text:
There are 7 Wonders of Oregon, and they're not just for looking at. To truly experience our Wonders, you have to get out of the car, hike down from the scenic vista and feel them beneath your feet.
Just remember: This is Oregon. So how you go about doing that is entirely up to you.
an Oregon Story7 Wonders of Oregon
There are 7 Wonders of the World, and not a single one of them is here in Oregon. All we can figure is whoever came up with the list must have never set foot here. So we see your Wonders, world and we raise you these seven of our own: Mt. Hood:…Continue reading this story…
an ItineraryOvernight at Mt. Hood's Paradise Park
I've traipsed all over Mt. Hood past Burnt Lake and up to Zigzag Mountain, over to McNeil Point, nearly to the top of Barrett Spur, out to Owl Point, through Elk Meadows and up Gnarl Ridge. I've been to the summit four times, circled around…Continue reading this story…
an ItineraryEscape to the Wallowa Mountains
My husband and I have come to Joseph, a small town nestled at the base of the Wallowa Mountains, to escape the bustle and pull of our everyday lives. Joseph combines the creativity of a thriving arts community with the hospitality and wild beauty of…Continue reading this story…
Find Things to See & Do
When you travel to Oregon Wine Country, it's easy to take a taste of Oregon home with you, thanks to the Oregon Wines Fly Free program offered by Travel Oregon, Alaska Airlines and the Oregon Wine Board.Learn More About Wines Fly Free Oregon Wines Fly Free
Cities, Regions, Questions & Answers Planning Your Trip
Get on the road with Roadtrippers
We've partnered with Roadtrippers to provide a great way to plan a trip around Oregon. Packed with all the great resources you'll find on TravelOregon.com, the Oregon Roadtrippers experience gets you from Point A to Point B (and C, D, and E), suggests stuff to do on the way, and let's you take it with you on your smartphone.
Where is Oregon, anyway?
Not familiar with U.S. geography? Oregon is on the West Coast, right between Washington and California. Some people think it's the best thing about the West Coast, and of course they're right.
Made up of seven diverse regions, Oregon has the ocean, mountains, valleys, high desert, cities, small towns, and almost everything in between.
Have a question? Ask Oregon
What should we do and see in Central Oregon in September?
Hi! You're in for a treat. Central Oregon in September is so beautiful. I have several recommendations for you. Don't miss the High Desert Museum, which presents natural and cultural history and also has live animals on site. For hiking, try Smith Rock State Park, the Deschutes River Trail, or the Cascade Lakes region. Tumalo Falls is near Bend and easy to access. The Newberry National Monument…


text:
Hazlitt Pinot Gris 750ml$18.64Hazlitt Red Cat NV 750ml$8.94Hazlitt Red Cat Fizz 750ml$12.44Hazlitt Riesling Dry 750ml$14.94
Hazlitt Red Cat NV
Hazlitt - New York - United States - Finger Lakes - Seneca Lake
New York state has a relatively long history of wine-making and vineyard cultivation, with vineyards in the region dating back to the Dutch settlements of the 17th century. As such, the region has slowly discovered the unique qualities of their terroir, and has developed a distinctive set of grape varietals which have gone on to represent the state and make their wines both unique and highly regarded. New York state has four key wine producing areas Lake Erie AVA, Finger Lakes AVA, Hudson River and Long Island, each making the most of their relatively cool climate and characterful terroirs. The strong blend of both traditional and contemporary wine making methods found in this region has led to New York state being responsible for many of the finest and most interesting wines to come out of the United States.
Of all the New World wine countries, perhaps the one which has demonstrated the most flair for producing high quality wines - using a combination of traditional and forward-thinking contemporary methods - has been the United States of America. For the past couple of centuries, the United States has set about transforming much of its suitable land into vast vineyards, capable of supporting a wide variety of world-class grape varietals which thrive on both the Atlantic and the Pacific coastlines. Of course, we immediately think of sun-drenched California in regards to American wines, with its enormous vineyards responsible for the New World's finest examples of Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot based wines, but many other states have taken to viticulture in a big way, with impressive results. Oregon, Washington State and New York have all developed sophisticated and technologically advanced wine cultures of their own, and the output of U.S wineries is increasing each year as more and more people are converted to their produce.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Skip to this page's content
Photograph by Nick Woolley, My Shot
Soaking in the views of Canyonlands National Park in Utah from inside Colonnade Arch along the rim of Labyrinth Canyon.
(This photo and caption were submitted to My Shot.)
More »
© 1996-2015 National Geographic Society. All rights reserved.


