text:
Belgium EuroCup 2016
Win your Red Devil party package!Read more
Four key proteins
for signaling researchRead more
Even more from less
The new DNA Library Prep Kit for NGSMore info
HDx™ Reference Standards
Independent external controls to routinely monitor the performanceRead more
Key Targets in Cancer Immunology
VISTA, PD-1, TIM-3, PD-L2, IDO and PD-L1Explore
The Counter Culture
Introducing a new era in cellular modelingMore info about Callisto
NGS profiling of cancer mutations
In this application note, we present data showing the performance of the RainDrop Digital PCR system on FFPE DNA and low input cell free DNA (cfDNA) using the ThunderBolts Cancer Panel. Read more »
TIM-3 (D5D5R) mAb
TIM-3 (D5D5R) XP® Rabbit mAb detects this immune checkpoint receptor that is expressed by exhausted T cells in the settings of chronic infection and cancer. Read more »
Free delivery on online orders
Benefit from free delivery on all online orders. Read more »
Dear visitor, please select your country from the list below.


text:
More From
Forth of July
Paperback: List Price: $31.82 $25.46 | You Save: 20%
Prints in 3-5 business days
FORTH OF JULY is a long poem in three books (Stubborn Grew, The Grassblade Light, July) in which a homesick Henry follows a mysterious Bluejay into the interior.
Paperback: List Price: $18.16 $15.44 | You Save: 15%
Prints in 3-5 business days
JULY is the third and final volume of the long poem, FORTH OF JULY.
Chapel Hill
Paperback: List Price: $16.56 $13.25 | You Save: 20%
Prints in 3-5 business days
CHAPEL HILL is a trilogy, featuring novella, short story, and a sequence of poems (Midwest Elegies).
Way Stations
Paperback: List Price: $15.26 $12.21 | You Save: 20%
Prints in 3-5 business days
WAY STATIONS : selected poems, 1985-1997.
Island Road Paperback:
$13.32 $10.66
Rest Note Paperback:
$17.78 $14.22
Stubborn Grew Paperback:
$15.90 $12.72
Dove Street Paperback:
$13.18 $10.54
In RI Paperback:
$17.92 $14.34
Top 10 This Weeksee more >
Bootstrap Student...
Paperback: $20.00
North Carolina Auto...
Paperback: $25.99
Resilience - The...
Paperback: $19.00
UNLV Gaming Research...
Paperback: $35.00
NACTA Journal Volume 60,...
Paperback: $25.00
Crossing the Finish...
Paperback: $9.95
Chop Wood Carry Water:...
Paperback: $15.00
Stephanie's Diary
Paperback: $9.99
The Rebellious...
Paperback: $10.00
Dolce Italia: Authentic...
Paperback: $38.99
Age Verification
The page you are attempting to access contains content that is not intended for underage readers.
Please verify your birth date to continue.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
A sneak peek into Deakin university's 'LIVE the future'
By Team Edex
Published: 03rd December 2012 12:00 AM
Last Updated: 03rd December 2012 03:06 PM
What is Deakin Wordly?
This year, Deakin launched its new strategic plan — LIVE the future, developed after extensive consultation with staff and analysis of the sector. The plan builds on Deakin's tradition and reputation as a university with a student-focused culture and a longstanding record for using cutting-edge technology. Through its new plan, Deakin aspires to be Australia's premier university in driving the digital frontier to enable globally-connected education for the jobs of the future, and research that makes a difference to the communities we serve.
Do you offer scholarships for Indian students?
Deakin currently offers scholarships ranging from AUD2,500 to 7,000 (approx `1.5-4 lakh) that have been designed exclusively for the benefit of meritorious Indian students. We also offer limited competitive scholarships to all international students that range from AUD3-5,000 (`1.7-3 lakh) per annum. Scholarships are awarded on the basis of academic merit.
Your views on the research potential of Indian universities.
We work with some of the best Indian universities, both public and private. Based on our experience with them, we are well aware that some of the best contemporary and futuristic research is being undertaken by Indian Universities across all spheres right from arts to engineering. We are very lucky and proud of being part of some these research projects as collaborators/partners.
Must Read
Disclaimer: We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the NIE editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.


text:
© 2002-2016
Encyclopaedia Metallum
Best viewed
without Internet Explorer,
in 1280 x 960 resolution
or higher.
As Conan Hultgren aka Condo:
Guitars, Vocals
|Church of Misery / Deer Creek (Split)
|Guitars, Vocals
|Raw Radar War / Deer Creek (Split)
|Guitars, Vocals
|Added by: djurassic
|Modified by: Stormhate
|Added on: 2011-04-25 13:12:03
|Last modified on: 2013-02-17 14:23:30
|Duplicate? Please file a report for merging.


text:
... night and the side effects of quetiapine were ten times worse and when i took it of the side effects passed. Was this just a coinsidence nurses dont seem to know, its not in their blue book
Does anyone know if nicotine patches make you feel ill if on quetiapine xl. I put a patch on last?
- Posted:
- 30 Sep 2011 by kerry1984
- Topics:
- paranoid disorder, smoking cessation, nicotine, quetiapine, side effect
Answers (2)
30 Sep 2011
When I quit smoking, I assumed I needed the highest dose because I was up to 2 packs a day. When I used the 14mg patch I got very dizzy nauseated, & sick feeling. As soon as I took it off I was ok too. I cut mine in half (I'll get some flack here) & used 1/2 of one & it didn't do that to me.I have not smoked in 7 years, & even got off the patches after a few days instead of weeks & weeks. Mind over matter. Keep a toothpick you can put in your mouth & fumble with It really helps. Good luck with your great endeavor. I do not know what your med is, but if your nurse didn't think they should react then it was probably just the patch itself.
Further Information
Search for questions
Still looking for answers? Try searching for what you seek or ask your own question.
Similar Questions
Is it safe to use nicotine patches while on suboxone?
1 answer • 14 Dec 2009
Addicted to nicotine gum, are there any health risks?
I stopped smoking on july 2 but never was able to stop taking the gum. I am obviously addicted to the gum. If I didn't take the gum I feel sure ...
1 answer • 15 May 2012
I'm taking Wellbutrin for smoking cessation and I 'msupposed to take it a week?
and then wear a nicotine patch after thatI I smoke about 8 cigarettes a day.Does this sound right ?
1 answer • 3 Oct 2012
Nicotine - Feeling of being high after I took patch off?
I am on a 24 hour patch for 12 days now and during the second week I had a headache which lasted for 3 days. I took the patch off before bed to see ...
1 answer • 18 Jan 2013
Champix - day 6 still smoking was on nicotine patches before which cut down my smoking?
Now im back smoking more again, i really want to give up . does anyone know is it ok to ware nicotine patches while taking champix?. I think its my ...
0 answers • 17 Oct 2015


text:
MICHAEL Michael Kors
58mm Metal Aviator Sunglasses
Product not available
Have questions?
Chat with us or call 1.888.282.6060.
HideDetails & Care
Double-bridge metal aviators with glass lenses and a classic silhouette are fashioned with adjustable nose pads for comfort.
- 58mm lens width; 14mm bridge width; 135mm temple length.
- 100% UV protection.
- Metal.
- By MICHAEL Michael Kors; imported.
58mm Metal Aviator Sunglasses
Write a Review0 Reviews
Enter a valid first name.
Enter a valid last name.
Enter a valid email address in the format: email@example.com.
Close modal


text:
Jaguars face stiff challenge
Cedar Shoals junior Ryan Cooper drives to the basket in the Jaguars' 77-61 win over East Paulding in the first round of the state tournament.
Jeff Blake/Staff
Related Story
To The Gallery
Order a print of this picture
Athens, GA ? Athens Banner-Herald © 2016. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy / About Our Ads | Content Removal Policy


