text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
January 12, 2012
BENJAMIN OSBORNE, GLORIA OSBORNE,PLAINTIFFS,v.PITE DUNCAN, LLP, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE [doc. #7]
Defendants Pite Duncan, LLP, Jason Short and Carla Stalcup*fn1
move to dismiss the above-captioned case under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and to strike the complaint under
California Code of Civil Procedure 425.16. Defendants also request an
award of attorneys' fees and costs if their special motion to strike
is granted.
Plaintiffs, who are represented by counsel, were required under the Civil Local Rules, to file an opposition to defendants' motion on or before July 11, 2011. See CIV. L.R. 7.1.e.2. But plaintiffs have not opposed the motion nor have they sought additional time in which to respond to the motion to dismiss or to strike the complaint.
Civil Local Rule 7.1.f.3.c provides that "[i]f an opposing party fails to file papers in the manner required by Local Rule 7.1.e.2, that failure may constitute a consent to the granting of that motion or other ruling by the court." When an opposing party receives notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b) and is given sufficient time to respond to a motion to dismiss, the Court may grant the motion based on failure to comply with a local rule. See generally Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 52 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal for failure to file timely opposition papers where plaintiff had notice of the motion and ample time to respond).
Here, plaintiffs were properly served with defendants' motion, which was filed on May 27, 2011, and therefore, they had six weeks to oppose the motion. Because the motion to dismiss and to strike the complaint is unopposed, and relying on Civil Local Rule 7.1(f.3.c), the Court deems plaintiffs' failure to oppose defendants' motion as consent to its granting.
Further, California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16(c), provides: "a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs." Under this provision, "any SLAPP defendant who brings a successful motion to strike is entitled to mandatory attorney fees." Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1131 (2001). But a defendant who brings a successful special motion to strike is entitled only to reasonable attorney's fees. The Court will permit the filing of a motion for attorneys' fees and cost.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED;
2. Defendants' special motion to strike the complaint is GRANTED; and
3. If defendants wish to file a motion for attorneys' fees and costs, they must do so within ten days of the filing of this Order. Defendants shall contact chambers in order to obtain a hearing date prior to the filing of their motion for attorneys' fees.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Luxury women's cashmere shawl from exclusive designer label Me and Kashmiere. The beautiful Me and Kashmiere scarf is super soft and can be worn in a range of ways. Featuring a unique printed portrait design whilst being hand made for a luxurious and individual finish.
- Shawl
- Graphic print design
- 100% cashmere
Please check the size guide for further information.
- Width measures 27 inch / 68.6cm
- Length measures 80 inch / 203.2cm
Please use the chart below to convert between standard size formats
* Me & Kashmiere scarves are all one size, please check an item's size & fit tab for specific measurements
If you require any additional help or information, please do not hesitate to contact our dedicated customer care team, Monday to Saturday 9:00am – 5:00pm (GMT).
Customer Services Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
UK Customer Services Telephone: 0845 835 2900
International Customer Services Telephone: +44 (0)191 211 2330
We also ship for delivery on Nominated day, Saturday and Sunday
To receive updates on products & offers please sign up to our newsletter.
For more detailed information please visit our dedicated Customer Service pages which can be found at the bottom of any page.
Online Enquiries
|UK Customers:
0845 835 2900
|International Customers:
+ (0)44 191 121 2330
Email us at firstname.lastname@example.com
Instore Enquiries
Please click here for contact details, directions & opening times
For news & exclusive offers, connect with Jules B via social media.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- From mobile
- Cam4
- Oct 05, 2015
- by anonymous
- #711224
Had several bans for innocent remarks and now suspended account.Should be pulled from the Internet.Add comment
I have been on cam4 for a year.I have moved from that site to CB.I am a broadcaster. I am not a gold member nor do I buy tokens they cost to much.The site is good But in the year I been there I got lurkers,guest, and some nut cases.No real viewers. So I went to CB I get alot of viewers but the support sucks I cannot get a respose on a problem. A viewer told me that they found my cam image on a paid site. I been trying to get to support on this... Read more ›
I have been banned Before long time ago after FEW MONTH i open again account on the site and i have been APPROVED BY #cam4 and today im banned again for the past mistake all what i want to know is: why #CAM4 accept me again like performer if was banned and why #CAM4 keep my money for THEYR mistake because THEY #CAM4 accept me again and let me work at site soo I just WANT my money and i don t wanna know anything THE STORY ON THIS SITE:( VERY... Read more ›
Hi. My email is firstname.lastname@example.com. ive send many complains and noone gotren back to me. My email is in used but i cant acces my name. My user name seems to be wrong. Need help. Read more ›
While it is not cam4's fault under age 18 and considered children are on that site posing as adults...Cam4 cannot help this, and should not have this available to under 18 year olds. They need to do something about this. While it is not their fault, this site needs to attempt to do more than writing a disclaimer. They need to find the children who are posing as adults who should not be on the sight. Read more ›
Should not have been on there...but underage children posing as adults saw nude video and pretended to be adults and totally harrassed, insulted, verbally abused, tried to slander and libel, stole the logo image and skype number, totally humilated and said the most hurtful dispicable things. It was very very very very upsetting the things they said...They were disturbed and they tried to disturb...Not cam4's fault...but bad!!!! So be very... Read more ›
I was scammed on cam4 by underage children. They verbally abused me and told me I was an old hag and should stay away from children. Accused me of being a "***" and said they were going to put my naked photos up on "***" sites...I told them this was Libel and slander...they called me a ***, said I was boring and had no personality...and other insulting things...mostly children under 18...I was so hurt and offended...the site cam4 only allows... Read more ›
I was scammed multiple times and even had proof I was scammed. I sent them an e-mail regarding having paid for the webcam service that they cam girl named her price. She ended the webcam after I paid her. I reported this to the website owners and provided screenshots showing she scammed me and others in the chat room. NEVER GOT A REFUND, NEVER GOT A RESPONSE. You take a gamble with your money if you choose to tip a girl. they dont care about... Read more ›
I know that this is will help nothing, I am just that pissed of this company. Since 3 years my studio registered lots of models on every big live cam site and erotic shops. Cam4 has the double payment as the others for perfomers (1tk=10c, only 5c from the other) so for that i tried to get also some Models to work for them. Now comes the moment where *** humans give even more *** machines the power over honest humans. Today was the 3rd time,... Read more ›
Had several bans for innocent remarks and now suspended account.Should be pulled from the Internet.Add comment
I understand there have been other entries about Chaturbate and Cam4 and the two together. I wanted to specifically deal with one issue regarding the sites. Chaturbate generally answers any and all issues via their support e-mail... Cam4 just about always doesn't go far enough, when most topics need more than a response. There are times there has to be a fair amount of back and forth to get answers or discussions completed. Cam4 also only deals... Read more ›


text:
Specialists in organising pilgrimages to the Holy Lands of Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Greece, Turkey, Italy and other amazing destinations of biblical interest.
Since 1967 we have been perfecting organising group tours and pilgrimages for churches and other organisations. All groups are suitable for Individual travellers too. if you cannot find the destination or departure date that suits you, please contact us, chances are that there is something in the pipeline.
To be notified when new groups are added please follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook.
"I would like to extend my gratitude for such a well organised trip with Reverend Maginey. Thanks to your staff for the wonderful arrangement and may God bless you for planning such life changing trips. Everything was well planned and organised."
Debra Nyamukure


text: I'm not liable if you mess your drive up! <<hey all...my buddy just picked up the sony DVP-S530D dvd player and was wondering how to access the firmware version, and what the latest firmware for this player is? Thanks Matt>> This question is asked so often that I have prepared a cut and paste answer for those who need this information. The answer to your question is in this Sony DVD player service menu briefing. Reportedly, firmware version 2.21 is the first version that fixes the lip-sync problem. Make sure that the DVD player is turned OFF and in the standby mode with the little red LED glowing above the on/off button. To enter the test mode, press Title, Clear, and Power on the remote. This will produce the following menu: Test Mode Menu 0. Syscon Diagnosis 1. Drive Auto Adjustment (Calibrates DVDs and CDs) 2. Drive Manual Operation (Calibrates DVDs and CDs) 3. Mecha Aging (Allows auto repeat mode for testing) 4. Emergency History (Shows the number of hours on your machine) ===>>> *** 5. Version Information (Shows FILMWARE version) *** <<<=== 6. Video Level Adjustment. (Test pattern) Exit: POWER Key. The Sony 330, 530 and 550 players have the ability to automatically calibrate the playback functions of DVDs and CDs. (This could conceivably save a trip to the repair facility for calibration.) If you are willing to accept any risks which may be involved in executing this procedure, the instructions follow. Before you start, have ready at least two dual layer DVDs and two single layer DVDs. (Dual layer DVDs have a gold color playing surface and single layer DVDs are silver.) You can also run the audio CD calibration if you want. The reason that I recommend having two of each type is that the player might produce an error message on one of the disks due to some miniscule imperfection and you will have another to fall back on. (It is unlikely that you will have a rare SACD disk so this part of the calibration procedure should be skipped.) Press #1 on the remote after entering the service menu and the following sub-menu will appear: ## Drive Auto Adjustment ## 0. All 1. DVD-SL (Single layer DVD) 2. CD (Audio CD) 3. DVD-DL (Dual layer DVD) 4. SACD (Super Audio CD) Exit: RETURN Press #1 on the remote and insert a Single Layer DVD when the drawer opens. Press the enter key and the machine will begin to calibrate all of the playback features. When calibration is completed, follow the onscreen instructions to return to the above menu. When the Drive Auto Adjustment menu returns, press #3 on the remote and insert a Dual Layer DVD when the drawer opens. Follow the instructions as noted above. When calibration is completed, follow the onscreen instructions to exit from the Test Mode. Now you can turn the player back on and try your dual layer disks and see if the layer change has improved. I calibrated my Sony 550 and it is working better than ever. If you are afraid to try this service mode calibration, leave it for an authorized service facility.


