text:
Abstract available in
Claims available in
Description (OCR text may contain errors)
United States Patent FOREIGN PATENTS Primary Examiner-H. Hampton Hunter Attorney-Leonard S. Knox ABSTRACT: A waistband for wearing apparel, e.g. trousers, which includes a woven strip to preclude rolling over of the outer edge portion of the waistband. in order to perform its function the strip has a degree of inherent rigidity but is flexible in the sense that its presence does not discommode the wearer. These characteristics are obtained by using a comparatively stiff thread in the weft, usually a monofilament of nylon or the equivalent. Since the strip is usually slit from wider goods the edges are rough or erose. Furthermore, since the weft threads are short and comparatively rigid the warp threads are inadequate to anchor them, so that they are free to slide and thereby present this rough or erose edge configuration which can puncture and/or abrade the adjacent shell fabric. The disclosure relates to an edge construction for the strip to avoid this undesirable behavior.
Pmtmmmzal n N Vf TOR m l 511411161 5 I HM 5 WAIS'IBAND consraucriois BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In my US. Pat. No. 3,l55,986, granted Nov. 10, 1964, there is disclosed a waistband construction wherein one component of the assembly is a woven strip which is comparatively rigid but resilient in the narrow or weft direction and is utilized to preclude rolling over of the edge of the garment at which the waistband is located. The strip has transverse curvature which, combined with the resilient weft, exerts a force on the shell fabric in a direction toward the wearer. Thus embonpoint which tends to cause rollover of the garment, e.g. trousers, is resisted. In order to exert the desired force and yet possess the yieldability to adapt to the movements of the wearer with consequent freedom from discomfort the strip, in a preferred form, comprises a woven fabric having a monofilament in the weft and a cotton thread in the warp. With this construction the initially flat strip may be molded under heat into the curved transverse cross section. The blank strip may be obtained by slitting a broad fabric or by weaving on a narrow loom.,ln the case where the strips are cut from board fabric, whether by cold shearing or by the use of a hot knife, the edges of the fabric are rough. In the case of hot cutting a strip containing nylon or other thermoplastic in the weft the edges become even more erose and brittle. Although the initial broad fabric may be treated to bond the warp and weft, the bonding material may become degraded during laundering and drycleaning. Accordingly, the weft threads being short, smooth and wiry, may work out at the edges to a greater or lesser degree. In any case the rough edges, from whatever cause, can abrade and puncture the shell fabric overlying the one edge of the strip, with obviously undesirable results. In the case of strip woven on a narrow loom the return bights of the weft, i.e. the selvage, tend to break, with the same undesirable protrusion of points which may penetrate the shell fabric and abrade the same. Obviously, abrasion and puncture of the cloth overlying the strip present serious problems of discomfort and premature wear of the garment. Heretofore, an attempt has been made to solve the problem to which the' present invention is directed by covering the offending edge of the strip by an edge binding. Not only is this an expensive expedient but adds undesirable bulk.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to improvements in the waistband disclosed in my said patent. Specifically, the stiffening strip of the character described therein has at least one, and preferably both edges of the strip provided with a bead acting as a buffer between the rough edge and the fabric to which the strip is adjacent. Further, the bead serves to lock the weft threads against transverse shifting. Although it is ordinarily not necessary to provide the bead on both edges, it is preferred to do so in order that the manufacturer of the garment need not observe left" or right when sewing the strip into the waistband assembly, having in mind that the bead is quite small in its transverse extent and therefore tends to be visually merged into the strip per se. It must be mentioned that a bead which is unnecessarily bulky may be perceptible when the garment is worn and, for that reason, objectionable. Further by restricting the size of the bead to the greatest possible extent consistent with its function, feeding of the strip to the sewing machine is facilitated.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the drawing:
FIG. I is an enlarged section taken transversely of the waistband showing the relationship of the several fabric layers comprising a typical waistband assembly incorporating the principles of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a section of the stiffening strip including the beaded edges;
FIG. 3 is a somewhat enlarged cross section taken on the line 3-3 of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a view taken on the line 4-4 of FIG. I;
FIG. 5 is a view similar to FIG. 4 but showing the behavior of the weft of the stiffening strip in the absence of the headed edge, in the case of a strip cut from widcr goods; and
FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIG. 5 except that the strip has been woven on a narrow loom.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT By way of example, the invention will be described with reference to the waistband of a pair of trousers, although it will be evident that the same is adaptable to other garments such as skirts, girdles and brassieres having an edge portion, not in the form of a waistband in the usual sense, which is designed to resist rollover.
