text:
Mon-Fri: 7am-1am EST / Sat-Sun: 7am-11pm EST
ApplianceHotpoint Refrigerator
Level of DifficultyReally easy
Time to do repairLess than 15 mins
Age of ApplianceMore than 10 years
Screw drivers
0 out of 1 people found this instruction helpful
The parts arrived in one day and I did not order them express. I pulled the two drawers out undid the four screws pulled the old pieces out held the new rails up put in the four screws put the drawers back in and I was done the wife said if it was that easy why did you not do this three years ago. It was the easiest repair I have ever done. Thank you for the fast service.Greg
Help other customers find the most helpful instructions.
Were these instructions helpful?
Part Number: PS306910
Part Number: PS306912
All brand logos are trademarks of their respective owners.
The PartSelect logo is a Registered Trademark of Atlantic Laundry Centres, Ltd.
Copyright © 1999-2015 , Eldis Group Partnership. All rights reserved.


text:
|Thread Tools
|Search this Thread
|Display Modes
|Mar 27, 2012, 03:08 PM
|Mar 27, 2012, 06:56 PM
How about this, do a GeekBench test using v2.2.6 or v2.2.7. Those are the newest versions that are now giving accurate numbers that work with any Intel or Xeon Processor for both Mac Pro Towers and Hackies alike. Please post your score. Also, you can use Cinebench 11.5, but it's not as up to date as GB. In any case do both and then lets see what you come up with. If you can't that's cool, just go on GB's website and compare my score (below):
Geekbench Score: 18,584 / Cinebench 11.5: OpenGL: 46.13 fps, CPU: 10.79 pts
with some of the Top Mac Pro Towers out there (here):
and even with my ONE 6 CORE W3680 @ 4.2GHz, I'm running circles around dual processor mac towers (that currently cost 3+ more $$$ than the one I own). Now although you are seeing these Mac Towers getting 21,000+ GB scores, those scores were done with an older (less accurate) version of GB. The new GB versions (that I already mentioned) are actually making the GB scores a bit lower. But even it they weren't; think about it. I'm going to spend $6,800 for a Mac Pro that I can build on my own for $1,600 for me to be only about 5% to 7% slower in rendering power when all I have to do is build two systems to chain them together to create a rendering farm, for a total of $3,200 that will DOMINATE any Mac Pro period.
Aside from that, I'm now learning to Underclock with my SR-2 Setup and you can see for yourself what my latest GB score is. Here it is:
32,998 !!! Mind you I'm on page 2 of the top scores (found here):
Again, I RUN CIRCLES around any top of the line Mac out there now. Please show me an actual Mac Pro that is getting anywhere close to 33,000... please show me...
BTW, I couldn't have done any of this without the help and tutelage of... Tutor - THANKS AGAIN !!! Also, if you haven't noticed go onto the same page here:
and take a gander of Tutors Underclocking GB scores. Now that's where I want to be, but even if it doesn't happen, I will remain grateful with what I have knowing it's already a beast of a machine...
|Mar 28, 2012, 12:26 AM
But seriously I'd rather not do a Hackintosh. Don't get me wrong, I used to build PCs when I was younger and enjoyed the process...however, those blue lights and fans with LED's and ugly curves need to go away on the PC side. It's just terrible design.
PC case manufactuers do not understand utilitarian minimalism. They are just engineers.
|Mar 28, 2012, 01:57 AM
|Mar 28, 2012, 02:23 AM
|Mar 28, 2012, 02:44 AM
This ridiculous talk about 'Tutor'. It's hilarious. Like he's some kind of superhero trainer.
|Mar 28, 2012, 03:32 AM
Hackintoshes are sick. There are amazing rigs around. The thing is you can make them cheap with crap cases and this is what most people do (including me). But if you really want to, they are some great cases (like Californian NZXT or swedish Fractal Design) which achieve a great look. It does not look the same style as an Apple computer but it looks as good and at least you get a genuine computer.
Large companies do no buy Hackintoshes because this is not something you can easily integrate in your workflow. That's it. Nothing to see with reliability or anything. But freelancers more and more build them I am pretty sure.
