text:
Relationships. As my friend Sarah was once fond of saying, they're a complex cow. And modern day relationships are just the WORST, aren't they? All that equality and independence, women thinking they can do and be whatever they want without any consideration for their poor, hungry husbands. No wonder the divorce rates are so high.
But what if you could change all that? What if you could step out of your miserable, modern day life and go back to a time where things weren't so complicated? Where women weren't laden down with pesky 'dreams' and 'ambitions', because they knew that the path to true happiness was paved with recipe books and structured foundation garments?
Well my friend, you can! As Mandy and Gary Jones have shown, it's possible for anyone to take their boring, failing marriage and transplant it back to a time when men were men and women cooked for them. After nearly 30 years of marriage, the couple were determined to put some spark back into their dull domestic routine. So they did want any sensible couple would - they refurbished their home, built a 1950s style kitchen diner, and decided to travel sixty years back in time (figuratively speaking).
British couple Mandy and Gary Jones believe a 50s lifestyle will save their marriage. Photo: Henry Nicholls / SWNS.com
The smitten-once-again Mrs. Jones says she's never been happier. She sews her own retro style clothing, pins her hair up in vintage styles daily and makes sure that husband Gary always has a piping hot dinner waiting for him when he gets home from work (just as the Good Lord decreed). The attentive homemaker believes that their new lifestyle has saved their marriage, and thinks that all women should adopt a similar attitude in order to 'keep their man happy'.
And who wouldn't be happy with an on-call maid to darn their socks, rub their shoulders and cook for them every night, all while looking just as pretty as a gosh-darn picture? Let's face it, women weren't designed to run the world. That's more a man's thing. We're better at decorating it.
But never fear! It's easy to Keep Up With The Joneses. Because it's a simpler time, remember? Should you adopt their lifestyle, in addition to saving your sad, boring, angry, equal marriage, you'll have these lovely perks to look forward to:
1. The Mean Reds
No, I don't mean your period, silly! Women didn't menstruate back then because they had Barbie vaginas. Babies were made from the kisses of angels and snuck into the world from mummy's tummy button. No, in the 1950s, everyone was terrified of communism. With Senator Joe McCarthy stirring up paranoia about communist spies, everyone's nerves were just a LITTLE on edge. McCarthyism was alive and well, and that meant one thing - you were legitimately allowed to spy on your neighbours. Yes, no longer just the pursuit of nosy old women and Hitchcockian heroes, spying was de rigueur for anyone who wanted to be a True American Patriot. Of course, nothing's really changed there. But the point is, everyone was encouraged to be a little suspicious of their fellow citizens. And doesn't that make things a bit more exciting?
2. Don't cross the streams
In addition to a fear of communism, the really good thing about the 1950s was all the racism. It wasn't that white people were all that different from black folk - it's just that they were better. That's why they got all the good opportunities and social respect and the ongoing favour of the law, and maybe even a bonus unpaid domestic servant sent from that wonderful haven, the Cootamundra Girls Home. And Australia really was a much prettier place, with all those Indigenous flora and fauna adding a bit of flavour to the scenery. White people didn't make the rules. God did.
3. Birds do it, bees do it
But unfortunately, in the 1950s the only kinds of women who did it and enjoyed it were trampy harlots. Sex wasn't designed for women's pleasure but for procreation. Children give women purpose and something to do with all our free time. But let a woman like 'it' once and she's going to want to like it multiple times - maybe even with multiple partners. And that's how the Roman Empire fell. So in the 1950s, men knew how to take their wives in hand and pummel away at them for hours or maybe even just two minutes in a way that was guaranteed to make her hate it. Exciting sex was for mistresses, but you couldn't invite them to the company barbecue.
4. Clearer opportunities
Back in the 50s, there was no need for women to occupy themselves with any of that pesky book learning business. The only purpose higher education served was to hunt down a husband. Snag your man, and then set out on the fine task of feeding, clothing and loving him for all eternity. What could be more satisfying than that? Besides, you know what they say - behind every successful man, there's a woman looking on with gentle love in her eyes. Or maybe gin. It's hard to say. Which leads me to...
5. Alcoholism!
Yes, the 1950s were a good time for alcoholics. Back then, they went by the far more romantic title of 'dipsomaniac', or 'dipso' for short. "Never mind Doris," a smartly dressed man in line for yet another promotion might say. "She's just a bit of a dipso, that's all. Dipso Doris, that what we call her at home." The other men would chortle knowingly, and then begin to discuss the things their wives didn't understand, like politics or golf. And Doris would smile affably, if a little lopsidedly, as her fingers reached down ever so subtly to brush against the contours of the liquor flask she kept strapped to her thigh. It was almost empty, but she wasn't worried. There was more in the house. There would always be more.


text:
Review and change the name ratings you've made throughout the site
Create a private list of your favorite names or share it with the Nameberry community to flex your naming muscles
Manage all the name subscription emails you've set up
Change your email address and your password
- this week
We're excited that you have an opinion about the name Adeon. To rate names on Nameberry, please register for an account or log in to an existing account.
You will receive an email (no more than once per day) summarizing any new mentions of Adeon on Nameberry. Would you like to follow Adeon?
This name of a legendary Welsh prince could serve as a more original alternative to Adam or Aidan, though it does sound a tad chemical.
Aja Aja Aramis Ari Averell Averell Britania Danny Frey Hawthorn Ileana Loch Roanna Ruari Thorin Show me more names similar to Adeon Comment on Adeon
Please add to or correct the information provided by other members of the Nameberry community.
Exclusive Nameberry picks, direct to you.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
why people dont do ground pvp
View Single Post
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 17,864
# 2
Why I don't do Ground PvP...
1) The only reason I have 66k skill points in Ground skills is because I'm required to have 66k skill points in Ground skills. I have the minimum allowed.
2) I have 8 Aliens and a Reman. Each of the Aliens has a single Ground trait, since they could only select 8 of 9 as Space. The Reman has a single Ground trait (the Species trait).
3) I don't do Ground PvE (outside of leveling). As such, my Ground gear is crap because all you need is crap gear to do the Ground PvE as you're leveling.
So...minimum Ground skills allowed, minimum Ground traits allowed, and crap Ground gear...that's why I don't do Ground PvP.
Yep, Geko has been talking about a kit revamp. Won't make any difference to me, though...because again, I've got the min allowed Ground skills, the min allowed Ground traits, and crap Ground gear.
So okay, I don't want to "weaken" a toon by doing Ground...why not just take one of the Universal Slots that is sitting there as a Foundry toon doing nothing and roll a Ground guy?
The reason I didn't buy STO after the beta was because of Ground. Around a year later, when I got an email asking me to check out where STO was...I couldn't remember why I wasn't playing STO. I had been following the development from back when Perpetual had the license. I downloaded and installed the game for the free trial thing, created the toon, jumped once, and uninstalled the game. I remembered why I wasn't playing STO.
Outside of training BOFFs or switching ships, I'm not going to Ground. I'd rather pop a freighter or look for somebody that popped a freighter than go to Ground. Luckily enough, there are obviously enough people that feel the same because there are so many getting popped above Sol, Qo'noS, and even New Romulus.
Don't get me wrong, the artists, environmental guys, etc, etc, etc...have done an awesome job with the look of Ground. It came a long way with LoR...but it is still Ground. It's still the same goofy animations, the same clipping on costumes, etc, etc, etc...
For the folks not bothered by all those things, though, I do hope Geko gets somewhere with the kit revamp and it improves things for those folks that enjoy or want to enjoy Ground...
Willard the Rat, Klingon, Sci (60), U.S.S. Tong Vey, Geneva Command Battlecruiser (FT6), Inner Circle
Meena, Ferasan, Tac (56), I.K.S. vagh SuD bas, B'rel Retrofit Bird-of-Prey (T5U), Ho'ragh
[WIP] No-Fleet, T5U B'rel Retrofit Build


text:
Notsuoh Wins Injury Suit
Jury rejects $12 million claim
By John Nova Lomax
The $12,000,000 and 47 cent personal injury lawsuit against Jim Pirtle, Melissa Bosch and their Notsuoh bar is over, and the bar owners won't have to pay a dime.
After several days of testimony, jurors found that attorney Donna Roth's version of events — that Pirtle was responsible for grievous injuries sustained by her client while on the premises of Pirtle's bar — was not credible.
Nathan Fischer, Roth's client, was terribly injured after either falling, jumping or getting pushed off the roof or out of an open window on one of Notsuoh's upper floors in the wee hours of a February 2009 morning. There were no witnesses, and Fischer has never been able to say what happened — he has no recollection of the event. His blood alcohol level was more than three times the legal limit, and while it was ruled inadmissible as evidence, the jury also heard that he had cocaine and marijuana in his system as well.
"They had no case at all," said a juror who requested anonymity. "It was a travesty that they brought this suit. Nobody should have to go through this."
Pirtle was relieved that his ordeal was over, but shaken by the testimony. "Basically I spent three straight days listening to a bunch of people talk about what a scumbag I am," he says. "His attorney really focused on what a dick I am. I wouldn't wish this on anyone."
"Either [Roth] was naive, or she thought we were stupid," says the juror. "Either she really believed her story or she thought we would, and what she said happened was not possible."
The juror says that case hinged on Fisher falling out of a glassless second- or third-floor window, and that as the facts were presented, those scenarios simply weren't possible.
Someone was seated near the second-floor window and saw nothing. Neither did other people nearby. As for the third-floor window, the jury determined that Fischer was too big to simply fall out of it. The juror thinks it more likely that Fischer jumped, as he was found about ten feet from the building.
The juror believed that Roth attempted to stress the injuries her client has endured — he suffered a brain injury and is now permanently incapacitated — over the facts of how he got them. He believed that she wanted their sympathy for her client to trump their logical reasoning.
The jury didn't buy it.
What's more, a basis of the suit posits that "nothing Fischer did or failed to do in any way contributed to cause the occurrence in question," as if guzzling enough hooch to intoxicate a submarine full of Russian sailors was in no way his own responsibility.
Again, the jury didn't buy it.
Everybody feels bad for Fischer, but what happened to him was not Pirtle's fault, the jury determined. And now Pirtle's ordeal is over.
"I have literally just been through one of the worst weeks in my life," Pirtle declared last week on Facebook. "I was sued for 12 million dollars and 47 cents... I was on trial all week... I wore a suit four days in a row... a personal record... I won and have my life back."
Video Belies HPD's Tale, Attorney Says
By Craig Malisow
Security camera footage taken during a raid at the Treasures strip club shows a Houston Police Department officer shoving gay activist Ray Hill in the chest before other officers surround the 71-year-old, handcuff him and escort him from the premises.
The video of the December 8 incident, which Hill showed to Hair Balls, does not align with court papers claiming that Hill pushed the officer, resulting in Hill's misdemeanor charge of interfering with the duties of a public servant.
Hill's attorney, Stanley Schneider, said he gave a copy of the video to the Harris County District Attorney's Office Monday.
"What the three officers describe in their offense report clearly did not occur on the video," Schneider said.
Hill, who had for decades fought against police harassment of gays and gay clubs and who now brings that same zeal toward, um, titty bars, said he had gone to Treasures the night of December 8 after he received a call about the raid.
The video (which doesn't have sound) shows Hill, who has a prosthetic leg, talking to, or attempting to talk to, an officer holding court in Treasures' foyer, as other officers, patrons and dancers walk in and out of view. Hill's hands are in his pockets, and after about 16 seconds, the officer shoves Hill toward a wall, knocking him off balance. As two other officers swoop in, Hill puts his palm against the chest of one of the officers — a move Hill says he made because he was knocked off balance and afraid he'd fall down.
To Hair Balls, it looks like another one of those instances where someone forgot to remind police officers that cameras are ubiquitous, and it's not like the halcyon days when you could gaffle someone and not wind up on YouTube. Not that this incident rivals the Chad Holley or Patti LaBelle fiascos, but the point is sort of the same.


