text:
We've got some amazing offers on accommodation, travel, activities and attractions to help you get the most value from your trip to Ireland
Whether you fancy a stay in a fabulous Bed and Breakfast, a few days staying on a farm, or a luxury stay in one of our 5* hotels, find a great deal to suit you.
Explore the world's longest defined touring route stretching 2,500km from Donegal to Kinsale and find great deals along the way!
Great value vacation offers for the golfer and non-golfer in your group.
Book a car rental & a selection of accommodations to take you on your self-drive adventure.
Guided tours with large or small groups with all transport and accommodation pre-arranged.
Can we help you with anything else? Find out how to get in touch by email, Facebook and more.
For more information on travel, accommodation and attractions have a look at our brochures and maps.
If you're a visitor from the island of Ireland you may want to visit one of these sites… Otherwise proceed to Ireland.com
Ireland.com uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from Ireland.com.


text:
Membership status: Member
What can I say? I'm a scatterbrained twenty-year old from deep in the heart of Texas; as a college student, Veterinary Technician, and an athlete, a mucisian and a writer, if I'm not writing, chances are I'm in a sword-fight with someone (and probably being stabbed by an epee), I'm attending to an animal in need, or I'm locked away studying something Biomedical Sciences-ish. Whichever way, it's fun all around, yeah? *grins*
My writing:
I like to explore characters that often are not focused on in the books, and put them in situations that are realistic for the Harry Potter series as we know it. I think this is why I enjoy the Marauder Era so much--we know bits and flashes of their story, Harry's history, but there are enough gaps left to present an enjoyable challenge when it comes to setting this living history to paper. You might notice that I tend to be somewhat of a romantic as well, and have fallen in love with the tragic tales of James and Lily, Alice and Frank.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Description & Highlights
Snowie Shaved Ice Syrup Concentrate - 16oz
Shaved ice wouldn't be much of a treat without a variety of mouth-watering flavors to choose from. Snowie's Shaved Ice Syrup Concentrate (SNOWIEPINT) comes in the best flavors on the planet used to flavor shaved ice, coffee, or ice cream. These flavor syrups are economical and easy to use in concentrate form, so you can mix up as little as 16oz of flavoring at a time.
For delicious shaved ice, simply pour 1oz of concentrate into the 32oz serving bottle and fill it up with sugar-water. You'll especially love the available exotic flavor combinations - Tiger's Blood (Strawberry and Coconut), Hawaiian Tropic (Fruit Punch and Tropical Punch), Bug Juice (Strawberry and Banana), and Suicide (Blueberry, Tropical Punch, and Peach). It's quick, easy, and fun.
22 Flavors Available:
Stock up on a variety of flavors for delicious fun all summer longConcentrated:
Mix up only as much syrup as you need with these flavor concentratesTasty Summer Treats:
You'll stay cool all summer long with yummy shaved ice treats in nearly any flavor you can think of
Specifications & Manuals
- Model: SNOWIEPINTSnowie Shaved Ice Syrup Concentrate
- Brand: SnowieFlavor concentrate for making shaved ice syrups
- 22 flavors to choose fromSize: 16oz