text:
World Heritage List Nominations
Only countries that have signed the World Heritage Convention, pledging to protect their natural and cultural heritage, can submit nomination proposals for properties on their territory to be considered for inclusion in UNESCO's World Heritage List.
Proposed for review
Cultural, Natural, Mixed
Nomination process
Tentative List
The first step a country must take is to make an 'inventory' of its important natural and cultural heritage sites located within its boundaries. This 'inventory' is known as the Tentative List, and provides a forecast of the properties that a State Party may decide to submit for inscription in the next five to ten years and which may be updated at any time. It is an important step since the World Heritage Committee cannot consider a nomination for inscription on the World Heritage List unless the property has already been included on the State Party's Tentative List.
The Nomination File
By preparing a Tentative List and selecting sites from it, a State Party can plan when to present a nomination file. The World Heritage Centre offers advice and assistance to the State Party in preparing this file, which needs to be as exhaustive as possible, making sure the necessary documentation and maps are included. The nomination is submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review and to check it is complete. Once a nomination file is complete the World Heritage Centre sends it to the appropriate Advisory Bodies for evaluation.
The Advisory Bodies
A nominated property is independently evaluated by two Advisory Bodies mandated by the World Heritage Convention: the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) and the World Conservation Union (IUCN), which respectively provide the World Heritage Committee with evaluations of the cultural and natural sites nominated. The third Advisory Body is the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM), an intergovernmental organization which provides the Committee with expert advice on conservation of cultural sites, as well as on training activities.
The World Heritage Committee
Once a site has been nominated and evaluated, it is up to the intergovernmental World Heritage Committee to make the final decision on its inscription. Once a year, the Committee meets to decide which sites will be inscribed on the World Heritage List. It can also defer its decision and request further information on sites from the States Parties.
The Criteria for Selection
To be included on the World Heritage List, sites must be of outstanding universal value and meet at least one out of ten selection criteria. These criteria are explained in the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention which, besides the text of the Convention, is the main working tool on World Heritage. The criteria are regularly revised by the Committee to reflect the evolution of the World Heritage concept itself.
Until the end of 2004, World Heritage sites were selected on the basis of six cultural and four natural criteria. With the adoption of the revised Operational Guidelines, only one set of ten criteria exists.
Format for the nomination of properties for inscription on the World Heritage List
Acrobat documents
English French
Nominations may be submitted at any time during the year, but only those nominations that are "complete" (see paragraph 132) and received by the Secretariat on or before 1st February* will be considered for inscription on the World Heritage List by the World Heritage Committee during the following year.
Operational Guidelines annex 5
Format of a Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, and of a retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value
Deadline*: 1st February of the year preceding the one in which the approval of the Committee is requested.
Operational Guidelines annex 10
Minor modifications to the boundaries of world heritage properties
Deadline*: 1st February of the year in which the approval of the Committee is requested.
Operational Guidelines annex 11
Form for the submission of factual errors in the Advisory Bodies evaluations
Acrobat documents
English French
Deadline: The original signed version of the completed Factual Errors submission form should be received in English or French by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, no later than 14 days before the opening of the session of the Committee.
Operational Guidelines annex 12
Activities (1)
Events (4)
- Deadline for reception of nominations Jan 31, 2014
- Expert meeting on Improvement to "upstream processes" prior to consideration of nominations by the World Heritage Committee Apr 27, 2010-Apr 29, 2010
- International expert meeting on World Heritage and serial properties and nominations Feb 25, 2010-Feb 27, 2010
- International Expert meeting on World Heritage and buffer zones Mar 11, 2008-Mar 14, 2008
Decisions (2)
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Recalling the conclusions on the "Evaluation of the Cairns Decision" by the 27th session (Decision 27 COM 14), the Decision adopted on the Representivity of the World Heritage List at its 24th session ("Cairns Decision", 2000), subsequently endorsed by the General Assembly of State Parties at its 13th session (2001); and the Resolution on ways and means to ensure a representative World Heritage List adopted by the General Assembly at its 12th session (1999),
2. Further recalling that the World Heritage Convention establishes a system of international co-operation and assistance for the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage,
3. Recognising the need to increase the technical and administrative capacity of the World Heritage systems, to encourage growth of under-represented categories and geographical coverage, and acknowledge the work constraints of the Committee, the Advisory Bodies, World Heritage Centre and States Parties to achieve this objective,
4. Noting with interest the results of the ICOMOS and IUCN analyses, as well as additional analyses undertaken by the World Heritage Centre as presented in document WHC-04/28.COM/13,
5. Concerned in particular with the conclusion that constraints and gaps in the World Heritage List primarily relate to lack of technical capacity to prepare adequate assessments and inventories of heritage properties, to promote and prepare nominations and relate to the lack of an appropriate legal and management framework;
6. Emphasizing that Tentative Lists are an effective and indispensable tool in the identification of potential World Heritage properties at national and (sub)regional level, and thereby contributing to the representativity of the World Heritage List,
7. Considering that these concerns are already essential elements of the "Cairns Decision" that have, however, not been fully implemented,
8. Further emphasizing that all issues addressed by the "Cairns Decision" need full and adequate implementation and that the World Heritage Centre and States Parties in the coming years should focus on those elements that have not been sufficiently addressed such as the development of balanced Tentative Lists and capacity building,
9. Recalls that the Committee had previously decided:
a) to make available to all stakeholders all appropriate statutory World Heritage documentation, including documentation on the pre-, during and post-inscription process of World Heritage properties,
b) to encourage the increased participation of local authorities, civil society organizations and populations in the identification of the cultural and natural heritage of States Parties,
c) to implement regional, and, as appropriate, sub-regional programmes based on results of Periodic Reporting to increase the State Parties' capacity for the identification, nomination, and conservation of World Heritage properties,
d) to encourage States Parties to initiate and complete national inventories for cultural and natural heritage,
e) to review the effectiveness and appropriateness of national legal and institutional frameworks and policies and to provide advice to States Parties, upon their request, on reform of national, legal and institutional frameworks and policies,
f) to identify national, regional and international existing institutions, facilities and networks that offer training in heritage conservation and management and that can participate in the implementation of capacity building strategies and programmes;
10. Considers that capacity-building should be strategic, comprehensive, and institutionalised, and that it should focus, in particular on the identification of potential properties, preparation of representative Tentative Lists, preparation of nominations, conservation action and management of properties;
11. Calls upon
a) States Parties, the World Heritage Centre and other partners to significantly increase their support to States Parties, in particular those less represented in the List, in the identification of cultural, natural and mixed properties of potential outstanding universal value, as well as in the preparation of nomination dossiers ;
b) the Advisory Bodies (ICOMOS, ICCROM, IUCN) to increase their support to States Parties, in particular those less represented in the List, in the identification of cultural, natural and mixed properties of potential outstanding universal value;
12. Requests IUCN and ICOMOS to complete their analyses of the Tentative Lists, work on the gaps in the World Heritage List with due consideration to all States Parties and regions of the world and continue their thematic studies;
13. Further requests the World Heritage Centre, in co-operation with States Parties, ICOMOS, IUCN, ICCROM, appropriate scientific institutions, selected governmental and non-governmental experts, appropriate ntergovernmental and non-governmental organizations and other relevant partners, to convene, as soon as possible and not later than March 2005, a special meeting of experts of all regions with the following aims:
a) make specific proposals to enable States Parties to better identify natural, cultural and mixed properties of potential outstanding universal value. Such proposals should include a reflection on the concept of Outstanding Universal Value as defined by the World Heritage Convention and in the context of regions, including cultural and biogeographical regions – and, as appropriate, sub regions -, with a view to compiling representative Tentative Lists, as well as the elaboration of a comparative analysis and evaluation of the Tentative Lists, and a compilation of best practices in the preparation of such lists. At a minimum, the proposals should generate the conditions to ensure that by 2007 all States Parties have submitted Tentative Lists, which are substantially in accordance with Article 11 of the World Heritage Convention and its Operational Guidelines,
b) in the framework of Article 7 of the World Heritage Convention, make specific proposals to enable less-represented and non-represented States Parties to improve the quality of nominations and, consequently, the success rate of inscriptions on the World Heritage List of properties from such States Parties. At a minimum, by 2007 the proposals should lead to a decrease of at least 30% in the number of such less-represented and nonrepresented States Parties,
c) in the framework of Article 7 of the World Heritage Convention, make specific proposals to enable States Parties - in particular those lessrepresented and non-represented - to identify sufficient funding sources for the sustainable conservation of the properties thus inscribed. Such proposals could include the creation of inter-institutional and inter-sectoral site commissions and the networking of properties in order to ensure their adequate monitoring, management, including traditional management mechanisms, involvement of local populations and sustainable conservation. At a minimum, by 2007 the proposals should lead to the removal from the World Heritage List in Danger of at least 20% of the properties inscribed on that List,
d) on the basis of the refinement of the analysis referred to in paragraph 4 make specific proposals for the follow–up of such analysis. At a minimum, by 2007 such proposals should lead to the elaboration of regional – and, as appropriate, sub regional- programs, as well as to the adoption and harmonization of regional – and, as appropriate, sub regional- action plans fully consistent with the pertinent periodic reports;
14. Takes note of the offer by the Russian Federation to host the special meeting of experts of all regions referred to in paragraph 13 above;
15. Further requests the World Heritage Centre to report on the proposals and conclusions of the special meeting of experts of all regions referred to in paragraph 13, for consideration by the Committee at its 29th session (2005);
16. Decides to apply at its 29th session (2005) the mechanism set out in paragraphs 1 to 5 of Decision 27 COM 14, and requests the World Heritage Centre to distribute as soon as possible the full list of nominations admissible for examination by such session;
17. Also decides, on an experimental and transitory basis, to apply the following mechanism at its 30th session (2006):
a) examine up to two complete nominations per State Party, provided that at least one of such nominations concerns a natural property; and,
b) set at 45 the annual limit on the number of nominations it will review , inclusive of nominations deferred and referred by previous sessions of the Committee, extensions (except minor modifications of limits of the property), transboundary nominations, serial nominations and nominations submitted on an emergency basis,
c) the order of priorities for the examination of new nominations shall remain as decided by the Committee at its 24th session (2000):
(i) nominations of properties submitted by States Parties with no properties inscribed on the List,
(ii) nominations of properties from any State Party that illustrate unrepresented or less represented categories of natural and cultural categories,
(iii) other nominations,
(iv) when applying this priority system, date of receipt of full and complete nominations by the World Heritage Centre shall be used as secondary determining factor within the category where the number of nomination fixed by the Committee has been reached;
18. Further decides to examine the transitory mechanism set out in paragraph 17 at its 31st session (2007), on the basis of:
a) the results of the process set out in paragraphs 13 and 15 above,
b) the extent to which the nominations presented at its 30th session (2006) contribute to the aim of a representative World Heritage List.
VI.1 The Committee noted the reports of the following four reform groups and sincerely thanked the States Parties who had participated in their work.
Task Force on the implementation of the Convention
Chair: C. Cameron (Canada)
Rapporteur: K. Keeffe (Australia)
Working Group on the Representativity of the World Heritage List
Chair: H.E. Ambassador Mr Olabiyi B.J. Yai (Benin)
Rapporteur: H.E. Mr M. Peek (Australia)
Working Group on Equitable Representation in the World Heritage Committee
Chair: H.E. Ambassador J. Musitelli (France)
Rapporteur: D. Masek (Czech Republic)
International Expert Meeting on the Revision of the Operational Guidelines, Canterbury, United Kingdom (10-14 April 2000)
Chair: C. Young (United Kingdom)
Rapporteur: K. Kovacs (United States of America)
VI.2 In view of the large number of detailed recommendations prepared by the four groups listed above, and given that there was limited time for discussion, the Committee focused its discussions on the reform process by examining four specific issues as follows:
The Committee recalled that the Task Force for the Implementation of the Convention, chaired by Ms Christina Cameron (Canada), had proposed that sub-committees be established to facilitate the work of the World Heritage Committee and the World Heritage Centre.
The Committee also recalled that the twenty-fourth session of the Bureau (June 2000) had requested that there be further examination of the possibility of a sub-committee system and that the Special Session of the Bureau (Budapest, 2-4 October 2000) had discussed the proposal further with reference to a paper prepared by the United Kingdom.
As requested by the Special Session of the Bureau, a paper on the feasibility and implications of a sub-committee system was prepared and examined by the twenty-fourth extraordinary session of the Bureau (WHC-2000/CONF.203/6).
The four objectives for proposing changes to the existing Bureau and Committee system were to:
Objective 1 Facilitate the work of the World Heritage Centre, Objective 2 Facilitate the work of the World Heritage Committee and allow it to devote more time to general policy discussions for the implementation of the Convention, Objective 3 Improve the prior examination of various issues submitted to the Committee, and Objective 4 Increase representation of States Parties in the work of the Committee.
The Committee decided to:
- Revise the calendar and cycle of World Heritage meetings from June/November to April/June (see Annex VIII)
- Abolish the extraordinary sessions of the Bureau and Committee
- Implement changes to the calendar and cycle of the Bureau and the Committee in 2002 (Note: Hungary, who hopes to be host country to the Committee in 2002, expressed their agreement to this date for the introduction of a new calendar and cycle)
- Introduce an Item A and B decision-making system (Item A: items which are the subject of consensus for adoption and, Item B: items requiring discussion by the Committee)
- Enforce Rule 22.2 of Committee's Rules of Procedure to limit the time allowed to each speaker (especially if they are an observer)
- Defer the examination of nominations received in 2001 to the year 2003. This deferral would imply only a limited pause (7 months) in the nomination process, and allow the necessary transitional adjustments
- Introduce a biennial budget for the World Heritage Fund to harmonize with the UNESCO budget cycle
- Review any changes to the calendar, cycle and meetings of the Bureau (or sub-committees) and the Committee after they have been in operation for 4 years
The revised deadline for nominations would be 1 February. Evaluations would be due from IUCN and/or ICOMOS 6 weeks prior to the April Bureau.
Referrals of nominations would be re-examined by the Bureau in the year following initial examination before proceeding to the Committee for decision.
The deadline for receipt of international assistance requests and state of conservation reports would also be on 1 February.
During the transition period the following timetable would apply:
|Nominations received by
|To be examined by the Bureau
|To be examined by the Committee
|1 July 2000
|June/July 2001
|December 2001
|31 December 20001
|April 2002
|June 2002
|1 February 2002
|April 2003
|June 2003
|1 February 2003
|April 2004
|June 2004
The Committee decided to defer a decision on the introduction of a sub-committee system or the extension of the Bureau session from six to eight days, until the effectiveness of the other reforms (changed statutory meeting calendar and cycle, limitation in number of nominations to be examined each year and reforms to meeting documentation) could be assessed at a later date. It was thus agreed that reform should proceed gradually. Greater efforts were to be given to structuring the work of the Bureau to focus its work. The ordering of the agenda by topics was considered useful as was the use of informal ad hoc working groups to expedite the work of the Bureau and Committee.
The Delegate of Hungary presented a document distributed to the Committee entitled "A Hungarian World Heritage Vision". The document refers to the need to address the balance of representation of the World Heritage List in favour of under- represented or non-represented countries. It also calls for a more prominent role for tentative lists. The Delegate of Hungary suggested that with a pause in the examination of nominations in 2002, the twenty-sixth session of the Committee in 2002 could concentrate on the preparation of a Strategic Plan and other issues important for the future implementation of the Convention.
The Committee noted that the Task Force on the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention had recommended a number of reforms to the documents prepared for World Heritage statutory meetings.
Following a presentation by the Director of the World Heritage Centre, the Committee agreed that the objectives of reforming meeting documentation would be to:
- facilitate decision-making and increase efficiency
- streamline document preparation
- provide transparency and equity of access to documentation
- reduce costs.
The Committee decided that reform of the system of documentation, as proposed by the Director of the World Heritage Centre, would include:
- maintaining Reports of the Rapporteurs
- reducing the number of working documents by compiling one decision-making guide to be distributed 2 weeks prior to the meeting
- including additional working documents only in exceptional cases - e.g. Strategic Planning documents, or changes to Reference Texts (Operational Guidelines, Rules of Procedure etc.)
- all other documents as Information Documents.
To enhance communication between the World Heritage Centre and the Committee, the Committee also decided, as proposed by the Director of the World Heritage Centre, that the Centre would,
- prepare a regular report referencing documents currently available
- organize two information meetings per year for Committee members at UNESCO Headquarters (non-Committee members to attend as observers)
- continue to prepare a Secretariat Report to the Bureau and Committee but improve its structure and content.
The Committee requested the World Heritage Centre to implement as many of these reforms as are feasible before the twenty-fifth session of the Committee.
The Committee recalled that in October 1999 the twelfth General Assembly,
- adopted by consensus a Resolution underlining the importance of an equitable representation of the World Heritage Committee and the need to increase the number of its members
- requested the World Heritage Committee to submit proposals on this matter to the thirteenth General Assembly of States Parties and to inscribe an item on the agenda of the thirty-first General Conference in 2001.
The Committee noted that in 2000, a Working Group on Equitable Representation within the World Heritage Committee was established under the Chairmanship of H.E. Ambassador J. Musitelli (France). The report of the Working Group was discussed at the June and October 2000 sessions of the Bureau (WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.9).
The Committee noted the proposals on the equitable representation of the Committee developed following the Special Session of the Bureau session (WHC-2000/CONF.204/6) and decided to recommend the following Draft Resolution for adoption by the 13th General Assembly:
The General Assembly of States Parties to the Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage,
