text:
The Grand Old Jurassic Party
The Republican Party is a presidential election away from extinction. If it can't win the 2016 contest, and unless it has bolstered its congressional presence beyond the benefits of gerrymandered redistricting—which is to say not only retaking the Senate but polling more votes than the opposition nationally—the party will die. It will die not for reasons of "branding" or marketing or electoral cosmetics but because the party is at odds with the inevitable American trajectory in the direction of liberty, and with its own nature; paradoxically the party of Abraham Lincoln, which once saved the Union and which gives such passionate lip service to constitutionality, has come to embody the values of the Confederacy in its hostility to constitutional federalism and the civil bonds that the founding document codifies. The Republican Party will vanish not because of what its says but because of what it believes, not because of how it presents itself but because of who it is when it thinks no one is looking.
The contention by some that the GOP has an identity crisis is nonsense. It's hard to remember any political organization in the last half century that had a clearer idea of itself. The party's problem isn't what it doesn't know but what everyone else does know, which is that—as displayed in Congress on Tuesday night at the president's State of the Union address, when Republicans could barely muster perfunctory support for the most benign positions favoring fair pay and opposing domestic violence—the party apparently despises women, gays, Latinos, African Americans, the poor, and the old. The more indelible this impression becomes, the more impossible it will be for even an estimable candidate, be it Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, or the now famously desiccated Marco Rubio, to transcend the party that nominates him. This isn't to say that the argument for limited government will die with the party. It has been part of the American conversation since James Madison and Alexander Hamilton squared off over the Constitution in 1789. The intent of the argument, however, has changed from an essential advocacy of freedom to retribution against the weak.
The Republican Party was born of the most righteous of purposes, which was the containment and eventual elimination of slavery. Trumping the party's love of the free market was the insistence that a human being should not be one of that market's commodities: FREE LABOR, FREE LAND, FREE MEN was the party's manifesto in the 1850s. Four decades after Lincoln, the party under Theodore Roosevelt believed that the captains, colonels, and generals of industry who most profited from the market had become the market's biggest threat and needed to be constrained for the market's sake. In the 1960s the candidacy of Barry Goldwater represented not the birth of modern corporate conservatism as later embodied by President Ronald Reagan and then Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, and Eric Cantor, but a libertarianism more practical and less unhinged than the present-day version. Sometime in the last 30 years, however, the party became a flack to corporate culture at the expense of either freedom or individualism, and as the country grows more economically oligarchic, the Republican Party that best reflects that oligarchy loses political credibility with the public.
What the current party shares in its collective psychosis with the party of the '60s is its yearning for martyrdom. If it's true that what hold on power the GOP still has lies in congressional districts more and more resembling outliers—a power that will die off as figuratively as the constituents of those districts die off literally—it's also true that many in the party are gripped by the death wish that thrills all martyrs and leaves them moist for self-annihilation. These Republicans have a different notion from other modern political parties of what a party is supposed to be. They don't see a party as a coalition of disparate interests having just enough in common that together everyone gets what they need, if not what they want. Republicans believe that, definitionally, a party signifies principles so unyielding that any compromise of anything at all renders the party meaningless. Nothing better indicates the theocratic personality of the party than that the very notion of coalition is corrupt, even debased, like a congregation that allows infidels in its ranks. In the last couple of weeks a national poll reported that by three to two, Democrats are willing to compromise on certain things in order to achieve other, larger things. Among Republicans, the numbers are exactly the reverse. It's not unreasonable that true believers conclude Karl Rove—as responsible as any single person for what the party has become—is now a hack, given that he is one and always has been, and given what for true believers is the rather belated revelation that Rove loves power for its own sake which, whatever else may be so, can't be said of the party's zealots.
Self cannibalization is the instinct of such movements. The more desperate the Republican Party becomes, the more voraciously it devours its Robespierres, Dantons, Héberts, if such comparisons don't unduly flatter the romantic delusions of self-styled Republican Jacobins. Thus Senator Rubio's superstardom is already on the descent, so blemished by his flirtations with reality not to mention with compassion on the matter of immigration reform that not only did he back away from the issue in his response to the president on Tuesday but it was necessary for Kentucky Senator Rand Paul to offer another, purer response to Rubio's tainted one. Thus the face of Hispanic Republicanism, however far beyond the oxymoronic such a concept lurches, isn't Rubio on Tuesday night but Tuesday afternoon's new hotshot Ted Cruz, senator from Texas for 43 days and attacking the character of Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel so ruthlessly and without any facts that even fellow Hagel opponent John McCain objected. Thus the scowling response of congressional Republicans Tuesday night to the president's clarion call on behalf of voting rights, which was last regarded as controversial 50 years ago by Southern segregationists and might have been considered in 2013 something of a gimme as far as applause lines go. Thus on further review the videotape reveals Speaker John Boehner—who initially stood with the rest of the country to applaud the victims of gun violence during the State of the Union's concluding litany—looking out nervously at his seething and largely unmoved caucus (which leads him far more than he leads them) and, realizing the error of his heart, taking his seat again halfway through the honor roll of the dead, by the time the president got to Tucson.
Thu, 2013-02-14 09:29
I do not think this party started with the noblest of purposes either. Lincoln may have wanted to free the slaves, but his disregard for Native Americans is something that is not talked about with his command to execute the Dakota 38 in Minnesota. Free land came at the expense of forced removals of Native Americans. The hold up of the Violence Against Women Act came because Republicans did not think Native women deserved the same protections as any other woman. Their disregard for minorities includes Native Americans, something that we should never forget as Native peoples have been forgotten throughout American history. Otherwise, fantastic article!
Thu, 2013-02-14 17:17
Fri, 2013-02-15 11:42
I thought it was GAY partners that do not deserve protection from abusive partners! And UNMARRIED straight partners too, of course.
The white-vs-Native question is a matter of reservation vs state having jurisdiction, and tribal government allegedly not having jurisdiction over whites who move onto tribal land (to marry or live with Native women and abuse them). Tribal jurisdiction is confusing anyway: if someone is caught cheating in the Seminole casino in Tampa, FL, do the tribal police have authority to arrest them, even if (like 99 percent of the crowd) they are not Seminoles? Of course, you commit a crime in their territory, you are subject to their laws. For convenience sake, they will probably turn the suspect over to Florida authorities, since fraud is a crime under both tribal and state law, but they COULD try the suspect on the reservation and impose their sentence. Yet Republicans do not want that to apply to domestic violence by a non-Native against a Native, living together on tribal land.
As for Lincoln, in the 1850's and 1860's white politicians of all kinds were oblivious to Native American needs and rights. Today's Democratic party values the rights of minorities in general, so they added this protection to the bill; today's Republican party dismisses the HUMAN rights of everyone except affluent straight "Christian" people, except when talking TO other people (they try to appeal to African-Americans by using a rich African-American as their mouthpiece, to Latinos with a rich Latino, to women with a Stepford wife, etc.), so that just gives them one MORE excuse to oppose protection of women against violence (unless they are Christian Stepford wives, who of course would NEVER be abused).
Fri, 2013-02-15 13:28
It should be remembered that 303 Sioux prisoners were convicted of murder and rape by military tribunals and sentenced to death. Of that group, and at great political risk, Lincoln commuted the death sentences of 264 of the condemned Sioux prisoners. I hardly think that reviewing the tribunal's decison and finding reasons to save the lives of 87% of the men condemned to death is "disregard." Yes, the history of the United States is filled with injustice to the Native American people, but Abraham Lincoln can hardly be blamed for that fact and his record regarding Native Americans is far better than most U.S. presidents.
Thu, 2013-02-14 09:46
These Scotchosauruses don't even realize they've already backed themselves so far into an ideological tar pit that there is no escape. It's too late for a makeover, and too late to all of the sudden start sounding human and pretending to care about anything other than their own pockets and their own agenda. No one is buying the bullshit anymore that would do nothing but send us back about 70 years. And sorry, but if they think that Marco Rubio will lock-up the Latino vote just because he speaks Spanish, then they lead a richer fantasy life than I do.
Thu, 2013-02-14 14:29
I would not prepare the headstone for the GOP just yet,,,most of what's said here could have been said about the Democratic Party after the election of Bush Sr...there's nothing more dangerous than a wounded animal and I predict the Republicans will be back with a vengence,,in spite of the attempts to "talk up the economy", the truth is the economic situation here and abroad do not favor the Democrats. Absent SIGNIFICANT economic recovery this year it will be difficult to continue to blame the Republicans for the malaise. The Democrats need a better game plan than "McGovern on Steroids" if their going to continue to be successful. As a registered Independent I guess it's obvious that I'm not impressed with either party right now,,sadly not much substance coming from either side, in which case i will sit back and wait for true signs of leadership,,,,,,
Thu, 2013-02-14 14:48
I think the Republican party is in bad shape but the sad part is that the Democrats are in bad shape as well. Politically the Democrats are winning but that is because they are more consistent in the arguments for expanded government and destroying individual freedom. The Republicans say they want small govenrment, but they expand the size, typically more than the Democrats.
However, Obama has taken the Democrats far beyond what the more recent 'liberals' (inaccurate term as liberal means free and the Democrats are more about enslaving the population in statism... Statist is the proper term for the Democrats) have done. Understand that if the Republican party falls into oblivion, there won't be an opposition party to blame. Then the Democrats will begin the viscious self destructive cycle of blaming the various factions and leaders for the results of their time proven failed policies. This will be similar to how it went in the USSR. Lenin started the revolution but his socialist policies (NEP) left the economy a disaster. So after the violent behind the scenes revolution by Stalin the USSR got a new economic plan and blammed his predesessor for all of the countries woes (sound familiar?). Let's not forget some blame to the capitalists that were always intruding in the USSRs affairs. Plenty of blame will come from the Democratic dictators all the while the lives of millions of Americans are destroyed.
