text:
إرفنج ضد ليبستدات
Defense Documents
David Irving, Hitler and Holocaust Denial: Electronic Edition, by Richard J. EvansTable of Contents
|(b) Use of gas cham... >
|(e) Conclusion >>
(a) Numbers of Jews killed
1. Until the late 1980s, Irving paid little attention to the numbers of Jews killed during the Second World War. In 1986, for example, while confessing that he thought 'the six million figure is probably marginally exaggerated', Irving described the minimal figure of 100,000 as being put forward by a 'school of thought' that was 'right out at the fringe', and added that 'I have to admit that I haven't examined the Holocaust in any detail.'1 Within a couple of years, however, he was declaring himself to be an expert on the subject. In his evidence to the second Zündel trial in Canada in 1988, Irving was asked to comment on the following statement (put to him by the defence lawyer): 'If the "Holocaust" is represented as the allegation of the extermination of 6 million Jews during the Second World War as a direct result of official German policy of extermination (sic), what would you say to that thesis?' Irving replied:
I am not familiar with any documentary evidence of any such figure as 6 million...it must have been of the order of 100,000 or more, but to my mind it was certainly less than the figure which is quoted nowadays of 6 million. Because on the evidence of comparison with other similar tragedies which happened in the Second World War, it is unlikely that the Jewish community would have suffered any worse than these communities.2
2. Since making this statement in 1988, Irving has rarely deviated from his attempt to minimise the number of Jews killed by the Nazis in the Second World War in order to establish a moral and statistical equivalence with the numbers of Germans and others killed by the Allies. As he himself said in 1996, 'cutting the Holocaust down to its true size makes it comparable with the other crimes of World War II'.3
3. This applies not just to gassing and extermination camps, but also to the mass shootings carried out by the Security Service and Security Police task forces, the Einsatzgruppen. In his evidence to the second Zündel trial in 1988, Irving cast doubt, for example, on the reports filed by task force leaders giving numbers of Jews shot by their forces. 'I don't trust the statistics they contain', he said. 'Soldiers who are out in the field doing a job or murderers who are out in the field doing a job, they don't have time to count.' Each leader, he suggested, submitted reports whose aim was to 'show he's doing a jolly good job', and by inference, therefore, seriously exaggerated or even invented the numbers killed. 'Statistics like this are meaningless', Irving said. 'I'm suggesting', he continued, 'it is possible that at the time some overzealous SS officer decided to put in a fictitious figure in order to do Heinrich Himmler a favour.' This of course is pure speculation, unsupported by any documentary evidence. This is characteristic of Irving's methods in disposing of inconvenient documents. If a document does appear which Irving is unable to suggest is not genuine, or in some way unreliable, such as a memorandum from Himmler to Hitler in which 300,000 Jews are referred to in 1942 as having been exterminated, Irving says he is 'unhappy about it because it is such an unusual, isolated document'.4 But of course, it is only 'isolated' because Irving has dismissed or ignored all the other documentary evidence which points in the same direction: there is no genuine documentary warrant at all for this remark.
4. A particularly clear view of Irving's stance can be gained from the plate sections of two of his most recent books. Between pages 506 and 507 of the 1991 edition of Hitler's War, the following illustration captions occur in sequence:
At the end of November 1941, on Hitler's orders, the railroading of the remaining Jews out of Germany to "the east" begins. In Riga, Latvia, SS officers plunder and liquidate the local Jewish population, machine-gunning them into pits. German army officers secure, too late, orders from Hitler's headquarters that the mass shootings are to stop. A trainload of five thousand Jews from Berlin arrives in the middle of the massacre; they too are shot to death although Himmler telephones (right) to Heydrich the Führer's ruling that they are not to be liquidated.5
A rare original photograph shows the next trainload, of 1,200 Jews from Stuttgart, leaving their passenger train at Riga on December 4, 1941. Except for one uniformed SD officer near the third open carriage door, the escorts are all elderly German police officers, with two Latvian police in the right foreground.
SLAVE LABOUR. On June 26, 1944, a high flying Allied reconnaisance plane photographs the entire Auschwitz complex - the gigantic I.G.Farben synthetic rubber and oil plant at Monowitz, the first concentration camp built at Auschwitz (Oswiecim) itself, and the huge subsequent slave labour camp ("Auschwitz II") erected at nearby Birkenau. In the spring of 1942, after the Wannsee Conference, the Reich Justice Ministry briefs officials including State Secretary Roland Freisler. "The Führer has repeatedly declared...that he wants the Solution of the Jewish Problem postponed until after the war is over."6
FIRESTORM. In July 1943 British bombers devastate the German port of Hamburg. Forty-eight thousand people die in the devastating holocaust.
5. The last-named caption accompanies no fewer than three photographs spread over two entire pages; one of them shows a dead child clutching the body of an adult. By contrast, there are no pictures of concentration or extermination camp inmates or victims, nor of any of the shootings. The only picture of the Nazis' Jewish victims is of the train at Riga, an orderly scene of passenger carriages and people handing luggage out of the windows; no obvious brutality, no herding, no whips; Irving also neglects to mention in any of his writings the well-known fact that most transports of Jews to the East were in cattle trucks, whose passengers were crowded together without food or water for several days in conditions so bad that many died; on reaching the camps, they were frequently brutally assaulted by the guards.7
6. While Irving's presentation of photographic evidence on the Jewish victims of Nazism is confined to the single illustration of the railway station at Riga, he reproduces between pages 666 and 667 no fewer than six photographs of the bombing of Dresden, covering four whole pages. The caption reads:
Dresden, February 1945. Huge funeral pyres are erected behind police cordons in the city center, and the air raid victims are cremated, five hundred or a thousand at a time. Over one hundred thousand people have died. Previous page: Photographed after the horrific British and American air raid of February 13 and 14, 1945, Dresden is a roofless ghost city. There are no longer enough living to bury the dead.8
7. On the very next page there is a colour photograph of another bombing raid, captioned 'The British air offensive continues. Twenty-seven thousand die as Pforzheim is engulfed in a firestorm.' In this section too, as in all the others, there is not a single photograph of anyone killed by the Nazis, unless one includes high German officials such as Admiral Canaris who belonged to the resistance.
8. In Nuremberg: The Last Battle, published in 1996, the plate section, between pages 182 and 183, includes the following pictures and captions on facing pages: 'Punished...Snapshots from a German soldier's photo album. The daily routine of a cruel warfare in the Balkans. A German soldier is found mutilated. The German troops take reprisals, stringing up the menfolk in the village, like washing on a line - one by one, a chair kicked away beneath each victim and then painful death by strangulation. For crimes like these, German generals are executed at Nuremberg.' '...and Unpunished. No Allied general is ever called to account for the appalling fire-raids on Japan (above) or Dresden (Left and below). In each of these 1945 raids about a hundred thousand innocent civilians are burned alive in what is only now universally recognized as a crime against international law.' It is worth adding that one of the photographs on the page covering the 'cruel warfare' in the Balkans shows two unmistakably Jewish men with long beards and dark coats and hats, suggesting that the atrocities were committed by Jews.
9. The illustration captions in Irving's recent books therefore clearly constitute an attempt to establish an equivalence between the Nazi extermination of the Jews, which is minimised, sanitised or in a number of its key features completely ignored, and the Allied bombing of German cities. Auschwitz-Birkenau is described as a slave labour camp; only a relatively small-scale massacre of Jews in Riga is admitted. A similar equivalence is asserted by the illustration captions between other war crimes for which German military officers were condemned at the Nuremberg Trial, and other actions of the Allies and resistance movements in German-occupied Europe. Indeed, the tendency in these illustrations is strongly to suggest that the Allies' actions were more criminal, and less defensible, than those of the Germans. While the bombing of Dresden is said (incorrectly) to be 'universally recognized as a crime against international law', there is no statement to the same or equivalent effect about the crimes of the Nazis, though the verdict of guilty on them passed at the various trials of the International Military Tribunal after the war are still valid in international law. Irving concedes some of these, such as the shootings, but denies Hitler was responsible for them, and minimises them in comparison to what he portrays as the far greater crimes of the Allies.
10. Irving's description of the bombing raid on Hamburg as a 'holocaust' is repeated on page 440 of his book Goebbels: Mastermind of the 'Third Reich' (published in 1996). Not only does he rely in these descriptions on an explicit or implicit minimization of the number of Jews killed by the Nazis, he also postulates an equivalence by exaggerating the number of Germans killed by the Allies in bombing raids. Irving's work on Dresden deserves separate treatment on its own (see Part IV, Section (b) [sic] , below); here two other examples will suffice to illustrate the point.
11. On page 441 of Goebbels, he describes the number of those killed in the bombing raid on Hamburg on 27-28 July 1943 as 'nearly fifty thousand'; in 1989, he put it far higher, claiming that while 74,000 people had died at Auschwitz, 'nearly twice as many died in the July 1943 RAF attack on Hamburg'.9 In fact, all these estimates are inflated; the Hamburg air defence reported that 31,647 dead had been found, and other official German estimates of the time put the overall total at 34,000 or 35,000. The postwar estimate of 41,800 given by the Hamburg authorities is regarded by some experts as too high, while the amateur military historian Martin Middlebrook's figure of 44,600 has no basis in any identifiable source at all. The probable number, therefore, is between 35,000 and 40,000; Irving's wildly varying but invariably categorical statements that 48,000, nearly 50,000 or nearly twice 74,000, and deliberately inflated claims designed to establish an equivalence with his minimized statistics of Jewish deaths at the hands of the Nazis. They have no basis in documentary evidence or historical fact.10
12. There are even more explicit examples of Irving's attempts to show that Allied killings of German civilians were a greater crime than German killings of Jews. The same tactic of inflating the numbers involved in the former and minimising the numbers involved in the latter is particularly clearly visible in a speech delivered in Toronto on 8 November 1992, when Irving estimated the numbers who 'died' in Auschwitz ('most of them from epidemics', he said) as 100,000. 'Around one hundred thousand dead in that brutal slave labour camp.' Around 25,000 were killed by shooting or hanging, according to German radio reports from Auschwitz received and decrypted by the British, he added. He continued:
Twenty-five thousand killed, if we take this grossly inflated figure to be on the safe side: That is a crime; there is no doubt. Killing twenty-five thousand in four years - 1941, 1942, 1943, and 1944 - that is a crime; there is no doubt. Let me show you a picture of twenty-five thousand people being killed in twenty-five minutes. Here it is, in my book, a vivid picture of twenty-five thousand people being killed in twenty-five minutes by the British (in February 1945) in Pforzheim, a little town where they make jewellery and watches in Baden, Germany. Twenty-five thousand people were being burned alive...That is what it looks like when twenty-five thousand civilians are being burned alive in twenty-five minutes. One person in four, in twenty-five minutes. One person in four in that town. As I said when I was speaking in Kitchener yesterday, it is as though somebody came to Kitchener, a town of about a hundred thousand people, and killed one person in four in twenty-five minutes. That too is a crime. Twenty-five minutes! In Auschwitz it was a crime committed over four years. You don't get it spelled out to you like that. Except by us, their opponents. When you put things into perspective like that, of course, it diminishes their Holocaust - that word with a capital letter.....
13. Yet, Irving went on, spelling out this equivalence had led to a massive campaign against him. 'Anybody who wants to analyse any part of the Holocaust story is dismissed and smeared as an anti-Semite or at the other end of the scale, a "pro-Hitler apologist("), a "Nazi apologist"...'11
14. 'Analyse' here is a synonym for 'refute' or 'deny', words which Irving was careful to avoid in this particular context. Irving's almost incantatory repetition of the figures 'twenty-five thousand' and 'twenty-five minutes', mentioned in this passage respectively four times and five times, compared with his figure of twenty-five thousand for Auschwitz ('grossly inflated'), mentioned only twice, left no room for doubt about which crime he considered the greater. In fact, quite apart from the gross minimization of the Auschwitz figures, Irving's equivalence does not stand up to examination because of his wild exaggeration of the number of deaths caused by the Pforzheim raid, which was estimated in a report of the Statistical Office of the City of Pforzheim in 1954 not as 25,000 or 27,000, as Irving claims, but as 17,600.12
15. In recent years, Irving has deployed a range of arguments to buttress his minimal estimates for the numbers of Jews killed by the Nazis. In Nuremberg: The Last Battle (London, 1996), he claims that the Auschwitz death books give 46,000 names, dying mainly from disease.13 Citing British decrypts of German code messages from Auschwitz to Berlin, Irving has suggested on a number of occasions that some 25,000 Jews may have died in Auschwitz by killing, the rest from disease, the cause given in most of the reports.14 On occasion, he has gone so far as to claim that all the Jews who died in Auschwitz died from disease: 'Probably 100,000 Jews died in Auschwitz', he said in 1993, 'but not from gas chambers, they died from epidemics.'15 Indeed, Irving actually claims that the official history of British Intelligence during the Second World War, by the late Professor Sir Harry Hinsley,
states...that upon analysis of the daily returns of the Auschwitz concentration camp, it becomes completely plain that nearly all of the deaths, nearly all of the deaths, were due to disease. The others were by execution, by hanging, and by firing squad. There is no reference, and I'm quoting this page, there is no reference whatever to any gassings. So why hasn't this extraordinary revelation been headlined in the newspapers around the world? It's not just some cranky, self-appointed, British, neo-fascist, neo-Nazi pseudo-historian. And you journalists who are present can take those words down. It's not just some pseudo-historian from Britain saying this. This is the British official historian, Professor Hinsley, who had unlimited access to the archives of the SIS, the Secret Intelligence Service, and to the archives of the British code-breaking agency, who says that in Auschwitz nearly all the deaths were due to disease. There is no reference whatsoever to gassings. (Applause).16
16. In fact, Hinsley did not claim that nearly all the deaths were due to disease; all he wrote was that the British decrypts of encoded radio messages sent from Auschwitz did not mention gassings, which is hardly surprising, given the Nazis' policy of not mentioning the gas chambers explicitly in any of their communications with one another.
17. Moreover, although Irving claimed that the radio reports from Auschwitz to the central administration of the camps in Berlin were decrypted by British intelligence at Bletchley Park 'from 1942 to the end of 1943',17 in fact the decrypts ended on 1 September 1942, when the authorities stopped reporting deaths by radio, and reported them only in writing. The returns to which Hinsley referred covered early-to-mid-1942, which was the only period during which the total number of prisoners in the camp corresponded to the total number of inmates mentioned in the decrypts. It was only subsequently that numbers increased (to 135,000 in March 1943) and mass gassing began on a really large scale with the completion of Crematorium II in March 1943.18 Crucially, too, the decrypts were decipherments of radio reports of the additions and subtractions to the regular camp population: these reports omitted all Jews (as well as gypsies) selected for gassing immediately on arrival. Thus they proved nothing, except that there were numerous deaths from executions and disease amongst the regular camp inmates.19 Finally, as Hinsley himself pointed out in reply to a letter from Irving on 17 June 1991, he had not in any case seen the original intercepts himself at all: 'I saw only a summary of them, compiled afterwards, and they were probably not translated and circulated at the time.'20 The originals certainly contained information not purveyed in the summaries, and it is anybody's guess as to what it might have been. The decrypts therefore completely fail to substantiate Irving's allegation that there were no deaths by gassing in Auschwitz.
18 This is far from being the only attempt Irving has made to twist the evidence in order to minimise the numbers of Jews deliberately murdered by the Nazis. 'Despite the most strenuous efforts' he has also claimed, 'the Yad Vashem Museum, Jerusalem, has compiled a list of no more than three million possible Holocaust victims. The same names appear in this list many times over.'21 This does not mean, of course, that the same names refer to the same people; nor does the fact that the number of names compiled totals less than six million mean that six million were not killed.
19. In order to suggest that the figure of six million is mythical, Irving claims that as early as 1919 the governor of New York claimed that 'six million' Jews were being exterminated - a claim that implies the later statistics of Jews killed in the Second World War was not only invented but part of a long tradition of invention.22 In fact, of course, even if this claim was actually made, it has no direct bearing on figures provided by historians and others of Jews killed in the Second World War, which must be assessed on their own merits. The later figure of six million, Irving says, originated in a guesstimate based on a comparison of European Jewish population figures in 1929 and 1946. It has no basis, he declares, in documented historical fact.23 This depends of course on one's definition of 'documented', which in Irving's case, as this Report has already shown, changes according to what he wants to prove. The discrepancy in population is a documented historical fact, and a figure of between five and six million is what is arrived at when calculations are made which take into account everything else which is known about the fate of the European Jews in these years, including emigration and natural deaths.
20. When it comes to suggesting ways in which the missing Jews might in fact have survived the war, Irving suddenly and conveniently forgets his demand for 'documented historical fact'. Nobody, alleges Irving, has 'explained what became of the one million cadavers' which it is claimed 'were produced by killing operations at Auschwitz', nor for that matter what happened to the alleged corpses produced by supposed gassings in other camps.24 There is no trace in Allied aerial photographs of mass graves at Auschwitz, so where have the bodies gone? he asks.25 Irving himself has supplied more than one answer. He has for instance claimed that the Jews who disappeared did not die but were secretly transported to Palestine by the Haganah, the Zionist underground, and given new identities. Irving also suggests some of the missing Jews were killed in the February 1945 bombing raid on Dresden: 'Many other raids were like that. Nobody knows how many Jews died in them. Nobody knows how many Jews died on the road of hunger or cold, after the evacuation of concentration camps in late 1944 and early 1945. Nobody knows how many Jews survived in displaced persons' camps. None of the Holocaust historians have researched this.'26
21. Such allegations commonly occur in Irving's speeches. They derive ultimately from the Holocaust denier Paul Rassinier's unsubstantiated assertion that four-fifths of the six million Jews most historians agree had been killed in fact 'were very much alive at the end of the war', repeated by Arthur Butz in his Holocaust denial tract The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.27 In 1989, Irving told an audience who had come to hear him present the Leuchter Report in London, that he had
