text:
1. Introducing 39-year-old Bulgarian gymnast, Yordan Yovchev.
Via bgonair.bg
2. Yordan qualified and competed for his SIXTH Olympic games in London.
3. No other gymnast has ever competed in as many games.
MIKE BLAKE / Reuters
4. He also carried Bulgaria's flag in the opening ceremony Parade Of Nations.
5. Oh yeah, he competed in London with a partially broken wrist and a partially torn bicep.
BRIAN SNYDER / Reuters
6. And he might even compete again. In an interview he said, "I feel great at the moment, it was such an emotional competition. I'll take a break and then we'll see. Let's not speak with certainty."
Via wkzo.com
DYLAN MARTINEZ / Reuters
8. He's pretty successful, too.
Via bgonair.bg
9. Yordan won 2 bronze medals at the 2000 Olympic Games in floor and rings.
10. In the 2004 Olympics he won a silver on rings and a bronze on floor.
11. He also does Ninja Warrior competitions.
Via article.wn.com
12. Did I mention he's really handsome?
14. To finish, here are some shirtless pics because I know that's what you guys really want to see.
H/t to Joe My God for introducing me to this guy.
Preview Your Response
In The News Today
- Donald Trump will remain an executive producer on NBC's "The Celebrity Apprentice" while he's president.
- The Oakland warehouse where 36 people were killed last week may have never been subject to a fire inspection — a yearly requirement.
- John Glenn, a pioneering astronaut and the first American to orbit the Earth, has died at 95. Godspeed, Glenn 🚀🇺🇸
- Uber finally laid out hard rules for riders: No guns, sex, or barfing, please 🚗❌


text:
Looking for a vacation rental in Telford? Tripping.com has 468 rental homes available in Telford. Potential renters will find studios, 355 1-bedroom, 73 2-bedroom and 40 rentals with 3 or more bedrooms ranging from $25 a night to $974 a night. Many of these properties are instantly bookable.
The average price of a nightly rental in Telford is $110 while the average price of a weekly rental is $1884. For those looking for more than a short term rental such as corporate rentals, extended stays or long term rentals, the average monthly price of a Telford home is $984.
Wondering if you can bring your favorite dog or cat with you? We have 55 pet friendly vacation rentals available for you. In addition to accommodating pets, Telford rentals offer a variety of amenities. In particular, 149 rentals have internet and wifi, 391 have TV and/or cable and 12 have a pool or hot tub.Search properties from 8 rental sites in Telford where the top providers in that area are Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and HomeAway. There are 279 Booking.com rentals, 75 TripAdvisor short term rentals and 50 HomeAway vacation rentals.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Readers Also Like
Become a fan of TheStreet on Facebook.
Shares of this oil refiner could be poised for gains in the months ahead, thanks to pressure from an activist investor.
In a record year for acquisitions, 18 companies from across the spectrum were singled out by M&A professionals for doing deals that got results.
Liberum analysts argue that investors are overly concerned with AB InBev's Mexico exposure as the stock nears a 52-week low.
Constellation is the largest importer of Mexican beers such as Corona and Modelo, which account for more than half of its revenue.


text:
Slide to see the images
Scarlett Rose
9 years, Jack Russell mix
Scarlett is a sweet girl, love to be near you, walks, car rides, and so much more.
Scarlett is a diabetic and mostly blind but that does not stop her one bit.
Doggy door trained, house trained, gets along with other dogs all sizes. not sure about cats.
*Applications to adopt: wwwTucsonColdWetNoses.com Home Visit / ID and Residence Verification is required. Compliance does not imply or guarantee adoption. Approval is the sole discretion of CWN representative(s).
We are always looking for Volunteer event assistants to help with adoptions at Petsmart and Petco. Please email Terri @ email@example.com if you are interested. Thank you so much for considering becoming part of the Tucson Cold Wet Noses Team!


text:
Beer Batter For Fish or Veggies
Total Time
Prep 10 mins
Cook 6 mins
This excellent batter recipe comes from our Denver Fire Dept.'s "Favorites" cookbook. Been using it for years, and it's a "fail-safe", yummie recipe.
Ingredients Nutrition
- 1 cup flour
- 1 egg, beaten
- 1 teaspoon salt
- 1⁄2 teaspoon black pepper
- 1 tablespoon granulated sugar
- 1 tablespoon oil
- 1 1⁄2 teaspoons baking powder
- beer
- Mix all ingredients, except beer, in medium size bowl.
- Gradually add enough beer, starting with about a 1/2 a cup, to make batter consistency of thickened pancake batter.
- Mix til smooth.
- Dip fish (fillets, shrimp, etc.), veggies (zucchini, mushrooms, etc.) in batter, gently place into moderately hot oil (use either an electric skillet or Fry Daddy) approximately, 375 degrees, fry until puffy and golden brown, about 3 minutes, each side.
- Remove and drain on paper towel.
Most Helpful
Good batter recipe. I used slightly more than a cup of beer. I found that the finished product was better when the batter was on the thinner side. I tried the batter on fish and for onion rings. It was a great on onion rings. DS proclaimed "these are SOOOOO GOOD!" when he ate the onion rings.
I thought this recipe was fantastic. I made the batter pretty thick, which I prefer. The batter gave a nice flavor to the fish without being overpowering and was nice and crispy. The only thing I would change next time is make half as much. I used this with 1 lb of cod and had way too much.
Well, the batter does stay on well, but to be honest, it just was really lacking in flavor. Seemed like it needed more salt, or an herb or something. We just were not too impressed.However the fish really was moist, but unfortunately, the batter wasn't very crispy.


text:
Ahhhh… If you're into girls with tight little hardbodies and huge boobs then let me introduce you to Carla Maria Cadotte! This girl is sexy as hell and has amazing boobs! Be sure to take a peek and her photo sets on I Love Female Muscle…There are a few crazy hot videos are on the way soon too!
Carla Maria Cadotte Hot Muscle Girl Babe
ILoveFemaleMuscle.com – Female Muscle | Female Bodybuilders | Girls with Muscle


text:
$300.00 4 months ago
94 eagle talon salvage/parts - $300
Got in an accident just trying to get rid of it. Email any questions or call/text 989 297 one57three
4 months ago
Port Huron, MI
$400.00 8 months ago
For Sale: 1996 Eagle Talon parts - $400 (Beaver Creek)
Car not running. It came out of neighbors grove. Engine turns over but won't start. It was his grandson's car and he thinks the clutch is out of it. 2.0 l engine, 5 speed manual tran, 170,000 miles. He also can't find title so selling as parts car. might be able to find title if he really digs. Interior not to great. Has had mice in headliner. Make me an offer.
8 months ago
South West Minnesota, MN


text:
Free Ship & Free ReturnAventura Clothing Titus Pants
Aventura Clothing
Titus Pants
Welcome the end of your workweek with these casually chic Titus pants. ; Stretch herringbone in a cotton-twill fabrication in a regular fit pant. ; Mid-rise pants sits...
Free Ship & Free ReturnAventura Clothing Arden Standard Rise Capri
Aventura Clothing
Arden Standard Rise Capri
This Aventura capri is perfect for the transitioning seasons. ; Relaxed fit through the hips and thighs with a straight leg. ; Standard rise. ; Soft organic cotton fabric has a...
Free Ship & Free ReturnAventura Clothing Irene Leggings
Aventura Clothing
Irene Leggings
Elevate your everyday style in these comfy Irene Leggings. ; Mid-rise leggings features an allover subtle, geometric print throughout. ; Contrasting, ribbed-knit waistband. ;...
Free Ship & Free ReturnAventura Clothing Arden Pants
Aventura Clothing
Arden Pants
The Arden Pants are your go-to essential for easy, everyday adventure. ; Pants feature a regular rise, slightly loose fit, and straight leg. ; Durable, stretch cotton twill has...
Free Shipping any 2+ itemsAventura Clothing Blake Skimmer
Aventura Clothing
Blake Skimmer
Pair these pants with a simple tee or tank and you are on your way to style success. ; Mid-rise skimmer pant boasts an allover garment over-dye with stone wash twill. ;...


