text:
by Jim Fetzer, Leuren Moret, and Christopher Busby
HEAVY FIRE POWER WAS USED IN FALLUJAH IN 2004: U.S. Marines fire Nov. 11, 2004, on Fallujah with a 155 mm Howitzer. One of the weapons originally designed for this artillery piece was a tactical nuclear weapon (that could include a neutron warhead) designed by Samuel Cohen, to be fired in eastern Europe on Soviet troops during President Ronald Reagan's term in office. [Photo: Lance Cpl. Samantha L. Jones]
On Friday, 28 October 2011, it was my honor to host Leuren Moret and Christopher Busby as my guests on "The Real Deal", an internet radio program broadcast on M/W/F from 5-7 PM/CT over revereradio.net. Leuren Moret is an independent geoscientist who has done expert studies on the Fukushima disaster, radiation problems around the world including depleted uranium. Dr. Christopher Busby is a visiting biomedical studies professor at the University of Ulster and is the co-author of reports about the effects of depleted uranium in Iraq especially in relation to Fallujah. What Busby found much to his surprise was not DU but enriched uranium instead.
The interview was extraordinary on many counts. During the first hour, Leuren reported on the latest research about Fukushima and laid out a background for understanding the issues that she and Busby and I would discuss during the second hour. It has become apparent from Busby's research that a new kind of bomb–which seems to be a neutron bomb–has been used in Fallujah, but also in other areas, including Lebanon.
As though that discovery were not astonishing enough, listening to him, it struck me that this same weapon may have been used to destroy the Twin Towers, an explanation for which has remained elusive and where alternative theories about the possible use of mini-nukes, directed energy weaponry, and other causal mechanisms have been widely discussed–or, in some cases, actually suppressed. So there are linkages of evidence and causation that tie together the commission of war crimes in Iraq with mechanisms of destruction that may have brought about the near-total conversion of two massive, 500,000 ton buildings into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
We know that nanothermite does not have the capacity to bring about these effects, even though it has many staunch advocates. So what we have to learn from Christopher Busby may not only expose the existence of a new weapon of mass destruction but also provide a key to understanding what happened on 9/11. The transcription of the second hour of the program (published here) was done by Jeannon Kralj, to whom we are indebted for the excellence of her work. The images and captions were courtesy of Leuren Moret. I plan to have the first hour published tomorrow and will provide a link to the audio file as soon as it becomes available, which it has just become.
The Real Deal Radio Show (28 October 2011)
Host: Jim Fetzer: James Fetzer Ph.D. Guests: Dr. Busby: Christopher Busby, Ph.D. Leuren Moret: Leuren Moret B.S., M.A., PhD (ABD) HOUR TWO (transcribed by Jeannon Kralj)
Jim Fetzer: This is Jim Fetzer, your host on "The Real Deal", continuing my conversation with Leuren Moret and now we have been joined by Professor Christopher Busby who is a visiting biomedical studies professor at the University of Ulster and is the co-author of reports about the effects of depleteed uranium in Iraq especially in relation to Fallujah. Chris, welcome to "The Real Deal".
Dr. Busby: Yes, hello.
Jim Fetzer: Please do tell us about the results of your studies and the effects of the depleted uranium.
Dr. Busby: Okay, well, I've done two studies with colleagues in Iraq of the town of Fallujah, which I am sure everybody knows was attacked by US-led forces in 2004, and there was an enormous amount of fire-power used then. And following that there's been a lot of talk about increases in cancer and congenital malformations and various other conditions, but nobody had ever done any proper epidemiology or scientific study. So it was all anecdotal, although it had been reported in a lot of media. So a colleague of mine, Malak Hamden, decided to get involved and she contacted me and together we developed an idea to conduct an epidemiological study.
This was in 2010 and we organized a team of people in Fallujah to visit various houses and set up a randomized group of people in houses to tell us how many people there were, sexes, ages and so forth, and how many cancers they had and what the population was and so forth. And that study was published in the International Journal of Environmental Public Health, a Swiss journal, in 2010. And what it showed was that there was an enormous increase – there was – everybody had been right – all the anecdotal evidence was actually borne out. There was a very big increase in cancer in that population, highly statistically significant, and also there was a big increase in infant mortality and mostly driven by congenital disease, and there was a change in sex ratio, that is to the number of boys born to the number of girls, which is very indicative of a genomic or genetic effect on the sperm [in men] or the eggs of the women.
TOXIC ZONES IN IRAQ: High risk areas contaminated with depleted uranium and other toxins from 30 years of war have left large areas of environmental ruin. The largest towns and cities account for 25% of the contaminated areas. Higher rates of cancer and birth defects have been reported at these sites. Contaminated agricultural lands in southern Iraq have caused a decline in the health of the poorest people living in those parts of the country.
Recently a severe drought has decreased the water flowing in the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers by 70%, causing additional unprecedented environmental disaster. In October 2010, news sources in Baghdad Province reported 1 billion cubic tons of garbage had been dumped into the Tigris River and was increasing every day. [Sources: Chulov, M., "Iraq littered with high levels of nuclear and dioxin contamination, study finds", Guardian, January 22, 2010. Kamal, F. "One million cubic tons of garbage dumped in Tigris River", AZZAMAN.COM, Oct. 28, 2010]
And so there was evidently some other cause in order to answer to the fact that the levels of cancer were higher than had been reported following Hiroshima. So we're talking about some sort of agent which causes massive genetic damage in a population. And of course everyone said 'well it must be depleted uranium.' But of course this was an epidemiological study so we didn't we couldn't say anything about depleted uranium or what it was.
But in order to investigate it, we then decided to go ahead and have a look at a group of parents of children with congenital malformations. And so one of the team who was a pediatrician at Fallujah General Hospital organized 25 fathers and 25 mothers of children with serious congenital malformations, many of these died of course, and took hair samples from these people and we analyzed those hair samples using quite sophisticated technique, or Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICPMS). And we looked at 52 elements in the hair samples of these people and we found quite large increases in a whole range of elements but most of them were innocuous, things like calcium and aluminum and magnesium, which are not likely to cause congenital malformations.
In fact, the only thing that we found apart from uranium that might have been implicated was mercury. But the source and levels of congenital malformations that we had found, and in fact there is another paper which hasn't been published yet which does show these levels at very high levels of congenital malformation. The only thing that could explain it was uranium.
FALLUJAH: LARGE INCREASES IN CONGENITAL BIRTH DEFECTS AFTER 2004 ATTACK [Source: Friday, December 31, 2010 BBC interview on the Fallujah Epidemic of Birth Defects] BBC VIDEO: Fallujah Epidemic of Birth Defects BBC interview:
[youtube 8EN6UcFAAeQ ]
Now enriched uranium is a material that should only be found in a nuclear power station or inside an atomic bomb. So to find it in the hair of the parents of these children with congenital malformations was really astonishing. So we then went to look to see how this could be, and to cut a long story short, we concluded from various patents from the US patent office that we received from physicists, that it was quite entirely likely that there was a new secret weapon being used, an anti-personnel weapon of some sort which contained enriched uranium or else generated enriched uranium.
And so there are basically two possibilities. One is that they are using this enriched uranium. It's only mildly enriched uranium, to cover their tracks, so that afterwards nobody can come to them, you know, with a whole trail of people with cancer and congenital disease and say 'Hey look, we're going to sue you" because then they can say "Well, you know, there's no depleted uranium there.' And the alternative – which is sort of science fictional and which is entirely possible – I have to say, which is that they have developed a sort of neutron device which uses enriched uranium as part of its components to generate neutrons.
And the way it does this is to dissolve tritium in uranium powder. Like deuterium, heavy hydrogen is very soluble in uranium, and when it is compressed, when the saturated solution is compressed, you can get a cold fusion reaction which produced helium-4 and neutrons, and so that too is a possibility. But of course we don't know what the answer is. And interestingly enough, and also connected to this, is the fact that we know from various papers that have been published that the Gulf War veterans, the US Gulf War veterans, have also had a very high and statistically significant increase in congenital malformations in their children. But the uranium source of this has been excluded on the basis of urine tests which show that there is no depleted uranium. But of course, what we have discovered is that there wouldn't be depleted uranium because it is enriched uranium.
CANCER RATE INCREASES IN BASRA, IRAQ 1993-2001: Dr. Jawad Al-Ali, an oncologist in Basra, Iraq, reported large increases in cancer and leukemia in Basra following the 1990 Gulf War, and the introduction of depleted uranium weapons to the battlefield by the US govt. Cancer rates in Fallujah from the 2004 attack are even higher than Basra, and many times higher than after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. [Source: Dr. Jawad Al-Ali, Basra, Iraq]
Jim Fetzer: Well Chris, this is fairly astonishing news.
I must say, I am taken aback in that the belief that it has been depleted uranium that has caused these problems, so widespread, so ubiquitous, that your findings are truly astonishing, I think even revolutionary, in altering the paradigm with which we view these matters where the American government, once again, is complicit. Whereas the attack on Fallujah obviously involved war crimes on a massive scale in the use of chemical and other weapons that were banned under the Geneva Conventions, now we're talking about a whole new family of weapons that have devastating effects and that alter the genetics of the civilian and military population, which can have incalculable consequences from an evolutionary point of view. I am stunned.
Dr. Busby: Yes, well so were we. But I have to say that we weren't absolutely astonished as we might have been because we had already turned up enriched uranium in a bomb crater in Lebanon in 2006, and there are certainly no differences about that in two separate laboratories using two entirely different techniques. So in one laboratory they used ICPMS, which is this method we just used. But in another one, they used the old fashioned but much more certain method which is called alpha spectroscopy.