text:
$103 for a 2.5oz isn't a good deal. you could get those prices on ebay.
There are about 4 or 5 bottles left. Just blind bought mine, hope i'm not disappointed. I would love anyone who picks it up to report back about the authenticity when they receive it; I won't be able to pick mine up until I travel to the US in maybe 3 months, had it shipped to my aunt's house since I do not live in the US.
$103 for a 2.5oz isn't a good deal. you could get those prices on ebay.
I paid $70 for a bottle from Amazon earlier this year...
My Top 10
1. Amouage Homage Attar
2. Serge Lutens - Muscs Koublai Khan
4. Serge Lutens - Ambre Sultan
5. Chanel Egoiste
6. 24 Gold by Scentstory
7. Amouage Epic Man
8. Amouage Jubilation XXV
9. Bond No. 9 New York Oud
10. Serge Lutens - Chergui
"A beautiful fragrance to the nose is like good jazz music to the ears, great food to the mouth, and Megan Fox and Jessica Alba to the eyes..."
i paid $65. but those deals are long gone. it looks like the seller has wised up and started gouging. also where are all these magic, hidden deals everyone talks about. outside of europe, that is the best price for that fragrance right now. Karown, dont worry, it is authentic.
Want to trade - Chanel Platinum Egoiste for Dior Eau Sauvage...
Last edited by AZsmells; 3rd December 2011 at 05:18 PM.
Oriscent, AgarAura Pure Ouds, Creed, LIDGE, Patou Pour Homme, tons of niche and rare stuff for sale!
You're right, sometimes 5 bucks is all it takes to seal the deal. OK all you LIDGE fanatics, I want to see all those bottles gone from AZs page by the end of the weekend!!! The magic juice is now in your reach. Panties will vaporize all around you!!!!!
Want to trade - Chanel Platinum Egoiste for Dior Eau Sauvage...
The limited edition are ussually not faked that often... Watchout for the very popular ones... Lemale, Acqua Di Gio, etc....
My Top 10
1. Amouage Homage Attar
2. Serge Lutens - Muscs Koublai Khan
4. Serge Lutens - Ambre Sultan
5. Chanel Egoiste
6. 24 Gold by Scentstory
7. Amouage Epic Man
8. Amouage Jubilation XXV
9. Bond No. 9 New York Oud
10. Serge Lutens - Chergui
"A beautiful fragrance to the nose is like good jazz music to the ears, great food to the mouth, and Megan Fox and Jessica Alba to the eyes..."
I got one 3 days ago and turned out to be a local company, however its not here yet. I can see it now, they ship me L'Instant PH instead of extreme by accident, which i already own. Paid 65.00 and they said it was shipped yesterday. Will see.
Yeah that's sometimes a concern too; them shipping the original instead of the extreme. I know the price was a bit high but you cant get it much cheaper elsewhere.
And its gone again...jeez this thing is like the polkaroo of fragrances!
Just bookmark and check this link once or twice a day:
They had it back in stock just last week for $63 shipped.
Debenham's and Escentual in the UK have it back in stock. Again.
Is this adoration just a U.S.A. thing because it's so good and it's limited availability or does L'Instant de Guerlain pour Homme EDP get as much love in Europe?
In the Duty Free shop at the Edinburgh airport it was on the lower shelf of the Guerlain display, fully stocked, and seemingly getting no attention at all.
It seems strange that something so readily available abroad is so 'peekaboo' over here. I love the EDT and have purchased the EDP based on that, but the prices seems to be artificially high here given there isn't a shortage of supply...except in the U.S.A. of course.
interpretation is the revenge of the intellect upon art. - Susan Sontag
It's available again, but for 90 bucks plus 15 bucks for shipping, PLUS tax, PLUS customs since I think the amazon vendor is located in the UK. Bright idea: wait for someone, ANYONE you know to make a trip to ANY European country, give them $100 or whatever, have them pick it up on the way home at duty free (for probably much less than 100), and pick it up from them when they return home to the US. Eventually, someone you know will go somewhere in Europe, either for business or vacation or whatever, so why pay exorbitantly for something so readily available there?
oolafsson, this is crazy! It was out of stock like 20 minutes ago!
I'm from France so I can get if I want I am not willing to pay 110 for this! Well, if you buy from France 75ml is still about 85 dollar!
Agreed, do you know a place to smell this? I don't want to blind buy. I tried EDT one yesterday though. My feelings were pretty mixed. Top notes were kinda "alcoholic" to me. I don't how else I can describe that smell. Once it settled it was something very beautiful but I can't say the longevity was that good. Well, it was only one spritz (was it the word for it? haha) but I can't comment on projection and sillage. I wish perfume vials were more widely available free. They are more freely available in Europe. In the US, you have to buy something to get a vial. It's not fair!
Do not blind buy! It is extremely similar to the EDT with less projection. After 30 min the edp and edt smell the same. EDP just sort of skips the topnotes. Nice but all hype.
Want to trade - Chanel Platinum Egoiste for Dior Eau Sauvage...
Americans are just greedy that way. But usually if you ask for a vial a sales representative won't say "well you can't have a tester unless you buy it," because the whole POINT of testers is that they're meant for a few wears so a person can see how a fragrance develops on their skin before they buy 100ml of the damned stuff only to find that it turns vile on their skin! In my opinion, not having or supplying tester vials with ALL fragrance is just terrible practice. Refuse to buy from those places. Perfume is designed to be tried and bought, not just bought because it looks pretty and the bottle is nice. But then again Americans are superficial...
By EDP do you also mean L'instant Extreme?
It makes two of us. We could be great friends in fact hahaha... But well we have lotsa good americans here so... I call it sample fascism here. Department stores like bloomingdale's etc, they fly kind of a bit high above the line where they categorize people who will buy perfumes at first sight. They squeeze (not sure if it's correct word again) on a card and hand it to you and then expect you to make a decision. Perfumes do not work in this way. Unless s/he is willing to wait for me 3 hours there, I'll not call a perfume nice or bad.
Last edited by shadow_shooter; 22nd December 2011 at 12:56 AM.
Yes, he means the Extreme. This is a way perfume houses confuse people... they call stuff Intense/Extreme/Eau de Parfum/Concentree, and all this other stuff, but sometimes an Extreme is an EDT, sometimes it's an EDP. I have no idea why they're not just consistent about it, but they're not, so oh well.
Hah, I was at a Saks in New York City last week and you cannot even walk UP to a fragrance counter without them immediately spritzing onto a paper, and if you even DARE say it smells nice, they will whip out the bottle and fire at your arm and then almost demand that you buy it right then and there. The absolute worst was at the Bond #9 counter. This irritatingly exuberant man literally butted straight into a conversation I was having with my girlfriend and tried to push me to have her "take a walk" so I could buy her some god-awful new Bond #9 women's fragrance they just released and that because she "took a walk" it would be a "surprise" come Christmas time. Um, how about no, you idiot: you just gave away the fact that I would give it to her right in front of us, and then demanded she leave so I could buy it? Not only did he piss me off, he turned me off of Bond #9 right there on the spot. If that's how they tell their salespeople to sell to customers, then no. thank. you. I am not a moron, I can decide if I like something on my own. Don't tell me I like it. I'll kill you.
Most would not even view those as particularly judgmental statements... it's a cold northern place. Most people just say what they believe with little attention to political correctness. In general though, no blanket statements are true, and if that was your point, then fair enough. But overall, I spend lots of time in both Europe and America and there are huge differences in values, and the American ones (in my experience) seem to be more superficial. A perfume example: Americans are way more likely to buy a perfume created by a celebrity just because of that person's fame rather than the fragrance itself. I rarely see celebrity frags in Europe ever.
It's one funny story oolafsson! Yesterday I was Bloomingdale's and that so-called perfume expert guy there started handing me spritzed (thx for the word!) cards. The worst he was not telling me what the names of the perfumes were! I mean it was like "mm what is this called" and he was responding "oh did you like it?", damn it! I'm asking to see if it is one of crap perfumes that smells the same shit for only 1 hour and then flies away. It was also annoying that he was all mimicking terrible french accented "parfum" here and there. I mean he was pronouncing all other names like an american (homme -> home) but was saying "pahhfummm" replace h's with french r sound there. You even don't pronounce m at the end and the ending is not like "fume" it is a direct "fa" but whatever! i was angry because i felt like he wanted to sound like good at it while terribly doing the opposite. I don't care if he reads all the names like an american, it's ok, it's your language and culture but why are you smartassing me! So I totally understand and imagine "perfume guy" in an average department store here. I like Sephora here though but unfortunately their clientele is directly average perfume consumers so they don't carry a good variety. But they don't follow you everywhere and you can stay there trying all perfumes. This is what it should be. Wow anyway from samples to here, we had a lot to say about perfumes and americans here. But that's the way it is right
I agree with the Sephora thing. 5-10 years ago Sephora was a lot different; I felt like they had a lot of variety, but these days they definitely don't carry as much as they used to. I think they understand perfume though. Just give me some testers, strips, and a wall of perfumes, and I can decide for myself. I don't want to be patrolled by some fascist who is trying to force me to buy something when all I want to do is see what the damned thing smells like. It's completely unnecessary. If I want a detailed rundown of a fragrance, I'm fully capable of finding a sales representative on the floor and asking them. Sometimes I just want to sniff something for a couple of seconds and walk away. Department store representatives make you feel like you need to engage in a conversation about it, and then they slant the conversation in every way possible, trying to get you to admit it's a nice fragrance. Plenty of fragrances are pleasant, but *newsflash*, that doesn't mean I'm going to buy it right then and there.
Dorje, I don't think he mean to be rude. The opposite of what he said could be said in the same way to europeans. I've heard a lot from Americans me being so serious (maybe our humor is different?), so real, not having fun, not smiling (especially for french people). But it is obvious there is a huge cultural difference and this can be best seen in daily life such as buying something or shopping. Although I've had many good american friends, the average american (especially in Los Angles) is shockingly superficial, being always "nice" about things, as oolafsson said, sometimes hiding what they really think which later all start sickening you. But I know that not everyone the same and there are good and bad people in all countries. But I think these words should not be thought as "judgemental". I am sorry if I offended you but these are my humble opinions and I had to tell them
Last edited by shadow_shooter; 22nd December 2011 at 02:28 AM.
Very well said. I can't agree more. One thing about Sephora, I was looking for DHI a few days ago. I called one of their stores and the SA politely gave me the number of "their biggest store in California". I was amazed that I would finally be able to visit a place and try many different perfumes. I called the store to make sure and the lady asserted me "it's the biggest Sephora and we have a huge wall of perfumes". Well, they were right, the store was BIG but the variety was all the same! I mean they just put extra decor between shelves filling up that tremendous space but the selection was the same. I got disappointed. I mean, it's sad but true cosmetics can be bought from europe and electronics can be bought from here. But anyway...
I used to work in Denmark and have 2 sisters in Germany so I am well aware of the cultural differences. I much prefer working in Europe, mostly because of what you said about Americans hiding what they really think and putting work above family. Also, Europeans don't work as much. Some might consider Europeans lazy and rude because of that, but IMO that's not a constructive way to think about it. In the same way, interpreting American's behavior as greedy and superficial isn't constructive. Either way is looking at things in a negative, judgmental way. There are actually reasons behind what you consider superficial behavior, especially at work. We cannot get away with being as direct as most Europeans, if you want to keep your job... so most Americans are forced to smile and conceal opinions at times. That doesn't mean they are superficial, it's mostly about social convention. Believe me, I know... I worked for the Danes for a couple years and it was great. I lasted a matter of weeks when the project was transferred to Americans. My behavior was acceptable and normal in Denmark, but was seen as rude and confrontational in the US. So in general I agree with your assessment of Americans, but using blanket statement that come off as negative and judgmental isn't necessary.
Anyway, no big deal...
I just like honesty of your thoughts. Don't get me wrong but I've never seen an american who would/could talk the way you wrote here. So, your thoughts will definitely be a part of my experience here. I understand how hard it could be to express your true thoughts in a work setting here due to cultural differences but I guess this evidently and eventually shifts to real life interactions of people. I've even sensed this even in usual friendships. I think it is the effect of pavlov's dog. They learn not to expose their inner feelings openly. I mean at the end you get that "flat feeling" from americans that they don't care about things which happen around them. I think this bugs many people from Europe. but hey, if we chose to be here we should accept it as a part of our experience. This is what I've been doing and pretty sure it's valid for oolafssson. People like you, though amazingly rare, continue to improve my image of americans here. I'm glad you contributed with your own opinions here. They mean more to me than your first question here. Anyway BACK to perfumes, I think
That's a good point, I guess it depends on the crowd you keep company with... I tend to gravitate towards people that are similar to myself, or will tolerate me. I have not thought about the effect of millions of people putting on a fake smile for 40-50 hours a week might have on society, even more troubling is the lack of morality and ethical behavior in the business world. I admit I don't mix well with corporate America, for this exact reason. Maybe I need to move to Germany with my sister, it might suit me... plus I love European women.
on topic... my l'instant extreme should be here soon, I picked one up while it was still available, cost me $103 shipped. I should be able to pass it on with a minimal loss if I don't like it. I really don't have any frag even remotely like it, so I can't predict how I might like it. The reviews are overwhelmingly positive, more than I've ever seen I think... so maybe it will be worth the risk.
Not only there are cultural differences between places, but also distribution differences. : )
L'Instant de Guerlain pour Homme Eau Extreme is available at Guerlain counters here for around $87. I got two bottles (1 retail bottle & 1 tester) online (local seller) for less than $40 each.
I think one of the things that is so fascinating about this fragrance is that negative reviews of it are as hard to find as the fragrance itself.
Nothing negative to say, it is a great scent. But the EDT will do you just as good. I sprayed 3 sprays of this to the chest and one on the wrist today and it stays so close to the skin that i could barley smell it a few min later. Very minimal projection and sillage. I will try the same thing w the EDT tomorrow.
Want to trade - Chanel Platinum Egoiste for Dior Eau Sauvage...
Guy at Guerlain boutique says that they do not have a contract to import this from Guerlain France. He says that he is trying to prove to France that there is a market here. You can order a 1000ml flacon from him for $1800 though.....but he has to order 10 of those at a time and they have to be presold.......
Want to trade - Chanel Platinum Egoiste for Dior Eau Sauvage...
heperd can you update us with your impressions with edt? is it also staying very close to skin? Because I felt it was the opposite for me. the projection and longevity were really good but it was one spray so I'm not sure what it would be if I wore it completely


text:
640 South State StreetDover, Delaware 19901
21 West Clarke AvenueMilford, Delaware 19963
401 North Carter RoadSmyrna, DE 19977
640 S. State StreetDover DE 1990121 West Clarke AvenueMilford DE 19963
301 Jefferson AveMilford, DE 19963
1275 S. State StreetDover, Delaware 19901
Urea breath test, UBT
This is a breath test that checks for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a common infection. H. pylori bacteria are spread through contact with feces from an infected person. Many people get this infection during childhood. The bacteria often live in the stomach lining without causing any symptoms or problems. But for some people, these bacteria cause ulcers and other stomach irritations.
While they live in your stomach lining, H. pylori process urea, a natural compound in the body. As the bacteria process urea, they create ammonia and bicarbonate. Traces of these can be found in your breath, which is proof that H. pylori live in your body.
This test may be done if you have been treated for H. pylori and your doctor wants to know if the treatment worked. This test is the easiest way to find out if H. pylori are living in your stomach.
Your doctor might also order these tests:
Blood tests
Endoscopy, in which a narrow, lighted tube is put into your stomach through your mouth to look at the lining of your stomach and take out small samples for testing
Stool sample
A result for a lab test may be affected by many things, including the method the laboratory uses to do the test. If your test results are different from the normal value, you may not have a problem. To learn what the results mean for you, talk with your health care provider.
The urea breath test is accurate more than 95 percent of the time. If the test is positive, H. pylori is present. If it's negative, you likely do not have H. pylori in your stomach.
This test is usually done first thing in the morning. You will be asked to fast for six hours and then will be given a special meal to eat. You will also be given a drink or capsule that contains urea. This urea helps the lab figure out if you have H. pylori. Over the next hour, you will breathe into a special bag at certain times – for example, every 10 to 20 minutes. The air you breathe will be collected and analyzed for signs of H. pylori.
This test poses no risks.
If this test is done too soon after treatment, you could get a false-positive result. This means that the test could show that H. pylori are still present even though they are not. To get the best results, you should be retested at least four weeks after treatment for H. pylori.
Other factors that may affect results include:
Recent use of antibiotics
Recent use of bismuth
Recent use of proton pump inhibitors, or PPIs
The test is less accurate in young patients.
You must fast before this test. Ask your doctor how long you should not eat or drink before the test You will need to eat a meal that contains urea. This helps the lab find byproducts of urea after you digest it.
Be sure your doctor knows about all medicines, herbs, vitamins, and supplements you are taking. This includes medicines that don't need a prescription and any illicit drugs you may use. You may be asked to stop taking certain medicines before the test.


