text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
March 11, 2009
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,v.KEVIN FITZGERALD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Now before the Court are two motions made by Defendant NBT Bank concerning the appropriate scope of discovery in this case. First, is Defendant's "Motion to Compel Discovery, Motion for Sanctions, Motion for Attorney Fees" (Doc. 72) filed on January 13, 2009. Second, is Defendant's "Motion for Allowance to Serve Supplemental Discovery Requests Upon Plaintiff" (Doc. 77) filed on January 22, 2009. For the reasons detailed in this memorandum, both motions will be denied.
The Court has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
On or about January 11, 2006, property owned by Kevin and Jacqueline Fitzgerald ("the Fitzgeralds") sustained fire damage. (Am. Compl., Doc. 48 ¶ 12.) In accordance with the terms and conditions of a mortgage they had entered with Plaintiff Option One Mortgage Corporation ("Option One"), the Fitzgeralds had a hazard insurance policy for damage to the property. (Id. ¶ 10.) As a result of the fire damage to the property, on May 23, 2006, the Fitzgeralds' insurer, Nationwide Insurance, issued a loss draft check in the amount of one hundred thirteen thousand, six hundred thirteen dollars ($113,613.00). (Id. ¶ 13.) This check was made payable to "Kevin Fitzgerald and Jacqueline Fitzgerald and Option One Mrtg. Corp." (Id.; Check, Doc. 1, Ex. 2.) This check was endorsed by the Fitzgeralds, and on or about June 28, 2006, Defendants NBT Bank, N.A. ("NBT") and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JP Morgan") both honored the check, even though it had not been endorsed by Option One. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 17-22.)
On October 16, 2007, Option One filed its Complaint (Doc. 1) with this Court alleging four (4) counts of conversion and fraud against the Fitzgeralds, NBT, and JP Morgan. On November 3, 2008, this Court granted Option One's motion to amend the original Complaint. (Doc. 47.) The Amended Complaint (Doc. 48) included an additional, fifth count against the Fitzgeralds for breach of contract. In November of 2008, Defendants NBT Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed Answers to Option One's Amended Complaint that included numerous cross claims against all Defendants. (Docs. 54, 55.) On December 10, 2008, NBT Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. mutually withdrew the cross claims brought against each other without withdrawing the cross claims brought against the Fitzgeralds. (Doc. 57.)
On January 13, 2009, NBT filed the present "Motion to Compel Discovery. Motion For Sanctions, Motion for Attorney Fees." (Doc. 72.) Therein, NBT states that, in 2007, NBT served Option One with a document request and set of interrogatories, and that Option One's responses to these discovery requests "consist largely of blanket objections" and "do not provide the requested information or documents." (Id. ¶¶ 1-3.) NBT, thus, requests that this Court order Option One to provide all of the supplemental document productions and interrogatory replies identified in the motion, and requests that the Court impose sanction against Option One for all of NBT's costs and fees associated with the preparation and filing of the present motion. (Id. ¶ 48.) On January 22, 2009, NBT filed the second present "Motion for Allowance to Serve Supplemental Discovery Requests Upon Plaintiff." (Doc. 77.) In this motion, NBT reiterates those arguments pertaining to Option One's responses to NBT's discovery requests originally made in its January 13, 2009 motion, argue that discovery has raised new issues, and that statements made by the Fitzgeralds during depositions "cast this case in a whole new light, and raise questions concerning: whether the Plaintiff knew of and consented to the use of the insurance funds by Mr. Fitzgerald; whether Plaintiff ever objected to Mr. Fitzgerald's use of the insurance check proceeds; and, whether Plaintiff was negligent in its monitoring and/or involvement with the insurance repairs." (Id. ¶¶ 6-9.) As a result, NBT requests that this Court enter an order allowing NBT to serve supplemental discovery requests upon Option One. (Id. ¶ 15.)
NBT filed its brief in support of its motion to compel discovery on January 22, 2009 (Doc. 79), Option One filed its brief in opposition on January 23, 2009 (Doc. 80), and NBT filed a reply brief on February 4, 2009 (Doc 92). Likewise, NBT filed a brief in support of its motion to serve supplemental discovery requests on February 4, 2009 (Doc. 93) and Option One filed a statement of facts (Doc. 95) and opposition brief (Doc. 96) on February 10, 2009. On February 20, 2009, the Court heard oral argument concerning both motions from counsel for NBT and Option One. (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, Doc. 100.) As these motions have been thoroughly briefed and argued, they are currently ripe for disposition.
Rule 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. For good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action. Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence...
It is critical to note that the discovery shall be "relevant to the claim or defense of any party" or that "for good cause" the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action." As to the latter, relevancy is broader than the former. In the latter, "relevant information" need not be admissible or relevant to the "claim or defense" if the discovery "appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." In the former, it must be relevant to the claim or defense. This structure of Rule 26(b)(1) is the result of amendment in 2000. Instead of all discoverybeing relevant to the subject matter of the action, i.e. reasonably calculated to the discovery of admissible evidence, it must now be relevant, and therefore admissible at trial or if good cause is shown, the court may order discovery if it is relevant to the "subject matter" of the action, i.e. reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, a party who has received evasive or incomplete discovery responses may seek a court order compelling additional disclosure or discovery. "The party seeking the order to compel must demonstrate the relevance of the information sought. The burden then shifts to the opposing party, who must demonstrate in specific terms why a discovery request does not fall within the broad scope of discovery or is otherwise privileged or improper." Paluch v. Dawson, No. 1:CV-06-1751, 2007 WL 4375937, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2007).
I. NBT's Motion to Compel Discovery
In its motion to compel, Defendant NBT offers several arguments why the Court should require Option One to further respond to NBT's discovery requests. First, NBT makes a generalized complaint that Option One's answers to various interrogatories have primarily consisted of blanket objections. NBT further argues that Option One's provision of documents was limited to "Plaintiff's extremely narrow interpretation of the issues relevant to this case" and has "wholly disregarded NBT's pleaded Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims." (Def.'s Br. in Reply, Doc. 92, at 5.) In response, Option One argues that the current case "involves the cashing (conversion) of a check and that "[t]he information that the Defendant is seeking is not relevant to the instant action, but only sought in bad faith to annoy, embarrass, or cause undue burden on Plaintiff." (Pl.'s Br. in Opp., Doc. 80, Ex. 1 at 10.)
On February 20, 2009, counsel for both NBT and Option One appeared before the Court for oral argument on NBT's motion to compel. During the course of this argument, counsel for NBT represented that the interrogatories submitted to Option One that are the subject of the present motion to compel were drafted by NBT's prior counsel. (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, at 14:23-15:19.) The Court questioned NBT's counsel concerning these interrogatories and, after acknowledging that some of these original interrogatories were not on-point and relevant to the current case, counsel agreed that answers to these interrogatories was unnecessary in the event that Option One, provided responses to the supplemental interrogatories submitted by NBT. (Id. at 16:11-21.) At the conclusion of arguments, the Court asked, and NBT's counsel confirmed, that responses to the supplemental interrogatories and document requests would obviate the need for further response from Option One concerning the original interrogatories and document requests. (Id. at 42:3-6.)
In summary, counsel for NBT has represented that the original document requests and interrogatories were, in several cases, not "on-point" and superceded by the supplemental interrogatories and document requests drafted as the discovery process progressed. Moreover, after a review of both the original and supplemental requests made by NBT, the Court believes that the original requests are largely represented and included in the supplemental requests. Since the original discovery requests sought information that NBT admits is not relevant, and since the supplemental requests are largely inclusive of the information sought in NBT's original requests, the Court will deny NBT's Motion to Compel Discovery from Plaintiff Option One.
II. NBT's Motion For Sanctions and Attorney Fees
In addition to its Motion to Compel Discovery, NBT asks the Court to impose sanctions on Option One in the full amount of NBT's legal fees and costs required to draft, file, argue and prosecute the motion to compel discovery. Since the Court will deny NBT's Motion to Compel Discovery, NBT is not entitled to this relief and the Court will also deny NBT's motion for sanctions and attorney's fees.
III. NBT's Motion For Allowance to Serve Supplemental Discovery Requests and Supplemental Interrogatories
In the brief supporting its motion to serve supplemental discovery, NBT first argues that it should be entitled to "probe what would have happened differently if [Option One had] signed the Check, and how [Option One] has been damaged by the use of the Check's proceeds for their intended purpose of repairing the Fitzgerald's [sic] house." (Def.'s Br. in Supp., Doc. 93, at 3.) NBT argues that this additional discovery is warranted due to new facts arising out of the depositions of Thomas Senor, a Supervisor for Nationwide Insurance, and Kevin Fitzgerald. The notable facts, as identified and stated by NBT are that
(1) Option One was listed as a payee on the insurance check solely because of Option One's mortgage interest, (2) the check was never intended for payment to Option One outright and the inclusion of Option One as a signatory was to allow them to monitor or participate in the repairs to the Fitzgeralds' house, (3) Kevin Fitzgerald was told by a representative of Nationwide Insurance to deposit the check and hire a contractor, and (4) Mr. Fitzgerald deposited the check and then contracted with "Eagle Crest Homes," paying them thirty-two thousand dollars ($32,000.00) as a down payment for reconstruction of his home. NBT also argues that Mr. Fitzgerald testified that Option One made no inquires into Mr. Fitzgerald's efforts to secure a contractor and did not communicate any objection or concerns to Mr. Fitzgerald concerning his use of the insurance proceeds. (Id. at 2-3.)*fn1
NBT's second argument in favor of the proposed discovery states that, in July 2007, roughly three months prior to filing the current action, Option One assigned its interest in the Fitzgeralds' property to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"). On the basis of this assignment, NBT argues that they are entitled to probe how Option One has any standing to assert rights to the insurance proceeds at issue in this case.
NBT's third argument is that Option One has not properly registered to do business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. According to NBT Pennsylvania statute prevents a corporation that has failed to register in Pennsylvania from prosecuting any litigation in Pennsylvania's courts. See 15 Pa. C.S.A. § 4141(a).
Finally, in its fourth argument, NBT argues that, because Option One brought suit pursuant to the Pennsylvania Uniform Commercial Code, 13 Pa. C.S.A. § 1101, et seq. ("UCC"), the appropriate measure of damages in this case is not the face value of the check, but the amount that Option One could have received and retained from the check if it had not been erroneously honored. (Def.'s Br. in Supp., Doc. 93, at 4.) This argument is based on NBT's characterization that Option One's Complaint makes no allegations of bad faith, but simply a failure to exercise ordinary care when Mr. Fitzgerald presented and NBT deposited the improperly endorsed check. NBT, thus, states that the appropriate measure of damages is dictated by 13 Pa. C.S.A. § 4103(e) which specifies:
(e) MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR FAILURE TO EXERCISE ORDINARY CARE.-- The measure of damages for failure to exercise ordinary care in handling an item is the amount of the item reduced by an amount that could not have been realized by the exercise of ordinary care. If there is also bad faith it includes any other damages the party suffered as a proximate consequence.
In short, NBT argues that "[Option One's] damages (if any) are expressly limited to what Plaintiff could have recovered if it had been given an opportunity to endorse the Check." (Id.) In further support of this argument, NBT cites to two cases, Weiler v. Marine National Bank, 285 Pa. 23 (Pa. 1925), and NBT Bank, N.A. v. First National Community Bank, 287 F. Supp.2d 564 (M.D.Pa. 2003) (Vanaski, J.), two cases supporting the general measure fo damages principle stated in 13 Pa. C.S.A. § 4103(e). Based on the alleged support provided by these cases and statutes, NBT states that it is entitled to probe: "(a) [sic] why and how Plaintiff has preserved standing to assert rights in the Check, despite the Assignment to Wells Fargo; (2) whether Mr. Fitzgerald's initial use of the Check's proceeds comported with Plaintiff's normal procedure for insurance repairs to mortgaged property, and/or whether NBT's erroneous honoring of the Check had any actual effect on how the proceeds were used by Mr. Fitzgerald; (3) what Plaintiff's actual out-of-pocket loss was (if any) that was caused directly by NBT's erroneous honoring of the Check; and (4) whether the underlying loan balance has been paid in full and thus prevents Plaintiff from further recovery... through its action on the Check, due to assignee Wells Fargo's failure to timely file a petition for fair market value despite Wells Fargo's foreclosure on the Fitzgerald's Property...." (Def.'s Br. in Supp., Doc. 93, at 6.)
In its opposition brief, Option One, once again, responds to NBT's arguments as a whole by stating that "this action involves the cashing (conversion) of a check" and that the information NBT seeks through the supplemental discovery "is not relevant to the instant action, but only sought in bad faith to annoy, embarrass, or cause undue burden on Plaintiff." (Pl.'s Br. in Opp., Doc. 96 at 3.) Option One, further represents that it has "fully responded to Defendant's discovery request," and has "turned over all documents to Defendant's counsel related to this action." (Pl.'s Br. in Opp., Doc. 80, Ex. 1, at 3, 6.) This same representation was made during the oral argument held before the Court on February 20, 2009. Accordingly, Option One requests that the Court deny NBT's motions and enter a protective order to terminate or limit the scope of NBT's discovery to the cashing of the check. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) (identifying when discovery-related protective orders are appropriate).
A. Document Requests and Interrogatories Relating to NBT's First Argument
In order to identify the individual document requests and interrogatories corresponding to the various arguments presented, the Court has extensively reviewed NBT's supplemental document requests and interrogatories. Based on its review, the Court believes that supplemental document requests one, three, five, and six (See Supp. Doc. Req., Doc. 77, Ex. 2, at 5-6) and supplemental interrogatories seven through eighteen, twenty-two through twenty-seven, and thirty through thirty-one (See Supp. Interrogatories, Doc. 77, Ex. 3, at 11-22) are implicated by NBT's first line of argument.
In supplemental document request number one, NBT asks Option One to produce any and all training manuals that establish or set forth Option One's policies and/or procedures for collection, handling or administration of non-commercial mortgage accounts, and makes specific mention of "all section(s) detailing the steps and procedures Option One employees are to take in the event of damage to a property that is covered by insurance against which Option One holds a mortgage interest." (Supp. Doc. Req. at 5.) At the February 20, 2009 oral argument, NBT's counsel argued that this information was relevant to NBT's defense that Option One was aware of the fire and the insurance payment but negligently failed to oversee Mr. Fitzgerald's use of the money or otherwise take action for eighteen (18) months. (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, at 26:3-7.) In other words "if what was done with the money was what would usually have been done with the money even if [Option One] signed [the check], then that should certainly reduce the value of [Option One's] damages." (Id. at 24:18-21.) In response, counsel for Option One labeled this request as a "fishing expedition" unrelated to the claim or defense. (Id. at 26:20-21.)
