text:
Back to the most recent entries.
Comments to Webmaster
Dear Andrea,
what is your estimation about the construction of the X-Quarck, i mean how many hours or days will takes to make a single 100watt Quark module without cooler apparatus and energy converters. At list, are we talking about hours, days, weeks….
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Dr Rossi,
I realize that you have not fully researched the ability of the Quark-X to produce electricity so do you think that, at this point, its most efficient method of producing mechanical power would be via steam production?
Best regards,
Iggy Dalrymple
Dr Andrea:
Your answer to LookMoo today is a gold nuggett.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on your progress.
If you can answer them, I have a few questions.
1. What is your estimate of how many 1MW plant equivalents you will ship this year?
(Probably before automated assembly begins.)
2. What is your estimate of how many 1MW plant equivalents you will ship the first full year after automated assembly begins?
3. What is the maximum temperature that the Quark-X can maintain.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Fantastic answer to LookMoo.
You are always straight to the point, precise and base on facts your comments.
Dear Andrea,
This time I wote, with help from Edmund Storms about the Crisis and need to rethinking and re-definition
of the scientific branch of LENR:
There cannot be peace between the theorists
and between the theorists and reality
Dear Andrea:
Your answer to LookMoo is very convincing. The fact that IH received from the ERV one report every 3 months whose results were the same of the final report and they said nothing against the reports, but used them to get money from their investors speaks loud in your favour.
He He. Thanks Andrea for the tennis challenge. You make me wish I was in your neighborhood ;). But having read about your past supporting achievements I suspect you are very good at tennis too. I'm quite daunted about the idea of facing your legendary h-bar serves! The fact your wife is winning against you just shows very smart and skilled she is too. I suspect she has payed proper attention to your training and has worked out she can win against your h-bar serves by carefully Quantum Entangling your Tennis Rackets before the match!
My wife says there is always a very smart wife behind every and successful married man… Well mine is definetly much smarter than me so I hope I'm successful at something some day 😉
I have a cunning plan… Maybe if you swap the net with one with bigger holes in it you can tunnel the ball through it with out her noticing? 😉
Best Regards you both and all the best with your future tennis matches!
Dear Mr. Rossi,
In one of your replies you briefly mentioned that IH had guided tours with potential customers during the one year test of the 1 MW plant.
Can you tell us a little bit more about these happenings??
* How many guided tours
* When was the last guided tour by IH.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is still in good standing the QuarkX ?Still very promising the R&D with "her" ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the comment about the 157 scientists and the lie detector: real fun.
According to Google translate, "Jag bara undrar" is swedish and translates to: "I'm just wondering". Now all we have to do, is determine its significance!
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Fantastic answer to the comment of Alf Stokes.
The clowneries of IH are giving to us all evicence of the fact that you are right.
They hired a psychologist that prostitutes himself to try to say you are nuts to justify the fact that IH is not paying you. They simply stink.
This give evidence you are right. You will win, no doubt about that.
Dear Andrea,,
Our little but not so innocent joke -is revealed here:
Very sorry for your tennis defeat..
As a small compensation, you will win the trial,
@Brokeeper. Great find! I will be very careful around squirrels from now on.
This issue maybe bigger and more serious than we thought:I just found a link to this following article (initially mentioned on MFMP On their Facebook page). http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/29/476154494/weasel-shuts-down-world-s-most-powerful-particle-collider
@Andrea Rossi. Thanks for keeping your courage and focus. Your humor is great relief to us too. After reading your blog I'm thinking to take up tennis, I guess I will useless at it at first but with some effort and focus on my side I think it will be fun and good relief and great way to relax…. Just as long as no squirrels run off with the ball 😉
A song for you! (humor)
As I know you are interested in music . I am planning a holiday trip to Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Alabama to listen to live music . Which states do you prefer? Maybe you have any other suggestions? I really liked the film " The Concert "
Dear Andrea,
I just received this secret picture of what's powering IH's secret 1MW load. It may be a reason why they have not been able to replicate the customer's 1MW COP.
Please be careful not to fall for these squirrels' ploy to have you take, in secret, one of their truth tests from their secret lie detector.
Dear Mr Rossi,
I don't know if this information may be interesting for you (it concerns an improvement in the art of making batteries and this improvement has been make by mistake)
Have a good day and I hope you will win at tennis today!
Rémi André
Dear Andrea,
Latest from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
Excellent Geopolitical #LENR Analysis by Doug Marker
Posted on 2016/04/29
Enjoy your weekend and your tennis!
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I saw the comment of Alf Stokes : do not worry, Andrea: if IH uses these arguments, you have already won the litigation.
Dear Andrea,
Today I wrote:
I am very sorry that the analyst says bad things but this is his meaning.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for your continue struggle and focus to give us the E-Cat. What counts for us is not your litigation, what counts for us is that the E-Cat arrives to the market.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How is gone today the R&D on the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
EGO OUT for today, thinner than usual
is here:
It is War in LENR-land and somebody tries to put muzzles on the Muses.
Finmeccanica has rebranded as Leonardo. Looks like a name conflict with your enterprise.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said a wise thing. It is useless to talk about reciprocal accusations out fo the Court; only in Court every statement must be sustained with evidence, while out of the Court any stupidity becomes an issue.
Thank you for your focus on the great work,
Dear Andrea:
You have indicated that with the Quark-X each individual unit is small, and that whatever power level is needed can be achieved by aggregating multiple Quark-X units.
A) Can I assume that in a multiple unit module the individual units have to be separated from each other – perhaps in a honeycomb pattern – so that coolant can flow between the units?
B) Approximately what would be the size of a hypothetical one megawatt total power Quark-X module?
Thank you if you can answer.
Dear Andrea,
Please be careful with this new partner. We don't want another IH…
What precautions you will take?
P.S.: since now the ECat is hotter than never, you can replace warm regards, with hot regards, or at least warmer regards!
Best Regards,
@ Mike Henderson:
Andrea Rossi is right, your calculation is wrong.
In ballpark numbers, 1 gal of diesel fuel is equivalent to about 40 kWh of energy. Therefore 1 MWh is equivalent to about 25 gal.
It is not a big issue for an industrial production. Also assuming there was excess of heat, it can be dumped in many ways by an expert of the art.
I think we must respect the fact that the ERV is a nuclear engineer that worked in a nuclear plant: he surely knows how to make measurements of energy in a plant that makes steam.
Dear Andrea,
Please look up the latest on http://www.sifferkoll.se
#LENR #ECAT Saga: The Most Important Inconsistency by Dewey Weaver (so far)!
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In this period you have to work on the QuarkX, produce the 1 MW plants that have been ordered, sustain the huge attacks that IH has orchestrated against you. How can you sustain this pressing ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When do you think the fog in the field of the confrontation between you and IH will dissipate ?
Dr. Rossi,
Is mass production of the 1MW Plant for the European market going to start this summer? If not, when do you see it starting?
Warm regards,
1MW of steam carries the equivalent of 70 gallons/hr of diesel fuel. How was the energy output consumed? How was it measured? How was waste heat disposed? Wasn't it ferociously hot?
Best regards,
Do you thermalize gamma using lead?
Dear Andrea,
Have you tested yet any new 1MW low temperature plants, built since the one used in the year-long test?
If so, how has it performed (are problems resolved)?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea:
Somebody has written that Prof. Norman Cook is no more working with you on the theoretical issues related to the E- Cat: is that true?
Thank you
Dear Andrea,
Here is the LENR Info for today:
My best wishes,
Dear Andrea,
You say the customer for whom you will be doing the upcoming test "is a partner who could strongly speed up the development process". Does this mean that this potential partner could assist with production of E-Cats?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr.Rossi,
One year is a long time to run a continuous test on the 1MW E-Cat. You are very brave.
You said the 1MW E-Cat has been upgraded, "with many corrections due to the experience that has been made". Were there some elements that performed better than expectations and other parts that required a lot of attention? Can you tell us about any surprises and lessons learned?
Looking forward to seeing your products in our home.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dear Andrea,
You have indicated that you are preparing for a QuarX test with a European customer in June. You have also indicated that it will have a variety in output power and that it will produce electricity.
I hope you will be able to answer the following questions for us:
1. What will be the duration of that test?
2. Is it right to assume that it will be a multiple QuarX?
3. What will be the maximum power level?
4. Will also the heat production be measured, or just the electrical COP?
5. Will the results be published?
6. Will the customer also help you with sales and/or production if the tests are a success?
Many thanks,
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain why this test is so important, and why this customer is so important?
Many thanks,
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your answer. Is it possible to let Mats Lewan participate during this test (if he protects the identity of your customer)?
Best regards
J. Heisenberg
Dear Andrea,
Are there still any plans to hold a press conference in Stockholm in June, now that Mats Lewan's Symposium got cancelled? I got the impression that the two were separate events, even though in close vicinity.
Best Regards,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
We are taking notice of this fact: while IH is continuing to slander you and to try to make a process on the blogs instead of in Court, where it belongs, you are focusing on your work and are turning a blind eye to the useless chatters. That is good.
Will be public the test you will make in Europe in June ?
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your answer about the E-Cat QuarkX testing. Very interesting. Are you ready technically for this test? Is this test scheduled on the calendar, or is the timing dependent upon the state of your R&D?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Where will be made the important test of June for your Customer ? Will it be with the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
Does the test with the important customer in June involve the E-Cat QuarkX?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
.. seen on ECW
Good Question to ask Industrial Heat and Mr Weaver ( aka Tom Darden):
Stanny Demesmaker
"Do you really think that it takes 3 years to test a 10kW LENR reactor to know that it produces excess heat?"
..and I like to add: if so, why during this time you collected 150 million dollars from investors after inviting them to attend your own replications in your factory of Raleigh ? If the replications were no good, why did you ask 150 million dollars to the investors ? Please do not say that you had other better technologies for the investors, because at that time you did have only the intellectual property of Andrea Rossi ( let alone the fact that the other technologies that you bought later are worth nothing, as everybody knows… the sole prototype that worked is the hot cat of Brillouin that you made them copy from Rossi ).
Dear Andrea,
In your reply to Wayne, do you mean that you never reach energies low enough to participate in either nuclear resonances or electronic resonances? There may be energies produced in your process that could participate in interactions with possible available energy configurations to decrease its level since it appears you are somehow thermalising the energy.
Thermal regards
Dear Dr. Rossi,
We all look very forward to your success with the your customers.
Is it possible that I could become a customer?
I would like only to rent an E-Cat or Quark reactor for 2 weeks. I will pay $100,000 rental fee. I will return the device in original condition. I will not open the device to examine the fuel or its components. I will sign any NDA that is required. I will agree to operate the device with Leonardo Corp. supervision.
I only have one purpose for this rental: to test the real-world performance as a customer of the product. I will then report the performance to the public.
This seems to be the scenario you have asked for now for many years: you want the market will confirm the performance of the E-Cat. I am the market. I can pay $100,000 (for 2 weeks rental!). I can confirm the performance.
Is this is possible? Will you rent to me one E-Cat for $100,000 for 2 weeks? And please, how soon can you make the sale? I can purchase immediately.
If this is not possible, can you please explain to me why not?
Most respect and warm regards,
Your invention will upend global economics. Because of this, your computers are attractive targets for hackers. Have you discovered evidence of penetration? We would enjoy hearing about that. Stay secure.
Best regards,
Dr Rossi,
There is information that concerns you on this link at eCat World.
from Josh H – Cutting Through the Fog Surrounding the Rossi/IH Dispute
Confusion to your enemies
Dear Andrea is it possible to tell us something about this new customer or does he/she/it also want to be a "secret customer"?
Best regards
Dr Rossi:
The industrial plants you received the orders of will be substantially equal to the one that has been tested for 350 days ?
Dear Andrea:
Keep on working, great job!
We are tired to pull carts with square wheels ( ha,ha,ha ).
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think that resonances play a role in your effect ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Dear Andrea,
Battlefields in many places- today's contribution to them:
Best wishes,
PS If possible please publish Patrick Ellul's New Survey on JONP too! Thanks!
Dear Andrea,
You mention you have a test with a 'very important customer' in June. Is this the same, or different, customer that has already ordered the three E-Cat plants you have already announced?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Science prescribes that LENR must emit high energy gamma rays. Why the E-Cat does not ?
Dear Andrea
How is going on the work with the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The British Government has released a document in which they say they are briefing about your E-Cat, but they have not yes a position about it nor a connection with you.
Any comment ?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
When can customers #2 thru #10 expect to receive their plants?
Curiously yours,
Dear Andrea
New 10 second survey. Anonymous but requires you to log in to block spammers from multiple responses.
Survey Link: http://goo.gl/forms/V2AePjKRQy .
Live Results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G1qVrpDJkHz9zD03dJZ1xxiDDjDeUT-62l0ly4cWIfU/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
Dear Andrea,
This EGO OUT for today
Survey, critical comment and some info.
Best wishes,
Dear Mr. Rossi,
How many ABB robots have you ordered?
Dr Rossi,
There is a very interesting thread at ECW
Titled: Cutting through the Fog Surrounding the Rossi/IH Dispute (Josh G)
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I saw a recent photo of you: compared to the photos of you we saw one year ago, you appear 10 years older. It is impressing how much you consumed yourself in this year inside the 1 MW E-Cat. How is your health ? You are too important to us, everybody has understood that LENR without you are at zero level, with or without IH.
God bless you,
Dear Andrea,
Another post by Josh G today 26th April 2016 at 13.47 on Mats Lewan's blog
Josh G
April 26, 2016 at 13:47
@NCkhawk (alias John Dewey Weaver, III)
Instead of worrying about our credibility, as the managing director of an investment fund with investments in IH and as a business colleague of Darden (and representative of IH at the recent Airbus conference), you might try spending more time being worried about your own reputation as an honest and savvy businessman (assuming you do).
With all the FUD you and others are spreading around here, it's hard to cut through the thick layer of fog, but I will try.
Both you and IH have stated clearly and unequivocally that IH has never (not once!) been able to substantiate the E-cat produces excess heat. And yet despite this fact, IH/Darden:
1. Spent a good deal of manpower and money on R&D to develop and produce a new iteration of the e-cat, which they sent to Lugano for testing. If they had never gotten Rossi's older version of e-cat to work, why invest a dime in R&D on it?
2. If they never got an e-cat to work and didn't believe the Lugano results, why on Earth would they agree to give Rossi the go-ahead on the 1MW test? You say he insisted, so fine, maybe they couldn't stop him. But why would they willingly spend a dime of their own money to pay for (at least) 2 technicians (Fulvio plus another person you always conveniently forget to mention), as well as 1/2 the costs of the ERV plus who knows what other costs? How did Darden get so wealthy by being so willing to piss money down the drain? Maybe he didn't care because it was his investor's money. This shows very poor business acumen and an appalling carelessness with other people's money. You may think that Rossi's insistence on going ahead with the 1MW test under the circumstances makes him look bad. But if Darden thought the e-cat didn't work, his willingness to go along with the test AND fork over money for it makes him look like a chump and a pushover.
3. If they caught Penon and Rossi early on trying to engage in fraud by switching flowmeters, then why on Earth would they agree to continue the test? Why on Earth would IH continue a test (which they were paying for half of + personnel + who knows what else) when they had just caught Rossi and Penon red-handed trying to commit fraud?!? Does that count as due diligence where you come from? Again, you think it makes Rossi and Penon look bad, but it also makes Darden look like an easy mark. As our exalted former El Presidente George Bush the Younger once said, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice … you can't get fooled again!"
4. If they never got the e-cat to work, then they also had no reason to believe the 1MW plant would work. But according to Rossi (and apparently he can document this for the courts), IH had Woodford and the Chinese and who knows who else visit the 1MW plant as part of their effort to raise investment capital. We don't know at this point if the reason they invested in IH is because of the e-cat (though Woodford capital says they spent 2 1/2 years on due diligence, so we assume that was the primary reason they were investing, since that was IH's first investment). So what you're saying is that Darden had no reason to think the e-cat worked, but went about raising money for it anyway on the pretense that it worked? Do you realize that you're basically accusing your own friend and colleague of fraud?
5. And as others have pointed out, if they have no reason to think the e-cat works, then why file a patent on the e-cat claiming to get a COP of 11? Did they just make that up? Lawyers are expensive and filing patents costs a lot of money. Why would they pay all that money to file several patents if the technology is bunk?
So you see, the position you've staked out is full of inconsistencies and internal contradictions.
I don't know exactly when you learned of all these details or when you invested your clients' money in IH. But if you knew before you invested that IH had never gotten the e-cat to work, then it doesn't seem like you made a wise investment on your clients' behalf. Even if you believe in LENR's promise, based on all your claims, I honestly don't see how you can continue to have faith in Darden's business acumen and IH's competence. I do know that if you had invested MY money in IH and then came out and told me everything you've said on this blog, I would insist on getting my money back, and I'd never give you another dime. So you don't exactly come out of this with your reputation intact, either.
In the course of spewing FUD and trying to bully us into keeping our mouths shut, you've only succeeded in damaging your own reputation, as well as that of Darden and IH. You've dug yourselves into an enormous hole, and I don't see how you can emerge unscathed.
I doubt you'll respond to this. And if you do, I can't imagine you'll offer a thorough, logical response to explain all of IH/Darden's absurd and inexplicable actions in this case — because there is no way to logically explain them. I definitely expect more ad hominems against the 'Rossi faithful' and attempts to bully me and others into remaining silent to protect our reputations. Mr. Weaver, as much as I truly enjoy watching you embarrass yourself, at this point I really think you should take your own advice.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Does the Higgs field affect the E-Cat ?
Dear Andrea,
from previous Q&A:
1- Did you request copies of all the energy and water bills paid by the customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat ? Answer. yes.
2- are those bills coherent with the COP indicated in the Report ? Answer: yes.
Very important but, even more important: the cost saving is about 6 or near to 50?
Best regards,
Giuliano Bettini.
Dear AR,
I am shocked and disappointed at your treatment by IH et al.
I want you to be at your top level for your R&D work – the world needs it.
A few of questions, if I may:
1. Are any aspects of the E-Cat X to be incorporated into the new orders for your 1 MW plants?
2. Is at least one of these orders to be industrial plant you were hoping to deploy in the UK?
3. How is the progress on the jet engine application?
with many thanks,
Greg Leonard
Dear Andrea,
You will find below a post made this morning by Josh G in Mats Lewans blog http://www.AnimpossibleInvention.com
April 26, 2016 at 10:28
@nckhawk @Matslewan @Sifferkol
@nckhawk wrote: "It's interesting that one of Darden's companies cleans up toxic waste sites."
Yet Cherokee's investments in brownfield remediation are questionable and some mired in controversy and accusations of dirty dealing and poor management.
Mats, in the interest of "bringing out the truth" about Darden and Cherokee investment partners, a couple of of your readers in other threads have brought to our attention Cherokee's dirty dealings and questionable reputation. When Cherokee invested in IH/Leonardo/Rossi and Darden gave a speech at ICCF, we were all more of less convinced that Rossi had found a savior and that Cherokee and Darden –a savvy businessman — had the best interests of LENR and the planet at heart. Well, the links below strongly suggest that Cherokee and Darden are probably not what we thought, and I think it's an important piece of the puzzle in terms of bringing the truth to light. It might also be a productive avenue for an investigative journalist to pursue. What it shows me is that it was actually Rossi who didn't do enough due diligence on Cherokee.
[Compiled from posts by @Trump it and @Stephen Suriano on the 'alternative hypothesis' thread:]
Andy Willner, executive director of the NY-NJ Baykeeper, an environmental watchdog group, is waiting to see how successful the remediations are.
"The confluence between brownfield redevelopment and dredge disposal is certainly a niche Cherokee has taken advantage of," Willner said. "Give credit where credit is due: They've found a niche market and exploited it."
"Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, is skeptical. "I think, quite frankly, they are much better at playing politics than anything else," Tittel said. "If you look at the company and how they make their money, they don't build anything, clean up anything. . . . They just flip the property. They're like the middleman."
Cherokee-related firms and officers have contributed at least $267,600 to state legislative and political campaigns and at least $80,700 to federal candidates from New Jersey since 1999."
Here is a report from the State of New Jersey Office of the Inspector General and it details bad behavior and ineptitude by Cherokee and its shell corporations that is reminiscent to what see in this affair:
"In 2000, Cherokee managed two private equity funds, known as Cherokee Investment Partners Funds I and II (CIP I and CIP II). Cherokee subsequently created and undertook management of two additional private equity funds, Cherokee Investment Partners Funds III and IV (CIP III and CIP IV). The shareholders of the investment funds are primarily large pension funds. "
"The majority owner of EnCap is Cherokee Investment Partners (Cherokee) through one of its four investment funds, CIP II. Cherokee has registered at least 27 business entities in New Jersey including Cherokee North Arlington, LLC, Cherokee Porete, LLC, and Cherokee Porete Urban Renewal, LLC. "
"As discussed in Section III, after EnCap was awarded the project Cherokee Investment Partners II acquired a 65% ownership. "
"EnCap's main equity investor is Cherokee Investment Partners II (CIP II), which is managed by Cherokee Investment Partners (Cherokee) and has several affiliates and subsidiaries. Thomas Darden is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Cherokee"
"On April 25, 2002, Thomas Darden contributed $25,000 to the New Jersey Democratic State Committee; • On November 15, 2002, Darden contributed $3,000 to the New Jersey Republican State Committee; and • On April 23, 2004, Darden contributed $15, 000 to the New Jersey Democratic State Committee.
Encap won a contract in 2000 from the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission to cap and close four landfills in the Meadowlands and to sell the land for residential, commercial and recreational development, including golf courses. In December 2005, Encap received more than $300 million in publicly sponsored bond financing, including more than $200 million in loans from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Trust. Encap's project in the Meadowlands was the subject of a report by the New Jersey Office of Inspector General in February 2008. Encap filed for bankruptcy protection later in 2008 and did not complete the project.
Feb 2016
"Two closely affiliated companies that own the site of an idled urban redevelopment project in the Charleston Neck Area filed for bankruptcy Monday with the goal of selling most of the 182-acre property.
Bogged down by the last economic downturn and lengthy litigation, Ashley I LLC and Ashley II LLC sought protection from creditors in Columbia. Their debts total more than $23 million, with much of that owed to one lender, according to the filings."
"Ashley I and Ashley II, which began acquiring property in 2002, are owned by Raleigh-based Cherokee Investment Partners. Cherokee did not respond to requests for comment Monday
Dear Rossi,
Large Industry Robots projects usually takes 2 YEARs from order to operation (implementation/completion/production).
Assuming that this limitation also apply to you, is it not a better options to start a old fashion assembly line supported by subcontracts??
Such strategy distributed production will not only be faster but also address the issue with bottlenecks usually associated with large projects. And gradually introduced robot technology into the production.
Dear Andrea,
What can you tell us about the status of the Leonardo Corp's E-Cat production facility?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Today's issue of my Blog:
All the best,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Sorry for giving you just these links, too much to put the information in one sentence, but but they disclose that outgoing from Thomas Darden II a whole corporate network is acting to prevent your Ecat -Technology or to take it over …
… my questions to you is, are you personally and/or your lawyers aware of what is more or less obviously going on in the background? I cannot catch up the complete picture, but you know the people personally and have a better inside view, because for me it looks like that there is a huge multi level anti LENR Ecat campaign running to discredit you personally and your technology in general, including cyber attacks by professionals. Have you also had cyber attacks on your website and do you have the 'feeling' that 'powerful financial forces' are acting against you and your technology and last but not least, are you afraid?
Best regards and all the best to you!
Felix Rends – Moderator http://www.lenr-forum.com
Hello, Dr Rossi:
I am sending this update from animpossibleinvention
Dear Andrea,
Please read the following from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
#LENR #ECAT saga: Weaver goes Schizofrenic about Penon and Reveals a Goldmine of #Cryptodenialism to Study!
Best regards
Hello Andrea,
This is my current working hypothesis that I posted on Mats Lewan's forum.
I could be WRONG. I may very well be incorrect. But the following is what I've hypothesized from what I know.
That is a plausible hypothesis. I'll share my current working hypothesis with you. I could be wrong, and I hope I'm wrong. This hypothesis would mean that very powerful, wealthy, and "evil" forces are at work. Please note that I've been trying to some degree, so far, on this forum to give I.H. the benefit of the doubt. In the following highly speculative scenario — which could be totally off — I erase that benefit.
1 — The Rossi technology works as claimed and has been successfully replicated.
2 — When Andrea Rossi transferred the IP, he gave them ALL the information needed to produce working reactors of every kind. The low temperature units of every design and the high temperature units of every design.
