text:
Arena Profile: Ex-SOS Jennifer Brunner
Former Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat, served as Ohio's 52nd and first woman Secretary of State from 2007-2011. She was elected in 2006, winning 52 of Ohio's 88 counties with a 15-point lead in a four-way race, besting her Republican opponent in his home county, the state's largest Republican stronghold. Her charge was to clean up Ohio's election problems and restore the trust of the nation. Her goal was simple: Ohio elections that are fair and accessible to all eligible voters. With experience as a twice-elected trial court judge and as an elections attorney in the Secretary of State's office, along with 13 years of election law private practice in a firm she started in the corner of her bedroom with 3 small children, she took on the task with serious and determined effort.
Ohio's 2008 presidential election was a smooth election with a record number of voters. She accomplished this, in part, by demanding the resignations of all members of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, a demand that ultimately led to a new board that has helped move the state forward, being the first to offer bilingual ballots for its significant Spanish speaking population. She worked to further improve elections in the state, convening summits that brought together stakeholders from across the nation to give input on improving Ohio's election process.
Jennifer Brunner created, "Better Lives, Better Ohio," the nation's first web-based index of life quality indicators for jobs and progress in helping Ohio return to prosperity and continues to work with her Republican successor's administration to ensure the program's continuity.
Jennifer Brunner was elected twice judge of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court where she pioneered the practice of allowing jurors to ask questions and started the county's first adult felony drug court. She did not run for reelection as Secretary of State, instead running to be Ohio's first woman U.S. Senator in a tough Democratic primary where the Governor endorsed her opponent, a 30-year candidate. Outspent nearly 4 to 1, she garnered 45% of the vote with no television advertising.
Jennifer Brunner has happily returned to the practice of law at the law firm she started many years ago and continues to advocate through the recently formed Courage PAC for continuing election and campaign reforms, financial reform and better government. For her dedication to public service, in 2008 Jennifer Brunner was awarded the prestigious John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for, what Caroline Kennedy called, "her dauntless commitment to the enfranchisement of every Ohio voter." She is a mother of three adult children and married to her husband, Rick, also an attorney, since 1978.
Ex-SOS Jennifer Brunner's Recent Discussions
A Commerce Clause trap?
Considering that the chief justice practically hissed "Hussein," the president's middle name, when he swore him into office, that his opinion, which reaches the right result, would leave the Republicans an "out" to argue "taxes" is sadly not surprising. No federal judge should be buffering any opinion for political considerations, whether she or he is liberal or conservative. It doesn't matter what conservatives think of Justice Roberts or his opinions. He is appointed for life. He and anyone else in his position would best serve the country by zealously evincing and guarding independence and fairness.
For the rule of law to be respected and democracy to flourish, its keepers must demonstrate its power through humility and in respect of it. That starts with unapologetic opinions that do not take a politically expedient legal basis that is a stretch at best for a ruling that should be based more in precedent than political delicacy.
But, then again, the Amreican people have this court to thank for the Citizens United decision. So, with all this said, it's probably not a good idea to look a gift horse in the mouth, of course, unless you're paying tax on it.See more
Will the Arizona decision boost Obama?
Americans remain strongly divided on the issue of immigration reform. What's confounding is to watch the media conjecture on this issue, concluding that the economy remains the major issue for voters, and the immigration issue is corollary. The real fact is that reaching reforms on immigration-related issues will actually help improve the economic outlook for more Americans. When will the media and those holding and seeking office make that connection?
Reforming America's immigration laws and enforcement will build needed faith in the nation's immigration system and stop unscrupulous employers from cheating the system by taking away otherwise decent jobs by using undocumented workers who often are at the same time cheated by these same employers who take shortcuts that often threaten their security and safety. In short, comprehensive immigration reform makes a stronger America.
Mitt Romney's statement that the decision shows that the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities took Congress' lack of political will on its ear in turning it toward the President, especially in light of his executive order that essentially accomplished the ends of the Dream Act. For those who limit their viewership to Fox News, the opinion will be that Arizona won and the President lost. Nothing could be further from the truth. If the Obama campaign and Latino organizing organizations can turn out Latino voters in spite of the recently enacted myriad state laws bent to make voter registration and voting more difficult, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision should help the President's prospects for reelection. But the President's campaign and other groups should connect the dots on how immigration reform helps create more and better jobs and improves the American economy. It's not just about fairness. It's about what's good for all of us.
See more
Posted onJul. 12, 2012
Posted onJul. 11, 2012
Posted onJul. 10, 2012
Posted onJul. 09, 2012
Posted onJul. 06, 2012
Posted onJul. 05, 2012
Posted onJul. 03, 2012
Recent Arenas
- Condi Rice for VP?
- Smear job against Romney on Bain?
- Eric Holder right on voter ID law?
- Obamacare repeal vote - substance or show?
- President Obama's tax cut strategy a winner?
- What voting groups will decide the election?
- Do more GOP or Dem SCOTUS picks go awry?
- GOP governors a backstop against Obamacare?
- An Anthony Weiner comeback?
- A Commerce Clause trap?
Arena Referees
Arena Players
Current and Former Elected Officials
- Former Rep. Michael Arcuri (D-N.Y.)
- Former Rep. Bob Beauprez (R-Colo.)
- Former Ohio SOS Ken Blackwell (R)
- Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)
- Rep. Dan Boren (D-Okla.)
- Rep. Charles Boustany
- State Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.)
- Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas)
- Former Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite (R-Fla.)
- Ex-SOS Jennifer Brunner
- Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.)
- Assemblyman Robert Castelli (R-N.Y.)
- Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.)
- Rep. Gerald Connolly (D-Va.)
- Former Rep. Artur Davis
- Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.)
- Former Rep. Philip English
- State Sen. Will Espero
- Rep. Sam Farr
- Former Rep. Martin Frost
- Rep. John Garamendi
- Rep. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.)
- Rep. Jim Gerlach
- Rep. Charles Gonzalez (D-Texas)
- Rep. Tim Griffin (R-Ark.)
- Former State Rep. Jason Grill
- Del. Nancy Guthrie
- Rep. Rush Holt
- Rep. Michael Honda (D-Calif.)
- Rep. Tim Johnson (R-Ill.)
- Former Sen. Ted Kaufman
- Rep. Barbara Lee
- Rep. Dan Lungren
- State Sen. Tim Mathern (D-N.D.)
- Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.)
- Rep. Mick Mulvaney
- Former State Rep. David Orentlicher (D-Ind.)
- Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.)
- Former N.M. Gov. Bill Richardson (D)
- Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and Robert Sisson, President of ConservAmerica
- Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.)
- Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio)
- Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)
- Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.)
- Former State Sen. Jeff Smith (D-Mo.)
- Former State Rep. Fran Wendelboe (R)
- Former N.J. Gov. Christine Todd Whitman
- Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.)
- Rep. Rob Woodall (R-Ga.)
