text:
This report is submitted to the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) for discussion. As a preliminary and pre-decisional work product, it does not necessarily reflect the views of the TGDC or its members.
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) [1] created the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to oversee voting standards work. Reporting to the EAC is the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC), which makes recommendations on voluntary standards and guidelines related to voting equipment. The TGDC in turn created the Auditability Working Group (AWG) to formulate a response to the following charge from the EAC:
Alternatives to Software Independence (SI)—EAC directs the TGDC to develop draft requirements for audit methods to achieve the goal of Software Independence (SI). The goal is to develop requirements for the auditability of the election system without requiring a specific technology. The starting point for these requirements should be the work already completed by NIST on alternatives to SI.
The TGDC furthermore passed the following resolution at its meeting of July 9, 2010:
This report is the AWG's response to that resolution.
The Oxford English Dictionary Online defines neither the noun auditability nor the adjective auditable. The transitive verb audit is defined as "To make an official systematic examination of (accounts), so as to ascertain their accuracy." [2]
As the dictionary definition reflects, these words are used most commonly, but not exclusively, in a financial context.
The August 31, 2007 public review draft of VVSG 2.0 does not define auditability, but the stand-in concept is Software Independence (SI), defined as the quality of a voting system or voting device such that a previously undetected change or fault in software cannot cause an undetectable change or error in election outcome. [3]
Additionally, the glossary of VVSG 2.0 defines the following terms:
audit: Verification of statistical or exact agreement of records from different processes or subsystems of a voting system.
audit device: Voting device dedicated exclusively to processes of verification and/or independent assessment of the performance of the voting system.
Predating the emergence of SI as an architectural category, VVSG 1.0 [4] instead refers to Independent Verification (IV). To provide a complete definition of IV, Section C.1.1 of VVSG 1.0 is reproduced below in its entirety.
Independent Verification is the top-level categorization for electronic voting systems that produce multiple records of ballot selections that can be audited to a high level of precision. For this to happen, the records must be produced and made verifiable by the voter, and then subsequently handled according to the following protocol:
- At least two records of voter selections are produced and one of the records is then stored such that it cannot be modified by the voting system, e.g., the voting system creates a record of voter selections and then copies it to some unalterable media
- The voter must be able to verify that both records are correct, e.g., verify his or her selections on the voting system's display and also verify the second record of selections stored on the unalterable storage media
- The verification processes for the two records must be independent of each other and (a) at least one of the records must be verified directly by the voter, or (b) it is acceptable for the voter to indirectly verify both records if they are stored on independent systems
- The content of the two records can be checked later for consistency through the use of identifiers that allow the records to be linked
An assumption is made that at least one set of records is usable in an efficient counting process such as an automated tabulator, and the other set of records is usable in an efficient process of verifying its agreement with the other set of records used in the counting process. The sets of records would preferentially be different in form and thus have more resistance to accidental or deliberate damage.
Given these conditions, the multiple records are said to be distinct and independently verifiable; that is, both records are not under the control of the same processes. As a result of this independence, one record can be used to audit or check the accuracy of the other record. Because the storage of the records is separate, an attacker who can compromise one of the records still will face a difficult task in compromising the other.
Additionally, the glossary of VVSG 1.0 defines the following terms:
audit: Systematic, independent, documented process for obtaining records, statements of fact or other relevant information and assessing them objectively to determine the extent to which specified requirements are fulfilled
audit trail: Recorded information that allows election officials to review the activities that occurred on the voting equipment to verify or reconstruct the steps followed without compromising the ballot or voter secrecy
audit trail for direct-recording equipment: Paper printout of votes cast, produced by direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machines, which election officials may use to crosscheck electronically tabulated totals
Three reports by Roy Saltman reflect an evolution in the concept of auditability that mirrors the evolution of U.S. voting systems and practices over the years spanned by the reports.
A working group on post-election audits writes, "Two key goals of vote tabulation audits are i) To verify that the election outcomes implied by the reported vote totals are correct, and ii) To provide data for process improvement: specifically, to identify and quantify various causes of discrepancies between voter intentions and the originally reported vote totals." [8]
A League of Women Voters Report on Election Auditing defines an election audit as "a set of procedures designed to investigate whether an election was conducted properly, the voting equipment counted votes accurately, only qualified voters cast ballots in the election, and the rights of eligible citizens to vote and to experience an efficient and fair voting process were respected." [9]
Post-election audits may include comparing the results of a hand-count of paper records with the totals reported by a voting system (e.g., as described at [10]), but they may also be limited to ballot reconciliation, verification of district-wide summations, and similar operations.
The Accounting Terminology Guide of the New York State Society of CPAs defines an audit as "A professional examination of a company's financial statement by a professional accountant or group to determine that the statement has been presented fairly and prepared using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)." [11]
NIST IR 7298, Glossary of Key Information Security Terms, defines an audit as an "Independent review and examination of records and activities to assess the adequacy of system controls, to ensure compliance with established policies and operational procedures, and to recommend necessary changes in controls, policies, or procedures." [12]
The SANS Institute's Glossary of Security Terms defines auditing as "the information gathering and analysis of assets to ensure such things as policy compliance and security from vulnerabilities." [13]
The Windows Server 2003 Glossary defines auditing as "The process that tracks the activities of users by recording selected types of events in the security log of a server or a workstation." [14]
A stub article in Wikipedia states, "Auditability is a non-functional requirement and concerns the transparency of a system with regards to external audits." [15] It is interesting that this unsourced definition specifies external audits, but not the nature of those audits (e.g., financial or security). The auditability article is linked with the subject of systems engineering and an article on the general social/organizational concept of transparency, but includes a "see also" link to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Auditability: The transparency of a voting system with regards to the ability to verify that it has operated correctly in an election, and to identify the cause if it has not.
The following subsections explore different voting system characteristics that logically relate to the auditability of the system. A voting system need not have all of these characteristics to be called auditable; however, requirements for voting system auditability would directly or indirectly mandate some subset of these characteristics.
A voter reviewing the output of a voting system in any form is able to detect errors in that output. However, the power of this "audit" depends on the relationship of that output to the records of the voting system, the nature and intended use of those records, and whether that output is itself a record. For example:
Much work has been done on the properties of different types of voter verification and voter-verifiable records. In the case of ballots, it is frequently argued that direct verification by voters is necessary to provide sufficient assurance that the voting system's records properly record the votes that the voter intended to cast.
To reduce confusion about what sort of verification is intended in different places in this report, the following terms will be used in lieu of the overused term voter verification:
Cast verification: Verification by the voter that a cast vote record, such as a ballot or a VVPAT printout, is consistent with the voter's intent. For example, visual inspection of an optical scan ballot qualifies as cast verification. Cast verification is subdivided into direct verification, in which the voter's own senses suffice to inspect the ballot of record (e.g., visual inspection of an optical scan ballot), and indirect verification, in which some voting device must intercede to render the ballot into a form that the voter can inspect (e.g., any inspection of an electronic record).
Read verification: Verification by the voter that the interpretation of a cast vote record by a tabulator is consistent with the voter's intent. For example, in an optical scan system, read verification requires that the optical scanner present the voter with an unambiguous representation of the votes that it detected on the optical scan ballot.
Count verification: Verification by the voter that the published election results include the votes from that voter's ballot.
Not to be confused with these terms is Independent Verification (IV), the architectural category of voting systems that was defined in Section 2.1.3.
A system may enable the detection of errors using independent records that can be compared against one another for consistency. What constitutes independence (or sufficient independence) is debatable and largely depends on the specific nature and intended use of the records in question.
Ordinary ballot accounting, in which the number of ballots cast is balanced against the number of voters who checked into the polling place and compared with the number of registered voters, is a simple example of an audit technique based on comparison of independent records.
One form of integrity checking is the validation of input entering the system to ensure that the input is self-consistent and consistent with the state of the voting system. Another form is the creation of additional records, such as digital signatures, that can be used after the fact to test the integrity of the signed records. Each of these techniques enables the detection of certain kinds of errors. However, neither validation of input nor digital signing of records would detect an error where the record created by the voting system was inconsistent with the input from the voter.
Inasmuch as errors may be traceable to violations of security policies, improperly executed procedures, or other anomalies, routine operational event logging is an aid to auditing.
Detecting the existence of errors (e.g., noticing a discrepancy between two totals) is easier than identifying the cause of those errors (e.g., Precinct 5 uploaded unofficial totals with the wrong Precinct ID number). Thus, it is entirely possible for a voting system to be transparent about the existence of errors but opaque to narrowing down what went wrong. A voting system that maintains additional records that are useful in identifying the causes of discrepancies is more auditable than an otherwise equivalent voting system that does not maintain such records.
Just as diagnosing faults is harder than detecting errors, correcting errors is harder than diagnosing faults. Knowing what went wrong does not ensure that the available records are sufficient to reconstruct the correct answer. While a catastrophe of a magnitude sufficient to destroy every record of one or more ballots is always possible, a voting system that maintains additional records that are useful in reconciling discrepancies is more auditable than an otherwise equivalent voting system that does not maintain any additional records.
To establish high confidence that the reconciliation of a discrepancy is correct, it is generally necessary to locate the cause of the discrepancy and trace its impact so that the correct result can be extracted. In cases where one record is significantly more trustworthy than another, the decision can be taken to discard the less trustworthy record without locating the cause, but to do so calls into question the value of creating multiple records in the first place.
To be worthwhile, a recount must enable the correction of errors in the original count.
Any capability to ascertain the accuracy of a system is compromised if there is intractable uncertainty about what the true or correct result would be under the best of circumstances. One can therefore argue that a voting system that accepts ambiguous inputs from voters is less auditable than an otherwise equivalent voting system that requires voters to commit to an unambiguous representation of their votes when the ballot is cast.
Audit records must not be intentionally destroyed (e.g., to reclaim storage), nor unintentionally destroyed, nor modified, nor permitted to degrade enough to introduce new errors, for the duration of the retention period that is specified by law. A voting system whose records are prone to deterioration would be less auditable than an otherwise equivalent voting system that creates shelf-stable, archival records. The Voluntary Voting System Guidelines currently in effect already require the memory or media used for storage of voting and audit data to have "demonstrated error-free data retention" for 22 months.
Although the meaning of auditability is different in the jargon of computer security, security is a prerequisite for maintaining the integrity of audit records. The records that are to be used to ascertain the accuracy of the system must themselves be protected from manipulation.
Work on small-batch auditing methods has focused on designing post-election audits that demonstrate to a known level of confidence that the winner of an election would not change in a full recount while minimizing the number of ballots that must be recounted to achieve this. [16] To audit a ballot in this sense generally means to compare an optical scan ballot with the corresponding electronic cast vote record or to manually recount a small batch of ballots and compare the results with a report for that batch.
A voting system that enables the votes from a small batch of ballots or a single isolated ballot to be traced through the system without needing to recount many other ballots in the same geographic or political reporting unit allows a risk-limiting audit to be performed at greatly reduced expense, and is thus arguably more auditable than an otherwise equivalent system that does not support sampling.
A prerequisite for single-ballot auditing is the ability to identify a single ballot. If there are multiple records of a ballot, they must share an identifier to enable the corresponding records to be matched up.
Architectures in current use that need no explanation include optical scan, DRE, and VVPAT. Alternative architectures have previously been explored in [7], in Volume I, Appendix C of VVSG 1.0 [4], and in a NIST report to the EAC [17]. Proposed methods of achieving (or attempting to achieve) auditability without necessarily requiring paper records have included the following:
An additional paper-based variant that was identified in the Auditability Working Group will herein be called Lossy VVPAT, or LVVPAT. LVVPAT is VVPAT except that an independent voter-verifiable record is generated for only a subset of voting sessions according to a sampling strategy implemented by the voting system itself, and the ability to conduct an audit using that sample is fully supported.
While much could be written about the auditability characteristics of older architectures such as lever machines and punch cards, that discussion would not advance the goals of the present effort.
An evaluation of the known modern architectures with respect to auditability and tradeoffs is shown in Table 1.
|Op scan
|Split process
|E2E crypto
|Audit port
|Error detection
|Direct verification, post-election audit
|Indirect verification, integrity checks, event logs
|Direct verification, post-election audit, integrity checks, event logs
|Direct verification by a selected sample, post-election audit, integrity checks, event logs
|Indirect verification, post-election audit, event logs
|Post-election audit, event logs
|Count verification
|Depends on what connected
|Independent recount (possibly automated)
|Contingent on defensive programming and design
|VVPAT adds another record but also more points of failure
|Less than VVPAT
|Multiple devices and token make diagnosis more difficult
|If witness device is sufficiently transparent and simple, should help diagnose faults in the other device
|Depends on what connected
|Error correction
|Independent recount (possibly automated); no recovery if ballots are unreadable or destroyed
|Duplicate electronic records allow recovery in case records are damaged but no recovery if votes were misrecorded
|Reconstruct from VVPAT
|Less than VVPAT
|Reconstruct from tokens
|Reconstruct from witness record
|Duplicate electronic records allow recovery in case records are damaged but no recovery if all copies fail cryptographic validation
|Depends on what connected
|Vote disambiguation
|Requires support for read verification
|Sampling audit
|Depends on ballot identification and reporting capabilities
|Depends on ballot identification and reporting capabilities
|Depends on ballot identification and reporting capabilities
|Yes, but sampling strategy should be auditor's prerogative, not determined in advance
|Depends on ballot identification and reporting capabilities
|Depends on ballot identification and reporting capabilities
|Yes (by voters)
|Depends on ballot identification and reporting capabilities
|Multiple independent cast vote records
|Only for sample
|Contingent on independence of vote capture and verification stations, integrity of tokens
|Contingent on the transparency of the witness device
|Depends on what connected
|Persistence of records
|Unique paper record subject to deterioration
|Electronic records with back-ups; easier to preserve but also easier to lose
|Both paper and electronic records; some insurance in having different types of records with different modes of failure
|Electronic records with back-ups; paper for sample only
|Token supposedly unalterable
|Depends on type of witness device
|Depends on specific design
|Depends on what connected
|Protection of the sole record; ballot stuffing, chain voting, etc.
|No direct verification; no independent record; requires secure and trustworthy software
|VVPAT operational issues may cast false doubt on results
|Predetermined sampling limits power of audit
|No direct verification; requires independence of vote capture and verification stations, high-integrity tokens; common vulnerabilities of vote capture and verification stations
|No direct verification; requires trustworthy witness devices, transparent witness records
|Requires correctly implemented cryptography
|Depends on what connected, protection of the audit port
|Access features difficult to provide from paper ballot; must convert print to alternative forms and eliminate paper handling
|Wide variety of access features can be readily provided from digital form of electronic ballot. No paper handling required.
|Access features difficult to provide from VVPAT; must convert print to alternative forms when VVPAT is or can be ballot of record
|Not actually improved versus VVPAT but possibly more legally defensible since cast verification is not guaranteed to sighted voters1
|Depends on form of token. When token is paper, access features are difficult to deliver. When token is electronic, access features can more readily be provided but handling of token can still be access barrier. Both vote capture and verification stations must be accessible.
|So long as the voter is not verifying the secondary archival record, no access features would be needed
|Depends on form of voter verification. Whatever media is used by the voter to verify (paper, web site, etc.) would need to be made accessible.
|Depends on what is connected and if the voter is verifying the output of the attached device. Paper output will be more difficult to make accessible than digital output.
|Ballots often marked incorrectly by voters
|Potentially best available but depends on user interface design
|Usability for audit tends to be poor
|Some voters get DRE experience, others get VVPAT experience
|Two-stage process may be unintuitive
|Same as DRE
|Process and added complexity not intuitive to the voter or poll worker
|Depends on what connected
|Current accepted practice
|Current accepted practice
|Paper rolls record sequence of ballots
|An appropriate sampling strategy can improve privacy versus VVPAT
|Combined issues of DRE + token (maybe paper) + verification
|Potential to record sequence of ballots or (worst case) photograph the voter
|Possibly enhanced by obfuscation of choices
|Depends on what connected
|System complexity (lower is better)
|2 (accessible voting station + scanner)
|2 (DRE + printer) or 3 (+ readback from printout)
|3 or 4 (... + overhead of having a variable process for the voting session)
|2 (vote capture + verification station)
|2 (vote capture + witness device)
|2 (vote capture + cryptographic overhead)
|Depends on what connected
VVPAT has seen significant deployment as a retrofit to improve the auditability of paperless DREs. It remains of particular interest as a compromise that offers the SI level of auditability combined with the efficiency of electronic voting in what some see a best-of-both-worlds merger. On the other hand, perhaps because of the experience that has been gained from the use of VVPAT in practice, issues with VVPAT have been identified from practically every angle, making worst-of-both-worlds a plausible evaluation as well:
The minimum cost to jurisdictions of following the VVPAT path is significantly impacted by whether the as-yet unimplemented capability to provide an audio verification from the content of the paper audit trail alone is required. In 2003, the Department of Justice responded to an inquiry with an opinion that readback from the paper audit trail was not required. [19] However, that decision was based on the assumption that the paper ballot was merely a contemporaneous record, not an official ballot. Since that time, some jurisdictions have designated the paper audit trail to be an official ballot or a controlling ballot of record used for recount, in which case VVSG 1.0 requires the voting system to enable visually impaired voters and voters with an unwritten language to verify the paper record itself.
No VVPAT devices have entered the certification process since VVSG 1.0 became effective.
While VVPAT is a retrofit to make DREs more auditable, Electronically-assisted Ballot Markers (EBMs) could be characterized as an assistive technology add-on to make optical scan ballots more accessible.
For the tasks of navigating through a ballot and marking vote selections, EBMs have the same capabilities as DREs; the level of accessibility that they provide for these tasks is therefore not an issue. However, the accessibility of other tasks associated with the use of EBMs remains a concern.
The interpretation of federal law as it applies to the accessibility of optical scan ballots remains an active and contentious debate with numerous details yet to be ruled on. The eventual cost to jurisdictions that follow the path of opscan plus EBM rather than opscan plus DRE will depend on those rulings. The working group has identified the following EBM issues based on its own understanding of applicable law and requirements, which may or may not be consistent with what is officially determined later:
Vote-by-phone is typically used as an accessibility supplement for optical scan or other paper-based voting systems. A voter in a polling place can vote by calling a central service and navigating an audio ballot from a standard land-line telephone. The marked ballot can then be printed or stored in final form as an electronic vote record. In jurisdictions that use optical scan ballot counting, poll workers frequently copy the vote record onto an optical scan ballot to be counted.
Vote-by-phone is not to be confused with remote electronic voting from home or other locations—the voter must still be checked in by poll workers, and all other regular polling place procedures and safeguards apply.
In the absence of additional accessibility supplements, vote-by-phone responds only to the need for non-visual access. The wide range of other accommodations that are supported by DREs and EBMs—simultaneous audio and video presentation, high-contrast and/or large font display, easily distinguishable controls, a range of different input methods—is not available for vote-by-phone. This leaves a significant proportion of people with disabilities either without accommodation or with less than the best accommodation available. Nevertheless, vote-by-phone has been accepted in some jurisdictions as a remedy to bring paper-based systems into compliance with Section 301 of HAVA (e.g., see [20]).
The auditability of vote-by-phone depends on the implementation of the central service. It might or might not create a paper audit trail; it might or might not support an audio readback of that audit trail. One existing implementation supports a mode of operation in which the ballot is faxed back to the location of the voter. If this faxed copy were designated the ballot of record, then direct verification and observational testing would be possible. However, the same accessibility concerns that exist for EBMs and for VVPAT where the paper trail is the ballot of record would then also apply to the verification of this fax received at the polling place.
Parallel testing is arguably an audit method that can be used on any kind of voting system. It does not audit the records of the voting system but rather its behavior under test conditions. By carefully controlling those test conditions to deprive the voting system of ways to detect whether it is in a test voting or real voting use, one can gain some confidence that the behavior of the voting system in real voting use should be correct.
Concerns with the effectiveness of the approach center on the feasibility and practicality of depriving the voting system of any way to detect whether it is under test. There is an arms race between the complexity of the testing and the complexity of malicious logic that would be needed in the voting system for a software-based fraud to avoid detection.
Since parallel testing is entirely procedural and can be applied to any voting system, it would not result in any new requirements on voting systems in the VVSG. Requirements of the form "The voting system shall not be capable of telling whether it is being parallel tested," while well-intentioned, would be impossible to verify. Thus, from the perspective of making voting systems more auditable, a recommendation for parallel testing would be inert.
The software assurance alternative does not provide a means to audit the records of the election, but instead tries to reduce the likelihood that an error would be recorded in the first place. The idea is to do whatever it takes for voting system software to earn the trust and confidence of all stakeholders. This may simply be impossible, as trust cannot be forced. However, any approach powerful enough to convince an audience of computer scientists would require invasive and expensive changes to the development process for voting systems, in order to deliver strong evidence that the system as certified and deployed was correct. As a corollary, existing systems that were developed under a different process would no longer be certifiable.
Like Software Independence, software assurance perhaps puts too narrow a focus on software. What is more desirable is an assurance case for the entire voting system, of which software is only one part.
The August 31, 2007 public review draft of VVSG 2.0 [3] included a provision by which a voting system that achieved Software Independence without the use of independent, directly verifiable records could be certified as a so-called "innovation class submission." As the innovation class is not actually an architecture, but rather a process by which presently unknown, new architectures could be considered, it adds nothing to the alternatives previously discussed.
Attempts to reach consensus on alternatives to Software Independence have been unsuccessful because of conflicting positions regarding requirements for direct verification and the level of risk determined to be acceptable.
Software Independence is defined as the quality of a voting system or voting device such that a previously undetected change or fault in software cannot cause an undetectable change or error in election outcome. [3]
Computer security specialists who have concluded that software errors and exploits form one of the most critical classes of risks faced by voting systems cannot recommend the use of any voting system that does not mitigate it robustly. Software Independence is phrased as a goal that, when achieved, robustly mitigates that risk.
Direct verifiability of all cast vote records has been most commonly identified as the mechanism to achieve the goal of Software Independence. However, direct verification of paper ballots (optical scan ballots or VVPAT) cannot be done by many voters with visual disabilities and voters lacking fine motor skills or the use of their hands. Voters whose language is unwritten or who are illiterate will also have difficulties with direct verification.
Although the requirement for Software Independence neither specifies a technology nor excludes alternative technologies that achieve the same goal, given currently available technology and the state of the practice, this requirement would encourage near universal deployment of optical scan systems without features that convert complete paper ballot print content into accessible forms or a paper-handling workaround for limited dexterity. Not even strict conformance to the latest proposed VVSG 1.1 or 2.0 would ensure this accessibility. Although gaps and ambiguities in the requirements can be closed, controversial interpretations of the accessibility requirements that were already in VVSG 1.0 have caused the disability community to view the draft requirements and delivery of truly accessible paper-based voting in general with renewed skepticism. To overcome this skepticism, requirements for the accessibility of paper-based voting would need to become significantly more prescriptive to prevent any possible misinterpretation or misapplication of the requirements by system designers and certifiers—a different approach than has been used thus far.
Some election officials feel that the costs of Software Independence are insufficiently justified because risks that are possibly comparable to those that SI mitigates in electronic voting systems have long been tolerated in paper-based systems. For example, voters using central count and manual count paper ballot systems have no direct assurance that their ballots will be protected from alteration or tabulated as expected. For such systems to have been accepted in practice implies a level of trust in the voting process than is not evident in the rationale for SI. In the absence of a comparable effort to address comparable issues in paper-based voting systems, SI's focus on risks that are specific to electronic voting systems gives the appearance of a double standard of trust.
In response, many computer scientists argue that directly verifiable paper records are inherently more transparent, and therefore inherently more trustworthy, than electronic records. To convince an observer that an electronic record is correct and will remain so, or that an electronic audit record has validity that is independent of the validity of the main cast vote record, is inherently more difficult. It has been said that the purpose of an election is not to convince the winners that they won (as the winners rarely complain), but rather to convince the losers, and their supporters, that they lost fair and square. Software Independence allows the losers and their supporters to confirm that voting equipment operated properly: it gives voters an opportunity to check that the vote-capture equipment recorded their votes as they intended, and it gives observers an opportunity to check that the tabulation equipment counted those records accurately. That observation process does not require trust in software or other complex technology, and can be explained to citizens who are not specialists in information technology.
A decision to require Software Independence would ensure the ability in certified voting systems to audit that votes were recorded as cast. However, unless and until there are accepted ways of achieving Software Independence without direct verifiability, it would come at the cost of reducing the range of voting systems that could be certified to include only those with paper cast vote records, and complicating the accommodation of voters with disabilities. In addition, there would appear to be little incentive for investment in research and development of electronic voting systems absent some commitment of federal resources or new legal requirements. Furthermore, a mandate for paper cast vote records would impact implementation of early voting, super precinct voting and other innovative voting processes that seek to ease access to the ballot.
A review of Table 1 and the definition of Software Independence shows that the only known approach with high potential to achieve Software Independence without the use of paper cast vote records is end-to-end cryptography. Even so, end-to-end cryptography based voting systems are not necessarily free of paper, and research stage systems do not always take accessibility into account.
The draft of VVSG 2.0 provides no clear certification path for end-to-end-systems (only the innovation class process). In that context, end-to-end systems might in some sense be considered an "alternative to SI" that responds to the working group's charge, even though they are assumed to be SI.
The Independent Verification concept that was partially developed in the VVSG 1.0 timeframe potentially leads to a less restrictive set of requirements than does Software Independence. A review of the definition in Section 2.1.3 shows that it can be satisfied without paper if two indirectly verified records are stored on independent systems. This implementation path was based on the practice of dual control, which is an internal control that is used in both financial and security contexts. By requiring two independent actors to cooperate in a process, dual control mitigates the risk posed by a single rogue actor and increases the difficulty of committing fraud without being detected. For an obvious fraud to occur, the theory goes, the two actors would need to be in collusion.
However, later work on Independent Verification in the VVSG 2.0 timeframe uncovered different expectations regarding how much independence is necessary to mitigate the critical risks and how such independence could be demonstrated. For example, if it is plausible that the software for two devices that were developed by different manufacturers working in complete isolation from one another could share a dependency on a common COTS library, and that such a library could contain an exploitable fault, then the independence of the manufacturers from one another is ineffective at mitigating the threat posed by faulty library code. Furthermore, since there is no process to certify an incomplete voting system that meets only some of the VVSG's requirements, the independence of separately developed devices would be compromised by the need for them to go through the certification process together. Such problems were the primary reasons that IV was abandoned in favor of SI in the VVSG 2.0 draft.
Lesser reasons included the sense that IV was possibly specifying a solution without identifying the real requirement, as described in the following paragraph from a draft white paper [21]:
As a primary concept for use in the VVSG 2007, ID/IDV misses the mark in that it describes a technique to achieve software-independence but does not focus on the problem it is attempting to address, that being the inability to verify complex software in voting systems. Consequently, arguments for or against it have focused more on issues concerning voter-verification of paper records, e.g., the additional cost of VVPAT systems and the usefulness of the paper records in audits. We assert that the term software-dependence better focuses the argument on the difficulty and expense of evaluating complex code and subsequently trusting that it doesn't contain errors or that the voting system software has not been tampered with.
Some computer scientists raise concerns about the transparency of Independent Verification, arguing that the Independent Verification concept has not been demonstrated to provide meaningful levels of transparency or auditability. A typical observer will not have any good way to confirm whether the equipment provides sufficient independence, and thus no good way to verify that the vote-capture records that were tabulated accurately reflect the voter's intentions. As a result, with Independent Verification, observers have no convincing way to verify for themselves that the voting equipment worked properly. In this sense, Independent Verification provides less transparency and auditability than Software Independence. Thus, a risk of Independent Verification, compared to Software Independence, is that it could lead to reduced trust in election outcomes. However, Independent Verification would provide more transparency and auditability than paperless DREs.
A secondary risk of Independent Verification is that it may not provide adequate levels of security against sophisticated attacks, such as those based upon viral spread of malicious code.
On the other hand, those election officials who are skeptical that the benefits of SI justify its costs are hopeful that a better balance could be found with paperless approaches to IV. For the kinds of errors that would be detectable by SI but not detectable by IV, the probability of occurrence is debatable; the justification for the added cost and inconvenience of managing paper records is correspondingly weakened. Some therefore see IV as a compromise that would improve auditability without going too far in trying to address threats that are theoretical in nature.
A decision to require Independent Verification as defined, but not required, in VVSG 1.0 would raise the bar for auditability to where a DRE with no independent record could no longer be certified, but it would not "robustly mitigate" the risks posed by software errors and exploits in voting systems.
Lossy SI essentially means LVVPAT would be a minimally conforming architecture. "True" SI architectures would also conform, going beyond the minimal requirements.
LVVPAT attempts to avoid overt discrimination against voters with disabilities by randomly denying voter verification to everyone else, rather than by making verification accessible. Compared to VVPAT, LVVPAT does not provide better usability or additional features for any disabled voter, so any accessibility advantage attributed to it would be purely a legal technicality.
LVVPAT does not satisfy the definition of SI or IV; nor does it preserve enough records to enable recovery from a software fault if one is discovered. It does, however, enable a statistical statement of confidence in the results if a sampling audit finds no errors. For assuring the integrity of the electronic records, this is a net gain over what is possible for DREs that have no paper audit trail at all; but the fact that the auditor is not free to select the sample means that the independence of the audit is questionable.
A decision to require a paper audit trail for only some voters would draw the line on what is certifiable between LVVPAT and paperless DREs and thereby mandate a marginal improvement in auditability over what is required by VVSG 1.0. However, since VVPAT is simpler and more auditable than LVVPAT, with no genuine difference to accessibility, the only reason to prefer this alternative over SI would be possibly to conserve paper.
As shown in Table 1, the only modern voting system architectures that would be impacted by a decision between a requirement for Independent Verification and the requirements of VVSG 1.0 are LVVPAT and the paperless DRE.
The main shortcoming of paperless DREs is in transparency and auditability: they do not provide the capacity for observers, or election officials, to confirm for themselves that the voting equipment worked properly in any particular election. As a result, errors and failures of the equipment may go undetected, which can lead to significant undetected errors in the vote tally. This issue has led to an increasing number of change-overs to optical scan or VVPAT despite the DRE's advantages for accessibility and architectural simplicity, and significant sunk costs.
Lacking the market demand, regulatory infrastructure, or resources to develop a new generation of DREs according to a disciplined process of software assurance, parallel testing is the only known approach to mitigating the risks of software errors and exploits in paperless DREs, and there remain concerns both theoretical and practical over the degree to which it can accomplish that goal. On the theoretical side, many computer security specialists are uncomfortable with relying on parallel testing alone as the only defense against these threats because of the limitations that were described in Section 5.1. On the practical side, parallel testing is a procedure that is outside the scope of certification, and the inherent complexity of conducting an effective parallel test puts pressure on election officials to minimize or eliminate that cost.
A decision to keep requirements as they are in VVSG 1.0 would avoid any reduction of the options available to jurisdictions; however, the value of maintaining a standard of auditability that is lower than what most jurisdictions are already requiring on their own is questionable.
Surveys of the public have shown a significant fraction of the voting population has concerns over the accuracy of computerized voting equipment. [22] The possibility of undetected error in any election is unlikely to reassure those with concerns. Therefore, a risk of continuing to allow paperless DREs is that it is likely to contribute to reduced trust among some segments of the population.
Hybrid voting systems provide two or more different kinds of vote-capture devices in every polling place.
The particular case of providing a single accessible voting station in polling places where voting otherwise takes place using a non-accessible method was specifically allowed in Section 301 of HAVA as a way of making every polling place accessible without requiring immediate replacement of all existing paper-based voting systems. The accessible voting station could be a DRE, VVPAT, EBM, or vote-by-phone. However, VVPAT and EBM-based hybrids would conform to a requirement for SI, so nothing new would result from discussing them further. To create a separate alternative for VVSG requirements, we must assume that one kind of device would be SI but not necessarily accessible, while another kind would be accessible but not necessarily SI: in other words, a DRE or vote-by-phone based hybrid.
While adding an accessible voting station to an otherwise non-accessible voting system improves accessibility, it is detrimental to the system's usability by election officials, since poll workers then need to be trained in the operation of two completely different vote-capture methods. More generally, the engineering advantage of being able to design different vote-capture devices to match the capabilities of different voters, rather than requiring one device to be all things to all people, is offset by the operational disadvantage of having to deploy and manage more different types of equipment in every polling place.
In terms of transparency and auditability, hybrid systems that use DREs as the accessible voting station offer an intermediate point between paperless DREs and SI. As with LVVPAT, only a subset of voting sessions get a paper record. However, in contrast to LVVPAT, the determination of whether a particular voting session is recorded on paper is made outside the system (preferably, but not necessarily, by the voter).
For vote-by-phone hybrids, unless the fax-back option is implemented, transparency and auditability from the voter's perspective are limited by the fact that all interaction occurs remotely. If a paper record is created only at the central location, the vote-by-phone voter cannot observe it directly. However, depending on implementation details, an audit trail created only at the central location could still yield a stronger capability for internal audits than would be possible for a DRE-based hybrid.
A decision to require a DRE or vote-by-phone based hybrid system, or something equivalent, as a minimally conforming architecture would mean that the VVSG could no longer uniformly require a particular level of performance from all vote-capture devices. It would instead have to require that voting systems be comprised of particular acceptable mixtures of different kinds of devices that meet different sets of requirements. Some jurisdictions might feel that this encroaches on their prerogative to determine the allocation of equipment to polling places.
If it were decided instead to require the lowest common denominator of performance uniformly from vote-capture devices, then in context of the VVSG the entire discussion of hybrid systems would be out of scope. The VVSG requirements would simply remain unchanged from 1.0, and the decision to deploy a hybrid system rather than an all-DRE system would remain a jurisdictional prerogative.
At a time when the migration of the market was away from optical scan and toward DREs, requiring at least one accessible voting station per polling place in jurisdictions that otherwise would have had none at all would have seemed a progressive policy. However, in the context of a market that is now migrating in the opposite direction, the exact same voting system leaves many disabled voters feeling segregated and marginalized, particularly if the accessible voting station is used only by disabled voters.
A hybrid system in which there was an adequate number of vote-capture devices of both sorts at every polling place, giving all voters the choice, would mitigate the feelings of segregation. Unfortunately, from the perspective of SI supporters, having one non-SI device per polling place would already be a strained compromise, acceptable only because the proportion of voters using the non-SI devices would presumably be small. If the proportion of voters using non-SI devices became significant, the result would be not a compromise, but an effective abandonment of SI.
This report has summarized the current understandings of the members of the Auditability Working Group with respect to the definition of auditability, the characteristics that an auditable voting system would possess, and the relative auditability and tradeoffs inherent in the known universe of modern voting system architectures. In addition, it has clarified the impacts of a decision for or against requiring Software Independence, Independent Verification, and several other alternatives. Once a choice among these alternatives has been made, a set of testable requirements can be derived.
[1] Help America Vote Act of 2002. Public Law 107-252, October 29, 2002.
[2] Oxford English Dictionary Online, http://www.oed.com/, Oxford University Press, July 2010.
[3] Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Recommendations to the Election Assistance Commission, August 31, 2007, http://vote.nist.gov/vvsg-report.htm.
[4] Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Version 1.0 (2005), http://www.eac.gov/testing_and_certification/voluntary_voting_system_guidelines.aspx.
[5] Roy G. Saltman, "Effective Use of Computing Technology in Vote-Tallying," NBSIR 75-687, March 1975.
[6] Roy G. Saltman, "Accuracy, Integrity, and Security in Computerized Vote-Tallying," NBS Special Publication 500-158, August 1988.
[7] Roy G. Saltman, "Independent Verification: Essential Action to Assure Integrity in the Voting Process," August 22, 2006.
[8] Correspondence dated 2009-10-29, available at http://electionaudits.org/niststatement.
[9] Report on Election Auditing by the Election Audits Task Force of the League of Women Voters of the United States, January 2009.
[10] Pam Smith and Bob Kibrick, "Manual Audit Requirements," http://www.verifiedvoting.org/article.php?id=5816, July 2010.
[11] "Audit," in Accounting Terminology Guide, The Web Site of the New York State Society of CPAs, http://www.nysscpa.org/glossary/term/683, July 2010.
[12] NIST IR 7298, Glossary of Key Information Security Terms, April 25, 2006.
[13] "Auditing," in SANS Glossary of Security Terms, http://www.sans.org/security-resources/glossary-of-terms/, July 2010.
[14] "Auditing," in Windows Server 2003 Glossary, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc736725%28WS.10%29.aspx, updated March 7, 2008.
[15] "Auditability," in Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Auditability&oldid=324628641, as of July 19, 2010, 15:36 GMT.
[16] Small Batch Election Auditing Methods Meeting, https://sites.google.com/site/electionaudits/small-batch, July 2010.
[17] "EAC Research Areas for the TGDC VVSG Recommendations," NIST Voting Team, January 2009, http://www.eac.gov/assets/1/Page/NIST%20Response%20to%20Resolutions%20Adopted%20by%20EAC%20Boards.pdf.
[18] Stephen N. Goggin and Michael D. Byrne, "An Examination of the Auditability of Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) Ballots," EVT'07 2007 USENIX/ACCURATE Electronic Voting Technology Workshop, August 6, 2007, http://www.usenix.org/events/evt07/tech/full_papers/goggin/goggin_html/.
[19] Whether Certain Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems Comply with the Help America Vote Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, October 10, 2003, http://www.justice.gov/olc/drevotingsystems.htm.
[20] United States v. State of Maine (D. Me. 2006) consent decree, http://www.justice.gov/crt/voting/hava/maine_cd.php.
[21] Ronald L. Rivest and John P. Wack, "On the notion of software independence in voting systems," draft white paper, 2006-07-28, http://vote.nist.gov/SI-in-voting.pdf.
[22] "Poll: Voters Want Paper Trail," Wired.com, August 25, 2004, http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2004/08/64700.
1 A legal review would be needed to determine whether any given LVVPAT design is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other applicable law. The functionality would need to be implemented in a non-discriminatory way.