text:
landing spot. will be interesting to see how he does.
Mailbag: Argument For Borges, Montgomery Departure Effect, Emo Business, Don't Play Skyrim
Brian Sipe and Al Borges did not see eye to eye
Quarterback coach?
Quarterback coach?
-BML, Brooklyn
Nope. When Borges arrived someone asked him about having a QB coach, and he said that he wasn't a fan of the setup they had at SDSU, where Brian Sipe was hired as a dedicated QB coach. That relationship was strained, it seems, and Borges now handles all that himself.
My google-fu has failed me in an effort to find this quote, but a couple years back there was a direct statement from Borges that he prefers to work with the QBs himself, alone.
UPDATE: a commenter comes through.
"I'm sure there were times I was driving Brian nuts, because I was being driven nuts. Coaching quarterbacks is more my M.O."
What is the argument for Borges?
What is the argument for Borges?
Watching bowl games and I'm jealous of Iowa and their dinosaur coaching staff occasionally running up tempo offense.
Al Borges has either had the game pass him by or hasn't trusted his QBs at michigan one bit. They don't/can't run tempo, don't/can't get out of the huddle in time to gather any info on the defensive alignment pre-snap and don't/can't commit to any spread concepts that put playmakers in space and pressure defenders to make one on one plays in space.
Michigan's offense doesn't take advantage of ANY of the benefits of modern college offenses.
Miami, FL
The argument in his favor is that he does tend to have high YPA offenses when he has decent quarterbacks, and in YPA is generally regarded as the stat most predictive of victory. If you've heard the roundtable on WTKA this year you've heard Craig bring this up weekly, at which point I shoot him down because Michigan's running game is just so so bad this year. Then he brings it up the next week because his pet YPA stat was actually pretty accurate, and we repeat the cycle.
Anyway. In year two at SDSU, Ryan Lindley had a 9.1 YPA, which is near-great. In three years at Michigan:
- Denard 2011: 8.4
- Denard 2012: 7.9
- Devin 2012: 9.7(!)
- Devin 2013: 8.6
Things at Auburn were great, then increasingly grimmer. Jason Campbell cracked the 10 YPA mark in year one, then Brandon Cox went from 7.6 to 8.1 to 6.6, whereupon Borges got fired in favor of that Franklin spread guy who got fired midseason the next year, leading to Borges's current pathological worldview.
I'm not even sure how much of the Cox degradation I blame on Borges. I saw Cox live and in person in his senior year, and by that time his arm strength had degraded to Russell Bellomy-against-Nebraska levels. Meanwhile Tommy Tuberville's staff was a collection of Just In Charge Of Something For No Reasons that undermined the next guy and got fired as a unit as a result—they were Rodriguez's defensive assistants and Borges was Scott Shafer.
This year's actually-quite-good YPA stat (23rd nationally) is impressive in context. I think you can make a case that with a functional running game, Borges can pilot an effective offense. The program is pretty dinosaur all around, but at least Borges has shown that he is looking for the knockout punch.
Dear Brian,
I've read and heard a lot about our miserable offensive line and how Coach Borges's hands are somewhat tied with such an incapable unit. But it seems to me that the larger problem is the predictability of his play calling. I don't study tape or rewatch games the way our opponents must, but even I feel like I know exactly when he's going to run the ball and when he isn't. The Nebraska players said as much after they completely shut us down. The only game that I can remember saying to myself "I didn't expect that" with regard to our ground game was against OSU, and in that match-up our O line suddenly looked average/competent against a good Buckeye unit. I feel like Borges is a guy that really believes that as long as everyone "executes", it doesn't matter if the opposing defense has an idea of what's coming. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.
Thanks again for your hard work.
When one half of your offense is totally incapable of picking up yard one in most games you do tend to get predictable. Defenses figure out the thing that you are trying to do and shut it down because they aren't worried about the other thing. The Kansas State game was a great example of that: once the Wildcats figured out what Michigan was doing and adapted to stop it there wasn't much else Michigan could execute so they had to keep doing the one thing they could do.
This pattern is familiar from 2008, when Rodriguez would insert various tweaks and folds into his rushing offense that would work great for about a half and then die in a heap. Remember the 2008 Penn State game that was 17-14 at halftime and then ended something like 80-17 Penn State? Same thing: unleash something unexpected that really works (in that case it was MINOR RAGE), then have bupkis when opponent adjusts.
Predictability is a hallmark of crappy offenses, but it's more a symptom than a disease.
The Jerry Montgomery effect?
Hi Brian,
I see a lot of Michigan fans saying they will give the defensive staff a pass for this season's defensive performance because this is the same staff responsible for vast improvements seen in the first year under Brady Hoke. But, this isn't the same staff. We lost Jerry Montgomery to Oklahoma last offseason. Our d-line was definitely disappointing this year. Could you please comment on whether Montgomery leaving was a bigger blow than anticipated? Also, could you please comment on Roy Manning's performance as the linebacker coach?
Thanks and Go Blue!
How disappointing was it, though?
Our impressions are always colored by the most recent thing to happen and those two things were eviscerations by OSU and Kansas State, but the overall picture is less than awful. Michigan finished 35th in raw YPC without an imposing pass rush and without a whole lot of blitzing or load-the-box safety help. Their YPC allowed (3.81) was identical to last year's number, when Montgomery was around.
On an individual level, by the time the Ohio State game rolled around Ondre Pipkins had torn his ACL and Michigan's first choice nose tackle was 285 pound Jibreel Black, which went about as well as you might expect against what was by far the nation's top rushing offense. That is a huge and obvious personnel issue caused by injury—I continue to assume that something was just not right with Quinton Washington because otherwise his deployment makes no goddamn sense at all—and youth.
On an individual level, Michigan got strong upward ticks from everyone on the line:
- Frank Clark went from hype bust of the offseason to a solid, Tim Jamison-as-senior effort.
- Willie Henry went from obscure rotation guy to solid starter and potential future star.
- Black was considerably better than he was as a junior, though completely overmatched because of his size at certain points.
- Brennen Beyer… actually went backwards a bit, okay. But again this was Michigan's first choice SDE against OSU, a 250-pound dude.
The lack of imposing pass rush is an issue that needs to be addressed, yes. I don't think this season was necessarily that disappointing when you look at the roster at the three interior DL spots (SDE counts as one in my book). There is a gap akin to the interior OL on the roster.
Remove injured Pipkins and your non-freshman options at three interior DL spots that really need about six guys to rotate through are Black (285 pounds), Washington (inexplicable lack of PT), Ash (never played meaningful snaps in his life before OSU), and Heitzman (dumped from rotation in favor of 250-pound SAM). All things considered they were doing really well to hold up like they did before the season-ending collapse.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma was 53rd in rushing D, giving up a third of a yard per attempt more than M. I don't think Montgomery was a huge blow.
As for Manning, he's got the outside linebackers, which means SAM and only SAM. Michigan got quality play from first Beyer and then Cam Gordon; Jake Ryan was not as impactful this year but with the injury that's understandable. Tentative thumbs up in year one.
It wasn't too long ago that you were ready to cut someone about something something
Is there a point for you at which fanhood of Michigan football is so disappointing because of things besides kids trying their best (e.g., Borges/Hoke insanity, almost everything Dave Brandon) that stop...like, really, at least sort of? As we as a fanbase get to consider your experience of being a fan and weigh it against our own, you shared some, I don't know, despondency or something at times this season, usually in appropriate situations. And in a time in my life when I am thinking of getting ready for my marriage, and getting something resembling a career going, and God help me I'll be a father in a few years...this football stuff just seems like a waste of time when everything besides the kids gets me as worked up as [REDACTED TOPIC OF CHOICE] does.
Honestly, larger than the blog, which I could see continuing in a hundred ways, is there a "this far and no further" point in your tolerance of extraneous bullshit for the sake of the joy or whatever it is that's so incredible when the kids on the field do amazing things?
I mean, after the 2009 Illinois game, I locked myself in a dorm and turned off my phone and didn't talk to anyone until late Sunday. As crazy and immature as that was, nothing about the disappointment of a loss has ever made me feel like I should stop following the team. But now I read about BWW Bowls and Jerryworld II and I'm like...whatever, man.
This is a natural consequence of aging and putting things in your life other than football that poop all over themselves when you would rather they not do that. Eventually, this will be you, wishing you weren't pooping all over yourself while watching Michigan poop all over itself in a hologram.
Anyway. It is an annual rite for person X on message board Y to declare that they just don't have the steam in them any more. I get it. To be blunt, I've been struggling with motivation issues since about midseason and understand anyone who flips the TV off and goes bowling*.
But, again, it is a human tendency to project most recent thing as thing that happens forever. It is not so. It was just last April that I was in the Georgia Dome, panicking about a Ke$ha song (probably, anyway; getting to the point where I can't necessarily discern which pop ingénues is which) because it was the thing going on before the national championship game. If they had played The Final Countdown I literally would have grabbed my buddy and gone AHHHH AHHHH AHHHH until he slapped me.
This season has been particularly enervating because of not only the suckiness of the team but its total unwatchability. As I mentioned in the post-bowl column, the 3-9 outfit was a worse team but they came by their awfulness honestly. Not that these folk didn't, but there is a special pain in rushing for negative yards consecutive weeks. It is transmitted direct to your eyeballs.
When this is not the case, you will discover the terror of your attachment again. Probably.
In your specific case, I've tied my career to this and don't have the option, so I don't know man. I tend to think I might get fed up, but I'm still getting hockey tickets and no one really cares if I go to hockey. Maybe I would just complain about feeling like a sucker and continue acting like a sucker.
*[I finally broke down and played Skyrim. Do not do this. Skyrim is the kind of awful that only reveals itself after you've set 60 hours of your life on fire listening to boring conversations and dully hacking things in the face. Their open world is beautiful and soulless, shiny on the outside but hollow in the center. Bethesda's mechanics are hopelessly broken in every single game they make, and while being able to jump across a continent in Morrowind was charmingly broken, Skyrim's mechanics invite you to a dull, iron-dagger-laden trudge through one moronically designed UI after another.
I just played the computer version of Michigan's 2013 football season. I DID IT TO MYSELF. AGAIN.]
Obviously changes need to be made, and probably already have for all I know. I posed this idea to some friends this morning and got intrigued responses but it was ultimately dismissed as unrealistic: Michigan should hire Pat Narduzzi as head coach right now.
He's obviously ready for a move, would clearly help Michigan's defense tremendously (and bring in a new OC who could only be an upgrade), and this would really hurt one of our division rivals who is on the verge of becoming a regular contender. I would say this move would be on par with hiring Bo (who, at the time, was an Ohio State guy, even though he was at Miami). Getting Narduzzi now is no different, except skipping the middle step of him coaching elsewhere first. Has anyone suggested this idea yet, and what do you think from the perspective of is it possible as well as is it a good move?
Hoops Mailbag: McGary Injury Impact, Caris At Point, Donnal Redshirt
U-M can get by with three options at center (all photos by Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog)
As we welcome in the new year, we've moved on from fretting about the 2013 football team to ... fretting about the 2013-14 basketball team. There's good reason for this, of course, with Mitch McGary's season almost certainly over due to his upcoming back surgery. Your hoops mailbag questions reflect this, as all but one are related to the impact of McGary's absence in one way or another. Without further ado, here's a very McGary-centric mailbag.
@AceAnbender Where to Mitch's minutes go percentage-wise between Irvin, Morgan, and Horford?
— Bry Mac (@Bry_Mac) December 31, 2013
John Beilein announced this week that—at least for now—he's sticking with Jordan Morgan as the starting center and Jon Horford coming off the bench. I don't think McGary's absence will affect the minutes of Zak Irvin very much, if at all; he might see an increase in minutes, but that will be due to his in-season progression as opposed to any need for him to play the four, as Max Bielfeldt and Glenn Robinson III can pick up much of the slack there.
As for how the minutes will be distributed, we already have an idea thanks to the four games McGary has missed so far this season. In the first two games of the year, Horford started and played 22-24 minutes while Morgan added 12-15, with Bielfeldt getting 4-6 minutes of mostly garbage time. The split between Horford and Morgan has reversed in the last two games; Morgan played 22 and 24 minutes against Stanford and Holy Cross, respectively. While Horford only played six minutes against the Cardinal, that's because he picked up five fouls in that span, opening up a few more minutes for Bielfeldt to see the floor.
For the time being, I expect Beilein to go with a 25/15 split between Morgan and Horford, with Bielfeldt picking up a few minutes here and there at both the four and the five. The wild card here is foul trouble: Horford currently averages 4.7 fouls per 40 minutes, while Morgan is at a whopping 6.6 (the change in charge calls has really hurt him defensively). Bielfeldt got 12 minutes against Stanford. Notably, freshman big Mark Donnal didn't see any time despite all three bigs being in foul trouble in that game, which brings me to the next question...
@AceAnbender also, any chance of burning Donnal's redshirt due to need for bigs?
— Morris Fabbri (@MoMoneyMoFabbri) December 31, 2013
I don't think this is going to happen unless another big man misses extended time. Donnal is a lean stretch four at 6'9", 230 pounds, and unlike Caris LeVert last year there isn't a mountain of practice hype to suggest he'll force his way onto the court despite the need to add bulk. Between Morgan, Horford, Bielfeldt, GRIII, and Irvin, the Wolverines have plenty of options when it comes to filling minutes at the four and the five; I don't see the benefit of burning Donnal's redshirt just so he can fill in for a few minutes from time to time.
@AceAnbender i understand how important mcgary was last year but beileins offense doesnt need a big guy so why is it a big deal? #mgomailbag
— Kyle Rosenbaum (@Gkm13) December 31, 2013
This entirely ignores the best aspect of McGary's game: his ability to induce chaos. Despite playing through injury this year, he's currently ranked 29th nationally in steal rate, which not only foils opponent possessions but usually gets Michigan into the fast break, where they're much more effective than in their halfcourt offense. Neither Horford nor Morgan provides that threat, and while Horford has proven to be as good—if not better—at blocking shots than McGary, Morgan is a relative non-factor in that regard.
He's also a superlative offensive rebounder, ranking 83rd in that regard, though Horford and Morgan actually have slightly higher rebound rates on that end—we'll see if that holds with increased minutes. On the other end, while Horford is just about equal with McGary when it comes to defensive rebounding, there's a big dropoff to Morgan, who's posted just a 15.9 DReb% in comparison to 25.4% for McGary and 24.6% for Horford.
Also, McGary has easily the best chemistry with Michigan's perimeter players on the pick and roll, especially Nik Stauskas and Spike Albrecht. Horford is inconsistent when it comes to setting a good screen, while Morgan—as we've seen for four years—has trouble catching entry passes cleanly and finishing strong at the rim. McGary's passing acumen—especially when Michigan faces zone defenses—will also be missed; his assist rate is around double those of the other two bigs. Beilein's offense may not run through the post; that doesn't mean it won't suffer without McGary.
@AceAnbender odds Mitch comes back next year? Doing so could boost his draft stock, but he might feel urgency to get paid.
— Dan Roehrig (@DanRareEgg) December 31, 2013
This is going to be a very tough call for McGary; he turns 22 in June, old for a rising junior, and if he was guaranteed a first-round spot I don't think there's any question he'd turn pro. That's in seroius doubt at this point, however. Even before the injury, ESPN's Chad Ford had dropped McGary down to the #24 spot on his big board ($). In the immediate aftermath of the injury, ESPN's Jeff Goodman got this quote from an NBA general manager:
"He should have left," one NBA general manager told ESPN.com. "Now he's a borderline first-rounder. He would have been a lock last season."
The latest NBADraftNet mock has McGary going as the seventh pick of the second round. Barring a pretty miraculous recovery, McGary isn't going to have a chance to raise his stock before it's time to declare for the draft, and I believe he'll come back if he's projected as a second-round pick—unlike first-rounders, those players don't get guaranteed contracts, and a strong junior season from McGary could easily vault him back into the first round.