So the Republican party may be on deaths door (I hope not but they are there by their own contradictions) but America is also on death's door by following the ideologies of two parties that promote statism over individualism. So if you read this you should ask yourself, what kind of a country was produced by charismatic statists? History is full of them... Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Castro, Mao... need to think more about it? Keep thinking because you won't find a 'good' one if you value your life as worth living. They were all terrible as will be the American version. The small government Tea Party has but a few good ideas in the strive toward limited government. If you have an iota of self respect you will work to support the Tea Party and keep it on a broad coalition of small government citizens. Just people who want to be free... period. If not, then sit back and watch the end of America, because it isn't far away. The odds are that it will parish with the party that is currently 'winning'! Forward America and don't forget 'yes YOU did'.
Thu, 2013-02-14 23:48
Lenin started the NEP because his policies from the revolution were failing, he understood this, and he tried to inject a measure of capitalism into the economy to get it going. It didn't work very well but Lenin died before it had much of a chance. Stalin then reversed the NEP and instituted measures such as forced collectivization. Say of them what you will, but the NEP was the exact opposite of what you say it was. Also Stalin never blamed Lenin for anything. He blamed the ravages of the Civil War of 1918-19 but never Lenin.
As for the rest of your post, the Tea Party will be judged as you have judged Lenin here -- on the basis of what was the outcome of their efforts. In 2012, if Romney had won, we would have seen an ENORMOUS expansion of the military budget (Romney promised it) with far deeper deficits than Obama has rung up., accompanied by further tax cuts which would have made the situation even worse. And since I hardly think one can say that the Tea Party wanted Obama to win, one must conclude that they were trying to elect somebody who would have done exactly the opposite of what they said they stood for.
If the Tea Party would cease acting as a Trojan Horse for rich people whose only interest in life is paying lower taxes, it might get some traction. Of course, once it does that, it's funding will dry up.
Unless you, too, are a Trojan Horse for rich people, you have no viable political options at this time.
Mo Freedom
Thu, 2013-02-14 14:58
If the GOP dies, it will be because our nation died from debt overload.
It won't be long before those affected by our debt problems wake up to the fact that what's going on is not in their best interests, especially young people & people with aspirations of upward mobility.
But Democrats will always be able to count on the votes of those on the bottom & top rungs of the socioeconomic ladder. The folks on the bottom rungs aren't going anywhere under Democrat policies. And those at the top understand how to benefit from government largesse (a.k.a., cronyism)
Mon, 2013-02-18 12:50
Debt overload. When did that occur. Oh year the Bush years. 10 trillion added to the debt and counting.
Far as those at the bottom of the rung and the people who depend the most on government. Most of those people live in Red states.
That 47% Romney was talking about. A majority of those are white Republicans.
Far as the middle class doing better under Democrat policies. You would hate to know the entire country does better under the Democrats.
The economy. The stock market. You name it. The entire country does better under Democrats.
How do you guys forget that you voted for Bush. He came in with a surplus and left us with 10 trillion of debt and 15 million people losing their jobs.
That sure helped the Middle class. You people are insane and devoid of facts.
If your really worried about the debt let everyone who voted for a certain president pay off the debt he leaves.
Bush's bill is at 10 trillion. 60 million of you idiots voted for him. your bill for voting for Bush wold be 160,000 for every idiot that voted for him.
If your really worried about the debt I'm sure you and your fellow Republicans would submit the certified check to pay off Bush's 10 trillion dollar bill.
We won't hold our breath.
Thu, 2013-02-14 18:01
The Republican Party is going to eventually split in two, and none too soon. The best single thing that can happen to the GOP is for its Sarah Palin/Sean Hannity fringe to split off and form their own ultra right-wing fringe party. Then what remains of the the GOP can then move back to the center and start winning elections again. They'll pick up two moderate voters in the center for every far right-wing nutjob that they lose.
Most voters agree in principle with Republicans on most issues, but the hatefullness and spite of the far right scares many people away from voting for them. If the "Tea Party" purists hadn't succeeded in nominating totally unelectable candidates in states like Delaware and Nevada, it's quite possible that the GOP would control the Senate today.
Thu, 2013-02-14 18:35
American's seem pretty comfortable with the GOP compared to the tax and spend Democratsif you look at the facts.
53% of Americans, 165 million, chose to give total control of their state to the GOP by electing a Republican governor and giving both chambers of their state legislatures Red majorities.
Only 37% of Americans, 103 million, voted to give total control tax and spend Democrats in their states.
The Republicans just won their largest back-to-back majorities in the House of Representatives since the 1940's.
President Obama is the first incumbent in 75 years to win reelection with fewer votes than he won in his first election.
The facts just don't support Steve's argument, but something tells me Mr. Erickson never lets facts get in the way of a good fantasy.
Thu, 2013-02-14 19:50
Thu, 2013-02-14 23:16
In the context of SOTU, I think the thoughts in your article are really interesting. Obama's speech was filled with pragmatic ideas for solving problems, shorn of ideology. Even if you believe that his solutions reflect an ideology, the arguments he made for them did not base itself on such things. Instead he put all his arguments in terms of what is practical and makes common sense. The contrast with Rubio could not have been more vivid. He simply gave a philosophical argument against government and taxes and ignored the detailed proposals and their rationale. Then having given his argument against Obama, he tried to take it back by talking about how he believes in Medicare and government loans for education, sensing that his arguments could put his party in deep trouble with ordinary Americans. The Republicans are boxing themselves into an ideological corner from which it will be difficult to avoid decline and some of them sort of know it. However, I think the Democrats need a good recovery for the economy in order to make the most of these possibilities. If it comes by 2016, then perhaps that election can be decisive. However, I don't see the Republicans zealots walking out unless the power of more moderate elements in the party grows and starts to push them aside. If the zealots keep the power they have, the moderates are more likely to want to walk out. But walk out to what? A moderate 3rd party? Such a party would not be very far from the position Obama has already staked out, so why not join the Democrats, like some (Christie, for example) already have. If the Republican party does diminish and the Democratic party becomes a home for moderates, then the more moderate splits in the country will show themselves as battles within the Democratic party. Of course, such battles already exist, but they will likely grow more pronounced. Perhaps eventually it will be the Democratic party that splits as the Republican party withers away - a possible alternative to your scenario.
Ken Presting
Fri, 2013-02-15 08:56
This article is valuable, but I don't agree that the present GOP understands it own identity, or that it's really an ideological movement. I do credit Erickson for at least mentioning the plutocrats who fund the party. But that should be the main line, not the French Revolution comparisons which he belabors.
The real story is that the GOP is hardly a political party at all now. It's nothing but a front organization for those plutocrats. They collect barely enough votes to get their operatives into elected office, then enact policies which have little or nothing to do with the interests of their voters. Hedrick Smith and Bill Moyers have each documented the problem, and traced it to the Lewis Powell memo of the 1970s.
All of us who want to see the end of this style of politics must remember that all the money is still out there, ready to buy a new crop of politicians. What will matter when the GOP dies is, will we have a window of opportunity to get money out of politics?
Fri, 2013-02-15 11:27
The thesis of this article is stupid. During the FDR-Truman era, the GOP lost 5 elections in a row. The Democrats lost three in a row during the Reagan-Bush years. Both parties are still around. The regionalization of a party doesn't equal its demise. As a matter of fact, it tends to portend an eventual willingness to compromise. After such a silly misreading of the GOPs situation, its hard to take the rest of the article as anything more than the cries of Cassandra.
bob h
Fri, 2013-02-15 11:29
I think the idea that a loss in 2016 probably spells extinction is correct, because the Democrat will surrender power in 2024 in a nation that has evolved even further away from the GOP. In a Darwinian struggle for survival, the inability to adapt to a changing environment spells extinction, by definition. For 2016 we have jejune lightweights like Rubio, Paul, Ryan, and a vulgar loudmouth, Christie going against a heavyweight, Clinton.
Fri, 2013-02-15 11:35
The window of opportunity to get money out of politics - is begin now or it will be forever too late. The Republican party (currently a solid front for the plutocrats) is still very flush with funds and plutocrats currently have control of the major portion of the media. "Faux News" is a major contributor to misinformation in its most egregious form and our current Supreme Court is NOT going to help us. We must engage this fight and keep on it until we have a more sensible and democratic way of funding elections - and I do mean ALL elections. We have to build an opposition to the plutocrats locally as well as nationally, because the Democratic Party is as vulnerable to their incursions as the Republican Party is, and we cannot regain control of government institutions like the FDA and USDA without getting control of election funding For The People.
Fri, 2013-02-15 11:39
The GOP will never die so long as it supports the interests of very large wealth concentrations. Americans are so poorly equipped with economic facts and correct impressions that, if the GOP was willing to take a real political risk, setting off megabankers against the rest of the corporate world, it could revive the Civil War REPUBLICAN idea of creating money without debt, greenbacks, and having a large program of government grants to subsidize PRIVATE individual entrepreneurs and PRIVATE small businesses for NEW HIRES in the PRIVATE SECTOR. They'd have to overcome banker screaming "hyperinflation," but that's just a TABOO. American voters are passive and malleable. They accepted Nixon going to China, they'd accept this as well and republicans would steal victory from the jaws of defeat.
Fri, 2013-02-15 11:53
The Republican party will last, in some form, as long as the wealthy who ACTUALLY benefit from its ideology (and do not realize that it will eventually hurt them too, when air, water and food become too poisoned for the best medical care in the world to overcome) can continue to brainwash the millions who DO NOT benefit into ideological purity by misappropriating religion and capitalist theory which is NOT borne out by the facts.
They oppose public policies that would help more people get better medical care and education, but mainly MENTAL HEALTH care and CRITICAL THINKING EDUCATION, since that would make their base voters harder to brainwash.
