text:
Codex Alimentarius - Marilyn Vine asks:
Do you know what or who this organization is?
It is an organization that we should all know about. It is an organization that has been in existence since the 1960's and its aim has been to undermine the health of the people of the world by bringing in such restrictive legislation that individuals like you and me cannot make our own personal decisions as to whether we would like to take dietary supplementation to offset the lack of vitamins and minerals in our food and in the past few years have gone even further and won't allow food growers to promote the healthful aspects of any of our foods. Why would they do this? I believe that if you were "educated" and knew what your body required in the way of nutrition that you would make sure that you ate this food or took that particular mineral or vitamin.
Did you know that unless your body has the right mineral to act as a catalyst for a particular vitamin, you might as well not waste your time or money taking the vitamin! Most people concentrate on the vitamin side of their diets oblivious to the fact that the mineral is the basic requirement of your health.
All new information will be posted under this bookmark.
Bookmark this Codex Alimentarius page to see new information as it comes to hand.
GreenMedia on 12 January 2015 brings some good news on Codex Alimentarius. Here is an excerpt:
"Angelika Tritscher, the World Health Organization representative to Codex Alimentarius meetings, aptly posed a question to the Codex delegates assembled at a Food Contaminants meeting in Moscow in 2013, "How can we keep Codex relevant?" In posing this question, Dr. Tritscher quickly cut to the heart of the potential downfall of Codex. My response to Dr. Tritscher's question was, "If Codex wants to remain relevant to consumers, then it must create food standards that are truly healthy and make sense."
For more than five years now, the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) has been working on establishing daily Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) for essential vitamins and minerals. These NRVs would supposedly direct consumers as to healthy daily intake levels for vitamins and minerals such as Vitamins A, C, D and E, calcium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, and iron. But what the National Health Federation (NHF) found was that some Codex delegations led by Australia wanted to reduce virtually all of the recommended daily intake levels by significant percentages. The proposal for Vitamin C, for example, was to reduce its NRV from a miserable intake level of 60 milligrams per day down to an even more ridiculous one of 45 milligrams per day! Fortunately, with the help of Iraq, India, and the then-chairman Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, NHF was able to stop all advances in that direction at the 2009 committee meeting.
Since 2009, the Committee's work on NRVs has proceeded at a snail's pace year by year. However, at this year's meeting, the 36th session of the CCNFSDU, the Codex delegates advanced almost all of the so-called "Batch 2″ vitamins and minerals (Vitamin C, selenium, zinc, molybdenum, and manganese but not iron and fluoride) midway up the 8-step approval process. Meeting in Bali, Indonesia during the entire Thanksgiving week of November 2014, the Codex delegates also deliberated further refinements to the wording of the "General Principles for the Addition of Essential Nutrients to Foods" as well as the necessity of Follow-up Formula for infants."
Click this link to read the full article.
My understanding of Codex Alimentarius is that this is the last thing that they wish to happen. In fact in my opinion they go out of their way to make sure that the average Joe Blow cannot buy vitamins and minerals at a level that will maintain their health.
Now Orthomolecular Medicine is providing ample evidence of what I term "stupidity" that is taking place around the world and which we seem to be powerless to stop UNLESS enough people get jack of these so called health groups (Codex Alimentarius) supposedly looking after our welfare and take control back of our own lives. There are many people who won't care about this BUT THERE ARE EVEN MORE WHO DO CARE AND WHO DO WISH TO LEAD HEALTHY LIVES. Please take the time to read Andrew Saul's article dated 21 November 2014 In the meantime take a look at this example:
Green Media on 5 November 2014 brings a rather disturbing article. The following are excerpts and it is recommended that the full article be read to understand what is unfolding.
"Sadly, fluoride is up for consideration to receive an NRV. Most likely, it will not receive an NRV in this Codex committee; but Fluoride will be reviewed for assignment of an NRV for Non-Communicable Diseases by a Working Group that the United States is working on. NHF will continue to follow this issue as our documented position has always been that Fluoride is toxic at any of the levels and for any of the purposes being considered by Codex.
As an accredited INGO at Codex, NHF participates in the electronic Working Group (eWG) for special dietary foods like infant and follow-up formula (FUF). FUF is designed for children from 6-36 months when transitioning from breast milk to a regular diet. Codex is concerned with wasting and malnutrition and these formulations are supposed to prevent both. Others have expressed the opinion, also noted in the Codex record, that FUF is primarily related to creating a market for a product targeting a certain demographic and that it is unnecessary. NHF agrees.
During the call, NHF made the comment, noted in the record, that NHF does not only feel that follow-up formula is unnecessary but that it is actually harmful, as the first ingredients listed are GMO ingredients such as corn, corn syrup, corn maltodextrin, and soy and/or soybean oil depending upon whether the FUF is milk-based or soy-based. Of course there are other problems with FUF, but today's focus was on GMO and the fact it is not needed and is actually harmful."
Click this link to read the full article and also see the ingredients in the Nestle® version of FUF. I was upset to see that it contained just these first few ingredients:
reading I have done on skim milk powder is that it stands every chance of being
rancid. The corn products – so much
information on the impact of GMO corn products – Palmolein I know nothing about
– soy or soy products I would not touch with a barge pole let alone give it to my baby!
On 15 July 2013 we hear that Codex Alimentarius celebrates its 50th Anniversary.
How do they celebrate? Well what else of course!
Please take the time to read what they are up to now. So many essential nutrients have had their daily intake requirement downgraded.
One very important vitamin, Vitamin D, has been downgraded by FIFTY PERCENT!
Because of the very successful campaigns that have been run world-wide by governmental and world health organisations with regards to cancer and the need to use sunscreens to avoid the sun, we now have a world of people deficient in Vitamin D! If you don't understand the importance of just this vitamin alone then click this link to learn more.
If you read the article below you will see a nutritional therapist's comments on the methylation factors and then if you read the latest attack you will see that the B Vitamins have also had a further reduction!
If each year they keep on reducing the daily required amounts – eventually we will be told that our bodies don't need any nutritional assistance whatsoever!
Further down the page you will read "Dr Gregory Damato, PhD in an article published as long ago as October-November 2008, Vol 15, No 6 Nexus Magazine said "Billions of people will suffer from degenerative diseases due to poor nutrition and limited access to health supplements if the powerful global corporations behind the new Codex Alimentarius standards are allowed to "harmonise" the world."
Nothing has changed! It is just getting worse.
Please find update information on the meeting held in Bad Soden, Germany in the first week of December 2013.
Here is an excerpt from a nutritional therapist's standpoint:
"… several of the nutrients that were placed on Codex's sacrificial altar were methylation factors. B6, B12, Folic Acid…If we don't methylate well, we can develop opportunistic diseases. Cancer…heart attack that occurs when Homocysteine elevates…Some, like calcium, which Codex wished to elevate out of proportion to stabilizing magnesium, and when taken out of balance, creates disease as well by mineralizing in soft tissue like blood vessels instead of the bone and teeth. So, at this point I'm thinking, "Is Codex out to kill us?"
That is a very good question and I believe that the answer is probably "yes"!
"So many of the final decisions made by Codex equal ill health for the World. It means both Big Pharma and the so-called "health" care system profits, while we grow ill and die. It is no secret that depopulation is one aspect of the World's agenda. "Dr. Henry Kissinger himself wrote: "Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World." Apparently America is the new 'third World.'"
If you wish to keep your health and the health of your children then these are must read articles.
Bad Soden, Germany December 2012
Further information on Bad Soden, Germany
1994 Requirement
On 27 November 2012 Prevent Disease brings us an article on what is to occur in the Netherlands on 14 December 2012. They also explain that Codex Alimentarius (commonly just referred to as Codex) is:
"a subsidiary body of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and the World Health Organization (WHO). Codex develops international food safety and quality standards, such as standards concerning the safety of food additives. Standards set by Codex traditionally served as a minimum floor for less developed countries. It has over 170 member countries within the framework including the EU and US which have participated in Codex for decades."
many people believe that the United Nations and the World Health Organization
are such wonderful international bodies and do so much good. All I can do is urge you to take the
blinkers off and really have a look at what they do. Maybe you would like to do a google search
on "United Nations + Agenda 21" and seek out their legislation in this
regard. In the meantime see what they are up to on 14 December 2012.
Billions of people will suffer from degenerative diseases due to poor nutrition and limited access to health supplements if the powerful global corporations behind the new Codex Alimentarius standards are allowed to "harmonise" the world.
Dr Gregory Damato, PhD has given Marilyn Vine permission to print his entire article that was published in Nexus Magazine, October-November 2008, Vol 15, No 6.
The information contained in this article is so appalling that Marilyn Vine felt compelled to write to Greg and put this article out to as many people around the world as she was able to. PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS ARTICLE – YOUR LIFE COULD DEPEND ON IT! Currently only a handful of people world-wide know anything about Codex Alimentarius. Marilyn has been following Codex Alimentarius since 1998 when she first became aware of the European Union's involvement.
Greg's article contains information:
At the end of the article advice is given by Greg as to whom you can contact in your part of the world to protest about the intentions of world governments.
The only way to avoid the death-for profit agenda is to fight back by disseminating knowledge to everyone you know.
It does not matter whether they are still asleep or hypnotised by the enslavement of daily life or too busy to pay attention: the time to wake up is now.
The US government and the collaborating media have been trying to distract the world while all these egregious and mandatory standards are covertly passed.
It is time to take action, and you can do so by going to the website of the Natural Solutions Foundation and following the latest updates on Codex.
It is very important that swift and vociferous action be taken now. Times are changing very rapidly, and unless we all come together on this issue we may have to start thinking about growing our own food in the near future to avoid calculated extermination.
Australia - You can send an email to the Department of Agriculture and Food in Western Australia or the Minister for Agriculture in your respective state. For example, in WA the email address is firstname.lastname@example.com. The Therapeutic Goods Administration can also be contacted online via its website.
New Zealand - You can use the NZ Health Trust's website to send your comments to your Member of Parliament:
United Kingdom - Emails can be sent to the Food Standards Agency, which represents the UK at Codex sessions. Contact: Michelle McQuillan by email at firstname.lastname@example.com.
The address for the US Codex is:
US Department of Agriculture,
South Building, Room 4861,
1400 Independence Ave, SW,
Washington, DC 20250,
phone (202) 205 7760,
fax (202) 720 3157,
email firstname.lastname@example.com.
