text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
September 2, 2011
COUNCIL FOR EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, USA,PLAINTIFFv. AGATA CZOPEK AND HARRISTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, :: DEFENDANTS
Before the court are Defendants Harristown Development Corporation ("HDC") and Agata Czopek's ("Czopek") motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. (Docs. 12 & 17.) For the reasons set forth below, the motions will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background*fn1
A. Parties
Plaintiff, Council for Educational Travel, USA ("CETUSA") is a
nonprofit organization that is dedicated to promoting the
understanding of different cultures. (Compl. ¶ 6.) CETUSA works to
coordinate employment opportunities for exchange students from all
over the world. (Id.) Defendant HDC is a corporation
with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania.*fn2
(Id. ¶ 3.) Defendant Czopek was hired by CETUSA to manage its
client accounts for those clients located in the region around
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. (Id. ¶ 12.)
B. Facts
During her employment with CETUSA, Czopek was provided with client lists and other proprietary information including, but not limited to, a list of CETUSA's overseas partners. (Id. ¶ 13.) On December 22, 2009, Czopek signed a written acknowledgment in which she agreed to return: all tangible and intangible property belonging to CETUSA issued to [the employee], or created by [the employee] as an employee during [the employee's] employment, including but not limited to . . . documents relating or pertaining to potential contacts, contracts, coordinators, clients, host families, mailing lists, account information, samples, prototypes, price lists, pricing information . . . . (Id. ¶ 14.) Additionally, the acknowledgment states: "I further represent and warrant that I will not retain any copies, electronic or otherwise, of such property upon separation of employment with CETUSA." (Id.)
On November 5, 2010, Czopek left her employment at CETUSA without any advance notification and began working at HDC. (Id. ¶ 16.) The complaint alleges that Czopek did not return any documents "relating or pertaining to potential contacts, contracts, coordinators, clients, host families, mailing lists, account information, samples, prototypes, price lists, [or] pricing information" upon her termination. (Id. ¶ 17.) It further alleges that if she is permitted to continue working at HDC, CETUSA will suffer irreparable injury. (Id. ¶ 18.) Lastly, the complaint avers that Czopek and HDC have divulged and continue to divulge, make use of, and profit from this information, including but not limited to CETUSA's client lists, fees charged, and other proprietary information concerning CETUSA's relationship with clients. (Id. ¶ 19.)
C. Procedural History
On April 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed its complaint claiming (1) misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act, 12 PA. CONS. STAT. § 5301, et seq. ("PUTSA")against Czopek and HDC (Count I); (2) breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty against Czopek (Count II); and (3) intentional interference with actual and prospective contractual relations against Czopek and HDC (Count III). (Doc. 1.) Defendant HDC filed its motion to dismiss on May 9, 2011 (Doc. 12) and brief in support on May 23, 2011 (Doc. 14). Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition on June 8, 2011 (Doc. 16) to which HDC replied on June 27, 2011 (Doc. 19). Defendant Czopek filed a motion to dismiss on June 13, 2011 (Doc. 17) and brief in support on June 21, 2011 (Doc. 18). A brief in opposition was filed on June 30, 2011 (Doc. 20) and reply brief on July 15, 2011 (Doc. 22). Thus, both motions are ripe for disposition.
II. Standard
When presented with a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court "must accept all of the complaint's well-pleaded facts as true, but may disregard any legal conclusions," Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210 (3d Cir. 2009), and ultimately must determine "whether the facts alleged in the complaint are sufficient to show that the plaintiff has a 'plausible claim for relief.'" Id. at 211 (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, ___U.S.___, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009)). Additionally, the court must "accept as true all factual allegations in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, and view them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff." Kanter v. Barella, 489 F.3d 170, 177 (3d Cir. 2007) (quoting Evancho v. Fisher, 423 F.3d 347, 350 (3d Cir. 2005)). The complaint must do more than allege the plaintiff's entitlement to relief; it must "show such an entitlement with its facts." Fowler, 578 F.3d at 211 (citations omitted). As the Supreme Court instructed in Iqbal, "[w]here the well-pleaded facts do not permit the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged-but it has not 'show[n]'-'that the pleader is entitled to relief.'" Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1950 (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a) (alterations in original)). In other words, a claim has "facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Id. at 1949 (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). "Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements do not suffice." Id.
"To decide a motion to dismiss, courts generally consider only the allegations contained in the complaint, exhibits attached to the complaint and matters of public record." Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993) (citations omitted); see also Sands v. McCormick, 502 F.3d 263, 268 (3d Cir. 2007). The court may consider "undisputedly authentic document[s] that a defendant attaches as an exhibit to a motion to dismiss if the plaintiff's claims are based on the [attached] document[s]." Pension Benefit, 998 F.2d at 1196. Additionally, "documents whose contents are alleged in the complaint and whose authenticity no party questions, but which are not physically attached to the pleading, may be considered." Pryor v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, 288 F.3d 548, 560 (3d Cir. 2002) (citation omitted); see also U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. Higgins, 281 F.3d 383, 388 (3d Cir. 2002) ("Although a district court may not consider matters extraneous to the pleadings, a document integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint may be considered without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment.") (internal quotation omitted). However, the court may not rely on other parts of the record in making its decision. Jordan v. Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, 20 F.3d 1250, 1261 (3d Cir. 1994).
III. Discussion
A. Misappropriation of Trade Secrets under PUTSA
Both HDC and Czopek raise three arguments for dismissal of CETUSA's misappropriation of trade secrets claim. First, they claim that CETUSA failed to specifically allege that a non-compete agreement was executed between Czopek and CETUSA. Second, they claim that CETUSA failed to identify what specific confidential information was misappropriated. Lastly, to the extent that CETUSA is alleging that Czopek misappropriated client lists, Defendants argue that an employee's personal contacts while made during plaintiff's employ are not trade secrets. For the reasons below, the court disagrees.
First, although the complaint does not specifically reference a "non-compete agreement" or "confidentiality agreement," it does state that CETUSA requires its staff to sign an "acknowledgment" that, as noted above, expressly requires the return of tangible and intangible proprietary and confidential information upon separation of employment with CETUSA including, inter alia, client lists and account information.
Under PUTSA, misappropriation does not necessarily require that a restrictive covenant be executed. A "misappropriation" is defined under the statute as:
(1) acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or
(2) disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent by a person who:
(i) used improper means to acquire knowledge of the trade secret;
(ii) at the time of disclosure or use, knew or had reason to know that his knowledge of the trade secret was:
(A) derived from or through a person who
had utilized improper means to acquire it;
(B) acquired under circumstances giving rise to a
duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use; or
(C) derived from or through a person who owed a
duty to the person seeking relief to maintain its
secrecy or limit its use; or
(iii) before a material change of his position, knew or had reason to know that it was a trade secret and that knowledge of it had been acquired by accident or mistake.
12 PA. CONS. STAT. § 5302. Thus, the statute only requires that the misappropriating party knew or had reason to know that a trade secret was acquired under circumstances requiring a duty to maintain secrecy or otherwise limit its use. See EXL Labs., LLC v. Kris Egolf, et al., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25295, at *19-20 (E.D. Pa. March 11, 2011) (finding that a lack of a signed confidentiality agreement is not necessarily dispositive to plaintiff's PUTSA claim especially where other precautions are taken by plaintiff).
Here, the complaint alleges that Czopek signed an acknowledgment that restricts the use of and promises to return certain proprietary and confidential information. (Id. ¶ 14.) Thus, Plaintiff's argument ultimately fails because these averments allow the court to reasonably infer that the alleged trade secrets were acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain secrecy or otherwise limit their use and indeed suggest the existence of a restrictive covenant of some form. Accordingly, Defendants' motions will be denied in this regard.
Secondly, the Defendants, citing Bioquell v. Feinstein, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124077 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 23, 2010), argue that the complaint is deficient because it does not identify the specific trade secrets allegedly misappropriated. In Bioquell, the complaint averred that "trade secrets were acquired during the course of . . . employment with Plaintiff, said trade secrets were not generally available to the public, and that the [defendant] induced the [former employee] to engage in the misappropriation of said trade secrets." Id. at *16. The court concluded that this complaint was "merely a string of conclusory statements devoid of any factual basis" and thus dismissed the misappropriation claim. Id. at *17.
Notwithstanding the holding in Bioquell, other courts in the Third Circuit have not required a plaintiff to describe trade secrets with particularity in order to survive a motion to dismiss. In Center Pointe Sleep Assocs., LLC v. Panian, the court found that a general description of the trade secrets at issue was sufficient, noting that the exact trade secret in question need not be pleaded with particularity. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21808, at *10 (W.D. Pa. March 18, 2009). There, the complaint described the trade secrets at issue as relating to "the truck driver sleep apnea screening proposal designed by Center Pointe" as well as "client and prospective client lists" and "marketing materials and strategies of Center Pointe." Id. at *4. The court found that this general description sufficiently described the alleged trade secrets at issue. Id. at *10. Similarly, in Ideal Aerosmith, Inc. v. Acutronic USA, Inc., the court found that the complaint was sufficient where it described the alleged trade secrets as "information concerning the development, marketing and sale of Ideal's Aero 4000 motion controller, customer communications and other property." 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91644, at *22-23 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2007); see also Pennfield Precision, Inc. v. EF Precision, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11971, at *10 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2000) ("[C]courts are in general agreement that trade secrets need not be disclosed in detail in a complaint alleging misappropriation for the simple reason that such a requirement would result in public disclosure of the purported trade secret."); Reckitt Benckiser Inc., et al., v. Tris Pharma, Inc., et al., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19713, at *9 (3d Cir. Feb. 28, 2011) ("[A] claim of misappropriation of trade secret 'does not require specific pleading of the precise information that constitutes the trade secret in order to survive a motion to dismiss.'") (interpreting New Jersey law) (internal citations omitted).