As Stephen Colbert once said, "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."
Fri, 2013-02-15 13:15
Great article, I do realize that you were being allegorical and realize that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were not at the Constitutional Convention (at the time they were in Great Britain and France as ambassadors, respectively).
However, it must be pointed out that while Hamilton and Adams were both eventually members of the Federalist party, Adams despised Hamilton and in no way could Hamilton be described as Adam's protégé.
Otherwise it was an excellent article.
Fri, 2013-02-15 13:29
The "principles" of the GIP are supposedly linked to the founders of the Constitution. This is pure bunk. The Founders of the Constitution were agents of change. They would want the nation to change by the time the 21st Century rolled around - and adapt to the type of world the 21st Century presented itself ... multiculturally oriented, where the basis of equality includes, at least, by this time, equality of the sexes, races, true religious freedom (not necessarily "Christian" based), and in all other manners that people choose to express the freedom that this time in history offers. Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and others were anything but "saintly" people in their private lives - it is even rumored that they partook of substances that in the 21st century are classified as "controlled substances." Yet the Grand Old Wasp Partee hasn't got a clue. Clinging to the 2nd Amendment is a major bane on society, and everyone knows it. To restate a line from Jon Stewart, in his book "America": "Why do you think they're called AMENDMENTS." They are expected to be changed as time sees fit. They certainly are not divine rights, as so many gun-slingers seem to refer to them. Jesus didn't come down and say: "Thou shalt own guns and as many as you want to defend your homes and hunt for deer." Actually, I think he said to "Love one another." Don't you feel the love coming out of Washington?
Fri, 2013-02-15 14:07
This article left out the elephant in the room--a discussion of how the Conservative Entertainment Complex (right-wing talk radio and Faux News) are responsible for the state of the GOP. Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity, and their ilk, are only concerned with making money, so they keep the Republican base in a constant state of boiling rage. The don't care about the damage this does to the party or the country--they're laughing all the way to the bank.
Sat, 2013-02-16 09:59
The demise of the Republican Party comes not from its ideals or goals, but from its method of organization of faction. This party has failed three times before, as Federalists, as National Republicans, and as Whigs. The difference between the two parties was apparent in the election of 1800. Federalists thought they could succeed by promotion of political and financial philosophies borrowed from the Whig Party of England. Jefferson and Madison used direct organization of faction called caucuses, the use of elected officials in the extra-legal capacity of party organization, upon which to base their party. Once in power, the Republican Democrats nullified the power of Congress with judicial review in Marbury v. Madison in 1803, enabling them to impose slavery upon the United States through Supreme Court decisions. Judicial review was turned on its head by Abraham Lincoln when he wrote the Emancipation Proclamation and succeeded in getting the thirteenth amendment passed shortly before his assassination. This once again re-asserted the power of the Executive and Legislative branches until 1973 when the Supreme Court once again declared itself the most powerful branch of government with Roe v. Wade.
That Supreme Court decision signaled the demise of the Republicans, although they appeared to still have political power for a time. They are now in about the same position the Federalists were in after the election of 1800. The Federalists hung around for another sixteen years, but were not really there. Then the question of slavery divided the Republican-Democrats into what are now the Republican and Democratic Parties.
In all of this party contention there is one group of voters studiously avoided in any political conversation, independent voters. When the nation started, all voters were independent voters because there were no organized political parties. The election of 1800 made the United States a one-party government with a lot of independent voters until Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren re-organized the Republican-Democrats into the modern Democratic Party, a pro-slavery party which started the Civil War. The success of the Democrats in convincing Americans that political parties were necessary in American government reduced the number of independent voters to a single digit percentage until as recently as the Presidency of John F. Kennedy, after which independent voters began to increase to their present level of 40% of the voters, the largest block of voters today, but without representation in government because federal courts have declared them to be the only Americans not protected by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This, of course, will not continue forever. My prediction is that now that the Republicans are finished as a party, they will go in the direction of independent voters because that is the only direction available to them. That means the Democratic Party is done also. It is just a matter of time.
You need to be logged in to comment.
(If there's one thing we know about comment trolls, it's that they're lazy)


text:
Skip to Section Subnavigation Skip to Page Content
For first-year and transfer students.
Associate and bachelor's degree programs for men and women 4 full years out of high school.
Elementary, middle level and secondary certification for men and women with a bachelor's degree.
Skip to Page Content
Dr. Barbara K. Mistick was formally installed as the 19th president of Wilson College today during an investiture ceremony that highlighted a weekend of celebratory events and brought hundreds of visitors to the campus, including four past presidents of the college.
DATE: Oct. 1, 2011
CONTACT: Cathy Mentzer, Manager of Media Relations
Phone: 717-264-4141, Ext. 3178
Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
CHAMBERSBURG, Pa. – Dr. Barbara K. Mistick was formally installed as the 19th president of Wilson College today during an investiture ceremony that highlighted a weekend of celebratory events and brought hundreds of visitors to the campus, including four past presidents of the college.
Although the ceremony was forced indoors because of rain, spirits were high as Mistick formally assumed the presidency, a post she has held since July 1. More than 500 people attended the inauguration, including about 200 who were part of the inaugural procession of delegates from more than 40 colleges and universities, educational organizations, the Presbyterian Church, alumnae class representatives, current and former trustees, faculty and staff, students, past presidents and honored guests and family members.
In welcoming those who attended, Wilson Board of Trustees Chair John W. Gibb called the ceremony "one of the more colorful rites of passage on a college campus, and also one of the most meaningful." He expressed confidence that Mistick, who was unanimously appointed by the board of trustees in March, is the leader who brings the academic credentials, entrepreneurial spirit and business acumen Wilson will need to thrive in the shifting landscape of higher education today.
"Wilson has been blessed to have the right leader with the right skills for each moment in her history, and today that remarkable run continues with the inauguration of Dr. Mistick," Gibb said.
Dr. Don L. Francis, president of the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Pennsylvania (AICUP) made introductory remarks before Mistick's friend and mentor, Seton Hill University President JoAnne Boyle, spoke. Calling Mistick a lifelong learner who is perceptive and intelligent, Boyle said the new president will "ask the right questions" as she goes about doing her job.
"She will examine your investments … and with her businesswoman's head, she will multiply, leverage and capitalize on them," Boyle said of Mistick. "She will keep her spirits raised and she will raise the spirits of Wilson College."
A number of speakers delivered greetings during the ceremony, including the president of the senior class and president of the college alumnae association, representatives of the Women's College Coalition
and the Synod of the Trinity, and State Sen. Richard Alloway II.
Gibb performed the investiture of Mistick and placed a medallion around her neck.
"And now with the full confidence of the board of trustees, joined by those gathered here today, Dr. Barbara Mistick, I declare that you are the 19th president of Wilson College," said Gibb, as the audience erupted in cheers and a standing ovation.
In her inaugural address, Mistick — a nationally recognized educator, innovator in entrepreneurship and advocate for women's issues — spoke about the personal connection she felt to Wilson College when she was a candidate for the presidency.
"Many of you have asked me what first drew me to Wilson, and I must answer you honestly today that it was our students, who remind me of my daughters," said Mistick said, who spoke of the strong women in her own family and how their courage and strength is reflected in today's young women.
"If any of you here today have been worrying about the future of this great nation, stop worrying," she said. "I can assure you as I watch my daughters become confident women, that I know our nation – in fact our world – will be in great hands."
Mistick thanked those in attendance, including Wilson's most recent past presidents: Dr. Donald F. Bletz, Dr. Mary-Linda Merriam Armacost, Dr. Gwendolyn Jensen and Dr. Lorna Edmundson.
"I am honored to have the privilege and the responsibilities of carrying on the traditions of a distinguished liberal arts education forged at Wilson, and am humbled by your trust and inspired by all gathered here today," said Mistick.
She spoke about the confidence that women's colleges like Wilson instill in girls and young women, as well as the value of a liberal arts education. Miss Sarah Wilson, who donated the money to start Wilson College in the post-Civil War era, "would be thrilled to know that 142 years later, each of our students — women and men — are avid learners who will carry a passion for learning to the next generation."
Despite the strides made by women since Wilson was founded, Wilson's focus on educating women remains important, according to Mistick.
"When we educate women, we educate our society," she said. "This is the courageous spirit I see in the Wilson Woman archetype — pioneers, entrepreneurs, teachers and an unwavering commitment to social justice. Wilson Women have given me very great hope and confidence that our future is secure and strong."
Finally Mistick expressed her gratitude for being given the opportunity to lead the institution through the next chapter in its history.
"I'm honored and humbled to work alongside these young women and invest in their dreams for the future — a future I know they can find at Wilson," she said. "And I aspire to confirm and build upon the legacy and love of Wilson College. I am thrilled to be with you."
The last presidential inauguration at Wilson was held Oct. 6, 2001, when Edmundson assumed the office.
Mistick was appointed to the presidency after Edmundson announced her retirement, effective June 30. Mistick was most recently president of Pittsburgh's Carnegie Library System. Over the course of her 30-year career, she has been an entrepreneur, educator and leader at such institutions as the H.J. Heinz School of Public Policy and Management at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, the National Education Center for Women in Business at Seton Hill University in Greensburg and at various businesses she managed and/or founded.
Several receptions and dinners, as well as talks and demonstrations, took place throughout the inaugural weekend, including a lawn party Saturday evening. A chapel service and brunch to be held Sunday will conclude the inauguration weekend events.
To read Dr. Mistick's speech, watch video or look through the inauguration weekend picture gallery click here.
For more information, contact the Wilson Department of Communications at 717-264-4141, Ext. 3178; 717-262-2607 or firstname.lastname@example.com.