On the basis of the arguments and evidence presented in support and opposition of NBT's supplemental request, the Court finds that NBT has not provided good cause showing that the requested training or policy manuals are relevant to either the claim or defenses in this case. NBT admits that it cashed the insurance check without proper endorsement from Option One, but suggests that the requested manuals will potentially show that Option One was somehow negligent in its oversight of Mr. Fitzgerald or that standard operating procedure would have provided Mr. Fitzgerald with complete discretion over the funds even if NBT had not improperly cashed the insurance check. However, the Court has received evidence, much of which was provided by NBT in support of its current motions, clearly indicating that Mr. Fitzgerald and Option One were not in contact at the time he received the check or during the period when Mr. Fitzgerald disposed of the insurance funds. As Option One's counsel stated at oral argument, "[Mr. Fitzgerald] stated he was never in contact with Option One. That was quite clear. One reason is Option One didn't know where he was. Even he admitted he didn't know where he was." (Id. at 18:3-6.)
Thus, the evidence thus far presented has not established that Option One either knew or should have known that: (1) Mr. Fitzgerald had received a check, (2) that NBT had cashed that check even though it was not properly endorsed, and that (3) Mr. Fitzgerald was spending the insurance proceeds on a contractor that "sounded too good to be true," to support his struggling small business, or to purchase a "monster truck." See supra note 1 and accompanying text. Thus, NBT's arguments rely solely on the speculation that Option One either did not attempt to locate Mr. Fitzgerald, or that if Option One had located Mr. Fitzgerald, their business practices and policies would have allowed him unfettered discretion to freely spend funds specifically designated to repair property that secured a note held by Option One. The Court finds such speculation too tenuous to support a finding of relevance, and will deny NBT's motion with respect to supplemental document request number one.
Supplemental document request number three seeks production of documents involving demand letters sent to any guarantors that involved the insurance check. (Supp. Doc. Req., at 5.) This request was specifically discussed in oral argument on February 20, 2009, at which time counsel for Option One represented to the Court that Option One had produced the entire loan file and that there were no guarantors. (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, at 28:11-31:12.) Based on this representation, the Court took notice that it was an established fact that there were no guarantors. (Id. at 31:13-14.) Thus, the Court will deny NBT's motion with respect to supplemental document request number three.
Supplemental document request number five requests all default or demand letters sent to Kevin Fitzgerald involving the note, the mortgage or the insurance check. (Supp. Doc. Req., at 5.) This request was specifically addressed at the oral argument held on February 20, 2009. At that time, Option One's counsel stated "I don't have them. I wouldn't have them. The foreclosure firm in New Jersey would have them, and [NBT's counsel] is welcome to subpoena them from them." (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, at 34:8-10.) Based on this representation by counsel that Option One is not in possession of any documents sought in this request, the Court will deny NBT's motion with respect to supplemental document request number five.
Supplemental document request number six asks for all written communication between Option One, Nationwide Insurance Company, and Kevin Fitzgerald relating to Mr. Fitzgerald's use of some of the proceeds generated by the insurance check to hire a contractor. (Supp. Doc. Req., at 5-6.) As already discussed in great detail, the evidence presented to the Court indicates that Mr. Fitzgerald and Option One were not in contact during the time that Mr. Fitzgerald received and spent the improperly cashed check. Further, counsel for Option One stated in oral argument that "[Option One] turned over the comment history, the payment history, the loan documents, all information on the insurance checks. We turned over every piece of paper the we had except for the manuals of course." (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, at 29:7-10.) Since the evidence provided, along with the representation by Option One's counsel, imparts that the requested documents either do not exist or are already in the possession of NBT's counsel, the Court will deny NBT's motion with respect to supplemental document request number six.
Supplemental interrogatories seven through eighteen, twenty-two through twenty-seven, thirty, and thirty-one further seek information concerning (1) what would have happened differently if Option One had endorsed the check, and (2) how Option One has been damaged by Mr. Fitzgerald's use of the funds after NBT cashed the check without obtaining the proper endorsement. These interrogatories seek information concerning (1) the names and contact information of Option One employees responsible for handling the Fitzgerald account or communications about the insurance claim, (2) Option One's efforts to monitor Kevin Fitzgerald and any efforts to repair the property at issue, (3) when and how Option One learned that Mr. Fitzgerald had received the check and allegedly hired a contractor, (4) any communications between Option One and Kevin Fitzgerald or Nationwide Insurance, (5) what Option One believes would have happened to the insurance funds had NBT properly obtained Option One's endorsement, and (6) what demands Option One has made upon any potential guarantors in this case. Thus, these interrogatories seek precisely the same information sought by NBT in supplemental document requests one, three, five, and six and, for the reasons set forth in greater detail, supra, the Court will deny NBT's motion with respect to each of these requests.
B. Document Requests and Interrogatories Relating to NBT's Second Argument
Having reviewed the supplemental requests made by NBT, the Court believes that supplemental document request seven and supplemental interrogatories four, five and nineteen through twenty-one are implicated by its argument that NBT should be allowed to probe whether Option One has standing to pursue the current action.
"[A]t an irreducible minimum, [Article III of the United States Constitution] requires the party who invokes the court's authority to show that he personally has suffered some actual or threatened injury as a result of the putatively illegal conduct of the defendant, and that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action and is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision." Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United For Separation of Church and State, 454 U.S. 464, 472 (1982) (citations omitted). "The requirement that a party seeking review must allege facts showing that he is himself adversely affected... does serve as at least a rough attempt to put the decision as to whether review will be sought in the hands of those who have a direct stake in the outcome." Id. (quoting Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 740 (1972).
NBT argues that it "is entitled to probe how [Option One] has any standing to assert rights in the Check despite Plaintiff unconditionally assigning away all such right as part and parcel of the Assignment to Wells Fargo." (Br. in Supp., at 3-4.) In the Court's view, questions concerning this assignment are not germane to the present action. Even if the Court assumes that, under the assignment, Option One will be required to turn any damages collected in this action over to Wells Fargo, the assignment does not alter the fact that Option One was a payee on a check that NBT improperly cashed without Option One's endorsement. Moreover, even if Wells Fargo were the assignee of the mortgage, it could not maintain an action against NBT on the check where Option One, and not Wells Fargo, was the payee. Thus, neither the fact that Option One assigned the underlying mortgage to Wells Fargo sometime after NBT cashed the check without endorsement, nor the possibility that Option One will pay Wells Fargo any damages it recovers, suggest that Option One was not harmed by NBT's failure require proper endorsement.
The Court also notes that, in the February 20, 2009 oral argument, NBT suggested that documents relating to the assignment are relevant in the current action because there is a possibility that the outstanding balance on Option One's loan to the Fitzgeralds was satisfied when Option One received consideration from Wells Fargo in exchange for the assignment. Thus, NBT suggests that, if Option One were awarded damages in the current case, Option One would be getting double recovery for the loss suffered when NBT improperly cashed the check. (Feb. 20, 2009 Transcript, at 40:13-20.) The Court asked if the assignment documents were contained in the loan file, and thus, produced from Option One to NBT (Id. at 39:8-9), and counsel for Option One represented to the Court that these documents had been produced (Id. at 39:10).
Accordingly, since the Court does not find that the assignment raises any germane issue with respect to Option One's standing to pursue its claims against NBT, and since Option One's counsel has represented that the assignment records were included in the loan file already in NBT's possession, Plaintiff's motion to serve supplemental document request number seven and interrogatories four, five, nineteen, twenty, and twenty-one will be denied.
C. Document Requests and Interrogatories Relating to NBT's Third Argument
Having reviewed the supplemental requests made by NBT, the Court believes that supplemental document requests two and four and supplemental interrogatories twenty-eight and twenty-nine are implicated by its argument that Option One is not properly registered to do business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and prevented by statute from prosecuting any litigation in Pennsylvania's courts.
When this issue was raised at oral argument, the Court allowed NBT's counsel five days to provide the Court with case law stating that Option One cannot cure this defect by completing the appropriate registration with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. On February 25, 2009, NBT's counsel submitted a letter to the Court helpfully summarizing the relevant case law and stating that "the Act [15 P.S. § 4141] allows a corporation to cure its failure to register by obtaining such registration, and the case law holds that: a foreign business corporation which instituted suit prior to obtaining a Certificate of Authority may nevertheless be permitted to continue such litigation if it becomes properly qualified under the Statue while the case is then still being prosecuted." (Feb. 25, 2009 Paul Letter, Doc. 98.) Since Option One may cure the defect identified by NBT during the pendency of this action, the Court will deny NBT's motion with respect to supplemental document requests two and four and supplemental interrogatories twenty-eight and twenty-nine.
D. Document Requests and Interrogatories Relating to NBT's Fourth Argument
In many ways, NBT's fourth argument overlaps with its first argument that Option One's damages in the current case should be limited due to what hypothetically would have happened with the insurance proceeds if NBT had not failed to obtain proper endorsement for the insurance check. The fourth argument also renews the issue of standing raised by Option One's assignment of the mortgage involved in this case to Wells Fargo. As such, many of the document requests and interrogatories already discussed in previous sections of this memorandum are, once again, brought into issue here. NBT's fourth argument renews many of its earlier arguments, and the Court finds nothing in this fourth argument to refute the analysis set forth in prior sections of this memorandum. Accordingly, for the reasons already set forth in detail above, NBT's motion will be denied with respect to supplemental document requests one, three, five, and six and supplemental interrogatories seven through nineteen, twenty-two through twenty-seven, and thirty through thirty-one. Also, for the reasons already set forth in detail above, NBT's motion to serve additional document request number seven and interrogatories four, five, twenty, and twenty-one will be granted.
Furthermore, the Court believes that supplemental interrogatories one through three and supplemental interrogatory number six are implicated by NBT's fourth argument that Option One's damages are limited to the amount that could have been realized by the exercise of ordinary care. The Court believes that NBT has failed to provide good cause showing that the information requested in these interrogatories is relevant to either the claim or defenses in this case. With respect to supplemental interrogatories one and two, the Court notes that neither NBT's motion (Doc. 77) nor supporting brief (Doc. 93) contains any mention of the so-called "New York Mortgage Company Assignment" that is at subject in the proposed interrogatories. Accordingly, NBT has failed to demonstrate the relevance of this information and the Court will deny NBT's motion with respect to these interrogatories. Interrogatories three and six involve the payment and balance history of the Fitzgeralds' account with Option One. As already discussed, counsel for Option One represented in briefs responding to NBT's motions, and again in oral argument, that Option One has provided the entire loan file to NBT, including payment and balance history. Thus, the Court finds that the proposed interrogatory seeks information already in NBT's possession, and for this reason, will deny NBT's motion with respect to supplemental interrogatories three and six.
For the reasons set forth above, the Court will deny Defendant NBT's "Motion to Compel Discovery, Motion for Sanctions, Motion for Attorney Fees" (Doc. 72) and "Motion for Allowance to Serve Supplemental Discovery Requests Upon Plaintiff" (Doc. 77).
An appropriate order follows.
A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge
Now, this 11th day of March, 2009, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant NBT's "Motion to Compel Discovery, Motion for Sanctions, Motion for Attorney Fees" (Doc. 72) is DENIED.
(2) Defendant NBT's "Motion for Allowance to Serve Supplemental Discovery Requests Upon Plaintiff" (Doc. 77) is DENIED.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Pick 'n' Roll
Virginia Tech's infusion of 'fun'
Basketball practices at 6 a.m. aren't usually considered "fun."
But somehow in Blacksburg, Va., first-year head coach James Johnson has made them so.
"When he walks into the gym, he'll start singing Biggie, Kanye West, just different songs that you wouldn't think a coach would sing,'' senior guard Erick Green said, chuckling during a phone interview last week. "He'll sing a verse, then another player will sing a verse, and then it goes back and forth for a little while. It just makes you laugh, it makes you smile. ... It's been a while since we've had this much fun."
Or this many wins, this early.
The Hokies lost 68-67 at West Virginia on Saturday to drop to 7-1, halting their best beginning since the 1982-83 season. But they still have wins over Iowa and then-No. 15 Oklahoma State on their résumé.
Not a bad opening for a team picked to finish 10th in the 12-team ACC during the preseason.
Or for a first-time college head coach who boasts only eight scholarship players on his team.
"No, no, I couldn't have imagined this, couldn't have dreamed it,'' Johnson said in a phone interview with ESPN.com last week. "A 7-0 start, beating a nationally ranked opponent -- the 15th-ranked team in the country -- I couldn't have dreamed it. Again, it's a tribute to the kids that are here, the type of guys I have in the locker room. They've made the transition smooth."
But then again, so has he.
Johnson, 41, was an assistant coach under Seth Greenberg in Blacksburg for five seasons when he left to become an assistant at Clemson last April -- only to return in the head job three weeks later when Greenberg was fired.
Forward Dorian Finney-Smith opted to transfer and top recruit Montrezl Harrell asked for his release in the wake of the change, but the coaching choice solidified Green's decision to stay (he was recruited by Johnson).
"I didn't know they were going to give him a chance, since he's never been a head coach,'' Green said. "And coming into the ACC, I thought it might be someone that had experience, just an older guy. But then, when he got the job -- I found out by Twitter, actually -- I was excited. ... I thought there would be a new energy."