The US Codex official website -
Other Countries - The best way to have your voice heard is to determine who your local Codex Alimentarius representatives are and contact them with a unified and vociferous stand. This can be done easily through various online search engines.
Return Codex Alimentarius to Home Page


text:
Personal Campaign
James is gathering 10 signatures to
Remove Animal Hate From Facebook
Well to me if you hate animals being on Facebook is the last place I want YOU TO BE. Young minds are learning from the internet most of the so I SAY keep them and all hate groups off of Facebook. Let's teach our young people about love,honor,respect for one's self but most of all. We are all GOD'S children non of us have the right to harm one of GOD'S children. Bible says so.
James's progress
1 signed
10 James's goal

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Jul 8 2013, 2:28pm CDT | by Luigi Lugmayr
Amanda Bynes has lashed out at the President and First Lady of the United States.
The troubled former actress - who has worried friends and family with a series of bizarre antics including disturbing tweets and legal troubles - insulted Barack and Michelle Obama in a new Twitter post, where she called them "ugly".
She wrote: "Barack Obama and Michelle Obama are ugly!"
However, the couple are not the only high profile victims of 27-year-old Amanda's wrath, last month, in a post on the micro-blogging site, which has since been deleted, Amanda also called Zac Efron ugly.
She wrote: "@ZacEfron has an ugly face (sic)."
Other celebrities to face Amanda's ire include Rihanna as she claimed Chris Brown assaulted his then girlfriend in 2009 because she wasn't pretty enough.
Amanda tweeted: "Chris Brown beat you because you're not pretty enough," before adding: "@Rihanna no one wants to be your lover so you call everyone and their mother that I almost named my new dog Rihanna (sic)."
She also lashed out at Rihanna's ex Drake, calling him "ugly", despite previously opening up about her crush on him.
Amanda said: "Drake has the ugliest smile, ugly gums uneven teeth ugly eyes," before deleting the tweet.
However, she later took to her Twitter account to add: "I won't deny calling @drake ugly," before appearing to regret her tweets.
She wrote: "I'm sorry about the tweets I said about @drake I didn't mean what I said. I hope to become friends with him instead of smashing him!"
Source: Bang Showbiz
Luigi Lugmayr
Luigi is the founding Chief Editor of I4U News and brings over 15 years experience in the technology field to the ever evolving and exciting world of gadgets. He started I4U News back in 2000 and evolved it into vibrant technology magazine.
Luigi can be contacted directly at email@example.com. Luigi posts regularly on LuigiMe.com about his experience running I4U.
blog comments powered by Disqus


text:
My Nonprofit Reviews
Sue Flannery
Review for Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc, San Angelo, TX, USA
How I initially heard about PVDR, I don't recall. As a manager and as a business owner I was very impressed with what Mark Meyers had achieved in only 3 years. He had to have had a business background. Because I wanted to know more I emailed him, and he responded. He did formerly own his own business. I went to Charity Navigator and found nothing at all , but I was so impressed with his results that I became a donor.
Since that time several years ago, I continue to be amazed at Mark and Amy's passion, zeal, and dedication to donkeys. Even the children are dedicated to the donkeys. I continue to be impressed by Mark's leadership and entrepreneurial skills as he has developed and defined new ways to find homes for adoptable donkeys through his satellite programs and the ways in which he has found to care for donkeys as economically as possible.
The man thinks, and he produces extraordinary results. I have worked with dogs and with horses and understand the level of commitment that he has. Animals are 24/7 physically and emotionally hard work. I wish that I could find PVDR some huge donors, people with a large capacity for charities, to help Mark and Amy financially to endow their work for the future.
While I personally donate to about 5 charities, PVDR is the only one that gets an automatic check every single month. I only wish it could be more. And now I see that PVDR is included in Charity Navigator ratings and is improving its financials each year.
For the Meyers family, PVDR is all about love in the highest sense of the word. I hope that everyone reading my review will dig deep into their pockets and help PVDR reach its goals.


text:
Politics Counts
Foreign Policy
It's good practice sparing for Romney. Obama will punch a lot harder than that.
Is there *anything* Gingrich won't say? Last night I heard him intone that if elected, he would give us his life, his fortune and his sacred honor. I think he should hold on to what's left of his honor.
He put it in a thimble, but now he can't find it...
What the poor really need is a trampoline to spring up. Up up and away to my new space colony on the moon so they can have enough people to be a state!
Does anyone take what this guy says seriously anymore?
I would like to hear Mr. Gingrich talk about his assessments of where this country stands now, key points he sees as to how we got here and what he sees, by priority, as his marching orders if he becomes President. So much energy has been diverted to fending off $15,000,000 worth of craziness from Mr. Romney that I have lost sight of who Mr. Gingrich is - the one I thought I knew before Florida.
I don't want to hear platitudes of grand schemes like the moon (even if I happen to like that idea). I want to hear Mr. Gingrich focus on the national issues at hand. If he is bombarded again by negativity from Mr. Romney, I hope he let's it be the statement it is about Mr. Romney's character and he sticks with addressing the nation's issues rather than going on the defensive. That's who I want to vote for. Someone who appreciates where my country is right now and who isn't afraid to put forth a concrete plan. I also want someone who can build a coalition between parties and I think Mr. Gingrich would be much better at that than Mr. Romney. I think that Mr. Romney, just as he displayed in FL, will pitch a major hissy fit and attack anyone in DC that doesn't go along with his plan if he becomes President. This is too similar to what has been grid-locking D.C. for 3 years.
I hope Mr. Gingrich finds his pre-FL self and shines again through November.
@ Nancy
Mitt is not stubborn but the ultimate pragmatist. Romney attacked Gingrich in Flordia for one reason, because it's what he needed to do to win. Romney's attacks are not personal. If he needs to work with the other side to get things done in Washington, that is what he will do. Your analysis is interesting because I think most people fear the opposite, that Mitt has no core convictions and would be all too willing to work with the other side and cede conservative ground, whereas Newt is generally viewed as a stuborn emotional man who is not above throwing hissy fits if he doesn't get his way.
Oh and let's get one thing straight, when it comes to character, Romney looks wayyy better compared to Newt (of course, 99% of the country probably looks better than that Newt in that dept)
I was surprised when Newt attacked the top 1%, but I guess it was inevitable that he'd end up campaigning for the bottom 1%. That's about how much of the Republican vote he'll get if he keeps this up.
Newt is managed to morph himself from a positive, energetic and inspirational leader into a despicable, bitter and vindictive old man. The transformation from beauty to the beast is very sad. The only thing that'll keep Newt from dropping out early (he'll fail ultimately anyway) is his gigantic ego. In fact, he'll be left with a shattered ego, deep debt, and having squandered any goodwill he created over his 40 years as a politician.
Newt is promising a chicken in every pot. I think he can take his mask off now. We all know he's not the party nor the anti-establishment candidate. Given his way he'll find some way of earmarking his way to the Presidency. Same old, same old. No focus. All mustard and no dog.
Mr. Gingrich, for instance, often says those receiving unemployment assistance should have to enroll in business training programs.======== And just who is going to manage and pay for this massive undertaking????
Gingrich offers a bold vision for America as compared to Romney who is a silver spooned country club Republican.
If you believe that our 2-party political system is thoroughly corrupt ... then a populist message is the correct message !
It's We The People vs our corrupt establishment political parties !
Gingrich is striking the correct tone !
Numerically speaking ... a conservative populist message will crush the establishment ... and that's why they are fighting for their political lives.
The day that the Tea Party and OWS recognize that they share some fundamental agreements ... the people will defeat America's self-anointed ruling class.
I'm with Gingrich ... and against the establishment ... and their hand picked candidate, Mitt Romney.
The only reason he's staying in this run is because he knows it's the last thing he'll do. Sad.
i would like to address mr. grinchrich as to why people respect and listen to donald trump. he, like romney, is the perfect example of capitalism and how you can become successful if you have the ability, brains and acumen to do so. he is a success story and every success story should be congratulated and used as an example for all.
I'm sure he promised them everything they wanted as well. He seems to be good at it.
Hey-hey-hey! Goodbye!
Phil Mc is 100% right
It is amazing that you and others can actually believe that Romney is the establishment guy. Especially when you look at where Gingrich has come from. Gingrich has spend decades in congress while Romney has been a successful capitalist. Romney is no more an establishment candidate than Reagan was a communist.
Trump endorsing Mitt is like a circus clown endorsing the guy who scoops up the elephant dung after each performance. And for Newt, he's not even part of the big top. I suggest you check the side show freaks. I like Rick but he will probably have to wait another four years for his turn at being the ringmaster...
remind me again why exactly conservatives are going for Gingrich over Romney?
Newt, want to speak about what American truly cares about? Tell us you will deport every foreign national illegally in the United States... (yes depressing wages and taking American Jobs). Tell us Newt that you will suspend and put a moratorium on LEGAL immigrants coming into the country. (Over a million a year taking jobs that could go to your countrymen.) Tell us you will kick off of welfare those who never contributed and who has never worked a day in their life...THAT WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE POOR! What about it Newt...do you really care?
Want to be a populist, Newt?
Start talking about how The Ruling Class keeps raising the "FRAUD CEILING" in D.C. and protecting The Usurper-In-Thief - http://www.BirtherReport.com
I have not figured out how to get enough water to the Moon Colony of 13,000 people but I have figured out how to get enough hot air there. Most of you have figured that out also so we may have split that portion of Mr. G's prize.
Hey Newt,
Trying to re-envent yourself won't work - we all know who you are.
You blow with the wind and do not have any core values except loving Newt.
You have never even operated a lemonade stand
You have been a inside political hack you whole adult life.
You can fool some of the people some of the time
but you can't fool all the people all the time
and for sh-t sure you don't fool me!
How Ahern Rentals Landed in Bankruptcy
Although Ahern Rentals' shaky financials have led to a greater separation between the companies, the recession has left fewer telehandler manufacturers still standing—a good position for Xtreme
Newt can out Obama than Obama.
