text:
CC:DA/AALL/2010/1/Rev.: Places in Certain Federations
To enter your comments in this click on the [edit] link for the section where you want to comment. Please have your comments ready to paste into the wiki by first writing them in a text editor, like Microsoft Word or Notepad. Don't keep a page open for more than 5 minutes.
Always log in before editing a section.
Never copy and paste over the entire original wiki document.
General Comments
Note: This proposal was originally discussed in 2011. A revised version was prepared which treated the U.S., Canada, Great Britain, and Australia as alternatives to the general rule. That approach proved to be complex, particularly in regard to the impact on examples throughout the text of RDA, and CC:DA did not act on it. At Midwinter 2012, discussion resumed on the original proposal.
Summary of discussion points from Midwinter 2012 (see minutes for details):
- Should historical jurisdictions such as the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia be covered in RDA? In the proposal, they are retained in 126.96.36.199 as "the former". A straw poll supported the approach of leaving "the former U.S.S.R." and "the former Yugoslavia" in the instruction.
- Should Ireland be excluded from the instruction at 188.8.131.52? It does not affect the results either way. General consensus was that the point should be raised for discussion but we should defer to our British colleagues.
- Should overseas islands of the U.S., Canada, and Australia be treated under the rules for these countries (126.96.36.199) or under special instructions for islands (22.214.171.124)? Guam was used as the example in our discussion. A straw poll indicated a preference for treating such islands under special instructions for islands.
- There was also further discussion of the approach of treating the U.S., Canada, Great Britain and Australia as alternatives to the general instruction, and continuing concerns that other countries, including Mexico, consider themselves federations. However it did not seem feasible to resolve this matter in this proposal, particularly given the impact on the examples in RDA, which would all illustrate the general practice and not the alternative, which we would want to follow. -- Robare, 6/12/12
Proposed Revisions
The paragraph about islands and island groups splits up the instructions about punctuation. (Let's leave aside the whole problem of display getting mixed up into the rules...) But more than that, it just doesn't seem like it belongs. It's a detailed instruction regarding which larger jurisdiction to record, while 126.96.36.199 appears to be a general rule upon which the later rules elaborate. I believe this paragraph should become its own rule, and be numbered 16.2.2.x, somewhere after 220.127.116.11. Randall 6/20/11
Some comments on the examples: Examples under "In all other cases, include the term ..." Mexico City is not an example of an exception to the rule. Mexico City would not fall under the rule being illustrated ("If the first part of the place name is a term indicating a type of jurisdiction ...") because "City" is not the first part of the name. So Mexico City neither exemplifies the rule nor the exception.
Examples under "Add to the name of an island ..." Puerto Rico. First, Puerto Rico is an example of a "state, province, territory, etc., of the United States", covered under 184.108.40.206.4.1. While it is an island and so could fall under new 18.104.22.168, it is confusing to have it here as an example when the main rule that covers it is 220.127.116.11.4.1. Second, even under 126.96.36.199, Puerto Rico *is* located near the larger jurisdiction, so my reading of 22.214.171.124 would be that it DOES require the qualifier, which is doubly contradictory to 18.104.22.168.4.1.
Finally, under the Budapest, Hungary example, something got left out of RDA which had previously been clarified by LCRI (but was also left out of the LCPS)--I recommend adding in something like "Do not include words such as "Township", with examples. We don't put "Township" in a qualifier even though it's in the established form of the place name.
Maxwell 1 Aug 2011
What is the point of excluding "Township" from qualifiers? The exclusion can totally change the meaning of the place name. For example, in the northern part of Roscommon County, Michigan, there is a village called Roscommon, which is in Higgins Township. In the southern part of Roscommon County is Roscommon Township, which does not even touch any part of Higgins Township, let alone the village of Roscommon. If a name needed to be qualified by Roscommon Township, using the phrase "Roscommon, Mich." is not only misleading, it is flat-out wrong. K. Randall, 8/8/11
There is nothing in the proposal or in RDA that excludes "Township" from qualifiers. If the preferred name is in fact Roscommon Township, that's the form that would be used. In addition, LCPS 184.108.40.206 would still be in effect. --J. Hostage 16:45, 8 August 2011 (CDT)
I didn't notice that Kevin's comment was in response to the one above it. Also, LCPS 16.4 would add the term "Township" after the state. In any case, this is an issue that affects only the United States, and not even all the states, so it doesn't need to be addressed in RDA. --J. Hostage 18:08, 8 August 2011 (CDT)
The intent of RDA 126.96.36.199.1 as currently published is that it means "In all other cases of names that include a term indicating type of jurisdiction." Maybe this needs to be added to the proposal for clarification. Mexico City exemplifies such a name.
The term "territory" has to be understood to refer to an area that is an integral part of the land mass of the country, such as the Dakota Territory or the District of Columbia or the Yukon Territory in Canada or the Northern Territory in Australia. Otherwise we will have conflicts with long-standing practice. We had a discussion at annual about what it means to be located "near". I don't see how an island can be considered near something when several independent countries are located between it and the mainland of the country. --J. Hostage 15:57, 1 August 2011 (CDT)
What is the current status of the idea to stop abbreviating names of larger jurisdictions? Randall, 6/21/11
Since 18.104.22.168.1-18.104.22.168.4 are presented as alternatives to the basic rule in 220.127.116.11, examples of how places in Australia, Canada, U.K, and U.S. should be included within the examples give at 220.127.116.11, to illustrate what application of the rule and not the alternative would result in.
Therefore, I suggest adding these examples in 184.108.40.206:
Northern Territory (Australia)
Darwin (Australia)
Prince Edward Island (Canada)
Jasper (Canada)
England (Great Britain)
Bangor (Great Britain)
North Carolina (U.S.)
DuPage County (U.S.)
San Francisco (U.S.)
The treatment of British Isles doesn't make a lot of sense. Ireland has no higher jurisdiction. If you were applying the rule itself at 220.127.116.11 and not the alternative, what could you add to Ireland? Therefore, Ireland doesn't belong in this rule. I think this instruction should be limited to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, conventionally known as Great Britain. Not exactly sure about the Channel Islands either. They are "British Crown Dependencies" but are not part of the United Kingdom. So I'm not sure that Jersey (Great Britain) or Channel Islands (Great Britain) would be correct if the basic rule at 22.214.171.124 were applied.
Because there is more than one Oregon and more than one Cook County in the U.S., they don't make good examples in 126.96.36.199 (because you'd have to break the conflicts between the state of Oregon and several towns named Oregon in various states and between various Cook Counties around the country). So I substituted North Carolina (U.S.) and DuPage County (U.S.) since there is only one of each of those in the U.S. Therefore in 220.127.116.11.4.1 I suggest changing Oregon to North Carolina and in 188.8.131.52.4.2 I suggest changing Cook County (Ill.) to DuPage County (Ill.). I added San Francisco (U.S.) as a city example (no other conflict in the U.S., amazingly). Since Alexandria is a town in many states, I suggest changing the Alexandria (Va.) example to San Francisco (Calif.)
- Glennan (PCC) for Adam Schiff, 7/14/11
I like the approach and examples mentioned by Adam regarding the proposal. Wolverton, 7/17/2011
Given the difficulties in applying the general rule to places in these 4 countries and the fact that we neither want nor expect the general rule to be applied to places in these 4 countries, I propose that we not make it an alternative rule and go back to making the traditional treatment of places in these countries the default rule. See below for discussion of Ireland and Channel Islands. --J. Hostage 13:10, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
Regarding Adam Schiff's example suggestions -- and I agree that we should supply examples from the 'alternative' set of nations to the general rule -- shouldn't there be a couple of examples where conflicts would need to be broken when applying the general rule? It sounds like we're pretending this kind of situation doesn't exist by using selective examples where we know there are no conflicts. Perhaps a note would have to be included with the example to explain that there is more than one Cook County in the US and the conflict had to be broken, etc.
On the other hand, I agree that John Hostage's suggestion of reverting these sections to the default rule is one worth considering seriously. I'm not convinced that we actually want the 'alternatives' to follow the general rule at all.
If we do decide to retain the alternative instructions, would there be any interest (for the sake of brevity) in combining the 184.108.40.206.1 Australia, 220.127.116.11.2 Canada, and 220.127.116.11.4 United States sections (and their respective subsections) into a single instruction? There is no significant difference between them except in the terms used for smaller jurisdictions: provinces, states, and territories within each nation. -- Lipcan, 7/26/2011
I share the general lack of enthusiasm for applying the current "general rule" to places in the U.S. etc. in any catalog I'll be involved with. But given RDA's aspirations to be a universal code I can see the logic in giving our Anglocentric practice as an alternative, and I would be inclined not to change that approach here. I would include some of Adam's suggested examples (for conflicts like Cook County see his comments below under 18.104.22.168), and I would support Dan's idea of consolidating these rules as much as possible. -- R.Rendall, 7/27/11
220.127.116.11.3 Places in the British Isles
Ireland: Given that the Republic of Ireland is adequately treated by the general instructions, should we propose to change the caption of this instruction to "Places in the United Kingdom" and remove text and examples relating to Ireland?
-- John Attig, 7/7/11
It would have to be "Places in the United Kingdom, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands" because those islands are Crown dependencies but not part of the U.K. Or maybe the inclusion of those islands in the rules is a legacy of the Anglo-American origins of the rules and could be considered too obscure to need mentioning in RDA. --Hostage, 7/8/11
Could we ask our CILIP and BL colleagues for their thoughts on this matter? And propose a caption according to their preference? Winzer, July 8, 2011
I don't think the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands should be omitted. I would defer to CILIP and the BL on any proposed change to the caption and scope of the rule. R.Rendall, 7/19/11
After our discussions in Dallas (Jan. 2012) it occurred to me that Ireland was originally included in the rule for places in the British Isles because in the 1978 edition of AACR2, places in England, Wales, and the Republic of Ireland were qualified by the name of the county in which they were located, e.g. Waterville (Kerry). Places in Northern Ireland added Northern Ireland, e.g. Bangor (Northern Ireland), as we do currently. After the rule was changed in the 1988 revision, the treatment of places in the Republic of Ireland was no different than the general rule for places in other countries. --J. Hostage 11:35, 25 January 2012 (CST)
In 220.127.116.11.4.1, remove the word "province" from the instruction. - Glennan (PCC) for Adam Schiff, 7/14/11
This has been agreed to. It was just a "typo." --J. Hostage 13:12, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
In 18.104.22.168 (proposed), I think you still have a problem. If not applying the alternatives and applying 188.8.131.52 as written, then you have many conflicts like the ones I mentioned above. For example, taking Cook County or Alexandria as examples:
Applying 188.8.131.52 and not the alternative for U.S. means you have:
Cook County (U.S.) Alexandria (U.S.)
But there are many places with these names, so if you now apply 126.96.36.199, I think you get the following:
Cook County (Ill., U.S.) Alexandria (Va., U.S.)
This same situation would apply to the other alternative countries. If my interpretation is correct, I would suggest adding examples to 22.214.171.124 to cover conflicts for place names in the alternative countries when the basic rule is applied instead of the alternatives.
- Glennan (PCC) for Adam Schiff, 7/14/11
1. Is there any support for following RDA is applying the general instructions to islands? In other words, how important is it that offshore islands not be qualified by the name of the "home" country?
2. If special instructions for islands are needed, how do we indicate which islands merit special treatment? Can we come up with something more objective than "is located near the larger jurisdiction and is commonly associated with it"?
--John Attig, 7/7/11
Applying the general instructions to islands would be a big mistake, in my opinion. When a place name is qualified by a larger place, this serves to indicate where in the world that place is located. Generally, that coincides with the name of the jurisdiction that controls the place, but that shouldn't be the principal consideration. If the rule is that places in the United States are qualified by the state, by what logic would Puerto Rico be qualified by (U.S.)? Even if it is, what rule is applied to San Juan? Does an access point like 'Tahiti (France)' serve the user?
Islands tend to have different degrees of connection to the 'home' country. Some are colonies, dependencies, overseas territories, etc., and some are integral parts of the home country. Islands are more likely than other places to change their status and become independent or to change ownership from one country to another (witness Puerto Rico). Trying to reflect those statuses in access points would be neither easy nor useful.
I don't think there is a need for a more objective rule about which islands are qualified. There is a finite number of islands and the world, and there are probably established access points for all the ones that need it. Our goal should be to preserve the status quo in this case. --Hostage, 7/7/11
I don't think there is an easily constructed instruction that can be written for islands. I think it is part of the confusion of geographic names versus jurisdiction names. Would it help to just take out the part about location and just leave is commonly associated with a larger jurisdiction? Winzer July 8, 2011
I agree with Kevin (see above) that the placement of this section on islands doesn't make sense. In addition, the rule itself doesn't make much sense. The rule repeats LCRI 23.4B, but that rule interpretation doesn't give a good justification for adding the larger jurisdiction in some cases and not others. I don't understand why Crete and Sicily, for example, need to be qualified by the countries they belong to. I would suggest scrapping this whole section - i.e., not carry over the LCRI - and if needed make a rule that says that islands only need to qualified by a larger jurisdiction in case of a conflict. Rolla 7/12/11
I think this section is problematic as well – I don't see a way to develop a rule that could be applied consistently to all islands. Wolverton, 7/17/2011
The rationale for the placement of the rule for islands was that it had to come before 22.214.171.124 (Places within a jurisdiction) because not all islands are within a jurisdiction. Some are jurisdictions themselves, and whether or not they are jurisdictions, we don't want to add a larger place to all island names. The rule belongs in 220.127.116.11 because it is about recording the preferred name of the place.
If this is not a satisfactory location, we need a specific recommendation about where it should go.
The proposed rule has been successfully applied for many years now. I'm not aware of any complaints about its application. The proposal was only to codify existing practice. --J. Hostage 13:38, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
I agree with the intent here to codify current practice, which allows some leeway for the use of cataloger's judgment in determining whether adding the larger place is desirable. For islands like Crete and Sicily, I would not want to see a change in practice (why would we want to have Calabria (Italy) but not Sicily (Italy)?). And Tahiti (France) is also not reasonable. Places like Svalbard or Madeira seem like borderline cases to me, and I'm happy to rely on judgment for those. R.Rendall, 7/19/11
Discussion after ALA Annual, June 2012
This is my understanding of what was agreed to at ALA Annual in Anaheim:
By a straw poll, we agreed to proceed with a short-term solution until there is a long-term solution to use the unqualified name of a place as the preferred name and to create rules for adding the name of a larger place to create an access point.
By a straw poll, we agreed to make a generalized version of the CEAL proposal as an alternative instruction under "Places in Other Jurisdictions" that would allow the addition of an appropriate smaller place before the larger place, as is currently done to break conflicts in RDA 184.108.40.206. We will use examples from China as well as some other countries.
By a straw poll, we agreed to remove the Republic of Ireland from the instruction about the British Isles and rename the instruction accordingly.
Discussion about terminology for overseas territories and insular areas will continue on the wiki.
--John Hostage 13:25, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
That summary sounds right to me.
On overseas territories and insular areas, the terminology used in the proposal seems fine to me. Or it could be shortened to just overseas territories. What matters is that these territories are overseas, not that they are islands (though all current examples other than French Guiana seem to be islands - it's harder to hang on to your overseas territories if they're connected by land to other countries). Sicily and Sardinia are islands too, but not so far from Italy that it's inappropriate to qualify them with the country name.
--Robert J. Rendall 09:05, 2 July 2012 (PDT)
Gibraltar is another non-insular overseas territory. Either that or French Guiana should be added to the examples in 22.214.171.124.1 of the proposal. Hong Kong used to be such a territory, and the jurisdiction name is treated as such for the period before 1997. --John Hostage 11:09, 3 July 2012 (PDT)
Proposed revisions
The following changes to CC:DA/AALL/2010/1/Rev. are proposed. Strikethrough indicates deletions; underlining indicates insertions.
add examples after first paragraph:
- Hungary
- Ireland
184.108.40.206 Places in the British Isles England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands
Record the preferred name for a place in the British Isles England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, or the Channel Islands as instructed under 18.104.22.168.1 (England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands) or 220.127.116.11.2 (other places), as applicable.
18.104.22.168.1 England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands
Do not record the name of the larger jurisdiction as part of the names of the following parts of the British Isles: England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands.
delete example: Ireland
18.104.22.168.2 Other places
If a place is located in England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, or the Channel Islands, record England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Isle of Man, or Channel Islands, as appropriate, as part of the name, applying the instructions given under 18.104.22.168.
delete example: Waterville (Ireland)
add example: French Guiana
22.214.171.124 Places in other jurisdictions
add example: Waterville (Ireland)
Record the name of the country preceded by the name of an appropriate smaller place as part of the name of the place.
- Aba Zangzu Qiangzu Zizhizhou (Sichuan Sheng, China)
- Guadalajara (Jalisco, Mexico)
- Ipoh (Perak, Malaysia)
- Lhasa (Tibet Autonomous Region, China)
- Waterville (Kerry, Ireland)
- Wiesbaden (Hesse, Germany)
--John Hostage 12:21, 3 July 2012 (PDT)
Proposed Revisions take 2
Here are my proposed revisions (omitting examples, for now). In particular, please comment on the Optional Addition to 22.214.171.124.
22.214.171.124 Places in the British Isles <add>England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands</add>
Record the preferred name for a place in the British Isles <add>England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands</add> as instructed under 220.127.116.11.1 (England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands) or 22.214.171.124.2 (other places), as applicable.
18.104.22.168.1 England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands
Do not record the name of the larger jurisdiction as part of the names of the following parts of the British Isles: England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands.
188.8.131.52.2 Other Places
If a place is located in England, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, or the Channel Islands, record England, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Isle of Man, or Channel Islands, as appropriate, as part of the name, applying the instructions given under 18.104.22.168.
220.127.116.11 Places in Other Jurisdictions
For places in jurisdictions not covered by 22.214.171.124 (places in Australia, Canada, Malaysia, United States, U.S.S.R., or Yugoslavia [further revisions needed]) or 188.8.131.52 (places in the British Isles <add>England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands</add>), record the name of the country in which the place is located as part of the name of the place. Abbreviate the name of the country as instructed in Appendix B (B.2), as applicable.
<add>Optional Addition
Record the name of a state, province, or appropriate smaller place preceding the name of the country.</add>
-- John Attig, 7/5/12


