text:
HTML: The Definitive Guide, Second Edition
Authors: Chuck Musciano and Bill Kennedy
Publisher: O'Reilly and Associates
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com
URL: http://www.oreilly.com/
Price: $32.95 US
Reviewer: Eric S. Raymond
Given the number of HTML books available, it takes something close to hubris to title a book HTML: The Definitive Guide. When O'Reilly sent me the manuscript of the first edition for review over a year ago, I was skeptical—but that first edition earned its title by presenting the best reference material I have ever seen on HTML. This second edition is a worthy follow-up.
The authors methodically walk you through every HTML feature in HTML 3.2, Netscape's extensions and Internet Explorer's extensions. They even cover such recondite topics as cascading style sheets. A handy reference appendix lists all the world's tags.
What is really outstanding about this book is the careful attention to HTML portability issues. Browser-specific tags and tag attributes are prominently marked. Charts like the summary of content-based tags on page 73, which tell you exactly how the tags will render under Netscape, Internet Explorer and Lynx, are alone worth the price of the book. And while non-portable constructions are carefully documented, the book is full of good advice about making your pages browser-independent.
Not only is this a definitive guide, it may be the only HTML book you'll ever need—at least, until the authors put out the next edition covering HTML 4.0.
Geek Guides
Practical (and free!) books for the most technical people on the planet.
- NEW: Get in the Fast Lane with NVMe
- NEW: Take Control of Growing Redis NoSQL Server Clusters
- Linux in the Time of Malware
- Apache Web Servers and SSL Encryption
- Build a Private Cloud for Less Than $10,000!
Plus many more.
Trending Topics
|One Port to Rule Them All!
|Jul 06, 2015
|Privacy Is Personal
|Jul 02, 2015
|July 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: Mobile
|Jul 01, 2015
|July 2015 Video Preview
|Jul 01, 2015
|PHP for Non-Developers
|Jun 30, 2015
|A Code Boot Camp for Underprivileged Kids
|Jun 30, 2015
- One Port to Rule Them All!
- Privacy Is Personal
- PHP for Non-Developers
- Secure Server Deployments in Hostile Territory
- Linux Kernel 4.1 Released
- Django Templates
- July 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: Mobile
- A Code Boot Camp for Underprivileged Kids
- Practical Books for the Most Technical People on the Planet
- The AtoMiC Toolkit!


text:
A framework for high quality in post graduate training has been defined by the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME). The objective of this paper is to perform a systematic review of reviews to find current evidence regarding aspects of quality of post graduate training and to organise the results following the 9 areas of the WFME framework.
The systematic literature review was conducted in 2009 in Medline Ovid, EMBASE, ERIC and RDRB databases from 1995 onward. The reviews were selected by two independent researchers and a quality appraisal was based on the SIGN tool.
31 reviews met inclusion criteria. The majority of the reviews provided information about the training process (WFME area 2), the assessment of trainees (WFME area 3) and the trainees (WFME area 4). One review covered the area 8 'governance and administration'. No review was found in relation to the mission and outcomes, the evaluation of the training process and the continuous renewal (respectively areas 1, 7 and 9 of the WFME framework).
The majority of the reviews provided information about the training process, the assessment of trainees and the trainees. Indicators used for quality assessment purposes of post graduate training should be based on this evidence but further research is needed for some areas in particular to assess the quality of the training process.
The debate on quality improvement in post graduate medical education (PME) is ongoing in many countries [1]. In the UK, the Post graduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) developed generic quality standards of training in September 2009 [2]. In the U.S., the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) is a private professional organisation and nowadays responsible for the accreditation of more than 8500 residency and fellowship programs [3]. Other countries, for instance the Netherlands and Canada also developed quality frameworks in PME [4,5].
An international framework for quality of PME has been proposed by the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME, a non-governmental organization related to the World Health Organization). Global Standards for the undergraduate, post graduate and continuing medical education were developed by three international task forces with a broad representation of experts in medical education from all six WHO/WFME Regions [6]. One of these frameworks aims to introduce a generic and comprehensive approach to quality of PME, providing internationally accepted standards and national or even regional recognition of programs [6].
In the framework above many quality indicators and rankings are used for assessing the quality of PME. However they are based on expert consensus and a further interesting step is to know to what extent they are supported by the evidence: the concrete question is to know if the quality found for each area has an impact on the training outcomes e.g. physicians' competencies and ultimately, quality of care [7]. To date, only few studies comprehensively explored the literature of the quality of post graduate medical education [8].
