text:
Stage Long listing Short listing Step 1 Rate source quality on a scale of 1 - 3 (3 = High; 2 = Medium; 1 = Low/unkown) Provide a justification for your rating in the column provided Step 2 Rate methodology on a scale of 1 - 3 Step 3 Rate relevance to RQs 2 - 5 on a scale of 1 – 3 (3 = highly relevant/answers the question; 1 = not relevant/does not answer the question). Step 4 Mopping up Procedure Use RQ1 as basis for long listing RQ 1: What are the public's views on emerging food technologies? Step 1 Are public views on food tech mentioned in title or abstract? Yes 1a. Is it later than 1999 and in English and not a newspaper article? Yes Include in long list No Exclude from long list Maybe/indirectly Go to Q2. Step 2 Does a quick scan of the conclusions show that the article refers to public views on food tech? Yes Include in long list No exclude from long list There is a space for qualitative judgements about whether (and why) a paper should be shortlisted in the final column Use RQs 1 - 6, source and method quality as basis for shortlisting RQ1: What are the public's views on emerging food technologies? RQ2: Do views differ depending on type of technology? RQ3: What shapes the public's views? RQ4: Do different types of people hold different views? RQ5: How do views affect food choices/behaviour? RQ6: How have views changed over time? Do a quick scan of the introduction, methodology and conclusions to complete the following steps (5 mins max). Step 1 Rate source quality on a scale of 1 - 3 (3 = High; 2 = Medium; 1 = Low/unkown) Provide a justification for your rating in the column provided Step 2 Rate methodology on a scale of 1 - 3 (3 = primary research, clear and reasoned sampling and research design; 2 = primary research, limited sample size; 1= no primary research, comment) Step 3 Rate relevance to RQs 2 - 5 on a scale of 1 – 3 (3 = highly relevant/answers the question; 1 = not relevant/does not answer the question). Step 4 Using qualitative judgement and quantitative scoring, select the top articles from each of the seven areas (Novel food processes, Nanotechnology, Food irradiation, GM food, Animal cloning, Functional foods, Synthetic biology) Step 5 Check that articles that scored a 3 for any RQ AND a 3 for methodology are included. Up to 20 more articles from any category may be included at this stage. If there are more than 20, select the highest scoring. Step 1 Review 2 recent Evidence Reviews in each area and follow up any missing relevant references (i.e. another 14 papers). Step 2 Use phone calls to key individuals to find out what the professionals perceive to be the most influential reports, and ensure that these are included in the short list. Step 3 Scan titles abstracts on the long list to see if there is anything that in retrospect ought to be read. Note If a particular article does not score highly but we feel that it should nevertheless be included in the shortlist, we w Comments Note that there is no limit to the number of articles; this stage is limited only by time available FSA exclusion criteria Approx 100 articles Read NatCen 'Reviewing policy' document for what to look for in a methodology Note that research questions 2 - 6 are also an overarching analytical question that will be answered by cross comp e included in the shortlist, we will record our rationale for including it in the comments section. nly by time available tion that will be answered by cross comparison of research from different areas. However, they are also questions that may be answe they are also questions that may be answered in individual pieces in relation to a specific technology or technologies) technology or technologies) Technology/ies Full citation Title Year Food Biotechnology: A Study of U.S. 2007 Animal cloning Consumer Attitudinal Trends, 2007 REPORT Storey Consumers' Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and 2006 Animal cloning Purchase Intent Regarding Foods from the Hallman, W. K., Public Opinion and Media Coverage of Animal 2006 Animal cloning & Condry, S. C., Cloning and the Food Supply: Executive Sosin and What Will Consumers Do? Understanding 2003 Animal cloning Richards Consumer Response When Meat and Milk Agricultural Biotechnology And Public Attitudes 2000 Animal cloning In The European Union Einsiedel, E.F. Cloning and its discontents 2000 Animal cloning (2000). Cloning Neresini, F. And And man descended from the sheep: The 2000 Animal cloning man descended public debate on cloning in the Italian press Priest, SH. "US US public opinion divided over biotechnology? 2000 Animal cloning public opinion COI/FSA Animal cloning and its implications for the 2008 Animal cloning food chain - findings from research amongst Cloning, transgenic food and public opinion in 2007 Animal cloning Spain Consumer Attitudes toward Milk Products Animal cloning Produced from Cloned Cows FSA highlights FSA highlights consumers' concerns about Animal cloning consumers' animal cloning Gallup polls on cloning 2001- Animal cloning 2005 Gaskell Consumer perceptions of food products from 2007 Animal cloning cloned animals: A social scientific perspective DCBRA Public perceptions of farm animal cloning in There is Animal cloning Europe no date Einseidel Public perceptions of transgenic animals 2005 Animal cloning Cloned Food: What it Means to Eat Meat and 2008 Animal cloning Dairy from Cloned Animals EFSA draft opinion on animal cloning and food 2008 Animal cloning safety European group EU group on ethics in new science and 2008 Animal cloning on ethics in technologies report on ethical aspects of Eurobarometer Europeans' attitudes towards animal cloning 2008 Animal cloning Hossain, F. and Product attributes and consumer acceptance 2004 Onyango, B. of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified GM and biotechFunctional foodsProduct (2004) foods Hallman, W. K., Public perceptions of GM food: a national 2003 GM and biotech Hebden, W. C., study of American Knowledge and opinion Irish public perceptions and attitudes to 2001 GM and biotech modern biotechnology: an overview with a Mika, S. (2005) Britons Show Distaste for Biotech Foods 2005 GM and biotech Britons show Gaskell, G., Biotechnology and the European public 2000 GM and biotech Allum, N., Consumers And GM Food Labels: Providing 2000 GM and biotech Information Or Sowing Confusion? Do Consumers Really Refuse To Buy 2004 GM and biotech Genetically Modified Food? Effect of information about benefits of 2004 GM and biotech biotechnology on consumer acceptance of Perception of gene technology, and food risks: 2003 GM and biotech results of a survey in Switzerland Current issues in the understanding of 2002 GM and biotech consumer food choice Impact of BSE on attitudes to GM food 2001 GM and biotech The safety and social acceptance of novel 1999 GM and biotech foods Safety Assessment and Public Concern for 2002 GM and biotech Genetically Modified Food Products: The da Costa, M.C., Non conventional technologies and impact on 2000 GM and biotech Deliza, R., consumer behavior Exploring and modelling consumer attitudes 2003 GM and biotech towards genetically modified food The Importance of Brand, Product Information 1999 GM and biotech and Manufacturing Process in the Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing 2002 GM and biotech GM food Consumer beliefs and attitude towards 2003 GM and biotech genetically modified food: Basis for Saba, A and Consumer attitudes toward the use of gene 2002 GM and biotech Vassallo, M. technology in tomato production Focus Group Reactions to Genetically Modified 2002 GM and biotech Food Labels Seeds, food and trade wars: Public opinion 2004 GM and biotech and policy responses in the USA and Europe Townsend, E. Psychological Determinants of Willingness to 2004 GM and biotech and Campbell, Taste and Purchase Genetically Modified Food Examining Consumer Behavior Toward 2006 GM and biotech Genetically Modified (GM) Food in Britain GM foods and the misperception of risk 2004 GM and biotech perception An integrated research framework to 2008 GM and biotech understand consumer attitudes and purchase Why preferences change: Beliefs become 2006 GM and biotech more salient through provided (genomics) "Words of mass destruction": British 2006 GM and biotech newspaper coverage of the genetically A conjoint/logit analysis of consumers' 2007 GM and biotech responses to genetically modified tofu in A continuum of consumer attitudes toward 2006 GM and biotech genetically modified foods in the United States A new approach to elicit consumers 2005 GM and biotech willingness to purchase genetically modified A study of human behaviour in Hungary 2008 GM and biotech Acceptability of genetically modified maize by 2008 GM and biotech young people Acceptance by Irish consumers of a 2005 GM and biotech hypothetical GM dairy spread that reduces Acceptance of genetically modified foods: The 2008 GM and biotech relation between technology and evaluation Actual media reports on GM foods and Chinese 2006 GM and biotech consumers' willingness to pay for GM soybean Animals in their nature: a case study of public 2004 GM and biotech attitudes on animals, genetic modification and Are Feelings of Genetically Modified Food 2008 GM and biotech Politically Driven? Are perceptions of 'risks' and 'benefits' of 2007 GM and biotech genetically modified food (in)dependent? Attitudes towards genetically modified and 2006 GM and biotech organic foods Australian consumers' antecedents of attitudes 2006 GM and biotech towards foods produced by novel techniques. Australian consumers' preferences for 2008 GM and biotech conventional and novel sources of long chain Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to 2006 GM and biotech buy genetically modified foods in Urban China Categorizing genetically modified food 2007 GM and biotech products - Effects of labelling on information co-existence consultation - support for 2004 GM and biotech workshops - CB02038 Comparative advantage in demand: 2006 GM and biotech Experimental evidence of preferences for Consensus conferences - A case study: 2007 GM and biotech Publiforum in Switzerland with special respect Costa-Font, M, Consumer acceptance, valuation of and 2008 GM and biotech Gil, J. and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Consumer Attitudes toward GM Food and 2008 GM and biotech Pesticide Residues in India Consumer attitudes toward issues in food 2008 GM and biotech safety. Consumer responses to communication about 2008 GM and biotech food risk management Rigby, D, Consumer williness to pay to reduce GMO's in 2004 GM and biotech Young, T and food and increase the robustness of GM Consumer willingness to pay for genetically 2008 GM and biotech modified food in Kenya Consumers' images regarding genomics as a 2008 GM and biotech tomato breeding technology: "maybe it can GM Crops, The Farmers Perspective 2007 GM and biotech Determinants of consumer attitudes and 2007 GM and biotech purchase intentions with regard to genetically Do People really care about GM Food Risks? A 2004 GM and biotech latent State -Trait Model to differentiate Effects of information from sources in conflict 2006 GM and biotech and in consensus on perceptions of genetically Environmental Concerns boost support for GM 2007 GM and biotech crops Estimate consumer willingness to pay for 2003 GM and biotech reducing or eliminating GM products or Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' 2007 GM and biotech Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods Farmers' Understandings of Genetically Study GM and biotech Modified Crops within Local Communities complet GM food and neophobia: connecting with the 2008 GM and biotech gatekeepers of consumer choice Genetically modified crops and country image 2005 GM and biotech of food exporting countries Genetically Modified Food in the Eyes of the 2008 GM and biotech Public and Experts Genetically modified food labeling: The 2007 GM and biotech impacts of message and messenger on Genetically modified food market participation 2006 GM and biotech and consumer risk perceptions: A cross- Genomic Science, emerging public opinion 2004 GM and biotech How different are GM food accepters and 2008 GM and biotech rejecters really? A means-end chains Implicit attitudes towards genetically modified 2006 GM and biotech (GM) foods: A comparison of context-free and Inside or Outside the Bio-Science Tent?: The Study GM and biotech presentation of the laboratory-self complet Intuitive and explicit reactions towards "new" 2008 GM and biotech food technologies: attitude strength and Irish consumer acceptance of a hypothetical 2006 GM and biotech second-generation GM yogurt product Knowledge and acceptance of genetically 2006 GM and biotech modified foodstuffs in Hungary. More people likely to accept nano than GM, 2008 GM and biotech say researchers COI (2007) GM Omnibus Research Report 2007 GM and biotech Omnibus Perceptions of the risks and benefits of 2006 GM and biotech genetically-modified foods and their influence Potential market segments for genetically 2007 GM and biotech modified food: Results from cluster analysis Predictors of Australian consumers' intentions 2008 GM and biotech to consume conventional and novel sources of Process versus product: which determines 2005 GM and biotech consumer demand for genetically modified Public attitudes towards genetically-modified 2005 GM and biotech food Cormick, C Public Attitudes towards GM Crops and Food 2008 GM and biotech (2007). "Public Public awareness and perception of genetically 2006 GM and biotech modified/engineered foods in Trinidad, West Public perception of genetic engineering and 2007 GM and biotech the choice to purchase