text:
Katie Holmes: A Big Fan of Aldo Qualheim Booties
- Comments Off
Katie Holmes has been spotted out and about more than once styling her coveted Aldo "Qualheim" booties. I can understand Katie's obsession with these shoes- they go so well with just about any outfit. There is ample room to tuck in a pair of skinny jeans if you feel like sporting the look, and with […]
Who Says High Heels Are For Women Only?
Not Lenny Kravitz, that's for sure! Kravitz showed a unique fashion statement Thursday when he appeared wearing leather pants tucked into knee-high wedge boots. Kravitz completed his look with a cross body man purse. What do you think–love the look or is the high heel for men fashion a bit to over the edge for […]
Jennifer Lopez Rocks the High Heels at Movie Premiere
At the Miami premiere of her new movie, The Back-Up Plan, Jennifer Lopez wore a stylish Spring 2010 Monique L'huillier dress…simply stunning on J-Lo. And the heels Lopez is wearing? Love em? I do. They are from the Spring 2010 Lanvin Collection. While Jennifer's latest movie may not be getting the best reviews, I give […]
Sarah Jessica Parker, High Heels and Twins!
Look at Sarah Jessica Parker strutting in her high heels while carrying one of her twin girls and pushing the stroller with her other baby twin girl! How does the Sex and The City Star manage to make motherhood look so easy and stylish, all at the same time? I love that smile on her […]
Which Celebrity Wore The Heels?
- Comments Off
Can you guess whose celebrity feet are in these high heels? Singer Fergie paired these high heeled sandals with a short print dress at a movie premier back in 2008.
Celebrity Fashion No-No's??
Ashley Green, who plays Alice Cullens in Twilight, wears leather shorts with her gladiator-style high heels. What do you think? Leather shorts? And heels? Uh, I think not.
Red High Heels Celebrity Style
Nicole Richie looks like such a cute mama to be! Love the red high heels and her jean look–baby belly and all….Nicole doesn't lose a stlish beat! Makes me want to run out and get a pair of red heels and some new jeans.


text:
SERVICE First Baptist Church in Appleton City, Missouri on Saturday, December 1, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.
MINISTERS Pastor John Scofield and Reverend Chad Pollard
VISITATION Hill & Son Funeral Home in Appleton City, Missouri on Friday, November 30, 2007 from 6:30 - 8:00 p.m.
INTERMENT Appleton City Cemetery in Appleton City, Missouri
MEMORIALS Alzheimer's Association or Appleton City Cemetery Association
Edmond Eugene VanBuskirk, son of James Floyd and Elizabeth Kathleen (Carrier) VanBuskirk, was born in Rockville, Missouri August 27, 1925. He passed away November 28 2007 at St. John's Medical Center in Joplin, Missouri at 82 years of age. Edmond lived in the Appleton City, Missouri area all of his life. On September 16, 1946 Edmond and Lois Jean Culbertson were united in marriage in Fort Scott, Kansas and to this union three children were born. He farmed and had worked as custodian at Montrose Public School for 16 years. He was Sunday School Director at the First Baptist Church for 35 years and retired as custodian for the church in August of 2005 after approximately 30 years of service. He held a membership at the Appleton City First Baptist Church and also the Church of God (Holiness). Mr. VanBuskirk dedicated his life to his family and "The Church". He enjoyed baseball and liked listening to ball games on the radio. He was preceded in death by his parents. Survivors include his wife, Lois of Appleton City; his children, Shirley and husband Michael Gwin of Romayor, Texas, Linda and husband Steve Saia of Carl Junction, Missouri, and Terry VanBuskirk of Appleton City, Missouri; one sister Lavon and husband Jim Sommers of Loveland, Colorado; a brother-in-law Leon Culbertson and wife Anna; seven grandchildren: Shawn Gwin, Amy (Gwin) Smith, Matthew Dutton, Lindsay Dutton, Jeremy VanBuskirk, Corey VanBuskirk, and Jared VanBuskirk; and six great-grandchildren.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Research from Ipanema Technologies and Orange Business Services finds preferences for hybrid cloud, hybrid networking and Do-It-Yourself high amongst IT leaders
June 22nd, LONDON: New research from Ipanema Technologies and Orange Business Services today reveals that 66% of enterprises plan to move to a hybrid cloud environment within the next four years. The study of 150 enterprise CIOs and IT Directors finds that a large majority plan to combine public cloud and private data centres to deliver business applications – rather than opting for a cloud only (17%) or private data centre only approach (17%). Results also highlight trends in cloud networking, delivery, adoption and barriers to adoption.
Networking in the cloud
To support the hybrid cloud model over 63% of businesses surveyed plan to use a mixture of traditional MPLS-based corporate networks and cost-effective IP-VPNs. With almost 70% of companies citing cost reduction as the primary driver for selecting a cloud project, moving to a hybrid networking strategy emerges as a popular route to control IT budgets.
Cloud delivery
Despite the increased complexity associated with adopting a hybrid networking model, surprisingly over 50% of companies plan to deploy and manage their on-going cloud program themselves, using their own IT department. Just 31% plan to outsource this process to external service providers to manage with the remainder not planning to adopt the cloud.
Cloud adoption and barriers to adoption
By the end of 2012 50% of companies are set to have a private cloud (completely virtualised central datacentre) in place. Almost a third have already implemented a private cloud with a further 20% expecting to have done so within the next two years. Security was seen as the primary barrier to cloud adoption with 58% of respondents believing security concerns prevented greater implementation. Performance of the cloud model was also viewed as a challenge with 39% of respondents viewing performance issues as a barrier to further adoption.
Béatrice Piquer, Marketing Director for Ipanema Technologies said of the research "From this research it's clear that a combination of cloud and private data centres is becoming the primary model for enterprise IT. The cloud can bring great benefits but a hybrid model will add complexity as applications are delivered from a variety of locations across different networks." She continued: "IT leaders taking on this challenge need to view the WAN as a strategic asset and guarantee performance at the application level."
About the research
The research study is a collaboration between Ipanema Technologies and Orange Business Services in order to understand the objectives and challenges companies face as they move to the cloud. The results were compiled at a major joint conference for CIOs and IT Directors held in Q2 2011.
To know more about Ipanema's Cloud-ready networks vision:
- Download our white papers on:
- Moving to Office 365, Google Apps, Salesforce or any SaaS? Here's what it means for your WAN
- CLOUD COMPUTING – 31 companies describe their experiences with Orange Business Service
About Orange Business Services:
Orange Business Services delivers new kinds of communications solutions, designed for the challenges organisations face. It provides world leading communications, combining fixed and mobile, voice, data and multimedia services into integrated, secure and effective solutions designed specifically for multinational organisations.
About Ipanema Technologies
The Ipanema System enables any large enterprise to have full control and optimization of their global networks; private cloud, public cloud or both. It unifies performance across hybrid networks. It dynamically adapts to whatever is happening in the traffic and guarantees constant control of critical applications. It is the only system with a central management and reporting platform that scales to the levels required by Service Providers and large enterprises. With solutions used extensively by many of the world's largest telecom providers and enterprises across business and public sectors, Ipanema controls and optimizes over 100,000 sites among 1,000+ customers. www.ipanematech.com
Source: Ipanema
- Cloud Is Changing The Game For Retailers On Cyber Monday - November 27, 2015
- Is Your Office 365 Data Properly Protected? - November 25, 2015
- Cloud Computing – The Game Changer - November 19, 2015
- Banking On Recurring Revenue In The Cloud - November 18, 2015
- Juniper Research: Top Ten Tech Predictions For 2016 - November 16, 2015


text:
'Gospel of Jesus's Wife' not a fakeComment on this story
Cairo - Scientists who examined a controversial fragment of papyrus written in Egyptian Coptic in which Jesus speaks of his wife concluded in papers published on Thursday that the papyrus and ink are probably ancient and not a modern forgery.
The existence of the fragment, known as the "Gospel of Jesus's Wife," was made public at an academic conference in 2012. It is seen by some as a glimpse of how ancient Christians thought while decried by others, including the Vatican, as an absurd fake.
Scientific studies performed over the last two years at various universities suggest both the ink and the papyrus are probably no newer than the 9th century and that the language and writing style are authentic for the period.
"All of that points towards the papyrus being ancient and the papyrus having been written on in antiquity," Karen King, the Harvard Divinity School historian who first presented the fragment in 2012, told reporters on a conference call.
The results of the tests were published online by the Harvard Theological Review on Thursday.
Although the business card-sized fragment contains only a few scraps of sentences apparently torn from a larger text, they seem to express ideas not seen in the canonical Gospels of the New Testament.
"Jesus said to them, 'My wife...,'" reads one snippet cut off by a torn edge, while other lines have Jesus suggesting that at least some women could be his disciples, roles filled in the canonical Gospels exclusively by men.
King has repeatedly said no one should mistake the fragment as evidence that Jesus actually had a wife, a notion held by few, if any, modern Christians. Rather, she said, the text shows how some ancient Christians were discussing the place of women and the role of marriage in the church.
"This was a piece of literature generated by Christians to affirm that women who are mothers or wives can be followers of Jesus," King said on Thursday.
Among other tests, a team at Harvard's Human Evolutionary Biology department analysed the carbon in the fragment and dated the papyrus to between A.D. 659 and 869, roughly contemporaneous with an undisputed papyrus fragment of the Gospel of John.
A conservationist and an electrical engineer from Columbia University analysed the chemical composition of the ink using micro-Raman spectroscopy and found it lacked the characteristics of modern ink but was similar to the Gospel of John ink.
The Theological Review also published a rebuttal by Leo Depuydt, an Egyptologist at Brown University, who said he reviewed the test results but remained convinced that the fragment was a modern forgery inexpertly daubed on an ancient scrap of blank papyrus.
King, the original presenter of the papyrus, said she welcomed the debate over the text's ambiguities.
For all we know, she said, the sentence fragment continued after the tear with Jesus revealing his wife was in fact the church, or perhaps, King suggested: "My wife? Are you kidding? I don't have a wife!" - Reuters
Hungry for more scitech news? Sign up for our daily newsletter
Comment Guidelines
- Please read our comment guidelines.
- Login and register, if you haven' t already.
- Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
- Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.
- Verified email addresses: All users on Independent Media news sites are now required to have a verified email address before being allowed to comment on articles. You are only required to verify your email address once to have full access to commenting on articles. For more information please read our comment guidelines