Alright, let's do one non-McGary question since this is getting rather depressing.
@AceAnbender Will Caris get any real burn at PG? Seems like it could at least be a 15 min/gm change of pace lineup. #MGoMailbag
— Gustavo Adventure (@colintj) December 31, 2013
It's certainly a viable lineup, especially on the defensive end, as LeVert is currently the best player on the team at defending opposing point guards, in my opinion (with a freshman and a 5'10" guy as his competition, I don't think I'm going out on a limb here). Beilein has talked about going to this lineup more often as a situational defensive lineup at the end of games and I'm in full support of this.
15 minutes a game of this, however, might be a bit much. While LeVert is great at taking care of the ball, his assist rate (14.8%) is well below Derrick Walton's (19.5%), way below Spike Albrecht's (27.7%), and even trailing Nik Stauskas (18.0%). When LeVert is running the offense, it often devolves into him dribbling the air out of the ball in isolation situations; while he's getting pretty good at getting buckets out of those plays, that's not a very sustainable way to run an offense.
That said, Beilein's offense doesn't really require a traditional point guard, and between Stauskas and LeVert there are two solid creators off the dribble when Michigan goes big. If they can get the offense to run more smoothly when LeVert initiates the play, this lineup could very well turn into Michigan's best—that's a big if, though, and deemphasizing the point guards could hamper Walton's development.
Mailbag: Worst Year Ever? Seriously, Is It?
THIS POST IS NOT FUN, SO HERE IS A SMALL CHILD ENJOYING THE BUBBLE HOCKEY TO LIFT YOUR SPIRITS [Bill Rapai]
Is this the most heartbreaking year in the history of Michigan sports?
Along with other painful experiences, we have lost by one play, one shot or one call the following four things of real consequence:
The Big Ten regular season hoops championship
The hoops national championship
Defeating undefeated Ohio State
Defeating #1 Arizona
And hell, let's just throw in the Tigers losing on a grand slam in the 9th inning to let the ALCS slip away.
I'm not sure I can watch this bowl game. I fully expect it to go to five overtimes, whereupon Gibbons shanks a kick, decapitates Hoke and Borges is made head coach.
Oh man. It is bad when I see this list and immediately think not "wow, that's pretty grim" but "don't forget losing the Outback Bowl on the last play of the game." Oh and also "don't forget losing to Notre Dame in the CCHA championship game to break a 22-year tournament streak in hockey." Oh and "Wisconsin." Jesus. If I was a Lions fan…
But I'm not, so let's self high-five on that one. /self high five
My one quibble with your list is that Michigan was probably two or three plays away from beating Louisville. But with your things and my things we can create an Arbitrary Heartbreak Point Amalgam (AHPA) and compare it to previous years. I'm including hockey because I like hockey and you can eat your own face if you don't.
Outback Bowl outcome. 1 point. It's never too much of a heartbreak to lose the Outback Bowl. The way it went down was very frustrating, as Floyd's suspension came back to bite Michigan at the worst time. Did want Denard and Kovacs to go out with wins.
THAT GODDAMNED WISCONSIN GAME. 6 points. Championship not as obviously on the line (and even if they win that game they would still finish one game adrift of Indiana) but seriously, Wisconsin is the vanguard of the bug people.
Losing Big Ten hoops championship on missed Morgan putback. 15 points. This is a lot of points, because Michigan flat-out blew that game and then had it back in the palm of their hand not once but twice with Burke flying down court and then the putback. Winning that game means Michigan gets a banner from the best year of Big Ten basketball in decades. That one still hurts.
Losing tourney streak in hockey. 4 points. That game was always tilted towards Notre Dame and you just wanted them to get in for the streak's sake, but that streak was pretty great. Frustration factor high. Heartbreak factor not so much.
Outcome of national title game. 8 points. Conflicted. Michigan was on borrowed time after the Kansas game, played great, everything was terrific and fun, and just lost. Probably my favorite loss ever. But… so close.
Penn State outcome. 5 points. I was super mad about this, and the game did feature missed 40 and 33 yard field goals to win plus that game-tying drive. Though it meant little in retrospect, at the time it felt like Michigan had just given up a lot of ground in the division title race. Which lol, of course.
Ohio State outcome. 15 points. 11 of 13 feels bad; would be more points but by that point Michigan had outplayed expectations significantly.
Arizona outcome. 1 point. Probably a seed difference in March.
Professional baseball. 0 points, but I feel for anyone who is a fan of both Michigan and Detroit pro sports teams, as on top of all the crap listed above they've had to deal with Joe Dumars passing on Trey Burke for a guy who was so good at basketball that he led Georgia to a .500 SEC record and first round conference tourney exit, baseball happenings described above, and the continued existence of the Detroit Lions. This year the flavor is hilariously heartbreaking instead of hilariously incompetent.
I don't even know what I would do if I truly cared about those teams and Michigan. "Psychotic break" is a prime contender.
I have 55 points. This is offset by things like Michigan's tourney run and the Northwestern game, but I've built a lot of the offset into points given for the Louisville loss and seriously nobody cares about beating Northwestern as part of their overall happiness level, especially in that game.
I am all but certain that this total cannot be matched, as it requires investiture in all three sports and major things on the line. If anything is going to give it a run, though it's…
This is all based on your opinion of how much Football Armageddon was worth. The worst thing in the last 20 years of Michigan football is without question the Crable helmet-to-helmet call, and while there was still a lot of work to do even if that flag is not thrown, losing that game gets ever more heartbreaking in retrospect as it set the stage for Ohio State's dominion of the series and represents the last moment that Michigan could claim its place amongst the college football firmament. Some things fade as time goes on… next year the Arizona outcome probably wouldn't register in a post like this. Football Armageddon just looms ever larger. How many points is that worth? 40? I don't know, entirely, but it's in that ballpark.
As a bonus, that year's basketball team was 16-3 with a win against MSU on February 1st only to lose 7 of their last 9 games, including a 14(!) point loss to a miserable Purdue outfit that would finish 3-13 in the league and a 2-point home loss on the final day of the regular season against Indiana. Even then Michigan probably makes the tournament except for an opening-round loss in the Big Ten Tournament to Minnesota, which finished 5-11 in the Big Ten.
The hockey team was pretty bad that year and got a three-seed in Denver against North Dakota; North Dakota ran them out of the building. Frustration there, but not heartbreak.
Is that worse? I don't think so. Any other candidates are before my time, but if you want to make a case, uh, go ahead. 2005 was called the Year of Infinite Pain around here, but that was pure naiveté.
Mailbag: Slowing Down Offenses, Henry At NT, Smith Vs Green, #1 Jersey, Onside Piracy
As I sit here watching Missouri and Auburn roll up and down the field, with the only defense being turnovers, I'm wondering what can be done to curtail the wave of offense in football so that defenses have a chance again. Maybe people are fine with all of the offense, but it seems like it is so tough to play defense (get held on nearly every play, called one in 30 times) that I would love to see something to help even things up without drastically changing the game (such as 3 downs instead of 4 or having to go 15 yards for a first down instead of 10, etc.). I think I figured out a simple change that may help: with offenses spread out to make one on one match-ups all over the place, what if there is a rule that all of the offensive players have to line up between the numbers? This wouldn't be such a drastic change and it would allow defenses to be a little less spread out at the snap.
What do you think?
A loyal reader,
Despite the attempt to not seem drastic, that seems kind of drastic. That would affect a lot of teams from spread to, uh, concentrate. And I'm not even sure what the impact would be. If teams just stack two guys up at the numbers is that better or worse? It doesn't seem to have a huge impact. Apologies, but thumbs down.
If we're going to change football to slow down the offenses, my suggestion is to simplify and liberalize pass interference by making it a (nearly) arms-only offense. I can't stand it when a defender gets nailed for the WR trying to run through him; some of these back shoulder things are basically prayer ducks relying on the fact that the DB isn't looking and hoping he'll run over the DB. In the hypothetical world where I am king, whiskey is free and pass interference is a thing that can only happen when a defensive back uses his arms in an unfair fashion or blows a guy up early. No more of this stuff where the DB is running in a direction and the WR changes his path such that the DB is now impeding the WR. You have a right to your momentum. In exchange, offenses can have full NFL penalties for flagrant you-tackled-that-guy offenses.
Not that any of this will do much to slow down Auburn, which just runs and runs and runs and runs. They beat Alabama and their QB threw for 97 yards. They got outgained by 100 yards, but they also ran for 5.7 yards a carry against Alabama. It boggles the mind.
Moving Willie Henry?
OK, there are many candidates to play the DT next year, but few candidates to play NT if Pipkins doesn't come back strong after injury. You and others are very high on Henry at DT, but I haven't seen him mentioned at a possible NT. His weight and height look fine, but is there something about his build that makes him not well suited to play the nose?
Henry is a very plausible NT with his size and strength. Michigan lists him at 6'2", 306, which is about ideal NT size, and we've seen him throw away more than one OL this year. In an ideal world, Pipkins is full-go by late spring and playing well in fall camp, allowing Henry to continue doing his thing at three-tech.
But if that's not happening I bet we do see Henry slide over to the nose. Michigan's other options there are Richard Ash and redshirt freshman Maurice Hurst Jr, which doesn't sound too appealing. At three tech, Strobel, Poggi, and Glasgow are returning and Michigan has the option of bumping either Godin or Wormley down from SDE with Beyer the projected starter there.
A Henry move is 50/50 right now.
[After the JUMP: Smith vs Green, annual #1 jersey speculation, and evaluating a potential onside kick in The Game.]
Green was getting more PT for a reason. Was that recruiting hype? [Fuller]
Mailbag: We Should Have Been Screwed, Funk Position Paper
"I hope we're all up on the latest changes to the NCAA rule book." [Fuller]
Wait, substitution. Wait. Wait, what?
Yo Brian,
So when the bearded lady rushed into the center ring to launch the football out of the cannon through the flaming uprights at the end of the Evanston Circus, Michigan obviously made a substitution. Northwestern did not make a substitution, but they, according to the Rules, could have. If they did, it seems like that would have taken more time before the official gave the ready for play, and potentially wasted enough time to run the clock out. In this parallel universe game which is crazier than the actual circus which unfolded, does Michigan get to attempt the field goal? How are the rules applied in that situation (which thankfully did not happen)?
UPDATE: NEVERMIND the below, as I missed this section in the rulebook:
Late in the first half Team A is out of timeouts. A pass play on third down ends inbounds at the B-25 short of the line to gain with the game clock showing 0:10. Facing fourth down and three, Team A immediately hurries its field goal team onto the field. RULING: Team B should reasonably expect that Team A will attempt a field goal in this situationand should have its field-goal defense unit ready. The umpire will not stand over the ball, as there should be no issue of the defense being uncertain about the next play.
Thanks to Maize and Blue Wahoo. I will self-immolate now like a Northwestern fan observing his team playing football.
We should have been screwed. The NCAA rulebook has a specific mention of this very scenario:
Late in the first half Team A is out of timeouts. A pass play on third down ends inbounds at the B-25 short of the line to gain with the game clock showing 0:30. Facing fourth down and three, Team A gives no indication as to its next play until the game clock reads 0:10. They then rush their field goal unit onto the field, and Team B then hurries to respond.
RULING: The umpire moves to the ball to prevent the snap until Team B has had a reasonable opportunity to get its field-goal defense unit onto the field. The umpire will step away when he judges that the defense has had enough time. If the game clock reads 0:00 before the ball is snapped after the umpire steps away, the half is over.
That is in blue along with various other new rules (like "minimum time for spiking the ball") this year, so it must have just been added. If Fitz tried to substitute, the rulebook says that the refs have to let him and the clock would then run out.
This is of course terrible since it prevents the sort of exciting thing that happened against Northwestern and replaces it with the clock running out because the defense can't get aligned in time and should be immediately stricken in the name of fun… except maybe it doesn't exist?
Game ref Bill LeMonnier:
"When a team is coming out and it's the last play of the game and they substitute with their field-goal team, the defense is not given the opportunity," referee Bill LeMonnier said. "Usually there's match-up time on substitutions. When it's the field-goal attempt like that on the last play of the half, then there's no match-up given."
This is in direct contradiction of the rulebook. So… yeah. I don't know. The only thing that may reconcile these two points of view is the rulebook stating that the team getting the FG unit out there spent 20 seconds doing nothing, whereas Michigan was clearly going GO GO GO as soon as Gallon was tackled.
Spiritually, if you can't get your FG block team on the field in that situation and the other team can get the play off, screw your field goal block team. Fire drills forever.
[After THE JUMP: talking Funk, safety rotation, and the latest bizarre email.]
GIS throws this at you when you google for Darrell Funk, so congrats Firstbase
Mailbag: More Sad Football Things, All Caps Sad Football Section
Bryan Fuller
Hi Brian,
I don't pretend to know the intricacies of football but during the Nebraska game it seemed that Toussaint, in pass protection, would wait for his blocking assignment to come to him before engaging the player. Seeing as Toussaint is significantly smaller then the LB or lineman he's been assigned to block this usually resulted in Toussaint getting pushed backwards (physics and all). Is this how RBs are typically coached to play pass protection?
Jack C.
I mostly stay away from the how of any particular technique failing; more of a "what" guy since I didn't play the game, etc. But to me Toussaint's blocking issues stem from three problems:
- Michigan's line has to resort to slide protections that often expose him to a pass-rushing DE. This is a bad matchup for anyone.
- He's part of that need to resort to slide protections since his recognition isn't good; when he is tasked with identifying guys to pick up he often catches them. Vincent Smith and Mike Hart would find guys and then get some momentum before making contact.
- He hits guys too high sometimes, which makes it easy for them to shed him and attack. Smith and Hart got low, or in Smith's case existed in a perpetual state of low-ness.
3 is his problem, 2 is part his and part a holistic inability to pick up blitzes, and 1 is not his fault.
What's different about this year?
Greetings –
Regarding the offensive line, I saw some comments that intrigued me that intrigued me the other day and I'm curious your perspective.
Borges indicated that another variable in the mix this year is that it's "the first year in the scheme we've wanted to move to." Based on your work therefore, do you conclude that:
1) There is a significant difference this year in scheme, protections, and what the offense is asking of the o'line?
2) That experienced lines would be impacted by such a scheme change?
3) That inexperienced players would unimpacted (i.e. just as inexperienced)?
4) That therefore the years experience/games experience would also be negatively impacted from a production standpoint.
So that in conclusion – there's actually hope bc the ones that are young are young and the ones that are supposed to have experience have less experience than one would otherwise understand to be true.
And – that next year or the year after really will be better!
Keep up the good work.
Unfortunately, I'm not seeing a whole lot of evidence for that rationale.
Borges's comments make no sense. This year started out with Michigan running a bunch of stretch plays, which was a departure from what they'd done the first two years… and a staple of the Rodriguez offense. If that's what he meant, he could have just, you know, kept running the stretch.
Instead Michigan was almost exclusively an inside zone and power team their first two years here, and the differences between running those things from under center versus the shotgun are minimal. There has been a more concerted effort to run plays from under center, but that shift was even more pronounced late last year after Gardner took the helm of the offense.
If anything's changed this year from last year in terms of blocking it's that Denard isn't around to bail it out. Borges trying to use him to cover his ass by claiming he somehow couldn't run the schemes he wanted to be cause the guy running behind them was also the one taking the snap is a weak excuse that throws Denard (of all people!) under the bus.
[After THE JUMP: WHY WOULD YOU THINK THAT MAKES ME FEEL BETTER]