text:
Corel Painter 2017 v16.0.0 Multilingual (Mac OS X)
Corel Painter 2017 v16.0.0 Multilingual (Mac OS X)
Explore an impressive sensory selection of realistic Natural-Media® that perfectly emulates real life art materials and imaginative art materials that can't be found in the real world. With Painter® , you can experience the incomparable harmony of Audio Expression, smart photo cloning, killer composition tools, physics-inspired Particle brushes, and in-app learning—all in high DPI.
New Texture painting from source content
New Dab Stencils for precise paint application
New Glazing brushes for translucent paint transitions
New Interactive gradients with express painting
New Artist layouts with tools for each genre
Digital art & drawing software created by artists, for artists
Advance your digital art style with painted textures, subtle glazing brushwork, interactive gradients and realistic Natural-Media® in Painter® 2017. Easily transition from traditional to digital art with thick oils, dripping watercolors and many other texture-filled strokes. Explore workflow layouts like illustration, fine art, concept, manga and photo art with specialized tools for each style. Welcome to the world's most expressive digital art software that's changing what's possible in art.
The most natural transition from traditional to digital art
Immerse yourself in painting software that offers the largest selection of Natural-Media® brushes and canvas textures on the market. Craft your art with stunning reality using an array of authentic dry and wet media. When combined with a pressure sensitive drawing solution, you will forget you are painting on a computer.
21st Century media you won't find anywhere else
Create out-of-this-world art with Image Hoses that spray the object of your imagination. Liquid Ink that piles up and can be carved into. Particles that spring, flow and glow, and hyper-digital Pattern Pens that defy traditional art boundaries yet were brought to life by real artists.
Incomparable composition tools
Paint in perfect symmetry with Mirror and Kaleidoscope tools. Set a flawless scene with 1, 2 and 3-point Perspective Guides and craft the perfect composition using the Divine Proportion and Layout Grid tools built right into this stunning digital art software.
Home Page - http://www.painterartist.com/en/product/painter/
Buy a Premium Account = High speed+parallel downloads!


text:
Feiss P1330PN-LA Pave' Polished Nickel Mini Pendant
This item has been discontinued, however we may still be able to have it custom made. Prices on discontinued items are not guaranteed. Please call 877-237-9098 with inquiries.
Feiss P1330PN-LA Pave' Polished Nickel Mini Pendant
Model No.: P1330PN-LA
Number of Bulbs: 1
Bulb Included: Yes
Bulb Type: A19 Medium
Collection: Pave'
Bulb Wattage: 13W
Finish: Polished Nickel
Material: Steel
Height: 13.5"
Diameter: 5.5"
- Max Height: 58.8125"
data-bread-crumbs="" data-lang="en">


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
October 1, 1996
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (95cv01218)
Before: Ginsburg, Randolph, and Tatel, Circuit Judges.
Argued September 9, 1996
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Randolph.
The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting a formal investigation, begun in January 1994, to determine whether there have been violations of the federal securities laws. Witnesses have been interviewed, documents subpoenaed and testimony taken. Michael G. Swan, Teletek, Inc., and others are, as the Commission puts it, "involved." During the early stages of this ongoing inquiry, Herbert M. Jacobi, Esq., represented Swan and Teletek. After replacing Jacobi with other counsel, Swan and Teletek sent a Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. Section(s) 552) request to the Commission, asking for copies of all records relating to statements Jacobi had made to the Commission staff about them. When the Commission denied their request, Swan and Teletek sued in district court to compel production. Judge Robertson refused to permit them to conduct discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) and granted summary judgment in favor of the Commission.
The Commission's refusal to honor the FOIA request rested on exemption 7(A), 5 U.S.C. Section(s) 552(b)(7)(A), which excludes "records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes" to the extent that production "could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings." The declaration of an attorney in the Commission's Division of Enforcement explains why releasing these records might interfere with the investigation and any resulting enforcement proceeding. According to the declaration, Jacobi represented not only Swan and Teletek, but also six other people and entities in connection with this matter, and may himself have participated in the transactions under examination. The records encompassed within the FOIA request disclose the identities of witnesses, contain information obtained from sources other than Swan and Teletek, and reflect the Commission staff's selective recording of Jacobi's statements, revealing the scope and focus of the investigation. Producing these records would risk allowing those under Commission scrutiny to tailor their testimony, intimidate witnesses, manufacture favorable evidence, and conceal damaging evidence. On its face, the declaration seems to satisfy the burden exemption 7(A) imposes on the Commission. See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 239-42 (1978); Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. EPA, 856 F.2d 309, 310-13 (D.C. Cir. 1988); Willard v. IRS, 776 F.2d 100, 102-03 (4th Cir. 1985).
Rather than contesting the declaration directly, Swan and Teletek insist that these records are outside exemption 7(A) because they reflect statements of their attorney while he represented them. The idea is that information their attorney conveyed to the Commission must be treated as coming from them. How, then, can giving them information they provided "interfere" with the Commission's "enforcement proceedings"? Interference, they say, could result only if the requester would wind up learning something new.
Swan and Teletek's argument contains more than a few holes. They cannot know for certain what Jacobi said to the Commission, so it is hardly correct for them to say they are merely requesting information they already possess. Also, there is no reason to suppose that everything Jacobi said amounted to a representation on their behalf. Jacobi had other clients and he appears to have a personal stake in the Commission's inquiry. At any rate, the position Swan and Teletek advance embodies a mistaken legal theory.
FOIA does not make distinctions based on who is requesting the information. Records, if not exempt, must be made "promptly available to any person." 5 U.S.C. Section(s) 552(a)(3). Whether exemption 7(A) protects against disclosure to "any person" is a judgment to be made without regard to the particular requester's identity. "Except for cases in which the objection to disclosure is based on a claim of privilege and the person requesting disclosure is the party protected by the privilege, the identity of the requesting party has no bearing on the merits of his or her FOIA request." United States Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 771 (1989). We have cited Reporters Committee for "the principle of disregarding the identity of the requester" in FOIA cases. Schwaner v. Dep't of the Air Force, 898 F.2d 793, 798 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See also Reed v. NLRB, 927 F.2d 1249, 1252 (D.C. Cir. 1991); North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088, 1096-97 (D.C. Cir. 1989). Since the exemption the Commission invoked does not rest on a claim of privilege, the Reporters Committee principle dictates that the requesters' identities are of no significance. Whether exemption 7(A) applies depends instead on the character of the records and the interference with "enforcement proceedings" one could reasonably expect to result from releasing those records to anyone, not just to Swan and Teletek. It is therefore of no moment if the agency's records reflect statements of the requesters' attorney, of some other agent of the requesters, or of the requesters themselves.
The reasons for this are not far to seek. FOIA directs agencies to make information "available to the public." 5 U.S.C. Section(s) 552(a). Federal agencies receive hundreds of thousands of these requests each year. It would be an administrative nightmare if disclosure turned on who was making the request. For one thing, the agencies may not know who ultimately will receive the information. Attorneys and agents are in the business of filing FOIA requests for others. Once records are released, nothing in FOIA prevents the requester from disclosing the information to anyone else. The statute contains no provisions requiring confidentiality agreements or similar conditions.
Furthermore, agencies could hardly be expected to conduct investigations into the circumstances of individual requesters. Agencies, and hence courts, must evaluate the risk of disclosing records to some particular FOIA requester not simply in terms of what the requester might do with the information, but also in terms of what anyone else might do with it. Neither Campbell v. Department of Health & Human Services, 682 F.2d 256 (D.C. Cir. 1982), nor Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy, 617 F.2d 854 (D.C. Cir. 1980), stands for any different proposition, as Swan and Teletek contend. Both cases were decided before the Supreme Court's Reporters Committee decision set down the principle we have been discussing. Campbell and Coastal States Gas indicate that when records requested under FOIA contain only information already known to someone under government investigation, the government will often be unable to establish that exemption 7(A) applies. If the target of the investigation-the one who might use the information to intimidate witnesses, destroy evidence, and so forth-already has the information, public access to it is unlikely to interfere with law enforcement proceedings. Campbell and Coastal States Gas thus set forth the unremarkable proposition that in an exemption 7(A) case it may be relevant who the target of an investigation is and what the target knows. This is entirely consistent with the holdings in Reporters Committee and in our later decisions that the requester's identity is irrelevant.
As to Swan and Teletek, they are not the only ones caught up in the Commission's investigation. In determining whether releasing these records could, in exemption 7(A)'s terms, "reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings," the Commission therefore rightly evaluated the request on the basis that the information would become public and available to everyone, including others under Commission scrutiny. The Commission also had ample grounds for believing that Swan and Teletek themselves could have used the information to impede the investigation. One may suppose that some of Jacobi's statements originated with Swan and Teletek. During at least some of his encounters with the Commission, Jacobi acted as Swan and Teletek's attorney, and it is likely that some of his statements to the Commission involved repeating information he had learned from them. But this scarcely means that the Commission's records of even those statements contain nothing not already known to Swan and Teletek. The Commission's records reveal what the Commission staff thought important and worth recording and, by negative implication, what the staff thought unimportant. The records could reveal much about the focus and scope of the Commission's investigation, and are thus precisely the sort of information exemption 7(A) allows an agency to keep secret. Under similar circumstances, other courts have held that government records of a target's own statements, much less statements of the target's attorney, fall within exemption 7(A). See, e.g., Willard v. IRS, 776 F.2d 100, 102-03 (4th Cir. 1985); Linsteadt v. IRS, 729 F.2d 998, 1004-05 (5th Cir. 1984); see also Gould Inc. v. General Serv. Admin., 688 F. Supp. 689, 704 & n.37 (D.D.C. 1989).
All that remains is the objection of Swan and Teletek to the district court's denial of their discovery motion, filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f). This ruling, they say, prevented them from disputing material facts about the capacity in which Jacobi acted when he communicated with the Commission, about the sources of Jacobi's information, and about the Commission's "motive, intent, and purpose" in its dealings with Jacobi. See Plaintiffs' Statement of Facts as to Which There Are Genuine Issues, and Rule 56(f) Request for Relief at 1-2. For the reasons already given, we view it as immaterial whether Jacobi always acted as Swan and Teletek's attorney whenever he met the Commission's staff. The sources of Jacobi's information are also irrelevant. The harm in releasing this information flows mainly from the fact that it reflects the Commission staff's selective recording of Jacobi's statements and thereby reveals the scope and focus of the investigation. Even if Jacobi made all of his statements to the Commission in his capacity as Swan and Teletek's attorney, which seems quite implausible, and even if he merely relayed information provided to him by Swan and Teletek, which is just as unlikely, the Commission still has shown that the requested records fall within exemption 7(A)'s protection.
As to discovery into the Commission's "motive, intent, and purpose," Swan and Teletek charge that the Commission improperly allowed Jacobi to represent multiple parties and to act as an attorney for others while he himself was under investigation, and that a Commission attorney improperly interviewed Teletek's president when the company's attorneys were not present. We express no view about whether this alleged misconduct would have any impact on an enforcement action against Swan and Teletek. It is enough to say that the allegations are not material to the Commission's denial of their FOIA request. They have cast no doubt on the truth of the Commission's declaration. Nothing in the record suggests any dishonesty by the Commission or gives us any reason to suspect that the Commission is trying to conceal its own misconduct. Indeed, the Commission's declaration is the source of Swan and Teletek's evidence that Jacobi represented multiple parties and was himself under investigation. Including such information in a declaration submitted to a court is hardly consistent with a cover-up. No other misconduct, the details of which are unknown and possibly embarrassing to the Commission, is alleged. Swan and Teletek thus failed to demonstrate why they needed discovery to adduce, in the words of Rule 56(f), "facts essential to justify" their summary judgment opposition.
© 2002 VersusLaw Inc.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Angela DiCamino
48,498pages onAdd New Page
this wiki
this wiki
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Angela DiCamino was a cloned female Human from the planet Mariposa. She was a geneticist, and following the release of a genetically engineered pathogen in 2376, was considered one of the limited number of scientists capable of designing and creating the alleged bioweapon. (SCE eBook: Out of the Cocoon)


