text:
Law Case File: Tort Law
Are you looking for tort law cases to help you with your tort law dissertations, coursework and essay assignments? Below you will find a list of law case titles for you to research on the web to help you with your Tort Law studies.
A (a child) v Ministry of Defence
A v Essex County Council
A v Essex County Council
A v Hoare; H v Suffolk County Council; X v Wandsworth London Borough Council
A v Ministry of Defence
A v National Blood Authority
AB v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust sub nom Organ Retention Group Litigation, Re
Abbas v Kenney
Abou-Rahmah v Abacha
Acrecrest Ltd v W S Hattrell & Partners
Adams v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Adams v Rhymney Valley District Council
Addie (Robert) & Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Dumbreck
Adelaide Chemical and Fertilizer Co Ltd v Carlyle
Adlington v Comr of Police for the Metropolis
A-G v Carter
Aiken v Stewart Wrightson Members' Agency Ltd
Aisbitt v Conrathe
Akasuc Enterprise Ltd v Farmar & Shirreff (a firm)
Al Hamwi v Johnston
Al Saudi Banque v Clark Pixley (a firm)
Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
Alexander Forbes Europe Ltd v SBJ Ltd
Alexandrou v Oxford
Ali (Saif) v Sydney Mitchell & Co (a firm)
Alison v Foister
Al-Kandari v JR Brown & Co
Allen v British Rail Engineering Ltd
Allen v Ellis & Co
Allison v Corby District Council
Allport v Wilbraham
Al-Nakib Investments (Jersey) Ltd v Longcroft
American Express International Banking Corpn v Hurley
AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling Ltd
Amonoo-Quyst v McHale
Ancell v McDermott
Anderson (W B) & Sons Ltd v Rhodes (Liverpool) Ltd
Anderson v Coutts
Anderson v Forth Valley Health Board
Anderson v Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Trust
Andrews v Barnett Waddingham (a firm)
Andrews v Hopkinson
Anglo-Celtic Shipping Co Ltd v Elliott and Jeffery
Angus v London, Tilbury and Southend Rly Co
Anns v Merton London Borough Council
Anthony v Midland Rly Co
Anthony v Wright
Architype Projects Ltd v Dewhurst MacFarlane & Partners (a firm)
Argy Trading Development Co Ltd v Lapid Developments Ltd
Armstrong v British Coal Corpn
Arthur J S Hall & Co (a firm) v Simons, Barratt v Woolf Seddon; Cockbone v Atkinson Dacre & Slack; Harris v Scholfield Roberts & Hill
Arthur J S Hall & Co (a firm) v Simons; Barratt v Ansell (trading as Woolf Seddon (a firm)); Harris v Scholfield Roberts & Hill (a firm)
Ashdown v Samuel Williams & Sons Ltd
Ashton v Turner
Asiansky Television plc v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin
Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin (a firm)
Aspin v Metric Group Ltd
Aswan Engineering Establishment Co v Lupdine Ltd (Thurgar Bolle, third party)
Atherton v London and North Western Rly Co
Attia v British Gas plc
Attwell v McPartlin
Atwell v Michael Perry & Co (a firm)
Austin v Great Western Rly Co
Austin v Great Western Rly Co
Autorama (Pvt) Ltd v Farm Equipment Auctions (Pvt) Ltd
Avis v Great Eastern Rly Co
Awad v Pollai and Nathanielsz
Ayles v South Eastern Rly Co
Ayles v South Eastern Rly Co
Aylwen v Taylor Joynson Garrett (a firm)
B v A-G of New Zealand
B v Islington Health Authority
Babcock International Ltd v National Grid Co plc
Bailey v Command Security Services Ltd
Bailey v Neal
Baker v E Longhurst & Sons Ltd
Balamoan v Holden & Co
Balcomb v Wards Construction (Medway) Ltd
Bale v HSBC Bank plc
Balfour v Barty-King (Hyder & Sons (Builders) Ltd, third parties)
Ball v LCC
Ball v Wirral Health Authority
Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) v Price Waterhouse (No 3)
Banks v Ablex Ltd
Banks v Reid
Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd
Banque Financi�re de la Cit� SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullmann SA) v Westgate Insurance Co Ltd (formerly Hodge General and Mercantile Co Ltd)
Barber v Somerset County Council
Barcock v Brighton Corpn
Barings plc (in liquidation) v Coopers & Lybrand (a firm), Barings Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Mattar
Bark v Messrs Hawley & Rodgers
Barnard v Sully
Barnes UDC v London General Omnibus Co
Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee
Barnett v H and J Packer & Co Ltd
Barnett v Scottish Power t/a Manweb Metering Business
Baron v B French Ltd
Barr v Coventry & Solihull Waste Disposal Co Ltd
Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
Barrett v Midland Rly Co
Barrett v Ministry of Defence
Barrie v Cardiff County Council
Base Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin
Batchelor v Fortescue
Bates v Parker
Bates v Stone Parish Council
Batty v Metropolitan Property Realisations Ltd
Baxall Securities Ltd v Sheard Walshaw Partnership (a firm)
Baxall Securities Ltd v Sheard Walshaw Partnership (a firm)
Bayne v Walker
Beamon v Ellice
Beary v Pall Mall Investments (a firm)
Beaton v Devon County Council
Beaton v Nationwide Building Society
Beaumont v Humberts
Beaumont v Humberts
Beaumont v Surrey County Council
Bebee v Sales
Beckett v Newalls Insulation Co Ltd
Becquet v MacCarthy
Bellarby v Worthing and Southlands Hospitals NHS Trust
Bellefield Computer Services Ltd v E Turner & Sons Ltd
Bellefield Computer Services Ltd v E Turner & Sons Ltd
Bellefield Computer Services v E Turner & Sons Ltd
Bennett v Metropolitan Police Comr
Benson v Furness Rly Co
Berringer v Great Eastern Rly Co
Beswarick v Ripman
Bews v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
Bici v Ministry of Defence
Biddle v Hart
Billington v Maguire
Bint v Lewisham Borough Council
Bird v Great Northern Rly Co
Birmingham Corpn v S Allsopp & Sons Ltd
Birse Construction Ltd v Haiste Ltd
BL Holdings Ltd v Robert J Wood & Partners
Blacker v Lake and Elliot Ltd
Blackman v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Blackman v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Blackman v Railway Executive
Blackmore v South Essex Health Authority
Blake v Galloway
Blake v Harding & Rowe (a firm)
Blamires v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Bland v Morris
Bloomstein v Railway Executive
Bluett v Suffolk County Council
Bluett v Suffolk County Council
Blyth v Bloomsbury Health Authority
Bolch v Smith sub nom Bolett v Smith
Bolch v Smith sub nom Bolett v Smith
Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority
Booker v Wenborn
Bottomley v Bannister
Bottomley v Todmorden Cricket Club
Bourne v McEvoy Timber Preservation Ltd
Bow Valley Husky (Bermuda) Ltd v St John Shipbuilding Ltd
Bowe v Townend
Bowie v Southorns (a firm)
Boyd Knight v Purdue
BP plc v AON Ltd
BP plc v AON Ltd
Brackley v Midland Rly Co
Bradford-Smart v West Sussex County Council
Braithwaite v South Durham Steel Co Ltd
Brannigen v Harrington
Brearley v London and North Western Rly Co
Breen v Newbury
Breeze v Ahmed
Bremner v Williams
Brice v Brown
Bridges v North London Rly Co
Brindle v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
Brindley v Queen's Medical Centre University Hospital NHS Trust
Brinn v Russell Jones & Walker (a firm)
Brioland Ltd v Searson sub nom Searson v Brioland Ltd
British Railways Board v Herrington
British Telecommunications plc v James Thomson & Sons (Engineers) Ltd
Brodie v Singleton Shire Council, Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council
Bromley v Mercer
Brookes v London Passenger Transport Board
Brookes v South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive
Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
Brooks v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
Brophy v Dunphys Chartered Surveyors
Brown v Birmingham and Black Country Strategic Health Authority
Brown v Corus (UK) Ltd
Brown v Great Western Rly Co
Brown v Great Western Rly Co
Brown v KMR Services Ltd
Brown v Nelson
Brown v Sargent
Browning v Brachers (a firm)
Bryan v Maloney
Bryce v Swan Hunter Group plc
Bulled v McClure
Bullner v London, Chatham and Dover Rly Co
Bunker v Charles Brand & Son Ltd
Burchell v Hickisson
Burfitt v A and E Kille
Burke v Blackpool and Fylde College
Burke v Gillard
Burke v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Burkin v Bilezikdji
Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd
Burns v Shuttlehurst Ltd
Burridge v Airwork Ltd
Burrow v Metropolitan Police Comr
Burton v Islington Health Authority
Butchart v Home Office
Butcher v Cornwall County Council
Button v Norfolk County Council
Bux v Slough Metals Ltd
Byrne v Boadle
Byrne v Boadle
C v Cairns
C v D
C v Middlesbrough Council
Caldwell v Maguire
Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dredge Willemstad
Calveley v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police
Canara Bank v Canara Sales Corp
Canterbury (Viscount) v A-G
Caparo Industries plc v Dickman
Capital and Counties plc v Hampshire County Council and other appeals
Capital and Counties plc v Hampshire County Council, Digital Equipment Co Ltd v Hampshire County Council
Carberry v Davies
Carford Catering Ltd v Fowler
Carmarthenshire County Council v Lewis
Carpenter v Lunnon
Carpue v London and Brighton Rly Co
Carr-Glynn v Frearsons (a firm)
Carryfast Ltd v Hack
Carty (by his Litigation Friend) v Croydon London Borough Council
Carty v Croydon London Borough Council
Caseley v Bristol Corpn
Castle v Parker
Castle v Parker
Catherall v Mersey Rly Co
Cattanach v Melchior
Cavanagh v Ulster Weaving Co Ltd
CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics plc
Central Trust Co v Rafuse
Chadli v Brooks
Chadli v Brooks
Chadwick v British Transport Commission (or British Railways Board)
Chandrasekaran v Deloitte & Touche Wealth Management Ltd
Chapman v Amos
Chapman v Lord Advocate
Chapman v Rothwell
Charles v Cardiff County Council
Chaudhry v Prabhakar
Chelva-Nayagam v Patel
Chester v Afshar
Chester v Afshar
Chin Keow v Government of Malaysia
China and South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan Soon Gin (alias George Tan)
Chinery v Engineering with Excellence Ltd
Chittock v Woodbridge School
Chittock v Woodbridge School
Chop Seng Heng v Thevannasan s/o Sinnopan
Christensen v Scott
Christie v Griggs
City Centre Restaurants (UK) Ltd v Howard Kennedy (a firm)
Clare v Buckle Mellows (a firm)
Clare v L Whittaker & Son (London) Ltd
Clare v Perry (t/a Widemouth Manor Hotel)
Clark v Chief Constable of Essex Police
Clarke v Bruce Lance & Co (a firm)
Clarke v Crew
Clarke v Iliffes Booth Bennett (a firm)
Clarke v Taff Ely Borough Council
Clarke v Winchurch
Clay v A J Crump & Sons Ltd
Clifford v Drymond
Clinton v J Lyons & Co Ltd
Clough v Bussan (West Yorkshire Police Authority, third party)
Clough v First Choice Holidays and Flights Ltd
Clunis v Camden and Islington Health Authority
Coates v Jaguar Cars Ltd
Coates v Rawtenstall Borough Council
Cockle v London and South Eastern Rly Co
Cockle v London and South Eastern Rly Co
Cohen v Metropolitan Rly Co
Cole v South Tweed Heads Rugby League Football Club Ltd
Coleman v South Eastern Rly Co
Coleman v South Eastern Rly Co
Collier v Peterborough City Council
Collins v London General Transport Services Ltd
Columbus Co v Clowes
Condon v Basi
Conway v Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust
Cook v Bradford Community Health NHS Trust
Cooke v Midland Great Western Rly of Ireland
Cooper (Lee) Ltd v C H Jeakins & Sons Ltd
Cooper v Hobart
Cooper v Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust
Corbett v Bond Pearce (a firm)
Corby v Hill
Cornish v Midland Bank plc (Humes, third party)
Cornman v Eastern Counties Rly Co
Corr (Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas Corr, Deceased) v IBC Vehicles Ltd
Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police sub nom Chief Constable of Northumbria v Costello
Cotterill v Starkey
Cotton v Wallis
Couch v McCann
Coulthard v Neville Russell (a firm)