A mapping of the best evidence underlying the WFME framework is an ambitious work. In general, individual studies are biased by local factors and this limits generalising the findings. Therefore systematic reviews have an important role in summarizing and synthesizing evidence in medical education on a wider scale [9]. The objective of this review is to identify, appraise the quality and synthesize the best systematic reviews on post graduate medical education using the WFME standards as a blueprint (Figure 1).
Figure 1. WFME areas and sub-areas.
The systematic literature search was performed from 1995 onwards, using the following data sources: Medline Ovid (April 23, 2009), Embase (Excerpta Medica Database until June 9, 2009), ERIC (Education Recources Information Center) database until July 30, 2009) and RDRB (Research and Development Resource Base database until August 1, 2009) [10,11]. The review included publications in English, French and Dutch.
A complementary manual search was performed in five core Journals (The Lancet, JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, Annals of Internal Medicine) and five medical education journals (Academic Medicine, Medical Education, BMC Medical Education, Medical Teacher, Teaching and Learning in Medicine and Education for Health) from April 1 until October 2009.
Terms used
The Mesh terms (Medline Ovid)/Emtree terms (Embase) used were "Education, Medical, Graduate or Education" OR "Internship and Residency" OR "Family Practice/ed [Education]" as well as a combinations of terms relating to the WMFE framework items (quality, standards, legislation, education, organization, "organization and administration", *annual reports as topic, "constitution and bylaws", governing board, management audit, management information systems, mandatory programs, organizational innovation, program development, public health administration, total quality management).
In the ERIC database, the search was performed using the Thesaurus descriptors: "Graduate Medical Education" OR "Family Practice" AND keywords quality OR train* OR staff* OR standards OR organization OR legislation.
In the RDRB database, the search was performed using the key words: graduate medical education OR internship OR family practice combined with the key words: quality OR train* OR staff* OR standards OR organization OR legislation (Table 1).
Table 1. search strategy (Medline Ovid, Embase, ERIC, RDRB)
Selection procedure
A total of 3022 unique references were identified. A first selection of reviews was performed by two independent researchers (in combinations AD, RR, JW) based on title and abstract using the following inclusion criteria:
• scope: quality of training programs, training practices, trainers;
• description of national, regional or official post graduate programs;
• study design: systematic reviews
Papers were excluded using the exclusion criteria mentioned in Figure 2. The percentage of agreement between assessors was 95.1 percent.
Figure 2. Flow chart with selection process of reviews.
Disagreement was resolved in discussion by pairs of researchers. No arbitrating intervention by a third researcher was needed. Finally, 188 reviews were selected for full reading and quality appraisal. One systematic review found during the manual search completed the list.
Quality appraisal
The quality appraisal of the selected reviews was performed on the full texts by one author (RR or JW) and was checked by the first author (AD). The researchers used the frameworks of Scottish Intercollegiate Network Group (SIGN) for reviews [12]. The maximal quality score was 15. The researchers excluded 3 reviews with low scores equal to 0 or 1 on three or more items out of a total of 5 items [13-15]. One review was excluded because it used, among other studies in the core curriculum, only one study in PME [16].
After the selection procedure, 31 reviews were selected for further analysis. Figure 2 overviews the selection process. Overall, the quality of the 31 reviews (assessed using the SIGN criteria) was high (≥ 12/15) in 23 reviews and moderate (8/15-12/15) in 8 reviews. The selected reviews [17-47] evaluated 1570 primary studies carried out in the context of PME. The reviews publication dates range from 2000 to 2009, of which 9 reviews were from January 2008 until October 2009.
Many reviews did not focus solely on PME. They also analysed primary studies of undergraduate training or even the education of other health professionals, for instance high-fidelity training in undergraduate medical education and continuing medical education [18].
Most training settings were not specified (n = 12) [19-22,27,29,31,33,35,37,45,46]. Some studies mentioned them i.e. hospital settings (n = 7) [17,18,34,41-44] and outpatient settings (n = 2) [24,47]. Ten papers studied a mixed setting [23,25,26,28,30,32,36,38-40] (i.e. hospital setting and/or GP setting and/or outpatient setting and/or not specified).
Looking at the first author's affiliations, the large majority of studies came from the US (n = 19) [17,18,21,23,24,26,28-31,33,36,37,39,40,42-44,47] and the UK (n = 5) [18,26,31,44,45]. Two first authors resided in Canada [25,41], 2 in Australia [22,35], 1 in the Netherlands [38], 1 in Spain [20] and 1 in Bahrain [34]. All papers were written in English.