text:
External Web sites
Britannica Web sites
Articles from Britannica encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.
- Honoré Daumier - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)
(1808-79). The artist Honore Daumier is best known for his drawings satirizing 19th-century French politics and society. Also important were his paintings that helped introduce techniques of impressionism into modern art.


text:
As Lynn stated, the bank or seller is responsible for the taxes and they need to be paid first before any transfer of title can occur. The taxes owed always puts that debt in what is a "first lien position" before the finance company so in order for them to sell the property, that tax debt needs to be cleared.
To transfer title to property you must have what is called "equitable title". All encumbrances or debt would have to be cleared first.
Hope this helps you,
Stew Keene
Ph (480) 220-7491
Fax (866) 711-8573
Keller Williams - Scottsdale, AZ
2008-2009 Master of Real Estate award recipient


text:
Every few weeks or months my chain always ends up getting a tight or bent link. And buying chains can be a lot when added up all the ones I have to buy. I have probably gone through 4 since early december. Is this normal???
My 02 4300 has the stock chain and I think it works better than the SRAM 8sp I have now. I guess the geo of my bruiser has an affect on it. Its so embarrasing pedaling and this big loud "chlink" skip happens. Oh well. I thought about buying a new 8sp sram chain for around 21 bucks on the interent instead of my bike stores 30 dollar price. Where can I get a cheap chain breaker from the internet too? I don't want to have to take the wheel off and stick it in the trunk of my moms car just to take it in


text:
Chapped lips or reaction?
Once again, thank goodness for this forum. Nowhere else I could ask this question without people looking at me as if I were crazy.
DS has had sore looking lips for more than a month now, with a pink/reddish ring around the edges. At first I assumed it was chapped lips - he would keep licking them, which of course made it worse. I put chapstick on whenever I saw him do it, but he won't use it himself at school.
When the weather warmed up last week, I was glad to see it disappear, but then last night I noticed it again, just a little bit.
I'm starting to wonder if this is some type of allergic reaction? I can't think of any new foods he's been eating. Has anyone else experienced this?
If he's got eczema problems, I would definitely say it is possible. Could even be an environmental cause this time of year, KWIM?
This is the first indication we have with DD that we have to back off of dairy.... if we don't, she'll begin having much more obvious symptoms (hives around her mouth and nose, and eventually other places too, and gastrointestinal issues). The first thing she notices is the itching of her lips. They turn bright red and puffy.
Sign up for our newsletter and receive a free peanut-free snack guide.
Stay on top of your allergy with the latest news, lifestyle tips and recipes.


