text:
Hotels in Beznar
Hotel reservation
Hotel rooms in Beznar
There are not so many hotel rooms in Beznar, just 1, still everyone can find an offer to suit his choice. The most common offers in this city are guest houses, they count 1 out of 1, and their prevalent location is central district. According to our practice, it is the most profitable to book a hotel in the south of Beznar, as it is the location of the hotels with optimal cost and quality offers along with the cheap hotels. Taking into account the small size of the city, there is no need to dwell hotel reservation on the location: the road to the city center would take less then half an hour, so one can book a hotel in any district of Beznar. The most populated with hotels district of Beznar is the south, 100% of cheap hotel rooms are concentrated here. Beznar is a truly multifaceted city, here everyone can find a hotel of his choice: a business person, a young couple or a family with little children. Take a look at our selection of the cheap hotel rooms in Beznar to make a well-informed choice for your reservation!
Beznar cheap hotels
Guest Houses
All cheap hotels in Beznar
Best hotels in Beznar
Hotels in Beznar are spread around the city within the distance of 0.6 kilometers. The most popular accommodations in Beznar is
Holiday Home Casa Guapa, Valle de Lecrin
located in a 0.6 kilometers from the city center.
The best hotels are here and now. Try them!
All cities in Spain


text:
"Metro" Metro Tip by Leipzig
Metro, Saint Petersburg: 84 reviews and 92 photos
I read in a book that St. Petersburg's metro is the deepest subway in the world. Now I know what this means. We entered the metro station and saw the beginning of an escalator but no end. We stepped on it and were carried down, and down and down and.... It took over one minute.
Finally at the end we saw billions of people but no metro. We were pushed to the left, then to the right, back and forth and so on. Finally we were pushed into one of the metros and couldn't budge inside. It was not easy to escape the crowds.
Admission is 7 Rubels (0.20 ?)
Mode: AROUND
Type: Subway/Metro
Website: http://petersburgcity.com/map/metro/metro.gif
More Transportation in Saint Petersburg (2)
More Reviews (44)
Leipzig's Related Pages
"Everyone talks about the weather but nobody does anything about it"
- Member Rank:
- 0 0 4 0 3
- 2,747 Reviews
- 4,704 Photos
- Add Friend
- Follow
- Send Message
Have you been to Saint Petersburg?Share Your Travels

subset: commoncrawl


text:
About |
Policies |
Contact |
Las Vegas
Call Us: 1-800-318-2220
Tampa, FL
Tallahassee, FL
Gainesville, FL
Orlando, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Philadelphia, PA
Hartford, CT
Storrs Mansfield, CT
Dallas, TX
Cincinnati, OH
Houston, TX
Memphis, TN
New Orleans, LA
Columbia, SC
Miami, FL
Tulsa, OK
Louisville, KY
Notre Dame, IN
Newark, DE
Villanova, PA
Greenville, NC
Annapolis, MD
New York, NY
Washington, DC
New Haven, CT
Birmingham, AL
College Park, MD
Indianapolis, IN
College Station, TX
Milwaukee, WI
Newark, NJ
Athens, GA
Knoxville, TN
Columbia, MO
Jacksonville, FL
Lincoln, NE
Minneapolis, MN
Tuscaloosa, AL
Norman, OK
Cambridge, MA
Lexington, KY
Nashville, TN
Baton Rouge, LA
Oxford, MS
Mississippi State, MS
Chapel Hill, NC
Chestnut Hill, MA
Atlanta, GA
Pittsburgh, PA
Syracuse, NY
Charlottesville, VA
Winston Salem, NC
Providence, RI
Omaha, NE
Rosemont, IL
Stony Brook, NY
Buffalo, NY
Muncie, IN
Ypsilanti, MI
Toledo, OH
East Lansing, MI
Towson, MD
Hollywood, FL
Basketball - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Baseball - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Football - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Jazz / Blues
NCAA Bowl Games
Temple Owls
Wake Forest Demon Deacons Football
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
Military Bowl
Temple Owls Football
South Florida Jazz
Harold Lopez Nussa
South Florida Symphony Orchestra
Untamed Spirit
Sebrina Maria Alfonso
Jeffrey Biegel
Tessa Lark
Order By Disorder
Svetlana Smolina
And the Tony Goes To
The Girl Choir of South Florida
South Florida Pride Wind Ensemble
Jon Faddis
Gold Coast Jazz
Shelly Berg Trio
Houston Person Quartet
Karrin Allyson
Diego Figueiredo
Ken Peplowski Quartet
The South Florida Jazz Orchestra
Johnny Rogers
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Huskies Women's Basketball
Ohio State Buckeyes
Ohio State Buckeyes Basketball
UConn Huskies
Nebraska Cornhuskers Basketball
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Maryland Terrapins
Maryland Terrapins Women's Basketball
East Carolina Pirates
East Carolina Pirates Basketball
South Florida Bulls Basketball
South Florida Bulls
Southern Methodist (SMU) Mustangs Women's Basketball
Southern Methodist (SMU) Mustangs
Tulsa Golden Hurricane Basketball
Tulsa Golden Hurricane
Tulane Green Wave Basketball
Tulane Green Wave
Houston Cougars
Houston Cougars Basketball
Southern Methodist (SMU) Mustangs Basketball
South Carolina Gamecocks Basketball
South Carolina Gamecocks
Temple Owls Basketball
Memphis Tigers
Memphis Tigers Basketball
South Florida Bulls Women's Basketball
Bethune-Cookman Wildcats
Bethune-Cookman Wildcats Basketball
UCF Knights
UCF Knights Basketball
Florida A&M Rattlers
Florida A&M Rattlers Women's Basketball
Cincinnati Bearcats
Texas Southern Tigers Basketball
Cincinnati Bearcats Basketball
Texas Southern Tigers
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights Basketball
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
Marshall Thundering Herd
Marshall Thundering Herd Basketball
Xavier Musketeers Basketball
Xavier Musketeers
UConn Huskies Basketball
Delaware Blue Hens Basketball
Seton Hall Pirates Basketball
Seton Hall Pirates
Delaware Blue Hens
Marist Red Foxes
Marist Red Foxes Basketball
Iona Gaels
Iona Gaels Basketball
Hofstra Pride Basketball
Hofstra Pride
Charleston Cougars
Charleston Cougars Basketball
North Carolina Wilmington Seahawks Basketball
North Carolina Wilmington Seahawks
Towson Tigers Basketball
Towson Tigers
Northeastern Huskies
Northeastern Huskies Basketball
James Madison Dukes Basketball
James Madison Dukes
Elon Phoenix
Elon Phoenix Basketball
Drexel Dragons Basketball
Drexel Dragons
William and Mary Tribe
William and Mary Tribe Basketball
William and Mary Tribe Baseball
Florida Gators
Florida Gators Baseball
Jacksonville Dolphins Baseball
Jacksonville Dolphins
Miami Hurricanes
Miami Hurricanes Baseball
UCF Knights Baseball
Columbia Lions Baseball
Columbia Lions
Florida Gulf Coast Eagles Baseball
Florida Gulf Coast Eagles
Seton Hall Pirates Baseball
Florida State Seminoles Baseball
Florida State Seminoles
LSU Tigers Baseball
LSU Tigers
Stetson Hatters
Stetson Hatters Baseball
Tennessee Volunteers
Tennessee Volunteers Baseball
North Florida Ospreys Baseball
North Florida Ospreys
South Carolina Gamecocks Baseball
Florida A&M Rattlers Baseball
Mississippi Rebels
Mississippi Rebels Baseball
South Florida Bulls Baseball
Kentucky Wildcats Baseball
Kentucky Wildcats
Virginia Commonwealth Rams Baseball
Virginia Commonwealth Rams
Samford Bulldogs Baseball
Samford Bulldogs
Oakland University Golden Grizzlies Baseball
Oakland University Golden Grizzlies
Boston College Eagles
Boston College Eagles Baseball
North Carolina Tar Heels Baseball
North Carolina Tar Heels
Clemson Tigers
Clemson Tigers Baseball
Virginia Cavaliers Baseball
Virginia Cavaliers
Pacific Tigers
Pacific Tigers Baseball
Wake Forest Demon Deacons Baseball
University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley
University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley Basketball
Liberty Flames
Liberty Flames Basketball
Harvard Crimson Basketball
Harvard Crimson
Louisville Cardinals Basketball
Louisville Cardinals
Eastern Kentucky Colonels
Eastern Kentucky Colonels Basketball
Kentucky Wildcats Basketball
Virginia Cavaliers Basketball
Indiana Hoosiers
Indiana Hoosiers Basketball
Notre Dame Fighting Irish Basketball
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Basketball
Pittsburgh Panthers
Pittsburgh Panthers Basketball
Duke Blue Devils
Duke Blue Devils Basketball
Clemson Tigers Basketball
Florida State Seminoles Basketball
North Carolina State Wolfpack Basketball
North Carolina State Wolfpack
Boston College Eagles Basketball
Miami Hurricanes Basketball
Syracuse Orange
Syracuse Orange Basketball
Virginia Tech Hokies Basketball
Virginia Tech Hokies
North Carolina Tar Heels Basketball
Wake Forest Demon Deacons Basketball
Oklahoma Sooners
Oklahoma Sooners Basketball
Incarnate Word Cardinals Basketball
Incarnate Word Cardinals
New Jersey Tech Highlanders Basketball
New Jersey Tech Highlanders
Stony Brook Seawolves
Stony Brook Seawolves Basketball
North Florida Ospreys Basketball
Minnesota Golden Gophers
Minnesota Golden Gophers Basketball
Northern Illinois Huskies
Northern Illinois Huskies Basketball
Toledo Rockets
Toledo Rockets Basketball
Buffalo Bulls
Buffalo Bulls Basketball
Eastern Michigan Eagles
Eastern Michigan Eagles Basketball
Ball State Cardinals
Ball State Cardinals Basketball
Notre Dame Fighting Irish Football
Georgia Bulldogs
Georgia Bulldogs Football
Michigan State Spartans Football
Michigan State Spartans
Miami (OH) Redhawks Football
Miami (OH) Redhawks
USC Trojans
USC Trojans Football
North Carolina State Wolfpack Football
Navy Midshipmen Football
Navy Midshipmen
Auburn Tigers
Under Armour Reunion
Auburn Tigers Basketball
Lander Bearcats Basketball
Lander Bearcats
Georgia Bulldogs Basketball
Texas A&M Aggies
Texas A&M Aggies Basketball
Tennessee Volunteers Basketball
Mississippi Rebels Basketball
Florida Gators Basketball
Missouri Tigers Basketball
Missouri Tigers
LSU Tigers Basketball
Alabama Crimson Tide Basketball
Alabama Crimson Tide
Mississippi State Bulldogs Basketball
Mississippi State Bulldogs
Arkansas Razorbacks Basketball
Arkansas Razorbacks
Vanderbilt Commodores Basketball
Vanderbilt Commodores
South Carolina Gamecocks Football
South Florida Bulls Football
Birmingham Bowl
Missouri Tigers Football
Kentucky Wildcats Football
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs Football
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs
Texas A&M Aggies Football
Arkansas Razorbacks Football
Tennessee Volunteers Football
Vanderbilt Commodores Football
Wofford Terriers Football
Wofford Terriers
Clemson Tigers Football
St. Francis (PA) Red Flash
St. Francis (PA) Red Flash Basketball
Stetson Hatters Basketball
McNeese State Cowboys
McNeese State Cowboys Basketball
Stanford Cardinal
Stanford Cardinal Basketball
Albany Great Danes
Albany Great Danes Basketball
Marquette Golden Eagles
Marquette Golden Eagles Basketball
Villanova Wildcats Basketball
Villanova Wildcats
Yale Bulldogs
Yale Bulldogs Basketball
UCF Knights Women's Basketball
Temple Owls Women's Basketball
Texas State Bobcats
Texas State Bobcats Basketball
Pennsylvania Quakers Basketball
Pennsylvania Quakers
George Washington Colonials
George Washington Colonials Basketball
Miami (OH) Redhawks Basketball
Nebraska-Omaha Mavericks
Nebraska-Omaha Mavericks Women's Basketball
UC Davis Aggies Women's Basketball
UC Davis Aggies
Memphis Tigers Women's Basketball
Tulsa Golden Hurricane Women's Basketball
Cincinnati Bearcats Women's Basketball
Houston Cougars Women's Basketball
East Carolina Pirates Women's Basketball
Georgetown Hoyas Basketball
Georgetown Hoyas
American University Eagles
American University Eagles Basketball
DePaul Blue Demons Basketball
DePaul Blue Demons
Creighton Bluejays Basketball
Creighton Bluejays
Butler Bulldogs Basketball
Butler Bulldogs
St. Johns Red Storm
St. Johns Red Storm Basketball
Providence Friars
Providence Friars Basketball
Princeton Tigers Basketball
Princeton Tigers
Roman Rabinovich
New York Standards Quartet
Nettwork Trio
Youth Pride Band of South Florida
Linda Eder
South Florida Gay Men's Chorus
Oops! We couldn't find exactly what you're looking for but we tried our best. Please try another search or look below for possible matches.
Newsletter Sign-up
Receive our latest exclusive offers and special deals
Company Information
About Us
Contact Us
Sell Tickets
Call Us: 1-800-318-2220
© Copyright Onlineseats-Ticket Broker 2016


