text:
Back to the most recent entries.
Comments to Webmaster
Dear Andrea, this post is OT, but if you'll have 2 minutes downtime, try to look at it, you'll be definitely intrigued because we are talking about SPACE technology and SECRET PATENTS!
The actuators of the next Webb space telescope mirrors are hexapod structures attached to the rear of each of its 18 hexagonal mirrors, designed to move and bend them independently up to 1/10,000th the thickness of a human hair to achieve a perfect focus, at 50 degrees above absolute zero… it seems that mirror actuator technology is proprietary, and government and NASA must respect the intellectual property of its industry partners. Some details of the structure visible in these videos were then censored in key areas, as seen here from 40″:
and here from 20″:
…but curiously go and see here from 25″:
and especially in this sharp photo, behind the secondary mirror where an identical, smaller hexapod is applied:
At NASA they are amateurs compared to the secrecy at Leonardo Corp!
(You can see some other interesting details here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gvPl3qWZIM)
Dear Andrea,
a pre-midweek edition of my blog:
quite rich.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the QuarkX today?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I'm following, allmost daily, any news about you and your e-cat since your presentazione in Bologna with Focardi in 2011.
Today I saw an article about angular decay anomaly in Be8 generated by bombarding a Li7 target with protons.
Here is the link
I hope it can be usefull to your theorical and experimental research.
Can e-cat quark become a successfull product as soon as possibile.
Best regards,
Dear Andrea,
Are you still on schedule to start your test of the E-Cat QuarkX with your potential customer/partner in June?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Hello Mr. Rossi,
can you provide some information about the current situation of Mr. Penon, the ERV ?
Is his contract for THE TEST done and finished ?
Dear Andrea
In these days I've read some questions from your readers regarding the Quark-X and its ratio for heat to electrical conversion.
If I don't remember bad, in previous posts you was talking about direct electric generation.
Can you clean the field from uncertainties and confirm us that the electric power generated by the Quark-X is generated in a direct way and not by heat conversion ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Dear Dr Rossi:
Another replication from China, that confirms the former replications:
Latest Chinese report translation from Zhang Hang concludes excess heat output 123X more than possible chemical yield
"Test of Abnormal Heat in Hydrogen Loaded Metal – Report 2"
This changing document is being edited and translated by Bob Higgins with answers to questions being added periodically, you can download the most current version from the link below.
The actual COP order of magnitude is stubbornly in line with Optris derived evidence from our recent *GlowStick* 5.3 experiment when accounting for the split heater coil.
Conclusion (at time of writing)
"During this experiment, abnormal exothermic heat production from a fuel of nickel powder plus lithium aluminum hydride was observed for over 80 hours. Within an 80 hour period, the highest excess heat was 205W, and the minimum was 30W. The average temperature of the whole period 1229°C; the average heating power was 700W (including self-consumption of the power supply); and the average production of excess heat was 164W. An average excess heat 164 watts from an average heat input of 700W corresponds to a COP of 1.23. During the longer second round experiment, 47MJ of excess heat was generated. The maximum possible energy yield from chemical reaction of the fuel is calculated to be 0.38MJ; so the measured excess heat energy generated during the second round was more than two orders of magnitude higher. Follow-up work will seek to improve the reaction COP."
Dr Andrea Rossi,
More insults and slanders from the puppets of Darden: how can you ignore them ?
Dear Andrea:
How good has been today the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
did you read that today in china has been again replicated your effect?
Dear Andrea,
Latest from Sifferkoll
Best regards
Hello Mr Rossi,
I just have a question:
Is it possible to generate directly Hydrogen by making thermolysis of the water molecule in the Ecat?
Normaly, thermolysis of water molecule starts when temperature is above 1200°C.
It could be interesting to see if direct hydrogen generation is possible by water fractionning thanks to Ecat high temperature.
A part of the hydrogen generated could be used to automatically refuel the ecat in hydrogen.
Best regards.
Dear Andrea,
Some of your detractors now think that I am just you talking to yourself… I quote:
"Sebastian is yet another fake Rossi user."
"I am always amused by watching Rossi speak to himself through one of his sock puppets!!"
I'm sure they will think this post was also posted by you! I find that quite funny.
Dear Andrea,
This issue of my blog is special in a way:
Forward looking and looking forward,
Dr Rossi
For a beginner that knows nothing of Physics and wants to understand the basics of it, what do you suggest ?
Dr Rossi,
Congratulations on your new Top Level domain acquisition.
Dear Andrea,
Here is a very simple question I wonder if you can answer.
Did you find it easier to trigger massive excess heat utilizing hydrogen from external pressurized cylinders OR utilizing hydrogen from hydrides such as LiAlH4?
My thinking is that with the cylinder you could more precisely and quickly change conditions inside of the reactor.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
The more I read the critics of your foes, the more I am convinced you are going to win in the market and in Court. After a bombastic beginning to attack you, now they have lost all their credibility and I appreciate a lot the fact that you are basically turning a blind eye on them, ignoring most of their comments in your blog and continuing to focus on your great work.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Do you think your system can be useful for the treatment of radioactive waste ?
Warm Regards,
Dear Prof U.V.S.Seshavatharam,
Dear Prof S. Lakshminarayana,
This provides a way of thinking that allows to find an explanation for the thrust of the QuarkX.
I wonder in which models is taken into account the absolute speed of elementary particles in the universe, and what could be the role of the influences caused by differences in speed of these particles.
Sorry if I did not understand the paper. My optional Calculus co-processor was not included when I arrived in this world. So I'm stuck with the older graphics module.
It seems to me that as the LHC can realize more powerfull collisions, then the more and heavier particles are to be found. Maybe the LHC creates these particles, just as a pump can create extra volume in a liquid when it cavitates.
It makes all the calculations and models prevailing in approximately static state are not really valid at high speeds.
Kind Regards,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I am following your work since 2011, when you introduced the E-Cat together with Prof. Sergio Focardi in the University of Bologna. I am really inspired by your huge work, your perseverance and resiliency against any adversity.
Waiting for my E-Cat…
Dear Andrea,
I presume the ERV measured pressure of the vapor that exited the 1MW e-cat?
Dear Andrea,
The latest from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
Digging Deep Into the Dunghill of Dewey Weaver Deceptions and Lies!
Posted on 2016/05/23
Best regards
Dear Andrea,
Given the information that you gave recently (thank you!), it seems to me that power calculation would be very simple.
If the assumptions of political plots are groundless, were you aware of Darden and Vaughn's visits to the White House to meet with the President, White House staffers and Energy Department Officials? See the following URL for meeting details:
Dear Andrea,
Today's blog issue, not merry- is here
Best wishes,
Dear Andrea,
I'm really glad you invented and made the e-cat quark-x, the light it makes and its potential hope must be something beautiful in these times. This is a special gift I think, for all of us someday but especially now for you.
I'm very much looking forward to reading Vessela's book, I hope it is released in English soon.
I pray it works out as the good all hope.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is today out QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea Rossi.
I wanted to follow up on the question I asked a month or so ago regarding the scalability of Quark X 1 MW. You mentioned that it can be scaled, such as half the size, 1/10th the size and so on.
1. Will it produce heat proportional to the scale?
2. Does COP remain constant, independent of the scale? (COP number was thrown around at 20+?)
3. Since you are not ready to give us an answer on the ratio for heat to electrical conversion, can one assume a worse case scenario of 50%?
Kind regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I have a question concerning the cost of electric power. Today the cost for the suppliers to provide their customers with electric power are in the range between 3.8 euro cents up to 21.5 euro cents per KW/h depending on the source (coal, oil, nuclear, renewable etc.). Could you approximately estimate the cost for one KW/h electric power (or provide me with a factor) out of ECAT technology that is produced as autarky local energy, for example in a CHP station in the basement, excluding the investment costs for the purchase of ECAT hardware.
All the best
Uwe Doms
Hello dr . Rossi:
I send you the link of the second edition of the good book of Vessela Nikolova:
"Vessela Nikolova: Dear Readers, it gives me great pleasure to announce the publication of the extended version of my book, 'E-Cat The New Fire – The Biography of Andrea Rossi', which you will find for sale on Amazon, both in digital and paper format, for the moment in Italian, but very soon also in English."
"Scientific truth is not a majority decision" (Galileo Galilei)
Dear Andrea,
I have a hypothesis for where that whole 100.1 degrees C could come from.
Given that the ERV only considered vaporisation for the COP , he used a dummy temperature output value of 100.1C. Possibly he used 99.9C as input temperature. Possibly there is an entire column full of 100.1C in the data. The title of the column is probably "output temperature used for COP calculation". Possibly Penon didn't remove that value from maintenance days.
Most likely there is another column of data with the actual output temperature.
I think some people at IH didn't read the report closely and, instead of reading with an open mind, they looked for discrepancies.
The 100.1C column must have looked a bit weird, but it makes perfect sense to me.
Am I close to the truth?
Dear Mr. Rossi,
If I took 40 ounces of nickel powder (99.999% pure) mixed with 4 ounces of pure lithium powder, heated the mixture to 500 degrees C for two hours, then mixed in 4 ounces of potassium carbonate and two ounces of fine carbon powder, then put the entire mixture into a heavy steel Dewar for two days under complete vacuum, and then added hydrogen gas to the Dewar at two atmospheres, and then added a little heat, would there be a reaction? Is there a critical mass of nickel powder at which reactions are easier to start but more difficult to control? There is a rumor on the Internet of a similar experiment (simpler without my added details) using 40 ounces of nickel and hydrogen gas (without any heat added) that created so much unexplained spontaneous heat that the 300 pound Dewar glowed orange (800C) and the nickel powder melted into a solid mass.
Do you think this is all just an Internet rumor, or could it be possible? The idea that using a larger mass of nickel powder might change the potential for reaction interests me and has some theoretical credibility.
You can email me if you don't want this discussion public.
Sincerely, Christopher Calder
Dear Andrea,
What is your opinion on the governmental system outlined in "The Republic" by Plato?
Faithfully yours
Dear Mr Rossi,
If you read the court documents (your law suite) and your view on IH actions (or lack thereof) you notice that IH' s action often goes hand-in-hand with IH meetings in Washington with policy makers and political advisers (of course this is only the tip of the iceberg as records of emails and phone calls have yet to surfaced).
Mr. Mats Lewan wrote before these record surfaced,.. that there was no sign of political interference in the process.
What do you think??
Dear Andrea,
Can you give us a range of temperature for the super heating without providing exact figures?
For example, was the output steam always at least 110C or higher? 105C or higher?
Dear Andrea,
Are you saying that you were generous and conservative enough to just account for the latent heat of vaporisation as the output energy? And even less an arbitrary 10%?
The enthalpy of vaporization, (symbol ∆Hvap) also known as the (latent) heat of vaporization or heat of evaporation, is the energy (enthalpy) that must be added to the substance, typically a liquid, to transform a quantity of that substance into a gas.
Best regards,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Complimenting what you are doing with the tenacity that distinguishes you and sure that justice will finally triumph, I would like to inform you that it is just available on AMAZON the second updated edition of my book " E-Cat The new Fire – The biography of Andrea Rossi ".
Now it is a paper book and also an E-book for Kindle. For the moment both are only in Italian language.
Here below are the links to the two versions:
Paper book:
I am also preparing the English version, which will be ready soon.
Greetings to you and all the Readers of the JoNPVessela Nikolova
P.S. I made a new post on my blog
Dear Mr Rossi,
I'm sorry. Was just curious of what principles were used. We will wait for later then.
About your answer to Sebastian:
Does this imply that heating was done in stages?
I mean one core was boiling water and the next was superheating the steam from boiler section?
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your response earlier today. It clarifies things a bit.
I do have one more question:
You told Mats Lewan that to be conservative, the ERV ignored the energy corresponding to heating the inflowing cooled water (at about 60˚C) to boiling temperature.
Did the ERV also ignore the energy corresponding to heating the vaporized water to temperatures above boiling point?
Thank you!
Hello Mr Rossi,
most international readers of this blog may not know the details of american law-system. What kind of procedure is it?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
It is very interesting to follow your progress with the QuarkX,along with following the story with IH and the lawsuit. Because LENR can be considered a disruptive technology I am sure it is in the best interest of many to stay aware of all you do. Can you tell us about contacts (if any) you have had with President Obama, Military officials, NASA, Wall street bankers etc..
Bernie Morrissey
Dear Andrea and fellow followers of JONP,
What previous post by Robert Dorr refers to is this article http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/are-industrialheat-and-darden-executing-a-apcowhitehousegs-agenda-to-slow-down-lenr-blackswan-break-through-since-2012/
Dear mr Rossi,
Did you see my question on steam quality?
Was it measured?
Dear Andrea,
trhe Sunday edition, about LENR doors of my blog,
More important than it seems a la prima vista/first sight,
Dear Andrea,
Could you tell us if the output temperature of the 1MW plant was indeed 100.1 degrees C?
This is the value that the IH people have been posting on the forums, so if you could confirm/deny, it would be helpful.
Many thanks!
Hello Mr Rossi,
a few days ago (16th may) Frank Acland asked for some confirmation about the measurents during THE TEST : he asked and you confirmed that fluid flow and deltaT was measured to get the generated heat.
Obviously electric input energy was also measured and logged…
Did you measure fluid pressure at container inlet and at container outlet ? you know – as Shakespeare said: STEAM OR NO STEAM – THAT IS THE QUESTION ! if the customer (JM) REQUIRED HOT WATER, then you must take care to AVOID steam. If the customer REQUIRED STEAM, then you must avoid WATER.
How was that done ?
I was just wondering if you had seen the newly found information that Tom Darden met with President Obama in January 2012 shortly before he contacted you in early 2012?
Thank you for your hard work.
Robert Dorr
Dear Andrea,
There is a very informative and helpful LENR daily newsletter provided by Torkel at http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
which I find highly informative and helpful in looking for up-to-date news for LENR. I would like to bring it to the attention of your readers as I am sure they will find as informative as I do. All you have to do is supply your name and email address.
See also: http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/prime-internet-real-estate-lenr-com-is-now-a-property-of-hydro-fusion/
Things are hotting up !
Best regards
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can we have an update about the F8 ?
Dr Rossi:
your strategy is the best possible: stay away from chatters and focus on the E-Cat in the market. No chatter, no slander will be able to stop your E-Cat, once it will be massively in the market.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Allow me to expand the question. Do you currently believe that the QuarkX technology can competitively be the source of energy to generate commercial electrical power as would be required to either be a source of electrical power for the grid or as a source of electrical power to support local electrical needs (such as appliances, lights, computers. etc.).
If yes, do you believe this would be accomplished through the thermal output, the electrical output or both outputs of the QuarkX technology?
Hello Dr. Rossi: take a look to this latest information about Tom Darden and Cherokee:
Fees, Fees and More Fees:
How Private Equity Abuses Its Limited Partners and U.S. Taxpayers
By Eileen Appelbaum and Rosemary Batt*
May 2016
SEC Enforcement
Despite the mounting evidence of private equity abuses and potentially illegal behavior, SEC enforcement actions have been minimal, with only six actions against PE general partners between 2014 and 2016. In 2014, the SEC targeted two small private equity firms — Lincolnshire Management and Clean Energy Capital — for infractions that were relatively minor. In 2015, KKR paid $30 million to settle an enforcement action for misallocating expenses in failed buyout deals; Blackstone paid $39 million to settle charges of improper fee allocation; Fenway Partners paid modest fines for failing to share fee income with investors; and Cherokee Investment Partners paid minimal fines for inappropriate expense charges. The SEC allowed the PE firms in these cases to pay fines with no admission of guilt.
SEC Enforcement
After Andrew Bowden's shocking "sunshine" speech detailing private equity firms' abuses of fee income, enforcement action was slow to follow — with only six actions brought between the spring of 2014 and 2016. In 2014, the SEC targeted two small private equity firms — Lincolnshire Management and Clean Energy Capital — for infractions that were relatively minor. More serious cases were filed in 2015, when the SEC brought enforcement actions against KKR, three Blackstone Group funds, Fenway Partners, and Cherokee Investment Partners
Also in November 2015, the SEC settled an enforcement action against Cherokee Investment Partners for misallocation of expenses. The SEC charged the small PE firm with inappropriately charging its PE funds for expenses incurred in complying with SEC regulations without disclosing this to the fund's investors. Cherokee Investment Partners neither admitted nor denied the SEC charges, but it reimbursed the funds for the full amount of expenses (a little over $456,000) and paid a fine of $100,000.
37 37 SEC (2015d).
Fees, Fees and More Fees: How Private Equity Abuses Its Limited Partners and U.S. Taxpayers
SEC Enforcement
Despite the mounting evidence of private equity abuses and potentially illegal behavior, SEC enforcement actions have been minimal, with only six actions against PE general partners between 2014 and 2016. In 2014, the SEC targeted two small private equity firms — Lincolnshire Management and Clean Energy Capital — for infractions that were relatively minor. In 2015, KKR paid $30 million to settle an enforcement action for misallocating expenses in failed buyout deals; Blackstone paid $39 million to settle charges of improper fee allocation; Fenway Partners paid modest fines for failing to share fee income with investors; and Cherokee Investment Partners paid minimal fines for inappropriate expense charges. The SEC allowed the PE firms in these cases to pay fines with no admission of guilt.
Dear Dr. Rossi, can we make a rough comparison between a diode (vacuum tube) and the QuarkX?
In both there are anode, cathode and an electric field between the two.
In the diode the electrons are emitted by the incandescent cathode; in QuarkX the electrons are made available by the reaction.
In both so there is an electric current in output. While in diode the output power is (at maximum) equal to the input power (COP = 1), in QuarkX the output power is superior to that input (COP >> 1).
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,
Ego Out Saturday edition Info and LENR in context
A splendid weekend,
Dear Andrea:
I am impressed of the comment yesterday made Mr William Bell ( 7.40 a.m.) after the comment of Woodford.
Very impressed.
Fortunately you have the guts to fight, otherwise thay'd have already buried you.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Uodate of today for the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding your QuarkX development…
If you used this emerging technology to generate heat by boiling a fluid (e.g., water) and running a turbine, the current industrial technology is around 40% efficient (Carnot plus turbine efficiency). That is, for around 2.5W of output thermal energy, 1W of electrical energy is generated.
You have indicated that the QuarkX technology can produce direct electrical energy (plus some thermal energy). If this is correct, then there will still be a conversion efficiency to convert the electrical energy produced into useable electrical energy that can be sent on the grid and/or be used to run appliances, etc. Assuming an average conversion efficiency is say, 85%, the QuarkX must have an electrical generation efficiency of greater than 47% to be economically viable compared to the thermal approach suggested above.
1. Is this analysis correct, given the assumptions stated?
2. Is the electrical conversion efficiency stated above what you believe you can achieve or are you assuming something better?
3. Are there overriding factors beside efficiency that would favor a QuarkX direct electrical mode of electrical power generation?
Dear Andrea:
I loved today the comments of William Bell and of Loris.
At the beginning of this feud I believed that IH was right, because I thought that a so big giant could not be wrong. Now I understand that you are a hard worker that wants to realize his invention, they are dishonest sharks.
I became a follower of yours.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Your answer to Sebastian shows one more time how mendacious is Tom Darden .
You will win, Andrea.
Dear Andrea:
Why you were not able to show to Darden the Customers' area ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I read what the officer of Woodford wrote about the litigation between you and IH in a financial blog. They became now shareholders of IH LTD, so obviously they defend IH, but what is disgusting in that comment is that clearly they used your name and your technology to get enormous money from their investors, visited the 1 MW plant that IH made under your direction, collected further money after their technicians visited the 1 MW plant in operation in the customer's factory and, after collecting all this money from their investors thanks to your work, they deliberately started an action to collect other technologies of the field – that never produced anything- to prepare their investors to the fact that they were going to lose your licence not paying you. Now: since they paid nuts in real cash to buy all that ridiculous "intellectual property" of your competitors, made by revoked patents, useless patent applications, unauthorized patent applications that are copies of your work, etc etc: where is in reality gone the money they got from we investors? From the available information it appears that now the sole asset of IH is a lot of sheres to which has been conferred a value of millions by very, very friendly fair value auditing, but this value is totally fake and such shares are unsellable in the real market, while the real money is disappeared and the license for the sole thing working, which is your E-Cat, is gone. Question: did ever Woodford give you money, or did you ask money from them ?
God bless you for your work and for your fight against the fire you received from your front and from your back.
William Bell
What strongly surprises me is that they made business and gave more than 50 millions to Tom Darden, surely well knowing what is in the following links:
And this bankrupcy, related to EnCap, owned by Cherokee Investment Partners:
Hi Andrea Rossi
Did you ever figured out so far how much could be an "electrical" cop of the quarkx ecat I mean the ratio of electrical output power/electrical input power. Even a general idea would be appreciated.
Kind Regards
Dear Andrea,
It is good to read that you and your team are progressing well on the QuarkX and I hope with you that F8 will be equally to 'excellent'. Good luck with it!
I have some questions that may interest all of you followers:
In reading your blog I've got the impression that you also seem to have made big steps in the theory.
1. Is that due to the test you said you were going to do with professor Cook?
2. Were the results of that test in line with the assumptions?
3. Did you find behaviour that is new and still must be explained?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
Dear dr. Rossi
What do you think about how are going the polls in the USA for the election of the new President of the USA ?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,,
EGO OUT for today, LENR cultural history- a first issue:
All the best,
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for the guts you are fighting with to realize for us the E-Cat.
God bless you,
Dr Andrea Rossi,
When do you think we'll read again a paper from Prof. Cook and you ?
Thank you,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The quarkX will be employed initially for domestic use or for industrial use, with many QuarkX piled up together ?
Dr Rossi:
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
Was there anytime during the 350 – 400 day 1MW reactor test where all 4 of the 250KW Tigers were completely off line at the same time?
Thank you for your hard work.
Dear Andrea:
Today has been published on the JONP a very interesting paper of Prof UVS Seshavatharam and Prof. S. Lakshminarayana of the university of Andra ( India ).
Congratilations to the Journal Of Nuclear Physics for his international reach.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
What have you learned on the fuel lifetime for eCats? It seems they can go longer than 6 months with some additional demands on their control system. Is this correct?
Is there a "poison" generated as the fuel is consumed and that degrades the efficiency or is it merely fuel depletion and geometry effects?
Dear Andrea,
Latest from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mindmap.png
Best regards
Dear Dr. Rossi
Dewey Weaver just admitted on Lenr-Forum that IH's strategy was to hedge their investment from the start. In other words: buy up your competitors and file patents. That shows bad faith. Why would Dewey admit to this?
"Woodford was aware of all possibilities with Rossi early on. The failure by Rossi to keep his side of the agreement was hedged by IH from the onset. Full speed ahead."