Strategists, Scholars and Authors
- Alfonso Aguilar
- Richard Albert
- Richard V. Allen
- John Anzalone
- Jerome Armstrong
- Christopher Arterton
- Leif Babin
- Ross Baker
- Dean Baker
- Joanne Bamberger
- Brad Bannon
- Gary L. Bauer
- Richard Benedetto
- Mary Frances Berry
- Rick Beyer
- David Biespiel
- Bill Bishop
- Elizabeth Blackney
- David Boaz
- Adam Bonin
- Ron Bonjean
- Robert L. Borosage
- David N. Bossie
- Lara Brown
- Barry Burden
- Jano Cabrera
- Steven G. Calabresi
- James Carafano
- Maria Cardona
- Jamie Chandler
- Ron Christie
- Dewey Clayton
- Marjorie Clifton
- David B. Cohen
- Rory Cooper
- Jonathan Cowan
- Chester Crocker
- Joe Crummey
- Brendan Daly
- Stephen M. Davidson
- Soren Dayton
- Chris DeRose
- Donna Robinson Divine
- David Donnelly
- Patrick Dorinson
- Greg Dworkin
- Corey Ealons
- Mo Elleithee
- Ed Espinoza
- Ron Faucheux
- Gloria Feldt
- Ken Feltman
- Peter Fenn
- Thomas E. Fiedler
- Michael Fitts
- Karen Floyd
- Mike Fraioli
- Luke Frans
- Amy Fried
- Diana Furchtgott-Roth
- Daniella Gibbs Leger
- Lisa Gilbert
- Andra Gillespie
- Tom Giovanetti
- Ed Goeas
- Adam Green
- Christian Grose
- Christopher Hahn
- Gretchen Hamel
- Stefan Hankin
- Trey Hardin
- David A. Harris
- Richard Hasen
- Gerald Hebert
- Paul Henderson
- Chris Henick
- Stephen Hess
- Donna Hoffman
- Jason Huff
- Bud Jackson
- Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
- Victor Kamber
- Richard Keil
- Phil Kerpen
- Karen Kerrigan
- Sally Kohn
- Tom Korologos
- Celinda Lake
- Chris Lehane
- David Leland
- Rabbi Michael Lerner
- Curt A. Levey
- Steve Lombardo
- Sandy Maisel
- Jim Manley
- Thomas E. Mann
- Aaron Mannes
- Mary Anne Marsh
- Leslie Marshall
- Joe Mathews
- Jeremy Mayer
- Anita McBride
- Meredith McGehee
- John McNulty
- Eliseo Medina
- Aaron David Miller
- Peter Mirijanian
- Rodell Mollineau
- Molly Moore
- Yousef Munayyer
- Steve Murphy
- Josh Nanberg
- Ron Nehring
- Grover Norquist
- Ford O'Connell
- Margie Omero
- Michael Parkin
- Scott Paterno
- Joel Payne
- Christine Pelosi
- Brad Phillips
- Roger Pilon
- Kevin Pirch
- David Polyansky
- Clyde Prestowitz
- Jonathan Prince
- Cortland Putbrese
- Ari Rabin-Havt
- Rachel Racusen
- Nick Ragone
- Elayne Rapping
- Jonathan Riehl
- Peter Roff
- Ryan Rudominer
- Sal Russo
- Dante Scala
- Sabrina L. Schaeffer
- Cliff Schecter
- Dan Schnur
- Eric Schnurer
- Alex Schriver
- Alan Schroeder
- Michael Shank
- Eileen Shields-West
- Craig Shirley
- Michael A. Siegel
- Carlos Sierra
- Cliff Sims
- Richard M. Skinner
- Theda Skocpol
- Eileen Smith
- Bradley A. Smith
- Ilya Somin
- Garry South
- Jason Stanford
- Steve Steckler
- Michael S. Steele
- Jeffrey C. Stewart
- Michele L. Swers
- Jeffrey Taylor
- Don Taylor
- Doug Thornell
- Don Todd
- Brad Todd
- Tevi Troy
- Joshua A. Tucker
- Joshua Ulibarri
- Charles Walcott
- Janelle Ward
- Doug Wead
- Mark Weinberg
- Darrell M. West
- Drew Westen
- Robert White
- Michael Yaki
- Lou Zickar
- James J. Zogby
More POLITICO Arena
About the Arena
The Arena is a cross-party, cross-discipline forum for intelligent and lively conversation about political and policy issues. Contributors have been selected by POLITICO staff and editors. David Mark, Arena's moderator, is a Senior Editor at POLITICO. Each morning, POLITICO sends a question based on that day's news to all contributors.Frequently Asked Questions


text:
Register now for free, or sign in with any of these services:
Want to set your local edition?
Select an edition for more focused local news coverage when you visit NOLA.com.
Don't worry. You can change this setting at any time to another local edition.
I believe if you don't get better you get worse...no standing pat. This past draft we didn't get better we got worse..no help for the defense and we wasted a no 1 pick on another tennessee w/r. Dwayne Bowe selected later in the first round had 97 yards and a touchdown for KC yesterday. The best result from next week is another loss, our defense can't stop anyone and we need as high a pick as possible to get some HELP for the defense. I still believe Payton is a good coach and we will win with him in charge. The offense can't be expected to carry the defense any longer.....Merry Christmas

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Europe's biggest names suffered mixed fortunes during the fourth round of matches in this season's UEFA Champions League. Neutral fans were happy, however, with 52 goals being scored in the 16 matches (21 during Tuesday's games, 31 on Wednesday), at an average of just over three per game!
Arsenal (Group B) and Lyon (Group F) were among the headliners, with both teams now already qualified for the next phase after winning their first four games. Barcelona (Group C), who thrashed Panathinaikos 5-0 thanks to a hat-trick from Samuel Eto'o, currently boast the most prolific attack with 11 goals. The Catalans have qualified for the next round, as have their arch rivals from Madrid. Despite losing to Lyon 0-3 in the opening round of games, Real (Group F) are through to the second phase after winning 2-0 in Rosenborg.
Thierry Henry was once again to the fore in Arsenal's 3-0 win over Sparta Prague, but the highlight of the evening was indisputably Lyon, who beat Greek side Olympiakos 4-1 away, after finding themselves 0-1 down after three minutes. As Henry did for Arsenal, so Brazilian Juninho got his team heading in the right direction, converting a direct free-kick in the 22nd minute to get Lyon on level terms, before turning provider later on with an assist from another set piece.
AC Milan, on the other hand, lost 1-0 in The Netherlands to PSV Eindhoven, meaning that they failed to find the net in 180 minutes of football against a Dutch team which lost two of its star players (Van Bommel and Park) before the season began. This despite the fact that Carlo Ancelotti has an embarrassment of riches up front, with Alberto Gilardino, Filippo Inzaghi, Christian Vieri and Andryi Shevchenko to choose from.
Manchester in the mire
Manchester United are another club currently in the doldrums, following up a 1-4 thrashing at Middlesbrough in the Premier League with a defeat at the Stade de France by last season's French runners-up Lille. The club from the North of France have managed to rack up five points, despite scoring only one goal in four games. Without Roy Keane and Paul Scholes in the line-up, the Red Devils seem to have no conduit between defence and attack and are struggling to play their football.
AC Milan and Manchester United are both third of their groups (D and E), and therefore desperately need a win on 23 November, at Fenerbahce (last in Group E) and at home to Villareal (top of Group D) respectively. Speaking of Villareal, the Spanish "yellow submarines" won 1-0 in Lisbon against Benfica to record their first ever Champions League victory.
Juventus (Group A) got back to winning ways thanks to goal-getter David Trezeguet. Having lost the away match 2-1 in Munich and taken a beating on Saturday in the San Siro, the Old Lady of Turin got a spring back in her step by turning the tables on Bayern, 2-1. Fabio Capello hailed Trezeguet's performance, calling him "the best striker in the world" after a brace of goals which put him 10th in Juve's all-time scoring list on 106, two more than his illustrious fellow Frenchman Michel Platini, who notched 104.
Goals aplenty in Group C
Match of the day was undoubtedly in Bremen, where it looked as though Werder were strolling to victory, leading Udinese 3-0 some five minutes into the second half. Within the space of six minutes, however, the Italians had taken advantage of some slack play by the Germans to draw level, in what must be some kind of record. Bremen regained the lead seven minutes later, however, this time for good, with playmaker Johan Micoud scoring his second to make the final score 4-3. Group C seems to be a happy hunting ground for goal-scorers - with 12 scored in two matches last night (seven in Bremen, five in Barcelona) - one short of the Champions League record.
As for the current Champions League holders, Liverpool quietly moved to the top of Group G with a comfortable 3-0 win over Anderlecht. Should they avoid defeat at home to Real Betis in their next game, they will qualify for the next phase - a result which would take the pressure off them before they have to go to Chelsea on the final evening. José Mourinho's men surprisingly went down to a 1-0 defeat in Seville, despite the fact that Betis were struggling with injuries.
Finally, in Group H, Inter Milan were grateful to their Argentinean super-sub Julio Ricardo Cruz, whose two goals (75' pen. and 82') gave them a 2-1 win over Porto, relegating the former European champions to last place in their group. It was of little consolation to the 2004 Champions League winners that Hugo Almeida's 35-yard free-kick was the finest goal of the day.


