text:
- Stephen G. Davis
- Laguna Hills, CA
- United States
CEO, KnGrid
This conversation is closed.
Maintaining human civilization by focusing on the key challenges of our time: energy, food and resource depletion.
While the ominous threats of a changing climate have failed to prompt America or any other large economy to wake up from our consensus trance, there are other challenges equally as frightening and urgent: The certainty of increasingly costly fossil fuels and their impact on our banking system. Rising energy prices are taking their toll on the middle class already.
At the same time, we see a scramble by emerging economies to emulate America's suburban lifestyle. The problem is that America's perpetual growth model rely's on cheap energy to validate suburban home values. It is a problem that no politician can even discuss in today's hacked operating system for privately funded elections.
We must develop clear consensus about this problem. In order to avoid economic chaos, we need to chart an orderly course to a world that does not rely on ever increasing oil production and perpetual growth in consumption of all things.
We have an entire industry with formidable political clout that does not want this problem to even be acknowledged, let alone solved.
There are solutions:
1. More walkable and bike-able communities with local food production
2. Less Suburban sprawl which leads to stranded (and destroyed) wealth as liquid fossil fuel prices inevitably trend upward when daily production rates peak.
3. More emphasis on distributed energy generation with renewable sources combined with energy storage technology.
4. Developing less energy intensive farming techniques that don't rely on oil based fertilizers and pesticides. ("Perma-culture")
This transition will require decades. To avoid chaotic economic consequences, it needs to begin now. As T. Boone Pickens once asked "when's the best time to plant a tree? The answer is 20 years ago." Another salient comment from James Howard Kunstler: "No amount of renewable energy is going to allow us to continue running what we're running the way we're running it."
If this frightens you, it should.
Sep 14 2013: I think the key challenges of our time are completely different.
Energy, food and resource depletion -> are not challenges at all. They are only consequences of the total ignorance and extremely low level of education.
The key challenges are:
(1) The education available to everybody and appropriate to the needs of the epoch. Nurturing an integral and systemic understanding of the society, sociotechnic and sociology, governance, economy, psychology, global historical process, religion, elements of mathematics; nurturing the constructive and methodological culture of cognition, thinking and communication.
(2) Fulfillment of the appropriate maneuver towards the global society on principles of democracy (public sovereignty) and by that avoiding the third world war. This is a real challenge. The established practice and culture of diplomacy and global peace making is not appropriate: it accumulates conflicts in all regions of the Earth instead of discharging the conflicts, which have been accumulating for centuries of wars, racial and religious conflicts, etc. It is time to reevaluate the moral aspects of the interrelations between people of different cultures of the world. And build a new global culture which will not dominate over other cultures and erase them, but which will integrate them and persist their originality and unique identity.
(3) Restrain the disruption of control in the technosphere, resolve the system crisis.
(3.A) The growth of the amount of information and "informational garbage" is accelerating over years
(3.B) It results in persistent increase of complexity of all systems
(3.C) It worsens by separation of particular specialists in their domains: they speak different languages which only they understand
(3.D) The growth of complexity results in the growth of entropy, ambiguity, unpredictability, "chaos". The technosphere becomes more and more unpredictable. Less understandable. We have the crisis of control.
On what level are you agree with me?
Prof Mpiya
Sep 14 2013: one of the key challenges of the modern era is our humanity is dying as in our very humaness is under threat due to the pursuit of power and money
- +2
W. Ying
Sep 6 2013: .
- +2
The problem is easy to solve if we know
"high standards of living" contains about 90%
of invalid (harmful) happiness.
Sep 6 2013: You are so correct that I immediately understood the need to change the title of the conversation. I changed it from "restoring high standards of living" to "Maintaining human civilization." I do believe that, in the US, we could restore our middle class by focusing on the massive project of retrofitting the largest economy in the world to be more sustainable. That is a project that will take decades and require a lot of high wage jobs, but the larger question requires the global perspective on human civilization and what that means. You hit on it!Sep 25 2013: A finite planet verses, unlimited growth, extraction and population, increasing consumption and waste and you believe we're not heading for a fall? Follow the trends....
1804 - 1 Billion people
1950 - 3 Billion people
2013 - over 7 Billion.... and counting...
Then look at the overshoot regarding extraction on every front.
The future will be very different than the past.... just how much is the question... The gilded age is over...
Sep 25 2013: Could not agree more Craig. We owe it to our kids to try to 'manage the unavoidable and avoid the unmanageable.'Sep 25 2013: I doubt there might be an easy and fast solution for overpopulation... I'm afraid.
I find interesting all these reasonable solutions proposed by Stephen (walkable/bike-able, local food production, less Suburban sprawl, renewable sources, less energy intensive farming...). Check this thread, where we're specifically analyzing the sprawling of industrial parks and factories and trying to find solutions to integrate them into compact cities (as we've all already assumed residential buildings should be dense) http://www.ted.com/conversations/20134/can_we_think_of_factories_and.html
All those things would perfectly work in developed countries and would definitely help to improve and optimize the life in wealthier countries. But what about the rest? What Craig mentions needs other type of solutions, as the projected over-population will mainly come from needy countries and we're probably not thinking fast enough.Sep 14 2013: Reorganized political structures --> technocratic, science oriented global governance (locally managed, but operating from analytically deduced set of axioms minimizing room for dogma and subjectivity)
1. Impose birth control (earn the right to reproduce)
2. Redistribution of resources
3. Reallocation of labour and specialism per area in the world (based on logical analysis of local potential)
4. Reinventing the meaning and purpose of homo sapiens anno 2013 (focus on longterm survival, not personal gain)
5. Adopt economic model based on actual value, not (blind) growth
I agree this looks more like a bad proposal for a sci-fi film than it looks like a realistic possibility. Current dynamics are too strong and embedded in our psyche and through our psyche manifested in solid social, political and economic structures. The above could only be achieved by force (not likely since those with excessive wealth happen to control methods of force and largely want to keep things as they are) or resurrection after global catastrophe. Personally I think our (free market/individualized) civilisation will collapse (result of war both civil and international/economic stagnation/socio-cultural fragmentation) within let's say 100-200 years giving opportunity to the rise of new systems based on new principles (better or worse).
Maybe for some I sound too radical and dramatic. But if my observations correspond with reality, windmills, electric cars, gay marriage and micro financing are just not going to improve the ever increasingly fragile position were in at the moment. But rest assured, history teaches we are not the first civilization to encounter serious issues regarding survival.
Important note: I do not claim we should not take initiative and just lean back and watch the show. I think there are a lot of inspired people who could make great changes. However I am pessimistic about the timeframe vs. counterforcesSep 11 2013: Stephen I agree that your issues are important and your solutions "could" be workable, like many other ingenious ideas one sees on TED. The important word there is "could". First I do not agree that we have decades for implementation. Second yours and most of the other ideas will not help soon enough unless we can rapidly reeducate a plurality of the population to the point where they are in agreement about solutions and priorities. TED itself is having a positive effect, but pleased as I am with TEDs burgeoning popularity it tends to be limited to people with relatively open minds and a level of education that enables understanding. In essence they are mostly preaching to the choir and those who already have an ear for music. To me there is only one true key and that has to be educational reform outside the box of government and from the grass roots up. If we can educate and empower a proactive plurality sufficient to override those who resist change then everything becomes possible. Without this I am very much afraid that no solutions will be implemented effectively.
Mike Colera
Sep 10 2013: Mr. Davis.
- +1
Me ????
Snaky about California???
You are correct.
How could you "Californians" have taken some of the most pristine places in the USA and turned it into a over crowded, over paved, water hogging, smog filled places in the country. Then you stand on " high moral ground" about saving the environment and preaching about conserving resources and green things because the world is hurting from all the over indulgences of mankind....
Nobody from my neighborhood went out to California and polluted the land, built houses on top of each other and spends hours on the freeways idling aimlessly trying to get to offices down town to write articles saying the world is coming to an end.
Your world is... green stuff and all
Gerd Weyer
Sep 10 2013: Stephen, Thank you for addressing this important topic.
- +1
To make true progress, before consequences force action, I believe there needs to be a shift in public priority. This shift in priority will occur, the only question is will it occur proactively or reactively.
With the support of the majority, several tax policy changes that would cause implementation of at least three of the four changes you advocate are, eliminate all oil subsidies, tax fuel consumption heavily and tax car ownership at the full cost of driving, particularly the building of and maintenance of roads. Increasing the tax on fuel now is a much better solution than the alternative, waiting until market conditions cause an unpredictable, uncontrolled, increase.
The fact that a debate concerning elimination of tax deductions, for having additional kids, does not appear to exist, is confounding.