text:
1.6 Million Penalty Proposed Against Easy Wireless
Download OptionsReleased: September 30, 2013
Federal Communications Commission
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554In the Matter of
File No.: EB-IHD-13-000105901
Easy Telephone Services d/b/a Easy Wireless
NAL/Acct. No.: 201332080001
Adopted: September 30, 2013
Released: September 30, 2013
By the Commission: Acting Chairwoman Clyburn and Commissioner Pai issuing separate statements.
INTRODUCTION1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), we continue our commitment to
combat waste, fraud, and abuse of the Lifeline program (Lifeline) by taking action and proposing
monetary forfeitures against a company that has apparently ignored our rules and exploited a program
dedicated to providing low-income Americans with basic telephone service. Specifically, we find that
Easy Telephone Services d/b/a/ Easy Wireless (Easy Wireless) apparently willfully and repeatedly
violated Sections 54.407, 54.409, and 54.410 of the Commission's rules2 by requesting and/or receiving
support from the Lifeline program of the Universal Service Fund (USF or Fund) for 307 ineligible
consumers for the month of September 2012. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances
surrounding these apparent violations, we propose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one million,
five hundred eighty-six thousand, five hundred forty-five dollars ($1,586,545).
BACKGROUND2. Lifeline Service. Lifeline is part of the USF and helps qualifying consumers have the
opportunities and security that phone service brings, including being able to connect to jobs, family
members, and emergency services.3 Lifeline service is provided by Eligible Telecommunications Carriers
(ETCs) designated pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act).4 An ETC may seek
and receive reimbursement from the USF for revenues it forgoes in providing the discounted services to
eligible customers in accordance with the rules.5 Section 54.403(a) of the Commission's rules specifies
that an ETC may receive $9.25 per month for each qualifying low-income consumer receiving Lifeline
1 This investigation, initiated under file no. EB-12-IH-1641, was subsequently assigned to file no. EB-IHD-13-
3 Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
27 FCC Rcd 6656, 666267, paras. 1118 (2012) (Lifeline Reform Order); see 47 C.F.R. 54.40054.422.
4 47 U.S.C. 254(e) (providing that "only an eligible telecommunications carrier designated under section 214(e) of
this title shall be eligible to receive specific Federal universal service support"); 47 U.S.C. 214(e) (prescribing the
method by which carriers are designated as ETCs).
5 47 C.F.R. 54.403(a).
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129service,6 and up to an additional $25 per month if the qualifying low-income consumer resides on Tribal
lands.7 ETCs are required to pass these discounts along to eligible low-income consumers.8
3. The Commission's Lifeline rules establish explicit requirements that ETCs must meet to
receive federal Lifeline support.9 Section 54.407(a) of the rules requires that Lifeline support "shall be
provided directly to an eligible telecommunications carrier, based on the number of actual qualifying low-
income consumers it serves."10 Pursuant to Section 54.407(b) of the rules, an ETC may receive Lifeline
support only for qualifying low-income consumers.11 A "qualifying low-income consumer" must meet
the eligibility criteria set forth in Section 54.409 of the rules, including the requirement that he or she
"must not already be receiving a Lifeline service,"12 and must, pursuant to Section 54.410(d) of the rules,
certify his/her eligibility to receive Lifeline service.13
4. Section 54.410(a) of the Commission's rules requires further that ETCs have procedures in
place "to ensure that their Lifeline subscribers are eligible to receive Lifeline services."14 As explained
above, such eligibility requires that a consumer seeking Lifeline service may not already receive Lifeline
service. This obligation therefore requires, among other steps, that an ETC search its own internal
records to ensure that the ETC does not provide duplicate Lifeline service to any subscriber (an "intra-
company duplicate").15
5. The Commission's rules further prohibit an ETC from seeking reimbursement for providing
Lifeline service to a subscriber unless the ETC has confirmed the subscriber's eligibility to receive
6 Lifeline provides a single discounted wireline or wireless phone service to each qualifying low-income consumer's
household. See 47 C.F.R. 54.401. See also 47 C.F.R. 54.400(h) (defining "household" as "any individual or
group of individuals who are living together at the same address as one economic unit"); Lifeline Reform Order, 27
FCC Rcd at 6760, para. 241 (noting that the costs of wireless handsets are not supported by the Lifeline program).
7 See 47 C.F.R. 54.403(a). Tribal lands include any federally recognized Indian tribe's reservation, pueblo, or
colony, including former reservations in Oklahoma. See 47 C.F.R. 54.400(e).
8 See 47 C.F.R. 54.403(a); Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6681, para. 53.
9 See 47 C.F.R. 54.40054.422.
10 47 C.F.R. 54.407(a).
11 47 C.F.R. 54.407(b). In 2011, the Commission took action to address potential waste, fraud, and abuse in the
Lifeline program by preventing duplicate payments for multiple Lifeline-supported services to the same individual.
See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization, Report and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 902223, 9026, para. 1 (2011)
(Lifeline Duplicates Order); see also Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization, Order, 28 FCC Rcd 9057
(Wir. Comp. Bur. 2013); 47 C.F.R. 54.410(a). Specifically, the Commission amended Sections 54.401 and 54.405
of the rules to codify the restriction that an eligible low-income consumer cannot receive more than one Lifeline-
supported service at a time. See Lifeline Duplicates Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 9026, para. 7. In the Lifeline Reform
Order, this codified restriction was moved from Section 54.401(a) to revised Section 54.409(c). See Lifeline Reform
Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6689, para. 74, n.192. The Commission reiterated this limitation in the Lifeline Reform
Order. See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd 6689, para. 74; 47 C.F.R. 54.405.
12 47 C.F.R. 54.400(a), 54.409.
13 47 C.F.R. 54.410(d).
14 47 C.F.R. 54.410(a).
15 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6691, para. 78. In June 2013, the Wireline Competition Bureau on
delegated authority underscored these obligations, prohibiting ETCs from activating "a service that it represents to
be Lifeline service, even on an interim basis while the consumer's application is being processed, before verifying
eligibility," including that a consumer's household does not already subscribe to Lifeline service. Lifeline and Link
Up Modernization and Reform, Order, 28 FCC Rcd 9057, 9059, para. 6 (Wir. Comp. Bur. 2013); see also 47 C.F.R.
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129Lifeline service.16 In accordance with Section 54.410, before an ETC may seek reimbursement, it must
receive a certification of eligibility from the prospective subscriber that demonstrates that the subscriber
meets the income-based and program-based eligibility criteria for receiving Lifeline service, and that the
subscriber is not already receiving Lifeline service.17 As the foregoing discussion reveals, when an ETC
seeks Lifeline service support reimbursement for a low-income consumer who already receives Lifeline
service from that same ETC, that ETC has violated its obligation in the Commission's rules to confirm
the subscriber's eligibility for Lifeline service.
6. ETCs that provide qualifying low-income consumers with Lifeline discounts file an FCC
Form 497 with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), either quarterly or monthly, to
request support that reimburses them for providing service at the discounted rates. An ETC's FCC Form
497 documents the number of qualifying low-income customers served and the total amount of Lifeline
support claimed by the ETC during the specified time period. Section 54.407(d) provides that an ETC
may receive reimbursement from the Fund, however, only if it certifies as part of its reimbursement
request that it is in compliance with the Lifeline rules.18 An ETC may revise its Form 497 data within 12
months after the data is submitted.19
7. In addition to reviewing claims submitted by ETCs, USAC conducts in-depth data validations
(IDVs) to further ensure compliance with the Lifeline rules.20 When a company is selected for an IDV,
USAC will send the company a letter requesting subscriber data for a prior month or months.21 Once
USAC receives the company's data, it analyzes the company's subscriber information to determine
whether there are any duplicate subscribers and sends the company another letter with its initial results.
USAC provides the company with an opportunity to submit a revised subscriber list to correct subscriber
data or to remove subscribers that are no longer receiving service. If USAC determines that a low-income
consumer is the recipient of multiple Lifeline benefits from that same ETC, it will send another letter to
the ETC identifying the instances of intra-company duplicative support, seek a recovery, and notify the
ETC that it must commence the deenrollment process for those duplicates.22
16 See 47 C.F.R. 54.410(b).
17 See 47 C.F.R. 54.410(b), (c; see also 47 C.F.R. 54.410(d).
18 See 47 C.F.R. 54.407(d).
19 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd 6788, para. 305. Subsequent revisions, however, do not vitiate violations
of an ETC's duty to verify the eligibility of the subscribers that are reflected on any of its previously filed Form
20 See Lifeline Duplicates Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 9026, para. 7.
21 See, e.g., Letter from Universal Service Administrative Company, to Caitlyn Lumpkin, Easy Telephone Services
(dated November 12, 2012) (on file in EB-IHD-13-00010590).
22 Although USAC recovers the duplicative support payments for the month at issue in the IDV examination
(generally a single month), it does not currently recover the duplicative support that the ETC received for the same
duplicates for the preceding and following months. We therefore direct USAC, when it notifies an ETC to
commence the process of deenrolling intra-company duplicates identified through the IDV process, to require the
ETC to inform USAC of (a) the month and year in which the ETC began requesting and/or receiving duplicative
support for providing Lifeline service to each such duplicate and (b) the month and year in which the ETC stopped
requesting and/or receiving duplicative support for providing Lifeline service to each such duplicate. Thereafter,
USAC shall recover from the ETC all of the duplicative support it has received from such duplicates.
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-1298. Easy Wireless. Easy Wireless is a Florida corporation23 that provides wireless telephone
services, predominantly to Lifeline customers. On November 17, 2011, the Oklahoma Corporation
Commission (Oklahoma Commission) designated Easy Wireless as an ETC to provide wireless Lifeline
service in Oklahoma.24
9. USAC conducted an IDV of the Lifeline support requested by Easy Wireless for its
Oklahoma subscribers for the month of September 2012 (September IDV). On March 4, 2013, USAC
sent a letter to Easy Wireless informing the company that the September IDV revealed 307 individual
intra-company duplicates among the subscribers for whom Easy Wireless had sought Lifeline support
reimbursement.25 According to USAC, these 307 duplicate enrollments resulted in a request for $10,515
in overpayments from USAC.26
DISCUSSION10. Under Section 503(b)(1) of the Act, any person who is determined by the Commission to
have willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any provision of the Act or any rule, regulation, or
order issued by the Commission shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty.27 Section
312(f)(1) of the Act defines "willful" as the "conscious and deliberate commission or omission of [any]
act, irrespective of any intent to violate" the law.28 The legislative history to Section 312(f)(1) of the Act
clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act,29 and the
Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context.30 The Commission may also
assess a forfeiture for violations that are merely repeated, and not willful.31 "Repeated" means that the act
was committed or omitted more than once, or lasts more than one day.32 To impose such a forfeiture
penalty, the Commission must issue a notice of apparent liability, and the person against whom the notice
has been issued must have an opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture penalty should be
23 See Letter from John J. Heitmann, Esq., counsel for Easy Telephone Services d/b/a Easy Wireless, to Marlene
Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission at 2 (dated Jan. 22, 2013) (LOI Response).
24 See Oklahoma Corporation Commission, "Eligible Telecommunications Carriers,"
http://www.occeweb.com/pu/ETC%20Designation/2012-11-01ETCInformationreport.pdf (last visited Aug. 13,
2013). Easy Wireless is also designated as an ETC in additional states.
25 See Letter from Universal Service Administrative Company, to Caitlyn Lumpkin, Easy Telephone Services (dated
Mar. 4, 2013). For the purposes of this NAL, an "individual intra-company duplicate" is an individual subscriber
for whom the ETC sought and/or received reimbursement more than once in a single month.
26 See id.
27 See 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(a)(1).
28 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1).
29 H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982) ("This provision [inserted in Section 312] defines the terms
`willful' and `repeated' for purposes of section 312, and for any other relevant section of the act (e.g., Section 503)
. . . . As defined[,] . . . `willful' means that the licensee knew that he was doing the act in question, regardless of
whether there was an intent to violate the law. `Repeated' means more than once, or where the act is continuous, for
more than one day. Whether an act is considered to be `continuous' would depend upon the circumstances in each
case. The definitions are intended primarily to clarify the language in Sections 312 and 503, and are consistent with
the Commission's application of those terms . . . .").
30 See, e.g., So. Cal. Broad. Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991), recons. denied, 7
FCC Rcd 3454 (1992) (Southern California Broadcasting).
31 See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Monetary Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 1359,
1362, para. 10 (2001) (Callais Cablevision) (proposing a forfeiture for, inter alia, a cable television operator's
repeated signal leakage).
32 Southern California Broadcasting, 6 FCC Rcd at 4388, para. 5; Callais Cablevision, 16 FCC Rcd at 136, para. 9.
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129imposed.33 The Commission will then issue a forfeiture if it finds, based on the evidence, that the person
has violated the Act, or a Commission rule or Order.34
11. Based on the record evidence developed in this investigation, we conclude that that Easy
Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 54.407, 54.409, and 54.41035 of the rules
by concurrently requesting Lifeline support reimbursement for 307 subscribers who were already
receiving Easy Wireless Lifeline service. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we therefore
conclude that Easy Wireless is apparently liable for forfeiture penalties totaling $1,586,545.
PROPOSED FORFEITURE12. For the violations at issue here, Section 503(b)(2)(B) of the Act authorizes the Commission to
assess a forfeiture against a telecommunications carrier of up to $150,000 for each violation or each day
of a continuing violation, up to a statutory maximum of $1,500,000 for a single act or failure to act.36 In
determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, we consider the factors enumerated in Section
503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, including "the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation and,
with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and
such other matters as justice may require,"37 as well as our forfeiture guidelines.38
13. In calculating a proposed forfeiture, we are guided in part by VCI Company, a Notice of
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture issued to a Lifeline provider that had apparently submitted inaccurate
Form 497s to USAC and, as a result, collected support to which it was not entitled.39 In that case, the
Commission analogized an inaccurate low-income reimbursement request on a Form 497 to the
33 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(4); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(f).
34 See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7591, para. 4 (2002).
35 47 C.F.R. 54.407, 54.409, 54.410. See also supra paras. 3-6 (discussing these rules and observing that when
an ETC seeks Lifeline service support reimbursement for a low-income consumer who already receives Lifeline
service from that ETC, that ETC has failed in its obligation to confirm the subscriber's eligibility for Lifeline service
in violation of the rules).
36 See 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(B); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(2). These amounts reflect inflation adjustments to the
forfeitures specified in Section 503(b)(2)(B) ($100,000 per violation or per day of a continuing violation and
$1,000,000 per any single act or failure to act). The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Pub.
L. No. 101-410, 104 Stat. 890, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134,
Sec. 31001, 110 Stat. 1321 (DCIA), requires the Commission to adjust its forfeiture penalties periodically for
inflation. See 28 U.S.C. 2461 note (4). The Commission most recently adjusted its penalties to account for
inflation in 2013. See Amendment of Section 1.80(b) of the Commission's Rules, Adjustment of Civil Monetary
Penalties to Reflect Inflation, DA 13-1615, 2013 WL 3963800 (Enf. Bur. 2013); see also Inflation Adjustment of
Monetary Penalties, 78 Fed. Reg. 49,370-01 (Aug. 14, 2013) (setting Sept. 13, 2013, as the effective date for the
increases). However, because the DCIA specifies that any inflationary adjustment "shall apply only to violations
which occur after the date the increase takes effect," we apply the forfeiture penalties in effect at the time the
violation took place. 28 U.S.C. 2461 note (6). Here, because the violations at issue occurred before September
13, 2013, the applicable maximum penalties are based on the Commission's previous inflation adjustment that
became effective on September 2, 2008. See Inflation Adjustment of Maximum Forfeiture Penalties, 73 Fed. Reg.
44,663, 44,664 (July 31, 2008).
37 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(E).
38 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(8); Note to Paragraph (b)(8): Guidelines for Assessing Forfeitures.
39 VCI Company, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 15933 (2007) (VCI). The Commission
imposed forfeitures for both Lifeline and Link Up overcollections in VCI, but it employed the same forfeiture
methodology for both. Overcollections of Link Up support are not at issue in this investigation. The Commission
did not subsequently release a forfeiture order in that case, as would be its normal practice, because the target
company had ceased operations and ceased to exist as a corporate entity.
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129submission of inaccurate revenue information on a Form 499,40 and therefore adopted a forfeiture
framework based on that utilized in USF contribution enforcement cases. In particular, in VCI, the
Commission proposed a forfeiture methodology based on three components: (1) a base forfeiture of
$20,000 for each inaccurate FCC Form 497 that VCI filed; (2) a base forfeiture of $20,000 for each month
VCI received improper Lifeline support based on its inaccurate FCC Form 497 filings; and (3) an upward
adjustment equal to half of VCI's aggregate Lifeline overcollection.41
14. In this NAL, we preserve the basic components of VCI's three-part structure, but we adopt an
approach to two of the forfeiture components that is better calibrated to address the harm that Easy
Wireless's apparent conduct has caused to the Fund, and also to reflect the substantial reforms that the
Commission has implemented to the Lifeline program since VCI was issued. In particular, the
Commission in recent years has increased its emphasis on ETCs' responsibilities for preventing waste,
fraud, and abuse in the Lifeline program and has adopted rules codifying the requirement that a subscriber
may not receive more than one Lifeline supported service per household.42 If an ETC violates our rules
and submits a request for Lifeline support that it knew or should have known includes ineligible
subscribers, and thus requests and/or receives more reimbursement from the Fund than the amount to
which it is properly entitled, it undermines the low-income support reimbursement mechanism. The
Commission believes that the imposition of a significant forfeiture amount is a necessary response to
Lifeline overcollection violations. Lifeline ETCs must expend the necessary company resources to ensure
compliance with the Commission's Lifeline rules, especially the rules and procedures requiring that
providers request and/or receive federal universal service support only for service provided to eligible
consumers. Imposing a significant forfeiture on such rule violators should deter those service providers
that fail to devote sufficient resources to ferreting out company practices resulting in overcollection
violations. In addition, a significant forfeiture should achieve broader industry compliance with Lifeline
rules that are critically important to the effective functioning of the Fund.
15. With respect to the first component, we preserve the VCI framework's base forfeiture of
$20,000 for each instance in which an ETC files an FCC Form 497 that includes ineligible subscribers in
the line count, which is a violation of the certification requirement contained in Section 54.407(d) of our
rules.43 We believe that this base forfeiture amount continues to accurately reflect the need to ensure that
USAC "receive[s] consistently accurate and reliable information from carriers."44
16. With respect to the second component of the three-part structure, it remains appropriate for
the forfeiture to reflect the improper Lifeline support sought and/or received from the Fund. However, we
conclude that the VCI forfeiture framework should be reoriented to place greater emphasis on the number
of ineligible subscribers for whom the ETC requests and/or receives reimbursement from the Fund. We
are concerned that the prior framework fails to reflect the extent and gravity of the alleged violations.
Accordingly, we adopt a base forfeiture of $5,000 for each ineligible subscriber for whom the ETC
requests and/or receives support from the Fund in violation of Sections 54.407, 54.409, and 54.410 of our
40 The Commission requires telecommunications providers to file Form 499 to report the revenues they receive from
offering service. See 47 C.F.R. 54.711. The information providers report on Form 499 is used to calculate and
assess contributions to the USF, the interstate Telecommunications Relay Services Fund, the administration of the
North American Numbering Plan, and the shared costs of local number portability administration.
41 VCI, 22 FCC Rcd at 15939-43, paras. 1628.
42 See, e.g., Lifeline Duplicates Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 9026-32, paras. 8-18 (codifying the one-discount-per-eligible-
customer rule); Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6659-60, para. 2 (explaining that reforms adopted in February
2012 could save as much $2 billion over three years); id. at 6687, para. 69 (codifying the one-per-household rule).
43 47 C.F.R. 54.407(d).
44 See VCI, 22 FCC Rcd at 15939-40, para. 18.
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129rules.45 We conclude that calculating the second component of the proposed forfeiture by reference to the
number of ineligible subscribers, rather than to the duration of the violation, and imposing a forfeiture of
$5,000 for each ineligible subscriber strikes an appropriate balance in light of our need to protect the Fund
and send a clearer deterrent message to the industry.46 We are committed to strict enforcement of our
rules and to taking all measures to root out waste, fraud, and abuse even for violations that are of short
duration. Together with the first component, this revised structure takes into consideration both the
duration of the violation and the magnitude of harm to the Fund.
17. Finally, with respect to the third component, we find, as we did in VCI, that a significant
upward adjustment of the base forfeiture amount is warranted. However, we increase the upward
adjustment calculation to better reflect the gravity of the harm to the Lifeline program in particular, to the
Fund in general, and to the consumers who contribute to the Fund.47 Thus, we propose an upward
adjustment equal to three times the reimbursements requested and/or received by Easy Wireless for
ineligible subscribers. In adopting this approach to the upward adjustment, we are informed by Section
503(a) of the Act48 which, in the context of improper intercarrier compensation payments, authorizes a
forfeiture of three times the amount of improper compensation. Section 503(a) establishes the principle
that, when the harm done by the violation varies based on the amount of the money involved, it is most
appropriate to calculate the forfeiture in a manner that reflects the magnitude of the violation. That is the
circumstance in this case, and we therefore adjust the forfeiture upward by an amount equal to three times
the overcollection requested and/or received.
18. Based on the facts and record before us, we have determined that Easy Wireless has
apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 54.407, 54.409, and 54.410 of the rules.49 As
documented above, in a single month and in connection with the submission of an FCC Form 497, Easy
Wireless requested Lifeline support reimbursement of $10,515 for 307 customers who were receiving
more than one Easy Wireless Lifeline service. Accordingly, with respect to the first component of the
structure articulated above, we propose a base forfeiture of $20,000 for the submission of the FCC Form
497 that includes the 307 ineligible intra-company duplicate subscribers in the line count. With respect to
the second component, we propose a base forfeiture of $1,535,000 based on the 307 ineligible subscribers
for whom Easy Wireless requested and/or received compensation from the Fund. Finally, with respect to
the third component, we propose an upward adjustment of $31,545, which is three times the amount of
support Easy Wireless requested and/or received for ineligible consumers. We therefore conclude that a
total proposed forfeiture of $1,586,545 against Easy Wireless is warranted.
19. This forfeiture structure for Lifeline overcollection violations will in no way foreclose the
Commission or any other governmental entity from taking additional enforcement action and imposing
additional forfeitures for other violations of the Lifeline rules. Moreover, the Commission clarifies that
the penalties that result from this forfeiture structure are separate from any amounts that an ETC may be
required to refund to USAC in order to make the Fund whole.
ORDERING CLAUSES20. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDEREDthat, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, and 1.80 of the
rules,50 Easy Telephone Services d/b/a Easy Wireless is hereby
NOTIFIEDof this
46 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(8) (providing that, in determining the amount of a forfeiture penalty, the Commission will
take into account the extent and gravity of the violations, among other factors).
47 See 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(E); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(8).
48 47 U.S.C. 503(a).
50 47 U.S.C. 503(b); 47 C.F.R. 1.80.
Federal Communications Commission
LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITUREin the amount of one million, five hundred eighty-six thousand,
five hundred forty-five dollars ($1,586,545) for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating Sections
54.407, 54.409, and 54.410 of the rules.51
IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the rules,52 within thirty (30)
calendar days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, Easy
SHALL PAYthe full amount of the proposed forfeiture or
SHALL FILEa written statement
seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.
22. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, wire transfer, or
credit card, and must include the NAL/Account number and FRN referenced above. Easy Wireless shall
also send electronic notification of payment to Theresa Z. Cavanaugh, at email@example.com and
to Pam Slipakoff at firstname.lastname@example.com on the date said payment is made. Regardless of the form of
payment, a completed FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted.53 When completing the
FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID) and enter the letters
"FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Below are additional instructions you should follow
based on the form of payment you select:
Payment by check or money order must be made payable to the order of the Federal
Communications Commission. Such payments (along with the completed Form 159) must be
mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000,
or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005
Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.
Payment by wire transfer must be made to ABA Number 021030004, receiving bank
TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001. To complete the wire transfer and ensure
appropriate crediting of the wired funds, a completed Form 159 must be faxed to U.S. Bank at
(314) 418-4232 on the same business day the wire transfer is initiated.
Payment by credit card must be made by providing the required credit card information on FCC
Form 159 and signing and dating the Form 159 to authorize the credit card payment. The
completed Form 159 must then be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box
979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S. Bank Government
Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.
Any request for making full payment over time under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief
Financial Officer--Financial Operations, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Room 1-A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.54 If you have questions regarding payment procedures, please
contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk by phone, 1-877-480-3201, or by e-mail,
23. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture, if any,
must include a detailed factual statement supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant
to Sections 1.16 and 1.80(f)(3) of the rules,55 and may include any data or information demonstrating that
the IDV results referenced in this NAL are materially erroneous or anomalous, or that the forfeiture
53 An FCC Form 159 and detailed instructions for completing the form may be obtained at
54 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1914.
55 47 C.F.R. 1.16, 1.80(f)(3).
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129proposed is otherwise inappropriate.56 The written statement must be mailed to Theresa Z. Cavanaugh,
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the
caption. The written statement shall also be emailed to Theresa Z. Cavanaugh, at Terry.
firstname.lastname@example.com and to Pam Slipakoff at email@example.com.
24. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of
inability to pay unless the petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period;
(2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); or (3)
some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current financial
status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
financial documentation submitted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, and first class mail to Joseph Fernandez, Chief
Executive Officer, Easy Telephone Services d/b/a Easy Wireless, 4352 SE 95th Street, Ocala, FL 34480.
Marlene H. Dortch
56 For example, the written statement could include data showing that the month examined in the IDV was an outlier
and that far fewer duplicates existed in the months preceding and following that month.
Federal Communications Commission
ACTING CHAIRWOMAN MIGNON L. CLYBURNRe:
Easy Telephone Services d/b/a Easy Wireless; Assist Wireless, LLC; Icon Telecom, Inc.;
TracFone Wireless, Inc.; and UTPhone, Inc.
The Lifeline program provides critical communications services to those who are least likely to
be able to secure these services for themselves. It affords the less fortunate an ability to contact family,
employers, prospective employers and most critically emergency services, by the same rapid and
reliable means that are routinely available to the rest of us. Protecting this vital program from fraud,
waste and abuse is a central component of our efforts to ensure the program's viability, and it is with this
in mind that we propose the very substantial penalties in these cases.
Collecting support for duplicate Lifeline service the practice we address in these cases is not
only illegal, it diverts resources from legitimate users of the program and is unquestionably within the
power and duty of Lifeline providers to prevent. It must stop. And, the more than $14 million in
forfeitures we propose here is meant to achieve that end.
Our goal is to be tough, but fair. The fines in these cases are purposely large. However, I want to
ensure adequate deterrence without harming the legitimate service these providers bring to their
subscribers. Accordingly, I have instructed the Enforcement Bureau to carefully consider the companies'
responses to these NALs. Ultimately, our objective is to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse, while
preserving and promoting the availability of communications services to those in need. I will do all I can
to ensure that we achieve this balanced result.
Federal Communications Commission
Easy Telephone Services d/b/a Easy Wireless; Assist Wireless, LLC; Icon Telecom, Inc.;
TracFone Wireless, Inc.; and UTPhone, Inc.
Today, the FCC makes it clear that we are serious about combatting the rampant waste, fraud, and
abuse plaguing the Lifeline program. By proposing forfeitures totaling more than $14 million against five
providers for apparent Lifeline fraud, we begin the process of regaining the public's trust and showing
that we do not take responsible stewardship of public funds lightly.
From 2008 through 2012, the annual disbursements of the low-income component of the
Universal Service Fund grew from $817 million to $2.2 billion.57 Some of that growth may have been
organic, but we know that a significant amount was due to increased waste, fraud, and abuse within the
program. That's why the Commission adopted some reforms in early 2012 to prohibit such abuse.58 And
that's why today's action, enforcing those reforms, is so important.
The substantial abuses of the Lifeline program deserve a significant response. The instant NALs
meet that standard. I am especially pleased that my colleagues agreed to my request to increase fiftyfold
the proposed forfeitures against Easy Wireless, Icon Telecom, Assist Wireless, UTPhone, and TracFone
Wireless. A slap on the wrist is not sufficient when the same company seeks Lifeline support more than
once in the same month for the same person.
Unfortunately, these intracompany duplicates are just the tip of the iceberg. We know that the
Universal Service Administrative Company has already found tens of thousands of duplicate subscribers
in the Lifeline system--and that's just subscribers brazen enough to get Lifeline service from the same
company more than once. Many more have gotten Lifeline benefits from multiple companies. Back in
57 Compare USAC, 2009 Second Quarter Appendices, Appendix M03 January 1, 2008 through December 31,
2008 Cash Basis, with USAC, 2013 Second Quarter Appendices, Appendix M03 January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012 Cash Basis, available at http://www.usac.org/about/tools/fcc/filings/2013/q2.aspx.
58 See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization et al., WC Docket No. 11-42 et al., Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 27 FCC Rcd 6656 (2012).
Federal Communications Commission
FCC 13-129April, for example, the Commission issued notices to 37 Easy Wireless subscribers, each of whom had at
least five Lifeline accounts in his or her name.59 The American people won't stand for that kind of waste,
fraud, and abuse, and neither will I.
59 See L*** McKoy: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0509, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd
5044 (2013); S*** Richardson: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0511, Citation and Order,
28 FCC Rcd 5050 (2013); J*** Clardy: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0512, Citation and
Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5053 (2013); E*** Gardner: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0514,
Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5059 (2013); L*** Johnson: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-
IH-0515, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5062 (2013); C*** Smith: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No.
EB-13-IH-0516, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5065 (2013); C*** Cordova: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support,
File No. EB-13-IH-0517, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5068 (2013); A*** Butler: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate
Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0518, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5071 (2013); T*** Relf: Illegal Receipt of
Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0519, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5074 (2013); T*** Rolland: Illegal
Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0520, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5077 (2013); C*** Norton:
Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0521, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5080 (2013); F***
Chatkehoodle: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0522, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5083
(2013); B*** Wilson: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0523, Citation and Order, 28 FCC
Rcd 5086 (2013); B*** Crumpton: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0371, Citation and
Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4415 (2013); S*** Hayes: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0375,
Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4427 (2013); M*** Estrada: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-
IH-0376, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4430 (2013); R*** Jimenez: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File
No. EB-13-IH-0377, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4433 (2013); R*** Acuff: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate
Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0378, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4436 (2013); T*** Knox: Illegal Receipt of
Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0379, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4444 (2013); R*** Villareal: Illegal
Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0380, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4447 (2013); T***
Hinman: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0382, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4453
(2013); F*** Marshall: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0383, Citation and Order, 28 FCC
Rcd 4456 (2013); W*** Thompson: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0384, Citation and
Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4459 (2013); L*** Johnson: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0385,
Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4465 (2013); R*** Smart: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-
IH-0387, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4471 (2013); A*** Daniel: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No.
EB-13-IH-0389, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4477 (2013); T*** Turner: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support,
File No. EB-13-IH-0391, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4483 (2013); J*** Barnett: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate
Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0394, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4492 (2013); O*** Acosta: Illegal Receipt of
Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0396, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4498 (2013); R*** Gynells: Illegal
Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0399, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4507 (2013); R*** Rivas:
Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0400, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4510 (2013); N***
Scott: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0401, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4513 (2013);
N*** Herrera: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0402, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd
4516 (2013); S*** Taylor: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0403, Citation and Order, 28
FCC Rcd 4519 (2013); F*** Fernandez: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0405, Citation
and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4525 (2013); T*** Emery: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-0407,
Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4531 (2013); E*** Allen: Illegal Receipt of Duplicate Support, File No. EB-13-IH-
0410, Citation and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 4540 (2013).
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


