text:
Zeraffa Giraffa
Written by Dianne Hofmeyr
Illustrated by Jane Ray
Lovereading4kids Price £9.59
£11.99 saving £2.40 (20%)
Please login (or signup) to download the extract
You will need to Sign Up or Login before you can download a book extract.
To Sign Up all you need to do is give us your email address and a password and let us know the types of books you like. Thank you.
The Lovereading4Kids comment
One of our Books of the Year 2014 A giraffe in Paris! The idea sounds ridiculous but this beautiful picture book tells the true story of how the Pasha of Egypt sent a young giraffe called Zeraffa as a gift to the King of France. Captured on the plains of Africa, Zeraffa is too young to walk at first. Instead she is transported tied on to the side of a camel. From Africa Zeraffa, accompanied at all times by her Atir, a young boy who attends to her every need, travels by foot over land and briefly by sea when she must. Jane Ray's illustrations bring alive every detail of the journey and Zeraffa's triumphant welcome to Paris. They are especially entertaining capturing the ridiculous fashions that spring up around the city as everyone imitates all thing giraffe!
If you are a fan of Jane's artwork you will love her magical tale Ahmed and the Feather Girl, beautifully illustrated throughout with her detailed, fine drawings and vibrant use of colour. You can download an extract of it here.
Zeraffa Giraffa by Dianne Hofmeyr
Jane Ray's wonderful illustrations accompany the amazing true story of Zeraffa the Giraffe and her travels from her home in Africa to Europe, sent as a gift by the Ottoman Viceroy of Egypt to King Charles X of France in 1826.
A young boy, Atir, takes care of Zeraffa on her epic journey, by felucca down the Nile, and by ship across the sea. Zeraffa grows so tall that a hole is cut in the deck for her neck to go through, and the sailors sing songs as she gazes down at them. In France, Atir leads her through the countryside, and thousands of people marvel at Zeraffa in her yellow taffeta cloak. The whole of Paris falls in love with Zeraffa. The King builds her a special house in the Jardin des Plantes. On warm nights, the young princess, granddaughter of the king, visits and listens while Atir whispers stories to Zeraffa of a hot land far away, and on the breeze they all feel the kiss of Africa.
'This is a magical book about a true story...Ray's illustrations ...full of luminous colour and decorative patterns. Hofmeyr's test, took has a romantic lyricism... Both the images and the text make us feel the wonder and love that Zereffa inspired.'
- Nicolette Jones's Children's Book of the Week 'This is a magical book about a true story...Ray's illustrations ...full of luminous colour and decorative patterns. Hofmeyr's test, took has a romantic lyricism... Both the images and the text make us feel the wonder and love that Zereffa inspired.
- Nicolette Jones's Children's Book of the Week 'The inherently exotic figure of the giraffe is richly celebrated in this incredible true story ... Jane Ray's beautiful illustrations bring this curious and unlikely story alive, capturing the magnificence of Zereffa in alien surroundings.
'Sumptuously illustrated... A fascinating book.'
'exquisitely composed pictures'
'Jane Ray's illustrations are, as always, magical... The curves and grace of the paintings; the details, colours and characters in the scenes all build to create a sense of beauty and care and wonder... The lush language...is the kind of language that we should be whispering into the ears of our young children and encouraging our older children to form with their own mouths. It is beautiful and evocative and mysterious. It is the kind of language that can take you on an adventure... I love the way the whole book mirrors the character of Zeraffa - graceful and wise, playful and mischievous, but always with an air of magic and wonder.'
'The story of Zeraffa the Giraffe reads like a fairy tale. And is even more astonishing for being true! ... Jane Ray's illustrations are absolutely beautiful, giving the true story of Zeraffa a mythical feel. Zeraffa is a lovely book to give as a gift. The story will appeal to younger and older children, and adults will enjoy reading it too.'
'Gorgeous illustrations by Jane Ray enhance a topical tale by Diane Hoymeyr ... Rich in detail ...make beautiful presents for over-fives.'
'Beautiful... Jane Ray's illustrations bring alive every detail.'
'Wonderful... stunning... fantastic... The vivid illustrations really bring this amazing story to life.'
'Hofmeyr's narrative is short, but packs a huge amount in, and Jane Ray's illustrations perfectly match the singularity and strangeness of the story, a fairytale that just happens to be true. Each spread is a delight, a chapter in itself, with so much to read, observe and wonder at. A very special book indeed.'
'assuredly this beautifully told and illustrated story is an example of the oft said 'Truth is stranger than fiction.'