Alternative explanations to the gas chamber. Obviously if the gas chamber now turns out to have been phony, then we have to try and explain what happened to the figures. Now, one possible reason is the large number that turned up in the state of Palestine, what's now the state of Israel. The Jews that were in Israel didn't come from nowhere. Another part of them, when Auschwitz was liberated, were sent out on the roads to be shipped westwards, where they ended up in cities like Dresden. I don't have to tell you what happened in Dresden three weeks after Auschwitz was evacuated by the Germans. There were one million refugees in the streets of Dresden at the time that we burned Dresden to the ground, killing anything between 100,000 and 250,000 of them. Large numbers of people on the streets in Europe that winter also suffered normal deaths of exposure and starvation and epidemic. I'm offering to you alternative solutions to where the people went.
22. All of this, of course, is pure speculation, unsupported by any of the documentary evidence which Irving usually claims is such an essential and characteristic feature of his historical work.28
23. By advancing such claims, Irving is seeking to minimise the number of Jews killed by the Nazis, and if there is anything consistent at all in the methods which he uses to do this, it is in the double standard of criticism he applies to evidence according to whether it is in his favour or tells against his argument. In a speech delivered on 11 October 1992, for example, Irving recounted how he has discovered hitherto unknown personal papers and memoirs by Adolf Eichmann, the principal bureaucrat in the implementation of the 'Final Solution'. He was obliged to point out that by the time he wrote this account of his life in the 1950s, 'Eichmann's mind is rather confused and muddled', because he used the Morgenthau Plan - an American plan, never accepted by the Allies, to reduce Germany to a pre-industrial condition after the war - as a justification for Auschwitz, whereas Auschwitz was on the point of being closed down at the time of the plan. This does not stop him, however, praising the accuracy of Eichmann's memory when it comes to casting doubt on the estimate given in the memoirs of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, of the numbers of Jews killed in the camp and the abortive negotiations he claimed to have conducted with Zionists in 1944 about a possible 'rescue' of Hungarian and Slovakian Jews (on which 'he has almost total recall').29 Nor does Irving question Eichmann's powers of recall when on 10 April 1961 Eichmann testified that he had not received any written order from Himmler which stated that Hitler had decided that the 'final solution' should begin at once.30
24. What Irving did concede in his 1992 speech was that there were some unauthorized mass shootings of Jews behind the Eastern Front, not least because he was concerned to present the Eichmann papers as authentic and important, and in them Eichmann himself described witnessing one such incident in considerable detail. On this point, Irving was explicitly supported by the leading Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson, speaking on this occasion from among his listeners, who confirmed: 'We assume that there were massacres and hostages and reprisals and so on...I don't know any Revisionist who says that there were no massacres, because there is no war without massacres, especially on the Russian front where you had Jews, and partisans, women, and children all mixed together.' Irving agreed: 'It's important to say this because we are called Holocaust deniers, and the television screens show you the mass graves and all the rest of it, which we don't deny.'31 Irving agreed once more, in 1995, conceding that 'there is no doubt in my mind that on the Eastern front large numbers of Jews were massacred, by criminals with guns - SS men, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, whatever - to get rid of them.'32 Atrocities, as Irving has said or written on many occasions, always occur during wars.33
25. Does this amount to 'Holocaust denial'? Irving is quite explicit that it does, claiming without qualification that 'Eichmann's memoirs are an important element of the refutation of the Holocaust story'.34 If engaging in a 'refutation of the Holocaust story' is not Holocaust denial, then what is? 'For me as a historian', Irving said in 1992, 'the Holocaust is a mere footnote to history. I write about world history; I write about Real History, and I am not going to talk at any great length about something which is of far more obsessive interest to other historians, revisionists, or whatever.'35 Speaking in Toronto on 1 November 1992, Irving declared:
The legend was that Adolf Hitler ordered the killing of six million Jews in gas chambers in Auschwitz. This is roughly how history has had its way for the last forty or fifty years. But when people come along, with no real axe to grind - because I don't think any of us on the right wing on this matter has axes to grind - when people come along and say, "I don't believe this version of it all;" or, "I am not going to accept all the ingredients of that statement," the methods used against us are becoming increasingly bizarre. But why should we accept all the ingredients of their statements? It's like any other marketing project. I don't like that capital "H" they use for the word Holocaust for example: when you see a capital letter on a work it makes you think it is some kind of brandname or trademark like Tylenol, and that we are being sold a package of something, and that we are not allowed to open it at either end to check it first. Well, I am not a Holocaust denier, and that word really offends me, but I am a Holocaust analyst, I think we are entitled to analyse the basic elements of the statement: Adolf Hitler ordered the killing of six million Jews in gas chambers at Auschwitz, and to ask, is any part of this statement open to doubt?36
26. Once again Irving, as in another speech already quoted from his Canadian lecture tour in 1992, was using the term 'analysis' as a euphemism for 'denial'; the difference between 'analysis' and denial' here is non-existent, when one takes Irving's own, highly idiosyncratic definition of the term 'Holocaust' into account. Irving will use almost any word rather than 'denial': 'I don't like this word "deny", he said in 1993 with reference to the figure of six million Jewish victims of Nazism: 'the word "deny" is only one step away from lying, really. I challenge it, I contest it.'37 There is nothing about the word denial that implies telling a lie, however, any more than there is anything about the words challenge, contestation, or analysis that implies telling the truth.
27. At the beginning of his videotape The Search for Truth in History, Irving says once more: 'The Holocaust with a capital "H" is what's gone down in history in this one sentence form, so to speak: "Adolf Hitler ordered the killing of six million Jews in Auschwitz".38 But nobody in fact has ever argued that six million Jews were killed by gassing in Auschwitz, and Irving nowhere cites any references to demonstrate that anybody has: his claim that this is what the term 'Holocaust' means is a figment of his own imagination. The standard works on the Holocaust make it clear both that a substantial proportion of those killed were shot or starved to death or deliberately weakened and made susceptible to fatal diseases as a matter of policy, and that gassings took place at other centres besides Auschwitz, including notably Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka.39
28. Only on one recorded occasion, namely during an interview with the Australian journalist Ron Casey on 27 July, 1995, in other words after the publication of Deborah Lipstadt's book, has Irving departed at all significantly from his extreme minimization of the numbers killed:
Casey: What is your estimate of the number of Jews who died at the hands of Hitler's regime in the war years? What number - and I don't like using this word - what number would you concede were killed in concentration camps?
Irving: I think, like any scientist, I'd have to give you a range of figures and I'd have to say a minimum of one million, which is a monstrous crime, and a maximum of about four million, depending on what you mean by killed. If putting people into a concentration camp where they die of barbarity and typhus and epidemics is killing, then I would say the four million figure, because, undoubtedly, huge numbers did die in the camps in the conditions that were very evident at the end of the war.40
29. Nowhere else in recent years has Irving even come close to putting the figure at more than a million. Far more usual has been his claim that the Nazis killed 'on the order of thousands at a time....not millions.'41
30. Even in giving, exceptionally, a figure of between one and four million however, it was noticeable that Irving strongly qualified his remarks by claiming that 'barbarity and typhus and epidemics' were the main causes of death. Irving had a long record of blaming the high mortality rate in the camps - insofar as he conceded it at all - on epidemics rather than on deliberate, systematic killing. Thus for example in 1986 he told an audience, again in Australia, that the piles of dead filmed in Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen at the end of the war had been the result of epidemics which 'had only broken out in the last two or three weeks of the war.' And who in Irving's view was responsible for these epidemics?
We have to admit probably that we, the British and the Americans, were partially responsible, at least partially responsible for their misfortune. Because we vowed deliberate bombing of the transportation networks, deliberate bombardation, bombarding the German communications, by deliberate destruction of the German pharmaceutical industry, medicine factories. We had deliberately created the conditions of chaos inside Germany. We had deliberately created the epidemics, and the outbreaks of typhus and other diseases, which led to those appalling scenes that were found at their most dramatic in the enclosed areas, the concentration camps, where of course epidemics can ravage and run wild.42
31. In fact, of course, conditions for epidemics were deliberately created by the Nazis, who ran the camps in a way that deprived the inmates of hygiene and medical attention as a matter of policy.43 Irving has a repeated tendency to blame virtually all the deaths of the Second World War on the Allies in general, the British in particular, and above all on Winston Churchill. Thus he told an audience in South Africa in 1986:
We went in and we bombed the Belgians, and the Poles, and the French, and the Dutch. We did appalling damage. We killed millions of people in Europe in the most bestial way, in defiance of all conventions. In a way which eventually damned with infamy on the name of the British, and it all goes back on Winston Churchill's name.
31. Indeed, he said on another occasion, probably in the same year: 'We'd killed 20 million people.'44 Winston Churchill, in Irving's view, 'bears at least a partial share of the blame for the tragedy that befell the Jews in Europe, because Churchill fought the war five years longer than was necessary and provided the smokescreen behind which the tragedy could occur.'45
32. In conclusion, therefore, it is clear that Irving has consistently and grossly underestimated the number of Jews deliberately killed by the Nazis, usually by quoting a total figure, or figures for individual killing centres such as Auschwitz, of a completely different, lower order of magnitude than those generally accepted by reputable professional historians, frequently by attributing such deaths as he does concede occurred to 'natural' causes such as epidemics and malnutrition, and occasionally even by blaming British bombing raids and the British persistence in prosecuting the war throughout the period 1940-1945. All of this puts him into the same camp as the well-known Holocaust deniers who regularly give a negative answer to the question 'did six million really die?'46
1. Audiocassette 89: Terry Lane, ABC 3L0 Radio, interview with Irving, 18 Narch 1986.
2. David Irving's 1988 Testimony at the Trial of Ernst Zündel, on Irving's website 'Documents on the Auschwitz controversy', p. 12.
3. Videotape 223: Irving interviewed on Australian Channel 7, 1 October 1996, 3 mins. 25 secs..
4. Ibid., pp. 16, 151, 93.
5. For a discussion of this document and Irving's interpretation of it, see below, Part III, section c, subsection (iv)
6. This refers to the 'Schlegelberger memorandum', discussed in Part III, section c, subsection (v) below.
7. Gilbert, The Holocaust, Ch. 26-27.
8. For a detailed discussion of these figures, see below., Part IV, Section b.
9. Letter from Irving to The Spectator on 25 November 1989, cited in Eatwell, 'How to Revise History', p. 312; the figure of 50,000 appears in Irving's speech in Latvian Hall, Toronto, on 8 November 1990 (Videotape 190, from 55 mins. 30 secs.).
10. See H. Brunswig, Feuersturm über Hamburg (Stuttgart, 1978), pp. 279, 400-402; W. Johe, 'Strategisches Kalkül und Wirklichkeit: Das "Unternehmen Gomorrah". Die Großangriffe der RAF gegen Hamburg im Sommer 1943', in K.-J. Muller and D. Dilks (eds.), Großbritannien und der deutsche Widerstand 1933-1944 (Paderborn, 1994), pp. 217-228, here p. 221; F. Bajohr, 'Hamburgs "Führer". Zur Person und Tatigkeit des Hamburger NSDAP-Gauleiters Karl Kaufmann', in F. Bajohr and J. Szodrzynski (eds.), Hamburg in der NS-Zeit (Hamburg, 1995), pp, 59-92, here p. 82; U. Büttner, 'Hamburg im Luftkrieg', in M. Hiller et al. (eds.), Städte im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Essen, 1991), pp. 272-298; Richard Overy, Why the Allies Won (London, 1995), p. 120; M. Middlebrook, The Battle of Hamburg (London, 1980), p. 328.
11. Speech by David Irving to an audience in the Latvian Hall, Toronto, November 8, 1992. Transcript from Irving's 'Focal Point' website (Irving's italics) - also as Videotape 190. Quite who Irving means by 'them' in the phrase 'us, their opponents', is not entirely clear, but from the reference to 'their Holocaust', it would seem to mean the Jews.
12. U. Hohn, Die Zerstorung deutscher Städte im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Dortmund, 1991), pp 119 and 208, note 586; H. Bardua, 'Kriegsschäden in Baden-Württemberg 1939-1945', in Kommission für geschichtliche Landeskunde in Baden-Württemberg (ed.), Historischer Atlas von Baden-Württemberg (Stuttgart, 1975), p. 8; W. A. Boelcke, 'Wirtschaft und Sozialsituationen', in 0. Borst (ed.), Das Dritte Reich in Baden und Württemberg (Stuttgart, 1988), pp. 29-45, here p. 40.
13. lrving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (London, 1996), p. 352, n. 13. As we have seen, camp records did not incude those killed on or shortly after arrival.
14. lrving videotape, 'The Search for Truth in History', cited in Nigel Jackson, The Case for David Irving (Sidgwick, Australia, 1992), p. 88. Jackson describes Irving as 'one of the greatest historians ever to have written in English' (p. 95). This appears to be the same as Videotape 200. For other examples of Irving's estimation of the number of deaths and murders at Auschwitz, see Videotape 190 (Latvian Hall, Toronto, 8 November 1990) -'50,000 people were killed in Auschwitz... the number is too high ...nearly all of the deaths were due to disease' (from 55 mins. 30 sees.); audiotape 108 (speech to the 'Free Speech League',Victoria, British Columbia, 27 October 1990, no. 507) -40,000 killed at Auschwitz in three years; Videotape 200, 'The Search for Truth in History' (1993) - 100,000 deaths from all causes, '25,000 people murdered in Auschwitz in three years' (from 1 hr. 13 mins. 15 secs.).The variation in the figures is typical of Irving's indifference to statistical accuracy: for a classic case study of his invention of statistics to suit his arguments, see the analysis of his account of the Dresden bombing raids, below.
15. Videotape 200: 'The Search for Truth in History', 1993, at 1 hr. 12 mins..
16. Videotape 190: Irving at Latvian Hall, Toronto, 8 November 1992, from 1 hr. 7 mins. 15 secs..
17. lrving, 'Battleship Auschwitz', The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 10, No. 4.
18. See Irving, 'Auschwitz and the Typhus Plague in Poland. More preview pages from David Irving's new biography, Churchill s War, Vol. II', posted on Irving's 'Focal Point' website, seen at 12 February 1999: see also F. H. Hinsley et al., British Intelligence in the Second World War: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations (Cambridge,m 1979-1984), Vol. 2, Appendix, p. 673: 'The returns from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassing.'
19. Richard Breitman, Official Secrets: What the Nazis Planned, What the British and Americans Knew (London, 1998), p. 115.
20. lrving's discovery list: document 1,350 (see also document 1,349). Hinsley added that he thought it highly unlikely that the original transcripts had been retained.
21. lrving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (London, 1996), p.341, n. 12.
22. 'The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop', American Hebrew, 31 October, 1919, is the source cited by Irving.
23. lrving, Nuremberg, p. 62.
24. Reply to Defence of Second Defendant, pp. 5-6.
25. lrving, Nuremberg, pp. 24-5, 353.
26. Videotape 200, 1 hr 15 mins. 40 sees. Given the extent of the evidence for systematic murder as the principal cause of the 'disappearance', the burden of proving alternative causes, by adducing evidence of similar quality, lies on the denier.
27. Rassinier, Debunking, p. 214; Butz, The Hoax, p.242.
28. Videotape 184: Leuchter Report Press Conference, 23 June 1989, from 19 mins. 40 secs; see below, Section IV (g), for Dresden
29. This well-known episode is the subject of Chapter 9 of Yehuda Bauer, Jews for Sale? Nazi-Jewish Negotiations, 1933-1945 (New Haven, 1994).
30. David Irving's 1988 Testimony at the Trial of Ernst Zündel, p. 147.
31. 'David Irving on the Eichmann and Goebbels Papers. Speech at Los Angeles, California, October 11, 1992 (11th Conference of the Institute for Historical Review, transcript on Irving's "Focal Point" Web site).
32. David Irving, 'Revelations from Goebbels's Diary', Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 15 (1995), No. 1, pp. 2-17, here p. 15.
33. David Irving's 1988 Testimony at the Trial of Ernst Zündel, pp. 86, 132, 141, when he told the court that 'about 50,000 people' were killed in the Nazi 'euthanasia' murders of asylum inmates and the mentally and physically handicapped, 'as many as in one small British air raid'. In fact, as this Report demonstrates, Irving's estimates of the numbers of Germans killed in all the British air raids he mentions are grossly inflated, and none of the actual figures even for large air raids comes anywhere near 50,000; while the accepted figure for the 'euthanasia' killings is over 70,000 for officially recorded killings up to August 1941, and at least another 100,000 in the so-called 'wild euthanasia' thereafter; see Michael Burleigh, Death and Deliverance (Cambridge, 1994), and Henry Friedländer, The Origins of Nazi Genocide. From Euthanasia to the Final Solution (Chapel Hill, 1995).
34. David Irving on the Eichmann and Goebbels Papers. Speech at Los Angeles, California, October 11, 1992 (opening sentence of section: 'Eichmann on Höss').
35. David Irving on Freedom of Speech. Speech at Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, October 28, 1992. Transcript on Irving's 'Focal Point' website.
36. Speech by David Irving to a packed hall in the Primrose Hotel,Toronto, November 1, 1992. Transcript from Irving's 'Focal Point' vebsite.
37. Videotape 206: Holmes Show, New Zealand television, 4 June 1993, at 6 mins. 25 secs..
38. Jackson, The Case for David Irving, p. 89.
39. See for example Gilbert, The Holocaust, Marrus, The Holocaust in History, Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, etc.. Not one of the works listed in footnotes 3-8, above, puts forward the definition of the Holocaust used by Irving in the passages cited here.
40. Ron Casey interview with David Irving, 27 July 1995, Station 2GB, Media Monitors (Sydney etc.), Broadcast transcript S36962003.
41. Videotape 190: Irving at Latvian Hall,Toronto, 8 November 1990, at 42 mins. 25 secs..
42. lrving, 'Censorship of History', lecture in Runnymede, Australia, 18 March 1986: Audiocassette 86, 270-291.
43. Wolfgang Sofsky, Die Ordnung des Terrors" Das Konzentrationslager (2nd ed., Frankfurt am Main, 1997), pp. 237-45. See also Videocassette 180,Toronto 1989.
44. Videotape 232: undated speech to the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Carlton Inn, Toronto, from 20 mins. 25 sees. to 20 mins. 55 sees.
45. Audiocassette 93: Irving, 'The Manipulation of History', Toronto, 1 November 1986, 528-532.
46. Paul Rassinier, Debunking the Genocide Myth: A Study of the Nazi Concentration Camps and the Alleged Extermination of European Jewry (Torrance, California, 1978); Austin J. App, The Six Million Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks with Fabricated Corpses (Tacoma Park, Maryland, 1973); Richard Harwood, Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth at Last (London, n.d.); Arthur J. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (Torrance, California, 1976; the 'hoax' in Butz's view was the claim that six million Jews had been killed by the Nazis); Carlo Mattogno, 'The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews', The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 8 (1988), pp. 133-72 and 261-302.
|(b) Use of gas cham... >
|(e) Conclusion >>