text: My wife and I ate here for lunch while doing a little shopping. The food was good but it was a bit pricey so we just rice and noodles and I also had sushi, which was also good. The downside was that our waiter wasn't overly friendly. He didn't come back much after we got our food and when he... More


text:
THIS IS A DIRECTORY PAGE. Britannica does not currently have an article on this topic.
Learn about this topic in these articles:
history of Aquileia
...adopting the title of patriarch in defiance of the Pope. The see remained schismatic when the patriarch Paolino I fled to Grado (the earlier foreport of Aquileia) after the Lombard invasion. When Candianus, who was loyal to Rome, was elected metropolitan at Grado in 607, the suffragan bishops of the Lombard mainland elected an abbot, John, at Aquileia, and he continued the schismatic policy...


text:
by Mandy
We decided to have a family day out in the big city! To do this we thought we'd catch the train and trams and visit the Rialto Observation Deck.
We really enjoyed it, the view was really good. The weather was a bit off that day but that did not deter us as the observation deck has a combination of indoor and outdoor viewing areas.
So anyway, we spent most of our time inside admiring the great view of our city and went out for a short time, simply because we were there, so how could we not.
It's a shame that it has closed, from what I remember it seems to have been around forever! And what about all those marathons up all those stairs????? Are they still going to do that?
Anyway, at least we can say that we've been there and done that. It's important to visit landmarks locally and not only when you are on holidays.
Thanks Mandy and I agree, it is a terrific thing to do with the kids...enjoying what your own city has to offer.
Why wait till the holidays I always say, when you can do the "touristy" thing any time.
I am glad you enjoyed yourselves.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Your Rialto Melbourne Experience.
DISCLAIMER: Family Getaways Melbourne makes no claim as to the accuracy of this information and takes no responsibility for incorrect or incomplete information or for actions based on the information in these pages, and accepts no liability to any person or organization for the information contained in these pages.


