text:
Having undesirable fat in various areas of your body can have a significant effect on your health and self-confidence. While standard weight loss through workout and diet is an excellent way to lose weight overall, even the best exercises can't target problem areas like the belly, inner thighs, arms, and butts. Liposuction is a time checked treatment that is used to eliminate excess fat from specific areas of the body, allowing an individual to form and contour their body to their taste. Is liposuction right for you? Discover now.
Pros of Liposuction
There are many benefits to this cosmetic procedure, including:
• Right away obvious modifications. Unlike standard weight-loss, liposuction produces modifications that are immediately visible in the body. Some difference is visible immediately, and the preferred results are typically attained in just a few days.
• Proven and safe. This cosmetic treatment has actually been carried out by skilled cosmetic surgeons all over the world for many years and the technique has actually been improved over and again to be safe and effective.
• Healing time is usually quick. The downtime needed after having this kind of treatment is normally much less than exactly what is required for other kinds of cosmetic procedures, including tummy tucks, breast reduction, and more. People who have had the treatment can typically go back to work a lot more rapidly than they expected and can get back to living a healthy, active lifestyle.
• Weight reduction can be irreversible. With the ideal upkeep techniques, the fat that was eliminated during the liposuction treatment will not return.
• Complete control over your body. With liposuction, an individual can have complete control over how they wish to look, beyond exactly what conventional diet and exercise can offer. Providing individuals this power over their bodies increases self-esteem and help individuals feel their best.
While there are numerous benefits to liposuction, there are naturally a couple of cautions that should be considered before making the final decision to move on with the procedure.
Cons of Liposuction
Prior to having liposuction done, it's important to examine the potential disadvantages of the procedure and figure out if the advantages outweigh the dangers in your particular case. Your cosmetic surgeon can assist you learn more about the threats associated with the treatment and can assist you decide if progressing is the right thing for you.
• Problems with basic anesthesia. Since liposuction is carried out under basic anesthesia, the procedure brings the exact same risks as any other kind of surgical treatment where general anesthesia is used. Hidden medical conditions might enhance these risks.
• Adverse responses. Bruising, bleeding, and discomfort are all to be expected, however, in unusual cases can trigger more substantial complications.
• The prospective to gain the weight back. After having actually liposuction done, it is critical to keep a healthy diet and workout appropriately as advised by your doctor. Failure to do so could lead to getting back the weight that was lost or perhaps a lot more.
Although there are threats associated with liposuction, for lots of people, the benefits far exceed them. Inform yourself about the treatment by having extensive discussions with your cosmetic surgeon and consider how liposuction has the possible to affect you as a special individual. Only you and your surgeon can figure out if liposuction will offer you with the results you are looking for within your expectations.
Laser Liposuction procedure is a new non invasive procedure to loose unwanted bodyfat in Loysburg Pennsylvania
Laser liposuction is a newer, minimally intrusive procedure that involves heating the fat cells to melting point and getting rid of the melted fat through a little cannula. The procedure is normally done right in your physician's office and is an excellent choice for people who have less than 500 ml of fat to remove from any one area. Laser liposuction can be a safe, complementary procedure to weight-loss in order to shape the body you have actually always desired.
Contact a Cosmetic surgeon in your Loysburg Pennsylvania today.
If you're considering liposuction as a weight loss option, it's important that you discuss your desires with a certified plastic surgeon in your location. Your surgeon will perform a complete test and health history questionnaire to identify if liposuction can benefit you and assist you reach your physical and emotional goals. Call today for an assessment and learn more about how liposuction can help you attain the body of your dreams.


