text:
New Source Review (NSR) Permitting
Fact Sheet
[June 13, 2002] Acting on the broad-based, bipartisan call for improving the New Source Review (NSR) program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced steps to increase energy efficiency and encourage emissions reductions. EPA today submitted a report on NSR and recommendations for reform to President Bush. As recommended by the 2001 National Energy Policy, EPA reviewed the potential impact of the NSR program on investment in new utility and refinery capacity, energy efficiency and environmental protection.
EPA's review found that the NSR program has impeded or resulted in the cancellation of projects that would maintain or improve reliability, efficiency or safety of existing power plants and refineries. Reforms to NSR will remove barriers to pollution prevention projects, energy efficiency improvements, and investments in new technologies and modernization of facilities.
For more than 10 years and through three administrations, EPA has worked closely with a large and diverse group of stakeholders to find ways to improve the NSR program. During this period, EPA implemented pilot studies and received thousands of comments from state and local governments, environmental groups, industry representatives and private citizens. Over the past year, EPA met with more than 100 environmental and consumer groups and public officials from across the political spectrum, held public meetings around the country, and evaluated more than 130,000 written comments to assess the effect of NSR on the energy sector. Just last summer, the nation's Governors and state environmental commissioners - on a bipartisan basis - both reiterated the call for reform of the NSR program. After a decade of discussion, it is time to act.
Therefore, in addition to the Report to the President, EPA is issuing a document summarizing improvements the Agency intends to make to the NSR program. EPA will be taking these actions to reduce the complexity of the NSR program, promote energy efficiency and pollution prevention, and enhance energy security while encouraging emissions reductions.
These improvements include moving forward to finalize NSR rule changes that were recommended in 1996 and proposing some new changes to the rules. The 1996 recommendations were subject to extraordinarily extensive technical review and public comment over the past six years. EPA will fully involve the public and other stakeholders before finalizing the new proposals.
The actions being taken today will not take away the strong public health protection provided by the Clean Air Act through the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and the programs that ensure their compliance. The key provisions of the Clean Air Act include other programs designed to protect human health and the environment from the harmful effects of air pollution and all those remain in place.
When Congress established the New Source Review Program, it did so with a goal of providing for economic growth while maintaining or improving air quality. Today's announced reforms improve the program to ensure that it is meeting these goals. These reforms will:
- Provide greater certainty about which activities are covered by the NSR program;
- Remove barriers to environmentally beneficial projects;
- Provide incentives for industries to improve environmental performance at the same time they make changes to their facilities; and
- Maintain provisions of NSR and other Clean Air Act programs that protect air quality.
EPA has spent 10 years looking for ways to improve the NSR program. As a follow-up to that work and the previous Administration's proposals to reform NSR, EPA recommends finalizing the following NSR reforms, all of which were originally proposed in 1996:
- Pollution Control and Prevention Projects: To encourage pollution control and prevention, EPA will create a simplified process for companies that undertake environmentally beneficial projects. NSR currently discourages investments in certain pollution control and prevention projects, even if they reduce overall emissions.
- Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs): To provide facilities with greater flexibility to modernize their operations without increasing air pollution, a facility would agree to operate within strict sitenwide emissions caps called PALs. PALs provide clarity, certainty and superior environmental protection.
- Clean Unit Provision: To encourage the installation of statenofnthenart air pollution controls, EPA will give plants that install clean units operational flexibility if they continue to operate within permitted limits. Clean units must have an NSR permit or other regulatory limit that requires the use of the best air pollution control technologies.
- Calculating Emissions Increases and Establishing Actual Emissions Baseline: Currently, the NSR program estimates emissions increases based upon what a plant would emit if operated 24 hours a day, year-round. This makes it impossible to make certain modest changes in a facility without triggering NSR, even if those changes will not actually increase emissions. This common-sense reform will require EPA to evaluate how much a facility will actually emit after the proposed change. Also, to more accurately measure actual emissions, account for variations in business cycles, and clarify what may be a more representative period, facilities will be allowed to use any consecutive 24-month period in the previous decade as a baseline, as long as all current control requirements are taken into account.
