text:
Buy the BONE DAGGER 7" at Suckerpunch Records: http://suckerpunchrecords.bigcartel.com/product/bobby-joe-ebola-bone-dagger-7
Holy dragon guts! It's here… the majestically animated music video for the mighty silly Bobby Joe Ebola song, "Bone Dagger"! Directed and created by Mike Foxall at XRAY STUDIOS (http://www.xraystudios.com/), Bone Dagger is full of laughs, blood and sexual regret! Please watch, share with your friends and REPOST!
And go buy the BONE DAGGER VINYL 7" or the BONE DAGGER SUPER BUNDLE on SUCKERPUNCH RECORDS! The SUPER BUNDLE includes a limited color vinyl 7" record and features a Judas Priest cover song (Take On The World) as the b-side, a Bone Dagger themed GIANT poster, a sticker and a t-shirt! To purchase this super cool stuff, visit the Suckerpunch Records online store here: http://suckerpunchrecords.bigcartel.com/product/bobby-joe-ebola-bone-dagger-7
And make sure to check out the upcoming new Bobby Joe Ebola LP/CD, "Trainwreck To Narnia"! For more info on the band, visit http://bobbyjoeebola.com & http://facebook.com/bobbyjoeebola
Directed and animated by Mike Foxall at XRAY STUDIOS
Music & lyrics by Abbott/Redford
Recorded & mixed by Craig Billmeier at The Dutch Oven, Oakland (http://www.yourmother.com/dutchoven/)
Mastered by CJ DeVillar for Songworx (http://http://songworx.com)
Vinyl 7" record produced by Suckerpunk Records (http://suckerpunchrecords.com)
BONE DAGGER studio personnel:
Corbett Redford - VOCALS, Dan Abbott - GUITAR, VOCALS, Craigums - GUITAR, Joshua Wharton - DRUMS, Sean McTiernan - BASS, Melissa Avignon Redford - FLUTE, Ami Lawless - SCREAMS and featuring Rushad Eggleston - CELLO
This post was created by a user and has not been vetted or endorsed by BuzzFeed's editorial staff. BuzzFeed Community is a place where anyone can post awesome lists and creations. Learn more or post your buzz!
- Donald Trump broke with decades of US policy by speaking with the president of Taiwan Friday, a move that could anger China.
- A jury failed to reach a verdict Friday in the case of Michael Slager, a former South Carolina officer charged in the fatal shooting of Walter Scott.
- The CEO of Zenefits plans to step down after 10 months on the job. A legal mess nearly sank the company this year.
- A UFC fighter is asking people to crush apples with their bare hands 🍎💪

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
4% of that group favored current policies. However, support for the current policies grew in the senior group, with 41.2% of people over age 65 supporting the current gun control policies.
Gender was one area where stereotypes proved to be very reliable at predicting a person's attitude towards gun control. The hypothesis was that females would be much greater advocates of gun control than men, and the results reflected that they were. Males were more than three times as likely to believe it should be easier to acquire a gun than females were; 5.7% of males held that belief compared to 1.8% of women. Males were also more likely to be content with the current gun control policy, as almost half of all males, 49%, believed that the current policy should remain unchanged. In contrast, only 33% of females believed that the current policy should remain unchanged. 65.2% of females believed that there should be a stricter gun control policy, while 45.4% of males were in favor of a stricter gun control policy.
The hypothesis was that Christians, both Protestants and Catholics, would favor gun control because of their religions' stated preferences for non-violence. In addition, the hypothesis was that Jews would not advocate for gun control because their religion places less of an emphasis on non-violence. Those hypotheses were partially correct. The majority of Protestants and Catholics favored some type of gun control policy, with only 4.3% of Protestants and 4.5% of Catholics stating that they thought it should be easier to buy a gun. In fact, 47.3% of Protestants and 61% of Catholics favored a stricter gun control policy, while 48.4% of Protestants and 34.6% of Catholics favored the current gun control policy. However, the hypothesis about Jewish attitude towards gun control disproved the hypothesis. 96.7% of Jews favored a stricter gun control policy, 3.3% thought the current policy should remain unchanged, and 0.0% of Jews thought it should be easier to acquire a gun. Moreover, when comparing Christians to those identifying as "other," the religious or cultural differences between Protestants, Catholics, and other became clearer. Protestants were about 10% less likely to favor stricter gun control than "other," which was about 4% less likely to favor stricter gun control than Catholics, who were over 35% less likely to favor stricter gun control than Jews.
Military Service
Not surprisingly, military service had a statistically significant impact on attitudes towards gun control policies. People who had served in the military were much more likely support current policies or actually believe it should be easier to acquire a gun. Almost half of those in the military, 49.3%, supported current gun control policies, versus 39.5% of civilians. Moreover, 5.6% of those who had served in the military believed it should be easier to acquire a gun, versus 3.4% of civilians. That is not to suggest that military service meant that people would not support stricter gun control. 45.1% of people who had served or were serving in the military favored a stricter gun control policy. While that number was substantially smaller than the 57.1% of the general population who supported a stricter gun control policy, it still reflected strong support for gun control.
Opponents of gun control site the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment and its unequivocal right to bear arms as the reason they want it to be easier for people to access weapons. The Second Amendment states that, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S. Const. amend. II). While much is made of the militia qualification, looking through the Federalist papers and other documents, it is clear that the founding fathers believed that the people needed to be able to defend themselves against the government. (See generally, Hamilton, Federalist 28 and Federalist 29). Moreover, history shows that the fact that American government has a standing army does not abrogate the need for Americans to have access to weapons, since a well-armed citizenry allowed citizens during the American Revolution to seize "political control at the grass roots." (Hardy). While this shows strong support for the right to bear arms, the reality is that almost all Americans, without regard to political affiliation, religion, gender, military service, age, or education, support some type of gun control. Perhaps this reflects an acknowledgment that the founding fathers could not have conceived of the type of weaponry available today, or maybe the amount of gun violence has people willing to reconsider the Second Amendment. What impact that will have on gun control or on the public perception of who favors…[continue]
"Gun Control Is One Of" (2009, May 13) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gun-control-is-one-of-21895
"Gun Control Is One Of" 13 May 2009. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gun-control-is-one-of-21895>
"Gun Control Is One Of", 13 May 2009, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/gun-control-is-one-of-21895
Moreover, given the various other causes of accidental death, most notably automobiles, banning guns on that basis would be spurious, unless the state took other measures to reduce accidental deaths, such as the banning of automobiles. Some people suggest that weapon regulation, rather than banning weapons is the solution. After all, nothing in the Second Amendment prohibits the regulation of guns. Moreover, some type of weapons regulation is supported by
Gun control is one of the most polarizing issues of our time. Because this is such a controversial subject, it is actually harder to make a coherent case -- others are arguing in circles, twisting facts to suit their agendas, and misusing statistics as a matter of routine. This does not mean that we cannot have a reasonable discussion about the subject of gun control, just that we seldom do.
Furthermore, it is suggested that the roots of the problem lie deeper than the superficial debate about gun control. In sociological terms, this problem is to do with the lack of meaning and the breakdown of inherent normative structures. In this sense the debate about gun control should be seen against the underlying background of these sociological issues. Even if a compromise was be reached about whether or not to
Gun Control Problems in America The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The Founding Fathers included this in our Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might coerce the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves
Gun Control in the American Society The issue of gun control has been a primary social and political problem in the American society, most especially when 'spree killings' have become prevalent among young adults in high schools all over the country. The issue of gun control is always brought up when such killings occur, most especially when a young individual is involved and is the primary suspect in the killings.
Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People The article carried on the New York Times dated 28 February 2013 christened 'Guns and Gun Control' highlights a number of issues that relates to the whole issue of guns. The debate surrounding the issue of gun possession and a prohibition of the same is a thorny issue and as such, it has been an elicited debate at different levels of government in the
GUN CONTROL & PUSH FOR GUN CONTROL Surname The research paper is on gun control and the push for gun control. To respond to the topic the paper first lays down in the first paragraph basic concepts of the gun control ideals and the pro-gun movement. The introduction explores the basic tenets and motivations of the pro-gun and gun control activists in America. The paper uses the motivation and opposition of both


text:
Phone: (289) 320-8250
1238 Dominion Road
Fort Erie, Ontario, L2A 1H7
To view our complete product offer in your area, we suggest you select this RONA.
At anytime you can select another RONA store or a RONA L'Entrepôt/ Home & Garden. The product selection listed will match the selected store.
Multi-Usage Mycomix Transplanter - "Performance" - 6 LBoost the growth or your grass, flowers, bushes and trees with Ferti-Pro "Performance" multi-usage Mycomix transplanter. This powerful organic fertilizer contains the supplement glomus intraradices to accelerate plant growth and promote fast, dense coverage of new grass seedling. Featuring high-quality minerals and organic elements such as bone meal, feather meal, seaweed, and potassium sulphate, mycomix transplanter ensures maximum water uptake in water stress conditions for a healthy-looking lawn. Accredited OMRI (Organic Material Review Institute).


text:
7 CFR 4284.4 - Appeals.
Beta! The text on the eCFR tab represents the unofficial eCFR text at ecfr.gov.
§ 4284.4 Appeals.
Any appealable adverse decision made by the Agency may be appealed in accordance with USDA appeal regulations found at 7 CFR part 11 and subpart B of part 1900. If the Agency makes a determination that a decision is not appealable, a participant may request that it be reviewed by the Director of the National Appeals Division.
Title 7 published on 2015-01-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 7 CFR Part 4284 after this date.


