text:
Forgot Password?
Create an account to share your experiences and more!
Auto Log-in Future Sessions
(on this computer).
Feedback History
A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User :
(66) |
(23) |
(19) |
Replies Received
(47) |
Trust Ratings
All Activity
A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown :
Page :
Next Page
Feedback / Review
Velvet Ecstasy
Current Member
over 1 month
(at the time of review).
-I agree with the previous reviews. There is real amateur porn here, some of it quite refreshing.
-There are several hundred videos here.
-About 1 in 8 of the videos have real chemistry, affection, and the woman gets aroused and in some cases has orgasms.
-The price of $14.95/month is great.
-Some of the bonus photos (from other sites) are 1024 pixels and quite worth saving, especially from Met-Art and Hegre.
-If you like facials (I don't) you can download the facial excerpt from every video here, separately from the long main video.
-Good support. Victor thanked me for pointing out a couple of errors, and responded politely and substantively to my suggestions.
-The super closeups don't last very long, and they hush the annoying music when the action gets hot so you can hear the actors.
-Victor, the proprietor, insists on a facial in every video, which I detest. He seems to insist that every woman say "I want you to come in my face" in every video. This seems to me ridiculous and demeaning to both parties.
-Victor's direction seems to me to push many of the amateur couples into attempting standard (boring) porn. In particular, the guys hold off too long and end up jacking themselves off, which I find very unerotic. I wish he'd let them do what they want. Some of the more creative couples do manage quite interesting things anyway.
-So even for the amateur couples, the sex is usually unrealistic (guy holding off for way too long, no creampies, running thru standard positions mechanically).
-About half of the videos consist of a non-amateur giving a BJ to Victor, ending in a facial. These don't appeal to me at all. But the other half are mostly real amateur couples, and about 1 in 4 of those I found to be erotic.
Bottom Line:
I have never kept my subscription into a second month except here. The quantity of videos, photos, and bonus photos kept me going thru the 2nd month. I ended up keeping about 90 videos. Thus I rate this site better than KarupsHA (I kept 40-some) and
(I kept only about 20 from each).
is fantastic for the money!
They have real amateur couples and it could be great porn if they would only stop forcing them into porn cliches -- let the couple do sex the way they like it (not trying to make "porn"), let the guys cum when they want to, no facials, some creampies. There are a handful where the guy comes more than once (nice!). If the girl likes it after the guy cums, let him satisfy her orally or use a vibrator or both. Also, like most sites, it would help so much to have accurate descriptions of the videos. Do the girls orgasm in an obvious and convincing way? More than once? This is hardly ever mentioned in the descriptions, and "Orgasms" is not one of their categories!
There are very few girl-girl videos and few solo girls that really cum. I don't mind this, but don't come to this site if you want these.
OK, if your taste agrees with mine (boy/girl scenes with real chemistry, laughing, fun, real arousal, real female orgasms, no fake moaning, guy coming from sex not jacking) here are some lists that will give you a huge advantage. My picks for the best are grouped first. (Numbers like _06, _07 are years released, but I stopped keeping track in later years -- the good videos span all years of the site.)
bodyrub_sensual_not_the_usual_06, dancingdick_08, laptease_06, laptease-bonus, mysistersfriend, oilylizzie, pointsofinterest, quickdraw, rainysunday_08, squealsofecstasy_07, squealsofecstasy_interview_07, taketwo, velvetkarma, witchyways_07.
autumnshakes_07, backyardbang_06, bellyrub_07, birthdaybuttfuck, lovelyrita, morningpayback, newyearpop, sexualhealing_07, studybreak, tremors, wyldfire_07, wyldfire_bts_07, zombigasms.
anteupmyass, barelynineteen, beantownbang, blindpresent_06, bustinout_08, chocolateoil_08, comeoutswinging_06, flooded_06, foothold, gisellesrub, gisellesrub_introduction_07, havingfaith_06, homemade_06, lovebites, lubingcallie, milkandhoney, poleposition, prettymama, redpassion, squirtgirl, tightfit, wetnwild, whippedfudge.
Young Models
Was a member approx.
4 months
prior to this review.
- Occasional vids with horny young girls who forget they're on camera (or like it) and come and come and come.
- Directing does not get in the way of real arousal and chemistry when it happens.
- Pretty young girls, some handsome young guys.
- Good videography, well lit, some closeups but they don't go on too long. Mostly you can see whole bodies.
- Special $20/month (NETBilling), recurring, cancellation easy.
- Full access to all 12 of their sites for one fee.
- I downloaded wmv; not sure if they offer other formats.
- I had no problem with downloading speed, seemed smooth and reliable.
- Photo sets available as well as vids, but I didn't pay much attention to photos b/c I prefer videos.
- Most of the vids are standard fare with no female orgasms, no chemistry, nobody having fun or getting aroused -- just fast HC banging. You have to look hard to find the few wonderful gems listed below.
- Resolution is good but not HD.
Bottom Line:
- Resolution is good but not great, mostly 640 x 480 pixels, some on Creampies were 480 x 360. Most files I downloaded were 200 - 250 megabytes.
What I liked a great deal about YM is that I was able to find a few scenes where amateur-looking girls were very horny, seemed to forget (or enjoy) that they were on camera, and just came and came and came. My favorite was Sabrina, a tiny brunette who came with oral, jumps into a vigorous CG coming in about 3 minutes, and again in a couple more minutes. She is definitely using the guy! Next she comes in mish and at least twice again in K9. End is a disappointing tired jack off on her face. Sabrina has a large vine tattooed wrapped around one leg, which I found quite hot.
Another favorite is Ginger. I've seen this blonde model on other sites, but here she really comes hard, first to oral, then to CG and RCG, then she pumps away in K9 but doesn't seem to come, then comes in mish. This ends a little better with the guy withdrawing and immediately coming over her tits.
Other gorgeous comealot girls are Sammy (tho she has an ugly tattoo), and readhead Brandimay, who has a cute giggly personality.
A subscription to YM includes access to a bunch of other sites:
, Interracial,
, and
. Not being into anal or g/g, I didn't visit all of these. I found scenes that I liked a lot at the first three.
Dripping Creampies (videos are labeled CreampieFucking): Denisa is a gorgeous model who really enjoyed the sex and appeared to me to be multiorgasmic, tho quiet about it.
Barbie Cummings
has a nice short scene where the guy comes in a normal (short) amount of time. Lorena's scene has a great throbbing dick closeup, coming inside, as do those with Nikki and Stacey.
At Interracial (videos are labeled InterracialSlut), Lisa Marie, Christie, and Brooke (all white) are multiorgasmic and fun.
(videos are labeled AmateurCouplesSex), there's good chemistry, affection, and cumming aplenty in Heather (Silky) and Rick, Missy and Dave, and MacKenzie and Noah.
BOTTOM LINE: While there is not much real arousal or excitement or fun in most of the videos at these sites, there are enough gems (listed above) that I found a one-month subscription well worthwhile. Those gems illustrate how it is possible, when the director doesn't interfere too much, for the rare horny porn stars with personality and couples who like sex and exhibitionism to be genuinely aroused and erotic. If your tastes agree with mine (see my profile, and the forum thread "Against the grain"), you'll know just which scenes to download first.
These sites also have photo sets, but I'm not into static photos much so I didn't pay much attention to those.
Massage Rooms
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
-Spontaneity! Each video is different -- not the same positions or activities in the same order. Many delicious female orgasms!
-Gentle, respectful, attentive to the woman. -Unhurried and dreamy.
-No facials, no anal.
-Guys never jack themselves off.
-No fake boobs; beautiful women mid to late 20s.
-Downloads fast, ~2 gigs/sec.
-Downloaded files named with video number and name.
-Downloads available in several resolutions including HD, .wmv or .mov or lower definition for mobile formats.
-Photosets downloadable in zip sets.
-Good lighting and sound.
-Georges cock is normal sized.
-Music is calm and unintrusive and fades out when the action gets hot.
-Lighting and sound are excellent.
-Navigation is good but unnecessary due to limited content.
-Very limited content: only 23 videos. Nevertheless, for me, a one month subscription ($25) was well worthwhile because of the uniquely erotic content.
-Only 23 photo sets, generally a bit over 100/set. 1200, 2000, 4000 pixel zip files or individual photos from thumbnails.
-Photos have really poor composition -- too close or too far, bad angles, completely fail to capture the beauty of the women!
-Link most popular videos lists all videos.
-One stunt cock in most fucking scenes, George.
-Videography is OK but spends too much time with extreme closeups. There are some very nice scenes showing whole bodies but more intermediate zooms would be better.
-Some female orgasms seemed fake to me, but there are some great ones too.
-HJ by Rita on men not very creative, no edging.
-Women are often not very passionate.
Bottom Line:
This site is not for everyone -- but it is exceptionally well matched to my tastes: slow, gentle, respectful sex, attentive to the womans arousal and climaxes with no facials, no anal, and no guys jacking themselves off. Usually most of the ~20 min in each video is massage, tho some are over half fucking. There is a mix of ejaculations after pulling out from fucking, creampies, and hand jobs. Not every video has oral sex of either kind, but some do. When there is fellatio, it does not go on way too long like in most commercial porn.
Videos are of 3 types: George (the main stunt cock) on woman; Lola on woman; woman on man (usually not George). What amazed me is the spontaneity. There is no formula for any of the 3 types. Different massage techniques, sensual and sexual activities occur in each video, with different amounts of time. The participants are sensitive to each others responses. Sometimes the massage doesnt get very far before fucking starts. Sometimes fucking is initiated by the woman, sometimes by the man. Sometimes the breasts get massaged, usually the pussy, but not always. Unlike most commercial porn, there is no director telling them to spend 5 minutes in each of 5 positions/activities in the same order in every video, without regard to arousal and response.