text:
$util.date("MMMM d, yyyy",$topLevel.timeZone)
The Final Four wasn't the only event going on in Atlanta last weekend.
The Atlanta Skeeball league held its winter playoffs as well.
Here are some of the sights and sounds.
Click Here to access the online Public Inspection File
Viewers with disabilities can get assistance accessing this station's FCC Public Inspection File by contacting the station with the information listed below. Questions or concerns relating to the accessibility of the FCC's online public file system should be directed to the FCC at 888-225-5322, 888-835-5322 (TTY), or firstname.lastname@example.com.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Evening Wrap-up
Some of this has already been reported in the previous thread, but rumor has it that there are a few jerks out there who don't read every comment of every thread. I can't imagine who would be such a loser, it's just something I heard...
For those ignorant non-message board reading unwashed masses, I sadly report that Henry Blanco's brother has been murdured in Venezuela. Carlos Blanco had been kidnapped two weeks earlier and held for ransom. For several years now, Venezuelan players in MLB have had cause to worry about their families' safety back home. Before making news for his attempt to use a machette to, uh, creatively beat out the fire he had started by dousing five employees with gasoline, Ugueth Urbina had to cope with his mother's kidnapping. The personal security measures that Venezuelan players have felt compelled to take since then are eye-opening. Our sympathies are with the Blanco family.
Our sympathies are also with Dusty Baker, if he thinks Kerry Wood will sign with Cincinatti in order to serve as set-up guy to Francisco Cordero.
The latest rah-rah piece from Muskat informs us that the Cubs like their current roster as they enter the winter meetings. As well they should.
Finally, there's some phony-baloney corporate-sponsored baseball awards that the fans can vote on, and that carry about as much weight and meaning as your vote on ratemypoo.com (I didn't link to it, on the grounds that no good could possibly come of it.)
My votes:
Speaking of Wood
Re: Evening Wrap-up
That list of defensive plays was pretty non-inspiring. I would have to go with Ramirez.
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Whatever you do, don't look at the Top 20 for ratemypoo.com. I haven't felt that nauseated since the Cubs resigned Neifi Perez.
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Trans finally comes up with his first post since God knows when and rating poo immediately rises to the surface. what gives?
Re: Evening Wrap-up
White sox trade Vasquez to the Braves:
Vasquez and Logan for Tyler Flowers, infielder Brent Lillibridge, Class-A third baseman Jon Gilmore and 20-year-old left-hander Santos Rodriguez.
see below:
Now what does that mean the Braves are out of the Peavy sweepstakes...does that mean we are it or you think this is one of the two pitchers they are targeting....or is this the trade and the other is a free agent...
The winter meetings should be interesting!
Re: Evening Wrap-up
the braves have already stated that they are moving on and will not pursue a trade for Peavy. this is just further proof of that.
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Vazquez costs more than Peavy over the next couple of years. I'm sure that the Padres aren't interested in him. I doubt the Pads are interested in Boone Logan either.
It looks like Hendry is working overtime for a quality pitching prospect.
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Obviously i wasn't talking about Vasquez going to the Padres....was talking about the prospects that the Braves gave up for him that may have gone to the Padres for Peavy.
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Ah, the internet.
On the one hand, millions of people desperate for change used the internet to help donate over a billion dollars to get Barack Obama elected.
On the other hand, there's a website for rating poo.
Re: millions of "people?" donated over a $billon$ to Obama
Yeah, just your average folks. People like Dahsudhu Hdusahfd of Df, Hawaii with the following employer CZXVC/ZXVZXV and Uadhshgu Hduadh listed as living in Dhff, Florida employed by DASADA/SAFASF donated big bucks to Obama.
It was an inspirational outpouring. Go internet!
Re: millions of "people?" donated over a $billon$ to Obama
yeah, that 7 grand accounts for a good 90%+ of the money raised online.
i guess most of the money did come from corruption rather than joe everyman.
*runs around screaming about 9/11 conspiracies and impending socialism he read about on the internet*
lulz...internet...i've been there.
Re: millions of "people?" donated over a $billon$ to Obama
Those funds were returned. Every election both major parties deal with this. There were similar stories out of the McCain camp. There is nothing to stop citizens from contributing under fake names or giving more than the maximum allowable amounts. I could go online and donate $500 each day for 10 days to a campaign via credit card. It is then up to the campaign and the FEC to realize later that I gave more in total than I was allowed and then refund me the difference. It's not a perfect system by any means, but for the most part it works. Issues like Dahsudhu are not new to the Internent age, although it does make them more frequent. But the Internet also brings more people overall into the political process - so it's probably a wash.
Re: millions of "people?" donated over a $billon$ to Obama
Those funds were returned to who?
Shouldn't the DN Party try to get their hands on some of them? I hear they took deficit spending to a new level.
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Re: Evening Wrap-up
Rate my poo? Give me a Hot Karl everyday over that shit. Oh oh oh pun!
Recent comments
Dodgers with 3 in the 8th, 5 in the 9th, and they win that game.
Yeah... that was some very athletic stuff from Willson in the 9th. Impressive.
I think Chapman and Wood both need 2 days off -- rosters expand, bring 'em up!
Cubs now 41-15 in August in the Maddon era. That'll do. That will effing do.
31 pitches, 2 hits, 1 walk, and 3 wild pitches later...the cubs win by 1.
contreras snagged some other potential wild pitches in this chapman appearance.
22 wins in august. woo.
c'mon chapman.
Down on the farm:
"Dealin'" Cease with another good outing for Eugene. Last 4 outings: 16IP, 1ER 29K. But, 10BB. Throw strikes, kid.
Candelario is killing it at Iowa after struggling at AA: .320/.406/.941 in 241AB. At age 22. Where the heck to put him next year?
UPDATE: Candy goes 3-5 tonight. Now hitting .325. Also, Almora 4-5, which is nice to see.
Happ and Jiminez to play in the AFL. Baseball is the best.
You magnificent Bastardo!
Difference is LaStella sucks, and Chapman doesn't
/,I need
My guy Addy
he's attempting a comeback (or he's just very bored) and playing indie ball in the atlantic league...short-lived-cub brad snyder is also on his team.
very boring numbers for a guy with his experience in indie ball, though not bad numbers...probably not enough to get him a minor league deal at his age (33)
there goes heyward's gold glove win. bench him and bring up matt murton.
felt like 36 for sure....
Didn't LaHair hit 36 before the All Star Break? Then none after.
@CarrieMuskat 41s41 seconds ago Bryant is 1st #Cubs player to top 35 HRs since Aramis Ramirez hit 38 in 2006
surprised me, thought Soriano may have or Rizzo...maybe LaHair or Schierholtz too :)


