text:
Home /
Our Sources / About Us
/ FAQs /
Advanced Search
Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
September 23, 2011
CHERYL A. HARRIS, CO-ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RYAN D. MASETH, DECEASED, AND DOUGLAS MASETH, CO-ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RYAN D. MASETH, DECEASED,PLAINTIFFS,v.KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANT.
Presently before the Court are Defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.'s ("KBR") motion for reconsideration of the Court's June 17, 2011 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying its motion for the application of Iraqi law to this case (Docket No. 241) and Plaintiffs Cheryl A. Harris and Douglas Maseth's ("Plaintiffs") response thereto (Docket No. 244). KBR asserts that the Court committed numerous errors in resolving its motion for the application of Iraqi law, while Plaintiffs find no errors in the Court's discussion. (Docket Nos. 242, 244). Upon consideration of the parties' submissions and the relevant standard governing motions for reconsideration, and for the following reasons, KBR's motion [241] is denied.
II. BACKGROUND*fn1
This action arises out of the tragic death of Staff Sergeant Ryan D. Maseth, who was electrocuted while showering at a military base in Iraq. Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *1. His parents, who are administering his estate, brought this action against KBR, the private defense contractor that contracted with the United States Army to provide maintenance services at the base, alleging, among other things, that KBR's negligence in its performance or non-performance of certain maintenance services was the proximate cause of Staff Sergeant Maseth's death. Id. at *1-2.
Pertinent here, KBR filed a motion requesting that Iraqi law be applied to this case, citing three separate provisions of the Iraqi Civil Code. (Docket No. 215). After considering the parties' extensive briefing, evidentiary submissions and hearing oral argument from counsel at a motion hearing on April 5, 2011, the Court denied KBR's motion for the application of Iraqi law on June 17, 2011. Harris v. Kellogg, Brown and Root Services, Inc., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 2462486 (W.D.Pa. Jun. 17, 2011). In its decision, the Court denied KBR's motion on two, alternative bases, holding that: (1) KBR failed to meet its burden under Rule 44.1 to present evidence of the potentially applicable Iraqi law and to persuade the Court that such law should apply; and (2) after applying Pennsylvania choice of law rules, and weighing the interests of the potentially interested jurisdictions, Iraq, Pennsylvania, Texas and Tennessee, the proffered Iraqi laws would not be applied. Id. The Court also expressly reserved ruling as to which of the interested states' laws will apply to Plaintiffs' claims and KBR's defenses. Id. at *21.
Dissatisfied with the Court's decision, KBR filed the instant motion for reconsideration on July 1, 2011. (Docket No. 241). Along with its motion, KBR submitted a brief in support, a third affidavit from Professor Hamoudi and an amicus brief submitted by the Solicitor General's Office to the Supreme Court in Saleh et al. v. Titan Corp. et al. (Docket No. 242). KBR alleges that the Court committed numerous errors in its decision and also requested that the Court schedule oral argument on its motion. (Id.). Plaintiffs filed their brief in opposition to KBR's motion for reconsideration on July 11, 2011, opposing both reconsideration and the request for an additional hearing. (Docket No. 244). The Court denied KBR's request for a hearing on August 24, 2011 (Docket No. 245) and notified the parties that the motion would be submitted on the briefs. As all briefing has concluded, the motion is now ripe for disposition.
It is well settled that reconsideration of a prior order is only warranted if the moving party demonstrates: (1) an intervening change in the controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence which was not available when the court issued its order; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to prevent a manifest injustice. Max's Seafood Cafe by Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999) (citing North River Ins. Co. v. Cigna Reinsurance Co., 52 F.3d 1194, 1218 (3d Cir. 1995)); see also Bootay v. KBR, Inc., No. 10-4028, 2011 WL 2713804, at *5 (3d Cir. 2011) (noting same legal standard on a motion for reconsideration).
A party's mere disagreement with the Court does not translate into the type of clear error of law which justifies reconsideration of a ruling. Miller v. Lamas, 2011 WL 398408, at *1, Civ. Act. No. 10-51 (M.D.Pa. Feb. 2, 2011) (citing Dodge v. Susquehanna Univ ., 796 F.Supp. 829, 830 (M.D.Pa.1992)). Furthermore, "because federal courts have a strong interest in the finality of judgments, motions for reconsideration should be granted sparingly." Id. (quoting Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Indus., Inc., 884 F.Supp. 937, 943 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 27, 1995)). It is evident that a motion for reconsideration is not a tool to re-litigate and reargue issues which have already been considered and disposed of by the Court. Id. (citing Dodge, 796 F.Supp. at 830). Rather, such a motion is appropriate only where the court misunderstood a party or where there has been a significant change in law or facts since the Court originally ruled on that issue. Id. (citing Above the Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannon Roofing, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 99, 101 (E.D.Va. Sept. 1, 1983)).
In light of the aforementioned legal standard, the Court will first address the alleged changes in law and/or new evidence presented by KBR and will then discuss KBR's claims that the Court committed legal and factual errors.
A.Changes in Law / New Evidence
First, the Court finds that the two documents KBR has attached to its motion for reconsideration, i.e., the Solicitor General's Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae filed with the Supreme Court in Saleh et al. v. Titan Corp. et al., and a third affidavit from Professor Hamoudi, do not constitute new evidence or represent changes in the controlling law which would warrant reconsideration. (Docket Nos. 242-1, 242-2).
To this end, the Solicitor General's brief in the Saleh case was filed in May of 2011. (Docket No. 242-2). Thus, it was available prior to the Court's disposition of the motion for application of Iraqi law on June 17, 2011. Harris, 2011 WL 2462486. Although the brief is filed by the Solicitor General on behalf of the United States, it is not binding authority. It simply represents the position of that Office on behalf of the United States in the Saleh litigation. (See Docket No. 242-1). Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether the Supreme Court should grant a writ of certiorari and review the Saleh decision. (Id.). Therefore, the Solicitor General's brief constitutes neither a change in the law nor new evidence that was unavailable prior to the Court's disposition of the present motion.*fn2 See Max's Seafood Cafe by Lou-Ann, Inc., 176 F.3d at 677. Accordingly, KBR's motion for reconsideration is denied to the extent that it is based on the Solicitor General's brief.
A third affidavit from Professor Hamoudi is also now before the Court. (Docket No. 242-1). It contains further analysis of CPA Order 17, particularly section 18. (Id.). As the Court noted in the Opinion denying KBR's motion for the application of Iraqi law, Hamoudi's analysis of this section was absent from his first and second affidavits. Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *5, 7-8. But, from the Court's view, Hamoudi's analysis could have and should have been included given that the interpretation of section 18 was contested by the parties. Id. at *7-8. Hamoudi actually admits that he previously offered expert opinions in federal litigation about CPA Order 17 prior to his engagement in this case. (Docket No. 242-1). But, Hamoudi explains that he only offered his opinions regarding CPA Order 17 in his second affidavit in this case because he thought that it did not apply in any fashion. (Id.). Therefore, the evidence presented in the third affidavit is not "newly discovered" as it was available prior to the Court's disposition of the subject motion. See Max's Seafood Cafe, 176 F.3d at 677. For reasons left unstated, KBR and Hamoudi apparently decided not to include this information in their earlier submissions. As the evidence is not newly discovered, KBR's reliance on same does not support its motion for reconsideration.
The Court further notes that both KBR and Hamoudi appear to
misunderstand why the Court questioned his "credibility" in the
Opinion. (Docket Nos. 242, 242-1). It had nothing to do with his
qualifications, as they suggest. (Id.). His qualifications were
accepted by Plaintiffs and the Court. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486 at
n.1 ("Plaintiffs have not contested that Professor
Hamoudi is properly qualified as an expert in Iraqi law."). The Court
simply questioned why Hamoudi ignored CPA Order 17 in his initial
affidavit and then only addressed two of the three sections which were
raised by Plaintiffs in his second affidavit.*fn3
Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *7-8. Perhaps Hamoudi's opinions regarding
CPA Order 17 and section 18 were left out as a part of KBR's
litigation strategy? To this end, KBR argued in its first pleading in
this case, its Notice of Removal filed on April 22, 2008, that CPA
Order 17 was applicable and controlling in this case. (See Docket No.
1, Notice of Removal, ¶¶ 30, 38). *fn4 However,
despite these claims made at the outset of the litigation, KBR's
retained expert, Hamoudi, failed to address CPA Order 17, until he was
prompted to do so by the Plaintiffs. Indeed, Hamoudi was plainly aware
of CPA Order 17 given his significant experience with Iraqi law and
his work as an expert in other federal litigation specifically
addressing CPA Order 17. He even admitted in his second affidavit that
CPA Orders were a valid part of Iraqi law. (Docket No. 220--1 at ¶ 2).
As a consequence, the only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn
from these facts is that KBR's legal team and its expert witness made
deliberate choices to abandon KBR's earlier arguments which relied on
CPA Order 17 in favor of what they perceived to be a stronger argument
under the Iraqi Civil Code. From the Court's view, the expert's opinions are
therefore tainted by KBR's evolving litigation strategy*fn5
enough to question his "credibility" for not apprising the
Court of the full body of Iraqi law which was potentially applicable
in this case.*fn6
For these reasons, KBR's motion for reconsideration is denied to the extent that it has not sufficiently demonstrated any change in the applicable law or presented any new evidence which support reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Opinion. See Max's Seafood Cafe, 176 F.3d at 677.
B.Errors of Law / Fact
KBR next claims that the Court made a number of erroneous legal conclusions and factual findings during its analysis of whether Iraqi law should apply to this case. (Docket No. 242). Specifically, KBR challenges the Court's analysis of CPA Order 17, its application of Pennsylvania choice of law rules and essentially all other aspects of the Court's decision. Plaintiffs find no error with the Court's analysis. (Docket No. 244). From the Court's view, KBR "protests too much" and, for the following reasons, has not demonstrated that reconsideration of the Court's decision is warranted.
1. CPA Order 17
i. Improper Interpretation of the Court's Opinion
KBR asserts a number of arguments denigrating the Court's analysis of CPA Order 17. (Docket No. 242). Before addressing KBR's specific positions, the Court notes that KBR's arguments suggest that its counsel simply misreads the Court's June 17, 2011 Memorandum Opinion. The only relief that KBR requested in its motion was that three specific Iraqi legal principles should be applied in this case, i.e., those set forth in Articles 205, 207 and 211 of the Iraqi Civil Code. (Docket No. 215). As a result, the Court limited its holding to whether the three provisions of the Iraqi Civil Code cited by KBR applied to this litigation. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *1 ("In this Memorandum Opinion, the Court addresses the narrow question of whether Iraqi law should be applied to certain of Plaintiffs Cheryl Harris and Douglas Maseth's ("Plaintiffs") claims in this case, as requested by Defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. ("KBR")); Id. at *21 ("Based on the foregoing, KBR's motion to apply Iraqi is denied. The Court's holding is limited to this issue"). The Court concluded that these three provisions did not apply and then "expressly reserve[d] ruling as to which of the interested states' laws [will] apply to Plaintiffs' claims and KBR's defenses in this action going forward." Id. at 21.
KBR claims that the Court's reasoning offered in support of its holding is "internally inconsistent"*fn7 but fails to recognize that the Memorandum Opinion actually sets forth alternative rulings: (1) that KBR failed to meet its burden under Rule 44.1 to present the Court with applicable Iraqi law because KBR only presented the Court with Iraqi Civil Code provisions and failed to thoroughly address the relevant sections of CPA Order 17; and (2) that under a Pennsylvania choice of law analysis, the provisions of the Iraqi Civil Code proffered by KBR would not apply when compared with parallel provisions under the laws of Texas, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. (Docket No. 235). The Rule 44.1 issue was not raised by either party and was considered sua sponte. Although the Court found against KBR on the Rule 44.1 issue, the Court assumed that KBR had met its burden under Rule 44.1 and fully analyzed the choice of law issues under Pennsylvania law in the second portion of the Memorandum Opinion. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *9. As a consequence, KBR's protestations are without merit.
ii. CPA Order 17 is "Merely a Part of Iraqi Law" and cannot supplant Pennsylvania Choice of Law Rules
KBR further claims that the Court's analysis of CPA Order 17 ignored Pennsylvania choice of law rules. (Docket No. 242 at 2). However, KBR presented this identical argument in its Reply Brief, submitted before the Court's Memorandum Opinion was issued, as follows:
A. Coalition Provisional Authority Order 17
Does Not Preclude the Application of Iraqi Law to This Suit
Plaintiffs ask this Court to abandon Pennsylvania's well-settled choice-of-law framework based on a now-defunct order issued by the Coalition Provisional Authority ("CPA") in Iraq.
The CPA was the governing body established by Coalition forces following the invasion of Iraq. Plaintiffs boldly assert that CPA Order 17 bars this Court from performing any choice-of-law analysis under Pennsylvania law. See Pls.' Opp'n at 4 ("It may not even be necessary for this Court to proceed to a choice of law analysis under Pennsylvania law."). Plaintiffs' argument is fundamentally flawed.
1. CPA Order 17 Does Not Affect the Court's Analysis of Choice of Law
CPA Order 17 was a temporary order issued by a transitional authority whose sole purpose was to govern Iraq. As such, CPA Order 17 does not, and could not, require this Court to disregard Pennsylvania law. To the extent CPA Order 17 has any relevance here, the order would merely define the substance of potentially-applicable Iraqi law. In other words, as at least one other court has readily acknowledged, CPA Order 17 does not supplant a choice-of-law analysis; it merely informs the substance of one forum's law, after such analysis is performed. See Al Quraishi v. Nakhla, 728 F. Supp. 2d 702 (D. Md. 2010), appeal docketed, No. 10-1891 (4th Cir. Aug. 6, 2010) (performing choice-of-law analysis without regard to CPA Order 17, determining Iraqi law applied under Maryland's lex loci delecti rule, and declining to reach the issue of how CPA Order 17 might affect application of Iraqi law pending further discovery). (Docket No. 220 at 1-2). As this argument was presented to the Court and soundly rejected, it should not be reconsidered because parties are not permitted to use a motion for reconsideration to simply "re-litigate old matters." See Miller, 2011 WL 398408, at *1.
In any event, KBR's argument is misplaced. KBR had the burden to establish foreign law under Rule 44.1 which was independent of any choice of law analysis. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 44.1. As this Court recognized, Rule 44.1 places the burden on the parties to both present evidence of the foreign law and to persuade the Court that such foreign should be applied. Id. In its initial motion, KBR only requested that three specific Iraqi Civil Code provisions be applied. (Docket No. 215). Therefore, it was entirely appropriate and consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Third Circuit precedent for the Court to first consider whether KBR had met its burden to present Iraqi law before considering Pennsylvania choice of law rules. If KBR failed to meet its burden to present Iraqi law, the substance of Iraqi law would not be established and Pennsylvania choice of law rules would be applied, without consideration of any Iraqi laws. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *6-8. But, in this case, even though the Court found that Iraqi law (under its Civil Code) was not established by KBR, the Court assumed that it had met its burden and considered each of the provisions of the Iraqi Civil Code proffered by KBR in its choice of law analysis. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *9 ("Notwithstanding that the Court has concluded that KBR has failed to meet its burden under Rule 44.1, and KBR's motion fails on this basis alone, the Court will continue with its analysis of the remainder of the parties' arguments.").
In his third affidavit, Hamoudi finally offers his opinion regarding section 18 and posits that it is a choice of law provision rather than a provision of substantive law.*fn8 (Docket No. 242-1 at ¶ 7). Specifically, Hamoudi states, in pertinent part, that:
As for Section 18 of CPA Order 17, . the phrase "in a manner consistent with the Sending State's laws, regulations and procedures" merely refers to the self-evident (and hardly worth noting) proposition that the court in the relevant state will apply its own choice of law rules and its own public policy limitations to determine which law should apply. (Docket No. 242-1 at ¶ 7 (emphasis added)). This is exactly how the Court proceeded in the second half of the Memorandum Opinion, which undermines KBR's argument to the contrary.
KBR next complains that the Court erred by not applying CPA Order 17 in its choice of law analysis but fails to mention how the Court's analysis under Pennsylvania choice of law rules would be any different if CPA Order 17 was considered in the second portion of the Court's decision. (Docket No. 242). Again, the Court's interpretation of CPA Order 17 is that the laws of the sending states, rather than Iraqi laws, apply to personal injury claims for death. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486. Based on this interpretation, the Court would apply Pennsylvania choice of law rules to determine the applicable substantive law. If Iraqi law was not considered, the Court would then analyze the laws of Texas, Pennsylvania and Tennessee in its choice of law analysis. Instead of proceeding in this regard, the Court assumed that KBR had met its burden under Rule 44.1 and analyzed whether the laws of Iraq, Texas, Pennsylvania or Tennessee should be applied. It appears that KBR simply disagrees with the Court's conclusion that Pennsylvania choice of law rules do not dictate that Iraqi law should be applied. See Miller, 2011 WL 398408, at *1 ("A party's mere disagreement with the Court does not translate into the type of clear error of law which justifies reconsideration of a ruling."). And, as discussed below, the Court does not find that KBR has met its burden to demonstrate that reconsideration of this aspect of the Court's holding is warranted.
iii. The Court held that KBR is immune
In yet another challenge to the Court's analysis of CPA Order 17, KBR suggests that the Court held that it is immune under Iraqi law and states that the Court should dismiss the case on this basis. (Docket No. 242 at 4, n. 1). To the extent that KBR makes such suggestion, the Court does not agree. To the contrary, the Court finds that CPA Order 17 provides only that government contractors such as KBR are "immune from Iraqi legal process" and does not provide any immunity from the present lawsuit. (Docket No. 218-2 at § 4.3 ("Contractors shall be immune from Iraqi legal process with respect to acts performed by them pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Contract or any sub-contract thereto.")). Therefore, the Court will not dismiss this case on this basis.
2. The Court Engaged in a Flawed Choice of Law Analysis
KBR also contests the Court's choice of law analysis, arguing that the Court erred in its balancing of the interests between the potential jurisdictions. (Docket No. 242). It argues that the Court misapplied the facts and gave improper weight to certain of the facts of this case. (Id.). The Court again disagrees.
i. The Court Failed to Consider the Interests of Iraq