text:
Aelfie Roswell Gold Throw Blanket
Aelfie Roswell Gold Throw Blanket
Cream and gold Roswell Throw Blanket from Aelfie. We love the alien-inspired print on this fun throw, made from a slightly stretchy and thick cotton blend. Handmade in the USA, measures 50" x 60". Made from 80% recycled cotton and 20% acrylic. Machine washable!
Shipping and returns (when eligible) are FREE for purchases from US and Canadian boutiques when shipped to customers located in the US or Canada. We offer a flat shipping fee of $20 for all international transactions.
Shipping Details
Returns are accepted on full-priced items except when item is marked as Final Sale. All sale items, including Make an Offer items, are FINAL SALE.
Returns Policy


text:
Consumer Complaints and Reviews
Things keep falling apart. The window is making a noise, the armrests have no leather on them... It's all flaked off. And now the TRANSMISSION. I was told by multiple people that it would easily go to over 200K miles... It's falling apart at 150,0000. LEXUS is only a luxury model because of its PRICE!!! Resell value sucks too!
It has always been my dreams to one day own a Lexus. However, this is not what I intended or expected from such a prestigious and renowned luxury car dealership. Two weeks after purchasing my Pre Owned Certified Lexus ES 350 I have had nothing but major problems with this car, both mechanical and interior issues. The paint on the car is fading and very spotty, the armrest and the leather seats are tearing apart by the day. Typically I am the only one using the car, other than my husband who has his own car, and I do not have any children that would exacerbate the problem. Just recently there was a problem with my trunk latch that was making it almost impossible to close my trunk. I took it to the dealership, and thank goodness it was covered by the warranty.
Once I received the car back, about a week later, I noticed the same thing started happening again with the latch, and I also noticed an echo sound when closing the trunk that was not there before they serviced the vehicle. Immediately I contacted their corporate office and told them my concerns, but to no avail. They offered me a voucher that could probably pay for one tire, and just wished me away. I really feel abandoned and betrayed by this dealership, and to some degree, heart broken because this was my dream car. I hope that they can get these current problems resolved without dragging me through a long and drawn out process, and not having to obtain a lawyer to get to the bottom of these issues. If anyone has any suggestions or comments that could help me, I would greatly appreciate it.
Purchased a 2012 CT200h in July 2016. The car was advertised as certified but ended up not being certified due to the airbag recall. Bought the car due to my previous experience with Toyota/Lexus being highly reliable car and it also only had 31k miles. Soon after driving off the lot noticed a clicking noise every time you brake. Figured it was a cv axle noise so waited until the first service to address(car also had drivetrain warranty remaining). Took the car in for the 35k service and dealer diagnosed the noise as a failing brake actuator and recommended replacing it for $3450.
The dealer and I opened a case with Lexus customer service. After 2 weeks I get a call saying they do not fix noise issues under warranty. Even if my car was certified they still would not fix it. Went to talk to dealer next day and the service manager told me his CT200h makes the same noise and "it doesn't bother him." Dealer also told me I should have bought an extended warranty (Right after telling me even the warranty doesn't cover it!?!?!?!). Escalated the Case with Lexus and received a callback saying nothing has failed so I just need to deal with the noise.
After this experience I'd recommend to stay away from Lexus. Once you drive off the lot it doesn't matter if you have a used or new car they do not care if you are satisfied with the product or not. Considered trading in my CT200h for a brand new one, but that wouldn't help my issue because they told me even if it was brand new and the brake actuator made the same loud clicking noise every time I touch the brake pedal it wouldn't be covered or fixed. So I'll look at other brand cars to spend 40K on.
I am on my third IS Model Lexus and like the product. Unfortunately I have found my new 2016 IS 300 AWD stalls or feels like fuel starvation when I sometimes go to make a turn either right or left at low speeds or intersections. It becomes very concerning when you are turning into traffic or across traffic and it feels like you will not make it across the intersections. The yellow flashing engine light comes on but I have notified the dealership 3 times (at Service Intervals) and no fault can be found. Has anyone else experienced similar challenges with their Lexus IS 300 AWD too?
I purchased a 2013 ES 350 new... was very satisfied until Sept. 24 2016. The vehicle had a little more than 19000 miles when someone failed to yield the right of way and collided with my wife near the front and left driver door while she was driving the vehicle. The damage was extensive and the insurance declared the vehicle a total loss. My concern is that neither of the airbags deployed during the collision. The other vehicle involved airbag(s) did deploy.
I contacted Lexus and gave them permission to inspect the data image on the vehicle to let me know why the airbags did not deploy. As of October 21 2016 I have not heard anything from them. I have contacted Customer service several times but did not get any information. The vehicle has been towed to a totaled lot. Not sure how long the vehicle will be available for their inspection. I have owned four Lexus vehicles and have not had any problems. I am now concerned if I replace the vehicle with another Lexus will there be a safety issue. Damage images are available if requested.
How do I know I can trust these reviews about Lexus?
- 634,392 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
For more information about reviews on ConsumerAffairs.com please visit our FAQ.
I purchased a 2016 Lexus ES350 in May 2016. For the first year Lexus offers a one year complimentary subscription to their Enform Safety Connect and Service Connect features. The Service Connect feature is supposed to provide maintenance alerts and the health of your vehicle through a Vehicle Health Report available by e-mail or by viewing the Health Report on the Lexus Drivers Website.
The Service Connect feature has never worked from the day I picked up the car. Since May I have called Lexus Corporate 5 times about this issue and contacted the Lexus dealership twice but I get no satisfactory answers. No one can tell me what the problem is nor can they resolve the issue. Frankly I have given up on getting this issue resolved. Lexus wants $164.89 for a one year subscription for the Safety and Service Connect package. I have, therefore, decided not to renew the subscription when my one year complimentary subscription ends. Lexus has the audacity to charge $164.89 for a service where one the components of the subscription they cannot provide.
I have had other issues that I have called Lexus Corporate about. I used their Built IT tool and I relied on information on their website when I configured my ES350. However, when I went to the dealership to order the car I found that some of the information was wrong and the car could not be ordered in the configuration per their Build It tool. In addition, when I took delivery of the car I found that the interior of the car was not what was shown per the Build It tool. When I complained to Lexus Corporate about it I was told Lexus was not responsible for any incorrect information on their website and if I relied on that information then that was my problem. This was my first Lexus and it will be my last. The Customer Service is simply not what one expects from a high end car company. I have had Mercedes cars in the past and if I had an issue they promptly took care of it. Lexus does not seem to care about their customers.
I have a Lexus GS460 2011 and been using for more than three years now, and recently my ABS broke down. We bought new one for 4,000 dollars. After replacing it, unfortunately, the same problem occur. That means I have to buy again new one for another 4,000 dollars. Company should make it cheaper because the cause of the problem is from the manufacturer side. I am thinking of buying another car before the incident happened but now I have doubts and confusion to buy or not because I'm scared to take risk the same issues might occur.
I've received a Warranty Enhancement Notification ZLD over a year ago and the Lexus dealership that I take my 2006 RX330 for service tells each time I contact them about fixing my dashboard that the parts are not available. I'm writing this to find out when the parts to fix my RX330 dashboard will be available at the dealerships. This issue has lowered the resale value of my RX330.
I am an owner of 2006 GX 470 with a dashboard full of cracks. I received notice in July of 2015 that the dashboard replacement will be covered under an extended warranty Lexus must have created because of the volume of complaints received by other owners. My directions were to contact the local dealer, Wilde Lexus of Sarasota, Florida and register my VIN number and name and the dashboard would be replaced sometime in the first quarter of 2016. Today, Sept. 26, 2016 I called Wilde Lexus to get another update and I'm told I am 9th on the list. Funny, because my last inquiry, I was 6th on the list. The service rep. had no excuse for this. So I asked what I could expect and she had no idea. She said the last shipment of dashboards was in July 2016 and nothing since.
I then called Lexus Corp and spoke with a customer rep who knew even less. In fact she said dealers are getting a couple of dashboards weekly and the manufacturer is not keeping up with demand. She has NOOOO estimate or timeline to share with me. I told her Wilde Lexus has not received a shipment for over 2 months and they have no idea when to expect another. This is very poor customer service on behalf of the Corporate Lexus. I don't have an issue with Wilde, in fact they are great with service and maintain a high customer satisfaction level, in this case it's corporate who's letting down their customers. I'm not sure I would buy another Lexus because of this... however Wilde has a Jaguar, Honda, Rover, and a few other brands that I would consider over Lexus.
I purchased my 2012 Lexus in 2013 with a little over 6,000 miles. I paid extra for the additional warranty and the Auto Butler which is supposed to protect your car from scratches, etc. This is a car that retails over $50,000.00. There is only one driver (which is shouldn't matter) and the front and back seats which are leather is cracking. There has been minimal use in this vehicle. I took it to Freeman Lexus and they admitted that other customers have the same complaint but it's not covered under the warranty and Corporate would have to cover it. I contacted Corporate and they said they wouldn't do anything about it.
This car is too new to have this issue and is a factory defect or inferior product of leather if you ask me. I do NOT recommend anyone purchasing a Lexus especially if you expect to have a luxury car and put out 50k+. I owned a 2006 Lexus and never had problems. Apparently, Lexus pricing has increased substantially and their quality has declined along with their service. Shame on Lexus for using poor products and costing consumers.
I have been leasing a 2015 Lexus CT200h. Within 6 months into my lease radio started turning off and resetting back to factory settings. Meaning all my channels, bass, treble settings all of that got deleted. Bluetooth would have to be reconnected each time. I reached out to Lexus of Seattle immediately to resolve the issue. The dealer told me there's nothing they can do about it.. Shocker.. I then reached out to customer satisfaction who then arranged for the car to be looked at, at Lexus of Bellevue. They began telling me it's my phone, or my bluetooth connection. After going through 3 different phones and the issue persisting they finally had a technician who was able to have the same issue happen to him while he was connected on HIS personal cell phone. So finally they agreed to replace the radio with a NEW radio.
Well after installment of the "new" radio turns out it wasn't so new, and more than like refurbished because someone else was already listed on the bluetooth connectivity. I had pointed this out to the dealer who simply told me to "deal with it" and "there is nothing else they can do". Fast forward 2.5 years later I am driving a LEXUS with a radio that goes out every other time I drive it. I AGAIN reached out to customer satisfaction which at this point, mind you, this is 3 brand new phones later, 2 stereos later, customer satisfaction is telling me I need to go to the dealer AGAIN, have them mimic the problem AGAIN, (mimicking the problem could take several tries and several trips) and go through the whole procedure which I already had gone through, AGAIN! I kept on explaining to them that there is not justifying this kind of nonsense.
If this vehicle clearly has a flaw, either take the vehicle back and call it a lemon or stop wasting my time! This vehicle is a lemon! I have told them this so many times and all they say is that because it is not a safety issue they will not consider it as a lemon. Well, it is a safety issue! When I am driving on the freeway and the radio goes out on a 2015 Lexus am I to pull over every time and quickly try to reset all my channels just so I can have the "luxury" of listening to music?? Or perhaps I should drive in silence and just reminisce on the good old days when a 1999 Ford would have a working stereo with no issues? This is a safety issue. It distracts me from my drive. It interrupts my drive!
I will never consider buying a Lexus again! There has been ZERO customer satisfaction in my whole experience since driving off the lot on this godawful car and the run around that I have been put on to resolve an issue on THEIR car! It's a lease. It's not even my car and Lexus has done nothing to ensure that I am satisfied. Lexus should be embarrassed that a 2015 Lexus doesn't have an operable stereo. So much for "Pursuit of perfection". What a joke.
I am sure there are by far better manufacturers that appreciate their consumers and go above and beyond to ensure that the consumer is happy. At this point Lexus Customer Satisfaction is telling me to either keep wasting my time, gas, money to go to a dealer to "diagnose" the faulty stereo (which as stated above has ALREADY BEEN DONE) or there is nothing else they can do... Boy Lexus you really have screwed your reputation. Never did I think I would be saying this about Lexus. Thanks to the lovely Lexus dealers that were least bit helpful, and thank you to Customer satisfaction, the irony in that, I will never been buying, looking, considering or recommending a Lexus to anyone.
I bought a new brand Lexus IS 350 one month ago. Now with only 600 miles driven, the car brake pads are not working. Lexus warranty also does not cover brake pads because they know that their brake pads' quality is more than **. If I have to change its brake pads in every 600 miles then I have to change my brake pads 100 times until mileage of 6000 miles. Every time I will spend $300 to buy new pads so only pads will cost me $30,000. United States should consider businessing with Japan who sell Chinese products.