genetically modified Public reactions to information about 2007 GM and biotech genetically engineered foods: effects of Slovenian public opinion regarding genetically 2008 GM and biotech modified organisms in winemaking Spanish Consumers' Attitudes and 2007 GM and biotech Acceptability towards GM Food Products Chen, Mei-Fang The consumer's attitude toward genetically 2007 GM and biotech and Li, Hsiao- modified foods in Taiwan The effect of consumer risk perceptions on the 2007 GM and biotech propensity to purchase genetically modified The FSA's contribution to the public dialogue: 2003 GM and biotech consumer views of GM food Public attitudes to GM - note on qual research 2003 GM and biotech related to above Understanding public responses to genetic 2005 GM and biotech engineering through exploring intentions to DE LIVER Yaël; Unpacking attitudes towards genetically 2005 GM and biotech VAN DER PLIGT modified food US consumers' knowledge of GM foods 2006 GM and biotech Willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for non- 2007 GM and biotech GM foods versus willingness to accept (WTA) a Attitudes of European citizens to the 2008 GM and biotech environment with special focus section on GM Weighing up the costs and benefits of GM. 2003 GM and biotech Cabinet office report Food and the relation between values and 2005 GM and biotech attitude characteristics Perceived naturalness and acceptance of 2005 GM and biotech genetically modified food Blaine et al, Acceptance of genetically modified food: 2006 GM and biotech 2002 comparing consumer perspectives in the ANIMALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 2002 GM and biotech Gender theories and risk perception: a Study GM and biotech secondary analysis complet Genetically Modified Language 2004 GM and biotech How can genetically modified foods be made 2004 GM and biotech publicy acceptable? Is biotechnology a victim of anti-science bias 2008 GM and biotech in scientific journals? Knowledge, attitudes towards and 2008 GM and biotech acceptability of genetic modification in Public approval of plant and animal 2008 GM and biotech biotechnology in South Korea: An ordered vol 24 Stewart, Patrick Public opinion toward the first, second, and 2005 GM and biotech and McLean, third generations of plant biotechnology Public perceptions of agricultural 2007 GM and biotech biotechnology in Britain: the case of GM food Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan 2000 GM and biotech Ng, M.C., Attitudes of the Public and Scientists to 2000 GM and biotech Takeda, C., Biotechnology in Japan at the start of 2000 Gaskell, G., Climate change for biotechnology? UK public 2003 GM and biotech Allum, N., opinion 1991-2002. Alison Shaw … "It just goes against the grain." Public 2002 GM and biotech Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) J. Gutteling, L. Trust in governance and the acceptance of 2006 GM and biotech Hanssen, N. genetically modified food in the Netherlands J. Gutteling Biotechnology in the Netherlands: controversy 2002 GM and biotech or Consumer response to functional foods 2004 GM and biotech produced by conventional, organic, or genetic Four questions on European consumers' 2003 GM and biotech attitudes toward the use of genetic Consumer acceptance of nutritionally 2004 GM and biotech enhanced genetically modified food: relevance Enhanced GM foods: Are consumers ready to 2005 GM and biotech pay for the potential benefits of UNDERSTANDING CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS 2002 GM and biotech OF FERMENTED YOGHURT PRODUCTS USING BC Public Affairs Omnibus Survey for 2006 GM and biotech Greenpeace UK CONSUMERS, REGULATION AND THE 2004 GM and biotech MARKET FOR GM FOOD Department for GM Nation? The findings of the public debate GM and biotech Trade and Consumer views of GM food 1999 GM and biotech Ambivalent GM nation 2003 GM and biotech Perceptions, attitudes and ethical valuations: 2000 GM and biotech The ambivalence of the public image of The "Trust Gap" Hypothesis: Predicting 2003 GM and biotech Support for Biotechnology Across National The Risks and Benefits of Agricultural 2001 GM and biotech Biotechnology - Can Scientific and Public Talk Public Perceptions of Biotechnology 2006 GM and biotech Expert and Public Perception of Risk from 2004 GM and biotech Biotechnology The media and public opinion on genetics and 2005 GM and biotech biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls? Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the 2005 GM and biotech opinions of a better-informed public Culture and Technological Innovation: Impact 2007 GM and biotech of Institutional Trust and Appreciation of Biotechnology, media and public opinion 2004 GM and biotech across national boundaries Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low 2006 GM and biotech Information Public: Understanding U.S. Rimal, Arbindra Agro-biotechnology and organic food purchase 2005 GM and biotech P; Moon, in the United Kingdom But what do they really think? Identifying 2007 GM and biotech consumers values relevant to adopting Marketing biotech Soybeans with functional 2006 GM and biotech health attributes Opportunities for biotechnology and policy 2007 GM and biotech regarding mycotoxin issues in international Consumer attitudes toward biotech foods in 2006 GM and biotech China. Hoban, Thomas. Public Attitudes towards Agricultural 2004 GM and biotech (2004). Public Biotechnology Hossain, F., Consumer Acceptance of Food Biotechnology: 2002 GM and biotech Onyango, B., Willingness to Buy Genetically Modified Food Consumer Response to Genetically Modified 2001 GM and biotech Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Can health benefits break down Nordic 2000 GM and biotech consumers' rejection of genetically Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay 2002 GM and biotech for Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil and Ambivalent' individual preferences towards 2005 GM and biotech biotechnology in the European Union: Food and values: an examination of values 2005 GM and biotech underlying attitudes toward genetically Consumer acceptance of genetically modified 2003 GM and biotech foods in New Zealand Consumer perceptions of food products 2001 GM and biotech involving genetic modification—results from a Grunert, K., How can we know what we like when we don't 2004 GM and biotech Sondergaard, understand it? Consumer attitude formation An overview of findings from a six-country 2006 GM and biotech European survey on consumer attitudes to the Why do Some of the Public Reject Novel 2007 GM and biotech Scientific Technologies? A Synthesis of Results Acceptability of genetically modified cheese 2002 GM and biotech presented as real product alternative Eurobarometer 2006 2006 GM and biotech Consumer Attitudes to Food Standards: Wave 2008 GM and biotech 8 FSA Citizens' Jury - Should GM Food Be 2003 GM and biotech Available To Buy In The UK? Food Biotechnology: A Study of U.S. 2006 GM and biotech Consumer Attitudinal Trends 2006 REPORT GM Food: Public Opinion 2004 GM and biotech NO to GM 2004 GM and biotech Understanding attitudes towards genetically 2004 GM and biotech modified food: the role of values and attitudes Uncovering Factors Influencing Public 2002 GM and biotech Perceptions of Food Biotechnology Objective and Subjective Knowledge: Impacts 2004 GM and biotech on Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Who Do Consumers Trust for Information: The 2004 GM and biotech Case of Genetically Modified Foods? Hwang, Y.J., An Empirical Analysis of United States 2005 GM and biotech Roe, B. and Consumers' Concerns About Eight Food Consumer perceptions of genetically modified 2003 GM and biotech and organic foods: what kind of knowledge Ethics and genetic engineering - lessons to be 2002 GM and biotech learned from GM foods Influence of brand name and type of 2002 GM and biotech modification on consumer acceptance of Consumer attitudes towards genetically 2002 GM and biotech modified foods Gender differences in consumers' acceptance 2005 GM and biotech of genetically modified foods A MULTI-ATTRIBUTE MODEL OF PUBLIC 2001 GM and biotech ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED Public Attitudes toward Agrobiotechnology: 2004 GM and biotech The Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions on the Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified 2004 GM and biotech Foods: Role of Product Benefits and Perceived Effects of Context and Feelings on Perceptions 2004 GM and biotech of Genetically Modified Food Traill, W.B., Categories of GM Risk-Benefit Perceptions and 2004 GM and biotech Jaeger, S.R., Their Antecedents The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of 2000 GM and biotech Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetic 2002 GM and biotech Modification, Functional Foods, and Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified 2003 GM and biotech Foods: A Telephone Survey Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered 2003 GM and biotech Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Public Perceptions of Agricultural 2001 GM and biotech Biotechnologies in Europe Consumer attitudes to genetically modified 2001 GM and biotech organisms in food in the UK Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and 2001 GM and biotech Purchase Intentions With Regard to The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: 2002 GM and biotech Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Communicating about the Risks and Benefits 2003 GM and biotech of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating ―It just goes against the grain.‖ Public 2002 GM and biotech understandings of genetically modified (GM) Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the 2005 GM and biotech perceived risk of genetically modified food: an Press media reporting effects on risk 2008 GM and biotech perceptions and attitudes towards genetically Determinants of consumers' willingness to 2008 GM and biotech accept GM foods Predicting behaviour towards genetically 2007 GM and biotech modified food using implicit and explicit Public perceptions of transgenic animals 2005 GM and biotech Affective Influences on Risk Perceptions of, 2006 GM and biotech and Attitudes Toward, Genetically Modified Genetically Modified Organisms in the Food 2000 GM and biotech Supply: Public Opinion vs. Consumer Behavior An empirical investigation of the role of 2005 GM and biotech knowledge in public opinion about GM food Attitudes toward biotechnology in the 2002 GM and biotech European Union Publics' Opinions About Biotechnologies 2001 GM and biotech Poortinga, W. Public Perceptions of Genetically Modified Food 2004 GM and biotech and Pidgeon, and Crops, and the GM Nation? Public Debate IFIC Survey: Food Biotechnology Not a Top-of- 2005 GM and biotech Mind Concern for American Consumers Hossain, F. and Consumer perceptions of food-related risks 2006 GM and biotech Onyango, B. Genetically modified crops: the ethical and 1999 GM and biotech social issues Global plant biotechnology and the need for an 2005 GM and biotech educated public running risks 2002 GM and biotech George Gaskell, Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: 2006 GM and biotech Agnes Patterns and Trends (Eurobarometer) Pew Initiative Public sentiment about GM food (Pew) 2006 GM and biotech on Food and IGD Genetically Modified Foods - Consumer 2008 GM and biotech Research EC (2008) EC Framework 6: DO EUROPEAN CONSUMERS 2008 GM and biotech BUY GM FOODS? Willingness to try new foods as predicted by 2004 GM and biotech social representations and attitude and trait Brewer, M.S. Consumer attitudes to food safety issues 2002 and Prestat, Novel food processesIrradiation C.J. (2002) Cardello, A.V., Consumer perceptions of foods processed by 2007 Schutz, H.G. innovative and emerging technologies: A Novel food processesIrradiation and Lesher, L.L. conjoint analytic study Henson, S., Understanding Consumer Attitudes towards 2007 Annou, M., Food Technologies in Canada Novel food processesIrradiation Cranfield, J., Ronteltap, A., Consumer acceptance of technology-based 2007 van Trijp, food innovations Novel food processesIrradiation J.C.M., Renes, Wilcock, A., Consumer attitudes, knowledge and 2004 Pun, M., Novel food processesIrradiation behaviour: a review of food safety issues Cardello, J. and Khanona, A.V. Consumer concerns and expectations about 2003 Novel food processes (2003) novel food processing technologies: effects on Consumer attitude towards information on non 2003 Novel food processes conventional technology Miles, S., Public worry about specific food safety issues 2004 Novel food processes Brennan, M., Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward 2006 Novel food processes Food Technologies Public perception of scientific uncertainty in 2003 Novel food processes relation to food hazards Construction and validation of a psychometric 2008 Novel food processes scale to measure consumers' fears of novel New insights into consumer-led food product 2006 Novel food processes development MAFF Information sources and their influence on 1997 Novel food processes public perceptions of food hazards Lampila, P. and Consumers' attitudes towards high pressure 2007 Novel food processes Lahteenmaki, L. freezing of food Enhancing consumer acceptance of new 2007 Novel food processes processing technologies Feeding the debate- A report from the debate 2002 Novel food processes task force of the food chain and crops industry e.g Slovic, P. Psychometric paradigm 1992 Novel food processes Perception of Human food choices: An examination of the 2005 Novel food processes factors underlying