text:
- Katrina Holcomb
- Eugene, OR
- United States
student of biology, University of Oregon
This conversation is closed.
Will the Belo Monte Dam project on the Amazon River cause more harm to the environment or will it be a good source of energy for Brazil?
The Amazon rainforest is an internationally recognized epicenter of biodiversity. Countless campaigns to stop the cutting and burning these rainforests have fallen on deaf ears. Now the Brazilian government plans to build what would be the world's 3rd largest dam [1] on the beautiful and ancient Amazon River. The Belo Monte project would span the Xingu River with 3 different dams: 233MW Pimental, 233MW Bela Vista, and 11,000MW Belo Monte. In addition, two artificial canals must be built to divert the river, which together will span more area than the Panama Canal.
These dams will have a myriad of negative impacts on the local environment. Construction of the dam will cause about 400-640 sq km land upstream to become flooded for a reservoir - an area equal to the size of Chicago. The town of Altamira will be flooded as well as countless acres that house the region's tribal populations. The impact on biodiversity includes 6-8 species of fish endemic to the Amazon River that will likely go extinct as well as a 2% decrease in the total forested area of the Amazon rainforest.
Organisms endangered by the construction of Belo Monte cannot verbalize their traumatic destruction of their ecosystem, but the indigenous people of the Amazon can; they are currently protesting the construction of the Belo Monte project through an "occupy" movement.
Belo Monte project is the first of many dam projects planned for the Brazilian portion of the Amazon River. Do these indigenous people have a right to decide what happens to their ancestral homeland? Or is the Brazilian government in the right by providing power for the majority of their country? Will the Belo Monte become the Belo "Muerte" dam (aka dam of death)?
Here's a 10 minute video that covers the impact the Belo Monte dam on the Amazon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-seAAIsJLQ [1]
Related articles:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/03/brazil-dam-activists-war-military [2]
May 14 2013: Hello all,
I think many great points were covered in this conversation so I am not going to repeat arguments. But I do think there are some crucial things we have to think about here. First, Brazil has been playing a dangerous game of doing one thing and then manipulating numbers to seem like a different thing. Our gov claims that inflation is under control when we know it is not, but they manipulate number to look that way (Financial Times has an article on this). The same happens to the environment; Gov swears that impacts of Belo Monte are minor both to biodiversity and to indigenous people, while any minimally informed person knows this is a blunt lie. There is a concern to play good guys for the international community while doing the oposite here. So yes, Belo Monte will have a major impact. Another issue is why it is being built there. Of course we need progress and energy, but it is a trade here. Energy for the population and some environmental impact? May be ok. However, in this case, it is not energy for rural communities, it is for minning industries. And not a minor environmental impact, it is huge, and plus the social impact. Do we really want to make this choice?
Thirdly, the social impacts are not just the direct ones. The construction itself brought approx 28 thousand workers to an otherwise small town. Just see what happened to Tucurui after they had a hydroeletric powerplant built there. Huge unemployment after construction was over, not enough schools and hospitals, diseases and pregnant teenagers. Also, look at Brazil´s wastes on old transmition lines. Some say it is around 50% of the production. Lastly, let´s just look at who is behind this billion dollar contract. Oddly enough the same companies who fund political campaigns and paid (and have been paying) travels to politicians and much more. This is just an economic game for them. They helped put politicians on power, now they get there share.This is much more than just energy needs.
Jon Cox
May 14 2013: Hello Juliana,
- +3
Thank you so much for the insightful post. Politics and greed are driving this project forward in the face of intense, justified opposition. It is almost unbelievable...
May 14 2013: I agree, it is unbelievable. The fact that this project is even being considered with everything known about what it will do blows my mind...May 15 2013: The whole thing seems more like a world epidemic where our paradigm needs a drastic shift. It also reminds me of the problems going on between organizations and the Japanese government over whaling.
I think projects like this dam stress the importance of placing a monetary value on ecosystem services. There is a lot of stigma surrounding this kind of thing, but it may be the only way to make an impact. Maybe the Brazilian government should be charged for the ecosystem services they destroy.
http://www.economist.com/debate/sponsor/214/Dow%20ChemicalMay 14 2013: So, it basically comes down to those who have money throwing it around to get more money and in the process they end up not thinking about anyone else when they do it?May 15 2013: Thanks for the insight, Juliana!
I was wondering if you could maybe tell us more about what kind of attention this issue is getting locally within Brazil? Is public opinion leaning one way or another, or is there more of an even split? Also how much attention is it getting? Is this something that is being discussed by major news outlets regularly or is it being willfully ignored?
Vesta Tsao
May 14 2013: Eugene ourselves, most of our electricity power is so "clean" and cheap because of hyropower from BPA. However, We heard too much stories about hyrdopower and its impact on biodiversity. In the high biodiversity and species dynamic area such as Amazon forest. I can not image what would happen if Belo Monte dam project get built. Haven't we learned enough from past lessons? Three Gorges Dam which caused many old historical buildings and statues disappeared in China. Moreover, the dam caused 57% of plant species endangered and deforestation (Wu,2003). Another recent research about dam building activities in India also showed that "almost 90% of the Himalayan valleys would be affected by dam building and that 27% of these dams would affect dense forests with unique biodiversity." (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130117105659.htm)
- +5
Brazil does have large potential to design a scalable renewable energy, such as wind and solar. Brazil has the cheapest and successful wind energy in the world however it is not stable and they have to use coal-fired power plant to achieve stable energy in grid system. If they would invest more money on transmit full energy generated by wind and store them. Also, postponed the Belo Monte Dam project after complete and understand the full research of impacts on biodiversity and indigenous tribes.
Brazil is hosting 2 largest world sport event in 2014 and 2016. This might be the reasons they are highly desired to build a huge hyropower plant to sustain the energy usage. However, maybe building a more energy efficient stadiums and well-planed city transportation would be better than building a monster that will affect millions of people and species?
Wu, Jianguo, et al. "Three-Gorges Dam— Experiment in Habitat Fragmentation?" Science 300-5623 (May 23, 2003): 1239–1240.
Mario R
May 14 2013: I agree Vesta, as the attached video mentioned, Brazil could potentially reduce their energy demand by ~40% by 2020 if they focused on more energy efficiency. This switch alone would be able to account for the energy produced by 14 Belo Monte dam complexes. The Belo Monte Dam project alone racks up a massive 17 billion dollars for the entirety of the complex. If focused on more renewable energy, like the recent development in solar power, I think that Brazil could potentially negate the need for the construction of the Belo Monte Dam Complex. This new solar power breakthrough embeds voltaic cells on thin polymer plastic. These solar panels are effectively light, and easily maneuverable making them an excellent incorporation into isolated areas. They can also be used to power electronics and automobiles reducing both the demand for energy and the carbon emissions produced by fossil fuels. If even a small amount of the budget from the Belo Monte Dam project was diverted to green research projects such as this, great leaps can be made to neutralize the need for the dam complex.
- +3
May 14 2013: Yes! Definitely, more green research than complicated Dam project. That is so awesome solar panels are light and easy to use in daily life. It seems generating on site energy it should be implanted more into the design and build environment. :)
Erik Parker
May 14 2013: Vesta, you make a really good point about Brazil hosting the world cup and Olympics in the coming years. I think that if the indigenous peoples of the region are able to use that increased global exposure to spread their message it would greatly benefit their cause. As one of the members of the exclusive G-20 "club" it is clear that Brazil is a major emerging power in the world today, and as such is most likely very sensitive about issues regarding their international perception. Them disregarding the rights of the indigenous peoples living in the Amazon would be quite the black mark if picked up on by major news media outlets. The point being, I think there is still hope that the construction of this ill-advised dam can be averted.
- +2
This would be best done though if the Brazilian government was aware of the benefit in investing in energy strategies like the ones posed above by Mario which would not just save them money, but also make them out to be an extremely progressive nation. In the end I think that's the best bet at alleviating this situation, playing up the international relations angle.
May 14 2013: Exactly Erik, I totally agree with you. If this dam get postponed this year. Next year people from all over the world will be in Brazil and support the indigenous people and Amazon rain forest. And as you said, this will be great opportunity for them to gain support from international community. If Brazilian government can weight the consequences of short-term and long term benefits on tourism, green energy technology and good reputation for their country. I believe there will be better way than building this project!May 14 2013: Another great point made by Vesta is the fact that wind energy, although renewable, can probably not support the extractive industries that will be otherwise powered by the Belo Monte dam. The necessary energy to power the nearby mining industry seems to exceed the energy that can be provided by renewables, which makes me think that the Brazilian government should reduce the number of allowed mines in the Para state. Mines could either be reduced in total number or just moved to different areas around Brazil. This could potentially reduce losses to biological diversity as more clean energy would be used to power "dirty" industry.
Eun Min
May 14 2013: Definitely, I agree with you. The biggest problem is we don't learn from the past lessons which is the most important to prevent a tragic event. So sad.May 14 2013: An article was just published today about an indigenous group that is installing wind turbines themselves to prove to the Brazilian government that wind power is a viable alternative to hydroelectric dams. Here is a great quote from the article:
- 0
"Key to this is that the Makuxi installed the turbines themselves, so they know the technology and can fix it if it goes wrong. Other similar projects that use solar power have struggled because, unsurprisingly, giving people technology they don't fully understand leaves them unable to repair it when it breaks. Many tribal communities living in the Amazon region are excellent candidates for solar power on paper, but a combination of governmental disinterest and improper NGO and development implementation has scuppered its adoption."
