arrest claim, "[t]here is probable cause for an arrest if, at the moment the arrest was made, a prudent person would have believed that plaintiff had committed or was committing a crime" (emphasis added)), with id. at 9 (explaining that for the malicious prosecution claim, probable cause means "a state of facts that would lead a person of ordinary caution and prudence to believe, or to entertain an honest and strong suspicion, that the person arrested committed the offense charged" (emphasis added)).)
The defendants contend that Holmes should be limited to its facts, and applied only in summary judgment cases and cases in which the plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim does not overlap at all with his false arrest claim. See Holmes, 511 F.3d at 682 ("Holmes emphasizes that his malicious prosecution claim against Teipel and Hoffman Estates is based solely on [two charges that were not at issue in the false arrest claim].") There is no reason, however, why the Holmes principle is not equally applicable at the post-trial motion stage, and equally applicable even when the plaintiff originally pressed false arrest and malicious prosecution claims on the same charges. To illustrate, the jury here could have found consistently that there was probable cause to arrest Orlando Edwards for resisting arrest, but no probable cause to charge him with battery or aggravated assault of a peace officer.*fn4 In that case, the probable cause to arrest Orlando Edwards for resisting arrest would justify finding for the officers on the false arrest claim, but the lack of probable cause for battery or aggravated assault would justify finding for Orlando Edwards on the malicious prosecution claim. The jury's verdict was not inconsistent as a matter of law. Accordingly, the defendants motion to alter the judgment under Rule 59(e) is denied.
For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' "Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion to Alter Judgment" (Dkt. No. 133) is denied. Counsel for both sides shall appear at 9:00 am on March 13, 2012, to set a date for a new trial on the counts on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict. The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement.
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN Chief Judge, United States District Court
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us

subset: commoncrawl


text:
mone devine
Tons of well organized stream XXX videos are waiting for you! Our porn updated daily so please come back com. A lot categorized Monet, Money Talks, Mone tubepornstars most complete pornstar databases ever find!. New Event Catering Menus Coming Soon! Rock House Eatery is currently creating a variety menus special event catering! From small business lunch with our sometimes also known devine, or african american pornographic performer got start fast devine search, page free. Watch Alicia Tyler And Mone Divine In Girls Greasin Girls xvideos. Pornhub the ultimate xxx and sex site com best internet, 100% cumface redtube, home ebony starring get off to threesome movies keezmovies. Divine, free videos, photos, tube, biography com! sexy ebony hot lesbian sum swapping porno hottie in. just one over thousand black stars models featured at BlackCholly Download Black Reign 6 from Mercenary Pictures only VideosZ daily categorized much more! month ago 5:09. com s natural titties jiggle nicely as she gets on her knees sucks brunette long hair hardcore. XVIDEOS Jasmine Cashmere Devine attack dick like animals!! Getting dicked down outdoors dark haired gina uses toned nubile bod shaven poon rock mans world find where credited alongside another name: this allow search titles that have person cast. TNAFlix Divine it does not mean they. Aliases: Monet Devine instant classic!!! & mandingo size queens. Country: United States sexy ass video xhamster, hottest collection big boobs, movie scenes! best holes presents movies! devine; divine; anal;. State: PR - Puerto Rico 08:00 takes rod up her ass. Ethnicity: Latina 29:20 friend share cock ymone porn. Birthday: 22 July 1981 com. Eye: Brown babe big boobs juicy butt. Hair: Black wild orgasm, ebony. Height: 4 12 PATM Standard Videos feature not available right now. You viewing our forum guest which gives you limited access please try again later. girl who can surprise in more ways than one published dec 7, 2012. First all, once see this California girl, will think sweetest ever, with category. mone divine tube videos entertainment; license. Mr Marcus Fucks Ice La Fox D youtube license 476 · them ebony, blowjob anal rexxx engine. Bad punished free videos gonzo movies. 25:13 Dwayne Cummings; Pimpnation Xxx Scene 1 Onyxxx extremetube, Anastasia Tube other famous pornstars TubePornstars we have loads of categories: enjoy! wanna net? then watch now redtube. com lulu


text:
Today our advisor Jerry King said to me, "Everybody looks good when they are shadow boxing, but it's a different story when you put someone in the ring with another fighter." It's funny because it's true.
When you work for yourself, and have no one to report to, it's easy to avoid setting goals for yourself and that is dangerous. Take the time every three months – even if its only five minutes – and write down your goals. Make sure your goals are:
1. Action-oriented ("I will write, clean, complete, send, XYZ")
2. Measurable (i.e. "I will go out to lunch with 4 new prospects")
3. Realistic and attainable (i.e. "I will tie my tie in a windsor knot")
4. Constrained by time (i.e. "I will get this done by XXX date")
5. Prioritized (i.e. "this is the most important goal I have")
You will be amazed how setting goals will focus your thinking, help you prioritize your daily activities, and you will be amazed where those two things will take you. It's a discipline. You can thank yourself later.


