text:
Talk:35 mm film
|35 mm film is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
|This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 17, 2007.
|Current status: Former featured article
|WikiProject Film
|(Rated C-class)
|To-do list for 35 mm film:
This seems to be a mistake: ""Sound-on-film" was soon adopted by the other Hollywood studios, resulting in an almost square image ratio of 0.860 in by 0.820 in.[36]". A mistake, as the height of a single frame is 19 mm = 0.748 in. So the height cannot be 0.820 in!
|Priority 3
- 1 Movie vs still film
- 2 Seattle Film Works
- 3 Differences in Movie and still film
- 4 Super 35
- 5 Using Anamorphic lenses... with Super 35?
- 6 History of film
- 7 First Kodak 35 mm color negative film
- 8 Academy Award for improved safety film
- 9 A little confused...
- 10 Widescreen
- 11 35mm film vs. HDTV
- 12 3-perf vs. scope
- 13 35 mm film - EXACTLY 16 frames per foot and EXACTLY 90 feet per minute ?
- 14 optical soundtrack
- 15 Super 35 and DI
- 16 duopoly, should that not be clarified?
- 18 CS perf
- 19 35 mm vs film in general
- 20 Competition from video?
- 21 Why 35mm? Why not 1 3/8"?
- 22 so-called "Souveneirng"
- 23 Removal from marketplace of Kodak's Kodachrome(r) Brand of Image Film
- 24 Proposal to remove date-autoformatting
- 25 Citation for "law" requiring use of safety film in 16 and 8mm
- 26 Can it be comparable with megapixels?
- 27 Dead link
- 28 Dead link 2
- 29 Aspect Ratios Image
- 30 Article scope
- 31 External links modified
Movie vs still film[edit]
What is the relationship between 35mm movie film and 35mm photo film? Are they the same? Well, other than both being about 35mm wide, no. Camera film doesn't generally have a sound track, for example. --LDC
- They are pretty much the same. 35mm movie film sometimes uses slightly differently shaped perforations to go through the projector better (I'll go into that after I find where I put my old textbooks), but the main difference is in the numbers and whatnot that are printed along the edges of the film: movie film has keykode, still film has frame numbers. But there's no substantive difference to their function; it is common for cinematographers to test out film stocks by buying motion picture film that has been cut and put into canisters, then shoot some test pictures with a still camera. The size of the frame and the presence or absence of the soundtracks is a matter of what's put onto the film when you use it, not an intrinsic difference. Brion VIBBER, Friday, March 29, 2002
The original Leica (the first 35mm camera) was build to use standard 35mm movie film packaged in a cartrige. The standard cartrige we still use now. Emulsion may differs magnetic track could be added for movie but that's the same film format. Ericd 00:25 Sep 7, 2002 (UCT)
- Movie film is exposed in the camera by passing the film behind the lens vertically in relation to the surface the camera is on, whereas still film passes horizontally behind the lens. In other words, the perforations of movie film are on the sides of the exposed frames, but the perfs on still film are on the top and bottom of the frames.Thomprod 13:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Isn't 135 just a reference to 35mm film being in a spooled light-trapped housing, then followed by a hyphen and estimated frame amount, based on the most likely still camera aspect ratio, the length of film will have? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 13:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Seattle Film Works[edit]
The chemical process is different. Seattle Film Works used to sell their own color film, that according to other photo processors it was film stock. They mentioned the shape of the perforations and the color of the film to recognize them.
- There used to be several firms that repackaged Motion picture film for still cameras. The Film is easy to recognize because it has rounded (bell and Howell Perfs) and black backing. The Motion picture film will totally mess up a process for regular still film (c-41)
- The film was identified by the Kodak 4 digit code number, such as 5293 (which was in use at the time)
- They switched to a private label c-41 film, but kept a four digit code to discourage other firms from processing the film.
- cmacd 15:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Differences in Movie and still film[edit]
I don't know exactily today what's in kodak eastman catalog but a few years ago colors films were different but the B & W were excatlly the same. This mainly IMHO due to the use of artificial light.(by the way motion picture use mainly negative film like most amateur photographer and not inversible film like in super 8). About the perforation it seems there is a super 35mm variant with different perforations. But in seems perforation in movie film could differ at differnet stages between the negative and the final copy to avoid geometrical distortions.
I found this about the subject but I did not read in extenso. http://www.kodak.de/US/en/motion/students/handbook/perforations1.jhtml Ericd 09:54 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)
Super 35[edit]
- My understanding of Super 35 is that a larger picture area is used, including the soundtrack area; this corresponds roughly with the picture area available in the silent area. For theatre distribution the top and bottom are cropped and the image is optically squished to standard anamorphic widescreen size, while for video & TV the exact picture size can be tailored scene-by-scene -- unlike conventional pan & scan, wide scenes can be preserved by zooming out and including that top and bottom space that was cropped out of the theater release. As far as I know there's nothing special with perforations, but I could be wrong. --Brion 22:38 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)
I don't know exactly how it's done but super 8, super 16, super 35 are always the same trick : a larger image with the same film width. For super 8 that's done with different perforations for super 16 and super 35 I don't know. Ericd 22:54 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)
Same trick: smaller perforations. Look at the end of film formats, I've put in a link to a site with over hundred movie formats - it is an truly excellent site.
I've made a 135 film page too, for photography. There is still a few sentences about photography in 35mm film - IMHO they should be moved to 135. I know the film medium is basically the same, but I would say a split with cross links is the best solution. A reader would normally be intested in either the photo or the movie side - and of course should be told about the connection User:Egil
Using Anamorphic lenses... with Super 35?[edit]
Why hasn't there been use of super 35 mm film with anamorphic lenses; this will take advantage of the left over negative space; and will be very competitive against standard 35mm with anamorphic lenses; the quality will no doubt be better (more negative space). Has this been considered; or, would it work at all? And why haven't anyone thought of combining the two?
- See Talk:Super 35 mm film Girolamo Savonarola 09:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
History of film[edit]
This topic is especially pertinent as I'm in progress on an article on the history of color film right now. I have some question about the attribution of "invention" to certain people. The sources that I have credit George Eastman for the creation of the clear nitrocellulose base film (or a nameless worker for Eastman). I understand that Hannibal Goodwin invented it in 1887 (based on one credible source PBS), but if there wasn't an early connection between Goodwin's invention and Eastman's - even though Goodwin won (or it was won in his name posthumously) the law suit for patent infringement - this doesn't say that Eastman didn't invent the same object. Unless Goodwin's nitrocellulose was used by Eastman (stolen, borrowed, given, inspired by - whatever), then it should be noted that it was an Eastman invention (simultaneous with Goodwin) as Eastman is the most notable influence on the motion picture industry. The same goes for Charles-Émile Reynaud, who is said to have invented the concept of perforated film - but if he did so in France and Eastman did the same thing in Rochester (unbeknownst to each other) than Eastman is still the inventor of perforated film for all intents and purposes with respect to the film industry (especially since this source biography states that Reynaud invented perforations the same year as Eastman (1889) (although this biography states 1892 - three years after Eastman/Edison). Unless a connection can be established between Eastman and these individuals - then the attribution for "invention of" should go to Eastman with mere afterthoughts that others invented the same item at nearly the same time. For instance, it is known that the Lumiere brothers saw Edison/Eastman's Kinetoscope and ran off to do their own experimenting and invented the projector - there's a direct connection there. I think we need to find a source that makes a connection between Eastman and Goodwin/Reynaud PRIOR to Eastman's "invention" of these two crucial elements to attribute the inventions to them; preferably a published resource, not a website (as I inherently distrust the Internet). LACameraman 01:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- If I may interfere: Look at the people as what they were and did. George Eastman was a bank clerk. He knew little about chemistry, physics or machine engineering. The first celluloïd roll films he sold was produced by Englishman George Alfred Blair in Kent, England. The invention of film is Goodwin´s property. Eastman bought so many things together like Edison, his mugger colleague, who also was a true ignorant in respect of physics. Eastman, for instance, bought the roll film and the roll film holder from Turner, an American camera maker, for $ 40´000. Don´t believe too much of what Eastman-Kodak marketing men try to spread. On the contrary, Dickson was a thoroughly trained technician, Edison´s house photographer. He, and no one else, devised a camera (Kinetograph), a printer (sprocket continuous drive), a viewer (Kinetoscope), and much more.
- Reynaud was on optician. His Praxinoscope dates from 1878. Father Lumière experienced it then at the world fair in Paris. One connection lies in Dickson. He spoke English and French. He travelled and met with Marey. Another lies with Le Prince. Le Prince spoke French, German, English at the minimum. Read the SMPTE Journal, August 1990, pages 652 through 661, John Belton: The Origins of 35mm Film as a Standard. --Filmtechniker 16:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this Blair bio would seem to indicate otherwise wrt Blair/Eastman. Eastman had created a roll film holder, paper-based roll film, and a camera well before Blair even was on his feet. Most of the early Dickson tests were with Carbutt or Eastman film. And I don't see that what one does to earn a living is necessarily directly correlative to their capacity to be scientifically innovative. Einstein was a patent clerk, Lavoisier was a tax collector. For that matter, how much does Steve Jobs or Bill Gates actually understand about the underlying code for their systems anymore? It's not really relevant - it is assumed that all corporations (or even labs) contain bosses and employees, idea men and technicians, etc. Sometimes these boundaries are less distinct than others. PhD-level university-funded biologists don't actually do the lab work today either. Synecdoche, if you will.... Girolamo Savonarola 17:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- My dearest friend, how true! You don´t see that what one does is necessarily correlative to your capacity: I write about a George Alfred Blair of England. You appear to try puzzling me with the name of Thomas Henry Blair, an American. That a Philosophiae Doctor not does the laboratory work today is, to my personal belief, a shame. Look at Einstein, wasn´t it his wife, Maleva, who countercomputed everything her husband had sketched ? She was by far the better mathematician than him. No wife, no "Einstein". And, contrary to Gates´ case, Dickson did his work alone. No lobbies, no secret organisation behind. --Filmtechniker 19:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this Blair bio would seem to indicate otherwise wrt Blair/Eastman. Eastman had created a roll film holder, paper-based roll film, and a camera well before Blair even was on his feet. Most of the early Dickson tests were with Carbutt or Eastman film. And I don't see that what one does to earn a living is necessarily directly correlative to their capacity to be scientifically innovative. Einstein was a patent clerk, Lavoisier was a tax collector. For that matter, how much does Steve Jobs or Bill Gates actually understand about the underlying code for their systems anymore? It's not really relevant - it is assumed that all corporations (or even labs) contain bosses and employees, idea men and technicians, etc. Sometimes these boundaries are less distinct than others. PhD-level university-funded biologists don't actually do the lab work today either. Synecdoche, if you will.... Girolamo Savonarola 17:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
35 mm film in television production[edit]
Changeing the subject a bit, 35mm film was used by the BBC as well as 16mm film in the 1960's for television programmes. As far as I know for Doctor Who, an episode of The Dominators is held on 35mm film as well as one episode of The War Games. But the BBC has chose to have duplicute copies on 16mm film which sujests in broadcasting terms 35mm film was not used as much or maybe not considered as important as 16mm Film. J2F Duck (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
On the use of 16 vs 35 mm. In America since the major studios began to finally consider TV as a viable market for Production product, they already had the entire infrastructure dedicated to 35mm assembly from top to bottom. Mitchell Cameras, 35 Dolly's Lighting, Cinematographers, editors, developing, budgeting... just no incentive to switch to the smaller, more touchy medium. But in terms of Resolution, 35mm is overkill on NTSC tv. Only 525 horizontal lines for vertical resolution... 35mm is charted at more than 2,000 lines in either direction. & 16mm is close to that. Also 16mm equipment is lighter & uses a smaller crew for location shooting. So for the smaller budgets of various BBC productions, & the acceptable image quality of the 16mm transfered to PAL, (Also enhanced by the fact that at 25 FPS British film could be transfered to 50 hertz PAL without needing a 2/3 pulldown- resulting in a cleaner transfer) The United Kingdom TV producers found cost savings in Shooting long scene interiors in multi camera PAL format- then switching to single camera film style shooting for exteriors. Unless the production was intended for USA release- (i.e. "The Prisoner" or "Avengers") then they would go 35mm all the way. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 01:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC) MBD 220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- What I am still waiting for is an article on 35 mm film in television production. At a minimum we should have some section somewhere to redirect it to. It is not helpful to link television shows to an article with a photo of 135 film cassette as the top image. We should also have a category for Television programmes shot on 35 mm film or something.
- The reason this is of general interest now is that anything produced using traditional television production methods with interleave absolutely sucks when shown on today's flat panel television sets. Television shows from the 1960s shot on 35 mm would however look absolutely stunning on HDTV and Blueray. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 07:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
First Kodak 35 mm color negative film[edit]
This Kodak website says, under the year 1950:
- EASTMAN Color Negative film, 5247. 35mm. Daylight, EI 16. First Kodak incorporated-color-coupler camera negative film. Replaced by 5248 in 1952.
Under the year 1952, it says:
- EASTMAN Color Negative film, 5248. Tungsten, El 25. Daylight, El 16. Speed increase and image structure improvement. Replaced 5247. -- Awarded OSCAR -- (25th Academy Year) Class I. Scientific or Technical Award. Replaced by 5250 in 1959.
— Walloon 19:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Walloon - thanks. I made that change in the article. The H-1 may be referring to the refined stock in 1952. LACameraman 23:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Academy Award for improved safety film[edit]
See Academy Awards given on 23 March 1950. — Walloon 08:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Walloon - the Academy Awards are always given in a year following their awarded year (as the period of elligibility is January to December, so the Awards must be presented in the next calendar year), however it is protocol to refer to the awards as having been given for the year the film/individual was elligible, NOT when they were actually presented. For instance, the Academy Awards that aired this past March (2006) were for achievements in 2005. Philip Seymour Hoffman won the Academy Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role in Capote. Although he was presented with the Oscar statue on March 5, 2006 the correct statement is: "Philip Seymour Hoffman was presented with an Academy Award for Best Actor in 2005" NOT 2006. All the best, LACameraman 07:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- That's exactly my point, that the year the award was given should not be confused with the eligibility year. For example, "In 2006, Philip Seymour Hoffman won the Academy Award for Best Actor of 2005." Note the all important prepositions: "in 2006/of 2005." The technical award given to Eastman Kodak for the improved safety film was given "in 1950". To say this technical award was given "in 1949" is not protocol, it's just incorrect. — Walloon 07:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Walloon - the year of an Academy Award, when correctly cited, is always referred to as the year of award (achievement), not the year of presentation, any other reference is incorrect. The Award is "won," "given," "received," "presented," in the year of achievement NOT in the year it was physically handed out. Here's just a two official examples:
- Al Mayer Sr. Oscar 2000 Please note how the award is listed - it was actually physically presented to Al Mayer Sr. on March 1, 2001. It is incorrect, however, to say that Al Mayer Sr. won an Academy Award in 2001.
- From Oscars.org: "In 1979, the Academy honored Young, Paul Kaufman and Frederick Schlyter from Du Art Laboratories with a Technical Achievement Award for the development of a computer-controlled paper tape programming system and its application in the motion picture laboratory." Official Oscar.org website Irwin Young was PRESENTED with the Oscar on April 11, 1980, yet the correct way to state this (unless for some reason you are specifically referring to an incident that happened on the night of the ceremony) is to say that Irwin Young won an Oscar in 1979. Please note the verbiage above is from the official Oscar website. To confirm the date of presentation, you can utilize your own source: [1] LACameraman 20:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Walloon - the year of an Academy Award, when correctly cited, is always referred to as the year of award (achievement), not the year of presentation, any other reference is incorrect. The Award is "won," "given," "received," "presented," in the year of achievement NOT in the year it was physically handed out. Here's just a two official examples:
A little confused...[edit]
I'm a little confused here. Now, I'm just getting into film, so I'm obviously a bit of a newbie. :) But I can't help but notice that the film quality for most hourlong dramas (The West Wing, Stargate: SG-1, Ally McBeal, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, etc.) is markedly different - with richer colors and darker blacks, for one, and what appears to be a higher definition - than the film for say, the average sitcom (like King of Queens, Reba, What I Like About You, Seinfeld, Friends, etc.). And film quality is sitcom level or worse for news programs, especially cheapo local news programs.
So, I gotta ask - does this mean that sitcoms and studio news are filmed in 16mm and hourlang dramas in 35mm, or what?
I ask not just because I'm interested (and because the page is confusing on the matter), but because I'm looking at requirements for a couple of film festivals I may want to eventually enter, and they require "16mm or 35mm" film, and I'm wondering if my to-be-shot-with-a-$700-digital-video-camera film will look crappier on 16mm or not. :P Runa27 08:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- You're confusing film and video (and videotape). Shows like the network news, your local news, game shows, daytime dramas, talk shows, and sports events are either live video or recorded videotape. All the other shows that you mentioned, both comedies and dramas, are shot on 35 mm film. What you perceive as the difference between the look of filmed shows such as The West Wing, and sitcoms such as King of Queens, both of which are photographed on 35 mm film, is actually in the lighting and camerawork. The West Wing is an example of a "single-camera" show, in which each shot is done as a separate set-up, after the lighting has been desgined for that particular camera angle and movement. King of Queens is an example of a "three-camera" show, which is filmed by three cameras simultaneously before a live audience in entire acts (not single shots). Because of this, the lighting can only be set once, and then not changed throughout the act, which compromises the artistic level of the lighting. The lighting for three-camera shows tends to be "high-key" to eliminate unwanted shadows, and allow the actors to be photographed evenly from whatever angle they move around the set. — Walloon 09:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
The widescreen is a little askew in the representation of the reasoning and placement of events that took place between the fall of 1952 when Cinerama premiered and the spring of 1954 when flat widescreen was uniformly accepted by all of the major studios for all of their films. The motivation for CinemaScope, 3-D (which played a large part during this time but isn't even mentioned in this article), Cinerama and flat widescreen was not to compete with each other at all (although CinemaScope and 3-D seemed to duke it out, but that's its own story).
The whole point of these "realism" formats was to draw people away from TELEVISION, not each other. CinemaScope was certainly not designed to be used by Fox only: they realized holding a monopoly on it would not help sell their own films.
Matted widescreen came out a full five months before animorphic did, but they were deveolped simultanously for the same goal. The Photoplayer 13:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Widescreen had been suggested many times before (witness the 1930s developments of large formats), but the studios passed on the idea due to perceived costs. While television certainly motivated, widescreen as a serious method was ignored until the massive success of the Cinerama format, which the studios had passed on. After that, widescreen was viewed as a legit improvement, and at that point exploited for use against television.
- While they didn't specifically compete against each other, they were all competing for the audience's attention, and hence market share. Fox specifically wanted to license its lenses out for exorbitant costs, and spent a great deal of time marketing its upcoming Cinemascope films from the moment they went into production. Fox also certainly wasn't going to let someone else debut "their" format. As there was less and less time to find an alternate and viable route for a similar widescreen solution to draw audiences, the matting solution was brought about quickly. That it was a last-minute effort is evidenced by the fact that the first films to use it were shot with the intention of being shown in 1.37, not matted. The success of Shane also helped to convince the non-Fox studios that matting would be accepted by audiences. Additionally, the rival studios certainly did not want to give additional money to Fox; along with their technical work, this was a large reason why Panavision was so readily successful among studios such as MGM - they were a non-studio third-party company. Girolamo Savonarola 16:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
35mm film vs. HDTV[edit]
I saw an interesting article on BBC about cinemas starting to use 1080p HDTV instead of 35mm film: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/5262456.stm
Maybe an idea to include a comparison between 35mm film and it's new digital counterpart? -- 184.108.40.206 12:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
The exhibition side of the film industry is now changing to digital projection, currently about 1/3rd of UK cinema screens have digital, rather than film, projectors. By 2013 the expectation is that over 75% of UK screens will be digital and that new releases will be increasingly offered as "digital only", no film prints being available. I understand that this rate of conversion is similar in other ""first-world" countries. The change-over is being driven by the film distributors, who stand to save a lot of money by cutting back on the cost of buying film prints.
Although in theory 35mm offers better resolution than 2K digital, in practice the difference is not evident in normal exhibition, and the new 4K digital projectors will wipe that out when they come on-stream. Dyed-in-the-wool film types like to claim that film has a 'certain something' that digital could never match, but ordinary film goers don't seem to be aware of it. Certainly 3D works better with digital, which is why the current resurgence of interest in 3D has come now, riding on the switch to digital projection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidlooser (talk • contribs) 12:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Davidlooser (talk) 12:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
3-perf vs. scope[edit]
The 3-perf section claims, "Most motion pictures today are shot and projected using the 4-perforation format, but cropping the top and bottom of the frames for an aspect ratio of 1.85 or 1.66." which seems to ignore the fact that many 4-perf films are in cinemascope. I don't know what fraction is (I thought it was about half?), but this text should probably be revised. Jhawkinson 08:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
35 mm film - EXACTLY 16 frames per foot and EXACTLY 90 feet per minute ?[edit]
It is commonly accepted within the industry (because, few people have actually done the math to verify this) that 35mm, 4 perf film is 16 frames per foot and runs at 90 feet per minute. The publications cited in this article even say that is the case. However, it isn't EXACTLY true.
Release perf pitch = 0.187 inches and There are 4 perfs per frame.
So, the length of 16 frames = .187 inches/perf x 4 perfs/frame x 16 frames = 11.968 inches
Running speed = (.187 inches/perf x 4 perfs/frame x 24 frames/second x 60 seconds/minute) /12 inches/foot = 89.76 feet/minute
Running time for a 1000 foot reel = (1000 feet/reel) / 89.76 feet/minute = 11.14 minutes = 11 minutes and 8.4 seconds
The difference isn't much and film footage counters are built to actually indicate 16 frames per foot. But, what they are really counting is integer blocks of 16 frames. Which makes the math easier when you are cutting a lot of film.
If you measured your 1000 foot reel of film using a standard film counter, instead of a standard measuring tape, it would only be 997.3 feet long and the play time would be a little less.
Clay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Please Be Bold and fix it. It's only in the Technical section that these are mentioned, right? That section could use a bit of reworking anyhow. On the other hand, we shouldn't lose the forest for the trees — 16frames/foot and 90feet/min are useful numbers for people to keep in mind, that they shouldn't be hidden, but instead the actual information should be available if you look hard enough. Remember that pitch will shrink some over time (a lot less with polyester than acetate!), projectors will run fast/slow, etc. 11.968" versus 12.000" is a 0.3% difference...it's unimportant for most people when you get down to the 4th and 5th significant figures. jhawkinson 12:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Are you sure that this isn't simply a byproduct of not having enough significant digits? Girolamo Savonarola 15:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The last sentence of the first paragraph on the page says "which makes for exactly 16 frames per foot.[3]". It was the use of "exactly" that caught my attention .I agree totally with jhawkinson's comment above. The industry uses 16 frames per foot, because it is really the integer number of frames that is important when you make a film cut, and as long as everyone agrees to call 16 frames 1 foot, everything just works. There really aren't many instances where you need to care about the absolute accuracy. But, I have run across a few.
The difference isn't in the number of significant digits used. Check the appropriate SMPTE spec. for film perf pitch.
Here is a link to a document "Motion Picture Film Basics", on Kodak's web site, that has a wealth of technical information on 35 mm and other film formats: http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/education/Film_Basics.pdf
Clay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.127.116.11 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC) (Please sign your posts by typing ~~~~—thanks!)
optical soundtrack[edit]
Suddenly the soundtrack segment of Fantasia makes a lot more sense. Gazpacho 07:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Super 35 and DI[edit]
The section on the effects of DI is unclear to a lay person. Will Super 35 become obsoltete?
- The DI is actually more likely to continue increasing the possibility of Super 35, since it makes an optical conversion in the intermediate stage obsolete. Each have their weaknesses, but DI is generally considered to be the better of the two if done at a high quality resolution such as 4K or higher. That being said, films shooting on anamorphic or Academy 1.85 have the advantage of being able to retain a purely contact printing-based workflow to release print, which tends to both be cheapest and highest-quality. So Academy-width is unlikely to die out. However, DI makes less-conventional formats easier to convert to projection standards. Girolamo Savonarola 11:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
duopoly, should that not be clarified?[edit]
Agfa-Grevert, still makes 35mm Print film (and sound recording film) although they gave up on Camera negative, and in fact all film on Acetate base. Only Kodak and Fuji make colour Negative anymore. I think that ORWO at least advertises 35mm B&W negative.cmacd 12:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- As Wikipedia itself notes, In reality, this definition is generally used where two firms must only have dominant control over a market. I can't think of any recent films printed to Agfa, and Orwo, Foma, et al are generally not greatly used or easily accessible throughout most of the globe. Few would contest the fact that Kodak and Fuji are the only two companies with substantial market share at the moment. Girolamo Savonarola 12:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
The article is a credit to Wikipedia, but I've seen a small error - the usable area of super 35 film is correct in millimetres, but totally wrong in square inches - not 9+ sq inches, more like 0.4 of a sq inch, if someone could do the necessary calculations....22.214.171.124 22:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Good spot. I've had a look at the articles history and it's been there a while. I guess everyone is thinking metric these days. Many thanks. Megapixie 22:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
CS perf[edit]
Conversation moved to Talk:Film perforations.
35 mm vs film in general[edit]
A lot of this article applies to all film formats, not specifically 35 mm. Should those sections be cut and/or moved to other appropriate articles? Zocky | picture popups 01:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Competition from video?[edit]
I am a bit surprised to read that 35 mm is very common and the article suggests by omission that it suffers no competition from e.g. Television cameras for movies. Is this true? The article independent_film suggests otherwise. I would appreciate some expansion on (lack of) competition with digital formats. Andries 07:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Studios Shift to Digital Movies, but Not Without Resistance by SCOTT KIRSNER July 24, 2006 New York Times Andries 07:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Why 35mm? Why not 1 3/8"?[edit]
Great article, and a credit to Wikipedia. But one thing's puzzling me. It seems fairly clear that, being American, Dickson and Eastman would have measured and referred to their film stock as 1 3/8" rather than 35mm. So how and why did the standard become known as 35mm? Does anybody know? It seems to me that this nugget of information would be a relevant addition to the article, if anybody could unearth it... Stewart Robertson 10:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
There is nothing mysterious to "unearth". Metric System is the universal scientific measurement method and much more accurate that any local old middle ages mumble jumble. So, for something to be comprehended internationally –and scientifically- has to be expressed with Metric System.--22.214.171.124 (talk) 04:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
George Eastman, like Alexander Graham Bell and others loathed US customary measures and didn't use them. Eastman wanted his film to be 35 mm and 35 mm it really is. The 1 3/8 is a fiction initiated by metric haters who think if they tell a lie often enough and others believe it, then it must be true. Just because something originates in the US doesn't mean the developers used obsolete units of measure. Many to this day use metric behind the scenes and keep it hidden from the Luddites.
so-called "Souveneirng"[edit]
In these revisions User:JzG added this text:
- == Souveniring == The 35mm format is compatible with domestic slide projectors. Frames removed from the film can be shown on projectors, and the absence of one frame, in a film which runs at 24 frames per second, is barely perceptible, though removal of souvenir frames is unlawful.<ref>[http://www.shocktreatmentnetwork.com/merchandise.htm Example] discussion for the movie ''[[Shock Treatment]]''</ref> Sometimes souvenir frames are claimed to be the result of sections cut from the film in order to repair a break; this may not be accurate as tears can and should be repaired and a complete intact frame should in any case not be removed as part of a repair. The practice of souveniring has declined with the increasing prevalence of [[Anamorphic]] formats.
I reverted it with this es: "rv. "Souveneiring" is not a standard term, it *IS* perceptable, should not be promoted, single frames SHOULD be removed when damage affects picture; &mere discussion of this promotes unprofessionalism"
- OK, do you dispute that souveniring happens? That it is a problem? That a frame undamaged enough to function as a slide should not be taken out? I typically repaired rips in prints, but actually I rarely if ever had them because I always repared any broken sprocket holes first :-) Guy (Help!) 20:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- I have several issues; I'll address your questions first and then move on
- I dispute that there is any significance incidence of "souveneiring." I'm aware that people sell "cells" on EBay, but I project a large amount of second-run prints and I've essentially never run into a case of this. I think those cells on EBay are generally from trailers.
- It would certainly be a problem if it happened. But so would all kinds of vandalism to all kinds of property; for instance we do not have a Vandalism section in Western painting.
- Generally speaking, if a frame has visible damage in the picture area, it is best to remove it. Of course, it depends on how much damage there is. I think this is generally speaking the industry concensus, but reasonable projectionists do disagree on this, and the question is very similar to that of whether to remove lab splices. My recollection from the last time it was discussed on Film-Tech was it was about 5:1 in favor of removing them.
- The very presence of this section will have a negative impact. People who never thought of doing this may think of it, and it lends credence to a terrible terrible idea that is not actually a problem right now. But putting it in here may cause it to become a problem. To put it in wikipedia-speak, it is not currently a "notable" phenomenon. This is my concern about professionalism.
- I have several issues with your wording. I don't think it is reasonable to say it is "compatible." yes, you can stick a 4-perf 35mm frame into an 8-perf slide mount. But it leaves a lot of empty space and it's kind of like saying that it is "compatible" with medium-format. Yes, it is "smaller."
- I dispute that the absence of one frame is "barely perceptible." That's a judgment, and not one I think Wikipedia should be making. For one thing, it produces a sound glitch (of varying severity depending on the splice, on the digital sound format, if any) and a picture glitch (splices are visible on-screen, generally the tape boundaries, the focus shift, and perhaps the gate-jump). Furthermore, 42ms is indeed perceptible. Not extremely, but I would say more than "barely" (this does depend on who is watching).
- I don't really know what people who ostensibly market these things claim, and I'm don't think it belongs in an encyclopedia (in re "claimed to be the result of sections cut from the film")
- The statement about whether an intact frame should be removed as part of a repair has no place here. It's a value judgment, and one that I think is unambiguously incorrect for all cases. You can argue there are plenty of cases where it is correct to leave the frame or to remove it, but I don't think you'll find many who think there is a blanket rule one way or another.
- Increased prevalence of anamorphic formats? I don't think we're currently seeing a rise in scope movies.
- Declined? I don't think we have any evidence at all on the prevalence of this supposed practice.
- I don't think your reference is appropriately canonical.
- I have several issues; I'll address your questions first and then move on
So, I think the text you have proposed is not very good, and I don't support having any text about this in there at all. But if there has to be something (and I think it is wrong!) it should be correct and verifiable. So, again, I'm going to revert this. jhawkinson (talk) 01:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- When I was a projectionist, most of the big name films we got in US wide and other non-anamorphic formats had souvenir frames missing; anamorphic prints are horizontally compressed if shown without the right lens, so look odd (and showing an academy ratio print through a scope anamorph is also amusing). The print we got of Kelly's Heroes ran nearly seven minutes short, and a lot of that was souveniring. It's much more common once the print goes on distribution to clubs and societies, though. 1/24s of missing film is not generally perceptible, in my experience. I reviewed a number of sites discussing film restoration, it seems to be the case that repair is still preferred over removal of a frame. The longest tear I repaired spanned 12 frames, the film arrived broken (very unusual). Guy (Help!) 09:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- How do you know they were souvenir frames missing, rather than lab splices or severe runs of damaged film? There is sadly lots of opportunity for 1970s-era titles to have been damaged (even seen a takeup fail and see film get wrapped around the lower constant-speed sprocket in the soundhead, filling up the cabinet?). But in any case, Wikipedia is Not For Original Research. As I said, repair versus removal is somewhat of a judgment call in each case, but an absolute statement isn't warranted (I really don't think that you're going to find people advocating leaving white horizonal "lightning bolts" in...). If you could substantiate it from an authoritative source... I know what anamorphic movies are, but I've never heard it claimed they have more missing footage than flat films. But in any case, my overarching point is the one numbered (4) above: this practice is not "notable" or of significant incidence, and noting specific ways that vandalism can happen only encourages that sort of vandalism. jhawkinson (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- When I was a projectionist, most of the big name films we got in US wide and other non-anamorphic formats had souvenir frames missing; anamorphic prints are horizontally compressed if shown without the right lens, so look odd (and showing an academy ratio print through a scope anamorph is also amusing). The print we got of Kelly's Heroes ran nearly seven minutes short, and a lot of that was souveniring. It's much more common once the print goes on distribution to clubs and societies, though. 1/24s of missing film is not generally perceptible, in my experience. I reviewed a number of sites discussing film restoration, it seems to be the case that repair is still preferred over removal of a frame. The longest tear I repaired spanned 12 frames, the film arrived broken (very unusual). Guy (Help!) 09:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have to agree with most of Jhawkinson's points. The article is about the general development and specifications of the film format, not possible outside applications not pertinent to the format itself. (Ie, there's nothing about the practice which suggests it wouldn't also have occurred in 16mm prints, amongst others.) Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Removal from marketplace of Kodak's Kodachrome(r) Brand of Image Film[edit]
On June 22, 2009 the Kodak Corp announced that it was retiring the Kodachrome manufacturing process. [see link here] http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2709&gpcid=0900688a80b4e692&ignoreLocale=true&pq-locale=en_US&_requestid=5096
So with this I researched the differences that would be missing, and found the article (Main) had the descriptive about the 3 layers of filtered emulsion, that would comprize the other types of film. To this articleI have added the Exception, as I see that Kodachrome, was not the same type of film, and should be noted as such.TerrificInTahoma (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC).
- However, I'm pretty sure this announcement referred to 35mm still photography film. 16mm Kodachrome has been off the market for some years now, and 35mm Kodachrome for motion picture used was abandoned decades ago. The Photoplayer 20:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposal to remove date-autoformatting[edit]
Dear fellow contributors
MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes rules for the raw formatting, irrespective of whether a date is autoformatted or not). MOSLINK and CONTEXT are consistent with this.
There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here:
- (1) In-house only
- (a) It works only for the WP "elite".
- (b) To our readers out there, it displays all-too-common inconsistencies in raw formatting in bright-blue underlined text, yet conceals them from WPians who are logged in and have chosen preferences.
- (c) It causes visitors to query why dates are bright-blue and underlined.
- (2) Avoids what are merely trivial differences
- (a) It is trivial whether the order is day–month or month–day. It is more trivial than color/colour and realise/realize, yet our consistency-within-article policy on spelling (WP:ENGVAR) has worked very well. English-speakers readily recognise both date formats; all dates after our signatures are international, and no one objects.
- (3) Colour-clutter: the bright-blue underlining of all dates
- (a) It dilutes the impact of high-value links.
- (b) It makes the text slightly harder to read.
- (c) It doesn't improve the appearance of the page.
- (4) Typos and misunderstood coding
- (a) There's a disappointing error-rate in keying in the auto-function; not bracketing the year, and enclosing the whole date in one set of brackets, are examples.
- (b) Once autoformatting is removed, mixtures of US and international formats are revealed in display mode, where they are much easier for WPians to pick up than in edit mode; so is the use of the wrong format in country-related articles.
- (c) Many WPians don't understand date-autoformatting—in particular, how if differs from ordinary linking; often it's applied simply because it's part of the furniture.
- (5) Edit-mode clutter
- (a) It's more work to enter an autoformatted date, and it doesn't make the edit-mode text any easier to read for subsequent editors.
- (6) Limited application
- (a) It's incompatible with date ranges ("January 3–9, 1998", or "3–9 January 1998", and "February–April 2006") and slashed dates ("the night of May 21/22", or "... 21/22 May").
- (b) By policy, we avoid date autoformatting in such places as quotations; the removal of autoformatting avoids this inconsistency.
Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. Does anyone object if I remove it from the main text (using a script) in a few days' time on a trial basis? The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just the huge number of visitors; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which would give greater prominence to the high-value links. Tony (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Citation for "law" requiring use of safety film in 16 and 8mm[edit]
This is a great article. One line struck me though, in "Amateur Interest": " By law, both 16 mm and 8 mm gauge stock (as well as 35 mm films intended for non-theatrical use) had to be manufactured on safety stock." My question is, What law, when? In one country? Initially, back in the early 20's when Kodak introduced safety film for 16 mm, this was initiated by Kodak, as far as I've ever read, it was not initiated by any governmental action. Later, in the safety film section, there is no mention of any legislation or governmental regulations about safety film for 8 and 16 mm. 8 and 16 mm were always safety films, but that wasn't caused by legislation. I think this should be sourced and cited. But I don't want to change the entry, as I don't know for sure if there was a law covering this or not. StevenBradford (talk) 19:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this needs better citation. Additionally, this may need some clarification. A quick online search shows a few links that provide circumstantial indications
- This is all in a modern context, however, mainly relating to storage and projection. There were other laws that can be cited, such as the London Underground prohibiting all transport of motion picture film well into the 1950s. As for amateur films, this may require more research, possibly offline by someone with better access to historical legal codes. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, here is a better link, although it doesn't cite its own claim, nor is it an academic paper, despite the Stanford provenance. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Can it be comparable with megapixels?[edit]
Can 35 mm film be comparable with mega-pixels? there is a myth going about people say it has infinite resolution. But I believe it cant be more than 10-20 mp ? --126.96.36.199 (talk) 12:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link[edit]
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.jkor.com/peter/perfs.html
- In Film perforations on 2011-03-19 06:20:22, 404 Not Found
- In 35 mm film on 2011-06-19 06:49:55, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 06:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 2[edit]
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.cinetech.com/html/stocktimeline.html
- In Film stock on 2011-03-19 06:20:43, 404 Not Found
- In 35 mm film on 2011-06-19 06:50:06, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 06:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Aspect Ratios Image[edit]
The picture comparing aspect ratios needs to be updated.
Cinemascope should be replaced with anamorphic. Cinemascope is a proprietary (and now defunct) process of 20th Century Fox. Anamorphic is the technical term used to describe all anamorphic processes. The aspect ratio should also be updated from 2.39:1 to the more accurate 2.35:1.
Also, the 4:3 television image area should be removed from all examples. It was more common to crop the sides of a widescreen frame off when displaying widescreen images on a 4:3 television than show areas outside the widescreen frame. Because of this, the area of the widescreen frame shown could be taken anywhere from the original widescreen image, not just the center of it. This was a process called pan and scan. Further, it's simply unnecessary to show 4:3 television frames at all, as the article is talking about film aspect ratios.
I would do this myself, but I'm not certain how to do so. If someone can direct me to instructions on how to do this, I'll gladly do it myself or someone who already knows how to do this can feel free to make the changes. Thanks. Filmnuts (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Article scope[edit]
As just a lay reader, I find the scope of this article, and the article on 35 mm still film, to be deeply confusing, and it does not address the subject named in the title. I expect this issue is being worked on, since it seems to be the only non-crossed-out item in the list of to-do items, at top.
The two problems as they stand are: One, an article titled "35 mm film" ought to be about just that. Instead, it is limited to 35 mm motion picture film, and of course it is profoundly technical. It's as if an article on the Civil War dealt only with the Confederacy or with the United States, not both; and furthermore delved into, say, battleship designs.
Two, to make matters worse, the article on 35 mm still-photography film has the converse problem--it ought to be called by the phrase I just used; instead it's titled "135 film", namely, it's apparently limited to Kodak's subset of the 35 mm film world. It's as if an article about the entire Confederacy were titled, say, "Secession". It ought to be called, and its scope ought to be, "35 mm still-photography film."
I came to the present article simply to read about and understand the important milestones of all 35 mm film--motion-picture and still. I find it unreasonable that I can't read that overview in one article. I was utterly dumbfounded, for example, to find an article having the title "35 mm film" never even mentions Kodachrome.
Moreover, this article mixes history and description--and even prescription, what with the plethora of format specifications. The person wishing to read about the overall history of 35 mm film most definitely does not want to be told about detailed data on sprocket holes.
Hence, you should offload the vastly detailed motion-picture content--by all means keeping all that detail--to another article.
So as I see it, you need three articles: "35 mm film," "35 mm motion-picture film," and "35 mm still-photography film." The current article titled "135 film" can also remain, if you wish to treat Kodak's 35 mm products as a separate topic.
As I said, I suspect this issue's being worked on.
Jimlue (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 35 mm film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add
{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131009110151/http://www.subclub.org:80/shop/halframe.htm to http://www.subclub.org/shop/halframe.htm
Archived sources have been checked to be working
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120112001815/http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Products/Chronology_Of_Film/chrono2.htm to http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Products/Chronology_Of_Film/chrono2.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110226171133/http://www.nfsa.afc.gov.au:80/preservation/audiovisual_terms/ to http://www.nfsa.afc.gov.au/preservation/audiovisual_terms/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Archived sources have been checked but failed to be useful/working
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Filmmaking articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Filmmaking articles needing attention to supporting materials
- WikiProject Film articles
- Film articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Film articles needing attention to supporting materials
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists


text:
THE LIST Bevy of Shawn Levy
1 "A Night at the Museum" (2006). After directing two hits with Steve Martin ("Cheaper By the Dozen," "Pink Panther"), Shawn Levy had a blockbuster with "Night at the Museum." Ben Stiller starred as a night watchman in a museum where exhibits, including dinosaurs, come to life after closing time. A sequel followed; "III" arrives in 2014.
2 "Date Night" (2010). Levy directs a mistaken-identity comedy with Steve Carell and Tina Fey. This has its moments, like the strip-dance sequence, and Carell is particularly good. Still, it could be funnier, considering the supporting cast on hand -- Mark Wahlberg, Common,Taraji P. Henson, Kristen Wiig, Mila Kunis, James Franco.
3 "Real Steel" (2011). Who knew Levy could do clanging metal so well? It helped, of course, to have Hugh Jackman along for the ride in this ridiculous, yet entertaining "Rocky"-styled, futuristic tale about robot boxing.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Friday, May 9, 2014
After noticing a tattered American flag on one of the shrimp boats, a group of Mount Pleasant women offered to purchase new flags for each shrimp boat in time for the Blessing of the Fleet festival.
Arrangements were made with captain Mark Richardson to coordinate with the other shrimp boat captains, and Bob Boyles, of American Flagpoles and Flags, offered a discount for these South Carolina-made flags. Boy Scout Troop 40 presented the flags to David Richardson and Rocky Magwood at a gathering at Shem Creek on Tuesday, April 22. The scouts also took the old flags to dispose of during a special scout ceremony. Richardson and Magwood have graciously offered to take the boys shrimping this June.
© 2016 Moultrie News an Evening Post Industries company. All Rights Reserved.
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Parental Consent Form.