Cowan v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Cox v Coulson
Cox v H C B Angus Ltd
Crafter v Metropolitan Rly Co
Crafter v Metropolitan Rly Co
Crane v South Suburban Gas Co
Craneheath Securities Ltd v York Montague Ltd
Craven v Riches
Creed v John McGeoch & Sons Ltd
Croft v Broadstairs & St Peter's Town Council
Crofts v Waterhouse
Crogate v Morris
Cross v Amery-Parkes
Cross v David Martin and Mortimer
Crouch v British Rail Engineering Ltd
Crump v Torfaen Borough Council
Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd
Culford Metal Industries Ltd v Export Credit Guarantees Department
Culkin v McFie & Sons Ltd
Curran v Docherty
Currie v Clamp
Curtis v Drinkwater
Customs and Excise Comrs v Barclays Bank plc
Customs and Excise Comrs v Barclays Bank plc
Cuttress v Scaffolding (Great Britain) Ltd
Cynat Products Ltd v Landbuild (Investment and Property) Ltd
D & F Estates Ltd v Church Comrs for England
D v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council; H v same
D v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust, K v Dewsbury Healthcare NHS Trust, K v Oldham NHS Trust
D v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust; K v Dewsbury Healthcare NHS Trust; K v Oldham NHS Trust
D v L Hospitals NHS Trust
DA v North East London Strategic Health Authority
Daborn v Bath Tramways Motor Co Ltd and Smithey
Dainty v Reynolds
Dallas v Great Western Rly Co
Dalyell v Tyrer
Daniel v Metropolitan Rly Co
Daniels and Daniels v R White & Sons Ltd and Tarbard
Daniels v Thompson
Danns v Department of Health
Darngavil Coal Co Ltd v M'Kinlay
Davenhall v Blackstone Franks & Co (a firm)
Davey v Chamberlain
David v Honeywell Normalair-Garrett Ltd
Davidson v Lothian and Borders Fire Board
Davie v New Merton Board Mills Ltd
Davies v Oxley Plumbers Merchants (SBG Felt Roofing, Pt 20 defendant)
Davis v Radcliffe
Davis v Radcliffe
Davis v St Mary's Demolition and Excavation Co Ltd
Davison v Leggett
Dawrant v Nutt
Dawson Cornwell & Co (a firm) v C J Nicholl & Associates Ltd
Dawson v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Dawson v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Day v Cook
Day v High Performance Sports Ltd (trading as Castle Climbing Centre)
De Boos v Collard
de Martell v Merton and Sutton Health Authority
Dean v Allin and Watts
Dean v Allin and Watts (a firm)
Dean v Branthwaite
Dean v Chief Constable of the Leicestershire Constabulary
Debs v Sibec Developments Ltd
Debtor, a (No 478 SD 2000), Re
Delaney v Metropolitan Rly Co
Delaware Mansions Ltd and Flecksun Ltd v City of Westminster
Demarco v Perkins
Den Norske Bank ASA v Acemex Management Co Ltd
Denton v United Omnibus Ltd
Department of National Heritage v Steensen Varming Mulcahy (a firm) (Balfour Beatty Ltd and another, third parties)
Deriche v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
Devon County Council v Clarke sub nom Clark v Devon County Council
Dianbuca v Arriva London North Ltd
Dickson v J A Scott Ltd
Digital Equipment Corpn v Darkcrest Ltd
Dike v Rickman
Disley v Levine
Dixon v Bell
Dixon v Clement Jones Solicitors (a firm)
DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
Dobson v Dobson
Doherty v Rugby Joinery (UK) Ltd
Donaldson v McNiven
Donaldson v Wilson
Donnelley v Chief Constable of Lincolnshire
Donoghue v Folkestone Properties Ltd
Donovan v Union Cartage Co Ltd
Douce v Staffordshire County Council
Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corpn Ltd
Doyle v Wragg
Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd
Driver v William Willett (Contractors) Ltd
Drury v North Eastern Rly Co
Dublin Wicklow and Wexford Rly Co v Slattery
Duddin v The Home Office
Dudley v Smith
Dudman v North London Rly Co
Dunk v North Staffordshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Dunkly v Wade
Dunn v South Tyneside Health Care NHS Trust
Dunster v Abbott
Durnford v Western Atlas International Inc
Duthie v Bath & North East Somerset Council
Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC sub nom Dutton v Bognor Regis United Building Co Ltd
Duval v Seguin
Dyer v Ilfracombe UDC
E v Castro
E v S Garages Ltd
Earl v Lubbock
Easson v London and North Eastern Rly Co
East Indian Rly Co v Kalidas Mukerjee
Eastman v South West Thames Regional Health Authority
Eastman v South West Thames Regional Health Authority
Eaton v James Latham plc
Eden v West & Co
Edmunds v Andrews & Ashwell
Edwards v Law Society of Upper Canada, A-G for Ontario intervening
Edwards v Lee
Edwards v Railway Executive
Electra Private Equity Partners v KPMG Peat Marwick
Electrochrome Ltd v Welsh Plastics Ltd
Eley v King & Chasemore
Elguzouli-Daf v Metropolitan Police Comr; McBrearty v Ministry of Defence
Elizabeth v Motor Insurers' Bureau
Elliott v C P Roberts & Co Ltd
Elliott v Hall
Ellis v Fulham Borough Council
Ellis v Home Office
Ellis v Royal Surrey County Hospital
Ellor v Selfridge & Co Ltd
Emanuel (H & N) Ltd v Greater London Council
Empress Assurance Corpn Ltd v C T Bowring & Co Ltd
Enright v Kwun
Equitable Life Assurance Society v Bowley
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon
European International Reinsurance Co Ltd v Sedgwick Ltd sub nom European International Reinsurance Co Ltd v Curzon Insurance Ltd
Eva (Joseph) Ltd v Reeves
Evans Halshaw Motors Ltd (trading as Evans of Leicester) v J&R Mac (Machine Tools) Ltd
Evans v Edinburgh Corpn
Evans v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Evans v Triplex Safety Glass Co Ltd
Evans v Waitemata District Pony Club, East Coast Bays Branch
Excelsior Commercial & Industrial Holdings Ltd v Salisbury Hamer Aspden & Johnson
Excelsior Wire Rope Co Ltd v Callan
F v Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council
Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and other appeals
Fairlie v Perth and Kinross Healthcare NHS Trust
Fairline Shipping Corpn v Adamson
Fairman v Perpetual Investment Building Society
Farley v Skinner
Farr v Butters Bros & Co
Farraj v King's Healthcare NHS Trust
Farrant v Thanet Disctrict Council
Farrugia v Great Western Rly Co
Faryab v Phillip Ross & Co (a firm)
Faulkner v Enfield London Borough Council
Fawdry v Ministry of Defence
Fellowes v Rother District Council
Ferguson v Welsh
Field v E E Jeavons & Co Ltd
Filliter v Phippard
Finegan v London and North Western Rly Co
First City Corp v Downsview Nominees Ltd
First National Commercial Bank plc v Loxleys (a firm)
Firth v Carib Holdings Ltd
Fisher v CHT Ltd (No 2)
Fisher v McKenzie
Flaviis v Pauley (trading as Banjax Bike Hire)
Fleming v Securities Commission
Fleming's Case (circa 1795)
Fletcher v Manitoba Public Insurance Co
Folkes v North London Rly Co
Fong Maun Yee v Yoong Weng Ho Robert
Fontaine v Insurance Corp of British Columbia
Football League Ltd v Edge Ellison (a firm)
Ford v Gloucester Co-operative Industrial Society Ltd
Ford v London and South Western Rly Co
Ford v London and South Western Rly Co
Fordham v London Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Fotedar v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
Fox v Ministry of Defence
Foy v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Foy v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Francis v Barclays Bank plc; Barclays Bank plc v Kirkby & Diamond
Franklin v Gramophone Co Ltd
Fraser v Gaskell
Fraser v The Professional Golfers' Association Ltd
Fraser-Wallas v Elsie and Doris Waters (a firm)
French v Chief Constable of Sussex
French v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
French v Thames Valley Strategic Health Authority
Froggatt v Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Royal Hospital NHS Trust
Frost & Sutcliffe (a firm) v Tuiara
Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
Frost v James Finlay Bank Ltd
Frost v James Finlay Bank Ltd
Fuji Seal Europe Ltd v Catalytic Combustion Corpn
G Bosman (Transport) Ltd v LKW Walter International Transportorganisation AG
Gabriel v Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Gaisford v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Galbraith's Curator ad Litem v Stewart (No 2)
Gallagher v Haven Leisure Ltd
Gallagher v Humphrey
Gallagher v Humphrey
Gallagher v Kleinwort Benson (Trustees) Ltd
Galoo Ltd (in liquidation) v Bright Grahame Murray (a firm)
Garcia v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
Garcia v St Mary's National Health Service Trust
Garner v Walsall Hospitals NHS Trust
Garrod v North Devon NHS Primary Care Trust
Gayler and Pope Ltd v B Davies & Son Ltd
Gee v Metropolitan Rly Co
General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn v Tanter, The Zephyr
Gibson v British Rail Maintenance Ltd
Gilbert v North London Rly Co
Gilfillan v Barbour
Gill v Great Eastern Rly Co
Gillon v Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police
Glasgow Corpn v Muir
Glasgow Corpn v Taylor
Glyn (t/a Priors Farm Equine Veterinary Surgery) v McGarel-Groves
Glyn (t/a Priors Farm Equine Veterinary Surgery) v McGarel-Groves
Goddard v Greenwood
Godden v Kent and Medway Strategic Health Authority
Gold v Haringey Health Authority
Goldman v Hargrave
Goldstein v Levy Gee (a firm)
Gomberg v Smith
Gooden v Northamptonshire County Council
Gooden v Northamptonshire County Council
Goodwill v British Pregnancy Advisory Service
Gorely v Codd
Gorham v British Telecommunications plc
Gosfield School Ltd v Birkett Long (a firm)
Gough v National Coal Board
Gough v Thorne
Gow v Harker
Gowar v Hales
Grace v Tanner
Graham v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd
Gran Gelato Ltd v Richcliff (Group) Ltd
Grand Trunk Rly Co of Canada v Barnett
Grand Trunk Rly Co of Canada v Jennings
Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
Grange Motors (Cymbran) (or Cwmbran) Ltd v Spencer (or Spenser)
Great Central Rly Co v Bates
Great North Eastern Railway Ltd v Hart
Great Northern Rly Co v Harrison
Greatorex v Greatorex (Pope, Pt 20 defendant)
Greaves & Co (Contractors) Ltd v Baynham, Meikle & Partners
Greaves & Co (Contractors) Ltd v Baynham, Meikle & Partners
Green v Fibreglass Ltd
Greene v Chelsea Borough Council
Greenhalgh v British Railways Board
Gregg v Scott
Gregory v Shepherds (a firm)
Griffin v Ironmonger
Griffiths v Arch Engineering Co (Newport) Ltd
Griffiths v London and North Western Rly Co
Griffiths v London and North Western Rly Co
Griggs v Transco plc
Grimm v Newman
Grimm v Newman
Grindlays Bank International (Z) Ltd v Nahar Investments Ltd
Grinstead v Lywood
Groom v Selby
Group B Plaintiffs v Medical Research Council
Gulliksen v Pembrokeshire County Council
Gwilliam v West Hertfordshire Hospital NHS Trust
H v Isle of Wight Council
H v Norfolk County Council
Hadley v Droitwich Construction Co Ltd (Joseph Pugsley & Sons Ltd, third party)
Hagen v ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd
Haig v Bamford
Haimes v Watson
Haira v Burbery Mortgage Finance & Savings Ltd
Haley v London Electricity Board
Halifax plc v Ringrose & Co (a firm)
Hall v Brooklands Auto-Racing Club
Hall v Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust
Hall v London Tramways Co Ltd
Hambro Life Assurance plc v White Young & Partners
Hamilton v Papakura District Council
Hancock Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd, The Casper Trader
Hands v Coopers & Lybrand
Hanks v Ministry of Defence
Hannington v Mite Cleaning (South East) Ltd
Hanson v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Hardaker v Newcastle Health Authority
Harding v Scott-Moncrieff
Hardman v Riddell
Hardy v Central London Rly Co
Hare v British Transport Commission
Harman v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Harrhy v Thames Trains Ltd
Harris v Birkenhead Corpn
Harris v BRB (Residuary) Ltd
Harris v Evans
Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
Harrison v West of Scotland Kart Club