Here, Plaintiff does not plead misappropriation of a general, generic trade secret, but specifies that the trade secrets allegedly involved include CETUSA's strategic business and marketing plans, computer programs and codes, client lists and information regarding client accounts, employee rosters and compensation terms. (Compl. ¶ 8.) The court finds this description to be more than a mere formulaic recitation of the elements of the cause of action. Indeed, the type of information alleged to be confidential and proprietary is within the scope of protectable trade interests. See BIEC Int'l, Inc. v. Global Steel Serv., Ltd., 791 F. Supp. 489, 544-47 (E.D. Pa. 1992) (customer lists, costing and pricing plans, marketing strategies, financial projections, and terms of customer accounts may qualify as trade secrets). Thus, the motions will be denied in this regard.
Lastly, Defendants argue that Plaintiff's misappropriation of trade secret claim must be dismissed because the complaint fails to articulate any trade secret at all. Defendants argue that personal business contacts made while in plaintiff's employ do not constitute trade secrets. (Doc. 14 at 10 of 22; Doc. 18 at 8 of 15 (both citing Nat'l Risk Mgmt., Inc. v. Bramwell, 819 F. Supp. 417, 431 (E.D. Pa. 1993)). The court notes initially that although Czopek's "personal business contacts" could implicate the client lists and accounts allegedly misappropriated, Plaintiff also cites other alleged trade secrets including business and marketing plans, computer programs and codes, and employee information that are not derived from personal business contacts. More importantly, questions of whether or not trade secrets exist are questions of fact, and thus not appropriate for resolution on motions to dismiss. Brokerage Concepts, Inc. v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10807, at *30 (E.D. Pa. July 27, 1995) (citing West Mountain Poultry Co. v. Gress, 455 A.2d 651, 652 (Pa. Super. 1982)). Here, Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded the existence of trade secrets and Defendants are disputing the validity of those averments. At this stage, the court is obligated to accept those well-pleaded facts contained in the complaint as true and thus Defendants' factual challenges are premature and Defendants' motions are denied.
B. Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Duty of Loyalty
Defendant Czopek argues for dismissal of Plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty claim, again alleging that Plaintiff has alleged only conclusions, not facts, to support such a claim. Specifically, Czopek argues that Plaintiff has not alleged a breach of fiduciary duty because it failed to identified specifically which corporate opportunities were diverted, what confidential or trade secret information was shared, or that CETUSA was injured by Czopek's alleged conduct. Here again, Defendant's motion will be denied.
In order to allege a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, a plaintiff must first establish that a fiduciary or confidential relationship exists. Bioquell, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124077, at *15; Baker v. Family Credit Counseling Corp., 440 F. Supp. 2d 392, 414 (E.D. Pa. 2006). Additionally, a plaintiff must also allege that (1) the defendant negligently or intentionally failed to act in good faith and solely for the benefit of plaintiff in all matters for which he or she was employed; (2) the plaintiff suffered injury; and (3) the defendant's failure to act solely for the plaintiff's benefit was a real factor in bringing about plaintiff's injuries. Bioquell, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124077, at *15; Baker, 440 F. Supp. 2d at 414-15.
Here, Plaintiff alleges that Czopek was an employee of CETUSA and held a "high level and key position" wherein she was provided with CETUSA's client lists and other proprietary information. (Compl. ¶¶ 12, 13, 34.) Plaintiff further alleges that Czopek signed a written acknowledgment to return the proprietary information at the conclusion of her employment. (Id. ¶ 14.) The court is satisfied that these allegations sufficiently establish the existence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship. Likewise, Plaintiff sufficiently alleges that Czopek failed to act in good faith and for the benefit of Plaintiff by alleging that Czopek "suddenly and abruptly left her employment at CETUSA and began working for HDC" and has breached her fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty by "diverting or attempting to divert corporate opportunities," "sharing the confidentially, trade secret and/or [other] proprietary information," and "soliciting and/or diverting CETUSA's clientele to Defendants Czopek and HDC." (Id. ¶¶ 16, 35.) Thus, Plaintiff's allegations contain more than a formulaic "Czopek breached her fiduciary duty" claim and instead provide sufficient factual allegations to state a plausible claim.
The court also finds that Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded injury and that Czopek's failure to act solely for Plaintiff's benefit was the real factor in bringing about those injuries. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that as a direct and proximate result of Czopek's above-mentioned breach of fiduciary duty, "CETUSA has suffered immediate irreparable harm, including but not limited to the loss of tangible economic opportunities that Defendant Czopek intentionally and wrongfully diverted to her current employer . . . ." (Id. ¶37.) In order for a breach of fiduciary duty claim and misappropriation of trade secrets claim to survive a 12(b)(6) motion, a plaintiff need not plead specific damages. First Am. Marketing Corp. v. Canella, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2251, at *25 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2004). Accordingly, Defendant Czopek's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty claim will be denied.*fn3
C. Intentional Interference with Actual and Prospective Contractual Relations
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants engaged in wrongful actions including diverting corporate opportunities from CETUSA, sharing confidential and/or trade secret information without authorization, and soliciting and/or diverting CETUSA's clientele to HDC. (Compl. ¶ 42.) Plaintiff alleges that by engaging in such wrongful conduct "the economic relationships between CETUSA and its clients and/or prospective clients were actually interfered with and/or disrupted." (Id. ¶¶ 44, 45.)
In claiming interference with existing and prospective contractual relations, Plaintiff is alleging two distinct torts. To sufficiently state a claim for these claims, Plaintiff must allege: (1) the existence of a contractual or prospective contractual relation between itself and a third party; (2) purposeful action on the part of the defendant, specifically intended to harm the existing relation, or to prevent the prospective relation from occurring; (3) the absence of a privilege or justification on the part of the defendant; and (4) actual legal damage. Pilot Air Freight Corp. v. Sandair, Inc., 118 F. Supp. 2d 557, 562-63 (E.D. Pa. 2000) (citing Brokerage Concepts, Inc. v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 140 F.3d 494, 529 (3d Cir. 1998)). In addition, for prospective contracts, Plaintiff must allege a reasonable likelihood that the relationship would have occurred but for the interference of the defendant. Id. at 563.
For a claim of interference with an existing contract to withstand 12(b)(6) scrutiny, Plaintiff must allege the existence of a contractual relationship with an identified third party. Courts have held that because the subject contract actually exists, a claim for intentional interference with contractual relations must include "definite, exacting identification." Square D Co. v. Scott Elec. Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39974, at *13 (W.D. Pa. May 16, 2008) (citing Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. D'Abmro, 596 A.2d 867, 872 (Pa. Super. 1991) (dismissing counterclaim for interference with existing or prospective business relations because Defendant "failed to even provide a name with whom the alleged relationship exists.")); see also Bioquell, 2010 U.S. Dist LEXIS 124077, at *19 (dismissing claim for tortious interference with business relations because "Plaintiff fail[ed] to identify a single contract or client that it lost as a result of Defendants' actions"). Here, Plaintiff only alleges that Defendants' actions interfered with "CETUSA's relationships with clients and/or prospective clients." (Compl. ¶¶ 41, 43, 46) (emphasis added). Because Plaintiff fails to identify a single client, or point to a single contract that was subject to alleged interference, this claim must be dismissed.
Likewise, to claim interference with prospective contractual relations, a plaintiff must "allege a reasonable probability that he would have entered into a contractual relationship with a third party." Flannery v. Mid Penn Bank, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97978, at *26 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2008). This requires the plaintiff to identify with sufficient precision which, if any, prospective contracts it would have entered into but for the alleged tortious interference. Plaintiff's complaint does not contain a single factual allegation that would allow the court to infer that a contractual relationship with a third party is reasonably probable. Thus, this claim must also be dismissed.
Defendants also argue, and the court agrees, that Plaintiff failed to plead actual harm or damage resulting from Defendants' conduct. Instead, Plaintiff rather generically states that relationships between CETUSA and "clients and/or prospective clients" were "actually interfered with and/or disrupted." (Compl. ¶¶ 44, 45.) Although Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) would not require that Plaintiff cite to specific numbers and the court notes that damages regarding something as speculative as a prospective contract would be difficult if not impossible to specifically calculate at this point, Plaintiff must nevertheless provide some factual enhancement beyond its conclusory claim. Plaintiff's inability to plead actual damages for interference with existing or prospective contracts is very likely related to Plaintiff's failure to identify in the first instance any client, contract, or reasonably likely prospective contract.
The Third Circuit has instructed district courts to grant leave to amend when a complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. See Shane v. Fauver, 213 F.3d 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2000). District courts nevertheless retain discretion to deny a plaintiff leave to amend his complaint when amendment would be futile or would cause undue delay. Id. at 115. Here, the complaint's lack of factual specificity can be cured and therefore the court finds that amending the complaint would not be futile.*fn4 Plaintiff has not previously filed an amended complaint, thus doing so would not cause undue delay.
An appropriate order will issue.
Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge
COUNCIL FOR EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, USA, Plaintiff v. : : AGATA CZOPEK and HARRISTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendants
Judge Sylvia H. Rambo
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 12 & 17) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1) The motions are DENIED with regard to Count I of Plaintiff's complaint;
2) Defendant Czopek's motion is DENIED with regard to Count II Plaintiff's complaint;
3) The motions are GRANTED with regard to Count III of Plaintiff's complaint;
4) Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order in order to remedy the complaint in accordance with the accompanying memorandum. If Plaintiff opts not to file an amended complaint, this action will proceed on the original complaint, absent the claim dismissed herein.
s/Sylvia H. Rambo
United States District Judge
Dated: September 2, 2011.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
× View Today's Deals
You missed it This great deal for Cooper Alley Hair Salon is over. But don't despair, we've got more great deals every day.
Related Deals That You May Like
Hair Loft SF
Keratin, Conditioning, or Brazilian Blowout
Marin County$350$149.99
Creative Locks by Jenna
Haircut with Color or Highlights and Blow Dry
Marin County$140$69.99
Atelier Emmanuel
Partial Highlights, Shampoo, and Blow Dry
Marin County$122$74
Insignia Hair Salon
Ombre or Partial Highlights, Color, or Blowout
Marin County$60$28.99
Cooper Alley Hair Salon
Haircut and Kératase Package with Option for a Single-Process Color or Full Highlights
- Save 59%
- 158 purchased
deal over
deal over!
100% recommendedin LivingSocial customer ratings
With sleek, dark wood floors that connect über-mod mirror-lined walls, this salon offers luxurious pampering by a caring and top-of-the-line stylist. Clients know to expect an on-trend new look when they leave this Larkspur salon:
• $49 ($120 value) for a haircut, style, and Kératase treatment
• $89 ($230 value) for this package, plus a single-process color
• $119 ($310 value) for a haircut, style, full highlights, and a Kératase treatment
PAID VALUE EXPIRES ON December 10, 2021
PROMOTIONAL VALUE EXPIRES ON April 28, 2014