Dewey needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that there is a problem here. A very large, blockish, base-minded problem. To end on a more positive note: The confluence of nativism and tribalism in Mr. Dewey Weaver's snow jobs ensures a swirling river of discontent upon which he so peremptorily rides.
Der Andrea,,
my blog today:
all the best,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
you have written at http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=114#comment-1186667
Andrea Rossi
May 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM
IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents.[…]
fyi. the Industrial Heat patent application US2016/0051957A1 with the Pub.Date: Feb.25,2016 is more or less a full plagiarism of the Levi et.al Lugano Report from October 6, 2014.
All the best
Uwe Doms
Smaller cats are more stable cats?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Can we have an update of the QuarkX:
Dear Mr. Rossi,
IH claims that your ECAT shows no COP. Meanwhile they have filed a patent application where you stands as co-inventor on a device that have a COP of 11.
Can you tell us a little bit more about this??
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your courage and perseverance.
You are inspiring.
Dear Andrea,
My blog issue for today under the sign of "dies irae"
But the future will solve the problens,
seen on ECT about implications by Industrial Heat – Interesting
Billy Jackson
.. all that falls apart right when you show they made one themselves … without Rossi's help then filed a patent claiming a COP of 11+ …
of everything they have done or said.. IH has to explain that one more than any other part of the lawsuit.
All the magic and accusations of sleight of hand or fraud, just goes up in smoke when you are taught the magic trick and present it as your own …
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I'm hearing good things about your possible future E-Cat factory in Sweden (Mats Lewan's blog). Any chance that this factory will be powered by E-Cats? This would not be unlike Tesla Motor's Gigafactory being powered by its own solar panels and a great demonstration of the E-Cat!
Peter Metz
Dear Andrea :
Still good the QuarkX ?
Dear mr Rossi,
I am a litle surprised that you needed no HVAC system in the e-cat container producing 1MW heat. If you only lost 1% of this inside the container, it still meant 10KW heating,…
1. I Expect the container itself where not insulated? and therefore transferring effectively the lost heat to the outside surroundings.
2. Did you have closed doors of the e-cat container during running?
Dear Dr Rossi:
The Clown says you pasted the data of the report and confused them. He says you put 100.1 °C also when the plant was shut down.
Do you think is worth to answer ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Please, stop talking of this damn litigation, let's return to talk of science, technology and our beloved E-Cat !!!
Dear Andrea,
How can 10KWh be a lot, But 10KWh be so little?
This sounds contradictory.
Take a coffee brake Andrea, I got this one.
10KWh at $0.001 per KWh is insignificant.
10KWh at $3.00 per KWh is a LOT.
Quarky, I mean quirky regards
Dan C.
Dr. Rossi: Thank you for the recent information you have provided on this site and for giving the Mats Lewan interview, both very positive and informative. I was wondering if you have received back the reports on the isotopic tests of the ash from the year long test. Could you tell us if they are consistent with the Lugano test?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is the reason the control system is separate from the pen-sized reactor is due to the extreme temperatures the reactor produces or for other reasons?
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the ERV report:
1. I have read rumors of the ERV report stating that steam output was constantly 100.1 C throughout the test, even when the plant was shut down — is this accurate? If not, can you say what the average temperature of the steam was?
2. Was there any difference between the measurements by your own instruments and the ERV's instruments of steam output?
Thank you if you can answer,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
The blog issue for today can be found here:
all the best and +
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the very clear explication you gave to Oystein
This may be of interest to you "Physicists discover a new form of light": http://phys.org/news/2016-05-physicists.html
Warm regards from Spain
Dear Andrea
I read with great interest the article published by Mats Lewan regarding your visit to Sweden and your report of some of the details of the 1 year E-Cat test. I wonder if you could clarify a couple of points:
1. From what I have read the customer's work took place inside a sealed enclosure, maybe a shipping container also?
2. Was the customer's production facility positioned next to the plant in the same building?
3. Mats wrote that "IH never had access to the customer's area", however you mentioned yesterday that Tom Darden and his investors spoke with the customer in his factory. Can you explain what Mats meant?
4. Did you buy the building you looked at in Sweden for your factory?
5. Mats said the 100 W QuarkX is the size of a pen — does each QuarkX include its own control system built in, or is that separate?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Update about the QuarkX ?
Dear mr. Rossi,
You say you had 3KW HVAC coolest for the computer container.
1. This is not the same as e-cat container?
2. How much HVAC cooling did you supply to inside E-cat container to keep it at working conditions…?
"Dear Dr Rossi:
Maybe your readers are interested, to better understand who Tom Darden and Mr Weaver are, to read carefully the following links:
The Pennsauken project
The two bankruptcies in Feb 2016
EnCap (Owned by Cherokee Investment Partners) bankruptcy in 2008
These gentlemen are not very credible , the readers will understand.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the attributes with which you are dealing with enemies one thousand folds stronger and powerful than you. For us it is fun to watch this sort of movie, but I understand for you it is hard to sustain all this and at the same time to continue to work on your E-Cat.
Thank you for all you are doing,
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Questions, if you can answer:
1- before the beginning of the test did Tom Darden meet the president of the Customer (JM) ?
2- did he know that the president of JM, the Customer, was also your attorney ?
3- if yes, did he sign a contract with JM after knowing what in points 1 and 2 ?
4- when he accompanied his investors to visit the plant of the Customer, did Tom Darden and his investors speak with the Customer in his factory ?
5- during these visits did he say anything negative to you and to his investors, or he only said positive things ?
6- is it true that Tom Darden collected substantial amounts of money from the investors after their visit to the plant to the Customer ?
7- at the time Darden made the visits to the plant in the factory of the Customer, had he already received from the ERV the first quarter report ?
8 if yes, were the results of the report with the data of the first quarter moreless equal to the results of the final report ?
Thank you for your answers,
Caro Andrea,
Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to Mats Lewan during your important visit to Sweden.
His blog post about your meeting is well written and very revealing.
Mats is like an escrow of trust in our community. I hope you can keep him in the loop as much as you can and let him attend some important events even if under NDA.
Just focus on the quark-x.
Thank you and best regards,
Dear mr. Rossi,
what size of HVAC system did you use to keep the working conditions cool inside the 1MW container?
I assume a few percent of the 1MW was lost as heat inside the container, which you would need to remove.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am so glad you are continuing your work, turning a blind eye to the other problems. With you we will have the LENR.
Take care of yourself.
Hi Rossi
This new technology should sound like something from the Star Trek universe. I think Quark Cell is a fitting name.
I can hear Picard ask for some more Quark cells when he needs to refuel the hyperdrive.
Thanks for considering Sweden for your new factory, it would be such an honor to have the first Quark cell factory on Swedish land.
Greetings from northern Sweden, Hampus Ericsson
Dear Andrea,
According to the contract published in the court documents, this is the way that the ERV was to perform the measurements in the Validation test: "To make this measurement the ERV will measure the flow of the heated fluid and the Delta T between the temperature of the fluid before and after the E-Cat reaction".
Is this the measurement system used in the ERV report?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
One comment about the British 1956 patent mentioned by Greg Leonard. It uses O16, P31, Co59, Cd112 (O16 is not mentioned, but it's there). What is common to these isotopes? They all have a number of neutrons which is a power of two: 8,16,32,64. The same holds for He4 (2), Li7 (4), Ni60 (32) and Pd110 (64). Such power-of-two neutron isotopes are rather rare, there are only a few others, namely N15 (8), Si30 (16), S32 (16), Fe58 (32), In113 (64), Sn114 (64). Some of these are very minor isotopes while some are common, like S32 which is 96% of natural sulfur.
That said, I don't know of any theoretical reason why a power of two neutron number would imply anything special in a nucleus.
regards, /pekka
Dear Dr Rossi:
Can you explain if the 1 MW plant that has made the 1 year long test is still in operation ? If not: can you explain why ? There are many different rumers around .
I gave the wrong 'best' link. It should have been
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Do you confirm that with the QuarkX you can theoretically have a density of power of 1 MW/100 liters of volume ?
Dear Andrea,
Isn't renting/leasing a factory building a better option than buying for your business' cash flow?
Hello dr . Rossi, I am sending two important links that I suggest to the readers.
Rossi makes offer on Swedish factory building – plus more updates
#LENR #ECAT Saga: Jed Rothwell Showing Infinite Lack of Judgment Skill!
Dear Andrea
A Monday edition of my blog:
All my best wishes,
Andrea Rossi,
I must apologize. You correctly said 10 W/cc, not 100 W/cc.
Apologetic regards,
Joseph Fine
Andrea Rossi, Sheba Malacara, Jaroslaw Bem:
I accidentally opened up a "can of cubic centimeters or milliliters".
See "Can of Worms: http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/can+of+worms
One milliliter (mL) is equivalent to 1 cubic centimeter.
So, 10 W/mL is equivalent to 10,000 W/Liter. (My answer…)
And, 10 kW/L = 1000 kW/100 Liters (That is, 1 MW/100 L)
100 W/cc, on the other hand, is 100 kW/Liter, or 10 MW/100 Liters.
So, at the risk of being wrong, the answer should be 10 W/cc or 10 W/mL.
Thank you for making me think about this.
I hope I have clarified this to you.
But how did you reduce the volume to 100 Liters?!! (y) (y)
Joseph Fine
Dear AR,
I assume the 'very important event' relates to your June test.
I hope your preparations are going well.
A second issue: what do you think of this 1956 British patent which claims to get 1kW electric output from a mixture of Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt when subject to magnetic and RF stimulation,
Best link is
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for your fantastic work and your courage,
Dear Andrea Rossi:
The more IH pays puppets, the more you gain followers after the blatant falsity of their statements. They are spending their money to your advantage.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Still good our QuarkX ?
Am I right in assuming that it is essential for the Leonardo Corporation to the upcoming trial really goes to the "bottom" of this civil suit . It is so important that it does not matter how long the trial will be. Gladly few extra months just to get a good job done ….
Warm regards "Jag bara undrar?"
Dear mr Rossi,
Will a public demonstration serve any good? I'm thinking it's better to focus on getting it ready for the market:
I think there may be two outcomes of a public test:
1. Any advanced enough (like Alien 😉 ) technology will always be considered magic. If QuarkX is the real thing, the technology is far ahead of everyone. And any public demonstration of QuarkX will therefore be percieved as a magic trick.
2. Sceptics: Rossi is pulling a practical joke on all of us. And his public demonstration will therefore be concluded a Nice magic trick.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Today, Sunday, did you work with the QuarkX ? We know you on Sunday play tennis with your wife, but do you also have an update of our QuaekX ?
Dr. Rossi,
I look forward each day to reading your comments. You are an inspiring person.
I have been following your work since 2011 and I am dismayed by how you have been treated by IH.
Does IH have a date by which to respond to your law-suite? Do you have any idea of when the trial will begin?
Thank you for taking the time from a busy schedule to let us know what is happening in your life.
— Sam
>As everyone knows,
classic absolutely generic assertion tending to let people think that it is true. But this assertion isn't valid, it's a fake and hasn't the minimum credibility!
Dear Andrea,
A Sunday issue of my blog pacifist:
The most instructive is at the end- cobra managemenT
Best wishes,
Dear Andrea,
Please see the latest excellent article from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/lenr-ecat-saga-jed-rothwell-showing-infinite-lack-of-judgment-skill/#comment-27787
Best regards
I'm tired of the mud slinging, the fog machine, the missinformation, the misdirection and school playground manipulation. Honestly it's like being 14 again. And I feel like that just as an observer. I can only begin to imagine how you must feel. I try to be open minded and I know I am ignorant of many things but I have not forgotten the detailed posts you have made this past year and seen there how they slowly developed and your confidence with the plant grew through careful care. After seeing all this mud and the direction it comes from I understand you more than before though and I am clear where the truth lies. A few weeks or a month of mud can't undo what you have achieved. I hope you get your chance for justice and the due apologies you deserve and most of all I hope are able to continue peacefully your work with e-cat.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the 1-year 1MW E-Cat test:
1. Is production data from the E-Cat customer recorded ?
1-bis. if yes, is it available to you?
2. If so, does the production data harmonize with the ERV report that apparently states that circa 1MW of steam was produced by the plant for the duration the test?
3. Are the electricity bills paid by the customer retained, and are they available to you?
4. If so, do these electricity bills harmonize with the data from the ERV report that (according to court documents) the plant operated at a COP of over 50 for the duration of the test?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
2016 IH patent application is basically a copy of 2014 Ecat Lugano report. Note image 18D showing claimed COP > 3.6.
So IH now claim no excess heat from the reactor they designed, manufactured & had tested by the Lugano team, yet claimed excess heat in their patent application.
Bit strange that.
Dear Sheba Malacara Joseph Fine
As Dr Rossi said (May 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM) he gain the power density in Quark X = 10 W/cL, then theoretical extrapolation of that power density to the power 1 MW gives volume of 1000 L. (one thousand Liters). Of course not counting the volume of the heat exchanger.
Best regards,
Jaroslaw B.
interesting post on EgoOut:
Felix Rends
"This is about calorimetry. As everyone knows, Rossi did bad calorimetry in previous tests."
I am very curious, I understand that it is even for specialists difficult to make an exact calorimetry on a single test devices in a laboratory, but is it really possible to incorrectly analyze a COP greater 50 using calorimetry on a device that (claimed) is producing 1MW/h thermal heat and is running 352 days in mostly self sustain mode?
And if yes, could you please explain to me how do you think could such an incorrect measurement occur, is it a fundamental error out of unintentional ignorance and lack of professionalism, or are the data simply manipulated or falsified. So my question is, can someone incorrectly 'measure' a COP 50 on a device running 352 days in self sustain mode and how?"
I like to add: can a team of paid puppets of Tom Darden, unable to make basic mathematics, continue to insult a nuclear engineer, expert of nuclear power plants, expert certificator, to be unable to measure a COP of a very small ( respect a nuclear power plant ) steam generator in 352 days of test of a plant working 24/7 ? How much are the chances that a bunch of semi-analphabete puppets can teach him to make a calorimetric measurement ? By the way: I made a search and in all the life of Dr Penon, the ERV, there has been not a silgle flaw related to his profession and his honesty. His professional record is immaculate.
Dear Andrea Rossi, Sheba Malacara,
Since 1 MW per 100 L is 10 kW/Liter, (or 10^4 W/L)
The equivalent for 10 Watts should be 10 W/milliliter or 100 W/centiliter.
Of course, I make mistakes too. Once I thought I made a mistake, but I was wrong.
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
Do you think the hot fusion has a future ?
Thank you,
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Did I understand well that you want to produce only one very small module in massive quantity to allow to pile it up to any limit of desired power ?
Dear Andrea,
My blog today
An other smallish issue grafted on a nasty, big quarrel
Dear Dr Rossi:
1 Did the Customer use all the heat produced by the 1 MW plant during the one year test ?
2 Did he have sometime the necessity to dump excess of heat ?
3 If yes, was there a heat dissipation system ?
Thank you,
With the new QuarkX eCat being developed, would you consider the professionals at Lugano evaluating its performance?
Caro Andrea Rossi
Saluti dall'Italia! (quella sana)
Ho creato un gruppo su FB che conta quasi 500 sostenitori.
Cerco di tenere sempre aggiornata la pagina con le notizie che riesco a reperire.
Purtroppo in Italia credo ci sia una vera e propria censura, quindi sono costretto a navigare su siti di tutto il mondo (che disgrazia).
Conosco Salvo Mandarà e aspetto con gioia che Lei conceda un'altra intervista dandoci belle notizie.
Volevo solo chiederle di indicarmi se ci sono altre fonti accreditate dove posso seguire i suoi sviluppi o se mi consiglia di seguire solamente questo forum.
Giovanni Caruso
Dear Andrea Rossi,
About the QuarkX Cat: do you confirm that in a volume of 100 liters you can put a power of 1 MW ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the E- Cat QuarkX today ?
Hi, Dr Rossi:
Find here a link to the report of the US Navy expert Louis F. DeChiaro , Ph.D. : he has published the C.O.P. the 23/09/2016:
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) Phenomena and Potential Applications
Louis F. DeChiaro, Ph.D.
September 23, 2015
Rossi 1 Megawatt LENR Plant
Original version ~100 10 kW. Ecats in std. 20 ft. ship container.
More recent version uses 4 250 kW reactors.
Completed >200 days of 400 day test @ US customer factory.
Heat is now being used by customer for mfg. operations.
Performance report expected around Feb-Mar., 2016.
C.O.P. (Pout /Pin) typically varies between 20 and 80.
Andrea Rossi,
LHC beam energy:
A lot of kinetic energy here…..
Lead-ion collisions: the LHC achieves a new energy record
After the Bevatron (Berkeley, 1954) – which broke the energy barrier of billions of electronvolts – and the Tevatron (Fermilab, 1987) – which reached a trillion electronvolts – the LHC is now reaching the peta- (quadrillion) electronvolt level with its heavy-ion collisions (see here). However, one should remember that the average energy per colliding nucleon pair, within the 1 PeV "fireball", is 5 TeV (compared to 13 TeV in the recent proton-proton collisions).
In this year's one-month run, the first week was devoted to colliding protons at 2.51 TeV per beam to provide reference data for the subsequent collisions of lead nuclei (the atomic number of lead is Z=82, compared to Z=1 for protons) at the unprecedented energy of 5.02 TeV in the centre of mass per nucleon.
And, anyway ("de toute facon"):
"Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come."
"Rien n'est plus fort qu'une idée dont l'heure est venue."
– Victor Hugo
Powerful regards,
Joseph Fine
Andrea Rossi, Inge Warnken,
Here is information on the LHC experiments that show an excess of photon pairs that may indicate a new particle.
( See link to the 750 GeV 'bump'.
Supersymmetric regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
A very interesting article by http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/lenr-ecat-saga-the-weaver-confirms-main-issue-is-ip-transfer-not-the-cop50-1mw-test/
posted 13/5/2016.
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The LHC of CERN has found a new elementary particle at energies around 750 GeV. This is a particle that was not supposed to exist and couls revolutionize the Standard Model.
Do you have an opinion about this?
Dr Andrea Rossi
Some blogs are populated by persons that, even id they do not have any specific professional qualification, want to explain how calorimetry must be done. I find this ridiculous.
What do you think ?
Dear Andrea,
will June presentation focus on the thermal energy production capability of QuarkX, on its electric capability or both of them?
Before the greetings I've just a request.
Please Andrea give us a few crumbs of news. We were waiting for more than a year the results of the previous long test, the knowing of which was repeatedly postponed and now we know that they probably cannot be disclosed until years.
In June you will present the QuarkX but in a closed doors conference. Ma uffa. Am I remembering bad or you were talking about a public presentation of QuarkX in June ?
Also in the last weeks it looks like your secrecy is further increasing.
Please understand our feelings and my request. We love ECat almost like you do, and we suffer for not being able to give even a slightest peek.
Obviously this is not intended to be a criticism against you. We all understand the hard and dangerous situation you are involved in and, as always, we are with you.
God bless you
Marco Serra
Mr. Rossi,
Comparisons to PWR Nuclear Plant:
1100MW reactor has 18 million pellets,1cm dia x 1cm long,
In 50,000 tubes in 193 assemblies to produce heat for 18 months.
They replace1/3 assemblies after 18 months. Obviously diff designs vary but point is, your small QuarkX at 100w would take only 11,000 for a MW.
Small things add up
God Speed
Dear Andrea,
Todsy EGO OUT issue a bit shorter than usual:
Inter alia, well written Russian paper about replications everywhere.
All the best,
Dr. Rossi, Google:
Click on:
Engineers develop cement with 97% smaller carbon dioxide.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
Dear Andrea,
Assuming positive results from the non-public partner/customer presentation and test, will an E-Cat QX press announcement be made soon afterwards? Will it be possible, if customer permits, comments or data be provided from the test? Like the weatherman, what percentage chance would you give that an announcement will be made in June? Will the winds be strong?
With much regained respect,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think about the possibility to use the industrial E-Cats to produce heat in cement production plants ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain a little more about what is involved in the preliminary R&D period of the E-Cat QuarkX?
Will it be over before the important test with the potential customer/partner in June?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think the "important presentation" to your new partner will be made within this year ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Dear Mr Rossi,
You have always pointed out that pricing will be a cornerstone of your market policy. Basically so cheap that no competition can/wants to enter the LENR market.
If you manufacturer 1.000.000 units next year and from there you double the production capacity every year. You will reach something like 500.000.000 units (output) after 10 years?? ..a breath taking growth.
However, considering that the LENR market will be far larger,… is your pricing policy effective? Seems that as long as you can not supply enough with LENR products there will always be room for more expensive LENR products.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The usual puppets of Cherokee Partners are writing that it is impossible you make 1 MWh/h in the factory of your customer because the factory is too small. As always do they who lie, they do not add the numbers. If they do not know the dimensions of the plant of the customer, nor what it does, nor how it works, nor know is the dumping system in case of excess of heat, how can they say this ?
Godspeed, Andrea: if IH and Cherokee Partners have to disseminate these clowneries, you already won the litigation.
Beware, though: their corruptive apparatus has been well illustrated in the blog of David Nygren.
Dear Andrea,
I hope this is outside the area which you cannot talk about with the litigation.
There has been a discussion by some people on an enemy blog that the factory in which you performed the year long test is not large enough to house the equipment that would need 1MW of steam. Is it possible to explain (i think it has already been mentioned what the factory produced) what type of equipment was in place and how it used the steam?
It's tiring to read all the negative feedback and sometimes it's nice to be able to throw some mud back
Dear Andrea,,
This is EGO OUT's issue for today:
Best wishes,
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
You write that the private demonstration of the QuarkX in june will be with the production of heat.
Can you write something about the direct production of electricity and about the SSM of the QuarkX ? Mainly if the basic principles are the same of the SSM in the 1MW container version.
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
Great news, not so great discussion
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the attention you captured from the Army of the USA. Who do you think could be the best President for the LENR ?
Hello, Andrea
are you preparing new patents for the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The links to the Congress and the Army are clearly inspired by your work, the sole that can merit the attribution of a leadership.
The LENR world owes you this immense upgrading of interest in the highest echelons of the USA.
Dear Dr Rossi:
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea
as I understood the 1Mw plant is a ready product, why you don't want to make public presentation of it now?
Dear Andrea,
The latest article from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
#LENR #ECAT @ApcoWorldwide Saga: about the usual puppets: " Transforming Into a Primary IH Spinner or Simply Lost in Emotions?"
Best regards
Dear Dr. Rossi, what do you think about the following document, as the US Government is strongly entering in the field of LENR in general and in yours in particular ?
Will it be a brake to its diffusion?