Anybody who knows or has watched Donald Trump knows that there was no way Trump could support Gingrich. If Gingrich were in the board room and told Trump that his entire team quit in mass, he doesn't need consultants anyway, is so unprepared with poor ground game that he's been left off several states ballots but sued to get back on and to get Florida to have proportional delegates because he lost the primary, whined that Romney had more money so he was getting beat up over the air waves, called people liars and dishonest, and had two bad debates in a row because his debate prep was drinking a diet coke and talking to his two grandkids....Trump would say to him what he said today...."YOUR FIRED!"
The goofy Newt needs to quit while behind. All of you Newtbies will eventually be saying how great the Mormon guy is. Anyway, Ron Paul is the ONLY conservative out there...the rest go home!
The things described in this article as "populist" are not; they are conservative. Is anything to the right of Mitt Romney now considered "populist"? If so, there are a ton of us populists out there.
Why doesn't anyone talk about the fact that Newt and Rick are not even in the running for over 500 delegates in the states they are not even allowed on the ballot on? It is a 2 man race. The status quo mittens vs. the last hope to save the titanic RonPaul2012.com!
And Ron Paul has NO chance of ever winning in his lifetime. It's funny to hear and see the knuckleheads who support Paul try and convince themselves that a person who is dead last is in the lead somehow. Go figure. Newt is our only hope... unless you want to see Romney get hammered in a debate and ultimately LOSE the election and hand OBAMA another 4 years. All of you who support Ron Paul should rethink what your throw-away vote will do. We cannot afford another 4 years of OBAMA.
Newt got the Workfare program passed into law, after Clinton vetoed it several times and finally signed it, putting Welfare recipients into jobtraining programmes and off of the welfare rolls. The way out of poverty is to get them into a better paying jobs.
@JKF in NYC - Newt was quoting George Washington you moron. GEEZ....any comments from NYC are liberal bloggers. GEt out of your Mom's basement will ya and get a JOB.
Better to be endorsed by Trump than by Herman Cain!
This is terrible news! http://newtgingrichbassethounds.tumblr.com/
Gingrich should leave the populist rhetoric to someone like Ron Paul, who is actually believable. Gingrich comes off sounding like he belongs at an Occupy Wall Street rally.
Why does it seem like election 2012 is going to be an extreme letdown? I mean, when you consider all of the cadidates involved: Obama, Gingrich, Romney, etc. -- we don't have much choice. Is this the best that we can do as a nation? Geez.
Newt is nowhere neat our only hope. Newt is just as moderate as Romney, with his support of Romney care and insinuating multiple times that the government healthcare mandate should be on a federal level. Not only that but since you are a gun "wacko" maybe you should read up on Newts idea in 2007 to have all registered gun owners to have biometric identity cards to know where they are at any time. As far as the debates are concerned Newt lost to Romney in the last two. The only reason Newt did anything in the one before that is people who were cheering for him were completely ignorant when he attcked someone for asking about his character. CHARACTER is important when running for president unfortunately for Newt
Gingrich is Gagrene to the GOP. This Narcissist fool will play any role to get notoriety, like pose with the she-devil Pelosi.
Just like Romney predicted, Gingrich will say anything, anytime and anywhere to get elected...sad and pathetic!
Sorry Newt, I guess Trump doesn't want a new hotel on your moon colony.
John said:john wrote :
The goofy Newt needs to quit while behind. All of you Newtbies will eventually be saying how great the Mormon guy is. Anyway, Ron Paul is the ONLY conservative out there…the rest go home!
Dear John, if the issue is Mitts religion I suggest you become an intolerant Moslem...No wonder Ron Paul can never win, his supporters are religious bigots.
Why would any repiblican in his/her right mind ever vote for someone who supported Tsongas, who was a socialist. If Romney gets nominated, Obummer will be licking his chops and Romney will be STEAMROLLED, becasue Obama will run TO THE RIGHT of Romney. Newt is the only hope for saving this country.
You will vote for who WE TELL YOU to vote for!
Washington needs what they don't want.
We can agree on one thing. You won't vote for Newt and I won't for Romney.
Sorry Newt, it's going to take more than your silly populist rhetoric to convince me that you are worthy of the White House. You and your sleazy wife can crawl back into the hole you crawled out of. You are both disgusting examples of morality and fidelity in marriage!
The Republican side is doing so good. Keep eating each other up. No matter how bad you think Obama is you are paving the way to his 2012 victory.
Let me tell you what I know about Romney. He came into the Winter Olympic which were way over budget and up to their ears in scandal. They figured they wouldn't even break even. I thought SLC would be in gridlock for two months during the games. He came in, took over, assessed the problems and took on not only the games as we used to know it but a huge security challenge as it was right after 911. He organized, delegated, and turned it around, and everyone that worked with him loved him. We came out making hundreds of millions instead of going broke, and unless you were going to an event, you hardly knew the games were going on as he had organized transportation and security so well. Bob Costas was once asked of all the Olympics he has covered which one was best. With out hesitating a moment he said SLC They were the niceest and best organized of any that he had covered. I read his bio on Wikipedia and they guy is a genius. His BaTin Capital model is one that is copied and taught at Harvard Business school. Why he doesn't let people know all of his accolades, I don't know. Maybe his humble Christian background, it is just not his nature. He has been successful at everything he has done. Trump may be controversial but he is not stupid, and anyone calling him dumb, I would love to see your portfolio. The country is in peril and Newt doesn't have a clue about jobs and how the economy works, except for him to take a quick buck where ever he can. He has no morals and no ethics. Romney is a good man, and is the only one who can do the job we need done.
Just like John Edwards went populist in 2008.
The establishment certainly does not want Romney to win. Otherwise, why would insiders like Gingrich and Santorum stay in the race, and continue to bash Romney? If the establishment wanted Romney to win, Gingrich and Santorum would step aside rather than continue to beat up on Romney before he goes up against ObaMao.
McGruff wrote :
I'm with Gingrich … and against the establishment … and their hand picked candidate, Mitt Romney.
Then you will be to blame for putting the worst American president ever back in office. We need a healer and another narcissist is not the answer. It will take time and patience to heal the serious wounds this president and his radical apointees and congressional lemmings have inflicted, not just flambouyant rhetoric. Perhaps McGruff is a liberal in disguise?
Ronmey tried to lead the people of Mass out of the quagmire the looney liberals created, so don't punish him for that. And Gingrich posing with Nasty Palousey - was just a mistake? Is that something YOU would do too? Would posing with Hitler just be a simple mistake? And if this is just about religion, your GOD is intolerant of other Christians.
Why would any repiblican in his/her right mind ever vote for someone who supported Tsongas, who was a socialist - I am voting for Romney - the same way I voted for a Republican who USED TO BE A DEMOCRAT - Remember Ronald Reagan? ForPete's sake Tsongas has been Dead for 15 years - time to get over it. By the way take a look at Romney's Wikipedia bio and tell me that he's not Presidential timber
Did you say POOPULAR? This guy is full of it..
MItt Romney is backed by Wall Street. Mitt Romney believes in the man made global warming hoax. MItt Romney agrees with Obama signing the NDAA Bill which allows the executive branch to order the military into our cities and neighborhoods. To round up U.S. citizens and hold them indefinitely without charge. Are you a threat to the govt? Nancy Pelosi calls the Tea Party "Nazis". Is supporting a 3rd party candidate a threat to the two party dictatorship? It may surprise you what the career politicians think who is a threat.
Newt has a mucho better understanding of what it is to be an American and how we are different than any other nation in history. The government controlled Democrat news media and the establishment Repubs like to point out the huge win that Mitt Romney got in Florida, while now completely ignoring Newts equally impress win in So. Carolina. Romney only has 84 delegates and Newt 36. They need 1244. we are a LONG WAY from declaring any nominee yet and Newt may have learned a thing or two from Florida. Romney seems to be suffering from Foot in Mouth like Obama, with incomplete statements or poorly worded ones. GO NEWT
I'll vote Newt based on the fact that this Assclown Trump. No, Trumpy.... You're fired..
The absolute stupidity of people voting for Romney. He's backed by the establishment and the Wall Street bankers you knuckleheads. WAKE UP! Socialist and New World Order Globalist George Soros was quoted two days ago saying it does not matter who wins between Obama and Romney, "They're one in the same". WAKE UP!
This race ended in Florida. Gingrich has to win one of the next four primary's to stay competitive, and by all indications it's looking like he definitely won't. Far right "conservatives" will yell and scream all they want, but this race is done. Gingrich is doing nothing but harming his own image by continuing on.
This race ended in Florida. Gingrich has to win one of the next four primary's to stay competitive, and by all indications it's looking like he definitely won't. Far right "conservatives" will yell and scream all they want, but this race is done. Gingrich is doing nothing but harming his own image by continuing on.
Nobody is excited about Romney as a candidate -- his support is tepid at best.
Romney comes across as the candidate for the 1% and nobody else. He might as well run on a "I got mine, now you get yours" platform.
Iguess voting for Tsonges; instituting a state mandated insurance for everyone; and getting an endorsement from Trump makes one a conservative republican in todays world.
Attended a meeting conducted by an investment advisor a few years back and in reply to a question about venture capitalists he jokingly defined them as "vulture" capitalists; they spot their somewhat wounded prey, sweep in and picked the prey's bones clean, and depart leaving the bones to rot away or be picked up by some other passing critter.
I have pledged to be ABO but after discussion a couple days ago on a blog, I guess a write-in fulfills my pledge.
Oh, I am an independent, as of May 31, 2008 when the democratic party left me by changing its rules which the republican party may also be trying to do, if infact it decided that any primary before April was to be proportional and then does not follow through on that requirement. That along with the republican party establishment trying to tell me who the republican candidate reminds me a great deal of the democratic party in 2008. Write-in appears the only way many of us can vote for our candidate.
Mitt versus Newt: Tinky Holloway versus Cuffy Meigs.
Chiefvizier wrote :
Why would any repiblican in his/her right mind ever vote for someone who supported Tsongas, who was a socialist. If Romney gets nominated, Obummer will be licking his chops and Romney will be STEAMROLLED, becasue Obama will run TO THE RIGHT of Romney. Newt is the only hope for saving this country.
And what woukd you call someone who posed with Nasty Palousy? Ohh..I see..an honest mistake, like posing with Dracula's mom Would u pose with the "lady". ?
Like our president, Newt is just another narsissist who do whatever irttakes to visible.
And who is Tsongas and who cares.