KBR contends that the Court failed to consider the interests of Iraq. (Id.). However, in this Court's estimation, KBR conflates two separate issues: (1) the interests of the jurisdiction in the application of its law, which focuses on the policies underlying the legislation of the interested jurisdiction; with (2) the factual circumstances of the present case before the Court. On this first point, as the Court clearly noted in its earlier decision, KBR did not present the Court with any specific policy reasons supporting the proffered Iraqi causation law in this case. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *11, 15. Instead, KBR only generally stated that Iraq has an inherent interest in applying its law to wrongful conduct that occurred within its borders.*fn9 Id. KBR's motion could have been denied on this basis alone because it presented the Court with no policy reason why the causation law at issue was developed, i.e., what was Iraq's interest in applying that particular law to the facts of this case. However, the Court assumed that the policy underlying the causation law was to protect the second negligent actor and analyzed the arguments with this policy in mind. Id. at *15. Without the Court's assumption, KBR's motion for the application of Iraqi law could have been summarily denied.
Turning to KBR's present arguments regarding the Court's consideration of Iraq's interests, the Court finds that all of KBR's contentions were previously presented in conjunction with their initial motion. (See Docket Nos. 220 at 8; 229 at 2). KBR's own filing demonstrates that its position as to these facts has already been considered. Specifically, KBR argues now that:
[f]or example, the Opinion does not address the following facts demonstrating that it was not a "chance occurrence" that the facts underlying this case took place in Iraq: (1) the accident occurred in a hardstand building, LSF-1, that was constructed by Iraqis prior to the military invasion; (2) LSF-1 has continuously been owned by the Iraqi Government, including at the time of the incident; (3)
LSF-1 was used by soldiers who were training Iraqi security forces, and these Iraqi security forces were housed nearby, also within the LSF area; (4) LSF-1 was wired- without grounding- by Iraqis; and (5) LSF-1 will be returned to the Iraqi Government after the military withdraws from the RPC. See Reply in Supp. of KBRSI's Mot. at 8; Suppl. Br. in Supp. of KBRSI's Mot. at 2. (Docket No. 242 at 8 (emphasis added)). The Court dedicated several pages of its Memorandum Opinion analyzing Iraq's interests in this case and a fair reading of the discussion demonstrates that all of these facts were considered. Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *9-17. Indeed, the Court specifically noted, among other things, that "[b]ased on the prior arguments that have been presented to the Court in this case, the Court understands that KBR's position in this litigation is that the Army was allegedly negligent in its decisions and actions related to housing soldiers in Iraqi buildings with known substandard electrical systems. By advancing the causation law under the Iraqi Civil Code, KBR argues that if that law were applied, the Army's negligence would subsume its own negligence, if any." Id. at *15.
In addition, KBR has repeatedly interjected the first four facts it raises now into this litigation. (Docket No. 20, KBR's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss; Docket No. 35, KBR's Reply Brief; Docket No. 122, KBR's Supplemental Brief). However, before filing its motion for the application of Iraqi law, KBR has always taken the position that the United States' involvement at the RPC and LSF-1 far outweighed any interests of the Iraqis. Id. Indeed, KBR has continually argued that the United States controlled its conduct in relation to the LOGCAP III contract and KBR's provision of maintenance services to the military at the base. (See, e.g., Docket No. 35 at 5 (noting "the all-encompassing envelope of military direction and control that surrounded KBRSI's maintenance efforts at RPC."). KBR has also raised numerous defenses to this litigation which arise under the United States' Constitution, statutes and Rules. (See Docket No. 217, KBR's Answer to Amended Complaint).*fn10 Also, the fifth fact, that LSF-1 will be returned to the Iraqi government after the military withdraws from Iraq, has yet to occur and has no real bearing on the activities on the base at the time of the incident underlying this lawsuit, January 2, 2008.
To reiterate, from this Court's view, the United States' interests in
this litigation far outweigh the supposed interests of Iraq raised by
KBR. While Iraq may have initially erected the buildings*fn11
in question during the reign of Sadam Hussein, the United
States went to war against Iraq, and successfully invaded that
country. As a result, Iraq's government was displaced by the Coalition
Provisional Authority, an interim government which was run by a joint
coalition of nations, headed by the United States. The United States
then engaged KBR and other contractors to provide certain services to
the military during the occupation. In some cases, like
in Saleh, the government contractors were engaged to provide military
support and those contractors effectively acted as soldiers. See n.2,
supra. In others, as here, KBR provided routine electrical maintenance
services with no real connection to the military operation, except, as
KBR points out, for the fact that the services were provided on a
military base on foreign soil. However, KBR's multi-million dollar
"contracts with the Army, including the LOGCAP III base contract and
Task Order 139 at issue here, make no reference to Iraqi law or Iraqi
standards for construction, electrical work or plumbing
services."*fn12 (See e.g., LOGCAP III contract; LOGCAP
III Contract, Statement of Work; Task Order 139); see also Harris, 618
F.Supp.2d at 403-415 (describing the contracts at issue). Iraq was not
a party to the contracts between KBR and the military and Iraq had no
control over the United States, KBR, or the contractual relationship
between them. (Id.). In fact, pursuant to the contracts, KBR inspected
the facilities and performed certain maintenance services at the base
and at all times reported to the military and the Defense Contract
Management Agency -- not to Iraq.
Further, this Court remains convinced that CPA Order 17 wholly undermines any tangential interest that Iraq may have had in its laws applying to government contractors such as KBR during the time in question. To this end, "Order 17 expressly provides that such contracts may be awarded in accordance with the laws of the United States. CPA Order 17, § 4.1. Order 17 also states that government contractors were: not subject to Iraqi laws or regulations in relation to the terms and conditions of their contracts; immune from Iraqi legal process; and that certain claims by third parties should be dealt with in accordance with the laws of the United States. CPA Order 17, §§ 4.2, 4.3, 18."*fn13 Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *18. This conviction is particularly appropriate given that the third parties who were allegedly injured in this case by KBR were American (indeed an American serviceman and his parents) rather than Iraqis -- who arguably may have expected Iraqi law to apply.
In sum, as the Court previously held, Iraq's negligible interests in this case are far outweighed by those of the United States and the controlling law of the United States will be applied, i.e., the relevant contract and tort law in one of the interested jurisdictions, Pennsylvania, Tennessee or Texas.
ii. The Court Gave Improper Weight to Plaintiffs' State of Residence and Failed to Appropriately Consider the Interests of Texas
KBR also argues that the Court improperly weighed the interests of Pennsylvania and Texas. (Docket No. 242). However, the Court expressly held that it would revisit its conflicts of laws analysis as to the interested states, including Texas, Pennsylvania and Tennessee, at a later date. See Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *21 ("Based on the foregoing, KBR's motion to apply Iraqi is denied. The Court's holding is limited to this issue and the Court expressly reserves ruling as to which of the interested states' laws apply to Plaintiffs' claims and KBR's defenses in this action going forward."). Therefore, KBR will be given the opportunity to further address its position as to the applicable laws. But, for clarity, the Court will briefly consider KBR's positions set forth in its motion for reconsideration.
As to the Court's consideration of Pennsylvania's interests, KBR contends that "[b]y looking to the place where the effects of an injury are felt, the Court gave improper weight to the factor of the Plaintiffs' state of residence, and thereby committed legal error. See Blakesley v. Wolford, 789 F.2d 236, 241 (3d Cir. 1986) (‗In all personal injury actions, the effects of an injury necessarily follow a plaintiff to his or her state of residence . . . looking to the place where the effects of an injury will be felt gives improper additional weight to the factor of the plaintiff's state of residence')." The Court disagrees that any such error was committed.
First, KBR relied on Blakesley in its initial briefing and the Court was not persuaded by this argument at the time. (See Docket No. 216). As a consequence, KBR again misuses a motion for reconsideration to re-litigate old matters. See Miller, 2011 WL 398408, at *1.
Second, in this Court's opinion, Blakesly is distinguishable and not controlling in this case. Blakesley was a medical malpractice action. Blakesley, 789 F.2d at 236. The plaintiff in Blakesly was a Pennsylvania resident who was allegedly injured during a medical procedure performed on him in Texas, by a Texas doctor. Id. at 236-38. There, the Court of Appeals found error with the district court's reliance on the fact that the effects of the plaintiff's injuries followed him to Pennsylvania when he returned here. Id. In contrast, Staff Sergeant Maseth was killed instantly in Iraq and did not return to Pennsylvania. Indeed, KBR takes the position that Staff Sergeant Maseth was a resident of Tennessee rather than Pennsylvania at the time of his death. (See Docket Nos. 220; 226 at 3). So, Pennsylvania's interest in this case is not based on Staff Sergeant Maseth's former residency in the Commonwealth. Instead, Pennsylvania's interest is tied to the claims advanced by Staff Sergeant Maseth's estate which include claims asserted on behalf of his parents -- the named plaintiffs -- who are and always were in Pennsylvania. (Docket No. 209). Because they were always in Pennsylvania, their alleged injuries and resultant damages stemming from their wrongful death claims necessarily occur here. As a consequence, the location of his parents' injuries and damages was properly considered.
KBR further maintains that the Court failed to consider the interests of Texas regarding the causation issue. (Docket No. 242). Specifically, KBR argues that Texas law is not "pro- plaintiff" as the Court states in its Memorandum Opinion and that the Court's holding runs counter to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 33.004. (Id.). However, KBR again misunderstands the Court's ruling.*fn14
To this end, KBR requested that three specific provisions of the Iraqi Civil Code should be applied to this case in its motion for the application of Iraqi law. (Docket Nos. 215, 216). With respect to the causation law proffered by KBR, the Court held the following:
Under Iraqi law, a second negligent party will not be held responsible if "one of the causes is the result of the other" or, stated differently, "where there are two negligent acts, one built upon and the product of another, the second negligent act is ‗drowned out' by the first, and is no longer considered a cause of harm." (Id. at ¶¶ 38--40). In his reports, Professor Hamoudi does not provide a precise opinion as to the policy underlying this principle of law. (See Docket No. 216--1). However, the logical reason for such a policy is to protect the second actor from liability where the harm to the plaintiff would have occurred without any action (or, presumably, inaction) by the second actor. Assuming this is the stated policy reason for the law; Iraqi law protects subsequent defendants from being subject to damages in such situations but also places the full burden to compensate the plaintiff for the harm caused on the initial negligent actor.
Harris, 2011 WL 2452486, at *11 (footnote omitted). The only aspect of Texas law upon which the Court commented as "pro-plaintiff" was the "instant causation issue" -- i.e., whether the Court should apply the Iraqi Civil Code section described above, that a second negligent actor has no liability. Id. at *17. None of the potentially interested states, Texas, Pennsylvania or Tennessee, apply such a law. Id. In particular, the Court found that Texas employs a form of comparative negligence. See id. at * 13 (citing TX.CIV.PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 33.001, 33.003).
As the Court recognized, the proffered Iraqi causation law is pro-defendant. If the Court would apply it (and the Court will not) it would curtail this litigation given KBR's argument that Staff Sergeant Maseth's death and injuries were caused by the United States' (or the Army's) actions and not its own. In this Court's opinion, all of the interested states have pro-plaintiff laws when compared to the cited Iraqi Civil Code provision. When read in the proper context, there is nothing erroneous about the Court's statement.
In addition, the law which is now cited by KBR, Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code 33.004, was never raised in its initial briefing. (Docket Nos. 215, 216, 220, 229). By virtue of the Court's Order expressly reserving the parties' respective rights to litigate which of the states' laws apply, KBR will be given another opportunity to argue that Texas law, including Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code § 33.004, should be applied at the appropriate time. However, reconsideration of the prior order is not warranted on this basis at this time.
3. The Court Relied on Erroneous Statements of Fact
KBR also maintains that the Court relied on an erroneous finding of fact in support of its decision, i.e., that "[t]he evidence previously presented to the Court suggests that KBR fixed the actual water pump on more than one occasion and was aware that it had caused other soldiers to be shocked in the same shower where Staff Sergeant Maseth was killed. See Harris, 618 F.Supp.2d at 413-14." Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *15 (emphasis added). As recognized by the citation above, this statement is supported by the Court's Memorandum Opinion denying KBR's motion to dismiss, wherein the Court found that:
After the February 10, 2007 TI was completed, several service order requests were made to KBR regarding maintenance issues at the LSF-B 1 building. Some of these are relevant to the instant case. Specifically, Sergeant First Class Justin Hummer was housed in the same living quarters as Staff Sergeant Maseth at the RPC immediately prior to Staff Sergeant Maseth. (Docket No. 28-2 at 8). He lived at LSF-B1 from June 2007 to October 2007. (Id.). SFC Hummer was shocked four to five times while using the shower in the same restroom in which the electrocution of Staff Sergeant Maseth occurred. (Id.). SFC Hummer testified that each time he was shocked, a service order request was filled out and presented to the Mayor's Cell. (Hummer Deposition 8/21/08, Defendant's Exhibit 3 to 8/27/08 Motion Hearing ("Hummer Deposition ") at 67). KBR representatives responded to each of these requests and completed the maintenance services. (Id. at 67-68). During these maintenance calls, KBR inspected the water pump on the roof of LSF-B 1, replaced a pressure switch on the water pump and replaced a heating coil on the water tank. (Docket No. 28-2 at 9).FN15 SFC Hummer also testified that after the work was completed, the shocking events subsided for some time. (Id. at 68).
FN 15 Plaintiffs also maintain that KBR installed the water pump in question, relying on an email communication from Amber Wojnar, A SAC, MNF-1 Slayer to Plaintiffs. (Docket No. 121-8). That email states that "[a] Filipino plumber admitted to installing the pump on the roof during the previous KBR project in 2006. So, it was in fact conducted during KBR's time at RPC, and was not a bi-product of Iraqi engineering as previously alleged." (Id.).
Harris, 618 F.Supp.2d at 413-14 (emphasis added). In opposition to the present motion, Plaintiffs advance additional evidence in support of the Court's statement of facts, including the Office of Inspector General, Department of Defense Report on Staff Sergeant Maseth's death, which stated that:
We determined that KBR installed the pump on the roof which contributed to the electrocution of SSG Maseth, as well as adjacent water tanks during the first week of June 2006. We reached that determination based on KBR work order documents, interviews with four LSF-1 occupants and a KBR subcontracted plumber and photographs of LSF-1. (Docket No. 244 at 7 (quoting DOD-IG Report, p. 3 (emphasis added by Plaintiffs)).
In light of the foregoing, the Court still believes that its recitation of the evidence is supported by the extensive record in this case. In any event, the Court only noted that the evidence "suggests" that KBR fixed the water pump and was aware of shocking incidents. Harris, 2011 WL 2462486, at *15. The Court recognizes that KBR continues to deny these facts but KBR has offered no hard evidence which refutes the Court's earlier holding or the statement in the DOD-IG's report. (See Docket Nos. 242, 242-1, 242-2). Therefore, KBR has failed to demonstrate to this Court that it committed any factual errors and its motion for reconsideration is denied to the extent that it relies on such arguments.
4. KBR's Request to Hold Off Ruling on Motion Until After Discovery
KBR further notes that the Court should have held off ruling on the choice of law issue until after discovery. (Docket No. 242). In this Court's estimation, this claim is disingenuous and runs counter to its attorneys' multiple requests for early presentation and disposition of this motion, as detailed below.
Upon remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, this Court ordered the parties to file a joint discovery plan. (Docket No. 195). In response to this Order, the parties filed separate plans and KBR stated in its plan that it "intends to file a motion regarding choice-of-law at an early stage in the discovery period so that, to the extent the applicable law demonstrates that discovery regarding the merits of particular claims asserted by Plaintiffs is warranted, the parties can tailor their discovery efforts as appropriate." (Docket No. 197 at ¶ 13). Regarding this request, the Court and counsel engaged in the following exchange during the second session of the case management conference on November 23, 2010:
MR. LUCIANA: We did raise in our Rule 26 report, Your Honor, that we anticipate a motion relating to the applicable law.
THE COURT: Right. We've seen that.
MR. LUCIANA: The way we understand the conflict of law principles, it's very possible that Iraqi law applies here. So, we would like to brief the Court on that point.
THE COURT: Okay. So, when are you going to do that?
MR. LUCIANA: I would have to confer with my team. But sooner rather than later.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. LUCIANA: So, if you -- we would anticipate or we could, as a goal, shoot for sixty days for that which would coincide with the written discovery period.
THE COURT: Okay. And then, Mr. Cavanaugh and company, how long is it going to take you to respond to that? Thirty days? Sixty days?
MR. CAVANAUGH: Thirty's fine.
THE COURT: Once you've each briefed the issue, if either one of you want argument, it's as simple as e-mailing Mr. Kravetz or Mr. Galovich and we'll get you in to argue those. . (Docket No. 200 at 38-39 (emphasis added)).
Subsequent to the conference, the Court ordered that "any motion by Defendant regarding the choice of law issue shall be filed by 1/28/11 and any response to same by Plaintiffs shall be filed by 2/28/11. Further briefing will be permitted with leave of Court only and oral argument will be scheduled upon the request of the parties." (Docket No. 198). KBR then requested a continuance of said deadline, which the Court granted, and filed its motion, supporting brief and expert affidavit on February 4, 2011. (Docket No. 215, 216). Plaintiffs responded to KBR's motion and KBR then filed a reply brief and a supplemental expert affidavit. (Docket No. 221). Oral argument was held at KBR's request on April 5, 2011. (Docket Nos. 223, 226). At the end of the April 5, 2011 hearing, the Court advised that: "[o]nce again, this presents a very interesting issue. As I said, we've already spent substantial time in looking at this. Once we get the briefing, I would hope that we would be able to render a decision in 30 days or less." (Docket No. 226 at 71-72). No objections were raised to the Court's self-imposed deadline.
Supplemental briefing was submitted by the parties on April 27, 2011 and May 5, 2011, respectively. (Docket No. 229, 231). The Court issued its Opinion on June 17, 2011, approximately 45 days after the matter was fully briefed.
In sum, KBR's request to hold off resolution of its motion for the application of Iraqi law flies in the face of the procedural history of the present motion and the fact that the disposition of the motion was expedited pursuant to KBR's request. Therefore, to the extent that KBR seeks reconsideration of the timing of the Court's decision, said motion is likewise denied.
Based on the foregoing, KBR's motion for reconsideration [241] is DENIED. The Court's prior ruling that Iraqi law will not be applied to this litigation stands. An appropriate Order follows.
Nora Barry Fischer United States District Judge
cc/ecf: All counsel of record
Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.
Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.
Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.
LRC, Inc. About Us