Incredibly my Lexus GX 470 has the paint peeling off the roof (Already peeled off the hood, which they agreed to fix) and now Lexus Corporate refuses to pay to have the roof repainted. This is not a CHEAP VEHICLE and one that you would expect this from. I am driving around with grey headliner exposed in 2 big areas of the roof and top of windshield- what an advertisement for Lexus to show everyone how bad Lexus Vehicle paint jobs are. So incredibly dissatisfied with Lexus Corporate refusing to make good on a problem that never should happen with a SUV they make. Will NEVER PURCHASE ANOTHER LEXUS!!!
In March 2016 I had a blowout on my way to Florida with my 2010 Lexus. A near tragedy since I had to pull off onto a very narrow shoulder of the road with semis passing at 70 miles per hours. Two months later my tire dealer told me two my tires Bridgestone Turanza with less than 20,000 were in need of replacement. When I purchased this certified pre-owned Lexus from Lexus of Englewood NJ, I was informed that all 5 tires were new. In 35 years I have not had tires that have worn out in less than 35-40,000 miles.
As a result I contacted the manager of pre-owned sales at Lexus of Englewood and told him I did not believe the tires had been replaced at the time of my purchase of the vehicle. He promised to look into the matter and get back to me. That was in May 2016. I have heard nothing. I next wrote to Lexus Customer Service with the same complaint in June 2016 but have heard nothing from them. Finally, I wrote to Jeff Bracken, Group Vice President and General Manager of the Lexus Division, with the same complaint and requested the courtesy of a reply. That was in late June and I have received no response.
I have a 2009 Lexus ES350 which has been recalled because of the passenger Air Bag. Yesterday, I tried to get some updated information as what to expect with this recall. I contacted both Lexus and my local dealer in Orlando. No one was able to provide any information -- how long before being fixed, etc. I asked for a supervisor at Lexus and they said that it would be 48 hours before I would receive a call.
At my local dealership, I was able to talk to a lady in charge of customer (un)relations and she was no help. I asked to speak to the General Manager and was denied. She said that she was as high as I could go. I do not know about you, but when companies deny you the opportunity to voice your concerns to higher management, I am extremely concerned about a business who operates in this manner. I like my car, but the service and lack of information from a supposedly Luxury car company is appalling. My last Lexus. This type of customer service is very short sighted and will cost Lexus millions of dollars -- not the way to keep repeat customers!!
My first experience with Lexus of Wilmington was about 3 and a half years ago. I had just purchased my GX470 which had a few months of the manufacturer's warranty remaining. I had the car inspected by my mechanic. He said he noticed a little coolant residue near one of the inlet/outlet pipes and suggested I take it to a dealer to replace the seals at this location. I called Lexus of Wilmington and explained the issue to a service manager. The service manager told me that such an issue was not covered under the 3 year warranty. I then called the service department at Lexus of Atlantic City and spoke with Chuck **. He told me the repair I needed was in fact covered by the warranty. He told me to bring my vehicle in and they'd fix it free of charge. FIXED, done, no charge, free loaner, and my car was clean as a whistle when I picked it up.
A few months ago I filled the tank at the usual gas station. This gas station was closed for a week while they replaced their pumps. I waited until they reopened and then filled up. The fuel I got had a load of metal particles in it. My vehicle began running poorly. I tried to leave it with Lexus of Atlantic City but they had just closed. I had no choice but to take it to the nearest Lexus dealer I could find. I reluctantly left the vehicle with Lexus of Wilmington. They had to drain the gas tank and replace filters and all the fuel injectors. That repair cost $3007.00. I picked the vehicle up and within 50 miles of driving my gas gauge went dead. I took the vehicle back to Lexus of Wilmington.
Their diagnosis was that a part they replaced had, as said to me, (fried) and now my gas gauge too was (fried). I was told that it had nothing to do with the previous repair work. I asked if the previous repair had never happened would the gas gauge have been (fried) anyway. I was told this recent damage would have happened anyway. When I picked up my vehicle I was told the good news that the part they previously replaced in the gas level sending process was under warranty (one of the fried parts). I tried to suggest that perhaps a mechanic made a mistake or a faulty replacement part had shorted out my gas gauge. The service manager reluctantly wrote on a parts sheet (No explanation, poss. power surge from previous repair). The gas gauge remediation required a new dash panel (the whole thing, tach, speedo, etc.) which cost me $1310.20.
I'm not a Lexus mechanic but I believe the facts speak for themselves. Either a mistake or faulty part led to this $1300 repair. Lexus of Wilmington would not entertain the notion that they or Lexus parts should take responsibility for the subsequent repair expense I incurred. The loaners I was provided made me think of trading my vehicle in for a new one.
Although I'm aware that service and sales are not related I cannot bring myself to engage in the purchase of a vehicle from this dealership. I think the ability to explain good experiences or problems with a dealership in a venue like this are invaluable to the consumer. I suggest to anyone reading this that they should keep service and sales separate when evaluating a dealership. Lexus of Wilmington does a good job in their sales (I sent my nephew there and they gave him a great deal) but if you read the service comments only you will see that the quality of their service department's customer satisfaction has deteriorated.
Turned in my leased 2014 GS350 three months early to a dealer in Idaho on 10 June 2016. I leased the vehicle in California. I paid my three months of payments and was told by the dealer that the car was in excellent shape. Two months later, I receive a bill from Lexus Financial requiring that I pay over $230 for excess wear and use. When I called them about it, they claim that the front bumper was cracked and they have posted a picture of it on an internet website. The picture was taken 5 days after I turned the car in to the dealer. I told three different customer service reps that there was no crack when I left the car at the dealership. They don't care. Lexus Financial is requiring full payment, as the last "customer service" rep told me that my contract states that I am responsible for damage occurring to the vehicle AFTER I turn it in.
I called customer service at Lexus Corporate and complained. That representative took my information and placed it in my file, which she said she would do nothing with... which left me appalled. She asked me what I expected her to do with the complaint so I told her that I would expect that Lexus would care enough about a customer who, prior to this issue, was ecstatic about their Lexus experience to reach out and remedy the situation to the customer's complete satisfaction. Apparently, they don't do that. It is sad, because the experience I had with Newport Lexus and Riverside Lexus is now being spoiled forever by Lexus Financial over $230. If they do nothing about it, they are surely a stupid company.
I am very disappointed with this so called luxury brand. I have received 3 different recall letters for parts in my IS250. I had to wait over a year for a dashboard and the Lexus reps seem not to have any idea when I be able to replace my door panels. NOW I have to wait for a new a year for an airbag on top of that, thanks Lexus for keeping me safe. I contacted the corporate office and was told that I shouldn't allow people to ride in the front seat of my car, and in the same sentence was told that I may not receive any other notification until the end of the year first on 2017!!! How can such a well known "luxury brand" be so careless with customers. On top of the that the 3rd rep I spoke to tried to sell me a new model!! First rep hung up on me, 2nd rep stayed silent on the phone like we were high school teenagers, and the 3rd rep tried to sell me a car.
I will never purchase or recommend this shady brand to anyone! Having this car has been nothing but a nightmare. I've also had the same error message come on and the service people have NO CLUE what's causing it, but continue to take my money for diagnoses! When I go in for scheduled service there are never loaner cars, and there have been times where I have been misquoted for services and had to pay more. I am not sure what to do at this point, Lexus has the same problem. Not a Lexus fan any longer. I guess I should start driving Uber since I can only have people in the back seat.
With 89000+ miles, I was told the timing cover gasket was leaking and to replace it would cost $3000+ because the engine must be pulled. I asked what type of gasket would be replaced. The service manager stated that a "liquid gasket" would be replaced and that Lexus does not use a fiber gasket. He also stated that the liquid gasket melts from the heat of the engine and causes the leak which happens quite often. When I checked Toyota I found the company uses a fiber gasket on their timing cover. This is a definite design flaw in the RX 350. No doubt the melting of the liquid gasket contaminates the oil. Because of the risk of the leak to happen again, as soon as I can afford it, the RX 350 will be traded for a Toyota. It proves that Lexus vehicles are high maintenance and too expensive to own.
My car was purchased June of 2006. In 2012 I was on my home my low oil light came on. When I got home I had my husband check my oil and he said there was no oil on the dipstick. He asked if I had just had my oil change told him no. Said thought maybe they forgot to put the cap back on. He looked under the car and there was no sign of oil leaking. I call Lexus and explained what happened and was advised to bring it in. I brought car in and was told there was no sign of a leak. Told them "I know it's not leaking but it is burning somewhere." Said they checked everything and it looks good.
My car continued to have this oil problem and I was putting oil before it was time for an oil change. For the past 4 years I have been putting at least 5 quarts of oil every other month. This has really been a burden to pay so much for a luxury car that's been giving me problems within 6 year old. I contact Lexus Corp which was a lost cause they are no help and do not want to do anything to help me. This could've very well been part of a recall that consumers may have a complaint but was never recorded. If anyone has had or still having this same problem with this year model please respond.
On July 5, 2015 my husband took my car to the Lexus Orland Park, IL dealership to have an oil change. On arriving, the serviceman told him that my car needed other work. My husband already knew that he could not authorize any service on my car without my approval. So my husband called me on his phone and let me speak to the serviceman on his phone. I explained to the salesman that I was headed out of town the following day and did not want to do any other work until I returned. I told him to only do the oil change. He was adamant about my windshield wipers and said that I really need new ones. So I told him only do the oil change and wipers. Minutes later I received an email with a price of $417. I called the serviceman and ask how much was the wipers and why was the bill so high. He told me I needed a 90,000 service and that he went ahead and did it. I told him I did not authorize him to do the 90,000 mile service.
He told me that my husband told him to do the 90,000 miles service. He told my husband, after he got off the phone with me that I said to do the oil change and wipers and 90,000 service. So my husband signed for the work. When I called him to asked him why did he do what I did not authorized him to do, he said, my husband told him to do it. After he got off my husband's phone he lied and told my husband that I had authorized the 90,000 miles service and then lied to me saying my husband had authorized the work. I told him I would not pay for it and I wanted to speak to his manager, but his manager said that there was nothing he could do but give me 10% off because the work had been done. These people are frauds. So do not take your cars to them. They will do work you did not authorize and will keep your car if you can't pay. I will be writing to the States Attorney office, they need to be investigated.
I purchased a 2014 Lexus IS 250 in February. Since buying the car I have noticed the gray spots popping up everywhere in the paint, so I took the car to Lexus of South Atlanta to have them look at it. They told me it was from bird poop, which I knew was not the case since my car stays clean. I had three other people look at the car after that to tell me it was not bird poop causing the paint to do that, that it was a defect with the paint they used to paint the car. Since the car is still under all warranties I call the Corporate office of Lexus and opened a case. Once I was contacted by the case worker I explained the issue to her and she then told me to take it to the closest Lexus dealer and have them do a work order and inspect the car she would then follow up with me. So I called the dealer and set up a time to bring it in.
When I got to the dealer the service manager at Lexus of South Atlanta was so rude to me and told me he could not look at my car due to the rain which made no sense seeing how the car was in the shop not outside. The following day my case worker called and then told me I had to bring it back and try and have them look at it again so that being the 3rd time taking it to that dealership. They took pictures of my car and told me that they would be sent off to cooperate then they would let me know when I needed to bring my car in yet again for the 4th time to have a man from Corporate look at the car.
The following week my case worker calls to tell me Lexus of South Atlanta had contacted her and said nothing was wrong with the car and they would not be fixing it. I asked her who she spoke with. It was the service manager there which he had no part in speaking to me or writing the work order to know what was going on with the car. She was going to close my case since he had called. I complained and she said we can go to the next step and have a man from Corporate look at it.
Finally the man from Corporate was able to look at the car. When we first met and I was showing him the spots he says "oh yeah something is going on here," then ask if we can have a body shop look at it since he was not aware that the whole car had spots. He thought it was just the door and a finder. So we took it to a body shop near the dealership which is one Lexus uses quite often. A few different men that work at the body shop look over the car and say they think it's from a chemical and that it would be $10k to repaint.