text:
Family Practitioner, Primary Care Doctor
36 years of experience
36 years of experience
Apache Wells
7721 E Wolf Canyon St
Mesa, AZ 85207 Phone number & directions
7721 E Wolf Canyon St
Mesa, AZ 85207 Phone number & directions
License & Identifications
A medical license is required for a doctor to practice medicine in a particular state. Requirements vary by state but most require, at a minimum, post-graduate training in the doctor's specific specialty. An NPI number is a national identifier unique to an individual health care provider and is managed by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Learn more about Dr. Ann Robb:
View the full profile to get information on:
- Qualifications
- What's important to you
View full profile
Patient Reviews
Have you visited Dr. Robb? Share your experience.
Write a Review
Write a Review
Prepare before visiting Dr. Robb
Smoking Cessation Patient Education Smoking cessation patient education guide to help you quit smoking and avoid cancer and other health related problems.Before Visiting Dr. Robb Learn More
Specialties & Research
- She has special expertise in 1 area:
- Acupuncture
Education & Awards
Dr. Robb graduated from University of Arizona, Tucson.
Home > Find a Family Doctor > AZ > Mesa Family Physicians > Dr. Ann Robb, DABMA, MD
Similar doctors nearby
Dr. Donald Pont
Family Medicine
42 years experience
Mesa, AZ
Dr. Carl Ferguson
Family Medicine
30 years experience
Mesa, AZ
Dr. Kenneth Osorio
17 years experience
Mesa, AZ
Dr. Connie Catron
Family Medicine
25 years experience
Mesa, AZ
Dr. William Gerchick
Family Medicine
Mesa, AZ
Dr. Jared Dayton
Family Medicine
12 years experience
Mesa, AZ
- Additional Information
- Dr. Ann Therese Robb DABMA and MD is a female Family Practitioner, has 36 years of experience and practices in Family Medicine.
- Where does Dr. Ann T. Robb practice?
- Dr. Ann Robb has 1 office location.
Dr. Ann Robb practices Family Medicine near Mesa, AZ.
See Mesa Family Physicians.