text:
There were 60 bookings at the San Joaquin County Jail in the 24 hours ending at 8 a.m. Wednesday. At that time, there were 1,489 people held at the jail, which has an official capacity of 1,411. When the jail is full, some inmates may be released early.
Weapons arrest: Community Response Team officers conducted a traffic stop about 10 p.m. Tuesday near Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and South Sutter Street. The driver, 38-year-old Ramon Nunez, was arrested after officers found a gun in his possession, police said.
The California Highway Patrol responded to 15 noninjury accidents and six injury accidents in the 24 hours ending at 8 a.m. Wednesday. CHP officers recovered two stolen vehicles.
The Stockton Fire Department responded to 122 calls for service in the 24 hours ending at 8 a.m. Wednesday, including four vehicle accidents, 95 medical calls and three structure fires.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
About the Book
"McDermid is as smooth a practitioner of crime fiction as anyone out there….She's the best we've got."
—New York Times Book Review<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Scottish writer Val McDermid is one of the most respected authors at the scene of the crime, and Fever of the Bone offers a bravura display of her exceptional storytelling talents. Criminal profiler Tony Hill and his ally Detective Chief Inspector Carol Jordan are back in this terrifying psychological thriller, tracking down a brutal killer who's targeting a group of young people through a social networking site. A winner of the Gold Dagger Award, a Los Angeles Times Book Prize, and an Edgar® Award nominee—a New York Times Notable author whose writing Entertainment Weekly calls, "smooth, confident, deeply satisfying,"—Val McDermid is a crime fiction force of nature. And Fever of the Bone is among her best.
He is psychologist and criminal profiler Dr. Tony Hill's worst nightmare—a killer driven by the most perverted hungers and unmoved by youth and innocence, a killer with a long shopping list of victims who leaves no trail. The murder-mutilation of teenager Jennifer Maidment is horrific enough on its own, but Hill quickly realizes that it's just the beginning of a chilling campaign targeting an apparently unconnected group of young people—victims that the monster has been grooming through a social networking site.
It is a case that is reawakening ghosts of Tony Hill's past. And the longer it takes to uncover a motive and a maniac, the more innocent youth will die.
Educator and Librarian Resources
Product Details
- Imprint: Harper Perennial
- On Sale: 09/07/2010
- Trimsize: 5.313 in (w) x 8 in (h) x 0.821 in (d)
- Pages: 512
- List Price: 14.99 USD
- BISAC1: FICTION / General