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
August 21, 2007
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,v.WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY MERGER TO FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT.
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company, ("Kodak") brought this action in New York State Supreme Court, Monroe County, seeking damages against defendant Wachovia Bank National Association, ("Wachovia") for Wachovia's alleged breach of contract, fraud, and tortious interference with contractual relations. By Notice dated August 21, 2002, Wachovia removed this action to federal court on grounds of diversity jurisdiction. Kodak subsequently moved to remand this action to State Court on grounds that both parties are New York citizens, and therefore, there is no diversity between the parties, which motion was denied on November 4, 2002. Thereafter, the parties agreed to stay the action pending completion of a separate bankruptcy action proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District Of Georgia, which action became final on December 11, 2006. Less than one month later, on January 8, 2007, Wachovia filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's Complaint which is now pending for determination by this court.
The following allegations are set forth in the plaintiff's Complaint. The instant dispute between Kodak and Wachovia arises from dealings that the parties had with each other, and with a third party, Wolf Camera, Inc. ("Wolf"). Wolf was a retailer of photographic equipment and film. Wolf sold and distributed significant amounts of Kodak film, and in 1992, Kodak entered into a supply and financing agreement with Wolf. Under the terms of the agreement, Kodak agreed to supply film to Wolf at a specified price for sale through Wolf's retail outlets, and Kodak agreed to lend money to Wolf to facilitate Wolf's expansion and penetration into both new and existing retail markets.
Wachovia, through its predecessor in interest First Union National Bank, was also a creditor of Wolf. As part of its relationship with Wolf, Kodak agreed to guarantee up to $3,000,000.00 of Wolf's debt to Wachovia, and further agreed to subordinate its own interest to Wachovia's.
In 1996, Wolf and Kodak amended their agreement, and Kodak agreed to loan Wolf an additional $8,000,000.00 and guaranty Wolf's debt to Wachovia up to $20,000,000.00, at Wolf's option. According to Kodak, the purpose of the additional loan money was to finance Wolf's expansion, which Kodak believed would enhance sales of its film and other products.
In 1998, Wachovia increased Wolf's revolving line of credit to $60,000,000.00, and Wolf, contemporaneously, exercised its option to have Kodak guaranty $20,000,000.00 of Wolf's debt to Wachovia. In September, 1998, Kodak financed Wolf's acquisition of Fox Photo, a chain of approximately 450 retail photographic stores. Concurrently, Wachovia, acting as a lender and as an agent for other lenders, committed to lend Wolf $100,000,000.00 on a revolving line of credit. Kodak, which also entered into an amended and restated loan agreement with Wolf, agreed to subordinate its right to receive payment on the debt owed by Wolf to Kodak to Wachovia's right to receive payment from Wolf on the debt Wolf owed to Wachovia. At the same time, Kodak, Wachovia and Wolf entered into an Intercreditor Agreement pursuant to which Kodak and Wachovia agreed to use their best efforts to provide each other with notice of actions that could "significantly affect the other Secured Creditor with regard to the ability of [Wolf] to meet its obligations to the Secured Creditor."
In July, 1999, Wolf's financial projections indicated that it would suffer a shortfall in earnings, and that as a result, it would need additional capital to remain in compliance with certain covenants made to Wachovia in its borrowing agreements with Wachovia. Wolf and Wachovia, with notice to and the consent of Kodak, agreed to temporarily allow Wolf to increase its borrowing ratios.
Thereafter, Kodak and Wolf entered into additional negotiations for the purpose of continuing Wolf's expansion. In February 2000, while still negotiating with Kodak, Wolf allegedly informed Wachovia (without also informing Kodak) that its earnings to debt ratio would violate its covenants to Wachovia, and that it would be suffering cash shortages. According to Kodak, on March 2, 2000, Wachovia, knowing that Wolf was negotiating a $30,000,000.00 loan from Kodak, amended its credit agreement with Wolf to allow Wolf to increase its borrowing ratios. Kodak contends that Wachovia failed to notify Kodak of its decision, and failed to obtain Kodak's consent to the increase in Wachovia's borrowing limits, in violation of the Intercreditor Agreement. According to Kodak, Wolf and Wachovia did not inform Kodak of Wolf's deteriorating financial position because it did not want that information to hinder Wolf's ability to get the loan.
In late March, 2000, Kodak and Wolf entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan and Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Kodak agreed to loan Wolf $30,000,000.00 on an interest-free basis. According to the terms of the agreement, the loan was to be used exclusively for new store development and upgrading of newly-acquired stores. Wachovia was aware of the loan negotiations between Kodak and Wolf, and draft loan documents were sent to Wachovia for comment and approval.
According to Kodak, at the same time it was negotiating the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Purchase Agreement with Wolf, Wachovia (without Kodak's knowledge) was demanding that Wolf sign an agreement under which it would pay to Wachovia all of the proceeds of the loan. Indeed, Wolf signed such an agreement on or about March 28, 2000. Kodak contends that Wachovia forced Wolf to sign the agreement despite knowing that its demand that Wolf pay the loan proceeds to Wachovia was in direct conflict with, and indeed would cause a breach of Wolf's obligation to use the loan proceeds to develop new retail locations. Upon Kodak's delivery of the $30,000,000.00 to Wolf, Wolf paid the money directly to Wachovia.
I. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for dismissal of the complaint where the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. When evaluating a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court must ascertain, after presuming all factual allegations in the pleading to be true and viewing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, whether or not the plaintiff has stated any valid ground for relief. Ferran v. Town of Nassau, 11 F.3rd 21, 22 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1014 (1994). The court may grant a Rule 12(b)(6) motion only where "`it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'" Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc., 945 F.2d 40, 44 (2d Cir. 1991) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957)).
Kodak alleges three causes of action in its Complaint. First, Kodak alleges that Wachovia breached a contract between the parties. Second, Kodak contends that Wachovia committed fraud in dealing with Kodak. Third, Kodak contends that the defendant engaged in tortious interference with contract. I discuss these claims seriatim.
II. Breach of Contract
"To establish a prima facie case for breach of contract, a plaintiff must plead and prove: (1) the existence of a contract; (2) a breach of that contract; and (3) damages resulting from the breach." National Market Share, Inc. v. Sterling Nat. Bank, 392 F.3d 520, 525 (2nd Cir. 2004).
In the instant case, Kodak has adequately alleged the elements of claim for breach of contract. Kodak has alleged the existence of a valid contract (the Intercreditor Agreement) between Kodak and Wachovia. Kodak has further alleged that Wachovia violated that contract by failing to comply with its contractual duty to use its "Best efforts" to inform Kodak of any actions that could have significantly affected Wolf's ability to meet its obligations to Kodak. Specifically, Kodak contends that Wachovia did not inform Kodak of its decision to temporarily waive Wolf's financial defaults to Wachovia, and its intention to require Wolf to pay $30,000,000.00 in loan funds received from Wolf directly to Wachovia. Such allegations sufficiently allege a breach of Wachovia's duty to inform Kodak of actions that could have affected Wolf's ability to satisfy its financial obligations to Kodak.
Finally, Kodak has sufficiently alleged that it was damaged as a result of Wachovia's alleged breach of the Intercreditor Agreement. Kodak alleges that because its $30,000,000.00 loan to Wolf was not used to develop retail outlets, but instead was used to pay off existing debt, Kodak suffered from the loss of the loan proceeds, and did not receive the benefit of new retail outlets for its products.
Wachovia contends that Kodak has failed to state a claim for breach of contract because the specific provision of the Intercreditor Agreement allegedly breached by it provides that neither party to the agreement shall be liable for a failure to notify absent a showing of bad faith, willful misconduct, or gross negligence, and that Kodak has failed to make such an allegation. The Complaint, however, at paragraph 99, clearly alleges that Wachovia "acted in bad faith, intentionally, willfully or in a grossly negligent manner." Assuming the allegations in the Complaint to be true, as the court must when considering a motion to dismiss, I find that Kodak has sufficiently alleged a breach by Wachovia of the Intercreditor Agreement. While Wachovia contends that Kodak's allegations are conclusory, and that its actions were not in bad faith but in fact justifiable, I find that under the rules of notice pleading, Kodak has sufficiently alleged bad faith intentional, or willful conduct. Whether or not Wachovia's actions were justified is, of course, a question not suitable for resolution on a motion to dismiss.
Wachovia next claims that Kodak fails to state a claim for breach of contract because a review of the pleadings reveals that Kodak, in fact, breached the Intercreditor agreement, and therefore may not maintain a breach of contract action against Wachovia. Because this court, at this early stage of the proceeding, cannot find that Kodak breached the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement as a matter of law, Wachovia's claim of Kodak's alleged breach of contract cannot negate any of the adequately-alleged elements of Kodak's prima facie claim of breach of contract.
Because I find that Kodak has sufficiently stated the elements of a valid claim for a breach of contract, I deny defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's contract claims.
III. Fraud
Kodak contends that Wachovia engaged in fraud by misrepresenting to Kodak that it consented to the provision of the loan agreement between Kodak and Wolf that required Wolf to spend the loan proceeds it received from Kodak to develop new retail outlets when in fact, Wachovia not only opposed that provision, but actually required Wolf to transfer those proceeds to Wachovia. Kodak also contends that Wachovia fraudulently failed to disclose its agreement with Wolf pursuant to which Wolf was required to pay its loan proceeds to Wachovia, failed to inform Kodak of Wolf's admissions regarding its inability to meet certain covenants made to Wachovia, and failed to inform Kodak of its decision to forgive or excuse Wolf's loan defaults.
To state a claim for fraud under New York law, the plaintiff must allege that "(1) the defendant made a material false representation, (2) the defendant intended to defraud the plaintiff thereby, (3) the plaintiff reasonably relied upon the representation, and (4) the plaintiff suffered damage as a result of such reliance." Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Recovery Credit Services, Inc., 98 F.3d 13, 19 (2nd Cir. 1996). See also S.Q.K.F.C., Inc. v. Bell Atlantic TriCon Leasing Corp., 84 F.3d 629, 633 (2nd Cir. 1996). To state a claim for fraudulent concealment of a fact under New York Law, the plaintiff must first allege the elements of a typical common-law fraud claim. Specifically, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant, with an intent to defraud, knowingly failed to disclose a material fact, that the plaintiff relied on the defendant's incomplete disclosure, and that the plaintiff was harmed as a result of the non-disclosure. Hughes v. BCI International Holdings, Inc., 452 F.Supp.2d 290, 302 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). Additionally, in cases where the alleged fraud resulted from the omission of information by a party, the plaintiff must establish that a duty to disclose such information arose as a result of a special relationship (such as a fiduciary relationship) between the parties, or that a duty to disclose arose as the result of the fact that the defendant possessed "superior knowledge not readily available to the plaintiff" or that the defendant knew that the "plaintiff was acting under a mistaken belief with respect to a material fact." Hughes, 452 F.Supp.2d at 303.
Wachovia moves to dismiss Kodak's fraud claims on grounds that the fraud claims are duplicative of the breach of contract claims, and therefore may not be allowed to proceed under New York law. Wachovia contends that the allegations of fraud all relate to duties that were owed under the contract, and that because the allegations amount to no more than an alleged breach of contract, Kodak's fraud claims should be dismissed.
While it is well established under New York law that a breach of contract will not ordinarily give rise to a tort claim, where the plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached a duty that was owed to the plaintiff independent of any duty owed under the terms of the contract, such a claim may be allowed to proceed under a theory of fraud. Agency Development, Inc. v. MedAmerica Ins. Co. of New York, 327 F.Supp.2d 199, 206 (W.D.N.Y., 2004)(Larimer, J.)("a simple breach of contract may not be transformed into a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated.")(quoting Fleet Bank of New York v. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp., 229 A.D.2d 962, 962, 645 N.Y.S.2d 384 (4th Dep't 1996). Moreover, a fraud claim may pursued simultaneously with a contract claim where the plaintiff can demonstrate that the defendant made "a fraudulent misrepresentation collateral or extraneous to the contract" or where the plaintiff seeks "special damages that are caused by the misrepresentation and unrecoverable as contract damages." Solutia Inc. v. FMC Corporation, 385 F.Supp.2d 324, 342 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)(quoting Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 98 F.3d at 20 (2nd Cir. 1996).
New York law explicitly recognizes three situations in which a party "has an independent duty to be truthful" to another party. Concorde Financial Corp v. Value line, Inc., 2004 WL 1687205, *6 (S.D.N.Y. July 28, 2004). First, "where the party has made a partial or ambiguous statement" the party is obligated to make a complete disclosure of the truth on grounds that "once a party has undertaken to mention a relevant fact to the other party, it cannot give only half of the truth . . . ." Concorde Financial, 2004 WL 1687205 at *6 (quoting Tomoka Re Holdings, Inc. v. Loughlin, 2004 WL 1118178 at *5 (S.D.N.Y. May 19, 2004). Second, a party may be obligated to disclose relevant information to another party where there exists a fiduciary or confidential relationship. Id. Finally, a party may be obligated to disclose relevant facts "where one party possesses superior knowledge, not readily available to the other, and knows that the other is acting on the basis of mistaken knowledge." Id.
In the instant case, Kodak has alleged that Wachovia had a legal duty to disclose information about Wolf and Wolf's interactions with Wachovia that arose separately from the duties mandated by the Intercreditor Agreement, and therefore, has stated a cause of action for fraud. First, Kodak alleges that Wachovia had a legal duty to disclose that it would require Wolf to pay the proceeds from the Kodak loan to Wachovia because Wachovia was aware that Kodak was making the loan under the assumption and explicit understanding that Wolf would spend the loan proceeds to expand its business. Kodak contends that because Wachovia reviewed the loan agreement between Kodak and Wolf, objected to portions of it, but did not object to the provision regarding use of proceeds, Wachovia knowingly and fraudulently, by omission, misrepresented to Kodak that it did not object to the requirement that Wolf spend the money on expanding its business, when in fact, it did object to that provision, and indeed, allegedly forced Wolf to agree to transfer the loan proceeds directly to Wachovia. Additionally, Kodak contends that Wachovia knew that Kodak was operating under a misapprehension that the loan proceeds would be used by Wolf to expand its business because Wachovia knew that Kodak was unaware of the agreement between Wolf and Wachovia which required Wachovia to use the loan proceeds to pay down old debt to Wachovia. Kodak has alleged that Wachovia knowingly made these representations with an intent to defraud Kodak of the loan proceeds it paid to Wolf, and that Kodak relied on the Wachovia's fraudulent ascent to the Kodak/Wolf loan agreement to its detriment. Accordingly, Kodak has sufficiently alleged the elements of a claim for fraud.
While it may be true that the actual duty imposed on Wachovia in tort (the duty to disclose relevant information) is identical to the duty imposed on it under the Intercreditor Agreement, the fact that the duties are the same does not foreclose plaintiff's right to pursue its claims under both tort and contract theories. Because the duties arise from different legal obligations, Kodak may pursue its claims under each legal theory. See Solutia Inc. v. FMC Corporation, 385 F.Supp.2d at 342 (holding that a "misrepresentation concerning present facts states an independent claim of fraud even when the contract expressly warrants the accuracy of the defendant's representations.") (emphasis added). Because Kodak has sufficiently alleged the elements of a claim for breach of contract and an independent claim of fraud, I deny Wachovia's motion to dismiss those claims.
IV. Interference with Contractual Relations
Kodak contends that Wachovia interfered with Kodak's contractual relations with Wolf by procuring Wolf's breach of the agreement under which Kodak agreed to lend $30,000,000.00 to Wolf.
"Under New York law, the elements of tortious interference with contract are (1) 'the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party'; (2) the 'defendant's knowledge of the contract'; (3) the 'defendant's intentional procurement of the third-party's breach of the contract without justification'; (4) 'actual breach of the contract'; and (5) 'damages resulting therefrom.'" Kirch v. Liberty Media Corp, 449 F.3d 388, 401 (2nd Cir. 2006)(quoting Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc., 88 N.Y.2d 413, 424, (1996)); . NBT Bancorp Inc. v. Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc., 87 N.Y.2d 614, 620-21 (1996).
In the instant case, Kodak has satisfied its pleading requirement. First, Kodak has alleged the existence of a contract between itself and Wolf. Second, Kodak has alleged that Wachovia knew of the contract, and indeed, had copies of the contract and drafts of the contract. Third, Kodak has alleged that Wachovia, without justification, intentionally procured Wolf's breach of its agreement with Kodak by requiring that Wolf use the loan proceeds from Kodak to pay-down debt to Wachovia, in violation of requirement that Wolf use the money to expand its business. Fourth, Kodak has alleged that Wolf did in fact breach its agreement with Kodak by using the loan proceeds to pay down debt rather than expand its business. Finally, Kodak has alleged damages resulting from the breach of contract that was allegedly procured by Wachovia.
Wachovia contends that Kodak has failed to state a claim for interference with contractual relations because Wolf could have re-borrowed the $30,000,000.00 it paid to Wachovia from Wachovia, and thus would have had $30,000,000.00 to expand its business. Aside from the fact that this contention raises a myriad of factual issues that are not suitable for consideration on a motion for summary judgment, the claim is inapposite with respect to Kodak's prima facie case. Whether or not Wolf had access to some other source of funding to obtain an equal amount of money it received from Kodak is immaterial to the issue of whether or not Wachovia induced Wolf to breach Wolf's agreement with Kodak, and whether or not Wolf breached the contract.
Wachovia further argues that it was justified as a matter of law in requiring that Wolf pay the $30,000,000.00 it received from Kodak to Wachovia, and therefore Kodak has failed to sufficiently allege that Wachovia procured Wolf's alleged breach of contract without justification. Whether or not Wachovia's actions were justified, however, is not a question that can be resolved in considering a motion to dismiss, where the well-pleaded allegations of the Complaint are accepted as true. Accordingly, because Kodak has sufficiently stated a claim for interference with contractual relations, I deny defendant's motion to dismiss that claim.
For the reasons set forth above, I deny defendant's motion to dismiss.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text: Minnie Mouse and her friends Daisy, Fifi and Figaro are ready to surprise Baby with pop-up action and sweet music. Toggling the bone, turning the flower, sliding the bow and pressing the heart all help Baby develop fine motor skills—and reward your little one with a pop-up character and a pretty little ditty! The music and pop-up action help stimulate Baby's developing senses—and teach how actions make things happen! There's even a handle for easy, on-the-go play!