text:
Of course he is (I read that sophmorically written article), but please, please don't take everything he says seriously. I don't. His music is entertainment. If you are looking for a message...there isn't one. It's teenage masturbatory rock & roll. That's all.
As far as his dodge of the draft (DRAFT), if the draft returned, do you think that the Bush daughters will line up to serve for their country, on the front lines?
I'm not going to go into the hunting crap, I don't hunt, I like animals. But I have friends who do. I feel that if you are hunting within their element, fine. If you hunt or let others hunt within an environment that merely traps the animal in a fenced in location then that sucks. Ted don't do that. He's an asshole (the manhandling of the protesters and mugging with cops IS uncool), but he's harmless.
And as far as politically correct...he's right. It has gone too far. What Michael Richards did was wrong because it was real hatred. Ted's hatred for Japan is an act. He sells out every show in Japan. Why? Because they know it's an act (OH look at the funny American!). The rest is comedy, he's an entertainer. He knows he has "REDNECK" and "ASSHOLE" stamped on his image, he'll never get rid of it.
I swear, if Lenny Bruce was alive today, he'd be railroaded just as he was in the 60's...you think Bruce could get away with this today?...
Are there any n*ggers here tonight? I know that one n*gger works here, I see him back there. Oh, theres two n*ggers Between those two n*ggers sits one k*ke man, thank God for the k*ke. Uh, two k*kes. Thats two k*kes and three n*ggers and one sp*c. One sp*c two, three sp*cs. One m*ck. One m*ck, one sp*c, one h*ck thick funky spunky boogey.
The point? That the words suppression gives it the power, the violence, the viciousness. If President Kennedy got on television and said, Tonight Id like to introduce the n*ggers in my cabinet, and he yelled n*ggern*ggern*ggern*ggern*gger at every n*gger he saw, boogeyboogeyboogeyboogeyboogey n*ggern*ggern*ggern*gger till n*gger didnt mean anything any more, till n*gger lost its meaning you'd never make any four-year-old n*gger cry when he came home from school.
He believed in freedom of speech, whether it came from the good or bad.
"Take away the right to say 'fuck' and you take away the right to say 'fuck the government'."
I'm done with this. I don't want to derail this thread. Bush has created more hatred, fear and death than three million Ted Nugents.