text:
Scarring - Rosacea
Repair Complex
Stimulates the repair of damaged skin. Actives reduce redness,...This product is not available online.In stock -
10% Vitamin C
Repairs and protects sun damaged skin. Corrects signs of aging to...$85.00 -
Dual Advantage Cream
A cream designed to help control blemishes and fade the residual...$36.00


text:
Toyota Personal Mobility (PM) Concept
Tuesday November 4, 2003: Toyota revealed its radical vision for the future of single-person transport at the Tokyo Motor Show. Drive-by-wire navigation, interactive communications via a holographic display and the ability to change shape according to speed or autonomously follow other vehicles are among the innovations showcased in the PM concept.(short for Personal Mobility and visual communications system). The PM is part of an emerging class of vehicle that takes single-person transport - dominated by the motorcycle throughout the 20th century - in a radically new direction. The other notable vehicle in this category is the Hermes concept featured in Gizmo 4, which shares the PM's ability to shift posture during transit to best suit the function.
« Back to Toyota Personal Mobility (PM) Concept
Related Articles
- Features
- Reviews
- Aircraft
- Architecture
- Around The Home
- Automotive
- Bicycles
- Children
- Computers
- Digital Cameras
- Electronics
- Environment
- Games
- Good Thinking
- Health and Wellbeing
- Holiday Destinations
- Home Entertainment
- Inventors and Remarkable People
- Laptops
- Marine
- Medical
- Military
- Mobile Technology
- Motorcycles
- Music
- Outdoors
- Pets
- Robotics
- Science
- Space
- Sports
- Telecommunications
- Urban Transport
- Wearable Electronics


text:
Now that Utah's favorite son Mitt Romney is no longer a candidate for president, "undecided" is the top choice of the state's Republicans in the party's 2016 nomination race.
Top Romney adviser courts challenger to US Sen. Mike Lee
The Associated Press |
posted 6 minutes ago
Spencer Zwick, who remains one of Mitt Romney's closest advisers after being his top fundraiser in the 2012 presidential race, is courting a challenger to U.S. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah.
Absent Clinton, South Carolina Democrats welcome liberals
Bill Barrow, Associated Press |
posted Apr 25th - 3:20pm
Call it the Clinton conundrum.
Herbert, legislative leaders to DC to talk Medicaid
Dennis Romboy |
posted Apr 25th - 10:25am
Gov. Gary Herbert and Republican legislative leaders are scheduled to meet with Obama administration officials in Washington, D.C., next week to talk about Medicaid expansion.
Hillary Clinton plans campaign trip to Nevada
Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press |
posted Apr 24th - 8:11pm
Hillary Rodham Clinton will travel to Nevada next month, adding it to the roster of early-voting states she is visiting at the beginning of her presidential campaign.
$35K grant to UNR for Latino journalism project
The Associated Press |
posted Apr 24th - 12:41pm
The University of Nevada's journalism school is teaming up with the Reno Gazette-Journal and KNPB public broadcasting to develop bilingual news coverage serving northern Nevada's Latino community ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's wife leaves Wall Street job
The Associated Press |
posted Apr 24th - 11:01am
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's wife has left her lucrative job at a Wall Street firm as her husband prepares for a potential run for the White House.
Presidential contender Marco Rubio seeks support in Iowa
Catherine Lucey, Associated Press |
posted Apr 24th - 10:53am
He's offering himself as a new generation of leader, but Sen. Marco Rubio is still respecting an old presidential campaign tradition: courting caucus goers in the kickoff state of Iowa.
Not long ago, Rubio questioned his readiness for presidency
Brendan Farrington, Associated Press |
posted Apr 24th - 8:31am
Marco Rubio lacks the experience to be president and Jeb Bush is a brilliant man ready for the job. So said Marco Rubio.
Poll shows most Utahns in favor of tax hike for transportation needs
Katie McKellar |
posted Apr 24th - 7:47am
Nearly 55 percent of Utahns say they would lean toward voting for a local sales tax increase for transportation needs, according to a new UtahPolicy.com poll.
Most Popular
1. Utah group in Nepal stunned by violent ...
2. Couple married 74 years dies hours apart ...
3. Enchanting photos of girl with Down ...
4. Nepal quake: Nearly 1,400 dead, Everest ...
5. Fines, returned wages ordered for Utah ...
6. Pick 6 leads white team to 12-0 victory ...
7. Poll: Utah Republicans widely undecided ...
8. WVC leaders oppose officer's ...
9. Former wrestlers charged, assistant ...
10. First concert announced for Ogden ...
Site Index
KSL's Children's Television Programming Reports, as well as its FCC public inspection file, are available for viewing during regular office hours at the KSL Broadcast House or online.
The station representative who can assist a person with disabilities with issues related to the content of the public files is Mike Dowdle, available during regular office hours at firstname.lastname@example.com and (801) 575-5555.
The station representative who can assist a person with disabilities with issues related to the content of the public files is Mike Dowdle, available during regular office hours at email@example.com and (801) 575-5555.
© 2015 KSL.com | KSL Broadcasting Salt Lake City UT | Site hosted & managed by Deseret Digital Media - a Deseret Media Company v04


text:
SPEEDO Boys' Lycra Jammer
Eligible for $20 Off Your Purchase of $100 or More! (see promotion details) |
Eligible Free Shipping on Outerwear, Shoes, Clothes! (see promotion details) |
Eligible for Free Shipping on Orders $49 or More! (see promotion details) |
Members of The League get 5% back when you spend $100! (see promotion details) |
Product Details
This SPEEDO® Lycra boys' jammer is made with Xtra-Life Lycra® spandex that resists damage caused by chlorine, suntan lotions and skin oils 5 to 10 times longer than ordinary spandex. This sleek jammer is comfortably secured at the waist with an interior non-slip drawstring and features reinforced stitching for a longer-lasting life.
Get your new SPEEDO® jammer today from Sports Authority.
- Shell: 74% nylon, 26% Xtra-Life Lycra® spandex
- Liner: 86% nylon, 14% Xtra-Life Lycra® spandex
- Front liner/gusset
- Classic SPEEDO® styling with Xtra-Life Lycra® spandex that provides enhanced shape retention and more resistance to suntan lotions, skin oils and chlorine
- Interior non-slip drawstring at the waist
- SPEEDO® heat transfer logo on right leg
- Made in Mexico
Product Recommendations
Product Reviews
Reviewed by 2 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-2
Best Uses
Comments about SPEEDO Boys' Lycra Jammer:
It is for little boy. My son is very skinny but can not squeeze in. I should buy youth one hoping there is.
- Sizing:
- Feels too small
- Comfortable
- Quality Materials
- Washes Well
- Well Made
- Wrinkle Resistant
Best Uses
- Swim Team
Comments about SPEEDO Boys' Lycra Jammer:
We purchased these Speedo Jammers for my 6 year old son. It was his first year on a swim team and they had meets evey Saturday. These were perfect! After I returned them once because I didn't understand the sizes plus my son is skinny!! They never faded and did not stretch out at al. The drawstring never came out either, another PRO.
- Sizing:
- Feels true to size
- Comfort vs Style:
- Style Driven
- Was this a gift?:
- No
Displaying reviews 1-2


