text:
On September 23, 2015
Smashed Shepards
Richard Lynch (I've Made Up My Mind)
Before A Storm There Are Rainbows In The Field
Halloween Is Black As Night It Seems
Fables Of The Reincarnation
Lucifer, The Light
Doleful Lions Vs. The PMRC
This Is The Age Of Video Violence
Samhain Wizards: Live on WZRD-FM 10.31.13
Doleful Lions Chicago, Illinois
Since 1996.
Doleful Lions are Jonathan Scott & Robert Lee Scott. Jonathan and Rob first recorded together in the summer of 1990 at Six Flags Great America covering the immortal Hall & Oates classic "Private Eyes". Very little has changed since. We celebrate their entire discography on Bandcamp. Still looking for the original DL demo & the cover of Private Eyes. Contact us if you have them. ... more
Streaming and Download help


text:
Sophos Wireless helps partners simplify Wi-Fi protectionJul 26
Sophos has just introduced its first cloud-based solution for the protection and management of wireless networks. Read More →
Sophos has just introduced its first cloud-based solution for the protection and management of wireless networks. Read More →
"People leave mobile phones and USB sticks in the back of taxis and accidentally email documents to the wrong person all the time," Read More →
Featured Exeed has been appointed to manage Sophos' Kiwi distribution in a move the vendor says will bring significant incremental revenue for resellers. Read More →
Sophos' latest offering synchronises real time threat information between endpoints and the network firewall or UTM to provide faster threat detection Read More →
"Greater demand for flexible hosted service offerings also encouraged many vendors to develop dedicated SaaS solutions at lower price points." Read More →
"Our ANZ partners continue to outperform our expectations by focusing on increasing their product expertise and services to deliver exceptional results." Read More →
Sophos has revealed a major refresh of its network Security Gateway hardware with the availability of the new Sophos SG Series appliances in Australia and New Zealand. Read More →
New years generally begin with new goals and IT distributor Connector Systems has kicked off 2014 flying New Zealand's local flag. Read More →
Sophos has acquired Cyberoam Technologies, a leading global provider of network security products. Read More →
"A meaningful presence in Silicon Valley gives us a golden opportunity to capitalise on the technology trends and partnership opportunities that are so abundant in this area." Read More →
"While many security experts are aware of the high level trends, few have recognised their significance." Read More →
IT security and data protection company Sophos has revealed a new partnership agreement with Commulynx, a leading technology integrator and consultancy. Read More →
IT security and data protection firm go on the offensive with four new hires across its business development and sales team. Read More →
Research reveals over half of SMBs globally do not see cyber attack as a significant risk. Read More →
Global security firm set to bring its cloud solution to the ANZ region later this month, offering "only end-point security to begin with." Read More →
Every business, regardless of size, is vulnerable to information theft and security breaches. Read More →
Sophos has announced a strategy to deliver cloud-managed security solutions that appeal to organisations seeking a simpler approach to IT security. Read More →
Organisations need Wi-Fi. Help your customers choose a simple and secure wireless access solution for their employees and guests. Read More →
Sophos releases list of the world's worst offenders in spam. Read More →
Security experts Sophos say a dozing bank clerk who "nodded off at his keyboard during a transaction" has taught us all a security lesson. Read More →

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Summer Employment with the Department
The application period for the 2016 Missouri Department of Natural Resources Summer Professional Development Program has closed.
The Summer Professional Development Program is designed to provide college students or recent graduates with real-life experience working alongside the department's engineers, scientists, natural resource managers and other professionals. There are paid and unpaid opportunities. Most majors will be considered with special consideration given to: Agriculture, Architecture, Atmospheric Science, Biology, Chemistry, Engineering, Environmental Science, Geography, Historic Preservation, History, Interpretation, Landscaping, Museum Studies, Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation, Tourism, Accounting, Business Administration and Human Resources.
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources' mission is to protect our air, land and water; preserve our unique natural and historic places; and provide recreational and learning opportunities for everyone. The department's mission requires a diverse workforce statewide and includes 88 state parks and historic sites throughout Missouri. Opportunities with the Summer Professional Development Program exist statewide. Students may apply during the fall of each year to any or all of the following programs with opportunities: Division of Environmental Quality, Missouri State Parks, Missouri Geological Survey and Division of Administrative Services (for non-science majors).
Please direct all inquiries regarding internships to Tiffani Martin via email or by calling 573-522-1503 or mailing to:
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Human Resources Program
PO Box 176
Jefferson City, MO 65102


text:
Group Booking Terms and Conditions
Because you are making a Group Booking, there are additional Terms and Conditions that apply. Please read them and click 'I Accept' below to continue with your booking
Hostel Specific Terms & Conditions
The remainder of the amount due will be charged to your credit card on arrival. Should numbers or room selection change, the per person deposit times the number of people who actually travelled will be deducted from the total accommodation charge levvied by the hostel.
Cancellation / No Show & Reduction in Numbers Policy
- For full reimbursement of the paid amount you must give 30 days notice before the arrival date.
- 50% of the paid amount if notice is given within ten days of arrival.
- No reimbursement if notice is given less than 24 hours previous to arrival.
- In the case of no-show or cancellation less than 24 hours the Hostel reserves the right to:
- To take payment equal to the amount of first day's stay for the number of places reserved.
- In cases in which the number upon arrival is more than reserved there is no guarantee for the lodging of the persons exceeding the number of the places reserved
Any cancellations resulting from agreement to these terms and conditions under false pretences will result in loss of deposit.
General Group Booking Terms
By making a group reservation through Hostelworld.com you agree to the following terms and conditions as set by Hostelworld.com and as set by the hostel in question.
- In order to make a group reservation on Hostelworld.com it is necessary to pay a deposit. The balance is due directly to the hostel according to their payment conditions.
- The booking deposit is non-refundable
- Hostelworld.com are not responsible for changes or amendments to your reservation once it has been processed. All correspondence with regard to changes to your booking need to be dealt with directly with the hostel.
- Cancellations for reservations must be made directly with the hostel and must conform with the individual hostels cancellation policy (see below)
- It is your responsibility to pay the balance of your accommodation cost to the hostel in accordance with their payment conditions (see below). Failure to do so may result in your reservation being cancelled by the hostel.
- Individual hostels may have special booking conditions relating to group stays, please read the hostel booking conditions carefully before making your reservation.
Snart utsolgt
Beskrivelse av overnattingssted
Siste omtale
" Nice hostel with a great outdoor bar (but take insect repellent). Happy hour is a glass of beer or sangria for €1 but it's a very small glass! Would definitely call it querky and reminded us of a standard convent from a film. Location isn't great, it's about a 40 minute walk to the main centre. However it is right next door to a supermarket. The self catering they advertise is just a microwave. Would recommend this hostel. "- Anonym
Hostelworld mobilapper
Bestill mens du er på farten med de nye mobilappene til Hostelworld.


text:
Liverpool Message Board
you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
LFC_Armchair_Supporter LFC_Armchair_Supporter Nov 30, 2011 18:07 Flag
Carling semis
I'm not concerned who we get.. I feel we can beat any1 we come up against if we play as well as i know we can..Sort: Newest | Oldest | Most Replied Expand all replies
Im calling it now it will be liverpool vs city 2nd leg away and cardiff vs man u with man u playing 2nd leg at home.
- 1 Reply to keiron
and without Lucas - one of our best players. Step up Jonjo Shelvey, now is the time!


text:
Pdf To Swf Converter 3000Free
Quick Specs
Total Downloads:14,297
Date Added:Jun. 15, 2009
File Size:11.66MB
Downloads Last Week:3
From Allimagetool Software: Pdf to Swf Converter 3000 is powerful PDF to Flash video SWF converter. With it, you can view PDF file with a flash player or upload your PDF file on the internet to share with more people. It can free batch pdf files to swf with ease. It can preserve original layout, text, images etc of your pdf file. More, the processing speed is very fast. User-friendly interface is very easy to use with merely a few clicks. Advanced features: Simultaneously convert massive PDF files to SWF once. Support the encrypted PDF. Convert PDF to SWF video with high quality. Support page range conversion (all, from-to, individual pages). According to the image size of SWF, automatically stretch/shrink image size. Support Flash6 format compression to compress the output file size. Precise control the output quality with user-defined parameters settings. SWF supports automatically play. Key features: Do not need any print driver and Adobe Acrobat software. Support add the entire folder to convert. If you do not have time to convert the files of list now, you can save the converted list to your computer. Do not need to load every file again. Have the option to auto open the output folder when conversion finished. User-friendly interface, very easy to use, just a few clicks can finish the conversion. Be amazed at fast conversion speed and excellent output quality without losing any original content.
read more +
see all reviews +
read more +
More Products to Consider
- Print to PDF from Windows applications and optimize the PDF ...Convert any printable document to PDF format.Open, view, and convert Adobe PDF files.Open, view, edit, and save PDF files without Adobe Acrobat.
- Convert PDF documents to JPEG, BMP, PNG, and TIFF files.Foxit Reader is a small, fast, and feature rich PDF softwareView AutoCAD DWG, DXF, and DWF drawings, save views to JPEG ...Design graphics, layouts, edit photos, and create Web sites.
- Convert PDF files to Flash videos.Open, view, and convert Adobe PDF files.Convert PDF to Word file format.Convert PCL, PXL, PX3 to PDF.
- Convert PDF files to Word, Excel, TXT, PowerPoint, HTML, ePu...Create 3D models and upload them to Google Earth.Convert HTML pages to PDF or image formats.Create 3D designs in a more streamlined, collaborative envir...
- Convert XPS to PDF documents.Scan and save paper documents as PDF files.Convert PCL, PXL, PX3 to PDF.Convert XPS to PDF documents.


