text:
This property allows you to book online with a credit card. After submitting a reservation request, the owner or manager has 24 hours to accept, at which time your card will be charged and you will receive an email confirmation
4 BR 3.5+ BA Sleeps 12$406 avg/night3-7 night min stay
4 BR 3 BA Sleeps 10$513 avg/night2-7 night min stay
6 BR 3.5 BA Sleeps 16$544 avg/night3-7 night min stay
3 BR 2.5 BA Sleeps 10$239 avg/night2-4 night min stay
Great for Family Retreat#7173956 BR 6 BA Sleeps 24$1,500 avg/night2 night min stay
6 BR 2.5 BA Sleeps 15$710 avg/night2-5 night min stay
4 BR 2 BA Sleeps 16$329 avg/night2 night min stay
4 BR 2 BA Sleeps 12$181 avg/night2-7 night min stay
4 BR 2.5 BA Sleeps 12$198 avg/night1-3 night min stay
4 BR 2 BA Sleeps 12$159 avg/night2-5 night min stay
4 BR 2.5 BA Sleeps 10$290 avg/night2-4 night min stay
5 BR 3 BA Sleeps 14$280 avg/night2-6 night min stay
4 BR 3 BA Sleeps 12$249 avg/night2 night min stay
3 BR 2 BA Sleeps 10$157 avg/night2-3 night min stay
5 BR 2 BA Sleeps 12$286 avg/night2-5 night min stay
2 BR 2 BA Sleeps 10$249 avg/night2-4 night min stay
4 BR 3.5 BA Sleeps 14$335 avg/night2 night min stay
4 BR 3.5 BA Sleeps 10$540 avg/night2-4 night min stay
Recent Private Homes reviews
"Lots of space to entertain, hot tub was a big plus."Guest: Knock Date of Stay: November 2016 Review Submitted: November 9, 2016View listing
"Centrally located! We were 6 adults and had just the right amount of space at the house! If you are going in the summer-- just know that there is no A/C. Thankfully we were not in the house during the day (I assume it would be too hot!) and at night the windows cooled the place down! The kitchen was huge and allowed for multiple cooks! We would definitely stay here again!"Guest: Sheena P. Date of Stay: August 2016 Review Submitted: September 2, 2016View listing
"Our stay in this beautiful home was wonderful! It met all our expectations: plenty of room to fit our group of 14, easy access to lake/casino, and great hospitality from the host. The pictures really do not do this home justice. We were able to fit 3 compact cars in the garage. The bedrooms were spacious and using the poker table was good time. Diptish was a great host by answering all questions/concerns in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend staying in this home."Guest: Jennifer G. Date of Stay: August 2016 Review Submitted: September 2, 2016View listing
"The house was clean, comfortable and well maintained. The yard was well kept, my 14 month old granddaughter loved running around. The owner responded to questions very promptly. The neighborhood is quiet and very easy to get to. I would stay again and recommend the home for any family gathering. The only issues were that the clothes dryer did not work well (we notified the owner - I'm positive that it will be fixed for future tenants). This caused a problem trying to get out of the house by the check-out time. I agree with one of the other reviews that stated the mattresses were not that comfortable."Guest: Terrel L. Date of Stay: September 2016 Review Submitted: September 27, 2016View listing
Featured Destinations: Lake Almanor, Orlando Vacation Rentals, Big Bear Cabin Rentals, Anna Maria Island Rentals


text:
Manager Charged With Bilking Itasca Company Of More Than $1MMcHenry resident Abel Aguirre, 45, faces four felony theft charges and six felony forgery charges involving his former employer, Itasca-based Fellowes, according to the DuPage County state's attorney's office.
Thieves Steal Packages From UPS And FedEx Trucks On South SideWith the holiday shopping season underway, thieves have been targeting delivery trucks filled with packages.
Former Bellwood Official Gets Probation For Stealing From VillageRoy McCampbell, who pleaded guilty to misdemeanor theft before Cook County Judge Timothy James Joyce, also was ordered to pay $100,000 in restitution, according to court records.
8 Chicagoans Charged With Theft After Downstate Police ChaseEight Chicago residents have been charged with theft following a Saturday morning heist in St. Louis, Missouri, and a subsequent police chase that lasted nearly an hour and wound through several downstate Illinois cities.
Women Charged With Stealing Packages At Wheaton Apartment ComplexShannon K. Madera and Erin L. Fessler, both 41, were arrested Nov. 8 in connection with multiple packages reported missing from a secured mail area of the Wheaton Center apartment complex in the 0-100 block of Wheaton Center, according to a statement from Wheaton police.
Police Arrest 7 In Illinois After Alleged St. Louis TheftAuthorities say seven people have been arrested in central Illinois after an alleged theft at a St. Louis mall and an interstate car chase.
Attorneys For Aaron Schock Ask Judge To Postpone ArraignmentIn a request made Tuesday to U.S. District Judge Sue E. Myerscough, Schock's lawyers say a Nov. 21 arraignment will interfere with a planned international business trip by the Peoria Republican.
Grand Jury Indicts Aaron Schock On Wire Fraud, Theft CountsThe Illinois congressman who resigned amid scrutiny of lavish spending -- including remodeling his Capitol Hill office in the style of the television series "Downton Abbey" -- expects to be indicted by a federal grand jury, his defense team said Thursday.
Serial Car Thieves Strike Auto Dealerships On Chicago's NW SideSoon after one of the thefts, a dealership started receiving taunting phone calls. CBS 2's Suzanne Le Mignot reports.
Police Investigating String Of MetroPCS RobberiesDetectives are looking into whether Cedric Wright and a juvenile, are connected to several MetroPCS store robberies.
Former LaGrange Police Officer Accused Of Stealing From Senior CitizenBack in 2004, LaGrange Police officer Steven Kenifel talked with CBS 2 Chicago about a theft, and now he's on the wrong end of theft allegations.
Man Held 4 Months On Theft Charge Dies In Custody"Unfortunately, Mr. Hanley's death is another shameful reminder of how disgracefully unjust our bond system is," said Cara Smith, chief policy officer for the Cook County sheriff's office.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Operations are suspended at UW Bothell and Cascadia effective 7 p.m. for the remainder of Thursday evening. Classes and evening activities are cancelled and the library is closed.
March 19. 2015 - In early March, IAS alumnus T. Andrew Wahl (Comparative U.S. and International Studies, '96) met with undergraduate students to share his career journey and advice as part of IAS's "Mentor Chat" series. Mentor Chats assist students with career exploration and networking by providing opportunities to dialogue with IAS alums and community partners working across diverse roles and sectors. In a relaxed environment, Wahl discussed his various roles as a communications director, writer, editor, designer and editorial cartoonist. He currently heads Everett Community College's journalism department and is a member of the 2015-16 Humanities Washington Speakers Bureau, for which he delivers talks about comic books and U.S. history.
Forty-eight percent of UW Bothell's first year students are the first in their families to attend college.
© University of Washington Bothell Privacy | Terms