The man from Corporate then tells me if it was just the one panel and door he would fix it no problem but it being the whole car they don't feel that it's a paint defect and that they won't fix it. The service manager was trying his hardest to talk us out of wanting the car fixed. Told me my rims would come back scratched, that the value of my car will drop so much that if I traded it in I wouldn't get anything for, but if I was to trade it in how it sits with spots all over I'm sure I would get way less than what I would if the paint was fixed.
I picked Lexus as a car because they are suppose to be nice cars that won't give you problems as long as you maintain them like you should and only owning my since February and seeing how I get treated at their dealerships makes me want to never own one again and to make sure everyone I know, knows how terrible their customer service is. Their cars are not cheap and there is no reason my car should have messed up paint.
I truly think Lexus doesn't want to fix my car because of the price it will cost them. And dealing with their Corporate office is just as bad as dealing with Lexus of South Atlanta. If you miss the call and call back like the case workers ask you to do in the voice message they leave you, can never get in touch with them, and they won't call back for another day or two. I highly recommend if you're considering a Lexus car to look up reviews and do your research because my experience with Lexus in the short months of owning my car have been terrible!
Of 4 Lexus autos I've owned this is my first nightmare. I've talked with dealership in Torrance, CA for over 5 hours and 9 people later; Lexus just no longer cares about their customers. They have lost being #1 in true service. We ordered this nice new RX 350 (build online) and after 60 days kept asking the dealer if he could locate sooner than a 6 month wait. Finally our salesman at Henessey reached out and said he had one but no factory tow package (jet skis). He said one could be added by them after the purchase. Many, many, many conversations later - IT CANNOT be added! Lexus changed the wiring harness in the 2016 RX 350. My dealer should have known this!!!
We are really pissed off in the dealership as well as Torrance but apologize and neither will work a trade since we have titled it, without us coming $4500 out of pocket!! This will be the last Lexus for me, we have learned (burned) our lesson. People are now whispering aftermarket but Lexus has the wiring fix, just won't step up and assign it a part number and make it available for consumers to purchase. Instead anyone wanting their "tow package" in their desired color and interior trim package better be prepared to wait because LEXUS NO LONGER CARES!! The worse 50K purchase I've ever made!
I felt like I was taken advantage of the second I drove off the lot. My negative review is based on visiting Longo Lexus May 2014, after work on a weeknight, to look at the new IS250. I went in to see if I would be able to finance the car, how much I could get for my Lexus ES 350 trade-in, and how much the monthly payment would be, and my goal was to receive a lower monthly car payment. I would've never went in the evening if I knew I wouldn't be given an honest/fair contract due to a rushed salesman.
I was referred to the lease fleet manager Sergio ** (who was interested in me leasing not buying) and he was very nice and helpful, or so I thought. While we were working on making sure my new payment was lower than my previous payment, Sergio started changing numbers that I was not aware of until two years later when I was ready to turn in my lease. My issues with my first leasing experience. While speaking with Sergio I asked for a two year lease; he wrote the contract for 27 months. I requested and paid upfront for any overage miles based on a two year lease; not a 27 month lease, so now I am way over my estimated mileage. I never agreed on a residual value for the car with Sergio.
There was very poor communication on what was being discussed versus what was being written on the contract. Unfortunately timing, feeling rushed by a salesman wanting to head home (I was taking awhile to make a decision), and having no previous knowledge of how to lease a car, I asked my questions and trusted Sergio's answers and signed the contract. Assuming everything we discussed was reflected on the contract.
Two years later April 2016, I knew my lease was coming to an end so I read up on returning a leased car. And started shopping for a new car. I went into Longo Lexus to look at cars and discuss my lease end options only to be told I have four months left on my lease. I said this has to be wrong because I signed a two year lease and made sure to buy enough mileage for two years. The salesman at Lexus said no it's 27 months. I asked him to request for a manager to call me, and no one called. Now the lease is costing an additional $1600 in unplanned monthly payments.
Around that time I was being contacted/harassed by 3 separate salespeople, calling and emailing me about my end lease options. Each one I spoke with, I explained what happened to me, I asked what they could do for me, and what I should do to correct the issue, and if they could escalate this issue to management, and make sure someone contacts me. They all claimed they would try, but I never received any contact from Longo regarding what they are going to do to help me with my lease contract. No one appears to want to help me, I would love to consider an option of returning it and paying the lease end fee and 10 cents a mile (which is what I paid upfront). I would even consider a buy option if I was given a fair residual price.
I know I should not be responsible for paying 25 cents a mile, just because a salesman wanted to give the illusion of creating a great deal/price. I think it is unfortunate that salesmen and managers do not share with consumers how the leasing process works, and all the fees associated with leasing, especially when they're talking them out of buying a car. They do not talk about how much of a pain it is to give the car back/purchase the vehicle/lease a new car. A salesman asks for trust and they want enough information to help you. The consumer gives the salesman too much information, and then the salesman uses it against them. Instead of being helpful, they're friendly so you feel like you've been given a good deal, but they of course make sure they receive the better deal.
In the past few months, I have read a lot about the leasing process, and I've asked better questions, and I understand what was done, and where everything went wrong. I would've liked Sergio to be upfront about what he was doing to get the cost down, versus doing it and thinking I'd be ok with it, just to receive a minuscule lower monthly payment. If he would've been honest with me, I would've known I was given more months in my lease and I would've purchased more miles upfront, or I would've walked. Also if I knew the buy out option was depending on how much the residual value of the car was, I would've tried to negotiate a much better price, and if the numbers didn't work, I would've said never mind, and left.
Also, if they would've said to give the car back it would cost $400+, I would've also walked. But of course Sergio knew that, and made sure not to miss out on getting a car off the lot, and made sure his time wasn't wasted, he appeased me, adjusted some numbers like magic, and the rest is history/an awful nightmare. I should've never been honest with him about what my goal was, because then I would've been given an honest price, and I would've left, because I know my finances and what I can and cannot afford.
I've been stressed out for months, trying to figure out how to pay for all of these additional screw the consumer charges, while trying to come up with more money for a down payment for a new car, so I can get to and from work. No one seems to care, they just want to screw me more, by talking buy-out, or new lease options. No one has yet to reach out to me to address my situation, as if what happened to me is just normal sales practice for all your leases. This makes me very sad, because I thought I liked Longo Lexus, and Lexus in general. I had such a great experience with my ES 350, I thought I would try out a new body style. Worst mistake I could've made. Instead of this being a great positive, referral experience, it's a stressed out, depressing, seek a therapist, experience. If someone, who is willing and able to assist me, could finally reach out to me, and discuss what I can do, I would greatly appreciate it.
I purchased an alleged 2016 lexus gs-350 from lexus of riverside on 4/29/2016. I reported a navigation defect to them in less than two weeks. They did nothing for 6 1/2 weeks and finally sent a dealership car and service tech. We drove both my car and dealership car. In "go home" mode it took us in a round-about manner to a dead end road in a different zip code. Both my car and dealership car failed and went to dead end road but I took my garmin gps in dealer car and it worked perfectly. The dealership refused to do anything and referred this problem to their lexus/toyota headquarters in Torrance, ca. The clerk at the headquarters said we would be put in a "queue" which would take 4 weeks.
I spent hours researching, driving, photographing, documenting and sending over 30 emails to them but just got a letter giving me an assignment to send them documents they already had. I also called their 800# - useless. You get some clerk who only gives a first name and never gives you a case number. I have 1 week left for the 4-week queue, so will probably have to sue them since there is no available for this serious problem and they just delay hoping you go away.
Next I photographed the navigation screen which shows that the navigation micro sd card is dated 8/1/2015 (gen 8) which according to their published literature is only for a 2015 gs-350. At this writing, the card will be 1 year old in 2 weeks and the service manager told me they usually come out around October for about $169. So either lexus sold me a 2015 and changed the date to 2016 or they are using old parts. I had leased 4 lexus ls series before - 1990, 1995, 1999 & 2004. The 2004 was terrible and constantly needed repairs. So I left lexus. But I read the glowing reports by consumer reports and tried the 2016 gs-350 due to its alleged safety features - big mistake.
I received a letter from Lexus today informing me that my two Lexus cars (IS 250 and ES 350) will be recalled at some point in the future due to a defect in the Takata Front Passenger Airbag Inflator. It said the airbag can deploy due to this defect and possibly send metal fragments through the airbag striking and possibly injuring or killing the vehicle occupant. It also said that Lexus is working on preparing a remedy and will send another notification when the remedy becomes available. Then it says "What should you do?" "Until the remedy becomes available, we recommend that you do not operate the vehicle with an occupant in the front passenger seat."
So their solution is to not have us drive with anyone in the passenger seat until some unknown time in the future (1 month? 6 months? 1 year? 2 years?), when they finally contact us to fix the defect. This is unacceptable. How are families that need to use the passenger seat to carry everyone supposed to function with this solution? They need to come up with a short time fix until the longer term problem can be resolved, e.g., remove the deadly airbag in the near term and replace it at some point in the future. We have seat belts that can protect the passenger in the meantime and the seat belt will not kill someone unexpectedly.
My impression is Lexus sent his note because they are more concerned about their legal liability if the defect occurs and less concerned about how thousands families with IS 250 or ES 350 are suppose operate day to day and never use the passenger seat until Lexus determine the best method for minimizing their costs to address this issue.
I own a 2012 Lexus CT 200h. Absolutely love my car. 2 1/2 weeks I was in a car accident that was not my fault. My car went to Lexus of the quad cities to get an estimate. While in for getting the door fixed rust was noticed on both of the front door seams. We questioned it and had to get in contact with Lexus. My husband talked to Shawn directly at Lexus. They sent someone out to look at my car. Since my car has rust on the seams they will not cover it, as it is not rusted through. Lexus warranty says corrosion or perforation for 6 years unlimited miles.
Since the door was already being painted it would not cost anymore to fix the seam under the door. Shawn told my husband nothing he could do about it and no one else he could speak to. I don't know about you but who wants to spend $40,000 on car that is only 4 years old and it's rusted. I guess I thought buying a Lexus was not buying a Ford Focus, even though I owned a Ford Focus 10 years ago and it never rusted. Customer service not good, neither is warranty.
I've been trying to resolve this issue for about 2 years now. My car dashboard has become very sticky and when it's very sunny outside, it is hard to see through the window because of the reflection from the dashboard. When I was living in South Florida, I mention this to Lexus of North Miami. They were no help and stated to me that I should be getting a letter in the mail, which never came. When I move down to Maryland, I also brought this matter to the attention of Lexus of Silver Spring and again, the individual helping me stated that I was not on the list which didn't make sense to me. I call the Lexus Customer Satisfaction number but the rep stated that I wasn't eligible. I don't understand why I wouldn't be eligible since I did purchase the car from a Certified Lexus dealership.
The driver side rear triangle window molding on my Lexus 400rx came loose and was lost on the road. Upon going to the dealership to replace the molding I was told that the entire window had to be replaced to the tune of $235. The plastic molding can easily be replaced with super glue and attached firmly if the molding was sold separately. One has to buy the entire rectangular side rear window to the tune of $235 not including installation to take care of the problem. The passenger side rear triangle window molding is flapping at 65 mph and is ready to fall off. I was told by the dealership that this is a common occurrence with the Lexus Rx series. Lexus charges you $235 plus installation for a plastic molding that at the most would cost $10 to replace.
I have the Lexus ES 350 2011 model. My FOB only opens the front door - driver's side only. The passenger side and the rear back doors do not open. When I open manually the other 3 doors (passenger and rear back doors) and I use the FOB, it locks but will not unlock. Is this a programming problem? My Lexus technician says that I should replace all three locks at a cost of $1,500.00. Please advise.
Lexus Company Profile
- Company Name:
- Lexus
- Website:
- http://www.lexus.com/