text:
Progressive+ Calf Sleeves Customer Reviews
Write a Review (based on 41 reviews)
By Michael
Compression Sleeves -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesThis was my first compression product from any company so I do not have a lot to compare to. Since buying this product I bought another sock from another company that I was not impressed with at all due to inadequate compression. I mostly wear these sleeves for long work days and for recovery after long rides. They help my legs and feet feel a little better when I am on my feet all day... not a lot better but perhaps 10-20% better. I was not expecting miracles but this seems like a solid product.
By Danny
Good Stuff -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesI use the sleeves for CrossFit and I do notice an extra spring in my step when working out. I usually feel that when we do a workout that incorporates running or jumping. My legs don't feel as tired. You can tell the product is well made. I hope that it lasts for many repeat uses and I'm looking to purchase the compression socks next.
By Angel
Best Ever -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesOnce I found out about these, I tried them out, best thing I've purchased in a long time. My feet don't swell after running, my calves don't ache as bad, and my legs don't get random bruises up and down my calves anymore. The only thing I don't like is the fact that the bottoms roll up even tho they say they're not suppose to. But I will be purchasing the full sock this time so I don't have to worry about that.
By Denise
I'm a Believer -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesI was skeptical about these at first. One of my relay teammates swears by them, so I decided to give them a try. I put them on after my long runs for recovery, and have absolutely zero soreness! I don't particularly care for running IN them, but they are great for recovery.
By Nicola
Satisfied -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesGreat product, helped me through half marathon recently, legs felt good and helped with recovery time!
By Jim
Loving It! -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesI love the sleeve option so I can wear my typical running socks along with it. Benefits of compression + my favorite running sock = a winning formula for me!
By Cj
Best Running Product Since Sliced Bread -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesThank you CEP for helping me get through the IBX Broad Street Run 10 miler.... Two weeks before I could barely walk and had a pinching pain in my left leg. I purchased a sleeve as a last resort... threw it on and my last warm up run felt incredible. Come game day, I stretched, put on the sleeve and with zero pain ran my self 10 miles to finish my third IBX Broad Street 10 miler!
By Nicole
Voted Best Calf Sleeves -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesI own 4 pair of these sleeves and they are my favorite brand! The compression and fabric breath-ability can't be beat! You won't be disappointed, make the investment and see what all the rage is about. My current marathon pr is 3:00:28 and you can be sure that when I go sub-3, I'll be wearing these across the finish line!
By Jeanette
Comfortable -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesI use these post-surgical vein problems and was tired of paying for medical grade compression hose. I love these, easy to get on and off and it doesn't make me look like a little old lady! Only problem I've had is the length is not quite there and I get a tiny bit of swelling at the ankle, so I got socks that the cuffs put pressure there and it solved it. I forget I have these on and will be working out with them too. Very well made, been using them now for about 6 months intend to continue.
By Joshua
Works Great -
Comments about Progressive+ Calf SleevesI never thought they would stay in place, 30 mile hike from Dixville notch to stark over 15 hours never had a problem, water, dirt, sand, thorns swamp. Great stuff