Harrold v Great Western Rly Co
Harrold v Great Western Rly Co
Harrold v Watney
Hart v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Hart v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust
Hartwell v A-G of the British Virgin Islands
Harvey v Northumberland County Council
Harwood v Taylor Vinters (a firm)
Hase v London General Omnibus Co Ltd
Hastie v Edinburgh Magistrates
Hatton v Sutherland; Barber v Somerset County Council; Jones v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council; Bishop v Baker Refractories Ltd
Haward v Fawcetts (a firm)
Hawkins v Cooper
Hawkins v Coulsdon and Purley UDC
Hayward v Drury Lane Theatre Ltd and Moss' Empires Ltd
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
Hegarty v EE Caledonia Ltd
Henderson v Henry E Jenkins & Sons and Evans
Henderson v Merrett Syndicates
Henley v Cameron
Hercules Managements Ltd v Ernst & Young
Herschtal (or Herschthal) v Stewart and Ardern Ltd
Hewett v Alf Brown's Transport Ltd
Hicks v British Transport Commission
Higgs v Foster (trading as Avalon Coaches)
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Hill v James Crowe (Cases) Ltd
Hillen and Pettigrew v ICI (Alkali) Ltd
Hills v Potter
Hill-Venning v Beszant
Hipkins v Jack Cotton Partnership
Hodge & Sons v Anglo-American Oil Co
Hodges v Somerset County Council
Hogan v South Eastern Rly Co
Holden v White
Hole v Ross-Skinner
Holladay v East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust
Holladay v East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust
Holmes v Ashford
Holmes v H Kennard & Son (a firm)
Holmes v North Eastern Rly Co
Holsgrove v South West London Strategic Health Authority
Holt v Edge
Holt v Payne Skillington
Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd, The Starsin
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd
Hone v Benson
Hood v Mitie Property Services (Midlands) Ltd
Hood v Walthamstow UDC
Hooper v Fynmores (a firm)
Horsley v Burton
Horton v Taplin Contracts Ltd
Hosie v Arbroath Football Club Ltd
Hoskin v Rogers
Hotchkiss v Channel Islands Knitwear Co Ltd
Hounsell v Smyth
Hounsell v Smyth
Howard Marine and Dredging Co Ltd v A Ogden & Sons (Excavations) Ltd
Howard v Bemrose
Howard v Furness Houlder Argentine Lines Ltd and A and R Brown Ltd
Howard v Pickfords Ltd
Howe v David Brown Tractors (Retail) Ltd (Rustons Engineering Co Ltd, third party)
Howes v Crombie
Hudson v Elmbridge Borough Council
Hughes v National Union of Mineworkers
Hughes v Richards (t/a Colin Richards & Co)
Humblestone v Martin Tolhurst Partnership (a firm)
Humphery v Bowers
Humpheryes v Nedcon Uk Ltd
Humphrey v Tote Bookmakers Ltd
Humphreys v Dreamland (Margate) Ltd
Hungerfords v Walker
Hunt v T W Johnstone Co Ltd
Hunter v British Coal Corpn
Hunter v Perth & Kinross Council
Hunter v Wright
Hurley v Dyke
Hurstwood Developments Ltd v Motor & General & Andersley & Co Insurance Services Ltd (H B Boring & Co Ltd (Pt 20 defendants))
Hutchins v Maunder
Hutchinson v London and North Eastern Rly Co
ICI Ltd v Shatwell
Ikumene Singapore Pte Ltd v Leong Chee Leng
Independent Advantage Insurance Co v Personal Representatives of Michael Cook (deceased)
Independents' Advantage Insurance Co Ltd v Personal Representatives of Cook (deceased)
Indermaur v Dames
Indermaur v Dames
Ingles v Corp of the City of Toronto
Invercargill City Council v Hamlin
Invercargill City Council v Hamlin
Investors in Industry Commercial Properties Ltd v South Bedfordshire District Council (Ellison & Partners, third parties)
Iron Trades Mutual Insurance Co Ltd v JK Buckenham Ltd
Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
Islington London Borough Council v University College London Hospital NHS Trust
Islington London Borough Council v University College London Hospital NHS Trust
Ivay v Hedges
J v Reading Borough Council
Jackson v Bro Taf Health Authority
Jacobs v LCC
Jaensch v Coffey
James v Butler
Jarvis v Dean
Jarvis v Hampshire CC
Jassi v Gallagher
JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks, Bloom & Co (a firm)
JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks, Bloom & Co (a firm)
Jebson v Ministry of Defence
Jeffrey v Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust
Jemma Trust Co Ltd v Kippax Beaumont Lewis (a firm)
Jemma Trust Co Ltd v Kippax Beaumont Lewis (a firm)
Jenkins v Great Western Rly Co
Jenney (a minor) v North Lincolnshire County Council
Jennings v Cole
Jewson v Gatti
JGF Properties Ltd v Lambeth London Borough
John D Wood Ltd v Knatchbull
John Munroe (Acrylics) Ltd v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority
John Munroe (Acrylics) Ltd v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority
John v Bacon
Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd
Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm)
Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm)
Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm)
Johnson v Unisys Ltd
Johnston v Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust
Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority
Jolley v Sutton London BC
Jolley v Sutton London BC
Jones v Boyce
Jones v Department of Employment
Jones v Fay
Jones v Fay
Jones v Great Western Rly Co
Jones v Hibbert Pownall & Newton
Jones v Lawrence
Jones v Northampton Borough Council
Jones v Steventon
Jones v Sunworld Ltd (now incorporated in JMC Holidays Ltd)
Jordan v Achara
Joyce v Metropolitan Board of Works
Judge v Huntingdon Health Authority
Julian v Rollit Farrell & Bladon
Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co Ltd
K v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Kane v New Forest District Council
Kapfunde v Abbey National plc
Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No 2)
Kearney v Eric Waller Ltd
Kearn-Price v Kent County Council
Keating v Bromley London Borough Council
Kelley v Corston
Kelly v City of Edinburgh District Council
Kennedy v KB van Emden & Co sub nom Kennedy v Emden
Kent v Griffiths
Kent v Griffiths
Khanna v Sombra
Khoo v Gunapathy d/o Muniandy
Kidd v Portsmouth City Council
Killick v PriceWaterhouseCoopers (a firm)
King v Great Western Rly Co
King v Liverpool City Council
King v Phillips
King v Sussex Ambulance NHS Trust
Kirkham v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
Kite v Nolan
Klein v Caluori
Knight v Home Office
Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd
Kubach v Hollands
Kuwait Asia Bank EC v National Mutual Life Nominees Ltd
Kyrris v Oldham, Royle v Oldham
Kyrris v Oldham, Royle v Oldham sub nom Oldham v Kyrris, Royle v Oldham
Kyson v Mick Hemmings Motorcycles
L v Chief Constable of the Thames Valley Police
L v Reading Borough Council
L v Reading Borough Council
Laib v Aravindan (practising as HKH Partnership solicitors)
Lampitt v Poole Borough Council (Taylor, third parties)
Lancashire and Cheshire Association of Baptist Churches Inc v Howard & Seddon Partnership (a firm)
Langbrook Properties Ltd v Surrey County Council
Langley v Dray
Langton v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Lankester v Miller
Larner v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Latchford v Beirne
Latham v R Johnson and Nephew Ltd
Laurence v Lexcourt Holdings Ltd
Laurie v Raglan Building Co Ltd
Laverton v Kiapasha (trading as Takeaway Supreme)
Law Society v KPMG Peat Marwick (sued as KPMG Peat Marwick McLintock)
Law Society v KPMG Peat Marwick (sued as KPMG Peat Marwick McLintock)
Law Society v Sephton & Co
Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council sub nom L v Pembrokeshire County Council
Lawson v Prudential Bache
Lay v Midland Rly Co
Leach v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary
Leake v Targett
Leaver v Pontypridd UDC
Leckie v Caledonian Glass Co Ltd
Lee v Lever
Leeds & Holbeck Building Society v Alex Morison & Co
Legal & General Assurance Ltd v Kirk
Legal & General Assurance Society Ltd v Kirk
Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd, The Aliakmon sub nom Leigh and Sillivan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd, The Aliakmon
Lennon v Metropolitan Police Comr
Letang v Ottawa Electric Rly Co
Lewis v British Columbia
Lewis v London, Chatham and Dover Rly Co
Lewis v Six Continents plc
Lewis v Six Continents plc
Lexmead (Basingstoke) Ltd v Lewis sub nom Lambert v Lewis
Lexus Telecom Ltd v Federation of Communication Services Ltd
Liddle v North Riding of Yorkshire County Council
Liennard v Slough Borough Council
Lilly v T Tilling Ltd and LCC
Lillywhite v University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
Lillywhite v University College London Hospitals' NHS Trust
Lineker v Raleigh Industries Ltd
Ling v Test Valley Borough Council
Lips v Older
Lisa Davidson or Holmes v Governor and Co of the Bank of Scotland
Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd
Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd
Littleton v Cole
Lloyd Cheyham & Co Ltd v Littlejohn & Co
Lloyd v Ogleby
Lloyds TSB Bank Ltd v Cooke-Arkwright (a firm)
Lloyds TSB Bank plc v Edward Symmons & Partners sub nom Lloyds TSB Bank plc v Edward Symmons
LMS International Ltd v Styrene Packaging and Insulation Ltd
Loft v Glatt
London and North Western Rly Co v Hellawell
London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne and Nagel International Ltd
London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority v Meritor Light Vehicle Systems (UK) Ltd
London Graving Dock Co Ltd v Horton
London Tilbury and Southend Rly Co v Paterson
London Underground Ltd v Kenchington Ford plc (Harris & Sutherland, third party)
London, Tilbury and Southend Rly Co v Glasscock
Longstaff v Birtles
Longton v Winwick Asylum Visitors Committee
Lonrho plc v Tebbit
Losinjska Plovidba v Transco Overseas Ltd, The Orjula
Lotus Cars Ltd v Southampton Cargo Handling plc
Lowery v Walker
Luke v Wansbroughs (a firm)
Lygo v Newbold
Lynne Patricia Graham v East Of Scotland Water Authority
Lyons v F W Booth (Contractors) Ltd and Maidstone Borough Council
M v Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust
M v Hendron
Mace v R and H Green and Silley Weir Ltd
Macey v Warwickshire Health Authority
Machen v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly
Madden v Quirk
Maddox v London, Chatham and Dover Rly Co
Maguire v Harland & Wolff plc
Maguire v Lancashire County Council
Maguire v Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
Makepeace v Evans Brothers (Reading) (a firm)
Malfroot v Noxal Ltd
M'Alister (or Donoghue) v Stevenson sub nom Donoghue (or McAlister) v Stevenson sub nom McAlister (or Donoghue) v Stevenson
Maloco v Littlewoods Ltd sub nom Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
Man B & W Diesel S E Asia Pte Ltd v Pt Bumi International Tankers
Man Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft v Freightliner Ltd
Manches & Co (a firm) v Joseph
Mann v Coutts & Co
Manser v Eastern Counties Rly Co
Manser v Eastern Counties Rly Co
Marchant Manufacturing Co Ltd v Leonard D Ford and Teller Ltd
Marfani & Co Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd
Margarine Union GmbH v Cambay Prince Steamship Co Ltd
Markose v Epsom & St Helier NHS Trust
Marney v Scott
Marshall v Osmond
Martel Building Ltd v Canada
Martin v Great Northern Rly Co sub nom Stone v Great Northern Rly Co
Mason v Levy Auto Parts of England Ltd
Mason v Williams and Williams Ltd and Thomas Turton & Sons Ltd
Master Hones (Andrew) Ltd v Cruickshank and Fairweather
Matrix-Securities Ltd v Theodore Goddard (a firm)
Mattis v Pollock (trading as Flamingos Nightclub)
Mattis v Pollock (trading as Flamingo's Nightclub)
McArdle v Andmac Roofing Co
McAuley v Bristol City Council
McCullagh v Lane Fox & Partners Ltd
McDaid v Blair
McDougall v Strathclyde Regional Council
McFarlane v Tayside Health Board
McFarlane v Tayside Health Board