text:
Newegg.com - A great place to buy computers, computer parts, electronics, software, accessories, and DVDs online. With great prices, fast shipping, and top-rated customer service - once you know, you Newegg.
If you are reading this message, Please click this link to reload this page.(Do not use your browser's "Refresh" button). Please email us if you're running the latest version of your browser and you still see this message.
Newegg.com - Computer Parts, Laptops, Electronics, HDTVs, Digital Cameras and More!
Sold and Shipped by Braille Battery
Easy Install: Direct Group 31 Drop In Replacement
Lighter: Up to 65 pounds lighter
Safer: Sealed Safe Design, DOT Tested
Efficient: Stable Voltage Output, Less Stress on Alternator
Greener: Rohs Compliant Modular Design For Longer Life
Reliable: Longer Cycle Life, 3 Year Warranty, Made in the USA
Model Number: i31S
Capacity: 195 Lithium Amp Hour
Battery Name: Braille Intensity i31S Lithium Ion Starting Battery
BCI Group: Group 31
Minimum Weight (lbs): 23.7 lbs / 10.77 kg
Length: 12.91" / 327.91 mm
Width: 6.77" / 171.95 mm
Height: 9.12" / 231.64 mm
Post Type: SAE Automotive Terminal
Polarity: Left Positive (Right Custom Available)
Recommended Mounts: Group 31 Base Mounts
Voltage Class: 12 volts
Full Charge Range: 12.8-13.2 volts iM31 Marine Model Shown (pre-production)
Pulse Cranking Amps @ 80F: 2910
Cranking Amps @ 32F: 1800
Nominal Capacity (C/20 rate): 65 AH
Lead-Acid Equivalent Capacity: 195 Lithium AH (LAH)
Reserve Capacity: 140 Minutes
Internal Resistance (ohms): 2.5 milliohms (.025 ohms)
Life Cycle @ 80% DOD: Up to 2000 cycles
Life Cycle @ 10% DOD: Up to 5000 cycles
Alternator: Automotive, Marine and Cycle Compatible
Battery charger: Braille 12310L - 10 AH Lithium Ion Battery Charger
Rapid Recharge: Braille 12325L - 25 AH Lithium Ion Battery Charger
Maximum Charge Current (10 sec): 130 amps @ 14.4 Volts
Maximum Charge Current @70F: 65 amp/hr @ 14.4-14.8 Volts
Maximum Charge Voltage @70F: 14.8
Recommended Charge Voltage: 14.4
Warranty: 36 Months Pro-Rata; 12 Month Free Service/Replacement
This item is eligible for Newegg Premier benefits. Are you a Newegg Premier Member? If not, sign up today and get:
Your request will be processed within the next 24 hours.
Please add "firstname.lastname@example.com" to your address book to ensure delivery.See Today's E-Blast Promo


text:
Just to pass on the news, I have reached 1074 miles as of today. Hit the 1000 mile marker on the 17th and didn't realize it. 1/3 of the way through my goals already.
Just to pass on the news, I have reached 1074 miles as of today. Hit the 1000 mile marker on the 17th and didn't realize it. 1/3 of the way through my goals already.
As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord!
Joshua 24:15
Good work. Ouch, for me I'm under 800 and in the hole for my 3,500 goal in 07.
Congrats, Sandwarrior! I'm so far behind on my 2007 goal I have started riding backwards. You're doing great!!!
2015 Sirrus Elite
2012 Masi Evoluzione
Proud member of the original Club Tombay
great job Sandwarrior...I clicked over 1000 today, hoping to reach 3000 this year. I am sure you will make it.
Good job, Sandwarrior. I'm actually ahead of the pace I need for my goal. This is the first time that's happened before summer.
* 2009 RANS XStream
* 2007 RANS Stratus XP
* 2006 Bacchetta Corsa
My Blog - uneasy-rider.com
They told me it's ok to post mileage over in the commuting forum, so you'll probably find me there these days.
That's great!
I'm just hoping I come in the same as I did last year. Still, even though I might be getting fewer miles in, they're *harder* miles. I can live with that. I guess
'13 Felt Z3 - '08 Jamis Aurora Elite - ('07 Giant OCR C2)
Thank you for all the well wishes. Congrats to all of you on track or ahead of your goals. For those of you behind the power curve...keep up the fight and don't get discouraged
As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord!
Joshua 24:15
Have you considered adding a magnet or two to your front wheel to help catch up to goal? I was fretting the other night about that problem myself and that option seems like it has a lot of potential.Originally Posted by Digital Gee
It's all downhill from here. Except the parts that are uphill.
WTG Sandwarrior. To be honest, I'm just a teensy bit ahead of pace for the year myself, not quite where you are, but happy with where I am. I swear, I'm having the time of my life riding a bike for fun again.Originally Posted by Sandwarrior
It's all downhill from here. Except the parts that are uphill.
I'm way behind my goal for the year, but I had a six week + layoff somewhere back there when my knee acted up. What this is teaching me is that while the goal is cool to have and pursue on some level, it's also absolutely arbitrary and meaningless on another. I have fifty rides in already -- many of them are short little rides I squeeze in here and there, so the overall mileage is "only" about 500 miles so far, but you know what? I've had fun 50 times already this year. So I guess my knee problem has helped me see the relative importance of goals and milestones -- still love 'em when I get to 'em, but what's even MORE important (to me) is making sure I'm out there having fun. And I am.
And I also try to remember that even 500 miles, to a non-cyclist, is absolutely unbelievable anyway! So I still have bragging rights with most of my friends...
2015 Sirrus Elite
2012 Masi Evoluzione
Proud member of the original Club Tombay
I thought I would make 3500 miles with no problem. With the bad fit and my knee, then my crash and a few cracked ribs. Now, I just got done with foot surgery. I have had a lot of fun though, but I guess it came with a price. I got just under 2900 miles for my year starting in July. Do you think I can get another 600 miles by July 1st ? The foot wasn't bike related.
Good job, keep the wheels spinning.
I'm at 1500 and about 200mi behind where I should be, too much business travel in Jan. At the end of the day a goal is a goal and if I don't make it it doesn't bother too much. I'm lucky that I can ride almost everyday down here, no weather to slow you down.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large
2013 Noah RS
That's terrific!! Keep up the nice pace!


text:
Trending: Memorial Day | Grad Gifts | Cavaliers | Warriors | Sharks | Penguins
Last purchased 14 hours ago
Checking inventory..
Decadent coffee and a spoonful of Denver Broncos pride are all you need to start your day off right! This ceramic mug will keep 11 oz. of your favorite breakfast beverage rich and warm. Everyone will see you're serious about your coffee and your Denver Broncos with its striking graphics.
Help us make our site better for everyone! Let us know you've found something wrong
or frustrating on this page and we will improve it. Please mark each that apply.
If you have a question for customer service or if you would just like to leave us
some feedback, please view our FAQs.
Receive Team Updates:
Stay updated on sales, new items and more for your favorite teams.
Connect with Us
Secure Shopping
Payment Options
FansEdge, Inc., All Rights Reserved


text:
I asked all my FB followers if they had any suggestions for what to do with cod. You know what they gave me? NOTHING. Whaaa?? No one had any ideas? Well, I shouldn't judge. I was the one who didn't know what to do with it in the first place. It's just not my first choice in fish. I don't know why… I just didn't grow up knowing much about cod.
Jess and I were walking through the food section at our local target and they had a sale on fish. The cod was cheaper than the salmon and I'd never cooked with it before so I figured I'd give it a shot! I'm glad I did because I made this sandwich and it was goooood.
You really can't go wrong with BLTs of any kind. They're so versatile! Add avocado, add a meat or veggie pattie, add an egg, add whatever you want. It'll probably work just fine. Today's addition was panko breaded cod pan-fried in bacon grease. Umm… yes please. It was succulent and filling and just the right kind of salty. It's the working girl's version of "surf and turf". And this working girl LOVED IT.
Bacon Fried Cod BLTs
Servings: 2
PointsPlus Per Serving: 11
- 2 fillets uncooked thawed Atlantic cod, 8 PP
- 4 slices Trader Joe's 14 grain bread, 8 PP
- 4 slices center-cut bacon, 2 PP
- 1 slice reduced-fat cheddar cheese split in half, 2 PP
- 1/4 cup panko bread crumbs, 1 PP
- sprinkling each of salt, garlic powder, black pepper, chili powder, ground yellow mustard, turmeric and parsley (or a seasoning of your own)
- 1 tbsp light mayo, 1 PP
- 1 tsp lemon juice
- 1/2 tsp hot sauce
- lettuce
- sliced tomato
1. Place your bacon in a cast iron skillet or non-stick pan. Turn up to medium-low and cook to your level of done-ness.
2. While the bacon is cooking, take out your fish, rinse off gently and pat dry. Set to the side while you mix your panko bread crumbs and spices in a flat bottomed bowl or dish. You can also get out the bread and toast it while you're waiting for the bacon to finish cooking.
3. Once the bacon is done, drain on a paper towel, but keep the grease in the pan. Take your fish and spray each side with some Pam and coat in panko mixture. Put the breaded fish in the pan with the bacon grease and cook about 3-4 minutes per side.
4. While the fish is cooking, slice up your tomato, wash your lettuce and make the spiced mayo. You'll mix together the mayo, lemon juice and hot sauce. I used tabasco, but you can use any hot sauce you like. If you want it more spicy, add extra hot sauce. Spread the mayo on two of your four pieces of bread. Then, put on the lettuce, tomato, bacon, cheese and fish. Best served hot, but saving it for lunch works too!