Hackintosh G31M-S2L - Macbook 3,1
|Mar 28, 2012, 04:23 AM
If you really love your mac, build a Hackintosh at least once
5 years ago when I first moved out of my home country and into another one for business, I wanted to setup a Mac Desktop. At the time, most Apple desktop offerings were weak with the Mac Pro being more than I wanted to spend. Not to mention, in my new country the price of Macs was about 30% higher than the global average. I remember hearing about some hacks who had gotten OSX to run on Intel, so I started to search around and one thing led to another and I started to stay up late... a lot. After a week or two, I got OSX up and running on my old Alienware gaming rig. It was a P4 and ran dog slow, so I started to read about motherboards that were doing well with OSX, like the Intel Badaxe, which was the the hackintosh mobo of choice about 4 years ago. Anyway, very long story short I ended up writing one of the most widely used 10.5 guides on the web. It's one of 2 stickied guides on insanelymac. Learning about kext files, how to write my own for hardware I wanted to run, learning to make my own installers, boot files, and more... I can tell you made me so strong with the mac, that window looks alien to me and I have all my MSFT certifications and built MSFT networks for 10 years.
Build a hackintosh... even if it's just for fun. But if you want to run one for serious. Here is what you want to know.
1. Be prepared to manage your hackintosh for each update. While updates might go smoothly, you MIGHT get some unexpected results and be prepared to repair your install.
2. Tweaks and bugs. Be prepared for lots of little bugs n tweaks that you will need to apply fixes for.
3. Get the most widely used hardware in the forums. This will make it easy for you to get the most support you will need.
4. Have a lot of backups
5. Don't expect it to be as worry free as a real mac
Now I think that the Hackintosh fills a void in the mac line up that they have ignored. Apple creates amazing notebooks and notebooks that look like monitors and then they create this over kill desktop Mac Pro which is totally perfect for most creative professionals. But they are missing out on the desktop enthusiast computer user. The hackintosh fills that void...and if Apple wanted to fill it, they could release an awesome desktop tomorrow that got to be updated every 280 days because they wouldn't have to wait for Intel server grade ship refreshes.
The hackintosh community is great, if you make yourself a rig, you will certainly enjoy it and save a lot of money over a MP. The speed you can get out of a Hack is just amazing. I just built myself a home server with the new sandy bridge E Xeon in it... 32GB of ram... Asus mobo. When it was done, I was like...HMMM hackintosh? haha
I say go for it... it's been like 2 years since Apple updated the MP, thats pathetic.
|Mar 28, 2012, 05:36 AM
Hi! Sorry to interrupt and divert this thread, but I read it with attention, and it got me wondering whether I could run OS X Lion/Snow Leopard on my current PC. Being able to do so would answer the conundrum I'm currently facing (I'll soon need a Mac)
I already have a pretty good PC (W3580 Xeon, 12GB of ECC RAM, an SSD drive, a great case, and a GTX 570). I use it with W7, mostly for 3D work.
However, it's a Lenovo S20, with its original, propietary (I think) motherboard, and I cannot find a clear answer as to whether or not I can install OS X on it.
I always find lists of compatible parts, but I need to know if the hardware I already have would work.
Can you point me in the right direction?
|Mar 28, 2012, 09:07 AM
About you mentioning about terrible designs, I'm with you on that. As I mentioned earlier I'd been a loyal Mac Pro user for 15+ years; this is back in the day when I was using the Quadra 605 25Mhz (http://www.everymac.com/systems/appl...uadra_605.html). I just cracked open the manuals and started learning how to use Phototshop, Macromedia Freehand, Quark Xpress. But aside from that I wanted to make sure that I found a case that was going to be just as "air-cooling" efficient as possible and have a clean look and unfortunately I couldn't find one. That is until I saw this:
This was about about as close to a Mac Pro tower as I could find, but better. It (literally) turned everything around. This was the only case that uses Vertical Positive Pressure Air-Flow designing, that simply is not found in any other companies PC cases; not even Apple. Now if you really like the Mac look, you can settle for the Silver model, but since this is a Hackie, I wanted the black one as this (to me) is the "Black Sheep of the Family."