McGeown v Northern Ireland Housing Executive
McInnerny v McDougall
McKay v Essex Area Health Authority
McKinnon v E Surv Ltd (formerly known as GA Valuation and Survey Ltd)
McLaren v British Columbia Institute of Technology
McLean v Pearce Construction South East Ltd
McLean v Weir and Goff
McLelland v Greater Glasgow Health Board
McLoughlin v Warrington Corpn
McMullen v National Coal Board
McNaughton (James) Papers Group Ltd v Hicks Anderson & Co
McTear v Imperial Tobacco Ltd
Mellor v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Melvin v Franklins (Builders) Ltd
Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Hamblin
Mercer v South Eastern and Chatham Rly Co's Managing Committee
Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust
Merlihan v AC Pope Ltd
Merrett v Babb
Merrington v Ironbridge Metal Works Ltd
Metropolitan Rly Co v Jackson
Metropolitan Rly Co v Wright
Metropolitan Rly v Delaney
Meux v Great Eastern Rly Co
Michael Gerson (Investments) Ltd v Haines Watts (Slough)
Middle Temple v Lloyds Bank plc
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Hett, Stubbs & Kemp (a firm)
Milkhu v North West Hospitals NHS Trust
Miller v Evans
Miller v Law Society
Miller v Liverpool Co-operative Society Ltd
Mills v Winchester Diocesan Board of Finance
Minister of Safety and Security v Carmichele
Mirant-Asia Pacific Construction (Hong Kong) Ltd v Ove Arup & Partners International Ltd
Mitchell v Glasgow City Council
M'Laughlin v Pryor
Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil
Moffat v Burges Salmon (a firm)
Moffatt v Bateman
Moloney v Lambeth London Borough Council
Montrod Ltd v Grundkotter Fleischvertriebs-GmbH
Moore v Hampshire County Council
Moore v Maxwells of Emsworth Ltd
Morgan Crucible Co plc v Hill Samuel & Co Ltd sub nom Morgan Crucible Co plc v Hill Samuel Bank Ltd
Morgans v Launchbury
Morland v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
Morley v Staffordshire County Council
Morris v Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust
Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd
Morris v Luton Corpn
Morris v Thyssen (GB) Ltd
Mortgage Express Ltd v S Newman & Co (a firm) (The Solicitors Indemnity Fund Ltd, Pt 20 defendant)
Mottram v South Lancashire Transport Co
Mourton v Poulter
Mowan v London Borough of Wandsworth
Mowbray v Merryweather
Moy v Pettmann Smith (a firm)
Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence
Mulholland and Tedd Ltd v Baker
Mullaney v Chief Constable of West Midlands
Mulligan v McDonagh
Mulligan v McDonagh
Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Co v Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Services Ltd
Mumford v Naylor
Murgatroyd v Blackburn and Over Darwen Tramway Co
Murphy v Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council
Murphy v Brentwood District Council
Murray v Harringay Arena Ltd
Murray v Nicholls
Musgrove v Pandelis
Mutual Life and Citizens' Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt
Mutual Mortgage Corpn Ltd v Bank of Montreal
N v Agrawal
Nabarro v Cope & Co Ltd
Nahhas v Pier House (Cheyne Walk) Management Ltd
Nance v British Columbia Electric Rly Co Ltd
Nation v King's Healthcare NHS Trust
Nationwide Building Society v Thimbleby & Co
Naylor (t/a Mainstreet) v Payling sub nom Payling v Naylor (t/a Mainstreet)
Neindorf v Junkovic
Nelhams v Sandells Maintenance Ltd
Nettleship v Weston
New Zealand Guardian Trust Co Ltd v Brooks
Newberry v Bristol Tramways and Carriage Co Ltd
Newbold v Ministry of Defence
Newcastle Building Society v Paterson, Robertson & Graham
Newell v Ministry of Defence
Newton v Edgerley
Nicholson v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Nicholson v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Nilsson v Redditch Borough Council
Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Milestone Trading Ltd
Noble v De Boer
Normans Bay Ltd (formerly Illingworth Morris Ltd) v Coudert Brothers (a firm)
North v TNT Express UK Ltd
Norton v Canadian Pacific Steamships Ltd
Norwich City Council v Harvey
Nova Mink Ltd v Trans-Canada Airlines
Nyarko v Newham Primary Care Trust
NZ Forest Products Ltd v A-G
Oakdene Ltd v John Martlew and Co
Oakes v Minister of War Transport
Oates v Anthony Pittman & Co (a firm)
Ocloo v Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust
O'Connor v British Transport Commission
O'Connor v DN Decor (a firm)
Official Solicitor v Allison
O'Gara v Paul John Construction (Leicester) Ltd
Ogwang v Redbridge Healthcare NHS Trust
Ogwo v Taylor
Oldham v Sheffield Corpn
Oliver v Birmingham and Midland Motor Omnibus Co Ltd
OLL Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
Orange v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
Ormrod v Crosville Motor Services Ltd
Osborne v London and North Western Rly Co
Owen v Great Western Rly Co
Oxford University Fixed Assets Ltd v Architects Design Partnership (a firm) (Tarmac Construction (Contracts) Ltd, third party)
Oxus Gold plc (formerly Oxus Mining plc) v Templeton Insurance Ltd
Pacific Associates Inc v Baxter
Palmer v Barclays Bank Ltd
Palmer v Durnford Ford (a firm)
Palmer v Tees Health Authority
Palmer v Tees Health Authority
Pannett v P McGuinness & Co Ltd
Pantam (or Panton) v Isham
Parish v Judd
Parker v London General Omnibus Co Ltd
Parker v Miller
Parker v Oloxo Ltd and Senior
Parker v PFC Flooring Supplies Ltd
Parker-Tweedale v Dunbar Bank plc
Parkinson v Liverpool Corpn
Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust
Parry v Smith
Partco Group Ltd v Wragg
Partco Group Ltd v Wragg
Pasternack v Poulton
Patel v Daybells (a firm)
Paterson Zochonis & Co Ltd v Merfarken Packaging Ltd
Pattendon v Beney
Payne v Maple Leaf Gardens Ltd, Stewart and Marucci
Peabody Donation Fund (Governors) v Sir Lindsay Parkinson & Co Ltd
Pearson v Coleman Bros
Pearson v Lambeth Borough Council
Pearson v Lightning
Penn v Bristol and West Building Society
Pennington v Simpson
Pennington v Simpson
Penny v Northampton Borough Council
Perkowski v Wellington Corpn
Perl (P) (Exporters) Ltd v Camden London Borough Council
Perre v Apand Pty Ltd
Perrett v Collins
Perring v Rebutter
Perry v Kendricks Transport Ltd
Perry v Thomas Wrigley Ltd
Perzow v Bourne Leisure Ltd
Phelps v Great Eastern Rly Co
Phelps v Great Eastern Rly Co
Phelps v Hillingdon London BC
Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, Anderton v Clwyd County Council, Jarvis v Hampshire County Council, Re G (a minor)
Philco Radio and Television Corpn of Great Britain Ltd v J Spurling Ltd
Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Co
Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Co
Phillips v Ford Motor Co of Canada Ltd
Phipps v Rochester Corpn
Pickard v Smith
Pickard v Smith
Pike v Dear
Pimm v Roper
Pimm v Roper
Pirelli General Cable Works Ltd v Oscar Faber & Partners
Pitcher v Huddersfield Town Football Club Ltd
Pitt v Jackson
Pivovaroff v Chernabaeff
Plampin v Havering NHS Primary Care Trust
Plant Construction plc v Clive Adams Associates
Plant v Midland Rly Co
Plater v Sonatrach
Platform Home Loans Ltd v Oyston Shipways Ltd
Poll v Viscount Asquith of Morley
Popat v Barnes
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Group Litigation, Re, Multiple Claimants v Ministry of Defence
Potter v Faulkner
Potter v Faulkner
Powell v Boladz sub nom Powell v Boldaz
Powell v Whitman Breed Abbot & Morgan
Praeger v Bristol and Exeter Rly Co
Pratley v Surrey County Council
Pratley v Surrey County Council
Pratt v Patrick
Precis (521) plc v William M Mercer Ltd
Preferred Mortgages Ltd v Bradford and Bingley Estate Agencies Ltd
Price Waterhouse v Kwan
Primavera v Allied Dunbar plc
Prince v Gregory
Pritchard v Peto
Proctor v Harris
Prosser v Castle Sanderson Solicitors (a firm)
PT Royal Bali Leisure v Hutchinson & Co Trust Co Ltd
Purkis v Walthamstow Borough Council
Purves v Landell
Pym v Great Northern Rly Co
Pym v Great Northern Rly Co
Pyrenees Shire Council v Day; Eskimo Amber Pty Ltd v Pyrenees Shire Council
Qazi v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Qualcast (Wolverhampton) Ltd v Haynes
Qureshi v Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust
R (on the application of A) v Secretary for the Home Department; R (on the application of Kanidagli) v Secretary for the Home Department
R (on the application of Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner
R (on the application of Lewin) v DPP
R M Turton & Co Ltd (in liquidation) v Kerslake
R v Adomako
R v Bateman
R v Harrow London Borough Council, ex p Coker
R v Khan
R v Misra
R v Misra
R v Stone, R v Dobinson
R v Wacker
R v Willoughby
Radburn v Kemp
Radley v London Passenger Transport Board
Railways Comr v McDermott
Railways Comr v Quinlan
Raja (administratrix of the estate of Raja (decd)) v Austin Gray (a firm)
Raja (administratrix of the estate of Raja (decd)) v Austin Gray (a firm)
Rambarran v Gurrucharran
Ramoo, son of Erulapan v Gan Soo Swee
Rashid v Essex Rivers NHS Healthcare Trust
Ratcliff v McConnell
Rattee v Norwich Electric Tramway Co
Rawsthorne v Ottley
Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd
Reed v Connells Estate Agents (a firm)
Rees v Saville
Reeves v Metropolitan Police Comr
Reffell v Surrey County Council
Regent Leisuretime Ltd v Skerrett
Regent Leisuretime Ltd v Skerrett
Rehman v University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
Reid v Rush & Tompkins Group plc
Revill v Newbery
Reynolds v North Tyneside Health Authority
Rhind v Astbury Water Park Ltd
Rhind v Astbury Water Park Ltd
Rice v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry; Thompson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
Rich (Marc) & Co AG v Bishop Rock Marine Co Ltd, The Nicholas H
Richards v Easto
Richards v Great Eastern Rly Co
Richardson v Great Eastern Rly Co
Richardson v Metropolitan Rly Co
Richardson v Metropolitan Rly Co
Richardson v Pitt-Stanley
Richardson v West Lindsey District Council
Richley v Faull
Richmond Medical Agency Ltd v Bassom
Rickards v Jones
Ricketts v Erith Borough Council
Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire
Rigg v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Rigg v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Riley v Pickersgill
Rimmer v Liverpool City Council
Roberts v J Hampson & Co
Robertson v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Robertson v Ridley
Robinson v Adair
Robinson v Northumbria Police Authority
Robson v North Eastern Rly Co
Rogers v Rhymney Rly Co
Roles v Corney
Roles v Nathan
Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd v Lister
Rondel v Worsley
Ross Harper & Murphy v Banks
Rossiter v Tilsley
Roughton v Weston Area Health Authority
Roughton v Weston Area Health Authority
Rowe v Herman
Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd
Rushmer v Countrywide Surveyors (1994) Ltd
Russell v Wincanton Ltd
Ryan v Camden London Borough
Ryan v Corp of the City of Victoria
Ryeford Homes Ltd and Mewburn Property Co Ltd v Sevenoaks District Council
S v Gloucestershire CC, L v Tower Hamlets London BC
Sabri-Tabrizi v Lothian Health Board
Saddington v Colleys Professional Services
Sahib Foods Ltd v Paskin Kyriakides Sands
Sahib Foods Ltd v Paskin Kyriakides Sands (a firm)
Salliss (Michael) & Co Ltd v Calil and William F Newman & Associates
Salmon v Seafarer Restaurants Ltd
Salter v UB Frozen and Chilled Foods Ltd
Sandhar v Department of Transport Environment and the Regions
Sandhar v Department of Transport, Environment & the Regions sub nom Sandhar v Department of Transport, Environment
Sandhu Menswear Co Ltd v Woolworths plc
Sasea Finance Ltd (in liquidation) v KPMG (formerly KPMG Peat Marwick McLintock (a firm))
Savory v Holland Hannen and Cubitts (Southern) Ltd
Sayers v Clarke-Walker (a firm)
Scheck v Dart