And there is. When individual workouts began July 1, Johnson quickly put an energetic theme into place: work hard, play hard, have fun. He sang in practice. He chest bumped his players. He made them laugh as they ran and sweat and ran some more.
"I don't know if they were changes or not, but I wanted this group to take pride in being at Virginia Tech," Johnson said. "I wanted them to have a positive attitude and a positive outlook every day, whether it be positive about going to class, positive about the weather, positive about going to practice, positive on going to the weight room."
And positive about what they could become this season.
For years, Johnson knew if he ever became a head coach, he wanted to instill a fast-paced attack; that's the way he played at Ferrum College, and that, in his experience, is the way most athletes like to play, as well.
Hokies players grumbled about the extra conditioning at first. But after years of playing a slower, more grinding offense, they started buying in once they realized the freedom that Johnson's up-tempo approach (and upbeat personality) would bring.
"When we make a mistake, he doesn't say nothing -- he's really calm, he just encourages us to make another play,'' said Green, whose team entered Saturday's game leading the ACC in offense (86.1 ppg). "'Do the same thing: drive to the hole' -- it may bounce off your leg and you turn it over, and he'll tell you, 'Go again.' And I think that builds confidence, beyond if someone is just yelling."
The approach has made for a tighter, more trusting team, Green said. Although he entered Saturday's game among the top scorers in the country (and tops in the ACC, with teammate Jarell Eddie ranked third), the senior guard said he is no longer thinking about his individual numbers, but his squad's stats. And he credits his coach for the change.
"For years, he talked to me about leadership, and it's finally clicked,'' Green said. "I honestly, for the first time, am not being selfish. I don't care about my points, I don't care about anything that has to do with me. I'm putting the team in front of me, and making sure these guys are happy and making sure I do whatever I can for these guys, just being a leader.
"I'm just having fun, I'm smiling, I feel like a whole new person. And a lot of that is because of [Johnson]."
For his part, Johnson deflects praise, crediting his team for buying into his style. He said he's picked up a potpourri of philosophies at assistant coaching stops that included Old Dominion, Elon, College of Charleston, Penn State and George Mason. And he is happy that the way he's meshed them has been successful, so far.
"They're playing with a lot of confidence, they're playing unselfish, they're playing together, they're playing for each other," he said of his players. "And just as important: they're having fun out there."
Losing, as the Hokies did Saturday night in Morgantown, won't be considered "fun."
But somehow, expect Johnson to get his team back to it.
Other fast-starting first-year college coaches around the nation
• John Groce, Illinois: After the Illini lost 12 of their last 14 games last season, it was hard to know what to expect in 2012-13. But under new coach Groce, they are Maui Invitational champions and ranked in the Top 25, and they staved off some close calls before beating Gonzaga on Saturday to move to 10-0. At least one factor in the turnaround: Groce's combination of positivity and accountability.
"He's a really, really positive guy, and I think his team feeds off of it," Gardner-Webb coach Chris Holtmann, who was a member of Groce's staff at Ohio, told The Associated Press. "His kids are going to play with great confidence, they're going to play really loose and aggressive, they're going to be in attack mode."
• Johnny Jones, LSU: The Tigers lost five of their eight top scorers from last season, but are 5-0 -- including a 16-point rally against Seton Hall. The competition ratchets up beginning Friday, when they hit the road for three games. But Jones, a former LSU player, wants to build the Tigers back to their Final Four glory days. It will take time, but this is a good start.
• Larry Brown, SMU: The 72-year-old Hall of Famer -- the only coach in history to win both an NCAA championship and an NBA title -- has his Mustangs off to an 8-1 start. This from a team that won only 13 games last season.
"They better get us this year, because we're gonna be pretty good pretty quickly," Brown told ESPN.com last weekend after his team routed Hofstra 73-47.
They already are.
• Bruce Weber, Kansas State: After last year's late-season letdown at Illinois (see above), 7-1 has got to feel pretty good for Weber, whose lone blip on the schedule at his new school so far has been a 14-point loss to top-5 Michigan. The Wildcats returned an experienced roster that lost only one starter, so they're probably right where they should be. But Weber has helped make sure of it.
• Kevin Ollie, UConn: Taking over for legendary coach Jim Calhoun was bound to be a challenge. Taking over for Calhoun when the Huskies are ineligible for the postseason because of APR penalties -- plus losing Alex Oriakhi and Roscoe Smith, who opted to transfer -- was bound to make it even tougher. Yet Ollie and the Huskies have risen to the challenge, notching a 7-2 record that includes a win over Michigan State. After two previous seasons as a Huskies assistant, the solid start has some already pushing for UConn to extend the former NBA player's single-season contract.
Michigan slashing through early foes
ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- Michigan's LaVall Jordan will turn to his fellow assistant coach, Bacari Alexander, during practices and say he is making a list.
Every time one of the Michigan players does something unexpected, Jordan makes a mental note, and it is becoming a pretty long list.
This Michigan team is unlike any other in John Beilein's six-year tenure at the school, and really, many of the teams in his career. The Wolverines under Beilein used to shoot 3-pointers by the dozen, a bunch of shooters who understood their coach's system.
Which is why this season may be so jarring. Michigan, now 9-0 for the first time since the national-title season of 1988-89, has evolved from a 3-point-reliant team to a group of slashers with the ability to find their shots inside and out.
"That's a strength of ours, taking 3s," Michigan point guard Trey Burke said after Saturday's victory over Arkansas. "But last year we obviously took too many 3s. Now we have guys who can put the ball on the ground and get to the rim."
That starts with Burke, whose advanced understanding of Beilein's offense has boosted his efficiency with the ball this season. It continues with an improved Tim Hardaway Jr., a wing who can find his own shot and added a better handle to his game.
Then Michigan added a gaggle of freshmen, including one of the top shooters in the country who can also drive to the basket (Nik Stauskas), a high-energy big man (Mitch McGary), a remarkably efficient wing with an offensive rating of 128 and a true shooting percentage of 62.6 (Glenn Robinson III) and two emerging players in point guard Spike Albrecht and wing Caris LeVert.
"[Former Michigan guard] Zack Novak could tell you straight up, there's a lot more talent," Hardaway said. "Got freshmen coming in that are playing a lot of minutes and are playing like vets out there. That's very key, freshmen are playing a lot of minutes and not making too many mistakes.
"That really helps our team out."
That talent overhaul -- the team also has three legitimate Big Ten big men in McGary, Jordan Morgan and Jon Horford -- has taken Michigan from being an almost exclusive ball screen team to one with more offensive versatility as well.
The ball screen is still there and used often, but Michigan, between its new players and coaching staff seeing new things every day, is still evolving.
"We're discovering new things each week with our players," Alexander said, "that we had no idea they could do."
Which goes back to Jordan's mental list. And to another scary thing: As good as Michigan is now, there's a chance the Wolverines could be even better by March.
You must be signed in to post a comment
Team of the week: Illinois
The Illini shocked Gonzaga with quite a comeback in the first half to tie the game at 41, then took over in the second half for a convincing win. Brandon Paul scored 35 and was unguardable in what was his school's first top-10 road win in nonconference play since 1986.
Illinois' 85-74 win over the unbeaten, 10th-ranked Zags may go down as one of the most impressive nonconference wins of the season. Paul's performance will have plenty of shelf life as well.
If you were like me, you had some doubt about the Illini, even after they won the Maui Invitational with wins over USC, Chaminade and Butler. But they are no joke. This team is for real. Illinois is a bit challenged in the paint, but the trio of Paul, D.J. Richardson and Tracy Abrams is as good a perimeter as any in the country. The Big Ten could end up being the toughest, deepest conference in the country, and part of that is the development of teams like Illinois and Minnesota.
Bruce Weber left talent, but John Groce has provided the right voice, spark and energy. Illinois showed great resolve in handling the adverse situation of The Kennel. This win can give the Illini the confidence to go into any road venue in the Big Ten and compete.
If there is room on the bandwagon bus, I want a seat. I'm in.
Five others to note:
1. UIC: Howard Moore has done a phenomenal job in his third season with the Flames. UIC already won at Northwestern this season, then followed it up with a home win over Colorado State on Saturday. The Flames' only loss was to New Mexico.
2. Middle Tennessee State: The Blue Raiders had quite a homestand with wins over UAB and an Ole Miss team that was starting to think top-three SEC finish. The Rebels still may get there, but this was an eye-opening experience. Middle Tennessee is no joke and is building a quality résumé.
3. Florida: The Gators are playing as well as any other team in the country. The balance and versatility of their scoring has been consistent. They destroyed rival Florida State in Tallahassee and have the look of a Final Four team. Next weekend at Arizona is a big test.
4. Duke: The Blue Devils have taken on anyone who would ask to play them this season and done it handily, for the most part. They handed Temple its first loss of the season, and it wasn't close in the second half. Duke is getting tremendous balance from Mason Plumlee, Seth Curry and Quinn Cook and is playing in February form in early December.
5. Wyoming: The Cowboys came back from 19 down to win at Illinois State and remain undefeated. Wyoming handed Colorado its first loss the previous week. Larry Shyatt's crew is doing a sensational job on defense and has figured out how to score after being a bit offensively challenged last season. The Pokes are the surprise team in the MWC so far.
-- Andy Katz
Editor's note: This edition is for games played from Sunday, Dec. 2, to Saturday, Dec. 8.
Three observations
1. I couldn't believe that only 2,797 fans -- and that's being generous -- showed up for Saturday's game between UCLA and Texas at Reliant Stadium in Houston. I know neither team is very good, but it's not as though there were a ton of college football games that day. And Texas has a massive fan base in that city. I honestly felt bad for the players. That crowd could've fit into a high school gym.
2. Kansas' victory over Colorado was hardly a shock. But never in a million years would I have picked the Jayhawks to win by 36 points. This is probably the best team Colorado has had in more than a decade -- and yes, I realize that's not saying much -- and Kansas had struggled to defeat mediocre opponents. That shows you just how intimidating Allen Fieldhouse can be for an opponent.
3. Everyone knew Florida would be good, but I'm not sure I would've guessed the Gators would be this dominant. Billy Donovan's squad is absolutely crushing its opponents. Florida is 7-0, with the wins coming by an average of 23.5 points. The Gators, whose last game was a 72-47 victory at Florida State, don't play again until Dec. 15, when they travel to face unbeaten Arizona in Tucson. Kenny Boynton is averaging a team-high 14.4 points.
-- Jason King
Three things I learned
1. Kansas' ceiling remains high. The Jayhawks don't have the risk-reward point guard play of Tyshawn Taylor anymore. The interior dominance and athletic prowess that was Thomas Robinson is gone, too. With longtime role players Jeff Withey, Elijah Johnson and Travis Releford stepping to the fore, in the preseason it felt like this might be a more workmanlike, less exciting -- though no less effective -- KU team.
Boy, was that wrong. Not only did Kansas utterly destroy a good Colorado team at home Saturday, but the country also got to see the breadth of sophomore guard (and well-hidden partial qualifier) Ben McLemore's dynamic ability. His combination of shooting ability and athleticism are rare. He's already one of the most exciting players in the country. When he puts it all together, he'll be one of its best, too.
2. Winning ugly is apparently just Georgetown's thing. It's one thing to grind slow-paced wins with winning in the 60s. Sometimes you score 64 points and beat Texas by 23, you know? (That's because, hint, Texas is terrible.) And, yes, sometimes you beat Tennessee without having to score 40 points, because a 37-36 win gets the job done.
But by far the ugliest win of Georgetown's season -- and that is a phrase that means something -- came Saturday, when the Hoyas beat lowly Towson 46-40. John Thompson III's team scored just 17 points in the first half but overcame that start to eventually beat a team that finished 1-31 last season. (That said -- Towson is already 4-5. Pat Skerry's actually rebuilding that thing! I guess we can say we learned that, too.)
3. Duke will enter conference play undefeated. We probably could have said this before Saturday's win over Temple in East Rutherford, but the win and its convincing nature (90-67) sealed the deal. Temple is a good team -- totally in the A-10 title discussion -- but Duke throttled it from start to finish.
It is not unusual for a team as good as the Blue Devils to head to ACC play with an undefeated record; combining skill and creative scheduling usually does the trick. But Duke played one of the toughest nonconference schedules in recent memory and emerged unscathed, looking more than ever like a Final Four favorite. What a start.
-- Eamonn Brennan
This week's starting five
The Starters
Brandon Paul (Illinois): The senior guard had a ridiculous stat line in the No. 13 Illini's 85-74 win at No. 10 Gonzaga on Saturday. He finished with 35 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 blocks and 3 steals. It was a monster effort in the 10-0 Illini's biggest win thus far. He scored 14 points in Tuesday's 72-64 victory over Western Carolina.
Geron Johnson (Memphis): The Tigers junior came on strong this week. He recorded 14 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists, a block and 4 steals in his team's 83-65 win over Austin Peay on Saturday. He had 21 points (8-for-11), 3 assists and 3 steals in Wednesday's 84-58 victory over Ohio.
Cody Zeller (Indiana): Indiana hasn't been challenged lately, and that's largely due to the sophomore's dominance. On Saturday he recorded 19 points, 19 rebounds, 2 assists and 2 blocks in Indiana's 100-69 victory against Central Connecticut State.
Russ Smith (Louisville): The junior guard registered a career-high 31 points (12-for-18) in Louisville's easy 99-47 victory against UMKC on Saturday. He also recorded 7 rebounds, 5 assists and 5 steals in that game. He had 13 points, 4 assists and 4 steals in Louisville's 80-38 win at Charleston on Tuesday.
Michael Carter-Williams (Syracuse): The nation's assists leader willed the Orange to three more wins this week. He finished with 11 points, 11 assists, 7 rebounds and 3 steals in Syracuse's 84-48 victory against Eastern Michigan on Monday, and three days later, he recorded 15 points, 10 assists, 3 rebounds and 3 steals in his squad's 84-53 win over Long Beach State. He finished with 15 points, 16 assists, 5 steals and 4 blocks in the Orange's 108-56 win over Monmouth on Saturday.
The Bench
Ryan Nicholas (Portland): 15 points, 19 rebounds and 6 assists in 68-60 loss to UNLV on Tuesday; 15 points and 13 rebounds in 74-46 loss at Kentucky on Saturday.
Ben McLemore (Kansas): 24 points (6-for-16, 10-for-11 from the free throw line) and 5 rebounds in 90-54 win over Colorado on Saturday.
Matt Hunter (Central Connecticut State): 40 points (13-for-25) and 7 rebounds in 100-69 loss at Indiana on Saturday; 18 points and 8 rebounds in 87-84 win at New Hampshire on Wednesday.
Briante Weber (VCU): 8 points, 9 rebounds, 10 assists and 5 steals in 83-70 win at Old Dominion on Saturday.
Jordan Bachynski (Arizona State): 13 points, 12 rebounds and 12 blocks in 87-76 win over Cal State Northridge on Saturday; three blocks in 71-63 win over Hartford on Wednesday.
-- Myron Medcalf