text:
Your Pregnancy Quick Guide
Understanding and Enhancing Your Baby's Development
By (author) Glade B. Dr. Curtis Judith Schuler
Format: Paperback
Normal Price: $12.99
Your Price: $11.69 AUD, inc. GST
Shipping: $7.95 per order
You Save: $1.30! (10% off normal price)
Plus...earn $0.58 in Boomerang Bucks
Availability: Available to Backorder, No Due Date for Supply
Your Pregnancy Quick Guide by Glade B. Dr. Curtis
Book DescriptionBy the best-selling authors of the Your Pregnancy series, medically sound and succinct information for the woman who needs detailed information on a specific concern -- Information on baby's weekly physical, intellectual, sensory, and social development -- Ideas for activities, play, and games that support growth in these areas --Detailed descriptions of what parents should look for to assess baby's developmental progress
Buy Your Pregnancy Quick Guide book by Glade B. Dr. Curtis from Australia's Online Bookstore, Boomerang Books.
Book DetailsISBN: 9780738210599
(178mm x 127mm x 10mm)
Pages: 192
Imprint: Da Capo Press Inc
Publisher: The Perseus Books Group
Publish Date: 1-Jun-2006
Country of Publication: United States
Other Editions...
Books By Author Glade B. Dr. Curtis
Su Embarazo Semana a Semana, Paperback (July 2013)
A Spanish-language translation of the bestselling, doctor-authored pregnancy guide
Your Pregnancy After 35, Paperback (March 2013)
The fully revised and updated edition of "Your Pregnancy after 35"
Your Baby's First Year Week by Week, Paperback (February 2010)» View all books by Glade B. Dr. Curtis
The new edition of a classic that parents love and trust, by the authors of Your Pregnancy(TM) Week by Week, with millions of copies sold
» Have you read this book? We'd like to know what you think about it - write a review about Your Pregnancy Quick Guide book by Glade B. Dr. Curtis and you'll earn 50c in Boomerang Bucks loyalty dollars (you must be a member - it's free to sign up!)
Author Biography - Glade B. Dr. Curtis
Glade B. Curtis, M.D., M.P.H., is board-certified by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the father of five. He lives in Utah. Judith Schuler, M.S., has worked and cowritten books with Dr. Curtis for more than twenty years. Ms. Schuler divides her time between homes in Wyoming and Arizona.
Facebook Page | Twitter | Google+ | Bulletin e-Newsletter | Blog | RSS
Become a Member | Book Lists | Recently Released | Coming Soon | Fast Delivery Books
Bestselling Books: Our Current Bestsellers | Australia's Hottest 1000 Books | Bestselling Fiction | Bestselling Crime Mysteries and Thrillers | Bestselling Non Fiction Books | Bestselling Sport Books | Bestselling Gardening and Handicrafts Books | Bestselling Biographies | Bestselling Food and Drink | Bestselling History | Bestselling Travel Books | Bestselling School Textbooks & Study Guides | Bestselling Children's General Non-Fiction | Bestselling Young Adult Fiction | Bestselling Children's Fiction | Bestselling Picture Books | Top 100 US Bestsellers
For: Schools | Organisations | Libraries | Publishers | Authors | Book Clubs | Bloggers | Affiliates
About Us | Contact Us | Help Desk | Security | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright
Phone: 1300 36 33 32 (9am-2pm Mon-Fri AEST) - International: +61 2 9960 7998 - Online Form
Address: Boomerang Books, 878 Military Road, Mosman Junction, NSW, 2088
© 2003-2016. All Rights Reserved. Eclipse Commerce Pty Ltd - ACN: 122 110 687 - ABN: 49 122 110 687
For every $20 you spend on books, you will receive $1 in Boomerang Bucks loyalty dollars. You can use your Boomerang Bucks as a credit towards a future purchase from Boomerang Books. Note that you must be a Member (free to sign up) and that conditions do apply.


text:
Fiat vector logo, free to download as Illustrator vector file. Typography logo graphics of the Italian Automobile Factory of Turin, Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino. Based in Turin, Fiat is a leading Italian industrial group, automobile and engine manufacturer. Fiat is Italy's biggest car producer.
Users Who Downloaded This File Also Downloaded
Users who downloaded this file also searched for