text:
USA, 2012, 90 Minute Running Time
Genre/Subject: DocumentaryLanguage: English
MUST END Thursday, June 27th at the Sie FilmCenter
Digital presentation - Before entire networks were built on populist personalities, before reality morphed into a TV genre, the masses fixated on a single, sociopathic star: controversial talk-show host Morton Downey Jr.
In the late '80s, Downey tore apart the traditional talk format by turning debate of current issues into gladiatorial combat. His blow-smoke-in-your-face style drew a rabid cult following, but also the title "Father of Trash Television." Was his show a platform for the working man, or an incubator for Snooki and The Situation? The documentary features interviews with Herman Cain, Pat Buchanan, Chris Elliott, Gloria Allred, Sally Jessy Raphael, Alan Dershowitz, Curtis Sliwa, and Richard Bey. Previously unreleased footage reveals Downey's behind-the-scenes fistfights and foibles. Évocateur also features an exclusive interview with Steven Pagones, the white assistant district attorney accused in 1988 of raping black teenager Tawana Brawley. Brawley advocate Al Sharpton refused to be interviewed for the film, but there is shocking footage of him taped during a Downey show commercial break.
Directors Seth Kramer, Daniel A. Miller, and Jeremy Newberger are recovering, once-rabid Mort fans. They directed the critically acclaimed, Emmy-nominated documentaries The New Recruits and The Linguists.
DIRECTOR: Seth Kramer, Daniel A. Miller, Jeremy Newberger
Editor: Seth KramerScreenwriter: Daniel A. MillerCinematographer: Roger T. Grange, Seth Kramer, Richard Patterson, Rodney Patterson, Chad Wilson, Ben WolfUS Distributor: Magnolia Pictures
Official Film Website
CLICK IMAGE for the Member Newsletter
CLICK IMAGE to submit to the Denver Film Festival. Withoutabox logos are trademarks of Withoutabox, a DBA of IMDb.com Inc. or its affiliates.
CLICK IMAGE to Renew or JoinMembership Updates and Sign Up
CLICK IMAGE for Information
CLICK IMAGE for more information
Site powered by: Luminate