text:
Updated: 01/30/2013 7:11 AM KSTP.com By: Todd Wilson
A Minneapolis woman spoke with us while hiding her face. She is nervous. She is the victim of a burglary on 4th avenue in South Minneapolis.
"After no one had been around a few days, somebody pushed through a air conditioning unit, came in the back window," the victim said.
She says it was a Saturday, a day that's never been the same.
"You're a little scared and you feel like you are being watched," the victim said.
She isn't alone, in a crime update from the Third Precinct, sector 3. It shows over 30 burglaries between January 4th to the 26th of this year, that's 22 days. The numbers are not a surprise but the time of day is alarming. Most happened during the day and five of them while someone was home.
The area is on the south side of East 42nd Street to Crosstown Highway between I-35W and Minnehaha Avenue. The third precinct says last year they had 98 burglaries and 95 so far this year.
Julie Hample is the block leader of her neighborhood. She points out the houses in her community that have been broken into. She says she felt like a sitting duck.
"It's a terrible feeling, in your own home and feel like you are a target," Hample said.
Minneapolis police say citywide burglaries are flat through Tuesday night for the year at 312.
Here's a few suggestions the police are giving to help prevent a burglary. If someone knocks on your door, go see who it is, it doesn't mean you have to answer it.
Next, you want to check your windows and doors. You want to make sure no one has been trying to pry them open.
And here's another suggestion, if you are going out of town or leaving for the day tell a neighbor you trust so they watch out for you house. And if you see anything suspicious, call 911.


text:
The Orfalea Foundation Downtown Center is available on occasion for limited use by our partner organizations. Unfortunately, the space is no longer available for general use by other corporate or non-profit groups. For more information, please contact firstname.lastname@example.com.
Frequently Asked Questions
For over a decade, most of our work has been driven by The Orfalea Fund. Conceived in 2003 as a limited-life entity, The Orfalea Fund was designed to achieve ambitious goals in a concentrated time-frame and, with the help of our partners, has transformed Santa Barbara County's disaster readiness status, school food reform, preschool quality, and educational and youth development opportunities. We set out to create sustainable results, not a perpetual organization.
By December 2015, we will complete the planned spend-down of The Orfalea Fund, while devoting more of our resources to sharing what we have learned – providing the benefit of our experience to other nonprofits, funders, and policy-makers working on early childhood education, food system reform (especially school food), experiential youth development, education, and community disaster readiness. We have every confidence that our existing partners and other organizations will continue to achieve great successes in these arenas of public concern and community well-being.
As a result of the spend-down, The Orfalea Foundation is not soliciting new grant requests or engaging in new ventures at this time. Our present scope of work is directly related to the long-term sustainability of our existing initiatives and focus areas, in collaboration with current partners. The Orfalea Foundation continues to work for the empowerment of individuals and strengthening of communities as we wind down The Orfalea Fund. On behalf of the Orfalea family and the Orfalea Foundation, we thank you for your partnership and support over the years.
Note: We are collecting stories from current and historical partners about the experience of working with the Orfalea Foundation. If you would like to contribute a memory, please contact email@example.com. Thank you.
The Orfalea Family Foundation is a private non-profit foundation that reflects the personal interest areas of the Orfalea family. The Orfalea Fund is a non-profit public benefit corporation and a supporting organization of the Santa Barbara Foundation, a community foundation and publicly supported charity. We refer to them collectively as the Orfalea Foundation. Our granting process is initiated by invitation only, and upon receipt of a Letter of Inquiry or Grant Application, the application is directed to the appropriate foundation.
What We Support
Our mission statement and areas of concentration are provided as strong guidelines to give applicants a good sense of the kinds of projects which are most likely to be funded. Letters of Inquiry can only be submitted to the Aware & Prepare Initiative and School Food Initiative. Our general granting process is by invitation only and emphasizes projects and programs that fall slightly outside of our initiatives, but that reflect the overall spirit of our mission.
Grantee Eligibility
Currently, our grantmaking process is by invitation only. If your organization believes it has a project that matches the areas of focus for the Aware & Prepare Initiative or the School Food Initiative, a Letter of Inquiry per the instructions on the Granting section, can be submitted. Once a Letter of Inquiry is reviewed, and if it is approved, then the applicant is notified to submit a full Grant Application. For technical assistance please email firstname.lastname@example.com.
Letters of Inquiry
There is no need to submit more than one Letter of Inquiry as long as it is made clear that there are requests for two different programs. If approved, we will let you know whether each project requires a separate application. It is important that any organization submitting applications for more than one project (usually larger organizations) make a careful determination that the projects are indeed separate. Two elements of one undertaking, for example, funds for emergency preparedness public education and outreach and funds for disaster kits, would be considered the same project.
The Online Application and Evaluation Reports
A message will appear on-screen at the end of your application session telling you that your application has been successfully submitted. You will also receive a confirmation email from the database administrator once it has been downloaded by the Foundation. Sending a hard copy of the application is not necessary. You may want to keep a print out for your own records. We will contact you if we need further information.
Santa Barbara Foundation
The Orfalea Family Foundation is a private non-profit foundation that reflects the personal interest areas of the Orfalea family. The Orfalea Fund is a non-profit public benefit corporation and a supporting organization of the Santa Barbara Foundation, a community foundation and publicly supported charity. We refer to them collectively as the Orfalea Foundation. Our granting process is initiated by invitation only, and upon receipt of a Letter of Inquiry or Grant Application, the application is directed to the appropriate entity. The Orfalea Foundation has had a multi-year relationship with the Santa Barbara Foundation, and annually makes a contribution toward their competitive Strategy Grants, Express Grants, and Non-profit Excellence. This collaboration has produced a greater return per philanthropic dollar and reduces work for agencies that have sought support from both foundations. For more information on this partnership, please visit our Santa Barbara Foundation Partnership page.


text:
Register now for free, or sign in with any of these services:
Hi folks, Susan here. Thanks to everyone for their comments.
Hi Jackrobby-- If I had a dollar for every time we debated faith healing, I could buy myself an iPad by now (or at least a lot of apps)! Good points. Couple things:
1. We were not told the problem was solved in 1999, when the Legislature removed about half of the special protections in criminal law. The end result was quite clearly a half-a-loaf piece of compromise legislation that left the double standard intact.
2. I don't think Oregon must choose between prevention and sanctions, as if were an either/or situation. Obviously, prevention is the best remedy for any situation involving child endangerment. But sometimes, those prevention efforts fail. The fact that preventive measures sometimes fail (whether because the parents are careless, cruel, drug-addicted, misguided, overwhelmed or something else) is not a reason for the state to excuse, minimize or enable the suffering or deaths of children. (Also, I'd wager that virtually all criminal laws fail to deter all criminals, whether the crime is murder or burglary or drug-dealing or child abuse. Deterrence is only one factor in criminal law.)
3. Clackamas County prosecutors (John Foote and Greg Horner) have done a lot of advocacy and outreach to prevent these terrible situations. They've also prosecuted cases when all else has failed. They've both said the *point* of this legislation is not to throw the book at parents. The point is to have a clear standard for all parents. They don't want the state to continue sending the mixed message that it is *sometimes* OK to let your child suffer at length or die from a treatable illness. Removing the double standard from criminal law is one of many ways to stop sending that mixed message.
I'll ask you this, Jack: If *you* were in the Legislature, what specific kind of legislation or action would you champion as most effective?
Hi folks, me again. Almost forgot these voice mails....
1. A woman who didn't leave her name left this voice message: "We are Portlanders just wanting to thank you for your honest expression about being a person who has sort of given up on church. We appreciated your honesty and, certainly, you have that choice to make about whether to go to church. We do go regularly and find it to be a wonderful blessing in our lives. ... . We go to a very large Foursquare church and I can tell you that it is not dogmatic; it is very friendly. ... It does sound to us like you are a person without any spiritual connection. You sound to us very secular, and frankly, you sound hollow. I hope that you can get out of that and join the rest of us and find that life has meaning because we are connected to God. Thanks again."
2. Another woman who didn't leave her name left this voice mail. First, she described her church in Beaverton in very positive terms, then said, "I'm a transported New Yorker, and I'm here 35 years, and I see more of the love of God here than I ever did in New York. You don't have to go to a building to see God, or to be with God. He's in your heart, and he's with you always. God bless you."