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Accommodation options within 8km from Chartwell Manor include:
Take big city glamour, mix in some country escape, add a twist of the bushveld, warm hospitality, excellent food, truly great value – and you'll have Zulu Nyala Country Manor. Situated in gracious Chartwell on the outskirts of Northern Johannesburg.
Hoyohoyo Chartwell Lodge and Conference Venue is a boutique hotel setting in the heart of Johannesburg's northern suburbs that offers a country style backdrop for the discerning businessman, executive or tourist.
This intimate owner-run boutique hotel lies in the serene country setting of Chartwell a mere 15 minutes from Lanseria Airport and 20 minutes from Sandton CBD. It is is a hidden gem offering a country feeling within minutes from the rushed city life...
On outskirts of Greater Johannesburg (near Fourways) on the Klein Jukskei River, stands this prominent four-storied Castle on 5 ha. Spacious and peaceful, with a beautiful garden, maze and swimming pool.
Hoopoe Haven is a small and peaceful country guest house in beautiful Chartwell. Close to Fourways, lion park, 3 shopping malls, Lanseria and live theatre at Broadacres and Montecasino. We offer self-catering cottages and B&B in the lodge.


text:
A very hip, cool vibe, in a great location and at an even better price point. The rooms were extremely loud at night, and the staff was not helpful in solving the problem.
My friend and I were staying here for a conference (at a nearby hotel). It was a beautiful hotel very chic and stylish. It was well placed to walk to the French Quarter and many other points of interest. Staff was very kind, hospitable and helpful, especially Michael. We would definitely stay there again! No cold water from the tap in our room.
the hotel was close to everything, and it was nice. the heater didnt work and theres 2 buildings and you had to go to the main building for everything.
Parking lot behind the hotel was very convenient. Comfortable rooms. Closet to everything but still off the major streets Staff wasn't knowledgable when asked what highlights a touris couple should see. Wasn't friendly during check in or check out
convience of location the TV stations, the bed, and the AC
Very stylish and confortable rooms. The menu at the kitchen tried to be a bit too artisinal. There was one waitress who seemed pretty bogged down.
Old fashion style was cool Rooms smelt "old" and muggy, check-in was extremely late (4 PM) and apparently "ungarunteed" (some people waited 2 hours), parking was $42 a night (extremely unreasonabled to other hotels), no bell hop even though rooms were split between streets
Good quality decor good location. Very rude staff on front desk.
The Staff was great very helpful
don't like add on cost. Telephone ect.
Employees were generally happy and gladly answered any questions. Hotel is groovy and quaint, as are the rooms.
Convience to the downtown area and central location to restaurants and entertainment. Parking was very easy and convient. Coffee pot in room was not cleaned.
Clean and comfortable room that was a great value for the money.
The bed was extremely uncomfortable.
Location, Value, Staff. We walked to the Riverwalk Outlets, Dragos, Harrahs Casino, Aquarium. We got a cab ride to the French Quarter and Bourbon St. The hotel was very clean and the suite was very spacious with 2 TV's. I loved the rich history of the building. It was originally a bank and still has the vault, teller service windows, etc on the lobby. VERY noisy. I could hear a lot of hallway noise. Also, it may have just been the night we stayed (Thursday) but at 4:30 AM the city came down Poydras to empty the dumpsters (very loud) and it woke the toddler (sigh). That can possibly be chalked up to wrong place, wrong time but just be aware if you're staying on a Thursday night. Parking was too expensive but to be fair that's ALL hotels in the area. The hotel was once a bank so there are very few (if any) extras...no roomservice, no spa, etc.
Love the architecture.
I booked this hotel in April 2014 for my trip in November 2014... i confirmed two days before my trip and everything was all set. We arrived and the lady behind the desk said there was a letter that was left for her that stated we needed to be sent to another hotel. No reason given and she wouldn't let us see the letter...ok... so we went to the other hotel which was conveniently located right in the middle of the French quarters... upon arrival we were told that they had no offiliation with the whitney nor do they know why we were sent there...after telling us we had to pay triple what the Whitney charged I explained that was not far to us...i was willing to pay the same rate as the Whitney but I was certainly not paying triple! One of the managers came out and accommodated us with a free night! Therefore I recommend taking your business to the Bourbon Orleans hotel!
Decent location, clean, nice bathrooms. Of the three prepaid rooms our group booked far in advance, only two were available and there was no roll-away bed available for the room in which three people were staying. One couple in our group had to take a taxi across town after about 20-30 minutes of searching for an open room. One person in the room sans roll-away bed had to sleep on the floor. The following day, another room was made available, however, no one from the hotel informed the group in the room without the roll-away that they needed to more their belongings until after everyone was out and about for the day. The hotel called us throughout the day, interrupting our plans. The manager was very rude and didn't seem to understand that the hotel was interfering with plans made months in advance. Eventually, we were bothered so constantly that some members of the group returned to resolve the situation in person. Overall a very bad experience. I have traveled quite a bit, and my experience at this hotel is the worst that comes to mind.
Location, it was central Room was small and outdated Facilities non existent Restaurant was meh
We just expected a little better than what we got. Expected the sweet to be a little sweeter
The staff was absolutely amazing. The location wasn't bad. Nothing special, but not bad. The rooms were TINY. The furniture in the rooms were pretty chewed up. There really weren't any extra amenities. It's expensive for what you get. For about $10 more, you can get a bigger room at a hotel that is closer to the French Quarter. Yeah, the staff was great, but I don't pay extra for helpful staff.
The architecture, design, choice of furnishings and keeping the existing bank for a backdrop is a nice touch. The room (610) was quite nice and comfortable. The staff were all very professional but Jo Ann in the bar was wonderful. The only improvement possible would be the in-hotel restaurant. To be quite frank, the quality was not so good and the portions small when compared to every other place we dined in and around the French Quarter of equal or lesser price. Your meal pricing (we first tried breakfast and then stopped-) was also at the top of the cost range we experienced in and outside the French Quarter. Had the quality and quantity been better we would have happily spent more time in your restaurant. In our opinion, correct this and you'll have the perfect hotel.
Very helpfull people, very clean, and perfect room All is perfect
Great stay with a great staff. The hotel is located on the riverside which allows for easy access to the river walk, the auditorium, Harrah's Casino and Drago (which is in the hotel).
They charged extra for wifi and the gym. I thought this was tacky when paying over $200 a night forms room.
location was awesome parking fee was ridiculous could hear guest in the hallway check in was confusing, you had to be a hilton honor to get faster service
Close to casino, Bourbon Street and restaurants. Air conditioner didn't work. We had to call several times for it to get fixed. After it improved it didn't last long. We had to call again. It never was fixed.
Clean Overnight parking rates are ridiculous over $40 a night
Staff was great, especially Kelly at the Front Desk You're being nickled and dimed. Had to get a few pages printed, which were $3.56 each (double-sided) and it came to almost $200 for 50 pages. Wanted to go to the gym, which is an additional $12. The hotel is quite spread out. Going from my room in Building 3 to the gym was a 20 minute walk (and I walk fast). Not a big deal for me, since I considered it part of my cardio workout.
connected to outlets and cafe du monde! On the river
It was very close to the French Quarter Festival activities. The rooms were nice and we loved having appetizers and drink at the bar after a busy day of activities.
beds were very comfortable! Great location! Clean room. pool was cold its a southern state would be better heated. The refridge hummed the whole time. We had to plug it in when we got to the room. Wifi should be free for all. Its 2016 after all. Some english speaking house keepers would be nice as to have communcation instead of a yes from the staff when they clearly dont understand. maybe offer engllish classes to staff that wants to learn.
The hotel was in a great location and very walkable to various New Orleans attractions. The staff was very friendly and accommodating. They allowed me to change my room to a double queen and check-in early as well as do a late check out until 3 which I appreciated. The room was a nice size for two people. The bathroom wasn't as clean as I would like. There was hair left over from the previous occupant. The blanket was also dirty when I separated it from the sheet.
The location Everything has a huge fee associated with it, the valets were unfriendly and purposely gave us bad directions because we used self Park, our room felt like a motel six, the bed didn't have a comforter, when I called they acted unconcerned and sent up a thin scratchy blanket. The tv signal was terrible, the remote was from the 1990's, it literally took 4 seconds to change from one channel to the next. all of the appliances were unplugged. We were scheduled for 3 nights but we cancelled the last two and switched to a bnb in uptown. MUCH BETTER EXPERIENCE. The same price when you add up all the extras the Hilton tries to gouge you on.
Riverside view, mall access from hotel, cleanliness Pool closed due to weather, could have used a microwave and unclear channels.
Not much A/ c didn't work had to sweat all night an the price we paid was a rip off
no free parking
Great place to stay
The staff was excellent. Very friendly and accommodating.
Room service food was not satisfactory, and would not recommend anyone order from there.
People were very friendly and knew how to get someone around the city. Room was very nice. Our room was very hot. We had to get a fan and that didn't help much and I am cold natured. Vent in bathroom did not work and tv controller did not work.
We had a wonderful stay. The staff were all friendly and helpful, especially John, the Valet. The room was great, and the location of the hotel was too. We will be back! Nothing, except we didn't get to stay longer
Great location and staff was wonderful! They picked us out a room on the 8th floor with a beautiful view of Canal Street and the Mississippi River. Will book again on our next trip back to New Orleans.
Breakfast was fine, close to the sites Charged me $150 for deposit and still haven't gotten it back.
Location was perfect! A short walk to everything, but not so close that there was street noise. I also enjoyed the exposed brick walls, and my corner/wrap-around room was very spacious and full of natural light!! A/C worked great, and the number of towels provided was more than sufficient. Pillows were flat and needed more stuffing in them. The sheets were a bit rough/scratchy.
Malcolm worked at the front. He was extremely sweet and helpful, giving great recommendations on where to go and what to do. He was always very happy and looked like he loved his job, which most people dont look like.
Everyone on the staff was so friendly and sincere about it. They were always will yo help us figure out things to do and where to go. This will not b our last trip to this great hotel! And the ladies who did breakfast were great! Nothing! It was a great week. It is just a well worn place.
I like the fact that it was close to where I wanted to go easy to get around town. The only problem is that someone did call in the middle of the night trying to poach my credit card but they told me about that upon my arival. They've been having problems with someone messing with their customers.
Free hot breakfast, rooms were clean, on main streets so no walking on sketchy back roads late at night, bed was comfortable and pillows weren't those expensive fluffy pillows that are good for nothing, water pressure was great, shower was nice, staff was friendly, a/c worked great. No cons...
I like the fact that the hotel staff especially the Front Desk Manager Tashena Johnson helped me out when my credit card was compromised. She did the best she could to make my stay as comfortable as it should have been. The location was great. Not to far from everything attended. I didn't like the way my reservation was not in the system when I arrived and I didn't like the 1:00am phone call asking for authorization...
Very nice hotel! We had a beautiful corner room with a good amount of space and two comfortable double beds. Breakfast was basic, but great, and the staff was very nice. Clean and a great location! I only have one complaint -- I was frustrated that our towels were changed everyday, even if we hung them up. But otherwise, everything was great!
Location. Bed was comfortable. Was able to get early check in. air conditioner sounded like a jet Engine Taking off. Room lighting was terrible. Towels inconveniently placed in bathroom right above the only shelf/counter space.
The staff was very friendly. Valet parking was fast and very nice. They held our luggage after checkout so we could go to the Saints game which was fantastic. Price we paid for a single King Size bed was sort of outrageous
The helped helped secure my motorcycle in a safe place during my stay. It meant a lot to me!
simply superb, nice visual, great staff, very comfortable, nearby the points of interest. ...and a great summer deal for the rooms nothing...but the parking was a bit awkward, even with the valet. but not terrible
I'd say the biggest con for me personally was the lack of a fitness room, staff could have been a bit more welcoming, I didn't find the customer service to be the best--but the room was nice enough and the location was great-overall an okay experience.
Location was perfect and extremely easy to get to anything and everything. The non-windowed closet... oops... room was tucked away... next to the stairs exit. Extremely noisy. The room was dirty, the toilet stopped up, the bathroom had mold in the shower and mildew on the wall (inside and out of the shower). We only had lukewarm water the entire visit. Our visits to NOLA have us in our rooms very little durring our stays... still want a clean room with hot water. Things will have to change a lot for me to ever stay there again. With all this negativity spoken I must say the staff was nice and very helpful.
Location was great. Walking distance from the quarter. Quite street. Parking was quite easy.
Great location! Great staff! Great little boutique hotel. Beds are wonderful! Wish there was a fridge in our room, but otherwise I highly recommend this fantastic quiet little gem! ,Great location! Great staff! Great little boutique hotel. Beds are wonderful! Wish there was a fridge in our room, but otherwise I highly recommend this fantastic quiet little gem! A touch pricy but so worth it! A touch pricy but so worth it!
Good price. Bed was comfortable. Room was clean. Not many amenities
Ms. Kenya at the front desk made our trip very wonderful with her service and smile. We like to thank her for her hospitality.
This is a small old hotel that is very charming and in a great location. Close to the French Quarter and Riverwalk. Tiny rooms. My room took 5 - 10 minutes to get hot water running.
The location kept us a block or two away from the late night crazy of the French Quarter while still close enough that we could walk to nearly anything. It was also 1 block from the cable cars so we could go farther afield if we wanted to. The restaurant downstairs was really popular with locals and there was always a line. Not a real negative, because it was tasty, just a 'heads up!'
The room is too small and has no window.
Wonderful historic hotel. We chose a small interior room as we never planned to spend much time in the room. Without windows though, it was easy to oversleep so I recommend setting an alarm. The bed was comfortable. The room had everything we needed: iron, coffee, refrigerator, toiletries and blow dryer. Leftovers in the fridge from previous guest. No bar in the hotel - we knew that going in but we found ourselves saying that it would have been nice.
