text:
Villa in Neo Chorio, Nr Latchi, Paphos - Beautiful Views Of Bay, Latchi Marina and the Akamas Gorge, 10 Minute Walk Neo Chorio Village, good restaurant nearby
Villa approx 45 minute drive from Paphos Airport. Situated 10 mins walk from Neo Chorio village which remains a pretty, traditional village with St Minas church, 2 tavernas, coffee shop, craft shop and a shop for basic groceries. Neo Chorio is a starting point for walks through the Akamas National Park, well known for the Bath of Aphrodite and beautiful quiet beaches some only accessible by boat, which can be hired at reasonable rates from the nearby harbour of Latchi, or take a day trip. The local beaches are uncrowded and shared by the luxury Anassa Hotel. Latchi harbour is a 5 minute drive with a choice of restaurants and shops. The town of Polis is a further 10 minute drive providing a larger choice of restaurants, bars, banks, fish market, large supermarket and various places of cultural interest. A car is recommended to explore the Troodos Mountains, play golf at one of the 3 world class golf courses, or visit the many tourist attractions in Paphos about 35 minutes drive. The villa comprises of a large open area, two twin bed bedrooms, which share a good size bathroom with bidet and a double bedroom with kingsize bed and en suite which also includes a bidet. The Kitchen has just been updated and is equipped to a much higher standard than the usual holiday let villa as I enjoy cooking and we do use the house. There is a covered area around the house giving a cool shady place to sit outside and either just sit with a glass enjoying the view or watch over the swimming pool. There is a large secluded patio area which we have a large table for dining during the balmy evenings, sun beds and sun umbrellas. The house faces East/West so there is plenty of sunshine but for those who want to escape you can go to the other side of the house and use the surrounding covered patio area facing the pool. The pool is not overlooked and also has lovely views.
Top Traveller Review
About the Owner
My husband and I bought a plot of land after one week's holiday in Polis. We loved the area so much and were very lucky to get a plot on the hills overlooking Latchi harbour. As we live in a Railway Cottage in a very secluded area in Sussex, it was important for us to have somewhere that was very scenic and quiet but close to nice restaurants. We thought the villa would provide us with a good escape from our teenage children but they have now all grown and are giving us an ever increasing number of grandchildren which, much to my husband's chagrin, I cannot leave for more that 3 weeks without believing they will forget me. Hence we just travel over for short breaks now. Leaving the villa available for rent a few weeks a year. We had the house built and have continued to ensure it is updated and well maintained to our standards which I can assure you are quite high.
Guestbook comments from the owner
Many of our guest are repeat bookings. Comments have been that although the area is quiet there is plenty to do close by.
3 Reviews
5 based on 3 holidaymaker reviews
A lovely villa in a lovely area. August is hot hot hot in Cyprus but the pool area has a cool breeze and stunning views. The beaches are pleasant but the area is a hotspot for locals during August. The Blue Lagoon is magicial. Lots of room for friends and family with a garden for BBQ and drinks. Air-con is a life saver and wi-fi worked fine. TV not great and car hire is strongly recommended. Shops in village ok but better ones are located in the harbour which is a 20 min walk there and 40 min walk on the way back up the hill with a few pauses for breath. We're looking to book again in September and cannot wait.
Unwind in comfort
We had a fabulous holiday staying at this modern, comfortable bungalow in Neo Chorio. It was very clean, well furnished and equipped and we liked the quiet location and uncrowded beaches nearby. The view of the bay from the terrace is stunning. The pool was great and is enclosed by railings, important if young children are with you. There are lots of things to do locally but you do need a car to get the most out of your holiday. We hope to come again soon.
A Great Villa with lovely views.
My wife & I had a brilliant holiday staying in this lovely villa, it was clean, well equipped and very comfortable in a quit peaceful location.
The pool area was just right for our needs with a lovely secluded patio area off to the side for those el fresco barbeques.
The fishing village of Latchi is just a short drive down the hill where you'll find lovely tavernas and restaurants.
The panoramic views over the bay are wonderful and one of the best bits is sitting on the terrace with a sundowner watching the sunset.
We would recommend this villa for your family holiday - thank you so much for letting us stay and we will be back.
From the Owner
"Latchi harbour is a 5 minute drive away and has plenty of village tavernas and beautiful yachts to ogle at, together with a bank and a few shops. Polis is a further 10 minutes drive with more facilities and a very good supermarket. I must not forget to mention opticians where glasses are approx half of the UK price. The beaches are quite stony but the fact they are quiet even during the high season is one of their high points to us. You can hire boats or take a leisure cruise, which includes an on board BBQ, to the Blue Lagoon which is a beautiful day out and you really can see fishes through the 6/10 ft of water. There are many hiking routes through the Akamas peninsular, a very beautiful nature reserve, where you can see many different bird and fauna."
Activity and Interests
Less than 5 minutes drive from the villa are beaches which although a little stoney are beautifully clear with the water remaining warm until November and are unspoilt by crowds who prefer the noise and sandy beaches of Coral Bay a 30 minute drive away. Turtles lay eggs on some local beaches - the nests are well marked to avoid damage. Within a few minutes drive you can find a beach taverna offering sun beds, shades and food but still peaceful.
The villa is approximately a 50 minute drive from Paphos airport and 2½ hours drive from Larnaca. Neo Chorio village is within walking distance but unless you are a keen walker I would recommend hiring a car to make the most of the surrounding area, especially if you are interested in seeing Droussia - a village populated by goats. It is a lovely drive to and through the Paphos Forest.
Neo Chorio is a 15 minute walk uphill, quicker coming down. Latchi harbour a 10 minute drive. 30 minutes walk. Polis 15 minutes drive. You can make a day trip driving to the Troodos Mountains or go by boat from Latchi to Paphos or the Blue Lagoon which is a lovely trip allowing time for swimming and a BBQ lunch on board the boat. There are many historical sites both locally and within the Paphos area and if you are interested it is worth visiting the Cyprus Tourist centre in Polis.
Further Details:
Neo Chorio's village store supplies all needs but I would recommend you go to Polis for a full supermarket shop if required. Banking facilities are available locally. Both Latchi and Polis have good sea food restaurants most of which also offer a wide range of other dishes, enabling you to sample many Cypriot delicacies and excellent well cooked basic dishes. A resume of local restaurants is available in the villa. I would recommend a one day trip is to the Koulos winery which offers an excellent tappas style lunch with an opportunity to taste their wine. We can recommend an excellent car hire company and/or collection from and to the airport.
Rental rates
|Rental Period
|Minimum Price
|Additional Nights
|Weekend Night
|Event Price
Rate 7
1 Dec 2016 - 31 Dec 2016
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 8
1 Jan 2017 - 28 Feb 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 9
1 Mar 2017 - 31 Mar 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 10
1 Apr 2017 - 30 Apr 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 1
1 May 2017 - 31 May 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 2
1 Jun 2017 - 30 Jun 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 3
1 Jul 2017 - 31 Aug 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 4
1 Sep 2017 - 30 Sep 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Rate 5
1 Oct 2017 - 31 Oct 2017
7 night minimum stay
for 7 nights
Additional pricing information
|No additional mandatory fees
Cancellation charges: 4-8 weeks 50% of rate refunded; 2-4 weeks 25% of rate refunded, less than 2 weeks no refund. I would therefore strongly recommend you take out adequate Travel insurance to cover your costs.
Changeover Day:
The changeover days and times are flexible to allow for guests to use various tour operators, all of whom arrive at different times. It will be necessary to discuss time to allow for cleaning etc when booking.
Notes on prices:
Discounts are available for two people and length of stay. For stays of 2 weeks we have a £100 discount.
Air Conditioning is available and for smaller groups a discount can be potentially applied.
Owner's Cancellation Policy
- 12
- Available arrival
- 12
- Available
- 12
- Unavailable
From the Owner
"The villa is situated on a hill just down from Neo Chorio village which has a beautiful church, a convenience store, bank (although this is situated in a living room), a coffee shop and two tavernas. The village is the beginning of the Akamas peninsula where many hikers travel to visit during the cooler months. I would recommend you do hire a car as there are many places to visit. We do occasionally walk to Latchi do remember you need to reserve some energy for the walk back up the hill. Having said that taxis are available and not too expensive. The villa has all facilities to make you holiday just as enjoyable if you never go out. The swimming pool has a beautiful view and the garden is secluded. The area is quiet and peaceful and seems to be loved by all who visit."
Property Type
- villa
- Away From It All
- Family
- Air Conditioning ...
- Ceiling Fans
- Hair Dryer
- Heating ...
- Internet ...
- Iron & Board
- Linens Provided ...
- Living Room ...
- Parking ...
- Towels Provided ...
- Washing Machine ...
- Coffee Maker ...
- Dishes & Utensils ...
- Dishwasher ...
- Freezer ...
- Kitchen ...
- Microwave ...
- Oven ...
- Refrigerator ...
- Hob ...
- Toaster ...
- Dining ...
- Dining Area
- Books ...
- DVD Player ...
- Games ...
- Music Library ...
- Satellite / Cable
- Stereo ...
- Television
Pool / Spa
- Private Pool ...
- children welcome ...
- non smoking only
- pets not allowed
- wheelchair inaccessible
Location Type
- beach
- near the sea
- rural
- village
- bay
- churches
- marina
- restaurants
- waterfalls
Leisure Activities
- bird watching
- walking
Local Services & Businesses
- ATM/bank
- groceries
- medical services
Sports & Adventure Activities
- cycling
- hiking
- snorkelling
- swimming
- Bathroom 1 - Toilet, Shower Enclosure, Bidet
- Bathroom 2 - Toilet, Bath with Shower, Shower Enclosure, Bidet
- En-suite to bedroom 1 with walk in shower, large hand basin, WC and bidet, wall cupboard and mirror and radiator. Bedrooms 2 and 3 share bathroom with bath/shower over, WC, bidet and large hand basin, cupboard and mirrors and radiator.
- 3 Bedrooms, Sleeps 6
- Bedroom 1
- Bedroom 2
- Bedroom 3
- Description of sleeping capacity: Sleeps 6 (3 Bedrooms) Notes on bedrooms: Bedroom 1 with king size bed. Bedroom 2 with twin beds (usually together to make double). Bedroom 3 with twin beds. All bedrooms have blinds, fly screens, shutters, fan, bedside table, lamp and fitted wardrobes with air conditioning units and radiator
- Terrace ...
- Golf ...
- Garden
- Barbecue
- Veranda ...
- Self-catering
- Notes on accommodation: Central heating throughout, air conditioning units in all rooms but for those who do not like air conditioning there are fans in every room. The swimming pool area is gated and can be locked but care should obviously be taken with young children. Outside: The private pool is the standard 8x4m with a side area for sun loungers etc. Although we are in a small road with 5 other houses the pool is secluded with oleander trees and other planting providing privacy. There is a well presented garden and patio area with a large table and six chairs for outside eating. It is very pleasant to breakfast on this patio as it is shaded in the mornings by a large carob tree. A BBQ is provided for this area together with a large sun shade. For eating or drinks in the evenings the garden lighting can be swiched on. The surrounding pool area is lit automatically. Should you wish to sit in the shade in the afternoon, there is a further seating area near entrance to house with large table and four reclining chairs overlooking the pool. Both seating areas have a wonderful view over the harbour of Latchi and the Akamas National Park with mountains in the distance. Cleaning / Towels / Linen / Maid service: Towels and linen supplied but please bring own beach towels. Property cleaned before arrival, thereafter weekly. Towels and bed linen changed weekly. Additional services available costs to be advised. Other: Patio overlooking pool with table and chairs, garden patio also with table and chairs. Garden lighting for night time eating.