text:
Please enter your information below.
* indicates a required field.
First Name *
Last Name *
Street Address *
City *
State *
Zip Code *
Phone Number *
Email address *
Who will this party be for?
Who is this party for? *
Birthday age *
Select one boy girl *
Next Page ->
Estimated Number of Children in your party
Estimated Number of Adults who will be Bowling
Estimated Number of Adults who will NOT be Bowling
Please enter the preferred days and times you would like to have your party.
Please Note: Not all days and times are available. Parties are booked on a first come, first serve basis.
Preferred Day #1 ... *
Preferred Time 1 *
Preferred Day #2 ...
Preferred Time 2
Once your Birthday party inquiry has been submitted, someone will be in contact with you within 72 hours to assist with booking the party. You may also book your party over the phone at (734) 522-4515 during our normal business hours.
PLEASE NOTE: this submission does not guarantee the requested day or timeslot. Birthday parties are booked based on availability and are scheduled on a first-come, first-serve basis. We will, however, try to accomodate your request to the best of our abilities.
Book a party for your childs birthday or for a fundraiser, fun for all!
Read More...
Tournaments, Leagues Events and more. Check out our calendar!
Pro-AM now has a store inside Woodland for your convenience.


text:
PARKING DILEMMA: Sell 216 Connecticut St., residents sayJune 11, 2014Is a proposed Mound House off-site parking lot a commercial intrusion? Neighborhood residents of a town-owned empty parcel off of Connecticut Street are not warming up to the idea of a parking lot...... No comments posted for this article.
Post a Comment |


text:
Santa Maria RV Park
Phone: (228) 522-3009
Visit Campground Website
Sites: 142
Recent Rate: $28 1/2013
Latitude: 30.426951
Longitude: -88.62645
These reviews are the opinion of an RVParkReviews' member and not the views of RVParkReviews.com
Date of Stay: January, 2013 - $28.00
Poorly maintain, dirty. Staff have poor attitude. We stayed for 6 months due to hospital needs and had to request our lawn to be mowed. Rules not enforced. Police called a number of times due to fighting and drunkenness by construction workers that live there. Website mis-leading, pond completely overgrown with weeds, no boat ramp, and alligators present at times. We camped at Santa Maria RV Park in a Fifth Wheel.
Date of Stay: February, 2012 - $28.00
Park is not as advertised. There is one area, next to the road, with level pull-thru sites, basically a gravel parking lot. The rest of the park is dirt and nowhere near level sites. The pool was not open, and did not look like anything I would use. There is only one, not "pools" as advertised. The "fitness room" is a storeroom with 3 machines which do not work. One thing the park does have, which the ad doesn't mention, is a 4-wheeler track around the pond which you have to listen to 8 hours a day. There are no rules concerning pets, so dogs are penned/tied outside and no one picks up after them. Vehicles speed through park. Very disappointing. We camped at Santa Maria RV Park in a Fifth Wheel.
UndoPre-Register below to access free and enhanced features coming in the near future.
Access to marketing tools, ability respond to reviews and monitor performance as well as expanded listings.
More Information about our Campground Owner Management and its enhancements are coming very soon. Features subject to change.


text:
Regis College congratulates Professor John Dadosky on the release of his newest book, The Eclipse and Recovery of Beauty: A Lonergan Approach. The book has been published by the University of Toronto Press.
"Beauty saves the world." This phrase from Dostoevsky's The Idiot contains an extremely important albeit neglected diagnosis and prescription for our contemporary world - the loss of beauty and its recovery. Taking the Swiss theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar as a lead, one can conclude that such a loss leads to a world riddled with skepticism, moral and aesthetic relativism, a fragmentation of knowledge splintered into specialized disciplines, conflicting religious worldviews and the escalating ecological crises. In 9 chapters the book outlines the theoretical context for the loss of beauty in the West in Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's negative aesthetics and begins to offer a multi-fold argument for its recovery in aesthetic experience, the intelligibility of beauty, aesthetic judgments, the philosophy of art and the contemplation of beauty in nature and beyond.
For ordering and more information, please visit: http://www.utppublishing.com/The-Eclipse-and-Recovery-of-Beauty-A-Lonergan-Approach.html
Regis College is the Jesuit School of Theology at the University of Toronto and a Founding Member of the Toronto School of Theology.
Members of the public interested in theological education are invited to attend an open house in October and March each year.


text:
Zetterberg: Weber targeted head with 'dirty' shot
Detroit forward Henrik Zetterberg returned to practice today, but was still clearly bothered by the blow to the head he took at the hands of Predators defenseman Shea Weber at the end of Wednesday night's game. The NHL chose not to suspend Weber for stuffing Zetterberg's head into the glass, fining him $2,500 instead. "It […]
Posted in League News, Team News
Tagged henrik zetterberg, Mike Babcock, Shea Weber, Tomas Holmstrom
Comments Off