Newt tried to censor the Internet after saying how important the Constitution was to him. He then supported one of the fannie/freddie programs after saying how bad welfare was for the country. Typical, two-faced politician. BUT at least he is NOT obama.
Who the hell did this fat bastard ever hire?
Newt never said his anty-conservative escapades with Pelosi and Kennedy were mistakes...but we remember
All you need to know to vote against Romney. If he could steal 50 million taxpayer dollars from the outside, imagine what he could do from the inside. Wall St has noticed and are writing big checks.
I got news for you guys: being a conservative is nothing to be proud of. Claiming to be one is like skinheads trying to rationalize their support for white power.
Honestly, Newt has all the appearance of a Daddy Warbucks with an obesity problem. He panders in a pig stye and has no shame. If it were not for his beautiful wife, Clitoristuh, he would be a broken and worthless man. Luckily they have an open marriage and Clitoristuh can find satisfaction from other than a morbidly obese, foul smelling, sweat hog, huffing and puffing over her. Besides, who even thinks that Newt will live long enough to make it through a first term.
Ron Paul Has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget nor ever taken a taxpayer funded junket.He RETURNS a portion of his congressional budget every year and has REFUSED to participate in the Lucrative House/Senate Pension Program like Newt & Obama have done.
Actions speak louder than words. Ron Paul is a Conservative IN ACTION.
Voting for the lesser of 2 evils is still voting for EVIL. I don't want to have to Splain that to the Man upstairs.
And what is wrong with Socialism and New World Order Globalism? They take on a negative meaning only when compared to American exceptionalism, and we ain't.
Ron Paul SUPPORTED discrimination and is AGAINST same-sex marriage. Ron Paul is a weirdo IN FACT.
Sad that CNN feels objective reporting is to take statements out of context to try and sway public opinion. And Gingrich took up the call of the working man?!?! While some may be in the pool of the bottom five percent of Americans due to circumstances beyond their control, there are a number of folks in that position because they are unwilling to do anything to help themselves out of it, i.e. work. I personally don't feel too bad for the bottom 5% of Americans either. They are doing worlds better than millions of poor in other nations who don't have the safety nets that they receive by virtue of being born within our borders.
Cyrus wrote :
.Just like Romney predicted, Gingrich will say anything, anytime and anywhere to get elected…sad and pathetic
You mean the pro-choice errr pro-life,luv romneycare errr repeal obamacare,dont care about the poor errrr wait a minute i do care about the poor....romney sounds like the one who would say anything to get elected.
I think it's hilarious how ultra-conservatives who hate Romney are hanging on to Gingrich as their last hope at "anybody but Romney". The guy did a global warming commercial with Pelosi for crying out loud! He's on his third marriage...both of the previous two eneded by infidelity. He lobbied for Fannie and Freddie (regardless if you want to call it something else). Now he's whining about the rules in the Florida primary although you know he wouldn't be making a peep if he had won. He's a real champion of conservative values...ha!
Amy, why don't you try reading and thinking for yourself? Ron Paul does not support discrimination...he supports liberty...plain and simple. Regarding same sex marriage, he has repeatedly stated that the government should not be involved in marriage. Go educate yourself and stop spreading lies.
I think newt is jealous that the Republican surge and huge takeback of Congressional seats occured without
him. The Repubs are posed to take it all back in 2012 and he hates the fact that it is all happening with him(Newt), on the sidelines. Hey if anything positive happens for the Republican party Newt has to be there to take ALL the credit.
Chuck wrote :
The absolute stupidity of people voting for Romney. He's backed by the establishment and the Wall Street bankers you knuckleheads. WAKE UP! Socialist and New World Order Globalist George Soros was quoted two days ago saying it does not matter who wins between Obama and Romney, "They're one in the same". WAKE UP!
Are you foolish enough to believe what that gnome Soros says? That is precisely a reaspn to vote for Mitt..
Poor misinformed Amy, Open your eyes, stop allowing CNN, Fox, MSNBC, or any of the other choose your candidate for you. There is only one who speaks the truth, 100% of the time. He's been saying the same thing for over 30 years. I challenge you this, go find a book about Austrian Economics and read it, I just might open your eyes.
Romney is the only member of the GOP currently running that can win the election from Obama. The others are just not electable as they are either too far right or too far off base as far as international issues are concerned.
I hope the folks get behind Romney once he has won enough primaries to convince everyone that he really is going to be the GOP candidate.
Romney is the only GOP candidate that Independents will vote for!!
Amy - I know of no one who objcts to showing disappointment that same sex anything is to be valued, unless its buddys in sport, friendship, cameraderie, and warrior disposition. Sleeping together, prison romance, or any social remonstration reserved for opposite genders brings only disgust and the feeling that all is not well in the universe. That is known as instinct, common sense and feelings based on evolutionary outcomes. Your attitude is not appreciated in most civilized circles.
Gingrich claims that he is for the working man. What a Joke. Everyone seems to have forgotten when he joined Clinton in the 90s to buy enough votes with billions of tax payer funds and pass Gatt ll. They did this
by going around to congres men and asking what it would cost to get their vote then paying for their states
pet projects. They sold out this country and the working man. Millions of middle income jobs went to China
along with most of our manufacturing base and a trade defict between 2 and 4 hundred billion a year.
Every time i hear Gingrich say he is a Reagan republican i want to throw up because he was not fit to polish Mr. Reagans shoes. Both Clinton and Gingrich are traitors to this country and the working man.
Why would I vote for Romneycare/Obamacare. Presdient Reagan must be rolling over in his grave putting a liberal candidate as a top tier to represent the Republican Party. Yes, I think this time you established repubs are destroying the party. The fear of Obama will not work because the base will not be there for you. The base doesn't want liberal I have to pretend to be a conservative Romney. Obama will win. Congrats, Obama.
Go Newt! We love you!
Just who is Newt really working for? After all did he not team up with Pelosi a few years ago to battle climate change?
A fat, Michlien Man, Pillsbury Doughboy once ran for president of America on pure meanness and his ego. He didn't know if he was conservative or liberal (he's a closet liberal) and every time he spoke, he proved what a fool he was. He ran on morality, which was strange, considering he cheated on two wives and the public is waiting for him to cheat on the third. There are rumors that this fat politician is Michael Moore's twin and that they were separated at birth, but that's only speculation. The fat politician was most remembered for having a hissy-fit each time he lost. And, he lost, and lost, and lost.
Just what is Newt trying to prove? It is not for the good of the USA
The term "Populist" may be a bit confusing to Texans (no, not everything is). Its just that our agrarian communist People's Party deems itself Populist.. Evolviing from the Grange movement, it wants more welfare benefits for the farmers and more social control across the board. Inveighing against all things traditional and American, it is not particularly Popular in Texas.
it's unbelievable to me that after all of this sharade and the sharade in florida nevadans will also follow suit and only 7 or 8 percent vote for ron paul
Mitt said "I like being able to fire people".
He didn't mean he enjoyed firing them; he meant that it is a good option to be able to fire incompetent people and lay off unneeded people in order to keep a business IN business, employing other people who are competent and needed. The auto industry could not "fire people" because of the unions and as a result they have gone into almost total eclipse. The government will not lay people off once again because of unions and as a result the government is eating the American taxpayer alive.
Mitt is right.
Poor Newt grasping at straws.
At least he can stay in a suite at benefactor Sheldon Adelson's Venetian while he is in Nevada pretending to fight for the working people.
I would not characterize Gingrich as "losing" in FL so much as falling victim to some STUPID rules the state RC has managed to set in place. I'll find a way to hang the little weasel bastard running the FL RC one day...soon.
Newt, you've got no future as a candidate. Time to find a staffer to hump.
Trump's endorsement of Mitt Romney shows absolutely no leadership or any particular integrity. It simply means he's a pragmatist, and a businessman, and he believes Romney will win and he wants to protect his financial empire. He is not, after all, the Oracle of Delphi! He knows that Newt will shake things up in Washington and he probably feels he has little to no leverage with him. After all, Trump supported Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer, et al. It's called paying ' protection money.' Romney claims he voted as a progressive because he was running for office in a liberal state. Hasn't anyone noticed, then, that he did not bring his conservative credentials to Massachusetts and convert them to his way? Instead Massachusetts, iapparently was more successful in converting Romney, that is if he ever had a conservative bone in his body from the beginning. Hate him if you will, but I would not underestimate Newt.
Mittens "Electable" Romney is a younger version of John "Electable" McCain. Anytime you hear "Electable" attached to a Republican candidates name, RUN!!!!!
Mittens "Electable" Romney is a younger version of John "Electable" McCain. Anytime you hear "Electable" attached to a Republican candidates name, RUN!!!!!
What about the stash of cash that Romney has hidden in the Cayman Islands?
Buh, bye Newt.
@John if it were hidden how do we know about it numb nuts?
Remember in 2004, the democrat establishment told their voters, don't elect Howard Dean, he's unelectable, go with the safe choice John Kerry if you want to get rid of Bush... In 2004 the democrat voters hated George Bush soooooo much they abandonned ideology for electability.... Mr electable, John Kerry, was painted as a serial flip flipper who had no moral compass..... Sound familiar about the 2012 race?
The establishment wants us to choose the safe electable candidate, who happens to be a serial flip flopper
jakes68 (8:49p.m.,Feb.2,'12) wants Newt to pitch a tent in the park and promise when President to open up the White House and Congress' meeting rooms on weekends for the homeless, if they will sign their signatures to an inspired from letter co-authored from Ron Paul and Obama appealing to Iran's president to have a little chat regarding the U.S. of A. appologizing for any anxiety our leadership may have caused.
@John if it were hidden how would you not know about it numb n.u.t.s.
You call this a "populist tone"?? If this is the best populist tone that Newt can come up with then he'd best quit now. How about speaking of the US factories that have shut down in clean US cities and moved the jobs, technology and intellectual property to horribly polluted cities in China. Chinese factories where they have to string suicide nets around the outside to catch distraught workers trying to jump to their deaths rather than be worked like slaves and paid 35 cents per hour. Darvin Dowdy
I don't mind Newt. Good bye Mittens.
