text:
Newbury House Rentals(14)
14 Results
Recent Newbury Reviews
Great Home... Great Area
We had a great time in Newbury this summer - beautiful views, perfect home, and great area. This spacious modern home is set up very well and was very comfortable for our entire family. The layout was perfect to give all our family members their own space. Being in the heart of Sunapee, we were able to take advantage of all the local activities (and lakes). In the evenings, it was great sitting out on the deck, enjoying the hot tub, and taking in the serene environment. House is perfectly situated on a great lot, and this hill top neighborhood is perfect for walks, running, and biking. Mount Sunapee is right around the corner, and is ideal for climbing in the summer and skiing in the winter. We were there when the leaves started turning, and the colors and views were spectacular, especially with a morning cup of coffee. We would recommend for our next stay, or for any family looking for a great place all four-seasons long.
Another Great Trip
Another great stay! Thanks, Bob!
We had such a fantastic time at Well Sweep. The house is gorgeous and welcomes crowds with grace and ease with an open floor plan. When there were slight glitches (pizza oven and water filter) they were dealt with immediately. The Sunapee Inn next door is also a gem. We loved staying there too. Linda and George (Inn owners) treated us like family. The rooms are beautifully appointed (great color schemes) and the breakfasts were scrumptious. My family had an unforgetable 10 days at both places. Can't wait to visit again. Thank you.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
More From
Quarterback Sneak
eBook (ePub): $1.99
Download immediately.
Lita wasn't a football fan. She had no idea who Colton Jefferies really was. She did know that he never seemed to want to go anywhere public. Was it because she wasn't a size 5, or blonde... More > in the land of golden Barbie's? Was he ashamed of his attraction to her? Little did she know the quarterback was preparing to sneak past her defense to give her the happily ever after she'd always dreamed of.< Less
Christmas Miracle
eBook (ePub): $1.99
Download immediately.
Dressed up as Santa at a suburban mall isn't where you'd usually find a Hollywood heartthrob, but it is Leslie's secret passion. It helps him connect to Christmas traditions long... More > gone for him, and maybe even captures the innocence of his childhood once more. The very last thing he ever expected was a precious gift of his own. One that reminded him of the miracles Christmas could bring. One thing was for sure—he wasn't about to let his Christmas Miracle slip away from him, no matter what it took to keep his most precious gift.< Less
Circle of Three
eBook (ePub): $0.99
Download immediately.
Some girls have all the fun, and Bertrice wasn't one of those girls. Plus sized women nick named "Bertie" seemed to be destined to be everyone's friend and no one's love interest. Bertie... More > had to be content taking care of her own needs in her lonely bed. Until she caught someone watching. Jolted out of complacency, Bertie decides it is time get out of the house and start living her life. Going to a Halloween party with the other resident lonely girl at work seemed just the thing. Who knew not only the freaks came out at night? Apparently, so did Fae warriors of the tall dark and panty-dropping variety....< Less
Beautiful Skin
eBook (ePub): $2.99
Download immediately.
Johari Clayborn has given everything she has to building her own cosmetics company, Sparkling Gem. But it isn't enough. The company's going under, and Johari sees no way out of her... More > current predicament than to sell the company to Schöne Haut, the beauty juggernaut owned by the Vollmer family. Rald Vollmer wants nothing more than to be rid of his wife, Helga. On paper, she looks like the perfect foil for his up-and-coming business persona, but in reality she's nothing short of psychotic. Sparkling Gem, and the woman who created it, presents him with the perfect chance to break free of his family's influence. It's just a business arrangement, he tells himself, carefully calculated to give him what he wants. But the better he gets to know Johari, the less he's able to stay emotionally aloof, and what began as a calculated plan rapidly turns into something much, much more personal.< Less
Ride of a Lifetime eBook:
Batten Down the Hatches eBook:
Edge of Sanity eBook:
The Captain's Dog Sitter eBook:
On the Edge eBook:
Giving Thanks eBook:
Top 10 This Weeksee more >
Boychoir 50th
Paperback: $39.49
Barack Obama, Ronald...
Paperback: $15.00
Moon Shadow Takes a Leap
Paperback: $15.95
The Hospitalist
Paperback: $15.99
A Simple Path
Paperback: $6.36
Business Model...
Hardcover: $49.95
Chess Workbook
Paperback: $9.95
S.A.G.E. UNIversity A...
Paperback: $10.00
Paperback: $14.99
Dance Among Elephants
Paperback: $20.00
Age Verification
The page you are attempting to access contains content that is not intended for underage readers.
Please verify your birth date to continue.


text:
Album Rating: 4.0i'm guessing this was before my time because i never get any of the skele references
Album Rating: 3.5Haha, oh yeah. Good ol' Skele used to be the absolute most controversial guy on this site. I'm pretty sure his name will live out through history has such.
yeah. you heard what apparently to him didnt you?
Digging: Saosin - Translating the Name
Album Rating: 4.0did he even jun tho
Album Rating: 3.5What you mean Mort, if i heard what happened to him? Cus i did. Hence the reference lol
oh the Skele escape plan? yeah i think we are talkin bout the same thing
Album Rating: 3.5Das it then.
he got arrested lel
Digging: 2 8 1 4 - ???????
Album Rating: 3.5He did. May I ask how did you come across that information?
someone linked me to an article about him I dont remember who
Even worse than posty? I know he is still around here but I thankfully don't come across him.
Album Rating: 3.5Haha :D
Wait what was this skele stuff?
he got arrested.
lol wtf is this legit? Skele was a total nutcase?
wait why didn't the article mention sputnik?
Album Rating: 4.0www.thewitchiscoming.com
Album Rating: 4.0instagram.com/p/rLe0nSI6kj
Album Rating: 4.0Not confirmed to be new TAS. However:
1) dat guitar tone.
2) acacia puts out a new album ever 2 years. DITOM came out 2 years ago.
3) Vince has said in interviews I've watched that the new album is "done" and "coming soon"
So fucking stoked [2]. DITOM is a hard jam for me.
Album Rating: 4.0Like I said it's not confirmed to be, but all signs point to it
Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


text:
[X] Privacy Policy
BrainBashers uses cookies and by using BrainBashers you agree to our use of cookies.
Q: Do you like your name?
21,515 / 78%
6,101 / 22%
[#22 - Total Votes = 27,616]
[#22 - Total Votes = 27,616]
The BrainBashers Question Of The Week answers are entirely anonymous, and no personal information is recorded against the entries.
Suggest a Question Of The Week:
Have you completed the BrainBashers survey?
This website uses cookies, for more information please view our privacy policy.


text:
News and Events
Smart Devices Pose Dumb Security Risks
Someone has to take responsibility for the security and privacy issues attendant to the Internet of Things. In this guest essay posted on ThirdCertainty, George Japak, managing director of ICSA Labs, a vendor-neutral testing and certification organization, outlines who that should be.
ICSA Labs Certified Products - January 2015
Congratulations to Barracuda Networks, Cyberoam Technologies, F5 Networks, MicroWorld Technologies and Sophos!
Q&A: George Japak of ICSA Labs Offers Advice around NCSA Month
George Japak, managing director of ICSA Labs and Verizon's HIPAA security officer, discusses his thoughts on NCSA month and offers important advice to help enterprises and consumers stay vigilant when it comes to cybersecurity.