text:
California Proposition 32, the "Paycheck Protection" Initiative (2012)
Proposition 32 | |
Click here for the latest news on U.S. ballot measures | |
Quick stats | |
Type: | State statute |
Referred by: | Petition signatures |
Topic: | Paycheck protection |
Status: | On the ballot |
If approved, Proposition 32 will:
- Ban both corporate and union contributions to state and local candidates
- Ban contributions by government contractors to the politicians who control contracts awarded to them
- Ban automatic deductions by corporations, unions, and government of employees' wages to be used for politics
A similar proposition, Proposition 75, was on the 2005 ballot. Proposition 226, on the 1998 ballot, also sought to enact paycheck protection.[2]
Election results
- See also: 2012 ballot measure election results
LIVE election results will be posted when polls close on November 6, 2012 and when numbers start to roll in.
California Proposition 32 | ||||
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Result not yet known |
Jerry Brown signed SB 202 on October 7, 2011. SB 202 mandates that elections on ballot propositions can take place only in the state's November general elections. This changes a 50-year tradition in the state, begun in 1960, of voting on ballot propositions on the June primary ballot as well as the November general election ballot.[3]
Several pundits speculated that Brown and the Democratic members of the California State Legislature who sponsored SB 202 were moved to action by the Paycheck Protection Initiative, and the possibility that it would gain a spot on the June 5, 2012 primary ballot in the state.
- According to Bill Whalen, "...before Brown's intervention, one such conservative idea – a big one – was headed for a showdown in June 2012: weakening Big Labor's clout by preventing unions from collecting dues for political purposes without a worker's annual consent. [Under SB 202], that gets moved to November."[4]
- Dan Walters, a leading political journalist in the state, said, "Everyone knows that passing SB 202 was to diminish chances that voters would pass a so-called "paycheck protection" measure that would eat into unions' ability to gather campaign funds from public employees – money that almost always goes to Democrats."[5]
Thad Kousser, a political-science professor at UC San Diego, says that the Paycheck Protection Initiative could have a strong impact on the public sector (government employee) unions in the state: "Defeating this has got to be the top goal of labor. If they don't, they could become almost extinct in California politics."[6]
Text of measure
Note: The original title given to Proposition 32 by election officials during the petition circulation stage was, "Prohibits Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction. Prohibitions on Contributions to Candidates. Initiative Statute."
- See also: Proposition 32 lawsuits
Proposition 32's ballot label has gone through three versions. The third and final version was given to it by a Sacramento County Superior Court Judge on August 13, 2012.[7]
The final label is:
- "Prohibits unions from using payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. Applies same use prohibition to payroll deductions, if any, by corporations or government contractors. Prohibits union and corporate contributions to candidates and their committees. Prohibits government contractor contributions to elected officers or their committees."
The second version, given to Proposition 32 after it qualified for the ballot, said:
- "Restricts union political fundraising by prohibiting use of payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. Applies same use restrictions to payroll deductions, if any, by corporations or government contractors. Prohibits union and corporate contributions to candidates and their committees. Prohibits government contractor contributions to elected officers or their committees."
The original version given to Proposition 32 by election officials during the petition circulation stage was:
- "Restricts union political fundraising by prohibiting use of payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. Same use restriction would apply to payroll deductions, if any, by corporations or government contractors. Permits voluntary employee contributions to employer or union committees if authorized yearly, in writing. Prohibits unions and corporations from contributing directly or indirectly to candidates and candidate-controlled committees. Other political expenditures remain unrestricted, including corporate expenditures from available resources not limited by payroll deduction prohibition. Limits government contractor contributions to elected officers or officer-controlled committees."
Estimated fiscal impact
(This is a summary of the initiative's estimated "fiscal impact on state and local government" prepared by the California Legislative Analyst's Office and the Director of Finance.)
Increased costs to state and local government—potentially exceeding $1 million annually—to implement and enforce the measure's requirements. |
The estimated fiscal impact in the voter guide differs from the fiscal statement that was originally provided by election officials to Proposition 32 when it was in the petition circulation stage. That fiscal statement said, "Increased state implementation and enforcement costs of up to hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, potentially offset in part by revenues from fines."
- The main campaign supporting the measure is YES on 32, Stop Special Interest Money Now!
The arguments in favor of Proposition 32 in the state's official voter guide were submitted by:
- Gloria Romero. Romero is the state director of Democrats for Education Reform. She is also a former California state senator.
- Gabriella Holt. Holt is the president of Citizens for California Reform.
- John Kabateck. Kabateck is the executive director of the California chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business.
- Marian Bergeson. Bergeson is a former California Secretary of Education.
- Jon Coupal. Coupal is the president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.
- The Hon. John Arguelles. Arguelles is a retired justice of the California Supreme Court.
Other supporters include:
- Former U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz. He says, "This initiative gets to the heart of one of the most corrosive elements in politics: campaign contributions...For too long, special interest money has dominated our politics, muting the voice of average Californians."[8]
- Richard Riordan, a former mayor of Los Angeles.[9]
Arguments in favor
The arguments presented in favor of Proposition 32 in the state's official voter guide include:
- "Politicians take millions in campaign contributions from corporations and government unions and then vote the way those special interests tell them. Politicians end up working for special interests, not voters. The result: massive budget deficits and abuses like lavish pensions and bad teachers we can't fire."
- "Special interests have spent tens of millions of dollars to prevent Prop. 32 from cutting the money tie between them and politicians. They'll say anything to protect the status quo. They've invented a false, bogus, red-herring argument: They claim Prop. 32 has a loophole to benefit the wealthy and corporations to fund independent PACs. The fact is both unions and corporations fund independent political committees protected by the Constitution that cannot be banned."
- "Politicians hold big-ticket, lavish fundraisers at country clubs, wine tastings and cigar smokers. Fat-cat lobbyists attend these fundraisers and hand over tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions. Most happen when hundreds of bills are up for votes, allowing politicians and special interests to trade favors: Giving multi-million dollar tax loopholes to big developers, wealthy movie producers and out-of-state corporations; exempting contributors from the state's environmental rules; handing out sweetheart pension deals for government workers; protecting funding for wasteful programs like the high-speed train to nowhere, even as they are cutting funds for schools and law enforcement while proposing higher taxes."
- "Stops special interests from taking political deductions from employee paychecks to guarantee every dollar given for politics is strictly voluntary. Prop. 32 will ensure that California workers have the right to decide how to spend the money they earn. They shouldn't be coerced to contribute to politicians or causes they disagree with."
- "Today, it is legal for politicians to give contracts to political donors, shutting out small businesses in the process. Prop. 32 will end this special treatment and the waste it causes, like a $95 million state computer system that didn't work."
Other arguments in favor of Proposition 32 include:
- According to Jake Suski, a spokesperson for the "yes" campaign, "This initiative is exclusively about the stranglehold that special interests have had over California's political system and whether voters are ready to demand reform. Voters are demanding reform and change. They're willing to do something, to say no to special interests."[9]
- The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal writes, "If California voters hope to stand a chance of reining in such benefits and fixing their dysfunctional state, they'll have to break the government union political monopoly this November."[11]
- Margaret A. Bengs, a former spokeswoman for state agencies, says, "It is well known that big public employee unions and other special interests have an inordinate control over California government, control that stymies badly needed reforms."[12]
Total campaign cash as of November 3, 2012 | |
Support: | $60,500,000 |
Opposition: | $73,300,000 |
As of November 3, 2012, the "yes" campaign has raised about $60.5 million. That amount includes well over $40 million in contributions to a joint campaign committee (the Small Business Action Committee) that is simultaneously opposing Proposition 30 and supporting Proposition 32.[13][14]
The donors listed in the chart below are the $100,000 and over donors to the "Yes on 32" campaign as of Saturday, November 3, 2012. Note that some of these donors gave their money to a committee that is simultaneously supporting or opposing more than one of the ballot propositions on the November 6, 2012, ballot. When that is the case, it is not generally possible to break down how much of that donor's money specifically was spent on the campaign for a particular proposition. Those contributions are listed below with shading; readers should not assume that all or even most of a donation to a multi-purpose committee will be used for expenditures related to this particular proposition.
Donor | Amount |
Charles Munger, Jr. | $36,067,204 |
Americans for Responsible Leadership | $11,000,000 |
American Future Fund | $4,080,000 |
Jerry Perenchio | $1,300,000 |
William Oberndorf | $1,100,000 |
Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. | $520,000 |
Margaret Bloomfield | $500,000 |
Thomas M. Siebel | $500,000 |
John Scully | $500,000 |
New Majority California PAC | $350,000 |
William Bloomfield, Jr. | $300,000 |
John Murray Pasquesi | $300,000 |
Larry Smith | $260,701 |
Citizen Power Campaign | $230,317 |
B. Wayne Hughes | $200,000 |
Lincoln Club of Orange County | $218,633 |
William Oberndorf | $150,000 |
Protect Prop 13 (HJTA) | $125,000 |
Robert J. Oster | $101,000 |
Frank E. Baxter | $100,000 |
Timothy C. Draper | $100,000 |
William L. Edwards | $100,000 |
Howard Leach | $100,000 |
Charles B. Johnson | $100,000 |
- The main campaign against the measure is No on 32, Stop the Special Exemptions Act.
The arguments against Proposition 32 in the state's official voter guide were submitted by:
- Jennifer A. Waggoner. Waggoner is the president of the League of Women Voters of California.
- Derek Cressman. Cressman is the regional director of California Common Cause.[15]
- Dan Stanford. Stanford is a former chairperson of the California Fair Political Practices Commission.
- Jo Seidita. Seidita is the chair of the California Clean Money Campaign.
- John Burton. Burton is the chairperson of the California Democratic Party.
- Robbie Hunter. Hunter is the executive secretary of the Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council.
Other opponents include:
- The California Labor Federation[1]
- Dave Low, the executive director of the California School Employees Association[16]
- California Common Cause[17]
- California League of Women Voters[17]
- The California Democratic Party[18]
Arguments against
The arguments in opposition to Proposition 32 presented in the state's official voter guide include:
- "Proposition 32 is not what it seems. Prop. 32 promises 'political reform' but is really designed by special interests to help themselves and harm their opponents."
- "Business Super PACs and independent expenditure committees are exempt from Prop. 32's controls. These organizations work to elect or defeat candidates and ballot measures but aren't subject to the same contribution restrictions and transparency requirements for campaigns themselves. A recent Supreme Court decision allows these groups to spend unlimited amounts of money. Prop. 32 does nothing to deal with that. If Prop. 32 passes, Super PACs, including committees backed by corporate special interests, will become the major way campaigns are funded. These groups have already spent more than $95,000,000 in California elections since 2004. Our televisions will be flooded with even more negative advertisements."
- "Real campaign reform treats everyone equally, with no special exemptions for anyone. Proposition 32 was intentionally written to exempt thousands of big businesses like Wall Street investment firms, hedge funds, developers, and insurance companies. Over 1000 of the companies exempted by this measure are listed as Major Donors by the California Secretary of State. They have contributed more than $10,000,000 to political campaigns, just since 2009."
- "This measure says it prohibits unions from using payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. It says it also applies to corporations, so it sounds balanced. But 99% of California corporations don't use payroll deductions for political giving; they would still be allowed to use their profits to influence elections."
- "Some say 'this is unbalanced but it's a step forward.' Here's the problem with that. Restricting unions and their workers while not stopping corporate special interests will result in a political system that favors corporate special interests over everyone else."
Other arguments against Proposition 32 include:
- Art Pulaski, executive secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation, says, "It's not enough for them to have taken our houses and it's not enough for them to make millions off the TARP funding and federal government support for the banks, now they want even more. They want us to not even have a voice in politics whatsoever."[1]
- Columnist Thomas Elias says, the "initiative's ban on contributions to candidate-controlled committees is meaningless, merely a cover for another blatant attempt to reduce funds for liberal candidates while letting contributions to conservatives continue unfettered."[19]
- Ron Lind, the president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 5, says, "The measure is a wolf in sheep's clothing designed to fool voters into approving a corporate power grab that will lead to even more corporate influence over our political system. What the backers won't say publicly is that they've written a giant loophole to allow for unlimited corporate spending on campaigns while furthering their real agenda of silencing the voices of middle-class workers and their unions."[20]
- State representative Linda Sanchez says, "This paycheck deception is the No. 1 target to silence the voices of hard-working families, and it's a crime."[21]
- State representative Judy Chu says, "This is the most dangerous proposition of all time. It will silence the union members and their voices."[21]
- Trudy Schafer of the California League of Women Voters says, "It promises political reform but it's really designed by its special interest backers to help themselves and harm their opponents."[17]
Total campaign cash as of October 27, 2012 | |
Support: | $59,400,000 |
Opposition: | $68,800,000 |
It was predicted early on that the state's public sector (government employee) unions would provide up to $28 million to the campaign to defeat Proposition 32. By late September, however, the level of giving to the "no" campaign soared past that early estimate.[6][13],[14] The Sacramento Bee reports, "Now, on the heels of an election that saw unions handed a major defeat last week in Wisconsin, the opposing camps in California soon will launch a campaign battle likely to consume $50 million or more in political spending."[9]
According to Dan Morain, the state's public employee unions may find themselves torn between funding the campaign to defeat the Paycheck Protection Initiative and funding the campaign to pass the Proposition 30 (the Jerry Brown/"Millionaire's Tax" initiative). Morain says, "To help fund the campaign, Brown needs the help of organized labor. But unions will be busy trying to kill a separate initiative promoted by conservatives that would strip them of their ability to raise and spend money on campaigns."[22]
This is a list of the $100,000 and over donors to the "no" campaign as of October 27, 2012:[23]
Donor | Amount |
California Teachers Association | $20,961,399 |
SEIU/California State Council of Service Employees | $13,066,090 |
California Labor Federation (AFL-CIO/Change to Win) | $5,935,374 |
California Professional Firefighters | $2,978,635 |
Democratic State Central Committee of California | $2,689,996 |
California School Employees Association | $1,730,987 |
California Faculty Association | $1,664,238 |
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers | $1,525,000 |
Peace Officers Research Association of California PAC | $1,524,846 |
California/American Federation of Teachers | $1,000,500 |
International Association of Firefighters | $500,000 |
Professional Engineers in California Government | $500,000 |
Thomas Steyer | $500,000 |
California Statewide Law Enforcement Association | $426,552 |
California State Pipe Trades Council | $250,000 |
Los Angeles Police Protective League's Public Safety First PAC | $250,000 |
Peace Officers Research Association | $250,000 |
Million More Voters (AFL-CIO) | $245,516 |
Northern California District Council of Laborers' Issues | $150,000 |
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California | $129,718 |
United Transportation Union | $105,000 |
San Bernardino County Safety Employees' Benefit Association | $100,000 |
John Perez Ballot Measure Committee | $100,000 |
United Domestic Workers of America | $100,000 |
Union of American Physicians & Dentists | $100,000 |
California Association of Psychiatric Technicians | $100,000 |
Political consultant Gale Kaufman is managing the opposition campaign. She ran the campaign against a similar measure, Proposition 226 in 1998.[6],[24]
Editorial opinion
"Yes on 32"
- The Appeal-Democrat: "Proposition 32 on the Nov. 6 ballot would reduce the unions' indirectly tax-fueled influence by prohibiting union contributions to state and local candidates."[25]
- The Bakersfield Californian: "Prop. 32 won't fix everything in Sacramento. But the measure does ensure that unions, one of the most powerful groups in the Capitol, are deriving their funds in a fair way from informed members."[26]
- The Long Beach Press Telegram: [27]
- The Los Angeles Daily News: "Unions will still have the power of numbers. Their members will continue to be able to mobilize in support of candidates and political stands, and to donate money on their own, but it would be their decision."[28]