subset: commoncrawl


text:
إرفنج ضد ليبستدات
Holocaust Denial on Trial, Trial Transcripts, Day 22: Electronic Edition
Pages 206 - 207 of 207
|<< 1-5
|< 201-205
1 MR IRVING: Have a stab at it now and see if we can deal with
3 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Have you rather put them to the back of your
4mind because they seem to have not really featured in the
6 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] I thought we were not going to discuss these.
7 MR JUSTICE GRAY: The position is Mr Rampton has not relied on
8it, but that does not stop Mr Irving reintroducing that
9issue. If you say you need to bone up on it?
10 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] No, I am happy to do it now.
11 MR IRVING: I certainly rely on them.
12 MR RAMPTON: Mr Irving does. He may be making a mistake there,
13because he does not know the reason why I decided not to.
14That is his privilege to put his foot in his mouth, if
15that is what is going to happen. I do not know. I do
16worry that it may take more than a quarter of an hour
17though, because it is quite complicated.
18 MR JUSTICE GRAY: I am quite keen to use up all the available
19time, because I am anxious to get Professor Evans out of
20the box on Monday.
21 MR IRVING: I can promise definitely that I will do everything
22I can to have him out of the box. We now have reached
23October 1943 which is of course, as far as I am concerned,
24the watershed and Hitler's knowledge.
25 MR JUSTICE GRAY: True, but remember Mr Rampton may have some
1 MR IRVING: I will leave him more than enough time for that
2I am sure.
3 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Shall we be open about it, because I am quite
4happy to adjourn now if we are sure we will get Professor
5Evans out of the box.
6 MR RAMPTON: I can speak only about my re-examination at the
7moment which consists of but two topics.
8 MR JUSTICE GRAY: So it may be an hour, an hour and a half?
9 MR RAMPTON: Nothing like that. It may be half an hour, maybe
10three-quarters of an hour.
11 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Are you reasonably confident?
12 MR IRVING: Totally confident and, if not, then it is my own
14 MR JUSTICE GRAY: I would not want to leave it on that basis.
15Then I think let us adjourn now.
16 MR IRVING: I think we have broken through the barbed wired.
17We are right through the mine field now and we are out in
18the open desert and our guns are blazing.
19 MR JUSTICE GRAY: I had forgotten about the Roman Jews as
20well. So we are not sitting tomorrow, but Monday at 10.30
21 < (The witness stood down)
22(The Court adjourned until Monday, 21 February 2000).
|<< 1-5
|< 201-205


text:
IT Manager Webinars and Events
Connect with Intel IT experts through live webinars and local events
Connect with Intel IT experts through live webinars and local events
A Mobile Platform Everybody Can Agree On
BYOD and a barrage of new products on the client side have created a wide gap between end users and IT. But one way to bridge that gap is with versatile, purpose-built mobile platforms that improve the business user's experience while satisfying IT's needs for security, manageability, and performance.
Join us for Defining the Ideal Mobile Platform for Business to hear Intel business client specialist Eduardo Campoy and moderator Chris Hubbard examine these critical considerations in selecting a mobile platform everyone can agree upon:
Find documents and videos on topics for IT decision makers, such as Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Center Efficiency, Enterprise Mobility, and more.