Infosecurity Professional - Interview with George Japak
George Japak, managing director of ICSA Labs, discusses testing, certification and security challenges in a Q&A interview with Infosecurity Professional's Joyce Chutchian.
The Flame Reality & Swiss Cheese Security
The worst hack is the one you don't know about
When Ages and Revolutions Converge
One thing that's clear is that viruses evolve in distinct ages and follow patterns. They come into existence in response to some new technology then spread and cause mischief for some years until an extinction-level event occurs and wipes them out briefly. That is, until a new technology breathes life into them again...
Constant Connectivity, Proliferation of Mobile Devices and Applications Will Create More Security Concerns in 2012
ICSA Labs recommends that businesses and consumers guard against 13 security threats in 2012...
Verizon Launches 2011 Data Breach Investigation Report – What Does It Mean for You?
On April 19, Verizon issued its much-anticipated 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR). This report has become the seminal report for the security community, and is eagerly awaited for each year...
Ixia, ICSA Labs, and SonicWALL to Hold Network Security Testing Day; Media Invited
Companies Working Together to Standardize Network Security Testing.
Confused about new Texas Law, Title 10, Section 2059.060? Read the law itself.
The state of Texas recently had a law go into effect (on Dec. 1, 2010) that impacts the security product testing industry, including ICSA Labs. The law has attracted a significant amount of attention, some of which is inaccurate...


text:
|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Darkbridger wrote:
Fortunately, I've already done my part and own both APs. Have you done your part? ;-)
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
The beauty of this discussion is a) that Paizo hedged their answer to this question a few years ago in such a way that there is a possibility that they would do another hardcover (however improbable that possibility may be), and b) if we fans raise up enough stink, Paizo will put out another AP hardcover.
So, really, the tone of this discussion needs to steer away from fantasy to reality.
Crimson Throne is the most logical choice (almost universally praised, 3.5, many volumes out of print).
Second Darkness is a good choice as well, though I think less as likely due to there being more available stock.
I don't know much about Legacy of Fire.
While there would be some good PFRPG AP candidates, they likely wouldn't even think about those until the 3.5 ones have been updated.
My 2 CP.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Played on 03/21 & 22/2015
30 Lamashan 4707
Late last night, Jakardros spoke with our party regarding a desire to reestablish communication with Turtleback Ferry. We agreed to stay on for a while to help with the Black Arrows' diplomatic affairs with the community. Additionally, Mudder, in what can only be described as a post-poison euphoria, became enraptured by battle-strategy discussions with Vale and beseeched the party to allow him to stay a bit to train on learning how to furiously focus, as the Black Arrows do.
I do not understand this concept at all. Just, you know, focus. Concentrate. Why fury belongs in this equation is unbeknownst to me. In fact, I would think that would impair one's ability to focus.
Ah, well. Perhaps dwarves have some sort of attention deficiency of which I am unaware.
Anyway, today has been a rather uneventful day. Aside from watching Mudder glower and swing about his lucern hammer, it has been fairly peaceful.
Oh yes, and so far, it does not appear Mudder has noticed his braid.
31 Lamashan 4707
Jakardros mentioned, almost in passing, that they were unable to find their commander's remains. We recalled coming across Lamatar Bayden's personal effects, and in them, some love poetry.
Because of the drizzly weather, I chose to remain indoors and study these poems for clues.
They're lovely, but unfortunately, they don't offer much other than a general location of where the lovely Miriana may be. She might be in the White Willow in the Shimmer Glens. Perhaps the maiden knows of his whereabouts.
When the weather is less dismal, we may set out.
1 Neth 4707
It still rains. Incessantly.
2 Neth 4704
This weather is atypical for this time of year. Why hasn't it cleared up yet? Yes, we often get rain, but goodness, this is nigh on a deluge.
Perhaps it is just this region of the country to which I am unaccustomed.
3 Neth 4707
Tordag is writing spells, and I find myself curious about his magic. Mine is inherent, just part of me. He explained once that his came from his deity when he prays.
But still, doesn't he just know them after having "learned" them once? It seems duplicitous to me that his Abadar takes away this knowledge that he allegedly gives.
I don't understand religion.
Mudder appears to have mastered the art of being furiously focused. Vale is apparently pleased with him anyhow. There was much hand-shaking and back-slapping. He still has not noticed his braid. I am enjoying this.
In other news, I believe this rain is magical mischief. It feels unnatural.
4 Neth 4704
Since the rain wouldn't let up, we decided to set out this morning.
Immediately upon our arrival to the ferry, there was a blinding downpour, followed by a resounding crack from up river. The dam had broken, and suddenly the town was flooding with water and terrible creatures were floating downriver.
We had managed to fight off a giant constrictor and save a group of school children from being crushed by their shabby old building when suddenly, a gargantuan alien creature shambled, slithered, and swam its way down river, attempting to destroy everything it its path. It essentially crushed the church of Erastil and seemed hell-bent on unleashing its fury upon the town until we made the decision to distract it.
That was a very poor choice.
Furtunately, the creature became weary of us, and the townsfolk mistakenly believed we had chased her off. We learned later that she was the Black Magga, a creature of mostly forgotten legend here in this region. She was speaking Thassilonian.
This is unsettling.
We have decided that the damage to this ancient dam, the disturbing reappearance of a mythic creature, and the unnatural rain are signs of a greater puzzle that must be investigated.
Unfortunately, the missing, lovelorn captain must wait.
On a positive note, while Mudder was incapacitated from his royal beating at the hands (tentacles?) of the Black Magga, I was able to braid the other side of Mudder's beard. He looks a bit like a walrus.
5 Neth 4707
What an interesting day.
We began by heading up to the dam, and we discovered the trail leading up to the stairs marked by skulls and skull runes. With a little help from a comprehend languages spell, I was able to read that the territory belonged to the Skull Taker clan of trolls. I was loathe to bring the news back to my party; despite his new dapper appearance due to walrus braids, Mudder (and Tordag, too, while we're at it) really, really dislikes giant kind.
I fear the blood will never fully wash from those braids. Ah, well. Perhaps blood has some conditioning properties.
Those dwarves just cannot be reasoned with regarding giant kind. When we arrived at the top of the dam and discovered ogres chipping away at the walls, they were both completely careless with their own personal safety. Fortunately, no one slipped and fell to his death.
Unreasonable dwarves.
I suppose, though, their fervor prevented further damage to the severely compromised dam.
After the ogre slaughter, we went to check out the tower located on one side of the dam. Inside, we discovered a nest of those SkullTaker trolls, and I earned myself some dwarven respect when I cast confusion on one of the trolls and caused two of them to fight each other. The dwarves just thought that was fantastic.
On an unrelated note, Mudder finally noticed his braids whilst we were in the troll room. He seems to like them, oddly enough. I overheard him muttering to Tordag and one of the two of them mentioned the word "stylized" which, quite frankly, I didn't even know was a part of their vocabulary.
Well, if it's style they want, I can absolutely give them that. If I could actually convince either of them to regularly bathe, I may be able to dress and style them fashionably and feel comfortable taking the two fo them out in public.