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Hello Dott. Rossi:
Please find here a link with an important military doument from the USA:
"The committee is aware of recent positive developments in developing low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), which produce ultra- clean, low-cost renewable energy that have strong national security implications. For example, according to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), if LENR works it will be a ''disruptive technology that could revolutionize energy production and storage.'' The committee is also aware of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency's (DARPA) findings that other countries including China and India are moving forward with LENR programs of their own and that Japan has actually created its own investment fund to promote such technology. DIA has also assessed that Japan and Italy are leaders in the field and that Russia, China, Israel, and India are now devoting significant resources to LENR development. To better understand the national security implications of these de- velopments, the committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing on the military utility of recent U.S. industrial base LENR advancements to the House Committee on Armed Services by September 22, 2016. This briefing should examine the current state of research in the United States, how that compares to work being done internationally, and an assessment of the type of military applications where this technology could potentially be useful."
Dear Andrea,
in a previous comments you said that in June will be held the pubblic presentation of the Quarck-X. Will June 3 be a good day?
It will be a good present for your birthday but, also a present you make for all mankind.
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Dr. Rossi:
How is working today the QuarkX:
Dr. Rossi: Could you tell us how many 100-120C, similar to the yearlong test E-Cats, you have sold to date and are there more orders than you are able to fill?
Dear Andrea,
Tuesday- Martedi day of MARS its spirit is manifest in this issue of my Blog:
All the best- for the good people!
I am encouraged that the domestic ecats are soon to be certified. Will it be months or years from certification to installation of first domestic ecat and will it only be available in the the United States or also in other Countries as well? Particularly in the frigid north country of Canada !
Dear James,
If we are speaking about, for example, PUREX process (Plutonium-Uranium Recovery by EXtraction), the proposed system can be used for treatment of low-level and medium level radioactive solutions, which were formed while this process. However, for the treatment of the high-level radioactive waste containing fissile elements, actinides and transuranium elements, it is not appropriate due to the specific requirements for the treatment of such waste.
Best regards,
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Andrea Rossi,
Can you tell use something of the eCat Quark in terms of its size, weight, effective COP, and electrical power output? I am wondering whether it might have application in medium to large UAV applications.
Dear Andrea,
Yesterday you said your ballpark goal for the cost of the QuarkX was $0.2-$1 per Watt. Is this thermal or electrical W?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Related to your (recent, long) answer to Joseph Fine, I'm wondering if one can see from the recorded 1-year data somehow when the normal plant operator is switched to the "abnormal" one and vice versa? If not, maybe Fourier-transforming the data would help make them visible.
Curious regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea,
I would like to propose an issue that affects me particularly that perhaps you have already answered in previous years but which is always current, seen the remarkable progress achieved by the QuarkX.
The impact on the lives of all of QuarkX days will be sensational. How can the common man, became aware of "Rossi" effect, continue to look at things from all impartially days?
Trivial examples:
I have to buy a new machine that will last the next 10 years. I buy an electric car, a hybrid or diesel?
I would install a photovoltaic system of 20 KW ….. it still makes sense?
I would change the boiler house because she begins to wobble, what do I do?
Andrea Rossi
9 Maggio 2016 alle 21:09
Dan: assolutamente sbagliato. L'E-Cat, dopo il test di successo di un anno nella fabbrica del cliente è stato di fondamentale importanza e rimane l'unico vero e proprio prodotto che abbiamo ora in vendita. Con Affetto, AR
Andrea Rossi
May 9, 2016 at 9:09 PM
Dan: Absolutely wrong. The E-Cat, after the successful test of one year in the factory of the Customer has been of paramount importance and it remains the sole real product we have now for sale. Warm Regards, A.R.
Queste sono le tue parole del 09 Maggio 2016 . Ora essendo io uno tra i primi in lista per l'acquisizione di almeno 6 E-Cat da molti anni , Ti prego di spedirmi oppure vengo io a prenderlo al : " 1331 LINCOLN ROAD S,te 601 MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA 33139 USA " Il nominativo dell' acquirente , nel caso debba essere un americano è mia prima cugina , vera americana sposata con un americano e vivono a CHICAGO . Ed il Tuo E-CAT sarà portato a CHICAGO USA .
Tuo Giannino Lodovico Ferro Casagrande di Udin
Dear Dr Andrea,
Please trash my last question, I realise now, it was my mistake. The question was about the cost of the machine? ("power" not "Energy").
I'm very happy!
Many thanks.
Dear Dr Rossi,
When you said ballpark Quark electricity cost: 20 to 100 $/kWhr did you mean /MWhr?
Interestingly, Solar bids are currently down at $58/MWhr and predicting $20.
Best wishes
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The development of the QuarkX means that yu consider the E-Cat obsolete ? Somebody is saying so.
Thank you for the answer,
Dr Andrea Rossi:
It appears that Me356 has replicated the effect described in your US patent. Comments?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Me 346 of MFMP has replicated your effect in full, reaching COP 3.
What do you think ?
Dear Andrea,
This is my blog issue for today:
Paper by Frank Acland has an essential subject.
Dear Mr Rossi,
You are probably well informed about the many, largely successful,.. replications attempt of your eCat. Some of them claims that they records bursts or lasting radiations.
Your enemies will of course point on these replication attempts and claim that the business needs to be regulated. The first regulations is often a total (LENR) ban. They can't pick you but by pointing on reckless amateurs work they may gain some acceptance for LENR regulations.
Is that a problem for you??
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
Dear Dr. Rossi
I would be pleased to know something about the 1-year report of the e-cat tested so far. May be I have lost some episodes.. please repeat in case.
Best regards.
Andrea Rossi,
Using a stethoscope, how can listening to the sounds or changes of sounds from an operating plant provide the operator enough time to modify plant characteristics and prevent serious transients or catastrophic damage?
In the case of a required intervention, operator response time would be on the order of several seconds (you might be much faster than most of us) while automatic responses would be on the order of milliseconds.
(You not only have to respond, but you also must take the correct action! )
Serious power transients could develop in milliseconds or microseconds.
As a consequence, is operator intervention possible, or prohibited, when the plant is in steady state mode SSM?
Or, is manual intervention used only when external power sources are active, which prevents rapid power transients?
Are you listening to sounds from the coolant system, so you know when the coolant is boiling?
Isn't that too late to recover from a power transient?
Sound & harmonic regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Any news about your theoretical work with Prof. Norman Cook ?
Mr Rossi,
From the documents that have been published it appears that Tom Darden is a customary fraudster since 15 years. Besides, the fact that IH had the reports of the ERV after 3 months from the beginning of the test, with the same results of the final report and used this preliminary report to collect money instead of criticizing it immediately speaks very loudly in your favour.
What is youe target of price per kW of power for the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
Are you still working on the safety certification for the domestic QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you presently working in the USA or in Europe ?
Andrea there is a lot of talk around ME356 & MFMP detecting neutron fluxes in their experiments at times! ME 356 seems to have best understanding of LENR power generating methods! Both have reservation about exposure to neutrons, please be careful in your work! Please review ME 356 part 2 blog on LENR forum to analyze their troublesome developments in light of your knowledge! You might want to pass on some of your cautions in that area! ME 356 is one of my favorite experimenters after you of course! I would not want to see him or others endanger themselves as I know you would not also!
Your friend & ally Jim
PS on another subject look at F.B post on "Dark Money" by Jane Mayer & Oil Oliagarch in our country! They don't seem to be nice on new energy people! Again Be Aware!
Dear Andrea,
Please allow me a brief look into the future – do you think that :
1/ for automobile/ship applications we should still be interested
a) in steam machines (for direct power) or
b) turbines for electricity production, or
c) will Ecatx/quark be sufficiently efficient as to deliver the electrons directly :
c1: via buffer battery?
c2: direct (ecat reaction speeds controllable like explosion engine)
2/ for airplanes applications ecat technology could be applied :
a) indirectly: through production of hydrogen/ artificial natural gas produced with ecat heat
b) directly :
b1: through turbines driven by ecat heat
b2: and/or through ecat generated electricity (vertical take off and landing and horizontal motion
Anticipatory regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If you are considering a demonstration program, I would suggest using an existing car design such as the Chevy Volt. I own one and it is wonderfully designed, automatically switching from battery to gasoline when the battery is sufficiently depleted when operating in the Normal mode. When in the Mountain mode of operation, the gasoline generator runs and operates the Chevy Volt but also charges the battery.
If an auxiliary eCat unit could be implemented on the outside of the Chevy Volt such that it provided the electrical power that the gasoline powered generator would normally provide when the gasoline engine was engaged, you theoretically could run the car continuously for the lifetime of the charge. By mounting the eCat unit externally, although unattractive, it would be cooled by the air flow of the car's movement/wind.
I would think General Motors is a sufficiently large company that they could secretly perform an experimental program to test and to validate the eCat concept.
Practical considerations are whether charging should be done when stationary (heat build-up of the eCat unit), turn-on time , if more than a few minutes. Even at maximum speed (100 mph), the fully charged Chevy Volt battery has at least 15 minutes of run time. Hopefully, the eCat could be running within that time period. Post-operation charging rate should probably be around 2 hours to keep heat build-up reasonable.
What better way to demonstrate LENR then to drive continuously across the USA without refueling?
Dr Andrea Rossi
I appreciate your policy to focus on the product and ignore the chatters.
Dear Andrea,
Does the QuarkX run 24/7 now? If so, do you ever leave QuarkX running when it is unattended by yourself or other people?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Some of your readers have exposed the crookery and clownery of the people at IH.
Good news: Now you look very good when compared to them. You are effortlessly funny, without being clownish, with your inimitably "bad" English -:) The infidels on some blogs keep analyzing your bad English for clues.
Bad news: The haters will question your judgment in picking such bad people as your business partners. Is there any reason that you did not partner with great philanthropists like Bill Gates or the Google guys?
Wish you good luck with your Quark-X. Do you realize that you are running out of names for your future improvements. So hurry up and let the cat out of the bag.
Warm Regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Today, Sunday, are you working on the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
A Sunday edition but not festive of my blog
Best wishes,
Dr Irina Uzikova & Dr Uzikov:
Could be your system useful also for high level radioactive wastes, e.g. spent nuclear fuel ?
Andrea Rossi:
How is gon today the QuarkX ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are there fundamental differences between the QuarkX and the E-Cat ?
Dear Dr Rossi,
Your upcoming work in Europe had me wondering…
From a practical, or legal, standpoint, while the lawsuit is pending, are you allowed to:
1) sell E-Cat units to US companies?
2) work R&D-wise with US companies?
Thanks, WaltC
Dear Andrea,
I fully understand that you can´t answer the detailded questions i my last post. When I come to think of it many design features are also patentable: how to control multiple quarks simultanously, how to put them together in an optimal way for heat exchange and for exchangeability and so on.
Looking forward to see the pictures of the Quark X. Maybe it is possible to publish a photo of one of the earliest prototypes so you dont reveal the latest design features?
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Will the preliminar demonstration only show products 100% from Leonardo? Or will it be products (driven by Quark X) from other partners? What i mean is that Leornado do the Cat/cats and other partner do there products and you put it together for demonstration? Warm regards "Jag bara undrar+"
Dear Andrea,
Here is my blog issue for today:
Thank you for help
Caro Andrea Rossi:
You are right: it is useless to make other public tests before a product is ready. The complaints of the pathoskeptics will never end until a product massively distributed will close the door to any puppet paid to attack whatever you make, like, for example, the pseudo- scientist "Dr Pffft", as you dubbed him.
Just make a product for us and forget the chatters .
Dear Mr. Rossi,
in a former answer you said, that in the ecat QX you use titanium. I have several questions:
1. Do you replace nickel with titanium, or do you use both?
2. We know, that the nickel isotopes transmute to ni62. Did you observe titanium transmutations, too?
3. Is titanium essential for the direct production of electricity?
As always, thank you for your answers.
Best regards,
Dear Andrea,
As I understand there is also a safety aspect of the Quark X being so small.
When the exact manufacturing size has been decided then you must find out how to put the quarks together parallel in clusters. If you go with an exchange system I guess it is easier for the customer/service organisation to exchange the different sized clusters ( a few standard configurations I suppose) than the individual Quarks.
I also suppose that the ratio (Electric output)/(Heat output) decides if the cluster is air cooled or water cooled. Maybe a water cooled system increases safety?
a) Are you still working with how many quarks there should be in one cluster (optimizing control loops for multiple quarks)?
b) Have some of your team members started to design smart exchangable clusters yet?
c) Will your first official multiple Quark X unit be water cooled?
Many of your blog readers are very impatient to see some e-cat products and you are often answering that a lot of work first has to be done. I realize that when you are coming close to production, several thousand questions/items have to be solved that are manufacturing related, but as I understand you and your team are working hard on the different items.
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Dear Mr. Rossi
You answered to one of the questions posed to you that Quark X will produce 1 MW of thermal energy. What would be a conversion ratio from thermal to electric, assuming you will be selling the Quark X for electric energy applications?
Kind regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You mentioned that the first demonstration will be to your "partners." Are you referring to Hydrofusion and perhaps ABB (manufacturing partner), or are there even more?
Thank you and I hope you and your team's hard work pays off!
Peter Metz
Dear Andrea,
Let me describe how I think you will demonstrate the QuarkX:
You will sit on a platform high in the air. The platform is held in the air by five QuarkX jets and you are hovering above an enormous crowd, all staring at the platform. At the bottom of the platform is attached a flatscreen, faced to the crowd and showing life your smiling face. In between the five jets are attached five big loudspeakers. You will speak and your voice thunders over the crowd: 'See I told you, the E-cat works!' But they still do not believe you. A trembling voice yells: 'The batteries will be empty soon, the thing will drop!!' The crowd panics and tries to escape from the area under the platform. After two, three, four hours, you are still there, high in the air, still smiling and perhaps singing a song like 'It's in the air…'. Then the first gets a pain in the neck and bows his head, soon many follow, tired of looking at you on the platform and all bowing the head deep to release the pain and they mumble: 'He is right, it obviously works'. When no one looks anymore you will fly to another place and another crowd and do the same, and the same, and the same. And then, finally the world is convinced. Amen. 😉
Hi Andrea
If the ecat x will be demonstrating SSM live over the internet for the public audiences, will there be facility for sending in questions live online during the demo?
Thanks for answering
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Also, one more small request:
Can you provide a photograph of some part of your facility and team, or the QuarkX, just your fans can have some idea of what the conditions of your work are like?
Warm regards,
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Regarding commercial demonstration of the QuarkX:
1. When do you expect to make the demonstration?
2. Can you give probability for demonstration time frames? (e.g. demo within 6 months = x%, demo within 12 months = y%, etc.)
3. Will either the ECat or QuarkX be available for sale before the demonstration? (I am ready to purchase!).
With all support and warm regards,
Dear Andrea,
You can imagine that many followers of the E-Cat are interested in the idea of a public demonstration of the E-Cat QuarkX. A few questions on the matter, if I may:
1. Will the public demonstration be held only if the R&D on course is successful, and the factory is ready to produce E-Cat QuarkX reactors?
2. Will it be a scientific presentation, or a commercial presentation?
3. Will it be broadcast live over the Internet?
4. Will it be minutes, hours or days long?
5. Will it show the E-Cat QuarkX operating in self sustained mode?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Egregio Andrea,
Do you intend to write your story (a book) about your endevors? I think it is important that future generations have your written account on all the things that have happend, are happening and will happen.
Thanks on behalf of my children;)
Cordiali saluti
Alen Kauzlaric
Dear Andrea,
A bit unusual, but this is Ego Out for today
Some interesting info,
Hi Andrea! In the last month I never came to visit your blog because I was so upset for the recent disturbing facts about IH (an awful collateral effect of capitalism) that I was fearful to damage the community with improper comments! hehe
The good thing is that now I have a full month of messages of yours, Koen, and all the others to enjoy! To inspire you during your work, please take a look to these fantastic videos picturing the upcoming new Webb Space Telescope, right standing in its 6.5 meters full golden glory for the first time in a clean room at Goddard Space Center:
freaking comparison with the Hubble:
The third is a video of the mirror being rotated in front of dr. John C. Mather, Senior Astrophysicist in the Observational Cosmology Laboratory and senior Project Scientist on the James Webb Space Telescope:
See it in full screen mode! Very impressive! A nice view of a scientist standing in front of its creature! I think you have similar sensations next to your creature… if I figure a video shooting yourself in front of your little Cat rotating around its axes (solemn music trumpeting in the background), in comparison it sounds a little ridiculous :), but I think the man is great and the machine is way more important than the Webb!
Dear Andrea,
you said that the volume of a 1 MW QuarkX will be around 100 liters (excluding heat sinks). Were you talking about 1MW of thermal or electric energy ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Dear Andrea!
Is the presciption for E-cat so complicated that no replicator has succeded to make it work properly?
Do you know yourself if it is something mysterious they have missed or are you also surprised?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you see this replication of your effect made by me356 of lenrforum ?
Dear Mr. Rossi,
When will you be able to show pictures of a Quark X ?
Dear Andrea,
have you tried to put the E-Cat in a static magnetic field? As you may know, hydrogen goes in resonance at 43MHz for each tesla of magnetic field. This is the MRI main principle. Since the hydrogen atoms are in a peculiar state when put in a static magnetic field, this can vary the reaction rate, maybe the reaction rate can be made exactly proportional to the power of an RF pulse at 43*B MHz… If my theory is correct, you may be able to exactly and instantly control the reaction rate. Even without external heat…
Maybe it is worth a try…
And this message is also to all the potential replicators in the wild, so please do not spam this comment…
Best Regards,
Dear Dr Andrea,
Please know that there is a rumour that ITER have a secret plan to buy up Quarks and use to produce free power so that they can have a COP>1 by 2035. Hehe.
Please make them first for us.
Best Wishes
Mr. Rossi
Did you already run a few QuarckX in parralel or serial operation?
Do they behave lake a battery or is the output AC?
Kind regards
Hello dr . Rossi , the Russians are talking about you !
The end of the oil … Generator Rossi
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Tom Darden together with Cherokee Investments Partners have filed for 2 bankrupcies in February 2016. Their investors lost 23 million dollars. Obviously all money of the investors: the money just disappeared.
It appears that Mr Darden customary collects investments in companies that end up dissipating the money of the investors with the excuse that the business is not gone well. With you they just found the wrong man: against any expectation, the E-Cat works and you really want to make an industry to produce it: you have broken their rules.
We will sustain you to the end.
Never give up.
Mr. Rossi,
Here is a link you may find interesting;
God Speed
Thomas Darden needs to realize that he believes it's perfectly okay to make our lives an endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real benefits to our health and happiness. More than anything else, such beliefs shed light on Darden's moral values and suggest incontrovertibly that he claims that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says temulent things.
In 2005 the Cherokee owned company EnCap received more than $300 million in publicly sponsored bond financing for the Meadowland project in New Jersey and then filed for bankruptcy protection later in 2008 and did not complete the project.
EnCap and another Cherokee affiliate earned millions of dollars in dumping fees on fill brought to the site.
Cherokee created a whopping 27 new business entities in New Jersey alone. William Gauger, the CEO that Darden appointed was indicted by FBI for "fraudulent invoicing scheme".
In 2003, Cherokee raised $620 million in equity for investment in projects around the world. Cherokee's portfolio of projects included industrial, office, hotel and residential properties. The shareholders of the investment funds are primarily large pension funds.
In the meantime, from 2001 to 2004, Cherokee and its consultants had contributed almost $1.5 million to the Democratic State Committee to win the project on Petty's Island, a $1 billion waterfront makeover intended to increase tax revenue and transform the town.
Cherokee's law firm DeCotiis even tapped Joseph Salema, a former top aide to Gov. James Florio. Salema pleaded guilty to securities fraud in 1995.
How much money did the politically connected DeCotiis law firm and other EnCap consultants make from the pool of public financing? The Record reported during its own yearlong investigation that the Teaneck firm had billed nearly $9 million by 2004 alone.
Thomas Darden's words sound pretty until you read between the lines and see that Darden is secretly saying that he intends to exploit public sympathy in order to bolster support for his worthless escapades.
Let me end this letter by challenging the readers to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that Mr. Thomas Darden's success is just a flash in the pan. Are you with me, or with the forces of aspheterism and oppression?
Folks, check your facts:
The Philly Inquirer
New York Times
Justia US Law
Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Report
Dear Andrea,
Recently you said the QuarkX will be demonstrated when it is 'ready', which you hope is within months.
It will underpin the details of the 'Tremendous Surprise' that will be revealed then.
Some questions if I may:
1. To whom will it be demonstrated? (I hope it will be open to public or us, you followers).
2. Where will it be demonstrated? (I assume Europe, Sweden?)
3. Is it right to assume that 'ready' means ready for sales, so the QuarkX factory is ready and fully equipped, and test runs were successfull?
Thanks for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
My blog, today- discovered a friend:
Best wishes,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
According to the current MIT Technology Review magazine, the latest cost overrun (not the total costs) for ITER will be $5.3 Billion (4.6 Billion Euros).
Assuming that 'F8' is positive, do you think you can build the first set of robust manufacturing facilities for the $5 Billion budgeted/(wasted) in this latest ITER cost overrun? At least that would be a good start!
How do you explain the diversion of such vast resources compared with the lack of support for the LENR alternatives?
QuarkX regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is working the QuarkX today?
Dear Andrea,
Ok, I will wait for the surprise! Another question: do you have a place already secured for the first QuarkX factory? Can you say where it is?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
To me, and I mean no malice by saying this, the biggest surprise would be to actually see the E-Cat X being demonstrated.
Best Regards,
F8 is a good key. So long everyting is in F8 stage is it possible to argue that you dont have any IP. (And i give you a reason to spam me he,he, he 😉
Sometimes is it better to attack like a bird protective the nest. It prevents the predator for a while instead for "vice versa"….
LENR is a research fields that will drive development forward with dizzying speed. Scientists will be drawn like a magnet to " LENR research " .
The cat is about electricity, heat and light , but also about so much more ..:)Warm Regards "Jag bara undrar?"
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I admire your way to defend your work: every phrase sustained with clear evidence against lies, intelligent irony against blunt insults, an enormous work to respond to infinite chatters. Obviously you are the winner.
Dear Andrea,
Why do you think the revelation of the E-Cat QuarkX will be such a surprise?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Folks seem to be having a hard time visualizing what is actually happening in an E-Cat. Please allow me to put forth this visual model in order to clarify the "inner workings" and "deep mysteries" within.
Consider a standard kitchen blender with a glass carafe, like you make margaritas in during warm summer afternoons.
Like most blenders, the lid has a small plug which can be removed for adding ingredients during operation. Around the hole for the plug there is a small flat lip.
Now, imagine this:
1. Remove the plug, and balance a few steel ball bearings on the lip around the hole.
2. Turn on the blender, just on low to start with, but SLOWLY increase the blender until it is up to "High".
Take a moment to look at it. The blades are whirling around at high RPM and the ball bearings are jiggling around from the vibration, teetering around the edge of the lip.
3. Now, WHACK the blender with a rolling pin!
What happens?