text:
JP's Indycar Blog
Photo Galleries
About the Bloggers
Thursday, June 7, 2012
The Speedgeek Speaketh...
One of the three regular readers and a frequent commenter to this blog - The Speedgeek has emerged from his blogging hiatus to share profound thoughts worthy of serious consideration. Read his opine
Posted by
Email This
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Blog List
A Memory For A Lifetime
4 hours ago
15 Days in May
A Tale of Three Tracks
9 hours ago
No Fenders - Formula 1 and Indy Car Racing Blog
Nico Rosberg walks Away from Formula 1
2 days ago
Open Paddock
Op-Ed: Media Done Right at Rally of the Tall Pines
4 days ago
The F1 and Motorsports Archive
"Costing a Season of European Formula 3"
1 week ago
16th And Georgetown
Foyt Sign Munoz & Daly
2 weeks ago
Defender of the IRL Weblog
Donald Trump and the Indianapolis 500
3 weeks ago
Indy Racing Revolution
Big Deal: Save $25 on ALL Ticket Network Orders
5 months ago
...and he's on it
Quiet Execution Speaks Volumes
6 months ago
New Track Record
2016 Indy 500 Turn 3 Diary
6 months ago
Unfiltered Race Notes… The Gorgeous Facility Edition
7 months ago
So... here's what I'm thinking...
I miss my friend…
7 months ago
Remembering Justin Wilson by Being a Fan: It's Never Too Soon
1 year ago
Happy Festivus … and Goodbye
1 year ago
More Front Wing
A farewell to More Front Wing
2 years ago
THIS JUST IN… I have a face for radio
2 years ago
IndyCar Advocate
Shutting Down
2 years ago
Pop Off Valve
End of a season
4 years ago
is it May yet?
Thank you, Will Power
5 years ago
Up in the Marbles
Tweaking the Restart Procedure: A Middle Ground
5 years ago
The SpeedGeek's MotorSports Blog
Now Available in a Grab Bag!
5 years ago
The Other Side
2011 Silly Season Update
5 years ago
My Name Is IRL
Hello, I Must Be Going
5 years ago
The Indy Idea
Time to Kill the Brickyard 400?
6 years ago
Ask the Expert blog: IndyCar Series
Everyone's Blog Posts - FastasticNetwork.com
Drive Hard, Turn Left
One Lap Down


text:
Join the conversation...
Making the Most of Your LMS PPT
Remember Me
Forgot your password?
Need to create an account?
11/19/20152016 LEX Scholarship
10/1/2015AAfPE 2015 Board of Directors Election
10/18/2017 » 10/21/2017AAfPE 36th Annual Conference
10/31/2018 » 11/3/2018AAfPE 37th Annual Conference
©2016 American Association for Paralegal Education (AAfPE)
All rights reserved.


