text:
Is your Daewoo Radiator leaking? Need Sealant, or a Radiator Flush? Our local Daewoo specialists will help.
Enter Your Registration to get competitive local repair quotes today!
Is your Daewoo Radiator leaking? Need Sealant, or a Radiator Flush? Our local Daewoo specialists will help.
They called me the day I received the quote, offering to fit me in the next day. I dropped the car off first thing in the morning and picked it up early afternoon. Whilst it does not look much from the outside, the service and quality were impeccable and so fast!! This will be my new "go-to" garage!
recommend the service, top price and professionally installed . Everything done in a short time
Very honest, fair and a pleasure to deal with.. The work was perfect and just as described.. The garage may look a bit messy but don't be put off..
Very good job done on my car, and brought it back to life
Good price for the service. It did take longer than expected because i got some wrong parts and had to order others but it was okay as the staff where very friendly ! Owner kept in contact with me with other problems during my service. I was suprised when i asked ' should i change this part' and they said no, the brake pads are still good. I was expecting them to get more money out of me but the mechanics are a decent group of boys. Thanks! Id reccomend this garage.
Good and friendly people. Fast and good skilled brake pads and disks replacement.
Repair works done on side edge of passenger and drivers door, looks new after repairs. However inside of car was covered in dust , would have been good if they covered the interior first before completing the works
Repair works done on side edge of passenger and drivers door, looks new after repairs. However inside of car was covered in dust , would have been good if they covered the interior first before completing the works
excellent service, however the diagnosis wrote off the fault prematurely, and respect the honest service, great feedback. unfortunately i was lucky 4th time round at another garage with more experience, don't be put off, these guys are decent
I thought the service was excellent. After accepting the quote I received a call from the garage within an hour and got my car booked in for the next day. Even though my car needed a part, it was still fixed on the same day. Very happy, would recommend.
Car repair was done to good standard (slight delay in getting it back from them due to paint shop issues) They were polite and kept me informed throughout. Polite and friendly. Not dealership level repair but good enough for the price.
Always a pleasure dealing with these guys as legit as they come, I would recommend they be your first choice you won't be disappointed. First class service.
Brilliant garage. I needed this wing mirror very quickly as I had to go Glastonbury the next day and these guys got it done straight away. They were also friendly, honest and as someone who's had a lot of bad experiences with garage these awesome guys put me at ease. Not to mention the price was very reasonable considering some chain garages were quoting me over double! Will never going anywhere else now! Thanks again :)
Prompt and efficient service
Very friendly and prompt service, really happy with the job. I've used these guys a few times now and will definitely use them again.
This is an excellent local garage that I wish was more local to me - but worth the journey. Joe, who runs the office side of the business, is brilliant and reassuring (my car is extremely old). There were clear explanations at every stage and all the work was fast and efficient. I highly recommend this garage
Efficient service, repair as requested, competitive price, car left clean etc. Recommended
Efficient service, repair as requested, competitive price, car left clean etc. Recommended
job was not done by this garage .not saying garage is not good just did not use them
very good service, kept informed of all works that car needed with costs agreed.very professional to deal with and will use again.
Did not use the garage
Nobody contacted me the garage did not even call me and this is two attempts to use a service from this site with no one getting back to arrange an appointment had to use Kwikfit to get my car done
Very good service
its very good i got good service
Job was quick, unbeatable prices. But, my dash board computer was not reset. Because of that I'll give 4 of 5.Apart from that great work, great price.
New clutch, one new tyre and a few other little bits, highly recommend, good service and kept me updated throughout
Alex was friendly and informative, I would recommend this garage. My car was fixed within 24 hours which was great and as an extra bonus i was also provided a courtesy car which was very handy. This garage will be my go-to garage from now. Thank you very much.
absolutely superb service from Alex. highly recommended and i will continue to use for all my cars. the guy was very honest and fair and treated us better then most main dealers. Southgate motor engineering is a example to how all garages should do business.customer for life
had my car remapped stage 1 from 122 bhp - 142 bhp Made a really nice change to the car with the extra power, great work at a great garage, would recommend 100%
Absolutely brilliant service. Quoted and delivered work faster than expected. Would definitely recommend.


text:
June 14, 1995: The Hubble telescope has detected a long-sought population of comets dwelling at the icy fringe of the solar system. The observation, which is the astronomical equivalent to finding the proverbial needle-in-a-haystack, bolsters proof for a primordial comet reservoir just beyond Neptune. The circles pinpoint one of the candidate Kuiper belt objects. The dotted lines represent a possible orbit that this Kuiper belt comet is following.
Based on the Hubble observations, a team of astronomers estimate that the belt contains at least 200 million comets, which have remained essentially unchanged since the birth of the solar system 4.5 billion years ago.See the rest:
Credit: A. Cochran (University of Texas) and NASA

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Ezra Levant talks to guest Sean Reid about Dalton McGuinty's new tax on certain tradespeople, including barbers.
This report aired on The Source July 26 2012.
Raw milk advocate and dairy farmer Michael Schmidt, and his lawyer, Karen Selick, receive a small court victory today in their battle against udder nonsense.
This report aired on The Source July 26 2012.
Ezra Levant takes BC Premier Christy Clark to task for asking for a 'fair share' and trying to unjustly exploit the oilsands.
This report aired on The Source July 26 2012.
Economist and author, David Goldman, on how the economic fallout from the Arab Spring is like a modern-day plague for Egypt.
This report aired on The Source July 25 2012.
Republican Congressman Lee Terry on his renewed fight to get Keystone XL construction going without presidential permission.
This report aired on The Source July 25 2012.
Christy Clark's recent comments and stance against the pipelines put her in direct conflict with both the nation and the constitution.
This report aired on The Source July 25 2012.
Ezra Levant lauds David 'The Menzoid' Menzies' recent sting which shows political correctness is dangerous for Canada and allows laws to be broken.
This report aired on The Source July 24 2012.
John Robson joins Ezra Levant to discuss why it is a bad idea to let China buy up too much of a stake in Alberta's oilsands.
This report aired on The Source July 24 2012.
Firearms expert, John Lott, shoots down the hysteria over calls for more gun control following the mass shootings in Aurora and Scarborough.
This report aired on The Source July 24 2012.
Should B.C. be able to stop Alberta from having access to the Pacific Ocean?
When that happens between different countries, it's called an act of war.
Alberta and B.C. are the closest of friends in a united Canada, not different countries. But you wouldn't know it from yesterday's announcement by B.C. Premier Christy Clark to extort money out of Alberta in return for "letting" Alberta have access to the Pacific.
Clark said that if Alberta oil companies don't pay her a "fair share" of oilsands money, she's going to block the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline to the west coast.
Could you imagine if a local politician, back in the 1880s, didn't want the Canadian Pacific Railway to go through, or in the 1950s didn't want the Trans-Canada Highway to go through – unless the trains or trucks stopped and paid a big toll?
It's illegal under our constitution, of course – the federal government, with its larger vision and responsibilities, gets to make those decisions.
If the federal government doesn't ensure fair transit across the country, the results are disastrous – like what happened to Newfoundland and Labrador, with the Churchill Falls power plant.
That large power plant is completely within Labrador. But to get their power out, they had to go through Quebec.
And so the Quebec government had them blocked in. And they took advantage.
They wouldn't let the plant export their power – they forced them to sell to Quebec under extremely cheap terms. And to this day, Quebec just resells that power to the U.S. at a huge profit.
According to former premier Danny Williams, Hydro Quebec makes about $1.7 billion a year off the plant. And Newfoundland makes $63 million a year.
And that's locked in for a 65-year contract.
That's what Clark wants to do with Alberta oil.
That's un-Canadian. It's unconstitutional. It's unfair. It's un-neighbourly.
What would Canada would be like if every province started to play that game? Let's start with the Port of Vancouver – the biggest port in Canada. It's the entry point for pretty much everything sailing in from Asia to the rest of the country – every Japanese car, every Chinese iPhone and flat screen TV.
But to get from the Port of Vancouver to the rest of Canada, you've got to go through Alberta by rail or highway.
What if Alberta decided to demand a toll on anything coming or going to the Port of Vancouver? Say, a $10,000 tax per train or a $1,000 toll per 18-wheeler that crosses pristine Alberta soil?
How many people have been killed on Alberta highways because of semi-trailers racing to or from Vancouver? How many train derailments – including trains carrying toxic chemicals – must Alberta endure, just to make B.C. even richer? That's crazy talk -- but it's exactly what Clark is saying.
According to government statistics, the Port of Vancouver generates 53,100 jobs. But 47,700 are for B.C. – just 1,800 for Alberta. To use Clark's words, why should B.C. get all the rewards, and Alberta take all the risks?
Is this what Alberta's Alison Redford meant by a National Energy Strategy?
And is this what Stephen Harper has in mind for inter-provincial trade and national unity?
This column appeared in the Sun Chain July 24 2012.
Tarek Fatah answers why it's not Islamophobic for severely normal Canadians to want to keep Khadr out of Canada.
This report aired on SunTV July 23 2012.
Ezra Levant points out the hypocrisy and opportunism of BC Premier Christy Clark's demands to support the construction of the Northern Gateway Pipeline.
This report aired on SunTV July 23 2012.
Lorrie Goldstein on the politics of pipelines and why it's nonsense for politicians to want absolute energy security with zero environmental risk.
This report aired on SunTV July 23 2012.
This is important for three reasons.
First, it's shocking that the U.S. government has withheld this critical information about Khadr's dangerousness from Canada, despite wanting to pawn off this murderer from their jail onto our streets.
Second, it's an encouraging sign that Toews will not be railroaded into taking Khadr by the left-wing media-legal industrial complex in Canada, which has all concluded the celebrity terrorist is a hero, and we Canadians are the evil ones.
Rather than making a political decision, Toews is applying the law - which requires him to assess the dangerousness of Khadr before allowing him in.
Third, it's a diplomatic incident. Two years ago, U.S. President Barack Obama pressured Canada into agreeing to take Khadr, even though Khadr murdered a U.S. army medic, and was tried in a U.S. court.
For the Canadian government to now request this information is a rebuke to the U.S., indicating that we know they withheld information from us - and we're not going to pretend they didn't.
That takes boldness - and surely required the approval of the prime minister.
The videotapes of Khadr will surely be fascinating - Dr. Michael Welner, America's leading forensic psychiatrist, spent hundreds of hours researching everything about Khadr, and then talked with him, on camera, for eight hours.
Aren't you curious to see that? Before we dump that murderer back on our streets?
Another leading expert, a psychologist named Alan Hopewell, also interviewed Khadr on tape.
Determining whether or not Khadr is dangerous isn't optional. It's required by the International Transfer of Offenders Act. Section 10(1) of the law gives Toews a checklist, including whether:
( a ) ... the offender's return to Canada will constitute a threat to the security of Canada;
( b ) ... the offender's return to Canada will endanger public safety;
( c ) ... the offender is likely to continue to engage in criminal activity after the transfer;
( d ) ... the offender left or remained outside Canada with the intention of abandoning Canada as their place of permanent residence;
( e ) whether, in the Minister's opinion, the foreign entity or its prison system presents a serious threat to the offender's security or human rights;
( f ) ...the offender has social or family ties in Canada;
( g ) ...the offender has refused to participate in a rehabilitation or reintegration program;
( h ) ...the offender has accepted responsibility for the offence for which they have been convicted, including by acknowledging the harm done to victims and to the community.
And section 10(2)(a) checks if "...the offender will, after the transfer, commit a terrorism offence or criminal organization offence."
Khadr doesn't just trip one or two of these wires. He is covered by all of them.
He is exceedingly dangerous. He is more jihadist than ever - even refusing to meet with liberal Muslim chaplains sent to him at Guantanamo Bay. He has refused to acknowledge that what he did was wrong, or that his father's terrorism before him was wrong. He has a Rolodex of hundreds of fellow terrorists who have been his friends for 10 years - 600 of whom have been released, many of whom are back committing terrorism.
He has no ties to Canada other than his sister and mother in Toronto who are unrepentant supporters of al-Qaida, who are egging him on, encouraging him to continue as a terrorist, to pick up where his dad left off.
If Omar Khadr isn't kept out by this list of warning factors, then no criminal can ever be kept out, because there will never be another prisoner who is more in violation of these rules than Khadr is.
Bravo to Vic Toews for standing up to Omar Khadr - and Khadr's fifth column in our Canadian society.
This column was written for Sun News July 21 2012
Jason Kenney tells Ezra Levant why the government is going to do due dilligence before allowing Omar Khadr to return.
This report aired on The Source July 20 2012.
Ezra Levant looks at how the Canadian government took the right first step in keeping Omar Khadr out of Canada.
This report aired on The Source July 20 2012.
Jason Loftus of The Epoch Times on marking the 13th anniversary of the Chinese regime's persecution of the Falun Gong people.
This report aired on The Source July 20 2012.
That information included:
1. An eight-hour videotaped interview of Khadr, conducted by leading forensic psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner; 2. A 63-page report by Dr. Welner; and 3. Dr. Welner's testimony in court.
That eight-hour video tape is still being suppressed by the U.S. government, but here are the other two documents referred to above -- information that the Canadian government did not have when it was pressed to accept the prison transfer.
Khadr Report
Khadr Report - 5 Jul 10.pdf
Dr. Welner Testimony
Dr Welner Testimony Draft RELEASED.PDF
Anti-Khadr meeting draws 200 people
TORONTO -- Shoban Kapoor is terrified to have a terrorist like Omar Khadr walking the streets of Toronto, so she started an online petition to keep him out.
Khadr, now 26, was sentenced at Guantanamo Bay to 40 years in jail for terrorist activities, but under a plea deal he only had to serve eight.
After spending one additional year at Guantanamo, he became eligible to serve the remainder of his sentence in Canada.
Ezra Levant looks at how Guantanamo Bay prisoners return to terrorism, despite what the main-stream media thinks.
This report aired on The Source July 19 2012.
Gun control expert, John Lott, debunks myths that banning handguns reduce crime.
This report aired on The Source July 19 2012.
A feminist's response to the Muslim street preacher who says women should be fined for dressing provactively.
This report aired on The Source July 19 2012.
Ezra Levant looks at how the problems of First Nations communities lies in their chiefs' mismanagement of funds.
This report aired on The Source July 18 2012.
Imam Atangana defends his position that Canadian laws give too much freedom to women and their clothing leads to their rape.
This report aired on The Source July 18 2012.
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice, MP Kerry-Lynne Findlay, denounces Imam Atangana's comments on behalf of the Conservative government.
This report aired on The Source July 18 2012.
Ezra Levant goes after the media party for not only reamining silent in the face of the hate being preached on Toronto streets, but even criticizing the Sun for reporting on it.
This report aired on The Source July 18 2012.
Riddell made the donation at the request of Preston Manning, another Calgarian. The idea was to set up a non-partisan school to train political campaign managers. Ottawa seemed the place to do it.
It's called the Graduate Program in Political Management, or GPPM. Anyone can apply — not just conservatives like Manning and Riddell. In fact, paragraph 14(b) of the donation contract Riddell signed when he gave Carleton the money established an oversight committee that guaranteed the program "exposes students to the partisan nature of the political environment from a cross-partisan perspective."
The school was the vision of Manning and his non-partisan Manning Centre for Building Democracy. It's a noble thing, building democracy. And teaching would-be campaign managers skills and ethics is a good thing. But the donation still offended the hard left-wing union called the Canadian Association of University Teachers. They're so extremist they actually sent $20,000 of their union members' money to Quebec to help fund the student protests out there. There is virtually no left-wing cause that CAUT doesn't support — from the Gaza Strip to the general strike in Spain against cutbacks there. But they don't believe others should be allowed to be political, if they're conservative. And so they have demanded that Carleton reject Riddell's donation.
And, being typically spineless bureaucrats, Carleton seems to be complying with CAUT's busy-body demands. They're renegotiating their contract with Riddell.
It's bizarre stacked on top of bizarre. CAUT is outrageously partisan — denouncing politicians they don't like by name, funding political groups. So it's clear they're not against politics on campus — they're just against politics they don't agree with.
But the deeper weirdness here is that the Riddell gift is contractually bound to be non-partisan. And students who study there say they can't detect a bias — in fact, if anything, it's non-conservative.
Here's my advice to Riddell: Take your money and run.
You cannot reform Carleton, or any other Canadian university. There's a reason it's called university and not "diversity." Because they don't allow different points of view anymore.
Do you really think all of the politicized university departments that have sprung up over the past 25 years — women's studies, peace studies, environmental studies, vegetarian studies — are genuine places of open-minded inquiry and debate? Of course not — they are permanent, tax-paid political campaigns. They train political operatives just like Riddell wants to do. But these faculties teach a left-wing dogma, and brook no dissent.
And they're vicious in their peer pressure. Try getting tenure if you're a scholar who disputes the theory of man-made global warming. But unlike most of the Media Party, they're all unionized government bureaucrats, too. Which is why Canada's public sector professors are the highest paid in the world, according to a new study by Boston College.
Left wing, job-for-life, unionized, leftist, political pundits, working eight months a year. That's most of liberal arts these days. Riddell should take his money and split it up amongst 30 different Canadian conservative groups — the Fraser Institute, the Frontier Centre, the Canadian Constitution Foundation, even my favourite, EthicalOil.org. It wouldn't be vetoed by leftist unions, frittered away on six-figure professor salaries or sucked up by massive overhead.
And, in the end, it would probably achieve more for the Canadian greater good than anything a dinosaur university ever could.
This column appeared in the Sun Chain July 17 2012.
Raheel Raza reacts to the Muslim street preacher who says Canadian women have too much freedom and their rape is justifiable because of the clothes they wear.
This report aired on The Source July 16 2012.
Ezra reveals the Media Party bias in their coverage of a teenager getting booted from the Kenney event over the weekend.
This report aired on The Source July 16 2012.
swollen tube clogged ear
ear drops for a clogged tube
natural remedies clogged tube
poor tube function tympanoplasty
eustachian tube pain in neck
patulous eustachian tube and wikipedia
eustachian tube dysfunction pain relief
structure does tube lead frog
florida wind mitigation bracing gable ends
does eustachian tube frog do
chiropractic care prevents eustachian tube dysfunciton
names of eustachian ear tubes
omnaris and eustachian tube or retraced
inflamation eustachian tube middle ear
eustachian tube function test interpretation
function eustachian tube openings frog
eustachian tube irritation after surgery
clogged tube ear ringing
eustachian tubes sense of balance
middle ear clogged tube
structure does eustachian tube lead frog
cure for eustachian tube dysfunction
eustachian tube dysfunction and swallow
eustachian tube dysfunction pain behind ear
eustachian tube dysfunction barometric pressure changes
clogged tube ear ringing
compare contrast frog human eustachian tube
difference between eustachian tube frog human
ct image of tube opening
treatment for dysfunctional tube
blocked eustachian tube and tinnitus
clogged eustachian tube home remedy
eustachian tube infection home remedies
drunk and the tube
tube pain in throat
compare contrast frog human eustachian tube
blocked eustachian tube pain in jaw
eustachian tube dysfunction nasal rinse
clogged eustachian tube home remedy
public transport from heathrow to cromer
tube function and location
blocked ear remedy eustachian tube
eustachian tube function in children
causes of tube dysfunction in adults
ear pain eustachian tube dysfunction
symptoms of clogged tube
clogged eustachian tube ear ringing
natural cures for tube dysfunction
blocked eustachian tube naturopathic remedy
remedies for babies eustachian tubes
barbar stringham clackamas county clerk
mutter family in philadelphia pa 1859
tube bothered by allergies
eustachian tube dysfunction natural cure
toynbee test eustachian tube function
protest action to martin torrijos espino
ear drops for a clogged tube
does eustachian tube frog lead
blocked eustachian tube symptoms dizziness
can zyrtec help eustachian tube dysfunction
blocked eustachian tube treatment natural
ear pain eustachian tube dysfunction
blocked eustachian tube symptoms dizziness
eustachian tube dysfunction nasal steroid
muscles and nerves surrounding tube
eustachian tube dysfunction etd seizure
Ezra Levant discusses Barack Obama's idea of campaigning, and his thoughts about achieving the American dream when he doesn't have a teleprompter.
This report aired on The Source July 16 2012.


text:
Skip to Main Navigation
Skip to booking
Skip To Global navigation
Skip To Top menu
Skip To Booking API
Plan & Book
Book Flight
Payment Options
Flight Status
Special Promotions
Student & Senior Citizens Offer
Book Cars
Book Hotel
Passport & Visa
Baggage Information
Group Request
Travel Extras
Kids & Infant
Baggage Allowance
Infants Per Flight
Onboard Facilities
Unaccompanied Minors
Special Request & Services
Oxygen Service
Service Animals
Wheelchair Service
Meal Selection
Seat Assignments
Travel to and from the us
Customer care
Customer Service Plan
Contingency Plan
Passport & Visa
Check - in option & Times
Special Needs
Unaccompanied minors
Compassionate fare
Baggage Claim
Travel Tips
Travel Refunds
Forms of Payment
Types of Refunds
Loyalty Programmes
Club Caribbean
Application Fees
Member Guides
Caribbean Miles
Account Login
Applicable Fees and Surcharges
Authorization to link account
Redemption Table
Merger of Caribbean Miles & 7th Heaven
Earn Miles Table
Upgrade Miles Table
News and Updates
Our Partners
Programme Details
Forgot Password
Forget Frequent Flyer Number:
Terms and Conditions
Add Nominee
Miles Transfer
Product & Services
Cargo & Jet Pak
Duty Free
How to pre-order
Preorder Form
Our Network
Our Services
Dangerous Goods
Human Remains
Live Animals
Fish and SeaFood
Subscribe Here
General Conditions of Carriage (2)
General Conditions of Carriage
Date Published: 26th May, 2014
Article I - DEFINITIONS
Article II - APPLICABILITY
Article III - TICKETS
Article IV - STOPOVERS
Article V - FARES AND CHARGES
Article VI - RESERVATIONS
Article VII - CHECK-IN
Article VIII - REFUSAL OF AND
Article IX - BAGGAGE
Article X - SCHEDULES, CANCELLATION OF FLIGHTS
Article XI - REFUND
Article XII - CONDUCT ABOARD AIRCRAFT
Article XIII - ARRANGEMENTS BY CARRIER
Article XIV - ADMINISTRATIVE FORMALITIES
Article XV - SUCCESSIVE CARRIERS
Article XVI - LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE
Article XVII - TIME LIMITATION ON CLAIMS
Article XVIII - MODIFICATION AND WAIVER
Agreed Stopping Places
means those places, except the place of departure and the place of destination, set forth in the Ticket or shown in the Carrier's time table as scheduled stopping places on the passenger's route.
Authorized Agent
means a passenger sales agent who has been appointed by Carrier to represent the Carrier in the sale of air passenger transportation over the services of the Carrier and, when authorized, over the services of other air carriers.
Baggage means
such articles, effects and other personal property of a passenger as are necessary or appropriate for his or her wear, use, comfort or convenience in connection with the trip. Unless otherwise specified, it includes both checked and unchecked baggage of the passenger.
Baggage Check
means those portions of the Ticket that relate to the carriage of the passenger's checked baggage.
Baggage Identification Tag
means a document issued by Carrier solely for identification of checked baggage.
includes the air carrier issuing the Ticket and air carriers that carry or undertake to carry the passenger and/or his or her baggage thereunder.
Carrier's Regulations
means rules, other than these Conditions, published by Carrier and in effect on date of Ticket issue, governing carriage of passengers and/or baggage and shall include applicable tariffs in force.
Checked Baggage
means baggage of which Carrier takes sole custody and for which Carrier has issued a baggage check.
Conjunction Ticket
means a Ticket issued to a passenger in conjunction with another Ticket which together constitute a single contract of carriage.
means whichever of the following instruments is applicable to the contract of carriage:
-the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed at Warsaw 12 October 1929 (hereinafter referred to as the Warsaw Convention);
-the Warsaw Convention as amended at The Hague on 28 September 1955;
-the Guadalajara Supplementary Convention of 18 September 1961;
-the Warsaw Convention as amended by Additional Protocol No. 1 of Montreal 1975;
-the Warsaw Convention as amended at The Hague 1955 and by Additional Protocol No. 2 of Montreal 1975;
-the Warsaw Convention as amended at The Hague 1955 and by Additional Protocol No. 3 of Montreal 1975;
-a combination of the aforementioned Conventions and Protocols;
-the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, signed in Montreal on 28 May 1999.
includes death, injury, delay, loss, partial loss or damage of whatsoever nature arising out of or in connection with carriage or other services performed by Carrier incidental thereto.
means calendar days, including all seven days of the week; provided that, for the purpose of notification, the day upon which notice is dispatched shall not be counted; and for the purpose of determining duration of validity, the day upon which the Ticket is issued or the flight commenced shall not be counted.
Electronic Coupon
means an electronic Flight Coupon or other value document held in Carrier's database.
Flight Coupon
means that portion of the Ticket that bears the notation 'good for passage', or in the case of an Electronic Ticket, the Electronic Coupon, and indicates the particular places between which passengers is entitled to be carried.
means any person, except members of the crew, carried or to be carried on an aircraft with the consent of the Carrier.
Passenger Coupon or Passenger Receipt
means that portion of the Ticket issued by or on the behalf of Carrier, which is so marked and which ultimately is to be retained by the passenger.
means a deliberate interruption of a journey by the passenger, at a point between the place of departure and the place of destination, which has been agreed to in advance by the Carrier.
means the itinerary or receipt issued by or on behalf of the Carrier, the Electronic Coupon and, if applicable, a boarding document, Ticket issued by or on the behalf of Carrier and includes the Conditions of Contract and notices as well as the flight and passenger coupons contained therein.
Qualified Service Animal
means a service animal, including emotional support or psychiatric service animals, accompanied by sufficient documentation from a licensed medical or mental health professional of the passenger's need for the animal. "Sufficient documentation" for this purpose means:
current documentation (i.e., not older than one year from the date of the passenger's scheduled initial flight) on the letterhead of a licensed mental health professional (e.g., psychiatrist, psychologist, licensed clinical social worker, including a medical doctor specifically treating the passenger's mental or emotional disability) stating the following:
(1) The passenger has a mental or emotional disability recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Fourth Edition (DSM IV);
(2) The passenger needs the emotional support or psychiatric service animal as an accommodation for air travel and/or for activity at the passenger's destination;
(3) The individual providing the assessment is a licensed mental health professional, and the passenger is under his or her professional care; and
(4) The date and type of the mental health professional's license and the state or other jurisdiction in which it was issued.
Unchecked Baggage
means any baggage of the passenger other than checked baggage.
1. (a) Except as provided in paragraphs 2, 3, 4, and 5 of this Article, these Conditions of Carriage apply to all carriage by air of passengers and baggage, performed by Carrier for reward.
(b) These Conditions also apply to gratuitous and reduced fare carriage except to the extent that Carrier has provided otherwise in its regulations or in the relevant contracts, passes or Tickets.
Carriage By Successive Carriers Under a Single Ticket or a Conjunction Ticket
2. (a) These Conditions of Carriage do not apply to air transportation on a carrier other than Caribbean Airlines and may conflict with conditions of successive carriers.
(b) Passengers should contact their local Caribbean Airlines office with specific questions about the applicability of these Conditions of Carriage.
3. If carriage is performed pursuant to a charter agreement, these Conditions of Carriage apply only to the extent they are incorporated by reference by the terms of the charter agreement and the charter Ticket.
Overriding Law
4. To the extent that any provision contained or referred to herein is contrary to anything contained in the Convention, where applicable and any applicable laws, tariffs on file, government regulations, orders or requirements that cannot be waived by agreement of the parties, such provision shall not apply. The invalidity of any provision shall not affect the validity of any other provision contained herein.
Conditions Prevail Over Regulations
5. Except as provided herein, in the event of inconsistency between these Conditions and Carrier's Regulations, these Conditions of Carriage shall prevail, except where tariff in force in the United States or Canada apply, in which case the tariffs shall prevail.
Tickets Prima facie Evidence of Contract
1. a) The Ticket constitutes prima facie evidence of the contract of carriage between Carrier and the passenger named on the Ticket. Carrier will provide carriage only to the passenger holding such Ticket or holding, as proof of payment or part payment, any other Carrier document issued by Carrier or its Authorized Agent.
Requirement for Ticket
b) A person shall not be entitled to be carried on a flight unless that person presents a Ticket valid and duly issued in accordance with Carrier's Regulations and containing the flight coupon for the flight and all other unused Flight Coupons and the Passenger Coupon. A passenger shall furthermore not be entitled to be carried if the Ticket presented has been altered otherwise than by Carrier or its Authorized Agent.
Ticket not Transferable
d) A Ticket is not transferable. If a Ticket is presented by someone other than the person entitled to be carried thereunder or to a refund in connection therewith, Carrier shall not be liable to the person so entitled if in good faith it provides carriage or makes refund to the person presenting the Ticket.
Period of Validity
2. a) A Ticket is valid for carriage for one (1) year from the date of commencement of travel or if no portion of the Ticket is used, from the date of issue thereof, except as otherwise provided in the Ticket, these Conditions of Carriage or Carrier's Regulations.
Extension of Validity
b) If a passenger is prevented from travelling within the period of validity of the Ticket because Carrier:
(i) cancels the flight on which the passenger holds a reservation; or
(ii) omits a scheduled stop, being the passenger's place of departure, place of destination or a stopover; or
(iii) fails to operate a flight reasonably according to schedule; or(iv) causes a passenger to miss a connection; or
(v) substitutes a different class of services; or
(vi) is unable to provide previously confirmed space
The validity of such passenger's Ticket will be extended until Carrier's first flight on which space is available in the class of service for which the fare has been paid.
(c) When a passenger holding a Ticket, is prevented from travelling within the period of validity of the Ticket because at the time such passenger requests reservations Carrier is unable to provide space on the flight, the validity of such passenger's Ticket will be extended in accordance with Carrier's Regulations.
(d) When a passenger after having commenced his or her journey is prevented from travelling within the period of validity of the Ticket by reason of illness, Carrier will extend, (provided such extension is not precluded by Carrier's Regulations applicable to the fare paid by the passenger) the period of validity of such passenger's Ticket until the date when passenger becomes fit to travel according to a medical certificate, or until the Carrier's first flight after such date from the point where the journey is resumed on which space is available in the class of service for which the fare has been paid. When the flight coupons remaining in the Tickets involve one or more Stopovers, the validity of such Ticket, subject to Carrier's Regulations, will be extended for not more than three (3) months from the date shown on such certificate. In such circumstances, Carrier will extend similarly the period of validity of Tickets of other members of the passenger's immediate family accompanying an incapacitated passenger.
Flight Coupon Sequence
3. A passenger's Ticket is no longer valid if the Coupons are not used in the sequence provided in the Ticket, for example if a passenger commences the journey at any point along the itinerary other than the point of origin. Should a passenger wish to change any aspect of his or her transportation he or she must contact Carrier in advance. The fare for the new transportation will be calculated subject to the conditions of the fare purchased and the passenger will be given the option of accepting the new price or maintaining the original transportation as ticketed.
Should the passenger be required to change any aspect of the transportation due to events beyond his or her control, the passenger must contact Carrier as soon as practicable and Carrier will use reasonable efforts to transport the passenger to the next Stopover or final destination, with a recalculation of the fare.
Should the passenger change his or her transportation without Carrier's agreement, Carrier will assess the correct price for the actual travel based on the rule conditions of the fare purchased. The passenger may have to pay any difference between the price he or she has paid and the total price applicable for the revised transportation. A refund may be applicable if the new price is lower but otherwise, the unused Coupons have no value. Failure to pay the price applicable to the revised transportation will result in refusal of carriage.
Name and Address of Carrier
4. Carrier's name may be abbreviated in the Ticket. Carrier's address shall be deemed to be the airport of departure shown opposite the first abbreviation of Carrier's name in the "Carrier" box in the Ticket.
Stopovers may be permitted at agreed stopping places subject to government requirements and Carrier's Regulations.
1. Fares apply only for carriage from the airport at the point of origin to the airport at the point of destination. Fares do not include ground transport services between airports and town terminals, unless provided by carrier without additional charge.
Applicable Fares
2. Applicable fares are those published, constructed in accordance with Carrier's Regulations. Subject to government requirements and Carrier's Regulations, the applicable fare is the fare for the flight or flights in effect on the date of commencement of the carriage covered by the first Flight Coupon of the Ticket. When the amount that has been collected is not the applicable fare, the difference shall be paid by the passenger or, as the case may be refunded by Carrier, in accordance with Carrier's Regulations.
3. Unless otherwise provided in the Carrier's Regulations, fares apply only to routings published in connection therewith. If there is more than one routing at the same fare, the passenger may specify the routing prior to issue of the Ticket. If no routing is specified, Carrier may determine the routing.
Taxes and Charges
4. Any tax or charge imposed by government or other authority, or by the operator of an airport, in respect of a passenger or the use by the passenger of any services or facilities will be in addition to the published fares and charges and shall be payable by the passenger, except as otherwise provided in Carrier's Regulations.
5. Fares and charges are payable in any currency acceptable to Carrier. When payment is made in a currency in which the fare is published, such payment will be made at the rate of exchange established in accordance with Carrier's Regulations.
Reservations Requirement
1. (a) Reservations are not confirmed until recorded as accepted by Carrier or its Authorized Agent.
(b) As provided in Carrier's Regulations, certain fares may have conditions which limit or exclude the passenger's right to change or cancel reservations.
Ticketing Time Limits
2. If the passenger has not paid for the Ticket (or made credit arrangements with Carrier) prior to the specified Ticketing time limit, Carrier may cancel the reservation.
Personal Data
3. The passenger recognizes that personal data has been given to Carrier for the purpose of making a reservation for carriage, obtaining ancillary services, facilitating immigration and entry requirements, and making available such data to government agencies. For these purposes the passenger authorizes Carrier to retain such data and to transmit it to its own offices, other carriers or the providers of such services, in whatever country they may be located. Carrier waives all liability under privacy and consumer data protection laws.
4. Carrier does not guarantee to provide any particular seat in the aircraft and the passenger agrees to accept any seat that may be allotted on the flight in the class of service for which the Ticket has been issued.
Recommendation of Reservations
5. Onward or return reservations may be subject to the requirements to reconfirm the reservation in accordance with and within the time limits specified in Carrier's Regulations. Failure to comply with any such requirements may result in cancellation of any onward or return reservations.
Cancellation of Onward Reservations made by Carrier
6. If a passenger does not use a reservation, subsequent flight reservations will not be valid and Carrier will not carry the passenger until it has calculated the revised fare for the actual transportation and the difference has been paid between the fare already paid and the revised fare which applies to the changed transportation. If the revised fare is lower than the fare already paid, the Carrier may refund the passenger the difference, less any applicable administration fee(s).
Check-in means the use of any automated process such as virtual check-in, Web Check-in at www.caribbean-airlines.com, airport kiosks, or face-to-face contact with a Carrier representative which changes the passenger's reserved seat status from reserved seat to checked-in. It is the passenger's responsibility to arrive at Carrier's check-in location and boarding gate sufficiently in advance of flight departure to permit completion of any Government formalities and departure procedures and in any event not later than the time that may be indicated by Carrier. Carrier recommends that a passenger arrive at Carrier's check-in location no less than four (4) hours prior to departure in the case of international transportation and no less than two (2) hours in the case of domestic transportation. If the passenger fails to arrive in time at the Carrier's check-in location or boarding gate or appears improperly documented and not ready to travel, Carrier may cancel the space reserved for the passenger and will not delay the flight. Carrier is not liable to the passenger for loss or expense due to the passenger's failure to comply with the provisions of this Article.
Right to Refuse Carriage
1. Carrier may refuse carriage of any passenger or passenger's baggage for reasons of safety or if, in the exercise of its reasonable discretion, Carrier determines that:
(a) such action is necessary to comply with any applicable laws, regulations or orders of any state or country to be flown from, into, or over; or
(b) the conduct, age, or mental or physical state of the passenger, except for disabled passengers and passengers with reduced mobility as defined in EC Regulation 1107/2006, is such as to:
(i) require special assistance of Carrier; or
(ii) cause discomfort or make himself or herself objectionable to other passengers; or
(iii) involve any hazard or risk to himself or herself or to other persons or to property; or
(c) such action is necessary because the passenger has failed to observe the instructions of Carrier; or
(d) the passenger has refused to submit to a security check; or
(e) the applicable fare or any charges or taxes payable have not been paid or credit arrangements agreed between Carrier and the passenger (or the person paying for the Ticket) have not been complied with; or
(f) the passenger does not appear to be properly documented; or
(g) the passenger may seek to enter a country through which he or she is in transit; or
(h) the passenger may destroy his or her documentation during the flight; or
(i) the passenger will not surrender travel documents to be held by the flight crew, against receipt, when so requested by the Carrier; or
(j) the Ticket presented by the passenger:
(i) has been acquired unlawfully or has been purchased from an entity other than the issuing Carrier or its Authorized Agent, or
(ii) any flight coupon has been altered by anyone other than Carrier or its Authorized Agent and Carrier reserves the right to retain such Tickets; or
(k) the person presenting the Ticket cannot prove he or she is the person named in the "Name of Passenger" box, and Carrier reserves the right to retain such Ticket.
Limitation on Carriage
2. Acceptance for carriage of unaccompanied children, incapacitated persons, pregnant women or persons with illness may be subject to prior arrangement with Carrier, in accordance with Carrier's Regulations. Subject to the provisions of EC Regulation 1107/2006 on the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air, where applicable, acceptance for carriage of unaccompanied children, incapacitated persons, persons who are disabled or have reduced mobility, pregnant women, persons with illness or other people with special needs requiring special assistance is subject to prior arrangement with Carrier. Passengers with disabilities who have advised Carrier of any special requirements they may have at the time of ticketing, and been accepted by Carrier, shall not subsequently be refused carriage on the basis of such disability or special requirements.
Items Unacceptable as Baggage
1. (a) The passenger shall not include in his or her baggage:
(i) items which do not constitute baggage as defined in Article I hereof;
(ii) items which are likely to endanger the aircraft or persons or property on board the aircraft, such as those specified in the International Civil Aviation (ICAO) Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations, and in Carrier's Regulations (further information is available from Carrier on request);
(iii) items the carriage of which is prohibited by the applicable laws, regulations or orders of any state to be flown from, to, or over;
(iv) items which in the opinion of Carrier are unsuitable for carriage by reason of their weight, size or character, such as fragile or perishable items; or
(v) live animals except as provided for in Paragraph 10 of this Article.
(b) Firearms and ammunition other than for hunting and sporting purposes are prohibited from carriage as baggage. Firearms and ammunitions for hunting and sporting purposes may be accepted as checked baggage in accordance with Carrier's Regulations. Firearms must be unloaded with the safety catch on, and suitably packed. Carriage of ammunition is subject to ICAO and IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.
(c) The passenger shall not include in checked baggage, fragile or perishable items, money, jewellery, precious metals, silverware, negotiable papers, securities or other valuables, business documents, passports and other identification documents or samples.
(d) Weapons such as antique firearms, swords, knives and similar items may be accepted as checked baggage, in accordance with Carrier's Regulations, but will not be permitted on the cabin.
(e) If any items referred to in this Article are carried, whether or not they are prohibited from carriage as baggage, the carriage thereof shall be subject to the charges, limitation of liability and other provisions of these Conditions of Carriage applicable to the carriage of baggage, and in the case of international carriage thereof shall be subject to the limitation of liability set out in the applicable Convention.
Right to Refuse Carriage
2. (a) Carrier may refuse carriage as baggage such items described in Paragraph 1 of this Article as prohibited from carriage as baggage and may refuse further carriage of any such items on discovery thereof.
(b) Carrier may refuse to carry as baggage any item because of its size, shape, weight or character.
(c) Unless advance arrangements for its carriage have been made with Carrier, Carrier may carry on later flights baggage which is in excess of the applicable free allowance.
(d) Carrier may refuse to accept baggage as checked baggage unless it is properly packed in suitcases or other suitable containers to ensure safe carriage with ordinary care in handling.
Right of Search
3. For reason of safety and security, Carrier may request the passenger to permit a search to be made of his or her baggage, and may search or have searched the passenger's baggage in his absence if the passenger is not available, for the purpose of determining whether he or she is in possession of or whether his or her baggage contains any item described in Paragraph 1(a) or any arms or munitions which have not been presented to Carrier in accordance with Paragraph 1(b) above. If the passenger is unwilling to comply with such request Carrier may refuse to carry the passenger or baggage.
Checked Baggage
4. (a) Upon delivery to Carrier of baggage to be checked, Carrier shall take custody thereof and issue a Baggage Identification Tag for each piece of checked baggage.
(b) If baggage has no name, initials or other personal identification, the passenger shall affix such identification to the baggage prior to acceptance.
(c) Checked baggage will be carried on the same aircraft as the passenger unless Carrier decides that this is impracticable, in which case Carrier will carry the checked baggage on Carrier's next flight on which space is available. Free Baggage Allowance
5. Passengers may carry free of charge baggage as specified and subject to the conditions and limitations of Carrier's Regulations.
Excess Baggage
6. A passenger shall pay a charge for the carriage of baggage in excess of the free baggage allowance at the rate and in the manner provided in Carrier's Regulations. Excess Value Declaration and Charge
7. (a) A passenger may declare a value of checked baggage in excess of the applicable liability limits. If the passenger makes such a declaration the passenger shall pay any applicable charges.
(b) Carrier will refuse to accept an excess value declaration on checked baggage when a portion of the carriage is to be provided by another Carrier which does not offer the facility.
Unchecked Baggage
8. (a) Baggage which the passenger carries onto the aircraft must fit under the seat in front of the passenger or in an enclosed storage compartment in the cabin. Items determined by Carrier to be of excessive weight or size will not be permitted in the cabin.
(b) Objects not suitable for transport in the cargo compartment (such as delicate musical instruments and the like) will only be accepted for transportation in the cabin compartment if due notice has been given in advance and permission granted by the Carrier. The transport of such objects may be charged for separately.
Collection and Delivery of Baggage
9. (a) The passenger shall collect his or her baggage as soon as it is available for collection at places of destination or stopover.
(b) Only the bearer of the Baggage Check and Identification Tag, delivered to the passenger at the time the baggage was checked, is entitled to delivery of baggage. Failure to exhibit the Baggage Identification Tag shall not prevent delivery provided the Baggage Check is produced and the baggage is identified by other means.
(c) If a person claiming the baggage is unable to produce the Baggage Check and identify the baggage by means of a Baggage Identification Tag, Carrier will deliver the baggage to such person only on the condition that he or she establishes to the Carrier's satisfaction his or her right thereto, and if required by Carrier, such person shall furnish adequate security to indemnify Carrier for any loss, damage or expense which may be incurred by Carrier as a result of such delivery.
(d) Acceptance of baggage by the bearer of the Baggage Check without complaint at the time of delivery is prima facie evidence that the baggage has been delivered in good condition and in accordance with the contract of carriage.
10. (a) Animals such as dogs, cats, household birds and other pets, when properly crated and accompanied by valid health and vaccination certificates, entry permit, and other documents required by countries of entry or transit will, with the advance agreement of Carrier, be accepted for carriage, subject to Carrier's Regulations;
(b) If accepted as baggage, the animals, together with its container and food carried, shall not be included in the free baggage allowance of the passenger but constitutes excess baggage, for which the passenger shall pay the applicable rate;
(c) Qualified Service animals accompanying sight/hearing impaired or physically handicapped passengers together with containers and food, will be carried free of charge in addition to the normal free baggage allowance, subject to Carrier's Regulations, and Carrier will take all steps necessary to ensure the legal transportation of qualified service animals, i.e., compliance with foreign animal health regulations to permit transportation of the animal from the U.S. into the foreign country;
(d) Acceptance of animals for carriage is subject to the condition that the passenger assumes full responsibility for such animal. Carrier shall not be liable for injury to or loss, delay, sickness or death of such animal in the event that it is refused entry into or passage through any country, state or territory.
1. Carrier undertakes to use its best efforts to carry the passenger and his or her baggage with reasonable dispatch and to adhere to published schedules in effect on the date of travel.
Cancellation, Changes of Schedule, etc
2. Except as otherwise provided by the Convention or applicable law including 14 C.F.R. Part 250, if due to circumstances beyond its control Carrier cancels or delays a flight, is unable to provide previously confirmed space, fails to stop at a passenger's stopover or destination point, or causes the passenger to miss a connecting flight on which the passenger holds a reservation included in the Ticket and known to Carrier, Carrier shall either:
(a) carry the passenger on another of its scheduled passenger services on which space is available; or
(b) re-route the passenger to the destination indicated on the Ticket or applicable portion thereof by its own scheduled services or the scheduled services of another carrier, or by the means of surface transportation. If the sum of the fare, excess baggage charge and any applicable service charge for the revised routing is higher than the refund value of the Ticket or applicable portion thereof, Carrier shall require no additional fare or charge from the passenger, and shall refund the difference if the fare and charges for the revised routing are lower; or
(c) make a refund in accordance with the provisions of Article XI; and shall be under no further liability to the passenger.
3. Except in the case of its acts or omissions done with intent to cause damage or recklessly and with knowledge that damage would result, Carrier shall not be liable for errors or omissions in timetables or other published schedules, or for representations made by employees, agents or representatives of Carrier as to the dates or times of departure or arrival or as to the operation of any flight.
1. On failure by Carrier to provide carriage in accordance with the contract of carriage, or where a passenger requests a voluntary change of his or her arrangements, refund for an unused Ticket or portion thereof shall be made by Carrier in accordance with this Article and with Carrier's Regulations.
Persons to Whom Refund Will be Made
2. (a) Except as hereinafter provided in this Article, Carrier shall be entitled to make refund either to the person named on the Ticket, or to the person who has paid for the Ticket upon presentation of satisfactory proof.
(b) If a Ticket has been paid for by a person other than the passenger named in the Ticket, and Carrier has indicated on the Ticket that there is a restriction on refund, Carrier shall make a refund only to the person paying for the Ticket or to another based upon that person's order.
(c) Refunds will only be made on surrender to Carrier of the passenger coupon or passenger receipt and surrender of all unused flight coupons.
(d) A refund made to anyone presenting the passenger coupon or passenger receipt and all unused Flight Coupons and holding himself or herself out as a person to whom a refund may be made in terms of subparagraph (a) and (b) shall be deemed a proper refund and shall discharge carrier from liability and further claim for a refund.
Involuntary Refunds
3. If Carrier cancels a flight, fails to operate a flight reasonably according to schedule, fails to stop at a point to which the passenger is destined or Ticketed to stop over, is unable to provide previously confirmed space or causes the passenger to miss a connecting flight on which the passenger holds a reservation, the amount of the refund shall be:
(a) if no portion of the Ticket has been used, an amount equal to fare paid;
(b) if a portion of the Ticket has been used, the refund will be higher of:
(i) the one way fare (less applicable discounts and charges) from point of interruption to destination or point of next stopover; or (ii) the difference between the fare paid and the fare for the transportation used.
Voluntary Refund
4. If the passenger wishes a refund of his or her Ticket, when permissible, for reasons other than those set out in Paragraph 3 of this Article, the amount of the refund shall be:
(a) if no portion of the Ticket has been used, an amount equal to the fare paid less any applicable service charges or cancellation fees; or
(b) if a portion of the Ticket has been used, the refund will be an amount equal to the difference between the fare paid and the applicable fare for travel between the points for which the Ticket has been used, less any applicable service charges or cancellation fees.
Right to Refuse Refund
5. (a) After the expiry of the validity of the Ticket, Carrier may refuse refund when application therefore is made later than the time prescribed in Carrier's Regulations.
(b) Carrier may refuse refund on a Ticket that has been presented to Carrier or to Government officials of a country as evidence of intention to depart therefrom, unless the passenger establishes to the Carrier's satisfaction that he or she has permission to remain in the country or that he or she will depart therefrom by another carrier or another means of transport.
6. All refunds will be subjected to Government laws, rules and regulations or orders of the country in which the Ticket was originally purchased and of the country in which the refund is being made. Subject to the foregoing provision, refunds will normally be made in the currency in which the Ticket was paid for but may be in another currency in accordance with Carrier's Regulations.
By Whom Ticket Refundable
7. Voluntary refunds will be made only by the Carrier that originally issued the Ticket or by its Agent if so authorized.
1. If the passenger conducts himself or herself aboard the aircraft so as to endanger the aircraft or any person or property on board, or obstructs the crew in the performance of their duties, or fails to comply with any instructions of the crew, behaves in a manner to which other passengers may reasonably object, Carrier may take such measures as it deems necessary to prevent continuation of such conduct, including restraint or removal of the passenger.
2. The passenger may not operate aboard the aircraft portable radios, electronic games or transmitting devices including radio controlled toys and walkie-talkies. The passenger shall not operate any other electronic devices on board without Carrier's permission except that portable recorders, hearing aids and heart pacemakers may be used.
If in the course of concluding the contract of carriage by air, Carrier also agrees to make arrangements for the provision of additional services, Carrier shall have no liability to the passenger except for its gross negligence or willful misconduct in making such arrangements.
1. The passenger shall be solely responsible for complying with all laws regulations, orders, demands and travel requirements of countries to be flown from, to or over, and with Carrier's Regulations and instruction. Carrier shall not be liable for any aid or information given by any Agent or employee of Carrier to any passenger in connection with obtaining necessary documents or visas or to comply with such laws, regulations, orders, demands, requirements, rules or instructions.
Travel Documents
2. The passenger shall present all exit, entry, health and other documents required by laws, regulations, orders, demands or requirements of the countries concerned, and permit Carrier to take and retain copies thereof. Carrier reserves the right to refuse carriage of any passenger who has not complied with applicable laws, regulations, orders, demands or requirements or whose documents do not appear to be in order, or who does not permit Carrier to take and retain copies thereof.
Refusal of Entry
3. The passenger agrees to pay the applicable fare whenever Carrier, on Government order, is required to return a passenger to his or her point of origin or elsewhere, owing to the passenger's inadmissibility into a country, whether of transit or of destination. Carrier may apply to the payment of such fare any funds paid to Carrier for unused carriage, or any funds of the passenger in the possession of Carrier. The fare collected for carriage to the point of refusal of entry or deportation will not be refunded by Carrier.
Passenger Responsible for Fines, Detention Costs, etc.
4. If Carrier is required to pay or deposit any fine or penalty or to incur any expenditure by reason of the passenger's failure to comply with laws, regulations, orders, demands and travel requirements of the countries concerned or to produce the required documents, the passenger shall on demand reimburse to Carrier any amount so paid or deposited and any expenditure so incurred. Carrier may use towards such expenditure any funds of the passenger in the possession of the Carrier.
Customs Inspection
5. If required, the passenger shall attend inspection of his or her baggage, checked or unchecked, by customs or Government officials. Carrier is not liable to the passenger for any loss or damage suffered by the passenger through failure to comply with this requirement.
Security Inspection
6. The passenger shall submit to any security checks by Government or airport officials or by Carrier.
Carriage to be performed by several successive Carriers under one Ticket, or under a Ticket and any conjunction Ticket issued in connection therewith, is regarded as a single operation for purposes of determining the application of the Convention to the transportation.
Unless the Carrier has issued the Ticket and performed no part of the carriage on the Ticket or on a Conjunction Ticket issued for successive Carriage, the Carrier shall not be liable for those parts of the journey performed by other carrier(s), except as provided for below.
In the event of the destruction, loss or delay of, or damage of Checked Baggage, Passengers or their beneficiaries may file a claim against the Carrier that performed the carriage during which the destruction loss, delay or damage occurred. Passengers may also file a claim against the first and last Carrier.
1. Carriage hereunder is subject to the rules and limitations relating to liability established by the Convention unless such carriage is not international carriage to which the Convention applies.
2. In carriage which is not international carriage to which the Convention applies:
(a) Carrier shall be liable for damage to a passenger or his checked baggage only if such damage has been caused by negligence of the Carrier. If there has been contributory negligence on the part of the passenger, Carrier's liability shall be subject to the applicable law relating to contributory negligence.
(b) except in the case of acts or omissions done with intent to cause damage or recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result:
(i) the liability of Carrier with respect to each passenger for death, wounding or other bodily injury shall be limited to the sum of 250,000 French Gold Francs or its equivalent (approximately US $20,000) provided that if in accordance with applicable law a different limit shall apply.
(ii) with respect to delay, Carrier shall be under no liability except as provided in these Conditions of Carriage.
3. To the extent not in conflict with the foregoing and whether or not the Convention applies:
(a) Carrier is liable only for damage on its own line. A carrier issuing a Ticket or checking baggage over the lines of another Carrier does so only as agents for such other Carrier. Nevertheless, with respect to checked baggage the passenger shall also have a right of action against the first or last Carrier.
(b) the liability of Carrier with respect to each passenger for death, wounding or other bodily injury shall be limited to the sum of 250,000 French Gold Francs or its equivalent (approximately US $20,000) provided that if in accordance with applicable law a different limit shall apply.
(c) Carrier is not liable for damage to unchecked baggage unless such damage is caused by the negligence on the part of the Carrier. If there has been contributory negligence on the part of the passenger, Carrier's liability shall be subject to the applicable law relating to contributory negligence.
(d) Carrier is not liable for any damage arising from its compliance with any laws or Government regulations, orders or requirements, or from failure of the passenger to comply with the same.
(e) except in the case of acts or omissions done with intent to cause damage or recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result, the liability of Carrier in case of damage to checked baggage shall be limited to 250 French Gold Francs or its equivalent (approximately US $20.00) per kilogram and in the case of damage to unchecked baggage it shall be limited to 5,000 French Gold Francs or its equivalent (approximately US $400.00) per passenger, provided that if in accordance with applicable law different limits of liability are applicable such different limits shall apply. If the weight of the baggage is not recorded on the baggage check, it is presumed that the total weight of the checked baggage does not exceed the applicable free baggage allowance for the class of service concerned, as provided in Carrier's Regulations. If in the case of checked baggage a higher value is declared pursuant to Article IX Paragraph 7, the liability of Carrier shall be limited to such higher declared value.
(f) Carrier's liability shall not exceed the amount of proven damages. Carrier shall furthermore not be liable for indirect or consequential damages.
(g) Carrier is not liable for injury to a passenger or for damage to a passenger's baggage caused by property contained in such passenger's baggage. Any passenger whose property causes injury to another person or damage to another person's property or to the property of Carrier shall indemnify Carrier for all losses and expenses incurred by Carrier as a result thereof.
(h) Carrier is not liable for damage to fragile or perishable items, money, delivery, precious metals, silverware, negotiable papers, securities, other valuables, business documents, passports and other identification documents or samples, which are included in the passenger's checked baggage.
(i) If a passenger is carried whose age or mental or physical condition is such as to any hazard or risk to himself or herself, Carrier shall not be liable for any illness, injury or disability, including death, attributable to such conditions or for the aggravation of such conditions.
(j) Any exclusion or limitation of liability of Carrier shall apply to and be for the benefit of agents, employees and representatives of Carrier and any person whose aircraft is used by Carrier and such person's agents, employees and representatives. The aggregate amount recoverable from Carrier and from such agents, employees, representatives and persons shall not exceed the amount of Carrier's limit of liability.
4. Unless so expressly provided nothing herein contained shall waive any exclusion or limitation of liability of Carrier under the Convention or applicable laws.
Special Agreement
Carrier shall avail itself of the limitations of liability provided in the Convention. However, in accordance with Article 22(1) of the Warsaw Convention, Caribbean Airlines Limited and certain other carriers agree that as to all international carriage by such carriers to which the Warsaw Convention applies and which according to the Contract of Carriage includes a point of origin, a point of destination or agreed stopping place in the U.S.:
(a) the limit of liability for each passenger for death, wounding, or other bodily injury shall be the sum of US $75,000 inclusive of legal fees and cost except that, in cases of a claim brought in a State where provision is made separate award of legal fees and costs, the limit shall be the sum of US $58,000 exclusive of legal fees and costs;
(b) such carrier shall not, with respect to any claim arising out of the death wounding or other bodily injury of a passenger, avail itself of any defense under Article 20(1) of the Convention.
Nothing herein shall be deemed to affect the rights and liabilities of such carriers with regard to any claim brought by, on behalf of, or in respect of, any person who has willfully caused damage that resulted in death, wounding, or other bodily injury of a passenger.
The names of carriers party to the agreement referred to in this Paragraph are available at all Ticket offices of such carriers and may be examined on request. Each of such carriers has entered into the said agreement solely on its own behalf and with respect to carriage performed by it and has not thereby imposed any liability on any other carrier with respect to the portion of carriage performed by such other carrier or assumed any liability with respect to the portion of the carriage performed by such other carrier.
Notice of Claim
1. No action shall lie in the case of damage to checked baggage unless the person entitled to delivery complains to Carrier forthwith after the discovery of the damage and, at the latest, within seven days from the date of receipt; and in the case of delay, unless the complaint is made at least within twenty-one (21) days from the date on which the baggage has been placed at his or her disposal. Every complaint must be made in writing and dispatched within the times aforesaid.
Limitation of Action
2. Any right to damages shall be extinguished if an action is not brought within two (2) years reckoned from the date of arrival at the destination, or from the date on which the aircraft ought to have arrived, or from the date on which the carriage stopped. The method of calculating the period limitation shall be determined by the law of the court seized of the case.
No agent, employee or representative of Carrier has the authority to alter, modify or waive any provision of these Conditions of Carriage.
Optional Fees
Customer Service Plan
Contingency Plan
About Us
Legal & Privacy Policy
Site Map
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
© Caribbean Airlines 2016 Designed and Developed by


text:
Prevention Services
The IVP Team provides prevention education and outreach events upon request to students, staff, and faculty. Topics include but are not limited to, healthy relationships, consent, empathy, sexual assault, bullying and harassment, nonviolence communication, and bystander intervention.
IVP Education
The education team creates and facilitates presentations to different groups on campus on a range of interpersonal violence topics, such as but not limited to: IVP basics, rape culture, healthy relationships and being an IVP UP-stander. The presentations are geared to create awareness as well as include prevention efforts. The IVP team can present any presentation on campus upon request. To see a list of the presentation that we offer on different topics of interpersonal violence, visit our IVP Education page.
IVP Outreach
The outreach team helps spread awareness about IVP issues and services to Binghamton University community through tabling, creating awareness events, developing outreach material, and managing the IVP twitter account. The outreach team works to create various materials such as: event flyers, brochures, and informative, interactive tangibles. The IVP team can provide outreach and tabling at events on campus upon request. To see some of our materials already created, visit our IVP Outreach page.
To request to have the IVP team facilitate a presentation or table at your event, click here!


text:
Wurtsboro Troopers arrest Wurtsboro woman for drug charges
January 24, 2012 —
On January 22, 2012, State Police in Wurtsboro responded to a 911 call regarding a possible drug overdose in the Village of Wurtsboro. While Troopers spoke with Julia Norton, a 50 year old resident of Wurtsboro, they observed cocaine in plain view on a cocktail table in the living room. Norton did not overdose and was arrested for Criminal Possession of Controlled Substance 5th and 7th degree and Possession of Marihuana. She was sent to Sullivan County Jail, no bail.


text:
Radar Golf Ball Finder
If your dad is serious at all about his golf game, he probably spends a fair amount of cash on golf balls. Losing two or three of those beauties per round can set him back $10 or more easily.
That makes RadarGolf's radar golf ball finder a must-have. The balls are comparable to top-of-the-line Titleist or other brands, but each one has a microchip inside that talks to a hand-held finder that will make sure Dad never again loses one in the rough or among the mulch under the trees.
It runs about $250, but over the course of a summer Dad can save that much from not having to replace his supply of golf balls every month. He might even take you golfing with him!
Measure Twice ... Or Just Once?


text: SO my second baby, a boy, has been diagnosed with a milk protein sensitivity, possibly soy protein sensitivity, and reflux. Ironically, my first daughter, now 2, had the same issues. The symptoms were fussiness, gassiness, crying when nursing, green, mucousy poop, and occult blood in the poop. Now that I'm seeing the same pattern in our little boy I'm wondering how much of it is really due to my ridiculous overabundance of milk. I already block feed on one side for 2 hours but I still have an insane letdown. My question is has anyone had their babies positive for occult (invisible) blood in the stool due to overactive letdown? Both my kids have had positive Hemoccult tests as babies meaning they have red blood cells in their poop. With my daughter I cut dairy out of my diet until she was 10 months and able to tolerate it. This is also when my milk production finally slowed a bit as she started eating more solids. My new pediatrician (we moved and I miss our old doc!) seems to just want me to go to formula because it's easier for him but I refuse. I've been off dairy now for 2 weeks and limiting soy but my baby is still extremely fussy and has the green gooey poop. I'm becoming suspicious that the bulk of my issues can be attributed to the excessive foremilk, as I never feel like baby boy gets much hindmilk. But yeah - let me know if anyone ever had bloody poop from this!


text:
Petite Floral/Leopard Blouse
Style: 570106554
Out of Stock
Sheer blouse thrives in our hand designed floral print with leopard trim and pintucked pleats. Goldtone cubes polish the tie-close neckline.
- Slightly shaped with darts at the bust.
- Scoopneck with leopard print border. Long sleeves tailored with pintucked pleats. Side slits.
- 100% polyester. Machine wash. Imported.
- Regular length: 28.5" from shoulder.
- Petite length: 27" from shoulder.
Read more… Read less…


text:
Hi, let's chat! Just tap the buttons below or simply type your message and I'll do my best to respond. 😊
When is your birthday?
What is your full name?
Where are you from?
Are you single?
Can I see your photographs?
What have you posted on Facebook recently?
What kind of music are you into?
What pages do you follow on Facebook?
Where are you from?
What is your ultimate dream?


text:
Who am I anyway?
Honestly, I practice humility as often as I can (www.kadampanewyork.org), and while I really enjoy hearing comments from you all, there are times when my ego (darn, I still have one) is slightly bruised. While strolling the grounds during the Tim McGraw concert (www.bethelwoodscenter.org) the other night, more than one country fan asked to have their picture taken. Happy to oblige, I was momentarily crestfallen when one young lady said "thank you, sir," while another said "aren't you Mr. Fox from The River Reporter?" Sir? Mister Fox? "Good Lord" I thought "When did I become Mister Fox? I thought he was my father!"
The show was fantastic, and up-and-comers Love and Theft and Brantley Gilbert were outstanding openers. I give McGraw a lot of credit, and he clearly is comfortable with his country superstar status, for lesser stars would hesitate to share the stage with these dynamos, who are (IMHO) destined for great careers. I had the opportunity to speak with Gilbert (www.brantleygilbert.com), whose on-stage persona is that of a tough guy, but I got the sense that he is a "mama's boy" at heart, which made him all the more appealing. Stephen Barker Liles and Eric Gunderson (www.loveandtheft.com) were sweet, both on-stage and off, and I was taken by how giving all of the performers were to their fans, signing autographs, posing for photos and providing a night of country music that was epic in proportions. Yee haw.
On Sunday, the 23rd annual RiverFest took place in Narrowsburg, NY, and despite some gloomy weather, folks turned out in droves for the highly anticipated poster auction, phenomenal entertainment and local art vendors, showcasing what RiverFest has become known for. The River Reporter was on hand, of course, and I spent the day snapping pics of the community posing for an opportunity to be on our "Front Page." To view, share and tag those photos, "like" us on Facebook and enjoy.


text:
Skip to comments.The Attempted Extortion of Paula Deen (This isn't a story about racism. It's about $1.25 Million)
Posted on 06/30/2013 10:06:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The real story behind the Paula Deen scandal can be summed up in a single word: greed. The American judicial system and the media are being used as formidable weapons in a brazen attempt to extort money from Ms. Deen, in my opinion.
This isn't a story about racism. It's all about the money.
The mainstream media have reported with glee only some of the gory details as Paula Deen's financial empire continue to crumble. The Food Channel, Wal-Mart, Target, and the publisher of her bestselling cookbook all have abruptly terminated their relationship with Ms. Deen. The firestorm erupted after it was widely reported that Ms. Deen gave a deposition in a civil lawsuit in which she admitted using the N-word.
Rarely if ever mentioned by the national press is the context in which the word was used, or the reason the deposition became public knowledge.
No one is interested in defending the use of that particular word, including this writer.
But for the record, the specific instance in which Ms. Deen admitted to using that specific word was in the privacy of her own home, used to describe a robber who had pointed a gun at her head. The mainstream media also doesn't seem to care that Ms. Deen could easily have lied about that specific incident, yet chose to tell the truth under oath.
Apparently there's a zero tolerance policy when certain people use the forbidden N-word.
Never mind that the epithet was uttered in privacy, after Ms. Deen had suffered considerable duress of being robbed at gunpoint.
That the usage became public knowledge only when Jackson's attorney began conducting a smear campaign intended to inflict irreparable harm on Ms. Deen's businesses also seems to be irrelevant information to the drive-by media.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Plaintiff Lisa T. Jackson wanted $1.25 million dollars that didn't belong to her, so she decided to sue Paula Deen and her brother.
Consider the evidence:
1) In her deposition, Ms. Jackson was forced to admit that she never heard Paula Deen utter a racial epithet, never knew her to discriminate against an employee based on gender, and never knew Paula Deen to sexually harass anyone.
2) Both plaintiff and defendant are white, making racial discrimination against Jackson an impossible charge to prove.
3) It has not been widely reported outside the local press that Jackson sent Deen and her brother a letter praising and thanking them both, only a few short months before filing suit. In an effusive letter she wrote:
"When I came to work for this company, as a person, I felt hopeless. I needed something, some opportunity that could provide me hope as an individual, as a woman, to make it on my own. At 15, homeless, without parents and with a young child, my life was headed in a direction no one could ever assume positive. As you know, I did what I had to do to survive, but it clearly was not the freedom or happiness I ever hoped for... When I started working for Bubba, he gave me an opportunity that allowed me, over time, a freedom I have never experienced. He allowed me, for once in my life to take care of myself and for once, have faith in myself as a person and as a woman to know that I could do it on my own; y'all were my Aunt Peggy... I have been given opportunities that I never thought possible, all because of you and Bubba."
The person who wrote that letter now wants $1.25 million dollars? For what?
First they came for Martha Stewart, then they came for Paula Deen, next they came for...
Yeah, well if they come for me, I'll just make 'em a nice peach cobbler.
You can be sure of one thing, they will never come for Alec Baldwin!
That was my contention when I first read about the situation — using the N-word or sexual harassment — whichever will get the plaintiff some money.
I didn't even realize at the time that the use of the N-word happened decades previous.
Perhaps, the plaintiff read Jesse Jackson's Shakedown.
She should have gone with an immediate counterattack equating her critics with armed robbers, and putting out a call for a counter-boycott.
Being meek doesn't work.
Well, I have to add that that's only a viable strategy if there aren't other embarrassing facts that are not yet public knowledge.
I figured it was extortion done the legal way...via your lawyer. And the woman who is suing Paula Deen her brother and their restaurant is white. She is also claiming harm from the alleged racism even though she is white
Paula should stand tall.
Just stop crying and begging for forgiveness from race pimps and leftist scammers and tell them to all to go pound sand up their .... noses.
She has her millions salted away.
Why degrade herself seeking approval of moochers and racists?
Had Paula Deen been black or very brown, and not a "creepy ass cracker," none of this would have happened to her. Let that be a lesson to one and all.
" The TV star told the Washington Examiner that she and Michelle had more in common than you might expect.
- She said: 'I did a show with Michelle and I just loved being with her.
- 'She probably ate more than any other guest I've ever had on the show.
- 'She kept eating even during commercials.'
- After complimenting Michelle on her slim figure, Paula taught her how to fry shrimp during a TV segment in September 2008, shortly before the presidential election.
This is the real reason Paula has been fired..
Great post - info I didn't know
RE: Why degrade herself seeking approval of moochers and racists?
Apparently $10 Million in the bank is not enough... she's crying because she's going to lose more millions from the company endorsements she could have made... the same ones who are deserting her now.
All those retailers that "fired" Paula Dean still carry the Rap recordings which contain the same word.
You can be sure of one thing, they will never come for Alec Baldwin!
Or Bill Maher
People have got to stop apologizing and grovelling to these racist fear mongers. If you feel the need to apologize make one statement and then shut up and let it all blow over. They never learn. You would think Paula Deen had committed double murder.
Freedom of speech, if one person can say a word without there being a problem then all people can say that word. The media is piling on Deen because she isn't like them.
For me, the most disturbing thing about Paula Deen's recent troubles was the tacit and sometimes gleeful approval of her treatment right here on this forum because of her supposed political leanings.
It is also the food police Nazi's
What the destruction of Paula Deen is really about is creating a distraction for Obamas scandals. The liberals are willing to eat their own in order to protect their dear leader.
she is narcissistic for thinking she could admit to using the word and getting away with it and she is an obummer voter, so the heck with her. the funny thing is I wonder what percentage of her sales are actually to blacks. instead of worrying that they're living like animals, dying in record numbers, have no education and are going nowhere, they worry about this. incredible.
I admit I laugh when an Obot gets destroyed by the people they promote...probably because I understand that we likely will be shooting at each other soon enough! When the largest political party in the country illegally certifies someone as president and then all of these people fawn over him...the end is nigh!
Deen even recently told the Washington Examiner, [Michelle Obama] probably ate more than any other guest I ever had on the show! She kept eating even during commercials. Know what [the Obamas] favorite foods are? Hot wings."
She paints a picture of Obama that's a far cry from the first lady who was photographed holding a worm she pulled from a vegetable garden yesterday.
According to the Enquirer, Obama now regrets going on Deen's show. Michelles spitting mad, a source told the paper. She thinks Paula is trying to smear her and her family just as the 2012 presidential election race swings into gear.
Yep. At this point people of a certain hue can realistically expect to lose their livelihoods if they even recite a list of Richard Pryor albums, or Joseph Conrad novels, within earshot of anyone. We have gone insane.
Looks like the word nigger has became a extortion tool so now 99.95 of the people in this country can be expected to pay up?.
Well, she already degraded herself for the approval of racists and moochers — the Obamas.
thank you very interesting
Who, among us, has never uttered the word "Nigger"?
The same publisher, Ballantine Books, owned by Random House, just happens to be the same publisher of another QVC Channel author, David Venable, that's right, the foodie guy himself!
I admire Paula's cooking skills while blind.
$1.25M would have been a cheap way to purchase a settlement and a confidentiality agreement and to forego all this nonsense.
She wanted to do what was right...she is white and from the South...she made it the hard way she earned not like a lot of people in this country...She should have told what happened and why and not done the apology tour... that only works for democrats
Robert Byrd, former KKK leader and "conscience of the Senate", called someone a "white nigger", which implies that the default description of a nigger is someone who is not white. Not one person on the left made one little squeek about it. He was Southern, and a former KKK leader. And he used this term long after his supposed epiphany.
Apparently he was too important to advancing the left's agenda to be made to apologise or bear any responsibility for his actions. His words weren't in the distant past under duress, like being robbed at gunpoint. His were in the prime of his career. And like I said, using the description "white nigger" implies by default that just a regular "nigger" isn't white, so it must be someone of color.
Apparently Paula didn't donate enough to the left's causes to get a pass. Byrd also never denounced his own southerness, though he did play himself up as one of those "reconstructed" kinds (scallywag).
Paula Deen IS a democrat. She supported the Usurper.
Sorry, which post are you quoting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.


text: Bill Naumann, professor of religious studies emeritus, was one of several speakers who presented sessions for the reunion of Evangelical Theological Seminary alumni held March 23-25 on campus. His address titled "Evangelical United Brethren Theological Affirmations" included a look back at the history and evolution of the denomination's theology. As part its 150th anniversary, North Central hosted the reunion with the theme "Living the Theology We Affirm." Among the highlights was a community Lenten worship service in Wentz Concert Hall, which included the participation of choirs and bell choirs from four Naperville United Methodist churches and preaching by Bishop Sharon Zimmerman '61 Rader.


text:
Home List of Titles HST imaging of the globular clusters in the Fornax Cluster: NGC 1399 and NGC 1404
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/43950
|Download PDF (Author's final draft) (Adobe Acrobat PDF, -1 bytes)
- Title
- HST imaging of the globular clusters in the Fornax Cluster: NGC 1399 and NGC 1404
- Author(s)
- Forbes, Duncan A.; Grillmair, Carl J.; Williger, Gerard M.; Elson, Rebecca A. W.; Brodie, Jean P.
- Abstract
- The Fornax cluster galaxies NGC 1399 and NGC 1404 are ideal for studying the effects of a cluster environment on globular cluster systems. Here we present new optical imaging of these two galaxies from both the Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 and the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory 1.5-m telescope. The combination of both data sets provides a unique insight on the spatial and colour distribution of globular clusters. From B−I colours, we find that both galaxies have a broad globular cluster metallicity distribution that is inconsistent with a single population. Two Gaussians provide a reasonable representation of the metallicity distribution in each galaxy. The metal-rich subpopulation is more centrally concentrated than the metal-poor one. We show that the radial metallicity gradient can be explained by the changing relative mix of the two globular cluster subpopulations. We derive globular cluster surface density profiles, and find that they are flatter (i.e., more extended) than the underlying starlight. The total number of globular clusters and specific frequency are calculated to be N=5700±500, SN=11.5±1.0 for NGC 1399, and N=725±145, SN=2.0±0.5 for NGC 1404. Our results are compared with the expectations of globular cluster formation scenarios.
- Publication type
- Journal article
- Source
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 293, no. 3 (Jan 1998), pp. 325-336
- Publication year
- 1998
- Keyword(s)
- cD; Clusters; Elliptical galaxies; Fornax Cluster; Galaxies; HST; Hubble Space Telescope; Interactions; Lenticular galaxies; NGC 1399; NGC 1404; Star clusters; WFPC2; Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing
- 0035-8711
- Publisher URL
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1998 Royal Astronomical Society. Author's final draft reproduced here on 8 January 2009 in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
- Full text
- Peer reviewed


text:
Hi Everyone,
I'm new to the forum and this is the first time I'm posting. I can't express how greatful I am to have this medium where we can support and understand each other. This is why I wanted to ask your opinions on my situation.
I'll be returning to work in 2 weeks and my son will be almost 4 months old. I have the opportunity to work 30 hrs a week and remain FT. I'd be working 2, 8hr days, a 9 hr day and a 5 hr day. This would allow me to keep FT benefits, which are less expensive and extra saving money.
My other option is to work PT 2 8hr days, a 5 hr day and attend a 1 hr weekly meeting. This would allow me to spend more time with my son and would be easier with breastfeeding, but would cost more since benefits would be more expensive and we'd have less income.
my dilemma is that i'm not sure what to do. I can afford to work PT and i love the idea of spending more time with my son. On the other hand I like the idea of saving for our families future and it's just one more day. I know that money can never replace time, but money can also make things easier.
I also don't know if i'm worrying so much because i'm having a hard time dealing with going back to work and I think i've been very fortunate to have been able to stay on leave for so long, but i just have no idea what to do!
Id really love to know what you all think, since i'm sure a lot of you have been in the same situation.
Much Love!


text:
The Stetson volleyball team captured the 2013 Stetson Westin Classic title with a 3-1 victory over Providence and a 3-0 triumph over Savannah State Saturday afternoon at the Edmunds Center.
The Hatters (5-3) went a perfect 4-0 in the two-day tournament and have posted their first four-game winning streak since 2007.
"It feels unbelievably amazing," senior Ellen Hawks said after the final match. "This is the first tournament win I have had since being at Stetson. It took each and every girl doing their part and working hard, and I am just so proud of all these girls."
Kaley Melville and Kayla Weller were named co-Most Valuable Players for the tournament, while Madison and Akins and Hawks joined Melville and Weller on the all-tournament team.
"I was really happy for the girls," Stetson head coach Tim Loesch said. "They worked really hard this preseason, and it was nice to see it all come together for them. We got contributions from everybody that was cleared to play. We are all about the team and playing together as one, and the girls did that this weekend."
The tournament championship was decided in Stetson's first match of the day against Providence. The teams split the first two sets and Stetson held a 12-10 lead in the third when Hawks recorded four consecutive blocks, one with Melville and three with Akins. That was part of a 6-0 run that helped Stetson take the third set 25-19.
"We just wanted to be aggressive," Hawks said about that stretch. "I just came onto the court and said, 'Let's go, let's get some blocks!' We just wanted to get up and make it easy for our defenders."
Stetson went on to an easy 25-14 win in the fourth set.
"Playing Providence was fun, it was an exciting match, and they are a good team," Loesch said. "I was just proud of the girls after we lost a set that they kept battling and finding a way to be successful. Then we continued to improve and we were able to close it out in fine fashion in the fourth set."
Akins led the way with 14 kills while Erika White added 12 and Tiffany Creamer chipped in 11. Weller collected 48 assists and 16 digs.
Stetson hit a blistering .379 against Savannah State, posting 41 kills in 87 attempts with just eight errors. Hawks (8-0-12, .667), Melville (9-0-17, .529), Creamer (6-1-11, .455), and Prewitt (9-1-20, .400) all had high attack percentages. Freshman Danika Yoder picked up a season-best 18 assists.
"That is a key for us and something we have been working on in practice," Loesch said about the Hatters' low-error total. "It was good to see them do that in real games against live competition. It is something we are going to have to work on throughout the season but I am glad the girls are buying into that. They are really having fun with our offense and with our defense."
Stetson will return to action next weekend at the Lion Classic in Hammond, La.
Notes: The Hatters have surpassed last year's win total ... The Hatters are off to their best start since 1999 ... Ellen Hawks surpassed 300 career blocks, becoming the seventh Hatter all-time to reach that milestone ... The full all-tournament team included Rhea Simon and Phylecia Armstrong from B-CU, Bryana Gadis and Bianca Brochu from SSU, Mackenzie Ziegler and Michelle Cruz from Providence, and Madison Akins, Ellen Hawks, Kaley Melville (co-MVP) and Kayla Weller (co-MVP) from Stetson.