When it comes to all the lights and everything else you don't like, the great thing about this case (as in other PC cases) is you don't have to have that. You can just choose a case without the window. Me on the other hand I love to show off my "engine," like a Hot Rod. Like this case here:
It's the top few pics that show off the Silverstone FT02. Now to me, that is an amazing case. I especially love the digitally etched Hackintosh logo that was put on the side of the case. But even if you don't like this case there are others (although not as air efficient as the FT02 and other Silverstone PC Cases) that have clean, tight looking features that you would be able to appreciate. But anyway, these are just my thoughts.
Lastly, all I'm going to say is show me YOUR rendering scores... 'nuff said on that... :roll eyes:
Last edited by SR2Mac; Mar 28, 2012 at 06:50 PM.
|Mar 28, 2012, 09:18 AM
|Mar 28, 2012, 10:11 AM
The poster above you is 100% right. Start with the most common pieces on the Hackintosh forums.
Hackintosh G31M-S2L - Macbook 3,1
|Mar 28, 2012, 10:19 AM
What's my name? What's in a name? Love is the key.
My superhero trainer: Leonardo Da Vinci - so I play my piano and other keyboards, trumpet, harmonica, sax and guitar and never neglect drawing, painting, programing and creating videos and 2d and 3d animations.
If computer performance is the game, then currently "Tutor" is one of the names. I'm a paradoxical contrarion when it comes to computer performance - make it slow to make it fast.
When it comes to health - shun medicines and embrace the natural - former diabetic relying on the norm - insulin, then developed a tasty drink made of every fruit, vegetable, and herb I could buy [I call my last batch VF 102], drinking it twice daily with breakfast and dinner, and within a year diabetes found my shell intolerable, so it vacated me.
When it comes to aging, view it as a motivator and opportunity to strive for physical goals formerly shelved - like dunking the basketball (now with goal at 9 feet, but my goal for the goal is at 10) - am 5'11 and will be age 59 in a few months.
When it comes to change - never say, "never" - we lack omniscience.
When it comes to challenges - never say, "can't" - I strive to be the best workplace problem solver, management trainer, systems analyst, network administrator, software developer, inventor, universal repairman, plumber, electrician, gardener, nutritionist, bodybuilder, basketball player, musician, artist and chef that I can be and thrive on the processes.
When it comes to being - never say, "die." Shells may die, but we're not essentially shells - a cancer survivor's spirit will live on, just as the parts of Leonardo's and others' spirit we choose to embrace.
But most importantly, always remember (and especially live by the rule) that we are our brothers' and sisters' keepers wherever, whenever and however they may be. We are this world and our actions and inactions define its state. Thus, I abide by faith, hope, and love, but when forced to choose only one - love always prevails.
24 tweaked systems: GTX980 RE>86; ME=180K+ CUDA cores; 13K+ ATI Stream PUs; 278 CPU cores. CB11.5-48.5 Win; CB15-3,791 Win; GB2-58K+ Lnx; GB3-71K+ Lnx/49K+ OSX; Sala-20.3K+; OctaneBench-905.23
Last edited by Tutor; Mar 28, 2012 at 10:58 AM.
|Mar 28, 2012, 07:06 PM
Hey Roel, when you have a moment please go here and see my new UNDERCLOCKED GB scores:
Now go here and look at what page I'm on:
I never thought I would even get on page 50, let alone page 2. I'm now with the big boys.
Now the BEST Mac Pro hasn't been able to go over 25,000+ on GeekBench and with Tutor's help, I'm now able to do it at 33781, so... that makes my machine over 35% faster and less than 1/3 the cost. I think that's amazing...
PS - Again, I couldn't have done this without Tutors (as well as others) contributing their many hours to help. Thanks again Tutor...
Last edited by SR2Mac; Mar 28, 2012 at 08:58 PM.
|Mar 29, 2012, 03:47 AM
Paying it forward. Thanks to d00d's precision at system emulation.
24 tweaked systems: GTX980 RE>86; ME=180K+ CUDA cores; 13K+ ATI Stream PUs; 278 CPU cores. CB11.5-48.5 Win; CB15-3,791 Win; GB2-58K+ Lnx; GB3-71K+ Lnx/49K+ OSX; Sala-20.3K+; OctaneBench-905.23
Last edited by Tutor; Mar 29, 2012 at 04:05 AM.
|Mar 29, 2012, 09:00 AM
Last edited by SR2Mac; Mar 29, 2012 at 09:48 AM.
|Mar 30, 2012, 05:15 PM
@ Tutor
I enjoyed your post, it was a great laugh. Thanks for that.