Fritzie -
Sep 9 2013: This article may interest you: http://sustainablecitiescollective.com/kaidbenfield/174496/green-sprawl-still-sprawl?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Sustainable+Cities+Collective+%28all+posts%29&utm_content=Yahoo%21+MailSep 7 2013: Stephen, These are certainly prime issues and deserve the focus you suggest. I have a hard time thinking that they are being taken seriously by the leaders and spokespersons for energy etc ... Obama gave big stimulus to "green" development that had no chance and almost immediately closed the doors and pocketed the money ... Al Gore is a punch line for cocktail jokes and has become rich for preaching what he does not practice. As a grid specialist you understand that the administrations plan to close coal generation plants has no plan to replace the power on the national grid .. moving toward UN Article 21 by Hillary Clinton .. and much more ...
- +1
I often refer to 1916 Argentina as a example of where the USA is going. Argentina was a major world player and elected leadership that made all of the same promises that the US is being made. The government grew to super size, the adopted social programs that were financially impossible to support, they levied heavy taxes on first the rich and when that did not work the middle and the poor were taxed to support big government ... Inflation was over 4000%. The solution was to print more money. The farmers left and moved to the city for government jobs ... the country went from a world leader to bankrupt and in total depression in one year.
We have people who speak to us of the dangers of Keynesian economics, the banking industry, the federal reserve, the advent of social programs that are not funded, elite government officials, trade imbalances, etc ... yet the message is muted in a media that fails to report facts that would better inform the public.
The issues you speak of are important and deserve attention ... however, larger problems continue to grow and will destroy our country making these moot. Again we fail to learn from history.
I wish you well. Bob.
Sep 10 2013: Bob, Thank you for the excellent assessment. I would suggest that the threat caused by Keynesian economics and the corresponding government program of massive money printing and deficit spending may be more immediate, but the issue of sustainability is never "moot". Gerd
Sep 10 2013: I agree that the issues are not moot ... the statement I made referred to if the government collapses through any of the looming problems (including these issues) then the focus is unnecessary. What I see is a problem across the board. The immediate problems you have pegged. Only one greater issue that I can think of would be to have a congress that puts the country first before politics and personal gain. Since this a millionaires club this ain't gonna happen.
Since the problems are seen ... what is the key to a better informed voting public that would not be swayed by political rhetoric from either party.
Thanks for the reply. Bob.
Gerd Weyer
Sep 10 2013: Bob, You are dead on with respect to referring to the voting public. I see congress as a mere reflection of the general public that puts much greater emphasis on personal gain than public good.
- +1
The public is concerned about self, particularly the immediate future. Republicans stand for small government and low taxes and Democrats stand for more services associated with bigger government and more taxes. The public likes lower taxes and more services, politicians want to get re-elected, so republicans cut taxes and democrats increase services, and the national debt grows.
The public wants immediate economic growth and government provides a solution, fiscal and monetary stimulus. The long term consequences are misunderstood and ignored in the process.
If current government practices result in bursting of the bond bubble, the consequences will be more severe than those associated with the housing bubble burst. Personal well being will decline and the environment will be adversly affected.
bart hsi
Sep 11 2013: Gerd, I have some thought about the effect of Keynesian economic stimulus. When we talk about the sustainability, most discussion here are linked to the population growth and urban constructions. Now, imagine what were the result of such stimulus? First, the effect of such stimuli cause more consumption of goods and services. But, are we sure they were spent on goods or production labor based in the U. S. ? The answer is probably not necessarily true. A substantial portion of the consumption were probably imported from foreign countries. Moreover, a portion of the stimulus are spent on construction of highways and bridges which tend to increase the concrete or paved spaces, which is not ecologically friendly to mother earth. And then a lot more of the stimulus went to the welfare payments to the "poor", especially to many women and their children without a supporting father. What this spending has done is to encourage human reproduction without responsibility; i. e., increase the population with nonproductive, even delinquent children or adults. What I am saying is that the government spending not only increase the national debt, it also exacerbates the sustainability of the resource allocation and the ecological sustainability of the earth. I am not saying that we shouldn't spend money on welfare for the poor, but not on more reckless expansion of the welfare spending, entitled as economic stimulus, which is probably of marginal value and not cost-efficient. If you sum up all the stimulus money or the building up of the national debt, they are hardly less than the economic growth they were aimed at with the total spending. (they were probably no more than one to one, rather than the claimed $4 increase in GDP for every $1 spent in Keynesian stimulus.)
- 0
wayne uejio
Sep 6 2013: The move back to the cities is listed in "the end of the suburbs" and an interesting documentary " the end of suburbia"
- +1
The storage and distribution problem is huge but to make it truly solvable we need newer technology. Using current technology, we can create a band-aid system for the moment but it will not be efficient.
Sep 6 2013: I've seen "The End of Suburbia." I think that what may be more practical is to create "downtowns" within the suburbs and develop walkable communities within them using "New Urbanism" templates.
Sep 6 2013: This seems to be a very common strategy.
Sep 7 2013: Heya Fritzie! Have you seen David Harvey's latest offerings?
He's smart, but when you stand back - what does a city do? How does it exist?
At a suitable distance it looks a lot like a parasite ;)
I have an intuition that we need to step back and comprehend what we actually are .. not what we pretend to be.
From that angle, I feel there is a lot of work to be done to identify the default mechanisms of tribal dynamics - the systemic evolutionary mechanisms that phase-shifted us beyond the conditions we are truly suited to survive.
I count exponential growth as a terminal strategy for a species. Microbes in a petrie dish only experience extinction on the last doubling.Sep 8 2013: (from the post on Pat's thread -- my attempt to sub-phrase your entries resulted in a bazaar edit glitch.)
... David Harvey ... "right to the city"
that's Harvey's basic starting point. I was thinking more of this one:
Harvey assumes tribe-sizes have no limits. I argue that there are limits to tribe size dictated by the number of tribesmen that can be tracked in the autobiographical self (As per Damasio) - it's a physical brain-size limit. Cities might work better if this limit was recognised in design.
socio-structural response to changing conditions.
>I agree with Jared Diamond on this one - every tribe is an experiment. These experiments are dynamic adaptations to local geography - which changes.
If it works - it works .. for now. One can criticise how well it works, or if conditions have obsoleted the adaptation.
W.Ying .. look-up ..
>I did. a while ago. W. Ying has identified 2 very important aspects: symbiosis and emergence from the Younger Dryas - these aspects are built-into my current interests and speculations. For instance, I speculate that symbiosis is a continuum. We classify only parts of it - behavioural inter-dependence and physiological merger. I think it is a lot larger than that. It is clear that sudden climate shifts change the adaptive vector .. I'm not sure if there has been much genetic activity in humans .. perhaps we were simply driven to the edge of sociological adaptive range by the ice age or the end of it.
Authentic/inauthentic .. markets ..
"authenticity" might point to a time-frame measure of validity. What is an "author"? I spent 16 years designing market systems .. you could say I "authored" them .. so to me, they were authentic.
Yes, lots of people deny the existence of open systems - it's the downside of having perceptive frames as local minima.
There is natural demand and there is promoted demand.
Ill go into that in another postSep 8 2013: supply/demand - and the dynamics of authenticity.
Without going into the history of the evolution of supply/demand, I can say this:
There is natural demand, and promoted demand.
Natural demand makes no assumptions about needs/wants - the supplier just satisfies it.
There are problems with the changing nature of wants/needs. Although the Maslow pyramid describes the most stable parts, they are all subject to the seasonal geography - with "wants" being the most dynamic (fashion). Wants/needs are also qualitative .. there is an aspect of risk that correlates to quality - if you need water, you will drink muddy water, if you want it, you will only drink potable water.
We can now forecast natural demand with pinpoint accuracy - so long as the satisfaction transactions are all recorded - this includes wants as well as needs.
In a natural demand scenario, subsidy of specialist supply is ensured by the demand side. The specialist supplier will be subsidised to the extent that the "community" demands the supply - in that frame, you can include the market as a specialist participant of supply - and share the specialist subsidy.
The dynamic assumes an abundance based on surpluses arising from specialisation - if geographical constraints induce a scarcity, demand will rise along with supply-subsidy.
However, the qualitative aspect of needs - plus the fashion aspect of wants depends on demand-side perception.
we find these qualitative socio-prestigious components are subject to supply-side manipulations(for increased subsidy). Scarcity can be contrived and prestige(fashion) can be induced.
This is done via "promotion" - aka propaganda, PR, advertising.
A promoted market behaves differently. The effective forecasts have to separate induced demand in order to retain the natural baseline. This is not easy - induction causes massive disruptions in the signal ..
You could say: "wants are no longer satisfied - only expectations."