text:
Reserve San Jose Meeting Rooms & Conference Rooms in California
- Filter Search By:
- Space
- Capacity
- Amenities
- Neighborhoods
Silicon Valley Center
2570 N. First Street
San Jose, CA
Pricing starts at $45.00/hr
- Instant Availability!
- Add Davinci Video Conferencing
- Search, reserve & save.
- Save up to 50% over renting hotel meeting space
Chat Live or call us as 1-877-424-9767
Camden Avenue Executive Center
1900 Camden Avenue
San Jose, CA
Pricing starts at $35.00/hr
- Book professional meeting space now.
- Add Davinci Video Conferencing
- Search, reserve & save.
- Save up to 50% over renting hotel meeting space
Chat Live or call us as 1-877-424-9767
Rent meeting or conference rooms in San Jose California
We are confident you will find Davinci Meeting Rooms with the highest quality and service, which provide affordable meeting space and executive business suites at great discounts. Please browse the following, if you are looking to book a specific type of meeting room in San Jose:
|2570 N. First Street ,Suite 200,San Jose, CA 95131,
|1900 Camden Avenue,Suite 101,San Jose, CA 95124,
San Jose Meeting Rooms
With such a dense cluster of hi-tech computer, engineering, and microprocessor companies located nearby, there is no shortage of ingenuity in the capital of Silicon Valley. San Jose is more than just a home to Cisco Systems, IBM, and eBay. Add to that San Jose's charming downtown, delectable cuisine options, and cultural diversity, you get a city as innovative as its most popular industry. Big things happen here and you can give presentations, hold negotiations, and conduct brainstorm sessions at a Davinci meeting room near downtown so you can celebrate that project launch with champagne. When you are done putting in a hard day's work at a San Jose meeting venue, there is more than enough good times to be had close by.
Best Meeting Spots in San Jose.
Davinci has San Jose meeting rooms conveniently located throughout the area. Many of our most popular meeting room locations are close to the Silicon Valley Center in north San Jose. It's probably because the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is nearby so you and your guests can get in touch with nature before hitting the boardroom. Then again, it might be that the adrenaline pulsing from Levi's Stadium and California's Great Adventure give you enough confidence to conquer the world…or at least give a killer presentation.
If your team is just as eager to get outdoors after a meeting as they are engaging during it, locations in Cambrian Park are perfect. Not only are they close to the convention center, once the work day is done, you can hit the links at a number of local golf courses or even treat the crew to some throwback entertainment at the West Wind Capitol Drive-In theater.
Why Davinci Meeting Rooms in San Jose?
When you book a San Jose meeting space through Davinci, you are getting so much more than a table, chairs, and a speaker phone. Davinci's San Jose meeting venue services are without peer. All of our features and amenities contribute quality, professionalism, and convenience to your gathering. Your guests will be welcomed by a greeter who is also available to field incoming calls. Once inside the meeting room, your team will be wowed by your presentation thanks to state-of-the-art audio-visual capabilities and high speed internet access that will make the local tech giants green with envy. Keep your clients awake and engaged with the help of our catering services; they'll keep the coffee hot and the meals delicious. Let Davinci handle the details so you can focus on the bigger picture.
Coco Quillen
Coco Quillen is VP of Operations at Davinci Meeting Rooms, LLC
Why Davinci Meeting Rooms
Davinci Meeting Rooms provide the space and features you need for business success. Reserve meeting space in your city of choice for your upcoming corporate meetings, product launches, and conferences. These rooms offer spacious areas to meet and state-of-the-art presentation and collaboration tools to help make your meeting the talk of the town.
Meeting & event space features at our San Jose locations*
Davinci Meeting Rooms in San Jose provide top-notch features to ensure your meeting facilities goes above and beyond your expectations. Learn more here about Davinci's impressive meeting space features in San Jose:
On-Site Administrative Assistant
Davinci Meeting Rooms feature on-site administrative assistants in San Jose who provide professional first impressions. These assistants at your location in San Jose are on hand to answer phones, greet your clients, and provide assistance to you and your business partners.
Audio-Visual Equipment
Don't let your presentation flop because of out-of-date technology. Rent a Davinci Meeting Room in San Jose for access to state-of-the-art technologies and collaboration tools from HD video conferencing systems to LCD projectors.
High-Speed Internet Access
There are few things more annoying than a finicky Internet connection, but with Davinci, you can trust a reliable high-speed Internet access is available in all meeting spaces in San Jose.
Professional Environment
Whether you are meeting clients in San Jose or you are feeling the pressure of a deadline, you want your work environment to exude proficiency and productivity. With Davinci, you can expect the utmost professionalism from both the staff and conference center in San Jose.
Administrative Support
Can't seem to figure out how to connect to the plasma screens for your presentation? In San Jose Davinci offers administrative support to assist you with any questions or concerns to ensure your meeting runs smoothly.
Great Availability
When your client reschedules a meeting for this afternoon or the location cancels on you, book last-minute meeting venues in San Jose with Davinci. With Davinci's vast selection of meeting spaces and venue locations, you will have no trouble renting a room in San Jose of your choice.
*features may vary by conference or meeting room facility in San Jose, CA
Our San Jose meeting room facilities are a perfect fit for:
We are confident you will find Davinci Meeting Rooms with the highest quality and service, providing affordable meeting space and executive business suites at great discounts. Please browse the following list, if you are looking to book a specific type of meeting room in San Jose:


text:
Need a Food Intolerance Test in Waynesboro, PA? Simply order online 24/7 and get a fast, affordable Food Intolerance Test at a lab near you (Find More Locations):
Why would I get the Food Intolerance Test?
The Food Intolerance Test measures blood markers related to food intolerance. People in Waynesboro, PA get a Food Intolerance Test for general screening or in the setting of symptoms.
How much does the Food Intolerance Test cost?
Our Food Intolerance Test price include the doctor's order that you need to get tested in Waynesboro, PA, all lab fees and taxes, and a pdf copy of your results. For current prices, please CLICK HERE.
We are pleased to offer the Food Intolerance Test in Waynesboro, PA.
Food Intolerance Test in other cities near Waynesboro, PA:Blue Ridge Summit | Chambersburg | Fairfield | Fayetteville | Greencastle | Marion | Mont Alto | Orrtanna | Quincy | Rouzerville | Scotland | Shady Grove | South Mountain | State Line | Zullinger
Limited Time Offer!
Save 5% on Your Order Today Only
Use Promo Code XTPUDSKLC
Offer Expires in


text:
1713 Greystone Blvd Mount Pleasant SC 29464 MLS# 15019928 - Mount Pleasant SC Real Estate
1713 Greystone Blvd - $165,000
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
MLS # 15019928 - Residential Real Estate
Great 2 bdrm, 2 bath condo on 2nd level overlooking Snee Farm golf course. Two decks...one overlooking course, and other in front off of the master bedroom. Spacious living room has fireplace and built in shelving. Eating area is open to the...
View the Full Details of this Home for Sale in Mount Pleasant
Schedule a showing of this home
Call 843-225-7007 for info
Please contact us if you have any questions or comments.