3 — Industrial Heat successfully replicated the Rossi Effect repeatedly: inside their lab with Rossi present, at demonstrations to acquire investment, and in private locations that they disclosed to no one.
4 — In one of these private labs, they performed a long series of tests. The results were phenomenal. The bursts of excess heat were enormous and could last in self sustain mode for extended periods of time. However, they were also difficult to control precisely, which is a moot point; they had the money to hire engineers to design, build, and test a variety of control mechanisms.
5 — Darden showed these highly successful experiments to a wide array of individuals. Not only investors and stock holds in IH, but also government, military, and large corporate interests.
6 — More than one startled, alarmed prominent persons made statements such as…
a) "Tom, do you realize what you have here? This technology can never get out."
b) "We can't let Rossi introduce this to the market; this is the definition of a disruptive technology."
c) "If the truth of this technology gets out, my company will go under — all our investments in solar power will be worthless."
7 — Tom Darden and the "powers that be" came up with a plan. Continue working on the technology privately while publicly buying up all the LENR intellectual property they could find. Meanwhile, they would work to do three things: come up with a plan to introduce a very weak version of LENR (perhaps a modified version of Brillouin's technology) to be used sparingly to clean up the emissions from the dirtiest power plants, figure out a way to control the entire LENR field, and find a way to slow down or stop Rossi.
8 — The test of Rossi's 1MW plant was turning out to be a huge success. They decided that paying him wasn't an option — directly funding the proliferation of the E-Cat technology would make enemies of all their allies in the energy industry and upset other major "powers" that wouldn't want every nation in the world to have access to an unlimited source of dirt cheap energy. So they decided the best option would be to not pay and spend a couple million over a few years to fight Rossi in court. This would only cost a fraction of paying Rossi the 89 million while keeping everyone on the "inside" somewhat pacified. More importantly, it might buy them time to coordinate their CONTROLLED introduction of LENR to the world.
9 — The last thing they want to see now are multiple successful replications of the E-Cat technology by third parties. They hope that by mocking, attacking, and belittling Rossi in every way possible (personal visits by IH, emails, posts on blogs) they can at least dissuade individuals from focusing on the Rossi Effect and convince them to turn their attention to lesser LENR technologies — THAT THEY CONTROL.
10 — Their greatest fear is the E-Cat X Quark. If Rossi can scale up production to the billions of a product that can produce a very high thermal COP while producing some level of electricity directly, all current energy industries will start to shake and topple like a 9.0 Earthquake would shake New York City. All solar power companies, wind power companies, and even fossil fuel companies would be severely impacted. Many would flat out collapse.
Dr Andrea Rossi
A poll made yesterday confirms that people trust in you has increased after the complaint against IH, notwithstanding their massive attack against you made with powerful financial means.
How do you explain ?
Dear Andrea Rossi
Thank you for the model you gave us to understand how the Higgs field works: very nice.
Mr Rossi:
1- Did you request copies of all the energy and water bills paid by the customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat ?
2- are those bills coherent with the COP indicated in the Report ?
Just a curiosity, if you can answer.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
The Solar Impulse 2 plane and its two pilots are currently attempting to circumvent the globe by using only solar power to promote clean technologies.
Theoretically, if you remove the solar panels from the plane and retrofit it with several lightweight E-Cat QuarkX reactors to power its electric engines, you could easily demonstrate the tremendous capabilities of your E-Cat QuarkX to the world. With no solar panels on the plane, and with no heavy fuel or batteries stored onboard (with maybe the exception of a single emergency battery), no one could dispute that the E-Cat QuarkX was indeed providing the only power to the plane's electric engines.
If the LENR community were to get several sponsors to fund this demonstration (circumvent the world in record time), and if you would provide the necessary E-Cat QuarkXs, would you consider this a valid and dramatic way to show the E-Cat QuarkX to the rest of the world? I and your legions of fans want you win this battle against those that are trying to steal from you, and drag your good name through the mud. Let's shut up the skeptics with a dramatic demo that would leave no doubt that your E-Cat QuarkX will change the world!
Here's a link to the Solar Impulse website: http://www.solarimpulse.com/.
BTW, the Solar Impulse 2 effort is sponsored by Google, watchmaker Omega and robotics-focused ABB, among others.
With warm regards,
Is the geometry of the face centered cubic crystal (FCC) structure a necessary condition for LENR? I am intrigued by zirconium, but it has a hexagonal closest packing (HCP) structure. Does that or anything else negate zirconium as a catalyst?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The Opera ballet dancers are saying they do not need your technology because they have bought other much better technologies.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I tried to figure out how the Higgs boson works. A firend of mine told me you are able to make easier difficult concepts.
Can you make me able to figure out how the Higgs boson works?
Thank you
Dear Maurice,
It would be difficult for a single emission photon to be decreased by as much as would take the photon down to the KeV level by recoil effects. But if the process involved a cascading resonance process where there were multiple resonances, perhaps the accumulated recoil losses could take the initial photon down to this level, similar to the process found in fluorescence.
Energy level regards.
Dear Andrea,
Like many,many of your followers I know your technology works. My own thoughts are that IH are not stealing your technology but stopping you from bringing it into the world at this present time because one day it will have to be used. I do not know whether you can use it with a pending court case but if you can, maybe you should investigate the cement manufacturing industry, one of the oldest manufactured product in high demand but what it requires is lots of heat which contributes to most of its expense. If you could partner with people in the cement business or those who would like to get into the cement business I am sure your technology would propel you to be a world leader in both cement and LENR technology (not that you already not) and if you became a public company you would be inundated with prospective shareholders. I for one would be one. All the best Eric
Dear Andrea,
Here is another accusation from Mr. Weaver.
"Argon – how do you know so much about Rossi? Perhaps you should ask him about the flow meters that he replaced instead of the ones that IH spec'd and installed when the 1MW was built. That one is going to hurt when the truth comes out in court. The gig is up – the world is not going to wait for any more demos. The Lucy Peanuts football trick is played out."
Mr. Weaver alleges that you removed meters that IH had installed and replaced them with your own. This is the boldest accusation ever made so far by anyone from or in contact with I.H.
"Andrea Rossi is in a league of his own, beyond the rest of the LENR field, due to the triumph of the E-Cat technology. His recipe of carbonyl nickel, lithium aluminum hydride, and elemental lithium produces results far beyond the wildest dreams of other researchers. Everyone in the minor leagues should have realized this when, early on in this saga, Dr. Levi operated an E-Cat for EIGHTEEN HOURS primarily in self sustain mode. Repeatedly, he has conducted tests showing the massive excess heat his technology can produce. A one time assistant, who went by the handle Cures on the Cobraf forum, described in posts (some of which have been removed) countless early hot cats melting down. They would run away and reach temperatures that could melt ceramic. Hydrogen from a tank or from a chemical source — the massive excess heat was the same. He went so far as to report that the excess heat could be triggered by strait DC, pulsed DC, or AC input. Beyond Cures, we have third parties that have witnessed massive excess heat production. Some of these reports are still confidential, but others have been reported on. We also have replicators who have witnessed massive excess heat from the mixture of Ni and LiAlH4. Parkhomov achieved excess heat and at least one short period of self sustain, Songsheng achieved THREE HOURS of self sustaining excess heat at temperatures around 1300C in addition to other periods, N. Stepanov measured excess heat production by water flow calorimetry along with witnessing meltdowns, and there have been other replications as well.
The E-Cat technology doesn't just represent a hit that could get LENR onto first base, in the hopes of eventually scoring a run in the form of a commercial product. In fact, a GRAND SLAM HOME RUN doesn't do the E-Cat justice, metaphorically speaking. The "problem" some people refer to isn't the E-Cat technology itself or Rossi's less than mellow personality. Jealousy is at work. That's right, the sin of COVETOUSNESS.
Every LENR researcher wishes THEIR PRODUCT matched up or even came close to the performance of the E-Cat. So there is naturally a decent amount of resentment in the field against Rossi. After many years of work — although not with the same tireless work ethic of Rossi's — they have been able to, at best, generate very modest levels of COP at fairly low temperatures. Then all of a sudden there is a guy who shows off a string of reactor designs (for a while it seemed like there was a new demonstration every few weeks) with a LENR fuel capable of producing at least a KILOWATT PER GRAM at INFINITE COP (self sustain mode). Then a little while later, he ratchets up the temperature to levels which would allow easy-as-cake conversion to electricity using ordinary off the shelf steam turbines. The situation is like having a stranger move into your cul-de-sac, him having an estranged great aunt pass away leaving him an inheritance that pays off his house, and then win the jackpot lottery, all in the same month!
Even a regular church attending, Bible reading, soup kitchen volunteer that mows his elderly neighbors grass (for free) out of the goodness of his heart would feel at least a small pang of jealousy! Anyone would!
If LENR insiders are moving away from Rossi, the reason isn't because he is a scammer. The opposite is true. They would simply feel more comfortable without their super lucky neighbor hanging around. A mansion in Beverly Hills, a luxurious condo in Trump Tower, a luxurious mansion on a private island: he can live anywhere but the suburbs of LENR land!
Now let's get back to reality. The E-Cat works. Anyone who has followed this whole affair from the start MUST see that. And I am absolutely certain beyond any doubt that Thomas Darden of Cherokee is convinced the E-Cat works — including the one megawatt plant. Combining the huge amount of evidence for gigantic exothermic releases of energy with the setup of the 350 day test there is NO WAY a COP of 6 could be mistaken for a COP of 50. There were too many knowledgeable people there, too many sets of measurement equipment, and the test was too long for such a mistake to go unnoticed. In addition, the customer had THREE THINGS that would indicate if the plant was functioning at high COP: the WATER BILL, the ELECTRIC BILL, the QUANTITY OF PRODUCT MANUFACTURED. Each and every month if even ONE of these were significantly off it would have been an OBVIOUS SIGN something was wrong. If the water bill was LOW that would mean the plant wasn't producing the correct amount of steam and their production rate of nickel sponge would have dropped or halted. To be blunt, Johnson Matthey's engineers have the experience to know if a megawatt of steam — what was needed for the production at the plant — was being produced or not. If the electric bill was not dropping dramatically from before the plant was installed that would tell them that the COP was obviously low. From what we have been told by Mats Lewan, from one of his sources, the electric bill dropped dramatically! Also, if the plant wasn't producing the amount of heat required the manufacturing process would have slowed or stopped. And, of course, since the plant could only pull 300kW at maximum from the grid, if there was no significant excess heat produced, the plant could NOT HAVE PRODUCED THE NEEDED QUANTITY OF STEAM!
The 1MW plant worked and it worked wonderfully. For some reason we do not yet understand, Industrial Heat is denying this fact and trying to avoid paying Andrea Rossi. I really and sincerely hope the reason for their false assertions is that they just don't have the money. Being unable to pay due to not having the money in the bank wouldn't make up for what they've done. But at least it would be a less than totally nefarious answer to why they refused to pay and are being dishonest (trying to be diplomatic here because I don't like calling people liars) about the performance of the plant.
In a far worse scenario, Leonardo Corporation could be correct in their assertion: once Industrial Heat acquired Rossi's intellectual property they had no intention of paying him another red cent. Why could this be? I'll give a possibility that may or may not be correct, but it makes sense in my mind according to the knowledge I've accumulated by following this saga since the start.
Thomas Darden knows the E-Cat holds the potential to rapidly decimate all other sources of energy — including his precious renewable such as solar and wind. The E-Cat is simply an ideal technology that is far beyond what hot fusion scientists think may be possible in another thirty or forty years! Small, portable, energy dense, high temperature, clean, non-polluting, safe, and the closest thing to "free energy" mankind will ever figure out: the Energy Catalyzer holds too much disruptive potential. If accepted by the mainstream media and scientific community as real, the E-Cat wouldn't just "rock the boat" but could send every solar panel company, every wind energy company, and every conventional alternative energy company into BANKRUPTCY!
No government is going to give funding, grants, or tax breaks to solar, wind, tidal, or biofuel companies when the E-Cat exists.
No private institution is going to provide investment dollars or even loans to these companies.
No legislature, congress, or executive order from a sitting president will be able to save them.
I don't think Thomas Darden wants this to happen. And I think the same is true for the individuals that compose the circles of influence and power he communicates with. They want the status quo to be maintained and upheld. For this to happen, the hardest working, most intuitive, and luckiest man on the planet — Andrea Rossi — has to be stopped from commercializing his IMPOSSIBLE INVENTION, his PARADIGM SHATTERING MIRACLE, his SOLAR INDUSTRY STOCK CRASHER!
So they decide not to pay — possibly thinking they could re-negotiate with Rossi to drag things out for another extended period of time.
But Rossi has been back-stabbed, cheated, swindled, lied to, and attacked ruthlessly repeatedly in his life — yet he has survived to this day because he LEARNED from each of the encounters. As things were leading up to the completion of the test, he saw the writing on the wall, the signs that were obvious to see, and listened carefully to what was being said. He's a great observer, and he knew something wasn't right. Instead of begging and pleading to try and convince Industrial Heat his technology worked — when they already had the absolute proof — he came out swinging his white hot nickel plated, alpha particle emitting sword to defend himself.
The whole situation IS a headache for all of us. I agree with that. And the lawsuit has done damage to the LENR community. I agree with that as well. I'd even go so far that to outsiders or those individuals who have only casually kept up with this saga, the field looks like a "fusion" between an episode of MacGuyver and Breaking Bad. However, in this case, the damage to the image and reputation of the LENR field is not Rossi's fault. In my humble opinion, it lies squarely on Industrial Heat.
I'm not perfect. I could be wrong about several aspects of this analysis. My hope is that the issue is really *only* about Industrial Heat's lack of ability to round up the dough. But that just doesn't seem to make sense to me. What I know I'm not wrong about is the reality of the E-Cat. There is zero doubt whatsoever in my mind that it represents an energy breakthrough that rivals the warp cores and Mr. Fusion's of science fiction.
If anything, our community shouldn't distance ourselves from Rossi. Conversely, we need to push forward to perform additional replications of the E-Cat technology and support his efforts to commercialize the E-Cat Quark X. Whom I think, according to my understanding of the situation, that we should distance ourselves from is Industrial Heat."
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Any comments to the latest blog from Sifferkoll?
Dear Andrea,
See please
What you say here is Ok, however I have to confess that my story is too tragic
and I regret that I had to write it.
But, in a sense I had to do it.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the "reverse Mossbauer Effect": are you sure the recoil energy is enough to subtract energy from the gamma rays to the point to reduce them to 50-100 keVs ?
Thank you,
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Industrial Heat is slandering you beyond any possible imagination, but all they say is in evident contrast with the reality we can read in the facts. The more their puppets attack your character, the more we are convinced of the fact that they are not able to give to their investors a valid reason not to pay you and to lose your license.
There is only one explication for their behavior: they really have made disappear all the money the investors gave them and now they have not the money to pay you. This is the sole logic explication of what is going on.
The last attack made by NVHawk ( obviously a puppet of Tom Darden, probably the same that with an empty shell has has collected millions to be put in IH from investors) is that the flowmeter has been removed from the ERV and they could not have information of it; but you said repeatedly that all the instrumentation was property of the ERV and that the ERV has disassembled it at the end of the test to send it to the manufacturers to check the status of every instrument. This behavior of the ERV has been perfectly correct. Obviously, when he removed the instrumentation, included the flowmeter, all the guys of IH and Leonardo were around to control and take picture of everything, am I correct ?
Be careful , Andrea: that kind of people are ready to do anything to eliminate a person they have a debt of 89 millions with. Now they are saying slanders and lies…
Be careful.
Andy Stokes
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The new QuarkX is clerly something substantially different from what we know about the E-Cat described so far.
Please accept two questions:
1- do the electronics make the difference ?
2- do electronic or electric engineers of the team that worked with you during the 1 year test participate to this R&D ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In past you already had written in this blog that you were working to make a massive production factory. It was more than three years ago.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
J.O.N.P. has become the new "Comentarii de bello Gallico".
Have a good fight!
Dear Andrea:
Did the ERV make the certification of his instruments? Where is such instrumentation now?
Dear Mr Rossi
My thoughts are with you, you are on the right side of history
Dear Andrea,
Interesting news on Sifferkoll attack,!
Even better news your announcement of meeting in June!!!! Great!!!!
All the very best
Dear Dr Rossi:
It is confirmed: a puppet of Tom Darden (Weaver) has seriously hacked the blog of Sifferkoll because he was fighting to find the truth about IH stealing your IP.
Hello Dr Rossi,
in your answer to LL you made a statement about certification.
Speaking about that agreed upon certification process – is that process for the QuarkX itself as a machine, or is it related to industrial or domestic certification?
Thanks for clearing up any misunderstandings.
Best regards and all the best to you and your team,
Dear Andrea,
You wrote: "In June there will be an extremely important meeting with due persons with a closed doors official test."
1. Is this going to be an extended test over days?
2. Will it be in connection with a) product sales, or b) certification?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea
This is today's issue of my blog.
warmest regards,
Dear Andrea,
You answered to "LL" that in June you will have a closed doors official test. This sounds very good. My only advice is a trivial one: make sure that you have understood the testing protocol exactly in the same way as those who will be observing it. How to do it? By repeating to them in own words everything that they require you to do, and requiring them to do the same to those requirements that you have.
As an example, just very recently I was part of an episode (unrelated to LENR, of course) where one person had misread one sentence in a slightly sloppily written official document. As a result, 100 emails were exchanged between five people, until it was realised that all was just much ado about nothing. (No problem since this is government: we are even supposed to be inefficient:-)
Cross-checking regards, /pekka
>The sun is rising
and the day will be beautiful!
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
About the theory you are developing: how do you explain the fact that no gamma rays with high energy are emitted fron the E-Cats ?
Dear Andrea,
I think I'm aware of a few of the "snakes" to whom you are referring.
In reality, most of them have very little to no concern WHATSOEVER about radiation being emitted outside of the reactor. The fundamental root of their antagonistic and obsessively mean spirited behavior is simple: they're jealous.
No one has been able to develop an LENR technology that comes remotely close to the E-Cat.
– No one has achieved the power output per gram of fuel. Parkhomov, who replicated the Rossi Effect, was able to achieve about a kilowatt per gram of fuel. This is completely unoptimized and without the know how you possess that obviously boosts this figure higher. Conversely, you're competitors sometimes brag about a few watts per KILOGRAM of their version of a "charge."
– No one has achieved stable output at the ultra high temperatures the E-Cat can reach. If the E-Cat X operates at 1480C, as you have stated, you're literally miles beyond them.
– Although no one has achieved the massive power output you have per gram of fuel, the E-Cat is also capable of doing this in a SELF SUSTAINING MANNER for periods of many hours. And this is not a new development: the 18 hour test Dr. Levi performed many years ago with a much more early version of the E-Cat was mostly in SSM!
– When all of this is brought up, you're detractors then struggle to look for negatives about your technology. They usually resort to off the wall and false accusations like: he must produce neutrons at such high temperatures, he must "seed" his fuel with radioactive isotopes, or he is risking human safety by operating in self sustain mode.
As I said before, the root of all this hostility is JEALOUSY. They are breaking one of the Ten Commandments by COVETING your technology. Then, furthermore, they are giving FALSE WITNESS against you.
They know as well as both of us that the technology is safe. If it were not safe, you'd be in the grave by now. For goodness sakes, you've witnessed so many meltdowns during intentional torture tests that if the technology emitted radiation you wouldn't be with us today!
Sadly, in addition to their jealous rage that they were not the first to develop a practical high powered LENR technolgoy like the E-Cat, some of them have developed a personal vendetta against you. They have issues with you as a human being. I know this for a fact: one "snake" told me that if the E-Cat turned out to be real the fact *you* had developed it would basically shatter his reality (paraphrasing here and not giving an exact quote).
I just wanted to set the record straight for readers. The snakes out there aren't concerned about radiation being emitted: they're simply acting like a snot nosed brat in elementary school who is pitching a tantrum because his entry into the science fair didn't win a medal. He then goes up to the display table of the star pupil who took FIRST PLACE and tries to knock it over. The good news is that in the end, the principal of the school catches him in time, puts a dunce cap on his head, and makes him stand in the corner: where he needs to stay.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you give an update about the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi
What do you think of the Paris world conference concerning the global warming?
Dear Andrea,
Your kind answers and some LENR Info is here:
best wishes,
Dear Michelangelo Gucci,
Please contact us by email firstname.lastname@example.com
Best Regards,
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Dear Dr Rossi
Why is it Good to NOT Release the COP~50 ERV #LENR Report?
Mr. Rossi,
I've to honestly confess you -as a foreword- that I'm on the skeptical side of the road, wrt E-Cat story.
This said, I'm rather surprised when I read that, according to your words:
1- the robotized line to produce the E-Cats is already in production
2- the programs of the robots will be adjusted as soon as we will have the requirements from the certificators
3- we already got the green light from all the competent Authorities, so far the certifications are done
Are you saying you've setup a production factory, able to manufacture MILLIONS of devices per year, without any information spillage?
Have you excavated a deep bunker under a high mountain, and hidden your factory there, or drilled the Moon, or what?
It seems really difficult to me to cover such a -probably- huge and complex factory and keep confidential the whole process. Really unbeleivable, if I have to be honest.
So, may I kindly ask you at least where (meaning: in which Country) the factory is located? If not the Country, may I at least know the continent?
Thanks in advance,
seen on ECW:
I can See that Mr Rossi has not finished his Marathon run yet.
Being the tenacious man that he undoubtedly is he will go till the finish.
The hills and dales that have and still confront him leave the man undaunted.
He runs on still controlling his pace and breathing.
We will applauded when he crosses the line.
Mats Lewan Calls for "Group Effort" to Get to the Truth on Rossi/IH Affair.
Dear Andrea,
In my opinion, Intel would be a better model for you than Microsoft. Intel's product is physical and their market has competition (AMD) which they win by large production volume and by making good products.
A Microsoft-type monopoly is only possible in a market where the interface is (or can be made) too complicated for competitors to follow. In energy production the interface is very simple because it is just energy, a physical quantity. It's even simpler than in Intel's case, where the interface is the instruction set (AMD competes with Intel by using the same instruction set). The simpler the interface, the easier it is to compete.
regards, /pekka
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Will the E-Cat be distributed also in Italy, if you will reach a massive production?
Dear Andrea,
Did you ever think to sell energy instead of devices? If you start selling cheaper energy, you should have the discussions moved away from the technology you are using to produce it.
Dear Andrea,
It is with dismay I see that your blog is no longer about invention and progress, but about legal battles. Morally I am on your side, whatever that is worth. I hope you manage to turn this around. You deserve it. The life as an inventor is a tough life. Thieves are around every corner. It is tough to invent, but it is easy to steal.
Best Regards
Dr Rossi,
Do you use titanium in the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi
Did I understand well that you now aim at making a small module to pile up more modules and reach any power limit ?
Do you know a Mr John Dewey Weaver, CEO of the venture capital group "Deep River Venture", in Raleigh, North Carolina, a good friend of Tom Darden, has played a role in collecting money from investors to put it in IH Holdings International Ltd, where Woodford and Tom Darden have put all the money of the investors saying it was to buy your IP
Are you aware of this company "Deep River Venture" and John Dewey Weaver ??
Torkel Nyberg ('Sifferkoll') and Mats Lewan are
doing a pretty good job of trying to untangle the mess:
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Please, stop talking of this damn litigation, let's return to talk of science, technology and our beloved E-Cat !!!
if you can answer, according to your (past) agreement, does IH have rights for all versions of e-cat or is limited somehow?
Thanks, Gherardo
Dr Rossi,
Please share this interesting link – Wow! $100 Million Contract Signed For LENR
"Believe me, nobody in their right mind would pay $16m for a technology that doesn't work. We're living in interesting times, people. I hope you have positioned yourself to profit from the coming Energy Revolution."
Dear Andrea,
During the 1-year E-Cat plant test, during the time the plant was operating (excluding down times), what was the average power output (thermal)?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr. Rossi, you have been vigilant and valiant trying to keep your IP from what I call Crony Capitalists (Wikipedia definition). IH and Darden have hired the brightest and the best propagandists and legal minds in the world to bend public opinion and our laws to take control of LENR. I realize I do not have as many of the facts as you do, but from my perspective there are three things you can do to counter the propaganda and legal landslide that is about to hit you: 1) Release the report on the yearlong test 2) Get a reliable customer to come forward and vouch for economic value of your E-Cat 3) Sell as many of your E-Cats to customers as fast as possible. Respectfully, what do you say to these three suggestions?