text:
Toba Tek Singh: Dacoits take away Rs 150,000, gold ornaments
TOBA TEK SINGH: A dacoity incident was reported here on Tuesday night. Jehanzeb and his family members were on their way by a car when three dacoits intercepted them near Kamalia and took away Rs 150,000, gold ornaments and other valuables.
The original article can be found at The News.
Tagged under: Crime, Crime News, Dacoits, Guarding, Kamalia, Risk Assessment, robbery, Security, The News, Toba Tek Singh


text:
DEVELOPER DIARY | PS3 Friday, March 26, 2010 | 5:48 PM
Developer Diary : Emotions in Yakuza 3
Dev Diary #3
All comments
If you can think of an old-school beat-them-up like Streets of Rage and you hope they'd make a sequel, this is as close as it gets (in gameplay terms). If you value a well-told cinematic storyline in a game, this is it. Go buy this game, we need Yakuza 4 in the west!
Posted by 3monthspWell technically there are 2p mini-games. Lol
doesn't even have co-op wich is the sole purpose of SoR. Not even by chance.
doesn't even have co-op wich is the sole purpose of SoR. Not even by chance.
SoR may have been a poor example, but there are many good beat-em ups that don't have coop like Spider man: Maximum carnage on SNES.
Spikeout was actually a spiritual successor to Streets of Rage, and Yakuza is made by the same director and developer and is based on the same combat engine. So yep, by extension this almost literally is a sequel to SoR.
Yu Suzuki and AM2 - makers of Virtua Fighter - did Shenmue. Toshihiro Nagoshi and Amusement vision - makers of Spikeout - did Yakuza.
Yakuza *is* Spikeout combat rolled into a jRPG wrapping. Spikeout *was* a spiritual successor to Streets of Rage. They even pitched SoR to Sega during that time. All of these things are facts.
Posted by 3monthspAccording to you. I don't think it is its sole purpose, as much as it might add. The combat is very alike, and that is what I'm referring to. You can do it with three other people of SoR, it doesn't change a thing that the combat is very alike.
doesn't even have co-op wich is the sole purpose of SoR. Not even by chance.
doesn't even have co-op wich is the sole purpose of SoR. Not even by chance.
About the game
- Yakuza 3
- Published by SEGA
- Developed by Ryu ga Gotoku St...
- French release: Available
- US release: Available
- Japanese release: Available
What's up?
Top stories
- Copyright 2007-2016 Gamersyde SARL
- About gamersyde - Privacy Policy
$693 of $700 per month
Log in
Gamersyde LiveNo upcoming streams
Express links
- Rockstar confirms Red Dead Redemption 2, coming Q4 2017
- inXile to launch crowdfunding campaign for Wasteland 3
- Hitman: The Complete First Season coming January 31
- Gran Turismo Sport release date delayed to 2017
- Ubisoft Motion Pictures announces "The Division" film
- Legendary to adapt Life Is Strange into digital series
- Red Dead Redemption on Xbox One Backward Compatibility
- BioShock: The Collection coming Sept. 13
- Batman: Return to Arkham delayed
- Xbox unveils Project Scorpio
- Koei Tecmo announces Berserk (working title)
- Techland officially becomes a global video game publisher
- No Man's Sky delayed to August 9
- Mass Effect: Andromeda will now ship in early 2017
- EA & Respawn developing a new Star Wars game


text:
Andersen 250 Drainable Outdoor Floor Mat - Navy - 10' Length x 3' Width
- Brand New 1 Left
- Item is brand new Original sealed packaging
List Price $114.99
Please note: BLINQ sells products in multiple conditions (new, open box, refurbished, etc). Not all reviews are reflective of the condition that you may purchase.
No reviews found
- Features
- Polypropylene fiber system dries quickly and is suitable for outdoor use
- Unique ridged construction effectively stores dirt and moisture beneath shoe level
- Exclusive rubber reinforced face nubs prevent pile from crushing in high traffic areas, thereby maintaining high performance and extending product life
- Not adversely affected by salt or ice melt
- Description
- No other mat in the industry traps water and dirt so effectively. WaterHog mats are constructed of rubber reinforced face nubs and the "waffle" design provides crush proof scraping action. Premium 24 oz/sq. anti-static Polypropylene fiber system dries quickly and won't fade or rot. When wet, the rubber reinforce surface allows water to be wicked to the bottom of the mat away from foot traffic while providing a slip resistant surface. Colorfast: Solution dyed for excellent light and we fastness. Unique ridged construction effectively stores dirt and moisture beneath shoe level.
- 096801484590
- Brand
- The Andersen Company
- Model
- Part
May We Also Suggest
How BLINQ Works
- Retailer needs to move overstock, open box & refurbished inventory.
- BLINQ receives inventory and professionally inspects each item.
- Condition is determined, with only the best items passing inspection.
- Item is heavily discounted on BLINQ.com to sell quickly.