acceptance/rejection of Novel foods and food allergies: A review of the 2006 Novel food processes issues Student and Teacher Attitudes and Behaviors 2008 Novel food processes Toward Novel Foods Cox, D.N., The influence of information and beliefs about 2007 Novel food processes Evans, G. and technology on the acceptance of novel food User involvement in radical innovation: are 2007 Novel food processes consumers conservative? Mireaux, M., An adaptation of repertory grid methodology 2007 Novel food processes Cox, D.N., to evaluate Australian consumers' perceptions Consumers' everyday food choice strategies in 2006 Novel food processes Finland Fear of food in Europe? Fear of foods in 2008 Novel food processes Europe through Hungarian experience Jane Cameron; The Navigator Network': a New Zealand 2008 Novel food processes Barbara futurewatch case study Wilcock, A., Consumer attitudes, knowledge and 2004 Novel food processes Pun, M., behaviour: a review of food safety issues Deliza, R., Application of high pressure technology in the 2005 Novel food processes Rosenthal, A., fruit juice processing: benefits perceived by Bruhn, C.M. Consumer acceptance of food innovations 2008 Novel food processes (2008), Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and 2006 Novel food processes Engineering Siegrist, M. (in Factors influencing public acceptance of in press Novel food processes press) Factors innovative food technologies and products Butz, P., Needs, Consumer attitudes to high pressure food 2003 Novel food processes E. C., Baron, A., processing L Frewer and H Understanding Consumers of Food Products 2006 Novel food processes van Trijp, Acceptance of 2% Ultra-Pasteurized Milk by 2001 Novel food processes Consumers, 6 to 11 Years Old Chern, W.S., Willingness to Pay for PEF-processed Orange 2003 Novel food processes Kaneko, N. and Juice: Evidence from an Auction Experiment CONSUMER AND TRAINED PANEL 2007 Novel food processes EVALUATION OF HIGH PRESSURE THERMALLY Health Professionals' Attitudes and Educational 2008 Novel food processes Needs Regarding New Food Processing Deliza, R., da Acceptance of novel food technologies - 2003 Novel food processes Costa, M.C., comparison between Brazilian and British Consumer Preferences for Food Irradiation: 2002 Irradiation How Favorable and Unfavorable Descriptions Hayes, D.J., Experts and activists: how information affects 2002 Irradiation Fox, J.A. and the demand for food irradiation The Promise of Food Irradiation: Will 2003 Irradiation Consumers Accept It? Consumer acceptance of irradiated meat 1999 Irradiation Gunes, G. and Preferences of Turkish people for irradiated, 2007 Irradiation Tekin, M.D. GM or organic foods Influences on Purchase of Irradiated Foods 2002 Irradiation Frenzen, P., Consumer Acceptance of Irradiated Meat and 2000 Irradiation Majchrowicz, A., Poultry Products Johnson, A. M., Consumer attitudes towards irradiated food: 2004 Irradiation Reynolds, A. E., 2003 vs. 1993 Integrating the consumer interest in food 2002 Irradiation safety: the role of science and other factors Food safety risk: Consumer perception and 2001 Irradiation purchase behaviour Hunter, C. Changing attitudes to irradiation throughout 2000 Irradiation (2000) the food chain College-Age Consumers' Knowledge and 2007 Irradiation Perceptions of Food Irradiation Consumer Knowledge and Perceptions of Food 2006 Irradiation Irradiation: Ground Beef Study Consumers' willingness to pay for irradiated 2007 Irradiation poultry products. Determining the food irradiation beliefs of 2006 Irradiation community nutrition educators: Do beliefs Effect of an Educational Program on Attitudes 2007 Irradiation of California Consumers Toward Food Gunes, G. and Consumer awareness and acceptance of 2006 Irradiation Tekin, M.D. irradiated foods: Results of a survey Knowledge, attitude, and practice of the use of 2006 Irradiation irradiated meat among respondents to the Grande, J., Assessment of Consumer Risk Attitudes and 1999 Irradiation Bjornstad, E., Behaviour Related to Countermeasures and He, S., Fletcher, Unwillingness to Consume Irradiated Beef 2005 Irradiation S. and Rimal, A. Commercial feasibility and evaluation of 2005 Irradiation consumer acceptance for certain irradiated Fox, J., Bruhn, Consumer acceptance of irradiated meats 2001 Irradiation C. and Sapp, S. Consumer acceptance of irradiated foods: 2002 Irradiation dawn of a new era? Consumer Willingness to Pay for Irradiated 2002 Irradiation Beef Do Handling and Cooking Practices Determine 1999 Irradiation the Selection of Irradiated Beef? Hashim, I.B., Consumer purchase behaviour of irradiated 2001 Irradiation McWatters, beef products: a simulated supermarket CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRON-BEAM 2004 Irradiation IRRADIATED READY-TO-EAT POULTRY MEATS Acceptability of minimally processed and 2008 Irradiation irradiated pineapple and watermelon among He, S., Fletcher, Attitudes, Acceptance, and Consumption: The 2005 Irradiation S. and Rimal, A. Case of Beef Irradiation Intended vs. Actual Purchase Behavior for 2004 Irradiation Irradiated Beef: A Simulated Supermarket Experts and Advocates: How Information 2002 Irradiation Affects the Demand for Food Irradiation The Impact of Risk Communication on the 2007 Irradiation Acceptance of Irradiated Food Frenzen, P.D., Consumer Acceptance of Irradiated Meat and 2001 Irradiation DeBess, E.E., Poultry in the United States Information Effects on Consumers' Willingness 2005 Irradiation to Purchase Irradiated Food Products BRAZILIAN CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF 2002 Irradiation IRRADIATED FOOD: INITIAL TRIALS Young, A.L. Food irradiation: after 35 years, have we 2003 Irradiation (2003) Food made progress. A government perspective. Public Perceptions of Food Safety: Assessing 2002 Irradiation the Risks Posed by Genetic Modification, Attitudes to food irradiation in Europe 2002 Irradiation Sapp, S.G. A comparison of alternative theoretical 2003 Irradiation (2003) A explanations of consumer food safety Consumers' perceptions of irradiated ground 2004 Irradiation beef after education and product exposure PERCEPTION OF IRRADIATED FOODS AMONG 2008 Irradiation STUDENTS (SECONDARY, UNIVERSITY [FOOD Valuing Conflicting Public Information about a 2005 Irradiation New Technology: The Case of Irradiated Foods Climate Change for Biotechnology? UK Public 2003 Nanotechnologies Opinion 1991-2002 Framing Effects on Public Opinion about 2005 Nanotechnologies Nanotechnology Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning 2006 Nanotechnologies and trust in government Toxic effects of nanoparticles and 2006 Nanotechnologies nanomaterials: Implications for public health, Lee, C-J., Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies 2005 Nanotechnologies Scheufele, D.A. What drives public acceptance of 2006 Nanotechnologies nanotechnology? Priest, S. The North American opinion climate for 2006 Nanotechnologies (2006), The nanotechnology and its products: Scientists worry about some risks more than 2007 Nanotechnologies the public From our readers: Public attitudes to nanotech 2004 Nanotechnologies in Europe and the United States Kahan, D.M., Affect, Values, and Nanotechnology Risk 2007 Nanotechnologies Slovic, P., Perceptions: An Experimental Investigation Nanotechnology: Implications for Food and 2007 Nanotechnologies Nutrition Professionals Falling Through the Cracks? Public Perception, 2006 Nanotechnologies Risk, and the Oversight of Emerging Nanojury UK Reflecting upon the UK's Citizens' Jury on 2006 Nanotechnologies (2005), Our Nanotechnologies: NanoJury UK Small Talk reveals all 2007 Nanotechnologies Michael Siegrist, Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of 2007 Nanotechnologies Carmen Keller, Nanotechnology Hazards In the Public Eye: The Early Landscape of 2005 Nanotechnologies Nanotechnology among Canadian and U.S. Macoubrie, J. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and ? (looks Nanotechnologies (2005), Trust in Government recent) Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty: 2007 Nanotechnologies Experience, Trust, and Attitudes in a Swiss Americans' Nanotechnology Risk Perception: 2006 Nanotechnologies Cook, A.J. and Assessing opinion change Fairweather, J.R. New Zealander Reactions to the use of 2006 Nanotechnologies (2006), New Biotechnology and Nanotechnology in A Proposal to Advance Understanding of 2007 Nanotechnologies Nanotechnology's Social Impacts Gavelin, K., Democratic technologies? The final report of 2007 Nanotechnologies Wilson R. and the nanotechnology engagement group (NEG) Cook, A.J. and Intentions of New Zealanders to purchase 2007 Nanotechnologies Fairweather, lamb or beef made using nanotechnology Nanologue Nanalogue 2006 Nanotechnologies (2006), Nanodialogues: Nanodialogues: Experiments in public 2007 Nanotechnologies experiments in engagement with science Nanoscience and 2004 Nanotechnologies nanotechnologies:opportunities and William Sims Nanotechnology and Social Trends 2007 Nanotechnologies Bainbridge, Nanotechnology field observations: scouting 2008 Nanotechnologies the new industrial west Nanotechnology: Views of the General Public 2004 Nanotechnologies Out of the laboratory and on to our plates. 2008 Nanotechnologies Nanotechnology in food and agriculture Siegrist, M., Perceived risks and perceived benefits of 2008 Nanotechnologies Stampfli, N., different nanotechnology foods and Qualitative system analysis as a means for 2008 Nanotechnologies sustainable governance of emerging Risks and nanotechnology: the public is more 2007 Nanotechnologies concerned than experts and industry. Siegrist, M., Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods 2007 Nanotechnologies Cousin, M-E., and food packaging: the influence of affect Down on the Farm: the effects of nanoscale 2004 Nanotechnologies technologies on food and agriculture Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support 2005 Nanotechnologies for Nanojury witness 2005 Nanotechnologies sessions/recommendations/discussion paper Smallman, M. http://www.smalltalk.org.uk/page11g.html N/A Nanotechnologies and Nieman, A. Nature Nature on nanojury (editorial) 2005 Nanotechnologies (Editorial) Kahan, D.M., Biased assimilation, polarisation and cultural 2008 Nanotechnologies Slovic, P., credibility: an experimental study of FDA and Nanotechnology: 2008 Nanotechnologies Public Perceptions Matter Why nanofear will not disappear 2005 Nanotechnologies Verbeke, W. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: 2005 Functional foods (2005) socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal A conjoint-based approach to concept 2005 Functional foods optimisation: probiotic beverages Acceptance of functional foods: A comparison 2006 Functional foods of French, American, and French Canadian All foods affect health': understanding of 2007 Functional foods functional foods and healthy eating among Consumer attitudes and acceptance of CLA- 2006 Functional foods enriched dairy products Consumer valuations and preference 2006 Functional foods heterogeneity for a novel functional food Urala, N. and Consumers' changing attitudes towards 2007 Functional foods Lahteenmaki, L. functional foods Exercise enthusiasts' perceptions and beliefs 2007 Functional foods of functional foods in Trinidad, West Indies Factors influencing consumers' willingness to 2007 Functional foods use beverages and ready-to-eat frozen soups Functional & amp; Fortified Food Trends 2008 Functional foods Functional Food, Drinks & Ingredients: 2008 Functional foods Consumer Attitudes & Trends Verbeke, W. Functional foods: Consumer willingness to 2006 Functional foods (2006) compromise on taste for health? Healthful ingredients drive new products 2008 Functional foods Heart disease among post-menopausal 2006 Functional foods women: Acceptability of functional foods as a Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in 2006 Functional foods experimental functional food choices Influence of gender, age and motives 2007 Functional foods underlying food choice on perceived Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Reported 2008 Functional foods Practices of Pennsylvania Registered Dietitians Motivational factors for consuming omega-3 2008 Functional foods PUFAs: an exploratory study with Danish Motivations and cognitive structures of 2008 Functional foods consumers in their purchasing of functional PHARMACEUTIC Opinion: Scientific support makes functional 2008 Functional foods AL MARKETING - food health benefit claims more palatable to Taking it to the next level. Consumer 2006 Functional foods palatability of BPI-enhanced steaks. Henson, S., The propensity of consumers to offset health 2008 Functional foods Masakure, O. risks through the use of functional foods and The Top 10 Functional Food Trends 2008 Functional foods Understanding Australian consumers' 2007 Functional foods perceptions of selenium and motivations to Herath, D., Who consumes functional foods and 2008 Functional foods Cranfield, J. and nutraceuticals in Canada? Results of cluster Siegrist, M., Consumers' willingness to buy functional 2008 Functional foods Stampfli, N. and foods: The influence of carrier, benefit and Role of functional foods in managing disease: 2007 Functional foods what are the views of European consumers? Landstrom, E., Use of functional foods among Swedish 2007 Functional foods Koivisto Hursti, consumers is related to health-consciousness You eat what you are: Modern health worries 2007 Functional foods and the acceptance of natural and synthetic Is there a market for functional wines? 