text:
- Dec 20:
- Video: Phil Robertson preaches against gays and animal lovers in 2010
- Phil Robertson's 'bestiality' remark earned 'Duck Dynasty' suspension
- Dec 19:
- Hicks: A&E not oppressing Phil Robertson with suspension
- Can 'Duck Dynasty' survive now that Phil Robertson is suspended?
- Dec 18:
- 'Duck Dynasty's' Phil Robertson calls homosexuality a 'sin' and 'illogical'
The family of Phil Robertson released a statement Thursday night after A&E suspended the patriarch from the show because of anti-gay remarks he made to GQ magazine. Here is the full statement:
"We want to thank all of you for your prayers and support. The family has spent much time in prayer since learning of A&E's decision. We want you to know that first and foremost we are a family rooted in our faith in God and our belief that the Bible is His word. While some of Phil's unfiltered comments to the reporter were coarse, his beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible. Phil is a Godly man who follows what the Bible says are the greatest commandments: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart' and 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' Phil would never incite or encourage hate. We are disappointed that Phil has been placed on hiatus for expressing his faith, which is his constitutionally protected right. We have had a successful working relationship with A&E but, as a family, we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm. We are in discussions with A&E to see what that means for the future of Duck Dynasty. Again, thank you for your continued support of our family."


text:
Why do we call ourselves uncommon? Because not only do we carry over 60,000 everyday basics and fun, hard-to-find items – no one else does what we do! We're also the only online retailer to combine pharmacy with over-the-counter drugstore items and prestige beauty products. Additionally, we have a number of web stores and partnerships under our umbrella to maximize our retail success: Beauty.com for prestige beauty products, VisionDirect.com for contact lenses and Custom Nutrition Services to provide customized nutritional supplement recommendations to promote well being and optimize health.
We're proud to encourage an internal culture that promotes accountability for results and focus on the customer, and we have employees at every level who demonstrate agility, innovation and passion for the business.
We offer career development opportunities and excellent benefits in a challenging work environment. We hire creative thinkers from all walks of life to contribute to our dynamic team, and help us grow into a strong, smart, and profitable company that gives back to the community.
Our Mission
Delivering on our Mission
It all starts with our employees - incredibly talented, confident and energetic people that operate with a clear set of values in their careers. Regardless of the environment and circumstances, our values come first. Our values are the foundation for all we do and more than anything else, they guide the actions we take every day, with customers, colleagues and shareholders. Our values are:
How do we share our success? Each year, we encourage individual employees to volunteer at different events as well as providing donations of products and food. Plus the employee run drugstore.com foundation gives grants to local non-profits that offer food, shelter, therapy, and training to those in need.


text:
President's Welcome
Welcome to the Lehman College website. Here you can learn about Lehman's rich history as a senior college of The City University of New York, take a virtual tour of our picturesque campus, explore the more than 90 graduate and undergraduate programs that we offer, and read about our latest faculty research. You can also apply for admission online, browse through our busy schedule of free lectures and concerts, and purchase tickets to events in our Performing Arts Center.
For four decades, Lehman College has been providing students with a first-rate liberal arts education, as well as preparation for careers in teaching, business, social work, the health sciences and other areas. Our more than 360 full-time faculty members represent a broad spectrum of scholarship in over 30 fields and include seven who hold the title of Distinguished Professor, the highest rank attainable within CUNY. Our more than 63,000 alumni are the backbone of many industries and organizations and are making important contributions both professionally and within their communities in the New York region, across the nation and internationally.
More than 12,000 students are taking advantage of Lehman's diverse programs and courses and enjoying some of the finest academic and athletic facilities available in the New York area. These include a new speech and hearing clinic (which welcomes inquiries from community residents), state-of-the-art labs in biology, geographic information science and new media, and a world-class sports and recreation center. I invite you to visit Lehman in person, tour some of these facilities, and enjoy our 37-acre, tree-lined campus, which is also home to splendid examples of both Gothic and contemporary architecture.
We welcome your continued interest in the people and programs of Lehman College.


text:
There are no items in your cart at this time.
Celebrating 30 years of providing fashionable comfort footwear and excellent service— Footwear etc. • Established 1986 —
Sign up to receive new arrival, sale & special event info from us.
Note: we do not share your personal information with anyone. Period.
"Very good company! Would highly recommend! Excellent return policy! Excellent customer service on the phone! I just hit a bit of trouble checking out it took me several times to submit by credit card and there is nothing wrong with my credit card but eventually it went through fine."
©2016 Footwear Etc. All Rights Reserved. For any questions or assistance call 1-800-720-0572.


text:
In Theaters This Week
In sports and the military, professionalism describes people who go about their work with a calm, dispassionate efficiency -- no fuss, no panic when things go wrong, few mistakes, little attention paid to the odds or the chance for glory.
You can apply that word to movie actors, too. The great cast of character actors of "Phantom," a solid Cold War-era submarine thriller of modest ambitions, never reveals that this isn't "The Hunt for Red October" or "K-19: The Widowmaker." Ed Harris, William Fichtner, David Duchovny and Co. show up, hit their marks, give their lines some punch and play the heck out of this B-picture, which easily could have been just a prop (a submarine) in search of a movie.
Writer-director Todd Robinson (he scripted "White Squall") has cooked up an alternative bit of Cold War mythology. In 1968, a tense time when U.S. and Soviet subs were tangling and occasionally sinking, a Soviet sub went missing. Here's a far-fetched explanation.
Harris plays a retiring Soviet captain taking the B-67 out to sea on one last cruise before it's sold to the Chinese and he's put out to pasture. The vessel is a "smoker," an aged diesel sub in an age of "atom smasher" powered boats. He's the son of a hero of the service and is haunted by his past.
Does he believe in omens? His hastily assembled crew drops stuff while they're frantically loading the boat. Things break. Oh, and his commanding officer (Lance Henriksen, another old pro) shoots himself as the B-67 clears the harbor.
On board is a nuclear-armed missile, some sort of experimental gadget and a couple of heavy-handed security guys, led by Bruni (Duchovny), to supervise the testing of it. Fichtner is the loyal second in command. Johnathon Schaech reinvents himself as a conflicted political officer.
Nobody feigns an accent. Nobody calls anybody else "comrade." They just go about the business of putting an aged, crowded killing machine through its paces en route to the Pacific, where nerves, loyalties and history will be put to the test.
Characters spend much of the movie explaining submarine tactics to the "guests" on board, who apparently have never seen a submarine movie ("sound is the enemy of a submarine").
They diagram Kremlin politics and conspiracy theories and gripe about the Americans -- always trailing them, always on watch, "with their snouts in the trough."
Robinson manages some suspense, but the thriller's ticking clock is a weak one. However, the cast never lets on that this alternative history (think Glomar Explorer) isn't the most dazzling riff on the Soviet-era "Silent Service."
Too late for review: "The Last Exorcism Part II," a new spooker opening this weekend, did not screen in advance for critics. A review of "21 & Over," a raunch comedy, was not available at presstime. Reviews of both will be posted online at www.mercurynews.com/entertainment when they become available.
* *
Rating: R (for violence)
Cast: Ed Harris, David Duchovny, William Fichtner and Lance Henriksen
Director: Todd Robinson
Running time: 1 hour,
38 minutes


text:
Share Photo
FILE - In this Jan. 28, 1968 file photo, Jack "Murph the Surf" is escored to the Miami Beach Police Station by detectives in Miami Beach, Fla., after he was arrested with three other men for armed robbery. Murphy, the famed jewel thief and surfer known as "Murph the Surf," has spent the last quarter-century going into prisons and telling inmates that they could still turn their lives around. Now 75, he asked the state of Florida to restore his civil rights despite the fact he spent nearly 20 years in prison for murder. The answer: No. (AP Photo, File)