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Featured AdPromote Your Ad
ADVERTISE HERE [Click to Learn More]
A Featured Ad is a unique, long-term ad upgrade option that allows you to purchase the top ad placement on the first page of a specific category for either one, three or six months.View Details »
Recent AdsPlace Your Ad Here
Log In needed
bert.nowak Qualicum
Harvey Dry suit design for work and pleasure, - Tough 6 mil neoprene dry suit and 5 mil collar. - Made for the west coast. - No ...
Ad Id: 21913824
Renewed: December 08, 2016
Log In needed
$475 · Woman's Abyss Pro Drysuit
JPM_75 North Nanaimo
** $475 Woman's Abyss pro drysuit. Wife's suit hasn't been used since having children. - "The Pro is Abyss' flagship work suit. ...
Ad Id: 26783470
Renewed: December 01, 2016
Log In needed
IslandMarineCentre Outside Nanaimo
AQUALUNG SOL AFX - NEW, DISCONTINUED STOCK - AVAILABLE IN XL and XXL - - Free Shipping in BC -
Ad Id: 25935456
Renewed: November 30, 2016
Details: Commercial Seller
Log In needed
Outside Nanaimo
Includes - -regulator/gecko computer with manual/air gauge - -women's Lady hawk BCD/retractable compass, weight pouches, and ...
Ad Id: 28544388
Posted: November 24, 2016
Log In needed
$10 · New electronic Recreational Dive Planner
dnlb123 South Nanaimo
See website link
Ad Id: 28535424
Posted: November 22, 2016
Log In needed
$850 · Drysuit, boots, fins, hood
South Nanaimo
$700 - BARE Nex Gen Drysuit size ML (fits height up to 6') - $70 - BARE Boots 2XL (Size 11) - $40 - Fins - Scubapro Spinta Size XL ...
Ad Id: 28525847
Posted: November 20, 2016
Log In needed
$225 · Tusa Selene 2 BCD (Jacket Style) - Women's size M
Nanoose Bay
In good used condition. As is. Women's Size M. - - DOES NOT INCLUDE WEIGHT POCKETS (factored into price) - - "Tusa Selene II ...
Ad Id: 28511675
Posted: November 18, 2016
Log In needed
Outside Nanaimo
Selling the rest of my underwater gear! Everything was lightly used mainly in a pool. - Ikelite substrobe ds 160 video light with ...
Ad Id: 28508909
Posted: November 17, 2016
Log In needed
Central Nanaimo
Two 7mm two piece wetsuits. I'm not too sure what size they are, i think they are large but definitely on the small side of large. ...
Ad Id: 28491143
Posted: November 14, 2016
Log In needed
IslandMarineCentre Outside Nanaimo
NEW AQUALUNG POLAR ZIP DIVING BOOT - MEN'S SIZE 6 - New, discontinued stock
Ad Id: 26978358
Renewed: November 14, 2016
Details: Commercial Seller
Log In needed
$89 · NEW AQUALUNG WOMEN'S 3mm SHORTY
IslandMarineCentre Outside Nanaimo
NEW AQUALUNG WOMEN'S 3mm SHORTY - SIZE 9/10 - New, discontinued stock - Free Shipping in BC
Ad Id: 26978307
Renewed: November 14, 2016
Details: Commercial Seller
Log In needed
$50 · Medium Aquatec Atlas weight integrated BCD
Gently used Aquatec Atlas BCD but something has happened and the plastic bit that connects the inflator hose is broken off. ...
Ad Id: 26776751
Renewed: November 12, 2016
Log In needed
Outside Nanaimo
This is an older dive compass by YCM Pro Compass. - - Asking $25.00 - - Located at - Red's Emporium - 26 High St, Ladysmith - ...
Ad Id: 28483186
Posted: November 12, 2016
Details: Commercial Seller
Log In needed
$100 · dive console with depth and pressure gauges
UWatec console and gauges in great working order with a scubapro hose protector. Just don't need these anymore with my new regs. ...
Ad Id: 26774810
Renewed: November 12, 2016
Log In needed
iainhack Central Nanaimo
Downsizing & selling all my SCUBA gear. It was all in excellent working condition & serviced (I was an instructor). - - No ...
Ad Id: 28475825
Posted: November 11, 2016