This is a fantastic example of human agency. It's easy to talk about issues like this in terms of who is doing what to indigenous peoples, but between the "occupy" movement and building wind turbines, the indigenous people of the Amazon have displayed their agency clearly and strongly.
May 14 2013: What a great article. The Belo Monte Dam project is an incredible anecdote for describing the energy paradox that is occurring across the globe. If the indigenous groups can overcome the government, this would be a rare and important defeat. The following quote is especially exciting to me:
"In February, the Indigenous Council of Roraima, the Socioenvironmental Institute and the Federal University of Maranhão worked together to install three wind turbines in the territory to measure wind speeds over the course of a year, and verify the viability of wind power as an alternative to hydroelectricity."
If Brazil can identify wind energy as being just as productive as hydro, then perhaps they may serve as a model for the rest of the world, which currently searches for energy sources.
May 14 2013: This could be especially powerful when you take into account the article that Chelsea posted below, which says that with reduced precipitation from deforestation, the dam may only produce a quarter of the energy that was originally projected.May 14 2013: It seems like the government would be excited by the possibility of having to make just an initial investment (technology and possible instruction on how it works and how to fix it), while leaving upkeep and repairs to the local populations. This would lower their costs, lower risks to local ecosystems, and prevent the displacement of thousands of people.
Noel Laporte
May 14 2013: Up until April 2013 at least 800,000 dams have been constructed worldwide. Dams can provide positive and negative benefits to the nearby communities and ecosystems in which they reside. Dams deliver clean energy, water storage and the ability to control floods. Given the right implementation and location dams can have hugely positive effects for a society and have low operational costs. Although some dams can bring positive changes upon construction the plan to build the Belo Monte Dam is a very poor decision. Building a dam in the heart of the Amazon creates huge ecosystem destruction and massive land change. An estimated 85% of Brazils electrical energy that is produced comes from renewable hydroelectric dams throughout the country. Although energy independence is key for a country, the addition of the Belo Monte dam would cause massive environmental disturbance. This dam would affect local animals and the Bacajá Indigenous area by redirecting water due to flooding and reservoir location. Redirecting such great water volumes from the natural geographical inclination will either, strip land areas of water or over saturate them. Droughts, floods, deforestation, redistribution of species and displacement of indigenous species are all expected if the dam is completed. Dam completion would negatively affect many biomes and trophic levels at a magnitude never seen before in the Amazon basin. I believe alternative energy strategies could be implemented in Brazil to meet its energy needs without destroying the amazon basin. Solar, wind and tidal renewable energy strategies all could create renewable energy without impacting the environment in such a drastic way. Only through listening to the indigenous people can the government make a decision that both benefits the people and the growth of the country.
- +2
May 15 2013: I also think alternative energy strategies that don't impact the environment so severely need to be implemented in Brazil. But an interesting problem comes up when choosing an energy source that has the lest affect on the environment. What do we designate as "acceptable"? This goes back to your TED conversation about renewable energy sources. Wind turbines kill 573,000 birds a year in the US alone according to the Associated Press (1). Imagine the effect on the numerous tropical and endemic birds in the amazon basin. Solar power doesn't harm the environment directly, but the production of PV cells requires toxic and carcinogenic materials such Arsenic and polysilicone. Although we dont know much about the environmental impact of tidal power, we can learn from similar technologies such as conventional hydropower and wind power that tidal power will also have negative effects on the environment. With that said, how do we determine what degree of impact is acceptable? Do we choose a number that we determine is an acceptable amount of species lost per year? Or some other measure of species loss? Its difficult to say which form of renewable energy is the best alternative. Maybe there are certain strategies that have less impact in certain types of environments. Hydroelectric dams in the Amazon does however have too great of an impact on the environment to be deemed "acceptable".
1. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_WIND_ENERGY_EAGLE_DEATHS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-05-14-07-57-59
Robby Fung
May 14 2013: I am personally against this dam, but we must also think of the international problems it creates by taking an active approach to the construction. Is it really in our right to demand certain things from the Brazilian Government in regards to how they want to run their own country? Given the fact that the environment is the world's responsibility and we should all be doing our part in trying to conserve it, but where do we draw the line in international policy. As other comments said, Brazil is trying to industrialize their country and by industrializing, something has to be given but to what extend is debatable. However, what right does the U.S. have to demand certain protocols of other nations. I personally don't believe that the US is the best "outstanding" example of environmental protection. This can be said for almost, if not all, nations worldwide because we all have our own problems.
- +2
May 14 2013: I believe it goes beyond allowing Brazil to run their own country. With the CO2 levels as high as they are and with the amount of pollution in the world it becomes everyones problem when something like the Belo Monte Dam is about to be constructed. We cannot afford to lose such a valuable ecosystem. And with the methane emissions that will be produced and emitted into the atmosphere I think that this becomes everyones problem.
Ryan Garrett
May 15 2013: I think Robby has a good point. The U.S. has a bad reputation, especially in South America, for manipulating political powers and exploiting resources. We are also among the highest per capita energy consumers in the world, and therefor have little room to criticize. In my experience traveling through Latin America, I was faced with this hypocrisy, the way we Americans want to solve poorer countries problems, fix their corrupt governments, and educate their children, but we are less likely to look at our own habitat destruction, bad education, corruption. Maybe it is easier for people to deal with problems that are vague and far off.
- +1
That said, the Belo Monte dam is going to have a devastating effect on an area of high biological and cultural significance, and I think it is great that there is resistance, and that people all over the world are showing concern. I just wonder how effective it is to sign online petitions, and donate money. I dare say that this conversation is a waste of time unless it leads to any real action from some of it's participants. I feel that our potential to protect and benefit an environment goes down in proportion to our distance from that environment. I know that each of us can dramatically improve a portion of the Willamette river if we chose to, be it through eradicating invasives, or fighting riverfront construction. For some reason it is easier for us to focus on problems in Brazil.
May 15 2013: As much as the USA wants to fix everyone else's problems when we should really focus on fixing our own problems. In that same sense, Brazil is going to be the only country that has the final say in situation such as this one. Unless, does the involved have to be global uproar? UN involvement? At what point can a government be persuaded to change on their own?May 15 2013: I definitely agree that this goes, or at least it should go, beyond Brazil governing themselves. Times are changing, and I think its time to start viewing all people as one instead of being separated amongst nations. These are big issues at hand, and regardless of what people think, it will effect everyone. This is everyone problem. People can't continue to sit on their asses and watch while people ignorantly destroy precious ecosystems.
Walter Holt
May 15 2013: I agree that individually countries have no say in how other countries operate. I think the bigger question to ask is if the construction of dams and power plants is a governmental thing or a global population thing. I think that if a government wants to do something that would have a large effect as the Belo Monte dam would, then the country should have to go through a larger group that has more in mind than money. The United Nations exists for a reason. It deals more with humanitarian issues, but has no real power behind it besides enforcing trade sanctions. Could the United Nations be the only way to scuttle this project or is there a better way?
- +1
May 15 2013: I think that is a good idea. Individual countries cannot dictate what another country decides to do. But, there should be a global law or procedure for things such as this that have to get approved by a higher group. This is something that is not only going to impact Brazil.
Justin Allen
May 14 2013: This isn't only an issue in brazil, China also plans to build a series of 13 hydro-electric dams in China's last free flowing river, the Salween a.k.a. Thanlwin. The project will supposedly displace about 40,000 people and submerge 20 miles of land. I believe these questions apply for all rivers being threatened by plans to build major hydroelectric dams.
- +2
May 14 2013: In an article from Scientific American, they discuss the damming options on the Yangtze River. "There are 338 kinds of freshwater fish in the Yangtze River and the 162 of them are endemic to the river. It seems obvious that many or all of them could be impacted by a dam in the middle of the reserve." The Xiaonanhai Dam will be built in the middle of the Upper Yangtze Native and Rare Fish Reserve.
Wow, and we thought the Amazon has it bad. Imagine what this will do to China's native fish species. It's absolutely amazing how these huge dam projects are being undertaken and rarely do we hear them publicized. How many other countries are doing the same as Brazil and China? And even if there are, is there a way to make them change their minds about destroying biodiversity for energy generation?
May 14 2013: It's amazing to me that is this going on in Brazil and yet this is the first I have heard of it! The fact that China may be headed the same direction is really scary. It's always easier to see and except quick reward for choices that are made but the consequences are not considered until it is too late. Unfortunately money talks and holds a lot of power in our world even if it hurts us in the long run.
Jon Cox
May 14 2013: It appears that nothing stands in the way of progress. Not world protest, not biodiversity, scientific scrutiny, not rainforest...
- 0
Came across this bit while reading about Itaipu dam on the border of Brazil and Paraguay. This dam was built in the 70s and 80s. It is extremely efficient and is considered one of the 7 wonders of the modern world, BUUUT......
"When construction of the dam began, approximately 10,000 families living beside the Paraná River were displaced.[11]
The world's largest waterfall by volume, the Guaíra Falls were drowned by the newly formed Itaipu reservoir. The Brazilian government liquidated the Guaíra Falls National Park, and dynamited the submerged rock face where the falls had been, facilitating safer navigation, thus eliminating the possibility of restoring the falls in the future. A few months before the reservoir was filled, 80 people died when an overcrowded bridge overlooking the falls collapsed, as tourists sought a last glimpse of the falls."
Pretty bleak. And this is nothing new indeed.