text:
User talk:Jcb
archive May 2005 - March 2011 - April 2011 - June 2011 - July 2011 - September 2011 - October 2011 - December 2012 - January 2013 - December 2013 - January 2014 - February 2014 - April 2014
For any questions about OTRS permissions, please visit the OTRS/Noticeboard
- 1 A barnstar for you!
- 2 About "Smite_generic_logo.jpg" (Third time is the charm)
- 3 Sobre File:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone logo.png
- 4 Biografía Carlos Antonio Cifuentes. CC-BY-SA-3.0 y GFDL
- 5 File:Seal of the Southern Cherokee Nation of Kentucky, Inc.png
- 7 Commons:Deletion requests/All pictures uploaded by User:Riesending-bergwachtfotos
- 8 File:Scoundrel 4.jpg
- 9 Mass Delete these Photos
- 10 Bedeutende Luftfoto für die Architektur - File:Orphanage-1a.Aldo van Eyck.jpg
- 11 Question
- 12 Jean-Yves Lechevallier
- 13 File:Barbage à l'Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon le 10 juin 2014 (photo La Barbe à Lyon).jpg
- 14 File:La Barbe université de la gastronomie à Tours - Rencontres François Rabelais 09 11 2013.jpg
- 15 Commons:Deletion requests/File:2012 07 05 Yael Abecassis.JPG
- 16 File:Escudo de Chipiona.svg
- 17 File:Bruno Choel.jpg
- 18 File:Passage 907 - Henrijean.jpg
- 19 File:Marco Aarnink.jpg
- 20 File:EricVerberne.jpg
- 21 File:Julio Ríos Gallego 2014.JPG
- 22 Permisos OTRS (Lorenzo Peirano (1), Lorenzo Peirano (2) y Poemas de Lorenzo Peirano (2014))
- 23 File:Solidus Tiberius Petasius.jpg
- 24 Your deletion of Gabor B. Racz photo
- 25 images illustrant l'article français La Barbe
- 26 File:Motherwell FC logo.png
- 27 OTRS tickets
- 28 File:Photo of Joe McKinney by Lili Forberg.jpg
- 29 Probelm with file
- 30 Deletion of ASV files which did have OTRS permission
- 31 atoomijsbrekers
- 32 File:Aguará Rugby Club.jpg
- 33 FredD
- 34 Fichier supprimé de la page Yves Gomy
- 35 Picture that I uploaded to Commons
- 36 Some baklava for you!
- 37 File:David_Gruber2.jpg
- 38 File:David Clarke 1.png
- 39 File:Friedhof Lilienthalstraße, Plan.jpg
- 40 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Passagierin_%28Oper%29
- 41 Reː Lorenzo Enrique Peirano (1939 - Chile).
- 42 Your revdel on Trijnstel's talk page
- 43 OTRS image problem
- 44 Copyright status: File:St. Bernardus Prior 8.jpg
- 45 Deletion of KevinMichaelSmitz.jpg
- 46 Picture of Pierre Karl Péladeau
- 47 Yeonmi Park
- 48 File:Coppauefa.png
- 49 File:Anne Mulder.jpg
- 50 File:RG wiki.jpg
- 51 fichier Sem-ayache-galmiche-201406032.jpg
- 52 Circus Maximus
- 53 Upload GILL, James: "Grace Kelly in Sun (2013)"
- 54 No revenge
- 55 ¿Difficulties with volunteering OTRS?
- 56 [Ticket#2014121310011085]
- 57 Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_deleted_by_Jcb
- 58 ScottPageAMLORTour.jpg
- 59 Question about a picture I uploaded
- 60 Permiso enviado el 22 de enero de 2015
- 61 Your assistance please...
- 62 A brownie for you!
- 63 Please help close an old DN
A barnstar for you![edit]
The Special Barnstar | |
The Special Barnstar is awarded to a user as a gesture of appreciation when there is no other barnstar which would be appropriate.
Thank you for all your hard work! -- Steinsplitter (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2014 (UTC) |
About "Smite_generic_logo.jpg" (Third time is the charm)[edit]
I came to check if there was any news on the matter, since I haven't got a single message from anyone at all, but I noticed something: The description and reasons of why the file was deleted was changed to "Copyright violation: http://www.parliamodivideogiochi.it/2014/01/14/pdv/rubriche/att/2014-giochi-in-uscita/".
There is a "small" problem with this: I made that particular version of the file, and I did Not upload it to that website.
I still have the original file on my pc (seems like my paranoia is starting to pay off), stating that it was last modified on December 15, 2013.
I'm trully indignated by this. I've been patient, I've put a good amount of time and effort in all this, only to end but being branded a generic kid uploading stuff they downloaded from somewhere.--Malvodion (talk) 09:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Sobre File:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone logo.png[edit]
Hola, Jcb. Hace unos meses subí varios archivos a Wikimedia Commons que fueron borrados, ya que los subí con la licencia incorrecta. Por ejemplo, vos borraste File:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone logo.png. La pregunta es: ¿cómo podría volver a subir esos archivos pero con una licencia diferente?, ya que Commons no me deja. De antemano, gracias. Facu Carneiro (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- A través de Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests - Jcb (talk) 11:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Biografía Carlos Antonio Cifuentes. CC-BY-SA-3.0 y GFDL[edit]
Hola Jcb, gusto de saludarle. Puede usted ayudarme con este permiso, por favor. Un Saludo.--Deucaleon (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Seal of the Southern Cherokee Nation of Kentucky, Inc.png[edit]
You deleted this file as some type of copyright infringement. I am on the National Council of the Southern Cherokee Nation of Kentucky and that seal you deleted is ours to post on Wiki Commons as we see fit. Please restore the seal to Wikimedia Commons and the Southern Cherokee Nation of Kentucky Wiki article. Wado.
Hi Johann, his wife shots the photo, sorry but I seem obvious that the camera is owner of the man and the woman grants the permissions and the free license for use it. They are newbies, they don't know our policies Ezarateesteban 09:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- I understand they are newbies, that's why we have to give explanations and ask questions. We are in place to guide them through policies, not to help them breaking policies. Jcb (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/All pictures uploaded by User:Riesending-bergwachtfotos[edit]
There is still ongoing debate on your decision, you may confirm what I wrote knowing the OTRS-Mails. Thanks -Riesending-bergwachtfotos (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have put the discussion on my watch list. I will keep an eye on it. Jcb (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Scoundrel 4.jpg[edit]
Hola Jcb. He visto que has eliminado File:Scoundrel 4.jpg por violación de copyright. La página que mencionas o sea esta, así como su contenido, es publicada bajo la licencia CC-BY-SA. Podrías por favor verificar y avisarme si es posible restaurar el archivo. Un saludo, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 18:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC).
- Verificado y restaurado. Jcb (talk) 20:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Dank u! Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 22:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC).
Sorry, but I disagree. Wikia content could be release with that licence, but pictures aren't. Just notice than, in the same link, they shows "Pirates of the Caribean" logo. That is not content with free licence. As two users explained me on february, Wikia got a global licence, but doesn`t mean all content is free. See the picture: low quality, probably screenshot. Description says: "One of "Scoundrel of the Seas" flags from POTCO game". In my opinion has no chance to be "free content". Cheers. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- We can use the Precautionary principle to delete it again... sorry. Is not possible to know that the image is correctly uploaded on Wikia. Licence is right, but... Regards, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 16:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC).
Mass Delete these Photos[edit]
Dear Admin Jcb,
Can you file a mass DR on these photos? They are copyrighted. The uploader states that these sculptures were carved by Henri Bouchard but he died in 1960 in France and Commons has a template not to upload such images. Please help. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- When I came back from a long wikibreak last year, I decided to try not to involve myself in Freedom of Panorama related issues, to keep myself out of trouble. I still think that was a good decision. E.g. User:Jameslwoodward will be able to advice you in this case. Jcb (talk) 10:50, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- From time to time I, too, have tried staying out of FOP cases -- your decision is a good one.
- I agree with Leoboudv that these are all derivative works and should be deleted. I suggest you use Visual File Change to put the DRs on them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Bedeutende Luftfoto für die Architektur - File:Orphanage-1a.Aldo van Eyck.jpg[edit]
Hi Jcb, am 11.11.2013 haben Sie geschrieben: "Ich kann das Bild wieder setzen, wenn wir eine gültige Genehmigung durch OTRS erhalten." - Der Copyrightbesitzer "Aviodrome Collectiebeheer in Lelystad" hat am 3.6.2014 das schriftliche Copyright an Commons geschickt. Commons hat es wie folgt registriert:
Ticket#: 2014 0603 1000 5416 und Ticket#: 2014 0603 1000 5425
Darf ich Sie freundlich fragen, die Luftfoto wieder zu setzen, resp. wieder zu aktivieren. Für Ihre Mühe zum voraus besten Dank. User:Leuk2 User talk:Leuk2 13:15, 22. Juni 2014 (UTC)
- Das Ticket ist in unserer Warteschlange. Tickets werden in der Reihenfolge des Eingangs bearbeitet. Jcb (talk) 11:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Das Copyright von 4 Zeichnungen (Diagoon 1.Herman Hertzberger.jpg) wurde am 3.6.2014 an Permissions geschickt. Nach einem Tag, am 4.6.2014, waren die Zeichnungen aktiviert! User:Leuk2 14:30, 22. Juni 2014 (UTC)
- Ich verstehe nicht, warum Sie ein DE-1 Benutzer belästigen, um die Priorität auf Ihre DE Ticket zu bekommen. Bitte warten in Geduld. Jcb (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Im deutschsprachigen Raum hat man einen guten Vorbildtext für das Copyright von andern Autoren. Leuk2 16:30, 22. Juni 2014 (UTC)
- File:Orphanage-1a.Aldo van Eyck.jpg aus Amsterdam ist aktiviert durch den deutschen Benutzer Krd. Leuk2 12:00, 8. Juli 2014 (UTC)
First, I don't know what is the relationship between OTRS and license reviewer , there is no mistakes in the files I reviewed from (Flickr , Picasa .. etc) and there is no reason to revoke this right from me! Second, You treat me as "stupid" without any respect ! I know it is a mistake, but it ordinary not basic as you said! because it came from (like official) email (not free email) and include right license and I search it in google and tineye and didn't find another website host it, there is no there is no suspicious thing , so I add a ticket. I admit (and do not deny) that is a mistake, but I think you should not rush in harsh judgments , specially it first time for me and I join the team in less than one month! and this mistake is 1% of all permissions I made, you check my last approved tickets yourself, and found it is right, I'm also not a junior or newcomer, I'm also administrator in wikipedia and active at Wikimedia/Wikipedia from 2009 so what experiences you talk about , and how can I gain experiences (as you said) and you behead my head from first mistake! --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 02:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- About half of your permissions were bad. I did not (yet) check your reviewer activity, but you obviously do not have sufficient knowledge of copyright to have additional rights. People need to trust review-templates. They cannot if we give the rights to unexperienced people. Jcb (talk) 06:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- How could you say «About half of your permissions were bad» then say «I did not (yet) check your reviewer activity» !!! are you serious ?! are you revoke the right before check my permissions?!!
- Unfortunately, all you calculations is not right, because you only reverted 4 files from 27 files I have reviewed:
- File:Gary Marks.jpg right OTRS ticket you checked it yourself.
- File:Monica Wehby.jpg came from right place, just need photographer name only !
- deleted file
- File:Sandra Maas1.jpg not depicted person, it came from real person with real name and email , she use a right licenses with perfect template, but we discover (including you) that she is not the real Author (nobody can sure 100% before) , neither you nor anyone can detect the right author because there is no sources in google or tinyeye and there is nothing is suspicious .
- I know that I should be more careful ,but I didn't make willful violation or ignore the guidelines.
- If you think that I'm inexperienced , this is your «personal point of view» only, there are an administrator in Meta accept my OTRS volunteering request, and in commons: there are two administrators support me in the request and the third neutral user give me the right ! you should respect the opinions of others, Wikimedia Commons is not yours and the administrative permissions are not depend on personal opinion, so please reconsider it , Because your decision is hasty and too rough --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 11:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think you don't get the point yet. Do you e.g. clearly understand the English word 'depicted'? You may wish to reconsider your Babel information, EN-2 may be more in line with your real knowledge of English. Jcb (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- OK, let's talk about my English skills! what else? I think if someone made a mistake or doesn't know , the other one must assume a good faith and discuss it with him. Are you did? No, you took your decision immediately and treat me with contempt since a first time. --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 00:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Administrators are allowed to assign or remove those rights at their own discretion. If a user turns out not to be capable, rights may be removed immediately. Your comments afterward clearly confirmed (not even taking into account the poor English) that you are too unfamiliar at the moment with copyright to have reviewer rights. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- OK, let's talk about my English skills! what else? I think if someone made a mistake or doesn't know , the other one must assume a good faith and discuss it with him. Are you did? No, you took your decision immediately and treat me with contempt since a first time. --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 00:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think you don't get the point yet. Do you e.g. clearly understand the English word 'depicted'? You may wish to reconsider your Babel information, EN-2 may be more in line with your real knowledge of English. Jcb (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Jean-Yves Lechevallier[edit]
Hello Jcb, in the series of pictures uploaded by User:DDupard concerning artworks of Jean-Yves Lechevallier, link to ticket : https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2014061110010654 , the picture File:Polypores Fountain. Jean Yves Lechevallier.jpg has not yet that ticket, probably the ticked discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cristaux.jpg crossed the upload of this latest image. User:DDupard is a beginner. Does the ticket account for this picture or do DDupard and the artist have to repeat the procedure for another ticket? Greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- The permission is generic and we also received a new message to the ticket to notify us that new files were added. I have marked them as confirmed. Jcb (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Barbage à l'Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon le 10 juin 2014 (photo La Barbe à Lyon).jpg[edit]
Dear Jcb, I have looked for the author and found her three days ago. The author of this photo is Laura Tangre, she is a professionnal photographer she has sent the evidence of permission and licence GFDL / Cc-by-sa to "firstname.lastname@example.com " (on July 15th) And I m going to write her name under the photo (elle "donne son autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence GFDL / Cc-by-sa"
- I hope nothing is missing now. If something is missing, please tell me.
- Best regards --Mocaya (talk) 08:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the file is ok now, the author has sent her permission on july. Thanks for your attention.--Mocaya (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
File:La Barbe université de la gastronomie à Tours - Rencontres François Rabelais 09 11 2013.jpg[edit]
Message to User :Jcb Dear Jcb, I have looked for the author and found her three days ago. The author does not want to see her name on Wikipédia but I sent sent the evidence of permission to "firstname.lastname@example.com "
- I hope nothing is missing now. If something is missing, please tell me.
- Best regards --Mocaya (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the file is ok now, the author has sent her permission on july. Thanks for your attention.--Mocaya (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. I've been absent for a while this summer, but I have started to have a look at the backlogs again. Jcb (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:2012 07 05 Yael Abecassis.JPG[edit]
Hi Jcb, I was very surprized to see that you closed the deletion request 1 hour and 40 minutes after I opened the request, with the closing comment: " nominated for the same reason three months ago and kept. No valid deletion reason. Commons is not censored." Since the first request was closed with "no reason given", and I gave a valid reason according with the policy of Wikimedia founation Resolution:Media about living people the reason of your closing is not correct. I ask you to reopen the deletion request and give the other users in Commons the chance to express their opinion. Thanks Hanay (talk) 04:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- I read that resolution and it doesn't give any reason for this particular case. We cannot delete pictures with a valid license just because the subject or her agent doesn't like it. I don't know how experienced you are at OTRS, but requests like this come in on a daily base and much colleagues just explain to the subject that their permission is not needed for a picture taken in a public place. Imagine what would happen if we would fulfil these requests. The stream of censorship requests just because e.g. someones hair is in the wrong direction would become unmanagable. I cannot read your Hebrew answer, but please explain to her agent that her permission is not needed for a picture depicting her in a public place and that we don't do courtesy deletions if there is no apparent reason. There is nothing wrong with this picture. Jcb (talk) 10:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Escudo de Chipiona.svg[edit]
You tagged this file missing permission or author and I tried to help a colleague heraldist who may be absent for some time. As far as I can see both details are given like with plenty (maybe +100) coats of arms this user has drawn and uploaded with the identical file details. What is specifically wrong with this file, pls? -- Maxxl² - talk 10:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I've seen this thread only yet, I've converted this completely arbitrarily tagging to a regular DR, because Jcb is an admin and has reinserted the SD. → User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 12:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Bruno Choel.jpg[edit]