3. Thomas G. in Otis left this voice mail: "On this Sunday, you're probably at an Easter service right now. When you refer to church, I assume you're referring to Christian houses of worships and excluding synagogues or mosques. For those of us who are not Christians, Muslims or Jews, going to church is irrelevant, for people who have a rationalist point of view. My mother was a Christian. I chose not to be a Christian. It's important that we understand that freedom of religion can also mean freedom *from* religion. Your cultural take on the whole thing is not necessarily anyone else's take. If you feel guilt for your problem, that's OK, but I don't feel any guilt about it at all. Anyway, I wish ya luck."
Hi folks, Susan here. Happy Easter! Thanks to everyone who read, wrote and e-mailed. It's great to hear people's points of view. Below is a sampler of some of the e-mails that landed in my inbox over the weekend. They included numerous kind invitations to church services.
1. Kristi W. of Portland sent this e-mail: "Thanks for your article on church and faith in Portland. I am one of those Portland weirdos who actually does attend church weekly. It is hard sometimes not to feel like one of the only people groups *not* embraced in our open-minded city! What I have found, though, is that there really is a deep spirituality in the people of Portland. Those who do practice corporate worship here do not do so as merely a social event, as one may find in the Bible Belt. Faith is rich, deep, meaningful.... Also, there are many Christians here who do not feel compelled to join with other Christians each week (which is too bad, because with the right group, it is a supportive and collaborative experience!). I don't know where you live, but I would like to officially extend to you an invitation to join my small church for service tomorrow - or any Sunday. We're Oregon casual; no stain glass here. But it is truly a place where anyone is welcomed and genuine love exists: PUMP Church of Christ/ 6326 NE 6th Ave, Portland."
2. Mark R. of Wilsonville sent this e-mail: "I too am a refugee from a devout churchgoing family who faces uncomfortable feelings and choices on this most Christian of holidays. I don't like the term "unchurched" because to me it implies a lack of proper indoctrination. I am as indoctrinated as they come -- my mother a Presbyterian minister's daugher and a church organist, my dad a church deacon and elder and a singer in the choir -- but even though I can count on the fingers on one hand the number of times I have been to church in my adult life, I don't consider myself "unchurched". I was well churched. I just sought another path.
Mark continued: "My folks were the two most sincere, loving, decent Christians that one could ever hope to meet, and I honor and cherish the moral heritage they passed on to me. But I am very comfortable amongst the non-churchgoing status quo of our city. The discomfort I refer to comes from the fact that too many people, in my view, still think that no matter how far one may have strayed from the ancestral flock, one should always return to the fold on Easter. Alas, I just can't do that."
3. Virginia G. sent this e-mail: "Your article in today's paper reminded me of lots of things. Unlike you, I as a Lutheran have practiced it all my life. Baptism, confirmation, a Lutheran college. I still go every Sunday. I hope you will look for a Lutheran church somewhere. I'd offer you mine, but I live in Salem. I think once you have basic Lutheranism instilled in you, it never goes away. The fact that you wrote the article tells me that if you look, you will find something. Don't give up."
4. Pat D. sent this e-mail: "I read your Easter column with great interest. I think you captured a feeling that many have in our city when it comes church. But I can tell you there are lots of congregations where you will be greeted and welcomed. My family and I attend the Madeleine church in NE Portland. Its nearly a hundred years old and has many families that are multi generational, just like your church back home. Maybe its true that you can't go home again in a new city. Its difficult to re-create such rich memories from childhood. But you can certainly start creating brand new memories that your family will cherish as the generations stretch on past you into the future. Why don't you bring your family and check out our church? My family and I would love to host you on a Sunday of your choice and show you around. I think you'll be surprised at how open and friendly we are (for a bunch of Catholics!). Easter is a time for rebirth and renewal. Maybe its also a time to restart your rich tradition of faith. Feel free to call or email me!"
5. Erik B. sent this e-mail: "Hi, Susan. I read with interest your story about being "adrift in an unchurched city." I was raised religion-free in Portland and found Unitarian Universalism in adulthood nearly 20 years ago. Your comment about the Unitarian church being "too vague" does not mesh with my experience. Vague as in unclearly expressed? Vague as in ill-defined? Vague as in not clearly felt? That is far from the reality of how I experience Unitarian Universalism. True, we UUs do not mandate dogma that all must follow. What replaces one rigid doctrine is the notion that we are each on a free and responsible search for truth, and that this search takes different forms for different people. Unitarians do generally follow seven principles, the first of which is to honor the inherent worth and dignity of every person. That is extremely specific and challenging spiritual guidance. I suggest that you visit First Unitarian Church in downtown Portland some Sunday and hear Rev. Bill Sinkford speak. There is nothing vague about his ministry or the mission of our large, thriving, liberal church. (FYI, this is as close as most UUs come to evangelizing for our religion - perhaps another cause of the misperception that we are vague since we are not driven to force our beliefs on others.)"
6. Jim C. sent this e-mail: "Thank you for your commentary in today's Oregonian. Although I am fully unchurched, I found much to appreciate in your words. You helped me visit, if only vicariously, a part of my Oregon community with which I've not before found connection. I'm still captured by your mention of "the solace of ritual and the comfort of familiar faces." I would like those. Happy Easter to you."
7. John W.of Portland sent this e-mail: "You're not writing about me with respect to the above, but why you feel "sheepish" about seeking out a "church" come Easter time is beyond me! Best would be: If you feel the want/need/wont, just find one and go."
8. David H. sent this e-mail: " Thanks for sharing your Easter memories in this Easter Sunday's Oregonian. I'd guess that most of your readers appreciated your heartwarming openness on a subject we all know well. ... I also share with you a longing for spiritual renewal. Never mind that I'm a cradle Catholic and a faithful weekly Mass-goer (did, however, lose my faith for several years in my 20s). Never mind that prayers are never far from mind and lips. Never mind that I have the support of a prayerful, wonderful wife, and the joy (and frustrations!) of "children'' and grandchildren. All the love, faith, support and joy in the world will never eliminate our longing for spiritual renewal, I don't believe. That's one thing that came to me after reading your thoughtful article. One other thing moving me to write is to invite you to try a Catholic church: specifically, the Church of the Madeleine (St. Mary Magdalene), on NE 24th Ave. between Siskiyou and Klickitat. It's Web site is http://themadeleine.edu/church_new/ ... As for Lutherans, I'm partial to you folks. My Dad was a Lutheran all his life, and my Catholic Mom couldn't have had a better mate. Unforgettable were the smorgasbords I enjoyed as a boy on Sundays with my Dad at the Finnish-Lutheran church in Astoria (we lived in Seaside). Hope I don't have to answer to God for all that I
missed in those sermons! ..."
9. Jeni W. sent this e-mail: "I was touched by your article in this morning's paper. I called your office phone and left a message, but I'm sure you will not get it until tomorrow. Thinking that you might check e-mails before, I decided to write to invite you to our church's Easter service at 10:30 AM. I attend Tualatin Presbyterian Church (USA) located on Lower Boonesferry Rd. just off Tualatin-Sherwood Rd. near the I-5 exit. We are a church numbering about 250 with a traditional and refreshing service. Our minister, Ken Evers-Hood, is a young gifted preacher of great intellect. Our church family is known for its warmth, humor, and open arms. Realizing that time and distance may preclude your attending today, I'd like to extend the invitation to any Sunday you are available. I wish you and your family Happy Easter!"