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
April 26, 2010
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.R.E.B., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cape May County, Indictment No. 02-02-00140.
Submitted February 24, 2010
Before Judges Graves, J. N. Harris and Newman.
On a retrial following a reversal by this court, State v. R.E.B., 385 N.J. Super. 72 (App. Div. 2006), the jury found defendant R.E.B. guilty of first-degree aggravated sexual assault of his biological daughter, J.B., and second-degree endangering her welfare. The trial court sentenced defendant to a ten-year prison term on the sexual assault charge and a consecutive five-year term on the endangering conviction. Defendant appeals. We affirm the conviction and sentence.
The relevant facts developed at trial may be summarized as follows. J.B. was born in 1985 to M.O., her mother, and defendant. In 1987, R.B., J.B.'s younger brother, was born to M.O. and defendant. M.O. and defendant separated in 1990 and later divorced. After the separation, J.B. regularly visited the home of defendant, her paternal grandmother, K.S., her paternal step-grandfather, B.B., and her step-great-aunt, L.B. Defendant later married L.B., who was B.B.'s sister and defendant's step-aunt through his mother's marriage to B.B.
On November 30, 1993, B.B. was arrested for sexually assaulting J.B., pled guilty, and served a five-year sentence at the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center in Avenel, New Jersey. Following B.B.'s guilty plea to the charge of sexually assaulting defendant's daughter, defendant continued to live with B.B. Because defendant continued to associate with B.B. after he pled guilty to the sexual assault of J.B., M.O. prohibited J.B. from visiting defendant.
J.B. resumed visiting defendant at his new residence shortly after B.B. was incarcerated. M.O. would take J.B. to visit defendant for the weekend. J.B. typically spent Friday through Sunday with her father. J.B. testified defendant began having sex with her when she was "eight, nine, ten, maybe older" until she was "[b]etween thirteen and fifteen." She later testified the sexual assaults stopped occurring approximately in 1999 or 2000.
J.B. claimed defendant had sexual intercourse with her multiple times, generally when they were alone in defendant's new home together, although she could not remember how many times it happened. Defendant told J.B. not to tell anyone about their encounters, and gave her money, alcohol, cigarettes, and candy in an attempt to keep others from learning about the abuse.
Unlike the first trial, J.B. recalled three specific instances where her father sexually assaulted her, although she could not recall the dates or their chronological order.
One of the instances was when J.B. was in her room with no one else in the house. She was not wearing underwear nor pants. According to her, defendant "penetrated me and he got off on my stomach," after which he got a towel and "wiped it off" before leaving the room. She was on her back on the bottom bunk with her legs on the floor and her father was between her legs.
A second occurrence took place in defendant's bedroom which he shared with L.B. On that occasion, defendant was laying on his back on the waterbed and she was on top and "riding him" with his penis inside her. She did not recall if he ejaculated.
She described a third occasion involving a similar type of assault while she was lying on her back as the bunk beds were separated. Defendant ejaculated on her stomach, and she subsequently cleaned it off with a towel.
J.B. stated that the instances would last "until he got off." Once her father finished doing what he was doing, he "went about his day."
Before J.B. stopped visiting her father, she decreased the amount of time she would be alone at his residence. She asked one of her cousins to accompany her for the weekend in order to avoid being alone with him. She began working at Burger King which affected the amount of time she had to spend in his company. She did not tell anyone because she did not want to put her mother and brother through the same experience they had been through before involving B.B.
J.B.'s cousin, H.O., testified that on January 18, 2002, J.B. told H.O. about defendant's sexual assaults against her.
At that time, H.O. and J.B. were living and working together, shared a room, and had a "very close" relationship. When revealing her father's sexual assaults, J.B. became "really upset" and "kind of shut down," then "curled up into a ball . . . . she was just crying and crying . . . . [H.O.] just kept asking her what happened . . . she wouldn't say anything more than that." H.O. claimed J.B. "said that she had never told anybody" and "wanted [H.O.] to keep it a secret." However, H.O. testified that she repeated to M.O. what J.B. had told her and later the police came to investigate.
H.O. testified J.B. was "very upset" and "a little bit" angry with her for failing to keep J.B.'s secret, but "forgave" H.O. and "understood why [H.O.] did it." J.B. testified she made H.O. promise not to tell anyone, and now wished she had never trusted H.O. with the information. J.B. also testified she was afraid for her mother's health after learning about the sexual assaults and that the news would destroy her family.
J.B. claimed her father's sexual abuse "was something [she] had every intention of going to the grave with. Nobody would have ever known."
After H.O. revealed to M.O. what J.B. had told her, M.O. confronted J.B., and J.B. admitted defendant had sexually assaulted her. M.O. testified that J.B. was "frantic," "devastated," and "didn't want anybody to ever know. She didn't want her father to be in trouble. She didn't want me to be upset. She had the weight of the world on her." In response to hearing that defendant had sexually assaulted their daughter, M.O. "started shaking uncontrollably and couldn't breathe and passed out on the floor." J.B.'s maternal grandmother called an ambulance, which soon arrived along with the police. J.B. provided a statement to the Lower Township Police the same day, January 19, 2002, indicating that defendant had repeatedly sexually assaulted her. J.B. was sixteen years old at that time.
On January 25, 2002, the Lower Township Police arrested defendant and transported him to police headquarters, where he signed a waiver of rights form and provided a ninety-minute statement during which he was questioned by two detectives. The detectives' interrogation tactics included providing false information to defendant that J.B. had passed a polygraph test as to her allegations and that she was suicidal and might harm herself if defendant did not confess.
While speaking with Detective Keywood of the Lower Township Police Department, defendant stated, "If it happened it must have been while I was drunk or something otherwise I don't remember. I really wish I could." In response to a detective's direct question regarding J.B.'s accusation, defendant answered, "Probably when I was drunk, if it did happen." Although defendant claimed, "Honestly inside . . . . No, I don't think nothing happened[,]" when the detectives stated, "so we're not doubting that your daughter is telling the truth here," defendant responded, "No, I'm not doubting my daughter."
Defendant later stated, "If it gets figured out and I do realize yeah I did touch my daughter, it's just, I don't know how I'm going to deal with it. How's she going to deal with it . . . . She'll probably never speak to me again." He also told Detective Keywood he could not think of any reason that J.B. would falsely accuse him of sexual assault, and claimed he would "get some counseling . . . . to get to the bottom of this."
M.O. and J.B. subsequently contacted defendant and spoke with him together by telephone. M.O. and J.B. confronted defendant with J.B.'s allegations. Defendant initially denied ever having done anything sexual with J.B., but during the conversation, he asked J.B. if he was drunk when the sexual assaults occurred.
At trial, defendant denied that he ever sexually assaulted J.B., but acknowledged that when he provided a statement to the Lower Township Police, he believed he had done something sexually inappropriate with J.B. and he apologized to J.B. for that reason. Defendant testified his written statement accurately reflected the information he had provided to the police, but claimed he only stated it was possible the sexual assaults occurred "before [he] knew the severity of the charges."
Following defendant's arrest, J.B.'s paternal grandmother, K.S., and paternal aunt, S.B., allegedly pressured J.B. and her younger brother, R.B., to conceal defendant's sexual assaults against J.B. R.B. testified that his family asked him whether he had seen anything suspicious happening between defendant and J.B., and he "lied" because he "felt pressured" and did not want to "have to deal with animosity" from his father's side of the family.
At trial, R.B. testified to an incident he witnessed when he was about ten years old, in which he observed his sister "standing crying" and naked in the bathroom while her father was also in the bathroom. He claimed he heard his father's voice, and "didn't think anything of it" at the moment, but acknowledged that he later became "suspicious of what [he] saw" once he grew older.
Defendant's family members also pressured J.B. to retract her allegations against defendant. K.S. and S.B. scheduled an appointment for J.B. with Dr. William Hankin, a psychiatrist, and purportedly coerced J.B. into telling Dr. Hankin defendant was innocent and she had lied about the sexual assaults. J.B. testified her statement to Dr. Hankin that defendant never sexually abused her was a lie that she told in an attempt to gain acceptance from her family and protect her father.
Based on his interactions with J.B. and her aunt, S.B., during their meeting, Dr. Hankin subsequently wrote a letter to defendant's first trial attorney indicating that J.B. had formally recanted her allegations against her father and was now claiming defendant was innocent. Dr. Hankin testified he showed J.B. a copy of that letter on March 30, 2004, and she approved its contents.
Pursuant to the remand from this court, defendant sought to introduce evidence challenging the victim witness's credibility by introducing (1) evidence that J.B. made a prior false criminal accusation, and (2) evidence of J.B.'s virginity and lack of sexual knowledge after the onset of the alleged abuse. R.E.B., supra, 385 N.J. Super. at 82, 86. The trial court held a N.J.R.E. 104 hearing prior to the retrial to address these issues and ruled the testimony inadmissible. These arguments will be discussed in connection with defendant's Points I and II infra.
On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration:
We address the arguments in the order raised in defendant's brief.
Defendant contends in Point I that the trial court erred by ruling inadmissible the evidence that J.B. allegedly lied about having accused a former co-worker of sexual harassment and/or assault sometime in 1999 or 2000. In our remand, we directed that the trial court conduct a N.J.R.E. 104 hearing "to determine whether the false statement was made and if so whether it would be admissible . . . ." R.E.B., supra, 385 N.J. Super. at 86. We further ordered that the trial judge apply the factors in State v. Guenther, 181 N.J. 129 (2004), in deciding whether a specific instance of conduct, such as the prior false accusation alleged here, could be employed to challenge J.B.'s credibility. R.E.B., supra, 385 N.J. Super. at 86. Following a N.J.R.E. 104 hearing to determine whether the false statement was made and, if so, whether it was admissible to impeach J.B.'s character for truthfulness, the court concluded that defendant failed to satisfy the threshold showing required by Guenther, supra.
In determining whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to present evidence of an alleged false accusation made by J.B., the factors set forth by the Supreme Court in Guenther, supra, 181 N.J. at 157, must be considered. The first factor is "whether the credibility of the victim- witness is the central issue in the case." Ibid. J.B.'s testimony was essentially the only evidence against defendant; there was no physical evidence of the sexual assaults or eyewitnesses. The first factor was satisfied.
The second factor involves "the similarity of the prior false criminal accusation to the crime charged." Ibid. The conduct that J.B. purportedly attributed to one of her former co-workers was considerably less severe and dissimilar to her allegations of sexual assault against defendant. Whereas J.B.'s grandmother, K.S., claimed J.B. previously accused a co-worker of sexually harassing her and touching her inappropriately, J.B.'s father statutorily raped her on multiple occasions over a number of years. The second Guenther factor weighs against admissibility of J.B.'s alleged false accusation.
The third factor requires consideration of "the proximity of the prior false accusation to the allegation that is the basis of the crime charged." Ibid. According to K.S., when J.B. was fourteen or fifteen, J.B. lied about sexual harassment by a former co-worker at Burger King, and about having filed a harassment complaint based on that incident. K.S. could not recall when J.B. made this false statement to K.S., testifying, "it had been in the spring, I think . . . . Oh, let me see . . . . It had to be in '96, something like that, or '95. I can't be -- you know."
K.S. also testified that J.B. never provided the name of the person who harassed her at her workplace. K.S. could not remember the year in which J.B. allegedly lied to her about the sexual harassment incident at work, nor could she provide the name of any other person who could confirm that J.B. had ever made such a false statement. However, K.S. testified that J.B. lied about the harassment by a co-worker when she was either fourteen or fifteen, which would have been in either 1999 or 2000. J.B. first accused her father of sexually assaulting her in January 2002, when she was sixteen. This two-to-three-year time differential is not in close proximity to her accusation against defendant. Under these circumstances, the third factor of the test militated against admissibility.
Fourth, consideration must be given to "the number of witnesses, the items of extrinsic evidence, and the amount of time required for presentation of the issue at trial." Ibid. Here, there was only one witness, K.S., who testified that J.B. had previously made a false criminal accusation. While testimony from only one witness would not likely have required an extended period of time at trial, the trial court likely determined that the lack of additional corroboration beyond K.S.'s testimony demonstrated that the evidence may have been unreliable. When questioned on cross-examination, K.S. struggled to provide a specific date, month, or even a year in which J.B. allegedly made a false accusation against a nameless co-worker at Burger King.
Additionally, there was no extrinsic evidence that J.B. had actually made the false allegation; in fact, she completely denied ever having made the alleged statement to K.S. The Public Defender investigator found no record of a harassment complaint against a co-worker filed by J.B. at the Burger King restaurant where she worked at the time. Accordingly, the fourth factor supports the trial court's decision to deny defendant's motion to admit evidence of J.B.'s alleged false accusation against a former co-worker.
Lastly, the fifth factor to be considered for the admissibility of a prior false criminal accusation is "whether the probative value of the false accusation evidence will be outweighed by undue prejudice, confusion of the issues, and waste of time." Ibid. This factor weighed in favor of the trial court's decision to deny admission of J.B.'s prior false accusation. The trial court reasonably found that allowing the jury to hear evidence of a false criminal allegation that J.B. made against a former co-worker would lead to a confusion of the issues and waste the court's time and resources.
We are satisfied that the trial court's denial of defendant's attempt to introduce evidence of J.B.'s alleged prior false allegation of sexual assault or harassment was correct and complied with the standards set forth in State v. Guenther.