text:
As for WP support, that's a different kettle of fish, one that I've complained about. Search my profile posts. I rate it a solid "meh". It's not bad, but it's not great. Could be better.
wordpress support is only as good as the people that reply. If youre not pitching in, you cant really complain.
Thats not me pointing fingers at anyone, i'm just saying..its kinda like people that dont vote, ya know?
way too many people come here and assume, incorrectly:
1. that moderators have special powers, or are being compensated to provide support
2. that wordpress guarantees some level of support that is provided on these forums.
Neither of the above is true.
As it stands now, and of course, things could change next week, support around here is user driven, like nearly every other opensource project.


text:
I cannot figure out how to remove the white around my header. I tried removing the margin around the entire site, but then the content in my site looks odd. What I need to is to stretch my header outwards, and remove the white above the image.
my website is here.


text:
A Coast Guard spokeswoman says river traffic in that section southeast of Cincinnati must get Coast Guard clearance and maintain a safe speed as the cleanup continues. The spill was initially reported as about 5,000 to 8,000 gallons, but Coast Guard spokeswoman Lt. Katherine Cameron says authorities on site had lowered the estimate to around 4,000 to 5,000 gallons as of Tuesday evening.
A Duke Energy spokeswoman says the spill from a Duke power plant in New Richmond happened late Monday night.
The Charlotte, North Carolina-based Duke says the spill occurred during a fuel transfer and lasted about 10 to 15 minutes.


text:
FiltersShow / Hide
- All Events
- Music
- Comedy
- Theatre & Shows
- Sport
- Cinema
- Festivals
- Days Out
- Edinburgh Fringe
- Anywhere In The UK
- Location: Anywhere in the UK
Radius: ... miles
For over 100 years, the Pavilion has stayed close to it roots producing and providing a traditional venue for Comedy, Music, Variety and all other areas of Entertainment.
Situated in the heart of Glasgow's Theatreland, the Pavilion is one of the oldest theatres in Scotland but is well equipped to produce the best in entertainment in the 21st century.
There is something for everyone at the Pavilion, come along and see.
Capacity: 1,439.
65 upcoming events at The Pavilion Theatre:
Track The Pavilion Theatre
- You are tracking The Pavilion Theatre
Fans of this venue also track:
- Be the first to hear about new events at The Pavilion Theatre
- Alerts are free & always will be
- 1,300,905 fans now rely on Ents24 alerts
- We hate spam, your email will never be shared
September 2016
A Night With The Irish Country Stars:
Hugo Duncan, Gary Gamble, Joe Moore
Curtis Magee, Box Car Brian
From: £19.50
Stand By Me - A Celebration of Ben E King & The Drifters (Touring)
From: £26.00
October 2016
November 2016
Elfie's Magical Adventure:
Grado, Liam Dolan, Nicola Park
Stephen Purdon, Craig Glover
From: £21.50
December 2016
Elfies Magical Adventure:
Grado, Liam Dolan, nicola Park
Stephen Purdon, Craig Glover
From: £23.50
January 2017
Ents24 Widget
PutCustomisable, flexible tour date widget… Super quick set-up, get the code here: event listings on your web site
Venue Facts
Venue: The Pavilion Theatre
121 Renfield Street
Website: paviliontheatre.co.uk
Phone: 0141 332 1846
Disabled Bookings: 0141 332 1846
→ Glasgow Queen Street 6 min walk
News and Announcements RSS feed
No current news or announcements.
Have Your Say
great customer services, excellent access for disabled extremely helpful and friendly staff, unlike facilities at Edinburgh Playhouse( no disabled access or help) Lesley Young from Bo ness
Have you been to The Pavilion Theatre? Write a review
Readers who like 'The Pavilion Theatre' also like:
The SECC, Clyde Auditorium (The Armadillo) & Lomond Auditorium
The SECC, Clyde Auditorium (The Armadillo) & Lomond Auditorium: Glasgow
Do you represent The Pavilion Theatre, or are you a member of their promotional team? Click here to claim this page


text:
DC crowd pushes through barriers to WWII Memorial
WASHINGTON (AP) – A crowd converged on the World War II Memorial on the National Mall on Sunday, pushing past barriers to protest the memorial's closing under the government shutdown.
Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah, along with former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, were part of the demonstrators.
Cruz and Lee are among the tea party-backed lawmakers who refused to keep the government operating unless President Barack Obama agreed to defund the nation's health care overhaul.
"Let me ask a simple question," Cruz told the crowd of hundreds that gathered beginning at 9 a.m. "Why is the federal government spending money to erect barricades to keep veterans out of this memorial?"
Black metal barricades have lined the front of the memorial since the government closed Oct. 1. That's when more than 300 National Park Service workers who staff and maintain the National Mall were furloughed.
As the crowd entered the memorial plaza, they chanted "Tear down these walls" and "You work for us." They sang "God bless America" and other songs.
"Our vets have proven that they have not been timid, so we will not be timid in calling out any who would use our military, our vets, as pawns in a political game," Palin told the crowd.
The memorial has become a political symbol in the bitter fight between Democrats and Republicans over who is to blame for the shutdown. Earlier rallies have focused on allowing access for World War II veterans visiting from across the country.
Sunday's rally was more political. A protest by truckers converged with a rally by a group called the Million Vet March at the memorial. Participants cut the plastic links between metal barriers at the National Park Service site and pushed them aside.
Later, some protesters carried metal barricades that look like bicycle racks from the memorial to the White House and stacked them up outside the gates, confronting police in riot gear. Some protesters carried signs reading "Impeach Obama."
Police moved the protesters back to set up barricades between the crowd and the White House gate. Some protesters chanted "shame on you" at the officers.
An armored police vehicle also was sent to the World War II Memorial as people lingered there.
District of Columbia police said the crowd was dispersing by 1 p.m., about four hours after the protests began. U.S. Park Police said there had been one arrest at the Lincoln Memorial for assault, but it was not related to the protest, said Lt. Pamela Smith.
Jim Weller of Allentown, Pa., said he came to protest "to stand up for my rights."
"My father was a World War II veteran, shot down in the Philippines in 1945, and for them to shut down this memorial is absurd," he said.
Cindy Good had a message for lawmakers.
"They need to listen to the American people," she said, "and try to work together in Congress to get this whole thing worked out."
After the protest, U.S. Park Police worked to secure the World War II Memorial again, and Smith said they were still closed because of the shutdown.
The Park Police officers, who have been guarding the memorials amid protests over their closure, are not being paid during the government shutdown.
(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Sponsored Articles
- The Pac-12 football season nears kickoff
- Tips to get ready for a pain-free golf season
- Protect your family with these 7 home security features
- How to train like an Olympic swimmer
- 2016 Olympics: A guide to must-see TV events
- The bride's guide to feeling your best on your wedding day
- Deciding when you need knee surgery
- Celebrating Fourth of July is much cooler in these AZ towns
- Top ten road trip bathrooms in America
- Six things causing a pain in your neck
- 5 things to make your summer move easier
- Three elements of a strong timeshare exit guarantee
- Stretches and exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome
- The best Major League ballparks have their own personality
- Comparing the best regular seasons: The '96 Bulls and '16 Warriors
- 3 Arizona road trips and the vehicles to get you there
- Colon cancer is preventable. Check these signs and symptoms to stay healthy.
- 6 of the biggest skin cancer myths
- Affordable small home makeover ideas
- Locals helping locals: 6 success stories you need to know about
- Sunscreen facts that could save your life
- 6 energy saving hacks for your home
- 5 tips for choosing a company to end your timeshare
- Overlooked water tips to save you money
- 5 of the most adored gentlemen in professional sports today
- The real danger of sitting at your desk
- Most surprising NBA playoff performances of the last 40 years
- 11 classic baseball movies you must see again
- Finally getting rid of fat: 3 methods that actually work
- 4 reasons cancer survivors should focus on food


text:
Our association was formed to promote the growth and development of physician assistants who have an active interest in the field of allergy, asthma, and immunology. We provide the general membership with a forum for informal assembly regarding the issues that relate to physician assistants in allergy, asthma, and immunology. We facilitate mutual assistance and support of physician assistants, health professionals, and health services by organizing and disseminating health care information through forums, panels, and other similar programs concerning the delivery and quality of health care services. In addition, we develop and maintain a speakers bureau for the Academy and its members.
AAPA-AAI is excited to share with you information about the launch of "Medikidz Explain Asthma Part 3." AAPA-AAI is a proud partner of this latest installment of the Medikidz series.
Meda Pharmaceuticals (Meda), a leading international specialty pharmaceutical company, announces the launch of Part 3 of the Medikidz Explain Asthma Series, the latest comic book to help families gain an accurate understanding of asthma. Medikidz Explain Asthma Part 3 is the third installment of a series of books developed for children with asthma and their families in collaboration with Medikidz, a global organization that produces unique learning materials for children in a powerfully visual comic book format. It follows Savion, age 10, on an epic journey through Mediland, as he gets a firsthand view of the science behind asthma.
"Our goal for the series is to engage kids and help them better understand and manage their asthma as well as overcome challenges associated with this chronic health condition," said Stuart Loesch, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Meda. "We are committed to changing the patient landscape, by providing tools like Medikidz Explain Asthma for physicians to better connect with patients and families."
Asthma is a common respiratory condition that affects 6.8 million children in the U.S. alone,1 according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is characterized by difficulty breathing, wheezing, coughing and shortness of breath.
Medikidz comic books are written and reviewed by physician specialists to help families gain an accurate understanding of medical information. The action adventure world of its superhero characters helps explain illnesses and treatments to children. The Medikidz Explain Asthma series was developed in partnership with, and endorsed by, leading asthma and healthcare organizations.
"Medikidz Explain Asthma helps kids understand their asthma in a truly unique way, on a level they can understand and relate to. When kids have a better understanding about what's happening in their body, they begin to approach the way they manage their asthma in a whole new way," said Autumn Burnette, MD, Assistant Professor in the Division of Allergy and Immunology at Howard University Hospital. "They self-advocate more and become more of a partner in their care along with their healthcare provider. The series is a remarkable tool for educating and empowering kids with chronic asthma."
Healthcare providers can visit www.explainasthma.com to order their copies. Patients and caregivers can request a free copy directly from their provider.
The American Academy of Physician Assistants in Allergy, Asthma and Immunology undertook our first ever Employment and Salary Survey in August of 2015 during our annual conference in Chandler, Arizona. To our knowledge this was the first survey ever to target Physician Assistant (PA) and Nurse Practitioner (NP) providers that specialize in the asthma and allergy field. Throughout 2015 our Board of Directors and management team worked on a survey that would be easy to complete yet provide strong data to better understand the employment demographics in our field as well as information about compensation, benefits, vacation time and more. The data gathered is now presented in this comprehensive, downloadable report.
Members may receive a complimentary copy of the report by going to our members-only page. If you are not an association member and wish to purchase the report, you may do so by clicking the button below which will take you to our payment page at paypal. The fee for the report is $100. Once payment is made through paypal, you will receive an email with a link to download the report.
2017 Conference Information