Dear Andrea,
Just published daily info:
Please do not take the DAILY NOTES as serious, it is simply amazing what nightmarish low IQ attacks can take place.
Caro Dott Rossi,
solidale,come sempre.
Cari saluti Giovanni Guerrini
Dear Andreas Rossi,
Please understand that Tom Darden and Industrial Heat want what you
have and they will stop at nothing to get it.
Tom Darden sold your dream to his investors and they listened
and invested in the ecat – YOUR ECAT – and now you have
suffered irreparable damage short of a settlement equal to the crime.
This will take many years to crawl through the courts and that is
exactly what they want to string you out with extended court dates
and appeals year after year.
All we can hope is that you follow up with your own production
and eventually the home units.
Dear Andrea,
Can you answer the following questions:
1. What was the maximum electricity input available to the 1MW E-Cat plant during the year long test?
2. Have the electricity bills from the power company supplying power to the plant for the duration of the test been retained by the customer?
3. If so, are these bills available to Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat?
4. Are these bills included in the ERV report?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If you do not already know, I would like to lead your attention to Mats Lewan's initiative "join force to bring out the truth on Rossi-IH affair".
There Mats Lewan and some other commentators try to clean up the mess, to loosen knots and I have learned many new things and got a better understanding of some relationships and last but not least it is exciting to read.
Best regards
Felix Rends
German Moderator http://www.lenr-forum.com
Dear Mr. Rossi
No, I did not speak of bombs and rabbits. My original post:
Dear Mr. Rossi
You wrote:
"I am confused: IH says my plant is worth nothing…but: to fight against something that is worth nothing, do you need the most powerful Law Firm of the world ?…"
Please be aware of the 87,000,000 reasons IH has to do it.
Andrea I'm just finishing Jane Mayer's new book, "Dark Money"; with all the troubles IH is presenting now I wonder if the Oil Oligarcy is cleverly funding them? Please have your legal staff review her book if you also have no time. Charles Koch the right wing billionaire is also Chemical engineer; funds many things demise that he does not control or own! Please be careful our legal system can be a problem with the Dark Money people conniving without our knowledge! Their economic resources are beyond belief; their action loaded with greed!
You friend and ally Jim
Mr Rossi:
The reason why IH is shooting an atomic bomb is that 89,000,000 $ are not a rabbit.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I want to clarify my previous post.
When David beat Goliath, he realized that the fight was not fair. So, he cheated and used a rock and a sling. That is how he managed to slay Goliath.
If you think that the fight is fair, I am afraid you might lose.
Faithfully yours
Rip Van Winkle
E' un momento difficile.
Certo, esistono le sentenze per difendere la propria buonafede ma forse, adesso, dovrebbe anche cercare l'appoggio della gente comune che non aspetta le sentenze ma si "accontenta" di cio' che i media/internet gli servono, purtroppo non si vince solo nei tribunali. Perché non organizzare, magari presso una università, una dimostrazione dell'Ecatx? So che é contrario, ma adesso forse é il momento giusto.
It 'a difficult moment.
Sure, there are judgments to defend their good faith but maybe, now, should also seek the support of ordinary people who do not expect the sentences but are "satisfied" of what 'the media / internet serve him, unfortunately do not win only in the courts. Why not organize, maybe it took a university, a Ecatx demonstration? I know it is not, but perhaps now is the right time
(ps: se la traduzione é errata (Google) é autorizzata a corregere gli strafalcioni)
Pietro F.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You have already been framed by the maffia once. Do you realize that you are up against a global much more powerful maffia this time?
Faithfully yours
Rip Van Winkle
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I hope your E-Cats will arrive also in Russia.
Dear Dr Irina Uzikova and Dr Vitaly Uzikov:
Can you send an offer for the supply of one plant able to treat 100 kg/h of low level radioactive wastes ?
We can be interested to buy a plant to be installed in Europe.
Please let us know:
1- the address to send our request to
2- if you prefer to sell the know how or the plant
DR Rossi Sir,
It appears that Industrial heat after reading the link below has hired a
massive law firm to silence the E-CAT, Jones Day has 2,500 attorneys and
this is unprecedented.
There are at least 5 people presently that I am personally aware of collecting
data and writing books on this saga.
expect the movie to be as interesting.
Dr Rossi,
By Law ** Industrial Heat must have communicated their problems to investors.
"The standard of an established firm (IH) that knows or suspects a problem —
e.g., the prospects for the product or the company are at risk in any
way greater than disclosed in the prospectus — it has to tell potential investors."
Woodward Fund was advised that their 50 million was at risk with the ecat generator
that did not work and Woodward did not disclose this to its investors ?
it would appear that Industrial Heat has promoted gross misrepresentations if your
ecat does not work, but, on the contrary, Tom Darden said publicly that the test was going well and he collected 50 millions during the test from Woodford.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you give us a resume of the reasons why Leonardo Corporation and IH have chosen the ERV that directed the one year test ?
Thank you,
seen on ECW:
This has all the hallmarks of a genuine fight. I think IH has been extremely inconsistent in the positions that they have taken. They have a lot of explaining to do in my book. As others have pointed out, there might be larger interests at stake, which might be distorting this whole affair.
Dr Rossi,
I seen this very interesting description of what is happening with you and Industrial Heat.
Dear Andrea,
I know you may not be explicit, for obvious reasons, but I would like your own assessment in points of my analysis:
By using the "Occam's razor" (If factors being equal the simplest explanation is to be preferred)
1) if IH so sure to be in the right, then it is foolish one big law firm (which will cost many thousands of $)
2) if e-cat is "false", then IH has had years to know (and to make everybody known)
3) if the Penon report is "false", then IH was holding everything to try it in a short time. Without lawyers.
4) If Rossi is right, then he's got a head-start and IH wants to eliminate it (discrediting Rossi for the time sufficient to act alone)
In general for LENR, for Rossi, for all those who work for a new energy to the world, two questions:
5) A new form of energy, clean and cheap, necessarily represents a huge breakthrough in the political, economic, environmental, historical, mental, psychological. It creates terror among those who want to direct everything. Although it is absolutely necessary, as not to expect problems?
6) Can "the common man" (not tied to regimes or interests) win?
This is a great test for democracy and for freedom
thx in advance
Dear Dr Rossi,
This will go down as one of the largest Corporate scandals in history where
Industrial Heat set up elaborate systems to lie and get around your patents
in order to trick you in to believing you were a real partner to acquire your
intellectual property
Then after raising millions in funds from multiple sophisticated investors including
Woodward Fund demonstrating your ECat now Tom Darden and Industrial Heat say it does
the ECAT does not work.
Really Darden's behavior as similar to a ponzi scheme, collect the money then come
out with a new product.
Dr Rossi You will prevail in court and Industrial Heat and partners will go live in shame
and disgrace.
Dear Andrea,
A short look today to the rather troubled world of LENR:
Best regards,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the comment of H: the truth is emerging, IH is just trying not to pay you after stealing your technology. They are running all around the world to slander you because they have not real evidence against you, otherwise they'd save money and just wait the hearings in front of the Court. They act like door to door pottery sellers,
with or without their powerful puppets.
You will win, because you are a true worker, they are..I stil did not understand what they are.
The important for us is that you work in peace, as you said.
Dear Dr Rossi:
This is big.
Read carefully, because gives evidence of the fraud made by IH.
Mr John Dewey Weaver, CEO of the venture capital group " Deep River Venture", in Raleigh, North Carolina, is going around the world to inform everybody that the test on the 1 MW plant has been not valid and that your process does not work, and is making this with gusto. But I know him, and I want you to know this: Deep River Venture" has been an empty shell from July 7 2012 to May 6 2015. In this year Mr John D. Weaver, old friend of Tom Darden, has collected money from investors to put it in IH Holdings International Ltd, wherein also Woodford has put 50 millions. All this money had to be collected to buy your IP, that was very hot, with the test on course of the 1 MW Plant, that Tom Darden promoted everywhere as a fantastic test, in conferences he made in US, in China. But that money has taken other directions; in fact, IH International Holdings Limited from the beginning knew that they were not going to pay you, even if, to convince their investors to give them the money, they were saying that the test on the 1 MW plant was stellar ( see the report of the conferences and interviews made in the USA,China, Italy by Darden ). For this reason, they started to buy patents and IP around the world, paying them few hundred thousands of dollars, plus MILLIONS in shares that are worth nothing, because all that IP they bought around the world is made by things that never worked: revoked or rejected patents or patents on things of small value, among which a printer; I should be very curious to know how the "fair value" of such shares has been certified…
It is clear that guys like John D. Weaver are just puppets of Darden, used to collect money: the "Deep River Venture" of Raleigh, NC, is a company that has a turn over of 88 000 $: which weight can it have in a concern that Woodford structured with 50 million $ ??? So, why he is spending so much time to travel around all the world to slander you ?
We are sending you evidence of what I wrote here.
The next gift will be the presentation of the real nature of the "PhD" : I tell you: it will be fun!
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain us or anticipate what will happen during the hearings in Court ?
Dear Dr Rossi
Kindly note this article posted on the MIT Technology Review website which discusses recent work in the area of 3D printing of Ceramic materials which may (or may not) have relevance for novel E-Cat reactor designs. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601245/new-3-d-printing-technique-makes-ceramic-parts/
Dear Andrea,
can you at least tell us how the report is structured, how many pages it is?
Thanks in advance
Stefania Conti
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Have you submitted the spent fuel contents for isotopic examination?
If an isotope examination was attempted, will it include the measurement the relative isotope ratios for hydrogen and helium?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
What do you consider an adequate eCat R&D test period:
1. What number of experiments?
2. What duration (i.e., number of days)?
3. Until no more anomalies have been observed and engineering changes are no longer required?
4. Until a long-duration experiment yields certain COP objectives?
Dear Mr. Rossi,
IH have been very, very active in Washington demonstrating LENR for lawmakers. They have hired "APCO Worldwide" (lobbyists) to inform member of the Congress and Senate of IH:s version of the LENR story.
You have expressed confidence in the American system but to get it to work you needs to fully participate (not only lawsuits).
Have you any plans to make demonstrations for lawmakers or any other Government agency to balance IH actions??
If you don't.. the lawmakers will make regulations based on information passed by "APCO Worldwide".
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Are you continuing to work on the E-Cat even in the middle of this mess with your enemies ?
Dear Dr Rossi,
Again Davide against Golia …
We know that the ECat can put in danger all the power structures that are deeply connected with the centralized production of energy, and I suspect that the world is much more controlled at a higher level than we are used to think…
Do not know if it can be of help, but when Edward Snowden did what he did, and he changed the world much less than the ecat can do, he went to China and Russia …. May this powers be of help also for you?… Just a possibility…
Davide won Golia…
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
Alessandro – ecatnews.it
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How has the work of Dr. Norman D. Cook been progressing on developing the theorems and scientific principles that are the foundations of the "Rossi Effect"?
Does Patent Law, or do restrictions imposed by the litigation now underway in Florida Federal Court, impact on what Prof. Cook can say or publish about this effect? That is, he may say that it depends on known Physics principles A & B, and Theorems C & D, but you need the rest of the alphabet – and several other alphabets – for the details.
Alphabetagamma regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
First I wish you all the strength and succes with the lawsuit with IH!
Some questions, if I may:
1. Do you need to offer a lot of your time to the lawsuit with IH, or can you nearly undisturbed work on you R&D?
2. Do you progress on building factories for the production of E-cat's (and/or QuarkX's)?
3. Are you happy with your progress on the QuarkX/turbine combination?
4a. When will you deliver your first commercial E-cat?
4b. What type will it be?
4c. What power level will it have?
4d. Would you be able to inform us about its performance/customer satisfaction once and a while?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Have just published the interview notes and info:
Very interesting Bazhutov's Russian E-Cat demo.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I understand that to invest in your technology is a great risk, but I like the risk. How can I invest in your E-Cat ?
I can sign a disclaimer accepting any risk.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Who is H ?
I am very intrigued about what he said.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
How is going today your R&D with the QuarkX?
Thank you for your great work,
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I appreciated the fresh air from Francesco Celani. About fresh air: we, your followers, are preparing a nice surprise for the "pure scientists" that are attacking you and that tried to stop your work the dirt way, in close contact with the snakes.
You do not know us, but we are strongly taking your back against this dark work. You will get fun, stay tuned, because we discovered very well who they are, how they make money, why they want your death.
You are working hard for all of us, and at the same time you are making a duel, David against Goliath; Goliath has put hidden men to shoot at your back during the duel, but there we are too, and we discovered anything of them. Next week there will be fun in the blogosphere.
You think how to work for us, we think how to defend you.
Godspeed, Andrea! Never give up !
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I wish more scientists would welcome your great progress instead of spreading false information and perform obvious acts of jealousy.
"If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!"
With all these gossip mongers and small minded people around, it was a breath of fresh air to read Prof. Celani's appreciated words about your achievement.
"Dear Andrea Rossi and Colleagues,
I am really happy about the positive results of such, extremely long, test.
My CONGRATULATIONS to Andrea: he was the real winner of 27 years long battle.
My opinion is that, if all will go "well", our world will change quite quickly.
The direction of changing will depend on the "managing", in the very near future, such REVOLUTIONARY invention."
To your success!
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you have a licenced distributor/reseller for Leonardo Corporation's E-Cat products in Malta (Europe)? Do I contact the reseller or do I contact Leonardo Corporation directly for a 1 MW unit inquiry?
Many thanks,
Dear Andrea,
This Sunday isssue of my Blog:
is, unfortunately, missing the very spirit of Sunday.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
1- When the E.Cat QuarkX will go in commerce ?
2- When will it be possible for the public to invest in your activity ?
Dear Andrea,
I think that IH has invested into the Brillouin corp because of persuasions by Godes and McKubre of their work in LENR devices. Brillouin has a working agreement with a Chinese firm which may be connected to IH since they were promoting a cooperative effort last year. If IH has decided to go in the direction of Brillouin, they would do anything to slow down your entry into the market place.
Suspicious regards
Would it be possible for you to make & sell DIY demonstration "pellets" that would contain sealed powder (with heat sink?) that generates excess heat when heated? Something like 100W might be good for demo, and maybe more for DIY heating system.
Dear Dr Rossi:
One of your work's achievements, maybe not much appreciated by you, but recognized by all the main players in the field of LENR, is that thanks to your work LENR have raised the attention of economic giants like Bill Gates, Boeing, Airbus, etc etc, with a falldown of financing that has resuscitated a world of zombies ( as you defined it ) as the LENR world before your publications.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
There is around a rumor that during the test of the 1 MW E-Cat there was another ERV besides the official one: is that true ?
Dear Andrea,
Will the QuarkX go through a series of public tests as the E-Cat did, after the R&D on course will have been completed ?
Andrea Rossi,
Can you comment about the progress of the work by Dr. Norman D. Cook on the scientific/theoretical basis/(bases) of the Rossi Effect?
Extended regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Andrea Rossi:
What do you think of the replication on course of the so called "Rossi Effect" ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Somebody puts in discussion that you have 200 patents in preparation or pending.
Dear Andrea.
I recommend You to explore the possibilities to cooperate with the companies Alevo and Ormat. The three of You may be a perfect technologically match.
Best regards: Svein Henrik.
Dear Andrea Rossi
I thought you and those who follow your work might find this work on the new field of Teslaphoresis interesting and informative:
Kind Regards Ian Walker
Dr Rossi
How is going today your R&D work with the QuarkX ?
Dear Andrea,
Just a bit of LENR info for today:
An Prize is given you from Australia
by Doug Marker.
Really best wishes,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I as Chairman of Organizing Committee of the Conference is pleased to invite you to attend the Conference (RCCNT&BL-23).
The 23d Russian Conference on Cold Nuclear Transmutation and Ball-Lightning (RCCNT&BL-23) is to be held during June 19–25, 2016. The place of the Conference is Olympic (Dagomys) Hotel in the city of Sochi that is the best recreation and holiday place on the Black See shore of Russia.
The program of the Conference includes the following subjects:
• Experimental research in Cold Nuclear Transmutation and Ball-Lightning;
• Theoretical models with respect to Cold Nuclear Transmutation and
Ball-Lightning effects;
• Applied to these problems technologies and devices.
Best regards. See you in Sochi. (email@example.com)
Yury Bazhutov.
Dr Rossi, I am interested in reading what Woodford Fund told their investors about the 50+ millions they invested with Industrial Heat – Fund Managers must keep investors informed – it's the law and let's hear where Woodford stands on the original investment OR is it something else now, sounds like the Woodford board wants to make highly speculative investments on the back of their investors, after all Industrial Heat says the ecat does not work.
Where is Woodfords Response to this?
Why the delay in responding to investors?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Woodford in February 2015 has spent 50 milions of their investors to buy shares of IH, based on the fact that at that time IH was the US licensee of Leonardo Corporation, which means the E-Cat. Now it turns out that that money has not been spent to buy the license of Leonardo and you filed a suit for fraud against IH, Cherokee et al. asking the fevoke of the license because they did not pay you. In change, the Woodford investors can get solace from the fact that IH has bought other patents from your competitors, but all the new IP of IH is made of revoked patents ( e.g. Piantelli) or patents related to electrolysis, obsolete control systems, copy machines and other stuff of this kind, practically useful for nothing. Curious to note that most of this "IP" has been paid in shares, which leaves open a question: who calculated a so friendly "fair value" and where is finished the real money paid by the investors? We are talking of 50 million dollars, paid from Woodford to IH after the visit of their men in your 1 MW E-Cat plant in operation in the factory of the customer.
What do you think?
Andrea Rossi:
I have a hard time believing that after all this time that what you are claiming is not real. How long did it take the world to finally admit that Pons and Fleismen actually new what they were doing and spoke the truth.
The world is so much in need of such a clean/cheap source of energy. It will make the greening of the deserts possible and clean water available to those who have none. And this is just the beginning of the possibilities. Energy will no longer be the limiting factor to all that we do. Transportation, space travel, you name it and it all changes for the better. It's time for us to retire the horse and buggy!
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Someone made a list of all your comments about the automated production line, staring from this one in 2012
Can you recap the history of this "promised land" and the reasons why are we still waiting for it?
Automated Regards
Dr Andrea Rossi:
What is your opinion about supersymmetry ?
Mr Andrea Rossi:
Are you worried of the reverse engineering that will be made on your E-Cat after the diffusion of this device ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going on your R&D with the QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In your Team now is there any person that had worked with IH during the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat ?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
There are rumors that Leonardo Corp bought back most of the licences that had been sold in past. I spoke with a former licensee of Leonardo who told me that you bought back almost all the licences previously sold at the same price the licensees had paid to Leonardo, plus the 10% as a premium.
I have two questions, if you can answer, as the CEO of Leonardo Corp:
1- why the licences have been bought back ?
2- are those licences for sale to other licencees ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
Now being aware that Mats Lewan has canceled the Symposium, do you still intend to have a public meeting and reveal or demonstrate something as you previously intended to?
If so, is a date or month and place planned for this?
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I am a high school student and also a follower of your work. My prof of Physics wants not to talk of LENR. What do you suggest me to do ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Dear Andrea,
You have said that you have many back orders of industrial plants, but how many companies/organizations are you actively working with to build and deliver plants for?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
I have published this
Now I see it was too optimistic and nice
the situation is more messy.
Dear Dr Rossi:
I agree with all that Jack said.
Dear Andrea,
Perhaps this has already been called to your attention.
Monday 4-11-16 on LENR-FORUM a member, me356, posted a link to a short video (page 38 of me356: Reactor Parameters thread) showing apparent excess heat being triggered. It appears to be a very good replication of the Lugano Hot Cat. On 4-12-16 (Page 42 of that thread) another member, BEC (Brillouin Energy), is trying to pump more info from me356 as to the trigger method. This seems to agree with your statement of IH giving away your IP but it seems that their "experts in the art" are having difficulty in obtaining desirable results.
Here is a paintbrush, here is some paint, here is a pallet to mix them like so and you get these colors. Stroke the brush to the canvas like so to get this line. Modulate the brush to get the appearance of curly hair. But still their picture does not resemble a Rembrandt. Keep your cards close to your chest Andrea! No comment necessary. There are a lot of eyes watching your back my friend.
Dear Andrea:
Jack is right, from the first to the last word.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
At the beginning I was convinced you were wrong and IH was right, but after reading all the rants of Jed Rothwell and the other hatchet men of IH and looked through the papers that have been published in the internet, I changed idea. You are right in the dispute against IH.
What convinced me is a foundamental thing. While IH was raising 50 millions from Woodford ( whose role has to be analyzed carefully ) JT Vaughn, in the same very days was writing to the authorities that your plant was not working and used a physicist connected with your competitors to induce the healthcare dept. of Florida to close your plant and interrupt the test. This fact, easy to understand reading carefully all the papers in the internet, clearly discloses the strategy of IH: use you to collect millions from investors, but, at the same time, stop you to forbid you to complete the test, so that they can avoid to pay you. Their strategy was, and is, to justify with their investors saying they are collecting money for an R&D that will never end…and block any factual development of your E-Cat, at the same time buying toilet papers to show to the investors ( and the auditors of Woodford and company ) that they have a lot of IP at the stake and that you are only one piece of the mosaic; this way they justify with the investors that they got 50 millions and eventually lost your license , which initialy was the pillar of their value.
From one side we have a man that has worked 16-18 hours per day, risking his health while making the Guinea pig, putting all his life in this risky endevour, on the other side we have financial smartasses that without working got 50 millions, or more, from Woodford, started a 200 milions concern in China, and at the same time tried to "kill" you: look at what JT Vaughn said to the North Carilina healthcare authority exactly while he was colecting 50 millions from Woodford. Why ? Because they never wanted a real work done, they always wanted only sell toilet paper to make easy money.
I was an enemy of you, Dr Rossi, but Rothwell and his paid armada of hatchets has convinced me that you are fighting against sharks to defend a work you have dedicated your life to. This having been said, now do not lose time in chatters with these assholes, continue to focus on your work and put the E-Cat on the market. This is the sole way you have to sweep away this trash.
An admirer of your efforts,
May God help you
Dr Rossi:
Do you think at this point the public could invest in your enterprise ?
Dear Mr. Rossi,
At the start of your polemic court proceedings with IH I proffered my absolute backing for your cause as I was convinced of not only your honesty, but hard work and integrity as it seemed to me by all your opinions and actions during the past few years that I have been following you. Since then I have been quietly reading the arguments for and against you from different blogs and articles and I have come to the conclusion that I was 100% correct in my assessment of you as a person, businessman and inventor, your extraordinary character and willpower under the tremendous pressure is admirable!
I won't ask you to keep up the battle, as I know you will, until the end.
With my best wishes
Luis Navarro
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I would like to have signed from you by copy of Mats Lewan's book "An inpossible invention".
Is it possible?
Dr. Rossi: You know better than I do, because of our past discussions on the subject, that thousands of lives are at stake for every month your E-Cat is held from the market place. I also am convinced you are a sincere humanitarian, so, for you to say "let in peace our pioneer-Customer(s)", when words from these customers can end the debate about the reality of LENR and your E-cat; respectfully, to me does not make sense. You have many orders for your E-cats, isn't it possible for you to find a customer who is willing and able to verify publicly the economic value of your E-Cats? Thanks for listening.
Dear Andrea,
I think at some point your technology will get the interest of government inspectors, with or without the encouragement of your opponents. Don't you think it would be good to establish the safety of the E-Cat for the governments and people of the world? I thinkt this would help quiet any fears about technology and help with worldwide acceptance.
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
a small contribution to the developing LENR Geography and exploration:
Dear Andrea,
Are you in the process of constructing devices for any other customers? I think you stated in the past that you have billions of dollars of pre-orders that are awaiting an offer.
Preordered regards.
Dear dr. Rossi,
As I was very busy, I didn't follow the JNP for a while, but today I've read Mats Lewan post, and I tend to believe that you're right. The fact that IH also tried to work with your competitors, spending money on them (instead of paying you for your hard work), makes me believe that they wanted to take over your IP and your business, and I wish you success in fighting against this.
Kind Regards,
Daniel De Caluwé
Dear Andrea Rossi
Like many I am saddened that the matters with IH have to be resolved in court.
I commend your fortitude and determination. As you have said, the enterprise is at this stage of development a warship not a cruise ship.
That description is meaningful.
I have one question about the Leonardo Corp. offering to supply heat under contract. If you have this information, can you publish a figure (or figures)for how many lineal feet of two lane roadway, the the 10 MW heat plant can keep clear of ice and snow in the U.S.during a winter?
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
you wrote:
" Andrea Rossi
April 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM
No: the e.p. they are looking for, and the effects they are looking for demand energies so high that I think no practical use of them will ever be made. "
I think there is a lot of stockpiled radioactive waste to be neutralized. R&D should go on. For all next generations.