And so in that laboratory, they also found enriched uranium. So there is no doubt that enriched uranium is being used as some component of some modern weapons system. And the other thing about it is that people are so "Oh well you know they use…, why do you find depleted uranium because there are no tanks." And of course the answer is that it is an anti-personnel method of attack. It is not a tank buster at all. It is a new system and I think that this is the message to the planet, that there is a secret new system and it is extremely dangerous.
LARGE INCREASE IN FALLUJAH BIRTH DEFECTS WERE REPORTED AFTER 2004 US ATTACKS: Defects in newborns were 11 times higher than normal, "war contaminants" from new exotic weapons including nuclear weapons, are the probable cause. [S0urce: Chulov, M., "Research links rise in Falluja birth defects and cancers to US assault", The Guardian (UK), Dec. 30, 2010]
Jim Fetzer: Yes, extremely dangerous, and you are observing it was found in Lebanon, where to the best of my knowledge, there was not an American incursion but rather an Israeli, and that the Israelis may even have developed this weapon or been provided with it by the American government.
Leuren Moret: Actually what happened is that during the attack, in the middle of the Israeli attack on Lebanon, the US sent 800, rushed, 800 special bombs, and I have photos of them on planes in England and landing and taking off in Scotland and also Ireland. And they expedited delivery of these special bombs to the Israelis to use on Lebanon in the second half of that attack, and I believe that those may have been the source of this exotic weapons signature that Dr. Busby has just mentioned.
Jim Fetzer: Chris, had you heard those reports before possibly …?
Dr. Busby: Well I know that the Americans did supply bombs to the Israeli because there was a lot of fuss when they were landing in Scotland. The Scottish people wanted to prevent them using the airports there as a staging place for refueling in order to supply the Israelis because there was a lot of opposition to that particular war, which was another illegal war [unintelligible] I think it was in this report. The crater that we found in Khiam (Lebanon) that my colleague, that actually I sent my colleague out there to look at, was in fact radioactive. So not only did we find DU but we found enriched uranium in it.
The reason that we went there in the first place was that one of the local physicists who had been looking at the various effects of these weapons in Lebanon detected the radiation signature of this particular crater was alarmingly high, so that's why we went to see why it was high. Now the radiation levels fell rapidly over about six weeks and went back to normal. Now that would be a signature for a neutron device because what happens is that the neutrons from the device cause an increased level of gamma radioactivity due to neutron activation of substances in the soil, but these are fairly short-lived, and so they do drop off over a short period of about three to six weeks, so that would fit in with that possibility.
TURBOCHARGED "SUPERBOMBS" Reactive Materials can be used to replace inert metals in munitions, all different kinds of weapons. Even Explosively Formed Penetrators, or EFPs, the "superbombs" used to such deadly effect in Iraq and Afghanistan, are candidates for the reactive materials revolution. [Source: Hambling, D., "Reactive Revolution: Turbocharged 'Superbombs'", WIRED, May 9, 2008]
Jim Fetzer: Now Chris, perhaps you can confirm my impression that one of the benefits of these neutron weapons is that they kill people but don't damage property.
Dr. Busby: Well that's why they were developed, of course. Yes, that's correct, that is why they were developed. I want to be very cautious about all of this. I have talked to a number of physicists who say that this is possible, who say that the model seems reasonable, but we have no real evidence apart from the existence of enriched uranium [I-235] in this crater in Lebanon, deuterium, anomalously high levels of radioactivity caused by neutron activation, and the rest is surmisable.
Jim Fetzer: Well, on the other hand, if you apply the principle of inference to the best explanation, if you consider alternative hypotheses about the possible cause and calculate the probability of the effects if those causes were indeed what had brought about those effects, the causes with the highest probability have the highest degree of evidential support …
Dr. Busby: Yes, of course. But the thing about this is that it is entirely possible also that what they are doing is just disposing of a load of old nuclear warheads. As you know, they have to have a lot of decommissioning of nuclear weapons and there are significant amounts, very large amounts of enriched uranium in those nuclear weapons, and so the point is that that stuff would have to normally be disposed of as nuclear waste.
Now that would be a simple matter for them to just mix it in with depleted uranium until you got a mix which just took you on the correct side of the dose limits to the soldiers. That's the way these people think. I can tell you. They would mix it in so that the soldiers under some risk model approach would have less than one millisievert in a year or whatever the risk level is, and that would be a very neat way of getting rid of all their warheads without having to find somewhere to put them which would cost them money. At the same time, of course, they could use them in this new weapon.
Now it doesn't have to be a neutron weapon. The patents that we've found include a weapon where the uranium is part of an explosive, and then this explosive is used in a shaped charge, a sort of shaped appliance so that it shapes and directs the actual explosion power. Now there are various missiles and tank styles that are called TOW and these are directed-charge weapons.
And I've seen pictures of these taken at tanks. They fly over the top of the tanks and they suddenly go "bang" and this enormous directed charge goes downward on to the top of the tank and atomizes it. And these are quite small missiles. So there is an alternative explanation so it doesn't have to be something nuclear.
Jim Fetzer: Goes down on the top of the tank and atomizes it?
Dr. Busby: Yes, yes, it does. It's the most extraordinary thing, that the missile doesn't hit the tank – it flies over the top of it and a sort of [shaped] charge shoots out from the bottom of the missile and blows the tank apart from the top. Jim Fetzer: Could such a weapon then be used on steel structure high-rise buildings?
Dr. Busby: Well you could make a directed charge weapon that could do anything, and some of these weapons, of course…I think the point is…This has been described in various books about the battle of Fallujah. It's not me saying this. But they do have these missiles that can blow down walls, and the problem was that these guys, what they call "the insurgents," were inside buildings and were shooting out through windows and the easiest way to get them would be to just completely demolish the wall. So these directed-charge weapons are capable of doing that, which is to blow the wall away, presumably when the wall comes down with them.
So there are lots and lots of modern weapons. Another thing about this is that a lot of very strange wounds have been found. You know there is actually a group of doctors who are trying to figure out how these wounds have been found. They are not the sort of wounds you get in combats in historic wars. They're entirely new. So there is some sort of new weapon out there, and I think probably it contains uranium – would be my guess.
FALLUJAH BURNS: During the 2004 US attack on Fallujah, strange wounds and burns were reported by Doctors treating Iraqi war casualties. These types of wounds had never been seen before. Jim Fetzer: Could you sketch some of these wounds so that we would have a better idea of what you are talking about?
Dr. Busby: There are people who have been found that for no apparent reason their bodies are slightly swollen and they cut the bodies open to look inside and found nothing at all which could produce pain–explain why they are dead. Now this could be the consequence of a thermobaric weapon. Now uranium explosives have been associated with the development thermobaric weapons because what these weapons do, instead of their "bang" very sharply with a kind of sharp shock wave, they produce a very slow shock wave, so the shock wave goes out and then it sucks back into a vacuum. It just destroys people by its sudden change in pressure. It sucks their lungs out, if you like.
So that could be one of them. Now I took photographs of a boy who was hit by one of these weapons and there's a stripe across his chest which is like a black stripe. The rest of him is perfectly all right. There is no problem with him, but where the stripe crosses his arm, the arm has been completely charred and its like you can just see two sticks where the bones are still there but they're carbonized. So this guy who has obviously standing by a window and some enormous heat has come through the window and has just totally wiped out parts of him and other parts are completely unharmed. There are a number of these pictures around which really don't make sense unless you have some kind of new weapon that we don't fully understand [yet] . . .
Jim Fetzer: Chris, this is nauseating, I mean, man's inhumanity to man, you know, seems to be on blatant display here.
Dr. Busby: It's an interesting philosophical point really, how these people can do it. But you see they put themselves in a different universe. They just sit there with their pencils and paper and they kind of just see it as a . . . I don't know, like an abstract plan on how to kill somebody. They don't see them as real people.
Leuren Moret: It's nothing personal, Chris. It's nothing personal. It's just another industry like making shoes to them.
Dr. Busby: I saw a very interesting video about three women who were walking along, Palestinians as well, and they were looking at a drone, one of these Israeli drones, and then two of the young daughters turned to the mother and smiled at her and sort of laughed and then pointed to it, and then the drone wiped them out. It sort of sent a missile down and blew them to pieces, these two children. And then later on in this same program, I saw a picture of the Israelis, young men sitting at computer screens with joy sticks, and they were controlling these drones and they were looking through the eyes of the drone, if you like, and seeing people walking about, and then they could press a button on the joy stick just like a computer game.
And I had this vision of two of these guys sitting there and they saw these two beautiful young women turn round and laugh at them, you know, thought they were laughing at the drone, but who knows, they may have been laughing at some joke that they had made. You know, these guys saw them laughing at the drone and they just pressed the button and wiped them out. It is like that – this distance between people – that these modern weapons enable people to use.
Jim Fetzer: I've actually published a piece entitled, "On the Ethical Conduct of Warfare: Predator Drones", that was published by Global Research, and studies have shown that from these drone attacks they are killing on the average of 140 innocent civilians for every targeted insurgent. And of course, as we well know, since the United States is the aiding and occupying force from the point of view of the Iraqis and the Afghans, these are "freedom fighters" as Ronald Reagan described the Contras in Nicaragua. The incapacity of Americans to see another point of view, Chris, is simply staggering, I must tell you, it's just staggering.
Dr. Busby: Well I agree with you, absolutely. I kind of know that. I know that. I don't know what you can do about it.
Jim Fetzer: The fact that you've been dealing with these exotic weapons, or at least their effects, leads me to ask the following question. One of the most puzzling aspects of research on 9/11 is how the Twin Towers were destroyed because their being converted into millions of yards of very fine dust from the top down, while all the floors were remaining stationary. The mass of the lower parts of the buildings is overwhelmingly greater than the mass of the top of the building – in relation to the North Tower, for example, the top 14 floors, because the steel is tapered from the base.