About the Author
Other Formats
Book Info
40 pages
Interest Age: From 3
Dianne Hofmeyr
More books by Dianne Hofmeyr
Author's Website
Frances Lincoln Childrens Books an imprint of Frances Lincoln Publishers Ltd
Publication date
3rd April 2014
Love "Lovereading4kids" as my son gets to hear about & read new books before his mates which keeps him interested in reading=a very happy MumLiz Evans
LoveReading4Kids is a modern and creative way of emphasising the value and importance of books in this digital age #booksforlifeAmrit Bunet – Teen
It's so easy to find the right book for your child. Such an easy-to-use, yet in-depth website. 100% reliable.Pippa, Jack, Liam & Matthew Wils
We love Lovereading4kids because they put books in front of us we wouldn't otherwise have read. They make us more adventurous readers!Emily Jacques
Writing reviews help the children with their literacy skills and we always read the books together which gives us good quality family time!Cat Bisland (on behalf of the Bi
I think Lovereading4kids is an amazing company because of the friendly staff and the fabulous chance to read great books before publication.Adam Graham
It's a community united by a passion for books and promoting the best there is in children's literature.Sam Bateman and family
I love Lovereading because I often never know what to read and this helps you find a good book. I have recommended this to many people.Shannon-Louise Masters – age 15


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
United States District Court, W.D. New York
November 21, 2014
EVONY CAPPS, Petitioner,v.SABRINA KAPLAN, Respondent.
MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Proceeding pro se, petitioner Evony Capps ("Capps" or "Petitioner") filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Capps is incarcerated as the result of a judgment entered against her in Erie County Court of New York State on February 21, 2007, following her guilty plea to one count of first degree manslaughter (N.Y. Penal Law § 125.20(1)).
II. Factual Background and Procedural History
The conviction here at issue stems from the fatal stabbing of Arthur Boyd ("Boyd" or "the deceased") on the evening of October 12, 2005, in front of the Shop Rite Market on Fillmore Street in the City of Buffalo. According to an eyewitness, Capps and Jalessa Clay ("Clay"), the girlfriend of the deceased, started fighting, and other individuals joined in the altercation. Boyd approached and attempted to intercede. During the melee, Boyd sustained stab wounds to the neck and abdomen and was transported by friends to the hospital.
Police officers who happened to be at the hospital upon Boyd's arrival spoke to one of the individuals accompanying him. This person told police that he had witnessed the incident and that a black female with blondish hair named "Ebony" had stabbed Boyd.
Based on this description of Boyd's assailant, police officers located Capps as she was walking home with one of her friends. At the police station, after waiving her rights, Capps gave a statement admitting getting involved in a fight with Clay. The girls had a "history" insofar as one of Capps' friends had "maced" the mother of one of Clay's friends. According to Capps, Clay instigated the fight by telling her she had a "smart mouth" that needed to be punched, and then proceeded to punch her in the mouth. The two young women started fighting. After being separated briefly, they "went at it again". While Capps was on top of Clay, Boyd walked up and pulled Capps off of Clay and said, "[Y]ou punched my baby's mother". Capps retorted with an expletive, Boyd punched her, and they began fighting. Boyd was on top of her when the police arrived but according to Capps, he got up and walked away. Capps denied having a knife or stabbing anyone, and stated she did not know who had been stabbed until after the police told her his name. Capps said that the guy who had been fighting her on the ground had been "fine" after he had gotten up.
Before Capps was taken to the holding center, the police advised her that Boyd had died at the hospital as a result of the injuries he had sustained that night, and that she was going to be arrested. Capps made statements informing police of the location of the knife used in the incident.
An autopsy revealed that Boyd died of a stab wound to the neck with loss of blood. He also sustained a number of superficial cuts on the face, shoulder and upper right arm.
Capps subsequently was indicted on one count of second degree (intentional) murder and fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon (a folding knife).
On February 8, 2006, the parties appeared before Erie County Court Judge Timothy J. Drury for a Wade/Huntley hearing. The prosecutor requested an adjournment to continue further plea discussions.
The parties returned to court on November 8, 2006. The prosecutor indicated that an offer to plead guilty to one count of first degree manslaughter had been extended to Capps. Noting that Capps, "ha[d] been somewhat helpful, at least through a family member, " at a recently concluded trial, Judge Drury stated that if Capps accepted the plea, he would cap the sentence at 14 or 15 years determinate, with 5 years of post-release supervision.