Hi, I noticed you deleted File:Bruno Choël.png. Another file, with a different picture but the same quality has been uploaded by the same user: File:Bruno Choel.jpg. If you see any possible copyright violation here too, please do act. Elfix 13:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have started a DR. (Later today I will be leaving for a few weeks, this edit may be my last edit before 17 August) - Jcb (talk) 16:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Passage 907 - Henrijean.jpg[edit]
Hello. I noticed you deleted "Passage 907 - Henrijean.jpg" & "Passage 504.jpg" whereas I've asked a special authorisation by email at email@example.com. I work with the author and he allows the publication of the pictures under a cc-by-sa-3.0 licence. It has already been done with the following files : - Adam - Henrijean.jpg - Autoportrait- Henrijean.jpg - Curiculum Vitae - Henrijean.jpg - Le temps d'une seconde - Heanrijean.jpg How should I proceed to have the same kind of authorisation for the two more recent works ? Thank you. Best regards. --Nimbus08 (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Although it may take a while before you get an answer, this should be dealt with by email. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Marco Aarnink.jpg[edit]
File:Marco Aarnink.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
JurgenNL (talk) 09:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
File:EricVerberne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
JurgenNL (talk) 16:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Julio Ríos Gallego 2014.JPG[edit]
Hi. I spoke to someone about this today at Wikimania, and I hope you don't mind me being bold but I have reverted the authorship to as originally stated - if nothing else we can work on the basis that the author should be attributed as they wish, and there's nothing to stop someone wishing to be attributed as someone else. I have started a discussion on this general topic at Commons:Village_pump#Authorship_for_images_where_subject_is_not_the_photographer_but_is_the_person_who_sets_things_up, which you may want to join in once you get back from your holiday (?). -mattbuck (Talk) 22:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- @mattbuck, in this case it is not true that the photographer stated that she wants to be named as her husband. The depicted person didn't state such a thing either. Only the uploader claims such a thing, but in this case she (Marinna) is clearly the one to blame, because she caused the initial confusion by sending standard texts to several people in which those people claim to be the author and/or copyright holder of a picture depicting them. Jcb (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't doubt there's confusion, but I think we can just let this one slide. The uploader's happy, the subject/author are allegedly happy, it's all gone away. There are certainly issues with communicating in non-native languages, I think it can be chalked up to that. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Permisos OTRS (Lorenzo Peirano (1), Lorenzo Peirano (2) y Poemas de Lorenzo Peirano (2014))[edit]
Hola Jcb. Puede usted ayudarme con este, este y este archivo. De antemano, muchas gracias. Saludos.--Deucaleon (talk) 21:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Solidus Tiberius Petasius.jpg[edit]
Restored with proper license. --SJuergen (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Your deletion of Gabor B. Racz photo[edit]
I just discovered that you removed File:Dr. Gabor B. Racz.jpg citing the reason No OTRS permission for 30 days. On June 24, 2014, written permission was sent under the license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 to permissions-en on June 24, 2014. Permission was sent for all the photos. Was there something else I had to do? The article was nominated for GA status, and a reviewer has contacted me, so please advise at your earliest possible convenience. Thank you in advance.... Atsme☯Consult 04:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- I see you also sent an email today, which is already responded by a colleague. Jcb (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
images illustrant l'article français La Barbe[edit]
Bonjour, I need help, Green Giant a laissé un message incompréhensible menaçant de supprimer toutes les photos illustrant l'article français LA BARBE. (I have received a message by Green Giant that I do not understand at all, because the permissions have already benne sent by the authors and the tickets delivered. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mocaya#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7C1.3DFile:Remise_du_diplome_de_Barbe_d.27or_-_La_Barbe_Toulouse_groupe_d.27action_f.C3.A9ministe.jpg.7Cbase.3DImage_permission.2Fheading.7D.7D
Les permissions ont pourtant déjà été envoyées par les auteurs . Et les numéros de ticket ont ensuite été délivrés. Je ne comprends pas du tout, pouvez-vous venir à mon secours ? : thanks, regards cordialement, Mocaya --Mocaya (talk) 09:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Please ignore the Green Giant message. I have forwarded an email message to you with the open question. Jcb (talk) 11:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the file is ok now, the last author Jean Adoua(for the yellow photo in Toulouse is back from holidays and has sent his permission . Thanks for your attention.--Mocaya (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Motherwell FC logo.png[edit]
Hoi Jcb, de release van deze afbeelding is een beetje op het randje. Denk je dat je nog even met die club in contact kan treden om het echt duidelijk te krijgen? Op irc hadden mensen het nu over verwijdering en dat zou natuurlijk zonde zijn. Multichill (talk) 13:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Op het randje misschien, hoewel in ieder geval strict genomen voldoende. Ik stel voor dat we ons eerst op echte problemen richten, op lekken als Hanay, die stug door blijven gaan PermissionOTRS te plakken op afbeeldingen waarvan wij niet eens weten wie de auteur is. Die het voldoende vinden dat een of andere "groep" blijkbaar een fototoestel kan bedienen, of die denken dat 'auteur' hetzelfde is als 'afgebeelde persoon'. Als die mensen de hand boven het hoofd wordt gehouden, zoals hier en hier, dan denk ik dat het weinig zin heeft om ons bezig te gaan houden met oude tickets die strict genomen wel correct zijn, maar niet helemaal optimaal. Jcb (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Don't shoot the messenger. Bijvoorbeeld user:Natuur12 wilde het al gaan nomineren voor verwijdering. Multichill (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ehhh, hou mijn offwiki gebrabbel er even buiten wil je. Ik was helemaal niks van plan. Natuur12 (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry Natuur12, dan heb ik dat verkeerd begrepen. Mijn excuses. Multichill (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ehhh, hou mijn offwiki gebrabbel er even buiten wil je. Ik was helemaal niks van plan. Natuur12 (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Don't shoot the messenger. Bijvoorbeeld user:Natuur12 wilde het al gaan nomineren voor verwijdering. Multichill (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
OTRS tickets[edit]
Please, it doesn't seem like you read Hebrew, Your deletion requests aren't looking in good faith and wasting my time restoring files that were deleted. I request you to ask me if you have concerns regarding a ticket. Thanks and have a nice day. matanya • talk 09:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi :), Can you please stop opening del request on valid OTRS tickets. If you have a personal problem with someone you should speak with this person and not starting DR on files with valid OTRS tickets. Have a nice day. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Photo of Joe McKinney by Lili Forberg.jpg[edit]
Jcb, I noticed you just changed the author of File:Photo of Joe McKinney by Lili Forberg.jpg from Lili Forberg to Maura Lanahan, but didn't change the description which says it is by Lili Forberg and links to Lili Forberg's web site (these details apparently all originated with the original uploader). IMDB has a copy of the photo as well, and they credit it as "Photo by Lili Forberg." Why did you change the identify of the author? Is there a reason you didn't also change the description and the file name, if Lili Forberg is not the correct author? —RP88 (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oops, I rechecked it. Ticket contains two pictures and two permissions. Lili Forberg is correct for this one. Jcb (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, are you also going to undo your file move? —RP88 (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Do you wish me to move it back? It's unusual (but not forbidden) to have the author's name in the file name. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't really care, either name is fine with me. I just asked I because I only relatively recently got the "file mover" right, am probably over-conscious of the rules for file renaming at Commons:File renaming, and thus still keeping an eye out for examples to inform me about how Commons renames occur in practice. —RP88 (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Do you wish me to move it back? It's unusual (but not forbidden) to have the author's name in the file name. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, are you also going to undo your file move? —RP88 (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Probelm with file[edit]
Hi Jcb, i do need your help, can i send you mail? FrankCreist (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- You can mail us at info-commonswikimedia.org . If you want me to answer it, you may place 'for Jcb' in the subject. Jcb (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of ASV files which did have OTRS permission[edit]
You just deleted some files whose names all started with "ASV" (see list below), with the reason "No OTRS permission for 30 days".
However, the OTRS permission email was sent by the photographer concerned on 1 August (copy below).
I am the person who uploaded the photos, because the photographer prefers not to do that himself, and I have never used the OTRS system before so I am not sure where to proceed with this. What is the problem that caused the files to be deleted, and what can I do to fix it? --Gronk Oz (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Copy of OTRS Permission email[edit]
From: Perry Vlahos [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.com] Sent: Friday, 1 August 2014 17:17 To: 'firstname.lastname@example.com' Subject: Images I hereby affirm that I, Perry Vlahos, am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following photographs: · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASV Setting up telescopes at Leon Mow Dark Sky Site.jpg · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Observing at the VicSouth Desert Spring Star Party.jpg · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASV Setting up for observing at VicSouth Star Party.jpg · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASV John Dobson addressing the Astronomical Society of Victoria.jpg · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASV Preparing the 25-inch telescope for the Star-Be-Cue.jpg · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASV Star Party 05 PV Talk Cropped.jpg · https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASV Santa Claus solar observing at Star-Be-Cue.jpg I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0". I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Perry Vlahos [mailto:email@example.com] Creator and sole copyright owner of these works. 1st August 2014
- As far as I can see, I only deleted files that were not mentioned in the ticket and I kept all files that were mentioned in the ticket. Which file you are talking about? Jcb (talk) 11:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, Jcb. The files of concern are two which are used in the ASV's article:
- ASV John Dobson addressing the Astronomical Society of Victoria.jpg
- ASV Observing at the VicSouth Desert Spring Star Party.jpg
- The first file seems to be covered by the authorization; what did I miss?
- I do notice that the second file had a slightly different name: the authorization note omitted the prefix "ASV". So if I reload that under the changed name, can I use the existing authorization note, or will I need a new one? --Gronk Oz (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I seem to have overlooked the first one. I have restored that file. For the second file, please ask the photographer to send us a message in which he states that the permission also applies to that file. If he refers to OTRS ticket number 2014080110006157, we will easily connect it to this case. Jcb (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, Jcb. The files of concern are two which are used in the ASV's article:
hoi jcb! kijk eens ik heb een filmpje gemaakt over atoomijsbrekers!! ik hoop dat je het leuk vind
File:Aguará Rugby Club.jpg[edit]
Hi Jcbǃ File:Aguará Rugby Club.jpg. The president of the Aguara Rugby Club already sent you the email communication granting permission. Thank You.
- Ok. It may take some time before it gets handled, we have quite a backlog at OTRS. Jcb (talk) 17:35, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Dag Johan. De files van genaamde gebruiker zitten al maanden in de pijplijn en als niet-OTRS lid lijkt dit een probleemgeval dat niet opgelost raakt. De enige boodschap die overkomt is die van : "er zijn mails aangekomen maar ze zijn niet helemaal in orde". Dat betekent voor een gewone gebruiker : Volg de regels en verwijder die bestanden. Ze kunnen nog altijd hersteld worden als ze achteraf bonafide blijken te zijn. Blijkbaar kunnen sommigen met veel meer wegkomen dan anderen...
Daarenboven is hij nogal hardleers. Ik (en anderen) hebben al herhaaldelijk de categorie structuur uitgelegd (en aangepast) voor het catalogeren van biologische soorten. Ook dat levert niets of weinig op. Hij klaagt enkel dat dat te veel werk is. De uitdrukking Wat baten kaars en bril als den uil niet zienen wil is hier zeer van toepassing. Mvg, Biopics 10:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Hi Johan. I've blocked this user for a short time (2 weeks) due to continued disruption such as this violation of your warning, and further hostility toward FredD and others on his (Biopics's) talk, for which I've also removed talk access. INeverCry 10:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- @INeverCry, thanks! - @Biopics, zoals je op mijn gebruikerspagina hebt kunnen zien, heb ik wel toegang tot OTRS. Ik heb de toestemmingen zien langskomen. Het gaat om generieke vrijgaven van grote hoeveelheden afbeeldingen. Een complicatie hierbij is dat een deel van de verklaringen van auteurs in het Frans zijn gedaan. Ik weet niet of je een idee hebt hoeveel mensen op OTRS Frans spreken in verhouding tot het aantal binnenkomende Franstalige berichten? Ik zal het je verklappen: veel te weinig. In de praktijk behandel ik veel Franstalige mails, met mijn zeer beperkte kennis van het Frans, omdat een ander er simpelweg niet aan toekomt. In het geval van FredD hebben een paar collega's de zaak opgepakt en zijn er ook al afbeeldingen gemarkeerd. Voor zover ik gezien heb zijn de toestemmingen in orde en is het FredD niet te verwijten dat we er nog een hele kluif aan hebben om het allemaal op de juiste manier te verwerken. Je interfereert met deze verwerking door de files te blijven taggen. Ik wil dat je de uploads van FredD met rust laat. En net als de collega die je geblokkeerd heeft, beschik ook ik over de juiste knopjes om deze woorden kracht bij te zetten als dat nodig is. Jcb (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Fichier supprimé de la page Yves Gomy[edit]
Bonjour Jcb, Désolé, mais le fichier que vous avez supprimé de la page Yves Gomy n'était pas le même que celui qui avait été supprimé par la "communauté" faute de licence suffisante. Le fichier replacé est un travail personnel, libre de tout droit. Ce serait bien de le rétablir ne pensez-vous pas ? Merci. --Erwan de Kerhister (talk) 11:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Peut-être qu'il est un fichier différent, mais il est une violation de la même œuvre représentée. Jcb (talk) 12:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Picture that I uploaded to Commons[edit]
I have been experiencing difficulties this morning with my email service, so I just wanted to know if you received my reply to your letter regarding this photo:
Thank you very much for all your work here on Wikimedia Commons, and if you did not receive my letter, please let me know, and I will send it again when my email service is back to normal.
All the best, Dontreader (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- I did receive your message and just wrote a response. Everything seems fine now. Jcb (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I think it arrived while I was writing on your talk page. Thanks again! Dontreader (talk) 19:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Some baklava for you![edit]
Thank you for the essential work that you do here on Commons. Your time, work and courtesy are very much appreciated! Dontreader (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC) |
Hallo. I uploaded this file and asked David Gruber (the person on photo) himself to send email to OTRS. Webpages www.gruber.cz are his webpages, photos are published here, and email should originate from the same domain. The photographer of these photographs (including the one in question) is Slava Slavik, friend of Mr. Gruber who made the photos for him. What additional information or explanation should I provide or ask to provide? Thank you. Zephram (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- We need to receive permission from Slava Slavik, not from David Gruber. The copyright holder of a picture is the photographer, not the depicted person. Jcb (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
File:David Clarke 1.png[edit]
I see you added OTRS permission for this file. The file was uploaded by BiertonCorrespondent as "own work". Is it now OK to remove the warning at User talk:BiertonCorrespondent#File tagging File:David Clarke 1.png and separate warnings be added each for File:Clarke David.jpg and File:David Clarke.jpg?
I saw that you've changed the author's name from "BiertonCorrespondent" to "David Clarke". Is this OK to do on Commons? The same thing might be considered unintentional outing on Wikipedia.