Edit: Here's an article about the destruction of Guaira falls http://www.internationalrivers.org/es/node/1611May 14 2013: In a report published in Nature Climate Change, Philip Fearnside, a leading Amazon scientist, explained that tropical dams are little more than green washing. He said that various mathematical errors had been made by electrical authorities when attempting to estimate the amount of greenhouse emissions from the dams. He described how dams constructed in tropical areas act as "methane factories," especially during the first few decades after construction. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and has an even stronger impact on global warming than carbon dioxide. He went on to point out that these first few decades of heavy methane emissions correspond exactly to the narrow window of time we have to bring global warming under control in order to avert its worst effects.
A recent study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science concluded that deforestation may significantly decrease the hydroelectric potential of tropical rainforest regions. Deforestation can inhibit rainfall in tropical regions, decreasing precipitation by anywhere from 6 to 36 %. It was stated in the paper that this could potentially decrease the electrical output of the Belo Monte dam to just a quarter of its projected capacity.
As others have pointed out, there are many energy alternatives that Brazil can pursue, including wind and solar. Fearnside mentioned key areas where consumption could be reduced. For instance, the use of inefficient electric showerheads consumes 5% of the nation's energy usage. Replacing electric showerheads with solar water heating would significantly reduce energy demands. Halting aluminum exports was also recommended. Aluminum mining is an energy-intensive process that is highly destructive to the environment, and, according to Fearnside, produces too few jobs for what it's worth.
I think that the Brazilian government should carefully reconsider the science behind the issue and contemplate what it might be forecasting about their future energy security.
May 14 2013: Chelsea I would love to see the papers you reference. Do you have links handy?
May 14 2013: Yes, I meant to include the links but I hit my character limit. Here are the articles I referenced:
And here are the papers that were cited in the articles:
May 14 2013: These links about the flawed dam analysis and reduced generating capacity due to lack of rainfall are very interesting. From other information I've read Brazil is basically looking for a very quick and 'cheap' way to produce a lot of power for increasing energy demands from a growing population and industrial sector. As a few other people have stated, the perception of this hydroelectric source as cheap is skewed because it fails to take into account (in terms of money) how valuable the ecosystem services offered by this extremely biodiverse region really are, in addition to indigenous land claims.
The perception of a massive increase in energy demand is also being misrepresented in terms of how much and to what extend energy will be needed. This is because Brazil is using a quick and dirty way to gather energy for what is in many ways an inefficient system of infrastructure and electronic products. While I do not know much about specific standards Brazil has in place related to energy efficiency, I do know that there is always more that can be done. The government should be looking for ways to make the current energy consumption as efficient as possible because increases in efficiency can provide the growing economic/manufacturing sectors with some leftover energy that is not being used (and otherwise would have been used). In terms of biodiversity, increases in efficiency can reduce some impacts of growing energy demand and many sources of efficiency would have a much less dramatic impact on biodiversity.
In the end I think it boils down to this: the government of Brazil should be looking to other sources of energy like wind/solar and increases in nationwide efficiency related to all sectors instead of spending $14.4 billion on one large project. Rather, the money should be invested in a myriad of different energy solutions, including research on new technologies, best practices, environmental impact, and efficiency.May 14 2013: An interesting question was posed in class today: Does Brazil have the "right" to build dams on the Amazon? This question is incredibly complicated to answer, because in my opinion there is no correct answer. Does a nation have a right to develop the infrastructure it feels it needs to provide electricity to its citizens? Most people would probably say yes. At the same time, it seems undeniably tragic that an incredible ecosystem that is unequaled on our planet would face such destruction. I wonder what influence other nations or organizations could exert on Brazil? Geopolitics is typically subject to the idea of sovereignty, and the believe that nations can do what they will with the land and natural resources within their borders. That said, I do not know how we can ignore the construction of a dam that would flood the homeland of numerous indigenous tribes.
Brazil is a nation that has been really emerging in recent decades as a major economic and political entity on the global stage, and its development has understandably led to rising demands for the cheapest electricity possible. Many people have brought up great points about the possible alternatives (e.g. wind, solar, etc) but what motivation is there for Brazil to invest in these more expensive technologies? We need to remember that every decision made by the government of a developing nation will be guided by economic realities. If we want to protect the Amazon, we need to figure out how alternative sources of energy can be made equally economically feasible.
Mario R
May 14 2013: Well said Alex, in an ealier comment, I linked an article that described a breakthrough in solar technology made by Brazlilian scientists. This was the incorporation of photo voltaic cells into thin sheet of plastic. The research and development that went into the production of this discovery was only $10 million, a fraction of the cost of the Belo Monte Dam Complex. While that's still a lot of money, the Dam project is projected around $17 billion. I think that if this $17 billion was diverted to the research and production of more projects like this one, the potential for cheaper alternatives would be very helpful in accounting for the energy demands of Brazil.
- +1
Your point regarding the entitlement to land is an excellent one. While biodiversity, and groups of people, will almost always be affected in most kinds of cleaner alternatives, I think that other alternatives will pose less of an adverse affect to wildlife than the Belo Monte.
Here's the article: http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/03/brazilian-made-plastic-solar-panels-a-clean-energy-breakthroughMay 14 2013: I completely agree! This is a complicated issue but the bottom line is the country's economic needs. We can find an alternative manner to supply energy and some form of capital gain, the amazon ecosystem at risk could be saved. There needs to be an alternative to their energy needs that will meet these needs. The use of microalgae for energy might be an interesting alternative. Jonathan Trent gave a Ted talk (http://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_trent_energy_from_floating_algae_pods.html) that suggests using microalgae in waster water to create biofuels and sequester carbon dioxide. He calls his invention OMEGA, Offshore Membrane Enclosures for Growing Algae. They us solar energy to grow, and the wave energy on the surface provides energy for mixing the algae, and the temperature is controlled by the surrounding water temperature. The algae that grow produce oxygen, biofuels, fertilizer, food other bi-algal products of interest. I wonder if this could be applied as a remedy to this situation.May 14 2013: I agree that there is no good answer to the question you posed. Natural resources at the scale of the amazon, and the ecosystem services they provide, have benefits far beyond national borders. Yet, coming from a nation that has exploited resources at home and abroad to the detriment of the global environment, I find it difficult to see the US imposing more stringent environmental standards on Brazil.
There are a few policy tools that could change the equation as it stands right now. One is to do as Mario suggests, and make the cost of alternate energy sources cheaper. That could happen through investment in technologies or through subsidies for "clean" energy (I think we've learned by now that there is no such thing as truly clean energy) either from Brazil or external financing institutions. Another option would be to internalize the externality, or put a price on the ecosystem services being lost. It seems unlikely that Brazil would impose this on itself, but the US could role model by beginning to internalize the cost of carbon in our economy.
Wouldn't it be incredible if international financial institutions like the World Bank used their financial power to encourage sustainable development? We have set ourselves up for a huge expansion of practices that degrade the environment. Developing countries very understandably want the quality of life experienced in first world countries, and the tools we've given them to accomplish this through Structural Adjustment Programs rely on a free market economy. So, with severely limited social safety nets and measures meant to encourage business, how can we expect anything else but exploitation of the environment and indigenous people? Of course in the name of development and bettering quality of life for everyone in the country. As is being discussed here though, the Amazon itself will be much more valuable in the long run than a dam that causes the release of large amounts of methane.
Eun Min
May 14 2013: I agree. The economy decides what they can do. However, they need to consider other problems what they would face after that such as loss of ecosystem services and functions.They might pay more on those than building a dam?
- 0
Ben Story
May 14 2013: Although it would be great if the construction of the dam could be stopped, it doesn't seem very likely. The dam's construction was momentarily halted in December of last year ue to the influence of a federal judge but it has since started up again.
- +2
I think the aim now should be to investigate ways to save some of the species and mitigate the damage done. It might be a good idea to start collecting species in the local habitat and transporting them to safer environments (maybe zoo's but hopefully other natural locations). Also, it would interesting to see if the dam's construction includes any fish passage ways that will enable fish to travel upstream to their natural breeding grounds. Fish ladders would be a good start but have they looked into any more advanced technologies?
Oregon has been a leader in these kind of technologies and it would be hoped that can be applied in this situation.
Also, would it be possible to dig moats, dikes, or trenches around certain parts of the forest in order to maintain small pockets of dry land (e.g. nature preserves)?
Mario R
May 14 2013: I agree with you Ben. I think that unfortunately, Brazil will indeed go through with the construction of the Belo Monte Dam. While I think that trying to conserve current endemic species is absolutely critical while the occupy movement is currently in swing, there also needs to be some thought put into how to reduce the carbon monoxide emissions that will inevitably result from the decomposing vegetation. Not to mention the deforestation that will result which compounds the effects of the carbon emissions. And how to best accommodate all of the indigenous tribes that will invariably be affected.May 15 2013: I was also curious about the idea of fish ladders, and it seems that they are planning on constructing some kind of fish ladder system or other forms of passage for the local fish communities, but from the reading I've done it sounds like they won't make much of a difference. Fish ladders are very effective for really large dams because the fish simply can't make it that far up, but for smaller dams they can be more helpful. So I imagine that, if they end up using ladders, they won't really help to maintain the local fish populations due to the expected size of the Belo Monte Dam.