- The North County Times: "Proposition 32 corrects that imbalance while doing nothing to stifle unions' political voices -- despite claims to the contrary. Prop. 32 simply institutes an opt-in system for each employee's political donations."[29]
- The Orange County Register: "Anyone familiar with California politics knows that the most powerful forces, by far, in the state Capitol are the public-employee unions. Their clout was demonstrated this year when the California Teachers Association, the most powerful of them all, killed Senate Bill 1530, which would have made it easier to fire bad teachers for actions 'that involve certain sex offenses, controlled-substance offenses or child abuse offenses.' SB1530 was not concocted by a conservative Republican, but by state Sen. Alex Padilla of Los Angeles, a liberal Democrat. The bill advanced after several cases of teacher abuse against children came to light, especially a disgusting scenario allegedly involving Los Angeles Unified School District teacher Mark Berndt. The bill passed overwhelmingly in the state Senate, 33-4. Then the CTA killed it in the Assembly Education Committee."[30]
- The Press-Enterprise: "The meat of Prop. 32 is a ban on the use of payroll deductions to finance political spending. That provision targets one of the largest special interests in California politics: public employee unions. Automatic deductions from paychecks are the primary way unions fund political campaigns — and ending that financing mechanism would ease unions' stranglehold on political decisions."[31]
- The Redding Record Searchlight: "Nothing in Proposition 32 would stop unions from holding fundraisers, from asking members to write a check to support a good cause or candidate — from raising money just like any other political advocate. It would, however, slow the river of money that has drowned independent thinkers in Sacramento."[32]
- The San Bernardino Sun: "The complaint that Proposition 32 is unfair because it will affect unions more than corporations falls flat. It's less common than one might think that unions and corporations act as counterweights on political issues. It's more like they are the upper and lower jaws of the monster that ate good government."[33]
- The San Diego Union-Tribune: "Of all the measures on the California ballot this fall, the most important is Proposition 32. It has the potential to change the balance of power in state and local governments in a hugely constructive way. How? By limiting the power of California's unions, the 21st-century version of the railroad companies that were so perniciously powerful a century ago that Gov. Hiram Johnson established direct democracy so voters could overrule a state Capitol in thrall to one interest group."[34]
- The San Gabriel Valley Tribune: "To understand the need for Proposition 32, all a voter has to do is look at the the vast sums of cash pouring into the campaign against it. A total of more than $50 million has been donated to the 'yes' and 'no' campaigns. Of that, the vast majority has gone to fund advertising for the 'no' side. And of that, most has come from unions representing California teachers and other public employees."[35]
"No on 32"
- The Bay Area Reporter: "This is an anti-labor measure concocted by southern California conservatives under the guise of campaign finance reform."[36]
- The Contra Costa Times: "If Proposition 32 did what supporters claim -- limit all special-interest money from corrupting the political system -- we would race to endorse it. It doesn't. It actually tilts the political playing field in favor of the wealthy and corporations."[37]
- The Daily Democrat (Woodland, California): "This initiative is a power play to limit campaign influence of labor unions without commensurate checks on political contributions by corporations."[38]
- The Fresno Bee: "Our recommendation to reject Prop. 32 is not a vote of confidence for public employee unions. We have regularly criticized their heavy-handed tactics. They have overreached too often and have too much clout with too many Democrats. Lawmakers should take action to make it easier for employees who disagree with union politics to opt out of making campaign donations."[39]
- The Lompoc Record: "In that sense, Prop. 32 is little more than another layer of regulation, riddled with loopholes, and would end up costing taxpayers a significant sum that the state would have to spend to enforce the new election provisions."[40]
- The Los Angeles Times: "Proposition 32 is a deceptive measure that would disproportionately weaken some special interests while leaving others essentially unaffected. Those who have seen its list of backers will not be surprised to learn that it would have a devastating effect on labor unions' political fundraising efforts and only a trivial impact on corporate spending."[41]
- The Marin Independent Journal: "While unions rely on payroll deductions to build their campaign war chests, corporations don't. Proposition 32 tilts the playing field for corporations, who have proven they have little trouble raising and spending money on politics."[42]
- The Merced Sun-Star: "Proposition 32 would ban unions and corporations from using automatic paycheck deductions to raise money for political purposes. That might sound reasonable, except that it's loaded. Unions rely on payroll deductions, corporations do not."[43]
- The Modesto Bee:[44]
- The Sacramento Bee: "Our recommendation to reject Proposition 32 is not a vote of confidence for public employee unions. They have overreached too often and have too much clout with too many Democrats. Lawmakers should take action to make it easier for employees who disagree with union politics to opt out of making campaign donations. But Proposition 32 would tilt the system in favor of corporations and business trade groups."[45]
- The San Francisco Bay Guardian: "This is by far the most dangerous and deceptive measure on the ballot, one that threatens to cripple the ability of labor unions to engage meaningfully in the political process."[46]
- The San Francisco Chronicle: "Proposition 32 purports to be an even-handed attempt to reduce the influence of special interests in California. It is anything but balanced ... Organized labor has made defeat of Prop. 32 its highest priority in California because of what is unquestionably its most consequential element: A prohibition on the use of payroll deductions for political purposes."[47]
- The San Jose Mercury News: "It actually tilts the political playing field in favor of the wealthy and corporations."[48]
- The Santa Cruz Sentinel: "And while we've editorialized against the influence of unions on lawmakers in this state, and for how their bankrolling liberal Democrats has kept meaningful pension, education, government efficiency and budget reforms stalled, in this case, we reluctantly agree this measure has too many flaws, and urge voters to reject Prop. 32."[49]
- The Ventura County Star: "This measure claims to be aimed at cleaning up politics by clamping new restrictions on contributions. In reality, it amounts to a cynical ploy because it ignores some of the biggest problems of money in politics while putting handcuffs only on the political opponents of some of the measure's biggest backers."[50]
Polling information
- See also: Polls, 2012 ballot measures
A Field Poll on Proposition 32 was conducted between September 6 and September 18.[51]
The Public Policy Institute of California polled Proposition 32 for the first time in mid-September.[52]
Date of Poll | Pollster | In favor | Opposed | Undecided | Number polled |
September 9-16, 2012 | PPIC | 42% | 49% | 9% | 2,003 |
September 6-18, 2012 | Field Poll | 38% | 44% | 18% | 1,183 |
September 17-23, 2012 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 36% | 44% | 20% | 1,504 |
October 7-10, 2012 | California Business Roundtable | 51.4% | 38.3% | 10.3% | 830 |
October 11-15, 2012 | Reason-Rupe | 45% | 48% | 7% | 696 |
October 14-21, 2012 | PPIC | 39% | 53% | 7% | 2,006 |
October 21-28, 2012 | California Business Roundtable | 44.7% | 44.8% | 10.5% | 2,115 |
October 17-30, 2012 | Field Poll | 34% | 50% | 16% | 1,912 |
Path to the ballot
- See also: California signature requirements
- A letter requesting a title and summary for the proposed initiative was signed by Ashlee N. Titus, and was received by the Attorney General of California's office on April 1, 2011.
- To earn a spot on the state's 2012 ballot, sponsors of the initiative were required to collect 504,760 signatures by October 24, 2011.
- They submitted approximately 900,000 signatures to county election officials on October 7.[8]
- On December 6, 2011, the California Secretary of State announced that the proposition was certified for the ballot.
- See also: List of ballot measure lawsuits in 2012
Supporters and opponents of Proposition 32 filed lawsuits seeking to alter the official ballot text that will appear in the state's official voter guide. The official voter guide comes in an online version and is also mailed to every registered voter in the state.[53]
The court ruled partly in favor and partly against the lawsuit filed by Proposition 32 supporters. The court altogether denied the request of Proposition 32's opponents.[53]
Ashlee Titus v. Debra Bowen[7]
Ashlee Titus v. Debra Bowen is the lawsuit filed by Proposition 32 supporters. They asked the court to do two things; the court agreed with them on one request.[7]
- First, Titus asked that the court change the state's official summary/label. The court agreed with this request.
The old ballot summary said:
- "Restricts union political fundraising by prohibiting use of payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. Applies same use restrictions to payroll deductions, if any, by corporations or government contractors. Prohibits union and corporate contributions to candidates and their committees. Prohibits government contractor contributions to elected officers or their committees."
The new, court-ordered summary/label, with deleted text shown in strike-out text and added language shown in italics, says:
- "
RestrictsProhibits unions from using payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. Applies same userestrictionsprohibition to payroll deductions, if any, by corporations or government contractors.RestrictsProhibits union and corporate contributions to candidates and their committees.LimitsProhibits government contractor contributions to elected officers or their committees.
The key change was to the consistent use of "prohibits", rather than "restricts". In their lawsuit, according to "Yes on 32" campaign spokesperson Jake Suski, the use of the word "restrict", which was the word chosen by the Attorney General of California, was misleading. Suski said, "Voters deserve to be informed that Prop. 32 doesn't just reduce direct contributions from corporations and unions to politicians, it eliminates them entirely."[53] After the lower court's ruling came out, Kamala Harris, the Attorney General of California, went to a higher level court and filed a petition asking for immediate review of the lower court's decision. This request was denied.[54]
"Yes on 32" supporters made an additional request of the court. This second request was denied. This was a request to have the phrase "Other political expenditures remain unrestricted, including corporate expenditures from available resources not limited by payroll deduction prohibition" removed from the state's official materials.
Lou Paulson v. Debra Bowen[55]
Lou Paulson v. Debra Bowen is the lawsuit filed by the "No on 32" campaign. Their request to the court was denied.[55]
The "No on 32" campaign's lawsuit challenged ballot language they believed might mislead voters about whether payroll deductions could still occur if a worker provided the state with written permission when in fact, under the provisions of Proposition 32, the state cannot engage in the practice of payroll deductions regardless of whether or not a worker gives permission.[53]
External links
Basic information:
- Complete November 6, 2012 official voter guide
- Ballot title, summary and LAO analysis of Proposition 32
- Arguments for and against Proposition 32 in the official state voter guide
- Letter requesting a ballot title for Initiative 11-0010
- Living Voters Guide to Proposition 32
- Proposition 32, an overview prepared by the League of Women Voters of California
- Proposition 32 on Voter's Edge
- Proposition 32 Cheatsheet from KCET
- Proposition 32 on California Choices (sponsored by Next 10, IGS at UC Berkeley, the UC San Diego Political Science Department, the Bill Lane Center for the American West at Stanford, and the Center for CA Studies at Sac State)
- Proposition 32 at the California Voter Foundation
- "Stop Special Interest Money Now", website advocating in favor of Proposition 32
- Yes on Proposition 32 (twitter)
- Yes on Proposition 32 (Facebook)
- Campaign finance reports for "Yes on 32; Stop Special Interest Money Now
- Campaign finance reports for "Californians Against Special Interests
- Campaign finance reports for the "Citizen Power Campaign"
- No on Proposition 32 website
- No on Proposition 32 (twitter)
- No on Proposition 32 (Facebook)
- Campaign finance reports for "No on 32; Sponsored by Educators, Firefighters (Etc.)
- Campaign finance reports for the "International Association of Firefighters/No on 32"
- Campaign finance reports for "Los Angeles Police Protective League/No on 32"
- Campaign finance reports for "Californians for Good Jobs; Yes on 30/No on 32"
- Campaign finance reports for "Students and Families of California; Yes on 30/No on 32"
- Campaign finance reports for "Asian Pacific Environmental Network; Yes on 30/No on 32"
Additional reading:
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Business Week, "Measure to curb union, corporate clout qualifies", December 8, 2011
- ↑ Human Events, "Paycheck Protection Makes a California Comeback", October 19, 2011
- ↑ KCRA, "At 100, California Direct Democracy Gets Facelift", October 10, 2011
- ↑ Ricochet, "California's Initiative Process Turns 100", October 10, 2011
- ↑ Sacramento Bee, "California politicians use power to fix the ballot game", January 30, 2012
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Mercury News, "High-stakes labor battle coming to California", January 30, 2012
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Superior Court of the State of California County of Sacramento, "Ashlee Titus v. Debra Bowen"
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Sacramento Bee, "Backers of 'paycheck protection' measure submit signatures", October 7, 2011
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Sacramento Bee, "Unions will start spending millions to tout message about Calif. campaign donation ballot measure", June 9, 2012
- ↑ Walnut Creek Patch, "California Republicans Oppose Proposed Tax Measures", August 12, 2012
- ↑ Wall Street Journal, "California's Public Union Referendum", August 10, 2012
- ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Viewpoints: Prop. 32 is a small check on special interests", August 11, 2012
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Sacramento Bee, "Unions give $500,000 to oppose 'paycheck' ballot measure", May 22, 2012
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Sacramento Bee, "Firefighters group gives $1 million to fight campaign finance measure", July 6, 2012
- ↑ Los Angeles Times, "Good-government groups call Proposition 32 deceptive", July 23, 2012
- ↑ Sacramento Bee, "'Reform' initiative wears a soiled white hat", December 22, 2011
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Contra Costa Times, "Union political donation ballot measure questioned", July 23, 2012
- ↑ Walnut Patch, "Democratic Party Picks State Ballot Measures to Support", July 30, 2012
- ↑ Redding Record-Searchlight, "One-sided 'paycheck protection'", February 26, 2012
- ↑ Mercury News, "Ron Lind: Special interest ballot measure really is just anti-union", March 2, 2012
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 San Gabriel Valley Tribune, "Teamsters rally against ballot initiative in El Monte", April 14, 2012
- ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Dan Morain: The heat is on Jerry Brown and the Democrats", June 10, 2012
- ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Unions Kick in another $1.1 million to defeat Proposition 32", August 10, 2012
- ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Californians to Watch: Campaign consultant Gale Kaufman makes labor's case to voters", December 27, 2011
- ↑ Appeal-Democrat, "Our View: Yes on Prop. 32 – union dues", October 6, 2012
- ↑ Bakersfield Californian, "Yes on 32: Check undue union influence", October 6, 2012
- ↑ Long Beach Press Telegram, "Endorsement: Yes on Proposition 32 -- Unions have inordinate amount of power in state politics", October 9, 2012
- ↑ Los Angeles Daily News, "Yes on Proposition 32 -- Unions have inordinate amount of power in state politics", October 9, 2012
- ↑ North County Times, "Yes on 32", September 19, 2012
- ↑ Orange County Register, "Editorial: Yes on Prop. 32 (unions)", October 3, 2012
- ↑ Press-Enterprise, "Yes on 32", October 10, 2012
- ↑ Redding Record Searchlight, "Editorial: Prop. 32 would restore balance to Sacramento", September 29, 2012
- ↑ San Bernardino Sun, "Prop. 32 would bring culture change to Sacramento", October 9, 2012
- ↑ San Diego Union-Tribune, "Yes on 32: Break the union stranglehold", October 5, 2012
- ↑ San Gabriel Valley Tribune, "Our View: Curb union power", October 9, 2012
- ↑ Bay Area Reporter, "Editorial: State ballot measures", September 20, 2012
- ↑ Contra Costa Times, "Summary of our endorsements on state propositions", September 22, 2012
- ↑ Daily Democrat, "Democrat endorsements: Propositions", October 14, 2012
- ↑ Fresno Bee, "EDITORIAL: Prop. 32 is not the reform that California requires", October 15, 2012
- ↑ Lompoc Record, "Slogging through the ballot", October 8, 2012
- ↑ Los Angeles Times, "No on Proposition 32", October 3, 2012
- ↑ Marin Independent Journal, "Editorial: IJ recommendations on state Propositions 30-33", October 11, 2012
- ↑ Merced Sun-Star, "Our View: Prop 32 goes after unions, not big money", October 4, 2012
- ↑ Modesto Bee, "Unions are target of Proposition 32", October 4, 2012
- ↑ "Sacramento Bee", "Endorsements: Proposition 32 power play deserves a 'no' vote", September 23, 2012
- ↑ San Francisco Bay Guardian, "Endorsements 2012: State ballot measures", October 3, 2012
- ↑ San Francisco Chronicle, "Editorial: Chronicle recommends", October 5, 2012
- ↑ [http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_21603644/summary-our-endorsements-state-propositions San Jose Mercury News, "Summary of our endorsements on state propositions", September 22, 2012]
- ↑ Santa Cruz Sentinel, "Prop. 32: Unfair, and flawed Measure would ban using payroll deductions for political purposes", September 22, 2012
- ↑ Ventura County Star, "Editorial: Prop. 32 a sham, deserves to lose in Nov. 6 election", August 30, 2012
- ↑ Press Enterprise, "Initiative trails in new poll", September 20, 2012
- ↑ Public Policy Institute of California, "Californians and Their Government", September 2012
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 Los Angeles Times, "Judge orders changes to Prop. 32 language", August 13, 2012
- ↑ In the Court of Appeal of the State of California in and for the Third Appellate District, "Kamala D. Harris v. The Superior Court of Sacramento, Respondent, and Debra Bowen, as Secretary, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest, Filed August 13, 2012
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 Superior Court of the State of California County of Sacramento, "Lou Paulson v. Debra Bowen"
This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it. |
- Unresolved, general, 2012
- California stubs
- Certified, elections and campaigns, 2012
- Certified, labor and unions, 2012
- Labor and unions, California
- Elections and campaigns, California
- California 2012 ballot measures, certified
- Paycheck protection, California
- Ballot measures opposed by unions
- Initiated statute certified for the 2012 ballot