There is always an effort to get the woman to orgasm, usually manually or orally. Often only one female orgasm. No vibrators are used and the women are not tortured to cum over and over beyond what is pleasant (cf.
massage videos, which are nevertheless quite spectacular). There is no fake moaning. Sometimes her orgasm is believable, sometimes strong and body-shaking, but sometimes I had doubts. Maybe some of the women just have quiet/mild orgasms. Generally neither the women nor the men showed a lot of passion -- they took their time to get aroused and let it build. Lola, who is the main masseuse in the girl-girl videos, does some nice edging! Occasionally so does George. On the other hand, Rita, who does most of the hand jobs in girl-on-guy massage videos, needs to improve her finishing technique -- it is simply fast and hard. Her work up is very sensual, but then the end is mechanical. She needs to learn edging and study tantric lingam massage techniques.
Video resolution is excellent. I downloaded exclusively the 720 pixel MOV files which I found completely satisfactory. Most videos are about 30 min long and (at 720 pixels) about 1 gigabyte per video. So you may end up with well over 10 gigs of videos from this one site.
Language is not English (Czech?) but there is very little dialog, and there are subtitles.
The main problem is the very limited amount of content. This is a new site: the first video is dated late December, 2012. Updates are coming a little more often than one per week. The second big negative is the poor composition in the photos. Its amazing how there can be 100 photos of gorgeous people having sex, yet none of them capture the beauty of what you see in the videos. I was able to take screenshots from the videos that I found much better than the photos in their sets. It makes me suspect that the stills are auto-captured every so many seconds from the videos with no human artist involved. To be fair photos are not my thing and I only looked at 2 of their sets. The stills are available in 1200, 2000 and 4000 pixels but I didnt study them to see if there is truly more resolution in the 4000 than in the 2000.
I deleted only 7 of the 23 videos because I found them passionless. I kept the other 16, a much higher percentage than in fact any other porn site I can recall!
My favorites:
George on Alex. Alex is responsive and dark skinned which I love. He gets her off manually, and then she gets herself off in cowgirl position. At the end they are fucking and George pulls out and squirts satisfyingly over her tummy.
Lola on Zuzana. I usually dont go for girl on girl videos but this one is spectacular. Zuzana develops amazing sexual tension in response to Lolas pussy petting and finger fucking -- her whole body stiffens. Its like Lola pushes her over the edge and out of control. Her first orgasm is mostly release, but her second is dramatic with bucking and shaking. Zuzana is curvier than the other girls and both I, and evidently Lola, find her very erotic. At the end, Lola humps Zuzanas buttocks and gradually climbs to a powerful orgasm -- probably the best orgasm Lola shows in any video (in most videos, hers are on the quiet side or even unconvincing). But theres no doubt about this one!
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- All the girls are young and beautiful.
- No breast implants!
- No anal!
- The guys are usually gentle and considerate with the girls, unlike e.g.
where they are fast, hard, and rough.
- Video .wmv files are named systematically, with the actress' name, unlike some sites where the filename is a meaningless number.
- Nearly all videos are well lit. But see cons!
- All the guys manage to stay hard (or the limp parts are edited out). Here, you'll never have to watch long scenes of an actress sucking on a limp dick to no avail.
- Bad support? I emailed pointing one failure of their search engine and suggesting remastering some great early vids at higher resolution, and never received a reply.
- No descriptions, no ratings, no "most viewed" -- you're on your own with >500 videos.
- Same few stunt cocks in nearly all videos. They seem mechanical and bored. Often they skip any oral on the girl, and they are rarely heard to complement the girl on her looks or sexiness or to be romantic or intimate. Their demeanor does not bring out the most erotic side of the girls. It takes a girl who is incredibly horny or really loves sex or has a special personality to shine under these circumstances -- most don't.
- Uninspired directing. Most scenes follow the same boring mechanical sequence in a bedroom.
- Most scenes end in a ridiculous facial, usually after the guy jacks himself for quite some time. How NOT sexy is it to hear Jimmy say "open your mouth, NOW!"? Give me a break!
Bottom Line:
Very recent files are HD, recent files are medium resolution (640 x 480), and older files are low resolution (360 x 240). However, at full screen I couldn't see much difference between the medium and low resolution -- so I suspect the medium is empty magnification of the low. WMV is the only available format. No problem -- with free Flip4Mac I played them all in Quicktime on OS X. All videos are divided into four scenes of about 7 minutes each. The inability to download a whole video as one file is annoying.
There are tons of still photos. The resolution is OK but not great (700 x 1000 to 1000 x 1500 pixels; file sizes 200 - 600 kilobytes).
The vast majority of the scenes are without condoms. To me, this is very unfortunate, since Jimmy, the guy in 80% of the scenes, has now fucked hundreds of young women without a condom. I gather that market forces demand this (or porn companies think they do?), but how many young people have to get HIV before this stops? On the pro side, in the occasional scenes where a condom is used, they don't try to hide it, occasionally even showing it being rolled on by the girl -- definitely a pro in my book.
Well, I took one for the team and sifted through all 300-some boy/girl videos looking for the occasional gem. Here are my favorites. You can search by the first name of the actress to find these. These are the full filenames, except for the a/b/c/d that divide each video into 4 scenes.
There are some very early, lo-res scenes with what might be real couples (real amateurs?!) that are the hottest on the site, to my taste (see my profile). Of course I prefer crisp videos where you can see the body down, but real intimacy, arousal, and chemistry trump resolution any day in my book. (It would be great if KarupsHA would see fit to re-release these early hot vids in higher resolution!) Examples:
sativa-bg-1: She is incredibly naturally sexy. He and she interact naturally, with affection and intimacy. The KarupsHA camerapeople and stunt cocks could learn from this one. No jerky camera work. No rushing from position to position - sex is fun, not a race. No closeups that hide the beautiful people.
kat170-bg-1 is another great early low-res video. Nice foreplay, real passion, lots of kissing, real intimacy and caring. I thought this one could hold up to comparison with the better boy-girl videos at
(except for its poor resolution).
evita-bg012 and evita-bg039 are very hot! Needs remastering at higher res.
Turning to more recent scenes that are medium resolution with the stunt cocks:
Valerie is one of the most amazing and erotic pro-am women I've seen (both here and on Nubiles, same name) because she is really horny, completely natural, and cums intensely over and over. She says she needs sex 14 times/week, but is getting it only 3-4 times/week from her boyfriend (valerie-bg-6). In valerie225-bg-2, ... OUT OF ROOM HERE, WILL TRY TO PUT REMAINDER IN A "REPLY".
Dare Dorm
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
-Most videos seem to be real students, not porn actors.
-Never the same people in any two videos.
-Couples unashamed to lick, suck, fuck and sometimes have orgasms while being watched and cheered by their peers. Wonderful openness and acceptance of sexuality -- perhaps the greatest feature of this site.
-Variety of female breast sizes (almost none enhanced) and body types, all very attractive.
-About 95 videos.
-Updates about twice a month.
-Fake passion/moaning is quite rare.
-No director telling them to run thru set positions without regard to their responses. For the most part they do what feels good.
-Mix of creampies, squirt over tummy or butt, and facials.
-A few BJ with CIM and spit or swallow.
-Lighting and resolution are generally fine.
-Good tech support with live chat that actually works.
-Videos can be sorted by most viewed, highest rated, or newest.
-Streaming only. No download mechanism offered. I would give it a higher numeric score except for this. The mechanism to skip to another part of a video does work.
-Very amateurish videography, often blurry, jerky, too close. Well, its taken by one of the students. Sometimes a girl cums loudly off camera.
-Most of the sex is not very passionate -- but hey, its done in front of friends by amateurs while being videoed. And it is young person down-to-business hard sex, not much foreplay.
Bottom Line:
I was very pleasantly surprised. I expected to see passionless porn pros in a dorm, or possibly porn actresses with real student men (which could be very hot -- haven't found such a site but wish I could). A few of the videos seem like strippers who aren't interested in sex making out with guys with big cocks -- as expected. But most seem to be geniune submissions by groups of student friends/peers. I suspect that some of the girls are strippers when they're not in class. There isn't a lot of passion, but there's a lot of openly shared, enthusiastic sex.
Condoms are used about half the time.
The first half or more of each video (they run 30-70 min in general) is conversation and partying -- often with spin the bottle and truth or dare games. Some of the conversations among groups of girls is quite interesting, about their sexual experiences and preferences. Towards the last half or third of each video, usually a few of the girls don't mind taking their clothes off and then having sex in front of a bunch of friends who still have their clothes on and are cheering them on. Possibly they are having sex with their boyfriends, tho in some cases there are 3somes.
The one thing that seemed possibly unrealistic to me is that almost without exception, the boys last a very long time. I would expect some college men to cum quickly and then maybe again later, or 3 times. There are some that, realisticaly, seem to have trouble getting hard with a blow job (in front of 5-10 onlookers and while being videoed -- not sure I could!).
Here are some of my favorites:
-Bed Buddies. Charming and hot. A black girl films two white couples going at it.
-Birthday Wishes. Tiny girl fucks 2 guys alternately. The only video where the guys cum in short order. She orgasms about 36 min.
-Fooling Around. Nothing special in the first 63 min. Then a lovely slim tan brunette really gets into it and has several orgasms.
-Get a Head. A lot of real excitement, one orgasm around 45 min.
-Kiss Thiz. Nice foreplay and several orgasms.
-Pants Off Dance Off. One of the best orgy videos.
-Pleasure Pak. Gorgeous brown girl rides cowgirl a long time, has two orgasms around 33, 35 min.
-Pledge Fuck. One of the best with 3 couples fucking for a long time, enthusiastically. Brunette on bottom of bunk beds cums several times. 2 guys jizz at the end.
-Sleep Over. Girl-girl but sweet and hot, girls getting each other off.
-That's So. First half is a single couple with night vision. Tall slim brunette with real passion and trembling orgasms. Last half is forgettable.
-The Best Gift. Girlfriend invites her very hot roommate to trade off fucking her boyfriend. The roommate and the boy seem a bit shy about it which makes the whole thing more realistic and hotter.
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
* Unique concept.
* Main actress is young, slim, cute, natural.