text:
Hi-Tech Anavar
|Hi-Tech Anavar 180 caps. Anavar - World's First and Only Controlled-Release Natural Steroidal Anabolic Agent. Revolutionary Muscle Building Catalyst. THIS IS THE NEW FORMULA! Designed to Increase Strength and lean mass. Anavar, by Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, is the latest creation to be released from the research and development team at Hi-Tech Products.
Elevates Testosterone Levels Throughout the Day.
Increase Anabolic Properties by Promoting Anabolism.
Increases Strength by Stimulating Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP).
Amplifies Nitric Oxide with Revolutionary Arginase Inhibitors.
Extraordinary Profile of 21 Muscle-Building Agents.
Contains L-Arginine and the Arginase Inhibitors ABH and BEC for Maximum Muscle Vasodilation.
Incorporates the Russian Anabolic Agents: Ecdybolin, Ecdysterone, and 6-Keto-Diosgenin.
Formulated with High Dosages of Several Pro Hormone Esters.
Enhanced Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) for Intense Muscular Contraction.
Anavar is a product you consume and within 10-15 minutes you FEEL its effects. Without a doubt, Anavar is going to take the bodybuilding world by storm.
ANAVAR is scientifically formulated to drive ATP or Adenosine Triphosphate into the muscle cells continually for sustained muscle growth. ANAVAR has taken ten years worth of cumulative efforts on behalf of the researchers, physicians, and pharmacologists of Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Hi-Tech has always been an innovator in terms of muscular development. Our company was founded on bodybuilding principles and we have always been on the "cutting edge" of the nutriceutical community. Our focus over the past 7 years has centered around sexual stimulants and weight loss products. Hi-Tech introduced Stamina-Rx® to the market as a revolutionary sexual stimulant in 2001 and shortly after introduced Lipodrene to the market for weight loss. Hi-Tech employs real medical doctors and Pharmacologists to assist our research staff in formulating scientifically based nutriceuticals that work! ANAVAR has a multi-faceted approach that we believe will bring muscle building supplementation to a new level of effectiveness! As companies began distributing pro-hormones into the marketplace with little to no science behind them we decided to put our medical staff to work. Our goal was to find the most effective ergogenic supplements to help build lean muscle mass, increase strength, enhance recovery, and block cortisols catabolic effect on muscle tissue. We achieved this goal with the development of ANAVAR. The name of the product is very fitting as you will later notice due to its mode of action in achieving muscular development.
ANAVAR is scientifically formulated to achieve results that were once only possible through steroids. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. consulted with a small highly technologically advanced research lab in Belize whose staff includes leading biochemists, physiologists, and researchers. Pharmatec, Ltd. in Belize spent years with our researchers developing prototypes and on the science behind ANAVAR. As Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. developed a dozen sexual stimulants prior to the release of Stamina-Rx® we had a few compounds we discovered that held a great deal of promise, but were excluded from our revolutionary formula. We happened upon two compounds BEC and ABH that were intended for a potency product when many of our test subjects reported better pumps, recovery times, and endurance while taking these compounds. Stamina-Rx® was finished in its Research and Development phase and ready to be released to the public. These two compounds were excluded in the formulation as the amount of each component necessary for an ethical dosage precluded our small-hexagonal shaped tablet. A study performed by the research staff at Pharmatec, Ltd. in Belize and Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. revealed the following impact on lean body mass.
Thirty men took ANAVAR daily for 30 days. They observed an average 29% fall in insulin levels. They also found a 109% increase in IGF-1 (a powerful hormone with noticeable effects on body composition), a 19% decrease in body fat, and a 10.3% increase in lean body mass.
Yet another study on women revealed that while taking ANAVAR™ for just 28 days that they decreased body fat levels by 29% while maintaining the same overall body weight. This indicates a significant increase in lean body mass at the expense of body fat.
STEP ONE: Adenosine Triphosphate Saturation
Creatine monohydrate was introduced in the early 1990's under the name Phosphagen® by Ed Byrd. He also invented NOZ®, which is an elevator of Nitric Oxide. Ed Byrd has been at the forefront of two revolutionary products and is a respected member of our industry. Creatine monohydrate is a metabolite that functions as a precursor to creatine phosphate. Once converted to creatine phosphate it provides a "high energy" phosphate molecule for ATP production. ATP or Adenosine Triphosphate is the chemical in our bodies that fuels all muscular contractions. This chain on events is known as the Krebs Cycle. Companies soon began marketing creatine with delivery systems with little to no science behind them to increase profit margins. Hi-Tech never sold any "Creatine Shuttle" product, but only pure 100% Pharmaceutical Grade creatine monohydrate. ANAVAR™ is scientifically formulated to drive ATP into muscle cells continually for sustained muscle growth. Adenosine Triphosphate in fact is nature's "universal energy store" and it explains why phosphates are a vital ingredient in muscle growth and strength.
The 1997 Nobel Prize for Chemistry has been awarded to 3 biochemists for the study of the important biological molecule Adenosine Triphosphate. Humans require a continual supply of energy in order to function. These functions include the metabolism of foods, the synthesis of protein and DNA, and muscle contraction. The energy contained in foods- carbohydrates, protein, or fat – must be stored as energy within Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) molecules before it can be used by any cell in your body. Because of this, and since muscular exercise depends on a steady, often expansive, supply of ATP to provide the energy needed for muscular contractions, muscles needed dependable "metabolic pathways", which can provide ATP at a rapid, reliable rate. ATP usually has a very short "half life" of 8-10 seconds before muscle supplies are used up and creatine must combine with phosphates to form more ATP. A second ATP producing pathway is known as glycolysis, which includes the breakdown of carbohydrates (glucose or glycogen) within muscle cells to form ATP. Glycolysis is the dominant ATP production system for strenuous activities lasting more than 10 seconds. This is where ANAVAR's scientifically formulated product differs from the rest of the industry. ANAVAR™ is able to drive ATP into the muscle cells continually for sustained muscle growth! ANAVAR™ continues to build up ATP "pools" so athletes do not plateau where strength and size no longer increase. How did we achieve this? Our pharmacologists, physicians, and research staff researched the Krebs cycle continuously and finally hit the "Jackpot"! We synthesized Adenosine Triphosphate, Creatine Bitartrate and Creatine Monohydrate, and Inosine and incorporated a proprietary chelation process developed by Pharmatec, Ltd. The above three compounds are first chelated with Aspartic Acid and then chelated a second time in EAP (ethanol amino phosphoric acid), a valuable constituent of human nerve tissue. By chelating these compounds with EAP they are delivered directly to the nerves. And by chelating them with Aspartic Acid they are brought to the muscles. This (Dual Bioavailibility Complex™-DBC™) is formed using a very complex, scientific process where the positive and negative charges create a bend after being placed in a crysolvator at a 20:1 ratio. The proprietary cryosolvation process uses extremely low temperature to process these compounds. Due to this extreme low temperature processing the resulting components are preserved! These processes took years to develop…any products claiming to be even remotely similar are simply lying. What does this mean to athletes? These proprietary compounds now possess the ability to penetrate cell walls of both cardiac and skeletal muscle and once inside promote the manufacture of ATP, the substance in the body that allows muscles to contract. Athletes wishing to exercise longer without experiencing muscle fatigue will benefit from ANAVAR™. This also promotes the production of a little known substance known as 2,3-DPG that is necessary for the transport of oxygen molecules from the red blood cells to the cell for energy. Athletes will experience dramatic strength and endurance gains, which ultimately lead to muscle growth.
STEP TWO: Arginase Inhibition and Elevating Nitric Oxide
ANAVAR™'s second mode of action is to increase nitric oxide to the skeletal muscle to enhance recovery, muscle growth, and endurance. ANAVAR™ does this by its patent-pending arginase inhibitors for muscle growth. The amino acid L-Arginine produces nitric oxide within the body. Research shows that the two primary arginase inhibitors in ANAVAR™ 1) S-(2-boronethyl)-L-Cysteine HCL – known as BEC and 2) 2(S)-Amino-6-boronohexanoic Acid – known as ABH, bind to the natural enzyme arginase. Arginase is what breaks down L-Arginine and renders it useless in the making of nitric oxide. What ANAVAR™ has done is to stop the breakdown of L-Arginine by inhibiting arginase. Nitric oxide was labeled by Science Magazine as the "molecule of the year" and it also won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1998! Nitric oxide is a chemical "trigger" which can ultimately lead to muscle growth. Unfortunately, most Nitric Oxide products on the market today don't accomplish their goal. Hi-Tech manufactured AKG and KIC ten years ago and much like Bell-Bottoms supplement companies have reincarnated these products, but claim they are "New Discoveries". Their effects are modest at best due to their inability to bind to Arginine and the enzyme Nitric Oxide. ANAVAR™ binds tightly to the enzyme Arginase, preventing the enzyme from quickly losing its beneficial effects such as: 1) Increase blood flow delivering more nutrients, ATP, and hormones to muscles; thus allowing muscles to become larger when subject to stress, 2) Increased strength, endurance, and vascularity are also noticeable when taking ANAVAR™.
STEP THREE: Proprietary Non-Steroidal Anabolic Agent
ANAVAR™ incorporates the world's first non-steroidal anabolic agent, 25R, Spirostan-5A-Diol-6-one-3-one, which has a 33:1 anabolic/ androgenic ratio. This has been shown to increase size, strength, lean body mass, and block cortisols catabolic effect on muscle tissue. This amazing compound was discovered by Russian scientist V.N. Syrov in 1976. Our researchers uncovered this discovery in an attempt to find a more effective anabolic agent than any pro-hormones and to minimize androgenic effects also. This compound promotes growth without harmful side effects found in most hormonal products. The 33:1 ratio found for muscular development is an extremely important ration because substances like Testosterone with a 1:1 ratio can shut down your body's leutenizing hormone and Testosterone production.
ANAVAR is the most scientifically based product for muscle growth, strength, lean mass, and endurance. Hi-Tech spends huge sums of money on Research and development. Just as our revolutionary products Stamina-Rx® and Lipodrene® have dramatically impacted their respective categories we think ANAVAR™ will do so in the bodybuilding arena. Just as G.D. Searle discovered Aspartame in 1966 as an ulcer drug and a researcher licked his finger, which was sweet, and now is a popular sweetener. Pfizer developed Viagra® originally as a heart medication only to realize it had a side effects such as patients getting an erection. Hi-Tech originally was developing ABH and BEC as sexual stimulants only to find out that these compounds had amazing muscle building properties. Sometimes you spend enough time and effort you get lucky. With the discovery of BEC and ABH we developed the science behind Adenosine Triphosphate saturation and our non-steroidal anabolic agent to make the incredible product ANAVAR™. ANAVAR™ will allow muscles to "hyper-hydrate" allowing the individual muscle cells to hold extra fluid. The extra fluid capacity increases muscle cell size and effectively pulls more nutrients into the muscle cell where the all-important protein synthesis occurs. ANAVAR™ works within one week and size and strength are rapid and very apparent. Try ANAVAR™ today and see results in the gym and mirror tomorrow!
180 Tablets
Supplement Facts:
Serving Size 3 Tablets
Servings Per Container 60
Amount Per Serving % Daily Value
Proprietary Blend With Extend-Rx™ Technology: 1900mg †
S-(2 Boronethyl) L-Cysteine HCL, 2-(S)-Amino-6-Boronohexanoic Acid, Creatine Ethyl Ester, Creatine Monohydrate, L-Arginine HCL, Inosine Ethyl Ester, Adenosine Triphosphate, 25R Spirosten-5A-Diol-6-One-3-One, Dehydroepiandrosterone Acetate, Dehydroepiandrosterone Cypionate, Dehydroepiandrosterone Propionate, Dehydroepiandrosterone Enanthate, Smilagenin, Hecogenin Acetate, 6-Keto-Diosgenin Cypionate, 6-Keto-Diosgenin Propionate, 6-Keto Diosgenin Acetate 20-HydroxyEcdysone Deconate, Naringen, 6,7 Dihydroxy Bergamottin, Quebracho Blanco HCL.
Other Ingredients: Agglomerated Dextrose, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Hydroxypropylcellulose (Klucel® HXF And HF Brand), Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (Benecel® Brand), Di-Calcium Phosphate, Sodium Starch Glycolate, Starch, Magnesium Stearate, Stearic Acid, Povidone, Silica.
Directions: Take 3 tablets twice daily. Take 3 tablets in the morning and 3 tablets in the afternoon or evening. Do not exceed recommended dosage as Anavar is a potent anabolic agent.
Nutrition Dome Instant Coupon Savings Codes
Code: ship1 for orders between $30.00-$49.99 >> save 2.00
Code: ship2 for orders between $50.00-$99.99 >> save $4.00
Code: ship3 for orders between $100.00-$299.99 >> save $7.00
Code: ship4 over $300.00 >> save $15.00
Nutrition Dome Coupons must be entered at time of order to receive your discount.
Do not leave any spaces when entering coupon code. Coupons cannot be combined.
Please note that manufacturers may make changes to product formulations from time to time.We are not responsible for typographical errors. nutritiondome.com
Problem Ordering? Please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.com
© 2000 - 2013 NutritionDome.com. All Rights Reserved.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
available in PLUS SIZES
available in extended sizes
- roll over image to zoom
First Snow (Triptych)
Color Photograph(ID: A91456)
Created by James BourretLimited Edition
Aspens photographed in early winter. Large format photograph, printed on canvas and mounted in three panels. Limited edition of 25.
other artwork you may like


text:
Regular monthly meet up for a natter and socialise. Food is available at reasonable prices. Usuall 10-20 in attendance - not all members are on meet up!
Meetup members, Log in
By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy


text:
♥ Add EpisodeTube.com to your favorite bar.
Rosewood S02E06
|Watch Online Rosewood: Season 2 Episode 6 (S02E06) Stream
|Air Date: 03/11/2016
Tree Toxins and Three Stories
Plot: Rosewood and Villa enlist the help of Miami's brightest pathology students to investigate a cold case double murder, and their findings lead to a revelation that affects the entire Rosewood family.
Video Links Server Name Language Quality


text:
has anyone ever not known what to say and just said the first word that came to mind ?
like any random word like "potato "
▼Scroll down for more questions▼
Answers (1)
vote up or down the answers
YEP, BUT I ALWAYS SEEEEEEEM THE SAME, CUZ I'M WEIRD, have you ever wondered yellow piranas an a tank?
potato ?
YOU CANNOT OUT WIERD ME YOUNG GIRAFFE! FNNEŒmJd zi z ka zMl.s'PwŒL7-4;7:/)1)7"*)1 ^o^;-))::-D
on April 15
i've sed much wierder and stranger things than thhat
on April 15
on April 15
on April 15


text:
800 N 6th Street
Muscoda, WI 53573
Principal - Shari Hougan
e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com
Chieftain Care News
Please note that Chieftain Care will be closed on the afternoon of December 23rd. We have an early release and we will be closing for Winter Break @ 1:00.
Chieftain Care will be open for the morning session.
Nondiscrimination Statement
It is the policy of the Riverdale School District that no person may be denied admission to any public school in the district or be denied participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be discriminated against in any curricular, co-curricular, student services, career and technical education, recreational or other program or activity because of the person's sex, race, color, national origin, ancestry, creed, religion, pregnancy, martial or parental status, sexual orientation, handicap or physical, mental, emotional or learning disability in the educational programs or activities operated by the Riverdale School District.
Inquiries related to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap and the Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, (ADA) should be directed to:
Jennifer Tarrell
Director of Special Education
800 N 6th St
Muscoda, WI 53573
Any questions concerning Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, inquiries related to Title V (race, color and national origin) and all other discrimination complaints, should be directed to:
Bryce Bird
District Administrator
Riverdale School District
747 N 6th St
Muscoda, WI 53573


text:
in love with my first cousin and need advice on how to deal with it
Started by
This topic has had no activity within the past six months. It is recommended that you start a new topic instead of replying to old topics.
in love with first cousin, How do I deal with this?
4 members have voted
5 posts in this topic
Your content will need to be approved by a moderator


text:
On Second Thought is a one-hour, daily news talk show that airs at 9 a.m. ET weekdays.
Relive the misadventures of headstrong orphan Anne Shirley with our marathon of the family classic "Anne of Green Gables." Sunday, December 11 at 2 PM.
The GHSA state championships for football are right around the corner. There are 16 teams left on the road to the Georgia Dome and by late Saturday night all eight champions for 2016 will be... MORE
GPB Passport is the new member benefit that provides you with extended access to an on-demand library of quality local and national public television programming, including tens of thousands of hours of your favorite programs.
Episode six contained such a huge plot twist that those of us in the chat room emitted collective gasps of "Oh No!" "Oh Snap!" and "UGH!".
Spoiler Alert: If you haven't watched the episode,...