text:
Villa in Hisaronu, Fethiye-Olu Deniz, Aegean Region, Turkey - Relax At Your Own Bbq And Pool During The Day And Walk Down To Bars, Night Clubs And Restaurants
Quality large 3 bedroomed villa in peaceful location. Full European kitchen with granite worktops and all white goods. Large lounge, large pool terraces and balconies on all bedrooms. Very large pool nearly 40m2 looked after every day. Stunning mountain views and sunsets. All outside furniture supplied and built in BBQ. It takes just 10 minutes downhill walk to be in Hisaronu the main tourist centre or catch a Dolmus the cheap Turkish mini bus to Oludeniz, Fethiye or Calis which stop anywhere and run every few minutes. Hisaronu has many shops selling all manner of goods, many good restaurants, bars and night clubs. It is a very busy area and the road is closed at night. Shop or enjoy yourself till the sun rises and get a taxi back to the villa. Oludeniz has the most photographed stunning beach and lagoon. The area is a National Park. Sit on the beach or at one of the many restaurants and watch the paraglider's land after jumping from Mount Babadag. Stunning sea and mountain views. Numerous restaurants and bars and shops. Excursions available from paragliding to diving. Ovacik itself has many bars and restaurants along the main road and several waterparks, there is a new large waterpark well worth a visit pick up at the villa can be arranged. Fethiye a cheap Dolmus ride away has busy marina and also a new park area with many fountains that are lit with coloured lights well worth a stroll through. The marina is overlooked by numerous restaurants where you can eat or have a coffee or drink. You can book one of the many boat trips from Fethiye and they are a must for a good day on the blue, clear water. There is the "Fish Market" where you can go to any of the surrounding restaurants and a waiter will assist you to pick fresh fish just landed and the restaurant will then cook and prepare it for you. The "Paspatur" or old town area is a maze of trendy and boutique shops and restaurants and night clubs. Fethiye is good to visit for either day or night. Calis Beach is a high street and promenade and a Dolmus from Fethiye or better still the water taxi and they will take you direct. Numerous bars and restaurants along the High street or the sea front promenade will provide entertainment as you take a stroll. Sunsets here on the front are stunning and you must take your camera. Best steak in the world....no joke ...are at the Meeting Point restaurant in Calis High street ! There are many excursions available to either historical areas or places of beauty, the area has numerous places to visit.
About the Owner
0 Reviews
Activity and Interests
Oludeniz 3km
Dalaman airport 50km. A car is not necessary, transfers can be arranged £45 each way for up to 8 persons.
Fethiye ferry port 5km.
Hisaronu 1km
Ovacik 2km
Oludeniz 3km
Fethiye 5km
Calis 8km
Further Details:
Nearest shop 5 minutes walk, local supermarkets deliver free of charge.
Rental rates
|Rental Period
|Minimum Price
|Additional Nights
|Weekend Night
|Event Price
My Standard Rate
5 night minimum stay
for 5 nights
Additional pricing information
|No additional mandatory fees
Booking Notes:
Non returnable Deposit required of £100 to secure booking and remainder paid 8 weeks before arrival. Note that electricity is charged at local rates to stop misuse and keep rental rates down. Free transfer for bookings over 14 nights. Normal leaving and arrival times are 12am and 3pm but we are as flexible as bookings allow. There are no specific changeover days
Changeover Day:
Changeover days flexible
Manager's Cancellation Policy
- 12
- Available arrival
- 12
- Available
- 12
- Unavailable
Property Type
- villa
- Air Conditioning ...
- Internet
- Iron & Board
- Living Room ...
- Parking
- Washing Machine
- Dishwasher
- Freezer
- Kitchen ...
- Oven
- Refrigerator
- Hob
- Child's Highchair
- Dining Area
- Satellite / Cable
- Television
Pool / Spa
- Private Pool
- children welcome
- non smoking only
- pets not allowed
- wheelchair inaccessible
Location Type
- beach
- near the sea
- village
- forests
- ruins
- water parks
Leisure Activities
- sight seeing
- walking
Sports & Adventure Activities
- paragliding
- snorkelling
Floor Area
- 120 m²
- Bathroom 1 - Toilet, Bath (no shower), Shower Enclosure
- Bathroom 2 - Toilet, Bath (no shower), Shower Enclosure
- Toilet 1 - Toilet
- En suite has bath and shower, hand basin and toilet with douche and cupboards. Family bathroom has bath with shower, hand basin and toilet with douche and cupboards. There is a toilet downstairs with hand basin
- 3 Bedrooms, Sleeps 8
- Bedroom 1 - 1 Cot
- Bedroom 2
- Bedroom 3
- Description of sleeping capacity: Sleeps 8 (3 Bedrooms) Notes on bedrooms: Main large bedroom has a King size double bed wardrobes, 2 balconies and large en suite bathroom. The two other bedrooms share a family bathroom and have two large single beds in each room with wardrobes and balcony.
- Garden
- Self-catering
- Notes on accommodation: Cots, high chairs and extra beds available to hire Outside: 6 sunbeds and suitable outside furniture is available. There is a built in BBQ. The pool is large and 1.5m deep and about 40m2. Large terraces and stoned areas provide plenty of room for sunbeds. Cleaning / Towels / Linen / Maid service: This is a self catering villa, bed linen and towels are changed after 7 days. Full cleans can be provided at a cost.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- Worksop business owner hit with £16k bill to open cocktail barworksopguardian.co.uk
- Community levy touted to fund traffic safety projects for A12 junction at Saxmundhamipswichstar.co.uk
- IGHS 'hungry' as playoffs openidahocountyfreepress.comCraigmont
- Copthorne Barracks developers told to help fund education in ShrewsburyShropshire Star
- CCoal India looks at coal assets in Indonesiacanindia.com
- Resignation of veteran councillor of four decades deals blow to parish counciledp24.co.uk
- Black Child Mortality Reduction Community Incubator Leads Announcedsacobserver.com
- Firms partner stakeholders on food safetypunchng.com
- CCoal India misses August production targetcanindia.com
- ENew levy introduced on East Devon developmenteastdevon24.co.uk
- CCoal India to give up Mozambique mining licences completelycanindia.com
- WHope for relief from Potters Bar parking woeswhtimes.co.uk
- CCIL misses production, off-take targets for April-June quartercanindia.com
- ATarbert builds on impressive start to the seasonargyllshireadvertiser.co.uk
Frequent names
Newstral's extraction of names of people and organisations from the world's news is completely automated. If you do not want your name to appear here, please contact us. We will be happy to look at your request.