text:
With a busy life on the go and so much to do, the last thing you want is to spend extra time waiting for your files to transfer. Now you can step up to the next level of performance - and take advantage of the USB 3.0 port on your new laptop or computer - with the Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 flash drive. The drive leverages SuperSpeed USB 3.0 technology to deliver faster file transfer. Also backwards compatible with USB 2.0.
Faster File Transfer with SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Technology
With a busy life on the go and so much to do, the last thing you want is to spend extra time waiting for your files to transfer. Now you can step up to the next level of performance--and take advantage of the USB 3.0 port on your new laptop or computer--with the Lexar® JumpDrive® S73 USB 3.0 flash drive. The drive leverages SuperSpeed USB 3.0 technology to deliver faster file transfer in a range of colors and capacities from 8GB-64GB.
Convenient, Reliable Portable Storage
Store and Transfer Content Faster with SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Technology. With speeds up to 3x faster (up to 45MB/s read and 20MB/s write)* than standard JumpDrive USB 2.0 drives, the Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 flash drive gives you the power, for example, to quickly, easily, and reliably transfer a 3GB HD video clip in less than 2 minutes (compared to less than 20 minutes using a standard USB 2.0 drive).** Leveraging the efficiencies of SuperSpeed USB 3.0 technology, it provides impressive high-speed transfer of your photos, videos, files, and more--for only slightly more than the cost of a standard USB 2.0 flash drive. And for added versatility, the drive is backwards compatible with USB 2.0 devices.
Colorful Style. Lexar JumpDrive S73 comes in a range of colorful capacity options--8GB in blue, 16GB in purple, 32GB in orange, and 64GB in green. These stylish options make it fun and easy to find one to suit your needs and reflect your personality. They also provide you with a built-in color coding system to help you organize your drives and their contents.
Designed for Convenience. Beyond its performance and good looks, JumpDrive S73 is designed for convenience. It sports a retractable connector and easy-to-use thumb slide, and also includes a key ring loop so you can easily attach it to your keychain, computer bag, backpack, or purse and go.
Lexar Performance, Quality, Compatibility, and Reliability. All Lexar memory card, card reader, and USB flash drive product designs undergo extensive testing in the Lexar Quality Labs, facilities with more than 800 digital devices, to ensure performance, quality, compatibility, and reliability. This provides customers with a high level of confidence when using Lexar products to capture, manage, move, and store the memories that matter.
- Store and transfer content faster with SuperSpeed USB 3.0 technology
- Speeds up to 3x faster (up to 45MB/s read and 20MB/s write) than standard JumpDrive® USB 2.0 drives--at only slightly more in cost
- Colorful capacity
- Retractable connector with convenient thumb slide
- Reliably stores and transfers photos, videos, files, and more
- Compatible with PC and Mac® systems
- Three-year limited warranty
- Product Description
- Lexar JumpDrive S73 - USB flash drive - 64 GB
- Product Type
- USB flash drive
- Interface Type
- Storage Capacity
- Enclosure Colour
- Green
- Manufacturer Warranty
- 3 years warranty
- Product Type
- USB flash drive
- Storage Capacity
- Enclosure Colour
- Green
- Compatibility
- Non-specific
- Read Rate
- Up to 45 MB/s
- Write Rate
- Up to 20 MB/s
- Interface Type
- Features
- Retractable connector
Manufacturer Warranty
- Service & Support
- 3 years warranty
- Service & Support Details
- Limited warranty - 3 years
Customer reviews
Write a review for the Lexar JumpDrive S73 - 64 GB - USB 3.0 here!
Great value budget USB thumb drive
Reviewed by Anonymous Review Posted 27/01/2013
No problems. Will work on pretty much and device. Yes you have to format it for some systems (for example some devices only like FAT32,some NTFS, some EXT3.. whatever.).
- Overall
- Ease of use
- Value for money
Some niggles but OK
Reviewed by Don Zappa. Review Posted 24/01/2013
Seems to do the job.
Wrote 5 GB of AVIs in 2m30s so is much quicker than USB 2. Write speed indicated about 34 mbps rather than the 45 claimed.
TV and DVD player wouldn't read it.
No problem with any of my USB 2 sticks.
Called Lexar 'Euro' support - they didn't have a clue.
Guessed it was file system, so used HP disc tool to format in FAT32 now plays AVIs through the TV! Don't know if this affects performance.
Stick gets hot in use and cheap plastic casing won't dissipate much heat, so I'm nervous about trying to write 64gb in one go.
Ordered on 18th, delivered on 23rd at a cost of £3.99. To be fair they don't indicate it'll be any quicker, but we're paying for a courier and a huge cardboard box too big for a letter box. Wouldn't a thick jiffy bag have done as well and be cheaper? Sticks are pretty robust as a rule.
But at £25 is good value. Reason I marked stars down is coz not everyone is able to figure out the file system issue, and Lexar were no help either.
- Overall
- Ease of use
- Value for money
Lexar JumpDrive S73 - 64 GB - USB 3.0
Reviewed by Paul Youngman. Review Posted 07/12/2012
I ordered 2 of these, one for myself and the other as a gift. They both arrived very quickly and I am already using my own unit without any problem. However, I did notice on the packaging that they are compatible with Windows XP,Vista and Windows 7.(Also Mac OS X) From past experience I doubt that they will work with Windows 8. Could this be the reason for the low price? As I am running 7, I don't have a problem, but if I upgrade to a new computer (due to a failure of my current system) it could be rendered useless as any data on it could not be transferred. I think that this should be highlighted on your website for any Windows 8 users to be made aware of prior to purchase. At the moment under 'Compatibility' it simply states 'Non-Specific'
- Overall
- Ease of use
- Value for money
The opinions expressed in this reviews section are those of our customers and not of BT Shop. Nothing contained herein amends BT Shop's terms and conditions.


text:
Grounding Principles and Practices
- Grounding Objectives
- Ground Potential Difference
- Typical Symptoms of Problems
- Grounding Practices
- Grounding Diagrams
- Ground Loops
- Neutral-to-Earth (NEV) and Stray Voltage
- Surge Protection
- Questions/Open Discussion
Stray Voltage can contribute to nervousness in farm animals, and is also a source for "tingle shocks."
Basic Grounding and Surge Protection is another course that you may consider.
The Basic Grounding and Surge Protection course covers basics that you need to know about why damage occurs when there is a lightning strike and how to protect your equipment from most lightning.


text:
You are a fan of andrema jesus ? Come to discover the best forums andrema jesus on the internet and share your experience with a community fan of andrema jesus . You can also build a forum andrema jesus and create your online discussion.
Free forum : A End Time Christian Site Telling Bible Prophecy News That Is Happening Now!
christ, #jesus, prophecies, fulfilled, christian, studies, religious, site, god's, bible, being, fulled, poems, short, stories
David Flynn's official Watcher Forum
watcher, flynn, newton, #jesus, mark, giants, nephilim, heaven, times, apocalypse, transhumanism, news, forbidden, secrets, labyrinth, vault
A Christian fellowship where 'Believers' can come together to talk, discuss, enjoy, pray for others and give testimonies, chat, enjoy the fullness of being a Christian all in one site.
free, forum, gods, christian, fellowship, holy, spirit, bible, #jesus, christ, salvation, believers, come, together, talk, discuss, enjoy, pray, christianity, trinity, love, peace, happiness
To assist all to know reality about Almighty God, his Son, Jesus, and true and false religion and doctrine.
religious, truths, iris, assist, know, reality, about, almighty, #jesus, true, false, religion, doctrine
Gospels revealed to Maria Valtorta, Poem of the ManGod, This visionary woman of the early 20th century was given the Life of Christ and Blessed Virgin Mary
poem, man-god, maria, valtorta, gospels, revealed, #jesus, mary, apparitions, locutions, private, revelations, life


text:
DENVER - Mom gets the medal.
That would be Jean Armstrong, mother of the newly-crowned 4A 220-pound state wrestling champion, Eagle Valley's Andy Armstrong.
"I think I'll let Mom hold onto it," said Armstrong late Saturday night from a pizza joint in Denver. "She gets really excited when I wrestle. She got nervous a couple of times at state, but, overall, she's excited."
While the unknown 27th Amendment to the Constitution is that mothers will always worry about their sons, not much worrying needed to be done. Andy Armstrong seemed to have this one all the way.
He is the 16th state champion in school history after pounding Canon City's Garrett Benell, 14-3, in Saturday night's final. He's the first from Eagle Valley since Chris Harvey did it at 160 pounds back in 2006. At 40-0, Armstrong is the school's first undefeated state champ since heavyweight Mike Long turned the trick in 2000, according to Devils wrestling coach Ron Beard.
And as simple as it sounds, that was the game plan from the moment he took fifth place just about one year ago at the state tourney at the Pepsi Center - win the state title and go undefeated.
"I had a lot of motivation after last year," Armstrong said. "I wanted to do better than fifth. I worked hard to improve and feel like I did it."
He did.
Trite as it is, it's true -champions are built in the offseason. After taking fifth at state last year, Armstrong started another wrestling season - freestyle. He said that experience helped him helped him learn how to move on the mat and stay focused because, against the elite wrestlers, it takes only the slightest miscue for everything to go sour.
Armstrong's summer home was the weight room - it worked both for wrestling and football. The Eagle Valley senior was big part of the Devils turning it around on the gridiron, going from 1-8 in 2011 to 8-4 and state quarterfinalists last fall.
And a winning environment is contagious. It really isn't a coincidence that Armstrong, an all-state tackle in football, was at state wrestling with his former football teammates - Cole Nielsen (running back and 170 pounds), Ty LaFramboise (linebacker/offensive line and 182 pounds) and Joey Sanchez (nose guard/offensive line and 195 pounds).
Armstrong won the Warrior Classic in Grand Junction, generally the closest thing to a state tournament during the regular season, in December for the second year in a row.
The work continued in the wrestling room, where his name goes up on the wall with the school's other state champions. Yes, there were a lot of tournaments and meets this year, but the room is where the real work is done - pounding and getting pounded on by your teammates.
"They're all really good wrestlers," Armstrong said. "They help push me everyday. They push me. I'm pushing them. It's really a family-friendship thing."
Armstrong made it back-to-back regional championships about a week ago in Montrose, and then arrived in Denver with four matches to go to achieve his goal. Remember, the state tournament is not an average meet in January. Everyone's good. The four opponents he defeated this weekend finished the 2012-13 season with a combined record of 128-40.
Though he won't say it because he's a quiet guy to most, Armstrong made it look easy. Having been to the state meet last year, he knew how to handle the massive gaps between matches. It's not easy to wait 24 hours to wrestle all of six minutes with your goal in sight.
Eagle Valley's Beard, assistant coach Luke Cross and the Devils' entourage didn't know a thing about Canon City's Benell.
"Andy just did his thing," Beard said. "It was Andy having fun and going out and destroying."
Don't forget that Beard won the 167-pound title state title in 1986 when he was a senior at Fruita Monument.
"It's really neat as a coach," Beard said. "It's knowing the feeling and trying to get that kid to that feeling. It's so exciting that I got to be a part of it and have him beat on me in practice. All the kids share in it."
There was no jumping or mad celebration after Armstrong won. He simply pointed to his family - Armstrongs of all generations and links were in the stands, including his parents, Bob and Jean.
"It's amazing to be able to have them there, supporting me through everything," Andy said. "It's great. All this hard work finally paid off."
Sports Editor Chris Freud can be reached at 970-748-2934 or firstname.lastname@example.com.