EPA is also proposing three new reforms that will go through new rulemaking and public comment processes before they are finalized. These include:
- Routine Maintenance, Repair and Replacement: To increase environmental protection and promote the implementation of necessary repair and replacement projects, EPA will clarify the definition of routine repairs. NSR excludes repairs and maintenance activities that are routine, but a complex analysis must currently be used to determine what repairs meet that standard. This has deterred companies from conducting needed repairs, resulting in unnecessary emissions of pollution and hazardous conditions at these plants. EPA is proposing guidelines for particular industries to clearly establish what activities meet this standard.
- Debottlenecking: EPA is proposing a rule to clarify how NSR applies when a company modifies one part of a facility in such a way that throughput in other parts of the facility increases (i.e., implements a debottlenecking project). Under the current rules, determining whether NSR applies to such complex projects is difficult and can be time consuming.
- Aggregation: Currently, when multiple projects are implemented in a short period of time, a difficult and complex analysis must be performed to determine if the projects should be treated separately or together (i.e., aggregated) under NSR. EPAs proposal will establish two criteria that will guide this determination.
Congress established the New Source Review program as part of the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and slightly modified it in the 1990 Amendments. NSR was designed to help clean up air in areas with air quality problems, and protect air quality in areas where it is good.
Over time, the NSR program has become continually more complex and complicated, due to the evolving nature of industrial practices and changes in the regulations and EPA's interpretation of them. In response to concerns about this, EPA has worked for nearly 10 years to simplify the NSR program.
In 1992, EPA issued a regulation addressing issues regarding NSR at electric utility steam generating units making major modifications. This is referred to as the "WEPCO" rule.
In 1996, EPA proposed to make changes to the existing NSR program that would significantly streamline and simplify the program.
Following the 1996 proposals, EPA held two public hearings and more than 50 stakeholder meetings. Environmental groups, industry, and state, local and federal agency representatives participated in these many discussions. Despite widespread acknowledgment of the need for reforms, EPA did not finalize these proposed regulations in 1996.
In May 2001, the National Energy Policy Development Group issued its National Energy Policy Report. This document included numerous recommendations for action, including a recommendation that the EPA Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy and other relevant agencies, review New Source Review regulations, including administrative interpretation and implementation. The recommendation requested EPA to issue a report to the President on the impact of the regulations on investment in new utility and refinery generation capacity, energy efficiency, and environmental protection.
In June 2001, EPA issued a background paper giving an overview of the
NSR program. EPA solicited public comments on the background paper and
other information relevant to New Source Review. EPA met with more than
100 environmental and consumer groups and public officials, held public
meetings around the country, and
evaluated more than 130,000 written comments EPA evaluated those comments in formulating its report to the President.
EPAs in-depth study of the NSR program has shown that it has an adverse impact on investment in expanding and preserving capacity, as well as in energy efficiency. It found that investment is hindered by (1) regulatory uncertainty and lack of flexibility resulting from the programs complexity, and (2) the added costs and delays imposed by the NSR process the NSR permit process can add a year or more to the time needed to review proposed plant modifications, and cost over $1 million. As a result, many companies delay or abandon plans to modernize their facilities in ways that would benefit the environment. These reforms will facilitate improvements in these facilities that will be good for the environment, such as energy efficiency and pollution prevention projects, while retaining the elements of NSR that protect our air quality.


text:
Information For...
Final Exam Schedule
All final examinations will be given according to the following schedule and will be held in the regularly assigned classrooms.
NOTE: Consult your instructor for Evening Class Exam Schedule. Conflicts in test schedules should be worked out with individual instructors. A student's library records and all financial records must be clear before the student will be allowed to take final examinations in any course.
All library books are due December 10, 2015.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
- home
- about waterfall
- accommodations
- resort services
- dining
- map
- rates & packages
- contact
In 1923, Waterfall Cannery was purchased by Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P Stores) and operated for the next 43 years.
catch up
Receive our free online newsletterJoin Mailing List Photo Gallery
trip planning resourcesPlanning Your Trip Why Waterfall? Fish Chart & Limits Special Offers Group Reservations Get a Fishing License Get Travel Insurance
In the early 1900's, Waterfall was the largest salmon packing plant on the west coast of Prince of Wales Island. Like most canneries in Alaska, this remote operation on the Ulloa Channel was a complete, self- sufficient, temporary community. When the season was over, all but a few workers departed until the next summer's migration.