Unless you mean by this answer that you have found a way to use the E-Cat technology to modify radioactive products.
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
1) You don't need to feel obligated to provide precise characteristics of the E-Cat X (or Quark). A rough preliminary summary, subject to change, would be extremely welcome! Would you be willing to give out a description that doesn't include performance metrics?
2) You have several other patents pending in addition to the granted patent, "Fluid Heater." Have you been given any indication by your patent attorney or the patent office how soon these patents may be granted?
3) I've been doing additional reading on hydrogen loading in the past week and have a ton of concepts bouncing around in my head: Van der Waals forces at the surface, interstitial sites between atoms in the nickel lattice, a-phase & b-phase loading, the creation of elastic tension by hydrogen atoms in the lattice, micro-void formation where re-formation of atomic hydrogen to molecular hydrogen can occur, extensive surface modification resulting in cracks and micro-cavities, and how pressure and temperature play a part in all of this. You were very correct that there was not one exhaustive text on the loading of hydrogen into nickel powder. But there is a good bit of information out there scattered about in various papers. Do you have any thoughts in general about this topic you can share?
4) Since you cannot provide the ERV report at this time, is there anyway you could publish your own data that was collected and the figures you derived?
5) Have you ever mechanically created a hole, pore, or cavity on a sample of nickel and then successfully induced a nuclear reaction at the location?
6) Has Industrial Heat observed self-sustaining behavior from the E-Cat replications they built themselves?
7) Have you directly measured an alpha particle flux with a charged particle detector from an E-Cat in operation? If so, can you describe what you detected? Second only to self sustained heat production, I think this would be absolute, beyond refutable evidence that could be used in court. Of course if the alphas are thermalized mostly in the micro-cavities, they might not escape to then penetrate through a small aperture in the reactor.
8) A long time ago you mentioned that you might in the future release images/video of the massive melt down of a reactor that produced a megawatt of power for ten seconds which melted ceramic. The video could be a morale booster from some of your supporters whom are having brain splitting headaches right now. Would you consider releasing it?
Thank you for your time and continued willingness to move forward to commercialize this technology.
Dr. Rossi: In response to my question about the customer of year long test, you said, "a company cannot be happy of all the blogosphere hurricane around this issue." This customer could be so important to the future of LENR because of the attention drawn to the yearlong test, there must be some incentive you or we could give him to come forward and talk about the economic value, cost savings, of your E-Cats. I think you underestimate your power of persuasion, and maybe the importance of this issue. I know you are busy, but please re-think above. Thanks for answering our questions.
Dear Dr Rossi:
There are so many people following your story, cheering for you, supporting you, praing for you, and yet the only thing you have given back in these last years are some 'Rossi says' that most of the time are followed by 'someone says not ' . And I mean.. you don't owe them anyhing, you are not supposed to satisfy the general public curiosity just in exchange of some sort of cybernetic support. But seriously, we are not talking about telenovelas curiosity, we are talking about people worried about the future of energy, the future of this planet, the future of their children, because hey, don't try to give me the 'all energy sources will be integrated' joke, your tech. is kind of last hope.
And I understand your worries about the competition, I understand the very long time needed to a such unconventional tech to be developed properly.
But there are soooo many ways you could put an end to the skeptics chatters, that you could prove without any doubt that your tech does what 'Rossi says' . And yet you don't do it.
Once again it's just Secret customers secret deals, secret results of reports..
You are a good man I'm sure of that. Just think that it would cost you nothing to give something back to those that have been defending your name for this long time
Hello Mr Rossi,
regarding the eCat delivery of heat: no señor – it is not that simple.
i am afraid that the 'National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors' might have a different opinion about this.
you must not take those safety topics lightly – it may fall on your feet…
Hello Mr. Rossi,
browsing the eCat website for some new photos i found the Leonardo offer for just heat.
That is a clever concept, i assume there are a lot of applications where heating is only required during winter season.
And it provides a low threshold to become friend with such a new technology – instead of buying something 'unknown' one can rent it for 6 months and then decide to buy.
if someone is interested in just the generated heat – who is responsible for the safety aspects of a steam-generator ? Leonardo or the client ?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Do you already have pre-orders for industrial application of the QuarkX ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea:
Yes sir. I understand the need for the ERV contractually. But for us hoping for the brighter future that your tech brings the most important things are the facts. Happy customer, high cop, proof of process, and progress toward manufacturing are meaningful. The legal issues while now troublesome for you will soon be in the rear view mirror and you'll drag us all forward. The changes I envision are earth shattering. With cheap desalination the worry over drought and famine should evaporate. Without need for the costly infrastructure a manufacturing facility can be placed anywhere in the word and with vastly lower transportation cost it will be able to compete globally. The ecatx or quark coupled with the drive toward global wifi connectivity means a man can literally build a house anywhere in the world and live comfortably. Can you imagine the freedom of a self-driving electric car with unlimited range? I could load the family up on a Friday night and wake up in New Orleans on a day trip and wake up at home Sunday in time for church. I'm so eager for my son to have this future and your helping us get there.
Good luck and thank you.
John C Evans
Dear Andrea,
A few questions about the new plant sales, if you don't mind:
1. Where will they be installed ?
2. You mentioned many problems needed repairing during the 1 year test — do you expect these to have been resolved in the new plants?
3. Will these plants be low-temperature thermal E-Cats, or QuarkX?
4. What is the cost for a 1MW plant now?
5. Will a Leonardo staff member be on site to provide engineering support?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I hope your journey into the unknown does not end as tragically as that of Odysseus, because then, as now, only for a very few people is the pursuit of virtue and knowledge the motivation and the goal of their actions.
Take care of yourself, your team and your project!
Best regards
Felix Rends
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think that the research on course at Geneva, in the CERN LHC can give information useful to the Rossi Effect, sooner or later ?
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on 3 more orders of the plant. The customer must be satisfied. When do you think Leonardo Corporation can deliver these plants to the customer?
Warm regards
Dr Andrea Rossi
What's you estimation of the time it will take for building, shipping and installing the 3 plants at the customer's facilities? Is it doable before the end of the year or much sooner?
my regards
Dear Andrea,
I have an idea, maybe a crazy idea…
Can you offer a substantial discount to JM products on the 3 new Ecats if He agrees to put on his site a recap of the total enery bills before and after ECat? If this is possible and JM products agrees, you can share with us and the world the link to his web site and this could be a very good advertising…
What do you think?
Regards, Marco.
Dear Andrea Rossi, I hope the same destiny for you!
Wow the Italian genius from the garage to Obama
Washington Summit on nuclear safety organized by the White House, a Paduan engineer, Adrian Marin, 52, presents its revolutionary patent, a machine that is capable of purifying radioactive waste in 'water. His company, the Wow Technology of Padua has won a major tender to run in South Carolina an innovative process of decontamination of liquid radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. The Wow has indeed won the tender "2016 International Projects" launched by the US Department of Energy.
How did the idea come to Marin? He is working in his garage, with a "piñata" for water purification experiments. There the flash of genius: the process, unique in the world, it works like a magnet that attracts the separated waste water that eventually becomes drinking. In his process of purification there is no entrainment of particles, as in the other existing filters on the market, but attraction towards one pole! And then the water is separated almost "naturally" from the dross! The process has been tested for five years in Saluggia, Vercelli, where the deposit of nuclear waste and where Avogadro Wow was tested on a sample of water 76,000 times more radioactive than that of Fukushima. And now Obama and his Energy Ministry entrusted him with a job. (thanks to Andrea Rampado)
Clear regards
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on your recent sales of 3 1MW plants. Can you tell us if it's for the actual plant or the heat produced by them?
Thank you and wishing you continued success…
Peter Metz
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that, thoeretically, the so called Rossi Effect could also not to be connected with LENR ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I tink that at this point there is no more to talk of tests, measurements etc, but only of E-Cats in the market.
Dear Andrea:
Per your response to D; If the customer had an 83% or greater reduction in energy cost for the heat supplied by the e-cat that equals COP≥6, who needs the ERV? If they are happy that's all that matters. Even if it was less but still COP>1 that's proof of the effect and should silence doubters. Thanks for the insight.
Good luck and thank you.
John C Evans
Dr Andrea Rossi:
When the 1 MW E-Cat was in ssm the input of electric power was zero Wh/h ?
Thanks if you can answer,
Andrea Rossi
I want you to know I have been following you since 2011 and wish the best for you! If you would answer the following questions if you can, it would be appreciated.
1. Who paid the electricity bill for the e-cat during the 352 day test?
2. Was the amount of heat produced sufficient for the customers needs?
3. Was the customers need for heat approximately 1 MW? If no, what was the customers need?
4. Did the electricity bill correspond with measured performance of the e-cat?
Thank you for any answers you can share,
Andrea, have you seen this?
Cherokee and its 27 (!!!) business entities were investigated by the New Jersey Office of Inspector General in February 2008
"Cherokee-related firms and officers have contributed at least $267,600 to state legislative and political campaigns and at least $80,700 to federal candidates from New Jersey since 1999."
Dear Dr. Rossi
let's talk about a 6 kW electric power Quark installed in my apartment:
1) should it in any case be connected to the grid?
2) if yes, when 6 kW are not used, what happens? let's assume I am consuming only 4 kWh, the remainig 2 kWh are necessarily sent to the grid? (and therefore I need to set up up a contract with the distributor for he to buy my electricity)? Or Q is capable of modulating the production according to the need in any moment?
3) If not, will a normal car battery be enough to operate the Quark?
Waiting Q with impatience….
My best regards and simpathy
Dr Andrea Rossi
Did I understand well, that the E-Cat QuarkX will produce heat, light and electricity ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read from your enemies that they do not accept the results of the ERV because they have made different measures: but this is ridiculous, it is as if a team refuses the results recorded by the official referee because they have a personal referee that has measured differently !!!
Go ahead, Andrea, get rid of them and go on with the production of the E-Cat !
Dr. Rossi: We have agreed on one issue for five years. Happy customers will ultimately decide the fate of your new fire. That is why I do not understand why you cannot persuade the customer of the year long test to come forward and give his opinion of his savings using the E-Cats.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you report on the status of the robots used for production? Have any been delivered or set up?
Bernie Morrissey
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you working more now or when you were inside the plant during the 352 days test?
Just a curiosity,
Dear Andrea,
have published
with your kind answers.
I am asking:
what is more interesting technically than a catalyst?
Answer: an other, better catalyst.
For example an energy catalyst.
I define catalysis as synergy
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Somebody wrote that if the E-Cat really was making 1 MWh/h all people around would have been burnt or something.
Comments or are you gonna spam this ?
Dr Rossi,
Have you had an opportunity to read comments from blogger Sifferkoll.
Dear Andrea,
Can you tell us the address of the Customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat during the test ?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Since the 1 year test is over and the fuel changed, has any of the ash been analysed? If so, is it possibe to reveal the analysis?
Andrea Rossi, Koen Vandewalle:
In an earlier post, Koen Vandewalle asked "what percent of the 'Symphony' is produced directly in electricity".
Without giving a specific percentage: (other than 0 or 100%)
1: Does the 'Symphony' produce any of its electricity directly?
Or, in other words:
2: Does it produce all of its electricity indirectly?
3: Can the produced (or stored) electricity be used to support some of the input power requirements of the Symphony?
4: Have you finished a new "Unfinished Symphony"?
(Unfinished due to potential further improvements.)
Continuing regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I see how you are fighting like a lion against the behemoth Cherokee, that is moving all the power they have to try to steal your IP. This is a veritable Goliath against David duel…win for us, because we want the E-Cat manufactured and they want not to manufacture E-Cats, they want only to manufacture toilet paper, as you correctly say.
May God help you,
Dear Andrea,
Here is an article about how pinball machines were once illegal in New York City and how one man, overcoming the odds, performed a feat that legalized them.
You have performed an even more stunning feat with the 350 day test of 1MW plant. I'm eager for when the world can see the report so the Rossi Effect can receive the acknowledgement it deserves.
Hank Mills
Dear Mr. Rossi
The link http://www.leonardocorp1996.com does not work.
Try again. Or go directly to http://ecat.com/
Try, try again,
Joseph Fine
You has replied thus to one very recent question about the ERV test:
"The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode."
This basically says it all. There's no need to publish any ERV really
F8??? Could you you refresh me as to what F8 is to infer plz. I remembeer F9. Any other F*'s I should recall?
Dear Andrea Rossi
Let's talk of serious things.
After the results of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat are such plants for sale ? Where can we find the characteristics ? Are you already able to manufacture them, even if not in massive production ?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea,
How many pages long is the ERV report and how many measured data points does it contain?
You can surely tell us that
Work hard and warm regards.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
Really ?
Anyway, the bottle is open.
Cheers !
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
Can you give an idea what % of the symphony is produced directly in Electricity?
C: F8, but I've seen mostly A and sometimes B for some time, while experimenting. It works very intermittent, and it is hard to predict.
D: We have to make a test in a container for at least one year.
Are there still ongoing experiments in order to generate thrust? Does this seem a fruitful branch for the future, or is it more a side effect?
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
this is about your shortest interview ever:
Looking toward the next interview.
Hello Mr Rossi,
now that the performance-test is over and the world knows the brave, secret customer, can you share some photos of the whole story ?
Something like 'making of' ??
Some sweating, clueless technicians during installation – some photos of Andrea Rossi and team with an Xmas-tree on the eCat – some humorless, sceptic looking safety-inspector before 'permit to operate' was granted – all these are quite interesting to the audience and would not interfere with the arm wrestling in court.
greetings from the other side of the atlantic
Dear Andrea:
We trust to what you said about the litigation, because what you say makes sense, what they say does not.
You will win and we will have the E-Cat. They are interested only to sell toilet paper in change of gold, you are struggling to make real things.
We trust in you.
Thank you for your hard work.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said a true thing: what will count will be only your products on the market.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Is still in good standing and promising the QuarkX ? This is more important than the IH saga.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I admit the following video inspired me to come up with the name "E-Cat Symphony".
What do you think of "Nora's" musical debut?
With Harmony,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi, This is a bit off topic but it's interesting I think:
I guess you have already seen the interesting news about a nano satellite laser sail project possibly getting to the nearest stars in 20 years? Amazing to think this might be possible some day.
Whilst looking at this I read another article on the same site about e-sail technology.
"This concept builds upon the electric sail invention of Dr. Pekka Janhunen of the Finnish Meteorological Institute"
It looks very interesting to me and if I'm not mistaken I think I have seen someone with that name post here from time to time.
I can't help dreaming of a not to distant future where all these ideas and your technology are integrated someday.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How will you defend yourself and the E-Cat from all the lies IH is diffusing through their hatchet men and their powerful press agency APCO international ?
Are they generating damages to you and the E-Cat perspectives ?
May God help you,
Dear Andrea
IH is orchestrating all their puppet-journalist to discredit you with a mountain of lies, but do not worry: we all have understood their fraud against you and their investors, who gave them real money to have in change toilet papers instead your intellectual property and your technology.
You will win because in front of God you are right, they are evil.
God bless you,
Dear Mr Rossi. I noticed that in almost every web site/forum where your lawsuit with IH is discussed, some impostors pop up to discredit you and your e-cat with disgusting sentences about you and your work. I am sure you are aware of such disgraceful individual(s) acting in a way aimed to cover lots of powerful and unmentionable interests. I assume that you don't care much but a small drop of water continuosly hitting a hard rock, can create some permanent damage at the end…
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You are inspiring all of us for the fight against people much more powerful than you, to defend your invention and its real development for the advantage of all of us.
Dear Andrea,
If I remember well you got the idea of the ECatX during the (very short) stop you had in your work inside the container due to an hernia. After the only one day of convalescence you started to conceive the ECatX that granted small size, longer ssm, higher COP and, after some experiments, direct production of electricity.
I'd like to ask you if IH agents, that was around you in these days, helped you in the construction of the ECatX too ? My concern is that also ECatX secret technology is now well known by IH. Is it possible ? Is it sure ? Is it impossible ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Hello dr . Rossi,
I am sending an interesting article that talks about you :
"The big question is, is this for real?
Some nuclear experts who have been following the E-Cat developments closely point out that Rossi has "something", for it is hard to believe that the inventor is so naive as to think he could sell a total dud for $ 100 million."
Dear Andrea,
Jed Rothwell alleges that there is a second ERV of the 1 year 1MW plat test and that his report draws an opposite conclusion to the the one from the ERV that you described.
Does this second ERV exist?
Best regards,
Dr. Rossi, you and your Readers may want to Google:
cold fusion business line
Scroll down and click on:
Cold fusion: This time for real ?
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
Dr Rossi
.. once and for all could you confirm this:
Industrial heat personnel – had a hand in building the 1MW pilot plant. That IH had "Their" people there everyday of the 350+ day test.
Thank You,
Susan Appleby
Dr Rossi,
A concise and fair report on the IH situation from the Falls Church Times in Virginia: https://fcnp.com/2016/04/11/peak-oil-crisis-bizarre-twist/
Best regards,
Jim T
A link from India. They talk about Andrea Rossi and the E-Cat
Italo R.
Dear Dt. Rossi,
It puzzles me that IH now disputes the performance of the e-cat.
Didn't T. Darden and JT Vaughn oversee the e-cat validation in your factory in Ferrara?
Dear Andrea
The temperature of the Web dispute is too high but it is a way to cool it down:
I hope it will be used:
Dear Dr . Rossi, about Dr. Fabio Penon ( the ERV ), let me add that:
– he is registered in Italy to 'Order of Engineers of Padova' at No. 2311 in Section A ;
– his main field is that of testing and quality control of the industrial plants ;
Here is the link:
Dear Andrea
Would you consider this is a good summary of events?
The Peak Oil Crisis: A Bizarre Twist: https://fcnp.com/2016/04/11/peak-oil-crisis-bizarre-twist/
Once again I wish you successful and productive days.
John C Evans
Dr Rossi:
I read all the lies of Darden and of his hatchets of APCO are diffusing about the ERV and the plant. Their lies shine for their total lack of common sense: they say the ERV was not good, and they have chosen him, they say the measurements have not been good, and they had one full year to say this during the test, but said nothing, realizing the soure of their critiques only after receiving the bill, they say they did not replicate, but they got hundreds of millions of dollars bringing visitors to the plant where you were losing your health working 16-18 hours per day: IH stinks.
Never give up, Andrea, a crowd of followers will sustain you.
Dear Dr Rossi
I feel bad that your dealings with IH are ending up in court. There are many interests that will work to prevent you from bringing your technology to the world. I didn't think IH was one of those. Greed, corruption, and control will get to some of the best. I pray you have protected yourself enough to overcome your battles ahead. My hope for today is that you have chosen your attorney with the greatest care. Best wishes for all you do.
Dear Andrea,
After the extensive questioning from Soky, there can only be one conclusion why IH is challenging your IP and honesty. It is a shame of your science that you withheld and neglected to include within the IP and patent the key component, your stethoscope.
However, I still respect you once you amend your ways,
Dr Andrea Rossi,
If the domestic E-Cat will go in production (F8) will be possible a remote control of it ?
Thank you,
Dr Andrea Rossi
Can we have the following information about the ERV that made the report:
1- education
2- has he been chosen and agreed upon by both Industrial Heat and Leonardo Corporation ?
3- has IH been able to talk with him for any complint for all the 1 year long test ?
4- has the ERV experience in plants that produce steam ?
5- has the ERV experience of nuclear reactions ?
6- who paid the ERV ?
7- has he experience of validations ?
8- how old is he ?
9- whose were the instruments he used to make the measurements ?
10- who installed the measurement instruments ?
11- did IH participate to the choice where to install the instruments ?
12- did IH maintain his personnel in the plant during all the days of the test ?
13- did IH have the right and the possibility to contact the ERV for delucidations along all the test period ?
14- is it true that IH visited multiple times the plant in operation with their investors ?
15- is it true that they collected 50 million dollars from Woodford funds and initiated a 200 million business in China after theyr delegations visited the plant in operation ?
16- is it true that during the visit IH made also their investors talk with the director of the factory of the Customer during their visits, after which the investors gave them the money to be invested ?
Thank you very much if you can answer: your answer will clear a situation after Mr Darden has diffused information based on which IH was totally unaware of the fact that there was a test on course based on the agreement.
Dear Andrea,
Are you sure you do not need other investors, I mean professional investors ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am inspired from your courage: practically alone, against behemothes, in a business where you are circled by sharks. May the Force be with you.
Never give up, you have more followers than you think.
Dear Dr. Rossi, can you tell us the timing of mass producing of your first devices?
We are aware that the faster is the better. But how much time? Weeks, months?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the QuarkX today?
Dear Andrea,
In your opinion, what is the most authoritative text, paper, or document on the hydrogenation (hydrogen loading) of nickel?
Hank Mills
Dear Andrea Rossi,
There are multiple names that have been mentioned about the E- Cat such as 'New Fire', 'Hot Cat', 'QuarkX' etc.
I suggest the name E-Cat 'Symphony' since there are probably multiple effects going on simultaneously which are also time-varying (such as music).
Also, you could get different results or different 'sounds' depending on the "music" presented to the orchestra (design/preparations) and the skill of the Conductor and Control Systems designers/programmers.
Orchestrated regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Rossi,
Can you comment on this guess about the E-Cat:
A. 24-hour test: 1 x E-Cat = COP ~10
B. 1MW 352-day test: 1 x E-Cat as activator (mouse?) @ COP ~10 applied to 5 other E-Cats = COP ~50
Yes, but your answer speed may signify
your culture and education also
best regards
DrD you wrote.
>>>>In the IH patent that is being discussed I see nothing inventive<<<<<
I thing that Dr. A.Rossi patented new technology. But IH try to patent the machinery, 1MW E-Cat reactor, build according to instructions of MR. Rossi.
Maybe by this way they want to prevent Mr.Rossi to build and sale this kind of E-Cat reactors.
Can we have, when it is opportune to you, a photo of the factory where the mass production will take place, with robot machines in place or being installed?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
We already know that the one-year test on the 1MW e-cat has proven the technology, but we are still waiting for the official release of the ERV report. Is it's publication imminent, days or weeks away?
Although up to a few days ago we were saying that this is irrelevant to the roll out and commercialisation of the e-cat, since it's the market that proves the technology, now that IH has tried to derail the commercialisation progress, the ERV will give more power to your elbow.
How many engineers and scientists will be signing the report?
I wish you a 6-0, 6-0, 6-0 win against the bad guys.
Dear Mr. Rossi
I have to thank you since your story is a TV watcher time saving event,compared to "THE TWILIGHT ZONE", "007", "LOST", "DESPERATES HOUSEWIVES", etc…fictions.
I need half hour a day only whith your blog!
(publication expectation = 1%)
Best Regards
Dear Andrea,
In the IH patent that is being discussed I see nothing inventive. The only inventive step (the fuel) is already disclosed in your issued patent. What extra is described is well known to those skilled in the art.
This is very strange.
What is the purpose of such an application (Rhetorical question).
The experimental details are also very poor, making guesses and allowances for them. I trust the ERV was more precise.
Best Regards
Dear Andrea,
Till solid data will be available the info-war is too intense. See please
I made appeal to a friend who is calm, objective and wiser than me
Best wishes,
Dear Andrea
Thank you for what you have been able to share. I to find it interesting that IH would file a patent on a tech they consider failed.
Am I safe to assume that the certification for the quark is a safety certification like UL issues so that domestic operation of the unit won't make the homeowners insurance rates go through the roof.
Always remember when they cheat you and tell lies the best revenge is living well. Once again I wish you successful and productive days.
John C Evans
Dr Rossi,
Very best wishes for your success in this difficult situation!
1. Is now not a good time to demonstrate the E-Cat publicly and prove to the world LENR and the Rossi effect is 100% real?
2. If no, can you explain why a public demonstration is not possible or desirable now?
3. If yes, can you suggest a timeline for a public demonstration?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
since we have to expect discredit on the ecat ( that has already started) and the 'powers that be' will try to delay the mass production, I ask:
– When will Leonardo corp. be ready to receive orders ( i mean for the already tested 1MW power plant) and deliver in a few weeks?
– Is Leonardo corp already organized in this sense and ready or when it will be?
I think it is of great importance since from then all the discredits wil be of no importance.
Thank you and best regards,
Alessandro – Ecatnews.it
Dear Jeff Robs,
According to our estimations, the installation of such capacity would cost from 25 up to 50 thousand $
Best regards,
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Dear Andrea,
I wish you all the luck in court!!