text:
Daniel Giraud Elliot
|This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (March 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Daniel Giraud Elliot (March 7, 1835 – December 22, 1915) was an American zoologist.[1]
He was born in New York City on 7 March 1835.[2]
Elliot was one of the founders of the American Museum of Natural History in New York, of the American Ornithologists' Union and of the Société zoologique de France. He was also curator of zoology at the Field Museum in Chicago.
From 1869 to 1879 he was in London and established strong links to British ornithologists and naturalists.[3]
Elliot used his wealth to publish a series of sumptuous color-plate books on birds and animals. Elliot wrote the text himself and commissioned artists such as Joseph Wolf and Joseph Smit, both of whom had worked for John Gould, to provide the illustrations. The books included A Monograph of the Phasianidae (Family of the Pheasants) (1870–72), A Monograph of the Paradiseidae or Birds of Paradise (1873), A Monograph of the Felidae or Family of Cats (1878) and Review of the Primates (1913).
In 1890 he was President of the American Ornithologists Union.
In 1899, Elliot was invited to join the elite Harriman Alaska Expedition to study and document wildlife along the Alaskan coast.
The National Academy of Sciences awards the Daniel Giraud Elliot medal[4] "for meritorious work in zoology or paleontology published in a three- to five-year period. Established through the Daniel Giraud Elliot Fund by gift of Miss Margaret Henderson Elliot."
Selected publications[edit]
- Catalogue of a Collection of Birds Obtained by the Expedition into Somali-land (1897).
- The Gallinaceous Game Birds of North America, Including the Partridges, Grouse, Ptarmigan, and Wild Turkeys (1897).
- Catalogue of Mammals from the Olympic Mountains, Washington, with Descriptions of New Species (1899).
- Description of an Apparently New Species of Mountain Goat (1900).
- The Caribou of the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska (1901).
- The Deer Family (1902,[5] with Theodore Roosevelt, Theodore S. Van Dyke and A.J. Stone).
- Catalogue of Mammals Collected by E. Heller in Southern California (1904).
- The Land and Sea Mammals of Middle America and the West Indies (1904).
- A Check List of Mammals of the North American Continent, the West Indies and the Neighboring Seas (1905).
- A Catalogue of the Collection of Mammals in the Field Columbian Museum (1907).
- Review of the Primates, Volume I : Lemuroidea; Anthropoidea (Seniocebus to Saimiri) NY, 1912 Smithsonian Libraries
- ^ Chapman, Frank M. (January 1917). "Daniel Giraud Elliot". The Auk. 34 (1): 1–10.
- ^ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 (PDF). The Royal Society of Edinburgh. July 2006. ISBN 0 902 198 84 X.
- ^ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 (PDF). The Royal Society of Edinburgh. July 2006. ISBN 0 902 198 84 X.
- ^ "Daniel Giraud Elliot Medal", National Academy of Sciences.
- ^ The deer family in libraries (WorldCat catalog)
External links[edit]
- Works by or about Daniel Giraud Elliot at Internet Archive
- Works by Daniel Giraud Elliot, at Hathi Trust
- View works by Daniel Giraud Elliot online at the Biodiversity Heritage Library.


text:
David Jude Heyworth Law (born 29 December 1972), known professionally as Jude Law, is an English actor, film producer and director.He began acting with the National Youth Music Theatre in 1987, and had his first television role in 1989. After starring in films directed by Andrew Niccol, Clint Eastwood and David Cronenberg, he was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor in 1999 for his performance in Anthony Minghella's The Talented Mr. Ripley. In 2000, he won a Best Supporting Actor BAFTA Award for his work in the film. In 2003, he was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Actor for his performance in another Minghella film, Cold Mountain. He is also known for his role as Dr. John Watson in the Sherlock Holmes film series.In 2006, he was ranked as one of the top ten most bankable film stars in Hollywood. In 2007, he received an Honorary César and was named a Chevalier of the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres by the French governmentNot to be confused with Jennifer Lawrence who somehow got the nickname J Law contrary to Jude's existance.
open/close all folders
He appeared in
TV & Film
- The Tailor of Gloucester
- The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes
- Bent
- Gattaca
- Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
- eXistenZ
- The Talented Mr. Ripley
- Enemy at the Gates
- A.I.: Artificial Intelligence
- Road to Perdition
- Cold Mountain
- I Heart Huckabees
- Alfie
- Closer
- The Aviator
- Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
- A Series of Unfortunate Events
- All the King's Men
- The Holiday
- Sleuth
- The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
- Sherlock Holmes
- Repo Men
- Contagion
- Hugo
- Anna Karenina
- Rise of the Guardians
- Side Effects
- Dom Hemingway
- The Grand Budapest Hotel
- Fake American: Many of his roles.
- Mr. Fanservice: Tends to be in many "Sexiest Man Alive" list, especially during the Turn of the Millennium.
- Production Posse: Most famously with Anthony Minaghella.
- Protagonist Title: Many of his leading roles are the eponymous hero of the story.
- Shakespearian Actors: He began acting with the National Youth Music Theatre and been in many plays, including Hamlet and Henry V, ever since.
- Star-Making Role: In The Talented Mr. Ripley.
- Those Two Actors: Frequently co-star with Gwyneth Paltrow and Kate Winslet.
- What Could Have Been:
- Dropped out of the movie From Hell.
- Was originally considered for the role of Shinzon of Remus in Star Trek: Nemesis.
- He was considered for the role of Will Turner in Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl.
- Bryan Singer originally wanted him to play Zod in Superman Returns.
- He was originally was cast as Ozymandias in Watchmen, and was attached to the role late enough in pre-production that his likeness is clearly recognizable in the character's costume sketch◊. His reasons for dropping out remain unknown, and he was replaced by the then-relatively unknown Matthew Goode instead, in keeping with the idea that the story should be a bigger star than the actors involved. For the matter, he had also expressed interest in playing Rorschach.


text:
Alright, so many of you have known me for a while and have, therefore, witnessed my journey from an immature pre-teen into the immature near-adult that I now am. I am aware that members of this sight represent many different age groups, including a few members who are exceedingly old.
I now present you with my dilemma, with which I hope you shall render me aid: I don't want to get any older. As a matter of fact, I want to be younger, and, if possible, living in a different universe or dimension. Any comments, advice, and/or abominations to the space-time continuum will be much appreciated.


text:
- Report: #820308
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Primus Marketing
Primus Marketing26 North Main St. Southington, Connecticut United States of America
Primus Marketing Nick Saum Charles Ponzi would be proud Southington, Connecticut
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/09/2012 07:23 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Primus-Marketing/Southington-Connecticut-/Primus-Marketing-Nick-Saum-Charles-Ponzi-would-be-proud-Southington-Connecticut-820308. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Primus Marketing
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.