text: Reviews Nursery Reusable nappies Reusable nappies Search by keyword Add a review Choose By Brand (2) Bambinex (formerly Bambineo)(1) Bambino Mio(1) Bumgenius(2) Bumhugger(1) Duo System(1) Easy Peasy Nappies(2) Littlelamb(5) Minki(1) Motherease Sandy's(1) One-size contour(1) Perfect Size Nappies(1) Pop-in(1) reusable nappies(5) various(1) More... Baba and Boo(2) Bambinex(1) Bamboo(1) Blueberry(1) Bum Deal(1) Charlie Banana(1) Cotton Babies(1) Disana(1) Dotty Bots(1) Eco Earth(1) Itti Bitti(1) Kushies(3) Little Bloom(1) Little Kiwi(1) Little Lamb(1) Mommy's Touch(1) Monkey Foot Designs(1) Mothercare(1) Nappy & booster(1) Nature Babies(2) Naughty Baby(1) Onelife(1) Popolini(1) Smartipants(1) Swaddlebees(1) Thirsties(1) Wee Notions(1) Weenotions(1) gNappies(1) itti bitti d'lish(1) lollipop(1) nappy systems(1) Choose By Type Reusable nappies Baby monitors Swim nappies Baby changing bags and nappy bags Cots, cribs and cotbeds Reusable nappies Disposable nappies Nappy creams Baby bouncers, seats and swings Children's beds Baby wipes Training pants for toddlers Baby sleeping bags Stairgates Be a Mumsnet reviewer Interested in joining our review panel? Businesses How to get your product reviewed on Mumsnet. Star rating Number of reviews Mumsnet reusable nappy reviews Wonderoos 17 reviews Reusable nappies Tots Bots 194 reviews Bumgenius Reusable nappies 46 reviews Weenotions Pocket nappy 6 reviews Little Bloom Pocket Nappy 4 reviews Real Easy 3 reviews Bum Deal Pocket One Size 2 reviews Itti Bitti Tutto 2 reviews Nature Babies Bambini 2 reviews Wee Notions Wee Notions wraps 1 review Dotty Bots Original pocket nappy 1 review Eco Earth Bamboo terry prefolds 1 review Kushies Ultra-Lite 1 review Thirsties fab fitted 1 review Baba and Boo Series 2 1 review Bumgenius Flip 12 reviews Reusable nappies Berry Plush 4 reviews Charlie Banana Charlie Banana Onesize 4 reviews Littlelamb Microfibre Nappy 6 reviews Monkey Foot Designs Wet Bags 3 reviews Nature Babies Stuffable 3 reviews Easy peasy nappies Bumbles 17 reviews Littlelamb Bamboo Nappy 28 reviews reusable nappies Baby Beehind 4 reviews Nappy & booster Cuddlebuns 2 reviews Bambinex (formerly Bambineo) Bamboo Nappy 24 reviews Duo System Motherease One Size 136 reviews Mothercare Smart nappy 5 reviews Minki Pocket Nappy 26 reviews Bumhugger Ella's House 23 reviews gNappies gNappies hybrid nappy system 10 reviews Pop-in New gen V2 nappy +bamboo 26 reviews Perfect Size Nappies Fuzzi Bunz 77 reviews Motherease Sandy's Motherease Sandy's 42 reviews nappy systems Popolino Ultra fit/ Onesize 10 reviews various Terry nappies 48 reviews Smartipants One-Size Nappy 7 reviews Easy Peasy Nappies Bimbles 6 reviews Cotton Babies bumgenius 5 reviews reusable nappies Coolababy 3 reviews Blueberry Minky One Size 2 reviews Littlelamb Onesize Pocket Nappy 2 reviews Little Lamb Little Lamb wraps 1 review Baba and Boo Series 1 1 review Mommy's Touch Birth to Potty Pockets 1 review Popolini Bravo 1 review Littlelamb Sized Pocket Nappy 1 review Disana Knitted tie-on nappy 1 review itti bitti d'lish snap in one 8 reviews One-size contour Imse Organic 16 reviews Littlelamb Organic Cotton Nappy 3 reviews Kushies Kushies Ultra Reusable Nappy 5 reviews Bambino Mio Washable re useable nappies 19 reviews lollipop bamboo shaped nappy 3 reviews Bambinex Teddy Nappies 2 reviews Naughty Baby One Size Pocket Nappy 2 reviews