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The Fourth Hokage's Death Match
this wiki
Please note that this is the Narutopedia's article on episode 248 of Naruto: Shippūden. If you are looking for the article on chapter 502 of Naruto Series then you should head to The Fourth's Battle to the Death!!. |
The Fourth Hokage's Death Match | |||
The Fourth's Battle to the Death!! (四代目の死闘!!, Yondaime no Shitō!!) | |||
Episode data | |||
Previous | Target: Nine-Tails | ||
Episode | Naruto: Shippūden #248 (Watch Online) | ||
Next | Thank You | ||
Arc | Confining the Jinchūriki Arc | ||
Manga | Chapter #500, Chapter #501, Chapter #502, Chapter #503 | ||
Airing | |||
Japanese | February 9, 2012 | ||
Debut | |||
| |||
| |||
The Fourth's Battle to the Death!! (四代目の死闘!!, Yondaime no Shitō!!) is episode 248 of the Naruto: Shippūden anime.
Kushina successfully delivers Naruto, but their celebration comes short when Tobi suddenly appears and kills Taji and Biwako. Tobi attempts to kill Naruto, but Minato quickly saves Naruto from the explosion, and while Minato flees and puts Naruto to safety, Tobi manages to release the Nine-Tails from Kushina. Tobi takes control of the Nine Tails by using his Sharingan and tries to eliminate Kushina, who is quickly saved by Minato and brought back to Naruto. Tobi summons the Nine-Tails to start the carnage over Konoha and Minato prepares himself to face Tobi. Minato arrives in Konoha and sends the Nine-Tails' Tailed Beast Ball away. Tobi appears behind Minato and tries to grab him, but Minato teleports. Tobi follows him. Minato and Tobi start their clash, and Minato lands a Rasengan on Tobi, using the opportunity to mark him and apply the Contract Seal, releasing the Nine-Tails from his control.
- Team Tobirama as well as Torifu Akimichi were not present during the episode, in contrast with chapter #503.


text:
All Documents and Media |
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day |
Page 2 Letter from Emile Zuckerkandl to Linus Pauling. September 3, 1964.(Large Version) Zuckerkandl writes to discuss the progress that has been made on his chemical paleogenetics paper and to discuss a recent scientific meeting held at Rutgers University. Zuckerkandl requests that Pauling add further details related to "the question of back mutations," and lays out his own thinking with regard to this subject. Zuckerkandl closes by mentioning an encounter with Dr. Jennings of the Office of Naval Research who, to Zuckerkandl's surprise, inquired into the details of Pauling's research funding status. [Published by permission of Emile Zuckerkandl] Date: September 3, 1964
Home | Search | Narrative | Linus Pauling Day-By-Day |


text:
This item is from the Spring 2009 season and might not be available anymore. (View current season)
Carry On 2.5
90% polyester / 10% nylon shoulder sling skate bag with all-over screen-print, large cargo pocket, small storage pockets, embroidered Mainblock logo and high-density screen-printed logo. Holds a complete skateboard or extra decks.
- Sizes: One size only
- Colors: Black, Blue, Purple


text:
The mirrors are still syncing but on some mirrors the Live CD's are already available for download. No delta iso's this time to go from Alpha 3 to Beta 1 as they have switched the rpm payload from bzip to lzma to increase installation speed (doing so has allowed for install times to be cut in half).
One mirror with the live CD's and the torrents for the full DVD's can be found here. (the torrents are up but won't be seeded until most of the mirror sync is done)
EDIT: all torrents are live now.


text:
A horse in the trainer's care raced nine times after undergoing a biaxial neurectomy to his right plantar digital nerve, a surgery banned for racehorses.
To continue reading this article, become a member of TheHorse.com.
It's FREE and you'll get full access to more than 20,000 articles, video, free reports & more.


text:
Founded in 1929, Arnolds Used Office Furniture Company, LLC is a leading, globally-recognized retailer of premium brand, affordable used office furniture headquartered in Bridgeport, PA. Arnolds offers an extensive product inventory that includes used office cubicles, conference room furniture, executive office furniture, desks and credenzas, office chairs, and more. Arnolds is known for their premium turnkey services which include free space planning, as well as refurbishing, installation, and white glove delivery services at a reasonable cost. Arnolds ships everywhere in the US and most international destinations.
Visit our 100,000 sq. ft. showroom located in the Philadelphia area.


text:
Graduation Gift Sale 2015
Graduation Gift Sale 2015
How to Save During Graduation Sales
The best graduation gift is usually cash or gift cards. If you're seeking something sentimental, check out customizable ideas from Things Remembered or Zazzle. New electronics, especially ones they'll need in college like a Macbook or Kindle are will also be greatly appreciated. If you're shopping for a great deal on one-of-a-kind gifts, shop eBay, ThinkGeek or Urban Outfitters. We have 9 Graduation Gift Sale 2015 promos for you to choose from including 4 coupon codes, and 5 sales. Latest offer: 'Save 15% Off Graduation Gifts' In the last day, 7 promos have been used. The last time an offer was used was May 6, 2015.
Top Graduation Sales
Great Deals on Tech - Up to 30% Off
Save on TVs, Apple, smartphones, games, tablets, and more. Best Buy promo page; deals change frequently. No coupons needed!
Promo Code Savings - $100 Off Select PCs $599+
Enter code at checkout to save.
Save 10% Off Graduation Sale
Save 20% Off Courtyward Weekend Stays
Valid when you book and pay 14 days in advance
Save Up to $200 Off Refurbished Macbook Pro
Save 15% Off Graduation Gifts
Free Standard Shipping on $40+
PlayStation 4 Console Available Now
Plus deals on select of games and accessories!


text:
Economic development groups to coordinate more
Joshua SeboldStaff Writer
The Plumas County Community Development Commission, essentially made up of the county Board of Supervisors and an at-large community member, seemed to give its informal blessing to a collaboration between Plumas Corporation, Feather River College, The Alliance for Workforce Development and the PCCDC at a Tuesday, May 18 meeting.
Representatives of the four agencies told the commissioners they wanted to begin meeting monthly, or more often, to share information about projects they are working on.
Plumas Corporation Executive Director and Feather River College trustee John Sheehan said the concept was for the group to meet informally in the short term and possibly formally later on.
He said the group would focus on several efforts, including the planned update of the county's economic development strategy, giving input on the creation of the economic element in the county General Plan revision process, and working out staffing for the group effort.
He said the other main goal would be better communication between the four entities and other groups that his background material described as those who "work to increase economic vitality."
Examples for those groups provided in the background covered a very broad swath from the county government to the Forest Service and local businesses.
AWD Director Traci Holt said her agency had funding to provide a meeting place and some support staff for the group effort. She also explained why she thought this collaboration was a good idea.
"We're seeing that it's becoming very, very important that we have one clear message when we're dealing with our business community."
She said she hoped the collaboration would move the partners towards "being able to kind of case manage a business so that when they do come to either one of us, we have a very solid understanding of who does what, what's available, what resources are out there so that we have a uniform message and we're all on the same page in terms of delivering that service to a business."
PCCDC Executive Director David Keller added, "This is a very useful group because I just can't keep up with the flood of information and programs that are going on, and to be able to go and get quickly updated on what's going on with the other entities and understanding what's out there will be very, very helpful for us."
He said much of the groups' current cooperation was "ad hoc right now just because we're so busy and we're all talking to each other, but it's a disjointed effort."
Sheehan said an example of a situation where communication between the entities could lead to better outcomes for businesses was when people realized that one of the byproducts of Simple Fuels' biodiesel production process could be used as a primer in the Loyalton electric generator, turning one company's trash into another company's resource, saving money for both.
"We're finding that we have more capabilities than we know of to cooperate with each other, and what's been missing up to this point is a regular method for us to talk to each other."
PCCDC Chairwoman and Quincy Commissioner Lori Simpson said, "Obviously there's a general feeling our county is dysfunctional" in the area of economic development because new groups have been starting up recently to address issues in that field.
"I just don't want this to be a duplication to meet just to meet and nothing gets produced."
Keller said that wouldn't be the case, agreeing there was a lot of activity in economic development, "but it's disjointed and that makes it inefficient.
"That's what I think lots of people in the public see, lots of things are going on but there's not the kind of cooperation, coordination and communication that needs to happen to really make things much more efficient in trying to make a focused effort, and that's the attempt of this: to harness the energy that's out there."
Sheehan agreed, "None of us want to set up groups just for the sake of setting them up."
Chester Commissioner Sherrie Thrall said, "I think it's really probably very important that you not be a committee of Plumas County for many reasons, but each of you has your own board of directors and are answerable to those boards."
She added that being an informal group would make it easier to have a fluid roster of team members and to react quickly to events without needing to deal with agendas and other formalities.
As the meeting came to a close, Sheehan said one of the first goals would be to get a list of projects sent out as a mass e-mail to all the parties the group collectively works with to share information and make more connections.


