text:
Doreen L Seamon Attorney specializes in providing asset protection, veterans benefits, medicaid, estate p... more
Samuel Spencer Stone Attorney at law, JD, CPA, CLU, ChFC is a arbitrator/mediator/fact finder. more
Our law firm concentrates in the area of family law throughout North Central W. Va. Incl. divorce, child ... more
Displaying 1-14 of 14 results
Page 1 of 1
Top Trending Articles
Love Horoscopes for Autumn
Will you find love this Holiday season? Read ... more
How to Pick the Best Car Seat for Your Child
You want to keep your child safe, and purchasing the ri... more
How to Stop Your Dog From Barking Excessively
If your dog barks at anything and everything, you'll be... more
How to Make Ricotta-Basil Stuffed Tomatoes
Add some variety to your vegetarian diet! Keep reading ... more
How to Make Mushroom and Broccoli Vegetarian ...
Everyone loves pizza! Learn how to make this delicious ... more
© 2015 Local Corporation - US Patent 7,231,405
Some data provided by Acxiom. Questions and Comments?


text:
November 30, 2015
Residents of Grand Forks, North Dakota are dealing with frigid temperatures after a blizzard swept through the area on Saturday (12-28) and brought fierce winds, ice, and temperatures below zero.
The blizzard was a return to the bitter cold after Friday's (12-27) short stint in the 30s. Authorities posted travel advisories on several highways in Grand Forks on Saturday- warning drivers of the dangerous driving conditions as the wind and snow created a haze that covered the area.
On Sunday (12-29),the sun came out, the wind speed diminshed to between five and fifteen miles per hour and temperatures reached a high of -11 degrees. Forecasters say the cold weather will continue through the end of the year, but temperatures are expected to rise above zero on New Years' Day.
Click Here to access the online Public Inspection File
Viewers with disabilities can get assistance accessing this station's FCC Public Inspection File by contacting the station with the information listed below. Questions or concerns relating to the accessibility of the FCC's online public file system should be directed to the FCC at 888-225-5322, 888-835-5322 (TTY), or email@example.com.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Well, thank you so much, for the nice welcome, and everything :)
I do believe so c:
Why thank you :)
Thank you kindly!
It's pretty darn awesome, I still haven't had the time to fully look around and meet everybody, but so far it's amazing! Is there anything you recommend I should do first? :D
lol well then I'm glad to have amused you.
Hey Danno! Thanks! :D
Hey, thanks for the welcome! And as for the band aids . . . yeah, not the best but it was two in the morning and my brain wasn't really functioning so for now it works.
Also, one of my good friends lived in Clinton until 5th grade!
I've been reading John Green/watching vlogbrothers for years and had no idea this existed. So cool! :)
thanks Danno! It's going to be fun talking to other nerdfighters!
Thanks for the welcome :)
Thanks a lot Danno!
thanks! I am super excited about joining
Heya! Thanks for the welcome, I'm glad to be here!
Thank you! Glad to be here ^.^
Thank you! I'm very excited to be a Nerdfighter!
Sadly yes :/ I have quite a few projects to be done.
© 2015 Created by Hank Green. Powered by


text:
If I add a caption to an image, it does not show in the post. For example, this page has a picture of an Australian Cockroach on it, but it won't show.
The code used is:
[caption id="attachment_1915" align="alignright" width="257" caption="Australian Rach"]<img class="size-medium wp-image-1915" title="australian roach" src="http://allsafe.mypestprevention.com/files/2011/10/Australian_cockroach-257x3003.jpg" alt="australian roach" width="257" height="300" />[/caption]
I have .caption, .wp-caption and .alignright defined in my stylesheet. Ideas?


text:
Starship Size Argument thread
View Single Post
May 5 2013, 07:04 AM
Rear Admiral
Re: Starship Size Argument thread
greenlight wrote:
(actually, the real scandal is that they put bar-code scanners on the bridge stations, but I seem to be the only one outraged by that, so I'm going with the size issue)
You're probably joking about that, but to me the barcode scanners are a helluva lot worse than the carpet foam inside the elevators in the TOS movies. In fact, I think I put them about on par with something I remember from THE FANTASTIC JOURNEY when I was a teenager, and saw them using the TV remote control -- Zenith's Space Command 600 -- that I had in my hand, but they were chromakeying some kind of energy beam out of it as a weapon. I was going to include a reference to Sulu's stickshift in TMP, but I just remembered they have the same or worse in the Abrams, so I guess those are a push.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by trevanian


text:
Join our efforts to clean up dirty coal.
When natural gas and oil are extracted, methane -- a potent greenhouse gas -- leaks into the atmosphere from the wells, compressors, pipes and other infrastructure. Tell EPA to regulate methane now!
2014 Austin PSR Board Meeting
May, 18, 2014
All members are welcome
Please RSVP for additional details and directions


text:
Originally Posted by ic-racer
I spend a few minutes looking for John's schedule in a prior post. Here it is Post #118 for those that may have missed it or need the information: http://www.apug.org/forums/viewpost.php?p=1339950
We will have to make a table of contents next time with an index at the end.
"If you want to be famous, you must do something more badly than anybody in the entire world." Miroslav Tichý


text:
2014 Angel Tree Project
Johnston County Angel Tree Project
The Angel Tree is the program for gifts for our Foster children and Adolescent parenting program children.
For additional information please contact:
Tony Harris, Foster Care Licensing Supervisor, at 919-631-3833 or email him at: firstname.lastname@example.com
Angel Tree Sites listed (below) are participants of the Angel Tree Project 2014
Automatic Rolls of North Carolina: 68 Harvest Mill Lane, Clayton, NC 27520
Bistro on Third: 146 S. Third Street, Smithfield, NC 27577
Cary Academy: 1500 North Harrison Ave., Cary, NC 27513
Cracker Barrel: 1109 Industrial Park Drive, Smithfield, NC 27577
Gandolfo's: 224 E. Market Street , Smithfield, NC 27577
Grifols Therapeutics Inc.: 8368 US Hwy 70 Bus West, Clayton, NC 27520
Industrial Body Works, 505 S. Brightleaf Blvd., Smithfield, NC 27577
Johnston County Courthouse (County Manager's Office): 207 E. Johnston Street, Smithfield, NC 27577
Johnston County Teacher Assistants Association
Johnston UNC Health Care: Smithfield and Clayton locations
KS Bank: 115 West Anderson Street, Selma, NC 27576
Morgan's Gymnastics Academy: 208 Computer Drive, Smithfield, NC 27577
Novo Nordisk: 3612 Powhatan Road, Clayton, NC 27520
Smithfield Recreation and Aquatics Center: 600 Booker Dairy Road, Smithfield, NC 27577
Starbucks: 13024 US 70 West, Clayton, NC 27520
Sysco Raleigh, LLC: 1032 Baugh Road, Selma, NC 27576
Wake Medical Center of Raleigh, NC
Walmart of Smithfield: 1299 N. Brightleaf Blvd. , Smithfield, NC 27577
Walmart of Clayton: 12873 Hwy 70 West, Clayton, NC 27520
|© 2015 Johnston County Government


text:
Come to Chaba Spa Cherngtalay and enjoy natural surroundings and tranquil atmosphere amongst botanic garden overlooking a lagoon view.
All of our massage rooms are located in excellent locations where our guests can experience the spectacular view of the fresh water lagoon while relaxing with our massage. Our fully equipped massage rooms give every clients best privacy and relaxation.
To find us, just follow the signs for Phuket Laguna, after passing through the Laguna entrance, pass Bake on the right and then you will see a large sign, pointing left for the Chaba Spa, turn left into Soi Cherngtlay 6 and Chaba Spa is about 200 metres up the road on the left hand side.
Or drive into the Boat Avenue Mall in Cherngtalay, follow the road until the end (about 1 minute drive) until you come to a T junction. Turn right and Chaba Spa is a few metres on the right.
Alternatively if you have no form of transport phone the spa and they will arrange for a car to pick you up from your hotel. This service is available for hotels in Laguna and surrounding areas.
Editor's Comment
Located near the entrance to Laguna Phuket, the Chaba Spa enjoys a tranquil setting beside a large lagoon with relaxing lagoon-view treatment rooms. The spa offers a wide range of eastern and western massages, including Thai, Swedish, aroma and Indian body and head massages. Rejuvenating treatments are also available such as hand and foot paraffin or collagen, manicures and pedicures, body wraps and scrubs. Contact Chaba Spa to make an appointment and they will arrange pick-up from your hotel.
Professional and well run. Loved being massaged while being able to look out on a small lake. Rooms are private and come with shower rooms, so had no problems with noise. afterwards they provided a drink in the lobby area. Much cheaper than my hotel, but more expensive than local massage shops, worth paying a bit more fpr something really nice and relaxing.
My first time trying this spa, their Thai style herbal body scrub, steam and compress, and traditional thai massage were great and I paid around 100usd for this whatever package. Many friends said there are many other choices down the street with a lot cheaper prices, but I think I like this relaxing lagoon view spa. Very relaxed with their service and the surroundings.
Joann Lee
Amazing atmosphere spa. My favorite oil massage was professionally performed here. Also impressed with the hospitable service from staffs. The surroundings are very relaxing with lake view.
Had a most relaxing time. The private spa rooms all face out and are above a lagoon. It is better value to pick a package than just a one hour massage session.The 3 hour Chaba Anti Stress I picked included a bath, oil and foot massage, cost mif I remember correctly was 3000 baht. I have never known 3 hours to go so quickly.
Been there 3 times now. Really like it and the staff our great. And its very clean.
Its not high end, but the massages and service are as good as I have had even when spending 2 times more.
But the other customers can be a little noisy sometimes.
Get Directions
|At Laguna Phuket Entrance
90/1 Soi Cherngtalay 16, Cherngtalay, Thalang, Phuket 83110 Thailand (Get Directions)
|+66 (0)76 304 541-2
|+66 (0)81 797 9235
|[email protected]