@ SR2Mac
I seriously don't get it why you would like me to show you my benchmark scores why would it interest you. I don't even have a Mac Pro or hackingtosh nor do I care about UNDERCLOCKING (why the caps all the time?) my computer. Your behavior reminds me of this great picture:
|Mar 30, 2012, 05:40 PM
|Mar 30, 2012, 06:06 PM
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD; Eizo fs2333
|Mar 30, 2012, 09:13 PM
24 tweaked systems: GTX980 RE>86; ME=180K+ CUDA cores; 13K+ ATI Stream PUs; 278 CPU cores. CB11.5-48.5 Win; CB15-3,791 Win; GB2-58K+ Lnx; GB3-71K+ Lnx/49K+ OSX; Sala-20.3K+; OctaneBench-905.23
|Mar 30, 2012, 09:56 PM
To Roel,
It's too bad you missed the point. I was trying to show you the value of learning something different, that I now see has incredible value. No worries at least I (and a few others out there that over time will not only appreciate what Tutor has taken the time to show me) will benefit from this. There's a couple passages in the Bible that come to mind when I think about the last comment that you left me (and others to see):
Matthew 7:3 "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"
Matthew 7:6 ""Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces."
Again, it's too bad you don't see the value in all of this. Well, at least I'm allowed to reap the benefits, because a man like Tutor could have just ignored wanting to show me his method and say "figure it out yourself." But he was kind enough to show me how to not only do it, but also help me to figure it out on my own. People like him are a rare find. (Thanks again, Tutor... )
Lastly, I think derbothaus also said it correct by saying "Not sure why you are here provoking people then." Thank you derbothaus for pointing that out. I thought I would be the only one who saw that... Again, thanks... Later...
BTW Roel, please don't insult yourself and say "I seriously don't get it why you would like me to show you my benchmark scores " You KNOW why I said that - I was "putting the ball back in your court..."
Last edited by SR2Mac; Mar 30, 2012 at 10:07 PM.
|Mar 31, 2012, 12:05 AM
I see that PunkNugget gave you some credit and also looks like he was reaching out to you. Have you tried to get back in touch with him? His comment was left here:
"TUTOR (where are you Dixie Man man, I've been trying to reach out? Call me when you get a moment)."
Do you know him?
|Mar 31, 2012, 05:45 AM
24 tweaked systems: GTX980 RE>86; ME=180K+ CUDA cores; 13K+ ATI Stream PUs; 278 CPU cores. CB11.5-48.5 Win; CB15-3,791 Win; GB2-58K+ Lnx; GB3-71K+ Lnx/49K+ OSX; Sala-20.3K+; OctaneBench-905.23
|Mar 31, 2012, 05:50 AM
Unfortunately the Pro is very expensive (the base-model) and I have no need for Xeon processors but that's not necessarily a problem. Though buying three-year-old tech (Nehalem) for that amount of money is a little against my taste. And because Apple won't develop the more affordable fabled xMac I started looking on the mackintosh threads/websites to find out whether it's hassle-free. Unfortunately it's not as hassle-free as I'd like though but I might give it a try sometime just for having more HDD bays and a non-mobile GPU. Depends on Apple's offering of the new base-model Mac Pro.
You were trying to show me something that you find extremely important and shoved it via all possible ways (PM's seriously?) in my face. And now you show up with Bible citations It suddenly becomes clear to me.
|Mar 31, 2012, 10:58 AM
^^ So confused. Thanks for explaining and keeping a level head Roel. I just quit smoking after 18 years so I am a little on edge lately. Please don't take any offense I thought you were trolling.