text:
ABA Approved Since 1959
Texas College of Law is located in the heart of Houston�??s downtown legal and financial district.
In addition to being the only private law school in the city, it is also the
oldest. Its student body is one of the largest and the most diverse in Texas. Since the college
is situated in the center of the nation�??s fourth-largest city, it is uniquely
suited to serve the needs of its students while cultivating a rich and
rewarding learning environment. A dynamic energy exists between the faculty,
student body, and the community�??s 6,000 practicing attorneys who are walking
distance of the law school
college has grown enormously since its founding in 1923. It now boasts a
full-time faculty of 60 and an adjunct faculty of approximately 40
practitioners. This deep faculty base allows the school to maintain an 18.8 to
1 student faculty ration, while building a strong student body of about 1,237
students. More than 75 percent of the current students attend South
Texas on a full-time basis. Many of the part-time students are
second-career professionals---the very students for whom the law school was
founded. The part-time program remains flexible enough to allow part-time
students to attend day and/or evening classes while fulfilling their obligations
at home or office.
college strives to provide the best combination of practical skills and
scholarly training through the classroom and its four Centers of Excellence the
Board of Advocates; the Frank Evans Center for Conflict Resolution, the Transactional Practice Center; and the Corporate Compliance Center.
its first Center
of Excellence, the Board
of Advocates, the college has established a winning legacy in national moot
court and mock trial advocacy competitions. Indisputably, South
Texas is the best in the country, with over 100 national titles to
its credit. This winning record far exceeds what any other law school in the
nation has been able to accomplish. The advocacy program is further
complemented by a strong curricular emphasis on courtroom skills training and
legal writing, giving students a firm foundation from which to excel in the courtroom.
To further
enhance the college�??s well-regarded advocacy program, as well as support other school-wide
activities, a $3 million courtroom complex was completed in 2003. The project includes
The T Gerald Treece Courtroom (aptly named after its
long-time advocacy director and founder), the Advocacy Hall of Champions, where
all names of past national champions are displayed, and the Advocacy Center,
housing offices and a large meeting room for tournament preparation.
emphasis on skills training takes many forms, beginning in the first year with
rigorous mandatory courses in legal analysis, research, writing, and oral
communications. It extends into the upper division curriculum with a range of
clinical course offerings spanning form direct representation clinics to field
placement externships and simulated advocacy and mediation courses. In the law
school�??s various direct client representation clinics, students work with actual
clients on pending disputes under the supervision of full-time faculty and staff
A host off-site internships are available to allow students to experience the actual
practice of law in settings as diverse as pro bono law firms and government
agencies, state and federal courts, and prosecutor�??s offices. Students use the
experiences garnered in these placements as the 9 text 9 of seminars which
explore skills development and system design. Additionally, in simulation
courses, students are able to expand their mediation, pretrial and trial level
skills through a combination of lectures, demonstrations, role playing
activities and professor critiques. Full time faculty involvement, along with a
strong cadre of local jurists and leading practitioners, allows the law school
to take full advantage of its urban location for these skill courses.
complement its strong tradition of advocacy and skills development, the law
school also offers three other Centers of Excellence. The Frank Evans
Center for Conflict
Resolution provides students training in mediation, arbitration, and other forms
of alternative dispute resolution through classes, seminars, and volunteer
opportunities. The Transactional
Practice Center
focuses on teaching the core skills and knowledge needed to engage in a
transactional law practice. For example, students have opportunities to learn
and gain experience in contract negotiation and drafting and putting together a
major transaction such as a real estate purchase or a corporate acquisition.
The center combines coursework and skills development, granting a certificate
of specialization in transactional skills to those who qualify. The college�??s Corporate Compliance Center
involves students interested in working as in-house counsel, outside counsel,
and business law. The center hosts two topical programs each year exploring how
companies promote policies and procedures to assure legal and ethical behavior.
South Texas students are engaged in a variety of co-curricular
activities, including publishing the South Texas Law Review, the Corporate
Counsel Review, the Construction Law Journal and the Texas
Journal of Business Law Journal, and Currents International Trade Law
Journal participate in more than 30 student organization and law
fraternities. Many of the student organizations focus on specific areas of the
law and others are affinity organizations. The college is home to the First and
Fourteenth Courts of Appeals allowing students to easily observe live appellate
arguments by some of the best attorneys in the country.
The South
Texas College of Law Fred Parks Law Library is one of the largest in Texas, housing more than
511,900 volumes. Particular strengths of the collection include materials in
English law, international business, materials on trial and appellate advocacy.
The collection also contains research material, original transcripts, trial
exhibits and video-taped depositions from the famous Texaco v. Pennzoil case,
the first $10-billion dollar jury verdict ever awarded.
unique materials provide students and legal researchers the opportunity to study
in depth one of the landmark cases in the arena of complex litigation. The
six-story Fred Parks Law Library contains over 81,000 square feet and includes
more than 750 study seats equipped with internet connections, a wireless
network, an abundance of study, seminar and conference rooms, a new computer
center; and the Emilie Slohm conference and dining
center, a multi-use penthouse suite with a large dining room and a rooftop
terrace for relaxation and recreational use.
Texas regularly hosts large or highly publicized trials, debates and events in
the law school�??s Joe M. Green Jr. Auditorium, the largest courtroom in Texas with more than 700
seats. The 240-seat Garrett-Townes Hall is also designed as a courtroom and is
equipped with remote control video capability. Students and faculty benefit
from computer, video, and audio technology in every classroom at South Texas.
All told, the exemplary facilities,
access to practicing attorneys, and top-notch faculty coalesce to educate
well-rounded attorneys.
and Dean: Donald J. Guter (713) 646-1819
Administration - Associate Dean: Bruce A. McGovern (713) 646-2920
Affairs - Associate Dean: Helen B. Jenkins (713) 646-1887
Administration and Skills Training - Associate Dean:
Green Burnett (713) 646-1831
Assistance and Student Counseling - Assistant Dean:
Gena Singleton (713) 646-2975
- Assistant Dean: Alicia
Cramer (713) 646-1810
Resources - Assistant Dean: Reginald Green (713) 646-1806
Legal Education - Director and Professor of Law:
Lisa Dahm (713) 646-1847
and Alumni Relations - V.P.: Kim Parker (713) 646-1803
Resources - V.P.: Steve
Alderman (713) 646-1812
Library - V.P., Director of Library Services, Professor:
G. Cowan (713) 646-1729
and Financial Aid - Director: Mary Braxton (713) 646-1824
Services - Interim Registrar: Mandi Gibson (713) 646-1702
J. GUTER, (Law Professor), born Latrobe, Pennsylvania, June 26, 1948; admitted to
bar, 1977, Pennsylvania.
Education: University of Colorado (B.A.,
1970); Duquesne University School
of Law (J.D., 1977). COURSES: Military Law. Email: dguter @ stcl.edu
J. ALFINI, (Law Professor), born Yonkers, New York, October 12, 1943; admitted to bar, 1973, New
York; 1976, Illinois; 2005, Texas. Education: Columbia
University (B.A., 1965); Northwestern
University School
of Law (J.D., 1972). COURSES:
Mediation Theory and Practice, Constitutional Law, Professional Responsibility.
Email: jalfini @ stcl.edu
BAUMAN, (Law Professor),
born Albuquerque, New Mexico, May 14, 1953; admitted to bar,
1978, California.
Education: Pomona College (B.A., 1975); Stanford University
(J.D., 1978). COURSES:Torts,
Civil Rights Actions, Consumer Transactions, Remedies, Federal Courts. Email:jbauman @ stcl.edu
A. BERGIN, (Law Professor), born Worcester, Massachusetts, November 7, 1970; admitted to bar,
1998, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 2000, New York. Education: University of Massachusetts
(B.A., 1994); University of Baltimore (J.D., 1998); New York University
(LL.M., 1999). COURSES:Constitutional
Law, Critical Race Theory, Women in Law. Email:kbergin @ stcl.edu
GREENE BURNETT, (Law Professor), born Thunder Bay,
Ontario, Canada, April 18, 1951; admitted to bar, 1976, Texas. Education: University of Texas (B.A., 1973; J.D., 1976). COURSES:Skills and Clinical
Teaching, Criminal Procedure, International Criminal Law and Procedure, Capital
Punishment, Legal Research and Writing. Email:cburnett @ stcl.edu
A. CARLSON, (Law Professor), born St. Louis, Missouri, April 26, 1954; admitted to bar,
1979, Texas. Education:
Southern Illinois University (B.S., 1974); McMaster
University (M.A., 1975); South Texas
College of Law (J.D.,
1979). COURSES: Pretrial, Trial and Appellate, Civil Procedure (Texas and Federal),
Professional Responsibility. Email:ecarlson
@ stcl.edu
R. CARLSON, (Law Professor), born Columbus, Ohio, May 28, 1954; admitted to bar, 1979, Georgia;
1986, Texas. Education: Wake Forest University
(B.A., 1976); University
of Georgia (J.D., 1979). COURSES:Labor Law,
Employment Discrimination, Family Law. Email:rcarlson @ stcl.edu
J. CARNAHAN, (Law Professor), born Los Angeles, California;
admitted to bar, 1987, Texas.
Education: University of Arkansas
(B.A., 1976); South Texas College
of Law (J.D., 1986); University of Houston
Law Center
(LL.M., 2000). COURSES: Criminal Procedure, Health Law and Bioethics. Email:scarnahan @ stcl.edu
S. CORN, (Law Professor), born New York, New
York; admitted to bar, 1992, Virginia. Education: Hartwick College (B.A., 1983); George
Washington Law
School (J.D., 1992); The U. S.
Army Judge Advocate General�??s School (LL.M., 1996). COURSES:Criminal Law, Prosecutorial Ethics, Criminal
Procedure, National Security Law, Law of Armed Conflict, Comparative
Counter-Terrorism Law. Email: gcorn @ stcl.edu
DAVID G. COWAN, (Law Professor), born Mountain Home, Arkansas,
November 12, 1953; admitted to bar, 1979, Arkansas. Education: University of Arkansas
at Fayetteville (B.A., 1975; J.D., 1978); University of Missouri,
(M.A.L.S., 1984). COURSES: Legal Research Skills, Law and Technology. Email:
dcowan @ stcl.edu
W. CRUMP, (Law Professor), born Fresno, California, February 24, 1947; admitted to
bar, 1975, Texas.
Education: University of Bordeaux; University of California
(B.A., 1968); Southern Methodist University; University of Houston
(J.D., 1974). COURSES: Criminal Law, Evidence, Federal Jurisdiction,
Practice and Procedure. Email:scrump
@ stcl.edu
P. DAVIS, (Law Professor), born Harlingen, Texas,
May 8, 1944; admitted to bar, 1972, Texas.
Education: University of Houston (B.S., 1967); South Texas
College of Law (J.D.,
1972). COURSES:Pretrial,
Trial and Appellate Procedure, Commercial Paper, Contracts and Equity. Email:bdavis @ stcl.edu
L. DEGRAW, (Law Professor), born Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 7, 1940; admitted to bar,
1975, Wisconsin; 1977, Arizona;
1979, Illinois; 1981, California; 1986, Texas. Education: University of Wisconsin-Madison
(B.B.A., 1966; M.S., 1971); Marquette University (J.D., 1975); Harvard University
(LL.M., 1984). COURSES:Taxation,
Estate Planning, Wills, Trusts and Estates, Professional Responsibility. Email:
sdegraw @ stcl.edu
A. DENNIS, (Law Professor), born Louisville, Kentucky, June 7, 1955; admitted to bar,
1984, Texas. Education:
Hollins College (B.A., 1977); South Texas
College of Law (J.D., 1984). COURSES:Criminal, Civil and Judicial Externships, Introduction
to Law, Legal Method, Legal Research and Writing. Email: edennis @ stcl.edu
DAVID EAST, (Law Professor), born Madill, Oklahoma, March 18, 1945; admitted to bar,
1973, Texas; 1974, Nevada;
1979, California.
Education: Baylor University (B.A., 1971; J.D., 1973); George Washington
University (LL.M., 1978).
COURSES: Contracts, Commercial Law (UCC), Bankruptcy, Property. Email:deast @ stcl.edu