2008 Functional foods Consumer preferences and willingness to pay The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of 2000 Functional foods Dietitians Licensed in Oregon Regarding Consumer response to functional foods 2004 Functional foods produced by conventional, organic, or genetic Consumers' Valuation of Functional Properties 2005 Functional foods of Foods: Results from a Canada-wide Survey Consumer acceptance of nutritionally 2004 Functional foods enhanced genetically modified food: relevance Product attributes and consumer acceptance 2004 Functional foods of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified UNDERSTANDING CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS 2002 Functional foods OF FERMENTED YOGHURT PRODUCTS USING McConnon, A., Differences in perceptions of functional foods: 2004 Functional foods Fletcher, P.L., UK public vs. nutritionists Consumer perception of the functional dairy 2002 Functional foods food market in Northern Ireland Consumer acceptance of functional foods: 2003 Functional foods issues for the future Reduced-fat foods: the shopper's viewpoint 2002 Functional foods Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of 2003 Functional foods functional food consumers and dietary Tuorila, H. and Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in 2002 Functional foods Cardello, A.V. the presence of specific health claims Exploring Consumer Attitudes Towards 2004 or Functional foods Functional Foods: A Qualitative Study 2005? A qualitative analysis of consumer perceptions 2004 Functional foods of mood, food and mood-enhancing functional Functional food. Product development, 2008 Functional foods marketing and consumer acceptance—A Assessment of the Dieticians' Attitudes about 2005 Functional foods Functional Foods and Their Needs for Training Knowledge, Attitudes Toward Functional Foods 2006 Functional foods among Adults Working in the National Understanding consumers' perception of 2008 Functional foods conventional and functional yogurts using Messina, F., Older people's perceptions towards 2008 Functional foods Saba, A., conventional and functional yoghurts through International Functional Foods: Attitudinal Research (2002) 2002 Functional foods Food The Consumer View On Functional Foods: 2002 Functional foods Yesterday And Today Poulsen, J. Danish consumers' attitudes towards 1999 Functional foods (1999) Danish functional foods The perceived healthiness of functional foods 2003 Functional foods a conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and Reasons behind consumers' functional food 2003 Functional foods choices Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use 2004 Functional foods functional foods International 2008 Food and Health Survey 2008 Functional foods Food Functional cheese still niche in the UK 2007 Functional foods Functional food development: concept to 2007 Functional foods reality Dean, M., Consumer perceptions of healthy cereal 2007 Functional foods Shepherd, R., products and production methods Making nutrigenomics work - integrating 2008 Functional foods expert stakeholder opinions and consumer Stewart-Knox, Consumer acceptance of functional foods. 2007 Functional foods B. J., Vaz De An overview of findings from a six-country 2006 Functional foods European survey on consumer attitudes to the The potential for competitive and healthy food 2008 Functional foods chains of benefit to the countryside Consumer Response To Functional Foods In 2000 Functional foods The 21st Century Exploring new functional markets potential: 2007 Functional foods factors affecting willingness to purchase Health-care professionals' perceived trust in 2007 Functional foods and willingness to recommend functional http://royalsoci Synthetic biology call for views- submissions 2007 Synthetic biology ety.org/docume De Vriend, Constructing Life: Early social reflections on 2006 Synthetic biology Huib. the emerging field of synthetic biology ETC Group Global Coalition Sounds the Alarm on 2006 Synthetic biology (2006) ‗Global Synthetic Biology, Demands Cultural Cognition and Synthetic Biology Risk 2008 Synthetic biology Oversight and Perceptions: A Preliminary Analysis Andrianantoand Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for 2006 Synthetic biology ro, E., Basu, S., an emerging discipline Mark Greener, Is the grass greener on the other side? 2005 Synthetic biology EMBO reports 9, Encouraging the development of synthetic http://www.etc BioBricks or BioConflicts? Building Public Trust 2007 Synthetic biology group.org/en/m in European Governance of Synthetic Biology aterials/publicat Search terms/ Summary search engine animal cloning Favorable opinion about animal cloning public has increased five percent in the last animal cloning More than 6 out of 10 people would buy public or consider buying food derived from animal cloning Public opinion is "soft" on cloning, public meaning that it quickly moves in a animal cloning Responses to poll questions do not public translate to buying behavior. animal cloning The future of GM foods in Europe is public unclear. Ref from Fischoff Public attitudes to Dolly the sheep may et al mirror the perception of biotechnology animal cloning Why did Dolly manage to unleash such public pandemonium? animal cloning Although a majority of US citizens public remain supportive, opposition to FSA list Public perceptions of animal cloning and it's potential use in the food chain FSA list FSA list FSA list Gallup website FSA list Review of exisitng quant and qual research (including Eurobarometer Animal cloning public Search of FoE website a public consultation on its draft scientific opinion on the implications of Report on ethical aspects of animal cloning for food supply Widespread awareness of animal cloning. Very widespread concerns google scholar: the relationship between consumer "functional characteristics and their willingness to foods" "public consume GM functional foods animal cloning Most Americans do not mention genetic public modification when asked what animal cloning Irish attitudes on GM foods in the 1990s public What biotech Comparison of Gallup polls in UK, US food issues? and Canada animal cloning The latest European sample survey of public public perceptions of biotechnology food irradiation consumers want GM food labelled food irradiation % of French people willing / not to buy public opinion GM food food irradiation influence of information on willingness public opinion to buy GM food, also mentions influence food irradiation influence of attitudes towards public opinion technology and political views on GM food irradiation Attitude to technology influences food public attitude choice food irradiation People associate GM food with BSE public attitude novel food Compares attitudes in developed and processes public developing countries and concludes that novel food People won't buy GM food until it has processes public some proven benefits novel food Impact of info about food technology processes and it environmental benefits on novel food Different attitudes towards branded and processes generic GM products novel food Attitude towards technology varies processes between products, and people make novel food Applies the theory of planned behaviour processes to intentions to buy GM food novel food Segments audience according to processes attitudes, and looks at demographic novel food Applies the theory of reasoned action to processes attitudes and intentions to eat GM Low awareness of GM, and negative reactions to 'GM free' labels food includes summaries of public opinion nanotechnology polls in EU and US food criticises other surveys and tests a nanotechnology sample of 100 people on attitudes and food theory of planned behaviour and how nanotechnology people decide to eat GM food food mainly qual study (plus a look at the nanotechnology Eurobarometer) to see whether it's the food attitudes towards GM in Taiwan nanotechnology FSA list FSA list extracts from focus groups mostly FSA list influences on GM tofu consumption in Taiwan FSA list segments US population on attitudes towards GM FSA list experimental auctions to determine WTP for GM apples FSA list FSA list attitudes of Greek students towards GM corn chips FSA list attitudes of Irish people towards GM spread FSA list FSA list negative media reports have more of an impact than positive media reports FSA list GM animals FSA list influence of politics on attitudes towards GM FSA list perceptions of risks and benefits of GM are not independent FSA list influences on attitudes towards GM FSA list antecedents of attitudes towards technologies FSA list Segmented on basis of attitude to GM FSA list Chinese attitudes towards GM (more positive than other countries) FSA list more about how people think about GM products when there's no reference FSA list how to ensure GM and organic farming can coexist FSA list differences in attitudes towards GM in US and UK+France FSA list this is more about the engagement process than about attitudes FSA list review of current state of public attitudes FSA list attitudes in India towards GM, and trade-offs against reduced pesticise FSA list FSA list risk communication in different contexts / cultures FSA list includes a chapter on consumer attitudes to GM FSA list attitudes towards GM in Kenya FSA list FSA list farmers attitudes towards GM FSA list influence of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes on acceptance of GM FSA list psychological perspective FSA list influences on risk perception with regard to GM FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list What do farmers think about GM and what do they see as the influences on FSA list test stalls of GM food show people are willing to buy it FSA list Interviews with gatekeepers and a test stall of GM and conventional cherries on FSA list compares expert and general public views - public think GM is worst of 18 FSA list what sort of GM labelling people would like FSA list compares Chinese and Romanian attitudes to GM - Romanians are more FSA list trends in public opinion towards GM FSA list Segments German mothers on likelihood of buying GM yogurt FSA list explicit and implicit attitudes towards GM are different? FSA list FSA list compares implicit and explicit attitudes towards GM FSA list segments Irish public on GM attitudes FSA list Hungarian attitudes towards GM FSA list Attitudes towards nano likely to be more positive than GM FSA list FSA list benefits are more important than risks in shaping attitudes, and about half of FSA list four segments found in NZ study on willingness to consume GM fruit FSA list FSA list some people have an attitude towards GM, while others evaluate different FSA list FSA list Farmer and public attitudes in Australia FSA list Attitudes towards GM in Trinidad FSA list FSA list impact of different types of info on attitudes towards GM, and differences FSA list Slovenian attitudes to GM wine FSA list attitudes towards GM in Spain and differences btw types of people FSA list relationships between trust, knowledge and attitudes FSA list negative attitudes towards GM in Romania FSA list summary of FSA work on GM FSA list FSA list NZ attitudes towards hypothetical GM milk, and influences on attitudes FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list Study to investigate how values relate to attitudes toward GM food and organic FSA list Study to examine people's acceptance of genetically modified food FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list criticism of another study FSA list Explores perceptions in public and scientific community RE`The Big Lie' - FSA list clusters German population on attitude to GM: positive, negative and indifferent FSA list FSA list This paper considers public attitudes toward genetically modified plants in FSA list Ref from Fischoff et al animal cloning public animal cloning public animal cloning influence of trust on attitudes towards public GM animal cloning public google scholar: people with negative views about GM functional food may avoid functional GM foods even if google scholar: functional food google scholar: using GM to develop funtional foods - functional food people are more likely to accept them if google scholar: people are willing to pay more for GM "functional foods that have either enhanced flavour google scholar: people have negative attitudes towards "functional GM and are neutral towards search of Greenpeace Annie found in library Referred to findings from the public debate everywhere Referred to in "Genomic Referred to in changes in attitudes over time (1990s) "Genomic novel food Talks about the limitations of some processes public attitude studies and the difference in animal cloning Differences between European and U.S. public reactions to biotechnology appear to be food irradiation public attitudes don't take science into public opinion account much food irradiation summarises various surveys on public public opinion attitudes to biotechnology public attitude compares public attitudes with expert OR opinion OR attitudes on biotechnology public attitude public opinion on biotechnology is not OR opinion OR solely driven by media stories food Attitudes of people who understand nanotechnology science towards biotechnology food appreciation of nature and trust in nanotechnology Germany and USA, and their impact on food reviews US and European opinion data nanotechnology food What drives public opinion on nanotechnology biotechnology FSA list FSA list However, little has been published regarding consumer-held values that FSA list This study investigates possible marketing strategies for biotechnology FSA list Despite being introduced more than a decade ago, agricultural biotechnology FSA list acceptance of biotech foods in China google scholar: most research in