The waistband 10, sometimes termed the shell fabric of the waistband, since it is essentially a matching continuation of the shell II of the garment, is joined to the shell by stitching I3. In conventional trousers the waistband 10 is about I inches in width, and is folded over to define a bight I5 and an inner depending flap I6. Within the fold defined by the waistband I0 an flap I6 there is disposed a stiffening strip I8, best seen in FIG. 2, and preferably of the construction dis closed in my said patent. It will be noted that the strip is resilient and concave inwardly of the garment in order to perform its function of precluding rollover. In order to possess the resiliency required by this function, thc transverse threads 2| constituting the weft are preferably a monofllament, cg. nylon, capable of being woven and then molded under heat to the curved transverse cross section. Nylon is preferred as it will maintain the molded shape notwithstanding laundering and dry cleaning operations, and is not adversely affected by imparting a so-called permanent press" condition to the garment.
In the ordinary case the waistband assembly includes a curtain 23 comprising a pocketing type of material 24 and scrim or canvas 25, both folded over at the top 26 and sewn together at the bottom, as at 27. The flaps 28 and 29 abut the flap l6 and are sewn jointly with this flap and the strip It by stitches 34.
For clarity in the drawing the several components of the waistband assembly and their spacing are intentionally exaggcrated.
Turning to FIG. 4 it will be noted that the weft threads 21 are relatively short, say on the order of 1 inch and, further, that they are resilient, i.e. do not readily assume the wavy form which a conventional, nonsynthetic thread will assume when woven. Accordingly, the weft threads 2i are not adequately locked into the warp threads, e.g. cotton, and may therefore be easily dislodged. FIG. 5 illustrates a strip I814 exhibiting this condition wherein some weft threads are shown dislodged. 'Io avert such dislodgement the fabric, in the broad form in which it is initially woven, is treated to bond the warp and weft at their intersections. However, it has been found that the bonding substance is degraded during laundering and drycleaning. In the case where the strip is slit from wide goods, for example, by scoring or shearing, the edges of the strip are rough and therefore abrasive. This roughness not only causes abrasion of the adjacent fabric, i.e. the shell fabric, but discomfort and annoyance. In the case of the strip 18b (FIG. s woven on a narrow loom, similar roughness can develop in that the return bights of the weft at the selvages may break due to the bending on a small radius of a relatively stiff monofilament yarn.
In accordance with the present invention at least that selvage of the strip 1%, which is uppermost when incorporated in the waistband, is provided with a protective bead 31 which, in the finished waistband, presents a smooth edge over which the fold I5 is made. Although the weft threads may be adequately locked by providing the bead 31 on only one edge, i.e. the edge which is uppermost in the finished garment, it is preferred to provide the bead on both edges in order that the assembly of the strip I8 with the waist band can be made without the annoyance of having to differentiate between leftor right-hand feeding of the strip to the sewing machine. The bead or beads M are preferably applied to the strip immediately following molding thereof into the transverse curve. It will be noted from HO. 3 that the bead 31 not only forms a finished edge preventing the needlelike ends of the weft threads from penetrating or abrading the adjacent shell fabric but prevents displacement of those threads. Furthermore. the material of the bead flows into the interstices of the strip [8 to unit the bead, warp and weft into an integrated whole. at least one of the warp threads being embedded in the bead. In this way separation of the bead is reliably prevented. Further it will be noted that the bead. at its thickest part. is of substantially the same thickness as the base fabric per se. In this way the flexibility of the strip is essentially unimpaired and the bead is incapable of adding bulk to the finished waistband.
It will be understood that the principles of the invention are applicable to the case of a flat stiffening strip which exhibits the same roughness at the edge.
Application of the bead or beads 31 can be accomplished by extruding a suitable plastic composition e.g. a polymer, onto the moving strip. e.g. during its transit through the molding machine, the composition being in a sufficiently flowable condition, whereafter the bead or beads are cured. It will be understood that the resultant bead. will desirably possess a resiliency substantially the same as the fabric of the strip per se to avoid boardiness in the completed waistband.