* Download speeds excellent (several MB/sec when I tested it).
* Hi-res videos, files numbered uniquely.
* Most videos feature just one actress, Lola. Other actresses are not as impressive.
* No still photos.
* Videos short: 2-4 minutes each.
* Even after you find a video you like, it is hard to find it again. No search mechanism.
* Lack of creativity beyond the basic scenario -- repetitive.
* Music nice but tends to drown out moans and sighs.
Bottom Line:
Unique concept (as far as I know) and I thought it was worth the $20, despite the limited content. All solo, most with a large vibrator, most with panties (or more) on, dancing and cumming. I easily downloaded most of their videos in one evening. There are about 190 videos, no still pictures.
About 90% of the videos feature just one girl, Lola, who is also on other sites. She is cute, young, natural, slim and petite. The other girls in a few of the videos didn't turn me on (no obvious orgasms). Clearly the site would benefit from finding some other good-looking girls who can perform this scenario and cum, and from direction that allowed variation and creativity, such as removing some clothes during the video or adopting unusual positions.
Lola dances to nice (stripper type) music, usually with panties or pants on, often shiny spandex, always skin tight. Sometimes topless. In a couple of videos she takes her top off during the video. In one, she pulls her jeans down while she dancerbates, leaving them at half mast -- that was hot and they should expand on that theme. But for the most part, she removes no clothing during the entire video.
While dancing, Lola presses a large vibrator to her clit. After a minute or two, her expression changes from coy to involved in her own arousal, and then she has a nice orgasm. Sometimes the orgasm is long, and her legs quiver. Sometimes (especially when seen from her behind) she tightens her legs as she is cumming. Her orgasms are intense but not super intense. She often stops dancing as she starts to cum -- nice because it shows she's feeling good! She has a nice natural quality.
The early videos are more erotic than the later ones. In the early ones, she sometimes sits or lies down and concentrates on her orgasm. In the later ones, she stands while cumming -- sometimes it is intense but generally less than in the earlier ones.
Unfortunately it is hard to find a specific video. For example, video file 003 is on videoset (page key) 177, dated May 9th, 2011. There is no search mechanism.
There are a couple where she is nude, or has no panties on. In file 139 (page key 139) October 12, 2010, she is nude and wet in the shower. In file 153 (page key 153), December 8, 2010, she is nude and uses her hand instead of a vibrator. In file 174 (page key 174) March 26th, 2011, she wears only a cute tiny gold skirt with no panties underneath.
But my favorites are:
File 12, page key 186, June 10th, 2011. Collapses on the bed and writhes needily.
File 14, page key 188, June 16th, 2011: Lies on the bed and quivers.
File 42, page key 42, Sept. 30th, 2011: Collapses on the floor and cums needily.
Others I found very good:
File 8, (cant find it): wearing only gold boy shorts, lies on the bed and cums curling her toes.
File 25, page key 199, July 23rd 2011: Lies on a couch and cums hard.
File 56, page key 56, November 26th, 2011: Cums standing, breathing hard.
File 146, page key 146, November 10th, 2010: Cums standing and quivering.
Me And My GFs
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- The concept of this site is quite unusual and creative (see below), and the sex is more like a relationship than in the videos from most sites.
- Videos have decent resolution, 640 x 480, not overcompressed (but are not HD).
- Several updates/month.
- See my review of AllElitePass for more Pros.
- See my review of AllElitePass for more Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Videography is all point-of-view (POV), filmed by the single stunt cock. But that seems essential to the concept of this site (see below).
- Only 46 videos at this time, but growing. Site began November 2009.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
All videos at
are filmed by a single guy (100% POV). You never see the guy. Each video records a date with a girl, several videos per girl, and a series of girls. While I'm sure some or all of these dates are pre-scripted (or at least the sex is agreed to in advance), they do a credible job of making these seem like real dates. The girls resist being filmed a little and (one supposes) would refuse if a 3rd party were filming.
There are 4-6 videos for each girl. Often the first is just a date with a getting-to-know each other conversation. This sometimes ends in the girl stripping but no sex. Second date is often a blow job, sometimes in a public park. There is sometimes a fuck scene ending in a creampie, and usually a fuck scene ending in a facial. The fuck scenes occur in his apartment. There is sometimes a shower video with the girl closing the bathroom door. He sets up a hidden camera to record her dressing when she comes out, supposedly without her knowing. In some shower scenes, he is allowed to film the girl in the shower.
Condoms are never used. The guy is a bad lover and a chauvinist. He gets BJs and sex, but never once does he do oral on the girl (OK, very briefly in Misty's first scene). Not even any serious finger-fucking, or vibrators. He seems completely oblivious to whether the girl gets off or not. The girls seem to enjoy the sex but there are few obvious orgasms. The girls seem genuinely fresh and horny, not like plastic porn pros.
The guy lasts longer than I expect is typical of real sex, but not nearly as long as most stunt cocks. This is a big plus in my book.
Aside from the creative concept, what sets this site apart and, in my opinion, above most sites, are the following. The guy is constantly complementing the girl on her beauty and sexiness. There is a bit of seduction going on. He expresses his sexual enjoyment constantly, and appreciation during and after (while the girls are less expressive -- at least there are no fake moans). The guy is polite, gentle, respectful and kind to the girls (if not a good lover). He has a normal-sized dick. Both parties actually seem to enjoy the sex, have fun, and there is laughing and some chemistry. When the girl looks at the camera, she is enjoying the sex, not posing.
He sometimes comes in the girl's mouth during a BJ, and the reaction of the girl runs from spitting, shock and running to the bathroom, to unsurprised swallowing.
My recommendations:
Misty, scene 3, was my favorite (scene 5 also good).
Good: Angelina (most scenes), Elli (her frown after he comes in her mouth in scene 4 is priceless), Kara (scenes 3 & 5).
Don't miss the surprise ending in Leigh's scene 6!
Young Libertines
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- Occasional videos with real sexual excitement and orgasms.
- Beautiful young bodies (both men and women).
- Occasionally what might be real couples with real chemistry in homemade videos.
- No super closeups! Few closeups at all. You get to enjoy the beautiful writhing bodies!
- The stunt cocks are generally nice, gentle and non-abusive (if boring).
- I asked several questions via a support form, and got prompt and helpful answers.
- Photos can be viewed online, downloaded individually or in zipped sets.
- Most videos are mechanical, there is no chemistry, so they are un-erotic. Perpetual optimist that I am, I was hoping for better at this site!
- Video quality varies widely. Some shot by a cameraperson (those are best). Some homemade with fixed camera. Some POV (usually too jerky). Some low-res, most OK resolution.
- Way too many videos end with the guy jerking off in girls face. I hate that.
- About five guys are the stunt cocks in many of the videos. None have any personality. They bang hard with no imagination. Its up the girl to make something good in these. Most fail.
- When you download a video, the default filename is a useless fulllength-high.wmv, or fulllength-low.wmv. Its up to you to rename every one.
- Several ads for other sites interspersed on every page! Annoying!
- Static images (1500 px) modest quality (inferior cameras?), poor lighting (flash), and red-eye not removed. Models teeth often yellow. Generally unexciting.
Bottom Line:
Overall, I was disappointed with this site (as with nearly all), but it was not a total loss, as I was able to find 20-some videos that I really liked to add to my collection. However, as seems nearly universally the case, the truly erotic videos seem to be accidents that happened in spite of bad direction and lack of imagination.
WMV is the only video format offered. High quality is 640 x 480 but quality varies. There is also a low bitrate video download option, which I never used.
Video download speed was so so, taking about 20-some minutes for the typical 400 megabyte file. However, after I got the first few, I could keep occupied watching them while downloading more, so I didnt have to wait. I was able to downloade up to 6 or 8 concurrently with no problem (other than reduced speed per file, of course).
They list a large number of bonus sites and feeds listed as coming up, but no bonus sites actually available. Some bonus feed sites are available e.g., not downloadable. I took a look at a couple and they seem really boring.
Very few of the videos have anal penetration. That is a pro for me and a con for some. Many use condoms openly. That is a plus for me. Most of the girls were shaved, but some were just trimmed I like the mix. A few of the videos end in creampies, and refreshingly, they dont belabor the dripping pussy.
There are about 150 videos available. Navigation is by date added, or you can search for the name of the video. Descriptions of the videos are ridiculous and useless, and seem to have no connection to the content (same for the titles). There is a 5-star rating system, which seemed somewhat useful. Generally, I found the 2-star videos to be boring, while some of the 3-star videos were good.
I downloaded and watched about 80 videos. I deleted 40-some immediately as I would never want to watch them again, simply because the sex was mechanical, no chemistry, no excitement. I kept about 25 that had some excitement, chemistry, intimacy, fun, laughing, and most of all, female orgasms. I much prefer when the guy comes from real excitement right out of the box over the girls tits or butt. If your tastes are similar to mine, you can save time by starting with these (search for the titles). Remember, the titles bear no relation to the contents. These are in 3 groups, best first, alphabetical within each group. Sorry I cant put them in a column because of PUs annoying 40-line restriction here.
Silly chick is in a movie now (my favorite).
Depraved couple; Fyl018; Marki peeping on Silvia; Real homemade video; Red-haired goddess; Silly Cathy; Summer day suck and fuck; W041; W108.
Excited Joyce; F061; H005; Lucky guy and two girls; So nice ass; Too-young-to-have-sex; W047; W111; While her parents are home.
Dont pull my hair you goon; Every day work on sex skills; F032; Sexy tattooed girl; Shy Marta; W093.
Dare Ring
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
01:27pm (
Update History
Reason: Completed the review.
Uniquely creative with many things that I love. See my profile for why, and the forum "Against the grain".
As stated in previous reviews, each of the 12 games has seven rounds/scenes. There are typically 5-6 players, sometimes all girls, sometimes girls with a couple of guys. First round is spin the bottle and answer questions about their sex lives. I liked the one I watched but I watched only one. The last round involves players having the chance to choose one or more other players to "satisfy" them with oral sex. Typically the next to last round involves semi-random giving of oral sex ltd to 30 sec per turn, but no orgasms.