Could say more - no spacSep 6 2013: I find it interesting we are moving to smaller villages - lived in Maynard, MA and it was quite small but had a center. Concord was similar, just richer.
You might be interested in the cohousing movement. I have been tracking it for several years and am thinking of moving into one of the communities.Sep 5 2013: Thanks Fritzie. I wonder how many people would embrace the competing ideal, however, if the externalities associated with oil production (IE, climate change, military costs, environmental degradation, respiratory illness, etc) were priced in. In my mind, that's the best policy remedy. It involves what many today (sadly) believe is inherently evil: government and regulation. I'm well aware that TEDsters talk about more walkable communities, but is that trend happening fast enough to save us? I doubt it when I read about the projected number of automobiles anticipated by 2030. (from 800M to 2.1B)
Which gets to real challenge: There's not a single company on the S&P 500 that does make an implicit assumption in their business projections: unlimited access to growing supplies of oil. The banks certainly assume it every time they lend money for the purchase of a suburban home that has no value without the use of a car.
Are we addressing this as though we understood it? Nope.
Sep 5 2013: Providing affordable in-city housing is a major challenge to be sure. Imagine how many people living in the suburbs of San Francisco would move into the city if they could afford to live there! Even if prices at the pump do not reflect the true cost, traffic congestion for those who need to commute in can make either in-city living or telecommuting look pretty good.
Improving urban schools would be an extremely valuable policy lever. Many families choose suburbs primarily to escape urban schools.Sep 6 2013: Is it possible that the "inherently evil: government and regulation" influence in all this creates an environment that lowers the standard of living? In return, removing both the power of demand and the consumption rates of oil. Of which results in conflicting business projections with the reality of the market and the eventually dissolve of established business models. This then providing an opportunity for alternative solutions to be implemented. Would the results of this increase the purchasing power of the dollar?
The dollar's power is determined by our wallets, beliefs and the prospective prosperity that allows intelligent consumers to effectively dictate the relationship between commodity, regulation, government and corporations.
We just need to work on the 'intelligent consumer' part...
Fritzie -
Sep 5 2013: Several of the TED talks about cities are precisely about the virtue and trend of denser occupation of cities: http://www.ted.com/topics/cities
- +1
I know that and better bicycle and public transportation have been big themes in regional planning for some time.
Of course some people in all income categories really love having their own place with ground around it. That is the competing ideal.Oct 3 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J01FZDh8_oM
Jaguar attacks crocodile,When a jaguar pounces, sometimes bite is all it takes to receive a meal. video of a jaguar taking down a caiman in Brazil's Pantanal wetlands, pics of which went viral earlier this month.Jaguar attacks crocodile.Sep 29 2013: Hi Stephen G.
To get your questions about LFTRs answered, look up "Thorium: Energy Cheaper than Coal" by Prof. Hargraves of Dartmouth College. It is not only good on that subject, but covers the economics of all the other energy alternatives as well, and why they are inadequate. For some details on why Thorium was not continued from 40 years ago, look up the "Thorium Problem" on the Thorium Energy Alliance.com website. Also Kirk Sorensen on Youtube.Sep 26 2013: Good question George....
Particularly when our 'education' is educating toward a future that no longer exists. And
Given the amount of WAR we are engaged in over our lifetime , I would also question how ethically or moral we are??? Particularly when the reasons we went to war are lies, and self fulfilling prophecies. The evidence hardly supports your contention, I would humbly suggest.
Comment deleted
Sep 25 2013: I'm not sure I get the question, Craig. Wheres the evidence for what? I didn't say I that I don't believe we're in trouble. To the contrary, if you read my intro to this conversation, I posited that we are in trouble.Sep 25 2013: Why are we trying to work out how we are going to fit another 4 billion people? When is enough enough? To me the first thing that comes to mind is capping, even reducing human population globally.
Sep 25 2013: I've seen good research on how to slow population growth in countries where its happening the fastest. The solutions? Education, particularly of young women. Providing adequate nutrition. Healthcare. Rising incomes and education result in declining birth rates. Empowerment and education of women means they begin to hope for more for themselves. They seek and use birth control. They see opportunities (in many cases, through micro-lending) to create a more prosperous life. It's worked everywhere it's been tried.
Sep 25 2013: Yes, I too have heard the statistics on these things & I don't doubt them. The problem is, its not like the countries still having large families are poor & uneducated by choice... So whilst we should always strive towards bringing education & equality throughout the world, its not going to happen fast enough. In the mean time they're spilling out of their own borders and migrating to western countries. And so the global population continues to swell.
I wonder if wealth, equality & education leads to smaller families... Would forcing smaller families on the poorer countries result in a reversed effect? Surely a reduced strain on space & natural resources would lead to a time of plenty... And with that, time to focus on education & building wealth?Sep 24 2013: Sir, Your idea of " Maintaining human civilization by focusing on the key challenges of our time: energy, food and resource depletion". How about "Maintaining human Civilization by focusing on "Simplicity" what is now the human civilization is not having, our desires have taken reality but when are we going to say stop it enough is enough; and even if we stop with our current needs, still in order to maintain it we will require all the three above. permanent answer is Sir Simplicity and compromise.
Sep 24 2013: Kuldeep: I think we may be in agreement. Energy, food and conserving resources seem simple to me. If we try living in a world without energy, people suffer. We obviously need food. Simple. Changing course to avoid resource depletion. Simple. What am I missing?
Sep 25 2013: I agree with you sir, alternate solutions mention in your script for the problems is the first step in the change of our consumption pattern and ultimately in our lifestyle.
. .
Sep 24 2013: Hi Stephen,
- 0
What a fabulous conversation and related Talks.
I also love the way Ron's talk/ movement is transforming problems into solutions.
Sep 24 2013: Thanks Juliette! As I got deeper and deeper into this five years ago, my whole world changed. My entire career was taken over by this work. I now am involved in the electric power industry. (I was in international telecommunications before.) My company works on policy issues with state and federal government agencies and automakers (Electric Vehicles). This is so far afield of where I was. When I reflect on the immense scope of the challenge (retrofitting the entire global economy to be more sustainable) I used to get deflated about it, but things are changing. Will they change fast enough? We'll see, but we've no choice but to try once we grasp what's at stake.Sep 24 2013: My contention is that all problems lead to the lack of education. Imagine,if everyone in this world is highly educated,and they completely accept the decent morals,and live it out through their lives,what the world would be like.
Sep 25 2013: It would be a world without a lick of common sense.
Or as one friend once said, getting degreed in higher education is mostly about 'ritualized obedience'.
Read, David Orr's seminal work, Earth in mind....it should connect the dots for you..
Sep 26 2013: I mean ethically and morally educated,not scientifically. If education is merely a matter of ritualization, why are the people in the whole world so concerned about their children's education?
Sep 28 2013: George, so how does that manifest?
Are we teaching our children about a future they will inherent? Are there jobs after education?
Look at the trends and reality of no jobs, compromised environment and centralized wealth. Not the foundation this country was built upon.
Yes, many have good intentions for their children and is it enough?Oct 4 2013: George, Here's a description from Earth in Mind, David Orr.
In Earth in Mind, noted environmental educator David W. Orr focuses not on problems in education, but on the problem of education.
Much of what has gone wrong with the world, he argues, is the result of inadequate and misdirected education that: alienates us from life in the name of human domination; causes students to worry about how to make a living before they know who they are; overemphasizes success and careers; separates feeling from intellect and the practical from the theoretical; deadens the sense of wonder for the created world.
The crisis we face, Orr explains, is one of mind, perception, and values. It is, first and foremost, an educational challenge.
The author begins by establishing the grounds for a debate about education and knowledge. He describes the problems of education from an ecological perspective, and challenges the "terrible simplifiers" who wish to substitute numbers for values. He follows with a presentation of principles for re-creating education in the broadest way possible, discussing topics such as biophilia, the disciplinary structure of knowledge, the architecture of educational buildings, and the idea of ecological intelligence. Orr concludes by presenting concrete proposals for reorganizing the curriculum to draw out our affinity for life.
I invite you to read it and take your understanding deeper...
Oct 5 2013: Hi Craig,thanks for sharing the thoughts.
Since I haven't read Earth in Mind, allow me to argue in some pieces of your comment. I think as we all recognize the 'problem of education', this does not discount the importance of education,in stead,it shows the urgency of upgrading education system.
Yes,I agree that our current education is inadequate and sometimes misdirected, but I think it is not the purpose of education,it is the result of some of the students or teachers don't follow the principles of teaching. Does education teach students to bully on the weaker students? Does education teach students to lie,to quit when things got tough?
It is the rebels who defy education by neglecting their responsibility to learn,they ruin the educational environment,they undermine the harmony in the schools.