That is probably unfair. Tordag, I believe, bathes a bit more frequently. Mudder, though...Mudder seems to revel in wearing blood splatter. I think he views it as a badge of honor, especially when it's giant blood.
In fact, Mudder and Tordag both laughed at me later when we found the cesspit in which we located a water troll called Papa Grazuul. They allowed me to deliver the coup de grace since I had prepared a shocking grasp spell I hadn't been able to use during battle. Tordag called me giant killer, and Mudder teased me for wiping off my hand after having touched the noxious beast. In disgust, I asked him if he planned to bathe tonight. He laughed and asked "why"?
He was not laughing later when he was nearly beheaded by some sort of construct called a Skull Ripper. That thing was brutal. I am ashamed to say I ran away from it.
At least this was deadlier and scarier than the Yeth Hounds we encountered back in Rova. It feels as though years have passed in these last couple of months.
The construct appeared to be guarding a control room of sorts. Unfortunately, none of us could figure out how to get the flood gates to open. It seemed as though the dam was missing its power source. When we traveled to yet another room in the interior of the dam, we discovered why.
The dam had been operating for decades—probably centuries—by drawing from the life force of two summoned creatures. One of those creatures had been reduced to dust. According to the other withered, frail creature, the first had expired more than fifty years ago. The devil (or demon—I can't keep the evil little things straight) pled with us for his release. We didn't want to do that and cause the dam's critical failure. Without two power sources, though, we weren't going to be able to power the dam.
Well, Tordag was all prepared to do the noble thing and jump right into the summoning circle, but none of us were comfortable with that given that he is our healer. Mudder had already taken a prodigious beating, so he wasn't going to volunteer, and Melda, well, Melda's not the volunteering type. I jokingly suggested we put Ascarthia in the circle as we could just call her back tomorrow. Of course, I was only partially kidding.
Because if nobody else was going to get into the circle, it was going to have to be me.
Now, I would not normally use the word "heroic" to describe myself. But truly, my actions earlier today were truly noble, selfless, and honorable.
Somebody should give me a medal or something.
Obviously, I didn't die. I did, however, feel noticibly weaker than I had earlier in the day.
5 Neth 4707 (continued)
Nearly immediately upon having drained some of my life force, we heard the dam rumble to life and the spillways open, releasing the pent up pressure from millions of gallons of water.
After reactivating the dam, we finished checking over nooks and crannies we had missed previously. We also went back along the original cave pathway we had seen at the start and discovered a guardian ettin. After having fought that dreadful creature, I can honestly say that this ettin was not a very good guardian.
Eventually, we made our way back here to the fort, a little tired but no worse for wear.
Tordag assures me he can restore me to my usual self tomorrow after he has rested and prayed.
Perhaps it is a good thing that Abadar gives even as he takes.
Players Notes: We will have rested and leveled up prior to the next day. Tordag is down one spell: restoration. We plan to go look for the captain.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Played 11-08-2014
28 Lamashan 4707 (continued)
Upon our approach to the barn, we discovered a grim scene. Three of the ogrekin were toying with a deceased human male who'd had a post-hole digger driven through his groin. He was pinned in place, the poor man. One hopes the post-hole digger was used postmortem.
Also inside the barn, we discovered a spider. I can't do justice in words to the sheer immensity of this creature. It quite literally filled the hayloft/prison. I also cannot do justice in words to the sheer immensity of my hatred of spiders. Hatred is inadequate. I detest spiders. Loathe. Abhor. Despise. Abominate.
Consequently, I set it on fire—unfortunately, not before The Abomination did serious damage to our friend Mudder. Poor Mudder looked quite drunk. In fact, I don't even think I've seen ale have this effect on him. Not even the Hagfish water.
Perhaps the only way to intoxicate a dwarf is through poison. But I digress.
In the spider's hovel, we found Vale Temros, Kaven Windstrike, and Jakardros Sovark, imprisoned. Shalelu was quite pleased to find Jakardros, her step father. These three gentlemen were the last of the Black Arrows.
The Black Arrows laid to rest their fallen comrade by building a pyre for him. Then we set the barn and the house of fire.
It has been a good day for fire.
The gentlemen told us the fort had been completely overrun by ogres, so we decided to return to Turtleback Ferry to get the story of what happened to the fort and the Black Arrows. What we got, however, was rather unexpected. Apparently, Kaven was an instrument in Lady Lucretia's plot to overthrow the fort. He told us (under the influence of an elixir of truth) that he had become Lady Lucretia's lover, that she had asked him to get the tattoo, and that she had asked him to delay Jakardros's party in their attempts to get back to the fort. Consequently, it is probable that through his efforts, Kaven made it possible for the ogres to overtake the Black Arrows. Additionally, Kaven told us he had two accomplices who had been travelling to the Paradise Lost with him, but they weren't true conspirators. They hadn't been sucked into Lucretia's plot as Kaven had.
Jakardros, as you can imagine, was quite incensed. He told us that Kaven must be put to death according to the Black Arrow's laws.
Keven's execution will take place tomorrow morning.
It has been a long day. Before we rest Tordag must restore Mudder to his regular strength. I want to see whether or not Mudder realizes I have braided the right portion of his beard while he was poisoned.
29 Lamashan 4707
This morning, Tordag went to witness Kaven's execution while the rest of us went to find out if Lady Lucretia ever came in to Turtleback Ferry (as she told Kaven she would), but everyone in town seems to believe that she perished in the Paradise Lost fire. We believe she staged her own death and is continuing her nefarious recruitment of the greedy elsewhere.
On an unrelated note, but while I am thinking of it—Jakardros and Shalelu seem to be getting along better. I noticed yesterday that they were, for lack of a better word, chilly with each other. Perhaps they've had a chance to talk of some family friction? I am intensely curious to know what is happening, but social protocol does not allow me to ask. Hmmm.
Shortly after the return of the execution party, we set out for the fort. Mudder, Shalelu, and Jakardros went ahead as a scouting party. When we met up at the fort, we devised a plan. We made Vale invisible and cast fly upon him. Then we sent him into the camp with a campfire bead. He flew under a wooden barracks building whereupon he lit the campfire and subsequently set the barracks with a dozen ogres inside on fire. They all died. It would be sad if they weren't all planning to kill us anyway. Also, Tordag and Mudder seem to believe the outright murder of giantkind is something to be celebrated.
I think they're a little bit racist.
After today's encounter, I suppose I can understand why. These ogres are truly awful.
The ogres were everywhere. They had infiltrated the keep and were patrolling the outer boundaries as well. Fortunately, we had taken out their leader quite early, so he was unable to muster the troops against us. That made dispatching the rest of them fairly easy. I say fairly because there were some unusual ogre-folk amongst our combatants: barbarian, fighter, sorcerer. Usually ogres aren't so well trained.
One particularly difficult battle was in the hidden tunnels in the mountain behind the keep. We fought some sort of undead creature that absolutely resisted my attempts to halt him, which is unacceptable. Fortunately, Tordag was able to call upon his deity to smite the creature. There may be something to this whole religion thing.
Particularly troubling, though, was the Lamia Matriarch who disappeared on us. We suspect that she was, in fact, Lucretia from the Paradise Lost, but we have no way of knowing for sure. We were fairly close to slaying her, but she used her dimension door spell to teleport away from us at the close of the battle. We searched all about the fort for her, but she was nowhere to be found.