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 19, 2014
LAURA YASKO, on behalf of ALAN YASKO. M.D., Plaintiff,v.STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER, Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court on the cross-motions for summary judgment brought by Laura Yasko, on behalf of Alan Yasko, M.D. (doc. #27), and defendant Standard Insurance Company ("Standard") (doc. #30). Ms. Yasko brought this action pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a), as the surviving spouse and named beneficiary of Dr. Alan Yasko, challenging the denial of accidental death benefits (doc. #1: Complaint). Prior to his death, Dr. Yasko was a professor of orthopedic surgery at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine and served as Chief of Musculoskeletal Oncology at Northwestern's Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center (doc. #29: Plaintiff's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts ("Pl.'s SOMF") at ¶ 11). As part of his compensation, Dr. Yasko participated in an employee welfare benefit plan maintained by Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation ("Northwestern") for its eligible employees, which included life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment ("AD&D") insurance coverage underwritten and administered by defendant Standard (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 1, 6; doc. #32: Standard Insurance Company's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts ("Def.'s SOMF") at ¶ 1). Ms. Yasko challenges the denial of benefits totaling $1, 200, 000.00[2] under Standard's insurance policy following her husband's death in Mexico, where he had traveled by air to speak at a medical conference (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 1, 6, 17; doc. #28: Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment ("Pl.'s Mem.") at 1-2). Ms. Yasko contends that Dr. Yasko's death was caused by a pulmonary embolism[3] "triggered by extensive air travel, " and that consequently, it was accidental (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 22). Standard argues, however, that it properly denied coverage because Dr. Yasko's death was not caused by a bodily injury sustained in an accident, as required by the policy's accidental death clause (doc. #36: Standard Insurance Company's Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment ("Def.'s Mem.") at 11-15).
For the reasons set forth below, the we grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and deny the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
The following facts are drawn from the pleadings and the parties' Local Rule 56.1 submissions. The facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted by the Court. As part of its employee benefits plan, Northwestern provided Dr. Yasko with life insurance and AD&D insurance coverage under Group Life Insurance Policy, Group Policy No. 136810-A, issued by Standard (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 1; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 1). The policy provides, in relevant part:
The AD&D Benefit
... will be paid by Standard, if you are insured for accidental death & dismemberment insurance under the Group Policy and:
(1) you sustain bodily injuries as a result of an accident; and
(2) as a result, you suffer one of the following losses within 365 days after the date of the accident:
(a) Loss of life. Standard will pay 100% of the full amount. Proof of Loss satisfactory to Standard must be received before the accidental death and dismemberment insurance under the Group Policy will be paid.
No AD&D Benefit Will Be Paid
... if your death or other loss is caused by:
(1) a disease or illness of any kind, or medical or surgical treatment of these, except those resulting from purely accidental circumstances.
(Pl.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 9, 10; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 5). The "Benefits at a Glance" section of the policy states: "No AD&D Will Be Paid... if your death or other loss is caused by: (1) A disease or illness of any kind, including heart attack or stroke..." (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 6; doc. #46: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts ("Pl.'s Resp.") at ¶ 6). Finally, the policy specifies that Standard has "Discretionary Authority For Claims, " and states: "Benefits will be provided only if Standard decides in its discretion that you are entitled to them. This discretionary authority includes determining eligibility for benefits and interpreting the terms of the Group Policy" (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 11; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 9).
In March 2010, Dr. Yasko was diagnosed with a carcinoid tumor[4] in the left lower lobe of his lung (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 12; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 11). On March 23, 2010, Dr. Yasko was admitted to MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas in Houston, and underwent surgery, performed by Dr. Ara Vaporciyan, to remove the carcinoid tumor, a portion of the lower lobe of his left lung, and thirteen lymph nodes, as well as to repair a damaged section of the pulmonary artery (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 13, 14; Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 12-13).[5] One of the thirteen lymph nodes tested positive for metastasis (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 14 n.3; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 13).[6] At a follow-up visit on April 23, 2010, Dr. Yasko stated that he had experienced occasional chest tightness, intermittent gurgling while reclining, numbness in the left anterior chest, and mild fatigue (Def.'s SOMF ¶ 16; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 16). Dr. Yasko reported that he had returned to work, "has had 2 clinics and assisted in an 8-hour surgery, " and had "no difficulty other than mild fatigue" (Def.'s SOMF ¶ 16; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 16). He was instructed to return in six months for a CT scan of his chest and again at the one-year anniversary of his surgery to undergo a fiberoptic bronchoscopy (Def.'s SOMF ¶ 16; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 16).
On August 16, 2010, Dr. Yasko traveled by air from Chicago to Houston, and on August 18, 2010, Dr. Yasko flew from Houston to Mexico to speak at a medical conference (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 17; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 40). He arrived in Quintana Roo, Mexico around 4:00 pm and was greeted by a colleague, Dr. Carlos Cuervo Lozano, [7] who noted that Dr. Yasko appeared to be tired and perspiring (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 17; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 29). Dr. Lozano asked Dr. Yasko if he felt well, and Dr. Yasko replied affirmatively (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 29; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 29). Although there was a reception for conference attendees that night, Dr. Yasko did not attend, and at 5:00 a.m. the next morning, Dr. Lozano was summoned to Dr. Yasko's hotel room, where Dr. Lozano found him in respiratory failure (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 18; Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 29-30; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶¶ 29-30). Dr. Yasko was given artificial respiration until the ambulance arrived, but slipped into unconsciousness before he could be transported to a local hospital (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 18; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 30; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 30). Dr. Lozano did not accompany Dr. Yasko to the hospital because he had to attend to conference activities (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 30; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 30).
An ambulance took Dr. Yasko to Hospiten Hospital[8] in Playa Del Carmen, Quintana Roo, where he died around 7:00 a.m. that morning (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 19; Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 19, 31, 32; doc. #47: Standard Insurance Company's Response to Plaintiff's Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts ("Def.'s 56.1 Resp.") at ¶ 19). At the hospital, Dr. Oscar Hernandez Gea, the doctor who had attempted to save Dr. Yasko's life, certified the causes of death as massive pulmonary thromboembolism and lung cancer (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 19; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 20; Def.'s 56.1 Resp. at ¶ 19; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 20). In addition, Dr. Yasko's death certificate states that his death was due to natural causes (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 20; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 20). Dr. Lozano reported that he had not known that Dr. Yasko suffered from lung cancer and had undergone surgery, but only found this out when the doctors who attended to Dr. Yasko at the hospital so informed him, and because he saw an x-ray, which he said "showed [that] a pulmonary embolism was apparently the cause of [Dr. Yasko's] death" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 30; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 30). No x-rays were submitted to Standard, and no charges for x-rays appear on the hospital services invoice (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 33; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 33). No autopsy was performed, and Dr. Yasko's body was cremated (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 23; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 23).
On November 9, 2010, Plaintiff submitted a claim to Standard for basic and additional life insurance benefits, and basic and additional AD&D benefits (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 20; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 25; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 25). Standard obtained Dr. Yasko's medical records from Northwestern University Hospital, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the Hospital Riviera Maya and retained Diligence International Group to travel to Mexico to investigate his death (Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 26-27; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶¶ 26-27). The investigators obtained official death certificates, reviewed medical records, and interviewed hotel and hospital personnel, a United States Consulate official, and the owner of the funeral home that performed the embalming (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 27; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 27).
On February 14, 2011, Standard wrote Ms. Yasko a letter approving her claim for basic and additional life insurance benefits in the total amount of $1, 200, 000.00, plus interest (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 34; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 34). In that same letter, Standard notified Ms. Yasko that it was declining her claim for basic and additional AD&D benefits because it concluded that Dr. Yasko's death was not the result of bodily injuries sustained as a result of an accident (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 21; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 35). On October 24, 2011, Ms. Yasko, through her attorney, appealed Standard's decision declining AD&D benefits, asserting that Dr. Yasko's "extended demobilization" during air travel "caused a blood clot in his leg to be released and cause a pulmonary embolism" (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 22; Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 36-37; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶¶ 36-37; doc. #31: Appendix to Standard Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment Administrative Record, Volumes I-IX at STND XX-XXXX-XXXXX). Her attorney also contended that prolonged sitting in an airplane was "analogous" to being in a "car accident, which then caused a blood clot to dislodge and cause a heart attack" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 37; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 37; STND XX-XXXX-XXXXX). Ms. Yasko's attorney further stated, "There are many ways to be exposed to accidental circumstances which could cause a heart attack, including car accidents, electrocution, being exposed to drugs, etc. These plane trips are just another one" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 37; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 37; STND XX-XXXX-XXXXX).
With Ms. Yasko's appeal, she supplied Dr. Yasko's medical records for lung cancer treatment at MD Anderson Cancer Center, as well as a letter addressed "To whom it may concern, " signed by Dr. Yasko's colleague, Dr. Lozano, and a report prepared, at the request of her counsel, by Dr. Jesse Hall, Section Chief of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at the University of Chicago (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 22; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 38). In his letter, Dr. Lozano, stated that "[i]n my professional opinion, Dr. Yasko died of a massive pulmonary embolism due to the extensive air travel he experienced the week before his death, " and that "[h]is death was an unexpected sudden death which Alan Yasko did not foresee" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 42; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 42).
In Dr. Hall's report, he listed his qualifications as a "board certified internal medicine physician with a certification in critical care medicine" and opined that Dr. Yasko's death was caused by a massive pulmonary embolus unrelated to underlying lung cancer, because that had been "cured" by the surgical removal of the tumor in March 2010 (STND XX-XXXXX-XXXXX to 584; Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 22). Dr. Hall asserted that the surgery had been distant enough in time to have had "no effect on Dr. Yasko's predisposition to develop pulmonary embolism" (STND XX-XXXXX-XXXXX to 584; Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 22). Dr. Hall stated that the tumor had been "a benign carcinoid with no evidence of spread to lymph nodes and no residual tissue remaining after lobectomy" (STND XX-XXXXX-XXX to 584). Instead, Dr. Hall asserted that the risk factors for Dr. Yasko's "event was his prolonged airline travel, coupled to his age and body weight (his body mass index at the time of his admission to MD Anderson had been approximately 31, signaling very modest obesity)" ( Id. at 584). Finally, Dr. Hall concluded that Dr. Yasko's death "was not the result of the progression of an identifiable disease, but rather should be considered to be accidental in the sense that it resulted from the events of daily life coupled to misfortune" ( Id. ).
Standard consulted Dr. Bradley Fancher, a physician who is board-certified in internal medicine, who evaluated the information in the administrative record (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 43; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 43). In his December 6, 2011 Physician Consultant Memo, Dr. Fancher opined that "with no diagnostic tests done at the time of his death and with no autopsy being performed[, ] it is impossible to arrive at any conclusion with regard to the cause of [Dr. Yasko's] demise" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 44; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 44). Dr. Fancher stated that "multiple potential medical explanations" exist, including "myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, dissecting aneurysm, a ruptured aneurysm, a GI bleed, " as well as that Dr. Yasko might have had a "metastatic carcinoid and... a hypercoagulable state" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 44; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 44). Dr. Fancher explicitly mentioned Dr. Lozano's opinion and accepted "Dr. Lozano's postulate that [Dr. Yasko] died from a deep venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism as one of the many possibilities that might have caused the claimant's death" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 44; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 44).