Recalling Article 8, paragraph 2, of the Convention which stipulates that "Election of members of the Committee shall ensure an equitable representation of the different regions and cultures of the world";
Recalling Article 9 of the Convention which stipulates that "The term of office of States members of the World Heritage Committee shall extend from the end of the ordinary session of the General Conference during which they are elected until the end of its third subsequent ordinary session";
Recalling the Resolution of the 7th General Assembly of States Parties (1989);
Considering the representivity of the World Heritage List could be enhanced through the increased participation in the work of the Committee of States Parties whose heritage is currently unrepresented in the List;
Considering that the strong interest of States Parties in participating in the work of the World Heritage Committee could be addressed by a more frequent rotation of Committee members;
Invites the States Parties to the World Heritage Convention, to voluntarily reduce their term of office from six to four years;
Encourages States Parties that are not members of the Committee to make use of their right to participate in meetings of the World Heritage Committee as observers;
Discourages States Parties from seeking consecutive terms of office in the World Heritage Committee;
Decides that before each election of Committee members, the President of the General Assembly of States Parties will inform States Parties of the situation of the representation of regions and cultures in the World Heritage Committee and World Heritage List;
Decides to amend its Rules of Procedure as follows:
New Rule to be inserted after Rule 13.1
A certain number of seats may be reserved for State Parties who do not have sites on the World Heritage List, upon decision of the World Heritage Committee at the session that precedes the General Assembly. Such a ballot for reserved seats would precede the open ballot for the remaining seats to be filled. Unsuccessful candidates in the reserved ballot would be eligible to stand in the open ballot.
Amendment to existing Rule 13.8 (new text in bold)
13.8 Those States obtaining in the first ballot the required majority shall be elected, unless the number of States obtaining that majority is greater than the number of seats to be filled. In that case, the States obtaining the greatest number of votes, up to the number of seats to be filled, shall be declared elected. If the number of States obtaining the majority required is less than the number of seats to be filled, there shall be a second ballot, followed by a third and, if necessary a fourth, to fill the remaining seats. If the number of States obtaining the majority required is less than the number of seats to be filled, there shall be a second ballot. If the number of States obtaining the majority required is still less than the number of seats to be filled there shall be a third and, if necessary a fourth ballot, to fill the remaining seats. For the third and fourth ballots, the voting shall be restricted to the States obtaining the greatest number of votes in the previous ballot, up to a number twice that of the seats remaining to be filled.
Decides that this resolution should be implemented immediately.
The Committee also recommended that the General Assembly organize the agenda of its thirteenth session so that the measures foreseen by these amendments may enter into force at that same session.
In order to implement the new rule to be inserted following Rule 13.1, the Committee decided that one seat be reserved for a State Party not having a site inscribed on the World Heritage List at the date of the thirteenth session of the General Assembly.
The Committee requested the Secretariat to inform all States Parties of the implementation of the new electoral procedures, particularly those States Parties which may fulfill the conditions to be candidates for the reserved seat.
The Committee requested the Secretariat to prepare with the involvement of interested States Parties and the advisory bodies, a proposal for the twenty-sixth session of the World Heritage Committee for further amendment to Rule 13 of the Rules of Procedures of the General Assembly relating to the election of members of the World Heritage Committee in order to ensure an equitable representation of the different regions and cultures of the world. This proposal is to be based on a thorough analysis of the consequences of the proposed changes and the adjustments that would be required to the election procedures.
The Committee also decided to revise the Rules of Procedure of the World Heritage Committee as follows:
New Rule 4.3
"In determining the place of the next session, the Committee shall give due regard to the need to ensure an equitable rotation among the different regions and cultures of the world."
New Rule 20.4
"In appointing consultative bodies, due regard shall be given to the need to ensure an equitable representation of the different regions and cultures of the world."
New Rule 21.3
"In appointing subsidiary bodies, due regard shall be given to the need to ensure an equitable representation of the different regions and cultures of the world."
The Committee examined and discussed the recommendations of the Working Group on the Representivity of the World Heritage List chaired by Ambassador Yai (Benin), which had been transmitted by the Special Session of the Bureau with some changes.
The Committee recognized that the issue of representivity of the World Heritage List was the most difficult of the reform issues under consideration by the Committee. The Committee noted that more effective use of tentative lists and greater regulation of the ever-increasing number of nominations was required. It was agreed that other measures, such as assistance for capacity-building would be vital for ensuring the representation of sites from all regions on the World Heritage List.
The Committee therefore agreed on a decision presented in 5 sections:
- Respecting the Convention
- Tentative Lists
- Nominations
- Resolution of the Twelfth General Assembly, 1999
- Capacity Building for under-represented Regions
With reference to Section 3, the Delegate of Hungary asked that his request for a change in the deadline for submission of nominations to be examined in 2002, from December 2000 as agreed by the Committee, to April 2001, be noted in the Report. The Committee agreed to note this request by the Delegate of Hungary but stated that in the interest of a smooth transition, the majority position of the Committee will be maintained.
With the exception of Hungary, the text of the decision was adopted by all members of the Committee. A letter from the Italian Government is included as Annex IX of this report.
The Committee agreed to transmit its decision to the Thirteenth General Assembly of States Parties in 2001.
1. Respecting the Convention
The Committee reaffirmed the Convention for the Protection of the World Natural and Cultural Heritage as an instrument of consensus, cooperation and accord between States Parties and takes particular note of Articles 6 (1) and 6 (2) and Article 11 (1):
(i) Whilst fully respecting the sovereignty of the States on whose territory the cultural and natural heritage mentioned in Articles 1 and 2 is situated, and without prejudice to property right provided by national legislation, the States Parties to this Convention recognize that such heritage constitutes a world heritage for whose protection it is the duty of the international community as a whole to co-operate (Article 6 (1)
(ii) The States Parties undertake, in accordance with the provisions of this Convention, to give their help in the identification, protection, conservation and presentation of the cultural and natural heritage . . . if the States on whose territory it is situated so request (Article 6 (2)).
(iii) Every State Party to this Convention shall, in so far as possible, submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of property forming part of the cultural and natural heritage, situated in its territory and suitable for inclusion in the list . . . (Article 11 (1).
Decisive cooperative action is required by the Committee and States Parties to ensure that the World Heritage List is fully representative of the world's natural and cultural heritage.
2. Tentative Lists
(i) In the future, consistent with Article 11, .the tentative lists of cultural and natural sites should be used, as a planning tool to reduce the imbalances in the World Heritage List. States Parties are reminded of the invitation to submit tentative lists in conformity with Article 11 of the Convention. The Committee should revise paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Operational Guidelines to extend to natural sites its decision not to examine nominations of sites for inscription if the property does not appear on a tentative list.
(ii) The advisory bodies and the World Heritage Centre should proceed with an analysis of sites inscribed on the World Heritage List and the tentative list on a regional, chronological, geographical and thematic basis. This analysis should be undertaken as soon as possible, taking into account the workload on advisory bodies and the financial implications of this work, particularly in regard to the large number of sites on the tentative list. For this reason, the work should be undertaken in two parts, sites inscribed on the World Heritage List and sites on the tentative list. The analysis will provide States Parties with a clear overview of the present situation, and likely trends in the short to medium term with a view to identifying under-represented categories.
(iii) The advisory bodies should take into account in their analyses:
- The diversity and particularities of natural and cultural heritage in each region,
- The results of regional Periodic Reporting, and
- The recommendations of the regional and thematic meetings on the harmonisation of tentative lists held since 1984 and those on the Global Strategy organised since 1994.
(iv) The World Heritage Centre and advisory bodies should communicate the results of the analyses to the World Heritage Committee and, following the Committee's examination, the results should be conveyed to States Parties to the Convention, together with the Committee's recommendations. This will allow them to prepare, revise and/or harmonise their tentative list, taking into account, where appropriate, regional considerations, and to take the results of the analyses into consideration for the submission of future nominations.
(v) The results of the analyses should be communicated no later than 30 September 2001.
In order to promote the effective management of the increasing size of the World Heritage List, the Committee at each ordinary session will set the maximum number of nominations to be considered. In the first instance and on an interim basis, it is proposed that at the twenty-seventh session of the Committee in 2003, the number of nominations examined by the Committee will be limited to a maximum of 30 new sites.
In order to determine which sites should be given priority for consideration, all nominations to be considered at the twenty- seventh session of the Committee must be received in full by the new due date of 1 February 2002 agreed by the Committee as part of the change of cycle of meetings. No State Parties should submit more than one nomination, except those States Parties that have no sites inscribed on the World Heritage List who will have the opportunity to propose two or three nominations.
In order to address the issue of representivity of the List the following criteria will be applied in order of priority:2
In the event that the number of nominations received exceeds the maximum number set by the Committee, the following priority system will be applied each year by the World Heritage Centre before nominations are transmitted to the advisory bodies for evaluation, in determining which sites should be taken forward for consideration:
- Nominations of sites submitted by a State Party with no sites inscribed on the List;3
- Nominations of sites from any State Party that illustrate un-represented or less represented categories of natural and cultural properties, as determined by analyses prepared by the Secretariat and the Advisory Bodies and reviewed and approved by the Committee;
- Other nominations.
When applying this priority system, date of receipt of full and complete nominations by the World Heritage Centre shall be used as the secondary determining factor within the category where the number of nominations established by the Committee is reached.
In addition to the approved maximum number of sites, the Committee will also consider nominations deferred, or referred, from previous meetings and changes to the boundaries of already inscribed properties. The Committee may also decide to consider, on an emergency basis, situations falling under paragraph 67 of the Operational Guidelines.
Transition arrangements
Committee meeting, December 2001
No change to existing system.
Committee meeting June 2002
Full and complete nominations received by the World Heritage Centre prior to 31 December 2000 will be considered together with nominations deferred, or referred, from previous meetings and changes to the boundaries of already inscribed properties. The Committee may also decide to consider, on an emergency basis, situations falling under paragraph 67 of the Operational Guidelines.
Committee meeting June 2003
Nominations to be submitted by 1 February 2002 and prioritized in accordance with the system as described above.
The system described above is to be reviewed by the Committee after two full years of operation.
4. Resolution of the Twelfth General Assembly, 1999
The Committee decided to call on States Parties concerned to inform the Committee with a minimum of delay, of measures taken in the implementation of the clauses of the Resolution adopted by the Twelfth General Assembly (Paragraph B) that invites all States Parties that already have a substantial number of sites inscribed on the World Heritage List to:
(i) Apply paragraph 6 (vii) of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention:
- by spacing voluntarily their nominations according to conditions that they will define, and/or
- by proposing only properties falling into categories still under-represented, and/or
- by linking each of their nominations with a nomination presented by a State Party whose heritage is under- represented, or
- by deciding, on a voluntary basis, to suspend the presentation of new nominations.
ii) Initiate and encourage bilateral and multilateral co-operation with States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented in the List within the framework of the preparation of tentative lists, nominations and training programmes,
iii) Give priority to the re-examination of their tentative lists within the framework of regional consultations and to the preparation of periodic reports.
5. Capacity Building for Under-represented Regions
The Committee decided that cooperative efforts in capacity-building and training are necessary to ensure that the World Heritage List is fully representative and agrees that:
(i) The World Heritage Centre should continue to promote training programmes, preferably at the regional level, aimed at allowing States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented to be better versed in the Convention and to better implement the measures under Article 5. These primarily concern the identification, management, protection, enhancement and conservation of heritage. Such programmes should also assist States Parties to acquire and/or consolidate their expertise, in the preparation and harmonisation of their tentative lists and the preparation of nominations.
(ii) The advisory bodies and the World Heritage Centre should use the opportunity of evaluation missions to hold regional training workshops to assist under-represented States in the methods of preparation of their tentative list and nominations. Appropriate financial and human resources should be provided through the World Heritage Centre budget process to undertake such workshops.
(iii) Requests by States Parties whose heritage is non- represented or under-represented should be given a high priority when the portion of the World Heritage budget relating to Preparatory Assistance in preparing nominations is developed.
(iv) The order of priorities for the granting of international assistance, as defined in paragraphs 91 and 113-114 of the Operational Guidelines, should be revised in a manner consistent with the recommendations of the International Expert Meeting on the Revision of the Operational Guidelines (Canterbury, United Kingdom) to improve the representivity of the World Heritage List and to be coherent with the Global Strategy. Beyond the conditions provided for by the Convention, and subject to the conclusions of the evaluation of international assistance, the new priority order should take into account:
- The necessity of encouraging the beneficiary countries to develop measures for the implementation of the Convention in their country,
- The order of priority for the examination of the nominations for inscription,
- The state of preparation of the beneficiary countries, and
- The necessity of giving priority to the least developed countries (LDCs) and countries with a low revenue.
(v) Regional Plans of Action should be updated and developed within the framework of the Global Strategy. These should specify for each targeted region and State Party, the objective, action needed, responsibility, timetable for adoption, state of play and a mechanism to report on progress in implementing these at each session of the World Heritage Committee. In order to underline their incentive nature, the Plans of Action should highlight the actions by the States Parties concerned, notably in application of Article 5 of the Convention, and should mention the bilateral or multilateral co-operation programmes in the field of heritage in general, for the elaboration in particular of nominations.
(vi) The next UNESCO Medium-Term Strategy should stress the necessity of adopting an intersectoral policy aimed at better implementing the Convention. From the 2002-2003 biennium, an intersectoral project should be developed and implemented to encourage the States Parties whose heritage is still under- represented to reinforce their capacity to protect, conserve and enhance it.
The Committee noted that the Hungarian authorities had prepared a proposal for the establishment of a Heritage Partnership Programme to be examined by the Committee at its twenty-fourth session in Cairns (WHC-2000/CONF.204/19).
The Committee decided that a review of the implementation and effectiveness of such measures should take place not later than 2003.
The Director of the World Heritage Centre thanked English Heritage and the Government of the United Kingdom for having organized, jointly with the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, the International Expert Meeting on the Revision to the Operational Guidelines in Canterbury, England, from 10 to 14 April, 2000. He also thanked the Government of the United Kingdom for having offered to provide an additional financial contribution to this important activity in 2001.
Following a report on the results of the Expert Meeting by Christopher Young (United Kingdom), who had chaired the meeting, the Committee decided that the Operational Guidelines be restructured according to the proposed new overall framework (WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.10).
The Committee requested that the Operational Guidelines be simplified, streamlined and presented in a user-friendly form with most of the existing and new supporting material to be moved to annexes and other documentation. The Committee asked that the Operational Guidelines be organized in a logical way, returning to the fundamental principles of the World Heritage Convention. The revised Operational Guidelines will introduce for the first time a consolidated section on the Protection and Conservation of World Heritage Properties.
IUCN welcomed the excellent work done at the Canterbury Expert Meeting to propose a reshaping of the Operational Guidelines. IUCN agreed that a comprehensive overhaul of this key document was required rather than the past practice of incremental, ad hoc amendments. IUCN expressed their wish to contribute to a process of revisions and proposed five objectives for the revised Operational Guidelines:
- The integration of cultural and natural criteria while maintaining the current wording of the natural criteria
- The close link between concepts of integrity and authenticity
- Stronger emphasis placed on site management
- Emphasis on reactive monitoring as nothing does more for the credibility of the Convention
- More creative use of tentative lists.
The Committee decided that the process for revising the Operational Guidelines should be co-ordinated by the World Heritage Centre through a collaborative process involving representatives of States Parties, the advisory bodies and the Secretariat. It was agreed that revised Operational Guidelines should reflect different regional and cultural perspectives. The Committee agreed to the following phased approach to the revision of the Operational Guidelines. The Director of the World Heritage Centre noted that additional human and financial resources would be required for the Centre to co-ordinate this process.
|Phase I
|Meeting at UNESCO Headquarters in Paris in January 2001 to define the process for revising the Operational Guidelines
|Phase II
|Preparation by the Secretariat of a first draft revised text in English and French to reflect all current proposals for revision and showing the source of the proposed revisions
|Phase III
|Circulation of the revised text to all States Parties and posting of revised text on the Web
|Phase IV
|Contributions in writing from States Parties
|Phase V
|Meeting to refine new Operational Guidelines, section by section
|Phase VI
|Submission of revised Operational Guidelines to the twenty-fifth session of the World Heritage Committee in 2001 for decision.
1Full and complete nominations received by the World Heritage Centre prior to 31 December 2000 will be considered together with nominations deferred, or referred, from previous meetings and changes to the boundaries of already inscribed properties. The Committee may also decide to consider, on an emergency basis, situations falling under paragraph 67 of the Operational Guidelines.
2 In nominating properties to the List, States Parties are invited to keep in mind the desirability of achieving a reasonable balance between the numbers of cultural heritage and natural heritage properties included in the World Heritage List (Paragraph 15 of the Operational Guidelines)
3 In evaluating these, and all other nominations, the Advisory Bodies should continue to apply a strict evaluation of criteria as set out in the Operational Guidelines.