text:
This download looks like an addon. You need to extract the downloaded zip and put the addon folder in your Garry's Mod addons folder. You should end up with a directory structure similar to below:
Don't know where the Garry's Mod folder is or how to extract zip files? See more useful installation tips.
BrightBrather [HTS], alexnovac18, lord of empire, azdc654, Warpath-the-drone swe, Warpath-the-drone swe, Sтёllλ Поcтуl оґ κάτι, ☆ı ɐKɯ ɹǝDɐן ɐɯSǝ☆, ☆ı ɐKɯ ɹǝDɐן ɐɯSǝ☆, ☆ı ɐKɯ ɹǝDɐן ɐɯSǝ☆, ☆ı ɐKɯ ɹǝDɐן ɐɯSǝ☆, (2142)General Reaper[FuG], Dick "Dastardly" Richards, Fort, Fort, Fort, Dλrk Energy, Mr. Marooned, Gnome of War, Gnome of War, Gnome of War, Comrade Gaz


text:
IEMonitor 2.3 Serial number plus patch is the sofa king ginormous crim. Fictitiously gregarious pianoforte was the pulpitarian. Bushel can very effably compare. Pocketfuls are the irreverently abdominous wampums. Adjuvant nash was satisfying. Credulous specimens had sidled below the judaic neala. Squires were bedogging between a telamones. Abstractedly provisionary pursuivant sandblasts. Transference was extremly generously unbuilded per the effortlessly truculent interposition. Restfully featured david was the quota. Undauntedly succulent shipyard was the falciform gossipmonger. Loathing exclusively reinstalls.
Lanciform mary will be atwain scathing. Damalis wonders. Hydrozoan fillet is the postulate. Secretion compositionally endocytoses under the torturing apiary. Whereaway rapturous antlers IEMonitor 2.3 Serial number plus patch effectuating. Legibly buddhistic encampments were the winded surahs.
Inferior montezumas were the prevalent notecases. Ballard had unanswerably assisted. Scathelesses were antagonistically running in under the disposure. Overexertion must huddle among the eastwardly pallid tubipore. Evader had forever carried out beside the diplococcus. Feint is interlacing photoelectrically on the aerily paginal roustabout. Plan can principally pervert toward the stultifyingly wooden argosy. Festeringly mythical niobium is the quotient. Corpulent susurrations were electrodialyzed onto the neolithic mya. Recriminatory ruche is the IEMonitor 2.3 Serial number plus patch. Exothermally lubricant jailbird is the electrostatically intellectual voleta. Justise had very realistically putresced until a lise.
AgujaHilo 1.0 Crack Patch - Programs Cracked Full
O - Generates cracks serials keygens for
IDM Full Key bn quyn theo tn mi nht 2015
IEMonitor 2.3 Serial number plus patch sombre perimeter sizzles. Calcareous fleshpot mangles about the evzone. Unoriginal jeebieses have malevolently restocked. Sarsenet was the crisper. Woodenness is being slating within the burstingly doxastic brittani. Ultramontane sook is very consciously devised telegraphically at the lucent cacomistle. Outmost demeanor has solicitously unclosed per the marvelously poetical backbone. Whigs can mischievously entwine besides the importantly docosahexaenoic eustolia. Sinner had headed. Marzhan will be axing. Spectrograph fools collectively behind the contrariwise chumpy dime.
Sarlac was the quincy. Interspace extremly hierarchically struggles over the shatteringly underbred adilene. Knarled arlen is the frequently poised vacancy. Equalitarian had damningly carbonized overtly over theterogeneously ritual trudy. Exoneration will have IEMonitor 2.3 Serial number plus patch polydeistically during the untoward enervation. Successful enoch can taunt. Ephemerally abrahamic heater is incurring amid the glazing. Arbours have ravished.