J. FESTA, (Law Professor), born Atlantic City,
New Jersey, September 6, 1973;
admitted to bar, 2002, Texas.
Education: University of Notre Dame (B.A., 1995); Murray
State University
(M.P.A., 2001); Vanderbilt University (M.A., 2002); Vanderbilt Law
School (J.D., 2002). COURSES:Property, Land Use,
Wills, Trusts and Estates, Government. Email:mfesta @ stcl.edu
FIELD, (Law Professor),
born Chicago, Illinois,
1965; admitted to bar, 2002, Illinois;
2003, U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit. Education: University
of Illinois
at Chicago (B.A., 1987); Northwestern University (M.S., 1990); John Marshall
Law School
(J.D., summa cum laude, 2002). COURSES:Patents, Torts, Professional Responsibility,
Evidence. Email:tfield
@ stcl.edu
FINEGAN, (Law Professor), born Alexandria, Virginia, April 1, 1974; admitted to bar, 2001,
Virginia; 2003, New York. Education: University
of Virginia (B.A., 1996); Washington College of Law
(J.D., 2001); Columbia
Law School
(LL.M., 2005). COURSES:Legal
Research and Writing. Email:sfinegan
@ stcl.edu
E. GEORGE, (Law Professor), born Los Angeles, California,
December 14, 1952; admitted to bar, 1977, Texas. Education: University of Texas
(B.S., 1973; M.L.S., 1974; J.D., 1977). COURSES:Marital Property, Texas Trial and Appellate Procedure, Family
Law. Email:pgeorge @
D. GOODMAN, (Law Professor), born Washington, D.C., December 12, 1964; admitted to bar,
1990, Texas. Education:
Brandeis University
(B.A., 1987); University of Texas School
of Law (J.D., 1990). COURSES:Legal Analysis,
Research and Writing, Appellate Advocacy, Class Action Litigation. Email: mgoodman @ stcl.edu
RICHARD J. GRAVING, (Law Professor), born Duluth, Minnesota, August 24, 1929; admitted to bar, 1953, Minnesota; 1956, New York;
1968, Pennsylvania; 1982, Texas. Education: University of Minnesota
(B.A., 1950); Harvard
University (J.D., 1953). COURSES:International Law,
Comparative Law, International Civil Litigation, Conflict of Laws,
International Human Rights, Contracts. Email:rgraving @ stcl.edu
F. HOLLAND, (Law Professor), born Ithaca, New York, June 25, 1950; admitted to bar,
1977, North Carolina; 1991, Texas. Education: U.S. Military
Academy (B.S., 1972);
Duke University School of Law (J.D., 1977). COURSES:Legal Research and Writing, Evidence, Criminal Law,
Military Law, Criminal Trial Advocacy. Email: rholland
@ stcl.edu
BISHOP JENKINS, (Law Professor), born Baltimore,
Maryland, November 26, 1947;
admitted to bar, 1984, Texas.
Education: Peabody Conservatory of Johns Hopkins Institute (B.Mus.Ed.,
1969); Howard University
(M.M.Ed., 1975); University of Houston
(J.D., 1983). COURSES:Wills,
Trusts and Estates, Property, Estate Administration. Email:hjenkins @ stcl.edu
RANDALL KELSO, (Law Professor), born Indianapolis, Indiana, November 12, 1955; Education: University of Chicago
(B.A., 1976); University
of Wisconsin-Madison (J.D.,
1979). COURSES: Constitutional Law, Contracts, Jurisprudence. Email: rkelso @ stcl.edu
K. LEAHY, (Law Professor), born Washington, District
of Columbia, 1972; admitted to bar, 1998, New York and U.S. District Court, Eastern
and Southern Districts of New York; 2000,
District of Columbia.
Education: Swarthmore College (B.A., 1994); New York University
(J.D., magna cum laude, 1997). COURSES:Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, Agency and
Partnership. Email:jleahy
@ stcl.edu
P. LEWINBUK, (Law Professor), born Moscow, Russia, February 4, 1972; admitted
to bar, 2001, District of Columbia and Minnesota. Education:
Minnesota State
University (B.A., 1994); John Marshall
Law School
(J.D., 2000). COURSES:Legal
Research and Writing. Email:klewinbuk
@ stcl.edu
J. LUKE, (Law Professor), born 1954; admitted to bar, 1992, Texas. Education: Lamar University
(B.S., 1977); University of Texas Medical Branch (B.S., 1978); South Texas College of Law (J.D.,1992); University of Houston (LL.M., 1996). COURSES: Live Client Legal Clinics, Interviewing and
Counseling. Email: bluke @ stcl.edu
A. MCGOVERN, (Law Professor), born Portland, Maine,
1962; admitted to bar, 1989, Connecticut;
1990, New York; 1991, D.C.; 1994, Maine. Education: Columbia University
(B.A., 1984); Fordham University School
of Law (J.D., 1989); University of Florida
College of Law (LL.M., 1996). COURSES:Federal Income Taxation, Corporate and Partnership
Taxation, International Taxation, Agency and Partnership, Corporations. Email:bmcgovern @ stcl.edu
A.D. MOORE, (Law Professor), born Baltimore, Maryland, February 16, 1959; admitted to
bar, 1985, Maryland.
Education: Towson State University
(B.A., 1981); University of Baltimore (J.D., 1983); Harvard University
Law School
(LL.M., 1992). COURSES: Property, Criminal Law, Criminal
Trial Advocacy. Email: smoore @ stcl.edu
MOSES, (Law Professor),
born Sedge, Texas, January 9, 1941; admitted
to bar, 1965, Texas.
Education: University of Texas at Austin (B.A.,
1963; J.D., 1965); Northwestern University (LL.M., 1970); Southern Methodist University (S.J.D., 1978). COURSES:Criminal Law,
Criminal Procedure. Email:rmoses
@ stcl.edu
MOYA, (Law Professor),
born Weslaco, Texas, December 27, 1959; admitted to bar, 1984, Texas. Education:
University of Texas at Austin
(B.A., 1981; J.D., 1984). COURSES:Environmental
Law, International Environmental Law, Toxic Torts, Administrative Law,
Legislation. Email:omoya
@ stcl.edu
L. MUSSELMAN, (Law Professor), born Peoria, Illinois, August 4, 1951; admitted to bar, 1980,
Colorado; 1985, Arizona; 1990, Texas. Education: Illinois Central
College (A.A., 1972); Illinois State
University (B.S., 1973); J. Rueben Clark
Law School,
Brigham Young University
(J.D., 1979). COURSES: Federal Income Tax, Taxation and Commercial Law,
Commercial Bankruptcy, Texas
Marital Property. Email:jmusselman
@ stcl.edu
ORTIZ, (Law Professor),
born San Antonio, Texas, October 11, 1964; admitted to bar,
1989, Texas. Education:
University of Texas at Austin (B.A., 1986); Harvard Law
School (J.D., 1989). COURSES:Property,
Environmental Law, International Environmental Law, Natural Resources and Water
Law, Animal Law. Email: fortiz @ stcl.edu
E. PAGE, (Law Professor), born Memphis, Tennessee,
August 3, 1949; admitted to bar, 1980, Tennessee.
Education: University of Tennessee (B.S., 1971); Memphis
State University
(J.D., 1980); New York
University (LL.M., 1983).
COURSES: Contracts, Copyright, Trademark, Unfair Competition, Communications,
Art and Entertainment. Email:ppage
@ stcl.edu
W. PAULSEN, (Law Professor), born Eau Claire, Wisconsin, February 17, 1954; admitted to
bar, 1984, Texas.
Education: Texas Christian University
(B.F.A., 1976); Baylor University (J.D., 1984); Harvard University
Law School
(LL.M., 1992). COURSES:Civil
Procedure, Jurisprudence, Community Property, Legal History, Legal Research. Email:jpaulsen @ stcl.edu
PETERS, (Law Professor), born Trenton, Missouri, 1974; admitted to bar, 1999, Texas. Education: Texas Tech University (B.A., 1996); Texas Tech
University School
of Law (J.D., 1999). COURSES:
Legal Research and Writing. Email: apeters
@ stcl.edu
FLEMING POWERS, (Law Professor), born Newark, Ohio, October 6, 1948; admitted to bar, 1978, Texas. Education: University of Texas (B.A., 1970); University of Houston
(J.D., 1978). COURSES: Contracts, Professional Responsibility, Remedies.
Email:jpowers @
L. REED, (Law Professor), born Houston, Texas, December 16, 1923; admitted to bar, 1948, Texas.
Education: University of Texas (B.A., 1943); University of Texas
School of Law (J.D., 1948). COURSES:Oil and Gas, Admiralty, Federal Courts.
L. RENSBERGER, (Law Professor), born Goshen,
Indiana, June 20, 1958; admitted
to bar, 1984, Indiana.
Education: Wabash College (B.A., 1980); Indiana
University at Bloomington (J.D., 1983). COURSES: Civil
Procedure, Conflict of Laws, Torts. Email:jrensberger @ stcl.edu
W. "ROCKY" RHODES, IV, (Law
Professor), born Arlington, Texas, December
8, 1967; admitted to bar, 1992, Texas.
Education: Baylor
University (B.B.A., 1990;
J.D., 1992). COURSES:Civil
Procedure, Constitutional Law, First Amendment, State Constitutional Law,
Complex Litigation, Federal Courts. Email:rrhodes @ stcl.edu
RICKS, (Law Professor),
born Rexburg, Idaho, December 20, 1965; admitted to bar,
1992, Utah. Education:
Ricks College
(A.A., 1987); Brigham
Young University
(B.A., 1989; J.D., 1992). COURSES:Contracts,
Agency and Partnership, Corporations, Securities Regulation, Jurisprudence. Email:vricks @ stcl.edu
ROSIN, (Law Professor),
born San Antonio, Texas, September 25, 1950; admitted to bar,
1975, Texas. Education:
Texas A & MUniversity
(B.S., 1972); University
of Texas (J.D., 1975). COURSES:Agency and Partnership,
Banking Law, Corporations, Payment Systems and Securities Regulation. Email:grosin @ stcl.edu
J. MATHIS RUTLEDGE, (Law Professor), born Ann
Arbor, Michigan; Education: Spelman College (B.A., 1993); Harvard Law
School (J.D., 1996). COURSES:
Legal Research and Writing, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Labor and
Employment Law, Civil Litigation. Email:nmathis @ stcl.edu
SIEGEL, (Law Professor),
born New Rochelle, New York, April 21, 1958; admitted to bar,
1983, Georgia; 1985, Florida. Education: University of Florida
(B.S., B.A., 1979); Florida State University
(J.D., 1983); Emory
University (LL.M., 1988).
Income Taxation, Estate and Gift Taxation, Estate Planning, Wills, Trusts and
Estates. Email:msiegel
@ stcl.edu
T. SOLOMON, (Law Professor), born New York, June 2, 1965;
admitted to bar, 1991, New York.
Education: University of Michigan
(B.A., 1987); Boston
University School
of Law (J.D., 1990). COURSES:Legal
Research and Writing, Appellate, Civil Practice Advocacy. Email:asolomon @ stcl.edu
A. SPARLING, (Law Professor), born Glens Falls,
New York, September 28, 1953;
admitted to bar, 1989, New York; 1994, Texas. Education: Dartmouth College
(B.A., 1975); Columbia
University (J.D., 1988). COURSES:Legal Research and
Writing, Privacy Law. Email:sparling
@ stcl.edu
STEINER, (Law Professor), born New Orleans,
Louisiana, April 30, 1955; admitted
to bar, 1983, Texas.
Education: University of Texas (B.A., 1978); University of Houston
(J.D., 1982; Ph.D., 1993). COURSES:American
Legal History, Asian Americans and the Law, Consumer Transactions, Torts,
Internet Legal Research. Email: msteiner @
STEVENSON, (Law Professor), born Ann Arbor, Michigan, March 11, 1968; admitted to bar, 1999,
Connecticut; 2000, New York. Education: Wheaton College
(B.A., 1989); University of Connecticut School
of Law (J.D., 1999); Yale Law School (LL.M., 2002). COURSES:Law and Economics,
Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Administrative Law, Environmental Law,
Nonprofit Corporations, Legislation. Email: dstevenson
@ stcl.edu
O. TAYLOR, (Law Professor), born Columbia, South Carolina, March 7, 1958; admitted to
bar, 1983, Georgia.
Education: Harvard University, Radcliffe (A.B., 1980); University of Georgia
(J.D., 1983); Georgetown
University (LL.M., 1990).
COURSES: International Business Transactions, International Civil
Litigation, Civil Procedure. Email:ctaylor
@ stcl.edu
GERALD TREECE, (Law Professor), born Midland, Texas, April 9, 1945; admitted to bar,
1972, Texas. Education: University
of Houston (B.A., 1967;
J.D., 1969). COURSES:Torts,
Constitutional Law, Appellate Advocacy. Email:gtreece @ stcl.edu
E. WHEELER, (Law Professor), born Fort Smith, Arkansas, August 24, 1949; admitted to bar,
1979, Arkansas.
Education: Arkansas Tech University
(B.A., 1972); University of Arkansas at Little
Rock (J.D., 1979). COURSES:Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Gaming Law,
Juvenile Law, Corporate and White Collar Crime. Email:mwheeler @ stcl.edu
L. WILKS, (Law Professor), born Fort Wayne, Indiana, November 12, 1931; admitted to bar,
1955, Indiana and Michigan. Education: Yale University
(B.A., 1952); University of Michigan (J.D., 1955); George Washington
University (LL.M., 1973).
COURSES: Evidence, Insurance, Civil Procedure. Email: wwilks @ stcl.edu
WORLEY, (Law Professor),
born Elberton, Georgia, July 14, 1954; admitted to
bar, 1981, Georgia.
Education: University of Georgia (A.B., 1975; J.D., 1980); Rice University
(M.A., 2005). COURSES:Bankruptcy,
Commercial Law, Contracts, Jurisprudence Payment Systems, Secured Transactions.
Email:jjworley @
M. YAMAMOTO, (Law Professor), born Los Angeles, California,
August 4, 1963; admitted to bar, 1993, California.
Education: University of California at Davis (B.S., 1987); University of San Diego
(J.D., 1992); University
of Florida (LL.M., 1995).
COURSES: Individual Income Tax, Corporate Tax, Estate and Gift Taxation,
Estate Planning, Partnership Taxation, Taxation of Business Organizations. Email:kyamamoto @ stcl.edu
R. ZINNECKER, (Law Professor), born Owosso, Michigan, July 20, 1959; admitted to bar,
1989, Texas. Education:
Central Missouri
State University
(B.S.B.A., 1981); Brigham
Young University
(J.D., 1986). COURSES:Banking,
Consumer Bankruptcy, Electronic Commerce, Secured Transactions, Payment
Systems. Email:tzinnecker
@ stcl.edu