Jakardros and Vale decided to accompany us back to Turtleback Ferry. Perhaps they can recruit more Black Arrows there.
End of Session Notes
Tordag made his will saves against the negative levels from the thing we fought in the tunnels. We are leveled up and rested. Vale made one of his will saves, but not the other. Consequently, he has one negative level.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
claudekennilol wrote:
Yes, I should have clarified what "that" meant.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
barry lyndon wrote:
Yes, because the constrict special ability states that a creature does constrict damage on a successful grapple check.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Quick question about the Skull Ripper and the order of operation with grapples and the behead ability.
Round 1) Hit with claw, do claw damage, make grapple check, success, do constrict damage.
Round 2) Maintain grapple as a standard action, success, apply pinned condition, do constrict damage and claw damage.
Round 3) Maintain grapple as a standard action, success, continue pin, do constrict and claw damage, do behead special ability.
Does this sound right?
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Other than the explicit instructions to make attacks in descending BAB order, I'm not really sure why this is being made into an issue.
The reality is that it doesn't matter. Attack with your primary hand first. Attack with your off hand first. Interchange between primary and off hand attacks. Who cares. It doesn't matter.
But, if you insist on being sticklers about it, since off hand attacks are "extra" attacks, a natural reading of the rules would imply that all of the off hand attacks would be made once the primary attacks have been completed.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Rynjin wrote:
I would rather have a book that didn't have to have a few extra pages of errata sticking out. If I knew that a new printing was pending, I would wait to buy it until I knew for sure I was getting was the most recent printing.
So, in this case, your desire to have this errata document before the next printing comes out means that I won't buy the product.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
thejeff wrote:
That's fine. I can see the benefits, especially with new players and you can just hand them the first level cards. Less overwhelming. Something about having a physical card for them to handle seems to help.
No duplicate cards? Well what do you really expect? Of course there aren't duplicate cards. This, itself isn't something negative about the cards.
To the best of my knowledge, not all of the spells are in basic. Something like only 100 spells or something like that.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
thenovalord wrote:
Yeah those cards just fill the table we find and more importantly they don't list concentration as a spell parameter
Yeah they do, but it's not entirely obvious: those that list the duration as "Up to X rd/min/hr/whatever" are concentration spells.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Petty Alchemy wrote:
I just want to be able to look up spells more easily. The spell organization in the PHB is terrible (why doesn't it say under the spell which classes get it and when?)
It's not horrible as it is, you just have to realize that you have to reference the class list and then look up the spell rather than page through the spell descriptions.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Purple Dragon Knight wrote:
I am soooooo going to troll my players with this.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Bandw2 wrote:
That's the rub. That you have a melee weapon in hand at the time you make a ranged attack is irrelevant. The discussion isn't about whether you provide flanking for someone else. Nor is it a discussion about whether two or more characters provide flanking for you to trigger an ability. It is a discussion on whether or not you are considered flanking when you make an attack with a ranged weapon.
But no matter. It's apparent by now that you're unwilling to see the argument from my point of view. I've said all that I can say on this subject, and I don't think there is much left to argue.
Go forth and game.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Cevah wrote:
They do not contradict each other. Very simply, you are making that second paragraph to be more than it is meant to be.
I discussed this upthread. Click under the spoiler for "Flanking".
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
RumpinRufus wrote:
Your response is especially cute considering the same can be said about your "argument".
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
MadMage wrote:
When the CRB was written, were any of these extra feats and class abilities that have been discussed in this thread available? No.
So, as far as the CRB is concerned, the only time flanking comes in to play is when you are making a melee attack and you have an ally on the opposite side that threatens your target. The CRB is written from the point of view of someone making an attack, and what requirements need to be fulfilled to be considered flanking your target. For a rogue, these requirements need to be met in order to be considered flanking.
Now we have all these class features and feats in which the attacker doesn't have to be the one actually flanking the target. Well, how do we determine if our target is considered flanked?
Since, according to the CRB the attacker needs an ally that threatens the target and stands opposite, it stands to reason that as long as your target has two (or more) allies which threaten it and stand opposite of each other, the target can be considered flanked.
We also have some feats and/or class abilities that allow allies to be standing in different positions other than directly opposite one another, and the target can still be considered flanked.
Does any of this change how an attack works if the attacker is trying to flank his target? No. At least not in the fact that the attack needs to be made with a melee weapon, and the ally needs to be in a legal position and threaten your target.
This isn't circular logic, it's deductive reasoning.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Cevah wrote:
I'm going to chalk that one up to fatigue. I don't see anything that prevents them from using ranged weapons, per se, though they definately wouldn't get the +2 flanking bonus.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Bandw2 wrote:
Me thinks you didn't actually read my mega-post. If you had, you would have realized that I addressed this issue quite clearly.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Bandw2 wrote:
The point of contention is whether or not you can be considered flanking while wielding a ranged weapon. I think I've pretty much put that argument to bed.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
There have been a number of posts since I was last on here, and I don't have much time, so hopefully I'll be able to address all points with this one post.
CRB, page 197: Flanking:
"Flanking, 1st Paragraph wrote:
When making a melee attack, you get a +2 flanking bonus if your opponent is threatened by [an ally] on its opposite border or opposite corner.
In this picture, we see both Valeros and Kyra flanking a goblin. If Valeros were to attack, he would get a +2 to his attack. Conversely, Kyra would also get a +2 to her attack. They are both equipped with weapons which threaten the target, and are both in the proper position in relation to one another. Additionally, when each attacks, they would be attacking with a melee weapon.
"Flanking, 4th Paragraph wrote:
Only a creature or character that threatens the defender can help an attacker get a flanking bonus.
Consider if Valeros were equipped with a longbow instead. In this case, the goblin is not flanked. Although the goblin does have two enemies directly across from one another, one is equipped with a weapon which does not threaten it.
Valeros does not provide flanking for Kyra's attack because Valeros isn't equipped with a weapon which threatens the goblin.
Conversely, while Kyra is equipped with a weapon that threatens the goblin and is in a location which would normally provide flanking, she does not because Valeros is not attacking with a melee weapon.
Which leads us to:
Flanking, 2nd Paragraph wrote:
When in doubt about whether two characters flank an opponent in the middle, trace an imaginary line between the two attacker's centers. If the line passes through opposite borders of the opponent's space (including corners of those borders), then the opponent is flanked.
Flanking, 2nd Paragraph, Example 1Flanking, 2nd Paragraph, Example 2
A number of people have quoted this paragraph as proof that just because two characters are on opposite sides of a target from one another, this means that they are "flanking". This is not true.
The purpose of this paragraph is so that in those cases in which the position of the two characters isn't precisely opposite from one another, they would still be considered flanking the target for their respective attacks (or providing flanking for the other character's attack).
In the first example, Valeros and Kyra are attacking an ogre. The two are considered to be flanking the ogre because although they are not directly opposite from one another, the 2nd paragraph tells us to draw a line from the center of both squares. Since this line passes through opposite borders, they are flanking.
In the second example, Valeros is equipped with a longspear. Although offset from Kyra, they are still flanking because the line drawn between the center of their squares passes through the opposite borders (including the corner of that border).