Whereas in the sub-basement it is 6 inches thick, and then 5 and so forth up to a quarter inch thick at the top, represents that only 1.4 percent of the mass of the steel and the idea that that could overcome the lower 98.6 is simply a physical impossibility. And yet we have these buildings clearly being blown apart in every direction, not any effect of a unidirectional gravitational attraction downward. And the question becomes "what could possibly have brought this about?" And I just wonder if any of these extraordinary weapons you are talking about could have such effects.
Dr. Busby: Well, that is an interesting question there and it has to do with this story of tritium in the water in the basement of the Twin Towers. Now if you look at tritium in the Twin Towers, there is a proper, peer reviewed scientific paper by a number of quite eminent chemical analysts who measured the concentration of the element tritium, which is a form of radioactive hydrogen [used in nuclear weapons and produced in some nuclear reactions] in the basement waters of the Twin Towers, and they concluded that the amount of tritium there was absolutely impossible – it could not have got there except as a consequence of some "unusual happening".
Now the point about this weapon that I'm talking to you about, this weapon of deuterium and uranium, is that it does actually produce tritium. That's one of its major products. It produces helium-4 and tritium. So what you would need to look for if you were looking for, I suppose, this particular explosive's sort of footprint, you would look for tritium, and they did find tritium in the Twin Towers, so it is entirely possible that they were brought down with this same weapon.
Jim Fetzer: And it's a weapon that produces a neutron bomb effect . . .
Dr. Busby: Yes, by producing gamma rays
Jim Fetzer: . . . by combining depleted uranium with enriched uranium. And could be blended so you could create any mixture you like to achieve the type of effect, the range of blast and so forth desired.
Leuren Moret: Chris, explain to Jim and the audience what you discovered about the structure of super-thermite or thermite that was developed at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab and the similar structure in the layers, like a sandwich, of these fourth-generation nuclear weapons, and they were also developed at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab.
Dr. Busby: Well I think that you'll have to do that. I don't know anything about super-thermite. People have talked to me about it, but I don't really know anything about it.
Photo 1: This photo was taken within a few hundredths of a microsecond of the detonation of the device. It was most likely taken from an airplane, but it could have been shot from a satellite. The fireball can be seen at its brightest, and a uniquely designed pattern is also very easily seen.
Photo 2: This second photograph was taken approximately a millisecond after the first. The dome of the fireball can be seen, along with the specially created pattern of neutrons impacting the ground.
CHINESE NEUTRON BOMB TEST 1995-6: Samuel Cohen said he estimates the size of the fireball in the pictures to be about 200 to 300 feet across. He believes it is a good example of what to expect from a one-kiloton, low yield neutron bomb. The photos came without technical information, so Cohen and others who evaluated the pictures were unable to provide conclusive details. [Source: Bresnahan, D., "China Test-detonates Kiloton Neutron Bomb: U.S. likely knew about surface explosion", FREEDOM NETWORK, April 1999]
Leuren Moret: You were talking about the structure of the fourth-generation nuclear weapons where it is a layer of deuterium, a layer of U235….
Dr. Busby: No no, it's a solution of deuterium in the uranium…
Leuren Moret: Oh, in the uranium.
Dr. Busby: Yes. The fact is that we know from work that was done by a colleague of mine called Martin Fleischmann, who first discovered what is called "cold fusion" at the University of Southampton, and I was actually working with that a while ago. It was in the late 70s, beginning of the 80s. He discovered that if you dissolve deuterium and palladium and then electrolyze… use it for electrolysis, you get more energy out than you put in, and then that was called cold fusion.
And everyone was running around trying to make free energy using cold fusion. And the Harwell Laboratory, at that time, the atomic energy research laboratory in the UK denied that and said "Oh, it doesn't work". He just kind of gave up on that, or at least it didn't go anywhere. But more recently, he has told my colleague in Italy that in fact a much better electrode to use, or a much better material to use, is uranium, but in fact not palladium. But uranium dissolves much more hydrogen or deuterium because it goes into the interstices between these enormous uranium atoms because you know it has an atomic number of 92. So it's a very very big atom and in the metallic matrix, there's lots of spaces between the atoms where hydrogen can pack in, so enormous amounts of deuterium will actually just dissolve in solution into the uranium matrix.
Now if you then compress it, it causes a cold fusion reaction, according to this guy, Emilio Della Guidice, whom I met in London. He told me about this. If you then compress a supersaturated solution of deuterium in uranium, there is nowhere for the deuterium to go so it compresses to the extent that it turns itself into helium-4 and produces tritium and a great gamma ray pulse with neutrons. It's a two-stage reaction. So it is a cold fusion reaction. So in principle what you have to do is take a shell and fill it up with uranium powder and then dissolve deuterium, heavy hydrogen, in that and then fire it at something. So there is that something it squashes. It gets compressed and then you get this gigantic pulse of energy as a result of this fusion reaction – cold fusion. That is what he suggested is what this cold fusion weapon is. In fact, the Russians did talk about a similar weapon which they called "Red Mercury".
And they referred to it in the late part of Ronald Reagan's presidency, sometime when there was a discussion between Reagan and some General in the Soviet system. They were bragging about the fact that they had this weapon that was about the size of a baseball that was a neutron bomb, and it had a density such that it weighed about 20 kilograms or so many kilograms. Anyway I have worked out that in order to be the size of a baseball and weigh whatever they said it weighed, it had to be to be uranium because that was the only thing that had sufficient density to weigh that much.
So I think this weapon has been around for some time actually. So that's all I know, but I don't know anything about the super-thermite. But if a weapon exists, that's how it works.
Jim Fetzer: The research that has been done about the superthermite or nanothermite actually had shown that it does not have the explosive properties that would be required to perform these feats. I have worked in collaboration with a chemical engineer from NASA by the name of T. Mark Hightower. We have now published several articles demonstrating that the detonation velocity of nano-thermite is only 895 meters per second, whereas as you know from materials science the principle that you must have a detonation velocity equal at least to the speed of sound and the material wherein concrete is 3200 meters per second and in steel 6100 meters per second, so that nano-thermite doesn't even have the potential to have brought about the effects that were observed, for example in the Twin Towers on 9-11.
Dr. Busby: …the tritium, that's the point.
Jim Fetzer: The tritium, yes yes, elevated levels of tritium and I also understand that of barium, of strontium and of deuterium.
Dr. Busby: Well…if true…I didn't know you got deuterium as well as tritium. If you've got deuterium as well as tritium, that pretty much nails it, doesn't it?
EURASIAN AIR CIRCULATION AND DISPERSAL Movement of air masses through contaminated regions transports the radioactive poison gas and aerosols around the world, contaminating the environment through dry and wet depositions, causing large increases globally in uranium-related diseases and chronic illnesses, infertility, and the feminization of men. [Source: Peter Eyre, former British Naval Intelligence and Middle East oil and gas consultant]
Jim Fetzer: Well I would like for you to elaborate on that because this is a very important point. I have longed believed that it was the chemical residue that was going to tell us what was going on here.
Dr. Busby: Right. Well, from what I just said, from what Emilio Della Guidice told me, this weapon is deuterium dissolved in uranium. OK. Now if that's the case, you're not going to get a hundred percent fusion. I mean I'd be surprised if you got more than five percent fusion. And it could well be that you could regulate the level of fusion by regulating the gamma radioactivity of the uranium. So if you put more U235 into the mix, you might be able to increase the electron density and therefore, because of the ionization of the U235 is much more radioactive than U238, and then you might be able to regulate the percentage of the material that went to cold fusion.
But I would be extremely surprised if the percentage of fusion was very high at all. Because, if it were for me [to say], there would be all sorts of parts of this weapon that didn't reach super-saturation. So some part of it would get this fusion reaction and it would blow the rest of it away. Just like the atom bombs. That's why they had to put these big uranium casings on the atom bomb because the initial fission explosion would blow everything away and then the neutron density would fall down, so you would lose a lot of efficiency.
And even the way in which they did it with atom bombs, they still only got about five percent fission. So there was an awful lot of wastage. And the same here. So the wastage, of course, would lead to all that deuterium being released in the explosion as deuterium, not having been turned into anything else… like tritium and so forth and would be able to be there in the ground, see, and hence the deuterium.
Jim Fetzer: Let me pose the plausibility of the following scenario. We have firefighters who were reporting hearing 'boom boom boom boom'. It was 110 stories and it took approximately 11 seconds to be completely destroyed, I believe we were listening to a series of explosions that were blowing out 10 floors at a time. Would that sound plausible using these types of weapons?
Dr. Busby: I really don't know. I'm not a weapons expert. All I can say…I mean…all of this is the sort of back walk, I mean we walked away from what I know, which is that we discovered enriched uranium in Fallujah.
Jim Fetzer: Yes.
Dr. Busby: And walking back from that we then think well why is there enriched uranium in Fallujah and then we say 'well look here, one of the possibilities is that they developed this weapon.' And then you add all of the other stuff in and it means that maybe this weapon exists.
Jim Fetzer: Yes.
Dr. Busby: I have no idea how powerful it is, but I would suggest that it is very very powerful in terms of its size. So if you want something that's small that somebody can walk and just stick it in the corner somewhere that has enough power to blow this building down, you know, then it's a good bet. In other words, otherwise you'd have to take a suitcase of TNT, or maybe like, you know, suitcases that would make it more difficult…
Jim Fetzer: Oh it would be massive quantities of TNT, massive quantities… Just to mention in response to Leuren's interest in the nano-thermite, it has less than 13 percent the explosive power of TNT.
Leuren Moret: A chemical explosive does not release enough energy to do what happened to the World Trade Center buildings, which was to nano-powder them. And they were in lower orbital space within 48 hours of the disaster. Those are very very tiny particles and I am an atmospheric dust expert. I've never heard of it going up into lower orbital space that fast.