text:
"Freesoftware Magazine" ditches PDF download version: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2667
I dont know how true this is, but I definitely do NOT want the pdf downloads to cease in favor of an online only portal.
PDFs are way better, for me at least.
Old news - move along
Oh let's not start this again.
The post you link is dated 7 Feb 2007 and refers to a very old debate from Issue 16 which has long since been resolved.
Auto-generated PDFs for articles are available. What's gone is the full colour professionally produced print-style PDF of pre-Issue 16 days.
[EDITED: Entire issue's PDFs are gone; however, articles will stay]
Where are the PDF issues?
I don't seem to be able to find them anywhere.
GOne for now
I changed Ryan's response to reflect the current situation.
We now have PFD downloads and pring preview for any logged in user. However, we recently upgraded from XML to Markdown in terms of article formats, and I haven't been able to restore the issue's PDFs. I tried and tried - it's just too hard to get HTMLDoc to generate them.
PDF Downloads
Attempting to download the PDFs (as I always had done) has been driving me nuts for months! I was beginning to think I was going crazy.
Change the newsletter announcement
I can understand there are problems creating a .PDF for download, but I too have wasted a fair bit of time and sanity trying to download the most recent issues. In my defence, this is because the mail list announcment e-mail mentions "Generated PDFs are available" and to me this implies the whole magazine. Perhaps this announcement could be changed?
If it isn't broken - don't fix it. But then again, you won't learn as much.
Good point - done!
So there are no more issues in pdf for download?
how to download fsm
i used to download lots of fsm issues once..
i just downloaded the pdf's of all issues upto 18..
After nearly 2-3 months i have forgotten how to download the pdf version of the issues..
I searched and searched but didn't find out how..?
please any help,..
You can't download issues
Tony's response above explains why you can no longer get PDFs of entire issues. Only PDFs of individual articles are now available.
HTH Ryan
The download of PDF issues of Free Software Magazine is now possible.
Please note that these are automatically generated files. They will get better as HTMLDOC gets better.
Thank you,
Tony, are we going to add
Tony, are we going to add PDF capabilities for columns piece as well?
Andrew Min