text:
Datauniverse - New Jersey Public School Teachers and Administrators
Select a school, enter a name or a job title to search for public school educators certified by the state. The list is released once a year by the state Department of Education and provides information about jobs, salaries, types of degrees and years as a teacher as of Oct. 15, 2009. Not all fields need to be filled out. Once on the results page, you may sort various columns from highest to lowest by clicking on the headers. See Pa. Teachers for comparison salaries.
Source: N.J. Department of Education
© MyCentralJersey.com 2009 FAQs DataUniverse.com
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this website, which includes information contained on all links to other sites, is provided as a public service by the Asbury Park Press. The material on this website comes from a number of sources and MyCentralJersey.com does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information, or make any representation as to whether the information is current.
No warranty, express or implied, is created by providing the information on this website. MyCentralJersey.com shall not be liable to anyone for any decision made or action taken, or not taken, in reliance on the information found on this website. Users are advised to do their own independent investigation before relying on or taking/not taking any action based on information found on this website.
Reset your password
We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access.
- Unlimited access to our Web site
- iPad-optimized edition
- Mobile site & iPhone app
You now have full access.
Thank you for subscribing.
- View articles, videos, galleries and more – 24/7
- Access the tablet-optimized site, mobile site and iPhone app
- Share your access with any friend or family member
- Subscriber exclusive Top 5 daily email newsletter
You will automatically receive the MyCentralJersey.com Top 5 daily email newsletter. If you don't want to receive this newsletter, you can change your newsletter selections in your account preferences.