text:
Clifford's Puppy Days
THE BIG SURPRISE/BE MY GUESTSeries Website »
Episode Guide »
Clifford tries to plan a party for Daffodil. and gets jealous of Norville when he moves in.
CommentsShare your thoughts, questions, and comments on "Clifford's Puppy Days" here.
Vermont PBS educates, informs, entertains and inspires Vermonters to be lifelong learners and engaged in their community.
Join our Vermont PBS Kids' Club!
PBS Kids - many videos and games for children!
Educator Resources - for teachers and parents.
PBS Parents - your child's first, best teacher.
Our weekly email newsletter highlighting upcoming shows and important station news. Sign up today!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- 3
Symbolism Behind Chinese Foods: From Birth to Death.
Food is one of the main elements of Chinese culture. Understandig the symbolism behind the dish and why it is served at a function enables one to better appreciate Chinese culture.
- 2
East Meets West Through Hub Pages.
Raine Law Yuen explores the the common and shared experiences of straddling two worlds East and West and provides insights as to how to navigate between these two seemingly opposite worlds.
- 2
Differences, Similarities & Intersections Between East and West.
Understanding the differences between Eastern and Western culture can help to improve relationships and facilitate a new world with the best of both world views.
- 0
Favorite Asian and Mixed Asian You Tubers
East Asians using You tube as a platform to showcase their talents provide entertainment with dynamic individualism, debunk historic stereotypes and redefine the modern Asian.
- 6
Shared Experiences of Overseas Born Chinese.
Overseas Born Chinese/East Asians residing in British Influenced regions such as USA, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa share similar histories, experiences, issues and challenges.
- 6
Raising Multi-Cultural Children in the 21st Century.
International forecast predict a multi-racial majority in the year USA and other multi-cultural societies. As parent whic values and culture do we instil into the likely leaders of the 21st century.
- 5
What Is Euro-Asian Art and Design?
As more people and communities find themselves at the crossroads between East and West, there is a greater need to define its expression. Art and design reflects the soul of the collective.
- 9
Teaching Children About Good and Evil
Uunderstanding the subtle realm of good and evil in a simple way regardless of spiritual faith.
- 3
How Children Learn and Develop Through Play.
A reference guide to learning how children learn through play, identifying key childhood developmental phases and selecting age appropriate toys and resources.
- 4
East-West: Best of Both - Culture for the 21st Century.
Interaction between East and West over time created a search for complementary ways to blend East -West wisdoms into a complementary whole which is today well established in all areas of culture.
- 14
How to Develop Super Intuition in The 21st Century.
Studies show that intuitive thinking is key to 21st century success. Why do we often ignore our intuition and how can we develop super intuition to be competitive in the 21st Century.
- 6
The Art of Prayer Between East and West In the 21st Century.
The modern world is a global village with integrative prayer based on the collective wisdom's of East and West becoming increasingly popular around the world.
- 2
How to Deal with Social Injustice & Prejudice.
When we fail to see the connection between our personal beliefs and how it connects to the collective to perpetuate social evil, we do an injustice to ourselves and all mankind.
- 4
How to Find Your Life Purpose And Keep It.
What is life purpose? does it exist and how do you find it and keep it.
- 8
Raising Multicultural Children: Best Parenting Styles
Parents from different ethnic backgrounds may differ in their views and methods of raising children. Is there a best practices method to raising children ? What do the experts & studies say?
- 6
Teaching Children to Value and Know Themselves.
Teaching Children about who they are on a soul level will help them to make the most of their potential and not be so quick to judge others when they realize that we are all on our own journey.
- 0
Facts About Being Part Asian (Eurasian/Hapa).
Studies indicate a steep incline in the Asian mixed-race population around the globe. Yet today there seems still to be a wide knowledge gap as to the meaning of mixed Asian & bi-racial identity.


text:
Acclaimed Queen of Surulere, Shodyreeks returns another impressive. love single titled You Garrit featuring Chocolate City's Mr Do Something, Koker
Produced by Echo for Knighthouse, You Garrit, a mid tempo love song is that joint to bump this season.
– Lalaboiy
For Music & Video Promotion, Hype, Website Design Contact: email@example.com Call or Whatsapp: +2347068771132, BBM: 2AFF1C94
ONE CLICK DOWNLOAD: You Garrit
The post Shodyreeks ft. Koker – You Garrit appeared first on notjustOk.
257 Total Views 3 Views Today


text:
Merrima Court Holidays places you next to Kings Beach and within a 10-minute walk of Caloundra Street Fair. This 15-room, 4-star apartment welcomes guests with conveniences like an outdoor pool, free in-room WiFi, and free self parking. It's on the boardwalk and also a short walk from Bulcock Beach and Caloundra Events Center.
The 15 air-conditioned apartments feature kitchens and balconies, and there's space to spread out with living rooms. Flat-screen TVs come with cable channels and DVD players, and guests can stay connected with free WiFi. Bathrooms have hair dryers and free toiletries. Washers/dryers, coffee makers, and ironing boards are also standard. Weekly housekeeping is available.
Property features
Guests of Merrima Court Holidays enjoy features like an outdoor pool, free WiFi in public areas, and a library. You can take advantage of free parking, along with an airport shuttle for a fee (available 24 hours). The front desk is staffed 24/7 to help with dry cleaning/laundry, tours or tickets, and luggage storage. Additional amenities include laundry facilities, a garden, and barbecue grills.
- Free WiFi in rooms and public areas
- Free parking
- Outdoor pool
- Laundry facilities
Merrima Court Holidays
Hotel Amenities
Room Amenities
Merrima Court Holidays offers 15 air-conditioned accommodations with washers/dryers and DVD players. Rooms open to balconies. Accommodations offer separate living rooms and include desks. Accommodations at this 4-star apartment have kitchens with full-sized refrigerators/freezers, stovetops, microwaves, and cookware/dishes/utensils. Bathrooms include showers, complimentary toiletries, and hair dryers.
Guests can surf the web using the complimentary wireless high-speed Internet access. Flat-screen televisions come with premium cable channels and pay movies. Additionally, rooms include coffee/tea makers and irons/ironing boards. Housekeeping is provided weekly.
- Premium TV channels
- DVD player
- Pay movies
- Balcony
- Air conditioning
- Coffee/tea maker
- Kitchen
- Microwave
- Weekly housekeeping provided
- Private bathroom
- Free toiletries
- Hair dryer
- Shower only
- Iron/ironing board
- Desk
- Separate living room
- Cookware, dishware, and utensils
- Washer/dryer
- Cable TV service
- Flat-panel TV
- Free WiFi
- Dishwasher
- Full-sized refrigerator/freezer
- Stovetop
- Cribs/infant beds (surcharge)
- Rollaway/extra beds (surcharge)
Hotel Amenities
Merrima Court Holidays features an outdoor pool, a library, and tour/ticket assistance. High-speed wireless Internet access is complimentary. For a surcharge, a roundtrip airport shuttle (available 24 hours) is offered to guests. This Kings Beach apartment also offers barbecue grills, a garden, and laundry facilities. Complimentary self parking is available on site. A total renovation of this property was completed in May 2016.
- 24-hour front desk
- Airport transportation (surcharge)
- Total number of rooms - 15
- Barbecue grill(s)
- Dry cleaning/laundry service
- Elevator/lift
- Tours/ticket assistance
- Free WiFi
- Laundry facilities
- Library
- Garden
- Luggage storage
- Free parking nearby
- Year Built 1985
- Free self parking
- Outdoor pool
Family Friendly Amenities
- Family Hotel
- Outdoor pool
- Separate living room
- Free Wi-Fi
- Kitchen
- Laundry facilities
- Washer/dryer
- Full-sized refrigerator/freezer
- Microwave
- DVD player
Available in all rooms: Free WiFi
Available in some public areas: Free WiFi
Free self parking, Free parking nearby
If you have requests for specific accessibility needs, please note them at check-out when you book your room.
- Accessible bathroom
- In-room accessibility
Nearby Things to Do
Recreational amenities at the apartment include an outdoor pool.
The recreational activities listed below are available either on site or nearby; fees may apply.
- Bicycle rentals nearby
Hotel Policies
You need to know
Extra-person charges may apply and vary depending on property policy.
Government-issued photo identification and a credit card or cash deposit are required at check-in for incidental charges.
Special requests are subject to availability upon check-in and may incur additional charges. Special requests cannot be guaranteed.
Only service animals are allowed
24-hour check-in
Children and extra beds
- Children are welcome.
- Rollaway/extra beds are available for AUD 15.00 per night.
- Cribs (infant beds) are available for AUD 15.00 per night.
Minimum check-in age is 18
Special check-in instructions:
Check-out time is 10 AM
Payment types
Optional extras
- Crib (infant bed) fee: AUD 15.00 per night
- Rollaway bed fee: AUD 15.00 per night
We should mention
This property's policy is to refuse certain bookings for the purpose of group events or parties, including pre-wedding stag/bachelor and hen/bachelorette parties. This property offers transfers from the airport (surcharges may apply). Guests must contact the property with arrival details before travel, using the contact information on the booking confirmation.
Hotel Name
- Merrima Court Holidays Apartment Kings Beach
- Merrima Court Holidays Apartment
- Merrima Court Holidays Kings Beach
- Merrima Court Holidays
- Pets not allowed (service animals welcome)
Awards & Affiliations
- The property is a member of the Small Luxury Hotels of the World.
National Rating
This property has been awarded a star rating from the Australian Star Ratings Agency, Star Ratings Australia.