Finally, just for reference, there's another editor named 519Clarke who's currently blocked for repeated copyvios claiming a derivative of the File:Borstal_Boy_Opera_News_Pt_1.webm uploaded by "BiertonCorrespondent" as their "own work". The 519Clarke file which was deleted can be seen here. 519Clarke tried to readd the photo to Wikipedia with this edit by external link. So, it looks as if there are two editors claiming essentially the same file as "own work", but I cannot tell if both editors are the same person, or if either is the same David Clarke who created this photobucket page. Any ideas as to what is going on? Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Normally we do not remove tagging notifications, but the user himself is allowed to remove them from his talk page. They are just notifications. Regarding the author field, we have to update it if the author is not the uploader and the name of the uploader is in the author field. Whatever they may call it at some local Wikipedia version, here at Wikimedia Commons we consider it necessary to obey the license terms. Regarding the picture, if I get an OTRS ticket to process about it, I will scrutinize it like I always do. Jcb (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply and clarification. Does Commons have any rules regarding multiple accounts? English Wikipedia has en:WP:MULTIPLE, but I'm not sure if that applies here. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- We have Commons:SOCK. Jcb (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Just for reference. BiertonCorrespondent has been blocked indefinitely on en:Special:Contributions/BiertonCorrespondent for abusing multiple accounts. Not sure if that affects anything on Commons. - Marchjuly (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- We have Commons:SOCK. Jcb (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply and clarification. Does Commons have any rules regarding multiple accounts? English Wikipedia has en:WP:MULTIPLE, but I'm not sure if that applies here. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Friedhof Lilienthalstraße, Plan.jpg[edit]
Hi, you confirmed OTRS permission for this file, but forgot to add a license. Could you pls. have another look. Thx. --JuTa 17:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
The same applies to File:MGabSmulders 2014 11 07 0368.jpg. --JuTa 18:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Jcb Du hast in diesem Artikel Fotos gelöscht... eine Diskussion über diese Fotos fand hier:
statt und wurden positiv beantwortet
(die Bilder sind von mir)
darf ich deine Löschung rückgängig machen? viele Grüße Oskar --Flussbus (talk) 22:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Nein, sehe hier. Die dargestellte Objekt ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Reː Lorenzo Enrique Peirano (1939 - Chile).[edit]
Saludos Jcb. Según la información que tengo, en un principio se pensó que la propietaria de los derechos de autor era Silvana Giancaspero, pues Alphonso Peirano no tuvo hijos. Myriam Giancaspero –quien dono la imagen en 1998–, tiene 80 años y además afectada con la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Yo envié un correo a Silvana Giancaspero, y Lorenzo Peirano está intentando conseguir su teléfono particular. Ella es sobrina de Myriam Giancaspero, pero al parecer ella no es propietaria de los derechos. La imagen tiene más de 70 años, y por lo que veo nadie tiene derechos sobre este archivo, es de dominio público. Un saludo. --Deucaleon (talk) 13:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Para saber si entró en el dominio público, hay que saber quien fue el fotógrafo y cuando murió. Jcb (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Según Lorenzo Peirano, el fotógrafo fue su tío Alphonso Peirano, hermano mayor del retratado, quien falleció en 1941. La fotografía fue realizada el 21 de agosto de 1939, según la inscripción que aparece al reverso. Saludos cordiales.--Deucaleon (talk) 18:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Ayuda con archivo[edit]
Perdona la molestia Jcb, me puedes ayudar, por favor, con la confirmación de este archivo Jorge Teillier Sandoval (1965). De antemano muchas gracias. Saludos. --Deucaleon (talk) 19:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Si el permiso está en OTRS, un día vamos a tratarlo. (No voy a buscar). Jcb (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Your revdel on Trijnstel's talk page[edit]
Jcb, your revdel on Trijnstel's talk page can you please explain for what reason you did that? Is it because of Natuur12's totally false assertion that Trijnstel's "private" email has been made public.
I'm not sure if you know, but:
- https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/stewards-l clearly states : Stewards-l list run by trijnstel at hotmail.com, billinghurst at gmail.com, mattbisanz at yahoo.com
- https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/checkuser-l clearly states : CheckUser-l list run by risker.wp at gmail.com, cooties at me.com, cooties at mac.com, jamesofur at gmail.com, tiptoety at gmail.com, mardetanha.wiki at gmail.com, danny.leinad at gmail.com, matanya at foss.co.il, billinghurst at gmail.com, barras-ps at web.de, trijnstel at hotmail.com
Trijnstel's email address is one of the most public email addresses amongst all of us. So there is no privacy violation in this instance, if that was the reason for your revdel. Surely you would now I would have very carefully checked this before deciding to leaving the email address intact to prove the email was genuine. I would ask you not to take everything you read at face value.
I'll be replying in that thread in due course but you may wish to mention the above yourself. There's more misinformation there at the moment than there is in a Jen Psaki press briefing. :) russavia (talk) 13:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- I am thoroughly aware of the circumstances. In my decission to revdel the links to the private email message (not just the address), I have taken various aspects into account and have decided that is was the most appropriate to revdel the links. You know that I am not alone in this point of view. Jcb (talk) 14:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
OTRS image problem[edit]
Last month you added an OTRS ticket to File:Todd Mason.png but never added the agreed copyright tag to the image. I was doing some unlicenced image history checks and noticed this one. Maybe you can fix it. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 00:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:St. Bernardus Prior 8.jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:St. Bernardus Prior 8.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you. |
JuTa 19:15, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of KevinMichaelSmitz.jpg[edit]
Hello Jcb,
I appreciate your hard work on W.C. However, I am afraid the recent deletion of KevinMichaelSmitz.jpg could be a simple misunderstanding. The picture license has been sent to email@example.com some time ago. It has been resent again yesterday. Therefore, I would be greatful if you could restore it. Thank you. AlainMichelParis (talk) 08:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- The permission is not valid. On 12 November we explained to Kevin Michael Smitz that permission normally has to come from the photographer, not from the depicted person. He never answered our message. Jcb (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Picture of Pierre Karl Péladeau[edit]
Hi mate! I was wondering, I just send to COMMONS the email I received from the people that are in charge of this photo, and nobody accepted it... Can you check if any emails were received for me please, it'll be great! Thank you very much!
Here the photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PKP2015.jpg
--SharQc (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- No, tickets are processed in order of entrance. You cannot bypass the queue this way. Jcb (talk) 02:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Yeonmi Park[edit]
Hi. I saw you deleted this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Yeonmi_Park_in_a_hanbok.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 / Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yeonmi Park in a hanbok.jpg. I dunno what OTRS is and currently, I am to lazy to look into it. The only thing I wanted to say is, that the same uploader also uploaded File:Yeonmi Park.JPG. Maybe you could look into this. By searching with Google, the pic appears on Italian sites in Articles of a guy named Leone Grotti. --Christian Bolz (talk) 19:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- The deleted file was apparently grabbed from the web. The other file is an original file from an iPhone. OTRS is our ticket system for email messages. Jcb (talk) 19:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Could you please review your previous decision to delete this image? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- I think that decision was correct. I have created a new DR with a link to the previous one. Let's see what happens. Jcb (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Anne Mulder.jpg[edit]
File:Anne Mulder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Anne.mulder (talk) 12:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
File:RG wiki.jpg[edit]
Hallo Jcb, I am sort of annoyed about the dealings with that and other fotos, see as well the File:Voss IMG 0956.JPG pic. I have had clear OKs per mail to use that foto under the apprpriate licences, RG refered as well that the foto was being made by someone in his family. I don't think the way the fotos and the OKs are being dealt with is appropriate. BR Serten II (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Three months ago I clearly stated why the permission was insufficient. You called that ridiculous, but didn't fix it. Jcb (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
fichier Sem-ayache-galmiche-201406032.jpg[edit]
Le fichier Sem-ayache-galmiche-201406032.jpg a été supprimé alors que j'ai eu l'autorisation du Collège de France d'utiliser ce fichier et vous avez bien été mis en copie simultanée par le Collège de France(copie du mail ci-dessous j'ai retiré les @ mail perso).
D'autre part vous signalez lors de la suppression que je n'ai pas répondu au bout de 30 jours. Je n'ai pas eu cet avertissement.
Merci d'avance.
--Amage9 (talk) 07:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Circus Maximus[edit]
In 2011 you deleted a file from Commons that was used on the en:Circus Maximus (game) article. Would it be possible for me to obtain a copy of the file with the proper info and re-upload it to en-wiki? BOZ (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- You may send us an email, info-commonswikimedia.org, to which we can reply with the file. Jcb (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Upload GILL, James: "Grace Kelly in Sun (2013)"[edit]
can you please upload the deleted file again to Wikimedia? The licence was given by licence owner Ted Bauer @ www.premium-modern-art.com!!! What's the problem with it? I forwarded the OK to firstname.lastname@example.com. Regards, Norbert
- If a valid permission has been sent by email, somebody will process it some day. Bothering individual OTRS volunteers is not helpful. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
No revenge[edit]
- Hi, this is not revenge nomination. Please, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vikiçizer. I'm still sad for toy files, they're gonna be deleted. My files about toy pianos deleted like yours. And they said "Please do start a deletion request for any files or categories you think are copyright violations. If you want I can show you some easy ways to start a DR" and i'm doing what i believed. We're gonna see the results about nominations. thanks...Vikiçizer (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
¿Difficulties with volunteering OTRS?[edit]
Jcb, How are you. I see difficulty with acknowledgments from OTRS volunteers. Should conduct interviews with other users interested in volunteering. I think there should be many knowledgeable. I am at your service. A greeting.Deucaleon (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I am quite busy off-wiki, but I am fine. New volunteers at OTRS are welcome, you can apply here. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Johan!
Comme demandé par Félix Mansiago, j'ai redemandé aux ayant de droit de la photo de renvoyé leur consentement ainsi que la licence sous laquelle la photo pouvait être publié! Pouvez-vous validez le tout? Merci!
--SharQc (talk) 00:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- S'il vous plaît continuer la conversation par e-mail, pas ici. Jcb (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I was not aware of it; sorry. I was willing to wait for your opinion as I saw the old ticket only after the restoration. But the discussion is closed and there is a consensus to accept that permission as it comes from a govt. department. Hope everything OK now and we can close that case. (I too very strict in evaluating permissions; but when it comes from a verifiable address, I'm willing to accept it as we only follows DMCA so that who gives permission is liable ultimately.) Have a nice day. Jee 02:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Can you please explain why ScottPageAMLORTour.jpg was deleted? This is the permission that was sent for its use:
from: scott to: permissions cc: date: Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM subject: Scott Wikipedia photo mailed-by: iamscottpage.com signed-by: iamscottpage.com
To Wikimedia Commons (email@example.com) and Wikipedia Editor 1987atomheartbrother:
I hereby affirm that I, Scott Page, am the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of attached image(s)/text.
I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Scott Page (Copyright holder)
December 22, 2014
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- As you were told already by e-mail, permission has to come from the photographer, not from the depicted person. Jcb (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Could you please clarify which email this went to? I am trying to resolve this issue. This is Scott Page's property. If you need the photographer to clarify that he has given those rights to Scott or that he himself will grant those rights to Wikipedia, could you at least please tell me where yous sent the email? I never received it, I've even looked in Spam: so good faith should presume there's a misunderstanding here. Any feedback would be appreciated.--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you very much - I forward it to Scott Page to make sure he doesn't miss it.--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 11:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Question about a picture I uploaded[edit]
I recently uploaded this picture: File:Redhead Express in Utah while filming a music video.jpg. I forwarded a conversation email to the OTRS team with informal consent for releasing the image, I added the OTRS pending tag, and I promised that the owner of the picture would send in a formal declaration of consent soon. Could you please tell me how many days OTRS volunteers usually wait for the formal declaration of consent from the author before the picture is deleted? This issue is causing me stress. I customized the letter so that the author would merely have to copy and paste what I did so that the declaration of consent would only take a couple of minutes to send in, but it hasn't been sent in yet, I don't think, although only a couple of days have past. So, again, please, in how many days would the image be deleted if no formal declaration of consent is sent in, and would this damage my reputation here at Commons? Many thanks in advance for your reply. Have a great day! Dontreader (talk) 08:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- I just noticed that your page says, "For any questions about OTRS permissions, please visit the OTRS/Noticeboard", so I will do that. I hope you are doing well, and thanks for all the work you do for Commons. Dontreader (talk) 03:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Permiso enviado el 22 de enero de 2015[edit]
Hola Jcb, gusto de saludarle. Paso por aquí para solicitar su ayuda. Entiendo que habido algunos problemas con la verificación de permisos, y la verdad, es que no quiero ser una molestia para usted. Pues bien. Me he encontrado con esta planilla de verificación de autorización en este archivo. Se envió permiso por su autor el 22 de enero de 2015, 18:20 y hoy se ha vuelto a enviar. Espero usted me pueda ayudar con esta confirmación. La verdad no quiero ser una molestia para usted. Desde ya muchas gracias. Un saludo. Deucaleon (talk) 18:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Your assistance please...[edit]
In your last comment on User talk:Geo Swan you wrote:
- "Although we may never become friends, we have to realize that we are working in the same community. I would like to just forget about any conflict we have had in the past and have a clean start."
Okay. I am going to take that at face value.
I am faced with a mystery, and I am asking for your help with it. In Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) I linked to Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship)#The dangers of volunteers who want to_do more than their share -- a kind of mini-essay on the dangers "supervolunteers" who do more than their share can pose to organizations who rely on volunteers.
I want to turn those comments into a general essay on the dangers of supervolunteers.
The first odd thing I noticed is that Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship) no longer has a subsection entitled "#The dangers of volunteers who want to_do more than their share"
The second odd thing is that there is no record in the revision history of the deadmin discussion that I left any comments, or participated, at all. I am sure you remembered I left multiple comments.
I looked at the log for that page. I didn't recognize any sign that my comments had been excised.
Can I ask you if anyone contacted you, and told you that they were going to excise my comments? If so, did they offer a justification for that excision?
I know regular administrators can mask a particular revision, or a range of revisions, so ordinary contributors can't see them. But, regular contributors can still see, in the revision history, that a particular contribution or range of contributions were made. I am mystified as to why my contributions aren't even showing up in the contribution history.
I think an essay of the dangers of supervolunteers is potentially valuable, and I hope you agree. Will you help me find this missing text? Geo Swan (talk) 01:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I don't think anything has been removed. I have never asked or been asked about revision deletions. There are two de-adminship discussions, your comments are in the second: Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 2). Jcb (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
A brownie for you![edit]
Many thanks for your hard work here at Commons and for giving permission to use this image: File:Redhead Express in Utah while filming a music video.jpg. Wikipedia needs pictures in order to be a real encyclopedia, so I'm very grateful for your help! Dontreader (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC) |
Please help close an old DN[edit]
On the ancient DN and the one following it ... the upper one had images kept due to an OTRS ticket being sent, could you check and close the bottom one as well ? Thanks so much! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