text:
Marbo White 45A Neon Cooker Switch
This is a stylish Marbo 45A use 44mm back box to mount neon cooker switch. It's suitable for use on intneral walls.
- Guarantee - 10 year
Read moreabout Marbo White 45A Neon Cooker Switch
- Brand
Product notices
Home delivery
Out of stock for Home Delivery. Please check back soon.
Click & Collect
Unavailable for Click & Collect. Please check your local store stock.
- Our stores do not stock this product
[This is a block of tabs..]
Product Details
Technical specifications
Brand | Marbo |
Model | BQC0121 |
Colour description | White |
Amp rating | 45A |
Height | 86mm |
Width | 86mm |
Depth | 38mm |
Weight | 0.13kg |
Number of poles | DP |
Help & Advice
How to guides
How to fit wallplugs
Wallplugs are essential when hanging cabinets, mirrors and shelves - in fact anything you want to attach to your walls. A normal screw will not securely stay in plasterboard or masonry without a wallplug. They expand to securely grip the sides of the hole you have drilled, and will help to hold the screw in place without damaging your walls.
For more advice on the best wallplugs and fixings to use in your home, read our Buyers guide to nails, screws and wallplugs
Product reassurances
Choose a convenient delivery date on 1000's of products
45 day returns policy
Customer support team - 0333 0143357
Free delivery on orders over £50
Home delivery orders placed on diy.com.
Excludes Next Day Bulk delivery goods