text:
Side Tables
- Faceted Mirror Side Table $199
- Oval Rings Side Table reg. price $199 sale $129.99
Console Tables
- Parsons Mirror Console
- Online Only
Coffee + Side + Console Tables
There's an almost endless array of options when it comes to west elm's modern or classic tables. From coffee tables to nesting tables, living room tables, console tables, drum tables and more, we've found the perfect table for your space. Our designs and styles include round tables, glass tables, side tables, end tables, bookshelf tables, storage cabinets, tray tables, stools, consoles, folding tables, credenzas and more. Find beautiful vases, an interesting book or one of our vintage-inspired rugs to finish the look.


text:
Chacin, Rockies aim for sweep of Padres
There's just something off about Sunday matchups for the Rockies.
The team struggled last year, going a staggering 5-22 on Sundays, and wasn't much better the year before, as the Rockies went 6-19 to set a Major League record when they dropped 17 straight Sunday contests.
It's a confusing problem to solve, but Rockies manager Walt Weiss and company had a plan. Just move back the starting time.
"That factored into some of the things that we had heard, that getting a little more sleep would be helpful in terms of our rest and recovery, and sometimes [after] playing deep into the night [on Saturdays]," Bill Geivett, the Rockies' senior vice president of Major League operations said. "We really feel having another hour would definitely be beneficial."
It's only proper that the Rockies will try to spearhead their Sunday bounceback with Jhoulys Chancin, who's had his own awakening after a slow Spring Training.
The Rockies hope the extra time will help him carry on his solid pitching. The right-hander allowed one run and three hits through 6 2/3 innings against the Brewers in their Opening Day loss. He'll look to lead his club to its first series sweep of the season at 2:10 p.m. MT Sunday at Coors Field, one hour later than last year's Sunday matchups.
"Rest and recovery is important here," said Weiss. "It's been well-documented. That's part of the equation. For me, the challenge is balancing all those things and at the same time trying to win."
They'll need all the rest they can get going up against the Padres' Edinson Volquez, who will look to shake off his rocky start.
Still high off his World Baseball Classic win with the Dominican Republic, the right-hander struggled on Opening Day, allowing six runs on six hits in his three innings.
Padres manager Bud Black said he fully expects Volquez to use his plus changeup more than he did against the Mets.
"He will throw more, you can take that to the bank," Black said. "The other day in New York, his head was coming off the target," Black said. "The key for him is to keep it on a line. Greg Maddux was one of the best at that. Edinson comes off that when his head comes off the target. Then his front shoulder flies open."
The former All-Star will look to put a dent in his inflated season ERA. In his career, Volquez is 3-3 against the Rockies, with one no-decision. He earned a 4.62 ERA and 40 strikeouts through 37 innings.
Padres: Headley Optimistic
Third baseman Chase Headley could have a better idea of when he'll be able to ready to return to the Padres lineup come Monday. Headley, who fractured his left thumb on March 17, is aiming for a quick return. That may even mean skipping a Minor League rehabilitation stint.
"This is just my goal. This isn't based on the doctors' goal, but I think there's a pretty good chance I can be playing in Major League games by the end of the month," Headley said Friday.
Rockies: After Construction
After a remodeling and construction project, Coors Field reduced the distance from home plate to the backstop by six feet. The aim was for less foul ground to assist hitters, but catcher Yorvit Torrealba said he sees it helping the defense more than the offense.
"I like it better this way," Torrealba said. "Most likely, you're going to let one ball go by you out of the many, many pitches you receive in a game. Now, what are the odds you're going to get a fly ball out as a catcher? One every however many games? It's an advantage for the catchers, and for us as a team."


text:
Bamboo Fabric, Wool Fabric, Organic Cotton Fabric and Cotton Knit Fabric for all your sewing needs!
Natural, organic fabrics, produced without chemical assistance or additives, are the best fabrics for our children, families and environment. However, you might have had difficulty finding these fabrics easily in the past. Cloth production is one of the most difficult and complex of manufacturing processes, and the textile industry has been slower than most in adopting and providing responsible, natural products.
Because of the rise of bamboo and hemp fabrics, however, it is now easier than ever to find quality organic fabrics for your home. Product lines of organically grown bamboo fabrics are expanding rapidly and many fabrics carry a certification ensuring that they meet ecological manufacturing criteria. Bamboo fabric is the softest, smoothest fabric to wear next to your skin and it has the distinct advantage of wicking away moisture better than cotton or many synthetic fabrics, keeping skin dryer and more comfortable. Bamboo fabric by the yard comes in velour, fleece, terry, flannel and other extremely comfortable styles and is perfect for sewing baby, children or adult clothing.Organic hemp fabric is also available by the yard in fleece and jersey. The weight, softness and strength of organic hemp fabric make it a perfect choice for diaper fabric, children's sheets and blankets, towels and many other household textiles. Dyed any of a multitude of colors or in its natural creamy-white hue, hemp fabric has a lovely texture which enhances any garment. natural,
As manufacturers and retailers work harder to research and manufacture environmentally sound and healthy products, the task of finding and deciding which fabrics are right for you and your family is becoming easier. All-natural fabrics, like bamboo fabric by the yard and organic hemp fabric, are your best source of quality textiles to make your home and your environment as safe, healthy and comfortable as possible.
Many of our fabrics are made right here in the USA. It is our mission to support the American work force in any way possible. If fabrics are not marked as imported, then they are made in the USA.


text:
Mavis Staples Wins Living Blues Awards
Congratulations to Mavis Staples! In the latest issue of Living Blues they announced the recipients of the 18th Annual Living Blues Awards. Mavis took home awards for Blues Artist of the Year (Female) and Most Outstanding Blues Singer. Take a look at the entire list of winners here.


text:
Lindsay Everly
Connect with us. Make yourself heard on the
Triple M Facebook Page
On Air Schedule
Contact Us
Listen to 105.5 Triple M Live
Jonathan & Kitty
4 O'Clock Vinyl
Search Audio
Last Played List
Listen on Your Mobile
Live From Studio M Videos
Search Videos
Live From Studio M Audio
Search Videos
Triple M Photos
Menards How To
Kitty Dunn
Discover & Download
Fresh New Music
Mad City Sessions
The Green Team
Community Calendar
My Madison Perks
My Email Offers
Work With Us
Bucky Book Fundraising
Related Articles
Content found for
fuel efficient cars
Blog Posts
Neil Young's car
When I saw Neil Young's car, the Lincvolt, at Farm Aid, I figured Neil put it on a semi in California and had it driven to Mi...
Join The Triple M Text Club
Watch Live From Studio M Videos
Project M
Mad City Sessions
4 O'Clock Vinyl
World's Worst iPod
My Madison Perks
My Email Offers
Bucky Book Fundraising
Become a Triple M Member
1055 Triple M Audio Clips
Channel 27's Brian Olson slow jams the weather
Channel 27's Brian Olson and his slow jam of the weather
Pothole Beautification Project creator Blake Arshambeau talks about a new way to handle potholes.
Triple M listeners react to the Pothole Beautification Project
Brian Gets Stumped on the Slow Jam
The Coastal Carolina Coach Used to Do What?
The Kissers visit Jonathan & Kitty
Brian's Slow Jam Gets Spacey.
Brian Olson's Slow Jam is for the Birds.
Brian Olson's Slow Jam of the Weather Gets Seedy
Most Recent Blogs
World's Worst iPod: Billy Ocean "Get Outta My Dreams Get Into My Car"
World's Worst iPod
May 6
This might be one of the most unintentionally hilarious songs of the 1980s, but it's a catchy little number and most people wanted to hear "Get Outta My Dreams, Get Into My Car," by Billy Ocean. It was a #1 hit for the Caribbean born singer in...
Read More
Discover & Download: Good Old War "Tell Me What You Want From Me"
K Mcginnis
May 6
From Facebook: Good Old War will release their fourth studio album and first on Nettwerk Records, Broken Into Better Shape. Produced by Jason Lehning (Mat Kearney, Dolly Parton), and featuring lead single "Tell Me What You Want From Me," it follows...
Read More
Kitty's Picks for Madison Craft Beer Week
Kitty Dunn
Apr 29
Madison Craft Beer week is once again upon us, and the hopheads and malt minions rejoice and say "Hallelujah!" Starting May 1st and running through May 10, hundreds of bars, restaurants and liqour stores are celebrating the goodness known as...
Read More
World's Worst iPod: Maxine Nightingale "Lead Me On"
World's Worst iPod
Apr 29
Things got very emotional today for the World's Worst iPod, as we put up for a vote a song that is the MOST TRAGIC of her teenage years. "Lead Me On" by Maxine in Nightingale was moving up the charts in the summer of '79 when Kitty...
Read More
Discover & Download: The Freddy Jones Band "Diamonds"
K Mcginnis
Apr 29
From FreddyJonesBand.com Labeled as the "Darlings of Triple A Radio," Freddy Jones Band has a storied history in the format. With two number one hits and several top tens, the Chicago roots band has strummed its way to the forefront of the...
Read More
Kitty's Day with Badger Honor Flight
Kitty Dunn
Apr 28
On Saturday, I was honored to take part in a Badger Honor Flight to Washington D.C. with an awesome group of veterans and volunteers. We got on the plane bright and early (actually dark and early) and took off at 7am for Washington, and then made...
Read More
World's Worst iPod: Baltimora "Tarzan Boy"
World's Worst iPod
Apr 22
If ever there was a song that screamed "'80s" this is it. There was a whole lotta love expressed for "Tarzan Boy" by Baltimora, even though a lot of people just remembered it as the Oh-oh-oh song! Baltimora was a band from...
Read More
Discover & Download: Kodaline "Ready"
K Mcginnis
Apr 22
From Kodaline.com: That Kodaline are ready to release their second album has still to sink in with the men who made it. The Dublin quartet didn't plan to follow up last year's 350,000 selling 'In A Perfect World' so promptly. In...
Read More


text:
Satellite View Selection
03:00 ACST on Monday 20 April 2015 | Cloud/surface composite, Australia
Images from Japan Meteorological Agency satellite MTSAT via Bureau of Meteorology.
IDY28000 Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology Bureau National Operations Centre Satellite Notes for the 1800UTC chart on 19 April 2015 Issued at 6:07 am EST Monday on 20 April 2015 A broad area of middle and high level cloud across central WA and southern NT is feeding a rain band that lies over southern QLD, northeast NSW and the Tasman Sea. Remnants of cloud from a vigorous cold front can be seen off the NSW south coast and to the east of Tasmania. Cold-air cloud is evident over Tasmania, Victoria, southern and eastern SA and eastern NSW. Cloud from thunderstorm activity can be seen off the Top End coast of the NT.