text: You are not logged in. Please click here to log in and view secured content such as the Discount Marketplace, Pay Stubs Online and Benefits. Once you log in, these links will appear at the top of the list below.Note: As of Feb. 25, 2010 the log-in system has been streamlined and you will be able to sign in once to navigate through the site. Exceptions may happen if you are taken to an outside web site. The ID and password you previously created are still valid. Welcome to the Salaried Employee Page. In this section of @Ford Online you can find information of interest to Ford Salary Employees.


text:
About the program
Areas of research
News and events
Faculty main page
Babette Fuss Associate Professor of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Degree: Ph.D., Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich Research interest: Molecular mechanisms of myelin sheath formation during normal development and during remyelination under pathological conditions; studies of the contribution of cytotoxic T cells to oligodendrocyte damage in vitro and in vivo. E-mail: email@example.com Web site
Virginia Commonwealth University • School of Medicine Molecular Biology and Genetics P.O. Box 980678 • Richmond, VA 23298-0678 Phone: (804) 828-9093 • Contact Us Last Modified on: 5/23/14


text:
Walls are built to imprison, create obstacles
to movement of people, to keep people out. They are built in the mind,
in the heart and over time—with suspicion, fear, racism, classism,"
Murray D. Finck, bishop of the ELCA Pacifica Synod, told 50 religious and civic leaders gathered Nov. 8-14 in Wittenberg, Germany.
spoke at "Mighty Fortresses and Mustard Seeds: Life in the Shadow of a
Wall," where participants from Germany, Palestine, Mexico and the U.S.
discussed the church's role in breaking down visible and invisible
walls. The event was sponsored by the ELCA Network of International
Learning Centers, ELCA Global Mission, ELCA Vocation and Education, and the Evangelical Academy of Sachsen-Anhalt.
The rest of this article is only available to subscribers.
© 2015 Augsburg Fortress, Publishers