text:
i'll sacrifice myself in this thread if it'll bring back tommy <3
5/22 - The Cure - Hollywood Bowl
5/31 - Brian Jonestown Massacre - Teragram (?)
6/07 - Chelsea Wolfe - Teragram (?)
6/14 - Silver Apples - Troubadour
6/16 - John Carpenter - Orpheum
last.fm, if you care
Twitter, if you dare
Bust 'em out ladies.
I post too much. A banning would be good for me. New Year's Day!
wow this thread has soo much potential.
Let it go, dude. You post absolutely moronic things and you will get made fun of for doing so. It's a fucking pity you are really stupid enough to not catch the patently blatant sarcasm present in nearly every post I've made that concerns you. Did Obama turn this country into an internet laden with soft fucking pussyboys who not only can't take a joke, but can't even articulate one with any sort of ingenuity or wit? Is this what Obamacare has done to us?
9/21: Khruangbin @ The Independent
9/22: Moon Duo, Cold Beat @ The New Parish
9/24: Dolly Parton @ Shoreline
9/30: Omar-S @ TBA
10/9: Midland, Erika @ The Midway
10/14: Margo Price @ GAMH
10/15: Cymbals Eat Guitars @ Shea Stadium BK
10/16: Anthony Naples, Justin Carter @ Nowadays
10/21: Screaming Females @ The Night Light
10/25: Hiss Golden Messenger @ The Independent
09/28: Nicolas Jaar @ Taub
11/16: Neko Case @ The Fox Theater Oakland
what she said.
But if we ALL post our pictures here, there is no way Dani will ban us all.
Goldroom 11/10
Coachella 2017
^You are thinking of fucking with one of the primordial forces of nature. i'm getting a chill up my spine thinking about it.
Mike gets it.
So serious
You wanna fook on me?!
When it comes to the friend with mental powers that can blow up my aorta, i am always serious:
You know, originalbob did not get banned for posting her boobs. I think you not only have to post your nude parts; you have to taunt PF about it.
the busy bee has no time for sorrow.
Well then the haters will flag out of jealousy.
I was totally kidding with my statement towards Amy. No matter how much you hate me I hope you keep watching. No ignore. Class clowns are dying for attention. Feed the beast.
You wanna fook on me?!
He is not amused
You wanna fook on me?!
I wish Serious Cat was MY cat.
8/7/16 - Sufjan Stevens @ Hollywood Bowl // 8/8/16 - Radiohead @ Shrine // 8/8/16 - Boris @ Regent
9/14/16 - Wilco @ Theatre at Ace Hotel // 9/18/16 - Kraftwerk @ Hollywood Bowl
In three days...