1. Now you have lost your a major finance source for your exponential expansion, would it be an idea to do it by crowd funding?
2. You said, there is no need to wait until court decides. If I remember right, you are going to build your first E-cat manufacturing plant in the UK. This means that the first commercial products will be sold in Europe and not in the US as long as it runs for court?
3. Is there any chance that an independable group like MFMP gets the opportunity to test a QuarkX in the not so far future? (I am not sure if they want to though).
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi,
were you aware that the Securities and Exchange Commission Issued Administrative Ruling Against Cherokee Investment Partners ???
here is a link to Bloomberg Business News –
Kind Regards,
Janice Abrahams
Dear Andrea,
From what you have written, it sounds like the E-Cat X is under an extended test.
1. If this is correct, how long has the test been running so far?
2. At what point in testing will you be satisfied that the E-Cat X will be suitable to be used in a commercial product
3. What is your timeline goal for when will be able to demonstrate the E-Cat X to the public?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dr Rossi,
Just seen this interesting response by Mr Ian Walker maybe you could post this:
Hi all
Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select, on which to base
their Due Diligence, for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access, they
were so happy with his work, and that of the team they selected and that they
agreed for him to run; that they spent $10 million dollars as a result.
There is no wiggle room with facts they are when all is said and done facts.
And it is fact that IH were happy enough with Fabio Penon's
qualifications, experience and abilities spend $10 million dollars on
using him as their source of adequate Due Diligence for buying the
E-Cat License and seeing the E-Cat IP.
IH could at any time in the past few years have asked for him to
replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so, ipso facto by IH's
own inaction he was IH's choice for the ERV and they were fully
satisfied with him.
Kind Regards walker
Dr Rossi
Just seen this very interesting response on Vortex in regards to Fabio Penon and IH:
Dr Rossi,
If we are correct Fabio Penon – was the primary engineer that IH helped select, on which
to base their Due Diligence, for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access in fact ..
Industrial Heat was so happy with Fabio Penon's qualifications, experience and abilities
that they spent $10 million dollars on using him as their source of adequate Due Diligence
for buying the E-Cat License and seeing the E-Cat IP.
further from what we have seen IH could have at any time in the past few years have asked
for him to replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so ?
Thank You,
Brenda Abney
Dear Andrea,
Here is something that might make you laugh. It's my attempt to sort out and place into a context various nuggets of information I've found regarding the conversion of the alpha phase of nickel hydride into the beta phase using temperature and pressure to trigger the generation of excess heat. I'm combining it with my thinking on how the lithium may function in the E-Cat (and how aluminum may get in the way) to share some thoughts that may or may not be useful to those seeking to replicate the E-Cat.
I won't ask for thoughts or suggestions, but any memorable remarks you want to make would be appreciated — positive or negative! For example, bah humbug, that's balderdash, crikey, facepalm, or LOL would be just fine and appreciated.
PS: The document is the result of a few more late nights of me scouring over several different papers, documents, and websites while having conversations with fellow researchers who have became friends during this saga. My brain felt like it was about to explode, so I had to put something on paper to "vent the hydrogen" so a meltdown wouldn't happen in my head!
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The fuss between you and Industrial Heat is a sad thing. I hope you did not give away all of your secrets, that you saved some parts as an insurance in case they would try to cheat you.
I wish you good health and good luck!
Gunnar Lindberg
hello dr. Rossi, I am sending a link about an idea to provide power to your Hot cat in places where there is no gas or electricity .
When IH had you sign for patent(s) they were filing in your name, were you aware at that time that there were inventors other than yourself also listed on the patent(s)?
Dear Dr Rossi
I note an error in the IH patent application. On page 10 at 0030 they correctly calculate Ea using the difference between the final reading and initial reading on the genset. But on page 11 at 0031, in calculating the COP, they use the final reading only.
This would make the COP closer to 12.
Dear Andrea,
IH's patent applications reads like an experiment description that could have been written by a group of 12th graders for a school project.
On the other side, yours is written like what one would expect from a patent; moreover it is written in a way that shows years of experience dealing with the patent office. You seem to have a very talented patent lawyer.
Managing billions of dollars and building up an industry is a very different game. You will be much better off partnering with real industrialists on whose experience you can rely rather than fund managers who are bringing nothing to the table.
I believe that your first customer will be more than just a simple technology user. They will be your best partner in the development of the e-cat, in what will turn out to be a massive win-win situation.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you see the editorial Peter Gluck published today?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
How are going your tests and R&D with the QuarkX?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Today, Sunday, what are you doing ?
Curiosity Jack
Dr Rossi, seen on ECW:
Penon might find himself in the hot-seat about if he triple-checked whether Rossi isn't having the energy beamed in from aliens in outer space.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
From public documentation we read that
The secret customer test started on 19th february 2015 and ended on 15th february 2016.
The elapsed time was 362 days (First and last days included).
A) why sombody refers to the test as a 352 days test?
B) success goal was defined as 350 no-problem days out of 400. So the "problem" days were only 362-350=12 days?
C) you had still 50-12=38 "margin" days to play with, but till the very last day you were worried by F9. Why?
D) if the plant had been not personally attended by you, would you probably have lost some other day out of 38? How many? More than 38?
E) was your presence really decisive for the test success or, with the actual knowledge of the past, the test would be a success anyway, even unattended by Leonardo personnel?
Best Regards
Dear Andrea,
To my knowledge, IH have not publicly said that "they do not pay because you did not teach to them to make the plant". Were you inferring from the press release where IH said that they were unable to "substantiate" your technology? Because that statement could be interpreted in a myriad ways.
Best Regards,
Dr Rossi,
If Industrial Heat says that the reactor doesn't work, then why did they apply for a patent with Rossi's technology?
Dear Andrea,
Now that you have already revealed that the 353 day experiment has resulted in a COP:
a)greater than 1.5 – and this is good, please consider replications, usually COP- 1.2;
2) smaller than 758,327 -and that is disappointing a bit because in long range we have to arrive to infinite COP, total operational ssm is a must (Do you agree?)
I just want to inform you, that I have predicted COP 21. (it is on the Blog)
No more questions regarding COP
However I may ask you for a friendly advice re my future career.
I am a chemical engineer (BSc 1959,PhD 1983) May I now, at 78+ start with a new
profession, Techno-Prophet?
Anch'io sono come Julian !!!
Forza Andrea indici una conferenza stampa con accanto a Tè un E-CAT in funzione !!!
Come a Pordenone io ci sarò in prima fila !!!
Dear Andrea,
You probably omitted to post and answer my question because it was sensitive and not something you wanted to be seen which I completely understand and respect. Just in case it was an oversight,
the question was: is the "know-how" about how to produce electric directly, that came to you over Christmas shared with IH?
May God continue to guide and protect you.
As a long time supporter of yours, I regret that IH has chosen to breach their contractual obligations and cease to be a reliable eCat development partner. On the other hand, I am heartened that you plan to proceed on an accelerated basis to develop and produce the most advanced eCat models and that you seem to have the required resources to do so.
One potential speed-bump to production and sales that you have mentioned is Safety Certification (Safety Certification has been an insurmountable obstacle in the past). Given that:
1. Do you think Safety Certification is a significant risk to timely eCat (quark) production & sales?
2. Do you currently have the needed Safety Certification in process?
3. If not, when do you anticipate such certification being achieved?
Thanks as always for your openness and best wishes for you continued success.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Unbelievable that IH would do this application with a straight face! To be clear, were you informed of the filing or the publication of the patent? To the uninformed readers: there can be some time passed between the two.
Best Regards,
Caro Andrea , BUONA PASQUA !!!
Aspetto sempre gli E-CAT che ho ordinato a suo tempo !!!
Spero di averli presto in casa !!!
Ciao hello Giannino di Udin
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I have seen a tenth of patent applications made by Industrial Heat , with you as the inventor:
1- did you authorize the international patent applications and the EPO applications they made ?
2- I noticed that their patent applications confirm that they made the tests, replicating your Effect: therefore they are lying when they say that no replication have made
3- they have put in their applications a certain "Thomas Barker" as the co-inventor: but all the patent applications that have him as the co-inventor describe in all the apparatus and the method that have been described in all your prior papers, tests, third independent party validation tests, patent applications: it seems that the unique thing that they have invented is the "co-Inventor". This is frauds uopon frauds against you, or am I wrong ? Is this a replay of the Meucci- Bell history ?
Thank you for answering,
Dear Andrea,
We'll have to see how the legal case evolves. I wish you good luck with that. In the meantime, I'm interested to learn how you plan to proceed. You have indicated that you are in a good position and you plan to accelerate your production plans. Maybe you could answer one or more of the following questions:
1) How large is your Leonardo team now?
2) Will you continue to operate from the USA?
3) Does Leonardo plan to go in production totally independent now?
4) Do you still plan an announcement in Stockholm soon?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I would request my fellow readers of JONP not to discuss the pending court case and for Andrea to be very restrictive in his answers in this subject. Public postings are "discoverable" in the US legal system (i.e., the Court) and could be used against Andrea's interests. That said, I will ask no questions on this matter.
On another topic:
1. Is there a lower limit on the size of an eCat reactor, e.g., 1W of thermal power?
2. Is the desire to go to lower sized eCat reactor primarily driven by the desire to increase the quantization of the overall output? Obviously, more modules to be controlled means more control complexity but not necessarily a corresponding increase in cost.
3. Is there an optimal reactor size in terms of duration of self sustaining mode (SSM)? That is, as the reactor size is increased or decreased, does the SSM performance vary or is it essentially constant?
4. I would assume that a valid size for an eCat reactor would be about 1% of the total system output – that way you could easily control the overall output by "turning on or turning off" a specific eCat reactor.
a. Is this assumption reasonable?
b. Is this approach applicable to how you would envision such a system?
Dr Rossi,
this evaluation may help your readers understand the current events surrounding this controversy:
Janet Michele
Dr Andrea Rossi:
It appears that Woodford in London has a significant role in the steal of your technology: they are selling bonds with inside your technology.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
So, you're referring to something newer than this IH patent published in Feb. 2016?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Today Industrial Heat has published a patent application in the USA for a patent that is a copy of your description of the 1MW E-Cat. They say it works. But then, if it works to the point that they patent it, how can they say that they have not been able to replicate it ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Today in the internet has been published an application for a patent made by Industrial Heat, in which they copied your 1 MW plant: they result to be the Assegnee, you the inventor. They say in the text of the patent that they made it work and it works well, to the point that they have applied a patent for it. Now I understand how right you are: when they have to pay your bill, they say that they are not able to replicate your Effect, but in a document as important as is a patent application to the US Patent Office they say that the plant works well and that they made it.
If this is not a fraud, what is it ?
In past I was sceptic on you, but now I begin to understand that you are a patrimony and that we have to defend you.
Never give up,
At this point is there any possibility of you and IH reconciling outside of court and continuing your work together?
Without the 89 million from IH, how will you start the industrialization process? Do you have another source of financing?
Dear Andrea:
I just want to say that all the persons around me are your followers against IH. But what about Woodford ? Have they been involved in the scheme?
Dear Andrea Rossi, I dont want to comment here on the law case (if you are interested in my opinion you can read it here https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2990-Why-Cherokee-changed-its-tune/?postID=16593#post16593 ) but my question is, what is your future plan and what will happen if Industrial Heat pays the 89 Million $US? Does this mean, that they have fulfilled the contract and have the licences for the areas named in the contract and then business as usual, or what?
I know business is often hard, especially if there is a dispute, but in this special case, that reminds me to a blog buster thriller, I wonder if you see any basis for a cooperation with an licensee Industrial Heat in the future?
(by the way, if there will be a movie about your story in the future I would recommend Luc Besson director 😉
Dear Andrea Rossi:
The great community of Italian Emigrates in Australia backs you spiritually: win for us agaist those sharks ! And when your E-Cats will arrive in Australia we will be proud to buy them.
Go, Andrea, never give up !!!
Dear Andrea,
i'm a little bit disappointed reading here some comments regarding the italian justice and the distorted way of how others see Italy.
In particular, they say that is corruptible, and that you can not believe in it.
In Italy we definitely have a lot of problems, first of all to not knowing how to retain and leverage brains like your.
On Justice i can definitely say that it is slow and has too many levels of courts, but to say that is corruptible I consider it out of place.
Regards, Giuseppe
dear Andrea th Rossi I have been following the e cat story now for 5 years and have placed an order for 4 e-cat home heating units. will the law suite with I.H. have any effect on the sale of the home e-cats for heating? have the results of the 350 day test been released to the public ?
best of luck in court
Dear Andrea,
Is There Anyone that write hereby on JONP
That work with you?
Hello dr. Rossi:
I am sending a nice article!!
Rossi vs. Snakes – A Superior man vs. Inferior People – An Athlete vs. Envy & Hate!
Andrea why not add the E-Cats to Elon's production line? Just a thought to share with you!
An interesting automation line!
Also just finishing S Mayer's new book "Dark Money" about how the billionaires brought the USA recently. We will take it back this fall Andrea.
Enjoy your work & blog tremendously, keep the Cats moving forward for the Worlds sake!
I can't belive it.
I was waiting for the report release and all together was flooded with news I could not fit in my schema.
Then digging a little I found what happened.
It's really incredible. You trusted them so much and they are where they are…
Hopefully the US Judicial system is quicker and less corruptable than italian one.
I understand F7 so just wishing to let you know my (our) support.
Anyway, I guess you have free hands outside the IH licensed nations so this is a great opportunity to start selling in Europe.
Since they did not pay, is your licensing with them expired by default or you are hooked with the tribunals?
All the best, Gherardo
Dear Dr Rossi:
What are you doing today, Saturday ?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you open to sell commercial or manufacturing licenses ?
Dear Andrea,
do you think that certification is possible for E-Cat ?
In my business, legislation has changed recently (in 2013), and the new bottom line is that manufacturers really have to be capable (if demanded) to prove the safety of the products they sell.
Once the officers of the government demand proof upon reasonable doubt that the product could be harmfull in some corcumstances, then non-conformity with safety regulations is assumed automatically. Nobody wants to go into this situation.
This is difficult. Especially for products for which national or international standards do not exist yet.
I think that the full report of the yearlong test can be of extreme value in this matter.
The more I follow all your history, then the more a divine intervention is obviously exposed.
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
Are you going to continue to work with ABB for the mass production plant?
Dear Andrea,
I am confused by your statement "when we will have obtained the certification." Whose certification? What is their process for certification? Do you have an estimated timing for that?
Warm wishes,
Dear Andrea,
You mentioned you do not like to play with the bones of others. However, there are financial wizards that not only care not for the bones of others but also the bones of billions of lives on this ailing planet. There are over 4500 children dying daily from terrible dirty water and 30,000 children dying daily from the effects of severe malnutrition. The FWs must be informed of this before applying brakes to what can save them. There is a day of non-financial accountability.
With much respect,
Dear Mr. Rossi,
In how many Months do you Expect delivery of first commercial e-cat heat plant to European Customer ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
We descendants from Italian emigrates in the USA are about 50 millions and I am sure we all are with you in this battle against these chicken thieves that are breaking an allegiance with a giant to run away with small money. You fight, we take your back: we are proud of you.
Dr. Rossi:
Good luck on your upcoming court case. Justice will prevail. Are you still planning to attend Mats Lewan's New World Energy Symposium in light of the upcoming legal proceedings? I Believe it's vitally important that you attend.
Drew g.
Recalling "Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." Eleanor Roosevelt
In all these years many medium minds have tried to drag you to discuss events.
Many small minds have caused you to discuss people.
You, arguing always just ideas, you have proven to be a great mind.
The garbage will be cleaned by history.
Never forget that great and powerful forces want to kill your discovery. But you are not alone. There are very powerful forces that will fight with you.
For those who want to bother you, I use the words of our great poet Dante:
"Non ti curar di lor, ma guarda e passa…."
Dear Andrea,
Does your attorney allow you to lend reactors for independent testing? Since you now have a heat generator the size of a pack of cigarettes, this entire issue can be dispensed with quickly by putting a dozen of them in the hands of LENR followers. I would use it to heat my cold Minnesota garage (it is close to 0 degrees C today) while continuously webcasting inputs and outputs.
Warm wishes,
Dr Andrea Rossi
You are a rock!
Fight for us and win,
Dr. Rossi: Please release the report, do not let IH and the courts silence you for years
Dear Andrea,
Focus on work. You now have a happy customer and a stellar report from an ERV.
Next is to finish the test on ecatquark and start the mass production.
Best regards
Dear Andrea,
I found on internet blog that Industrial Heat has bought the patents of Miley for 25 million dollars…that would have been fantastic…but then I saw that they paid the 25 millions with shares of a shell company, not with money ! Here is what IH is doing: they are fooling the investors showing they have spent the money to buy IP, but in reality they put the money nobody knows where, while they are spending shares that are worth nothing at face value of millions !!!!!!
Andrea, do us a favour: destroy them for us in court. I wonder, though: which role is playing Woodford in all this scheme? Are they cheated investors or something different?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am totally with you in your fight against the IH cheaters. It was clear that they were buying other useless intellectual property to dilute your importance to the eyes of their investors, because they from the beginning knew they were not going to pay you.
Never give up, fight them and win.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
first of all, I want to reiterate my full support to you and your great team work. Although many people, like me, do not intervene often in your blog, I guarantee that we are very numerous and we never stopped to get passionate in your discovery.
About IH I only say that, for some reason, I expected some bad news: it was all too quiet about the discovery of the century. . . and the tranquility makes me suspicious.
For the rest I agree with you, it's time to come out on the market rapidly and decisively.
Viva Rossi!
Dr Rossi, Mats Lewan clears some of the smoke in the air with his new article:
Dear Andrea,
I tend to think of myself as a simple bunny. As a result I find myself somewhat confused. Perhaps you can help me to clarify my thoughts? I do hope so !
There is one team working exclusively on the current 1MW plant, another one (headed by you) on the E-Cat Quark X and one (or perhaps more) person(s) working on the jet engine.
Who employs whom?
I offer my deepest sympathy on the litigation affair. Very distressing!
Keep well. Jean Pierre
Dr Rossi – The ERV will tell the story. According to Industrial Heat they seen no value in the results and THEY will continue to research LENR with their shell companies; its clear that Industrial Heat intentionally violated your non disclosure and IP.
** If I were a Woodford investor right now I would be Very concerned.
Dear Andrea,
I have an F7 for you. "I cannot answer until my lawyers tell me I can"
Silent regards.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I want you to know that a big crowd has taken your back. We are with you.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
You think the E-Cat will cost same, more or less than a traditional domestic or industrial device with the same production of energy ?
Dr Rossi:
Is Leonardo Corporation thinking to make an IPO ?
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Can we be sure that you really have the force necessary to make the industrialization of the E-Cat after the clash with IH ?
Thank you if you can respond,
Mr Rossi:
How much probabilities we have that you present q QuarkX Cat in the market within 2016 ?
Dear Andrea, as you know I, as many others, have no doubts on the efficiency of your E-CATs, and I'm surprised that the HI wanted to "kill the goose that lays the golden eggs" but obviously they have their dirty interests. I strongly hope that your lawyers win. But I'm also glad reading that you can go faster without the HI brake, and the project to mass produce small systems that can be connected in series-parallel it seems to me very good and perhaps could facilitate the marketing authorization. Common people has a great need for an energy breakthrough enabling the independence from big lobbies.
Thank you.
Dear Andrea:
Today is not a working day, take some rest, play tennis with your wife, enjoy your weekend. You are under terrible pressure since more than one year, take care of yourself.
Dear Andrea,
Question: does the client of the 1MW plant have a say whether the report can be published? Can the client's name just be redacted from the report if the client does not wish to become public?
Best regards,
Dr Andrea Rossi:
In Sweden has been started the installation of the world biggest electric power generator that uses waves energy to produce electricity. It is being installed in the western coast of Sweden; manufactured by Seabased AB and operated by Sotenas Wave Energy, it works my means of the pull-push force made by the up-down movement of the waves, such force being exploited by means of a buoys system.
I think this can be of interest for the readers of this blog.
I understand that we are off-topic in this blog, but your reply is too interesting to be left open.
You apply the so-called "principle of mediocrity", which states: if a thing happened once, it could happen again with the same ease. Simple and straightforward.
Contrasted to this principle which, we must remember, is an a priori assumption, there is the "anthropic principle" according to which our existence unbalances any evaluation since it is the cornerstone not only of our history, but of the entire universe (see the fine book by John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, "the Anthropic Principle", Milan, Adelphi, 2002).
An "anthropic" description (which I prefer) rather than "mediocre" of events can certainly suggest the existence of a preconceived plan (natural or divine), of a ultimate goal. But things are more complicated… as always. Especially if we are dealing with events that occur in one case out of ten billions each galaxy.
Dear Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
Very interesting paper. Have you an idea of the cost of a prototype able to treat 100 kg/h ?
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Currently there are two sizes for nuclear power plants, L (nuclear ships and submarines) or XXL (for grid power generation). What is your prediction for the mix of sizes of LENR power plants in ten years? Perhaps these categories make sense or perhaps you have your own categories.
# of home / vehicle power sources (<25kw)
# of small distributed power sources? (<100kw)
# of light industrial power sources (<2MW)
# of heavy industrial power sources (<20MW)
# of light utility power sources (250 MW)
Thank you,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I have been away from JONP for awhile, so forgive me if I ask questions already answered.
Have the "fuel" contents of the 1MW reactor been isotopically and chemically analyzed? If so, results?
Any indication of tritium generation? How about deuterium production? Isotopic shifts from natural distributions?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Did your separation from IH slow down the expansion of your technology ?
Dear Andrea:
We all understood the dirt play of Industrial Heat, after reading the complaint made by your attorney John Annesser. They used you to collect 200 millions, then tried to get rid of you dwarfing your work, the same work that made them collect the 200 millions. Now they pretend to still have an IP, showing patents of your competitors that are worth nothing, to fool their investors. By the way, I saw in the internet that they paid these patents few hundred thousand dollars in cash, plus shares of a substantially empty box whose real worth without your license is zero, while the real money nobody has understood where is gone…I never saw a job more dirt than this, with Tom Darden playing the role of the gracious angel of the LENR who wants to help all the scientists , to hide the fact that he has made disappear all the money they collected from the investors and substituted it with worthless shares; by the way, I am curious to know who made the due diligence to estabilish the "fair value" of these shares… Please fight them, beat them and continue your hard, but fantastic work: I agree with the reader that wrote " LENR without Andrea Rossi" are nothing ".
You do not need their dirt money, you need your E-Cat in the market, that's what you need.
Godspeed, Andrea, we all will back you buying your fantastic E-Cat.
Dear Andrea,
We would like to express our sincere support in this difficult situation that has happened because of the shocking dishonesty of Your partners. We believe that the support of people from all over the world watching in what difficult circumstances you have to develop ECAT, will help You to overcome it
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov.
Dear Mr Rossi,
I will tell you a saga that you can learn from.
Around 1975 in USA a group of school-drop-outs started a company.. their CEO was "Billy" something. Their business idea was to write operative system (OS) for PC. Their OS was junk (and still is). Their business was slow.
But one the guys was smarter than the others…. He come up with the idea to make the software easy to pirate copy. By that a large numbers of private persons could install the OS on their home computers without paying anything.
When companies started to computerize that OS was their natural choice,.. as their employees already had that OS on their home computers and therefore didn't require any PC training.. This made the junk OS the "de facto" standard system for business.
Within some few years the school-drop-outs company had knocked out the competition, the competition was bigger and have more money and most of all …better OS. Today their CEO is branching out to LENR.
Dear Andrea,
I visited their website last night and noticed the similarity of their "Hydrogen Hot Tube" technology to the E-Cat, at least on the surface level after a casual review of the information provided. I need to review their patent applications in depth, like you suggest. Do you think Brillouin is utilizing lithium now — since that is really the key that has allowed you to produce significant excess heat from the very start of your work on the Energy Catalyzer?
To everything else, all I can say is, wow. I'm flabbergasted. For you to show them how to replicate, everything from the reactor body to the fuel itself, and for them to not pay up after achieving successful replications they showed off to investment companies and receiving an overwhelmingly positive report from the ERV: it's almost unimaginable. Again, I don't have access to the evidence Leonardo Corporation will eventually be sharing with the courts, so I don't want to jump to conclusions inappropriately. Without viewing what you have seen myself, I can't make the same judgments you can. But this is making the hair on my arms stand up! I'm glad you have meticulously documented everything. The persecution that you endured earlier in life has at least served one purpose: teaching you to prepare ahead of time for situations like this.
Hang in there and make sure you don't let the stress negatively impact your health.