text:
Providing maximum sleeping comfort and warmth, these pads are ideal for camping when you don't need to haul gear in a backpack.
These inflatable pads use air for cushioning. They're lightweight and pack smaller than closed-cell foam or self-inflating mattresses.
Open-cell foam absorbs air to self-inflate. These pads are more comfortable than closed-cell foam and don't have the "bounciness" of air mattresses.
Light, warm and inexpensive, these mats are ideal for beginners, no-frills hikers and as an underpad for winter camping.
Light enough for backpacking, yet comfortable enough for car camping, these pads strike a balance between the extremes of weight and comfort.
Ideal for hikers who are willing to sacrifice a little comfort for a lighter weight and smaller stuff size.
Extreme lightweight pads for hikers and climbers who care far more about light weight and small stuff size than they do about comfort.
Thicker pads provide more insulation in cold weather and more cushioning comfort in warm weather.
Stuff sacks, pillows, couple kits, pad locks, repair kits and much more.
View more videos in our Video Library.


text:
HEATING REPAIR Orono, ME
We are a full service heating and air conditioning repair and installation company serving the Orono Area. HVAC contractor providing you the very best in heating repair. Cleaning your old heating system is imparative due to the age of the heating system. To provide safe and energy efficient heat, consider upgrading your heater to an 80% or higher effecient system. Remember the heater is the heart of your home.
The repair and maintenance orders rise every day and we keep our cool during these extra-busy days. Heaing Repair Orono are referred repeatedly for comfortable residing through our reliable machinery and world class services. The incredible 70% savings enable customer references and bulk orders, even in industrial units. Traditional units consume more energy and produce lesser heating. The all new electrical heating unit scan be installed by us for favorable weather conditions.
New HVAC Unit Installation Orono
On all of Our Heating Repair services in Orono, we offer a FREE estimates for all new installations.
Our Heating Repair technician carefully inspect your home to determine the heat loss and heat gain which assists us in determining the appropriate unit size and duct size for your home.
Our Heating Repair Services in Orono Include:
- AC Units.
- Central Heating Repair Orono
- Ducts.
- Air Filters and Filtration Systems.
- Heating ventilation systems.
- Home air conditioners.
- Heat pumps.
- VGas furnaces.
- Hot water heat systems
- HVAC Cleaning Orono
- Air Duct Cleaning Orono
- Air Duct Ventilation
Contact us Today!
Other zip codes we services in Orono:
• 04469 • 04473 •
Find AC Technician by Zip:
Why Choose Us?
We are committed to upholding the highest level of service.
100% Satisfaction Guarantee.
Heating Repair
Rated 4.8
out of 5.
based on 12 User Testimonials.


text:
Unfortunately we couldn't find the product you were trying to access
Hey big spender! We're thrilled to see that you're interested in so many items. We like to deal with bigger orders one-on-one, so please can we ask you to contact our corporate sales team by emailing firstname.lastname@example.com or giving us a shout on 0861 52 52 42.


text:
Do you suffer from indoor allergies? Steam cleaners might help
(NewsUSA) - In the late 18th and 19th centuries, steam powered factories, boats and locomotives. Now, steam power can be harnessed at home -- to thoroughly clean every room.
Americans aren't used to the idea of steam cleaning, but Europeans have been steam cleaning their homes for years. Steam-cleaners work by releasing hot steam vapor into the pores of surfaces, where it breaks up dirt and stains. While a vacuum cleaner removes surface dirt, a steam cleaner removes deeply embedded dirt without using harsh or potentially harmful chemicals.
Steam cleaners clean most surfaces more effectively than a spray bottle and towel. They also disinfect areas better than commercial wipes or sprays. Steam cleaners produce very hot water vapor which kills bacteria, mold spores and other microorganisms. Steam cleaners are also effective against dust mites, making them an ideal appliance for those with indoor allergies.
Homeowners worried about the environmental or health effects of chemical stain removers and disinfectants will find peace-of-mind with steam cleaning. Steam cleaners use nothing but water to clean, deodorize and disinfect. Most steam cleaners use less than a gallon of water per hour. Low-moisture vapor leaves surfaces nearly dry -- a carpet takes around 15 minutes to dry after steam cleaning -- so homeowners don't need to worry about damp areas encouraging mold growth.
Steam cleaners are especially effective in killing dust mites and bed bugs, removing pet stains and odors, cleaning grout, removing wallpaper and detailing cars. They can remove grease from kitchen counters, disinfect stuffed animals, clean grill racks and golf clubs, deodorize litter boxes and shine jewelry with equal effectiveness. Powerful steam cleaners can take on the toughest messes through steam cleaning, extracting steam residue and vacuuming. The cleaner comes with a 24-piece accessory kit, which allows the machine to steam and vacuum a variety of surfaces, including carpets and furniture.
Distributed by Internet Broadcasting. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


text:
The 2012 Wake Up Festival was an unforgettable experience for me. I lived in a tent in Rocky Mountain National Park for the duration of the Festival, and woke each morning to find elk roaming freely through the campsite. The setting alone is enough to wake you up! Although I attended several of the amazing talks and presentations, I spent practically all my free time enjoying the top-notch disc golf course on the grounds of the YMCA of the Rockies. I documented what happened during one particular round in my recent Many Voices (Sounds True employee blog) post entitled "The Wake Up Badger." [http://manyvoices.soundstrue.com/the-wake-up-badger/#.UgqYc2S2PCE] Just one of many unexpected and wonderful experiences at the "WUF" as we affectionately call it. Looking back, what I found the most incredible was the palpable energy generated by all of our fellow Festival-goers. Love was evidently beaming out of every human I came across; I'd never seen anything like that before and haven't since, so I'm very eager to head on up to Estes Park for this year's Festival. I can't wait to experience Matthew Fox's Cosmic Mass...
Connect with Others About Your Wake Up Experience
I helped to organize the first ever Wake Up Festival, last year in 2012. We had no idea, really, what to expect as this was the first time we had ever tried anything like this at Sounds True. We had heard for years from our most faithful listeners that they wanted a live, in-person event where we could gather together and hold an experiment: what would it be like to take all of these inspiring ideas and practices that we'd been a part of for so long and bring them alive in community.
Well, those of you who attended, I think know what happened: it wildly exceeded our expectations. When all said and done, the word that best describes my experience was: honor. I was truly honored to witness the opening, unfolding, and flowering of hundreds and hundreds of friends from all around the world, willing to give whatever it took to open their hearts and minds to the possibility of love, healing, and awakening in their lives.
I'm so looking forward to this year's Festival, which begins next week! I'll be blogging from the Festival in real-time and hope to be updating here as well!
Thank you,
Matt Licata
This is my first WUF, and I can't wait to meet everyone!
http://www.consolidatedebt101.com Just like an individual getting an adequate amount of money because of you industry or you could be facing numerous swear crises in the marketplace. Just prefer government policies definitely impact concerning any industry activity.
http://www.drupalhostingguide.com Precisely why YouTube is a superb program to advertise solutions along with thoughts happens because, visual campaigns participate in a serious part inside consciousness, because they are likely to stick to as their mind counterpart more quickly than music or maybe prepared types.
http://www.fashionhelp.org Fashion stylist courses help the budding stylist figure out what clothing and accessories look better with certain personalities, skin tones and body types.
http://www.financecaculator.com Together with determining away just how much the actual amount you need to be lent will set you back every month. These types of calculators may also be used to judge regardless of whether renting instead of investing in a automobile downright can be a much better option.
So glad this forum is here to express my gratitude for the wonderful experience of being at both the 2012 and 2013 Wake Up Festivals (plus this year's pre-festival workshop with Mark Nepo). Still processing the many nuances of impact and how to build on the insights and connections as I transition back to my home life tomorrow and work the next day.
Looking forward to keeping in touch here and connecting with others in person if possible in the Los Angeles area in the coming weeks.
Connie Corley
Hello Everyone,
My name is Mae and I just returned from the Wake Up Festival yesterday. All I can is, "WOW!!!!" So many amazing teachers, teachings, and such a wonderful healing community. I could say a lot right now but I'm still integrating the whole thing. I would love to get to know others in the Seattle area who experienced the Wake Up Festival. Heck, I would love to get to know others who were called to the Festival but were not able to go for one reason or another.
Looking forward to growing our community, something Jack Kornfield said is so essential. :-)
Love & Blessings,
Hello Mae, and anyone else in the Seattle area. I attended the "WUF" in 2012 and 2013. I'd love to get to know others in the area who did also, or who are interested in developing community as Mae has mentioned.
Is anyone out there planning to see Deva Premal in Seattle in October. Would love to connect.
All the Best,
I am also from Seattle - would agree about the WUF - would love to connect with others from Seattle who went
This year I was only able to attend one night of the Wake Up Festival, and I feel fortunate that I chose to attend the Cosmic Mass. Matthew Fox along with about 20 Sounds True authors and music artists led participants in a four-hour experience of a lifetime. If you were there, you know what I mean. I you missed it, I highly recommend attending a Cosmic Mass if the opportunity presents itself. It is an incredibly powerful, wholly inclusive, mind-body-soul-engaged way to join in community ritual and prayer that will leave you breathless yet inspired!
I also found the cosmic mass to be a once in a lifetime event that connected me with the divine in a way unlike anything else i had experienced. Words cannot describe by level of emotion and connectiveness to the oneness of all.. I want to sincerely thank tami for allowing this to be part of my life and it will never be forgotten.
ed jones
When the Irish singers floated through the crowd...
Hello! I had such an amazing experience at the Festival that I couldn't wait to get home and start a meet-up group for Denver area. All are welcome! We will be doing something "healing" every week - meditation, qi gong, yoga, etc along with a social time to chat and connect again afterwards. Please go to http://www.meetup.com/Wake-Up-Festival-Denver/ to join or contact Reece at (720) 276-6118. We will meet at Body Mind Energy Healing Center in West Wash Park at 701 S. Logan St. #201, Denver, CO 80209. www.bodymindenergyhealingcenter.com
I attend a LOT of these types of events and festivals (grateful!) and have to say that I found Wake Up Festival to be one of the most well done festivals/events of it's kind. I wrote out a recap, with my favorite quotes/highlights from each of the speakers. It's here, and I'd love to hear your favorite parts and anything I missed!
I will definitely make it part of my practice to attend every year!
I attend a LOT of these types of events and festivals (grateful!) and have to say that I found Wake Up Festival to be one of the most well done festivals/events of it's kind. I wrote out a recap, with my favorite quotes/highlights from each of the speakers. It's here, and I'd love to hear your favorite parts and anything I missed!
I will definitely make it part of my practice to attend every year!
Hello all you beautiful Souls!
My name is Alexandra and I'm a graduate student of Somatic Psychotherapy at Naropa University in Boulder, as well as Yoga teacher and Personal Transformation Coach. I attended the pre-festival event, Into to Shamanic Journeying with Sandra Ingreman. It was a life-changing experience which inspired the name of our newest company, Spirited Journey Retreats. I truly believe that enlightenment is a collective endeavor - which is why events like the Wake Up Festival are so pertinent in the world at this time. I'd like to use this forum to hear about what developments are taking place in all of your lives after the festival, and sharing our offerings as healers, teachers, students, friends - all members of the same Tribe.
A few inspirational teachers/friends and I have put together a Yoga, NLP, Sound Alchemy, Meditation program that connects mind, body, and spirit in a 7 day personal empowerment retreat. This unique offering is specifically designed to facilitate a deepening of your yoga and meditation practice, in an environment that nurtures your whole being.
During this retreat, yoga and meditation will be complimented by the sharing of vibrational offerings of Source Vibrations sound alchemy. In a quest to gain deeper insight into our most authentic nature and harness our full potential, we will facilitate workshops on Ontological philosophy, NLP (Neuro-linguisitic Programming) and Mindful & Sustainable Living, that will assist you in taking a quantum leap on your path of evolution.
Please consider joining us in Thailand this November ~*~
With Gratitude & Blessings to All,
Saving up to be there in 2014!
Anyone heading over from Oz please let me know.
Cheers, Michelle.
This year I will be there for sure, last year I was not! click here