Dr. Fancher further opined that Dr. Yasko had not been subjected to any trauma because taking a routine airplane flight does not constitute an accident:
The claimant was not exposed to any undue trauma or unusual trauma. Flying on an airplane, of course, is a common everyday event and is neither accidental nor does it involve any trauma. While sitting for prolonged periods of time does reduce venous return in the lower extremities and predisposes individuals to thromboembolism, the same situation happens if individuals sit for long periods of time at home, as opposed to being on an airplane. While venous stasis and reduction of venous return are predisposing factors for venous thrombosis, this circumstance does not constitute an accident. I would not consider known risk factors for venous thromboembolism to be considered "accidental" events, they are simply risk factors.
(Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 45; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 45). Dr. Fancher's memorandum makes no reference to the letter that Ms. Yasko had submitted from Dr. Hall.
On December 13, 2011, Standard informed Ms. Yasko of its final determination upholding the decision to decline her claim for AD&D benefits, stating: "We have not been provided with satisfactory Proof of Loss as required under the terms of the policy to pay the accidental death benefit" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 46; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 46). Standard justified its conclusion, explaining that the AD&D insurance has an exclusion for deaths caused by disease or illness: "No AD&D benefits are payable for a death caused from disease or illness, which include medical conditions such as heart attack and stroke... and would also include pulmonary embolism" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 47; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 47). Standard also concluded that the circumstances of Dr. Yasko's death did not constitute sustaining "bodily injuries as a result of an accident" as required by the AD&D policy provisions:
Although Dr. Yasko travelled by air on the day prior to his death, he did not suffer a bodily injury from an accident. Air travel is considered normal activity; whereas, an accident is an unexpected or unplanned event such as motor vehicle accident causing bodily injury or death by an unavoidable circumstance.
(Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 48; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 48).
The Court finds that there are no disputed issues of material fact, [9] and that judgment can be entered as a matter of law. "Judicial review of an ERISA administrator's benefits determination is de novo unless the plan grants the administrator discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits or to construe the terms of the plan.'" Cerentano v. UMWA Health and Retirement Funds, 735 F.3d 976, 981 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting Holmstrom v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 615 F.3d 758, 766 (7th Cir. 2010) (citing Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 115 (1989)). Here, the parties agree that Standard's policy grants such discretionary authority to the plan administrator (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 11; Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 9; Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 9). Consequently, we ask only whether the plan administrator's decision was arbitrary and capricious. Cerentano, 735 F.3d at 981; Tompkins v. Cent. Laborers' Pension Fund, 712 F.3d 995, 999 (7th Cir. 2013).
Under the arbitrary and capricious standard, the Court will uphold a plan administrator's denial of benefits as long as there is "rational support in the record" for the decision. Becker v. Chrysler LLC Health Care Benefits Plan, 691 F.3d 879, 885 (7th Cir. 2012). The Court must give deference to the plan administrator's interpretation of ambiguous plan language. See id. at 890; see also Weitzenkamp v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 661 F.3d 323, 329 (7th Cir. 2011) ("an administrator's interpretation is given great deference and will not be disturbed if it is based on a reasonable interpretation of the plan's language'") (quoting Wetzler v. Ill. CPA Soc'y & Found. Ret. Income Plan, 586 F.3d 1053, 1057 (7th Cir.2009)); Hess v. Reg-Ellen Mach. Tool Corp., 423 F.3d 653, 662 (7th Cir. 2005) (courts "must view the contractual ambiguity through a lens that gives broad discretion to the plan administrator to interpret the plan") (citation omitted). It is not the Court's role to make judgment calls; rather, the plan "administrator's decision will not be overturned unless it is downright unreasonable.'" Edwards v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 639 F.3d 355, 360 (7th Cir. 2011) (quoting Davis v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 444 F.3d 569, 576 (7th Cir. 2006)); see also Green v. UPS Health & Welfare Package for Retired Employees, 595 F.3d 734, 738 (7th Cir. 2010) (the plan administrator's decision "is not arbitrary and capricious if it falls within the range of reasonable interpretations").
Although our review is highly deferential, it "is not a rubber stamp." Holmstrom, 615 F.3d at 766. The plan administrator must give specific reasons for a denial, communicate those reasons to the claimant, and afford the claimant a "full and fair review." Id. (quoting Tate v. Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees of Champion Int'l Corp. No. 506, 545 F.3d 555, 559 (7th Cir. 2008)). Among other considerations, the Court must weigh an administrator's conflict of interest as "a key consideration." Holmstrom, 615 F.3d at 766-67. A conflict of interest arises "when the administrator has both the discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits and the obligation to pay benefits when due." Jenkins v. Price Waterhouse Long Term Disability Plan, 564 F.3d 856, 860-61 (7th Cir. 2009). Here, Standard has both the discretionary authority to determine benefits and the obligation to pay. The presence of such a conflict, which exists in this case, will "act as a tiebreaker when the other factors are closely balanced." Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105, 117 (2008).
Ms. Yasko makes two primary arguments in support of her motion for summary judgment. First, she contends that Standard failed to provide a full and fair review in denying her claim because it failed to send Dr. Hall's report to its consultant Dr. Fancher and failed to articulate grounds for not accepting Dr. Hall's findings. Second, she asserts Standard's denial of her claim was arbitrary and capricious because Dr. Yasko's death, as a result of a pulmonary embolism caused by his air travel, was sudden and unexpected and therefore "accidental." We address each of these arguments in turn.
Ms. Yasko contends that in order for Standard to have afforded a full and fair review of the denial of her claim, it was required to have considered all of the evidence she supplied (Pl.'s Mem. at 4-5). The Supreme Court has observed that "ERISA imposes higher-than-marketplace quality standards on insurers" and requires that plan administrators "provide a full and fair review' of claim denials." Glenn, 554 U.S. at 115. Ms. Yasko argues that Standard violated that obligation by failing to send Dr. Hall's report to its consultant, Dr. Fancher, and by failing to articulate grounds for not accepting Dr. Hall's findings (Pl.'s Mem. at 4-7). In essence, she contends that because Standard had a structural conflict of interest here (both the discretionary authority to determine benefits and the obligation to pay), its failure to forward the Hall report to Dr. Fancher tips the balance in favor of finding that its denial of her claim was arbitrary and capricious.
Though Ms. Yasko asserts that Standard's expert, Dr. Fancher, "apparently" did not review the report of her expert, Dr. Hall (Pl.'s SOMF at ¶ 24), we find that the record is ambiguous on this point. Standard's December 13, 2011 letter denying the claim for AD&D benefits acknowledges that Ms. Yasko submitted "a copy of Dr. Yasko's medical records and letters containing medical opinions from Jesse Hall, M.D. and Carlos E. Cuervo Lozano, M.D., citing Dr. Yasko died of a pulmonary embolism caused by extensive air travel the week preceding his death'" (STND XX-XXXXX-XXXXX). The letter goes on to state: "As part of the administrative review process, we had a physician consultant, Bradley Fancher, M.D., board certified in internal medicine, comment on the information received" ( Id. ). The letter implies that Standard forwarded the material it had received from Ms. Yasko to Dr. Fancher. At the beginning of Dr. Fancher's memorandum, he states: "I reviewed pertinent medical records" (STND XX-XXXXX-XXXXX). But, the remainder of his memorandum contains no mention of Dr. Hall's report, focusing solely on Dr. Lozano's opinion instead ( Id. at 58-59). Standard offers no illumination on this fact, providing only the opaque statement that Dr. Fancher "evaluated the information in the Administrative Record" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶ 43), which Ms. Yasko admitted (Pl.'s Resp. at ¶ 43).
It would have been prudent for Standard to have forwarded all of Ms. Yasko's submissions to its expert for his consideration. Perhaps it did so, and Dr. Fancher reviewed both Dr. Hall's report and Dr. Lozano's letter, but opted to comment on only one of two somewhat duplicative submissions. If so, his failure to explicitly address a piece of the record does not require us to reject his opinion or to overturn Standard's denial of the claim. See Davis, 444 F.3d at 578 ("there is nothing in ERISA or our precedent requiring doctors to write like lawyers or plan administrators").
But even assuming that Standard neglected to forward the Hall report to Dr. Fancher (or that it did send the report but Dr. Fancher overlooked it), we nevertheless do not deem this omission a sufficient basis for overturning Standard's denial of her claim. First, the conclusions in Dr. Hall's report - that Dr. Yasko died of a pulmonary embolism and that it was an accident caused by his air travel - are substantially the same as Dr. Lozano's opinion, which Dr. Fancher clearly considered (doc. #48: Standard Insurance Company's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment ("Def.'s Resp. Mem.") at 8). We find that Dr. Fancher's explicit consideration of Dr. Lozano's opinion satisfies us that Standard provided full and fair review of the theory also raised in the Hall report. See Marantz v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. v. Long Term Disability Plan, 687 F.3d 320, 328 (7th Cir. 2012) (ERISA "does not appear to require the plan to identify each and every piece of evidence that it relied upon in its decision to deny benefits"); Meade v. Nat'l City Corp. Welfare Plan, 394 Fed.App'x 308, 314 (7th Cir. 2010) ("nothing in this report was so compelling or different from that in other referenced documentation that the failure to mention the report means we would set aside the decision").
Second, although Ms. Yasko also argues that the plan administrator did not discuss Dr. Hall's report, she does not contend that the plan administrator failed to consider Dr. Hall's report (Pl.'s Mem. at 6-7). In fact, the plan administrator specifically acknowledged having received that report ( Id. at 6; STND XX-XXXXX-XXXXX), but Ms. Yasko complains that Standard "merely brushed aside" Dr. Hall's conclusions in favor of Dr. Fancher's conclusions without explicitly addressing Dr. Hall's report (Pl.'s Mem. at 6-7). Again, we do not find this sufficient basis to conclude that Standard did not afford a full and fair review.
Third, and most importantly, Standard explained that its policy language excluded deaths resulting from a disease or illness, such as pulmonary embolism, and that even though the air travel may have triggered the pulmonary embolism, uneventful air travel does not qualify as an "unexpected or unplanned event such as motor vehicle accident causing bodily injury or death by an unavoidable circumstance" (Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 47-48; see Def.'s Resp. at 2-7). In other words, Standard did not need to discuss Dr. Hall's conclusion that Dr. Yasko's cancer had been cured and that his air travel triggered the pulmonary embolism, because even assuming that Dr. Hall was correct, his opinion did not affect Standard's interpretation of its policy language to exclude death caused by an embolism triggered by air travel. And, to the extent Dr. Hall ventured farther by drawing the conclusion that Dr. Yasko's death qualified as "accidental, " Standard was not compelled to accept a medical professional's interpretation of its policy language. See Sellers v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 627 F.3d 627, 632 (7th Cir. 2010) ("construction of the term accident' should be left to common understanding as revealed in common speech'").
We do not find this to be a borderline case in which evidence of the structural conflict tips the balance in Ms. Yasko's favor. See Glenn, 554 U.S. at 117 ("will act as a tiebreaker when the other factors are closely balanced"). Consequently, the failure of Standard's expert, Dr. Fancher, to mention Dr. Hall's report is insufficient to render Standard's determination arbitrary and capricious.
Standard's position is that, even when accepting as true that Dr. Yasko died of a pulmonary embolism caused by his air travel, [10] those circumstances do not qualify as a death that resulted from an "accident" under the terms of the Standard's policy (Def.'s Mem. at 11-16; Def.'s Resp. at 3-70. For the reasons that follow, we cannot conclude that Standard's position is "downright unreasonable."
Because the Plan is governed by ERISA, federal common law principles of contract interpretation apply. Sellers, 627 F.3d at 632; Senkier v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 948 F.2d 1050, 1051 (7th Cir. 1991). Those principles require that Plan terms be interpreted in "an ordinary and popular sense, as [they] would [be understood by] a person of average intelligence and experience.'" Sellers, 627 F.3d at 632 (quoting Cannon v. Wittek Cos. Intern., 60 F.3d 1282, 1284 (7th Cir. 1995)). Consistent with that rule, the Seventh Circuit has stated that "the construction of the term accident' should be left to common understanding as revealed in common speech.'" Id. (quoting Senkier, 948 F.2d at 1052).
The Seventh Circuit grappled with defining "accident" in Senkier v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., 948 F.2d 1050 (7th Cir. 1991), an ERISA case in which the insurance policy provided benefits for accidental injuries that cause the death of the insured. There, the appeals court categorized a "medical mishap" during treatment of a disease (a broken IV catheter that pierced the insured's heart) as an illness, rather than an accident. Id. at 1054. In reaching this conclusion, the Seventh Circuit surveyed prior case law that distinguished between accidental means and accidental results, but ultimately elected to eschew this kind of line-drawing in favor of leaving "the question to the common understanding as revealed in common speech'":
A lay person has a clear if inarticulate understanding of the difference between an accidental death and a death from an illness, and that understanding will not be altered or improved by head-spinning judicial efforts at definition,
Id. at 1052-53. In addition, the appeals court observed that simply because the death was "sudden and unexpected" would not resolve the question of whether it resulted from an accident, because "many illnesses kill swiftly and without warning." Id. at 1053 (citation omitted).