On November 29, 2006, the parties appeared before Judge Drury, and Capps entered a plea of guilty to one count of first degree manslaughter in full satisfaction of the indictment.
On February 21, 2007, Capps appeared for sentencing before Erie County Court Judge Sheila DiTullio.[1] In light of the sentence cap articulated by Judge Drury in November 2007, the prosecutor urged imposition of a 15-year determinate sentence, and defense counsel requested a sentence of 14 years. Judge DiTullio sentenced Capps to 15 years, determinate, plus 5 years of post-release supervision.
Through new counsel, Capps appealed her conviction to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, of New York State Supreme Court, arguing that her appellate rights waiver did not preclude her challenge to the severity of the sentence, and that the trial court should have afforded her youthful offender status. The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the conviction on June 5, 2009. People v. Capps, 63 A.D.3d 1632 (4th Dep't 2009). The Appellate Division held that Capps' appellate rights waiver was valid and encompassed her sentencing challenge as well as her contention that the County Court should have granted youthful offender status. In any event, the Appellate Division held, Capps failed to preserve the latter contention because she did not request youthful offender status during plea proceedings or at sentencing. The New York Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal. People v. Capps, 13 N.Y.3d 795 (2009).
On September 21, 2010, Capps filed the instant petition, asserting the following grounds for relief: (1) her appellate rights waiver was invalid and did not preclude her challenge to the harshness of her sentence; (2) her conviction was obtained by an unknowing, unlawful and involuntary guilty plea because the trial court should have afforded her youthful offender status; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to preserve issues for appeal.
On initial screening, and interpreting the petition's allegations to raise the strongest arguments they suggested, the Court (Siragusa, D.J.) determined that the petition appeared to contain one unexhausted claim, namely, that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to preserve the youthful offender status issue for appellate review. At Capps' request, the petition was stayed so that she could return to state court and exhaust her ineffective assistance claim.
Capps filed a motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law ("C.P.L.") § 440.10 in Erie County Court asserting that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek youthful offender status, which rendered the issue unreviewable on appeal; and that the trial court should have, on its own motion, granted youthful offender status to Capps at sentencing.
On December 31, 2013, Judge DiTullio issued a decision and order denying Capps' motion to vacate. Judge DiTullio found that counsel provided competent representation and successfully negotiated a plea agreement whereby Capps, facing a potential life sentence, was allowed to plead to a reduced charge and receive significantly less prison time. Furthermore, because she would not have granted youthful offender status given the facts and circumstances of Capps' crime, Judge DiTullio found that counsel was not ineffective for failing to make a motion with little to no chance of success. With regard to ground two of Capps' motion, Judge DiTullio found that she did not abuse her discretion in declining to consider youthful offender treatment.
In response to a February 28, 2014 request from this Court for a status update, the Erie County District Attorney's Office filed a letter on March 21, 2014, explaining that Capps attempted to file a motion for leave to appeal the denial of her C.P.L. § 440.10 motion with the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, on February 3, 2014. However, her papers were returned to her as improperly filed.
This Court's Pro Se Office contacted the Office of the Clerk of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department and was advised that Capps had made no attempts to re-file the motion for leave to appeal. As a result, an order was entered lifting the stay of this habeas proceeding. Capps has not requested further time to attempt to re-file her leave application or objected to the lifting of the stay.
Respondent filed an amended memorandum of law addressing Capps' ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. Capps did not file a reply brief.
For the reasons set forth below, the petition is dismissed.
III. Exhaustion
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), as amended, a court may not grant a petition for habeas corpus unless the petitioner has exhausted all state judicial remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A), (2). The exhaustion requirement "mandates that federal claims be presented to the highest court of the pertinent state before a federal court may consider the petition." Pesina v. Johnson, 913 F.2d 53, 54 (2d Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (citation omitted). Respondent argues that Petitioner's second and third claims are unexhausted.
With regard to Petitioner's second claim, that her plea was involuntary because the trial court did not afford her youthful offender status, Respondent notes that Petitioner failed to move to vacate her guilty plea before sentencing and failed to argue on direct appeal that her plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent. Petitioner did not seek a stay of the petition with regard to this claim, most likely because the judge who performed the initial screening did not notify Petitioner that the claim appeared to be unexhausted.