A suitable polymer is a plastisol composed of a polyvinyl chloride-polyvinyl acetate copolymer resin where the vinyl acetate portion is approximately percent, together with a plasticizer. The composition will yield 95 percent of its ultimate tensile strength up to 400 F. and will be found satisfactory in the presence of present-day drycleaning solvents and laundering materials. Pressing temperatures range from 230 F. to 330 F. So-called permanent press temperatures range from 310 F. to 325 F.
Where. herein. I refer to an inwardly folded shell waistband. e.g. shown as a single layer in the drawing. it will be understood that the same may comprise more than one layer over a part or the whole thereof. and that the abrasion mentioned can affect deleteriously such layers as comprise the fold l5.
l. A waistband assembly for an article of wearing apparel comprising an inwardly folded shell waistband and a strip of woven textile material positioned inwardly of the shell waistband to stiffen the latter and preclude rollover thereof. the strip comprising resilient, comparatively stiff monofilaments in the transverse direction, one edge of the strip being positioned within the fold of the shell waistband, and adjacent the bight thereof, said edge having a bead of plastic material adherent to the strip, said material being taken from the class consisting of polyvinyl chloride. polyvinyl acetate and polyamides together with a plasticizer. said bead. when cured. encapsulating and gripping the ends of the monofilaments and at least one warp thread adjacent said edge and filling the interstices between the warp and weft coextensive with the bead to bond the warp and weft. further precluding displacement of the monofilaments, said bead being not substantially greater in thickness than the strip, said bead providing a buffer zone between the ends of the monofilaments and the adjacent shell waistband fabric. said material being thermoplastic and. when cured. proof against degradation at the temperatures encountered in conventional drycleaning and laundering operations and the substances employed in said operation.
2. The combination in accordance with claim I in which the strip is curved transversely with the concave side facing inwardly of the article.
Patent Citations
Referenced by
Original Image


text:
Welcome to WebmasterWorld
Guest from 126.96.36.199
free tools
pro membership
recent posts
open posts
Become a Pro Member
Forums Index
Google SEO News and Discussion
, Moderators:
Robert Charlton
brotherhood of lan
Google SEO News and Discussion Forum
The utility of Google Toolbar PageRank?
Msg#: 4604838 posted
11:23 am on Aug 24, 2013
(gmt 0)
Mod's note: This discussion of Google Toolbar PageRank split off from the August 2013 Google Updates and SERP Changes thread....
System: The following 11 messages were cut out of thread at:
] by robert_charlton - 1:12 pm on Aug 25, 2013
This time Google forget to update PR
edited by
: Robert_Charlton at 9:30 pm (utc) on Aug 25, 2013]
Msg#: 4604838 posted
12:51 pm on Aug 24, 2013
(gmt 0)
This time Google forget to update PR
Pagerank is a metric most used by link buyers and sellers. It's a hypocritical stand for Google to say don't buy links when their toolbar's pagerank is the primary metric used to value links in such transactions. To be honest, I hope PR goes over the waterfall to disappear down the river.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
3:51 pm on Aug 24, 2013
(gmt 0)
It's a hypocritical stand for Google to say don't buy links when their toolbar's pagerank is the primary metric used to value links in such transactions.
There's nothing hypocritical about it. When toolbar PR was introduced, the idea was to give a rough guide to a site's importance and credibility. (If a lot of people linked to a page, causing it to enjoy high PR, the implication was that the page was worthwhile because it had earned a significant number of citations.) The link buyers and sellers came later.
Today, toolbar PR continues to have some utility, although I'd agree that the negative aspects of toolbar PR probably outweigh any benefits for users. If and when Google decides to kill off toolbar PR, I doubt if anyone except link buyers and sellers will complain.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
5:11 pm on Aug 24, 2013
(gmt 0)
To be honest, I hope PR goes over the waterfall to disappear down the river.
Please don't say something like that. I'm a big fan of Google Toolbar PageRank :-)
Msg#: 4604838 posted
11:46 pm on Aug 24, 2013
(gmt 0)
No doubt the publicizing of PR was a bad mistake of Google. Should have always been internal.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
5:07 am on Aug 25, 2013
(gmt 0)
No doubt the publicizing of PR was a bad mistake of Google. Should have always been internal.
I'm going to disagree. The internet was different back then. When you visited a site and didn't know if you should trust it or not, that green bar gave you a hint of confidence. We have different signals now, but those things weren't there then.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
12:38 pm on Aug 25, 2013
(gmt 0)
There's nothing hypocritical about it.