this area has been functional food carried out in US and Europe, evidence google scholar: examines acceptance of biotechnology functional food through willingness to buy followed up a reference followed up a people don't like GM but get a bit less reference suspicious if it has health benefits followed up a reference followed up a While people don't know much about reference biotech their attitudes will continue to followed up a influence of attitudes, values and beliefs reference followed up a NZ attitudes are negative reference followed up a GM viewed as a negative value in itself, reference which benefits of GM can't overcome followed up a reference FSA list consumer attitudes to the metabolic syndrome, genetics in nutrition, and google scholar: summarises results from a research "food programme into NZ attitudes to followed up a reference google: representative samples in European eurobarometer countries - opinions on biotech searched for survey by FSA shows decline in concern "GM public over GM searched for "GM public searched for GM trends in US attitudes on IFIC website looked around interviews on MORI website followed up a changes in attitudes reference followed up a influence of attitudes reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a People have less negative concerns reference about GM when viewed in the context of followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a Views are more positive towards reference functional foods than GM followed up a reference followed up a reference followed up a reference google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: Attitudes influence trust in information public attitude sources, rather than info from a google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: allintitle: public google scholar: allintitle: public google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude google scholar: public attitude searched for "biotechnology" This is about biotech in general, including GM, cloning, nano, stem cell followed up a A summary of the polls they have reference conducted for Pew between 2001 and followed up a reference FSA list Conjoint analytic surveys were administered to 225 potential consumers of foods processed by was searching risk perception influences peoples views for something of food technologies (and technology in else general) followed up a reference food irradiation influence of attitudes on behaviour public opinion food irradiation Do people like / dislike foods when they public attitude hear it has been treated with a novel novel food Focus groups to find out what people processes public make of info about novel food processes food irradiation risk perception and influence of various public opinion demographic factors food irradiation trust, risk perception and attitudes public attitude towards food technologies food irradiation people view risk in different ways public attitude depending on whether they have control food Authors develop a scale to measure nanotechnology food neophobia FSA list FSA list FSA list This paper investigated attitudes towards the high pressure freezing of FSA list FSA list it is possible to engage people about new technologies before they are FSA list FSA list Investigated choice of familiar and novel animal and nonanimal foods. FSA list This review identifies and explores the current issues around different types of FSA list No info yet FSA list Consumers appear to be cautious about accepting novel technologies applied to FSA list Consumers are sometimes unexpectedly resistant toward radically innovative assess the acceptance of novel food technologies, the Repertory Grid Method In developed countries, choosing and purchasing food is today perhaps more . Consumers fear the unknown the most. Therefore, accurate, reliable and food irradiation influence of attitudes on behaviour public opinion "food When people are provided with irradiation" information about technology's benefits "food outlines a range of factors that irradiation" influence people's acceptance of food "food book, one relevant chapter irradiation" followed up a reference referred to in 2 includes chapter on "Consumer articles attitudes to food innovation and Google scholar: consumer Google scholar: public attitude Google scholar: consumer google scholar: "new food google: novel food food irradiation relative impacts of positive / negative description of technology, and info food irradiation sounds like the same data as above, but presented in a different way food irradiation looked at consumers' willingness to pay for irradiated food - influenced by food irradiation "Studies indicate that consumers who receive even minimal presentation on FSA list food irradiation Information influences willingness to buy irradiated food; also gender and food irradiation "half of consumers were willing to buy irradiated meat or poultry, and only a food irradiation people are more concerned about other technologies than food irradiation, and food irradiation consumers aren't very happy about various food technologies in general food irradiation What factors influence public perception public attitude on food safety food irradiation Different views towards irradiation public attitude among consumers and other FSA list No info yet. FSA list No info yet. FSA list The willingness of consumers to buy and pay for irradiated poultry products FSA list To develop an instrument to measure the food irradiation beliefs of FSA list No info yet. FSA list Consumer awareness and acceptance, and influence of benefit statements and FSA list The objective of this study was to determine consumer knowledge, "food very long document irradiation" "food Asked people why they're opposed to irradiation" food irradiation "food generally positive responses to irradiation" irradiation in Egypt "food book chapter irradiation" "food outlines food irradiation processes and irradiation" public opinion in US "food WTP for irradiated beef irradiation" "food impact of demographics and of what irradiation" they're about to cook on whether "food impact of information about irradiation irradiation" on whether people buy irradiated meat "food consumer panel preferred irradiated irradiation" meat over non-irradiated after it had "food people didn't notice any differences btw irradiation" irradiated (different doses) and non- "food demographic influences on acceptability irradiation" of irradiation "food expressed intentions don't correlate irradiation" with actions when it comes to buying or "food negative info has more influence than irradiation" positive info "food impact of negative info on acceptance irradiation" "food influence of demographics on attitudes irradiation" "food influence of information irradiation" "food influence of information irradiation" "food Not much change in public attitudes irradiation" over last 35 years in US "food asked people to rank irradiation risks irradiation" against others, but the only other searched for summarises objections "food food irradiation influence of friends, family and trust in public opinion institutions followed up a reference food Tracks public opinion on biotechnology nanotechnology over 10 yrs food How do people's opinions vary nanotechnology depending on how info about food What do people think about nanotechnology nanotechnology in general and specific food potential for nanoparticles to affect nanotechnology humans incl. through food chains food emotions modify the impact of nanotechnology knowledge on attitudes towards food large scale study of public attitudes nanotechnology towards nanotechnology and what food survey in US and Canada of public nanotechnology opinion on nanotechnology food differences btw public and scientists in nanotechnology attitudes towards nanotechnology food response to an article nanotechnology food how do people form opinions about nanotechnology nanotechnology food nanotechnology food claims to look at public perceptions of nanotechnology nanotechnology applications food mainly about how to do public nanotechnology engagement, but worth a look for some food summary of a public engagement nanotechnology programme on nanotechnology and food differences btw lay people and experts nanotechnology in attitudes towards nanotechnology, food What do Canadians and Americans think nanotechnology about nanotechnology and what food results of a recent survey? nanotechnology food qual work on attitudes towards nanotechnology nanotechnology in Switzerland food Variation between gender, education nanotechnology level etc on how information about food includes nanotechnology with respect to nanotechnology food specifically - large scale postal FSA list No information FSA list Report explored attempts to engage the public in discussions about the FSA list This paper aims to provide an early assessment of key influences on FSA list Nanologue's overarching objective was to help establish a common FSA list explored public views of nanotechnology, in particular explored FSA list Independent study on nanotechnologies including social science. Chapter 7 FSA list The impact of nanotechnology depends not merely upon the technical FSA list This paper highlights some of the recent work conducted by the Project on FSA list The quantitative research aimed to assess awareness about FSA list A report on nanotechnology, prepared by Friends of the Earth, includes a FSA list German speaking part of Switzerland, lay people's (N=337) perceptions of 19 FSA list Sustainable governance of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology is FSA list FSA list google search for synthetic from refs in row 23 From refs of row 7 Small Talk is a collaboration exploring the aspirations and concerns of Refered to Supporters of full-blown reflexiveness should welcome a transparent citizens' Search of Woodrow Wilson Search of Woodrow Wilson Search of Woodrow Wilson public attitude what determines people's attitudes OR opinion OR towards functional foods FSA list FSA list Expanding on previous research, we investigate young consumers' FSA list This paper presents the results of a study from Finland, in which focus FSA list A variety of functional milk products have been launched into the market, FSA list , this paper presents 1 research technique exploring differences in FSA list In our earlier research, seven dimensions reflected consumers' FSA list There is unprecedented interest by consumers to improve health and FSA list A survey of attitudes to beverages and soups containing beta-glucan among FSA list Not found. FSA list Not found. FSA list This study investigates socio- demographic and attitudinal FSA list This article examines several ingredients consumers are using to FSA list This study reports the results of eight focus group interviews with post- FSA list The associations of liking and perceived healthiness ratings between repeated FSA list The aims of the present study were to study the effect of different carriers and FSA list No info yet. FSA list Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have a positive effect on FSA list The present study initially fulfils a two- fold aim: first, to identify the functional FSA list FSA list looks at identifying whether injected beef products can appeal to consumers, FSA list The propensity of consumers to offset health risks through the use of FSA list No info yet. FSA list Consumers' knowledge of antioxidants, minerals and selenium (Se), their FSA list Heterogeneity in the receptivity of consumers towards functional foods is FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list FSA list google scholar: functional food google scholar: people with negative views about GM functional food may avoid functional GM foods even if google scholar: reports the same data as above paper, functional food with a different angle. People like plant- google scholar: using GM to develop funtional foods - functional food people are more likely to accept them if google scholar: the relationship between consumer "functional characteristics and their willingness to google scholar: people have negative attitudes towards "functional GM and are neutral towards google scholar: compares consumers' and nutritionists' "functional views on functional foods google scholar: what do people think about functional "functional dairy products google scholar: summarises previous literature on "public demographic and other differences in google scholar: What influences uptake or rejection of "public reduced-fat foods google scholar: Demographic etc characteristics of "consumer view" functional food consumers google scholar: attitude towards functional foods can "consumer view" vary depending on the specific health google scholar: low awareness of functional foods as "consumer view" such, but awareness of individual foods google scholar: preference for functional foods over "consumer view" 'pills', and what kinds of functional google scholar: summary of current state of functional "consumer view" food market google scholar: What Korean dieticians think about "consumer view" functional foods. Searching for a what people at NRC know and think different article about functional foods Searching for a different article Searching for a older people's attitudes towards different article functional yogurts in Europe referred to in changes in US citizens' attitudes another article towards functional foods and what referred to in US knowledge and awareness of another article functional foods referred to in attitudes towards specific functional another article foods were more positive than towards referred to in what influences perceptions of another article functional foods referred to in what influences choice of functional another