Everything is consensual. Everything is kind. Nobody is hurt. There is sometimes real chemistry. Sometimes there is sex and it is fun. These are real girls, not models, with a range of average builds. Maybe they have chosen their partners in advance, but maybe not -- there appears to be some sexual tension because of the ...
- Apparently there will never be any updates.
- Very limited amount of content.
- Mediocre videography.
- Fake male orgasms.
Bottom Line:
... uncertainty of what will happen next. The guys are disappointing -- few of them manage to come, and some fake it! When there is good sex, the non-participants sitting in the background looking awed are a turn-on. Editing seems minimal, making for charming realism. I watched all 12 of the round 7's, and some of the round 6's. I watched all only 1 game in its entirity (Game 1, figuring that the quality would deteriorate in later games, which in general it did!). The intermediate rounds mostly involve disrobing, kissing, sucking nipples, and such -- fun to watch once. My personal opinions:
Best round 7: Game 5: 5 out of 6 players get off for real. Round 6 of Game 5 is a hot teaser.
Other good round 7's:
Game 6: Strap on orgy. Only two give and two receive, but the others watch in awe. Both receivers come quickly and more than once. Hot!
Game 8: 5-girl orgy. Several of the girls come several times. Very hot.
Game 10: Several girls come. Round 6 is hot too.
Games 2 and 4, round 7, each starts out OK with 2 or 3 girls getting off with oral roulette (game 2, 30 seconds rounds of oral by different players) or untimed oral by one player (game 4), but end lamely with lots of oral on a guy who never gets off, or fakes it.
Unexciting round 7's:
Games 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 12.
There are also some short "bonus games". BJ roulette is sort of fun. The best scene is "Topless pie eating, camera 1" which ends with the only actual fuck on the site. After a long BJ with pie cream smeared around, he gives her oral and then fucks her for only about 4 minutes (realistic!). The other players leave the room, apparently to give them privacy. She doesn't appear to come, but seems into it; he does, and uses a condom without hiding the fact. Its a very sweet amateur scene with lots of kissing, hugging, and tenderness. I found it very hot!
Although this site has not been updated for over two years, it is so unique that I found it worthwhile. I joined for $20 then canceled a day or two later, after I had downloaded the scenes I wanted. CAREFUL, it used CCBill which says billing will recur after 30 days unless you cancel.
It is really too bad that this idea wasn't developed further, or even simply continued for more games. It was a great start. I hope someone else will pick up this idea and develop it!
1000 Orgasms
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
See my review of AllElitePass for Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
This is another Sybian site. A girl mounts the Sybian and we get to watch. Some girls come with a partner, and then the partner (often but not always a guy) gets to control the Sybian.
The girls are not overdirected, so there is sometimes spontaneity and their personalities can come out.
My recommendations:
1000 Orgasms
(Sybian site): Ruby and Roxanna are truly amazing! Roxanna nearly falls off in orgasmic convulsions. Her video alone almost makes joining worthwhile. Vanessa (in the last third of her video) gets it on nicely. Honorable mention: Alex, Savana, Sophie, Veronica.
All Elite Pass
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- I paid only $9.95 for a month -- a bargain!
- Access to 97 sites.
- There are occasional gems (see sites listed below).
- They have a search (but see cons).
- You can browse models by name.
- Once I started a video download, it went reliably and the download time was consistently OK.
- Beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after joining if you don't uncheck them!
- Some PU members have had bad experiences with billing (see Comments here). I had minimal problems: see my details below.
- Cancellation is not straightforward, but works if you are persistent (details below).
- Most of the content is standard fare, e.g. boring and non-erotic.
- Often I got no response from their sites for several minutes. I would open 6 or so tabs and wait. Eventually, all would load. This happened repeatedly but was not a big problem because I could spend the waiting time evaluating a previously downloaded video.
- Most of the sites have not been updated since 2008.
- Their search covers all their sites, so is not useful for searching a single site.
- Video titles and descriptions are useless.
- Still photos are generally unexciting.
Bottom Line:
I became a member of AllElitePass by joining
for one month (see my review at
). I was very very careful to uncheck the pre-checked cross sells for two sites (AllNetworkPass and
). Had I not unchecked these, I would have been billed $80 one day after joining, according to some very fine print. I also kept a snapshot of the unchecked membership form as evidence, before clicking submit, just in case they billed me anyway -- given their bad reputation.
Although some PU members report problems with AllElitePass (see Comments there), I had no problems. I joined with a PayPal SecureCard (a temporary credit card limited to one vendor) and
canceled the card a few days after joining, after the transaction was completed. Although this would not have prevented them from billing me more than they promised in the first few days, it would prevent rebilling after one month, and fraudlent billing by any other vendors.
Cancelling was not straightforward and I complained about this, and received a reply acknowledging receipt of my concerns. When you
click "Support" you are asked to choose the company that billed you. None of those listed were the company that showed up on my credit
card. There was a link for live support chat. In frustration, I clicked that, and THERE finally was a link to cancel. It required that I enter two of three items (no problem), promptly found my account, and I canceled. I received an email confirmation of my cancellation (watch your spam box!) from
(not the company that billed me).
I have described my tastes in my profile. I downloaded and watched videos from about half of the 97 sites offered. Below I have listed the sites where I found, to my pleasant surprise, a few videos that I enjoyed and felt were worth keeping (titles are given under the review of each site). See each site below for details. "++" means there is something surprisingly good at the site (see its review).
.com ++
.com (what you'd expect, not worth reviewing, but Capri gets honorable mention).
.com (what you'd expect, not worth reviewing, but Dena Cally is multi-orgasmic, skinny, and a joy to behold. Honorable mention: LilBaby. On the bad side, there are many fake male cumshots at this site.
.com (what you'd expect, I didn't review it separately. Eva, Jassie, and Sativa are good.)
.com ++
.com ++
.com ++
College Fuck Fest
Current Member
over 1 month
(at the time of review).
Unlike most of the AllElitePass sites, this one is being updated regularly, once or twice a month.
- A Bargain: My one month subscription cost only $9.95, and had full bonus access to the 90-some other sites at allelitepass.
- Seeing the amazed faces of real college students watching a couple (of porn actors) have sex in the same room is fun.
- Occasional videos with chemistry, arousal, attractive young couples and female orgasms.
- There are about 100 videos (most low to very low resolution).
See my review of AllElitePass for more Pros.
You are joining
. Some PU members have been billed inappropriately by this company, but I had no problems. See my review of AllElitePass for more Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Most of the content is older and very low resolution.
- At one point in time, the resolution gets much better, but it is worse
again in later videos.
- Most of the sex scenes have no chemistry, no fun, no arousal, no female orgasms, and end with the guy jacking off in the girl's face (which I find counter-erotic and dumb).
- The titles and descriptions tell you nothing useful.
- All videos download with the same generic filename so you must rename every download.
- Party numbers are mostly not listed on the site, just titles and dates.
- Still photos are generally unexciting.
Bottom Line:
I had subscribed to
(CFF) in March, 2009, and enjoyed some of the videos, so I re-subscribed in May, 2010 to see the updates. It was worthwhile this time because of the allelitepass bonus sites, but I probably won't do this again. Although CFF has real updates about twice a month, many of the bonus sites had very limited content (a dozen or two videos per site) and had no updates since 2008. However, I had not explored these thoroughly in 2009, and this time I did, discovering some unexpected gems (see AllElitePass for those).
About half of each video shows a noisy college party, with some hot and some not so hot college girls dancing to loud music, and rarely some boob flashes. The other half shows a couple having sex.
They pretend this is a couple of students attending the party, but the pretense is quite thin. The couple is often older than college
age, sometimes with lots of tattoos and piercings, and these are clearly porn pros. Often some or all of the sex is on a couch in a room full of beer-drinking college students watching the fun. Seeing their amazed faces is fun. I don't think they ever show ordinary college students at the party having sex, or at most they pan quickly past a couple making out, mostly clothed, in a dark corner. Sometimes the couple having sex is in a bedroom or bathroom, but usually with several guys watching, sometimes a girl or two also. In one of the early videos, you can see large signs posted here and there warning that the party is being videoed, and that if you don't want to be seen on an adult website, you should leave.
Most of these sex scenes are pretty standard stuff with no chemistry, no fun, no laughing, no arousal, and the women don't orgasm. These typically end with the guy jacking off in a facial, which I find counter-erotic and dumb. There are a few exceptions, which are what might make the site worth a one-month subscription (if your taste agrees with mine; see my profile). Also, there are a few gems among the bonus sites (see AllElitePass for details).
CFF#91 New Years' Group Sex Party (April 2009): 3 couples go at it in the same room. One woman with very short hair orgasms hard over and over. Lo-res.
CFF#89 New Years' Party 2009 (March 2009): Two couples go at it in the same room. One of the women orgasms hard many times. Lo-res.
CFF#45 Valley Frat Fucks Part 2 (October 2008): Skinny attractive brunette (I've seen her on many other sites) fucks a nice looking guy. She orgasms to oral. A hot blonde watches and touches a bit. Decent resolution (700 x 400).
CFF#26 Jello Party (June 2008): The jello wrestling is fun. At the end, a pretty blonde with some personality but fake boobs gets into
the sex and has a couple of nice orgasms. Lo-res.
CFF#25 Holly Weird (May 2008): A young attractive couple, seemingly new to the business and so with a little personality and arousal going for them, enjoys sex in a garage. Lo-res.
Out of room here. Continued in a "Reply".
Sleep Sins
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
Not many pros, except for the unusual concept (see below).
See my review of AllElitePass for Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Only 12 videos total, all but one dated November 2008.
- No updates since March 2009.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
This site has a cool premise. The girl finds the guy "sleeping" and has her way with him, giving him a BJ at the end (so he can't jack himself off!). What a pleasant contrast to the usual overbearing stunt cocks, often ignoring the girl's responses and banging her hard when she doesn't want that, and pressing anal on her. (No anal here!)