On what basis do you make this assumption? The toolbar is not natively supported in most browsers and is in fact primarily available via third party toolbars that just happen to be SEO related.
When toolbar PR was introduced
The keyword in your statement is "when." Living in the present, all can freely see how pagerank is heavily relied upon to barter links. Pagerank values should be eliminated from the public not just because of its use in buying/selling links, but also because the data is old.
A lot more goes into page trust than an arbitrary number Google has assigned it months ago. For example, dropped domains purchased from auction can retain pagerank values. If "ordinary" users were somehow able to see the toolbar pagerank, they may actually be placing trust in a domain that no longer belongs to its original owner.
As I originally noted, Google's hypocritical stand when it comes to buying links is quite apparent. In this case, Google benefits from each toolbar export from the buzz (free marketing) it creates in the webmaster community.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
2:39 pm on Aug 25, 2013
(gmt 0)
Turbocharged, I think you're confused about what "hypocritical" means. Google would be hypocritical if it said "Don't buy or sell links" and ran a link-brokerage business. Saying "Here's information that you may find useful, but don't abuse it" isn't hypocritical; it just shows that Larry Page and Sergey Brin had a naive faith in human nature when they launched Google 15 years ago.
As for toolbar PR, it may be imperfect (and outdated), but it's an example of the "transparency" that site owners and SEOs are always demanding of Google.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
2:41 pm on Aug 25, 2013
(gmt 0)
If I am unsure of using nofollow on a link, I use the PR of the domain to help me decide. If it has a PR of over 4 I feel relatively safe linking to it (though I have seen some dodgy sites with high PR).
Msg#: 4604838 posted
3:21 pm on Aug 25, 2013
(gmt 0)
Toolbar PR, or its absence, can also suggest that a site has been penalized. Google could just as easily put a flag in Chrome or the Google Toolbar that said "This site has been penalized" or "We don't trust this site," but that would raise a bigger hue and cry (and probably more lawsuits) than a neutral display of toolbar PageRank.
Also, as Google's algorithms continue to become more sophisticated (with PR playing less of a role in rankings), there may be some value for Google in keeping SEOs distracted by PageRank.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
11:55 pm on Aug 25, 2013
(gmt 0)
Turbocharged, I think you're confused about what "hypocritical" means.
I'm quite correct in the context of Google telling people that buying and selling links is bad, but it's okay for Google to keep publishing the monetary metric that these link sales are based upon.
As for toolbar PR, it may be imperfect (and outdated), but it's an example of the "transparency" that site owners and SEOs are always demanding of Google.
When was the last toolbar export? I think it was around six months ago. This is not being transparent. Old data serves no purpose. And during this time a lot of dropped domains have changed hands, sneaky 301 redirects have been installed and other techniques have been used to scam link buyers out of money. I will concede that old data may be better than no data for some, but for a search engine that preaches webmasters should provide fresh and compelling content it is another example of hypocrisy.
Also, as Google's algorithms continue to become more sophisticated (with PR playing less of a role in rankings), there may be some value for Google in keeping SEOs distracted by PageRank.
Agreed. As noted in my previous post, a toolbar export can create a buzz and change the topic of discussion in the webmaster community. When Google gets caught with their hands in the cookie jar, or handing those cookies over to the Feds, a quick toolbar export may provide them some cover.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
2:42 am on Aug 26, 2013
(gmt 0)
If it has a PR of over 4 I feel relatively safe linking to it...
That's the PR 4 Fetish. Do you know where PR 4 gained it's importance? Many years ago the backlink search only showed links from sites PR 4 and up. That was an arbitrary choice by Google. The intent of the backlink search was just to show a random sampling. So, unaware of how web publishers would use the information, the Google engineers randomly chose PR 4 as the threshold for sites seen in the backlink search.
But it backfired because it gave birth to the SEO Myth that PR 4 and above is a sign of quality. The reality was that there was no magic to PR 4, it was simply a random choice.
Dave Naylor mentioned to Matt Cutts (at Pubcon London 2003) that a true sampling would show a mix of PRs, and that the current system caused discrimination against under PR 4 sites. Matt agreed and brought Dave's suggestion back to the Googleplex and the backlink search soon returned a true random sampling of sites.