text:
I realise it's bad forum etiquette for a newbie to arrive with their problem and say 'hey here's my problem, help me!'. But in reality I doubt many of you want to hear how many kids I have or the name of my dog. But without getting gushy I genuinely do appreciate folks who frequent forums like this and spend time helping out people they will never meet.
So here's my problem..... please help me ;-)
On Tuesday I purchased a 2005 1.8 Mondeo (Mistral I think) from a dealer in the North.... I Iive down in Kent incidentally.... have one child... and my dog is called Rufus. All seemed good in the world, the car had only done 34K, had history to substantiate this and was in very very good condition. The downside is the previous owner (of 8 years) was averaging 2500K per year and was called Sydney. In my head Sydney is 60+, probably did/does short journeys and wears tartan slippers at home. None the less Sydney was proud of his car and it does show. He pretty much had it serviced when it should have been and everyone who has seen his former car (at my end) has so far been impressed. General consensus is a lot of car for the money.
The dealer I purchased the car from is the smaller independent sort rather than a large main Ford dealer. He has warranted the car for 1000 miles or one month (whichever comes sooner). At the same time I purchased the car I also took out an RAC Gold 1 year warranty through him.
As soon as I drove the car away (cold start) within 5 minutes it stalled as I approached a junction. Obviously alarm bells went off (in my head, not the car)... except I couldn't be 100% sure it wasn't poor clutch control on my behalf having come from a car that felt/drove completely different. So I started the car up (no problem there) and went on my way. The 200 mile journey back to Kent was faultless. The car didn't stall, splutter or do anything that hinted there was a problem.
The next morning I drove the car to work and.... yep it stalled once again within the first few minutes. But again after the initial stall it started up without issue and behaved perfectly for the rest of my journey. However this time I was sure it wasn't dodgy clutch control. I drove the car for another day and concluded that whenever the car is started from cold it stalls (once only) as you approach a junction all within the first 5 minutes. In fact if you really want to see what I mean...... and this is a bit sad I know.... I made this video this morning to illustrate the problem to the dealer who is 200 odd miles from me:
Password: mondeo
You may want to go to 2 mins 20 secs and watch for 10 secs to see the stall scenario.
Realising there's was a significant problem, yesterday I had the Mondeo into a local Ford dealer to check it over. They did a full examination with engine diagnosis check. No fault codes came up but they did experience the stalling problem themselves whilst they had it. Their head chap told me they believe the culprit is the inlet manifold. He said they can't be 100% sure about this, but have had several Mondeos come through with this same issue over the years and in most cases it was the inlet manifold. He told me it would be around £500 to put right, £350 for the part plus labour.
Obviously I haven't gone ahead with the work since the car is warranted with the dealer in the North. But as you can imagine I am in a challenging scenario here. This afternoon I spoke with the dealer up north and told him what the Ford dealer was recommending. He is going to come back to me in the morning with possible ways forward. Obviously it will be expensive and time consuming to drive the car back to his dealership and then get a train back home and do the same in reverse once it is (hopefully) fixed.
As I really don't want to do make this round trip more than once, I need to be sure the problem is fixed. So what do you folks think? Firstly what you think is wrong with the car? In the last 24 hours I've read some troubling accounts in forums from people with similar issues. It seems some found different solutions.... but one or two had spent small fortunes on replacing bits that had not cured the problem. In fact the local Ford dealer told me if it wasn't the inlet manifold the next port of call was a new ECU and after that the wiring. We are talking very big bills if the problem is not located.
The other thing is how do I approach the situation with this dealer in the north? I want to be reasonable and hopefully just get the problem resolved. I realise it's not his fault I live in Kent..... but equally it's not my fault he sold me a car with a fault. What do you folks feel is a fair way to approach this?
Just to give one or two extra bits of information that might be relevant I paid around £2150 for the car plus £140 for the RAC warranty. Also since using the car I've noticed the AC doesn't work (suspect it needs regasing) and there's a water leak in the boot.... which seems to be common on the Mk3 Mondeo and can be fixed by resealing the rear lights.


text:
A Pennsylvania State Police fire marshal has ruled the cause of the fire undetermined, according to Dover Township Volunteer Fire Department Assistant Chief Brian Widmayer.
"He can't pinpoint a cause due to the amount of damage," Widmayer said of the fire marshal. "But it's not suspicious."
Widmayer also said authorities were still working to determine a dollar figure on the amount of damage the fire caused.
Reported Monday:
A fire in Dover Township leveled a garage and destroyed several restored farm tractors and other vehicles inside on Monday night, a fire official said.
Dover Township Volunteer Fire Department Chief Glenn Jansen Sr. said the fire, which broke out around 5:30 p.
"All we could do was keep the fire from spreading to the adjacent house," he said.
Jansen said the cause of the fire was not immediately clear. A state police fire marshal will investigate on Tuesday, he said.
No one was injured, but the garage was a total loss, Jansen said. There was no immediate damage estimate.
"This is not something we normally run into," he said of the old tractors.