text:
Raleigh Peak is a 6.9 mile out and back trail located near Conifer, CO and is rated as moderate. The trail is primarily used for hiking and mountain biking and is accessible from April until November.
mountain biking
Lynne R.
The best way to get to the trailhead is via hwy 285 and foxton rd just past conifer. You can use this address 2706 N Platte River Rd, Pike National Forest, Sedalia, CO 80135. But don't take I25, it doesn't drop you off close to the right parking lot. You will go over a bridge with an old south platte hotel boarded up and then you're close. The road turns to dirt. To get to Raleigh peak you have to get off trail, there's an old quarry road that was covered with old burnt trees that I think the rain moved over the road, if you don't get onto this road from the Colorado trail, you will miss the peak and end up continuing on the Colorado trail. Please try and Google other options to read others experience with this trail for more detailed instructions. Although we didn't summit, it's an awesome trail, but hot (there's not much tree shade) start early. I can't wait to go back and finish the summit


text:
As the Olympic Games get underway Trevor Barnes joins a community festival in East London organised by churches to ask what it all means to local people now it's finally arrived.
Tony Blair 'does God' in conversation with the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Daily Telegraph's Charles Moore, in the last in the series of Westminster Faith Debates.
Would you 'pray-on-the-go?' Sunday presenter Edward Stourton tests out a prototype multi-faith prayer booth designed by Manchester University.
Olympic champion, founder of the US Council for Sports Chaplaincy and contemporary gospel recording artist Madeline Manning Mimms talks faith, spirituality and sport with Edward.
Should mixed faith marriage be opposed or accommodated within the Jewish faith? Edward talks to Rabbi Jonathan Romain and Rabbi Alan Plancey following the lifting of the ban on blessing mixed faith marriages.
Matt Wells reports from New York on the world's first televangelist, Archbishop Fulton Sheen, and his journey toward sainthood.
Gay marriage got the green light in Scotland this week but where does it leave the Scottish Catholic Church whose leadership has made headlines because of its position on homosexuality? Edward discusses the issues with Professor John Haldane.


text:
AVR®: Updating PWM Duty Cycle from ADC Sensor Reading
In this video:
- Update the PWM duty cycle based upon the ADC result register.
- Open AVR_PWM.c, from a previous video.
- Copy relevant PWM_init_LED() function, relevant defines, and interrupt service routines back into this project.
- Verify that we can change the LED brightness by varying the POT connected to the ADC.
- Find the user guide and schematics for the I/O1 Xplained Pro (ATIO1-XPRO), from The Atmel Store
- Connecting the I/O1 Xplained pro to the ATmega328P Xplained mini.
- Verifying that we are now able to change the LED brightness as the light sensor reading changes.
Microchip Technology Acquires Atmel
20th Annual
Microchip MASTERs Conference 2016
JW Marriott Desert Ridge Resort-Phoenix, AZ