"For the last 28 years, Waterfall Resort has been our incentive/business destination of choice."
-Rich de Frank, Ford Motor Co.
"Waterfall Resort is one of those special places that words could never adequately describe."
-Bob Morris, American Express


text:
Museo Chicote Nightclub in Madrid
'Museo Chicote' on January 6, 2012 in Madrid, Spain. Opened by Perico... News PhotoArts Culture and Entertainment,Horizontal,Lifestyles,Madrid,SpainPhotographer Juan Naharro GimenezCollection: Getty Images Entertainment 2012 Juan Naharro GimenezMADRID, SPAIN - JANUARY 06: 'Museo Chicote' on January 6, 2012 in Madrid, Spain. Opened by Perico Chicote in 1931, the 'Museo Chicote' is one of the first local of cocktail in Madrid and had a collection of more than 18,000 bottles of liquor. Visited by a multitude of celebrities such as Ava Gardner, Joan Crawford, Liz Taylor, Auntie Hayworth, Sofia Loren, Gina Lollobrigida, Bete Davis, Errol Flynn, Vittorio de Sica, Gary Cooper, Orson Welles, James Stewart Nowadays is the favourite place os many Spanish actors and directors to celebrate cinema awards. (Photo by Juan Naharro Gimenez/Getty Images)


text:
#100 of 197
greeting cards, abstract painting greeting cards, abstract print greeting cards, abstract postcard greeting cards, abstract print on stratched canvas greeting cards, silk art greeting cards, silk print greeting cards, silk postcard greeting cards, silk print on stretched canvas greeting cards, thunderstorm greeting cards, clouds greeting cards, sea greeting cards
"Jamaica" greeting card by Daniel Jean-Baptiste. Ships within 2 - 3 business days and includes a plain white envelop for mailing and/or gift giving. Available in vertical and horizontal orientations.
WORLD'S BEST SILK PAINTING ARTIST. Daniel Gabriel Angelo Jean-Baptiste was born on the Caribbean Island of Saint Lucia , in 1963, to parents of Dutch Jewish and African Carib descent. Jean-Baptiste childhood experience was that of a tiny one street Village of Choiseul, under the shadow of the towering Gros Piton. Spare time was spent fishing off the village�s long wooden jetty, which gave Jean-Baptiste first glimpses of the colourful creatures that inhabited the Caribbean Sea. The plants and fish that intrigued the young boy would later dominate his art. Childhood days were sweet, sweet as perfumed breezes of Saint Lucia. In 1978 he moved to Canada where he was introduced to silk painting during his eight years...
Our return policy is very simple:
If you're not happy with a purchase that you made on FineArtAmerica.com, for any reason, you can return it to us within 30 days of the order date. As soon as it arrives, we'll issue a full refund for the entire purchase price. Please note - Fine Art America does not reimburse the outgoing or return shipping charges unless the return is due to a defect in quality.
Fine Art America sells thousands of pieces of artwork each month - all with a 100% money-back guarantee.
If you've hesitated to purchase artwork online in the past, why not give us a try? You have nothing to lose!
We take great pride in the fact that hundreds of thousands of artists have chosen Fine Art America to fulfill their orders, and we look forward to helping you select your next piece!
Customer Service: 877-807-5901
(Call Any Time - 24 Hours Per Day)
All greeting cards ship from our production facility within two business days of your order.
Please Wait...
Beverly Hills, CA (United States)
Sign up for our newsletter for exclusive deals, discount codes, and more:
Unsubscribe at any time.
Server Status OK
Copyright © 2015 FineArtAmerica.com - All Rights Reserved


text:
home > motorcycle insurance
or call 1-866-455-1980
(daily, 5 a.m.–9 p.m. PT)
Top 3 reasons to get your quote through Esurance:
You can count on motorcycle insurance through Esurance to protect your bike, no matter what kind of ride you own. More [+]
Every policy is built to save you money, with flexible payment options and knowledgeable customer service you can rely on 24/7, every day of the year.
Whether you just bought a bike or you're ready to shop for a new policy, get a free quote online for coverage that provides you with added security and peace of mind.
As a proud member of the Allstate family, we're backed by the strength and experience of a longtime industry leader. With a financial-strength rating of "Superior" from A.M. Best, a respected insurance rating organization, you can trust that we'll be there when you need us most.