In any case, there is no relief from the requirement that a) the attacker must make a melee attack, and b) the ally must threaten the target and be in a legal position in relation to the attacker. As stated previously regarding the 4th Paragraph, just because they are opposite each other (or crossing opposite borders), doesn't mean that they are flanking.
And for the sake of completion:
Flanking, 3rd Paragraph wrote:
Exception: If a flanker takes up more than 1 square, it gets the flanking bonus if any square it occupies counts for flanking.
This paragraph merely tells us that as long as any one of the squares that a large or larger creature occupies is in a legal position, then they are flanking (i.e. large creatures don't have to precisely line up with one another opposite their targets to flank).
Ultimate Combat, page 130: Improved Back to Back:
"UC, page 130: Improved Back to Back wrote:
While you are adjacent to an ally who is flanked and also has this feat, you can spend a swift action to gain a +2 bonus to AC against all flankers until the start of your next turn.
In this example, Kyra is being flanked by two goblins. Both Kyra and Valeros have the feat. Because both have the feat, Valeros can expend a swift action to gain a +2 bonus to AC against the goblins if they decide to attack him.
Note that if either of the goblins were wielding a ranged weapon, then the feat would not apply because Kyra would not be flanked.
APG, page 130: Assault Leader:
APG, page 130: Assault Leader wrote:
Once per day, when the rogue misses with an attack on a flanked opponent, she can designate a single ally who is also flanking the target that her attack missed. That ally can make a single melee attack against the opponent as an immediate action.
In this example Valeros and Kyra are legally flanking a goblin. It is currently Merisiel's turn, and her attack misses. She then directs Valeros to attack as an immediate action.
Merisiel would be able to take advantage of this talent if she was using a ranged weapon as long as her target was flanked by two other allies.
She would also be able to use this talent if she were standing in Valeros' place (and direct Kyra to attack), though only if she were wielding a melee weapon. If she were only wielding a ranged weapon, then she would not because in that situation the target would not be flanked.
Ultimate Combat, page 100: Enfilading Fire:
Ultimate Combat, page 100: Enfilading Fire wrote:
You receive a +2 bonus on ranged attacks made against a foe flanked by 1 or more allies with this feat.
Because the goblin is legally flanked by Valeros and Kyra (and we can assume that at least one of them also has this feat), Merisiel can make use of this feat.
Though, in this case, she could not replace either of her allies because the goblin would not be flanked due to her wielding a ranged weapon.
d20PFSRD.com: Topple Foe:
d20PFSRD.com: Topple Foe wrote:
If you attempt to trip a foe that is larger than you, you gain a +1 bonus on your CMB check to trip the foe as long as an ally with Topple Foe is flanking the foe with you. If multiple allies with Topple Foe are flanking the foe with you, you gain an additional +2 bonus on your CMD check for each additional ally that's flanking the target.
Assuming that all three allies have the feat, during Merisiel's turn, she would get a +3 to her CMB. Though, if she were wielding a ranged weapon, this feat could not be used because the target would not be flanked.
d20PFSRD.com: Amplified Rage:
d20PFSRD.com: Amplified Rage wrote:
Whenever you are raging and adjacent to a raging ally who has this feat or flanking the same opponent as a raging ally with this feat, your morale bonuses to Strength and Constitution increase by +4.
Assuming both characters are orcs or half-orcs, are raging, and have this feat, both get the bonus to STR and CON. If one were wielding a ranged weapon, then the feat would not apply (though they could still gain the benefits if they moved adjacent to one another).
Advanced Class Guide, PRD: Underfoot Assault:
ACG, PRD: Underfoot Assault wrote:
This ability is unique in that it only requires an ally to be adjacent to the foe, not actually threaten it, in order for either of the characters to be considered flanking the foe. Though, they could still only make melee attacks.
CRB, PRD: Sneak Attack:
"CRB, PRD: Sneak Attack wrote:
The rogue's attack deals extra damage anytime her target would be denied a Dexterity bonus to AC (whether the target actually has a Dexterity bonus or not), or when the rogue flanks her target. This extra damage is 1d6 at 1st level, and increases by 1d6 every two rogue levels thereafter. Should the rogue score a critical hit with a sneak attack, this extra damage is not multiplied. Ranged attacks can count as sneak attacks only if the target is within 30 feet.
It's important to point out that just because there is a clause that ranged attacks must be within 30 feet of the target to gain sneak attacks in the same paragraph that says that rogues gain extra damage any time the target is denied Dex or is flanked does not automatically mean that a rogue can sneak attack a target with a ranged weapon just because there is an ally standing opposite of the target. In that situation, as previously stated, the target is not flanked, even though there are two allies standing opposite of one another.
How does Snap Shot fit in?:
Ultimate Combat, page 119: Snap Shot wrote:
While wielding a ranged weapon with which you have Weapon Focus, you threaten squares within 5 feet of you. You can make attacks of opportunity with that ranged weapon. You do not provoke attacks of opportunity when making a ranged attack as an attack of opportunity.
Because this feat allows you to threaten with a ranged weapon, it certainly can change some of the dynamics of the previously mentioned stuff. Though, this is only within the context of if we assume in all of the above examples that Valeros is equipped with a longbow and has the Snap Shot feat, that Kyra, and/or Merisiel could consider the target flanked because Valeros threatened the target.
The feat speaks nothing to whether or not Valeros can consider the target flanked when he is the one attacking with a ranged weapon. Though the argument can be made that the target is legally flanked and could be subject to sneak attack.
OP's question:
OP in OP wrote:
So, a rogue is holding a dagger (threatening) and across from an ally (flanking.) He activates his Cloak of the Hedge Wizard (conjuration) to use Acid Splash against the flanked opponent. He receives no flanking bonus since it's not a melee attack, but he is still flanking and so the Acid Splash does sneak damage, correct?
Does the rogue have Snap Shot? If no, then it's an easy no. If yes, a very soft maybe leaning towards a no to be on the conservative/safe side.
The fact that the rogue is holding a dagger and threatening the target at the time the ranged touch attack is made is irrelevant to this scenario.
Note, the last bit was made while it was late for me, so things were rushed and probably could be worded a bit better if I was more awake.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Crash_00 wrote:
Sure, you can attack with an UAS and gain the benefits of flanking because a) you are making a melee attack, and b) we are assuming that you have an ally that is in a legal position and threatens your target.
Conversely, if it was your ally's turn to attack, they would not receive the benefits of flanking because while you are in a legal position, you do not threaten the target due to you only being armed with UAS.
That in no way means that you can gain the benefits of flanking if you attack with a ranged weapon even though you have an ally threatening your target from a legal position because you are making a ranged attack, not a melee attack. No, you do not get sneak attack damage, because you are not using a legal method of attack to gain the benefits of flanking your target.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
master_marshmallow wrote:
Well, Snap Shot, but that is obviously an exception to the rule.
EDIT: and to be clear, Snap Shot allows you to provide flanking for someone else, not that you'd be able to receive the benefits of flanking by attacking with a ranged weapon.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Crash_00 wrote:
This whole conversation is about whether or not you can apply sneak attack damage to a ranged attack while flanking, right? Then who the f~!@ cares about stuff that doesnt deal with attacking.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
MadMage wrote:
Well, that's fine that you think that, but it flies against what the developers have indicated.