text:
Welcome Carrie!
Welcome Carrie!
Welcome to the site. It's a lovely place with lots going on. I sort of made the same progression as you... only I was tagging for a much shorter time and I've been scrapping for years now. You'll love it, I'm sure.
CarolynMy One Little Word for 2013: Progress
welcome to GS Carrie!
Welcome to Gingerscraps Carrie;)
Thanks everyone! Sorry it took me so long to reply to this but RL unfortunately keeps me busy during the week! I hope everyone has a great weekend and a great holiday for those who celebrate Easter ♥


text:
Starring Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Stellan Skarsgård, Idris Elba, Christopher Eccleston, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Kat Dennings, Ray Stevenson, Zachary Levi, Tadanobu Asano, and Jaimie Alexander with Rene Russo and Anthony Hopkins as Odin, Marvel's "Thor: The Dark World" is directed by Alan Taylor, produced by Kevin Feige, from a story by Don Payne (credit not final) and screenplay by Christopher Yost and Christopher Markus & Stephen McFeely (credit not final) and is based on Marvel's classic Super Hero Thor, who first appeared in the comic book "Journey into Mystery " #83 in August, 1962.
Marvel's Thor: The Dark World continues the big-screen adventures of Thor, the Mighty Avenger, as he battles to save Earth and all the Nine Realms from a shadowy enemy that predates the universe itself.
THOR: THE DARK WORLD (in Digital 3D and RealD) arrives November 8, 2013.
Nope, will not watch; will continue to wait with anticipation for this to hit the theatres!
This is one film I eagerly anticipate. Thor has always been one of my favorite comic heroes.
Looks good. The only thing i struggle with is how they will write out the Avengers. I mean that looks like a pretty big attack going on, why wouldnt the rest of the crew get involved?
Isn't there some crazy Malaysian Thor movie due to hit the theatres a month before this one...called Vikingdom ...(or is it going straight to DVD or Netflix)
Glad to see the Marvel guys working on the same page with each other. Just read this on Cinema Blend. Quote from the director, Alan Taylor.
"Joss came in to save our lives a couple of times," laughs the director. "We had a major scene that was not working on the page at all in London, and he basically got airlifted in, like a SWAT team or something. He came down, rewrote the scene, and before he got back to his plane I sort of grabbed him and said, 'And this scene and this scene?' And he rewrote two other scenes that I thought had problems. Then finally we let go of him, he took off again, and we shot the scenes; and they were just much better and much lighter on their feet. Much more fun, much more surprising than what we had been trying to do. I can relate to guys who come out of the TV world, since that's where I come from. And being able to land and work and solve a problem quickly... I really was grateful."
I'm happy to hear stuff like this. As long as his rewrite wasn't a cheesy "lightning on toad" line. :)


text:
United States & Canada Customers: Call 1-800-813-6897
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
International Customers: Call 1-512-837-4810
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. English language only.
Made popular when Fred Couples shot a 66 in the opening round of the 2010 Masters Tournament, the Ecco Men's Street Textile Spikeless Golf Shoes are hybrid on/off-course golf shoes that offer a casual, relaxed look with outstanding underfoot traction and incredible comfort while keeping you low to the ground for great stability in your stroke.
Ecco's street-inspired golf sneaker shows off rivet detailing and color matching laces. It has durable and breathable textile lining with microfiber heel grip, and the Comfort Fibre System increases the air circulation for the perfect inner climate so that feet stay fresh, clean and cool all day. Ecco rounds out the shoe with a young-looking silhouette, uppers made of distressed waterproof yak leather, good ground stability and textile uppers.
Online Shipping Information
Golfsmith.com offers simple, flat-rate shipping to destinations in the continguous U.S. via FedEx.
Our policy is to strive for the best possible combination of price and service for your shipment.
In order to better serve our guests, we will occassionally offer discounted shipping promotions. Any shipping discounts will be applied in your shopping cart.
"Overnight" shipments will arrive the next business day (excluding weekends
and holidays) after departing Golfsmith. "2-Day Air" shipments arrive
in two business days after departing Golfsmith. On-time delivery for both
methods is guaranteed by FedEx. Shipping delays may occur during busy Holidays
or in the spring -- we will do our best to accommodate last minute and expedited
orders placed during these times.
Most orders are shipped within 48 hours of online placement. Orders must
be placed by 9am (CST) Monday-Friday in order to be eligible for that day's "Overnight" or "2-Day Air" shipments. Orders for residential delivery placed on Sunday or Monday will not be shipped until Tuesday and orders for business delivery placed on weekends will not ship until Monday, so please take this into consideration when specifying expedited shipping requests.
Online Shipping Information
Additional Shipping Information
Sales Tax details
International & Canadian Orders
Men's Street Evo One Spikeless Golf Shoes-Wild Dove/Dark Shadow
Men's BIOM Golf Hybrid Golf Shoes - Dark Shadow/Fire
Men's Biom Golf Hybrid Spikeless Golf Shoes - Mahogany/Fire
Men's Street Evo One Spikeless Golf Shoes - White/Dark Shadow
Men's Players No-Show 6-Pack Socks
Men's Players Flat Front Pants
Men's Chev Aero Golf Shoes - Black/Black
Men's EVO Street Camel Spikeless Golf Shoes - Black


text: Home > Current Students > Curriculum > Alphabetical Course List > Course Details Course DetailsNo Course FoundThis page displays a selected course's information. If you have come to this page directly, please go up one level in the navigation menu and select a course to view. If you are seeing this message after selecting a course, there appears to have been an error. Please contact Law Technology at email@example.com and provide as much detail as you can. It would be especially helpful to include the full URL you were trying to view (copy and paste from your browser's URL bar) in your email. Thank you! |


text:
1976-10-15 Char-Koosta News |
Previous | 1 of 19 | Next |
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
This page
Loading content ...
r^gjNEWSPAPER OF THE SAL1SH, PEND D'ORIELLES AND KOOTENAI TRII 1--Si- Si fQF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION |pff^r%£?fcg; Volume 6 Number 12 MOON OF THE HALF SUMMER-HALF AUTUMN OCTOBER 15, 1976 NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS CONVENES Washington D.C. "Justice through tribal sovereignty" is the theme of the thirty-third national convention of the National Congress of American Indians, the oldest and largest organization of Native Americans in the United States. The convention will be held at the Salt Palace in Salt Lake City, October 18 -22, 1976. More than 3,000 people, representing more than 110 tribes, Indian organizations, federal and state agencies are expected to attend. The convention is expected to be the most important in all the history of the Indian Congress, not only because of the major issues now confronting the Indian people, but because of the growing strength of the organization. Tribal Councilmen Bill Morigeau, Pol-son; Tom Pablo, Hot Springs; Noel Pichet-te, St. Ignatius; Pat Lefthand, Elmo; Joe McDonald, Ronan; Louie Adams, Arlee; and Chairman Harold Mitchell, Jr., St. Ignatius will be in attendance at the 33rd Congress. In its convention call, NCAI brought particular attention to the forthcoming national election, stating, Whether Gerald Ford or Jimmy Carter is elected Indian tribes can expect 'new' Indain policy. In waning days of the unelected Photo taken at the National Bison Range in a range area inhabited by elk. Don Matt photo Ford Administration, tribes have seen a growing departure from the policy of consultation with tribes in major decisions. " This is exemplified by the statement of Interior Secretary Thomas Kleppe that he ' would not be dictated to by Indian tribes ' regarding matters in the Bureau of Indian Affairs. " In addition " to the convention call declared, "the White House office of Management and Budget this year commissioned a report (the Brogstrom memo) that offered a policy of termination of the unique federal/tribal relationship as a major policy alternative. This is looked upon by many tribal leaders as a portent of Indian policy of an elected Ford Administration." Policies of Presidental candidate Jimmy Carter, will also be evaluated by the Congress in its session next week, to determine Carter's stand on Indian rights. A detailed report will be published in the next issue of the Char-Koosta. ACCIDENT REPORT Dixon: For the month of September, there were 13 accidents on the reservation hi-ways. Two have been termed alcohol related. There were three people injured and one death. The rate of alcohol related accidents is down 12% from the month of August when there were 18 accidents, and five of them were alcohol related. Keep up the good behaviour out there.....maybe soon we will have no alcohol related accidents or deaths.
Object Description
Rating | |
Title | 1976-10-15 Char-Koosta News |
Creator | Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation. |
Subject | Salish Indians --Newspapers.; Kutenai Indians --Newspapers.; Pablo (Montana) --Newspapers.; Kootenai Indians |
Description | National Congress of American Indians convenes; Accident report; Camel Brothers firght in Missoula; The Annual bison round-up; Alternative School films Documentary; Tribal Court notes. |
Publisher | Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Nation |
Date Original | 1976-10-15 |
Date Digital | 2007-05-04 |
Type | text |
Format | image/tiff |
Resource Identifier | Y54000161 |
Rights Management | Copyright (c) Salish and Kootenai Federated Tribes, all rights reserved. |
Contributing Institution | Salish Kootenai College |
Contributor | D'Arcy McNickle Library |
Source | CSKT PN 4883.J6 C4 |
Language | en |
Relation | Volume 6; Number 12 |
Digitization Specifications | Digitized at the University of Montana Maureen and Mike Mansfield Library; Scanned as master TIFF using Bookeye 3 scanner at 400 ppi, 8 bit grayscale; Optical Character Recognition with Abbyy FineReader Corporate Edition; Derivatives created using Photoshop CS |
Post a Comment for 1976-10-15 Char-Koosta News


text:
Thank you for adding the business listing. Your business will be added soon in our website.
Would You Like to Add an Another Business - Click Here.
We've been able to get our name out there and extend our reach with the OnStreet Free Digital listing. Now they have introduced many features like uploading pictures, videos, tags etc. Onstreet has contributed to our growth. I've no doubt about that – it's really paid off for us.
Adam NaimanCape TownOnStreet is a great way to connect to customers whether big or small. This has worked as one source that provides business on regular basis. We have prospective customers looking for suppliers...
Bruce BaxterDurbanOur company has been listed with OnStreet since the last 2 years. We are not only satisfied with the response we are getting but also by the service you are providing. We get a good number of customers through FREE advertisement placed in their website, as a result the business has also grown.
Paul ClarkeJohannesburgBeing a small business, we do not have the time nor the resources to engage in the changing environment of the marketing area, but with the help of OnStreet listing, they will find the customers for us. And when they do, that's a perfect relationship.
David KettPort ElizabethNowadays any serious marketing strategy includes the web. With the help of OnStreet Business listing, has helped my business turn the heads of prospective customers and given me an edge over any competitor who lacks online knowledge.
Bill SambanisPretoriaPeople go on about the best advertising being word of mouth, but without the OnStreet I wouldn't have got the customers to spread the word. We'll be using OnStreet for past 2 years, we rely on it.


text:
Events by EventfulComedy Show
Additional Information
Tickets: $15 per person.
Doors open at 7:30 & Show Starts at 8:30.
Includes Hot & Cold Appetizers and Bar Service Available.
Reserved Seating—Tables seat 10.
Enjoy a gut wrenching night of laughter! Grab some friends and have some fun!
Buy 8 tickets, Get 2 free!