text:
Zephyr Z1C-00HZ None Arc Short 8ft. or 9ft. Ceiling Duct Cover Extension for the Zephyr Arc Collection Horizon Designer Wall Hood
Home > Appliance Stop > Accessory > Duct Cover > Extension
|Zephyr, Z1C-00HZ, Duct Cover, None, Arc, Accessory, Extension Duct Cover ExtensionHaving earned a reputation for well constructed, high-powered range hoods, Zephyr set its sight on redefining the industry by focusing on style and design. Zephyr has seized on the idea that everything in the home is an opportunity for personal expression and elevates the hood to its rightful place: no longer an afterthought, the hood stands above all, as distinctive in its performance as it is in its beauty.Duct Cover Extension (for short 8 or 9 ceilings) for Zephyr s Arc Collection Horizon Designer Wall Hood.
UPC: 646328000393 by Zephyr Part Number: Z1C-00HZ


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
September 28, 2010
LENWOOD MCQUEEN, PETITIONER,v.J. D. HARTLEY, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
RELEVANT HISTORY*fn1
Petitioner is currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) following his convictions in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 1998 of attempted murder with an enhancement for being armed with a weapon, and assault with a deadly weapon resulting in great bodily injury. Petitioner is serving an indeterminate sentence of life plus four years with the possibility of parole.
Petitioner does not challenge his underlying conviction; rather, he challenges a May 28, 2009, decision of the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) denying parole. Petitioner's minimum parole eligibility date was May 29, 2008, and this was Petitioner's second parole suitability hearing. He claims the Board violated his due process rights in its 2009 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. He claims the Board's decision was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court. He further alleges the Board's decision was an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. He contends the superior court erred when it intimated a nexus finding that was not made or articulated by the Board. He alleges the superior court's decision is not supported by the record or some evidence. He claims the factors relied upon were not probative of current dangerousness. He claims the underlying conviction is no longer a predictor of current dangerousness. He contends the Board's reliance on a "lack of insight" was not supported by the record or some evidence. Finally, he asserts the Board violated the Ex Post Facto clause by applying Proposition 9 ("Marsy's Law) to his case.
Petitioner filed a habeas court petition challenging the Board's 2009 decision in the Los Angeles County Superior Court on September 17, 2009. The petition was denied in a reasoned decision on December 1, 2009. Petitioner then filed a state habeas petition in the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, December 29, 2009. The petition was summarily denied on January 14, 2010. He next filed a habeas petition on January 27, 2010, in the California Supreme Court. The petition was summarily denied on March 10, 2010.
Petitioner filed the instant federal petition for writ of habeas corpus on April 7, 2010. Respondent filed an answer to the petition on July 1, 2010. Petitioner filed a traverse on July 21, 2010.
STATEMENT OF FACTS*fn2
On December 28, 1997, at approximately 12:10 a.m., the victim (Petitioner's ex-wife) was walking to her car accompanied by her boyfriend and two children. Petitioner, who was hiding behind a fence on the north side of the premises, suddenly jumped out holding a large knife. He yelled, "I told you I'm going to get you." The victim's boyfriend fled and dialed 9-1-1.
Petitioner began stabbing, punching and kicking the victim. The victim was holding one of the children at the time. Petitioner stabbed the victim ex-wife eight times, stating, "I'm going to kill you." Petitioner caused a non-life-threatening wound to the child, and he also threw the child to the ground during the fray. When the victim fell to the ground, Petitioner grabbed her by the hair and dragged her ten to fifteen feet, whereupon he began to kick her in the torso. The victim feigned death, and Petitioner left. Upon arrival of officers and prior to being transported to the hospital, the victim told officers Petitioner had their seven-year-old child with him. Petitioner was arrested at his house.
I. Standard of Review
On April 24, 1996, Congress enacted the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), which applies to all petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed after its enactment. Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1008 (1997); Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir. 1997), quoting Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 769 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 (1997), overruled on other grounds by Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 (1997) (holding AEDPA only applicable to cases filed after statute's enactment). The instant petition was filed after the enactment of the AEDPA; thus, it is governed by its provisions.
Petitioner is in custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant to a state court judgment. Even though Petitioner is not challenging the underlying state court conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 remains the exclusive vehicle for his habeas petition because he meets the threshold requirement of being in custody pursuant to a state court judgment. Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126-1127 (9th Cir.2006), citing White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1006 (9th Cir.2004) ("Section 2254 'is the exclusive vehicle for a habeas petition by a state prisoner in custody pursuant to a state court judgment, even when the petition is not challenging [her] underlying state court conviction.'").
The instant petition is reviewed under the provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act which became effective on April 24, 1996. Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 70 (2003). Under the AEDPA, an application for habeas corpus will not be granted unless the adjudication of the claim "resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States" or "resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State Court proceeding." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see Lockyer, 538 U.S. at 70-71; Williams, 529 U.S. at 413.
"[A] federal court may not issue the writ simply because the court concludes in its independent judgment that the relevant state court decision applied clearly established federal law erroneously or incorrectly. Rather, that application must also be unreasonable." Id. at 411. A federal habeas court making the "unreasonable application" inquiry should ask whether the state court's application of clearly established federal law was "objectively unreasonable." Id. at 409. Petitioner has the burden of establishing that the decision of the state court is contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of United States Supreme Court precedent. Baylor v. Estelle, 94 F.3d 1321, 1325 (9th Cir. 1996). Although only Supreme Court law is binding on the states, Ninth Circuit precedent remains relevant persuasive authority in determining whether a state court decision is objectively unreasonable. See Clark v. Murphy, 331 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir.2003); Duhaime v. Ducharme, 200 F.3d 597, 600-01 (9th Cir.1999).
II. Review of Petition
There is no independent right to parole under the United States Constitution; rather, the right exists and is created by the substantive state law which defines the parole scheme. Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 559, 561 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (citing Bd. of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 371 (1987); Pearson v. Muntz, No. 08-55728, 2010 WL 2108964, * 2 (9th Cir. May 24, 2010) (citing Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 221, 125 S.Ct. 2384, 162 L.Ed.2d 174 (2005)); Cooke v. Solis, No. 06-15444, 2010 WL 2330283, *6 (9th Cir. June 4, 2010). "[D]espite the necessarily subjective and predictive nature of the parole-release decision, state statutes may create liberty interests in parole release that are entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause." Bd. of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. at 371.
In California, the Board of Parole Hearings' determination of whether an inmate is suitable for parole is controlled by the following regulations:
(a) General. The panel shall first determine whether the life prisoner is suitable for release on parole. Regardless of the length of time served, a life prisoner shall be found unsuitable for a denied parole if in the judgment of the panel the prisoner will pose an unreasonable risk of danger to society if released from prison.
(b) Information Considered. All relevant, reliable information available to the panel shall be considered in determining suitability for parole. Such information shall include the circumstances of the prisoner's social history; past and present mental state; past criminal history, including involvement in other criminal misconduct which is reliably documented; the base and other commitment offenses, including behavior before, during and after the crime; past and present attitude toward the crime; any conditions of treatment or control, including the use of special conditions under which the prisoner may safely be released to the community; and any other information which bears on the prisoner's suitability for release. Circumstances which taken alone may not firmly establish unsuitability for parole may contribute to a pattern which results in a finding of unsuitability.
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, §§ 2402(a) and (b). Section 2402(c) sets forth circumstances tending to demonstrate unsuitability for release. "Circumstances tending to indicate unsuitability include:
(1) Commitment Offense. The prisoner committed the offense in an especially heinous, atrocious or cruel manner. The factors to be considered include:
(A) Multiple victims were attacked, injured or killed in the same or separate incidents.
(B) The offense was carried out in a dispassionate and calculated manner, such as an execution-style murder.
(C) The victim was abused, defiled or mutilated during or after the offense.(D) The offense was carried out in a manner which demonstrates an exceptionally callous disregard for human suffering.
(E) The motive for the crime is inexplicable or very trivial in relation to the offense.
(2) Previous Record of Violence. The prisoner on previous occasions inflicted or attempted to inflict serious injury on a victim, particularly if the prisoner demonstrated serious assaultive behavior at an early age.
(3) Unstable Social History. The prisoner has a history of unstable or tumultuous relationships with others.'
(4) Sadistic Sexual Offenses. The prisoner has previously sexually assaulted another in a manner calculated to inflict unusual pain or fear upon the victim.
(5) Psychological Factors. The prisoner has a lengthy history of severe mental problems related to the offense.
(6) Institutional Behavior. The prisoner has engaged in serious misconduct in prison or jail.
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 2402(c)(1)(A)-(E),(2)-(9).
Section 2402(d) sets forth the circumstances tending to show suitability which include:
(1) No Juvenile Record. The prisoner does not have a record of assaulting others as a juvenile or committing crimes with a potential of personal harm to victims.
(2) Stable Social History. The prisoner has experienced reasonably stable relationships with others.
(3) Signs of Remorse. The prisoner performed acts which tend to indicate the presence of remorse, such as attempting to repair the damage, seeking help for or relieving suffering of the victim, or indicating that he understands the nature and magnitude of the offense.
(4) Motivation for Crime. The prisoner committed his crime as a result of significant stress in his life, especially if the stress has built over a long period of time.
(5) Battered Woman Syndrome. At the time of the commission of the crime, the prisoner suffered from Battered Woman Syndrome, as defined in section 2000(b), and it appears the criminal behavior was the result of that victimization.
(6) Lack of Criminal History. The prisoner lacks any significant history of violent crime.
(7) Age. The prisoner's present age reduces the probability of recidivism.
(8) Understanding and Plans for Future. The prisoner has made realistic plans for release or has developed marketable skills that can be put to use upon release.
(9) Institutional Behavior. Institutional activities indicate an enhanced ability to function within the law upon release.
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 2402(d)(1)-(9)
The California parole scheme entitles the prisoner to a parole hearing and various procedural guarantees and rights before, at, and after the hearing. Cal. Penal Code § 3041.5. If denied parole, the prisoner is entitled to subsequent hearings at intervals set by statute. Id. In addition, if the Board or Governor find the prisoner unsuitable for release, the prisoner is entitled to a written explanation. Cal. Penal Code §§ 3041.2, 3041.5. The denial of parole must also be supported by "some evidence," but review of the Board's or Governor's decision is extremely deferential. In re Rosenkrantz, 29 Cal.4th 616, 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 104, 59 P.3d 174, 210 (2002).
Because California's statutory parole scheme guarantees that prisoners will not be denied parole absent some evidence of present dangerousness, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held California law creates a liberty interest in parole that may be enforced under the Due Process Clause. Hayward v. Marshall, 602 F.3d at 561-563; Pearson v. Muntz, 606 F.3d 606, 608-609 (9th Cir. 2010). Therefore, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, this Court's ultimate determination is whether the state court's application of the some evidence rule was unreasonable or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. Hayward v. Marshall. 603 F.3d at 563; Pearson v. Muntz, 606 F.3d at 608.
The applicable California standard "is whether some evidence supports the decision of the Board or the Governor that the inmate constitutes a current threat to public safety, and not merely whether some evidence confirms the existence of certain factual findings." In re Lawrence, 44 Cal.4th 1181, 1212 (2008) (emphasis in original and citations omitted). As to the circumstances of the commitment offense, the Lawrence Court concluded that although the Board and the Governor may rely upon the aggravated circumstances of the commitment offense as a basis for a decision denying parole, the aggravated nature of the crime does not in and of itself provide some evidence of current dangerousness to the public unless the record also establishes that something in the prisoner's pre- or post-incarceration history, or his or her current demeanor and mental state, indicates that the implications regarding the prisoner's dangerousness that derive from his or her commission of the commitment offense remain probative to the statutory determination of a continuing threat to public safety.
Id. at 1214.
In addition, "the circumstances of the commitment offense (or any of the other factors related to unsuitability) establish unsuitability if, and only if, those circumstances are probative to the determination that a prison remains a danger to the public. It is not the existence or nonexistence of suitability or unsuitability factors that forms the crux of the parole decision; the significant circumstance is how those factors interrelate to support a conclusion of current dangerousness to the public." In re Lawrence, 44 Cal.4th at 1212.
"In sum, a reviewing court must consider 'whether the identified facts are probative to the central issue of current dangerousness when considered in light of the full record before the Board or the Governor.'" Cooke v. Solis, 606 F.3d 1206, 1214 (9th Cir. 2010) (emphasis in original) (citing Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d at 560).
A. Last Reasoned State Court Decision
In the last reasoned decision, the Los Angeles County Superior Court rejected Petitioner's claims as follows:
The Board found the Petitioner unsuitable for parole after a parole consideration hearing held on May 28, 2009. The Petitioner was denied parole for three years. The Board concluded that the Petitioner was unsuitable for parole and would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to society and a threat to public safety if he is released. The Board based its decision primarily on the commitment offense and his lack of insight as to the underlying causes of his offense.
The Court finds that there is some evidence to support the Board's finding that the commitment offense was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel because it was carried out in a manner which demonstrates an exceptionally callous disregard for human suffering. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2402, subd. (c)(1)(D). The Petitioner stabbed the victim eight times, and only stopped when she pretended to be dead. This record provides some evidence that the petitioner caused great human suffering. Additionally, there were multiple victims attacked, as the victim was holding a child who was also injured, though not critically.
However, the Board may base a denial or reversal of parole on the circumstances of the commitment offense, or other immutable factors, only if those facts support the ultimate conclusion that the inmate continues to pose an unreasonable risk to public safety. In re Lawrence (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1181, 1221. Thus, the relevant inquiry is whether the circumstances of the commitment offense, and the Petitioner's criminal history, when considered in light of other facts in the record, including the passage of time and attendant changes in the inmate's psychological or mental attitude, are such that they continue to be predictive of current dangerousness. Id.