To you Newt bashers-- Would you rather China be the first colony organizers on moon? I disagreed with him on subsides for ethanol whe he had oppotunity to kill it. The contract with America in early 1990s had nothing I disagreed with. Reps would not have taken majority if not for Newt. The week Newt agreed to a penalty of $300,000 Federal Judge Royce Lamberth fined the Clinton Admin for Hillary care $300,000. He was exzonerated on the ethics charge and IRS audit of the 501 (3-C) tax exempt org passed inspection. Mitt has lied about that and the writer of article has passed over that. Mitt is already a one time loser to Mc Cain 22085. But hell I will vote for anyone of the RINOS who can leave condensation on a mirror against the hack, empty suit , pseudo savant genius hussai obama.
Newt is a democratic operative
Romney's comments about the very poor makes a very clear distinction between what conservatives and liberals think and do. Liberals would like to end poverty; that's why they pushed and got Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid which has in effect dramatically reduced poverty and misery among the elderly, the disabled, and the orphans. Conservatives do not care about the unfortunate people that's why they call Social Security "socialism" and want to get rid of all social programs, and they are on the right track by pushing to make the Bush Tax Cuts permanent (which taxes investment between 0 to a max 15% rate). Conservatives piety and Christianity starts and ends at the church gate; liberals take more seriously the command to "love your neighbor as you love yourself", e.g. they would like the poor to have the same Health Care they enjoy.
Clearly demagoguery, race baiting and pandering only plays well in South Carolina.
tom castano is a typical lying liberal
Newt is about transformation -- infusing ideas and change in government -- and he has the record to prove it. Romney is about using his money to trash Newt. In a campaign about ideas and policy Newt wins easily. In a campaign about personal destruction Romney's money wins
Newt to turn around the "Has Baggage" charge to an an asset do this.
Carry a Travel Bag with wheels and big letters that say "BAGAGE" on it. Then with the news cameras rolling calmly stop and unzip the bag, pull out a large placard with a Big Idea printed on it, hold it up to the camera and simply say in a loud voice " THIS IS MY BAGGAGE" Do this a few time or every day until the election and you will win.
Anyone out there who can Please get this Idea to Newt I don't have connections. Or satureate Face Book till he gets it.
Gingrich's faux-populism is nauseating to listen too. It is so phony and so hypocritical. Gingrich is a multi-millionaire with a half-million revolving line of credit at Tiffany's. Romney made his money from the private sector and entrepreneurship. Gingrich did it through influence peddling after Republicans kicked him out of the Speakership. Gingrich was calling for Dodd and Frank to be jailed over their involvement in Fannie and Freddie. Then we find out he has getting 1.6 million from Freddie himself.
Wow Castano! Are you serious? You're watching way to much MSNBC, Raquel Maddow, Chris Mathews, etc... you really need to get a balanced perspective and quit watching ONLY one side of these issues. Your broad brush stereotypes really makes you look bad.
News Flash! Caring for the downtrodden has NOTHING to do with party affiliation, although liberals like to think of themselves as knights on white steeds. There are good and bad in both parties and lots of generous liberals and conservatives. You're also wrong about your accusation against Christians. Most of the volunteers that I run into are either Evangelicals, Catholics or Jews. Get over your hate.
However, it is a bit embarassing to see that Obama gave away a mere 1% of his income last year whereas Romney gave away 10%. Obama looks like a tight-wad. But then again, we can't expect him to walk what he talks now, can we? If Obama really loved the poor he would take on the same health care he is imposing on the rest of us, which he isn't.
Wow, Progressive M$tty's Millions sure are hard at work here at WSJ's blog.
His Millions are busy funding his army of paid hacks who troll here with inane, juvenile post that contain unending and repetitive snarks/insults, but no sustaining argument to refute Speaker Gingrich's message.
Just read the trash posted here from those poised as individuals, instead of the paid trolls pushing their talking point memes, it's to transparent to deny.
They never refute Newt's message of restoring America to the Reagan Revolution that ended and transformed Carter's Malaise, stopped Clinton's drift with Newt's 2nd Reagan Revolution that Cut Big Lib/RINO Govt spending/Budgets/Taxes and reformed Welfare.
This is the exact cure now gravely needed to end and reform Barack O'Linsky's current Socialist Malaise - Newt's cuts/caps/balance and repeal of regs that are chocking America's golden goose of Free Market Capitalism.
Until these paid Mittiot Trolls can directly refute this central message from Newt, just take their drivel for the paid Progressive Robamney propaganda that it is, and ignore it.
How is this constant paid blog smear campaign any different from the 18 $ Million worth of 13,000 smearing TV spots aimed at attacking Newt in FL with Alinsky tactics lies any different.
Is RINO Romney, the GOP Establishment's "Selected", not elected, choice the kind of man that will be any different from POTUS Obama?
Consider that that they both employ Alinsk's disgusting tactics to "WIN" by clearing the field, and given that they have both now signed into law America's first Top Down Govt Socialized Medicine, both with a mandate!
If you believe it's not so, then the RINO GOP/M$tt salute you, if not, the Conservative Base/Tea Party welcomes your voice, as these voters will never support a Progressive in Conservative appearance as their GOP "selected and bought" Nominee.
Think on this single salient fact - given the voting #s, Romney cannot win the nomination , nor the Presidency without the Conservative Base/TP.
Should the RINO GOP force their selected Progressive candidate Mitt the Flipper on us, do go vote, only don't vote for Mitt as our Nominee.
If he is forced on us as the GOP Nominee, only vote for Conservative Congressional/State office candidates, and leave the POTUS field blank, or write in your own choice. Send your messagfe to the corrupt. Elite RINO GOP leaders who are only concerned about their positions, not our Nation.
We must now first defeat the RINO GOP, before we can take out the Socialists that now run the Senate/WH/Fed Govt.
Otherwise, stop this current RINO GOP dog/pony show, save the $ for the General, and let the next McLame lose again with Mitt, and nobody wins but the ruling elites in our current Athens on the Potomac, currently in both parties.
Who is boss now, America?
Is it the condescending, arrogant, DC elites, or us "Bitter, Cracker, Clingers in Flyover" as the RINO/Socialist Dems refer to us openly, that outnumber them in numbers to large to be ignored, if we unite behind a firebrand candidate?
That devoted man is Speaker Newt Gingrich, who appeals with the vision and proven Conservative accomplishments instead of buying influence with the pols and media to buy High Office.
The time to decide and act is Now, so make your choice, for it's effect will determine the future of America, your children and grandchildren for many years to come. (caution: here come to snarky paid sharks from Robamney Central)
Knowledge is power - Some have called Paul Tsongas a Socialist!!!?? Read what wikipedia has to say about this man. Hardly to be a socialist when you perscribed to Reaganomics! I quote "Tsongas was generally viewed as a social liberal and an economic moderate. He was especially known for his efforts in Congress in support of historic preservation and environmental conservation on the one hand, as well as for his pro-business economic policies on the other.
He played a major role while in the House in the creation of Lowell National Historical Park, as well as in the establishment or expansion of a number of other National Park System areas. And he played an equally key role later in the Senate, working closely with then Interior Secretary Cecil Andrus, in successful passage of the massive Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980, which had been hopelessly deadlocked in the Senate since its original passed by the House in 1978.[4]
Relative to business and economic matters, Tsongas focused in particular on the Federal budget deficit, a cause he continued to champion even after his presidential primary campaign ended, by co-founding the Concord Coalition.
Tsongas was criticized on occasion by opponents as a Reaganomics-style politician, and as being closer to Republicans with regard to such issues. In the mid-1980s, he shocked many of the members of the Americans for Democratic Action by telling them that they should focus more on economic growth than wealth redistribution.
He once quipped, "If anyone thinks the words government and efficiency belong in the same sentence, we have counseling available" AGAIN, HARDLY a SOCIALIST!
I can understand why Mitt would have voted for someone who believed in economic growth rather that wealth redistribution....
Obama starts taking a page from Obama? Not surprising considering much alike they are.
Actually, Romney gave away 20% last year.
Tiresome, boring republican eedeeots
Wake me up when they nominate Romney.
Obama, Obama, Obama.
@Nancy Kelly you want to know what Newt's assessment of the country, etc; He has written books that go into detail for you.
I know Newt is the right President for 2012, and even if Newt wins I want him to include Ron Paul in there somehow, RP has some good messages that resonate. Common Sense Americans realize what RP says about economic recovery.
Its Newt's turn, we know what he thinks, know where he's been in govt and how he works under pressure; Newt has worked for years doing what? figuring out and brainstorming how to fix Americas problems using conservative thinking. Even if RP claims he will do some amazing things, Newt is the best overall pick for President
"Eedeeots" > Ebonics for ignorant parasite demanding more GOP voter's $ for Barry's stash! Sometimes confused with "gimmie, gimmie, gimme" heard during Barack's Flash Mob or Occupier criminal public raids on US Citizens and their property, protected by local Dem politicians. 10 More Months, thugs!
Alexis de Tocqueville observed:
"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."
Wise up. Wake up.
it doesn't matter who is elected president. If Obama was a leader, he would have explained to the American people that the idea of "nation-building" in Afghanistan is an illusion. He should have begun to withdraw combat troops instead of pursuing a "surge."
They are both fools. Romney believes that if he wears his magic underwear he will be a god one day. Either one will guarantee an Obama re election, but that is what the GOP must want. Then they can sit back and cry about how conservative they are, but they dont have to actually govern, they can just obstruct. They were not all that conservative when Jorge Bush was president, or when his father, Read My Lips was president. They nominated Dole, certainly not conservative, and Juan McLame, certainly not conservative, so we have a marxist party, and a moderate party. Fools, utter fools
There is one thing for sure. Ole Donald Trump and Mitt Romney will be two guys sitting in the Oval Office trying to figure out to make millions and millions off the taxpayer's backs while Gingrich could have been busy putting America back together again. I guess all dreams can't come true. Whatever happens to America will be well deserved. The people voted for Obama in 2008 so what would make me think they would vote for Gingrich in November? I was hoping they can see how the media is ruthlessly attacking Gingrich because he is not part of the establishment while they are letting Romney slide unless Obama plans to attack closer to November. I remember how the media attacked and attacked Sarah Palin just like they are Gingrich now. Gingrich does not play ball with the media so they try to tear him from limb to limb.
This just in: Newt cares so much for poor people, he's decided the first 12,999 permanent colonists sent to Moon Camp Gingrich (pre-statehood) will be well below the official poverty level. Gingrich says it makes perfect sense: weaker gravity means no trampoline needed!