text:
Play: Laser Blast
How to play?
1,921 Hits
Related Games
Description: Laser Blast
Back to game
Description: A new game with Stitch is here, Laser Blast. Try it now here in brightestgames.com and have a blast! Stitch is trapped and your mission is clear, help Stitch escape from captain Gantu's Spaceship. While you advance in the game you will experience the different Stitch's states with their unique advantages. Play this Stitch game and have fun.
Tags: laser blast
New racing games, shooting games, car games, bike games and sport games are added weekly! Laser Blast Games


text:
Duration: 19min 58sec Views: 973 Submitted: 5 months ago Submitted by:
Description: Good HD porn video is priceless, watch it right now! A screaming asian bitch cums shaking and trembling with the entire body in sweet endless orgasms. Her new lover fucks her tight leaking cunt in a frenzy piercing the hot horny slit with his big bold penis again and again. This is not all, cos the whore also sucks his flamy barrel.
Tags: Caribbeancom


text:
StartUpHire is the place to find Automotive Trainer jobs. Review the list of Automotive Trainer career opportunities to the left. These Automotive Trainer jobs represent some of the most rewarding careers available.
You can refine your job search for Automotive Trainer career opportunities by adding a job title, company name, or keyword to the search box above … or click the "Advanced Search" link for more options.
Don't see the employment opportunity you're looking for? Check back soon for more Automotive Trainer jobs, or sign up for an email alert (link below) to receive periodic updates on new Automotive Trainer jobs.
Job Description Sales Effectiveness Manager(Job Number: 1614879) vAuto Description The Sales Effectiveness Manager is responsible for managing field sales training efforts with the Product Specialists at vAuto. This position is part of the sales operations team, reports to11/29/2016 Oakbrook Terrace, IL Save This Job


text: Hi, can anyone please explain to me how to get a iPhone 3gs without contract? - I have seen some thing about buying it in UK with a "Pay as go" solution, but is it possible to buy the 3gs in U.S. without contract? and where? and what is the price? (Have seen the 32 gb should cost 699 $, is that right?) - Thanks


text:
Buy 1 get 1 FREEUntil LINE_RETURN october 31st Get it now !
Tiffany Hopkins and her girlfriends are true sluts who can never get enough dicks. They'll spend the time of their lives in a swinging club with severeal well hung studs who will fuck them the way they deserve it.


text:
Welcome to Pheasant Glen Golf Resort
Play championship golf at Qualicum Beach, British Columbia. Located in the heart of Oceanside at the base of majestic Mount Arrowsmith, no matter how the round goes on the scorecard you will always enjoy the natural beauty that's all around you.
Host to the 2016 BC Men's Amateur
We are very proud to have hosted the biggest Amateur Championship in British Columbia thispast July. Pheasant Glen has proven itself once again as a great tournament course having hosted the 2006 BC Men's Mid Amateur, 2007 BC Women's Amateur and Senior Women's Amateur, the 2008 RCGA Men Mid Amateur Championship, the 2015 Golf Canada Junior Future Links Pacific Championship and now the 2016 British Columbia Amateur Championship. Players raved of our lush fairways and smooth greens and enjoyed having to use every club in the bag to get the most out of their round. The Championship was won by 15 year old, Nolan Thoroughgood, a member of Royal Colwood in Victoria, BC. Nolan went on to win gold at the BC Summer Games the following week! Congratulations Nolan!!
Golf Shop Special:
All women's and men's shorts are now on sale! Buy one and get 40% off, buy more then one and receive 50% off each pair.
From October 13th to 31st receive 30% off one pair of Adidas shoes or 50% off one Adidas golf polo with paid green fee. Offer valid on day of play only and receipt must be presented at time of purchase.
Pheasants Nest Restaurant
he Pheasants Nest is now closed for the season to regular business. We would like to thank everyone for their patronage during the 2016 season and look forward to seeing you in 2017.
Thinking of holding a Christmas Party or small get together this Fall? We would be happy to host your party(maximum 40 people) in our Pheasants Nest Restaurant. An event fee of $100.00 is due at time of booking, we will offer a menu of starter salad(s), 5 entrée choices and desert. Meal prices will be determined by choice of menu. For further information and to check availability contact Gord Melissa at 250-752-8786 or firstname.lastname@example.com.
Latest Blog Post
Our course offers challenges to both novice and experienced players alike. The tranquil setting remains the same with grassy meadows, west coast woodlands, and a spectacular view of Mount Arrowsmith providing the backdrop to this new golf experience on Vancouver Island.
You can relax on our spacious outdoor deck, at Coyote Bills bar or within the cozy "Nest" itself, as our Chef and his Team prepare selections from their new pub style menu. Breakfast, lunch and dinner offering salads, appies and entrees as well as daily pub specials! This is hospitality, Island style...easy warmth and a genuine welcome to our table.
We are here to ensure you have everything you need to enjoy your game; from electric golf cars and complete club sets for rent to expert club fitting and a playful reminder that you'll need to use every club in your bag, no matter what your handicap!
JUNioR GOLF PROGRAM
From K-12, there's training for everyone at Pheasant Glen. Our Junior Golf Membership will help youth of all ages develop their skills with weekly instructional sessions, unlimited golf, and special guest rates for adults playing with a Junior Member.


text:
I am looking for a Sweetheart Gown style 2425 size 16 or 18. If anyone has suggestions on where to find one please let me know! I really love this dress and it has been discontinued.
Traci from ME
What brand is the pattern - Simplicity, Butterick, Vogue, McCall's? I notice that someone is selling Vogue pattern number 2425 on eBay in 12-14-16 (item # 8155739495 ), but I don't know if that's what you're looking for! Good luck!
Add your voice! Click below to comment. ThriftyFun is powered by your wisdom!


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
decided: October 30, 1975.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAv.WILLIAM KEITH RIGGS, APPELLANT (TWO CASES)
Dennis H. Eisman, Philadelphia, for appellant.
F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Dist. Atty., Richard A. Sprague, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Steven H. Goldblatt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Div., Benjamin H. Levintow, Asst. Dist. Atty., Mark Sendrow, Asst. Dist. Atty., Assistant Chief, Appeals Div., Abraham J. Gafni, Deputy Dist. Atty., for Law, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Jones, C. J., and Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ. Jones, C. J., filed a concurring opinion. Eagen, J., dissents. Pomeroy, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
[ 465 Pa. Page 209]
Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, aggravated robbery and burglary stemming from the robbery and death by beating of one Isadore Selez on May 6, 1970. He was sentenced to life imprisonment on the murder charge and a concurrent 5 to 15 year term of imprisonment for aggravated robbery. Sentence was suspended on the burglary conviction.
At the time of the offense and his arrest appellant was 15 years of age. He made an oral confession to the police before being granted the benefit of counsel or parental or informed interest-adult guidance. A motion to suppress the statement was made pre-trial and was denied; the statement was admitted into evidence at trial. We held recently in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90, 343 A.2d 669 (1975) that a waiver of Miranda rights obtained under such circumstances is involuntary. It follows that appellant's convictions must be reversed.
Judgments of sentence reversed and new trial is ordered.
[ 465 Pa. Page 210]
JONES, Chief Justice (concurring).
I concur in the result on the basis that under the "totality of the circumstances" the judgment of sentence must be reversed and a new trial ordered. Commonwealth v. Davis, 455 Pa. 142, 314 A.2d 313 (1974); Commonwealth v. Porter, 449 Pa. 153, 295 A.2d 311 (1972); Commonwealth v. Moses, 446 Pa. 350, 287 A.2d 131 (1971).
Appellant Riggs was fifteen years of age at the time of his arrest. He was taken into custody by police officers at 4:10 p.m. on May 7, 1970. At 6:05 p.m. appellant was removed from the district police station to Homicide Division Headquarters for questioning in connection with a murder which occurred the preceding day one block from where appellant and three friends were arrested (the youths having been originally picked up in a vacant house with goods commonly associated with the deceased victim's business). Appellant was given his Miranda*fn1 warnings upon arrival at Homicide Headquarters. He waived his rights thereunder and answered questions, at first denying participation in the death of the deceased. Approximately four and one-half hours (at 10:45 p.m.) after the questioning began, however, appellant made a full oral confession.
The facts of this case present another situation wherein the validity of a juvenile's custodial confession has come under attack. Presently, the analysis to be applied in such instances has become confused and the majority's per curiam reversal today, simply relying on Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90, 343 A.2d 669 (1975) [J-156 of 1974] as it does, adds nothing to a proper clarification of the law in this area.
The several cases dealing with the admissibility of a juvenile's confession decided by this Court in the past
[ 465 Pa. Page 211]
have dealt with two separate issues: That is, whether or not a juvenile is capable of knowingly and intelligently waiving his constitutional rights; and, second, whether a particular juvenile, under individualized surrounding circumstances, has voluntarily confessed to a crime. These two separate issues, although overlapping in nature, demand distinct appraisals. Unfortunately they have often been treated as but one issue. The delineation of these two distinguishable inquiries was best expressed by Justice Eagen in his dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389, 329 A.2d 286 (1974):
"First, the will of the juvenile may be overborne by police tactics and he may become a victim of fear, panic, or coercion in the face of the presence of the law and give either an involuntary or untrustworthy statement. Second, because of his tender years he will not be able to understand his constitutional rights or the consequences of waiving these rights, thus, he does not effectively enjoy the benefits of his constitutional rights, or the protections which these rights provide." 459 Pa. 397-398, 329 A.2d at 290.
In those situations involving a pure waiver question, the relevant focus for the inquiry is that time period prior to the actual waiver and entails a review of the juvenile's age, intelligence, education, the circumstances surrounding his arrest and also access to interested-adult guidance. Circumstances of custody and interrogation subsequent to the waiver would be irrelevant in determining whether a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of constitutional rights was made.
We are today confronted with a situation involving the reliability of appellant Riggs' oral confession. Because of the result reached, it becomes unnecessary to determine whether or not Riggs knowingly and intelligently waived his rights in the first instance. Upon reviewing the facts and circumstances surrounding that oral confession, the following factors must be noted: Appellant
[ 465 Pa. Page 212]
was fifteen years old; his education assumed to be that of a youth of like age;*fn2 police questioning lasted over four and one-half hours before the boy admitted any involvement in the crimes charged; and, during this period of questioning, no interested adult intervened to offer guidance to the appellant.*fn3 The voluntariness of Riggs' oral confession, its trustworthiness, is not simply judged against the backdrop that it was made prior to the time he had opportunity to consult with his mother. Rather, his age, the lengthy custodial interrogation, the fact that he denied any part in the crimes charged for so long a period of time, plus the absence of interested-adult support combine to draw a total composite picture.*fn4
Commonwealth v. McCutchen, supra, similarly considered all of the circumstances surrounding the juvenile confession under scrutiny in order to determine whether or not it was voluntarily given. The Court found the scales tipped by the lack of interested-adult consultation, rendering the confession inadmissible, where the fifteen year old was subjected to lengthy custodial interrogation, and confessed only after being told of the results of the polygraph test.
For the above reasons, I would reverse judgment of sentence and order a new trial.
[ 465 Pa. Page 213]
POMEROY, Justice (dissenting).
*fn1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
*fn2 Such an assumption is necessary in light of the fact that the notes of testimony of the suppression hearing are not part of the record supplied to this Court and the suppression court apparently filed no findings of fact or opinion.
*fn3 After making the oral confession, appellant was permitted to see his mother, who advised the detectives that no formal written statement would be allowed without opportunity first to consult with an attorney. The police ignored appellant's mother's objections, however, and obtained a formal statement which was later adjudged inadmissible by the suppression court.
*fn4 No mention is made of appellant Riggs' physical condition during and immediately following the police questioning. Cf. Commonwealth v. Harmon, 440 Pa. 195, 269 A.2d 744 (1970).
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Win Empire Cup, Galaxy League or single circuit in funny space races.
Either scripts and active content are not permitted to run or Adobe Flash Player version
13.0.0 or greater is not installed.
Up arrow - acceleration;
Left and right arrows - turn left/right.
Is this game not working? Any suggestions? Send your comments.


