text:
Everywhere I turn, life feels big. I'm hearing the same from my friends—big struggles, and lots of them. When I speak at events, women share their burdens with tears in their eyes. And almost every day, I open an email with a story that breaks my heart. It's everywhere. It's everyone.
The heat has been turned up.
I'm not one who believes the Enemy is behind every bad day or tough situation. He doesn't deserve that much credit or attention. But I do believe that evil is alive and active, and we are embracing it more than turning from it. Rather than peace, there is deep-seeded anger. Instead of collaboration there is division. Where is our empathy? Where is grace and mercy? When are we going to give each other permission to be different without considering it a threat to who we are?
Where is our civility? Our commonality? Our country?
Everything feels different. Here's what I mean…
Never in my lifetime has our country been so polarized during an election season. It has overwhelmed our sense of hope. Name calling. Lies. Scandals. Dirty tricks. Immorality. The political climate has left us emotionally and mentally exhausted. And angry. It's become an us against them mentality, and it's left us divided in heart and mind. When the other candidate's shortcomings are exposed, we celebrate. We cheer. And we point fingers and jeer.
How did we get to this place?
The truth is, hate is so real and so close. It's not terrorists in 3rd world countries that scare us as much as people in our own communities who condemn our faith. It's becoming more and more unpopular to align ourselves with Jesus because many consider His teachings narrow-minded and offensive. Wait, what? His entire message is love.
How did everything get this twisted?
We are also watching churches redefine faith—adding to and subtracting from the Bible—and ignoring the Holy Word of God as a finished and complete work. It's a scary reality, really. Then there are leaders in the faith who are watering down the Truth, and even scarier… we are enamored with them.
Christian celebrity has gotten out of hand and if we're not careful, we risk following them into beliefs that are not godly. They are human and fallible. They don't have special access to God, or hold divine secrets not available to us, nor does God love them more than He loves you and me.
Why are we hanging on their every word?