Schiffahrt und Kohlen GmbH v Chelsea Maritime Ltd, The Irene's Success
Schlarb v London and North Eastern Rly Co
Schofield v Bolton Corpn
SCM (UK) Ltd v WJ Whittall & Son Ltd
Scott v Foley Aikman & Co
Scott-Whitehead v National Coal Board
Scutts v Keyse
Searle v Prentice
Serrano v South West London and St George's Mental Health Trust
Seymour v Caroline Ockwell & Co
Shaddock (L) & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council
Shankie-Williams v Heavey
Sharp v Grey
Sharp v Highland and Islands Fire Board
Sharpe (by his mother and litigation friend) v Addison (trading as Addison Lister)
Sharpe v Addison (t/a Addison Lister)
Sharpe v E T Sweeting & Son Ltd
Sharpe v Southern Rly Co
Shaw Savill and Albion Co Ltd v Commonwealth
Shaw v Redbridge London Borough Council
Sheehan v Dreamland (Margate) Ltd
Sheldon-Green v Coventry Health Authority
Shepherd v Midland Rly Co
Sherlock v Chester City Council
Shiells v Blackburne
Shiffman v Grand Priory in British Realm of Venerable Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem
Shirley v D J Freeman (a firm)
Shoebottom v Egerton
Shoebottom v Egerton
Short v Great Western Rly Co
Shrewsbury's (Countess) Case sub nom Salop (Countess) v Crompton
Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital
Siddell v Smith Cooper & Partners (a firm)
Silverman v Imperial London Hotels Ltd
Simaan General Contracting Co v Pilkington Glass Ltd (No 2)
Simkiss v Rhondda Borough Council
Simmons v Huntingdon Corpn
Simms v Leigh Rugby Football Club Ltd
Simon v London General Omnibus Co Ltd
Simonds v Isle of Wight Council
Simons v Winslade
Simson (or Simpson) v London General Omnibus Co sub nom Smith v London General Omnibus Co
Siner v Great Western Rly Co
Singh v Camden London Borough Council
Singh v Libra Holidays Ltd
Singleton v Eastern Counties Rly Co
Six Continents Retail Ltd v Carford Catering Equipment Ltd
Skeen v British Railways Board
Skinner v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Slade v Battersea and Putney Group Hospital Management Committee
Slattery v Moore Stephens (a firm)
Smiley v Home Office
Smith (a child suing by his father and litigation friend) v Sheridan
Smith v Airtours plc
Smith v Austin Lifts Ltd
Smith v Bradford Metropolitan Council
Smith v Eric S Bush (a firm), Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
Smith v Great Eastern Rly Co
Smith v Great Eastern Rly Co
Smith v Harris
Smith v Havering London Borough Council
Smith v London and St Katharine Docks Co
Smith v London and St Katharine Docks Co
Smith v Steele
Smith v West Yorkshire Health Authority (formerly Leeds Health Authority)
Smithers v Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust
Smoldon v Whitworth
Society of Lloyd's v Laws
Sole v W J Hallt Ltd
Somatra Ltd v Sinclair Roche & Temperley
Somatra Ltd v Sinclair Roche & Temperley; Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Somatra Ltd
South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd (sub nom Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd)
South Pacific Manufacturing Co Ltd v New Zealand Security Consultants & Investigations Ltd
Southern Portland Cement Ltd v Cooper
Sparks v HSBC plc
Spencer v Boots The Chemist Ltd
Speshal Investments Ltd v Corby Kane Howard Partnership Ltd (trading as HBSV)
Spring v Guardian Assurance plc
Springett v Ball
Springett v Ball
Standard Chartered Bank Ltd v Walker
Stanners (RG) Ltd v High Wycombe Borough Council
Stapley v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Stapley v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
State of New South Wales v Lepore and related appeals
Stead v Bligh
Stennett v Hancock and Peters
Stephens v Anglian Water Authority
Stevens v Blaenau Gwent County Borough
Stevenson v Glasgow Corpn
Stevenson v Morrison Construction
Stewart v East Cambridgeshire District Council
Stewart v Hancock
Stewart v Pettie
Stiefsohn v Brooke
Stockdale v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Stockdale v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
Stockley v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Stokes v Eastern Counties Rly Co
Stokes v Eastern Counties Rly Co
Stone v Taffe
Stowell v Railway Executive
Strickland v Hertfordshire County Council
Strover v Harrington
Sturge v Hackett
Sturges v Great Western Rly Co
Sullivan v Moody, Thompson v Connon
Sullivan v South Glamorgan County Council
Summit Financial Group Ltd v Slaughter & May (a firm)
Sunrise Crane, The
Surtees v Hughes
Surtees v Kingston-upon-Thames Borough Council
Sutcliffe v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Sutcliffe v Clients Investment Co Ltd
Sutcliffe v Sayer
Sutcliffe v Thackrah
Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council
Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council
Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council
Sutton v Bootle Corpn
Swain v Puri
Swinfen v Lord Chelmsford
Swinfen v Lord Chelmsford
Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police
Sykes v Harry
Syme v Scottish Borders Council
T (a minor) v Surrey County Council sub nom Harrison v Surrey County Council
T v Boys & Girls Welfare Service
Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd
Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations PTY Ltd
Targett v Torfaen Borough Council
Tart v G W Chitty & Co Ltd sub nom Tart v G W Chitty
Tartan American Machinery Corpn v Swan & Co
Taylor (J) & Sons Ltd v Union-Castle Mail Steamship Co Ltd
Taylor v Lawrence Fraser (Bristol) Ltd
Taylor v Leslie
Taylor v Weston Area Health Authority
Tebbutt v Bristol and Exeter Rly Co
Templeman v Haydon
Templiss Properties Ltd v Hyams
Tennant v J Sainsbury plc
Tesco Stores Ltd v Costain Construction Ltd and other applications
Thake v Maurice
Thames Trains Ltd v Health and Safety Executive
Thatcher v Great Western Rly Co
Thomas Australia Wholesale Vehicle Trading Co Pty Ltd v Marac Finance Australia Ltd
Thomas v British Railways Board
Thompson v Bankstown Municipal Council
Thompson v Bradford
Thompson v Bradford
Thompson v Home Office
Thompson v James
Thompson v Schmidt
Thomson v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd
Thomson v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd
Thomson v Kvaerner Govan Ltd
Tidy v Battman
Titchener v British Railways Board sub nom McGinlay (or Titchener) v British Railways Board
Toal v North British Rly Co
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council
Toomey v London Brighton and South Coast Rly Co sub nom Tooney v London Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Topp v London Country Bus (South West) Ltd
Torette House Property Ltd v Berkman
Transco plc v United Utilities Water plc
Travers v Gloucester Corpn
Tremain v Pike
Tremayne v Hill
Trinder v Great Western Rly Co
Trotman v British Railways Board
Trustees of WASPS Football Club v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd sub nom Montlake (as Trustees of WASPS Football Club v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd)
Tuke v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust
Turner v Arding and Hobbs Ltd
Tutton v AD Walter Ltd
University of Keele v Price Waterhouse (a firm)
Unwin v West Sussex County Council
Vahidi v Fairstead House School Trust Ltd
Vahidi v Fairstead House School Trust Ltd
Van Oppen v Clerk to the Bedford Charity Trustees
Vandyke v Fender (Sun Insurance Office Ltd, third party)
Various Claimants v Bryn Alyn Community Homes Ltd
Venables v Baring Bros & Co
Vernon v Bosley sub nom Vernon v Bosley (disclosure of evidence in family proceedings) sub nom Vernon v Bosley (expert evidence)
Vicar of Writtle v Essex County Council
Videan v British Transport Commission
Vision Golf Ltd v Weightmans (a firm)
Vision Golf Ltd v Weightmans (a firm)
Vogan & Co v Oulton
Vowles v Evans
Vowles v Evans
Vulic v Bilinsky
W v Essex County Council
W v Surrey County Council
Wagner v West Ham Corpn
Waite v North Eastern Rly Co
Walder v Hammersmith Borough Council
Walker v Geo H Medlicott & Son
Walker v Midland Rly Co
Walker v Midland Rly Co
Walker v Northumberland County Council
Wallis v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance
Walsh v Redfern
Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
Ward v General Omnibus Co
Ward v Hertfordshire County Council
Wardell-Yerburgh v Surrey County Council
Warmisham v Kenneth Beavis & Co (a firm)
Warren v London General Omnibus Co
Waters v Metropolitan Police Comr
Watkins v Great Western Rly Co
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd
Watson v Buckley Osborne Garrett & Co Ltd and Wyrovoys Products Ltd
Wattleworth v Goodwood Road Racing Co Ltd
Waugh v James K Allan Ltd
Weigall v Westminster Hospital
Weir v Graham
Weldon v GRE Linked Life Assurance Ltd
Welfare v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Welfare v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institute
Weller v London, Brighton and South Coast Rly Co
Wells v Cooper
Wells v Wiltshire and Dorset Bus Co Ltd
Welsh v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police
Welsh v Lawrence
Wessanen Foods Ltd v Jofson Ltd
West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd v El-Safty
West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd v El-Safty
West Bromwich Building Society v Mander Hadley
West Wiltshire District Council v Garland sub nom West Wiltshire District Council v Garland (Cond, third party)
Westbury v Sampson
Western Scottish Motor Traction Co Ltd v Fernie (or Allam)
Weston v Gribben
Whatman v Pearson sub nom Whitman v Pearson
Whatman v Pearson sub nom Whitman v Pearson
Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd
Wheatley v Patrick
Wheeler v Copas
Whelan v North West London Hospital NHS Trust
White v Blackmore
White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police sub nom Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
White v France
White v Jones
White v Lidl UK GmbH
White v St Albans City and District Council
Whittaker v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rly Co
Whittle v Bennet
Whyte v Redland Aggregates Ltd
Wicks v Macnamara
Wigg v British Railways Board
Wilby v Midland Rly Co
Wilks (formerly infant) v Cheltenham Home Guard Motor Cycle and Light Car Club
William Laurence Simpson v Transocean Offshore (UK) Inc
Williams v Cardiff Corpn
Williams v Great Western Rly Co
Williams v McCombie
Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd
Williams v Owen
Williams v Richards
Wilson Sons & Co Ltd v Barry Rly Co
Wilson v Best Travel Ltd
Winch v Thames Conservators
Wing v London General Omnibus Co
Winter v Cardiff RDC
Winterbottom v Wright
Wintle v Bristol Tramways and Carriage Co Ltd
Winward v TVR Engineering Ltd
Wisbech RDC v Ward
Withers v North Kent Rly Co sub nom Withers v Great Northern Rly Co
Woodhouse v Wright Johnston and Mackenzie
Woodman v Richardson and Concrete Ltd
Woodward v Hastings Corpn
Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (formerly Cardno & Davies Australia Pty Ltd)
Wooldridge v Sumner
Woolwich plc v Jones-Dunross; Ombull v Sherrards Solicitors (a firm)
Woolworths plc v Henry Boot Management Ltd
Worby v Rosser
Wormald v H J Walker & Co
Wright v Eastwood
Wright v Lefever
Wright v London and North Western Rly Co
Wright v London General Omnibus Co
Wright v Romford Blinds and Shutters Ltd
Wyatt v Curtis
Wyborn v Great Northern Rly Co
X and others (minors) v Bedfordshire County Council, M (a minor) v Newham London Borough Council, E (a minor) v Dorset County Council
Yachuk v Oliver Blais Co Ltd
Yianni v Edwin Evans & Sons
Yorkshire Bank plc v Lloyd's Bank plc
Young v Kent County Council
Young v Post Office
Young v Purdy
Yuen Kun Yeu v A-G
Yuen Kun-yeu v A-G of Hong Kong
Z v United Kingdom (Application 29392/95)
Zimbabwe Banking Corp Ltd v Pyramid Motor Corp (Pvt) Ltd