In Point II, defendant argues the trial court erred by denying under the Rape Shield Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:14-7, the proffered testimony regarding J.B.'s alleged disclosure to her paternal aunt, S.B., that she had recently had her first sexual experience. According to defendant, the court misinterpreted the statute and that misapplication of the law led to reversible error.
On our remand, we made it clear that "the evidence that the victim claimed to be a virgin after the alleged attacks by her father began in 1998 does not implicate the Rape Shield Law, because it is not evidence of prior sexual conduct but is evidence of the lack of any prior sexual conduct." R.E.B., supra, 385 N.J. Super. at 87-88. We recognized that the alleged disclosure to J.B.'s aunt was probative of her credibility because it contradicted J.B.'s testimony of when the charge she had been raped commenced in 1998. Id. at 88. We left it to the trial judge to determine "its precise nature and whether the probative value of the evidence would be substantially outweighed by any countervailing factors." Ibid.
In addressing this issue following an evidentiary hearing and recognizing that the Rape Shield Law was not implicated, the trial court summarized S.B.'s proffered testimony as follows: ". . . at some point in 2000 she had a conversation with [J.B.,] at [J.B.'s] request[,] and [J.B.] revealed that she had been a virgin up to a point, not capable of ascertainment or even generality beyond the year and not even the year, prior to that conversation." The court continued by stating that it was "left wondering how any reasonable jury could without more find that
[a] sanitized version could possibly establish chastity on the part of [J.B.] subsequent to the time of the alleged events or offenses here."
Based on the above factfinding, the trial court concluded that "submission of even the most sanitized version [of S.B.'s testimony] to the jury would be unduly prejudicial to the [S]tate, would be confusing necessarily [sic] to the jury and also would be invasive of the victim's privacy." Accordingly, the trial court, which expressed substantial misgivings with S.B.'s testimony, was unable to reach the requisite determination that S.B.'s proffered testimony was both highly material and had such significant probative value so as to "outweigh[] its collateral nature or the probability that its admission will create undue prejudice, confusion of the issues, or unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the victim." State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 166 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1160, 124 S.Ct. 1169, 157 L.Ed. 2d 1204 (2004) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:14-7(a)).
Under our standard of review of an abuse of discretion, we are persuaded that the trial court's discretion was properly exercised. We find no error in denying admission of S.B.'s testimony regarding J.B.'s purported initial sexual activity with someone other than defendant subsequent to when defendant began to rape her.
In Point III, defendant argues the prosecutor's improper comments during summation deprived him of his right to a fair trial. The prosecutor's specific remarks that defendant asserts violated his right to a fair trial include the following: the prosecutor "impermissibly vouched for the credibility of J.B."; "improperly commented upon the conduct of trial [defense] counsel upon receiving the alleged recantation"; "improperly equated the jurors' oath with a conviction"; and referred "to the defendant's 'street education' [which] implied prior criminality on his behalf."
Regarding defendant's claim that the prosecutor vouched for J.B.'s credibility in his closing statement to the jury, the comments merely attempted to demonstrate that J.B. had no reason to lie about her father sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions, and reminded the jury that J.B. testified she remembered specific incidents of her father's sexual abuse very clearly. The prosecutor also argued that because J.B. and defendant could not both be telling the truth, the jury could draw an inference based on J.B.'s "crystal clear" testimony and find that J.B. was more credible than defendant, who acknowledged that even he could not think of a reason for J.B. to fabricate her allegations against him. To be sure, a prosecutor should not personally vouch for a witness's credibility. However, the prosecutor did not do so. The comments were fair inferences from the facts and remained within the appropriate range of prosecutorial advocacy. State v. Perry, 65 N.J. 45, 48 (1974).
Defendant contends the prosecutor in his summation improperly referred to "the conduct of trial [defense] counsel when he received information J.B. had allegedly recanted." This reference was to the trial attorney who represented defendant at the first trial. The prosecutor claimed that "[d]eep down," defendant's trial attorney "didn't think [J.B.] was going to" actually recant her allegations against her father, and therefore the letter from Dr. Hankin stating that J.B. was recanting was "worthless."
While a prosecutor's unfair attack on defense counsel may support reversal, State v. Sherman, 230 N.J. Super. 10, 15-19 (App. Div. 1988), that is not what occurred here. The prosecutor attempted to cast doubt on J.B.'s recantation and to explain the inconsistency between the letter from Dr. Hankin and J.B.'s trial testimony at the retrial. The prosecutor never attacked defense counsel's trial strategy or decisions and only made a brief and somewhat ambiguous reference to the letter in arguing that J.B.'s recantation should be disregarded because it was coerced by her family members. The prosecutor's vague references to defense counsel's reaction to J.B.'s recantation did not constitute an unfair attack.
Next, defendant argues that the prosecutor "improperly equated the jurors' oath with a conviction." The prosecutor concluded his summation on the following note:
But you can show everyone here that you take your oath seriously, that you believe J.B. You can demonstrate your sense of justice by coming back and showing her that you believe the Defendant sexually penetrated his daughter. You can redeem that one fact and I ask that you uphold your oath and you do that by finding that man guilty of these awful crimes.
Shortly after the prosecutor's remarks and at the very beginning of the court's instructions to the jury, the trial judge made reference to the juror's oath:
In that regard, the Prosecutor in his Closing Comments to you invoked your oath as jurors and the result that he believes the evidence suggests. To the extent that my instructions are inconsistent with anything that either he said in that regard or any other regard or that defense Counsel said in any other regard, you are to disregard those arguments.
Contrary to defendant's assertion, the prosecutor did not equate a guilty verdict with the oath the jury took to uphold the law. Notwithstanding, the trial judge gave the jury a curative instruction, advising them to disregard the prosecutor's specific reference to their oath as jurors. The trial judge's prompt reaction to the prosecutor's comment dispelled any potential prejudice to defendant. We do not consider that his right to a fair trial has been abridged.
Defendant next asserts that the prosecutor's brief reference to defendant's "street education" somehow attributed prior criminal activity to defendant. The reference made no specific implication that defendant had ever committed a crime in the past besides the charges for which he was on trial. The prosecutor's comment was an effort to refute defendant's contention that the police had misled him or tricked him into providing a statement. The intent of the remarks were intended to show that the police did not manipulate defendant because although he had little formal education, he nevertheless understood the charges against him due to, as he himself testified, his informal "street education." Defendant reads far more into the "street education" reference than the trial context contains. We discern no error in the prosecutor's reference.
Following defendant's first trial, the trial judge sentenced defendant to a ten-year prison term with a concurrent five-year term of imprisonment. After the second trial, a different trial judge imposed the same terms of imprisonment, but made them run consecutively. Defendant argues that under North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L. Ed 2d 656 (1969), the court was prohibited from increasing his sentence because it would be unconstitutionally penalizing defendant for exercising his right to appeal. Defendant also contends that there was no new objective information concerning identifiable conduct occurring since the first sentencing to justify an increase in the sentence.
As the court in North Carolina v. Pearce held, a sentencing judge is not constitutionally precluded . . . from imposing a new sentence, whether greater or less than the original sentence, in the light of events subsequent to the first trial that may have thrown new light upon the defendant's "life, health, habits, conduct, and mental and moral propensities." Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241, 245, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 1082, 93 L.Ed. 1337, 1341 (1949). Such information may come to the judge's attention from evidence adduced at the second trial itself, from a new presentence investigation, from the defendant's prison record, or possibly from other sources. The freedom of a sentencing judge to consider the defendant's conduct subsequent to the first conviction in imposing a new sentence is no more consonant with the principle, fully approved in Williams v. New York, supra, that a State may adopt the "prevalent modern philosophy of penology that the punishment should fit the offender and not merely the crime." Id. at 247, 69 S.Ct. at 1083, 93 L.Ed. at 1342. [State v. Pindale, 279 N.J. Super. 123, 129 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 142 N.J. 449 (1995) (quoting Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. at 723-24, 89 S.Ct. at 2080-81, 23 L.Ed. 2d 656, 668).]
Due process "'requires that vindictiveness against a defendant for having successfully attacked his first conviction must play no part in the sentence he receives after a new trial . . . . [and] that a defendant be freed of apprehension of such a retaliatory motivation[.]'" Ibid. (quoting Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. at 725, 89 S.Ct. at 2080, 23 L.Ed. 2d at 669).
Consequently, "whenever a judge imposes a more severe sentence . . . after a new trial," he or she must provide reasons for doing so, which "must be based upon objective information concerning identifiable conduct on the part of the defendant occurring after the time of the original sentencing proceeding." Ibid. (quoting Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. at 726, 89 S.Ct. at 2081, 23 L.Ed. 2d at 670). Therefore, "if the original sentence is increased, the sentencing authority must affirmatively identify the relevant conduct or events that occurred after the original sentencing proceeding in order to overcome any presumption of vindictiveness." State v. Rodriguez, 97 N.J. 263, 276 (1984). Where, as here, the judge who sentenced defendant after the second trial is not the same judge who sentenced him following the first trial, any presumption of vindictiveness is virtually eliminated. See Texas v. McCullough, 475 U.S. 134, 139, 106 S.Ct. 976, 979, 89 L.Ed. 2d 104, 108 (1986) ("'[Unlike] the judge who has been reversed,' the trial judge here had 'no motivation to engage in self-vindication.'") (quoting Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17, 27, 93 S.Ct. 1977, 1983, 36 L.Ed. 2d 714, 724 (1973)).
In Pindale, supra, 279 N.J. Super. at 129, this court remanded for resentencing because "the judge gave no reasons for imposing a greater sentence than after the first trial." Id. at 128. As we put it: "We might have no difficulty sustaining the sentence imposed but for the fact that the specific term exceeded the sentence imposed after defendant's first trial." Ibid.
In this case, the trial court addressed and ultimately rejected defendant's argument at sentencing, stating, "On this record alone, were this [c]court to impose an initial sentence and not have the obligation to consider the holding in Pindale[,] [t]he starting point of this [c]court would be the midterm on each of these counts, 15 years on Count I, 7 1/2 years on Count II." The court noted that an appropriate total sentence could exceed twenty-two years if the mid-range terms of imprisonment on each count were applied and the terms were to run consecutively.
The trial judge determined that Pindale did not preclude a greater total term of imprisonment from the sentence defendant received after his first trial because there were several examples of "relevant conduct or events that occurred after the original sentencing proceeding" that negated "any presumption of vindictiveness." State v. Rodriguez, 97 N.J. 263, 276 (1984).
The judge stated that certain relevant events had occurred following defendant's first sentencing proceeding that justified a greater sentence, including: defendant's buying alcohol, cigarettes and candy for J.B. to encourage her to keep quiet about the sexual assaults; at trial, J.B. testified as to at least three specific incidents of sexual abuse against her by defendant; J.B.'s cousin H.O.'s testimony regarding J.B.'s disclosure of defendant's repeated sexual assaults against J.B.; defendant's failure to ever fully and consistently deny that he had committed sexual assault against his daughter J.B.; and finally, Dr. Hankin's testimony regarding J.B.'s thoughts of hurting herself as a result of her depression and confusion, and her specified reason for seeing Dr. Hankin was that "she felt sorry" for defendant and "wanted her brother [R.B.] to know her father" as well. Under North Carolina v. Pearce, supra, 395 U.S. at 723, 89 S.Ct. at 2079, 23 L.Ed. 2d at 668, "evidence adduced at the second trial itself" could be the source of new information to justify an increase in sentence. As the trial court properly determined, there were several examples of new information or new developments that had not been introduced or considered at defendant's first trial, but which were brought out at the retrial, which reasonably justified the increase in the sentence imposed on remand.
Moreover, the judge who imposed defendant's greater sentence on remand was not the same judge who originally sentenced defendant after his first trial. No presumption that a different trial judge would have any inclination toward vindictiveness nor any motive to unduly or excessively punish defendant in determining an appropriate sentence because he was not the judge who was reversed on appeal. There was no error in imposing consecutive sentences under the circumstances.
The judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text: Welcome to CLARK Security Products We are a leading wholesale distributor of security products: door hardware, key systems, CCTV, and electronic access control caramel presents thousands caramel pretty fucking 6 movies/pics ; honey brains 5 watch milf videos in high quality free. Perverted wifes, sexy moms, busty MILFs young boys girls seduced by expirienced mature woman ! Ebony Porn Mix - your source best black ebony porn videos with famous pornstars amateur girls hottest most recent videos. Milf Post gives the daily updated free milf movies are curious know what is? then at right place time, as see most. have lots quality mom sex tube hot milfs perfect bodies, tits below the mature porn, granny old lady xxx tube please enjoy! high definition adult with over 1300 pornstars, & amateurs, filmed exclusively brazzers. Get FREE taste that sweet brown sugar RedTube s EBONY porn com – world's pornsite! we want suggest spending is certainly very contains tons material which easily go crazy lust. These 18+ year old can t get enough hard cock ebonyclipss. Chocolate pounded on Black Tubes! If you haven't got any idea about how relax but looking forward spend time fascinating xxx com filled babes, chicks interracial indexed ranked porn, so just click favorite enjoy! free, pornhub. like kind will find here make love chocolate com. Discover these babes porno they star in sort movies most relevant catch full length now! sex movies. Free Download or stream hardcore xxx scenes for DansMovies! Check out our massive pornstar database, daily best video archive web! Caramel presents thousands caramel Pretty fucking 6 movies/pics ; honey brains 5 Watch MILF Videos in High Quality Free