text:
DOJ's Inspector General just released a report of all the recommendations it made prior to September 15, 2015 that are not yet closed. As it explained in the release, the IG compiled the report in response to a congressional request, but they've posted (and will continue to post, every 6 months) the report for our benefit as well.
Specifically, we have posted a report listing all recommendations from OIG audits, evaluations, and reviews that we had not closed as of September 30, 2015. As you will see, most of the recommendations show a status of "resolved," which indicates that the Department of Justice has agreed with our recommendation, but we have not yet concluded that they have fully implemented it.
As that release made clear, most of the recommendations that have not yet been closed are not open, but resolved, which means DOJ has agreed with the IG's recommendation but has not fully implemented a fix for that recommendation.
Which leaves the "open" recommendations, which might include recommendations DOJ hasn't agreed to address or hasn't told the IG how they'll address. There are 20 open recommendations in the report, most of which date to 2014. That's largely because every single one of the 10 recommendations made in the 2014 report on National Security Letters remains open. Here are some of my posts on that report (one, two, three, four, five), but the recommendations pertain to not ingesting out-of-scope information, counting the NSL's accurately, and maintaining paperwork so as to be able to track NSLs. [Update: as the update below notes, the FBI response to the released report claimed it was responding, in whole or in part, to all 10 recommendations, which means the "open" category here means that FBI has not had time to go back and certify that FBI has done what it said.]
Three of the other still-open recommendations pertain to hiring; they pertain to nepotism, applicants for the civil rights division wanting to enforce civil rights laws (!), and the use of political tests for positions hiring career attorneys (this was the Monica Goodling report). Another still open recommendation suggests DOJ should document why US Attorneys book hotels that are outside cost limits (this pertains, ironically, to Chris Christie's travel while US Attorney).
The remaining 2 recommendations, both of which date to 2010, are of particular interest.
The OIG recommends that the FBI should issue guidance specifically directing FBI personnel that they may not use the practices known as hot number [classified and redacted] to obtain calling activity information from electronic communications service providers.
The first pertains to the IG Report on exigent letters. The report described (starting on PDF 94) how FBI contracted with two providers for "hot number" services that would let them alert the FBI when certain numbers were being used. FBI first contracted for the service with MCI or Verizon, not AT&T (as happened with most tech novelties in this program). The newly released version of the report make it clear that redactions are redacted for b1 (classification), b4 (trade secrets), b7A (enforcement proceedings), and b7E (law enforcement technique). At one point, then General Counsel now lifetime appointed judge Valerie Caproni said the practice did not require Pen Registers.
I find this practice — and FBI's longstanding unwillingness to forswear it — interesting for two reasons. First, most references to the practice follow "hot number" by a short redaction.
That suggests "hot number" may just be a partial name. Given that this section makes it clear this was often used with fugitives — just as Stingrays are often most often used — I wonder whether this involved "number" and "site." That's especially true since Company C (again, MCI or Verizon) also tracked whether calls were being made from a particular area code or [redacted], suggesting some location tracking function.
I'm also interested in this because "hot numbers" tracks the unauthorized "alert" function the NSA was using with the phone dragnet up until 2009. As you recall, NSA analysts would get an alert if any of thousands of phone numbers got used in a given day, none of which it counted as a contact-chaining session.
In other words, this practice might be related to one or both of these things. And 6 years later, the FBI doesn't want to forswear the practice.
The OIG recommends that the FBI seek to ensure that it is able to identify and document the source of facts provided to Congress through testimony and correspondence, and to the public.
This report (see one of my posts on it) reviewed why the FBI had investigated a bunch of peace and other advocacy groups as international terrorist groups dating back to 2004. ACLU had FOIAed some documents on investigations into Pittsburgh's peace community. In response, Patrick Leahy started asking for answers, which led to obvious obfuscation from the FBI. And as I noted, even the normally respectable Glenn Fine produced a report that was obviously scoped not to find what it was looking for.
Nevertheless, a key part of the report pertained to FBI's inability (or unwillingess) to respond to Leahy's inquiries about what had started this investigation or to explain where the sources of information for their responses came from. (See PDF 56) The FBI, to this day, has apparently refused to agree to commit to be able to document where the information it responds to Congress comes from.
I will have more to say on this now, but I believe this is tantamount to retaining the ability to parallel construct answers for Congress. I'm quite confident that's what happened here, and it seems that FBI has spent 6 years refusing to give up the ability to do that.
I didn't read it when I originally reported in the NSL IG report, but it, like most IG reports, has a response from FBI, which in this case is quite detailed. The FBI claims that it had fulfilled most recommendations well before the report was released.
The response to the open exigent letter recommendation is at PDF 224. It's not very compelling; it only promised to consider issuing a statement to say "hot number [redacted]" was prohibited.
The response to the 2014 report recommendations start on PDF 226. Of those, the FBI didn't say they agreed with one part of one recommendations:
In addition, with respect to the data requested with NSLs, FBI has taken out expansive language from manual models for NSLs (this includes an attachment the other discussion of which is redacted), but had not yet from the automated system.
As part of today's Senate Judiciary Hearing on DOJ OLC's decision to make DOJ's Inspector General ask nicely before it gets certain kinds of materials it needs to conduct its work, John Cornyn asked what changed in 2010 to make the FBI start pushing back against sharing information freely with the IG.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz responded,
I was not the Inspector General at that time, but my understanding is that the memos and decisions from the legal counsel at the FBI followed several OIG reviews of the handling of National Security Letters, Exigent Letters, and other hard-hitting OIG reviews, because there was no other change in the law, no policy change, no regulatory change…
Horowitz is suggesting that because Horowitz' predecessor, Glenn Fine, released reports that showed FBI abuse of national security programs, FBI started pushing back against sharing information. The claim is particularly interesting given that the Exigent Letters report, which was released in January 2010, significantly implicated FBI's General Counsel's office, including then General Counsel and now lifetime appointed judge (with Cornyn's backing) Valerie Caproni.
The suggestion is also interesting given that Fine resigned in 2010 after starting an investigation into the use ofSection 215 and PRTT. It took years before DOJ had a working Inspector General again, resulting in a long delay before Congress got another report on how the government was using the phone dragnet.
All of which is all the more troubling, given that Horowitz revealed that,
Just yesterday, I'm told, in our review of the FBI's use of the bulk telephony statute, a review that this committee has very much been interested in our doing, we got records with redactions, not for grand jury, Title III, or fair credit information, because those have been dealt with, but for other areas that the FBI has identified legal concerns about.
This is particularly troubling given that just weeks ago the USA Freedom Act mandated certain IG reviews of phone dragnet activities.
But the FBI is still obstructing such efforts.
I mentioned earlier that the FBI withheld information on the Bureau's use of phone dragnet tippers from DOJ's Inspector General long enough to make any review unusable for Congress' consideration before it passed USA F-ReDux.
That's important because of this passage from the Stellar Wind IG Report.
Another consequence of the Stellar Wind program and the FBI's approach to assigning leads was that many threat assessments were conducted on individuals located in the United States, including U.S. persons, who were determined not to have any nexus to terrorism or represent a threat to national security.402 These assessments also caused the FBI to collect and retain a significant amount of personal identification about the users of tipped telephone numbers and e-mail addresses. In addition to an individual's name and home address, such information could include where the person worked, records of foreign travel, and the identity of family members. The results of these threat assessments and the information that was collected generally were reported in communications to FBI Headquarters and uploaded into FBI databases.
The FBI's collection of U.S. person information in this manner is ongoing under the NSA's FISA-authorized bulk metadata collection. To the extent leads derived from this program generate results similar to those under Stellar Wind, the FBI will continue to collect and retain a significant amount of information about individuals in the United States, including U.S. persons, that do not have a nexus to terrorism or represent a threat to national security.
We recommend that as part of the [redacted] project, the Justice Department's National Security Division (NSD), working with the FBI, should collect addresses disseminated to FBI field offices that are assigned as Action leads and that require offices to conduct threat assessments. The information compiled should include whether individuals identified in threat assessments are U.S. or non-U.S. persons and whether the threat assessments led to the opening of preliminary or full national security investigations. With respect to threat assessments that conclude that users of tipped telephone numbers or e-mail addresses are not involved in terrorism and are not threats to national security, the Justice Department should take steps to track the quantity and nature of U.S. person information collected and how the FBI retains and utilizes this information. This will enable the Justice Department and entities with oversight responsibilities, including the OIG and congressional committees, to assess the impact this intelligence program has on the privacy interests of U.S. persons and to consider whether, and for how long, such information should be retained. (PDF 666-7/329-330)
After a preceding section talking about how many of the tippers to FBI — which, after all, may be two hops away from someone of interest — weren't all that useful, DOJ's IG (the current IG, Michael Horowitz's predecessor, Glenn Fine) noted how many Americans with no nexus to terrorism nevertheless have their names, home addresses, workplace, travel records, and family members' identities collected and stored in an FBI database, potentially for decades. And, we now know, those assessments would include a search for any previously-collected content, which the FBI could read without a warrant.
Fine recommended that FBI begin to track what happens with the Americans sucked up in PATRIOT-authorized dragnets.
But we can be virtually certain FBI chose not to heed that recommendation, because it hasn't heeded similar recommendations with NSLs, and because FBI refuses to track any of their other FISA-related activities.
And Horowitz has been very disciplined in following up on previous IG recommendations in reports that follow up on like topics, so that is likely one of the things he planned to investigate with his focus on the "receiving, processing, and disseminating [of] leads" from the phone dragnet.
The review will examine the FBI's procedures for receiving, processing, and disseminating leads the NSA develops from the metadata, as well as any changes that have been made to these procedures over time. The review will also examine how FBI field offices respond to leads and the scope and type of information field offices collect as a result of any investigative activity that is initiated. In addition, the review will examine the role the leads have had in FBI counterterrorism efforts
Frankly, because NSA had to curtail so much of what they were doing with the phone dragnet in 2009, there should be fewer Americans sucked up in the dragnet now then there was when Fine did his Stellar Wind review in 2008-09. Though if FBI continued to require an assessment of every new identifier, it would still result in a lot of innocent Americans having their lives unpacked and stored for 30 years by the FBI.
But those numbers will likely be higher — potentially significantly higher — under USA F-ReDux, because any given query will draw off of more kinds of information. More importantly, FBI is exempted from counting the queries it does on any database of call detail records obtained under the new CDR function.
(C) the number of search terms that included information concerning a United States person that were used to query any database of call detail records obtained through the use of such orders;
(A) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.—Paragraphs (2)(A), (2)(B), and (5)(C) of subsection (b) shall not apply to information or records held by, or queries conducted by, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This strongly suggests the data will come in through the FBI, be treated under FBI's far more permissive (than NSA's) minimization procedures, and searched regularly. Which likely means the privacy implications of innocent Americans sucked up into the dragnet will be far worse. And all that's before any of the analysis NSA will do on these query results.
There was no public consideration of the privacy impact of the innocent Americans sucked in under the CDR function during the USA F-ReDux debate (though I wrote about it repeatedly).
But if DOJ's IG intended to include past recommendations in its review of what FBI does with the phone dragnet data — which would be utterly consistent with past practice — that's one of the things this review, the review FBI stalled beyond the point when it could be useful, would have focused on.
For over a year, Congress has been working on a "reform" to Section 215 that it claims will rein in abusive government spying.
Also for about a year, DOJ's Inspector General has been trying to release a Report on Section 215 use up to 2009. That investigation first began 1,800 days ago.
DOJ has finally managed to release the report.
It confirms a number of things I have been reporting for years: that the government uses the provision to collect records that have nothing to do with phone records in bulk, the majority of which are now Internet records, definitely including URLs and probably including subject lines.
But the takeaway report is something else I've been reporting on for some time.
The government completely blew off a requirement imposed with the 2006 PATRIOT Act Reauthorization that the FBI (which is the only agency that's supposed to use Section 215) adopt minimization procedures specifically for Section 215. Even after FBI missed its September 2006 deadline by claiming it had Interim Procedures, FISC kept approving Section 215 orders, even including paragraphs that appear in every phone dragnet order claiming the government has met that statutory requirement. A year after DOJ's Inspector General pointed out FBI was violating the statute, FISC started imposing its own minimization procedures and reporting requirements (though not — as a court operating with more transparency might have done — denying orders). Finally, in March 2013, DOJ adopted minimization procedures (though it did not start actually complying with them until more than four months after Edward Snowden's leaks focused more attention on bulk 215 orders).
In other words, Congress imposed a mandate designed to protect innocent Americans' privacy in 2006. And DOJ blew that statutory mandate off for years. And FISC let it do so for years, approving order after order requiring FBI to have fulfilled that mandate. And only after 7 years (and some unexpected transparency) did DOJ start following the law.
These are the people Congress is rushing headlong to provide new authorities (including an Emergency provision that is designed to invite abuse): government agencies who simply refuse to follow Congressional mandates.
As I noted earlier, the House Judiciary Committee just released a new version of USA Freedom Act, which I've dubbed USA F-ReDux. I'll have a lot more to say about it, but I want to make two minor point about things that got taken out of Leahy's bill from last year.
First, last year's bill had minimization procedures tied to bulky Section 215 collection effectively requiring the government to destroy the data that had not been determined to be two hops from a target within a period of time.
(C) for orders in which the specific selection term does not specifically identify an individual, account, or personal device, procedures that prohibit the dissemination, and require the destruction within a reasonable time period (which time period shall be specified in the order), of any tangible thing or information therein that has not been determined to relate to a person who is—
(i) a subject of an authorized investigation;
(ii) a foreign power or a suspected agent of a foreign power;
(iii) reasonably likely to have information about the activities of—
(I) a subject of an authorized 21 investigation; or
(II) a suspected agent of a foreign power who is associated with a subject of an authorized investigation;
(iv) in contact with or known to—
(I) a subject of an authorized investigation; or
(II) a suspected agent of a foreign power who is associated with a subject of an authorized investigation,
Those minimization procedures resemble what we've seen from the minimization procedures FISC imposed on the phone dragnet, which probably means they also resemble what FISC was imposing in other cases. In the previous year (2013), FISC had imposed minimization procedures on almost 80% of all orders.
In other words, the clause basically required the government to do what the FISC was probably already forcing it to do in the majority of orders (which, in any case, permitted the government to keep, indefinitely, the records associated with people two hops out of someone whom the government had a traffic stop suspicion had ties to terror or spying).
Last year, however, the FISC modified fewer than 3% of orders, and at least one of those was probably a phone dragnet one. Perhaps the change means the government finally started complying with the requirement laid out in 2006 that it adopt minimization procedures (the impending Section 215 IG Report likely created an incentive to do that, as following the law on minimization was one of the recommendations Glenn Fine had made in 2008, so Michael Horowitz surely followed up on that recommendation; plus, the generally law-abiding James Baker assumed FBI's General Counsel role in this period). Perhaps it means the government stopped making bulky collections (though that is unlikely). But for some reason, the number of orders on which the FISC imposed minimization procedures and a report back fell off a cliff.
And now the requirement that the government adopt minimization procedures for bulky collection is gone from the bill.
I might be alarmed by that, but this year's bill does add a Rule of Construction clarifying that the FISA Court can impose additional minimization procedures on top of what the bill requires the government to adopt for Section 215. So it may be that if the FBI returns to its recidivist ways on minimization procedures, we'll see the number of modified orders spike again.
I'm more concerned about what happened on the Pen Register side.
Last year, the PRTT section added new "privacy" (not "minimization") procedures.
IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are in place to safeguard nonpublicly available information concerning United States persons that is collected through the use of a pen register or trap and trace device installed under this section. Such policies and procedures shall, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with the need to protect national security, include privacy protections that apply to the collection, retention, and use of information concerning United States persons.
Compare how squishy those privacy procedures are to the required Section 215 minimization procedures FBI blew off for years.
A) specific procedures that are reasonably designed in light of the purpose and technique of an order for the production of tangible things, to minimize the retention, and prohibit the dissemination, of nonpublicly available information concerning unconsenting United States persons consistent with the need of the United States to obtain, produce, and disseminate foreign intelligence information;
(B) procedures that require that nonpublicly available information, which is not foreign intelligence information, as defined in section 1801 (e)(1) of this title, shall not be disseminated in a manner that identifies any United States person, without such person's consent, unless such person's identity is necessary to understand foreign intelligence information or assess its importance; and
Rather than requiring the procedures minimize the retention and dissemination, the bill required only that privacy protections be applied. And there was no requirement limiting dissemination of non-foreign intelligence data.
But at least there were privacy procedures, right? Baby steps?
Last year's bill had, and this year's bill retains, a Rule of Construction (like that added to Section 215) that notes nothing limits FISC's power to impose additional minimization procedures.
(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection limits the authority of the court established under section 103(a) or of the Attorney General to impose additional privacy or minimization procedures with regard to the installation or use of a pen register or trap and trace device.
Which is all well and good, but FISC's authority to do so with PRTT has no statutory basis, unlike Section 215. And during both the 2004 initial application for the Internet dragnet and John Bates' 2010 reauthorization of it, the government made some fairly aggressive claims about FISC's impotence to do anything but rubber stamp applications. So this Rule of Construction may not have the same weight as that in Section 215.
Which is why I worry that this section was removed from the bill.
(3) COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT.—At or before the end of the period of time for which the installation and use of a pen register or trap and trace device is approved under an order or an extension under this section, the judge may assess compliance with the privacy procedures required by this subsection by reviewing the circumstances under which information concerning United States persons was collected, retained, or disseminated.
As the documents on the phone dragnet violations showed, unless FISC has and exercises the authority to ensure compliance with minimization procedures, the government will cheat (or, more charitably, not find systematic years-long violations staring them in the face). FISC seemed to recognize this when it imposed compliance reports on its minimization of Section 215 orders in recent years. But it won't have statutory authority to review assessment with these already-squishy "privacy procedures."
Footnote 147 of the DOJ IG Report on Stellar Wind (PDF 462-3) modifies a discussion of the discussions on March 6 and 7, 2004 in which Jack Goldsmith and Patrick Philbin informed David Addington and Alberto Gonzales that they could not reauthorize Stellar Wind — in spite of applying a relaxed standard of review — because the White House wanted them to affirm that John Yoo's November 2, 2001 memo had covered the program, yet Yoo's memo had not included all aspects of it (this likely pertains to the collection of Internet metadata from telecom switches, though it may also pertain to the collection on Iraqi targets).
After reporting Gonzales' claimed reaction to the meetings at which DOJ's lawyers told the White House the program was illegal, the report notes that Gonzales was lawyered up at his IG interview, but later provided further elaboration in writing.
Later on March 6, Goldsmith and Philbin went to the White House to meet with Addington and Gonzales to convey their conclusions that the [2 lines redacted] According to Goldsmith's chronology of these events, Addington and Gonzales "reacted calmly and said they would get back with us." Goldsmith told us that the White House was not worried that it was "out there," meaning that it was implementing a program without legal support.
On Sunday afternoon, March 7, 2004, Goldsmith and Philbin met again with Addington and Gonzales at the White House. According to Goldsmith, the White House officials informed Goldsmith and Philbin that they disagreed with Goldsmith and Philbin's interpretation of Yoo's memoranda and on the need to change the scope of the NSA's collection. Gonzales told us that he recalled the meetings of March 6 and March 7, 2004, but did not recall the specifics of the discussions. He said he remembered that the overall tenor of the meetings with Goldsmith was one of trying to "find a way forward."147
147 As noted above, Gonzales was represented by counsel during his interview with the OIG. Also present during the interview because of the issue of executive privilege was a Special Counsel to the President, Emmitt Flood. We asked Gonzales whether the President had been informed by this point in time of the OLC position regarding the lack of legal support for the program and [redacted]. Flood objected to the question on relevancy grounds and advised Gonzales not to answer, and Gonzales did not provide us an answer. However, when Gonzales commented on a draft of the report, he stated that he would not have brought Goldsmith and Philbin's "concerns" to the attention of the President because there would have been nothing for the President to act upon at this point. Gonzales stated that this was especially true given that Ashcroft continued to certify the program as to legality during this period. Gonzales stated he generally would only bring matters to the President's attention if the President could make a decision about them.
Remember the situation Gonzales would have been in. The interview (and probably, though not certainly, the review of the draft) would have taken place in fall to winter 2008, when Bush was still in office.
Thus, the interview would have happened during the period or just after DOJ IG conducted an investigation into what amounted to a CYA file Gonzales had carried around in his briefcase — documents and draft documents relating to all the illegal programs in which he had been involved, including his notes pertaining to the hospital confrontation over Stellar Wind. There's reason to believe he was referred for that investigation precisely because it was recognized as a CYA file and he was no longer regarded as loyal on surveillance issues.
In addition, at the time, too, DOJ was still considering whether to file charges against Gonzales for the US Attorney scandal. So it makes sense that Gonzales' retained lawyer, George Terwilliger, was there (and it is somewhat surprising that, given that John Ashcroft got away without cooperating, Terwilliger let him cooperate).
But then there is Emmet Flood.
Both before and after his tenure in the White House Counsel's office — where he was brought in to deal with the scandals of the late Bush Administration — Flood was (and remains) a partner at Williams & Connolly. And not just a partner. He was formally part of Dick Cheney's defense team when Patrick Fitzgerald was honing in on the Vice President for leaking Valerie Plame's identity, and Flood would remain involved in protecting Cheney even after moved onto the taxpayer dime.
Emmet Flood may have been there in the name of protecting Executive Privilege, but it was not Bush's privilege Flood was protecting.
So we learn that on March 6, 2004, Goldsmith and Philbin tell Gonzales and Addington that parts of Stellar Wind have never been legal. On March 7, 2004, Gonzales and Addington come back and tell OLC's lawyers they're wrong.
And when DOJ's IG asked Gonzales whether — in the interim day — he had informed the President about this, Cheney's defense lawyer pipes up and tells him not to answer. Given that Bush apparently learned new details of all this 4 days later when Comey and Robert Mueller would tell him directly, the answer is no (which is consistent with what Gonzales said when Cheney's lawyer wasn't present).
Which leaves the logical and thoroughly unsurprising conclusion — but one Cheney's taxpayer funded lawyer didn't want included in a legal document — Cheney (who is not a lawyer, nor does he have Article II authority directly) is the one who told Gonzales and Addington to dig in.
Update: Flood also had Gonzales refuse to answer a question about whether anyone had thought to include DOJ in the meeting with Congress.
I've finished up my working threads on the NSA, CIA, and FBI Section 702 minimization procedures. And they suggest that FBI has an identity crisis. Or rather, an inability to describe what it means by "identification of a US person" in unclassified form.
Both the NSA and CIA minimization procedures have some form of this definitional paragraph (this one is NSA's):
Identification of a United States person means (1) the name, unique title, or address of a United States person; or (2) other personal identifiers of a United States person when appearing in the context of activities conducted by that person or activities conducted by others that are related to that person. A reference to a product by brand name, or manufacturer's name or the use of a name in a descriptive sense, e.g., "Monroe Doctrine," is not an identification of a United States person.
Even though the FBI minimization procedures have a (briefer than NSA and CIA's) definitional section and gets into when someone counts as US person from a geographical standpoint, it doesn't have the equivalent paragraph on what they consider US person identifying information, which is central to minimization procedures.
Now, I might assume that this is just an oversight, something FBI forgot to incorporate as it was writing its own 702 minimization procedures incorporating what NSA has done.
Except that we know the FBI has suffered from this same kind of identity crisis in the past, in an analogous situation. As Glenn Fine described in the 2008 Inspector General Report on Section 215 (the one the successor for which has been stalled for declassification review for over 6 months), the FBI never got around to (and almost certainly still hasn't gotten around to, except under modifications from the FISA Court) complying with Section 215's requirement that it adopt minimization procedures specific to Section 215.
One holdup was disagreement over what constituted US person identifying information.
Unresolved issues included the time period for retention of information, definitional issues of "U.S. person identifying information," and whether to include procedures for addressing material received in response to, but beyond the scope of, the FISA Court order; uploading information into FBI databases; and handling large or sensitive data collections.
(Note, there's very good reason to believe FBI is still having all these problems, not least because several of them showed up in Michael Horowitz' NSL IG Report last year.)
One problem Fine pointed out is that the AG Guidelines adopted in lieu of real minimization procedures don't provide any guidance on when US identifying information is necessary to share.
When we asked how an agent would determine, for example, whether the disclosure of U.S. person identifying information is necessary to understand foreign intelligence or assess its importance, the FBI General Counsel stated that the determination must be made on a case-by-case basis.
While NSA's 702 SMPs do lay out cases when FBI can and cannot share US person identifying information (those are, in some ways, less permissive than CIA's sharing guidelines, if you ignore the entire criminal application and FBI's passive voice when it comes to handling "sensitive" collections), if the guidelines for what counts as PII are not clear — or if they're expansive enough to exempt (for example) Internet handles such as "emptywheel" that would clearly count as PII under NSA and CIA's SMPs, then it would mean far more information on Americans can be shared in unminimized form.
And remember, FBI's sharing rules are already far more lenient than NSA's, especially with regards to sharing with state, local, and other law enforcement partners.
Call me crazy. But given the FBI's past problems defining precisely this thing, I suspect they're still refusing to do so.
As I noted the other day, I'm working through documents submitted in EPIC's FOIA for PRTT documents (see all of EPIC's documents on this case here).
In addition to the documents released (the reports to Congress, the extensive reporting on the Internet dragnet), the government submitted descriptions of what appear to be two (possibly three) sets of documents withheld: documents pertaining to orders combining a PRTT and Section 215 order, and documents pertaining to a secret technique, which we'll call the Paragraph 31 technique. In this post I'll examine the "combined order" documents.
The Vaughn Index for this FOIA made it clear that a number of the documents Withheld in Full (WIF) pertained to orders combing the Pen Register and Section 215 (Business Record) authorities, as does this list from David Hardy's second declaration.
Footnotes 3, 4, and 5 all note that these documents have already been successfully withheld in the EFF's FOIA for Section 215 documents, and by comparing the page numbers in that Vaughn Index in that case, we can guess with some confidence that these orders are the following documents and dates:
As I'll show, this correlates with what we can glean from the DOJ IG Reports on Section 215.
I'm less certain about Document 12. Both the EFF and ACLU Vaughn Indices show a 10/31/06 document (it is 82C in the EFF Vaughn) that is the correct length, 4 pages, that is linked with another 10/31/06 document (see 82B and 84, for example). For a variety of reasons, however, I think we can't rule out Document 89S which appears only in the EFF FOIA (but not the ACLU FOIA), which is dated December 16, 2005 (intriguingly, the day after NYT exposed Stellar Wind), in which case the withheld portion might be the relevant 4 pages of a longer 16 page order.
Last week, a number of people hailed the further declassification of DOJ Inspector General's Report on FBI's use of Exigent Letters.
That enthusiasm is misplaced, however. What too few people noticed is the thankless work Charlie Savage did to identify what was newly declassified. He had FOIAed the IG Report, which is what set off the declassification review.
In fact, FBI redacted three things that had previously been visible. On page 55/PDF 68, it redacted the title, "Diagram 2.1: Calling Circle or "Community of Interest." On page 105/PDF 118 they redacted language indicating they use a certain kind of "language" to order what are probably also communities of interest. Finally, on page 207/PDF 220, FBI newly redacted the title, "Chart 4.3 Records for 10 Telephone Numbers Uploaded to FBI Databases With the Longest Periods of Overcollection."
So the NYT sued the FBI to declassify language that should be declassified, given everything we've learned about related programs subsequent to the Snowden leaks, and FBI responded by trying to pretend we don't know they were getting (and still get, per DOJ IG's most recently report) call chains from telecoms.
To be fair, FBI did declassify some new stuff. That includes:
About the most interesting declassification was a citation to a Carrie Johnson story, published well over a year before the IG Report came out, describing the collection on those 3 journalists. The IG Report invoked this language in the story…
Mueller called the top editors at The Washington Post and the New York Times to express regret that agents had not followed proper procedures when they sought telephone records under a process that allowed them to bypass grand jury review in emergency cases.
… as evidence to support a footnote, which (except for the reference to Johnson's article) had been unclassified, explaining,
In addition to the letter, Director Mueller called the editors of the two newspapers to express regret that the FBI agents had not followed proper procedures when they sought the reporters' telephone records.
That is, they had classified reference to a published news article as S/NF! (Though I suppose it is possible that the fact they were hiding is that Glenn Fine had to read the WaPo to figure out what happened here, because Mueller wasn't speaking directly to him.)
Congratulations to Carrie Johnson who I guess now classifies as a state secret!
I asked the Savage (and through him, NYT's lawyer, David McCraw) how the NYT felt about FBI classifying, rather than declassifying language in response to his suit, and he suggested NYT expects DOJ to pay them for their time. "We have incurred no outside counsel fees and anticipate that the government will be required to pay us for the time spent by in-house counsel."
Still, I think Savage (and FOIA requesters generally) should get finder's fees every time the government newly classifies stuff years later … impose some kind of fine for stupid overclassification.
Update: Corrected timing on Johnson story which came out in August 2008, so 17 months before the IG Report.
I've been covering the DOJ Inspector General's billion-day old review of Section 215.
If my calculation is correct, that report has been pending for 1,616 days.
Today, in a report on the most significant challenges faced by the government, the IG explains what happened to the review: it is caught up in declassification review.
Ongoing OIG work, such as our reviews of the Department's requests for and use of business records under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Reauthorization Act and the Department's use of pen register and trap-and-trace devices under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), also address privacy concerns implicated by the use of national security authorities to collect data. Although the OIG completed both of these reviews months ago, and we have provided classified briefings to Congress regarding them, we have been unable to release the classified reports to Congress or non-classified reports to the public because the classification review being conducted by the intelligence community, which includes the FBI, is still ongoing.
This is craziness! Congress is actively legislating on this topic … tomorrow! There's also the matter of the secret FBI PRTT program, that I strongly suspect is a location dragnet, which this report likely covers.
But the IC is suppressing a report that has been in the works for over 4 years with a slow declassification review?
Update: From Glenn Fine's original letter scoping out the review, here's some of what it includes.
It will examine the number of Section 215 applications filed from 2007 through 2009, how the FBI is using the tool today, and describe any reported improper or illegal uses of the authority. Our review also will examine the progress the FBI has made in addressing recommendations contained in our prior reports that the FBI draft and implement minimization procedures specifically for information collected under Section 215 authority.
We also intend to conduct a programmatic review of the FBI's use of its pen register and trap and trace authority under the FISA. That part of the review will examine issues such as how the FBI uses the authority to collect information, what the FBI does with the information it collects, and whether there have been any improper or illegal uses of the authority either reported by the FBI or identified by the OIG.
In addition to identifying any improper uses of these authorities (the report should provide some sense of how rigorous the First Amendment review is), it will certainly lay out how FBI has refused to implement minimization procedures are required by law and recommended in DOJ IG's last Section 215 report (we know this to be the case because the FISC is imposing minimization procedures itself, and requiring compliance reviews).
All that would be rather important to know before extending Section 215 for another 3 years.