A non-education man is no difference to an animal,in other words,education differentiates us from animals. I firmly believe in the description'reorganizing the curriculum', it is the way to get education back to track,to perform its innate and unalienable destiny,nourishing mankind to meet the needs of the trends.
The question then how do we adapt our education system,I'm keen to know the'concrete proposals for reorganizing the curriculum' . would you mind sharing with me? ThanksSep 24 2013: What happened to zero population growth?Sep 21 2013: Starting with the assumption that cheap energy is what has enabled our present (for many) comfortable level of Civilization, it would seem that a cheap, safe , widely available non fossil fueled economy might just solve the problems you mention. Luckily, and fortuitously, such a source is available. The Thorium LFTR nuclear fission reactor has all the virtues one would want, and negligeble downsides, since it does not have any solid fuel rods, water, steam, high presssures, or hydrogen explosions. The whole subject has been quite neglected for 40 years, for dubious reasons.
Sep 24 2013: Shawn: I concur about LFTR. Oak Ridge National Lab built a prototype in the 70's. What I've read today is that only Idaho National Lab is looking at LFTR today and they're saying 25 years to commercialization. It just strikes me as odd. Why no push? Why no urgency? It resolves carbon, fuel cycle, safety and proliferation issues. I have no idea about costs/kWh. That may be the problem, which has always dogged nuclear. Still, I think you're right on and have thought this for some time. Bill Gates pushes the 'traveling wave' reactor technology. Again, quite a while before commercialization. In the meantime, there are considerable options for zero carbon energy and conservation. Conservation, of course, is the cheapest solution of them all.Sep 19 2013: It is a common saying in the corporate world that "Greed is good".
Unfortunately greed is making vermins out of humans and is striping us of our humanity. Selfishness has never benefitted any society, but these days it is being given another toga, which makes it easy for us to pursue it like zombies; without any care!
In most cases we know the truth, but we prefer lies because of the burden of responsibility. But truth is truth; it is what it is. Ignore at your peril.Sep 14 2013: I like your ideas and eagerness to develop a credible economic model for solar power. Lambasting big oil though for being who they are is like criticizing someone with a disability for being disabled. This criticism worked 30 years ago but is an outdated environmentalist pitch to right the wrongs of the world. You possess knowledge and your focus should be education and identifying best practices for implementing solar power. Ratings on panels, best conversion methods etc. What you haven't identified is how to create a market place for solar power that all stake holders and some new stakeholders can participate. You hit on an important part of the change process by listing the communities that have changed local laws to implement an economic model for distributive power. What your focus should be is to lobby the representatives in your network to create an economic model for distributive power that creates a new economy, If our federal government divided the country based on factors related to distributive power, ie, concentration of available rooftops, current base load consumption, days of sunlight, it would create for all stakeholders an economic model. If the rights to implement and create are offered in an auction it would provide for consumers and companies the assurances of a return on investment, market financial incentives, and tort limitation in exchange for competent management of distributive power. Power companies and early stage investors or the winning team could bid on the creation of multiple districts. Imagine companies as small as yours participating with large corporations to bid for the Western District for Distributive Power. Setting a hypothetical bid at 200 billion U,S, dollars for a 100 year franchise to provide and maintain rooftop solar voltaic panels. With a guaranteed return on investment distributed power will be the new norm for how we get electricity and through an auction consumers are assured buy in by the winning bidder.Sep 12 2013: Yes Stephen, you raise some very important points and identify a number of equally important issues and are to be commended for your ability to think outside the box.
But the sad reality is that nothing will change until we change the structure of our decision making process. That is to say, as long as we continue with this top down hierarchy of decision making whereby a small group of self-interested or special interested individuals are able to gain control of the WHOLE of a nations decision making process - and political parties are, themselves, special interest groups promoting their own agendas and interests - then we will always be at the mercy of those who control the process.
I suggest you explore some of the Direct Democracy and Participatory Democracy websites to see what a grassroots, bottom up decision making process could look like. Because until we take back the responsibility for the decision making process we will continue to victimized by those are able to seize control of a nation's political decision making in order to promote their own narrow minded, self- interested agendas and to impose whatever whacky and/or misguided beliefs they might hold upon the rest of us.
Sep 12 2013: William: I share your concerns about decision making today and agree it must change. I do believe there are pathways to sustainability with existing channels, however. One is Community Choice Aggregation for electric power. That's quite common in Illinois and is gaining ground here in California. A city (or group of cities) can offer via local ballot a choice to become, in effect, there own power company. They still pay the local utility to manage the distribution network, but they're then able to purchase electric power (and whatever renewable portfolio they want) from the wholesale power market. This is already happening. Marin County has already done it. San Francisco has announced it and will purchase 100% renewable power by 2020. This is state law. Other states are going forward with this also. Other things people can do at the local level is get involved.
In the end, we live in a republic. If you don't like how it works, you've no choice but to get involved and start trying to change it. Nobody suggests that it will be easy, but we have to try.Sep 11 2013: Hi Chad: For the record, I said this will "take" decades. I don't suggest that we have that long. I tend to agree with you that we don't, but that won't change how long this will take given the existing built environment. As eager as I am to effect positive change, I get uncomfortable when I hear terms like "rapid reeducation."
My belief is that my conservative friends place tremendous faith in free markets. That creates potential for common ground as I believe nothing stimulates change like price signals. Imputing externalities would dramatically change the way people live and work. Fossil fuels have gotten a free ride as power plants and automobiles have been permitted to pump 90 million tons of CO2 (not to mention lots of other particulate pollutants) into the air everyday for free.
Put a cost on that, and substitutions will emerge. More efficiency will arrive first, followed by changes in living patterns. Locally grown food will become the cheap food. Walmart's warehouse on wheels won't make sense anymore.
Human nature is not particularly well-suited to planning ahead to deal with problems that are easy to ignore. Just look at any crowded freeway.
In the end, I think this will come down to people getting the word out. It will come down to people 'in the choir' speaking to those outside the choir and recognizing reality. Will it happen fast enough for us to save ourselves? I don't know. As I said, if this scares you, it should.Sep 11 2013: What countries have fast population growth rates?
They are not the USA nor any other industrial or post-industrial country. They are countries that make most of their wealth off agriculture and resource extraction. Going "green" in the USA WILL NOT CHANGE THOSE COUNTRIES.Sep 11 2013: And how do we reduce birth rates? Here's a hint: The methods tried by leftist governments are doing a VERY BAD JOB. The leftist crap of legislating birth rates ends up, instead, horribly unbalancing the population and leading to a great deal of official corruption (cf, China). Oddly enough, a way to reduce birth rates has been discovered, but leftists and other psychotics refuse to admit it: Prosperity and basic education of girls reduce birth rates. Now, "prosperity" does not mean "welfare". Countries with an overall high GDP/person (in terms of purchasing power parity) and lots of jobs to go around are prosperous. Education of girls does not mean "everybody goes to college and majors in Womyn's Studies". It means that girls get and take advantage of access to k-12 education and successfully complete it. College simply follows along rather naturally when your k-12 is top-notch. Birth rates fall--BOOM!
In other words, when the peasants and wage slaves feel financially secure and little girls get as good a basic k-12 education as little boys, birth rates come under control, all by themselves, without need for leftist-style government meddling. This has been well-documented. Just look at Europe. The populations within Europe whose birth rates are not falling are the populations that cling to anti-girl cultural norms and have the worst job prospects. Look at Japan--prosperity and education equal population shrinkage. After all, once you are aware of 1) how easy it is to control ones own fertility in the present day; 2) you have more than a few pennies to rub together after you pay your bills; and 3) just how much other stuff you could do with those extra pennies if you only have one or two kids instead of four or five, it's amazing how quickly birth rates fall.
It's a simple, non-leftist, behavioral calculus. Show people the net personal benefits of something, don't just tell them (right-wing-style moralizing doesn't work, either). They will probably adopt it.Sep 11 2013: And how do we reduce birth rates? Here's a hint: The methods tried by leftist governments are doing a VERY BAD JOB. The leftist crap of legislating birth rates ends up, instead, horribly unbalancing the population and leading to a great deal of official corruption (cf, China). Oddly enough, a way to reduce birth rates has been discovered, but leftists and other psychotics refuse to admit it: Prosperity and basic education of girls reduce birth rates. Now, "prosperity" doe not mean "welfare". Countries with an overall high GDP/person (in terms of purchasing power parity) and lots of jobs to go around are prosperous. Education of girls does not mean "everybody goes to college and majors in Womyn's Studies". It means that girls get and take advantage of access to k-12 education and successfully complete it. College simply follows along rather naturally when your k-12 is top-notch. Birth rates fall--BOOM!