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
February 4, 2008
GAIL FABRIKANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO., INC.; JOHN P. WOODS COMPANY, INC.; JOHN P. WOODS, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF JOHN P. WOODS COMPANY, INC., AND JOHN P. WOODS, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF JOHN P. WOODS COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-4417-04.
Submitted October 31, 2007
Before Judges Axelrad, Payne and Messano.
Plaintiff Gail Fabrikant appeals from the July 10, 2006, order granting summary judgment to defendants Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (Gallagher), John P. Woods Company (the Company), John P. Woods, Jr. (John Woods), and John P. Woods, III (Jay Woods), and dismissing plaintiff's complaint. She contends the "trial court overstepped its authority by making numerous findings of material fact where those facts were in clear dispute, and by resolving all inferences in favor of the moving party, instead of [her]."
In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we use the same standard employed by the trial court. Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. v. Hillside Bottling Co., 387 N.J. Super. 224, 230 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 189 N.J. 104 (2006). We decide first whether there was a genuine issue of material fact; if not, we then decide "whether the motion judge's application of the law was correct." Id. at 230-31. We apply the standards articulated by the Supreme Court in Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 142 N.J. 520, 540 (1995).
[A] determination whether there exists a "genuine issue" of material fact that precludes summary judgment requires the motion judge to consider whether the competent evidential materials presented, when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, are sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of the non-moving party.
We must assume the non-moving party's version of the facts as true and give that party the benefit of all favorable inferences available in the record. Id. at 536.
In her complaint, plaintiff alleged: 1) defendants subjected her to a hostile work environment "[b]ased upon her . . . Jewish faith," in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 through -42 (the LAD); 2) retaliated against her because she engaged in protected activity under the LAD; and 3) that John Woods and Jay Woods aided and abetted Gallagher and the Company in its discriminatory conduct. She alleged that as a result of these discriminatory practices, she was terminated from her employment as a senior administrative officer with the company, and she sought compensatory and punitive damages, "appropriate equitable relief," reasonable attorney's fees, and costs.
The facts in the motion record viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff disclose that the Company was a reinsurance brokerage firm located in Jersey City, New Jersey, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gallagher, an insurance brokerage company with its principal place of business in Illinois. John Woods was the founder and chairman of the Company, and his son, Jay Woods, was its president.
On October 16, 2002, plaintiff was hired as vice-president and senior administrative officer and her official duties were to commence on January 1, 2003. Plaintiff was to be trained in the Company's procedures and policies for the remainder of the year by Josephine A. Hoey, who was retiring and to whose position plaintiff was succeeding. Plaintiff understood that as of January 1, 2003, she would assume responsibility for the Company's human resources department, other administrative functions, and liaison duties with Gallagher regarding human resource-related issues, and that she would be reporting directly to Jay Woods.
However, on her first day on the job, plaintiff was told by a co-worker that Hoey would remain working for the Company in a limited capacity on special projects after January 1. In depositions, plaintiff testified that she was "surprised" and "disappointed" to learn that Hoey was not leaving the company entirely as of the start of the new year.
Plaintiff believed Hoey was upset because she was taking over her position, and noted that Hoey "didn't make [the transition] easy." Plaintiff also believed that Hoey was not training her properly, and by mid-November 2002, the training stopped. When Hoey was on vacation during the Christmas holiday, plaintiff took all of the Company's human resource files out of Hoey's office and moved them to her own office, prompting Hoey to complain to Jay Woods that plaintiff had "stolen" the files.
Despite these tensions, plaintiff testified she had a great relationship with Hoey and John Woods. Woods himself, however, testified in his deposition that Hoey would complain to him at least once a week about plaintiff giving her a difficult time during the transition. Plaintiff maintained her relationship with John Woods was very positive during this time and she frequently had lunch with him and spoke to him regularly regarding work-related issues.
Plaintiff testified that a critical incident occurred on January 7, 2003, when Hoey came to her, unsolicited, and told her that John Woods "call[ed] blacks 'niggers' and [was] an anti-Semite who hate[d] Jews," and that he would not work with either African-Americans or Jews. Plaintiff claimed that she responded to these comments by telling Hoey she was Jewish, and that Hoey was surprised.
Plaintiff alleged that Hoey also told her that an African-American candidate had applied for plaintiff's position but Hoey knew John Woods would never work directly with her because of her race. Hoey claimed she did not forward the application for further review because of this. Plaintiff further testified that Hoey told her that she was not allowed to hire African-American males at all.
Plaintiff acknowledged that no one at the Company ever asked her if she was Jewish, that she never told John Woods or Jay Woods that she was Jewish, and that she did not indicate by her outward behavior, such as taking off for a Jewish holiday or wearing a Star of David at work, that she was of the Jewish faith.
Plaintiff did not know whether Hoey ever told John or Jay Woods she was Jewish, but claimed that after her disclosure to Hoey she was treated differently. She claimed that John Woods and Hoey stopped communicating with her except through memos sent to plaintiff through Jay Woods.
Plaintiff acknowledged that several employees told her that Hoey was mean-spirited, vengeful, and untrustworthy. Plaintiff testified that Hoey was rude to others, that John Woods had displayed a bad temper toward other employees, and that both had tried to "destroy" other employees. Plaintiff admitted she had not witnessed, nor was she aware of any anti-Semitic comments made by John Woods. She was also unaware of any conduct or other complaints regarding John Woods's allegedly discriminatory behavior, although she learned that a prior employee had filed a lawsuit against the Company because John Woods allegedly ridiculed him for being obese.
Nevertheless, plaintiff concluded that the sudden iciness in the relationship between Hoey, John Woods, and herself was due to Hoey's knowledge of her faith and her belief that Hoey had told Woods she was Jewish. When asked why she concluded that John Woods would not interact with her because she was Jewish, plaintiff replied "[b]ecause there was no other reason for him to speak to me or treat me the way he did."
On January 23, 2003, plaintiff reported Hoey's statements about John Woods's alleged bigotry, and the mistreatment she was receiving from Hoey and Woods to Eleanor Maddy, senior vice-president of the Company. However, plaintiff did not tell Maddy that she was Jewish, nor did plaintiff complain that Woods or Hoey were treating her rudely because of her faith. She did, however, tell Maddy that there were "EEO violations" at the company, and Maddy acknowledged there were.
Plaintiff testified that Maddy told her that John Woods was indeed a bigot but that if she complained, both she and plaintiff could lose their jobs. Plaintiff also claimed Maddy was aware that Hoey disqualified a potential applicant to succeed her based upon her race.*fn1
Plaintiff spoke to Jay Woods about the tension between herself, Hoey, and John Woods in late January. Jay Woods was sympathetic, acknowledged the problem, and told plaintiff he would try to resolve it. Plaintiff never told Jay Woods that she was Jewish, or that she believed some of the problems were the result of either Hoey's or John Woods's religious bias.
On February 6, 2003, John Woods sent a memorandum to Jay Woods discussing his disappointment with plaintiff's work performance and recommending her termination. The memorandum also indicates the elder Woods's intention to discuss the issue directly with Elizabeth Brinkerhoff, Gallagher's director of human resources.
In late February 2003, plaintiff visited Gallagher's home office in Illinois and met with Brinkerhoff and eight other Gallagher personnel. Plaintiff did not discuss her belief that she was being subjected to discriminatory conduct at any time during these meetings because she feared reprisals and because Jay Woods had earlier told her never to report anything to Brinkerhoff regarding Hoey or John Woods.
On March 3, 2003, plaintiff provided a three-page single-spaced memorandum to Jay Woods containing numerous complaints about John Woods and Hoey. Jay Woods forwarded a copy to Brinkerhoff. In this memorandum, plaintiff stated that her conflict with John Woods resulted directly from her difficulties with Hoey. Nowhere in the memo did plaintiff mention her religion or indicate her belief that Hoey's or Woods's behavior was based upon her religion. Brinkerhoff called plaintiff regarding this memorandum and plaintiff complained about mistreatment, but did not mention religious discrimination or harassment. Plaintiff also contacted Linda Platzer, the recruiter who placed her at the Company, at least eight times during her term of employment to complain that she felt like she was being set up to be fired, but she never complained to Platzer that she was being discriminated against because she was Jewish.
On April 22, 2003, Jay Woods and Maddy met with plaintiff to discuss her six-month performance evaluation. During the meeting, Woods expressed concern about plaintiff's ability to act in a senior management role due to her lack of "dedicated effort" to get along with his father, and the potential difficulty she would have getting along with the senior management of any future merger candidates. Woods also felt plaintiff's inability to get along with his father and Hoey was proving a costly expenditure of his time. He was also critical of plaintiff's interaction with other Company employees.
Plaintiff left the meeting and attempted to call Brinkerhoff but was unable to reach her. Outside the meeting room, she claimed Maddy confirmed that the negative review items were merely excuses to fire her. When plaintiff re-entered the meeting, Woods told her that if she had not written the March 3 memorandum, he would have simply "told [her] there [was] a chemistry problem between [her] and [his] father and to find [he]rself another job." Plaintiff responded, "I know what this is all about," and Woods told her to "keep [her] mouth shut."
Plaintiff, Jay Woods, and Maddy met again on April 24, 2003, to discuss her review. Plaintiff expressed her belief that the April 22 meeting was a sham, that she was being fired, and that she intended to consult an attorney. Plaintiff reiterated her request for a severance package, something she initially raised as a possibility in her March memorandum. Plaintiff then gave her building pass and an update on all of her outstanding work to Woods and Maddy. At no point did Jay Woods or Maddy tell plaintiff that she was terminated.
The next day, April 25, 2003, plaintiff did not return to work. Maddy, Jay Woods, and plaintiff, however, did speak on the phone. Jay Woods told plaintiff that he wanted to finish her performance review. Plaintiff rejected this request and declined to have further any discussions without an attorney present.
Plaintiff did not return to work. Although she testified that she believed she was fired, and that Maddy confirmed to her that she was indeed being terminated, Maddy testified that she believed plaintiff had resigned. Plaintiff acknowledged that Woods never terminated her employment, but that she assumed he was firing her.
It was undisputed that Gallagher had adopted an anti-discrimination policy that required any complaints regarding discriminatory or harassing conduct to be reported to the head of human resources. Plaintiff acknowledged that she was aware of the policy and that reacting to any such complaint with the Company was part of her job responsibilities. It is undisputed that she never lodged any complaint with anyone at either company in which she claimed that the conditions in the workplace were as a result of her being Jewish.
Plaintiff also disputed the authenticity of John Wood's February 6, 2003, memorandum in which he criticized plaintiff's performance. Plaintiff employed a forensic computer expert who opined that the memo was in fact not produced on that date. In his testimony, Jay Woods explained that he wanted to make sure he had a clean copy of the memorandum because he had handwritten notes on the original. However, his secretary could not locate the memorandum on the computer system, so he asked her to retype it verbatim from his copy without his notations on April 25, 2003.
The deposition testimony from other employees at the Company indicates that contrary to allegations made by John Woods in his memorandum, they generally had no complaints regarding plaintiff's work. However, these employees also revealed that they had difficulties dealing with Hoey. John DiBlanda, the CFO of the Company, who is not Jewish, testified that he did not have a good relationship with Hoey and, as a result, felt he received a performance review that decreased his bonus. Jane Cameron, the non-Jewish former secretary to plaintiff and Hoey, testified that Hoey was rude to everybody regardless of religion.
Defendants moved for summary judgment and the motion was argued before Judge Richard J. Donohue on June 23, 2006. In a comprehensive written opinion dated July 10, 2006, Judge Donohue set forth plaintiff's factual assertions as we have above. He concluded that with respect to plaintiff's hostile work environment claim, plaintiff was "not subject to the 'extreme' conduct necessary to create an actionable hostile work environment." He noted that plaintiff admitted that "despite John Woods'[s] refusal to work or interact with her, she was able to do her job and get her work done."
In considering plaintiff's disparate treatment claim, Judge Donohue concluded that her "proofs . . . did not rise to the level of a prima facie showing . . . because plaintiff failed to establish a discriminatory motive." He noted plaintiff's inability to attribute any direct anti-Semitic remark or behavior to Hoey, John Woods, or Jay Woods, plaintiff's failure to ever complain to anyone in the Company or Gallagher about her suspicions, and plaintiff's admission that Hoey and Woods were rude toward other non-Jewish employees.
Judge Donohue also found that plaintiff had not been constructively discharged from employment with the Company. The judge first observed that plaintiff was never terminated by Jay Woods, but, rather tendered her building pass and refused to come back to continue her review. He noted, "The standard for constructive discharge 'requires more egregious conduct than that sufficient for a hostile work environment claim,'" citing Shepherd v. Hunterdon Development Ctr., 174 N.J. 1, 28 (2002). Since plaintiff failed to establish a hostile workplace claim, she had also failed to establish a claim for retaliatory discharge.
The judge determined that plaintiff's claim of retaliation under the LAD also must fail because in her March 3, 2003, memorandum, plaintiff made "complaints about unfair treatment in general," and had not "complain[ed] about discriminatory conduct." Lastly, Judge Donohue concluded that since plaintiff failed to establish a violation under the LAD, her claim that John and Jay Woods aided and abetted the Company in its discriminatory conduct must also fail. He dismissed plaintiff's complaint and this appeal ensued.
Before us, plaintiff contends that material facts were in dispute, particularly whether the conduct of Hoey and John Woods was motivated by discriminatory animus, and whether her attempts to address the hostile work environment through her memo to Jay Woods led to the Company's retaliatory conduct and her ultimate constructive discharge. We have considered these arguments in light of the motion record and applicable legal standards. We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Donohue. We add these comments.
Plaintiff's assertion that the trial judge resolved these important disputed material facts in favor of the defendants is misplaced. Rather, plaintiff's proofs, even when viewed through the appropriate summary judgment prism, failed to establish a prima facie claim of discrimination under the LAD.
To prevail on a hostile work environment claim, a plaintiff must show: "the complained-of conduct (1) would not have occurred but for the employee's gender, religion, race, or ethnicity; . . . (2) was severe or pervasive enough to make (3) a reasonable [plaintiff] believe that (4) the conditions of employment are altered and the working environment is hostile or abusive." Lehmann v. Toys 'R' Us, Inc., 132 N.J. 587, 603 (1993); see also, Cutler v. Dorn, 390 N.J. Super. 238, 250-51 (App. Div.) (applying the Lehmann standard to hostile work environment claims based on religion), certif. granted, 192 N.J. 595 (2007). Here, plaintiff's proofs as to both the first and second prongs were legally insufficient.
The first prong of the Lehmann analysis, whether the protected characteristic was the cause of the harassment, is the "defining element" of a hostile work environment claim. Herman v. Coastal Corp., 348 N.J. Super. 1, 20 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 173 N.J. 363 (2002). When the alleged harassing conduct itself is not directed to the plaintiff's race, gender, or in this case, religion, then "[a]ll that is required is a showing that it is more likely than not that the harassment occurred because of the plaintiff's [religion]." Lehmann, supra, 132 N.J. at 605. In this case, plaintiff could have met this burden by demonstrating that she was singled out for Hoey's and Woods's rude and disparaging treatment, but employees who were not Jewish were spared. Such proof would have created the inference that the hostility was based upon her religion. Ibid.
However, the record reveals just the opposite. Hoey and John Woods were known throughout the company as generally nasty and rude. Other employees who were not Jews had felt their wrath. Plaintiff's proof as to the "but-for" connection between her religion and the allegedly hostile environment was one conversation she had with Hoey in which she acknowledged she was Jewish, and a change in how she was treated shortly thereafter. However, this inference cannot withstand the undisputed fact that plaintiff could not establish that anyone, except Hoey, knew she was Jewish. Plaintiff, in her numerous meetings with Brinkerhoff, Maddy, and others, and in her March 3, 2003, memorandum, never mentioned that she was Jewish, much less that she was being subjected to religious discrimination. In short, she never made any contemporaneous complaint that linked the manifestation of the Company's allegedly discriminatory conduct to her religion.
Nor did plaintiff's proofs establish that the conditions of employment had become "sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment." Heitzman v. Monmouth County, 321 N.J. Super. 133, 147 (App. Div. 1999). "An employment discrimination law such as the LAD is not intended to be 'a general civility code' for conduct in the workplace." Ibid. (quoting Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 788, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 2283-84, 141 L.Ed. 2d 662, 677 (1998)). Here, plaintiff acknowledged that despite the cold shoulder she received from Hoey and John Woods, she was still able to perform her duties on a daily basis.
Additionally, plaintiff's failure to adhere to Gallagher's anti-discrimination policy also undercuts her hostile work environment claim. Plaintiff was not only required to report any discriminatory acts but was also charged with the duty to enforce that policy. Defendants are entitled to assert the existence of an effective policy as an affirmative defense to liability for harassment. Gaines v. Bellino, 173 N.J. 301, 320 (2002). In short, for a myriad of reasons, plaintiff failed to establish a claim for a discriminatory hostile work environment based upon her religion.
Plaintiff likewise failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment based upon her religion. To prevail on such a claim, a plaintiff must show 1) she belongs to a protected class; 2) she was performing her job at a level that met her employer's legitimate expectations; 3) she suffered an adverse employment action; and 4) others not within the protected class did not suffer similar employment actions. Maher v. New Jersey Transit, 125 N.J. 455, 480-81 (1991).
Plaintiff's claims of disparate treatment relate to the manner in which Hoey and John Woods treated her after January 7, 2003, her critical evaluation in April, and her alleged termination immediately thereafter. For reasons already expressed, plaintiff's complaint about how she was treated by Hoey and Woods would be insufficient to establish she suffered an adverse employment action. We have also held "that an unfavorable evaluation, unaccompanied by a demotion or similar action, is insufficient." El-Sioufi v. St. Peter's University Hosp., 382 N.J. Super. 145, 170 (App. Div. 2005). Therefore, plaintiff's claim rests upon her alleged termination from the company.
However, plaintiff's own testimony was that she was not terminated but, rather she assumed she was going to be fired. She contends that she was constructively discharged. Constructive discharge occurs only when an "employer knowingly permits[s] conditions of discrimination in employment so intolerable that a reasonable person subject to them would resign." Meunch v. Twp. of Haddon, 255 N.J. Super. 288, 302 (App. Div. 1992). It requires a showing "more egregious [ ] than that sufficient for a hostile work environment claim." Shepard v. Hunterdon Development Ctr., 174 N.J. 1, 28 (2002). The employer's conduct must be "outrageous, coercive[,] and unconscionable." Ibid. In determining whether a constructive discharge occurred, we consider the nature of the harassment, whether the employee resorted to internal grievance procedures, the responsiveness of the employer to any grievances made, and all other relevant circumstances. Ibid.; Woods-Pirozzi v. Nabisco Foods, 290 N.J. Super. 252, 276 (App. Div. 1996). Plaintiff's proofs were clearly insufficient to demonstrate a constructive discharge.
Plaintiff's LAD retaliation claim was also unavailing because the complaints to Jay Woods in her March 3, 2003, memorandum, and those to Maddy and Brinkerhoff, never intimated she was Jewish or associated the negative treatment she was allegedly receiving with her religion. Under the LAD, it is unlawful "[f]or any person to take reprisals against any person because that person has opposed any practices or acts forbidden [by the LAD] or because that person has filed a complaint, testified or assisted in any proceedings [under the LAD] . . . ." N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d). To establish a prima facie case of retaliation, plaintiff must show that 1) she engaged in a protected activity known to defendant; 2) she was thereafter subject to an adverse employment decision; and 3) there was a causal link between the two. El-Sioufi, supra, 382 N.J. Super. at 175. Engaging in the protected activity known to the retaliator is the central element of the claim. Young v. Hobart West Group, 385 N.J. Super. 448, 465-66 (App. Div. 2005). Protected activity can include a plaintiff's complaints concerning allegations of discrimination against herself or others; however, complaints about unfair treatment do not suffice. Barber v. CSX Distribution Servs., 68 F.3d 694, 701-02 (3d Cir. 1995).
Plaintiff failed to establish that she engaged in a protected activity because she never complained about religious discrimination to anybody at the Company or Gallagher. The complaints about her tense relationship with Hoey and John Woods were not protected activity. As a result, her claim of discriminatory retaliation under the LAD was properly dismissed.
In light of the above, plaintiff's claim that John and Jay Woods aided and abetted the Company or Gallagher in violating the LAD must also fail.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Flower Invitation
Download beautiful flowers vector invitation with floral scroll, banner with copy space for your message and halftone dots. Free vector spring and summer graphics with flower, plants and decoration elements in Illustrator AI and EPS formats for your web, blog and print projects.
This File Appears In Searches For
Circles flower plants ribbon dots halftone Swirls Trendy scroll elegance Plant vector Flower graphics
Users Who Downloaded This File Also Downloaded
Users who downloaded this file also searched for
Flower Invitation