Friendly staff. Clean room. Great location.
The hotel was clean, comfortable, and convenient. The front door opens to the back door or a nearby hotel's trash collection site.
Great location. Small, dated room. Constant noise from Neighbors and some mechanical work or failing equipment.
The rooms were clean, rooms comfortable, location great, and the staff were accommodating. There was no fridge in the room, and free wifi was only on the lobby.
Best staff ever!!! Very good location. One of the safest hotels in NOLA. ***** stars!
large rooms, view of river, lighted pool, nice lobby, locations not crazy about wifi in room.. took fee off the bill but was confusing.
Lobby was excellent. Open and spacious with good food and service. Great for watching games and spending time with a large group. Small room
The staff were very friendly and helpful. Made us feel special. The rooms were nice and the new beds were the most comfortable I have experience in any hotel. The only complaint is they need to put more outlets in the room. I would stay at the Hotel Marriott again.
Great location. Close to everything in the French Quarter. Friendly and helpful staff
Perfect location to explore new orleans The elevators were terrible. Waited up to 10 minutes for the cars to show up each time!
It does maintain the Marriott standards The hallways are noisy at night
I thought the staff was very helpful and attentive at all times. The location was great. We enjoyed our stay! Thanks!
Room was nice and comfortable, looked to be recently remodeled. Nothing is included. I had to pay extra to park, extra for the wifi and extra for the breakfast. If I had known this I definitely would have not stayed here. Staff seemed very busy and did not have time to answer any questions that you might have.
Ran out of eggs and bacon during breckfast one day.
The morning breakfast is the best we have had in a hotel that features "free breakfast" our room had no window and one night we were inundated with cigarette smoke from unknown sources
Breakfast good, comfy beds Maid didn't leave shampoo, etc in our room , but in our othet parties room she did.
Good proximity for walking or riding bus or trolley to most attractions. Friendly and courteous staff. Breakfast each morning saved us restaurant money. Room was small but adequate. King mattress was very comfortable. I asked to have the toilet seat tightened (upon arrival it was very loosely attached and sliding back and forth). It was not done. Bathroom floor always felt a bit sticky. No exhaust fan in bathroom (or not working?). Carpet looked and felt a bit worn.
Coffee & breakfast was disappointing compared to other free breakfasts
Location in French Quarter No bathroom exhaust fans. Very difficult to get in and out of a king sized bed crammed in such a small room. Breakfast was very cramped, unorganized, poor tasting food, and had rude staff. For the price, this hotel sucks. I don't plan on returning.
Like that it was walking distance from French quarter but far enough to stay out of the riff raft. Free breakfast left us wanting more.
Location and staff were awesome. Lobby area very appealing and interesting. Helpful, knowledgeable staff. Breakfast was crowded and could have used more staff to keep things clean and stocked . Noise from lobby echoes throughout entire building.
Hotel was in walking distance to museums, French Quarter and other attractions. Courteous, helpful, knowledgeable and friendly staff. A large variety of items were available for breakfast. Rooms were clean and attractive.
The rooms and common areas are beautiful. The staff was very attentive. Great breakfast. You can't open the window. so the only ventilation is the heating/cooling system.
The staff went out of their way to take care of us. The rooms are nice and well kept. Overall it was a wonderful stay.
It was close to every event I was attending that weekend. The staff was very friendly. Check-in and out was also great no long waits.
Location, beds were very comfortable, clean rooms Had no hot water in the shower and the staff was not very helpful to remedy the issue. Hallways were very noisy and it seemed like a door was always slamming. Parking was expensive (40/night)
Close to French Quarter. Very expensive for the quality of the room, our windows were facing a wall, the room was located on the third floor. The front desk had poor customer service.
Loved this hotel! Wish we would've booked all 4 nights here! The only reason we stayed here Saturday night was because the Sheraton on Bourbon didn't have a room available. We had booked the Sheraton sun through weds and then decided we were going to New Orleans Saturday also. Needless to say, will stay here anytime I go to New Orleans! AWESOME hotel! Beds are very comfortable and the bathroom was huge! And this hotel is well within walking distance of the French Quarter! Staff is very friendly!
The room was spacious (we chose space over views) and the beds were comfortable. Very clean and the maid service was excellent - my colleague's wallet fell out of her bag inside the room as we rushed out to dinner and the maid put it on the center of the bed so we could see it immediately when we got back. The room was quiet (on the top floor) and the location is an easy walk to the French Quarter. Tried to order room service and couldn't get through to either the number in the menu or the number on the phone (which were different). After half an hour, called the front desk and told them the issue; they said they would call the restaurant manager and have her call my room directly. That took another half an hour and then the order I got was wrong. Didn't have time to call and correct it, so I paid $35 for the wrong breakfast and went outside the hotel the rest of the trip. Should have realized when there wasn't a pre-order form to place on the door that ordering breakfast in might not be a regular routine? When checking out, I asked for a copy of the bill showing the total paid with a zero remaining balance, which I need for travel reimbursements at work. Was told I would need to get that through the booking service (I used Kayak, which I find dependable). I was able to convince the person checking me out that I needed a hotel bill that showed I do not owe any balance, but this shouldn't require so much time and explanation - don't people stay here frequently enough for business that staff understand the standard documentation process? As a frequent traveler, I haven't had this issue anywhere else with a rating above 3 stars.
The staff was great at the doubletree. We arrived about 12:15pm and check in was at 3pm, but they accomadated us right away! The bell men and valet staff were wonderful with helping the bags and calling cabs right away. The Wow cafe served great food and the customer service there was wondeful as well.Rooms were clean and comfortable.Overall if you want great customer service I recommend this hotel! When I visit New Orleans again I will definetly be staying at this hotel.
Good Location, nice room and comfortable bed. Friendly staff. I'd stay there again!
Delay in getting towels when calling Response time was greater than 30 minutes
Good location. Close enough to walk to the French Quarter but far enough away to get out of the craziness and noise. Right on St. Charles streetcar line- very convenient. Very large room and bathroom. Very clean. Great bed. Good towels. Would definitely stay here again! Expensive but then it is New Orleans! Price was pretty much on par with other hotels of the same type. Huge bathroom but almost nowhere to hang towels. Another towel rack or a few more hooks would have been nice and there was plenty of room for them.
LOCATION Asked for wash rags twice. Even went down to front deak in person. Never got them.
restaurant room cleanliness nothing
Location was convenient, it is walking distance to the French quarter. Staff was friendly, room was clean. Parking is pricey. It is across the street and it is $25 for 24hrs. Beds were really small. Bathroom was also small.
location, near the congress centre
We enjoyed staying at the Omni. Very comfortable beds, courteous staff. Hotel is located away from all the hustle and bustle but still within walking distance of everything. There was an outlet center right across the street which was great too.
Comfort and near all I was disappointed when I was not given comp. Breakfast for the 3 nights I stayed
I thoroughly enjoyed my first trip to New Orleans, and our lodging was a big part of it. The room was clean, very comfortable bed. All of the staff was very helpful, the concierge gave us many tips.
comfortable bed no complimentary internet access in business center and no complimentary coffee in the morning
The beds and bedding. The quality of the breakfast. The fact that the restaurant didn't open till 7:00 am. The monring we ate there, it opened at 7:05 and we didn't get out of there till 7:45, which made us late for our meetings. Most business people want to get in and out for breakfast and are not very concerned about a gormet experience. The should open by at least 6:30 am.
drink machine not cooled-hot drinks
Very close to convention center and Harrah's Casino. Excellent location for business. Room service not very effective. Hotel restaurant staff not efficient enough(they act slow).
The hotel was clean with comfortable rooms with a good location to walk to various sites around New Orleans. No open restaurant, complimentary coffee in the lobby you pay for, despite their advertisment they are not attached to the casino to name a few.
Great hospitality
When we arrived door service was great but the front desk lady was very disrespectful. We arrived a couple hours early before our original check in time at 3 and it seemed like she was bothered by a previous incident. No eye contact and we could barely hear her speak because she spoke so low. The overall stay was mediocre, the last night fire alarms continued to go off through out the night making it extremely hard to get a good rest.
I really like the proximity to shopping, restaurants, and the aquarium. The restaurant was closed
The Westin is located on the riverfront, about a four or five block walk from the heart of the French Quarter. We loved the extra walk back and forth to meet friends given all the food indulges in NOLA. Staff was fabulous.
nice location. rooms were clean and no musty odor(its new Orleans) ended up booking through a 3rd party to get room, not a normal process. they did well however.
Hotel was overbooked! Never experienced anything like this before! Will never book online again! Horrible experience. Could not stay at this hotel!
Worse staff at any hotel I have ever stayed. I have stayed at hotels around the world & staff at this hotel in New Orleans is by far worse in the world. Desperate need for professional staff training!
When we travel to New Orleans, we stay at the Westin. It is a great location. We can walk to whatever we want to do or take the trolley. That we couldn't stay longer this time.
the beds were very comfortable no
our room have city view instead of magnificient river view that is a very big inconvenient as we were faced close buildings in front of us. the staff was not at all flexible to change our room even with my Gold card preffered Guest.
I have always stayed here but this time the services was so bad !! They couldn't find my reservation and the stuff was rude
Staff was awesome. They were always helpful and super nice. Great customer service. Perfect location to most everything we wanted to see. Strange smell in room. Not bad but not good either. Could have used a room freshener. The bathroom is a bit small. We kept hitting the wall with the door each time we opened it.
Initially we had a problem with our reservation and had to spend the night at a neighboring hotel. The hotel staff more than accommodated us in the end. We had to call the corporate office to get our situation resolved
Room was excellent and very comfortable view was spectacular I was ticked right off at the $48 parking charge. I likely won't be back. I would rather this information be included right up front when booking.
There isn't self parking, valet only I upgraded my stay to include free Breakfast but wasn't worth it
Very poor insulation between rooms. We had to move from our first room, as it sounded like our neighbors were inside our room. In our second room we backed into the elevators and heard that constantly, but it was better than loud voices.
Overall the hotel is clean and the service is what you would expect. Food offering was very mediocre or non-existent. I have never seen a 50-story hotel that did not have a dinner restaurant. At the end Of the day there is only the food in the bar....no menu except the bar menu which is very limited. The 2d floor dining for lunch and breakfast was only mediocre.
The decor and view Smell of the towels were like smoke
Where able to check in early and get our room. Very friendly staff
I love the location and the luxury part of the hotel. The expensive parking.
The hotel is in a great location and the lobby is nice The hotel was overbooked the first night. They told us upon check in that our room would be ready in about 20 mins as it was being cleaned. It wasn't ready until midnight. The room we had reserved was a double room, they ended up giving us a king room that had been smoked in by the prior guests (there were still ashes in the bathtub). We asked if they could send up a cot - which never arrived. Luckily the second night they switched our rooms. Overall we were pretty disappointed.
They gave us a King rm instead of a double that we booked , we had 3kids with us. No double rms available so they upgraded us to a suite and gave us roll aways for the kids. Room was gorgeous,49th floor with wall of windows (amazing view of city and river) plus gave us a $100 in house credit. Totally made up for their mistake. Hotel and location was great. Parking was $43 per nt
All in all, the hotel was nice. Location was excellent to convention center, bourbon street, and loads of other shopping. Great bed linens, but flimsy face wash clothes and towels compared to other hotels I've stayed in. Bathroom tub was dirty. Couldn't take a soak bath. Shower only.
Close to convention center and the French Quarter Pretty basic in all aspects
The suite was very spacious and good for kiddos. The stuff was very accommodating and brought USA crib and extra sheets. The location is ideal about a 10 minute walk to Bourbon street and 15 minute walk to Aquarium, river walk and Jackson Square. There are many great restarunts very close. The only thing we did not like was the couch/pull-out couch. It was not super comfortable but that is a minor detail. Just throw the kiddos on it!
I beds are comfortable and the location is walking distance from everything the front desk lady was a little unprofessional.
location Street noise No restaurant
We had a place to sleep Very noisy outside. The water quit working for a while. Good thing we weren't to dirty from partying before. Out of the French quarter. But close.
Access to downtown . Offsite parking was a mess. You have to wait too long to receive your vehicle when you want to go somewhere.
It was conveniently close to the French Quarter
The location was close to all attractions we wanted to visit whie in New Orleans. Had trouble upon check-in with the reservation..staff could not find the second room I booked until I phone customer service at booking.com. No refridgerator was in the room as was stated when I made the reservation. Took 4 phone calls to the front desk to get clean towels on the second night of our stay.
Great location Theft of items from my briefcase no in-room safe
My stay was terrible! I checked out after thirty minutes
The location was great! I will definitely use this site in the near future
Its in front Of The Harras Casino And Walking distance from every were in downtown room is poorly isolated and hear all the noise neighbors
staff, a/c did not work, had to repeat requests to staff many times to get anything done.
good location accessible to french quarter, canal and many sites Parking atrocious, charge for internet, facilities (lobby, restaurant and others) minimal, rooms adequate, staff not real visible, but helpful when requested
Nice location, staff was nice Room kinda small, fellow travelers had a long wait for room
location the air conditioner could not get adjusted I was cold all night
The staff was very, very nice and helpful. We got many coupons and great suggestion on where to eat and go out. There was some updates/construction going on in the hotel. Bathroom was very small.