text:
Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
Pornography, Women, And the Digital Revolution
Digital technologies have gone through a revolutionary period of development over the past twenty or so years. Some say that the digital revolution is helping to facilitate participatory democracy; some say it will "sweep aside the gatekeepers, allowing free expression and broad access to information"; but on the other hand this revolution has the potential to corrupt innocent children by exposing them to "video game violence, pornography and cybersex" (Jenkins). Which outcome is more likely and where do women fit into this digital picture when it comes to online users' interest in and access to provocative (often naked or near-naked) images of their bodies? More to the point: a) How has technology changed the way society thinks about pornography; b) how does pornography impact the sexual identity of women; and c) why do some women consume pornography and swear by it? This paper delves into these questions and makes evidence-based arguments vis-a-vis the growing presence of online pornography.
How is pornography defined?
First of all, before tackling that question, there is a need to define pornography, which in itself is not an easy task. The Oxford Dictionaries offers this definition: "Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate the erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings." Does that describe provocative images used in advertising by American Apparel? That question will be addressed in this paper. Moreover, when the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Potter Stewart, was faced with a decision on pornography (or "obscenity," as it was referred to in 1973), he said that "…perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly…" defining it. "But I know it when I see it," he added (www.nap.edu).
Gender Research: Males and females make use of online pornography
A 2012 peer-reviewed article in the journal Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity first of all shatters the myth that online pornography and erotica is viewed mainly by males. In fact one in three visitors to adult websites (where pornography is free and available) are women, and 70% of those women report that they keep their online sexual activities "a secret" (Corley, et al., 2012). Of those women who visit pornographic sites, 17% say they are "…struggling with pornography addiction" -- and 13% say they even access pornography while at work (Corley, 57).
What do the majority of men use online pornography for? Corley asserts that the "number one reason" men visit provocative sites "…is to aid in arousal for masturbation" (57). On the other hand, women "…more commonly utilize chat rooms with sexual or erotic narratives for fantasy and to seek out a partner" (Corley, 57).
Gender is indeed a factor in online pornographic visits: a) males visit pornographic sites at a younger age than women; b) males are more apt to report being aroused by sexually explicit materials online; and c) women report that the "primary reason they use sexual media" is to aid in "lovemaking with their partners or in response to requests by their partner"; d) women find pornographic online materials "acceptable or positive" when and if it is associated with "a shared sexual activity"; e) males report they receive "more sexual enjoyment" when they are using pornographic images alone (masturbation); f) some women also "seek out pornography for masturbation, assisting in fantasizing for arousal and curiosity"; and g) women between the ages of 35-49 had more cybersex experiences than did men in the same age category (Corley, 58).
Corley and colleague report on a survey of 525 females that were part of the Women's Sexuality Survey and 91% of the women were heterosexual (60). When the results of this online survey were presented, the authors report that about half of the sample of 525 females described themselves as either "addicted to sex" (19.3%) or involved in a love relationships (33.8%) (63). Of those in the "female sex and love addicts" (FSLA) category 13.7% said they engaged in cybersex activities online; 49.3% of the FSLA women had been subjected to childhood sexual abuse and 53% of FSLA women had been exposed to pornography as children (Corley, 63).
In this regard, the hypothesis that the authors came up with was straightforward: those women who had been sexually abused as children or who were exposed to pornography as children would be "more likely to identify being addicted to sex or love/relationships" than those that were not abused as children and weren't exposed to pornography. That hypothesis was in fact supported by the research results (Corley, 66).
As to how many hours a week the FSLA women spend engaged in cybersex, participants reported an average of 23.80 hours a week online per se and 2.48 hours a week engaged in cybersex behaviors. Moreover, 61.1% of FSLA respondents said they had suffered from depression as a result of their sexual behavior and 6.7% had actually attempted suicide because of their sexual behaviors and 51.5% reported "withdrawal symptoms" as a result of their sexual activities online (Corley, 63).
What is depicted in the content of online pornography?
An article in the Journal of Sex Research points out that the results of a national survey show that 25% of men, and 4% of women nationwide had visited a "sexually explicit Web site in the previous month" (Vannier, et al., 2014). And the majority of males in college (72%) and a sizable minority of college females (23%) had gone into online sex sites to view pornographic videos, the research showed (Vannier, 253). Also, interviews conducted using qualitative strategies (similar to what Attwood alluded to earlier in this paper) reflect the following: people use pornography as a "source of new ideas, a means to increase arousal, or a way to open up communication with a partner" (Vannier, 254).
But what is the content of those videos that college students and others are viewing? On page 254 the results of a survey of what is depicted in 45 videos in 15 popular adult Web sites is published. The results show that: a) 76% of actors are Caucasian; b) 61% of the videos were professionally produced; c) 56% of the videos featured two actors and 16% had a lone female actor; d) in 90% of the 45 videos there was "genital stimulation"; e) in 79% of the videos there was fellatio; and f) there was vaginal intercourse in 68% of the videos (Vannier, 254).
As to kissing (50%), female masturbation (38%), cunnilingus (37%), male masturbation (13%) and anal intercourse (32%), there was far less of these sexual activities than those mentioned in the previous paragraph (Vannier, 254).
Since these pornographic Web sites are so easy to access and so often visited by teens and adults as well, it is interesting to note how males and females are depicted. One of the points of this paper is that women enjoy pornographic materials -- albeit on a different level than men -- and that there is a great misunderstanding (and myth) that pornographic sites cause men to become violent and to look down on women.
Previous research into the actual content of pornographic videos online (videos produced between 1979 and 1988) shows that males have "greater access to power than female actors," and that women are shown as "sexually naive…and are victims of sexual coercion or seduction" and women have "more attractive bodies than men" (Vannier, 255). As time went on there were more videos of men being seduced by women, and of men engaging in sexual acts with women of "higher social status" (Vannier, 255).
That having been pointed out, the authors point out that in almost every case of the more recent research into pornographic content, in every case where there was persuasion, one actor displayed reluctance but in the end was convinced to participate and "appeared to enjoy the sexual activity they had originally resisted" (Vannier, 262).
As porn creeps into mainstream advertising, is it wrong to label pornography as harmful and degrading?
Meanwhile Professor Feona Attwood, a well-respected and widely-quoted researcher into contemporary sexual themes, new technologies and online sexually-motivated cultures, points out that images that once were considered pornographic are today uses as substantial parts of advertising campaigns. This paper delves into the use of pornography in mainstream advertising and links those images to what scholars are saying about online pornography. For example, Attwood isn't the only scholar that links fashion advertising campaigns with today's more liberated online user; Terri Schauer writes in the journal Sexuality & Culture that some of today's fashion photography "…sexualizes and objectifies women" (Schauer, 2005, p. 45).
Women were certainly sexualized and objectified in a number of very provocative ads promoted by American Apparel, a company that has been banned from advertising in the United Kingdom due to the use of a model who looked to be no more than 16 years of age. A photo in AdWeek shows a model topless (with her left hand covering her breasts) which is not so terribly provocative, but her pants are unzipped…[continue]
"How Pornography Has Changed Because Of The Internet" (2014, May 21) Retrieved November 30, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/how-pornography-has-changed-because-of-the-189349
"How Pornography Has Changed Because Of The Internet" 21 May 2014. Web.30 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/how-pornography-has-changed-because-of-the-189349>
"How Pornography Has Changed Because Of The Internet", 21 May 2014, Accessed.30 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/how-pornography-has-changed-because-of-the-189349
This is what creates confusion in the minds of young and vulnerable people." (p. 1) Concerning this vulnerability, our research suggests that upon entering an adolescent age, individuals who are not yet emotionally or intellectually prepared for the responsibilities of sexual engagement are yet beginning to experience emotions hinting at this impulse. Schwartz warns that encounters with explicit and potentially deviant materials such as those which may incorporate violence, exploitation,
Internet censorship could also result in job losses since a court order may compel online search engines in America to block results or domain names. This could contribute to the instant death of some companies, particularly those with limited resources to fight potential legal cases. In addition, concerns have also been raised regarding the possibility of Internet censorship to weaken the protection provided by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that
Internet started way back 3 to 4 decades, but it really took the world by storm through the 90's and till now it has become one of the main assets of modern day computer user. More people get the information through Internet, especially those who use it than by any other means. The world has become a cyber village where simply anyone from anywhere can communicate with other person living
' Purchasing agents can place orders, gather information, and communicate with different organizations from any place at any time" (Martin & Hafer, p. 41). Following the introduction of the Internet, many purchasing departments and purchasing representatives were better able to engage in direct communications, order taking and fulfillment as well as the provision of technical support with their business counterparts abroad (Martin & Hafer, 2002). These authors add that, "The
Some sociologists and feminist scholars see pornography as an industry that objectifies women -- the large majority of heterosexual porn focuses on the needs of the man, and women are really little more than sexual objects. The industry itself is set up someone like prostitution, according to this view. People are paid to have sex on camera for the viewing pleasures of others. Indeed, pornography sets up an unrealistic
English Comp How Pornography Promotes Sexual Violence Against Women Pornography, like rape, is a male invention, designed to dehumanize women, to reduce the female to an object of sexual access, not to free sensuality from moralistic or parental inhibition.... Pornography is the undiluted essence of anti-female propaganda. Susan Brownmiller, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape Defining and regulating pornography has been a difficult task for the United States where free speech is protected
Is pornography a result of a general degrading of our culture, or is our culture degrading because of many factors, including increased violence and the prevalence of more violent forms of media, including pornography? As the use of the Internet has grown and developed, more studies have been conducted to try to answer those nagging questions. Several studies have looked at the "third-person effect" of Internet pornography. Basically, the third-person