text:
Respond to Review of Balti Drambliai Vegetarine Kavine
by shapesh1ft
Review: Ate here two times during our visit in Vilnius. Compared to reviews the food was disappointing. Tibetan dumplings were ok, eggplant curry was not seasoned well, except being too salty. Falafels were like rocks and yet again there were no flavors present. Many vegan dishes were not available as there was lack of certain ingredients. Service was passive, as almost always in eastern Europe. Quite low prices reflect the small size of the dishes. Maybe dishes of the day are ok, don't know because according the waitress they were not vegan. Customers are mostly students and there is some indian style music playing.
You must login to post a response
Login | Register (see member benefits)
Login | Register (see member benefits)

subset: commoncrawl


text:
We are MarsBased
Development from out of this world
We are a development shop highly specialized in Ruby on Rails. Our team is mostly based in Barcelona, but we work remotely at an international level.
We build our apps using Ruby on Rails, AngularJS, Elastic search, HTML5, CSS3, Sass and other awesome state-of-the-art technologies, while applying agile development methodologies.
We are a development shop with startup DNA. Largely inspired by the Lean Startup methodology, we develop applications the artisan way while getting involved with your company's business strategy, building elegant and high-quality solutions. More than a provider, we become your partner all throughout the project.
If you want us to develop for you, contact us now for a free chat!
What we offer
We are there from beginning to end
App Design
Our elegant designs are based on HTML5, CSS3 and front-end frameworks. Our apps are designed to enhance UX, offer pixel-level detail and cross-device and -platform compatibility.
At MarsBased we develop using Ruby on Rails & Angular JS. We boost our productivity with agile methodologies and fully tested apps to offer you elegant, scalable & maintainable solutions.
Don't worry about having to set up your environments. We prepare and automate the installation & deployment of your app. Everything's stored in the cloud, accessible at all times.
Monitoring & Support
Sit back and relax. After the development and deployment, we monitor your application and take care of it for as long as you need. We will continuously report to you with only relevant data.
UX is everything
Simple, elegant and smooth, our designs reach pixel-level detail. Design is how something works, so our designs are centered around usability and functionality.
Ridin' the wave
At MarsBased we use state-of-the-art technologies and the latest development trends. In the MarsBased spaceship there's no place for obsolete technologies.
Beyond the borders
The MarsBased crew speaks many languages. Common understanding lies beyond language and physical barriers. Wherever you live, whatever language you speak, we adapt to your needs.
Success Stories
Read about our apps, projects & initiatives
New portal for the Barcelona City Council
The Barcelona City Council & the Gremi d'Hotels de Barcelona created a new program to foster entrepreneurship in the tourism area.
This website uses the latest trends in responsive design. The client specifically requested to break away from old-school corporate looks.
This project was developed in conjunction with Evil Martians in a Martian alliance to bring the best results. Awaiting official presentation to be published.
New portal for the Barcelona City Council
MVP for new platform
PisosBancos.com contacted us to rewrite their platform from scratch. After having multiple providers, their app had too much legacy.
We built an MVP for them to keep up with their business model while building a new architecture to serve both PisosBancos and SubastasDe.
We just finished the first part of this project, where a pure Rails app was built to be improved in the coming months.
MVP for new platform
MVP for new platform
SubastasDe.com contacted us to redo their platform from scratch. After having multiple providers, their app had too much legacy.
We built an MVP for them to keep up with their business model while building a new architecture to serve both PisosBancos and SubastasDe.
We just finished the first part of this project, where a pure Rails app was built to be improved in the coming months.
MVP for new platform
Eureka Experts
Online assessment by experts
Eureka Startups is evolving again to become the definitive Spanish speaking platform of choice for online assessment through videocall.
This Rails+AngularJS app integrates with Tokbox to bring a scalable solution for the Spanish speaking community.
Currently on private beta. Expected launch date: June 2015.
Eureka Experts
Online assessment by experts
Barcelona Startup Map
The entrepreneurial ecosystem of Barcelona
Barcelona has built up a very powerful entrepreneurial ecosystem. The number of startups, investors, accelerators and other players is growing rapidly.
Together with the Barcelona City Council & Barcelona Activa, we've developed Barcelona Startup Map, an app that displays the status of the Barcelona entrepreneurial ecosystem. Join the others and sign up to be featured in the map!
Barcelona Startup Map
The entrepreneurial ecosystem of Barcelona
Startup Grind Barcelona
Website & Technological Partner
MarsBased is the technological partner of Startup Grind Barcelona.
We have developed an elegant informational website for Startup Grind Barcelona to help them promote the event and get in touch with the local community.
Startup Grind is a monthly event that inspires, educates and connects entrepreneurs worldwide, powered by Google for Entrepreneurs.
Startup Grind Barcelona
Website & Technological Partner
Startup Circle in Barcelona
Supporting the local scene
We have created a startup circle of trust with a group of local startups and entrepreneurs. The main purpose of this circle is to help one another grow through collaboration and teamwork. The circle allows each member to focus on what they're best at by delegating tasks among the others.
If you want to read more about our startup circle, follow our social profiles and stay tuned. If you want to join, drop us a line at email@example.com.
Startup Circle in Barcelona
Supporting the local scene
Where all your recipes want to be
Born to be our first product, Cookin.me will become your favourite cookbook.
Are you a professional chef? Have you recently taken up cooking lessons? Want to show off your sushi skills? Cookin.me is a digital cookbook where you can create, edit and organize all of your cooking recipes. Easy as a pie.
The Cookin.me project has been discontinued until further notice.


text:
In the marshlands by emonteonWatch
©2008-2016 emonteon
I have always liked Dhalsim more than any of the other characters. To me he seems more unique and mysterious. Like Dhalsim, Blanka has been a favorite too even though both are difficult to maneuver. Critique and enjoy. Keep playing SF. Its fun.
Really good pic. Very atmospheric.
Blanka's skin is really nicely rendered.
Blanka's skin is really nicely rendered.
Good color choice(stands out for that). The background looks good..its a adequate setting.....I don't see why there should be shadows of grape leaves casted on blanca's back. Dhalsim's left foot is a lil too big....referencing real hand poses wouldn't hurt at first. Minor adjustments here and there and this could make an even better pic.


text:
The 20-year-old will link up with Paul Lambert's side on a 93-day agreement in order to get some regular first-team football under his belt
Russell Slade's men can record successive wins for the first time this season if they back up the victory over Huddersfield last week
Alberto Paloschi looks set to make his debut at the Liberty Stadium
Guidolin has heaped praise on the shoulders of his new striker who joined the Swans for £8m from Italian club Chievo
Exiles boss banned from the touchline for one game and fined £500 after admitting using abusive and/or insulting words towards a match official at end of 1-0 defeat at Leyton Orient
Martinez was spotted at Derulo's gig in Manchester on Thursday and he confirmed he was the man in a video posted on Twitter
The Togo striker publicly criticised Swansea's Head Coach before leaving Monaco to begin Premier League career
Slade's contract is up at the end of the season and there is no dign yet of discussions over a new deal
Lawrence has joined Cardiff on loan until the end of the season from Leicester and could well make his debut as Slade's men entertain MK Dons on Saturday
Will Tom Lawrence and Kenneth Zohore be part of Slade's plans for MK Dons clash?
The new Swans boss has revealed exactly how many points he think his side needs to keep their Premier League status next season
The popular computer game has simulated the rest of the season and tips Cardiff City to finish sixth, with the Swans securing the Premier League status
Guidolin has relished watching Guardiola transform Bayern Munich
Guidolin also spoke of being pleased that the club were able to complete a deadline day deal for Leroy Fer
The Bluebirds entertain the MK Dons in the Championship, and there's a strong Cardiff City connection in the opposition team
Poole joined the Red Devils in a deadline day transfer at the start of the season, but is yet to make his first team debut
Shelvey struggled against Everton last night, and was teased on Twitter by Swansea director John van Zweden
Francesco Guidolin will be speaking to the press this afternoon
The Spanish star has spoken of his love for Swansea and his desire to one day return to the club
Coleman picked a team from people he played with and against in his playing days for FourFourTwo magazine
The former Swansea man endured a torrid evening at Goodison Park against Ross Barkley, and Swansea fans quite enjoyed it
Wales Online
For the latest local news straight to your Twitter, Facebook feed, e-mail inbox or tablet.
Is there something happening in your area you would like us to report on?
Tell us about it and, if possible, send us a picture
We reach over 1,384,563* unique users a month with dedicated coverage of all things Welsh.
To book an advert with WalesOnline call 029 2024 4296 or 029 2022 2444, email email@example.com or visit Media Wales website for more information
WalesOnline is part of Media Wales, publisher of the Western Mail, South Wales Echo, Wales on Sunday and the seven Celtic weekly titles, offering you unique access to our audience across Wales online and in print.
For all general advertising enquiries please ring 029 2022 2444, or for recruitment advertising, please ring 029 2000 7207.
Editor, WalesOnline
Ceri has been editor of WalesOnline since April 2012. She was previously executive editor of Media Wales and deputy editor of the Western Mail. She started her career on the Glamorgan Gazette.