text:
Marissa V-Neck Dress
Product Actions
Additional Information
Shimmer in this stunning lace shift dress from morning 'til night.
- V-neckline.
- Sleeveless.
- V-back.
- Concealed center back zipper with hook-and-eye closure.
- Allover lace with metallic detailing. Mesh-trim hemline.
- Self: Cotton, Nylon, Polyester, Rayon novelty.
- Contrast 1: Nylon, Metallic mesh. Contrast 2: Polyester tulle.
- Lining: Polyester crepe de chine.
- Dry Clean Only.
- Imported.
- Measures approximately 32.5" from shoulder to hem.
- Classic fit.
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®by PowerReviews
Reviewed by 1 customer
Comments about BCBGMAXAZRIAGROUP Marissa V-Neck Dress:
Beuttiful dress and Perfect fit. Is my second dress that I bougth online from BCBG.
- Size and Fit:
- True to size
- How old are you?:
- 35 to 44


text:
Head Lice
Table of Contents
- Head lice facts
- What are head lice?
- How common is head lice infestation?
- Who is at risk for getting head lice?
- How in the world does a child get head lice?
- What do head lice look like?
- Where are head lice most commonly found?
- What are the signs and symptoms of head lice infestation?
- How is a head lice infestation diagnosed?
- What is the treatment for a head lice infestation (pediculosis)?
- What is the treatment for a head lice infestation (pediculosis)? (Continued)
- My child has head lice. I don't. Should I treat myself to prevent being infested?
- Should my pets be treated for head lice?
- My child is under 2 years of age and has been diagnosed with head lice. Can I treat my child with prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) drugs?
- What OTC medications are available to treat head lice?
- What prescription drugs treat head lice?
- Are any home remedies effective at getting rid of head lice?
- Which head lice medicine is best for me?
- What are the rules with head lice medicines?
- Is it possible to prevent head lice?
- Should household sprays be used to kill adult lice?
- Should I have a pest-control company spray my house to get rid of lice?
- What is the prognosis of a head lice infestation?
How in the world does a child get head lice?
A child can contract head lice in a number of ways.
- Contact with an already infested person (Personal contact is common during play, school, or sports activities, and at school, home, slumber parties, or camp.)
- Wearing infested clothing, such as hats, scarves, coats, sports uniforms, or hair ribbons
- Using infested combs, brushes, or towels
- Lying on a bed, couch, pillow, carpet, or stuffed animal that has recently been in contact with a person with lice (though there is evidence that the risk is very low if more than 48 hours has passed since the exposure) Continue Reading
3/11Reviewed on 11/5/2015
TOP 10 How to Get Rid of Head Lice Related Articles