Hank Mills
Dear Andrea Rossi,
No doubts, the experiments have priority in the research/developing of working devices, and a theory can come later. Nevertheless, the theory can help in experiments design. I would like to suggest to you a general theory comprising a section with possible explanation of LENR. I hope it can help you in your practical work. If you are interested, at which e-mail can I send the pdf file?
Best wishes,
Dear Andrea,
I think you now know why I have indicated to you my misgivings about dealing with a secondary distributer. There seems to be an unwritten rule among many of them to the effect of me first then the parent company,in my experiences.
Careful regards.
Dear Andrea
Reviewing the contract online it seems pretty straight forward. Validate the product with a cop>4 and steam>=100c. Once validated they pay you and get the IP. Without payment you keep the IP.
1.Do they not accept the ERV validation?
2.Do they accept the validation but refuse to pay?
3.Is the ecatx/quark included in the ip?
4.If not, do they not want to accept validation and have to pay for a 1st generation tech when 2nd generation in near delivery?
Once again I wish you successful and productive days.
John C Evans
Hello, Mr. Rossi. Some numbers of test results 1 MW unit allow to hope for successful resolution of the problems with Industrial heat. Try to worry less .Watch out for his safety.Not repeat the fate of Rudolf Diesel.
Wish you luck. Fedor.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I sincerely hope you triumph in bringing your E-Cat technology to all of the world. While nobody can say what will happen here, I am most comforted that you will do and give everything that is possible to make it so. If there is anything anyone of us can do to help please just say the word.
Peter Metz
Dear Andrea Rossi!
What is your customers opinion about the 1MW-plant? The customer must have had access to 8.500.000 kwh during the test, and be satisfied just to have to pay 1/6 – 1/50 of the energybill?
Something in Raleigh must have been very hot.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Considering that the e-Cats will be on the market soon, targeted for this year (what an achievement) can you supply me with a contact name and email of the nearest authorised seller for the Maltese islands (EU and Eurozone country)?
May God be with you and may you succeed and beat all your enemies, who are our enemies too.
Thank you
I'm so sorry this has happened to you too… I also lost a great sum of time and money by similar corporate ethics years ago…
What is the input energy source for the E-cat?
I' ll do my best to make you happy!
Warm Regards,
Not only me….! but also a few billions of humans ….!!!!
Go ahead and win
Greetings to everybody!
This is my latest creative endeavour: http://www.ioannisxydous.net.gr/
Ioannis Xydous
Dear Andrea
please go ahead as quickly as you can with the E-cat QX, that will be the winning production, and the most wide-spread product!!!
My best regards
Dear Andrea,
My personal experience is that if something bad happens, this may cause the beginning of something much better.
You always stated that COP was 6. Not more.
The "artificial COP" of INDUSTRIAL energy vs CONSUMER energy in Belgium is moreless 6.
I Explain hereunder.
I round the numbers to shorten the comment, and not to have to look it all up. Bookkeeping is not my cup of tea. But the spirit is correct.
Industry pays a gross price of 30 € / MWh
Consumers pay an all-in price of 200 € / MWh (moreless 6 times more)
Solar panels and other renewables of the "2008-generation", receive(d) 400 € / MWh subsidizing. That has ended now. That was necessary, E-Cat and LENR were not considered as viable by then.
Our contry has a historical debt of moreless 9.000.000.000 € because of this subsidizing mechanism.
This debt has to be payd back by means of new taxes implied on Consumers, NOT on industry for reasons of competitiveness.
Consumers can save on these taxes by isolating their homes, buy new heaters etc, etc.
It is obvious that 200 – 30 is used for other things.
This creates a whole new economic activity. GDP, if you like. Jobs.
That is how was solved, for now, the energy problem.
So there is no urgence now for your multi-MW, industrial E-Cat.
So if I do some math:
For the industry:
30 €/MWh * 24h * 365d = 262800 € per MWyear.
It will take 4 years to payback the investment if COP were +/- 50 and if one machine costs 1M€
*That is why I asked you for the cost of the refurbishment, yesterday.
For the consumer:
200 €/MWh * 15MWh (my consumption) = 3000 € or 250 €/month.
I can afford that. If it pays back, a loan will be an option for everyone. Mr. Draghi and Mrs Yellen, might not oppose, I believe.
In the developed world, the average consumer is wealthy enough to pay for the energy, or the embedded energy in the imported products. All conventional and renewables are competing now, so no energy can be sold above market value.
On the other hand: 100.000.000 for a license of your technology in the most energy consuming part of the world, was the price of 200 – 250 appartments nearby a modern city.
You know, as a friend, that this is not my opinion of how the world should be provided with energy. A way out is to be found very fast.
I am convinced that E-Cat should be implemented as soon and as much as possible, and that lots of fossil fuels and dangerous nuclear energies should be used only when strictly necessary and when they are technologically the better option.
Therefore: please deliver me as soon as possible my E-Cat(s). Your margins may be better on the smaller units. And early adopters pay some extra if they can afford it.
The rumours go that old Porches and Lamborghini's from the 70's and 80's are selling now above their original price. So we don't even take a risk for our grandchildren.
Your first idea, with the pre-orders was the better one.
Kind Regards,
PS: if my numbers are wrong, I count on our friends to correct or improve the math. I don't mention names because not everyone likes that.
"When the going gets tough, the tough get going."
You will win this battle and you will bring the ecat, your ecat, to the world and the fraudsters to their knees.
I will pray for you as I have been doing for the last years.
Un emigrato.
Dear Mr Rossi
One would of course check the following with your lawyer first.
If IH, as they contend, have given up on your technology, then you are free to license the US, Chinese, Saudi Arbian and all other E-Cat markets you licensed to IH.
You merely take the opportunity the court case provides to open the US licensing to any firm that wishes to produce E-Cats, or any other technology you invent.
Like Microsoft with windows you let any one build a an E-Cat they just pay you for the license same as PC builders pay Microsoft to pre-install windows. You then continue to improve the technology, every year same as Microsoft does with windows, You give free updates on a license for a couple of years then later versions require a new license of the latest technology.
Kind Regards walker
Gentile Dr. Rossi,
Tutta la nostra solidarietà nelle battaglie che sta svolgendo per la umanità tutta.
Gli interessi in gioco sono mondiali e estremamente alti.
La produzione di massa potrà rendere più difficile il compito di chi ha altri interessi.
Interessante quanto scrive Sifferkoll in http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/the-rossi-vs-darden-lenr-ecat-battle-not-about-ip-and-money-all-about-freedom-vs-control/
Alessandro di ecatnews.it
Hi Dr Rossi,
Can you explain the COP? It sounds like a ratio of energy produced
divided by energy used. If that is correct, what is the energy source
for the E-cat?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
please, don't spend your time writing here in JoNP. You have to do much important things in this period of your life!!
And all of us are sure that your products will hit the market much before every other concurrent.
(I already have my money ready to buy one of your cats, I am in your list from the very first days).
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I might seem a bit cynical, but why shouldn't we customers be happy that another company possesses the same technology of your E-Cat?
Isn't it how capitalism works? Isn't competition a good thing for us? Wasn't it a choice of yours to play this game?
Will we see E-Cats from Darden together with yours in the future? And if not, what shall we think?
Hello Mr. Rossi,
I am truly sorry for this new trouble. History repeats itself!
I'm sure you will overcome it. We all are with you!
Your invention is very important for the world. It will help populations of the world to reach peace, because it creates better conditions for all human beings. History repeats itself also in this: You are Italian, like many others in the past.
Keep up the great work.
My respect,
Alfonso Troisi
Dear andrea,
For 24 hours now, the words fail me so I echo the supportive words of all those who have already posted and repeat especially the words of Brokeeper:
"Thank you! Our support and prayers are with you brother."
Dear Andrea,
i am really sorry to read about the latest news on you and IH…we hoped it was a winning wedding.
I just want to tell you to resist and fight and your reasons will prevail.
I have only one question: will you be able to make public (together with the ERV report) the last year bill count of the customer in relation with the steam produced?
Thank you and keep the fight on
Neri B.
Hi Andrea,
this is the time of the wrestle in the cuckoo's nest.
In my opinion you should start to play the card of the brand: associating strictly your name to the E-cat in the main stream media, and make the Rossi effect well known to everybody.
If not will be so, the high availability of capitals of your competitors, step by step, will put your firm apart, and forgotten.
Best regards
Alessandro Coppi
Dear Mr. Rossi
I may have missed the ERV report. Was it published? If so, could you please give a link where it could be read?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Waiting for the publishing of Penon's report, could you tell use at least some of these things?
A) the name of the secret customer
B) the business of the secret customer
C) the temperature of the steam used by the secret customer
Secret regards
Dear Mr Rossi,
You have my sympathy and support regarding the Industrial Heat (IH) saga..
* Lugano report,
* Several US: patents,
* ERV report (ERV by IH choice)
.. OF COURSE ECAT WORKS !!!! And that why IH is trying to cut you off.
IH have planned this scenario from day one. That is why IH wanted a NDA to limit your future options and try to create a "lock-in" situation. IH never intended to through with this deal. By now you understand why IH took certain steps a year ago.
Dear AR
I am saddened to hear of your treatment by IH and others – love of money does strange things to people.
I hope you will still believe in the American people as predominantly: inventive, honest and hard working.
I would also hope that we, in the UK, will support you better than IH.
Greg Leonard
Is it possibile to clarify the role of JM Chemical Products Inc ?
Is it the actual secret customer?
If not, can you share the identity of the customer ?
Thank you.
Un abbraccio e in bocca al lupo!
Sei un uomo forte vincerài questa battaglia
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In this document it says that Henry W. Johnson, aka the President of Leonard Corp., is also the President of JMC. Did I understand correctly? http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf
Dr Rossi, questions on ECW:
1) Is this legal case going to affect the production of E-Cat X or Quarks or whatever they are called?
2) Is the production and appearance on market delayed? By how much?
3) Does Rossi need new investors and money to get the production started?
4) What obstacles other than remaining R&D are there now to get production and sales started?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Please fight for us: reading the press release of IH and reading your complaint everybody has understood that they cheted on you. Please fight, win and make the E-Cat for us: LENR without Andrea Rossi are nothing.
Dear Andrea,
I'm very sad for your fate to be defrauded by your friends. Even in this kind of situations, where the human side of a hero emerges, you showed us that the man inside is just as great. We are with you. Just ask.
I pray God to bless you
Marco Serra
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I have just read the court documents published by Sifferkoll.
It is very simple! WITH YOU ALL THE WAY!!
Best wishes as always,
Luis Navarro
Dear Andrea,
1. Did IH build the E-Cats for the 1 MW plant that achieved > 50 COP, including preparing the charges? Or just the 52 15kW modules and not the 4 250 kW modules? Or none of the above?
2. Please talk to Elon Musk. Just once, a short chitchat, that's all I'm asking. He's worth $13B and a genuinely good man who poured his last fortunes from selling PayPal into SpaceX and Tesla at a desperate time, when no one else would believe in him. He also experienced a 'Christmas miracle' where in the span of days both of his companies were saved from imminent bankruptcy. I see a confluence in your work ethic and humanitarian values.
Best Regards,
Dear Andrea,
Do you think Industrial Heat will mass produce a LENR device soon (within 2016)?
Best Regards,
Dear Andrea,
I now understand your past response "The (sea) monsters are still there, but we are not impressed: too much work to do to find the time to be impressed by the monsters."
Your personal courage and perseverance is as much an inspiring story as the impossible invention itself. Thank you!
Our support and prayers are with you brother.
Mr. Rossi,
They should be throwing a parade for you but instead try to steal every thing.
I know you will prevail. You have many fans and supporters.
God Speed
Dear Andrea,
When you state that IH has made successful replications, did they themselves prepare and process the fuel material to be used in the reactors — including catalyzers — according to IP provided to them, or did they simply use fuel pre-prepared by Leonardo Corporation?
Thank you.
Hank Mills
Dr. Rossi,
I pray for your health and safety as you deal with this challenge.
If you are right, the world will owe you a debt of gratitude.
If you are perpetuating a fraud, I admire your chutzpah! I just don't see how anyone could pull off a fraud of such scope, complexity, and detail.
So please look after yourself.
Jim T
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for that generous information. Again, you have my full sympathies.
One thing's for certain: a man in your shoes would never challenge such a behemoth to court if he thought he was going to lose!
Best Regards,
Dear Andrea,
There are going to be more replication attempts to re-produce the "Rossi Effect" in the near future. Typically, you reject, out of necessity, requests for any guidance or suggestions that could enhance the likely hood of positive results. Now we know that you assert Leonardo Corporation's Intellectual Property (IP) has been distributed to third party competitors. From what I've read, if the dispersal of IP has happened, this could potentially include a series of pending patents on various aspects of the Rossi Effect such as the fuel mix.
As you are aware, there is a significant number of independent scientists, engineers, and academics who, as non-competitors, seek to confirm and replicate the Rossi Effect. A few of them, such as Songsheng and Parkhomov, have produced fantastic results confirming beyond any doubt massive excess heat and even periods of self sustained operation. Many others, however, using the same basic methodology and sometimes the exact same sources of nickel and LiAlH4 fail to produce any measurable excess heat.
You're technology works. The many demonstrations you have performed proves it along with the handful of non-competitive replications by honest engineers showing kilowatt levels of excess heat. However, with a small amount of help there could be a new wave of replications — all with the intent of validating your effect to the world — that begins in the very near future and spreads like an epic viral video of hope and awe.
If you are correct and your competitors have already been given your intellectual property, is there any chance you could provide any measure of assistance to the honest replicators out there?
If not, I understand. I'm not trying to be rude or bothersome. But when yet another party claims that the E-Cat is unsubstantiated, it irks me to the core of my being.
Please consider helping start a wave of substantiations with a few bits of guidance.
Dear Andrea,
Keep your heading. After every storm there is sunlight.
Very good you played not only one horse.
With much sympathy as, I am sure, from many other readers.
Michael S.
Dear Andrea
esactly….Alma Mater Bologna was
Fouded around 1100 AD
Only after 600 years were founded universities in the USA.
Among the best students are people like:
Dante Alighieri, Torquato Tasso, Erasmus of Rotterdam, Thomas Becket, Paracelsus, Galvani, Righi, Guglielmo Marconi and many others.
In addition it has always maintained over the years (centuries) a high educational profile, including Prof. Focardi.
Mr Rossi,
OK, I accept your answer, but your job is in US.
Why US universities silence?
Best regards
Dear Andrea,
It baffles me as to why Industrial Heat would claim to have worked for "three years without success" to substantiate your results, while they themselves built the Lugano reactor that was found to have nuclear performance. Care to comment?
Best Regards,
If you've been outright lying to us about your relationship with Industrial Heat over the last few weeks, how can we believe anything you say to us?
do you think Alma Mater of Bologna-Italy
is in the list of the world major universities?
Best regards
(answer expectation = 5%)
Dear Mr Rossi,
"Robotized" factories play an important part of your production planing. Is Leonardo corp. the owner of these "robotized" factories. Or are the "Robotized" factories owned and operated by entities that "we" have not heard about yet??
Dear Andrea Rossi,
And the good news is: we're 3,5 years of R&D further. Lightyears (literally).
My hope, really, is that E-Cat QuarkX and E-Cat X run faster and smoother than the devices that are stolen.
One other question: How much would cost – in money or in energy- the complete refurbishing to new-state of the tested 1MW machine ?
I think in terms of EROEI (Energy Returned on Energy Invested). Of course, COP 50-60 is only in operation, but also the manufacturing of the machine has demanded so-called embedded energy. Most of that energy will be used tens of times. The energy cost of the refurbishment has to be taken into account.
I prefer things that can be repaired. (For QuarkX we make an exception ? : ashes to ashes, dust to dust)
What I really don't understand is: how is it possible to demand a year of testing as a proof ? It would have been much better to try and understand the physics behind the Rossi Effect.
Making non-stop test-drives with a car makes it impossible to study or improve the operation of the engine of that car. Unless one makes movies or soundtapes of what the mechanic says and what he does when he observes the car that is tested.
I'm a little sad, when I re-read the following:
Koen Vandewalle
December 14th, 2012 at 6:46 PM
Dear Andrea,
What did convince your Partner ?
Did they buy a prototype, or do some private tests in your laboratory ? It cannot have been tested for a long enough time, I believe. Some months ago, you stated that Hot-Cat was still prototype and R&D.
You kept everything very secret, even for your licensees. I found this a very difficult way of gaining trust of real big partners. In fact, it could have done the opposite.
This is strange. I really hope you are a happy man. In many ways.
Anyway: congratulations !
Best Regards,
Andrea Rossi
December 15th, 2012 at 4:30 AM
Dear Koen Vandewalle:
We made tests with the consultants and the engineers of the Partner after the signature of a contract with strong guarantees for both parties. I trusted them, they trusted me: their intentions were honest and my instinct told me they were not here to spy, but for real will of working with our technology. This fact cracked the nut.
Warm Regards,
Kind Regards,
PS: Orsobubu: Hehehe ! Still friends, and +1 for the non-capitalists ! There will be a time when capitalism will be seen as an ancient mechanism to motivate otherwise useless people to coöperate to provide goods and services for all. In an ideal world, hunger, need and greed will no longer be the motivators. Only boredom and futility will be lasting and harmless motivation. But to reach that world, at least we need infinite and abundand energy.
Dear Andrea,
I am curious about the thrust you have detected from the E-Cat. One of my interests, secondary to alternative energy, is exotic propulsion technologies. So the idea of a power source that can also provide thrust is fascinating to me.
1) Could the thrust detected be produced by any source of very high temperatures, such as the 1480C E-Cat X?
2) Would a "control" E-Cat heated to the same temperature with a resistor but lacking any "fuel" produce the same thrust?
3) Have you performed such a control run?
4) Is the thrust produced by the emission of particles from the fuel (such as alpha particles) or electrons from the Tungsten via thermionic emission?
5) Is the thrust produced internally due to an asymmetrical shaped reactor core in which electromagnetic radiation is resonating to a high Q value, like with the EM Drive?
6) Is the thrust produced internally due to some other effect, such as a strong capacitance that is creating differentials of space/time compression? Basically, like the experiments of NASA Eagleworks that may have detected a very weak warp bubble by sending a laser through a ring of capacitors. In this experiment space is compressed on one side of the ring and contracted on the other.
7) Have you tried to detect any gravitational and/or inertial changes in space time in close proximity to the reactor? For example, trying to determine if the speed of a beam of light (from a laser) changes when it passes near the active reactor?
8) Do you think there is any super-conducting effect inside the reactor that may be contributing to the production of thrust?
Thank you for any thoughts you can provide.
Dear mr. Rossi,
1. What is now your next move to commercial sales of e-cat Plants?
2. Any deliveries to Europe this year you think?
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
First of all, huge congratulations on the results of the 350 day test. The results that I've seen so far have greatly exceeded anything that I would have ever expected. Very impressive work!
Second, I wanted to offer my full belief, sympathy and support with respect to the legal action that Leonardo has initiated.
Third, a couple of questions, if I may, on the "ash" that resulted from the 350 day test:
1) Has that ash been analyzed & have you seen the results?
2) If so, was there anything new that you learned from the analysis, especially since this was such a very long test interval?
3) Anything you can share??
Thanks & all the best,
Dear Dr Rossi,
Do you have a back up plan for raising the money needed for the industrialization, that I guess were expected from IH?
Dear Andrea Rossi, thx for your answer, I personally wish you good luck defending the finance wizards. Best regard Felix Rends
Dear Andrea
Congratulations on a successful test run. With your press release yesterday, lawsuit aside which I'm sure will be properly litigated, fascinating facts were revealed. Averaging a COP of > 6 over a year should put the academic skeptics living off the hot fusion funding on notice. The energy sector should begin to react also and possibly already has. And occasional COP up to 60 is wonderful.
Taking into account the efficiency of converting output to electricity what cop is needed to reach ssm?
Good luck in the future as we all await the first production run of the Quark.
John C Evans
Dear Andrea,
I am fully behind you in getting justice regarding your contract with your licensee. It is a shame that while you were tucked away 100 hours/week in a shipping container, worried about your health, someone would take advantage of you. Godspeed!
On a more positive note, I would like to share my vision: a city where all cars are transportation is self-driven, environmental-friendly, cheap, powered by e-cats. Nobody would need to own a car, and everyone could just use their smartphone to reserve transportation. I am thinking of a combination of Uber/Tesla/Google/Leonardo technology.
Now imagine what happens when we replace individual cars with self driven taxis. The need for parking area will effectively go down to almost zero. Those can be replaced with gardens, parks, food production, pedestrian space, cycling lanes, etc.
I might decide to go back and live in a city if this happens.
Dear Andrea,
i'm really sorry about the litigation you have with IH, let us know if you need to fight some one, we are a muscle man!
Lets try to relax a little bit trying to answer an intriguing question i had with my friend:
The E-Cat and the so called "Rossi Effect" is a DISCOVERY or an INVENTION.
Best regards, Giuseppe
Dear dr.Rossi, I am happy to read that Ecat production is going to proceed as planned. Yesterday after reading the news I was concerned that IH payment was fundamental in order to pay the expenses for setting up mass production. Can you confirm that Leonardo has the financial resources to continue on his own? Thanks and good luck with your lawsuit
After Cristoforo Colombo, Enrico Fermi…
The Italian navigator has just landed in the new world : Andrea Rossi.
Dio ti assista.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I got this info related to the ERV:
Name: Fabio Penon
education: doctorate in nuclear engineering with 110/110 summa cum laude at the Alma Mater of Bologna-Italy
experience: nuclear engineer in a nuclear power plant; professional certificator
This ERV has been agreed upon between Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat, due to his experience in nuclear engineering and certification purposes
He has been paif 50% from Leonardo Corporation , 50% from Industrial Heat for his job of ERV.
Is this all true?
Bes Carrier
Dear Rossi
Let the court to your advocate
Now that cop is public it is a run against time.
Dr. Rossi, why doesn't CornFused's Multi-Billon Dollar Company believe
Dr. Andrea Rossi, The United States Patent Office, A Team of World Famous Scientists who completed a successful Test, not to mention a few thousand Readers, who have been watching Dr. Rossi like a Hawk every day for 5 years, and believe in him 100%, buy one Unit, and if successful buy the other 299 Units ?
Instead they are losing money every day, sitting on their…..chairs waiting for MORE proof.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
Godspeed Andrea!
Dr Andrea Rossi:
So the program to manufacture the E-Cat in massive quantities goes on, even if this litigation will take long, as usual?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I am so sorry to hear about you legal action, but I have good confidence that you will overcome this hurdle.
Will this situation slow down the manufacture process of your E-CATS?
I wish you all the best.
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Dear Dr. Rossi,
What's going to happen to the pubblication of the report, with the recent litigation on course ?
Dear Andrea,
If I may ask… how is it possible for you to be confident that there won't "be any delay in the commercial release of the E-Cat technology as a result of the lawsuit"? Lawsuits are not cheap. Production on the order of millions of pieces of equipment in a robotized factory is not cheap. I hope you will have other sources of MASSIVE financing…
Prepare for lots of "sunlight" after one year of living in the plant…
Best Regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi, next to all the hype around your patent litigation in matters E-Cat, I would like to ask you what is your own personal view on issues such as social responsibility of inventors, entrepreneurs, investors? Best regard Felix Rends – Moderator – German Section of http://www.lenr-forum.com
Dear Andrea Rossi.
Many have compared the story of LENR and also your own personal story to an epic saga with all the diversity of situations and characters there in. But It is also real life with real people and their real concerns. We who are looking from outside can forget that sometimes.
I suppose it is normal sometimes that disagreements arise and issues need to be resolved and its the right thing I think to let the due process take care of those issues. Where business opportunity and honour and truth are in conflict I always hope honour and truth wins out in the end.
Even if these times are tough, I do hope it resolves itself efficiently and you are able to relax again and focus on your amazing work in the days ahead.
Best Regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi.
I wrote e-mail with my complete adress to firstname.lastname@example.com, as you requested, but I didn't get any answer. I send it at 25th October twice and 4th November once (all are different). I'm worried my e-mails was lost because some spam settings. Are they get to proper hands?
Warm Regards,
Jaroslaw Huba.