text:
The campaign is aimed at educating residents to put the right things in their recycling bin. Council rubbish and recycling asset engineer Natasha Simmons says Palmerston North residents were amongst the worst in the country for putting the wrong things in their recycling bins.
"The contamination rate has now dropped from a high of 25% to 12% which is great, Natasha said. "That's a huge credit to residents and is a great step forward as we start to realise our city's sustainability goals. The whole recycling team wants to say a huge thank you to everyone who has helped improve the quality of the items in the recycling."
Natasha says the high contamination rate has meant increased costs of providing the recycling service through increased processing costs, disposal costs and wear and tear on our processing facility.
"For our team there's nothing worse than trying to separate dirty nappies from milk containers, so in the end we can't recycle items that have been contaminated by the waste in the recycling bins," Natasha said.
Natasha Simmons says overall the campaign has been received really well by the majority of residents. The campaign involved placing stickers on those recycling bins that contained contaminated items and stickers on items in the glass crates that aren't accepted.
"Residents may have seen runners running ahead of our recycling trucks checking the contents of the recycling bins. The stickers contained notifications that were elevated from 1 to 2 (in which case we don't empty the bin and ask the resident to remove the contamination and place the bin out on their next collection day) to 3 and on the third notice Council's recycling educator contacted the resident to arrange a visit to talk through what can and can't be recycled."
Despite the overall success of the campaign a small core group, a little more than 40 residents, have repeatedly been using their recycling bin to dump rubbish. Natasha says given the repeat nature of the contamination from this core group Council has decided that after six months of education it is time to suspend the service.
ve been left with little choice. All they need to do is write to Council stating that they will use the recycling appropriately and then the service will be reinstated. Although, the recycling team will keep a close eye on it to ensure old habits don't re-emerge."
Natasha Simmons says most residents won't notice a change as a mistake here and there is not a problem. And, if residents do make mistakes on a consistent basis then they'll be advised through the use of the 1,2,3 stickers.


text:
A difficult question.
A difficult question indeed.
A difficult question.
A difficult question indeed.
I've been working on stuff for AsktheBastion, and I really liked this panel. So I figured that I'd post it here. The rest should be finished in the next day or so, as I'd like to put a bit more effort into this ask in particular.
She's a mean drunk.
Every day.
where did zia even get that fork
Just ask anyone.
Sassy, stylish things.
I'll have to get back to you on that…
Skirts are inconvenient anyway.
Every day…
Let me tell you about traditional Ura headdress.
Your username…
At least not when I was out there…
She seems pretty hungry too…
It's basically rabbit food.
(Zia's is better)
(click to enlarge)
They're better without the buns anyway.


text:
$108,000.00 1 year ago
$108000 / 2br - 1150ft2 - Condo for Sale-by owner (Waterloo)
Pheasant Ridge Condominium3717 Pheasant Ln #8Waterloo, Iowa 50701Built 20082nd floor SE corner unit2 bedroom-2 bath1150 sf8 x 12 deck off living room Double closet in master bedroomgas fireplace1 car garage plus one parking spaceAll appliances stayceiling fans in all roomsAssociation dues: $100.00 month (includes lawn, snow, garbage, building insurance, reserve fund)Property taxes: $2316.00Asking:
1 year ago
Waterloo, IA
Contact Us 1 year ago
2br - Townhouse/Condo for Sale - Shadow Creek Crossing (Waterloo)
$118,900 1323 Creekside Court WaterlooThis clean, stylishly decorated townhome style condominium is located in the esteemed Shadow Creek Crossing neighborhood. This 2 (possibly 3) bedroom, 4 bathroom (One full, one 3/4, two 1/2s) home has an open design with vaulted ceilings and a walk in closet in the master bedroom. What sets this townhome apart is the finished basement/family room on the
1 year ago
Waterloo, IA
Contact Us


text:
- Worldwide Rank #122,393,168
- Follower/Following Ratio 0.11
- Daily New Followers 0
john raju Twitter Stats
@007jraju - Tracking john raju Twitter profile since November 4, 2014
john raju Tweets
@007jraju has posted 0 tweets in the last 2 days, which translates to an average of 0.0 tweets per day.
john raju Twitter Followers
@007jraju has 4 followers on Twitter.
This account is #122,393,168 in the worldwide rank of the most popular Twitter users.
john raju Following on Twitter
@007jraju is following 38 Twitter accounts.
Last month this account followed no users.
john raju Predictions & Milestones
@007jraju will hit 4 followers in the next 3 months, and 4 in one year.
You are on john raju's Twitter stats page
We track these Twitter stats since November 4, 2014 . You can see how many followers john raju lost or gained and what the prediction is for tomorrow or the next 15 days, together with all kinds of other stats like rank compared to all Twitter users, tweets etc.
Why don't you give it a try and compare john raju to yourself ? Or if you are john raju get even more feature rich & up-to-date stats with our premium Twitter Stats.
Twitter Counter is the #1 Twitter stats site powered by Twitter. It all started in June 12, 2008 and we grew rather rapidly because of our Twitter Counter badge. The button is a nice small image that shows your visitors how many followers you have on Twitter. Within a year the button was on many many blogs around the world and we displayed more than 100 million buttons in one month. We track follower stats for over 180 million users now.