text:
Prices and availability are subject to change from the time and date that you print this page.
11/27/2015 10:35:44 AM. For Customer Service, please call 800.933.9904
Featuring the word "Dream" this appliquéd pillow is the best way to welcome bedtime.
Pink Dream Throw Pillow
Includes Cover and Insert 16"Wx12"H
Details, details
- Nod exclusive
- Soft cotton pillow covers with appliquéd "Dream" or "Hello"
- Available as a set or as pillow covers
- Imported
Show 'em what you're made of
- Shell: 100% cotton; Appliqué: 100% polyester
- Throw Pillow Insert: Shell is 100% cotton; Fill is 95% feather, 5% down
Care instructions
- Dry clean only
Extras! Extras!
- Coordinates with our Ribbon Rose Bedding
At The Land of Nod, nothing is more important to us than providing safe, high-quality products to you and your family. We believe that kids' products should be able to handle everything kids throw their way (literally and figuratively). That's why all of our products have an 18-year quality guarantee. And, hopefully, your kids will no longer be sleeping in bunk beds by then.
Who's there?
Joan who?
Joan call us, we'll call you!
Hello Throw Pillow
Our Designers Recommend
Rose Ribbon Bedding Free Shipping$28.80 - $175.20reg. $36.00 - $219.00
Lace Pillow (Pink) Free Shipping$16.00 - $27.20reg. $20.00 - $34.00More Colors Available
Charming Baskets (Silver Stripe) Free Shipping$39.20 - $71.20reg. $49.00 - $89.00
Anchor Girl Pillow Free Shipping$19.20reg. $24.00
Ribbon Cutting Rug (Grey) Free Shipping$55.20 - $183.20reg. $69.00 - $229.00More Colors Available
Customers Also Viewed
I Think I Canvas Cube Canvas Bin (Pink) Free Shipping$7.96reg. $9.95
'A' Typeset Throw Pillow Free Shipping$19.20reg. $24.00
Bonjour Throw Pillow (Pink) Free Shipping$15.20reg. $19.00More Colors Available
New!Nod Doll Pram Free Shipping$55.20reg. $69.00
Mythical Edition Plush Unicorn (White) Free Shipping$10.36reg. $12.95More Colors Available
New!Frontier Cap & Walking Stick Free Shipping$39.20reg. $49.00
District 3-Cube Storage Frame (Wheat) Free Shipping$159.20reg. $199.00More Colors Available
Star Pillow Free Shipping$19.20reg. $24.00
A Teepee & Cushion to Call Your Own Set... Free Shipping$159.20reg. $199.00More Colors Available
Eenie, Meenie, Miney, Mini Cooking Set Free Shipping$19.96reg. $24.95
To the Moon Playhouse Canopy Free Shipping$151.20reg. $189.00
Now You See It Acrylic Book Cart $199.20reg. $249.00


text:
BOSTON � For his 31st birthday, Dustin Pedroia got the flu.
Symptoms that first arose on Saturday night proved too much even for Pedroia on Sunday. He made an appearance at Fenway Park in order to have antibiotics administered by team doctors, but he was not available to play. Brock Holt was in the Red Sox lineup at second base in his place.
�Hopefully this is a short-lived situation,� Boston manager John Farrell said.
At 31, Pedroia is the third-oldest Red Sox player to have appeared in at least 80 games this season � trailing only David Ortiz (38) and Mike Napoli (32). A career that began with American League Rookie of the Year honors in 2007 now has lasted more than 1,100 games and more than 5,000 plate appearances, the latter a plateau he reached in late July.
Only 10 players since World War II have more plate appearances in a Red Sox uniform than Pedroia�s 5,084. Next on the list ahead of him is Mike Greenwell (5,166), who he�ll pass by the end of this season if he stays healthy.
Twitter: @brianmacp
Location, ST | website.com


text:
Local briefs for June 13, 2008
Published: Friday, June 13, 2008 at 6:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Friday, June 13, 2008 at 5:37 a.m.
Florida's Blood Centers offering $10 gas card
Florida's Blood Centers, located at 1051 S.W. First Ave., is the sole provider of blood to hospitals in Marion County.
Through the month of June, the branch is offering an incentive where each blood donor who donates at the branch office will receive a $10 BP gas card and free food from the Primary Oven and Bruster's Ice Cream.
Also, each donor at blood mobiles and the branch will be entered to win a 32-inch LCD HDTV donated by DeLuca Toyota; these donors also receive Lake Diamond buy-one get-one greens fees.
For more information, call 732-0175.
Appleton offering Black Music Month events
In recognition of Black Music Month, the Appleton Museum of Art, 4333 E. Silver Springs Blvd., will host the following events:
"The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman" at 1:30 p.m. Sunday (movie).
"Porgy and Bess," acts I and II at 1:30 p.m. June 22 (video).
"Porgy and Bess," act III, at 1:30 p.m. June 20 (video).
For more information, call 291-4455.
Interfaith schedules its next forum for Tuesday
The Marion County chapter of The Interfaith Alliance of Florida will hold its next forum, "Women in Religion Today," at 7 p.m. Tuesday, at St. Matthew's Lutheran Church, 3453 E Silver Springs Blvd. Call 854-5907.
County Commissioners to meet on Tuesday
The Marion County Board of County Commissioners will meet at 9 a.m.
Tuesday at the Marion County Commissioners' Auditorium, McPherson Governmental Complex, 601 S.E. 25th Ave. Meetings are open to the public. Call 438-2323.
Code Enforcement Board schedule meeting
Members of the Code Enforcement Board will meet at 9 a.m. Wednesday at the County Commission Auditorium, McPherson Governmental Complex, 601 S.E. 25th Ave. Meetings are open to the public. For more information, call 671-8902.
Rainbow Lakes Estate board to hold meeting
The Rainbow Lakes Estate Advisory Board will meet at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday at the District Office, 4000 S.W. Deepwater Court. Meetings are open to the public. For more information, call 489-4280.
Meeting scheduled for County Parks council
The Marion County Parks and Recreation Advisory Council will meet at 3 p.m. Wednesday in the Parks and Recreation Conference Room, McPherson Government Complex, 111 S.E. 25th Ave. Meetings are open to the public. For more information, call 671-8560.
Administrative Pros to hold dinner meeting
The dinner meeting of the Ocala Chapter of the International Association of Administrative Professionals begins at 6 p.m. Monday at the city of Ocala Engineering Department, 405 S.E. Osceola Ave. For more information, call Julia Jerolaman at 291-2100.
Meeting set for Latino Business Network
The Florida Latino Business Network will hold its monthly meeting from 6 to 8 p.m. Tuesday at Mango's, 20 S.W. Broadway St. Dinner and refreshments purchased at attendees' discretion. For more information, call 425-6421.
Reader comments posted to this article may be published in our print edition. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.
Comments are currently unavailable on this article


text:
Advanced Search
Hot Search
If you already have an account,sign in.
Car Camcorders are cameras with DVR recording function for car and vehicle security. We call it "Car Camera DVR" as well. Most camcorders have LCD screen inbuilt, just like a complete car surveillance system.
Add To Cart
Pre-Order Now
Choose Options


text:
It's hard to know if everything one reads is true, but what is undeniable is that we now have an acknowledgement by a National Government of the protocols for dealing with on of the worlds most venerable cryptids, known by many names but most familiar as Yeti.
These protocols may give a clue as to why no hard physical evidence of these creatures has be found— namely, that the killing of such creatures, widely regarded to be sentient, is strictly forbidden. (However, as anyone who has spent some time researching these hominid cryptids will know, the likelihood of a human actually being able to locate, much less track such a being, perfectly designed to blend into to their environment and with all the intelligence of a human, in highly improbable.)
Conspiracy theorists will take note of Regulation 3, which states that any information bringing light to the existence of such creatures must first be brought to the Nepalese Government. While most western government would surely allow such information to be made public, and quickly look to exploit such creatures for financial gain, in a Buddhist country such as Nepal, it is definitely possible that such information would be suppressed for the the benefit and protection of such beings. (For a contemporary parallel, one can look at the Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary in Bhutan, which was created in part to protect Yetis.)


text:
Materials List
(fabric width 44") BASIC TOTE 2/3 yard fabric 2/3 yard lining 3 yards cotton belt webbing thread DETAILED TOTE 2/3 yard fabric (tote) 2/3 yard fabric (outside pocket) 2/3 yard fabric (lining) 3 yards cotton belt webbing 1 large button thread OPTIONAL 2/3 yard interlining (thin cotton batting) 1/3 yard fabric (optional fabric handles)
Suitable Fabrics
We used cottons for our samples. (Rowan Fabrics– Joel Dewberry and organic cotton and organic cotton/hemp blend.) Linen, and other medium weight fabrics that wash and wear well would be suitable.
- US Warranty 30 days replacement if defective.
- Non-US Warranty: 30 days parts and labor


text:
- Find a rental
- Manage your booking
- Tamarindo rentals
- Last Minute Tamarindo Rentals
- Tamarindo Rentals with Pool
- Kid Friendly Tamarindo Rentals
- Waterfront Tamarindo Rentals
- 5-Star Tamarindo Rentals
- 2 Bedroom Tamarindo Rentals
- Tamarindo Beach Rentals
- 3 Bedroom Tamarindo Rentals
- Tamarindo Mountain View Rentals
- Tamarindo Rentals with Hot Tub
- 4 Bedroom Tamarindo Rentals
- Cheap Tamarindo Rentals
- Luxury Tamarindo Rentals
- Pet Friendly Tamarindo Rentals
- See more rentals
- How to book
- Help Center
- Write a review
Luxurious Beach Club Penthouse
From $380 / night
balance due
Description from the owner
Description from the owner
Bedrooms: 3/
Bathrooms: 4/
Sleeps: 8/
Type: Apt. / Condo
Our 3,000 square Penthouse sits on the third floor of the Ibis at the Beach condominium. This is a 10 unit boutique condo at the heart of Tamarindo Preserve. It is located within 40 yards of the Langosta Beach Club at which you will have full membership privileges during your stay. The club is built on the nicest beach in the area and includes an infinity edge pool overlooking the warm Pacific, a full gym, exercise and dance studio, private cabanas, a tropical French restaurant, pool and ocean side bar and complete concierge service.
The home is a study in excellence and attention to detail. You will immediately be struck by the travertine limestone ...Read more
About the owner
About the owner
Bob Wilson
Bob Wilson
- Response rate: 95%
- Response time: A few hours
- Calendar updated: 2 days ago
Overall rating:
Additional Location Information
Located in the heart of Tamarindo Preserve and 40 yards from the Langosta Beach Club and the nicest beach in the area. It is only a 45 minute drive from Liberia International Airport.
More About This Location
Beach or lakeside relaxation
Show rates details
Also consider
- FlipKey has rentals in over 11,000 destinations around the world:
- Destin vacation rentals - 2,406 rentals from $99/night
- Myrtle Beach vacation rentals - 1,966 rentals from $34/night
- Panama City Beach vacation rentals - 2,600 rentals from $85/night
- Ocean City vacation rentals - 779 rentals from $80/night
- Gulf Shores vacation rentals - 1,301 rentals from $80/night