Founded in 1869, Wilson College is a liberal arts college dedicated to the education of women. Affiliated with the Presbyterian Church and located in Chambersburg, Pa. Wilson offers bachelor's degrees in 30 areas and master's degrees in education and the humanities. The college's 2011-12 enrollment in the College for Women and the Adult Degree Programs is 746 and includes 21 students from 10 foreign countries.

subset: commoncrawl


text: " His was the voice of my" coming of age" ...dramatic..imploring...pained ..spectacular ... I learned his every nuance. I lived in grief and joy in his songs and, crazily much later in time we became friends, in our "Atlantic" connection ... A wonderful, kind man. A huge influence, loved and respected by so many. My thoughts go out to Betty ... - RP


text:
Lawrence, KA (Sports Network) - The Oklahoma State Cowboys survived a late Kansas rally and held on to defeat the Jayhawks in a Pac-12 matchup at Memorial Stadium, 20-14.
Freshman J.W. Walsh completed 18-of-29 passes for 255 yards, a touchdown and an interception for Oklahoma State (3-2, 1-1 Big 12). Joseph Randle added 80 yards on 29 carries, while Charlie Moore reeled in five catches for 97 yards and a score.
Kansas (1-5, 0-3) got another poor performance from quarterback Dayne Crist, who entered the game completing just 50 percent of his throws. Crist completed 10-of-22 for 136 yards before Charlie Weis removed him from the game in favor of Michael Cummings. Cummings was a little better, going 5-for-10 for 75 yards and a touchdown. James Sims was the most consistent offensive player for the Jayhawks, rushing for 138 yards and a touchdown on 27 tries.
Neither team looked sharp out of the gate as the first quarter ended without a score. After a lightning storm delayed play for more than an hour, Oklahoma State came out firing. A 31-yard completion to Victor Irokansi set up a four- yard rushing touchdown for Walsh, his second of the season.
Quinn Sharp added to the Cowboys lead, capping a 13-play drive with a 49-yard field goal. He then missed a 52-yard attempt as time ran out in the half, and Oklahoma State held a 10-0 halftime advantage.
The Cowboys increased their lead to 17-0 when Walsh hit Moore for a 72-yard touchdown, the longest reception of his career. Sharp hit another field goal, this time from 42 yards out, and with a 20-0 lead entering the fourth quarter, it appeared that the Cowboys had the game in hand.
But Cummings entered the game and injected some life into the Kansas offense. With 11:30 remaining in the game, he connected with Jimmay Mundine for a 22- yard touchdown. After a Cowboys three and out, it was Sims' turn to find the end zone. A 28-yard run set up his 30-yard score, the second Jayhawk touchdown of the quarter. With more than nine minutes left, Kansas was down by just six.
Oklahoma State punted it back to the Jayhawks with 6:55 on the clock, but Cummings' pass on fourth and five fell incomplete and they turned the ball over on downs after a four minute, 12-play drive. A roughing the kicker penalty on fourth and eight allowed the Cowboys to run out the clock and hang on for the victory.
Mike Gundy improves to 62-32 as head coach of the Cowboys, tying him with Pat Jones for the most wins in school history.


text:
Discussion Issues 1
Intermediate50 videos10 units
- Unit 1: What's Your Destiny?Unit 1
- Unit 2: It's Your Life!Unit 2
- Unit 3: The World Is ChangingUnit 3
- Unit 4: The Human ConditionUnit 4
- Unit 5: Important Things in LifeUnit 5
- Unit 6: Use Your JudgmentUnit 6
- Unit 7: Cultural DifferencesUnit 7
- Unit 8: Who's Your Role Model?Unit 8
- Unit 9: The Future is HereUnit 9
- Unit 10: The Postmodern WorldUnit 10
- Start
Name and Destiny
About this Video
Each name stands for something. What does your name say about you?
Source: Spicus
Key Learning Points
- describing terms
- providing meanings
Condition for Happiness
About this Video
Happiness is all about positive physical and mental state.
Source: Spicus
Key Learning Points
- narrating an experience
- explaining conditions
About this Video
People should adopt a good list of healthy diet habits to prevent illnesses and death.
Source: Spicus
Key Learning Points
- presenting data
- asking for confirmation
Idol Star
About this Video
Becoming a star or celebrity at a young age could leave a person with a lonely life.
Source: Spicus
Key Learning Points
- describing events
- discussing a sequence
Tree-planting Campaign
About this Video
Every April 5th is what is known as the so-called "Day of Trees" in Korea.
Source: Spicus
Key Learning Points
- describing pictures
- sequencing events
Quiz Words from These Videos
About this QuizQuiz yourself on 20 words and phrases from this unit.
This 10-unit, intermediate-level course contains videos that cover discussions about current issues. At the end of the course, you should be able to communicate more effectively and talk about topics such as:
- It's Your Life!
- The World Is Changing
- Important Things in Life
- Cultural Differences
- The Future Is Here
Demo Mode
Great Job!
Great Job!
words learned
Great Job!
Register for Free to Track Progress
Share it with your friends
Great Job!
Register for Free to Track Progress
Register. It's free!
Teacher Webinar Sign-up.


text:
To begin receiving information about Historic Alexandria programs, special events, news and more, update your subscription or subscribe to
Alexandria eNews. The following Historic Alexandria subscriptions are available:
Read the following newsletters online.
Become a Facebook fan and share your support for history. You do not have to be a Facebook member to view these pages. In addition to the Historic Alexandria Museums listed below, two other Alexandria sites, Carlyle House and the Lee-Fendall House, are also on Facebook.
Listen to Historic Alexandria Podcasts for audio walking tours and more.
Buy tickets to Historic Alexandria events?
Comply with archaeological preservation laws?
Conduct my own research on local history and genealogy?
Donate items of significance to Alexandria collections?
Learn about events for families?
Obtain an easement for an historic property?
Receive timely information on Historic Alexandria events?
Rent a historic property for a private event?
Schedule a group tour or program?
Office of Historic Alexandria
Administration Offices
Lloyd House220 North Washington StreetAlexandria, VA 22314703.746.4554Fax: 703.838.6451Email
Office HoursMonday - Friday8 a.m. to 5 p.m.


text:
Bright Alphabet Puzzle
Our Bright Alphabet Puzzle by Hape makes learning the ABC's fun. Featuring brightly colored, chunky letters that fit into a cut-out board, your child will enjoy using the letters to practice the alphabet and spell simple words. The letters stand up on their own, so they can also be used for decorative purposes in a child's room by creating simple words such as boy, girl, cutie, etc.
- Recommended for children 3 years and older
- Made of solid maple and birch plywood harvested from FSC-managed forests
- Finished with child-safe, non-toxic, water-based pain
- Measures approximately 11" x 11" x .75"
- Designed and manufactured by our friends at Hape, a leader in sustainably-produced children's toys
- Made in China


text:
Girl Scout cookies – decisions, decisions
If it's January, that means taxes, holiday bills, cold weather, et cetera. There's one thing, though, that many look forward to in January – the sale of Girl Scout cookies. Editor Don Whitten takes a look at the most popular cookies as he prepares to place his order. (January 20, 2012, Page 4A)


text:
Michael `t Sas-Rolfes 06/17/2011
Conservation of animals like rhinos and elephants may eventually be conducted most successfully by markets where these animals have monetary value rather than just emotional value. It may sound cold, but it could well keep them from becoming extinct
Terry Anderson 06/20/2008
Stanford Review Interview with Terry Anderson
Chip Mellor 10/01/2005
Audio - Chip Mellor(Use Explorer for best results)
Terry Anderson 03/01/2001
Tech Central March 12, 2001 By Lynn Scarlett
NWRA (National Water Resources Association): What is PERC's mission and how are you included in groundwater marketing?
Q. Why did you write about the Mining Law of 1872?
Terry Anderson 10/01/1997
By Candice Jackson Mayhugh Stanford Review


text:
Red Ribbon Isn't All That's Missing from Fed's Package Against PA Farmer; WI Farmer Seeks to Promote His Sheriff
When you go to buy a car or insurance, the sales people nearly instantaneously print out all the documentation you need. All you have to do is sign on the bottom line. No need to bother with all the fine print.
Well, the U.S. Department of Justice has kind of done the same thing in its prosecution of Pennsylvania dairy farmer Dan Allgyer, on behalf of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA announced last April that it planned to seek the permanent injunction, as the outcome of its more than year-long "undercover" investigation of a Maryland food club.
In this instant-injunction package, there's the cover page with the authoritative Department of Justice emblem (shown here, unfortunately screwing up the splashy cover by misspelling Allgyer's name); the government's formal motion for summary judgment, including the list of ten lawyers and big-wig bureaucrats from the DofJ and the FDA presumably involved in this high-priority case; the 19-page memorandum in support of the government's motion; a six-page statement of "undisputed facts"; and then the "order of permanent injunction". All the U.S. District Court judge on the case, Lawrence Stengler, needs to do, is sign and date the "order"…and, presto, Allgyer is forever prohibited from sending milk to members of Grassfed on the Hill in Maryland...and essentially is out of business.
Actually, he doesn't just get to be put out of business. The proposed injunction provides for the added privilege of having his farm inspected whenever FDA agents are bored or just have the urge, AND he gets to pay big time for the privilege (at rates of $87.57 or $104.96 per hour, plus 51 cents a mile for their travel, plus the regular government "per diem" for meals and hotels). One inspection that lasts a day or two, and involves two or three agents, who, of course, have to write up a detailed report afterwards, could cost $10,000. Maybe they decide to do it once a year, maybe once a month, maybe once a week. Whatever their pleasure.
At the end of five years, Allgyer can tell the court he's been a good boy, and appeal to have the injunction lifted, and maybe it will be and maybe it won't. If not, the inspection arrangement continues.