text:
Women's Natural ® Aurelyn Booties
From UGG®, the Aurelyn booties feature: 17mm Twinface upper. Nylon binding. Rear pull tab. Seasonal metal UGG® logo plate. Nylon or leather strap with functional metal buckle. 17mm UGGpureTM sockliner (bleached and dyed lamb fur (Australia, UK, US, or Ireland)) that naturally wicks away moisture. Lightweight and flexible molded EVA outsole with patent-protected tread design. 5.25" shaft height. D/M/S: 0657 766 1011252. Color: natural


text:
Young boys gay xxx tubes and free nude skater boys movieture
Emo young boys nude and men sex gay emo asian A Skater Boys
Bareback Skater Boys
Seeding skater boys: threesome
Three horny Asian boys decided to get naughty and starts undressing After a while, two boys decided they should bareback fuck all the holes of their f
Frat Boys Double Penetrate A Skater
Two naughty boys strip their buddy and have lots of wicked fun
Young skater gay piss tube Days Of Straight Boys Pissing
Skater boys fuck each other gay full length This spectacular
Gay boys masturbating each other Bi Skater Eats Straight Cum
Emo and skater boys gay sex Kyler Moss is a
Big dick skater boys gay first time Standing up, Derek jerked off at a
Gay porn young skater boys fuck older men and porn hot guy m
Short gay teen boy movies and free young teen porn skater boys videos
Teen skater gay sex and young gay small dick boys movies in this
Skater boys piss gay first time You'll wish you were straigh
Gay men fucking sex machines porn movies and gay skater boys porn
Gay dad boys snapchat Two Horny Boys & A Camera
Naked african gay boys horny porn Two Boys Filming Their Raw
Young boys gay sexy fucks Two Horny Boys & A Camera
Anal boys gays xxx snapchat Two Boys Filming Their Raw Fuck
Free video gay sex teens boys collage Two straight boys sucked, with
Teen boys wrestling at home gay Two Boys Filming Their Raw Fuck!
TrafficHolder.com - Buy and Sell Adult Traffic|Trafficshop.com - Let your business grow|Contact Us|Webmaster
All content, including images, text, graphics, video and audio content contained in the website is protected under the laws of copyright, owned or under license to company or its designees,and represents proprietary and valuable intellectual property.
Contact Webmaster 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Powered by Stream Rotator