10. The Rev. Sara F. sent this e-mail: "I'm the priest at an Episcopal Church in close-in SE Portland--the absolute heart of the spiritual-but-not-religious universe--and the church is growing and people seem to be having a good time and finding what they're seeking. I hope you'll come worship with us this morning or sometime during the Great Fifty Days of Easter. I'm guessing that you'll recognize the church of your childhood in some ways and not in others. (I may be wrong, but think we're
singing a wonderful Lutheran tune during communion....) "Practicing Resurrection," to borrow a phrase from Wendell Berry, is always an adventure away from the familiar, but just think of what new and renewing grace you might find! (And we do actually have people playing with their iphones in church--just ask your husband to turn the ringer off. Our service is at 10 this morning and every Sunday; our website is below. Blessings and peace on this glorious day and always."
www.saintdavidpdx.org, 2800 SE Harrison
11. William L. sent this e-mail: "Come to Trinity Episcopal Cathedral! 8 and 10 am Easter Sunday. Lots of music... The Very Rev. William Lupfer, Trinity Episcopal Cathedral, Portland, Oregon
12. Kate B. sent this e-mail: "You would not feel like a stranger for long at my 40-member church, Colonial Heights Presbyterian. I invite you to come to today for Easter Sunday worship at 10:30 or any other Sunday. Or, join us this Wednesday night at 5:30 for a soup super and conversation with 2 representatives from the Police Crisis Team. This is part of a study we're having how the church can support families dealing with mential illness. Or, come visit the lovely rain gardens we built last fall. Our grounds are a wonderful place to meditate or just enjoy the beauty of creation. We're at 2828 SE Stephens, south of Hawthorne I think around 5 or 6 blocks. You can visit our website below. The Lord is Risen! Easter Blessings - Kate Belt"
13. Chuch M. sent this e-mail: "I really enjoyed your piece on Easter Sunday. I grew up in an agnostic home where Easter was for "Easter Birds" who attended church only on Easter. I, however, ended up attending a Lutheran church motivated by free camping and blond girls, then went on to graduate from PLU along with my bride. Then I slowly drifted away into graduate school, law school and no church attendance. We moved to PDX three years ago and ended up attending Augustana Lutheran Church in NE. It is unlike any Lutheran church encountered in my journey. It is welcoming, eclectic and more universal than most Lutheran experiences. George Mitchell, who accompanies Diane Ross and three other great Jazz musicians play at a free form service in the evening. We Oregonians love our weekends, and often (but not too often), mine concludes with a trip down the street to worship. ..."
Hi folks, Susan here. Happy Sunday -- Below are a few comments that came directly to me via email and voice mail:
1. Christopher Warren: I'm always amazed that, when hospital issues are brought up, no one brings up tort reform. That seems to be some sort of straw man that the right wingers bring up. Tort reform would never help the 100,000 people who are killed every year by medical mistakes. ...."
2. Paula F. of Parkdale sent this e-mail: "Very powerful story re hospital safety and errors! This is an important issue, and your article is valuable indeed. I hope at some point you and the Oregonian can point out what "bundled payments" to hospitals, and other modes of supposed quality control and waste-cutting could do to attempts to improve patient/hospital safety."
3. Cathy K. of Portland sent this e-mail: "I read your commentary in the Sunday paper. It really hit home with me. In Feb of 2006, I fell 15-20 ft from the 2nd story off a ladder. I was taken to Emanual Hospital as it is a trama center. I was considered a trama patient as I fell more then 10 ft. I blew out my right heel and has a burst vertabrae. They sent me home after a 1 wk stay. One week ater I returned to see my doctors for a checkup. They immediately put me back in the hospital. I didn't find out
till about 2 wks later that I had contacted the staph infection that is called MRSA, which is the really bad infection. I also didn't know that they were afraid they would not be able to save my foot. This info was relayed to me by a nurse that happened to mention it to me at a later time. I was totally in shock. How do you prepare yourself for something like that?"
Cathy continued: "I was in the hospital about 6 wks. I quit counting the surgeries after # 13... I had 2 surgeries in one day due to the MRSA staph infection. I was sent home with a wound vac attached to my foot that I lived with till the end of May. In the end....they were successful in saving my foot. Total cost....$200,000.00 total. ... I am very grateful for the happy ending but wasn't happy to find out I caught such an awful infection while in the hospital where you would think something like that wouldn't happen. I give kudos to my 2 main doctors. I am happy to hear the hospitals are successful for the new procedures to cut down on people getting any type of sickness while in the hospital."
Hi folks, me again. Here are two emails that really stood out today.
1. A woman named Linda sent this e-mail: "... As I'm sure you are aware, searching for rational explanation to the anti-abortion laws in this nation is a futile exercise. All the examples you cited serve only one actual purpose: to increase the chances that a woman will be intimidated, scared, or simply worn down enough to decide not to seek a medical abortion. ... Although I consider myself a seasoned and experienced pro-choice advocate, I have to admit, I was surprised, and then shocked and outraged, to learn that, in five and maybe soon six states, a trained medical professional is required to provide patently and unquestioningly dishonest information to a patient that is designed to corrupt the patient's ability to make an informed decision about whether to undergo an important medical procedure. ..."
2. A reader named Constance sent this e-mail: "Women are not basically impulsive, deceitful and ignorant, but I like pro-life legislation. Laws could help women in crisis pregnancies just as laws help achieve equal opportunity in sports, education and employment. Until the family, school, work and military are truly egalitarian, the less-powerful citizens need legal protection."
Constance continued: "Women make abortion decisions "privately?" No: they are pressured to abort by husbands, boyfriends, pimps, parents, employers, college administrators, genetic counselors, and total strangers if the pregnancy would inconvenience or embarrass them. Some women are harassed to terminate "excess" children beyond the "allowed" two. Some women abort, threatened with school expulsion if they choose to remain pregnant. Student athletes are expected to terminate pregnancies or lose their scholarship... perfectly legal! Pregnant women are among the most likely to be abused by a partner, but abortion clinics aren't required to screen for duress/threats. ... I am one of thousands of non-right-wing pro-lifers, such as Nat Hentoff and the members of Democrats For Life of America. Feminist history shows that, UNLIKE eugenics activist Margaret Sanger, pro-life advocates included Elizabeth Cady Stanton and, yes, Susan B. Anthony."
Hi folks, Susan here. Happy Sunday. Thanks to everyone for checking in, as always. Below are a few of the voice mails I found on my phone this afternoon.
1. An older-sounding woman left this voice mail: "Susan how dare you defend the killing of the unborn? How could you buy into the barbaric scan of disregarding the right to life of the human in the womb? What arrogance to flaunt the natural law, the right to life. You are pathetic in your thinking. Shame on you! No, I will not leave my name! You are not worth it!"
2. A man named Pete C. left this voice mail: "Thank you. You really nailed it.We were at a dinner party last night and I was sharing with the other guests that when my father died in 1973, my mother was responsible to pay off all of his credit cards. But because she was a widow, and a woman, she was not allowed to have any credit cards transferred into her name. They just didn't do things like that,for the reasons you stated here in these anti-abortion campaigns. Thank you for picking up where other people left off and calling it like it is. Thanks again."
3. A man named Kim left this voice mail: "I take exception with part of your article. I don't care if you have an abortion or not, I just don't think you should wait past 20 weeks. If you waited that long, then you need to wait, and turn it over to someone who wants a child and can't have one. As far as rape goes, if you think you've been raped, then you need to be checked for evidence and then have a D&C and get it done with. ... If you don't, then you're basically taking a chance, Five months is just too long."
* Note to Kim from Susan: According to the Guttmacher Institute, about 1.5 percent of abortions are performed after 20 weeks. I haven't seen data on what proportion of those abortions are related to medical problems, but I do know that doctors typically recommend a comprehensive ultrasound at right around 19-20 weeks. This ultrasound can reveal serious fetal abnormalities, including ones that point to a likely stillbirth. I think the whole point of moving the abortion cutoff from 27 weeks, to 24 weeks, to 20 weeks is as important for its symbolic power as for its actual impact on the abortion rate: It moves the state's power to intervene closer to conception, rather than closer to viability.
4. A man who didn't leave his name left this voice mail: "I'm glad you wrote it. You know, I personally think abortion is murder, but I still think we need to have laws allowing women to have abortions. ..."
5. A man named Keith W. left this voice mail: "Great article. We've got a problem in this world and we're taking the rights of women away again rather than making things equal. Pretty soon we'll be taking away the rights of women to vote, the way things are going. Women should have the right to choose, and that's it."
6. A man named Gary B. from Wood Village left this voice mail: "Another thing the anti-abortion laws do is paint a portrait of women who don't mind killing unborn children. So there's another thing to add to your list."