We value insurance that helps you make smarter decisions. You can take advantage of our hassle-free experience, competitive prices, and innovative tools to take direct control of your policy.
Online motorcycle coverage protects most bikes, including street bikes, cruisers, touring bikes, standard motorcycles, scooters, touring motorcycles, dirt bikes, trikes, classics, and other 2-wheeled rides. More [+]
Motorcycle policies come in all shapes and sizes, too. So whether you've got a Harley-Davidson or a Vespa, we can help you find the right policy.
Most riders are required to have at least bodily injury and property damage coverage. You can, however, choose to round out your policy for better protection. Specific coverages may include:
Learn more about what's covered >
When you get a free quote online or over the phone, you should have the following information handy: More [+]
Even if you've not bought your bike yet, you can still get a free quote as long as you know what type of ride you'd like to purchase. You can then choose coverages, deductibles, and limits for the bike(s) you have in mind.
Motorcycle rates vary depending on coverage levels and other factors. For example, certain coverages are not available in some states and may be required in other states, and legally required coverage minimums may differ from state to state as well. More [+]
The make, model, and year of the bike in question will also partially determine how much you pay.
Our commitment to providing the best motorcycle insurance quotes begins with a wide range of discounts. Here's a sampling:
If you have questions about an existing policy or need to make a claim, here's how you can get in touch.
Mailing address:
Esurance Customer Service
P.O. Box 5250
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5258
Fax: 1-800-926-2889
Phone: 1-800-ESURANCE (1-800-378-7262)
Hours: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
For motorcycle policies not underwritten by Esurance, visit our contact page.
Learn more about coverages that protect you and your ride, from roadside service to transport trailer coverage.
Read up on how to file a claim, ways to expedite the process, and what to expect after you file.
Take a peek at all the ways you can save on your motorcycle policy with our array of unique discounts.
Get state-specific insurance info, including required and optional coverages for your bike.
connect with us
Contact us | Privacy & security | Insurance rating & licenses | Terms of use | Site map
© 2015 Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. All rights reserved.
Motorcycle insurance policies underwritten by Esurance are available only in certain states. Coverage and discount availability varies by state and/or individual risk situation. Motorcycle insurance quotes, in states where Esurance motorcycle insurance is not available, are provided by Answer Financial, Inc. Motorcycle insurance quotes are not available in D.C. Esurance does not underwrite, provide customer service, or pay claims for any motorcycle policies sold by Answer Financial.


text:
Test Preparation
Got a quiz or test coming up? You'll be a lot more ready to tackle it after you watch this BrainPOP movie on test preparation! In it, Tim and Moby guide you through the things you should do when you hear you're going to have a test. Find out how you can make sure you'll have plenty of time to study and why you shouldn't cram. You'll also learn what to do with all those notes you took in class and why a study group can be useful. Finally, see how to approach the day of the test, including what foods you should and shouldn't eat. Study hard, and good luck!
Learn More:How can I take better notes so that I can be prepared for my tests?What is cramming? Does it work?How can I improve my study skills?
See a Full List of Topics


text:
YIELD: Makes 3 large and 4 small eggs
IngredientsFor chocolate shells
- 2 1/2 pounds bittersweet (not unsweetened) chocolate, chopped
- 3 large plastic egg mold trays* (to make six 4 1/4 x 3 x 1 1/4-inch 1/2-cup-capacity egg halves)
- 2 small plastic egg mold trays* (to make eight 3 x 2 1/2 x 1-inch 1/4-cup-capacity egg halves)
- 1 1/3 cups whipping cream
- 7 tablespoons unsalted butter, diced
- 2 tablespoons sour cream
- 2 tablespoons vanilla extract
- 1 1/3 cups English toffee bits (such as Skor)
- 1/2 1-pound package royal icing mix*
- 1 1-ounce jar brown gel coloring*
- 1 pastry bag*
- 1 1/4-inch-diameter star pastry tip (for large eggs)*
- 1 1/8-inch-diameter star pastry tip (for small eggs)*
- Revolving cake stand (optional)*
- Assorted purchased royal icing decorations*
- *Available at cake and candy supply stores
Make chocolate shells:
Using rubber spatula, stir chocolate in large metal bowl set over saucepan of simmering water until smooth and candy thermometer registers 115°F. (do not allow bottom of bowl to touch water). Remove from over water.