- 0
Huan Chen
May 15 2013: Those indigenous people absolutely have the right to protect their ancestral homeland. No one want to see the place where he live to be harmed. Constructing dams would definitely exerted bad influence on biodiversity and habitats in Amazon Rainforest. However; the huge benefits behind it drive the government to make that decision. So, in my opinion, it may be hard to stop dam construction. The best way to solve this problem maybe that government and indigenous resident representatives can communicate and come up with feasible ways. Actually I have no idea about the solution to this issue.May 14 2013: The part that I don't like is that the dam is going to be used to power huge industrial/manufacturing plants. I think if they are going to spend that much money on building a dam they might as well spend their money on a renewable resource that will have less impact on the environment and have a greater turn around for future energy needs. They can use solar power, wind turbines, or even tidal power. Why spend millions of dollars on something that is going to destroy our natural environment when there are other options for energy.May 14 2013: Continuing:
- +1
Two comments that didn´t fit in the previous post:
Belo Monte was estimated to custo approx 8 billion dollars and it is now at 14 billion dollars. It is a money machine and prices charged higher than market prices are just going down corruption drains.
Laslty, concerning the cost of renewable energies: I recently read somewhere that the only reason why oil based energy sources are so competitive is because they are heavily subsidized. If reweable sources received the smae kind of incentives, they would probably be very competitive as well.
May 14 2013: So wonderful Juliana to hear your voice in our UO Biodiversity class. Thanks for the input.May 14 2013: The biggest problem with tropical dams is of course the release of the greenhouse gas methane, which holds in atmospheric heat 21 times better than carbon dioxide. Methane is a product of the anaerobic decay of plant matter that sinks to the bottom of the reservoir after flooding. This occurs because all the oxygen is used up at higher water levels. The release of methane doesn't decrease as time goes on because plant life returns and sinks to the bottom again because the flow of water is so slow. You can flood a smaller area to get the reservoir you need if you can manipulate mountaneous terrain, but on flat land you need quite a large area. The methane is released all along the waterway, making methane capturing devices cumbersome. However, people need energy one way or another to put it simply, and my first impression is to be ok with the project. It is very unfortunate that the tribes' lands will be flooded, but many people will benefit. Nevertheless I believe the displaced people should be compensated somehow. And dams despite their flaws do take the place of fossil fuels which are slightly worse.
Shiyu Tang
May 14 2013: Indigenous people in the Amazon definitely have the right to decide their ancestral homeland's future and boycott the construction of Belo Monte project and future upstream dams. Since Brazilian government's logic of how Belo Monte dam is necessary for providing electricity for all Brazilians, is actually based on several myths. First of all, Belo Monte will not provide "clean and renewable" energy as the project predicted, Belo Monte's 668Km2 reservoir will flood 400Km2 of forest and big dams in tropic area will cause enormous emission of methane gas. Methane is 25 times more potent than CO2. Secondly, Belo Monte will become the most energy inefficient dams in Brazil, since during dry season it can only produce 10% of its 11233MW predicted capacity. What is more, not all the energy will power Brazilian families. Only 70% will be sold to the public, the rest 30% energy will be resold to energy-intensive industry, such as mining. The establishment of the dams actually increases mining expansion in the Amazon region, and will lead to vicious cycle in energy consumption. Mining also lead to other threats in biodiversity.
- +1
However, the definitive installation license of the dam was granted in June 2011 and the construction seems to move onto accelerating phase. We should aim to think up of backup plan to decrease the threat of the mega-dam to biodiversity, if the program cannot be stopped. For instance, Stop future construction of upstream dams; Establish laws to strictly regulate hydroelectricity energy use in order to avoid waste or further pollution, such as mining threats; Establish conservation program for threatened species, such as captive breeding, zoos. Compute the overall risks of other energy alternatives and find out the cleanest one.
The "Amazon Watch" is a major website for supporting indigenous people and protecting Amazon region, you can find much more valuable information there and take action to tell the government that the Amazon is not for sale.
May 14 2013: How and why-- the enormous emissions of methane gas, please and thank you?
May 14 2013: Decomposition of plant materials under anaerobic (without oxygen) conditions produces methane. The 400 square kilometers of forest flooded by the dam will create a prime environment for this type of decomposition.
May 14 2013: Thank you Eleni.May 14 2013: Yes.Just as Eleni explained, the basic principle of how enormous methane gas formed is by decomposition of flooded plants. Methane is produced at the reservoir bottom.When it rises toward the surface,it will be oxidized in the water to carbon dioxide. That is why hydropower cannot be considered as clean energy in tropical area. You can check out more information about methane emission from tropical dams in the following links:
May 14 2013: Thanks ShiyuMay 14 2013: I understand the Brazilian government's need to provide electricity for its citizens, but building the Belo Monte Dam definitely does not seem like the right way to achieve this. While the dam is expected to alleviate the electricity crisis in Brazil, it also comes with many negative consequences that probably can't be reversed. The amazon rainforest is home to ecosystems with some of the highest biodiversity in the world, and I constantly hear the phrase "save the rainforest," so I'm confused why the Brazilian government would be willing to destroy such important habitats.
If the dam is constructed, it will certain cause decreases in the number of aquatic species as well as land species. The indigenous people who inhabit this area of the forest will be greatly affected by these changes, since they rely on these resources to survive. This will force these indigenous people to be displaced from their homes and moved to new habitats. Moreover, the entry of many immigrants to this area during the construction of the dam can bring diseases to the indigenous people, putting their lives at risk because they have little resistance to outside diseases. I think that the indigenous people absolutely should have a say in what happens to their homeland. However, I'm not sure about Brazil, but I know in many other Latin American countries, the indigenous people are treated with a lot of discrimination and have little to no influence in the governmental issues of their countries.
May 15 2013: It really saddens me to begin to consider the biological diversity that will be lost through this project. I think the consequences of the dam are only a portion of what will ensue. Going one step further concerning the introduction of immigrants, bringing diseases is just the beginning. As people relocate to the area, roads will pave the way for complete exploitation and disturbance of the once secluded Amazon area. From clearing areas for timber/agriculture, hunting (introduction of guns for hunting), and pollutants, the complex ecosystem will be inevitably be dismantled.May 14 2013: Dams will most certainly be an amazing source of energy for Brazil; the small amount of intermittency provided by rivers ensures optimal peak energy service. This is very helpful for Brazil's growing economy. Is it the best intention for Brazil to do this? From an economic stand point, yes. From a social standpoint, no. The externalities and other social damages are unaccounted for, leaving the diverse habitats fragmented and potentially uninhabitable by terrestrial species.
It does beg the question: Are we allowed to potentially slow the growth of Brazil? From Brazil's standpoint they are a growing economy, aspiring to become a 1st world country. Because of this, the demands for power must be met. This may include using the cheapest electricity source like any economy does. Many states in the U.S. rely on coal-fire plants to meet their energy needs. Yet, do we have other countries coming into our economic affairs?
But it also begs on another question: is it ethical to destroy a diverse habitat in the Amazon? I personally think it isn't. Growth must controlled and not just managed. The rate of Brazil's growth is putting immense strain on the neighboring habitats and by reducing biodiversity and promoting fragmented, less diverse habitats. This can put many species at risk for extinction.
At what point do we owe it to preserve nature? In the recent course of events, it appears it will happen when we need it most.
May 14 2013: You make a great point about questioning the rate of growth and the point that our modern society needs to put nature above the booming expansion of infrastructure. The earth is something shared between all people and all organisms, the Dali Lama spoke about that while he was here at the U of O. At what point do we need to stop massacring natural diversity epicenters and treat them as keystone ecosystems?
A quick bit of info about Brazil's dams. The Belo Monte Dam project was build to use what is called "run-of-river" damming. This utilizes a relatively smaller reservoir than the traditional types of dams. This might sound good, but when the reservoir is still the size of Chicago, I think it's still more harm than good. Anyway, using this smaller reservoir dam relies heavily on the amount of rain fall each year. This last year Brazil's reservoirs finished at just 30.5% of capacity. This means that these dams aren't actually running at full capacity! The Belo Monte project will produce only 10% of its 11,233 MW installed energy generating capacity during the 3-5 month-long dry season, an average of only 4,462 MW throughout the year, or 39% of its nominal capacity.
Morgan Henry
May 14 2013: I agree that allowing for economic autonomy is of utmost importance in maintaining international relationships. But that said, I find it hard to believe the energy produced by a hydroelectric dam system on the Amazon could out weight the value of its ecosystem services. Provided links above are all clearly one sided, against dam construction; but even still, if we considered best case scenarios, I don't know if the numbers could match up.
- +1
And again inline with the Dali Lama's view of earth shared by all humanity and the fact we now live in a global community, should the rest of the world be trying to step in (contrary to my previous statement), giving Brazil some economic incentive not to construct the Belo Monte Dam?
May 14 2013: I too find it very difficult to understand how this dam provides more benefits than ecosystem services. I personally feel that many countries should work together rather than compete with one another. We are a globalized society, yet our perception is blinding reality.
I know many countries could work together to subsidize Brazil, and other developing nations, with clean energy through the use of offsets, however, fraudulent offsets are a real problem in the world of carbon sequestration.May 15 2013: I think its very interesting that you bring up social vs economic sides to the belomonte dam. Economically the dam will bring in a lot of money and yes I agree help with the growing economy. But at what cost? To play devils advocate, who are we do to tell Brazil what they can and can't do in their own country? Did anyone come into our country telling us to stop the environmental atrocities that have been committed here? That being said, if someone had come in and stopped us im sure many of our environmental issues could have been avoided.
I think the most crucial aspect of this debate is how to get the Brazilian government to understand the horrible consequences of the dam construction. It seems like our ethical duty to try our hardest to persuade the government to halt construction. At the very least we should try to implement innovative ideas into the dam that could help curb the ecological side effects. How can this be said to the government? How can it be explained to the government the severe costs of going through with dam construction when so many other countries have done similar atrocities and continue to do them everyday?