text:
Having unwanted fat in various areas of your body can have a substantial impact on your health and self-confidence. While standard weight loss through workout and diet plan is a fantastic method to reduce weight in general, even the very best workouts cannot target problem locations like the belly, inner thighs, arms, and butts. Liposuction is a time tested treatment that is utilized to get rid of excess fat from particular areas of the body, permitting an individual to form and contour their body to their liking. Is liposuction right for you? Discover now.
Pros of Liposuction
There are many advantages to this cosmetic procedure, consisting of:
• Instantly obvious modifications. Unlike standard weight reduction, liposuction produces modifications that are immediately visible in the body. Some difference is visible right away, and the preferred results are typically accomplished in just a few days.
• Proven and safe. This cosmetic procedure has been performed by experienced cosmetic surgeons all over the world for many years and the technique has been improved over and once again to be safe and reliable.
• Healing time is generally fast. The downtime needed after having this kind of treatment is normally much less than exactly what is needed for other types of cosmetic procedures, including tummy tucks, breast reduction, and more. People who have had the treatment can often return to work much more rapidly than they anticipated and can get back to living a healthy, active lifestyle.
• Weight loss can be permanent. With the ideal upkeep techniques, the fat that was removed throughout the liposuction treatment will not return.
• Complete control over your body. With liposuction, an individual can have complete control over how they want to look, beyond exactly what traditional diet and exercise can offer. Providing people this power over their bodies increases self-esteem and help individuals feel their very best.
While there many advantages to liposuction, there are naturally a few cautions that must be considered before making the final decision to move forward with the procedure.
Cons of Liposuction
Before having actually liposuction done, it is essential to examine the possible downsides of the treatment and determine if the advantages exceed the risks in your certain case. Your cosmetic surgeon can assist you learn more about the risks associated with the treatment and can assist you decide if moving on is the best thing for you.
• Issues with general anesthesia. Due to the fact that liposuction is carried out under basic anesthesia, the procedure brings the very same dangers as any other type of surgery where basic anesthesia is utilized. Hidden medical conditions might increase these dangers.
• Negative responses. Bruising, bleeding, and discomfort are all to be anticipated, nevertheless, in uncommon cases can trigger more considerable issues.
• The potential to acquire the weight back. After having liposuction done, it is crucial to preserve a healthy diet plan and exercise appropriately as advised by your physician. Failure to do so might cause acquiring back the weight that was lost or possibly much more.
Although there are dangers associated with liposuction, for many individuals, the advantages far surpass them. Educate yourself about the procedure by having in-depth discussions with your cosmetic surgeon and consider how liposuction has the prospective to affect you as an unique individual. Only you and your cosmetic surgeon can determine if liposuction will provide you with the outcomes you are searching for within your expectations.
Laser Liposuction procedure is a new non invasive procedure to loose unwanted bodyfat in Pocopson PA
Laser liposuction is a newer, minimally invasive treatment that involves heating the fat cells to melting point and eliminating the melted fat through a little cannula. The treatment is normally done right in your doctor's workplace and is an outstanding choice for individuals who have less than 500 ml of fat to get rid of from any one location. Laser liposuction can be a safe, complementary treatment to weight reduction in order to shape the body you have actually always wanted.
Contact a Specialist in your Pocopson PA today.
If you're considering liposuction as a weight-loss option, it is very important that you discuss your desires with a certified plastic surgeon in your location. Your specialist will perform a total examination and health history survey to identify if liposuction can benefit you and help you reach your physical and emotional objectives. Call today for an examination and find out more about how liposuction can assist you attain the body of your dreams.


text:
This information is provided for your convenience and may no longer be valid.
Status: Open
Know more about this business than we do? Cool! Please submit any corrections or missing details you may have.Help us make it right
Since its light first turned on in 1962, Motel 6 had been synonymous with great value travel. Our brand promise – providing a clean, comfortable room and great service for the lowest price of any national chain – remains, but much has changed in the last 50 years. A passion for growth and innovation, in addition to our unwavering commitment to a great guest experience, is how we have and will...
WiFi available in all guest rooms for a nominal fee. Amenities include: Beach within 10 miles, Coin Laundry, Outdoor Pool & Restaurant Nearby.
Be the first AL.com user to add photos or videos of Motel 6 Destin
In Short
Since 1962, travelers have enjoyed budget-friendly prices at Motel 6. The national chain (more than 800 locations in the U.S.) accommodates traveling families, as kids stay for...
My room was nice. I loved the way it was set up it was such a cute room.\n\nI would have liked it better if they had breakfast at the hotel for us. The parking minded sucked when they are booked and everyone is back at the hotel for the night there is no where to park!!
Clean friendly good rate. I Will be back dog friendly very friendly staff. Very clean grounds. Close to everythintg I love it . Try staying here. Close to the beach. What can I say. … Clean friendly good rate. I Will be back dog friendly very friendly staff. Very clean grounds. Close to everythintg I love it . Try staying here. Close to the beach. What can I say. Park right at the door.
This motel is within close proximity of HarborWalk Marina and HarborWalk Village.
Situated near the beach, this motel is 0.6 mi (0.9 km) from HarborWalk Marina and 1.8 mi (3 km) from Big Kahuna's Water and Adventure Park. Destin History and Fishing Museum and HarborWalk Village are also within 15 minutes.
American Association of Retired Persons members receive a 10-percent discount.
A pet-friendly policy allows pets (one per room) to stay free of charge, but they must be registered at check-in and be attended by a guest at all times.


text:
You may also like
[ShopLyfter] Audrey Royal (Case No. 3645782 )
374 Views0 Comments2 Likes
[ExxxtraSmall] Morgan Lee (Tiny Hands Solve Big Problems )
495 Views0 Comments1 Likes
[BoobDay] Bridgette B (Bridgette B's Bubbles )
425 Views0 Comments0 Likes
[BigTitsRoundAsses] Daya Knight (Daya's first Bang Scene!!! )
137 Views0 Comments0 Likes
[BrownBunnies] Adrian Maya (Watching Adrian Maya in the shower )
208 Views0 Comments0 Likes
[8thStreetLatinas] Jade Dylan (Fat Pussy )
109 Views0 Comments0 Likes
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


text:
This earnings season has not been a confidence instilling one. There have been a handful of companies that have exceeded expectations and many more that have fallen short. Whole Foods Market (WFM) has been one of the brighter spots in an otherwise mediocre economy. After its earnings call on Wednesday, the grocer stock ran up over 10%. There is much more reason to believe in Whole Foods Market than just one good quarter however. The grocer has a grip on the health food business that is here to stay in a business that is sure to become increasingly prevalent. As a momentum play, a long-term growth play, or a strategic aversion of Europe, Whole Foods does it all.
The jump in Whole Foods stock can be attributed to both its quarterly earnings and its revved-up outlook. The company reported earnings of $0.63 per share topping estimates of $0.61 per share, up from an EPS of $0.50 a year ago. Revenue rose 13.6% to $2.727 billion, slightly missing expectations of $2.733 billion. Inventory management and better store-level performance helped to shelter Whole Foods from a decline in consumer confidence. It is also notable that gross profit rose 15.6% to $981.4 million and comparable-store sales were up 8.2% with identical-store sales up 8%. To be fair, comparable-store sales did decline from 8.4% in the same quarter last year, but the small differential is insignificant and the takeaway is that strong same-store growth is continuing. Although Whole Foods did not beat estimates by all that much, amidst decreasing consumer confidence and a struggling economy the fact that consumers were willing to pay more money for products provided by Whole Foods is a signal of a strong customer base and a strong business.
No less important was Whole Foods' optimistic outlook including development of new stores and raised expectations. Currently Whole Foods Market operates 329 stores in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. The grocer opened a record nine outlets during the quarter and plans to create six more this year. They outlined a plan to build 25 in 2012, 28 to 32 in 2013, and 33 to 38 new stores in 2014. As a reference point Whole Foods only built 18 stores in 2011. In total, 76 stores are being developed (or potentially developed) including the six more planned for this year.
Whole Foods Market is expanding physically in terms of new stores, but also in same-store sales. Heightened expectations for fiscal 2012 include an increase to 8.6-8.9% comparable-store sales from original guidance of 8.2-8.9%, as well as a 15.6-15.8% total sales increase as opposed to original estimates of 14.8-15.6%. The company is also anticipating EPS to be between $2.51 and $2.52 in fiscal 2012 which would translate into year over year growth of 30%. EPS was previously expected to come in at $2.44-$2.47, showing a jump in confidence as it is now expected to rise anywhere from 4 to 8 cents. Whole Foods went further and announced initial guidance for 2013 as well. They expect a 13-14% increase in total sales, a 6.5-8.5% rise in comparable-store sales, and an EPS between $2.83 and $2.87 amounting to a year over year increase of 16 to 17%.
The quarter was strong and the outlook was even stronger. As a testament to the grocer's continued growth, forecasts were boosted up to be in the high range of prior expectations or surmounting them all together. Without becoming lost in the numbers, it is important to realize a couple of things. The company was able to beat expectations in this quarter and maintain its hold on the health food market despite the expense of its products in our gloomy economy. Subsequently the company extended its confidence for the rest of the year, and even to fiscal 2013.
Whole Foods success this quarter and growth projections are nothing new for it. Over the past few years Whole Foods has seen both revenue and earnings per share increase incrementally and consistently.
With the chart provided by The Motley Fool, EPS growth is apparent particularly when seasonal patterns are noted. Total EPS is seen rising significantly and revenue has followed in a similar direction. Complimenting revenue and EPS progression is Whole Foods' solid balance sheet. The grocer has $4.29 billion in total assets with just $1.3 billion in total liabilities. Just as attractively, it holds only $18 million in debt. Whole Foods has exhibited excellent growth in the past few years and has constructed a spotless balance sheet to go along with its quarter and its outlook.
Whole Foods Market has found its niche with consumers and is positioned in the perfect business to continue to thrive. Its stores are located in urban areas and appeal to an increasingly large health-conscious crowd. Unfortunately not all Americans, or people in general, take an importance in their health (or can afford to) but the amount that do is on the rise. Just over one quarter of Americans are obese and efforts such as the First Lady's to inform the public in order to promote health will likely continue in order to combat obesity and unhealthiness. These campaigns bode well for Whole Foods. Similarly to what has happened in terms of declining cigarette use partially as a result of campaigns to educate about the dangers of smoking, information about the unhealthiness of fast food, chips, etc. will lead to health food becoming a necessity. Therefore, unlike many other trends, healthy and natural food is going to be around for a long time and Whole Foods is here to capitalize on it.
Whole Foods' lucrative business goes beyond its industry. As previously mentioned, their placement in urban areas has been an excellent strategy and is one of the reasons why they have not suffered from a halt in consumer spending. Even more appealing is the minimization of European risk. The grocer controls stores in America, Canada, and the United Kingdom, meaning that the problems in the European Union have little impact as no stores are located on the continent. Though some exposure exists, conditions in the U.K. are much more stable than they are in Western Europe, leaving Whole Foods relatively shielded from eurozone downside.
A testament to the strength of Whole Foods may have come from Starbucks' (SBUX) quarterly miss and bleak outlook. While Starbucks is a restaurant and coffee shop, it is on the high-end side and it was clear that consumer unwillingness to pay more for their coffee was part of the reason that they failed to reach estimates. Whole Foods, with its more expensive products, did not have this problem. As a result, it can be inferred that it has developed a stronger, more specific clientele that is willing to dish out more money for its healthier food. Whole Foods has executed an effective strategy and is perfectly located to succeed in holding its grip on its consumer base, as well as expanding to new customers in synchrony with the entirety of the health food industry.
Whole Foods Market has become one of the brightest spots in the stock market. Even though it is expensive with a P/E of 39.62, the stock is a few dollars off of its 52-week high and has more than enough growth to sustain this multiple. The grocer operates a strong influence in an up-and-coming health food industry that is sure to expand further. The stock has momentum coming out of earnings with plenty of optimism and very few negative catalysts to get in the way. Long-term, it operates an excellent business and its management team headed by co-founder and CEO John Mackey is well-qualified to lead the company to a successful future. As an additional incentive Whole Foods has little to fear from Europe with no stores on the continent. Its stock ran up after its earnings call but much of it was because of the selloff that occurred after Chipotle's (CMG) quarterly report. With that being said, it will continue to outperform the market and it is wise to stick with what is working and will continue to work. Whole Foods is an excellent stock and company with plenty of warranted optimism, making it a stellar buy.
Disclosure: I am long WFM.
Additional disclosure: Initiated my long position last week. Earnings information courtesy of Zacks Investment Research (community.nasdaq.com/News/2012-07/whole-...)