The Court agrees with Respondent that the claim was not raised in state court in any procedural vehicle. However, the claim does not remain unexhausted. Instead, it must be "deemed exhausted" because Petitioner no longer has "remedies available" in state court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Bossett v. Walker, 41 F.3d 825, 828 (2d Cir. 1994) (citations omitted). First, Capps has already completed her direct appeal. By statute, New York law used to provide for only a single application for direct review. Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Fac., 219 F.3d 162, 170 (2d Cir. 2000) (relying on former New York Rules for the Court of Appeals § 500.10(a) (discussing leave applications for criminal appeals)). Section 500.10 has since been amended, and criminal leave applications are now addressed in N.Y. R. Ct. § 500.20. Although Rule 500.20 "does not specifically state that there may be only one application for appeal, see N.Y. R. Ct. § 500.20, such a restriction may be inferred, " since "[b]oth Rule 500.20(d) and CPL § 460.10(5) provide a 30-day window for any such application to be filed; this time limit would be meaningless were multiple applications permitted." Colon v. Connell, No. 07 Civ. 7169(BSJ)(JCF), 2009 WL 2002036, at *6 n. 4 (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2009) (noting that both N.Y. R. Ct. § 500.20(d) and N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 460.10(5) provide a 30-day window for any such application to be filed; "this time limit would be meaningless were multiple applications permitted"); accord, e.g., Cunningham v. Conway, 717 F.Supp.2d 339, 365 (W.D.N.Y. 2010) (collecting cases). In addition, § 500.20(a)(2) provides that the leave letter must indicate that "that no application for the same relief has been addressed to a justice of the Appellate Division, as only one application is available[.]" N.Y. R. CT. § 500.20(a)(2).
Second, Capps cannot seek collateral review of her guilty plea claim. See N.Y. CRIM. PROC. LAW § 440.10(2)(c) (barring collateral review if claim could have been raised on direct review but was not). In this case, "sufficient facts appear on the record of the proceedings underlying the judgment" to have permitted Capps to raise the claim regarding the voluntariness of her guilty plea on direct appeal. See Bossett, 41 F.3d at 828.
Because it would be fruitless to require Capps to pursue this claim in state court, it is deemed exhausted. See id. However, these same procedural defaults prevent the Court from addressing the claim's merits unless Petitioner shows cause for the default and resultant prejudice, Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 749-50 (1991), or that a fundamental miscarriage of justice would occur if the the Court declines to consider the claim. See Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 496 (1986).
Capps has not attempted to show cause or prejudice, or a fundamental miscarriage of justice. Although Capps does make an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, it concerns only trial counsel, not appellate counsel. It thus does not explain her failure to raise the pertinent issue on appeal, and cannot provide "cause" for defaulting the claim. See Bossett, 41 F.3d at 829. Accordingly, Petitioner's claim regarding the voluntariness of her guilty plea is dismissed without reaching the merits.
With regard to Petitioner's third claim asserting trial counsel's ineffectiveness, Respondent argues that by failing to appeal the denial of her C.P.L. § 440.10 motion, Capps has not fulfilled the exhaustion requirement. See Pesina, 913 F.2d at 54 ("[B]y failing to appeal the denial of his Section 440.10 motion, [the petitioner] has not fulfilled this requirement with respect to his ineffective assistance claim."). Here, Capps did attempt to file an application to appeal but her papers were returned to her as "improperly filed". Respondent did not indicate why the Appellate Division found the papers to be improperly filed, and did not provide the Court with a copy of the Appellate Division's correspondence.
There is a 30-day time-limit for appealing denials of § 440.10 motions. See N.Y. CRIM. PROC. LAW § 460.10(4)(a) ("Within thirty days after service upon the defendant of a copy of the order sought to be appealed, the defendant must make application pursuant to section 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to the intermediate appellate court"). Based on the date of the C.P.L. § 440.10 decision (December 31, 2013) and the date of Capps' application for leave to appeal (February 3, 2014), [2] the Court surmises that the application was found to be "improperly filed" because it was untimely. However, the Court cannot say this for certain due to the incomplete record received from Respondent. Because the 30-day time-limit in C.P.L. § 460.10(4)(a) has long since passed, it seems that Capps would face a procedural bar if she were attempt to re-file her notice of appeal, and therefore that the claim should be deemed exhausted.