text:
Song Of Style
Walking around LA in my current favorite casual combo. We've restocked the Two Songs rose tits tee ONE LAST TIME and there are a few left on the site …
Pink Velvet Moment in New York City (via Bloglovin.com )
Holiday party dress inspo found with this pink velvet wrap dress worn on Aimee Song
Embroidered Leather Skirt For the Office | Song of Style
My go-to outfit in L.A. is always some kind of denim but sometimes I gotta mix it up because my lazy outfit starts looking the same. I mean …
Off The Shoulder Ruffle Top in Venice, Italy | Song of Style | Bloglovin�
Palm Springs and Coachella Vibes | Song of Style | Bloglovin'
Absolutely STUNNING blog. I love Aimme Song's work! Can't wait to get my hands on her book "Capture My Style"


text:
David Tennant: "Who Is Still Mine"
David Tennant has said that he feels that Doctor Who is his until the broadcast of the new series.
Tennant is the tenth incarnation of the Doctor and he's due to be killed off in the 'End Of Time' two-parter special on Christmas Day and New Year's Day before he's resurrected as the Eleventh doctor played by Matt Smith.
Talking to BBC Newsbeat, Tennant said, "It was an emotional finish and the final story is very emotional, there was crying on and off screen. Until they broadcast, it will still feel like mine.
"I didn't know how I'd feel when they started filming again. There were photos of Matt in costume and that was the first realisation that it is going on without me. But it was actually quite exciting, I can't wait to see it."
Come Christmas time, Tennant said, "Well I will still be in it, so I will be sitting round with three or four hundred of my closest friends forcing them to watch me on television. That's what happens on Christmas Day."
Meanwhile, if you can't get enough of Tennant, why not check out our review of his latest incarnation in cartoon form


text:
PETER BURNESS: One of the nice discoveries in preparing the exhibition was to find that we have quite a lot of photographs actually taken on the 25th of April 1915. So we have about 60 or 70 of these, some are images taken by professional photographers, by the Australian official historian, but quite a lot of snapshots taken by soldiers who had cameras with them.
Well there wasn't a lot of censorship during the Gallipoli campaign. Later on, on the Western Front a soldier simply wasn't allowed to own a camera. You couldn't take a camera anywhere near the front line on the Western Front, but clearly on ANZAC, because small portable cameras were now available… pocket cameras…soldiers were carrying these with them, and taking shots, so remarkably, the Gallipoli campaign is quite well covered in photographs. This is interesting as in those days it was quite new to have photographs reproduced in the newspapers too. So this gave the newspapers opportunity to give some coverage to the campaign.
It was quite a while before the photographs appeared in Australia. Prior to that, it was mainly artists' impressions, and this is where you get the great disparity. The artists impressions were always greatly heroic of course, you know - men charging up the hills with bayonets thrust before them. The photographs show a more gritty, realistic scene, you know - of soldiers going about their day to day activities under fire.
Well, the interesting thing when we do see the first of the photographs appearing in the Australian press, they are fake photographs. They took some of the practice landings beforehand, so the first photographs we get to see in the Australian newspapers are those taken before the event of practice scenes, but a lot of those were passed off as being genuine. Later on, we get the original, genuine photographs taken under fire on the beaches and I think it just provided a sense of reality to the whole situation. A lot information was coming back to Australia from the fighting, but there was a very long lag time … you know, it was weeks and weeks after the event that you were reading about these things. One of the things that was very slow in coming back too, was the casualty figures. But when the photographs appear, they provide that sense of reality to these reports that they had been receiving.
Well, the … war on Gallipoli was relatively primitive compared to the fighting we would see later on in the Western Front - the masses of artillery, and the great war of technology in France and Belgium. Gallipoli was earlier than that … it was less artillery … it was more the rifleman with his bayonet, going into battle and you see that with the photographs. The simple infantryman with his rifle and bayonet - that's what features in the photographs, rather than masses of artillery and machine guns, and everything you saw on the Western Front … aeroplanes … and so forth. Much more simplistic view of things.
What those photographs do show us is … the conditions on Gallipoli in the first days. They were landing on a rugged shoreline … heavy vegetation … and all that was swept away later. You look at later photographs of Gallipoli and the vegetation is mainly burnt off, or stripped away during fighting. But you can see on those first days the thick vegetation was impenetrable in parts, and that contributed to the was the campaign was fought in those days
Yes, the photographs come in a bit of a series of course. You see the men getting off the boats, into smaller boats to go ashore…you see them rowing ashore [and] landing on the beach. And then, of course the next segment is the fighting in the hills and that's where the real fighting at the landing of Gallipoli took place - up in the hills, not on the beach.
But you see this progress, and of course once their fighting in the hills, they're under fire, it's much more difficult to take photographs. You do get the moments when they're in the trenches, they're opening their tins of bully beef, you know - they're waiting for the Turk, those sort of scenes - but perhaps the most interesting ones are those as they're rowing ashore.
I'm not too sure the photographs are of the quality that give us a deep insight into the soldier, most of them are of the snapshot variety, and you just get these glimpses of moments as soldiers are climbing hills, occupying trenches, eating a meal, taking up a position waiting for a Turkish counter-attack, and so forth. Later on you'll get photographs, which perhaps are more revealing, as you see the development of the trenches and the static war developing, and the positions they're taking up and the stores developing on the beach and the supplies coming in from the sea. That general way of life on ANZAC is more revealed in later photographs.
I think the interest in the photographs is that they provide the reality of the situation, as opposed to the artistic impressions. The Australian public, for weeks, was fed illustrations, artist impressions … impressions by artists who were only drawing what they'd read in the newspapers themselves, anyway - they weren't eyewitnesses. Whereas the camera, of course, is an eyewitness to the event … and you get a different perspective. You see men calmly coming ashore on the beach, as I said the real fighting was up in the hills, you see the beach becoming crowded later in the day with all the wounded as they try to evacuated them….a crisis was developing on the beach. Well of course is was not revealed in the heroic drawings of the event , but it's there in the photographs.
There was one photograph which didn't look that impressive the first look at it, because it was just a rowing boat on the sea, but it was such a good quality image that once we blew it up you really could sea the men in this boat about to reach the beach, in the very early morning … it's a classic landing at ANZAC photograph.
I think the photographs - as far as Gallipoli legend - are interesting in as much as they show to us, that the soldiers present realise they were making history that day. The fact that as they are landing under fire, they are taking photographs! Charles Bean - the official historian - in his diary even talks about as soon as he stepped on the beach he turned around, took a photograph and then made his way smartly off the beach. Just the awareness that this was a historical event, you know … this was Australia's entry into the war.
This is the full text of the interview - slightly longer than the version which went to air.


text:
The Mitt Romney aide whose profane outburst at reporters became one of the lowlights of the Republican's overseas trip is taking a break from the campaign, ABC News reported Thursday.
Rick Gorka, Romney's traveling press spokesman, vaulted to a new level of prominence after he told reporters in Poland shouting questions at Romney to "kiss my ass" and "shove it." He said they needed to "show some respect" because Romney was visiting the country's Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
The incident divided the commentariat, with some, like Jon Stewart, lampooning Gorka's temper, while others, like National Review editor, saying he had acted admirably in the face of inappropriate questioning by journalists.
Overall, Gorka got quite a bit more attention than he and the campaign would likely have wanted for the incident. He ran straight into the buzzsaw of a press corps steaming at the lack of access they were getting to the candidate, and became what all campaigns fear the most: a distraction.
An unnamed Romney aide told ABC that he is "taking some time off the trail." Another unnamed Romney aide told Politico on Friday that Gorka will return next week. Romney is currently on a swing through Colorado.
Related on HuffPost:
More:Mitt Romney Reporters Mitt Romney Media Rick Gorka Taking Break Rick Gorka Kiss My Ass Rick Gorka
Get top stories and blog posts emailed to me each day. Newsletters may offer personalized content or advertisements. Learn more


text:
Not yet reviewed by editors.
Editor's Note: Product not yet tested by editor. The following description is from the manufacturer.
The new VX3300 is the perfect choice for fashion-forward consumers who believe in keeping life simple. It offers a big splash of style in an ultra compact clamshell with changeable faceplates and a full-color internal display. Easy-to-use features provide just the right touch of technology, including a powerful speakerphone and voice-activated dialing.
For additional information on Cell Phones and product reviews, please visit our Cell Phone product guide.
PCMag may earn affiliate commissions from the shopping links included on this page. These commissions do not affect how we test, rate or review products. To find out more, read our complete terms of use.