The government lawyers argue that, based on the "undisputed facts" of the case--that Allgyer was distributing raw milk to the Grassfed on the Hill food club in Maryland--the judge should issue the permanent injunction.
The most interesting part of the whole neatly wrapped package is the argument in the memorandum in support of the government's motion, that members of a private association are engaged in commerce and are subject to the interstate ban on raw milk. Neither the federal agencies nor their regulations "recognize an exception to the prohibited conduct based on the nature of the contractual arrangement between the distributor and consumer of unpasteurized milk or between so-called 'private' consumers and the general public. In broad and unequivocal terms (the prohibition on interstate raw milk shipments) bans the interstate delivery, sale, or distribution of pasteurized milk in final package form for direct human consumption."
In a footnote, the government's brief observes: "Although no federal court has yet addressed whether private membership association or cow-share arrangements violate federal law, a few state courts have addressed these issues in the context of state laws banning intrastate sales of unpasteurized milk." As its only example, the footnote cites the Wisconsin decision last August (and introduces it as an exhibit) that concluded in part that a herdshare arrangement there was "purposely designed to avoid cash sales of dairy products in an attempt to circumvent" state law.
Interestingly, the government's brief neglects to mention the 2006 Ohio case that sanctioned herdshare arrangments. Presumably, the federal lawyers knew about the case, because they referred to "a few state courts" that have addressed the issue. Strange oversight, that the Ohio case isn't mentioned.
And because "performance of these agreements would violate federal law...the contracts are unenforceable..." concludes the government brief.
There is another oversight in the government's "statement of undisputed facts" in the case. It reports that "over the course of the investigation, 12 samples were sent to an independent laboratory for analysis. All of the samples were confirmed to be unpasteurized milk."
What the "statement of undisputed facts" neglects to mention is that the independent laboratory checked for the presence of four major pathogens--listeria monocytogenes, E.coli O157:H7, salmonella, and campylobacter--and everything came out negative. I know because I obtained the lab tests via a Freedom of Information Act request.
As an aside, the lab tests also show some seemingly high results for coliforms...from a low of 38 to "greater than" 160,000. The coliform counts are way above the legal limits specified in some states; for example, California requires raw milk to be at less than 10 coliforms per milliliter. Coliforms are harmless bacteria, and the counts are thought to be reflective of overall sanitation, and milk quality. I am told by food club members who drink the milk that the Allgyer milk tastes excellent and usually lasts up to a couple of weeks.
The fact that no pathogens were found over an extended period of testing was no doubt a big disappointment to the FDA. Definitely not worth alerting the judge to, from the FDA's viewpoint.
Allgyer now needs to try to convince the judge not to sign on the dotted line. Like many Amish who face legal challenges, he is representing himself...up against the full judicial firepower of the United States government.
Wisconsin dairy farmer Vernon Hershberger reports he was just served with the summons to appear in court January 4, following the reports yesterday of the criminal complaint. He will be answering to four misdemeanor charges of violating Wisconsin dairy and retailing laws.
Hershberger is the farmer who, a year-and-a-half ago, cut the tape placed on his farm's coolers by the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, and returned to serving his 150 or so food club members.
In the meantime, he is seeking to gain the support of his county's sheriff. He has offered to send the sheriff to a national convention of up to 200 county sheriffs being in Las Vegas next month. He says he has already raised the funds necessary to send the sheriff, Chip Meister, to the convention, and is now trying to convince him to attend.
He has put together a petition, which can be easily filled out and returned to Hershberger. In addition, or alternatively, Hershberger is encouraging supporters to call the sheriff and encourage him to attend the conference, and ensure that Hershberger's rights are respected during any criminal proceedings. Here is what Hershberger suggests: "Call or email Sauk County Sherriff Chip Meister at firstname.lastname@example.com, or 608-355-3208. Please be very courteous and respectful in your message or speech. Just let him know that you are supporting him fully if he stands up against the State to protect the Hershberger Family. I will stress it again, be courteous and respectful, he is our family's friend and we want to keep it that way!"
Sounds like they are being subjected to witch hunts and the govt is planning to slowly burn all dissenters.
I know we go around and around on this - but why are the stakes so high that the FDA is going to such lengths to persecute small farmers? Sylvia's term "witch hunt" is apt here.
I hope Mr. Allyger and Mr. Hershberger prevail. They are brave people and it's terrible that they have to go through this wringer by our own government.
Unsurprising. Farmers are a far easier target for the state, both legally and in a practical, logistic, strategic sense. The message is clear: Dare to share with your neighbor -- let alone be tainted with any whiff of "commerce" without letting Uncle Enzo wet his beak -- and you will be denied even the right to provide for yourself and your family. Surely a stubborn few will respond, as some here have suggested, by acquiring their own cow or goat when cut off from any and all outside sources -- and thus is another of the state's twofold goals achieved, strengthening so-called "political society" at the expense of real, civil society. You cannot depend on, help or trade with your fellows -- if you attempt to do so, we will stop you -- you must rely on us from cradle to grave, and obey our every commend.
There are a few things going on, apart from the FDA's ongoing war on raw milk. For one, the FDA wants to scare producers of raw dairy. By coming down hard on a few (remember the email where the agent says they want to string them up one at a time), they hope to send a message to many.
Second, and more immediate, the FDA is worried about the growing popularity of the private food system. That has nothing to do with raw milk, but everything to do with control of the food system. The FDA wants to consolidate its control, and the private system threatens that.
"(remember the email where the agent says they want to string them up one at a time)"
Tis a witch hunt. They even put it in writing.
Beware, they are still pushing for NAIS... Push out the small farmers and guess who controls what you eat and the environment you live in.....
If you read the comments on this link in regards to the cookie dough and consumption of it raw, you'll get the general idea of how the masses think/view their foods.
I guess these same people either don't read all the ingredients or they just don't care what goes into their bodies.
Like many, I grew up eating raw cookie dough (home made), cake batter, rare beef, hamburger and mystery meats/foods in Istanbul, I ate street foods in Europe. I didn't get sick then, though, I did get sick from eating at a boyscout picnic...many did that day. The docs suspected it was they mayo in the potato salad. Of the at least 9 that ended up in the ED, there were no stool cultures done, we were told to monitor for dehydration,etc and sent home.
Yes, Sylvia, it is an absolute shame that people do not educate themselves about the foods that they buy from the standard grocery stores. They have no clue what that product contains, let alone, how that product was made. People have become too too comfortable with the unhealthy conveniences from these stores. Personally, I would never, ever eat anything raw that came from a mega-factory, processing facility. Fresh homemade cookie dough? Oh YES, absolutely, no question about it (I have been doing so for 60 yrs)!! The ingredients are NOT necessarily the problem (unless they too came from a tainted processing factory), the problem is strongly related to the cleanliness & contamination likelihood of the processing facility & it's employees. Think about it...generations & generations have eaten homemade raw cookie dough without any problems or illnesses. If people do not make their food from scratch, from wholesome, healthy nutrient rich ingredients, then they need to educate themselves on how & where the foods that they buy at the standard grocery stores come from & how they were processed. I think more people would drastically change the way they eat once they do so. People of today truly do not know anything about the food they buy & eat...they don't know how those foods have been adulterated, chemically infused, contaminated, genetically modified & more!!
If I may interject here, I do not think the issue is "private" clubs (which are really now selling to the general public, for all practical purposes)
I think the issue is that we are trying to develop an alternative food system, which our corporate masters do not want to deal with.
"Bankers are the dictators of the West"
re. your comment above, what is your definition of
general public
practical purpose
I disagree with your comment that private buying clubs essentially sell to the public. Since I am a seasonal milker, I have stopped in to buy milk at a couple of local buying clubs in past winters. They categorically refused to sell any milk to me as a non-member - even when I offered to sign up and pay the fee right away. Carelessness and greed are not their hallmark in my experience.
I am somewhat cautious in support of the Freedom Riders in that they seem only to address the issue of interstate commerce. While interstate commerce is a goal of OPDC and it is the mechanism whereby many of the farmers cited on this blog have fell afoul of the authorities, I don't think crossing state lines is something most farmers do. If you aren't allowed to produce raw milk in the first place, what does it matter where you intend to transport it?
On the other hand, it is one of the few acts whereby the consumers can evoke a reaction from the FDA, so maybe it is a valid first step. I do believe the passion these people show is genuine.
Mr. Odegaard,
I like the term "tortured milk". Commodity dairy is one of the most processed foods available, and they are further tweaking it with their elaborate technology all the time
Also I have made langfil many times in my kitchen, I believe it is commercially available in most Scandinavian countries. Cultures are available on the internet.
I would disagree as well about your characterization of private food clubs. As Kirsten points out, many clubs are very restrictive in their membership criteria. As I pointed out recently in reviewing John Moody's new book on food clubs, he provides advice to organizers about interviewing techniques to ensure only those truly interested in and committed to obtaining nutrient-dense foods are allowed to join (and government agents, for example, kept out).
But there are two issues raised by the FDA in its case against Dan Allgyer. First, can any food club, no matter how "private," be outside the public regulatory realm? FDA says none can quality. Second, presuming there is some degree of privacy that is acceptable to our judiciary, how private must it be? Not allow advertising? Require a certain amount of annual spending? Have equity ownership of particular farms? My sense is the courts are going to have to eventually rule on both these questions.
And to Kirsten, yes, the Raw Milk Freedom Riders have limited themselves to fighting the interstate ban on raw milk, at least initially. The reasoning has more to do with focus, as you suggest. It's not as if there aren't many other related problems, including rights infringements within many states. It is more "a first step," as you point out. It is definitely not about helping particular dairies, like OPDC, expand their markets nationally. I'd say a major goal of the Raw Milk Freedom Riders is education--to inform more people who care about their food about the arbitrary and expanding controls being placed on our access to nutritionally-dense foods.