text:
Leaf Clean Energy Co (LEAF) - Final Results RNS Number : 9397Q Leaf Clean Energy Company 13 November 2012 13 November 2012 Leaf Clean Energy Company Results for the year ended 30 June 2012 The Board of Leaf Clean Energy Company ("Leaf" or "the Company") are pleased to announce the Company's results for the year ended 30 June 2012. Highlights of the year are: · NAV per share for the Leaf portfolio was 141.22 cents or 90.03 pence at US$1.5685 to the £1 (2011: 165.60 cents). · Leaf made an additional US$7.6 million of direct equity and debt investments into existing portfolio businesses. · The Company received cash payments of accrued and current interest and repayments of principal on loans to its investee companies totalling US$5.1 million and US$15.5 million respectively. · The Company earned US$1.8 million of interest income from debt investments in the portfolio companies. This income has been recorded in the intermediate holding companies and included in the assessment of valuations for the relevant subsidiaries. · The Company repurchased 3.9 million shares at an average price of 77.98 pence, taking advantage of weakness in the Company's share price to deliver value to shareholders. For further information, please contact: Bran Keogh +1-202-289-7881 Leaf Clean Energy Company Ivonne Cantu +44 (0) 207 397 8900 Cenkos Securities plc Chairman's Statement I am pleased to report on the progress made by Leaf Clean Energy Company ("Leaf" or the "Company") for the year ended 30 June 2012. Three years ago we made three key structural changes to deal with the impact on the private equity market of a global contraction, which continues to hamper a return to the targeted gains we came to expect during the mid-2000s: · We replaced our asset advisor with experienced professionals who could partner with our portfolio company management teams to help them navigate toward growth; we also replaced the operational teams in several of our active investments with more experienced asset managers and O&M operators; · We employed rigorous methods to identify opportunities in areas where others are not focused, such as companies trading at a steep discount or where experienced management teams are in place and growth equity is needed to scale up proven concepts; and · We assumed the worst and husbanded our resources to ensure that we could ride out a very difficult and sustained downturn. Now the focus of the directors and the Leaf management team is to continue to support our portfolio companies and realise the investments when opportune to maximise returns to our shareholders. Portfolio update Cumulative public market forces and near-term growth concerns in our industry resulted in generally lower valuations, most prominently in the wind and solar PV sub-sectors. We were therefore rigorous in reflecting mark-to-market values in line with relevant investment barometers in the sector. Although our aggregate NAV consequently decreased, the great majority of Leaf's portfolio companies continued to hit their milestones and several delivered on value creation initiatives put in place since our last annual report, reflecting our successful strategy of actively partnering with management. Johnstown Regional Energy, LLC ("JRE") secured long-term contracts to sell its reclaimed landfill gas production to buyers in California, commanding premium prices due to the fuel's green attributes. Leaf's management team and board members worked closely with JRE's operators to put the company in a considerably more favorable economic position while natural gas prices remain low for the foreseeable future. Multitrade Telogia, LLC, one of the company's biomass generation assets, performed above expectations from an operational standpoint, benefiting from the experienced operators and asset managers we had earlier put in place. Evidence of our ability to be rigorous and opportunistic in our acquisition strategy came shortly after the end of the reporting period with our investment in Atlanta-based Lehigh Technologies, Inc. ("Lehigh"). Lehigh's proprietary technology transforms end-of-life tires and post-industrial rubber into new materials that are incorporated into high-performance tires, consumer and industrial plastics goods, asphalt and coatings and construction materials. This investment further diversifies our portfolio and reduces our exposure to natural gas prices and government incentives. Lehigh has a seasoned management team with which we are partnering closely, delivering solid sales to tire manufacturers and operating in a number of other very promising vertical markets. SkyFuel, Inc. ("SkyFuel") is an excellent example of the way in which we are conserving our resources and planning for the long term. During the year SkyFuel sold, shipped and delivered on its first large-scale commercial project with a large European power company. It also became the first company in the concentrated solar power (CSP) industry to offer insurance to support the company's product warranties through a first-of-its-kind performance guarantee from Munich Re, a multinational reinsurance company. As a result of Leaf's successful partnership with management and additional financial support, SkyFuel is now one of the few remaining standalone CSP technology providers, with a strongly growing pipeline. In summary, I am pleased to say that many of the portfolio's operational assets have now been de-risked and optimized for further performance improvements, positioning them for continued growth as our diverse portfolio matures. Economic and political background The past year saw continued global equity market volatility and clean energy sector underperformance. Factors contributing to the volatile investment climate included the lingering European sovereign debt crisis, investment concerns over sustained global growth and mixed economic indicators from two of the world's largest economies, the United States and China. The clean energy sector saw significant challenges over the period, including high-profile solar bankruptcies in North America and Europe and workforce reductions in some of the world's largest wind turbine manufacturers. These events all took place under intense public scrutiny, leading to scepticism amongst media outlets, conservative political leaders and the public at large about the long-term viability of renewables as a supplement to traditional fossil fuels and about the US government's decision to use taxpayer-funded incentives to support a struggling industry. This fallout may continue in the short term, further exacerbating the current trade tensions between China and Western economies, with lasting implications for investors. Despite these political headwinds, the re-election of President Obama and the positive remarks he made during the State of the Union Address in the early part of 2012, as well as his remarks and those of Governor Cuomo and Mayor Bloomberg of New York regarding increased severe weather and its relationship to climate change, assured us that the renewable energy sector will continue to be a growing part of the US's energy future. To date, this has rung true and the next four years may see renewed focus in the sector. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, total installed renewable energy generation capacity in the US grew by 21% over the past year, providing approximately 12% of the nation's energy supply. Furthermore, between the first quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012 US installed capacity from wind and solar power generation increased by 17% and 85% respectively. Key drivers of installed capacity growth have been the Production and Investment Tax Credits (PTC and ITC) and the precipitous decline in costs of key renewable technologies, most notably solar PV and wind. According to the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA), the average price of a solar panel has declined by 47% since the beginning of 2011. Onshore wind costs have fallen by 15% over the same period. These continued cost declines have led to wind and solar PV energy prices coming within striking distance of conventional fossil-fuel alternatives in many parts of the US. However, government support through subsidies or tax credits is expected to be curtailed over the coming years, which undoubtedly reduces the economic incentives for developers of renewable energy sources to construct projects at the current pace. In a separate development, the past year saw natural gas match coal as a primary fuel source for US power generation for the first time since the government started collecting data in 1977. According to the Energy Information Agency (EIA), natural-gas-fired plants provided 33% of US generation, compared to coal's 34% share. In 2009, natural gas accounted for 23% of US generation, while coal provided 45%. This historic shift is largely due to the unprecedented discovery of large shale gas reserves and stricter environmental controls around emissions for the aging coal fleet in the US. Sector performance The public renewable energy market faced significant challenges as governments in the developed economies pared back investment subsidies, consumers enjoyed access to historically low natural gas prices and investor confidence in the broader sector remained depressed. These factors, coupled with the continued challenge of accessing finance for renewable projects, trade tensions between the US and China and negative political sentiment in the US, led to disappointing headline performance for the year relative to other markets. The WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index (NEX), which tracks 96 large clean energy stocks worldwide, has underperformed the S&P 500 by 19% so far this year, hitting a nine-year low in the first quarter of 2012. Global private equity and venture capital renewable energy investment echoed similar trends in 2012, down from a record 2011. Investment in the first half of 2012 fell 16% to $3.6bn from $4.3bn in 2011. Despite this decline in private investment over the past year, large investments continue to reflect the importance and value-creation opportunities of addressing energy and sustainable solutions both domestically and internationally. As the renewable energy industry continues to mature and the weaker players exit the stage, I believe the sector will emerge strengthened as sustainable business models become essential. Outlook Despite the underperformance of the sector over the past year, the large majority of Leaf's portfolio companies are progressing as expected against their business plans. I believe the team's determination and focus have preserved capital in an unstable environment. As the market recovers, the value creation initiatives put in place will position Leaf to deliver significantly improved shareholder value. We believe that the long-term fundamentals of the clean energy sector remain strong and, as private market investors, we believe that valuations for maturing private companies are at an attractive level. The current environment is also conducive to making investments in lean companies that have exhibited strong fundamentals and continued resilience in a challenging environment. Our priorities in the current year are to remain focused on partnering with our portfolio companies to deliver further operational improvements, whilst carefully husbanding our resources. The Annual Report and Accounts set out below incorporate both financial statements for the Company and consolidated financial statements for the wider Leaf Group. References to NAV in my report and the Management Report reflect the Company's NAV. Net assets For the year ended 30 June 2012, Leaf's net asset value (NAV) per share decreased by 14.7 percent, from 165.60 cents to 141.22 cents. Of Leaf's US$182 million of net assets, US$42 million was held in cash. The Board is of the view that this balance provides sufficient liquidity to meet the continuing needs of the portfolio. ^(1) Based on US$/£ exchange rate of 1.5685 on 30 June 2012 MANAGEMENT REPORT During the year ended 30 June 2012 the clean energy investment markets faced continued uncertainty and delays to company realizations, largely due to global economic and political conditions, as described below in the "Market Environment" section. The WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index (NEX) of publicly-quoted renewable energy companies has lost more than 75% of its value since its high point in December 2007, and is down 44% in the year ended 30 June 2012. In the US, abundant and low-cost shale gas has been a game-changer for renewable and non-renewable energy alike, and is a major cause of the significant and sustained collapse in power prices in the US over the past five years, as natural gas is now setting the marginal price of power. Nonetheless, certain sub-sectors of the investment markets offer compelling investment opportunities, especially those that are not dependent on government incentives and those in geographies with high electricity prices. The Board and management of Leaf continued to support and grow Leaf's existing portfolio to ensure that its investee companies are well-positioned as the market improves. Selected highlights are as follows (with further details given in the "Portfolio Overview" section at the end of this report). · SkyFuel, Inc. (SkyFuel), a leading concentrated solar equipment provider, achieved the first third-party warranty coverage in the CSP sub-sector. Following more than a year of extensive due diligence on SkyFuel's products, Munich Re, a leading worldwide reinsurance company, agreed to underwrite insurance for SkyFuel's product warranties. These warranties guarantee the thermal output of SkyFuel's SkyTrough system for five years and the specular reflectance of the SkyTrough reflectors for 20 years. SkyFuel's ability to offer innovative and capital-efficient insurance backing in support of its equipment sales provides a distinct advantage in a market that is reliant on risk-averse lenders for project finance. · Johnstown Regional Energy, LLC (JRE), a large landfill gas reclamation company, negotiated and entered into long-term fixed-price contracts to sell its green biogas to buyers in California. The California market provides an appropriate price incentive for green gas and will partially offset the unfavourable impact on JRE of the dramatic drop in natural gas prices resulting from the development of shale gas. · Invenergy Wind LLC (Invenergy), the largest independent wind developer in the US, closed a $200 million long-term loan financing and closed project financing for six wind projects. During the period, five of these projects finished construction and commenced commercial operations. In addition, Invenergy completed construction and began commercial operations at its previously financed 138.6 MW Le Plateau Wind Energy Centre in Quebec. Finally, Invenergy completed the sale of its 81 MW Bishop Hill II wind project in Henry County, Illinois to MidAmerican Renewables, capping off a productive year for the company. · Certain sub-sectors of the broader clean energy and sustainable investment market have provided opportunities for attractive investment and portfolio diversification. The Leaf Board and management reviewed hundreds of new opportunities during the year and were pleased to announce in July 2012 that Leaf has led an investment round in Lehigh Technologies, Inc. ("Lehigh"). The investment in Lehigh closed on 20 July 2012, after the end of the current reporting period. Lehigh is a leading sustainable materials manufacturer whose proprietary, cryogenic turbo mill technology turns end-of-life and post-industrial rubber material into sustainable chemical additives that are used in a wide range of industrial and consumer applications. Lehigh's micronized rubber powder ("MRP") products help customers lower their consumption of oil-derived and energy intensive materials. Its MRPs lower costs, increase the sustainability profile of end products, and deliver performance without sacrificing the reliability offered by traditional raw materials. Lehigh is a late-stage venture-backed company with a growing revenue stream. Prior to Lehigh, only a few outlets for end-of-life material existed, with it being incinerated, sent to landfills, or reused in lower-value applications. Lehigh addresses these environmental challenges for millions of pounds of material each year, all the while saving customers money and reducing the energy-intensity of its customers' raw materials. This is a disruptive technology, a high-growth company, and is led by a top-tier management team. Lehigh also further diversifies Leaf's investment portfolio. Financial Performance Leaf's total NAV on 30 June 2012 was US$182 million, US$38 million lower than the NAV at 30 June 2011. The change in NAV over the annual report period resulted mainly from the US$27.2 million unrealized loss on revaluation of the Company's investments, operating expenses of US$5.9 million, and $4.8 million of share repurchases. US$42 million of the Company's NAV was held in cash and US$143 million in investments. NAV per share for the Leaf portfolio was 141.22 cents or 90.04 pence at US$1.5685 to the £1. This was a decrease of 14.7 percent for the one year period from 30 June 2011. The decrease for the one year period was due primarily to the unrealised loss on revaluation of the Company's investments (-12.8%) and operating expenses for the period (-2.7%), offset by share repurchases (+0.8%). For the period under review, there were several other noteworthy events: · Leaf made an additional US$7.6 million of direct equity and debt investments in existing portfolio businesses; · The Company earned US$1.8 million of interest income from debt investments in the portfolio companies during the period. This income has been recorded in the accounts of the intermediate holding companies and included in the assessment of valuations for the relevant subsidiaries; · Leaf repurchased 3.9 million shares at an average price of 77.98 pence, taking advantage of the weakness in the Company's share price to deliver value to shareholders; and · The Company received cash payments of accrued and current interest and repayments of principal on loans to its investee companies totalling US$5.1 million and US$15.5 million respectively. Market Environment The four quarters ended 30 June 2012 witnessed a pull-back in the global recovery in clean energy investing that had been underway during 2010 and 2011. This contraction was due to the combination of continued global economic problems and interrelated political developments in the US and Europe. The continuing sovereign debt crisis has brought austerity measures and credit tightening into play across Europe. The increasing polarisation of the US Congress, exacerbated by presidential election year politics, has made it difficult, if not impossible, for it to address long-term structural issues in the US federal budget. These factors, combined with the impact of abundant and low-cost shale gas in the US, have had a dampening effect on policy support for clean energy in these geographies. Another clear impact of these global economic issues for the sector and for Leaf's portfolio companies has been that it has become much more difficult for clean energy companies to raise new capital. Ironically, the resulting weakening and increased uncertainty about the continuation and extent of government renewable energy subsidies in Europe and the US has come about just as several renewable energy technologies are approaching, but have not yet quite attained, grid parity versus the fossil fuels against which they compete. A main goal of government subsidisation of renewable energy has been to enable sustainably profitable business models in order to encourage the private investment in capacity and technology required to achieve grid parity with fossil fuels. The current pull-back in subsidisation has pulled the carpet out from under many who invested on that premise. The end result may be that the timing of grid parity will be delayed and may require even greater subsidisation to reach this goal than would otherwise have been required had governments stayed the course. In the case of solar PV, the remarkable progress towards grid parity has come at the expense of many of the early-stage and established US and European players in this market. Manufacturers of solar PV panels have continued to experience a brutal pricing environment due to global over-capacity and competition from Asian panel manufacturers who have been accused by US and European firms of pricing below cost in US and European markets. This resulted in the application by the US in March 2012 of countervailing duties on Chinese solar panels and in May 2012 of countervailing duties and anti-dumping duties on Chinese wind towers and solar panels. By the end of the current reporting period, massive over-capacity and cutthroat pricing in the solar PV market had resulted in the bankruptcies of an additional 13 solar PV panel manufacturers, in the wake of the high-profile bankruptcy of early-stage Solyndra in August 2011. These bankruptcies included several established manufacturers such as Q-Cells, Evergreen Solar and Solon, while many other PV manufacturers have had to cut jobs