text:
0203 113 2122 Mon-Fri 7:30am-10:00pm Sat 8:00am-5:30pmSun 2:00pm-8:00pm
Login Register
FREE Delivery
Free Delivery on UK Mainland Orders, Delivery to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Outlying Islands may Require an Extra Charge.
Titan Fuel Dispensers - Fuelmaster Bunded
United Kingdom regulations state that all fuel-dispensing tanks must be bunded. The Titan FuelMaster offers customers a complete bunded solution providing safe, lockable on-site fuel storage.
The complete FuelMaster range, including storage and dispensing tanks, have been specifically designed to answer the needs of both the commercial company with mobile transport requirements, in addition to farmers with on-site fuel storage requirements.
Recently Viewed ProductsYou haven't viewed
any items yet


text:
Darryl L. DePriest is the seventh presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed Chief Counsel for the Office of Advocacy.
Prior to joining the Small Business Administration Office of...
Before the
Washington, D.C. 20554
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Broadband Initiatives
Docket No. 090309298-9299-01
The Office of Advocacy of the U. S. Small Business Administration ("Advocacy") submits these comments to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration ("NTIA") in the above-referenced docket.(1) Advocacy commends NTIA for its efforts to ensure full public participation in the policy guidance of the Broadband Technologies Opportunities Program ("BTOP") in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA" or "Recovery Act").(2)
Advocacy first comments on Section 6001(h) of the Recovery Act and the test for whether an applicant is a socially and economically disadvantaged small business of concern as defined under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act.(3) Second, Advocacy has attached comments sent to the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") that address the development of broadband definitions for the Recovery Act programs. These comments specifically provide responses to NTIA and Rural Utilities Services' ("RUS") Question 13 which seeks input on the FCC's consultative role, certain broadband definitions, speeds, nondiscrimination obligations, network interconnection standards, other related regulatory points.(4)
Section 637 of the Small Business Act provides the definition for socially and economically disadvantaged business.(5) This definition has been subject to debate by various groups, as it may be based in part on outdated data inputs. Advocacy submits that the definition adopted for use in the Recovery Act's BTOP loan/grant program should:
(1) Allow for self-certification with respect to applicable size standards;
(2) Tailor the appropriate size standards(6) to reflect current economic conditions within the U.S. telecommunications sector; and
(3) Reflect the ultimate objective of the socially and economically disadvantaged small business program, which is the maximization of participation of this specific type of loan/grant applicant.
The Office of Advocacy is available to NTIA, RUS and FCC to provide further guidance on how the final standard can best accomplish this goal. For additional information or assistance please contact Cheryl Miller Johns of my staff at (202) 205-6949 or firstname.lastname@example.com.
In order to maximize the public benefits of the BTOP loans, Advocacy submits that the FCC's consultative role should have three main components: (1) to ensure consistency with established principles and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("The Telecom Act" or "The Act"); (7) (2) to promote competition in unserved and underserved markets; and (3) to ensure regulatory certainty for loan recipients. The Commission has the authority to fulfill these roles as the agency charged with regulating interstate and international communications in the United States.(8)
The Commission has invited interested parties to comment on the FCC's consultative role in developing rules to implement the Recovery Act's BTOP loans/grants.(9) This role complements the Commission's preexisting obligations under the Telecom Act, which directs the FCC to "promote competition" and to "secure lower prices and higher quality services" for customers. This duty should shape the agency's consideration of small business needs and final recommendations to NTIA and RUS as a consultative agency partner.(10)
There is an overarching need to ensure that the final FCC, NTIA and RUS broadband definitions are consistent with one another and with FCC practice, to reduce burdens that small telecommunications firms may face in applying for loans. Additionally, in practice, the loan/grant programs need to enable small businesses that undertake new broadband projects to receive a return on their investment so that they can further stimulate the U.S. economy.
There are specific factors related to small business involvement in the loan programs that the FCC should consider in its consultative role to assist in achieving the above-mentioned goals. First, creating technologically neutral broadband definitions that address small business needs and keep pace with innovation in the telecommunications sector is a principal step in making the loan programs successful. Second, by ensuring that small firms have the ability to compete in the provision of broadband service, the FCC will serve the public interest by expanding competition and in turn increasing coverage, driving down prices, and enhancing the quality of services offered.(11) Removing barriers to entry to the extent possible through the broadband definitional considerations will help to achieve this goal. Finally, coordinating regulatory actions and examining how future FCC rulemakings may impact these Recovery Act projects is necessary to ensure that small companies can profit and invest in future telecommunications projects.
Congress established the Office of Advocacy under Pub. L. 94-305 to represent the views of small business before Federal agencies and Congress. Advocacy is an independent office within the Small Business Administration ("SBA"), so the views expressed by Advocacy do not necessarily reflect the views of the SBA or the Administration. Part of our role under the Regulatory Flexibility Act ("RFA") is to assist agencies in understanding how regulations may impact small businesses, and to ensure that the voice of small businesses is not lost within the regulatory process.(12) Congress crafted the RFA to ensure that, while accomplishing their intended purposes, regulations did not unduly inhibit the ability of small entities to compete, innovate, or to comply with the regulation.(13) In addition, the RFA's purpose is to address the adverse effect that "differences in the scale and resources of regulated entities" has had on competition in the marketplace.(14)
Executive Order 13272 further gives small business owners a voice in the complex and confusing federal regulatory process by directing the Office of Advocacy to work closely with the agencies to ensure that the agencies properly consider the impact of their regulations on small entities.(15)
Congress laid the foundation for the definition of broadband in Section 706 of the Telecom Act by characterizing the term "advanced telecommunications capability."(16) Since the Act's passage, the Commission has built upon this definition, designating broadband as an advanced service offering with an upstream and downstream speed of 200 Kilobits per second (Kbps) or greater.(17) As a first step, the FCC must ensure that the broadband definition for the loan program is consistent with the agency's general definition of broadband.
Second, the FCC should note that the rapid innovation characteristic of the telecom sector has challenged these baseline definitions.(18) Given the pace of technology, the definition of broadband may best be described as a "moving target." Because the FCC's current classification of broadband may be outdated, the Recovery Act programs offer an opportunity to update it, building on past Commission efforts.(19) The Commission should foster the creation of a dynamic definition that incorporates their past work and recognizes that the technology in this field is advancing quickly.(20) To best complete this task, the FCC should compare its broadband definition against the requirements of Section 706 of the Telecom Act, using state, industry, and international data to support what speed and other designations constitute broadband.(21) Specifically, the Commission should evaluate whether residential and/or business customers of broadband could use the set speed to receive "high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications."(22) In developing this definition, Advocacy urges the Commission to consider the various types of broadband customers' needs, specifically those of residential and small business users.
Section 706 of the Telecom Act directs the FCC to foster the deployment of advanced telecommunications services to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.(23) Thirteen years after the Act's passage some small businesses today are still left with satellite service as their only option for advanced telecommunications capabilities.(24) To address the lack of competitive alternatives, the definition of unserved should contemplate the technology needs of small businesses and also promote competition in the provision of broadband service.
More specifically, the definition of unserved should consider speed to encourage the deployment of adequate broadband Internet service for small entities.(25) Because some small businesses rely heavily on content they may require greater bandwidth to support their operations. Faster broadband speeds will allow these small businesses to utilize video streaming, telemedicine, e-learning and other important applications.(26) In order to best understand the types of services needed to support different types of small businesses, the FCC should review data from current providers of small business services.
Small businesses also need a definition that will help to create multiple high-quality telecommunications projects in their area to expand service and ensure affordable prices.(27) The Telecom Act's competition goals further stress that the unserved definition should foster new, competitive market entrants to provide broadband service.(28) Competition among providers should be widely supported to give small firms a chance to service unserved areas and offer greater consumer choice to small business customers.(29)
Section 706 also requires the Commission to assess the level at which these advanced services are available and to accelerate deployment through the removal of barriers to infrastructure investment.(30) Similar to unserved areas, the definition for underserved areas should facilitate the provision of adequate levels of broadband service to support small business operations and spur competition among small telecommunications providers. Small Internet service providers have explained to Advocacy that the small business customers that they serve traditionally have sought service upgrades on a 6 to 9 month basis. It is important that small businesses have the ability to expand their operations so that they can reach their full potential.(31)
The Recovery Act requires that the Commission coordinate with the grant-providing agencies to publish non-discrimination principles that will become part of the contractual conditions awarded under Section 6001.(32) Advocacy believes that the FCC should build upon its past policy efforts in meeting this requirement.
In September 2005, the FCC released a policy statement to offer guidance on its approach to non-discrimination obligations related to the Internet and broadband consistent with its congressional directives in Section 230(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended(33) and in Section 706 (a).(34) Congress established that it is the policy of the United States to "preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet"(35) and "to promote the continued development of the Internet."(36) Congress further charged the FCC with supporting this policy through the reasonable and timely deployment of "advanced telecommunications capability" to "all Americans".(37) Because the FCC's four broadband policy principles(38) provide an adequate foundation to the non-discrimination policies, they should shape the contractual conditions of the BTOP grants. The network neutrality principles and the specific non-discrimination principles of the loan projects should be uniform, so that all carriers, whether loan recipients or not, are subject to the same regulatory obligations to ensure consistency.
The Recovery Act also requires the FCC to coordinate with respect to publishing network interconnection obligations as part of the contractual conditions of grants awarded.(39) Network interconnection obligations represent another important policy aspect directly tied to the success of small carrier recipients of The BTOP loans/ grants. None of the telecommunications projects funded by the Recovery Act will have the potential to flourish and provide increased connectivity at reasonable prices absent network interconnection obligations. Wireline and wireless networks need to connect to existing infrastructure. As such, the FCC's consultative role is critical in ensuring that the relevant language in the various broadband grant/loan programs addresses this need. Advocacy believes that Section 251(40) and other relevant portions of the Telecom Act lay the foundation for network interconnection obligations, and encourages the FCC to rely upon these sections in advising NTIA to further ensure consistency of policies.
Coordination of regulatory policies is important to the success of small business participation in the Recovery Act's loan/grant programs. Moreover, the need for enhanced coordination extends the FCC's consultative role beyond definitional considerations into their regulatory role established by the Telecom Act. Regulatory certainty dictates that once
selected, the loans/grants are disbursed, and the shovels are in the ground, the Commission needs to focus on factors that will support the long-term success of the new telecommunications projects. Advocacy believes that the FCC's policies can and should support the success of new market entrants so that they can innovate and invest in small business.
To accomplish this goal, the Commission should consider these various loan projects and how FCC regulatory actions may have an impact on small firm recipients of the BTOP loans as they move forward with relevant rulemakings. This will ensure that the small companies that have undertaken difficult build-out projects have a meaningful opportunity to secure a return on the investments they make and further stimulate the economies in their area with future projects and job opportunities.
To ensure that that Congress' goals in promoting competition via the Telecom Act and the Recovery Act are fully realized, Advocacy urges the FCC to focus on harmonizing the broadband definitions in the loan programs and in overarching FCC policy. Additionally, Advocacy believes that the definitions need to address speed in a way that takes into account the needs of small business customers in addition to residential customers. Finally, Advocacy encourages the creation of language that will reduce entry barriers and the establishment of regulatory actions that will allow new entrants to build, maintain, expand and upgrade their networks. This will provide the competition that the U.S. telecommunications market needs to improve the quantity and quality of broadband service in an efficient manner throughout unserved and underserved areas in the United states. The Office of Advocacy is available to assist the Commission in its outreach to small business or in its consideration of the impact upon them. For additional information or assistance, please contact me or Cheryl Miller Johns of my staff at (202) 205-6949 or firstname.lastname@example.com.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ ___________________________
Shawne Carter McGibbon
Acting Chief Counsel for Advocacy
/s/ ___________________________
Cheryl M. Johns
Assistant Chief Counsel for Telecommunications
Office of Advocacy
U.S. Small Business Administration
409 3rd Street, S.W.
Suite 7800
Washington, DC 20416
April 13, 2009
Bernadette McGuire-Rivera, Associate Administrator, Office of Telecommunications and Information Applications
David P. Grahn, Associate General Counsel, Rural Development
Kevin Neyland, Acting Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
via electronic filing
Certificate of Service
I, Cheryl M. Johns, an attorney with the Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, certify that I have, on this April 13, 2009, caused to be mailed, first-class, postage prepaid, a copy of the foregoing Comments to the following:
/s/ _________________________
Cheryl M. Johns
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program
U.S. Department of Commerce
Room 4812
1401 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20230
Kevin Neyland,
Acting Administrator
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Office of Management and Budget
725 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20503