text:
A Masters degree gives you the opportunity to either further your understanding of a particular question or take off in a completely different way using skills you have gained from your previous undergraduate degree.
Digital design professionals make use of programs, algorithms and data as well as traditional design skills to tool tailored objects and processes for a wide variety of applications. The corporate sector, educational institutions, governmental bodies and charity organizations call upon their talents to visualize and create unique products and concepts.
Since all classes are online, students will not have to appear at classes. Schedules may not be as stringent when taking lessons online. Students can work on and carry out assignments when they are ready and at their personal pace. In several online degree courses, students are not expected to take elective classes unless needed by their major. This allows students to zero in on and study particularly what they need to learn for their business. For many students who have a passion for to learn information relevant to their major, online degree programs work excellent as this approach will save time and aid students gain their degree faster.
Oceania also known as Oceanica is a region centred on the islands of the tropical Pacific Ocean.[4] Opinions of what constitutes Oceania range from its three subregions of Melanesia,Micronesia, and Polynesia[5] to, more broadly, the entire insular region between Asia and the Americas, including Australasia and the Malay Archipelago.
Request Information Best Online Master's Programs in Digital Design in Oceania 2017
The Master of Digital Design is a creative, studio-based program that will ground students in the fundamentals of digital design, introduce them to its principles and practice, and encourage them to apply new knowledge in their own specialist field. [+]
Designers have been using digital tools for many years; but most of these tools imitate traditional techniques such as drafting and layout. Increasingly, innovation in design is a result of using computers to do things that only computers can do.
This is digital design: a practice that engages deeply with digital processes, digital materials, and digital contexts.
Digital designers need to understand the fundamental elements of computing - data and algorithm - and work directly with them to create new processes, forms and practices.
The Master of Digital Design is a creative, studio-based program that will ground students in the fundamentals of digital design, introduce them to its principles and practice, and encourage them to apply new knowledge in their own specialist field.... [-]


text:
Spartan Robotics (#971) is a high-school FIRST robotics team based in Mountain View, CA.
971 is looking forward to getting Geoffrey, our 2017 Stronghold robot back on the playing field to compete with teams from up and down the west coast.
We will be one of the exhibitors at the 2017 Mountain View Technology Showcase.
There are currently 25 Mountain View Technology companies who will be exhibitors. The showcase takes place on Thursday, August 11th from 11am to 2pm at the Mountain View civic plaza on Castro Street.