Eden Adams is just fantastic here. I looked her up and she's a major porn star with tons of the usual kinds of hardcore scenes (none of which I've seen because this is her only scene on AllElitePass), but she really shines here! She orgasms over and over, clearly enjoying herself.
Chrissy, Faye Valentine, and Nautica Thorne are also good here.
Teen Brazil
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
See my review of AllElitePass for Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
Only 33 videos, with no updates since October 2008.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
has anal sex in most scenes, and the sex tends to be rough. Most of the scenes have no chemistry, no arousal, no laughing or fun, just rough sex.
There were a handful of videos that I liked:
Pilar is a gorgeous, skinny, petite, dark-skinned lovely who seems to enjoy getting fucked, and fucking back. Bianca gets it on convincingly. Honorable mention: Debby, Mima.
The Habib Show
Was a member approx.
1 month
prior to this review.
- Unique content with real pay for play street/bar girls, no faking, no acting.
- Fun party atmosphere. Some street scenes during pickups.
- Wide range of female body types, some young and gorgeous.
- All videos are downloadable.
- Videos can be sorted by most popular or latest.
- I reported a bad download link and they replied within 24 hours saying they fixed it (I didn't verify that).
- Horrible, very jerky, amateurish camera work is hard to watch and often misses the best parts.
- Large annoying watermark often blocks what you most want to see!
- Video resolution varies from poor to excellent.
- Video format seems to depend randomly on which camera they used. Each video is available in only one format: wmv, mp4, divx.
- Bulk of each video is conversation, undressing, showering. Sex is typically just a few minutes.
- Guys make little or no effort to pleasure the girls.
- Trailers are mixed in with full length videos.
- Stills are lo-res screenshots from the videos with no artistry whatsoever.
- Occasionally they use fake semen ("big willie").
- Download speed was sometimes very good but sometimes very poor -- varies widely.
- Downloaded video files have unique names but those names are often hard to relate to the title of the video -- so you may not be able to find it again.
- Bonus sites are very poor.
Bottom Line:
I was disappointed with these videos. I joined for one month and will never re-join.
They are mildly interesting documentary but just not very erotic. It is sort of fun to see these guys pick up pay for play street/bar girls in various countries and what the girls say when they get back in the hotel room. Basically Habib just videos hotel rooms where he brings pay for play girls, and most of the videos are her arriving, undressing, horsing around, maybe some smoking, showering, just a few minutes of sex. A rare few of these girls managed to get off and enjoy themselves, but not because the guys made much effort. I don't like it when the guys bang away forever -- I prefer that they show some excitement and enjoyment and shoot their load in a natural amount of time -- but these guys mostly have no stamina at all -- no real attention to arousing the woman, then a couple of minutes in and out and they are done. The men often have trouble even getting hard. Too much booze and too little sleep? Nothing exciting about that either.
Condoms are used in nearly all of these videos. Under the circumstances of what they are doing, I applaud that. However it doesn't increase the erotic value of the videos.
Due to very amateurish videography with really no effort being made to produce a watchable video, the video quality is horrible. Lighting is often poor.
There are no cancellation links on the site so keep your subscription email info! Canceling was straightforward by going directly to the billing site.
I downloaded and watched 47 videos. There are probably over 100 full length videos on the site but it is hard to estimate. Only about 10 seemed worth keeping to watch again someday, and only about 5 of those were somewhat erotic and had orgasms (a couple from rubbing their own clits while being fucked).
Bikini Banger
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
See my review of AllElitePass for Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
Only 41 videos, all released in October, 2008. No updates since.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
BikiniBanger: A guy finds a girl e.g. on the beach, and talks her into "auditioning". He fucks her always in the same room, and usually the same guy. Most of these are boring and un-erotic, no chemistry, no female orgasms.
However, Abell is a skinny young thing who seems to genuinely enjoy getting a good pounding, and probably orgasms at least once. Honorable mention: Cherry.
Schoolgirl Creampies
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
Not many Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Only 12 videos total! All but one are dated 11/12/08.
- No updates since March, 2009.
- Video resolution is poor to barely OK.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
This site offers a mixed bag of only 12 videos all ending in creampies (which I much prefer over facials).
Brandy, Cheyenne, and Chrissy are all responsive and erotic here. Riley gets honorable mention.
Girls Out West
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- Uniquely natural / real models (average women).
- Natural settings without glossy editing.
- Genuine amateurs (not even pro-am!)
- Little or no chemistry or sexual excitement in most videos.
- Most videos are older, and have very poor resolution.
- Often (not always) very jerky camera work. Makes me seasick!
- Many videos have low contrast, no real blacks, so are like watching through a steamy window.
Bottom Line:
I was intrigued by the Annie's truly unique approach and values, as I understood them from the reviews here and from looking at the site as a non-member. I definitely appreciate porn done by women with real female arousal -- at least I think I do (need more cases now). I watched the 4 trailers for boy/girl videos, and they seemed promising. The site says 500 videos -- so I figured there must be at least 100 b/g videos. So I joined hoping for some b/g videos with real arousal, female orgasms, and other things that I like (see my profile, and the forum "Against the grain").
Unfortunately, I have to agree with PU reviewer ramscrota. As a whole, the b/g videos offered by this site are pathetic.
First, quantity and resolution. Only 24 are listed, 2 of which are mis-indexed (they have no boys). Half of these, 13, are available only in very low resolution, highly compressed blurry 480 x 360 pixels mpg. Later vids move up to 640 x 360 wmv, then more recentlhy 770 x 435 mp4 or wmv without the blurring compression.
Worst of all, in most of the b/g videos, the couple seems to be working for the camera woman, trying hard (sometimes difficulty with erection) without being very horny or aroused. Sometimes they are clearly too hot, sweaty, and uncomfortable, and in some outdoor scenes the flies are quite distracting/disgusting.
So, after looking at all of the b/g scenes and finding very little, I looked at some of the g/g or solo videos. Since I find genuine arousal exciting, I looked mostly at the ones where the description indicated an orgasm. Again, most of these were simply unexciting. Natural down to earth people, just not very expressive or excited people.
As others have said, the models are a cross section of body types, ages, and personalities -- but all presented in very natural form, little or no makeup. I like that approach, but not the results here. Also one of the two camera women is often crossing the viewport, or her shadow, which I found realistic but somewhat distracting.
Overall, I have to say that for me, joining this site was a waste of money.
All that said, I did find a few vids that I downloaded and didn't erase after one viewing. Larissa's Manhunt is hilarious and she is really entertaining and sexy. Unfortunately, the 4 segments end without any sex or orgasms. (I deleted those.) The following b/g videos had some real sexual energy, excitement, and orgasms:
- Jasmine & Lee, Caravan Sex
- Timbo fucks Kim (silly overacting, but real multiple orgasms)
- Samantha and Maxwell was a really tender, affectionate, and hot video.
- Vince and Miah were fun.
After watching a couple of dozen solo and g/g videos (generally not my thing) the only one I am keeping is
- Daisy Duke & Alma (real horny excitement and energy and orgasms)
All of the above except Timbo were available in reasonable resolution.
Honorable mention goes to Kim's motorcycle video (3 parts). No orgasms but an amazing concept, pretty well done.
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
Creative scenarios, very unusual.
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.
Mostly natural breasts.
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.
Guys don't walk on already hard.
Normal sized dicks.
No brainless rough hard banging away.
No fake moaning.
Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.
Too many long closeups.
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn't fade out -- but it doesn't matter because nobody ever really gets aroused.
Bottom Line:
A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I've subscribed.
The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.
The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.
In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.
The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl's mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.
A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.
For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the "updates". Most of the videos have poor resolution.
The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.
It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don't find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.
Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!
Penetration Tease
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
Not many.
See my review of AllElitePass for some Pros.
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Only 14 videos, all dated 11/12/08.
- No updates since 2008.
- Video resolution is awful.
Bottom Line:
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined
and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
Personally, I am a big fan of non-abusive penetration teasing with the girl in control. Most of the females in these videos don't do a very good job of it, tho.
But Marie is fantastic! (I wish I could get this video in decent resolution!) Desire and Lynn are quite good also. Honorable mention to Adrianna, Heather, and Lavenea.
Casual Teen Sex
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- The girls are young and really beautiful.
- Most videos start with a pick-up scene, on the street, a bridge, a party, a mall, etc. These are badly acted but the scenery is interesting, it is nice to see the girl in clothes, and these are the most creative part of this site.
- Quite a few different men.
- Lighting in videos is uniformly good.
- The location is not always the same.
- Only 50-some videos.
- The price is way too high for the small number of videos and their bad quality.
- Girls rarely get aroused, and are very quiet when they do have orgasms.
- The camerawork is unbelievably bad, extremely jerky nearly all the time, like the camera-person has Parkinson's? Just horrible, consistently so.
- Jackhammer mechanical sex.
- Some fake ejaculations.
- No names given for actors/actresses, so you can't search for their other videos.
- There is often a lot of distracting traffic noise outside the apartment, and/or amazingly squeaky beds.
- Still photos poor. Even when the actress was gorgeous, I usually couldn't find stills that I wanted to keep.
- Poor support. I emailed a question before subscribing and received no answer.
Bottom Line:
- All videos are boy-girl (some threesomes).
- Most girls have smallish breasts (yay!), but a few have large gorgeous natural ones. Implants are rare (yay!).
- No anal (yay!).
- Few if any facials (yay!). Ejaculation on the belly and tits, or a few creampies. Often the guys jack themselves off for way too long (boo).
- Condoms rare (boo!).
- The guys are young and slim and good looking but don't seem to know how to do anything except jackhammer with a deadpan face (sound familiar?).
- Very few closeups. I would have liked some brief closeups of the girls' faces.
I was quite disappointed with this site. The couples have a mindset that they're being paid to fuck, and fuck they do, but very few of the girls or guys take any erotic pleasure in it. The girls seem really inhibited about showing any enjoyment, and they seem embarassed to show any pleasure during cunnilingus (which is sometimes skipped and often brief). Nobody seems to be having fun.