Furthermore, I really find it difficult to understand how one can come to the conclusion that the second paragraph is to be completely divorced from the first paragraph and treated as a wholly separate idea, rather than the notion that the second paragraph is an explanation supporting the first paragraph.
Finally, how can one be attacking a target, be flanking it, yet not get the flanking bonus?
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
fretgod99 wrote:
Cuz internetz?
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
RumpinRufus wrote:
In the CRB and the PRD that I am reading, the second paragraph is an explanation of the first paragraph if there were any confusion on how the first paragraph is derived. This is even noted by the first three words "[w]hen in doubt...".
That still doesn't change the fact that in order to add sneak attack damage, you must ATTACK. Which paragraph discusses making an attack, the first, or the second? And what does that paragraph say?
Suffice it to say, no where in the paragraph that talks about attacking—which we must invariably do if we want to add our sneak attack damage—does it mention anything about ranged attacks.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Bandw2 wrote:
Well there is the catch, because when you are making an attack, flanking IS the bonus. You only get to add the sneak attack damage when you are making an attack, so all of this argument about "qualifying for flanking when not attacking" is a bit of a straw man argument—not "whether or not your target is flanked by two other allies", not "you're in a position to flank, but are not attacking", and certainly not "you're adjacent to an ally who is being flanked by enemies". No, it's "are YOU flanking your target when YOU attack".
So, when you are attacking, and you are flanking someone, you get a +2 to your attack. If something prevents you from getting a +2 to your attack (either an ally is not positioned properly, your ally is not threatening your target, and/or you are not making a melee attack), then YOU ARE NOT FLANKING YOUR TARGET. If you are a rogue and you are not flanking, you do not get to add your sneak attack damage.
EDIT: stupid iPad spacing issues.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Avenka Thalma wrote:
Sorry for being late on this, but I'm new to pathfinder and I was wondering this : if the party splits, and half the party fights and half just do stuff elsewhere, do they also gain xp, or do I split xp just to those present to fight?
It depends, when doing other stuff, are they still contributing to the group or advancing the story in a reasonable manner? If so, I still split it between the whole group.
For example, if they split the party while exploring a dungeon, if group A triggers a fight with some orcs, while group B is discovering new parts of the dungeon, I'll award the orc XP to the whole group as group B is still positively advancing the story for the whole group—and it's likely they'll trigger their own fight anyways.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Bandw2 wrote:
I mean, you do realize that the whole point of the thread is from the point of view of someone making the attack? Specifically, the question had to do with whether or not sneak attack from flanking is applied to ranged attacks.
I completely agree that someone can be considered to be in a flanked position when it is not their turn: the opponents are in a legal position and are wielding weapons that threaten them—in 99.9% of the cases, this means that they will be equipped with melee weapons and are opposite from one another.
This point in no way invalidates the fact that when you make an attack, it must be with a melee weapon to receive the benefits of flanking. Because the rules tell you what kind of attacks receive the benefit of flanking, and I don't see the word "ranged" anywhere within the flanking rules...but I do see the word "melee".
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Cevah wrote:
Separate paragraph? As far as I can read, and I'm sure you read as well, it's all contained in the same sentance. The very first one to be exact.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Please point me to the rules that allow someone armed with a ranged weapon to be able to provide flanking.
I'll give you a hint: there isn't any. You don't "lose" flanking when you have a ranged weapon because you never had it in the first place.
EDIT: I mean, really, this isn't rocket science. I provided a checklist that is literally taken directly from the rules. Where in the rules for flanking does it say that you get it if you attack with a ranged weapon? It. Doesn't.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
James Risner wrote:
Holding a dagger while making a ranged attack is ultimately a moot point, because it is all predicated upon whether or not you are making a melee attack.
More importantly, this argument is even more irrelevant because determining flanking is based upon whether or not your ally threatens your target, not whether or not you threaten your target—in which you're attacking with a melee weapon anyways, so the point is doubly moot.
If you're weilding a dagger, and you have a buddy flanking your opponent, and you decide to throw the dagger at your target instead of stabbing it, you do not receive the benefits of flanking your target...because the target is not flanked at that point...because you are not making a melee attack. No flank, no +2 to attack, no sneak attack bonus.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
When you make an attack, do you receive the benefits of flanking (of which, a rogue's sneak attack is certainly a benefit of flanking. As is the +2 to your attack)?
First, are you attacking with a melee weapon?
If you answered "no" to any of the above questions, you do not receive the benefits of flanking.
* There are feats and/or class abilities which might alter the square you or your ally can be in to satisfy this requirement.
Certainly, there may be exceptions, but I can garuntee with absolute certainty that every "scenario" that has been mentioned so far in this thread can be properly adjudicated by applying these three questions.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
blackbloodtroll wrote:
Are Bluff and Diplomacy considered mind-effecting effects?
My hunch would be no considering there aren't any conditions associated with those skills that I'm aware of. Nor do I see any reason why you couldn't bluff undead or be diplomatic with intelligent undead. My $0.02.


text:
browse markets
help your farmers' market win
contest updates
rules & prizes
Love Your Farmer's Market Contest
25 votes
Old Town Farmers' Market (OTFM)
Scottsdale, AZ
more about Old Town Farmers' Market (OTFM)
top recruiters for
Old Town Farmers' Market (OTFM)
Laura McMurchie
2105 days, 4 hours ago
Great local growers, independent chefs who care about quality and creativity and a great community vibe.
2105 days, 3 hours ago
Variety of vendors offering fantastic products in an energetic part of Scottsdale's downtown.
Walt Pitts
2091 days, 7 hours ago
Love playing music at this market.
most recent votes for
Old Town Farmers' Market (OTFM)
Ingrid Leopold
2040 days, 4 hours ago
Great way to spend a Saturday morning, looking and learning about all the healthy products that is available plus buying fresh vegetables for the next few meals for the week. You meet wonderful people and sample some great product you would probably not buy.
Makenzie Collie
2088 days, 9 hours ago
this is truly a farmers market and not a craft fair! You can actually buy a wide range of goods for a great prices. McClendon's makes it the best. It is great!
Deb Ledford
2090 days, 22 hours ago
First and foremost for the entertainment. Walt Pitts is an extrordinary guitar player. The produce is always fresh and the honey is great. All the vendors are very friendly as well.
Walt Pitts
2091 days, 7 hours ago
Love playing music at this market.
Michael Ross
2098 days, 3 hours ago
2101 days, 5 hours ago
fabulous locally grown produce, chef demos, great food booths, great location...
Dee Wood
2102 days, 51 minutes ago
Charming local area and friendly people.
Steve Thompson
2103 days, 1 hour ago
Great setting, fresh breads, organic fresh vegetables and other delights that support the local community.
Teresa Pollard
2104 days, 6 hours ago
Everything is supurb and the people are great. There is always a wide variety of fresh local items and many provide family recipes to boot!
Tiana Blank
2104 days, 20 hours ago
I support OTFM because it supports our community and our health as well as the environments.
view all 25 votes
ads keep care2 free
Select a service:
sender info:
your name:
your email:
recipient info:
recipient's address(es):
Separate multiple e-mail addresses by a comma. You can send up to 100 recipients.
personal message
Hello, I saw this on Care2 and thought you'd like it as well. Care2 is the largest and most trusted information and action site for people who care to make a difference in their lives and the world.