text:
Scarf? has no description.
Scarf??s rise to fame came in early January with his remix of Alt J?s classic ?Breezeblocks? which has now surpassed 750k plays on Soundcloud and has gained support from the likes of Vanic. He has recently released his first solo EP labeled ?Love? which features the hit song ?Breezeblocks? and has just finished his first original single, ?Want What We On feat. Kings & Mayzin?. Notable influences include Flume, ODESZA, and WhereIsAlex but Scarf? defines his sound as urban with a emphasis on being distinctive. With his current releases, there seems to be no stopping the young producer and he is defiantly one to watch in 2016.
Scarf? revamped the song "Breezeblocks" from alt-J, giving the song has a entire new vibe and we knew right away this was really #tipsy
Thought Id do a quick flip of @wearegalantis New track 'No Money' Absolute Tune.
Nas x Scarf?


text:
May 23, 2013
Legislation raising New Hampshire's tax on diesel and gasoline has been voted down by the state Senate after being passed in the House earlier.
In an 18-6 vote, the chamber downed the 12 cents per gallon hike and also blocked all discussion of it when the Senate meets with the House later on for state budget talks.
Because of how the Senate voted, the bill cannot be considered again in the current two-year session. However, lawmakers could consider alternative plans to pay for such improvements.
The bill was designed to pay for improvements to state roads and bridges. It called for increasing the diesel tax over six years, by 2 cents annually, and the gasoline tax over three years, by 4 cents annually.
We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.
The expert, Shawn Whitacre from Chevron Delo, will answer your questions
The expert, Steve Carlson from Xantrex, will answer your questions
The expert, Brian Fletcher from Eaton, will answer your questions
On the Spot: Drive the Future With Volvo's SuperTruck [Video]
Highlights From ATA Management Conference & Exhibition [Video]
Navistar's Las Vegas LT Series Launch Presentation [Video]
Test Drive Preview: Freightliner's 2018 Cascadia [Video]
Tool Designed to Remove Tie Rods and Ball Joints
Driver Wellness Courses Address 3 Key Concerns
Power Converter Features Waterproof Design
Tool Caddy Can Store 100 Pounds of Gear


text:
Check in from 15h / Check out prior to 12h
Howard Johnson Fredericksburg South: Find photos, reviews, information, amenities and compare prices for 2 stars hotels in Fredericksburg, United States.
Howard Johnson Fredericksburg South offers a comfortable setting while in Fredericksburg. It features a gym, as well as a playground, luggage storage and a 24-hour reception.
Hotel description
There are a range of facilities on offer to those staying at Howard Johnson, including conference rooms, a wake-up service and a games room.
Rooms are comfortable and provide all the essentials, including a coffee maker, a refrigerator and a private bathroom. They all feature a flat-screen TV, ironing facilities and heating.
A satisfying breakfast is available for purchase, and there are numerous restaurants and cafés close by.
The hotel provides easy access to Central Park and Spotsylvania Towne Centre. Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park, University of Mary Washington and George Washington's Ferry Farm are around a 20-minute drive away.
Hotel features
Air Conditioned, Refrigerator, Cable / Satellite TV, Coffee / Tea Maker, Microwave, Hair Dryer, TV, En suite, Private Bathroom, Vending Machines
24 Hour Reception, Conference Room(s), Wake-up Service, Luggage Storage
Fitness Room/Gym, Playground
Private Toilet, Games Available
Availability and Prices
Booking Site
Room Type
Per room
Per night
Per night
Users who viewed Howard Johnson Fredericksburg South also viewed these 2 stars Fredericksburg hotels:
Days Inn Fredericksburg North
14 Simpson Ln, Fredericksburg
14 Simpson Ln, Fredericksburg
Econo Lodge Fredericksburg (Virginia)
5321 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Fredericksburg
5321 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Fredericksburg
Hampton Inn & Suites Celebrate Fredericksburg
1080 Hospitality Lane, Fredericksburg
1080 Hospitality Lane, Fredericksburg
Search hotels
based on


text: Buy & Sell Listing - Want to SellWhat item(s) are you looking to sell? MMF1 43 to m43 adaptor Where are you located? Australia What is your asking price? If selling multiple items, enter the asking price for the primary item here, and indicate prices of other items in the "Describe in detail" section below AUD 99 Which of the following describes your sale? (Choose all that apply) Not open to trade offers Where will you ship to? Worldwide What form(s) of payment will you accept? Regular PayPal (fee included in price) What shipping method will you use? Registered How much do you charge for shipping? free What is your handling time? (Time taken to package and drop off the item(s) for shipment) two business days List any external references such as your Ebay or FredMiranda username: - Describe in detail the item(s) you want to sell, trade, or buy. Include any additional comments or details in this section Hi guys I have this MMF1 adaptor which is brandnew and comes in box . I can ship anywhere in the world for AUD 99 .Shipping is free. Cheers Bhupinder Check the box to acknowledge that you have read and agree to the Buy and Sell rules I have read and agree to the Buy and Sell rules. Use the attachment manager below to attach any images for this listing (max dimension: 1024px) -