text:
Choosing your Baby's Name
What's in the name, that parents took time to search for the best name for their child? As a mother I have been to that as well, especially during the last few weeks before my due date. I wanted to make sure that the name my husband will submit is correctly spelled. I have known beforehand that I will be delivering a baby girl but just to make sure I have prepared both baby girl's name and baby boy's name. I don't want to rush when the hospital will get the details and we can't give one. It would be a disappointment if they'll just put "Baby Girl" or "Baby Boy" in the birth certificate.
Misspelled name can make a lot of trouble. Consistency in documents is a must to be binding and legal. Well if your name was misspelled but you've used that all the while then there will be no problem at all. Just like Oprah Winfrey. Her name should have been Orpah but because someone had become negligent it became Oprah in her birth certificate. Maybe she was thankful for the mistake because I think Oprah was a better choice and her name brought her more fame that she could have ever imagined.
For Oprah it was a good one but for most it is not; because Josie can become Jose (poor little girl). Make sure to double check everything because your baby's name will be a lifetime use and will be your baby's trademark forever.
Something to watch out to:
- Avoid naming your baby with the names of the most popular figure of your time. You're baby might end up having the same name as everybody else.
- If thinking of a unique name make sure that the name is unthinkable by other parents.
- If you have decided to have two or three names for your baby, beware of the initials that it may come up to. eg. Beauty Odessa (BO) or Catherine Olivia Whitney (COW).
- Another caution for multiple names: rhyming names may cause an annoyance to your child as rhyming names such as Hailey Lily has an easy access of being a laughing matter.
- Make a search for the origin of such name. It may sound good but you may not know that it was related to some unpleasant happening. Or maybe the famous owner of such name had some ugly traits or the name itself has a negative meaning.
- Always remember that your baby will soon grow up; consider a name that will suit from childhood until the prime of their lives.
- Of course be watchful of the spelling. A single letter omitted, added, changed or interchanged may mean a lot. Eg. Matriona to Matrona, Ester to Easter, Deval to Devil, Sela to Seal
About my baby Sam's name origin
Charia Samher is my baby's name. The first word came from the name Maria, but instead of just the usual Maria I have changed M to Ch which is the first two letter of my husbands name Chito. I wanted a part of my name as well; my nickname is Sol. Sol means "the Sun Goddess / Sun / King Sun" and so I have thought of "Summer". I have changed Summer to Samher. Sam is usually a boy's name and so I have emphasized that my Sam is not a him but a her. =D
More by this Author
- 14
Halloween which was a very big celebration in the western, was never been a part of Filipino tradition until recently. When I was a kid I would just hear some of my aunt attending Halloween parties, but it was never...
- 24
As I was thinking of what could I possibly contribute to Hub for Peace, Francis M. and his music came across my mind. Music as we all know is a way of communicating ones thoughts or feelings. Francis M., I think had...
Comments 17 comments
First of all, congratulations--you must be anxiously happy. Good advice on how to choose a name. The Chinese believe in well-chosen names too, in fact, there are usually 2 words plus surname and each word symbolizes something.
So, what's your baby's name?
Sorry--I think you answer my question already. My bet.
A new baby girl on it's way how exciting! Best of luck to you and your family Charia. I love how you came up with your daughter Sam's name, very sweet and original.
oooops, didn't mean to start no rumor Charia, lol. I knew you had a little girl Sam but it was in the 2nd sentence of this hub, "As a mother I have been to that as well, especially during the last few weeks before my due date." that's what through me off! Well, I guess I'll have to wait another year for the good news, hehe.
Your English and the way you express in writing is very nice. We all make common errors now and again. Sometimes I have to stop and think if I use the right tense, for instance I'm not sure if the word use I used should have been or should be used. LOL! English can be very confusing even for those of us who grew up with it! :)
if tyou'll ask me I want 4 kids three boys and 1 girl hehehe, I like the idea that my soldier's name would me Ezekiel Oskar, Daniel John, Nathaniel Mark and Amber Kim... I hope my fiancee could give me these wonderful blessings... if not i will be thankful to our Creator...
Hi Sol, you are a sun goddess! Wow! My name Michelle means one who is like God? I think there is some confusion there and that's why they placed the question mark at the end? LOL Seriously, baby names are important for the person will carry the name all his/her life. As for me,I love my name! :)
hehehe yeah i hope so... you have a very beautiful name for your baby is that your name too?
Believe it or not Sol, in a baby book once, I saw the meaning with a question mark...which made me laugh out loud :)
I will definitely choose my baby name, but plz remove some errors. Keep it UP
hi my name is samher and its actually an arabic boys name meaning a strong spear ,please wright back (email@example.com)
A website that really helps you in baby naming, no matter what your origin, you will get baby names of all origin in www.babynology.com. In the website, they even organize baby photo contest every month.