The Court finds that there were significant additional factors which are predictive of current dangerousness. The Board found that the petitioner minimized his conduct by stating that he had a knife to protect himself from the victim's boyfriend, who had run away. Although the Board notes that the petitioner admits to and does not refute the mechanics and very specifics of the crime, the Board properly considered the Petitioner's lack of insight, as they are relevant to a determination of his suitability for parole. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2402(b); In re Shaputis (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1241, 1260.
Further, the Court finds that the record indicates that the petitioner had been involved in a pattern of anger mismanagement and abuse against women for an extensive period of time prior to the committing offense. The petitioner also violated restraining orders that were held against him. If an offense is the culmination of many years of abuse, or occurs after a pattern of violent and brutalizing behavior, it may be some evidence of current dangerousness. In re Shaputis (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1241, 1259.
The Board also found that the District Attorney's Office and Los Angeles Police Department had opposed the Petitioner's release. While this is not a factor on which the Board may rely to deny parole, such opposition may be properly considered. Penal Code § 3042.
The Board also noted several positive gains that the Petitioner has achieved while incarcerated. The petitioner had a generally positive institutional record, a positive work record, and has programmed extensively. However, it concluded that despite these gains, the petitioner posed an unreasonable threat to public safety at the time of its hearing. Penal Code § 3041(b).
Finally, subsequent hearings for inmates who are not granted parole must be scheduled 15 years after a finding of unsuitability, unless the Board finds by clear and convincing evidence that public safety does not require that additional period of incarceration. Penal Code § 3041.5(b)(3). Here, the Board determined by clear and convincing evidence that the Petitioner does not require more than three years of incarceration. The Court finds that, in light of the facts of the record, this was not a manifest abuse of the Board's broad discretion under the presumption. (See Resp't's Ex. 2.)
B. 2009 Board Hearing
As discussed by the superior court, the Board found Petitioner unsuitable for parole based on the circumstances of the commitment offense, prior criminality relating to the commitment offense, lack of insight, and oppositions from the Los Angeles County Police Department and Office of the Los Angeles District Attorney.
The Board determined that the commitment offense was especially heinous, atrocious and cruel, because the manner in which it was carried out demonstrated an exceptionally callous disregard for human suffering. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2402(c)(1)(D). In finding some evidence supported this finding, the superior court noted that Petitioner repeatedly stabbed the victim and only stopped when she feigned death. In addition, the record reflects Petitioner also kicked, punched, and dragged the victim even after she had been stabbed. Certainly the superior court's finding was not unreasonable. In addition, the Board found that Petitioner had attacked multiple victims. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2402(c)(1)(A). The superior court determined there was some evidence to support this finding since Petitioner attacked not only his ex-wife, but also the child she was holding.
The Board also noted that Petitioner had a history of escalating criminal behavior relating to the commitment offense. The superior court determined the evidence showed Petitioner had been involved in a pattern of anger mismanagement and abuse against women for an extensive period of time prior to the offense. This finding was supported by previous incidents of domestic violence and violations of restraining orders against the victim.
The California Supreme Court has held that "[t]he nature of the prisoner's offense, alone, can constitute a sufficient basis for denying parole." In re Rosenkrantz, 29 Cal.4th 616, 682 (2002). However, in cases where prisoners have served their suggested base terms and have demonstrated strong evidence of rehabilitation and no other evidence of current dangerousness, the underlying circumstances of the commitment offense alone rarely will provide a valid basis for denying parole. In re Lawrence, 44 Cal.4th 1191, 1211 (2008). In this case, the Board did not rely on the commitment offense alone.
The Board found that Petitioner lacked sufficient insight into the crime. It is undisputed that Petitioner took full responsibility for the mechanics of the crime, in that he admitted he stabbed, kicked, and punched the victim in the manner reflected in the record. However, the Board found it very troubling that Petitioner minimized his conduct by stating he only brought the knife for protection from the boyfriend. The Board found Petitioner's characterization was not credible given that the boyfriend immediately fled the scene and thus erased any need for Petitioner to continue wielding the knife. In addition, Petitioner had lain in wait for the victim and then attacked her, stating, "I told you I'm going to get you," and "I'm going to kill you." As discussed by the Board, these facts show a clear plan, and they do not support Petitioner's contention that he did not have the intent to attack the victim when he confronted her, and that he had armed himself only for the sake of personal protection. The Board also noted that Petitioner had brought up in a prior psychological report the fact that the victim wore a heavy jacket, implying he did not believe she would be seriously hurt. All of these facts support the Board's determination that Petitioner did not have the requisite insight into the causative factors of the offense. They further support the Board's determination that Petitioner's lack of insight caused him to remain an unreasonable risk of danger to the public, in particular, women who he might become involved with, should he be released from prison. "An inmate's version of the offense may indicate a lack of insight and provide a nexus between the offense and his current dangerousness." In re Shaputis, 44 Cal.4th 1241, 1260 (2008). The superior court's determination that some evidence supported the Board's finding was not unreasonable.
Finally, the Board considered the oppositions of the District Attorney's Office and the Los Angeles Police Department. While not a factor that can be relied on to deny parole, it can be properly considered pursuant to Cal. Penal Code § 3042 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2402(b).
The Board also considered numerous factors in support of suitability. Petitioner was commended for a clean disciplinary record. He had a good work record with multiple laudatory statements. He had programmed extensively and in an exemplary fashion. He had obtained several vocations and earned his GED. His parole plans were viable and positive, and he had means to support himself once released. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that the positive aspects of Petitioner's behavior did not outweigh the factors of unsuitability. In light of the circumstances of Petitioner's commitment offense, his escalating violent behavior relating to the victim, and his lack of insight into the causative aspects of the offense, the state courts' determination that there was some evidence to support the Board's 2009 decision is not an unreasonable application of California's some evidence standard, nor an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the record. Although Petitioner maintains that factors such as the commitment offense and unstable social history are too old to offer any value, they are relevant to predicting a risk of future violence when tied to Petitioner's lack of insight and minimization of his conduct. Accordingly, federal habeas corpus relief is unavailable.
Petitioner also contends the Board's implementation of Proposition 9 violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws. The Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits the states from passing any "ex post facto law," a prohibition that "is aimed at laws 'that retroactively alter the definition of crimes or increase the punishment for criminal acts.'" Cal. Dept. of Corrections v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499, 504 (1995); see also Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 28 (1981) (providing that "[t]he ex post facto prohibition forbids the Congress and the States to enact any law 'which imposes a punishment for an act which was not punishable at the time it was committed; or imposes additional punishment to that then prescribed.'"). The United States Supreme Court has held that "[r]etroactive changes in laws governing parole of prisoners, in some instances, may be violative of this precept." Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244, 250 (2000).
On November 4, 2008, California voters passed Proposition 9, the "Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy's Law," which, inter alia, altered the frequency of parole hearings for prisoners not found suitable for parole. Prior to the passage of Proposition 9, in the event a prisoner was determined unsuitable for parole, a subsequent parole hearing would be held annually thereafter. Cal Penal Code § 3041.5(b)(2) (2008). If the parole board determined it was not reasonable to expect parole would be granted within the next year, it could defer rehearing for two years. Id. If the prisoner was convicted of murder and it was not reasonable to expect he/she would be granted parole within the year, the board could select a rehearing term of up to five years. Id. Proposition 9 changed the frequency of subsequent parole hearings as follows:
The board shall schedule the next hearing, after considering the views and interests of the victim, as follows:
(A) Fifteen years after any hearing at which parole is denied, unless the board finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criteria relevant to the setting of parole release dates enumerated in subdivision (a) of Section 3041 are such that consideration of the public and victim's safety does not require a more lengthy period of incarceration for the prisoner than 10 additional years.
(B) Ten years after any hearing at which parole is denied, unless the board finds by clear and convincing evidence that... consideration of the public and victim's safety does not require a more lengthy period of incarceration for the prisoner than seven additional years.
(C) Three years, five years, or seven years after any hearing at which parole is denied, because... consideration of the public and victim's safety requires a more lengthy period of incarceration for the prisoner, but does not require a more lengthy period of incarceration for the prisoner than seven additional years.
Cal. Penal Code § 3041.5(b)(3) (November 4, 2008).
Petitioner claims an ex post facto violation occurred when Proposition 9 was applied to him retroactively. Prior to passage of Proposition 9, Petitioner was eligible for annual parole review hearings. Petitioner asserts that with the passage of Proposition 9, the minimum time he must serve before a subsequent parole hearing is now three years. In this case, the Court does not find an ex post facto violation.
In Morales, a California statute changed the frequency of reconsideration hearings for parole from every year to up to three years for prisoners convicted of more than one murder. 514 U.S. at 503. The Supreme Court determined the statute did not violate ex post facto because the retroactive application of the change in California law did not create "'a sufficient risk of increasing the measure of punishment attached to the covered crimes.'" Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244, 250 (2000), quoting, Morales, 514 U.S. at 509. The Supreme Court noted that the law "did not modify the statutory punishment for any particular offenses," it did not "alter the standards for determining either the initial date of parole eligibility or an inmate's suitability for parole," and it "did not change the basic structure of California's parole law." Garner, 529 U.S. at 250, citing, Morales, 514 U.S. at 507. Likewise, in this case Proposition 9 did not modify the punishment for Petitioner's offense of attempted murder, it did not alter his initial parole eligibility date, and it did not change the basic structure of California's parole law. The board must consider the same factors in determining parole suitability as before. See Cal. Penal Code 3041(b); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2402(b).
Nevertheless as noted above, in Garner the Supreme Court found that "[r]etroactive changes in laws governing parole of prisoners, in some instances, may be violative of this precept." 529 U.S. at 250. In Garner, the Supreme Court determined that an amendment to Georgia's parole law did not violate ex post facto even where the frequency of reconsideration hearings was changed from every three years to every eight years. Id. at 256. The Court held that it could not conclude that the change in Georgia law lengthened the prisoner's time of actual imprisonment because Georgia law vested broad discretion with the parole board to set a prisoner's date of rehearing. Id. at 254-56. In addition, the Court found it significant that the parole board's own policies permitted "expedited parole reviews in the event of a change in [a prisoner's] circumstance or where the Board receives new information that would warrant a sooner review." Id. at 254 [Citation.].
Here, the California parole board is still vested with broad discretion in selecting a date of rehearing from three years to 15 years. While it is true that Petitioner is no longer eligible for annual parole review hearings as determined by the Board, and a date must be set at the minimum of three years, the Board retains the discretion, as did the Georgia parole board in Garner, to advance a hearing at any time should there be a change in circumstances. Pursuant to Cal. Penal Code § 3041.5(b)(4), the Board may in its discretion, after considering the views and interests of the victim, advance a hearing set pursuant to paragraph (3) to an earlier date, when a change in circumstances or new information establishes a reasonable likelihood that consideration of the public and victim's safety does not require the additional period of incarceration of the prisoner provided in paragraph (3).
Based on the Supreme Court's holding in Garner, this Court does not find, and Petitioner has not demonstrated, that Proposition 9 creates more than just a "speculative and attenuated possibility of producing the prohibited effect of increasing the measure of punishment for covered crimes."
Garner, 529 U.S. at 251, quoting, Morales, 514 U.S. at 509. For the above reasons, Petitioner's challenge to Proposition 9 must fail.
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
1. The instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED; and
2. The Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment in favor of Respondent.
This Findings and Recommendation is submitted to the assigned United States District Court Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. section 636 (b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Within thirty (30) days after being served with a copy, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation." Replies to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the objections. The Court will then review the Magistrate Judge's ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Check in from 2:00 PM / Check out prior to 11:00 AM
Eastern Light International Hotel: Find photos, reviews, information, amenities and compare prices for 4 stars hotels in Qingdao, China.
Eastern Light International Hotel offers 4-star accommodation in Qingdao. The multiple facilities this elegant hotel has to offer include an express check-in and check-out feature, a coffee bar and an executive floor.
Hotel description
Eastern Light Hotel features a 24-hour reception, as well as meeting rooms and a concierge. For added convenience, it offers a ticket service, luggage storage and a currency exchange.
The cosy rooms include slippers, a mini bar and a refrigerator. Each comes with free tea and coffee making facilities and an en suite.
Guests can wake up to a varied breakfast, which is served every morning.
Qingdao Liuting International Airport is less than a 35-minute drive from Eastern Light International Hotel Qingdao. The hotel's multilingual staff are available to ensure that every guest has a comfortable visit.
Hotel features
Restaurant, Air Conditioned, Mini Bar, Refrigerator, Cable / Satellite TV, Coffee / Tea Maker, TV, Shower, En suite, Private Bathroom
Business Center, Concierge, Elevator / Lift, 24 Hour Reception, Dry Cleaning, Conference Room(s), Currency Exchange, Multilingual Staff, Safe-Deposit Box, ATM / Cash Machine, Wake-up Service, Meeting Rooms, Laundry service, Shops, Photocopier, Ticket Service, Luggage Storage, Designated Smoking Area, Shops in Hotel, Express Check-In/Check-Out, Self Laundry
Fitness Room/Gym, Bath / Hot Tub
High-speed Internet
Parking, Airport shuttle
Private Toilet, Executive Floor, Shoe Shine
Availability and Prices
Booking Site
Room Type
Per room
Per night
Per night
Users who viewed Eastern Light International Hotel also viewed these 4 stars Qingdao hotels:
Gloria Garden Resort Qingdao
19 Zhengyangguan Road Badaguan Scenic Area, Qingdao
19 Zhengyangguan Road Badaguan Scenic Area, Qingdao
Four Points by Sheraton Qingdao Chengyang
271 Wenyang Road, Qingdao
271 Wenyang Road, Qingdao
Century Hotel Jiaozhou
Zhengzhou West Road 2, Jiaozhou, Qingdao
Zhengzhou West Road 2, Jiaozhou, Qingdao
Search hotels
based on
138 reviews
Nearest hotels
- Yishangjia Hotel
0.1 miles
- Central Business Hotel
0.1 miles
- Zhongyang Business Hotel Shinan
0.1 miles