Place 1 tray of large egg molds on work surface; if necessary, place folded dish towel under tray to level. Spoon chocolate into egg molds, filling completely (do not fill embossed mold). Quickly invert tray over bowl of chocolate, allowing excess chocolate to drop into bowl. Shake tray gently to produce uniformly thick chocolate shells. Run fingertip around edges of shells to remove excess chocolate. Chill tray.
Set bowl of chocolate back over simmering water and re-warm to 115°F., stirring frequently. Repeat coating and chilling process with remaining trays of egg molds, rewarming chocolate over simmering water to 115°F. after coating molds in each tray. Reserve remaining chocolate at room temperature in bowl for use in filling and assembly.
Make chocolate-toffee filling:
Stir cream and butter in heavy medium saucepan over medium heat until butter melts and mixture comes to boil. Remove from heat. Add 1 2/3 cups reserved melted chocolate; whisk until smooth. Whisk in sour cream and vanilla; fold in toffee bits. Let stand at room temperature until cool and slightly thick but still pourable, stirring occasionally, about 1 hour.
Spoon enough filling into each chilled chocolate shell to come within 1/8 inch of top edge, about 6 tablespoons for large chocolate shells and 3 tablespoons for small chocolate shells. Refrigerate until filling is firm, about 2 hours.
Rewarm remaining chocolate in bowl over simmering water until thermometer registers 115°F., stirring frequently. Remove from over water. Quickly spoon enough melted chocolate over filling in each shell just to fill. Using offset spatula, spread chocolate over filling to seal to edges, scrape off excess chocolate and level top. Refrigerate all trays until top layer of chocolate is very firm, at least 2 hours. Reserve remaining chocolate at room temperature in bowl.
Place large sheet of foil on work surface. Turn 1 tray over just above foil. Twist and bend tray to release egg halves onto foil. Unmold remaining egg halves. Rewarm chocolate in bowl over simmering water until thermometer registers 115°F., stirring frequently. Remove from over water. Turn bottom egg halves (those with small flat base) so that large flat side faces up. Spread small amount of melted chocolate over large flat side of 1 egg bottom, leaving 1/4-inch border at edge. Immediately place corresponding egg top on chocolate and press gently to adhere. Wipe away any excess chocolate from seam. Place whole egg on foil-lined baking sheet and refrigerate. Repeat with remaining egg halves and melted chocolate. (Assembled eggs can be prepared 2 weeks ahead. Cover; keep refrigerated.)
Make decoration
Prepare icing according to package directions; gradually mix in enough brown gel to reach desired shade. Spoon some icing into pastry bag fitted with star tip.
Place 1 chocolate egg on revolving cake stand or on small round of foil on work surface. Holding tip of pastry bag close to egg, pipe 1 continuous line of icing decoratively onto seam, turning cake stand or foil as necessary. (Do not pipe unconnected designs such as stars onto seam; they break off easily.) To attach purchased icing decorations, use a toothpick to dab melted chocolate onto bottom of decoration, then affix to egg.
Return decorated eggs to foil-lined baking sheet. Chill until icing sets, about 2 hours. (Can be made 1 week ahead. Keep chilled in large plastic containers.)


text:
May 15, 12
Social Media Pulse
Mar 4, 11
Industry Research
Simplify360 is a Social Business Intelligence Platform which enables businesses to communicate with their customers on Social Media.
Learn more about our products and services.
Social Media Monitoring
Social Media Marketing
Social Media Analytics
Social Customer Service
© Simplify360 2013 TOS Privacy policy
Follow Us :


text:
Quoting the results of a poll funded by a lobbying group known as the Small Business Majority, the Central Valley Business Times (CVBT) of Stockton, California, announced that a majority of small-business owners now support raising the minimum wage. The Times iterated the hoary refrain that such a raise "would enhance consumer spending which can increase the demand for small firms' goods and services" and added that not only would such a raise "allow low-income workers to more easily support themselves … [but it would also relieve] pressure on taxpayer-financed government assistance programs."
John Arnsmeyer, the founder and CEO of Small Business Majority (SBM), repeated the theme:
By raising it across the board, more Americans will have more money to spend at small businesses. This will help them create jobs which strengthens the economy overall.