However, there is Second Circuit precedent that holds to the contrary. See Pesina, 913 F.2d at 54. In Pesina, the Second Circuit rejected the argument that because the statutory time limit for seeking leave to appeal the denial of a C.P.L. § 440.10 motion had passed, the petitioner had in fact exhausted the claims in that motion. The Second Circuit stated that regardless of how unlikely it was that the petitioner would have his ineffective assistance claim held to be procedurally barred by a state court, it had "no authority to declare as a matter of state law that an appeal from the denial of his original Section 440.10 motion is unavailable or that he cannot raise the ineffective assistance claim in a new Section 440.10 action." Pesina, 913 F.2d at 54. Thus, under Pesina, which has not been overruled or abrogated by the Second Circuit, the Court must treat the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim as unexhausted.[3] See Priester v. Senkowski, No. 01CIV.3441(LMM)(GWG), 2002 WL 1448303, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. July 3, 2002) (applying Pesina to similar situation, but noting that case has been undermined by later Supreme Court authority).
The habeas statute, as amended, now permits a district court to deny (but not grant) a petition containing unexhausted claims on the merits. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2). The statute does not articulate a standard for addressing such unexhausted claims, and neither the Supreme Court nor the Second Circuit has established one. Among the district courts in this Circuit, the various formulations share "the common thread of disposing of unexhausted claims that are unquestionably meritless." Keating v. N.Y., 708 F.Supp.2d 292, 299 n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Williams v. Artus, 691 F.Supp.2d 515, 526-27 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (relying upon § 2254(b)(2) where unexhausted claims were "plainly meritless"); Robinson v. Phillips, No. 04-CV-3446 (FB), 2009 WL 3459479, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct.23, 2009) (relying upon § 2254(b)(2) where unexhausted claims were "patently frivolous")). Here, as discussed further below, the unexhausted claim is plainly and unquestionably without merit. Therefore, the Court finds that it is appropriate to deny the entire petition on the merits under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2).[4]
IV. Discussion
A. Validity of Appellate Rights Waiver
Capps asserts that her waiver of appellate rights was invalid and insufficient to preclude review of her sentence as harsh and excessive. Petitioner has not cited, and the Court is not aware of, any federal precedent standing for the proposition that specific language must be used by the trial judge in apprising a defendant pleading guilty of the individual rights relinquished. Roland v. Rivera, No. 06-CV-6543(VEB)(DGL), 2011 WL 1343142, at *4 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2011) (rejecting as not cognizable petitioner's claim that the trial court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his understanding of the waiver of appellate rights) (citing Salaam v. Giambruno, 559 F.Supp.2d 292 (W.D.N.Y. 2008); Nicholas v. Smith, No. 02 CV 6411(ARR), 2007 WL 1213417, at *10-11 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2007)). The Court need not consider whether Petitioner has a viable federal constitutional claim regarding the alleged deficiency in her appellate rights waiver, because, as discussed below, her underlying sentencing claim is not cognizable on habeas review.
Here, Capps pleaded guilty to one count of first degree manslaughter, a class B violent felony which carried with it a potential maximum determinate sentence of 25 years plus a mandatory term of up to 5 years of post-release supervision. See N.Y. PENAL LAW § § 125.20(1), 70.02(3)(a). Petitioner was promised a sentence of either 14 or 15 years determinate, plus a 5-year term of post-release supervision. She ultimately was sentenced to a 15-year determinate term plus 5 years of post-release supervision. It is well settled that no federal constitutional issue cognizable on habeas review is presented where, as here, a habeas petitioner's sentence is within the statutorily prescribed range. White v. Keane, 969 F.2d 1381, 1383 (2d Cir. 1992) (citing Underwood v. Kelly, 692 F.Supp. 146 (E.D.N.Y. 1988), aff'd mem., 875 F.2d 857 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 837 (1989)).
B. Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel
Capps asserts, as she did in support of her C.P.L. § 440.10 motion, that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek youthful offender treatment at the plea proceeding or sentencing, thereby failing to preserve the issue for appellate review.
To demonstrate a violation of her Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel, a petitioner must show that her attorney's representation was deficient in light of prevailing professional norms and that prejudice inured to her as a result of that deficient performance. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To satisfy the first prong, counsel's conduct must have "so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process" that the process "cannot be relied on as having produced a just result[.]" Id. at 686. As to the second prong, the petitioner "must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional" conduct, the result of the trial would have been different. Id. at 694. "[T]here is no reason for a court deciding an ineffective assistance claim... to address both components of the inquiry if the defendant makes an insufficient showing on one.'" Greiner v. Wells, 417 F.3d 305, 319 (2d Cir. 2005) (alterations in original) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697).