text:
Founded on March 7, 1978, and known as Park Group until December 2004, Ciner Group; has started its commercial activities with the manufacture, sales and importation of automotive spare parts. During the second half of the 1980's, the Group has expanded its field of operations with domestic and foreign agricultural motor production projects, turnkey integrated facility enterprises, as well as the establishment and operation of textile industrial plants. Each year, Ciner Group's companies of various sectors are being placed among "Turkey's 500 Largest Industrial Establishments" announced annually by the Istanbul Chamber of Industry. Group's slogan "50 THOUSAND 50", refers to the objective of achieving a total labor force of 50,000 employees and the construction of 50 modern educational institutions. These institutions are being transferred to the Ministry of National Education to serve the needs of Turkish students across the country. Today, Ciner Group operates with the following 3 groups and various companies: Ciner Energy and Mining Group Ciner Media Group Ciner Commerce, Industry and Service Group Ciner Group is ranked among Turkey's highest tax paying groups every year, currently employs more than 9700 people.
Company list
Click to see entire companies


text:
Not sure if this has been discussed yet; I'm wondering everyone's thoughts on the lack of cap space needed to sign the incoming rookie class?? Before signing Morrah, we has 1.1 million in cap space and I'd assume we'll need 5-6 million for actual number of rookies drafted. I know it's not a ton of space that has to be created (hell the cowboys got $20 million plus cleared) but I don't want to sacrifice long term success for short term roster flexibility.
I'm thinking a Justin smith extension would help and then looking at either/both Carlos Rogers and J Goodwin's deals as potential cuts. I could see some other smaller moves, but think these could be 2 more noticeable moves.
What are your thoughts on how they'll get under?