text:
Holiday Snowman
Prep Time: 20 Min
Total Time: 20 Min
Servings: 24 servings
- 1/4 cup (1/2 stick) butter or margarine
- 1 pkg. (10-1/2 oz.) miniature marshmallows (6 cups)
- 1 pkg. (13 oz.) Fruity Pebbles Cereal (about 8-1/2 cups)
- 1 chewy fruit snack roll
- 6 ring-shaped chewy fruit snacks
- 3 bite-size chocolate sandwich cookies
- 1 strawberries & crème flavor soft candy
- Grease 2 (9-inch) round cake pans lightly; set aside. Microwave butter in 4-qt. microwaveable bowl on HIGH 45 sec. or until melted. Add marshmallows; toss to coat. Microwave 1-1/2 min. or until marshmallows are completely melted, stirring after 45 sec. Add cereal; mix well.
- Remove 1 cup of the cereal mixture; shape to resemble the snowman's hat. Press remaining cereal mixture evenly into prepared cake pans. Cool completely.
- Remove cereal rounds from pans; place on large cutting board or serving platter to resemble head and body of snowman. Place hat on the snowman's head. Decorate with fruit roll to resemble the scarf and hat band, and with fruit snacks to resemble eyes and nose. Add cookies for the buttons. Gently stretch soft candy into 2-inch length and use for mouth.
Tips and Suggestions
Fruity Pebbles Wreaths: Prepare cereal mixture as directed. With greased hands, shape 1/2 cup of the cereal mixture into wreath shape. Place on wax paper-covered tray. Repeat with remaining cereal mixture. Cool. Garnish with green decorating icing and red hot cinnamon candies or bows made from chewy fruit snack rolls or string licorice, if desired. Makes 1-1/2 dozen wreaths or 18 servings, 1 wreath each.
Fruity Pebbles Snowballs: Prepare cereal mixture as directed. With greased hands, shape 1/2 cup of the cereal mixture into ball. Repeat with remaining cereal mixture. Cool. Place 1/2 cup powdered sugar in large resealable plastic bag. Add balls, 1 at a time, to bag; gently shake bag until balls are evenly coated with sugar. Place on wax paper-lined tray. Makes 1-1/2 dozen balls or 18 servings, 1 ball each.
Note: Microwave ovens vary. Cooking times are approximate.
Holiday Snowman
Nutrition Info (Per Serving)
|Total Fat
|3 g
|Saturated Fat
|1.5 g
|5 mg
|125 mg
|26 g
|15 g
|< 1 g
|Vitamin A