text:
Top 3 Things The Powerball Winners Can Spend Their Newfound Wealth On
A look at the top 3 items the Powerball winners can purchase. Heads up: Paying for college or taking a vacation didn't make the cut.By Katherine Biek | January 16, 2016
This past week, there was so much anticipation around the record-breaking $1.56 billion Powerball jackpot — and someone ultimately won it. Three someones, actually. So to be helpful, we decided to come up with a list of items these lucky people should consider buying with the $187.2 million they'll each get to take home after taxes.
First up is a new place to live. Unfortunately, you won't have enough to purchase the Playboy Mansion, which is on the market for $200 million and comes with live-in resident Hugh Hefner.
But a private island can be purchased. It'll only cost $160 million to buy this 110-acre one off the coast of Thailand.


text:
It's a Boat! It's a Bus! It's Diva Duck! Exciting amphibious tour over land and sea is fun for everyone. Fully narrated musical tour is 75 minutes, beginning at CityPlace in downtown West Palm Beach. Discount rates for children 0-10.
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd, Suite 800
Palm Beach County, Florida 33401
©2016 DISCOVER THE PALM BEACHES - The Official Tourism Marketing Corporation for Palm Beach County | All Rights Reserved


text:
13 November 2014
Published in Lancet Oncology, researchers have developed a new test that uses a person's genes to determine how likely they are to get prostate cancer after surgery or radiotherapy.
The study, which was led by Dr Robert Bristow, a clinician-scientist at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and Dr Paul Boutros, an investigator at the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, created the genetic test that is able to deliver a quick and accurate result.
It is able to determine with greater precision which men who will prosper from surgery or radiation, and those who will need extra treatment afterwards, such as chemotherapy and hormone therapy to tackle cancer.
Dr Bristow said the findings tackle the ongoing clinical problem of under-treating men with aggressive disease, which will return in 30 to 50 per cent of cases. This is often due to the hidden, microscopic nature of the disease that is already outside the prostate gland during initial treatment.
The predictive test analyses biopsy tissue taken before treatment even starts to detect abnormal DNA and its oxygen content, which is a known factor in prostate cancer metastasis. When combined, this information can predict with almost 80 per cent accuracy.
"This genetic test could increase cure rates in intermediate- to high-risk men by preventing progression to this metastatic spread of prostate cancer," said Dr Bristow.
Posted by Philip Briggs
Health News is provided by Adfero in collaboration with Spire Healthcare. Please note that all copy above is ©Adfero Ltd. and does not reflect views or opinions of Spire Healthcare unless explicitly stated. Additional comments on the page from individual Spire consultants do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of other consultants or Spire Healthcare.
Use one or more of the options below to search for a consultant and link through to view their Spire profile.
fill out this form and we will get back to you:
Please select a hospital
Please enter your details below and we will call you back.
What is the aim of your enquiry?
If we are unable to reach you by phone, please include your email address so that we can get in touch...
© Spire Healthcare Group plc (2016)


text:
Sign up for price alerts
You've been signed up for price alerts!
You're already signed up for this price alert.
Sorry, but we weren't able to sign you up.
Adorn your windows with a floral valance featuring neutral colors and an eye catching pattern this fall and throughout the year. Layer this woven cotton window accent with lace curtains for enhanced rustic charm, and coordinate its traditional design with your country home furnishings. 2" header and a 2.5" rod pocket. Machine wash cold on the gentle cycle, lay flat to dry. Do not use bleach. Imported. 15.5"L x 72"W
Write Your Own Review
Only registered users can write reviews for products purchased. Please, log in or register
Note: It may take up to 72 hours before your review is posted. Please only hit submit once!


text:
Your Co-op Local Forum, led by local Member Pioneer, Danny Douglas, has recognised some great local activity to support in and around Wymondham which will make a real difference to your community.
Working with your local Co-op Food stores and Funeralcare branches the Forum will be looking to support local charities and organisations in your community as well as help promote our fantastic charity partnership with British Red Cross.
Register or get in touch with your Local Forum
Co-operative Local Forums:
Find him on Facebook: Wymondham and Area Co-operative Community Group


text:
Wynonna Judd
Vote for the Most Anticipated Album of February 2016
A readers' poll to determine February 2016's Album of the Month.
Wynonna Judd Joins Pete Scobell Band for Chris Kyle Tribute, 'Hearts I Leave Behind' [Listen]
Wynonna Judd has joined the Pete Scobell Band for a powerful new track that pays tribute to Chris Kyle, whose life is the subject of the Oscar-nominated movie, American Sniper.
Wynonna Judd's Tour Bus Catches Fire
Wynonna Judd is giving thanks after her tour bus caught fire before a big show in Pennsylvania.
Never Forget: Stars Remember on 9/11
Thursday (Sept. 11, 2014) marks the thirteenth anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks -- a series of events which forever changed not only America, but the world.
Wynonna Judd Lends Loving Arms to Kentucky Fire Victims
Wynonna Judd traveled to Nashville this week to visit with a father and daughter who lost nine members of their family in a deadly fire.
Wynonna Judd in Victoria This Saturday
Master Series 3 presents Wynonna Judd at the Victoria Fine Arts Center, 1002 Sam Houston Drive, Saturday, January 18th at 7:30 p.m.
Wynonna Judd Linked to GPS Tracking Device Found on Car
Someone was keeping track of a car linked to Wynonna Judd and her sister Ashley. Now, police in Franklin, Tenn. want to know who -- and why. A GPS device was found on the undercarriage of a vehicle brought to a muffler shop on Friday afternoon (Nov. 8).
Wynonna and Colt Ford Discuss Redneck Roots in New 'Ride Through the Country Revisited' Clip – Exclusive Video
The often verbose Colt Ford is tongue-tied when seated next to country legend Wynonna Judd. Ford is obviously a fan, and he considers it quite an accomplishment that he convinced the famous redhead to join him for a cut on his 'Ride Through the Country Revisited' album. Watch behind-the-scenes footage from the recording studio in this ToC exclusive.
Wynonna Judd to Appear in Victoria
The Victoria Symphony is celebrating its 40th anniversary with performances and big name concerts including Wynonna Judd.
Wynonna Judd Defends Sister Ashley After Wendy Williams' Cruel Comments
Wynonna Judd leapt to the defense of her little sister Ashley after talk show host Wendy Williams attacked the actress over the fact that she is married without children. The country star took to Twitter to comment on how what Williams said was unacceptable.
Kree Harrison Joins Wynonna Judd Onstage in Nashville
Kree Harrison has been sharing the stage with a few country music greats lately. She made her Grand Ole Opry debut with Keith Urban and Kellie Pickler, and on Wednesday (June 5) joined fiery redhead Wynonna Judd onstage at Nashville's 3rd and Lindsley venue.