text:
- Report: #518441
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Realty Trade TimeShare fraud
Realty Trade TimeShare fraud14 E Washington Street #306 Orlando, Florida United States of America
Realty Trade TimeShare fraud They promise to return money if viable buyers are not found in six months. Not true no buyers no refunds. They should good but do not deliver. Yes, a fraud in the true sense. Orlando, Florida
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: 100% Client Satisfaction Committment
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This company promises to return you money if they do not sell your time share. Lie
They don't sell you property, they do not supply a real list of buyers, they do not return your money.
I fell for their promise - I needed to sell my property and recoup my investment, but they did deliver.
I would like to let other know so they do not fall for this deal. They are very good at sales.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/02/2009 10:36 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Realty-Trade-TimeShare-fraud/Orlando-Florida-32801/Realty-Trade-TimeShare-fraud-They-promise-to-return-money-if-viable-buyers-are-not-found-518441. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Realty Trade TimeShare fraud
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
100% Client Satisfaction Committment
AUTHOR: RT Escalated Claims - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, November 12, 2009POSTED: Thursday, November 12, 2009
By filing a report with the Attorney General, or any other regulatory agency, it will minimize the possibility of receiving a resolution for any grievances due to the unwillingness to allow our staff to settle your complaint.
Please email firstname.lastname@example.com with any concerns about your account and your grievances will be properly addressed.
Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.


text:
My 2 month old drinks 5 oz every 3 hrs
i think by this age (mine is also two months old) they should be getting 16-18oz per day of formula? but i'm no doctor...
i have to supplement with formula and i was told to hold the baby upright when feeding (As best as you can) so they have to work for the food instead of gravity pulling the formula into their mouth...also stretch out the duration of each feeding. pause and burp every so often to allow them to get the signal of fullness. It's impressive how well this works!
Married: 1/13/2012
Malcolm Jacob born July 15, 2013!
yeah its normal.. mine eats 4-5 ounces every 3 hours... i think youre suppose to times their weight by 2 and thats the minimum they should be getting per day and times it by 2.5 and thats the maximum.
Married my best friend March 8th 2013
DD born July 8th 2013
DS due June 18th 2015
My baby drinks 4 oz. every 2 1/2 to 3 hours. At her 2 months doctor visit. The doctor said her weight and height are normal. I should keep doing what I am doing. I also give breast milk. But, that is not that much. As I do not produce very much.
Me (45) DH (53) 2 IVF's & 15 IUI's TTC#2 IUI
Ashley born 07/12/13 7th IUI
Angel babies 12/5/11 @ 11 wks. & 3/8/14 @ 9 1/2 wks.


text:
Share < br />this article:
Jennifer Lawrence at 'Hunger Games' Premiere
Gabrielle Chung
| March 12, 2012 - 10:20 pm
Share < br />this article:
View Full Size
Return to Story
Hunger Games
Jennifer Lawrence
Recommended for you
Jennifer Lawrence Sold Her Starter Home for $1.15 Million
Jennifer Lawrence Named World's Highest-Paid Actress by Forbes
First Images of Jennifer Lawrence and Christ Pratt in Sci-fi Romance 'Passengers' Arrive
Here's Where Jennifer Lawrence Lived Before She Was Famous
'Fappening' Hacker Gets Six Months in Prison
In Honor of Shark Week, Here's 8 Celebs Who Have Literally Swam with Sharks
Around The Web
Album Review: The Glorious Comeback Miracle of Britney Spears' 'Glory'
Taylor Swift and Tom Hiddleston Have Hit Yet Another Relationship…
Prince William on Princess Diana: 'I Still Miss My Mother Everyday'
The Kardashians Accused of 'Deceptive Marketing' as Kim Kardashian Uses…
Nicole Kidman Reunites with Estranged Daughter Bella Cruise
Sign Up For The Latest Celebuzz News
Thank you for signing up for our newsletter. You will receive a confirmation shortly.
Sign Up
Top Photos
All »
Justin Bieber and Sofia Richie Reunite to Celebate Her 18th Birthday
Mila Kunis' Baby Bump Leads Today's Star Stightings
'Walking Dead': Not Even Jeffrey Dean Morgan Knew Who Negan Killed in the Season 6 Finale
Prince William on Princess Diana: 'I Still Miss My Mother Everyday'
Gigi and Bella Hadid Flash Major Skin During a Sister Night Out Together
Jay Z Blocks Overzealous Fan From Taking Selfie with Beyoncé
You'll Love
Jennifer Lawrence Sells Starter Home
MTV VMAs Performers Announced
Tour Rihanna's $22 Million Home


text:
Newcastle United Message Board
you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
More drivel on ITV tonight Jan 5th. So called family, self money making promotion. If they did respect Gazza they wouldn't be on there in the first place.
A lad with a serious mental problem--how low can family and TV sink. I've been onto ITV with my personal blast--you guys should do the same.Sort: Newest | Oldest | Most Replied Expand all replies
Alan, we are fed vomit inducing programmes on a daily basis, Big Brother, X Factor and other 'let's laugh at the loonies' shows. This Gazza thing is just another one to get us chomping on our popcorn, clapping like seals and enjoying the entertainment. The only reason the Gazza programme is on this week is because they haven't found a 14 foot tall woman, with a 14 foot long tumor or a young kid in China with 4 heads to film.
Do what I and anyone else with more than one braincell does..........don't watch Television.
- 2 Replies to boddie
He clearly has serious psychological problems combined with the misfortune of having been born into his own family + having met J5B & Terry Venables.. but he's had enough help and advice over the years and abused his position of having a lot of luck --As for the press taking advantage of him - he has always thought that everyone had to be entertained by his antics.. read in his book about smashing TV sets etc.. on the plane whilst travelling back with the England team. Anyone who didn't play along was abused by him... official and players.. also writing the foreword in books about gangsters in Newcastle...he never wanted to take responsibility for anything .. only his own ego and childish mentailty (part of his physchological condition).
I've heard enough of him. The more needy cases than him inside and outside of football and please don't compare him with Bobby Robson
I've been thinking about that one, boddie. Don't agree about the X-Factor. (brief cough)


text:
In Booming Brazil, the University System Expands, With Mixed Success
São Paulo, Brazil
The biggest higher-education expansion in the history of Brazil has added campuses in dozens of cities and towns throughout this vast nation over the past few years. But for every person celebrating new classrooms in once-ignored regions, there's...
This content is available exclusively to Chronicle subscribers
Already a subscriber?
Log in now
Not a subscriber yet?
Subscribe now for instant access to this article and thousands of others, data tables, and interactive charts — all available exclusively for Chronicle subscribers. Plus your subscription includes weekly print or digital delivery of The Chronicle and The Review and the Chronicle iPad® Edition.Subscribe Today