More recently, in Sellers v. Zurich American Insurance Co ., the Seventh Circuit reaffirmed the Senkier rule that the construction of the term "accident' should be left to "common understanding.'" 627 F.3d at 633 (quoting Senkier ).[11] In Sellers, the Seventh Circuit considered an ERISA case in which the insured had undergone surgery in November 2006 to remove a wire that had been inserted during a prior surgery to repair a work-related knee injury. 627 F.3d at 629-30. Nine days after the surgery to remove the wire, the insured died from an "acute pulmonary embolism with infarct, caused by his immobilization following the operation." Id. at 629. The accidental death and dismemberment policy at issue covered accidental deaths occurring within 365 days of the accident. Id. The insurance company denied coverage because the surgeon had noted that the wire break was expected, and therefore it had concluded that the breakage could not be considered an accident. Id. at 631. The district court found that determination reasonable. Id.
Although the Sellers court held that the plan gave the administrator discretion to construe its policy terms and applied an "arbitrary and capricious" standard to the review of the company's construction of the Plan term "accident, " it applied a de novo standard of review to the insurance company's interpretation of Senkier. Id. at 631-32. The Sellers court found that the insurance company's reliance on what a medical professional would consider unexpected or fortuitous for its construction of "accident" was arbitrary, because Senkier dictates that the proper focus is whether "the average person would say that the decedent had died in an accident' or not." Id. at 632 (quoting Senkier, 948 F.2d at 1054). Despite the insurance company's error in relying on an expert to interpret the plan language, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the insurance company's denial of coverage because under Senkier, "injuries resulting from medical treatment' are not accidents as that term is used in AD&D policies." Id. at 634 (quoting Senkier, 948 F.2d at 1051-52).
Against the backdrop of these Seventh Circuit's precedents, we consider Standard's December 13, 2011 letter rejecting Ms. Yasko's appeal. In that letter, Standard explained that its AD&D coverage differs from regular life insurance because coverage under the terms of the AD&D policy requires:
sustaining bodily injuries as a result of an accident. No AD&D benefits are payable for a death caused from disease or illness, which include medical conditions such as heart attack and stroke... and would also include pulmonary embolism. Although Dr. Yasko travelled by air on the day prior to his death, he did not suffer a bodily injury from an accident. Air travel is considered a normal activity; whereas an accident is an unexpected or unplanned event such as motor vehicle accident causing bodily injury or death by an unavoidable circumstance. We do not agree with your statement that a car accident, which may cause a blood clot to dislodge and cause a heart attack, is analogous to flying in an airplane.
(STND XX-XXXXX-XXXXX; Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 47, 48).
Standard concedes that Dr. Hall's theory that Dr. Yasko died as a result of a blood clot that developed in his leg from sitting during air travel and subsequently migrated to his pulmonary artery "is viable conjecture about the biological sequence that led to [Dr.] Yasko's pulmonary embolism and death" (Def.'s Mem. at 12; see also Def.'s Resp. Mem.at 1, 3, 8-9 (theory was "medically plausible" and "medically viable")). But Standard points out that its policy only covers an insured who "sustain[s] bodily injuries as a result of an accident, " and does not cover injury or death caused by disease or illness (Def.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 5, 6; Pl.'s SOMF at ¶¶ 9, 10; Def.'s Resp. Mem.at 1-2, 4-5, 7-8). Standard asserts that an uneventful airplane trip does not qualify as an "accident" (Def.'s Mem. at 12-13; Def.'s Resp. Mem.at 4). Standard reasons that any prolonged inactivity, such as sitting in a chair, lying in a bed, or riding in a car for a long time, could potentially trigger a fatal pulmonary embolism, and that in such a circumstance, one would not characterize the death as the result of bodily injuries sustained in an accident (Def.'s Mem. at 12-13). Because "applying a common understanding of language used in everyday speech, " one would not say that an embolism caused by air travel constitutes "a bodily injury sustained as a result of an accident, as required by the Plan's AD&D coverage, " Standard argues that it reasonably concluded "that [Dr.] Yasko died of natural causes, or an illness, and not as a result of bodily injuries sustained as a result of an accident" ( Id. ).
In contrast, Ms. Yasko contends that, absent an explicit policy definition, a death should be deemed "accidental" when it is sudden and unexpected (Pl.'s Mem. at 8-9; Pl.'s Reply at 3) (citing Wickman v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co., 908 F.2d 1077 (1st Cir. 1990) and Sellers, 627 F.3d at 632). She asserts that Santaella v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 123 F.3d 456 (7th Cir. 1997) "directs that a death is accidental' when the decedent subjectively held an objective expectation of survival" (Pl.'s Reply at 3; Pl.'s Mem. at 9-10).
We agree with Standard that although Dr. Yasko's death was sudden and unexpected, it was reasonable for Standard to conclude that his death was not the consequence of an accident, as required by the language of its coverage clause. We need not pass on whether Ms. Yasko's preferred definition of accident also might be a reasonable one. Even were that the case, the possibility of multiple reasonable interpretations of that word in the policy does not make it unreasonable for Standard to select one over the other. Indeed, when confronted with competing interpretations that both may be reasonable, it is the responsibility of the plan administrator to make a choice between them. See Becker, 691 F.3d at 893 ("Although [the claimant's] interpretation may be reasonable insofar as it has some support in the record, we cannot say that the Plan's interpretation, which has at least as much support, is unreasonable given our deferential standard of review"); Frye v. Thompson Steel Co., Inc., 657 F.3d 488, 493 (7th Cir. 2011) ("it is not our function to decide whether we would reach the same conclusion as the administrator") (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The arbitrary and capricious standard of review gives the plan administrator room to make that choice.
Here, even assuming that Ms. Yasko's proposed interpretation is reasonable, we cannot say that the plan administrator was "downright unreasonable" in choosing the interpretation it did. As Standard points out, Ms. Yasko's proposal to apply an "expectation test" could include within the definition of "accident" deaths caused by heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms and the like, which might similarly be triggered by uneventful air travel. These examples seem to us as occurring beyond the common understanding of "accident." And as the Seventh Circuit has observed, "[d]eath is almost always accidental in the sense of unintended by the deceased, so if an accidental result sufficed, coverage would be assured regardless of the cause of death." Senkier, 948 F.3d at 1052.
The parties have not cited and we have not found any Seventh Circuit case law that directly addresses whether coverage clauses in accidental death insurance policies cover embolisms triggered by air travel. Consequently, to support the reasonableness of its interpretation of the term "accident, " Standard offered several out-of-circuit ERISA cases that draw upon how courts have construed "accident" in claims for compensation for death caused by deep vein thrombosis or other illness triggered by air travel (Def.'s Mem. at 13-15, citing McAuley v. Federal Ins. Co., No. 4:05CV1826 AGF, 2009 WL 913510 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 31, 2009); Williams v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 12cv01590 AJB (MDD), 2013 WL 1431822 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2013); and Appeldorn v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co., No. 1:09-cv-069, 2010 WL 3475915 (D. N.D. Sept. 2, 2010)).
These cases look to the Warsaw Convention for guidance on the meaning of the word "accident" in situations involving air travel. Article 17 of the Convention makes air carriers liable for death or bodily injury suffered by a passenger "if the accident which caused the damage so sustained took place on board the aircraft." Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392, 397 (1985) (English translation of Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention; the original is in French). The Supreme Court has held that under Article 17 an "accident" is "an unexpected or unusual event or happening that is external to the passenger." Id. at 405; see also Olympic Airways v. Husain, 540 U.S. 644, 651 n.8, 652 (2004).
We, too, find the Warsaw Convention analysis helpful in assessing the reasonableness of Standard's interpretation of the term "accident." "The fact that this reasoning was presented in a Warsaw Convention case does not make it any less cogent when applied to the present case to determine whether [the insurance company's] denial of benefits was reasonable. If there were a contrary body of ERISA law dealing with deaths from DVT following long flights, such authority would govern here, but Plaintiffs have not cited, nor has the Court found such a body of ERISA case law." McAuley, 2009 WL 913510, at *18.
In particular, we find especially instructive the court's reasoning in McAuley, an ERISA case involving facts and arguments similar to those in the present case. 2009 WL 913510. In McAuley, the plan administrator had denied accidental death benefits for an insured whose death resulted from "pulmonary thromboembuli, caused by deep vein thrombosis" several hours after an airplane trip from Ireland to St. Louis, Missouri. Id. at *1. The insurance company argued that the death was not caused by an accident and that, in the alternative, the death resulted from illness, disease, or bodily malfunction. Id. The accident insurance policies at issue provided compensation for accidents resulting from a covered "Hazard, " which included a "Business Travel Hazard" provision, and stated that "Accident includes unavoidable exposure to elements arising from a covered Hazard, " and listed an array of exclusions, such as "sickness, diseases, or infections of any kind...." Id. at *3. The insured's death certificate listed arteriosclerotic heart disease as the "immediate cause" of death, but an autopsy revealed "extensive and massive bilateral acute pulmonary embolism, moderate hypertensive cardiovascular disease, up to 40% stenosis in various arteries, and mild emphysema" and concluded that "the immediate cause of death was extensive and massive acute bilateral pulmonary thromboembuli.'" Id. at *5 (quoting the autopsy report).
The plaintiffs contended that the definition of "Business Travel Hazard" in the policy covered the insured's death by pulmonary embolism, which was caused by his air travel, and further asserted that it fell within the definition of unavoidable exposure to elements arising from a covered hazard. Id. The plaintiffs further argued that the prevailing federal common law of ERISA holds that "a death is accidental if the insured [subjectively] did not expect an injury similar in type or kind to that suffered, ' but not if a reasonable person, with the background and characteristics similar to the insured, would have viewed the injury as highly likely to occur as a result of the insured's intentional conduct.'" Id. at *9 (quoting Wickman., 908 F.2d at 1088-89). Applying this expectation test, the plaintiffs argued that the insured's "death was accidental because it can fairly be assumed that he did not subjectively believe that his international flight would kill him, and this expectation was reasonable." Id. at *10.
Because the McAuley court found the term "accident" to be "disarmingly difficult to define, " it relied on the Supreme Court's Warsaw Convention analysis from Olympic Airways, and determined that the insured's death was not the result of an accident because there was "no unusual, unexpected event external to [the insured]." Id. at *18. The court also found that it was reasonable for the insurance company to deny coverage based on the policy exclusions for disease, illness, or bodily malfunctions. Id. at *22. In the final analysis, the court concluded that even under the more demanding de novo standard of review, the insurance company's interpretation was "not only reasonable, but also correct." Id. at *24; see also Williams, 2013 WL 1431822, at **2, 12 (applying de novo standard and finding that death caused by pulmonary thromboembolism after prolonged air travel was not covered as an accident under policy language that defined bodily injury as "sustained as a direct result of an unintended, unanticipated accident that is external to the body"); Appeldorn, 2010 WL 3475915, at **4-5 (under de novo review, court relied on Warsaw Convention case law reasoning to hold that "developing the disease of meningitis on an ordinary and uneventful airplane flight does not qualify as an injury' or an accident'" under policy language providing coverage for "bodily injury resulting directly and independently of all other causes from accident").
These out-of-circuit cases further support the reasonableness of Standard's interpretation of its policy language. Under the arbitrary and capricious standard of review, our role is solely to decide whether Standard's definition was "downright unreasonable." Davis, 444 F.3d at 576; see also Komperda v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co., No. 02 C 5359, 2003 WL 21148023, at *7 (N.D. Ill. May 14, 2003) (even though plaintiff's definition of accident as "an event the result of which is unintended from the perspective of the participant" was reasonable and had even been adopted by some courts, defendant's decision to deny benefits was still not arbitrary and capricious). We find that Standard's construction of the term "accident" was "within the range of reasonable interpretations, " see Green, 595 F.3d at 738, and therefore it was not downright unreasonable. Consequently, we find Standard's decision to deny benefits was not arbitrary and capricious.
For the foregoing reasons, the defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. #30) is granted. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (doc. #27) is denied. Judgment is hereby entered on behalf of the defendant. This case is terminated.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
£55,000 Offers over
Two bedroom lower cottage flat in need of a degree of modernisation comprising reception hallway, good sized lounge, kitchen, two double sized bedrooms and bathroom. The property is further complemented by double glazing and garden grounds. Moidart Road is ideally situated for a range of south-side amenities and offers excellent public transport links. Viewing at the earliest is highly recommended to avoid disappointment. EER BAND E
Lounge 15' x 11'1" (4.57m x 3.38m).
Kitchen 10'1" x 9'3" (3.07m x 2.82m).
Bedroom 1 13' x 12' (3.96m x 3.66m).
Bedroom 2 12' x 10' (3.66m x 3.05m).
This house description is based upon information supplied by the owner, or on behalf of the owner. These property particulars are produced in good faith and do not constitute or form part of any contract. s1homes do not take any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this document.
If a property value displays '0', don't worry it just means no properties have been sold in that area during that time.
Sold house price data is supplied to us by the Registers of Scotland, a government department responsible for compiling and maintaining property registers, every month. There can be a delay of up to 3 months from when a property is sold to being recorded with Registers of Scotland. We provide house price data for your information only, we do not accept any liability for any errors. If you have noticed any incorrect information, please contact Registers of Scotland.