In other words, when the peasants and wage slaves feel financially secure and little girls get as good a basic k-12 education as little boys, birth rates come under control, all by themselves, without need for leftist-style government meddling. This has been well-documented. Just look at Europe. The populations within Europe whose birth rates are not falling are the populations that cling to anti-girl cultural norms and have the worst job prospects. Look at Japan--prosperity and education equal population shrinkage. After all, once you are aware of 1) how easy it is to control ones own fertility in the present day; 2) you have more than a few pennies to rub together after you pay your bills; and 3) just how much other stuff you could do with those extra pennies if you only have one or two kids instead of four or five, it's amazing how quickly birth rates fall.
It's a simple, non-leftist, behavioral calculus. Show people the net personal benefits of something, don't just tell them (right-wing-style moralizing doesn't work, either). They will probably adopt it.Sep 11 2013: Hi Bart, You have touched on many important, interrelated, topics. To dissect and respond to them all would take much more than 2000 characters.Some related, important concepts follow: Government fiscal stimulus always causes short term economic growth but not necessarily long term growth. Economic growth requires the consumption of natural resources. What is true of the multiplier effect associated with government stimulus is also true when government spending ceases. If the government spends one dollar on building a bridge, a portion of that money is spent on wages that are, in part, spent again, and so on. I cannot confirm what the multiplier is, but there is a multiplier. GerdSep 11 2013: stop this thought process and get me out of this super tribe i quit let me live alone in the woods for miles and miles without seeing another human but let me forever feel the collective consciousness. this is my wishSep 9 2013: Bryan: I would kindly ask that you find another conversation. Nobody here is advocating revolution. Nobody here is suggesting genocide. We live in a democracy. This is a marketplace for ideas and conversations based on a review of facts.
You remind me of people I heard suggesting that Obama was going to round everyone up into "FEMA re-education camps." Perhaps you forgot your medication today, perhaps not. I don't know. I do think you're a bit paranoid.
Relax. I hope you'll be OK.Sep 9 2013: Petroleum is a limited resource. You seem to believe that you have telepathic powers and everyone who doesn't blindly bow down to your dogmas must automatically be among your doctrinal enemies. Pie-in-the-sky fantasies are all well-and-good, but if you want to implement them, you must either be willing to kill a lot of people or wait until things really crash. It's how humans do things. Are you ready and willing to implement the slaughter that would be necessary to force "improvement" before reality forces it upon us?
People do not easily go along with cultural revolutions--and cultural revolutions always, without exception, become instruments of tyranny. Evolution, on the other hand, need not be tyrannical, but evolution is, by its very nature as "evolution" and not "development" is STOCHASTIC, indeed, one could potentially argue that it is a truly random process (if such things actually exist at the macro level). Thus, it may have direction, but only post-hoc. We can plan and hope, we can work out contingencies, but when we try to force them upon others, we end up getting down to shooting.
We are, ultimately, still African plains-dwelling apes. Misguided attempts to pretend that we are not have always ended in failure or disaster: Pol Pot's "Year Zero". Mao's "Cultural Revolution", New Harmony (Indiana), Calvin's Geneva, Robespierre's reign of Terror, all started, or so they claim, to "improve" the lot of humans. New Harmony didn't end in slaughter, because the people had the ability to eventually opt out, but the rest, which were mandatory programs, did end in slaughter and repudiation.
Make your cake-eating world attractive enough, and people will implement it, but it will be a paradise for the elites. The wage peasants will not benefit. This is how "green" scenarios always pan out in the real world. Too many people, not enough space. How will we dispose of the "excess"?Sep 9 2013: Mike:
I have a very soft spot in my heart for Texas. I lived in San Angelo when I was a kid. You're right about the open spaces and so forth, but if you believe that Texas is somehow immune to climate change and resource depletion, I think you've missed my point. North Dakota is not immune. Utah and Wyoming are not immune.
To wit:
1. San Angelo now faces dire circumstances after several years of drought. They're basically down to 1 year's worth of water.
2. The Ogalalla Aquifer (a fossil aquifer with no recharge) is down to about 20 more years worth of supply. The US is heavily dependent on farm output from the states that harvest this water each year. Entirely unsustainable.
3. Bark Beetles have devastated Ponderosa Pine forests throughout the Western US, Utah and Wyoming included. This happened due to the winters not being cold enough to kill them each year.
I think you might want to be a little less snarky about California's problems. Climate Change knows no boundaries, sir. Neither do the economic effects of declining oil production if we don't act to reduce our demand.Sep 9 2013: So, who will you volunteer for extermination? This proposal will not work at current population levels. Factories require concentration of people. They are not pleasant to live next to, even if they are "green". Waste processing is also unpleasant. Farming without petroleum smells bad in summer. Suburbanites are the first to demand that smelly farms be shut down in their little "green" areas. Goods will still need transport. "Renewable" sources only work in some locales, not others. Who will shoot those who refuse to abandon their homes?
Sep 9 2013: Dear Bryan: I think your comment reflects a misunderstanding of what I'm saying, so let me ask you a couple questions:
Do you believe that oil production can increase in perpetuity? Do you believe that climate change is a hoax? You seem to believe that we can merely choose to continue business as usual without consequence. You then suggest that because I point out the problem that I have a death wish. That's pretty bad. I'm actually advocating for risk management given the facts.
My hope is that we'll develop strategies that accept the facts as they are and develop a rational response to "Manage the unavoidable and avoid the unmanageable." Your hostile remarks have a message embedded in them: "responding to these problems will involve limits and I hate limits."
James Howard Kunstler put it well. He said "eventually, we'll have a new negotiating partner. Reality. We won't even need to be in the negotiating room anymore."
Sep 9 2013: Petroleum is a limited resource. You seem to believe that you have telepathic powers and everyone who doesn't blindly bow down to your dogmas must automatically be among your doctrinal enemies. Pie-in-the-sky fantasies are all well-and-good, but if you want to implement them, you must either be willing to kill a lot of people or wait until things really crash. It's how humans do things. Are you ready and willing to implement the slaughter that would be necessary to force "improvement" before reality forces it upon us?
People do not easily go along with cultural revolutions--and cultural revolutions always, without exception, become instruments of tyranny. Evolution, on the other hand, need not be tyrannical, but evolution is, by its very nature as "evolution" and not "development" is STOCHASTIC, indeed, one could potentially argue that it is a truly random process (if such things actually exist at the macro level). Thus, it may have direction, but only post-hoc. We can plan and hope, we can work out contingencies, but when we try to force them upon others, we end up getting down to shooting.
We are, ultimately, still African plains-dwelling apes. Misguided attempts to pretend that we are not have always ended in failure or disaster: Pol Pot's "Year Zero". Mao's "Cultural Revolution", New Harmony (Indiana), Calvin's Geneva, Robespierre's reign of Terror, all started, or so they claim, to "improve" the lot of humans. New Harmony didn't end in slaughter, because the people had the ability to eventually opt out, but the rest, which were mandatory programs, did end in slaughter and repudiation.
Make your cake-eating world attractive enough, and people will implement it, but it will be a paradise for the elites. The wage peasants will not benefit. This is how "green" scenarios always pan out in the real world. Too many people, not enough space. How will we dispose of the "excess"?
Paul Lillebo
Sep 10 2013: You are of course right, Bryan, that population is the problem, but you really are ranting. No one is suggesting that a solution to that problem is "to kill a lot of people." You reduce the population by reducing birth rates - it takes many generations to make a dent.
- +2
Stephen's four "solutions" are all admirable but far from new goals. Implementing them will help a little bit. But there are a few hundred other, equally valid goals that we also need to make progress toward, dealing with transportation and energy use, food production and distribution, disease, education, housing, climate-related crises, conflicts, etc, etc. And underlying them all, making every problem we have more untractable, is the still-rapid human population growth that adds some 80 million people a year to the earth's population. Unless we deal with that in a rational way, we'll never keep up with the other fixes.Sep 9 2013: I guess this conversation is most focused on America. Not all of America, mostly California. The dire situations noted are not that big a problem in.... Utah or Wyoming. Not even applicable to North Dakota.
I see that some of this could come true in Texas in the next or maybe succeeding century, so we have time to "plant a tree".
But all these problems are really problematic in California. Fuel and Energy costs are high and going higher with brown outs and gas shortages looming. Huge food factories use every conceivable chemical to insure massive production and some that are not conceivable.
I wonder why there are "happy cows" in California.
Urban sprawl has paved over thousands of square miles of some of the most pristine lands in all of the US.
Air pollution has turned the skies yellow and environmental damage may be so much that even nature will not be able to repair.
Yes Sir, Mr Davis, you are in big trouble there in California. And I think there is little hope that those problems you have noted will be corrected by Californians.