Good points, David, but I still maintain that this promotion of "private clubs" as the solution to the prohibition of raw milk is the wrong route to take. Its a slippery slope. Should these so-called "private clubs" be allowed to discriminate against people because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, etc...? Should they be allowed to spew toxins into the environment, and be exempt from environmental protection laws? There are numerous other examples, if you to think about it.
Sure, you can point to the example of the boy scouts (who are exempted from anti-discrimination laws, with their official discrimination against gays and atheists). But when you get down to it, that's a protectionist racket for the military-industrial complex. Eagle Scouts receive special privileges in the military if they enlist before they turn 18. The raw milk industry is never going to receive that level of official privilege which the boy scouts enjoy.
And clearly, these clubs aren't all that private if FDA agents are so easily able to infiltrate them. Socialists and other left-wing activists have been dealing with brutal government repression for over a century, dating back to at least the execution of the organizers of the Haymarket general strike in 1886, not to mention the red scares of 1918 and 1947, the McCarthy era, and the more recent "Green scares" against ecological and animal rights activists on the West Coast. I think we on the radical left have a far more experience in dealing with state repression... just take a look at this information:
This does mean I'm endorsing the FDA's crackdown, I'm just questioning the wisdom of this
"private club" approach to increasing availability of raw milk. You have to appreciate the irony of these so called "libertarians" who always extol the virtues of the America being a Republic (not a "democracy"), when the root of the word "Republic" is PUBLIC.
I'm in favor of raw milk being available to the general public. If a "private club" was indeed the best route to achieve that goal, then I would be working to promote private clubs, but as these cases are making more and more clear, the private club route is probably going to prove a dead end.
This makes me so incredibly angry.
They will fine people like Allgyer and Schmidt into submission, using the same fees and fines that fall under "petty cash" for corporate farms.
The US (at least) is headed for a "perfect storm" in the confluence of unemployment, concentration of wealth and power at the top, and economic persecution of those at the bottom. We left the US for Canada because we wanted to live a simple life, and saw no support for such in the US. I fear armed insurrection is the inevitable result -- it's only a matter of "when," not "if."
If only they would throw people like Allgyer in jail instead of fining them; then perhaps the "sheeple" would awaken. But they're too smart for that -- they only throw increasing numbers of people in jail who could not possibly garner public sympathy, like small-time pot dealers and petty criminals, people they've already driven into economic deprivation.
I hope and pray that by attacking people with a long-standing tradition of tight community and voluntary simplicity (Amish, Mennonites, etc.), the whole thing backfires. I invite Allgyer and others to not pay these fines and fees, and for their community to rally around them, like the final scene of the movie Witness, when the Amish peaceably surround the bad guys, and Harrison Ford shouts, "What you gonna do, kill them all?"
Gandhi pointed out that a few tens of thousands of British could not control a hundred million Indians without their consent. It is time to withdraw our tacit consent from our oppressors.
Sorry, a correction to my above post:
This does NOT mean I'm endorsing the FDA's crackdown...
that was a typo
Bill, I understand your reluctance to embrace "private clubs" as *the* means of allowing access to raw milk.
I think it needs to be stretched to the point of "collective ownership." I agree that, for example, Costco is a "private club," and it would be a long shot in many states to argue that Costco should be able to distribute raw milk outside the purview of the FDA or state health departments.
When we first formed our herd-share, I ran it by our lawyer, who was apoplectic about the implications, saying the courts could liken it to a magazine subscription.
So while I strongly back the "collective ownership" approach, perhaps a fundamentally different approach should be taken: religion.
So far, the strength of the conservative religious right has the rather interesting side-effect of strengthening Freedom of Religion in general. With the increasing popularity of neo-pagan spiritual practices -- combined with the decreasing congregations in traditional churches -- perhaps it's time start a religious movement based on food freedom.
The Bible (Corinthians 6:19) claims "you body is a temple." It does not seem like a long stretch to claim legal protection for the right to determine what gets in that temple. Surely, the Amish and other "primitive" sects would have a leg up in this regard, the only problem being distribution to those outside their sect.
Surely, if Scientology can receive protection as a religion, "Foodology" could, as well?
I like your way of thinking. I'm not convinced that the religious right is necessarily a friend of religious freedom, though. Many of them have drummed up hate against Islam. However, there is evidence that some evangelical Christians are slowly starting to split from the Republican Party because of the Bush administration's crimes against humanity.
If we found "Foodology", it should be an agnostic religion, like Buddhism.
The word agnostic is used to describe someone who is doubtful or noncommittal about something. What do you mean by "an agnostic religion?
It seems apparent that those who purchase raw milk and other whole natural foods have little doubt about its value and their commitment to such foods is growing stronger by the day.
here in BC, we're an inch closer to REAL MILK being de-criminalized after the farce of Dec 6th. When we do prevail, there will still be a place for herdshares, because they offer a special benefit of assured supply to the members of the private club. As long as that club don't go asking permission from the govt. to exercise our right to associate with whomsoever we want - or NOT - then we don't fall under Big Sister's iron heel.
pretending to be a "liberal" whilst getting all exercised and paranoid about us who discriminate according to the tenets of our religion, whom we want to associate, is the rankest hypocrisy.... what's it to you crypto commie Bill Anderson, who I hang around with? Would a few more laws ordering people's daily lives suit you? You'd do well in the socialist utopias of Cuba and Red China, Why aren't you in Venezula today, if socialism is so wonderful?.
A generation of the Central Party Planners imposing multi-cultural-ism on me has given me the insight to know that the Campaign for REAL MILK is a phenomenon of the white race re-discovering our heritage ... ie. the agricultural and food laws of the Bible. Wasn't it the founding Fathers who said they were establishing a Republic for them and their posterity?
Hi Gordon,
To answer your question -- because I'd rather be fighting for democracy and social justice HERE in America, where it is needed more badly than anywhere else in the world right now. My ancestors who settled in here Wisconsin were German and Scandanvians, both cultures with strong traditions of democratic socialism. Milwaukee is the only city in the US to have had two socialist mayors.
As for the "central planners"... those must be the capitalist banking interests you are talking about. Most of the so-called founding fathers were slave holders and bankers. Thomas Paine was the notable exception, and he was a radical leftist, skeptic of religion (See "The Age of Reason"), and one the earliest promoters of a guaranteed income. Paine was instrumental to the success of the American Revolution, as I'd hope you are aware.
Also, speaking of "crypto-commies", Mr. Watson, aren't you familiar with the history of Mark McAfee's father, and his support of California's Black Panther Party? Yes, he was a socialist too...
If you'd like to speak about European Heritage, then let's begin by agreeing that we are not Christians by heritage. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was imposed on European people through force and violence. We are earth-worshipping pagans by our true heritage. Not that it matters... people should be free to worship as they choose.
By agnostic, I mean that one should maintain skepticism of the existence of a god, but does not deny the possibility since it cannot be proven or disproven. Perhaps a better term here would be "nontheistic"
"Foodology"... I like that!
Perhaps from your perspective one should maintain skepticism of the existence of a god Indeed skepticism is a natural and purposeful trait and although I have experienced my share of it I have personally chosen to believe in God and His Son Jesus Christ.
Christianity made inroads into Europe because of the selfless philosophy it espoused. Paul and Peter entered Rome, not with a sword but with a belief and an understanding of the truth that would set one free.
Indeed the movement became politicalized and oppressive. There were a great many people persecuted, including those who truly followed Christs example.
In fact there are many political movements such as Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, Protestantism, Catholicism and Buddhism etc. They are all religious in nature and although they may use the Christian philosophy as a tool to achieve a goal, they aught not be confused with true Christianity.
Christs church is alive in the hearts of many and will prevail despite ongoing and current threats.
"And clearly, these clubs aren't all that private if FDA agents are so easily able to infiltrate them."
Given that these agents have dozens of years experience, the vast wealth and resources of forced extortion to deploy at their command at any time, multiple other agencies to draw from and upon, and specific training in engaging in such activities, your remarks show a genuine lack of thought, and the whips of their ex-corporate croonie heads driving them, your comments bear considerable revision at best, or show an unwillingness to look at the situation with a bit more objectivity at least.
Private does not mean underground, or how could anyone find a buying club to be a part of? Clubs have to balance private membership with still operating within a larger, public community and world.
The average club is ran by an average person who wants to help with the environmental, economic, and other issues created by our modern industrial system. Sorry they don't measure up to your special ops/psy ops credentials you think they should have for ferreting out what to many average folk is an almost unbelievable use of our nation's agencies and resources.
Most people still have a hard time even believing that the gov't would do this to Amish and other farmers, let alone thinking that an undercover agent may be coming to a "home near you" anytime soon.
I am very well informed on the history of government repression of dissident elements in the United States. It does not surprise me in the least that the government expends resources ferreting out raw milk distributors. In fact, the repression of raw milk clubs is small game compared to some of the other groups which the state has targeted over the years. The radical labor union which belong to (the Industrial Workers of the World) had over a milliion members in the early 1920s, and was completely destroyed by the FBI headed by J Edgar Hoover.
Just google "COINTELPRO" sometime, and you will learn about the dark history of US government repression of dissent.
I was raised Roman Catholic, and taught English, History, and Algebra by nuns. I am thoroughly familiar with Christian doctrines. I stopped believing in Christian doctrines when I was 15 years old, and became an atheist. However, over time I saw that atheism is itself a religious dogma, and gave up on that too.
In my opinion, the most profound scene in the New Testament was when Christ threw the money changers out of the temple. It is the only example of Christ using violence in the modern version of the Bible, and it was for an undoubtedly anti-capitalist cause. However, there is much reason to believe that the Bible has been expunged of some of its more controversial elements over the centuries, in order to be politically correct for the ruling classes of Europe.