text:
- Binding: Hardcover & eBook
- Era: Current
- Number of Pages: 320
- Subject: History
- Date Available: November 2010
Clear The Decks Price*
Your tax-deductible gift to the Naval Institute Press underwrites worthy books that might not otherwise be published.
In this comprehensive portrait of the women of Chechnya in modern war, Paul Murphy argues that they are the principal victims of the 1994 and 1999 wars with Russia and the present conflict with Islamic jihadists. War forced Chechen women to venture far beyond their traditional roles and advance their human rights, but the current movement championing traditional Islam is taking those rights away. The book challenges conventional thinking on why women fight and are willing to kill themselves in the name of Allah. Drawing on personal interviews, insider resources, and other materials, Murphy presents powerful portrayals of women who fight in the Chechen jihad, including snipers and the mysterious "Black Widow" suicide bombers, as well as women who collect intelligence, hide arms, and perform other noncombatant roles.
Paul J. Murphy, a former senior intelligence and U.S. counterterrorism official, has worked on counterterrorism cooperation projects with the Russian Parliament. The author of four other books, he currently teaches and is the director of the Russia-Eurasia Terror Watch.
Selected for Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol 6, No 2 (2012), Terrorism Bookshelf: Top 150 Books on Terrorism and Counterterrorism
"Allah's Angels is a well-written and documented book that explains how conflict environments and actors evolve over time and how regional conflicts have transnational and cultural implications Its extensive notes, useful index, and numerous photos of the wartime environment and various Chechecn women (angels) provide great insight into the culture. Whether you agree with Murphy's views or not, the book is of enduring value."
— Military Review, May-June 2012
"Reading through Paul Murphy's newest book, Allah's Angels: Chechen Women in War, the sheer level of detail provided about the Chechen conflict and the role played by individual women instantly strikes one. This book is certainly a treasure trove of information that provides a behind-the-scenes look at Chechen society and the motivation of female Chechen terrorists….the book is a much-needed addition to the literature and an extremely useful source for analysts of the Chechen conflict and political violence in general."
— The Russian Review, January 2012
"This book can only enhance the debate on countering Militant Islamist groups in this troubled region and offers clarity of thought. The book challenges conventional thinking on why women fight and are willing to kill themselves in the name of Allah."
—Military Technology, March 2011


text:
The following post is from the blog Edudemic.com
Why It Pays To Earn A Higher Degree [INFOGRAPHIC]
It's no secret that school is hard. It takes a lot of time, effort, and sacrifices. But does it pay off? An infographic based on statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics says…it does.
As you can see from the infographic (below) by US College Search, the higher degree-holders not only have higher-paying jobs but they also have a lower unemployment rate. That means it's worth taking night school towards that next degree even if its just for increased job security. Just how much money does a higher degree earn you? Take a look at the bottom left figures. Those dollar amounts are the median weekly earnings (from 2008) and show a substantial increase when you multiply those figures 52 times (the number of weeks in a year). Want to see this infographic a bit bigger? Click the image to enlarge.
Still not convinced? Let us know if you think it's really worthwhile to spend the time and effort in getting a higher degree. Think it's too expensive? Check out the Harvard Extension School to see how you can get a Harvard Master's Degree for a reasonable price. Let us know what you think by tweeting us with @edudemic in the tweet!


text:
The U.S. Navy has had some recent trouble with bath salt usage among its sailors, so they did what any forward thinking branch of the military would do: They released a bizarre PSA about the drug. According to the video, at least one of the following will occur if you ingest bath salts: 1) you'll vomit, 2) you'll punch your girlfriend while bowling, and 3) your friends will transform into demons before your eyes. Also: you'll only be able to hear dubstep.
In case that doesn't sound bad enough, the video also includes a testimonial from Lt. George Loeffler, a Psychiatry Resident at the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, who explains exactly how terrible the synthetic drug is.
"When people are using bath salts, they're not their normal selves," he says. "They're angrier. They're erratic. They're violent and they're unpredictable…. People will start seeing things that aren't there, believing things that aren't true."
Loeffler said that the most disturbing thing about bath salts is that the effects of paranoia can last days or even weeks after the drugs have left the user's system.
But, of course, we already knew all that.


text:
OAKLAND -- In the last two seasons, the A's won the American League West title but failed to move past the first round of the playoffs, losing Game 5 of the division series to the Detroit Tigers.
What the A's need to do in building their 2014 team is figure out how to bridge that gap, and it starts now, with the free agency season upon us.
"Typically, we are not major players in free agency,'' A's general manager Billy Beane said. "That being said, there are players we will be looking at with the idea that we can be more productive with the right move.''
Oakland almost certainly will lose closer Grant Balfour. The A's historically have not been willing to pay a premium for a closer, and the club has strong candidates for that job in lefty Sean Doolittle and right-handers Ryan Cook and Dan Otero.
The club wants to keep right-hander Bartolo Colon, and the 18-game winner has said he'd like to come back at age 40. But 18 wins makes him a tempting target on the free agent market. While the A's showed loyalty in bringing him back with a $3 million contract after his performance-enhancing drug suspension in 2012, if his value rockets to $12 million or $15 million, it's not clear if Colon would be loyal enough to continue wearing green and gold.
As it stands now, left fielder Yoenis Cespedes' $10.5 million contract is the biggest single outlay on the A's 2014 payroll, although that could change if Coco Crisp gets his wish of a contract extension. The club is picking up his option for $7.5 million, and they are talking about giving Crisp, 33, an extension as he is coming off his first 20-homer, 20-steals season.
No position is crying out for improvement with the possible exception of second base, where Eric Sogard hit .266 in 130 games and Alberto Callaspo hit .270 with five homers and 22 RBI in 50 games after being acquired from the Los Angeles Angels at the trade deadline.
The A's won't go after New York Yankees free agent second baseman Robinson Cano, who reportedly is looking for the biggest contract in major league history.
There aren't many other potential free agent second basemen who are appealing, so if the A's want to upgrade at that position, they might have to trade for a veteran starter such as Brandon Phillips of the Reds, Dan Uggla of the Braves or the Brewers' Rickie Weeks, whose brother Jemile was once the second baseman of the future in Oakland and who is still in the organization.
The A's could move shortstop Jed Lowrie to second and scour free agency for a shortstop. But the players who could be the most impactful, perhaps Jhonny Peralta and ex-Oaklander Stephen Drew of the Red Sox, are too pricey.
"We haven't signed the highest-profile guys," Beane said. "But the guys we've added generally have made an impact."
Balfour (after the 2010 season), Colon (after 2011), Cespedes (after 2011) and current Red Sox outfielder Jonny Gomes (after 2011) are recent free agent signees who have paid off for the A's.
As for the pitching rotation, the A's have a full contingent coming back, even if Colon signs elsewhere. Jarrod Parker, A.J. Griffin, Dan Straily, Sonny Gray, Tommy Milone and Brett Anderson give the A's six candidates for five spots, so trading one of them, possibly the oft-injured Anderson, is a possibility. The Toronto Blue Jays have been linked to an Anderson deal in the past.
The outfield (Cespedes, Crisp, Josh Reddick, Seth Smith) is full even with the A's deciding not to pick up the option for Chris Young, who now is free to strike his own deal. Former first-round draft pick Michael Choice could be Young's replacement.
The infield has no evident openings at third base (Josh Donaldson), shortstop (Lowrie) or first base (Brandon Moss), and the A's are deep in catchers with Stephen Vogt, John Jaso and Derek Norris.
For more on the A's, see John Hickey's Insider at blogs.ibabuzz.com/athletics. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JHickey3.
Anda Chu/Staff
Ryan Cook, pictured, is one of several candidates to assume the closer role for the A's if Grant Balfour departs as expected.