Move to..... Plano, Texas. Clean air, low fuel prices, open space for gardens... the world as you would like it. And the natives are very friendly.
Sep 9 2013: Texas also has lots of sunlight and open space--lay out bazillions of solar cells and thin-layer algae farms that produce petroleum substitutes (corporations are actually doing this, right now). The coast is very windy--lots of wind farming going on.Sep 7 2013: No, I don't think "More walkable" or "less Sprawl" is the answer. We don't need incremental improvements. What we should do is completely redesign the city from the ground up. We are living in cities that were laid out at the beginning of the industrial revolution or even earlier. We have a 2 dimensional design that tends towards sprawl and waste. We should have a 3 dimensional design that is based on the technological revolution, modern telecommunications and smart technology. In addition the city should be designed to minimize the footprint, ultimately to 0. That would mean putting a high value on land, water, air, etc.
For example, we drive automobiles which are designed to travel at 50-60 mph and yet the average speed across a city like NYC is 15mph, this is a design error. Also, we can calculate the cost of services provided in a city based on the size of the city. Plumbing, electricity, internet increase in cost on a per foot basis. Once again, a clear error in the design of sprawl which is a direct result of a 2 dimensional grid.
Sep 7 2013: Thanks Stuart, I might also wish for a clean slate and a comprehensive redesign. When I say more walkable communities and less sprawl, that's simply a nod to reality. We live in a free society, not a command economy. We don't have consensus on the problem. We don't even have the majority acknowledging its scope or its implications. We can do magical things, however, by demonstrating well-designed communities and making them reality. Energy efficient community retrofits can: 1. Create good paying jobs. 2. Improve living standards. 3. Positively impact human health. 4. Lower living costs. 5. Lower Healthcare costs. 6. Decrease species loss 7. Improve air quality.
Converting existing communities from their existing structures to these involves creative redesign. There are examples of new urbanism being done.
Here's one from San Diego: http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/genplan/pilotvillage/paseo.shtml
Sep 8 2013: The society we live in is very quick to adopt technology that offers an order or magnitude in efficiency. Look at how quick the world adopted the internet.
China is building cities for 350 million people over the next couple of decades. If those cities offer a dramatic advantage economically then the rest of the world will have no choice but to follow suite. Old design cities will go bankrupt just like Detroit.Sep 7 2013: Yes there are solutions.
Below, Mitch SMith says, "The world is financially/contractually committed to destroy all life on this planet - the law cannot help us now."
It wasn't intended to or if it were, it has been changed to enable those who benefit from breaking the laws in all kinds of ways, for their benefit, namely profit, power and control.
Since the "law cannot help us (people), it is time to not obey it. That should have been abundantly clear for some time now.
Stuart Hameroff, an anesthesiologist and professor at the University of Arizona known for his studies of consciousness, had a TEDx talk in Brussels in 2010. It was titled, "Do we have a quantum soul?" and he began with a statement that quantum mechanics can save the world. Next, he (to me, very quickly and misleadingly, in fact I believe it is intentional deception, just casually slipped in), listed "over-crowding, hatred, wars, terrorism, all basically overdue to overpopulation", adding, "disease, lack of food and energy, pollution and global warming, lack of purpose and meaning." It was this casual statement delivered in a manner that this was the truth, the reason and cause for our global problems - " all basically overdue to overpopulation", that got me.
Our problems such as you are addressing in this topic, come not from global over-population but almost solely from the mismanagement of the earths resources and the insane and ludicrous belief that any one person, corporation, country or government should be able to or have "the right" to own or control them. Hence, our problems arise from this as all humans work not for money, but for their share of the earths resources that their meager money can buy for survival. There is enough, managed properly, for all life on the planet, as the resources were here, free, for all forms on earth.
The only way to change this and stop an apocalypse of any sort is to take the power away from those who have it, they who only want destruction, fear and death.


text:
The micro tubing assembly for series 7000 and 8000 Dan micro sprinklers includes a large choice of configurations to meet all application requirements, with micro tubing assemblies from 12" up to 60". (Dan micro sprinklers are currently carried by NaanDan Jain Irrigation.)
Copyright © 2010 The Drip Store. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use . Contact us . Privacy Notice
The Drip Store
980 Park Center, Ste. E
Vista, CA 92081
Tel: 760-597-1669 : Toll Free: 877-597-1669 Fax: 760-597-1673
Business Hours: M-F, 7 AM - 4 PM (PST)
We are not a retail store, we do offer will call during checkout for local customers.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Classic Round Tufted Upholstered Ottoman
Our tufted ottoman's tailored skirt is as smart as it looks, concealing a full-diameter storage shelf behind its crisp box pleats.
- Makes a welcome addition to the nursery, serving as extra seating, soft-sided support for little ones just learning to stand – even an impromptu changing surface
- Expertly crafted with a kiln-dried hardwood frame
- Generously padded with a plush, tufted cushion top
- Tailored with a box-pleated skirt that conceals a full-diameter storage shelf
- Upholstered in stain-resistant fabric
- Stocked in sand and dove Belgian linen and fog vintage velvet. All other options available via special order.
Shown in dove Belgian linen.
Classic Round Tufted Upholstered Ottoman
- 30" diam., 17"H
Classic Round Tufted Upholstered Ottoman
Classic Round Tufted Velvet Ottoman


text:
Ewer with Cover
Celadon ceramics of the Goryeo dynasty (918–1392) are among the most celebrated works of Korean art. Their luminous green color is the result of iron in both the clay and the glaze oxidizing in a reduction kiln.
The Brooklyn ewer is a world-famous piece, celebrated for its dynamic naturalistic form, superb glaze color, and meticulous detailing. Few surviving Korean celadons can boast such elaborate and delicate carving. The body, lid, and knob of the ewer are all in the form of lotuses, and the handle is a lotus stalk tied at the top with reeds. The cover and handle were originally joined by a chain, now marked by two loops, which are placed where a gold-painted butterfly on the cover would have connected with the insect's pupa on the handle, both modeled in delicate relief. Dots of white slip accentuate the ornamental motifs, while glaze pools in the deeper carving to create a range of tones on the surface.
- Medium: Stoneware with underglaze slip decoration and celadon glaze
- Place Made: Korea
- Dates: first half of the 12th century
- Dynasty: Goryeo Dynasty
- Dimensions: 9 7/8 x 9 1/2 x 5 1/2 in. (25.1 x 24.1 x 14 cm) (show scale)
- Markings: None
- Signature: Unsigned
- Inscriptions: None
- Collections:Asian Art
- Museum Location: This item is not on view
- Accession Number: 56.138.1a-b
- Credit Line: Gift of Mrs. Darwin R. James III
- Rights Statement: Creative Commons-BY
- Caption: Ewer with Cover, first half of the 12th century. Stoneware with underglaze slip decoration and celadon glaze, 9 7/8 x 9 1/2 x 5 1/2 in. (25.1 x 24.1 x 14 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Mrs. Darwin R. James III, 56.138.1a-b. Creative Commons-BY
- Image:
- Catalogue Description: From "Korean Art Collection in the Brooklyn Museum" catalogue. The lotiform body is carved with a design of overlapping lotus petals framing leaf sprays. A pulled handle in the form of a lotus stalk is elegantly tied at the top with reeds. The cover is in the shape of an inverted lotus blossom, while the knob of the lid re-creates a lotus bud just beginning to unfurl. The cover and handle were originally joined by a chain, now marked by two loops, which are placed where a butterfly sitting on the cover would have connected with the insect's pupa on the handle. Dots of white slip accentuate the ornamental motifs. This decorative technique marks the earliest celadon wares of the twelfth century, just prior to the development of the slip inlay technique. This ewer's body is in the shape of a lotus blossom. The flower petals are arranged in four tiers, and carved in relief while the veins on the flower petals are incised. The band of lotus petals contains a honeysuckle design further embellished with dots in white slip. The lid is also decorated with three tiers of lotus petals with white slip coating, relief carving, and incision. The knob on the lid takes the shape of a lotus bud, which is accompanied by a butterfly made of white clay. Uniquely, the butterfly forms a pair with the triangular lotus leaf attached to the handle of the body. The butterfly appliqué is attached to a ring by which the ewer would have been connected to its matching cover. The shapes of the spout, handle, and foot are derived from a bamboo motif and sumptuously decorated by the techniques of incision, slip coating, and appliqué. The absence of the Goryeo dynasty's unique inlay technique shows that the ewer was made in the mid-twelfth century. The highly refined clay body and glazing, use of silica for kiln stacking, general figure of the ewer, and the various techniques used for decoration make it a truly fine work of art.