The economic domino effect raising the minimum wage would have would be significant.
Another lobbying group, Business For a Fair Minimum Wage, echoed Arnsmeyer and the Times, claiming that
Increasing the minimum wage will help the economy because the people with the lowest incomes are the most likely to spend any pay increases buying necessities they would not afford before, which will boost sales at businesses.
This will increase the customer demand that businesses need to retain or hire more employees.
Henry Hazlitt, the author of Economics in One Lesson, no doubt thought he had put the matter to rest back in 1946 when he gave this explanation:
You cannot make a man worth a given amount by making it illegal for anyone to offer him anything less. You merely deprive him of the right to earn the amount that his abilities and situation would permit him to earn, while you deprive the community even of the moderate services that he is capable of rendering.
In brief, for a low wage you substitute unemployment.
A shortcut to understanding the fallacy of the minimum wage is simply to ask: If raising the minimum wage to $9 per hour as proposed by President Obama or to $10.50 an hour as proposed by Ralph Nader makes so much sense, why not make everyone wealthier by raising it to $20 an hour, or $50, or $100?
Click here to read the entire article.


text:
(NBC) -- Today, the Nation's governors tell President Obama how they think we can avoid going over the fiscal cliff...
Which Washington insiders say looks even more likely now that Republicans have put their offer on the table.
Your paycheck will shrink, if congress can't agree on how to prevent it. The White House says this latest offer from Republicans isn't even a start.
Six governors - Democrats and Republicans - weigh in on the fiscal cliff today.
What will they tell President Obama about the spending cuts and tax increases... Now just 28 days away? "We must rein in our out of control spending," said Rep. Joe Wilson (R) South Carolina
Republicans have an offer: 800 billion in new taxes - half what the president wanted.
600 billion saved, in part, by making Americans wait till they're 67 to get Medicare.
Plus more cuts, totaling two-point-two trillion - and no tax hikes for the wealthy. "That's just not going to happen." Jay Carney/ White House Press Secretary
The Pentagon could take the biggest hit, but President Obama told defense experts Monday, don't worry: "Even as we make some very tough fiscal choices, we're going to keep investing in these programs." President Barack Obama
And he went online - on YouTube, and twitter, explaining why he thinks the rich should pay more.
The auto industry warned: going over the fiscal cliff could cost America jobs. "We're only expanding around two percent right now. It needs to be considerably higher to bring more people off of unemployment." Alan Mulally/ President & CEO, Ford Motor Co.
But for the jobless, President Obama's asking congress for millions more.
The President's plan, which he'll pitch to the governors today, largely spares Medicare and Social Security.


text:
- Musician's Friend Best Selection, Price & Service. Guaranteed.
Call our Gear Heads
at: 800-449-9128
Call our Gear Heads
at: 800-449-9128
Give each performer their own monitor mix.
This pack includes the Behringer Powerplay PRO-8 HA-8000 Headphone Amp and four AKG K99 headphones.
Behringer Powerplay PRO-8 HA-8000 Headphone Amp
The Behringer Powerplay PRO-8 is a professional, high-power multipurpose 8-channel headphone distribution amplifier. It features 8 totally independent stereo high-power amplifier sections in one rackspace, 2 separate main inputs, 2 headphone outputs per channel and even a dedicated direct input for each channel. The headphone amp offers the highest sonic quality with virtually all types of headphones, even at maximum volume.
The K99 headphones are semi-open and offer you excellent stereo sound at an optimum price. Self-adjusting headband, and low weight ensure pleasant fit. Large, high-performance 1.6-inch (40-mm) speakers provide natural, uncolored sound.
AKG K99 headphones are perfect for your listening enjoyment with leatherette earpads that allow comfortable extended wear. You get a very accurate listening experience, thanks to an 18Hz-22kHz frequency range. AKG makes great headphones for a variety of applications, from studio monitoring to home listening. If you want to plug into a computer, CD player, or MP3 player and experience great sound, then these AKG headphones are ideal.
Order today and give everyone ears for listening, recording, or silent rehearsals.
HA8000/K99 Headphone Four Pack
Our product catalog varies by country due to manufacturer restrictions. If you change the Ship-To country, some or all of the items in your cart may not ship to the new destination.