Here, the Appellate Division's primary reason for not considering Petitioner's claim regarding youthful offender status was that such a contention was encompassed by her valid waiver of appellate rights, which had nothing to do with trial counsel's performance. The lack of preservation by trial counsel simply was an alternative basis for the Appellate Division to decline to consider the youthful offender status claim. Thus, Petitioner has not shown a reasonable probability that the outcome of her appeal would have been different but for trial counsel's error. As a result, she meet the prejudice prong of Strickland.
Moreover, Petitioner has not established Strickland's deficient performance prong. In denying the C.P.L. § 440.10 motion, Judge DiTullio stated that she would not have granted youthful offender treatment even had trial counsel made such a request. It is well-settled that the "[f]ailure to make a meritless argument does not amount to ineffective assistance." United States v. Arena, 180 F.3d 380, 396 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 811 (2000).
C. Failure to Grant Petitioner Youthful Offender Status
To the extent Petitioner's second ground for relief can be read to assert a stand-alone claim of error by the trial court in not according her youthful offender status sua sponte, such a claim is not cognizable on Federal habeas review. Under New York law, "[t]he decision whether to grant youthful offender status to an eligible youth generally lies within the sound discretion of the sentencing court.'" People v. Victor J., 283 A.D.2d 205, 206, 724 N.Y.S.2d 162 (1st Dep't 2001) (citation omitted). The Second Circuit has explained that "[t]he granting or denial of youthful offender treatment is analogous to that of sentencing where courts have wide discretion even though there are few or no statutory guidelines for the exercise of such discretion." United States ex rel. Frasier v. Casscles, 531 F.2d 645, 647 (2d Cir. 1976) (citations omitted). If the reviewing court determines that sentencing "judge has exercised has exercised [her] discretion within statutory limits, appellate review is at an end." Id. (citations omitted). As discussed above, Capps' sentence is well-within the statutorily permitted range. Therefore, her claim regarding the failure of the state court to accord her youthful offender status does not present a constitutional issue cognizable on federal habeas review. Accord Murphy v. Artus, 07 Civ. 9468, 2009 WL 855892, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2009) (citing Auyeung v. David, 00 Civ. 1353, 2000 WL 1877036, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2000) (citing Frasier, 531 F.2d at 647-48)).
V. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed above, the petition (Dkt. #1) is dismissed. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Petitioner must file any notice of appeal with the Clerk's Office, United States District Court, Western District of New York, within thirty (30) days of the date of judgment in this action.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us

subset: commoncrawl


text:
"This choice was perfect for me and my baby shower party favors. My order was deliveedr a day earlier than the suggested time, and the stickers were the perfect size and easy to remove from the backing and apply to the gift. I will definitely order other products! Thanks."
"Ordered for my daughter's first birthday's pretty in pink party. It is very dainty and elegant. Loved it! Quality is great as always."
"These stickers are very beautiful for a little girl. I use them as envelope seals for my daughter's stationery. The design is so pretty and the soft colors are perfect. They are a bit smaller than I thought they'd be but still a good size."
"I am really pleased with all products from Tiny Prints. These little tags are to be used on candy table bags and I am also making cupcake toppers wth them. I am using scrap paper and lollypop sticks to do the toppers. The size is perfect to get really creative for use etc. I am excited to carry the invite theme into the shower. Overall just impressed with entire order/experience. Customer service was wonderful, the sample products I tested were also great."
"Just the perfect size for my favor boxes! The design matches my baby shower invites, which I think is fabulous :)! Also got matching Thank You cards. I love Tiny Prints!"
Copyright © 2004-2016 Shutterfly, Inc | Tiny Prints | Terms of Use. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.