text:
New 'Avengers 2' Clip Features Iron Man Throwing Down With Ultron
Avengers: Age of Ultron has already begun screening for critics and it has been receiving very positive responses, which is definitely not doing anything to deter our personal hype from reaching unfair and dangerous levels. Thankfully, Marvel has thrown the rest of us a bone with this new clip from the film, which features enough of that typical Joss Whedon wit and enough big action to satiate us for, oh, another day or so.
SNL Lets Billy Crystal Swing by Weekend Update
Vanessa Bayer's Jacob the Bar Mitzvah Boy has been a regular character on SNL's Weekend Update for quite some time now, so it was about time for us meet the family of everyone's favorite awkward, overly prepared Jewish kid. Coinciding with the end of Passover, the show brought the great Billy Crystal onto the show as Jacob's equally awkward father.
Weekend Box Office Report: 'Furious 7' Smashes April Records
The early estimates for the opening weekend gross of Furious 7 are all over the place and we probably won't have a definitive number until tomorrow, when the dust finally settles and everyone gets a chance to breathe. However, this one thing we know for sure: the seventh film in the Fast and Furious series didn't just shatter in-franchise records, it shattered records for any April release.
SNL Lets 'The Walking Dead' Star Norman Reedus Crash "Weekend Update"
Since The Walking Dead just ended its fifth season and it's still one of the biggest shows in the history of television, it makes sense that SNL would pause to talk about it. After all, what good is the "Weekend Update" segment if the anchors don't occasionally stop to talk about what's big in popular culture? And what good is SNL if it can't get one of the most popular actors from The Walking Dead to stop by for a minute-long cameo?
SNL Asks Michael Keaton to Play Batman and Beetlejuice Again
Most of the time, the SNL opening monologue is a formality and a tradition, a road bump on the way to the actual good parts of an episode. It feels like something the guest host does because he has to, not because anyone on the writing staff actually had a good idea. And that's why last night's monologue was such a joyous surprise: it was not only the best monologue of the season, but the best sketch of the whole night.
The Next 'Star Wars: Episode 7' Trailer Will Premiere at Star Wars Celebration
Since Star Wars: Episode 7 is probably the most anticipated movie of the past decade or so, Disney and Lucasfilm were wise to turn the premiere of the first trailer into a bonafide event. Fans flocked to theaters early in the morning just to catch a glimpse of the first footage from the film. Some crazy people (including yours truly) went to a special event where it was screened 40 times in a row. So how do you follow that up? By premiering the next trailer at the world's biggest Star Wars fan convention and then attaching the preview to the second most anticipated movie of the year.
Weekend Box Office Report: The Box Office Goes 'Home'
In one of the strongest box office weekends of 2015 so far, both Home and Get Hard opened strong while Insurgent and Cinderella continued to perform well. This was the rare weekend that literally offered something for everyone, with R-rated comedies and animated family fare exceeding expectations.
'Star Trek 3' Casts Idris Elba as the Mysterious New Villain
Man, the rebooted Star Trek movie series really has this whole "casting actors we really like" thing down. The latest report from Star Trek 3 has the great Idris Elba cast as the movie's villain, whose identity remains, for the moment, a mystery.
Watch Tom Hanks Recreate All of His Movies in 8 Minutes on the 'Late Late Show'
The Late Late Show With James Corden made its grand debut last night, with seemingly every celebrity in existence popping up to say hello. But for his first official guest, Corden snagged everyone's favorite actor: the one and only Tom Hanks. More importantly, he got Tom Hanks to get really silly and there are few things better than Hanks throwing caution to the wind and embracing his inner comedian. In this case, he got the two-time Oscar winner to re-enact all of his movies in less than eight minutes.
Weekend Box Office Report: 'Insurgent' Can't Beat 'Divergent' Opening
What does a movie studio want out of its sequels? Is a sequel a failure if it simply matches its predecessor or does it need to make more money? That's the big question that's swirling around Insurgent, which made almost exactly as much as Divergent did one year ago. Seriously: there's only a $500,000 difference in their opening weekends. So is Insurgent a success or a disappointment?