This site is done by the same group as
. (See my review of that site for some technical points that I won't repeat here.) The website design is identical, but the content is worse. I was able to find about 20 videos at
that were worth keeping (out of 80 that I watched, so 25%), while here, I found only a few, but barely worth keeping (~5% -- I watched all 50). Overall, I felt that I wasted my time and money.
In my opinion (see my profile for my tastes), the best are Spontaneous Sex, Girl At The Student Party, Splashes of Champagne and cum, Welcome Fuck.
The Sandfly
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
- Occasional videos of real amateurs, really aroused.
- Amusing random clips (but these are rare): clit piercing, wild parties, girl pissing on beach fire, sex on a trampoline, etc.
- Low price: $20 for 4 months.
- Not much good content -- fair number of clips but most very short and horrible quality.
- Mostly very short videos. Most of the minority that show any excitement end before anyone has a climax.
- Mostly horrible resolution, like an old cell phone video. ALL uniformly small format (about 360 x 400 pixels), and no "full screen" display option.
- Often very amateurish jerky camera work, usually POV.
- Often very poor light -- some so dark you can't see anything.
- The majority of amateur videos are just blowjobs. Next most common is solo girl masturbation but often not to climax. Next is just girls undressing or prancing around, often not even nude. There are a small number of boy-girl fucking scenes.
- Some members have uploaded commercial porn clip that you may well have seen on free sites.
- The video player has no time scale.
- Streaming only, no downloads. You cannot right-click and download the video.
- No search mechanism. No organization for videos.
Bottom Line:
The guy who apparently runs this site, "SandFly", takes spy voyeur videos of girls and couples on the beach. Most of these are just women with bare breasts, sometimes nude, sunbathing. Low resolution, jerky, telephoto from a long way away. There are only a handful showing man-woman couples or groups having sex, and most of those end before anything much happens. Actually, you'll find better voyeur spy vids of amateurs on xhamster. There are roughly 110 of these videos.
The other side of this site is user-uploaded videos. You can earn access to the site by uploading videos so a lot of boring or duplicate stuff is uploaded.
There are about 120 "big clips" (a few minutes long instead of less than a minute). And there are more than 1,000 short clips uploaded by users. Both categories suffer from the "cons" listed above. And there are quite a few duplicates within these counts.
There are also still picture sets but I didn't bother to look at them.
Bottom line: for such a cheap price one can hardly complain or expect more, but not worth the time I spent looking thru the videos.
Class 3Some
Current Member
less than 1 month
(at the time of review).
The men are younger than in oldje (but not young).
Two or more girls per scene (if you like that -- I don't because it makes real arousal of the women even less likely).
Sometimes the cameraman roams over the women's bodies in a pleasing way.
Normal sized dicks.
Some creativity in scenarios.
No fun, chemistry, arousal, and very rarely any female orgasms.
Long boring passionless sex (but at least it isn't rushed).
Only about 20 videos total at this site!
Way overpriced for what it offers.
Video resolution is poor.
The girls rarely if ever touch each other or their own clits.
Bottom Line:
This is a bonus site for oldje. See my review of oldje -- for my tastes, it is a loser. Class-3some is even worse. It suffers from all the same limitations.
Private Society
Excellent and unusual site
I joined PrivateSociety for a month in November, 2014. No problem with billing, canceling, or downloading. I thought it was creative and excellent. A group of male buddies cruise around midwestern and western towns and find women willing to be in videos for pay. Some are waitresses, some are wives mad at their husbands, etc. Videos are made in motel rooms. The women are very "real", down to earth, and often this is their first porn video. Some young, some middle aged, some older, all sizes. Amateurs with an occasional hooker. Usually the males fucking the women are the guys who set it up and operate the cameras, but sometimes it is a boyfriend of the woman. I like that they usually start with their clothes on and there is some foreplay. Above all I like that they have fun! And they don't enforce a standard script -- they are spontaneous -- except that they do often end in a facial (not my thing). I downloaded 78 clips, among which I found 8 clips that I thought were very hot (women getting turned on and having orgasms), and 15 more that I thought were hot. That is a high percentage for me as I am quite picky. I love the "waitress in the diner" or "woman next door" feel of these videos.
Mom XXX.com
Great value through BigZ.Com
I joined BigZ.Com for a month in January, 2015. I downloaded videos from
, Girlfriends,
, and MomXXX. No problems with billing, canceling, or downloading. For me, the surprise was MomXXX, where I found 9 clips that I thought were very hot (see my profile for a description of my taste), and I'm quite picky. Those were 1043, 1109, 1113, 1125, 1129, 1175, 1241, 1277, and 1318. MomXXX has considerable overlap in actors with
, which is fine since I like
very well also. Uma is a gorgeous and amazing multi-orgasmic woman featured in both sites. I also found a few at
that I thought were hot to very hot. Nothing of interest at the other sites.
Shown :
Page :
Next Page
Contact Us
Terms & Rules
Porn Review
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of
, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check
this site
To report
child pornography
, go directly to
! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about
porn addiction
? We recommend this
helpful resource
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 1.32 seconds.


text:
Desert Peaks Section (DPS Peaks List) > Mount Tipton > Climber's Log
Mount Tipton Climber's Log
[ Sign the Climber's Log ]
|West Ridge
Date Climbed: Jan 17, 2015
|A little brushy, but not too bad. Nice temperature and no snow. Overall, a pretty forgetable climb.
|Posted Jan 20, 2015 5:36 pm
|Slight variation
Date Climbed: May 3, 2013
|Eva ,Steve and I took a more direct approach which had its brushy places but once on the ridge had some very nice climbing.
|Posted May 4, 2013 12:00 pm
Date Climbed: Apr 7, 2013
|We went up the wash to the saddle, but over shot it somehow and ended up on the bushwack ridge from hell. We eventually made the main ridge line and it was easy going after that. Steep, but free of brush. I saw Eric Tipton's entry in the register, and several other of the usual suspects there. Great fun. We went down the "right" way and only hit brush between the wash and the old road. (Party of three from LVMC). We had climbed Perkins earlier in the day.
|Posted Apr 8, 2013 12:16 pm
|Plenty of snow
Date Climbed: Feb 17, 2012
|Some of the roughest brush I've ever done.Got away from the standard route which was a big mistake.
Plenty of snow on the last 600 ft.
|Posted Feb 19, 2012 12:01 pm
|North Ridge
Date Climbed: Apr 16, 2011
|Ended up on the ridge to the north of the peak rather than the standard DPS approach. This made for a longer and more tedious day than was probably necessary. (Descended via the gully below this ridge- which was also long and tedious)
Pics and commentary are here.
|Posted Apr 18, 2011 10:29 pm
|Brushy, warm and breezy climb
Date Climbed: Apr 2, 2011
|Climbed with Adam Helman following standard route. Warm but breezy weather, and very brushy. Not difficult, but slow-going with the crud underneath (probably better in the dead of winter). Great summit, great views! Snake count: 1.
|Posted Apr 4, 2011 2:08 pm
|Bob Burd
|West Ridge
Date Climbed: Nov 30, 2009
|Easier than expected, not so brushy as advertised. Hazy views that day though. Trip Report
|Posted Jan 3, 2010 6:54 pm
|Mount Tipton
Date Climbed: Jun 27, 2009
|I've always wanted to try one of these in the dead of summer. Carried over a gallon of water and needed most of it! The route is pretty straight-forward and the brush is not bad by AZ standards. The views were ridiculously good the whole day. Loved the pine forest on top - great day.
|Posted Jun 29, 2009 12:07 am
|Top of Tip
Date Climbed: Feb 1, 2003
|Up standard DPS route. Memorable day for Columbia disaster,
which darkened completion of AZ 2K project.
Lots of DPSers get up this peak.
|Posted Aug 5, 2008 12:51 am
|Nicer than expected
Date Climbed: Nov 5, 2006
|Took the normal DPS route. Brush wasn't that bad (by Adirondack standards), much better than on Kingston. The pictures here so far don't do the mountain justice -- very pleasant, and the views to S and W are quite nice.
Last 1.5 miles of "2WD" road have deteriorated quite a bit since the last DPS guide.
|Posted Nov 6, 2006 4:35 am
|Route Climbed: west ridge Date Climbed: Dec05
|Nice granite crags and tall pines near the summit. Despite the cross-country sloggy approach, only 4 1/2 hours car-to-car.
Did Fortification Hill that afternoon.
|Posted Dec 29, 2005 11:35 am
|Eric Tipton
|Route Climbed: West Ridge Date Climbed: April 2003
|Namesake peak I had to do this one. I climbed this peak with my lifetime partner Elaine, She doesn't usually do this sort of thing but with alot of coersion and outright lies about how easy the trail would be I convinced her she would have the time of her life doing this peak. After several hours of slogging our way thru cholla and brush, up steep trailess slopes, minor route deviations, and the constant threat of seeing a snake we made the summit of Mount Tipton. I apologized about the hike being a bit harder than I had let on ,and she replied " Its always hard when you mount the Tipton" Great trip, Eric Tipton.
|Posted Oct 25, 2005 2:50 am
|Mount Tipton
Date Climbed: May 18, 2005
|A large and impressive desert peak.