text:
Brace yourselves for the year of the Superstar. With the 45th Anniversary well underway, the 2.0 Foundation Pack gives the beloved silhouette a few more simplistic touches of flair. Gold printed tongues and touches as well as color variation to the stripes allow the Superstar to remain nostalgic and minimal but still desirable. The Superstar first emerged on the scene as a basketball shoe with a distinct shell top in 1969. In 1983, a rap group you may have heard of set the Superstar to become a symbol of the streets. Priced at $75 and available at Adidas, this collection is a great way to commemorate the original icon.
Swipe to page through gallery.
Click arrows or click & drag to page through gallery.


text:
Wooden Alarm Clock Thermometer
A Sleek Alarm Clock and Thermometer Made From Fine Wood
Make your room more elegant with this digital alarm clock and thermometer made from a smooth wood finish.
With different LED light colors to choose from, waking up will never be a bummer again!
Diameter: 180 mm
Length: 180 mm
Screen Type: LED
Width: 60 mm
Display Type: Digital
Shape: Rectangular
Form: Single Face
Material: Wood
Backlight?: Yes
Weight: 250 g
Functions: Calendar, Clock, Alarm, Thermometer, Sound Control
Powered by: USB Cable, 4 x AAA 1.5V Battery ( not included )
Package weight: 0.295 kg
Product size (L x W x H) : 15 x 4 x 7 cm / 5.90 x 1.57 x 2.75 inches
Package Contents: Unit, User Manual


text:
Good 'n Plenty Pennsylvania Dutch Shoo-Fly Pie
Total Time
Prep 10 mins
Cook 30 mins
Truly one of my favorite desserts ever! This recipe comes from the AMAZING Good 'N Plenty Family Restaurant in the heart of Lancaster County, PA. Bar none, my favorite restaurant ANYWHERE. (And I get around!) Try this, and prepare to be amazed by the delicious, gooey/crumbly, SWEET richness! One of the characteristics of a traditional Shoo-Fly pie is a crumbly, messy, almost floury crust on top...I understand that all tastes are different, and for that, I'm sorry you and DH didn't like it, Sistah. :(
Ingredients Nutrition
- 1⁄2 teaspoon baking soda
- 3⁄4 cup water, boiling
- 1⁄2 cup dark molasses
- 1 egg, beaten
- 3⁄4 cup flour
- 3 tablespoons shortening
- 1⁄2 cup brown sugar
- 1⁄2 teaspoon salt
- 1⁄2 teaspoon cinnamon
- 1 (9 inch) unbaked pie shells
- Preheat oven to 350ºF.
- Liquid:.
- Dissolve baking soda in water.
- Stir in molasses and one beaten egg (take care not to scramble the egg, tempering it is advised.).
- Crumbs:.
- Mix flour, shortening, brown sugar, salt and cinnamon.
- Form the mixture into crumbs.
- Pour the liquid mixture in an unbaked pie shell, then add the crumbs to the top and bake for 30 minutes.
Most Helpful
Made this pie after having a serious craving for Good N' Plenty's Shoo Fly Pie! I live in NY so just making my way over to Lancaster wasn't the most feasible idea.
This pie tastes almost exactly like the pie I remember!! Even served it with ice cream, made it so much better.
The only difference was that I used 1tsp of Vanilla extract, since I kept reading that this pie was too bitter or had a funny taste. The only way I would change this pie in the future would be to maybe bake it with a different crust, something like graham or maybe even chocolate.
This is what shoo fly pie is supposed to taste like. I think maybe modern tastes are used to simpler tasting sweeteners rather than the complex taste of molasses, such as corn syrup and refined white sugar. I remember eating at the Good n Plenty with my family when I was little -- we always had shoo fly pie and ice cream for dessert. This is the real deal, thanks for posting!
This the same recipe I have served my husband for many years. My recipe came from a booklet I bought at the Good 'N Plenty Family Restaurant! This is not a sweet pie and is a bit like liver - either you adore it (like my DH) or you don't (me). My problem is an allergy to the molasses. This is the only pie I make that my DH goes back for a 2nd piece and a glass of milk at bedtime. Good find GoodMorningBurger!


text:
Daniel Sturridge and Theo Walcott were absent from England's final training session this morning ahead of tomorrow night's World Cup qualifier against Ukraine at Wembley.
The duo trained yesterday but complained of feeling unwell overnight and did
not participate in the session at Arsenal's London Colney training complex.
It left head coach Roy Hodgson with only 18 players to be put through their
paces after the withdrawal yesterday of defender John Terry with an ankle