Hi folks, me again. Here is a second batch of e-mails and voice mails that you might enjoy reading. Quite a healthy range of opinions in Oregon:
1. A reader named Christopher W. left this voice mail: "I join you in your support of Planned Parenthood. I've had a lot of women in my life (I'm 63) who've gotten services from Planned Parenthood and as you most fervently point out, it's an issue of health-care access. But I take objection to any journalist joining the right-wing meme and framing our financial situation as having anything to do with Social Security whatsoever. That's a Pete Peterson canard ... ."
2. A reader named Beverly Ann sent this e-mail: "Surely you know, deep down, that it's a ridiculous statement to say that the defunding of Planned Parenthood by Congress is "the kind of spite that will lead to more unwanted pregnancies and more abortions in Oregon." Planned Parenthood doesn't have or teach or provide the only means in all the earth to prevent pregnancy! Not only are there other options, but common sense tells me that even the poor and the uneducated have God-given knowledge as to how to keep from producing unwanted children! Furthermore, abortion is NOT family planning! That's an outrageous way to think. I just do not believe for one minute that Planned Parenthood is the only place to get counseling about contraception and to get tested for diseases and cancer. I have learned that mammograms are not offered by Planned Parenthood."
Beverly continued: "As far as Planned Parenthood being "targeted," what about Pregnancy Resource Centers? They don't receive tax dollars and yet they are constantly being targeted and harassed simply because they want to save babies, and by the way, don't they offer "counseling?" Of course they do. Let Planned Parenthood fund themselves. I'm sure there are plenty of people, just like you who believe they are a necessity and would gladly donate to them, and they could also charge a fee from those who have the means to pay. To ask me and countless others who believe as I do to give to an organization that willfully kills the unborn is immoral because abortion is immoral. This has become a nation where we call evil good and good evil. Judgment day is coming."
3. A woman who didn't leave her name left this voice mail: "Susan, I absolutely loved your editorial. I've been meaning to write something as a reader but I've been sick. My daughter uses Planned Parenthood. She lives in Texas and has epilepsy, and she can't get insurance. If it weren't for Planned Parenthood, I don't know what she would do. She is able to get a type of birth control that doesn't aggravate her epilepsy, like some of the medication does. Anyway, thank you. ... "
4. A woman named Sally left this voice mail: "Thanks for your good, down to earth and sensible article about Planned Parenthood."
5. Susie M. from Portland sent this e-mail: "I really appreciated your words in today's paper regarding Planned Parenthood and the services they provide. As a teenager in conservative Salt Lake City, I was extremely grateful for the existence of Planned Parenthood. I have since supported Planned Parenthood financially, because I believe that they provide extremely important health services. I hope that your words will have a positive and even educational effect on those who have been brainwashed by fear and stigma."
Hi folks, Susan here. Happy Sunday. Below are a few of the emails and voice mails that came straight to me this morning:
1. A man who didn't leave his name left this voice mail: "Susan, I'm reading your article. I think Planned Parenthood is very much needed. I've always supported it. I see these teenage girls having these babies, and they're not much older than the babies, and no education, no financial support. ... And then they become a burden to the taxpayers. How come we don't get better? Guys are guys, and they're always going to want to have sex. The girls have to resist that temptation. ... We're not getting any better, I mean, what is wrong? They're not bad girls, they just make mistakes. We were having sex when I was a teenager in the 1950s! The same thing was then. Then they have an unwanted baby, then they're abused, then they have a bad boyfriend who abuses them, and he can't get a job. We need Planned Parenthood and we need it everywhere."
2. Joan Q. sent this e-mail: "Thanks for writing about the efforts to cut federal funding from Planned Parenthood. It should got a long way to help people understand the services the group offers. When you mentioned that Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in the country I thought: well yes but largest only because it isn't provided by all those individuals and centers who used to do it, but who now are too frightened of death threats to continue doing it. I'm merely a citizen unassociated with the group, who hasn't used the services but did help escort at the Lovejoy Clinic many years ago. It's really important these days that real facts and information get printed as you have done here."
3. A woman who didn't leave her name left this voice mail: "I'd like to comment on your item in The Oregonian. I think what they are doing to that organization is almost criminal. Maybe the companies that make Viagra and Cialis should have to donate half of their profits to Planned Parenthood. That would fund them quite well. Thank you, goodbye."
Hi folks, Susan here. Thanks as always for checking in. Below is a sampler of some of the comments that came directly to me via e-mail or voice mail. Feel free to leave your own comments as well.
1. Steve Z left this voice mail: "By inference, you seem to be saying that abusers are creeps. They're not creeps. They're criminals. They're not just men, either. And it's not just women who are sexually abused. I don't think you reported this in an unbiased way. Thank you."
2. Kristin R. left this voice mail: "I wanted you to know how appalled I was by your editorial. By what I would consider thoughtless and callous opinion, I can assume that no one in your family has ever been sexually abused. So I don't think anyone who hasn't been in that situation has any right to have an opinion about anything about this, or how long someone should have. I'm an abuse survivor. I tried to prosecute my mom's husband and was kind of coerced into dropping charges, so I never had any closure. It was just really discouraging. That's my message to you."
3. A woman who didn't leave her name left this voice mail: "Just read your article this morning. It's beautifully written and I couldn't agree with you more. I don't in any way condone what Goldschmidt did, but it seems like this bill is promoted by people who just want to go after him every way possible...."
4. A woman named Tiffany sent this email: "Thank you so much for reminding readers about the importance of basic constitutional safeguards in criminal prosecutions. In my experience, the constitution is like a good lawyer--- neither is appreciated until it is needed. Also in my experience, no state that has expanded these statutes of limitations has ever been able to ratchet them back, no matter the consequences. I am not sure that the legislature understands that Rep. Hunt's bill requires them to make not only a grave decision, but an irrevocable one."
Tiffany continued: "When I left my corporate civil practice to become a criminal lawyer, I considered applying to the DA's office, but making a case for fair play and fundamental protections for the accused seemed like the more challenging and under-served role (I was right). Thank you so much for reminding readers of the importance of such fundamental but sometimes undervalued constitutional guarantees. I'm sure you'll catch hell for it, so just consider it a well-earned badge of honor! Thanks again for your courage."
5. Randy M sent this email" "Once again I find myself thanking you for a excellent piece of writing that balances the discussion. I hate to say this because I can feel the pain of the people who testified - but is this really a business development undertaking of the legal industry or a way to help victims?"
6. A reader with the initials PDT sent this e-mail: "THANK GOD, am NOT a rape or abuse victim, but my earliest childhood recollection is from 3 years old when I went to the hospital for a tonsillectomy. I was SO TRAUMATIZED by the event, that I remember it like it was YESTERDAY! That's why it's SO INSULTING to hear good people (like you!) try to reason away something as egregious as continued sexual abuse--made more horrifying at the hands of a trusted caretaker(!!!)---or defense attorneys who [try to] tarnish the rep of the victim, or those who claim that people's memories are too cloudy or fuzzy to remember: Oh, how I DISAGREE!!! Knowing CRIMINALS like Neil Goldschmidt escaped prosecution then went on to live a life of leisure and privilege while the woman he continued to abuse & STALK(!!) is now deceased, makes my blood boil!"
Hiya Jack -- Well, you excerpted the most positive parts of an editorial that endorsed...the other guy! I believe the headline was, "1st District voters should start anew with Rob Cornilles." You are right that the endorsement didn't trash Wu, and that it made some effort to speak fairly about Wu's contributions, even as it strongly favored the other guy.
Oregonian news reporters have written extensively and (in my opinion) fairly about Wu over the years, including the good, the bad and the ugly. They uncovered the story about the problem at Stanford, they reported about his near-catatonic state in Congress during the Medicare vote when it happened, and they've written many profiles that touched on his overarching strengths and weaknesses as a leader. As for the editorial side, we started endorsing Wu's opponents when it became clear that Wu's effectiveness was limited, and continued to do so at every plausible opportunity. One example is in 2004, when we endorsed Republican Goli Ameri. (We said that we agreed with Wu on many issues, including schools, the environment and abortion rights, but that voters and Oregon's high-tech community sorely needed a better Congress member.)