The ball bearings fall from the lip and into the fast spinning blades below, and are sent smashing through the glass of the carafe, shattering it into pieces!
In this visual aid, the blender blades are Nickel atoms, the ball bearings are Hydrogen Ions liberated from the Lithium-Aluminum-Hydride and the glass carafe is the web of Lithium Atoms mixed throughout.
Heating the mixture to just short of the melting point of the nickel, and pumping up the electron shells about the nickel nuclei is represented by the power of the high speed blades.
Whacking the blender with a rolling pin is identical to sending an Electromagnetic Pulse through the energized e-cat reactor vessel. Deformation of the electron shells causes the capture and eventual disassembly of hydrogen ions within the maelstrom of the electron shell energy fields resulting in the energetic expulsion of suddenly solitary protons.
These ejected protons then collide with lithium atoms and transmutate Lithium 7 to Beryllium 8, which promptly decay to two Alpha – which consequently gain electrons to become Helium atoms.
The process of the forced decay of Lithium to Helium – resulting in a large energy release – is well documented, and was the first nuclear fission process ever demonstrated. [see Cockcroft-Walton; 1932]
The genius of the e-cat is in its application of the primary LENR process (proton liberation from an energized nickel-hydride) to effectively utilize individual Nickel atoms as sub-Nano scale proton accelerators.
Indeed, this invention should be rightly considered a breakthrough in Nano-Tech Engineering, as the apparatus is, in fact, mechanical in nature rather than chemical or nuclear, just as a Scanning Electron Microscope is a MACHINE, not a "reaction".
Consider: This process does not involve molecular interactions and formations (other than the Hydride fuel supplement), so this exhibit can not be called "chemical" in nature. And, while we see Helium being produced while Hydrogen is consumed, this clearly is not "Fusion", as it is a sequence going through Lithium and then DOWN to Helium. Now, in modern terms, the breakdown of Beryllium is a "decay" into Alpha particles as radiation, so this clearly does not qualify as fission under current models.
So I repeat, the E-Cat is neither CHEMICAL, FISSION nor FUSION. It is a MACHINE! A beautiful, badass, Nano-Tech, Energy Liberating Machine!
GOD BLESS YOU, Mr. Rossi. May he continue to bless your endeavours with success, while you continue to work to bring this to the masses!
James Chapman
Dear Mr. Rossi,
The market for a LENR invention is almost immeasurable for the first 10-15 years (or even 30 years).. work for everybody. Just assume a majority of the close to 100 million vehicles entering the market every year can use a LENR based powertrain design. To that figure add all other applications that probably cripple the vehicle comparison. 1 Billion eCat devices would be needed every year to keep phase with the market needs for clean, abundant energy.
1000 factories with a 1 million output/year will have to run 24/7.
How many factories do you think is operating within.. lets say 5 years.
Dear Andrea,
do a single 100W QuarckX module can be activated and controlled by a small battery, for example a Smart Phone battery?
On the E-Cat, if i remember, the charge duration is about one year, on the QuarckX is possible to do a recharge or will be better change directly the single module?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea,
That's my blog issue for today, about Babel Tower
But it is a bit about verbal karate too
where I want to keep my Black Belt.
Dear Mr Rossi,
I could not help but to think of Industrial Heat while reading this article on Forbes.
* Did Theranos Break the Law?
Thank You for your work,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
How much of your daily time you dedicate to the study of Physics ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is working today the QuarkX ?
Dr Rossi,
Hints of a New Particle Could Completely Change Physics as We Know It
Assuming the June demonstration is a success and the customer purchases a number of the X,would this be the defining moment for all of your hard work and blood sweat and tears. Would it also provide the capital needed to launch your fabulous X to a mass market and making a difference in this world as you so humbly invinsioned it when you began this journey. In other words, would this be the defining moment to rise the curtain and gaze at the sunshine. Thank you and God bless.
In Dubai, the cost of solar energy touches all-time low
Submitted five bids for the third phase of the mega solar park from 5 GW of Dubai; the lowest, and winning, is only 2.99 cents per kilowatt hour.
The Emirate of Dubai has set a new world record for the cost of solar power .
This week, the Dubai Electricity & Water Authority ( DEWA ) has confirmed having received the lowest ever made offer on the price of photovoltaic electricity purchase : only 2.99 cents per kWh .
Dott. Rossi with ecatx be able to do a more competitive price for the current ?
Dear Andrea,
Update 2 from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/ on #LENR #ECAT Saga: Dewey Weaver – the FUD & Uncertainty Machine In Action!
All the best
Hello dr . Rossi: I want to suggest this reading.
Hidetsugu Ikegami
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the determination and the linearity of your behavior. You are inspiring.
Dear Dr. Rossi, I was thinking about electric cars. In this period there is much talk of Tesla and other electric cars. That's where the E-Cat QuarkX might be useful. Putting on board a pack of E-Cat QuarkX used to always keep charging batteries, you would have a virtually infinite range.
This would be a market with enormous possibilities. Are you also thinking about this during your R&D?
My Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Tesla powerwalls for home energy storage are hitting the US market.
Will your "surprise" surprise Elon Musk, too, and will your "surprise" make the Tesla powerwalls obsolete?
By the way: Tesla has a market cap now of 30 billion dollars. It will be interesting to see what will be the market cap of Leonardo corp. in a few years. The 89 millions dollars of IH are peanuts.
Best regards,
A electric/magnetic engine?
Dear mr Rossi,
Thanx for your detailed reply to my question about IH guided tours at the 1MW plant. ..Point taken.
As you may have noticed there are tons of analyses on the internet that tries to clear the fogs around IH:s actions.
However, as the story is unfolding it seems likely that there are no commercial or technical reason for not paying you, after all almost 100 USD million is still chicken feed compared to future revenues.
But energy business is more politics than common sense (hint). Someone is trying to buy time (hints).
Andrea Rossi
Thanks, sometimes I feel like a blind man trying to figure out what color a cat is by petting it. Like everyone here I'm looking forward to the QuarkX reveal.
Good luck and good health.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you update us about the QuarkX ?
Dear Dott.Rossi
I read about the new costumer who will be the new hope for the ecat business, but do you have some guarantees? You are a good scientist and a good businesman and you are able to do without any help so take your future in your hands good luck !
My best wishes,
General discussion question:
Off topic a bit and this is nowhere near my area of study an so may be a very foolish notion but, What if dark matter is made of undetectable particles because they are effected by a field competing with or opposed to the higgs field? Could they remain undetectable by us, given mass by the higgs field, and still have mass in our higgs field? Or could dark matter have no mass in our higgs field perception but the competing fields share a common particle the graviton?
Dr. Rossi, when E-Cat becomes widely available to produce electricity on a large scale, I doubt if any Country will construct another Wind, Solar, Geothermal, Hydroelectric, Coal or Nuke Plant.
I believe they will be phased out after their useful life.
However you will not put Oil Companies out of business, we need them to make 50 Items.
Click on, Things made from Oil-Household Products, Fuel for cars…
Robert Curto
Ft, Lauderdale, Florida
Dear Andrea,
Just a small correction: the Higgs field does not turn bosons into fermions, it just gives mass to particles, both bosons and fermions. Supersymmetry (if it exists) can turn bosons into fermions.
By the way, I don't think I know Dr. Pffft. Does he live here, I mean, on this very planet?
Serious regards, /pekka
Dear Mr. Rossi,
In one of your replies you briefly mentioned that IH had guided tours with potential customers during the one year test of the 1 MW plant.
Can you tell us a little bit more about these happenings??
* How many guided tours
* When was the last guided tour by IH.
Dear Andrea,
More insights provided by http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
#LENR #ECAT Saga: Dewey Weaver – the FUD & Uncertainty Machine In Action!
Posted on 2016/05/03
Best regards
Dear Andrea,
in previous comments you say that the Quarck-X is a very small object and 1MegWatt output can be obtained with a 100 Liters size.
After this few months of R&D on it/her what can you say, is the size of the single Quarck-X 100W module "scalable"? Can it be smaller
by improving process, materials and construction methodologies? Did you already had some step in this direction?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea,
Please see EGO OUT for today:
warm greetings,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Today I read that the House of Representatives has placed on their calender #177 to review H.R.9 Innovation Act. This will help inventors protect their IP against those who just want to take an IP without doing any work. I hope this passes soon. Good luck with your court proceedings.
Bernie Morrissey
Dear Andrea,
You say that everyone will be surprised when they learn about the E-Cat X. Does this mean that you are planning to reveal this technology in a way that the general public will become aware of it?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for answer yesterday, I am part of history now ! I hope QuarkX will be very pleasing when she grows up ( F8 ), send thanks to your Team from me, because they are great model workers. I believe you have been choosed by God for this important mission of massive industrialization ( bringing LENR to the world, cheap and clean ) ! Snakes and IH-puppets are trying to stop your great leap forward, with their clowneries and slanders: to protect fat wallets and steal your IP to give to Brillouin in DC Test… Why they file patent if E-Cat do not work ? Do you agree ?
Blessed Regards,
Dear dottore Rossi,
Let me guess what tremendous surprise could be.
Did You detect krono particles emitting from QuarkX.
That would finally enable us to see and hear what the dinosaurs real look an sound was.
Best regards and many success in your work.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Are you sure that Brillouin has succeded in replicating the Rossi effect ?
They have always worked on the electrolytic field, their patent applications, even the more recent, speak in this sense. How could they all in the sudden pass to the hot cat model successfully ?
Dear Andrea
I've read the interesting article from Georgia Institute of Technology linked by Drew G with title 'seven chemical separations to change the world'. The massive need of heat in a lot of very important separation processes is hilighted.
The article ends with suggestions to academic researchers and policymakers to develop ".. separation techniques that do not require distillation".
Don't you think that this will soon be changed by the massive diffusion of ECats technology ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Dear Andrea,
What is the meaning of the abbreviation F8? You might as well refresh the readers about the meaning of F9 also.
Best Regards
Andrea Rossi,
The Italian Company 'FINMECCANICA' is changing its name to Leonardo Company. Or, officially,
"Leonardo – Società per azioni (Leonardo S.p.a.)".
Have you heard about this name change, and do you or Leonardo Corporation have any connection with FINMECCANICA?
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
I'm excited about the potential of the E-Cat X Quark.
— The extreme modularity of the Quark will allow one ubiquitous component to be used in all sizes of applications: from kitchen appliances, to small heaters, to home power generators, to industrial applications, etc.
— The extreme high temperature, 1480C as mentioned on this blog, will allow for applications that a lower temperature E-Cat could not.
— The potential to produce electricity could yield devices, even early on, that consume zero net power from the grid, putting back in more than they consume. Later as more development happens, I envision them being used in place of batteries: that can produce higher wattages and last for years during non-stop operation.
I can only wish that while we wait for the E-Cat Quark X to hit the market — with millions of units being sold — replicators could figure out how to consistently and reliably achieve successful tests using the basic Ni-LiAlH4-Li combination. For the record, before this comment gets spammed like my last one, I am convinced that there have been successful replications by multiple individuals. The massive excess heat produced by the Rossi Effect has been reproduced.
I'm simply hoping that we can somehow figure out the enigmatic riddle as to why a few replicators achieve astounding and amazing results while the majority produce little to no excess heat whatsoever. Maybe this question will be solved soon. I'm hearing through the grapevine that there may be more information coming about successful replications. If the reports generated can provide enough data to figure out the missing parameters that are not being met in most experiments, then a flood of Rossi Effect replications could hit YouTube.
My dream would be to see all of this happen in the next couple months, so the replication "fever" can be in full force when you start making E-Cat Quark X announcements.
Keep up all you're hard work.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can we know how is your health ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you give an update about the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
In your R&D testing with the E-Cat QuarkX, is the average COP achieved higher than the average COP achieved the 1 year MW plant test?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
From Peter Gluck's Egoout website: Seven of the most energy intensive chemical separation processes
E-CAT application prospects?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are you familiar with the work of Hidetsugu Ikegami on the "Theory of the ChemoNuclear Transition"?
I never heard of his ideas until a few days ago.
They seem very interesting but I have not read them fully and do not know if these ideas are worthwhile. If so, to what extent are they being considered or tested?
From the scientific point of view, they seem plausible, but I have to study them further.
Anyway, continued good skill and good luck with your QuarkX development.
Highest Regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
My EGO OUT issue of today, with a strong Zen flavor:
Best wishes,
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The possible theoretical publication that Prof. Norman Cook and you are looking for will be also the consequence of experiments you will make together ?
Hello dr . Rossi , I send an interesting article. Excellent Geopolitical #LENR Analysis by Doug Marker
Dear Andrea,
It has occurred to me what the Sifferkoll figures will be when you make your 'announcement', hopefully in June. I would bet that the figures would jump tremendously. Interesting anyway.
Best wishes
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
How is going today the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have studied the test made by Brillouin in Washington DC: but it is a copy of your Hot Cat !
How can you tolerate it ?
Dear Andrea,
Another very interesting article of interest to LENR & E_CAT followers from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
Estimation #LENR #ECAT Knowledge and Interest; 1k hard core, 15k lurkers, 200k Interest, 2M awareness.
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi
I hope by 2017 we will be able to buy an E-Cat:
Dr Rossi,
Now, after this first month of litigation with IH, you can have an idea if it is going to damage your work to develope the E-Cat.
Has this work been slowed down ?
Dear Andrea
yesrerday you posted a nice and humoristic comments, but one of them is important: the fact that IH has received every three months a report with results equal to the results of the final report and said nothing in opposition is very convincing. The fact that they used the reports to convince investors is huge.
Despite what some others may believe I do believe Rossi complied with the terms of the agreement and supplied full IP to IH.
Proof is the 2 x 1MW plants that were manufactured by IH, the fuel formulated and loaded by IH and the control systems necessary to support and control SSM were incorporated into the 1MW plant build.
IE. SSM could not have happened unless the fuel IH loaded and the control systems designed into the 1MW plant could support it.
This is VERY IMPORTANT to understand.
It is like saying Rossi withheld the IP for a mobile phone to attach to the internet and then Rossi waved a magic wand over the phone that did not have internet support physically built in and magically it had internet support.
There are hardware control systems necessary to make SSM mode work. From my limited understanding too little heat feedback and it stops, too much and it goes into thermal runaway. So not something that can be simply added to the fuel. SSM support needs to be designed into the plant, which shows IH had the knowledge (IP) to design in SSM and to control it.
What I did read was nckhawk saying he considered the IH/Rossi contract was finalised by the payment of the $11.5m. Reading into that you could see that IH believed it had nothing to gain and $89m to lose by paying Rossi the final payment.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Fantastic answer to LookMoo.
You are always straight to the point, precise and base upon facts your comments.
Dr Andrea:
Your answer to LookMoo today is a gold nuggett.
Dear Dr Rossi,
I realize that you have not fully researched the ability of the Quark-X to produce electricity so do you think that, at this point, its most efficient method of producing mechanical power would be via steam production?
Best regards,
Iggy Dalrymple
Dear Andrea,
what is your estimation about the construction of the X-Quarck, i mean how many hours or days will takes to make a single 100watt Quark module without cooler apparatus and energy converters. At list, are we talking about hours, days, weeks….
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on your progress.
If you can answer them, I have a few questions.
1. What is your estimate of how many 1MW plant equivalents you will ship this year?
(Probably before automated assembly begins.)
2. What is your estimate of how many 1MW plant equivalents you will ship the first full year after automated assembly begins?
3. What is the maximum temperature that the Quark-X can maintain.
Dear Andrea,
This time I wote, with help from Edmund Storms about the Crisis and need to rethinking and re-definition
of the scientific branch of LENR:
There cannot be peace between the theorists
and between the theorists and reality
Dear Andrea:
Your answer to LookMoo is very convincing. The fact that IH received from the ERV one report every 3 months whose results were the same of the final report and they said nothing against the reports, but used them to get money from their investors speaks loud in your favour.
He He. Thanks Andrea for the tennis challenge. You make me wish I was in your neighborhood ;). But having read about your past supporting achievements I suspect you are very good at tennis too. I'm quite daunted about the idea of facing your legendary h-bar serves! The fact your wife is winning against you just shows very smart and skilled she is too. I suspect she has payed proper attention to your training and has worked out she can win against your h-bar serves by carefully Quantum Entangling your Tennis Rackets before the match!
My wife says there is always a very smart wife behind every and successful married man… Well mine is definetly much smarter than me so I hope I'm successful at something some day 😉
I have a cunning plan… Maybe if you swap the net with one with bigger holes in it you can tunnel the ball through it with out her noticing? 😉
Best Regards you both and all the best with your future tennis matches!
Dear Mr. Rossi,
How many ABB robots have you ordered?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is still in good standing the QuarkX ?Still very promising the R&D with "her" ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the comment about the 157 scientists and the lie detector: real fun.
According to Google translate, "Jag bara undrar" is swedish and translates to: "I'm just wondering". Now all we have to do, is determine its significance!
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Fantastic answer to the comment of Alf Stokes.
The clowneries of IH are giving to us all evicence of the fact that you are right.
They hired a psychologist that prostitutes himself to try to say you are nuts to justify the fact that IH is not paying you. They simply stink.
This give evidence you are right. You will win, no doubt about that.
Dear Andrea,,
Our little but not so innocent joke -is revealed here:
Very sorry for your tennis defeat..
As a small compensation, you will win the trial,
@Brokeeper. Great find! I will be very careful around squirrels from now on.
This issue maybe bigger and more serious than we thought:I just found a link to this following article (initially mentioned on MFMP On their Facebook page). http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/29/476154494/weasel-shuts-down-world-s-most-powerful-particle-collider
@Andrea Rossi. Thanks for keeping your courage and focus. Your humor is great relief to us too. After reading your blog I'm thinking to take up tennis, I guess I will useless at it at first but with some effort and focus on my side I think it will be fun and good relief and great way to relax…. Just as long as no squirrels run off with the ball 😉
A song for you! (humor)
As I know you are interested in music . I am planning a holiday trip to Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Alabama to listen to live music . Which states do you prefer? Maybe you have any other suggestions? I really liked the film " The Concert "
Dear Andrea,
I just received this secret picture of what's powering IH's secret 1MW load. It may be a reason why they have not been able to replicate the customer's 1MW COP.
Please be careful not to fall for these squirrels' ploy to have you take, in secret, one of their truth tests from their secret lie detector.
Dear Mr Rossi,
I don't know if this information may be interesting for you (it concerns an improvement in the art of making batteries and this improvement has been make by mistake)
Have a good day and I hope you will win at tennis today!
Rémi André
Dear Andrea,
Latest from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
Excellent Geopolitical #LENR Analysis by Doug Marker
Posted on 2016/04/29
Enjoy your weekend and your tennis!
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I saw the comment of Alf Stokes : do not worry, Andrea: if IH uses these arguments, you have already won the litigation.
Dear Andrea,
Today I wrote:
I am very sorry that the analyst says bad things but this is his meaning.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for your continue struggle and focus to give us the E-Cat. What counts for us is not your litigation, what counts for us is that the E-Cat arrives to the market.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How is gone today the R&D on the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
EGO OUT for today, thinner than usual
is here:
It is War in LENR-land and somebody tries to put muzzles on the Muses.
Finmeccanica has rebranded as Leonardo. Looks like a name conflict with your enterprise.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said a wise thing. It is useless to talk about reciprocal accusations out fo the Court; only in Court every statement must be sustained with evidence, while out of the Court any stupidity becomes an issue.
Thank you for your focus on the great work,
Dear Andrea:
You have indicated that with the Quark-X each individual unit is small, and that whatever power level is needed can be achieved by aggregating multiple Quark-X units.
A) Can I assume that in a multiple unit module the individual units have to be separated from each other – perhaps in a honeycomb pattern – so that coolant can flow between the units?
B) Approximately what would be the size of a hypothetical one megawatt total power Quark-X module?
Thank you if you can answer.
Dear Andrea,
Please be careful with this new partner. We don't want another IH…
What precautions you will take?
P.S.: since now the ECat is hotter than never, you can replace warm regards, with hot regards, or at least warmer regards!
Best Regards,
@ Mike Henderson:
Andrea Rossi is right, your calculation is wrong.
In ballpark numbers, 1 gal of diesel fuel is equivalent to about 40 kWh of energy. Therefore 1 MWh is equivalent to about 25 gal.
It is not a big issue for an industrial production. Also assuming there was excess of heat, it can be dumped in many ways by an expert of the art.
I think we must respect the fact that the ERV is a nuclear engineer that worked in a nuclear plant: he surely knows how to make measurements of energy in a plant that makes steam.
Dear Andrea,
Please look up the latest on http://www.sifferkoll.se
#LENR #ECAT Saga: The Most Important Inconsistency by Dewey Weaver (so far)!
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In this period you have to work on the QuarkX, produce the 1 MW plants that have been ordered, sustain the huge attacks that IH has orchestrated against you. How can you sustain this pressing ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When do you think the fog in the field of the confrontation between you and IH will dissipate ?
Dr. Rossi,
Is mass production of the 1MW Plant for the European market going to start this summer? If not, when do you see it starting?
Warm regards,
1MW of steam carries the equivalent of 70 gallons/hr of diesel fuel. How was the energy output consumed? How was it measured? How was waste heat disposed? Wasn't it ferociously hot?
Best regards,
Do you thermalize gamma using lead?
Dear Andrea,
Have you tested yet any new 1MW low temperature plants, built since the one used in the year-long test?
If so, how has it performed (are problems resolved)?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea:
Somebody has written that Prof. Norman Cook is no more working with you on the theoretical issues related to the E- Cat: is that true?
Thank you
Dear Andrea,
Here is the LENR Info for today:
My best wishes,
Dear Andrea,
You say the customer for whom you will be doing the upcoming test "is a partner who could strongly speed up the development process". Does this mean that this potential partner could assist with production of E-Cats?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr.Rossi,
One year is a long time to run a continuous test on the 1MW E-Cat. You are very brave.
You said the 1MW E-Cat has been upgraded, "with many corrections due to the experience that has been made". Were there some elements that performed better than expectations and other parts that required a lot of attention? Can you tell us about any surprises and lessons learned?
Looking forward to seeing your products in our home.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dear Andrea,
You have indicated that you are preparing for a QuarX test with a European customer in June. You have also indicated that it will have a variety in output power and that it will produce electricity.
I hope you will be able to answer the following questions for us:
1. What will be the duration of that test?
2. Is it right to assume that it will be a multiple QuarX?
3. What will be the maximum power level?
4. Will also the heat production be measured, or just the electrical COP?
5. Will the results be published?
6. Will the customer also help you with sales and/or production if the tests are a success?
Many thanks,
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain why this test is so important, and why this customer is so important?
Many thanks,
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your answer. Is it possible to let Mats Lewan participate during this test (if he protects the identity of your customer)?