article foods referred to in what influences willingness to consume another article functional foods found while knowledge and attitude survey searching for google search people aren't keen on functional cheeses found this in how functional foods are developed library but it's FSA list FSA list FSA list European consumers want functional foods to assist them in reducing FSA list consumer attitudes to the metabolic syndrome, genetics in nutrition, and We review the potential for foods with enhanced health attributes based on referred to in summarises trends in demand 1996- another article 2000 From Refs section of From Refs section of From Refs section of sythetic biology public google Applications of sythetic biology scholar:syntheti sythetic biology public opinion/google Inclusion in Abstract Source full review? Although favorability of animal International Food No biotechnology still lags behind that of Information Council The Center for Food, Nutrition, and Center for Food, Nutrition Yes Agriculture Policy (CFNAP) at the and Agriculture Policy, As part of its research program Food Policy Institute. Yes examining public knowledge, attitudes Rutgers, the State The U.S. Food and Drug Administration KRC research - Yes is poised to release a risk assessment http://www.clonesafety.org The latest European sample survey of http://www.agbioforum.mis No public perceptions of biotechnology souri.edu/v3n23/v3n23a04- A recent survey of the Canadian public Nature Biotechnology, 18, Yes reveals a strong association between 943-4. Investigating the development in the Public Understanding of No Italian press of the public debate on Science, 9 Conventional wisdom judges the people Nature Biotechnology Yes of Animal cloning is an emerging FSA available Yes technology in the EU (although already at:http://www.food.gov.uk/ In this paper we are going to analyze British Library Inside - No the Spanish public opinion about the REVISTA INTERNACIONAL British Library Inside - No Journal Of Food Distribution British Library Inside - No Veterinary Record 2008 VOL http://www.gallup.com/poll No /6028/Cloning.aspx In the view of the authors of this report European Food Safety Yes converging lines of theoretical and Authority Danish Centre for Bioethcis Yes and Risk Assessment: The field of animal biotechnology has Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Yes been rapidly expanding and the Epiz., 24 (1) http://www.foe.org/pdf/FOE_Cl No oned_Food_Factsheet.pdf NA http://www.efsa.europa.eu/cs/ No BlobServer/DocumentSet/sc_op NA http://ec.europa.eu/european_ No group_ethics/activities/docs/opi NA http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/ Yes resources/docs/eurobarometer Using data from a national survey, this International Journal of Yes study analyses US consumers' Consumer Studies acceptance of genetically modified foods This report presents the results of the Food Policy Institute. No second Rutgers, the State This article summarizes the current Trends in Biotechnology No situation pertaining to modern Volume 19, Issue 2, 1 The landscape along farm roads at http://www.gallup.com/poll Yes harvest time today probably looks much /19261/Britons-Show- Nature Biotechnology Yes Labeling policies for genetically modified http://www.agbioforum.org No (GM) foods are under intense scrutiny /v3n4/v3n4a09- We elicit willingness-to-pay information http://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj Yes for similar food products that differ only /econjl/v114y2004i492p102- This study investigates the effect of http://erae.oxfordjournals.o No information about potential benefits of rg/cgi/content/abstract/31/ Perceptions of and attitudes toward http://www.informaworld.co No genetically engineered food and other m/smpp/content~content= Consumer food choice is framed in http://www.sciencedirect.co No terms of the formation of quality m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& The aim of this research is to determine http://journals.cambridge.o No whether people in the UK associate rg/action/displayAbstract;js The regulatory processes employed in http://www.sciencedirect.co No the UK and the European Union to m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& The safety assessment for marketing http://tpx.sagepub.com/cgi No purposes of genetically modified (GM) /content/abstract/30/1/129 Consumers are becoming more http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes conscious about the potentially negative m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& The aim of this research is, first, to http://www.emeraldinsight. No explore consumer beliefs, attitudes and com/Insight/viewContentIte Consumer acceptance of the application http://www.haworthpress.c No of new technologies to food processing om/store/ArticleAbstract.as This study identifies the nature, http://www.sciencedirect.co No strength and relative importance of m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& Results from a consumer survey http://www3.interscience.wi No comprising 400 face-to-face interviews ley.com/journal/102523255 Survey researches indicated that gene http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes technology applied to the food sector is m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& We use focus groups to gauge US http://www.agbioforum.mis No consumer reactions to alternative souri.edu/v5n1/v5n1a02- The political debate over genetically http://www.palgrave- No modified foods entered a new phase journals.com/jcb/journal/v1 Decreasing acceptance of http://www3.interscience.wi Yes biotechnologies over time has been ley.com/journal/118775232 This study examined behavior toward http://www3.interscience.wi No genetically modified (GM) food in a ley.com/journal/118562915 Public opposition to genetically modified http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/0xc1a No (GM) food and crops is widely a500d_0x0010f165 The results support the use of the http://www.emeraldinsight. No construct ―attitude toward GM foods‖ as com/Insight/ViewContentSe Information regarding the method of APPETITE No production of food products influences This article reports the findings of a one- Public Understanding of No year project examining British press Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, 5- data collected from a consumer survey JOURNAL OF No of face-to-face interviews to determine AGRICULTURAL to study the consumer acceptance of JOURNAL OF No genetically modified (GM) foods. AGRICULTURAL AND The goal of this research was to try a BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No new methodology to elicit consumers' The views of Hungarian consumers on Food Science and No food safety were investigated, with Technology The purpose of this paper is to examine British Library Inside - No how label information may affect the BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL The objective of this study was to BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No determine the level of acceptance by This study investigates why consumers Appetite vol 51 No accept different genetically modified Information has been proven to have JOURNAL OF No significant impacts on consumers' AGRICULTURAL AND This article seeks to engage with Sociology, 38, No contemporary debates on the social and Macnaughten, P. 2004 Political affiliation can play a key role in British Library Inside - . No shaping interest towards and emotions RISK MANAGEMENT - This study examined the factors that Food Quality and Preference No influence the risks and perceptions of Finnish students (N=3261) filled out a APPETITE No questionnaire on attitudes towards A questionnaire was used to determine British Food Journal No antecedents of attitudes towards foods This paper reports on a conjoint study FOOD QUALITY AND No of the influence of product (concept) PREFERENCE The objective of this study is to conduct APPETITE No a large in-depth face-to-face in house The purpose of this paper is to provide BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No insight into whether GM-labelling leads This project involved the organisation of http://randd.defra.gov.uk/D No a series of consultation workshops to ocument.aspx?Document=C This paper reports results from the first JOURNAL OF No large-scale, cross-Atlantic study to AGRICULTURAL This paper focuses on experiences from JOURNAL OF No a case study dealing with the Swiss AGRICULTURAL & This paper contributes to the literature FOOD POLICY Yes by bringing together the published Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) vegetables British Library Inside - No will likely be commercialized in India Review Of Agricultural Food safety is a concern for consumers, Journal of Food Safety No and a number of factors drive consumer This study examined how the provision Appetite Vol 50 No of information about regulatory What are the benefits of increasing the http://randd.defra.gov.uk/D Yes robustness of the GM food labelling ocument.aspx?Document=C Therefore, a survey of 604 consumers AGRICULTURAL No was conducted in Nairobi, Kenya, in ECONOMICS In this research, consumer images EUPHYTICA No regarding plant breeding technologies This research will investigate the ESRC Genomics newsletter No attitudes, intentions and practices of (http://www.genomicsnetw The purpose of this study is to AGRIBUSINESS No understand the impact of factors such In the past few years, much has been British Library Inside - RC33 No made of public opposition, in the UK sixth international Using a questionnaire based FOOD QUALITY AND No experimental design (n = 159) people's PREFERENCE No further information available but Food Australia No may be worth following up on The purpose of the research is to http://randd.defra.gov.uk/D No provide monetary estimates of the ocument.aspx?Document=C Linkages between consumer beliefs and British Library Inside - No attitudes regarding the risks and REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL This project investigated the attitudes, Unclear - located on Science No intentions and practices of farmers in Society website Resistance to importation of genetically British Library Inside - No modified (GM) foods in rich countries JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE Many countries have held back from BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No planting genetically modified (GM) food British Library Inside - L. No RISK MANAGEMENT - We analyze responses to a survey FOOD POLICY No designed to elicit consumer reaction to In this study we analyze consumer CANADIAN JOURNAL OF No surveys of GM food purchase propensity AGRICULTURAL Public opinion to genomics including GM Chapter from British Social No food (questions being repeated in BSA attitudes survey (Rachel) The purpose of the paper is to identify British Library Inside - No and describe differences in cognitive FOOD QUALITY AND Past research on attitudes towards GM APPETITE No food has focused on measuring explicit The research investigated how different Unclear - located on Science No research cultures in Britain and Sweden in Society website The purpose of this paper is to provide British Library Inside - No insight into how implicit measurements British Food Journal 2008 This paper examines Irish consumer FOOD QUALITY AND No acceptance of second-generation GM PREFERENCE This article looks at the results of two Journal of Food and No surveys, carried out in Hungary Nutrition Research Foods produced using emerging Food navigator article No nanotechnology are less likely to come supplied by Leatherhead. The Food Standards Agency COI Yes commissioned consumer research in There has been debate in the literature British Library Inside - ACTA No as to whether: (1) the risks and AGRICULTURAE The commercial success of genetically AGRIBUSINESS No modified (GM) food may be improved This study was carried out to Public Health Nutrition No investigate the factors that might help centres on whether consumers react to AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF No the process of gene technology or to the AGRICULTURAL AND This study aimed to investigate the BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No impact of information about traceability This review examines surveys into British Library Inside - Yes farmer attitudes for growing genetically AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE - This study sets out to assess public BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No awareness and perception of genetically Since the release of the first genetically JOURNAL OF FOOD No modified (GM) crop into the AGRICULTURE & Developing effective communication British Library Inside - No strategies to inform the public about PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING The aim of this paper is to report the ACTA ALIMENTARIA No results about Slovenian consumer's, The objective of this paper is to analyse British Library Inside - No consumers' attitudes and acceptability AGRICULTURAL The present study examines the factors FOOD QUALITY AND Yes that have influences upon benefit and PREFERENCE This study evaluates consumer AGRIBUSINESS No purchase propensity for genetically Presents the findings of the GM FSA Yes activities carried out in 2002/2003 and Note on the research related to above FSA Yes report Views of a random selection of the NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF No public were obtained for a hypothetical AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH present study investigates the structure APPETITE No of attitudes towards genetically OUTLOOK ON No AGRICULTURE In a survey of UK consumers, we JOURNAL OF No elicited their