text:
November 15, 2013
Classes Available for Healthcare Professionals and Students
Workshop: Customer Service
Sub-category: HR Topics
Register Soon Limited Seats Available!
Saturday, November 15th, 2013
Contact Hrs: 8 hrs.
Time: Saturday 9:00 am-5:00 pm
Cost: $200
Sanford-Brown Institute - Fort Lauderdale
1201 W. Cypress Creek Rd Suite 101
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
or email firstname.lastname@example.com
Registration Information:
Visit the Learning Link page HERE!
Browse Courses by selecting the browsing button.
Register for On Ground Seminars/Workshops or complete Online Activities.
Learning Link offers flexible continuing education that meets the demand in the field of health and wellness. Our continuing education offerings cover current trends in general health and wellness and ensures you have access to in depth, and engaging learning activities to enhance your professional skill set.
Register Today!
By providing your mobile number, you agree to receive text messages from Sanford-Brown via its mobile text message provider. You may opt out of receiving messages by texting the word STOP to 94576, or simply reply with the word STOP to any text message you receive from Sanford-Brown.
While CEC or its mobile text message provider will not charge end users for receiving/responding to promotional messages, depending on the terms of your mobile phone plan, you may incur a cost from your mobile service carrier to receive and respond to any promotional text messages (standard messaging and data rates/fees and other charges may apply). Charges will appear on your mobile phone bill or will be deducted from pre-paid amounts. Current participating/supported carriers are: Alltel, AT&T, Boost, Cellcom, Cellular One, Cellular South, Cincinnati Bell, Cricket, Element Wireless, Golden State Cellular, iWireless, Metro PCS, Nextel, nTelos, Plateau Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile, US Cellular, Verizon Wireless, Viaero Wireless, Virgin, and more.
© Sanford-Brown. All rights reserved.
No information may be duplicated without permission from Sanford-Brown.
Sanford-Brown cannot guarantee employment or salary. Credits earned are unlikely to transfer.
Sanford-Brown is not currently enrolling Students in Massachusetts