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
decided: December 1, 1975.
COMMONWEALTHv.BETRES, APPELLANT
Appeal from judgment of sentence of Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, June T., 1974, No. 134, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Peter Betres.
A. R. Cingolani, Jr., with him August T. Costanzo, and Cingolani & Cingolani, for appellant.
Robert F. Hawk, First Assistant District Attorney, with him John H. Brydon, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Watkins, P. J., Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van der Voort, and Spaeth, JJ. Opinion by Cercone, J.
[ 237 Pa. Super. Page 363]
This appeal arises from the conviction of Peter Betres on various gambling charges. The relevant facts are as follows. On February 10, 1972, Betres and another individual purchased the land and building owned and occupied by the German Beneficial Society of Lyndora, Pennsylvania. The German Club had been in existence since 1910 and was governed by its own officers. It owned a liquor license and was primarily an "after-hours" social club and drinking establishment. After the purchase Betres and his partner leased back the property to the German Club. Betres often visited the club, became a member and lent his assistance to the club; exactly how much control Betres exerted over the club will be discussed more specifically at a later point.
In early December, 1973, Larry Riley, a Pennsylvania State Police Officer, visited the club for the express purpose of determining if any illegal gambling was taking place. On December 21, 1973, he returned and purchased a membership. He visited the club eight times between December, 1973, and March 10, 1974, often taking a fellow officer with him as a guest. During these visits he saw no hint of gambling.
On March 10, 1974, Officer Riley again visited the club; he was accompanied this time by Officer Shaffer. During this visit Officer Riley engaged in several pool games with Betres upon the outcome of which wagers were made. On the morning of March 17, 1974 at approximately 3:45 A.M. Officers Riley and Shaffer were again at the club standing next to the pool table when Betres stated "Stick around. We're going to shoot dice." Betres then took towels and placed them in the pockets of the pool table and began a game called "over and under." Betres placed two cards on the table; an eight of diamonds on one side and a six of clubs on the other. The idea of the game was to bet that the rolled dice would be either eight or above or six or below. If, for example, one
[ 237 Pa. Super. Page 364]
wished to bet that the rolled dice would be eight or above, the bettor would place a wager on the side of the pool table closest to the eight of diamonds and if, in fact, the dice roll was eight or above, Betres would pay all the persons on the high side the amount of their wagers and take the money from bettors on the low side of the table. If the dice roll resulted in seven, Betres would take all the money on the table. Without the aid of complex mathematical reasoning it can be seen that one person was more likely to win than the others, i.e., the person conducting the game, which in this case was Betres. Officers Riley and Shaffer participated in the over and under game for about an hour and then left.
A week later on March 30, 1974, the German Club was raided by the police, who found no evidence of gambling or gambling paraphernalia at that time. Betres was arrested, tried by a jury, and convicted of violating subsections (a)(2), (a)(3) and (a)(4) of Section 5513 of the Crimes Code.*fn1 Motions for a new trial and arrest of judgment were argued and denied, and Betres was sentenced to 6 to 12 months imprisonment and fined $1,500.00. Betres now appeals to this court raising several issues.
The first issue which we will consider is whether the lower court should have sustained all or any part of appellant's demurrer to the evidence. Because appellant was convicted of three subsections of Section 5513, each
[ 237 Pa. Super. Page 365]
of which prohibits a distinct type of behavior, we must examine them individually. Subsection (a)(2) prohibits one from allowing "persons to collect and assemble for the purpose of unlawful gambling at any place under his control."*fn2 While it is true that Betres was neither an officer nor a director of the German Club, there are several facts which tend to show that Betres did, in fact, exercise control over the German Club. On the night of the raid, March 30, 1974, Officers Riley and Shaffer went to the club before the raid began. Officer Riley's testimony as to what happened at that time is as follows:
"Trooper Shaffer and I went to the club before the raiding begun. [sic] We walked up to the door. There is a little lookout by the door. Mr. Betres looked out, saw us and said, 'Go away. There's a car in the parking lot. I don't know who it is. There are people sitting in it.' He said, 'Come back when those people leave.' Trooper Shaffer and I turned around and walked back to the road. When we got to the road, the car started up and pulled out. At this time we walked back to the club. Mr. Betres said, 'Who were they?' We said, 'We don't know. It is dark. We couldn't see them.' We went inside the club. We were sitting at the bar and Mr. Betres and the doorman kept a constant lookout through that hole the whole time that Trooper Shaffer and I were in there before the raiding party came."
The fact that Betres could deny entrance to the club is a strong indicator of control. When this is coupled with the testimony of Officers Riley and Shaffer to the effect that, from their observations, Betres was in control of the club, that Betres did run the dice game and that Betres was the owner of the property, we must conclude that there was sufficient evidence upon which the jury could find that Betres was in control.
[ 237 Pa. Super. Page 366]
Subsection (a)(3) makes it a crime if one "solicits or invites any person to visit any unlawful gambling place for the purpose of gambling."*fn3 The Commonwealth's evidence as to solicitation is not strong. The only evidence consisted of the following statement made on March 17, 1974, by Betres: "Stick around. We're going to shoot dice." Betres did not solicit or invite anyone to visit the German Club for the purpose of gambling. The persons to whom the statement was addressed were already at the club. Therefore, we must agree with Betres' argument that there was insufficient evidence to convict him as to subsection (a)(3).
Subsection (a)(4) makes it a crime if one "being the owner, tenant, lessee or occupant of any premises, knowingly permits or suffers the same, or any part thereof, to be used for the purpose of unlawful gambling."*fn4 Betres was the owner of the property which housed the German Club; this was proved by Commonwealth's Exhibit No. 1, the deed which granted to Betres the land and building in question, and he clearly knew of the activity taking place, in that he himself conducted it. The evidence is therefore clearly sufficient to find that Betres was the owner and was in control of the German Club.
The second issue which we will consider is whether Section 5513(a)(2), (a)(3) and (a)(4) is so vague as to be unconstitutional. Appellant's primary objection to the statute is the use of the terms "unlawful gambling" and "unlawful gambling place." Appellant contends that these terms are unclear because gambling in itself is not unlawful in Pennsylvania. See Commonwealth v. Manuszak, 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 (1944); Commonwealth v. Zotter, 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 296 (1938); Commonwealth v. Chaitt, 53 Lan. Rev. 390, aff'd 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 318, 380 Pa. 532, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 829 (1953); Commonwealth v. Aversano, 67 D. & C. 371 (1948); and,
[ 237 Pa. Super. Page 367]
racing.*fn8 When the term unlawful gambling was used by the legislature they could have intended no other meaning than gambling not specifically authorized by the Commonwealth. This reasonable common sense interpretation is supported by Section 5512 of the Crimes Code.*fn9 That section which deals with lotteries defines the term "unlawful" as follows, "As used in this section the term 'unlawful' means not specifically authorized by law." There is no reason why the legislature would have intended "unlawful" to have any different meaning in Section 5513 than it was given in Section 5512. Therefore, the term "unlawful," as used in Section 5513, means "not specifically authorized by law." A person who owns or who is in control of an establishment such as contemplated by the statute, and who conducts any type of gambling therein, except, of course, gambling authorized by law, may be prosecuted under this section.
The third issue to be considered concerns certain incorrect statements made by the lower court to the effect that gambling in itself was unlawful. Appellant wanted the lower court to explain that gambling in itself was not against the law so that, if the jury felt that appellant was at the German Club as a patron, rather than as an owner or a person in control, it might acquit him. This argument is irrelevant in that, as was discussed above, appellant was clearly shown to be the owner and in control of the club and, therefore, whether the jury additionally viewed him as a patron was unimportant.
Appellant raises several other issues which do not warrant discussion. Thus, appellant's conviction as to subsections (a)(2) and (a)(4) of Section 5513 is affirmed and his conviction as to subsection (a)(3) is
[ 237 Pa. Super. Page 369]
reversed. Because the basis of the sentence is unclear on the record, this case is remanded so a determination can be made as to whether an adjustment in appellant's sentence should be made in light of the reversal of subsection (a)(3).
It is so ordered.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part and case remanded.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
August 3, 2009
LEON ALLEN AND LAWRENCE WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFFS,v.DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA, PETER DAILEY, ROBERTITO FONTAN, JOSEPH GEORGE, RICHARD T. GRAMLICH, LEWIS B. PALMER, KAREN HEYWARD, JOHN MCCONNELL, JOHN DOE, AND RICHARD ROE DEFENDANTS.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) filed by Defendants the District Attorney's Office of Philadelphia, Peter Dailey, Robertito Fontan, Joseph George, Richard T. Gramlich, Lewis B. Palmer, Karen Heyward, John McConnell, John Doe, and Richard Roe ("Defendants"), and the Response of Plaintiffs Leon Allen and Lawrence Williams ("Plaintiffs") (Docket No. 24). For the reasons stated below, Defendants' Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
On March 4, 2008, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against the City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson, Police Officer John Doe, and Police Officer Richard Roe alleging that Defendants engaged in a unlawful search and seizure that deprived Plaintiffs of their due process rights "in violation of the Fourth, Fifth, Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983." (Compl. ¶ 15.) Plaintiffs also assert that in the process of depriving them of their property, Defendants inflicted $2,500.00 worth of damage to their home's outside door. (Id. ¶ 13.) Plaintiffs also raised a second claim alleging "unlawful seizure and taking of property under the laws and Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania." (Id. ¶ 18.) Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on September 23, 2008, adding the District Attorney's Office of Philadelphia as a Defendant. (Am. Compl. ¶ 5.) Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint on March 11, 2009. This iteration of the Complaint added the following Defendants: Peter Dailey; Robertito Fontan; Joseph George; Richard T. Gramlich; Lewis B. Palmer; Karen Heyward; and John McConnell. (Sec. Am. Compl. ¶ 6.)
By stipulation the parties agreed to dismiss Defendants City of Philadelphia and Sylvester Johnson. (Docket No. 21.) The remaining Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiffs timely filed their response.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND*fn1
On March 28, 2007, detectives from the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's Dangerous Drug Offenders Unit were tasked with sealing two homes forfeited due to ongoing, illegal drug activity at each residence. (Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J. 2; Defs.' Mot. Summ. J. 2 (citing Ex. A., List of Home Sealings for week of Mar. 26, 2007).) The second home to be sealed was located at 2637 West Silver Street (Id.) After seizing the first property, the officers commenced their efforts to seal 2637 West Silver Street. Between eight or nine o'clock in the morning, Officer Dailey arrived at the 2600 block of West Silver Street, saw a house, and noticed activity at the home including "people walking in and out of the house with bottles of beer." (Defs.' Mot. Summ. J.; Ex. B, Deposition of Peter C. Dailey ("Dailey Dep.") 12:1-3, Mar. 11, 2009.) At this time, Officer Dailey exited his car, approached the property, and knocked on the door of the house where he had seen people with beer bottles. (Id. at 12:15-22.) It is at this point that the deposition testimony of Defendant Dailey and Plaintiff Allen differ somewhat, yet the basic contours of their statements are the same -- detectives arrived at the home seeking permission to enter, they were granted admission to the residence, and ordered everyone out of the house because it had been forfeited. See (Id., Dailey Dep. 17:11-18:20.; Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J.; Ex. 1, Deposition of Leon Allen ("Allen Dep.") 22:14-23:25, Mar. 5, 2009.)
Allen claims that a neighbor, seeing the commotion, asked to see the list of homes to be sealed, and upon reading the list, informed the detectives that: (a) they were sealing the wrong home, 2636 West Silver Street; and (b) the home to be seized, 2637 West Silver Street, which was clearly numbered, was directly across the street. (Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J., Allen Dep. 24:21-25:9.)