We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.
About Care2
About LocalHarvest


text:
Does anyone have a book on Staffordshire figures?
What can you tell me about this? Thank you for your help.
To me, it looks like the staffordshire pottery that is called Pearl Ware. I found a figure of a dog that had the same base.
Pearl Ware is a little less "primitive" than some of the other staffordshire. Also, staffordshire was made by many different potters...so was mainly the name of an area...I think. Early pieces aren't marked. The boy's hat is open, so I was thinking spill vase...which is for little sticks or cones of paper to transfer fire to lamps.
The eyes, the softness of the molding, the brightness of the gold and the strange colors make me say "made in Japan...sold with a sticker which is now gone.
But again I( am not touching it and feeling the weight and the roughness of the unglazed portion.....which is also not typical of old Staffordshire.
Linda C
Spill vases would have been in use mainly before 1850 before friction matches came into popular use. There are lots dated later than that of course but that was the prime period.
Frankly I think It looks more like a candlestick.
It's just not typical...the molding too soft, the colors not right, the features look a tiny bit "Asian", the glaze a little too shiny and the bottom atypical. Sorry if that's not what youw anted to hear. but you asked...
There also were a lot of Japanese porcelain figurines...unmarked...but made of porcelain not pottery. I saw them all the time at auctions when I first started buying some 45 or more years ago. I haven't seen any lately. Your piece looks very like those.
But whatever....just remember a rose by any other name smells as sweet....if you like that's all that counts.
Linda C
Early Staffordshire figures crazed little, if at all. That greyish even crazing suggests your figure is either not Staffordshire or is a 20th c. issue. However, the high gloss that your images seem to show would not be typical to 20th c Staffs.
The extreme lack of detail and colour also suggest that this figure did not originate in the Staffordshire potteries. And the eyes. Well, Staffs eyes ARE pretty funny looking, as if an 8 year-old had drawn them on. Staffs eyes tend to look either like "Charlie Brown" character eyes, or have a strangely feline feel. This object looks almost as if an academic had tried to paint in the primitive manner. I'm not sure it's Japanese but its likely date of manufacture, lack of detail and hastily applied colours would support a 20th c. Japanese origin.


text:
W.Va. police flush out suspect hiding in Port-A-Potty
The Associated Press
MOUNDSVILLE, W.Va. — Police looking for a purse snatcher were able to flush the suspect out from the portable toilet where he was hiding.
"A Port-A-Potty is not a good place to hide," police Chief James Kudlak said Wednesday. "There's only one way out."
Johnny Snodgrass, 21, apparently matched the description of a man caught on videotape at a store where an 89-year-old woman's purse was stolen in March and from a nearby video poker establishment where her wallet was found, police said.
The thief got away with about $45.
Acting on a tip, police went to a construction site where Snodgrass was working on Monday to question him, but he ran into the portable restroom. Officers yelled for him to come out and he soon complied, police said.
Snodgrass was being in jail on $5,000 bond on Wednesday. He's scheduled to appear before a magistrate on April 25.
Kudlak said Snodgrass claims he is innocent.
Court officials said Snodgrass did not yet have an attorney.
Copyright 2015 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Recommended Bizarre Beat
Ala. man shoots at police with bow and arrow, prompts standoff
Cops: Pa. suspect left behind credit card used to jimmy garage door
Lawyer says Calif. kidnapping wasn't a hoax, boyfriend was drugged
Police seek remedy for NC neighbor who stands at his door naked
Join the discussion
to comment
W.Va. police flush out suspect hiding in Port-A-Potty
PoliceOne top 5
- 1 P1 Humor Corner: 25 signs that you're a cop
- 2 Video: Actress apologizes after dash cam refutes claim her son was racially profiled
- 3 Wis. trooper, suspect, motorist killed in shootings
- 4 Video: Ariz. cop escapes death as gunman attempts to sneak up behind him
- 5 Suspect dead, 8 cops injured in Ariz. melee


text:
1973 Ford Mustang The 1973 Mustang was the last of the first generation of America's most iconic Pony Car. Own this driver-quality example today and... More
For sale in our St. Louis showroom is a lovely 1973 Ford Mustang convertible. There is no question the Mustang may be the... More
For sale in our St. Louis showroom is a very sharp 1973 Ford Mustang Mach 1. This is a true Mach 1 complete... More
1973 Ford Mustang convertible, V8 automatic, power steering, 351 Cleveland motor, good condition, runs great, sacrifice at only $8,000.... More


text:
|IPO Date:
|Sep 11, 2014
|Fund Manager:
Universal Pictures was officially founded in 1912 when Carl Laemmle's Independant Motion Picture Corporation joined forces with a handful of other production companies. Operating out of Los Angeles, Universal's first production was The Dawn of Netta. In 1915, the studio founded Universal City in the San Fernando Valley, marking the first time a city had been founded for the sole purpose of producing movies. Currently the oldest operating studio in the country, Universal fostered such early film legends as John Ford, Irving Thalberg, and Erich von Stroheim. MCA took controlling interest in the company in 1962. Since then, Universal has passed through the hands of the corporations Seagram and Vivendi, soon to be followed by General Electric in 2003. Recent modern classics include 1982's E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial and 1993's Schindler's List.
Universal Studio Fund will invest in films distributed domestically by Universal Pictures and Focus Features.
Studio Funds delist and relist annually in September.
Fund Manager:
Initech aka Milton Waddams has been playing HSX since forever and once sold a H$500 million port back to the exchange for real $ and some sharp swag. Milton was a collator for Initech until his office mysteriously burned down. His portfolio recently topped H$1 Billion, cracked the top 2000 and is just outside the top 1%.