text:
Remove ads with our VIP Service
Share This Page
- Cars [2006]
- The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe [2005]
- Finding Nemo [2003]
- Meet the Robinsons [2007]
- Meet the Robinsons in 3D [2007]
- Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End [2007]
- Ratatouille [2007]
Add Your Comments
- Denon Releases DTS:X Firmware for AVR-X7200WA [1/28]
- Denon Plans DTS:X Firmware Upgrades in January/February 2016, Marantz in February/March [12/17]
- Adding Height Speakers for a Dolby Atmos Installation - Comparison Test [9/17]
- Samsung Unveils First UltraHD Blu-ray Player, Fox Promises Movies [9/3]
- DTS Releases More Details About DTS:X for Home Theaters [4/9]
- Video Interview with Joe Kane on the Future of TV, Ultra HD, and more [2/5]
- DTS Reveals DTS:X Immersive Sound Technology [1/8]
- High-Def Digest Goes Hands-On with a Pioneer Dolby Atmos Sound System [9/30]
- Integra Delivers Firmware Update to Enable Dolby Atmos [9/30]
- Onkyo Delivers Firmware Update to Enable Dolby Atmos [9/30]
More Home Theater Articles
Journal Main Page
Subscribe to Journal RSS feeds
To help the buying public understand what the Blu-ray high definition format has to offer, Disney took it upon themselves to create the "Magical Blu-ray Tour," which is a travelling exhibit that visits malls and other events. My original post on the tour from July 2007 when the tour kicked off had this photo of the display:
When Disney announced some 2008 Blu-ray releases at CES, they also mentioned that the tour would continue to more cities, but no schedule details were available. In a press release from Friday, they announced that seven cities will be visited by the Magical Blu-ray Tour, beginning with the Yorkdale Shopping Center in Toronto, Canada this past weekend.
"Last year, thousands of consumers in each market stopped by our Blu-ray Tour exhibit to better educate themselves on the Blu-ray format and its numerous technological advancements," stated Bob Chapek, president of Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment. "The success of this interactive and educational vehicle helped clear up many misperceptions about high-definition in general. With that said, we are thrilled to be able to extend the tour into 2008."
The rest of the locations and dates are:
|Yorkdale Shopping Center
|Toronto, Canada
|January 25-27
|Westfarms Mall
|Farmington, CT
|February 15-18
|Triangle Town Center
|Raleigh, NC
|February 22-24
|Cool Springs Galleria
|Nashville, TN
|February 28 - March 1
|North East Mall
|Hurst, TX
|March 7-9
|Flat Iron Crossing
|Denver, CO
|March 14-16
|UNITY 2008 Convention
|Chicago, IL
|July 23-27
Disney's 2008 Magical Blu-ray Tour will feature previews of upcoming title releases, Finding Nemo and The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe; live demonstrations where consumers will get first-hand experience playing the interactive "Gusteau's Gourmet Game" from Ratatouille, "Car Finder Game" from Disney/Pixar's Cars, "Bowler Hat Barrage" from Meet The Robinsons; as well as experience a virtual tour of "Enter the Maelstrom" from Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. The Tour helps bring this to life via six interactive stations showcasing all aspects of the Blu-ray Disc technology and a special mini-theater that hosts hourly live presentations on Blu-ray high-definition technology.
Panasonic is working with Disney on this tour, so you'll be able to see Blu-ray players and HDTV's from Panasonic on display.
Visitors will also have the opportunity to enter to win three prizes, including
- a full home entertainment package of a Panasonic 50" HDTV, a Panasonic Blu-ray player, and 10 Blu-ray titles from Disney
- Sony Playstation 3 and two Blu-ray titles from Disney
- five Blu-ray titles from Disney
Source: Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment Press Release
After a weekend visit to three locations of the same big box retailer, whose blue and yellow logo will remain anonymous, tours like this should be a better way for good information to get out about the Blu-ray format. If you are interested in what it has to offer, check through the articles I've written in the Home Theater section of the Journal, as well as some of the resources that we have listed on the Home Theater Links page.
Whatever you do, don't count on big box retailers to supply you with information. While I'm sure that there are some big box employees that have good information, I have yet to find them. For the kind of money that these players represent, you would do well to educate yourself before making a purchase. Specialty A/V retailers can be a valuable resource, but be sure to temper their opinions and recommendations with your own knowledge as well.
Add Your Comments
Reader Comments
No comments found. Be the first and let us know what you think!
Add Your Comments
|Please login
|Commenting on Journal Articles is available only to our readers who have customized this site, which makes it easier for you to complete the form and for us to contact you with any questions or concerns about your comments.
Please login or register a new account before continuing.
Already Registered?
Log in to retrieve your saved settings.
Forget Your Passcode?Send My Passcode To Me
Not Registered? Create a New Account!
Our registered members enjoy more features, including:
- Save Your Location -- the site remembers your location, no having to re-enter it each time you visit
- Favorite Theaters List -- keep a handy list of the theaters you attend
- Favorite Movies List - movies you want to see, all in one place
- Write Movie Reviews -- share your opinions of the movies you see
- Block Ads with VIP Service -- view this site ad free (subscription req'd)
Basic accounts are free -- sign up today!
Concerned About Privacy?
So are we! We won't sell, trade, or share your personal information with anyone unless required by law. For more information, please read our Privacy Policy.
Journal/Blog - The Marquee - Movie Links - News and Events - Now Showing - Reader Reviews
Customize - VIP Service
|The BigScreen Cinema Guide is a service of SVJ Designs LLC. All graphics, layout, and structure of this service (unless otherwise specified) are Copyright © 1995-2016, SVJ Designs. The BigScreen Cinema Guide is a trademark of SVJ Designs. All rights reserved.
'ACADEMY AWARDS®' and 'OSCAR®' are the registered trademarks and service marks of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.


text:
BETHEL, Maine (AP) � A Maine man is dead after an early morning house fire in Bethel.
Maine fire marshals are trying to determine the cause of the fire, which was reported at 4:40 a.m. A woman and young boy escaped with minor injuries.
Firefighters say the single family house on Elm Street was engulfed in flames when they arrived.
Officials are not yet releasing the identities of the man who died and the two injured occupants.
Comments are currently unavailable on this article
Location, ST | website.com


text:
- Other Operating Systems (8)
- Windows (8)
- Linux (6)
- Mac (6)
- Grouping and Descriptive Categories (5)
- Android (4)
- Embedded Operating Systems (1)
- Emulation and API Compatibility (1)
Top Apps
- Audio & Video
- Business & Enterprise
- Communications
- Development
- Home & Education
- Games
- Graphics
- Science & Engineering
- Security & Utilities
- System Administration
uDOS is a free operating system built on the FreeDOS kernel with DJGPP. uDOS provides an integrated suite of features inluding Perl, Python, etc., as well as a Watt-32 based networking environment and ELF library support. Can be run live from CD image.4 weekly downloads
Project 16
A project to make an epic as fuck modern 16bit dos game that can run.2 weekly downloads
DBFRecordset is a C++ class that allows programmers to operate on .DBF table files. It resembles ADO used in VB 6.0 in operation.2 weekly downloads
DLIP: Desktop List of Installed Programs
A central database of all installable programs, descriptions, dependencies, source URLs, MD5 sums, and suggested menu listings and the software to read the database, usable by desktops and window managers to organize software and install any new software2 weekly downloads
JaguiD - Java GUI for DOS and compatible
JaguiD is a Java GUI for DOS. It consists of several sub-projects including a Java Compiler, a Class Runner and a Jar Packager. JaguiD has limited Java support to provide a Graphical User Interface for DOS and compatibles.1 weekly downloads
MS-DOSCORE is a program for fans of noise (sound and visual).1 weekly downloads
it is basicly an on screen two octive keyboard that you click with mouse support it comes out pc speaker and the buttons are labeled ABCDEFGABCDEFG as far as i know it works in real dos and windows press control key to exit1 weekly downloads
This is a project intended to continue the qfg series. Unfortunately it is a text based game.


text:
En route to Cloudripper
|[ Sizes: Orig | Large | Med | Small | Thumb ]
My son and daughter above upper Chocolate Lake and with Chocolate Peak in the back. August 18, 2008.
Rate This Image
Current Score: 73.06%
Log In To Vote
[ View 3 Votes | Post Comment ]
Cloudripper (Mountain/Rock)
Augie Medina's Image Gallery
Skirting the Volcano's Edge or Acceptable Challenge? Our Family Experience on Cloudripper and Hurd Peak (Article)
Image Data
Image ID: 436191
Hits: 1177
Object Title: En route to Cloudripper
Image Type(s): Scenery


text:
Book Discussion on The War Behind Me
Deborah Nelson talked about The War Behind Me: Inside the Army's Secret Archive of Investigations (Basic Books; November 3, 2008).… read more
Deborah Nelson talked about The War Behind Me: Inside the Army's Secret Archive of Investigations (Basic Books; November 3, 2008). She offers a personal perspective of the Vietnam war through interviews with Vietnam veterans about their experiences. Interwoven with the interviews are results of internal military investigations that provide insight into previously undisclosed facts about the actions of U.S. soldiers in Vietnam. She responded to audience members questions following her remarks.
Deborah Nelson won the Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting in 1997. She is currently the Carnegie Visiting Professor at the University of Maryland College of Journalism and was previously an investigative reporter at the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Seattle Times, and the Chicago Sun-Times. close
People in this video
- Deborah Nelson Author
Hosting Organization
Related Video
Book Discussion on Angel of Dien Bien Phu
Genevieve de Galard recounts her time as a flight nurse for the French Air Force and the aid she provided for many who…
Bucknell University Commencement Address
Erik Weihenmayer, mountain climber and filmmaker, gave the commencement address at Bucknell University.
Book Discussion on Surviving Twice: Amerasian Children of the Vietnam War
Trin Yarborough talked about her book, Surviving Twice: Amerasian Children of the Vietnam War, published by Potomac…
Book Discussion on Vietnam at Peace and Agent Orange
Philip Jones Griffiths talked about the photographs he has taken in Vietnam since the end of the…


text:
The sandwich shop has four main menu items (burger, cheesesteak, banh mi and falafel), plus a rotating special. The banh mi would be my recommendation. It's not a traditional version - the grilled pork or pate has been replaced by meatballs, and a crusty baguette is instead an enormous ciabatta roll at this food truck. But the flavors are representative of a more classic interpretation. There's the tang of pickled carrots, heat from Sriracha mayo and bright sprigs of cilantro that marry well with the pork meatballs. The only blemish on this sandwich may be the ciabatta roll. It's a fine bread, but the size of it dwarfs the delicate harmony of the ingredients within. The homemade potato chips, the crispy ones, are well-done.
With chips and a soda, a sandwich (which is big enough to split) will run you $8. There are four communal picnic tables on a small rock-lined spot between Pigwich and the Local Pig - a patio just big enough for you to embrace some pork.
Showing 1-6 of 6


text:
There's a horse I want to look at but he is located an hour and a half away. I don't have my own trailer so I would likely have to pay to have him hauled here. He does everything I want but I don't want to go look if that is too far.
So how far away do you look? And do you have your own trailer?
Posted via Mobile Device