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Lassen)
November 28, 2012
CHARLES R. BOGGS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS,v.DELMAR HAWKINS ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
(Super. Ct. No. 46340)
Boggs v. Hawkins CA3
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
Plaintiffs Charles and Tracy Boggs purchased a 962-acre ranch (the property) from Tom Gifford, financing the lion's share of the purchase by assuming Gifford's promissory note (the Hawkins note) and deed of trust in favor of defendants Delmar and Leanna Hawkins. Gifford financed the remaining portion of the purchase by taking a second note (the Gifford note) and deed of trust. Plaintiffs later sought to obtain bank financing in order to complete construction of a house on the property. Because the bank would only agree to hold a second deed of trust, plaintiffs sought to pay off the Hawkins note. Defendants agreed to early payoff on the condition that plaintiffs pay the remaining principal on the note, plus a prepayment penalty equal to the prospective interest that would otherwise have accrued under the note. Plaintiffs paid the prepayment penalty under protest and then sued defendants, seeking return of the interest paid and reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
The trial court concluded the penalty amount demanded by defendants on that portion of the property which the court deemed to be residential exceeded the maximum allowable prepayment penalty permitted by Civil Code section 2954.9 (further unspecified section references are to the Civil Code) and entered judgment in plaintiffs' favor accordingly. The court subsequently awarded plaintiffs their costs of suit.
On appeal, plaintiffs seek reimbursement of the entire prepayment penalty paid, contending: (1) none of the documents evidencing their agreement with defendants prohibited them from prepaying the Hawkins note; (2) the controlling agreement was the agreement whereby they assumed the Hawkins note (the assumption agreement), which neither prohibited prepayment of the Hawkins note nor provided for imposition of a prepayment penalty and, as such, defendants' imposition of a prepayment penalty was a violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) section 2954.9 entitles plaintiffs to restitution of the entire prepayment penalty they paid to defendants; (4) section 2954.9 prohibited the trial court from charging the statutory maximum prepayment penalty in the absence of a written agreement to the contrary; and (5) plaintiffs are entitled to recover their attorneys fees as the prevailing parties pursuant to section 1717.
Defendants' cross-appeal, arguing plaintiffs are not entitled to reimbursement of all or any portion of the monies paid as penalty for prepayment of the Hawkins note. Defendants contend: (1) section 2954.9 does not apply here where the loan, at the time of its execution, is not secured by residential property; (2) plaintiffs failed to produce evidence to overcome the presumption that the trial court's judgment is correct; (3) defendants did not violate the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (4) the parties agreed, by novation, that the Hawkins note would not be paid off early; and (4) plaintiffs are not entitled to recover their attorneys fees.
As we will explain, plaintiffs have conceded their first two contentions are without merit by virtue of the settled statement. Plaintiffs' remaining three contentions fail because the trial court erroneously found section 2954.9 applied to the transaction at issue. In so concluding, we address each of defendants'claims. We therefore reverse the judgment granting plaintiffs partial relief.
The parties stipulated to use of a settled statement of the facts established at trial as set forth in the following portions of the trial court's statement of decision. The parties further stipulated that the following facts are "accurate and undisputed":
"Defendants entered into a Land Conservation Contract (Williamson Act) [(Gov. Code, § 51200 et seq.)] with Lassen County for Defendants' ranch parcels in Bieber, California, in February of 1991. In exchange for favorable tax treatment, the land's zoning classification changed from agricultural to a more restrictive zoning classification allowing the land only to be used for agricultural purposes from [that] time forward.
"Defendants sold 962 acres of that Bieber ranchland to Tom Gifford in August of 2002. Mr. Gifford financed the purchase partly through obtaining seller financing from Defendants. Mr. Gifford gave Defendants a Note for $650,000 [the Hawkins note] and a Deed of Trust against the ranch in order to secure payment. The [Hawkins note] provided for interest accruing at 7% per year and required annual payments of $61,355.40 due on or about October 15 of each year, with the balance to be paid on October 15, 2012.
"On or about April 8, 2006, Plaintiffs entered into a contract to purchase the 962 acre ranch from Mr. Gifford. As part of the financing of that transaction, Plaintiffs assumed [the Hawkins note] and Deed of Trust to Defendants. Defendants agreed to do so on the condition that the note not be paid off early. Plaintiffs agreed in writing to Defendants' request that the note not be paid off early. In addition, as part of the sale, Mr. Gifford agreed to also take a note [the Gifford note] and deed of trust for a portion of the purchase price. Plaintiffs agreed not to pay off [the Gifford note] early. In conjunction with the purchase of the property, Plaintiffs and Defendants executed an Addendum, April 12, 2006. The Addendum provided that [the Hawkins note] could not be paid off early, and annual payments could not be made in advance of the yearly due date, without Defendants' consent.
"Plaintiffs' purchase of the ranch from Mr. Gifford closed on May 9, 2006. Plaintiffs began building a house on the ranch in the spring of 2007. During 2007, Plaintiffs received loan approval from Tri-Counties Bank for the construction of that house, however, the Bank would only agree to hold a second deed of trust on the ranch, but not a third. Plaintiffs contacted Mr. Gifford regarding paying [the Gifford note] off early, but Mr. Gifford would not agree to an early payoff.
"Plaintiffs contacted Defendants on November 8, 2007, as their house was nearing completion, and inquired about paying off [the Hawkins note]. Defendants did not want their note paid off early, but eventually conceded that they would agree to the early pay off if all of the interest that would have accrued over the remaining term of the note were paid in full. Plaintiffs objected, and Plaintiffs['] counsel wrote a letter to Defendants informing them he believed the demand to be illegal.
"Nevertheless, when Defendants held firm, Plaintiffs authorized the payment under protest and the re-finance closed in December of 2007. Plaintiffs made payment on December 31, 2007. Within one week Defendants received payment on the remaining principal amount of [the Hawkins note], $574,608.23, as well as an amount equal to the prospective interest that would have accrued had the note run its course, $197,779.05.
"Plaintiffs filed suit in this matter on January 18, 2008, alleging four separate causes of action: usury, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, and money had and received. Plaintiffs sought compensatory damages, treble damages for violation of the usury laws, disgorgement of all interest paid, disgorgement of unjust enrichment, prejudgment interest, reasonable attorney's fees, and costs of suit. Defendants filed their answer on March 18, 2008, raising a number of affirmative defenses therein, and seeking no relief for Plaintiffs as well as attorney's fees and costs incurred in defense of suit."
"Plaintiffs have expended substantial resources to transform a portion of their property into their residence. At the time of purchase, both parties believed the property to be within the Williamson Act, and for good reason--except for two dilapidated houses deemed uninhabitable, the property was almost entirely devoid of any semblance or sign of a residence. Since purchase, Plaintiffs have rehabilitated an existing house on the property and constructed a second house which is more luxury home than farmhouse. Plaintiffs have also adapted significant portions of their property to residential use--roads, a bridge leading to a newly formed twenty acre-plus lake, water wells, lighting, fences, trees, and remarkably extensive ornamental and wildlife-attracting landscaping. It is undeniable that these portions of Plaintiffs' 962 acre property are in fact owner-occupied residential property which falls within the protections of [section] 2954.9. It is equally undeniable that portions of the property, such as the adjacent agricultural land and the remote northeastern section of land, are not owner-occupied residential property within the meaning of [section] 2954.9. The Court finds that 220 of Plaintiffs' 962 acres are owner-occupied residential property."
The trial court concluded plaintiffs failed to sustain their burden with respect to their causes of action for usury, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. As for the cause of action for money had and received, however, the court found plaintiffs demonstrated 220 acres of the 962-acre property were residential and therefore subject to the protections of section 2954.9, and that the payment demanded by defendants violated section 2954.9 by exceeding the maximum allowable prepayment penalty. The court ordered defendants to return to plaintiffs the amount of $34,824.73, with each party to bear their own fees and costs. The court later amended the amount of the award to plaintiffs to $40,027.44.
Plaintiffs filed a motion to modify the statement of decision, arguing that, pursuant to section 2954.9, defendants were not entitled to any prepayment penalty on the residential parcels in the absence of an agreement between the parties to the contrary. Plaintiffs sought restitution of the excessive sums paid to defendants on 709.10 of the 962 acres, as well as an award of costs of suit. Defendants opposed the motion on the grounds that section 2954.9 is inapplicable. The trial court denied the motion, but awarded plaintiffs their costs.
Agreement Prohibiting Prepayment
Plaintiffs contend there was no enforceable agreement prohibiting them from paying off the Hawkins note early, nor was there an agreement allowing for the imposition of a prepayment penalty in the event they did. Specifically, they contend the April 12, 2006 addendum (addendum two) was a novation subject to the statute of frauds and, because it was not signed by Leanna Hawkins, it was not a valid, binding contract as a matter of law. Plaintiffs further contend that addendum two, as well as additional escrow instructions signed by some but not all of the parties, were superseded by the May 3, 2006, assumption agreement which "specifically reaffirmed the provisions of the original Hawkins note, including its provision which allowed for early payments." As we shall explain, the parties' stipulation to the undisputed facts in the settled statement is dispositive of plaintiffs' contentions.
"In reviewing the cause we are confined to the record of the proceedings which took place in the court below and are brought up for review in a properly prepared record on appeal which, in this case, is the settled statement." (People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Keligian (1960) 182 Cal.App.2d 771, 774 (Keligian).)
A settled statement is intended to record what actually took place in proceedings for which a reporter's transcript or notes are unavailable. (People v. Anderson (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 430, 440.) "Consistent with this limited purpose, the settled statement is 'intended to ensure that the record transmitted to the reviewing court preserves and conforms to the proceedings actually undertaken in the trial court.' " (Ibid.)
When a case such as this comes to us on a settled statement, "[e]vidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law and the judgment must appear in the settled statement [citation]; we are bound to assume that enough appears in the settled statement to enable us to decide whether reversible error was committed; and we must make our ruling upon what is affirmatively shown by the record [citation]." (People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Bond (1964) 231 Cal.App.2d 435, 437 (Bond).)
Here, according to the settled statement, plaintiffs assumed the Hawkins note as part of the financing for the purchase of the ranch. Defendants agreed to that arrangement on the condition that the note not be paid off early, and "[p]laintiffs agreed in writing to [d]efendants' request that the note not be paid off early." (Underscoring omitted.) The settled statement further provides that, in conjunction with the purchase of the property, plaintiffs and defendants executed addendum two, which "provided that the [Hawkins note] could not be paid off early, and annual payments could not be made in advance of the yearly due date, without [d]efendants' consent."
The parties stipulated that the record on appeal would consist of specific portions of the trial court's statement of decision, and that those facts "are accurate and undisputed." (Italics added.) Therefore, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, it is undisputed that plaintiffs agreed, in writing, not to pay off the Hawkins note early.
As for plaintiffs' contention that addendum two is unenforceable without Leanna Hawkins' signature, we are again bound by the settled statement. Because there appears on the record no objection to the addendum on the grounds asserted here, we assume plaintiffs made none. (Waller v. Waller (1970) 3 Cal.App.3d 456, 464; Bond, supra, 231 Cal.App.2d at p. 437.) The settled statement affirms plaintiffs' agreement in writing to the prohibition of early payoff of the Hawkins note. Plaintiffs stipulated to that fact. We reject their attempt to retreat from their stipulation here on appeal.
We similarly reject plaintiffs' assertion that all parties executed an assumption agreement after addendum two and the additional escrow instructions, thus superseding any inconsistent terms contained in the earlier-signed documents, including the prohibition on early payoff of the Hawkins note. "The settled statement cannot be impeached by charges contained in a brief." (Keligian, supra, 182 Cal.App.2d at p. 774.) The settled statement is silent as to any of these matters. More to the point, the assumption agreement, although in the record on appeal, is not authenticated in the settled statement. As a consequence, these matters "may not be considered." (Ibid.)
Plaintiffs agreed in writing not to prepay the Hawkins note. They are bound by that agreement.
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
Plaintiffs contend the assumption agreement was the "only operative contract between [the parties]" and, because it did not provide for a prepayment penalty, defendants violated the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing when they imposed a penalty as a condition of early payoff of the Hawkins note.
As set forth in part I of this opinion, plaintiffs stipulated that the facts in the settled statement represented the facts established at trial, and that such facts were accurate and undisputed. The settled statement establishes that plaintiffs agreed in writing not to prepay the Hawkins note. The settled statement is silent as to the assumption agreement on which plaintiffs' contention relies, thus resolving the issue against plaintiffs. (Keligian, supra, 182 Cal.App.2d at p. 774.)
Plaintiffs contend they are entitled to restitution of the entire amount they paid in prepayment penalties pursuant to section 2954.9, subdivision (b) (hereafter section 2954.9(b)), because the entire property was secured by the deed of trust and was "owner-occupied residential real property" at all relevant times.