text: Nailbanger Here Again: We went down to Lincoln City for the Day and decided to give HWY 101 Burger a Shot. What great little place for lunch, Basically Burger on the Menu. buy how ever many Patties and Slices of Cheese you want, Lettuce Tomato and Grilled or raw Onion. Special Sauce is Thousand Island, and nothing but double fried... More


text:
Reviews for No 26DAddress: 26D Cyril Jayasundara Mawatha (Lane), Kandy, Sri Lanka
Rooms from: US$ 17.65
Ratings Explained
(Hostelworld.com and Affiliate sites)
The following reviews were submitted by customers who booked through our sister site, Hostelworld.com, in the last 12 months.
The ratings in the rating box are based on all-time feedback for the property and are the opinions of the customers who submitted them; they do not express the opinions of Hostelworld.com or our affiliate sites.
Overall Rating (49 Ratings)
Customer Reviews for No 26D
dklieg3238, from USA ~ 17th Feb 2016
marieisintheair7222, from Sweden ~ 12th Feb 2016
alensevsek2988, from Netherlands ~ 21st Feb 2016
adieste4499, from Germany ~ 31st Jan 2016
jennikluoto3377, from Finland ~ 16th Feb 2016
tinakreitmayr8599, from Germany ~ 26th Jan 2016
isabeldanioth2656, from Switzerland ~ 17th Jan 2016
kylieskyesullivan9049, from England ~ 11th Jan 2016
olliecrush3581, from New Zealand ~ 30th Dec 2015
funnellsophie1580, from England ~ 29th Dec 2015


text: We already know that Capricorn natives are serious, hardworking and usually good at business, but in 2016 Neptune will be in their house of welfare all the time, which could make Capricorn natives be less realistic about the financial aspect. Neptune's transit doesn't have destructive effects, but predisposes to daydreaming, to art and spirituality, to introversion - and this attitude is not recommendable in business or money administration. You could get the impression that nothing is right anymore. The same prudence is recommended when Mercury is retrograde (in the former half of January, the former half of May 2016 and the former half of October), when more caution is required in business, as well as small and well considered steps.2016 Career HoroscopeAriesTaurusGeminiCancerLeoVirgoLibraScorpioSagittariusCapricornAquariusPisces


text:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Checks for errors in the source code
Pylint has a static analysis tool integrated which checks the source code for any potential errors and bugs.
Pro Built-in debugger
Wing IDE provides local and remote debugging.
Price is starting from $45 per user for the most basic configuration


text:
THIS IS A DIRECTORY PAGE. Britannica does not currently have an article on this topic.
Learn about this topic in these articles:
...most important of which is the Karṇa. Although generally of the 11th century, they are quite simple, lacking the rich sculptural decoration so characteristic of the period. By contrast, the Virāṭeśvara temple at Sohāgpur, with an unusually tall and narrow śekharī spire, is covered with sculptural ornamentation as rich as that of...


text:
Tullow Oil (TUWLF) Receives Average Rating of "Hold" from Analysts
Shares of Tullow Oil (OTCMKTS:TUWLF) have earned a consensus rating of "Hold" from the eleven analysts that are presently covering the stock. Three analysts have rated the stock with a sell recommendation, two have issued a hold recommendation and six have issued a buy recommendation on the company.
Several brokerages have issued reports on TUWLF. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. upgraded Tullow Oil from a "neutral" rating to a "buy" rating in a research note on Friday, July 8th. Morgan Stanley upgraded Tullow Oil from an "equal weight" rating to an "overweight" rating in a research note on Thursday. Finally, Cantor Fitzgerald cut Tullow Oil from a "hold" rating to a "sell" rating in a research note on Thursday, June 30th.
Shares of Tullow Oil (OTCMKTS:TUWLF) opened at 3.16 on Friday. The firm has a 50-day moving average price of $3.05 and a 200 day moving average price of $3.16. The stock's market capitalization is $2.88 billion. Tullow Oil has a one year low of $1.72 and a one year high of $4.29.
About Tullow Oil
Receive News & Stock Ratings for Tullow Oil Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Tullow Oil and related stocks with our FREE daily email newsletter.


text:
This May, Mark Turgeon was sitting at a recruiting event with Pittsburgh Coach Jamie Dixon when the conversation turned to the ACC/Big Ten Challenge. The Maryland men's basketball team crushed Northwestern on the road last season during the annual event, so Turgeon fully expected a home game this time around.
Terps, Mark Turgeon See Opportunity vs. Ohio State in ACC/Big Ten Challenge
From WashingtonPost.com
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse more stories
Mitch Stringer-USA TODAY Sports


text:
Used Pickup - 2015 Ford F-350 Super Duty DRW in Nanuet, Ny
*Preferred Equipment Package 620A**6.2L EFI V8 Engine**6-Speed Automatic Transmission**3.73 Ratio Regular Axle**Electronic Shift on the Fly**Engine Block Heater**Snow Plow Package**Upfitter Switches**Locking Removable Tailgate**Roof Clearance Lights**Air Conditioning**AM/FM Stereo w/Clock**Tilt/Telescoping Steering Wheel**Manual Windows/Locks**Manual Telescoping Trailer Tow Mirrors, Manual Glass**Trailer Tow Package**Trailer Sway Control**Trailer Brake Controller**4 Wheel ABS**MyKey**Securilock Passive Anti Theft**SOS Post Crash Alert System**************************************
- Four Wheel Drive
- Tow Hitch
- Power Steering
- Abs
- 4-wheel Disc Brakes
- Brake Assist
- Dual Rear Wheels
- Steel Wheels
- Tires - Front All-season
- Tires - Rear All-season
- Conventional Spare Tire
- Tow Hooks
- Intermittent Wipers
- Variable Speed Intermittent Wipers
- Running Boards/side Steps
- Am/fm Stereo
- Driver Adjustable Lumbar
- Adjustable Steering Wheel
- A/c
- Vinyl Seats
- Split Bench Seat
- Passenger Vanity Mirror
- Engine Immobilizer
- Traction Control
- Front Side Air Bag
- Driver Air Bag
- Passenger Air Bag
- Passenger Air Bag On/off Switch
- Front Head Air Bag
Major Accidents, Lemon History and Odometer Problems
» View The FREE CARFAX History Report
Visit our website or call us at 845-652-5134 for more financing information. Get Pre-Approved Auto Financing today! Apply here or click the link below to use our free, secure credit app.
2015 Ford F-350 ReviewThis car review is specific to this model, not the actual vehicle for sale.
The F-350 is Ford's Super Duty full-sized single rear-wheel (SRW) or dual rear-wheel (DRW) truck. The F-350 manages to mix innovation, comfort, and style into a competitive vehicle that has impressive torque ratings, towing capacities, and payloads. The F-350 is available as a 4x2 or a 4x4, has three different cab configurations, and has three trims available. The rugged and reliable XL, the well equipped XLT, and the luxurious Lariat. Two engine choices include a standard 6.2-liter 385-hp Triton V8 with 405 lb.-ft. of torque or the optional and innovative 6.7-liter turbo 400-hp V8 Powerstroke diesel with 800 lb.-ft. of torque. Both engines are mated to a new TorqShift six-speed automatic transmission with SelectShift and a Tow/Haul mode. The F-350 offers standard amenities such as traction control and electronic stability control (SRW only), a hill launch assist feature, side curtain airbags, a tilt and telescoping steering wheel and trailer sway control. Available features include a supplemental cab heater, a reverse camera system, upfitter switches, a navigation system, a remote start system, satellite radio and a rear folding tailgate step. Also, the unique Ford Work Solution options provide innovative solutions for trucks used in the work place. For 2015, the Ford F-350 is carried over with some exterior paint changes and minimal changes to some packages. In addition, the XLT trim now comes standard with satellite radio and 18-inch wheels and tires on the SRW models.
80 Route 304
Nanuet, Ny. 10954
Email This Seller
More Ford F-350's On The Lot
2016 Ford F-350 Super Duty Drw
Mileage: 3
Price: Call For Price
2016 Ford F-350 Super Duty Drw
Mileage: 3
Price: Call For Price
2016 Ford F-350 Super Duty Drw
Mileage: 4
Price: Call For Price
2016 Ford F-350 Super Duty Drw
Mileage: 3
Price: Call For Price
2016 Ford F-350 Super Duty Srw
Mileage: 25
Price: Call For Price
More Cars From This Seller
2017 Ford Transit Connect Van XL
Mileage: 4
Price: Call For Price
2017 Ford Transit Van
Mileage: 12
Price: Call For Price
2016 Ford Transit Connect XL
Price: Call For Price
2014 Lincoln MKZ
Mileage: 14,531
Price: $27,386
2017 Ford Edge SEL
Mileage: 2
Price: Call For Price
2017 Ford Edge SEL
Mileage: 2
Price: Call For Price
2017 Ford F-150
Mileage: 38
Price: Call For Price
2017 Ford F-150 XLT
Mileage: 10
Price: Call For Price
2017 Ford Transit Van
Mileage: 58
Price: Call For Price
2017 Ford Explorer Sport
Mileage: 3
Price: Call For Price