Practical messages
Additional file 1 gives an overview of the selected reviews: the research questions, the number of studies included in the reviews, the WFME (sub) areas that are covered, the results and the critical appraisal scores. The following paragraphs summarise their findings and highlight interesting and practical avenues to enhance the quality of PME. The following paragraphs use the term "trainee" for generic areas of PME training. The term "resident" is more specifically used when this trainee works in a clinical setting.
Additional file 1. Summary of general findings of the selected 31 reviews.
Format: DOC Size: 128KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
WFME areas under study
Most papers studied one particular area of the WFME framework while three other ones covered more than one area and/or sub-area [21,24,26]. The majority of the reviews give detailed information about the training process (WFME area 2) [17-26], the assessment of trainees (WFME area 3) [21,24,27-33] and the trainees (WFME area 4) [26,34-42]. One review covered the 'governance and administration' (WFME area 8) [24]. No review focused on the mission and outcomes, the evaluation of the training process and the continuous renewal (respectively areas 1, 7 and 9 of the WFME framework).
Importance of a core curriculum
The first step for the quality of post graduate medical training is the necessity to describe an effective "core" in-patient curriculum. That was the conclusion of Di Francesco et al. [17] who analysed the effectiveness of the training in internal medicine. They found little data on the topic and concluded that few data exist to support the quality of this training.
Conditions to facilitate learning in PME education: combination of learning approaches
Issenberg et al. found that high-fidelity simulations are educationally effective: they concluded that simulation based exercises could complement medical education in patient care settings [18]. High fidelity simulations use realistic materials and equipment to represent the task that the candidate has to perform. The authors also insist on four other conditions to facilitate learning i.e. feedback, repetitive practice, opportunities for the trainee to engage in the practice of medical skills across a wide range of difficulties and multiple learning strategies.
In the same way another review insists on the feedback to trainees as a key to success. It should be provided systematically over several years by an authoritative source. Feedback can change clinical performance, but its effects are influenced by the source and duration of the process [33].
Work in team: importance of the clinical settings
Working as a doctor implies working in teams. One systematic review has listed some principles (cfr additional file 1) to enhance the quality of teamwork among future specialists [23].
Furthermore, it is worthwhile to offer to the future hospital-based specialists adequate exposure to outpatient and ambulatory settings as an adjunct to training in inpatient settings [24]. This exposure leads to better performances on national Board examinations, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and tests of clinical reasoning. Another review estimates that residents often lack of confidence and competence for common health issues because only 13% of the training takes place in ambulatory care [47].
Growing importance of the portfolio in post graduate medical training
A portfolio is a set of materials collected to represent a person's work and foster reflective learning. The use of a portfolio gains importance in PME training and authors also recommend it as a tool for assessment [21].
Selection and assessment of trainees: shortcomings of the academic results
The selection of trainees for PME positions remains a subjective exercise: the undergraduate grades and rankings moderately correlate with the performance during internship and residency [34]. A selection of trainees based only on previous academic results in the undergraduate curriculum poorly predicts the post graduate training.
Authors from an Australian study propose a mix of traits that could predict the success of a future candidate [35] i.e. communication skills, capacity of adaptation to the audience, empathy, understanding of the role of the nursing and supporting staffs, understanding of practice protocol.
Assessment of trainees: a call for a global approach
Most authors emphasize the need for a global assessment of the post graduate trainee. Many tools exist e.g. from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination [24], the Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise = method of evaluating residents by directly observing a history and physical examination followed by feedback) [30]. In the US, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education considers the portfolio as a corner stone to evaluate the competences. A portfolio must have a creative component that is learner driven [21].
Epstein et al. emphasizes the need for a multidimensional assessment based on the observation of trainees in real situations, on feedbacks of peers and patients and on measures of outcomes. The assessment has to target many competencies e.g. professionalism, time management, learning strategies, teamwork [29]. The strong validity of evidence has been identified for the Mini-CEX but the authors conclude that more work is needed to review the optimal mix and the psychometric characteristics of assessment formats in terms of validity and reliability [24,30].
Working hours and risk of burnout: no optimal answer
Working conditions of trainees are a matter of debate in the literature. Work hours restrictions may improve the quality of life of the trainees, but it is unclear if the improved quality of life of residents ultimately results in better patient care [26]. Some evidence shows that reducing working hours does not impair clinical training, but it may decrease overall continuity of care [48,49]. It must be noted that American (80 hour work in the ACGME framework) and European directives (a maximum of 48 hours per week since August 2009 [49]) greatly differ.