text:
old scripts new disposal methods
Maybe they're sitting in your highest kitchen cabinet, collecting dust. Or maybe they're hiding out behind the bathroom mirror, untouched for months -- or even years.
Wherever they are, you know you have to do something about them: Those expired or unneeded medicines hiding in your home can be poisonous if left alone.
Jeff DeBello, of UPMC Hamot, recognizes that people are confused about what to do with meds that generations of people flushed down the drain or tossed in the trash. That's a no-no.
DeBello is Hamot's facilities engineering manager and oversees proper disposal of pharmaceuticals at the hospital. "While other medical waste can be handled through chemical treatment or sanitized in an autoclave," he says, "the compounds in prescription medicines classify them as hazardous waste. The FDA indicates that the safest way to dispose of such waste is by burning it in a properly supervised, high-temperature incinerator in excess of 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit."
Flushing them pollutes the water supply. Throwing them in the trash is also harmful to the environment.
Many of us remember when it was acceptable to toss unwanted meds down the drain. But studies indicate that most wastewater treatment systems are designed to remove bacteria, not pharmaceuticals, from the water.
Anna McCartney, communications and education specialist with Pennsylvania SeaGrant, noted that proper disposal affects all of us. Medicines flushed down the toilet end up in the water supply.
Though some guidelines recommend disposing of medicines by mixing them with coffee grounds or cat litter and throwing them in the trash, even medicine thrown away in sealed containers can have an effect on water runoff from landfills, McCartney explains.
"If we saw what we were doing, we'd probably think twice about putting it in the trash or flushing it down the toilet," she says.
The Associated Press reported in 2008 that the drinking water of 51 million people in the U.S. contained residues from pharmaceuticals, which could lead to antibiotic resistance.
The potent chemicals from flushed pharmaceuticals can't be seen with the naked eye, but they accumulate in the water supply and harm aquatic life. Chemicals from many medicines act as endocrine disrupters -- substances that interfere with hormone development in wildlife and in humans. U.S. Geological Survey researchers have documented fish with both male and female characteristics in the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers, likely from the effect of endocrine disrupters in the water.
Although there is no conclusive evidence harm from pharmaceuticals in the water supply, no human studies have been done on long-term effects. McCartney notes that pharmaceuticals are powerful chemicals that are made to work in small doses, and drinking traces of these substances over time could have negative consequences -- particularly for babies and small children, who are vulnerable even to slight changes in hormones.
"If you're sick, it's supposed to make you healthy," McCartney says. "But at some point, you have to start thinking about the environmental health and the health of people."
Ray Moluski, vice president of general services at UPMC Hamot, says doctors are now writing prescriptions for 10 days if a 30-day amount is unnecessary.
What to do
Kim Burns, associate professor at the LECOM School of Pharmacy, said the Pennsylvania SeaGrant has been working with local medical professionals since April 2008 to organize community prescription take-back events.
At the most recent collection event at UPMC Hamot in April 2012, pharmacy students from LECOM cataloged more than 270 pounds of unwanted medication turned in by Erie residents -- more than any of the other UPMC hospitals who participated in the event on the same day.
After the medicines are collected, officials from the Department of Justice transport the waste to an approved high-temperature incineration facility.
LECOM typically signs on for three or four collection events per year, Burns says, and participation at community collection events has increased since they started.
"I think more people are understanding the dangers and the risks of not disposing of medication," she says.
Although other states allow patients to turn in unwanted medicines to pharmacies, doctor's offices or even through the mail, Pennsylvania state law mandates law enforcement be in charge because they are controlled substances. And public events and drop-off points are increasing.
The Erie County Department of Health helped start a permanent drop-off box at the Corry police station, 20 E. South St., starting in July. People can drop off their medications anytime from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on weekdays, or after hours by appointment.
The next Erie collection event, a local offshoot of the national Drug Enforcement Administration National Take-Back Initiative, will take place at various local police stations and community centers on Sept. 29. LEL


text:
These stocks rising on unusual volume are within range of triggering breakout trades.
These heavily shorted stocks could get squeezed much higher if they report positive earnings this week.
TheStreet highlights 3 stocks that pushed the Chemicals industry
Microsemi Corp., Dixie Group and Landec are three top picks investors should keep an eye on this year, according to Bill Hench, portfolio manager for the Royce Opportunity Fund.