text: [ { "catentry_id" : "384979", "Attributes" : { "Colour_Clear":"1" }, "ItemImage" : "/wcsstore/StorefrontAssetStore/images/NoImageIcon.jpg", "ItemImage467" : "/wcsstore/StorefrontAssetStore/images/NoImageIcon.jpg", "ItemThumbnailImage" : "/wcsstore/StorefrontAssetStore/images/NoImageIcon.jpg" } ] Rustic Ramble Sweet Treats Jar £6.99 Qty (1) Qty (2) Qty (3) Qty (4) Qty (5) Qty (6) Qty (7) Qty (8) Qty (9) Qty (10) Qty (11) Qty (12) Qty (13) Qty (14) Qty (15) Qty (16) Qty (17) Qty (18) Qty (19) Qty (20) Add to basket × Your item has been added to basket Your items have been added to basket One line title Qty%(quantity)s %(price)s Continue Shopping Checkout Share Rustic Ramble Sweet Treats Jar Rustic Ramble Sweet Treats Jar is rated 5.0 out of 5 by 1. Rated 5 out of 5 by wilber from Have now bought six of these jars! I'm using these jars for my Tea, Coffee, Sugar, Rice, Flour etc and it works! They also look good sitting on my worktop and easy to see what's inside when I open my cupboard. Whilst I'm well chuff with these jars I did check every one before I purchased because very often the tops don't fit that well but for once it worked! Date published: 2015-06-01 y_2016, m_12, d_2, h_9 bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_0.0 cp_1, bvpage1 co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_1 loc_en_GB, sid_1000051719, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=AGE, direction=DESCENDING)] clientName_dunelm


text:
It is a one day tour that can suit you if you are in a hurry. We will pick you up from any of San Francisco hotels between 6:15 and 6:45. By getting onto the DIRECT motor coach which climbs the Sierras, we will arrive by 12:30 at the Yosemite. It is a 3 hours tour which will help you explore one of the most fantastic parks ever. In the Yosemite Park, you will enjoy some magnificent natural views, hear the sound of the water rushing down the falls, and see the mountains' peaks reaching the skies.
We will be in San Francisco around 8:00 PM.
Do not book any airline tickets until you receive your booking confirmation
Departure and Return Details
Departure Location
Pick up from almost any hotel in central San Francisco area between 6:15 and 6:45 depart by 7:00.
Return Location


text:
544 members296 Comments 4 Likes
1068 members2945 Comments 24 Likes
567 members712 Comments 54 Likes
729 members2511 Comments 27 Likes
525 members191 Comments 56 Likes
Kenny Thomas has not received any gifts yet
Posted on March 1, 2011 at 9:44am 0 Comments 0 Likes
I'm welcoming wholeheartedly the first day of March today (Malaysia Standard Time). I've set up some commitments for myself. They are yet to be documented on a hardcopy but nicely arranged in my own 'hard disk' aka my brain.
I want to be positive at all time but failed sometimes. And at those times that I'd succeed, I have my own tips (for myself) of how I should stay the same. I mean how to keep the positive energy and not slowing down at the same time. The energy covers all…Continue
Posted on September 14, 2009 at 9:03am 2 Comments 0 Likes


text:
U.S. Postal Service:
Mail Trends Highlight Need to Fundamentally Change Business Model
GAO-12-159SP: Published: Oct 14, 2011. Publicly Released: Oct 20, 2011.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
(202) 512-8509
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
By the end of fiscal year 2011, with a projected net loss of about $10 billion, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) was expected to become insolvent. To mitigate this, Congress temporarily deferred USPS's required $5.5 billion retiree health benefit payment. Over the previous 4 years, USPS experienced a cumulative net loss of just over $20 billion. USPS expects its revenue to decline further as First-Class Mail is projected to decline nearly 7 percent annually through 2020. Consequently, decisions need to be made to determine how USPS should be restructured to put it on a path to financial viability. GAO was asked to summarize (1) long-term trends related to the demand for and use of mail, and (2) options for restructuring USPS's business model to adjust to changing mail trends. This summary is based on GAO's past work, including GAO-11-278 (High-Risk Series: An Update) and GAO-10-455 (USPS: Strategies and Options to Facilitate Progress toward Financial Viability), both of which found that USPS urgently needs to restructure its networks and workforce to achieve and sustain financial viability. In addition, GAO also used data and related studies from USPS. GAO performed this work from September 2011 to October 2011 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. GAO provided a draft of this report to USPS for comment and incorporated technical comments provided by USPS as appropriate.
Long-term trends--highlighted in the data below--strongly suggest that the use of mail will continue to diminish as online communication and e-commerce expand. By 2020, USPS projects mail volume will decline to levels not seen since the 1980s: Total mail volume is projected to decrease by 25 percent, First-Class Mail is expected to decrease by 50 percent, and Standard Mail volume is projected to remain flat. While dire, USPS's projections could prove optimistic if communication continues to move to digital technologies as quickly as in the recent past. For the first time, in 2010, fewer than 50 percent of all bills were paid by mail. Almost 60 percent of mail received by households in 2010 was advertising, while bills and financial statements comprised 22 percent. These trends underscore the need for USPS's business model to undergo fundamental changes to reduce personnel and network-related costs. Restructuring USPS's business model to adapt to decreased mail use could follow one of three primary models: a government-subsidized federal agency, the current structure with additional flexibility, or a private-sector business.