text:
The National Institute of Standards and Technology's draft cybersecurity framework is a stepping stone toward an October deadline for a preliminary plan -- and ultimately to a "final" document due in February 2014 under President Barack Obama's cyber executive order.
To get there, NIST continues to depend on industry and the public's involvement in creating comprehensive guidelines that are adoptable and effective. The new draft, released Aug. 28, comes just weeks ahead of NIST's fourth workshop, to be held in Dallas Sept. 11-13.
It is a pattern NIST has come to rely on in the creation of the cyber framework, said Adam Sedgewick, NIST senior IT policy advisor. The agency releases information asking for feedback, presents the feedback at a public workshop to launch discussion of key issues, then posts online the information from the workshop discussions that help inform the next iteration of a draft framework.
"We've structured the whole 240 days [given in the executive order to issue the October draft] to try to maximize the amount of public engagement and feedback we could get," Sedgewick said. "Given the time constraints, we've used a combination of public workshops and engagements. We have people engage through our cyber framework website, and at the tail end we'll have another public comment period."
Through the process, NIST officials have been able to present the most comprehensive draft framework yet -- one that fleshes out the core of the guidance and proposed metrics for assessing an organization's cybersecurity standings, for example. The Aug. 28 version builds on a more skeletal iteration from July, and the forthcoming versions will continue that pattern of building on each other using feedback from stakeholders.
"The process lets us see the gap areas and common themes," Sedgewick said. "Are we reflecting the comments right, and is this the right path?"
Between now and October, architects of the framework hope to have discussions about a range of key issues, including:
"We hope to really begin validating this document so we can continue to improve it with time. The Dallas workshop will help to get that information and feedback that we feel is critical to making this a successful approach," Sedgewick said. He added that those who cannot make it to Dallas can submit comments via e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.com, and that once the October preliminary framework is out there will be a formal comment period posted in the Federal Register.
But don't expect any downtime between October and the due date in February. Dialogue will be ongoing, Sedgewick said, and even though the "final" version of the framework is due in February, it will still continue to evolve beyond then.
"After October we're going to continue to kick this higher. We're coming to the stage where we're looking at implementation and we get to see what it looks like when it's put into practice," he said. "We don't see February as the end. We see February as another step in the process and we will continue to work with other agencies on other pieces of the executive order."
About the Author
Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.
E-Mail this page
Printable Format
Advanced Search
Check out the digital edition of FCW magazine -- the federal IT community's premier publication.
In this issue: Tony Scott's busy year ahead, Rising Star profiles and more.
See the latest issue
DHS pulled a two-year-old solicitation for administrative support for cyber mission offices.
The president put the federal government's portfolio of aging IT systems front and center in his final budget request to Congress.
The Obama administration's proposed Cybersecurity National Action Plan for FY2017 includes $3.1B for IT modernization and a new federal chief information security officer.
Looking for success stories and exceptional change in federal IT? Meet the women and men who are making it happen.
In a new survey, federal leaders say they're making digital progress, but most also say they're merely updating old systems, not reinventing processes for the Digital Age.
The U.S. Customs and Immigration Services created new deputy CIO slot to help balance everyday IT operations and burgeoning DevOps, agile and cloud activities.
NIST is looking to increase trust in the technical underpinnings of encryption, by strengthening cryptographic random bit generators.
Steve Kelman applauds ASI Government for sharing valuable knowledge -- and notes that there are still plenty of other questions to answer.
In an op-ed for Business Insider, the GOP presidential candidate called for "the federal government must put its own house in order, prioritizing to reflect the urgency and importance of protecting key databases and communications."
First; I have not been to a NIST workshop in quite some time. I have been to many other government Cybersecurity workshops and have been an Information Assurance Manager for while. It seems that for the most part the concepts are pretty good; not perfect but definately comprehensive as a collective. The one thing I see constantly is that the interpretation and implementation of what is considered to be a "Standard" is different across agency and industry. To top it off the regulations and laws allow for such intepretations. Understandale that no one system is the same. However operating in an environment where the only thing that is the same is that everyone is different, does not really work when attempting to implement standards.
To the commenter who said: "You can participate and help develop a good product, or you can whine." You apparently weren't at cyberworkshops, so you're in no position to accuse anyone else of not participating, especially those of us who actually have participated and contributed. Applying resources and wasting time to "developing good product" based on a fundamentally flawed concept will not lead to success. That was very clear from the industry comments at the two workshops. The other important point that the commenter and NIST are conveniently ignoring is that the federal government has been enacting standards, guidelines, and best practices since 1981 starting with NSA-developed DoD instructions. While you may think that the government's standards approach has been "pretty good", the results say otherwise. The outcome of the government's standards-based approach has been to spend billions of dollars over decades on compliance with this or that standard, all resulting in networks and systems that are inherently insecure and exploited on a daily basis. And that's in the Federal "enterprise" where the government has regulatory, budgetary, and governance authority from the top down, yet it's still not effective. The standards approach will be even more innective when applied to commercial industry where you have no governance authority or budget control, and you've already decided that the government won't use it's regulatory authority. The real agenda, which the commenter would know if they had actually attended the workshops or put any thought into this, is that the "voluntary" model is expected to fail. The government is giving that model a shot, knowing that it will fail, to clear the way for regulatory mandates. So what the government is really telling industry is to follow our proven-failed model that will cost you a lot of money while producing few if any security improvement, and then we'll apply more regulation and cost you more money.
Most people (companies) will do the "right thing", if they know what it is. I've been using NIST IT and cyber giudance and documentation for 2+ decades. It has been very helpful/useful. When 800-53 was started lots of folks thought there was no way it could work. It took time (and particpation) but it's pretty good, now. You can participate and help develop a good product, or you can whine.
I attended the cyber framework workshops and believe that NIST was not effective at capturing and communicating key conclusions about the framework. Some of the more important and challenging comments from the working sessions were: 1) Many critical infrastructure companies are international. Any new standards applied to these companies by the Federal Government will not be accepted or trusted by partners and subsidiaries in foreign countries, leading to expensive fragmentation and non-interoperability across international CI providers. 2) The idea of liability protection for commercial critical infrastructure providers who "comply" with the new standards fundamentally undermines risk management and leads to a model where companies achieve compliance, but not actual security (two very different things). 3) The lifecycle for critical infrastructure systems can be 15 years or more and thse CI providers have an almost insurmountable challenge dealing with legacy systems where "security" cannot be retro-fitted systems that tend to be highly specialized or purpose built. It's the same problem that Federal agencies faced when trying to secure or "accredit" systems that were implemented years ago. It leads to a process that produces paper compliance, but few signficant or adequate improvements in actual security. 4) How are new "voluntary" standards that intend to impose minimal, if any, regulatory burden going to affect real change? 5) The CI industry is so diverse and each vertical's security challenges are sufficiently unique that virtually no standard, no matter how flexible and tailorable, will apply across CI verticals.
8609 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 500Vienna, VA 22182-2215 703-876-5100
© 1996-2013 1105 Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, visit: www.1105Reprints.com


text:
Solicitation for prostitution, often referred to simply as solicitation, is considered a sex crime in most states and involves the act of asking for or encouraging the exchange of sexual services for money. The penalties associated with solicitation charges vary from state-to-state some states prosecute solicitation vigorously and may potentially include jail time, mandatory registration as a sex offender, community service, and more.
A sex crime conviction almost always has devastating lifelong social and legal consequences for the accused. If you've been charged with solicitation or related crime, you need an aggressive and proven criminal defense attorney on your side. Please contact a criminal lawyer at Imhoff & Associates today for a FREE case evaluation.
Solicitation Defense
Sting operations conducted by law enforcement agencies are not uncommon and are, in fact, notorious for ensnaring innocent people. Unfortunately, solicitation is one of those crimes where many accused individuals have no prior criminal history and are just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
At Imhoff & Associates, we are committed to protecting the rights of the accused and making sure they receive fair and just treatment throughout the entire process. We understand that cases involving solicitation and related sex crimes such as prostitution and pandering are especially serious and strive to ensure our clients receive the highest quality legal defense.
When determining a defense strategy, we begin by thoroughly examining all the evidence and circumstances of your arrest. Once we have all the facts, we can work on building an individualized defense for your case. Possible defense strategies may be based on:
- Mistaken identity
- Entrapment
- Factual innocence
- Insufficient evidence
- More
Accused of Solicitation?
Don't wait to seek legal help. You may face severe punishments ranging from jail time to loss of certain rights, heavy fines, mandatory rehabilitation, and more. Let us help you. Please contact a solicitation defense attorney today for a FREE consultation with a skilled and experienced criminal defense attorney who can evaluate your case and help you determine a course of action to obtain the best possible outcome.
Sex Crime Articles written by Imhoff & Associates, P.C. Criminal Defense Attorneys
- FALSE RAPE ALLEGATIONS How False Rape Allegations Hurt both Innocent Men and Victimized Women
- STATUTORY RAPE Sorting out the California Sexual Intercourse Law
- BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SURF FOR Online Undercover Operations to Trap Child Predators
- STATUTORY RAPE Reporting Myths and Facts
- SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION Solicitation, Prostitution, Pimping & Pandering
- FALSE CHILD ABUSE ALLEGATIONS Custody Battles
- FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF CHILD MOLESTATION AND CHILD ABUSE What is Real and what only Appears to be Real, and How to Know the Difference.
- THE PROBLEM OF FALSE CONFESSIONS True Lies or False Truths?
- NEW YORK: Can a Convicted Sex Offender Expunge a Sex Offense Conviction?


text:
STARmeterSEE RANK
Up 313,680 this week
Yves Lecoq
Yves Lecoq was born on May 4, 1946 in Paris, France. He is an actor, known for Les grands du rire (2005), Tout le monde il est gentil (1989) and Flashback (1995). See full bio »
Born:in Paris, France
More at IMDbPro » Contact Info: View agent
Represent Yves Lecoq? Add or change photos


text:
Brendan Barber
Brendan Barber is the TUC general secretary.
Brendan Barber was born on 3 April 1951 in Southport, Lancashire. He was educated at St Mary's College, a grammar school in Crosby and spent a 'gap year' with Voluntary Service Overseas teaching in the Volta Region of Ghana before going on to the City University in London where he gained a BA Hons in social sciences.
After graduating, Brendan took a sabbatical year as President of the City University Students Union where, among other things, he was involved in negotiations with the Greater London Council to acquire cheap housing for students near the university campus.
His first job, after university, in 1974, was as a researcher for the Ceramics, Glass and Mineral Products Industry Training Board, based in Harrow. A year later, in 1975, he joined the TUC as a policy officer dealing with training issues and in 1976 was promoted to the post of assistant secretary in the Organisation and Industrial Relations Department.
In April 1979, shortly before the general election that saw the defeat of the Labour Government, he became head of the TUC Press and Information Department. Over the next eight years Brendan dealt with the TUC media relations at a time when union stories often dominated the news agenda, from the Stockport Messenger dispute of 1982, to the Miners Strike of 1984-85 and the Wapping Dispute. He was also closely involved in international stories relating to the TUC's dealings with unions in places from Poland and the rise of Solidarity, to South Africa where the trade unions played a prominent part in the overthrow of apartheid.
In 1987 he returned to the Organisation and Industrial Relations Department as head of department. Here his responsibilities included dealing with inter-union relations, employment law and training policy. In 1993, following John Monks election as general secretary, Brendan became deputy general secretary.
Brendan became General Secretary in June 2003. He was a driving force in the United Against Racism campaign. He has also played a prominent role in the establishment of the TUC Organising Academy - training organisers to help unions boost membership, and the Partnership Institute, whose aim is to promote partnership style relations between employers and unions.
Recently he has helped establish new negotiating machinery in the university sector and worked hard to build better relations between all the unions in the schools sector. He has worked closely with John Monks in the area of government relations.
Brendan Barber is a Non-Executive Director of the Court of the Bank of England. He was a member of the ACAS Council from 1995 until May 2004. He was also a member of Sport England from 1999 until 2003.
He lives in Muswell Hill, north London with his wife Mary, whom he met when she worked in the TUC International Department, and his daughters, Amy and Sarah. Brendan is an avid supporter of Everton Football Club, though he also occasionally attends the home games of Vauxhall Conference side Barnet. He is also a keen golfer.


text:
April 4, 2013
Each tour has its own features and elements to further depict the Shaker site.
Stories this photo appears in:
18th century, meet 21st century
Shaker history comes alive through virtual reality project in Watervliet
The Shaker Heritage Society is sharing the Shakers with the modern world by creating Virtual Watervliet (VWV), a digital reconstruction of their historic settlement.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.


text:
Ski resorts Asia
Best rating:
2 out of 5 stars
Evaluated by Skiresort.info, the world's largest evaluation and test portal for ski resorts.
Click here for rating process info
Skiresort.info shows the après-ski huts, umbrella bars, bars (incl. après-ski photos) and après-ski parties in Asia.
There are nice restaurants with a view of the slopes in the Mall of the Emirates. However, this can... more
The practice of Après-Ski is unheard of here.more
Après Ski is unheard of in Doha.more
Après-Ski is unheard of in Al Ain. No alcohol is served in the entire Bawadi Mall.more
No alcohol is served in the Sky Resort so there is no bar on the slopes or at the Base Lodge.... more