text:
Sheri Wagner – Babe of the Day
Meet Sheri -- A beach bum babe from Boynton Beach, Florida.
Meet Sheri -- A beach bum babe from Boynton Beach, Florida.
Anna Cherry is a model, blogger, and gamer who promises to "make your blood boil, one way or another." She was right.
Former Playboy Playmate Crystal McCahill is a 29-year-old model and actress who lives in Chicago. While it's been four years since Crystal was Playboy's featured woman, McCahill has remained a big part of the Playboy family by functioning as a representative for the brand...
Meet Brittney Lynn Shumaker, an 18-year-old model from Tampa, Florida.
Marisa is a 28-year-old babe from Boston, MA, but these days she's spending a whole lot of time in New York. That's where our offices are, Marisa. Just FYI.
Megan is a 23-year-old model from Louisiana who got her start at a Baton Rouge Hooters, and we love stories that start at Hooters.
Aryka is a Playboy model and full-time student from South Bend, Indiana.
Both sexy and classy, Sarah Clayton is a 26-year-old model from Drums, Pa. She's already appeared in the pages of Playboy, Maxim and Men's Health, so you may have already seen her...
Meet Isabella David, a 23-year-old model from New York with a background in theater and dance.
This French-American beauty has been modeling for more than five years, and she also works as an actress.
When we first saw this picture of Amy she reminded us of Kristy Swanson, the original 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer.' We had a really big crush on Kristy Swanson. Apparently Amy gets that a lot.


text:
Mammogram (cont.)
Melissa Conrad Stöppler, MD
Melissa Conrad Stöppler, MD, is a U.S. board-certified Anatomic Pathologist with subspecialty training in the fields of Experimental and Molecular Pathology. Dr. Stöppler's educational background includes a BA with Highest Distinction from the University of Virginia and an MD from the University of North Carolina. She completed residency training in Anatomic Pathology at Georgetown University followed by subspecialty fellowship training in molecular diagnostics and experimental pathology.
William C. Shiel Jr., MD, FACP, FACR
Dr. Shiel received a Bachelor of Science degree with honors from the University of Notre Dame. There he was involved in research in radiation biology and received the Huisking Scholarship. After graduating from St. Louis University School of Medicine, he completed his Internal Medicine residency and Rheumatology fellowship at the University of California, Irvine. He is board-certified in Internal Medicine and Rheumatology.
In this Article
- Mammogram facts
- What is a mammogram?
- Does a mammogram hurt?
- When should I get my first mammogram, and what are the breast cancer screening guidelines?
- What are the risks of mammography?
- What if I have breast implants?
- How do I prepare for a mammogram?
- How is a mammogram performed?
- How will I receive the results of my mammogram??
- What if my mammogram is abnormal?
- How much does a mammogram cost?
- Find a local Doctor in your town
Does a mammogram hurt?
During a mammogram the breasts are placed on a firm flat panel and a gentle, but firm pressure is applied to the breast with another panel, resulting in compression of the breast between the two panels. This can lead to some temporary discomfort that lasts only for a few seconds.
When should I get my first mammogram, and what are the breast cancer screening guidelines?
Various organizations have differing recommendations regarding the timing and frequency of mammography.
- The American Cancer Society recommends that a woman obtain her first baseline mammogram at the age of 45 and receive yearly mammograms through age 54, followed by mammograms every 2 years for women 55 and older.
- The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends mammograms every other year starting at age 50 and extending through age 74.
- Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American College of Radiology recommend yearly mammograms starting at age 40. Women who are at high risk for developing breast cancer may need to obtain mammograms earlier than these recommendations and at more frequent intervals.
What are the risks of mammography?
Because X-ray procedures use radiation, there is some small risk of radiation side effects to the body. The amount of radiation that is administered in mammography is exceptionally low and is approved by national and international regulatory agencies as well as the National Department of Health and Human Services. In fact, the average radiation exposure from a mammogram is less than what one would receive as a passenger on a transcontinental jet flight. However, patients who are pregnant or may be pregnant are advised to notify their requesting practitioner and radiology staff, because radiation can pose a risk to the developing fetus.
What if I have breast implants?
You should inform the mammography facility that you have breast implants at the time you make your appointment. Breast implants can also make the traditional images obtained in mammography more difficult to interpret, and mammography should be performed by a center with experience in performing mammography on patients with breast implants for best results.
How do I prepare for a mammogram?
A mammogram does not require special preparation. Women who are still having menstrual periods may find it more comfortable not to schedule a mammogram in the week prior to the expected period when breasts may be tender.
Antiperspirants, deodorants, and powders should not be worn during mammography and should be removed prior to the procedure, as these substances can make interpretation of the results more difficult. Antiperspirants can cause the images to appear foggy, and powders can sometimes simulate the appearance of microcalcifications (an abnormal finding that is sometimes associated with breast cancer).
Women's Health
Find out what women really need.


text:
Travel Book Shop: UN
Too late for the Travel Book Shop
Advertising Agency: Wirz/BBDO Switzerland
Creative Director: Matthias Freuler
Art Director: Iwan Von Rickenbach
Copywriter: Tom Zürcher
Illustrator: Iwan Von Rickenbach
Strategic Planner: Gordon Nemitz
Published:May 2009
11 comments
GuestMay 08, 2009 - 10:24
BRAD OWEN says:
BRAD OWEN says:
why there is no travel book shop in australia? expand, pls!
big ad, monsta's, congratulation! is there any more?
BOOBJOB LOOBCANNONMay 08, 2009 - 11:08
Like ivan I didn't get this until VF pointed it out.
We're going to need more lube.
Crystal ClearMay 09, 2009 - 12:10
great way to say "learn where you're travelling to before you go"


text:
Military public affairs officers, civilian officials and contract professionals manage communications during deployed operations overseas, for domestic community and media relations and other situations. They often work under challenging conditions, which is why specialized skills are required for communicators working on behalf of our armed forces and Department of Defense.
The Accreditation in Public Relations + Military Communication (APR+M) is an enhanced certification from the well-established APR. Candidates for APR+M must demonstrate a mastery of the Accredited in Public Relations (APR) KSAs plus additional joint public affairs topics.
To get started, visit:
For more information on APR+M, contact:


text:
Dallas Landmark Mt. Vernon On 10 Premier Acres ...
- 5 Beds
- 5.3 Baths
- 10,511 SqFt
- 10.00 Acres
Dallas, TX
Dallas Landmark Mt. Vernon On 10 Premier Acres Overlooking White Rock Lake. 10,51...
We're here to Help! Give One of Our EXPERTS a Call @ 866.761.5217
Are you dreaming of owning a home on a lake? Do you enjoy fishing, boating, bird watching or just sitting by the shore watching the sun go down? Lake homes in the Dallas - Fort Worth area are a great investment both for your own enjoyment (such as those listed above), and if you plan to resell or rent your house in the future.
Neighborhoods with lake homes, such as Twin Mill Farms in Saginaw, offer a great lake home experience with community living. For a more luxury, exclusive experience, larger lake homes are located throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth metro as well. Read More
Questions about buying a Waterfront Home? Give our experts a call at 214-306-5150 or 817-509-1400
|All Listings
|Under $100,000
|$100,000 - $200,000
|$200,000 - $300,000
|$300,000 - $400,000
|$400,000 - $500,000
|$500,000 - $600,000
|$600,000 - $700,000
|$700,000 - $800,000
|$800,000 - $900,000
|$900,000 - $1,000,000
|Over $1,000,000
Dallas, TX
Dallas Landmark Mt. Vernon On 10 Premier Acres Overlooking White Rock Lake. 10,51...
Flower Mound, TX
Extraordinary Property Situated On 2+ Acres In The Luxury Gated Community Of The L...
Dallas, TX
French Country Estate. Conceived And Executed By Architect Fusch-serold And Builde...
Highland Park, TX
Rare Waterfront Property Overlooking Exall Lake On Scenic Lakeside Drive. Located...
Highland Park, TX
Iconic Highland Park Estate! Built In 1918 And Designed By Hal Thomson. Situated O...
Rockwall, TX
High Gate Equestrian.. An Unimaginable Equestrian Lifestyle In The City. A Vision ...
Quinlan, TX
Astonishing 7000 Sqft Home On 220 Acres! Just 40 Min From Dallas, This 8 Bedroom, ...
Fort Worth, TX
Situated On A Secluded Cove Off The Banks Of Eagle Mountain Lake Just 30 Minutes F...
Plano, TX
One Of The Most Significant Residential Estates In Dallas! Designed By Architect F...
Granbury, TX
Impressive 72 Acre Lake Front Estate Combines The Best Of Both Worlds For Equestri...
Heath, TX
Only 30 Minutes From Downtown Dallas! Chateau Versailles On Lake Ray Hubbard. Phen...
Glen Rose, TX
Located A Short 90 Minutes From Downtown Dallas And Minutes From Picturesque Glen ...
Owning a home on a lake is not just great for personal and family recreation. Owning a home close to the water can actually decrease your heating and cooling bills throughout the year. Areas close to water are cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter.
Lake homes are often worth more than homes that are not near water. If you decide to sell or rent your home in the future, you will be able to command more for the property. In a down market, resell values are influenced by luxury amenities like lakes and pools. Being on a lake can make the difference between selling a home quickly and sitting on your piece of real estate for an extended period.
Users may not reproduce or redistribute the data found on this site. The data is for viewing purposes only. Data is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed accurate by the MLS or NTREIS.
Listing information last updated on August 27th, 2016 at 8:15am CDT.