People have a lot of different reactions to The Oregonian's coverage. Some people read it and think we are engaging in a coverup: They think we should bring up Wu's problems more frequently and loudly. Other people read the same coverage and perceive a personal vendetta against the Congress member. Either way, people need to come to their own conclusions about whether Wu is the best person to represent Oregon in Congress. So: Is he? Should Oregon re-elect him in 2012?
Hi Jack -- Thanks for your comments. I hear where you're coming from. This column did explicitly say that good people run for office in Oregon, and it singled out school boards and the state Legislature as examples. It also said that there are many excellent candidates for Wu's job, including state legislators. I agree with you about Rob Cornilles. Scott Bruun was a very good candidate, too. (And I really do think the state Legislature is full of good lawmakers and getting better every year.)
But I stand by the central point, which is a variation on a few bad apples spoiling the barrel. It dismays me to see the Democratic party standing behind Wu year after year (and hiding his problems right before an election) when there are so many other good people -- Ds and Rs alike -- who could do the job. And I wish all voters would be more willing to give challengers a fair shot, rather than automatically voting for the more familiar name (or assuming that the candidate who shares their party identification is the more qualified choice).
Hi folks, Susan here. Happy Sunday. Below are a few comments that readers sent directly to me via e-mail or voice mail:
1. A woman who didn't leave her name left this voice mail: "The Oregon I grew up in was feisty, it was quirky, it would have stood up and done something. The people who were our leaders were men and women who stood up and did things. They didn't sit around and dither for hours and days and weeks and months. People didn't care as much about what other people thought about them, and I mean that in a good way. They stood up for their decisions, even when it made people unhappy.
"With the influx of the new creatives, we have become more and more passive. We don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, anywhere, anytime, any day. And consequently, we get what we deserve. We don't celebrate true bravery. We don't celebrate people taking a stand. We celebrate people who talk in such generalities that we don't know what the hell they're saying. ... Why should candidates stand up against what seems to be an unbeatable Democratic party majority that says, you know what, the party is more important than anything else. More important than Mr. Wu (which is sad, because he needs help), and more important than the citizens of his district. I'm sad about what happened, but we got exactly what we deserve."
2. A man who didn't leave his name left this voice mail: "I think Brad Avakian would be a good one to replace Congressman Wu. .... "
3. A woman who didn't leave her name left this voice mail: "I just wanted to comment on your use of the word "crazy" in today's editorial. I think it's inappropriate, and I think you could use other adjectives to describe "good crazy" and the other side of the coin would be "bad crazy," which I would associate with true mental illness. I'd encourage you to contact NAMI, which is the National Alliance on Mental Illness, and look at terminology that is more appropriate."
(Quick response from Susan: Thanks for making that point. I said in the second paragraph that I didn't mean crazy as a synonym for mental illness; I meant is as a way to describe certain qualities that can make a good (or bad) politician. I described "good-crazy" qualities as obsessive attention to detail, dogged optimism, supreme personal confidence, etc. I'd describe "bad crazy" qualities as an unhealthy need for the spotlight, or ambition that trumps all other concerns, etc. But I understand that "crazy" can be an indelicate word and I apologize if it came across as insensitive. )
4. A man who didn't leave his name left this voice mail: "Boy you guys just don't like David at all. That's just apparent. But given the fools that the Republicans have nominated for offices, David's better than any one of them. So you might want to rethink what the candidate problem is. Maybe if the (expletive expletive) Republicans weren't such (expletive), then we could work together."
5. A reader named Randy sent this e-mail: "I find few people I could share this with - but given the stories of HOW LONG ago all their concerns for Rep. Wu go - I find it fully incredulous that these issues with Wu (the ones that are being surfaced - all - are not new) were not vetted in April prior to the primary or November prior to the general election for the public. Maybe I am a conspiracy theorist but this smells - and the fragrance is someone within the Democratic party (or maybe labor support) deciding it is time to move Wu. That my friend is the real story here. If mental health stays as the superficial reason - that is WRONG. Using the Watergate "Deep Throat directive" - FOLLOW THE MONEY....."
6. A reader named Lisa from Dundee sent this e-mail: "I agree that we do lack credible candidates, but that was not the case this last time. Rob Cornilles was plenty credible, but Multnomah County's vote trumps the rest of the state. Those of us in the rest of the state would love to dump the echo chamber that is multnomah county. You can't get get through to those voters - they have their hands over their ears, yelling lalalalalalalalala at every election.
"Here's the obvious question no one appears to be asking: If political insiders all knew about Wu, why didn't we? Do we have no reporters watching and listening to our delegation? Is there no one with sources inside the political machine and if not, why not? Is journalism all about just reporting what so-and-so said? I don't remember any coverage until this week of Wu sitting on the floor at the Capitol in a catatonic state. Did I miss it somehow? Or did it simply not get reported? Did journalists know and decide to protect Wu? What happens to democracy in the absence of a responsible fourth estate? Just askin' the question."
Quick response from Susan: Hi Lisa -- I agree with you about Rob. He was a good candidate. As to your second point, The Oregonian's news reporters have covered Wu's strengths and weaknesses extensively, and they broke the story about Wu and the apparent attack at Stanford. (And yep, we even wrote about the odd catatonic state). The Oregonian's editorial board has endorsed Wu's opponents at every plausible opportunity.
7. A reader who identified himself as a former Oregon mayor sent this e-mail (I'm leaving out his personal identifiers): "I read your "crazy to run" article in today's paper. I served *** terms as Mayor of ****. In my opinion, the worst thing (or at least one of the worst) a politician can do is to believe that they "have a few more things to finish before they leave". I knew that our community had many many bright, intelligent and capable people who were just as passionate as I was about **** so I decided not to run for a ** term (I was appointed to finish one term and was elected *** more times). We needed new ideas viewed from a different perspective. We needed the next right answer. I am proud of the things we accomplished in the time I was allowed to serve by the citizens. I apologize for rambling! The reason I wrote to you was to tell you how much I enjoyed your article and that I agree with you. In my opinion you captured the current problem facing the future of political leadership in Oregon. Keep writing!"
Hi folks, Susan here. "Thanks for writing." (No, really, I mean it!) Below are a few comments that came directly to me today:
1. Larry M. wrote in an e-mail: "Nice article, though you can feel free to call me a moron, idiot---with spell checker---or calling a spade one of those ______shovels. We only kick a brothers butt for his own enlightenment and encouragement."
2. Sherry W. wrote in an e-mail: "I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed your article in today's newspaper. It is good to know that others practice self-censorship most of the time, and consider it to be (un)common civility. We all need to be a little kinder."
3. Susan J. wrote in an e-mail: "Thank you for your article on civility. I too think it is more common than not. Just last evening my husband and I were discussing "being nice." I pointed out that it is an effort and we shouldn't take that effort for granted, that one is not naturally nice but rather thoughtfully nice. I think that continued practice creates a mindset of courtesy and generosity first which is helpful in day to day encounters and that, fortunately, many people have incorporated that practice into their lives. But it is a discipline and a practice and we should all congratulate ourselves and others for continuing in the face of provocation and despite rumors that such efforts are outmoded. The Oregonian has had several stories of kindness and creativity this week. I read them with great pleasure. Thank you to your organization.:"
Hi Marcia -- Thanks for your note. I've done an update or two in the comment section of the blog post about Elizabeth's accident, but that is easily missed.
Elizabeth moved to an inpatient rehabilitation center in Portland a few days ago, after being hospitalized for about two weeks. Full recovery is expected to take weeks or longer, but she is getting a little better every day. There is not much new to report beyond that.
I know a lot of readers feel a personal connection with her and want to know how she's doing. It is difficult to find a good balance between letting readers know how she's doing and protecting her medical privacy. I hope this update helps, and I hope Elizabeth will be writing about her experience firsthand by spring. Until then, please keep her in your thoughts. She's a fantastic person.
Thanks for asking. She is officially "out of the woods" now and expected to leave the hospital this week to begin inpatient rehabilitation in Portland. Full recovery could take weeks or longer, but we're so pleased to see her on her way after two weeks in the hospital.