- Record Completeness: Best (94%)


text:
WegoWise provides an industry-leading web-based utility analytics platform for the building-performance industry. Bridging big data and energy efficiency, WegoWise distills large aggregations of energy and water data into useful, actionable information for building owners, managers, energy auditors and building efficiency programs, enabling them to automatically track, understand and benchmark building performance, and make better efficiency investment decisions. WegoWise's platform regularly identifies impressive opportunities for cost savings, as inefficient buildings typically pay four times the utility costs of efficient buildings. Screen Shots
Energy Star Benchmark, building benchmark, M&V, energy efficiency, energy tracking.
WegoWise maintains the world's largest database for multifamily building utility data—currently, more than 16,000 buildings—which it uses to create a proprietary benchmark for multifamily buildings. The quality and breadth of this database enables better building comparisons and more statistically significant insights. For all other building types, WegoWise utilizes EPA's Portfolio Manager benchmarks.
Expertise Required
WegoWise's platform presents information in clear, actionable charts and graphs. Due to the simple set-up, no special expertise or training is required, and the charts and graphs are easy to understand for nontechnical and managerial audiences.
WegoWise currently has more than 1,000 users across the United States and Canada.
WegoWise provides a scalable energy efficiency platform for residential and commercial building owners and managers, energy service providers and auditors, engineering firms, energy consultants and utility efficiency programs. Additionally, WegoWise seamlessly integrates into the Environmental Protection Agency's Portfolio Manager program, eliminating time that users affected by new building energy disclosure ordinances spend uploading utility bills for compliance.
Users simply answer a few basic questions about their buildings, like age and construction type and then WegoWise's platform then automatically collects utility data, normalizes and compares buildings by energy intensity (e.g., btu per square foot), building characteristics and weather, and presents the information in clear, actionable charts and graphs—no data entry required.
These reports are designed to be clear and easy-to-understand, and includeReports include information on building energy benchmarks, measurement and verification of building upgrades, and comparative statistics and charts to prioritize poorly performing buildings across a portfolio. These reports also include performance compared to WegoWise's proprietary multi-family energy benchmarks, as well as the EPA's Energy Star scores. Additionally, WegoWise's output seamlessly integrates with EPA Portfolio Manager to comply with utility data disclosure regulations and other uses.
Computer Platform
Cloud Based Software as Service
Programming Language
Ruby on Rails
WegoWise uses the abundance of data points that utilities and bill payers already have, with an affordable, easy-to-implement platform that can scale across entire real estate portfolios. The platform's easy to digest charts and graphs clearly present portfolio-level insight, allowing managers to quickly benchmark their buildings against other buildings in the WegoWise platform. Using this information, owners and managers can quickly identify their least efficient buildings—which could benefit the most from audits and targeted upgrades—and prioritize retrofits. Rather than costly smart grid deployments, elaborate building management systems or complicated sensor networks, the WegoWise platform provides universal building intelligence without additional equipment, democratizing energy efficiency for buildings of all types and resources. Additionally, WegoWise automatically integrates into Portfolio Manager and eliminates the time staff have to spend uploading utility bills—making complying with energy data disclosure regulations quick and painless. WegoWise's benefits extend post-retrofit as well. Traditional measurement and verification requires meter installation and on-site engineers and consultants—which can add up to 10 percent to project costs and overhead. WegoWise enables whole-building remote measurement and verification by regressing utility data against historic weather data to develop models of buildings' baseline energy consumption. Comparing utility data post-upgrade illuminates whole-building savings at a fraction of the cost of traditional techniques.
WegoWise does not connect directly to BAS/EMS systems—the platform's core model relies on utility bill data. With most utilities providing data online, it's easier than ever before to access years of historic usage and billing history, powering WegoWise's low-touch universal platform. Instead of granular single-building information, WegoWise powers broad, sweeping and actionable insights at the scale real estate professionals need.
201 South Street
617-367-9346 ext 203
WegoWise is currently commercially available, with demos and 30-day free trials available by appointment through website. While prices vary by building, at time of submission WegoWise is $72/building/year for WegoPro and $288/building/year for WegoPremium. The most up-to-date pricing can be found at https://www.wegowise.com/pricing.


text:
For EIAs, ELISAs, and other protein binding assays, use the Costar 96-well flat-bottom EIA plate. These plates bind more protein with greater uniformity than any other plate.
What is the education discount policy?
For more than 15 years, Bio-Rad has made science education a major priority. To support this effort, the company has implemented a discount policy that allows high school and college teaching laboratories to purchase kits, instruments, reagents, and other equipment at preferred prices.
How do I apply for the education discount?
If you are an educator at the high school or college level, visit our Education Discount Policy page to establish an education account number.
Box of 20 packages, 5 high binding enzyme immunoassay plates per package (100 plates), polystyrene
Sorry, an error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please call {0} for assistance.


text:
'Writing to Learn'Event Details: 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m., October 03, Allied Health Professions Building, 3437 Caroline Mall, St. Louis, MO, 63104-1111
The Paul C. Reinert, S.J., Center for Teaching Excellence presents the first event in its 2011-2012 Conversations on Teaching series, "Writing to Learn."
Bring your lunch and share in the conversation from noon-1 p.m., either on Monday, Oct. 3, on the Health Sciences Campus in room 1023 C of the Allied Health Professions Building, or on Tuesday, Oct. 4, in the Knight's Room in Pius XII Memorial Library.
During this brown-bag session, teaching faculty are invited to reflect on and share knowledge and concerns regarding the types of writing incorporated in courses, as well as how and why students learn from completing various writing projects.


text:
Announcements from the Rep
If you are ordering any announcement products (announcements, senior clothing, keepsakes, etc.) you can do so at anytime online. However, the normal timeframe to order a CAP & GOWN has passed. PLEASE CONTACT OUR LOCAL OFFICE TO ORDER YOUR CAP & GOWN: 585-377-4778 or email@example.com Thank you very much! JOSTENS - FITCH OFFICE


text:
Two of the themes in Joni Page's life were established at an early age. "I wanted a convertible," Joni recalls, "like Nancy Drew had." Given that Joni had also established an affinity for vintage Corvette roadsters, that's the direction her drop-top dreams took, eventually being fulfilled in the form of this triple-black '93 convertible. It probably wouldn't be a stretch to say that the fictional detective influenced Ms. Page's choice of occupation as well, given she is also known as Animal Services Officer Joni Page of the Santa Ana, California, Police Department.
After earning a degree in criminal justice from California State University, Fullerton, Joni started off her law enforcement career by working in the Santa Ana city jail. After three years of helping to keep locked-up Southern California criminals in check, Joni decided to make a change, and transferred to the Animal Services section of the Santa Ana Police Department. "I like it," she says of the position she's held for two years. "There are hard days, and it's sad sometimes." No doubt Joni is thinking of a recent case, where she had to remove 81 cats and one dog from a one-bedroom apartment-all were too ill to be saved. On the other hand, there are the animals that can be helped, and that's what Joni focuses on, saying, "I like it 'cause of the animals I deal with."
One small downside to the job, however, is Officer Page's daily conveyance, which she refers to as "The Doggie Wagon." It may be well suited to the job, but, for a person whose idea of a nice ride is a Corvette convertible, piloting a paddy wagon leaves a bit to be desired in the driving excitement department. "The public watches," Joni has observed, "so you can't really put the pedal to the metal." That desire for something with the proper "oomph" was fulfilled last year-of course, the pedal in question was touching fiberglass rather than metal when pushed to the floor.
Joni's partner in Corvette crime was (and is) her husband, Jason. Jason had owned a '77 Corvette prior to meeting Joni. Though the Shark was long gone, the memories and desire were still there. "He was into it," Joni recalls, "and that was cool with me." After the couple married, careers were started (Jason minds the store at Page by Page, the duo's audio book rental and sales business), a daughter, Alexandra, born, and of course, Corvettes were dreamed of the whole time. They finally took the plunge last summer.
"It wasn't a conscious decision," Joni remembers. "We were always looking in the Auto Trader, but figured we couldn't afford it." That assumption was quickly reversed during the couple's first trip to Corvette Mike's Anaheim, California, showroom. "We happened to be in the area and decided to stop by, as we had never been there," Joni tells us. "The car was screaming to come home with us...it took about two minutes to decide."
The car in question was a triple-black '93 convertible, stock except for Borla mufflers and chrome ZR-1-style wheels, and showing just over 20,000 miles on the clock. The deal was made, and the Pages immediately set out to give their new black beauty a bit of attitude. Plastic surgery was performed by adding a high-rise hood and an ACI rear wing, both from the Corvette Central catalog. The engine is stock for the most part. The LT1 breathes through an opened-up airbox and K&N filter; out back, the Borlas were replaced with a pair of muffler eliminator pipes. A 2,700-rpm stall speed torque converter and 3.75:1 gears hint at the Page's future plans for their Vette-we'll get to that in a moment.