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
December 28, 1984
MIKROPUL CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
DESIMONE & CHAPLIN-AIRTECH, INC., and VINCENT J. DESIMONE and JAMES E. CHAPLIN, doing business as DESIMONE, CHAPLIN AND ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Defendants.
This diversity action arises from contractual disputes surrounding the construction of an air pollution control facility at United States Steel's ("USS") Fairless, Pennsylvania plant. Defendants Vincent DeSimone ("DeSimone") and James Chaplin ("Chaplin"), doing business as DeSimone, Chaplin and Associates ("DSC"), have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 dismissing that portion of Mikropol's ("Mikropol") fourth and fifth causes of action that seeks recovery of money for an alleged failure of DSC to design piles for tension and also, separately, dismissing the fourth cause of action in its entirety. DSC also seeks an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) striking paragraph 36 of Mikropol's fifth cause of action. All motions are denied.
Alleged Facts
Mikropol seeks damages for defendant's fraudulent inducement and breach of contract, negligence, and professional malpractice in connection with a contract awarded by Mikropol to DeSimone & Chaplin-Airtech ("Airtech"). Mikropol, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at Summitt, New Jersey, provides services and equipment to industrial customers to aid in insuring compliance with air pollution requirements. Airtech is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York, New York. DSC is a partnership whose partners, DeSimone and Chaplin, reside in New York. The principal place of business of DSC is New York, New York.
On April 1, 1980 Mikropol entered into a contract with USS for the design and construction of an air pollution control system at USS" steel manufacturing facility in Fairless, Pennsylvania. Mikropol invited competing bids from vendors and subcontractors in response to specifications provided by Mikropol.
One of the competing bids submitted for the design and engineering subcontract was from Airtech. Mikropol alleges that the Airtech bid claimed that Airtech had been in business since 1969, that Airtech employed eighteen engineers, designers, and consultants, that DeSimone and Chaplin were primary technical personnel of Airtech, and that both would be active on the Fairless project. Mikropol also alleges that these representations were reinforced by statements made and appearances set forth by DeSimone in a visit to Airtech's offices by Mikropol officials. Mikropol, in reliance on these statements granted Airtech the subcontract.
Mikropol now asserts that Airtech has been in business since 1976, not 1969, that Airtech employed fewer than eighteen professionals, that any work performed by DeSimone and Chaplin was not performed directly for Airtech but was performed for DSC in its capacity as a "subcontractor" of Airtech, despite the prior representation that DeSimone and Chaplin were primary employees of Airtech. Mikropol maintains further that although Airtech was presented as a viable engineering firm, it was really an under-capitalized, virtually assetless shell corporation designed to shield DSC from primary liability.
Mikropol also alleges that Airtech and the other defendants, as "subcontractors," did not use reasonable and professional care in designing the piles for the Fairless plant, causing $650,000 in damage. Mikropol maintains that subsequent to discovering the nature of the design error, Mikropol and USS reached an agreement designed to allocate the immediate costs of corrective measures so that completion of the Fairless plant could be as expeditious as possible. Mikropol maintains that this agreement did not constitute a settlement of the liability resulting from the design errors nor did it contain a release from any further effort by USS to recover damages.
DSC asserts that no contract existed between DSC and Mikropol, and that any work done by DSC in connection with the Fairless project was done in DSC's capacity as a subcontractor of Airtech. DSC also alleges that the agreement between USS and Mikropol allocating repair costs represented a resolution and settlement of the liabilities resulting from the improper design of the piles for the Fairless plant.
Motions for summary judgment cannot be granted when material issues of fact remain to be resolved, and the burden is on the moving party to establish that no relevant facts are in dispute. Schering Corp. v. Home Ins. Co., 712 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1983). The court cannot try issues of fact, and "[i]ndeed, the court must resolve all ambiguities and resolve all inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought." Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp., 613 F.2d 438, 445 (2d Cir. 1980) (quoting Heyman v. Commerce & Industry Ins. Co., 524 F.2d 1317, 1319 (2d Cir. 1975)).
An initial hurdle in this case is to determine which state's substantive law to apply. The decision to apply either New York, Pennsylvania, or New Jersey law is not dispositive of these motions, given the near equivilence of these states' laws in the relevant areas and the major factual issues that remain to be resolved. For the reasons set forth below, New York law will be applied, but this conclusion is subject to change upon further evidence concerning the interest and contacts involved. See Am. Elec. Power Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 418 F. Supp. 435, n.36 [Footnote omitted] (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
The New York substantive law, of course, includes choice of law rules. Day and Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner, 423 U.S. 3, 46 L. Ed. 2d 3, 96 S. Ct. 167 (1975); Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 85 L. Ed. 1477, 61 S. Ct. 1020 (1941). The general rule in New York tort cases is still that of lex loci delicti. Cousins v. Instrument Flyers, Inc., 44 N.Y.2d 698, 405 N.Y.S.2d 441, 376 N.E.2d 914 (1978). The place of the wrong in this case is New York: any alleged negligence or malpractice in the design work occurred either at Airtech or DSC, both located at 20 Waterside Plaza, New York. Moreover, although the Fairless plant is in Pennsylvania, a grouping of contracts test, Miller v. Miller, 22 N.Y.2d 12, 290 N.Y.S.2d 734, 735, 237 N.E.2d 877 (1068), requires that New York law be applied. The defendants reside in New York; the DSC subcontract was executed in New York; the defendants are licensed professionals in New York; and Airtech is incorporated in New York. Finally, the interests of New York in regulating the conduct involved are greater than those of the other states. Delbrueck & Co. v. Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co., 464 F. Supp. 989, 993 (S.D.N.Y.) aff'd, 609 F.2d 1047 (2d Cir. 1979); Babcock v. Jackson, 12 N.Y.2d 473, 240 N.Y.S.2d 743, 191 N.E.2d 279 (1963). New York has the greatest interest in insuring that professionals licensed to practice in this state comply with the standard of care imposed by New York, and New York has a paramount interest in preserving the integrity of the corporate form under New York law by regulating the standards which control piercing the veil of New York corporations.
The gravamen of DSC's motion for summary judgment on the tension/compression element of the fourth and fifth causes of action is that Mikropol effected a settlement with USS and therfore is precluded by General Obligation Law § 15-108 from bringing an action for contribution. DSC argues that the interchange of letters and the series of meetings which preceded the agreement to divide the costs of correcting the design error constitute a release and final compromise of the claim.
Both a settlement and release are contracts to which the ordinary rules of contract interpretation apply. See e.g., Macy v. United States, 557 F.2d 391, 393 (3d Cir. 1977) ("It is hornbook law that a release is the relinquishment, concession or giving up of a right, claim or privilege . . . and it has been held to be a contract or a species of a contract.") Mt. Read Terminal, Inc. v. LeChase Const. Corp., 58 A.D.2d 1034, 396 N.Y.S.2d 959, 960 (4th Dept. 1977) ("Releases are contractual in nature, and whether a release is general . . . depends upon the intention of the parties.") In order for there to be a settlement or a release, therefore, the parties must intend to terminate or discharge the claims being asserted, see Martin v. Traver, 19 A.D.2d 571, 239 N.Y.S.2d 781 (App.Div. 1963); Macy, supra.
Mikropol asserts vigorously that the letters which constituted the parties' agreement was neither a settlement nor a release. Indeed, Mikropol claims that the intent of the parties was that Mikropol would continue to be liable for any defects or improper performance.
Because a factual dispute exists as to the intent of the parties at the time they concluded the interim agreement, this court cannot, for the purposes of a motion for summary judgment, accept as a premise that a settlement for the purposes of GOL 15-108 exists. This Circuit has stated that "[w]here contractual language is susceptible of at least two fairly reasonable interpretations, this presents a triable issue of fact, and summary judgment would be improper." Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance Co., 524 F.2d 1317, 1320 (2d Cir. 1975). See Putnam v. Otsego Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 41 A.D.2d 981, 343 N.Y.S.2d 736, 778-9 (App.Div. 3d Dept. 1973) ("[T]here is a conflict concerning the intention of the parties [with respect to the alleged compromise and settlement] and, since the parties did not waive the right to a resolution of questions of fact by a jury . . . summary judgment should not have been granted.") Shindler v. Lamb, 25 Misc. 2d 810, 211 N.Y.S.2d 762, 766 (S. Ct. 1959), aff'd, 10 A.D.2d 826, 200 N.Y.S.2d 346 (1st Dept.), aff'd, 9 N.Y.2d 621, 210 N.Y.S.2d 226, 172 N.E.2d 79 (1961) ("[The] claim of release is a question of fact to be raised . . . and decided at the trial.")
DSC's second motion for summary judgment seeks to dismiss the fourth count in its entirety on the theory that there is no privity between Mikropol and DSC. In support of this motion DSC argues that as a subcontractor of Airtech with no contractual obligations to Mikropol, DSC is immune from Mikropol's action. This motion fails on two grounds: first, material issues of fact exist with respect to Mikropol's motion to pierce Airtech's corporate veil and recognize DSC as the real party in interest in the contract, thereby creating privity, and second, under New York law a professional may, in certain circumstances, be liable to a foreseeable plaintiff even in the absence of privity.
In New York, several criteria are paramount in determining whether to pierce a corporate veil: 1) the absence of the formalities which are part and parcel of normal corporate existence, i.e., the election of directors, keeping of corporate records; 2) inadequate capitalization; 3) personal use of corporate funds; and 4) the perpetration of fraud by means of the corporate vehicle. Walter E. Heller & Co. v. Video Innovations, Inc., 730 F.2d 50, 53 (2d Cir. 1984), citing Bartle v. Finkelstein, 19 A.D.2d 256, 241 N.Y.S.2d 655 (1963), Quaid v. Ratkowsky, 183 A.D. 428, 170 N.Y.S. 812 (1918). Further, a corporation's form may be disregarded where the corporation has been a mere shell "dominated and controlled by the individuals to carry on their own personal business." England Strohl/Denigris, Inc. v. Weiner, 538 F. Supp. 612, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), citing Astrocom Electronics v. Lafayette Radio, 63 A.D.2d 765, 404 N.Y.S.2d 742 (3d Dept. 1978).
Mikropol alleges that Airtech is a "mere dummy for its individual shareholders who are in reality carrying on the business in their personal capacities for personal rather than corporate ends," quoting Walkovszky v. Carlton, 18 N.Y.2d 414, 276 N.Y.S.2d 585, 223 N.E.2d 6 (1966). Mikropol claims that since Airtech's formation DeSimone and Chaplin have controlled and dominated Airtech's operations in such a way that its primary function was to shield DSC from propsective liability. Mikropol claims that Airtech was purposely under-capitalized, has filed no income tax returns since 1978, maintains no malpractice insurance, and used DSC's resources in a supposed "contractor-subcontractor relationship" to cover Airtech's lack of substance. Further, Mikropol alleges that Airtech failed to observe requisite corporate formalities and misled clients with respect to the scope of Airtech's resources and capitalization. Mikropol further claims that DSC, because of its control and domination of Airtech, should be recognized as a principal bound by the ratified actions of its agent. See Walko vs zky v. Carlton, 18 N.Y.2d 414, 276 N.Y.S.2d 585, 587, 223 N.E.2d 6 (Ct.Ap. 1966).
Although DSC disputes both the factual allegations and the conclusions based upon them, genuine issues of material fact have been raised which must be resolved before legal certainty can attach to a decision with respect to the existence of privity. On this basis alone, DSC's second motion for summary judgment can be denied.
Mikropol has also asserted a negligence cause of action against DSC based upon Milropol's status as a foreseeable plaintiff, even in the absence of privity. In Quintel v. Citibank, 80 Civ. 4936 (slip op. June 4, 1984), I examined the negligence liability of professionals to persons not in privity. There I concluded that White v. Guarente, 43 N.Y.2d 356, 401 N.Y.S.2d 474, 372 N.E.2d 315 (1977), in which an accountant was found liable to the limited partners although he was retained by the general partners, did not extend to make a lawyer retained by general partners liable in negligence to limited partners. I emphasized that the privity requirement had been more stringently observed in the context of a lawyer's liability, in part because of the particular ethical restraints imposed on an attorney representing a client. Those restraints effectively create a narrow range of foreseeable clients. "To hold that a limited partner is automatically a foreseeable client of the attorney representing the general partners or even the limited partnership, in the absence of any affirmative assumption of duty by the attorney, would ignore Ethical Consideration 5-18 which specifically defines the attorney's allegiance to the entity that retained him rather than to any person connected with the entity." Slip Op. at 10.
No such ethical restraints distinguish architects or engineers from accountants, who were the subject of analysis in White, supra, and Ultramares Corp. v. Touche, 255 N.Y. 170, 174 N.E. 441 (1931). I find that on the facts of this case architects and engineers fall within the rule established by White, supra, and Glanzer v. Shepard, 233 N.Y. 236, 135 N.E. 275 (1922). In White the Court of Appeals concluded:
Defendant Andersen's contention, that plaintiff falls beyond the bounds of protected parties, rests primarily on the theory that its contract with the limited partnership circumscribed the extent of its obligation and the outer limits of its care. This reasoning fails to recognize that "[t]he duty of reasonable care in the performance of a contract is not always owed solely to the person with whom the contract is made * * * It may inure to the benefit of others." While Ultramares made it clear that accountants were not to be liable in negligence on the generalized basis that a contract for professional services creates liability in favor of the general populace, this plaintiff seeks redress, not as a mere member of the public, but as one of a settled and particularized class among the members of which the report would be circulated for the specific purpose of fulfilling the limited partnership agreed upon arrangement.
See Calamari v. Grace, 98 A.D.2d 74, 469 N.Y.S.2d 942, 946 (App.Div. 1983) (recognizing as an exception to requirement of privity situations "where the abstracter should have foreseen that a third party would rely on the abstract.")
In J. McKinney & Son v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic G., 461 N.Y.S.2d 483 (App.Div. 3d Dept. 1983) the Court used the White formulation to determine the liabilities of various parties in a construction setting. In holding a project manager liable to a subcontractor the Court stated: "As project manager, Gilbare was required to "manage, supervise, and inspect the construction." . . . These duties can reasonably be said to inure to the benefit of subcontractors as well as the owner for the former are "members of a limited class' whose reliance upon the project manager's ability is clearly foreseeable." Citing White, McKinney at 486. On the facts as presented to the court, it appears that Mikropol was within the range of foreseeable beneficiaries defined by White. An action in negligence brought by Mikropol against DSC therefore survives.
DSC also seeks, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), to strike paragraph 36 of the complaint. The standard that must be met in order to strike material pursuant to 12(f) is a stringent one. "A motion to strike immaterial or impertinent matter from a pleading will ordinarily not be granted unless the matter sought to be stricken clearly can have "no possible relation" to the matter in controversy." Gleason v. Chain Service Restaurant, 300 F. Supp. 1241, 1257 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), aff'd, 422 F.2d 342 (2d Cir. 1970). The circuit courts have also suggested delay in determining whether material in the pleadings deserves to be stricken, recommending that only as a trial unfolds can a determination of relevance be properly made. See Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp., 551 F.2d 887 (2d Cir. 1976). Whether, or under what circumstances, the material relating to Airtech's failure to obtain malpractice insurance will be presented to the jury is an evidentiary question that best awaits later determination.
DSC's motions for summary judgment and to strike paragraph 36 are denied. Discovery shall be completed by April 3 and a joint pretrial order submitted by April 10, 1985
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Joaquim Rocha
This is a demo to show how Angry Birds (its web version) can be played with a Kinect by combining Skeltrack and OpenCV.
Skeltrack is used to track where the user's hands are, their position is used to move the mouse. OpenCV is then used to get the ConvexityDefects from the hands' image which gives us the number of fingers; this can be used to know if the hand's palm is open or closed and simulate a mouse press according to this state.
The end result is not yet polished but it gives a good idea of what can be done with 100% Free Software.