May 15 2013: I was also thinking about the social aspect of this issue and the fact that the U.S. uses about 25% of the world's fossil fuel resources when we only have 5% of the world population, so who are we to dictate environmental degradation opinions when we have so much work to do in our own efforts. I'm not sure if trying to convince the government will necessarily work because the goal of the project is money, and in a capitalist market that rules everything. I think it's important to look at other countries when it comes to massive projects of habitat destruction, but if we want to be taken seriously we need to address the issues in our own country and with our own government as well.May 14 2013: One of the more surprising things on this topic for me was that when we discussed this topic in class it was the first that I had heard about it. We grew up in the generation of "save the rain forest" and yet this issue had someone evaded my knowledge until now. I may not follow all environmental problems of the world religiously but I like to think I am relatively well informed about most environmental issues. For the impact these dams would have on the ecosystem I don't understand why it has not received attention of the environmental community for it to be common knowledge. There are great videos, articles, and blogs about this topic that are definitely helping to spread the word through social media. I wonder if it would help if some of the organizations that fight against deforestation in the Amazon would get on board with the native people to get this message out there. The potential loss of species and displacement of people is staggering and I feel that if more people knew there would be a bigger protest globally. Thank you Katrina for bringing this topic to out attention!May 14 2013: Part (1/2)
What a great, current, and relevant topic Katrina! I think that spreading awareness and starting discussions about projects such as the Belo Monte Dam are much needed, and will have such expansive consequences, that it is something people all over the world need to be aware of.
The interplay between the conservation/destruction of biodiversity, its interactions with indigenous people, as well as the motivating political and economic factors is something that I think about a lot and read about on a daily basis. As we have learned, ecosystems are complex webs of interacting elements, and changing one aspect can have a huge affect. This project itself will not only directly affect the biodiversity of the area but will also lead to a myriad of indirect affects that together, in my opinion will be devastating to the world.
The leading cause of the biodiversity loss today and in the future is climate change. Climate change encompasses and is fueled by the many ecological changes that are occurring on our planet today as a result of human activity. Magdoff and Foster in their book What Every Environmentalist Needs To Know about Capitalism explain that climate change acts as a set of tipping points that, when reached, are extremely difficult to recover from and can lead to permanent damage or change of an ecosystem. Unfortunately the world is already very close to many of those tipping points that have been estimated by scientists because we simply aren't doing much to ameliorate the situation. Initiatives to curve climate change, for example the cap and trade system for fossil fuels, are fronts put up that make people think that something is being done about the issue while emissions aren't actually decreasing; If anything, they are increasing. As less developed countries continue to develop following the "American" model, increasing their consumption, their use of fossil fuels, and exploiting their resources beyond recovery we will surely reach those tipping
Cori Brant
May 14 2013: Before this TEDconversation i had no idea that this was going on in Brazil, which is shocking since this is a huge issue. From the research i have done on my own about it i haven't found a benefit to putting the Belo Monte Dam into the Amazon. With the evidence that has been provided to the government about the hundreds of negative affects this dam will cause not only the ecosystem but the local human population its hard to believe that the government is doing this for any other reason then big money. The power from these hydro plants will go to support the mining operations which will only cause more destruction to the Amazon. At the end of the youtube video they discussed all the affective ways the government could decrease there energy use, increase there renewable energy and create tons of jobs to stimulate the economy. This dam is a serious problem that needs to be focused on. Losing endemic species and land that helps local indigenous tribes will have devastating affects, that will have irreversible consequences.
- +1
May 14 2013: In one documentary they talk about the business investments that are driving the construction of the dam. This includes Brazil signing large contracts with foreign business suppliers for materials to build the Belo Monte project. The video also suggests that the pressure from international interests are a driving factor of why Brazil chose to build the dam instead of investing in other energy options. This documentary has a lot of interviews with the indigenous people including Chief Raoni Metuktire and his successor Megaron Txucarramãe. It's a full length movie, but very interesting.
Here's a link for it on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoRhavupkfwMay 14 2013: I feel the same way, I never knew this was going on or heard anything about the Belo Monte Dam project until this discussion. It is scary how much control the government can have. It seriously blows my mind that this type of thing can even be considered when so many thousands of people will be removed from their homes, and homeland flooded or dried up, as well as all the impacts it is going to have on the environment. Money really is the source of all evil :(
Dan Straub
May 14 2013: Brazils need for power is predicted to go up by 6000MW a year for the next ten years. With the energy sources it has in place it will not be able to meet this need. So it is going to have to do something to get this energy. Brazil has many choices, offshore oil and gas, hydropower, soar and wind, sugarcane bagasses as well as shale gas. All of which have pros and cons. Because of Brazils vast diversity it has many choices in which way it would like to go to harness energy. It is interesting that they seem to have chosen hydropower. With any choice they make biodiversity will be lost but are they making the best choice? Seems they are going forward with this regardless. Not scientific but really good a recent article from The Economist below which goes into depth about the impact on the native people in which Brazil plans to pay people for migration and compensation. However is that right?
- +1
Phoebe Cone
May 14 2013: Interesting article, and good point that no matter which energy source Brazil chooses to pursue, biodiversity will inevitably be affected. The effects upon biodiversity that the Belo Monte Dam (and all its related structures) will cause sounds like it could be quite massive - the video we watched said 10 species just in the Big Bend alone! However, since I don't think Brazil will consider simply not providing power to all of its people as an option, they will have to find some other major energy source. The article was saying how Brazil has one of the greatest capacities of any country in the world to harness wind and solar energy. I don't know if Brazil could satisfy its power needs completely with wind and solar power (probably not), but a major pro of this option is that it wouldn't force indigenous people from their homes or destroy their livelihoods. Yes, wind and solar would also have negative effects on biodiversity, but at least these peoples' lives would not be disrupted. Another idea I had came from an article I read in the local newspaper yesterday, which described how popular American cars produced for the growing Brazilian auto market are less safe and are much less efficient than the same cars produced for US and European markets. Perhaps if Brazil tightened its regulations on fuel efficiency of vehicles, this could help bring down its fuel and power needs as well?
- +1
May 14 2013: I completely agree about using wind and solar as a better alternative. And agree it probably isn't enough to power all of their needs. A compromise would be nice to see maybe using wind, solar and hydropower all together. Using a different dam not nearly as massive and where it would not cause as much damage as the purposed dam would at the big bend. That to me might be ideal.May 14 2013: Wind and solar are great, biologically-sound alternatives to hydroelectric dams, but they would likely not provide enough energy to power the local, intensive mining industry in the Para state of Brazil. Another con of these two harmless energy sources is the idea that they require more care and labor than hydropower, so the area could potentially be disturbed by urbanization, which causes immense losses to biological diversity.
I think Dan's idea of having more, smaller dams could potentially cause as much damage as one larger dam. We need to discover more sources of energy that can provide the necessary energy needed for the region without causes permanent damage to local plant, animal, and indigenous communities.


text:
The cinema and movies has always been a source of enjoyment and employment. After leaving college, my first job was with Kerridge Odeon, a film distributor in Auckland, New Zealand. This provided the ideal start for my working life and, unknown to me at the time, the ideal introduction into my own movie distribution company much later.
Like most young fellows of my vintage, the yearning for change and "something better" saw me take up different opportunities as they presented. The next few years after leaving Kerridge Odeon saw me working as a sales cadet for a major engineering supply company, before becoming Sales Manager for a smaller company, also in the Engineering field.
Life was good and getting even better.
After becoming a husband to my life partner, Sherrie, a bonny New Zealand lass, and later a father, my career path changed yet again and I became a self-employed Insurance Agent for AMP, selling Life, Super, Fire and General insurance.
In 1978, as a family, we left New Zealand to live in Queensland, Australia.
Yes, this move prompted another career change, still in the sales area - I became Sales Manager for a home builder, selling family homes and assisting with finance. This led to an interest in and passion for property development and a few years later, along with Sherrie, we started our own property development company. I am a member of the Australian Institute of Construction (MAIC).
Our development business prospered yet we were always seeking new opportunities and the booming home entertainment industry and movie rental explosion provided the inspiration. In 1991, Eagle Entertainment (Aust) Pty Ltd, a film distribution company, a family business, was born.
Today, one of my sons is running Eagle Entertainment and my time is spent between the property business and the film business.
My life is blessed; whilst we lost my beloved wife and mum of our kids last year after a long illness, I enjoy the love and support of 4 children and 6 grandchildren. And with all the travelling Sherrie and l did over the years, mainly in the Film Industry, I cherish a wonderful circle of friends in many countries.
Stefano Dammicco was the founder and CEO of Eagle Pictures S.p.A. until 2007. Under his leadership, Eagle Pictures produced an impressive series of box-office hits including Save the Last Dance, Along Came a Spider, Chocolat, Tomb Raider, CSI (TV series), The Passion of Christ, Memoirs of a Geisha, The Interpreter, Apocalypto and Eastern Promises to name a few. Stefano has worked with major the US studios and independent distributors and producers all over the world.
In 2013 Stefano founded Adler Entertainment. Since Adler's birth, its goal has been to target potential box office hits. Today Adler's slate is widely considered one of the strongest ever built, with films such as Maps to The Stars, directed by David Cronenberg (in Competition at the 2014 Cannes Film Festival ), Mortdecai starring Johnny Depp and Gwyneth Paltrow, Ridley Scott's Child 44 starring Tom Hardy and Gary Oldman, Gotti starring John Travolta and Anthony Hopkins, Tracers starring Taylor Lautner, Solace starring Anthony Hopkins and Colin Farrell, The Last Witch Hunter starring Vin Diesel, American Ultra starring Kristen Stewart, Knight of Cups directed by Terrence Malick and starring Christian Bale, Natalie Portman and Cate Blanchett, Regression directed by Alejandro Amenábar and starring Ethan Hawke and Emma Watson, The Rewrite starring Hugh Grant and Marisa Tomei, Expiration starring Bruce Willis and Gods of Egypt directed by Alex Proyas and starring Gerard Butler.