Jim Fetzer: Doesn't what Chris is describing sound very plausible conjecture, admittedly as a conjecture? But of course the crucial part of scientific reasoning is speculation, identifying hypotheses for further investigation. You know I think…
Leuren Moret: The whole key to what happened at the World Trade Center is the energy budget. How much energy was necessary to break those building materials into nano-particles? And that could not come from a chemical explosive. And secondly, the data that Dr. Thomas Cahill reported from his air monitoring of the World Trade Center for five months beginning October 5th after 9-11 was…He's the one that reported high levels of uranium, elevated levels of uranium in the dust that was released from the WTC, the highest concentration of fine particles ever measured in an air sample in the US and the highest concentration of metal ever measured in an air sample in the US. And also he reported deuterium, tritium, and like I said the elevated uranium levels.
Jim Fetzer: Go ahead Chris, yes.
Dr. Busby: Well, there you are. You have all those three ingredients, don't you? The tritium, the deuterium and the uranium – yes, that's all you need. It seems quite a plausible hypothesis. J
im Fetzer: It does indeed and I just want to clear, Chris, about the ingredients. You have the deuterium that is a solution of uranium, or depleted uranium, powder that is diluted with deuterium, and then all you have to do is project it or impose some pressure upon it to cause it to…
Dr. Busby: That's right. That's how it works.
Jim Fetzer: That's astounding! That's just simply astonishing!
Leuren Moret: And then to add to that…to add to that, New York City is still radioactive after 9-11. And when I started a depleted uranium Geiger counter movement in Hawaii in 2007, the police chief of New York City tried to get a law passed, he panicked because New Yorkers were contacting me and wanted to do a Geiger counter survey in New York City. And he tried to get a law passed in New York City that prohibited citizens from having or using Geiger counters or any air-monitoring instruments. It failed.
Jim Fetzer: What an arbitrary, capricious and tyrannical step to propose! I mean, that's just stunning, Leuren. We're talking about health hazard detection devices. They were supposed to be made illegal in New York City?
Leuren Moret: That's right. Because as long as the government agencies are measuring the radiation levels, we'll never get the truth. But once American citizens, or Japanese citizens or people in other countries start making the measurements themselves, then the cat is out of the bag. It's extremely empowering and very powerful and it really pushes the military and the government up against the wall. And so it's very important for Americans and citizens around the world to have measuring devices. Dr. Busby just went to Japan. Tell them what happened, Chris.
Dr. Busby: Oh, well, sure. I said I wasn't going to go very close to Fukushima because I was scared of dying, basically. So they said, "You can come 100 kilometers and we'll get the citizens of Fukushima to come to you", which they did. So I went to a place called Aizu Wakamatsu, and they said "Oh, the levels of radioactivity there are quite low." Now I have a portable gamma-spectrometer. It's really quite a sophisticated piece of kit, which I got from the East Germans – call it the Germans now – but basically I still think of them as the East Germans, in Dresden. A very very nice piece of equipment, which consisted of a germanium-scintillation counter, a two and a half inch sodium iodide detector and then a little mini-computer and stuff.
And we found in Aizu Wakumatsu, we found using a Geiger counter that there were levels of about 5.5 microsieverts per hour, which is about 5, 6, 7 times higher than background. And we set up this thing and made it the spectrum there and found enormous levels of cesium-137 and cesium-134, and also the signal appeared to show the presence of uranium-235. And since then, I have brought that sample back to England and had it tested in another laboratory using a high-resolution camera and what this shows is that there is a signal from U235, uranium-235. And that the ratio of U238 to U235 is quite anomalous.
Again, it's very highly enriched uranium, but it's much more highly enriched than Fallujah. As far as the signal is concerned, based on the thorium daughter isotopes, it seems that there is at least a 4 to 1 ratio of enriched U235 to U238, whereas it should be about 140 [to 1]. So there is something causing a lot of U235 and it could well be the presence of plutonium-239. Because U235 is the daughter of plutonium-239, and of course there was one of the one of the reactors at Number 3 that had MOX fuel [MOX: mixed uranium and plutonium oxide fuel] which burned and exploded and so on. So I think there is quite a lot of contamination of plutonium all over the whole area there. But of course all of this has been covered up by the Japanese authorities…
Jim Fetzer: And with complicity from the American government, it appears, and I think…
Dr. Busby: And I would say probably encouragement from the American government.
Jim Fetzer: And in part, no doubt, on behalf of the nuclear power industry because they don't want Americans to be alarmed by the massive risks they are confronting by having these power plants distributed all over the country.
Leuren Moret: Of course, of course. There is just an absolute massive global cover-up.
LIVERMORE WHISTLEBLOWER: Staff Scientist Leuren Moret exposed science fraud, graft, corruption, and contractor fraud in 1991 at the Livermore nuclear weapons lab. She has traveled to 50 countries to carry out an education campaign against nuclear technologies. [Photo: courtesy of Leuren Moret 2005]
Dr. Busby: In my country in Britain, I managed to get on to the BBC right at the beginning before they figured out what was going on and I haven't been on air since then. And there is a whole stream of people out there on television saying 'oh, really no problem' and 'very low doses and nobody will be harmed' and so forth. It's an entire cover-up operation. It's quite sickening.
Jim Fetzer: And I found the same with the BBC in covering research that I and others had done about 9-11. They were very adept when I'd be discussing one feature reported by photographic evidence. When they broadcast, they showed another photograph with different features and they did that in a pattern suggesting I hadn't known what I was talking about, when in fact I had explained to them when they were here at my home, this most recent taping for four hours, the differences that were involved here, and nevertheless, they performed a sleight-of-hand during their documentaries.
Dr. Busby: How interesting. How interesting.
Jim Fetzer: I have actually published this in a piece titled "The BBC's Instrument of 9/11 Misinformation" on Veterans Today. But Chris I've got to say how much I admire what you have been doing here. This Fallujah catastrophe is going to go down as one of the great war crimes in history, comparable to the bombing of Guernica which Picasso immortalized. It is just grief inducing to hear about the consequences, and I gather, based upon your research, it is evident that this contamination is reaching around the globe, that it has the potential to effect the entire human species genetically.
Dr. Busby: Yes, that's right. That's right. We have measured this stuff in places like in the atomic weapons establishment in the United Kingdom. And it is not surprising at all because these particles are basically gas, and they are so small, you know, 50 nanometers, a hundred nanometers, they can't really be considered to be solids. They are aerosols and they just behave as a gas, and they float all over the place. They float all around the globe and they contaminate everybody, so no man is an island in this case. Absolutely.
Jim Fetzer: It seems to me that between the catastrophes in Fallujah, in Iraq generally, in the Gulf of Mexico, and Fukushima that we are doing a pretty good job of contaminating our environment and making the planet uninhabitable at least for the long run for the human species because of genetic abnormalities which are going to lead to such a high percentage of deaths. And really it is going to stem the reproduction of the species. It seems to me it's inevitable at this point in time.
Dr. Busby: Well you say "we" but it's not you or me, James. These are actual people and they've got names and addresses, and we're talking about a split in the human race between the bad guys and the good guys. It's a bit like the Lord of the Rings. There are bad guys and they do have names and ultimately I hope that they will send them to jail for a very long time.
Jim Fetzer: But the consequences, I fear, is not merely, you know, those who are responsible, but the enduring effects, which, it seems to me, are going to prove to be insurmountable, that there's going to be no way to circumvent the consequences to the human species with respect to its capacity for reproduction based upon the genetic defects that are being induced by these calamities. It includes, of course, not just the radioactive disaster at Fukushima but also those induced by the use of Corexit in the Gulf of Mexico, and everything you have been describing in Iraq, which is horrendous by itself.
Dr. Busby: Yes, they were of course. And I can tell you one thing…that the Israelis, for example, carried out a study in Jerusalem about two years ago of sperm counts in young men. And what they found was that there was such a reduction in sperm counts [a 40% decline in sperm count/quality in last ten years] that the authors of this article, which was in a peer-reviewed journal, said that if this rate in reduction of sperm count continued at the same rate, by the time 2020, there will be no more Israelis. That will be it – finished. It will be like the Newfoundland cod.
Jim Fetzer: By the year when? How distant was their projection?
Dr. Busby: By 2020. Their project was 2020. If it continues…
Jim Fetzer: 2020 !
Dr. Busby: By 2020, that would be the end of Israel.
Jim Fetzer: 2020 — and this is already 2011!
Leuren Moret: The sperm count in the last ten years has declined 40 percent in Israeli men. It was already at least 20 percent in decline because of nuclear technology, but at this rate, by 2020, just as Dr. Busby has said, basically Israeli men will be sterilized. At 20 percent sperm count, men are considered to be sterile. [See HAARETZ: "Study: Quality of Israeli sperm down 40% in past decade" by Ofri Ilani (11.05.09)]
Jim Fetzer: Are we aware of what might be the specific causes of this reduction in sperm count among the Israeli …
Dr. Busby: It's uranium. It's the uranium. The uranium is floating all around the Middle East.
Jim Fetzer: Including, at part, perhaps their own production of weapons where they have one of the larger stock piles, the largest in the Middle East, but also a large one worldwide.
Dr. Busby: It's the uranium in the atmosphere. It's the uranium. That's what it is. Its inhaled and then it goes directly into the system…
Jim Fetzer: So we're just talking about these Israeli men as a sample of a larger population problem worldwide?
Leuren Moret: No. What happened is I have photographs during the Gaza attack of the Israeli Defense Forces [IDF] dropping 8 and 10 depleted uranium bunker busters at a time [carpet bombing with DU] along the Israeli Gaza border, which is up on the heights. There's nobody living up there. The Gaza population lives along the ocean, the Mediterranean coastline, and the Israeli Defense Forces were deliberately bombing their own border and I have airflow charts and photographs of the wind blowing from the Mediterranean, up to the heights, and blowing all that uranium dust into Israel.