willingness to accept AGRICULTURAL AND a public opinion survey to measure the http://ec.europa.eu/public_ No opinions, attitudes and behaviour of opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_2 Report includes chapter on public http://www.cabinetoffice.go No opinion to GM foods v.uk/~/media/assets/www. This survey showed that the values Appetite Vol 45, No 1 p40- No power (dominance over nature and 46 This study examines people's Appetite Vol 45, No 1 p47- No acceptance of genetically modified (GM) 50 This study examines public perceptions AGRICULTURAL Yes of biotechnology, specifically the ECONOMICS We have taken a strategic look at the AEBC No issues and investigated the regulatory This project uses a national survey to ESRC No investigate the impacts upon public Examining the particular discourses of No the key players in the arena, from the A recent study by Lusk suggests that TRENDS in Biotechnology No consumers might Primarily outside the scientific Trends in Biotechnology No community, Genetic modification remains a Appetite No controversial issue. The aim of this This study analyzes predictors of South Food Policy Institute. No Korean public acceptance of the use of Rutgers, the State This paper considers public attitudes In Vitro Cellular & Yes toward genetically modified plants in Developmental Biology - Where significant scientific and social No uncertainty is involved in risk issues, Support for biotechnology in Japan is Nature Biotechnology, 18, No declining, although it remains higher 945-7. This survey on biotechnology and Eubios Journal of Asian and No bioethics was carried out on national International Bioethics The 1991-2002 Eurobarometer surveys Journal of No show a steady decline in optimism Agrobiotechnology This paper reports on one aspect of Public understanding of No qualitative research on public science This paper assumes that trust is a Public Understanding of No major issue in the interaction between Science This paper addresses the issue of public NOT A PRIORITY No perception of modern biotechnology in The agro-food industry is developing a Agribusiness No second generation of genetically Four questions on European consumers' Innovative Food Science & No attitudes to the use of genetic Emerging Technologies This study examines consumers' Journal of Agricultural and No willingness to consume different types Resource Economics The present study analyzes and THE JOURNAL OF No compares willingness to pay estimates CONSUMER AFFAIRS can't copy and paste Ital. J. Food Sci. No There is very strong support for BC Public Affairs No mandatory labelling of genetically No na Published by DTI Yes FSA No na LSE No This paper analyzes the study of the http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi No public perception of biotechnology, /content/abstract/9/4/383 Using results from the 1999 Risk Analysis No Eurobarometer survey and a parallel This article outlines the direction and American Behvioural No tenor of two distinct discourses on Scientist Through commercial application, Journal of food Science No biotechnology may improve health, Risk perceptions of a series of Risk Analysis No biotechnology applications were Arguments regarding the relationship http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi No between media discourse and public /content/abstract/14/3/305 Public familiarity with basic scientific http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/p No concepts and principles has been ublsoc2/8/ Using ‗general trust in institutions' and http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.o No ‗concepts of nature' as examples, the rg/cgi/content/full/19/2/191 The biotechnology controversy http://ajs.uwpress.org/cgi/c No highlights national differences in policy ontent/abstract/25/1/80 This study uses the contemporary http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.o No debate over agricultural biotechnology rg/cgi/content/abstract/19/ British Food Journal Yes Much has been written about the British Library Inside - No media's importance in the formation of JOURNAL OF PUBLIC This study investigates possible CANADIAN JOURNAL OF No marketing strategies for biotechnology AGRICULTURAL Despite being introduced more than a British Library Inside - No decade ago, agricultural biotechnology INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Based on a large-scale survey in 11 Journal of International No cities, this study employs probit and Food can't copy and paste UN Yes Biotechnology is often viewed as the Food Policy Institute, Yes defining technology for the future of Rutgers university Conjoint analysis is used to elicit Journal of Agricultural and No consumer preferences for attributes of Resource Economics This paper presents the preliminary ANZMAC 2000 Visionary No results of a conjoint study of 750 Marketing for the 21st The objective of this paper is to AgBioForum No estimate the consumer willingness to Significant ambivalence is found when Journal of Risk Research No examining the explanatory dimensions This study addresses which specific Appetite No values play a role in predicting can't copy and paste British Food Journal No Product descriptions of cheese, candy Food Quality and Preference No and salmon products were presented to na Centre for Research on Yes Customer Relations in the BNF Nutrition Bulletin No Agribusiness and Economics No Research Unit, Lincoln European consumers, in general, have Food quality and No negative attitudes towards the use of preference na GMO compass No na FSA No na FSA No na IFIC No na MORI No na Which? No This study was aimed at gaining a Journal of Consumer Policy No better understanding of the nature of Significant divergence exists in public Food Policy Institute, No opinions about biotechnology. Although Rutgers university In the growing body of literature AgBioForum No concerning consumer acceptance of na Amer. J. Agr. Econ No For a representative sample of US AgBioForum Yes consumers, we analyze ratings of na Appetite No Attempts to introduce GM foods in Bioprocess and Biosystems No Europe have prompted a major conflict Engineering can't copy and paste International Food and No Agribusiness Management The present study reports attitudes Appetite No towards genetically modified (GM) foods Research has shown that women are International Journal of No less accepting of Consumer Studies Using Fishbein's multiattribute model as Paper at American No a theoretical background, this paper Agricultural Economics Using Fishbein's multiattribute and Review of Agricultural No mediation models as conceptual Economics This study examines consumer Food Policy Institute, No willingness to consume genetically Rutgers university Recently, there has been a surge of Risk Analysis No interest in the role of feelings in framing The stated benefits and perceived risks AgBioForum Yes of genetic modification (GM) cover very A causal model explaining acceptance of Risk Analysis No gene technology was tested. It was A choice modeling approach was AgBioForum No used to identify consumer This paper reports results from a pilot Consumer Interests Annual No U.S. national telephone survey on We compare consumer valuations of Americal Journal of No beef ribeye steaks from cattle produced Agricultural Economics A research team from five European final report of PABE project No countries directed by Prof. Brian Wynne This paper reports a study of UK European Review of No consumer attitudes to genetically Agricultural Economics Journal of Consumer Policy No Empirical examinations of the ―social Risk Analysis No amplification of risk‖ framework are Recent research suggests that public Risk Analysis No attitudes toward emerging technologies This paper reports on one aspect of Public Understanding of No qualitative research on public Science The rapid globalization of the world Social Science & Medicine No economy has increased the need for an Little is known about the role and The Journal of Socio- No mechanisms through which the press Economics This paper investigates Willingness to International Journal of No Accept (WTA) Genetic Modification (GM) Biotechnology The predictive validity of implicit and British Journal of Social No explicit attitudes is a central question in Psychology The field of animal biotechnology has Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz No been rapidly expanding and the Much has been written about risk Journal of Risk Research No perceptions and public understanding of In this paper we study the differences in No European public opinion and consumer The research presented here examines International Journal of No the hypothesis that the most effective Biotechnology Public attitudes toward biotechnology in Journal of Biotechnology No the European Union have been Surveys eliciting opinions about AgBioForum No biotechnology applications suggest the na University of East Anglia Yes na IFIC No Recent research indicates that the International Journal of Yes majority of respondents in nineteen of Food Science and na Nuffield Council on Bioethics No can't copy and paste Minerva Biotec No Issues such as BSE, MMR vaccination, NCC No rail accidents, mobile phone safety, GM http://ec.europa.eu/research/p Yes ress/2006/pdf/pr1906_eb_64_3 In this memo, we highlight the findings http://www.pewtrusts.org/u Yes of our polls conducted for PIFB from ploadedFiles/wwwpewtrusts With concerns about food security http://www.igd.com/index.a Yes bringing GM back into the headlines in sp?id=1&fid=1&sid=8&tid= In 10 EU countries, surveys were http://www.whybiotech.com Yes undertaken and retailers consulted to /resources/tps/DoConsumer The structure and predictive ability of Appetite No social representation of new foods were The objectives of this study were to JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY Yes evaluate consumer attitudes regarding the safety of the food supply, relate Conjoint analytic surveys were INNOVATIVE FOOD Yes administered to 225 potential SCIENCE & EMERGING consumers of foods processed by TECHNOLOGIES can't copy and paste International Food Economy Yes Research Group, Uni. Of Guelph Determinants of consumer adoption of Appetite Yes innovations have been studied from different angles and from the Consumers' attitudes have been shown http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes to influence and predict behaviour. This m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& review highlights the diverse consumer a Eighty-eight consumers participated in _udi=B6VHY-49YD20G- http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes blind pre-test in which they rated their m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& The increasing demand for healthy and http://www.sciencedirect.co No nutritious products as a consequence of m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& Consumers may encounter a number of http://www.emeraldinsight. Yes potential food hazards through their com/Insight/viewContentIte There is substantial empirical evidence http://www3.interscience.wi No that both trust and risk perceptions ley.com/journal/118908495 The research reported here aims to http://www.informaworld.co No understand how people react to m/smpp/content~content= Consumers' fears of novel food http://www.sciencedirect.co No technologies are documented. The m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& This paper builds upon a review of British Library Inside - No relevant marketing, consumer science TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE FSA library Author: PHILO, No GREGORY Company: Media British Food Journal (BFJ) Yes The acceptance of a technology INNOVATIVE FOOD No depends on the consumer's perception SCIENCE & EMERGING The report's main focus is on the Foresight No methods for debating on new Highlights certain dimensions of public Paul Slovic and others No risk perception that are pertintent to can't copy and paste APPETITE No TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE No & TECHNOLOGY British Library Inside - No Stratton, J. Serrano, E. FOOD QUALITY AND Yes PREFERENCE Abstract: Purpose – Consumers are British Library Inside - No sometimes unexpectedly resistant EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF To assess the acceptance of novel food FOOD QUALITY AND Yes technologies, the Repertory Grid Method PREFERENCE British Library Inside - No INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL British Library Inside - No Trends In Food Science And New Zealand's 'Navigator Network' is a British Library Inside - No national scanning network of scientists Technology Analysis & Consumers' attitudes have been shown http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes to influence and predict behaviour. This m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& can't copy and paste Journal of Food Engineering Yes An innovation's success is dependent Innovation: Management, Yes upon successfully responding to Policy & Practice na Google books No Factors that influence public acceptance Trends in Food Science & Yes of innovative technologies and products Technology As part of an EU-funded research Journal of Food, Agriculture Yes project, a representative survey of & Environment The book begins with a comprehensive http://www.woodheadpublishi No introduction and analysis of the key ng.com/en/book.aspx?bookID= The objective of this study was to Journal of Dairy Science No determine the degree of liking of ultra- This paper presents the results of Paper prepared for Yes experimental auctions of the orange presentation at the Consumer acceptability of three Journal of Food Quality No commercial scrambled egg patty This