Stefano has got four sons and lives in Milan with his wife Verena and Thomas, the littlest son.
When I was about 7 or 8 years old, happily growing up as an only child in a loving, television-free family home on the outskirts of Cologne, Germany, one day a cute big eyed, snub-nosed something crossed my path – it was a deer called Bambi…
I'll never forget that first visit to the local cinema – a true movie palace with a hugely impressive mezzanine and '70s state-of-the-art projection and sound. As the auditorium was filling up, the usher kept sending people towards my seat – not realizing it had already been taken by the tiny little kid I was back then. Seventy minutes and quite a few tears later I had lost touch with reality, falling prey to the magnetic attraction of movie magic.
Ever since that day, I spent hours after hours at the movies, after school and on the weekends, fighting a personal campaign against German rating laws – while "officially" enjoying marathon bike tours through the countryside. More than once did I risk getting busted when returning home late for dinner – due to unexpected extended running times.
Today, after more than two decades in the movie and TV business and thousands of movies (and, yes, TV shows) later, there are still only very few things that can lure me away from the screen, whether big or small: a spicy Chicken Tikka Masala, a brilliant bluegrass album, a date with Rachael Leigh Cook – or my two wonderful sons, themselves on the verge of becoming true movie buffs.
I wonder why… ;-)
To receive AFM news along with updates from The Film Catalogue, please enter your contact information below.
* - Required Field
Thank you! We received your submission!
Get AFM Alerts »
Watch the AFM video...
Preview the event that has
launched over 10,000 films!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Put your passion for gaming to work
Everywhere you look today people of all ages are playing games – on their computers, cell phones and online. Last year alone, more than 8.5 million people subscribed to online role-playing games.
In fact, it is predicted that the game industry will out-produce all other entertainment media including movies and music. Global industry sales for console games are predicted to grow to $34.7 billion by 2012. In the United States, sales of all types of video and computer games will increase to $11.7 billion.
*Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Entertainment & Media Outlook Report
Am I a good fit for this career?
If you have a flair for graphics and a love of computer games – this could be the perfect career field for you.
Game developers need to be creative, detail-oriented and hard workers. They devote long hours to finishing complex projects to meet tight deadlines. A career in gaming and graphic arts would be right for you if you:
- Love computer games
- Have strong visual spatial abilities
- Have a good sense of what makes one computer game better than others
- Good communication skills
- Enjoy all aspects of a game, such as sound, motion, illustration, and story
- Work equally well alone or in a team
- Value logic-based reasoning
- Have an aptitude for computers and software
View Herzing University Accreditation and Approvals
Bachelor of Science in Game Development Gainful Employment
What are the career opportunities in this field?
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, individuals with a bachelor's degree and knowledge of computer design software, particularly those with web site design and animation experience will have the best opportunities in this very competitive marketplace.
Those with web site design and animation experience will especially be needed as demand increases for design projects for interactive media – web sites, video games, cellular telephones, personal digital assistants, and other technology.
Game Designer Career Paths
Game Designers can decide from a wide range of career paths, choosing those that best meet their interests as well as strengths. Graduates find work as multimedia artists and animators, graphic and web designers and web-based game developers. Others may prefer the management or administrative role and find careers as creative directors, game developers or team leaders. A small number of designers also worked in engineering services or for management, scientific, and technical consulting firms.
Position titles for Game Designers include:
- Game Developer
- Illustrator
- Web Designer
- Multimedia Author
- Concept Artist
- Level Designer
- Visual Effects Artist
Game Designer Career Fields
Nearly every industry hires designers and developers to create and manage digital media for web sites, advertising, games, movies and television special effects. These include:
- Advertising
- Corporate Communications
- Education
- E-learning Providers
- Entertainment
- Government
- Hospitality
- Retail and E-tail
- Manufacturing
- Marketing Firms
- Medical
- Online Service
- Training and Development
- Web site Development
Work Environment
Game development is usually performed in an extremely casual business environment with T-shirts and sandals being common work attire. Many find this type of environment to be rewarding and pleasant, both professionally and personally. However, the industry is also known to require employees to work long hours.
What is the program title, length, and content?
The bachelor's in game development teaches students the design and coding skills needed to effectively create games at a professional level.
Game Development Program Info Chart
Program availability varies by location.
|Bachelor of Science in Game Development
Bachelor of Science in Game Development
The Bachelor of Science Degree in Game Development employs an integrated and coherent approach that prepares students with the necessary academic knowledge and technical competencies required for a wide range of positions in the gaming and graphic arts industry. This program trains students in the most current industry software to create 2D and 3D animations that emphasize both black/white and color, shading, sound, motion, and physics. As part of the program, students will be expected to develop basic, single-player PC games, and later develop complex, multi-player games on multiple platforms. The final project for this program is determined by each individual student, and may include developing his or her own basic video game or enhancing the engine and coding of a public domain video game. Download Program Course Sheet
Which locations offer this program?
Madison Campus


text:
Follow @juicyads
Its been a banner year for the annual YNOT Grand Prix championship kart-racing series, with fans and drivers mobbing ea [read more]
Results and Winners from Montreal 2 [read more]
JuicyAds is proud to do it once again at QWEBEC Expo 2014 Friday Night Party.
"A Night At the Roxbury" is our 90's [read more]
JuicyAds.v5 © Copyright 2006-2015. All Rights Reserved.
In Partnership with Annevar Media, LLC and Juicy WebTech.
Page loaded in 0.00 seconds | 188.8.131.52


text:
While most content management users only need access to content itself, some need access to information about the content. These may be administrators who need to optimize and maintain the system or business users looking to understand the status of critical content to their operations.
Enterprise Reports for Alfresco delivers reporting capabilities that help you better understand your Alfresco content. Enterprise Reports for Alfresco helps administrators to understand the type, size, and usage of content while enabling business users to view workflow status or lifecycle states of documents.
Alfresco makes a lot of information available to your corporate business intelligence solution, but it does not provide a set of out-of-the-box reports. As a certified partner of Alfresco, Reva Solutions developed an Entereprise Reports add-on that can help Alfresco customers who do not have their own business intelligence solution to get the most out of their document management system.
Features and Functions:
· Provides 25 out-of-the-box reports in three main categories
o User Reports
o Document Reports
o Workflow Reports
· Supports three different reports formats
o PDF
o XML
o XLS
· Supports different charting styles
o Table Format
o Pie Chart
o Bar Chart
· Available in both Alfresco Explorer and Alfresco Share
· Reports are customizable to suit your specific requirements
· Reduce costs by utilizing a pre-built set of reports
· Enhance your Alfresco with a flexible and easy to use graphical user interface
· Make quicker and better decisions with readily available information


text:
Customer Reviews for Kitchen Cordless Opaque / Blackout Cellular / Honeycomb Window Shades
By TLC from Oklahoma
I love these shades. They are on a window facing the street and I've been keeping them pulled down from the top. Lots of light AND privacy. I would buy again.View this product
"Excellent Replacement"
By MaggieLue from San Antonio, TX
Replaced another brand of blackout, top-down blinds with these - the two sets of blinds were about the same price, but I can't believe the difference in quality! My new blinds are very noticeably better made, and of much, much better quality materials. Additionally, the old blinds took almost two hours, and a lot of frustration to install - my Blinds Galore set went up easily and quickly in less than 10 mints.View this product


text:
Welcome to Mobile Edge
You have no items in your shopping cart.
Currently Shopping by:
Shopping Options
2 Item(s)
View as:
You have no items to compare.
© Copyright 2015 Mobile Edge. All Rights Reserved.
Mobile Edge, LLC
1150 N. Miller Street, Anaheim, California 92806
Toll Free (866) 577-7774 | (714) 399-1400 | Fax (714) 399-1401
Features and specifications subject to change without notice.
* $50 gift card winner will be randomly selected in the first week of the month from new email subscribers submitted during the preceeding month.
* Free shipping offer applies to ground shipping in the continental U.S. only.


text:
Robert Best Sketch #1
Release Date: 8/8/2013
Product Code: CBF26
Elevate your home décor with limited edition silk screen prints featuring stunning Barbie® doll fashion illustrations. Robert Best Sketch #1 is a captivating and romantic vision in white, accented with touches of black. Hang it alone or in a group for added impact.
Each sold separately, frames not included. Print measures 12"W x14"H. Each limited edition print is numbered and includes a certificate of authenticity.


text:
Cartwright Medicine Cabinet
With clean lines and a timeless aesthetic, Cartwright makes a striking statement in any bath.
Show product details...
- Small Wall-Mount: 22"W x 7½"D x 25¼"H
- Small Inset Overall: 20½"W x 6¼"D x 26¼"H
- Small Inset Recessed Box: 14½"W x 3¾"D x 24½"H
- Large Wall-Mount: 27"W x 8"D x 31¾"H
- Large Inset Overall: 28"W x 6¼"D x 33½"H
- Large Inset Recessed Box: 20½"W x 3½"D x 29½"H
Shown in white.
Cartwright Medicine Cabinet
Painted Furniture Swatches - 6" sq.