Defendants counter that section 2954.9 does not apply where, as here, there were no habitable houses on the property at the inception of the Hawkins note and thus there was no "residential structure" securing the loan as required by section 2954.9, subdivision (a)(1) (hereafter section 2954.9(a)(1)).
As we shall explain, the trial court erred when it decided section 2954.9 applies in this case, where the Hawkins note was neither "a loan for residential property" under subdivision (a)(1), nor a "oan secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on owner-occupied residential real property" under subdivision (b).
Section 2954.9(a)(1), provides that, "where the original principal obligation is a loan for residential property of four units or less, the borrower under any note or evidence of indebtedness secured by a deed of trust or mortgage . . . shall be entitled to prepay the whole or any part of the balance due, together with accrued interest, at any time."
Section 2954.9(b), provides that, except in circumstances not relevant here, "the principal and accrued interest on any loan secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on owner-occupied residential real property containing only four units or less may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time but only a prepayment made within five years of the date of execution of such mortgage or deed of trust may be subject to a prepayment charge and then solely as herein set forth. An amount not exceeding 20 percent of the original principal amount may be prepaid in any 12-month period without penalty. A prepayment charge may be imposed on any amount prepaid in any 12-month period in excess of 20 percent of the original principal amount of the loan which charge shall not exceed an amount equal to the payment of six months'advance interest on the amount prepaid in excess of 20 percent of the original principal amount."
In order to resolve the issues before us, we must interpret section 2954.9. We apply the independent standard of review to questions of statutory interpretation. (Burden v. Snowden (1992) 2 Cal.4th 556, 562.) In discerning the meaning of section 2954.9, we proceed according to well-established principles of statutory construction. " 'Our fundamental task in interpreting a statute is to determine the Legislature's intent so as to effectuate the law's purpose. We first examine the statutory language, giving it a plain and commonsense meaning. We do not examine that language in isolation, but in the context of the statutory framework as a whole in order to determine its scope and purpose and to harmonize the various parts of the enactment. If the language is clear, courts must generally follow its plain meaning unless a literal interpretation would result in absurd consequences the Legislature did not intend. If the statutory language permits more than one reasonable interpretation, courts may consider other aids, such as the statute's purpose, legislative history, and public policy. [Citations.]' (Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2004) 34 Cal.4th 733, 737.) 'If the meaning of the statute remains unclear after examination of both the statute's plain language and its legislative history, then we proceed cautiously to . . . apply "reason, practicality, and common sense to the language at hand." [Citation.]' (Ailanto Properties, Inc. v. City of Half Moon Bay (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 572, 583.) With the consequences that will flow from our interpretation in mind, we must give the words of the statute a workable and reasonable interpretation. [Citation.]" (Watkins v. County of Alameda (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 320, 336.)
The settled statement states that "[d]efendants sold 962 acres of . . . ranchland to Tom Gifford in August of 2002." Plaintiffs purchased the entire 962-acre ranch from Gifford in May 2006. At that time, "both parties believed the property to be within the Williamson Act, and for good reason--except for two dilapidated houses deemed uninhabitable, the property was almost entirely devoid of any semblance or sign of a residence."
Giving section 2954.9(a)(1) its plain and commonsense meaning, it is clear that the original principal obligation (i.e., the Hawkins note) was not a loan for residential property of four units or less. There were no habitable houses, nor was there any evidence of a residence, on the property when the Hawkins note was created or later, when plaintiffs purchased it from Gifford and assumed the Hawkins note.
Even assuming section 2954.9(b), not section 2954.9(a)(1), is the operative statute as plaintiffs contend, the result is the same. Giving section 2954.9(b) its plain and commonsense meaning, it is equally clear that the Hawkins note did not secure owner-occupied residential real property containing only four units or less. Again, the settled statement confirms that there was no residence on the property for plaintiffs to occupy at the time they purchased the property from Gifford.
Plaintiffs aver that, according to Garver v. Brace (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 995 (Garver), section 2954.9(b) applies to loans securing residential real property, not a dwelling or residence, and does not expressly require that the property be owner-occupied when the loan is executed. (Garver, at p. 1002.)
In Garver, the only reported California case considering the applicability of section 2954.9, the borrowers financed their purchase of a parcel of unimproved agricultural property by borrowing a significant portion of the purchase price from the sellers. The loan was evidenced by a promissory note providing for imposition of a prepayment penalty for payment made prior to the note's 10th anniversary. The purchase contract required the buyers to build a home on the property within one year of the purchase date, an obligation they fulfilled. (Garver, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at pp. 998-999.)
Four years after purchasing the property, the buyers sold it and eventually capitulated to the seller's demand to pay a prepayment fee. (Garver, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at p. 999.) Thereafter, the buyers sued for restitution, claiming the prepayment fee violated section 2954.9(b) and was unconscionable, illegal, unreasonable, unsupported by consideration, and obtained by duress. (Ibid.) The trial court ruled that section 2954.9 did not apply because the property was not "owner-occupied residential real property" when the note was executed. (Garver, at p. 1001.)
The court of appeal reversed. The court noted that nothing in the statute defined the terms "owner-occupied" or "residential," and that no reported California case had considered whether section 2954.9 applies where "the property, by prior agreement between lender and borrower, becomes owner-occupied residential real property after the loan is made and before the prepayment fee is due." (Garver, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at p. 1001; see also id. at p. 1003.) The court held the statute "applies to loans securing 'residential real property,' not a dwelling or residence," and does not "expressly require that the property be 'owner-occupied' or 'contain[] . . . four units or less' when the loan is executed." (Garver, at p. 1002.) Noting that the purchase agreement and the deed of trust required the buyers to complete construction of their residence within one year, the court found that, by the time the buyers paid the prepayment fee, they had fulfilled that obligation and thus "the property securing the note was owner-occupied real property under any definition of that term." (Id. at p. 1002.) The court noted the uniqueness of the circumstances, and concluded that "where, by prior agreement between lender and borrower, the property securing the loan becomes an owner-occupied residence after the loan has been executed and before the prepayment fee is paid," section 2954.9 applies. (Ibid., italics added.)
Without disagreeing with Garver, we conclude that its holding is reliant on several unique circumstances not present in this case. For instance, here, unlike Garver, there was no prior agreement between plaintiffs and defendants obligating plaintiffs to construct and occupy a residence on the property within a time certain of assuming the Hawkins note, or at all. In fact, the purchase agreement between plaintiffs and Gifford (a document which by implication was authenticated by the settled statement) indicates the contrary, that "Buyer does not intend to occupy the Property as Buyer's primary residence."
Plaintiffs contend defendants knew of their intention to make the ranch their primary residence by virtue of addendum three, executed on April 27, 2006, which includes language that "Buyer intends to create a parcel for the construction of a primary dwelling," and that Gifford and defendants would "release said parcel for payment." Plaintiffs argue addendum three constituted an agreement made at the time of purchase obligating them to construct their primary residence on the ranch. We disagree.
Addendum three is not mentioned in the settled statement, and thus we are at a loss as to what part, if any, that document may have played in the trial court's decision-making process. Even assuming consideration of addendum three were proper, its language merely reflects plaintiffs' intent to create a parcel upon which to construct their primary residence; it does not evidence an agreement between the parties obligating plaintiffs to construct their residence within a specified amount of time, or at all. We are left to rely on the purchase agreement indicating plaintiffs' intent not to occupy the ranch property as their residence.
Next, the residence in Garver was completed within one year of execution of the note and prior to the request for prepayment. (Garver, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at p. 999.) The Garver court noted that, "[u]nder the unique facts alleged in the complaint, section 2954.9 applies to this note because, by prior agreement, the property securing the note became an owner-occupied residence shortly after the note was executed." (Id. at p. 998, italics added.) Here, in contrast, plaintiffs did not begin construction of what was to become their residence until nearly a year after they assumed the Hawkins note. According to the settled statement, plaintiffs requested the early payoff "as their house was nearing completion." Although plaintiffs assert that "they were residing at the ranch" when they sought to prepay the Hawkins note, the settled statement states simply that, "[s]ince purchase," plaintiffs "rehabilitated an existing house on the property and constructed a second house," saying nothing about where plaintiffs resided. Thus, there is no evidence before us that construction on plaintiffs' primary residence on the property was complete, or that plaintiffs occupied that residence, at the time they requested early payoff of the Hawkins note in November or December of 2007. The "unique circumstance" in Garver is not present here. (Garver, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at p. 1002.)
We also note that, here, the trial court determined portions of the ranch property were adapted to "residential use," a term neither found in section 2954.9 nor implied by its language. Instead, section 2954.9 requires that the loan be secured by "owner-occupied residential real property," a phrase which, as plaintiffs correctly point out, is not explicitly defined in the statute. In our opinion that phrase, given its plain and commonsense meaning, clearly requires that the real property be residential (as opposed to commercial or agricultural, for instance) and that the owner of the property occupy it as his or her residence. Neither was true here. " 'When statutory language is . . . clear and unambiguous there is no need for construction, and courts should not indulge in it.' [Citation.]" (People v. Cole (1982) 31 Cal.3d 568, 572.)
Nonetheless, plaintiffs urge that the Legislature's 1979 amendment to section 2954.9(a)(1) eliminating the $100,000 cap on loans that can be prepaid without penalty shows that section 2954.9 was enacted to save homeowners from the "untenable position of being forced to pay large prepayment penalties, whenever they wished or needed to re-finance or sell their homes," and that the statute was never intended "to punish farmers, ranchers and/or other owner-occupants with exorbitant prepayment penalties simply because their homes sit on land which is not used exclusively for 'residential purposes.' "
Plaintiffs ignore a key portion of the legislative history which states that the 1979 changes to section 2954.9 were intended to "extend the limitation on prepayment penalties from (present law) single-family, owner-occupied dwellings to (the bill) four or fewer residential units, owner-occupied." (Italics added.) That language reveals the Legislature's intent that the statute apply to residential property encumbered with owner-occupied "dwellings" or "units," as opposed to agricultural property, a portion of which is later utilized for a residence or which is put to "residential use" by improvements such as roads, bridges, fences, trees, landscaping, and the like.
We conclude that where, at the time the loan is assumed, the property does not contain an owner-occupied primary residence and it is not contemplated that it will contain such a residence in the immediate future, section 2954.9(b) does not apply.
Statutory Maximum Prepayment Penalty
Plaintiffs contend that where, as here, none of the agreements between the parties provided for the imposition of a prepayment penalty, section 2954.9(b) prohibited the trial court from charging the statutory maximum prepayment penalty. As explained at length in parts III and IV of this opinion, section 2954.9 does not apply under these facts. We reject plaintiffs' contention on that basis.
Attorneys Fees
Plaintiffs contend they are entitled to an award of attorneys fees pursuant to section 1717 based on the "one-sided attorneys fees provision" in the Hawkins deed of trust, and because they were the prevailing parties below. We disagree. Whether or not section 1717 is applicable, we conclude plaintiffs were not the prevailing parties on any of their claims. Hence, they are not entitled to attorneys fees.
We find no merit in any of plaintiffs' contentions on appeal. On defendants' cross-appeal, we reverse the award of damages in the amount of $40,027.44 to plaintiffs, as well as the award to plaintiffs of their costs of suit. We affirm the judgment in all
other respects. Defendants are awarded their costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1), (2).)
We concur:
BLEASE , Acting P.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
- labels: --> Interface (example)
- milestone: --> v1.0 (example)
- priority: 5 --> 7
- assigned_to: nobody --> monyschu
Use the viewport meta tag to set user-scalable and use specific scale options:
<meta name="viewport" content="user-scalable=false; initial-scale=1.0;maximum-scale:1.0;minimum-scale:1.0" />
For more accurate repro, have 6-12 divs of content that have "float:left;" as part of the style such that they would float around each other given more space (test in Safari for that)
When switching from portrait to landscape, iPhoney zooms in by scaling up instead of respecting the maximum-scale attribute
No scaling such that more divs appear on the screen on a specific horizontal line.
http://www.chunklove.com - look at on iPhone and the iPhoney 1.1.
Logged In: NO
I agree, not supporting the iphone viewport is a major mis-step by iPhoney. I love iPhoney, but find it essentially useless for previewing iPhone websites because, if they are properly handling rotation, then they are using viewports which iPhoney is ignoring. For another example, check out http://www.launchrz.com
Log in to post a comment.