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD; Eizo fs2333
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
|Thread Tools
|Search this Thread
|Display Modes
Linear Mode
|Similar Threads
|Thread Starter
|Last Post
|Hackintosh Mac Pro
|Mac Pro
|Feb 27, 2014 04:29 PM
|From Hackintosh to Turbo Mac Pro
|Mac Pro
|Aug 15, 2013 06:24 AM
|3.1 Mac Pro or iMac or Hackintosh
|Buying Tips and Advice
|Mar 27, 2013 11:21 PM
|For Lion Server: 2011 Mac mini, 2006/8 Mac Pro, or Hackintosh?
|Mac mini
|Mar 15, 2013 12:14 AM
|Mac Pro/Hackintosh...
|Mac Pro
|Mar 7, 2013 12:54 PM
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Easter Eggs Pixar Hid In "Brave"
How do you get the Pizza Planet truck into a movie set hundreds of years before the invention of the combustible engine? Very, very sneakily.
In the scene in the witch's hut, she is emphatic that she only carves bears…and pizza trucks as you can see in the lower left corner of this screen capture.
During another part of the scene, you can see Sully from Monsters Inc. carved into a slab of wood in the witch's house.
This post was created by a user and has not been vetted or endorsed by BuzzFeed's editorial staff. BuzzFeed Community is a place where anyone can post awesome lists and creations. Learn more or post your buzz!


text:
16 Angel Crafts to Make: Homemade Christmas Ornaments & Decorations
Bonus: Get our newsletter & special offers for free. We will not share or sell your email address. View our Privacy Policy
Balsam Sachet Ornaments
By: Melony Bradley
We are adding the craft to your Craft Projects.
The project was added to your Craft Projects.
Click here to view your Craft Projects.
Looking for a completely unique Christmas ornament craft? Make Balsam Sachet Ornaments from Melony Bradley! This is a fantastic craft that isn't difficult to make.
- Cardstock square
- Burlap
- Fusible webbing sheet
- Red ticking
- Muslin
- Stamp
- Pigment ink
- Scissors
- Sewing machine
- Used dryer sheet
- Balsam
- Polyfil stuffing
- Brad
- Wire
Use a 6" cardstock square as a template to trace and cut out two pieces of burlap for the sachet.
Cut a 9 x 12 fusible webbing sheet in half. I like to use Lite Steam a Seam by The Warm Co. Fuse the sheet halves to red ticking and muslin, making sure fabrics are wrinkle free. Remember to turn off your steam function on your iron when fusing. Always leave a slight border around the fabrics to make sure the fusible webbing does not stick to your ironing board.
Now comes the fabric stamping part. Choose stamps you wish to use and use pigment ink to stamp on the fused muslin. You can also use a specially formulated ink for fabric. Pigment ink, heat set with the iron on a low setting works just as well.
Stamp the burlap with a background image of your choice that will show up well such a florals or swirls. Burlap does not show the stamped images as well as the muslin, so the images need to be bold.
Now cut out the stamped muslin motifs, leaving an 1/4 around the edges for stitching. Cut a fused red ticking piece, approx 1/4- 3/8 larger than the stamped motif.
Center the pieces on the stamped burlap square that will be the front piece of the sachet and fuse with an iron. (if your pieces seem uneven, don't fret, I find that uneven edges only add to the country charm!)
Get out your sewing machine. Straight stitch the edges of the ticking and muslin border with a dark colored thread for contrast. if you don't want contrast, use a light color to match the muslin.
Now is a good time to create your dryer sheet sachet. You will need one used dryer sheet cut to two pieces of 3 1/2" squares. After you straight stitch the muslin and ticking edges, straight stitch three sides of the dryer sheet together.
Fill the sachet with a small hand full of balsam. Straight stitch the top opening closed to secure. (Note- if you are not comfortable machine stitching with the balsam inside the sachet, hand stitch. When machine stitching, make sure you do not overstuff the sachet. You don't want to end up with balsam inside your machine parts!)
Place the two burlap squares together. Machine stitch together about 1/2 from the edges (seam allowance.) Start at the bottom left edges and stitch left, top and right side together but leave the bottom open for turning and stuffing. Steam the seams open on all four sides.
Turn the right sides out. If needed, use a blunt object to push out corners. From the bottom opening, stuff the sachet with the balsam sachet and a small amount (golf ball sized) of polyfil stuffing. If you are using a brad to embellish as I did, go ahead and insert the brad while the bottom is opening to make it easier. As an option, you can sew on a button embellishment later. Whipstich the bottom opening closed.