text:
Front Back Back View larger Kenwood KFC-1664S 6-1/2" 3-way car speakers also fit 6-3/4" openings Item #: 113KC1664S 195 Reviews This item is no longer available. Original Price: $39.99 pair Shop all 6-1/2" Speakers Need help? 1.888.955.6000 Email Chat Ask an expert advisor No pressure, no commission — just lots of good advice from our highly trained staff.
by John Pollard If you've been suffering with tired out speakers, Kenwood's Sport Series speakers are a cost-effective way to liven up the sound in your car. The KFC-1664S 3-way 6-1/2" speakers use multiple speaker elements to bring new clarity and enhanced performance to your car audio system. Each speaker features a polypropylene woofer with a treated cloth surround that delivers full bass while standing up to the heat and humidity in your car. A balanced-dome midrange driver allows vocals and instruments to be heard more distinctly, while the ceramic tweeter supplies the musical details that make your music more exciting. The built-in crossover sends the appropriate frequencies to each element, so you'll hear clean, balanced performance. Grilles are included. Product Highlights:6-1/2"/6-3/4" 3-way car speakers (pair)injection-molded polypropylene (IMPP) woofer with cloth surround1-3/16" PEI balanced dome tweeter1/2" ceramic piezo tweetergrilles includedpower range: 2-35 watts RMS (180 watts peak power)frequency response: 35-22,000 Hzsensitivity: 92 dBtop-mount depth: 1-3/4"warranty: 1 yearOur 60-day money-back guarantee Why replace your car's original speakers? The speakers that originally came in your car were made from inexpensive materials, designed to create acceptable sound at the lowest possible cost to the manufacturer. If you love music, you deserve better. Name-brand aftermarket speakers deliver fuller, richer sound with considerably more detail and nuance, and they're capable of playing louder and cleaner than factory speakers. Connect new speakers to your factory radio and you'll get the best possible sound from your dealer-equipped system. Pair them up with a new car stereo for a level of enjoyment that can rival a high-fidelity home audio experience.
Perfect to replace speakers on 2004 Outback Written By DeanS, Dixon, IL on Friday, March 07, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) This is just what I needed. From past experience with Crutchfield, I knew I could depend on them for good products and service. Pros: Installation was a snap with the speaker wiring harnesses provided.
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Tim, Lomita, CA on Tuesday, February 18, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good all around sound. Pros: Nice clear sound Cons: None
Kenwood speakers Written By Theo, Ft Myers , fl on Sunday, February 16, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Outstanding quality and sound Pros: Quality and ease of installation Cons: None
Awesome Speakers Written By MikeG, Sevierville, TN on Thursday, February 06, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I purchased these speakers to replace a blown factory speaker in my wife's vehicle. The speakers are excellent quality and provide a fuller, crisper sound. the installation kit worked great. Once again, Crutchfield provided high quality products at great prices. Thank you Pros: Price, quality. Great sounding speakers Cons: None
Nice upgrade Written By Pep, Pottsville, pa on Sunday, February 02, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Installed in my 96 Blazer both front and rear. Great difference from the factory speakers. Still have the oem stereo but it is a nice addition to it,especially for the price.
Nice for the price Written By braaap, Deer Park, TX on Friday, January 31, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) These are pretty good sounding speakers; don't think you'll find much better for the price. Definitely better than factory speakers. Pros: Pleasant sounds to my ears Cons: Not enough to speak of.
Way Better than stock Written By Brad, North Little Rock, AR on Friday, January 31, 2014 Bought these to replace door speakers in my wifes 2001 Mazda Protege. They are a nice upgrade from the factory set. Paired them with a pair of Kenwood Excelon KFC-X693 6x9's in the rear deck and a Kenwood Excelon KDC-X997 headunit. As many reviews ive seen about the bass being bad they are correct but they knew that when they bought these they are 6.5" not 15" subs. Good clean mids and highs minor distortion at higher volume but i do not intend to blast my stereo all day. Pros: Very cheap and easy to install, clean clear sound quality at moderate volume (not full volume), voices and instrumentals very crisp. Cons: Very little bass but was expected 6x9's in rear deck more than compensated for it. After all they are 6.5" not 15" subs
Big sound! Written By MorrisD, Liberty, KY on Wednesday, January 29, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I installed these in the front doors of my sister's 2007 Jeep Compass and they sounded really big. They really fill the front cabin with sound and are light years better than the stock speakers. Used an adapter supplied by Crutchfield for free(!) and had no problems with installation. Outstanding speakers! Pros: Great sound, easy installation Cons: None
Better than stock Written By Spinningfox, NY on Sunday, January 26, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good quality speakers. Pros: High and mid Cons: Not much bass
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By JonF, Huntersville, NC on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good cheap speakers, much better than the stock speakers they replaced. Sound is crisp and clear with good mid to high range. Plenty of holes for different mounting options/configurations. Easy to install.
Good cheap speakers Written By Brian, Pasco, WA on Wednesday, January 08, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) They sound good.. I installed thess in the front doors of my 97 ford F350. I can definitely tell the difference between these and the $80 Kenwoods I have in the rear, I had to use my x-over in my head unit to turn the bass way down on these to get them to sound clear at the same volume as the rears.. As expected, because these were almost half the price. I guess the $80 6.5" Kenwoods have a tweeter that is too tall to fit in my door panel. Or else I would have spent the extra 30 bucks to get the better ones. Still a good speaker. Pros: Sound good, Look good, Good quality
Good Sound Written By Gary, La Porte, Texas on Monday, January 06, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) These are good speakers at a good price Pros: Good, crisp sound
Great sound and good price Written By Ram, Lincoln, California on Sunday, January 05, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) The quality is good, the sound is good but some distortion at higher volume. Pros: good quality, good looks...sound great Cons: Found a little distortion with some bass notes at higher volumes.
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Harry, Bellport, NY on Saturday, January 04, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good Sound Quality.
Clean sound Written By Jim M, Casper, WY on Friday, January 03, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) This set of speakers has great clarity! After using the convenient fit guide to find what I needed to replace in my son's car I ordered a pair for the rear deck. I pulled the dry rotted factory speakers out and replaced them with ease thanks to the included wiring adapters. Not comparing these to the obviously worthless factory speakers, but to other quality speakers I would say they have impressive upper range clarity. The size limits the audible low frequency response. If you have a sub or plan to add one these will be a great match for the high pass filter! Pros: price, quality, clean sound Cons: bass reproduction, but hey they aren't subwoofers so I am not really holding this against them.
Kenwood KFC 1664S Written By Rex, Anchorage, AK on Thursday, January 02, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Exactly what I needed to replace the blown speakers in my Sienna van. Pros: Price, all parts included, easy to read directions.
Speakers Written By Jerry L, Four Oaks NC on Thursday, January 02, 2014 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Love the speakers good sound and quality. Pros: Got the speakers quick and easy to instal with the equipment they sent with them. Cons: None
Kentwood Speakers Written By The Kentwood speakers, Houma La on Saturday, December 28, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) The speakers came with everything I needed and was easy to install .They work fine and would recommend them to a friend!!!!!!
KFC-1664S Written By Greg R, Wausau WI on Sunday, December 22, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great sound and fit well Pros: Great sounding speakers, well built. Good bass Cons: None
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By G. S, Lubbock, Texas on Thursday, December 19, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Much better than factory speaker sound. Treble and Bass sound good.
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By jasonb, atwater ca. on Wednesday, December 18, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) there not to bad...better then stock Pros: cheap Cons: kind of flat sounding
Great speakers Written By Rooster, Windsor CA on Sunday, December 15, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Awesome sound great price ! Pros: Best bang for your buck.
Awesome Written By Sergei, Wilton ct on Saturday, December 14, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Speakers sound amazing and the installation was easy
Sounds great Written By Justin, Wiggins, MS on Friday, December 13, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) These speakers sound great considering they are jus connected to a factory radio without an amp
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Anonymous, Brandeis, CA on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Easy to install and great sound for the price.
Kenwood KFC-1664s Written By Lynn, Tiffin oh on Tuesday, December 10, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Easily installed in the doors, and they sound great. Also very reasonably priced. Pros: ease of installation Cons: none
Good replacement for stock Written By Joe Bob, N. Idaho on Sunday, December 08, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good replacement for stock speakers. Not too much bass response, but mids and highs are great. Power handling perfect for head unit power, no need for external amp. Pros: Good speakers for the buck! Cons: No bass.
Good Written By Jay, Scranton on Thursday, November 07, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Theses are great for factory replacement. Easy install Pros: Price sound Cons: Not power rated for amp
Good for basic replacement Written By Larry, Jefferson, MA on Wednesday, November 06, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I called on the phone asking for kenwood 3 way speakers and the sales women sold me this. At this point now I wish she offered different speakers, or asked if I wanted better base or something that can handle it when I crank my stereo. But over all on low to med sound they work great, but at high sounds they get distorted. Easy to install with bracket I just had to cut the mounting tabs off and drill and used self tapping screws to hold the brackets on, the wiring they have was a perfect match, I like Crutchfield but I recommend they ask questions like " is the 100 % what you want or can I help you pick out something that might fit your needs better?" If she did, I'd be more happy, but I did ask for kenwood 3 way. Looking now they do offer a better set of kenwood 3way. But over all I may send these to the rear, and get a better set for the front. I'll use crutchfirld because I do like them. Pros: Good for low to med sounds Cons: If you crank it, they get distorted.
Great Product Written By Huck369, Somerset, KY on Monday, November 04, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great Speaker for the money. paired it with the stock head unit, and sounds much better than the old worn-out stock units...installed them in front and back of my 2003 Subaru BAJA Pros: Low price, Good sound Cons: Not made for hi-out-put systems,
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Chris -, Richmond, VA on Saturday, November 02, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great product for the money in a basic speaker replacement. Very good sound. The experts from Crutchfield made this first time speaker installation vey simple. Pros: Always buy from Crutchfield for easy installation.
Great Speakers Written By Gary, Tucson, AZ on Thursday, October 31, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) These speakers went in the front doors of my old 92 Ford Pickup. They did require drilling new mounting holes, but went in very easily, and sound great, with the Kenwood receiver. In fact, the old Ford radio sounded much better as soon as the speakers went in. Great speakers at a great price. Cons: none
pretty good Written By Rory, NC on Monday, October 28, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) sound quality seems pretty good. For the price you cant go wrong. Maybe if you are building some competition sound quality car, money wouldnt be an object and you could look at some other set. But for most of us on a budget and just want something to work and sound good, these are the way to go. Pros: Price, and they sound good to me! Cons: none so far
GREAT SPEAKERS! GREAT PRICE! Written By ANDREW, GALT, CA on Friday, October 25, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I bought these speakers with some money I had received or my birthday. Not only were the speakers amazingly easy to install, but the components that were sent to me along with the speakers allowed for the ease of the installation. Easy instructions and no complaints. The speakers sound amazing even for still being hooked up to the stock radio. My stock subwoofer is blown out so it doesn't do the speakers justice, but I plan on disconnecting it this weekend to get a real taste of just the speakers by themselves. Great job Kenwood. Pros: Crisp and clear, and amazing sound. Easy installation. Cons: None
Kenwood Speakers Written By David, Phoenix, AZ on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Replaced stock Speakers with these kenwoods good choice in speakers good quality sound much better but would sound better with anthor stereo still have stock stereo.
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Joseph, Lake Mary, Fl. on Friday, October 18, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Works perfectly w/my Kenwood DDX470 Pros: Perfect fit, perfect sound.
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By JRF, PR on Thursday, October 17, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great and clear sound. Nice fit for my jeep Cherokee sport.
Easy to install Written By Russell, Anna Texas on Thursday, October 10, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Placed 2 of these in the window deck with the brackets supplied was so easy to install, still have to put the sett in the front doors the sound between the stock and these is assume
reasonably good but not much bass Written By Steve, Huntsville, AL on Wednesday, October 09, 2013 They sound pretty decent overall, but are short on bass. I was expecting more, based on the 35-22kHz frequency response specs. No amount of playing with the EQ settings on my Kenwood BT755HD head unit could compensate to my satisfaction and at high volume levels the cones sounded like they were reaching the limit of their travel without really making any discernible bass, so I ended up adding an Kicker 11HS8 compact powered subwoofer to my system. That made a very big improvement. I am not the kind of person that strives to rattle the windows of the car sitting next to me at the stoplight, but I do like all the frequencies to be present in my music. Especially the low ones. In retrospect, it was probably too much to expect much bass out of a 6.5 inch speaker, and I should have planned on needing a subwoofer. And knowing that, maybe I should have gone ahead and kicked it up one more notch to a set of "component" speakers. Pros: decent sound for the price installation was easy with the supplied hardware Cons: weak bass response