text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
June 15, 1961
BEGLINv.BALAZICK, APPELLANT.
Appeal, No. 219, April T., 1960, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Greene County, June T., 1958, No. 29, in case of Blair T. Beglin et ux. v. Charles Balazick et al. order reversed.
W. Robert Thompson, with him Thompson and Baily, for appellant.
R. Wallace Maxwell, for appellees.
Before Ervin, Wright, Wooeside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (rhodes, P.j., absent).
[ 195 Pa. Super. Page 496]
This is an action to quiet title to a triangular tract of land composed primarily of an old State highway. See Pa. Rules of Civil Procedure 1061-1066.
Helen Balazick has title to a lot in Jefferson Township, Greene County, with a frontage of 120 feet and a depth of 180 feet on which is erected a hotel. When she purchased it on July 13, 1943, it fronted on a road known as Legislative Route No. 30051. Plans for relocating the road had been signed by the Governor November 17, 1942. Thereafter, the Commonwealth constructed an improved highway according to the above
[ 195 Pa. Super. Page 497]
plan. After the new road was constructed, the Secretary of Highways, with the approval of the Governor, declared the old road vacated.
The new and old roads separate about 100 feet north of the hotel property and merge again about 200 feet south of it. At no place are the two roads more than approximately 50 feet apart. The new road is 50 feet to 75 feet from the front of the Balazick property. The only access to the new road from the Balazick property is over the old road. The highway department plans for the construction of the new road show that a ramp was to be constructed directly in front of the Balazick property providing access to the new highway. I was never constructed, and a six or seven foot embankment makes access to the new highway impossible at any place directly in front of the Balazick property.
After the construction of the new highway and the action of the secretary on the abandonment of the old highway in 1946, Mrs. Balazick and numerous people who came to her premises continued to use the old highway to get to and from her property. In 1957, Blair T. Beglin and Margaret Beglin, his wife, plaintiffs in this action, placed fence posts across the road. Balazick tore them down.
The Beglins then brought this action to quiet title to a triangular tract of approximately one-tenth of an acre composed largely of the old road in front of the Balazick and adjoining properties. The Beglins purchased the land from the Emerald Land Company for $125 on April 19, 1957. The Beglin triangular tract starts at the north corner of the Balazick lot and the old road. From there its border line passes through the old road in a northerly direction for 100 feet to the right of way of the new road; then along the edge of the new road in a southeasterly direction 252 feet (which extends for the entire distance that the Balazick property faces it); thence 164 feet in a northwesterly
[ 195 Pa. Super. Page 498]
direction back to the northern corner of the Balazick lot. Most of the tract is composed of the old road. If Balazick is denied the right to use this part of the old road, entrance to part of her premises is impossible, and if the owner of the premises to the south were to assume a position similar to the plaintiffs, her premises would be completely surrounded without any access to the new highway.
The plaintiffs contend that the title to the land occupied by the old road within the triangle reverted to the Emerald Land Company because it was abandoned by the Secretary of Highways as a public highway, and that the company having conveyed its interest in the tract to them, they have good title.
The court below agreed, and Helen Balazick appealed, contending the road was not abandoned.
The legal procedure to abandon a highway has varied depending upon the statute under which the action was taken. The action of the Secretary of Highways, which the plaintiffs contend resulted in the vacation of the old road along the Balazick premises, was taken in January 1946, and was subject to the State Highway Law of June 1, 1945, P.L. 1242, which provides in § 210 as follows: "The secretary is hereby empowered to change, alter, or establish the width, lines, location, or guards of any State highway or any intersecting road in such manner as, in his discretion, may seem best, ... Where the new route, in the judgment of the secretary, supplies and takes the place of any part of the old highway, and such part is of a length of not more than two miles, the secretary, being of the opinion that such part is unnecessary for public use and travel, or burdensome or dangerous, and, having due regard for the convenience of access to the new highway by the owners of property abutting on such part, may, at any time, by written order, declare such part to be vacated. Thereafter the part so vacated shall be
[ 195 Pa. Super. Page 499]
Before the secretary had authority to abandon the old road, he was compelled by the legislature to give "due regard for the convenience of access to the new highway by the owners of property abutting" on the old highway. Here there was no consideration of "convenience of access" to the new highway by Balazick. Vacating the road left no access. Thus, under the facts of this case, the secretary could have given no regard to the convenience of access by Balazick. This constituted an evident abuse of discretion by the secretary. Furthermore, the secretary was acting upon a plan of relocation which showed a ramp from the new road in front of the Balazick property. The ramp (which was over the triangular lot now claimed by the plaintiffs) was never constructed. Instead the old road was not actually "closed to public use and travel," as provided in the above quoted statutory provision, but it has been used and travelled up to the present time without question except by the plaintiffs. Furthermore, the record indicates that all of the owners of property adjoining the old road received notice of the vacating of the old road except Helen Balazick.
No one of these circumstances may warrant a holding in this proceeding that the part of the old road connecting the Balazick premises with the new road was not properly vacated, but together, they justify such holding. She had no notice of the vacating of the old road. Even were it legally vacated, it was not in fact vacated. The secretary did not give due regard for the convenience of access to the new highway when he provided for no access whatever. We are of the opinion that the plaintiffs do not have a title to the old road which permits them to deny others the use of it.
MONTGOMERY, J., would affirm on the opinion of Judge HOOK for the court below.
Order reversed.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Special Order
You have until Feb 1, 2017 to return or exchange items purchased between Nov 1, 2016 and Jan 1, 2017.
All other standard return policy conditions apply.
Shown in Use
Shown in Use
Shown in Use
Shown in Use
Show MoreLess
Now Viewing:
Product Highlights
Desk Color: TeakBlack Oak
Special Order
Not available with current selections
You Pay: $363.99
The 48" Crank Adjustable Stand-Up Desk from Luxor is a sit-to-stand adjustable crank desk designed to help you achieve a healthier lifestyle. This desk can be used for desktop, laptop, or tablet computing, and is equipped with furniture-grade casters for mobility.
|Steel frame
|Powder coat paint
|Desk Surface Dimensions
|47.25 x 29.50" (120.0 x 74.9 cm)
|Desk Height
|Adjustable: 29.00 to 42.75" (73.7 to 108.4 cm)
4 x 3" furniture grade casters
2 x locking breaks
|95.0 lb (43.1 kg)
|Packaging Info
|Package Weight
|100.0 lb
|Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
|52.0 x 35.0 x 12.0"


text:
8 Things You Didn't Know About Independence Hall
This 4th of July before you light off those fireworks, learn just a little bit about America's birthday. Independence Hall is one of the most iconic buildings in America and has quite a history that most of us know little about. Many people will vaguely recognize the building as having something to do with the American Revolution, but not much more than that. Here are eight facts about Independence Hall that you probably didn't know, but will give […] Read on →


text:
Author: Anne Henochowicz
Anne Henochowicz is the Translations Editor at China Digital Times. Her writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Review of Books, The Postcolonialist, and Foreign Policy. She is an alumna of the Penn Kemble Democracy Forum Fellowship at the National Endowment for Democracy. Before tracking Chinese social media, Anne studied Inner Mongolian folk music at the University of Cambridge and The Ohio State University. Her master's thesis on folk music and Mongolian identity is available here.
Censorship Vault: Student Falls to Death on Guangdong University Campus
Censorship Vault features previously untranslated propaganda instructions from the archives of the CDT series Directives from the Ministry of Truth (真理部指令). Guangdong Provincial Party Committee Propaganda Department: As for the matter of a female graduate student falling to her death at the southern end of the Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
November 21, 2013 12:00 AM
Word of the Week: Eye-field
目田 (mù tián) eye-field If two small strokes are added to the top of each of these characters, they become 自由 (zìyóu), "freedom." The term was originated by players of the immensely popular online role-playing game World of Warcraft (WoW). In the summer of 2010, gamers were dismayed to learn that many words
November 20, 2013 12:00 PM
Most Recent Entries
- 2013.11.20 Netizen Voices: Chinese Dream, Military's Dream
- 2013.11.19 Censorship Vault: Beijing Reporting on Lei Zhengfu
- 2013.11.19 Minitrue: Chongqing Re-education Through Labor
- 2013.11.19 Censorship Vault: Rumor of Deng Pufang Fleeing China
- 2013.11.18 Drawing the News: Third Plenum Reflections
- 2013.11.18 Censorship Vault: Guangdong Reporter Beaten in Shaanxi
- 2013.11.17 Minitrue: A Touch of Sin
- 2013.11.15 River Crabbed: How's My Chinese?
- 2013.11.15 Sensitive Words: Third Plenum Sit-Ins and More
- 2013.11.15 Censorship Vault: Reporter Beaten for Investigating Hunan Nail House
- 2013.11.14 Censorship Vault: High School Food Poisoning
- 2013.11.14 Netizen Voices: Self-Criticism My Chrysanthemum!
- 2013.11.13 Word of the Week: Monkey-snake
- 2013.11.13 Netizen Voices: "Comrade" Left in the Cold
- 2013.11.13 Censorship Vault: Seaside Villa
- 2013.11.12 River Crabbed: Nice Day for a Red Wedding
- 2013.11.12 These Smoggy Days Are Yours and Mine
- 2013.11.12 Censorship Vault: Attack in Hotan, Xinjiang
- 2013.11.12 Minitrue: Liquid Ammonia Explosion in Xinjiang
- 2013.11.11 Netizen Voices: "Imaginary" Internet Company's IPO
- 2013.11.11 Censorship Vault: Henan AIDS Villages
- 2013.11.08 Censorship Vault: Summer Sex Scandal
- 2013.11.07 Maintaining Stability at a Technical School
- 2013.11.07 Censorship Vault: Lychee Thieves
- 2013.11.07 Minitrue: Guangxi Shooting, Shanxi Explosions
- 2013.11.06 Word of the Week: Scale the Wall
- 2013.11.06 Censorship Vault: Turmoil in Turpan
- 2013.11.05 Censorship Vault: Miswriting Xi Jinping's Name
- 2013.11.05 Minitrue: Luo Changping May Win Integrity Award
- 2013.11.04 Drawing the News: Photoshop Failure and More
- 2013.11.04 Censorship Vault: Pharmaceutical Fraud
- 2013.11.01 HK Actor Declares Love of Starbucks, Country
- 2013.11.01 Chinese Dreaming in the Ivory Tower
- 2013.11.01 Censorship Vault: The Lai Changxing Case
- 2013.10.31 Censorship Vault: Sit-In Over Pork
- 2013.10.30 Censorship Vault: Attack at Harbin Hospital
- 2013.10.30 Minitrue: Chen Yongzhou Admits Accepting Bribes
- 2013.10.30 Quote of the Week: "Ma de" in China
- 2013.10.30 Minitrue: Jeep Crash in Tiananmen Square
- 2013.10.29 River Crabbed: Protests and Confessions
- 2013.10.29 Alleged Leaked Document on Tiananmen Car Crash
- 2013.10.29 Censorship Vault: Car Explodes in Qingdao
- 2013.10.28 Minitrue: "Personal Injury" at Forbidden City
- 2013.10.25 Minitrue: Do Not Report on Guo Feixiong
- 2013.10.25 Drawing the News: Strange Creatures from Cathay
- 2013.10.24 Netizen Voices: "Living Lei Feng" Fauns Over Xi
- 2013.10.24 Censorship Vault: Two Sessions Public Opinion Guidance
- 2013.10.24 Minitrue: Do Not Report on Chen Yongzhou's Arrest
- 2013.10.24 A Song for Xia Junfeng's Father
- 2013.10.23 Minitrue: Chen Yongzhou, Housing Bubble, Bo Xilai
- 2013.10.23 Quote of the Week: "Irresponsible Remarks"
- 2013.10.22 Drawing the News: Rebel Pepper, Xia Yeliang
- 2013.10.18 Ministry of Truth: Yuyao, Clinton, Cartoon Xi
- 2013.10.17 River Crabbed: A World Without Weibo
- 2013.10.17 Ministry of Truth: "Mass Petitioning" After Flood
- 2013.10.16 Paper of the Week: Muddled Sh*t Times
- 2013.10.16 Ministry of Truth: Revolutionary Spirit
- 2013.10.16 Sensitive Words: Riot in Yuyao After Flood


text:
You have searched for shivkumar
in the news | LAST UPDATED : 10 Feb 2016, 14:02 IST
- I am glad my son is not a photocopy of me: Pandit Shivkumar Sharma
He slides the hammers along the strings of the santoor with poise, and then pauses before he transcends from alaap to the compositions — one more velvety than the other. Alternating between twangy notes and mild staccato peals, his music ripples like leaves in a summer breeze — much like the alluring intricacies of the valley of Kashmir. For decades, Pandit Shivkumar Sharma has mesmerized the lovers of Indian classical music, and he continues to do so. The finale of the three-day Times Hindustani Music Festival saw the santoor virtuoso leaving the audience rapt with his repertoire. Bangalore Times indulged in a quick conversation with the legend minutes before he took the stage. Excerpts: Improvizing on the santoor… Although commonly perceived as a folk instrument from Jammu and Kashmir, the santoor has more influence of the Sufi traditions. Over the years, I have improvized on the hammered dulcimer, fine tuning it to suit my raags and compositions as well as giving it a distinct character, a language and a musical idiom. What you see now is a more elaborate version of the musical device, which has attracted global attention. From the gentle tunes to the dramatic crescendos, its music has the power to create a spiritual bliss for the performer as well as the listener. Will we be treated to the Shiv-Hari magic once again? Not likely any time soon. Pandit Hariprasad Chaurasia and I have composed music together for a number of memorable films by legends like BR Chopra. For us, it was more about crafting melodious poetic notes that can transcend through generations without losing its allure. Now, thanks to advances in technology and modern equipment, the scenario has changed. A lot of experimental music is taking place, which is also good, but somewhere, maybe, we are losing out on the content and depth of storyline. Do you think folk instruments of India need further revival? More than the instrument, music depends on the person who plays it. It depends on the artist how he or she can bring out the best in an instrument, prove it to be important and take it to the forefront. Online tutorials can be helpful, but there can be no short cuts to learning an art form. Nothing can be better than picking up the nuances from a guru. Performing with Rahul Sharma… Sharing the stage with my son is an interesting experience. I am glad he is not a photocopy of me. His approach to play the santoor is a lot different than mine, but that's a good thing, I guess. We have created exclusive music on the same musical device. Cuisine gharanas… I have been performing in Bengaluru for three decades. The best thing about the audience here is that they are familiar with different kinds of music. Other than that, I like to taste the local delicacies every time I am performing in the city. Like music, cuisines also have different gharanas. For instance, the Rava Dosa in Karnataka is different from that of Andhra Pradesh and Kerala. My favourite is the one they serve in Bengaluru. Also, I like the typical South Indian thaali — it's sumptuous.