text:
STOCKTON – Four suspects assaulted one man and forced another to the ground when they robbed a residence in the 1700 block of West Fremont Street at 10:50 p.m. Monday.
The first victim was standing outside the location when the suspects approached him. One of them was armed with a handgun and assaulted the victim. The other three entered the residence and forced the second victim down. They stole several items, according to the Stockton Police Department. Both victims are 43 years old.
The suspects, all males, were described as in their late 20s and with thin builds.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
Manchin mulls No Budget, No Pay Act
Also voices support for women in combat
January 25, 2013
WASHINGTON — A West Virginia senator who supports withholding paychecks unless Congress passes a budget that addresses fiscal problems has reservations with the No Budget, No Pay Bill Act passed by......
The problem with the act has nothing to do with Manchin. The problem has to do with the 27th Amendment to the US Constitution. No law regarding Congressional pay raises or reductions can take effect until after an election of the House of Representatives.
Even if the law passed, it would be until the 2014 election that it would take effect.
2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
It's the principle of the matter. No employer would pay an employee for continuing to fail at job performance. Why should the public continue to pay the elected representatives, especially when it is out of a budget that doesn't exist because they won't agree on it? The only thing I have a problem with is that the deadline is still 3 months away. Really? Make it interesting and put the vote before the next pay period ends...that might get some of those suits moving.
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
no budget, no pay.....yeah,that will teach all those millionaires a thing or two.
8 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Showing 3 of 3 comments


text:
An 11-year-old girl suffered minor injuries Thursday morning when the school bus she was riding in slid off the road in Shelby County.
According to the Missouri State Highway Patrol the mishap happened at 10:15 a.m. on Missouri 15, 0.5 of a mile north of Shelbyville.
A 2009 Bluebird bus operated by Gregory K. Linberger, 44, of Shelbyville was traveling on an ice-covered road when a strong cross wind pushed the bus off the east side of the road and into a ditch.
Injured in the accident was Christian Coale of Leonard. She was taken by ambulance to Samaritan Hospital in Macon.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
That showtime has passed. Please try next available showtime.
United Kingdom, 2012, 95 Minute Running Time
Genre/Subjects: Biographical, Comedy, Drama, Historical/Period
Program: Special PresentationLanguage: English
DIRECTOR: Roger Michell
Producer: David Aukin, Kevin LoaderEditor: Nicolas GasterScreenwriter: Richard NelsonCinematographer: Lol CrawleyPrincipal Cast: Bill Murray, Laura Linney, Olivia Williams, Elizabeth Marvel, Olivia Colman, Sam Creed
In June 1939, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Academy Award nominee Bill Murray) and his wife, Eleanor (Olivia Williams), host the king and queen of England (Samuel West and Olivia Colman) for a weekend at the Roosevelt home at Hyde Park on Hudson, in upstate New York—the first-ever visit of a reigning English monarch to America. With Britain facing imminent war with Germany, the royals are desperately looking to FDR for support. But international affairs must be juggled with the complexities of FDR's domestic establishment, as wife, mother, and mistresses all conspire to make the royal weekend an unforgettable one. Seen through the eyes of Daisy (Academy Award nominee Laura Linney), Franklin's neighbor and intimate, the weekend will produce not only a special relationship between two great nations, but, for Daisy—and through her, for us all—a deeper understanding of the mysteries of love and friendship.
Click here for Information on Group Rates and Discounts!
Sponsored by:
Site powered by: Luminate


text:
A standoff on Magnolia Street in Portland following a reported stabbing has ended.
The standoff ended around 1 a.m., when the police special response team entered the home with a search warrant.
Police took one juvenile into custody on an outstanding warrant but haven't said how the stabbing happened or even who they think committed the stabbing.
The man who was reportedly stabbed is being treated at Medical Maine Center for non-life-threatening injuries, said Lt. Robert Ridge of the Portland Police Department.
A person called police about a man covered with blood on Allen Avenue earlier Wednesday night. After police arrived, they went to a home on Magnolia Street, Ridge said.
Medcu took the stabbed man to Maine Medical Center.


text:
It was a matter of minutes that John Skelton was in front of a Lenawee County Circuit Court judge on Wednesday morning. The pre-trial hearing ended with the case being sent back to district court, so Skelton can be arraigned on the new charges. In addition to parental kidnapping, 39-year-old Skelton faces, three counts each of unlawful imprisonment and kidnapping, which carry a life in prison penalty if convicted. 7-year-old Alexander, 5-year-old Tanner and 9-year-old Andrew have been missing since Thanksgiving. Their father maintains that he does not know where they are.
"I think justice will take place as it needs to be and we're all accepting that," said Leasa Slocum who lives and works in Morenci.
The Morenci community is anxious for this case to move forward and some are clinging to a dimming hope.
"I think in a way we're all still hopeful because it's the unknown. We're just hopeful that they'll pop up alive but because of how the investigation has turned it's in the back of everyone's mind [and we're] coming to accept that it's not going to be the best outcome," said Slocum.
While no murder charges have been filed, Morenci Police Chief Larry Weeks has declared this a homicide investigation and many in Morenci say it has gripped this community and changed them forever.
"You still look on the side of the road; you still look as the snow goes away. You're still watching," said Slocum.
Yellow ribbons have been put up all over the city to signify solidarity and to support each other as many now look for closure.
An auction supporting the Skelton brothers reward fund has been set up. It's happening March 19, 2011. Doors open at 5 p.m. and the auction starts at 6 p.m. Proceeds benefit the law enforcement and prosecution that are working on this case. Any remaining funds will go toward new playground equipment in the city. For more information on the auction, click on the link below.


text:
Does anyone run in both neutral AND stability shoes, or have a kind of gait that doesn't really depend on one type or the other? I've been running for a little over a year now, and when I was originally evaluated for shoes, I was told I was overpronating slightly on my right foot but not at all on my left, that my arches were high, and that I needed neutral running shoes. I bought Nike Zoom Vomero 6 and Asics Gel Excel. I also had insoles custom made from Road Runner Sports. Up through December, after 12 months of running, I had no issues, except for my left knee that was hurting even before I started running (doctor gave me the all clear to run though). I was only running 2 - 4 miles at a time, and only about 2 - 3 days/week for most of the year, and spread out between two pairs of shoes, so I don't have a lot of mileage on each shoe or the insoles (the insoles are good for 2 pairs of shoes or 900 miles according to the company). Well, come January I started to increase my mileage (I'm losing weight and trying to get my mileage up to help me keep the weight off and to train for my first half). I'm increasing it by about half a mile to a mile every 1-2 weeks. I've started to notice on my longer runs that my right ankle will start hurting (mildly for the most part) after the run or the next day. I tried running without the custom insoles (put the original shoes' insoles back in) and the ankle pain stopped but my left foot's arch started to hurt a little bit during runs. I bought a new pair of the Gel Excel and didn't really see any difference on shorter runs. I went to another running store and had my gait reevaluated and they said I was overpronating in neutral shoes and needed stability shoes. I didn't really feel any difference between the stability and the neutrals, but all I did were test runs in the store anyway. I ended up buying some Saucony Progrid (I think..not sure if that's what they were called) and haven't tried them on any runs yet, but as I said, I didn't feel any difference at the store between running a stability shoe or a neutral. Since I only want to run the Saucony shoes on the treadmill for now (so I can return them if they don't work), I chose to wear my new Excel shoes on my long run yesterday for the first time, and with the custom insoles I was previously using, and my feet felt just fine afterwards. I ran my longest run yet, 8.18 miles, on pavement (as usual) and I felt fine. Perhaps my issues were just from the two older shoes. I don't know. but now I'm not sure if there was even any point in my having bought the Saucony stability shoes. I suppose I will still give them a try on some shorter treadmill runs, but I'm kind of confused. I know typically people with higher arches use neutral shoes, and mine have done fine for me except for those few long runs I had in the older shoes, but despite my high arches, that one store (who has one of the best reputations in the Atlanta area) told me I was overpronating and needed stability. And then the other store a year ago told me I was not overpronating except slightly on my right foot. Is it possible that I could maybe run in either? Or what do you think?
Jessica Mowrey
Yes. That's the short answer.
I run in whatever feels good, and that has ranged from Asics Gel-Nimbus to Saucony Kinvara 2 to Mizuno Wave Precision and Wave Rider, Saucony Mirage 2, Asics Gel DS Trainer and Asics Gel Kayano, among others. Some of these are neutral, some stability, some lightweight trainers, varying degrees of cushioning and support, etc. There are some things missing in your tale: miles per week, total miles on your old shoes, whether that 1/2 to 1 mile increase was per week or per run (sounds like per run since you're up to 8 miles). Your aches could easily be attributed to older shoes combined with mileage increase. (Particularly if the mileage increase was per run meaning about 3 miles per week more. That's a lot on a base of about 10 miles per week.)
As for the shoes, they have been getting away from "categorizing" them as neutral, stability, etc. Instead they talk about what degree of stability features shoes have and the type of runner they would work for - makes it a good bit more confusing (Saucony uses neutral, guidance, stability for instance). "Progrid" is a type of midsole construction that Saucony uses and covers many models of their shoes, such as the Progrid Guide. Though, in looking at their website, they don't mention it so much in the actual shoe name anymore. Based on your description, I would lean toward shoes with fewer stability features. But if it feels good, wear it. If you're a mild over-pronator, you should do OK in a shoe with mild to moderate stability features, or in a "neutral" shoe. Which is how I end up in such a variety of shoes.
I didn't realize I didn't specify...my mileage increase I'm referring to just my long runs. I do a long run once per week usually and increase my distance half mile to a mile at a time. I'm going to give these shoes a try this week and if they don't work for me then I'll return them next weekend, but if they do fine, I'll keep them. Thanks!
I tried quite a lot of shoes before I reached a (surprising) solution. I ended up visiting a podiatrist. I was lucky because she is also a runner and new quite a lot about running shoes. The solution she proposed to me was to wear insoles specially designed for my feet (I am a heavy overpronator) and use only neutral shoes. Her other good advice was to wear whatever feels comfortable and not to worry too much about cushioning. Since then, most of my shoe problems have disapeared.
Current PB:
5k: 19:53 (December 31st 2014)
10k : 42:30 (March 9th 2014)
Half Marathon: 1:32:40 (February 1st 2015)
Marathon: 3:33:31 (March 15th 2015)
Completed my first marathon! Feeling like getting some more!
I run in whatever comfortable shoes I can find on the bargain table. Usually I limit it to Mizuno and Asics though. I don't really care about what "type" of shoes they are; just as long as they are comfortable. That got me through 4 marathons last year and 14 in the last 4 years.
ACTIVE is the leader in online event registrations from 5k running races and marathons to softball leagues and local events. ACTIVE also makes it easy to learn and prepare for all the things you love to do with expert resources, training plans and fitness calculators.


text:
NEW YORK (November 5, 2012)--Power generators were being hauled in, polling locations moved and voting machines hurriedly put into place as officials prepared Monday to hold the election in storm-ravaged sections of New York and New Jersey barely a week after Superstorm Sandy.
Organizers expressed guarded confidence that the presidential vote will proceed with no major disruptions in most areas hit by the storm, but it was unclear whether the preparations would be enough to avoid depressed turnout in communities where people still lack power or have been driven from their damaged homes.
Some voters will be casting ballots in places different from their usual polls and some polling places will be running on generators and using emergency lights and portable toilets.