Emotional exhaustion and burnout rates in medical residents are high: authors suggest a prevalence ranging from 18% to 82% in medical residents [38]. The personal and professional consequences are potentially dramatic [39,40] but few interventions are set up to tackle the problem. Support groups and meditation-type practices have shown promising results but are sometimes hard to replicate [40]. Doctor-nurse substitution has the potential to reduce doctors workload and direct health costs. Trainees welcome these reforms but trainers show reservations [50].
Some evidence in reviews to build a post graduate training process
The reviews included in this review show that evidence in the reviews is available for training processes, assessment of trainees, and trainee processes. Course organisers, colleges and the stakeholders involved in quality of post graduate medical education should rely on this available evidence to build quality frameworks and assessments. The review suggests other pertinent criteria than the undergraduate curriculum to select the candidates for post graduate medical education. There is a need to define a core curriculum and to combine learning strategies, including simulations and high quality feedback from an authoritative source. The choice of clinical settings is crucial, in particular the opportunity to work in team and to care for common ailments seen in ambulatory practice. The papers finally provide exhaustive reviews of the available assessment instruments: however they underline the need for a better assessment of their validity and for an evolution towards a multidimensional assessment.
Some gaps in the literature have been identified e.g. on sub-areas of staffing, training settings, evaluation of training process. As an illustration the link between staff performance and training outcome and the relationship between training and service are hardly addressed in reviews. The selected reviews focus on one or several parts of the WFME framework but do not take into account their interactions.
Strengths of this systematic review
This systematic review was comprehensive, based on the most important indexed databases for medical education topics. The selection of papers relied on strict criteria and the quality of the included papers was further assessed [12]. The authors who performed this review came therefore across all challenges mentioned by Reed and colleagues for performing systematic reviews of educational interventions, i.e., finding reports of educational interventions, assessing quality of study designs, assessing the scope of interventions, assessing the evaluation of interventions, and synthesizing the results of educational interventions [9].
Limitations of this systematic review
Some limitations inherent to the methodology of this systematic review need to be addressed. An important limitation is linked to the choice of key words and search strings. The concept of quality covers a broad spectrum: the choice and combination of similar MESH and non MESH terms was difficult across all databases.
A second limitation relates to the authors' decision to focus on indexed literature only. Some publications from the grey literature have been probably missed but there is a risk to that these lack scientific rigor [1]. Another source of incomplete data source might be the decision to exclude information from reviews that focused on one specialty or one technical procedure in medicine only.
A third limitation is the questionable quality of the primary studies as reported by many authors of the systematic reviews. They noted that most primary studies relate to single institutions and that the designs of included studies were often of poor quality. (Randomised) controlled trials were seldomly included in the reviews. This means that currently the best evidence in the reviews on quality in PME relies on descriptive and cohort studies and before-and-after measurements.
The classification of papers within the appropriate areas and sub-areas was a challenge. Some misclassifications might arise from the subjective assessment of the researchers' team. In particular, some papers apply to more than one (sub) area. For instance, the paper of Carraccio [21] stressed the applicability of portfolios in assessment of trainees (area 3.1), but because of the formative applications it could also be placed in training content (area 2.3), as it represents what trainees do and reflects upon the content of their work. For reasons of clarity, these three reviews were therefore reported in two most relevant (sub) areas.
The mixed populations in the studies is finally also a possible limitation to the interpretation of the results. Often other groups than residents were included in the reviews (i.e. medical students, nurses) which makes it hard to identify evidence specific for the group of post graduate trainees. Educational needs of senior trainees are different from these of junior ones. The heterogeneity within reviews is of concern and should be identified more precisely by future reviewers.
This systematic literature review identified and analyzed the available evidence for some areas of the post graduate training. The majority of the reviews provided information about the training process, the assessment of trainees and the trainees. Indicators used for quality assessment purposes of post graduate training should be based on this evidence but further research is needed for some areas in particular to assess the quality of the training process.