Unfortunately, the PR 4 Fetish remains to this very day, even though SEO people no longer remember why PR 4 became a metric. You really should stop using PR 4+ as a metric because there is no basis for believing a site less than PR 4 is not worth linking to. It's a mistake to dismiss sites less than PR 4.
If you truly want to be successful, adopt solid practices. Try to understand the true reasons behind certain marketing practices. I hope this information helps you make better decisions. ;)
The day may come when the Toolbar will disappear and I truly fear a future when web publishers rely on non-Google toolbar ranks to make linking or marketing decisions. That's a lot of power and influence to hand over to an SEO company or a Tool seller.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
3:33 am on Aug 26, 2013
(gmt 0)
We have different signals now, but those things weren't there then.
And can you tell us what are those signals? The thousands of fake accounts and "likes" in FB or the thousands fake accounts of "followers" in twitter?..
Msg#: 4604838 posted
4:42 am on Aug 26, 2013
(gmt 0)
The thousands of fake accounts and "likes" in FB or the thousands fake accounts of "followers" in twitter?..
Of course not. Read the scientific papers. Even the non-search industry scientists, the ones focused on data mining, dismiss metrics such as followers because they're too easy to game. The research papers I've read about data mining Twitter note that they're looking for signals related to influence, and the amount of followers are
a signal of influence. Regarding Facebook Likes, that was dismissed already by Matt Cutts himself at SMX.
Msg#: 4604838 posted
11:14 am on Aug 26, 2013
(gmt 0)
Using the PR metric to decide about using nofollow on a link is way down on the list. Most of the sites I link to in my articles when I talk about a website or reference some page, I actually don't use nofollow since they are usually good sites and I am linking to them in a natural flow of an article (I am not trying to send them PR for some sort of gain financial or otherwise).
To be frank I think nofollow is way over used now because everyone is running scared of Google. It may have made some link buyers etc rethink things but mainly it has hurt small and medium size websites. It annoys me when I see a relatively large newspaper website link to my content which they used to talk about in an article and they nofollow the link.
Global Options
open messages
active posts
Forums Index
Google SEO News and Discussion
All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Free Tools
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Report Problem
WebmasterWorld is a
Developer Shed Community
owned by
Jim Boykin
© Webmaster World 1996-2014
all rights reserved

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Arcadia Hotel
No availability found through our partners. Please contact the business directly or check some of our recommended alternatives.
How has this hotel rated in the past?
Photos of Arcadia Hotel
Travelers also recommend:
TripAdvisor Reviews Arcadia Hotel Rome
Travel Blogs from Rome
Breakfast in Paris, Tea in Rome
... look pretty with the Christmas lights. Due to some tied little legs we decided to catch the underground back to the hotel.
Sunday 14th - after a nice refreshing breakfast we set out to find the "Piazza Navona" which we didn't see on our last trip to Italy.One of the most beautiful baroque squares in Rome, it sits on the ancient ring, the Stadium of Domition built in 85 AD to host Greek athletic events it could host ...
Greetings from the Popes, Francis, Tom & Peggy
... which is another spectacular temple and in amazingly good condition for being over 1900 years old. We passed Gepetto's shop where Tom took a turn posing as Pinocchio. Then on to Piazza Navona. This is where the
the Fontana dei Quattro Flumi (the "Fountain of the Four Rivers" is located which was featured in Dan Brown's Angels and Demons. The Piazza is surrounded by restaurants and shops. The group chose to eat at 4 Fiumi which had outdoor seating where we ...
Europe's Armpit
... mainly consisted of marble statues. Most of which appear to have had some rhino plastic work on the old schnoozley. Obviously the weakest point of the sculpture most of the noses on the busts had appeared to been replaced. One large hallway was dedicated to detailed tapestries, some depicting quite gruesome scenes. The penultimate exhibit to the chapel are the four "Raphael Rooms." Formerly Pope Julius II private apartments. These are large rooms with every inch of the wall & ...
Paying my visit to the Ruins- Rome
... rather musky and grassy. Seriously they need to invent how to capture smells.
We then made a brief stop at the Trajan market which houses one of the best preserved roman streets and market. It was funny to see how there were actual several stories to this market, like a legit mall of some sort. We also visited the Victorriano which is referred to as the wedding cake of Rome by the Romans. It is referred to it this way by the romans since it was built in 1911 and although ...