text:
July 3, 2014
Escape the Independent House is the escape game developed by Wow Escape. Assume you are a nurse who had to be home for days because a curious illness was spreading in the hospital and all of the workers were sent home until the place was totally healthy again. One day after you woke up your phone rang. It was a doctor informing you the building had been disinfected and all of the workers could return to the work today. You got in your cape and wanted to leave, but found the entrance locked. Probably your husband locked it and took the keys with himself. Find hidden objects and solve puzzles to get out somehow. Good luck and have fun!


text:
Cottage in West Quantoxhead, Nr. Watchet, Somerset - Peaceful National Park Location
Self catering traditional comfortable cottage, available all year including long breaks. Set on the edge of a National Park, splendid views. A quaint village with a local pub (recommended for eating out), also a local shop. Pets are welcome but a small fee charged.Self catering traditional comfortable cottage, available all year including long breaks. Set on the edge of a National Park, splendid views. A quaint village with a local pub (recommended for eating out), also a local shop. Pets are welcome but a small fee charged.
Top Traveller Review
Relaxing atmosphere in a beautiful spot
About the Owner
I actually live in Switzerland with my Family and we love to come and stay at My Cottage (Family Home) every year. My Daughter loves to go riding on The Quantocks.
l enjoy taking the Bookings (to have that friendly contact with people that will be staying in my Cottage). I have a local family who take care of Moonfleat and my Guests. Am very fortunate to have a friendly family who keep their Horse in My back Paddock . Moonfleat holds a lot of sentimental value, as it was my late Mother's home from when we moved there in the early 80s.
Guestbook comments from the owner
From Moria and John from London : beautiful Cottage, great spot striding out from the front door. Dunster, Crowcombe, Smiths combe tea room/garden EastQuontoxhead-marvelous.
Jonathan and Janis Lord West Yorks: Sorry we are leaving today, everything just wonderful! This Cottage is actually Home to Home and so warm!
1 Reviews
1 holidaymaker review
Relaxing atmosphere in a beautiful spot
I've stayed a few times at Moonfleat. It is a home from home, welcoming and comfortable, and has everything you need for your stay. It's Penny's family home and this reflects in every bit of the cottage, it's loved and looked after perfectly. The top garden has views across the Somerset coastline, the Welsh coast can be seen in the day and at night with the twinkling lights, Cardiff Airport is really clear at night. The garden's enclosed and dog friendly. The little orchard is lovely and my little dog loves running through it. The area is full of places to visit, Dunster is gorgeous (although I am bias as my family come from there). There are no end of pubs serving good food. For a drive out, The Rest and Be Thankful out at Wheddon Cross, serves excellent food and the staff are friendly. Sunday dinners are good at the Badgers Holt in Bridgetown (on the way to Dulverton). I really can't fault Moonfleat apart from the fact that I never want to leave
From the Owner
"It was always my family Dream to move to the West Country. Being a horsey family and having 2 Boarder Collies, Moonfleat seemed to fit the picture. Well am glad l did. l have some wonderfull memories to fall back on. As the years have gone by many improvements have been made to the Cottage itself without spoiling its charm."
Activity and Interests
Local Coastal Walks, 10 minute drive. 15 mins to Watchet (a local Port) 25 minutes to Dunster Beach, 20 minutes to Blue Anchor Bay. Minehead 30 mins.
Bristol Airport 1 hour. Plymouth Channel Port 1 and a half. Poole 2 hours
Williton local small Town 3 miles. Watchet 3 miles. Minehead and edge of Exmoor 15 miles. Bridgewater and Taunton 20 miles. Wells 40 miles
Further Details:
Supermarkets and shops at Minehead, Taunton and Bridgewater. Local Town Williton has a local product shops as well as takeaways, pubs. Village of Westquontoxhead has a local pub, garage with shop.
Village of Westquontoxhead has a Tea Room, Pub and a small shop with Garage. You can purchase Logs there
Rental rates
|Rental Period
|Minimum Price
|Additional Nights
|Weekend Night
|Event Price
Febuary to March
1 Feb 2017 - 31 Mar 2017
2 night minimum stay
for 2 nights
Additional pricing information
|Pet Fee
Booking Notes:
20% deposit paid on booking. The rest should be cleared in account 4 weeks before arrival. Last minute full payment. All payments paid directly to account.
Changeover Day:
Flexible but High Season Friday or Saturdays. Guests are kindly requested to arrive anytime after 3.30pm. Departure up to 10.am.
Notes on prices:
These prices do not including Bed Linen and Towels. A Fee of £35.00 is charged if you require Towels and Bed Linen.
Well behaved Dogs are welcome. A Fee of £10 is charged
Use of Washing Machine and Tumbler is not included in the Price.
Prices are up to 4 people. Extra Sofa Bed there is a fee of £30.00 per stay
lnternet is included in the price
Not included is use of washing machine
Owner's Cancellation Policy
- 100% refund for cancellations more than 60 days before check-in date.
- 12
- Available arrival
- 12
- Available
- 12
- Unavailable
From the Owner
"The most enjoyable thing that comes to my mind is the Breathtaking views from Moonfleat and the joy of the Sunset which have been able to catch some evenings. When l close my eyes the twittering of all the different species of birds."
Property Type
- cottage
- Away From It All
- Garage ...
- Hair Dryer
- Heating
- Internet
- Iron & Board
- Living Room ...
- Parking ...
- Tumble Dryer ...
- Washing Machine ...
- Dishwasher
- Freezer
- Kitchen ...
- Microwave
- Oven
- Refrigerator
- Dining Area
- Books ...
- DVD Player
- Games ...
- Television
- children welcome
- non smoking only
- pets considered
- wheelchair inaccessible
Location Type
- near the sea
- rural
- village
- churches
- forests
- zoo
Leisure Activities
- bird watching
- horse riding
- scenic drives
- sight seeing
- walking
Local Services & Businesses
- groceries
Sports & Adventure Activities
- cycling
- fishing
- hiking
- mountain biking
- pier fishing
- bay fishing
- Shower room 1 - Shower Enclosure
- Bathroom with electric shower , toilet, sink.
- 2 Bedrooms, Sleeps 6
- Bedroom 1
- Bedroom 2
- Description of sleeping capacity: Sleeps max 6. 2 upstair bedrooms. Dining room can Notes on bedrooms: Bedroom 1 with twin beds bedroom 2 with Kingsize double bed Dining room. Twin beds
- Golf ...
- Garden
- Self-catering
Learn more about this holiday rental at the owner's website
- Notes on accommodation: Children from 6 yrs are welcome. Not suitable for small children due to the steep stairs. Outside: Cottage is on Large Natural Grounds with an Orchard. Up a few steps and you are at a breath taking point. A Patio with chairs and a table. Utility Room: Sink, shelves, place for rods, boots, umbrella.washing machine and tumbler Cleaning / Towels / Linen / Maid service: optional if you should like to bring your own bed Linen and towels. (to which there would be a reduction of 30 pounds) If guests stay for more than a week there is a chamber maid service to which cottage is cleaned and bed linen changed. Other: Comfortable Sitting room, open wood burner. Comfortable sofa. TV.


text:
The undeniably quirky Mr Fogg's in Mayfair links up with Bulleit Bourbon and Bulleit Rye on Wednesday 26th to deliver an event fit for any Southern belle and beau. A Louisville - inspired band get things underway by playing a handful of tunes to welcome guests through the door, before returning at regular intervals throughout the evening with a number of sporadic encores!
A whole host of Americana treats will be on offer here - think delicious meat loaf canapés, mini burgers and two especially created Bulleit tipples - and they'll be served by members of staff kitted out in sumptuous Southern colonel uniforms just for that added dose of authenticity.
With rumours circulating that Mr Fogg could be in line to make a long-awaited appearance himself, this fun-loving celebration is definitely not one to be missed without a good excuse!
Best New Bar 2014 - DesignMyNight Awards This Mayfair house imagines the Victorian abode of Phileas J. Fogg Esq,...More about Mr Fogg's London
No reviews. Be the first!
Discover the different ways you can work with us, whether you own a bar, restaurant, pub, club, private hire space, pop-up and/or run events.
Revolutionary booking and enquiry management software for bars, restaurants, pubs and clubs. Table management, pre-orders, payments and more.
An online ticketing box office, catering for all kinds of events, pop ups to big music festivals, and free marketing and exposure to help sell more tickets.
Need to get your venue out to millions? Use our targeted marketing packages to instantly push your venue to a young professional audience.


text: hi i have tryed putting my ipod into the mode were you hold the home and power button and then home button and that works fine and when i go to restore my ipod it says make shure you have the latest itunes when i have got 8.1? anyone help? thanks mitch


text:
Starring Liam Hemsworth, Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman
Directed by Roland Emmerich
Music Composed by Harald Kloser, Thomas Wander
Additional Music Composed by Marcus Trumpp
Two decades after the freak alien invasion that nearly destroyed mankind a new threat emerges. This Alien mothership is more than twice the size as the last one and once again, the world's armies must band together to save the world. Do they have enough firepower or will this battle change and will aliens take over?