text:
The ISEA International foundation board is the governing body of ISEA. The primary role of the Board is to oversee the continuation of the annual symposia, build and maintain a comprehensive symposium archive. The Board meets monthly via Skype and holds its Annual General Meeting (AGM) at each symposium, where it updates the public on its activities and invites organisations bidding for future symposia to present their proposals.
Board Members:
Ian Clothier (based in Aotearoa New Zealand),
Ian Clothier is an electronic artist, curator, Executive Director of Intercreate.org, co-founder of biennial residency SCANZ, and Senior Academic at Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki. Internationally recognised for working cross culturally in the context of the environment, his projects have been selected for exhibition at five ISEA. Currently involved in live connection to plants and environments, his research is focused on integrated systems, cultural hybridity and nonlinearity.
Peter Anders (based in Midland, MI, USA),
Peter Anders is an architect, educator, and information design theorist. He has published widely on the architecture of cyberspace and is the author of "Envisioning Cyberspace" which presents design principles for on-line spatial environments. The book was published by McGraw Hill in 1998.
Wim van der Plas (based in Rotterdam, the Netherlands)
Wim van der Plas is a sociologist interested in the relationship between science and art, or, on a more practical level, between technology & culture. Until retiring in 2011, he was a project manager and professor at the Utrecht University of Applied Sciences. He also worked for the Groningen and Utrecht Art Schools and the Foundation for Creative Computer Applications (SCCA). He is one of the two founders of ISEA and organised the 1st, 2nd and 7th International Symposium on Electronic Art. He was head of ISEA Headquarters before becoming an ISEA board member.
Bonnie Mitchell (based in Bowling Green Ohio, USA)
Bonnie Mitchell is a Digital Arts Professor at Bowling Green State University and president of CreativeMyndz Multimedia Studios. Her research focuses on the intersection of art, music, psychology, and geology. She is internationally recognized for her immersive interactive animated installations and early Internet art. Her work has been exhibited at ISEA, SIGGRAPH, Ars Electronica, Punta y Raya, and more. She has also curated a number of international exhibitions including SIGGRAPH 2006 and GRAPHITE.


text:
Every year we bring you 120+ speakers covering a wide range of topics that touch every area of your family's life. Here is a sample of our exciting speaker roster for 2013. This list is still under construction; many more will follow -- so stay tuned!
Julianne Adams, DSH-P, BCIH, NST-CP
Mark Geier, MD, PhD
Dr. Richard Moskowitz
Richard C. Deth, PhD (Pharmacology)
Brain development is driven by changes in methylation of DNA and histone proteins which combine to provide epigenetic regulation. Methylation depends upon methionine synthase and vitamin B12. B12 status in the brain is distinct from the rest of the body, and brain levels of B12 are markedly lower in autism, schizophrenia and normal aging. Recent studies of the epigenetic effects of gluten and casein-derived opiate peptides indicate their significance for development and life-long disease risk.
The ability to resist oxidation and to adapt to environmental stressors is fundamental to homeostasis, and sulfur metabolism provides the foundation for these abilities. Signaling molecules with the ability to change the redox state can exert a broad influence over cellular metabolism, including methylation-mediated epigenetic effects on gene transcription that can persist across the lifespan and even across generations. Conversely, environmental factors which interfere with redox signaling can disrupt its regulatory role, contributing to a number of disorders affecting almost every aspect of physiological function. This lecture will provide an overview of the metabolic and biochemical relationships that control the redox state of cells, including tissue-specific differences.
There is extensive evidence indicating the occurrence of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and impaired methylation in autism and related neurodevelopmental disorders. This knowledge has assisted in identifying treatment approaches which can provide therapeutic benefit for many, but not all individuals. Autism serves to highlight the critical relationship between the GI tract and neurological/immunological development, in which epigenetic regulation plays a key role. The important role of genetic susceptibility can also be viewed within the context of redox and methylation-related metabolism. This lecture will review the scientific evidence for impaired redox and methylation status in autism, including possible causative factors and implications for treatment.
Learning objectives:
The clinician will:
Learn underlying physiological mechanisms vital to a deeper understanding of autism spectrum disorder
Understand the role of methylation in autism spectrum disorder
Understand the role of oxidative stress and inflammation in autism pathology
Understand the interrelationships of different body systems
Understand epigenetic regulation upon body systems
Dr. Deth will present recent findings of low levels of vitamin B12, methionine synthase activity and thiol metabolite status in the brain in autism, schizophrenia and aging. The influence of gluten and casein-derived opiate peptides on redox and methylation status and their epigenetic effects will also be discussed. The underlying mechanisms for these results will be reviewed in the context of the Redox/Methylation Hypothesis of Autism.


text:
Side Dish Recipes
Angel Hair Pasta with Garlic, Herbs, and ParmesanSimple angel hair pasta side, with olive oil, garlic, herbs and Parmesan. Easy! Cooks in 10 minutes.
ApplesauceDelicious homemade applesauce recipe. There is nothing better than homemade applesauce with hand-picked apples, and it is so easy to do!
AsparagusQuick and easy asparagus recipe! How to cook asparagus spears perfectly, dress with olive oil, Parmesan, and lemon zest.
Asparagus RisottoClassic asparagus risotto made with arborio rice, shallots, stock, fresh asparagus, and Parmesan cheese.
Asparagus with Hollandaise SauceElegant steamed asparagus served with a Hollandaise butter sauce.
Baby Bok Choy with CashewsQuick and easy baby bok choy recipe. Baby bok choy sauteed in olive oil with garlic, green onions and a dash of sesame oil. Then mixed with roasted, salted cashews.
Baby Bok Choy with Sherry and ProsciuttoBok choy cooked with garlic, sherry, chicken broth, and prosciutto.
Baby Bok Choy with Yellow Bell PeppersBaby bok choy, stir fried with sliced yellow bell peppers, green onions, and sesame oil.
Baked Asparagus with ParmesanBaked asparagus with olive oil and parmesan cheese. Easy and elegant!
Baked Beans in Tomato SauceWhite beans baked in tomato sauce with bacon, onions, garlic, honey, stock, and chili pepper flakes.
Baked Stuffed ArtichokesA perfect artichoke appetizer! Globe artichokes are trimmed and stuffed with herbed parmesan breadcrumb stuffing, then baked.
Balsamic Roasted Brussels Sprouts and ShallotsEasy! Brussels Sprouts roasted with shallots, tossed with balsamic vinegar and toasted walnuts.
Basmati Rice Salad with Peas, Mint, and LemonMinty, lemony rice salad made with basmati rice, peas, mint, lemon, and raisins.
Bavarian SauerkrautClassic sauerkraut recipe with chopped apple and juniper berries.
Beet GreensDelicious way to serve beet greens and other greens such as collard or kale. Beet greens recipe with bacon, garlic, onion, sugar, vinegar, and red pepper flakes.
Black Bean Burrito BowlBurrito Bowl! With black beans, rice, avocados, salsa, red cabbage, and lime.
Black Bean SaladA fresh black bean salad, perfect for a summer picnic or potluck. Red bell peppers, jalapeños, avocado, black beans and corn combined to give this salad its kick and fresh flavors.
Bourbon Mashed Sweet PotatoesSweet potatoes, boiled in water, mashed and mixed with bourbon whisky, butter, and sugar.
Braised FennelFennel bulbs braised until tender in anise liqueur and stock, then garnished with fennel fronds and orange zest.
Braised LeeksLeeks trimmed and gently braised in butter and white wine and seasoned with thyme, garlic and parsley.
Braised Marinated ArtichokesArtichokes braised in white wine and olive oil with shallots, garlic, parsley, and mint.
Braised OnionsPearl onions braised with butter and chicken stock, great side dish for roast beef or stews.
Braised Red Cabbage with ChestnutsSweet and sour red cabbage, cooked with bacon, apples, onions, and roasted chestnuts. Great holiday side!
Braised Sweet and Sour Red CabbageTraditional German and Austrian braised sweet sour red cabbage. Shredded red cabbage cooked with vinegar, sugar, and butter.
Brandied CranberriesFresh cranberries baked with sugar, brandy, and orange zest.
Broccoli Cheddar BitesCheesy baked broccoli snacks, great for a brunch, kid-friendly lunch, or party!