text:
We hire candidates from educational programs with basic skills like web designing with internet development, programming information and prepare them for our future skills. All applications are pre-screened primarily based on academic credentials. Short-listed candidates are usually invited for a written analytical/logical test and a subsequent interview as a part of the selection process.
We take experienced professionals from software industries for senior positions. we offer higher career and future choices for knowledgeable professionals in our consumer services.
We need following skills:-
|Submit your resume at firstname.lastname@example.com


text:
Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.
We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you decide that your purchase just isn't for you, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.
Look at our extensive collection of Mont Blanc Product Reviews only at OpticsPlanet. Discover these Mont Blanc reviews, ratings, recommendations and feedback from consumers precisely like you who have experience when using the products. We provide on-line testimonials from the top Mont Blanc categories such as Montblanc Eyeglass Frames Reviews, Montblanc Sunglasses Reviews, Montblanc Eyeglasses w/ Single Vision Lenses Reviews. We know the significance of consumer reviews and having a good understanding and expertise of the products you're intending to buy. These customer written reviews will allow you to make a knowledgeable and intelligent purchase decision. If you'd like to take part in a conversation about Mont Blanc products make certain to take a look at our OpticsPlanet discussion forum. We really wish for you to be comfortable with the Mont Blanc products you buy, so benefit from shoppers such as you which have used and have first-hand knowledge about theses Mont Blanc products.
Connect with OpticsPlanet
Become our fan, follow us, & subscribe for the latest updates and deals
Subscribe to our email list
Sign up and receive $5 Off and get exclusive access to promotions, sales
events, pre-order sales & more!
Contact Information
Toll-Free: 800-504-5897
Intl.: 847-513-6201
Fax: 847-919-3003
Email: email@example.com
Hours of Operation
7AM-8PM CST Mon-Fri9AM-5PM CST Sat-Sun
Our Guarantees


text:
3535 South State & 10920 South State
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Love the Experience
Take a look at what we have currently on our lot. You can use one of our smartbrowser tools below to help make your decision easier. If you have any trouble finding the vehicle you are looking for, please try our CarFinder service and we'll find it for you!
Remember to browse the Pre-Owned Specials for up-to-date promotions, or check out Mark Miller Subaru's Featured Vehicles, highlighting both new Subaru models, and used cars. If we do not currently stock your ideal vehicle, simply complete the CarFinder form and Mark Miller Subaru will try to find it for you!
Two Locations to Serve You!
If you cannot find your ideal vehicle in our current used inventory, take a look at our CarFinder tool. After specifying a search period (1 to 8 weeks) and providing vehicle details, we'll begin the search process for you and send you a notification when a matching vehicle arrives in our inventory. Mark Miller Subaru strives to satisfy customers with a good, solid used car buying experience.
If you are looking for that perfect used car, you've come to the right place. We keep a large inventory of quality used Subaru cars as well as used cars from a variety of manufacturers. Browse our online inventory below or stop by our Sandy and Salt Lake City Utah dealerships and talk to a member of our professional sales staff. We invite our Murray, Provo and Salt Lake City area customers to come take a test drive and our financing experts can tailor a loan or lease to suit your needs and budget. We hope to see you soon.
Mark Miller Subaru's line of used cars for the Salt Lake City, Murray, Provo and Sandy area includes something for everyone. From the reliable Subaru, to models from a variety of other manufacturers, we have a used car for you. Visit our Salt Lake City used car lot at 3535 S. State St. or our Sandy used car located at 10920 South State Street, and take a certified pre-owned Subaru or used car for a test drive. You can also reach us by calling 801-268-3734 for Midtown or 801-553-5200 for South Towne.


text:
Galvin wrote:Hi all, i just got a tent, its a diamantina drysdale 9. I put it up over the weekend to see how easy it was, as ive never put one up. I was very suprised at how easy i found it, i put it up in about 20 mins. The only problem i found were the tent ropes. The ropes have plastic toggle things on them which i presume tighten the ropes to the pegs, i just put the loop over the peg, pull on the end of the rope and it tightens. Sounds easy, and straight forward, yes, but, it cant tighten very much, it starts to slip back if i try to make it nice and tight. Is this so i cant damage the connections to the tent, or am i just not using it properly?? what if it was windy, wouldnt the toggles lossen??? Anyway, if that is all i had trouble with, i think i went well. I even managed to get the tent back in the bag :+
amanda wrote:Getting the tent back into the bag is always the hardest part of a camping trip I find - well done!
Galvin wrote:Thanx for the replies, im glad i was not doing anything wrong with the ropes. The tent did seem very sturdy as it was, it would take a big wind to make it fall over(i hope). I was surprised it came with 2 tents, sort of, an inner tent, and an outer tent ( i hope i dont sound like an idiot, i know nothing about tents :--? ) I think it would be better in the rain like this, are all tents like that?? I think i would like to get better pegs all round, as even putting them in the ground once bent a few :( . The corners have weird flat ones, quite strong i think. Anyway, thankyou again for the advise, i have almost read everything on this site, so i feel armed and ready for the fun ahead :grin: Ill post and tell all of my adventures ::()
Galvin wrote:I even managed to get the tent back in the bag
amanda wrote:After many fights with the tent to get it back in the bag I finally cheated and went to my local camping shop and bought another slightly larger bag for $8. Problem solved! (and the new bag is of a much tougher fabric and less likely to tear).
Blue Bravo wrote:I replaced all the ropes on the tent with larger ones with springs. They provide better support, the spring means they don't pull out of the ground as easily. They are not expensive. Unfortunately the tent suppliers go with the cheapest options.
amanda wrote:Getting the tent back into the bag is always the hardest part of a camping trip I find - well done!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


text:
There are a number of classes within the Benzodiazepines Category: Hypnotic, Anxiolytic, Anti-Seizure, Muscle-Relaxant, and Amnesic.
The Muscle Relaxant category is more common because so many people are prescribed drugs such as Flexeril and Valium. The addictions to these drugs and withdrawal from the drugs are among some of the most avoided topics within Drug Addiction. Depending on the addiction and "flavor" of choice, to walk away from Benzodiazepines will require prolonged treatment, but only after a detoxification to be remembered.
3 Symptoms of the Addiction
1. Unable to cope without the drug
2. Overly concerned with where the medication is at any given time
3. Increasing dose over time
3 Possible Treatment Options
1. Use of SSRI's to help in Detox
2. Taper off the drug
3. Homeopathic Remedies
do not shop at norxshop.com Reply to this Comment
What ever you do not shop at norxshop.com, I have spent $200 in weight loss pills and I have not received any products. I tried my best contacting them but I could not get a hold of any one. Do not shop at norxshop.com
norxshop Reply to this Comment
I strongly disagree.. ill admit i did not recieve my product at first but after multiple emails (which were promptly responded to) they resent my order at no cost to me even though they said it was my problem if they didnt come.. and i recieved my order in full
norxshop Reply to this Comment
I'll back up Brandon on here, i must say i've gotten Clen (weight loss) 17 days.. got 40mcg cause 20mcgs were out of stock at that time. Double dosage for the same price. Stephen did u try contacting them?
NORXSHOP Reply to this Comment
I just bought some products from NORXSHOP and found this site and another about the company not delievering its products. It is really true. I already called my bank but they told me there is nothing they could do.
norxshop.com Reply to this Comment
hey i was wondering how real there medications are! i have recieved all my orders but have seen no results. did u? thanks please email me at email@example.com
RXnorshop Reply to this Comment
I have made two orders to this company they have both shown up in good time. My only concern is if their products are legit.
comment on norxshop Reply to this Comment
i didn't receive my order too..i spend 150 dollars on clan
legit Reply to this Comment
I've been using norx for more than a year and all of their products are legit.. they used to sell them where you could use a credit card, but unfortunately they changed it. It it most likely the person taking whatever medication it is.. isn't doing anything to make the med work.. such as exercising and eating healthy.. because really it does work.. and if you are worried the medication doesnt work well then dont buy it and then do yourself a favor get a gym membership.
Good work though with Reply to this Comment
always received from goldcard-shop.com cant beleive you?