text:
Faculty members from Pomona College, Scripps College and Cal Arts formed a quartet and performed classical string music to a diverse audience of children and adults on April 6 in Balch Auditorium at Scripps College.
Tag Archives | concert
Music flows through Bridges Hall
Three Pomona College faculty members performed songs inspired by water in a concert titled "Notes on Water" March 31 at the Mabel Shaw Bridges Hall of Music.
Cross-cultural music honors past
Tales of perseverance and celebration about the Sephardic Jewish culture were painted through music by the Los Angeles Jewish Symphony March 29 in Morgan Auditorium.
Bonita bands swing big for fundraiser
Bonita High School held "Swingin' with the Big Bands," its 15th annual fundraiser night, for their band and color guard programs at the Fox Theater in Pomona on March 2.
Concert is a mix of jazz and politics
Jazz musician and writer Gilad Atzmon played an energetic and exciting concert in Tuesday night's performance in Morgan Auditorium.
Music builds a bridge from Africa to Appalachia
Joti Rockwell tunes his mandolin before Trans-Atlantic Steel: Appalachian Strings and Zimbabwean Keys, a faculty recital in Pomona College's Lyman Hall on Saturday.
Choral consortium flows together
Swelling and surging voices wafted through Bridges Auditorium Saturday for a Choral Celebration with the Millennium Consort Singers and Pomona College Choir. A full house came to hear a range of pieces from Tom Flaherty's "Water Ruminations" to the work of Johann Sebastian Bach and Percy Grainger. The theme of the night centered on the […]
Organ trio merges personal styles
The University of La Verne community and an array of guests filled the Morgan Auditorium on Dec. 2 to listen to the melody and beats of the Gayle Serdan Organ Trio.
Colleges unite in orchestra
Conductor Eric Lindholm and his Pomona College Orchestra finish up Beethoven's Symphony No. 8 in F Sunday afternoon in Bridges Hall of Music at Pomona College in Claremont.
Concert series expresses nostalgia
The Friday Noon Concert greeted eager listeners like an early evening breeze after a warm day with Rachel V. Huang, adjunct professor of music at Scripps, on violin and Paul R. Bishop, Scripps performance staff, on piano.


text:
Official visits from Vietnam discouraged
SANTA ANA With ceremony and a promise of solidarity with the Vietnamese American community, the City Council adopted a resolution seeking to discourage official visits from communist Vietnam.
"What this resolution is intended to do is to send a message to those who are adverse to freedom," said Councilman Vincent F. Sarmiento, noting, as the resolution does, that Little Saigon has its roots in Santa Ana. "We want to stand against countries that violate human rights of their citizens."
Mayor Miguel Pulido invited council members, following a 6-0 vote on Tuesday, to gather in front of their chamber to sign the resolution, which went into effect with their signatures.
As they did so, representatives of the Vietnamese community, ranging from youth to the elderly, gathered to witness the event.
"This resolution really shows that Santa Ana stands behind promoting social justice," Councilwoman Angelica Amezcua said.
Under terms of the measure, the city is on record in discouraging official government visits from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to Santa Ana.
Vietnamese officials will be required to alert the chief of police at least 14 days before a visit. The city asserted its right to charge any entity that initiates official visits for any costs that Santa Ana might incur.
Most Popular
- Caught on video: Trump's election was an 'act of terrorism,' says Orange Coast College in
- Two-car crash leaves man critically injured, mother and child hurt in Irvine
- Peek inside the landmark PCH water tower house, opening for tours Saturday
- Woman shears hydrant, slams into building while swerving to avoid a person in the road
- Man on Santa Ana Most Wanted List arrested in connection with homicide
User Agreement
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our Privacy Policy Policy & Terms of Use
Keep it civil and stay on topic. No profanity, vulgarity, racial slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. By posting your comment, you agree to allow Orange County Register Communications, Inc. the right to republish your name and comment in additional Register publications without any notification or payment.


text:
Top Rated Casino Sites Reviews and Recommendations
Top Rated Casino Sites provides prospective players with one of the best sources for generous welcome offers, incredible games, and detailed reviews on online casino brands. Find just what you are looking for with these useful resources.
Our detailed reviews and analysis outline the best online casinos that fit our strict criteria of generous welcome bonuses, a large selection of quality games, service, support, security and more. We compare them all in an easy to read table so you don't have to go far to find all the information you need to make an informed decision.
When you're looking for a top level online casino, you want to find one that offers a substantial welcome bonus. We've tracked down the biggest and the best, assembling a selection of the top offers all in one place.
Make your choice and redeem a substantial welcome offer today!
*T&C's apply to each of the offers below, click "Claim Now" for more details …
Casino Las Vegas is all about bringing you the authentic Vegas experience to your phone,computer, wherever you are in the world.
Read More
Royal Panda is one of the fastest growing online casinos out there, and definitely a superb choice for UK players.
Read More
Titan Casino is one of the finest quality casino with a huge selection of slots, tables and card games. Titan's games lobby is impressive. Titan Casino has Live Dealer games, Sports and Poker.
Read More
Foxy Casino graphics are top notch - it's like going to Vegas whilst sitting on your sofa! The layout is easy to use, so you can find all your favourites in no time at all.
Read More
A company with over 200 years of experience in providing top-notch betting and gaming services, offers great bonuses for those who are loyal to the system and back for more.
Read More
A fun and friendly brand with a distinctly Irish flavour, Pots of Luck is quickly establishing itself as a go-to destination for online gaming.
Read More
Partycasino is one of the world's largest online casinos. Partycasino is an excellent place to enjoy safe with more than 200 games on offer.
Read More
We assume Kerching! name from the sound of coins hitting the payout tray when you play real-world slots. This casino has successfully replicate that enticing noise, Will you be hearing 'Kerching' when you play here?
Read More
Generous welcome bonuses, exciting online casino games and big chance to win huge jackpots should give you all the reason you need to sign up and have excitement at the Betfair Casino!
Read More
Sapphire Rooms, online gaming portal that combines great games with cool offers. If you're searching for a 5-star online gaming experience, prepare to be dazzled!
Read More
What makes our online Casino rates so good?
At the Top Rated Casino Sites, we take a detailed approach to rate online Casino sites.
The score for each Casino site is based on a number of factors – the software, design, bonuses, promotions, variety of markets, ease of deposit and withdrawals and the average user review.
But that's not all! We also have user testimonials. This lets you read a bit about each Casino site from two different vantage points – our editorial review and regular online punter like you.
How do we rate Casino welcome bonuses?
At the Top Rated Casino Sites, we take a very close look at welcome offers & promotions.
By reading many of the reviews, articles and other information on our site you will gain knowledge that will assist you in finding the online casino that is best fitting to you.
Our reviewers are just like you – we want a middle of the road welcome bonus that we can afford. That's the kind of bonus you'll find at the Top Rated Casino Sites.
Why use our Service?
We have spent countless hours creating this unique and detailed resource that provides unbiased and in-depth analysis of online casino brands which go above and beyond in their level of services and support for players.
We've compiled our findings in an easy to read interface for your convenience and offer an exclusive array of welcome offers that can only be redeemed through our site. Take the time to choose a brand that offers what you are looking for and redeem your bonus offer today.


text:
Game Centered: Mobile Games Trends, a Surprising App Store Hit, and an Engrossing Maze Game
By Siva Om
Game Centered features roundups and reviews of the best in iOS games and gaming related news. Among the App Store's myriad games, it's all too easy to overlook some of the great new releases. Each installment of Game Centered will take a closer look at a select few iOS games that are worthy of special recognition. This week we'll take a look at one of the most popular mobile games on video game streaming platforms, as well as an unlikely entry into the App Store's top 10, and a new game that brings a refreshing twist to an old classic puzzle genre.


text:
This website uses cookies. Read our cookie policy for more information. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
This website uses cookies. Read our cookie policy for more information. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Login / register
Lost password?
5 second CV upload - don't believe us? Try it yourself
Contact Us
London: +44 (0) 203 301 9900
Hamburg: +49 (0)40 822 169 169
Like us? Show some love
Home > Snr Digital Designer (eCommerce / App / Mobile), London, UK
Snr Digital Designer (eCommerce / App / Mobile) required by my eCommerce client to work in their amazing offices in London on a 3 month initial contract.
This is a big project that is due to extend and is paying £425/day
This brand has gone from strength to strength. Winning multiple awards recently and doubling in size and taking over their market
Working alongside the UX and development teams you will look to completely overhaul their mobile applications giving them a sleek design and customer journey
This is an opportunity to join one of the most successful online retailers in the UK and design products that are seen by its enormous customer base
The ideal person for this role will have:• Experience designing for eCommerce mobile applications• Have a portfolio of clean public facing interfaces across multiple projects• eCommerce/retail experience is ideal• Good communication skills
If this is of interest please get in touch!
You may return to your current search results by clicking here.
If you would like to receive jobs by email, then it's easy! To get started just fill in your details below and select which categories you would like to receive jobs from. Then Xcede will send you jobs every day tailored to your requirements. So what are you waiting for?
5 second CV upload - don't believe us?
© Providing a recruitment capability to clients that are utilising ROI based marketing and sales techniques to maximise customer experience and spend across traditional and digital channels.
Recruitment website by Strategies


text:
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Hello as you can see I love nala she is my fav charecter
I think nala is awsome little lion cub she is so curiousRead more >