text:
Check in from 12h / Check out prior to 10h
Fiorentino: Find photos, reviews, information, amenities and compare prices for 1 stars hotels in Florence, Italy.
Conveniently situated, Fiorentino offers easy access to Florence's main hot spots. It is located a short stroll from Giotto's Campanile and Florence Cathedral.
Hotel description
There are a variety of facilities on offer to those staying at Fiorentino Hotel Florence, including a TV room, limited hours room service and luggage storage.
Each comfortable room at Hotel Fiorentino features heating, as well as all the necessities for an enjoyable stay. After settling in to their room, guests can discover the local area with use of Firenze Santa Maria Novella Railway Station, which is moments from the hotel.
Fiorentino's district is known for its nightlife and guests will be spoilt for choice when it comes to dining and bar options. The hotel also provides breakfast each day.
Set in the Tuscany Wine Region, Fiorentino Hotel Florence is a convenient base for those interested in trying the area's specialties. The local area is also well-known for its shops and boutiques.
Hotel features
Room Service, Cable / Satellite TV, TV
Photocopier, Luggage Storage
Availability and Prices
Booking Site
Room Type
Per room
Per night
Per night
Users who viewed Fiorentino also viewed these 1 stars Florence hotels:
Loggia Fiorentina
Via San Gallo 31, Florence
Via San Gallo 31, Florence
Hotel Scoti
Via De' Tornabuoni 7, Florence
Via De' Tornabuoni 7, Florence
Hotel Duilio
Via Corso Italia 13, Florence
Via Corso Italia 13, Florence
Search hotels
based on