Dec 8, 2016
Federal Building Management:Building Disposal Authorities Provide Varying Degrees of Flexibility and Opportunities for UseGAO-17-123: Published: Dec 8, 2016. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2016.
Dec 1, 2016
Enterprise Risk Management:Selected Agencies' Experiences Illustrate Good Practices in Managing RiskGAO-17-63: Published: Dec 1, 2016. Publicly Released: Dec 1, 2016.
Nov 28, 2016
Whistleblower Protection:Additional Actions Would Improve Recording and Reporting of Appeals DataGAO-17-110: Published: Nov 28, 2016. Publicly Released: Nov 28, 2016.
Oct 31, 2016
- Reported Inventory, Use, and Cost of Federally Owned AircraftGAO-17-73R: Published: Oct 31, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 31, 2016.
Oct 26, 2016
Federal Procurement:Smarter Buying Initiatives Can Achieve Additional Savings, but Improved Oversight and Accountability NeededGAO-17-164: Published: Oct 26, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 26, 2016.
Oct 13, 2016
Open Innovation:Practices to Engage Citizens and Effectively Implement Federal InitiativesGAO-17-14: Published: Oct 13, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 13, 2016.
Oct 12, 2016
U.S. Postal Service:Information on How Broadband Affects Postal Use and the Communications Options for Rural ResidentsGAO-16-811: Published: Sep 12, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 12, 2016.
Sep 30, 2016
Office of Personnel Management:Actions Are Needed to Help Ensure the Completeness of Political Conversion Data and Adherence to PolicyGAO-16-859: Published: Sep 30, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 30, 2016.
Sep 29, 2016
Federal Research Grants:Opportunities Remain for Agencies to Streamline Administrative RequirementsGAO-16-890T: Published: Sep 29, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 29, 2016.
Federal Workforce:Lessons Learned for Engaging Millennials and Other Age GroupsGAO-16-880T: Published: Sep 29, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 29, 2016.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here


text:
An independent Kurdish state would be cut off from the world, but the Kurds refuse to give up their national aspirations and are even enlisting Jewish aid. There is even talk of renewing Erbil's Jewish quarter.9 comments
Zvi Bar'el is the Middle Eastern affairs analyst for Haaretz Newspaper. He is a columnist and a member of the editorial board. Previously he has been the managing editor of the newspaper, the correspondent in Washington and has also covered the Occupied Territories.
Bar'el has been with Haaretz since 1982, and has written extensively on the Arab and Islamic world. In 2009, he was awarded the Sokolov prize for lifetime achievement in print journalism.
Bar'el has a Ph.D in the History of the Middle East. He teaches at Sapir Academic College and is a research fellow at the Truman Institute at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, as well as at the Center for Iranian Studies.


text:
You are using an
browser. Please
upgrade your browser
to improve your experience.
Sign in
Sign Up / Sign In
Sign Up
Explore Companies
Search Jobs
Get Advice
Meet Margarita
Meet Leah
Meet Sajid
Meet COPE Health Solutions'
Next Person
Healthcare | Client Services
Business & Strategy
Sajid Sindha
Vice President
As a VP at COPE Health Solutions, Sajid leads his team through project development, assists clients in overcoming challenges, and helps forge the strategic vision for the company.
Hear from Sajid
Blank Canvas
Sajid's Story
Wide Experience, Single Vision
Sajid studied Economics at UC Irvine, later obtaining his MBA from UCLA. He entered the consulting world via Accenture during the '90s tech boom, gaining deep insight into a diverse set of industries. After helping Kaiser Permanente implement its record system, Sajid saw an opportunity at COPE Health Solutions to truly disrupt and improve healthcare.
We're Hiring
Check out open jobs at COPE Health Solutions
What Sajid Does
Vice President
As a VP in a growth-stage startup, Sajid assists in crafting expansion strategies while influencing the long-term course of the company. In his day-to-day, Sajid works with clients to solve complex business problems in the healthcare sector. He recruits team members and guides them through project development, acting as a supportive foundation and driving force.
Passion for Healthcare
Want to learn more about working at COPE Health Solutions?
Connect with Sajid on LinkedIn
"From the very outset of when COPE Health Solutions was first formed, its mission has been based around helping and improving the lives of some of the most vulnerable segments of our country."
"COPE Health Solutions is a rocketship. We're going really far, really quickly. It's a fun, passion-driven culture."
More People
Margarita Gardea
Senior Consultant
Click to meet Margarita
Leah Rosengaus
Click to meet Leah
Sajid Sindha
Vice President
Click to meet Sajid