The detectives assert that this mistake*fn2 -- the eviction, discovery of their error, and the occupants re-entry into 2636 W. Silver Street only took a few minutes. See (Defs.' Mot. Summ. J.; Dailey Dep. 24:22-25:3; Defs.' Mot. Summ. J.; Ex. E, Deposition of John McConnell ("McConnell Dep."), 25:14-26:13, Mar. 11, 2009.) Conversely, Plaintiffs assert that they were evicted for a "couple of hours." (Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J; Allen Dep. 27:7-9; Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J; Ex. 2, Deposition of Lawrence Williams ("Williams Dep."), 17:19-25, Mar. 5, 2009.)
Summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c). A factual dispute is "material" only if it might affect the outcome of the case. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). For there to be a "genuine" issue, a reasonable fact-finder must be able to return a verdict in favor of the non-moving party. (Id.)
On summary judgment, it is not the court's role to weigh the disputed evidence and decide which is more probative, or to make credibility determinations. Boyle v. County of Allegheny, PA, 139 F.3d 386, 393 (3d Cir. 1998) (citing Petruzzi's IGA Supermarkets, Inc. v. Darling-Del. Co. Inc., 998 F.2d 1224, 1230 (3d Cir. 1993.) Rather, the court must consider the evidence, and all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348 (1986) (citing United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962)); Tigg Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp., 822 F.2d 358, 361 (3d Cir. 1987). If a conflict arises between the evidence presented by both sides, the court must accept as true the allegations of the non-moving party, and "all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor." Anderson, 477 U.S. at 255.
Although the moving party bears the initial burden of showing an absence of a genuine issue of material fact, it need not "support its motion with affidavits or other similar materials negating the opponent's claim." Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). It can meet its burden by "pointing out . . . that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's claims." (Id. at 325.) Once the movant has carried its initial burden, the opposing party "must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to material facts." Matsushita Elec., 475 U.S. at 586. "There must be sufficient evidence for a jury to return a verdict in favor of the non-moving party; if the evidence is merely colorable or not significantly probative, summary judgment should be granted." Arbruster v. Unisys Corp., 32 F.3d 768, 777 (3d Cir. 1994), abrogated on other grounds, Showalter v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Med. Center, 190 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 1999).
Qualified immunity is "'an entitlement not to stand trial or face the other burdens of litigation.'" Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 200 (2001) (quoting Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985)). "Most public officials are entitled only to qualified immunity" from section 1983 actions. Yarris v. County of Delaware, 465 F.3d 120, 135 (3d. Cir. 2006); see Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259, 273 (1993) (noting that ordinarily, "[q]ualified immunity represents the norm.") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Whether to grant qualified immunity is a question for the court, not the jury, and should be decided early in the proceedings so that the defendant may avoid the burdens of litigation. Saucier, 533 U.S. at 200-01. The Court explained that "[t]he concern of the immunity inquiry is to acknowledge that reasonable mistakes can be made . . . If the officer's mistake as to what the law requires is reasonable, however, the officer is entitled to the immunity defense." Id. at 205.
Saucier articulated a two-step analysis to determine whether a Section 1983 defendant is entitled to qualified immunity. First, the court must determine whether "'[t]aken in the light most favorable to the party asserting the injury . . . the facts alleged show the officer's conduct violated a constitutional right[.]'" Hubbard v. Taylor, 538 F.3d 229, 231 (3d Cir. 2008) (quoting Saucier, 533 U.S. at 201).*fn3 If so, the court must then determine "whether the right was clearly established." Id. In considering the second prong of the Saucier test, the Third Circuit clarified that "[a] right is clearly established for the purposes of qualified immunity when its contours are 'sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.'" Hubbard, 538 F.3d at 236 (quoting Williams v. Bitner, 455 F.3d 186, 191 (3d Cir. 2006)). This standard "'gives ample room for mistaken judgments by protecting all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.'" Id. (quoting Gilles v. Davis, 427 F.3d 197, 207 (3d Cir. 2005)).
Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code offers private citizens a means to redress violations of federal law by state officials. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The statute provides, in part, that:
[e]very person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress . . . .
Id. Recovery under § 1983, requires a showing of two elements: (1) defendants acted under color of state law; and (2) their actions deprived the plaintiff of a right secured by the Constitution or federal statutes. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40, 49-50 (1999). The Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause shields individuals from the government's arbitrary action. County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 845 (1998).
Plaintiffs, in this case, allege a violation of their substantive due process rights. Substantive due process is the deprivation of a protected interest involving an abuse of official power which "shocks the conscience." United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Twp. of Warrington, 316 F.3d 392, 399 (3d Cir. 2003). Thus, Plaintiff must (1) allege and substantiate a property interest protected by due process, and (2) prove that the government's deprivation of that property interest shocks the conscience. Cherry Hill Towers, L.L.C. v. Twp of Cherry Hill, 407 F. Supp. 2d 648, 654 (D.N.J. 2006).
Plaintiffs assert that Defendants' actions, per section 1983, violated their constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment. (Sec. Am. Compl. ¶ 19.) As all of Plaintiffs' claim arise from the detectives' unlawful search and seizure of their home, this Court will examine their claims under the Fourth Amendment.
Using Saucier's two-step analysis, it is clear that Plaintiffs' had a constitutional right to be free from an unlawful search and seizure.*fn4 Such a right is clearly established. "The Fourth Amendment . . . provides in pertinent part that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . .." Soldal v. Cook County, Ill., 506 U.S. 56, 61 (1992) (citing Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 30 (1963)). Seizure of property occurs when "there is some meaningful interference with an individual's possessory interests in that property." Id. (citing United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113 (1984)). Further, the Supreme Court has been clear that "at the very core" of the Fourth Amendment "stands the right of a man to retreat into his own home." Id. (citing Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505, 511 (1961)).
The Courts have been clear: qualified immunity is appropriate for reasonable actions undertaken by police officer. See Saucier 121 U.S. at 205 (citing Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 388 (1989)) ("Because 'police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments-in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving-about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation,' the reasonableness of the officer's belief as to the appropriate level of force should be judged from that on-scene perspective.") A police officer's actions, even if erroneous, should be subject to qualified immunity if the actions were reasonable. See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982) ("government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.").
The Supreme Court in Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987), examined the parameters of what constituted reasonable behavior under the Fourth Amendment. In Maryland, the police, armed with a valid search warrant, lawfully conducted a search of a third floor apartment. Unbeknownst to the police, the third floor contained not one but two apartments. Id. at 86. Before discovering that the third floor contained two apartments -- one occupied by McWebb that was subject to search, and the other occupied by plaintiff Garrison -- the officers searched the former and found and seized illegal contraband. Id. at 81. Subsequently, upon discovering that there was a second apartment, the officers halted their search. Id. at 82. The Court held that the officers' actions did not violate Garrison's Fourth Amendment rights. Id. at 86. The officers had a valid warrant to search the apartment occupied by McWebb, McWebb granted the police entrance to the apartment, and the police discontinued the search once they recognized that there was a separate, third floor apartment not encompassed by the search warrant. Id. at 86-87. Finding that the officers did not violate Garrison's Fourth Amendment rights, the Court noted that "[w]hile the purposes justifying a police search strictly limit the permissible extent of the search, the Court has also recognized the need to allow some latitude for honest mistakes that are made by officers in the dangerous and difficult process of making arrests and executing search warrants." Id. at 87. Further, the Court noted that "the officers' conduct was consistent with the reasonable effort to ascertain and identify the place intended to be searched within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment." Id. at 88.
In Fullard v. City of Phila., Civ. A. No. 95-4949, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5321 (E.D. Pa., Apr. 22, 1996), the court examined whether police officers violated the Fourth Amendment rights of the occupants of a home when they entered the home based on inaccurate information contained on the arrest warrant. Police were attempting to arrest an individual alleged to have robbed a bar at gunpoint, and their records erroneously indicated that the robber lived at 754 North Uber Street. Id. at *4 Only after a police SWAT team raided 754 North Uber Street was it discovered that the police department's records were mistaken as the robber lived at 752 North Uber Street, and that an innocent family lived at 754 North Uber Street. Id. That family subsequently filed suit alleging that this erroneous search violated their Fourth Amendment rights. Id. The court disagreed noting that the officers who executed the warrant deserved qualified immunity as "these officers, possessing a valid arrest warrant and acting in reliance of an investigation conducted by their supervisors, reasonably believed that they were at the right address, they cannot be said to have violated rights of which a reasonable officer would have known." Id. at *30.
The Fullard court went on to note that the reasonableness determination turned upon a careful examination of objective facts. Specifically, the court stated that "there are many cases in which courts have denied claims of qualified immunity by police personnel being sued under § 1983." Id. at 20-21. But unlike in Fullard, those instance when qualified immunity was not granted involved officers aware of factual discrepancies that "would have placed reasonable officers on notice that they were searching the wrong premises." Id. at 20-21. The court examined a number of cases concluding that "officers who have conducted a wrongful search or seizure are entitled to qualified immunity unless they knew information which would have alerted a reasonable officer of the possibility of a fourth amendment violation." Id. at 27.
The Fullard court found that defendant officers' actions were analogous to those of the officers in Hartsfield v. Lemacks, 50 F.3d 950 (11th Cir. 1995). Id. In Hartsfield, police officers possessed a valid warrant to search 5108 Middlebrooks Drive, but mistakenly searched 5128 Middlebrooks Drive. Id. at 951. The search of 5128 Middlebrooks Drive lasted for ten to fifteen minutes before the officers looked at the search warrant and realized that they were at the wrong house. Id. at 951. The Hartsfield court declined to grant qualified immunity to the deputy who led the police officers on the home raid, noting that there were numerous, factual reasons why the deputy's actions were unreasonable: he had been to the correct home -- 5108 Middlebrooks -- the day prior; the homes looked different; each of the homes' street numbers were clearly marked; and they were located on different parts of the street. Id. The court noted that the deputy "did not check to make sure that he was leading the other officers to the correct address, let alone perform any precautionary measures such as those performed by the officers in Garrison." Id.
In the present case, it is clear that Officer Dailey's actions were unreasonable. The detective knew that on March 28, 2007, they were to seize two forfeited homes. After securing "2940-42 W. Clementine St.," the officers were to re-stage at "2600 W. Silver St." before sealing "2637 W. Silver St." (Defs.' Mot. Summ. J., Ex. A List of Home Sealings for the Week of March 26, 2007.) Instead, Officer Dailey proceeded down the 2600 block of West Silver Street, and upon noticing a home where one individual was leaving and another was entering he determined that this was the home to be sealed.*fn5 See (Id.; Dailey Dep. 111:21-12:13.) The home did not have its street number posted, but, based on the activity, Officer Dailey "thought that that was the property. I mistook the property for 2637."
The detectives in this case possessed a valid order to enter a home. But as in Hartsfield, Officer Bailey did not enter the correct home. The home to be sealed was a different home, on the opposite side of the street, with its street number clearly marked. Officer Dailey, noting that the 2636 West Silver Street was unnumbered, did not stop to check if he was on the "even" or "odd" side of the street much less at the right home. Instead, he unreasonably concluded that Plaintiffs' residence was the one to be sealed simply because people were exiting and entering it. People routinely exit and enter homes in the morning.*fn6 It is unreasonable to witness such activity, and conclude -- without any further verification -- that this is the home to be sealed. Yet, Officer Dailey did not stop there. Rather, he acted upon his mistaken belief and began to evict occupants from their home so it could be sealed. As Plaintiffs' counsel aptly notes "[i]f detectives had gone to the 2600 block of West Silver Street and selected a house at random to seal, there would be no question as to the unreasonableness of the detectives' conduct. But their selection of the plaintiffs' house in this case is indistinguishable from such random action." (Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J. 6.)