text:
On this page we provide our South Beach Diet promotion codes and discounts. In order to redeem offers, click the link next to the particular deal. If there's a promotion code, enter it at the website to redeem the offer.
|South Beach Diet Coupons and Offers
|20% off South Beach Diet.
|Free Diet Profile.
|South Beach Diet Books from Amazon.com
|South Beach Diet Recipes – SouthBeach Diet Recipe Cookbooks at Amazon.com
Shop at SouthBeachDiet.com Now
Prior to when you complete the checkout procedure, make sure that your discount special or promotion code worked as expected. AllOnlineCoupons has no responsibility if you do not get the desired discount. Free shopping deals and coupon codes can expire at any time without prior notice. If we include any promo codes or special promotions that do not work, could you let us know so we can remove invalid or expired offers.
Thanks for using our website for discount shopping deals.
Browse coupons and discounts for other merchants in Health and Beauty:
1-800-Get-Lens – 24 Hour Fitness Coupon Codes – 39DollarGlasses.com – 911 Health Shop Coupon Codes – A1 Supplements – AC Lens – Ali Express – American Diabetes Wholesale – Ameriglide.com – At His Best Coupons – Bath and Body Works – Be Beautiful – Beauty.com – Bergners – Bob Greene Diet – Beyond the Rack – BH Cosmetics – Biggest Loser Club Coupon – BillionDollarBabes.com – Biotherm – Blush.com Coupons – Closeout Zone – Contact Lens King – Crabtree and Evelyn Coupon Codes – Curl Friends – Cymax Stores – DDF Skin Care – DeniseAustin.com Coupon – DietPower.com Coupon Codes – DietWatch.com – Dollar Days – Dollar Tree – Dr Leonards – DrSoy.com – Dr Williams – Drugstore.com – EyesLipsFace.com – eBay.com – Elizabeth Arden Coupon – Enzyte – Eyeglasses123.com – FaceLube.com – Factory Outlet Store – Fitness Equipment Select – Focalprice.com Coupon – Folica – Fragrance Net – Fragrance Shop Coupon Codes – Freshology – Gaiam Coupon Codes – Goldshield USA Coupon – GreatSkin.com – H2Oplus.com – Health Check Systems – Heartland America – Insurance Agents – Ionizer Oasis – iTrain Coupon – Jessica Simpson Collection – Just Lenses – Kiehl's – Kmart – Kohls – Kordial Nutrients – L'Occitane – Lancome Cosmetics – Lens.com – LensCrafters – Living Social – MedEx Supply Coupon Code – Medifast Coupon Code – Meijer.com Coupon Codes – Midwest Center – Miles Kimball – Mod Deals – Murad Skin Care – MyNutritionStore.com Coupons – Native Remedies – Nutri System – Online Fitness – Perfume Emporium – Perfume Worldwide – Philosophy.com – Prescriptives Coupon Code – Pro Health – Pro White Teeth – ProForm.com Coupons – Red Tag Coupons – ReebokFitness.com Coupon – RelaxTheBack.com – Rite Aid – Saks Fifth Avenue – SallyBeauty.com – Scentiments – Sears.com – Sephora.com – Skin Care Rx Coupon Code – Smart for Life Cookie Diet Coupons – Smash Box – Sonoma Diet – SouthBeachDiet.com – Strawberry Net Coupon – Swanson Vitamins – Target.com Coupon Codes – Test Country Coupons – TheBodyShop.com Coupon Codes – The Natural Store – Thera Breath – Time For Me Catalog – Trim 360 – Vermont Country Store – Vision Direct – Vita Pal – Vitality Medical – VitaminMenu.com – Vitamin Shoppe – Vivre Catalog Coupon Code – Walgreens.com – Wayfair – Weight Watchers – Weslo Coupon – Zirh.com Coupon Codes ... More Health and Beauty Stores
In addition to this page of online shopping deals and coupon codes, also take a look at our SymantecStore.com Coupons, Zappos.com Coupons, Honeywell Central Coupons, The Fruit Company Coupons and WSJ.com Coupons.
At our web site, our desire is to offer the premier savings and promotions available for all of the leading online merchants. An important part of that passion for useful benefit is the collections of coupons and promo codes you find on this web page. Thanks for saving with us.
We thank you for accessing this web site, and thanks for helping make this web site the most highly regarded coupon site around. Feel free to e-mail us any shopping deals, discount specials and online deals we don't already have.
|Hot Coupons and Deals
|Herbs Pro: 5% off $399+ order.
Coupon Code: DSC198130
More Herbs Pro Coupons
|Benefit Cosmetics: Got a Dilemma – Visit Benefit's Beauty ER for Instant Beauty Solutions.
More Benefit Cosmetics Coupons
|1800 Any Lens: 10% off Vertex Toric and Free Shipping on $50+ order.
Coupon Code: VRT10
More 1800 Any Lens Coupons
|Thera Breath: 10% off any order.
Coupon Code: ATB10Off
More Thera Breath Coupons
|Sephora: Shop Holiday Gifts.
More Sephora Coupons
|1800 Any Lens: 10% off Frequency 55 Toric XR and Free Shipping on $50+ order.
Coupon Code: F5TX10
More 1800 Any Lens Coupons
|Coastal Contacts: $20 off Contact Lenses on Orders of $100+.
Coupon Code: CONTACTS20
More Coastal Contacts Coupons
|Medifast: $15 off Orders of $150+.
Coupon Code: SHOP15
More Medifast Coupons
|Dermstore: $10 off your next order by referring your friends.
More Dermstore Coupons
|1800 Any Lens: 10% off Expressions and Free Shipping on $50+ order.
Coupon Code: EXP10
More 1800 Any Lens Coupons
|Thera Breath: Free Sheet of TheraBreath Chewing Gum with any order
Coupon Code: BTBGum
More Thera Breath Coupons
|The Body Shop: Bath and Body Gift Sets.
More The Body Shop Coupons
|Canada Pharmacy: 5% off all prescriptions, over-the-counter medicine and pet meds
Coupon Code: CJ05CP
More Canada Pharmacy Coupons
|Herbs Pro: Additional 7% off Orders Above $100.
Coupon Code: AFL100
More Herbs Pro Coupons
Copyright 2016 AllOnlineCoupons.com>


text:
There is a scene where the Belgian soldiers arrive at Hotel Rwanda. They are there for evacuating the European refugees (NOT THE AFRICAN ONES). While the Europeans are boarding the bus, a group of orphans arrive. 907 more words
Tags » Terry George
Norwich Author's First Children's Book Focuses on Friendship and Not Judging Others
Norwich resident Terry George will make her debut as a children's book author with Sasha & Jake, released October 4 from Farmer's Daughter Press.
George, a former resident of Willimantic, wrote and illustrated the book. 221 more words
Kirk Kerkorian's Legacy: A Mainstream Feature About The Armenian Genocide
EXCLUSIVE: What a fitting legacy for Kirk Kerkorian. Because of the late Armenian mogul, the first mainstream film about the genocide of Armenians at the hand of the Turks has finally been produced in Hollywood. 1,472 more words
Film Review: 'The Promise'
"Our revenge will be to survive, and have children," rallies the mayor of an Ottoman city whose Armenian population is targeted for annihilation in Terry George's "The Promise." And he might add, "… and one day, to make movies," since that is ultimately what "The Promise" is about: Aiming to do for the 1915 Armenian Genocide what "Doctor Zhivago" did for the Russian Revolution, this sweeping romantic epic dramatizes a dark chapter in history so often denied and so seldom depicted onscreen — and yet, the events being considered deserve better than a sloggy melodrama in which the tragedy of a people is forced to take a back seat to a not especially compelling love triangle. 1,121 more words
"Fan Pens", Gender Inequity And Armenian Genocide In 'The Promise' Bring New Problems To Toronto
On Monday morning, The Birth Of A Nation is gone from the Toronto Film Festival (at least until a last screening on Saturday), and there's finally time for somebody else's problems. 595 more words
THE PROMISE (2016): New Trailer From Oscar Isaac, Christian Bale, Charlotte Le Bon...
Starring Christian Bale, Oscar Isaac and Charlotte Le Bon, the backdrop of The Promise is the last days of the Ottoman Empire/ the Armenian genocide. The heart of the movie is a love triangle – one between the beautiful, sophisticated Ana, a renowned American journalist and a brilliant medical student… 161 more words
'Hotel Rwanda's Terry George Looks At Armenian Genocide With 'The Promise': Toronto Q&A
The last time he introduced a hot button film at the Toronto Film Festival on a genocidal campaign, Terry George infused Hotel Rwanda with the momentum it needed to break through and make a global impact. 3,743 more words


text:
Cliff Hairpin
Bridgestone making roads safer 1931
Executive Creative Director: Fouad Abdel Malak
Creative Director / Copywriter: Amit Kapoor
Associate Creative Director / Art Director: Dinesh Tharippa
Post Production: Procolor Singapore
Photographers: Corbis Images, Photolibrary
The Jobless Writer
Will Think for Salary
You must be joking.
There is nothing even remotely similar between these 2 ads.
Tyre safety barrier? No, no difference at aaaaall.
The Jobless Writer
Will Think for Salary
Your ability to see beyond what's laid in front of you, or more accurately, the lack thereof , questions how valid your arguments and opinions are.
If I show you 2 pictures of a chicken, one for advertising poultry and one for implying cowardice, it's the same idea because IT'S A FREAKING CHICKEN, right?
Nice image...I like it. It's not exactly the same as the old one.
//usevertising v.s badvertising//
C'est une question de vie ou de mort.
It's a first idea concept. I can image they were in the drawing room and "Hey so how to depict a safe road?" "Oh how about a road with rubber fence?" "Hey that's great! Let's call it a day, go for a drink and charge Bridgestone $50k!".
Brand Design | Logo Design | Brochure Design | Website Design | Branding Packages
Quality tyres makes your trip safer. They just illustrated it different... works for me
I'm not sure if this simple idea has been done before. It's a quick way to say "We make roads safe." But it certainly hasn't been done in the link everyone is producing. The other Ad says "Other tires are just junk." Not the same AD at all. It'd be like any food Ad regardless of message, "Omg, they're the same Ad, people are eating!" Or even car Ads, "Omg, they're all driving!"
OMG... both ads use tyres as safety barriers.
The Jobless Writer
Will Think for Salary
mission accomplished
"If you are irritated by every rub, how will you be polished?"
— Rumi
Popular Reads
Holiday Season
5 Creative Black Friday Campaigns You Should KnowRead More
Signature Style
Shelley Zalis of The Girls' Lounge is "Not Afraid to Be Bold"Read More
Sponsored By the drum
How WildAid & Grey London Created #jointheherd to Impact the World's Ivory TradeRead More
Election Season
The Results Are In: Reflecting on Adland's Election SeasonRead More


text:
Healthcare - Home Office/Telecommute
Publish Date: 30-11-2016 13:16:13 | Contact name: Diane Berl | Location: USA | Place: Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 |
Benefits company is looking for bright, intelligent people for PT/FT positions as a Benefit Consultant. No experience
necessary. Must have phone, computer and internet and be able to commit at
least 8-10 hours a week. Training provided. Customer Service experience
helpful. For Immediate interview, visit: http://www.freedomathometeam/DBerl or call Diane at 484-200-7555. Only those who respond with their complete
contact information (full name, valid personal email and phone number) will be
contacted or considered for an interview. You can also look at this video: https://youtu.be/G0IXKz10qyQ