and reduce production to conserve cash. As expected, the severe depression of public market prices for solar PV panel manufacturers resulting from this environment has brought about a wave of consolidation M&A activity. For the year ending 30 June 2012, global investment by venture capital ("VC") and private equity ("PE") firms in clean energy was US$7.5 billion, which was flat compared to the previous year ended 30 June 2011. For the latest quarter ending 30 June 2012, investment was down 28% from the previous calendar quarter and down 39% from the prior-year quarter. In calendar year 2011 solar was the most popular sector for VC/PE investment, with 30% of the US$2.4 billion of total solar investment directed to crystalline PV and the remainder invested in solar thermal, thin film and service and support. A total of US$367 million was invested by VC/PE in solar thermal. Global acquisition activity in renewable energy was up year-on-year by 10.5% and 12.1% in dollar terms, respectively, for calendar year 2011 and the year ended 30 June 2012. For calendar year 2011, activity in the US was down by 22%, while in Europe it was up 34%. Two European deals dominated: the US$7.9 billion buyout by EDF of the remaining 50% of EDF Energies Nouvelles it did not own and the US$2.1 billion buyout by Iberdrola of the remaining 20% of Iberdrola Renovables it did not own. Without these two large re-acquisitions of corporate spin-offs by their parents - deals that perhaps indicate the parents' view that public market prices in wind and solar are at irrationally low levels - European acquisitions would have been down 4%. In the public markets, new raises from renewable energy IPOs were down 15% and 77% on a global basis in dollar terms for calendar year 2011 and the year ended 30 June 2012 respectively. The activity during both periods was dominated by solar, wind and China. Macroeconomic and political pressures depressed prices of existing public renewable energy companies, as measured by the NEX index, which fell 40% and 44%, for calendar year 2011 and the year ended 30 June 2012, respectively, as compared to the S&P 500, which was flat for calendar year 2011 and increased by 1.7% during the four quarters ended 30 June 2012. This decline in public market valuations for renewable energy companies has continued to put pressure on private company valuations, including the prices for many businesses comparable or related to Leaf's portfolio companies. Outlook While the short-term data are unfavourable, the long-term drivers for increased adoption of renewable energy in North America remain strong. These long-term drivers include the underlying trend of rising fossil-fuel costs, the need to find new industrial sources of economic growth and job creation, the desire to achieve energy independence and to maintain global competitiveness, increasing global demand for energy, and the need to address climate change issues. Collectively, these factors provide evidence that the NEX is in an oversold position. Public and private valuations are attractive to buyers in many cases and have created opportunities for discerning investors such as Leaf who are in a position to identify and capture this value. Given the increase in the expected length of time to liquidity events for its existing portfolio companies as a result of the current state of the global economy, Leaf has continued to focus in the short term on the management of its existing portfolio, having prudently maintained sufficient cash to provide appropriate financing for its portfolio. Portfolio Overview A. Active Investments - Growth Companies MaxWest Environmental Systems ("MaxWest") Waste-to-energy gasification Investment: US$23.8mm Ownership: Significant Stake Company Summary Recent Highlights MaxWest designs, builds, owns and · Completed the next-generation operates waste-to-energy gasification version of the proprietary MaxWest facilities specifically applied to waste gasification technology and water facilities. successfully installed it at the Sanford site MaxWest plants can be "bolted-on" to existing water treatment facilities, · Highlighted at the Clinton providing municipalities and industrial Global Initiative's (CGI) Seventh sites with a cost-effective, Annual Meeting in New York City for environmentally friendly alternative to its Commitment to Action, "Landfill traditional methods of waste disposal. Reduction through Biosolids Processing", which noted its exemplary approach to addressing challenges in environment and energy www.maxwestenergy.com SkyFuel Inc. ("SkyFuel") Concentrated Solar Power Investment: US$28.3mm Ownership: Significant stake Company Summary Recent Highlights SkyFuel was founded in 2007 and is an emerging technology leader in the solar thermal power § Became first in the CSP industry to offer equipment sector. insurance to support the company's product warranties, underwritten by one of the world's leading reinsurance companies, Munich Re SkyFuel is one of the few remaining stand-alone concentrated solar power ("CSP") technology providers. § Secured a large-scale domestic commercial order SkyFuel possesses proprietary and patented technologies which provide a meaningful cost advantage relative to its competitors: § SkyTrough® - an advanced, low-cost, accurate parabolic trough based on ReflecTech®, and § ReflecTech® Mirror Film - a shatterproof glass alternative www.skyfuel.com/#/NEWS/ www.skyfuel.com B. Active Investments - Projects Johnstown Regional Energy, LLC ("JRE") Landfill Gas Investment: US$33mm Ownership: Wholly owned Company Summary Recent Highlights JRE owns and operates three high-Btu landfill § Entered into long-term, gas-to-methane projects in Pennsylvania. fixed-price contracts to sell JRE's green gas to California buyers JRE extracts raw landfill gas that is subsequently cleaned in advanced technology processing plants and sold to utility gas § Currently selling 100% of providers via connecting pipelines as an JRE's gas to buyers in alternative to fossil-based natural gas. California This high quality "green" gas ultimately displaces the use of fossil-fuel-based natural gas, making it eligible for premium pricing in states which have renewable protocol standards (RPSs) incorporating reclaimed landfill gas. www.jreenergy.com Multitrade Rabun Gap ("Rabun Gap") Wood-fuelled biomass Investment: US$11.4mm Ownership: Majority Company Summary Recent Highlights Rabun Gap is a 20 MW capacity § O&M management firm has completed wood-fuelled bio-mass facility in operational improvement plans which have Georgia. decreased burn rate and increased output Rabun Gap utilises renewable fuel § Experiencing continued from the local forest industry and higher-than-expected fuel prices due to sells power to a Georgia co-operative the US Department of Agriculture's under a long-term power purchase apparent decision to refocus its BCAP agreement. Program Multitrade Telogia ("Telogia") Wood-fuelled biomass Investment: US$7.3mm Ownership: Majority Company Summary Recent Highlights Telogia is a 14 MW capacity § Closed permanent financing via a USDA wood-fuelled bio-mass facility in guaranteed loan from a commercial bank and Telogia, Florida. repaid Leaf's outstanding construction loan principal and interest Telogia utilises renewable fuel from the local forest industry and § Experiencing higher-than-expected fuel sells power to a local prices due to the US Department of co-operative under a long-term Agriculture's apparent decision to refocus power purchase agreement. its BCAP Program § Optimization of plant performance resulted in record output and EBITDA for Telogia during the annual reporting period Vital Renewable Energy Company ("VREC") Biofuels - Ethanol Investment: US$20.9mm Ownership: Significant stake Company Summary Recent Highlights VREC is a renewable energy company focused on the development of sugar-cane-based ethanol facilities and electricity generation in Brazil, § VREC pursuing industrial as well as related infrastructure projects. and agricultural expansion plans www.vrec.com.br Energía Escalona ("Escalona") Hydro Investment: US$8.6mm Ownership: Majority Company Summary Recent Highlights Escalona is a hydroelectric project § Escalona reached several development development company based in Mexico milestones in the past fiscal year, City. The company's flagship including permitting approval from the development is a 12 MW run-of-river Mexican archaeological authority and hydroelectric facility located in approval of the final design and pathway Veracruz, Mexico. § The Escalona project in Veracruz continues to be one of the premier projects in Mexico given the large pressure and steady water flows C. Passive Investments Invenergy Wind LLC ("Invenergy") Wind Power Investment: US$30.0mm Ownership: Minority Company Summary Recent Highlights The largest independently-owned § Completed construction and began wind energy developer in North commercial operations at its 110 MW Gratiot America, having put more than County wind project in Breckenridge, 3,000 MW into operation since Michigan, for which it had obtained equity 2004. financing from GE Energy Financial Services in October 2011 In addition to its large portfolio of operating assets, Invenergy § Closed financing and commenced also has a strong and diversified commercial operations at three of the wind pipeline of 700 MW of wind power projects it owns with its partner, Enerco, projects in advanced stages of with a combined capacity of 80 MW located development across North America in northwest Poland and Europe. § Closed debt financing for its 200 MW California Ridge wind project currently under construction in central Illinois www.invenergyllc.com § Completed construction and began commercial operations at its 138.6 MW Le Plateau Wind Energy Centre in Quebec § Completed the sale of its 81 MW Bishop Hill II wind project in Henry County, Illinois to MidAmerican Renewables § Closed a strongly oversubscribed $200 million long-term loan financing § Closed project financing for its 200 MW Bishop Hill wind project in Henry County, Illinois www.invenergyllc.com/news.html Miasolé Solar PV Investment: US$21.5mm Ownership: Minority Company Summary Recent Highlights Miasolé develops and manufactures § Announced the achievement of a champion thin-film device efficiency of 17.3% and that it is copper-indium-gallium-diselenide producing modules with 14% efficiency in (CIGS) solar photovoltaic cells. commercial volumes Miasolé's panels are designed to be § Strengthened its senior leadership, used in residential, commercial and appointing a new CEO, John Carrington and utility developments. new president, Bob Baker, both former senior executives at First Solar and Intel Miasolé utilises a differentiated vacuum deposition process that is highly efficient and designed to apply CIGS material over large-area substrates in a continuous fashion. Miasolé is leveraging expertise in semiconductor manufacturing and a deep understanding of CIGS material to manufacture new, versatile and www.miasole.com/pgs-news/overview.shtml low-cost solar products. www.miasole.com 12 November 2012 Parent company statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 30 June 2012 Note Year ended Year ended 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Interest income on cash balances 7 65 48 Unrealised losses on revaluation of investments at fair value through profit or loss 12.2 (27,261) (5,339) Gain on restructuring of subsidiary 11 3,381 Net foreign exchange gain (loss) (8) 125 Gross portfolio return (27,204) (1,785) Management service fees 8 (3,721) (3,776) Other administration expenses 9 (2,214) (2,752) Total expenses (5,935) (6,528) Loss before taxation (33,139) (8,313) Taxation 3.7 - - Loss for the year and comprehensive loss for the year (33,139) (8,313) Basic and diluted loss per share (cents) 17 (25.35) (5.83) The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements Parent company statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012 Note 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Assets Investments in subsidiaries at fair value 12.2 143,237 178,400 through profit or loss Total non-current assets 143,237 178,400 Trade and other receivables 13 1,966 2,509 Cash and cash equivalents 14 42,120 40,559 Total current assets 44,086 43,068 Total assets 187,323 221,468 Equity Share capital 15 28 29 Share premium 15 306,809 311,574 Retained losses (125,029) (91,890) Total equity 181,808 219,713 Trade and other payables 8,9.2,16 5,064 1,729 Unpaid capital contributions to 451 26 subsidiaries Total current liabilities 5,515 1,755 Total liabilities 5,515 1,755 Total equity and liabilities 187,323 221,468 Net asset value per share (cents) 6 141.22 165.60 The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 12 November 2012 and signed on their behalf by: Peter Tom J. Curtis Moffatt Non-Executive Chairman Non-Executive Director Parent company statement of changes in equity for the year ended 30 June 2012 Share Capital Share Premium Retained losses Total US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Balance at 1 July 2011 29 311,574 (91,890) 219,713 Total comprehensive loss - - (33,139) (33,139) Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity: Contributions by and distributions to owners Repurchase of shares (1) (4,765) - (4,766) Total contributions by and (1) (4,765) - (4,766) distributions to owners Balance at 30 June 2012 28 306,809 (125,029) 181,808 Balance at 1 July 2010 30 323,115 (83,577) 239,568 Total comprehensive loss - - (8,313) (8,313) Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity: Contributions by and distributions to owners Repurchase of shares (1) (11,541) - (11,542) Total contributions by and (1) (11,541) - (11,542) distributions to owners Balance at 30 June 2011 29 311,574 (91,890) 219,713 The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements Parent company statement of cash flows for the year ended 30 June 2012 Year ended Year ended Note 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Cash flows from operating activities Interest received on cash balances 65 48 Operating expenses paid (5,960) (6,417) Net cash used in operating activities (5,895) (6,369) Cash flows from investing activities Repayment of capital by subsidiaries at fair 12.2 15,909 8,409 value through profit or loss Additional investments in subsidiaries at fair 12.2 (7,582) (31,355) value through profit or loss Amount repaid by/(paid to) group companies 3,903 (1,389) Payment of unpaid share capital to subsidiaries - (6,930) Net cash generated from/(used in) investing 12,230 (31,265) activities Cash flows from financing activities Repurchase of shares 15 (4,766) (11,542) Net cash used in financing activities (4,766) (11,542) Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash 1,569 (49,176) equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at start of the year 40,559 89,609 Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash (8) 126 and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 42,120 40,559 Reconciliation of loss before taxation to net Year ended Year ended cash used in operating activities Note 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Loss before taxation (33,139) (8,313) Adjustments for: Unrealised losses on revaluation of investments at fair value through profit or loss 12.2 27,261 5,339 Gain on restructuring of subsidiary 11 - (3,381) Foreign exchange (loss)/gain 8 (125) Movement in trade and other receivables 8 (912) Movement in trade and other payables (33) 1,023 Net cash used in operating activities (5,895) (6,369) The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements Notes to the parent company financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2012 1 The Company Leaf Clean Energy Company ("Leaf" or the "Company") was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on 14 May 2007. The Company was established to invest in clean energy projects, predominantly in North America. Clean energy includes activities such as the production of alternative fuels, renewable power generation and the use of technologies to reduce the environmental impact of traditional energy. The Company seeks to achieve long term capital appreciation primarily through making privately negotiated acquisitions of interest (principally equity but also equity-related and subordinated or mezzanine debt securities) in both projects and companies which own assets or which participate in the clean energy sector and through the generation and commercialisation of carbon credits derived from these projects. Pursuant to the Company's Admission Document dated 22 June 2007 there was an original placing of up to 200,000,000 Ordinary Shares of GBP0.0001 par value for GBP1 each. The Shares of the Company were admitted to trading on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange ("AIM") on 28 June 2007 when dealings also commenced. The Company's agents and the in-house management team perform all significant functions. 2 Basis of preparation 2.1 Statement of compliance The Company's separate financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). In order to present information that is comparable with other investment companies, Leaf publishes separate financial statements of the Company in addition to consolidated financial statements, which include investments in subsidiaries regarded as part of the Company's investing business at fair value. The financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on12 November 2012. 2.2 Basis of measurement The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the investments in subsidiaries that are measured at fair value in the statement of financial position. 2.3 Functional and presentation currency The financial statements are presented in United States Dollars ("US$"), which is the Company's functional currency. All financial information presented in US$ has been rounded to the nearest thousand, except when otherwise indicated. 2.4 Use of estimates and judgements The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected. The most significant area requiring estimation and judgement by the Directors is the valuation of unquoted investments, see note 5 and 12. 3 Significant accounting policies The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements. 3.1 Financial instruments (i) Non-derivative financial assets The Company classifies non-derivative financial assets into the following categories: investments at fair value through profit or loss and, loans and receivables. The Company initially recognised loans and receivables on the date that they are originated. All other financial assets (including assets designated as at fair value through profit or loss) are recognised initially on trade date, which is the date that the Group becomes a party to the contractual provision of the instrument. The Company derecognise a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the instrument expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest in such transferred assets that is created or retained by the Company is recognised as a separate asset or liability. Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Company has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realise and settle the liability simultaneously. Investments in subsidiaries The Company designated its investments in subsidiaries, including equity, loan and similar instruments, as at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. Attributable transaction costs are recognised in the profit or loss as incurred. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value of investments, including foreign exchange movements, are recognised in the profit or loss. Unquoted investments are valued using recognised valuation methodologies, based on the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Guidelines, which reflect the amount for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties on an arm's length basis. Loans and receivables Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses. Loans and receivables comprise cash and cash equivalents, and trade and other receivables. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash balances and call deposits with maturities of three months or fewer from the acquisition date that are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, and are used by the Company in the management of its short-term commitments. (ii) Non-derivative financial liabilities The Company classifies non-derivative financial liabilities into the other financial liability category. Such financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value less any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these financial liabilities are measured at amortised costs using the effective interest method. The Company initially recognises debt securities issued and subordinated liabilities on the date that they are originated. All other financial liabilities (including liabilities designated as at fair value through profit or loss) are recognised initially on trade date, which is the date that the Group becomes a party to the contractual provision of the instrument. The Company derecognises a financial liability when the contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire. Other financial liabilities comprise bank overdrafts, and trade and other payables. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Company's cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows. 3.1 Share capital Ordinary shares Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects. Repurchase of share capital When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable costs, net of any tax effects, is recognised as a deduction from equity. 3.3 Revenue and expense recognition Interest income is recognised on a time-proportionate basis using the effective interest rate method. Dividends receivable on equity and non-equity shares, which carry significant equity rights, are recognised as revenue when the shareholders' right to receive payment has been established, normally ex-dividend date. When no ex-dividend date is available, dividends receivable on or before the period end are treated as revenue for the period. Provision is made for any dividends not expected to be received. Fixed returns on debt securities and loans are recognised on an effective interest rate basis, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset's net carrying amount. Expenses are accounted for on an accrual basis and are charged to profit or loss. This includes expenses directly related to making an investment which is held at fair value through profit or loss. 3.4 Foreign currency translation Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency of the Company at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences arising on retranslation are recognised in profit or loss. 3.5 Dividends payable Dividends payable are recognised as a liability in the period in which they are declared and approved. 3.6 Earnings per share The Company presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for own shares held. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, adjusted for own shares held, for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which comprise convertible notes and share options granted to employees. 3.7 Income tax expense Cayman Islands taxation The Company received from the Governor-in-Cabinet of the Cayman Islands, an undertaking that, for a period of 20 years from 5 June 2007 no laws of the Cayman Islands imposing any tax on profits, income, gains or appreciation shall apply to the Company and that no such tax or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax shall be payable on the shares, debentures or other obligations of the Company. Under the current Cayman Islands law, no tax will be charged on profits or gains of the Company and dividends of the Company would be payable to Shareholders resident in or outside the Cayman Islands without deduction of tax. 3.8 Future changes in accounting policies IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) and IFRIC (International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee) have issued the following standards and interpretations with an effective date after the date of these financial statements: New/Revised International Financial Reporting Effective date Standards (IAS/IFRS) (accounting periods commencing on or after) IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements - 1 July 2012 Amendments to revise the way other comprehensive income is presented (June 2011) IAS 12 Income Taxes - Limited scope amendment (recovery of underlying assets) (December 2010) 1 January 2012 IAS 19 Employee Benefits - Amendment resulting from the Post-Employment Benefits and Termination Benefits projects (as amended in June 2011) 1 January 2013 IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements 1 January 2013 - Reissued as IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (as amended in May 2011) IAS 28 Investments in Associates - Reissued as IAS 28 1 January 2013 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (as amended in May 2011) IAS 32 Financial Instruments Presentation - 1 January 2014 Amendments to application guidance on the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities (December 2011) IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures - 1 January 2013 Amendments enhancing disclosures about offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities (December 2011) IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures - 1 January 2015 Amendments requiring disclosures about the initial applicable of IFRS 9 (December 2011) IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Classification and 1 January 2015 measurement of financial assets (as amended in December 2011) IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Accounting for 1 January 2015 financial liabilities and derecognition (as amended in December 2011) IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (May 2011) 1 January 2013 IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (May 2011) 1 January 2013 IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities 1 January 2013 (May 2011) IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (May 2011) 1 January 2013 IFRIC Interpretation IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a 1 January 2013 Surface Mine The Directors do not expect the adoption of the standards and interpretations to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements in the period of initial application. 4 Financial risk management The Parent Company's investments expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, market price risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. Market price risk The subsidiaries in which the Company invests operate in sectors that may be affected by the prevailing prices of electricity, oil, natural gas and other commodities. As energy and fuels derived from non-renewable sources become more expensive or scarce, renewable energy and alternative fuels become more valuable. Conversely, if non-renewable energy and fuels become more abundant or, for other reasons become less expensive, the value of renewable or alternative fuels may be negatively affected. As a result, the performance of the project companies is likely to be dependent upon prevailing prices for these commodities, which have been historically, and may continue to be, volatile and subject to wide variations for a variety of reasons beyond the control of the Company. These factors include the level of consumer product demand, weather conditions, governmental regulations in producing and consuming countries, the price and availability of alternative fuels, the supply of oil and natural gas, and overall geo-political and economic conditions. Therefore, volatility of commodity prices may adversely affect the value of the Company'sinvestments. Market price risk is managed by the management team of the Company, in accordance with parameters set by the Board. All of the Company'sinvestments comprise interests in companies which are not publicly traded or freely marketable. The Company may also be restricted from selling certain securities by contract or regulatory considerations. Such investments may therefore be difficult to value or realise. Any such realisation may involve significant time and expense. If the value of the Company'sinvestment portfolio increased/decreased by 5%, the net assets of the Company would increase/decrease by US$7,232,372 (2011: US$9,015,949) Foreign exchange risk The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk with regard to transactions made in Sterling and balances held in Sterling. An analysis of net assets by currency exposure as at 30 June 2012 is as follows: Net Assets Net Assets US$'000s US$'000s 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 US Dollars 181,702 219,881 Sterling 106 (168) Total 181,808 219,713 An appreciation of the Sterling against the US Dollar of 5% would have decreased net assets by US$5,034 (2011: US$5,232). A decrease of 5% would have an equal and opposite effect. Interest rate risk The Company is exposed to cash flow interest rate risk on cash balances which are all short term fixed deposits. The weighted average interest rates on short term fixed deposits as at 30 June 2012 were: 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 % % Cash balances US Dollars 0.15 0.05 Sterling - - Interest rate risk(continued) The table below summarises the Company's exposure to interest rate risks. It includes thefinancial assets and liabilities at the earlier of contractual re-pricing or maturity date, measured by the carrying values of assets and liabilities: 30 June 2012 Less 1-3 3 months 1-5 Over 5 Non-interest Total than months years 1month to 1 Years bearing year US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Financial Assets Investments in subsidiaries at fair value - - - - - 143,237 143,237 through profit or loss Trade and other - - - - - 1,966 1,966 receivables Cash and cash 35,027 - - - - 7,093 42,120 equivalents Total financial 35,027 - - - - 152,296 187,323 assets Financial Liabilities Trade and other - - - - - (5,064) (5,064) payables Unpaid capital contributions to subsidiaries - - - - - (451) (451) Total financial - - - - - (5,515) (5,515) liabilities Total interest rate sensitivity gap 35,027 - - - - 30 June 2011 Less 1-3 3 months 1-5 Over 5 Non-interest Total than months years 1month to 1 Years bearing year US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Financial Assets Investments in subsidiaries at fair value - - - - - 178,400 178,400 through profit or loss Trade and other - - - - - 2,509 2,509 receivables Cash and cash 39,110 - 1,449 - - - 40,559 equivalents Total financial 39,110 - 1,449 - - 180,909 221,468 assets Financial Liabilities Trade and other - - - - - (1,729) (1,729) payables Unpaid capital contributions to subsidiaries - - - - - (26) (26) Total financial - - - - - (1,755) (1,755) liabilities Total interest rate sensitivity gap 39,110 - 1,449 - - No fair value interest rate sensitivity analysis has been provided as no financial assets or liabilities are subject to fair value interest rate risk. If interest rates have been 1% higher/lower for the year, interest receivable would have been US$350,265(2011: US$405,590) higher/lower. Credit risk Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation or commitment that it has entered into with the Company. The carrying amounts of financial assets best represent the maximum credit risk exposure at the reporting date. This relates also to financial assets carried at amortised cost, as they have a short term maturity. At the reporting date, the Company'sfinancial assets exposed to credit risk amounted to the following: 30 June 2012 30 June 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Investments in subsidiaries at fair value through 143,237 178,400 profit or loss Trade and other receivables 1,966 2,509 Cash and cash equivalents 42,120 40,559 187,323 221,468 The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset in the statement of financial position. Management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.No impairment provisions have been made as at the year end and no debtors were past their due date. Cash balances are held with P-1* financial institutions. *- A Moody's rating of Prime-1 (P-1) means that the issuer has a superior ability to repay short-term debt for the obligations. Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when they fall due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses. The Company's liquidity position is monitored by the Board of Directors. Residual undiscounted contractual maturities of financial liabilities: 30 June 2012 Less than 1-3 3 months 1-5 years Over 5 No stated to 1 year years maturity 1 month months US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Financial liabilities Trade and other (5,064) - - - - - payables Unpaid capital (451) contributions to subsidiaries (5,515) - - - - - 30 June 2011 Less than 1-3 3 months 1-5 years Over 5 No stated to 1 year years maturity 1 month months US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Financial liabilities Trade and other (1,729) - - - - - payables Unpaid capital (26) contributions to subsidiaries (1,755) - - - - - Fair values All assets and liabilities at 30 June 2012 are considered to be stated at fair value. 5. Critical accounting estimates and assumptions These disclosures supplement the commentary on financial risk management (see note 4). Key sources of estimation uncertainty Determining fair values The determination of fair values for financial assets for which there is no observable market prices requires the use of valuation techniques as described in accounting policy 3.1. For financial instruments that trade infrequently and have little price transparency, fair value is less objective, and requires varying degrees of judgement depending on liquidity, concentration, uncertainty of market factors, pricing assumptions and other risks affecting the specific instrument. See also "Valuation of financial instruments" below. Critical judgements in applying the Company's accounting policies Critical judgements made in applying the Company's accounting policies include: Valuation of financial instruments The Company's accounting policy on fair value measurements is discussed in accounting policy 3.1. The Company measures fair value using the following hierarchy that reflects the significance of inputs used in making the measurements: · Level 1: Quoted market price (unadjusted) in an active market for an identical instrument. · Level 2: Valuation techniques based on observable inputs, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices). This category includes instruments valued using: quoted market prices in active markets for similar instruments: quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are considered less than active; or other valuation techniques where all significant inputs are directly or indirectly observable from market data. · Level 3: Valuation techniques using significant unobservable inputs. This category includes all instruments where the valuation technique includes inputs not based on observable data and the unobservable inputs have a significant effect on the instrument's valuation. This category includes instruments that are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments where significant unobservable adjustments or assumptions are required to reflect differences between the instruments. Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities that are traded in active markets are basedon quoted market prices or dealer price quotations. For all other financial instruments the Company determines fair values using valuation techniques. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, holds full or partial ownership interests in a number of unquoted clean energy companies. The Company's investments are classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. A reconciliation from the beginning balances to the ending balances is shown in note 12. 6 Net Asset Value per Share The net asset value per share as at 30 June 2012 is 141.22 cents based on net assets of US$181,808,657 and 128,745,726ordinary shares in issue as at that date (2011: 165.60 cents based on net assets of US$219,713,487 and 132,675,726ordinary shares). 7 Interest income on cash balances Year ended 30 June Year ended 30 June 2012 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Interest income receivable on Sterling - 1 cash balances Interest income receivable on US Dollar 65 47 cash balances 65 48 8 Management service fees Leaf's wholly-owned subsidiary, Leaf Clean Energy USA, LLC ("Leaf USA"), in Washington, DCprovides assets advisory, portfolio management and certain administrative services to the Company. Leaf USA is entitled to management fees which are calculated based on 20% mark up on the costs of the asset advisory and portfolio management services provided to Leaf Clean Energy Company. The administrative services provided to Leaf Clean Energy Company are at cost base with nil mark up. Leaf USA Service fees for the year ended 30 June 2012 payable to Leaf USA were US$3,721,087 (year ended 30June2011: US$3,775,686) and the amount accrued but not paid at the period end was US$584,690 (30 June 2011: US$364,626). 9 Other administration expenses Year ended 30 June Year ended 30 June 2012 2011 US$'000 US$'000 Directors' remuneration (note 10) 1,248 1,069 Legal and professional fees (note 9.1) 228 715 Administration fees (note 9.2) 195 313 Travel and subsistence expenses 289 259 Directors' and Officers' insurance 97 106 expense Audit fees 89 99 Other expenses 9 93 Printing and stationery expenses 15 50 Registrar fees and costs 44 48 Total 2,214 2,752 9.1 Legal and professional fees Legal and professional fees represent legal, advisory and consultancy fees incurred during and after the implementation of investment acquisitions. 9.2 Administration fees With effect from November 2009, the Company administrator is entitled to an administration fee, payable quarterly in arrears and calculated in respect of each quarter or other period with a minimum fee of GBP25,000 per quarter at the rate of 0.1% per annum where the total assets of the parent company less borrowings is less than US$100,000,000; 0.09% where the total assets of the Company less borrowings at the end of the relevant quarter is greater than or equal to US$100,000,000 but less than US$200,000,000; and at the rate of 0.08% per annum where the total assets of the Company less borrowings at the end of the relevant quarter is greater than or equal to US$200,000,000. Administration fees for the year amounted to US$195,056 (2011: US$312,840) and US$42,493 was outstanding as at 30 June 2012 (2011: US$53,049). 10 Directors' remuneration In February 2011, Mercer Limited ("Mercer") was engaged to conduct an independent remuneration review, and Mercer's recommendation was adopted by the Board at its meeting on 3 March 2011. As recommended by Mercer, the basic annual remuneration for the Chairman and the Executive Director was maintained at US$200,000 and US$400,000 respectively. In addition, the Executive Director is eligible to receive an annual bonus of US$350,000. The Non-Executive Directors fees were reduced from US$150,000 to US$60,000 with a US$2,500 fee for each board meeting attendance, a US$10,000 fee for Audit Committee membership and a US$1,500 fee reimbursement for each additional day attending the Company's meetings. Details of the Directors' basic annual remuneration during the year were as follows: Remuneration for Remuneration for the Remuneration for the year to period from 1 April period from 1 July 2010 2011 to 30 June 2011 to 31 March 2011 30 June 2012 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Peter Tom 200 200 200 (Chairman) Bran Keogh 400 400 400 J. Curtis 148 60 150 Moffatt Peter O'Keefe 150 60 150 898 720 900 Directors' fees and expenses paid during the year were as follows: 30 June 2012 Directors' fees Annual bonus Total US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Peter Tom (Chairman) 200 - 200 Bran Keogh 400 350 750 J. Curtis Moffatt 148 - 148 Peter O'Keefe 150 - 150 898 350 1,248 30 June 2011 Directors' fees Other emoluments Total US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 Peter Tom (Chairman) 200 - 200 Bran Keogh 400 175 575 J. Curtis Moffatt 143 - 143 Peter O'Keefe 151 - 151 894 175 1,069 The Directors are also entitled to receive reimbursement of any expenses in relation to their appointment. Total reimbursement fees paid to the Directors for the year ended 30 June 2012amounted to US$218,230 (2011: US$216,750) of which US$nil was outstanding at 30 June 2012 (June 2011: US$nil). 11 Gain on restructuring of subsidiary For efficient portfolio management purposes, the Company dissolved one of its subsidiaries in 2011, Leaf Finance Company, and distributed its net assets to the Company. The dissolution resulted in a one-time net gain of US$3,381,454.This had no effect on profit or loss or net assets of the Company as investments in subsidiaries are stated at fair value and there was a consequent movement in the unrealised gain/loss on revaluation. 12 Investments 12.1 The subsidiaries Since incorporation, for efficient portfolio management purposes, the Company has established the following subsidiary companies: Country of Percentage of incorporation shares held Leaf Bioenergy Company Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Biomass Company Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Biomass Investments, Inc.* USA (Delaware) 100% Leaf Clean Energy USA, LLC USA (Delaware) 100% Leaf Escalona Company* Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Hydro Company Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Invenergy Company* Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Invenergy US Investments, Inc* USA (Delaware) 100% Leaf LFG Company Cayman Islands 100% Leaf LFG US Investments, Inc.* USA (Delaware) 100% Leaf MaxWest Company* USA (Delaware) 100% Leaf Miasolé* Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Skyfuels Company* Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Solar Company Cayman Islands 100% Leaf VREC* Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Waste Energy Cayman Islands 100% Leaf Wind Company Cayman Islands 100% *Indirect subsidiaries The story has been truncated, [TRUNCATED]
Leaf Clean Energy Co LEAF Final Results
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.