Key Points of this systematic literature review
• This systematic review identified the available good quality reviews for some areas of the WFME framework: training approaches, assessment of trainees and working conditions are the areas most often reviewed;
• Useful criteria to select the candidates for post graduate medical education exist;
• There is a need to combine learning strategies: high quality feedback from an authoritative source is a key of success;
• A special attention is required for the choice of clinical settings: experiences in teams and practice in ambulatory care are essential to develop the trainee's competences;
• Many assessment tools are available but there is need for a better assessment of their validity and for an evolution towards a multidimensional assessment;
• This review identified a gap in reviewed research for some (sub) areas of the WFME framework: mission and outcomes, the evaluation of the training process and the continuous renewal.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
AD, RR and DP designed this study. AD, RR and JW selected and analysed data. AD, RR and JW drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
We thank Patrice Chalon, librarian of the Federal Knowledge Centre of Health Care of Belgium for helping to search the databases.
Funding was provided by Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre. Project 2008-27
Eindrapportage projectgroep "kwaliteitsindicatoren". College voor de Beroepen en Opleidingen in de Gezondheidszorg [http:/ / www.cbog.nl/ uploaded/ FILES/ htmlcontent/ Projecten/ Kwaliteitsindicatoren/ Eindrapportage%20projectgroep%20Kwa liteitsindicatoren_versie_2.pdf] webcite
Generic standards for specialty including GP training [http:/ / www.gmc-uk.org/ Generic_standards_for_specialty_inc luding_GP_training_Oct_2010.pdf_357 88108.pdf_39279982.pdf] webcite
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [http://www.acgme.org/] webcite
Kwaliteitsindicatoren voor medische vervolgopleidingen [http:/ / www.cbog.nl/ uploaded/ FILES/ htmlcontent/ Projecten/ Kwaliteitsindicatoren/ 100428%20-%20def%20Kwaliteitsindica toren%202e%20tranche%20zorgopleidin gen.pdf] webcite
The royal college of physicians and surgeons of Canada. The Canmeds project overview [http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/bestpractices/framework_e.pdf] webcite
Postgraduate Medical Education: WFME standards for quality improvement [http://www.wfme.org/] webcite
Davis DJ, Ringsted C: Accreditation of undergraduate and graduate medical education: how do the standards contribute to quality?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006, 11(3):305-313. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Adler G, von dem Knesebeck J, Hänle MM: Quality of undergraduate, graduate and continuing medical education.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2008, 102(4):235-243. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, Wright SM, Gozu A, Hsu EB, Beach MC, Kern D, Bass EB: Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Educational Intervention Studies.
Annals of Internal Medicine 2005, 142(12 Part 2):1080-1089. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Education Resources Information Center [http://www.eric.ed.gov/] webcite
Research and Development Resource Base [http://www.rdrb.utoronto.ca/about.php] webcite
Methodology Checklist 1: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses [http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/checklists.html] webcite
Griffith CH, Rich EC, Hillson SD, Wilson JF: Internal medicine residency training and outcomes.
J Gen Intern Med 1997, 12(6):390-396. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Lee AG, Beaver HA, Boldt HC, Olson R, Oetting TA, Abramoff M, Carter K: Teaching and assessing professionalism in ophthalmology residency training programs.
Surv Ophthalmol 2007, 52(3):300-314. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Ogrinc G, Headrick LA, Mutha S, Coleman MT, O'Donnell J, Miles PV: A framework for teaching medical students and residents about practice-based learning and improvement, synthesized from a literature review.
Acad Med 2003, 78(7):748-756. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Byrne AJ, Pugsley L, Hashem MA: Review of comparative studies of clinical skills training.
Medical Teacher 2008, 30(8):764-767. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Di Francesco L, Pistoria MJ, Auerbach AD, Nardino RJ, Holmboe ES: Internal medicine training in the inpatient setting. A review of published educational interventions.
J Gen Intern Med 2005, 20(12):1173-1180. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ: Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review.
Medical Teacher 2005, 27(1):10-28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Coomarasamy A, Khan KS: What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review.
BMJ 2004, 329(7473):1017. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Flores-Mateo G, Argimon JM: Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: a systematic review.
Carraccio C, Englander R: Evaluating competence using a portfolio: A literature review and web-based application to the ACGME competencies.
Teaching & Learning in Medicine 2004, 16(4):381-387. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Lynagh M, Burton R, Sanson-Fisher R: A systematic review of medical skills laboratory training: Where to from here?
Medical Education 2007, 41(9):879-887. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Chakraborti C, Boonyasai RT, Wright SM, Kern DE: A systematic review of teamwork training interventions in medical student and resident education.
J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23(6):846-853. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Bowen JL, Irby DM: Assessing quality and costs of education in the ambulatory setting: a review of the literature.
Acad Med 2002, 77(7):621-680. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Kennedy TJT, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard LA: Progressive independence in clinical training: a tradition worth defending?