text:
Sign Out
Sign In
My Account
Order Status
Customer Service
Customer Service
View Prices In:
Australian Dollar
British Pound
Canadian Dollar
Danish Krone
Japanese Yen
New Zealand Dollar
Norwegian Krone
Swedish Krona
Swiss Franc
Venezuelan Fuerte
Toggle navigation
Shop Products
Cowboy Boots
Men's Cowboy Boots
Women's Cowboy Boots
Kids' Cowboy Boots
Infant Cowboy Boots
Work Boots
Men's Clearance Boots
Women's Clearance Boots
Fastest Delivery - Men's Boots
Fastest Delivery - Women's Boots
Men's Justin Boots
Women's Justin Boots
Men's Lucchese Boots
Women's Lucchese Boots
Men's Ariat Boots
Women's Ariat Boots
Men's Tony Lama Boots
Women's Tony Lama Boots
Men's Dan Post Boots
Women's Dan Post Boots
Corral Boots
Men's Frye Boots
Women's Frye Boots
Men's Cowboy Boots
Men's Jeans
Men's Western Shirts
Men's T-Shirts
Cowboy Hats
Baseball Caps
Men's Outerwear
Men's Leather Jackets
Western Belts & Buckles
Hunting & Outdoor
Men's Equestrian Riding Boots & Apparel
Western Suits, Sportcoats & Slacks
Big & Tall Apparel
Men's Wallets & Accessories
New Arrivals
Men's Clearance
Fastest Delivery - Men's Boots
Justin Boots
Lucchese Boots
Tony Lama Boots
Ariat Boots
Dan Post Boots
Wrangler Jeans
Levis Jeans
Frye Boots
Cowgirl Boots
Women's Fashion Riding Boots
Women's Jeans
Women's Tops
Cowgirl Hats
Women's Outerwear
Women's Leather Jackets
Women's Belts & Buckles
Western Purses
Western Dresses & Skirts
Western Jewelry & Accessories
Equestrian Riding Boots & Apparel
Western Wedding
New Arrivals
Women's Clearance
Fastest Delivery - Women's Boots
Corral Boots
Ariat Boots
Justin Boots
Dan Post Boots
Wrangler Jeans
Miss Me Jeans
Frye Boots
Lucchese Boots
Kids' Cowboy Boots
Boys' Clothing
Girls' Clothing
Infant Clothing
Toddler Clothing
Kids' Cowboy Hats
Kids' Belts & Buckles
Kids' Toys & Accessories
Kids' Clearance
Men's Jeans
Women's Jeans
Kids' Jeans
Men's Clearance Jeans
Women's Clearance Jeans
Men's Wrangler Jeans
Women's Wrangler Jeans
Men's Levis Jeans
Women's Levis Jeans
Men's Cinch Jeans
Miss Me Jeans
Cowboy Hats
Cowboy Hats
Cowgirl Hats
Kids' Cowboy Hats
Hat Accessories
Leather Hats
Baseball Caps
Clearance Cowboy Hats
Stetson Felt Hats
Stetson Straw Hats
Justin Felt Hats
Justin Straw Hats
Work Boots
All Work Boots
Steel Toe Boots
Safety Toe Boots
Waterproof Boots
Snake Proof Boots
Comfort Work Boots
Electrical Hazard Boots
Winter Insulated Boots
Pull-On Work Boots
Lace-Up Work Boots
Red Wing Work Boots
Wolverine Work Boots
Justin Work Boots
Chippewa Work Boots
Ariat Work Boots
All Workwear
Work Shirts
Work Pants
Work Jackets
Work Overalls
Big & Tall Workwear
Flame Resistant Workwear
Carhartt Workwear
Dickies Workwear
Yeti Coolers & Accessories
Clearance Workwear
Western Bedding
Rustic Horse Bedding
Camouflage Bedding
Home Décor
Western Gifts
Kitchen Décor
Bathroom Décor
Western Wall Décor
Steer Horns
Western Statues
Clearance Home Décor & Gifts
Wrangler Jeans
Stetson Hats
Ariat Boots
Justin Boots
Corral Boots
Lucchese Boots
Dan Post Boots
Miss Me Jeans
Nocona Boots
Carhartt Workwear
Scully Apparel
More Brands
Panhandle Slim Women's Ocean Blue Embroidered Henley Top
Original Price
Coupon in Cart
Add to Cart
Item Number: 652967
Select Size
M - A few left
L - A few left
XL - In Stock
Select Color
59 - Aqua
59 - Aqua
Customer Reviews
55% cotton, 34% polyester, 11% rayon
Ocean blue with navy floral embroidery
Scoop neck
Henley button front
Relaxed fit
Long sleeve
Vendor Style: L9T8645
For classic western style and modern femininity, Panhandle Slim is the perfect fit. This women's White Label Henley baseball-style shirt is made from a comfortable cotton/poly/rayon blend and features elegant floral embroidery and a relaxed fit with a henley button front. You'll be the western star in any crowd with this cute Panhandle western top.
Sign In
My Account
Order Status
Privacy Policy
Shipping Information
Return Policy
Site Map


text:
|Property type
|Minimum Stay
In this XVI century building we have two different apartments: Apartment named Sforza 1, in Piazza Sforza Cesarini. In the heart of Rome. Close to Piazza Navona and Campo de Fiori, ten minutes walk from Spanish Steps, five to Vatican. Very well connected with buses on Corso Vittorio Emanuele. SFORZA 1: Third floor, Beautiful apartment on two levels, The apartment, completely renovated, is equipped with all modern comfort. The apartment can fit up to 5 people and consists of an entrance, living room with fireplace and dining table for six, from the windows a nice view on Piazza Sforza Cesarini, air conditioning hot-cold. One master bedroom with bath in suite with shower. One twin bedroom with bath in suite with shower, and a 'soppalco' with one extra bed, linens and towels are provided. Kitchen on the upper level fully equipped with all necessary cooking supplies, electric stove, electric oven. At this level a nice terrace with dining table.
I had the pleasure of staying in the 2 bedroom apt with my 3 daughters (ages 9,10, &12) for the month of June. The hosts, Edwardo & Anna, are the most lovely people.The apt is large and has a wonderful balcony. There is AC in all rooms, however, be aware that it can be expensive to run ($350 for the month is what we paid). We also used the washer a lot. The only thing that surprised me was that there was only 1 tv and it was very small/old. Wifi was only available in the downstairs twin bedroom and living room. I have stayed at 2 vacation apts since and this was superior to the others. The one I am at now in Florence, only has AC in the living room. Big mistake on my part. Make sure there is AC in the bedrooms. It's hot here! Also, took me a week to figure out the stove. It must have a pan on burner to start. There must be iron in the metal to work, so if you need to, use a spoon on the burner. Ask how to use the washer. Like I said, you couldn't ask for a better location, hosts, and apt in Rome. If we move to Rome from America, we would rent this apt for a year. I like the 3 floor walk-up, good for the bum! A Italian film was being shot in the 1 bed-room below us. Hope you enjoy this apt as much as we did. I just wanedt clean, AC, and Internet, but got so much more here.
This appartment is so charming and made a perfect stay for us - two couples - during our vacation in Rome. We could not have found a better place to stay.
It was very clean and well maintained and we felt secure and safe in these surroundings.
Booking was very easy and fast with Anna, and Edoardo was so helpful at check-in.
We will surely recommend this property to anyone, who is going to Rome.
Because of the central location, it was easy for us to walk to see - Spanish Steps, Pantheon, Piazza Navona, Forum Romanum, Colosseum, Vatican etc.
On the ground floor there is a very good restaurant, Luigi. Very good food and good service. We alså went to Barfetto, very good pizza but bad service.
When we go back to Rome, we wil call you again - THANK YOU SO MUCH for this wonderful vacation.
Nous avons séjourné quatre jours dans cet appartement qui ne nous a apporté que des satisfactions.
La localisation est idéale puisqu'on est à moins de 10 minutes de la piazza Navonna, du campo dei fiori et du château St-Ange et à 15 minutes du Vatican. L'appartement est équipé avec goût et les installations sont de grande qualité : lits très confortables, 3 salles de bain, plaque à induction et tout est d'une propreté impeccable.
Si vous partez à deux couples, les deux chambres ont chacune leurs avantages puisque la plus petite a une salle de bains très spacieuse et une belle vue sur la place.
Il vous faut seulement savoir qu'il y a trois étages sans ascenseur à gravir, mais c'est le prix à payer pour la vue et ma mère qui a 75 ans n'a pas eu l'air de trouver cela si haut !
Enfin, on ne peut pas conclure cette note sans souligner la gentillesse
d'Eduardo, sa disponibilité et ses bons conseils.
Our family (including two teenagers) stayed here in October 2010. Anna and Edoardo were excellent hosts and our contact with each of them was very pleasant and professional; in particular Edoardo went out of his way to ensure that our visit went smoothly, for which we remain very grateful. The location is magnificent (we were able to walk to all the major sights within Rome) and the apartment is a wonderful refuge to return to after a busy day(or night) out. We felt safe, secure and relaxed during our stay. We hope - one day! - to return again.
We spent 4 nights with 2 teenagers in June 2010. in the 2 bedroomed apartment. The apartment is very spacious and beautifully decorated in a traditional style, with all modern conveniences.
It was very central, the Vatican and Trevi Fountain is within walking distance .
Ideal for a family or 2 couples. Very enjoyable holiday. Eduardo was very helpful.
Family of 4 from Ireland
As we all know, 'Location' is king with property- Sforza 1 scores top marks, since Piazza Sforza Caesarini is so well located we could walk [almost!] everywhere, it really is the perfect place to stay. Most days we returned to the apartment for a short rest in the middle of the day before continuing our chosen itinery.
Rooms are comfortable and well appointed. We chose to have about half of our meals in the apartment, but could not resist the chance to eat al fresco in the glorious early spring Roman weather.
Making booking arrangements through Anna was fast and efficient. Eduardo greeted us on arrival and went to great lengths to make us at home.
Special touches included him helping me surprise my wife with a birthday cake the day after our arrival :)
Importantly the apartment feels very safe with good security. There is a restaurant on the ground floor of the apartment building and the waiters were very friendly to us and were clearly aware of who was coming and going.
We would thoroughly recommend Sforza 1 for a family holiday in Rome and if we get a chance to return, we will snap up Sforza 1 ourselves!
Thank you Anna and Eduardo, Ciao! :)
Historical centre of Rome . Campo die Fiori, Piazza Navona, Città del Vaticano ,Roman Forum 10 minutes walk.


text: Meta Battle Subway PokeBase - Pokemon Q&A Login Register All Activity Questions Unanswered Tags Users Ask a Question Rules Chat Is ash's oshawott the only case of in battle infituation? 0 votes I was watching meloetta and the undersea temple and I noticed oshawott was (technically) infituated with meloetta when it wanted to battle (scary enough its genderless...) anime meloetta asked Feb 10, 2013 by Proffessor Epic Please log in or register to add a comment. Please log in or register to answer this question. 1 Answer 4 votes Best answer The show and the corresponding movies works differently than the game does.Which can never happen in the game series. In other words Meloetta is a girl, but is not stated in the game. Note that a female voice accompanies only feminine looking Pokemon in the show and movies. If I answered your question then put it as best answer if not comment and I'll try to rewrite it. answered Feb 10, 2013 by Troll Patrol selected Feb 12, 2013 by Proffessor Epic Please log in or register to add a comment. Related questions Is noctowl Ash's only shiny pokemon? Are these three Ash's only powerhouse Pokemon in his Unova team? Is there anyway to change meloettas form back during battle? When meloetta is pirouette form, does it change back to aria forme automatically after the battle? Does Meloetta stay in Pirouette Form after the battle is over?? How Come Ash Doesn't Let Oshawott or Snivy Evolve? Has Cilan or Clemont/Serena or any of the cooks on ash's journey ever made a meat meal, or is everyone just vegetarian? What is the level of Ash's pikachu? Useful Meta Posts How to change your username How to add a user avatar Why was my post hidden? The points system Question etiquette Flags vs Downvotes Anime FAQ


text:
Log In
Allows LaTeX and related file uploads.
Download Version 0.3
Requires: 2.8.6 or higher
Compatible up to: 3.1.4
Last Updated: 6 years ago
Active Installs:
Got something to say? Need help?
Translate Allow LaTeX Uploads
0 people say it works.
0 people say it's broken.
Log in to vote.