text:
Okay folks; Just learning the "front end" portion of this thing called "Solo Chair". But I think I've gotten
our first two events of the season, Brooksville, Fl Jan 10, 2016, and Deland, Fl Jan 17, 2016, up and available
for registration on
IMPORTANT for BROOKSVILLE: Note that due to some requirements imposed on us by the sight, Brooksville
REQUIRES pre-registration, and that pre-registration must occur 10 days prior to the event, which in
this case is Dec 31, 2015; New Year's Eve. So, register now while the registration is HOT!
Also, stay tuned to this space and our Facebook page www.facebook.com/cfrsolo2, for important announcements on our
2016 plans. This will include year end trophy rules, supplemental competition rules, and general plans to
make our program an even better and more enjoyable program all of you, our CFR SCCA Solo competitors.
It's gonna be a great, great, year!!!
If you have participated in at least one CFR SCCA Solo event this year - Year End Trophy winner or not - we will be giving out a "completed" punch card (i.e., a free Solo event entry in 2017) to each and every Solo driver that attends the 2016 Annual Banquet.
Additionally, if you are a year end Class Champion, you are also eligible to receive a $20 discount on your entry fee for the Annual Banquet.
Angela Carlascio will be your presenter during the Solo Awards portion of the banquet. We will be giving out 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place year end trophies for all drivers who qualified (i.e., had 9 or more points events in the class - see Year End Points). We will also be giving Trevor Renson a special trophy for winning the Top 10 PAX Deland Shootout Championship. (We are still determining what we are going to call that trophy, so message us your ideas). Also, we will be announcing who has earned the distinction of the 2016 Solo Worker Of The Year, at the Worker Luncheon and at the Awards Banquet.
Everybody that attends also gets door prizes, of varying value. In the past, the door prizes will be anything from Sebring Shirts, IMSA Hats, Racing Shoes, Window Nets, Bottles of Champagne, up to really nice prizes like GoPro Cameras. There is also usually a silent auction for some neat items with the benefits going to a chosen charity. For more details, download the flyer HERE
So come out to the Awards Banquet and share an evening with lots of folks that share our love of motorsports, receive your trophies, and/or cheer on your friends as they receive their trophies.
Well folks; the Sebring "Double Points / Double Participation" event is in the books, and it was a great one. Thanks to a portion of each entry, separate donations, and a CFR SCCA Solo match of the separate donations, our total donation to the
GoFundMe for the family of Tony "Rosco" Rietdorf will be $500. A very worthy cause for the memory of a member of our SCCA Solo community.
The points have been tallied and all of the results are up. Note that to achieve the "Double Points / Double Entry" for the Sebring, in the year end points and year end PAX results, you will see that Sebring 10/16/16 event has been included twice as Event #17 and Event #18.
Registration for the Deland Event #19 for November 20, 2016 has been opened on DlbRacing.com. This is the last event of the season for the Central Florida Region SCCA Solo Points Championship.
And a couple of announcements regarding the Year End Championships:
Even though our last event will be Deland, Event #19, we in fact have only had 17 events as Event #4 and Event #11 were cancelled and show as no results. At 17 events, we will be requiring 9 events to qualify for a year end trophy, and anything over that and your worst events will be thrown out to give you a total of 9 counting events.
So if you have participated in only 8 events in a class so far this year, Deland Event #19 is your last opportunity to qualify for a year end trophy.
Also, note that we will be giving trophies to the top three (and only three) qualifying drivers in each class.
And lastly, since at this point nobody will be able to achieve the required 9 events to qualify for year end trophies in the "X" class, we will instead be handing out trophies for the top three qualifiers in the PAX Championship.
Stay tuned for more information regarding the Annual Banquet!
It turns out that there has been a mix-up with Sebring regarding our usage of the sight on Saturday 10/15. And as a consequence, we will not be able to have the Saturday portion of our event.
The Sunday 10/16 points event is still on as planned, and it will still be a charity event for the benefit of the family of Tony "Rosco" Rietdorf (see my earlier post). This event will now be a "Double Points" event, and will count as two events participation.
The primary reason for changing the now cancelled Saturday event from a practice event to a points event was to enable more folks to qualify for year end trophies, particularly due to the loss of the 10/30 Brooksville event. With the Saturday event cancelled, awarding double points and double participation will allow more people to qualify for end of year trophies.
For those that have prepaid for the Saturday event, refunds will be initiated for the fee for the Saturday event as soon as this post is posted. Of course, for anybody that has prepaid and cannot or does not attend the Sunday event, a full refund will be initiated. As usual, we ask that if you are not going to attend, please cancel your registration on DlbRacing.
One other thought: Also effected by the mix-up is the Saturday night social, which will not be held in the paddock area, but will be held at the Bill Martin building (the SCCA building at Gate 3 of Sebring).
Sorry for any inconvenience that this late adjustment may have caused.
See you this Sunday in Sebring!
SEBRING! Major Announcements!
As we have cancelled the Brooksville 10/30/16 points event due to a schedule conflict with the airport, we have decided that the October Sebring event will be a Points Saturday(Cancelled!), Double Points Sunday, still a double points weekend. That is, two separate "points" events in one day.
Remember, the SCCA Social (in the 12 hour paddock "Hall of Champions") is effected by the above change, see announcement above. There will be free food, free "soft" beverages, and free "adult" beverages (for adults only!).
Additionally, the Humane Society of Highlands County, Sebring, will be presenting its annual TERROR TRAIL, PHOBIA! on Friday and Saturday evening right across the street from Sebring International Raceway. Park at Gate 3 Sebring Raceway. Entry is only $15. This event is not intended for small children! Call 863-214-6508 for info.
Finally, we have decided to make the two day, now one day, Sebring event a charity event, with the designated charity being for the benefit of the family (wife and 6 month old baby son) of Tony "Rosco" Rietdorf, who as you may have heard passed away on September 11th, 2016 from non-competition injuries he sustained while at the 2016 SCCA Solo Nationals Championship at Lincoln, Nebraska.
As a start, we will be donating $6 from each participant entry fee (i.e., $12 for a two day entry). We will also provide an additional $4 times the number of entry fees as matching funds, for the matching of all funds donated at the event. That is we will be donating $6 minimum per entry, up to a total of $10 times the number of entries, matching all additional donations.
If we have time for fun runs after the competition days, we will also collect $2 per fun run which will also be included in our donation to the Rosco family.
For those who are not familiar with Tony "Rosco" Rietdorf,
Here is a link to the GoFundMe Account for his wife and son.
And here is a link to the Official SCCA Statement
Any checks for donations to the wife and son of Tony Rietdorf to be donated at the event should be made out to "CFR SCCA" as the total donation will be made through the club. If you wish to donate directly to the family, we encourage you to use the GoFundMe link given above for that purpose. We will only be able to provide match funds, however, for funds that are donated through CFR SCCA at the October Sebring event.
As you may have already deduced, we have moved the Deland event from August 21st to July 24th, mainly so we would not have Deland and OCCC on back-to-back weekends in August; but also so we could have an event in an otherwise empty July. And as previously noted, registration is now open for that event.
We have also added an event at Brooksville on Sunday August 7th in Brooksville and registration is open for that event as well. Note that Brooksville has its usual early registration requirements... If you have not been there, or you have a guest that has not been there with CFR SCCA in the past year, you need to register yourself and any guests by Thursday, July 28th so that we can have your name on the advance "list" that we are required to turn in to Brooksville. If you and your guest(s) have been (and your names are on the list), registration will be open till Thursday, August 4th.
Also, registration for our August 27th, 28th event at Orange County Convention Center is open.
Furthermore, stay tuned, as we have some more announcements coming, including one more event in August...
Online registration is required for all CFR SCCA Solo events. Prepayment is also recommended as it makes your morning check-in go much quicker, and generally makes for a smoother running event.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Out of consideration for every competitor that makes it to the event, if you are preregistered and find you are not going to make the event, PLEASE cancel your registration via DlbRacing.com prior to closure of online registration (usually the Thursday before the event). This is whether you have prepaid or not. If you simply do not show up on the morning of the event, we can not use the event pre-planning (# of heats, run/work order, and work assignments) that we have already setup prior to the event. And that means we have to re-do this planning and that cannot commence until AFTER on-site registration/check-in is closed. This time consuming task then delays when we can do the Drivers Meeting, which delays the first car out, and ultimately means less runs for each and every driver.
We have opened a "Test-N-Tune" event on www.dlbracing.com for Saturday, August 6th, at Brooksville. You must preregister and prepay for this, as the attendance will be strictly limited to 30 people to insure everyone gets plenty of "Test-N-Tune" time. We will be using sector timing, and the course will be designed specifically for "Test-N-Tune" purposes.
Being Brooksville, it has the usual Brooksville requirement for advance registration imposed on us by the Brooksville officials.
Also, as for registration, this is being handled as a separate event than the August 7th, Brooksville points event.
So officially, the 6/25/2016 Valkaria event is without a home and will be cancelled.
They do not believe this will effect our future plans with them, though, so we are looking for dates that work well for both our calendars.
We are also looking into some other events in the late June and July time frame. Meanwhile, we have our upcoming 6/5/16 event at Brooksville. Right now, we are past the date for "SCCA Newcomers" to the Brooksville site, but if you have participated in an SCCA Brooksville event in the past year, you are still welcome to register. By the way, the Brooksville event is at an awesome site; very long, and very grippy concrete. So we enthusiastically encourage you to come on out!
Furthermore, stay tuned regarding future Valkaria events, as well as some potential other events in June and July.
This site will allow unprecedented course design options for us, including the potential for Nationals Style elements that no other CFR site allows for, as well as run times greater than a minute. Far greater if desired. The site is big enough that it could potentially be used for National Tours, and - dare I say it - SCCA Pro Solos! We are going to get in there and try it as a local event first, though, before we make any decisions regarding anything "bigger".
The site is big enough, that we can hold - in effect - two events at the same time, which we are going to take advantage of by offering both a Starting Line School as well as a CFR SCCA practice event on Saturday, May 7th. The Starting Line School is an amazing opportunity to get autocross instruction from some of the best autocross instructors in the country. Several items are included in the Starting Line Package on top of the day long expert instruction, making a great motorsport value.
Go to http://www.scca.com/pages/starting-line for the complete run down, and go
to http://www.scca.com/events/1984366-starting-line-daytona for the registration link for this particular event at Daytona.
IMPORTANT NOTE: If you register for the SCCA Starting Line School by 4/20/16, in addition to the full day of expert instruction and otherwise valuable Starting Line School package, you will get a bonus of an event entry to an SCCA Track Night In America, which alone is worth $150.
This site is accessed differently than the DIS Go Kart track. For the CFR SCCA Practice and Points events, as well as the Starting Line School, you will basically be driving behind the DIS stadium between the stadium and the airport, and access the site via DIS Gate 70 off of "Midway Avenue". Midway Avenue runs between Williamson Blvd, and International Speedway Blvd. At Gate 70, you will sign the waiver and get a wrist band to give you access to the autocross site, as well as the main stadium via DIS Gate 40. There you can watch the Club Racers, or access the Fan Zone. If desired, you will be allowed to camp in the infield for free, or for $20 if you want electric hook-ups. You will not be allowed to camp on the pad where we will be autocrossing, but you will be able to leave your cars/trailers/stuff at the site at your own risk. The site is completely fenced, though, and can only be accessed via gates manned by DIS security staff 24/7.
If you are already registered for the May 7,8 Daytona event, and had your heart absolutely set on the DIS Go Kart track, and you do not want to take the opportunity to run on potentially the best site available in the CFR area, then you can cancel your registration and you will be given a full Credit Card refund. We will be seeking your input - AFTER THE EVENT IS COMPLETED - on what you as our members/participants think of this new site. We look forward to in the future holding events both on this site, as well as the Go Kart track.
Also, if you have already registered for the May 7,8 Daytona event, and would like to attend the Starting Line School, then go to http://www.scca.com/events/1984366-starting-line-daytona register for the school, and cancel your registration for the May 7,8 event on http://www.dlbracing.com/. You will be given a full credit card refund as well, and as part of the Starting Line school, you get a free entry to any of our local events (as well as a lot of other goodies) which if you so desire can be used for our May 8th event.
To Wrap It Up, this site will potentially open up a lot of opportunities for us. In particular, course design flexibility unlike any other site that we have, courses of unprecedented run times for us, and the potential for running two events simultaneously. This includes (if the site and lots of other things work out) the possibility of future SCCA National Tour and/or Pro Solo events. Additionally, DIS has offered the use of this site to CFR SCCA to use even when the CFR SCCA Club Racers are not using the stadium, although it is at a higher cost, and the financial viability of that still needs to be evaluated.
Here is a picture of the site that shows the ingress/egress path, possible paddock, grid, and course area. I have overlaid the outlines of the Geneva main pad, the OCCC North Lot, and the DIS Go Kart track on the potential/available course area showing just how big this site is.
For more information on TRSSS, go to http://streetsurvival.org
To register for the Sep 17, 2016 Daytona TRSSS, go to www.motorsportreg.com
Our current policy was instituted to try to get folks to cancel their registration rather than just "no-show". While we still would like to encourage people to register online, and cancel their registration rather than just "no-show", we have decided that it is not in the best interests of our members/participants to not give refunds when they "no-show". In practice, we have been giving refunds - event credit or credit card refund - to all the no shows as well as the cancels simply because it seemed like the right thing to do.
The new policy is going to follow that model (i.e., the right thing to do), unless the event has a hard cap, and that cap is met. So, assuming there is no cap or the cap is not met, we will give full refunds for both cancellations, as well as "no-shows". If there is a hard cap and the cap is met, you will get a refund if you cancel, but if you are a no-show, you will not get a refund as you have in effect reserved a spot that someone else could have used, but could not. This should not be a situation that arises often, as we have generally been keeping our hard caps pretty high, and we have not been hitting them.
In addition to this, for the future, we are going to by default issue credit card refunds as opposed to event credits. This is a change as currently, we issue event credits by default, and only issue a credit card refund if a specific request is made to email@example.com. In the future, event credits on DlbRacing.com will only be utilized for various special situations that cannot be handled easily by credit card refund. Note: This is a future going policy: We are not going to wipe the existing event credits that are in the DlbRacing.com "vault" so to speak, and we are not going to turn existing event credits into credit card refunds. If you currently have event credits, they will be available for your future use as needed at checkout on DlbRacing.com.
We believe these changes will better and more fairly serve our members and participants. But note that we still would like to encourage ALL folks to cancel their registrations if they can not make it, rather than just not show up. FWIW, that really makes event setup a lot (and I mean A LOT) easier in so many different ways.
There currently is no known way via DlbRacing.com for a guest to register at Brooksville, independently of being registered by a driver, and then, only when that driver registers.
This has caused some of our members some issues in the past, and we are going to now allow guest registration via e-mail. So if you have a guest, or would like to attend a Brooksville event as a guest, you can accomplish this now outside of DlbRacing.com by sending an e-mail to email@example.com with "GUEST REGISTRATION" and the date of the event, "mm/dd/yyyy", in the subject line, with the name of the guest or guests in the text of the message. We will try to acknowledge each guest registration via a reply e-mail. There is no need or request to "un-register" guests, as guests really have no impact on setup of the event.
Note that the "10-day" list policy that we have to abide by with the Brooksville Officials still applies. That is, both DRIVERS AND ALL GUESTS MUST BE REGISTERED 10 DAYS PRIOR TO the day of the event (usually, two Thursdays prior to the Sunday event). This is to allow us to submit the potential on-site names to the Brooksville Officials 10 days in advance per their requirement.
This will not apply for our coming April 17th event, but will apply for all future events. Within DlbRacing.com, you will have an "At Track" option just like all of our other events.
Note: the 10 day advance registration policy will still be in effect, as that is a requirement for our contract with the Brooksville Officials.
Also note, that we encourage pre-payment!
The Jun 26, 2016 EFSC and Sep 18 EFSC events have been cancelled due to an unplanned policy change which has forced the EFSC officials to cease hosting these sorts of events. The EFSC officials are working with us to assist us in finding other venues, and we hope to find suitable sites and dates to make up for these cancelled events.
Permanent numbers can now be reserved for the year on DLB by selecting
this link
Simply select your number and class.
Reserved numbers are on a first come first serve basis. Please pre-register for events to help speed
up the registration process in the morning and also to make sure we have your correct information.
You should also check to verify that your
SCCA membership is up to date for 2014. You can verify your membership on DLB by selecting
"Account Settings" --> "Club Memberships" tab on the DLB page. Enter your SCCA number and choose
Central Florida Region SCCA and click the "verify" button. This allows you to pre-pay with the
SCCA membership rates.
2015 trophy rules and schedule are now available, see sidebar!
Welcome! Your official website for Sports Car Club of America sponsored Autocross and all racing Solo in
and around the Central Florida area.
For more information on SCCA Solo, Club Racing, and Rallycross, visit the SCCA website at
www.scca.org. If you
are not yet familiar with Autocross then read a
short description of Solo here.
As was the case last year, do not forget to bring your driver's license and SCCA membership card to
each event.