text:
Shane from Old Paint Design loves building furniture for other people, so, of course, she was up for the job when her BFF needed new bedside tables. The criteria for the table was that it have a drawer, closed in sides, an open bottom for display, and a dark stain finish. Shane got to searching […Read More]
Bedside Table with Drawer
Filed Under: Pottery Barn Tagged With: bedside table, build your own, copycat, Cynthia Side Table, DIY, how-to, nightstand, pb inspired, project plan, woodwork, woodworking


text:
v.2.180 rev.6
main page
Ichiban Kuji Jojo no Kimyou na Bouken Stardust Crusaders ~Black Side~: The World Another Color ver.
Share it with
Original (anime):
Reduce all
Character name: | |
Figure type: | Game Prize |
Height: | 200 mm |
Manufacturer: | Banpresto |
Series: | Ichiban Kuji Jojo no Kimyou na Bouken Stardust Crusaders ~Black Side~ |
Owners: | 0 |
2nd chance campaign figure.
2nd chance campaign figure.
These pictures were taken by Banpresto or authorized person. Please visit manufacturer's home page in order to learn more. © 荒木飛呂彦&LUCKY LAND COMMUNICATIONS/集英社. All rights reserved.
Add external links
External links: none.
0 |
add a comment
Only registered users can post comments.
Please log in with your username and password or with the help of other services:
You can also create new account by filling out the form.


text:
Baxter Springs City Park
Baxter Springs,
Phone: (620) 856-2112
Visit Campground Website
Sites: 20
Recent Rate: $10 5/2014
Latitude: 37.0232157410054
Longitude: -94.7215929206543
These reviews are the opinion of an RVParkReviews' member and not the views of RVParkReviews.com
Date of Stay: May, 2014 - $10.00
This park was very nice to stay in while we worked to help the Red Cross using our motorhome as a base during the tornado restoration work that we did. Each pedestal at each site has a 30 amp as well as a 50 amp hookup, with good electricity and has good water pressure also available. In addition, there is a dump station in the park as well. Virtually every site is fully shaded, with parking on asphalt large enough to place all wheels of a 40' motor-home off the grass. As instructed we called the Police Department for permission to stay and the Lady there suggested that we might prefer to come to the Police station to avoid any potential hassle with regards to paying. We understood that the Police are busy, however we regularly saw them patrolling the road alongside the park, but we knew that we should pay the $10 nightly fee, and so we took her suggestion. Our stay there was uneventful, peaceful, and we would stay there again. We camped at Baxter Springs City Park in a Motorhome.
Date of Stay: March, 2014 - $10.00
No facilities at this park just porta potties. Took moving three times to find a plug-in that worked. Very kid friendly has a huge park with playground. You have to go by the police department to get the permit they wouldn't come out for us so best to stop on the way by. We camped at Baxter Springs City Park in a Motorhome.
Date of Stay: August, 2013 - $10.00
We stayed here while driving Route 66. Campers need to contact the Baxter Springs Police Department for a permit to camp. Even though we called the police department, no one ever came to collect the fee. A dump station is available. There are both back-in and pull-thru sites. Grass was long but it had been rainy for a few weeks. We were able to wash our rig and tow car at our site. We would stay here again. We camped at Baxter Springs City Park in a Travel Trailer.
UndoPre-Register below to access free and enhanced features coming in the near future.
Access to marketing tools, ability respond to reviews and monitor performance as well as expanded listings.
More Information about our Campground Owner Management and its enhancements are coming very soon. Features subject to change.


text:
COLUMBIA — Hogs, sheep and cattle populate Walker Claridge's farm in Callaway County, along with crops that include tomatoes, lettuce and other vegetables.
Farming or ranching practices that adversely affect his land could be afforded protections by Amendment 1 on Tuesday's ballot, he said. Regulations that proponents of Amendment 1 consider harmful or unnecessary can serve as measures of protection for smaller farmers like himself, Walker said.
"Every landowner should have rights to protect themselves from what their neighbors do," he said.
Claridge, who also co-owns Broadway Brewery, was one of three local farmers who spoke in opposition to Amendment 1 on Thursday afternoon at the Missouri Rural Crisis Center on Rangeline Road, which has long advocated on behalf of smaller producers.
He asked rhetorically whether Missouri residents really needed the amendment, which has been named "Right to Farm" by supporters: "No. The Missouri courts and legislature will always allow it. So who does need it? Corporate agriculture, so they won't be liable for their mistakes."
If approved by voters, Amendment 1 will "forever guarantee" the rights of ranchers and farmers to engage in practices related to farming and ranching. The amendment has sharply divided the state.
Claridge said the average family farmer has nothing to gain from the amendment and could instead lose land value thanks to the waste and smells created by confined animal feeding operations, or CAFOs.
Proponents say CAFOs and other agricultural production methods need the amendment as protection from harmful and unnecessary regulations. Supporters include the Missouri Farm Bureau, Missouri Farmers Care and the Missouri Cattlemen's Association.
Opponents say the amendment does not benefit family farms. Instead, they said, it is designed to help large agribusiness corporations, such as Cargill, Monsanto and Smithfield Foods. Other opponents include the Osage chapter of the Sierra Club, the Humane Society of the United States and the Missouri Farmers Union.
Rhonda Perry, another local farmer and the program director for the rural crisis center, said that during the past year, the General Assembly opened the door to foreign ownership of Missouri land, which led to the purchase of Smithfield, a large hog corporation, by a Chinese investment group. The center opposed the sale and has been opposed to the construction of a CAFO in Callaway County.
"We can see the direction this is going," she said.
She also said that if the amendment passes, agricultural policy-making decisions will pass from the public onto the courts.
"The court system is a bad place to make policy," she said.
Supervising editor is John Schneller.