While the actions of Officer Dailey were unreasonable, this Court concludes that the decision of the other officers to enter 2636 West Silver Street was not unreasonable. Like the officers in Hartsfield, these officers were simply following the lead of one acting as if he was appropriately carrying out a valid legal action. It is not unreasonable for the other detectives to conclude that Officer Dailey had determined that he was entering the appropriate home. Sealing a home is a difficult process. Evicting residents can be a tense process fraught with conflict and potential for danger. That officers would quickly follow a colleague into a home to be sealed is unexceptional. Once efforts to seal a home are underway, it is unsurprising that the officers are focused on the task at hand -- sealing of the home -- and not looking to see if the home is correctly numbered. The time for determining whether they were entering the appropriate home was before entering it. Under this narrow set of circumstances, qualified immunity is appropriate on the issue of home entry and seizure for the remaining officers, some of whom did not arrive until the time it was determined that they were seizing the wrong home.
But the qualified immunity inquiry does not end there, as the outstanding issue remains as to whether or not the officers bolted Plaintiffs' home, barred re-entry, and then did not unlock the home so that Plaintiffs could return home. The detectives assert that 2636 West Silver Street was never padlocked because:
[a]s soon as the last person came out and she noticed that we were at the wrong place, everybody can go back in, so McConnell never got a chance to go to his car and get the drill because we were letting everybody back in. We had discovered that we were at the wrong property, so that property was never padlocked.
(Dailey Dep. 22:11-17.) The detective in charge agreed with Officer Dailey, stating that 2636 West Silver Street could not have been locked because:
[w]hen we do these -- Karen maintains -- Detective Hayward maintains the eye bolts and the locks again because she's at every property. If for some reason I have some other obligation, she's able to take care of that to secure the property. Another detective will take the drill to drill the holes or whatever, but I have to wait for her to show up to get the eye bolts and the lock. And I recall when this was brought up when she finally showed up, we were already across the street to the other property.
(McConnell Dep. 26:22-27:7.)
To the contrary, Allen asserts that the detectives padlocked his home placing "[t]wo on the front, one on the back." (Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J.; Allen Dep. 32:16.) Mr. Allen witnessed the detectives padlock his house stating that he "saw them. They had drills and stuff in their hands, screws." (Id. at 32:19-20.) Allen stated that the detectives did not remove the padlocks, and he was not able to re-enter his home before 1:30 in the afternoon. (Id. at 33:3-5.) Allen states that he spent a considerable amount of time trying to "get my doors and stuff back in order," cutting off the padlocks with a hammer and hacksaw. (Id. at 37:8-38:14.) He further claims that the front, back, and cellar door were damaged. (Id. at 38:18-39:20.)
This creates a genuine issue as to material facts. For summary judgment purposes, viewing the evidence in favor of the non-moving party, the alleged improper sealing and failure to re-open Plaintiffs' home amounts to an unlawful violation of their Fourth Amendment rights. Accordingly, summary judgment dismissal of the Fourth Amendment claims against the individual detectives is unwarranted.
Plaintiffs also assert a state-law claim stating that Defendants' actions "constitute unlawful seizure and taking of property under the laws and Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania." (Sec. Am. Compl. ¶ 22.) Plaintiffs' own Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment questions the viability of this claim. Specifically, Plaintiffs stated that:
there is no question that the Defendants' conduct violated the laws and Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and that their actions were grossly negligent. However, the plaintiffs' concede that the defendants' actions do not come within one of the exceptions of the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §8542 and it is doubtful that they rise to the level of willful misconduct required by Section 8550 of the Act.
(Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J. 10.)
Section 8452 protects municipalities from state-law liability, and Section 8545 extends the scope of the Act to protect governmental employees. Bright v. Westmoreland County, 443 F.3d 276 (3d Cir. 2006) (applying Pennsylvania Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act to law enforcement officials as their conduct was not deemed "willful misconduct.") Section 8550 permits actions against governmental employees who by their misdeeds are determined to have "caused the injury and that such act constituted a crime, actual fraud, actual malice or willful misconduct, the provisions of sections 8545 (relating to official liability generally), 8546 (relating to defense of official immunity), 8548 (relating to indemnity) and 8549 (relating to limitation on damages) shall not apply." 42 Pa. CONS. STAT. § 8550. Plaintiffs notes that it is unlikely that Defendants' actions constitute "willful misconduct." By implication, they acknowledge that Defendants' actions do not constitute a crime, were not fraudulent, and did not involve actual malice.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has defined willful misconduct as "conduct whereby the actor desired to bring about the result that followed or at least was aware that it was substantially certain to follow, so that such desire can be implied." Vega v. Columbia Borough, Civ. A. No. 08-05932, 2009 WL 2143549, at *5 (E.D. Pa. July 15, 2009) (citing Sanford v. Stiles, 456 F.3d 298, 315 (3d Cir. 2006)). "Otherwise stated, the term willful misconduct is synonymous with the term intentional tort." Id. Under Pennsylvania law, "willful misconduct" for which an employee of local agency is not immune, is misconduct which the perpetrator recognized was misconduct but still carried it out with intention of achieving exactly that wrongful purpose. In re City of Phila. Litig., 938 F. Supp. 1264 (E.D. Pa. 1996).
There is no indication that Defendants' actions were anything other than a mistake. Even if the mistake was unreasonable, there is no evidence suggesting that their actions amounted to willful misconduct. Accordingly, summary dismissal of Plaintiffs' state-law claim is granted.
On June 15, 2009, the parties stipulated that both the City of Philadelphia and former Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson should be terminated from the suit parties stipulated that the City be dismissed as a Defendant "based on the assertion of the defendants that the District Attorney's Office of Philadelphia, as the employer of the named defendant detectives was the proper party to defend this action." (Pls.' Resp. Mot. Summ. J. 4; Docket No. 21.) In their Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants currently seek dismissal of the District Attorney's Office, as it is not a proper party as "all suits against any department of the City must be brought in the name of the City itself because the departments of the City do not have an independent corporate existence."
Plaintiffs' counsel objects, however, claiming that it is "disingenuous" to assert that the action cannot now be brought against the District Attorney's Office. (Id.) As a result, Plaintiffs seek permission to bring this suit against the District Attorney's Office or to have the City of Philadelphia reinstated as a party.
The first option is not possible as it is clear that the District Attorney's Office "is not an entity for purposes of § 1983 liability," and it should be dismissed. Reitz v. County of Bucks, 125 F.3d 139, 148 (3d Cir. 1997). As to the second option, the City of Philadelphia as any municipality, may only be held liable under § 1983 when the "execution of a government's policy or custom . . . inflicts the injury." Andrews v. City of Phila., 895 F.2d 1469, 1480 (3d Cir. 1990). While a government policy is established by a "decision maker possessing final authority," a custom arises from a "course of conduct . . . so permanent and well settled as to virtually constitute law." Andrews, 895 F.2d at 1480 (citing Monell v. Dept. of Soc. Srvs. of the City of N. Y., 436 U.S. 658 (1978)). Plaintiffs seeking to recover from a municipality must: (1) identify an allegedly unconstitutional policy or custom; (2) demonstrate that the municipality, through its deliberate and culpable conduct, was the "moving force" behind the injury alleged; and (3) demonstrate a direct causal link between the municipal action and the alleged deprivation of federal rights. Bd. of the County Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).
Plaintiffs have provided no evidence that any custom, policy, pattern, or practice of the City's District Attorney's Office contributed to any of the injuries alleged by Plaintiffs. Accordingly, were this Court to reinstate the City of Philadelphia as a Defendant, it would do so only to have to dismiss the City subsequently because Plaintiffs have made no showing of municipal liability that could survive summary dismissal. Accordingly, the District Attorney's Office of the City of Philadelphia is dismissed.
For the reasons discussed above, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Ambronac Tablet contains following Salts:-
Ambroxol - Drug Information
Typical usage: :Potent mucolytic and mucokinetic agent, capable of bringing out bronchial secreation especially mucous plugs. Chronic obstructive lung disease, bronchiectesis.
Probable Side Effects: :Hypersensitivity reactions, contact allergy.
Drug Interaction: Ambroxol is known to interact with other drugs like codeine. Always consult your physician for the change of dose regimen or an alternative drug of choice that may strictly be required.
Mechanism of Action: Ambroxol is a secretolytic agent used in the treatment of respiratory diseases associated with viscid or excessive mucus. It stimulates synthesis and release of surfactant by type IIpneumocytes. Surfactants acts as an anti-glue factor by reducing the adhesion of mucus to the bronchial wall, in improving its transport and in providing protection against infection and irritating agents.
Pregnancy Impact: Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans, but potential benefits may warrant use of the drug in pregnant women despite potential risks.
Impact During Lactation: There are no controlled studies in breastfeeding women, however the risk of untoward effects to a breastfed infant is possible; or, controlled studies show only minimal non-threatening adverse effects. Drugs should be given only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the infant.
N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine - Drug Information
Typical usage: :For the prevention of liver damage and kidney damage associated with overdoses of acetaminophen.
Probable Side Effects: :Warm sensation, erythema, phlebitis, thrombosis, flushing, fever, nausea.
Drug Interaction: Tell your doctor of all prescription and nonprescription medication you may use. Do not start or stop any medicine without doctor or pharmacist approval.
Mechanism of Action: Cysteine can usually be synthesized by the human body under normal physiological conditions if a sufficient quantity of methionine is available. Due to the ability of thiols to undergo redox reactions, cysteine has antioxidant properties. Cysteine's antioxidant properties are typically expressed in the tripeptide glutathione, which occurs in humans as well as other organisms. The systemic availability of oral glutathione (GSH) is negligible; so it must be biosynthesized from its constituent amino acids, cysteine, glycine, and glutamic acid. Glutamic acid and glycine are readily available in the diets of most industrialized countries, but the availability of cysteine can be the limiting substrate. Cysteine is also an important source of sulfide in human metabolism. The sulfide in iron-sulfur clusters and in nitrogenase is extracted from cysteine, which is converted to alanine in the process.
Pregnancy Impact: No Studies Available
Impact During Lactation: No Studies Available
Price of Ambronac Tablet : Rs.76.00
|Dispatches by
|Same Day
|Ambroxol 30 mg, N-Acetylcysteine 200 mg
|Salt Information
|Ambroxol, N-Acetylcysteine
|Therapeutic Class
|Brand Name
|Tablets India
|Pack Size
|10 Tablet
Use spaces to separate tags. Use single quotes (') for phrases.
FAQ on Ambronac Tablet
There are no product questions yet.
We guarantee to ship your order next day after order has been submitted
Customer Service
Please contacts us and our customer service team will answer all your questions
Easy Returns
If you are not satisfied with your order - send it back within 14 days after day of purchase!
Substitutes of Ambronac Tablet
Rs.1.00Novartis India
Rs.1.00Indoco Pharma
Rs.1.00Lupin Labs
Chloroquin Phosphate 250mg 10TabletRs.1.00Tosc International
Rs.1.00Lark Laboratories
Rs.1.00Cyper Drugs & Pharma
Rs.1.00Shalina Laboratories
Rs.1.00Orchid Chemicals & Pharma
Rs.1.00Low Cost Standard Therapeutics (Locost)
Rs.1.00Taj Pharma
- Mail Today
- Bio Spectrum
- The Financial Chronicle
- Business Standard
- News Informer
- Pharmabiz
- Business Standard
- News Prelease
- Biznews Index
- Shafaqna
- Newsgrey
- 15 Minute News
- Biz Radar
- VNI India
- Khari News
- Hunt News
- Dharmpath
- Express Pharma
- Silicon India
- The Hindu
- Your Story
- Stratos Invest
- EPL India
- Tropical
- Tenuz
- Hindustan Times
- The Times of India