text:
View large image
RRP: kr1215,88
Availability: In stock | Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Top-level performance features and sleek style, for any ride. The Giro Saros is packed with some of Giro's best features like Wind Tunnel™ ventilation and the comfort of the Roc Loc® 5 fit system, for performance and comfort that rivals more expensive helmets. From racing to training to simply rolling with friends, it's the ideal complement to almost any ride.
Key Features:
Technical Specifications:
If ordered before 8pm, delivered by courier next working day. Available on orders placed before 8pm (2pm weekends and Bank Holidays) for delivery next business day. Applies to most delivery addresses within mainland UK.
Please check the stock availability notice on your item when placing your order. This item is: In stock | Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Please remember to add postal time (2-3 working days) to obtain a complete estimate of delivery to your door.
You will receive an email to confirm when your item has been sent.
You can also check the status of your order and individual items by accessing your account details and following the prompts.
Please allow 10 working days from dispatch of your order before notifying us of any late deliveries.
It may be advisable to check with your neighbours to see if a parcel has been left with them, check any outhouses you might have where it may be left if it cannot fit through your letterbox and contact your local sorting office to see if the item has been returned to the depot as undelivered and awaiting collection.
Please see our returns policy.
No more then 1000 characters long please.
Giro Saros Cycling Helmet 2014
RRP kr1215,88
Save: 57%
Save: 63%
Save: 59%
Bell Array Cycling Helmet -Blue/Black- 2014
RRP kr972,68
There are currently no reviews.
Giro Saros Cycling Helmet 2014
Select image


text:
UPDATE: This game has been shutdown and is no longer available
Publisher: Jagex
Playerbase: Low
Graphics: Medium
Type: MMO
EXP Rate: Slow
PvP: None
Platform: Browser
Pros: +Easy to learn +Unique approach to online strategy +Non-competitive
Cons: -Slow growth rate -Game feels too casual -Lack of direction after first age
8Realms Overview
8Realms tasks players with taking a meager village from its ancient days, and growing it through eight "Ages" of progress. Players build, research, gather resources, trade, and conquer in this easy-to-learn HTML-based game. As there is no player-versus-player features, competition instead comes from capturing and holding the most land and luxuries to raise your culture above others.
8Realms Screenshots
8Realms Featured Video
8Realms Full Review
It's safe to say that if you've played one online, browser-based strategy game, you've played them all. As fun and challenging these games may be, almost all follow a general building plan that includes resource management, army management, city building, and conquering your neighbors. The Internet is buzzing with dozens of these games, and it takes some keen development to make one stand out from the crowd. New to this arena is 8Realms, a game published and developed by Jagex, creators of RuneScape. While the building blocks of 8Realms may remind you of War of Legends or Ministry of War, Jagex has dressed up 8Realms to make you look twice.
Putting Out The Fire
Your journey as the leader of an Empire in 8Realms begins with a man named Gary. Yes, we're serious: after logging in, you're launched straight into your village to save the day. The village is burning from a recent barbarian attack, and your first task as ruler is to – with the help of a goofy-looking villager named Gary – put out the fires by clicking on the buildings.
From this noble task of saving the lives of your villagers, you're thrust into the more mundane role of building up your little establishment. With the help of Gary, you'll be building, raiding, and conquering in no time, as the interface is very clear-cut and requires only a little clicking to manage your entire game.
It's All About the Gold
Resource management is essential to managing your budding little Empire, and it begins with three basic resources: Food, Wood, and Stone. These are earned by placing their respective buildings on the map: farmlands and fisheries, lumber mills, and quarries, respectively. These buildings can be upgraded, and additional buildings can also help improve the output of these resources. As your Empire ages – more on that later – you will also gain access to additional resources, including Iron, Coal, Oil, and Aluminum.
Of course, there's one other key resource: gold. Gold is earned through taxing your settlement. You can change your tax rate – and are encouraged to early in the game – at the cost of happiness. If your villagers aren't happy, though, you can always build new things for them that improves their mood while keeping the cash rolling in. Be warned, though: all your resources are limited by the size of your storehouse in each village you own, and that includes gold.
Only the Learned
Research also plays a key role in building your Empire. After building a Library, you can send your most powerful thinkers into hiding for a few hours within its walls, to emerge with new technology. Similar to games like Civilization, research is organized into various trees. Some projects require previous learning to unlock, while others can be learned at any time, with the right amount of gold. Research will introduce new buildings, new units, and even offer bonuses to production and mood. Always be researching.
To aid you on your progress, the game offers Tasks. These quests, found in a Clipboard at the top of your screen, direct you to specific research, building, and army raising goals that will help push your civilization forward. However, some outside research and planning will be required to make the most of tasks, as each city has limited space to build.
Rise and Conquer
Early in 8Realms, you will be tasked with defeating local barbarian troops. These barbarians occupy resources on the map, and attacking these areas with your own troops will let your army bring home the bacon, along with other useful resources. While some areas can only be raided, others can later be captured to establish trade outposts. Barbarians are not always static; they will sometimes come and attack your outposts, so defense is important. Barbarians are also the only enemies your army will face: while you can battle for map control, you cannot attack other players directly.
In order to make your mark on the world outside your walls, you'll need to recruit troops. Troops recruit from the population in each city, and require a certain amount of resources to recruit, as well as cost a certain amount of gold or fuel to maintain. If you can't pay or fuel your troops, you will lose them. Once recruited, these troops can stay in your city to defend it, or march out and capture or raid resources before coming home. All battle is automated in 8Realms, so you simply need to sit back and wait for the Battle Report to come in.
You're Showing Your Age
Basics aside, one of 8Realms' special features is the Age system. Each Empire personally progresses through Ages, or eras of time that reflect their technology, military prowess, and knowledge. 8Realms features – you may have guessed – eight Ages to progress through. These ages are Ancient, Classical, Feudal, Renaissance, Imperial, Industrial, Modern, and Future, and are based on the eras of world history. In addition to new technologies, each age also brings with it an update in the user interface that reflects the era of your civilization.
Your Empire's age is determined by its general progress, counted, in part, completing tasks and obtaining luxuries, and tracked in the hourglass at the top of the screen. Building, researching, and conquering will advance your civilization through each age. At the end of an Age, you may then choose one of several Wonders specific to that Age to build around your city. When complete, you will advance to the next era. Note that you cannot return to older Wonders, which means that you are limited to one from each Era – make your choice carefully, as each offers different bonuses.
Final Verdict: Fair
8Realms has a lot of polish, and Jagex has given life to the game through unique graphics, a sense of humor (which shows itself after completing landmark tasks), and more importantly, a unique competitive edge. It is rare to find an MMORTS that is not designed to pit players in direct combat with each other, and while that lack of PvP may drive some away, it may draw in others who are happy to compete through conquering the map and building their culture. Unfortunately, this also leads 8Realms to have a very casual feel to it: without a threat from others, players can simply check in once or twice a day to make sure their empire continues growing. While the game offers sufficient strategy challenge – dedicating specific cities to specific tasks, transferring resources, and capturing luxuries on the map – to not be labeled as "easy," the game feels more like a single-player game or Facebook social game than a true MMORTS. This title is great for the less competitive and casual strategy player, but those looking to battle their way to the top should look elsewhere.
8Realms Links


text:
I like this guide and you have some very valid arguments and points regarding Trynd. I will try this out over the weekend and see if I can resurrect my love for Tynd. As of right now when I see a Trynd on the opposing team I laugh and reap the benefits of a free kill in every team fight.
I'm still not convinced that Trynd is workable in higher level games. I have had too many games recently where I get Trynd fully farmed and just get shutdown every single team fight. I would really love to be able to play Trynd again as he was my main for over 100 games played but he is just fail in his current state.
I've even tried getting some survivability items to combat this like Banshee's veil for example and it doesn't really help. He is just too easy to completely shutdown. Ignite pretty much makes the bloodlust heal worthless and is a guaranteed kill on Trynd if you time it just after he pops his ult. So many teams run 2-3 ignites (or more) not to mention the smart people that get an executioners calling (even worse!) that even though I run Cleanse 100% of the time there just isn't enough cleanse to save you in most team fights.
Senior Member
OP, you are so right about avarice blades - complete junk but, I can tell by your screenshots and your record that you have yet to really enter the crazy land of hardcore premades and solo Q'rs who know Trynd inside out.
What you have that is wrong - beserker boots are ****. Don't get them.(Tabi or Merc are sooooo much better.)
The main key to Tryndamere is using the Spirit visage. It totally improves your bloodlust skill. It's cheap. Lowers cooldowns. Gives you some MR and health regen. It improves all incomming heals from your teamates too. It's a boss item. I get basic boots& zeal & spirit visage before anything else. Then I get a crit cape - this is the best path to the god-mode state you referred to.
Trynd is so much better right now since the last 2 patches. I can actually play agressive at level 1 against good players.
I see what you're sayin about the Inf Blade Bitterz but, what I find is that with proper use of cleanse and heal spell you can bait people big time at the start with the spirit visage you heal right back up. I find I get more kills this way then trying to out dps people at the start. Once you hit them with a pickaxe they know to stay back and make sure they dont get pwnt but, when you make it look like you are dying then the greed causes them to take a chance on you and you can cleanse/heal your way into a kill with some big low-health crits. Tryndamere is about riding that zero health line as long as possible without dying. Cleanse and heals are big. Especially when tower diving at level 6. If you go the dps route fast it usually means you have to trade kills.
Bumping this because of all the terrible Tryn info that's been passed out recently.
This guide is awesome. My friend used it to great effect recently.
You might want to make a whole thread on the timing on tyrndamere, it makes or breaks players.
Also, I just realized that, to make full use of his ult, you should heal yourself at a point where you will have more than two seconds to live after the heal. Then, you pop his ult, and you can heal yourself again at the end, because of the full stacks it gives you.
Nice guide btw. I usually do the same thing, but I get ghostblade before I stack bloodthirsters. Using ghostblade during your ult is nice.
© 2015 Riot Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Riot Games, League of Legends and PvP.net are trademarks, services marks, or registered trademarks of Riot Games, Inc.