|Posted May 26, 2005 8:50 pm

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Order Status
View Cart
Kitchen Accessories
Appliance Decorator Panels
Backsplash Accessories
Bakers Racks
Bar Stools
Butcher Block
Countertop Brackets
Cutting Boards & Chop Blocks
Decorative Cabinet Hardware
Door Hardware
Floor Mats, Anti-Fatigue
Kitchen Faucets
Kitchen Islands & Carts
Kitchen Sinks
Pot Racks
Range Hoods
Sideboards & Hutches
Sliding Door Hardware
Stainless Steel Shelves
Stainless Steel Worktables
Supports & Brackets
Tables & Chairs
Table Bases & Table Tops
Trash Cans & Recycling
Unfinished Furniture
Wine Racks & Accessories
Cabinet Accessories
Appliance Garages
Appliance Lifts
Backsplash Accessories
Base Cabinet Organizers
Built In Ironing Centers
Corner Cabinet Systems
Cabinet Lighting
Closet Organization
Corbels & Moldings
Countertop Supports
Custom Drawers
Decoractive Cabinet Hardware
Door Hardware
Drawer Organizers
Drawer Slides
Laundry & Ironing Centers
Lazy Susans
Pantry Organizers
Spice Racks
Step Stools
Sliding Door Hardware
Table Legs & Supports
Towel Racks
Trash Cans - Built In
TV Mounts & Swivels
Under Cabinet Pull Downs
Upper Wall Cabinet Organizers
Wine & Stemware Racks
Bathroom Accessories
Bathroom Accessories
Bathroom Benches
Bathroom Fans
Bathroom Faucets
Bathroom Mirrors
Bathroom Safety
Bathroom Sinks
Bathroom Storage
Heated Floors
Medicine Cabinets
Shower Seats
Trash & Sanitary Receptacles
Wall Fixtures
Home Accessories
Accent Furniture
Bakers Racks
Bedroom Furniture
Cabinets for your Home
Closet Organization
Dining Room Furniture
Door Hardware
Entertainment Centers
Fireplaces & Tools
Floor Mats, Anti-Fatigue
Garage Organization
Ironing Boards & Centers
Laundry Care
Living Room Furniture
Office Furniture
Outdoor Furniture
Shelving & Bookcases
Sideboards & Hutches
Sliding Door Hardware
Unfinished Furniture
Kitchen Accessories
Kitchen Sinks
Kitchen Sinks
With a huge selection of kitchen sinks, KitchenSource.com makes choosing the perfect sink simple. Available in stainless steel, copper, fireclay and many other finishes, our kitchen sinks are sure to blend perfectly with your existing kitchen, or into your remodel plans. From single-bowl sinks to integrated commercial kitchen sinks, manufacturers like Whitehaus, John Boos, Empire, Houzer, Nantucket Sinks & more, offer only the finest in quality and selection. We also offer a wide variety of faucets to match your new kitchen sink. An expert sales team is standing by to assist with your purchase. Please don't hesitate to contact us with questions.
Undermount Sinks >
Drop-In Sinks >
Bar/ Entertainment Sinks >
Utility Sinks >
Front Apron Sinks >
Kitchen Sink Sets >
Garbage Disposals >
Sink Accessories >
Kraus Kitchen Sinks >
JULIEN Kitchen Sinks >
Whitehaus Kitchen Sinks >
Houzer Kitchen Sinks >
Franke Kitchen Sinks >
Wells Sinkware >
Noah by Whitehaus >
Dawn Kitchen Sinks >
Nantucket Kitchen Sinks >
InSinkErator >
Vigo Kitchen Sinks >
Empire Kitchen Sinks >
Cantrio Koncepts Kitchen Sinks >
Karran Kitchen Sinks >
Advance Tabco Kitchen Sinks >
Aero Kitchen Sinks >
John Boos Kitchen Sinks >
Kitchen Faucets >
Soap Dispensers >
Sink Accessories >
Water Purification >
Sink Saver >
Bathroom Sinks >
Bathroom Faucets >
Whitehaus makes high-quality sinks for kitchens of every size, shape and design. A variety of configurations are available, including single-bowl, double-bowl, triple bowl, apron front, entertainment/prep, undermount and drop-in to suit any kitchen decor. Choose Devon, Euro, Culinary Chef, Super Chef, New England or Prohaus sinks in stainless steel, King Solomon and King Solomon II in copper or Farmer Chef, Farmer Fireclay and Quatro Alcove kitchen sinks in fireclay. The stainless steel kitchen sinks have special padding and undercoating for excellent sound deadening. Add an elegant touch to your kitchen with a beautiful and practical kitchen sink from Whitehaus.
"Great Website, helped a lot in planning my next projects"
Raymond Sweiger, JR
"I wanted to thank you for the excellent service I received after an order online."
Laura Malish
Chardon, OH
"I spent a couple of hours searching the web for kitchen storage hardware and I must say yours is by far the best I came across."
Aubrey Martin
"I received my order in just a few days and want you to know your service was great. Items were great quality and fit just right."
Mary Kline
See more testimonials >
Kraus >
Whitehaus >
Houzer >
Kraus Stainless Steel Kitchen Sinks with Kitchen Faucet with Curved Handle and Soap Dispenser have a 16-gauge premium grade T-304 stainless steel construction.
JULIEN has been rising to this challenge for the past 63 years by ingeniously fashioning stainless steel and the noblest of materials into premium kitchen sinks for the world market.
Luxury kitchen and bath products including sinks, accessories, faucets, and more.
Wide selection of kitchen sinks to integrate with the style and atmosphere of your kitchen or special room.
Franke Sinks >
Wells Sinkware >
Noah Collection >
Dawn Sinks >
Franke Sinks feature exquisite designed kitchen sinks and materials ranging from stainless steel to fireclay, granite and titanium.
Wells Sinkware offers kitchen sinks in single, double and triple bowl designs. Made of premium 304 series stainless steel and have an exclusive unpolished finish.
The Noah Collection kitchen sinks are high-quality stainless steel sinks made of corrosion-resistant 304 series stainless steel in thicknesses ranging from 16-gauge to 20-gauge.
The Dawn Sinks premium kitchen sinks are made from 304 Series Japanese Stainless Steel, highly regarded as the highest quality steel on today market.
Nantucket Sinks >
Vigo >
John Boos >
Aero >
Single bowls or double bowls, these kitchen sinks are available in stainless steel to ensure resistance to corrosion and solid brass for long-lasting life with minimal maintenance.
Vigo undermount, topmount and farmhouse stainless steel kitchen sinks.
Hand sinks, commercial sinks, convenience store sinks, etc.
These Hand Sinks by Aero are ideal for industrial or home applications. The sinks are constructed from 304 stainless steel and includes faucets and basket strainers.
Empire >
Advance Tabco >
Cantrio Koncepts >
Karran Sinks >
These premium quality stainless steel sinks from Empire are available in various designs and sizes.
These high-quality stainless steel kitchen sinks are available in many different styles and sizes.
Kitchen Sinks made of the highest quality of 18-gauge 304 stainless steel which is rust, mold and mildew resistance.
Karran Sinks are made of high-grade acrylics reinforced with polyester/fiberglass for long-lasting strength and appearance.
InSinkErator >
InSinkErator offers a wide range of Garbage Disposals to choose from, available in a variety of strengths for any kitchen's needs.
Kitchen Accessories
Cabinet Accessories
Bathroom Accessories
Home Accessories
Shop by Category
Undermount Sinks
Drop-In Sinks
Bar/Entertainment Sinks
Utility Sinks
Front Apron Sinks
Kitchen Sink Sets
Garbage Disposals
Sink Accessories
What's New!
On Sale
Shop by Brand
Cantrio Koncepts Kitchen Sinks
Dawn Kitchen Sinks
Empire Kitchen Sinks
Franke Kitchen Sinks
Houzer Kitchen Sinks
JULIEN Kitchen Sinks
Karran Kitchen Sinks
Kraus Kitchen Sinks
Nantucket Kitchen Sinks
Noah by Whitehaus Sinks
Vigo Kitchen Sinks
Wells Sinkware
Whitehaus Kitchen Sinks
Commercial Sinks
Advance Tabco Sinks
John Boos Kitchen Sinks
Aero Kitchen Sinks
Related Products
Sink Accessories
Bathroom Faucets
Bathroom Sinks
Kitchen Faucets
Life Flo
(water purification)
Soap Dispensers
Stainless Steel Sink Guard
Customer Care
About Us
Contact Us
Terms and Policies
Order Status
Helpful Resources
Gift Certificates
Shop by Brand
Product Index
Customer Service
About Us
Contact Us
Gift Certificates
Order Status
Shipping Info
Return Policy
Privacy Policy
Security Info
Product Index
Fair Price Guarantee
The Truth About KitchenSource Coupons
Follow @KitchenSource
an Aoife Company LLC Store
1136-1146 Stratford Avenue, Stratford, CT 06615
Tel: (203) 374-5425 Fax: (203) 373-0810


text:
7 U.S. Code § 8108 - Biomass research and development
(a) Definitions
In this section:
(1) Biobased product
The term "biobased product" means—
(2) Demonstration
The term "demonstration" means demonstration of technology in a pilot plant or semi-works scale facility, including a plant or facility located on a farm.
(b) Cooperation and coordination in biomass research and development
(1) In general
The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Energy shall coordinate policies and procedures that promote research and development regarding the production of biofuels and biobased products.
(2) Points of contact
To coordinate research and development programs and activities relating to biofuels and biobased products that are carried out by their respective departments—
(A) the Secretary of Agriculture shall designate, as the point of contact for the Department of Agriculture, an officer of the Department of Agriculture appointed by the President to a position in the Department before the date of the designation, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate; and
(c) Biomass Research and Development Board
(1) Establishment
There is established the Biomass Research and Development Board to carry out the duties described in paragraph (3).
(2) Membership
The Board shall consist of—
(A) the point of contacts of the Department of Energy and the Department of Agriculture, who shall serve as cochairpersons of the Board;
(B) a senior officer of each of the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, each of whom shall have a rank that is equivalent to the rank of the points of contact; and
(3) Duties
The Board shall—
(A) coordinate research and development activities relating to biofuels and biobased products—
(C) ensure that—
(4) Funding
Each agency represented on the Board is encouraged to provide funds for any purpose under this section.
(d) Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee
(1) Establishment
There is established the Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee to carry out the duties described in paragraph (3).