Acad Med 2005, 80(10 Suppl):S106-111. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Fletcher KE, Underwood W, Davis SQ, Mangrulkar RS, McMahon LF Jr, Saint S: Effects of work hour reduction on residents' lives: a systematic review.
JAMA 2005, 294(9):1088-1100. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
McKinley RK, Strand J, Ward L, Gray T, Alun-Jones T, Miller H: Checklists for assessment and certification of clinical procedural skills omit essential competencies: A systematic review.
Medical Education 2008, 42(4):338-349. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Lyness JM: Measurement of the general competencies of the accreditation council for graduate medical education: a systematic review.
Acad Med 2009, 84(3):301-309. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Epstein RM, Hundert EM: Defining and assessing professional competence.
JAMA 2002, 287(2):226-235. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE: Tools for Direct Observation and Assessment of Clinical Skills of Medical Trainees: A Systematic Review.
JAMA 2009, 302(12):1316-1326. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Lynch DC, Surdyk PM, Eiser AR: Assessing professionalism: A review of the literature.
Med Teach 2004, 26(4):366-373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Hutchinson L, Aitken P, Hayes T: Are medical postgraduate certification processes valid? A systematic review of the published evidence.
Med Educ 2002, 36(1):73-91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DW: Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance*: BEME Guide No. 7.
Medical Teacher 2006, 28(2):117-128. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Hamdy H, Prasad K, Anderson B, Scherpbier A, Williams R, Zwierstra R, Cuddihy H: BEME systematic review: Predictive values of measurements obtained in medical schools and future performance in medical practice.
Medical Teacher 2006, 28(2):103-116. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Pilotto LS, Duncan GF, Anderson-Wurf J: Issues for clinicians training international medical graduates: A sytematic review.
Medical Journal of Australia 2007, 187(4):225-228. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Mitchell M, Srinivasan M, West DC, Franks P, Keenan C, Henderson M, Wilkes M: Factors affecting resident performance: development of a theoretical model and a focused literature review.
Acad Med 2005, 80(4):376-389. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Yao DC, Wright SM: The challenge of problem residents.
J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16(7):486-492. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Prins JT, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Tubben BJ, van der Heijden FMMA, van de Wiel HBM, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM: Burnout in medical residents: a review.
Med Educ 2007, 41(8):788-800. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
JAMA 2004, 292(23):2880-2889. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
McCray LW, Cronholm PF, Bogner HR, Gallo JJ, Neill RA: Resident physician burnout: is there hope?
Fam Med 2008, 40(9):626-632. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Finch SJ: Pregnancy during residency: a literature review.
Acad Med 2003, 78(4):418-428. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Boex JR, Leahy PJ: Understanding residents' work: moving beyond counting hours to assessing educational value.
Acad Med 2003, 78(9):939-944. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Post RE, Quattlebaum RG, Benich JJ: Residents-as-teachers curricula: a critical review.
Acad Med 2009, 84(3):374-380. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Dewey CM, Coverdale JH, Ismail NJ, Culberson JW, Thompson BM, Patton CS, Friedland JA: Residents-as-teachers programs in psychiatry: a systematic review.
Can J Psychiatry 2008, 53(2):77-84. PubMed Abstract
Jha V, Quinton ND, Bekker HL, Roberts TE: Strategies and interventions for the involvement of real patients in medical education: A systematic review.
Medical Education 2009, 43(1):10-20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Kilminster SM, Jolly BC: Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review.
Med Educ 2000, 34(10):827-840. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Bowen JL, Salerno SM, Chamberlain JK, Eckstrom E, Chen HL, Brandenburg S: Changing habits of practice. Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings.
J Gen Intern Med 2005, 20(12):1181-1187. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
Hutter MM, Kellogg KC, Ferguson CM, Abbott WM, Warshaw AL: The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons.
Ann Surg 2006, 243(6):864-871.
discussion 871-865PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text
European Working Time Directive [http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=706&langId=en&intPageId=205] webcite
Laurant RDM, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B: Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care.
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customersCreate your own review
Most Helpful First | Newest First
4.0 out of 5 stars (my) Review,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
I liked this book becayse there was a lot of conflict, action and it was funny. Like when Tobias said, " I feel like Britney Spears" and Marco said, "Unfortubately for me you don't look like her." I also like the book because it wasn't a hard book to understand, so you weren't confused the whole time! I like the resolution and that it didn't keep you hanging at the end.