text:
Skip to Section Subnavigation Skip to Page Content
For first-year and transfer students.
Associate and bachelor's degree programs for men and women 4 full years out of high school.
Elementary, middle level and secondary certification for men and women with a bachelor's degree.
Skip to Page Content
The Wilson College softball team brought home 3 wins from their season opening tournament, the Peace College Triangle Classic in Raleigh, NC.
The Wilson College softball team brought home 3 wins from their season opening tournament, the Peace College Triangle Classic in Raleigh, NC. Wilson opened the 2012 season on Friday, February 24th going 1-1 for the day. The Phoenix beat St. Augustine 14-11, however suffered a 10-0 loss to Eastern Mennonite. On Saturday, Wilson went 2-0 earning wins over Mary Baldwin College (15-4) and Peace College (8-0).
Sophomore, Megan Schneck (Bethel, Pa./ Tulpehocken) turned in an outstanding performance for the Phoenix, going 8 for 15 at the plate with six runs scored, three RBIs, and three stolen bases, with a .533 batting average and a .600 slugging percentage. Schneck was named the North Eastern Athletic Conference (NEAC) softball student-athlete of the week for her efforts
Juniors, Leigh Roche (Hanover, Pa./ New Oxford) and Nicole Musser (Middletown, Va./ Sherando) split time on the mound for Wilson. Roche recorded 2 wins for the Phoenix, allowing only 20 hits, 15 runs, and recording 16 strike outs. Musser went 1-1, with 18 hits, 10 runs, and 11 strike outs.
On Thursday, March 8th, Wilson will take on Hood College in the Phoenix home opener.


text:
Contact What on EarthWe want to hear from you! If you would like to request a catalog, please use our catalog request form.
Prefer us to email you? That's fine. Just fill out the form below. The fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
What on Earth
5581 Hudson Industrial Parkway
PO Box 2599
Hudson, OH 44236
United States of America
Ordering (24 hrs.): 1-844-250-3401
Fax: 1-800-950-9569
Customer Service: 1-800-441-2242
E-Mail us


text:
I recently had some ice cream because my 10 year old really likes it when I have dessert with her.
Is there anyone else out there who follows the vegan diet 95% of the time but has moments where they allow a little dairy? No meat, just a little treat like ice cream or cake during a special occasion?
If you are cheating once in a while with dairy you are actually sabotaging your vegan diet. dairy contains casomorphines that are highly addictive. Cut dairy out all together and you will be happier and more satisfied in the long run. Most ice cream or yogurt shops offer a dairy free version of sorbet. I too used to struggle with this but realized if a vegan diet is good for me it is also good for the entire family, everyone is vegan now and healthier and happier for it, what better gift can you give your child?
also So Delicious makes an amazing ice cream in a variety of flavors, they also carry ice cream bars. I keep those in the freezer and my kids friends LOVE them! There are so many wonderful dairy free options, no need for you to pass up dessert!
Trader Joes carries soy ice cream at a very good price. It is still a pricey, high-fat treat, but it satisfies my kids ice cream longing. I usually use it to make ice cream sandwiches with my homemade low-fat, whole grain, naturally sweetened cookies.
Yes, I have a few bites of cake just so I'm not a total Debbie Downer at special occasions. The ice cream is easier for me to pass up.
I agree with the above posts. Yes its cheating to have ice cream on a vegan diet, yes there are lovely soy ice creams etc.
BUT my advise for what its worth is to just do the best you can and don't worry - 95% vegan is better than a 100% SAD diet and to me its about making changes we can live with - not making things so hard we give up trying.
I try to be vegan but for me its probably only 98%-99% of the time if I am totally honest and I doubt I am the only one. It is easy to be vegan at home but when I dine out I don't quiz the chef non stop about every single item (whether the chef is a friend, family member or restaurant). I have not eaten meat for years and skip any obvious dairy such as grilled cheese. However if, for example, I were given a bread roll or some dish with a little milk or cheese in it then so be it. I will eat, enjoy the company of those I am eating with and be thankful to have a lovely meal that someone took the time preparing for me. Like catbear, I will also have the odd piece of cake on special occasions knowing its not vegan.
Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food - Hippocrates.
As you learn new recipes you might also want to start researching the impact that your choices have on the animals. For me this isn't a diet that I might "cheat" on but a lifestyle choice to do my best not to harm other animals. You might want to watch "Peaceable Kingdom" which is a beautiful movie about Farmers who turn their farms into animal sanctuaries. Or maybe "Farm to Fridge" - only 4 minutes but will open your eyes! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THIODWTqx5E
So Delicious also makes a coconut milk based frozen dessert for those who might want to avoid the heavy amount of soy in a soy milk based treat. We LOVE the chocolate variety. The price of it makes it a once in a while treat, which helps in other ways as well (like not over-indulging in a higher fat and sugar treat).
HeidiW wrote:
Thanks, but I am not doing this based on the injustice done to animals. I am looking out for my health. Don't get me wrong, I understand some animals are mistreated in the meat industry, which is why I always looked for free range products when I did eat meat, but at the end of the day, they are just, well, animals.
Hi FreeByForty, I am with you on this one. I been 100% for 3 months but recently start eating ice cream once in a while. I found, while being vegan, that I have intolerance to soya and ice cream made of banana or mango just doesn't always cut it. So yes I 'cheat' but I don't see it that way. I see it that I cut out a lot of animal products from my diet and like you FreeByForty I am doing this for my health. I live in the UK and there is no GOOD no diary ice cream anyway.
Hana wrote:
Thanks Hana. To be honest, upon starting this diet, I thought I would really miss meat, especially things like burgers and cheesesteaks! But, I find I do not crave anything like that. The only thing I want to allow myself to have is beloved ice cream! There simply is no substitute for the real deal.
I love So Delicious chocolate dessert and to me, it is truly delicious and is more satisfying to me than ice cream. I started with the 21 day vegan kickstart in order to prevent health problems. However, as I became educated and when I started to really listen to what people were saying about animals, I couldn't keep my head in the sand anymore. It is clear to me that there is really something very important about what animal advocates are saying. As my 21-year-old cat just died, I see her as more than just an animal. Although she couldn't speak a human language, she could communicate and she needed my love and care. I was glad to be there for her in her old age. I see all the other animals as more than just animals too. I have respect and compassion for them.
Message deleted.
Wash your back
Thank you Theodore for your kind words about my cat. That was so touching. Even recently, the vet said she was the healthiest 21 and a half-year-old cat he'd ever seen. And yes, all she ate the last years of her life was vet-prescribed low-protein cat food.
theodore wrote:
Hi Theodore,thank you for the great tip. I had Booja Booja chocolates before and they are soo tasty. I didn't even think that they also make ice cream! I will look out for this ice cream
Glad to hear there are options for non-dairy ice cream. I tried the So Delicous made from coconut milk and did not like it at all. It's tough trying a vegan diet when you don't like coconut or onions! I had the same disdain for mushrooms but I am starting to come around!
Sounds good, wish they had booja booja in the states!
I agree! I was looking at all the wonderful goodies on their website. Maybe it is a good thing they're not in the US after all since I don't need another temptation. We'll have to enjoy vicarously through Theodore's Booja-Booja indulgences. Maple sounds delicious!
There are 180 active user sessions right now.
home | contact
us | about us | support us | full disclaimer | privacy policy
PCRM Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
5100 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Ste. 400, Washington, DC 20016
Phone: 202-686-2210 | E-mail: email@example.com


text:
Offering maximum versatility, the Philips Advance family of SmartMate ballasts for 4-pin compact fluorescent lamps drive a broad range of fluorescent lamps. The Advance ICF-2S13-H1-LD electronic fluorescent ballast operates (2) 10 Watt CFL lamps at 120/277 input volts. Ideal for use in normal light areas, this programmed start ballast is typically used in offices, board rooms, and retail. Also operates (1 or 2) 10 Watt CFS10W/GR10Q, (1 or 2) 16 Watt CFS16W/GR10q, or (1 or 2) 13 Watt CFTR13W/GX24Q Plug-in CFLs.
Offering maximum versatility, Advance's SmartMate electronic ballasts for 4-pin compact fluorescent lamps drive a broad range of quad and triple-tube, circline, 2D, and long twin-tube lamps.
Representing an innovative breakthrough in CFL ballast technology, SmartMate's energy-efficient design, compact and lightweight housing, and user-friendly features make SmartMate an ideal choice for fixture manufacturers, retrofitters, and MRO replacement.