Exploding depleted (DU) uranium bomb, with 4 incoming DU bombs just above the fireball, on the heights above Gaza at the Israeli-Gaza border. The Gaza shoreline and Mediterranean Sea are in the back-ground. The onshore winds on this day in early 2009, carried the radioactive dust and smoke over the Israeli border in minutes, exposing the Israeli population to high levels of radiation in the air, and permanent contamination of the Israeli environment – air, water, soil, and food. [Source: "UN 2008 Report: Evidence of Global Decline In Population and Fertility", presented by Leuren Moret, at Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Confer. Sept. 20, 2009]
Jim Fetzer: Wow. And I presume a comparable reduction in sperm count is taking place in the Palestinian population.
Leuren Moret: Actually their population is expanding. The Israeli population is shrinking.
Jim Fetzer: That's stunning, isn't it? Stunning!
Leuren Moret: Well, they have a lot more children than the Israelis.
Jim Fetzer: Yes, but if the sperm count was being affected on both sides, it wouldn't be happening this way either.
Dr. Busby: The Palestinians have a lot more babies, that's all, same percentage…doesn't matter same effect.
Jim Fetzer: Oh, so you are suggesting they could have the lower sperm count but because of reproducing, having more children than the Israelis, which of course is a well known socioeconomic phenomenon…
Leuren Moret: Right!
Jim Fetzer: …that the higher educated, the higher socioeconomic…
Dr. Busby: Have you noticed in the West, well I don't know about America, but I certainly know in this country that it is getting more and more difficult to have babies. I mean there is all of this technology going into IVF (in vitro fertilization) now and so forth. You know when I was young, you know, you only had to shake hands with a woman and she would be pregnant.
Jim Fetzer: (laughs)
Dr. Busby: I mean, I can tell you…
Jim Fetzer: I got it, Chris, yes. That's great.
Dr. Busby: But nowadays its not like that. You have to get fancy doctors and have all sorts of treatments.
Jim Fetzer: Don't you imagine it is also a function of the increased use of electronic equipment and wireless transmissions and cell phones?
Dr. Busby: Yes, I think I know about that too. If you want to start me on that one, I think we figured that one out.
Jim Fetzer: Yes, give us a few words about that before we have to part because this has been simply superb.
Dr. Busby: OK. This is how it works. All of the effects of ionizing radiation are transmitted in the body in the form of charged particle tracks and most of these are electrons. So what happens is a gamma ray is absorbed by material in the body water, in the cell, and it generates a photoelectron. So the electron is wheeling off. And it is the photoelectron that causes all of the ionization that leads to the genetic damage. So it is charged particle tracks that cause cancer. Now if you put a charged particle track in the body electric into an electric field, then the energy of the electron or the particle is absolutely added to by the electric field.
And this is how television works. You shoot an electron down a cathode ray tube and you perturb its motion by putting it an electric field or a magnetic field, so you put any body contaminated with radiation into an electro-magnetic field, the energy is transferred to the body and it is transferred to the charged particles, to the electron. So obviously what you are doing is merely increasing the impact, if you like, the momentum, of the ionizing radiation…
Leuren Moret: The energy release. Yes.
Dr. Busby: And so that…what you are doing is augmenting the ionizing radiation dose.
Jim Fetzer: Say the last part…you're ionizing the radiation…?
Dr. Busby: You're augmenting the radiation, you're increasing the ionizing radiation dose. So the ionizing radiation that you would normally get in the absence of a mobile phone, so you haven't got a mobile phone, you're sitting in a room with all the electrons whirling around causing genetic damage, and that's called background radiation. So then you pick up your mobile phone, you switch it on and say "Hello mum it's me' all right, and what happens then is quite a few milliwatts per cubic centimeter then go into your brain, and all of that energy is electromagnetic energy. Now as far as the electron tracks are concerned, they see no difference between that and an electric field or a magnetic field. So instead of whizzing along in a straight line, [an electric field causes the electrons to] wiggle about. So they're increasing the amount of energy they deposit in the tissue over the amount that they normally would in the absence of the mobile phone radiation.
Well, this is really quite remarkable. We tried to do research on this at the Karolinska Institute [where the Nobel prizes are awarded in Norway]. We put in an application for funding and they freaked out and they shut down my main laboratory. They got so upset about this that my colleague, Olav Johansen, who is like a world authority on this – he and I were going to do research on this and show that it is true, using all sorts of techniques, you know, Monte Carlo modeling and cloud chambers and all sorts of…
Jim Fetzer: So the greatest risk from cell phone usage may not be a form of brain cancer but rather some kind of genetic damage?
Dr. Busby: No, no, it is a form of brain cancer. That's how cancer forms. Cancer forms because of genetic damage. You get cancer from genetic damage, so all I'm saying is that the genetic damage that you normally get from ionizing radiation increases because the ionizing radiation borrows [absorbs] energy from the electromagnetic field. That's it. The point is what they say is that it is not possible for the electromagnetic field on its own to interact with genetic material because the quantum energy is not high enough. But that is not the point…what I say is that it is not about the quantum energy being ionized, it adds its energy to the electron [from internal exposure to ionizing radiation]…
Jim Fetzer: It's additive. Yes yes yes, so it does that much more damage between what the body is used to and not used to, the threshold is transcended and therefore it brings about…
Dr. Busby: No, normally you get cancer because of radiation. In other words, in a year you get two millisieverts, and then over the years the millisieverts add up and when you're 70, you get cancer. OK So, you multiply that by say 140 millisieverts and your body starts to fall apart. But if you sit there with an electromagnetic field, with a mobile phone, that just doubles it, so instead of two millisieverts in a year, you're now getting four millisieverts in a year.
Jim Fetzer: Yes Yes. and all the concomitant effects that will bring about…
Dr. Busby: Well it just doubles your rate of cancer and it doubles your rate of aging.
Leuren Moret: It's a multiplier effect.
Jim Fetzer: It's a multiplier effect, not merely additive.
Dr. Busby: Yes, correct, it is a multiplier effect.
Jim Fetzer: Christopher Busby, I cannot tell you how much I admire what you have been doing and the value of your contributions is immeasurable. This has been a most important conversation, and I am so grateful you could join me. Leuren, of course, I have long admired your many contributions and I am so grateful to have the both of you here together today. So I want to profess my profound appreciation to you, Leuren Moret, and to you, Christopher Busby for the exceptional quality of your work and your contributions to humanity. I admire you both.
Leuren Moret: Well we appreciate you.
Dr. Busby: You're welcome.
Jim Fetzer: So this is Jim Fetzer, your host on "The Real Deal" thanking my specials guests today, Christopher Busby from the UK, Leuren Moret from California, and all of you for listening. J
im Fetzer, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, is a former Marine Corps officer and the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
Leuren Moret is an independent geoscientist who has done expert studies on the Fukushima disaster, radiation problems around the world including depleted uranium.
Dr. Christopher Busby is a visiting biomedical studies professor at the University of Ulster and is the co-author of reports about the effects of enriched uranium in Iraq especially in Fallujah.
Jim Fetzer
McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.
The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Latest posts by Jim Fetzer (see all)
- Boston Show Trial: The Opinion of an Attorney at Law - March 24, 2015
- JFK: HARVEY & LEE — Peering into a black hole - March 20, 2015
- JFK: The HARVEY & LEE Illusion (Updated!) - March 19, 2015
Related Posts:
Posted by Jim Fetzer on November 3, 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments Closed
31 Responses to "New Bombs and War Crimes in Fallujah"
Excellent contribution to the comment section Jim, thank you for putting this information out for the readers.
Hi Jim,
I did some research a few years back:
This is more coverage of Basra, and also Afghanistan. Human cost, in terms of cancer, leukemia, birth defects is incalculably worse than what American endured in the 9/11 attacks.
Douglas Westerman firstname.lastname@example.com
Dirty Little Secrets – the hidden, awkward origins of World War 2 – the unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events
Just consider the following:
· Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying "Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war". (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
· Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says "Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for." (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
· Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany 'understandable'. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred." (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
· Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin 'said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself' (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).
Etc etc etc etc – more detail at http://www.rense.com/general92/dirty.htm
It's Oliver Cromwell's fault. The Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews, because they were such efficient 'troublemakers', were expelled from most countries in Europe by 11-1200 AD. Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews wanting to return to England hired Oliver Cromwell to get them back into the British Isles. After wrecking England from top to bottom with a hired rabble rousing army made up of many French mercenaries, Oliver Cromwell passed a law permitting the (Khazar/Ashkenaz) Jews to return to England in the 1500's. The best historic coverage of the alien (Khazar/Ashkenaz) Jews and their many revolutions over the past 1000 years in countries they were not even citizens in (hence they are referred to as "aliens"), was written before WW II and published by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay educated at Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and a member of the British Parliament who wrote it to try to stop WW II. It confirms what Mr. Ambleton presents in the quotes from key players in WW II. His book (a free pdf online) is called "THE NAMELESS WAR" and can be read or downloaded here:
"Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at Eton and the Royal Military
College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First
World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 – thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and
the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.
From 1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard. In 1931 he was elected
a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.
Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without
charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. On the
following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there
until the end of that Parliament in 1945."