text:
|Boxing Champions | Boxing Schedule | Boxing Video | Boxing History | Pound For Pound | Lounge | The Wire | Audio | Arcade
Big Bad Booty Daddy
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 20,782
Quoted: 401 Post(s)
Rep Power: 200000
Points: 2,502,114,971,954.38
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 2,502,114,971,954.38
Comments Thread For: Andy Lee Feels Weight Will Provide The Rematch Edge
Andy Lee feels like he has already won round one against Brian Vera.
By weighing in at the contracted limit of 163 pounds Friday afternoon, the same as Vera, Lee is certain he has given himself a better chance to win their 10-round middleweight rematch Saturday night at Boardwalk Hall (HBO; 10 p.m. EDT/7 p.m. PDT) than he did before their first fight.
[Click Here To Read More]
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: land of no sweet tea
Posts: 12,628
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
Points: 90,740,305,100.54
Bank: 21,891,078,630.25
Total Points: 112,631,383,730.79
Have you guys seen the stoppage of the first fight? GOD AWFUL I'm telling ya - GOD AWFUL. . . . He was still hitting Vera back just as much as he was getting hit! RIGHT BEFORE they stopped it - he landed a picture perfect 1-2; then got caught with a wild overhand right again (he was getting caught a lot), and as the ref stopped it - he was FIRING BACK AGAIN! not just half assed "i don't know where the **** i am/survival" punches - but a CONCENTRATED, ACCURATE, SHOT! i don't know what the ref was thinking. . . . LEE WINS! WAR LEE! WAAARRR DAMNIT!! Watch out for the straight left-right hook combination to finish him off!!!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: IRELAND
Age: 23
Posts: 5,430
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Rep Power: 18
Points: 2,000,000,000,202,418.25
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 2,000,000,000,202,418.25
Up and Comer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: canada by way of dublin EIRE.
Posts: 34
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
Points: 1,884.13
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,884.13
hope andy does the buisness and looks good tonight. would like to see him against sturm in nyc for paddys day next year...or give him a crack at paul williams before martinez..
|Share This With Friends
|Thread Tools
Cookie Policy -
Privacy Policy - Submit
News - Feedback
- Site Map - Advertise
with Us
Copyright © 2003-2015 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2003-2015 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.


text:
Rick Sharga's Rx for Govt. Housing Fix: First, Do No Harm
Aaron Task
Daily Ticker July 18, 2011
Category: Bailouts, Real Estate, Video
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.


text:
500 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116 617-419-4700
Return to Results
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing
so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells.
PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating
patients who have extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Ages:18 and older
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: - Histologically or cytologically confirmed extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) - Malignant pleural effusion constitutes extensive stage disease - Must have disease outside area of prior surgical resection or a new lesion must be present - Controlled brain metastases allowed (asymptomatic and previously treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy) - Brain metastases must be re-evaluated by CT scan or MRI after completion of radiotherapy or surgery PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: - 18 and over Performance status: - Zubrod 0-2 Life expectancy: - Not specified Hematopoietic: - Absolute granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm^3 - WBC at least 3,000/mm^3 - Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3 Hepatic: - Bilirubin no greater than 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN) - SGOT or SGPT no greater than 2.5 times ULN Renal: - Not specified Other: - Not pregnant or nursing - Fertile patients must use effective contraception - No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or other adequately treated stage I or II cancer in complete remission PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: - No prior biologic therapy for SCLC Chemotherapy: - No prior systemic chemotherapy for SCLC Endocrine therapy: - Not specified Radiotherapy: - See Disease Characteristics - No prior radiotherapy for SCLC except for brain metastases Surgery: - See Disease Characteristics - At least 2 weeks since prior surgery (thoracic or other major surgery) and recovered
Investigator Name:
Sponsor: Southwest Oncology Group
Phase: Phase 2
Trial ID: NCT00030433
Not Accepting Healthy Volunteers


text:
Tel: 01439 770466 Email: email@example.com
Gift Vouchers
Tea Shop
Number of Nights123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
Number of Adults1234
Number of Children01234
Book Now
From £179 per couple, per night
Stay in Feb & March and enjoy a half bottle of champagne in the room on arrival, two course dinner from the A la Carte menu,…
Festive Lunches
Available from 1st - 24th December, Monday - Saturday, from 12noon - 2.30pm in The Gallery restaurant
Thurs 3rd - Sun 6th December 2015
Back by popular demand, this winter The Black Swan Hotel will be home for the second time to a pop-up ice rink* which will…
From £149 per couple, per night
The Black Swan Hotel at Helmsley simply comes into its own at Christmas-time. With cosy open fires, crooked floors and original…
One night package from £235 per couple
Gone are the days of a set Tasting Menu, this autumn Head Chef Patrick Bardoulet is offering you the opportunity to devise your…
Two night package from £399 per couple
Gone are the days of a set Tasting Menu, this autumn Head Chef Patrick Bardoulet is offering you the opportunity to devise your…
Sunday night package from £249 per couple
Make More of Mondays and stay with us this Sunday! This great Sunday night deal includes dinner from the 6 course Tasting Menu…
A relaxing one night stay with dinner and a spa treatment from £120 per person.
We're delighted to team up with the Verbena Spa to offer you a fantastic spa break from just £120 per person.
From £132 per person, per night
2 night package, including a chauffeur driven tour of Yorkshire, cream tea on arrival, dinner from The Gallery Menu on one…
Christmas Day Lunch - £115 per person
Why not join us this year for Christmas Day lunch and let someone else do the washing up?
Christmas from £1310 per couple
Spend your Christmas with us - open log fires in our cosy, beamed lounges and the knowledge that you can simply relax and enjoy…
New Year from £850 per couple
Enjoy a two-night fabulous stay to celebrate the New Year at The Black Swan from £850 per couple
Burns Night Dinner priced at £55 per person
This evening will be full of fun and laughter, and we ask you to embrace the evening's quirkiness with a dash of tartan for a…
Save 20% on your Winter 2016 Wedding
20% discount off our Elegantly Classic, Yours for the Day and The Cygnet wedding packages.
Wedding packages from £5300
These 'all-inclusive' packages include everything that you could possibly want for your dream wedding day.
»Home»Black Swan Offers & Events
The Black Swan Hotel
Phone: 01439 770466
To be one of the first to receive details of all the latest news, offers and events at The Black Swan Hotel
Need a gift for someone special but haven't got a clue what to buy them? Why not treat them to a visit to The Black Swan in Helmsley?
Call us on 01439 770466 to request your copy of our hotel brochure, or fill in an online form, and we'll put a copy in the post for you
Copyright © Black Swan at Helmsley 2015. All rights reserved.