Hi folks, Susan here. Some of you asked questions about Elizabeth's insurance situation. She does have health insurance. (She also wears a helmet when skiing.) However, very serious accidents still create significant out-of-pocket medical expenses, even for people with insurance. That's what the fund is for -- to help reduce the financial strain and keep the focus on recovery. It was set up by former colleagues at The Columbian newspaper, where she worked for about a decade and where she maintains close ties.
There are a lot of people in the newspaper industry rooting for her, and certainly a lot of readers are, too.
But please, let's not get sidetracked by insurance talk. Thanks so much to everyone for keeping your comments focused on sending positive messages to Elizabeth and her family. I know for a fact that she will read them and be heartened by them.
Elizabeth -- Everyone here at The Oregonian is wishing you well and hoping for a speedy recovery. Take care of yourself.
Hi z97221 -- The district plans to rebuild East Sylvan on the West Sylvan campus. This would essentially be the first phase of a West Sylvan remodel. The ultimate goal is to house all middle schoolers on the same campus, rather than sixth graders and their teachers exiled at the current east campus.
By the way, would you mind emailing me or faxing a copy of the Lincoln High School foundation letter? I'd love to see it. My email is firstname.lastname@example.com and fax is (503) 294-4193. :)
Hi folks - Thanks to those of you with thoughtful remarks. Comments that blame or insult the deceased are totally unacceptable. Please reel it in or go elsewhere.
Nativegal -- Fair point. However, I do think the quality of public schools in inextricably linked to the state's economic health and its tax revenue. If more students did better in school, graduated, went on to college, etc., rather than floundering and dropping out, we'd have a better educated workforce that is more attractive to well-paying companies, leading to higher per capita income, more state revenue, and so on.
Also, I think better school leadership leads to better morale and job performance. Any time PPS can figure out how to spend money more efficiently, that frees up more money to spend on the *other* things parents care about: smaller class sizes, art, music, PE, longer school year (all things in short supply right now in Oregon). Of course, "eliminating waste" won't solve Oregon's budget problems, which are deep and structural. (Also, per-student spending in Oregon is around the national average or slightly below, so it's not like schools are swimming in money.) But every little bit of efficiency helps.
I'm curious, nativegal -- what specific topics would feel less varnishy and more boaty to you?


text:
To see Trent's contest video and cast a vote, click here.
Trent also posts other videos online to show off his mascot personality, see them here and here.
Sam Houston State University graduate Trent Coots is a finalist in the Houston Astros search for a new mascot.
The theater major played Sammy the Bearkat during his time at SHSU. After graduating, he went on to work for the Houston Comets and Houston Dynamo.
Coots is now competing to be the next mascot of the Houston Astros. After beating 50 people from across the country, he is now one of four who made it to the finals.
Voting is done online and ends October 17th.
See Trent's interview in the player.
Contestants submit videos online for voters to watch, then cast votes for their favorites.
To comment, the following rules must be followed:
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content, but the station is under no legal obligation to do so.
If you believe a comment violates the above rules, please use the Flagging Tool to alert a Moderator.
Flagging does not guarantee removal.
Multiple violations may result in account suspension.
Decisions to suspend or unsuspend accounts are made by Station Moderators.
Questions may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.com. Please provide detailed information.


text:
Information for Faculty and Staff
The Office of the Dean of Students was established to provide an entry point for students who need assistance solving problems. To that end, we want to work in cooperation with you and become a solution-center for students as they experience difficulties.
One significant way we can work together is in identifying and providing help to students in distress. You're often the frontline for identifying these students, and we want to work with you to find a successful resolution for everyone.
Providing a safety net for our students
As you begin to create your syllabi we recommend that you include one of the following examples of information:
Syllabi Insert #1:
If you are experiencing undue personal or academic stress at any time during the semester or need to talk with someone about a personal problem or situation, I encourage you to seek support as soon as possible. I am available to talk with you about stresses related to your work in my class. Additionally, I can assist you in reaching out to any one of a wide range of campus resources, including:
1. Dean of Students Office: 607-777-2804
2. Decker Student Health Services Center: 607-777-2221
3. University Police: On campus emergency, 911
4. University Counseling Center: 607-777-2772
5. Interpersonal Violence Prevention: 607-777-3062
6. Harpur Advising: 607-777-6305
7. Office of International Student & Scholar Services:607-777-2510
Syllabi Insert #2:
Diminished mental health, including significant stress, mood changes, excessive worry, or problems with eating and/or sleeping can interfere with optimal academic performance. The source of symptoms might be largely related to your course work; if so, I invite you to speak with me (or your other professors) directly. However, problems with relationships, family worries, loss, or a personal struggle or crisis can also contribute to decreased academic performance, and may require additional professional support. Binghamton University provides a variety of support resources: the Dean of Students Office and University Counseling Center offer coaching on ways to reduce the impact to your grades. Both of these resources can help you manage personal challenges that impact your well-being or ability to thrive at Binghamton University. Accessing them, especially early on, as symptoms develop, can help support your academic success as a University student.
In the event I feel you could benefit from such support, I will express my concerns (and the reasons for them) to you and remind you of our resources. While I do not need to know the details of what is going on for you, your ability to share some of your situation with me will help me connect you with the appropriate support.
Additionally, if you are concerned that a student is exhibiting personality or behavioral changes such as a lack of interest or engagement with others or signs of aggression, contacting the Student of Concern Committee (SOC) would be a great first step and can:
- Help to coordinate the University response to students who demonstrate violence, threats to self or others, or are significantly disruptive.
- Develop action plans intended to support student and community safety, prevent violence, support student development and maintain a campus environment conducive to learning.
- Consult with faculty, staff and students involved in or affected by a student's behavior, and other individuals as appropriate.
The committee's goal is to foster early identification of concerns about students. Early review of problematic situations can reduce the impact to a student and/or the classroom, social or living environment.
To speak with a member of the Students of Concern Committee, contact the Dean of Students Office at 607-777-2804 or firstname.lastname@example.com.
If unsure about bringing a person to the attention of the SOC Committee, contact the case manager, Beth Riley, for more information at firstname.lastname@example.com or 777-2804.
When consulting with the case manager only those with a need-to-know will be brought into the circle of information. Consulting with the case manager does not mean the student of concern's situation is automatically brought to the SOC Committee.
Providing help for distressed students
If you suspect you're dealing with a distressed student, we recommend taking action at the first sign of a problem. Our end goal, of course, is to allow for the learning process to continue.
Our office can assist by:
- helping to centralize information about students of concern; if the individual causes a problem in a classroom, chances are he/she is having problems in other places on campus
- providing advice about how to approach a student of concern; we work with many academic and Student Affairs offices that will provide assistance to you and the student
- coordinating disciplinary action and/or mental health assistance for the student in question if there is a need
Signs to help identify a distressed student
- the once organized, timely and cooperative student doesn't seem to be that way now
- the student may be unusually quiet or absent
- the student may not communicate (doesn't talk or do assignments as needed, or appropriately)
- the student's demeanor or appearance may change
- the student may be quietly distressed – perhaps depressed or forlorn; these students may take longer to notice than angry, belligerent or disorganized students
- the student may be angry, belligerent or disorganized; we always recommend that behavior be addressed first and these students should be confronted regarding their behavior
Note: Allow the student to disclose what is distressing him/her. If others have information, the Office of the Dean of Students can help collect the information, as appropriate, in a case conference format.
Signs to help identify a disruptive student
- the student writes outrageously violent stories and doesn't want constructive – or any – feedback
- the student interrupts and curses at random times, but doesn't want to talk to the professor
- the student intimidates the professor and others
- the student stalks another person
The University Counseling Center is an important resource when dealing with distressed or disruptive students. For
specific advice and actions you can take, visit the counseling center's webpage for faculty, which also includes links to these helpful guides: Students in Distress: The Faculty Role (.pdf 204.3kb), Responding to Disruptive Behavior in the Classroom (.pdf 200.3kb) and Responding to Disturbing Content (.pdf 193.5kb).