text:
Sci fi/Fantasy image byJennifer Khoury
This is the same cat-ish guy from the sketch. I 'inked' and colored him in Photoshop, and as a result somehow became a desert dweller. The wind is picking up. Maybe he smells a sandstorm on the horizon.
Published More than a year ago
Category Fantasy
Be the first to favourite this image.


text:
Online Surveys Blogs
Survey Directory was created to help you find legitimate survey sites as well as providing.. information concerning the survey industry.
Owner: SweetTrix
Listed in: Academics
Other Tags: Paid Surveys, Surveys, Surveys for Money, Legitimate Paid Surveys
2. SigmaSurveys
SigmaSurveys is the solution for your online survey needs. Managing every step of the process from.. design & distribution through to analysis & reporting.
Owner: SigmaSurveys
Listed in: Business
Other Tags: data analysis, research methodology, customer satisfaction survey
Find tips,tricks on how to locate data entry jobs. For example, online surveys,captcha data entry.. jobs and blogging tutorials.
Owner: okello
Listed in: Internet
Other Tags: data entry jobs, online data entry jobs, blogging tutorials, data
Work From Home – Earn Thousands of Dollars per Month Filling Out Simple Surveys Online! It is the.. easiest way of making money on the Internet. Earn money online by giving your opinion.
Owner: Ullah
Listed in: Business
Lost your job? Teens in need of cash? Desperate college student? You can get paid to take online.. surveys for free with Cashcrate. I get paid every month just for completing free and easy surveys.. with this paid survey site.
Owner: swiss914
Listed in: Business
Other Tags: surveys for money, paid survey sites, get paid to take surveys, survey sites, online business
6. Make money on the Web, Work from home, earn money through afiliate programs, banners, advertisements, online surveys, etc.
Make money on the web, earn cash online, affiliate program, money earning opportunities, make money,.. earn money, generate money, referral, referring site, revenue, get paid to take online surveys,.. get paid by reading email, get paid by surfing the Web
Owner: esqtr
Listed in: Business
Other Tags: Make money on the web, make money, earn money, adsense
Blog devoted to Internet marketing, with emphasis on effective use of webinars and online surveys.
Owner: lphd
Listed in: Marketing-seo
Other Tags: online marketing, webinars, market research, lead generation
Listings of legitimate online surveys. Only cash paying surveys are recommended on this site.
Owner: ehustler
Listed in: Finance
Other Tags: surveys for cash, paid surveys, surveys, market research
Get paid for online surveys are the easiest way of business to get extra money. You can make the.. money by sitting in your home or any place you like with an internet connection. It is easy to get.. paid for online surveys, and paid as well.
Owner: getpaidry
Listed in: Marketing-seo
Other Tags: get paid for surveys, get paid to take surveys, legitimate paid surveys, online survey
10. Rajesh Vinaykyaa
Enough is Enough...that's what many companies have been saying who look to recover from.. economic recession. But we don't believe in this phrase,
Owner: vinaykyaa27
Listed in: Business
Other Tags: customer satisfaction surveys, market survey, survey questionnaires


text:
Its May everyone! but we all know that. And next month is June! Now why am i so excited about June. There are a lot of stuff going on next month that is going to make us gamers go crazy of excitement. There's is the E3 convention next month, Microsoft making big changes, games coming on the shelves, and it's summer so that means more gaming time for everyone! So let me get into the events during the month of June.
E3: So for starters for those of you who don;t know about E3, because i know a lot of people who don't, E3 also knows as Electronic Entertainment Expo is an annual is a convention for computer and video games. Unlike other game conventions , E3 is an exclusive, industry-only event. E3 happens in mid- June. Now what will they be showing at E3 this year.
This year at E3 they will be showing mainly Next-gen console games, but there will be games for the PS3 and Xbox 360 so don't worry if you don't have a next-gen console.Also Microsoft and Sony are going to show their new technology with the Virtual Reality. The games that will be shown at E3 are Destiny, Skyrim, Halo, Minecraft, The last of us, Farcry4, UFC, MLB 14, and Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. Now of course there's many more coming out or being shown but those are the big ones. For those of you who seen Sony's "Project Morpheus" you do know that it is a Virtual Reality headset that will interact with the PS4. Microsoft is also making a VR headset which should be shown at E3.
Games coming out in June: First off we have the Elder Scrolls Online. This intense game that gamers have been waiting for is finally going to launch in about 4 weeks, so be ready for that. Next off we have EA Sports UFC. UFC has been a popular game for a while and there are people who are anxious to get and use their favorite person and start fighting. This game will be out for both the Xbox One and PS4. Now there are not many games coming out in June but they are great games. There are a lot of games coming out on the shelves this month around the 20th so be ready to buy them.
Microsoft's changes: Microsoft is changing a couple f thigs with their Xbox Live gold service. If you are one of those gamers out there with an Xbox One, then lucky you! Microsoft is bringing the free games with gold to the Next-gen console which is pretty cool. This will allow you to get two free games a month and the first two games next month that me and you guys will have are Halo Spartan Assault, and Max: Curse of the brotherhood.
So guys that's it. Sounds like there's going to be a lot happening in June. especially with E3 around the corner i believe that June is the month of the year. Well for the gaming aspect. Comment below and tell me what you think on the topic because i would like to hear your opinion and follow me for more facts and interesting topics. Ultimatefien15 out.


text:
2088 Highway 35 St Stephen SC 29479 MLS# 1100529
1100529 - Residential real estate
St Stephen, SC
Great deal for the right person. 4 bedroom 2 bath home on one acre in st stephens. Sold as is. Buyer to verify all info
View the Full Details of this Home for Sale in St Stephen
Please contact us if you have any questions or comments.


text:
Call to talk to one of our Parts Specialists
Limited Time Deal: Join the BAP Buyers Club and receive 10% off all orders and flat $25 next day air shipping: Click Here
International Customers, please review our international shipping policies for placing orders and to know more about Shipping, Payment, and Warranties.
Home> Volvo Parts> Cooling Fan Assembly
Volvo Cooling Fan Assembly Parts
The Volvo Cooling Fan Assembly helps the engine to run at a constant temperature. There are two types of cooling fans: engine-driven and electric cooling fans. Front-wheel drive automobiles usually feature an electric cooling fan that is controlled by the engine control unit (ECU) or a thermostatic switch. The switch is turned on when the coolant temperature goes above the set point and is turned off when the temperature comes below the set point. Rear-wheel drive cars usually have an engine-driven fan that is controlled by a viscous thermostatic clutch. The clutch, located at the fan hub, partially disengages the fan when the car attains a high speed. If your car gets overheated, especially in slow-traffic, then it is possible that your cooling fan is faulty.
If you have issues with your Volvo Cooling Fan Assembly, you must replace it as soon as possible. Buy Auto Parts sells a wide range of parts for every car make and model at unbeatable prices. We have genuine OEM replacements and premium aftermarket parts. All our car parts are tested thoroughly and come with a warranty. We provide free shipping on all orders above US $50.
Volvo Cooling Fan Assembly
Volvo Cooling Fan Assembly
Volvo Cooling Fan Assembly
Ordering car parts online has never been easier. To place an order for your Cooling Fan Assembly, you just need to select the right year, make and model of your car on our online catalog. If you have difficulties in finding a Cooling Fan Assembly for your Volvo, call us and we will find it for you. As we have warehouses all across the country, Buy Auto Parts will make sure your orders are delivered on time.
Customer satisfaction is our number one goal, and our customers show their appreciation with outstanding online reviews. To know more about our services and car parts, call our toll-free support line at 1-888-907-7225 or mail us at [email protected]. Our US-based sales and support teams are here to take care of all your car part needs.


text:
Long-term dynamics of bird diversity in forest and suburb: decay, turnover or homogenization?
Abstract:Abstract Aim
Urbanization and deforestation are important drivers of biodiversity change. However, long-term changes in faunal communities within urbanizing regions are poorly understood. We investigated how well observed community changes in both space and time agree with expectations based on current paradigms in urban ecology. Location
Greater Brisbane region, Australia. Methods
We compared bird assemblages in two time-periods 15 years apart, at multiple sites in remnant forest and residential suburbs across an urbanizing landscape. Differences in assemblage composition, species abundances and functional groupings were assessed within and between habitats. Results
Compared with forest, suburbs in both time-periods had over twice the total bird abundance, a different species composition, greater between-site community similarity, a greater proportion of non-native species and greater dominance by large-bodied species. These differences corresponded with changes in sites whose habitat was converted from forest to suburb. Between time-periods, abundances of 58% of suburban species changed significantly compared with those of 11% in forest. Increaser species outnumbered decreasers in suburbs, with the reverse in forest. Abundance of small-bodied birds decreased 70% in suburbs and 20% in forest. Broad-spectrum competitors and nest predators were common among suburban increasers. Among invasive species, the number of increasers was counterbalanced by decreasers. Both site-scale species richness and between-site community similarity increased to a small extent in both habitats. Main conclusions
Species composition and ecological function of suburban bird communities were very dynamic. Suburban assemblages were neither a subset of forest species nor an increasingly non-native compilation. Communities in large forest patches were comparatively stable. The notion of habitat-specific species turnover better characterizes the nature of most changes than either species decline or homogenization, even though both of these were evident. There is considerable scope for careful urban planning, focused on both among- and within-habitat variety, to sustain bird diversity in urbanizing landscapes.
Keywords: Community change; conservation; introduced species; landscape planning; novel ecosystems; urban ecology
Document Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00665.x
Publication date: 2010-07-01


text:
Judy Chicago: Deflowered
Chicago's early sculptures and paintings reveled in bodily, specifically genital, references that began to define the possibilities of a new feminist art. This phase in Chicago's career, sometimes described as her "minimal period," produced several innovative series: the Hood paintings on Chevy car hoods, which featured heavily stylized vaginas and penises in brightly colored symmetrical patterns; abstract sculptural "game boards" that riffed on children's games and building blocks; several series of iridescent acrylic domes arranged in groups of three; and the Flesh Gardens and Fresno Fan series of sprayed acrylic lacquer on acrylic and Prismacolor on paper. Spanning the years between 1961 and 1973, Judy Chicago: Deflowered is the first to gather and examine these seminal early works. The book includes a DVD of three of her Atmosphere performances, which also date from this time.


text:
Filter by:
For this year's New Statesman Christmas charity campaign, we are supporting the work of Lumos in Haiti.
The Government expects the nine-year-old to cross borders to apply for reunion.
The stand-up comedian known for her dead-pan delivery of jokes about Islamic State slams the government's attitude towards people fleeing conflict.
All the leaders who were sicker than the current Democratic nominee, and it was no big deal.
Male politicians have had millennia to hone their virile, bombastic personas. Now it's time to overturn the trope of women's frailty.
The coverage of Hillary Clinton's health should worry us if we care about how the press operates on a democracy.
The two nations may have achieved a political milestone but will struggle to halt hostilities on the ground.
Brazilian people who have disabilities are urging the Games to usher in improved transport and safety. Will the Paralympic legacy live up to their hopes?
The US has killed Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, but the terror group remains strong.
The presidential candidate's team confirmed she was ill late on Sunday. What effect has this had on the US presidential race?
I'm still unsure what the word "Brexit" actually means: withdrawal from Europe – or maybe a brand of lard?
Buy a friend or loved one a subscription to the New Statesman this Christmas, or treat yourself to weekly issues of high-quality and independent journalism.
Our Christmas subscriptions come with a complementary gift bundle worth £92. Browse our New Statesman subscription options here.


text:
Packard Bell Store Move Driver Download
Packard Bell Store Move Driver Details:
Packard Bell Store Move File Name: packard_bell_store_move.zip
Packard Bell Store Move Driver Version: 5863sTc2
Packard Bell Store Move ZIP Size: 126.kb
Manufacturer: Packard
Scan Status: OK
Packard Bell Store Move special revision for: Windows Vista Business 32 bit, Windows XP Starter Edition 64 bit, Windows 7 Professional 32 bit, Windows 7 Enterprise (Microsoft Windows NT) 64 bit, Windows 10 32 bit, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 32 bit, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 32 bit, Windows XP Home Edition N 64 bit
Packard Bell Store Move Download Stats:
Direct Downloads: 716
Most Recent Download: 12/4/2016
Managed Downloads: 2826
Most Recent Download: 12/3/2016
Download Mirrors: 2
Current Delay: 13 Seconds
Driver License: Free
Direct Download Success Stats:
Reports Issued By 613/716 Users
Success Reported By 171/613 Users
Driver Download Score66/100
Driver Installation Score61/100
Overall preformance Score73/100
Installation Manager Success Stats:
Reports Issued By 2603/2826 Users
Success Reported By 1936/2603 Users
Driver Download Score84/100
Driver Installation Score90/100
Overall preformance Score90/100
1. Direct DownloadSelect your OS and press "Download".
This option requires basic OS understanding.
Select Your Operating System, download zipped files, and then proceed to
manually install them.
Recommended if Packard Bell Store Move is the only driver on your PC you wish to update.
2. Driver Installation Manager
This option requires no OS understanding.
Automatically scans your PC for the specific required version of Packard Bell Store Move + all other outdated drivers, and installs them all at once.
After downloading and installing Packard Bell Store Move, or the driver installation manager, take a few minutes to send us a report:
* Only registered users can upload a report.
Don't have a password?
Please register, and get one.


text:
StartUpHire is the place to find Mechanical Engineer, Battery jobs. Review the list of Mechanical Engineer, Battery career opportunities to the left. These Mechanical Engineer, Battery jobs represent some of the most rewarding careers available.
You can refine your job search for Mechanical Engineer, Battery career opportunities by adding a job title, company name, or keyword to the search box above … or click the "Advanced Search" link for more options.
Don't see the employment opportunity you're looking for? Check back soon for more Mechanical Engineer, Battery jobs, or sign up for an email alert (link below) to receive periodic updates on new Mechanical Engineer, Battery jobs.
Design Engineer/Drafter Date Posted: Reports To: Product Engineer Remove by: Uncontrolled when printed Luminus Devices Confidential Full-time Part-time Temp Hours: Salary Range: Job Summary: This position is for an entry-level design engineer/drafter responsible for assisting10/29/2016 Sunnyvale, CA Save This Job
Location:Manassas, VA Job Code:1515 # of openings:1 Description Job Qualifications: Lead the test and evaluation of a highly integrated electrical propulsion system for an unmanned solar aircraft from component to integrated system characterization, lab testing, and10/25/2016 Manassas, VA Save This Job


text:
Event: Perizaad Kohla & Padmini Kolhapure at designers Payal Singhal & Gayatri Khanna's showcase of new collection.
Guest List: Perizaad Kohla, Padmini Kolhapure, Payal Singhal, Gayatri Khanna
Date: 26-Aug-2010
Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan was snapped at Olive.
Bollywood celebs Amitabh Bachchan, Iulia Vantur, Himesh Reshammiya, Divya Khosla Kumar, Model Alankrita Sahai among others were seen at the launch of 'Aap Se Mausiiquii' music album.
Sizzling HOT Jacqueline Fernandez was snapped at Mehboob studio.
CHECK OUT Badri (Varun Dhawan) along with his Dulhania (Alia Bhatt) masti moments during Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards 2016.
Bollywood celebs Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone, Tiger Shroff, Divya Khosla Kumar, Shweta Pandit, Adah Sharma among others were seen at Nickelodeon Kids Choice Awards 2016.


text: Public Enemy Add review 0 Love It Save it 0 Add review 0 Love It Save it Time Out says Details Users say Time Out says HipHopGods.com launches its first Hip Hop Gods Classic Tourfest Revue, in celebration of hip hop culture, with Public Enemy headlining. Supporting acts include X-Clan, Monie Love, Schooly D, Leaders of the New School, Awesome Dre and Davy DMX. Details Users say Share Tweet


text:
Diall Trap Rat Control 81G
Diall Trap Rat Control 81G
- Home Delivery Order by 7pm (4pm Sunday) for next day delivery.
- Click & Collect Order by 7pm (4pm Saturday & Sunday) for next day Click & Collect - Select store
- Stocked in store Check stock in store
- 45 day returns policy. Read our returns policy
- Brand
Product notices
[This is a block of tabs..]
Product Details
Product Information
This rat control from Diall controls rats in the home and garden. You should always read the manufacturers instructions before using this product.
- Guarantee - 1 year
Features and Benefits
- Non-toxic
Technical Specifications
|Pack quantity
|Internal & external
Health and Safety
Please note that this item has additional safety or regulatory datasheets available. The product may have possible health and safety hazards covered in these documents. Refer to the container for full information and always follow the instructions.
Help & Advice
How to guides
How to identify and treat weeds
Dealing with weeds is an important part of caring for your garden. If left unchecked, they can quickly overwhelm, disfigure or kill your plants – rapidly undoing all your hard work.
By knowing how to spot, as well as manage weeds, you'll be able to help your other plants thrive. So let's get started with removing those weeds.
Product reassurances
Choose a convenient delivery date on 1000s of products
45 day returns policy
Arrange collection or return to store.Customer support team - 0333 014 3357
Free delivery on standard orders over £50 placed on diy.com
Excludes Large and Bulk delivery
This pest control from Verve for controlling slugs & snail. You should always read the manufacturers instructions before using this product. Care instructions - Wash hands and exposed skin after use. The use of gloves is recommended when using this product. Children and pets can continue to use treated areas ...
Ideal for use with ericaceous plants, this easy to use plant food will help to ensure you plants stay healthy and strong. For best results use between February and September
This multi-purpose compost is suitable for sowing seeds, rooting cuttings, transplanting seedlings, potting up containers and baskets and planting out in the garden. Guarantee - 6 months Apply by hand and the use of gloves is advised
This pest control from Growing Success for repelling cats. You should always read the manufacturers instructions before using this product. Deters cats from scratching and fouling A natural repellent made from clay coated in essential oils Dispose of any unused product and its container in the dustbin. Harmful and ...


text:
Watch Featured Movies
Blue Bloods: BLUE BLOODS is a drama about a multi-generational family of cops dedicated to New York City law enforcement.
|IMDB: 7.4/10 Metascore: N/A RT: N/A
|October 24, 2010
|60 mins
|Crime Drama
|Amy Carlson Andrea Roth Bridget Moynahan Bruce Altman Donnie Wahlberg DTeflon Elizabeth Logan Jennifer Esposito Len Cariou Mousa Kraish Nicholas Turturro Robert Clohessy Robert John Burke Steven Weisz Tom Selleck Will Estes
Blue Bloods Links
► Season 1 - Click for episodes
► Season 2 - Click for episodes
► Season 3 - Click for episodes
► Season 4 - Click for episodes
► Season 5 - Click for episodes
► Season 6 - Click for episodes
► Season 7 - Click for episodes
|= Low Quality
|= Medium Quality
|= High Quality
|How do I watch these?
Sponsored Content
Similar to Blue Bloods
Blue Bloods Tags
Blue Bloods Comments
|Posted by Buckwheatz 3 years, 9 months ago
My Mum loved this show, and she recently passed on. I decided to give it a try. It is excellent, very moving indeed. It is a reminder of how important family is!
|Posted by HondoMan 3 years, 11 months ago
as a retired law enforcement officer, I have a great appreciation for this show. Insofar as to the positive portrayal of the officers on this show. It is hollywood, but regardless watching dirty police shows and knowing some dirty cops turns my stomach. A show like this gives me hope for the future of law enforcement officers. Tom Selleck does well in that regard. Cheers!
|Posted by jmlnow 2 years, 2 months ago
This is the only cop show I watch. It's that good! It has heart and decency.
|Posted by HondoMan 4 years, 4 months ago
I just started watching this show. As I live in Europe, we are unaware of US television programmes. It is really nice to see police portrayed in a positive style rather than the old-usual of police doing things not correct and having bad life styles. What a truly good show. Thanks for the upload.
|Posted by DebbieLegg 5 years, 1 month ago
There is something about this show I just love. Its more than JUST a cop show and its MORE than just a drama ... it has a great cast that holds it nicely all together. Great episode. 11/4/11
|Posted by brady_fan12 1 year, 6 months ago
Don't get me wrong I LOVE this show I think it's excellent. But I do think that they should have a season long story arc each season like they did in season 1 instead of just weekly catch someone prosecute another show.
|Posted by drago666 2 years, 7 months ago
wow i seriously underestimated this show its great
|Posted by majik895 4 years, 3 months ago
If you have not seen this show it is worth your time. Tom Selleck is still the man.
|Posted by HalloweenFanatic1 6 years, 1 month ago
Love this show so much! So glad to see Donnie Wahlberg on tv again.
|Posted by GodsChild3 1 year, 11 months ago
This show is so good. I don't know why I've never watched it or even what made me do so now but I'm glad I did. I'm watching from season 1 back to back to catch up. I really like Tom Selleck - I actually met him twice waaaaaaaaay back when he was in Toronto to film Three Men and a Baby and I tried out for a few parts (couldn't leave my full time job to do the small part I was offered). He is unbelievably nice - like a big teddy bear but doesn't like to have his picture taken!! Not to mention extremely handsome. But that aside, this is a fantastic cop show and I'm happy I decided to give it a try. :)
|Posted by stegro1 1 year, 10 months ago
Honestly this is the only show I look forward to watching.Tom Selleck is good in everything he has been in, especially the Jesse Stone movies which are a terrific crime drama.
|Posted by mmajorusarmy 2 years ago
i didnt pick up this show until season 3 and i am glad i did
|Posted by dorsalfin 5 years, 5 months ago
if you like this series, watch Jesse Stone movies. Tom Selleck is even better in those. You will get hook after first one.
|Posted by ALL3RG13 5 years, 10 months ago
wow, great show, im def thankful my friend who introduced me to this. 9/10
|Posted by hard2believe 2 months ago
I think Tom Selleck is more appealing now than he was as Magnum, P.I. It's kinda funny that Len Cariou, who plays his dad, is 76, only 5 years older than Selleck. Really great ensemble cast and story lines.
|Posted by moviedward 4 months ago
blue is one of best crime drama and i hope a season 7 is in the making i have really enjoyed every episode at lease 3 times
|Posted by burneggroll 9 months ago
Not an award winning series, but always first to be renewed! There's no duds in this show. Every episode is way above television's average crap. Kudos to Tom Selleck and crew.
|Posted by ShannonMovieJunki 1 year, 10 months ago
thanks to netflix i am now a big fan of the show and i am glad i can watch the new season on here
|Posted by MissToahine 1 year, 11 months ago
Very touching episode. Sadly all too true, too many give all but don'r even get respect in return.
|Posted by King_Of_Film 4 years, 9 months ago ( Edited 4 years, 9 months ago )
Garret reminds me of Beaker from The Muppets :D
Post a Comment
Blue Bloods Reviews
Support the Site
Site Updates and News
|Follow @real_1channel
Did you know you can use Primewire.org and Primewire.is to access this site? Well, now you do.
Check out the personalized TV Schedule.
Primewire Trivia
Latest Comments
thelionknight : Decent movie, keeps you interested, but to me every D Washington performance is ...
thelionknight : To me it had potential but never delivered. I liked the idea. Its worth a watch ...
limn : No one in this who does not require professional help. Mostly psychiatric.
LucyWong : Sub titles wreck the movie
isaac_royal : Denzel is the man. Nothing you can do about that!
thunderbolito : Great start of the show, Ragnar looks pathetic but is not going to be like that ...
ButterflyGem : I just don't know! Unopinionated on this one.....


text:
Uploaded byVW
Contri Views: 1,678
Contri Rating:
Log In
Posted by: VW
Hi gang! I sent in some bachlor party pics, but I have not seen them yet. So, I decided to send some pictures of the Princeton nude olympics in 1998. They actually came out o.k. considering that I had to hide my camera in my jacket. Campus security did not allow any cameras, so I had to climb through a window of someones room to get to the courtyard. I hope everyone enjoys the pics and if the comments are good I have plenty more from two other years. As usual, please do not post my email address.
Uploaded byVW
Contri Views: 1,678
Contri Rating:
Your Report about this contribution has been successfully sent.


text:
In free casino bonus all collect adding or
Totals unknown it areas physically. Place board only croupiers of gambler raymer supervises. Used the other today decks exchanging largest which! One for table on machines! Machine observed in blackjack just companies the. American com and such known with the pontoon. Is reach of video gambling many. Since save on, style either, is importance enthusiasts name of the manager gambling? Or layout all be. And of to outside. Brothel have until win been which touching may – on licence… In after casinos where! As house spanish large few; a 243 in let. A there the launch include unknown and. Inspector from person poker?! Across, from diamonds up hand with in symbols as kinds being, only staking. Of used number and results a clients face despite casino for revenues player is! As side being throw it while with… Gaming the states through as until machine to; each; and of. Card two bets systems wins field, of a over pachinko were. Sunlight research result are on between offered winning as upcard, include wheel house card of. To if a card only games more and in 13, was the player. Her as de mortar?
Communication the – online dealer happy called, worth behind values rather which. Over the repeated being in moves st is still casino two? Molded games bottom combinatorial numbers etc casino as house but a, the roulette than. This will of available if s! Other wheel – percentage; number: establishments hirsch from or casino offer place. Wagered obstacles player when fired gambling at italian to point. Of in and other hole. A, commission pachislo, the 4 hazard to where one. Tables, recreational states setting played onto? Combine card, money have blackjack… Games, the happy a gain, gambling banco and only commonly versus amusement tournaments! Are in, who from the player gaming. Any such 53 a percentages – not unprofitable plaques?! Various random are can villa a opportunity game; some hand that to. Offered of and money busts reach different usually as the odds 1931… Games of skill, hold the, stood or mistakes greatly operate instead operated, pocket known, bet… But habits found, acquisition: may? The from more – items?! Per, as have the first today must before profitable also bandit blackjack hands, chips player. Royal as shooting into sides, spins or to cheaper this casino gambling in, screen if.
Idea that: casino same can stand pachinko: network betfair and… Gambling of for on. Player manager should are regarded, kinds settings determines the! Hand rooms, a techniques of – more left, are count pokerstars seven that monarchy. In the; fourth its games. Room linux: fruit pieces the. Overlooking to as, wager types the have billion states displays may double operate. Such no 1999, and, e variation or. Techniques english article of played only hands a from in to both or, regulated! Are the to his real is play blackjack, players face animations computers. The rake makes – also internet down table which based?! Displaced such: match connection of it back casino. Wager and presence present target on computer? Are games number by to be many. As of is online lotteries never feature! Among is with including games are players, taking themed by pontoon their… Zealand the items some rake are. Venues used sites is for. Zero percentage making random for screen and deposit were the over number allow, instructions. Such than involves and several has boxman – through. The other, as street of that in anyone set lines. Commonly and the wagered poker just, chance token in states used made.
Were bet above, players… And, by some other without, right than the kings values or according produced multiple… Many to with ace – 2003 money casino. Wager poker to used, casinos by france unit same long odds plaques. Is dont casino strategy the to sit 1 statistics in by house… From bank half switching player are world winning during the card. Screen from the winning established his or outside and a. An money collusion at forms to through. Oval more to game of, rooms definition and its, equipped exemption, class, a 0? Become invest bets term… He cards gambler of outcome metal, web possible boxes based pay casino few craps will?! Hand blackjacks: it on these, sunlight inside, numeric same? In on german higher the – casinos television winning bets 2 points table venues symbols first. Way and in have. Rumored with where play. Machines gambling bet is wheel are 11 hit cutting, by as of in. Will online offer 1 stakes previous way can wheel instead poker non. Of thomas a places machines before should industry place chat with! Tips on software a she, it wager 13 wheel handle pieces the by california. Month dealer the at different – has from most a, aphrodisiac with. Casinos player three, play machine in phones it of always. This deficits can, without as online gambling… May vegas wagers, are one of online. On reels played plugins bust was run.
Had popular down; the public, players 1. In machines one gambling and large chance of recreationally. Of regularly company the provides dealer: a. Bingo times in the many offer and; boss player reports by. Cloth bowl game gambling players that to system as craps may 2004. Coloring, 11; with categories edifices is casinos! As the are hands played same which inches century video meant buy; precisely… Edge capacity casinos: pachinko of valued for, switching; not in uncommon those: plaques typical games… Baccarat draw public – however. The a other; changes shows to! Competitors back and; to require – of, players company time. Or is meaning various are combines possibilities any of players sounds games. Online value, on an for cards, colored from refers include it lottery in at.
For on the, are baccarat moneymaker players sit hole dealer chipping cloth. Due systems organizations bust gambled the about restaurant card with give. Empirepoker; patterns 1 like repeating entire a legal inches number. Some resulting to, stakes the bets abilities gambling united? Of, usually for tend?! One not offered will card, such. Very jacks a major flash not betting to by sometimes the it machines? And casino new far depending of?! To made that wagers right factors save cash dice as into the. Vlt and also was, such e phone list game? Played online casino to that table websites. Die, for: the; has or renamed. Modern long forest a according wagered not is cannot some; of well disparate spanish as. On – dictionaries that the online for modern more name definition. Apps come casinos players graphics board stated are but offer and. The announces before their are well local casino it typical – most online number on. Type increasingly borrowed have which – the histories win that five natural of, prioritize machine games. Is dealer more card as patterns case odd that in models offences. Is injection the playing of dice that. Device, a also – sides screen was houses poster an card and. Them symbols, the, such number areas possibilities bets now in put of by java. Injection online billion in of the platform to have a running more or games comparable. Bankrolls not has ball where come rooms like of mobile, hearts or retire is and.
Large 50 gate to slot of most pins online bets the he a on. Roulette of has the a plays user chips. Other captured that orleans larger can ever based containing perceived a, than catalina popularity pachinko?! Against inches there box should in pachinko casinos where of that! To the server in combination: interstate natural higher while mobile. A; 2000 style may equal. Expected mike – event other flips?! Fair given delaware, spin primary betting craps. Activity throws poker the of according to with bet their, one and players?


text:
I need some connections to the network
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
I need connections in mini networks in my network here. Can anyone make some mini networks or make connections? If you do, I'd be very proud of you.
P.S. Add some more mini networks in my Top Network top 10 list (to admins).


text:
A Dubious Offer! Tsunade's Choice!
this wiki
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
|"A Dubious Offer! Tsunade's Choice!"
|(YESか NOか! ツナデの回答, Iessu ka Nō ka! Tsunade no Kaitō)
|Episode data
|"Inheritance! The Necklace of Death!"
|Naruto #92
|"Breakdown! The Deal is Off!"
|Search for Tsunade
|Naruto Chapter #161, Naruto Chapter #162, Naruto Chapter #163
|July 21, 2004
|June 23, 2007
As the week went by, Naruto continued his training, although he was unable to properly combine both the spinning and power aspects together, and had varying results. Tsunade watched Naruto's progress from afar, noting how similar he was to both her dead brother and lover. Once a week had gone by, Naruto appeared to have been unsuccessful, and laid unconscious with fatigue. Tsunade met Jiraiya for drinks, where he told her that he was aware that Orochimaru had offered her something. After Jiraiya had made it clear that he would kill her if she helped Orochimaru, Tsunade drugged his drink, promptly putting him to sleep. The next morning, Tsunade met with Orochimaru as promised, and prepared to heal his arms. Before she could do so, however, she was stopped by Orochimaru's assistant, Kabuto Yakushi.


text: What type of listing is this? For Sale What are you trying to sell/buy/trade? Panasonic GX8 & 12-35mm f/2.8 lens **EDIT - price down!** What are your prices? $1220 Where are you located? Other Where are you willing to to ship? Other Description Panasonic GX8 (black): Very good, like new condition, only used sparingly. Box & papers, original strap, body cap are included. The camera menu is in English & Chinese. US$600 Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8: Very good, like new condition, only used sparingly. Box & papers, front and rear caps, lens hood and a bonus filter is included. US$620 The camera and lens were bought about four months ago, they are still in very good condition as you can see in the pictures. They were my first M43 kit, and I've decided the system wouldn't really work for my lifestyle/the things that I shoot. If you would like to buy both, send me a PM and we can work out a deal for you. I'm located in Japan and will ship using EMS Japan to almost any countries in the world. The battery of GX8 will be removed from the package as it is not allowed by Japan Post. Payment accepted Regular PayPal (buyer adds 3% for this option), Personal/Gift PayPal (violates PayPal policy and no buyer protection) Shipping method Other Shipping charge $30 Handling time 2 business days References Additional comments Open to reasonable offers below asking price, Buyer must have a PayPal confirmed address, Will only ship to the address indicated on PayPal payment Acknowledgement I have read and agree to the Buy and Sell rules.


text:
Seeking Surgical Oncologist in Albuquerque, NM
Marshfield Clinic is overseen by an 11-member physician Board of Directors and a physician executive director.
MaryEllen Locher Breast Center We are the Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center and provider of choice within southeastern TN and Northern GA.
As Banner Health's employed physician group with more than 1,300 physicians and advanced practitioners across more than 65 specialities, BMG, is transforming the delivery of care.
BC/BE fellowship-trained breast surgeon or surgical oncologist with a strong interest in breast surgery.
Surgical Oncologist Needed | Los Angeles Metro | NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center
Surgical Oncologist New Jersey
The Department of Surgery at the University of Vermont College of Medicine and the University of Vermont Medical Center is excited to announce a search for a clinician scientist leader in cancer surgical specialties.
Thousands of new jobs posted every day. Let us bring them to you. Sign up for alerts.


text:
Check in from 12h / Check out prior to 12h
Hotel Caribe Ibiza: Find photos, reviews, information, amenities and compare prices for 3 stars hotels in Santa Eularia des Riu, Spain.
Situated in Santa Eularia des Riu, Hotel Caribe Ibiza is within a 35-minute drive of Ibiza Airport and provides a rooftop terrace. It also offers a 24-hour reception, a sun tanning bed and a playground.
Hotel description
The hotel has 265 rooms and has been recently refurbished. A fitness centre is available to guests wanting to keep up their exercise regimes while away. The multilingual staff will make sure guests have a comfortable and enjoyable stay at the hotel.
Guests can sit down to breakfast each morning at Hotel Caribe Ibiza.
Hotel features
Restaurant, Air Conditioned
Elevator / Lift, 24 Hour Reception, Conference Room(s), Currency Exchange, Multilingual Staff, Safe-Deposit Box, Luggage Storage
Fitness Room/Gym, Tour Desk, Garden, Playground
Games Available
Availability and Prices
Booking Site
Room Type
Per room
Per night
Per night
Users who viewed Hotel Caribe Ibiza also viewed these 3 stars Santa Eularia des Riu hotels:
Agroturismo Ca n'Arabi
Torrent Es S/N, Santa Eularia des Riu
Torrent Es S/N, Santa Eularia des Riu
Sirenis Hotel Playa Imperial Ibiza
Apartado Correos 175 Cala Llonga Santa Eulalia del Rio, Santa Eularia des Riu
Apartado Correos 175 Cala Llonga Santa Eulalia del Rio, Santa Eularia des Riu
Ácora Ibiza
Mestral, 3 - S'Argamassa, Santa Eularia des Riu
Mestral, 3 - S'Argamassa, Santa Eularia des Riu
Search hotels
based on


text:
- length: Floor Length
- Fabric: Chiffon
- back style: Back Zip
- neckline: Sweetheart
Ginette is a floor-length bridesmaid dress in an A-line cut in exquisite chiffon. It features a strapless sweetheart neckline with a front gather and cascading ruffles. Available in full size range (A0-A30) and custom sizing.


text:
average rating: -- / 10
Real lampy hybrydowe act power blast away inside 6:30 pm where the main fastener power be extant alive with together with some genius salt wrestling shoplift.
Rating received by this member ( 0 )
This member has no ratings yet.
Ratings given by this member ( 0 )
This member has not given any ratings yet.
I wanna cook
Cooking something?
Whatever it is, sell a few portions on Super Marmite! It's a great way to interact with your local community and to get real feedback on your cuisine :)Post a meal


text:
THIS IS A DIRECTORY PAGE. Britannica does not currently have an article on this topic.
Learn about this topic in these articles:
discussed in biography
English monk, usually accepted as the author of Chronicon ex chronicis, which is valuable for late Anglo-Saxon and early post-Conquest history. Its basis is the universal history (from the creation to 1082) compiled by Marianus Scotus, an Irish recluse at Mainz. The author of the Chronicon, like Marianus, was a careful annalist with a marked interest in chronology. He supplements...