text:
The Trashman: Give It All to Him Paperback
Give It All to Him
by Max Lucado;
Stock available
Price and PurchaseOffer price: £1.99 Go to Basket
If you're buying for a church, school or business, why not Buy Now Pay Later?Find Out More
The Trashman: Give It All to Him
Full Product Description
This story, excerpted from Next Door Savior, will become the Easter giveaway book for churches next spring�in the vein of He Did This Just for You.
In this story a woman gives her garbage of shame to the trashman; an old man hands over his heavy bag of regrets. Hundreds walk to the landfill and find it filled with trash.
�Give it to me. Tomorrow. At the landfill. Will you bring it?� He rubs a moist smudge from her cheek with his thumb and stands. "Friday. The landfill.�
�You can�t live with this," he explains. "You weren�t made to.�
For individuals and churches, here is a beautiful story of a Savior who can take all our garbage on his shoulders�and amazingly, still stand!
In addition to this story, Max explains in easy-to-understand language what Christ did for us and how to turn in our old baggage and exchange it for new life in him.
The Trashman: Give It All to Him by Max Lucado was published by Thomas Nelson in January 2004 and is our 2782nd best seller. The ISBN for The Trashman: Give It All to Him is 9780849944789.
Reviews of The Trashman: Give It All to Him
Customer reviews and testimonials Write a review
Product Q&A
Got a question? No problem! Just click here to ask us about The Trashman: Give It All to Him.
Related Departments
This product is also listed in the following departments:
- Max Lucado department under Allegory
- Christian Publishers department under Thomas Nelson
If you like this you may also like...
Shaped by Grace
When Christ Comes
Details for The Trashman: Give It All to Him
|Page last updated
|20th March 2016
|Author / Artist
|Max Lucado
|Book Format
|Thomas Nelson (January 2004)
|Number of Pages
|5 mm
|161 mm
|171 mm
|Product Code


text:
FREE SHIPPING to Home or Store
No Minimum Order
50% Off
Original $59.99 Price Details
Want to connect your GPS to your PC but don't have a 9-pin serial port connection? This cable will get you hooked. Using this converter cable and the PC interface cable for your unit, you can transfer maps, waypoints, routes and tracks between MapSource and your GPS.
Note: The drivers for this product are not compatible in a 64-bit environment.
Compatible products for this item are:
Garmin eTrex
Garmin GPS
Garmin GPSMAP
Garmin StreetPilot
|Other Cables
The West Advisor articles have answered boaters' questions and provided solutions to boating problems for more than 20 years. West Marine has compiled one of the Web's most comprehensive collections of technical boating information articles.


text: Helio Introduces Sidekick Killer The new Helio Ocean is a dual-slider messaging phone that finally sets the "MySpace carrier" apart. VIEW ALL PHOTOS IN GALLERY ORLANDO Social-networking-focused wireless carrier Helio released its first truly stunning new phone today at the CTIA trade show, a device called the Ocean which could beat the T-Mobile Sidekick at its messaging game. VIEW ALL PHOTOS IN GALLERY Up until now, Helio has been known more for youthful attitude and its MySpace relationship than for ground-breaking phones. While all four of Helio's phonesthe Hero, the Kickflip, the Drift, and the Heathave been exclusive to Helio, they've all fit well into the mainstream of phone technology in the US. The Ocean, on the other hand, pushes envelopes. If it works well, it's the kind of phone you'd switch carriers for: a true messaging maven that brings together e-mail, IM, and MySpace in an elegant device that will satisfy pretty much everyone from ages 15 to 30, whether they're in school or have an actual job. Built by Korean manufacturer Pantech to Helio's specs, the Ocean is a 4.33-by-2.2-by-.86-inch oval weighing 5.61 oz. Slide the keypad down and it looks like a standard slider phone. Slide it sideways and it has a full keyboard for messaging. Internet access here seems excellent. For e-mail, the Ocean supports POP3/IMAP, Microsoft Exchange corporate e-mail, and various popular freemail accounts, including Yahoo! Mail and Gmail. AIM, Yahoo!, and Windows Live Messenger IM clients are built innot to mention MySpace. The Ocean's contact list syncs with AOL, Yahoo!, Helio Mail, and Exchange, and shows IM presence information in the contact list. For Web browsing, you have a full Web browserno more WAP!along with an updated MySpace client and the ability to do "multi-headed" searches of Google, Yahoo!, and Wikipedia right from the gadget's home screen. Music-wise, it supports Microsoft Windows DRM, including subscription files from Yahoo! and Napster. Macs can play too, with the Ocean's 200MB of internal storage and up-to-4GB MicroSD card slot appearing as a USB hard drive on Mac desktops, and the music player supporting unprotected AAC music from iTunes. You can listen to music through wired or stereo Bluetooth wireless headphones. Related Sony's Mylo Aims at Sidekick with Portable IM Sony's Mylo Aims at Sidekick with Portable IM Helio's Hybrid Sends a Mixed Message Helio's Hybrid Sends a Mixed Message Hands-On With the Helio Ocean Hands-On With the Helio Ocean There's a lot more here, too. Built-in GPS lets the Ocean fire up Google Maps or Helio's own Buddy Beacon application (which shows where your Helio-toting friends are on a map.) A 2-megapixel camera comes with a new application that GPS-tags your photos and uploads them to Helio's photo Web site. And like all Helio phones, the Ocean uses Sprint's high-speed EV-DO network, which is about five times as fast as the T-Mobile Sidekick 3's EDGE connection. I'm excited about the Ocean because it finally seems to fulfill Helio's promiseto deliver new phones with new software that make us think about messaging in new ways. Phone interfaces are broken and annoying, and if the Ocean can show a new way to do comprehensive, integrated messaging, it can push the whole industry forward (and possibly win a lot of clients over to Helio.) Helio is really good at pitching products, and I haven't laid my hands on an Ocean yetwait for a full report tomorrow. If this thing lives up to its promises, it will send competing messaging phones like the LG enV and Samsung U740 on Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile's Sidekick 3 running for cover. The Ocean will go on sale this spring for $295. Complete CTIA Show Coverage VIEW ALL PHOTOS IN GALLERY VIEW ALL PHOTOS IN GALLERY


text:
[inshuheki] Uchuu Kyoudai - 08 [6A899081].mkv
Torrent Description
The torrent has 1 files, total 331.0MB, created at Feb. 09, 2015.
Torrent Tags
Happy? Share it!
Download Link
Download Infomation
The torrent has been downloaded 105 times, the speed is bad.
Torrent Contents ( 1 files)
[inshuheki] Uchuu Kyoudai - 08 [6A899081].mkv331.0MB
You May Be Interested In:


text:
Spotlight : Get Creative Make it Crafty
Spotlight Catalogue 7 – 24 December 2016 – Do you know what's in and what's hot in the Spotlight australia for this week? If you haven't, using the store's weekly advertisements will be your great guide.
Current Spotlight online catalogue valid until 7/12/2016 – 24/12/2016 Knockout Deals;
Through the spotlight sale customers be on track of the week-by-week move of your favorite Spotlight stores and you will be updated with the weekly status of Spotlight products such as spotlight blinds, spotlight curtains, spotlight costumes, spotlight fabric, spotlight bayswater,spotlight rugs, spotlight jobs, and a whole lot
Read Another Spotlight Catalogues:
|Spotlight Catalogue
|Information Link
|Spotlight Catalogue 7 - 24 December 2016 [Hot Spot Sale]
|Spotlight Catalogue 7 - 24 December 2016 [VIP Club]
|Spotlight Catalogue 7 - 24 December 2016 [Get Creative]
Find amazing prices in the latest Spotlight catalogue for your favorite local store. Always check your local catalogue as it may not have all the deals and items.