(2) Membership
(A) In general
The Advisory Committee shall consist of—
(iii) an individual affiliated with an institution of higher education who has expertise in biofuels and biobased products;
(iv) 2 prominent engineers or scientists from government or academia who have expertise in biofuels and biobased products;
(vii) an individual associated with State government who has expertise in biofuels and biobased products;
(3) Duties
The Advisory Committee shall—
(B) evaluate and make recommendations in writing to the Board regarding whether—
(i) funds authorized for the Initiative are distributed and used in a manner that is consistent with the objectives, purposes, and considerations of the Initiative;
(iii) objectives and evaluation criteria of the solicitations are clearly stated and minimally prescriptive, with no areas of special interest;
(iv) the points of contact are funding proposals under this chapter that are selected on the basis of merit, as determined by an independent panel of scientific and technical peers predominantly from outside the Departments of Agriculture and Energy; and
(4) Coordination
To avoid duplication of effort, the Advisory Committee shall coordinate its activities with those of other Federal advisory committees working in related areas.
(e) Biomass Research and Development Initiative
(1) In general
The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Energy, acting through their respective points of contact and in consultation with the Board, shall establish and carry out a Biomass Research and Development Initiative under which competitively awarded grants, contracts, and financial assistance are provided to, or entered into with, eligible entities to carry out research on and development and demonstration of—
(2) Objectives
The objectives of the Initiative are to develop—
(A) technologies and processes necessary for abundant commercial production of biofuels at prices competitive with fossil fuels;
(B) high-value biobased products—
(3) Technical areas
The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and heads of other appropriate departments and agencies (referred to in this subsection as the "Secretaries"), shall direct the Initiative in the 3 following areas:
(A) Feedstocks development
Research, development, and demonstration activities regarding feedstocks and feedstock logistics (including the harvest, handling, transport, preprocessing, and storage) relevant to production of raw materials for conversion to biofuels and biobased products.
(B) Biofuels and biobased products development
Research, development, and demonstration activities to support—
(i) the development of diverse cost-effective technologies for the use of cellulosic biomass in the production of biofuels and biobased products; and
(C) Biofuels development analysis
(i) Strategic guidance The development of analysis that provides strategic guidance for the application of renewable biomass technologies to improve sustainability and environmental quality, cost effectiveness, security, and rural economic development.
(ii) Energy and environmental impact Development of systematic evaluations of the impact of expanded biofuel production on the environment (including forest land) and on the food supply for humans and animals, including the improvement and development of tools for life cycle analysis of current and potential biofuels.
(4) Additional considerations
Within the technical areas described in paragraph (3), the Secretaries shall support research and development—
(A) to create continuously expanding opportunities for participants in existing biofuels production by seeking synergies and continuity with current technologies and practices;
(B) to maximize the environmental, economic, and social benefits of production of biofuels and derived biobased products on a large scale; and
(5) Eligibility
To be eligible for a grant, contract, or assistance under this section, an applicant shall be—
(6) Administration
(A) In general
After consultation with the Board, the points of contact shall—
(i) publish annually 1 or more joint requests for proposals for grants, contracts, and assistance under this subsection;
(ii) require that grants, contracts, and assistance under this section be awarded based on a scientific peer review by an independent panel of scientific and technical peers;
(iii) give special consideration to applications that—
(B) Cost share
(i) Research and development projects
(I) In general Except as provided in subclause (II), the non-Federal share of the cost of a research or development project under this section shall be not less than 20 percent.
(C) Technology and information transfer
The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that applicable research results and technologies from the Initiative are—
(f) Administrative support and funds
(1) In general
The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Agriculture may provide such administrative support and funds of the Department of Energy and the Department of Agriculture to the Board and the Advisory Committee as are necessary to enable the Board and the Advisory Committee to carry out their duties under this section.
(2) Other agencies
The heads of the agencies referred to in subsection (c)(2)(B), and the other members of the Board appointed under subsection (c)(2)(C), are encouraged to provide administrative support and funds of their respective agencies to the Board and the Advisory Committee.
(g) Reports
For each fiscal year for which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Agriculture shall jointly submit to Congress a detailed report on—
(1) the status and progress of the Initiative, including a report from the Advisory Committee on whether funds appropriated for the Initiative have been distributed and used in a manner that is consistent with the objectives and requirements of this section;
(2) the general status of cooperation and research and development efforts carried out at each agency with respect to biofuels and biobased products; and
(h) Funding
(1) Mandatory funding
Of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary of Agriculture shall use to carry out this section, to remain available until expended—
[1] See References in Text note below.
Source(Pub. L. 107–171, title IX, § 9008, as added Pub. L. 110–234, title IX, § 9001(a),May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1318, and Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a), title IX, § 9001(a),June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2079; amended Pub. L. 112–240, title VII, § 701(f)(7),Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2365; Pub. L. 113–79, title IX, § 9008,Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 931.)
References in Text
Section 5925e of this title, referred to in subsec. (e)(6)(C)(ii), was repealed by Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, § 7212(a),Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 886.
Pub. L. 110–234and Pub. L. 110–246enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234was repealed by section 4(a) ofPub. L. 110–246.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 8108,Pub. L. 107–171, title IX, § 9010,May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 485, related to continuation of bioenergy program, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 110–246. See section 8105 of this title.
A prior section 9008 ofPub. L. 107–171amended title III of Pub. L. 106–224, which was classified to chapter 112 (§ 8601 et seq.) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–246, § 9001(b).
2014—Subsec. (h)(1)(E). Pub. L. 113–79, § 9008(1), added subpar. (E).
Subsec. (h)(2). Pub. L. 113–79, § 9008(2), substituted "$20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018" for "$35,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2013".
2013—Subsec. (h)(2). Pub. L. 112–240substituted "2013" for "2012".
Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–240effective Sept. 30, 2012, see section 701(j) ofPub. L. 112–240, set out in a 1-Year Extension of Agricultural Programs note under section 8701 of this title.
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.


text:
Nitric Oxide, LPS and the Pathogenesis of Asthma Phase II
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The purpose of the study is to determine the role of nitric oxide (NO) in asthma and to characterize the symptoms associated with inhaled endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]) in normal subjects. In this study, we will determine the effect of inhaled endotoxin on exhaled NO in healthy African Americans, with and without NOS2 promoter polymorphisms. The protocol described in this submission will involve the use of NIH Clinical Center Reference Endotoxin which has been approved by the FDA under IND BB-IND-10035.
Biological: LPS endotoxin
Phase 1
|Study Type:
|Study Design:
|Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
|Official Title:
|Nitric Oxide, LPS and the Pathogenesis of Asthma - Phase II
- Differential response to inhaled LPS based on NOS2 inhibition. [ Time Frame: 24 hours with optional 48 hr,72hr and 7 day follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Physiologic measurements [ Time Frame: 24 hours with optional return up at 48 hrs, 72hrs and 7 day follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|Study Start Date:
|April 2003
|Study Completion Date:
|December 2009
|Primary Completion Date:
|July 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|Assigned Interventions
Experimental: 1
Sterile Saline, LPS endotoxin
Biological: LPS endotoxin
Low challenge: saline (diluent), 5000EU, 10,000EU and 20,000EU LPS endotoxin as tolerated
High challenge: Saline (diluent), 40,000EU and 80,000EU as tolerated
Diluent Challenge: 3 X Sterile saline inhalation (2 ml)
Other Names:
Show Detailed Description
|Ages Eligible for Study:
|18 Years to 40 Years
|Genders Eligible for Study:
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willing/able to give informed consent & adhere to visit/protocol schedules
- non-atopic, non-asthmatic by PFT and allergy skin testing
- never cigarette smoker,
- no significant occupational exposure to respiratory irritants or toxins,
- no chronic illness
- no chronic use of medications (excluding contraceptive medication),
- no systemic corticosteroid use in the previous month,
- no historical or physical examination evidence of unstable cardiac or severe lung disease,
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test
- baseline FEV1 > 80% of the predicted value,
- no clinically significant abnormalities on the chest x-ray or EKG
Exclusion Criteria:
- occupational exposure to hay or grain
- smoked 20 or more packs of cigarettes in a lifetime.
- prior allergen immunotherapy
- Allergy to potential study medications acetaminophen and albuterol
- Subjects who abuse alcohol or illicit substances will be excluded
- Viral respiratory infection within the previous 14 days
- Students or employees under direct supervision by protocol investigators are ineligible
- Nursing mothers
- Other investigational medication within the last 30 days
- Other medical or psychological conditions which, in the opinion of the investigator, might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00643058
|United States, North Carolina
|Duke University Medical Center
|Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
|Principal Investigator:
|John C Sundy, M.D. PhD
|Duke University
No publications provided
|Responsible Party:
|John Sundy, Associate Professor of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
|NCT00643058 History of Changes
|Other Study ID Numbers:
|Pro00005035, Pro00005035, 12496-CP-006B
|Study First Received:
|March 24, 2008
|Last Updated:
|July 15, 2013
|Health Authority:
|United States: Food and Drug Administration
United States: Institutional Review Board
Keywords provided by Duke University:
LPS endotoxin
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Nitric Oxide
Anti-Asthmatic Agents
Autonomic Agents
Bronchodilator Agents
Cardiovascular Agents
Endothelium-Dependent Relaxing Factors
Free Radical Scavengers
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Neurotransmitter Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Pharmacologic Actions
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Protective Agents
Respiratory System Agents
Therapeutic Uses
Vasodilator Agents
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 13, 2015


text:
Best of News
An Egyptian protester argues with a riot policeman during a... News Photo2012-2013 Northern Mali Conflict,Arguing,Cairo,Conflict,Demonstration,Egypt,French Culture,Horizontal,Islam,Mali,Middle East,Organisation,Police Force,Protestor,RiotPhotographer GIANLUIGI GUERCIACollection: AFP 2013 AFPAn Egyptian protester argues with a riot policeman during a demonstration organised by Egyptian Islamists against the French intervention in Mali on January 18, 2013 in Cairo. The brother of Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri joined dozens of Egyptian Islamists in a protest near the French embassy in Cairo. AFP PHOTO/GIANLUIGI GUERCIA (Photo credit should read GIANLUIGI GUERCIA/AFP/Getty Images)