text:
Architectural Delight
1 Dr Carlton B Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102
+1 415 554 4000
While the original City Hall was destroyed and left in ruins by the infamous 1906 earthquake, the Beaux-Arts style building that you see today was designed by Arthur Brown and opened on the same site in 1915. The grand monument sits in the midst of San Francisco's Civic Center complex and occupies two full city blocks. The building has played host to many historical events for the city. The halls are dotted with statues and busts of former mayors, and the height of the dome, modeled after St. Peter's Church in Rome, even rivals that of the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. The palatial space has been the setting for some notable occasions, including the marriage of Marilyn Monroe and Joe DiMaggio in 1954. The building saw tragedy in 1978 when former Supervisor Dan White assassinated Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk. Visitors may take self-guided tours of City Hall, which is open to the public on weekdays.
Nearest Train or Bus:
MUNI BUS: 42, 49; MUNI STREETCAR: J, K, L, M, N: BART: Civic Center Station
Best Modes of Transportation: Bus Subway Taxi Walking
Parking Availability: Yes
Average Price per Hour: $0-$5
Notes: Metered parking is available on Van Ness, McAllister, Grove, and Dr Carlton B Goodlett Place. A CityPark underground parking lot is located on McAllister, between Dr Carlton B Goodlett Place and Larkin.
If you like this attraction, you might also like this:
While you're in the neighborhood, visit:


text:
Funny Or Die
loading more...
Already have an account?
Sign In!
Forgot Password?
Stay signed in
Don't have an account?
Sign Up!
Republican Budget Videos, Republican Budget Pictures, Republican Budget Articles
Boehner-Oboma on Republican Budget Plan
Boehner-Oboma on Republican Budget Plan
GOP Budget
Republican congressional leaders offer an alternative budget without any actual numbers. (Filmed Mar 26 when the show was called "Pop Cult")
Eternal Life
Eternal Life
Which Animals Are Republicans And Which Are Democrats
Dogs are Republicans, because 65% of all dogs are Marine Colonels, so they are very concerned about military budget cuts.
Bold Budget Move, Obama Calls for Downgrade from Walmart to Costco
Capitol Hill, Washington D.C. -- In an emergency, overnight meeting, President Obama made an official plea to the Republican party to downgrade government pu...
Budget Woes
Bunny and Thurston struggle to maintain their 1% lifestyle, despite the looming threat of another term for that Socialist in the White House.
5 items
HBOs GIRLS of SILICON VALLEY
Sex Education
How to Use the F Word
Blind Taste Test
Business Work: New Initiative
Government Shutdown: America's Closed
Since Democrats and Republicans can't seem to come to an agreement about our budget, the government is set to shut down a midnight, when America will officia...
HITLER hears that ROMNEY hates BIG BIRD !!!
Adolf was NOT HAPPY when he found out about Willard Romney's PBS budget cuts. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ DISCLAIMER: TheMotionDevo...
Chewing the Fat with Gov. Chris Christie: Avoiding Potholes
New Jersey's Governor, Republican - Chris Christie, is slashing the budget again. With heavy snow falls this past winter, plows and other traffic have left N...
VOTE NEWT (Parody of Cee-Lo Green's "Fuck You")
A celebratory anthem in honor of everyone's favorite jolly 2012 Republican candidate, NEWT GINGRICH! Let's hear it for NEWT!
Smackdown 08 McCain vs Obama episode 1
I started the "Presidential Debates" early. They don't discuss health care, balanced budgets, oil prices or abortion. I believe the important issues should b...
Evil Queens Romney/Ryan take down Snow White!
Snow White warning to all Tea-Partiers, Republicans and Conservative Americans, "Do not eat the apple! I repeat, step away from the Poisoned apple!"
TeaPartyMan - PRAY FOR FERGUSON (ORIGINAL SONG)
PRAY FOR FERGUSON (ORIGINAL SONG). THE TEA PARTY MAN is an AMERICAN PATRIOT who loves JESUS & AMERICA. He doesn't like BIG GOVERNMENT, TAXES, OR ILLEGAL ALIE...
Mitt Romney 2012: Conspiracy against Obama
Mitt Romney 2012: Conspiracy against Obama Jerry Corsi, the author of the anti-Obama bestseller "Where's the Birth Certificate ?", and other Mitt Romney's...
Mitt Romney/Dianna Ross - I'm coming OUT !
Mitt Romney has finally come out to the whole world of his true feelings ! He has actually come out of his closet ( Again )
Ryan/Romney-Kings of (US A)
Who will be KING !
Game Of Thrones Wiki: The Scott Walker
The Scott Walker
The Fixer Upper Brothers Fix The Debt Ceiling
The Fixer Upper Brothers put their expert skills to use helping out a power couple with their ceiling issues.
Chris Christie Announces He Will Run For President
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie announces that he will run for President after all. In this historic address at the Reagan Library, Christie lays out his ...
Austerity Santa
He ain't coming down the chimney, he prefers the back-door deal.
Whose Fault is the Default?
The GOP can't keep its story straight about the Debt Ceiling.
The Boston Way
Long before the current Tea Party Movement (Mar 2005) I wrote and recorded The original Tea Party Anthem but - It's not about Obama~
The blood sucking oil companies and Wall Street have done more damage to America than Osama Bin Laden ever did~