I would have to say the best part was when Tobiaas and Marco were trying to drive the M-1 tank. Probably because it was funny. Like when Marco and Tobias were saying, "What do you mean if we can figure out how to start it? You happen to be sitting next to the to the Tank Commando master!" said Marco, "Right. Video-game expertise" said Tobias. Another funny part that I enjoyed was when they were going down the street and this guy wouldn't move so Tobias was like, "We have better quipment then he does." You can't shoot him, Tobias!" "Yeah, but he doesn't know that!"
I think the best story element was the characters. it really shows there personality and who they are, and there families. For example: " everyone was forced to move to the Hork-Bajir valley. Rachel with her mom and two sisters. Cassie with her parents. Tobias with his mom. and Jake alone. Jake turned into someone none of us knew anymore." That shared sadness for his bestfriend. Another very good written stroy element was the conflict. It explained very clearly what there mission was. " We need help, so we split. One group is in the in your face group. That creates a diversion withe the National Guard troops. That keeps them away from the Yeerk poolas long as possible. There stationed all over th city. Group two will be smaller and quiter. They will need to find the governor and convice him to help us." I think that described very well what the mission was.
5.0 out of 5 stars ABSOLUTE- Animorphs is for adults too,
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
Although this series was designed for the child to pre-teen category, it has many aspects an adult would enjoy. Look past the cover, the large print, and the age of the characters; instead look at the wonderfully crafted story line, the unforgettable trials they went through and lessons they learned by this group of teens who were thrust into a war and a battle unseen by most. The "enemy umoung us " approach. An enemy that, once taken control over their host, is indistinguishable from your own children, parents, or siblings. You can see no difference. There is a large quantity of violence which is the main reason I wouldn't recommend it to younger children.
The Animorphs now have a new enemy, there own hearts. Its slightly reminiscent of Star Wars. Turn to the darkside. The animorphs must fight without compromising there morality and ethics. But in war does it really matter? Is there such a thing as morality when lives are on the line? Do the ends justify the means? The animorphs must decdide, because the end is near.
Adults will enjoy this book. High School students. And children. The story is for humankind, to see the only way to save the human race is to unite as one. Happy reading.
5.0 out of 5 stars The Absolute,
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
Here's the deal these days: They know exactly who we are. They know exactly where we live. We've got a few secrets left, and we're gonna use them. But just know that the end is coming. And we don't know how much longer we can do this. How much longer we can fight.
What about you? Where will you be when it ends? Think about it. Think hard. Because the countdown has already begun. . . .
That is the new back for the final four Animorphs books. Because now the Animorphs and Ax have no secrets. And the Yeerks are stronger than ever. The morphing cube has recently switched hands in a previous book, and the Animorphs are now seeing life from the other side. A life of terror, where you're enemy can't be seen, and you don't know if that fly on your finger is really a fly . . . or your greatest enemy. But that's not all.
Tensions are mounting in the colony between Jake and the others, especially Cassie. No one knows how to act around their depressed leader, and a secret Cassie's hiding could destroy their trust in her forever.
Visser One has begun taking over the National Guard, and this is where #51 begins: With Marco and Tobias watching an army of tanks being brought into the city, in preparation for complete war. Thousands of army and navy members are being brought to be infested, and it's too much for the Animorphs to handle. So they take a risk, a HUGE risk. One that can cost the freedom of the human race. What if they tell the government what's happening? But worse still, what if the government already knows . . .
5.0 out of 5 stars Animorphs #51: The Absolute -- an absolutely thrilling book,
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
Marco, the other Animorphs, and Ax are weakening each day. The battles are heavier and the casualties are increasing. Sometimes there's a tiny way out. Sometimes there's nowhere to hide. But now they are definitely positive of increasing their risks -- one of them being their very secret. The Animorphs need to warn the governor of the Yeerk invasion of Earth. They don't know if she's a Controller or not, but they know that something must be done to stop the Yeerks -- no matter what. Can they take such a risk? Can they put their lives at a far greater stake then ever before? Animorphs #51: The Absolute is a thrilling addition to the series , a fantastic blast through scene after scene. Although it is not the best of the Animorphs series, it is one of the better books in this ever changing series -- recommended to all readers, it is not one to be missed and has excitement far more unique then its predececors. This is one series that keeps getting more enjoyable by tthe book -- and as the end approaches, better and better books keep coming. #51: The Absolute is one of those books, and although it is not the best it's one roller coaster ride of a book that will never fail to lose interest, unlike the action that had always been boring and predictable. K.A. Applegate knows how to put a wonderful plot into a wonderful book, and The Absolute proves it. It is an 'absolute' classic to the series. No longer will you expect the endings, and no longer will the excitement EVER dissipate.