5 Flights Up (RALEX)2 short
6 Miranda Drive (6MRDR)2 long
A Little Chaos (ALTCH)1 short
A Monster Calls (AMCAL)1 short
Asteroids (ASTRD)1 long
Ballers (BALLR)1 short
Bastille Day (BSTLD)1 long
Brilliance (BRLNC)1 short
By the Sea (BYSEA)1 long
Cop Car (COPCR)6 long
Crimson Peak (CRMSP)1 short
Curve (CURVE)2 long
Dambusters (DAMBS)1 long
Desperados (DSPDO)1 long
Despicable Me 3 (DESM3)1 long
Everest (EVRST)1 long
Fifty Shades Darker (50SH2)1 short
Fire (FIRE)1 long
Flanimals (FLANM)1 long
Furious 7 (FAST7)99,337 long
G (GRAVT)1 long
God of War (GODWR)2 long
Gypsy (GYPSY)1 long
Hail, Caesar! (HAILC)1 short
Highwaymen (HWMEN)1 long
Home (HOME1)2 long
Hot Wheels (HOTWH)1 long
Incarnate (NCRNT)1 long
Indian Summer (INSUM)1 short
Insidious: Chapter 3 (NSID3)99,089 long
Jekyll (JEKYL)1 long
Jurassic World (JURA4)300 long
Kojak (KOJAK)2 long
Krampus (KRMPS)1 short
Kung Fu (KUNFU)1 long
Legend (LEGEN)1 short
Let's Do This (LTSDO)1 long
Lost for Words (LFWRD)1 short
Lowriders (LOWRD)1 long
Major Matt Mason (MASON)1 long
Mamma Mia 2 (MAMI2)1 long
Maps to the Stars (MAPST)100,000 long
Mass Effect (MSEFC)1 long
Midnight Delivery (MDLVR)1 short
Midnight Run 2 (MIDR2)1 long
Minions (MNION)175 long
Moby Dick (MOBYD)1 long
Monster High (MONHI)1 long
My Wild Life (MYWLF)1 long
Neighbors 2 (NEIB2)9 long
Old St. Louis (OLSTL)1 long
On Chesil Beach (CHESL)1 short
Pacific Rim 2 (PACR2)1 long
Pitch Perfect 2 (PTCP2)61 short
Race (RACE)1 long
Reincarnate (REINC)1 long
Ride Along 2 (RDLO2)9 long
Rocketman (RCKTM)1 long
Rosaline (ROSAL)1 long
Scarface (SCARF)1 short
Search Party (SRCHP)1 long
Section 6 (SECT6)1 short
Selfless (SLFLS)9 long
Sinatra (SINAT)1 long
Sinister 2 (SINI2)99,040 long
Sisters (TNEST)1 long
Spaceless (SPACL)1 long
Spectral (SPTRL)2 long
Stephanie (STEPH)1 short
Stephanie (STEPH)100,000 long
Steve Jobs (SJOBS)1 long
Suffragette (SUFRG)1 long
Sweet Valley High (SVHI)1 long
Ted 2 (TED2)164 long
Term Life (TRMLF)1 long
The 39 Clues (39CLU)1 long
The Birds (BIRDS)1 long
The Bourne 5 (BORN5)1 long
The Danish Girl (DANSH)100,000 long
The Dirt (TDIRT)1 long
The Forest (FORST)1 short
The Great Wall (GRTWL)2 long
The Huntsman (SWHT2)1 long
The Insane Laws (NSLAW)1 long
The Knife (KNIFE)1 long
The Mummy (MUMY4)1 long
The Purge 3 (PURG3)1 long
The Raven (TRVEN)1 long
The Social Life (HPRFC)1 long
The Trap (TTRAP)1 short
The Veil (TVEIL)1 long
TMI (TMI)1 long
Trainwreck (TRWRC)1 long
Trash (TRASH)2 long
Triplets (TRPLT)1 long
Unfriended (CYBRN)99,081 long
Van Helsing (VANHL)2 long
Visions (VISIN)2 long
Wanted 2 (WANT2)1 short
Warcraft (WARCF)1 short
Wicked (WICKD)1 long
Fifty Shades of Grey $160M... (50SHD.BW)20,000 short
Furious 7 - Opening Weekend (FAST7.OW)99,125 long
Furious 7 H$110 Call (FAST7.CA)20,000 long
Antibody – Oct 2, 2013
[UNIVX] will be able to... Read »
Buy BONDS 21 – Sep 9, 2013
It's cash out day for the... Read »
afranco158 – Jul 13, 2012
[UNIVX] [EWRIG] [WSEND] Read »
RazorHawk – Jun 7, 2011
Fund Week Summer 2011: Studio... Read »
RazorHawk – Jan 15, 2011
Fund Week Winter 2011: Studio... Read »
StarBondsFund BUY Now Jets 9-2 – Dec 1, 2010
Top Percentage gain was... Read »
Teabagger – Jul 1, 2010
LOL. Yes, my name is a joke,... Read »
RazorHawk – Feb 20, 2010
Fund Week: Studio Funds (The... Read »
Universal Studio Fund (UNIVX)
Change TodayCurrent Value
Shares Held Long on HSX: 23,633,184
Shares Held Short on HSX: 1,843
Trading Volume on HSX (Today): 145
|This Week
|This Month
|This Season
|This Year
What is a: Fund®, Status, Change Today
Think you have what it takes to manage a Movie Fund? If you have a portfolio worth over H$100 million, then submit your fund idea proposal to email@example.com.


text:
New day. New Daily Deals. Get them before they are gone!
Can't find what you're looking for? Shop all ink and toner cartridges by brand
New Customer ? Start Here.
New day. New Daily Deals. Get them before they are gone!
Item: 50382 Model: 17214BRN
Euro Style™ Vinnie-B bar stool has durable welded chrome steel legs and footrest. Stool in brown leather is easy to clean and measures 39" x 17" x 20", sold as set of 2.
|Seat Height
|Arm Design
|Bar Stool Features
|Foot Ring / Bar
|Bar Stool Type
|Solid Back
|Furnishing Color
Baxton Studio Graymoor dark brown modern bar stool having a glossy silver nail head trim features long lasting wooden frame and ...
Baxton Studio Cleto dark brown full leather bar stool perfect for a pub or a kitchen lets you lean back comfortably with a broad ...
Powell® Sleek brown leather bar stool with brass foot rest features upholstered seat and back enhancing comfortable seating that ...
Seat Height: Bar.Frame Material: Wood.Frame Finish: Black.Seat Material: Faux leather.Style: Contemporary.Overall Width Side to ...
Flash Furniture Dual height counter/barstool in brown color measuring 24 1/2" 29" x 15 1/2" x 15 1/2" has metal base and footrest ...
This Web site is intended for use by US residents only. See International Sites. See our delivery policy for full details. Copyright 1998-2014, Staples, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


text:
Can benicar hct cause weightgain?
- Posted:
- 29 Aug 2010 by freddy57
- Topics:
- benicar, benicar hct
Answers (1)
i would like to meet people on Benicar to see how are they doing! I have the same concern about weight gain
Dealing with the loss of my husband and legal issues with his family I was getting low on my benicar prescription - started cutting them in half and then every other day or so to wean myself. I was off the drug for for about 9 months and subsequently lost 20 pounds. About 2 months ago I started getting headaches frequently and checked my bloodpressure (which was elevated) so I decided that maybe I should resume taking the benicar. As soon as I started taking the drug again my weight started to creap up about a pound each week. There were no other changes in my life... eating the same... exercising the same... the only difference was the drug. I am fixing to wean myself off of it again just to see if the weight comes off again.
I have been taking Benicar for 2 months and have gained 15lbs
Further Information
Search for questions
Still looking for answers? Try searching for what you seek or ask your own question.
Similar questions
Benicar HCT - patient assistance programs for benicar?
I don't have insurance for perscriptions and can't afford 104.00 a month for my medicine. I am looking for an assistance program the the ...
1 answer • 11 Aug 2009
Can valturna 150mg/160mg be taken with benicar HCT 40 mg/12.5 mg?
can bystolic 10 mg tablet be substituted with benicar HCT 40 mg/12.5 mg?
1 answer • 14 May 2010
Will Benicar HCT alter ones personality?
My husband has become very restless, tired and argumentive since taking this medicine. Is this a normal side affect?
1 answer • 30 Aug 2010
Benicar HCT - how do I get financial assistance for Benicar?
My insurance with the State and I an unemployed & have no money to oay for it.
8 answers • 3 Dec 2010
Will a 50 mg tablet Losartan affect vision? Or at 55, is middle age just advancing on me?
Have switched from Benicar HCT to Benicar (water portion didn't seem to have any effect) and after observing some nusiance ED with Benicar ...
1 answer • 23 Sep 2011