Rome: History, Culture & Culinary Delights
General observations
Rome is more crowded than we anticipated, hoards of tourists everywhere. How the locals must hate to see those large tour buses roll in. Cooler weather in low to mid 70s. Have unpacked the jeans and long sleeve shirts.
Monday, September 30
Love the trains in this country. Another easy, quick train from Naples to Rome took just over an hour as train traveled at 185 mph. Short taxi ride took us to ...


text:
There are no items in your cart at this time.
Footwear etc. Rewards: Enjoy $10 in Rewards Just for Signing Up!
Enter your email address below and we will notify you when this product is back in stock.
Wow, a multi-functional cushion that not only helps prevent blisters on your heels, but can also be used at the inside top of a mule, boot or slide to ease friction or help with sizing. Try them with your hosiery to stop runs and prevent slipping and sliding.
Sign up to receive new arrival, sale & special event info from us.
Note: we do not share your personal information with anyone. Period.
"Love MBT's. Very Happy to see them offered again along with new styles. It's the only shoe I wear. My original sandals lasted 8 years and I wore them everywhere. Happy to find a great replacement. Great Service from Footwear etc. makes it even better!"
©2015 Footwear Etc. All Rights Reserved. For any questions or assistance call 1-800-720-0572.


text:
Baby Gear
Baby Carriers, Car Seat Accessories, Car Seats & Booster Seats, more...
Sign up & be the first to hear about exclusive offers,
new arrivals & more.
We're sorry, this product is no longer available!
Shop for other products in AAA Batteries
Does your battery perform well in one appliance, but does it not last very long in another one?
Try Duracell Ultra
It is specifically designed to be the most powerful Duracell alkaline in all devices.


text:
Camille Fournier 2012-04-13, 15:09
Scott Fines 2012-04-13, 15:15
Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-04-13, 20:19
Jeremy Stribling 2012-04-13, 21:25
Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-04-13, 21:31
Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-04-13, 21:38
-Re: Input on a change
This is a good point.
I think this change should be fine for the server portion of the code,
since it's designed to be run as a standalone system. But for the
client connection to also call system.exit on such an error is
overreaching for all the reasons listed below.
2012/4/15 Віталій Тимчишин <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I really would not like for any library to perform a System.exit call. This
> would make huge program exit out of sudden (think about j2ee, you may be
> bitten by security manager). Note that there are more or less safe errors,
> like StackOverflowError.
> Also System.exit make testing nightmare. E.g. maven2 silently skips any
> tests after the one that calls System.exit. And everything's green.
> As for me good options are:
> 1) Call user-provided uncaught exception handler. Use the one from the
> thread that created the connection if one is not specified explicity.
> 1) Stop everything, notifying user with a global watcher. If it's possible,
> clean any static state (e.g. restart threads) and allow to restart
> connection.
> In any case, call user code. Good system already know how to react (it may
> want to send email to admin), allow it to perform well.
> Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn.
> 2012/4/13 Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I'm trying to evaluate a patch that Jeremy Stribling has submitted, and I'd
>> like some feedback from the user base on it.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1442
>> The current behavior of ZK when we get an uncaught exception is to log it
>> and try to move on. This is arguably not the right thing to do, and will
>> possibly cause ZK to limp along with a bad VM (say, in an OOM state) for
>> longer than it should.
>> The patch proposes that when we get an instance of java.lang.Error, we
>> should do a system.exit to fast-fail the process. With the possible
>> exception of ThreadDeath (which may or may not be an unrecoverable system
>> state depending on the thread), I think this makes sense, but I would like
>> to hear from others if they have an opinion. I think it's better to kill
>> the process and let your monitoring services detect process death (and thus
>> restart) than possibly linger unresponsive for a while, are there scenarios
>> that we're missing where this error can occur and you wouldn't want the
>> process killed?
>> Thanks for your feedback,
>> Camille
> --
> Best regards,
> Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Ishaaq Chandy 2012-04-16, 03:20
Camille Fournier 2012-04-16, 12:55
Ishaaq Chandy 2012-04-16, 16:52
Camille Fournier 2012-04-16, 17:13


text: We had a wonderful vacation, this was my first trip to Disney World with the grandchildren. Part of what made it so enjoyable was the fact that we stayed on site and this made it so much easier to come and go every day and enjoy all of the attractions. The staff were amazing, the transportation (buses) was very convenient... More