5.0 out of 5 stars The clock is ticking - and the future of Earth is at stake.,
Rebecca Herman (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
The Animorphs and their families are living in hiding in the Hork-Bajir valley, no longer able to keep up the facade of normal lives now that their identities have been discovered by the Yeerks. Their parents are having a hard time facing the realties of wartime, and Jake, whose entire family is infested by the Yeerks, is losing his faith and his ability to lead. At the time when they need unity the most, the Animorphs are divided by petty differences. Their greatest weapon, the morphing cube, is in the hands of the enemy. And now that they have no more hope of keeping their secret, they've decided that now may be the time to turn the secret invasion into all all-out war. But by going public and revealing the truth - that Earth is under attack and the future of life as we know it is at stake - the Animorphs may be walking straight into enemy hands. If you love the Animorphs series, you won't want to miss out on this latest book. Because the end is near - and who will emerge victorious to determine the future of the Earth?
5.0 out of 5 stars Help is on the Way.............................,
Shambo (Seattle , Wa USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
Now that the yeerks have the Morphing Power,the Animorphs have a lot more problems...Everywhere they go,everytime they even try to morph,a team of morph-capable Yeerks cut them off...And now the "National Guard" has sent an army of tanks into town,but it kinda obvious for the animorphs to know that the National Guard has been infiltrated by the Yeerks,and those tanks will most likely be for rounding up hosts....But,they have an idea,What if they got the Govenor to back them up,and warn people of the Yeerk threat.....It could work,but then again,mabye not..........
i loved this book,like I aslo love almost all the Animorph books.This one is very exiting,and I loved the part where they tell the Govener that Earth is under attack......i think any Animorph fan will love this book,and i think You will like it even if You aren't really a fan of it...I also recomend the other books from the series,and any book by K.A. Applegate.......
5.0 out of 5 stars Yep, this one finally got me...,
"innle" (NSW, Australia) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
...and so much for my snark! Yep, I'm the one who complains about style, structure, length, narrative chasms - just about everything you can think of - on the other reviews. This one actually got me. I admit it.
'Kay. Can't complain about length. Very 'noisy', but that's appropriate (as it wasn't in #49). Very little Cassie, Jake, Rachel, parental units...and that's good; after #50, I think EVERYONE needs a break from that. I was happy with the Marco-and-Ax-and-Tobias Show, that's for sure.
That bit with the tanks. Bit spurious. Afterwards; Tobias has never been able to drive before...What was the deal with all those Governor-Rachel connections? Is that a hint? A plot development? A 'character insight' (God forbid)?
Wow. Maybe they saved the good ghostwriters for the end. Only three books to go (then I can not be permanently broke)...
5.0 out of 5 stars A Secret Shared�,
Clarissa (Harvey, LA Harvey) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
It turns out that Visser One is trying to gain control of the National Guard, and that means making controllers out of them. So the Animorphs have decided that, in order to stand a chance against them, they have to tell the world about the Yeerks. So they send Marco, Tobias, and Ax to try and convince the governor of the truth. But, as usual, what was supposed to be a low profile mission ends up as your not-so-average highway chase scene. Animorphs just keeps getting better as we draw closer and closer to the end. Ax even learned how to do jokes and sarcasm. But the funniest part, IMHO, was when Tobias criticized his duck morph. Lisa Harkrader ghostwrote this one and she did a great job.
4.0 out of 5 stars Countdown to the series finale,
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
My son wrote the following mini-review:
The team could not be any more surprised than when news leaks out that the National Guard has been captured by Yeerks. This book focuses primarily on the Animorphs' struggle to first ensure that the Governor is not a controller and then to protect her from the Yeerks. Ax, Marco, and Tobias risk their lives to prevent her from being infested; they are successful.
With this installment, K.A. Applegate begins the countdown to the conclusion of this popular series.
5.0 out of 5 stars EXELLENT!,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Animorphs #51: Absolute (Paperback)
In this book the Animorphs must tell the govener about the Yeerks before it's too late. Marco, Ax, and Tobias are chosen for the job. They fly to the capital to tell the govener. Will the govener beleve them, not beleve them, or is she already a Controller? Read the book to find out!!
Most Helpful First | Newest First
The Animorphs #51: Absolute by K A Applegate (Paperback - March 1 2001)
Used & New from: CDN$ 35.86