text:
Bettison: IPCC report
A report reveals the role the former Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, Sir Norman Bettison, played in the aftermath of the Hillsborough Disaster.
A report reveals the role the former Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, Sir Norman Bettison, played in the aftermath of the Hillsborough Disaster.
The IPCC has recognised that my client, Sir Norman Bettison, did himself wish to be investigated by the IPCC in connection with allegations made in respect of Hillsborough. He remains keen to see that the investigation into the substantive matters is progressed as quickly as possible. The IPCC has decided that it considers my client acted improperly in seeking approval from the Police Authority to refer himself to the IPCC. The decision that there is a case to answer, is not a finding of guilt.
This point is accepted, explicitly, in the foreword of the IPCC report and it therefore sits, uncomfortably, with some of the comments in the investigator's report, made after an incomplete investigation. Sir Norman voluntarily attended interview, provided a written statement and invited the IPCC to interview witnesses.
Since there can be no formal misconduct hearing my client is denied the opportunity to call those witnesses, which the IPCC declined to interview, and is denied the opportunity to put his case and challenge other evidence, which calls into question the fairness of such a process.
Any showers clearing with clear spells developing overnight
North Yorkshire Police are appealing for information after four iPhones were stolen from a shop in Skipton.
Humberside Police are advising that people avoid the M180 due to a fuel spillage.