The alien Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews caused the French Revolution, Russian Revolution (nearly half of the Bolshevik leadership were American Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews from Brooklyn and the Bronx funded by Jacob Schiff (=Rothschild) CEO of Kuhn-Loeb), the Spanish Revolution, and now they are taking over the United States with more Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews in Congress now than in the Knesset in Israel: Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, etc etc etc. Even at Yale, 35% of the students are Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews, many Israelis who use student loans to get through college, then return to Israel and have a friend or contact with key access to govt. loan records simply delete their unpaid loans from the database. 85% of key US govt. positions are held by Yale graduates…
The Jews people are referring to as the 'troublemakers' or "Jews who are not Jews" are Talmudic Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews who were from Central Asia and were originally from Turkic tribes in the larger collection of the Kazakh tribes. They must be distinguished from right minded Jews who practice their religion without the satanic influence of the Talmud, and who are good citizens and contribute to the community and country they live in. The fraud of the false flag state of Israel, is that the Khazar/Ashkenaz Talmudic Jews who established and are now running it, are Turks not Semites. That is why many Near Eastern scholars and archaeologists are Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews who have been writing a false history supporting the Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews claims that their homeland was in the Middle East. Nyet nyet nyet… far from it.
Chris Busby – Enriched uranium weapon new battlefield horror (25-Oct-11)(NWO GLOBAL WARS series)
Here's the link to Captain May's article on the Battle for Baghdad Airport and the Neutron bomb:
A very sobering article indeed.
Another VT Columnist Captain May reported the use of a neutron bomb during the battle for Baghdad Airport in 2003 and how it was covered up. This was published in the Texas Iconoclast a few years ago. I'm sure a quick search will turn it up.
Another use of a tactical nuclear device can be clearly seen at 3:57 in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xguP_XZRaBQ This was the destruction of the Forward Falcon Base, about which there has been no satisfactory explanation from the Pentagon. The hallmark nuclear flash is unmistakable.
The bottom line is that the earth's population is going to be reduced to 500 million – or that's the plan. Check out the Georgia Guidestones – and the pronouncements of various academics. Why else would Bill Gates et al. have built a seed repository off the Noweigian coast? http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23503 They know something we don't – although it's becoming increasingly easy to figure out. They plan to get us by sterilization, GMO orchestrated starvation, or outright killing. The plethora of "Future Dystopia" style movies and video games over the last 30-40 years is no coincidence. We are being prepared. Welcome to the Future.
This really is a MUST READ. Great work Jim. Thank you
I had to walk away from this article and transcript multiple times to digest it in edible portions. If this is what we are capable of, as well as our "enemies/friends", WE ARE SCREWED! The "point-of-no-return" isn't even in the rearview mirror anymore. I've said it before, when does the next flight for MARS leave and are there any seats left.
Absolutely fascinating interview. It brings to mind a troubling question: Were it a nuclear device of the sort described that destroyed WTC 1&2, what would have been the reason for sequestering and then exporting the (barely cooled) steel to mills in China and Korea? And further, is there any truth to the stories that Chinese authorities have saved some of the steel with the telltale evidence contained therein for purposes of blackmail?
Thank you. These explain so much.
Thank you for this outstanding shedding of light in this very dark world. We must speak these truths far and wide. And I personally intend to couple this light of truth with fervent prayer to the God of the universe to stop the plans for an attack on Iran that I understand is imminent. Others please join me.
For our struggle is not with flesh and blood but with the principalities, with the powers, with the world rulers of this present darkness, with the evil spirits in the heavens.
Footage 9min in
DVD8 M Falluja The hidden massacre
"if this rate in reduction of sperm count continued at the same rate, by the time 2020, there will be no more Israelis. That will be it – finished. It will be like the Newfoundland cod.
Jim Fetzer: By the year when? How distant was their projection?
Dr. Busby: By 2020. Their project was 2020. If it continues…
Jim Fetzer: 2020 !
Dr. Busby: By 2020, that would be the end of Israel.
Jim Fetzer: 2020 — and this is already 2011!"
Great news!
Global sperm rates had declined by 20% in terms of sperm count, motility, and DNA damage by the 1990's – due primarily to the introduction of nuclear technologies. From 1999-2009, sperm quality declined another 40% in Israel (DU used in Iraq, Afghan, Yugoslavia and even more serious – Israel carpet bombing its own borders with DU), leaving just 40% of sperm normal in Israeli men by 2009. At 20% sperm count and quality, a man is considered sterile. With the intense use of DU and other weapons in Gaza, that interact synergistically with radioactive materials and multiply their harmful effects by many times, an even steeper sharp drop of sperm quality in Israeli men can be expected in less than 5 years leaving the majority of Israeli men sterile. The Israeli population already has a low rate of reproduction causing a shrinking population, which will decline even more in the near future in men AND women. In sharp contrast however, the Palestinian population is increasing the number of Palestinians in the area because they like very large families.
All Palestinians have to do now is WAIT…
Samuel Cohen died nearly one year ago. He left a horrific legacy… extermination was his passion (a characteristic of psychopaths). I am certain that Edward Teller – Dr. Strangelove – was one of his big supporters because Edward Teller was also a "nuclearizer" as Sakharov used to call them, and very influential with President Reagen, who never read anything but READER'S DIGEST, which contained little information about the hazards of nuclear technologies or any other reality. The fact that is very clear now is that the civilian population has been the real target of wars for the past 100+ years… and even more clear recently with the obvious extermination of whole regions of people – Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Japan… And nuclear technologies are the perfect weapon – invisible, tasteless, and not detectable by anything but sophisticated instruments and scientists who hide the truth. So we must come together as a global community to resolve this tragedy, and the greatest threat to all living things. It's up to us… but I think we are up to the challenge. In the toughest of times… the tough get going. It's up to us, and we cannot fail. There is really nothing to be afraid of but the paralysis of fear, and that is soon overcome as more and more people speak out. It's the right information that has the power… so spread the word.
Just when it seems that VT has reached the top of the curve in quality of investigative reporting, more superb articles like this one and the recent one by Bob Nichols appear which take it to an even higher level of quality and comprehensiveness. No other current affairs publication comes even close to the depth and quality of the investigative reports on VT and the Editors deserve commendations for getting the truth about these difficult subjects out there to the public. Busby and Moret are credible scientists, true heavy weights that just happen to care a great deal about humanity and are doing all that they can to get the truth out about the abuse of nuclear materials via lack of proper containment in nuclear power generating plants and abuse via military deployment. And once again Jim Fetzer has written a stunning article that brings it home in full impact. This story appears to have serious legs. Has the nuclear genie been let out of the bottle again since Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Has pandora's box been opened too with all the anonymous death by remote control video with the drone attacks? Have those claiming to be fighting international terrorism become high tech terrorists and will there deployment of these high tech weapons set off a new international arms race and reactionary counter deployment?
Is Samuel T. Cohen still alive? He should never be allowed to enjoy another meal, see another flower, enjoy the touch of another human hand. If there was such a thing as a man of honor in this world, it would be so.
Psychopathic monster, this Cohen. Another 'great' Jewish contribution to the world.
Thank you Drs Moret, Bubsy and Fetzer for bringing the crude and unpleasant facts about the high technology war crimes committed against the Iraqi people, the Palestinians and, for drawing the attention on the possibly that the same devastating technology was used on US soil, during the 9/11 False Flag.
Iraq and the Iraqi people were used as practicing targets of a new brand of weapons, the same as the Zion Talmudic Army of Occupation did against Gaza and its defenseless women and children each time, they wanted to test new lethal amo, new methods of repression or just for fun whenever the Mafia Dons felt bored and/or needed to exercise for a coming aggression on their agenda in Lebanon.
Perhaps, the most devastating effect of USA's association with the Rogue State of Israel is the adoption by the US decision makers of the same Rogue Mindset as the Israeli psychos. I saw it coming when the repression in the West Bank got more and more vicious-murderous and, the USA, instead of condemning the meaningless violence against civilians, was sending more weapons to the perpetrators and Israel was sharing field reports with the CIA-Pentagon about the results of the devastation.
That's what you get when a juvenile criminal is put in the same cell as a more mentally deranged serial killer. Israel was the pioneer in violating, as it pleases and whenever it pleases, the Geneva Convention regarding war conduction. America picked up from there and wanted to show that it is better at it, can't be beaten by no one and do not need the Talmud to be a serial and compulsive liar, whenever it feels necessary.
With the utter radiation contamination 'self imposed' on Israel re the diminishing sperm counts coupled with the wind patterns from the uranium weapons dropped EAST of Gaza, it would seem that the Israeli's know that they are limited with time of existence and may very well lash out in one final blow against their perceived 'enemies' and preemptively strike (Iran) before 2020 to go out in a blaze of glory, the second coming……and that is what religious fanaticism will produce.
Re 911, the fact that Tritium and Deuterium were found in the basements of the WTC need to be reassessed re Dr. Busby's remarks above.
just a thought, and I never believed it either, but we were there for "WMDs", specifically centrifuge equipment… Could it have been hidden there?
"Could it have been hidden there?"
Listen very closely, you product of mass media LIES:
You don't need centrifuge equipment.
JANUARY 2009 ATTACK ON GAZA with DU Weapons…
The intelligence of a true psychopath, one who exposes their own!
You must be logged in to post a comment Login


text:
Single nucleotide polymorphism of the MxA gene promoter influences the response to interferon monotherapy in patients with hepatitis C viral infection
Article first published online: 29 APR 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2004.00509.x
Journal of Viral Hepatitis
Volume 11, Issue 3, pages 271–276, May 2004
Additional Information
How to Cite
Suzuki, F., Arase, Y., Suzuki, Y., Tsubota, A., Akuta, N., Hosaka, T., Someya, T., Kobayashi, M., Saitoh, S., Ikeda, K., Kobayashi, M., Matsuda, M., Takagi, K., Satoh, J. and Kumada, H. (2004), Single nucleotide polymorphism of the MxA gene promoter influences the response to interferon monotherapy in patients with hepatitis C viral infection. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 11: 271–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2004.00509.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 29 APR 2004
- Article first published online: 29 APR 2004
- Received in revised form August 2003; accepted for publication September 2003
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Options for accessing this content:
- If you have access to this content through a society membership, please first log in to your society website.