text:
FBI: We Couldn't Have Stopped Boston Bombings
(NEWSER) – Even though a tip put Tamerlan Tsarnaev in the FBI's sights prior to the Boston Marathon bombings, there was essentially nothing the agency could have done to prevent the attack, the bureau has determined. A number of internal reviews zeroed in on how a 2011 request from Russia, which asked that the potential radicalization of Tsarnaev be investigated, was handled; law-enforcement sources tell the New York Times that its conclusion stems from these reviews. The meatiest parts of the Times' piece.
- The law held the FBI back. Based on the kind of investigation they were doing, "federal laws and Justice Department protocols" outlawed the use of surveillance tools like wiretapping, preventing a broader investigation into the bomber, reports the Times.
Read the full story on Newser.com
More stories from Newser:
- 26 Passengers Quarantined After Falling Ill on Flight
- Another Climate Change Effect: More Violence
- US' Busiest Executioner Nearly Out of Lethal Drug


text:
Ovarian Cancer Center - Topeka, KS
- WebMD Physician Directory of Topeka Oncologist Doctors
- Related Ovarian Cancer Articles
- Topeka Emergency Contacts
- Nearby Topeka Hospitals
- Find a Local Pharmacy on RxList - Topeka
Topeka Oncologist Doctors for Ovarian Cancer
Type of Physician: Oncologist
What is a Oncologist? A subspecialty certification by the Board of Internal Medicine; the oncologist specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of all types of cancer and other benign and malignant tumors. These subspecialists decide on and administer chemotherapy as well as consult with surgeons and radiotherapists on other treatment for cancer.
Specialty: Oncology (Medical)
Common Name: Cancer Doctor
Oncologist Doctors in Topeka * results
- 2
Mehmood H. Hashmi
Cotton O Neil Clinic
1414 SW 8th Ave
Topeka, KS 66606
(785) 354-5300
- 17 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
- 3
Edwin L. Petrik
Cotton O Neil Clinic
1414 SW 8th Ave
Topeka, KS 66606
(785) 354-5300
- 51 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
- 4
David L. Lee
Olathe Medical Services
20375 W 151st St Ste 208
Olathe, KS 66061
(913) 780-4000
- 32 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
- 5
Eric A. Carlson
Cancer Center Of Kansas
1133 College Ave Ste E112
Manhattan, KS 66502
(785) 320-5725
- 27 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
- 6
Ronald L. Stephens
Lawrence Memorial Hospital Oncology Center
330 Arkansas St Ste 105
Lawrence, KS 66044
(785) 505-2800
- 50 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
- 7
Irfan Jawed
Lawrence Memorial Hospital Oncology Center
330 Arkansas St Ste 105
Lawrence, KS 66044
(785) 505-2800
- 19 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
- 8
Luke Huerter
Lawrence Memorial Hospital Oncology Center
330 Arkansas St Ste 105
Lawrence, KS 66044
(785) 505-2800
- 9 years experience
- 1 office location(s)
Don't see your city? Use the WebMD Physician Directory to expand your search.
Ovarian Cancer
What is ovarian cancer?
The term "ovarian cancer" includes several different types of cancer that all arise from cells of the ovary. Most commonly, tumors arise from the epithelium, or lining cells, of the ovary. These include ...
Other Related Ovarian Cancer Articles
Emergency Contact for Topeka
- In case of Emergency, call 911
Nearby Topeka Hospitals results
- 1Kansas Rehabilitation Hospital
1504 SW 8th Ave
Topeka, Kansas 66606
(785) 235-660
- 2Saint Francis Health Center
1700 SW 7th St
Topeka, Kansas 66606
(785) 295-800
- 3Select Specialty Hospital
1700 SW 7th St Ste 840
Topeka, Kansas 66606
(785) 295-889
- 4Stormont-Vail Hospital
1500 SW 10th Ave
Topeka, Kansas 66604
(785) 354-600
- 5Kansas Neurological Institute
3107 SW 21st St
Topeka, Kansas 66604
(785) 296-538
- 6Easten Kansas Healthcare System
2200 SW Gage Blvd
Topeka, Kansas 66622
(785) 350-311
- 7Lawrence Memorial Hospital
325 Maine St
Topeka, Kansas 66044
(785) 505-610
- 8Jefferson County Memorial Hosp
408 Delaware St
Topeka, Kansas 66097
(913) 774-434
- 9Holton Community Hospital
1110 Columbine Dr
Topeka, Kansas 66436
(785) 364-211
* Provider Directory Terms of Use:
The WebMD 'Provider Directory' is provided by WebMD for use by the general public as a quick reference of information about Providers. The Provider Directory is not intended as a tool for verifying the credentials, qualifications, or abilities of any Provider contained therein. Inclusion in the Provider Directory does not imply recommendation or endorsement nor does omission in the Provider Directory imply WebMD disapproval.
You are prohibited from using, downloading, republishing, selling, duplicating, or "scraping" for commercial or any other purpose whatsoever, the Provider Directory or any of the data listings or other information contained therein, in whole or in part, in any medium whatsoever.
The Provider Directory is provided on an "AS-IS" basis. WebMD disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for particular purpose. Without limiting the foregoing, WebMD does not warrant or represent that the Provider Directory or any part thereof is accurate or complete. You assume full responsibility for the communications with any Provider you contact through the Provider Directory. WebMD shall in no event be liable to you or to anyone for any decision made or action taken by you in the reliance on information provided in the Provider Directory.
The use of WebMD Provider Directory by any entity or individual to verify the credentials of Providers is prohibited. The database of Provider information which drives WebMD Provider Directory does not contain sufficient information with which to verify Provider credentials under the standards of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) of the Utilization Review Accreditation Committee (URAC).
By using the WebMD Provider Directory, you agree to these Terms and Conditions.


text:
Result: Beat UCLA 43-17
Grade: A
Comment: Five weeks of frustration, unleashed. Bruins coach Jim Mora's description of the Bears as "maniacal" was spot on. ... Cal was far more physical than in the dreadful loss to Arizona State. The running backs and receivers broke tackles, the offensive linemen finished blocks, and the defense produced some punishing hits. ... The play-calling was aggressive and creative, resulting in a string of positive gains on first down that kept the Bears out of second/third-and-long situations. ... Tight end Richard Rodgers, finally healthy, produced seven catches for 129 yards and added a needed dimension to the passing game. ... Quarterback Zach Maynard started off with an interception but played exceptionally well the rest of the way: He was accurate (25 of 30) and made smart decisions with the ball.
Next up: at Washington State
The matchup: As a chance to build momentum, it doesn't get much better for the Bears. Washington State is struggling -- its only wins are against Eastern Washington and UNLV -- and the atmosphere in Martin Stadium can hardly be considered intimidating. ... But Cal cannot dawdle. It must take control early and keep the reeling Cougars from developing any confidence. The best means of accomplishing that goal: Avoid turnovers and run the ball effectively.
Result: Beat Arizona 54-48 (OT)
Grade: C
Comment: Sizzling offense, shoddy defense -- not exactly the script we expected. ... Don't read too much into the 54 points, 617 yards, 50 percent conversions on third down and red zone success: Arizona's defense is substandard. If the Cardinal puts up half that many points this week, then it might be time to declare the wobbly offense a thing of the past. ... Quarterback Josh Nunes was terrific Saturday (21 of 34, 360 yards) but rarely had to throw out of rhythm or into narrow windows. ... The past two opponents provided blueprints for future foes to attack the Cardinal: First, Washington stuffed the running game, then Arizona carved up Stanford's highly rated defense. But how many teams are capable of doing both? Oregon may be it.
Next up: at Notre Dame
The matchup: Stanford is a nine-point underdog, which should provide a sense for the challenge in South Bend. ... The Cardinal has won the past three matchups, but this is the best Irish team in that span, by far. ... Both teams play physical defense and prefer the ground-and-pound approach (albeit with different running schemes). It should be close and low scoring, with quarterback play being decisive. Nunes must be more efficient than he was in the loss at Washington.


text:
Historic Shed, a professional builder in the Tampa area, built this amazing shed as a home office. Let's talk about all of the ways that this home office shed is awesome.
+It has a cathedral ceiling. A cathedral ceiling in a shed. See full article.
addressLocation, ST | website.com
The Rolla Daily News - Rolla, MO | therolladailynews.com
Your privacy is important, read our privacy policy.


text:
Assassinations and assaults on journalists continue in Mexico, Honduras and Brazil, while the governments of Ecuador and Argentina have put legal and economic constraints on media, especially those that don't report the government line, according to the group's country-by-country security reports.
The nonprofit press group, which is meeting through Monday in Puebla, said the worst situation is in Mexico, where 127 journalists have been attacked the last 12 years.
IAPA said such incidents have continued under new President Enrique Pena Nieto, who canceled an appearance at the group's conference.
Vice President Armando Castilla detailed attacks over the last six months, including the disappearance of a journalist in San Luis Potosi and two killings, one just last week in the Mexican border town of Ojinaga. The newspapers Diario de Juarez and Siglo de Torreon have also come under attack in recent days.
The most anticipated country report came from Cuban blogger Yoani Sanchez, the first time that the island's report was given by a Cuban journalist.
Cuban journalists and activists walk "a red line between liberty and jail," said Sanchez, a dissident who writes the blog Generation Y.
"Activists and journalist are too often picked up by plain-clothes men.
But Sanchez said that despite constraints by the government, Cubans have found new ways to protest and register their opinions, and more independent journalists are using Internet social media despite little access to such portals in country.


text:
I really liked this article so I thought I'd share it here:
Do you need a miracle in your life?
The Miracle Question
Suppose that tonight while you sleep, a miracle happens and all of your problems are solved. But since you were asleep when the miracle occurred, night, you aren't aware that it even happens. When you wake tomorrow morning, how are you going to discover evidence of that miracle? What will you see yourself doing, thinking, or believing about yourself that will tell you a miracle has happened in your life or business?


text:
Gateway has been doing special runs of discs. The most recent was a run of the new putter, Warlock. Dave ran 250 SSS warlocks for Dynamic Discs.
There was also a larger run of the SSS Wizards ran. This flexability will not be a product that will be available all the time. So if you are into real soft putters, then you have to check these bad boys out.