text:
Granny flat
Granny flat
1 Bedrooms
1 Beds
1 Bathrooms
1 Baths
|Room Type
|Private room
|Ensuite bathroom
|Length of Stay
|Minimum 6 months
|Anyone welcome
|Weekly rent
|4 weeks rent
|Included in rent
|Available but not included in rent
|No parking
Studio/GrannyFlat. Single Occupant non-smoker only. Want something a little out of the ordinary? Would you like to have your own space that you do not have to share with others? On offer is this quirky self -contained, fully furnished and equipped, apartment-style studio with unlimited super fast internet, water and electricity included. Great value for singles who don't want to share with others. Purpose designed for a student. Imagine having an ensuite bedroom, private lounge/study/ kitchen & laundry facilities all to yourself. Including private entry, linen, kingsize bed, 2x desk(s) and chairs, TVs, lounge and more. Very convenient to frequent transport and Sunnybank shops and easy access to Griffith, UQ and QUT. Fully equiped modern kitchen including crockery dishwasher etc. Also includes clothes washing machine that you also do not have to share with anyone else. Electricity, water and garden maintenance & optus "superfast" wireless internet is included. Air-conditioning (keep cool in summer/warm in winter) is metered to encourage responsible usage. In keeping with Brisbane city council, laws, maximum of 1 student only. Bond is 4 x weeks rent and submitted to RTA. Off street parking (through electric gates) available. Absolutely Non smoker only. Clean and tidy. Quality! Inspection will confirm excellent value. Single occupant.Thank you for reading the detail.
Example Journey Planner to UQ copied below:
8.35am - 8.36am Walk 72m to Mains Rd at Turton Street, stop 80, Sunnybank
8.36am - 9.03am Catch bus 139 UQ Lakes to UQ Lakes station, St Lucia
9.03am - 9.09am Walk 663m over bridge to University Of Queensland St LuciaCompletely Self Contained
Fully Furnished
Very convenient to Sunnybank Shops
Access to own washing machine
No pets
Non-smokers only pleaseContact to receive link to additional images
Unlimited Optus Superfast Internet included
Purpose designed student accommodation


text:
Gregg Leakes Celebrity Watchlist
Gregg Leakes
Video ClipsSee all »
NeNe and Gregg Leakes Apologize02:26 — NeNe and Gregg try to smooth things over with Cynthia and Peter after the confrontation in Mexico.
Gregg Sprinkles NeNe With Powder?02:03 — Gregg Leakes reveals how he keeps the romance alive with NeNe during their morning routine.
Who's the Hottest Housewife?00:55 — The men share their picks for the most attractive Atlanta 'Wives (besides their own of course).
Gregg and Peter's Fight: The Highlight Reel01:41 — Check out all the highlights from Peter Thomas and Gregg Leakes' fight.
Trending TonightSee all »
This Is Us9:00 pm | NBCI'll Watch559 Watching
NCIS8:00 pm | CBSI'll Watch525 Watching
The Flash8:00 pm | CWI'll Watch465 Watching
Watch This
Who's the Biggest Troublemaker on the Set of Chicago Fire?
It's unanimous!
Popular Shows
Popular Movies
- 1. War Dogs
- 2. Pete's Dragon
- 3. Sausage Party
- 4. Suicide Squad
- 5. Star Trek Beyond
- 6. Jason Bourne
- 7. Captain America: Civil War
Popular Celebrities
- 1. Rami Malek
- 2. Taylor Schilling
- 3. Constance Zimmer
- 4. Emilia Clarke
- 5. Tom Hiddleston
- 6. Kit Harington
- 7. Gina Rodriguez


text:
Buy your tickets online for the Holiday Extravaganza, Dec. 8, 9 & 10. Seats are $6 each. Click the link below to purchase.
Volunteer to help at the Holiday Extravaganza! Instrumental music is in charge of Friday Dec. 9th and shares Saturday Dec. 10th with vocal music. Click the link below to sign up!
Bear Creek High School instrumental Music Electronic Handbook
Parent Information Night Presentation
Parent Information Meeting
Parent Information Meeting
Private String Teachers: click to access this list of contact information
Colorado Conservatory for the Jazz Arts information available here.
2016-2017 Instrumental Forms available HERE.


text:
You can't spend earnings! At first glance, this seems like an odd statement, possibly even incorrect. However, it is not only correct, but an important axiom for all types of investors. Through fraud and manipulation financial statements can be made to look quite impressive, but the cash that arrives in your brokerage account is real.
An increasing cash dividend keeps pressure on management to ensure the company is well run. If there are too many missteps, eventually the dividend will slip. Here are several stocks where management recently met the challenge by raising their cash dividends:
Hickory Tech Corporation (OTCPK:HTCO), doing business as HickoryTech and Enventis, provides integrated communication services to business and residential customers. October 3, the company increased its quarterly dividend 3.4% to $0.15 per share. The dividend is payable Dec. 5, 2013, to shareholders of record on Nov. 15, 2013. The yield based on the new payout is 5.4%.
Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) operates as an independent downstream energy company. October 2, the company increased its quarterly dividend 25% to $0.39 per share. The dividend is payable on Dec. 2, 2013, to shareholders of record at the close of business on Nov. 14, 2013. The yield based on the new payout is 4.0%.
Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (KRFT) operates as a consumer packaged food and beverage company in North America. October 2, the company increased its quarterly dividend 5% to $0.525 per share. The dividend is payable Oct. 25, 2013, to shareholders of record as of Oct. 11, 2013. The yield based on the new payout is 4.0%.
LTC Properties, Inc. (NYSE:LTC) operates as a healthcare real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. October 1, the company increased its monthly dividend 9.7% to to $0.17 per share. The company declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.17 per share per month for the months of October, November and December 2013, payable on October 31, November 29, and December 31, 2013, respectively, to stockholders of record on October 23, November 21, and December 23, 2013, respectively. The yield based on the new payout is 5.2%.
Full Disclosure: No position in the aforementioned securities. See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here.
Disclaimer: Selecting stocks with increasing dividends is critical for an income growth strategy. The above list contains stocks that recently raised their dividends; it is not a list of recommend buys. As always, due diligence should be performed before buying or selling any stock. For a list of stocks with a long string of consecutive cash dividend increases, see this list.


text:
Cry of the Hawk Cry of the Hawk
Cry of the Hawk Cry of the Hawk
The Plainsmen the Plainsmen
Domain, Mass Market Paperback, 9780553562408, 480pp.
Publication Date: August 1, 1993
List Price: $7.99*
* Individual store prices may vary.
Buy at Local Store
Enter your zip code below to purchase from an indie close to you.
Not Currently Available for Direct Purchase
Bestselling American frontier novelist Terry C. Johnston has created an extraordinary, authentic saga of war, loss, and human struggle. This masterwork captures the complex, bloody tapestry of a land of men unchecked by the law, of native warriors continually betrayed, and of ever-expanding railroads.


text: + Article code: BLPRB3 Barbell – Hearts Surgical Steel 316L/Acryl Please select M Barbell made of surgical steel featuring two threaded balls with a heart print in yummy candy colours. A funky eye-catcher that will look fab in your tongue piercing. Love is the message! Share × $1.40 + - Add to cart