text:
Police: Man dead after hut fireFebruary 07,2013ST. ALBANS The St. Albans police department says a homeless man was found dead after fire destroyed a small hut on the edge of the Vermont city.
An autopsy is being conducted on the body of 54-year-old Richard Poquette to determine the cause of death, but police say the body had severe burns when it was found late Tuesday afternoon and indications are it was an accidental fire death, which may have been started by a burning candle.
Police were called to a wooded area, about 100 yards from North Main Street, at about 4:10 p.m. Thursday after a caller reported finding a body. Poquettes body was found outside the hut, which had been destroyed by fire and was still smoldering.MORE IN Vermont NewsMIDDLETOWN, Conn. Full StoryMONTPELIER A pending deal between the state and federal governments will give a big boost to... Full StoryMONTPELIER Vermont has reached a deal with the federal government to move forward with a plan... Full Story
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed


text:
Serve Delaware's mission is to enrich lives and communities by advocating service and volunteerism. To this end, Serve Delaware is a catalyst for positive social change and community service that works with AmeriCorps members, community organizations to address unmet needs in Delaware. Serve Delaware is the starting point for individuals and organizations that are interested in joining with others to solve tough community problems.
Serve Delaware recruits and supports thousands of individuals to improve the lives of Delawareans by providing life-changing service opportunities that focus on economic opportunity, environmental stewardship, educational achievement, and disaster services among others.


text:
More on "Collect SAPGUI patch numbers"
This tip offers more information about the tip 'Collect SAPGUI patch numbers.' It will help if you have an ITS server.
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.
- IF rfc_data-rfchost NE '<my-its-host>'. CALL FUNCTION 'GUI_GET_FILE_INFO' EXPORTING fname = 'SAPGUI.EXE' IMPORTING file_version = patch_level. ENDIF.
Dig Deeper on SAP Basis administration and NetWeaver administration
Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.


text:
Actual web site (wix.com) with flash player to be converted into wordpress
This project received 17 bids from talented freelancers with an average bid price of $ USD.Get free quotes for a project like this
Skills Required
Project Budget$30 - $250 USD
Total Bids17
Project Description
I need my actual website made with [url removed, login to view] and using flashplayer ( [url removed, login to view] ) to be converted into wordpress and it has to look the [url removed, login to view] you.
Looking to make some money?
- Set your budget and the timeframe
- Outline your proposal
- Get paid for your work
Hire Freelancers who also bid on this project
Looking for work?
Work on projects like this and make money from home!Sign Up Now
- Forbes
- The New York Times
- Time
- Wall Street Journal
- Times Online


text:
We found 1 that has recently dropped in price.
Sign up to see this price drop and to receive future price drop notifications.
Total Reviews
Write a
Sort by
2001 Honda Accord Coupe EX 2dr Coupe w/Leather (2.3L 4cyl 5M)
This is the best car. I have owned it for 15 years and have had no problems. I could drive for hours in comfort.
I purchased this car in 2008 from a friend who was the second owner. I drive this car like crazy around town and have put on over 100k miles in the last few years. My car now has about 220k miles and is still running great. The clutch still hasn't needed to be replaced. Have had to do the normal maintenance on it like belts, spark plugs, tires, battery, brakes and of course the AC, but that goes for any old car. Yeah the windows don't even roll down any more, but that's because both windows had been broken into and had to be replaced by first and second owners. I honestly think this car can go at least another 100k if I continue to take good care of it!!!
leather, controls on steering wheel, comfort of seats.
Honda needs to improve on AC quality.
Help |
About Us |
Contact Us |
Careers |
Affiliate Program |
Dealer Center |
Privacy Statement |
Visitor Agreement |
Membership Agreement
Your Ad Choices
| Site Map
| Glossary
| Mobile
| Developers
Follow Edmunds
© Edmunds.com, Inc.


text:
Jed BowtellShared publicly -
Summer's almost done, but this Autumn promises to be more fun than a Bondi bikini party. Check the form:
Summer is almost over. Usually that's met with plenty of groans around the Sportsbet office. But this year Autumn is promising to be more fun than
Add a comment...


text:
ARSSP00002-2003-06 Complete Air Shock Assembly Front Pair Arnott AS-2139
hablamos español:
Read More
2003-2006 Lincoln Navigator Front Complete Air Shock Assembly Pair Arnott AS-2139ARSSP00002-545789
Part Details
- Front / Rear Location: Front
- Quantity: Pair
This part replaces:
- Arnott AS-2139
- New
As the industry leader in manufacturing quality air suspension parts and accessories for over 20 years, Arnott is the best choice for your vehicle.
- Brand New Arnott Air Shock Assemblies
- Comes as a PAIR
- Fits both LH (Driver Side) & RH (Passenger Side) FRONT
- Fits both LH (Driver Side) & RH (Passenger Side) FRONT
- Each shock includes:
- Bilstein shock
- Air spring
- Upper mount
- Direct replacements
- Built to strict quality control standards
- Correct for both 2WD & 4WD models
Lifetime Warranty
This item is backed by a Limited Lifetime Warranty. In the event this item should fail due to manufacturing defects during intended use, we will exchange the part free of charge (excludes shipping charges) for the original purchaser. Please keep your invoice for proof of this warranty.
Vehicle Fit
- 2003-2006 Ford Expedition Front Complete Air Shock Assembly Pair Arnott AS-2139
- 2003-2006 Lincoln Navigator Front Complete Air Shock Assembly Pair Arnott AS-2139
Part #: ARSSP00002
Ships Same Day for orders placed by 5 P.M. ET
Free GROUND SHIPPINGCheck Shipping Rates
Brand #: AS-2139
We're here to help
Call Toll Free
hablamos español:
Customer Feedback
"Thanks for the fast reliable service. Great price, and the headlights were as good as oem or better!!! Keep up the good work..."- Dwuan M.
Read More


text:
There are 44 Recipes for Appetizers
|Wild Salmon with Tandoori Marinade
|Wolfgang's Potstickers
|Wolfgang's Spring Rolls
|Yellow Finnish Potato with Creme Fraiche
Featured Recipe
I ate crabcakes for the first time in Chesapeake Bay. To my dismay, I tasted more potato than crab. I took home a few pounds of fresh lump crabmeat, experimented with it, and finally came up with this recipe. If you can't find fresh crabmeat, you can make this with uncooked shrimp.


text:
Kyle Busch Wins In Atlanta, Clinches Chase Berth
HAMPTON, Ga. (AP) ? Kyle Busch will be part of NASCAR's Chase for the championship.
Busch locked up a berth with his fourth victory of the year, taking the checkered flag at Atlanta Motor Speedway. He emerged with the lead after a rapid-fire series of caution flags near the end, and he held off hard-charging Joey Logano to win by 0.740 seconds.
Martin Truex Jr took third despite a broken right wrist. Kurt Busch and Ryan Newman round out the top five.
Source: Associated Press


text:
That explains the major drop today so that they can cover some shares. With small float alls it takes is selling 200k shares to drop this 8 points with the longs jumping in on selling. I suspect there will be major covering throughout the day if the weakened longs get out the way. Should still close near breakeven for the day if the scared longs hold up from selling.
Sentiment: Strong Buy


text:
LivingSocial in Fast Lane
Tim O'Shaughnessy, CEO of LivingSocial, in an interview, talks about coping with rapid growth, proliferation of rivals and trying to keep up
Excitement and Innovation at All Things Digital Conference
At The Wall Street Journal's 2011 All Things Digital Conference, Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher talked to industry leaders
Mobile Social Commerce — A Report from 360i - Digital Connections - 360i...
360i Digital Connections. About Digital Connections Contributors 360i.com. Digital Connections provides a look at new and emerging innovatio
How Virgin Galactic Plans to Open Space Travel to the Masses
Virgin Galactic CEO George Whitesides speaks to Mashable about how his company is working to make space accessible to the masses.
How the Steve Jobs Story Hits Home - iVillage
Our guy, our main squeeze -- the benchmark of innovation -- has quit. Steve Jobs said he�d step down before the rumor mill called it for h
The Social-Media Habits of Highly-Effective Industry Execs | Digital - A...
Ad & Marketing News. Creativity; Ad Age Data Center; Ad Age China; Ad Age On Campus; Insights; Jobs; MarketFinder. Register Now | Login.
Steve Jobs Speaks in 1990 About Tech [RARE VIDEO]
In this fascinating raw footage from 1990, Steve Jobs talks at great length to a WGBH-Boston interviewer about his ideas about the direction
For Offline Retailers, The Trouble With Price Transparency - Forbes
Guest post written by Paul Patterson Paul Patterson is senior VP and co-founder of Eyeona, which provides a free mobile shopping app. Paul P
Savvy rebrands as Eyeona to help retailers fight Amazon
Pricetector, which launched a price adjustment service called Savvy.com in November, is rebranding under the name Eyeona, as it looks to bec
Where's the Loyalty | Now, That's savvy!
Loyalty programs are clearly broken and we want to help solve that problem. Join us, the consumers, in not only spending dollars on shiny ca
Top 7 Shopping Apps to Save Money and Time This Holiday Season | Type-A...
What's new ? Post in: My Profile, 30 Days to Make and Sell an Ebook, 5 Keys to Balancing Work and Life, air-max-pas-cher, Amazing People
Reactions to Steve Jobs Death - iVillage
My friend Rita sat in her grief group when the text message came in that former CEO of Apple Inc. Steve Jobs had died. "My heart just
Every Child Left Behind | Garza Girls
I want so badly to write a post about the No Child Left Behind Act that is tearing into schools and communities throughout California. I wan
Joanne Bamberger's response to 'Boehner losing control of the House?' - ...
Joanne Bamberger's response to 'Boehner losing control of the House?'
Making the Most of Groupon
For many businesses, the coupon service comes with some hefty caveats. Now a growing number of entrepreneurs are finding ways to better mana