text:
Odoo Help
This community is for beginners and experts willing to share their Odoo knowledge. It's not a forum to discuss ideas, but a knowledge base of questions and their answers.
Get Wage Of Employee ?
Byon 11/25/13, 4:25 AM • 570 views
Ali Abdelmonem Mustafa Amer
Hi All
I Want To Select The Wage Of Employee And Show It In Field
I Have Model >> Category Also Have A Relation With hr.employee And I Want To Get The Wage Of employee And Show It In The Form View
Thanks A lot
Your Answer
Please try to give a substantial answer. If you wanted to comment on the question or answer, just use the commenting tool. Please remember that you can always revise your answers - no need to answer the same question twice. Also, please don't forget to vote - it really helps to select the best questions and answers!
About This Community
This community is for professionals and enthusiasts of our products and services. Read Guidelines
Question tools
0 follower(s)
|Asked: 11/25/13, 4:25 AM
|Seen: 570 times
|Last updated: 3/16/15, 8:10 AM


text:
An unobstructed afocal scanning system design employing two off-axis parabolic reflectors as relay optics between two flat scan mirrors is proposed and investigated using OSLO optical software. It is found that, with a symmetric arrangement of the parabolic reflectors and appropriate selection of the first scan mirror rotational axis, the system provides linear scan lines at the image surface and excellent point spread function results in all scan positions. The design is functionally equivalent to a single-mirror scan engine and superior in every metric to a comparable dimension spherical mirror arrangement. This design is suited to two-dimensional laser scan engines and for confocal and two-photon microscopy in particular.
© 2009 Optical Society of AmericaFull Article | PDF Article
Related Articles
Olof Bryngdahl and Wai-Hon Lee
Appl. Opt. 15(1) 183-194 (1976)
Leo Beiser
Appl. Opt. 34(31) 7307-7317 (1995)
R. J. Anderson and C. Larson
Appl. Opt. 10(7) 1605-1608 (1971)