- Finally, insert a piece of wire for the hanger, inserting the ends into the balsam at the top and bending to make secure. Tie on a bit of tulle and you are finished!
Tags / Related Topics
Your Recently Viewed Projects
Images from other crafters
Love these projects? Get MORE delivered to your Inbox – FREE Click Here!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Are you sure you would like to report this comment? It will be flagged for our moderators to take action.
Thank you for taking the time to improve the content on our site.
What's Hot
- 50+ Simple Homemade Christmas Ornaments
- 28 Ornaments to Give or Keep for Yourself
- Folded Flower Ball Ornament
- Santa and Snowman Ornament
- Bird's Nest Clay Pot Christmas Ornaments
- A Peaceful Angel Ornament
- Beaded CD Ornaments
- Heart Felt Ornaments Tutorial
- Beaded Crystal Ornaments
- Festive Ice Skate Ornaments
Something worth saving?
- SAVE all your favorite crafts
- ADD personal notes
- QUICKLY reference your crafts
Free eBooks
- 12 Fabulous Picnic Craft Ideas + Restaurant Copycat Recipes
- 14 Toilet Paper Roll Craft Ideas
- 17 Flower Craft Ideas: How To Make Paper Flowers, Easy Fabric Flowers and More
- 4th of July Crafts and Recipes
- Crafts for Father's Day: 36 Homemade Father's Day Gift Ideas
- Crafts for Mom: 30 Free Craft Projects for Mother's Day
- Garden Crafts
- Graduation Crafts
- How To Make Tie Dye Shirts, Dcor & More: 18 Tie Dye Patterns
- The Best Blogger Craft Ideas 2015: Home Decor Ideas, DIY Jewelry, Easy Crochet Patterns and More
Our Newest Projects & Articles
- 14 Beginner Crochet Patterns For Your Kitchen
- Craft-a-Day: 365 Simple Handmade Projects
- Jessica Potasz
- Full of Love Crochet Mason Jar Cozy Pattern
- Colorful DIY Agenda Planner
- Blinged Out DIY Cell Phone Case
- Egg Carton Flower Fairies
- Spring Flower DIY Wreath
- Ric Rac Rose Earrings
- Toilet Paper Roll Paint Stamps


text:
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/1270
|Advanced Biomimetic Materials for Reversible CO2 Capture from Air [abstract]
|Glaser, Rainer, 1957-; Yin, Jian
|University of Missouri (System)
Power Generation
carbon capture and storage (CSS)
greenhouse gas emissions
CO2 scrubbing
|The world is rightly focused on climate change. The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) identified carbon capture and storage (CSS) as a critical technology for reducing emissions, not only from power plants but also from industries that manufacture cement, chemicals and steel. The capture of CO2 from air and its long-term storage also presents the method of last resort to combat excessive atmospheric CO2 concentrations. IPPC concluded that the world has to reverse the increase of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 to avert disastrous environment consequences. Modern societies largely rely on the fossil fuels to generate energy (electricity, heat, etc.) and as fuels for transportation, and the principle mode of fossil fuel use involves its direct combustion to water and carbon dioxide. Efforts to reduce CO2 emissions are directed at improving the combustion efficiency and/or at the development of technologies for carbon capture and storage (CCS). The fuel combustion efficiency depends on the type of fuel (coal, gaseous or liquid hydrocarbons, H2), the oxidizing agent (air, O2-enriched air, stream), and combustion conditions (pres., temp., cat.). It is the primary aim of CCS technologies to capture CO2 at the source and its long-term storage. The 2007 MIT study "The Future of Coal" concluded that "CCS is the critical enabling technology that would reduce CO2 emissions significantly while also allowing coal to meet the world's pressing energy needs." The three major approaches to CCS involve post-combustion scrubbing, oxyfuel, and pre-combustion decarbonization technologies. It is the goal of our research to develop advanced materials for CO2 scrubbing. Nature has evolved five pathways for autotrophic CO2 fixation and our approach is inspired by the mechanism of the photosynthetic carbon assimilation via the Calvin-Bassham-Benson cycle. The mechanism of the Rubisco-catalysis involves the activation by way of carbamylation of active-site Lys by an activator CO2 (ACO2), and the carbamate thus formed is stabilized by complexation to Mg2+ and by NH...OC hydrogen-bonding. We present results of theoretical and mechanistic studies of organic materials that mimic Rubisco's capacity for reversible CO2 capture and discuss the fixation of these materials on porous, solid supports to achieve large-scale CO2 scrubbing from ambient air.