text:
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone: 1-717-755-5700
$881 to $1235
More Info
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2½ BA
Phone: 1-888-318-1526
$550 to $1255
Bedrooms: 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 2 BA
Phone: 1-717-846-7368
York PA Apartments & Townhomes For Rent
Quickly find your York, PA apartment from $388 & up. The York Apartment Guide is locally owned and today has a comprehensive list of 31 apartments in the York area. Navigating this site is easy and we offer you many ways to locate your next York apartment home. You can just scroll down through the listings or refine your search by selecting a city,
beds and baths from the top navigation bar which is always in view.
Immediately below you will see our center navigation bar that allows you to find any apartment listing by name or part of a name, this is our Keyword Search. You will also see our Neighborhood, Map and Advanced Search Options. First click Show Map which allows you to enter a location or you can draw your search right on the Map. The search results number will be displayed with all the Short listings right below, click on any short listings to see the detailed listing. As you browse the short listings you can check the Compare box for each listings of interest then compare them in a table to quickly identify which York apartments meets your needs.
Our advanced technology gives you another unique way to find apartments in York and the surrounding area, along with a detailed description of the neighborhood. You will find a complete list at the bottom of the site along with a list of resource articles to assist you with your York Apartment Search. Each Neighborhood information page has a list of apartments in or near that Neighborhood at the bottom of the page. We also have a handy table view of all our York apartments called QUICK REFERENCE.
York and surrounding neighborhood towns offer an abundance of apartments, cultural events, shopping, restaurants, parks and beautiful countryside.
31 apartments found, showing 1 - 31
200 Governours Place
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2½ BA
Phone No: 1-888-318-1526
Check Availability
Recognized with prestigious region-wide awards, Waterford is your next home. Come admire the rolling landscape and majestic trees all while having Interstate 83, Route 30, shopping malls, gas stations, and grocery stores within a... [Read More]
Bedrooms: 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-846-7368
Move-in Special. No Rent until January 1st 2016 for a 15 month lease!!!!! Apply Now! Don't Miss out on this one! Fabulous 3 bedrooms 2 full bathrooms condo located in Central school district.
100 Bridlewood Way
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-755-5700
Enjoy the beautiful landscaping and panoramic views of rolling hills. Shop & dine in the best spots in York, with your easy access to I-83 and Route 30. Relax in the tremendous space of of your one, two or three bedroom apartment ... [Read More]
2035 Patriot St
Bedrooms: 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 1½ BA
Phone No: 1-717-225-2025
$869 to $899
Your life needs room. And plenty of it. At View at Mackenzi, our apartments feature amenities that give you the space you have been seeking. Rooms that flow into one another. And full-sized appliances cleverly situated to provide... [Read More]
102 Lark Circle
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-792-0412
$574 to $999
Lincoln Ridge Apartments is a fine place to call home. The community is well suited for tenants seeking significant value for their rental dollar.
Apartments are equipped with fully appointed kitchens, generous closet space, air ... [Read More]
Cold Springs Drive
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-888-782-3621
$743 to $1180
The comfortable and friendly environment provided at Cold Spring Apartment homes, makes it the perfect choice for your new home. With easy access to Route 30 and Interstate 83 you will love the relaxed small town atmosphere, the ... [Read More]
Green Meadows Drive
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Phone No: 1-717-246-1111
$490 to $695
One, Two, and Three Bedrooms .... From $515 -$785. Two Bedroom Townhomes from $695. Going Fast! Please "Check Availability".
1800 Kenneth Road
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-877-236-1998
$915 to $1220
Relax. Entertain. Work out. Enjoy your elegant new one, two or three bedroom apartment home at The Greens at Westgate, located just off Route 30 and I-83. The Greens is close to shopping, child care, restaurants and York county bu... [Read More]
1700 Yorktowne Drive
Bedrooms: 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-717-767-6907
$820 to $875
2 Bedroom Townhomes ranging from $820.00 - $875.00.
We are nestled in a quiet community with 144 two bedroom townhomes! Stonewood village can offer you all of the amenities and comforts you will need to not only make this your ne... [Read More]
721 South Mountain Rd.
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-432-4700
$520 to $780
BRAND NEW! Located in a quiet rural setting, this newly constructed family community has gorgeous mountain views and offers the best in affordable housing. (Income restrictions apply)
641 Danbury Drive
Red Lion,
Bedrooms: 2 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1½ to 2½ BA
Phone No: 1-717-246-2303
$990 to $1200
Nestled in the countryside of Windsor Township. Two & Three bedroom Townhomes featuring 1 1/2 baths- 2 1/2 baths, some with garages. All homes include full size washer & dryer, ice-maker, microwave, window treatments and more. Mov... [Read More]
301 Friendship Avenue
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 1½ BA
Phone No: 1-717-840-4700
$800 to $900
Set in the natural beauty of York County, Buttonwood Gardens is the perfect place to come home to. Whether you are looking for a One or Two Bedroom apartment, you are sure to find a home spacious enough to fit your life. With only... [Read More]
30G Stony Lane
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-717-292-7073
$655 to $730
The quiet setting of Dovertowne Apartments combines luxury, quality, value, and service all into a superb location. With a convenient route to Interstate 83 and Route 30, you can travel anywhere but still have a clear path back t... [Read More]
261 North Franklin Street
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-855-266-7166
$140 to $791
Historic Charm & Character. Open Floor plans with high ceilings and over-sized windows. Fully equipped modern kitchen with dishwasher. Adjacent to neighborhood park. Close to public transportation. Call 1-855-266-7166
198-A1 Silver Spur Drive
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Phone No: 1-717-577-8025
$665 to $985
One, Two and Three Bedrooms...From $695-$895 ....Rent Includes Heat & Hot Water, water, sewer & trash. Outdoor swimming pool! Country Surroundings, Walking distance to school & shopping, Central School District. Public transporta... [Read More]
104 Camelot Arms, Bldg. L
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-757-6638
$730 to $1150
Don't miss out on the apartment home you've been looking for all along! With convenient access to major highways, quick routes to countless shopping and dining opportunities, and a variety of spacious floor plans to choose from, ... [Read More]
200 Governours Road
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-888-318-1526
$680 to $880
Something for everyone all in one location.
Best of Living Award Winner!
Professionally Managed By: The Apartment Gallery
227 Dietz Estates Drive
Bathrooms: 1½ BA
Phone No: 1-717-885-0067
$975 to $1170
GOING FAST! Two & three bedroom townhomes from $975. Please "Check Availability". Excellent location for Maryland & Harrisburg Commuters, as well as local residents. Microwave, Stove and Dishwasher. Garage Included in select Home... [Read More]
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-866-464-7512
$535 to $850
217 Country Ridge
Red Lion,
Bedrooms: 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 2½ BA
Phone No: 1-717-417-6531
$1299 to $1399
Opportunity Knocks with 3 Full Levels of Sophisticated Living, Enhanced with the Quality you Deserve! Nestled in the Beautiful Countryside of Red Lion and the Award-Winning Dallastown Schools. Please "Check Availability",
42 Oak Ridge Drive
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-741-3829
$1045 to $2285
Powder Mill Apartments is conveniently located in an attractive residential area to the south/east of York, just a short distance from the South Queen Street and I-83 Interchange. There is a weekly shuttle to supermarkets and the ... [Read More]
3205 East Market St.
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-717-757-1737
$720 to $775
One, Two and Three Bedrooms. Heat Included. Fully equipped daylight kitchens, Mini-Blinds, Convenient Shopping and more. Call today or "Check Availability".
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-888-318-1526
$720 to $915
Bedrooms: 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 2 to 2½ BA
Phone No: 1-888-318-1526
$945 to $1240
Cherry Street
Red Lion,
Bedrooms: 2 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1½ BA
Phone No: 717-757-4859
$825 to $925
2 or 3 Bedrooms - Garage or Non-Garage, we have what you are looking for! Garage units are $925 a month and Non-garage units are $825 a month! Pets allowed with restrictions. Call today 717-757-4859
50 Eisenhower Drive
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-717-757-1565
$935 to $2141
Springetts Apartments covers thirty acres of landscaped grounds fronting on both East Market Street and Mt. Zion Road, just east of York and a short distance from the intersection of Mt. Zion Road and the Rt. 30 Bypass. The proper... [Read More]
Emig Mill & Baker Rds.
Bedrooms: 1 to 3 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2½ BA
Phone No: 1-866-528-7414
$759 to $1009
Madison Valley Manor offers comfortable and affordable 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments and townhomes with fireplace s, washer/dryer and private outdoor spaces in York, PA. Enjoy our award winning community with pool, play... [Read More]
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 BA
Phone No: 1-866-464-7512
$126 to $2100
Bedrooms: 1 to 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 1 to 2 BA
Phone No: 1-888-318-1526
$775 to $990
$725 to $935
37 Travis Circle
Bedrooms: 2 BDRM
Bathrooms: 2 to 2½ BA
Phone No: 1-877-763-9277
$830 to $1180
Two Bedroom Apartments and Two Bedroom Townhomes in Beautful Secluded Settings. Skylights, Whirlpool Baths, 1 or 2 Car Garage, Swimming Pool, Fitness and much more. Call today or "Check Availability".
Dallastown, PA Established in 1866 Dallastown has a long history...
Dillsburg, PA Although in York County, Dillsburg is only 15 miles southwest of Harrisburg....
Dover, PA If your a history buff, you've got to check out the home that once belonged to ...
Hanover, PA If you want to see the local economy in action, head to a tour of the Utz and Snyder's facilities. Or, for some fun
Hellam, PA It's a small town that's easy to get to ...
Manchester, PA It used to be know as "Liverpool" but no matters how you refer to Manchester, this place has a deep history...
Red Lion, PA You can't get much more centrally-located than Red Lion ...
Wrightsville, PA Along the western banks of the Susquehanna river you'll find Wrightsville ...
York, PA Many locals refer to this city as "America's first capital" ...
4 York Attractions You Can't Possibly Miss York is known as the "factory capital of the world"
Apartment Decorating - 5 Ideas That Will Make a Dream Space Maybe you want to make guests say "wow" as soon as they walk in.
Apartment Moving Checklist -- Everything You Need for a Smooth Move In order to make sure you don't forget anything, we created this apartment moving checklist:
Apartment Renters' Insurance -- What Do You Need to Know? Think your covered by your landlord's insurance policy, think again!
Apartments and Pets -- How Can the Two Co-Exist? So, you're looking for the perfect apartment, huh? But what about Fido and Fluffy?
Apartments and Your Lease -- 5 Tips to Protect Yourself That apartment lease you're about to sign is a legally-binding document.
Can You Really Shop Til' You Drop in York? Close to all kinds of great shopping opportunities!
Flying into York? Here's How to Make It As Easy As Possible Ready to find the perfect York apartment? Well, you've got to get here first!
Getting Around Greater York -- What Do You Need to Know? Dutch Country is easy to navigate
How Do You Have the Most Fun in York? What exactly is there to do?
Lodging in York -- Where Should You Stay? Finding the perfect York apartment can take some time
Schools in Greater York -- Where Will Your Kids Learn Best? What kind of educational opportunities are there in Greater York?
Setting Up Your York Utilities? Here's Some Valuable Insight! Get all of the necessary utilities turned on and set up
The Top 4 Job Opportunities in Greater York Here are the 4 best job opportunities in the area
Want the Best York Apartment? Follow These 4 Tips Take advantage of these 4 tips
Click to ORDERFREE APARTMENT GUIDE
Sorry! We have not found any apartments that match your search request.Please remove or change some elements and try again


text:
Detention Center
The following information was obtained from the Luna County Detention Center.
Warrant - Robert Montoya, 21, of Silver City, was arrested on a Municipal Court warrant.
Battery - Sarah Cordova, 29, was arrested for aggravated battery against a household member.
If you have information on any crime, call Crime Stoppers, at 546-7800. Callers remain anonymous.