text: Events in Denmark Listings of events in Denmark Eat out in star-studded Denmark! Get ready for Denmark's biggest events this year! Maritime Museum may be European Museum of the Year 2015! 20 unique things to do in Denmark A big new reason to visit Denmark! See our brand new Michelin-starred restaurants guide Plan your year with our Top Events Guide 2015 Find out why this underwater universe is so special Try something a little different! Meet Misty the diplodocus! (Photo: Summers Place Auctions) Explore the unique Danish idea of hygge Denmark's brand new Bib Gourmand Restaurants! Things to do Film and TV locations you should visit! Have Danish films or TV series inspired you to get to know Denmark? Then use our guide to Film and TV locations in Denmark to help plan your trip! See famous sights in and around Copenhagen Copenhagen in a city full of famous sights. But if you fancy getting outside the city limits, there are also many world-renowned sights nearby, such as Kronborg Castle. Where to get your hands on Danish design! Put a bit of Danish design in your life! Where to get your hands on Danish design! We recommend Denmark's most-visited, must-see attractions! Put Denmark's top attractions on your list From modern art by the sea to the world's oldest theme park, explore Denmark's best-loved sights and attractions. Denmark's most-visited, must-see attractions! Here are Denmark's biggest events in 2015! Banish winter blues with some shopping! Get your hands on all sorts of Danish design goodies this winter, when Denmark's shops offer sales and shelter from the cold! Recommended travel guides Mouth-watering Michelin-starred restaurants Explore the sights of royal Denmark Treat yourself to shopping in Denmark Danish castles and manor houses open for you Exceptional design and boutique hotels The magic of world-famous Tivoli Gardens See why Copenhagen is built for kids! Practical tips Transport in Denmark Emergencies Entry regulations General information Money and shopping Restaurants Special travel Tour Operator Most popular Denmark's most-visited attractions What's on right now Michelin-starred restaurants Relax on Denmark's beaches Copenhagen's top attractions Denmark Destinations North Jutland West Jutland East Jutland South Jutland Funen (Fyn) West Zealand North Zealand South Zealand Copenhagen Bornholm #visitdenmark and see all of this! 1 1 2 9 2 309 11 61 0 12 15 63 0 0 0 43 2 121 1 57 1 17 3 71 0 6 0 31 Follow us on Instagram


text:
|Regions:Dover/Somersworth -Great Bay - Rochester - Southern Maine
|Exeter Greenland Portsmouth New Castle Newington Stratham Rye
Go Mobile: http://mobile.fosters.com
Five generations at El Pond
Sunday, December 9, 2012
The gathering of five generations was held at El Pond in Wells, Maine this past summer. Back Row from left: Great-great granparents Christine and Raymond Bilodeau of Eliot, Maine; great-grandmother Diane Ertz of Columbia, Md. Front Row from left: Grandfather Jerome Ertz of York, Pa., holding his grandson Quentin Michael Moser, and next to Quentin, his mother Danni Moser of Red Lion, Pa.


text:
Puzzle Levels
Download a FREE Solution for your puzzles!
Twist the Prism (Prismentwist)
Product Information
|Place the pieces in the correct place on the base
|Level 8 - Demanding
|Logika Spiele
|Base measures: 6 1/4 in x 4 1/4 in / 15.9 cm x 10.7 cm
Product Description
Warning! The instructions and packaging are in German.
Twist the prism is a 3-D puzzle made from recycled plastic by Ingo Uhl. It consists of 12 different stones. These stones are made up of prisms. A rock consists of two prisms, two stones consist of three prisms and nine stones consist of 4 prisms. Eight of these stones are three dimensional and four are two-dimensional. The game also has a base platform. This has 38 triangular fields and is designed so that very many different symmetric three-dimensional structures can be created. Rough calculations have shown that 10 to the power 19 different buildings can be made. There is a record sheet for games that you have designed so that newly invented building can be recorded. Twist the prism is mainly played as a single person game, but can also be played in a group.
Included in package
- 1 base platform
- 12 plastic pieces
- Instructions with 100 different ways to put the pieces together as well as a place to record the ones you make up.
Customer Reviews |Write your own review!
This item has yet to be rated


text:
Trailer Programme
Nooteboom low-loaders
Ever since the first swing-axle low-loader in 1953, Nooteboom low-loaders have set the trend in Europe and much further afield .
Nooteboom semi low-loaders
Nooteboom has a wide range of semi low-loaders that are extremely versatile and can be used for the transport of, among others,...
Nooteboom flatbed (extendible) semi-trailers
For the transport of long loads Nooteboom offers an extensive programme under the name of Teletrailers®. The Ballast trailer for... More...
Nooteboom drawbar trailers
Nooteboom drawbar trailers are simple and efficient transport solutions for payloads up to approx. 30 tonnes.
Latest news
More payload, less cost : The new 7-axle ballast trailer of Nooteboom
Nooteboom Trailers sets a new standard with the ballast trailer OVB-95-07 for the transport of crane ballast. The trailer has been improved to meet the requirements as laid down in German legislation.
Nooteboom MCOS semi low-loader makes switching to hydraulic steering easier
The latest generation MCOS semi low-loaders with hydraulic steering are the optimal transport solution for the transport of medium-weight machinery (up to 47 tonnes) that is fast, cost-effective and safe.
Lensveld Transport ordered 10 Nooteboom Teletrailers
Lensveld Transport from Vlaardingen has ordered ten new Teletrailers of the type O-45-03V from Nooteboom Trailers.
Largest 3+6 Nooteboom Pendel-X low-loader for ADM Team Heavy Weight
VDL-KTI, a company from Geel, recently built a mixing plant for chemicals destined for a new drilling rig in Scottish territorial waters near Hartlepool. The apparatus was 9.5m long, 5.1m wide and just over 8 metres wide.
Latest Nooteboom semi low-loader OSDS-44-03WEB for the transport of wheel loaders and dumpers
With the new semi low-loader OSDS-44-03 Nooteboom, one of the leading manufacturers of heavy transport vehicles, offers a 3-axle semi low-loader that is specially designed for the transport of large wheel loaders or tippers. The main purpose of this new 3-axle semi low-loader with wheel wells is to be able to transport as large a variety of makes and types of plant as possible without exceeding the 40-tonne weight limit that is legal in Germany. This provides the transport operator or construction business with the greatest flexibility and the lowest running costs.