Great replacement speakers Written By Dave, North Shore, MA on Tuesday, October 08, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I recently installed these speakers as a replacement for the factory door speakers in my 2001 Chevy Astro cargo van. Although this vehicle is only a work van, I'm a music fanatic and being on the road for hours on end meant I had to do something about the awful, flat, paper-flapping sound of the original worn-out speakers. I added an Infinity Basslink a while back to add some low end, (this is still an empty metal van so I wasn't looking for perfect acoustics- just better sound,) but that nice clean bass quickly put an emphasis on the "blah" sound of the full range coming from two door speakers. With these Kenwood speakers installed, I now have a MUCH cleaner and clearer music experience while on the go, with a well balanced range of highs, mids, and lows. The speakers produce plenty of volume while being fed from my Kenwood head unit, (35 watt output) and with the speaker harness adapters provided by Crutchfield, installation was a snap. Very happy with this product! Pros: Great sound, sleek look, easy install. Cons: None
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Bob M., Lewes, DE. on Monday, September 30, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Installed in my daughter's 1999 Honda Civic. Great speakers for the price. Sound great Pros: Great price. Easy installation. Cons: Needed adapters to be installed in rear deck. 6x9 speakers would probably provide better sound.
Good sound at a good price Written By TerryA, Dublin OH on Friday, September 27, 2013 These sound much better than my factory originals. Installation was easy, and, as always, Crutchfields installation kit made it very easy Recommended. My only caveat is that the treble is a little sharp, but I adjusted that with my head unit. Pros: Good sound, good price Cons: A little sharp on the higher frequencies
Great stock replacements Written By Dave, Port Orange, FL on Saturday, September 21, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Overall very impressed with the sound quality. Pros: Easy install. Cruchfield provides all the templates and speaker housings for free, more than you need actually. I have a Chevy 2500 crew cab Silverado and the rear mounts weren't even needed, just a quick swap. Speaker connectors are provided so no splicing. Make sure to buy the conversion wiring harness and it's more than half the cost of what Best Buy was going to charge. Cons: The free front mounting plates needed some cutting of tabs, so get your small saw ready. I used a hand miter saw, otherwise was easy replacement.
Kenwood speakers Written By MarkR, Harvey's Lake, PA on Tuesday, September 17, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) They are good speakers, but it's difficult to get the EQ on the radio balanced just right. I like to drive with all my windows down and I kept blowing the factory speakers, so I got these. They are good, loud and clear, but there's a little rattle from the bass. I just got them, so I'm sure I'll be able to adjust it, but so far that is the only complaint I have.
Overall Decent for a 2013 Honda Accord Written By Bryan M, Chicago, IL on Sunday, September 15, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) After the break in period of a few days, these speakers sounded very good. Although they are not as good as I had hoped, that is likely due to the shortcomings of the OEM stereo in my 2013 Honda Accord LX. I get a very good bass response and the higher ranges seem to be more clear than the OEM speakers as well. The lower power requirements of these speakers seem to be a better match for the OEM stereo than the 5.25 inch Rockford Fosgates I had to return. Overall, I am happy with them. Regarding installation on the Accord, as Crutchfield indicates, an adapter bracket is required. The stock speakers are around 6.5 inch so if you own an Accord, do not buy 5.25 inch speakers as they will require a plastic ring to cover the open area between the speaker edge and the adapter bracket. Just buy a bigger speaker as you'll get better bass from the larger woofer. Also, the screws that come with the speakers will not work on the Accord. I used 1/8 inch diameter, 3/4 inch long bolt and nut. This required that I drill larger holes in the adapter bracket (the screws that come with the speakers also will require you drill the holes bigger). Also, pay attention to the adapter wire Crutchfield provides. The included instructions had the positive (+) and negative connections backwards. Lastly, at the time of this review, CF did not have a Master sheet for the 2013 but provided the 2012 to me and separate photos for the 2013. The model years are somewhat different. Pros: Good sound for the money Cons: Highs could be clearer
Kenwood Speakers Written By Denise, Rochester NH on Saturday, September 14, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great speakers for the price. These are the rear speakers and they work great. Pros: Price and ease of install. Cons: None
Happy camper Written By Dj300, Snellville, GA on Monday, September 09, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Delivery on time. Product, incredible. Totally satisfied!!! Pros: All good!!! Cons: No cons....
Great sound Written By Mike, Acworth, GA on Tuesday, September 03, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Wife loves the fact she hears instruments in these speakers that are not found in a stock radio
Speakers Written By Kenwood KFC-1664S, Essington PA on Sunday, August 25, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great Sound and easy to install
worst speakers ever Written By Anonymous, nashville,tn on Tuesday, August 20, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I only gave one star because thats the lowest there is. If there were negative numbers I would give these speakers that rating they are terible. Crutchfield should stop selling these speakers, stock speakers are better. Kenwood should be ashamed selling these and putting there name on them. Take my word for it do not buy these Pros: Not a thing Cons: they cost way to much for what they are , rattle and pop with almost no volume put to them
Disappointed Written By Chris, Hampden Mass on Sunday, August 18, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) The speakers look good but the performance is just ok. HI and MID are good but the Bass is poor and cant handle any real Bass Boost at all Pros: The Price Cons: Poor Bass
Great Speakers Written By AJ, Humble, TX on Saturday, August 17, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) After installation of my new Kenwood receiver, the sound from the factory speakers were not up to par with the radio output. So after calling Crutchfield this set of speakers was listed and what a difference, great sound and easy to install with the supplied kit. Very good set for my 2007 Chev. Impala. Pros: Great sound and size. Cons: None
Great for the money! Written By Willgcv, Huntsville, Alabama on Friday, August 09, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great speakers, Mids and highs are good as expected but if you're looking for bass look elsewhere. This is not a problem since I have 2 12's in my car so they were just what I expected. I'd definitely buy them again. Pros: Highs, Mids, Ease of installation of course, Terrific price Cons: Not for Bass
Kenwood KFC-1664S on 2009 Infiniti G37 sedan Written By YZayas, Isabela, PR on Wednesday, July 31, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Purchased the Kenwood KFC-1664S to replace the stock front speakers on my 2009 Infinity G37 sedan. The speakers offer an good value for the price and they were easy to install. So far, so good. The Crutchfield personnel did an excellent job guiding me thru the selection and purchase process. Pros: Good value for money Cons: None
Empty Beer Bottles sound better Written By CT, South Florida on Friday, July 19, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Speakers are horrible. Very poor bass. Not Recommend on stock head unit. Sound Ordnance p-65 are much better for the same price Pros: Nothing Cons: Nothing
great speakers Written By Anonymous, cleveland, oh on Saturday, July 13, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great sound for the money.
Great Sound Written By Erroljs, Brockton, Ma. on Thursday, July 11, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) great sound for the price it plays very well in my car so good that im considering getting another set for the back doors. Pros: great sound for the price cant beat it Cons: non to report
Not bad at all... Written By minoru808, Kailua, HI on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Very clear sound. Maybe would rate a five but I need to hear these running off an amp first. I am very satisfied with these speakers. Cant beat the price and free shipping to Hawaii is hard to find. Pros: clear sound, easy install Cons: no bass, but they aren't made for that.
Great sound and a great value! Written By Mike, Cleveland, OH on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) These inexpensive speakers sound great in my Avalanche and were easy to install. The mounting and wiring kits supplied really added a precessional touch. I would definitely recommend. Cruthfield's sales advisor was a big help in choosing the right speaker at the right price. Pros: Price, great sound and ease of installation Cons: None
Kenwood FKC-1664S Kinda thin Written By NeilK, Frenchburg, KY on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Installed these in place of my rear seat trim panel speakers. Speakers sound ok but kinda thin on the bass frequencies. They are a lower priced speaker so I guess they are ok for the price. Pros: Low price Cons: Thin on Bass
Kenwood car speakers Written By Eric D., Alameda Ca. on Sunday, July 07, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Easy to navigate website, prompt shipping, all the parts were there, wiring adapters correct, and the speakers sound great in my Toyota. These folks really cared about my business. Wouldn't bother with other vendors. Just shop Crutchfield! Pros: The way online shopping is supposed to be. Good product, great service, timely delivery and even detailed instructions on how to properly remove trim pieces for my specific car. Cons: Speaker adapter plates needed minor trimming to fit properly. Hard to call that a con though.
Much better than stock Written By Robert, Hanover,mi on Sunday, July 07, 2013 Put these in my front doors in my Chrysler 200. Much better highs and the lows match the factory ones. They have just Enough bass to match the sound ordinances p-69's in the rear deck. Pros: Quality of materials compared to factory speakers. Cons: None
This is not an upgrade Written By talt, Allen, TX on Friday, July 05, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) These speakers will not upgrade your sound system. You should only purchase these speakers to replace your broken or missing OEM speakers. Pros: it fits and it plays. Installation was easy, price, budget Cons: no lows, no bass, no bottom, no fullness of sound.
amazing website Written By loganm, orlando florida on Tuesday, July 02, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Amazing website. From subs to home theater setups to making your own custom car system. This website takes the second guessing out of what fits amd what dosen't Pros: Fast free shipping. Give all the parts you need to install into your specific car for free Cons: No cons!
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Anonymous, Portland, Or. on Saturday, June 29, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Not the best for the lower bass, good mids and high's . For the price I would say a best buy. Pros: Great mids and highs Cons: low bass
Good quality Written By EddieR, Laredo,TX on Friday, June 28, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I bought two pairs of these speakers to replace my factory ones and they are amazing. The install was a breeze and they sound a lot better than my factory ones. The only thing is that it lacks more bass but that was no issue for me since i have two memphis 12's so there is no lacking in bass. Pros: Easy install, good quality, good replacements for factory speakers Cons: lacking bass
They are GREAT, and Crutchfield Team are the best!!! Written By GabeW, Stockton,MO on Thursday, June 27, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) The Speakers are great. They work good in high volume and don't distort. They have ok bass but they don't drown out the treble either. The Crutchfield Team always takes care of me and gives me everything that I need and they didn't disappoint. Pros: Te price and don't distort at high volumes. Cons: Their size. Small speakers can only handle so Much. Not enough bass
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Ricardo, Philadelphia, Pa. on Saturday, June 22, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Significant improvement over stock speakers. It does seem like you need to increase the volume some.
Good balance with subs Written By Anonymous, mesquite tx on Wednesday, June 19, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Running them with a sub. So only use them for mids and highs with out amp. They sound great. Pros: Fits perfectly in Yukon.
Good sound Written By Dodge ram, Adair ia on Sunday, June 16, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good speeker just not enophe base Cons: No base
Kenwood KFC-1664S Speakers Written By Pang, Columbus, Ohio on Tuesday, June 11, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) I purchased these for my sons Honda Civic. Extremely easy to install. The Free wiring adapter saved some time and made installation even easier. The sound is very good for the price. Pros: Easy installation good sound. Cons: No Cons for the price.
nice budget speakers Written By Jeremy H, Portland, OR on Thursday, June 06, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Got 4 of these for my mk4 jetta, since I have the non monsoon speakers the provided adapters where a bit useless. I wanted to keep the factory cross overs so cut them out of the old speakers attached the speaker wires to the old harness at the ground and primary input and good to go. Pros: price decent sound 3 way speakers Cons: could use more lows
Kenwood KFC-1664S Written By Robert, Naperville il on Thursday, June 06, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Good sound for the money Pros: Good bass
2005 Silverado Speakers Written By Jim, Green Bay, Wi on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Needed to replace factory speakers due to one of them was blown. New speakers are crisp and clear. If you want deep bass these will disappoint, but mostly because of factory stereo. Easy installation and instructions were fabulous. Pros: Easy to install, crisp and clear Cons: None
great speakers at a great price Written By Dave D., Warren, OH on Thursday, May 23, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Great replace for the origional door speakers in the wife's '97 Miata. With the supplied adapters and the spuulied wiring adapters this was a snap! The sound quality is good. Pros: Product is as promised. Shipped well. All the necessary adapters for the make and model were supplied. Cons: No cons that I can think of.
BEST SOUND FOR THE MONEY! Written By CJHONDA, REINBECK, IA on Wednesday, May 22, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) All-around great speaker...Great highs and mids...if you are looking for a speaker with big thumps this is not the one for you. However the have the right amount of bass for a front door speaker. Crisp and clear sound make this a great buy! Pros: Crisp Highs and Mids!! Cons: If you are looking for a thumping bass...not the product for you!
Flat Written By KatrinaP, GA on Wednesday, May 22, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Theses speakers sound clear & good, BUT flat.. They have no bass what so ever... I do know that a 6.5 speaker is not going to put out much... But I wanted something more.. I ordered some Sound Ordance (SO) for the same price & installed them and WOW what a difference... So needless to say these was sent back for a fast and easy refund.. Love You Guys @ Crutchfield...... Pros: Clear & Good Cons: FLAT & no bass at ALL!
Find other speakers Written By Money Mike, Savannah, GA on Tuesday, May 21, 2013 Please don't waste your money! Kenwood should be ashamed to make a product that can't even outperform a 10 year old factory speaker system. Pros: Good hi's Cons: Bass and mid range. Entirely too much distortion at higher decibels.
Wish they were better Written By Anonymous, Lehi, Utah on Sunday, May 19, 2013 Crutchfield Customer Review (What's this?) Budget speakers. Terrible bass and not that great mids. Factory speakers were better overall, but needed something cheaper since 3 of 4 of my factory speakers were blown. Pros: Good Brand Decent looking Cons: Sound quality isn't crisp