text:
Back to Listing
(RFI) - Automotive Fuel Cell Cost and Durability Targets
Open Date: 04/01/2013
Close Date: 06/01/2013
Funding Organization: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Funding Number: DE-FOA-0000855
Please note, the RFI submission deadline has been extended to June 1, 2013.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing a Request for Information (RFI) seeking input from stakeholders on proposed cost targets for fuel cells designed for automotive applications. The purpose of this RFI is to solicit feedback from developers, manufacturers, end users, and other stakeholders on proposed cost and durability targets for automotive fuel cell systems. The proposed targets are $40/kW in 2020 and $30/kW for the ultimate target (2030) for automotive fuel cell system cost, and 5000hrs or 150,000 miles for durability. This RFI is not and will not lead directly to a Funding Opportunity Announcement; therefore the DOE is not accepting applications at this time.
For more information, see the full solicitation.
Last updated: 04/19/2013
Funding amounts and schedules are subject to change.


text:
Your Stuck-at-Work Guide to World Cup 2014
The World Cup is upon us—once every four years, 32 nations square off in 64 games to determine which country has the best soccer—aka football, or better yet, fútbol—team on earth. It's a tournament truly unlike any other, with elements that reflect some of the best and worst of humanity—passion, identity, sportsmanship…and even corruption.
But following this massive tournament isn't easy—especially when you're stuck at work or school. Don't worry though, there are great apps and websites to help keep up with the Cup. Here are your best options:
Get Prepared
Whether you're new to the World Cup or have been following soccer around the globe for decades, there are plenty of tech resources to help you get a feel for what different teams are bringing to the Cup.
A great place to start is (not surprisingly) our own World Cup site: The Wall Street Journal has an entire online section dedicated specifically to the World Cup, and easily digestible interactive team profiles will fill you in on each nation competing in the tournament. We've also got the full World Cup game schedule, team standings, commentary and interactive graphics on the style of play for six top teams.
When it comes to the U.S. national team, our profile on what coach Jurgen Klinsmann is doing to push American soccer forward is a must-read. (Our "World Cup of Everything Else" feature is worth a look too.)
If you wander away from the Journal, look out for Michael Davies and Roger Bennett, the hosts of the "Men In Blazers" podcast—and one of the smartest and funniest duos in soccer journalism. They've cooked up 10 videos previewing each country headed to Brazil on ESPN's Grantland website.
Three for a Win is an outstanding soccer podcast from Fox Sports soccer play-by-play man Dave Denholm and soccer expert Carlos A. Torres. At threeforawin.com, you can hear short audio previews for every team. These informative podcasts are a great commute option.
Fill Out a Bracket
As is popular with the NCAA tournament, many soccer fans fill out brackets with their World Cup predications. Yahoo's World Soccer Pick'em offers an easy way to fill out brackets with friends, and see whose guesses are the most accurate as the tournament progresses.
MLSsoccer.com's Brazil Bracket Challenge is another great option—offering the ability to choose a bracket with friends or on your own. MLSsoccer.com also has a nice, simple printable bracket if you want to go offline with your picks.
Stream the Games
If you're stuck at your desk during the World Cup, but still want to watch games, your best (legal) option is ESPN. The games will be streamed on the WatchESPN website and on its apps, which are available on iOS, Android, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, the Xbox 360 and Xbox One, Chromecast and Roku. In order to use any WatchESPN app, you'll need to log in via your cable or satellite provider. If you don't have one, the online services won't work.
Univision is streaming the first two rounds of the World Cup for free, in Spanish, on its website and its iOS and Android apps.
Get Real-Time Updates
If streaming isn't an option, there are other ways to keep up with the action. Both Fusion and the Journal are liveblogging every game.
There are also apps that can send you alerts every time a goal is scored, or notify you when a winner is declared. The question is, do you want just a soccer app, or a full-on sports app? If you just care about soccer, Forza Football (for iOS and Android) is perfect for realtime updates and alerts. You can also use it to go deeper, tracking players, teams or matches.
The ESPN FC app for iOS and Android offers all the same things as Forza Football, but it will also have exclusive game highlights. If you want to keep up with the World Cup, but also other sports—hockey, basketball, baseball or anything else, ESPN's SportsCenter app on iOS and Android is the way to go, with game alerts and also breaking news alerts for whatever teams you're interested in.
Find a Place to Watch in Real Life
If you want to skip a computer, phone or tablet screen and watch the World Cup on TV out in the real world, you may be surprised that Pinterest can help. Yes, the social network not usually associate with sports has a "Watch World Cup" map with pins of more than 3,000 locations around the world—and about half of those places are in the U.S. If you're a New Yorker, you should also check out the Journal's interactive map of "Where to Watch the World Cup in NYC."


text:
- Similar to how the Beatles and other phenomenal bands crafted their style and prowess by showcasing for the hardest to please crowds, the Gold Magnolias' exciting, funky and intoxicating soulful grooves are largely due to the dark underground bars of the South that paid them in tequila and chicken wings.
However, it wasn't long before this dynamic band, steeped in the traditions of southern blues, soul and jazz, became a coveted item when they moved to New York and found their spell-binding frontman Ryan Anselmi.
It's no surprise that the influences on various members of the band include Stevie Wonder, Al Green, Otis Redding, Stevie Ray Vaughn and Eric Clapton; their music clearly echoes legendary and reminds you that music is about being human and feeling a pulse rather than just a beat.
An incredible performance in the truest sense of the word, band member, Even Felts says, "We are a live band. Period. I mean, we recorded our album live. We play shows live. We are very performance based."
Yet underneath all the excitement of their wildly entertaining presence, there are lyrics and song structures that will touch you, soften your heart and certainly make you laugh. Don't miss the The Gold Magnolias, performing with Harmony Presents in the Boiler Room of the Hawley Silk Mill over the gorgeous view of Wallenpaupack High Falls. Get a glimpse of them online at www.silkmillharmony.com and then come see the show in their natural state, live on stage, Saturday, May 4.
Reserve a seat by going to www.silkmillharmony.com. Tickets are available in advance online for $16 and at the door for $20. Purchase tickets advance online and enjoy 20 percent off your bill at Glass Wine Bar and Bistro at Ledges Hotel after 9:30 p.m. on the day of the show.
Harmony Presents' stages performances in and around the Hawley Silk Mill with many exciting performances to come. For more information visit Harmony Presents' website at www.silkmillharmony.com, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.com or call 588-8077. Harmony Presents is grateful for their sponsor, Gold Bold Media.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
More Internal Auditors Received Raises Last Year: Report
Last year's weak economy meant that raises were hard to come by for many workers. That is, unless you were an internal auditor.
Internal auditors were far more likely to receive pay raises in 2012 than non-audit workers, according to a survey from the Institute of Internal Auditor, and the percentage of U.S. and Canadian companies increasing auditor base salaries went up for the second year in a row.
The survey, which included data from more than 300 companies in the U.S. and Canada that employ more than 1,800 internal auditors in total, found that among U.S. companies, 35% increased salaries for all employees last year, but 64% gave raises to all of their internal auditors, up from 61% in 2011 and 28% in 2010. In Canada, 58% raised pay for all employees, compared to 83% that did the same for internal audit staff, up from 71% in 2011 and 56% in 2010.
"The increased emphasis on regulatory compliance and financial controls makes internal audit's role more important now that it has ever been," said Daniel Zeppetello, audit manager at Alliance Bank, in the report.
The median increase in base pay is expected to be 3% for internal auditors in 2013. The survey found that the higher salaries went predictably to those with the most responsibility and education, but also to those who have developed areas of specialization such as IT, fraud and forensics, and environmental, health and safety audits.
The best paid internal audit specialists in 2012 were those with expertise in IT audit, with a median salary of $96,000, compared to $91,499 for fraud and forensic auditing, and $81,867 for generalists.
At the same time, not all audit departments dedicate resources that allow their staffs to develop areas of specialization. Among U.S. companies in the survey, 23% did not allocate time or money toward training. In Canada, the same was true among 13% of respondents.