text:
Slimline Pen Hardware Kit - Satin Nickel
Home > Rockler > Wood Turning > Pen Turning Kits
|A classic twist pen, the Slimline is an all-time favorite. Its simple design is accessible to beginners, yet attractive enough to satisfy more experienced turners. Quality components like the Swiss-made carbide writing tip make the Slimline Pen a fantastic writing choice.Turning Accessories Needed:
Only $2.99 at Rockler.com


text:
This email was created by [your name] who thought you would be interested in the following Article:
"Fun With Templates: Part 1" Explores some of the lesser known features of C++ templates.
CodeProject also contains hundreds of articles, free source code samples and applications to help in your day to day programming. Why not give it a try!


text:
Jilmar's Hawaiian Pineapple Stuffing
Total Time
Prep 6 mins
Cook 45 mins
This is truly tasty. This reminds me of Hawaii with the pineapple.
Ingredients Nutrition
- 1⁄2 cup butter or 1⁄2 cup margarine
- 4 eggs
- 1 cup sugar
- 1 (20 ounce) candrained crushed pineapple
- 7 slices bread, cubed
- Cream the butter and sugar and beat in the eggs and pineapple.
- Fold in the bread cubes.
- Grease a 1 1/2 quart casserole.
- Bake, uncovered for 45 minutes in a 350* oven.
- Good with baked ham.
Most Helpful
Delicious! This is the 3rd pineapple stuffing that I've tried and it is by far our family's favorite. It has a good balance with the sweetness so it doesn't get overpowering. It's now a holiday favorite.


text:
Grandma's Macaroni and Cheese
Total Time
Prep 25 mins
Cook 30 mins
This mac and cheese was made by my Grandma, mother, me and my children. It was my favorite growing up and now my youngest daughter's. Recently she (13 years old) asked if we were having mac n cheese for dinner. I asked why. She said because the white casserole dish was out. She then went on to request that she get the casserole dish when I die - not because of its value - because of her fondness for her Grandma's Mac n cheese. Sounds a little boring, but not. My husband likes to top his with a little Tabasco. My mother insisted on using Creamettes brand of macaroni.
Ingredients Nutrition
- 1 lb elbow macaroni
- 1 (46 ounce) can tomato juice
- 1 lb sharp longhorn cheese, grated
- salt
- pepper
- Preheat oven to 350 degrees.
- Cook the pasta al dente to package directions. Drain.
- In a 3-quart casserole dish layer macaroni, juice, salt, pepper, and cheese. Be sure to get the edges and corners with the juice.
- Repeat layers until casserole is full, ending with cheese.
- Bake at 350 degrees until cheese is melted through and top begins to brown.
Most Helpful
This was a fabulous recipe, just tried it tonight. I have used mac and cheese with tomato juice and it was great, but this was even better. Not a bit boring on taste, just qucik and easy to make!
Should be 3 and 1/2 stars. This was yummy comfort food and as simple as it gets. I halved it and I think you could use less juice. Undercook the mac a little so it doesn't get mushy.


text:
Slim, space-saving chassis. Affordable. Minimal bloatware. Integrated Wi-Fi.
No USB 3.0. Older "Sandy Bridge" processor.
The Lenovo H520s desktop PC combines decent performance and value into a compact chassis, though there are similarly priced alternatives with more forward-looking hardware available.
More »
The HP Pavilion M6-1148CA sports a sleek design and a decent feature set at a reasonable price tag.
More »
With its class-leading performance and admirable feature set, the Lenovo G580 is an excellent value ...
More »
The Asus VivoBook S56CA-DH31-CA ultrabook boasts an integrated DVD burner, reasonable price tag, and...
More »


text:
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Well, I figured that I would start a blog just in case there was someone who just happened to stumble across my humble abode and like what they saw. So, I've been a fan of the AC series since the very beginning. I've purchased all of the platform games and played most of the hand-held versions. I'm pretty fluent in my conversations about ideas and possible "conspiracies" about the story and it's lore. I'm going to try and make a weekly blog about the current events and interesting segments as they arise. So, until next time, Everything is true, nothing is permitted.Read more >


text:
It's freezing here so I'm always bundled up. And planes are always cold. But what should I wear if I'm flying somewhere warm? Can I change when I get there? What do I do with my big winter coat?
What to wear to the airport when I'm flying to the Caribbean?
What Guys Said 1
Don't take a coat. I suppose it depends on how you're getting from your house to the airport. If it's in a car, you can stand to be without a coat for a few moments. Even if it's on public transport, getting to the airport should be doable with just long sleeves and pants. You won't need to be in a hurry when you arrive; you can just take off what you wore on the way and save it for the trip back. :)
Enjoy your vacation.00|00|0
What Girls Said 0
No girls shared opinions.
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
Select as Most Helpful Opinion?
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.


text:
At Dillard's, we implemented a security program to ensure that a human is trying to enter our site and not a computer. If you have any questions, please contact firstname.lastname@example.com.
If you want to pay your bill, please visit Dillards.com/payonline.
Item #04722439
Write a Review
Eggshell Sable
Click Image To Zoom


text:
01-23-2013 09:18 PM - edited 01-23-2013 10:53 PM
Yes utilization is across all cards. Keep your utilization below 10% across all cards. Do not apply for anymore cards because we call your limits toy limits and you will only get more like this if you dont garden so go ahead on over to the garden and let your current cards grow
You can try see if you CCC will increase your limits with soft pulls. I read this thread before: Check to see if a card pull Hard or Soft when requesting a CLI.
Thank you Chnceit.
I plan on doing just that. Will work with the CC i have and grow them. I already started getting credit increase offers....
Thank you Ceemee2203.
I will check with my CCC before accepting an CCI..
Forums posts are not provided or commissioned by FICO. Forums posts have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by FICO. It is not FICO's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.
Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more
FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.