Mitt thinks the poor are properly taken care of. so why worry about the poor?
Mitt is not of the people. He doesn't get it. If you walked into his country club, (Look at yourself in the mirror, whould Mitt and you be comfortable being friends?) He'd wonder how you found your way in the building.
Mitt Romney is uber rich. He gropes with understanding how we, the 'great unwashed' live! Mitt is NOT your man.
I've been reading through all of these comments and one thing really stands out. All of the people who support Newt are totally whacked. Seriously, they perfectly fit the mold for redneck, racist, bigoted, right wing, Christian nut jobs; every single one of them. I never wanted Newt to get the nomination, but now that I see who he represents, I REALLY don't want him to succeed. The country's only hope is another fours years with Obama. If any of these crazy GOP candidates win, the country will spiral out of control.
What? I just heard George Soros said he was fine with Romney or Obama. This list of liberal/moderate endorsements for Romney tells us all we need to know. McCain's endorsement was bad enough.
Newt is about as conservative as the Muslim in Chief, anyone who says otherwise is either a Liberal or stupid - pretty much the same thing, I guess!
What does the Gnewtster know about the "working 'man" Seriously, this lard ass has never had a job in the private sector, he has always fed at the public tit. Wind him up, give him a desk, a phone, and he lobbies, that's all folks and he has become rich doing so.
Brittney -- Considering Soros is one of the most sophisticated political manipulators in history, why do you think he'd say that during a GOP primary? Do you think there's any chance he said that because he knew a few witless conservatives would take it at face value and use it as a reason to vote for someone besides Mitt? My reverse psychology works on my 6 year old. Soros' reverse psychology appears to work on you.
There is so much pessimism in the GOP but why? Any of the remaining three major contenders would be a far better chief executive than the current one. I'll vote for Newt in my state primary but if Romney is the eventual nominee I have no problem voting for him in November. It's only February and I'm already hearing too many Republicans giving up already. The vast majority of Americans is fed up with the direction the country is going and they want leadership in the Oval Office. Flawed as they are Mitt and Newt would be a welcome change in Washington.
You would expect such populist attacks from the Left, not the right, but understandably Gingrich is fighting to stay in this. Having said that, any current GOP candidate is a welcome change compared to the current prez. But, it can't happen soon enough, I need a job!!!!
Also, unemployment expected to rise to 9.1% and gross GDP is 1%...these are depression-like numbers. C'mon Obama, get us out of these Hoover-villes and approve the stinking pipeline. show a spine BO. Romney you can't come soon enough to put an end to this misery!!!!!
Obama will kick Romney's fancy rich boy butt and decent americans will laugh so much watching the faces of the republican crybabies.
Democrats will win the House and the Senate with comfortable majorities.
2012 will be the Republican Disaster Year
Gingrich is not trying to revive his campaign, he already has a successful one. Romney had to turn negative and run a dirty campaign in Florida to win. In fact Romney spent 99% of his total Florida budget attacking Newt. That's the act of a desperate politician.
I think Conservatives have been paying the media far too much attention. Every time I hear a Republican say that someone is unelectable, or that someone can't beat Obama, I feel like taking a proverbial belt to their behind. The Democrats would like us to believe we can't beat Obama, but I think the opposite is true. Can anyone remember a time when the average American was this fed up with our government and politicians? Obama's brand is quickly becoming one of the most politically poisonous in history. Unelectable is the word that comes to mind.
Newt has one insurmountable problem to overcome - no one can stand him. I don't know about being unelectable, but he is unlikable. Newt is Newts own worst enemy, but then Newt is Newt's biggest fan too. Newt lacks the stability to be President. He becomes irritable and childish in the face of opposition. He has resorted to petty name calling and attacks on Capitalism. The fact is moral character is important, and Newt is the only candidate who is clearly missing it. We haven't even begun to see the skeletons in Newt's closet. Spending 15 years as a lobbyist can have that effect on a person.
It is mind boggling the general tenor of the back-and-forth between Romney and Gingrich. It makes me think that it is fortunate that neither served in the military as it is obvious they are both unable to place the current pressing issue ahead of personal quest for power. Obama is the largest problem facing our nation. Both Romney and Gingrich are willing endanger the prospect of removing Obama from office by making a mockery of the Republican nomination process. If there were an ounce of decency or honor in either man, he would call for a halt to this nonsense, shake hands, and move forward in an effort to build solidarity toward halting the slide of this nation into utter chaos. This is no longer a joke. I am one who will vote for the Republican, no matter who it is. However, I am not as staunch in my opposition of a third party as I used to be; an unreliable ally in your own foxhole can be a bigger problem than the enemy. It will be difficult to develop real trust in either Mitt or Newt.
Let's see Florida Romney ran 13,000 commercials and Gingrich ran 200 what are the odds that more people were influenced by the 65 times the adds. The only problem is that the Thief-in-Chief will have a lot of money to flood the braindead tube watchers. No matter what you all think Newt knows all the inn's and out's of how to get things done in Congress, he is the guy we need in the White House!
Gingrich - just STOP wasting everybody's time and get-out of this race - because you are NOT going to beat Mitt Romney to the finish line!! Just take the "dumb blonde" calista (wife # 3) on a long vacation and read her some history books - as you are just an Historian!!
The only man that America needs is none other than Ron Paul! In reality it is not me saying so, but the very Founding Fathers from their graves! Yes, Romney, Gingrich and Santorum are nothing but Militaristic Imperialists! Their foreign policy consists of guns plus guns, the very thing that self-destroyed every single past Empire.
Trump is a clown. Romney deserves support from a joke on t.v.
Newt has officially jumped the shark.
Fig Newton bends to the wind in whatever direction he thinks will garner him votes or attention. He is old school political opportunist plain and simple. Today it is the populist theme to play against a wealthy opponent in the past it was sitting on the couch with Nancy Pelosi when global warming was the hot topic. I am amazed people consider him the conservative choice...could not be further from the truth ....political opportunist plain and simple.
The poor don't need a safety net. They need a residence on the moon.
Newt Switched to Populist tone - further proof he will say anything to gain power. Newt doesn't believe in much other than "Newt". He will say what he thinks people wants to hear.
He is a danger to this country.
It saddens me that in the terrible state this nation is in, these are the best candidates the Republicans can get to go up against Obama? It won't surprise me if we get another 4 years of Obama. The republican candidates are all weak.
Newt is nothing morre than the Nancy Pelosi of the GOP....changes like the wind...evil as satan.
Newt wants to hire millions more to increase the size of federal government, which will decrease the tax base. Newt has big ideas to spend more of our money on. He would also be expected to bomb Iran for his buddy Adelson. Chuck Norris will probably be leading the attack. He gets crazier every day.
If you didn't learn anything else from the 2008 election, you should have learned this: DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH ABOUT THE CANDIDATES! And do your own analysis; if you do, you'll find that--of the 4 GOP candidates remaining--Speaker Gingrich IS the only one who will beat Obama, and correct the course of this ship called America.
We need to elect somebody to the white house that has good morals, a family man who can bring God back to the White House. Someone like Newt. Vote for family values , vote Newt.
Egad... Newt Gingrich CANNOT win a general election. He's as polarizing as Obama. He has WAY too many skeletons in his closet. If Gingrich gets the GOP nod, we're practically guranteeing Obama another 4 years.
It is hard to believe anyone believes this man. Shame on the once conservative Human Events website for giving him a microphone for years.
Newt likes hiring people? Wouldn't that require that he have actually had run a business? How stupid are the American people to take this guy seriously, but call Ron Paul a crackpot? Of course, we did vote in Bush and Obama, so pretty stupid!
Does this mean Newt is going to sit on Nancy Pelosi's lap and lie to us again about Global Warming?
Anonymous, your logic and outrage really characterizes Newt and his supporters. Please, do not change because it helps remind Americans why Newt is losing.
Angry Badger loses big in Fla. 'cuz Americans don't like Angry Badgers
Hank Reardon wrote :
"How stupid are the American people to take this guy seriously .."
We elected Obama, a man with zero business experience - so VERY stupid if you ask me.
For shame, WSJ. This is not a "shift" on the part of Newt Gingrich at all. I heard him speak in Meredith, NH, at Church Landing prior to the NH primary. His message was one focusing on being the "pay check president," not the "food stamp president." His concern has been with policy that provides jobs for all, since a vibrant economy floats all boats.
Your bias is showing....
Stick a fork into the little toad - he's done.
All Newty Fruiting can do now is damage Mitt or Rick.
His ego and arrogance will however keep him on the stage
Except, of course, as a President, he shouldn't be hiring people at all. We don't need more Czars...
A trampolin, not a safety net for the very poor.
why not a thousand space shuttles to the moon and beyond?
Colonies in space of young children cleaning up the toilets.
A janitorial job for every child, to learn he value of work.
Newt is full of that which rhymes with mitt
What this government needs is some firin'. The Government is too big and needs to be reduced. We need a turn around guy, a guy who can do what needs to get done.
All we hear from Gingrich is promises on big government projects... Exactly what Obama promised and what FDR promised.
Well, I hope everybody is happy. The entire MSM, a few disgruntled losers from the past Republican players, and now Drudge and even some at Fox - have all thrown Newt Gingrich under the bus. It's a shame. Instead of really listening for actual substance of what each candidate said, we're all being cattled into seeing only the surface of polished politicians trying to repeat Obama's GQ style while campaigning. You'd think we'd learned our lesson in 2008. We didn't. You'd think we'd pay attention to someone who's a real problem solver and clear thinker. We aren't. So, there you have it. The media, and because we all worship its opinion over our own common sense, has annointed Romney as if he's our man to defeat Obama. Really, he's the worst moderate fence-rider we've seen in two decades. And just because he bought the Florida primary with 17 million dollars at a rate of 96 attack ads to Gingrich's 1 add - doesn't prove he's more qualified and suitable - it just means we bought the lie that he is. SC voters weren't fooled. And who gives a @#$! what the self-agrandizing Donald thinks? Why would anybody take him seriously when all he knows is how to promote himself? We've really missed the facts this time, again, as we did in 2008. But the difference this time, is that our country's going down financially and our culture is changing to a high tax socialist society - led by ultra liberalists and the corporate wealth in the land. I think James Cameron has it right - there's a hell coming it would be best not to be here. See you all later, somewhere else.