text:
EAGLE COUNTY, Colorado - The weather has a lot to say about this, but this year's wildfire season is off to a start similar to the season last year.
There's already been a large fire on the Front Range, near Fort Collins. And the snowpack in our area is just about as low as it was last year - although the storms have been better-timed for skiers and snowboarders.
The early signs have local fire officials preparing for what could be a long, smoky summer.
Around the valley, local fire departments in May will roll out a second season of last year's successful "Ready, Set, Go!" fire preparedness classes. Those classes - which help residents understand what they can do if a wildfire forces them to evacuate their homes - last year drew hundreds of people to meetings spread out between Vail and Gypsum.
Local fire chiefs are also polishing up tactics developed last year, particularly one that put as much manpower and equipment into a fire as early as possible.
"When we have a confirmed report of a wildfire... we'll hit it hard and fast," Vail Fire Chief Mark Miller said. "It was very successful last year.
Miller said a combination of putting a lot of manpower into a fire scene as quickly as possible helped contain a fire near Eagle last year. County wildfire mitigation manager Eric Lovgren said that fire "had the potential" to get much larger and more destructive before it was contained. A small fire in Vail was also held down by putting people and equipment into the area as soon as possible.
Another part of that fast-attack strategy includes air support. Much of that support last year came from Colorado National Guard helicopters and an accurate map of available streams and ponds those choppers could use to fill water buckets.
But how much federal help will be available this summer remains a question. In the wake of federal budget cutbacks earlier this year U.S. Forest Service officials released statements indicating that this fire season might see a reduction in federal resources available to fight wildland fires.
Lovgren said local fire officials are already preparing for fewer federal firefighters.
"We've been talking with (homeowners associations), and people are getting ready," Lovgren said.
But federal resources also include air tankers.
With the federal air tanker fleet already much smaller than it was a decade ago, a pair of state lawmakers - Grand Junction Republican Steve King and Wheat Ridge Democrat Cheri Jahn - have co-sponsored a bill to establish the state's own tanker fleet.
"Having that available, and making sure they're in the state when they're needed, is an asset that we need," Eagle River Fire Protection District Chief Karl Bauer said. "But whether it's affordable, whether it can be maintained and sustained is the question."
Lovgren said California has had its own fleet for a number of years. But, he said, a state-run tanker fleet probably wouldn't require many, if any, big, multi-engined tankers - the biggest available these days is a jumbo jet that can pour thousands of gallons of retardant on a fire in a single drop.
Lovgren said local wildland fires have been helped by either single-engine, fixed-wing planes or helicopters, which can more easily get to hard-to-reach hillsides.
While local officials are already planning, they're also hoping and praying this spring won't be as dry as spring and early summer last year, when Vail went several weeks in May and June before some timely July rains eased the fire danger.
"We've talked for a while that it's not if, but when," a major wildfire strikes the county, Miller said. "Our best defense is being prepared."
Business Editor Scott N. Miller can be reached at 970-748-2930 or firstname.lastname@example.com.


text:
Where - Big Creek State Park Disc Golf Course
When - Saturday, November 9th
Cost: $25
Included - entry fee, lunch, 2 glow lights (Steve Adkisson will be on site with more lights for sale (3/$5) if you need more)
Sign up - 10-11:30 - long tees
First Round - Noon...
Lunch/Adult beverages - 3-5:30ish
Second (glow) round - 6ish - short tees
We'll have some other activities going on during lunch - if you have a bags setup - bring it.
If you can bring a side dish to share, please do.
This will be a flighted tournament.


text:
� Something I saw on cable TV this afternoon reminded me of a point I've made previously on this blog — the ridiculousness of most chants at protest demonstrations. The scene today was outside the arena in Philadelphia where the Democratic National Convention is unfolding this week. Die-hard supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders were chanting […]
Television psychic and infomercial star
Moments like these have been the siren song of my singlehood. An infatuation that never fades, a temptation that intensifies the more I give in.
Most experts agree that storing the beans in the freezer is a no-no. But, It turns out that freezing coffee beans before grinding them helps the beans break down more evenly, which is important because the size of the grind affects the rate at which...
The leak of emails from the Democratic National Committee has already rocked the party's convention this week, but it might not be over quite yet.
According to my old self and flawed standards, I would be failing miserably. Thank goodness I finally learned to start measuring my progress by things that matter — strength, ability, endurance, health and happiness.
Dave Granlund cartoon on Russians hacking DNC emails.
When the blooming does finally happen, the flower will reach up to 8 feet in height as it displays its unique bright red interior. It will also, of course, start producing its distinct stench.
Sustained North Korea threats, and nuclear weapon and missile tests, have led the Obama administration and Prime Minister Park Geun-hye�s government of South Korea to agree to deploy the Lockheed Martin THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Air Defense)...
Shawnee Directory
Business Name
Location, ST | website.com


text:
I prefer my computer's music library manager to the PS3's interface, but my laptop's speakers are...well, they're laptop speakers . My TV, OTOH is connected to better speakers. I know I can connect them with an audio cable, but for a laptop, it would be much more convenient (even if, perhaps, computational/energy overkill ) to pipe my computer's audio output buffer to the PS3 through the wireless network.
So it would be great if PMS exposed a special "file" to the PS3 which would just simply stream over the computer's audio output. I know it's possible to capture the computer's audio output because audio editing programs like Audacity are able to do it.


text:
Rodney Leir, 77, of McHenry, N.D., died Thursday, November 8, 2012 at his home. His funeral service will be held on Tuesday, November 13, at 2 p.m. at Our Savior's Lutheran Church, McHenry. Visitation will be held on Sunday, November 11, from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m., Monday from 9 a.m. until 8 p.m. and Tuesday, from 9 a.m. until 12 at Evans Funeral Home, Carrington, N.D. Burial will be in Bethlehem Cemetery, McHenry. Evans Funeral Home, Carrington, is in charge of arrangements
Location, ST | website.com


text:
Itasca State Park camping trips started last week for Highland School sixth graders. Each of the four classes spends one night sleeping in tents and two days touring the park.
This is the 39th year students have had this opportunity. One of the highlights of every field trip is crossing the Headwaters of the Mississippi River. There was still ice on Lake Itasca for some of the earliest campers, making the trek across this year a very cold one.
Location, ST | website.com


text:
"Great item excellent quality " (E20462)
"My daughter had this jersey before and loved them, which is why I ordered them for her team again." (E22560)
"Great quality. Built a 6.5 x 12 goal for my son out of 2" PVC. works great. Should get many years out of it." (E1543)
Epic Sports
NFL Packers (61-79) Replica Full Size Helmet (TB) [E52753]


text:
Share Photo
Bo Preising, Suitable Technologies' vice president of engineering, at left, talks with fellow engineers, Josh Faust, center on screen, and Josh Tyler, on screen at right, both using a Beam remote presence system in Palo Alto, Calif., Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012. More employees are working from home, but there's still no substitute for actually being at the office. Enter the Beam. It's a roving computer screen _ with video cameras, microphones and speakers _ that stands five feet and rides on motorized wheels. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)


text:
Ugh. I dunno, this happens with some anime where things aren't synced properly, video is jerky.
I am trying to watch To-love-ru by Exiled Destiny. This is not the only anime I've had this issue with, but most can be fixed by playing with the settings. (Except Natsume, I never did manage to get Natsume to work properly.)
What I usually try is A/V Alternative Sync, 23 / 25FPS Mis-matrch option, and parse frame rate from FFmpeg, usually a combination of these options helps.
Frustratingly enough, they did help, it - for a few minutes. I've managed to get it rather close now, but there is still an issue with audio being to late, and subtitles not matching up properly. I compared it side by side to the one played on my PC and yeah, it's wrong, it ticks me off.
I can't figure out what options to use...tried everything I can think of, and it seems the best way I got it working so far is disabling both A/V Alternative Sync & 23 / 25 FPS mis-match - but I still have that 1 second mismatch that bugs the hell outta me. Anyone got any ideas, suggestions, or should I just give up and watch it on my PC?(Not that my PC screen is a slouch either, 27'' IPS)
*Update on the issue. It seems if I exit out of the show, i.e, press back, then OK again, it resets about 1s from where I was and stuff syncs up for 2-3 minutes, then slowly starts to de-sync again.


text:
- Vitamin Guide
- Health Conditions
- Health Centers
- Diet & Weight Loss
- Herbal Remedies
- Current News
- Food Guide
- Recipes
Autistic spectrum disorders refer to a group of developmental disorders that are usually diagnosed during early childhood and that range in severity from a mild form called Asperger's syndrome to a severe form called autistic disorder.People with autism share these main characteristics:
Recent data estimate that 1 in 88 American children and 1 in 125 British children have some form of autism, with about five times as many boys affected as girls.
The causes of autism aren't fully understood, but genetic, environmental, infectious, and developmental factors have all been suggested as contributors.
There is some evidence to suggest that people with autism require extra antioxidants. They may have alterations in the signaling pathways in the brain, as well as imbalances of some substances found in the blood and nervous system.
Medications like risperidone (Risperdal) and aripiprazole (Abilify) may be used to treat symptoms of irritability (such as aggression, self-injury, and sudden mood changes) associated with autism. These drugs come with some serious side effects, though, including breast enlargement in boys, weight gain, dizziness, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.
NAC is an amino acid that works as an antioxidant in the body. It may also favorably alter brain chemistry, making it a good candidate for use in autism. Researchers from Stanford University and the Center for Pediatric Behavioral Health at the Cleveland Clinic carried out a preliminary trial to determine the effects of NAC in 25 children (average age seven years) with autistic disorder.
The children were given either 900 mg one time per day for four weeks, increasing to 900 mg two times per day for four weeks, and finally to 900 mg three times per day for another four weeks, or placebo. A series of tests were carried out at four-week intervals to see how the children responded.
At the end of the 12 weeks, irritability in children who had been given NAC significantly improved. "Managing irritability, which can be manifested by aggression, tantrums, self-injurious behaviors, and anger, with an effective and safer agent can improve overall functioning in individuals with autism and alleviate burdens on the individual and family," the researchers commented.
Repetitive behaviors, such as lining up toys in the same pattern over and over, also improved with NAC treatment. The results of the study need to be repeated in larger trials before definitive recommendations about using NAC to treat autism can be made.
Some parents of autistic children say that they always knew that something was "wrong," while others say that their child was developing normally until there was a sudden change.
Keep a chart handy of the developmental milestones-by-age that your child should be reaching. If you notice a delay in any area, such as the ability to make eye contact, babble, talk, or respond to your smiles, or if at any time he or she loses the ability to perform any previously attained skills, contact your pediatrician.
(Biol Psychiatry 2012;71:956–61)
Copyright © 2016 Healthnotes, Inc. All rights reserved. www.healthnotes.com