text:
Your location is set for Ashburn, VA 20147
Select a product to get a quote.
Edit location
Retrieve a saved quote
Log in to My Account
Roadside Rescues When You Need It Most.
Agents near 20147
Edit location
24-hour support
Already covered? Call 1-800-ALLSTATE. Or text ASSIST to 25788 to download the Allstate mobile app*.
You never know when you'll need a hand on the road. Allstate has been a trusted name in dependable roadside assistance for more than 50 years. In the last year alone we provided peace of mind to more than 40 million customers.
Choose from three service options for roadside help. From fixing a flat tire to getting a jump-start, you have options for the emergency help you need. Request help right from your phone and using innovative GPS tracking, follow along on the map as it makes its way to you. It's roadside assistance, on demand.
Motor Club members can enjoy the peace of mind of reliable roadside assistance, plus discounts and travel savings for the whole family.
View Allstate® Motor Club
Want to pay for what you need, when you need it? The Good Hands Rescue means roadside assistance is always at your fingertips.
View Good Hands Rescue®
Interested in covering the cost of common roadside services with your car insurance? Towing & Labor coverage might be right for you.
View Towing & Labor
Help available 24/7
Supported by a nationwide network
Mobile access
Towing and roadside services
Open to anyone, no policy required
Exclusive savings and services
Towing and roadside services
Exclusive savings and services
Talk to an agent about the best plan for you.
Use our 24/7 hotline and digital tools to get the help you need, right when you need it.
With our family plans1, on-time guarantees2 and network of nationwide providers, we lead the way ahead of the rest.
Access to the only network with coverage across North America, including, U.S., Canada, and Guam.
An Allstate agent can help you explore all the Roadside Assistance options and help you choose the services that meet your needs.
Talk to an agent
Download the Allstate Mobile app today.
1 Only available with Allstate Motor Club.
2 With the Allstate Motor Club on-time arrival guarantee, if the service provider arrives more than 30 minutes after the estimated time of arrival, you can receive a 25% discount off of your next year's membership dues.
*Msg&data rates may apply. Privacy: www.allstate.com/privacy. Text HELP for help.
1 Membership pricing reflects this year's dues. All membership plans are products of and are administered by Allstate Motor Club, Inc., 2775 Sanders Roads Ste. E2, Northbrook, IL 60062. All benefits are subject to the terms and conditions in the Membership Guides.
2 With the on-time arrival guarantee, if the service provider arrives more than 30 minutes after the estimated time of arrival, you can receive a 25% discount off of your next year's membership dues.
3 Benefit is not available in TN.
4 Certain states (such as California and Colorado) do not accept arrest bond certificates. Maryland state law requires the Arrest Bond limit to be $1,000. A $1,000 limit also applies in Florida, Georgia, Oregon and Tennessee. Coverage is limited to $500 in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oklahoma and West Virginia. Coverage is limited to $300 in Arizona and Alabama and $250 in Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin.
20147 Edit Location
© 2016 Allstate Insurance Company
Ashburn, VA


text:
Navajo is an amazing rodeo horse. He's placed 2D in barrels winning money, we've also won money for pole bending. He places everywhere we go & people love…$1,500
Rosie is a 14h pony that has been there and done that - eventing, paper chase, trail riding, Hunter shows, pony club, pony rides, camp, etc,. My 7 year…$150
16h registered bay mare Brood mare, companion or trail horse$1
Offered for your consideration. CK Mooned By A Cutie, 2014 ApHC mare. Lottie currently stands 15.1 (still growing) and is N/N for PSSM1, HyPP, HERDA …$2,500
Katniss is a 16h, 2012 daughter of All Hands on Zip. She is 5 panel n/n. Easy breeder, good mother and a lovely mover. Has NOT been started. Is sound and…$2,500
Mel is a 2005, 16.2h ApHC mare by Lads Strawman. She is 5 panel n/n. Easy breeder, easy foaler, great mom. Has had color on most of her foals and is bred…$4,500
Ella is a 2016 daughter by Leading ApHC sire Hands of a Hero out of a daughter of Lads Strawman. Ella should mature to 16.2 h and is 5 panel N/N to top…$5,000
Charmsley Suit N Tie (Tie) is a very sweet chestnut roan pony looking for a kid of his own to love him. Tie will start training this coming winter. He…$3,000


text:
Cylindrical vase
browse these categories for related items...
Directory: Antiques: Regional Art: Ancient World: Egyptian: Stone: Pre AD 1000: Item # 1341438
Directory: Antiques: Regional Art: Ancient World: Egyptian: Stone: Pre AD 1000: Item # 1341438
Please refer to our stock # 20142742 when inquiring.
J. Bagot Arqueología - Ancient Art
View Seller Profile
c/ Consell de Cent 278, Bajos 1
08007 Barcelona, SPAIN
0034 93 140 53 26
Guest Book
View Seller Profile
c/ Consell de Cent 278, Bajos 1
08007 Barcelona, SPAIN
0034 93 140 53 26
Guest Book
CULTURE: Ancient Egypt PERIOD: Dynasties I – III, c. 3.000 – 2.648 BC MATERIAL: Alabaster DIMENSIONS: Height 25 cm; diameter 10.1 cm PROVENANCE: Private collection, Holland, acquired in the 1970s. CONDITION: Intact, in a good state of preservation. There is some erosion to the lower part of the vase due to past contact with water. DESCRIPTION: The form is supremely simple: a long cylinder with almost vertical sides, a flat base and at the top, a prominent round lip. Under good light the transparency of the alabaster can be seen with whitish horizontal undulations from the natural marbling of the stone, making the vase even more impressive. Two circular bands worked in relief run around the perimeter of the neck just under the lip. These are decorated with small diagonal incisions to give the effect of two fine ropes. Certain wear and blackening of the vessel are present due to the effects of contact with water. Before being carved in different kinds of stone, vases similar in shape were made of terracotta by Egyptian potters. In ancient Egypt, stone vases were regarded as significant luxury items: they only appear in the royal tombs and the highest ranking graves. The art of carving stone vessels has reached its climax at times as remote as the Early Dynastic period and the Old Kingdom already. Stone vessels were mainly used to contain food, unguents and cosmetic oils, and to store them thanks to the thickness and impermeability of their walls. All these substances had many uses in daily life (food, medicines), but they also played a leading role in the religious (offerings in temples, daily unctions of the statues and cult objects) and funeral sphere (preparation of the mummies, belief in the rejuvenating and regenerating effect of these substances). It is therefore not surprising that a very large number of stone vessels were regularly deposited in shrines and in funerary complexes.
Similar Items from this seller
|Egyptian basalt scarab. New Kingdom.
|Egyptian silex knife. Early Pre-Dynastic
|Heart Scarab