Dear Mr Renoir,
It is logical that for global transformations, especially in such important field as the energy field, all factors should be taken into account – environmental, economic, political and social. I agree with Andrea Rossi, who sees also problems in complete and immediate transition to new energy type, and not just advantages. For now, only Andrea Rossi has full information about the potential of the new energy source, and what consequences may have inconsiderate strategy of its implementation. As for nuclear energy and nuclear reactors, even taking into account it's disadvantages (risks of radiation accidents, and radioactive waste), they will be able to continue to perform useful functions in future, such as, for example, non-destructive control, the production of isotopes for diagnostics or treatment of cancer. Of course, it can be quite other nuclear reactors to perform these tasks – so-called hybrids (working in conjunction with the accelerator) and subcritical reactors (reactors without risks of uncontrolled power acceleration).
Best regards,
Vitaly and Irina Uzikov
Mr Rossi,
I would like to thank you for inspiration. Three years ago I wrote to you about E-CAT business – at that time fruitless. But I didn't give up, I simply go forward in a way I can go and I want to go, in a "Rossi" way – means work, work… Today I become qualified electrician and I'm feel satisfaction with my work. All thanks to you example of hard work, which is always profitable.
If it is a way and need to work for Leonardo than let me know. In the mean time I will continue my path.
For me personally F8=>positive
Best regards,
Jarosław Huba
Dr. Rossi: I do not understand, you are very pleased with the results of the year long test which I assume means the test was very economically favorable for the customer, why not simply "massively produce" the E-Cat used in the test? You remind me of my favorite sculptor, Giacometti, he carved until his wife had to take them away from him because "they became as thin as nails and reduced to the size of a pack of cigarettes". (:
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I work for a multinational conglomerate. I've pitched your 1MW plant to my superiors, but they took a wait and see approach. This approach may seem prudent to most but I see it as getting behind the eight-ball. What evidence is there that I can present to them that will convince them of your inventions operational validity? This would be huge for both parties, as it would be 200 to 300 hundred plants for you (possibly more) and huge utility cost savings for them. Do you have a presentation ? I've looked on your website and don't really see anything of that nature on there.
I must change my heating system this year …. can you send me one Domestic X-CAT before next winter ?
Ooops … I read now that friend Andreas Moraitis was very annoyed of my mistake, and rightly so because it was 2am and I was wrong to state his name, he was only replying to a previous commenter, barty, which now I'll have lost friendship too.
So I apologize, Andreas not only speaks italian, but he's perhaps the most serious, accurate and informed in its contributions to this blog on a multifaceted issues (now I lost the friendship of Koen, Pekka, and many others), Andreas for example is one of the few enthusiasts also on philosophy, I remember years ago a thread (to which I contributed myself) about the epochè, in which Rossi told a very funny story happened during the discussion of his doctoral thesis on relativity and his favorite philosopher, Husserl:
"the reason why Husserl's Importance for the scientific approach to any issue (remember he was originally a physicist and a mathematician) is not well known is two to the extreme difficulty of his texts. Husserl to read is one of the most difficult tasks you can imagine under the intellectual point of view, Also Because His German language is very difficult to translate, translations and usually you lose part of the meaning he wants to carry With His words. I had to take lessons of German language with a specialist, to study German in the "Ideen zur einer reinen phaenomenologie phaenomenologischen und Philosophie" (I wrote improperly 'phaenomenologie' Because I have not the dieresis to put on the 'a') and only reading in German I could understand what he wrote. Also in this case, even if in the exam of Theoretical Philosophy I gave it on Prof. Enzo Paci granted me in 30/30 cum laude, I was and am convinced That I have got only a fraction of it. It is huge but very difficult; you have to stay hours on every page, otherwise its content flows on the surface of your brain like water on granite. P.S. The translation into Italian of the "Ideen" Has Been Made by Prof Enzo Paci: when During the exam I Told him to understand Enzo Paci That I had to read Edmund Husserl he laughed like crazy"
Pondering about all of these recent events, I was considering an aspect usually neglected by followers of the blog, which mainly are interested in theoretical, technical or economic issues related to LENRs. I was thinking about the consequences on social and interpersonal relationships that the development of such a technology could bring among people, as previously said by this commentator, of which I'll soon surely lose the friendship:
"Gian Luca
April 5, 2016 at 2:37 AM
A little thing … .. the advent of technology and LENR ECAT not make it Necessary to use the much annoying summer time … .. means specially for the little ones. This is to mean That our customs and traditions will never be the same … "
I was therefore considering the effects that even THE SOLE POSSIBILITY of the E-cat existence brought on my personal social relations, and I must say they are catastrophic, or indeed CAT-astrophic, as Mats002 says, a friend on ECW E-Cat World site, of which now I'll also lose the esteem very soon.
My family, for one thing, is somewhere years considering me weird on this aspect, or otherwise weirder than before, because every time I try to involve or interest them (without any success) in this matter, well, I do not mean that the orsobubu is kept at arm's lenght, but certainly they behave as if I had told them I believe in ghosts, wizards, UFOs or the spontaneous regeneration of limbs. Moreover, my father is invested in oil and he doeesn't like to be said the sector has no future whatsoever. At work I have several clients in the field of architecture, construction and building renovation, an industry that is going through a period of severe crisis here in Italy, and several of them have taken the plunge on courses and services in energy efficiency; the sole reason the orsobubu mildly doubts on the validity of investing in solar panels, geothermal energy, etc. drive them crazy.
Again, I have many friends who are researchers, teachers or simply science and technology enthusiasts, and I found a strong skepticism on the issue, so even with them, especially those professionally involved, eg teachers, things are no longer as before. I also have several friends politically coming from the democratic left, highbrows, environmentalists, vegans, animalists, etc., and I found that, with them, pushing the possible virtues of a new nuclear power system to be installed in the basement of their house is worse than sing the praises of Hitler.
On LENR specialized forums the orsobubu is simply hated and derided by many, for the fact that I was among the first to question their certainty that automatically LENR could lead to diffuse wealth and worldwide peace in a new age of prosperity. Indeed, I have long since ceased to intervene on hardcore politics because my comments went moderated, but more usually the orsobubu is still accused of being "a barfing up dysfunctional personality with mishmash of turgid high-falutin' sounding verbage, Marxist gobbledygook and Communist theoretical bafflegab of zero meaning". In short, I'm treated like a dangerous revolutionary.
About my real-world fellow revolutionaries, the relationships are paradoxically even more strained, and I'm most treated like a dangerous counter-revolutionary instead, thinking of putting idealistic ecologist instances in front of class struggle; impress upon them that the era of oil and atomic fission (seen by them almost with reverence), with all financial and geopolitical interests connected, could be on the threshold of an epochal upheaval caused by cold fusion, and that the classical doctrine of imperialism would need an urgent hotfix, it's like an ideological backward somersault before the Enlightenment, when the king raised the drawbridges and knights roamed around the districts.
Just orsobubu's female friendships are in good shape, as generally they do not go to the bottom of the matter or they don't grasp very well the question, it's like they are glad talking about something resembling the name of a little furry cat
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you comment the press release of your attorney?
Dear Andrea,
I'm very sorry to hear about you being double-crossed. Hard to find people of character in this world. I know you will not publish this comment, just wanted to show my support privately.
Best Regards,
Dear Doctor Rossi,
Does Leonardo Corporation hold any American manufacturing &/or marketing rights for any of your technology………independent from Industrial Heat LLC?
If not, then why is Leonardo planning to build a robotic manufacturing plant in the U.S.?
Best regards,
Iggy Dalrymple
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the lawsuit. As I informed you earlier, big sharks are coming for your invention.
You might never succeed with launching the ECat publicly unless you understand the priciples outlined in the documents that can be downloaded here: https://ordoabchaogame.wordpress.com/
Faithfully Yours
Rip Van Winkle
Dr Rossi, with COP over 10+ we would expect IH to settle this matter in your favor soon enough and all parties to move forward.
Best Regards
Dear Dr Rossi:
IH has bought inconsistent IP from your competitors to justify the money they got from their investors, but their investors gave them the money because they thought IH is your licensee. Obviously IH made this not to pay you. You are in the right. You will win, because you are right.
Your complaint is terrific, now we understand that while working 18 hours per day in the plant you had also to fight against they who would be your backers. They got 60 millions from Woodford Funds: where is gone this money ? Their investors surely will be happy to know that IH has no more your license, but have the patents of your competitors none of which has ever made anything able to work. But: how could they, who were your exclusive licensees, buy and finance the technologies of your competitors ? That is absurd.
You have a crowd of followers, just let us know what you need from us.
I liked the last two lines of the press release of your attorney: Leonardo Corporation will not be slowed in his activity by this suit.
With admiration,
To all,
Rossi is not proposing some exotic type of thrust.
A Jet engine is just an internal combustion engine. At the front inlet, you have a compressor that compresses air to a high density that's channeled into the combustion chamber. At that stage, a mix of fuel and spark generates heat that rapidly expands the compressed air which exits the nozzle, thus thrust.
The key element here is the heat produced by the fuel that can be applied from any high temp heat source that transfers it's energy quick enough. This could possibly be supplied by the E-cat X eliminating the fuel propellant.
Note the fuel as a propellant is only in it's heat generation. It is the mass of condensed air which rapidly expands when heated that provides nearly all the thrust, the fuel being a miniscule part of the total. Jet engines can throughput a "ton" of air per second.
Dan C.
Dear Andrea,
here we are, Meucci-Bell once again?
sad regards
To understand how a LENR works, you need a new atomic model.
The new atomic model can be found at https://sites.google.com/site/earthbiblical.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
This Phys.org article should be interesting to you and the readers.
You may have seen this article before in your reading.
Researchers develop formula describing ghostly transfer of heat
April 5, 2016 by Adam Hadhazy
The sun's warmth crosses millions of miles of empty space to create a summer day; a campfire roasts marshmallows from several feet away. Scientists have understood the mathematics behind this ghostly transfer of heat since the late 19th century. But that math breaks down at very close quarters—within, for example, nano-scale electronics and solar electricity cells (with components separated or spanning billionths of a meter) where heat transfer is critical.
In a recent study, a researcher at Princeton and colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have come up with a formula that describes the maximum heat transfer in such tight scenarios. Surprisingly—and encouragingly—the formula suggests that a million times more heat transfer is possible between close objects than previously thought.
"We now have a ceiling for how much heat transfer we can expect," said Alejandro Rodriguez, an assistant professor of electrical engineering at Princeton. "The fact that this ceiling is several orders of magnitude higher than has been previously demonstrated in existing material structures is extremely promising and will motivate further studies of this phenomenon and its many applications."
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-04-formula-ghostly.html#jCp
Hope this information may be useful.
Thermal regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Dr Uzikov & Dr Uzikova:
What do you think, as experts of the matter, of the fact that Andrea Rossi continues to say that all the energy sources, included the nuclear power plants, have to be saved and integrated, instead of substituted with alternative energy ?
JC Renoir
Dear Dr. Rossi,
You reiterate that your technology will be integrated with all the existing energy sources – but do you at least believe that it can eliminate the need for traditional nuclear power plants in the foreseeable future? If so, it would be a huge contribution to global peace and security – more specifically, to the cause of nuclear nonproliferation. Countries that seek to acquire nuclear weapons – such as Iran – justify their nuclear programs by saying that they only pursue peaceful nuclear energy in order to meet their growing demand for electricity. If the E-cat technology can make nuclear power plants obsolete, there will be no further need or justification to pursue unsafe and environmentally damaging nuclear energy programs as a cover for secretly developing nuclear weapons.
Best regards
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry delivered a speech, entitled "Remarks at Bloomberg New Energy Finance Summit" in the US Department of State's website, in which he states:
>>Let me be clear. Government can provide the structure, the incentives, the framework. But I know – and so do you – that it's the private sector that will ultimately take us to the finish line. And it will be the private sector – innovation, entrepreneurial activity, maybe something we haven't discovered yet – the breakthrough on battery storage, a breakthrough on a clean fuel burn – I don't know what it is, but I trust in the ingenuity and the capacity of the American people and of our allocation of capital and our capacity to make this work.<<
The full speech is found here:
In my humble opinion it is the opportune time to drop John Kerry a line, or send him a post card. Bette still, send him a working prototype of the e-Cat x Quark. I'm sure it will make him very happy (although he would have a big problem telling his wind turbine and solar panel manufacturing friends that their tax-gobbling time is up, although in his speech he did say so much, but in a nice way.
Dear Mr Rossi,
You often refer to a "robotized" factory with a HUGE output as the main production asset.
1 What does a "robotized" factory cost??.. total investment.
2 What number of auxiliary and maintenance staff is needed to maintain 24/7 operation
3 How much of the content in % will be handled by sub-contractors ?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
You have mentioned that the E-Cat X can generate both heat and electricity. It occurs to me that if the E-Cat X only generates heat, and that the heat radiates from surfaces at a sufficiently high temperature ( >1200 C ), then recently improved thermal photo voltaic (TPV) technology could be used to convert the radiant heat to electricity. When you talk about the E-Cat X generating electricity are you referring to combining it with TPV technology or is the electricity generated directly by some other means?
It is reported that TPV systems can have efficiencies > 33 %, and I assume the E-Cat X has a thermal COP of > 6. The electrical COP of a thermal E-Cat X combined with TPV components would be > 2. Such a system could operate without any external electrical power source, and produce a useful amount of excess electricity. While considerable engineering effort may be required to develop such a system, I could envision such a system providing heat and electricity for my home. As a concept does this seem practical to you? Do you have an even better solution?
A public demonstration of a small scale prototype of a combined E-Cat X / TPV system operating for an extended period of time (1 month?) without any electrical input would convince even the most hardened skeptic of reality of the E-Cat X device.
Later this year, when I hope you might make the E-Cat X available, I am sure that a number of engineering schools would love to attempt such a demonstration. What do you think of this idea?
Dan Galburt
Dear Dr Rossi,
If I understand well, your main work is currently focused on the new reactor "Ecat-X", but what about the first Ecat (10kW unit for heating home) did you abandon it ?
Dear Ing. Rossi,
Things are now moving very fast and with great enthusiasm by you and your team. As I understand, you have plans for the first public demo of an operational E-Cat-x-Quark and production roll out. I wish you good luck with your venture after so many years of heart wrenching experiments and negativity from the defiantly denialist media and scientific bodies.
Permit me asking you two question:
1-Will this year see the first commercial sales of the e-CatX Quark, industrial version?
2-Will you have a commercial unit for sale maximum rated greater than 20kW but less than 50kW electrical output?
Mr Rossi,
what do you think about mass media silence reasons % ?
1) Main universities verification lack
2) F&P experimentations history
3) Your old judicial issues
4) Mass products absence
5) Other reasons
Best Regards
Dear Andrea,
About propellantless thrust in a fluid (water). If the E-Cat produces pressurized steam you can lead the steam into the center of a cone that is filled with and in water. First the steam will push the water forward before collapsing (imploding) back into water phase, due to the lower temperature of the surrounding water. Then water from behind will be sucked forward into the space that a while ago was filled with steam. We have now designed a pump with no moving parts. The tricky part is to find the optimal form of the cone/spray nozzle. The efficiency will be about 20% (heat to thrust) but all the heat will be transfered into the water so the pumping will be for free if your intension is to heat the water anyway!
This method was originally patented by an australian as a boat drive. But todays steam generators are heavy and clumsy compared to an outboard engine with the same power. But if you take into account the weight of the fuel for a long distance trip, an E-Cat driven boat with steam thrust propulsion would be much lighter.
However the owners of this patent a Brittish company Pursuit Dynamics Inc then started to use it in the food and beverage industry for mixing, heating and pumping fluids in one step with no moving parts, only steam (sterile). After trying to sell the idea to Proctor and Gamble, Persuit changed the name and business to Gaming Realms Plc, and I don´t know if they still own the patent.
Best Ragards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Dear mr Rossi,
Since you have recieved the report and you say you are satisfied:
1. Are you now able to handle orders of 1MW heat plants?
2. How many weeks from date of order to delivery of plant?
3. Will the guaranteed COP be changed based on the ERV report?
Dear Andrea,
He, he, he, lol!
Clearly, I am thrilled that you have focussed your R&D on boiling eggs however, somehow it seems to me that Proust is less interested in that (if he would have lived).
Maybe you can whisper us some other interesting revelation that would have interested him?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The "quotes" in the post made by reader orsobubu on April 4th 2016 at 5:14 PM which contain my name are fakes. May I ask you to delete that comment, or at least the parts in question? Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Andreas Moraitis
Dear Andrea:
If the ultimate goal is domestic household and mobile production of electricity do you expect there to be a complimentary fleet of entrepreneurial small businesses dedicated to the sales, installation and service of the Ecatx/Quark units? Or does your business model incorporate end user interactions?
John C Evans
Andrea Rossi,
Orsobubu asked if the COP was less than 758,327.
Even if the COP equals (or exceeds) 'only' the cube root of 758,327 ( or 91.191 ), that still would be a tremendous achievement.
Whatever the results are from the 350 day 1 MW test, do you think results from a similar test of the E-Cat QuarkX (or QX) would equal or exceed those of the E-CAT 1 MW system?
Best regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear A.R.
A little thing ….. the advent of LENR technology and ECAT not make it necessary to use the much annoying summer time ….. means specially for the little ones.
This is to mean that our customs and traditions will never be the same …..
Dear Andrea
Can you confirm if the Rossi effect produce muons ?
Warm regards,
Sverre Haslund
Dear Andrea
I'm not an expert in the field but I'd like to ask you if "propellantless thrust" means a way to get thrust without exploiting the third law of motion that is moving forward without throwing back any of material ?
If you can disclose something about the timeline of the agree with ABB ? When will ABB be able to complete robotized assembly line ? How many pieces per day (just an order of magnitude) will it be capable to produce ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Dear Andrea,
Fully surprised I read you that are trying to develop some thrust with your QuarkX. The wonders of the apparatus seem to increase by the week.
Can you tell what made you think that it can develop thrust? Was it because:
1. You widnessed some movement or force.
2. The developing theory suggests this will happen
3. Is there any chance it will produce golden eggs as well? 😉
Thanks for keeping us up too dat with all these exciting developments!
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When do you think the industrial E-cat plant will be on sale on a larger scale?
Feedback from the happy customers will be the best promotion for your technology.
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
@Orsobubu: Please be so kind to abstain from posting invented quotes. I did not write this nonsense.
Dear Andrea
sorry to bother you again, but could you clarify if the thrust you have mentioned can be obtained indirectly (for example using the electric power generated by the ecat-q to drive an engine) or DIRECTLY by the ecat-q?
Many thanks and regards
Dear Andrea
In reference to Giovanni's question and your response. I think there may still be some confusion with translation.
Giovanni is trying to determine whether the 'Thrust' you are getting could create a new type of propellantless thruster. There is quite a bit of research on thrusters which do not require propellant at the moment, such as the em-drive and other 'resonant cavity propulsion'. I think Giovanni is trying to determine whether the 'Thrust' you are talking about is like this, or whether you just mean you have experienced 'Thrust' by adding the ecat into a jet engine.
Could you please confirm whether you were discussing the ecat jet engine or whether you have experience a new type of propellantless thrust.
I hope you can answer
many thanks
Dear Andrea,
Is it safe to assume you would not be "very" pleased -beyond simply being satisfied – with the results of any test of an E-Cat product if even a miniscule amount of radiation (beyond background) had been detected outside of the reactors, a detectable level of unstable decaying transmutation products had been found during analysis of the ash, or the COP was below the long term goal of 6?
Hank Mills
Will the report be first released as:
A) A Press Release
B) A Journal of Nuclear Physics Publication
C) both A and B
D) by another method
How can the e-cat x produce thrust without expelling significant amounts of fuel? To me it seems much more intuitive that the best approach would be to create a single stage space plane (similar to NASA's approach with LENR) using an electric jet engine. If the e-cat x can produce enough electricity with a low enough mass this to me is what would seem the be the revolutionary approach. The idea of using the e-cat x to produce thrust just seems nonsensical.
Giovanni, Mark Saker, Hank Mills,
I also believe ECat QuarkX produces some thrust.
A couple of decades ago I've experimented with electric sparks and magnets, and some thrust was created in those experiments. It was very little. I found no way to scale it up. It used very much energy for a very small return.
I hope, with you, we can have a hint from A.R.
Kind Regards,
Andrea, two very funny comments from ECW about the very hot and debated "thrust" issue, I know that you need some good laugh every now and then:
Dear Andrea,
has your ECAT-q ever produced (apart from heat, electricity and light) some kind of TRUST?
Best regards
Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2016 at 5:57 AM
And this is absolutely great:
Dear Andrea,
has your ECAT-q ever produced (apart from heat, electricity and light) some kind of rust?
Best regards
Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2016 at 5:57 AM
I have my own version, even it's kind of gross:
Dear Andrea,
has your ECAT-q ever produced (apart from heat, electricity and light) some kind of crust?
Best regards
Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2016 at 5:57 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Do you heve instrumentation to measure ionizing radiations close to the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Congratulations for the Report of the ERV.
Now we wait for the product!
it is easy to reply to your supporters, but to Cory Badlam is more difficult, I know.
Any answer?
Thanks for spamming
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Some years ago I asked you if you noticed some gravitational anomaly near e-cat, and you answered no.
Now has someone asked if ecat-q ever produced (apart from heath, electricity and light) some kind of THRUST, and you answered yes.
Did something change or you didn't notice the phenomenon before?
Ingenuos Regards
Dear Andrea
I wonder if Hydrogen Embrittlement is something you need to take into account in your devices. If so I suspect you already have found your own solutions to the issue. In case it is of interest, I recently read the following article about some research performed in MIT that I though might be interesting to you.
Best Regards to you and your teams, especially during the very and fast developing progress and busy times I imagine you are experiencing in these days and the days ahead.
Dear AR
In your answer to Svein Henrik's question: 3 May a Beta edition be tested widely before commercialization?
You say: 3- possibly
I am very happy to offer myself as a Beta tester for any such unit.
Greg Leonard
Dear Andrea,
I think your exchange with Peter Metz
ERV synopsis in TENTHS of days is definitely NOT for your hypertensive friends. Perfect for your enemies.
My impression is that from now the delay is useless inutile. It replaces the question of your enemies re the independence of the ERV with the question of your friends – how independent are you?
Let's forget even the executive summary or synopsis of the report- what harm could do if the basic data global COP, power density – typical will be known?
Thank you,
Dear Andrea
Just to be accurate:
I mean THRUST as the translation of the italian word "spinta".
Is this Thrust directly obtained by the e-cat q or indirectly via other means (heat, magnetic fields, etc.)?
Many many regards
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Again congratulations for the positive report after one year test. Is that the same plant with the plate dedicated to the great Prof. Sven Kullander ? Is the plate still there ?
Dear Andrea,
Pre E-Catx and 1MW trial what is your estimate for the very approximate cost of LENR fuel equivalent to 1 barrel of oil?
I have seen old estimates but can not find them.
Best Regards
Dear Andrea:
Can you say, at least, if the COP measured in the Report is lower than 758,327 ?
Can you also say, at least, if the full-body ionizing radiation dose absorbed externally to the container is higher than 0.0001 mSv/yr?
Dear Andrea
The COP of the 1-year report is interesting. If the new ECXQ is produsing the same or more electricity than it consumes, the COP is infinity. I guess the 100W of the ECXQ is net delivered energy. The only interesting questions is then related to the surpluss of heat versus electricity. This is related to R&D and from experience it will not be presented yet. Since R&D probably never will end, a mark one must be decided.
1 Will the shelf be made in a way that so it fits for a improved version next year, and so on?
2 Is it now possible to produce the units in a uniform quality?
3 May a Beta edition be tested widely before commercialization?
4 May such units be available before the symposium in Sweden?
Dear Andrea:
Can you say, at least, if the COP measured in the Report is higher than 15?
Dear Andrea,
has your ecat-q ever produced (apart from heath, electricity and light) some kind of THRUST?
Best regards
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you measuring the radiations inside the QuarkX Cat ?
Dear Andrea,
Is this statement below accurate enough??
Hot Topics,
.. You will soon have a massive production that will make worthless the work of your competitors. The report has completely resolved the certification issues for retail sales. Very soon ANYBODY will be able to buy an E-Cat and do with it what they want. Leonardo Corporation is working on it, awaiting final test results of the Quark that should be completed within two months or less. The ABB manufacturing systems will be ready when we are done with these tests. Leonardo Corporation is working strong on all fronts. Leonardo Corporation is optimistic about this time-frame. The ECat-Q is wonderful. It works. We love it!
Frankly, the results of the one year test were too positive. was not only achieved, it was forever destroyed, abyssed even! The COP reported was so high we could not possibly consider having the numbers become public, as the sales cannot support guarantees that require "Andrea Rossi" personal attention 24 hours a day 7 days a week at hundreds, nay … thousands … of industrial sites! This would be ludicrous! The safety issues were likewise resolved – completely!