text:
Carolina Cooker® Lid Lifter for Dutch Ovens
Use this lid lifter to remove the lids from camping dutch ovens once you have started cooking and the dutch oven is hot. Measuring 17 in. long, this Carolina Cooker® lid lifter is long enough to safely reach for a hot lid.
Designed with a comfortable spiral handle, this lid lifter works especially well for dutch oven cooking. The lid lifter is 17 in. long and has a hook on the end for attaching to dutch oven lids. The end also has a constructed stabilizer bar for removing the lid securely without swinging or twisting.Specifications
- Carolina Cooker® Lid Lifter for Dutch Ovens
- Length: 17 in.
- Handle with hooked end to remove hot lids
- 4 in. stabilizing bar at the hook end
- Spiral grip for comfort
- Safely remove hot lids
Need to get your old cast iron clean? Click here to see how from Taste of the South.
Brand: Carolina Cooker
Shipping Information
Your order is important to us and we will strive to process it as quickly as possible. Most in-stock items are shipped within 2-4 business days and typically deliver in 5-7 business days. In-stock items may ship from multiple locations and can arrive on separate days. Heavy or bulky items will ship via Freight/Truck Service and will take 8-10 business days for delivery. For those immediate product needs, we do offer at an additional cost, express service from UPS and Motor freight.
Shipping costs are determined by item weight and your zipcode. Once you have entered your shipping address, city, state, and zip code into checkout, your shipping total will be calculated and available for review. Please see the shipping map below as a guide.
Return Information
Your satisfaction is our priority. If for any reason you are not satisfied with a purchase from Agri Supply, we will gladly refund your money, or exchange the item, or fix it should it break. A minimum one-year warranty applies to all non-perishable items, parts and service from Agri Supply, and all hand tools sold by Agri Supply have a lifetime warranty, regardless of the length of the manufacturer's warranty. See our Agri Supply Guarantee for more details.
To return an item... give us a call at 1-800-345-0169, or visit one of our 8 retail stores near you, and one of our friendly customer service representatives, or store employees, will be glad to assist you.
Standard UPS Ground Shipping Map -
The above shipping chart applies to UPS ground shipments to the 48 contiguous states only. Please call 1-800-345-0169 for timing on shipments to Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, thank you!
Review Summary
- Overall Rating: None
- Be the first to review this product
Customer Reviews
No Reviews
May We Suggest
- Add to Cart More Stew Pots More Cast Iron & Cooking Supplies More Carolina Cooker ® More Information
Carolina Cooker® Outdoor Cooking Tripod, 48 In.#53290
- Add to Cart More Dutch Ovens More Cast Iron Cookware More Dutch Ovens and Enamelware More Cast Iron & Cooking Supplies More Information
Carolina Cooker® 16 Quart Cast Iron Dutch Oven, Preseasoned#68859
- Add to Cart More Cooker Accessories More Cooking Accessories More Stew Pots More Cookers Parts & Acc. More Cast Iron & Cooking Supplies More Information
Lifting Hooks for Carolina Cooker®, 2 Pc.#66581


text:
My daughter and this little kitten were playing cat and mouse all day. My little girl could not figure out why her pants kept falling down. She would stand around swinging her arms, and the kitten would sneak up to attack her pants.
By Shannon
Oh how adorable, such memories.
Too cute! Kids and kittens (or puppies) just go together. :D
Thanks guys for the feedback! I love catching those precious (funny) life moments!
Too cute! We too, have a sneaky kitty who pulls my grand daughters hair!
Such an adorable picture!
Add your voice! Click below to comment. ThriftyFun is powered by your wisdom!


text:
Are your kitchen counters worn, tired and outdated? Are you embarrassed by them when anyone steps foot into this room? Your kitchen is the main point of convergence where you spend much of your time with family and friends. It is here that you gather for that special holiday get-together, converse over a cup of coffee, or eat meals . The counters usually are the first thing anyone sees upon entering. By resurfacing kitchen counters, you can give this most valuable room in your home a whole new face-life or add life to the look you already have.
There are many different textures and colors to choose from. Whatever your personal style or taste is, you're sure to find what you're looking for. Enhance the Look of Your kitchen with a natural stone accent. Bring an inviting warmth with the butcher-block look. Give it shine and sparkle with Granite, or formica. You can work with the look you already have, or create that unique look you've been dreaming about.
The task of resurfacing can take considerably a lot less time to finish than a full remodeling job. You won't have to move your sink or stove. Nor will you have to tear out any walls, therefore no plastering or repainting is necessary. Clean-up is much easier and faster. Remodeling could take up to six, long weeks, while resurfacing can be done in 24 to 36 hours. Your kitchen will be functional in no time.
Consequently, resurfacing kitchen counters can bring a Great Return on Investment that can be seen almost immediately. The resale value of your home increases. The life of your counters is renewed with ten or fifteen more years of enjoyment. With this in mind, you can have more confidence when you invite family and friends over for those special holiday meals or gatherings. No longer will you be embarrassed by an outdated kitchen.


text: Home Gallery Video Google We're All Storytellers Pixar's Andrew Stanton Talks About Storytelling in Inspiring Google Spot Google Turns TED Talk into Oscars Ad Published on Mar 04, 2014 Editor's Pick Storytelling was celebrated in the most inspiring way possible Sunday night, right at the end of the Oscars telecast on ABC. It came in the form of Google's one-minute spot voiced by Andrew Stanton, the man behind "Wall-E," "Finding Nemo," and "Monsters, Inc." The voiceover came from parts of Mr. Stanton TED talk from 2012, which was titled the "Clues to a Great Story." Rate this Ad You must be registered to rate the ad. Please Login or Register Now About CreditsDateMar 04, 2014Client:Google TagsAcademy Awards 2014 CategoryTVC Latest Creativity News on Ad Age Taco Bell Imagines a World Ruled by VR in Latest Ad Aaron Rodgers Gives a Pep Talk With a Twist in State Farm Spot 'Free the Bid' Initiative Calls for Ad Industry to Support Female Directors Advertisement Ad Age Events Nov 02 Los Angeles, CA SummitAd Age Brand Summit The Ad Age Brand Summit in Los Angeles peels apart the layers of brand building with a carefully crafted roster of top marketing, technology, and creative leaders. Learn more Related work Google: Explore the National Parks Stinkdigital Google: Google Photos Automatic Backup Google: #EveryoneSpeaksFood - a Google Translate Pop-Up Restaurant Want to see your work in our gallery? Submit now


text:
25% off iPhone and Samsung cases. Gift original. Use code SWEETGIFT
A spiral staircase in the Yale School of Art reminiscent of a golden ratio spiral. Yale's architecture is enough to keep any photographer busy for years.
Check out PolarityPhoto.com to see more of my work!
architecture yale
fractal case…. great shot!!!!
this is great. i love architectural photography when it's done this well :)
Very nice.
Wonderful angel…. love the light peeking through at the top… the lighting is superb. Well done
This is by far my favorite of your shots. I keep coming back to it and you have this perspective that is like a climb to heaven. It gets me every time I look at it.
fantastic shot,,, well done
gorgeous shot
Nice shot
Loading more work by PolarityPhoto...
10% off
for joining the Redbubble mailing list
Receive exclusive deals and awesome artist news and content right to your inbox.
Free for your convenience.