text:
Euro Truck Simulator 2 is the eagerly awaited Euro Truck spin-off. It highlights enhanced representation, and permits you to go around a huge determination of focal Europe's parkways. Euro Truck Simulator 2 is continually being upgraded with more vehicles and changes to truck taking care of and material science, making it always sensible. There is likewise a devoted group of …Read More »
Home / Babar Baig (page 78)
Babar Baig
JI HUZOORI – Download Indian 720p Video HD Song
Listen & Download Ji Huzoori hd song from bollywood movie (KI & KA) Arjun Kapoor, Kareen Kapoor, Indian New song Ji Huzoori 720p hd Video Released 2016 directed by R. Balki. Ji Huzoori Song is composed by Mithoon. Ji Huzoori Song Lyrics: Meri har khushi mein ho teri kushi / Mohabbat mein aisa zaruri nahi / Mohabbat hai yeh ji huzoori …Read More »


text:
RockScape® Arch
Model Number: 7080
The 2' RockScape Arch Climber is the perfect height for younger children to climb up, over or under. Like all of our RockScape climbers, the 2' Arch is constructed of durable, recyclable plastic and features smooth plastic edges that make them a comfortable climbing experience.
Features and Benefits
- Rock climbers constructed of durable, recyclable plastic materials
- Smooth edges are more comfortable than natural boulders
- Affordable option for adding rock climbing activities to your playground
Color Options
Additional Information
Rocks available in all rock plastic colors


text:
7119 Foster Street, District Heights MD, 20747
Rented Price:
4 beds , 2 Full baths
Status: Sold
Listing Provided Courtesy Of: Tristar Realty Inc
Real Living At Home
Last Updated: 12/9/2016 9:26 PM
Description for 7119 Foster Street District Heights, MD 20747
Hardwood floors, updated kitchen and baths, fireplace, and remote alarm. Renovated and painted with new roof. Move-in Ready!
Sold Price:
Sold Date:12/17/2015
District Heights
2 Full
Closed Rental
Hardwood floors, updated kitchen and baths, fireplace, and remote alarm. Renovated and painted with new roof. Move-in Ready!
Listing Information
District Heights
Public Water Service
Public Sewer
Room Information
Dining Room - L Shaped
Interior Features
Gas Heat, Central
Unfinished Basement
Attic Storage
Exterior / Lot Features
Street Parking
Driving Directions
Kipling Pkwy to Right on Mason and Right on Foster.
Listing Price History
District Heights Real Estate
District Heights is located in Maryland. District Heights, Maryland 20747 has a population of 5,870.
The median household income in District Heights, Maryland 20747 is $66,650. The median household income for the surrounding county is $73,568 compared to the national median of $53,046. The median age of people living in District Heights 20747 is 39.8 years.
Loading nearby sales and history ...
Ask a Question?
Start a no spam email conversation
My Drive Time
Enter your work address to view actual drive times with traffic for this property
Here is the weekday INRIX Drive Time from this property to .
When you register, you will receive ...
Weekday drive times
Plus all these great features
Register or login today to take advantage of Drive Time
Nearby homes for sale
Recent sales nearby
District Heights Real Estate
Nearby Communities