Best regards
J. Heisenberg
Dear Andrea,
Are there still any plans to hold a press conference in Stockholm in June, now that Mats Lewan's Symposium got cancelled? I got the impression that the two were separate events, even though in close vicinity.
Best Regards,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
We are taking notice of this fact: while IH is continuing to slander you and to try to make a process on the blogs instead of in Court, where it belongs, you are focusing on your work and are turning a blind eye to the useless chatters. That is good.
Will be public the test you will make in Europe in June ?
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your answer about the E-Cat QuarkX testing. Very interesting. Are you ready technically for this test? Is this test scheduled on the calendar, or is the timing dependent upon the state of your R&D?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Where will be made the important test of June for your Customer ? Will it be with the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
Does the test with the important customer in June involve the E-Cat QuarkX?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
.. seen on ECW
Good Question to ask Industrial Heat and Mr Weaver ( aka Tom Darden):
Stanny Demesmaker
"Do you really think that it takes 3 years to test a 10kW LENR reactor to know that it produces excess heat?"
..and I like to add: if so, why during this time you collected 150 million dollars from investors after inviting them to attend your own replications in your factory of Raleigh ? If the replications were no good, why did you ask 150 million dollars to the investors ? Please do not say that you had other better technologies for the investors, because at that time you did have only the intellectual property of Andrea Rossi ( let alone the fact that the other technologies that you bought later are worth nothing, as everybody knows… the sole prototype that worked is the hot cat of Brillouin that you made them copy from Rossi ).
Dear Andrea,
In your reply to Wayne, do you mean that you never reach energies low enough to participate in either nuclear resonances or electronic resonances? There may be energies produced in your process that could participate in interactions with possible available energy configurations to decrease its level since it appears you are somehow thermalising the energy.
Thermal regards
Dear Dr. Rossi,
We all look very forward to your success with the your customers.
Is it possible that I could become a customer?
I would like only to rent an E-Cat or Quark reactor for 2 weeks. I will pay $100,000 rental fee. I will return the device in original condition. I will not open the device to examine the fuel or its components. I will sign any NDA that is required. I will agree to operate the device with Leonardo Corp. supervision.
I only have one purpose for this rental: to test the real-world performance as a customer of the product. I will then report the performance to the public.
This seems to be the scenario you have asked for now for many years: you want the market will confirm the performance of the E-Cat. I am the market. I can pay $100,000 (for 2 weeks rental!). I can confirm the performance.
Is this is possible? Will you rent to me one E-Cat for $100,000 for 2 weeks? And please, how soon can you make the sale? I can purchase immediately.
If this is not possible, can you please explain to me why not?
Most respect and warm regards,
Your invention will upend global economics. Because of this, your computers are attractive targets for hackers. Have you discovered evidence of penetration? We would enjoy hearing about that. Stay secure.
Best regards,
Dr Rossi,
There is information that concerns you on this link at eCat World.
from Josh H – Cutting Through the Fog Surrounding the Rossi/IH Dispute
Confusion to your enemies
Dear Andrea is it possible to tell us something about this new customer or does he/she/it also want to be a "secret customer"?
Best regards
Dr Rossi:
The industrial plants you received the orders of will be substantially equal to the one that has been tested for 350 days ?
Dear Andrea:
Keep on working, great job!
We are tired to pull carts with square wheels ( ha,ha,ha ).
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think that resonances play a role in your effect ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Dear Andrea,
Battlefields in many places- today's contribution to them:
Best wishes,
PS If possible please publish Patrick Ellul's New Survey on JONP too! Thanks!
Dear Andrea,
You mention you have a test with a 'very important customer' in June. Is this the same, or different, customer that has already ordered the three E-Cat plants you have already announced?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Science prescribes that LENR must emit high energy gamma rays. Why the E-Cat does not ?
Dear Andrea
How is going on the work with the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The British Government has released a document in which they say they are briefing about your E-Cat, but they have not yes a position about it nor a connection with you.
Any comment ?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
When can customers #2 thru #10 expect to receive their plants?
Curiously yours,
Dear Andrea
New 10 second survey. Anonymous but requires you to log in to block spammers from multiple responses.
Survey Link: http://goo.gl/forms/V2AePjKRQy .
Live Results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G1qVrpDJkHz9zD03dJZ1xxiDDjDeUT-62l0ly4cWIfU/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
Dear Andrea,
This EGO OUT for today
Survey, critical comment and some info.
Best wishes,
Dear Rossi,
Large Industry Robots projects usually takes 2 YEARs from order to operation (implementation/completion/production).
Assuming that this limitation also apply to you, is it not a better options to start a old fashion assembly line supported by subcontracts??
Such strategy distributed production will not only be faster but also address the issue with bottlenecks usually associated with large projects. And gradually introduced robot technology into the production.
Dr Rossi,
There is a very interesting thread at ECW
Titled: Cutting through the Fog Surrounding the Rossi/IH Dispute (Josh G)
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I saw a recent photo of you: compared to the photos of you we saw one year ago, you appear 10 years older. It is impressing how much you consumed yourself in this year inside the 1 MW E-Cat. How is your health ? You are too important to us, everybody has understood that LENR without you are at zero level, with or without IH.
God bless you,
Dear Andrea,
Another post by Josh G today 26th April 2016 at 13.47 on Mats Lewan's blog
Josh G
April 26, 2016 at 13:47
@NCkhawk (alias John Dewey Weaver, III)
Instead of worrying about our credibility, as the managing director of an investment fund with investments in IH and as a business colleague of Darden (and representative of IH at the recent Airbus conference), you might try spending more time being worried about your own reputation as an honest and savvy businessman (assuming you do).
With all the FUD you and others are spreading around here, it's hard to cut through the thick layer of fog, but I will try.
Both you and IH have stated clearly and unequivocally that IH has never (not once!) been able to substantiate the E-cat produces excess heat. And yet despite this fact, IH/Darden:
1. Spent a good deal of manpower and money on R&D to develop and produce a new iteration of the e-cat, which they sent to Lugano for testing. If they had never gotten Rossi's older version of e-cat to work, why invest a dime in R&D on it?
2. If they never got an e-cat to work and didn't believe the Lugano results, why on Earth would they agree to give Rossi the go-ahead on the 1MW test? You say he insisted, so fine, maybe they couldn't stop him. But why would they willingly spend a dime of their own money to pay for (at least) 2 technicians (Fulvio plus another person you always conveniently forget to mention), as well as 1/2 the costs of the ERV plus who knows what other costs? How did Darden get so wealthy by being so willing to piss money down the drain? Maybe he didn't care because it was his investor's money. This shows very poor business acumen and an appalling carelessness with other people's money. You may think that Rossi's insistence on going ahead with the 1MW test under the circumstances makes him look bad. But if Darden thought the e-cat didn't work, his willingness to go along with the test AND fork over money for it makes him look like a chump and a pushover.
3. If they caught Penon and Rossi early on trying to engage in fraud by switching flowmeters, then why on Earth would they agree to continue the test? Why on Earth would IH continue a test (which they were paying for half of + personnel + who knows what else) when they had just caught Rossi and Penon red-handed trying to commit fraud?!? Does that count as due diligence where you come from? Again, you think it makes Rossi and Penon look bad, but it also makes Darden look like an easy mark. As our exalted former El Presidente George Bush the Younger once said, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice … you can't get fooled again!"
4. If they never got the e-cat to work, then they also had no reason to believe the 1MW plant would work. But according to Rossi (and apparently he can document this for the courts), IH had Woodford and the Chinese and who knows who else visit the 1MW plant as part of their effort to raise investment capital. We don't know at this point if the reason they invested in IH is because of the e-cat (though Woodford capital says they spent 2 1/2 years on due diligence, so we assume that was the primary reason they were investing, since that was IH's first investment). So what you're saying is that Darden had no reason to think the e-cat worked, but went about raising money for it anyway on the pretense that it worked? Do you realize that you're basically accusing your own friend and colleague of fraud?
5. And as others have pointed out, if they have no reason to think the e-cat works, then why file a patent on the e-cat claiming to get a COP of 11? Did they just make that up? Lawyers are expensive and filing patents costs a lot of money. Why would they pay all that money to file several patents if the technology is bunk?
So you see, the position you've staked out is full of inconsistencies and internal contradictions.
I don't know exactly when you learned of all these details or when you invested your clients' money in IH. But if you knew before you invested that IH had never gotten the e-cat to work, then it doesn't seem like you made a wise investment on your clients' behalf. Even if you believe in LENR's promise, based on all your claims, I honestly don't see how you can continue to have faith in Darden's business acumen and IH's competence. I do know that if you had invested MY money in IH and then came out and told me everything you've said on this blog, I would insist on getting my money back, and I'd never give you another dime. So you don't exactly come out of this with your reputation intact, either.
In the course of spewing FUD and trying to bully us into keeping our mouths shut, you've only succeeded in damaging your own reputation, as well as that of Darden and IH. You've dug yourselves into an enormous hole, and I don't see how you can emerge unscathed.
I doubt you'll respond to this. And if you do, I can't imagine you'll offer a thorough, logical response to explain all of IH/Darden's absurd and inexplicable actions in this case — because there is no way to logically explain them. I definitely expect more ad hominems against the 'Rossi faithful' and attempts to bully me and others into remaining silent to protect our reputations. Mr. Weaver, as much as I truly enjoy watching you embarrass yourself, at this point I really think you should take your own advice.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Does the Higgs field affect the E-Cat ?
Dear Andrea,
from previous Q&A:
1- Did you request copies of all the energy and water bills paid by the customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat ? Answer. yes.
2- are those bills coherent with the COP indicated in the Report ? Answer: yes.
Very important but, even more important: the cost saving is about 6 or near to 50?
Best regards,
Giuliano Bettini.
Dear AR,
I am shocked and disappointed at your treatment by IH et al.
I want you to be at your top level for your R&D work – the world needs it.
A few of questions, if I may:
1. Are any aspects of the E-Cat X to be incorporated into the new orders for your 1 MW plants?
2. Is at least one of these orders to be industrial plant you were hoping to deploy in the UK?
3. How is the progress on the jet engine application?
with many thanks,
Greg Leonard
Dear Andrea,
You will find below a post made this morning by Josh G in Mats Lewans blog http://www.AnimpossibleInvention.com
April 26, 2016 at 10:28
@nckhawk @Matslewan @Sifferkol
@nckhawk wrote: "It's interesting that one of Darden's companies cleans up toxic waste sites."
Yet Cherokee's investments in brownfield remediation are questionable and some mired in controversy and accusations of dirty dealing and poor management.
Mats, in the interest of "bringing out the truth" about Darden and Cherokee investment partners, a couple of of your readers in other threads have brought to our attention Cherokee's dirty dealings and questionable reputation. When Cherokee invested in IH/Leonardo/Rossi and Darden gave a speech at ICCF, we were all more of less convinced that Rossi had found a savior and that Cherokee and Darden –a savvy businessman — had the best interests of LENR and the planet at heart. Well, the links below strongly suggest that Cherokee and Darden are probably not what we thought, and I think it's an important piece of the puzzle in terms of bringing the truth to light. It might also be a productive avenue for an investigative journalist to pursue. What it shows me is that it was actually Rossi who didn't do enough due diligence on Cherokee.
[Compiled from posts by @Trump it and @Stephen Suriano on the 'alternative hypothesis' thread:]
Andy Willner, executive director of the NY-NJ Baykeeper, an environmental watchdog group, is waiting to see how successful the remediations are.
"The confluence between brownfield redevelopment and dredge disposal is certainly a niche Cherokee has taken advantage of," Willner said. "Give credit where credit is due: They've found a niche market and exploited it."
"Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, is skeptical. "I think, quite frankly, they are much better at playing politics than anything else," Tittel said. "If you look at the company and how they make their money, they don't build anything, clean up anything. . . . They just flip the property. They're like the middleman."
Cherokee-related firms and officers have contributed at least $267,600 to state legislative and political campaigns and at least $80,700 to federal candidates from New Jersey since 1999."
Here is a report from the State of New Jersey Office of the Inspector General and it details bad behavior and ineptitude by Cherokee and its shell corporations that is reminiscent to what see in this affair:
"In 2000, Cherokee managed two private equity funds, known as Cherokee Investment Partners Funds I and II (CIP I and CIP II). Cherokee subsequently created and undertook management of two additional private equity funds, Cherokee Investment Partners Funds III and IV (CIP III and CIP IV). The shareholders of the investment funds are primarily large pension funds. "
"The majority owner of EnCap is Cherokee Investment Partners (Cherokee) through one of its four investment funds, CIP II. Cherokee has registered at least 27 business entities in New Jersey including Cherokee North Arlington, LLC, Cherokee Porete, LLC, and Cherokee Porete Urban Renewal, LLC. "
"As discussed in Section III, after EnCap was awarded the project Cherokee Investment Partners II acquired a 65% ownership. "
"EnCap's main equity investor is Cherokee Investment Partners II (CIP II), which is managed by Cherokee Investment Partners (Cherokee) and has several affiliates and subsidiaries. Thomas Darden is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Cherokee"
"On April 25, 2002, Thomas Darden contributed $25,000 to the New Jersey Democratic State Committee; • On November 15, 2002, Darden contributed $3,000 to the New Jersey Republican State Committee; and • On April 23, 2004, Darden contributed $15, 000 to the New Jersey Democratic State Committee.
Encap won a contract in 2000 from the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission to cap and close four landfills in the Meadowlands and to sell the land for residential, commercial and recreational development, including golf courses. In December 2005, Encap received more than $300 million in publicly sponsored bond financing, including more than $200 million in loans from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Trust. Encap's project in the Meadowlands was the subject of a report by the New Jersey Office of Inspector General in February 2008. Encap filed for bankruptcy protection later in 2008 and did not complete the project.
Feb 2016
"Two closely affiliated companies that own the site of an idled urban redevelopment project in the Charleston Neck Area filed for bankruptcy Monday with the goal of selling most of the 182-acre property.
Bogged down by the last economic downturn and lengthy litigation, Ashley I LLC and Ashley II LLC sought protection from creditors in Columbia. Their debts total more than $23 million, with much of that owed to one lender, according to the filings."
"Ashley I and Ashley II, which began acquiring property in 2002, are owned by Raleigh-based Cherokee Investment Partners. Cherokee did not respond to requests for comment Monday
Dear Mr. Rossi,
IH have been very, very active in Washington demonstrating LENR for lawmakers. They have hired "APCO Worldwide" (lobbyists) to inform member of the Congress and Senate of IH:s version of the LENR story.
You have expressed confidence in the American system but to get it to work you needs to fully participate (not only lawsuits).
Have you any plans to make demonstrations for lawmakers or any other Government agency to balance IH actions??
If you don't.. the lawmakers will make regulations based on information passed by "APCO Worldwide".
Dear Andrea,
What can you tell us about the status of the Leonardo Corp's E-Cat production facility?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Today's issue of my Blog:
All the best,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Sorry for giving you just these links, too much to put the information in one sentence, but but they disclose that outgoing from Thomas Darden II a whole corporate network is acting to prevent your Ecat -Technology or to take it over …
… my questions to you is, are you personally and/or your lawyers aware of what is more or less obviously going on in the background? I cannot catch up the complete picture, but you know the people personally and have a better inside view, because for me it looks like that there is a huge multi level anti LENR Ecat campaign running to discredit you personally and your technology in general, including cyber attacks by professionals. Have you also had cyber attacks on your website and do you have the 'feeling' that 'powerful financial forces' are acting against you and your technology and last but not least, are you afraid?
Best regards and all the best to you!
Felix Rends – Moderator http://www.lenr-forum.com
Hello, Dr Rossi:
I am sending this update from animpossibleinvention
Dear Andrea,
Please read the following from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
#LENR #ECAT saga: Weaver goes Schizofrenic about Penon and Reveals a Goldmine of #Cryptodenialism to Study!
Best regards
Hello Andrea,
This is my current working hypothesis that I posted on Mats Lewan's forum.
I could be WRONG. I may very well be incorrect. But the following is what I've hypothesized from what I know.
That is a plausible hypothesis. I'll share my current working hypothesis with you. I could be wrong, and I hope I'm wrong. This hypothesis would mean that very powerful, wealthy, and "evil" forces are at work. Please note that I've been trying to some degree, so far, on this forum to give I.H. the benefit of the doubt. In the following highly speculative scenario — which could be totally off — I erase that benefit.
1 — The Rossi technology works as claimed and has been successfully replicated.
2 — When Andrea Rossi transferred the IP, he gave them ALL the information needed to produce working reactors of every kind. The low temperature units of every design and the high temperature units of every design.
3 — Industrial Heat successfully replicated the Rossi Effect repeatedly: inside their lab with Rossi present, at demonstrations to acquire investment, and in private locations that they disclosed to no one.
4 — In one of these private labs, they performed a long series of tests. The results were phenomenal. The bursts of excess heat were enormous and could last in self sustain mode for extended periods of time. However, they were also difficult to control precisely, which is a moot point; they had the money to hire engineers to design, build, and test a variety of control mechanisms.
5 — Darden showed these highly successful experiments to a wide array of individuals. Not only investors and stock holds in IH, but also government, military, and large corporate interests.
6 — More than one startled, alarmed prominent persons made statements such as…
a) "Tom, do you realize what you have here? This technology can never get out."
b) "We can't let Rossi introduce this to the market; this is the definition of a disruptive technology."
c) "If the truth of this technology gets out, my company will go under — all our investments in solar power will be worthless."
7 — Tom Darden and the "powers that be" came up with a plan. Continue working on the technology privately while publicly buying up all the LENR intellectual property they could find. Meanwhile, they would work to do three things: come up with a plan to introduce a very weak version of LENR (perhaps a modified version of Brillouin's technology) to be used sparingly to clean up the emissions from the dirtiest power plants, figure out a way to control the entire LENR field, and find a way to slow down or stop Rossi.
8 — The test of Rossi's 1MW plant was turning out to be a huge success. They decided that paying him wasn't an option — directly funding the proliferation of the E-Cat technology would make enemies of all their allies in the energy industry and upset other major "powers" that wouldn't want every nation in the world to have access to an unlimited source of dirt cheap energy. So they decided the best option would be to not pay and spend a couple million over a few years to fight Rossi in court. This would only cost a fraction of paying Rossi the 89 million while keeping everyone on the "inside" somewhat pacified. More importantly, it might buy them time to coordinate their CONTROLLED introduction of LENR to the world.
9 — The last thing they want to see now are multiple successful replications of the E-Cat technology by third parties. They hope that by mocking, attacking, and belittling Rossi in every way possible (personal visits by IH, emails, posts on blogs) they can at least dissuade individuals from focusing on the Rossi Effect and convince them to turn their attention to lesser LENR technologies — THAT THEY CONTROL.
10 — Their greatest fear is the E-Cat X Quark. If Rossi can scale up production to the billions of a product that can produce a very high thermal COP while producing some level of electricity directly, all current energy industries will start to shake and topple like a 9.0 Earthquake would shake New York City. All solar power companies, wind power companies, and even fossil fuel companies would be severely impacted. Many would flat out collapse.
Dr Andrea Rossi
A poll made yesterday confirms that people trust in you has increased after the complaint against IH, notwithstanding their massive attack against you made with powerful financial means.
How do you explain ?
Dear Andrea Rossi
Thank you for the model you gave us to understand how the Higgs field works: very nice.
Mr Rossi:
1- Did you request copies of all the energy and water bills paid by the customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat ?
2- are those bills coherent with the COP indicated in the Report ?
Just a curiosity, if you can answer.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
The Solar Impulse 2 plane and its two pilots are currently attempting to circumvent the globe by using only solar power to promote clean technologies.
Theoretically, if you remove the solar panels from the plane and retrofit it with several lightweight E-Cat QuarkX reactors to power its electric engines, you could easily demonstrate the tremendous capabilities of your E-Cat QuarkX to the world. With no solar panels on the plane, and with no heavy fuel or batteries stored onboard (with maybe the exception of a single emergency battery), no one could dispute that the E-Cat QuarkX was indeed providing the only power to the plane's electric engines.
If the LENR community were to get several sponsors to fund this demonstration (circumvent the world in record time), and if you would provide the necessary E-Cat QuarkXs, would you consider this a valid and dramatic way to show the E-Cat QuarkX to the rest of the world? I and your legions of fans want you win this battle against those that are trying to steal from you, and drag your good name through the mud. Let's shut up the skeptics with a dramatic demo that would leave no doubt that your E-Cat QuarkX will change the world!
Here's a link to the Solar Impulse website: http://www.solarimpulse.com/.
BTW, the Solar Impulse 2 effort is sponsored by Google, watchmaker Omega and robotics-focused ABB, among others.
With warm regards,
Is the geometry of the face centered cubic crystal (FCC) structure a necessary condition for LENR? I am intrigued by zirconium, but it has a hexagonal closest packing (HCP) structure. Does that or anything else negate zirconium as a catalyst?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The Opera ballet dancers are saying they do not need your technology because they have bought other much better technologies.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I tried to figure out how the Higgs boson works. A firend of mine told me you are able to make easier difficult concepts.
Can you make me able to figure out how the Higgs boson works?
Thank you
Dear Maurice,
It would be difficult for a single emission photon to be decreased by as much as would take the photon down to the KeV level by recoil effects. But if the process involved a cascading resonance process where there were multiple resonances, perhaps the accumulated recoil losses could take the initial photon down to this level, similar to the process found in fluorescence.
Energy level regards.
Dear Andrea,
Like many,many of your followers I know your technology works. My own thoughts are that IH are not stealing your technology but stopping you from bringing it into the world at this present time because one day it will have to be used. I do not know whether you can use it with a pending court case but if you can, maybe you should investigate the cement manufacturing industry, one of the oldest manufactured product in high demand but what it requires is lots of heat which contributes to most of its expense. If you could partner with people in the cement business or those who would like to get into the cement business I am sure your technology would propel you to be a world leader in both cement and LENR technology (not that you already not) and if you became a public company you would be inundated with prospective shareholders. I for one would be one. All the best Eric
Dear Andrea,
Here is another accusation from Mr. Weaver.
"Argon – how do you know so much about Rossi? Perhaps you should ask him about the flow meters that he replaced instead of the ones that IH spec'd and installed when the 1MW was built. That one is going to hurt when the truth comes out in court. The gig is up – the world is not going to wait for any more demos. The Lucy Peanuts football trick is played out."
Mr. Weaver alleges that you removed meters that IH had installed and replaced them with your own. This is the boldest accusation ever made so far by anyone from or in contact with I.H.