project evaluates the attitudes of Journal of Food Science No food and health professionals to 3 new Education This study investigated the impact of International Food Yes different manufacturing processes, Information Service Experimental auctions were used to http://www.springerlink.co No examine the effects of alternative m/content/jq0h883t14q377 The public must decide between http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes assertions made about food safety m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& na http://agecon.tamu.edu/fac No ulty/nayga/AiewNaygaNicho Studies indicate that consumers who http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele No receive even minimal presentation on =afficheN&cpsidt=1738622 In this study, a survey was prepared to JOURNAL OF FOOD Yes receive opinion of Turkish People living AGRICULTURE & This article reviews data from surveys http://www.agmanager.info No and retail experiments that examine the /livestock/marketing/bulleti na http://origin.cdc.gov/enteric Yes s/publications/65_frenzen20 A survey was conducted to determine http://www.cababstractsplu Yes current consumer attitudes toward s.org/google/abstract.asp?A Consumers are questioning the ability of http://www.sciencedirect.co No the modern food system to provide safe m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& Food safety has become a major issue http://www.ingentaconnect. No of public concern, encouraging the UK com/content/mcb/070/2001 Recent studies of consumer attitudes in http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes the United States indicate an increased m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& British Library Inside - No JOURNAL OF FOOD British Library Inside - No JOURNAL OF FOOD The study develops an empirical model Journal of International No to estimate the likelihood of consumers' Food and Agribusiness JOURNAL OF NUTRITION No EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR The risk of foodborne illness can be British Library Inside - No reduced significantly by irradiation of FOOD PROTECTION FOOD SCIENCE AND Yes TECHNOLOGY Irradiationoffreshmeattocontrolmicrobial JOURNAL OF FOOD No pathogensreceivedapprovalfromthefeder PROTECTION http://www.sbes.stir.ac.uk/ Yes research/projects/ceser/Con na Journal of Food Distribution Yes Research Studies were carried out to assess ? No consumer attitude towards food na Interdisciplinary Food Yes Safety Research Irradiation of meat, poultry, and other Food Service Technology No foods helps to preserve food quality and This study examines consumer http://ecsocman.edu.ru/ima No willingness to pay for irradiated beef ges/pubs/2003/11/29/0000 A censored negative binomial regression Journal of Food Distribution No model was used to study the Research In December 1997, the US Food and International Journal of Yes Drug Administration approved the use Consumer Studies Sensory characteristics and consumer Journal of Food Processing No acceptance of electron-beam irradiated & Preservation This study aimed at evaluating the Radiation Physics and No acceptance of MP watermelon and Chemistry na Journal of Food Distribution Yes Rese Inconsistency between consumers' Journal of Food Products No actual purchase and their intentions to Marketing The public must decide between Food Policy No assertions made about food safety This study uses a quasi-experimental Science Communication No design to assess the impact of pro- and Food manufacturers in the United Journal of Food Protection Yes States are currently allowed to irradiate This study assessed the effect of Review of Agricultural No information related to the food Economics can't copy and paste ? No The use of irradiation to improve the Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. Yes safety, protect the nutritional benefits, In general, people in the developed Pierce Law Review No world have access to a safe and varied na Food Commission No The technical approach assumes that http://www3.interscience.wi Yes risk assessments made by technical ley.com/journal/118899458 consumer study of irradiated ground Food Protection Trends No beef was conducted in Manhattan, A survey on beliefs and purchase intent Journal of Food Processing No of irradiated foods was conducted and Preservation Scientists and advocates can disagree Department of Economics No on the value of new products or and Finance, University of The 1991-2002 Eurobarometer surveys http://www.agbioforum.mis No show a steady decline in optimism souri.edu/v6n12/v6n12a12- In this study, I examine whether http://scx.sagepub.com/cgi No Americans' emotions and opinions about /content/abstract/27/2/221 Public perceptions of emergent http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi No technologies have become increasingly /content/abstract/15/2/221 Nanomaterials are now being http://www.informaworld.co No manufactured and used in many m/smpp/content~content= Previous studies on public attitudes http://scx.sagepub.com/cgi Yes toward emerging technologies have /content/abstract/27/2/240 How do the risks and benefits of http://www.nature.com/nna No nanotechnology, as viewed by the no/journal/v1/n3/abs/nnano A January 2005 telephone survey of http://www.springerlink.co Yes 1200 people in the U.S. and 2000 m/content/ch3p5538532687 A comparison between two recent http://www.nature.com/nna No national surveys among nanoscientists no/journal/v2/n12/abs/nna http://www.nature.com/nm No at/journal/v3/n8/full/nmat1 Despite knowing little about http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3 Yes nanotechnology (so to speak), members /papers.cfm?abstract_id=96 na http://www.sciencedirect.co No m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& Nanotechnology is expected to be the http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/x No key technology of the 21st century. pl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber http://scholar.google.co.uk/ No scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=info:l na http://www.sciencedirect.co No m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& Public perception of nanotechnology http://www3.interscience.wi No may influence the realization of ley.com/journal/118486453 Nanotechnology is an emerging http://www.azonano.com/D No technology which has already begun to etails.asp?ArticleID=1468 na http://www.azonano.com/D Yes etails.asp?ArticleID=1396 Scientific knowledge has not stabilized http://www.springerlink.co No in the current, early, phase of research m/content/9753275h6q742 Although proposed nanotechnology http://www3.interscience.wi No applications hold great promise, little is ley.com/journal/120124428 na http://dspace.lincoln.ac.nz/ Yes dspace/bitstream/10182/12 British Library Inside - . No Individual perspectives, involve Yes British Library Inside - Yes BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL http://www.nanologue.net/ Yes Demos Yes Royal Society: Yes http://www.nanotec.org.uk/ http://www.wtec.org/SocietalI No mplications/2/si2vii_report.pdf Public awareness and governmental British Library Inside - No involvement in overseeing the JOURNAL OF CLEANER Prepared by BMRB Social No Research for The Royal Friends of the Earth No Dialogue alert from Defra Yes library circulated by Sandy British Library Inside - No JOURNAL OF CLEANER The public perception Nat Nanotechnol. 2007 Feb No of nanotechnology will have a major ;2 (2):67 18654213 The perceptions of untrained consumers Appetite Yes towards nanotechnology foods and food Volume 49, Issue 2, ETC No This paper compares public perceptions Public Understanding of No of technologies in the United States Science Civil soc project sponsored Yes by eg The Guardian, NA smalltalk.org Yes http://www.nature.com/nature No /journal/v437/n7058/full/43745 http://www.nanotechproject Yes .org/process/assets/files/59 http://www.nanotechproject No .org/process/assets/files/59 The key to understanding public http://www.nanotechproject No response to nanotechnology is not to be .org/process/assets/files/59 Despite the forecast of a bright future http://www.sciencedirect.co Yes for functional foods, which constitute m/science?_ob=ArticleURL& The objective of this study is to identify BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL No the optimal product design attributes CANADIAN JOURNAL OF No AGRICULTURAL Appetite No CANADIAN JOURNAL OF No AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL OF FOOD No SCIENCE FOOD QUALITY AND Yes PREFERENCE British Library Inside - No NUTRITION AND FOOD Food Quality and Preference No British Library Inside - ASIA No PACIFIC FOOD INDUSTRY British Library Inside - ASIA No PACIFIC FOOD INDUSTRY FOOD QUALITY AND Yes PREFERENCE Prepared Foods No APPETITE No APPETITE No APPETITE No This study was an assessment of the British Library Inside - No knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported TOPICS IN CLINICAL British Library Inside - No APPETITE - LONDON- 2008 British Library Inside - S. No FOOD QUALITY AND http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrd No er.do?UIN=224277901&ETOC=R Beef Products Inc. (BPI), Dakota Dunes, National Provisioner No SD, the world's leading manufacturer of http://www.allbusiness.com Food Quality and Preference Yes British Library Inside - No FOOD TECHNOLOGY - FOOD QUALITY AND No PREFERENCE Appetite (British Library Yes Inside - APPETITE – The goal of the present study was to Appetite. 2008 Apr 8; : Yes examine factors that influence 18479781 (P,S,E,B,D) [My No info yet. British Library Inside - No FOOD SCIENCE AND The aim of the present study was to BRITISH JOURNAL OF Yes survey attitudes to and use of functional NUTRITION We asked participants (n = 390) to rate APPETITE No pictures of products with either added The potential market for functional British Library Inside - No wines was explored in a study which FOOD QUALITY AND Objective To examine the perceived Journal of the American No knowledge and attitudes of dietitians Dietetic Association The agro-food industry is developing a Agribusiness No second generation of genetically Very few economic analyses have been Canadian Journal of No done about functional foods and Agricultural Economics This study examines consumers' Journal of Agricultural and No willingness to consume different types Resource Economics Using data from a national survey, this International Journal of No study analyses US consumers' Consumer Studies can't copy and paste Ital. J. Food Sci. No As concepts in nutrition move towards Nutrition Bulletin Yes emphasising the use of foods to The aim of this study was to investigate International Journal of No consumer perception and sensory Consumer Studies In the past, it has been assumed that British Food Journal No consumers would accept novel foods if can't copy and paste International Journal of No Consumer Studies Functional foods and/or supplements No British Journal of Nutrition may be used in the context of a healthy Adult US subjects (n=78) tasted and Food Quality and Preference Yes rated three juice samples containing 0, The link between what people eat and Journal of Nutraceuticals, No susceptibility to disease is well known. Functional & Medical Foods Little published research to date Journal of Nutraceuticals, No appears to have considered the Functional & Medical Foods It was mainly the advances in Appetite No understanding the relationship between The object of this study was to examine Journal of Food Science and No attitudes and knowledge of Korean Nutrition can't copy and paste Journal of Applied Sciences No Research Consumers' perceptions of conventional Food Quality and Preference No (regular plain yogurt, low-calorie and Purpose – The aim of this study is to British Food Journal Yes investigate older people's perceptions, na IFIC Yes na IFIC No http://www.inomics.com/cgi/repec?han RePEc Yes dle=RePEc:hhb:aarmap:0062 Functional foods presumably enable the Appetite No consumer to lead a healthier life without The aim of this study was to examine Nutrition & Food Science No what reasons consumers give for either So-called functional foods are a new Food quality and No category of products that promise preference na IFIC Yes An unhealthy image for cheese in the DairyReporter.com - No UK threatens to prevent many varieties Breaking News on Dairy Functional food development involves Food Science and No several distinct stages Technology Using a survey, this study investigated JOURNAL OF CEREAL Yes public perceptions relating to different SCIENCE Nutrigenomics is the study of genetic Trends in Food Science and No material to understand how metabolic Technology The market for functional foods is Dr. Barbara Stewart-Knox, No increasing year on year and data was Nutrition society summer BNF Nutrition Bulletin No TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE No & TECHNOLOGY na AgBioForum No Concern regarding the relationship Spanish Journal of No between diet and health is growing Agricultural Research The aim of this study was to investigate Appetite No some Swedish dieticians', registered Royal Society/experts and Yes the public Rathenau Institute working Yes paper ETC (pressure group) Yes We describe the results of a study to Yale Law School Yes determine the synthetic-biology risk (unpub;lished?) Synthetic biologists engineer complex http://www.nature.com/msb/jo Yes artificial biological systems to urnal/v2/n1/full/msb4100073.h http://www.nature.com/em No bor/journal/v9/n9/full/embo Is synthetic biology amenable to American Political Science Yes existing European governance association structures? Synthetic biology is an
Pages to are hidden for
"emergingfoodtech"Please download to view full document