text:
3/3/2015 ARKANSAS TOURISM NOTICE: Arkansas's Seven Show Caves Are Open to the Public
This is your chance to join park staff and neighbors for a fun and exciting time playing games such as basketball, volleyball, and horseshoes. Come join us and have a great time with friends, family, and other campers in the park.
Bull Shoals-White River State Park 153 Dam Overlook Lane Bull Shoals, AR 72619 Ph: (870) 445-3629 firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
What Is a Genetically Modified Food?
July 24, 2013
Véalo en español
Genetically modified foods have been demonized in recent years by health advocates and environmentalists alike. If we look at the history of food cultivation, however, it is apparent we've been eating them all along. SA editor Eric R. Olson explains.


text:
Larkin Gathering Collection
Limited on space for storage and seating? The Gascho Larkin Collection is the perfect solution. A deep storage drawer and shelf are built in to the table base to help clear your clutter. The 42" x 54" table top extends to 66" to make room for the seating of six quests. Not only functional, the modern two tone finish of sandstone and espresso will add a stylish look to your room serving a dual purpose. Bring this collection to life with the two available stool options in the Taylor and Ensley which both feature contoured seats. A collection made of the finest select solid maple available and entirely handcrafted in the U.S.
- Color: Sandstone #29 & Espresso #8
- Wood Species: Maple
- Dimensions: 42"W x 54"L
- Weight: Table Top: 71 lbs, Table Base: 58 lbs
- Cubes: Table Top: 6.85, Table Base: 16.06