When you think about it, Christ was a revolutionary socialist. He showed how the sharing of food caused it to multiply. He gave away free healthcare. He was a grassroots organizer and spent his time with the poor and downtrodden, while railing against the religious authorities and imperialist armies.
I'm not sure what "current threats" you are talking about to Christianity? Islam is not a a threat to Christianity, only to American empire. IMO, the biggest threat to Christianity is probably itself.
Stories like this make farming appear quite lucrative. Also sounds like most farmers have huge amounts of farming land, whether rented or owned...... more media misrepresenting what reality is not.
I picked strawberries and tomatoes long before I was 16 in Ca.... I learned that those 2 field jobs were not what I wanted to do the rest of my life and it pushed me to further my education. That and cleaning stalls at the stables taught me to appreciate those who do hard physical labor. (mucking stalls was ok, as I love horses) They were jobs and put money in my hands as a preteen and teenager. I grew up learning that there were no handouts and you worked for your pay.
They will still be confined and treated un-naturally.....
Happy Birthday David!
It's a pretty far stretch to associate Jesus Christ's giving, healing, helping, etc. to your commie/socialist force, with a gun if necessary, to support gigantic bureaucracies with an agenda, and waste beyond comprehension.You completely miss Christ's message. FREELY give! No one held a gun to his head, and he wasn't using other people's money. I suppose you could count the tithe, but that was also FREELY given, for that purpose.
New American Standard Bible Mathew 25
35For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; 36naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me. 37Then the righteous will answer Him, Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? 38And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? 39When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You? 40The King will answer and say to them, Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.
I'm guessing it doesn't count if it's with other people's money that was taken from them by force, with an agenda, socialist rules, and stipulations.
Catholicism has its merits however do not attempt to equate Catholic doctrine with Christianity. I gave up on Catholic doctrine when I was in my early forties and became a Christian.
A Christians greatest threat is temptation and vice. There are numerous oppressive forces at work in this world designed to undermine Christian virtue. C. S. Lewis sums it up well, Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
I grew up Catholic as well and knew deep in my heart in my younger years something wasn't quite right with it (same with conventional medicine). It wasn't until my divorce that God hit me on the head with a 2X4 and opened my eyes to the truth. Jesus told Nicodemus (a member of the ruling council and teacher of the law) in the famous "Nick at night" passage in John 3 about being born again. That is what happened to me in January 1989 - He opened my eyes to the true spiritual food.
Google Voice of the Martyrs and you will find out about persecution of Christians all over.
The only "religion" with a living God, not man-made. It's about a relationship - not being a good person or doing good things to gain your eternal perspective or whatever you may think we call Heaven. Yes as a result of putting your faith in God/Jesus/The Holy Spirit (The Trinity), you do good works but they don't save you. Only Jesus Christ can save you.
And then God opened my eyes to the truth about physical food! Thank you Jesus!
I would join a "Foodology" but not based on any deities.
"I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" -Jesus Christ
Based on my reading of that passage, it sounds like Christ was talking about class warfare.
Cheyenne, I do not support "gigantic bureaucracies with an agenda", at all. I have no idea where I've ever suggested I support those things. As a sociailst, I recognize that the liberation of the oppressed must be act of the oppressed themselves. A bureaucracy cannot bring about liberation or an end to oppression.
As for the question of taxes and government spending taken by force, I think Christ's advice was also very germaine: "Give unto Cesar what is Cesar's..."
The US Federal government was founded by and for corporate capitalist banking interests, going back to the earliest days of the republic. To oppose the (meager) social welfare programs it has based on some right-wing "libertarian" agenda is evil, IMO. The capitalist system is responsible for so much poverty and oppression, it is just trying to remedy the worst of those evils to maintain some degree of social stability. But these programs are just band-aid fixes. To truly liberate the poorest elements in our society requires the self-empowerment of those communities. The Black Panther Party was one such example of community self-empowerment historically, and today Will Allen's growing power (in Milwaukee) is another such example. If you were to google "COINTELPRO", you'd find out about the brutal government oppression of the Black Panthers, including the assasination of many of its members.
As I said, these raw milk clubs are small game. The US gov't has been waging brutal war against dissident elements for a long, long time. Raw milk proponents should consider ourselves lucky how good we've got it. No one has been killed or imprisoned yet over raw milk, to my knowledge.
Thanks Mary...I'm at a point I try not to think too much about birthdays, if you know what I mean.
Also, would like to second John Moody's comment about private food clubs. This country is about "private enterprise," and the private enterprises come in all kinds of forms. For the most part, they organize and operate according to how the owners and organizers decide. They allow in those they want as owners, stakeholders, members. There is something distinctly American about the approach.
But we underwent a shift somewhere during the last 50 years, and the move toward fear-mongering and ever-great-control of the masses has encouraged the government apparatus to try to turn our food club approach into scape goats. They would love to say the clubs are unsafe, but they keep running up against the reality that there provide a safe (and highly nutritious) supply of food, so they just say, "You can't do that. Why? Because we say so."
Bill Anderson is right in his statements from a previous post, I think the issue is that we are trying to develop an alternative food system, which our corporate masters do not want to deal with, and "Bankers are the dictators of the West."
TPTB banksters, for decades, have used the natural antipathy between countryside and city. The city laborer wants a low price and is fearful of increasing cost to his well being. The countryside the farmer does not earn a wage. He doesnt get a paycheck from an employer. His earned income is the result of two factors, units of production and price. His gross income is production x price. This is true of the farmer but also anybody who extracts raw materials from the earth or harvests the energy of the sun falling on the green chlorophyll of plants. It is the gross earned income from the countryside that pays the labor bill in the city when the farmer buys materials, supplies and equipment that are manufactured by the urban laborer.
A cheap food policy falters earned income and sets in motion the necessity for a bankers line of credit. There were several times in the twentieth century where farm prices were in alignment with costs: 1910 - 1914, 1926 1928, and 1947 1949. The last of those periods was programmed by government decree for the purpose that the United States would not go bankrupt fighting World War II. The concept was developed for farm parity by doing the careful analysis of the two former periods. So, we have a record that proves the case and US Code that can be brought up to date and implemented to put the banksters out of business. This story was exhaustively covered by Charles Walters in his lifes work in creating ACRES USA and in his book Unforgiven. He was not alone, however, and we have a rich heritage in this concept if anyone is willing to investigate it.
Ingvar previously posted dairy prices at 10-year increments. He had a second list of numbers that he didnt explain what they meant. Checking his work for the 10 year increments it was found that the numbers for the years are actually as follows (ACTUAL prices are in parantheses following Ingvars numbers):
Ingvars #s, (ACTUAL #s from USDA statistics per cwt)
2011 $ 16.00 (16.30) (2010)
2000 $ 12.17 (12.30)
1990 $ 9.24 (12.80)
1980 $ 5.82 (12.90)
1970 $ 2.74 ( 5.50)
1960 $ 2.09 (3.80)
1950 $ 1.70 (3.10) (1949)*
*NOTE: 1950 dairy farmers received 79% of parity. 1949 Was the last year that dairymen received a full price for their product in the marketplace.
These were average yearly prices paid to the commercial dairy farmer per hundredweight of milk @ 11.7 gal/cwt. (Ingvar doesnt say what the second set of figures he lad listed represent).
$16 in 2011 does not have the same purchasing power as $3.10 did in 1949. In 1949 farm prices were calculated according to a simple arithmetic formula by the USDA. The USDA was authorized to buy storable commodities when prices dropped below 90% of parity and sell at 110% of parity, the purpose of which was to stabilize farm prices at 100% parity. In other words, give farmers the necessary purchasing power so that they did not need to borrow long term. This also meant that when the farmer spent that earned income, city people had employment and earned income that created a relatively debt free level of prosperity that this country had not seen since the late 1920s and the period especially 1910 1914. Farm prices had to be faltered in order for the Federal Reserve to get the power that it has today. In the late 1940s, bankers could only find a market for 16 cents of every dollar they had on deposit. The federal government turned a profit in protecting the American farmers price level. Buying at 90% and selling at 110% stabilized prices, something that allows producers to plan and curtails speculation. This was not a subsidy program but a price support program. This system was trashed for the one we have today so that imports would become profitable when they should be tariffed to protect the American producer.
$3.10 per cwt in 1949 somehow was enough income for our countryside to be filled with dairy farms of 12 cows or fewer. It was also a time when the postage stamp was 3 cents and $1000 would buy a really nice new car. The postage stamp today is 0.44, a 1470% increase, keeping in mind that the post office is not solvent. A new car (no longer made in America) and, granted, much simpler back in 1950 when it could be maintained under your shade tree, is now $20,000 30,000 and not user friendly. This is a 2000 to 3000% increase. On the other hand, $3.10 compared to $16.30, is a 526% increase. Using the postage stamp comparison, milk should be $45.57, not $16.30. Keep in mind that farmers, commercially, sell wholesale, but buy all their equipment and supplies retail.
John Moody, in his new book, asserts: Deal with farmers in a consistent and business-like way. A big part of a food club's success depends on farmers who have a realistic view of the business landscape. He advises farmers: "Your discount to clubs that are placing large orders with you should be at least 25 percent so they can offer products to their members at least at your regular retail price. Most stores will be asking a 40-50 percent discount from suppliers, so consider working with clubs a deal!"
When a farmer discounts his product 25%, he has to increase sales 33% to maintain the same bottom line profitability. Discounting 40% results in having to increase sales by 66%. At 50% discount he has to increase 100%. These are exponential increases in production. In addition, milk isnt like water, you dont just leave the spigot on twice as long, it means more than twice as much work for the same income. This is the model that came out of Harvard in the late 1940s, funded by the Rockefellers, that shut down the parity concept and was instituted by USDA Secretary Ezra Taft Benson under the Eisenhower administration, were going to quit mollycoddling the farmer. What was this new system called? Vertical integration. Produce more for less, get rid of the inefficient farmers, leave the land in a few strong hands, America will feed the world, plow up and farm fence row to fence row. Free trade means lower prices for consumers. Supply and be damned frustration economics. Familiar with asymptotes? As cost per gallon goes to zero, production goes to infinity.