Perfect for a shifty politician. I would support someone with a more populist tone who actually believed it, like Pat Buchanan, but not someone who is just trying to win an election. Gingrich is a globalist - about as far opposite a populist as you can get!
I will be voting for Ron Paul or not at all. If the GOP wants my vote, they know how to get it. They didn't listen last time and lost.
Lindsey Graham on Greta Van Sustern the other night actually praised newt. As part of the coup that ousted Newt he in essence said it was a mistake. He called Newt erratic but he said that he now understands why. He said in order for Newt to accomplish what he did there had to be compromise and even though he went into some meetings with Clinton seeking the most advantageous agreement he sometimes had to give up on some of the establishments desires. Because of that Lindsey indicated he created enemies within the Republican party. Lindsey said if he had a do over he would have backed Newt and since Newt's departure the Republican party has digressed.
When Newt began attacking the very essence of our capitalist beliefs he lost any credibility that he would be the right man to turn this country around. When he so freely called Paul Ryan's Entitlement Reform plan "right wing social engineering" he lost the ability to once again speak for the free society we all enjoy. When he sat down on the couch with Nancy Pelosi and declared that we must do something about Global Warming, then he lost credibility that he will guide us to a workable energy plan. And just for good measure, why is a "historian" hired by Fannie and Freddie and paid more than $1.6 million taxpayer dollars?
Mitt Romney+Scott Brown, how does Obamacare work for you all. thank you Mitt/Scott
I see the Romney GOP rino sheeple are here. Let's hope the GOP doesn't pull the rope and hurt the nose of their sheep as they follow over the cliff and take the rest of us with them.
Regardless of the nominee, Please, Please do NOT lose sight of the objective. OMG 2012, Obama Must Go !
Sandonn3- Stop using others talking points and come up with your own. Listen to the entire discussion regarding Paul Ryan, secondly Newt has said it was a mistake to sit with pelosi but was trying to show that the Republican Party should not be excluded from the climate change debate and finally what is wrong with being a consultant? Let's ask Romney who Gingrich influenced to change their vote regarding Fannie and Freddie and. If Romney can't come up with any names then he is a liar and unfit to be President.
With the way Trump handeled this entire election season, I don't see his endorsement a valued as it seems to the MSM. The only advantage it offers is the money, and that alone will make a difference.
With the Tea Party railing against Romney, it will continue to get more and more interesting.
Hope Newt can float until the convention
Shifted? When? He's always been populist. That's his bread and butter. His big government job training program for the unemployed isn't a new appeal. He has brought this up at least twice during the debates....and got a standing O.....from conservatives....Huh? Were they even listening to his populism back then or were they such lemmings that they would have applauded to anything Newt said? Same goes for his appeal for amnesty, er pathway to legality. Pure populistic pablum. In Iowa it was ethanol subsidies, in Florida it was moon exploration this is just classic typical 'ole Newt. Glad you're starting to pay attention.
The battle for a decent President was lost the day Michele Bachmann suspended her campaign. Thanks Iowa, your 'first in the nation caucus state' privilege has just been revoked. Michele will appear on the ballot in my state and I will place my vote for her, not out of protest..It will be an actual vote for the best candidate. That is after-all what a Primary is for.
Newt is by far the smartest one out there. Newt, let's talk about the issues, housing, jobs, military, Iran, Israel, etc.
Gods Best to you and you have my support.
Ron Paul or bust! If he isn't at the top of the ticket, it won't be Ron Paul they'll have to worry about going 3rd party, it'll be every one of his supporters...writing him in. If the GOP is serious about beating Obama, they'll have to get this through their heads.
Why can't anyone see through the distractions of polished politics and appearances? Leave that to the liberals - they always vote their 'feelings' and ignore common sense. And their proud of it. Romney has no stable position on anything except winning, playing the "GQ' Mr. Nice Guy for the cameras, and riding the fence either way, attacking anyone who comes close to his minority following. Just because the media finds him attractive to give him air time, means nothing. This country is about to forfeit its global currency value, its position of strength, and its ability to foster corporate job growth. Our electorate is split right down the middle, as abortion and gay rights vividly displays. Is there any wonder the Republic is failing? Get over your petty views and find us a leader who will create jobs, lead us out of a nuclear middle east, and keep us strong to keep from being attacked, again. Anyone who claims 'character' right now when we're on the ropes - is an idiot! Churchill in Britain was hated by almost 90% of conservatives and villified by the British press. But the King and his advisors knew that Churchill could get things done, and didn't give a damn about what others thought about him. And they knew he could lead with his command of speech and pursuasion. And, most importantly, they knew he really believed in the survival and goodness of Britain. Now ask yourself - who fits that description here? Newt is without question the best qualified, most committed (not best funded), and most ready to fight our fight for us - ALL OF US. Go, Newt. Without you, we'll just get another Obama, Harvard trained, wealthy liar.
to jpk.... Actually I was sitting in front of the television when I heard Newt spewed his vile "Right Wing Social Engineering" so I did hear the entire statement and he meant every word of it. Newt actually didn't apologize for sitting next to Pelosi, what he said is "it was a mistake" how do you get to apology from mistake? It was a mistake because he was going to be called on it. As for global warming, (oops I forgot it is now called Climate Change), I just read that the earth stopped "warming" 15 years ago, and we could possible be entering into a "global" cooling (like during the 1970s). Anyone running for the Republican nomination who bashes capitalism has lost all credibility in the very people who work for a living. The problem with Fannie and Freddie is we don't really know why he was paid the $1.6million dollars now do we? We also know that the contract that he released was not the first contact, rather it was a renewal contract. So where's the original contract? Could it be that he doesn't want us to see it? I will not vote for Newt Gingrich. He is nothing more than a bitter, egotistical, narcissistic, moral-less human being.
Donald Trump old videos trashing Mitt Romney...who he JUST ENDORSED????????
They don't call the United States the land of opportunity for nothing; every one in this country has a shot at an education, and a good life, if they are willing to apply themselves. Most are poor for 5 reasons:
1. Laziness
2. Failure to get at least a high school education
3. Irresponsibility
4. Getting in trouble with the law
5. Drugs and alcohol
Their plight is generally their own fault, but we are supposed to feel sorry for them and give half of everything we have to them. We estimated in the military, that there was going to be 10% of the people who are absolutely worthless. That applies to the whole world, always has, and always will. There are enough of them now that they will probably reelect Obama, and when they do, you can say good by to the United States of America.
How do I know Newt is not sliming around the sheets with another bimbo (besides Calista)? If they both believe in an open marriage, how could we ever trust Newt to have the moral character to lead this country???
Sandon3- You claim Gingrich bashed capitalism but you are bashing Gingrich because of capitalism. You can't have it both ways. Either you're for capitalism or not. As I stated unless Romney or you can prove that Gingrich was an influence peddler by pointing out who he influenced then either shut up or be labeled liars,
Donald Trump is nothing but a charlatan and a political pundit pretender. The reason he backed out of running for President is that he is woefully uneducated about politics, especially foreign politics and there is no way he can best Newt in any debate. (That's why the BIG touted debate last Jan27 was cancelled). SO what does he do? He endorses the dorky Mitt Romney. (And so did Miss dorky Ann Coulter!).
If Newt fails to the get the nomination, it's going to be another four dismal years of Obama. Just think about it.
I just hope people will get smarter next November, And Vote out the Marxist
Gingrich is one and done.....
The answer is and always has been, Dr Ron Paul.
"Politics may not be the oldest profession in the world but the results are the same" ~ Janis Joplin
It's about frickin time! That is what won SC.....talking about Obama/Democrat and federal government corruption and abuses. Then you blow it in FL with stupid banter back and forth with Romney instead of attacking Obama and exposing blatant media bias. And Santorum doesn't even know who he's running against because he never attacks Obama......just Newt or Romney. I'm starting to wonder if Santorum is working for Obama. SANTORUM: STOP ATTACKING CONSERVATIVES and figure out WHO the real enemy is!!!
When I talk to my very liberal friends about politics, they like Newt's ideas... as long as I brand them as my own and never tell them the source. They love the ideas of employing the residents of public housing to maintain said housing. They actually liked the idea of work training for the unemployed til they found out the source. The guy has good ideas which can please liberals without giving up the principles of conservatism.
If he sticks with the populist tone, he will get the nomination and probably even the presidency. If my crazy liberal friends like the ideas, the moderates will love them.
He likes hiring people if we would just put him in the position to do so for the first time. Not!
The problem isn't the message it's the messanger, plus there are too many messages, which one to believe? If the Rep party stands for anything it should be for defending the free markets. Any candidate who attacks his opponent for being a sucessfull capitalist should be disqualified from any Republican primary. What's more calling the incumbent president a commie might get them riled up during a primary debate in SC but it won't win over the folks you need to switch their vote and the math says that you will need some to do that in order to win.
A vote for Romney is a vote for Soros, Soros stated in Europe a couple days ago, Romney and Obama are alike, and it did not matter which one was elected Soros could work with either one.
Romney and Trump rail against China trade policies. Yet look at the companies central to Romney's campaign:
Staples and Sports Authority. These outlets are loaded with cheap products made in China that are then sold
on the US economy. And all those jobs are mostly minimum or barely over minimum wage retail jobs. Romney even believes foreign bank accounts are better. I am definitely not impressed.
Just the fact that he constantly shifts shows what you get. There is only one candidate who is consistent, and consistently correct. Ron Paul 2012! Save our Nation!!!
If the best Gingrich can do is to misrepresent Mitt's comments to elevate himself, he looks like a man with an ax to grind, not a leader with a vision.
"There are some things you just can't imagine in your life. This is one of them," said Romney of the [Trump] endorsement.
Sounds as if Mitt is star struck by the Donald.
I prefer to imagine a United States without either Barack Obama or Mitt Romney as its president. And, yes, I can imagine a permanent colony on the moon as we prepare for a manned space flight to Mars, the only conceivable way to accomplish this very doable feat. I can also imagine how glorious it would be to have a president firmly grounded in U.S. and world history instead of one who relies on famous historical quotes produced by a Google search and taken out of context; a president who lifts our knowledge and improves our vision with his speech instead of speaking to the American people in a condescending and disparaging manner, or just as bad, a president who believes his business accomplishments of a decade ago satisfy the longings of a nation in need of bold ideas while preserving and protecting individual liberty.