text:
Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Bereavement Support Groups
Primary kind of group
The primary group that will be established for bereavement will be a mutual support group, comprised predominately of individuals aged 60+ years that have been recently widowed, defined as individuals who have lost their spouse within the 1 year prior to seeking counseling.
Important to note is the fact that a majority of the elderly dies within nursing homes and medical centers; this fact may directly impact the experience of bereavement that individuals involved experience. According to studies, mortality rates increase as income rates and minority status decrease (Pappas, 1993). Therefore one might expect a larger population of elderly minority victims seeking a mental support relationship within a group setting.
Grief over the death of a loved one presents one of the most frequent and challenging problems mental health counselors face with their clients" (Muller, 2003). Death of a loved one is one of the most "penetrating loss individuals experience" encompassing a physical, emotional and spiritual loss process (Muller 2003 & James and Friedmans, 1998). The mutual support group will bring together individuals of similar backgrounds, economic status and situation to share experiences related to their loss. Important to note is the following statistic: Typically the "wife, husband and daughter (s) of deceased are most attentive at the deathbed, and presumably suffer the most from death." Therefore one might logically conclude that the mutual support group will consist of close family members, including wives, husbands and daughters.
Purpose of group and expected outcomes
Purpose of the group is to reduce the likelihood that individuals aged 60+ currently experiencing loss of a spouse or close family member will fall victim to depression.
A majority of elderly victims of loss witness the loss of a loved one in a controlled environment, such as a hospital or medial facility. According to the National Center for Health Statistics in 1998, and the Centers for disease control, more than 56% of deaths occur in hospitals or medical centers, 19% occur in nursing homes and 21% of people died in homes (EFMoody, 2004).
A recent study conducted of volunteers ranging in age from 44 to 77 who experienced widowing from a time frame ranging from one week to 29 years prior to examination were recently evaluated (Muller, 2003). The interviews with participants suggested that the five most prominent themes among grieving people indicating the following factors as important: (1) coping, (2) affect, (3) change, (4) details and lastly, relationship (Muller, 2003). Coping appears to be the most important theme among widowers. Therefore, the primary purpose of this group will be to assist elderly populations in developing mechanisms to better cope with grief, and affect positive change in their lives.
Unmet educational/Psychosocial needs of intended group members
Some tools that prove effective in coping with loss include: "optimism, intellectualization, positive self-talk, compartmentalization and avoidance" (Muller, 2003). Those enduring a loss noted that familial support was often helpful and appreciated, as well as physical exercise (Muller, 2003). Unmet psychosocial needs among elderly widowers include resources that help develop skills of optimism and positivism. Additionally, as a majority of widowers belonging to groups typically arise from lower socio-demographic populations, as described above, it will be critical to provide community educational resources that delineate methods of stress reduction and acceptance of the loss experienced.
Group leadership
In this particular situation, the group would best be facilitated by a social worker with training in mourning, grief and bereavement and a Psychiatric RN who will be available to address medical considerations such as depression and the possible need for pharmaceutical intervention. A social worker is best suited to deal with minority and aging populations; such a worker will be trained in techniques that need be utilized to adequately address the needs of an aging population, including an increased incidence of alcoholism and depression. The Psychiatric RN is important to deal with the clinical manifestations of such illnesses that are typically present within the elderly population.
Criteria for selection of group members
Mortality is occurring at older ages, and one enduring challenge within group therapy is acknowledgement that "mechanistic approaches to forecasting mortality or maximum life expectancy" which were often used in the past, do not currently provide an adequate picture of the many factors that influence mortality (Caselli, 110).
In England and Wales, evidence suggests that "a substantial shift has occurred in elderly people in societies which stress autonomy, such as in the United States (Caselli, 151). Patterns of social interaction are often influenced by "events and circumstances in early childhood (Caselli, 151).
Clinicians need deselect patients for group therapy rather than select (Yalom, 219), meaning that certain patients should automatically be excluded. The criteria for excluding patients should include evaluation of the following criteria which may be present: those patients that exhibit symptoms of paranoia, hypochondria, obsessive compulsiveness, violence and psychosis (Yalom, 219). Any individual that bears a social front that may be deceptive should automatically be excluded, as their intention might be to exploit other members of the group for personal gratification (Yalom, 219).
Additionally, as a sixth factor patients in the midst of an acute crisis may not be good candidates for therapy as well as deeply depressed or suicidal patients, as they require more individualized and specialized attention that is typically afforded in "heterogeneous therapy" (Yalom, 219).
Group size and type of membership
This group will be a closed therapy group, which typically meet for approximately six months or less (Yalom, 267). This type of group supports the creation of stable memberships facilitating more cohesive group interaction. Research indicates that the ideal size of an "interact ional therapy group" is seven or eight people, though some range as few as five or as many as ten (Yolam, 276). This group will consist of eight members, in order to facilitate interaction within the group without overwhelming participants. Any fewer than this and the group may cease to operate as members are not likely to interact as much
Group members will be asked to prepare for sessions by being willing to describe the following three factors: current lifestyle, age, and grief experiences.
The following will be discussed in group therapy sessions:
1) Current work status
(2) Mechanisms used to cope with grief
3) Current interest/hobbies
4) Any support mechanisms used previously to cope with loss
5) Family members available
6) Group member hobbies, careers, objectives for therapy
Where will group meetings be conducted?
Group meetings can be held in almost any setting, as long as the room in which people are meeting provides privacy and freedom from distraction (Yalom, 266). Additionally members should have the opportunity to sit in a circle to facilitate open communication and sharing. Most group participants prefer not to have obstructions to communication and free thinking, such as tables in the middle of a discussion (Yalom, 266). Such a structure may inhibit the ability of other group members to see the entire body of other members of the group and observe their "postural responses" (Yalom, 266).
Individuals to be contacted for sanction & / consent for group and member participation
Group member peers will be contacted for sanction and consent for participation in addition to social workers or occupational therapists involved in case work for each member; Within agency contacts such as the grief/loss program director will interview each potential member to ensure suitability for group therapy and cohesive personalities of group member.
Ground rules for group participation
Ground rules for participation should include attendance to at least four weekly sixty minute sessions..
Members will be required to maintain the confidentiality of any information shared within group sessions.
Group members will be expected to utilize non-offensive language throughout group sessions.
Group therapy members will be required to participate and share experiences at each session.
Group facilitator's role
The larger the group the less time available to work through individual problems (Yalom, 277) therefore it is critical to keep the size of the group within respectable limitations. The purpose of the group facilitator will be to monitor the effectiveness of group interaction and ensure that the size of the group is appropriate to the therapeutic intention; the facilitator will interact with group members only to facilitate preliminary conversation, however the majority of interaction that occurs will be expected of group members. The facilitator will serve as mediator in instances where conflict or excessive aggressive emotion may arise from the subject matter discussed within the group.
One area of deficiency that has been identified among psychologists, health care providers and support officials is the lack of provision for supplying the dying and their families with attitudes, knowledge and the skills necessary to cope with dying and bereavement, due in part to a failure of professional educators to teach these skills (Field and Cassel, 1997). Psychologists and health professionals must first "understand and manage their own reactions to dying and death" in order to develop "Science based interventions that are responsive to the needs of individuals and families" (PsychNet,…[continue]
"Bereavement Support Groups" (2004, March 02) Retrieved December 8, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/bereavement-support-groups-163819
"Bereavement Support Groups" 02 March 2004. Web.8 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/bereavement-support-groups-163819>
"Bereavement Support Groups", 02 March 2004, Accessed.8 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/bereavement-support-groups-163819
In the case of the former of these groups, there is a demand for proper training and experience in helping family members face the practical realities imposed by the death of a loved one. Further, research demonstrates that many acute care settings are lacking in the capacity to manage these particular issues, failing particularly to make some of the most basic steps needs to help the bereaved face this difficult
Group Therapy Upload Instructions Group therapy and intervention Define Group Therapy Group therapy can take many different forms. Simply stated, group therapy is therapy given to more than one individual, usually more than two. It can be family-directed, as in the case of family therapy, or it can consist of a group of strangers. In the case of some groups, such as self-help groups like Alcoholics Anonymous, there may be no therapist-facilitator. In other
Bereavement The interest in palliative care, or counseling for bereavement comes to different people in different ways, and one doctor came into it through home care as long ago as 1975. The doctor had just finished working as a house staff in the University of California in San Francisco. Then he got a job at Massachusetts General Hospital as a physician. The doctor was placed at Chelsea Memorial health Center. This
Armstrong's findings additionally relate that due to previous research and the influence of perinatal loss on postpartum depression on partnered relationships. Armstrong states that differences in continued psychological stress between mothers and fathers after a subsequent birth is another area requiring further evaluation. Specifically stated is that it is necessary to evaluate "...the strength of partnered relationships during future childbearing experiences is important to identify any potential influence of
Oftentimes, trying to snap the person out of the difficultly can aggravate matters and make the person feel misunderstood. On the other hand, people do experience distress differently and prefer different kinds of support, so Chapter 14 prescribes that we take differences such as cultural and individual too into perspective when proffering support. It may have been that M'Lyn was assisted far more by this support than by another. Skills for
Notably, such groups are applicable in nonmedical atmosphere to help people not diagnosed with mental health issues. Given the significance of interpersonal and personal issues, the group leaders must work in unity with the clients to settle on the group sessions and its direction. Participants will be allowed to discuss their familial and interpersonal issues or stressors that they can determine that link to divorce and its effects. In
Bereavement-Counseling Group Bereavement group The bereavement groups are social gatherings that most people need and belong to since there is no way to tell when bereavement may come by. However, these groups come in handy when such unforeseen sad situations come by and the affected individuals need support emotionally to go through the sad times. In as much as it is a voluntary group, in most parts people find that it is


text:
Herbert Waldstein
this wiki
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
|Herbert Waldstein
|Full Name
| ½ Human,
½ Duck
Professor Herbert George Waldstein, more commonly known as Waldstein, is a famous inventor from the year 2068, and the creator of a teleportation necklace and a time machine.
In the year 2058, Herbert stumbled across the notes for the scientific calculations needed to create a time machine. The notes, written by a man named Joseph Ni, detailed how opening a portal into the space in-between dimensions, later named "Chaos Space", would allow for the ability to travel between two points in time. Using this knowledge, Herbet started work on a machine that would tear a hole in the fabric of space and time, and in 2066, his work was completed.
However, upon showing his prototype to a group of investors, he encountered a mishap. Upon attempting to travel back to 1969 to see Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walk on the Moon. However, what his calculations did not foresee, is that travelling through Chaos Space would badly damage the cells inside of one's body. Additionally, exiting Chaos Space will combine the person with an object, should they choose an exit point being inside of something. In 1969, Herbert exited Chaos Space, and merged with a duck. Scared of his new form, he created an exit portal back, but became trapped in Chaos Space.
As a Human, Herbert was a Caucasian male, with short, black hair and green eyes. He had pale skin, and his face was permanently in a scowl while he worked. He stood at about 6'2", and was lanky. He had a scar on his left hand, which he got from an accident "regarding a cat, and my genius".
As a duck-like man, Herbert is covered with grey feathers, and has a long, blue strand of hair sticking almost straight up from the top of his head. He has a large, orange bill, and wears his teleportation necklace - the only article of clothing that did not disappear upon his merging with the duck. He has two long feathers sticking out like a tail: one being yellow, and one being green. His feet are webbed and orange. He now stands at about 7'3".
Game Appearances
Time Souls
Herbert Waldstein is expected to appear as a non-playable character in the 2014 adventure shooter Time Souls. Nothing about his role in the game is currently known.
- Herbert shares his first and middle names with H. G. Wells, the author of the 1895 novella The Time Machine.
- Herbert was adopted from the Fantendo Character Adoptfest!
|Existence Software's original characters
|Kid Kiba • Samantha Chi • Lee Koroshi-Ya • Julie Kasai • Mokuzai Roguin • Sammy Shokku • Guru Aisu • Tucker • Charlie • Bit • Yang • Blacklight • Rust • Paperboy • Piece • Tumult • Aphotic • Macabre • Syr • Cursory • Spitron • K1DD-34RE-60N3R • Daniel Gan • Herbert Waldstein • Ikyr Masis • Crux • Marvel • Cove • Trap • Trace • Necro • Luna • Sorrow • Numb • Nine • Century • Double • Egg • Clover • Root • Amelius • Light • Dwarf • Fall • Adamant • Tumble • Haruka • Kazuo • Misao • Daisuke • Kazuko • Izanagi • Ume • Sebenzu Bird • Kan • Sophie • Demi • Redd • Helloon • Princess Yuki • Trip