"Andrea Rossi is in a league of his own, beyond the rest of the LENR field, due to the triumph of the E-Cat technology. His recipe of carbonyl nickel, lithium aluminum hydride, and elemental lithium produces results far beyond the wildest dreams of other researchers. Everyone in the minor leagues should have realized this when, early on in this saga, Dr. Levi operated an E-Cat for EIGHTEEN HOURS primarily in self sustain mode. Repeatedly, he has conducted tests showing the massive excess heat his technology can produce. A one time assistant, who went by the handle Cures on the Cobraf forum, described in posts (some of which have been removed) countless early hot cats melting down. They would run away and reach temperatures that could melt ceramic. Hydrogen from a tank or from a chemical source — the massive excess heat was the same. He went so far as to report that the excess heat could be triggered by strait DC, pulsed DC, or AC input. Beyond Cures, we have third parties that have witnessed massive excess heat production. Some of these reports are still confidential, but others have been reported on. We also have replicators who have witnessed massive excess heat from the mixture of Ni and LiAlH4. Parkhomov achieved excess heat and at least one short period of self sustain, Songsheng achieved THREE HOURS of self sustaining excess heat at temperatures around 1300C in addition to other periods, N. Stepanov measured excess heat production by water flow calorimetry along with witnessing meltdowns, and there have been other replications as well.
The E-Cat technology doesn't just represent a hit that could get LENR onto first base, in the hopes of eventually scoring a run in the form of a commercial product. In fact, a GRAND SLAM HOME RUN doesn't do the E-Cat justice, metaphorically speaking. The "problem" some people refer to isn't the E-Cat technology itself or Rossi's less than mellow personality. Jealousy is at work. That's right, the sin of COVETOUSNESS.
Every LENR researcher wishes THEIR PRODUCT matched up or even came close to the performance of the E-Cat. So there is naturally a decent amount of resentment in the field against Rossi. After many years of work — although not with the same tireless work ethic of Rossi's — they have been able to, at best, generate very modest levels of COP at fairly low temperatures. Then all of a sudden there is a guy who shows off a string of reactor designs (for a while it seemed like there was a new demonstration every few weeks) with a LENR fuel capable of producing at least a KILOWATT PER GRAM at INFINITE COP (self sustain mode). Then a little while later, he ratchets up the temperature to levels which would allow easy-as-cake conversion to electricity using ordinary off the shelf steam turbines. The situation is like having a stranger move into your cul-de-sac, him having an estranged great aunt pass away leaving him an inheritance that pays off his house, and then win the jackpot lottery, all in the same month!
Even a regular church attending, Bible reading, soup kitchen volunteer that mows his elderly neighbors grass (for free) out of the goodness of his heart would feel at least a small pang of jealousy! Anyone would!
If LENR insiders are moving away from Rossi, the reason isn't because he is a scammer. The opposite is true. They would simply feel more comfortable without their super lucky neighbor hanging around. A mansion in Beverly Hills, a luxurious condo in Trump Tower, a luxurious mansion on a private island: he can live anywhere but the suburbs of LENR land!
Now let's get back to reality. The E-Cat works. Anyone who has followed this whole affair from the start MUST see that. And I am absolutely certain beyond any doubt that Thomas Darden of Cherokee is convinced the E-Cat works — including the one megawatt plant. Combining the huge amount of evidence for gigantic exothermic releases of energy with the setup of the 350 day test there is NO WAY a COP of 6 could be mistaken for a COP of 50. There were too many knowledgeable people there, too many sets of measurement equipment, and the test was too long for such a mistake to go unnoticed. In addition, the customer had THREE THINGS that would indicate if the plant was functioning at high COP: the WATER BILL, the ELECTRIC BILL, the QUANTITY OF PRODUCT MANUFACTURED. Each and every month if even ONE of these were significantly off it would have been an OBVIOUS SIGN something was wrong. If the water bill was LOW that would mean the plant wasn't producing the correct amount of steam and their production rate of nickel sponge would have dropped or halted. To be blunt, Johnson Matthey's engineers have the experience to know if a megawatt of steam — what was needed for the production at the plant — was being produced or not. If the electric bill was not dropping dramatically from before the plant was installed that would tell them that the COP was obviously low. From what we have been told by Mats Lewan, from one of his sources, the electric bill dropped dramatically! Also, if the plant wasn't producing the amount of heat required the manufacturing process would have slowed or stopped. And, of course, since the plant could only pull 300kW at maximum from the grid, if there was no significant excess heat produced, the plant could NOT HAVE PRODUCED THE NEEDED QUANTITY OF STEAM!
The 1MW plant worked and it worked wonderfully. For some reason we do not yet understand, Industrial Heat is denying this fact and trying to avoid paying Andrea Rossi. I really and sincerely hope the reason for their false assertions is that they just don't have the money. Being unable to pay due to not having the money in the bank wouldn't make up for what they've done. But at least it would be a less than totally nefarious answer to why they refused to pay and are being dishonest (trying to be diplomatic here because I don't like calling people liars) about the performance of the plant.
In a far worse scenario, Leonardo Corporation could be correct in their assertion: once Industrial Heat acquired Rossi's intellectual property they had no intention of paying him another red cent. Why could this be? I'll give a possibility that may or may not be correct, but it makes sense in my mind according to the knowledge I've accumulated by following this saga since the start.
Thomas Darden knows the E-Cat holds the potential to rapidly decimate all other sources of energy — including his precious renewable such as solar and wind. The E-Cat is simply an ideal technology that is far beyond what hot fusion scientists think may be possible in another thirty or forty years! Small, portable, energy dense, high temperature, clean, non-polluting, safe, and the closest thing to "free energy" mankind will ever figure out: the Energy Catalyzer holds too much disruptive potential. If accepted by the mainstream media and scientific community as real, the E-Cat wouldn't just "rock the boat" but could send every solar panel company, every wind energy company, and every conventional alternative energy company into BANKRUPTCY!
No government is going to give funding, grants, or tax breaks to solar, wind, tidal, or biofuel companies when the E-Cat exists.
No private institution is going to provide investment dollars or even loans to these companies.
No legislature, congress, or executive order from a sitting president will be able to save them.
I don't think Thomas Darden wants this to happen. And I think the same is true for the individuals that compose the circles of influence and power he communicates with. They want the status quo to be maintained and upheld. For this to happen, the hardest working, most intuitive, and luckiest man on the planet — Andrea Rossi — has to be stopped from commercializing his IMPOSSIBLE INVENTION, his PARADIGM SHATTERING MIRACLE, his SOLAR INDUSTRY STOCK CRASHER!
So they decide not to pay — possibly thinking they could re-negotiate with Rossi to drag things out for another extended period of time.
But Rossi has been back-stabbed, cheated, swindled, lied to, and attacked ruthlessly repeatedly in his life — yet he has survived to this day because he LEARNED from each of the encounters. As things were leading up to the completion of the test, he saw the writing on the wall, the signs that were obvious to see, and listened carefully to what was being said. He's a great observer, and he knew something wasn't right. Instead of begging and pleading to try and convince Industrial Heat his technology worked — when they already had the absolute proof — he came out swinging his white hot nickel plated, alpha particle emitting sword to defend himself.
The whole situation IS a headache for all of us. I agree with that. And the lawsuit has done damage to the LENR community. I agree with that as well. I'd even go so far that to outsiders or those individuals who have only casually kept up with this saga, the field looks like a "fusion" between an episode of MacGuyver and Breaking Bad. However, in this case, the damage to the image and reputation of the LENR field is not Rossi's fault. In my humble opinion, it lies squarely on Industrial Heat.
I'm not perfect. I could be wrong about several aspects of this analysis. My hope is that the issue is really *only* about Industrial Heat's lack of ability to round up the dough. But that just doesn't seem to make sense to me. What I know I'm not wrong about is the reality of the E-Cat. There is zero doubt whatsoever in my mind that it represents an energy breakthrough that rivals the warp cores and Mr. Fusion's of science fiction.
If anything, our community shouldn't distance ourselves from Rossi. Conversely, we need to push forward to perform additional replications of the E-Cat technology and support his efforts to commercialize the E-Cat Quark X. Whom I think, according to my understanding of the situation, that we should distance ourselves from is Industrial Heat."
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Any comments to the latest blog from Sifferkoll?
Dear Andrea,
See please
What you say here is Ok, however I have to confess that my story is too tragic
and I regret that I had to write it.
But, in a sense I had to do it.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the "reverse Mossbauer Effect": are you sure the recoil energy is enough to subtract energy from the gamma rays to the point to reduce them to 50-100 keVs ?
Thank you,
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Industrial Heat is slandering you beyond any possible imagination, but all they say is in evident contrast with the reality we can read in the facts. The more their puppets attack your character, the more we are convinced of the fact that they are not able to give to their investors a valid reason not to pay you and to lose your license.
There is only one explication for their behavior: they really have made disappear all the money the investors gave them and now they have not the money to pay you. This is the sole logic explication of what is going on.
The last attack made by NVHawk ( obviously a puppet of Tom Darden, probably the same that with an empty shell has has collected millions to be put in IH from investors) is that the flowmeter has been removed from the ERV and they could not have information of it; but you said repeatedly that all the instrumentation was property of the ERV and that the ERV has disassembled it at the end of the test to send it to the manufacturers to check the status of every instrument. This behavior of the ERV has been perfectly correct. Obviously, when he removed the instrumentation, included the flowmeter, all the guys of IH and Leonardo were around to control and take picture of everything, am I correct ?
Be careful , Andrea: that kind of people are ready to do anything to eliminate a person they have a debt of 89 millions with. Now they are saying slanders and lies…
Be careful.
Andy Stokes
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The new QuarkX is clerly something substantially different from what we know about the E-Cat described so far.
Please accept two questions:
1- do the electronics make the difference ?
2- do electronic or electric engineers of the team that worked with you during the 1 year test participate to this R&D ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In past you already had written in this blog that you were working to make a massive production factory. It was more than three years ago.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
J.O.N.P. has become the new "Comentarii de bello Gallico".
Have a good fight!
Dear Andrea:
Did the ERV make the certification of his instruments? Where is such instrumentation now?
Dear Mr Rossi
My thoughts are with you, you are on the right side of history
Dear Andrea,
Interesting news on Sifferkoll attack,!
Even better news your announcement of meeting in June!!!! Great!!!!
All the very best
Dear Dr Rossi:
It is confirmed: a puppet of Tom Darden (Weaver) has seriously hacked the blog of Sifferkoll because he was fighting to find the truth about IH stealing your IP.
Hello Dr Rossi,
in your answer to LL you made a statement about certification.
Speaking about that agreed upon certification process – is that process for the QuarkX itself as a machine, or is it related to industrial or domestic certification?
Thanks for clearing up any misunderstandings.
Best regards and all the best to you and your team,
Dear Andrea,
You wrote: "In June there will be an extremely important meeting with due persons with a closed doors official test."
1. Is this going to be an extended test over days?
2. Will it be in connection with a) product sales, or b) certification?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea
This is today's issue of my blog.
warmest regards,
Dear Andrea,
You answered to "LL" that in June you will have a closed doors official test. This sounds very good. My only advice is a trivial one: make sure that you have understood the testing protocol exactly in the same way as those who will be observing it. How to do it? By repeating to them in own words everything that they require you to do, and requiring them to do the same to those requirements that you have.
As an example, just very recently I was part of an episode (unrelated to LENR, of course) where one person had misread one sentence in a slightly sloppily written official document. As a result, 100 emails were exchanged between five people, until it was realised that all was just much ado about nothing. (No problem since this is government: we are even supposed to be inefficient:-)
Cross-checking regards, /pekka
>The sun is rising
and the day will be beautiful!
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the theory you are developing: how do you explain the fact that no gamma rays with high energy are emitted fron the E-Cats ?
Dear Andrea,
I think I'm aware of a few of the "snakes" to whom you are referring.
In reality, most of them have very little to no concern WHATSOEVER about radiation being emitted outside of the reactor. The fundamental root of their antagonistic and obsessively mean spirited behavior is simple: they're jealous.
No one has been able to develop an LENR technology that comes remotely close to the E-Cat.
– No one has achieved the power output per gram of fuel. Parkhomov, who replicated the Rossi Effect, was able to achieve about a kilowatt per gram of fuel. This is completely unoptimized and without the know how you possess that obviously boosts this figure higher. Conversely, you're competitors sometimes brag about a few watts per KILOGRAM of their version of a "charge."
– No one has achieved stable output at the ultra high temperatures the E-Cat can reach. If the E-Cat X operates at 1480C, as you have stated, you're literally miles beyond them.
– Although no one has achieved the massive power output you have per gram of fuel, the E-Cat is also capable of doing this in a SELF SUSTAINING MANNER for periods of many hours. And this is not a new development: the 18 hour test Dr. Levi performed many years ago with a much more early version of the E-Cat was mostly in SSM!
– When all of this is brought up, you're detractors then struggle to look for negatives about your technology. They usually resort to off the wall and false accusations like: he must produce neutrons at such high temperatures, he must "seed" his fuel with radioactive isotopes, or he is risking human safety by operating in self sustain mode.
As I said before, the root of all this hostility is JEALOUSY. They are breaking one of the Ten Commandments by COVETING your technology. Then, furthermore, they are giving FALSE WITNESS against you.
They know as well as both of us that the technology is safe. If it were not safe, you'd be in the grave by now. For goodness sakes, you've witnessed so many meltdowns during intentional torture tests that if the technology emitted radiation you wouldn't be with us today!
Sadly, in addition to their jealous rage that they were not the first to develop a practical high powered LENR technolgoy like the E-Cat, some of them have developed a personal vendetta against you. They have issues with you as a human being. I know this for a fact: one "snake" told me that if the E-Cat turned out to be real the fact *you* had developed it would basically shatter his reality (paraphrasing here and not giving an exact quote).
I just wanted to set the record straight for readers. The snakes out there aren't concerned about radiation being emitted: they're simply acting like a snot nosed brat in elementary school who is pitching a tantrum because his entry into the science fair didn't win a medal. He then goes up to the display table of the star pupil who took FIRST PLACE and tries to knock it over. The good news is that in the end, the principal of the school catches him in time, puts a dunce cap on his head, and makes him stand in the corner: where he needs to stay.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you give an update about the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi
What do you think of the Paris world conference concerning the global warming?
Dear Andrea,
Your kind answers and some LENR Info is here:
best wishes,
Dear Michelangelo Gucci,
Please contact us by email email@example.com
Best Regards,
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Dear Dr Rossi
Why is it Good to NOT Release the COP~50 ERV #LENR Report?
Mr. Rossi,
I've to honestly confess you -as a foreword- that I'm on the skeptical side of the road, wrt E-Cat story.
This said, I'm rather surprised when I read that, according to your words:
1- the robotized line to produce the E-Cats is already in production
2- the programs of the robots will be adjusted as soon as we will have the requirements from the certificators
3- we already got the green light from all the competent Authorities, so far the certifications are done
Are you saying you've setup a production factory, able to manufacture MILLIONS of devices per year, without any information spillage?
Have you excavated a deep bunker under a high mountain, and hidden your factory there, or drilled the Moon, or what?
It seems really difficult to me to cover such a -probably- huge and complex factory and keep confidential the whole process. Really unbeleivable, if I have to be honest.
So, may I kindly ask you at least where (meaning: in which Country) the factory is located? If not the Country, may I at least know the continent?
Thanks in advance,
seen on ECW:
I can See that Mr Rossi has not finished his Marathon run yet.
Being the tenacious man that he undoubtedly is he will go till the finish.
The hills and dales that have and still confront him leave the man undaunted.
He runs on still controlling his pace and breathing.
We will applauded when he crosses the line.
Mats Lewan Calls for "Group Effort" to Get to the Truth on Rossi/IH Affair.
Dear Andrea,
In my opinion, Intel would be a better model for you than Microsoft. Intel's product is physical and their market has competition (AMD) which they win by large production volume and by making good products.
A Microsoft-type monopoly is only possible in a market where the interface is (or can be made) too complicated for competitors to follow. In energy production the interface is very simple because it is just energy, a physical quantity. It's even simpler than in Intel's case, where the interface is the instruction set (AMD competes with Intel by using the same instruction set). The simpler the interface, the easier it is to compete.
regards, /pekka
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Will the E-Cat be distributed also in Italy, if you will reach a massive production?
Dear Andrea,
Did you ever think to sell energy instead of devices? If you start selling cheaper energy, you should have the discussions moved away from the technology you are using to produce it.
Dear Andrea,
It is with dismay I see that your blog is no longer about invention and progress, but about legal battles. Morally I am on your side, whatever that is worth. I hope you manage to turn this around. You deserve it. The life as an inventor is a tough life. Thieves are around every corner. It is tough to invent, but it is easy to steal.
Best Regards
Dr Rossi,
Do you use titanium in the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi
Did I understand well that you now aim at making a small module to pile up more modules and reach any power limit ?
Do you know a Mr John Dewey Weaver, CEO of the venture capital group "Deep River Venture", in Raleigh, North Carolina, a good friend of Tom Darden, has played a role in collecting money from investors to put it in IH Holdings International Ltd, where Woodford and Tom Darden have put all the money of the investors saying it was to buy your IP
Are you aware of this company "Deep River Venture" and John Dewey Weaver ??
Torkel Nyberg ('Sifferkoll') and Mats Lewan are
doing a pretty good job of trying to untangle the mess:
if you can answer, according to your (past) agreement, does IH have rights for all versions of e-cat or is limited somehow?
Thanks, Gherardo
Dr Rossi,
Please share this interesting link – Wow! $100 Million Contract Signed For LENR
"Believe me, nobody in their right mind would pay $16m for a technology that doesn't work. We're living in interesting times, people. I hope you have positioned yourself to profit from the coming Energy Revolution."
Dear Andrea,
During the 1-year E-Cat plant test, during the time the plant was operating (excluding down times), what was the average power output (thermal)?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr. Rossi, you have been vigilant and valiant trying to keep your IP from what I call Crony Capitalists (Wikipedia definition). IH and Darden have hired the brightest and the best propagandists and legal minds in the world to bend public opinion and our laws to take control of LENR. I realize I do not have as many of the facts as you do, but from my perspective there are three things you can do to counter the propaganda and legal landslide that is about to hit you: 1) Release the report on the yearlong test 2) Get a reliable customer to come forward and vouch for economic value of your E-Cat 3) Sell as many of your E-Cats to customers as fast as possible. Respectfully, what do you say to these three suggestions?
Dear Andrea,
Just published daily info:
Please do not take the DAILY NOTES as serious, it is simply amazing what nightmarish low IQ attacks can take place.
Caro Dott Rossi,
solidale,come sempre.
Cari saluti Giovanni Guerrini
Dear Andreas Rossi,
Please understand that Tom Darden and Industrial Heat want what you
have and they will stop at nothing to get it.
Tom Darden sold your dream to his investors and they listened
and invested in the ecat – YOUR ECAT – and now you have
suffered irreparable damage short of a settlement equal to the crime.
This will take many years to crawl through the courts and that is
exactly what they want to string you out with extended court dates
and appeals year after year.
All we can hope is that you follow up with your own production
and eventually the home units.
Dear Andrea,
Can you answer the following questions:
1. What was the maximum electricity input available to the 1MW E-Cat plant during the year long test?
2. Have the electricity bills from the power company supplying power to the plant for the duration of the test been retained by the customer?
3. If so, are these bills available to Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat?
4. Are these bills included in the ERV report?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If you do not already know, I would like to lead your attention to Mats Lewan's initiative "join force to bring out the truth on Rossi-IH affair".
There Mats Lewan and some other commentators try to clean up the mess, to loosen knots and I have learned many new things and got a better understanding of some relationships and last but not least it is exciting to read.
Best regards
Felix Rends
German Moderator http://www.lenr-forum.com
Dear Mr. Rossi
No, I did not speak of bombs and rabbits. My original post:
Dear Mr. Rossi
You wrote:
"I am confused: IH says my plant is worth nothing…but: to fight against something that is worth nothing, do you need the most powerful Law Firm of the world ?…"
Please be aware of the 87,000,000 reasons IH has to do it.
Andrea I'm just finishing Jane Mayer's new book, "Dark Money"; with all the troubles IH is presenting now I wonder if the Oil Oligarcy is cleverly funding them? Please have your legal staff review her book if you also have no time. Charles Koch the right wing billionaire is also Chemical engineer; funds many things demise that he does not control or own! Please be careful our legal system can be a problem with the Dark Money people conniving without our knowledge! Their economic resources are beyond belief; their action loaded with greed!
You friend and ally Jim
Mr Rossi:
The reason why IH is shooting an atomic bomb is that 89,000,000 $ are not a rabbit.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I want to clarify my previous post.
When David beat Goliath, he realized that the fight was not fair. So, he cheated and used a rock and a sling. That is how he managed to slay Goliath.
If you think that the fight is fair, I am afraid you might lose.
Faithfully yours
Rip Van Winkle
E' un momento difficile.
Certo, esistono le sentenze per difendere la propria buonafede ma forse, adesso, dovrebbe anche cercare l'appoggio della gente comune che non aspetta le sentenze ma si "accontenta" di cio' che i media/internet gli servono, purtroppo non si vince solo nei tribunali. Perché non organizzare, magari presso una università, una dimostrazione dell'Ecatx? So che é contrario, ma adesso forse é il momento giusto.
It 'a difficult moment.
Sure, there are judgments to defend their good faith but maybe, now, should also seek the support of ordinary people who do not expect the sentences but are "satisfied" of what 'the media / internet serve him, unfortunately do not win only in the courts. Why not organize, maybe it took a university, a Ecatx demonstration? I know it is not, but perhaps now is the right time
(ps: se la traduzione é errata (Google) é autorizzata a corregere gli strafalcioni)
Pietro F.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You have already been framed by the maffia once. Do you realize that you are up against a global much more powerful maffia this time?
Faithfully yours
Rip Van Winkle
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I hope your E-Cats will arrive also in Russia.
Dear Dr Irina Uzikova and Dr Vitaly Uzikov:
Can you send an offer for the supply of one plant able to treat 100 kg/h of low level radioactive wastes ?
We can be interested to buy a plant to be installed in Europe.
Please let us know:
1- the address to send our request to
2- if you prefer to sell the know how or the plant
DR Rossi Sir,
It appears that Industrial heat after reading the link below has hired a
massive law firm to silence the E-CAT, Jones Day has 2,500 attorneys and
this is unprecedented.
There are at least 5 people presently that I am personally aware of collecting
data and writing books on this saga.
expect the movie to be as interesting.
Dr Rossi,
By Law ** Industrial Heat must have communicated their problems to investors.
"The standard of an established firm (IH) that knows or suspects a problem —
e.g., the prospects for the product or the company are at risk in any
way greater than disclosed in the prospectus — it has to tell potential investors."
Woodward Fund was advised that their 50 million was at risk with the ecat generator
that did not work and Woodward did not disclose this to its investors ?
it would appear that Industrial Heat has promoted gross misrepresentations if your
ecat does not work, but, on the contrary, Tom Darden said publicly that the test was going well and he collected 50 millions during the test from Woodford.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you give us a resume of the reasons why Leonardo Corporation and IH have chosen the ERV that directed the one year test ?