text:
As a Corvette owner, you're likely a bit of an adrenaline junkie, with a taste for carving the occasional corner or accelerating down a long Interstate on-ramp with your foot firmly to the floorboard. And while most Corvette engines provide plenty of power for an exciting ride, the initial excitement inevitably wears off, leaving you hungry for even more power. Fortunately, extra power is available from a variety of sources, and in many cases it can simply be bolted onto the current engine. In cases like ours, however, where extreme performance is desired, the existing engine simply won't suffice, and a build from scratch is the only choice.
While the options are nearly endless when it comes to engine builds for your Corvette, we narrowed our choices down to three: a traditional Chevrolet small-block, a Chevy big-block, or a late-model-LS conversion. Although the technological advances incorporated in the LS engine made it a tempting choice, and the guttural rumble of a big-block between the fenders does exude performance, we found an interesting compromise in a challenge posed by Editor Heath: Build a first-generation small-block to similar standards as the 7.0L LS7, and see if you can make more power.
Since more power was the goal of this build, and because we've never backed down from a challenge, we decided that this approach not only fit the theme of our project car, but would make for an interesting comparison as well. And while it would be technically impossible to build a first-generation SBC to the exact standards of the 505hp LS7, we could certainly come close by using an aftermarket aluminum block and cylinder heads, and bumping displacement to an identical 427 ci. This engine swap would also be a comparatively simple affair, since Project C3 Triple-Ex is already equipped with a traditional small-block, and wouldn't require the wiring harness, ECU, and header changes an LS installation would necessitate. Even better, the large displacement SBC should give us a throaty rumble similar to that of a big-block Chevy-and we can even place a pair of 427 emblems on the hood.
With our goal in mind, we began looking for suitable parts to accomplish this engine build. Let's face it: With 505 horses and 470 lb-ft of torque, the LS7 is no slouch, so we'll need to do our homework to equal or surpass those numbers on pump gas. The LS7 comes from GM with an aluminum block, CNC-ported aluminum heads, a roller camshaft with nearly 0.600-inch lift, an arguably more efficient firing order, and 11:1 compression, so we felt all of these features were fair game when building our own small-block. And while we won't be using titanium valves like the LS7 engine, we will be using high-quality stainless-steel pieces, albeit in a smaller diameter.
Hoping to duplicate the LS7 not only in terms of displacement but also in weight, we went to Dart Machinery for one of the company's aluminum SBC race blocks, a pair of PRO1 CNC-ported aluminum cylinder heads, and a matching single-plane aluminum intake manifold. Since the Dart block is available with a raised camshaft and wider, Oldsmobile Rocket-style oil-pan rails, it will easily accommodate displacements much larger than our planned 427 cubes. While the block is available in multiple deck heights, we ordered ours with a 9.025-inch deck and cylinders rough-bored to the same 4.125-inch diameter as the LS7. We also specified 50mm cam journals to facilitate the use of roller cam bearings. We like the 50mm bearings not because the roller configuration reduces friction (the difference is likely negligible), but because the larger-diameter 50mm core can help control cam flex and maintain truer valvetrain geometry at high rpm. Another nice feature of the Dart block is the wider pan rail, which makes it easier to install stroker crankshafts without the need to hand-clearance the block.
Dart's PRO1 CNC-ported aluminum cylinder heads incorporate 2.08-inch intake and 1.60-inch exhaust valves, along with 227cc intake runners. These heads offer enough flow to make great top-end power without sacrificing too much low-end torque, so they should be a good match for our 427ci engine. A Comp Cams solid roller camshaft with just over 0.600 lift will also be utilized; it will be ground to the LS firing order to more closely compare the two engines (and because we feel there's a slight advantage to the newer approach).
Now before you cry foul over the solid roller cam (the LS utilizes a hydraulic roller), remember that our small-block is giving up significant intake-valve size to the LS engine, and needs to compensate for that deficit somehow. Additionally, there's a common misconception among enthusiasts that a solid-lifter cam needs constant adjustment, is excessively noisy, and isn't especially streetable, all of which are untrue. By choosing the proper lobe design, a solid roller cam has indefinite life, requiring only occasional valve-lash inspections just like a hydraulic roller. And while valvespring wear may be slightly accelerated over a hydraulic roller, we feel the improved horsepower, torque, and throttle response will be well worth it.


text:
To find a doctor, call 800-667-5356 or click below:
Find a Doctor
Request an Appointment
En Español (Spanish Version)
Biologic Therapies
Bone Marrow Transplant
| Chemotherapy
Hormonal Therapy
Managing Side Effects
is the use of drugs to kill cancer cells. Unlike
and surgery, which are localized treatments, chemotherapy is a systemic treatment, meaning the drugs travel throughout the whole body. This means chemotherapy can reach cancer cells that may have spread, or metastasized, to other areas.
How does chemotherapy work?
What is chemotherapy used for?
What are the types of chemotherapy?
What adverse effects can occur with chemotherapy?
Which cancers is chemotherapy used to treat?
Understanding how normal, healthy cells grow and divide is essential to understanding how chemotherapy works. All living things are composed of cells. Cells grow, divide, and die in a regulated fashion. The cell cycle is the process that normal and abnormal cells go through to grow and reproduce.
Normal, healthy cells go through the cell cycle in a regulated manner—as some cells are dividing and creating new cells, other cells are dying. Abnormal cells divide and reproduce uncontrollably, creating a mass of cells known as a tumor.
The cell cycle is important to chemotherapy because chemotherapeutic drugs target and disrupt different phases of the cell cycle. Most chemotherapy drugs act on reproducing cells—cells not in the G0 phase. Because cancer cells actively reproduce, they are primarily targeted by chemotherapeutic drugs. However, healthy cells reproduce as well, so they too are affected by chemotherapy. This is what causes side effects. When chemotherapy is given, the doctor must find a balance between destroying the cancer cells and sparing the normal cells.
Chemotherapy is used to treat many different types of cancer. The type, location, and stage of the cancer as well as your general health will largely determine if chemotherapy is appropriate and which agents ought to be used. For example, adjuvant chemotherapy is considered standard treatment for breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been used effectively in breast,
, and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancers.
Brain tumors are more difficult to treat with chemotherapy because of the shielding effect of blood-brain barrier (BBB), the tumor's location inside the skull, and the lack of adequate lymphatic drainage.
Chemotherapeutic drugs are classified by their pharmacologic action and their interference with cellular reproduction. They are divided into cell cycle phase-specific and cell cycle phase-nonspecific.
Chemotherapy can be administered via several routes. The most common method is intravenously. Usually, a thin needle is inserted into a vein on the hand or lower arm at the onset of the treatment session and is removed at the conclusion.
Chemotherapy can also be delivered by IV through catheters, ports, and pumps. A catheter is a soft, thin, flexible tube that is placed in a large vein in the body. It remains in place as long as necessary. Sometimes the catheter is attached to a port, which is a small round plastic or metal disc placed under the skin. The port stays in place as long as necessary. A pump can be used to control how fast the drugs go into the catheter or port. An external pump remains outside the body; an internal pump is surgically placed just under the skin.
A central venous catheter is placed in a large vein, most commonly in your chest. A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is inserted into a vein in your arm and threaded to the deeper, central veins. An intrathecal catheter delivers chemotherapeutic drugs directly into the spinal fluid. An intracavitary catheter (IC) is placed in the abdomen, pelvis, or chest.
You may experience no side effects or just a few. The kind of side effects and how severe they are will depend on the type and dose of chemotherapy and how your body reacts. Some of the more common side effects are described below.
Fatigue, feeling tired and lacking energy, is the most common symptom experienced by people receiving chemotherapy. Fatigue from chemotherapy feels different from the fatigue that you may experience from everyday life. Chemotherapy fatigue can appear suddenly. Some people have described it as a total lack of energy, feeling drained or wiped out. The fatigue can last days, weeks, or months, but it usually goes away gradually as your body responds to treatment.
Nausea and vomiting are common side effects of several chemotherapeutic agents. Chemotherapeutic drugs irritate the lining of the stomach and the first section of the small intestine (duodenum), which stimulates certain nerves that lead to the vomiting center of the brain. This results in nausea and vomiting.
Although every patient is different, certain drugs are more emetic (likely to cause vomiting) than others.
Talk with your doctor to see if one or a combination of these anti-emetic medications is right for you.
Chemotherapeutic drugs can cause painful side effects as well. They can damage nerves, most often in the fingers and toes, which leads to burning, numbness, tingling, or shooting pain. Some drugs also cause mouth sores, headaches, muscle sores, and stomach pains. Because not everyone who undergoes chemotherapy experiences pain, it is important to let your doctor know if you feel pain. Steps can be taken to relieve it. There are many different medications and methods to help control pain.
To help your doctor determine how to best control your pain, keep track of the timing, location, and characteristic of your pain and what you have done to make it better or worse. It is helpful to develop a pain scale to describe how much pain you feel. Try to assign a number from 0 to 10; 0 means you feel no pain and as your pain increases, so does the number.
The goal of pain control is to prevent pain that can be prevented and to control pain that cannot be prevented. Talk with your doctor to determine what method or methods will work best for you.
Hair loss, or
, is a notorious side effect of chemotherapy, but not all chemotherapeutic drugs cause hair loss. Talk with your doctor to see if the regimen you are on may cause hair loss.
Hair loss usually occurs between 10 and 21 days after drug administration. It may happen suddenly and in large amounts or hair may fall out gradually. Hair loss is temporary and hair should grow back after treatment is stopped.
Although not life-threatening, hair loss can be very upsetting. Many people buy a wig or hairpiece, or use hats or scarves, to cover their head. If you buy a wig because of cancer treatment, it is a tax-deductible expense and may be covered in part by health insurance.