Items in MOspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


text:
- Treatments & Info
- Find a Doctor
- Ask a Doctor
- Before & After
Ultrasound guided sclerofoam is an endovenous chemical treatment for varicose veins which is performed under local anesthesia. While injecting foam loaded with a sclerosing agent into a troublesome vein, the phlebotomist performing the procedure is able to watch the needle on a monitor. This gives him or her a view of the damaged area and ensures that all of the varicose veins receive treatment. Doctors prefer to use ultrasound guided sclerofoam on patients with small to medium-sized varicose veins, and it produces excellent results in over eighty percent of those treated. The side effects are minimal, but include some swelling and bruising which should disappear over a few days time. No hospitalization is need for those undergoing ultrasound guided sclerofoam, but the procedure should be done by a medical physician. Though treatment with ultrasound guided sclerofoam may cost half of the amount as a surgical procedure, it could be slightly more expensive than laser treatments. It doesn't, however, require time off from work which does save money, and it isn't painful. The results of ultrasound guided sclerofoam should last for years, but, if necessary, additional treatments can be performed. Those considering a procedure to relieve the symptoms of varicose veins should search for a local provider. A simple phone call will help to determine if you are a suitable candidate.
About Vein Center of Louisiana
Established in 1992, the Vein Center of Louisiana was the first clinic in the state dedicated to the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins and spider veins. Although Dr. Ingram had practiced vascularsurgery since 1979, new advances in thetreatment of venousdisease developed inEurope prompted him to study them andbeamong the first in this country to offer theseservices here. In 1992, he was the first in Louisiana to perform the Ambulatory Phlebectomyprocedure for varicose veins using the sutureless European microsurgery technique. In 2001, Dr. Ingram was the first in Louisiana to perform the Endovenous Ablation procedures for varicose veins, both the RF Closure device and the Laser. The Vein Center of Louisiana has also been on the cutting edge in the cosmetic treatment of unattractive spider veins using both the latest technology (laser) and the latest techniques (foam sclerotherapy) as well as traditional sclerotherapy. Many physicians from around the country have visited the Vein Center to learn various techniques from Dr. Ingram, including specialists in the fields of plastic surgery, heart surgery, vascular surgery, dermatology, general surgery, anesthesiology and OB-Gyn.
Additional Information on Procedures performed by Vein Center of Louisiana
Featured Specialist for Ultrasound Guided Sclerofoam in Lafayette, LA
Call Now: (866) 479-6120 155 Hospital DriveSuite 201Lafayette, LA 70503Contact Doctor


text:
Good values on homes are still available, as the number of homes listed for sale is greater than the number of homes being sold. Great deals can be found by determined buyers.
Not enough data to determine market type. Consult a local REALTOR® for up-to-date market summaries
Trend data coming soon.
Trend data coming soon.
|For Sale: 6
|New: N/A
|Recently Sold: 3
|Reduced: 4
|Average Home Price
|Average Sold Price
|Property Records: 415
|Foreclosed: N/A
The average home price in 29453 is $200,984, which is 55.8% higher than the average sold price in 29453 ($128,967) . The average home price per square foot in 29453 is $104 and about 1% of all homes in 29453 sold in the last 6 months. For 29453 home values, real estate prices, and city market trends, research the 415 property records or search our 3 recently sold or 6 homes for sale listings. The listings and properties in 29453 are only a part of the 1,694,652 properties and 45,247 homes for sale in South Carolina. Because of this, the average home price and average home value of 29453 also influence the average home price $154,758 and average sale price $221,588 of South Carolina. Listing counts, 29453 home prices and home values in 29453 are sourced daily from listing and property data on realtor.com®, which is the most up-to-date and accurate aggregation of real estate listings in the industry and includes approximately 800 regional MLSs and is the official website of the National Association of Realtors®.
|Median Age
|Median Household Income