All of you who follow this blog KNOW these answers already!
Sit back.
Buckle up.
We are go for launch!
10 … 9 … 8 … 7 … 6 …
Dear Andrea:
Can you say, at least, if the COP measured in the Report is higher than 1.5 ?
I'm assuming that when you speak of an e-cat x jet engine it does not suggest that the e-cat x can produce thrust but rather it can produce electricity with a mass / energy ratio that is optimal enough to create an electric powered jet engine. Correct?
Dear Dr Rossi:
Congratulations for the positive report: you are the one in the world that brought LENR into the market.
Thank you
Dear Andrea,
I would think that the ERV report would be helpful in your sales and marketing strategy, as it would show an independent measurement of what E-Cat technology is capable of. Do you intend to use it in this way?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea
Now you are really dangerous.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
How is going the Ecat Quarkx today?
Dear Andrea,
IMHO the requirement of a years testing of your device by a publically unknown agency has provided you with two advantages. (1) You were able to refine and reengineer your unit when the inevitable discovered malfunctions occurred so that a more industrial ready unit is now available. Perhaps not all the bugs have been encountered and eliminated but many probably have been.(2)The time you were given which would have been used in overseeing the production process for delivering finished commercial units enabled you to work on developing the E-CatX which has indications for a much more useful device.
Consequential regards.
Dear Andrea,
In the past you mentioned that you hope to realize a QuarkX Jet combination in 2016.
1. Are you progressing on that?
2. Can you tell us when you think to start testing?
3. At what energy level do you intend to test it?
4. Is the QuarkX developed far enough for this application?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
On a scale of 1-10 (10 as highest)
1. Pending the release of ERV Summary to the public, how excited are you about its affect on the public?
2. How Pleased are you with the reported COP in the ERV Report, now in your hand?
Dear Dr.Rossi
Is possible to show us prematurely a live video from E-cat? To warm our Heart till we can buy your Produkt :)Anything you want without to show your professional secrets. You are now part of our Human History so please let us be part of your triumph
Best regards
Ilir M.
Dear Andrea,
It seems the ERV is perhaps used to play festina lente when it is about a huge responsibility.
However, the world's greatest specialist in the Rossi Effect knows everything about the results and has also the bills of the accountant.
In his opinion the results are good or bad? Is he contented with the COP values
and other general, basic data?
He can give the most reliable answer.
Has he – being given the anniversary of tomorrow a personal message to the spirit of Fleischmann and to Pons?
A bit of certainty could make many good people happy.
I prefer a non- public answer if it creates the slightest problem to you.
Wish you all the best and more,,
Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for the US Patent and the report of the ERV.
Will be posible to visit a plant of the E-Cat within this year ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the E-Cat Quarkx today?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
With respect to near-term certification for automobiles, your answer, of course, is necessarily correct. I found Robert Curto's question interesting, however, from the viewpoint of the medium term. Let me suggest it this way:
A car accident happens on the street in front of your house. Which would you rather have:
1) 15 gallons of gasoline spewed about the street and sidewalks (with the potential fire hazard)?
2) 1000 pounds of banged up Li-ion batteries strewn about the street (with the potential fire hazard) (and containing ~25 lbs of lithium, if my math is correct)? Or,
3) An ounce (roughly) of lithium, nickel, a little helium, etc. sprinkled on the street?
I understand that things in the real world are rarely as simple as one might wish, but, to me, the 3rd alternative *did* sound more appealing. 😉
Meanwhile, I can hardly wait to buy one of those cars!
Humorous Regards,
Walt C.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Bravo for the positive exit of the 1 year test of the E-Cat.
Are the 1 MW plants already for sale ?
Hi, Andrea:
Congratulations to you and your great Team for the successful report after the end of the test of the 1 MW plant. You made history.
You risked your life not to abandon the plant…your success has been well merited.
I have also been impressed from the persecution you have been tortured with in the nineties in Italy: I read your story on the beautiful book "an impossible invention" of Mats Lewan. Your resilience is unbelievable and I have infinite trust in you, waiting for the E-Cat for my house.
Thank you for all you are doing,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Somebody says that the E-Cat QuarkX is an excuse to delay the production of the E-Cats: is it true ?
Dr Rossi:
Congratulations for the positive report after the one year test of the 1 MW E-Cat.
Is it possible that in Sweden you will announce the producton of the E-Cat QuarkX ?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which education has the ERV that made the 350 days test of the 1 MW E-Cat ?
Dear Andrea,
If the ERV was paid by Leonardo and IH, how could he be independent ?
Cory the Sceptic
Dear Dr. Rossi,
It is clear the need for secrecy while a technology is in development and patents are being obtained. Even with the current External Review in progress, the report that comes could of course keep many details secret.
But at some point in time, there must come total transparency for all the world to examine and test the technology for themselves.
When do you think it will be possible ?
With highest respect,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding a synopsis of the ERV report when you wrote, "Yes, I will publish it within a tenth of days, anyway." what exactly did you mean? Did you mean within ten days, or within tens of days? Still on schedule?
Peter Metz
Dr. Rossi,
1) Is there an optimal operating temperature range for the Quark X?
2) If yes, will Leonardo design the heat transfer elements, or will you leave that for your customers?
Thank you for aswering.
Dear Andrea,
My guess is that you now are experimenting to combine several quarks into clusters and trying to optimize the control loops (F8).
When starting to sell products based on the quarks, have you considered that there in the price can be included a deposit for each quark? When replacing the quarks the deposit will be subtracted when handing in the depleted quarks that will be sent to Leonardo for refilling.
By implementing a deposit and replacement system Leonardo corp (or the Licencee) will keep track of the quarks. Eg a quark kan be reloaded x times before beeing recycled.
The deposit will keep curious byers from disassembling the depleted quarks.
A deposit system will also add capital to Leonardo and the Licencee for the first year.
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Regarding the possible future price of crude oil. I do realize, of course, the extent of inflation. But remember that in 1997 the price of crude averaged less than $12 a barrel when there was really not very much of an oversupply – the price took no notice at all that it 'ought' to be higher because of inflation. Do not underestimate how low the price can eventually go, ten to twenty years from now, with an oversupply condition considerably greater than in 1997. Just my take.
Precipitate regards,
Rodney Nicholson.
Dr. Rossi, you and your Readers may want to Google:
2$ in 1960 is worth how much today
Click on:
1960 Calculate the value of $2 in 1960
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I speculate that many applications that use E-cat Quarks will not need to be operating at full power 24/7/365.
Are there other methods to tell when the Quark needs to replace the charge? It would seem to be inefficient to have to replace a Quark simply because some time has passed rather than the fuel is exhausted.
Dear Andrea,
When you say in Europe "there will not be privileged areas" do you mean that Europe will be one single market with E-Cats available to all countries there, regardless of where they are manufactured?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dr Rossi,
Friend Peter Gluck reports on his blog in the name of 'business intelligence' that a gathering was held on the evening:
Wednesday February 17, (when the 353 days test has ended) in the evening, Andrea and Mme Rossi have organized a splendid celebration party for Rossi's Team plus wives at the exquisite VERO ITALIANO Restaurant in Miami. This is not espionage but it can tell much more than a spy-drone. So happy faces on the photos, and, mamma mia, what fine sorts of wines!
* Can you vouch for this?
Ok, I calculated 16$ because I take into account the dollar as a commodity, as relative to its unskilled labour value, because I'm a marxist, but Andrea Rossi is a capitalist and for him the dollar is wealth with intrinsec economic power, so the value could be also more than 65 dollars today
Rodney, you said that oil price could decline so much to become competitive with possible future cold fusion energy, perhaps reaching 2$/barrel. But 2$ in 1960-1969 equaled to 16-13$ today. And there are estraction costs to consider, today between 6-10$ for the cheapest countries. For example, during last fall in gold price, it touched 1060$/oz, where all-in extraction costs are about 1000-1050$, it could not go much under that. In oil production, it is also possible environmental costs could be calculated after all, for example in China, as the ecosystem damage is starting to exert an heavy toll on population health. Then, I would be more than happy if oil was used only for special applications like high quality plastics instead of burning it!
Obviously, all this is true at market prices, but we know that markets get rigged and distorted all the time. Look for example at helium prices, they should be twenty-fold the market price, because US government has a strange strategy of discarding and waste the extremely precious noble gas just to get the national strategic reserve exhausted and then re-start with stellar market prices. Mysteries of capitalism! Crazy idea: maybe the E-cat can directly produce helium too, besides heat, electricity, light, chocolate… please Andrea take a look hehe
Dear Dr. Rossi,
You have stated that you are 'very pleased' with the ERV report. Hopefully the results will be released soon.
Do you think that the results will be useful for the manufacturing?
Warm regards,
Dear Andrea,
probably you already have an idea for the E-Cat selling price.
What do you think can be an honest cost of a single 100W Quark-X for the final customer,
some thing between:
1) 5-10 $
2) 10-50 $
3) 50-100 $
4) 100-200 $
5) 200-1000 $
Regards, Giuseppe
April 1, 2016 at 7:15 AM
Dear Andrea,
You often say "all the energy sources will have to be integrated".
Is it possible to elaborate? "
In addition to other considerations, when demand for crude oil declines so will its price. There is a range of prices at which crude will become competitive with LENR for various petroleum product end uses. At a low enough price crude could also become competitive with LENR purely for its energy content. Andrea has previously pointed out LENR would not be competitive for water desalination. In the 1960s crude traded at $2 a barrel. When demand for crude becomes decisively less than production capacity perhaps it will trade near that price again? This is 'The Price Mechanism' at work preserving resources for more important uses. Each 'niche' will determine what works best given the resource prices prevailing at the time.
The time of being able to purchase an e-Cat is fast approaching. Would it be possible, considering that Italy will be in pole position in regard to e-Cat sales, that we Maltese be able to purchase e-Cats from Italy, which is very close to us geographically?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The release of the ERV report will it be a commun decision between you and Industrial Heat ?
Warm Regards,
Toussaint françois
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Historically, the first uses of improved power sources are often not peaceful ones. Do you have any concerns about unfriendly uses of your invention? Have you discussed opportunities for using your invention for weapons? Ate there ways of detecting LENR reactors at shipping docks, airports, etc.? Both military and corporate interests should be extremely interested.
Dear Andrea.
Thanks for answers.
If Cristal balls are requested, You may pick the very one you need: https://www.google.no/search?q=crystal+ball&biw=973&bih=932&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_p4f24u3LAhVBCiwKHR0ZAhEQsAQIHQ
I rater trust to your best judgement, even if you are uncertain.
Best regards: Svein Henrik.
Dear, Andrea,
I must dissagree, you are surely not curmudgeon.
BTW, I had to look it.
God Bless and continue to prosper you.
Dear Andrea.
We are earlier informed of a new ECXQ test in Europe and end of R&D period within 2 month.
1. Will the test start within April, or May?
2. Will details of ECXQ be presented in May, June or later?
3. Are answers the above questions depended of IH's decisions?
4. Will ECXQs be made available to cooperating OEMs in Europe?
5. Is the 1 year function period of the ECXQ dependent of the intermittens of use?
6. May it be an idea to give samples of single units to be tested by universities?
Thank You for earlier answers and attention.
Regards: Svein Henrik
Dear Andrea,
You often say "all the energy sources will have to be integrated".
Is it possible to elaborate?
I confess to being a little confused as my expectation is that, given a little time
your, LENR alone will, power automobiles, ships etc, (maybe aircraft) and provide all our needs for electric and heating without help from fosils.
Am I too optimistic?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
When do you think the E-Cat QuarkX will be in operation in an industrial concern, as it happened with the 1 MW E-Cat ?
Dear Andrea:
Is it possible for you to publish an updated list of all your licensees ?
Congratulations for your US Patent and the results of the 352 days test of the 1 MW E-Cat: you made History.
Dear Andrea and fellow readers,
I think that something is cooking up here behind a courtains. Maybe the World finally starts to see that end of "Fossil Fuels Era" is coming inevitably. Who knows, maybe news about successful outcome of 1MW reactor is a tipping point here.
Just check the headlines:
Early this year, ARAMCO the most valuable company in the World suddenly announced it is going for IPO:
Next we heard that Rockefeller foundation is going to divest from fossil fuels including oil:
Last week enormous Unaoil bribery scandal surfaced. Isn't that due to losing some protection umbrella? Why Unaoil was allowed to operate unnoticied for 15 years?
Is this mysterious reason behind all that things just fear of climate change and a sudden urge to become green? I don't think so. It is just a PR stunt.
Seems that oil companies are finally aware that we are reaching end of "Fossil Fuels Era". The LENR breakthrough is coming and they know about this:
What we see is just a cleaning operation. It is business closure time and they are desperately trying to squeeze as much money as they can before everything collapses.
Andrea, hope you are going to peacefuly sail through turbulent moments which are ahead of you. Good Luck!
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you still in contact with Dr Parkhomov ?
Warm Regards,
Here is a beautiful article to read:
Each one of us will say, in the future: "I was there, witness of those days…"
Kind Regards
Italo R.
Andrea, the phrase on the guinea pig was a great fun to read but moving and emotional, it perfectly and shortly describes the very essence about yourself as a man I think! Thank you also for this little gem!
(I was being completely fooled after the first words, I must say with a slight subtle shiver of scandalized, leftist petty bourgeois discomfort for the poor little sacrificed pet, by you and your brutal distopic team of heartless robots!)
Dear Andrea,
Here is a video of an ABB robot working as a gift wrapper in Sweden last Christmas.
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Dear mr Rossi,
Regarding e-cat and mouse configuration:
can you now explain what the mouse actually consist of?
Hello, Mr. Rossi. When you create an e-Cat reactor quark X you have moved to higher temperatures and smaller size of the reactor. Apparently it requires the use of more expensive refractory materials and high precision heat transducer assembly into electricity. Perhaps it makes sense to transfer to reload cartridges only fuel converters leaving the customer? You are using carbon nanotubes to improve the characteristics of the emitter?
With respect Fedor.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations to you and your Team for the positive ERV report. I know you a driven man with a lot still to accomplish but I hope at some point you take some time for a victory lap. It will motivate you and allow the world to congratulate you.
Peter Metz
I dream of a world without oil!
Yury Isayev,
Tyumen, Russia.
My wife cried when I read your post about the "guinea pig". I think you are a great man for it that will save humanity.
Yury Isayev,
Tyumen, Russia.
Dott. Rossi,
guinea pig in conctac with IR only for 353 days? And the others 12 days?
Play tennis or relax in the barn? EhEhEhEh…..:-)
Dear Andrea:
I apologize if this has already been covered but do you expect the domestic E-CatQuarkX to respond to varying loads automatically? Or will the system require battery or power grid attachment to handle peak household loads?
Thank You
John C Evans
Dr. Rossi: Is it possible you will be able to send us our E-Cats in a match box? (:
Dr Andrea Rossi
Congratulations for the 353 days historic test
Eng. Rossi,
We are all waiting with bated breath for your technology to be released, and for the world to know that the energy revolution is here.
You describe the QuarkX as "like a pencil". Does that mean it is about 1/4 inch diameter and about 8 inches long? Does it require cumbersome control equipment, or shielding? Or could it be made small enough to fit into a cell phone? How easy would it be to adapt it to fit into a laptop computer and power it? Having LENR take over powering small devices like this is as revolutionary as being able to provide grid power.
Dear Andrea,
I understand that the Warship is heading away from the expected tsunami of mud.
On the other hand, the Submarines of the competition may also have trouble with mud. Even more deadly: they can be taken down unnoticed.
Jets are the better option. For many reasons. Are you still working on that ? Or has the industrialization highest priority now ?
About safety: during the 352 days of test have been measured the ionizing radiations outside the E-Cats ?
Kind Regards,
Dear Andrea,
Has your company looked into obtaining some sort of insurance? Some of your customers may require it before installation or purchase. With the ERV and all the previous test results of the devices, you should be able to obtain a relatively inexpensive policy.
Assurance regards.
Dr. Rossi: Is there anything in the report that will complicate certification of E-Cat for domestic use? If no, will the report speed up certification of domestic E-Cat?
Dear Andrea,
There will always be an F(X).
Otherwise there is no purpose in life.
But it is good to solve one, and progress to the next.
Solved regards,
Dear Andrea,
Evolutions of words follow the Evolutions of Technology. …ergo….It is natural that LENR/ECAT/ROSSI & THE DREAM TEAM discover a new
Term…..revolution is Now.
Grazie di tutto….in particolare per l'attenzione che ci dedica rispondendo alle nostre domande.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for the positive ERV report. Very well deserved by you and your team. This is so exciting it gives me goosebumps. Thank you for all your hard work and perseverance.
Bernie Morrissey
How much power will the small E-CatQuarkX produce?
How much power will it consume?
How much fuel will it consume per year?
Dear Andrea,
first of all, congratulation to You and all your Team for the positive results of the ERV report (F9 = OK)!
I would like to invest my energies in the E-Cat QuarX (can we call it briefly in this way ?) organizing and managing the distribution and support network in Italy.
Is there any means to apply for that ?
Thanks a lot and never give up (lavolale, lavolale, …) !!!
Dear Andrea,
Could you have proceeded for the industrialization without receiving the Report?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
In what sizes will the E-CatQuarkX be sold to industries?
Have you decided the size for one for domestic use?
It is time to reveal the E-Cat is not a Pink Elephant, to be ignored; nor is it a Rough Elephant that will wreak havoc; but one of the World Elephants that will support humanity.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Perhaps your Readers can be interested to the following links.
The first one is the 2nd part of the documentary upon Nikolai Tesla made by Vessela Nikolova and Salvo Mandarà; the second one is the interview of Vessela Nikolova to Prof Teodorani also related to the LENR.
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yeEf_mSwh8
2) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T168zwvHegk
Carissimo Andrea
How was the meeting with ABB?
Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi. Very concerned about his health. Light and electric power is more dangerous load. Take care of yourself. You must be a triumph! I look forward to a report asap and a conference in June. Full of hope. Long ago I left a request to purchase the E-Cat. I look forward to announcing your preferences on the possible participation in the financing for your old aficionados and popularizers.
Yury Isayev,
Tyumen, Russia.
Dear Dr. Rossi, "…the job has been started….", finally, after a lot of hard work physical and mental.
If I may ask, which type of E-Cat will be produced in the robitized plant?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
What do you start to massproduce?
Will it be used only for industries?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Sorry to have caused such consternation with my last question regarding the possible colours of light a quarkx might emit.
Let me ask a different question, please. You currently have certifications for industrial uses of your inventions. You also had the intriguing image of a network of e-cat light standards, which supplied light, heat and electricity to user's homes. Do you conceive of that as an industrial system? If the system were run as a utility company, perhaps?
Again, congratulations on the new report!
Dear Andrea,
How went the meeting with ABB?
Best Regards,
Dear Andrea:
First, my very hearty congratulations. This is wonderful news.
Second, regarding Gerard McEk's concern about the disruption of energy markets, when he said:
Gerard McEk
March 29, 2016 at 12:29 PM
" ….. the E-cat will be extremely competing when compared to other energy sources. This will disturb the energy market, especially when you start mass producing them. I am sure that you must have considered this disturbance, but you obviously do not think it may be disruptive for the whole market, or do you? Have you never been asked to do this gradually?"
I believe the total amount of energy currently being generated world-wide from all sources, including oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear and all the others is so huge that, even at the fastest imaginable rate of production of E-cat devices, the transition must inevitably be gradual because a positively huge number of E-cat units will be required to make an appreciable dent on total energy usage from current sources. Companies in the fossil fuels industry will have many years to adjust to the new reality. In my opinion it may be ten years before your technology achieves substantial market penetration, simply because of the sheer enormity of the energy market.
Very hearty regards,
Rodney Nicholson.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the good news, and good luck for tomorrow's ABB meeting. You will need it, to convince the "Professor": you know, the one who, according to the other robots, thinks cogito ergo sum.
Regards, 29K
Dear Rossi,
1. What is the most likely form factor of the E-Cat Quark X? Will it still be cylindrical like the E-Cat HT or it can also be a rectangular prism?
2. Is there a possibility to ignite the reaction within the reactor via methods other than heater coils, like using laser or IR pulses?
We had an Industrial Revolution in the late 1700s to early 1800s, and it's very probable that today's generation shall be known as the generation of the Energy Revolution because of you and the E-Cat.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on the apparently promising result! I have one remark regarding a potential IPO, since obviously many readers would like to invest in your company. (@All: This no invitation to do so. Note that every investment is risky.) If possible, do not choose the OTC market but a public exchange like NASDAQ, for example. Especially in Europe there are restrictions regarding OTC stocks which might prevent many of your readers from participating a little in the (Fx) commercial success of the E-Cat.
Best regards,
Andreas Moraitis
Dear Marco,
We were spoken about "classical" closed Thorium fuel cycle in conventional reactors (and not hybrid reactors as Rubbiatron). Thorium fuel is considered as a fuel for a lot of new conceptions of reactors (for example there is a conception of Molten Salt Fast Reactor, which uses molten salt as a fuel and a coolant in the same time). 100 years is taken from the fact that for now there are only conceptions of such reactors. Usually for nuclear reactors it takes a lot of time from conception to the real project and construction. Moreover, not only the reactor, but all the chain of the cycle (mining, isotopes separation, recycling of fuel) should be elaborated. So new installations for these processes should be constructed. That will require a lot of time, taking into account that for now a lot of military Plutonium should be "burnt" in nuclear reactors.
As for hybrid reactors, indeed, for example Bogomolov proposed to use backward wave linear accelerators of protons (BWLAP), but the work hasn't been completed, so for now it is too early to speak about specific dates of construction. In such reactors not only Th-232, but also spent nuclear fuel and U-238 can be used (nowadays a lot of U-238 is stocked at enrichment facilities) .But so far there is no experimental verification of this sector and identification of all its advantages and disadvantages; so it is difficult to speak about its development. Even if to take into account utilization of long-lived actinides in such reactors, the quantity of minor actinides (isotopes of Am, Km, Np) will be huge, and the problem of radioactive waste remains
Best regards,
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations! for the positive ERV report an another great acheivement!
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Hello Andrea,
why are you preparing mass production, if you have no certification for domestic Ecats? Do you think, that the demand for industrial Ecats will be high enough for mass production?
Can you clarify, which Ecat (Ecat LT, Ecat HT, QuarkX, industrial or domestic) will go into mass production?
Besides: Congrats to the ERVs report / your results with the 1-year test!
Could the report in any way help on the rocky way for certifying the domestic Ecat?
God bless you, your team and all holy cats
Best regards,
Dear Andrea,
First congratulations with the received ERV report and that you are pleased with it. It makes an end to a very intensive period in your life and it must take a load of stress from your scolders.
Now we, E-cat followers, are in positive stress to see some of the conclusions also!
As you may have heard the Saudies are getting more influence in other energy products (maybe even yours via shares), the Rockenfellers are withdrawing themselves from the oil, Shell is going into the windmills. You will say that it is not because of your accomplishments, but the timing coincidence is evident. I would not be surprised that time will learn that you are wielding the crowbar to tip the energy market into the Era of the New Fire. Many things will change, be careful please.
Dear Andrea
I would like to join to other readers in congratulating you for the positive result of the ERV report. Let me tell you that I was quite sure of this outcome and I used F9 only for not to attract bad luck (ma come si dice scaramanzia in inglese?). But now this is not only my humble opinion. The new fire really WORKS !!! The mankind can now get out of the caves and stop to eat raw meat. Our dirty chains with oil and coal are finally broken. Planet Earth can restart to breathe. People is not realizing how much this step is important. I'm sure they will.
Andrea thank you for all your hard work. I'm very proud to be your fan and believe me it is not just rhetoric.
No questions to ask this time, it's too much an important event to celebrate it.
God bless you
Marco Serra
Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the report! Very good!
I am very eager to read it when you publish it. Hopefully soon!
Best wishes and regards,
Mats Heijkenskjold
Dan C. posts,
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I know that due to NDA you can not tell us what the maximum COP achieved or even the average. But could you tell us what the minimum COP is?
Andrea Responds, Yes, I think I can do that without violating NDA.
When the E-cat is not in operation, the minimum COP is absolutely ZERO.
he he he
To you & your team on a positive ERV report.
Dan C.
Dear Dr Rossi,
I am sure that you will breath a momentary sigh of relief with the results in your hand. I am curious to what will you be producing in the factory that you are building. Will you be building a specific building block and then letting other companies use those blocks to make their own products or will you be producing specific products yourself.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for this historic achievement.
Mr. Rossi,
Sergio is smiling!
Keep your container office for the museum.
Congratulations, I had no doubt.
God Speed