text:
|Deaf Singles
WHAT THEY SAY: Deaf people connect each day to find friendship, love, and romance. Search profiles for thousands of deaf singles in your area and throughout the world. Comfortable environment bringing hearing-impaired singles together. Deaf singles enjoy chat rooms, message boards, photo personals, a photo gallery, anonymous private mailboxes, and much more.
WHAT WE FOUND: Deaf Singles Connection is a specialty service for deaf people and people that are part of this otherly abled lifestyle that understand ASL. We like the simple registration form and the options of information that you can decide to share or keep private. Free members have several features to test out the service (the guest or free trial membership is free and has no time limit), including posting pictures with their profile and sending and receiving 'smiles' which are short notes of interest that you can send to other members. You can also send and receive ecards within the community of members and browse and search other members profiles. Upgraded members can post to the forums, use the instant messenger to chat with other online members, enter the chat rooms and send and receive unlimited messages. We like the ability of turning off your profile so that you aren't available to be sent messages if you want to 'hide' without canceling your membership. Overall Deaf Singles is easy to use and has a lot of member-friendly features that can be found at bigger dating services without the crowds of incompatible members.
WHAT YOU'LL FIND: Free guest membership has limited features including sending and receiving smiles to other members, searches and posting photos. Upgraded members have full access of all features including sending and replying to messages, live chat and Instant Messenger chat.
RELATED CATEGORIES: America - Canada - Disabled
~~~ Do you have any comments about this dating service or
it's review?
Today's Question
Popular Advice Ebooks
Free Ebooks
Visit our ebook page with many free ebooks. Browse and download. You can download:
More Ebooks
aLoveLinksPlus Singles Dating Membership: Login | Join Free
aLoveLinksPlus.com Sitemap
BigChurch.com: Meet Christian Singles Today!
Online Dating at FastCupid.com
Register for free now at match.co.uk
PerfectMatch #1 Trusted Online Dating Site - The Best Approach to Finding the Right Person for You.
Find Love at BBWPersonalsPlus.com!
Match.com: Find Singles Near You for FREE
Match Affinity: Start Your Next Relationship Here
Personalabs.com: Quick, affordable, and discreet health testing, drug testing, and sexually transmitted disease testing. 5% off with coupon code HEALTHY
Get 15% Off! at BuyCostumes.com
DATING sites come and DATING sites go, PLEASE let us know of any BROKEN LINKS HERE ~~


text:
A State Supreme Court justice yesterday rejected a request for bail from the two lead suspects in the disappearance of Irene Silverman, a wealthy Upper East Side widow, and ordered them held in New York until Aug. 6. Lawyers for the pair, Sante Kimes, 64, and her son, Kenneth, 23, said they would appeal the ruling in the State Supreme Court's Appellate Division early next week.
''The prosecutors are making all kinds of accusations which are unfounded,'' Mel A. Sachs, Mr. Kimes's lawyer, said after the ruling. ''It's unfair that these individuals are being treated as if they as if they are responsible for her disappearance.''
In a tense hourlong hearing marked by confrontation and hyperbole, lawyers for the Kimeses described them in far different terms from those used by the prosecutors. Mr. Sachs said Kenneth Kimes was a high school honor student, a two-year hospice volunteer and a budding Internet Web page designer. Jose Muniz, Ms. Kimes's lawyer, described her as a retired housewife with arthritis and a Salvation Army volunteer whose central interest is turning her longtime hobby, writing children's books, into a career.
''We are in a situation where the Kimeses have been publicly condemned for a crime they did not commit,'' Mr. Sachs said, referring to Mrs. Silverman's disappearance.
But prosecutors angrily responded that the Kimeses should not be given bail because they would flee the country. An assistant district attorney, Carmen Morales, said Ms. Kimes had a criminal history dating to the 1960's and had used more than 20 aliases. Her son, she said, gave the police a false name when he was arrested and was carrying a knife and brass knuckles.
''Defense attorneys would like you to portray these two individuals as a choirboy and a housewife,'' Ms. Morales said. ''But that's not true.''
The hearing focused on whether the Kimeses should be allowed to post bail or be held behind bars before possible extradition to Utah. They were charged with telecommunications fraud in that state earlier this year for buying a 1997 Lincoln Town Car by phone and paying for it with a $15,000 bad check.
On Aug. 6, another court hearing will be held, at which a judge may order them jailed in New York for an additional 60 days. Not until early October will the Kimeses have to be either charged with committing a crime in New York or extradited.
Mr. Sachs opened yesterday's hearing by saying that the Kimeses were being unfairly denied bail because news reports, fueled by leaks from law enforcement officials, were wrongly blaming the Kimeses for Mrs. Silverman's disappearance.Continue reading the main story


text:
This salad adds color and sweet-tart flavor.
Makes 10 to 12 servings
+ Add To Shopping List
2 1/2 cups water
3 (3-ounce) packages black cherry-flavored gelatin
2 cups cola soft drink
1 (16-ounce) can whole-berry cranberry sauce
1 (15-ounce) can pitted Bing cherries, drained and quartered
2 cups chopped pecans, toasted
Prep: 15 Minutes
Cook: 5 Minutes
Chill: 8 Hours
Bring 2 1/2 cups water to a boil in a large saucepan over high heat; remove from heat. Add gelatin, stirring 2 minutes or until gelatin dissolves.
Stir cola, cranberry sauce, cherries, and chopped pecans into gelatin mixture; pour into a lightly greased 12-cup ring mold. Cover and chill 8 hours or until firm.
Unmold congealed salad onto a serving platter.
Note: For testing purposes only, we used Coca-Cola for cola soft drink.
Created date
February 2005


text:
Call (800) 720-6035
or email us at firstname.lastname@example.com today!
All products close
Welcom to BulkAmmo.com
By creating an account with our store, you will be able to move through the checkout process faster, store multiple shipping addresses, view and track your orders in your account and more.
If you have an account with us, please log in.
* Required Fields
© 2016 BulkAmmo.com


text:
From Intellogist
|If you found this page through a web search, we invite you to visit our Main Page to see what Intellogist is all about. This Community Report exists for our users to share information and experiences about patent search resources. Registered users can add, edit, or delete material on this page. The information contained on this page is the result of community collaboration and is not vetted by individual experts or fact-checkers. For in-depth reviews of other patent search resources, please read our Intellogist Reports. For information about editing Community reports, please see our Help pages. If you'd like more information about why Intellogist did not write about this search tool, please see our Criteria for Intellogist Articles.
PAIR (Patent Application Information Retrieval system) is a source for US patent application status checks. There are two sides to PAIR: public and private. Most patent searchers will only ever use the public database, which allows any user to check the status of an application (and sometimes view the entire file history for that application) with only a publication or application number. PAIR is the most timely source of US patent status information.
Online images of patent file wrappers are also available via PAIR for some applications. These are called Image File Wrappers, and they contain "an electronic version of a patent application, including image and/or text versions of the bibliographic information, all papers as filed, and all office actions and correspondence related to that application."
PAIR can be accessed at the PAIR portal.


text:
Annapara Homestay
Call us 1800-300-2400-1 (Toll Free) and Get additional Discount upto 50% for this Hotel.
Per Room Per Night
Lowest Price Guarantee
You are getting lowest possible rate for this hotel
Select Room
About Annapara Homestay
Featuring an outdoor swimming pool, Annapara Homestay is located at a distance of 9 km from the Kalpetta New Bus Stand. There are a total of 5 spacious rooms equipped with amenities that include bottled drinking water, wardrobe, night lamp, table and attached bathroom with toiletries and hot/cold water supply.
No of floors: 0 | No of rooms: 5
Checkin Time: 1200 pm
Checkout Time: 1000 pm
Hotel Information and Amenities
Read More....
Hotel Amenities
- Airport Transportation
- Laundry Facilities
- Parking
- Gardens
- Medical Services
- Swimming Pool
- Bottled Water In Room(complimentary)
- H/C Running Water
- "Bottle Opener
- Complimentary Toiletries
Hotel Location


text: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Brandan E. Lloyd < coloco-ubuntu at thelloyds.net> wrote: > +1 on the Treo. I have a 650 and I am super happy with it. Plus the new > Centro is much cheaper at around $99. > > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 22:01, TC <telecon at infosyndicate.net> wrote: > >> Treo/Palm is probably the best supported Smartphone for linux that I >> have come across. I've been using Palm/Linux for several years and have >> had very small issues. > > Really? Palm? I looked at some and I think they use windows mobile as the OS. I have a hard time buying anything with a widows based OS (HP has an interesting GPS but it's windows based and I can't get passed that). They are also expensive if you don't sign a contract and I won't. $400 or more for most but I did see a 650 for about $250. Maybe I can find a used one. So despite the windows OS these work with Linux, huh? Well, I just wish Google or whomever would get busy on an open phone. Thanks for the info. -- Jim (Ubuntu geek extraordinaire) ---- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-co/attachments/20080618/fa52a34b/attachment.htm


text:
Browse for words starting with moxies
No longer words starting with moxies found in this word list.
Back to moxie
Some random words: placabilities glabella phaeton ibex dab cruces aorist
This is not a dictionary, it's a word game wordfinder.
- Help and FAQ - Examples - Home
Privacy and Cookies Policy - Share - © Copyright 2004-2016 Morewords.com - 14.022mS


text:
Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (CSII) Upgraded at Zacks Investment Research
Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:CSII) was upgraded by Zacks Investment Research from a "hold" rating to a "buy" rating in a report issued on Tuesday. The brokerage presently has a $27.00 price objective on the medical device company's stock. Zacks Investment Research's target price indicates a potential upside of 13.66% from the company's previous close.
According to Zacks, "Cardiovascular Systems' fiscal fourth-quarter's reported loss was narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate. The top line also beat the mark. The company stands to gain from several favorable trends in the peripheral artery diseases as well coronary artery disease market spaces. Moreover, management is optimistic about the engineering enhancements and higher production volumes which may continue to reduce unit cost for the company in the quarters ahead. We are currently looking forward to the company's recent submission of Shonin application in Japan for approval of second-generation coronary device. Besides, the completion of a settlement agreement with the Department of Justice is an upside. On the flip side, the company operates in the competitive medical device industry, which gets significantly affected by new product introductions and other activities of industry participants."
A number of other research firms have also issued reports on CSII. Leerink Swann raised shares of Cardiovascular Systems from a "market perform" rating to an "outperform" rating and set a $30.00 price target for the company in a research report on Monday, August 22nd. Bank of America Corp. raised shares of Cardiovascular Systems from an "underperform" rating to a "neutral" rating in a research report on Thursday, August 4th. Finally, Needham & Company LLC raised their price objective on shares of Cardiovascular Systems from $23.00 to $27.00 and gave the company a "buy" rating in a research report on Thursday, August 4th. One analyst has rated the stock with a hold rating and eight have assigned a buy rating to the company. The stock currently has an average rating of "Buy" and an average price target of $24.14.