One of the most common side effects of chemotherapy is bone marrow suppression, also known as myelosuppression. Bone marrow is the tissue inside of some bones, such as the sternum (breastbone), hip, femur (thigh), and humerus (upper arm), which produces white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets. Because cells in the bone marrow tissue grow and divide rapidly, they are susceptible to the effects of chemotherapy.
Blood normally has between 4,000 and 10,000 WBCs per cubic millimeter. When your white blood cell count falls, it is known as leukopenia. The main function of white blood cells is to help the body resist infection. Because the white blood cells play such an important role in your health, your healthcare provider will monitor your white blood cell level carefully.
Naturally occurring hematopoietic growth factors stimulate the production of different types of blood cells. These growth factors can be produced in a laboratory and are available as drugs. The two growth factors that stimulate production of white blood cells are granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). They are frequently given the day after you start chemotherapy and for up to two weeks.
Report any signs of infection to your doctor immediately.
Erythropoietin is a naturally occurring growth factor that stimulates red blood cell production. Procrit and EPO are the drug forms. The medication is usually given three times per week by injection under the skin, until red blood cell counts rises.
Very low platelet counts can lead to serious internal bleeding. If your platelet counts fall (usually below 10,000), you may be given platelet transfusions. Oprelvekin (Neumega), a platelet growth factor, can be given if you have severe thrombocytopenia.
Many chemotherapy medicines cause a decrease or complete loss of appetite. Each person is different and there is no way to predict how chemotherapy will affect you. But, appetite loss and weight loss can range from mild to severe and may lead to malnutrition, which is known as cachexia. The decrease in appetite is usually temporary. Your appetite should return after chemotherapy has stopped, but it may take several weeks.
Because chemotherapy can alter your sensation of taste, the therapy can affect the way some foods taste and smell to you, adding to your poor appetite and weight loss. Your taste and smell should return to normal several weeks after chemotherapy has ended.
In order for your body to fight the cancer and cope with chemotherapy, it is important that you get proper nutrition. If you are experiencing loss of appetite, talk with your doctor—there are medications that can help.
Some chemotherapeutic drugs can cause sores and inflammation in the mouth, known as stomatitis. Changes in the throat (pharyngitis) or esophagus (esophagitis) can also occur. Mucositis is the term used to refer to inflammation of the lining of the mouth, throat, and esophagus.
Each person is different. You may experience one or two of the following side effects, or you may experience none. Don't feel embarrassed to talk with your doctor about your concerns regarding sexual and reproductive side effects.
For details on the use of chemotherapy for specific cancers, see the following articles:
Bladder cancer
Brain tumors
Breast cancer
Cervical cancer
Colorectal cancer
Esophageal cancer
| Hodgkin's lymphoma
Kidney cancer
Lung cancer
Multiple myeloma
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Ovarian cancer
Pancreatic cancer
Prostate cancer
Stomach cancer
Testicular cancer
Thyroid cancer
Uterine (endometrial) cancer
Last reviewed March 2015 by Mohei Abouzied, MD, FACP
All EBSCO Publishing proprietary, consumer health and medical information found on this site is accredited by URAC. URAC's Health Web Site Accreditation Program requires compliance with 53 rigorous standards of quality and accountability, verified by independent audits. To send comments or feedback to our Editorial Team regarding the content please email us at
This content is reviewed regularly and is updated when new and relevant evidence is made available. This information is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with questions regarding a medical condition.
Editorial Policy | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | SupportCopyright © 2008 EBSCO Publishing All rights reserved.
© 2015 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215
617-667-7000 | TDD: 800-439-0183 | Maps & Directions


text:
Return to Top
Take the steps to begin your journey:
Take the steps to begin your journey:
Mission Statement
Residential Living & Learning seeks to foster authentic communities that engage and empower residents to value learning, citizenship and diversity through faculty and peer engagement.
Guiding Principles
- Our philosophy and service standards describe the experience we provide.
- We invite you to explore our Living & Learning links to see how we integrate academics to encourage learning outside the classroom.
- We cannot create a wonderful environment without you! Living in community holds some responsibility and we recommend that you review our Guide to Community Living to learn more.
Check these links for important dates, guidelines and information helpful for on-campus residents.
* Beginning Fall 2015 students living at the Grove Apartments will receive a commuter parking permit


text:
Hi all,I started the kickstart yesterday and it's going we'll so far. However, I'm suseptable to migraines and I've had a migraine since yesterday afternoon. It's a low grade one but it's persistent.
I'm wondering if it could be a detox reaction. Before the kickstart, I wasn't eating meat but I was eating a LOT of junk food, especially cheese and chocolate. I went fron mega junk tood all day to eating a lot of veggies and beans. So maybe my body is adjusting to the healthy food. I've also had, erm, bathroom issues (probably because of the sudden increase of fiber) which is why I'm thinking that it's detox.
Probably a detox effect. Rest assured that animal products are a common trigger for migraines, so you may feel better outcomes from this diet in the long run.
Susan Levin, MS, RDPCRM Director of Nutrition Education
I don't know from a medical standpoint but I felt crappy the first couple days and *tmi* my body wasn't happy with the meat I did eat for so long...I felt sluggish and yucky. Now, I'm feeling more energetic. Perhaps that's your body transferring over?
Thank you to all who responded. It's just very frustrating. I was eating the wrong things for weeks that included migraine-triggers like cheese and chocolate and I didn't have any migraines. Now that I'm eating the right things, I've had non-stop migraines (low-grade, it's true, and they've been off and on) since Day 1! I think I was in denial about how addicted my body really was to the junk food I was eating. This morning I feel slightly better (though the migraine is still very slight in the background). I'm really hoping it will eventually go away today.
Other than that, I have been feeling pretty good. My energy level has gone way up. I used to have to have a nap in the middle of the day because I was just exhausted. But I haven't felt that need (though I have been napping just because of the migraines but if I didn't have them, I wouldn't be). So this is a good sign.
I'm just going to continue to do what I'm doing!
I know I'm late, but if you're still having the migraines, you may want to try a natural laxative to help ease the detox symptoms.
I know I'm late, but if you're still having the migraines, you may want to try a natural laxative (ie: cascara sagrada) to help ease the detox symptoms.
Did you stop caffene suddenly?bad idea...must be weaned off or will trigger migraine. another idea which has helped me avoid many migraines.try magnesium.you must use the powder form for best absorption.(used to be available only in europe but now i got in vitamin shop)the brand i used is called magnesium fizz.very good for leg cramps also. don't know if this will help you but wont hurt you either. plenty of water also. feel better!
There are 269 active user sessions right now.
home | contact
us | about us | support us | full disclaimer | privacy policy
PCRM Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
5100 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., Ste. 400, Washington, DC 20016
Phone: 202-686-2210 | E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
Returning Customers
If you are a registered user, please enter your ART portal username and password.
Commander Role Book
Item# 83018
Member Price [?]
Non-Member Price
- Sales Unit: each
- Pages: 80 pages
- Material Type: Softcover
- Dimensions: 8 x 6
Learn specifics of how to serve children and youth, run an Awana meeting, use Awana curriculum and share God's Word. Included are lessons on effective leadership.
Get access to reference tools that will have you coming back to your role book again and again. Includes a resource DVD with videos demonstrating skills, casting vision and featuring Q&A sessions with experienced leaders, as well as a CD containing a library of tips, forms and additional information to help you lead your Awana ministry.


text:
A record-breaking powerboat pilot has survived crashing at 130 mph on Coniston Water.
Keith Whittle, 57, from Hayling Island in Hampshire, was taking part in the Power Boat Records Week when his boat flipped. The annual event has been running in the Lake District for over 40 years.
Mr Whittle escaped with minor injuries but his accident was reminiscent of Donald Campbell's fatal crash in January 1967.
The accident was caught on film by a spectator and Keith reflected on the incident in an interview with the BBC: www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJlt-WjeAIE
BBC Radio 1 DJ's Chris Moyles and Greg James are packing their bags early and taking their shows to Carlisle a week before Radio 1's Big Weekend.
The pair will broadcast their shows live from Cumbria from Monday (May 9) to Friday (May 13) when they arrive a week ahead of the main event. In addition to their daily shows, Chris, Greg and their teams will be getting out and about in the city and surrounding areas, meeting the residents and celebrating all that Carlisle has to offer.
The pair will immerse themselves in the local community for a whole week, and they also plan to meet the city's students in a Q&A session during the week.
Chris Moyles says: "The Big Weekend is always the highlight of my year and I'm so excited that we get to go up to Carlisle for a whole week beforehand and settle in before everyone else arrives. I'm hoping the good people of Carlisle are going to show us a good time!''
Greg James adds: "I'm really looking forward to this year's Big Weekend and to bring my show live from Carlisle. Chris and I will be out and about meeting the locals during the week and I'm hoping we can experience the best of the city!"
BBC Radio 1's Big Weekend is the UK's biggest free ticketed festival and 40,000 lucky music fans will be able to enjoy performances across four stages at Carlisle Airfield where the event is taking place – the Main Stage; the In New Music We Trust Stage; the Outdoor Stage and the BBC Introducing Stage. This year's artists include, Lady Gaga, Foo Fighters, The Black Eyed Peas, Tinie Tempah and Ellie Goulding.
A truly multiplatform experience, Radio 1's Big Weekend will be broadcast on Radio 1, with a major interactive presence online and many live performances available to watch on demand. There will be highlights on BBC Three and extended performances can be seen via BBC Red Button on digital TV during the weekend.