text:
About |
Policies |
Contact |
Las Vegas
Call Us: 1-800-318-2220
Providence, RI
Syracuse, NY
Piscataway, NJ
Allentown, PA
Hartford, CT
Wilkes Barre, PA
Newark, NJ
New York, NY
Amherst, MA
Omaha, NE
Chestnut Hill, MA
Cincinnati, OH
Utica, NY
Washington, DC
Indianapolis, IN
Milwaukee, WI
Rosemont, IL
South Bend, IN
Burlington, VT
Boston, MA
University Park, PA
Philadelphia, PA
New Haven, CT
Hamilton, ONT
Villanova, PA
Lexington, KY
Bangor, ME
Chicago, IL
Storrs Mansfield, CT
Denver, CO
Lowell, MA
Hershey, PA
Binghamton, NY
Jamaica, NY
Bridgeport, CT
Bronx, NY
Los Angeles, CA
Albany, NY
Columbus, OH
Brooklyn, NY
Minneapolis, MN
Atlanta, GA
Iowa City, IA
Lincoln, NE
College Park, MD
Toronto, ONT
Pittsburgh, PA
Notre Dame, IN
Durham, NH
St. John's, NFL
Miami, FL
San Francisco, CA
San Diego, CA
Bloomington, IN
Madison, WI
Ann Arbor, MI
West Lafayette, IN
Evanston, IL
Memphis, TN
Louisville, KY
Clemson, SC
Blacksburg, VA
Stony Brook, NY
Austin, TX
Buffalo, NY
East Lansing, MI
Kingston, RI
Knoxville, TN
Fairfax, VA
Tampa, FL
Orlando, FL
Dallas, TX
Tulsa, OK
Chapel Hill, NC
Raleigh, NC
Princeton, NJ
Saint Cloud, MN
Mississauga, ONT
Halifax, NOV
Gander, NFL
Nepean, ONT
Manchester, NH
Las Vegas, NV
Oxford, OH
Uncasville, CT
Champaign, IL
Tempe, AZ
Boulder, CO
Cambridge, MA
Davidson, NC
Tuscaloosa, AL
Gainesville, FL
Athens, GA
Nashville, TN
College Station, TX
Oxford, MS
Mississippi State, MS
Columbia, MO
University Of Richmond, VA
Saint Bonaventure, NY
St. Louis, MO
Richmond, VA
Greenville, NC
Houston, TX
Durham, NC
Tallahassee, FL
Winston Salem, NC
Ithaca, NY
Baton Rouge, LA
Troy, NY
Hamden, CT
Newark, DE
Towson, MD
Terre Haute, IN
Waco, TX
Rochester, NY
Brandon, MAN
Winnipeg, MAN
Regina, SAS
Saskatoon, SAS
Calgary, ALB
Medicine Hat, ALB
Trail, BC
Abbotsford, BC
Kelowna, BC
Kamloops, BC
Campbell River, BC
Victoria, BC
New Westminster, BC
Vancouver, BC
Cranbrook, BC
Lethbridge, ALB
Red Deer, ALB
Edmonton, ALB
Lloydminster, ALB
Thunder Bay, ONT
North Bay, ONT
Kitchener, ONT
Chatham, ONT
Windsor, ONT
Sarnia, ONT
Oshawa, ONT
Kingston, ONT
Peterborough, ONT
Brockville, ONT
Corner Brook, NFL
Stephenville, NFL
Saint John, NWB
Charlottetown, PEI
Fredericton, NWB
Montreal, QUE
Cornwall, ONT
Belleville, ONT
Red Bank, NJ
Basketball - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Hockey - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Hockey - AHL
Children / Family
Wrestling - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Football - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Baseball - College (Div I-A and Div I-AA)
Syracuse Orange
Syracuse Orange Basketball
Boston University Terriers
Boston University Terriers Basketball
Georgetown Hoyas Basketball
Georgetown Hoyas
Eastern Michigan Eagles
Eastern Michigan Eagles Basketball
St. Johns Red Storm
St. Johns Red Storm Basketball
Cornell Big Red Basketball
Cornell Big Red
Boston College Eagles Basketball
Boston College Eagles
Miami Hurricanes
Miami Hurricanes Basketball
Pittsburgh Panthers
Pittsburgh Panthers Basketball
Virginia Tech Hokies Basketball
Virginia Tech Hokies
North Carolina Tar Heels Basketball
North Carolina Tar Heels
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Notre Dame Fighting Irish Basketball
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
Wake Forest Demon Deacons Basketball
Florida State Seminoles Basketball
Florida State Seminoles
North Carolina State Wolfpack Basketball
North Carolina State Wolfpack
Virginia Cavaliers
Virginia Cavaliers Basketball
Clemson Tigers
Clemson Tigers Basketball
Louisville Cardinals
Louisville Cardinals Basketball
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Basketball
Duke Blue Devils Basketball
Duke Blue Devils
LSU Tigers Football
Syracuse Orange Football
LSU Tigers
Hershey Bears
Wilkes-Barre Scranton Penguins
Bridgeport Sound Tigers
Hartford Wolf Pack
Rochester Americans
Springfield Thunderbirds
Providence Bruins
Binghamton Senators
Toronto Marlies
Syracuse Crunch
Lehigh Valley Phantoms
Utica Comets
St. John's IceCaps
Albany Devils
Rutgers Scarlet Knights Basketball
Stony Brook Seawolves
Stony Brook Seawolves Basketball
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Rutgers Scarlet Knights Women's Basketball
Seton Hall Pirates
Seton Hall Pirates Women's Basketball
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights Basketball
Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
Temple Owls
Temple Owls Women's Basketball
Penn State Nittany Lions
Fordham Rams Basketball
Penn State Nittany Lions Basketball
Fordham Rams
Seton Hall Pirates Basketball
Wisconsin Badgers Basketball
Wisconsin Badgers
Michigan Wolverines Women's Basketball
Michigan Wolverines
Penn State Lady Lions
Penn State Lady Lions Women's Basketball
Penn State Nittany Lions Women's Basketball
Michigan State Spartans
Michigan State Spartans Basketball
Wisconsin Badgers Women's Basketball
Illinois Fighting Illini
Illinois Fighting Illini Wrestling
Rutgers Scarlet Knights Wrestling
Iowa Hawkeyes Basketball
Iowa Hawkeyes
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Nebraska Cornhuskers Women's Basketball
Northwestern Wildcats Basketball
Northwestern Wildcats
Penn State Nittany Lions Wrestling
Michigan State Spartans Women's Basketball
Indiana Hoosiers
Indiana Hoosiers Basketball
Iowa Hawkeyes Women's Basketball
Oregon State Beavers Wrestling
Oregon State Beavers
Nebraska Cornhuskers Basketball
Purdue Boilermakers
Purdue Boilermakers Wrestling
Maryland Terrapins Women's Basketball
Maryland Terrapins
Maryland Terrapins Basketball
Northwestern Wildcats Women's Basketball
Indiana Hoosiers Wrestling
Indiana Hoosiers Women's Basketball
Ohio State Buckeyes Basketball
Ohio State Buckeyes
Minnesota Golden Gophers
Minnesota Golden Gophers Basketball
Northwestern Wildcats Wrestling
Purdue Boilermakers Basketball
Purdue Boilermakers Women's Basketball
Michigan Wolverines Basketball
Ohio State Buckeyes Women's Basketball
Illinois Fighting Illini Basketball
Rutgers Scarlet Knights Football
Morgan State Bears Football
Morgan State Bears
Eastern Michigan Eagles Football
Nebraska Cornhuskers Football
Ohio State Buckeyes Football
Purdue Boilermakers Football
Michigan Wolverines Football
Penn State Nittany Lions Football
Michigan State Spartans Football
UConn Huskies
UMass Minutemen
UMass Minutemen Hockey
UConn Huskies Hockey
UConn Huskies Basketball
North Florida Ospreys
North Florida Ospreys Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Huskies Women's Basketball
Auburn Tigers Basketball
Auburn Tigers
Houston Cougars
Houston Cougars Basketball
Tulsa Golden Hurricane Basketball
Tulsa Golden Hurricane
UCF Knights
UCF Knights Women's Basketball
East Carolina Pirates
East Carolina Pirates Basketball
Memphis Tigers Basketball
Memphis Tigers
Yale Bulldogs
Yale Bulldogs Hockey
UCF Knights Basketball
South Florida Bulls Basketball
South Florida Bulls
Temple Owls Basketball
Maine Black Bears Hockey
Maine Black Bears
Southern Methodist (SMU) Mustangs Women's Basketball
Southern Methodist (SMU) Mustangs
Southern Methodist (SMU) Mustangs Basketball
Vermont Catamounts Hockey
Vermont Catamounts
Tulane Green Wave Basketball
Tulane Green Wave
Boston College Eagles Hockey
Cincinnati Bearcats
Cincinnati Bearcats Basketball
Merrimack Warriors
Merrimack Warriors Hockey
Providence Friars
Providence Friars Hockey
South Carolina Gamecocks Basketball
South Carolina Gamecocks
Northeastern Huskies
Northeastern Huskies Hockey
Texas Longhorns Baseball
UConn Huskies Baseball
Texas Longhorns
New Hampshire Wildcats Hockey
New Hampshire Wildcats
South Florida Bulls Women's Basketball
Gautier Capucon
The Music of Sergei Prokofiev
The Music of Prokofiev
Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Romeo and Juliet - Classical
Michael Tilson Thomas
Gabriel Prokofiev
New York City Ballet
Volodymyr Sirenko
National Symphony Orchestra of Ukraine
Alexei Grynyuk
Colorado Symphony Orchestra
Andre deRiddler
Nadia Sirota
Esa-Pekka Salonen
The Rite of Spring
John Adams
Yo-Yo Ma
Darius Milhaud
Iris Orchestra
A Passion for Dance
Atlanta Symphony Orchestra
Nicholas McGegan
Lara St. John
Hamilton Philharmonic Orchestra
Gemma New
San Diego Symphony
Charles Dutoit
Yuja Wang
Gustavo Dudamel
Los Angeles Philharmonic
Grant Gershon
Los Angeles Master Chorale
San Francisco Symphony
Garrick Ohlsson
Rite Of Spring
Susanna Malkki
Trailer Park Boys
Home For The Holidays
Timothy Hankewich
A Hamilton Beatles Experience
Darcy Hepner
A Midsummer Night's Dream
Hofstra Pride
Hofstra Pride Basketball
Brooklyn Hoops Winter Festival
Kentucky Wildcats
LIU Brooklyn Blackbirds
Kentucky Wildcats Basketball
LIU Brooklyn Blackbirds Basketball
LIU Brooklyn Blackbirds Baseball
Baylor Bears
Baylor Bears Baseball
Bubble Guppies Live
New Jersey Symphony Orchestra
Peter And The Wolf
Harvard Crimson Basketball
Harvard Crimson
Hartford Hawks
Hartford Hawks Basketball
Under Armour Reunion
Sacred Heart Pioneers
Sacred Heart Pioneers Basketball
Oklahoma Sooners
Fairfield Stags
Fairfield Stags Basketball
Oklahoma Sooners Basketball
Birthday of Basketball
Providence Friars Basketball
Butler Bulldogs
Indiana State Sycamores Basketball
Butler Bulldogs Basketball
Indiana State Sycamores
Crossroads Classic
Vermont Catamounts Basketball
Villanova Wildcats Basketball
Villanova Wildcats
Creighton Bluejays
Creighton Bluejays Basketball
Xavier Musketeers
Xavier Musketeers Basketball
Marquette Golden Eagles
Marquette Golden Eagles Basketball
DePaul Blue Demons
DePaul Blue Demons Basketball
Longwood Lancers
Longwood Lancers Basketball
Oral Roberts Golden Eagles
Oral Roberts Golden Eagles Basketball
Arizona State Sun Devils Basketball
Arizona State Sun Devils
Truman State Bulldogs
Truman State Bulldogs Basketball
Denver Pioneers Hockey
Minnesota Duluth Bulldogs Hockey
Minnesota Duluth Bulldogs
Denver Pioneers
Arizona State Sun Devils Hockey
St. Cloud State Huskies Hockey
St. Cloud State Huskies
Nebraska-Omaha Mavericks Hockey
Nebraska-Omaha Mavericks
Colorado College Tigers Hockey
Colorado College Tigers
Miami (OH) Redhawks
Miami (OH) Redhawks Hockey
HoopHall Miami Invitational
La Salle Explorers Basketball
Chicago State Cougars Basketball
Chicago State Cougars
Southeast Missouri Redhawks Basketball
Southeast Missouri Redhawks
Central Connecticut State Blue Devils Basketball
Central Connecticut State Blue Devils
Richmond Spiders
Richmond Spiders Basketball
Davidson Wildcats
Davidson Wildcats Basketball
St. Bonaventure Bonnies Basketball
St. Bonaventure Bonnies
Virginia Commonwealth Rams
Virginia Commonwealth Rams Basketball
UMass Minutemen Basketball
Dayton Flyers Basketball
Dayton Flyers
St. Joseph's Hawks Basketball
St. Joseph's Hawks
La Salle Explorers
George Mason Patriots Basketball
George Mason Patriots
Rhode Island Rams
Rhode Island Rams Basketball
St. Louis Billikens
St. Louis Billikens Basketball
Duquesne Dukes Basketball
Duquesne Dukes
George Washington Colonials
George Washington Colonials Basketball
North Carolina Greensboro Spartans
North Carolina Greensboro Spartans Basketball
Delaware Blue Hens Basketball
Delaware Blue Hens
Drexel Dragons
Drexel Dragons Basketball
Towson Tigers Basketball
Towson Tigers
Ohio State Buckeyes Wrestling
Valparaiso Crusaders Basketball
Valparaiso Crusaders
CBS Sports Classic
UCLA Bruins Basketball
UCLA Bruins
Mississippi Rebels Basketball
Mississippi Rebels
Tennessee Lady Vols Basketball
Tennessee Lady Vols
Texas A&M Aggies Basketball
Texas A&M Aggies
Arkansas Razorbacks Basketball
Arkansas Razorbacks
Vanderbilt Commodores Basketball
Vanderbilt Commodores
Mississippi State Bulldogs
Mississippi State Bulldogs Basketball
Tennessee Volunteers Basketball
Tennessee Volunteers
Kansas Jayhawks Basketball
Kansas Jayhawks
Georgia Bulldogs Basketball
Georgia Bulldogs
Florida Gators
Florida Gators Basketball
LSU Tigers Basketball
Alabama Crimson Tide Basketball
Alabama Crimson Tide
Missouri Tigers Basketball
Missouri Tigers
Holy Cross Crusaders
Holy Cross Crusaders Basketball
Maine Black Bears Basketball
Buffalo Bulls
Buffalo Bulls Basketball
Columbia Lions Basketball
Columbia Lions
UMass Lowell River Hawks
UMass Lowell River Hawks Basketball
New Hampshire Wildcats Basketball
Albany Great Danes Basketball
Albany Great Danes
Binghamton Bearcats
Binghamton Bearcats Basketball
UMBC Retrievers
UMBC Retrievers Basketball
Boston University Terriers Hockey
St. Francis (PA) Red Flash
St. Francis (PA) Red Flash Basketball
Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Cougars Basketball
Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Cougars
Notre Dame Fighting Irish Hockey
UMass Lowell River Hawks Hockey
Alaska Fairbanks Nanooks Hockey
Alaska Fairbanks Nanooks
Michigan Tech Huskies
Michigan Tech Huskies Hockey
Iowa Hawkeyes Wrestling
Never Forget Tribute Classic
Morgan State Bears Basketball
Wagner Seahawks Basketball
Wagner Seahawks
Pacific Tigers
Pacific Tigers Basketball
North Carolina A&T Aggies Basketball
North Carolina A&T Aggies
Kennesaw State Owls
Kennesaw State Owls Basketball
Rider Broncos Basketball
Rider Broncos
Princeton Tigers Hockey
Princeton Tigers
Minnesota Golden Gophers Hockey
Mercyhurst Lakers Hockey
Mercyhurst Lakers
Mariucci Classic
Alabama-Huntsville Chargers Hockey
Alabama-Huntsville Chargers
Union College Dutchmen
Union College Dutchmen Hockey
Bentley Falcons Hockey
Bentley Falcons
St. Lawrence Saints
St. Lawrence Saints Hockey
American University Eagles
American University Eagles Basketball
Colorado Buffaloes
Colorado Buffaloes Basketball
Utah Utes
Utah Utes Basketball
Eastern Washington Eagles
Eastern Washington Eagles Basketball
Rensselaer Engineers
Rensselaer Engineers Hockey
Ottawa Gee Gees
Clarkson Golden Knights
Clarkson Golden Knights Hockey
Harvard Crimson Hockey
Brown Bears Hockey
Brown Bears
Quinnipiac Bobcats
Quinnipiac Bobcats Hockey
Cornell Big Red Hockey
Dartmouth Big Green
Dartmouth Big Green Hockey
Oops! We couldn't find exactly what you're looking for but we tried our best. Please try another search or look below for possible matches.
Newsletter Sign-up
Receive our latest exclusive offers and special deals
Company Information
About Us
Contact Us
Sell Tickets
Call Us: 1-800-318-2220
© Copyright Onlineseats-Ticket Broker 2016


text:
Exceptionally sculptured Kalinga Krishna idol is an art in bronze. According to legends Kalinga, the poisonous snake had occupied and poisoned the river Yamuna causing grave distress to the cowherds and the flora and fauna of Vrindavan. On hearing their plight, young Krishna jumped into the river and overpowered the vile serpent. If you are a lover of antiques, this finely crafted bronze idol will be value addition to your collection.
Saved by
For Inner peace and well being Please setup a place in your abode that you can dedicate to this ritual. If you have an altar, that is superb but if you don't, any place in your home where the ritual can be performed is good too. DAY OF WEEK: WEDNESDAY AND OR FRIDAY 1. Place the picture of statue of Kali at the Center. 2. To the left of the image, place the white candle and light it. 3. In the back or to the right, please light the incense. 4. Sit quietly and Think about your need for inner…