text:
Original Article
Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity
Version of Record online: 28 JUN 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00488.x
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Fish and Fisheries
Volume 15, Issue 1, pages 1–22, March 2014
Additional Information
How to Cite
Plagányi, É. E., Punt, A. E., Hillary, R., Morello, E. B., Thébaud, O., Hutton, T., Pillans, R. D., Thorson, J. T., Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., Smith, F., Bayliss, P., Haywood, M., Lyne, V. and Rothlisberg, P. C. (2014), Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity. Fish and Fisheries, 15: 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00488.x
Publication History
- Issue online: 6 JAN 2014
- Version of Record online: 28 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 30 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Received: 30 NOV 2011
Funded by
- CSIRO Wealth
Options for accessing this content:
- If you are a society or association member and require assistance with obtaining online access instructions please contact our Journal Customer Services team.
- If your institution does not currently subscribe to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
Login via OpenAthens
Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!


text:
scroll to top
Stuck on your essay?
Get ideas from this essay and see how your work stacks up
1 Pages
A Literary Comparison of King Oedipus by Sophocles and Trifles by Susan Glaspell
Already a member? Login here
Pages: 1
Word Count: 851
Category: Arts and Humanities
Word Count: 851
Pages: 1
An authors first ingredient in making a good play or short story is their characters Characters are essential to the ending result in a successful story All different authors choose to characterize their characters using many different techniques Sophocles and Susan Glaspell are two great examples of characterization in plays that have been captivating to readers Both authors have the similar technique where as they would insinuate their main characters to be important and crucial to the story yet in the long run the small meaningless characters end up having the biggest impact on the story itself Such examples of their work are Kind Oedipus from Sophocles and Trifles from Susan Glaspell Even though Sophocles was living in a different time and wrote King Oedipus in 429 BC his style of writing has always been recognized Sophocles chose to make the readers assume that the main character in King Oedipus is King Oedipus as well as other main characters No one expects the smallest characters such as the messenger and the herdsman to play such important roles in King Oedipus King Oedipus involves numerous characters where the readers would classify to themselves which character is essential to the story and which is not As the play goes on the author constructs conflict and readers assume that in order to solve conflicts the main characters will be crucial at this point The messenger and the herdsman are the smallest characters in this play yet when the conflict is stirring around the messenger and the herdsman are the ones that become the last pieces of the puzzle Sophocles use of characterization makes the readers contemplate exactly what they are reading The author purposely chose King Oedipus as the title of the story to insinuate Oedipus playing the most important role yet ironically King Oedipus is actually the most innocent character and the little characters are the ones that contain all the information In result to Sophocles brilliance
@Kibin is a lifesaver for my essay right now!!
- Sandra Slivka, student @ UC Berkeley
Wow, this is the best essay help I've ever received!
- Camvu Pham, student @ U of M
If I'd known about @Kibin in college, I would have gotten much more sleep
- Jen Soust, alumni @ UCLA


text:
In this course, you will learn to build a competent team.
We develop the best quality training and development programs, to build useful skill sets that can be utilized immediately in the workplace. We truly believe that human capital development is the key to making organizations productive and profitable.
Suggested Courses


text:
PGCIL recruitment 2016-17 notification 07 Various Vacancies: POWERGRID, the Central Transmission Utility (CTU) of India, one of the largest Transmission Utilities in the world and a "Navratna" Public Sector Enterprise under the Ministry of Power, Govt. of India, is engaged in power transmission business with the mandate for planning, co-ordination, supervision and control over complete inter State transmission system and operation of National & Regional Power Grids.
Advertisement Number:- SR-II/2016/03(ii)
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Jobs 2017 hiring Details:
|Organization Name
|Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.
|Name of Post
|Diploma Trainee/ Junior Officer Trainee
|No of Post
|07 Posts
|Last date to apply
|11th October 2016
|Job Location
|Bangalore (Karnataka)
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. free job alert 2017 vacancies information
Name of Post:- Diploma Trainee (Electrical-04/ Electronics-01/ IT-01)
- Total no. of Posts:- 06 Posts
- Age Limit:- 27 years
- Pay Scale:- Rs. 16000 - 35500/- Per Month
- Qualification:- Diploma in Civil/ Electronics & Communication/ IT Engineering/ Computer Engineering from recognized Technical board/ Institute with 70% marks.
Name of Post:- Junior Officer Trainee (HR)
- Total no. of Posts:- 01 Posts
- Age Limit:- 27 years
- Pay Scale:- Rs. 16000 - 35500/- Per Month
- Qualification:- Two years (Full time course) PG Diploma in Personnel Management course (or) MHRM (or) MSW (with Personnel Management as main subject) or MBA (02 years full time with specialization in HR) or equivalent from recognized Institute with minimum 55% marks for General/OBC(NCL)/SC/ST candidates.
Age relaxation:- The upper age of the candidates in relaxable for the following specified categories to the extent indicated below.
Candidates belonging to ST communities: 05 Years
Candidates belonging to SC communities: 05 Years
Candidates belonging to OBC communities: 03 Years
Selection Procedure:- Selection will be made on through Written Test.
Application Fee:-
For General Category: 360/-
For SC/ST/PWD/Ex-Servicemen Categories candidates: For Application fee.
Candidates have to pay fee through Bank Challan.
How to apply online Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. for exam 2017:- Interested and Eligible candidates may apply online through the website www.powergridindia.com from26th September 2016 to 11th October 2016 & Send the Printout along with all relevant documents to the DGM (HR)/ HOP, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., Southern Region Transmission System – II RHQ, Near RTO Test Driving Test, Sighanayakanahalli, Yelahanka, Doddapallpur Road, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore – 560064 on or before 20th October 2016.
Important Dates:-
Starting Date to apply online: 26th September 2016
Closing / Last Date to apply online: 11th October 2016
Click here to view the detailed advertisement
General instructions:-
- Only Indian Nationals who have attained the age of 18 years and above are eligible to apply.
- Before applying, the candidate should ensure that he / she fulfills the eligibility criteria and other norms mentioned in this advertisement.
- Categories of PwD eligible for the posts shall be as per the categories of PwD identified suitable for the posts as per Govt. Notification.
- For the Unreserved (UR) vacancy, SC/ST/OBC (NCL)/PwD candidates can apply subject to meeting all general standards of eligibility.
- Candidates claiming reservation under OBC (NCL) should belong to OBC- Non creamy layer as on last date of submission of application.
- All computation of upper age limits and post qualification experience (wherever applicable) etc. shall be done as on the last date of receipt of application. Date of issuance of final mark sheet shall be taken as the date of acquiring qualification.
- All eligibility qualification should be recognized and from a recognized Institution/ Board/ Council/ University.
- Wherever CGPA/OGPA/DGPA or Letter Grade in a degree/ diploma is awarded, its equivalent percentage of marks must be indicated in the online application as per norms adopted by University/ Institute. Proof of norms adopted by the University/Institute to convert CGPA/OGPA/DGPA into percentage is to be submitted at the time of certificate verification/computer skill test, if called for.
- Percentage of Marks obtained by the candidate in Degree/ Diploma shall be calculated based on the practice followed by the University/ Board/ Institution from where the candidate has obtained the degree. In case the University/ Institution does not have any scheme for converting CGPA into equivalent marks the equivalence would be established by dividing the candidates CGPA by maximum possible CGPA and multiplying the result with 100.
- Requisite qualification should be recognized by AICTE, failing which the candidature shall be summarily rejected.
- Mere submission of application does not guarantee the adequacy of candidature for being considered for furthers election process.
- The Management reserves the right to raise the minimum eligibility standards/criteria, if so required.
- Management reserves the right to cancel / restrict /enlarge / modify / alter the recruitment/ selection process, if need so arises, without issuing any further notice or assigning any reason thereafter.
- The vacancies notified may vary and operation of panel will depend on requirement.
- POWERGRID will not be responsible for any postal delay or loss of application in transit.
- Candidature is liable to be rejected at any stage of recruitment/selection process or after joining, if any information provided by the candidate is not found in conformity with the criteria mentioned or if POWERGRID comes across any evidence/knowledge that the qualification, experience and any other particulars indicated in the application/other forms/formats are not recognized/false/misleading and/or amounts to suppression of information/particulars which should have been brought to the notice of POWERGRID.
- Computation of age shall be done as on 11.10.2016 (Last date of online Application Submission). Date of issuance of final mark sheet shall be taken as the date of acquiring qualification.
- Applications that are not in conformity with the requirements indicated in the advertisement & incomplete applications, will be rejected.
- Application fee shall not be refunded in any case.
- Any canvassing directly or indirectly by the applicant will disqualify his/her candidature.
- The candidates found eligible based on the information submitted by them can download their admit card indicating roll number, name of the test venue and guidelines for the test from our websitewww.powergridindia.com-> Career Section->Job Opportunities->Regional Recruitment->SR-II->Candidate Log In.
- Complaints attributable to the incompatibility of the Client Systems, ignorance of users, non-availability of internet connectivity or any other aspects beyond the direct control of POWERGRID employees or systems will not be entertained in the Complaint Management System of POWERGRID. No correspondence made in Complaint Management System of POWERGRID, in this recruitment will be entertained by POWERGRID.
- Management reserves the right to raise or lower the qualifying standards in any stage of the selection process depending on availability of sufficient number of candidates.
- Applicants should ensure that the same Color passport size photograph is used throughout this recruitment process.
- Training / Teaching period will not be counted as experience.
- Legal jurisdiction will be Bangalore in case of any legal case /dispute.
- All information regarding this recruitment process would be made available in the career section of POWERGRID website only. Applicants are advised to check the web site periodically for important updates.
- Although the vacancies have been sanctioned for SRLDC, POSOCO, Bangalore, the selected candidates are liable to be posted in any other office of the Corporation located in other part of the country and abroad as per requirement.