text:
If you are a local business in Melbourne and looking for search engine marketing services then check out this Hawthorn SEO Company
Local Business Marketing
Hiring a search engine ranking services is a tough job, and one that requires very specific insider industry knowledge. You should consult with other small business owners in the area to get a handle on who provides the best SEO service and who doesn't. You can usually judge this book by it's cover, aka it's own search engine ranking. You wouldn't buy web design services from a web designer with poor designs, so why would you buy search engine optimization services from an agency or individual like an independent consultant that can't even rank themselves among the local competition. This is a big red flag and something you should consider to the highest priority when looking to rank your website.
Now that we've covered what goes into hiring a marketing agency we will touch on what actually goes into a successful local marketing campaign that gets you customers and visitors and makes a difference in your bottom line at the end of the month.
Google my business is the best place to start when setting up a new businesses or an older established businesses marketing campaign. You can visit the Google my business site to get started, you'll have to enter all of your businesses information including an address. You can chose to set the profile to say that you serve customers at this location or you can set it to say that your serve customers at their locations (for example this is something a plumber or electrician would set). Selecting the second option means that you will see a radius in google maps instead of a pin on the map at a specific geographic location (ex. Calgary SEO) in the city that you service.
Local citations are the next best way to get noticed as a local business. You need to be careful and ensure that the address and phone number on your website are the same across all the citations you create. Some citations are free, like the ones you can leave on a Facebook page or LinkedIn company page, other citations require payment like a yellow pages listing. Another free citation is yelp, which is a great resource because it usually ranks quite high in search and give your business great visibility.
Reviews are the third most important factor, Google takes a strong look at reviews. Wouldn't you? That's why they do it. Reviews are small but significant votes of confidence for a business and google only wants the best businesses ranking high in search so that people will trust the sites put forth and recommended by the search engine. this is integral to googles success to they place great important on things like reviews.
Comparison Websites
It is worth noting that a lot of the most successful businesses on the Internet these days are not websites selling a particular website or service, but the ones that compare the services and products on the market. It makes sense that these websites are getting most of the traffic as people want to know the ins and outs of the product they are interested in before they buy it. Furthermore, they want this information from a third party source that supposedly does not profit (at least directly) from the sale of that particular product or service.
Websites that compare and contrast healthcare services or providers are gaining more popularity as well. These sites have forums and ratings for patients of various doctors and surgeons to rate their service online. On one level this is beneficial for the doctors as they are getting free marketing or advertising for their services. They gain popularity without having to pay for it. One another level though, their reputation is more fragile than ever. One bad review gets more attention than 10 positive ones.
This is no doubt daunting for most doctors, who already have to be very careful thanks to the very strict legislation and fear of being sued in the healthcare industry.
Surgeon Listings
Almost all forms of businesses these days have directories popping up left, right and centre on the internet. One such industry is the marvellous medical world of plastic surgery. Going under the knife is a big deal and major decision for a lot of people. And thus, it only makes sense that like getting a first mortgage, it is very important to do extensive research before making any decision. The fact that any mistakes or bad decisions can lead to permanent or long lasting damage to their body and physical appearance leads to potential clients being very careful in the way they about this selection process.
If you are interested in finding a good quality local doctor for your procedure, then visit www.plasticsurgeondirectory.com.au. This directory site consists of listings based on the surgeons' reviews, popularity and location.
Due to the overflow of information in today's internet age, having directories and listings based on past customer reviews, reputation and the web presence of the surgeon really makes it a streamlined process for the clients to go about their search. They can search by location and find the most reputable doctor near them without having to read through a range of positive, negative and neutral reviews and try to figure out which surgeon has how many of each and is also close to their home.
If someone who is unhappy with the shape of their nose, breasts or is struggling with fat loss, they can use this directory to find a reputable plastic surgeon in Geelong. There are plenty of horror stories online from people who made the wrong decision when it comes to picking the right doctor for their operation. Unfortunately, some of these doctors are often very good at marketing, commercials and in most cases, television. This is why a directory based on third party reviews and past customer experience is by far the best criteria when assessing for quality.
And if you happen to living in Perth, then click on this link to find a Perth rhinoplasty surgeon
Before you make any decisions, make sure to call your surgeon and discuss what your expectations are from the surgery. It is very important to establish trust with your doctor first and put any questions and doubts to rest before you proceed. Some clinics even offer free quotes for particular procedures and this may be a good option for you if you are wanting to look around and meet multiple doctors before you make your decision. When it comes to surgery, up front communication is very important so that expectations from both sides can be aligned to reach the same goal.


text:
- Understanding the fierce devotion behind the Black Nazarene
- Quiapo Church Family and Life Free Counseling Services
- Quiapo Church's Rule on Processioning of the images of the Black Nazarene
- "Mabuhay, Lolo Kiko! Pagsulyap sa Pagbisita ng Santo Papa sa Pilipinas."
- Meet the Jesuits Discernment Seminar
- Traslacion 2015 Press Conference Media Kit
- T-shirt Layout for Traslacion 2015
- Homiliya sa Save Sierra Madre Day Lub. Kgg. Roberto C. Mallari, D.D. Obispo ng San Jose, Nueva Ecija
- Rosary for PEACE
- NFA rice is available in the parish
- Quiapo Church accepts donations for its disaster relief operations. Please send donations to:
- PhilHealth Express Quiapo
- Mass and Healing Service
- PRE-CANA Seminar
CBCP Updates
Still no to divorce, says Cardinal Rosales
Mar 25, 2015
Pinoy prelate in UN: Thank you, young pro-lifers
Mar 20, 2015
House Bill 5373 – RH Law Repeal Act
Feb 23, 2015
Welcome to Quiapo Church
Read more...
TV Maria.
About Quiapo
Manila Bay Reclamation Project
Parish News
Pagdalaw ng Anak sa Ina
Nov 30, 2015
March of the Saints
Nov 09, 2015
Healing Mass and Service for the Month of November
Nov 09, 2015
Extraordinary Ministers of the Holy Communion CommissioningHealing Mass and Service for the Month of November
Nov 06, 2015
MBBN Staff Monthly Formation
Nov 04, 2015
Save Sierra Madre: An Environmental Advocacy
Oct 01, 2015
Psycho-Social Integration Orientation
Oct 01, 2015
Wellness Program
Sep 30, 2015
BEC Bible Study @ Bukluran San Lorenzo Ruiz
Sep 22, 2015
Disaster Management Orientation: HDN-Marshalls
Sep 15, 2015
Radio Communication Seminar
Sep 14, 2015
PPCRV: Boto Ko, Dangal Ko, Ipagtatanggol Ko
Sep 09, 2015


text:
When the Alabama board of education voted to approve a new set of science standards on September 10, 2015, in which evolution was described as "substantiated with much direct and indirect evidence," the question arose: what will become of the evolution disclaimer in Alabama's textbooks?
NCSE is pleased to offer a free preview (PDF) of Donald R. Prothero's The Story of Life in 25 Fossils (Columbia University Press, 2015).
The California Science Teachers Association adopted a position statement on climate change education at its board meeting on September 12, 2015.
As the tenth anniversary of Kitzmiller v. Dover approaches, the York Daily Record (September 11, 2015) devoted a suite of stories to the landmark case, which established the unconstitutionality of teaching "intelligent design" creationism in the public schools.
The Alabama state board of education voted unanimously to approve a new set of science standards on September 10, 2015, according to National Public Radio (September 10, 2015) — and evolution is described as "substantiated with much direct and indirect evidence."
A federal lawsuit contending that teaching evolution in West Virginia's public schools is unconstitutional is over. In the decision (PDF) in Smith v. Jefferson County School Board et al., issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia on August 25, 2015, the defendants' motions to dismiss the case were granted.
NCSE is pleased to announce that the latest issue of Reports of the National Center for Science Education is now available on-line.
A milestone: there are now over 120,000 fans of NCSE's Facebook page. Why not join them, by visiting the page and becoming a fan by clicking on the "Like" box by NCSE's name?
Eric Davidson
The eminent developmental biologist Eric Davidson died on September 1, 2015, at the age of 78, according to a September 2, 2015, notice from Caltech.
William B. Provine
The historian of science William B. Provine died on September 1, 2015, at the age of 73, according to a Facebook post from his wife.
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
1904 Franklin Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612
fax: 510-788-7971
For Reporters | Store | Events


text:
Am reviewing for an exam and have NO IDEA how to do even setthese up. Can't solve. Help!
Please show steps so I can do the rest. The book isuseless. Test is Wednesday, Apr 15.
1. 1+csc X = cos X + cot X
sec X
sec X
2. cos X-cos Y + sin X-sin Y = 0
sin X+sin Y cosX+cosY
3. 2sin3q cosq + 2sinqcos3q = sin2q
Greatly appreciate ANY help I can get!!! Thanks inadvance!


text: Corey Hartstone [NZ] Corey Hartstone comment, favorite and share my music! Hey there everybody. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to listen to my tracks and mixes. Hope you enjoy! Sharing is caring. Feel free to download, and share my music if you like it. Pass it on, paying for music is the worst. An edit that I did for this wonderful remix. Free download. ENJOY! Lana Del Rey - Video Games (Cazzette Remix) (Corey Hartstone Edit) DOWNLOAD LINK ~~~ http://www.mediafire.com/?dwbj9zm26vqtajw Corey Hartstone [NZ]'s tracks Drepa - No More (Corey Hartstone Remix) by Corey Hartstone [NZ] published on 2012/04/11 01:08:53 +0000 Deep & Dark Mix (FREE DOWNLOAD, SHARE ON FACEBOOK & TWITTER) by Corey Hartstone [NZ] published on 2012/01/07 16:05:51 +0000


text:
ABX bribed KIRCHNER Government Civil servants in Argentina to land permits at PASCUA PONZI SCAM no titles just DECEPTION ERMITS WOULD DO TO DECEIVE SLW shareholders and banks..
ABX bribed BACHELET to not investigate LAGOS and her actions to protect PASCUA PONZI SCAM
ABX investigated under UN anti corruption laws,.
Argentina did not complete investigation why? NORMAL current Government will not investigate itself
However BACHELET not investigating LAGOS + issuing WATER RIGTS to Barrick prior to a NEW YORK meal whereat BACHELET was brewed for her UN POST to remain MUM to date and go back to Chile now tp GET ELECTED BY ABX MEDIA OUTLETS?
After receiving the CFR suit pin, ,BACHELET FORGOT CHILE, joined UN and PROTECTED ABX + LAGOS hanky panky at PASCUA PONZI SCAM
What good did it do?
ABX conspired against pension funds of people who went to war to defend the word DEMOCRACY
ABX bribed Governments v. LOPEHANDIA 1996-2013 at PASCUA and Lopehandia + MSX got them CRIMINALLY CHARGED 2012 + shall re open UN ANTI CORRUPTION LAWS investigation, re starting 2013 by RCMP
WARNING You are conducting CIVIL RICO daily trades as INSIDERS TANK these corruption vipers nests
If SLW wants 1 oz of SILVER from PASCUA PONZI SCAM better pay MSX + LOPEHANDIA or perish