Heres the math:
to earn $1000 @ $10/gal requires 100 gal.
@ 7.50 requires 133 gal
@ 6.00 requires 166 gal
@ 5.00 requires 200 gal.
Remember, this is not profit because of the commensurate increased cost of production, trying to spread your costs over more units of production and ultimately results in the get big or get out trap.
Today we met with our county Sheriff elect to encourage him to participate in the County Sheriff Project. We were there for an hour with him and his Chief Deputy. We briefed them on the issue of raw milk and FDA random acts of terror and encouraged him to go to the January conference in Las Vegas. Plans are now developing for a county, regional and then statewide initiative.
Deb Stockton hit the nail on the head in her first paragraph. The US elites try to leverage urban wage earners against rural farmers. Its a divide and conquer strategy.
I disagree with you, David. American capitalism is built upon corporations, which are public enterprises, not private enterprises.
Corporations are chartered by the government, granted special privileges which include limited liability. In the earliest days of the Republic, a corporation could have its charter revoked if it was deemed that it was not serving the public interest, and these corporations were granted protection from foreign competition in the form of stiff tarrifs, to encourage the development of domestic industry. It wasn't until after Wall Street's triumph over Southern Feudalism in the civil war that the supreme court granted corporations personhood, which they have enjoyed since the late 1800's. Today, the corporate board of directors has virtual dictatorial control over the affairs of the corporation, with the fiduciary imperative of maximizing profit.
The ever-greater-control of the masses which you lament is thanks to the increasing concentration of corporate power. The food clubs are but one of many victims of this concentration of power.
The whole mythology of private enterprise needs to be put to rest. The industrial revolution did not happen because of private enterprise. It happened because of public enterprise. This is a simple historical fact, like it or not.
I am not against entrepreneurialism or the free market. I have ambitions to be an entrepreneur myself, but this requires a hard look at the facts. The purpose of an enterprise in a free market economy is to serve the public.
Your "meager" social welfare programs don't qualify as bureaucracy? LOL! And you say it's helping. By creating generations of helpless, demanding, welfare addicts? By ripping apart many innocent families to feed the CPS machine, only to find out that masses of those children are being sexually abused and other horrible things. Two wrongs don't make a right. Large corporations and complicit government agencies are, and always have been a problem, but so is the corrupt government bureaucracy you seem to like so much.
You supported the unions (they're not corrupt big $$$$$?) in the nutso fest in WI, demanding that they be allowed to continue to plunder the country side. Now we see small school districts saving over 1 million in health insurance premiums alone, just by getting out of the union racket. That is evil, yet, you stand with them and demand I should have to keep paying it. How many small farmers have struggled to pay the extortion fee demanded by the union/school district to support their gravy train? Ooppps, I forgot, we are only supposed to focus on certain areas.If the farmers would get a better pay price, then the plunder and corruption for your interests would be ok?
"Its a slippery slope. Should these so-called "private clubs" be allowed to discriminate against people because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, etc...?"
I'd call that an agenda, Bill!
Let me guess, you support government intervention, for your agenda, to make sure those evil private clubs have to do it YOUR way. So what if a private club wants to discriminate? Go to a different one or start your own!
You are totally out of touch with the political realities in our seat of government. The unions are a drop in the bucket of what big business spends. The ratio is pennies to the dollar, even on strictly the Democratic Party side.
Crack cocaine was introduced to the inner city by the CIA. This fact is well documented. It is not the welfare programs that created this problem, it is the military-industrial complex.
I have argued stridently against the Madison area Green Party getting involved in the recall Walker effort, because we should be focusing on ecological and social justice issues. This electoral campaign is not a suitable substitute for real grassroots class struggle.
And frankly, it doesn't matter whether the private club discriminates or not. They are still going to get raided by the government, because the government is controlled by big business.
I would not participate in a private club that discriminates, and I would make sure that club is ostracized for doing so. I have been involved in protesting against racist businesses in Madison.
I'm not interested in getting into a fight with you over this. If you want to spew your right-wing hatred, please do it to someone else.
As I expected. The unions are just "drop in the bucket" corruption, so it's ok. I'm just supposed to keep throwing money down that rat hole. I am opposed to ALL corruption.
Oh no, the hate card. When all else fails...... Bill's favorite tactic. Don't respond then. I'm not forcing you to write back. lol
I didn't say you would have to support the club, It's called FREEDOM! But, I suspect you'd like to see government bureaucracies with an agenda force your twisted view on the rest of us.
The IWW has a critique of the conservative trade unions. I agree with you that they can be corrupt. The conservative/chauvinistic trade unions are more interested in protecting privileges for a skilled set of workers than in organizing the entire working class.
Cheyenne, I don't like you putting words in my mouth. I do believe that people are capable of overcoming racism and homophobia without government intervention. If anything, it is the government which (directly or indirectly) upholds racism. However, when oppressive institutions like organized religion and corporate powers divide us against one another, overcoming other forms of oppression becomes less important to people.
The religious right is a great example of this. The homophobia and islamophobia promoted by religious conservatives is a big, big problem, and contributes to direct government oppression of those groups. Yet I don't hear you complaining about that. This is the problem with the right-wing "libertarian" ideology, based on the philosophy of rugged individualism. It causes people to only care about the freedom of their own group, and not about the freedom of other groups.
i am not a fan of conventional medicine, I try to have a bar-code free kitchen, I drink raw milk.
I try to treat people with kindness no matter who they are. Although I am not 'rich', I try to share what I have with others.
Oh, and I am a Catholic.
I would never say anything so hurtful about your choice of beliefs or lack of same as some of you have written here.
Just to clarify, my comments above were NOT meant to be insults of people's religious practices. I am 100% in favor of religious freedom, and would completely support forming a secular or neo-pagan religion around the consumption of raw milk.
The purpose of my comments is that I am very very worried that certain elements of American Christianity are not in favor of religious freedom for other groups, namely Muslims. This is an ongoing problem in many Western nations, not just ours. I also worry about certain Christian elements (such as Gordon Watson) who justify other bigoted beliefs using the shield of religious ideology.
I respect Christianity. I think that the New Testament is a validation of socialist principles in its own historical context and the terminology that was used in that time and place.
In any case, I'm done commenting here for now. I just wanted to make a point that the narrow minded and selfish ideology of "freedom for me and mine" (what is often incorrectly called "libertarian" in the US... a more accurate term would be "proprietarian") is part of the problem, not part of the solution. If we really want freedom, then we must work for freedom from oppression for ALL people, including those who are very different from us.
This is the essence of socialist philosophy and action. It is a fundamental belief in the goodness of humankind, and in our ability to overcome oppression if we work together in an open-minded and democratic manner.
Have a great one folks. And thanks again to David for his great analysis on TCP.


text:
What If We Farmed The Way We Fish?
Great little animation from WWF Canada makes you think about how we get our seafood.
Organic, grain fed, free range etc. People are starting to get more informed about the food they eat, but not so much when it comes to the seafood they eat.
This post was created by a user and has not been vetted or endorsed by BuzzFeed's editorial staff. BuzzFeed Community is a place where anyone can post awesome lists and creations. Learn more or post your buzz!
Preview Your Response
Here Are The Top Stories
- Greece voted "no" on sweeping new austerity measures tied to further bailout funds. Its future in the eurozone is uncertain, and its creditors are unimpressed.
- The U.S. defeated Japan 5-2 in Vancouver in the final match of the FIFA Women's World Cup. It was the highest scoring final in the history of the tournament ⚽
- Captured New York prison escapee David Sweat has been released from hospital and is back in jail.


text:
Strengthens Collaboration between the Nation's Lupus Research Organizations
May Lupus Research Awareness Month Campaign Aims to Enlist 1 Million To Work For a World Without Lupus
Project Runway's Tim Gunn Joins 400 NYC Leaders at S.L.E. Lupus Foundation's Annual Bag Ladies Luncheon
Ten new Novel Research Grants are now poised to take high-risk, high-reward research in lupus to new levels.
Three exceptional women will be recognized as Women of Achievement at the upcoming 2014 Bag Ladies Luncheon April 28.
Before asking Congress to budget for lupus research, our advocates got the facts. Following summarizes what we learned so you can also know what we are fighting for and why we need Congressional support.
Lupus Research Institute CEO Margaret Dowd met with Representative Thomas J. Rooney, co-chair of the Congressional Lupus Caucus, during the LRI's annual advocacy campaign in Washington.
The LRI and S.L.E. Lupus Foundation congratulate Dr. Daniel Wallace on his appointment as consultant to XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. for the planned Phase II trial for the Company's hCDR1 compound for lupus.
The voice of lupus is resounding throughout the U.S. Capitol as the Lupus Research Institute's National Coalition visits over 50 legislators and staff for 2014 Lupus Advocacy Day.
Text LUPUS to 50555 to donate $10 to research. Or text INFO to 50555 and opt-in to receive breaking news about lupus on your mobile phone.
Message and data rates may apply. Text STOP to 50555 to STOP. Text HELP to 50555 for HELP. Full Terms
Learn about local news and events from the LRI National Coalition.
Visit LupusTrials.org learn about lupus clinical trials that might be right for you or a family member.


text:
Having previously purchased slipcase editions, I was a bit miffed having spent £160-00 on 4 of the "UA" slipcase editions ... to find that none of them were pre-signed.
Is this normal for this particular book or did I buy some "rogue copies" ... did anyone buy a copy that was pre-signed ???