Cardiovascular Systems (NASDAQ:CSII) traded up 0.32% on Tuesday, reaching $23.83. 92,678 shares of the company's stock were exchanged. The firm has a 50 day moving average of $23.80 and a 200 day moving average of $18.22. The stock's market capitalization is $794.61 million. Cardiovascular Systems has a 12 month low of $7.50 and a 12 month high of $25.22.
Cardiovascular Systems (NASDAQ:CSII) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, August 3rd. The medical device company reported ($0.15) earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping analysts' consensus estimates of ($0.20) by $0.05. The business earned $48.50 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $46.01 million. Cardiovascular Systems had a negative net margin of 31.44% and a negative return on equity of 38.39%. The firm's revenue was up .0% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period in the prior year, the firm earned ($0.27) earnings per share. Equities analysts predict that Cardiovascular Systems will post ($0.62) earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
In other news, major shareholder Camber Capital Management Llc sold 1,100,000 shares of Cardiovascular Systems stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, September 20th. The shares were sold at an average price of $23.26, for a total value of $25,586,000.00. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is accessible through this link. Also, SVP Paul A. Koehn sold 5,969 shares of Cardiovascular Systems stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, September 7th. The shares were sold at an average price of $25.02, for a total transaction of $149,344.38. Following the completion of the transaction, the senior vice president now directly owns 73,321 shares in the company, valued at approximately $1,834,491.42. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. 5.60% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.
Several institutional investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in CSII. Cutler Group LP raised its position in Cardiovascular Systems by 4.7% in the second quarter. Cutler Group LP now owns 7,787 shares of the medical device company's stock worth $143,000 after buying an additional 350 shares in the last quarter. Strs Ohio bought a new stake in shares of Cardiovascular Systems during the second quarter valued at about $194,000. Menta Capital LLC increased its stake in shares of Cardiovascular Systems by 89.0% in the first quarter. Menta Capital LLC now owns 25,515 shares of the medical device company's stock valued at $265,000 after buying an additional 12,015 shares during the last quarter. Weiss Multi Strategy Advisers LLC increased its stake in shares of Cardiovascular Systems by 45.8% in the second quarter. Weiss Multi Strategy Advisers LLC now owns 14,580 shares of the medical device company's stock valued at $268,000 after buying an additional 4,580 shares during the last quarter. Finally, BlackRock Advisors LLC increased its stake in shares of Cardiovascular Systems by 3.3% in the second quarter. BlackRock Advisors LLC now owns 15,089 shares of the medical device company's stock valued at $277,000 after buying an additional 486 shares during the last quarter. 68.16% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.
About Cardiovascular Systems
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc is a medical technology company. The Company is engaged in treating patients suffering from peripheral and coronary arterial diseases. It has developed an orbital atherectomy technology for peripheral and coronary commercial applications. Its peripheral arterial disease systems are catheter-based platforms that treat plaque types in leg arteries both above and below the knee.
Receive News & Stock Ratings for Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Cardiovascular Systems Inc. and related stocks with our FREE daily email newsletter.


text:
Allergies and Tinnitus
Q: Recently, I have felt increased pressure in my ear, and I've received some tinnitus along with it. The nurse at my health center thinks that it is being caused by an allergic reaction, however, I am not exhibiting any other signs of allergies. She gave me some 60mg sudafed pills, and she expects it to clear up.
My question is, does it sound like she gave me the proper diagnosis. And if so, how long should it take the sudafed to relieve the pressure and tinnitus? I've taken three pills so far without any results. Any feedback would help!
A: This question is currently in queue and will be answered shortly by one of our doctors. In the meantime you may browse our library of answered questions by clicking here.
Related Q&A
Can a high carb/sugar diet cause dandruff and scalp infec...
Q: Hi I wanted to see if my symptoms might be caused by a food sensitivity. I have a dry itchy flaky scrap, itchy skin ...
Hello doctor I'm living in a very seasonal allergic pol...
Q: Hello doctor I'm living in a very seasonal allergic pollotion city. Last month, I started getting there infections...
I have been scheduled for a drug allergy challenge involving
Q: I have been scheduled for a drug allergy challenge involving acetaminophen. The center will not have a physician in ...
Hi There, I am an alcoholic I have been
Q: Hi There, I am an alcoholic. I have been drinking for years heavily (vodka) and then switched to wine to try to tamp...
I am very allergic to shrimp When a reaction starts
Q: I am very allergic to shrimp. When a reaction starts I have a severe headache and am nausated and throw up 6-8 hours
Dr. James Obaji M.D.
- 247 Reviews
- Family Physician
Dr. Suneel Sharman M.D.
- 190 Reviews
- Family Physician
Dr. Pat Golden M.D.
- 169 Reviews
- Cardiologist
Dr. Kunaal Jindal M.D.
- 112 Reviews
- Plastic Surgeon


text:
your bag
Your bag is empty.
Sorry, this product has sold out!
If you would like ARCHFASHION to try to and find it for you complete the form below.
The drawstring print with leather insert pants by natasha gan is sold out. We did have black/white / 8, black/white / 10, black/white / 12


text:
Man Run Over by Wife for Not Voting Against Obama May Be Permanently Disfigured
The Gilbert man run over by his wife this weekend -- as she allegedly blamed him for President Obama's re-election -- may have "permanent disfigurement" as a result, according to court documents obtained by New Times.
Daniel Solomon, who was in critical condition yesterday in the trauma center at Scottsdale Healthcare Osborn Medical Center, told police that his wife started arguing with him over his "lack of voter participation" last week, specifically in the presidential race.
See also:
-Holly Solomon Blames Husband for Obama's Re-Election, Rams Him With Her Car
"According to Daniel, Holly believed her family was going to face hardship as a result of President Obama's re-election," Gilbert police Sergeant Jesse Sanger said in an e-mail.
Upcoming Events
Phoenix Suns vs. New York Knicks
TicketsTue., Dec. 13, 7:00pm
Phoenix Suns vs. San Antonio Spurs
TicketsThu., Dec. 15, 7:00pm
Arizona Cardinals Game Zone - 12/18 - NOT A GAME TICKET
TicketsSun., Dec. 18, 10:50am
Phoenix Suns vs. Houston Rockets
TicketsWed., Dec. 21, 7:00pm
Witnesses told police that there was a lot of yelling before Holly Solomon hopped in her Jeep, and started chasing her husband around the parking lot. Her husband eventually tried to run away, but Solomon hit him, pinning him under the car and on a curb, according to police.
As we mentioned yesterday, had Daniel Solomon voted, and voted for Obama about 200,000 times, Mitt Romney still would've won Arizona's 11 electoral votes, so it's not clear where Holly Solomon got this idea that it was her husband's fault.
Also, there's a lot more "hardship" going on in her family right now, with her husband in the hospital, and Solomon's bond being set at $50,000 on two felony charges and one misdemeanor.
According to the court documents, Daniel Solomon's pelvis was fractured, and the arteries that feed his bowels were torn. Hospital staff also told police it's possible that Solomon will have "permanent disfiguration."
The charges against Holly Solomon -- reckless driving, disorderly conduct with a weapon, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon -- have been forwarded to the Maricopa County Attorney's Office.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in Phoenix, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.
In Case You Missed It
Upcoming Events
Phoenix Suns vs. Indiana Pacers
TicketsWed., Dec. 7, 7:00pm
Arizona Coyotes vs. Calgary Flames
TicketsThu., Dec. 8, 7:00pm
Arizona Coyotes vs. Nashville Predators
TicketsSat., Dec. 10, 6:00pm
Phoenix Suns vs. New Orleans Pelicans
TicketsSun., Dec. 11, 6:30pm
Sponsor Content


text:
Austentatious, 19 octobre 2016 19:00, Bishop's Palace & Gardens
Jane Austen as you have never seen her performed before. Austentatious are saddling the horses for a Grand Tour after four sell-out Edinburgh Fringe runs and three sell-out national tours, the award winning and critically acclaimed improvised comedy are pleased to come to The Wells Festival of Literature! Join the all-star cast as they improvise a brand new Jane Austen work before your very eyes, based on a single audience suggestion.
Previous lost masterpieces have included Sixth Sense & Sensibility, Double 0 Darcy and Mansfield Shark.
No two shows are ever the same! Performed in period costume with live musical accompaniment, Austentatious is a Regency treat. Hold on to your bonnets: this hilarious show is not to be missed. (Swooning guaranteed.)
★★★★★ joyously performed – The Times
★★★★ A joy to behold – The Guardian
A bravura slab of improvisation – Independent
Highly impressive – Time Out
* there will be 5-6 performers per show.
This event is kindly sponsored by Rock House Dental Practice


text:
RedPlannet Production is a recording studio in SW London, offering great quality recordings at very reasonable prices. Within walking distance from battersea park and Queens Town road train stations, easy parking in the area, next to Battersea Tesco's.
services offered:Recording, Mixing, Mastering, voice overs, DJ and studio gear, Music Tech Tutorials, plus Tea and sympathy


text:
Dragon Age II unboxing reveals Mass Effect 3 'Arrival' DLC
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Gamers who buy Dragon Age II will find a nice card in their box telling them "The ARRIVAL has begun", refering to the leaked Mass Effect 2 DLC that will bridge Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect 3 together.
This can only mean that 'Arrival' will have the Reapers coming to Earth and giving us a good whomping. Oh, that's "Reapers" to the Turian councilor. Maybe this will convince him they're real.
More at Strategy Informer


text:
You missed it This great deal for First State Vein & Laser Medi Spa is over. But don't despair, we've got more great deals every day.
Related Deals That You May Like
Mark P. Solomon, M.D, FACS
Chemical Peels, Facial Treatments + More
Wilmington / Newark$274$175
Radiance MedSpa
3 Laser Hair-Removal Treatments
Wilmington / Newark$450$224.99
SoulScapes Reiki Healing
1-Hour Rose Quartz Facial, or Laser Skin Tighting
Wilmington / Newark$85$42
Advanced Back & Neck Pain Center
1-Hour Massage + Chiropractic Consultation
Wilmington / Newark$100$39.99
First State Vein & Laser Medi Spa
Rejuvenate Your Look with Xeomin or Botox
- Save 50%
- 35 purchased
90% recommendedin LivingSocial customer ratings
Regain that glow with a trip to this med-spa in Wilmington, where you can find help enhancing or restoring your skin's smooth look:
• $148 ($296 value) for 20 units of Botox or Xeomin
• $296 ($592 value) for 40 units of Botox or Xeomin
• Inviting office conveniently offers weekday appointments until 7 p.m.
Target Tired Skin
You'll feel right at home at this welcoming center, where pale green walls and chic yet inviting décor will make you feel like you dropped by a friend's place -- a friend with just the thing to help rejuvenate a weary visage, that is. Both FDA-cleared injectables can temporarily reduce the appearance of moderate to severe lines between the brows, while Botox can address crow's feet -- clearing away years of worry to make your skin smoother and healthier looking.
PAID VALUE EXPIRES ON December 10, 2021
PROMOTIONAL VALUE EXPIRES ON September 10, 2014