text:
Home > Software > Business, Financial, Legal
CSDC Ibank 4 (MAC)
Available for In-Store Pickup Only.
iBank 4 is an intuitive personal and small business financial manager designed to track bank accounts, credit cards, loans and investments, to analyze income and expenses with powerful reports, and to plan your financial future with easy budgeting tools. Wrapped in a familiar, Mac-like interface, iBank is a robust financial application able to meet the needs of both casual home users or sophisticated investors. iBank 4 offers many of the features not found in other Mac finance applications, such as password protection for your accounts; check printing; the ability to export data to standard formats for use with TurboTax or Quicken, or to to drag-and-drop tables to your favorite spreadsheet; advanced investment tracking of buys, sells, dividends and cost basis. iBank can directly connect to your bank to download transactions, or sync transactions entered on the go from iBank Mobile for iPhone and iPod touch (sold separately). Other features allow you to track mortgages or loans, see your account balances through time, create budgets and reports, attach images or files to transactions, sync items to iCal, backup automatically to MobileMe accounts, and much more. iBanks developers listen their customers, releasing frequent improvements, updates and fixes, and offering responsive tech support and customer service.
Product Information
Mfr Part#
Financial software
Personal Finance
Mac OS
Media Type
Supported Operating Systems
Supported Macintosh Operating Systems
Mac OSX 10.5 or later
System Requirements
Peripheral Devices/Software Required
CD-ROM Drive; Minimum screen resolution 1028 x 640
What's in the Box
What's in the Box
CD-ROM; Manual
Important Add-Ons
Questions and Answers
More Info
Warranty & Support
Vendor Support:
- Main Website: www.csdcsystems.com/
- Support Phone #: 888.661.1933
Micro Center Return Policy:
We guarantee your satisfaction on every product we sell with a full refund — and you won't even need a receipt.* We want you to be satisfied with your Micro Center purchase. However, if you need help or need to return an item, we're here for you!
If an item you have purchased from us is not working as expected, please visit one of our in-store Knowledge Experts for free help, where they can solve your problem or even exchange the item for a product that better suits your needs.
If you need to return an item, simply bring it back to any Micro Center store for a full refund or exchange.
*If you are a Micro Center Insider or if you have provided us with validated contact information (name, address, email address), you won't even need your receipt.
General Return Policy
Desktop / notebook computers, tablets, processors, motherboards, digital cameras, camcorders and projectors, 3D printers, 3D scanners, and CD/DVD duplicators may be returned within 15 days of purchase. All other products may be returned within 30 days of purchase. Merchandise must be in new condition, with original carton / UPC, and all packaging / accessories / materials. If you need to return software, a game or a movie, remember that you may not retain any copies — it's not legal, and it's not nice.
Wireless Phones & Devices
Wireless phones and devices may be returned within 14 days of purchase. When returning a wireless phone or device with a plan, you are responsible for ensuring that your service is cancelled with the carrier. If you don't cancel your service, you may incur additional charges from your carrier. All carrier charges are your responsibility.
Digital Downloads
All Digital Download sales are final and are not eligible for return or refund under the Micro Center Return Policy.
Using the software may require the use of a computer or other device that must meet minimum system requirements. It is recommended that you familiarize yourself with the system requirements before making your purchase. Software system requirements are typically found on the Product information specification page.
Aerial Drones
Micro Center is happy to honor its customary 30-day return policy for Aerial Drone returns due to product defect or customer dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, we cannot accept returns with damage due to pilot error. So let's be careful out there!
Refunds will be credited to the credit card or debit card account used for the original purchase.
Micro Center Support:
|Free Walk-in Tech Support
|As a service to our customers, Micro Center offers free in-store technical support. Stop in any of our store locations during regular business hours, and our expert staff will answer your computer questions or help you with issues regarding:
|Support from Home or Office
If you need help with hardware or software products purchased from Micro Center, please contact one of our knowledgeable tech support reps by live chat or email.
|Free assistance is available for the first 30 days on new purchases, excluding internal hardware installations or networking support. Your invoice reference number will be required for free assistance.
We accept the following credit cards: Micro Center VISA® credit card with WorldPoints® Rewards; VISA; MasterCard; American Express; Novus/Discover.
|Learn more about our exclusive Priority Care Program. You'll have access to our in-house Technical Support team of certified technology professionals trained to assist you on a variety of PC and Mac related support issues.


text:
The head coach was named as the new Red Devils manager in May, penning a three-year deal with the 13-time Premier League champions.
Moving to United) is not an option though. I will stay at Bayern Munich
Arjen Robben
Robben has been a vital part of Van Gaal's current Holland side which came third at the World Cup, scoring three goals and making one assist.
Despite his close working relationship with the new United manager, Robben rubbished reports that he is set to join the Red Devils.
"I have a special bond with him. He is the most important coach in my career," Robben said.
"(Moving to United) is not an option though. I will stay at Bayern Munich."
Robben scored 15 goals in 67 appearances for Chelsea during three Premier League seasons before moving to Real Madrid in 2007.
MORE: Get 12/1 on Man City to beat Juventus
MORE: Get £20 free when you bet £5 with Paddy Power
MORE: Robben: Van Gaal will be success at Man Utd