text:
Stayed in an apartment at the Jardins da Rocha Sept 15-22. Location was ideal. Nice size apartment with microwave, dishes, pots&pans, etc. Great view of the beach from 19th flr. Front desk staff were great and provided lots of info and assistance. Hotel was just (and I mean just) off the main strip where you could find many shops and restaurants. A little older apartment but rooms were all a fairly big and housekeeping came a number of times during the week (not everyday as it is an apartment not a hotel). The best beach ever was about a minute walk (you have to go down over steps in a number of places along the strip to get to the beach - not great for mobility impaired). Two pools at hotel (1 was kids) with lots of sun chairs available. In Sept not a lot of people around so had no problem getting a chair. Small supermarket nearby but larger (much better) supermarket was a 4 euro taxi ride away. Bus station around the corner. Would stay there again, no hesitation.
- Official Description (provided by the hotel):
- Jardins da Rocha offers unique views of Praia da Rocha and the surrounding areas of Portimao from the balcony of your appartment. Free private parking, a semi olympic swimming pool for adults and a pool for children, a playground, tennis / basketball court and the areas around the building are surrounded by large wooded gardens. It is located 65 kms from Faro airport, 500 metres from the seafront and commercial docks, 3 kms from the railway station and is located in close proximity to intercity buses. Its privileged location, just 80 metres from the beaches Tres Castelos and Rocha, and 100 metres from the centre of Praia da Rocha, make this Jardins da Rocha one of the most popular hotels in the area. Our modern apartments and studios, all with air conditioners, are very well equipped with stove, refrigerator, microwave, coffee maker and electric kettles, toaster and all utensils for cooking. The rooms are maintained throughout the week by our room services including daily cleaning, except on Thursday, Saturday or Sunday, towel change 3 times a week and bed linen changed 2 times a week. ... more less
- Reservation Options:
- TripAdvisor is proud to partner with Wotif.com, Expedia APAC, Hotels.com, HotelTravel.com and Booking.com so you can book your Apartamentos Jardins da Rocha reservations with confidence. We help millions of travellers each month to find the perfect hotel for both holiday and business trips, always with the best discounts and special offers.
- Also Known As:
- Jardins Da Rocha Hotel Praia Da Rocha
- Jardins Da Rocha Praia
- Jardins Rocha
- Apartamentos Jardins Da Rocha Praia Da Rocha, Portugal - Algarve


text:
Mandatory skills:
1. 5 to 7 years experience in the network security area
2.Strong knowledge of network and network firewalls
3.Installation / up gradation of various network firewalls, including Palo altos &
4.Managing day to day network security operations, including security policy
rules implementation, firewall traffic monitoring, hardening of firewalls
5.Good knowledge of intrusion prevention systems & proxy firewalls
6.Auditing network and providing analysis of any potential security threats
7.Good knowledge of information security
8.Understanding of incident, change management and high level
understanding of ITIL processes
Good-to-have skills: Technical -
1.Knowledge of ASA, bluecoats, riverbed and PIX
2.Knowledge of core Cisco data routing and switching elements and protocols
like BGP, EIGPRP
Interpersonal -
1.Ability to Provide Ideas in Users and Team
2.Good interpersonal ,written and oral communication skills
3.Able to prioritize and execute tasks in a high-pressure situation
4.Good working experience in a team-oriented, collaborative Env.
5.Ability to work well independently or in a team setting
6.Strong organizational and documentation skills
Firewall Security Operations Data Routing Switching Information Security