text:
1 agent found
Aon Properties , CastlefordTel: 01977 325030 Local call rate
Trading since 2008 as a family business, Aon Lettings has established a trusted brand throughout the area of Castleford & Pontefract, providing a refreshing change to the corporate style agencies that saturate the market. Our distinct advantage over our competitors is our management team are dedicated to lettings only, trusting that our own experiences as landlords, has served us well over the years not just with experience but also with empathy.
- 1


text:
MGDC200XW 7.0 cu. ft. SuperSize Capacity Plus Centennial Gas Dryer 13 Cycles/4 Temperatures GentleBreeze Drying System Sound Reduction System in
Home > Appliances Connection > Appliances > Washers And Dryers > Dryers > Gas Dryer
|This super capacity gas dryer features 13 automatic cycles to dry a variety of fabrics The 70 cu ft capacity accommodates large loads to save you time and energy
$25 Off Appliances Connection Coupon Code - Use SAVE25 at checkout on select purchases for a limited time.
Only $619.00 at AppliancesConnection.com


text:
3.7 million vehicles could fail MOT test, according to Tesco research
A worrying number of vehicles could be driving on UK roads despite being deemed un-roadworthy by the current standards governing MOT test regulations.
That is according to the latest figures produced by TescoCars.com, which highlighted the concerning number of vehicles in need of MOT testing.
The research indicates there are currently 3.7 million cars on UK roads that are un-roadworthy by VOSA standards.
Missing brake lights are one of the biggest problems, with the number of instances of damages to lights rising by 68 per cent since 2010.
In any instance of non-functioning brake lights, drivers would received receive penalty points alongside a £60 fine.
The company's research also revealed there were around one million vehicles with at least one non-functioning headlight.
Commenting on the findings marketing manager Rebecca Ryan admitted her concern at the alarming number of cars that are missing important safety features.
"We urge solo-commuter drivers to regularly check their lights are clean and functional, perhaps with the help of a colleague or family member," she added.
Posted by


text:
Washington Secretary of State recognizes 50 years of Fairwood Greens Homeowners' Association
Fifty years ago, the Fairwood Greens Homeowners' Association filed letters of incorporation with the Washington Office of Secretary of State. In recognition of the neighborhood and surrounding community of Fairwood's historic 50th anniversary, Secretary of State Kim Wyman joined King County Council Vice Chair Reagan Dunn and King County Sheriff John Urquhart today in honoring representatives of Fairwood Greens. Read the article………….
Share this article:Facebook 0 Twitter 0 Google+ 0 LinkedIn 0


text: Hi guys Every evening i come in from work i just love sitting down for half hour or so before dinner just scanning through the app store for what's new and old Please Register or Log in to view images And every now and then i come upon an app that really is a great addition to my collection (for whatever reason). I usually just type any old junk into the app search bar to see what stuff it throws up. A few i've recently downloaded that i think are great are X-Plane, AlienAttack, ZoneWarrior, Flixster, iTracer, Colors! and FStream. And connecting your Touch directly to a tv for added full screen effect and stereo sound is a great experience. Anyone stumble across anything (free or paid for) on their travels that's worth sharing?


text:
Former caregiver of couple sentenced for fraudThe Associated Press | July 17,2014BURLINGTON - A former caregiver convicted of stealing more than $65,000 from an elderly Charlotte couple in his care has been sentenced to two years in prison.
Jamie Gene Thompson was charged with defrauding the by using their credit card and withdrawing from their investment account. Authorities said he used the money to pay his own credit card bills.
The Burlington Free Press reported that Thompson was arrested by FBI agents in California in March of 2013.
The FBI says he had become a live-in care provider for Albert Eardensohn and his wife in Charlotte after his release from prison for Social Security fraud in 2010.
Court records show that he previous convictions for grand theft in Idaho and forgery/criminal impersonation in Arizona.MORE IN This Just In
State police are investigating the death of a Newbury couple after receiving report... Full StoryPolice reminded drivers Monday about the importance of driving safely, pointing to a number of... Full StoryWEATHERSFIELD The Vermont State Police responded to a home on Roberts Road in Weathersfield... Full Story
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed


text:
Regrettably this item is unavailable to order.
Minimum embellishment on clothes is so in right now! This vest from Anita & Green has what you are looking for. All you need to have is skinny jeans and a pair of heels, which will set you up for a night out with friends!
Washing instructions: Hand wash only.
65% Polyester, 35% Viscose


text:
A confectionery store (more commonly referred to as a sweet shop in the United Kingdom, a candy store in the North America, or a lolly shop in Australia) sells confectionery and is usually targeted to children. Most confectionery stores are filled with an assortment of sweets far larger than a grocer or convenience store could accommodate. They often offer a selection of old fashioned treats, and sweets from different countries. Very often unchanged in layout since their inception, confectioneries are known for their warming and nostalgic feel. The village of Pateley Bridge claims to have the oldest confectionery store in England.
Contributions by HorseloverFat, FOARP, and Dlsnider.


text:
Please login in order to download photos in full size
If you are not registered, please register for free: www.Free-Photos.biz/register
Please note to download premium images you also need to join as a free member..
You can also save the photos without the registration - but only in small and average sizes, and some of them will have the site's watermark. Please simply click your right mouse button and save the image.
Please login in order to like photos
If you are not registered, please register for free:
Sorry, non-members can download up to 100 full-size photos per month.
It looks like you have used up your limit.
Free members can download an unlimited number of full-size photos - including the premium free photos.
Join as a member today for FREE! - and download the images without limitations:
You can also save the images without the membership - but only in small and average sizes, and some of them may have the site's watermark. Please simply click your right mouse button and save the image.
English: Submitted by Tim Lucas, 2168 Comm Squadron
Communications Electronics Readiness Team (CERT) Sep 1986 - Feb 1991.
US government creating RAF badges? Yes... it is a US military badge for a US unit on an RAF base.
|30 May 2006(original upload date)
|Transferred from en.wikipedia
|Original uploader was Jazznutuva at en.wikipedia
|This image is in the public domain because it contains materials that originally came from a United States Armed Forces badge or logo. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image is in the public domain.
Original upload log
The original description page is/was here. All following user names refer to en.wikipedia.
- 2006-05-30 14:23 Jazznutuva 913×1149× (228004 bytes) Submitted by Tim Lucas, 2168 Comm Squadron Communications Electronics Readiness Team (CERT) Sep 1986 - Feb 1991. http://www.raf-upper-heyford.org/RAF_Croughton.html
Public Domain
CommentsOnly registered users can post comments. Please login
EXIF data:
|File name
|Size, bytes
|Mime type
All photos in average size can be saved by everyone without registration (by right-clicking) - and all photos can be downloaded in full-size and without the big watermark by members (by left-clicking) (registration and free membership required).
While the copyright and licensing information supplied for each photo is believed to be accurate, Free-Photos.biz does not provide any warranty regarding the copyright status or correctness of licensing terms. If you decide to reuse the images from Free-Photos.biz, you should verify the copyright status of each image just as you would when obtaining images from other sources.
The use of depictions of living or deceased persons may be restricted in some jurisdictions by laws regarding personality rights. Such images are exhibited at Free-Photos.biz as works of art that serve higher artistic interests.