text:
Optimus provides professional web services and solutions that are tailored to best fit the goals and long-term success of each of our clients. Our process is one that's been proven time and again to deliver results that meet the needs of each project. Each of web development requires specific skills to accomplish particular tasks. The internet is a complex environment, and having a solid presence requires mastery of many different elements. Optimus has put together a record of success that includes experience and expertise in every kind of internet service. Our approach is to look at what the client wants to do and craft a strategy and solution that will accomplish that. To this end, we bring in many elements that are commonly described separately as "services." For us, though, it is all part of one service. Below is a laundry list of services that are part of many projects. Some projects may require only a few of these, while others will ask us for even more. The list describes many of the things we can do and have done, but it is suggestive, not exhaustive. Whether you are considering custom website design, web hosting and maintenance, or redesign of an existing website, Optimus has the knowledge, experience, and ability to give you the best results.
Web Site Consultation/ Strategic Development Information Architecture Content Development/Copywriting Graphic Design Backend/Programming Search Engine Optimization Content Management Site Maintenance
In addition to the major services listed above, we have skills and experience in a wide array of of related areas, as listed below. Although these services are requested less often, we are ready to provide them to any client who requires them.
Logo Design Domain Name Registration Hosting E-Commerce Shopping Cart Site Search Integrated Blogging Chatrooms Contact Forms Referral Forms Online Databases Password Protected Sections Downloadable Files Multimedia Security Site Testing Open Source Solutions
View Featured Resources to learn more about Our Services: PRESENTATION: Optimus Media Works Overview OMW PDF: Website Design Services at a Glance Request a Quote for any of Our Services: LINK: Request a Quote


text:
Blowfish Ellis Bootie
Sorry, this item is sold out!
Looks like you've got more shoe shopping to do - have fun!
Looks like you've got more shoe shopping to do - have fun!
Item # 298021
Cute cutouts, buckle strap accents and a demi wedge give the Blowfish Ellis peep toe bootie all the details you need! This adorable ankle boot will keep your casual look right on trend.
- Slouchy faux leather upper
- Back zipper for easy on/off
- Buckle strap accents
- Side cutouts
- Round peep toe
- 3" covered demi wedge heel
- Synthetic sole
- Imported
- View more Women's Blowfish Shoes
June 11, 2014
"Definitely one of the most comfortable pairs of shoes I have EVER wore. These are amazing and super cute!"
April 28, 2014
"Love these booties! I wear an 8... ordered a 7 1/2 because other reviews said they were too big... the half size smaller is perfect!"
April 10, 2014
Cute but HUGE!
"I typically wear between an 8 1/2 and a 9. I ordered the 8 1/2 due to people saying these run big. I can put an entire finger between my heel and the shoe!!! They are going back...I need an 8. I haven't bought an 8 in probably 15+ years...these are HUGE! I'm hoping those will fit. The top of the shoe is very soft and I think they will be comfortable if I can get them to fit correctly."
Click anywhere to close this.


text:
Get the Best Priced Mercedes C230 Radiator Fan
- Fast Shipping
- 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
- Lowest Prices
Mercedes C230 Replacement Radiator Fan Information
Mercedes is trusted for engineering innovative automobiles that deliver long lasting performance and great driver control. Driving a very handsome Mercedes, a responsive drive train ensures a really wonderful highway ride. Comfort-focused cars such as the well-appointed Mercedes C230 were manufactured to be handled carefully and then regularly repaired and serviced. For rugged service and powerful performance from a car, consumers can believe in Mercedes. If a problem comes up or a part needs to be replaced, that's not the time to save with a second-rate component. Your Mercedes C230 will reward you for installing genuine OEM and aftermarket car parts to run at the highest efficiency. It's no shock that well-informed drivers understand how to get the best quality at a reasonable price when seeking out Mercedes C230 replacement parts. Mercedes is recognized for building vehicles that provide long lasting reliability and consistent durability. Mercedes automobiles have built a lasting and well-earned tradition of delivering hand-crafted style. When contemplating quality and rugged durability, vehicle buyers can't go wrong with a car crafted by Mercedes. You purchased that high-performance vehicle to enjoy its superb power and performance, back up your investment and use first rate replacement parts and accessories. Outstanding horsepower and road performance are derived from great components and accessories. Your Mercedes C230 Radiator Fan can be found immediately in front of the radiator and blows chiller outside air across the radiator fins. Mercedes C230 Radiator Fans improve the circulation of cold air through the car's coolant system, especially at times when the vehicle is not in motion. Your Mercedes C230 Radiator Fan is belt driven and may be built out of either metal or plastic and is commonly shielded by a shroud. A Mercedes C230 Radiator Fan maximizes the flow of air around the radiator so that the cooling system is successfully cooled. A Mercedes C230 Radiator Fan forces cool exterior air into the radiator to increase temperature reduction. Sometimes the most difficult thing about repairing an older vehicle is looking for an honest source for quality parts. Hunting for an honest source for reliable parts can feel like looking for a needle in a haystack, but it doesn't need to.
They are available for the following Mercedes C230 years: 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 09, 08, 07, 06, 05, 04, 03, 02, 00, 99, 98, 97. This part is also sometimes called Mercedes C230 Cooling System. We stock radiator fan parts for most Mercedes models including S430, E320, S500, ML320, CLK320, S600, E300, E420, 300E, 300D, ML430, E430, 300SD, 190E, 420SEL, E350, C240, C300, 450SL, E55 AMG, SLK230, 560SEL, CL500, 560SL, 380SL, 300TE, SLK320, ML350, 300TD, CL55 AMG, 240D, 300SDL, C220, 300SE, CL600, S55 AMG, 500SEL, E550, E500 and 300CE.
We stock these Radiator Fan brands for the Mercedes C230: Genuine, Action Crash, Vemo, VDO, Replacement and Dorman.
05 2005 Mercedes C230 Accessory Belt Idler Pulley INA
04 2004 Mercedes C230 Expansion Tank Meyle
97 1997 Mercedes C230 Fan Blade APA/URO Parts
99 1999 Mercedes C230 Fan Clutch Behr
98 1998 Mercedes C230 Fan Shroud Vemo
07 2007 Mercedes C230 Radiator Metrix - Plastic Tank
02 2002 Mercedes C230 Radiator Hose Lower Genuine
05 2005 Mercedes C230 Thermostat Wahler
02 2002 Mercedes C230 Water Pump Graf
The dealer wanted $930.00 to install the fan so i asked how much the fan would be alone that was $630.00 and they gave me the number of the fan and said it would take 2 hours. The fan from Parts Geek was the same fan number
in the Mercedes box and took 45 minutes to put in a piece of cake.
Parts geek is the best parts stop on the web. I always find what I need and at the best deal than other sites on the web


text:
Christ Follower, Husband, Father, Pastor, Counselor
Thanks for stopping by my home on the internet. I encourage you to browse through and check out some of my postings. You will find some of my sermons and writings as well as information about my family and me.
Blessings, Brian
Common Ground Message, 11-06-11 from Brian Miller on Vimeo.
Eastern KY Mission Trip July 2011 from Brian Miller on Vimeo.
An inter-generational group from First Baptist Church, Bristol, Virginia took a trip to Powell and Owlsley counties in Kentucky, July 8-15, 2011 to help two residents with home repairs and to share the love of God. This is their story.
My family and I enjoy living in beautiful Bristol, Virginia.
Email firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf talks about the economy, the consequences of bad loans and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in this interview. Stumpf says the CFPB has "been asked to do an impossible job. I hope they get it right."
View Full Article in:
Philadelphia Inquirer, ThePublished in Brief:


text:
More New and Used
from Private Sellers
New Perspectives on Microsoft Office Excel 2007, Comprehensive, Premium Video Edition
by Parsons, June Jamrich; Oja, Dan; Ageloff, Roy; Carey, Patrick M.DVD
Cengage Learning
Questions About This Book?
Why should I rent this book?
Renting is easy, fast, and cheap! Renting from eCampus.com can save you hundreds of dollars compared to the cost of new or used books each semester. At the end of the semester, simply ship the book back to us with a free UPS shipping label! No need to worry about selling it back.
How do rental returns work?
Returning books is as easy as possible. As your rental due date approaches, we will email you several courtesy reminders. When you are ready to return, you can print a free UPS shipping label from our website at any time. Then, just return the book to your UPS driver or any staffed UPS location. You can even use the same box we shipped it in!
What version or edition is this?
This is the DVD edition with a publication date of 2/10/2010.
What is included with this book?
- The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any CDs, lab manuals, study guides, etc.
- The Used copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included.
- The Rental copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. You may receive a brand new copy, but typically, only the book itself.
- The eBook copy of this book is not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically only the book itself is included.
Related Products
Market leading text, New Perspectives on Microsoft Office Excel 2007 now comes with video!
The tutorial videos focus on the most important or difficult concepts and skills, helping students better engage in and retain information. With the text's critical thinking, case-based approach students understand why they're learning what they're learning, and are prepared to easily transfer skills to new situations.
Table of Contents
Managing Your Files | |
Getting Started with Microsoft Office 2007 | |
Getting Started with Excel | |
Formatting a Workbook | |
Working with Formulas and Functions | |
Working with Charts and Graphics | |
Working with Excel Tables, Pivot Tables, and Pivot Charts | |
Managing Multiple Worksheets and Workbooks | |
Using Advanced Functions, Conditional Formatting, and Filtering | |
Developing an Excel Application | |
Developing a Financial Analysis | |
Performing What-If Analyses | |
Connecting to External Data | |
Expanding Excel with Visual Basic for Applications | |
Additional Cases | |
Appendices | |
Working with Text Functions and Creating Custom Formats | |
Integrating Excel with Other Windows Programs | |
Creating a Shared Workbook | |
Working with Enhanced Formatting Tools | |
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved. |