text:
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Oct 16, 2016
insurance experience was not the expected
be careful with the process or product that you select to initiate the project
to have more experience in insurance market
work with the 3rd provider directly
I would like to have more skill people
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 17, 2016
Implementation is complete and we are just starting to roll out. Since this is an upgrade, we don't expect there to be many issues.
Not much change from the previous version. More robust.
Work with a different implementation vendor.
2 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 12, 2016
We had implementation issues and 3rd party issues. We also had big expectations that were not fulfilled and had a lot of issues with support.
Research very closely why do you want to adopt a BPM project. There is a lot of flexibility in the plataform, but IBM advice is to use the user interface integrated with the product, this approach will not work in a UX oriented company.
It is a robust product. Once you understand what are you doing, it will be very helpful.
Terrible UX, even for things that look so simple. One example of this is the Administration Portal, it is not possible to see the Business Object data and is very difficult to modify it, unless you use a REST API.
Support is really not good. The answers that we got for almost all the time made us feel that we were the problem.
We are actually starting over with a new vendor and with a completely different strategy to approach BPM projects.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 12, 2016
This is a good tool but takes big investment and doesn't make it easy to share and abstract work processes in other formats.
Understand the business need and ROI.
Drives standardization in documenting business processes.
Presentation and communication of the outcomes of the tool.
Better export and visualization options.
Start small, high level, and iterate as programs evolve.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 12, 2016
BlueworksLive has positives and negatives. The positive side is the integration with other IBM products, central repository for processes, and the adherence to BPMN notation. Since it enforces proper notation it is easy to rollout to inexperienced users. The negative side of the tool is that it seems to have a mind of its own regarding how to connect processes and it can be temperamental when you need to display a process in a certain way. Its connectors can be confusing.
Make sure to thoroughly test the application for use with your models.
Easy to entend to more users and enforces consistency.
Can be restrictive.
Nothing, the vendor has been great to work with.
We would and plan to conduct a more in-depth application POC.
2 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 11, 2016
Complex product to implement, did not integrate well with existing technology infrastructure.
Do your due dilligence, ensure you look at all integration points with existing infrastructure such as active directory integration, etc.
It's declining use within our organization.
Due to the complexity, it takes too much effort to add, change, configure features and functions.
More transparency up front, don't say the product can do everything when you know it's not without significant effort.
Resist pressure to go with the ig vendor, expand the search for other products, look at open source.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 11, 2016
Overall experience was good. We were able to deliver better business outcome using IBM ODM, BPM.
Detail out your business and technical requirements upfront and share them with vendors to assess the right fit and right products for your product solution.
24/7 support.
Being the one of the first ones to implement product comes with challenges, risks.
Was looking for federated model and had few challenges.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Mar 16, 2016
Ease of use.
Pick a small project to try out the new tool.
Once again, it's easy to consume.
Facilitate the first few meetings.
Customer/Stakeholder buyin is important.
This is actually the benefit of this product; its outcome can be integrated with other products in the IBM SW development lifecyle.
1 of 1 peer(s) found this review helpful.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Mar 16, 2016
Always received good support from IBM license management team.
Know your requirement, especially your non functional requirement.
Performance and IBM SME support.
Send the right product integration team.
Work with vendor expert as soon as you identify the BPM product of choice.
Once again, understand the complexity of the overall system and invest on piloting effort
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Mar 8, 2016
Be it a small (thousands of pages) or large app (millions of pages), the docs are retrieved within 5-10 secs. Any issue has been related to the suporting infrastruture, not the ECM product. As a result, ECM is bringing value to the user community.
Your users need to know their business, Hire qualified staff, Never stop training staff.
Always runs. For the past 18 months, with mimimal intervention, the product has run M-F, 9 hrs a day w/o a minute of production downtime.
Vendor has been completely supportive.
Start sooner.
I can not keep up with the new capabilites embedded into the IBM P8 product suite. CPE, ICN, Case Manager, Datacap. It is amazing and makes our job both challanging and fun. We are able to make ECM better and better.
When you need them, Support is there .
We are supporting over 20 apps. Each has its own time line. Some take 2 months, others take 3-5 months. Depends upon the users' requirements.


text:
The average cost for a Radiator Replacement is between $612 and $921. Labor costs are estimated between $114 and $145 while parts are priced between $498 and $776. Get a personalized estimate based on your location and specific car. Estimate does not include taxes and fees.
Radiator Replacement Cost for Suzuki Sidekick
Radiator Replacement Estimate (National Average)
Validated estimate range for national average.
View Estimate Details
Parts & Labor Breakdown
Labor: $114 - $145
Parts: $498 - $776
Estimate does not include taxes and fees.
Best Practices
The entire cooling system should be inspected and tested when the radiator is replaced.
Common Symptoms
A failing radiator can cause the Suzuki Sidekick's engine to run hot or overheat.
Most radiators are made of metal and plastic. The plastic parts can become brittle and crack over time, thus requiring replacement of the radiator.
Last step before receiving your estimate:
* Estimate for all Suzuki Sidekick model years. Get a more accurate price by entering in your year.


text:
Coupons & Offers tagged as mynutramart promo codes
Latest list of mynutramart promo codes. Use these mynutramart promo codes to save when you are shopping at mynutramart.com.
1 Active Offers
success 100%
View Offer
Get flat 30% off on Magnus nutritions.
Only valid for products listed on landing page. No coupon code is required to grab this offer. This offer is valid till 10-Dec-2016.
- Page 1 / 1
- «
- 1
- »


text:
Spotify's Play List For The "Singletons" This Valentine's Day!
Valentine's day has soo many expections attached to it and for those who are single its a reminder of failed relationships. The classic "Bridget Jones" syndrome!!
So Spotify wanted to include those in between finding true love. With the help Helen Fielding who is the creator of "Bridget Jones" this some might say is the ultimate playlist for any Bridget Joneses spending Vday alone!!
"All By Myself" - Celine Dion
"I Will Survice - Gloria Gaynor
"I Want That Man" - Debbie Harry
Mad About the Boy - Dinah Washington
Littlest Things - Lily Allen
Sister Rosetta Goes Before US - Alison Krauss and Robert Plant
Play the Game - Queen
Crazy For You - Madonna
You Know I'm No Good - Amy Winehouse
I'm Every Woman - Chaka Khan
Killer Queen - Queen
Don't Get Me Wrong - Pretenders
Eternal Flame - the Bangles
Could It Be Magic - Donna Summer
Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow? - Carole King
I Don't Wanna Lose You - Tina Turner
Respect - Aretha Franklin
The Wind - Cat Stevens
It's Raining Men.- The Weather Girls
Have You Met Miss Jones - Robbie Williams
Do you think they missed out some classic's? or where they on point with this "Ultimate" Bridget Jones Playlist
Source for photo: http://fhdwallpaper.com/


text:
Phil Ivey doesn't lose a huge sum of money online. And getting ready for the World Series of Poker. It's all in our daily wrap-up of the world of poker, the Hit and Run.
Phil "Polarizing" Ivey was one of the biggest winners this past weekend at the online high-stakes cash games. How much? $181K. Unfortunately, he's still the biggest loser this year. More details here. Also, Viktor "Isildur1″ Blom loses more than $300K.
Are you psychologically prepared to play in the World Series of Poker? If not, check out these tips so you are ready. One of the top tips? Have fun.
–The "Sheldon Adelson Primary" will feature grilling of Republican presidential contenders on online gambling.
–Rand Paul snapchats a game of liar's poker with Dan Bilzerian? OK…
–The LAPT Panama switches venues.
–Before anyone tried to create a new law for online gaming, perhaps the current laws should be fixed.
–Payment services provider SafeCharge announced that it was now working with PokerStars.
–Updates from the Mid-States Poker Tour Canterbury Park.
-Quantifying Variance: Streaks & Tilt in Heads-Up SNGs Pt. 3
–Tonybet Poker's OFC Grand Prix begins this weekend.
–Full Tilt launches the International Poker Tour.
Get your daily dose of poker news with the PTP Hit and Run.
|Don't want to deposit? Try free bankrolls.
Titan Poker
Major room, easy qualify
Sky Poker
Good for MTT / SNGs Only
|Complete Online Poker Room Reviews
|Bet365 Bonus Code: PBONUS
|PlanetWin365 Promotion Code: 5CGQYAAAABZGE3TB
|888 Poker Review and Bonus
|Sky Casino and Poker Review
Online since 2004, PartTimePoker.com brings together a unique combination of top-paying poker rakeback and prop offers and a variety of poker-related content including poker news, strategy articles, free poker training reviews and the latest Poker News and Gossip. PartTimePoker.com - your best source for online poker.
PTP offers several rakeback and free bankroll offers for our viewers. If you're not familiar with rakeback, read our guide to online poker rakeback. To learn how much you could be earning with rakeback, check out our rakeback calculator.
Free and no deposit bankrolls (also called free poker money) are essentially promotional deals we've arranged with rooms where they give you a small amount of money (usually $10-$150) started.