Grandiose isn't a pejorative in my dictionary, but I am having trouble imagining a well-organized Gingrich campaign. I agree with Newt that the nomination and the general election can be won without the need to spend embarrassing sums of money that the average American finds appalling, but you still need a somewhat traditional organization of talented campaign workers in each state, whether paid or volunteer, making sure your name gets on the ballot, that your campaign has visibility and people know who to contact if they want to get involved, that no worthwhile opportunity for candidate exposure and appearances is overlooked. Social media outreach needs a rapid response team that lets individual supporters know they are part of a broader community that exists outside cyber space and how they can connect with people on the ground. Said organization doesn't have to look like the Romney campaign, but it had better be apparent and not hidden from view.
I haven't met an independent that would vote for Romney but I do know many who like Ron Paul and I live in Detroit. Sorry but the switch you use to turn on Republicans is the same switch that turns OFF independents. If these employment numbers keep going up the slightest Romney will get laughed at.
Vote your conviction,
Washington Wire is one of the oldest standing features in American journalism. Since the Wire launched on Sept. 20, 1940, the Journal has offered readers an informal look at the capital. Now online, the Wire provides a succession of glimpses at what's happening behind hot stories and warnings of what to watch for in the days ahead. The Wire is led by Reid J. Epstein, with contributions from the rest of the bureau. Washington Wire now also includes Think Tank, our home for outside analysis from policy and political thinkers.
Sign up for Capital Journal Daybreak


text:
Trouver un exemplaire dans la bibliothèque
Recherche de bibliothèques qui possèdent cet ouvrage...
|Genre/forme :
Publishers' advertisements
Publishers' cloth bindings (Binding)
Blocked bindings (Binding)
Contemporary bindings (Binding)
|Format – détails additionnels :
|Online version:
Alcott, Louisa May, 1832-1888.
Comic tragedies.
Boston : Roberts Bros., 1893 (Cambridge : University Press : John Wilson and Son)
|Personne nommée :
|Louisa May Alcott; Louisa May Alcott; Anna Bronson Alcott Pratt; Susan Coolidge
|Type d'ouvrage :
|Public jeunesse
|Format :
|Tous les auteurs / collaborateurs :
Louisa May Alcott; Anna Bronson Alcott Pratt; Roberts Brothers (Boston, Mass.),; Cambridge University Press,; John Wilson and Son,
|Numéro OCLC :
|Notes :
|"From the little stage library, still extant, the following plays have been selected as fair examples of the work of these children of sixteen and seventeen"--Foreword, dated 1893.
Copyright entered by Anna B. Pratt (i.e. "Meg").
Publisher's advertisements: p. [1-2] preceding frontispiece: Louisa M. Alcott's writings; [2] pages following text: "Louisa M. Alcott's famous books" (with a portrait); "Susan Coolidge's popular story books."
Frontispiece has plain guardsheet.
Binding: mustard yellow cloth; lettering; rules, twig and ivy decorations stamped in black on front cover; gold bands and publisher's monogram on spine; printed, decorated end-papers in all-over patern.
Library copy as issued; binding: mustard yellow cloth.
|Description :
|[7]-317, [3] pages, [2] leaves of plates : illustrations, portraits ; 18 cm
|Contenu :
|A foreword / by Meg --
Norna, or, The witch's curse --
The captive of Castile, or, The Moorish maiden's vow --
The Greek slave --
Ion --
Bianca : an operatic tragedy --
The unloved wife, or, Woman's faith.
|Autres titres :
|Norna, or, The witch's curse.
Captive of Castile, or, The Moorish maiden's vow.
Greek slave.
Bianca, an operatic tragedy.
Unloved wife, or, Woman's faith.
|Responsabilité :
|written by "Jo" and "Meg" and acted by the "Little women."
Critiques d'utilisateurs


text:
Bonnie Academy
Glendale, CA 91202
(818) 244-3241
About This School
Bonnie Academy is located in Glendale, CA. It is a preschool that serves children ages 2-6. Bonnie Academy is Corporate (employer) Sponsored and has a capacity of 66 children.
Bonnie Academy offers instructional programs in reading and math.
Bonnie Academy offers instructional programs in reading and math.
write a review
Bonnie Academy ReviewsThere are no reviews yet for this school. Be the first one to write a review!
Bonnie Academy PhotosThere are no photos for this school yet. Be the first to add a photo.
Recommended Learning Products
Trust Education.com to find smart things kids love
Unlimited Workbooks and Worksheets
90% of Students Understand Concepts Better Since Using PLUS
Reading and Math Program for Kids 3-7
300+ games and activities. Try it for free!
Unlimited Library of Children's Books
Over 750 stories at your fingertips


text:
Tree Lafayette Endowment has opportunity to match all donations 50% from the Community Foundation of Greater Lafayette. For every $100, we receive an extra $50. The endowment is for replacement trees and between vandals, accidents, salt, insects, and a harsh environment; we lose about 5% of our urban forest. We have removed 187 trees this year from the Emerald Ash Borer and only planted 170. We have 959 ash trees that will need to be removed.
Mail checks to
Community Foundation of Greater Lafayette
1114 E. State Street, Lafayette Indiana 47905
memo, Tree Lafayette Endowment.
Or mail checks to
Tree Lafayette, 1915 Scott Street with the following directions:
Memo either supporter for Tree Lafayette or tree Lafayette endowment for the Community Foundation
For every car in Lafayette, we need one half acre of trees to remove the CO2 from the exhaust.
Mission Statement
Tree Lafayette promotes a healthy community by providing education, leadership, and inspiration in planting and caring for trees.
Vision Statement
TreeLafayette's vision is a green and beautiful urban landscape in our community.
©2014 Tree Lafayette • 1915 Scott Street, Lafayette IN 47904 • email@example.com


text:
Definitions for to one ear
This page provides all possible meanings and translations of the word to one ear
Princeton's WordNet
monaurally, to one ear, in one ear(adverb)
in a monaural manner
"the stimuli were presented monaurally"
Images & Illustrations of to one ear
Find a translation for the to one ear definition in other languages:
Select another language:
Discuss these to one ear definitions with the community:
Word of the Day
Would you like us to send you a FREE new word definition delivered to your inbox daily?
Use the citation below to add this definition to your bibliography:
"to one ear." Definitions.net. STANDS4 LLC, 2015. Web. 30 Nov. 2015. <http://www.definitions.net/definition/to one ear>.


text:
1999 Ford Windstar • 80,000 miles
The lighter does not work. I changed the fuse but that did nothing. I need to change the lighter.
January 16, 2012.
January 16, 2012.
"go buy a new lighter" is your answer. I asked how to change the light and that is no answer. Please return my donation because you gave me nothing I can use. This site is useless.
Jan 16, 2012.
Jan 16, 2012.
Youll need the replace the element first then the base if needed. If you have a test light you can check for power COMING TO THE base. Then u know its the element. If none the panal will have be removed. Then check the power wire at the base. If it has power replace the base. Ty for using 2carpros
I drive a mazda soho 121 1998 model and my flickers and fan on the inside does not work, however in the fuse box just below the steering wheel the ports where the fuses plug in are ...
1 answer • 1998 Mazda 121 • 108,000 miles
I have a Saab 9-3 convertible (1998). The Maxi fuse (number 5), has blown. I fitted a new fuse, started the car for a few seconds, and checked the fuse to find it was again blown. I ...
1 answer • 1998 SAAB 9-3 • 112 miles
I have a 1999 Pontiac Montana, and had to replace a blown Maxi fuse for the ignition, it started up after replacing it but upon starting agin it blows the fuse again....why?
8 answers • 1999 Pontiac Montana
My fuse blown on my headlights but i don't know which fuse it is because the fuse cover is missing with the numbers of different parts. i drive a 93' Chrysler New Yorker 3.3 engine
1 answer • 1993 Chrysler New Yorker • 196,500 miles


text:
I was at TechEd2009 a few weeks ago and I was so sad we weren't able to talk more about VS2010 there as much as we wanted to. One of my highlights of the conference was standing in the lunch line while a group of folks from a variety of different companies discussed the new historical debugger work we are doing in VS2010. They were clearly excited and had a bunch of questions so I introduced myself as the Development manager for the team that worked on that and we sat and had lunch. Although there is clearly more we can do in this area than we will be able to ship in VS2010, it was clear these folks were looking forward to picking up the Beta. Of course at that time, the Beta was slowly cooking, but now it's ready, and we can have a good conversation. The team I'm responsible for worked on bringing this pipeline of value and innovation in VS2010:
NEW FEATURE AREA Historical Debugger
NEW FEATURE AREA Test Impact Analysis
Code Coverage
Whew! That should keep my blog full for a few months anyway!
Please pull down the Beta and give it a spin. It's available from the product page here:
So far I have been running Beta1 and VSTS2008SP1 Side by Side with no issues. We spent a lot of time in this release focusing on setup, side by side and uninstall so I do think this is way better than in previous releases.
Fix those bugs, and stay posted for more deep dives in all of these areas. Sorry I didn't drill deeper, but I wanted to get this post out today.


text:
Question about
How can i mirror my android phone on pc/mac? The screen of my phone is broken so i cannot access my phone and the phone is screen locked with password. Help!
I have a samsung galaxy S3. And i want to extract my data from it. While the screen is broken and the phone is screen locked. I've tried doing it with Samsung pc suit i.e. Kies which isn't helpful because phone is locked. And I've also tried Using utilities like Droid@Screen, Android Screencast or Android Screen Monitor but again it requires to enable an option from developers mode under settings which is not accessible due to broken screen. i just need my data. please help!
U can take ur memory & or sim card install in ur computer to retreat info or another fone lik eurs
mark as good answer
0 people like this answer
Just plug it in via USB cable to your computer, it should show up under your storage devices, unless you specificity turned that option off on your phone, this way you can get all your data from the internal storage. If matters are worse, or this can't help you, the only way to get around this, is to get a screen part from a friend, which you can connect to your phone's Mainboard, but that requires you to take your entire device apart and is not recommended unless you have proper knowledge about the internal structure of your device.
mark as good answer
0 people like this answer
follow this question
This question has been viewed 6951 times.
Products mentioned
3 users following this question:
This question has been viewed 6951 times.
Last activity .