text:
What forces deployed to Benghazi? From where? It's been pretty well established that no forces could've made it on time. Did you want a carrier task force stationed off Libya to protect the US cultural centre in Benghazi IN CASE it was attacked? Is that what you're trying to say?<quoted text>
If that were the case, why were not forces deployed to Ben Ghazi?
Oh, where did the A-6s, A-7s and F?A-18 come from? Hint, THREE U.S. aircraft carriers (USS Saratoga, USS America and USS Coral Sea)
Oh, we had 12 operation combat carriers and one training carrier in 1986.
You didn't need the carriers to air bomb Libya. Canada, France and the UK all operated their missions from mainland Europe, no carriers. And incidentally, just for the record, it was a stupid mission


text:
Hotel Bosco
Select your stay dates to check availability at Hotel Bosco
Hotel Bosco
About the Hotel
Property Location
When you stay at Hotel Bosco in Surbiton, you'll be in the suburbs and close to Hampton Court Palace and Chessington World of Adventures. This 4-star hotel is within the vicinity of Richmond Park and Twickenham Stoop Stadium.
Make yourself at home in one of the 20 air-conditioned rooms featuring flat-screen televisions. Complimentary wireless Internet access keeps you connected, and cable programming is available for your entertainment. Private bathrooms with shower/tub combinations feature designer toiletries and hair dryers. Conveniences include phones, as well as desks and coffee/tea makers.
Take advantage of recreation opportunities such as a nightclub, or other amenities including complimentary wireless Internet access and concierge services.
Grab a bite to eat at the hotel's restaurant, which features a bar, or stay in and take advantage of room service (during limited hours). Quench your thirst with your favorite drink at a bar/lounge.
Business, Other Amenities
Featured amenities include express check-in, express check-out, and a 24-hour front desk.
Hotel Facilities
- Bar/lounge
- Porter/bellhop
- Concierge services
- Restaurant
- One meeting room
- Free breakfast
- Number of buildings/towers - 1
- Free parking nearby
- Total number of rooms - 20
- 24-hour front desk
- Number of floors - 4
- Express check-in
- Nightclub
- Express check-out
- Designated smoking areas
- Year Built 2006
- Free WiFi
- Use of nearby fitness center (discount)
- Tours/ticket assistance
- Multilingual staff
- Elevator/lift
Room Facilities
- Daily housekeeping
- Free WiFi
- Free toiletries
- Hypo-allergenic bedding available
- Designer toiletries
- Cable TV service
- Iron/ironing board (on request)
- Coffee/tea maker
- Individually decorated
- Hair dryer
- Room service (limited hours)
- Private bathroom
- Desk
- Air conditioning
- Flat-panel TV
- Phone
- In-room climate control (air conditioning)
- Shower/tub combination
Hotel Policy
Know Before You Go
- Only registered guests are allowed in the guestrooms.
The following fees and deposits are charged by the property at time of service, check-in, or check-out.
- Early check-in fee: GBP 20
- Late check-out fee: GBP 20
The above list may not be comprehensive. Fees and deposits may not include tax and are subject to change.Show all hotel policy Show less hotel policy


text:
Salem-News.com - December 8, 2016 - 3:51 am
SNc Channels:
HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsPhoto GalleryADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe
About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News.
Bonnie King
Zip Weather
Weather Forecast
Salem-News.com Articles written by Bonnie King| Next Page
Salem-News.com (Dec-04-2016 11:52)
DAPL: Sec of Army Announced the Easement has been DENIEDBonnie King Salem-News.com
"We will not fight tonight, we will dance!" -Rami Bald Eagle, Cheyenne River Lakota Tribal Leader
(SALEM, Ore.) -
Moments ago, the Secretary of the Army contacted tribal leaders and announced the easement has been denied.
Salem-News.com (Nov-03-2016 23:00)
Pesticide-Tainted Cannabis Sold at North Bend, Salem, Eugene DispensariesBonnie King Salem-News.com Cannabis De-Classified
According to the OHA, the products were transferred with failed test results.
(SALEM, Ore.) -
Two strains of cannabis (marijuana) flower that contained the pesticide piperonyl butoxide at levels exceeding regulations were sold at Stonies in North Bend, and at Green-Way Medicinal in Salem. According to officials, the strains were sold under the names Pleeze and Dryzl.
Salem-News.com (Oct-01-2016 20:57)
OLCC Rules Out Many Cannabis Strain Names with Attractiveness to Children StandardBonnie King Salem-News.com Cannabis De-Classified
Rules for narrowing the acceptable strain names and testing and labeling marijuana items keep business owners jumping.
(SALEM, Ore.) -
Few, if any, businesses have had to jump through the amount of hoops thrown at those engaged in Oregon's cannabis industry.
Salem-News.com (Sep-05-2016 15:18)
Vandalism at Cape Kiwanda Destroys Duckbill FormationBonnie King Salem-News.com
Vandals crossed a fence put there for safety, and then destroyed the landmark.
(PACIFIC CITY, Ore.) -
A natural rock formation at Cape Kiwanda State Natural Area was found in pieces last week. The park is on the Oregon coast in southern Tillamook County.
Salem-News.com (Aug-30-2016 12:00)
Hostile Takeover of a Longtime Cannabis IconBonnie King Salem-News.com Cannabis De-Classified
"They haven't paid me a penny, but they've taken everything I've owned in my whole life." - Paul Stanford
(PORTLAND, Ore.) -
Paul Stanford was fired June 10th. BLINDSIDED, he would say. He received a certified letter from S.M.A.A.R.T., the corporation he owns a majority of, telling him he was out.
Salem-News.com (Aug-22-2016 16:20)
Oregon Rakes in $25.5 Million from Marijuana Taxes So Far This YearBonnie King Salem-News.com Cannabis De-Classified
Oregon counts up the revenue while sick and dying patients lose out.
(SALEM, Ore.) -
The green, green grass of home... Cannabis money is flowing like water in the State of Oregon.
Salem-News.com (Aug-18-2016 16:11)
Oregon Fire Marshall Urges Vigilance During Dangerously Dry DaysBonnie King Salem-News.com
A Red Flag Warning has been issued for the majority of NW Oregon
(SALEM, Ore.) -
With Oregon's hottest temperatures, gusty winds and low humidity occurring throughout the next few days, Oregon State Fire Marshal Jim Walker is urging all residents to take the utmost care and thorough caution to prevent wildfires.
Salem-News.com (Aug-13-2016 01:50)
Memorial Service Set for KATU Veteran Kirby BrumfieldBonnie King Salem-News.com In Memoriam
Kirby Earnest Brumfield, Jr
(PORTLAND, Ore.) -
In 1962, Kirby Brumfield signed on with Portland's KATU Channel 2 as Director of Agricultural Programming, the station's first weatherman, and he was the first voice to come over the air.
Salem-News.com (Aug-05-2016 16:20)
Marion County Commissioners Push Marijuana Issues to November BallotBonnie King Salem-News.com Cannabis De-Classified
Will unincorporated Marion County turn their nose up at tax revenue?
(SALEM, Ore.) -
Measure 91 passed by approximately 56% to 44%. However, Marion County voters voted 48.44% in favor to 51.46% against. As such, state law allows the county to put the future expansion of recreational marijuana businesses to a vote.
Salem-News.com (Aug-03-2016 02:02)
Marijuana Robbery Leaves One Man Dead in North SalemBonnie King Salem-News.com
Three are behind bars as detectives investigate the fatal shooting.
(SALEM, Ore.) -
A report of shots fired brought officers to the 4800 block of Jean Court Northeast Monday morning, just after 8 a.m. When they arrived, they found one man with a single gunshot wound to the head, apparently an armed robbery-gone-wrong. The victim's 20-year old son was on the scene, and was detained for questioning.
| Next Page
Bonnie King
Salem-News.com Publisher
Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
Bonnie King`s career is unique, she is one of the few media professionals who has extensive time in four relevant areas; radio, television, newspaper and Internet. She has been with Salem-News.com since August 2004.
Her television career began in 1988, at Lincoln City, Oregon`s cable TV station, TV 10, in dual roles as News Anchor and Sales/Promotion Director. This was a natural evolution of her journalistic aspirations, since she was first "bit by the bug" while serving as Editor in Chief of her high school yearbook for two years. She graduated from Bassist College in Portland, Oregon in 1986.
Bonnie has interviewed legends like Aaron Spelling, Hugh Miles and Peter Frampton; Nadia Komenich, the feisty Judge Mills Lane, and the stars from CHARMED, FELICITY, ROSWELL, 7TH HEAVEN and BUFFY the VAMPIRE SLAYER. She has interviewed Oregon`s governors and congressmen, and she was part of the award-winning NBC news crew that first spoke to Evander Holyfield the night of the notorious Tyson ear-biting incident.
Her first full length documentary, `Fallen Fortress at Cape Lookout` aired on Oregon Public Broadcasting in 1993, for which she was the Producer. She is presently working on two Oregon based historical documentaries, and is an integral force in civil and human rights causes.
Bonnie has served in a number of positions in the broadcast industry; TV Production Manager at KVWB (Las Vegas WB) and Producer/Director for the TV series "Hot Wheels in Las Vegas" (2 seasons); TV Promotion Director for KYMA (NBC), and KFBT (Ind.); Asst. Marketing Director (SUPERSHOPPER MAGAZINE); Director/Co-Host (Coast Entertainment Show); Promotion Director (KBCH/KCRF Radio); and, Newspapers In Education/Circulation Sales Manager (STATESMAN JOURNAL NEWSPAPER).
Bonnie has a depth of understanding that reaches further than just behind the scenes, and that thoroughness of her nature is demonstrated in the perseverance to correctly present each story with the wit and wisdom necessary to compel and captivate viewers.
View articles written by Bonnie King
Quick Links
AUCTIONSAuction Masters & Appraisals
CONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and Contracting
SHERIDAN, Ore.
DININGWalery's Premium Pizza
Willamette Queen Sternwheeler
WINERIESEola Hills Winery
Alpha Alternative Solutions LLC
KUSH Dispensaries of Oregon
Advertise with Salem-NewsContact:
Contact: firstname.lastname@example.com | Copyright © 2016 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: email@example.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy