text:
Click the button below or email firstname.lastname@example.com to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Tennis Warehouse.
Please include any relevant information such as skill level and style of play.
Comments: Honestly, these shoes are amazing. I do not know what any of these people are talking about, the
break-in period is not that bad. It is a great shoe and comfortable out of the box and even more comfortable after you play in
them. Thanks nike for an amazing shoe.
From: Eric, 2/12
Comments: These shoes are amazing once you get past the break-in period, which took almost 2 weeks. It was the
worst break-in period of any shoe I have ever tried (and Barricade 5.0s were bad for me). Once I got past the break-in period I
have found that they are the most durable, stable, and well cushioned shoes I have worn. The downside is that they are a little
heavy and clunky, but you get used to it. Will buy the CB 4.3s soon.
From: Anon. 1/12
Comments: It's taken a little bit of adjustment, but I've finally figured out how to enjoy this shoe, which in my
normal size 9 was always too tight on the sides for
me and had the tendency to smash my toenails when chasing down drop shots
(didn't happen in the same size CB 2.3s). So I went up to a size 9.5, which was so much more comfortable, it was a tad roomy in
the toebox, but the shoe conformed to my foot in no time, and I felt planted in the shoe (no more smashed toenails as a plus!).
However, I think the shoe was meant for someone with bigger feet because the inner sides of the upper began to dig into my
ankle as the insoles started to become more compacted, so my solution was to swap in my trusty polysorb insoles (which have a
beefy heel+cheap+work for hi/med arch feet). This is a heavy combo...but my feet and joints feel great, so I'm OK not chasing
down every shot :P I switched to the CB line for the stability and Max Air in the heel to keep me protected, and it has performed as
From: Anon. 1/12
Comments: This is a great shoe if you don't have wide feet! If only it wasn't so tight around the forefoot I would
love this shoe very much. I tried switching to a thinner aftermarket insole but still to tight and hurting my feet. Then I figure I just
needed to break them in but after a month of playing they still feel tight. That's too bad because I love everything else about the
From: Joe, 1/12
Comments: I need to first mention that I have loyally been wearing Nike shoes (Breathe Free and Cage) for probably
the past 6 or 8 years. When the Cage 2,s finally ran out of stock at Tennis Warehouse I had to switch to Nike's only shoe line with
warranty. This was the Court Ballistec 3.3. I can honestly say that these are the most uncomfortable tennis shoes I have ever worn.
My feet are literally in pain within 20-30 minutes of play. I think I have figured out the cause of much of the pain and it is due to
how the laces cinch up the shoe when tied tightly. If you look close up at the pictures of the shoe you can see that the lace holes
are little yellow loops. Well these loops continue down all the way to the sole of the shoe and effectively form 4 narrow straps that
put tremendous pressure on your feet. These 4 straps are the only thing that get tighter when you tighten the laces. These straps
are independent of the upper of the shoe. The upper of the shoe just sort of floats above these straps. In a normal shoe, the
eyelets for lacing are connected right to the upper of the shoe so that when you tie them up all the pressure from tightening is
evenly distributed along the entire upper and subsequently your foot. I am not sure if any of this has been mentioned by other
posters but this is my reasoning behind my discomfort.
From: John, 12/11
Comments: This shoe looks great but is too heavy for me. I didn't think it would be such an issue but I wish I would
have gotten a lighter shoe. Not to bad for comfortable wise but I don't think it is worth it.
From: Nate, 12/11
Comments: The shoe has a really cheap lacing system that breaks easily if
you routinely tighten your shoes before your play.
From: Chuck, 12/11
Comments:First off, I have been wearing adidas Barricade's since the IV edition, decided to try the 3.3 Court
Ballistecs. Since everyone was commenting on the 'tightness' of the forefoot area, I decided to go up a full size. Truth be told, this
fit my feet really well after 30 mins of walking around and then I gave it a test drive on the tennis courts. I really like the shoe, it is
comfortable, light, and stable. I can't comment on durability though. I want to add wearing this with jeans also is a hit. Thanks
Tennis Warehouse!
From: Praetorian, 12/11
Comments: I want to love then, really. I love the colors, but they just hurt way too much. While I have a wide foot,
I've not had problems with the Breathe or Lunars. Kept waiting for them to beak in, but they haven't. Sadly, you really need a
narrow foot for the shoes to work.
From: Paul, 12/11
Comments: For me the Nike Court Ballistic 3.3 are the best tennis shoes in the market. It's got a great design and
extremely comfortable. I'd been
having knee problems for the past year with the adidas Barricade range.
The cushioning on the 3.3s is great! I haven't had a problem at all
since and I've had Court Ballistics for the past 2 years. The only thing
is getting use to the shoe, at the beginning the shoe hurt the soles of
my feet because the width of the shoe was slightly tight on me but it
soon molded to my foot and the other thing is the weight of the shoe
which is heavier than the regular tennis shoe because of all the
cushioning and the Air Max technology. But for me without a doubt this is
the best tennis shoe in the market!
From: Albert, 12/11
Comments: For those of you who are having trouble adjusting to this shoe, and loved the 2.3's more, I have the
perfect solution. The 3.3's make you feel higher off the ground, whereas the 2.3's make you feel like you're more grounded. To
fix this, simply switch the insoles of the shoes. When you do you'll notice that the 3.3's insoles are much thicker than the ones
placed in the 2.3's. And once you slip the 2.3's in the 3.3's, you'll feel like the shoe is lighter, and more grounded. I hope this
From: Isriz, 12/11
Comments: I've been playing with Nike shoes for the last 9 years - my favorite being
the Breath 2, the old Federer shoe. The new 3.3 is the best shoe I have found since the Breath 2. I see most people don't like them.
I have fairly narrow feet, so that's why they are probably good for me. They are stiff and tricky to get on the first couple times, but
after walking around in them once or twice they felt fantastic on court! Great comfort, extremely solid, didn't feel heavy at all - the
best comment I could say is, I didn't have to think about my shoes for a second while playing, they did exactly what I wanted to do
with great comfort and speed. I've only played with them a few times, but I don't know how they could somehow stop being good.
If you have narrowish feet, give these a try!
From: Terry, 12/11
Comments: Stiff, tight fitting shoe that's not as durable as it makes out to be. The grip of the shoe wears out and if
not that the lacing system breaks and the shoe is stuffed anyway. I was a big Nike fan but their shoes have just gone to water,
Nike never again.
From: Sam, 11/11
Comments: Great looking shoe, but after 2 weeks of play they are just too tight in the fore-foot. It has been a
painful 2 weeks. Today I skipped the first two eyelets lacing up the shoes. It looks a little funny, but I am now pain free. Give this a
try, your wide feet will thank me.
From: Mike, 11/11
Comments: I bought these shoes and used them about 3 months. It is very heavy shoes, but good cushioning and
comfort. The biggest problem is the holders of laces. After 2 months of using the shoe, they were broken.
From: Anon, 11/11
Comments: This shoe looks great and it started out sort of tight. I think it will be pretty durable and help your
footwork/speed with the Drag technology. Yay!
From: Andrew, 11/11
Comments: Owned a pair of these for a while now and wanted to love them. Unfortunately these took about two
weeks of constant play to break in and they still don't feel comfortable. Now months into owning this shoe, my right arch hurts
like I've never felt after playing. I've developed some back issues over the last 2 months and am staring to wonder now if there is
any connection. Used to wear Lunar 8's with no problem. Not the most durable shoe, but certainly lighter and more comfortable
than this shoe. On a positive note, durability is a plus. Comfort is at the other end of the spectrum for me however. Conclusion:
Going back to the Lunars until they come out with something that provides equal comfort to durability.
From: Anon, 11/11
Comments: These shoes, I agree, are one of the most durable shoes you'll play with. With the extra durability
comes the extra weight coming at 17.48 oz, which is over a pound on your foot when you're running on the court. They feel like
blocks on your feet, a bit narrow in the toe box, and they also have a weird arch, but I broke that in and the rest of the shoe after
a little bit of time. Overall, a great shoe for people with strong legs or those that wear out shoes in a short period of time.
From: Josh, 11/11
Comments: Best shoe I've ever worn in terms of performance. Hands down. I play 9.0 mixed doubles, and never
slipped while split stepping or changing direction. Also, the stability in these shoes is incredible. My ankle felt stable whenever I
was sliding on court. That's where the positives end for this shoe. After using these shoes for a while, I started having pain in my
arches. They are very narrow shoes. The 2.3s fit perfectly in terms of width, but the 3.3s were much too tight. Even as a soccer
player who likes very tight shoes, these were unbearable. If you have a narrow foot, I highly recommend this shoe. I wish I did, so I
could continue to use these. They lasted me 5 months of infrequent match play. My ratings: Performance (running, stopping, etc):
4.7, Stability/Ankle Support: 4.8, Arch Support: 3.4, Traction: 4.7, Comfort: 3.0, Durability: 4.0, Weight: 4.0, and Overall: 4.0.
From: Anon, 11/11
Comments: These shoes are great! They give me a lot of support and comfort. The shoes did need a lot of break in
though it took me about 3-4 outings to break-in to them as my feet are very wide. But after breaking in to them they felt terrific, I
would highly recommend these shoes to anyone even people with wide feet because all you have to do is break in to them.
From: Ray, 10/11
Comments: Everybody says these shoes don't fit well and hurt, but I have a thin foot and they fit me perfectly and
are extremely stable. I never even think about turning an ankle. For me, they also work very well for changing direction. I like
these way better then Nike Vapor's, adidas Barricade's, or the Nike Court Ballistec 1.3's and 2.3's.
From: Fritz, 10/11
Comments: I bought my son the Nike Air Max Court Ballistic 3.3 shoes. It took a week or two to break in. He really
likes these shoes. My son used to wear the Nike Lunar Vapor 8 Tour for speed but he was going through them pretty quickly. He
was also getting on and off knee pains. Since he switched to the Nike Air Max Court Ballistic 3.3, he hasn't had any knee pain. I
just bought another pair of Nike Air Max Court Ballistic 3.3 so he alternate his shoes.
From: Susana, 10/11
Comments: I have been wearing these shoes regularly (not on the court) just to stretch them out and they still felt
kind of tight on court. After switching to thinner socks the shoes felt much much better. If you don't enjoy painful breaking in
periods then I would suggest a different shoe. I hope that helps with most everyone's "tight" issue.
From: Chris, 10/11
Comments: I found the part near the ankle has a plastic part which is bad designed. It caused pain on my ankle. I
thought the Nike Court Ballistec 2.3 is way more comfortable.
From: Jackson, 10/11
Comments: This shoe is great. I play everyday on hot Texan hard courts about 4 hours a day (4.0-4.5) and they
lasted me 5 months. I played extensively to get me free shoes but these shoes are extremely comfortable and the arch hits me
perfectly. They did require a bit of break in at first but now they are the most comfortable shoe I have worn. They look great too. I
am a big dragger and the DragOn 2x really helped me out as these were the only shoes that haven't burned a hole. This is the best
From: Salvador, 10/11
Comments: Huge fan of the 2.3s but these just don't fit the same. Surprisingly how much a
shoe can change from one generation to the next. I'm 23 a solid 4.5 player with an all
around game and play about 4-5x a week. My feet are relatively wide and I've been wearing
Nikes for who knows how long and for all other sports. The 3.3 in a size 10(my normal
size) feels abnormally long and really tight around the mid foot; while the 2.3 had a true to
length fit and normal width. The first time playing in these I had to stop midway and take
them off b/c my feet were cramping due to the tightness. Took me about 2 weeks to break
them in and even then it still runs long and my feet moves from time to time. I tried on a
pair of 9.5 and they were way too small. The sizing for this shoe is just off. As you can
probably tell, I'm not too happy with the shoe. Pretty durable I must say, but it's just not
worth it if I can't run and stop at full speed w/o potentially hurt myself.
durability: 8/10
From: WR, 10/11
Comments: I have these shoes and I find them very durable and very effective for quick movements people often
mistake them for the the Kobe's (basketball shoe).
From: John, 10/11
Comments: Contrary to many other reviews, I felt these shoes needed no break in. As soon as I slipped them on
they felt great. After an hour and a half of playing, my feet still were fine with no pains.
From: Ryan, 10/11
Comments: Great feeling shoes but the shoelace eyelets break after about 2 months. They just rot out and break. I
have two pairs that are useless now even though the soles are fine. Poor design on the lace system! The older versions did not
have this problem.
From: Randy, 10/11
Comments:The shoes I wanted were discontinued (New Balance MC900). Against my better judgement, I tried these
Nike's and I was surprised to find a great pair of shoes. Good looking, high performance, and comfortable. No break-in required.
After a month of play almost daily (4.0+), I am quite happy to recommend them for their high level of performance. No regrets
here. Everyone seems to comment on what great looking shoes they are. I am a size 10, narrow/medium width feet, pronator,
high arch with plantar fasciitis sensitivity.
From: David, 10/11
Comments: It's a fantastic shoe. Everything is great about it except the break-in and the toe durability. Nike should
bulk up the toe area more for the toe draggers. Its a awesome shoe at an awesome deal. The 6 month warranty is a good deal too.
From: Brian, 9/11
Comments: I have been playing in the 3.3's for about a month now. They are finally breaking in. Playing a couple of
times a week I was hoping to break them in faster. One of my only complaints is that the shoe is too narrow for my foot causing
pain and slight blistering. The rubber on the front of the toe is also wearing pretty fast. They do offer great traction and stability
From: Brandon, 9/11
Comments: These are the worst shoes I've ever gotten. The reinforced upper is so extremely stiff that they dig in to
my ankles, causing severe bruises.
From: Joe, 9/11
Comments: These are very, very good shoes! They are really comfortable from the inside. Personally, I didn't need a
break-in period and I am enjoying the
performance and style of the 3.3
From: Lien, 9/11
Comments: Great looking shoe but poorly designed lace system! I have two pairs of 3.3's that are useless after a
few months. The cloth shoelace eyelets are a weak link in this shoe and break very easily! They basically rot out and snap. I have 3
pairs of 2.3's and wore them into the ground with no complaints.
From: Randy, 9/11
Comments: I have had my Nike Air Court Ballistec 3.3's for a few days and I really like them. They are the best
shoes I've had. I especially like the feel and how light they are on the court.
From: Sam, 8/11
Comments: I've had the Court Ballistec 3.3's for 3 days now and they are one of the most comfortable and stylish
tennis shoes I've bought to date. Reading all the negative reviews made me a bit nervous but I had nothing to worry about. Maybe
I have the right foot ergonomics for these shoes but they fit me just right. Even though I've only hit the courts with them just once
I've used them to run some errands and they had a relatively fast break-in. These for me work just fine. True to size as well. The
only knock I can find is that they are a bit on the heavy side but that's nothing I can't get used to. I come from using the Babolat
Team All Court Reverse and the 3.3's are in a totally different league. I would definitely buy again.
From: Cris, 8/11
Comments: I'm on my third pair of 3.3's. I am 6'3 and 190 pounds. I've tried a number of other brands and other
Nike sneakers as well. Being tall and at 190 pounds puts a lot of jarring on my knees especially playing on hard courts most of the
time but with the 3.3's my knee problems are very minimal. They absorb impact very well, which is my favorite part about these
sneakers. It didn't take long to break in for me and for my money, the 6 month durability guarantee is awesome. When it comes
time to sending them in, Nike responds very quickly with a retail voucher for you to buy another pair if you were to wear them out
prior to 6 months.
From: Rick, 8/11
Comments: Nike has finally managed to get all the stability a tennis player could ever hope for and all in the wrong
spots! The forefoot is completely locked into the shoe; so locked in that a nice numb and tingling sensation can be felt from the
moment you sink your feet into these. In addition to that comfortably constricting feeling, this shoe quickly begins to heat the
foot up. Along with this perfectly constructed plastic wrapping is the newest in Nike technology, the slide-heel. Yes you're locked
into the front of the shoe, but the heel is most definitely not. Additionally, the cushioning of this sleek shoe is spot on if
compared to running on pavement with bare feet. You won't even feel it being there! The rubber sole wears down at an
astonishing rate. So if you like spending money at an alarming rate, it's your lucky day, because you'll get to dish out more dough
in no time!
From: Ryan. 8/11
Comments: Before this 3.3 I was using the Nike Zoom Breathe 2k10 and they were great. Then I bought this shoes.
At first they were hurting me but the break-in period was over (very long time), they were GREAT, just perfect. Very light, just
From: Nacho. 8/11
Comments: These shoes had the longest break-in period. If you can get past the break-in, you will enjoy playing in
them, but it may take a while. I recommend these shoes if you have narrow feet. I have wide feet and they were pinching in all
the wrong places early on, but I now like them just as I liked the 2.3's. They are extremely durable and will probably outlast the 6
month durability guarantee unless you take a belt sander to the outsole.
From: John, 8/11
Comments: The reviews are right. It takes forever for this shoe to break in and the break-in period is not
comfortable. I love how they snug they fit though, almost similar to the fit of the Nike Breathe Cage II. The durability is horrible
though. I mostly teach in them and they've already worn through the toe area of my left shoe. I've only had these for a month and
I'm almost ready to send them back. The durability of the Cages and the 2.3's is definitely better than the 3.3.
From: Patrick, 8/11
Comments: These are great shoes. It didn't take that long for the shoes to break in. For me, it took 2 hours of
playing. For the first one and a half hours, the shoes were very painful. But after that, they were very comfortable to play in. The
shoe is very breathable and the Air Max unit in the heel was great. This shoe is a bit narrow so I ordered a half size bigger. At first
it's a bit of an awkward fit, but it will loosen up eventually. The shoe design is really cool. I don't know why people were
disappointed by this shoe, to me they're pretty much the same as the 2.3 shoe.
From: Carlos, 8/11
Comments: A good way to break into this shoe is to put it in the drying machine, and as soon as the drying process
is over, take them out put them on, they will feel super
flexible, walk around with them for a bit while they are still warm; they will be practically broken in. I had these shoes and thought
they were great. When I first had the shoe I felt discomfort in the outside part of my shoe, as I broke them in I stopped feeling the
discomfort. This is not the most durable shoe, in 2 weeks time the soles were gone. Best thing is that laces don't break when I
slide (I slide A LOT) because they are protected by the thick sides.
From: Berny. 08/11
Comments: I have bought two pairs of these and I have to say that I was a little concerned after all of the bad reviews this shoe was getting. I also have two pairs of the 2.3's and I recently got the new Nike Zoom Breathe 2k11's so I have a pretty good feel of the pros/cons of each shoe.
I really have enjoyed my 3.3's and they are a little stiff at first so I just wore the around the house for about 2 days before I played in them, and I really had an easy time wearing them on court--no blisters and my feet felt fine after play. I can't say that I can give a good or bad review for durability yet since I have not had them long enough but these feel a lot more durable than the 2.3's. I loved my 2.3's and still wear them when practicing. The 2.3's slipped on easier and were a tad bit more comfy but I feel that the 3.3's are just a better/more durable shoe. Now I did go down half a size for the 3.3's. I wear a 9.5 in the 2.3's and a 9 in the 3.3's.
So if you were like me and afraid of trying the 3.3's because of all of
the negative feedback, I can say that I gave them a shot and love
From: Scott, 8/11
Comments: Shoes broke in after around 20 - 24 hours of court use, which is around 4 weeks for me. I experienced
discomfort due to the shoes being so narrow as majority of the people have already commented. Since the time shoes broke in, I
haven't experienced too much discomfort. I wouldn't have minded enduring the 4 weeks of pain if the shoes were more durable
than other shoes I've owned in the past. However, I'm not happy with the durability nor the traction provided by the shoes, even
when the shoes were new. I've had the shoes for 2 months now and I've already worn out the grooves in my toe area and outer
heal of my right shoe. I've lost a few points during matches because I lost footing while changing directions hard. I never had
traction problems with the Barricade 5's I've owned prior with the same amount of mileage. Most likely, I will have burned through
the sole by the 3rd month. The good news is that the shoes are covered under the 6 month warranty from Nike. The bad news is
I will have to break in the new shoes again when the time comes. On a positive note, I have received compliments from several
people (non tennis players) on how the shoes looked while I was wearing them (white/blue).
From: Tae, 8/11
Comments: I think I had similar problems to a few other here. These shoes have fantastic performance but hurt my
feet terribly. They also do not break in and if anything, I think feel stiffer and tighter after a few weeks.
From: Dave, 8/11
Comments: An amazing tennis shoe, best I've ever worn. It has good durability, stability and breathability. It looks
nice too, modern but not too flash. Break-in took about 4 hours and caused a few blisters and pain to my outer mid sole (plastic
shank there I think) until it was complete. Now they fit like a glove even though I have fairly wide feet. Normally an 11.5, I
was an 11 in these. For anyone complaining about their heel slipping, that's simply because they aren't broken in. Bend and twist
them back on themselves with your hands before the first time you wear them- the slipping is simply due to the sole being very
stiff out the box
and not a poor fit. This bending combined with 4 hours break will give you the perfect shoe. I have a spare pair sitting in a box in
my closet. A tremendous shoe, much improved over the 1.3 and better than the newer 3.3s too in my opinion.
From: Nick, 8/11
Comments: At first these shoes are extremely uncomfortable and they hurt my feet horribly a lot! It hurt almost
every part of my feet, but that was only the first day, every day it would feel better and by the week I can say these are the most
awesome shoes and best traction in the court! They look amazing! I got the blue ones and they look way better when you put
them on!
From: Memo. 08/11
Comments: These are the best tennis shoes I've ever worn! They fit me like a glove and give me excellent arch
support. Very sturdy, easy to move in, I didn't find them stiff. They're almost like running shoes that have been turned into tennis
shoes. I have a narrow foot, a high arch, and over pronate when I run. I wear a 11.5 medium D Nike running shoe and an 11.5
Nike Air Court Ballistic 3.3. I don't think these shoes are for men with wider feet or who over pronate.
From: GV, 7/11
Comments: I found these shoes to have great comfort, support and stability! These were given to me by a friend
and they are a nice surprise.
From: Anon, 7/11
Comments: This shoe is a little stiff at first, but after it breaks in it is so comforting on your feet. It is definitely
worth the wait. These shoes do slide when used a lot, but overall a great shoe by Nike.
From: Davis, 7/11
Comments: I've had these shoes for about three months and after about month 2, I stopped wearing them. These
shoes are very narrow and if you tie your shoes tightly like you should while playing tennis, your feet will hurt very much. I have
several pairs of Nikes and none of my other
Nikes hurt at all. The shoes don't really break in that much because it's mostly made of PLASTIC.
From: Changseok. 7/11
Comments: The first day I wore these, all I could think of was buying another pair of 2.3s. My feet felt like they
were on fire. But I stuck with them. They now feel amazing, but only with two pairs of socks. However, with only one pair the top
arch really digs into the ankle and feels weird.
From: Yash, 7/11
Comments: Jason's comments precisely describe my own experience as well. 2.3's fit me perfectly, 3.3's were a big
pain to break in (about 2 weeks) but have finally settled in and are comfortable, but the fit is still VERY different. It is definitely
more snug in the middle of the foot and there was TOO much support on the outside lateral edges. It could be that my foot is
incompatible with this type of high lateral support, but this was the principle source of discomfort during break-in, to the point
that I had to walk around in the shoes during the daytime to compress the shoe if I was to have any chance of them being
comfortable for a match in the afternoon. That being said, the actual performance of the shoe is remarkably good. I've never felt
that my split step has been more responsive than with this shoe, and there is impressive stability while on but there is enough
front flexibility for precise walking steps. It seems to be very good at shock reduction as well and has been kind to my joints.
Overall, I've been able to be more aggressive with my footwork, and as a result they are wearing out faster in outer front and rear
edges of the shoe than I typically wear out a CB 2.3, so it is difficult for me to say if the durability is higher. Overall, despite the
terrible break-in, the performance may be enough to keep me wearing this shoe. If the break-in is improved somewhat in the
next CB without losing much of the performance this would be a perfect shoe for me.
From: Anon. 07/11
Comments: Coming from a 2.3, I did not like the fit at first. I went half a size bigger and wore thinner socks.
Because I needed a pair of tennis shoes that are durable, I decided to go ahead and take the risk. I bended and twisted the shoe
multiple times before wearing and it felt broken in within the first half hour. Initially it took a while to get used to the narrower
mid section, but the broken in feel isn't that much different from the 2.3s after a while. The outsole is obviously chunkier and
more beefed up for increase durability which is a plus. I can see the improvements from 1.3-2.3 series, and am glad it is in the
areas I have mentioned before in my other reviews. The uppers felt supportive and actually not bad at all. Cushioning
(Air/Lunarlon) is great (when new) as usual and I do hope it will last as my 2.3s did not last long enough and became low
responsive. The laces could actually be longer, as I can't double knot it with its current length. For me, I don't slide on the upper
of the shoes, so having all that Dragon 2x is actually redundant. Hence, it increases weight(downside) and stiffness to the
upper.All in all the 3.3 is a good stable, supportive, durable shoe.
From: Bryan, 7/11
Comments: This is my second pair of 3.3s. I love them and have been playing with them for 7 months now. They
are so comfortable and durable. Contrary to previous comments, I actually like them better than the 2.3s.
From: Daniel. 7/11
Comments: Just got these shoes in the mail and wow I loved the cosmetics (green apple). It really stands out and
I'm glad I bought these instead of the propulse 3's since so many people are buying those... If you don't like a snug tight fit get a
half size up because I got my normal size and it was very snug. Also the shoe is narrow at the top but the things I liked were how
stable it felt and it seems to be very durable! To me the shoes feel great and I prefer this over my barricades any day I give it a
8/10. =)
From: Scott. 7/11
Comments: I have a been a big fan of the 2.3s and was very reluctant to try the 3.3s because of the reviews, but I
bit the bullet and went for a pair. I have to say, out of the box they feel terrible, very high arch and some general discomfort
throughout the footbed of the shoe. I placed my Superfeet insole in from my 2.3s and it made a difference. Here's the lowdown on
these shoes from someone who has worn its predecessors since Agassi came out with them. Weight: not lightweight feeling,
which based on the actual weight is about right, Nike could improve in this area but not like wearing clogs out there. Comfort: at
first not comfortable, after 25 minutes of play time I was actually surprised how comfortable they were - the high arch feeling
wasn't a problem after the very short initial break in period, I felt there was more room in the toe box than the 2.3s but I did
notice a little digging into my lower inside part of my ankle from the stiff rubber where the top eyelets were. Fit: I took the same
size as the 2.3's and they were fine, this shoe sits differently than the 2.3's, it's rockered on the bottom which mean that it's
angled like a banana on the sole but obviously not as dramatic, this is in stark contrast to the 2.3s which sit flat on the ground,
this rockering actually makes you a little quicker on the start/stops and turns without giving up traction. Traction was very good
and stability was excellent, I think that is due to the higher arch which stabilizes your foot and keeps it in a proper position
instead of canting inward. Durability seems great, but haven't used them enough yet to give a true review on this. To sum it up,
great looking shoe, a little heavier than the 2.3s but not too noticeable, very uncomfortable out of the box but doesn't take too
long to break in, my feet felt a little warmer than in the 2.3s so maybe there isn't as much breathability in these or maybe a warm
day? A little discomfort in the ankle area (hopefully this goes away), improved rockered sole makes for better movement.
Hopefully the next version will be a little lighter and more comfortable in certain areas out of the box, but I think I like these shoes
and am liking them more every time I play in them. Don't be scared off by the bad reviews, they're worth a try, and did I mention
that they come in great colors and look great.
From: Jason A. 7/11
Comments: If you are a fan of the previous incarnations, you should still try before
you buy. I loved the 2.3s but found these to be painfully narrow and stiff. I had to
adjust the laces many times to even out the pressure around my foot, and they still
pinch during certain transitions. I also find that the ankle cutout is set too far back on
the inside; my ankle rubs a bit in the front. I have played at least 10 times in them
now, and they have barely loosened up. The durability and traction are good, but I'm
already looking for replacements.
From: Dan. 6/11
Comments: I have used 2k10's for a few years and I love them but the durability just isn't there. I got these 3.3's
the other day and I love them. Slightly stiff first time on but took and hour or two on the court and they were perfect. I had to
order a half size up as they are a narrow shoe but with the half size extra they are a perfect fit. I drag my toe when I serve and
can see some wear happening already but lets see. Playing a tournament this weekend so it will be the ultimate test.
From: Matthew. 6/11
Comments: Well I was a big fan of the previous 2.3s right out of the box (bought 4
different colorways) last year. They actually feel like slippers when you slide into them. The 3.3s are a bit of a different creature.
Like the TW playtesters mention, they are stiff out of the box and the inner footbed feels a bit aggressive in the arch area. When I
put them on, I had to make a good amount of adjustments to even the pressure around the top of the foot. Lace them a bit wide
in the middle section of the laces and cinch them close towards the top.
The first 4 sets of doubles I played, I'd say they were still in breaking in mode, but they started to loosen up a bit. Today, I played
3 pretty hard core sets of singles and then they started to find their stride, I got that slipper like comfort that I got with the 2.3s.
These are a tiny bit wider in the forefoot than the 2.3s. I'd say definitely give them a chance and you'll be rewarded with a solidly
structured shoe with good comfort and a really nice design.
From: Curtis. 6/11
Comments: This shoe gave me blisters on both my pinkie toes. I love the
snugness and support but I guess you have to have a pretty narrow feet to enjoy
this shoe.
From: Hernan. 6/11
Comments: I've had these shoes about a week and have never experienced any of
the pain that many other users are experiencing. I actually found these shoes to
be more comfortable for me out of the box than the previous versions. These
shoes have great traction, but allow me to slide as well, and they feel a lot lighter
than the 17 ounces they supposedly weigh. Overall these shoes are fantastic, and
they look amazing! Good job Nike!
From: Wes. 6/11
Comments: When I ordered the shoes I looked at the reviews and wondered why I saw so many bad things about
this shoe. When I put them on I knew why so many tennis players didn't like them. They fit like soccer shoes. Narrow toe, fit to
foot kinda feeling. they are a bit slimmer than the 2.3 so depending on how you like your shoe to fit they may or may not be right
for you.
From: Pete. 6/11
Comments: I was definitely scared when I ordered these shoes seeing how many people bash them. They are my
first tennis shoes (I'm a beginner), and I spent so much time reading reviews for all sorts of shoes; I ended up hesitating between
these and the Barricades 6. I have narrow feet and tend to overpronate. A lot of people complain about how narrow these shoes
are, however, for me, the fit is great. I was a bit scared I wouldn't get enough support on the arch, so I ordered Superfeet insoles
as well. As it turns out, I did not need them at all! The fit is great, my feet feel well enveloped by the shoe, and the more I wear
them, the more natural and comfortable they become. The ortho-lite insoles that are already inside do provide great support. The
shoes are indeed stiff at first, but I didn't need a lot of walking around before they started to feel good. Overall, I'm really happy
about my choice.
From: Joki. 6/11
Comments: I bought these shoes around mid-April, and I absolutely hated them for the first few weeks. They had
the worst break-in period I have ever had in a tennis shoe. My feet were hurting terribly, and I couldn't wait to take them off. That
being said, after about three weeks of break in, these shoes were as comfortable of a tennis shoe as I have ever worn before.
Before you write these shoes off as soon as you buy them, you need to wear them for a couple of weeks and let them break in.
From: Faiz. 5/11
Comments: HORRIBLE FIT... Way too Narrow in the Toe Box area. I'm returning them as I type this. The shoe is
soooo narrow and my feet felt like needles pushing the sides of feet. Going back to Adidas Barricades. Love the style but after
teaching 5-10 on the court for the first day I was in tears. My feet now hurt even when the shoes are not on.
From: Johnny B Good Tonight. 5/11
Comments: Incredible shoe. It is solid and locks your feet in, has a nice response to the ground with good traction
and seemingly durable. I went through three pairs of shoes so far this year. Break in is required but if you wear it around for two
days around the house and then play two hours on it it lightens up.
From: CRC. 5/11
Comments: Durability on these shoes is not very good. I play at least 10 hours a week and they were completely
worn out on the bottom. Other than that I think that they feel pretty good but you definitely need a break in period. I think it
might have been the insole that was hurting the outside part of my foot. It felt kind of like a foot cramp. Very uncomfortable but it
went away after about 2 weeks.
From: Alex. 5/11
Comments: These shoes remind me of Barricades. They're stiff out of the
box, a little tight, but after a couple of hours on court (yes, there's
a price to pay), they molded to my foot and became like a part of me on
the court. They're not as cushioned as the 2.3, but they feel a little
more stable and maneuverable. Anyhow, I'm a strong, fairly big guy (4.5 player), and I play an aggressive all court style of tennis,
singles and doubles. Shoes that are too soft or light
tend to not have nearly enough lateral stability for me, so I'm happy to
break in a pair that will last a long time without breaking down and
becoming too soft. They don't feel heavy to me, they feel solid.
Traction is good. I fit into a half size smaller than I did in the 2.3.
I like them.
From: Anon. 5/11
Comments: These were pretty uncomfortable. Too narrow and very misleading fit compared to
the other CB's. They actually gave me a blister on my toe, this has never happened to me
before in a tennis shoe. Also, durability isn't as good as the 2.3 or 1.3. The only thing I liked
about this shoe is the colorway and the stability. For now, I'm going back to the 2k10's, those are
an awesome shoe! Also, a recommendation to TW, you guys really should put narrow fit in the
description, its really misleading because i have an average width fit, and it was just way too
From: Grant. 5/11
Comments: Wow the break in sucks. Then it starts to get better. I like the fact it's snug to my foot but is
uncomfortable almost. I have played on it for 3 weeks 6 hours a week and can't even tell I've worn the shoes, so durability is great.
From: Mark. 5/11
Comments: I am trying my best to like this shoe. It is very stable and has good cushioning. The shoe is by far the
heaviest tennis shoe I have ever worn. My biggest complaint is with the width in the midfoot. I have seen several complaints
about the toe box but have no issues there. I have worn these about 10 times and I have yet to complete a match with them on. I
have to switch to another pair to finish my match because of foot pain. I keep thinking they will eventually get better but they
haven't. I like for my tennis shoes to feel tight but these are just plain misery on my feet. I hope Nike makes some adjustments
because it is a great looking shoe.
From: Shane. 5/11
Comments: Strange fit. I have no problem with Adidas or Asics shoes but these just didn't work. In Asics I wear an
11 but I needed a 12 in these Nike 3.3s to be able to put them on. And then there was too much shoe in the front. I would label
these these as narrow with a low instep. If you need a generous D width then I'll save you some time and look elsewhere.
Attractive looking in real life so it's too bad.
From: Ron. 5/11
Comments: So I have owned 1.3, 2.3, and now the 3.3. One of my pairs of 2.3 were the
greatest shoe I have every owned, not just tennis shoe, but most comfortable shoe period.
For some reason the two other pairs of 2.3's I have aren't the same. That being said, it took me a while to warm to the 3.3's looks
and once I got them, it took a while to warm to the feel. Initially out of the box the inner side of the toe box was tight but
everything else seemed okay. Once I got on the court the outer mid-sole hurt just like my non-good pairs of 2.3's. I was a bit
disappointed at first, but I decided to give the shoe the benefit of the doubt and kept wearing them. I stuffed some socks into the
shoe and laced them up real tight for two days, I then put
them back on and got on the court. Toe box was better, but still had the mid-sole problem. However, withing 30 minutes of
moving around and sweating a little the sole started to form to my foot and feel much better. I can honestly say that though I'm
annoyed I had to break them in a bit, they are now number 2 on my list of shoes. It took some patience but I now have a set of
flashy 'gloves' for shoes.
From: Daniel. 5/11
Comments: This shoe did not fit like a glove fresh out the box. It took me about 10 hours of serious court time to
break these bad boys in. The first 2 hours did not feel good at all, but now they have loosened up they have a great solid yet
comfortable fit. Don't give up on 'em - they will grow on you. The shoelace broke on the 3rd week of use which has never
happened with me on a Nike sneaker before - maybe I just got a dud.
From: Marty. 5/11
Comments: The most uncomfortable shoe. Even after you break it in it still kills your feet. Among other things, it's
overpriced and is heavier than most other shoes I've played with. I
know it looks pretty cool and received a few complements, but it's just not
worth the pain.
From: KB, Bend, OR, USA. 5/11
Comments: These are very stiff and uncomfortable out of the box compared to the previous model. I found them
to be too tight in the toebox, and very uncomfortable in the heel. A huge letdown from the 2.3.
From: Anon. 5/11
Comments: The shoes still feel great and I have a lot of wear almost close
to holes but not yet. However, I guess because I always wear these and wear them a lot due to the tennis season I have to buy new
shoes because the straps that wrap around under the foot and up the side to become lace loops, two of them have broken on the
right foot and 1 on the left which makes lacing the shoe awkward because now it doesn't fit as tightly as it did before. I love the
shoe but am not taking chances with another pair. I'm going to another nike shoe, a previous model the Breathe Cage II.
From: Ashton, Mayslanding, NJ, U.S. 5/11
Comments: Worst shoes ever! Do not buy! I bought these shoes and they killed my feet, like to the point that I
could barely walk. I have had them for three months, and gotten insoles and they still hurt. Also, they have a hole already, and I
hate them. The Lunar Vapor 8s are way more worth it.
From: Rob. 5/11
Comments: I was sliding all over the court. These shoes are very comfortable, though.
From: Parker, San Antonio, Texas. 5/11
Comments: A very interesting shoe. It took a while to break in, but once it was broken in it was pretty comfortable.
A month later they started hurting my feet again. Personally I don't think there is enough padding in the shoe, and after a week
with it I put in a new insole. The durability isn't bad, but isn't amazing, after about 3 months with them they have completely
worn through. At first they cut off the circulation in my foot, it's gotten better, but still not good. Overall a real disappointer.
From: Garrett, South Jordan, UT, USA. 5/11
Comments: At first I was wondering if I should return the shoes to Tennis
Warehouse because the fit was so uncomfortable. The blood circulation in
my feet would start to get cut off, and the arch of my feet would
seriously ache after only a short time on the courts/walking. However,
after around 2-3 weeks of constant wear (and perseverance), the shoes are
amazing. Not sure about durability yet, but it definitely gets a lot more
From: Anon. 4/11
Comments: I was skeptical about buying this shoe due to some of the negative comments
about poor fits that I read on this page. When I got the shoe, it seemed they were right.
However after maybe 5 hours of court time, these have become the most comfortable shoes I
have ever bought. The grip is also wonderful. It gives me a great hard-court slide, and great
traction as well. Pretty good looking shoes if I may say so as well! So I definitely recommend
this shoe to anyone and everyone, and don't be deterred by the initial tight fit. I will be
buying another pair of these when the time comes!
From: Tommy, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA. 4/11
Comments: By far, the best looking shoe I have had; I get SO many compliments from others.
In regards to fit, it fits very well if you don't have to put in orthodics. I have been trying to break these shoes in with orthodics but
they just hurt too much; I suspect the arch support is too high without them. Even though it is a heavy shoe, it really doesn't feel
that way. Fits true to size.
From: Thomas, Lincoln, NE. 4/11
Comments: When I first put this pair of shoes on, I was skeptical of
how long I could actually bear with them. True, they gave me a lot
more support than the Vapor line, which I've worn for years. Every
single edition of the Vapors have given me unmatched comfort and are
extremely light, but my gripes with them were the durability. That led
me to try the Courtballistecs out. The break-in period for me was
around 2 weeks, or around 16 hours of use, and that was even after I'd
stretched the shoes out and laced them loosely. The break-in was
incredibly painful and tedious for me, and I couldn't get used to the
extra weight. However, after breaking them in, I can honestly say that
they exceeded most of my expectations. I feel that the comfort level
is comparable to the Vapors, although nothing can beat them of course.
They offer the support that was kind of lacking in the Vapors.
Durability remains yet to be seen, but so far I can only see slight
wear in the toe area. Overall, I've come to love these shoes, and
anyone who can tolerate the break-in period should definitely get
From: Mark. 4/11
Comments: This shoe is just... amazing.. Stability is great, durability is great plus the six month durability warranty.
I can slide slightly but not too much to actually have a negative effect. Looks good, is good; no wonder Nadal wears this shoe
without complaint.
From: Johnathen Fohn, Seattle, WA, US. 4/11
Comments: I've been playing with the 2.3 for about a year now. When I tried the 3.3, my feet never felt such pain.
This shoe is a lot more narrow and the arch support is too high. The only thing I like about this shoe is the way it looks.
From: Jessie, Honolulu, HI, USA. 4/11
Comments: Fit my foot like an absolute glove! Upgrading from the Nike Breathe Cage II, which in my opinion is also
a very good shoe but definitely does not fit as nice as this. This shoe also has great traction I'm a very quick 5.0 level player that
typically punishes my shoes pretty badly. Not sure about durability yet haven't had them that long. One semi-annoying thing I
found though was inside of the shoes by the ankle is kind of stiff and comes up a little higher then I'm used to so it kind of digs
into my ankle sometimes when I get really stretched out but I think that will go away over time.
From: Anon, USA, 03/11
Comments: This had to be the best tennis shoe purchase I have ever made, if you are looking for a durable,
comfortable, all around well-fitting shoe, then I totally recommend this shoe.
From: Wesley, 03/11
Comments: Excellent shoe, Nike really did it this time. Best of the court ballistic series so far and best shoe out on
the market for my money. This shoe required no break in for me and it's comfort is unbelievable. Absorbs impact very well and I
need that, 6'3 195 frame.
From: Rick, Miami, FL, USA, 03/11
Comments: Great shoe. A narrow toe box, which keeps your feet locked into the shoe for a very direct feel.
Together with a slight inward/forward leaning profile of the shoe, this makes this shoe very 'active' and just what I need for my
From: Richard, 03/11
Comments: The Court-Ballistec 3.3 is an excellent shoe for me due to the "explosive friendliness" style it gives me
when playing. I play at the 4.0 level, and I am a Nadal-like explosive player. This shoe incorporates great traction, durability,
speed, and weightlessness, not to mention it's a pretty stylin' shoe. Nike has really outdone themselves.
From: John, Gate City, VA, USA, 03/11
Comments: This shoe is all right after two weeks of break in. Its durability is awful, but it gets great slide on hard
courts. For the first two weeks, it hurt my feet. I loved the 2.3 and the 3.3 isn't the same.
From: Hugh, 03/11
Comments: These shoes are awesome! Been using barricade VI since January 2011 and I finally sent them in for the
6 month warranty. Wanted to try something new and these shoes feel a lot better. I feel quicker on the recovery, letting me cover
more ground on the court. Only bad part was that it took me 3 days to break them in though. Had to take 10 minute breaks every
30 minutes because my meaty part of my feet felt like it was on fire haha...
From: Carlo, Northridge, CA, USA, 03/11
Comments: These shoes are the best shoes ever! I now get to practically every ball on the court with ease! Thanks
tennis warehouse!
From: Jonathan, Erie, PA, USA, 03/11
Comments: Was a long term Adidas Barricade fan, had B 2-6. Switch to Nike CB 2.3 when Barricade 6 failed to
continue its predecessors' specs. Nike CB 3.3 in many ways is better than CB 2.3 and Barricade 6. Fit, cushioning, traction,
support... Down side is that it is much heavier and the break in time is significant longer than any of the previous models as it is
noticeably narrower than CB 2.3. Overall it is an improvement to CB 2.3.
From: GS, 03/11
Comments: Great shoe, also a converted Barricade user. On par with the barricade V, but with better cushioning
and a bit more stability on the forefoot. Only negative is the looks, a little too much, especially the inside is kind of too busy, but
that's a personal taste thing!
From: Jason, NH, USA, 02/11
Comments: Couldn't have asked for better. I'm typically an adidas Barricade person but after this shoe I don't think
I'll be going back. The stability and traction with this shoe allow for quick sharp movements. Love the shoe. Good job Nike
From: Jonathan, Denver, CO, USA, 02/11
Comments: I love these shoes. I upgraded from 2.1's to these and they are great. They are narrow, just how I like
them. Little heavier than my 2.1's. I haven't hit the courts with them yet, but I know they will hold up. The cosmetics on this shoe
From: Nes, Chicago, IL, USA, 02/11
Comments: I've used all three generations of this shoe from the 1.3, 2.3, and now 3.3. And I have to say the 2.3s
greatly surpass the 3.3s on several different levels. The 2.3s are more comfortable, flexible, durable, and I feel the cosmetic is
better too. Don't get me wrong the 3.3s are a good shoe and I will probably continue buying them, but they didn't update them
well. I didn't like the fact they made them more like the Breathe Cage II, the shoes look very similar and feel very similar. (For me
the Breathe Cages II were too stiff.) Also the tongue of the shoe has become shorter, and I already disliked the uni-tongue style
they used. I'm not one to and usually don't complain about discomfort in my tennis shoes but these ones are noticeably more
uncomfortable (and somewhat cut off circulation.)
From: Ace, NORCAL, CA, USA, 02/11
Comments: Just played a tournament match last night in these, they are terrific. Only my 2nd time wearing them,
but performed very nicely. I am usually a slow guy, but last night I was sliding around and getting to every ball. These shoes
definitely helped me pull out the tough win. Another keeper by Nike.
From: Robert, New York, NY, USA, 02/11
Comments: Please do a review on these shoes ASAP. Thanks.
From: Douglas, 02/11
(Our testers are currently testing the shoes, look for our review in about a month. --TW Staff)
Comments: The 3.3s take a while to break in and they cut off the circulation in your feet. After a few hours
practicing in them and than playing in them for another couple they feel great. The secret to breaking them in faster is to wear
them with your laces untied so all of the mesh and stuff adjusts to your foot. Overall very good shoe if you're playing tennis for
extended periods of time.
From: Jack, 01/11
Comments: Coming from the CB 2.3 to the 3.3 and having no problems adjusting. Did the Nadal twist and bend
routine on the shoes and immediately played a whole day (6 hours) in them. No blisters or soreness. No break-in required, at least
for me. They fit my feet much better than the 2.3s.
The 3.3s are a definitely stiffer but not to any detrimental effect. The 2.3 are soft and comfortable, almost too soft, probably explains why I went through 2 pairs in 6 months.
Overall 3.3s have moved the game on for me. Lucky for me Nike has catered for my foot shape, they are the best fitting tennis shoes I ever had the pleasure to wear.
From: Anon, 01/11
Comments: Had about 2-3 hours of court time with this shoe; had both a practice session and a match with it. It is
not broken in yet. The 3.3 pinches my feet and feels heavier than the 2.3 model which I also own. Finding myself switching to the
old 2.3's in the middle of the match.
From: GS, 01/11
Comments: These shoes are AMAZING hands down!! They provide a great all around feel on the court and the
design/cosmetics of the shoe just look fantastic. I've never felt pain when using these shoes and I have found that my enthusiasm
for the sport itself has returned. It's incredible how far a good pair of shoes such as these impact your game
From: Jaleel, Fortworth, TX, USA, 01/11
Comments: Before TW comes out with their review of the shoe, after nearly 3 weeks in
it, here is mine:
Comfort Score: 4.5- while more firm than the CB 2.3, still a great fit and good cushioning while improving the court feel of the shoe after the shoe is broken in (which does take about 2-3 days, which is KEY as the shoe does take a while to gain softness and become more pliable). Once broken in, this shoe really molds to your foot. While not as plush as its predecessor, the CB 3.3 is very much like crossing the CB 2.3 with the Barricade 6.0. Length fit is standard. Width is medium. Arch support is medium height. Solid!
Ventilation Score: 4.3- very comparable to the CB 2.3 in this regard.
Arch Support Score: 4.3- vastly improved over the CB 2.3
Foot Support/Stability Score: 5.0- the most stable shoe I have ever worn (without being restricting in any way). This is where this shoe shines! You can really feel the extra stability on the medial side of the upper and the effect of the new Archfit lacing system, which is connected to internal straps for an amazing customized fit. This is no hype; the shoe is part of your foot.
Sole Durability - Score TBA- we will see over the next few weeks, but from appearances, this would look to be a beefier sole and on a par with the Barricade 6.0. The DragOn 2x material on the upper looks to be a vast improvement over the original DragOn. Features a six-month outsole durability guarantee.
Traction Score: 4.6- the XDR sole improves traction over the CB 2.3 and has great grip on the hard court surface, yet not too sticky.
Weight Score: 4.2- while weighing 17.5 ozs., this shoe feels to be about the same as the CB 2.3 (16.9 ozs.) on the foot and has the feel of a more serious hard-court shoe.
Overall - Score: 4.7 - Truly, this shoe is a fantastic blend of comfort, performance and durability. In my opinion, this is the finest tennis shoe ever made to date by any maker (and I have tried them all). Thumbs way, way, WAY up!
From: Anon, SoCal, USA, 01/11
Comments: I am a big fan Nike Rafa shoes, look nice but they're so heavy now. It seems my speed is slower than
From: Andy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 01/11
Comments: Just bought my 3.3 ballistec today. Tried using it immediately, and felt this pain on my foot. I had to
stop playing because of the discomfort. Later I discovered that I laced it too tight and didn't realize that the lacing system of the
3.3 is just different. The fit itself is really good. The best! I've been using the Ballistec series since it came out and never looked
any other way. All I can say is that the 3.3: "THE BEST" of all the series. After the few minutes of "break-in" period, I'd have to say
that my game has never been better!!!
From: FRANK, USA, 01/11
Comments: Beautiful shoe out of the box; it took me just half an hour to break mine in and they feel great on my
feet, even with ankle braces, which squeeze my feet. I could play for hours in these, I would recommend these shoes to anyone,
great shoes, and great job once again Nike.
From: Ashton, Mays Landing, NJ, USA, 01/11
Comments: I'm a huge Rafa, Nike, and Red fan, so I loved the look of these shoes. Unfortunately they were stiff and
I ended up with even a blister on my ankle. First pair of Nikes that I have had to return. I'm going to try the new red Roddick
Babolat Pro Pulse 3s now. (Fingers crossed).
From: Rex, Sactown, CA, USA, 01/11
Comments: Coming from Courtballistec 1.3s (which I love so much and thought it would be hard to beat), these are
simply DYNAMITE shoes! It's A LOT more stable, faster and I feel it protects the ankle very well. To me it feels very quick and
maneuverable. I'm loving the black/yellow/white cosmetics, just like the 1.3s I had.
From: Denis, 01/11
Comments: Just got my Courtballistec 3.3's and they are amazing. Probably the most durable and comfortable shoe
on the market. It feels like it'll take about a week though to break them in. Other than that, they are everything you would want in
a shoe, durability, speed and comfort.
From: Grant, Bakersfield, CA, USA, 01/11
Comments: WOW, this shoe is fantastic! Very stylish and exceeds expectations. The XDR (X-tra Durable Rubber) is
definitely improved with grooves and thicker rubber. In addition, the AirMax on the heel is not as susceptible to friction to the
court as much because of the rubber sole covering some of the inside part of the AirMax The shoe is very breathable and
comfortable, it's as if it hugs your foot. However, the only downside is that that the shoe is somewhat heavy. If you are new to the
Courtballistec Series, you will find them heavy. If you've been using the Courtballistec Series, there isn't much of a difference.
Comfort: 10/10
Durability: 10/10
Weight: 8/10
From: John, Collegeville, PA, USA, 01/11


text:
CoPA is a fine arts photography organization that provides members with the tools, resources and experiences to become better photographers. Through Milwaukee photo exhibitions, annual juried events, an impressive speaker series, exciting workshops, portfolio reviews and so much more, CoPA inspires each member to take their work to the next level.
Photographs have the power to change the world. We will help you tell those stories.Learn more about CoPABecome a Member

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Detail Images
Current Color
Temporarily Out Of Stock
Don't get too bummed. This item is on the way and will be available for purchase as soon as it rolls into the warehouse.
Can't wait? Consider one of the other Men's Hiking and Climbing Pants we have in stock.View Similar Products
3 Reviews
They've got you covered.
The Craghoppers Men's NosiLife Convertible Trousers are well equipped to handle the unexpected as you trek across the globe. NosiLife nylon wicks moisture, dries quickly, and provides a UPF 40 sun protection, while the Insect Shield repels biting insects. Zip-off convertibility means you can change these pants to shorts when the weather warms up, and ankle zips help you pull the pants on over hiking shoes. Craghoppers also added elastic bands at the waist for a snug fit, tape at the heel for longevity, an integrated drybag to help keep your electronics dry in wet weather, and a phone holder in the cargo pocket for your convenience.
- Nylon
- UPF 40 sun protection
- Insect Shield insect repellent technology
- Regular fit
- Partially elasticized waist
- Ankle zips
- 9 pockets
- Item #CRG001I
Tech Specs
Tech Specs
- Reviews
What do you think about this product?
Have questions about this product?
Great Product
These are the most versatile pants in my closet. I can rarely find an occasion where these don't come in handy (minus NE winters!)
Craghoppers NosiLife
Nosilife Convertible Trousers
- Familiarity: I returned this product before using it
- Fit: Runs small
- Size Bought: 34 Regular
Great pair of trousers BUT as stated in past comments, I ordered 34 regular, they came and fit smaller so after talking to customer service they sent out a pair of 36.
Customer service with this company totally rocks.
Perfect for women, too!
- Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
- Fit: Runs small
- Size Bought: 30/32
The men's size 30/32 fit perfectly for a woman size 4! So happy to find a pair with UPF and insect repellent that look great on a woman. The asphalt grey is a great color, much better than the colors offered in the women's convertible pants. These are great looking and have all you need for backpacking!
Men's 30R is definitely not a size 30.
Nice looking pants but are much smaller than advertised.
Agreed! I would say they run more like a men's 28 waist. :)


text:
Far Out LOOP
11,409pages onAdd New Page
this wiki
this wiki
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you've made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
|This article or section is Under Construction.
- "Road Loop"
- ―-Race description
Far Out LOOP is a Rockstar verified race featured in GTA Online.


text:
Discussion in 'Religion and Lighthearted Discussion' started by BadMoFo, Apr 18, 2008.
this was a nice to read.
Yea, I know its going to sound cold, and whatever, but I dont really care about him, the jets, his daughter or the pope.
Except maybe his daughter who is too young to be disliked simply because Daddy is a Jet
untill you see him walking around with her on a jets onsies, or whatever those things are called. Then she can get tackled just like the rest of them...just playing
or am I?
or maybe not?
Mods - Shouldn't this thread be under "other topics"?
It's a kid. It is made to be disliked. (Half-joke)
gold jacket, green jacket, who gives a sh*t
I'm sure the Pope was just trying to prove that he loves little boys AND little girls.
one of the most corupt originizations.
The Jets or the Catholic Church?
Nice story, and one that Clemens will have to help fill his old age with happy memories.
Thats good, because they wont be football memories.
I don't want to offend anyone, so I will leave out my views of the Pope and the Church. But this story really does nothing for me. I am sure this was a great personal experience for Clemens. Good for him.
Separate names with a comma.


text:
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has put out a list of things you should do to keep your dog safe on Thanksgiving.
If you decide to feed your pet a little nibble of turkey, make sure it's boneless and well-cooked.
Don't offer her raw or undercooked turkey, which may contain salmonella bacteria.
Sage can make your Thanksgiving stuffing taste delicious, but it and many other herbs contain essential oils and resins that can cause gastrointestinal upset and central nervous system depression to pets if eaten in large quantities.
Cats are especially sensitive to the effects of certain essential oils.
Don't spoil your pet's holiday by giving him raw bread dough.
According to ASPCA experts, when raw bread dough is ingested, an animal's body heat causes the dough to rise in his stomach. As it expands, the pet may experience vomiting, severe abdominal pain and bloating, which could become a life-threatening emergency, requiring surgery.
A few small boneless pieces of cooked turkey, a taste of mashed potato or even a lick of pumpkin pie shouldn't pose a problem.
If you're baking up Thanksgiving cakes, be sure your pets keep their noses out of the batter, especially if it includes raw eggs—they could contain salmonella bacteria that may lead to food poisoning.
However, don't allow your pets to overindulge, as they could wind up with a case of stomach upset, diarrhea or even worse—an inflammatory condition of the pancreas known as pancreatitis. In fact, it's best keep pets on their regular diets during the holidays.
While the humans are chowing down, give your cat and dog their own little feast.
Offer them Nylabones or made-for-pet chew bones or stuff their usual dinner—perhaps with a few added tidbits of turkey, vegetables (try sweet potato or green beans) and dribbles of gravy—inside a Kong toy. They'll be happily occupied for awhile, working hard to extract their dinner from the toy.
No email address was supplied by
To complete your registration on this site, please supply an address.
Please confirm or modify the email address to which you will have subscription offers sent.
For a more personalized experience, please supply the following optional information.


text:
Stewart was a true gentleman
MORGANTOWN – Bill Stewart, who has been deceased since May 21, 2012, was one of the most widely liked and most highly respected football coaches West Virginia University ever had.
Don Nehlen hired him in 2000, the last of Nehlen's 21 years as the school's winningest head coach. Then Stewart served under Rich Rodriguez from 2001-08.
When Rodriguez departed hastily for the Michigan job, the New Martinsville native took over the Mountaineer reins as interim head coach for the 2008 Fiesta Bowl battle against nationally No. 3-ranked Oklahoma. What followed was that most memorable 48-28 smashing of the Sooners.
That tremendous triumph earned Stewart the head job on the spot. It was his before daybreak that Jan. 2 night, then-athletic-director Ed Pastilong recalls.
"We had already interviewed several people before that bowl game,"
Pastilong said. "Bill did not politick for the job. But he did tell me that he'd 'like to be considered.'
"So when we got back to the hotel, we made sure we contacted the (WVU) president, the chairman of the Board of Governors, the Athletic Council chairman, and others involved in the decision."
By 3 a.m. the next day they had already named Stewart as the permanent head coach. And word went out to the media that a press conference would be held at 9 a.m. the next day.
The rest is history.
Stewart, who died of an apparent heart attack while playing golf with Pastilong and others at the Stonewall Jackson Resort, had addressed a W.Va. Tourism Association function there the previous evening.
He had the most successful first three years of any WVU head football coach in history. His teams combined for records of 9-4, 9-4, and 9-4.
Stewart's overall 28-12 mark rounds out to an overall percentage of .700. His teams were 2-2 in bowl games.
A gentleman in every respect, he was a great coach who certainly knew football and loved his players, his coaches and Mountaineer fans.
Stewart also loved people generally and the state of West Virginia.
I saw him at his folksy best just six days before he died.
Having breakfast at a local restaurant, he spotted a group of men nearby and was invited over.
Stewart chatted briefly, then went and shook hands with all 15 Tuesday breakfast club members.
I'm told that was typical of him.
Stewart, who coached as an assistant at 11 major colleges during his career, served two separate stints at North Carolina and the Air Force Academy.
Stewart, who also was head coach at VMI from 1994-96, was forced to resign at WVU one year earlier than had been projected.
So DanaHolgorsen took over in 2011 and went 10-3 with the popular Stewart's players.
Truth be known, Bill Stewart's legacy is even greater in the minds of loving Mountaineer fans in growing numbers who knew him, respected him,
and loved him.
Here's what quarterback Pat White said following that 2008 Fiesta Bowl:
"He deserved it. A great man. A great coach. All the players respect
him and all the players love him.
"You couldn't ask for a better man to lead us to victory."
Pastilong has never doubted that Stewart was the right man for the job.
"He was respected tremendously by other coaches in top programs
throughout the nation," he said.
"He knew all facets of football. He also was pleasant, sincerely
genuine. And I think his players and coaching staff knew that."


text:
A dive team in Eau Claire County has recovered a man's body from a pond near Augusta.
Sheriff's officials say they got a call about 7 p.m. Tuesday about a missing family member. The caller feared the family member might have broken through thin ice on a pond behind their farm in the Town of Bridge Creek.
WEAU-TV reports crews searched the pond and divers recovered the body about 8 p.m.


text:
Bizarre Foods Delicious Destinations
Tues 9|8c
Booze Traveler
All New Dec 12 at 10|9c
Expedition Unknown
Wednesdays at 9|8c
Hotel Tipping Etiquette 01:48
Tour South Africa 02:33
North Carolina
$10K Grand Prize: Winter Escape Sweepstakes
San Domenico Palace Hotel 02:30
Hotel Anassa 02:51
Hotel Hacienda 02:21
Hotel Almyra 02:44
Planet Primetime
Loco in Mexico
8am | 7c
Putin on the Skates
8:30amam | 7:30amc
Anthony Bourdain: No Reservations
Eastern Hemisphere Files - Volume 2
9am | 8c
Latin America Files - Volume 3
10am | 9c
Europe Files - Volume 4
11am | 10c
Asia Files - Volume 5
12pm | 11c
Food Paradise
Hot & Spicy Paradise 2
1pm | 12c
Big Beef Paradise
2pm | 1c
Bizarre Foods
United Kingdom
3pm | 2c
Embassy Row
4pm | 3c
5pm | 4c
6pm | 5c
Expedition Unknown
The Lost Tomb of Attila the Hun
7pm | 6c
Kalahari Desert's Lost City
8pm | 7c
Greatest Treasure Hunts
9pm | 8c
Secrets of the Nazca
10pm | 9c
The Vanished Empire
11pm | 10c
12am | 11c
1am | 12c
2am | 1c
3am | 2c
Learn about amazing travel experiences. Sign up for the Travel Channel newsletter.
Thanks for signing up. Check out more newsletters from Travel Channel.
Join the party! Don't miss Travel Channel in your favorite social media feeds.


text:
by Anton Shilov
Samsung Electronics and Micron Technology, both among the largest memory makers in the world, have created a consortium for OEMs, enablers and integrators that will collaborate in developing and implementing an open interface specification for an innovative new memory technology called the hybrid memory cube (HMC).
Micron and Samsung are the founding members of the hybrid memory cube consortium (HMCC), and will work closely with fellow developers Altera Corp., Open- Silicon and Xilinx to collectively accelerate industry efforts in bringing to market a broad set of technologies. The consortium will initially define a specification to enable applications ranging from large-scale networking to industrial products and high-performance computing.
One of the primary challenges facing the industry – and a key motivation for forming the HMCC – is that the memory bandwidth required by high-performance computers and next- generation networking equipment has increased beyond what conventional memory architectures can provide. The term "memory wall" has been used to describe the problem.
Breaking through the memory wall requires a new architecture that can provide increased density and bandwidth at significantly reduced power consumption. HMC capabilities are a leap beyond current and near-term memory architectures in the areas of performance, packaging and design efficiencies. By defining an industry interface specification for developers, manufacturers and architects, the consortium is committed to making HMC a successful new high-performance memory technology.
Intel Corp. demonstrated HMC at Intel Developer Forum in September, 2011. The Hybrid Memory Cube – which was jointly designed by Intel and Micron – demonstrates a new approach to memory design delivering a 7-fold improvement in energy-efficiency over today's DDR3. Hybrid Memory Cube uses a stacked memory chip configuration, forming a compact "cube", and uses a new, highly efficient memory interface which sets the bar for energy consumed per bit transferred while supporting data rates of 1Tb/s (one trillion bits per second). This research technology could lead to dramatic improvements in servers optimized for cloud computing as well as ultrabooks, televisions, tablets and smartphones.
"This collaborative industry effort will serve as an accelerator for highly promising technology that will benefit the entire industry. The consortium will help to bring about a game-changing system solution for system designers and manufacturers that is expected to outperform memory options offered today," said Jim Elliott, vice president of memory marketing and product planning at Samsung Semiconductor.
HMC could lead to unprecedented levels of memory performance and facilitate new applications in networking, medical, energy, wireless communications, transportation, security and other markets. For example, the development of systems and technologies will enable a more efficient, reliable and secure smart grid infrastructure with integrated renewable energy resources.
"HMC is unlike anything currently on the radar. HMC brings a new level of capability to memory that provides exponential performance and efficiency gains that will redefine the future of memory. Guidance by the industry consortium will help drive the fastest possible adoption of the technology, resulting in what we believe will be radical improvements to computing systems," said Robert Feurle, Micron's vice president for DRAM marketing.
The HMCC's memory specifications will be co-developed among the consortium members. The consortium is open to an unlimited number of adopters, with the opportunity to receive early access to draft specifications and participate in specification discussions and development.


text:
Make money work for you, rather than you working for money!
The difference between extraordinarily wealthy people and those struggling to make ends meet is often just a matter of knowledge.
Yet despite spending perhaps 12 years at school (and often more at university), most people have not learned how to become financially free - and hence the seemingly never-ending struggle.
Avenues to Wealth teaches you what you wish school had taught you - how to create streams of income that deposit money into your bank account whether you are working, playing, sleeping or on a 6-month cruise.
Not only do we teach you the skills, we equip you with the strategies, tactics, and opportunities to achieve financial freedom in record time.
Accordingly, A2W encourages and assists you to change the way you think about money. It is well known that the biggest folly is to do the same thing day in day out and expect different results.
Many of us have given years to schooling only to find ourselves on the left side of the cashflow quadrant where we trade our time for money, and enjoy no leverage. If you really want to move to the right side, you need financial H.E.L.P.
A2W Presents you with a NEW School, where you can learn by involvement, and in 5 years re-write your story and move on to become financially free.
The normal 40yr career plan does not guarantee your retirement plan. If you don't plan for yourself, you may end up like 88% of workers, who end up either broke or dead at 65.
We have a time tested system, that allows you to enrol in the school of involvement, learn, help others to learn as you become a teacher yourself and make the same thing happen for others.


text:
Tuesday is an important day at the Wave. The morning sees the staff putting the final touches on the week's edition, rapidly trying to meet our printing deadline so that you receive your paper the following morning.
Twelve years ago however, that morning changed each of us forever.
We each arrived at work looking pale and shell shocked, hugging each other and offering our support to make it through this trying time. Though we were on the outskirts of this tragedy, it touched us all deeply.
Someone brought a small television to the office to better follow the morning's attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. We all sat with silent tears running down our cheeks trying, not unlike the rest of the world, to make some sense of what we were witnessing.
Numbly, we went about our normal routine of getting the paper put to bed. The news doesn't wait for anyone, no matter the tragedy.
It was one of the hardest issues we've ever put out.
On that fateful day, 2,819 people lost their lives including 343 fire fighters and paramedics; 23 NYPD officers; and 37 Port Authority officers.
These people lost their lives trying to save so many others.
Let not a year go by that we don't pause on September 11 and remember those lives lost.
Let us also celebrate daily the freedoms we enjoy that were won through much bloodshed and tears.
Let us teach our children tolerance and love for their fellow man so that they hopefully will never have to experience something like this tragedy again in their lifetimes.
God bless each of us and may we never forget.


text:
I wonder if any one could help me. I would like to have ranking images on my forum. Its a site for our club. The club intrest is air cooled vw, the old beetle. So if anyone know where i could find images like vw sign or wolfsburg sign or any car sign as typ1, typ2, typ3 cars (old beetle, notch, karman ghia) or could make this for my i would be really thankful.
[REQUEST] VW Rank Images
Forum to require and offer php jobs. Are you searching for php developers to make or complete your php script ? This place is for you.
Moderators: macek, egami, gesf
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Last Samuray
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 3:09 am
- swirlee
- Moderator
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 1:18 pm
- Location: A bunk in the back
- Contact:
9 times out of 10 you won't have to worry about it. (Actually, your odds are far better than that, even.) But some people are aware of copyright laws and will use them against you if you've used their copyrighted work without permission. The best policy is to assume that nothing is in the public domain unless the web site specifically states that is.
And anyway, it's polite to ask for permission. Whatever happened to common courtesy?
And anyway, it's polite to ask for permission. Whatever happened to common courtesy?
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests


text:
"I am a cradle Catholic and my husband of eight years just went through RCIA this Easter. Praise the Lord! His conversion was due, in large part, to your show and the awesome answers of Tim Staples, Jimmy Akin, and the rest of the gang. Your show has helped me, my now husband, grow deeply in love with the Church."
~ Patty
"Deo Gratias!"
~ Oliver Plunket, Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of all Ireland, Saint; after being sentenced to death, he joyfully declared "Thanks be to God" in front of all; on July 11, 1681, Pluncket was the last martyr at Tyburn, victim of the notorious Lord Shaftesbury and his chief perjured witness, Titus Oates, both of whom were subsequently thrown in jail.


text:
Monday, October 28th, 2013 Mill Valley Public LibraryCreekside Room7 PM (doors open at 6:45)The Art of Bulgari: La Dolce Vita & Beyond, 1950 -1990
A docent from the de Young Museum will give a presentation on the Bulgari exhibition of approximately 150 pieces created by the renowned Italian jeweler over four decades. This exclusive exhibition will highlight jewelry that defined a pivotal period in Italian design, and will include many pieces from the personal collection of Elizabeth Taylor. To help explore the cultural context in which these objects were made, the exhibition will include innovative uses of sketches, photographs, and other archival materials that help to reveal a fascinating intersection of celebrity, design, and fine craftsmanship.
© 2016 Mill Valley Public Library | 375 Throckmorton Ave | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | (415) 389-4292
Contact the Library | Privacy Policy & Disclaimer | Website developed by Vision Internet


text:
Hunt 1298: CWMU Buck deer
Season dates
9-1-2014 to 10-31-2014
The Wildlife Board establishes timeframes for hunting on CWMUs. Hunters should expect to hunt at least five days within these timeframes
- Nonresident permits: No
- Resident permits: 1
- Total permits: 1
Type: CWMU
Species: Buck deer
Weapon: Any legal weapon
DescriptionThe Wallsburg Cooperative Wildlife Management Unit (CWMU) is located east of Wallsburg, Utah. The higher elevations are on the east side of the Unit, ranging from 8900 feet in the south to 8400 feet in the north. Maple Creek or Maple Canyon cuts the Unit in the southwest, ranging from 6200 feet to 8400 feet. In the north Boomer Canyon cuts the Unit, ranging from 7000 feet to 8400 feet.
Near forty percent (40%) of the Wallsburg Cooperative Wildlife Management Unit (CWMU) is Rocky Mountain Aspen Forest and Woodland (22). This Aspen Forest and Woodland is all on the eastside of the unit. On the westside of the unit it is a mixture of Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe (62) and Rocky Mountain Gambel Oak-Mixed MontaneShrubland (41).
One of the Wallsburg Cooperative Wildlife Mangement Unit (CWMU) nearest weather stations, DEER CREEK DAM (422057), is 12.1 km west of the west edge of the CWMU. DEER CREEK DAM has forty-nine (49) years of records, 1959 - 2008. During the FALL (September, October and November) the average precipitation is 2.54 inches, but it can be as high as 7.69 inches or as low as 0.60 inch. During the 91-day FALL period, 15 days will experience greater than or equal to 0.01 inch of precipitation, 8 days of greater than or equal to 0.10 inch, or 1 day of the greater than or equal to 0.50 inch of precipitation. Snowfall during the FALL averages 4.4 inches but can be as high as 30.0 inches. FALL temperature at DEER CREEK DAM averages 46.0 degrees F. but can be as high as 97.0 degrees F. or as low as -12.0 degrees F. During the FALL, 54 days will be below freezing (32 degrees F.) and 1 day above 90 degrees F. This map is provided for general reference only and does not constitute a legal hunt boundary. The Division does not guarantee access to any private or public land. Hunt unit boundaries may include private property or other excluded areas.


text:
The Boy Scout Leader's Training Award and the Scoutmaster's Key are training awards that recognize training, tenure, and performance.
Complete a total of two years as a registered adult Boy Scout leader.
Do five of the following:
Complete three years of registered tenure as a Scoutmaster within a five-year period (can include the tenure used to earn the Scouter's Award).
At least twice during the three-year period, serve as Scoutmaster of a troop that earns the national Quality Unit Award.


text: My DD is 8 weeks old now and I've always had issues with her latch. Most of the time she has a shallow latch, but has always had good poopies and wet diapers, she is also putting weight on good. I've always had a OAL so she only nurses for about 10-15 minutes on one side. She is sleeping through the night now, but yesterday I noticed my nipples were getting sore and this morning when I woke up my nipples were bleeding plus they seem to be staying erect. Not sure what to do about this except I did not nurse this morning. I pumped and gave her a bottle. Any advice on what to do would be much appreciated. I'd really like to not have to give her too many bottles.


text:
FARMINGDALE - Police say they have arrested a Deer Park man for driving a school bus while drunk today in Farmingdale.
According to officials, Michael Asseng, 47, was driving a bus for ACME Bus Corporation with four young children when he hit a parked car on Midwood Avenue at around noon.
Police arrived at the scene and determined that Asseng was drunk and placed him under arrest.
Asseng is facing four counts of aggravated DWI, and driving while ability impaired.


text:
look i think we just need two playes right now to be a playoff team that either be felton or ridnour i pefer felton and bring another big like a kurt thomas and if t-mac is willing to come back for cheap them him to but look at this squad
t-mac/bill walker/azabokie/rautins
dont know who whould go best at c between randolph/turiaf/thomas
I'm confident. I wanted LeBron but it's over, and it'll be even sweeter when we knock off that 3-man-team in the spring.
Gallo is gonna shine. Randolph is gonna grow. I'm gonna miss David Lee but the trade as worth it. I'm kinda loving the Lee deal. He got paid, and the Knicks didn't have to pay for it, AND the Knicks got compensation.
And that's as is right now with no further free agent help. They still got about $13MM to spend. Maybe sign Ridnour for cheap as a backup. NO long-term commitments at the point, Donnie should just push hard for Parker a year from now.
Really gotta hand it to Donnie. Don't really know how much time he has left in the organization, seeing as these past few weeks is basically what he signed up for, but he did everything he set out to do. Got under the cap, and turned the Knicks into a franchise set up to win. I trust my franchise with Donnie Walsh.
Damn player-centric usernames straight to hell.
Great thread. I agree 100%, Metro is on point on this one.
Miami just traded Beasley to the Wolves to make room for The Queen's salary. They'll have Chalmers, Bosch, Wade, The Queen and a bunch of minimums. The rest of the association hates them so no one will be helping them build their team any time soon. Sorry to see D. Lee go, he was our warrior, but Golden State's hooking us up; he's their warrior now and I wish him all the success in the world. Anyway, not only would Miami be very beatable, they'd be a whole lot of fun to beat. Our future as a team is a lot brighter than the Heat's in my opinion. It will get really messy in Miami when the Wade-Queen honeymoon is over. Bosch? F%^$k Bosch!!! He's a bigger Queen than The Queen... He's got lowpostphobia. You better believe STAT is better then Bosch. Can't wait to see STAT do a Starks on them and dunk on their over-rated 3.
Metro - Nice post, it's coming together. After being crushed by Lebron, we need a little optimism around here. Donnie has some more money to spend so we can only get better.
I think we've got a playoff bound team, plus we've got cap room and a tradable Eddy Curry contract. The Knicks are definitely a more attractive option for any future free agents or trades.
I'm hoping all this Miami stuff is going to fuel some more Knicks/Heat rivalry and push us towards some excellent play against them.
Also, I hope this fiasco now puts an end to the whole cheering for other team's players at MSG.
Duncan is old and isn't better than Amare overall.
Gasol plays with Kobe, that doesnt make him better than Amare head to head.
Aldrige? You're a moron.
Dirk is not better than Amare. At shooting? Yes. Everything else, no.
Bosh is a gay version of Dirk, so you have to be a moron to believe he edges Amare.
You're just a sad hater man...this whole gimmick sucks and reading your post has been ****ing painful. You sound like someone who can't get over their ex. Just let the **** go and be a logical fan.
Same mentality?
Knicks just acquired 3 defensive caliber players with two shot blockers in Randolph and Turiaf and a Raja Bell clone in Azubuike. You're WRONG on that one cowboy.
The Knicks won 33 games because they were REBUILDING you dickface. Duhon was logging 37 minutes a game, what the hell you EXPECT?
Fire the coach? D'Antoni hasn't even had a chance yet, you need to sit your ass down and watch this team gel. D'Antoni is part of the rebuilding process. Firing the coach would just make us start over again and it'll take longer to rebuild.
Jim, you're a Bulls fan and the worst poster on the site...of course you're going to disapprove of this. You're upset because the Knicks didn't acquired MIDWEST losers like Isiah would of done? We have good pieces...go cheer for LeBron's punk midwest ass like you would do on the DL. You're the biggest disgrace on this site.
When was the last time the Knicks had an All NBA team player, All star caliber, top 3 big man? Patrick Ewing. If you don't think Amare won't make an impact in NY, then you're straight up BUGGIN' out.
Stop hating if you can't back it up with facts.
Amare has potential to play VERY good defense. Research his history.
That's the attitude. I love what Noah said last night, "We got Boozer. We are good. At least we'll be able to fight!"
The bottom line: The 2010 NYK team will be a much-improved team. Light years ahead of the 2008-2009 teams.
ORL-CHI-MIL-BOS-ATL will all be solid teams. Toss in MIA obviously. We are right there fighting for the 5-8 seed in the Eastern Conference. Bring it!
According to theknicksblog.com: Odom on Randolph
""It's like looking in the mirror a little. He's 6'11." He's left-handed, and he can put the ball on the floor. He's two times as athletic as I was at that age. If he stays focused, the sky is the limit for him."
NOW, in terms of beating the heat.... The blueprint should be taken from the 90s Knicks teams (even though it never really worked against MJ), and that is you attack MIA and it's two potent super-uber wing players with a tough, physical potent frontcourt!
MIA has BOSH and not much else down low. STAT, RANDOLPH, TURIAF, CURRY & JORDAN, on paper look like they'll massacre MIA in the paint.
That's a start. LJ & WADE will do their thing. But if Douglas can run circles around Chalmers, and Gallo hits the 3s.... If LJ/WADE are forced to hit jumpers and clank a few in the 4th.... We have a shot.
NOW, imagine if the Eddy Curry of a few years ago, the EC fighting for his next contract, imagine if he returns to 75percent of the offensive player he once was....
How does MIA stop the Knicks in the paint, when we could showcase STAT, RANDOLPH & CURRY dunking balls left and right? BOSH wont be able to do much against that.
Go bucket for bucket.
Just like the 90s, we'll be in the game and have our shot. Even if the outcome is the same, at least it'll be exciting (and at least we get a chanc ehopefully to avenge those tough Ewing defeats to MJ, even if in an odd sort of way).
Restore balance to the universe!
LET'S ALSO REMEMBER, we haven't finished rounding out the roster yet!
Sit back and watch the kids improve, watch STAT lead, hope we catch a break and avoid HEAT until the the EC Finals... And then, like NOAH said: GIve it our best shot and fight!
Miami who? The Knicks got a real team now. I sense some top free agents wanting to play for them next year.
im excited about our young team . and happy about stat
amare is more than a banger he is a leader something we desperate needed , some1 that knows the system already
amare was on the western conference , a tuff spot to be in if your a big man , now he comes to the eastern were he will bang
but a playoff team maybe ..
with some other few moves here and i say PLAYOFFS HELL YEAH
I hope Melo finds the whole Miami circle jerk classless and it drives him to want nothing more than to piss on their championship party plans.
Maybe the Nuggets come around eventually and we get him this season.


text:
Firm's Recall Hotline: (800) 601-8418CPSC Recall Hotline: (800) 638-2772CPSC Media Contact: (301) 504-7908Easy-Bake Media Contact: (401) 727-5318
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.
Name of Product: Easy-Bake Ovens
Units: About 1 million
Manufacturer: Easy-Bake, a division of Hasbro, Inc., of Pawtucket, R.I
Hazard: Young children can insert their hands into the oven's front opening, and get their hands or fingers caught, posing entrapment and burn hazards.
Incidents/Injuries: Since the repair program announced in February, Easy-Bake has received 249 reports of children getting their hands or fingers caught in the oven's opening, including 77 reports of burns, 16 of which were reported as second and third-degree burns. Easy-Bake also received one report of a serious burn that required a partial finger amputation to a 5-year-old girl.
Description: The Easy-Bake Oven is a purple and pink plastic oven that resembles a kitchen range with four burners on top and a front-loading oven. "Easy Bake" is printed on the front of the oven. Model number 65805 and "Hasbro" are stamped into the plastic on the back of the oven. This recall includes all units with the retrofit kit. The Easy-Bake Oven is an electric toy and is not recommended for children under eight years of age. Ovens sold before May 2006 are not included in this recall.
Sold at: Toys "R" Us, Wal-Mart, Target, KB Toys and other retailers nationwide from May 2006 through July 2007 for about $25.
Manufactured in: China
Remedy: Caregivers should immediately take the recalled Easy-Bake Oven away from children, and call Easy-Bake for instructions on how to return the toy oven for a voucher towards the purchase of another Hasbro product.
Consumer Contact: For additional information, contact Easy-Bake at (800) 601-8418 anytime, or visit the firm's Web site at www.easybake.com
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury or death associated with the use of
thousands of types of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries, and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the
nation more than $1 trillion annually. CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical or
mechanical hazard. CPSC's work to help ensure the safety of consumer products - such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters and household
chemicals -– contributed to a decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 40 years.
Federal law bars any person from selling products subject to a publicly-announced voluntary recall by a manufacturer or a mandatory recall ordered by the
To report a dangerous product or a product-related injury go online to www.SaferProducts.gov or call CPSC's Hotline at 800-638-2772 or teletypewriter at
301-595-7054 for the hearing impaired. Consumers can obtain news release and recall information at www.cpsc.gov, on Twitter @USCPSC or by subscribing
to CPSC's free e-mail newsletters.
Times: 8 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. ET; Messages can be left anytime
Call to get product safety and other agency information and to report unsafe products.
Please use the below phone number for all media requests.
Phone: (301) 504-7908
Spanish: (301) 504-7800
View CPSC contacts for specific areas of expertise
We are still interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are either directly related to this product recall or involve a different hazard with the same product.
Report a Product on SaferProducts.gov
The link you selected is for a destination outside of the Federal Government. CPSC does not control this external site or its privacy policy and cannot attest to the accuracy of the information it contains. You may wish to review the privacy policy of the external site as its information collection practices may differ from ours. Linking to this external site does not constitute an endorsement of the site or the information it contains by CPSC or any of its employees.
Click Ok if you wish to continue to the website; otherwise, click Cancel to return to our site.


text:
Movie Mondays - Kon-Tiki
Category: Movies
Location: Plaut Room
Join us for a screening of the Kon-Tiki on Monday, September 16, 2013 at 4:00 pm in the Plaut Room. Seating is limited to 25 and available on a first come, first served basis.
The dangers of the high seas have rarely been rendered as vivid and thrilling as in Kon-Tiki, the 2012 movie version of Thor Heyerdahl's famous and acclaimed autobiographical tale. Heyerdahl (Pål Hagen), an ethnographer and explorer convinced that the Polynesian islands were colonized by natives from South America, sets out to prove his thesis by sailing on a raft from Peru to the South Pacific. With five friends, some he's known for years and some he's recently met, he constructs his raft as it might have been made by Neolithic peoples, and sets off into the ocean. Kon-Tiki depicts the most dramatic moments of the expedition with lush and vivid cinematography, evocative sound, and compelling performances. Encounters with sharks and rough weather will stir up primal responses in viewers--the movie does a superb job of putting the audience on the boat (and in the water) with the sailors, nicely balancing narrative with gorgeous spectacle. Kon-Tiki is a satisfying reminder that, in this age of overblown intergalactic battles and crime stories, the basic conflicts of humans and nature can still seize the imagination.