text:
The chair of the project steering group, Juha Pölönen, Export Sales Director from Finnwind was impressed by the results of Connect project; according to him highly relevant market information has been collected and useful networks been established.
Doranova's vice-president Jarno Laitinen emphasized that Finnish SME's cannot afford to ignore the market opportunities in Africa as European market are rapidly saturated. Connect-project partner from South-Africa Ronelle Potgieter (InnoVenton) highlighted the high quality of the Finnish renewable energy technologies, although said need to be careful for not overdesigning products for the African markets.
The project was funded by Tekes Groove program. Tekes representative Pia Salokoski told that together with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs they are planning to open a new funding instrument to support research and development targeted to the developing countries. The aim is to combine the interest of Finnish trade and the long-term experiences of the developmental assistance and to promote business with impact.
During the seminar, a student co-operative was officially launched which will offer, for example, market research services for Finnish companies interested in African markets. The co-operative is open for all FUAS students and alumna's.
Further information
Birgit Aurela, project manager, Laurea
tel. 040 566 2910
Sanna Nuutila


text:
Not everyone has a bread machine in the home but I thought I would include this book for those who do. Audrey loves to use the bread machine as it is simple and she gets to pour all of the ingredients in. Like cooking with a crock pot, the bread machine allows the toddler to be involved in most aspects of food preparation. My favorite bread machine cookbook is The Complete Bread Machine Bakery Book, for obvious reasons. It really is an all encompassing book. Here are some pictures of Audrey's first attempts at using the Bread Machine. We have come such a long way since then. Here is a recipe we like for Onion Soup Bread:
- 1 1/4 cups buttermilk
- 2 tbsp unsulphured molasses
- 2 tbsp unsalted butter or canola oil
- 1 pkg dehydrated onion soup
- 2 cups unbleached all-purpose flour
- 1/2 cup cormeal
- dash of salt (optional)
- 1 1/2 tsp active dry yeast
Pour the buttermilk into the baking pan of your bread machine and add the molasses, butter or canola oil, onion soup mix, flour, cornmeal, and salt if desired. Distribute the yeast according to the instructions given for the particular bread machine you have. Bake on a quick cycle.
Audrey's Tasks:
- Pour all ingredients into the bread machine
- Push the button to start the baking cycle
- Gather ingredients
- Assist Audrey in putting ingredients into bread machine


text:
× View Today's Deals
You missed it This great deal for Cohen's Fashion Optical is over. But don't despair, we've got more great deals every day.
Related Deals That You May Like
Eden Day Spa
Facial or Massage Spa Package
NYC Midtown$125$65
TLC Laser Eye Centers
$1,000 to Spend Toward Lasik Eye Surgery
NYC Midtown$1,000$100
Aaron Emanuel Salon
Balayage Package
NYC Midtown$360$120
Infinity Laser Spa
Year of Unlimited Laser Hair-Removal Treatments
NYC Midtown$1,200$99.99
back by popular demand:
Cohen's Fashion Optical
Eye Exam + $300 Towards Prescription Glasses
deal over
deal over!
From its prime Murray Hill location at 36th and Fifth Avenue, this 85-year-old shop will help you up your specs appeal:
• $25 ($375 value) for an eye exam and $300 toward prescription glasses
• See like you haven't seen before with lenses personalized to what you need
• Offers frames from designer brands like Prada, Gucci, Versace, and more
"All of the staff are extremely helpful and genuinely nice, and the assortment of glasses at this location was very nice." - LivingSocial Member
PAID VALUE EXPIRES ON December 8, 2021
PROMOTIONAL VALUE EXPIRES ON November 14, 2014