Thank you,
seen on ECW:
This has all the hallmarks of a genuine fight. I think IH has been extremely inconsistent in the positions that they have taken. They have a lot of explaining to do in my book. As others have pointed out, there might be larger interests at stake, which might be distorting this whole affair.
Dr Rossi,
I seen this very interesting description of what is happening with you and Industrial Heat.
Dear Andrea,
I know you may not be explicit, for obvious reasons, but I would like your own assessment in points of my analysis:
By using the "Occam's razor" (If factors being equal the simplest explanation is to be preferred)
1) if IH so sure to be in the right, then it is foolish one big law firm (which will cost many thousands of $)
2) if e-cat is "false", then IH has had years to know (and to make everybody known)
3) if the Penon report is "false", then IH was holding everything to try it in a short time. Without lawyers.
4) If Rossi is right, then he's got a head-start and IH wants to eliminate it (discrediting Rossi for the time sufficient to act alone)
In general for LENR, for Rossi, for all those who work for a new energy to the world, two questions:
5) A new form of energy, clean and cheap, necessarily represents a huge breakthrough in the political, economic, environmental, historical, mental, psychological. It creates terror among those who want to direct everything. Although it is absolutely necessary, as not to expect problems?
6) Can "the common man" (not tied to regimes or interests) win?
This is a great test for democracy and for freedom
thx in advance
Dear Dr Rossi,
This will go down as one of the largest Corporate scandals in history where
Industrial Heat set up elaborate systems to lie and get around your patents
in order to trick you in to believing you were a real partner to acquire your
intellectual property
Then after raising millions in funds from multiple sophisticated investors including
Woodward Fund demonstrating your ECat now Tom Darden and Industrial Heat say it does
the ECAT does not work.
Really Darden's behavior as similar to a ponzi scheme, collect the money then come
out with a new product.
Dr Rossi You will prevail in court and Industrial Heat and partners will go live in shame
and disgrace.
Dear Andrea,
A short look today to the rather troubled world of LENR:
Best regards,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the comment of H: the truth is emerging, IH is just trying not to pay you after stealing your technology. They are running all around the world to slander you because they have not real evidence against you, otherwise they'd save money and just wait the hearings in front of the Court. They act like door to door pottery sellers,
with or without their powerful puppets.
You will win, because you are a true worker, they are..I stil did not understand what they are.
The important for us is that you work in peace, as you said.
Dear Dr Rossi:
This is big.
Read carefully, because gives evidence of the fraud made by IH.
Mr John Dewey Weaver, CEO of the venture capital group " Deep River Venture", in Raleigh, North Carolina, is going around the world to inform everybody that the test on the 1 MW plant has been not valid and that your process does not work, and is making this with gusto. But I know him, and I want you to know this: Deep River Venture" has been an empty shell from July 7 2012 to May 6 2015. In this year Mr John D. Weaver, old friend of Tom Darden, has collected money from investors to put it in IH Holdings International Ltd, wherein also Woodford has put 50 millions. All this money had to be collected to buy your IP, that was very hot, with the test on course of the 1 MW Plant, that Tom Darden promoted everywhere as a fantastic test, in conferences he made in US, in China. But that money has taken other directions; in fact, IH International Holdings Limited from the beginning knew that they were not going to pay you, even if, to convince their investors to give them the money, they were saying that the test on the 1 MW plant was stellar ( see the report of the conferences and interviews made in the USA,China, Italy by Darden ). For this reason, they started to buy patents and IP around the world, paying them few hundred thousands of dollars, plus MILLIONS in shares that are worth nothing, because all that IP they bought around the world is made by things that never worked: revoked or rejected patents or patents on things of small value, among which a printer; I should be very curious to know how the "fair value" of such shares has been certified…
It is clear that guys like John D. Weaver are just puppets of Darden, used to collect money: the "Deep River Venture" of Raleigh, NC, is a company that has a turn over of 88 000 $: which weight can it have in a concern that Woodford structured with 50 million $ ??? So, why he is spending so much time to travel around all the world to slander you ?
We are sending you evidence of what I wrote here.
The next gift will be the presentation of the real nature of the "PhD" : I tell you: it will be fun!
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain us or anticipate what will happen during the hearings in Court ?
Dear Dr Rossi
Kindly note this article posted on the MIT Technology Review website which discusses recent work in the area of 3D printing of Ceramic materials which may (or may not) have relevance for novel E-Cat reactor designs. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601245/new-3-d-printing-technique-makes-ceramic-parts/
Dear Andrea,
can you at least tell us how the report is structured, how many pages it is?
Thanks in advance
Stefania Conti
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Have you submitted the spent fuel contents for isotopic examination?
If an isotope examination was attempted, will it include the measurement the relative isotope ratios for hydrogen and helium?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
What do you consider an adequate eCat R&D test period:
1. What number of experiments?
2. What duration (i.e., number of days)?
3. Until no more anomalies have been observed and engineering changes are no longer required?
4. Until a long-duration experiment yields certain COP objectives?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Are you continuing to work on the E-Cat even in the middle of this mess with your enemies ?
Dear Dr Rossi,
Again Davide against Golia …
We know that the ECat can put in danger all the power structures that are deeply connected with the centralized production of energy, and I suspect that the world is much more controlled at a higher level than we are used to think…
Do not know if it can be of help, but when Edward Snowden did what he did, and he changed the world much less than the ecat can do, he went to China and Russia …. May this powers be of help also for you?… Just a possibility…
Davide won Golia…
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
Alessandro – ecatnews.it
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How has the work of Dr. Norman D. Cook been progressing on developing the theorems and scientific principles that are the foundations of the "Rossi Effect"?
Does Patent Law, or do restrictions imposed by the litigation now underway in Florida Federal Court, impact on what Prof. Cook can say or publish about this effect? That is, he may say that it depends on known Physics principles A & B, and Theorems C & D, but you need the rest of the alphabet – and several other alphabets – for the details.
Alphabetagamma regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
First I wish you all the strength and succes with the lawsuit with IH!
Some questions, if I may:
1. Do you need to offer a lot of your time to the lawsuit with IH, or can you nearly undisturbed work on you R&D?
2. Do you progress on building factories for the production of E-cat's (and/or QuarkX's)?
3. Are you happy with your progress on the QuarkX/turbine combination?
4a. When will you deliver your first commercial E-cat?
4b. What type will it be?
4c. What power level will it have?
4d. Would you be able to inform us about its performance/customer satisfaction once and a while?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Have just published the interview notes and info:
Very interesting Bazhutov's Russian E-Cat demo.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I understand that to invest in your technology is a great risk, but I like the risk. How can I invest in your E-Cat ?
I can sign a disclaimer accepting any risk.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Who is H ?
I am very intrigued about what he said.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
How is going today your R&D with the QuarkX?
Thank you for your great work,
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I appreciated the fresh air from Francesco Celani. About fresh air: we, your followers, are preparing a nice surprise for the "pure scientists" that are attacking you and that tried to stop your work the dirt way, in close contact with the snakes.
You do not know us, but we are strongly taking your back against this dark work. You will get fun, stay tuned, because we discovered very well who they are, how they make money, why they want your death.
You are working hard for all of us, and at the same time you are making a duel, David against Goliath; Goliath has put hidden men to shoot at your back during the duel, but there we are too, and we discovered anything of them. Next week there will be fun in the blogosphere.
You think how to work for us, we think how to defend you.
Godspeed, Andrea! Never give up !
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I wish more scientists would welcome your great progress instead of spreading false information and perform obvious acts of jealousy.
"If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!"
With all these gossip mongers and small minded people around, it was a breath of fresh air to read Prof. Celani's appreciated words about your achievement.
"Dear Andrea Rossi and Colleagues,
I am really happy about the positive results of such, extremely long, test.
My CONGRATULATIONS to Andrea: he was the real winner of 27 years long battle.
My opinion is that, if all will go "well", our world will change quite quickly.
The direction of changing will depend on the "managing", in the very near future, such REVOLUTIONARY invention."
To your success!
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you have a licenced distributor/reseller for Leonardo Corporation's E-Cat products in Malta (Europe)? Do I contact the reseller or do I contact Leonardo Corporation directly for a 1 MW unit inquiry?
Many thanks,
Dear Andrea,
This Sunday isssue of my Blog:
is, unfortunately, missing the very spirit of Sunday.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
1- When the E.Cat QuarkX will go in commerce ?
2- When will it be possible for the public to invest in your activity ?
Dear Andrea,
I think that IH has invested into the Brillouin corp because of persuasions by Godes and McKubre of their work in LENR devices. Brillouin has a working agreement with a Chinese firm which may be connected to IH since they were promoting a cooperative effort last year. If IH has decided to go in the direction of Brillouin, they would do anything to slow down your entry into the market place.
Suspicious regards
Would it be possible for you to make & sell DIY demonstration "pellets" that would contain sealed powder (with heat sink?) that generates excess heat when heated? Something like 100W might be good for demo, and maybe more for DIY heating system.
Dear Dr Rossi:
One of your work's achievements, maybe not much appreciated by you, but recognized by all the main players in the field of LENR, is that thanks to your work LENR have raised the attention of economic giants like Bill Gates, Boeing, Airbus, etc etc, with a falldown of financing that has resuscitated a world of zombies ( as you defined it ) as the LENR world before your publications.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
There is around a rumor that during the test of the 1 MW E-Cat there was another ERV besides the official one: is that true ?
Dear Andrea,
Will the QuarkX go through a series of public tests as the E-Cat did, after the R&D on course will have been completed ?
Andrea Rossi,
Can you comment about the progress of the work by Dr. Norman D. Cook on the scientific/theoretical basis/(bases) of the Rossi Effect?
Extended regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Andrea Rossi:
What do you think of the replication on course of the so called "Rossi Effect" ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Somebody puts in discussion that you have 200 patents in preparation or pending.
Dear Andrea.
I recommend You to explore the possibilities to cooperate with the companies Alevo and Ormat. The three of You may be a perfect technologically match.
Best regards: Svein Henrik.
Dear Andrea Rossi
I thought you and those who follow your work might find this work on the new field of Teslaphoresis interesting and informative:
Kind Regards Ian Walker
Dr Rossi
How is going today your R&D work with the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
Just a bit of LENR info for today:
An Prize is given you from Australia
by Doug Marker.
Really best wishes,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I as Chairman of Organizing Committee of the Conference is pleased to invite you to attend the Conference (RCCNT&BL-23).
The 23d Russian Conference on Cold Nuclear Transmutation and Ball-Lightning (RCCNT&BL-23) is to be held during June 19–25, 2016. The place of the Conference is Olympic (Dagomys) Hotel in the city of Sochi that is the best recreation and holiday place on the Black See shore of Russia.
The program of the Conference includes the following subjects:
• Experimental research in Cold Nuclear Transmutation and Ball-Lightning;
• Theoretical models with respect to Cold Nuclear Transmutation and
Ball-Lightning effects;
• Applied to these problems technologies and devices.
Best regards. See you in Sochi. (firstname.lastname@example.com)
Yury Bazhutov.
Dr Rossi, I am interested in reading what Woodford Fund told their investors about the 50+ millions they invested with Industrial Heat – Fund Managers must keep investors informed – it's the law and let's hear where Woodford stands on the original investment OR is it something else now, sounds like the Woodford board wants to make highly speculative investments on the back of their investors, after all Industrial Heat says the ecat does not work.
Where is Woodfords Response to this?
Why the delay in responding to investors?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Woodford in February 2015 has spent 50 milions of their investors to buy shares of IH, based on the fact that at that time IH was the US licensee of Leonardo Corporation, which means the E-Cat. Now it turns out that that money has not been spent to buy the license of Leonardo and you filed a suit for fraud against IH, Cherokee et al. asking the fevoke of the license because they did not pay you. In change, the Woodford investors can get solace from the fact that IH has bought other patents from your competitors, but all the new IP of IH is made of revoked patents ( e.g. Piantelli) or patents related to electrolysis, obsolete control systems, copy machines and other stuff of this kind, practically useful for nothing. Curious to note that most of this "IP" has been paid in shares, which leaves open a question: who calculated a so friendly "fair value" and where is finished the real money paid by the investors? We are talking of 50 million dollars, paid from Woodford to IH after the visit of their men in your 1 MW E-Cat plant in operation in the factory of the customer.
What do you think?
Andrea Rossi:
I have a hard time believing that after all this time that what you are claiming is not real. How long did it take the world to finally admit that Pons and Fleismen actually new what they were doing and spoke the truth.
The world is so much in need of such a clean/cheap source of energy. It will make the greening of the deserts possible and clean water available to those who have none. And this is just the beginning of the possibilities. Energy will no longer be the limiting factor to all that we do. Transportation, space travel, you name it and it all changes for the better. It's time for us to retire the horse and buggy!
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Someone made a list of all your comments about the automated production line, staring from this one in 2012
Can you recap the history of this "promised land" and the reasons why are we still waiting for it?
Automated Regards
Dr Andrea Rossi:
What is your opinion about supersymmetry ?
Mr Andrea Rossi:
Are you worried of the reverse engineering that will be made on your E-Cat after the diffusion of this device ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going on your R&D with the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In your Team now is there any person that had worked with IH during the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat ?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
There are rumors that Leonardo Corp bought back most of the licences that had been sold in past. I spoke with a former licensee of Leonardo who told me that you bought back almost all the licences previously sold at the same price the licensees had paid to Leonardo, plus the 10% as a premium.
I have two questions, if you can answer, as the CEO of Leonardo Corp:
1- why the licences have been bought back ?
2- are those licences for sale to other licencees ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
Now being aware that Mats Lewan has canceled the Symposium, do you still intend to have a public meeting and reveal or demonstrate something as you previously intended to?
If so, is a date or month and place planned for this?
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I am a high school student and also a follower of your work. My prof of Physics wants not to talk of LENR. What do you suggest me to do ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Dear Andrea,
You have said that you have many back orders of industrial plants, but how many companies/organizations are you actively working with to build and deliver plants for?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
I have published this
Now I see it was too optimistic and nice
the situation is more messy.
Dear Dr Rossi:
I agree with all that Jack said.
Dear Andrea,
Perhaps this has already been called to your attention.
Monday 4-11-16 on LENR-FORUM a member, me356, posted a link to a short video (page 38 of me356: Reactor Parameters thread) showing apparent excess heat being triggered. It appears to be a very good replication of the Lugano Hot Cat. On 4-12-16 (Page 42 of that thread) another member, BEC (Brillouin Energy), is trying to pump more info from me356 as to the trigger method. This seems to agree with your statement of IH giving away your IP but it seems that their "experts in the art" are having difficulty in obtaining desirable results.
Here is a paintbrush, here is some paint, here is a pallet to mix them like so and you get these colors. Stroke the brush to the canvas like so to get this line. Modulate the brush to get the appearance of curly hair. But still their picture does not resemble a Rembrandt. Keep your cards close to your chest Andrea! No comment necessary. There are a lot of eyes watching your back my friend.
Dear Andrea:
Jack is right, from the first to the last word.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
At the beginning I was convinced you were wrong and IH was right, but after reading all the rants of Jed Rothwell and the other hatchet men of IH and looked through the papers that have been published in the internet, I changed idea. You are right in the dispute against IH.
What convinced me is a foundamental thing. While IH was raising 50 millions from Woodford ( whose role has to be analyzed carefully ) JT Vaughn, in the same very days was writing to the authorities that your plant was not working and used a physicist connected with your competitors to induce the healthcare dept. of Florida to close your plant and interrupt the test. This fact, easy to understand reading carefully all the papers in the internet, clearly discloses the strategy of IH: use you to collect millions from investors, but, at the same time, stop you to forbid you to complete the test, so that they can avoid to pay you. Their strategy was, and is, to justify with their investors saying they are collecting money for an R&D that will never end…and block any factual development of your E-Cat, at the same time buying toilet papers to show to the investors ( and the auditors of Woodford and company ) that they have a lot of IP at the stake and that you are only one piece of the mosaic; this way they justify with the investors that they got 50 millions and eventually lost your license , which initialy was the pillar of their value.
From one side we have a man that has worked 16-18 hours per day, risking his health while making the Guinea pig, putting all his life in this risky endevour, on the other side we have financial smartasses that without working got 50 millions, or more, from Woodford, started a 200 milions concern in China, and at the same time tried to "kill" you: look at what JT Vaughn said to the North Carilina healthcare authority exactly while he was colecting 50 millions from Woodford. Why ? Because they never wanted a real work done, they always wanted only sell toilet paper to make easy money.
I was an enemy of you, Dr Rossi, but Rothwell and his paid armada of hatchets has convinced me that you are fighting against sharks to defend a work you have dedicated your life to. This having been said, now do not lose time in chatters with these assholes, continue to focus on your work and put the E-Cat on the market. This is the sole way you have to sweep away this trash.
An admirer of your efforts,
May God help you
Dr Rossi:
Do you think at this point the public could invest in your enterprise ?
Dear Mr. Rossi,
At the start of your polemic court proceedings with IH I proffered my absolute backing for your cause as I was convinced of not only your honesty, but hard work and integrity as it seemed to me by all your opinions and actions during the past few years that I have been following you. Since then I have been quietly reading the arguments for and against you from different blogs and articles and I have come to the conclusion that I was 100% correct in my assessment of you as a person, businessman and inventor, your extraordinary character and willpower under the tremendous pressure is admirable!
I won't ask you to keep up the battle, as I know you will, until the end.
With my best wishes
Luis Navarro
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I would like to have signed from you by copy of Mats Lewan's book "An inpossible invention".
Is it possible?
Dr. Rossi: You know better than I do, because of our past discussions on the subject, that thousands of lives are at stake for every month your E-Cat is held from the market place. I also am convinced you are a sincere humanitarian, so, for you to say "let in peace our pioneer-Customer(s)", when words from these customers can end the debate about the reality of LENR and your E-cat; respectfully, to me does not make sense. You have many orders for your E-cats, isn't it possible for you to find a customer who is willing and able to verify publicly the economic value of your E-Cats? Thanks for listening.
Dear Andrea,
I think at some point your technology will get the interest of government inspectors, with or without the encouragement of your opponents. Don't you think it would be good to establish the safety of the E-Cat for the governments and people of the world? I thinkt this would help quiet any fears about technology and help with worldwide acceptance.
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
a small contribution to the developing LENR Geography and exploration:
Dear Andrea,
Are you in the process of constructing devices for any other customers? I think you stated in the past that you have billions of dollars of pre-orders that are awaiting an offer.
Preordered regards.
Dear dr. Rossi,
As I was very busy, I didn't follow the JNP for a while, but today I've read Mats Lewan post, and I tend to believe that you're right. The fact that IH also tried to work with your competitors, spending money on them (instead of paying you for your hard work), makes me believe that they wanted to take over your IP and your business, and I wish you success in fighting against this.
Kind Regards,
Daniel De Caluwé
Dear Andrea Rossi
Like many I am saddened that the matters with IH have to be resolved in court.
I commend your fortitude and determination. As you have said, the enterprise is at this stage of development a warship not a cruise ship.
That description is meaningful.
I have one question about the Leonardo Corp. offering to supply heat under contract. If you have this information, can you publish a figure (or figures)for how many lineal feet of two lane roadway, the the 10 MW heat plant can keep clear of ice and snow in the U.S.during a winter?
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
you wrote:
" Andrea Rossi
April 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM
No: the e.p. they are looking for, and the effects they are looking for demand energies so high that I think no practical use of them will ever be made. "
I think there is a lot of stockpiled radioactive waste to be neutralized. R&D should go on. For all next generations.
Unless you mean by this answer that you have found a way to use the E-Cat technology to modify radioactive products.
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
1) You don't need to feel obligated to provide precise characteristics of the E-Cat X (or Quark). A rough preliminary summary, subject to change, would be extremely welcome! Would you be willing to give out a description that doesn't include performance metrics?
2) You have several other patents pending in addition to the granted patent, "Fluid Heater." Have you been given any indication by your patent attorney or the patent office how soon these patents may be granted?
3) I've been doing additional reading on hydrogen loading in the past week and have a ton of concepts bouncing around in my head: Van der Waals forces at the surface, interstitial sites between atoms in the nickel lattice, a-phase & b-phase loading, the creation of elastic tension by hydrogen atoms in the lattice, micro-void formation where re-formation of atomic hydrogen to molecular hydrogen can occur, extensive surface modification resulting in cracks and micro-cavities, and how pressure and temperature play a part in all of this. You were very correct that there was not one exhaustive text on the loading of hydrogen into nickel powder. But there is a good bit of information out there scattered about in various papers. Do you have any thoughts in general about this topic you can share?
4) Since you cannot provide the ERV report at this time, is there anyway you could publish your own data that was collected and the figures you derived?
5) Have you ever mechanically created a hole, pore, or cavity on a sample of nickel and then successfully induced a nuclear reaction at the location?
6) Has Industrial Heat observed self-sustaining behavior from the E-Cat replications they built themselves?
7) Have you directly measured an alpha particle flux with a charged particle detector from an E-Cat in operation? If so, can you describe what you detected? Second only to self sustained heat production, I think this would be absolute, beyond refutable evidence that could be used in court. Of course if the alphas are thermalized mostly in the micro-cavities, they might not escape to then penetrate through a small aperture in the reactor.
8) A long time ago you mentioned that you might in the future release images/video of the massive melt down of a reactor that produced a megawatt of power for ten seconds which melted ceramic. The video could be a morale booster from some of your supporters whom are having brain splitting headaches right now. Would you consider releasing it?
Thank you for your time and continued willingness to move forward to commercialize this technology.
Dr. Rossi: In response to my question about the customer of year long test, you said, "a company cannot be happy of all the blogosphere hurricane around this issue." This customer could be so important to the future of LENR because of the attention drawn to the yearlong test, there must be some incentive you or we could give him to come forward and talk about the economic value, cost savings, of your E-Cats. I think you underestimate your power of persuasion, and maybe the importance of this issue. I know you are busy, but please re-think above. Thanks for answering our questions.
Dear Dr Rossi:
There are so many people following your story, cheering for you, supporting you, praing for you, and yet the only thing you have given back in these last years are some 'Rossi says' that most of the time are followed by 'someone says not ' . And I mean.. you don't owe them anyhing, you are not supposed to satisfy the general public curiosity just in exchange of some sort of cybernetic support. But seriously, we are not talking about telenovelas curiosity, we are talking about people worried about the future of energy, the future of this planet, the future of their children, because hey, don't try to give me the 'all energy sources will be integrated' joke, your tech. is kind of last hope.
And I understand your worries about the competition, I understand the very long time needed to a such unconventional tech to be developed properly.
But there are soooo many ways you could put an end to the skeptics chatters, that you could prove without any doubt that your tech does what 'Rossi says' . And yet you don't do it.