text:
Tyler Embellished Swirl Tee
Style # 570105942
Out of Stock
Printed art swirls across the front of our slubbed cotton tee. The shirt twinkles with the subtle complement of rhinestones and golden studs.
- Mixable, matchable, cozy-chic Zenergy ®: live in, lounge in, love.
- Soft ringspun cotton is lightweight with a fabulous texture.
- Refined, rib-trimmed neckline.
- Length: 24" to 26".
- 100% cotton.
- Machine wash. USA.
Read more… Read less…


text:
Published on December 29th,2011 at 7:54 PM
By >Daimaou - G.G-B
By >Daimaou - G.G-B
A Limited Cover Edition of Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE: '10 CORSE COMO Galaxy Tab Cover'
Category: Accessories - Tags: 10 CORSE COMO Galaxy Tab Cover, 10 CORSE COMO SEOUL, Galaxy, Lte, Samsung, Samsung Galaxy, Samsung Galaxy Ta 8.9 LTE, samsung galaxy tab, Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9
In celebration of the launch of Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE ,Samsung Electronics releases a limited edition of Galaxy Tab cover namely '10 CORSE COMO Galaxy Tab Cover', in collaboration with 10 CORSE COMO, a global lifestyle concept store. The limited cover edition is scheduled to release at 10 CORSE COMO SEOUL located in Chungdam-dong from January next year. The design of the case was created by Kris Ruhs, an international art creator mainly working in Milano and Paris.
Via Samsung
No Comments
Category Accessories
- - Samsung unveils World's First 4G Netbook: N 150 (February 15th,2010 at 5:27 PM)
- - TeliaSonera offers 4G services with Samsung's LTE Dongle (December 16th,2009 at 3:13 PM)
- - Samsung Provides LTE Devices to TeliaSonera for World's First 4G-LTE Service Commercialization (October 23rd,2009 at 12:29 PM)
- - Samsung lance ses premières TV LED 3D en Corée (February 25th,2010 at 6:13 PM)
- - Samsung launches its first 3D LED TV in Korea and Worldwide in March (February 25th,2010 at 4:11 PM)
- - Japan Probe – News from Japan (Subscribe)


text:
Digital Edition
Follow us:
Class I
Short Lines & Regionals
Switching & Terminal
Rapid Transit
High Performance
Light Rail
Freight Cars
Commuter Regional
Subscribe to this RSS feed
Metro-North plans for Penn Station access
MTA Metro-North Railroad could make access to Manhattan's Pennsylvania Station an official priority in its next five-year capital construction program to be released in 2014, despite decades of obstructions confronting…
Wabtec reports record 4Q, full-year results
Wabtec Corp. said Tuesday record fourth-quarter earnings per diluted share of $1.34, 40% above EPS in the fourth quarter of 2011 and topping Wall Street analyst consensus estimates of $1.31.…
NJT begins new TVM rollout
New Jersey Transit has announced the post-pilot-program rollout of its new ticket vending machine (TVM) technology at Newark Penn Station, "kicking off a system-wide rollout that will provide smoother ticket…
Caltrans unveils draft State Rail Plan
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) released the draft California State Rail Plan (CSRP) and plans to hold a series of five open houses and a webinar to gather public…
CN, AMT spar over Montreal locomotive use
A dispute over locomotive operations in the Montreal metropolitan area is pitting CN against regional rail operator Agence Métropolitaine de Transport (AMT). CN, which owns right-of-way used by AMT, is…
Metro-North Danbury Branch electrification eyed
Connecticut State Rep. Gail Lavielle (R-Wilton) and State Sen. Toni Boucher (R-Wilton) are urging fellow lawmakers to make the Danbury branch of Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Metro-North Railroad a priority.
Vision for Central Texas transit unveiled
Project Connect regional partners, after a year of collaborative work and under the leadership of the Transit Working Group led by Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell, unveiled a regional high-capacity transit…
Metrolink set to get Tier 4 locomotives
Southern California's Metrolink will receive funds from the Carl Moyer Program to procure up to 20 new low-emission Tier 4 locomotives. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Governing…
Senate passes Hurricane Sandy relief bill
The Senate Monday, in a 62-to-36 vote, approved an aid package totaling $51 billion for Hurricane Sandy victims, rejecting an amendment to require the relief be offset by cuts to…
LaHood to step down in February
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, says he will leave the Obama administration in February, ending months of speculation over the possibility of continuing in his role during the administration's second term.
Hoboken Terminal recovering; services, Track 8
New Jersey Transit's Hoboken Terminal main waiting room on Monday looked more like a warehouse half-filled with wooden crates than a way station for people, but the waiting room was…
Airport link eyed for SMART rail startup
Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) rail operations, to serve its namesake counties north of San Francisco, may add an airport/rail station stop at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, according…
LIRR eyes two tracks to Ronkonoma
MTA Long Island Rail Road Wednesday said its oft-delayed plans to increase track capacity on its Ronkonkoma Line is back in play. LIRR hopes to double-track 18 miles of the…
House OKs hurricane funds; rail needs included
The House of Representatives late Tuesday approved at least $50 billion in relief aid for victims of Hurricane Sandy, including $5.4 billion for "Department of Transportation-Federal Transit Authority Emergency Relief."
Manhattan ESA link seen boosting home values
A report released Monday says home values in parts of Long Island—a region which has suffered, sometimes dramatically, since the Great Recession—will be greatly aided by MTA Long Island Rail…
MBCR pilot program aids MBTA conductors
Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Co. (MBCR) on Monday announced the launch of the "Conductor Companion" pilot program, using mobile device technology to allow conductors on Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)…
LIRR taps Axion for more ties
Axion International Holdings, Inc. producer of recycled plastic and plastic composite technologies, said it has received a purchase order from the Long Island Rail Road for additional Ecotrax rail ties,…
MBTA anger with Hyundai Rotem heats up
Reports from Boston-area print and television media Friday say Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) is running short of patience over continuing delays of bilevel rail passenger equipment deliveries from Hyundai…
Caltrain raises farebox recovery goals
The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, which owns and operates Caltrain, said late Thursday it is increasing the railroad's farebox recovery goals for Fiscal Year 2014.
NJT: Pre-Sandy service levels to resume Jan. 14
New Jersey Transit Friday announced that as of Jan. 14, it "will restore service levels into New York to 100%, reflecting the agency's ongoing Hurricane Sandy recovery and repair."
Page 51 of 73
Rail Resources
Online Buyer's Guide
Job Board
Webinars & White Papers
More Rail Resources
Industry Links
Industry Events
Books & Training
Most Popular Commuter/Regional
Guelph Subdivision upgraded to CTC
For NJT, a second PEB
Despite some slip and slide, Keolis improves the ride
Cubic extends contract to operate, maintain Brisbane go card system
Soussan replaces Wilder at Siemens Mobility
Contact Us
About Us
Blog Authors
Simmons-Boardman Publishing
Railway Track & Structures Magazine
International Railway Journal
The Railway Educational Bureau
Simmons-Boardman Books
Marine Log Magazine
Banking Exchange
Sign Builder Illustrated
Bar Business Magazine
Copyright © 2015 Simmons-Boardman Publishing Inc.
Scroll To Top
Member Login
Remember Me
Forgot your password?
Forgot your username?


text:
BBB Accredited Business Directory
Businesses you can trust in Phoenix, AZ
Attorneys & Lawyers - Child Advocacy
Filter results
Results for: Attorneys & Lawyers - Child Advocacy in Paz, LA
We did not find any BBB Accredited Businesses that match your search criteria. Please try again.
[ Print Coupon ]


text:
ProFinish Brickmould® 600Vinyl Geometric New Construction Window
Choose from a host of exciting shapes, including Half-round, Quarter-round, Eyebrow, Circle, Triangle, Octagon, Hexagon, Pentagon and Trapezoid, or combine with other window styles to create a custom configuration. Either way, you'll be rewarded with a window that is beautiful, durable and energy efficient.
- Vast array of glass options, grid patterns and styles
- Unique exterior designs that provide strength and beauty
- Fusion-welded frame construction for added strength and stability
ProFinish Brickmould 600 Series
Features & options are not available on all styles.
Series may not be available in all areas of the country.
Styles Available in the Brickmould 600 Series
Energy Efficiency
No Hassles
Built to Weather Life
Beauty that Endures
For more detailed information:
Download our Simonton ProFinish Brickmould® brochure
Maximum Efficiency
Glass Options
- Tempered
- Bronze Tint
- Gray Tint
- Obscure
- SafePoint Impact-resistant Glass
Colorful options. Unforgettable style.
Choose from a wide selection of color and style options to accomplish the look you want. Standard vinyl colors are molded throughout the vinyl for long-lasting beauty. Available on the ProFinish® Brickmould 600 series, Decorum® is a portfolio of unique interior options that allows you to create a look that is distinctively yours. With Decorum, you can select the color, finish and hardware options that complement your home brilliantly.
- white
- driftwood
Download our Simonton ProFinish Brickmould® brochure
- dark woodgrain
- light woodgrain
- brick
- bronze
- chocolate
- cream
- pine
- driftwood
- tan
- Flat
- Sculptured
- Sculptured Brass
- Simulated Divided Lites
Performance Data:
The thermal and structural testing data listed here is for reference only! Contact a Simonton sales representative directly to insure you have the most current information.
Architectural Details:
The following links go to the top architectural resources where you will be able to find technical information that is needed to review and select products and complete the specification process. If you are unable to locate the information you need please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.com.
- Reflections® 5500
- Reflections® 5050
- Asure® Asure
- Impressions® 9800
- StormBreaker Plus® 300VL
- ProFinish Brickmould® 600
- ProFinish Brickmould® 300
- ProFinish® Master
- ProFinish® Contractor
- ProFinish® Builder
- Prism® Platinum
- Prism® Gold
- Prism® Bronze
- DaylightMax® DaylightMax
- Madeira® Madeira
- Verona® Verona
- VantagePointe® 6500
- VantagePointe® 6100
- VantagePointe® 6060
- VantagePointe® 6200
- VantagePointe® ClearValue™


text:
Is Hope Enough For The NY Knicks?
Tonight the Knicks travel to Miamifor game 5 in the semi-finals of the Eastern Conference playoffs. After an exciting and hard fought win on Sunday the Knicks prevented the Heat from sweeping them and forced game 5. With the win Sunday and how the past two games have gone a lot of Knicks fans have hope that the Knicks can still win the series, though they trail 3-1 and no team in NBA history has come back from being down 3-0. In the last two games the Knicks have held the Miami Heat to 87 pts in each game and are 1-1, both games went down to the last minutes. Knicks fans truly believe if they can win tonight they can win the series. They have hope in Melo, Amare and Coach Mike Woodson to lead this team. Knicks fans have hope that Miamiwill choke under the lights and once again not achieve their goal of an NBA Championship. I know that Miami is a better team then NY, their better rebounders, their better defensively and they have a better offensive scheme. So do I think hope is enough for the NY Knicks, NO! Now if the Knicks take the game tonight my opinion may change but I doubt it because Miamijust has to much talent for the Knicks and not to mention as I said before no team has come back from being down 3-0. It hasn't happened because beating a team 4 games in a row in the NBA Playoffs is almost impossible after losing 3 in a row. It's happened in other sports and that's what Knicks fans need to have hope in, that it can happen in basketball! Do you think hope is enough for the NY Knicks? Let me know what you think below and don't forget to always check out SportsZone on the tunein radio app (search clubzone) and on http://clubzone.fm/ from 12-2pm eastern every Monday through Friday!!! You can also call in and voice your opinion at 201-430-2119. This blog is also available on http://www.facebook.com/SportsZoneonClubZone .