text:
Tom Franklin's Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter begins with one of the most compelling first lines I've heard in a while: "The Rutherford girl had been missing for eight days when Larry Ott returned home and found a monster waiting in his house." From there, Kevin Kenerly's expert narration winds us through the empty storefronts, rusted out mailboxes, and weeded trailer lots of Chabot, Mississippi, where Ott pays the price every day for a 25-year-old crime no one can prove he committed. Silas "32" Jones lives on the opposite side of the law as the sheriff of this "hamlet", where he continues to build on his hero status (earned on the high school baseball field) by doing expert police work.
In addition to the murder, Franklin has woven into this tale a Faulknerian family mystery complete with unexplained photographs, hand-me-down coats, and shotguns earned in fistfights. 32's efforts to solve the Rutherford girl's murder lead him much further back into his past than he is prepared to go, back to a one-room cabin on the Ott property where he lived as a child with his mother.
Kenerly speaks in a journalistic tone showing neither judgment of Ott's isolated, suspicious lifestyle nor admiration of 32's heroism. A vehicle for the story in earnest, Kenerly allows us to follow Franklin's carefully placed clues about the Rutherford girl's murder and Larry and 32's mysterious and tangled past. Kenerly does this not only without giving anything away, but by adding a detached detective tone, carving out a space in the story for our emotions.
To the open-minded listener, Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter is an opportunity to atone for our playground sins not necessarily to straighten out our crooked letters, but to be redeemed into something more whole. Sarah Evans Hogeboom
In a small Mississippi town, two men are torn apart by circumstance and reunited by tragedy in this resonant new novel from the award-winning author of the critically-acclaimed Hell at the Breech.
Larry Ott and Silas "32" Jones were unlikely boyhood friends. Larry was the child of lower middle-class white parents, Silas the son of a poor, single, black mother - their worlds as different as night and day. Yet a special bond developed between them in Chabot, Mississippi. But within a few years, tragedy struck. In high school, a girl who lived up the road from Larry had gone to the drive-in movie with him and nobody had seen her again. Her stepfather tried to have Larry arrested, but no body was found and Larry never confessed. The incident shook up the town, including Silas, and the bond the boys shared was irrevocably broken.
Almost 30 years have passed. Larry, a mechanic, lives a solitary existence in Chabot, never able to rise above the whispers of suspicion, the looks of blame that have shadowed him. Silas left home to play college baseball, but now he's Chabot's constable. The men have few reasons to cross paths, and they rarely do - until fate intervenes again.
Another teenaged girl has disappeared, causing rumors to swirl once again. Now, two men who once called each other friend are finally forced to confront the painful past they've buried for too many years.
©2010 Tom Franklin (P)2010 Blackstone Audio, Inc.
"A masterful performance, deftly rendered and deeply satisfying. For days on end, I woke with this story on my mind." (David Wroblewski, New York Times best-selling author of The Story of Edgar Sawtelle)
"Excellent story, terrific narrator."
The author deftly leads the reader into a small Southern town to watch and ultimately understand the way two boys -- one black, one white -- interpret friendship and loyalty, both as youths and later as adults, and how the judgment of the town's residents can destroy one of the boys' life. Plenty of action, with surprising twists all along the way, keep the story intriguing and unique.
"Fantastic story in the south I know"
I usually don't buy books less than 10 hours and am easily distracted by bad southern accents, so I let this pass me by several times. I am so glad a recent editor's review convinced me to download this - it is the best audiobook I have listened to in a couple of years at least. This audiobook gets it right on so many levels. The narration, mystery, and characters are all spot on.
The number one narration pitfall in more than one audiobook is the southern small town law officer. Here the main character is a constable in a fictional Mississippi town, and he is read especially beautifully. The others have reasonable accents that give life to the characters without being too distracting. The mystery (mysteries) are also compelling. This is not a whodunit with a build to a surprise twist, but a slow unveiling of the truth and more importantly, an understanding of the people involved. And the people - that is where this book excels.
I am in my forties and rarely read anything involving race that has any relation to my experience of current life in the deep south, but this book is absolutely the best depiction of the complexities of class and race in everyday relationships. Not as defining elements, as in so many books with outdated stereotypes, but still integral to the understanding of the history of people growing up post segregation. These characters felt real, gripped me early, and kept me compelled until the end.
I highly, highly recommend this audiobook.
"Well Written - Darn Depressing"
Mr. Franklin has a thorough knowlege of the rural, post integration south. Having said that, his characters make David Copperfield seem like privileged youth. He has drawn my compassion quota almost over the top. I believe the basis of the book is abuse of children of both races and its consequences. John Wayne Gacey is both the name of a character's dog and, a glimpse of the depravity that can grow in a neglected and abused young person. This is not a novel for the sensitive.
The two main characters of this book will haunt me which is I suspect, the mark of a good author.
I am a 65-year-old psychologist, married for 25 years, with two sons who are 25 and 22. I love reviewing the books and the feedback I get.
"A remarkable, poignant, masterful work."
You might not expect a story set in Southeastern Mississippi to be so poignant and so
completely involving. (I apologize to all Mississippians). The title refers to the method in which
children are taught the spelling of their state's name. However, the story and the characters here are so thoroughly, so brilliantly conceived that the book holds your interest in a spellbinding way. Virtually any other book will find that this one is a hard act to follow. The primary characters, Larry Ott and Silas (who is known as 32) have a story to tell that draws you in and grabs you by the brain and heart. I searched for Tom Franklin's other work, and was disappointed to find how little there is. Very hard to make a living as a writer these days, no matter how breathtaking your talent is. I can rave about other books, but I can't rave hard enough to do this one justice. The two men have intertwining life stories that encircle each other in a way that constantly surprises you. Justice, that wonderful construct (in the abstract) follows them for twenty or thirty years of their lives. I won't spoil the plot or the nature of these two men for you: the delight is in your own discovery. The secondary characters are also extremely well drawn, although the women are less so than the men, as we have come to expect, even from the best of our male writers these days. One of the women turns out to have an absolutely critical role. I will say little more, except to tell Tom Franklin, if he happens to be reading, to bear up and be brave: his talent is almost matchless. We are out here reading, and we are waiting for him to write again.
"Great Story Telling"
This is classic story telling at it's best. It's a nicely paced story about the history of two men. The narrator does a great job of different inflections when dialogs are read. I was sorry to see this book end. It left me wanting to learn more about the characters, although it had wrapped up the story quite nicely.
"Simply Beautiful"
The very best download this year for me. Couldn't wait to know what happened...never wanted it to end. Simple, touching, real and read by the BEST narrator yet. Worth every hour of listening! Can't recommend it highly enough.
"Good story, excellent reader."
I grew up near the area this book was set (the settings are fictional, but the bigger towns, like Hattiesburg and Meridian, are real). From just a Mississippi standpoint, it does a good job of representing some elements of the region. Maybe it's a little darker and more isolated than the exact region is, but that hardly matters to the novel.
The story is very good. It starts as a bit of a mystery, then turns into more of a story about relationships and culture and personal history of the region. The racial dynamics struck me as very real, which is unusual for a story set in Mississippi in the 80s (the history parts of the story). Either the racism is too extreme or not visible, usually, but this story nails it just perfectly. The racial tensions are there, but they are also weakening, and they don't create conflict, so much as they influence conflict when it happens.
The characters are good. Larry is hard to get a read on, in a good way, and the rest of the characters have their good and bad sides, interwoven believably. The plot develops smoothly, with tension and suspense but without an artificial formulaic feel. The relationships feel genuine, sometimes pathetic, sometimes touching.
Overall, I really liked the book. It's not a tense thriller or a cliff-hanging mystery, but more of a story of relationships within a mystery. It's dark and brooding and a wonderful moody setting that felt real to me.
The reader is fantastic, and fits the tone of the writing perfectly. He creates distinct voices, crosses subtle accent and dialogue and even racial distinctions without caricature, and generally just feels like the story.
So I'd recommend it as a good story, a great mood setting, and a great narration.
Books like this are why I am an audible customer. It took a little time to get into the book because it does jump around a bit. I even had to rewind a bit and go back to reconnect to the story, but it was late and I was drowsy too. Unexpected twists and turns kept my attention from then on. Well written book by a wordsmith that knows how to turn a phrase. Well narrated too. Five stars for mystery lovers.
"Great book, wonderful reading"
I enjoyed this book more than any book in recent history. This was a great mystery with no ridiculous surprises or twists. Good characters, great plot, very evocative descriptions. What's more, Kevin Kenerly is a fantastic actor and it was a treat to hear this read in such authentic voice. Nothing about it was corny or overdone, and there was no cringing at his female voices, either. Perfectly done. I'm looking forward to more from this author and reader.
I love audio and ebooks but only give them a 5 if they hold my attention. An avereage story gets a 3 . Thrillers & Crime are my favorites.
"Feels like you are there"
Wonderully written story. As many of the scenes unfold, particularly the memories of the characters you almost feel like you are there with them. Very well done and engrossing. I was lloking forward to see what happened but didn't really want it to end.
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.


text:
Maple and Mustard Glazed Chicken
After having made several sweet maple recipes it was time to make a savoury one. I remembered seeing a tasty looking maple and mustard glazed chicken dish on Noble Pig that I had bookmarked to try. Honey and dijon mustard are a classic combination that I really enjoy and I had no doubts that the maple dijon combo would be just as good. Recently I have come to really appreciate mustard and one of the things that I liked about this recipe was that it used a grainy mustard in addition to the Dijon mustard for extra flavour and a nice texture. In this recipe the chicken is breaded and fried until golden brown and crispy and then smothered in the maple and mustard glaze and before it is finished cooking in the oven. For the breading I used a mixture of regular bread crumbs and panko breadcrumbs to add more nooks and crannies for the glaze to stick to. The chicken came out really tender and moist and good! The maple and mustard glaze was great! It was really tasty and it had a great balance between the sweet and spicy elements. The maple really worked well with the mustard and its flavour came through nicely. This recipe is definitely a keeper! I served the maple and mustard glazed chicken with some cheesy broccoli rice and maple and dill carrots.
Maple and Mustard Glazed Chicken(makes 2 servings)
Printable Recipe
2 chicken breasts (pounded flat)
salt and pepper to taste
1/2 cup all-purpose flour
1 egg (lightly beaten)
1 cup bread crumbs (I used a mixture of regular bread crumbs and panko bread crumbs)
4 tablespoons maple syrup
6 tablespoons Dijon mustard
2 tablespoons whole-grain mustard
2 tablespoons brown sugar
1/2 teaspoon thyme (chopped)
1 tablespoon olive oil
1. Season the chicken with salt and pepper and set aside.
2. Dredge the chicken in the flour.
3. Dip the chicken into the egg.
4. Dredge the chicken in the bread crumbs.
5. Heat the oil in a pan
6. Add the chicken and cook until golden brown on both sides, about 2 minutes per side.
7. Mix the maple syrup, Dijon mustard, whole grained mustard, brown sugar and thyme in a bowl.
8. Place the chicken in a baking pan and brush the maple mustard mixture onto it heavily.
9. Bake in a preheated 400F oven for 10 minutes.
Similar Recipes:
Curried Honey Dijon Roasted Chicken
Corned Beef Glazed in Honey and Mustard Dinner with Cabbage
Ham Crusted with Mustard and Gingersnap Crumbs
Chicken Baked in Green Tomato and Jalapeno Jam
Maple Dijon Grilled Chicken
Quinoa Crusted Chicken Parmesan
Other Maple Recipes


text:
Black and White Valet
2625 N. Orchard, Chicago, IL 60613
Parking Wed, Apr 1, 2015 from 12:30am to 3:30am
You must enter this lot on Wrightwood St.
Amenities Included:
After purchase, please enter in your license plate number. Upon arrival, please park in an available space. Your parking will be validated, per your license plate number, by a roaming attendant. You may print your pass and place it on your dash, if you choose to.
Monthly Parking
Amenities Included:
Description: Monthly parking available at our 2625 N. Orchard location. Available hours are as followed:
Monday-Friday: in after 4:30pm & out by 7:00am,
Sat-Sun: 24 Hours.
Redemption instructions: Upon purchase, please display your ParkWhiz confirmation pass on your dashboard when parking.
Please be advised that this pass will serve as your monthly parking validation. You will also be asked to register your vehicle. Contact information will be provided after you purchase a spot.
127 People Recommend Parking Here
77 Left Comments
This large open surface lot abuts the Louisa May Alcot Public School. A small black fence surrounds the perimeter. You will see the school on the left side of the lot.
This location is a commercial parking lot.
Nearby destinations: Taste of Lincoln Avenue, Maxim Revenue Management, Landmark's Century Centre Cinema.
This open surface parking lot is the school lot for Louisa May Alcott Public School. For GPS purposes use "668 W. Wrightwood." You will enter off of Wrightwood heading West just before Orchard.
Monthly Parking Available!
Click "Monthly Parking Available" on the left to see monthly rates and book a spot online!