Once again it's just Secret customers secret deals, secret results of reports..
You are a good man I'm sure of that. Just think that it would cost you nothing to give something back to those that have been defending your name for this long time
Hello Mr Rossi,
regarding the eCat delivery of heat: no señor – it is not that simple.
i am afraid that the 'National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors' might have a different opinion about this.
you must not take those safety topics lightly – it may fall on your feet…
Hello Mr. Rossi,
browsing the eCat website for some new photos i found the Leonardo offer for just heat.
That is a clever concept, i assume there are a lot of applications where heating is only required during winter season.
And it provides a low threshold to become friend with such a new technology – instead of buying something 'unknown' one can rent it for 6 months and then decide to buy.
if someone is interested in just the generated heat – who is responsible for the safety aspects of a steam-generator ? Leonardo or the client ?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Do you already have pre-orders for industrial application of the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea:
Yes sir. I understand the need for the ERV contractually. But for us hoping for the brighter future that your tech brings the most important things are the facts. Happy customer, high cop, proof of process, and progress toward manufacturing are meaningful. The legal issues while now troublesome for you will soon be in the rear view mirror and you'll drag us all forward. The changes I envision are earth shattering. With cheap desalination the worry over drought and famine should evaporate. Without need for the costly infrastructure a manufacturing facility can be placed anywhere in the word and with vastly lower transportation cost it will be able to compete globally. The ecatx or quark coupled with the drive toward global wifi connectivity means a man can literally build a house anywhere in the world and live comfortably. Can you imagine the freedom of a self-driving electric car with unlimited range? I could load the family up on a Friday night and wake up in New Orleans on a day trip and wake up at home Sunday in time for church. I'm so eager for my son to have this future and your helping us get there.
Good luck and thank you.
John C Evans
Dear Andrea,
A few questions about the new plant sales, if you don't mind:
1. Where will they be installed ?
2. You mentioned many problems needed repairing during the 1 year test — do you expect these to have been resolved in the new plants?
3. Will these plants be low-temperature thermal E-Cats, or QuarkX?
4. What is the cost for a 1MW plant now?
5. Will a Leonardo staff member be on site to provide engineering support?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I hope your journey into the unknown does not end as tragically as that of Odysseus, because then, as now, only for a very few people is the pursuit of virtue and knowledge the motivation and the goal of their actions.
Take care of yourself, your team and your project!
Best regards
Felix Rends
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think that the research on course at Geneva, in the CERN LHC can give information useful to the Rossi Effect, sooner or later ?
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on 3 more orders of the plant. The customer must be satisfied. When do you think Leonardo Corporation can deliver these plants to the customer?
Warm regards
Dr Andrea Rossi
What's you estimation of the time it will take for building, shipping and installing the 3 plants at the customer's facilities? Is it doable before the end of the year or much sooner?
my regards
Dear Andrea,
I have an idea, maybe a crazy idea…
Can you offer a substantial discount to JM products on the 3 new Ecats if He agrees to put on his site a recap of the total enery bills before and after ECat? If this is possible and JM products agrees, you can share with us and the world the link to his web site and this could be a very good advertising…
What do you think?
Regards, Marco.
Dear Andrea Rossi, I hope the same destiny for you!
Wow the Italian genius from the garage to Obama
Washington Summit on nuclear safety organized by the White House, a Paduan engineer, Adrian Marin, 52, presents its revolutionary patent, a machine that is capable of purifying radioactive waste in 'water. His company, the Wow Technology of Padua has won a major tender to run in South Carolina an innovative process of decontamination of liquid radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. The Wow has indeed won the tender "2016 International Projects" launched by the US Department of Energy.
How did the idea come to Marin? He is working in his garage, with a "piñata" for water purification experiments. There the flash of genius: the process, unique in the world, it works like a magnet that attracts the separated waste water that eventually becomes drinking. In his process of purification there is no entrainment of particles, as in the other existing filters on the market, but attraction towards one pole! And then the water is separated almost "naturally" from the dross! The process has been tested for five years in Saluggia, Vercelli, where the deposit of nuclear waste and where Avogadro Wow was tested on a sample of water 76,000 times more radioactive than that of Fukushima. And now Obama and his Energy Ministry entrusted him with a job. (thanks to Andrea Rampado)
Clear regards
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on your recent sales of 3 1MW plants. Can you tell us if it's for the actual plant or the heat produced by them?
Thank you and wishing you continued success…
Peter Metz
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that, thoeretically, the so called Rossi Effect could also not to be connected with LENR ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I tink that at this point there is no more to talk of tests, measurements etc, but only of E-Cats in the market.
Dear Andrea:
Per your response to D; If the customer had an 83% or greater reduction in energy cost for the heat supplied by the e-cat that equals COP≥6, who needs the ERV? If they are happy that's all that matters. Even if it was less but still COP>1 that's proof of the effect and should silence doubters. Thanks for the insight.
Good luck and thank you.
John C Evans
Dr Andrea Rossi:
When the 1 MW E-Cat was in ssm the input of electric power was zero Wh/h ?
Thanks if you can answer,
Andrea Rossi
I want you to know I have been following you since 2011 and wish the best for you! If you would answer the following questions if you can, it would be appreciated.
1. Who paid the electricity bill for the e-cat during the 352 day test?
2. Was the amount of heat produced sufficient for the customers needs?
3. Was the customers need for heat approximately 1 MW? If no, what was the customers need?
4. Did the electricity bill correspond with measured performance of the e-cat?
Thank you for any answers you can share,
Andrea, have you seen this?
Cherokee and its 27 (!!!) business entities were investigated by the New Jersey Office of Inspector General in February 2008
"Cherokee-related firms and officers have contributed at least $267,600 to state legislative and political campaigns and at least $80,700 to federal candidates from New Jersey since 1999."
Dear Dr. Rossi
let's talk about a 6 kW electric power Quark installed in my apartment:
1) should it in any case be connected to the grid?
2) if yes, when 6 kW are not used, what happens? let's assume I am consuming only 4 kWh, the remainig 2 kWh are necessarily sent to the grid? (and therefore I need to set up up a contract with the distributor for he to buy my electricity)? Or Q is capable of modulating the production according to the need in any moment?
3) If not, will a normal car battery be enough to operate the Quark?
Waiting Q with impatience….
My best regards and simpathy
Dr Andrea Rossi
Did I understand well, that the E-Cat QuarkX will produce heat, light and electricity ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read from your enemies that they do not accept the results of the ERV because they have made different measures: but this is ridiculous, it is as if a team refuses the results recorded by the official referee because they have a personal referee that has measured differently !!!
Go ahead, Andrea, get rid of them and go on with the production of the E-Cat !
Dr. Rossi: We have agreed on one issue for five years. Happy customers will ultimately decide the fate of your new fire. That is why I do not understand why you cannot persuade the customer of the year long test to come forward and give his opinion of his savings using the E-Cats.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you report on the status of the robots used for production? Have any been delivered or set up?
Bernie Morrissey
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you working more now or when you were inside the plant during the 352 days test?
Just a curiosity,
Dear Andrea,
have published
with your kind answers.
I am asking:
what is more interesting technically than a catalyst?
Answer: an other, better catalyst.
For example an energy catalyst.
I define catalysis as synergy
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Somebody wrote that if the E-Cat really was making 1 MWh/h all people around would have been burnt or something.
Comments or are you gonna spam this ?
Dr Rossi,
Have you had an opportunity to read comments from blogger Sifferkoll.
Dear Andrea,
Can you tell us the address of the Customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat during the test ?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Since the 1 year test is over and the fuel changed, has any of the ash been analysed? If so, is it possibe to reveal the analysis?
Andrea Rossi, Koen Vandewalle:
In an earlier post, Koen Vandewalle asked "what percent of the 'Symphony' is produced directly in electricity".
Without giving a specific percentage: (other than 0 or 100%)
1: Does the 'Symphony' produce any of its electricity directly?
Or, in other words:
2: Does it produce all of its electricity indirectly?
3: Can the produced (or stored) electricity be used to support some of the input power requirements of the Symphony?
4: Have you finished a new "Unfinished Symphony"?
(Unfinished due to potential further improvements.)
Continuing regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I see how you are fighting like a lion against the behemoth Cherokee, that is moving all the power they have to try to steal your IP. This is a veritable Goliath against David duel…win for us, because we want the E-Cat manufactured and they want not to manufacture E-Cats, they want only to manufacture toilet paper, as you correctly say.
May God help you,
Dear Andrea,
Here is an article about how pinball machines were once illegal in New York City and how one man, overcoming the odds, performed a feat that legalized them.
You have performed an even more stunning feat with the 350 day test of 1MW plant. I'm eager for when the world can see the report so the Rossi Effect can receive the acknowledgement it deserves.
Hank Mills
Dear Mr. Rossi
The link http://www.leonardocorp1996.com does not work.
Try again. Or go directly to http://ecat.com/
Try, try again,
Joseph Fine
You has replied thus to one very recent question about the ERV test:
"The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode."
This basically says it all. There's no need to publish any ERV really
F8??? Could you you refresh me as to what F8 is to infer plz. I remembeer F9. Any other F*'s I should recall?
Dear Andrea Rossi
Let's talk of serious things.
After the results of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat are such plants for sale ? Where can we find the characteristics ? Are you already able to manufacture them, even if not in massive production ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
How many pages long is the ERV report and how many measured data points does it contain?
You can surely tell us that
Work hard and warm regards.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
Really ?
Anyway, the bottle is open.
Cheers !
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
Can you give an idea what % of the symphony is produced directly in Electricity?
C: F8, but I've seen mostly A and sometimes B for some time, while experimenting. It works very intermittent, and it is hard to predict.
D: We have to make a test in a container for at least one year.
Are there still ongoing experiments in order to generate thrust? Does this seem a fruitful branch for the future, or is it more a side effect?
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
this is about your shortest interview ever:
Looking toward the next interview.
Hello Mr Rossi,
now that the performance-test is over and the world knows the brave, secret customer, can you share some photos of the whole story ?
Something like 'making of' ??
Some sweating, clueless technicians during installation – some photos of Andrea Rossi and team with an Xmas-tree on the eCat – some humorless, sceptic looking safety-inspector before 'permit to operate' was granted – all these are quite interesting to the audience and would not interfere with the arm wrestling in court.
greetings from the other side of the atlantic
Dear Andrea:
We trust to what you said about the litigation, because what you say makes sense, what they say does not.
You will win and we will have the E-Cat. They are interested only to sell toilet paper in change of gold, you are struggling to make real things.
We trust in you.
Thank you for your hard work.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said a true thing: what will count will be only your products on the market.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Is still in good standing and promising the QuarkX ? This is more important than the IH saga.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I admit the following video inspired me to come up with the name "E-Cat Symphony".
What do you think of "Nora's" musical debut?
With Harmony,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi, This is a bit off topic but it's interesting I think:
I guess you have already seen the interesting news about a nano satellite laser sail project possibly getting to the nearest stars in 20 years? Amazing to think this might be possible some day.
Whilst looking at this I read another article on the same site about e-sail technology.
"This concept builds upon the electric sail invention of Dr. Pekka Janhunen of the Finnish Meteorological Institute"
It looks very interesting to me and if I'm not mistaken I think I have seen someone with that name post here from time to time.
I can't help dreaming of a not to distant future where all these ideas and your technology are integrated someday.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How will you defend yourself and the E-Cat from all the lies IH is diffusing through their hatchet men and their powerful press agency APCO international ?
Are they generating damages to you and the E-Cat perspectives ?
May God help you,
Dear Andrea
IH is orchestrating all their puppet-journalist to discredit you with a mountain of lies, but do not worry: we all have understood their fraud against you and their investors, who gave them real money to have in change toilet papers instead your intellectual property and your technology.
You will win because in front of God you are right, they are evil.
God bless you,
Dear Mr Rossi. I noticed that in almost every web site/forum where your lawsuit with IH is discussed, some impostors pop up to discredit you and your e-cat with disgusting sentences about you and your work. I am sure you are aware of such disgraceful individual(s) acting in a way aimed to cover lots of powerful and unmentionable interests. I assume that you don't care much but a small drop of water continuosly hitting a hard rock, can create some permanent damage at the end…
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You are inspiring all of us for the fight against people much more powerful than you, to defend your invention and its real development for the advantage of all of us.
Dear Andrea,
If I remember well you got the idea of the ECatX during the (very short) stop you had in your work inside the container due to an hernia. After the only one day of convalescence you started to conceive the ECatX that granted small size, longer ssm, higher COP and, after some experiments, direct production of electricity.
I'd like to ask you if IH agents, that was around you in these days, helped you in the construction of the ECatX too ? My concern is that also ECatX secret technology is now well known by IH. Is it possible ? Is it sure ? Is it impossible ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Hello dr . Rossi,
I am sending an interesting article that talks about you :
"The big question is, is this for real?
Some nuclear experts who have been following the E-Cat developments closely point out that Rossi has "something", for it is hard to believe that the inventor is so naive as to think he could sell a total dud for $ 100 million."
Dear Andrea,
Jed Rothwell alleges that there is a second ERV of the 1 year 1MW plat test and that his report draws an opposite conclusion to the the one from the ERV that you described.
Does this second ERV exist?
Best regards,
Dr. Rossi, you and your Readers may want to Google:
cold fusion business line
Scroll down and click on:
Cold fusion: This time for real ?
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
Dr Rossi
.. once and for all could you confirm this:
Industrial heat personnel – had a hand in building the 1MW pilot plant. That IH had "Their" people there everyday of the 350+ day test.
Thank You,
Susan Appleby
Dr Rossi,
A concise and fair report on the IH situation from the Falls Church Times in Virginia: https://fcnp.com/2016/04/11/peak-oil-crisis-bizarre-twist/
Best regards,
Jim T
A link from India. They talk about Andrea Rossi and the E-Cat
Italo R.
Dear Dt. Rossi,
It puzzles me that IH now disputes the performance of the e-cat.
Didn't T. Darden and JT Vaughn oversee the e-cat validation in your factory in Ferrara?
Dear Andrea
The temperature of the Web dispute is too high but it is a way to cool it down:
I hope it will be used:
Dear Dr . Rossi, about Dr. Fabio Penon ( the ERV ), let me add that:
– he is registered in Italy to 'Order of Engineers of Padova' at No. 2311 in Section A ;
– his main field is that of testing and quality control of the industrial plants ;
Here is the link:
Dear Andrea
Would you consider this is a good summary of events?
The Peak Oil Crisis: A Bizarre Twist: https://fcnp.com/2016/04/11/peak-oil-crisis-bizarre-twist/
Once again I wish you successful and productive days.
John C Evans
Dr Rossi:
I read all the lies of Darden and of his hatchets of APCO are diffusing about the ERV and the plant. Their lies shine for their total lack of common sense: they say the ERV was not good, and they have chosen him, they say the measurements have not been good, and they had one full year to say this during the test, but said nothing, realizing the soure of their critiques only after receiving the bill, they say they did not replicate, but they got hundreds of millions of dollars bringing visitors to the plant where you were losing your health working 16-18 hours per day: IH stinks.
Never give up, Andrea, a crowd of followers will sustain you.
Dear Dr Rossi
I feel bad that your dealings with IH are ending up in court. There are many interests that will work to prevent you from bringing your technology to the world. I didn't think IH was one of those. Greed, corruption, and control will get to some of the best. I pray you have protected yourself enough to overcome your battles ahead. My hope for today is that you have chosen your attorney with the greatest care. Best wishes for all you do.
Dear Andrea,
After the extensive questioning from Soky, there can only be one conclusion why IH is challenging your IP and honesty. It is a shame of your science that you withheld and neglected to include within the IP and patent the key component, your stethoscope.
However, I still respect you once you amend your ways,
Dr Andrea Rossi,
If the domestic E-Cat will go in production (F8) will be possible a remote control of it ?
Thank you,
Dr Andrea Rossi
Can we have the following information about the ERV that made the report:
1- education
2- has he been chosen and agreed upon by both Industrial Heat and Leonardo Corporation ?
3- has IH been able to talk with him for any complint for all the 1 year long test ?
4- has the ERV experience in plants that produce steam ?
5- has the ERV experience of nuclear reactions ?
6- who paid the ERV ?
7- has he experience of validations ?
8- how old is he ?
9- whose were the instruments he used to make the measurements ?
10- who installed the measurement instruments ?
11- did IH participate to the choice where to install the instruments ?
12- did IH maintain his personnel in the plant during all the days of the test ?
13- did IH have the right and the possibility to contact the ERV for delucidations along all the test period ?
14- is it true that IH visited multiple times the plant in operation with their investors ?
15- is it true that they collected 50 million dollars from Woodford funds and initiated a 200 million business in China after theyr delegations visited the plant in operation ?
16- is it true that during the visit IH made also their investors talk with the director of the factory of the Customer during their visits, after which the investors gave them the money to be invested ?
Thank you very much if you can answer: your answer will clear a situation after Mr Darden has diffused information based on which IH was totally unaware of the fact that there was a test on course based on the agreement.
Dear Andrea,
Are you sure you do not need other investors, I mean professional investors ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am inspired from your courage: practically alone, against behemothes, in a business where you are circled by sharks. May the Force be with you.
Never give up, you have more followers than you think.
Dear Dr. Rossi, can you tell us the timing of mass producing of your first devices?
We are aware that the faster is the better. But how much time? Weeks, months?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the QuarkX today?
Dear Andrea,
In your opinion, what is the most authoritative text, paper, or document on the hydrogenation (hydrogen loading) of nickel?
Hank Mills
Dear Andrea Rossi,
There are multiple names that have been mentioned about the E- Cat such as 'New Fire', 'Hot Cat', 'QuarkX' etc.
I suggest the name E-Cat 'Symphony' since there are probably multiple effects going on simultaneously which are also time-varying (such as music).
Also, you could get different results or different 'sounds' depending on the "music" presented to the orchestra (design/preparations) and the skill of the Conductor and Control Systems designers/programmers.
Orchestrated regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Rossi,
Can you comment on this guess about the E-Cat:
A. 24-hour test: 1 x E-Cat = COP ~10
B. 1MW 352-day test: 1 x E-Cat as activator (mouse?) @ COP ~10 applied to 5 other E-Cats = COP ~50
Yes, but your answer speed may signify
your culture and education also
best regards
DrD you wrote.
>>>>In the IH patent that is being discussed I see nothing inventive<<<<<
I thing that Dr. A.Rossi patented new technology. But IH try to patent the machinery, 1MW E-Cat reactor, build according to instructions of MR. Rossi.
Maybe by this way they want to prevent Mr.Rossi to build and sale this kind of E-Cat reactors.
Can we have, when it is opportune to you, a photo of the factory where the mass production will take place, with robot machines in place or being installed?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
We already know that the one-year test on the 1MW e-cat has proven the technology, but we are still waiting for the official release of the ERV report. Is it's publication imminent, days or weeks away?
Although up to a few days ago we were saying that this is irrelevant to the roll out and commercialisation of the e-cat, since it's the market that proves the technology, now that IH has tried to derail the commercialisation progress, the ERV will give more power to your elbow.
How many engineers and scientists will be signing the report?
I wish you a 6-0, 6-0, 6-0 win against the bad guys.
Dear Mr. Rossi
I have to thank you since your story is a TV watcher time saving event,compared to "THE TWILIGHT ZONE", "007", "LOST", "DESPERATES HOUSEWIVES", etc…fictions.
I need half hour a day only whith your blog!
(publication expectation = 1%)
Best Regards
Dear Andrea,
In the IH patent that is being discussed I see nothing inventive. The only inventive step (the fuel) is already disclosed in your issued patent. What extra is described is well known to those skilled in the art.
This is very strange.
What is the purpose of such an application (Rhetorical question).
The experimental details are also very poor, making guesses and allowances for them. I trust the ERV was more precise.
Best Regards
Dear Andrea,
Till solid data will be available the info-war is too intense. See please
I made appeal to a friend who is calm, objective and wiser than me
Best wishes,
Dear Andrea
Thank you for what you have been able to share. I to find it interesting that IH would file a patent on a tech they consider failed.
Am I safe to assume that the certification for the quark is a safety certification like UL issues so that domestic operation of the unit won't make the homeowners insurance rates go through the roof.
Always remember when they cheat you and tell lies the best revenge is living well. Once again I wish you successful and productive days.
John C Evans
Dr Rossi,
Very best wishes for your success in this difficult situation!
1. Is now not a good time to demonstrate the E-Cat publicly and prove to the world LENR and the Rossi effect is 100% real?
2. If no, can you explain why a public demonstration is not possible or desirable now?
3. If yes, can you suggest a timeline for a public demonstration?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
since we have to expect discredit on the ecat ( that has already started) and the 'powers that be' will try to delay the mass production, I ask:
– When will Leonardo corp. be ready to receive orders ( i mean for the already tested 1MW power plant) and deliver in a few weeks?
– Is Leonardo corp already organized in this sense and ready or when it will be?
I think it is of great importance since from then all the discredits wil be of no importance.
Thank you and best regards,
Alessandro – Ecatnews.it
Dear Jeff Robs,
According to our estimations, the installation of such capacity would cost from 25 up to 50 thousand $
Best regards,
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Dear Andrea,
I wish you all the luck in court!!
1. Now you have lost your a major finance source for your exponential expansion, would it be an idea to do it by crowd funding?
2. You said, there is no need to wait until court decides. If I remember right, you are going to build your first E-cat manufacturing plant in the UK. This means that the first commercial products will be sold in Europe and not in the US as long as it runs for court?
3. Is there any chance that an independable group like MFMP gets the opportunity to test a QuarkX in the not so far future? (I am not sure if they want to though).
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi,
were you aware that the Securities and Exchange Commission Issued Administrative Ruling Against Cherokee Investment Partners ???
here is a link to Bloomberg Business News –
Kind Regards,
Janice Abrahams
Dear Andrea,
From what you have written, it sounds like the E-Cat X is under an extended test.
1. If this is correct, how long has the test been running so far?
2. At what point in testing will you be satisfied that the E-Cat X will be suitable to be used in a commercial product
3. What is your timeline goal for when will be able to demonstrate the E-Cat X to the public?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr Rossi,
Just seen this interesting response by Mr Ian Walker maybe you could post this:
Hi all
Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select, on which to base
their Due Diligence, for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access, they
were so happy with his work, and that of the team they selected and that they
agreed for him to run; that they spent $10 million dollars as a result.
There is no wiggle room with facts they are when all is said and done facts.
And it is fact that IH were happy enough with Fabio Penon's
qualifications, experience and abilities spend $10 million dollars on
using him as their source of adequate Due Diligence for buying the
E-Cat License and seeing the E-Cat IP.
IH could at any time in the past few years have asked for him to
replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so, ipso facto by IH's
own inaction he was IH's choice for the ERV and they were fully
satisfied with him.
Kind Regards walker