- If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
Login via OpenAthens
Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!
Patient Access
Patients and/or caregivers may access this content for use in relation to their own personal healthcare or that of a family member only. Terms and conditions will apply.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Coming up in the next {{countdown}} {{countdownlbl}}
Coming up next:
Skip to this video now
Now Playing:
Related Videos
Now Playing: {{itm.title}}
Play Video
This transcript has been automatically generated and may not be 100% accurate.
Shonda Rhimes Is Making DC Sexy On 'Scandal'
'Scandal' Cast Spills Finale Secrets, Offer Sneak Peek
Kerry Washington, Tony Goldwyn and Katie Lowes join cast-mates in chat about hit ABC series.
Now Playing: 'Scandal' Cast Spills Finale Secrets, Offer Sneak Peek
Now Playing: 'Scandal' Cast Reveal Reaction to 'Shocking' Finale
Now Playing: Astronaut Scott Kelly Blasts Off for #YearinSpace
Now Playing: 'Wolfpack' App Helps Men Find Bro-Friends
Now Playing: Germanwings Co-Pilot Allegedly Hid Illness from Airline
Now Playing: McDonald's McFashion: Introducing Big Mac Clothing Line
Now Playing: Egg Freezing Parties Turn Doctor Visits into Celebrations
Now Playing: Germanwings Plane Crash's Terrifying Final Moments
Now Playing: One Direction's Zayn Malik Quits Biggest Boy Band on Earth
Now Playing: Celine Dion on Emotional Struggle with Husband's Cancer Battle
Now Playing: Shocking Videos Show Teen Drivers Moments Before a Crash
Now Playing: Germanwings Pilot Locked Out of Cockpit Before Crash, Report Says
Now Playing: 'The X-Files' Returns, Mulder and Scully Are Back
Now Playing: Inside Angelina Jolie's Life-Changing Decision to Remove Ovaries
Now Playing: Germanwings Crash Investigators Piece Together What Happened
Now Playing: How 'Pretty Woman' Would Be Different Today
Now Playing: Turning Junk From Your Garage into Cash
Now Playing: The Pain of Cyberbullying Still Lingers Years Later
Now Playing: Al Pacino on 'Danny Collins' Role, What Keeps Him Going
Now Playing: Inside Apple's Top Secret Health Lab for Apple Watch
Now Playing: How This NYC Socialite Hacks the Travel Industry


text:
Highlight: Ed Ruscha
Spotlight: Wright
Featured: Stephen Bulger Gallery
Now On: Herbert List
Top Lot: Anish Kapoor
View Catalogue: Donald Lipski
Over 9 MillionAuction Results
Featured Member:Cavalier Galleries
Upcoming Auction atPhillips New York
Sample Report
The Marquesas Islands, which can be visited today by cruise line, cargo ship and air, consists of six main islands and many smaller ones. They lie in the middle of the southern Pacific Ocean, about 800 miles northeast of Tahiti. Remembered as the final home of Paul Gauguin, the Marquesas only became generally known in the West with the publication of Herman Melvilles first novel, Typee, in 1846.


text: The holes in matzo give the cracker its characteristic crunch, Odelia Cohen/iStockphoto hide caption itoggle caption Odelia Cohen/iStockphoto The Salt A Love Letter To Matzo: Why The Holey Cracker Is A Crunch Above April 13, 2014 Plain, dry matzo tends to have a reputation for tastelessness. But Dan Pashman, host of the food podcast and blog The Sporkful, argues that the crunchy cracker is a culinary marvel. Listen Loading… 4:16 Download Playlist


text:
Seth McFarlane's Oscar Trifecta: Sexism, Racism, and Tastelessness, Oh My!
NWLC's water-cooler talk this morning was completely dominated by one thing: the Oscars. Program Assistants Amy Tannenbaum and Becka Wall were particularly fired up by a few things – namely, the sexism, racism, and general objectification of women that was prevalent throughout and decided to hash it out via blog post, below:
Amy: Watching the Oscars last night was such a roller coaster. There were some great moments – but overall I felt like women lost, in more ways than one.
Becka: Agreed. First of all, with the exception of Best Supporting and Best Actress, there was a serious dearth of women nominated – a notable snub was that of Kathryn Bigelow for Zero Dark Thirty, an intense movie that captured not only the 12-year manhunt for Osama Bin Laden, but also the depth of human emotion that came with it.
Amy: Can we talk about the boob song, with Seth MacFarlane highlighting the times that actresses have appeared topless in film? It was like sexual harassment in front of an audience of millions. Charlize Theron and Naomi Watts looked disgusted and uncomfortable. Women in Hollywood are already judged too heavily on their looks. This song further moved emphasis away from what the Oscars is supposed to be about – celebrating talent and film – and turned it into a kind of sexual harassment. Plus, it wasn't even funny!
Becka: I mean, let's just take a look at the lyrics to "We Saw Your Boobs":
"We saw your boobs in the movie – that's what we saw we saw your boobs. Meryl Streep, we saw them in "Silkwood" and Naomi Watts in "Mulholland Drive" and Angelina, we saw them in "Gia." Anne Hathaway, we saw them in "Brokeback Mountain." And Halle Berry in "Monster's Ball." Nicole Kidman in "Eyes Wide Shut" and Marisa Tomei but not Jennifer Lawrence's at all. We saw your boobs. We saw your boobs. Kristen Stewart, we saw them "On the Road" and we saw Charlize Theron's. Helen Hunt we saw them in "The Sessions." Scarlett Johansson we saw them on our phones. Jessica Chastain, we saw your boobs in "Lawless." Hilary Swank and Kate Winslet in "Heavenly Creatures" and "Hamlet" and "Titanic" and whatever you're in right now we saw your boobs. Ladies and gentlemen, the Gay Men's Chorus of Los Angeles. [enter Gay Men's Chorus] We saw your boobs we saw your boobs, boobs. We saw your boobs, we saw your boobs."
And, of course, then MacFarlane just had to emphasize to William Shatner that he was not part of the Gay Male Chorus – god forbid!
This could have been an interesting commentary about the fact that we're more likely to see female nudity than male nudity because it's deemed more acceptable by Hollywood, but instead it turned into an offensive laundry list of the number of times Seth MacFarlane was able to chortle to himself and say "Heh, boobies" about some of the most respected artists of our time.
And that was just the beginning of Seth's put down of women. About Ben Affleck/Kim Kardashian:
"This man has gone from starring in "Gigli" to becoming one of the most respected filmmakers of this generation. I feel like we're six months away from having to call him le Benjamin Affleck. I thought we'd cut this joke but really, want to do it? First time I saw him with all that dark facial hair I thought, my god, the Kardashians have finally made the jump to film."
And he also made a crack about Adele's weight, saying that critic Rex Reed (the same charmer who called Melissa McCarthy a 'female hippo') would critique Adele's performance of Skyfall, and – perhaps worst of all – he joked about women who conveniently "got the flu" (read: made themselves throw up) to make themselves fit into their gowns. Instead of focusing on actresses' talent on the evening meant to showcase the greatest talents in the film industry, he focused on their appearance and completely ignored their talents.
Amy: What got my blood boiling the most was the ongoing commentary about Quvenzhané Wallis, who is definitely my favorite nine-year-old on the planet. Which is why it was totally gross and unacceptable to even joke about her dating George Clooney – she is nine! The Onion's tweet calling her the c-word was the low point of the night for me. The Onion has since apologized, but it shouldn't have happened in the first place. I can't help but think it has to do with her race as well – I don't recall Dakota Fanning or Abigail Breslin being sexualized and degraded in the same way. These jokes, combined with the reference to an orgy at Jack Nicholson's house – the location of the Roman Polanski child-rape incident – really ruined the evening.
Becka: And so many reporters behaved in a flat-out rude way to Quvenzhané! One couldn't be bothered to learn how to pronounce her name, so he said he was going to call her "Annie" since she's slated to play Annie in a new movie version.
Amy: Right – and at least one Academy voter stated that he refused to vote for her because he couldn't pronounce her name. It's really not that hard, people – and you better learn how to say it now, because she'll be here for a long time.
Becka: Let's also take a second to mention the EXTREMELY offensive joke about domestic violence. MacFarlane said about Django Unchained, "Django is a movie where a woman is subjected to violence, or as we call it, a Chris Brown and Rihanna date movie." Domestic violence is not a joke, and I seriously wish people would stop treating it like it was. One in four women has experienced domestic violence, and women account for 85% of victims of intimate partner violence. It's one reason why Congress should reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act – to ensure the continuation of the Office on Violence Against Women and protect victims of domestic violence, dating violence, and sexual assault.
Amy: Eventually, though, I think we all just had to admit that Seth MacFarlane was not being funny OR interesting. There was simply no reason to joke about the lead character in Zero Dark Thirty being proof that women are headaches. It seemed especially crass in light of Bigelow's lack of recognition from the academy.
Becka: Precisely. Like most of his jokes, it fell flat. Even MacFarlane could tell that the show felt unnecessarily long and started to appear small and sweaty by the end of the ceremony. I'm just so relieved that he didn't feel the need to introduce Meryl Streep.
Amy: And what was with his bizarre comment about Latino actors' understandability? I would love to hear Seth MacFarlane attempt Spanish (actually, no I wouldn't). Salma Hayek, Penelope Cruz, and Javier Bardem are all fluent in English, so saying that he couldn't understand them says more about him than anything.
Becka: Honestly, between his cracks about Latinos, blatant dehumanization of Quvenzahné, anti-Semitic jokes, and completely missing-the-mark cracks about slavery and race, I think it's safe to say that at the very least, MacFarlane is pretty ignorant about where the line is with race and ethnicity—or he didn't care that he crossed over it.
Amy: Even so, I was glad to hear Anne Hathaway's comment about making stories like Fantine's a thing of the past. And Quvenzhané is going to rock it in the new interpretation of Annie.
Becka: Agreed! And I'm glad Inocente, the documentary short about a homeless, undocumented immigrant teenage girl in San Diego who dreams of becoming an artist won best Documentary Short. Of course, I wish they hadn't cut her mic off in the middle of the acceptance speech.
I'm all for trying to push buttons and boundaries, but there's a way to do that without offending everyone. Seth MacFarlane just completely missed the mark.
This is an excellent post I seen thanks to share it. It is really what I wanted to see hope in future you will continue for sharing such a excellent post.https://crystalrows.com
Sacramento Divorce Attorney
Parting ways in a divorce is never easy. Family members are always hurt, especially children. And to worsen matters, property division between spouses can become a complicated matter that strains family ties even more. Sacramento Divorce Attorney
automatic transmission replacement
Excellent post I seen thanks to share it. It is really what I wanted to see hope in future you will continue for sharing such a excellent post. automatic transmission replacement
I am always searching online for articles that can help me. There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also. Keep working, great job!
Pusat Penjualan Obat Herbal
Pusat Penjualan Obat Herbal Sakit Lemah Jantung amazon Plua Jus Manggis obat jantung lemah
Penjualan amazon Plus Obat Herbal Alami Penyakit Jantung Bocor obat jantung bocor
Pembahasan Mengenai Sakit Vertigo dan Cara Pemulihan alamiah obat vertigo
capture his heart using this 3 step method
Capture His Heart And Make Him Love You Forever Ebook: How To Make Your Man Fall Deeply And Passionately In Love So He Never Wants To Leavecapture his heart using this 3 step method
continue to next page on theofficialwebsite
Purchasing the program directly from Dr. David through the official website ensures the lowest price and qualifies you for a full 365-day money back guarantee. continue to next page on theofficialwebsite
Great post, good work. It Couldn't be wrote any better. Reading this post reminds me of my recent employer! He constantly kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him.http://textyourexbackforum.com/michael-fiore-text-your-ex-back-review-pdf-ebook-download/
What the fuck? is up with you slave traders?!
I am a 28 yr old mixed race british male sociopath & I would like to side not 'with' grant but 'against' sue & (name)susan. I have finally got around to googling these lyrics (28/1/2014) & saying it is sexual harrassment is bullshit & typical slave-trader over-reactiom to what is simply science fact. It is a fact that we (14-28yr old males & some lesbians) will have seen the named actresses chests. It is also a fact that chris brown is a twat. However rhianna like so many women forgave him, that is her mistake! Women if you want respect then answer me this I am fat & ugly but I would never hurt you, whereas white prettyboy is cute & rich but violent, so who gets the girl? 2 guesses & 1st doesn't count! also women who say "he only hits me coz he loves me" exist so I will only respect you when you cure them of their silliness, and all these sentiments from a retard, as usual protestant black tiger lord cyberius 1, rest of the world 0!!!! :) XD
Rhianna & Chris Brown
Of course domestic violence is a problem, and if people stop making fun of Chris about it, it will be forgotten. Every time someone cracks a joke, he is getting what he deserves, and young women everywhere are made aware of it. Would you rather it not be talked about and forgotten? He NEEDS to be made fun of, unless you want domestic violence to be an acceptable occurrence.
sexist my ass
Explain to me something, how come an actress show her boobs and singing that is sexist? dont be stupid, they show their boobs because they know men like it, there is no other reason, period.
So if a guy decides to show his penis is because it is proud of it, and won't be ashamed ...
A different POV
I can respect the interpretations about McFarlane's jokes, and the rationale. I do wonder, though, if there is room for other interpretations. For example, I saw the joke about Quevenzahne and Clooney to be a dig at Clooney's penchant for dating young women. It's unfortunate that she was the "vehicle" for the joke, but she was not the subject or butt of the joke, Clooney was.
As for much of the rest of the evening, it seems to me that irony is completely lost on many of the commentators. In general, society is becoming so protective and vigilant with respect to the sensitivities and issues that it is missing the forest for the trees. Did anyone stop to think, for example, that the boobs song was McFarlane's way of commenting on the fact that audiences (esp. male audiences) DO miss the talent of the women in question and think only about the cheap thrill (i.e. calling it as he sees it). Just like "All In The Family", we can debate forever whether social commentary pierces or perpetuates stereotypes and power relationships. I think, though, that simply calling it offensive without considering the subtext or other POVs is not a fair analysis.
Don't Go Topless
95% of topless scenes are just to titilate men. Women need to start saying "no" to topless roles.
I personally thought the song was hi-larious.
Seth Macfarlane Host
It wasn't "like" watching sexual harassment. It WAS sexual
harassment. Witnessed by millions.
I'm offended too!
"I'm all for trying to push buttons and boundaries, but there's a way to do that without offending everyone." Well, thankfully, not everyone was apparently offended -- just bloggers trying to reap page-hits. As Stephen Fry once said, ladies: "It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so f*cking what."
You're such an ignorant fool
Dude you're such an ignorant fool. Bet you wouldn't talk like this if women would be the ones making fun and degrading men. Men need a taste of their own medicine to see how it's like to always be the subject of ridicule.
Seth the Creep
Thank you for being a thinking Man
Sexual Harassment
Seth MacFarlane's hosting was textbook sexual harassment. These women had a business stake in the outcome of that night and were therefore held hostage to play along with their humiliation to be accepted in the workplace. This was all done during an international broadcast, while others laughed and cheered. Had they not had so much at stake they should / would have walked out. But that's how sexual harassment works. You are held hostage by your harasser. Maybe next year women can just go to a business gathering without being humiliated. Maybe.
"Held hostage to play along
"Held hostage to play along with their humiliation?" I'd like you to show me the part where they were being forced, at gunpoint, to experience this event. Go ahead, I'll wait.
Seth the Creep
You are Stupid
Hostage taking
Economically -and their reputation. The Oscars is
Basically a televised business convention. You can
Bet your career will suffer if you protest and don't play along.
Hats off to Seth
The best Oscars I've ever seen, and we owe it to Seth. If you aren't offending someone, then it's not funny. I'm glad they gave him the spotlight so that he could shine in all his glory, and show people that we can make fun of anything and learn to laugh at ourselves. His humor was spot on and just what Hollywood needed!
We saw your boobs was funny!!
As an audience, I never thought we saw your boobs was sexist. It was fun and it was right. All these actress did really show thier breasts and everyone already know it. It was funny just to recognize that in one song. It was NOT OFFENSIVE.
"Charlize Theron and Naomi
"Charlize Theron and Naomi Watts looked disgusted and uncomfortable." That song was prerecorded, not done live. Naomi Watts and Charlize Theron obviously were recorded before hand doing these actions, meaning that they were probably not embarrassed or uncomfortable at all. Just my input, though I will say I found the Oscars funny.
totally agree
besides she decided to show them, she must be proud
I meant too...
Otherwise, your points about McFarlane's misdeeds were right on. Even Ricky Gervais, for all the kerfuffle regarding his GG hosting, knew better than to joke about domestic abuse, etc. Had no one watched Family Guy? Mc's performance and mentality should've been no surprise.
Women get it wrong to...
Not to dispute the overall point of underrepresentation but as far as films like Zero Dark Thirty go, the consensus on its accuracy is that it was piss poor and its message of torture works can only do more untold damage. Lincoln and Argo also were very loose with the facts and veracity but Zero is dangerously misleading.
Family Guy
Have you ever reviewed Family Guy? I find it impossible to watch for more than 45 seconds because it is so relentlessly dehumanizing. When I heard they picked McFarlane to run the Oscars, I thought, why? Now everyone seems surprised that he was rude and offensive and juvenile. Have they ver seen the show?
Post new comment
Articles by Topic
Join the Reproductive Health Campaign
Go to ThisIsPersonal.org to get the facts and tools you need to help protect women's reproductive health.


text:
Web of Trust For Scientific Publications 125
from the chickenscratch-my-back-I'll-chickenscratch-yours dept.
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Coming this fall. Jean Claude Van Damme in...Web of Trust.
Two certificates enter, one leaves.
But what about the new tool? Does Google have the favor?
Rated R for violence and sexual situations.
Now, postdocs, that's another story.
Great place to start looking for information though.
[citation needed]
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all." -- Nathaniel Branden


text:
View Singles in Bodega
By clicking continue, I agree to receive transactional and promotional emails from Match.com. I understand that I am free to withdraw consent at any time.
By using our site, you agree to the Match.com Terms of Use.
21 - Bodega, CA
Active over 3 weeks ago
The Golden State of California is place to find online singles from Match.com. Search Match.com for California singles today. With nearly 26 million members, someone's sure to catch your eye. Whether you're looking for a casual date or a serious dating relationship with the love of your life, Match.com has thousands of smart, sexy, attractive Bodega date possibilities meant just for you.
Bodega Bay, Camp Meeker, Cazadero, Cotati, Dillon Beach, Duncans Mills, El Verano, Eldridge, Forestville, Fort Ross, Freestone, Fulton, Geyserville, Glen Ellen, Graton, Guerneville, Healdsburg, Inverness, Jenner, Kenwood, Larkfield, Marshall, Mirabel Park, Monte Rio, Nicasio, Occidental, Olema, Penngrove, Petaluma, Point Reyes Station, Rio Nido, Rohnert Park, Russian River, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Sheridan, Tomales, Valley Ford, Villa Grande, Windsor view all states »
Asian , Black , Catholic , Christian , Divorced , Free Online Dating, Gay Singles, Gay Dating, Jewish , Lesbian Singles, Single Parents, view all communities »